<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_15_169205</id>
	<title>Six Men Endure 105-Day Mars Flight Simulator</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247676960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>drunken\_boxer777 writes with this excerpt from an AP report:
<i>"Six men emerged from a metal hatch after <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap\_on\_sc/eu\_russia\_mission\_to\_mars">105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft</a>, still smiling after testing the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars. They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers &mdash; who also monitored them via TV cameras &mdash; and an internal e-mail system. Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>drunken \ _boxer777 writes with this excerpt from an AP report : " Six men emerged from a metal hatch after 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft , still smiling after testing the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars .
They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment 's controllers    who also monitored them via TV cameras    and an internal e-mail system .
Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drunken\_boxer777 writes with this excerpt from an AP report:
"Six men emerged from a metal hatch after 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft, still smiling after testing the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars.
They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers — who also monitored them via TV cameras — and an internal e-mail system.
Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706361</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>Maximus633</author>
	<datestamp>1247686380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi, Yes NetFlix I had a change of address...  Yeah I am on mars right now.  Can you send me Apollo 13?  What? No? Why not?!  I want to watch Apollo 13!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi , Yes NetFlix I had a change of address... Yeah I am on mars right now .
Can you send me Apollo 13 ?
What ? No ?
Why not ? !
I want to watch Apollo 13 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi, Yes NetFlix I had a change of address...  Yeah I am on mars right now.
Can you send me Apollo 13?
What? No?
Why not?!
I want to watch Apollo 13!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707033</id>
	<title>Re:internal email system?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247689320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naval Message?</p><p>That would require a:</p><p>"V/r"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naval Message ? That would require a : " V/r "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naval Message?That would require a:"V/r"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705271</id>
	<title>Real isolation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want to know what <a href="http://www.gdargaud.net/Antarctica/WinterDC.html" title="gdargaud.net">365 days in real isolation in a tin can</a> [gdargaud.net] feels like... At least we had: (1) plenty of things to do, (2) the pressure that if we failed bad we'd most likely die. They had: (1) nothing to do, (2) the possibility to open the can if things got bad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to know what 365 days in real isolation in a tin can [ gdargaud.net ] feels like... At least we had : ( 1 ) plenty of things to do , ( 2 ) the pressure that if we failed bad we 'd most likely die .
They had : ( 1 ) nothing to do , ( 2 ) the possibility to open the can if things got bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to know what 365 days in real isolation in a tin can [gdargaud.net] feels like... At least we had: (1) plenty of things to do, (2) the pressure that if we failed bad we'd most likely die.
They had: (1) nothing to do, (2) the possibility to open the can if things got bad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706843</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>fooslacker</author>
	<datestamp>1247688480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it a one for one comparison that gives you a perfect sim? No.  But does it provide useful data? sure.  To call it useless because it isn't a perfect sim is a bit silly.
<br> <br>
That's why they call them simulations.  It can't expose all stress factors and no it isn't allowed to kill people to simulate death but that doesn't make it useless.  Some stresses can be discovered and tested and dealt with.  They psychologically tested the early Astronauts too.  Again, was it a perfect sim? No but it wasn't useless and it at least begins to harden and prepare the mind for some portion of what it will face.
<br> <br>
Additionally it helps weed out those that will face issues because if they can't hack this they can't hack the real deal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it a one for one comparison that gives you a perfect sim ?
No. But does it provide useful data ?
sure. To call it useless because it is n't a perfect sim is a bit silly .
That 's why they call them simulations .
It ca n't expose all stress factors and no it is n't allowed to kill people to simulate death but that does n't make it useless .
Some stresses can be discovered and tested and dealt with .
They psychologically tested the early Astronauts too .
Again , was it a perfect sim ?
No but it was n't useless and it at least begins to harden and prepare the mind for some portion of what it will face .
Additionally it helps weed out those that will face issues because if they ca n't hack this they ca n't hack the real deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it a one for one comparison that gives you a perfect sim?
No.  But does it provide useful data?
sure.  To call it useless because it isn't a perfect sim is a bit silly.
That's why they call them simulations.
It can't expose all stress factors and no it isn't allowed to kill people to simulate death but that doesn't make it useless.
Some stresses can be discovered and tested and dealt with.
They psychologically tested the early Astronauts too.
Again, was it a perfect sim?
No but it wasn't useless and it at least begins to harden and prepare the mind for some portion of what it will face.
Additionally it helps weed out those that will face issues because if they can't hack this they can't hack the real deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707795</id>
	<title>Laaaaag.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>20 minute lag? Man, they would need to find a really high-ping server to play UT2004.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>20 minute lag ?
Man , they would need to find a really high-ping server to play UT2004 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>20 minute lag?
Man, they would need to find a really high-ping server to play UT2004.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707549</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1247648640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure. And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [foxnews.com] of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!</p></div><p>Put on a bigger engine, make the trip shorter. How is left as an exercise to the reader.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while , but we 're not talking about a while , we 're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure .
Many perfectly healthy , strong , capable people would crack under this kind of pressure .
And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [ foxnews.com ] of living here on Earth , with lots of air , beer , and pretty babes ! Put on a bigger engine , make the trip shorter .
How is left as an exercise to the reader .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure.
Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.
And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [foxnews.com] of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!Put on a bigger engine, make the trip shorter.
How is left as an exercise to the reader.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705285</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>MobileMrX</author>
	<datestamp>1247681760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the solution:</p><p>"Hey guys, we are going to do one more simulation, just step over here.  We've made some improvements that make this ULTRA realistic."</p><p>Let them think it is a simulation until they get to Mars, then send them the "tricked you!" email when they get there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the solution : " Hey guys , we are going to do one more simulation , just step over here .
We 've made some improvements that make this ULTRA realistic .
" Let them think it is a simulation until they get to Mars , then send them the " tricked you !
" email when they get there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the solution:"Hey guys, we are going to do one more simulation, just step over here.
We've made some improvements that make this ULTRA realistic.
"Let them think it is a simulation until they get to Mars, then send them the "tricked you!
" email when they get there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707627</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.</p></div><p>True. Especially when avoiding our IT project managers.<br>Unfortunately, in this case, it would be much more difficult to say "I was away from my desk"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails , but that 's little different than email is already.True .
Especially when avoiding our IT project managers.Unfortunately , in this case , it would be much more difficult to say " I was away from my desk "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.True.
Especially when avoiding our IT project managers.Unfortunately, in this case, it would be much more difficult to say "I was away from my desk"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708957</id>
	<title>Re:Intimate human contact</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1247655420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?</p></div><p>Well, that rules out the married folks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips ? Well , that rules out the married folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?Well, that rules out the married folks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707771</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!</p></div><p>Uhh, we already did that:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_cadets" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_cadets</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what we should do is put people in a " mock spacecraft " for a " test " and launch them towards Mars .
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise ! Uhh , we already did that : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space \ _cadets [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars.
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!Uhh, we already did that:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_cadets [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705855</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1247683920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing.</p></div><p>So you're saying that if they screw this up, they get kicked up to management?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But an actual , honest-to-god Mars trip is different , and everybody will know it .
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest , blackest , most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom .
No air , no beer , no babes .
Nothing.So you 're saying that if they screw this up , they get kicked up to management ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it.
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.
No air, no beer, no babes.
Nothing.So you're saying that if they screw this up, they get kicked up to management?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707903</id>
	<title>simulation</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1247650260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>did they simulate the lack of gravity and radiation as well?  I didn't think so.  The ISS is a better simulation of the voyage.  As has been pointed out, submariners routinely endure 100 day missions without outside contact; so, they didn't really prove much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>did they simulate the lack of gravity and radiation as well ?
I did n't think so .
The ISS is a better simulation of the voyage .
As has been pointed out , submariners routinely endure 100 day missions without outside contact ; so , they did n't really prove much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did they simulate the lack of gravity and radiation as well?
I didn't think so.
The ISS is a better simulation of the voyage.
As has been pointed out, submariners routinely endure 100 day missions without outside contact; so, they didn't really prove much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707949</id>
	<title>Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247650500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But even your cramped submarine was much bigger than a mars vehicle will be, and had a lot more room for entertainment related equipment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But even your cramped submarine was much bigger than a mars vehicle will be , and had a lot more room for entertainment related equipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But even your cramped submarine was much bigger than a mars vehicle will be, and had a lot more room for entertainment related equipment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707971</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>whopub</author>
	<datestamp>1247650560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience). The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength. They didn't go insane.</p></div><p>
Well, if they fell for that they didn't have to go insane, they'd have a huge headstart to begin with.
<br> <br>
It's a shame I wasn't involved in the production of that one! I'd apoint one as commander and give him a Napoleon suit!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space ( until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience ) .
The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength .
They did n't go insane .
Well , if they fell for that they did n't have to go insane , they 'd have a huge headstart to begin with .
It 's a shame I was n't involved in the production of that one !
I 'd apoint one as commander and give him a Napoleon suit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience).
The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength.
They didn't go insane.
Well, if they fell for that they didn't have to go insane, they'd have a huge headstart to begin with.
It's a shame I wasn't involved in the production of that one!
I'd apoint one as commander and give him a Napoleon suit!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707875</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247650140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also different in that "no tv and no internet" will not apply. I really don't see how they put that restriction on them.</p><p>1TB of storage hardly takes any physical space at all and will hold roughly 40 hours of video.   I don't see why they wouldnt launch with the most massive dvd/tvrip collection known to man. And a local copy of wikipedia, plenty of ebooks, etc.</p><p>I'm not saying it would be easy, but there certainly would be more entertainment than is found on this test.</p><p>For that matter, I'd be surprised if they kept everyone conscious the entire way.  It's a pretty clear shot, why wouldn't we just have everyone in an induced sleep?  Work out the medicine involved to keep people asleep for weeks or months at a time and the trip will be nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also different in that " no tv and no internet " will not apply .
I really do n't see how they put that restriction on them.1TB of storage hardly takes any physical space at all and will hold roughly 40 hours of video .
I do n't see why they wouldnt launch with the most massive dvd/tvrip collection known to man .
And a local copy of wikipedia , plenty of ebooks , etc.I 'm not saying it would be easy , but there certainly would be more entertainment than is found on this test.For that matter , I 'd be surprised if they kept everyone conscious the entire way .
It 's a pretty clear shot , why would n't we just have everyone in an induced sleep ?
Work out the medicine involved to keep people asleep for weeks or months at a time and the trip will be nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also different in that "no tv and no internet" will not apply.
I really don't see how they put that restriction on them.1TB of storage hardly takes any physical space at all and will hold roughly 40 hours of video.
I don't see why they wouldnt launch with the most massive dvd/tvrip collection known to man.
And a local copy of wikipedia, plenty of ebooks, etc.I'm not saying it would be easy, but there certainly would be more entertainment than is found on this test.For that matter, I'd be surprised if they kept everyone conscious the entire way.
It's a pretty clear shot, why wouldn't we just have everyone in an induced sleep?
Work out the medicine involved to keep people asleep for weeks or months at a time and the trip will be nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706735</id>
	<title>Celebrities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They had no television or Internet...</i></p><p>One of the first questions asked by the test subjects:<br>"So, did any famous celebrities die while we were on our mission of isolation?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They had no television or Internet...One of the first questions asked by the test subjects : " So , did any famous celebrities die while we were on our mission of isolation ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had no television or Internet...One of the first questions asked by the test subjects:"So, did any famous celebrities die while we were on our mission of isolation?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709073</id>
	<title>Hutu Uprising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247655780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The isolation is tough, but the hardest part of a mission to Mars is surviving the Hutu uprising.</p><p>And always make sure the monkey doesn't steal your suspended animation chamber.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The isolation is tough , but the hardest part of a mission to Mars is surviving the Hutu uprising.And always make sure the monkey does n't steal your suspended animation chamber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The isolation is tough, but the hardest part of a mission to Mars is surviving the Hutu uprising.And always make sure the monkey doesn't steal your suspended animation chamber.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705657</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about using a second hand soviet nuclear submarine?</p><p>Crushing pressures outside the vessel, old reactor core 50 metres from where you sleep, noisy cramped environment, etc.</p><p>Also, they would *have* to perform certain maintenance tasks or risk any number of horrible deaths.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about using a second hand soviet nuclear submarine ? Crushing pressures outside the vessel , old reactor core 50 metres from where you sleep , noisy cramped environment , etc.Also , they would * have * to perform certain maintenance tasks or risk any number of horrible deaths .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about using a second hand soviet nuclear submarine?Crushing pressures outside the vessel, old reactor core 50 metres from where you sleep, noisy cramped environment, etc.Also, they would *have* to perform certain maintenance tasks or risk any number of horrible deaths.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28738585</id>
	<title>Institute for Temporal and Scheduling Problems...</title>
	<author>dhempy</author>
	<datestamp>1247857740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...officials at the Institute for Medical and Biological Problems praised the experiment as a success and promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year...</p><p>Nice trick.  Maybe they rented 100 capsules for a week...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...officials at the Institute for Medical and Biological Problems praised the experiment as a success and promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year...Nice trick .
Maybe they rented 100 capsules for a week.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...officials at the Institute for Medical and Biological Problems praised the experiment as a success and promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year...Nice trick.
Maybe they rented 100 capsules for a week...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153</id>
	<title>Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1247681280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.  Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars.  There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows .
Ironically , while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them , it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars .
There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails , but that 's little different than email is already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.
Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars.
There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706383</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>Welshalian</author>
	<datestamp>1247686560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.  Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars.  There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.</p></div><p>Do not underestimate the bandwidth of a spaceship full of tapes!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows .
Ironically , while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them , it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars .
There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails , but that 's little different than email is already.Do not underestimate the bandwidth of a spaceship full of tapes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.
Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars.
There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.Do not underestimate the bandwidth of a spaceship full of tapes!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706015</id>
	<title>Re:Better bring a game or two</title>
	<author>b1t r0t</author>
	<datestamp>1247684580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know what kind of hand-to-eye coordination they'll practice after they get the inevitable RROD, but it could involve their fisted-up hands hands in someone else's eye.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know what kind of hand-to-eye coordination they 'll practice after they get the inevitable RROD , but it could involve their fisted-up hands hands in someone else 's eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know what kind of hand-to-eye coordination they'll practice after they get the inevitable RROD, but it could involve their fisted-up hands hands in someone else's eye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712049</id>
	<title>Re:Psychology</title>
	<author>pyro\_peter\_911</author>
	<datestamp>1247674440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!" and poof! Problems solved.</p></div></blockquote><p>
That works for road trips to Mardi Gras also.
</p><p>
Peter</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel , outside of the simulator , all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying " Guys , we 're on our way to MARS !
" and poof !
Problems solved .
That works for road trips to Mardi Gras also .
Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!
" and poof!
Problems solved.
That works for road trips to Mardi Gras also.
Peter
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713865</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247736300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be "quite easy" to test real flight to Mars - they just must repeat test on ISS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be " quite easy " to test real flight to Mars - they just must repeat test on ISS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be "quite easy" to test real flight to Mars - they just must repeat test on ISS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705699</id>
	<title>Skip to the end...</title>
	<author>BenSchuarmer</author>
	<datestamp>1247683380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls.</p><p>
Russian officials at the time downplayed the incidents, attributing it to cultural gaps and stress.
</p><p>Soviet engineers also tried a similar yearlong experiment, but that was interrupted because of unending conflicts between crew members.</p></div><p>
It sounds like this is there only successful attempt in three tries.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The experiment was the second for the institute , whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls .
Russian officials at the time downplayed the incidents , attributing it to cultural gaps and stress .
Soviet engineers also tried a similar yearlong experiment , but that was interrupted because of unending conflicts between crew members .
It sounds like this is there only successful attempt in three tries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls.
Russian officials at the time downplayed the incidents, attributing it to cultural gaps and stress.
Soviet engineers also tried a similar yearlong experiment, but that was interrupted because of unending conflicts between crew members.
It sounds like this is there only successful attempt in three tries.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28716345</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247757540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add air, add beer, add babes inside the ship and it will be even better than the simulation !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add air , add beer , add babes inside the ship and it will be even better than the simulation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add air, add beer, add babes inside the ship and it will be even better than the simulation !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711351</id>
	<title>Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1247669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, someone knowledgeable about this - I was just asking the other day, "why isn't a Mars mission the same thing as a submarine mission plus some heat management?"</p><p>Do submerged subs exchange with the seawater for oxygen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , someone knowledgeable about this - I was just asking the other day , " why is n't a Mars mission the same thing as a submarine mission plus some heat management ?
" Do submerged subs exchange with the seawater for oxygen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, someone knowledgeable about this - I was just asking the other day, "why isn't a Mars mission the same thing as a submarine mission plus some heat management?
"Do submerged subs exchange with the seawater for oxygen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711911</id>
	<title>Re:Real isolation</title>
	<author>shird</author>
	<datestamp>1247673360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just ask Elizabeth Fritzl. At least she had TV though, and kids. Getting raped by your father was probably a downside though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just ask Elizabeth Fritzl .
At least she had TV though , and kids .
Getting raped by your father was probably a downside though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just ask Elizabeth Fritzl.
At least she had TV though, and kids.
Getting raped by your father was probably a downside though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349</id>
	<title>Submarine Patrol 105 Days</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was on a US Navy, FBM submarine, we typically spent 105 days submerged, with no contact from the outside world. It was not fun, but it was not that hard either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was on a US Navy , FBM submarine , we typically spent 105 days submerged , with no contact from the outside world .
It was not fun , but it was not that hard either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was on a US Navy, FBM submarine, we typically spent 105 days submerged, with no contact from the outside world.
It was not fun, but it was not that hard either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706757</id>
	<title>US is doing it too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.fmars2009.org/" title="fmars2009.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.fmars2009.org/</a> [fmars2009.org]</p><p>They are focusing on what to do when on mars, rather than what to do when going to mars though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.fmars2009.org/ [ fmars2009.org ] They are focusing on what to do when on mars , rather than what to do when going to mars though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.fmars2009.org/ [fmars2009.org]They are focusing on what to do when on mars, rather than what to do when going to mars though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706883</id>
	<title>Mission to Mars Needs Women.</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1247688660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's lonely in space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's lonely in space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's lonely in space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255</id>
	<title>Trip to Mars takes 9 months</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1247681640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice test, but of course a Hohmann trajectory to Mars takes nine months-- 275 days, not 105.

They exited the spacecraft when they were only halfway there!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice test , but of course a Hohmann trajectory to Mars takes nine months-- 275 days , not 105 .
They exited the spacecraft when they were only halfway there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice test, but of course a Hohmann trajectory to Mars takes nine months-- 275 days, not 105.
They exited the spacecraft when they were only halfway there!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707857</id>
	<title>More power to you!</title>
	<author>bonedog73</author>
	<datestamp>1247650080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad there are people willing to do this type of thing, I'm just not one of them. I have no desire to goto Mars with today's technology. When we can hop on a plane and get to Mars in a few hours...not that will be something!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad there are people willing to do this type of thing , I 'm just not one of them .
I have no desire to goto Mars with today 's technology .
When we can hop on a plane and get to Mars in a few hours...not that will be something !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad there are people willing to do this type of thing, I'm just not one of them.
I have no desire to goto Mars with today's technology.
When we can hop on a plane and get to Mars in a few hours...not that will be something!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708005</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Deputy Doodah</author>
	<datestamp>1247650800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I disagree.
It's my own experience that simulations drive people crazy.
<br> <br>
I served aboard a submarine.
<br>
Sometimes before we left on a deployment we would go through a drill called a "fast cruise'. We'd be tied up at the dock, surfaced, but the whole crew would be down below with the hatches shut pretending we were at sea and submerged. It was absolutely maddening because we knew that air, beer, and babes were separated from us by 2 to 3 inches of steel and that everything we were suffering through was just made-up. With no real danger and no real mission to concentrate on, we were left to wallow in our misery.
<br> <br>
When we were actually on deployment we were submerged for months at a time, which was no picnic, but it was much more bearable than spending 24 hours at the pier. Part of it was knowing that death lay on the other side of those 2 to 3 inches of steel and that we were in the most comfortable spot out in the middle of nowhere. There was stress, but that stress was due to real conditions, which is much more tolerable than stress that's contrived. With real stress you barely notice conditions like the AC being off while you're sitting next to a reactor.
<br> <br>
When the same thing was being done as a drill, we just sat there sweaty and pissed off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
It 's my own experience that simulations drive people crazy .
I served aboard a submarine .
Sometimes before we left on a deployment we would go through a drill called a " fast cruise' .
We 'd be tied up at the dock , surfaced , but the whole crew would be down below with the hatches shut pretending we were at sea and submerged .
It was absolutely maddening because we knew that air , beer , and babes were separated from us by 2 to 3 inches of steel and that everything we were suffering through was just made-up .
With no real danger and no real mission to concentrate on , we were left to wallow in our misery .
When we were actually on deployment we were submerged for months at a time , which was no picnic , but it was much more bearable than spending 24 hours at the pier .
Part of it was knowing that death lay on the other side of those 2 to 3 inches of steel and that we were in the most comfortable spot out in the middle of nowhere .
There was stress , but that stress was due to real conditions , which is much more tolerable than stress that 's contrived .
With real stress you barely notice conditions like the AC being off while you 're sitting next to a reactor .
When the same thing was being done as a drill , we just sat there sweaty and pissed off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree.
It's my own experience that simulations drive people crazy.
I served aboard a submarine.
Sometimes before we left on a deployment we would go through a drill called a "fast cruise'.
We'd be tied up at the dock, surfaced, but the whole crew would be down below with the hatches shut pretending we were at sea and submerged.
It was absolutely maddening because we knew that air, beer, and babes were separated from us by 2 to 3 inches of steel and that everything we were suffering through was just made-up.
With no real danger and no real mission to concentrate on, we were left to wallow in our misery.
When we were actually on deployment we were submerged for months at a time, which was no picnic, but it was much more bearable than spending 24 hours at the pier.
Part of it was knowing that death lay on the other side of those 2 to 3 inches of steel and that we were in the most comfortable spot out in the middle of nowhere.
There was stress, but that stress was due to real conditions, which is much more tolerable than stress that's contrived.
With real stress you barely notice conditions like the AC being off while you're sitting next to a reactor.
When the same thing was being done as a drill, we just sat there sweaty and pissed off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705899</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1247684100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.</p></div></blockquote><p>Believe it not, that makes it harder rather then easier.  When I was making SSBN patrols for the USN, 'fast cruises' (simulating underway while tied up to the pier) were much harder knowing those things were so close.  Actual patrols were easier because you knew they weren't close and thus weren't nearly so much a distraction.<br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.</p></div></blockquote><p>Which is why they don't let just anyone go, just like the Submarine Service they pick preferentially from the right hand side of the bell curve.  Sure, the occasional loon makes it through screening, but that doesn't disprove the whole concept.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , those 105 people * knew * that just outside the cramped wall was a big , beautiful , receptive planet , with air to breathe , beer to drink , and babes walking around to scope out.Believe it not , that makes it harder rather then easier .
When I was making SSBN patrols for the USN , 'fast cruises ' ( simulating underway while tied up to the pier ) were much harder knowing those things were so close .
Actual patrols were easier because you knew they were n't close and thus were n't nearly so much a distraction .
    Sure , just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while , but we 're not talking about a while , we 're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure .
Many perfectly healthy , strong , capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.Which is why they do n't let just anyone go , just like the Submarine Service they pick preferentially from the right hand side of the bell curve .
Sure , the occasional loon makes it through screening , but that does n't disprove the whole concept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.Believe it not, that makes it harder rather then easier.
When I was making SSBN patrols for the USN, 'fast cruises' (simulating underway while tied up to the pier) were much harder knowing those things were so close.
Actual patrols were easier because you knew they weren't close and thus weren't nearly so much a distraction.
  
  Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure.
Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.Which is why they don't let just anyone go, just like the Submarine Service they pick preferentially from the right hand side of the bell curve.
Sure, the occasional loon makes it through screening, but that doesn't disprove the whole concept.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706831</id>
	<title>Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1247688420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so what? maybe they were simulating stopping at a burger king on the way to mars? i don't see anything wrong with that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>so what ?
maybe they were simulating stopping at a burger king on the way to mars ?
i do n't see anything wrong with that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what?
maybe they were simulating stopping at a burger king on the way to mars?
i don't see anything wrong with that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28720329</id>
	<title>Send Anne Hathaway and Malin Ackerman instead.</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1247772180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft, still smiling after testing<br>&gt; the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars. <b>They</b><br>&gt; <b>had no television or Internet</b>...</p><p>"One of the 'astronauts' exclaimed he was glad to be out because, "Boy, did that place smell like butt!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft , still smiling after testing &gt; the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars .
They &gt; had no television or Internet... " One of the 'astronauts ' exclaimed he was glad to be out because , " Boy , did that place smell like butt !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft, still smiling after testing&gt; the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars.
They&gt; had no television or Internet..."One of the 'astronauts' exclaimed he was glad to be out because, "Boy, did that place smell like butt!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706653</id>
	<title>Twilight Zone</title>
	<author>Crock23A</author>
	<datestamp>1247687700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was an episode of the Twilight Zone where they did this.  It was a year-long test, if I recall correctly and the guy either flipped out or died at the end.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an episode of the Twilight Zone where they did this .
It was a year-long test , if I recall correctly and the guy either flipped out or died at the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was an episode of the Twilight Zone where they did this.
It was a year-long test, if I recall correctly and the guy either flipped out or died at the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708027</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>T.E.D.</author>
	<datestamp>1247650860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks</p></div><p>That would suck. Think about leaving the spacecraft, all exicted about being the first human to set foot on Mars, only to find a media company lawyer there tapping his foot waiting for you with a subpeona.

</p><p>You'd still be the first <em>human</em> to set foot on Mars, but what a letdown.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except , as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation , the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necksThat would suck .
Think about leaving the spacecraft , all exicted about being the first human to set foot on Mars , only to find a media company lawyer there tapping his foot waiting for you with a subpeona .
You 'd still be the first human to set foot on Mars , but what a letdown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necksThat would suck.
Think about leaving the spacecraft, all exicted about being the first human to set foot on Mars, only to find a media company lawyer there tapping his foot waiting for you with a subpeona.
You'd still be the first human to set foot on Mars, but what a letdown.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706499</id>
	<title>Missing Link?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1247687100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better than their first attempt:</p><p>"The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls."</p><p>Moral of the story don't put hot Canadian women on board unless you want all the men to fight over her.</p><p>Hey isn't there a launch today with a Canadian woman on board?</p><p>Nooooooooooooo!</p><p>Also note that this successful attempt was all men, no women at all. Have to wonder if that was on purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better than their first attempt : " The experiment was the second for the institute , whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls .
" Moral of the story do n't put hot Canadian women on board unless you want all the men to fight over her.Hey is n't there a launch today with a Canadian woman on board ? Nooooooooooooo ! Also note that this successful attempt was all men , no women at all .
Have to wonder if that was on purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better than their first attempt:"The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls.
"Moral of the story don't put hot Canadian women on board unless you want all the men to fight over her.Hey isn't there a launch today with a Canadian woman on board?Nooooooooooooo!Also note that this successful attempt was all men, no women at all.
Have to wonder if that was on purpose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708363</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Colourspace</author>
	<datestamp>1247652720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah! Screw trying a simulation first! We all know simulations are *perfect* - so why bother at all? I appreciate what you are saying, but I think you miss the point. Simulations are just that - simulations, and not the real thing. But they at least let you collect a subset of data *before* you try the real thing. You know, so they don't get hot for each other flesh around the van allen belt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
Screw trying a simulation first !
We all know simulations are * perfect * - so why bother at all ?
I appreciate what you are saying , but I think you miss the point .
Simulations are just that - simulations , and not the real thing .
But they at least let you collect a subset of data * before * you try the real thing .
You know , so they do n't get hot for each other flesh around the van allen belt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
Screw trying a simulation first!
We all know simulations are *perfect* - so why bother at all?
I appreciate what you are saying, but I think you miss the point.
Simulations are just that - simulations, and not the real thing.
But they at least let you collect a subset of data *before* you try the real thing.
You know, so they don't get hot for each other flesh around the van allen belt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707431</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>InfiniteZero</author>
	<datestamp>1247691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; No air, no beer, no babes</p><p>I like your sense of priority.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; No air , no beer , no babesI like your sense of priority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; No air, no beer, no babesI like your sense of priority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709887</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>KeensMustard</author>
	<datestamp>1247659680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility, </p></div><p>It might be helpful if you were to demonstrate *why* it would be important. This reasoning seems entirely subjective, and like all subjective reasoning, subject to change. If the astronaut/cosmonaut were to get halfway there and suddenly realise they didn't , after all, really think it was important to go, that would be pretty disruptive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see it differently , and I think the test subject do too : If you 're the first crew to Mars , you know every second that what you 're doing is fucking important , and that you have a special privilege and responsibility , It might be helpful if you were to demonstrate * why * it would be important .
This reasoning seems entirely subjective , and like all subjective reasoning , subject to change .
If the astronaut/cosmonaut were to get halfway there and suddenly realise they did n't , after all , really think it was important to go , that would be pretty disruptive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility, It might be helpful if you were to demonstrate *why* it would be important.
This reasoning seems entirely subjective, and like all subjective reasoning, subject to change.
If the astronaut/cosmonaut were to get halfway there and suddenly realise they didn't , after all, really think it was important to go, that would be pretty disruptive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705851</id>
	<title>Wasn't MIR a much better simulator than this?</title>
	<author>Dr. Spork</author>
	<datestamp>1247683920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, the Mir space station was probably much roomier than any likely Mars spaceship, but it's worth noting that people stayed up there for a year at a time, and there were no fistfights, gropings, or any other such silliness. I'm sure the Russian space agency has reams of psychological data from Mir.<p>The value I see in this is that if you repeat such experiments many times, you can start testing theories about the interaction of certain personality types, and also test theories about choosing optimal group sizes, gender mix, degree of contact with Earth (less might actually be better). Also, I know that Mir cosmonauts frequently got pissed off because they were given too much work. Experiments like this could establish an appropriate threshold for "minimum necessary slack time".</p><p>OK, I take it back - maybe there is a lot to be learned from experiments like this. As a bonus they're absurdly cheap (as a fraction of the total Mars mission cost) and if repeated often enough, they really might help (in unexpected ways) with planning a mission which is least likely to fail.</p><p>(Though it's worth adding that if the actual Mars astronauts got into bloody fistfights and sexually harassed the hot Canadian crewmate, Americans might actually tune in and learn more astronomy sort of by accident. Hmm, maybe Rupert Murdoch should fund the mission and give FOX/Sky broadcast rights to what would surely be the most watched reality show in all of history!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , the Mir space station was probably much roomier than any likely Mars spaceship , but it 's worth noting that people stayed up there for a year at a time , and there were no fistfights , gropings , or any other such silliness .
I 'm sure the Russian space agency has reams of psychological data from Mir.The value I see in this is that if you repeat such experiments many times , you can start testing theories about the interaction of certain personality types , and also test theories about choosing optimal group sizes , gender mix , degree of contact with Earth ( less might actually be better ) .
Also , I know that Mir cosmonauts frequently got pissed off because they were given too much work .
Experiments like this could establish an appropriate threshold for " minimum necessary slack time " .OK , I take it back - maybe there is a lot to be learned from experiments like this .
As a bonus they 're absurdly cheap ( as a fraction of the total Mars mission cost ) and if repeated often enough , they really might help ( in unexpected ways ) with planning a mission which is least likely to fail .
( Though it 's worth adding that if the actual Mars astronauts got into bloody fistfights and sexually harassed the hot Canadian crewmate , Americans might actually tune in and learn more astronomy sort of by accident .
Hmm , maybe Rupert Murdoch should fund the mission and give FOX/Sky broadcast rights to what would surely be the most watched reality show in all of history !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, the Mir space station was probably much roomier than any likely Mars spaceship, but it's worth noting that people stayed up there for a year at a time, and there were no fistfights, gropings, or any other such silliness.
I'm sure the Russian space agency has reams of psychological data from Mir.The value I see in this is that if you repeat such experiments many times, you can start testing theories about the interaction of certain personality types, and also test theories about choosing optimal group sizes, gender mix, degree of contact with Earth (less might actually be better).
Also, I know that Mir cosmonauts frequently got pissed off because they were given too much work.
Experiments like this could establish an appropriate threshold for "minimum necessary slack time".OK, I take it back - maybe there is a lot to be learned from experiments like this.
As a bonus they're absurdly cheap (as a fraction of the total Mars mission cost) and if repeated often enough, they really might help (in unexpected ways) with planning a mission which is least likely to fail.
(Though it's worth adding that if the actual Mars astronauts got into bloody fistfights and sexually harassed the hot Canadian crewmate, Americans might actually tune in and learn more astronomy sort of by accident.
Hmm, maybe Rupert Murdoch should fund the mission and give FOX/Sky broadcast rights to what would surely be the most watched reality show in all of history!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708077</id>
	<title>Re:internal email system?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1247651220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to: Commander Tom<br>fr: Commander Bob<br>subj: Re: Your leg</p><p>That's not my leg! =D</p><p>Bob</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to : Commander Tomfr : Commander Bobsubj : Re : Your legThat 's not my leg !
= DBob</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to: Commander Tomfr: Commander Bobsubj: Re: Your legThat's not my leg!
=DBob</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707445</id>
	<title>laptop + bittorrent?</title>
	<author>thinsoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1247691360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure they could find somebody with 105 days worth of tv &amp; movies on their laptop to lend to the astronauts so they have some entertainment. Surely somebody on slashdot has 365 days worth of porn on an external hard drive they could donate to NASA? If you add in a Kindle for when they're tired of video they can keep completely entertained for the whole trip!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure they could find somebody with 105 days worth of tv &amp; movies on their laptop to lend to the astronauts so they have some entertainment .
Surely somebody on slashdot has 365 days worth of porn on an external hard drive they could donate to NASA ?
If you add in a Kindle for when they 're tired of video they can keep completely entertained for the whole trip !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure they could find somebody with 105 days worth of tv &amp; movies on their laptop to lend to the astronauts so they have some entertainment.
Surely somebody on slashdot has 365 days worth of porn on an external hard drive they could donate to NASA?
If you add in a Kindle for when they're tired of video they can keep completely entertained for the whole trip!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706345</id>
	<title>Why No Internet?</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1247686320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers -- who also monitored them via TV cameras -- and an internal e-mail system. Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why would we subject astronauts to "no Internet"? OK, they couldn't use our "World" -wide apps that depend on low latency. But <i>an</i> "internet" (small "i", not the unified public one) would be a perfect tech to keep their mission LANs communicating with NASA networks on Earth. And making such an internet would be a very valuable product of such a mission. Extending <i>the</i> Internet into space while it's still basically "American style" would be a huge dividend for getting both the Internet and the space colonization global industries (and human endeavors) started and fully under way. America's national interest coinciding with furthering the global interest of everyone already riding the momentum of America's earlier pioneering.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment 's controllers -- who also monitored them via TV cameras -- and an internal e-mail system .
Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight.Why would we subject astronauts to " no Internet " ?
OK , they could n't use our " World " -wide apps that depend on low latency .
But an " internet " ( small " i " , not the unified public one ) would be a perfect tech to keep their mission LANs communicating with NASA networks on Earth .
And making such an internet would be a very valuable product of such a mission .
Extending the Internet into space while it 's still basically " American style " would be a huge dividend for getting both the Internet and the space colonization global industries ( and human endeavors ) started and fully under way .
America 's national interest coinciding with furthering the global interest of everyone already riding the momentum of America 's earlier pioneering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers -- who also monitored them via TV cameras -- and an internal e-mail system.
Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight.Why would we subject astronauts to "no Internet"?
OK, they couldn't use our "World" -wide apps that depend on low latency.
But an "internet" (small "i", not the unified public one) would be a perfect tech to keep their mission LANs communicating with NASA networks on Earth.
And making such an internet would be a very valuable product of such a mission.
Extending the Internet into space while it's still basically "American style" would be a huge dividend for getting both the Internet and the space colonization global industries (and human endeavors) started and fully under way.
America's national interest coinciding with furthering the global interest of everyone already riding the momentum of America's earlier pioneering.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710117</id>
	<title>Redo the test</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1247660880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A better test would be locking the astronauts for 105 days in a small box, letting them out in the middle of the desert of Arizona for 2 weeks and then relocking them for another 105 days. Unless we only care for them to get sane to Mars but we don't really care if they are not sane when they get back to Earth. Unless (2) we're not planning of getting them back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A better test would be locking the astronauts for 105 days in a small box , letting them out in the middle of the desert of Arizona for 2 weeks and then relocking them for another 105 days .
Unless we only care for them to get sane to Mars but we do n't really care if they are not sane when they get back to Earth .
Unless ( 2 ) we 're not planning of getting them back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better test would be locking the astronauts for 105 days in a small box, letting them out in the middle of the desert of Arizona for 2 weeks and then relocking them for another 105 days.
Unless we only care for them to get sane to Mars but we don't really care if they are not sane when they get back to Earth.
Unless (2) we're not planning of getting them back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706133</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Al Al Cool J</author>
	<datestamp>1247685240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure they use people who've got the right... uhm, what do they call that stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure they use people who 've got the right... uhm , what do they call that stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure they use people who've got the right... uhm, what do they call that stuff?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28715195</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247751660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They didn't go insane.</p></div><p>From the article: "<i>Space Cadets</i> was a British <b>television</b> program made by Zeppotron..."<br> <br>Hmmm... Unbiased, accurate, significant scientific research there. Perhaps you're not a good candidate for this mission to Mars; You might confuse the landing system for an old MS Flight Sim game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't go insane.From the article : " Space Cadets was a British television program made by Zeppotron... " Hmmm... Unbiased , accurate , significant scientific research there .
Perhaps you 're not a good candidate for this mission to Mars ; You might confuse the landing system for an old MS Flight Sim game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't go insane.From the article: "Space Cadets was a British television program made by Zeppotron..." Hmmm... Unbiased, accurate, significant scientific research there.
Perhaps you're not a good candidate for this mission to Mars; You might confuse the landing system for an old MS Flight Sim game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706849</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>mistahkurtz</author>
	<datestamp>1247688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!</p></div><p>
i see what you're saying, but i have to disagree some. remember the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford\_prison\_experiment" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">stanford prison experiment</a> [wikipedia.org]? everyone there knew they were part of a study or an experiment, and yet they went well beyond what their described roles were, into some very dark places.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But do not think , even for a moment , that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like !
i see what you 're saying , but i have to disagree some .
remember the stanford prison experiment [ wikipedia.org ] ?
everyone there knew they were part of a study or an experiment , and yet they went well beyond what their described roles were , into some very dark places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!
i see what you're saying, but i have to disagree some.
remember the stanford prison experiment [wikipedia.org]?
everyone there knew they were part of a study or an experiment, and yet they went well beyond what their described roles were, into some very dark places.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707819</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, maybe it doesn't give "meaningful data" on a real Mars trip, but it does represent a lower bound on the stress of a Mars trip. If this had failed, we would have learned something. If it had not failed, then we need to up the ante.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , maybe it does n't give " meaningful data " on a real Mars trip , but it does represent a lower bound on the stress of a Mars trip .
If this had failed , we would have learned something .
If it had not failed , then we need to up the ante .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, maybe it doesn't give "meaningful data" on a real Mars trip, but it does represent a lower bound on the stress of a Mars trip.
If this had failed, we would have learned something.
If it had not failed, then we need to up the ante.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705253</id>
	<title>Perfect enviroment...</title>
	<author>B5\_geek</author>
	<datestamp>1247681640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a perfect marketing opportunity for an E-Book reader.  A device like a Kindle that gets VERY long battery life + can hold MANY books would be the perfect design for the weight conscious space launch, limited electrical supply, and low-bandwidth data link (email).</p><p>If I were to spend 200+ days in transit I would want a lot of reading material.  All duties become dull and repetitive, it's the down-time that will drive a man insane from boredom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a perfect marketing opportunity for an E-Book reader .
A device like a Kindle that gets VERY long battery life + can hold MANY books would be the perfect design for the weight conscious space launch , limited electrical supply , and low-bandwidth data link ( email ) .If I were to spend 200 + days in transit I would want a lot of reading material .
All duties become dull and repetitive , it 's the down-time that will drive a man insane from boredom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a perfect marketing opportunity for an E-Book reader.
A device like a Kindle that gets VERY long battery life + can hold MANY books would be the perfect design for the weight conscious space launch, limited electrical supply, and low-bandwidth data link (email).If I were to spend 200+ days in transit I would want a lot of reading material.
All duties become dull and repetitive, it's the down-time that will drive a man insane from boredom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707763</id>
	<title>Disable gravity, then walk out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disable gravity for 105 days, then walk out of the experiment.<br>THAT will impress me.</p><p>Humans lose muscle very quickly without gravity even if they exercise 2+ hours a day. Walking after 2 weeks is difficult. <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/09/22/astronaut-collapse.html" title="www.cbc.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/09/22/astronaut-collapse.html</a> [www.cbc.ca]  To be clear, these people are fitter than most. The other astronauts were FEELING gravity just as much.  Studies show over 30\% muscle loss after a few months in micro-gravity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disable gravity for 105 days , then walk out of the experiment.THAT will impress me.Humans lose muscle very quickly without gravity even if they exercise 2 + hours a day .
Walking after 2 weeks is difficult .
http : //www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/09/22/astronaut-collapse.html [ www.cbc.ca ] To be clear , these people are fitter than most .
The other astronauts were FEELING gravity just as much .
Studies show over 30 \ % muscle loss after a few months in micro-gravity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disable gravity for 105 days, then walk out of the experiment.THAT will impress me.Humans lose muscle very quickly without gravity even if they exercise 2+ hours a day.
Walking after 2 weeks is difficult.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/09/22/astronaut-collapse.html [www.cbc.ca]  To be clear, these people are fitter than most.
The other astronauts were FEELING gravity just as much.
Studies show over 30\% muscle loss after a few months in micro-gravity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705757</id>
	<title>Re:Psychology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have to understand, though, the psyche of astronauts.  There are two archetypes: Fighter pilots and scientists.  These two types fit into a single archetype: Obsessive.  The first astronauts were fighter pilots and test pilots.  They were cocky, confident, and absolutely attention-whorish (It has to be ME up on that moon).  Then, scientists trickled in.  What type of scientist makes for a good astronaut?  The kind that shrugs off a 10\% chance of death from getting to the lab this morning.  You put these guys in a simulator and they're looking for everything to go wrong.  They want to get to Mars.  They're probably stir-crazy in a simulator, but they have that obsessive eye on the prize.  "This simulator is preparing me to go to Mars."<br> <br>
If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!" and poof!  Problems solved.<br> <br>
For the typical you and me, we aren't QUITE so obsessive.  Our trip to Mars would probably include some measure of space madness, but for the first groups, it's the non-psychological biology that needs to be tested rather than their mental fortitude.  The people on those trips know they've got a 3\% survival rate, and tends to be a very calming experience when volunteered for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to understand , though , the psyche of astronauts .
There are two archetypes : Fighter pilots and scientists .
These two types fit into a single archetype : Obsessive .
The first astronauts were fighter pilots and test pilots .
They were cocky , confident , and absolutely attention-whorish ( It has to be ME up on that moon ) .
Then , scientists trickled in .
What type of scientist makes for a good astronaut ?
The kind that shrugs off a 10 \ % chance of death from getting to the lab this morning .
You put these guys in a simulator and they 're looking for everything to go wrong .
They want to get to Mars .
They 're probably stir-crazy in a simulator , but they have that obsessive eye on the prize .
" This simulator is preparing me to go to Mars .
" If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel , outside of the simulator , all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying " Guys , we 're on our way to MARS !
" and poof !
Problems solved .
For the typical you and me , we are n't QUITE so obsessive .
Our trip to Mars would probably include some measure of space madness , but for the first groups , it 's the non-psychological biology that needs to be tested rather than their mental fortitude .
The people on those trips know they 've got a 3 \ % survival rate , and tends to be a very calming experience when volunteered for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to understand, though, the psyche of astronauts.
There are two archetypes: Fighter pilots and scientists.
These two types fit into a single archetype: Obsessive.
The first astronauts were fighter pilots and test pilots.
They were cocky, confident, and absolutely attention-whorish (It has to be ME up on that moon).
Then, scientists trickled in.
What type of scientist makes for a good astronaut?
The kind that shrugs off a 10\% chance of death from getting to the lab this morning.
You put these guys in a simulator and they're looking for everything to go wrong.
They want to get to Mars.
They're probably stir-crazy in a simulator, but they have that obsessive eye on the prize.
"This simulator is preparing me to go to Mars.
" 
If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!
" and poof!
Problems solved.
For the typical you and me, we aren't QUITE so obsessive.
Our trip to Mars would probably include some measure of space madness, but for the first groups, it's the non-psychological biology that needs to be tested rather than their mental fortitude.
The people on those trips know they've got a 3\% survival rate, and tends to be a very calming experience when volunteered for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705299</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Myrimos</author>
	<datestamp>1247681820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And even our best and brightest... [foxnews.com]</p></div><p>To be fair, I did click the link, but it sure is portrayed in a hilarious way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And even our best and brightest... [ foxnews.com ] To be fair , I did click the link , but it sure is portrayed in a hilarious way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And even our best and brightest... [foxnews.com]To be fair, I did click the link, but it sure is portrayed in a hilarious way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712031</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>bronney</author>
	<datestamp>1247674320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>welcome to Fox River, fish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome to Fox River , fish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome to Fox River, fish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705171</id>
	<title>Isn't the mars mission a 1-Way mission?</title>
	<author>stickrnan</author>
	<datestamp>1247681340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll need to last without these things a lot longer than 105 days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll need to last without these things a lot longer than 105 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll need to last without these things a lot longer than 105 days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708049</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1247650980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's a cool story. Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...</i></p><p>I dunno.  I like Asimov, and I may read this story at some point, and I have to admit I'll be a little disappointed if the denouement doesn't include the phrase "but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a cool story .
Probably would have been cooler if you had n't read this...I dunno .
I like Asimov , and I may read this story at some point , and I have to admit I 'll be a little disappointed if the denouement does n't include the phrase " but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a cool story.
Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...I dunno.
I like Asimov, and I may read this story at some point, and I have to admit I'll be a little disappointed if the denouement doesn't include the phrase "but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712323</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>wondergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247677500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!</p></div><p>Ok, ok, so just put them in a bathysphere, send it to the bottom of Challenger Deep, and pull up the tow line.  Should take care of the stress issue...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But an actual , honest-to-god Mars trip is different , and everybody will know it .
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest , blackest , most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom .
No air , no beer , no babes .
Nothing. And not just some nothing , MILLIONS of miles of nothing .
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight .
Something go wrong ?
Everybody 's dead ! Ok , ok , so just put them in a bathysphere , send it to the bottom of Challenger Deep , and pull up the tow line .
Should take care of the stress issue.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it.
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.
No air, no beer, no babes.
Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing.
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight.
Something go wrong?
Everybody's dead!Ok, ok, so just put them in a bathysphere, send it to the bottom of Challenger Deep, and pull up the tow line.
Should take care of the stress issue...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705901</id>
	<title>Why so cut off?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Curious why the crew was so cut off from TV, Internet, pictures of the natural world, etc?</p><p>Maybe in the trillion dollar Mars exploration plan we should include a couple thousand dollars to equip the vehicle with a DirecTV Dish and keep a relay here on Earth pointed at it, and a couple of screens which can display movies, trees, oceans, water and other nature.</p><p>Internet might be a little harder with the delay, but I see no reason why the crew couldn't be beamed a daily 'cache' of favorite web pages, Earthly news, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Curious why the crew was so cut off from TV , Internet , pictures of the natural world , etc ? Maybe in the trillion dollar Mars exploration plan we should include a couple thousand dollars to equip the vehicle with a DirecTV Dish and keep a relay here on Earth pointed at it , and a couple of screens which can display movies , trees , oceans , water and other nature.Internet might be a little harder with the delay , but I see no reason why the crew could n't be beamed a daily 'cache ' of favorite web pages , Earthly news , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Curious why the crew was so cut off from TV, Internet, pictures of the natural world, etc?Maybe in the trillion dollar Mars exploration plan we should include a couple thousand dollars to equip the vehicle with a DirecTV Dish and keep a relay here on Earth pointed at it, and a couple of screens which can display movies, trees, oceans, water and other nature.Internet might be a little harder with the delay, but I see no reason why the crew couldn't be beamed a daily 'cache' of favorite web pages, Earthly news, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706905</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, the set of people qualified to go to Mars, and the set of people who could be fooled by a hoax like Space Cadets, are about as far apart as the Earth and Mars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , the set of people qualified to go to Mars , and the set of people who could be fooled by a hoax like Space Cadets , are about as far apart as the Earth and Mars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, the set of people qualified to go to Mars, and the set of people who could be fooled by a hoax like Space Cadets, are about as far apart as the Earth and Mars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709871</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1247659620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!</p></div><p>On the flip side, it's not unusual for the crew of a submarine to be underwater for at least 80 days straight, with a similar sense of "if anything goes wrong everybody's dead." Unlike a submarine crew, a Mars crew would also have regular contact with the world back home.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But an actual , honest-to-god Mars trip is different , and everybody will know it .
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest , blackest , most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom .
No air , no beer , no babes .
Nothing. And not just some nothing , MILLIONS of miles of nothing .
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight .
Something go wrong ?
Everybody 's dead ! On the flip side , it 's not unusual for the crew of a submarine to be underwater for at least 80 days straight , with a similar sense of " if anything goes wrong everybody 's dead .
" Unlike a submarine crew , a Mars crew would also have regular contact with the world back home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it.
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.
No air, no beer, no babes.
Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing.
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight.
Something go wrong?
Everybody's dead!On the flip side, it's not unusual for the crew of a submarine to be underwater for at least 80 days straight, with a similar sense of "if anything goes wrong everybody's dead.
" Unlike a submarine crew, a Mars crew would also have regular contact with the world back home.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711727</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247671800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really mean no offense by this to you personally. But I would like to point out that in your situation on the sub, everyone was military. I'm thinking of the people I know who joined various branches of the military. They tended to be the ones who would do things like put another human beings head in a toilet for their own amusement if you know what I mean. In addition to this self-selection, military organizations seem to have an overall bully mentality. People selected for a Mars mission might very well have quite different personality profiles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really mean no offense by this to you personally .
But I would like to point out that in your situation on the sub , everyone was military .
I 'm thinking of the people I know who joined various branches of the military .
They tended to be the ones who would do things like put another human beings head in a toilet for their own amusement if you know what I mean .
In addition to this self-selection , military organizations seem to have an overall bully mentality .
People selected for a Mars mission might very well have quite different personality profiles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really mean no offense by this to you personally.
But I would like to point out that in your situation on the sub, everyone was military.
I'm thinking of the people I know who joined various branches of the military.
They tended to be the ones who would do things like put another human beings head in a toilet for their own amusement if you know what I mean.
In addition to this self-selection, military organizations seem to have an overall bully mentality.
People selected for a Mars mission might very well have quite different personality profiles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706405</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247686680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, the sheer fact that you linked to foxnews in your comments made anything you say completely unreliable.  Better luck next time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , the sheer fact that you linked to foxnews in your comments made anything you say completely unreliable .
Better luck next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, the sheer fact that you linked to foxnews in your comments made anything you say completely unreliable.
Better luck next time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710125</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1247660940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.</p></div><p>Many people have a lot of reasons to be on their best behavior, and many people have a lot of reasons to be on their worst behavior.  That rarely stops many people from doing what they want to do or feel like doing...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.Many people have a lot of reasons to be on their best behavior , and many people have a lot of reasons to be on their worst behavior .
That rarely stops many people from doing what they want to do or feel like doing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.Many people have a lot of reasons to be on their best behavior, and many people have a lot of reasons to be on their worst behavior.
That rarely stops many people from doing what they want to do or feel like doing...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707565</id>
	<title>Easy!</title>
	<author>msormune</author>
	<datestamp>1247648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I could do that, as long as there were Internet and beer. Wait what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could do that , as long as there were Internet and beer .
Wait what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I could do that, as long as there were Internet and beer.
Wait what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Dr. Spork</author>
	<datestamp>1247682360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility, and that the whole world is watching you. I think it's pretty likely that under such circumstances the dude wouldn't have tried to fondle the hot Canadian chick. You'd keep a lid on it.</p><p> Contrast that to an experiment where you basically have five people in railroad car undergoing isolation torture with dubious scientific value. Then you realize "you know, if I have nice bloody fistfight with Sergey, they'll cancel this stupid experiment, let me go home, and the jerk might even lose a tooth like he deserves to. All signs point to yes."</p><p>
So in summary, I'm saying that a real crew on its way to the actual planet Mars has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see it differently , and I think the test subject do too : If you 're the first crew to Mars , you know every second that what you 're doing is fucking important , and that you have a special privilege and responsibility , and that the whole world is watching you .
I think it 's pretty likely that under such circumstances the dude would n't have tried to fondle the hot Canadian chick .
You 'd keep a lid on it .
Contrast that to an experiment where you basically have five people in railroad car undergoing isolation torture with dubious scientific value .
Then you realize " you know , if I have nice bloody fistfight with Sergey , they 'll cancel this stupid experiment , let me go home , and the jerk might even lose a tooth like he deserves to .
All signs point to yes .
" So in summary , I 'm saying that a real crew on its way to the actual planet Mars has many more reasons to be on their best behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility, and that the whole world is watching you.
I think it's pretty likely that under such circumstances the dude wouldn't have tried to fondle the hot Canadian chick.
You'd keep a lid on it.
Contrast that to an experiment where you basically have five people in railroad car undergoing isolation torture with dubious scientific value.
Then you realize "you know, if I have nice bloody fistfight with Sergey, they'll cancel this stupid experiment, let me go home, and the jerk might even lose a tooth like he deserves to.
All signs point to yes.
"
So in summary, I'm saying that a real crew on its way to the actual planet Mars has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710635</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1247663760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're kidding, right?
</p><p>The engineering solution to the psychology problem is to put some mutually agreeable and compatible people in the capsule and launch it.  People are mission critical component and a good engineer doesn't fight the properties of his materials.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're kidding , right ?
The engineering solution to the psychology problem is to put some mutually agreeable and compatible people in the capsule and launch it .
People are mission critical component and a good engineer does n't fight the properties of his materials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're kidding, right?
The engineering solution to the psychology problem is to put some mutually agreeable and compatible people in the capsule and launch it.
People are mission critical component and a good engineer doesn't fight the properties of his materials.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711945</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>countach</author>
	<datestamp>1247673600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy, take beer and babes with you in the space ship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy , take beer and babes with you in the space ship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy, take beer and babes with you in the space ship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706375</id>
	<title>Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days</title>
	<author>SuiteSisterMary</author>
	<datestamp>1247686500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True, but deep down, you still knew that if needs *really really* must, you were a few minutes from surfacing, and at most, a day or two from home.</p><p>50 days into that trip to Mars, on the other hand....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True , but deep down , you still knew that if needs * really really * must , you were a few minutes from surfacing , and at most , a day or two from home.50 days into that trip to Mars , on the other hand... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, but deep down, you still knew that if needs *really really* must, you were a few minutes from surfacing, and at most, a day or two from home.50 days into that trip to Mars, on the other hand....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707257</id>
	<title>Intimate human contact</title>
	<author>Theovon</author>
	<datestamp>1247690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how well the space agencies are taking into consideration human need for intimate contact.  NASA crews at least get some scheduled parts of the day when they get privacy and are disconnected from health monitors.  But this is for relatively short missions.  Unsatisfied sexual needs can create tension, especially in situations of extreme isolation with no way out.  Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how well the space agencies are taking into consideration human need for intimate contact .
NASA crews at least get some scheduled parts of the day when they get privacy and are disconnected from health monitors .
But this is for relatively short missions .
Unsatisfied sexual needs can create tension , especially in situations of extreme isolation with no way out .
Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how well the space agencies are taking into consideration human need for intimate contact.
NASA crews at least get some scheduled parts of the day when they get privacy and are disconnected from health monitors.
But this is for relatively short missions.
Unsatisfied sexual needs can create tension, especially in situations of extreme isolation with no way out.
Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707733</id>
	<title>One hell of a reality TV show</title>
	<author>techstar25</author>
	<datestamp>1247649600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"This is the true story... of six strangers... picked to live in a space shuttle...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real Mars." Coming to MTV, Fall of 2031.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" This is the true story... of six strangers... picked to live in a space shuttle...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real Mars .
" Coming to MTV , Fall of 2031 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This is the true story... of six strangers... picked to live in a space shuttle...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real Mars.
" Coming to MTV, Fall of 2031.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705167</id>
	<title>Homer Says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No tv and no internet, make Homer.... Something Something =-p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No tv and no internet , make Homer.... Something Something = -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No tv and no internet, make Homer.... Something Something =-p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705239</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>Bigby</author>
	<datestamp>1247681580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Luckily they bring the ladies along; that eliminates the need for the Internet and TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Luckily they bring the ladies along ; that eliminates the need for the Internet and TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luckily they bring the ladies along; that eliminates the need for the Internet and TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891</id>
	<title>internal email system?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247684040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to: Commander Bob<br>fr: Commander Tom<br>subj: Your leg</p><p>Hi Bob, could you move your leg? It's blocking my mouth.</p><p>Thanks, Tom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to : Commander Bobfr : Commander Tomsubj : Your legHi Bob , could you move your leg ?
It 's blocking my mouth.Thanks , Tom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to: Commander Bobfr: Commander Tomsubj: Your legHi Bob, could you move your leg?
It's blocking my mouth.Thanks, Tom</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706801</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1247688360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, those 105 days might have been hell...   is that 105 days one way or round trip ??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , those 105 days might have been hell... is that 105 days one way or round trip ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, those 105 days might have been hell...   is that 105 days one way or round trip ?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215</id>
	<title>Better bring a game or two</title>
	<author>Uther2000</author>
	<datestamp>1247681460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like they should add an Xbox360 or a PS3 to the supply list.

They can practice their hand-to-eye coordination just in case of hostile little-green-men</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they should add an Xbox360 or a PS3 to the supply list .
They can practice their hand-to-eye coordination just in case of hostile little-green-men</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they should add an Xbox360 or a PS3 to the supply list.
They can practice their hand-to-eye coordination just in case of hostile little-green-men</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711337</id>
	<title>Russian time compression technology</title>
	<author>4181</author>
	<datestamp>1247669040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real news was hidden deep in the article:<blockquote><div><p>officials<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news was hidden deep in the article : officials ... promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news was hidden deep in the article:officials ... promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28716091</id>
	<title>The Hollywood Version</title>
	<author>Agripa</author>
	<datestamp>1247756280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[making video diary entry] I do not like the men on this spaceship. They are uncouth and fail to appreciate my better qualities. I have something of value to contribute to this mission if they would only recognize it. Today over lunch I tried to improve morale and build a sense of camaraderie among the men by holding a humorous, round-robin discussion of the early days of the mission. My overtures were brutally rejected. These men do not want a happy ship. They are deeply sick and try to compensate by making me feel miserable. Last week was my birthday. Nobody even said "happy birthday" to me. Someday this tape will be played and then they'll feel sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ making video diary entry ] I do not like the men on this spaceship .
They are uncouth and fail to appreciate my better qualities .
I have something of value to contribute to this mission if they would only recognize it .
Today over lunch I tried to improve morale and build a sense of camaraderie among the men by holding a humorous , round-robin discussion of the early days of the mission .
My overtures were brutally rejected .
These men do not want a happy ship .
They are deeply sick and try to compensate by making me feel miserable .
Last week was my birthday .
Nobody even said " happy birthday " to me .
Someday this tape will be played and then they 'll feel sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[making video diary entry] I do not like the men on this spaceship.
They are uncouth and fail to appreciate my better qualities.
I have something of value to contribute to this mission if they would only recognize it.
Today over lunch I tried to improve morale and build a sense of camaraderie among the men by holding a humorous, round-robin discussion of the early days of the mission.
My overtures were brutally rejected.
These men do not want a happy ship.
They are deeply sick and try to compensate by making me feel miserable.
Last week was my birthday.
Nobody even said "happy birthday" to me.
Someday this tape will be played and then they'll feel sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1247686740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_Cadets" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_Cadets</a> [wikipedia.org]

Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience). The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength. They didn't go insane.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space \ _Cadets [ wikipedia.org ] Yes , they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space ( until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience ) .
The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength .
They did n't go insane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_Cadets [wikipedia.org]

Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience).
The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength.
They didn't go insane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705297</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't the mars mission a 1-Way mission?</title>
	<author>MinistryOfTruthiness</author>
	<datestamp>1247681820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think point of this experiment was just to see if they would murder each other on the way. 105 days stuck in a little space with 5 other people and few diversions leaves a lot up to the social dynamics between the people involved. They need to know what sorts of things to prepare for along the way.</p><p>For example, they might expect that boredom would be the major problem, but it winds up being B.O.  If they know that, they can stock up on deodorants. Point being, by doing experiments like this, they can test their assumptions about the social interactions and try to mitigate any unexpected points of contention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think point of this experiment was just to see if they would murder each other on the way .
105 days stuck in a little space with 5 other people and few diversions leaves a lot up to the social dynamics between the people involved .
They need to know what sorts of things to prepare for along the way.For example , they might expect that boredom would be the major problem , but it winds up being B.O .
If they know that , they can stock up on deodorants .
Point being , by doing experiments like this , they can test their assumptions about the social interactions and try to mitigate any unexpected points of contention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think point of this experiment was just to see if they would murder each other on the way.
105 days stuck in a little space with 5 other people and few diversions leaves a lot up to the social dynamics between the people involved.
They need to know what sorts of things to prepare for along the way.For example, they might expect that boredom would be the major problem, but it winds up being B.O.
If they know that, they can stock up on deodorants.
Point being, by doing experiments like this, they can test their assumptions about the social interactions and try to mitigate any unexpected points of contention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707027</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247689320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing.</i></p><p>Perhaps we should be sending<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posters to Mars, then.  They'll feel right at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No air , no beer , no babes .
Nothing.Perhaps we should be sending / .
posters to Mars , then .
They 'll feel right at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No air, no beer, no babes.
Nothing.Perhaps we should be sending /.
posters to Mars, then.
They'll feel right at home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what we should do is put people in a " mock spacecraft " for a " test " and launch them towards Mars .
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars.
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705219</id>
	<title>Seventh Missing Occupant: +1, Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is named <a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;cf=all&amp;ncl=d3MpAwj6VVEr2VMDvSODASNeEj8vM" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Richard B. Cheney: War Criminal</a> [google.com].</p><p>Yours In Justice,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is named Richard B. Cheney : War Criminal [ google.com ] .Yours In Justice,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is named Richard B. Cheney: War Criminal [google.com].Yours In Justice,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28717759</id>
	<title>Red Mars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247763000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a trilogy about mars colonization starting with Red Mars.</p><p>How did they deal with the trip out?  They brought 50 men and 50 women so they would have something to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a trilogy about mars colonization starting with Red Mars.How did they deal with the trip out ?
They brought 50 men and 50 women so they would have something to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a trilogy about mars colonization starting with Red Mars.How did they deal with the trip out?
They brought 50 men and 50 women so they would have something to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705441</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, DVR?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.</p></div><p>Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks, complaining to their congresspeople about how much more important their anti-piracy efforts are over scientific discovery, cosmic exploration, and our astronauts not going insane during a nearly one-third year flight.  And then they'd add a few extra trillion in to the "potential lost sales" figures they flaunt due to the Martians the astronauts would potentially be sharing the movies with who would then not buy the movies.</p><p>Then they'd bitch about making sure there's DRM on the spacecraft (jacking up the price and complexity) and make excuses that a 40-minute round-trip communication back to the central servers on earth every X minutes of playback is a perfectly reasonable compromise to make "sure" it doesn't fall into the wrong hands, and would try their damndest to delay the launch until they could convince the entire judicial branch of the United States government to quite cheerfully treat the astronauts like potential criminals.</p><p>I mean, other than THAT, it'd be a perfectly reasonable idea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.Except , as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation , the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks , complaining to their congresspeople about how much more important their anti-piracy efforts are over scientific discovery , cosmic exploration , and our astronauts not going insane during a nearly one-third year flight .
And then they 'd add a few extra trillion in to the " potential lost sales " figures they flaunt due to the Martians the astronauts would potentially be sharing the movies with who would then not buy the movies.Then they 'd bitch about making sure there 's DRM on the spacecraft ( jacking up the price and complexity ) and make excuses that a 40-minute round-trip communication back to the central servers on earth every X minutes of playback is a perfectly reasonable compromise to make " sure " it does n't fall into the wrong hands , and would try their damndest to delay the launch until they could convince the entire judicial branch of the United States government to quite cheerfully treat the astronauts like potential criminals.I mean , other than THAT , it 'd be a perfectly reasonable idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks, complaining to their congresspeople about how much more important their anti-piracy efforts are over scientific discovery, cosmic exploration, and our astronauts not going insane during a nearly one-third year flight.
And then they'd add a few extra trillion in to the "potential lost sales" figures they flaunt due to the Martians the astronauts would potentially be sharing the movies with who would then not buy the movies.Then they'd bitch about making sure there's DRM on the spacecraft (jacking up the price and complexity) and make excuses that a 40-minute round-trip communication back to the central servers on earth every X minutes of playback is a perfectly reasonable compromise to make "sure" it doesn't fall into the wrong hands, and would try their damndest to delay the launch until they could convince the entire judicial branch of the United States government to quite cheerfully treat the astronauts like potential criminals.I mean, other than THAT, it'd be a perfectly reasonable idea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705835</id>
	<title>Re:Better bring a game or two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mars Journal Day 4:<br>Turned on XB360 and got the RROD... f***k</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mars Journal Day 4 : Turned on XB360 and got the RROD... f * * * k</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mars Journal Day 4:Turned on XB360 and got the RROD... f***k</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711843</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247672760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that you assume that there would be reasonable behavior going on. ^^</p><p>Reason and making sense has nothing to do with what usually makes such things go wrong.</p><p>It's deepest psychology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that you assume that there would be reasonable behavior going on .
^ ^ Reason and making sense has nothing to do with what usually makes such things go wrong.It 's deepest psychology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that you assume that there would be reasonable behavior going on.
^^Reason and making sense has nothing to do with what usually makes such things go wrong.It's deepest psychology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706299</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>McGregorMortis</author>
	<datestamp>1247686140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isaac Asimov wrote a short story along those lines.  I can't remember the title.  Massive spoilers here, though you can probably guess what they are just from the context of this reply...</p><p>It's set in a space capsule on the way to the moon (it was written before the Apollo landings.)  One of the men starts going kinda loopy during the long isolation, gets crazy ideas about Man's place in the universe, maybe it's all a big trick.  When they finally reach the moon and start coming around to the dark side, which had never before been seen by human eyes, they see that the entire moon is just a gigantic stage prop with wooden struts and fabric stretched over it.  The guy goes insane and tries to kill the others to keep the secret.</p><p>Turns out the entire trip was actually a simulation, conducted in a research facility on Earth, though the crew didn't know it.  The image of the moon they saw from their viewport was actually generated using a scale model of the moon and a tracking camera.  The simulation was supposed to end before the camera came around to the far side of the moon, but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something.</p><p>It's a cool story.  Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Isaac Asimov wrote a short story along those lines .
I ca n't remember the title .
Massive spoilers here , though you can probably guess what they are just from the context of this reply...It 's set in a space capsule on the way to the moon ( it was written before the Apollo landings .
) One of the men starts going kinda loopy during the long isolation , gets crazy ideas about Man 's place in the universe , maybe it 's all a big trick .
When they finally reach the moon and start coming around to the dark side , which had never before been seen by human eyes , they see that the entire moon is just a gigantic stage prop with wooden struts and fabric stretched over it .
The guy goes insane and tries to kill the others to keep the secret.Turns out the entire trip was actually a simulation , conducted in a research facility on Earth , though the crew did n't know it .
The image of the moon they saw from their viewport was actually generated using a scale model of the moon and a tracking camera .
The simulation was supposed to end before the camera came around to the far side of the moon , but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something.It 's a cool story .
Probably would have been cooler if you had n't read this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isaac Asimov wrote a short story along those lines.
I can't remember the title.
Massive spoilers here, though you can probably guess what they are just from the context of this reply...It's set in a space capsule on the way to the moon (it was written before the Apollo landings.
)  One of the men starts going kinda loopy during the long isolation, gets crazy ideas about Man's place in the universe, maybe it's all a big trick.
When they finally reach the moon and start coming around to the dark side, which had never before been seen by human eyes, they see that the entire moon is just a gigantic stage prop with wooden struts and fabric stretched over it.
The guy goes insane and tries to kill the others to keep the secret.Turns out the entire trip was actually a simulation, conducted in a research facility on Earth, though the crew didn't know it.
The image of the moon they saw from their viewport was actually generated using a scale model of the moon and a tracking camera.
The simulation was supposed to end before the camera came around to the far side of the moon, but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something.It's a cool story.
Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah yeah Mars...anyone can do that. 105 days with no TV or internet?</p><p>I, for one, welcome our godlike astronaut overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah yeah Mars...anyone can do that .
105 days with no TV or internet ? I , for one , welcome our godlike astronaut overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah yeah Mars...anyone can do that.
105 days with no TV or internet?I, for one, welcome our godlike astronaut overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707441</id>
	<title>Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months</title>
	<author>Jogar the Barbarian</author>
	<datestamp>1247691360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the glacial pace we're going now, by the time we're ready to actually launch folks to Mars, we should have a workable ion drive or plasma drive or Russian Reversal drive. Heck, we've known ion drives work for over a decade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the glacial pace we 're going now , by the time we 're ready to actually launch folks to Mars , we should have a workable ion drive or plasma drive or Russian Reversal drive .
Heck , we 've known ion drives work for over a decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the glacial pace we're going now, by the time we're ready to actually launch folks to Mars, we should have a workable ion drive or plasma drive or Russian Reversal drive.
Heck, we've known ion drives work for over a decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706417</id>
	<title>so its set then,</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1247686680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if my insight into the delay is correct, we're set to use microsoft Exchange for interstellar email.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if my insight into the delay is correct , we 're set to use microsoft Exchange for interstellar email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if my insight into the delay is correct, we're set to use microsoft Exchange for interstellar email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</id>
	<title>Physchology</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1247681460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Living in cramped quarters with a few other people for 105 days is not so big a deal. Reality would likely be far different. See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out. They are a day-flight away from home, wherever it be. Something go wrong? Darn, too bad. Simulation over, everybody have a beer and go home!</p><p>But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!</p><p>Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure. And even our best and brightest <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250415,00.html" title="foxnews.com">crack under the pressure</a> [foxnews.com] of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!</p><p>The simulation is more of a publicity stunt, and it's appropriate. People want to try the trip, and that's A-OK. But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Living in cramped quarters with a few other people for 105 days is not so big a deal .
Reality would likely be far different .
See , those 105 people * knew * that just outside the cramped wall was a big , beautiful , receptive planet , with air to breathe , beer to drink , and babes walking around to scope out .
They are a day-flight away from home , wherever it be .
Something go wrong ?
Darn , too bad .
Simulation over , everybody have a beer and go home ! But an actual , honest-to-god Mars trip is different , and everybody will know it .
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest , blackest , most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom .
No air , no beer , no babes .
Nothing. And not just some nothing , MILLIONS of miles of nothing .
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight .
Something go wrong ?
Everybody 's dead ! Sure , just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while , but we 're not talking about a while , we 're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure .
Many perfectly healthy , strong , capable people would crack under this kind of pressure .
And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [ foxnews.com ] of living here on Earth , with lots of air , beer , and pretty babes ! The simulation is more of a publicity stunt , and it 's appropriate .
People want to try the trip , and that 's A-OK. But do not think , even for a moment , that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Living in cramped quarters with a few other people for 105 days is not so big a deal.
Reality would likely be far different.
See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.
They are a day-flight away from home, wherever it be.
Something go wrong?
Darn, too bad.
Simulation over, everybody have a beer and go home!But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it.
Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.
No air, no beer, no babes.
Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing.
Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight.
Something go wrong?
Everybody's dead!Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure.
Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.
And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [foxnews.com] of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!The simulation is more of a publicity stunt, and it's appropriate.
People want to try the trip, and that's A-OK. But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706373</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>snspdaarf</author>
	<datestamp>1247686500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We could name it "Project Magic Christian."</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could name it " Project Magic Christian .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could name it "Project Magic Christian.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706789</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>true. the closest you can come to the real thing while staying on earth is to do it deep, deep under water, because down there there's no beer, no babes, and instead of the endless void, there's endless pressure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>true .
the closest you can come to the real thing while staying on earth is to do it deep , deep under water , because down there there 's no beer , no babes , and instead of the endless void , there 's endless pressure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>true.
the closest you can come to the real thing while staying on earth is to do it deep, deep under water, because down there there's no beer, no babes, and instead of the endless void, there's endless pressure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707291</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Like2Byte</author>
	<datestamp>1247690700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read your response and I liked it....mostly.</p><p>Lest anyone disagree, he's pretty damn accurate. I'm a former submariner. I've lived through fires, suicides (not me, silly!) and other casualties that really scared the personnel and myself on board my submarine. Let's focus on what scared the shit out of me. Floating in the middle of the ocean with no hydraulic pressure to steer the ship, no hydraulics to open and close critical valve's to safety-of-ship systems, limited fuel and using reactor power is now out of the question, bobbing on the ocean for three full days in heavy sea state. Since the reactor was placed in a 'safe' state, we used our diesel engine (yes, just 1!) to power critical systems. Limited lighting and ventilation only.</p><p>None of us were too sure if we'd make it back alive and/or in one piece. The only thing we had going for us is that we could still pull fresh oxygen into the boat. Oh, and the captain secured drills for the remainder of the cruise. He always made us run drills. Always except this time.</p><p>We had it made.</p><p>Now for the 'mostly' part. And this is the fun stuff.</p><p>You got 6 guys here who basically 'behaved' during the simulation. Wait till 60 days begins to set in. They'll start screwing with each other's minds. Trust me.</p><p>We used to lock people in their bunks by raising the hinged bunk and placing the support bar in its lock to keep it raised at 45 deg with the victim in it. For our astro buddies, Straps to keep you in your bunk will strangely become stuck with another victim in them.</p><p>Personal items will be held for ransom by some unknown assailant. Pictures will be posted of said personal item every few weeks. Sometimes with pieces of it missing, often being torn off of it...violently. Sometimes there are doubles of the items so as not to really destroy the object. Other times it's the real thing and your personal device is being destroyed!</p><p>Food will be contaminated. That's all I'm saying.</p><p>Why beat and a man down when you can slowly enjoy watch him tear himself apart because of the things that are subversively committed against him.</p><p>I'm no prophet here; but, I'm sure that as space travel becomes routine there are people that are going to enjoy tormenting others endlessly. Just like here on Earth. Ah, smell that fresh air.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read your response and I liked it....mostly.Lest anyone disagree , he 's pretty damn accurate .
I 'm a former submariner .
I 've lived through fires , suicides ( not me , silly !
) and other casualties that really scared the personnel and myself on board my submarine .
Let 's focus on what scared the shit out of me .
Floating in the middle of the ocean with no hydraulic pressure to steer the ship , no hydraulics to open and close critical valve 's to safety-of-ship systems , limited fuel and using reactor power is now out of the question , bobbing on the ocean for three full days in heavy sea state .
Since the reactor was placed in a 'safe ' state , we used our diesel engine ( yes , just 1 !
) to power critical systems .
Limited lighting and ventilation only.None of us were too sure if we 'd make it back alive and/or in one piece .
The only thing we had going for us is that we could still pull fresh oxygen into the boat .
Oh , and the captain secured drills for the remainder of the cruise .
He always made us run drills .
Always except this time.We had it made.Now for the 'mostly ' part .
And this is the fun stuff.You got 6 guys here who basically 'behaved ' during the simulation .
Wait till 60 days begins to set in .
They 'll start screwing with each other 's minds .
Trust me.We used to lock people in their bunks by raising the hinged bunk and placing the support bar in its lock to keep it raised at 45 deg with the victim in it .
For our astro buddies , Straps to keep you in your bunk will strangely become stuck with another victim in them.Personal items will be held for ransom by some unknown assailant .
Pictures will be posted of said personal item every few weeks .
Sometimes with pieces of it missing , often being torn off of it...violently .
Sometimes there are doubles of the items so as not to really destroy the object .
Other times it 's the real thing and your personal device is being destroyed ! Food will be contaminated .
That 's all I 'm saying.Why beat and a man down when you can slowly enjoy watch him tear himself apart because of the things that are subversively committed against him.I 'm no prophet here ; but , I 'm sure that as space travel becomes routine there are people that are going to enjoy tormenting others endlessly .
Just like here on Earth .
Ah , smell that fresh air .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read your response and I liked it....mostly.Lest anyone disagree, he's pretty damn accurate.
I'm a former submariner.
I've lived through fires, suicides (not me, silly!
) and other casualties that really scared the personnel and myself on board my submarine.
Let's focus on what scared the shit out of me.
Floating in the middle of the ocean with no hydraulic pressure to steer the ship, no hydraulics to open and close critical valve's to safety-of-ship systems, limited fuel and using reactor power is now out of the question, bobbing on the ocean for three full days in heavy sea state.
Since the reactor was placed in a 'safe' state, we used our diesel engine (yes, just 1!
) to power critical systems.
Limited lighting and ventilation only.None of us were too sure if we'd make it back alive and/or in one piece.
The only thing we had going for us is that we could still pull fresh oxygen into the boat.
Oh, and the captain secured drills for the remainder of the cruise.
He always made us run drills.
Always except this time.We had it made.Now for the 'mostly' part.
And this is the fun stuff.You got 6 guys here who basically 'behaved' during the simulation.
Wait till 60 days begins to set in.
They'll start screwing with each other's minds.
Trust me.We used to lock people in their bunks by raising the hinged bunk and placing the support bar in its lock to keep it raised at 45 deg with the victim in it.
For our astro buddies, Straps to keep you in your bunk will strangely become stuck with another victim in them.Personal items will be held for ransom by some unknown assailant.
Pictures will be posted of said personal item every few weeks.
Sometimes with pieces of it missing, often being torn off of it...violently.
Sometimes there are doubles of the items so as not to really destroy the object.
Other times it's the real thing and your personal device is being destroyed!Food will be contaminated.
That's all I'm saying.Why beat and a man down when you can slowly enjoy watch him tear himself apart because of the things that are subversively committed against him.I'm no prophet here; but, I'm sure that as space travel becomes routine there are people that are going to enjoy tormenting others endlessly.
Just like here on Earth.
Ah, smell that fresh air.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707611</id>
	<title>Excessive?</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1247648940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think their test was excessive. The real travelers will have access to "television" and "internet". The latency will just suck nuts and the bandwidth won't be too awesome either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think their test was excessive .
The real travelers will have access to " television " and " internet " .
The latency will just suck nuts and the bandwidth wo n't be too awesome either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think their test was excessive.
The real travelers will have access to "television" and "internet".
The latency will just suck nuts and the bandwidth won't be too awesome either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706363</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Veggiesama</author>
	<datestamp>1247686440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't a British reality TV show do something like that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't a British reality TV show do something like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't a British reality TV show do something like that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706935</id>
	<title>Re:Homer Says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go crazy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go crazy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go crazy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711821</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247672580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't yo just get used to the void, after some time?</p><p>Oh, and I won't click on a foxnews.com link for the life of me. There is nothing to learn from that site except for sensationalist and extremist lies and irrelevancies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't yo just get used to the void , after some time ? Oh , and I wo n't click on a foxnews.com link for the life of me .
There is nothing to learn from that site except for sensationalist and extremist lies and irrelevancies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't yo just get used to the void, after some time?Oh, and I won't click on a foxnews.com link for the life of me.
There is nothing to learn from that site except for sensationalist and extremist lies and irrelevancies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705973</id>
	<title>Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't have to take a Hohmann trajectory.  That is the least energy path, but not the only path.  If we spent the money on better propulsion and more fuel, they'd get their sooner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't have to take a Hohmann trajectory .
That is the least energy path , but not the only path .
If we spent the money on better propulsion and more fuel , they 'd get their sooner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't have to take a Hohmann trajectory.
That is the least energy path, but not the only path.
If we spent the money on better propulsion and more fuel, they'd get their sooner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708589</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and we all know people always act rationally...</p><p>In fact, that's just what this experiment was designed to find out, wasn't it? How people would react? People here on Slashdot seem to have this automatic assumption that the experiment would be successful only if those folks actually managed the full 105 days, but that's not true.</p><p>Let me stress that: this sort of study isn't a computer game. No outcome is, a priori, "good" or "bad"; they all lead to further insights. Nobody's trying to get a specific result.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and we all know people always act rationally...In fact , that 's just what this experiment was designed to find out , was n't it ?
How people would react ?
People here on Slashdot seem to have this automatic assumption that the experiment would be successful only if those folks actually managed the full 105 days , but that 's not true.Let me stress that : this sort of study is n't a computer game .
No outcome is , a priori , " good " or " bad " ; they all lead to further insights .
Nobody 's trying to get a specific result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and we all know people always act rationally...In fact, that's just what this experiment was designed to find out, wasn't it?
How people would react?
People here on Slashdot seem to have this automatic assumption that the experiment would be successful only if those folks actually managed the full 105 days, but that's not true.Let me stress that: this sort of study isn't a computer game.
No outcome is, a priori, "good" or "bad"; they all lead to further insights.
Nobody's trying to get a specific result.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713523</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1247775480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More likely they'll just put a ship in orbit or perhaps moon orbit for 105 days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely they 'll just put a ship in orbit or perhaps moon orbit for 105 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely they'll just put a ship in orbit or perhaps moon orbit for 105 days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707049</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>dasunt</author>
	<datestamp>1247689500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!</p></div></blockquote><p>
There was an old SF short story about a similarly fake moon mission.
</p><p>
The "ship" went off course and managed to give the "astronauts" a glimps of the dark side of the moon -- which ended up being obviously a wooden prop.
</p><p>
One of the men went insane.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what we should do is put people in a " mock spacecraft " for a " test " and launch them towards Mars .
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise ! There was an old SF short story about a similarly fake moon mission .
The " ship " went off course and managed to give the " astronauts " a glimps of the dark side of the moon -- which ended up being obviously a wooden prop .
One of the men went insane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars.
At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!
There was an old SF short story about a similarly fake moon mission.
The "ship" went off course and managed to give the "astronauts" a glimps of the dark side of the moon -- which ended up being obviously a wooden prop.
One of the men went insane.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707207</id>
	<title>Space dogged</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247690280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All i could think of when i read the headline was "Ren and Stimpy - Space Dogged" http://www.joost.com/079000m/t/Ren-and-Stimpy-Space-Dogged-Feud-for-Sale#id=079000m</p><p>167 days of isolation without food or water<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All i could think of when i read the headline was " Ren and Stimpy - Space Dogged " http : //www.joost.com/079000m/t/Ren-and-Stimpy-Space-Dogged-Feud-for-Sale # id = 079000m167 days of isolation without food or water : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All i could think of when i read the headline was "Ren and Stimpy - Space Dogged" http://www.joost.com/079000m/t/Ren-and-Stimpy-Space-Dogged-Feud-for-Sale#id=079000m167 days of isolation without food or water :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705921</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1247684220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty sure i'd be more of a quitter part way on some stupid experiment on earth than I would in space. Even if it was just that there is no oxygen outside so you CAN'T quit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty sure i 'd be more of a quitter part way on some stupid experiment on earth than I would in space .
Even if it was just that there is no oxygen outside so you CA N'T quit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty sure i'd be more of a quitter part way on some stupid experiment on earth than I would in space.
Even if it was just that there is no oxygen outside so you CAN'T quit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708537</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>cenc</author>
	<datestamp>1247653560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is likly most similar to what people went through on ships crossing the Atlantic in the 17th century or earlier. Perhaps more like the Vikings. Perhaps we can put them all in a sub, and force them to go around the World or something several times. There is an element missing in the experiment. Essentially being on your own, with no hope of rescue or assistance in a place where even little things can be fatal. Even when everything is going well, there must always be that concern way in the back of the mind to get a real feel for the long-term impact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is likly most similar to what people went through on ships crossing the Atlantic in the 17th century or earlier .
Perhaps more like the Vikings .
Perhaps we can put them all in a sub , and force them to go around the World or something several times .
There is an element missing in the experiment .
Essentially being on your own , with no hope of rescue or assistance in a place where even little things can be fatal .
Even when everything is going well , there must always be that concern way in the back of the mind to get a real feel for the long-term impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is likly most similar to what people went through on ships crossing the Atlantic in the 17th century or earlier.
Perhaps more like the Vikings.
Perhaps we can put them all in a sub, and force them to go around the World or something several times.
There is an element missing in the experiment.
Essentially being on your own, with no hope of rescue or assistance in a place where even little things can be fatal.
Even when everything is going well, there must always be that concern way in the back of the mind to get a real feel for the long-term impact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711349</id>
	<title>Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they're planning on building a space 7 Eleven there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 're planning on building a space 7 Eleven there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they're planning on building a space 7 Eleven there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707183</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>nospam007</author>
	<datestamp>1247690220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Every geek knows that too, but they stay anyway much longer than 105 days in their mother's basement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , those 105 people * knew * that just outside the cramped wall was a big , beautiful , receptive planet , with air to breathe , beer to drink , and babes walking around to scope out Every geek knows that too , but they stay anyway much longer than 105 days in their mother 's basement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out Every geek knows that too, but they stay anyway much longer than 105 days in their mother's basement.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706901</id>
	<title>Holy shit!</title>
	<author>shaze</author>
	<datestamp>1247688780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dudes,

They should totally send David Blaine up in that shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dudes , They should totally send David Blaine up in that shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dudes,

They should totally send David Blaine up in that shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706337</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247686260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if there was a sick psychopath who kills all but one other crewmember who he incapacitates. Then he slowly violates/tortures that crewmate while posting continuous updates to a horrified and helpless control center who is forced to watch the events unfold. Sounds like a movie plot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if there was a sick psychopath who kills all but one other crewmember who he incapacitates .
Then he slowly violates/tortures that crewmate while posting continuous updates to a horrified and helpless control center who is forced to watch the events unfold .
Sounds like a movie plot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if there was a sick psychopath who kills all but one other crewmember who he incapacitates.
Then he slowly violates/tortures that crewmate while posting continuous updates to a horrified and helpless control center who is forced to watch the events unfold.
Sounds like a movie plot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707197</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247690280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.</p><p>See, *I've* always thought of space as the most unfathomably complete void mankind can comprehend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest , blackest , most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.See , * I 've * always thought of space as the most unfathomably complete void mankind can comprehend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.See, *I've* always thought of space as the most unfathomably complete void mankind can comprehend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709589</id>
	<title>Re:Physchology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247658180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spoken like a true geek!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out. </p></div><p>OR, Those astronauts did the 105 days knowing they only had a shower etc. to look forward to- not one of the most life changing, history making experiences of their lives. These are people that live for adventure- not "beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out".</p><p>IMO 105 days in a boring danger free bubble with nothing at the end of it would seem to last a lot longer than living at the edge of safety and MARS!! to scope out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoken like a true geek ! See , those 105 people * knew * that just outside the cramped wall was a big , beautiful , receptive planet , with air to breathe , beer to drink , and babes walking around to scope out .
OR , Those astronauts did the 105 days knowing they only had a shower etc .
to look forward to- not one of the most life changing , history making experiences of their lives .
These are people that live for adventure- not " beer to drink , and babes walking around to scope out " .IMO 105 days in a boring danger free bubble with nothing at the end of it would seem to last a lot longer than living at the edge of safety and MARS ! !
to scope out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoken like a true geek!See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.
OR, Those astronauts did the 105 days knowing they only had a shower etc.
to look forward to- not one of the most life changing, history making experiences of their lives.
These are people that live for adventure- not "beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out".IMO 105 days in a boring danger free bubble with nothing at the end of it would seem to last a lot longer than living at the edge of safety and MARS!!
to scope out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705351</id>
	<title>The hardest part...</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1247682000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They had no television</p></div><p>Easy. I hardly watch TV any more, with all the bullshit that's usually on...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>or Internet and</p></div><p>That's already lots harder... but I might muster enough willpower...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>  their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers</p></div><p>...</p><p><div class="quote"><p> &#226;" who also monitored them via TV cameras &#226;"</p> </div><p>O gosh! That's cruel. No privacy for a quick handjob...  105 days without wanking, o the inhumanity!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They had no televisionEasy .
I hardly watch TV any more , with all the bullshit that 's usually on...or Internet andThat 's already lots harder... but I might muster enough willpower... their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment 's controllers...   " who also monitored them via TV cameras   " O gosh !
That 's cruel .
No privacy for a quick handjob... 105 days without wanking , o the inhumanity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had no televisionEasy.
I hardly watch TV any more, with all the bullshit that's usually on...or Internet andThat's already lots harder... but I might muster enough willpower...  their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers... â" who also monitored them via TV cameras â" O gosh!
That's cruel.
No privacy for a quick handjob...  105 days without wanking, o the inhumanity!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713865
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28715195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711351
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28716345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_169205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28704971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705189
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706801
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706133
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705299
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707875
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707291
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711727
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28716345
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706299
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708049
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705921
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705757
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712049
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705447
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711843
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710125
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28710635
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708589
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707431
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711821
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707549
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705265
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707771
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706373
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706423
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707971
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28715195
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706905
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706363
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707049
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28713523
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706789
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707183
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707027
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711945
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706405
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708005
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28712031
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706843
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705855
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706849
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28709871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707441
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705239
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705851
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706935
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707033
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705297
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705441
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28708027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28707949
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28706015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28705835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_169205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_169205.28711337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
