<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_15_1635245</id>
	<title>Bill Gates Puts Classic Feynman Lectures Online</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247678160000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:theodp@aol.com" rel="nofollow">theodp</a> writes <i>"Okay Tux fans, let's see how badly you want to see Feynman's Messenger Lectures on Physics. Bill Gates <a href="http://research.microsoft.com/apps/tools/tuva/index.html">has the goods over at Microsoft Research's Project Tuva site</a>. Also, CNET's Ina Fried has an <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860\_3-10286732-56.html">interesting interview with Gates</a>. He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web, talks about the possibility of <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860\_3-10286309-56.html">Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to Windows</a>, gives his <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860\_3-10286308-56.html">thoughts on Google's Chrome OS</a>, and discusses plans to patent 'cows that don't fart.' The last is a joke. I think."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Okay Tux fans , let 's see how badly you want to see Feynman 's Messenger Lectures on Physics .
Bill Gates has the goods over at Microsoft Research 's Project Tuva site .
Also , CNET 's Ina Fried has an interesting interview with Gates .
He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web , talks about the possibility of Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to Windows , gives his thoughts on Google 's Chrome OS , and discusses plans to patent 'cows that do n't fart .
' The last is a joke .
I think .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Okay Tux fans, let's see how badly you want to see Feynman's Messenger Lectures on Physics.
Bill Gates has the goods over at Microsoft Research's Project Tuva site.
Also, CNET's Ina Fried has an interesting interview with Gates.
He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web, talks about the possibility of Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to Windows, gives his thoughts on Google's Chrome OS, and discusses plans to patent 'cows that don't fart.
' The last is a joke.
I think.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709687</id>
	<title>Re:Why did Bill Gates have to pay to buy the right</title>
	<author>Kimen</author>
	<datestamp>1247658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have software on my computer already that will play WMV, H.264, and a host of other standard formats.  So many people confuse a standard file delivery format with software.  I do NOT want Silverlight on my computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have software on my computer already that will play WMV , H.264 , and a host of other standard formats .
So many people confuse a standard file delivery format with software .
I do NOT want Silverlight on my computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have software on my computer already that will play WMV, H.264, and a host of other standard formats.
So many people confuse a standard file delivery format with software.
I do NOT want Silverlight on my computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711253</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>sakusha</author>
	<datestamp>1247668380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Check out the player experience, and its navigation, commentary, captioning, etcetera. And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.</p></div></blockquote><p>As he said, those features are all available on the video players already available. QuickTime and QuickTime Streaming Server (and it's Open Source version Darwin Streaming Server) already offer all those features.</p><p>So why do I need Silverlight, except to support Bill Gates' attempt to "knife the baby"...?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the player experience , and its navigation , commentary , captioning , etcetera .
And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.As he said , those features are all available on the video players already available .
QuickTime and QuickTime Streaming Server ( and it 's Open Source version Darwin Streaming Server ) already offer all those features.So why do I need Silverlight , except to support Bill Gates ' attempt to " knife the baby " ... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the player experience, and its navigation, commentary, captioning, etcetera.
And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.As he said, those features are all available on the video players already available.
QuickTime and QuickTime Streaming Server (and it's Open Source version Darwin Streaming Server) already offer all those features.So why do I need Silverlight, except to support Bill Gates' attempt to "knife the baby"...?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706635</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247687640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because there is Goddamned video, you fucking faggot.  Don't want to download Silverlight?  Then don't.  Instead, stop acting like a bitch and go fuck yourself.  It's a win for everyone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because there is Goddamned video , you fucking faggot .
Do n't want to download Silverlight ?
Then do n't .
Instead , stop acting like a bitch and go fuck yourself .
It 's a win for everyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because there is Goddamned video, you fucking faggot.
Don't want to download Silverlight?
Then don't.
Instead, stop acting like a bitch and go fuck yourself.
It's a win for everyone!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705295</id>
	<title>This is so exciting!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is fantastic--Bill Gates has finally come around to supporting Linux, even in a non-technical way. This is so important to the history of our operating system. Time to boot up 2.6.36, load iTunes via WINE, and listen away!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is fantastic--Bill Gates has finally come around to supporting Linux , even in a non-technical way .
This is so important to the history of our operating system .
Time to boot up 2.6.36 , load iTunes via WINE , and listen away !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is fantastic--Bill Gates has finally come around to supporting Linux, even in a non-technical way.
This is so important to the history of our operating system.
Time to boot up 2.6.36, load iTunes via WINE, and listen away!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706099</id>
	<title>Education begins where vocational focus ends.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1247685060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that it's great that Gates made Feynman's lectures available for free online. Now, I don't know a lot about physics, but I do know that his lectures were some of the best sources out there to learn it. In addition, there are several outlets available for people to expand their knowledge base, with MIT OpenCourseWare being one of the more popular ones. Heck, people could even use YouTube to gain a better understanding of any one topic. It could even be argued that a source like YouTube is better, since the educational videos I've seen were explained in very simple terms (which are always the best terms).
<br> <br>
That all goes to show that the sources are there, and are very easy to access. You don't even need an account to access <b>nearly the same material as MIT students do!</b> However, Gates was absolutely right in that motivation is a really strong factor in wanting to find that stuff. I think that a source of that waning motivation comes from the desire to find a job, especially "in this economy."
<br> <br>
So many people see school solely as a "means to an end," and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this. When one's goal is simply to graduate, there's "no time" to bother with learning the extra stuff; it's all about the grade in that paradigm.
<br> <br>
I don't want to make this longer than it already is, but what I think would be awesome is to let students "create a major" at the college level. Some schools, like RPI and RIT, already practice this, but it should be practiced much more heavily, especially in the sciences and engineering. As a finishing Computer Engineering student, I'll be the first to say that it kind of sucks that I have to take a ton of classes that will have no practical OR educational use for me, just so that I can graduate under the guidelines of a program. However, that rant is for another time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that it 's great that Gates made Feynman 's lectures available for free online .
Now , I do n't know a lot about physics , but I do know that his lectures were some of the best sources out there to learn it .
In addition , there are several outlets available for people to expand their knowledge base , with MIT OpenCourseWare being one of the more popular ones .
Heck , people could even use YouTube to gain a better understanding of any one topic .
It could even be argued that a source like YouTube is better , since the educational videos I 've seen were explained in very simple terms ( which are always the best terms ) .
That all goes to show that the sources are there , and are very easy to access .
You do n't even need an account to access nearly the same material as MIT students do !
However , Gates was absolutely right in that motivation is a really strong factor in wanting to find that stuff .
I think that a source of that waning motivation comes from the desire to find a job , especially " in this economy .
" So many people see school solely as a " means to an end , " and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this .
When one 's goal is simply to graduate , there 's " no time " to bother with learning the extra stuff ; it 's all about the grade in that paradigm .
I do n't want to make this longer than it already is , but what I think would be awesome is to let students " create a major " at the college level .
Some schools , like RPI and RIT , already practice this , but it should be practiced much more heavily , especially in the sciences and engineering .
As a finishing Computer Engineering student , I 'll be the first to say that it kind of sucks that I have to take a ton of classes that will have no practical OR educational use for me , just so that I can graduate under the guidelines of a program .
However , that rant is for another time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that it's great that Gates made Feynman's lectures available for free online.
Now, I don't know a lot about physics, but I do know that his lectures were some of the best sources out there to learn it.
In addition, there are several outlets available for people to expand their knowledge base, with MIT OpenCourseWare being one of the more popular ones.
Heck, people could even use YouTube to gain a better understanding of any one topic.
It could even be argued that a source like YouTube is better, since the educational videos I've seen were explained in very simple terms (which are always the best terms).
That all goes to show that the sources are there, and are very easy to access.
You don't even need an account to access nearly the same material as MIT students do!
However, Gates was absolutely right in that motivation is a really strong factor in wanting to find that stuff.
I think that a source of that waning motivation comes from the desire to find a job, especially "in this economy.
"
 
So many people see school solely as a "means to an end," and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this.
When one's goal is simply to graduate, there's "no time" to bother with learning the extra stuff; it's all about the grade in that paradigm.
I don't want to make this longer than it already is, but what I think would be awesome is to let students "create a major" at the college level.
Some schools, like RPI and RIT, already practice this, but it should be practiced much more heavily, especially in the sciences and engineering.
As a finishing Computer Engineering student, I'll be the first to say that it kind of sucks that I have to take a ton of classes that will have no practical OR educational use for me, just so that I can graduate under the guidelines of a program.
However, that rant is for another time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705907</id>
	<title>Browser results ...</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1247684160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, requires you to have Silverlight installed. I'm using Windows, so I don't have a chance to try it with Moonlight. Somewhat disappointing that Moonlight isn't aimed at Windows. Could probably pick up some more users for those of us, who aren't fans of IE or Firefox</p><p>IE 8 - works (duh)<br>Firefox 3 - works (surprise)<br>Opera 9/10 - doesn't work<br>Chrome 2 - doesn't work<br>Safari 4 - doesn't work</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , requires you to have Silverlight installed .
I 'm using Windows , so I do n't have a chance to try it with Moonlight .
Somewhat disappointing that Moonlight is n't aimed at Windows .
Could probably pick up some more users for those of us , who are n't fans of IE or FirefoxIE 8 - works ( duh ) Firefox 3 - works ( surprise ) Opera 9/10 - does n't workChrome 2 - does n't workSafari 4 - does n't work</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, requires you to have Silverlight installed.
I'm using Windows, so I don't have a chance to try it with Moonlight.
Somewhat disappointing that Moonlight isn't aimed at Windows.
Could probably pick up some more users for those of us, who aren't fans of IE or FirefoxIE 8 - works (duh)Firefox 3 - works (surprise)Opera 9/10 - doesn't workChrome 2 - doesn't workSafari 4 - doesn't work</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707801</id>
	<title>gestures?</title>
	<author>TheJodster</author>
	<datestamp>1247649840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> talks about the possibility of Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to Windows</p></div><p>I know what my first gesture for my windows installation will be...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>talks about the possibility of Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to WindowsI know what my first gesture for my windows installation will be.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> talks about the possibility of Project Natal bringing gesture recognition to WindowsI know what my first gesture for my windows installation will be...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557</id>
	<title>This ranting is getting out of hand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it rather disconcerting that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. has become some form of opinion ranting site, rather than a news aggregation site. I'm no fan of any company, be they Windows, Google, Apple, etc., but this whole MS bashing thing is getting ridiculous. I find it pretty funny that on the same day Apple patches their iTunes store to lock out Palm Pre's, not a whisper about it on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., and yet just because MS decides to use their Silverlight to show some videos suddenly "MS are retard, facepalm, evil har har har" comments go up all over the place. I know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is geared towards amateur programmers/technologists, but there comes a point when you mods have to be more strict about all the ranting that goes on. The actual news and valid opinions seem to get lost in the sea of "\_EnterCompanyName\_ is teh evil i haet them!" posts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it rather disconcerting that / .
has become some form of opinion ranting site , rather than a news aggregation site .
I 'm no fan of any company , be they Windows , Google , Apple , etc. , but this whole MS bashing thing is getting ridiculous .
I find it pretty funny that on the same day Apple patches their iTunes store to lock out Palm Pre 's , not a whisper about it on /. , and yet just because MS decides to use their Silverlight to show some videos suddenly " MS are retard , facepalm , evil har har har " comments go up all over the place .
I know / .
is geared towards amateur programmers/technologists , but there comes a point when you mods have to be more strict about all the ranting that goes on .
The actual news and valid opinions seem to get lost in the sea of " \ _EnterCompanyName \ _ is teh evil i haet them !
" posts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it rather disconcerting that /.
has become some form of opinion ranting site, rather than a news aggregation site.
I'm no fan of any company, be they Windows, Google, Apple, etc., but this whole MS bashing thing is getting ridiculous.
I find it pretty funny that on the same day Apple patches their iTunes store to lock out Palm Pre's, not a whisper about it on /., and yet just because MS decides to use their Silverlight to show some videos suddenly "MS are retard, facepalm, evil har har har" comments go up all over the place.
I know /.
is geared towards amateur programmers/technologists, but there comes a point when you mods have to be more strict about all the ranting that goes on.
The actual news and valid opinions seem to get lost in the sea of "\_EnterCompanyName\_ is teh evil i haet them!
" posts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705893</id>
	<title>Re:Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1247684100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get rich while being an idiot, but <i>that</i> rich? He had to have some brains somewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get rich while being an idiot , but that rich ?
He had to have some brains somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get rich while being an idiot, but that rich?
He had to have some brains somewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706929</id>
	<title>Re:The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1247688900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>AFAIK, Chrome and Android are running on vastly different kernels.  I've always been under the impression that Win Mobile was a stripped down version of Windows (albeit with modifications), but the core kernel was the same.  I would imagine Gates is thinking back to WinNT, Win9x days when things were royally hosed.  But hey, what do I know, maybe I'm giving the guy too much credit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK , Chrome and Android are running on vastly different kernels .
I 've always been under the impression that Win Mobile was a stripped down version of Windows ( albeit with modifications ) , but the core kernel was the same .
I would imagine Gates is thinking back to WinNT , Win9x days when things were royally hosed .
But hey , what do I know , maybe I 'm giving the guy too much credit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK, Chrome and Android are running on vastly different kernels.
I've always been under the impression that Win Mobile was a stripped down version of Windows (albeit with modifications), but the core kernel was the same.
I would imagine Gates is thinking back to WinNT, Win9x days when things were royally hosed.
But hey, what do I know, maybe I'm giving the guy too much credit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706673</id>
	<title>Patenting fart free cows</title>
	<author>shuz</author>
	<datestamp>1247687760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chances are this was a joke, however if it wasn't there has been many studies related to the topic. One interesting note is that "cow farts" or bovine flatulence constitutes only 1/6th of greenhouse gasses and that cow burping constitutes 5/6th. So while I can applaud Mr. Gates for patenting bovine Beano(TM), it would be wiser for him to focus on the gas causing sugars in the feed or the bacteria that create the gasses inside the stomach. Some info <a href="http://http//www.fart-sounds.net/educated\_fart\_analysis.htm/" title="http">http://http//www.fart-sounds.net/educated\_fart\_analysis.htm/</a> [http]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chances are this was a joke , however if it was n't there has been many studies related to the topic .
One interesting note is that " cow farts " or bovine flatulence constitutes only 1/6th of greenhouse gasses and that cow burping constitutes 5/6th .
So while I can applaud Mr. Gates for patenting bovine Beano ( TM ) , it would be wiser for him to focus on the gas causing sugars in the feed or the bacteria that create the gasses inside the stomach .
Some info http : //http//www.fart-sounds.net/educated \ _fart \ _analysis.htm/ [ http ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chances are this was a joke, however if it wasn't there has been many studies related to the topic.
One interesting note is that "cow farts" or bovine flatulence constitutes only 1/6th of greenhouse gasses and that cow burping constitutes 5/6th.
So while I can applaud Mr. Gates for patenting bovine Beano(TM), it would be wiser for him to focus on the gas causing sugars in the feed or the bacteria that create the gasses inside the stomach.
Some info http://http//www.fart-sounds.net/educated\_fart\_analysis.htm/ [http]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714349</id>
	<title>Transexual???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247742480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Ina Fried has an interesting interview with Gates</p></div><p>Don't you find it gross that a guy became a girl??</p><p>ewww</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ina Fried has an interesting interview with GatesDo n't you find it gross that a guy became a girl ?
? ewww</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Ina Fried has an interesting interview with GatesDon't you find it gross that a guy became a girl?
?ewww
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965</id>
	<title>Lecture in MKV, MPEG4?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures, so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application' to make people want to install the plug-in.</p><p>On a more optimistic note, does anyone have these lectures in MKV or MPEG4 format, or at least something using a more open format?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures , so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application ' to make people want to install the plug-in.On a more optimistic note , does anyone have these lectures in MKV or MPEG4 format , or at least something using a more open format ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures, so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application' to make people want to install the plug-in.On a more optimistic note, does anyone have these lectures in MKV or MPEG4 format, or at least something using a more open format?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712277</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah fag, because that ability is totally unique to this bull shit garbage. Eat a turd you stupid twat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah fag , because that ability is totally unique to this bull shit garbage .
Eat a turd you stupid twat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah fag, because that ability is totally unique to this bull shit garbage.
Eat a turd you stupid twat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28745103</id>
	<title>A technical discussion of Project Tuva</title>
	<author>endquotedotcom</author>
	<datestamp>1247932200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm the principal developer on Project Tuva, and I've posted a bit on my blog about the technical details of the project, in case anyone's interested: <a href="http://blog.endquote.com/post/144450114/project-tuva-post-mortem" title="endquote.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.endquote.com/post/144450114/project-tuva-post-mortem</a> [endquote.com] <p>Regarding all of the Silverlight criticism -- yes, the videos could have just been posted in ogg vorbis or something to make everyone happy, but the Silverlight app adds many additional features in support of learning. Think of it as the bonus content on the DVD release. It's actually pretty cool. Silverlight isn't evil, and as someone who's very familiar with both Flash and Silverlight, I can tell you that badly-behaved Flash apps are more likely to make your system unstable than Silverlight apps will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm the principal developer on Project Tuva , and I 've posted a bit on my blog about the technical details of the project , in case anyone 's interested : http : //blog.endquote.com/post/144450114/project-tuva-post-mortem [ endquote.com ] Regarding all of the Silverlight criticism -- yes , the videos could have just been posted in ogg vorbis or something to make everyone happy , but the Silverlight app adds many additional features in support of learning .
Think of it as the bonus content on the DVD release .
It 's actually pretty cool .
Silverlight is n't evil , and as someone who 's very familiar with both Flash and Silverlight , I can tell you that badly-behaved Flash apps are more likely to make your system unstable than Silverlight apps will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm the principal developer on Project Tuva, and I've posted a bit on my blog about the technical details of the project, in case anyone's interested: http://blog.endquote.com/post/144450114/project-tuva-post-mortem [endquote.com] Regarding all of the Silverlight criticism -- yes, the videos could have just been posted in ogg vorbis or something to make everyone happy, but the Silverlight app adds many additional features in support of learning.
Think of it as the bonus content on the DVD release.
It's actually pretty cool.
Silverlight isn't evil, and as someone who's very familiar with both Flash and Silverlight, I can tell you that badly-behaved Flash apps are more likely to make your system unstable than Silverlight apps will.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333</id>
	<title>I know why.</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1247681940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web</i></p><p>That's easy.  It's a good way to lure technically minded people into installing Silverlight. No sale here Gates, I'll wait until it's available by torrent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the WebThat 's easy .
It 's a good way to lure technically minded people into installing Silverlight .
No sale here Gates , I 'll wait until it 's available by torrent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the WebThat's easy.
It's a good way to lure technically minded people into installing Silverlight.
No sale here Gates, I'll wait until it's available by torrent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</id>
	<title>Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</b>

<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/view\_play\_list?p=AF0DF573FA4E9B58&amp;search\_query=Feynman+part+lecture" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">List all lectures</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/view\_play\_list?p=4CA01D30269D3A26&amp;search\_query=Feynman+Lectures++Relation++physics" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Richard Feynman - The Relation of Mathematics &amp; Physics</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/view\_play\_list?p=DF1C1F0E669EE2D3&amp;search\_query=Feynman+Lectures+laws+gravitation" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/view\_play\_list?p=1E28798A3787BC36&amp;search\_query=Feynman+part" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Feynman: Quantum Electrodynamics.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube links for non-sliverlighters List all lectures [ youtube.com ] Richard Feynman - The Relation of Mathematics &amp; Physics [ youtube.com ] Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation [ youtube.com ] Feynman : Quantum Electrodynamics .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube links for non-sliverlighters


List all lectures [youtube.com]

Richard Feynman - The Relation of Mathematics &amp; Physics [youtube.com]

Richard Feynman - The Law of Gravitation [youtube.com]

Feynman: Quantum Electrodynamics.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight? </i></p><p>It's yet another attack vector.  I already have a video player on my system, and Silverlight offers me nothing that I can't do without it.  It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight ?
It 's yet another attack vector .
I already have a video player on my system , and Silverlight offers me nothing that I ca n't do without it .
It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?
It's yet another attack vector.
I already have a video player on my system, and Silverlight offers me nothing that I can't do without it.
It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707745</id>
	<title>Re:The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>Slothrup</author>
	<datestamp>1247649660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS, DUMBSHIT!  Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?</p></div><p>While that was probably the right decision at the time it was made (Windows CE is over ten years old, after all), I think that most people here at MS would do it differently if creating a new mobile OS today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>regarding Bill 's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS 's ( Chrome and Android ) ... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS , DUMBSHIT !
Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista ? While that was probably the right decision at the time it was made ( Windows CE is over ten years old , after all ) , I think that most people here at MS would do it differently if creating a new mobile OS today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS, DUMBSHIT!
Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?While that was probably the right decision at the time it was made (Windows CE is over ten years old, after all), I think that most people here at MS would do it differently if creating a new mobile OS today.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709339</id>
	<title>Re:The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1247657040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a good parallel. Google is new to the OS business, and their core lies far from operating systems or even desktop applications (altyhough they have a reasonable amount of experience there). Microsoft has been making multiple operating systems longer than Google has even existed. They also waited quite a while after creating their first OS line before starting another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a good parallel .
Google is new to the OS business , and their core lies far from operating systems or even desktop applications ( altyhough they have a reasonable amount of experience there ) .
Microsoft has been making multiple operating systems longer than Google has even existed .
They also waited quite a while after creating their first OS line before starting another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a good parallel.
Google is new to the OS business, and their core lies far from operating systems or even desktop applications (altyhough they have a reasonable amount of experience there).
Microsoft has been making multiple operating systems longer than Google has even existed.
They also waited quite a while after creating their first OS line before starting another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707689</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Dolohov</author>
	<datestamp>1247649360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at it this way: assume for a moment that he wants to be altruistic. The technologies available to him to do this the way he wants are Silverlight and Flash.  He's a Microsoft fan, he naturally chooses Silverlight - or more likely, the Microsoft lackey he gives the job to chooses it out of fear of being berated for choosing something "inferior".</p><p>So, looking from the outside, the altruistic explanation looks exactly the same as the conniving one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at it this way : assume for a moment that he wants to be altruistic .
The technologies available to him to do this the way he wants are Silverlight and Flash .
He 's a Microsoft fan , he naturally chooses Silverlight - or more likely , the Microsoft lackey he gives the job to chooses it out of fear of being berated for choosing something " inferior " .So , looking from the outside , the altruistic explanation looks exactly the same as the conniving one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at it this way: assume for a moment that he wants to be altruistic.
The technologies available to him to do this the way he wants are Silverlight and Flash.
He's a Microsoft fan, he naturally chooses Silverlight - or more likely, the Microsoft lackey he gives the job to chooses it out of fear of being berated for choosing something "inferior".So, looking from the outside, the altruistic explanation looks exactly the same as the conniving one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705745</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247683500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if I should grab the videos, repack it in a mp4 file and publish it to pirate bay as in torrent?</p><p>The only issue would be installing Silverlight and being another number in MS statistics. I don`t have tripwire on this partition too and I have no time to review<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.pkg.</p><p>I bet someone else who got experience in these things is already on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if I should grab the videos , repack it in a mp4 file and publish it to pirate bay as in torrent ? The only issue would be installing Silverlight and being another number in MS statistics .
I don ` t have tripwire on this partition too and I have no time to review .pkg.I bet someone else who got experience in these things is already on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if I should grab the videos, repack it in a mp4 file and publish it to pirate bay as in torrent?The only issue would be installing Silverlight and being another number in MS statistics.
I don`t have tripwire on this partition too and I have no time to review .pkg.I bet someone else who got experience in these things is already on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706609</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>Vectronic</author>
	<datestamp>1247687580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll believe it, cause its the same for a lot of VM's, because hitting Ctrl+Alt+Del in the VM, is often sent to the host PC instead. SO you can either change the keystroke to Shift+Alt+Del or something, or... use the button.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll believe it , cause its the same for a lot of VM 's , because hitting Ctrl + Alt + Del in the VM , is often sent to the host PC instead .
SO you can either change the keystroke to Shift + Alt + Del or something , or... use the button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll believe it, cause its the same for a lot of VM's, because hitting Ctrl+Alt+Del in the VM, is often sent to the host PC instead.
SO you can either change the keystroke to Shift+Alt+Del or something, or... use the button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708603</id>
	<title>The player</title>
	<author>mozzis</author>
	<datestamp>1247653860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...is a really nice way to watch these. Subtitles, links to related materials, a timeline, links to places in the timeline - silverlight really shines in this presentation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is a really nice way to watch these .
Subtitles , links to related materials , a timeline , links to places in the timeline - silverlight really shines in this presentation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is a really nice way to watch these.
Subtitles, links to related materials, a timeline, links to places in the timeline - silverlight really shines in this presentation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708347</id>
	<title>I'll simply say</title>
	<author>Vadim Makarov</author>
	<datestamp>1247652660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Gates, thank you!</p><p>I will watch them all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates , thank you ! I will watch them all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates, thank you!I will watch them all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706867</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if Google decided to release the lectures don't you think they would do it on youtube or google video? Is that such a stretch. Bill Gates is affiliated with Microsoft and as such will continue to prop up and support microsoft technologies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if Google decided to release the lectures do n't you think they would do it on youtube or google video ?
Is that such a stretch .
Bill Gates is affiliated with Microsoft and as such will continue to prop up and support microsoft technologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if Google decided to release the lectures don't you think they would do it on youtube or google video?
Is that such a stretch.
Bill Gates is affiliated with Microsoft and as such will continue to prop up and support microsoft technologies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707647</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>COMON$</author>
	<datestamp>1247649180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ummm because ever since NT Ctrl+Alt+Delete brings up a task menu which "believe it or not" is damn useful when working with a windows box...<p>
Yes I have no sense of humor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ummm because ever since NT Ctrl + Alt + Delete brings up a task menu which " believe it or not " is damn useful when working with a windows box.. . Yes I have no sense of humor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ummm because ever since NT Ctrl+Alt+Delete brings up a task menu which "believe it or not" is damn useful when working with a windows box...
Yes I have no sense of humor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707823</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture in MKV, MPEG4?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you bother to actually view the lectures on the site, there is significantly more than just video. You get subtitles, optional commentary, bookmarks, notes, and timestamped detail diagrams and sidebars.</p><p>Love or hate silverlight, it is being used for significnatly more than just movie playback here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you bother to actually view the lectures on the site , there is significantly more than just video .
You get subtitles , optional commentary , bookmarks , notes , and timestamped detail diagrams and sidebars.Love or hate silverlight , it is being used for significnatly more than just movie playback here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you bother to actually view the lectures on the site, there is significantly more than just video.
You get subtitles, optional commentary, bookmarks, notes, and timestamped detail diagrams and sidebars.Love or hate silverlight, it is being used for significnatly more than just movie playback here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706633</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247687640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knee-jerk? You're applying that descriptive phrase in a very simplistic, baiting way. The issues over Moonlight/Silverlight have been discussed not just on Slashdot multiple times but all over the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knee-jerk ?
You 're applying that descriptive phrase in a very simplistic , baiting way .
The issues over Moonlight/Silverlight have been discussed not just on Slashdot multiple times but all over the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knee-jerk?
You're applying that descriptive phrase in a very simplistic, baiting way.
The issues over Moonlight/Silverlight have been discussed not just on Slashdot multiple times but all over the Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705833</id>
	<title>Re:Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>teknopurge</author>
	<datestamp>1247683860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's every other major OS release that sucks from Microsoft.  It's not an accident either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's every other major OS release that sucks from Microsoft .
It 's not an accident either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's every other major OS release that sucks from Microsoft.
It's not an accident either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708555</id>
	<title>Gah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right, I know this isn't a tech support forum, but..........

I'm on Ubuntu, I have Moonlight installed, I have my User Agent set to IE7, how do I get the f***cking site to recognise I can play the videos. It seems other on here have got it to work. How?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , I know this is n't a tech support forum , but......... . I 'm on Ubuntu , I have Moonlight installed , I have my User Agent set to IE7 , how do I get the f * * * cking site to recognise I can play the videos .
It seems other on here have got it to work .
How ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, I know this isn't a tech support forum, but..........

I'm on Ubuntu, I have Moonlight installed, I have my User Agent set to IE7, how do I get the f***cking site to recognise I can play the videos.
It seems other on here have got it to work.
How?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>People are saying it offers nothing that youtube or other types of services offer, and yet I just watched the first lecture at the silverlight site, and thought it was pretty cool how there was 2 text commentaries from physicists you could have as an optional caption, and links to deeper information about certain people and topics he was discussing, that would appear as he was talking about them.
<br>
<br>
It's the first video I've watched with silverlight, and I didn't mind it at all.   The extras it offered allowed me to get a better grasp on certain topics he was covering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People are saying it offers nothing that youtube or other types of services offer , and yet I just watched the first lecture at the silverlight site , and thought it was pretty cool how there was 2 text commentaries from physicists you could have as an optional caption , and links to deeper information about certain people and topics he was discussing , that would appear as he was talking about them .
It 's the first video I 've watched with silverlight , and I did n't mind it at all .
The extras it offered allowed me to get a better grasp on certain topics he was covering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are saying it offers nothing that youtube or other types of services offer, and yet I just watched the first lecture at the silverlight site, and thought it was pretty cool how there was 2 text commentaries from physicists you could have as an optional caption, and links to deeper information about certain people and topics he was discussing, that would appear as he was talking about them.
It's the first video I've watched with silverlight, and I didn't mind it at all.
The extras it offered allowed me to get a better grasp on certain topics he was covering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707459</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1247691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next stop, convincing Adobe to stop releasing all their documents in that damn pdf format!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next stop , convincing Adobe to stop releasing all their documents in that damn pdf format !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next stop, convincing Adobe to stop releasing all their documents in that damn pdf format!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714001</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1247738040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He's donating more than he's required to, and doing it of his own free will.  May as well be pleased about that.</p></div><p>My (poor) understanding of US inheritance laws makes it a necessity to give away his fortune to charities and charitable foundations if he doesn't want the government to get hold of 45\% of it.</p><p>So the altruism would be jumping out of the way of the oncoming truck.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's donating more than he 's required to , and doing it of his own free will .
May as well be pleased about that.My ( poor ) understanding of US inheritance laws makes it a necessity to give away his fortune to charities and charitable foundations if he does n't want the government to get hold of 45 \ % of it.So the altruism would be jumping out of the way of the oncoming truck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's donating more than he's required to, and doing it of his own free will.
May as well be pleased about that.My (poor) understanding of US inheritance laws makes it a necessity to give away his fortune to charities and charitable foundations if he doesn't want the government to get hold of 45\% of it.So the altruism would be jumping out of the way of the oncoming truck.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247683320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess the most easily reached UI element of XP Mode under Windows 7 which is basically hand crafted Virtual PC?</p><p>a button saying "ctrl-alt-delete" is right at its toolbar. Believe or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess the most easily reached UI element of XP Mode under Windows 7 which is basically hand crafted Virtual PC ? a button saying " ctrl-alt-delete " is right at its toolbar .
Believe or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess the most easily reached UI element of XP Mode under Windows 7 which is basically hand crafted Virtual PC?a button saying "ctrl-alt-delete" is right at its toolbar.
Believe or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710559</id>
	<title>Silverlight Trojan Horse</title>
	<author>curmudgeon99</author>
	<datestamp>1247663340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill! Nice try, man. Like we didn't see that coming. In order to see the great man's lectures I have to install--WTF? Silverlight? What's that? Some<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET crap that's going to clog up my machine with a bunch of vampire processes? Not on your life. Bill--take it from moi--if you want to do a good deed, drop those vids of Feynman on Google Video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill !
Nice try , man .
Like we did n't see that coming .
In order to see the great man 's lectures I have to install--WTF ?
Silverlight ? What 's that ?
Some .NET crap that 's going to clog up my machine with a bunch of vampire processes ?
Not on your life .
Bill--take it from moi--if you want to do a good deed , drop those vids of Feynman on Google Video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill!
Nice try, man.
Like we didn't see that coming.
In order to see the great man's lectures I have to install--WTF?
Silverlight? What's that?
Some .NET crap that's going to clog up my machine with a bunch of vampire processes?
Not on your life.
Bill--take it from moi--if you want to do a good deed, drop those vids of Feynman on Google Video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28802391</id>
	<title>No, It's Called Experience</title>
	<author>curmudgeon99</author>
	<datestamp>1248356460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember RealAudio? In the late 90's they owned internet audio? But then when you installed their player it took total control of your machine and basically was just a bad application? Well, they're gone now, basically. Microsoft is a similar case. They screwed with people so much that a bunch of competitors appeared. I used to code on MS platforms but I stopped and switched to Java a long time ago.

The reason people beat up on Microsoft is because Microsoft--the company--is a bastard. So, in this age, don't ever be evil or you will be remembered forever for it. That's what's happening here. You're blaming the messengers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember RealAudio ?
In the late 90 's they owned internet audio ?
But then when you installed their player it took total control of your machine and basically was just a bad application ?
Well , they 're gone now , basically .
Microsoft is a similar case .
They screwed with people so much that a bunch of competitors appeared .
I used to code on MS platforms but I stopped and switched to Java a long time ago .
The reason people beat up on Microsoft is because Microsoft--the company--is a bastard .
So , in this age , do n't ever be evil or you will be remembered forever for it .
That 's what 's happening here .
You 're blaming the messengers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember RealAudio?
In the late 90's they owned internet audio?
But then when you installed their player it took total control of your machine and basically was just a bad application?
Well, they're gone now, basically.
Microsoft is a similar case.
They screwed with people so much that a bunch of competitors appeared.
I used to code on MS platforms but I stopped and switched to Java a long time ago.
The reason people beat up on Microsoft is because Microsoft--the company--is a bastard.
So, in this age, don't ever be evil or you will be remembered forever for it.
That's what's happening here.
You're blaming the messengers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710447</id>
	<title>of no interest to today's student</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247662620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got my phD 20 years ago, and find these interesting. I'm a big fan of feynman.</p><p>but if you're learning the subject today and watching these, stop now and get a textbook and a good teacher. they really aren't very good lectures.  in fact, they are a terrible waste of your time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got my phD 20 years ago , and find these interesting .
I 'm a big fan of feynman.but if you 're learning the subject today and watching these , stop now and get a textbook and a good teacher .
they really are n't very good lectures .
in fact , they are a terrible waste of your time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got my phD 20 years ago, and find these interesting.
I'm a big fan of feynman.but if you're learning the subject today and watching these, stop now and get a textbook and a good teacher.
they really aren't very good lectures.
in fact, they are a terrible waste of your time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708205</id>
	<title>Bad publicity</title>
	<author>Fzz</author>
	<datestamp>1247651940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, so I installed the Silverlight plugin for MacOS, just to see.  Oh dear.  My two-year old Mac Mini which can play DVDs, H.264, iPlayer, or Flash video, full screen, no problem, cannot play these videos without stuttering.  3 seconds of video, 200ms pause, 3 seconds of video, 200ms pause.  Unwatchable.  I'd have advised people against Silverlight anyway, but issues to do with licensing don't work well with many people.  Now I can say with certainty to my less enlightened friends and colleagues: avoid it - it doesn't work well enough for production use.
<p>
Guess I'll have to watch the YouTube versions now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so I installed the Silverlight plugin for MacOS , just to see .
Oh dear .
My two-year old Mac Mini which can play DVDs , H.264 , iPlayer , or Flash video , full screen , no problem , can not play these videos without stuttering .
3 seconds of video , 200ms pause , 3 seconds of video , 200ms pause .
Unwatchable. I 'd have advised people against Silverlight anyway , but issues to do with licensing do n't work well with many people .
Now I can say with certainty to my less enlightened friends and colleagues : avoid it - it does n't work well enough for production use .
Guess I 'll have to watch the YouTube versions now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so I installed the Silverlight plugin for MacOS, just to see.
Oh dear.
My two-year old Mac Mini which can play DVDs, H.264, iPlayer, or Flash video, full screen, no problem, cannot play these videos without stuttering.
3 seconds of video, 200ms pause, 3 seconds of video, 200ms pause.
Unwatchable.  I'd have advised people against Silverlight anyway, but issues to do with licensing don't work well with many people.
Now I can say with certainty to my less enlightened friends and colleagues: avoid it - it doesn't work well enough for production use.
Guess I'll have to watch the YouTube versions now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705589</id>
	<title>Slashdotted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it seems it's slashdotted alread, <a href="http://www.mininova.org/search/?search=feynman+lectures" title="mininova.org" rel="nofollow">here's a mirror</a> [mininova.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it seems it 's slashdotted alread , here 's a mirror [ mininova.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it seems it's slashdotted alread, here's a mirror [mininova.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706001</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>...they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel.</i> <br> <br>

And for a man worth billions of dollars, what bullshit arbitrary number do you propose he donate? I didn't know a donation had to hit you in the wallet for it to be of any use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel .
And for a man worth billions of dollars , what bullshit arbitrary number do you propose he donate ?
I did n't know a donation had to hit you in the wallet for it to be of any use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel.
And for a man worth billions of dollars, what bullshit arbitrary number do you propose he donate?
I didn't know a donation had to hit you in the wallet for it to be of any use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28717297</id>
	<title>The Real Bill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247761200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find Bill Gate's donation of videos, that require a Microsoft product to see, a very disingenuous "gift" - it should really be touted as advertising which is what they are probably writing it off as anyway.</p><p>I also find Bill's comments rather illiterate.  Did he actually comment in that manner?</p><p>Dishonest and illiterate, is that the brains behind Microsoft?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find Bill Gate 's donation of videos , that require a Microsoft product to see , a very disingenuous " gift " - it should really be touted as advertising which is what they are probably writing it off as anyway.I also find Bill 's comments rather illiterate .
Did he actually comment in that manner ? Dishonest and illiterate , is that the brains behind Microsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find Bill Gate's donation of videos, that require a Microsoft product to see, a very disingenuous "gift" - it should really be touted as advertising which is what they are probably writing it off as anyway.I also find Bill's comments rather illiterate.
Did he actually comment in that manner?Dishonest and illiterate, is that the brains behind Microsoft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706665</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247687760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?</p></div><p>What makes you think it's a knee-jerk reaction rather than a well reasoned reaction from years of experience dealing with Microsoft?
</p><p>For most users, Silverlight doesn't provide any real benefits.  The whole thing was invented, not to fill a need, but to push Microsoft's vendor lock-in.
</p><p>Sure, they support OSX.  For now.  They also used to release IE for OSX, but they stopped updating it, letting it fall behind IE for Windows, and then killed it off.  They also used to sell Outlook for OSX, before killing it and replacing it with a substandard version that didn't support Exchange servers.  Their broadness of support only seems to last as long as it takes them to dominate that particular market, and then they drop support in order to drive everyone back to Windows.
</p><p>So now, tell me, except for Microsoft putting up content like this on their own site and requiring Silverlight, what reason do I have to install the thing at all?  What reason did Microsoft have for using Silverlight instead of just letting people play the video files?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight ? What makes you think it 's a knee-jerk reaction rather than a well reasoned reaction from years of experience dealing with Microsoft ?
For most users , Silverlight does n't provide any real benefits .
The whole thing was invented , not to fill a need , but to push Microsoft 's vendor lock-in .
Sure , they support OSX .
For now .
They also used to release IE for OSX , but they stopped updating it , letting it fall behind IE for Windows , and then killed it off .
They also used to sell Outlook for OSX , before killing it and replacing it with a substandard version that did n't support Exchange servers .
Their broadness of support only seems to last as long as it takes them to dominate that particular market , and then they drop support in order to drive everyone back to Windows .
So now , tell me , except for Microsoft putting up content like this on their own site and requiring Silverlight , what reason do I have to install the thing at all ?
What reason did Microsoft have for using Silverlight instead of just letting people play the video files ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?What makes you think it's a knee-jerk reaction rather than a well reasoned reaction from years of experience dealing with Microsoft?
For most users, Silverlight doesn't provide any real benefits.
The whole thing was invented, not to fill a need, but to push Microsoft's vendor lock-in.
Sure, they support OSX.
For now.
They also used to release IE for OSX, but they stopped updating it, letting it fall behind IE for Windows, and then killed it off.
They also used to sell Outlook for OSX, before killing it and replacing it with a substandard version that didn't support Exchange servers.
Their broadness of support only seems to last as long as it takes them to dominate that particular market, and then they drop support in order to drive everyone back to Windows.
So now, tell me, except for Microsoft putting up content like this on their own site and requiring Silverlight, what reason do I have to install the thing at all?
What reason did Microsoft have for using Silverlight instead of just letting people play the video files?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711263</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247668380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So a video that requires a new plugin. Err..no thanks.</p><p>And cheers for the glimpse of the future with Natal, but i already saw Peter Molyneux showing off his, ahem, "demo" of Milo <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPIbGnBQcJY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPIbGnBQcJY</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>"True technology... [that] works today." In almost every respect it's a blatant sham. I've seen far more credible performances from the likes of Uri Geller. Say sorry Peter, like you mean it!</p><p>In one way its nice to see that Peter is settling in nicely to the Microsoft marketing team.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So a video that requires a new plugin .
Err..no thanks.And cheers for the glimpse of the future with Natal , but i already saw Peter Molyneux showing off his , ahem , " demo " of Milo http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = CPIbGnBQcJY [ youtube.com ] " True technology... [ that ] works today .
" In almost every respect it 's a blatant sham .
I 've seen far more credible performances from the likes of Uri Geller .
Say sorry Peter , like you mean it ! In one way its nice to see that Peter is settling in nicely to the Microsoft marketing team .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So a video that requires a new plugin.
Err..no thanks.And cheers for the glimpse of the future with Natal, but i already saw Peter Molyneux showing off his, ahem, "demo" of Milo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPIbGnBQcJY [youtube.com]"True technology... [that] works today.
" In almost every respect it's a blatant sham.
I've seen far more credible performances from the likes of Uri Geller.
Say sorry Peter, like you mean it!In one way its nice to see that Peter is settling in nicely to the Microsoft marketing team.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706827</id>
	<title>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1247688420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because of all the possible video formats out there, he just happens to choose Silverlight? How convenient.</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>Summing up: I don't want yet another passing Microsoft fad installed on my machine which will add more vulnerabilities and be downloading weekly "reboot required" updates for the next ten years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because of all the possible video formats out there , he just happens to choose Silverlight ?
How convenient .
  Summing up : I do n't want yet another passing Microsoft fad installed on my machine which will add more vulnerabilities and be downloading weekly " reboot required " updates for the next ten years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because of all the possible video formats out there, he just happens to choose Silverlight?
How convenient.
  Summing up: I don't want yet another passing Microsoft fad installed on my machine which will add more vulnerabilities and be downloading weekly "reboot required" updates for the next ten years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706549</id>
	<title>Re:The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1247687280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh, and regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)...Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?</p></div><p>Isn't Windows Mobile still running a different kernel, even, then Vista?  Chrome and Android are both going to be Linux, and who knows how much they'll share.  How many different Windows operating systems are there, including all the different ones that use the same kernel?  How many versions of Windows Server are there?  How many of Windows on the desktop?  Are there different versions of Windows Mobile?
</p><p>Microsoft has a lot more than 2 operating systems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and regarding Bill 's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS 's ( Chrome and Android ) ...Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista ? Is n't Windows Mobile still running a different kernel , even , then Vista ?
Chrome and Android are both going to be Linux , and who knows how much they 'll share .
How many different Windows operating systems are there , including all the different ones that use the same kernel ?
How many versions of Windows Server are there ?
How many of Windows on the desktop ?
Are there different versions of Windows Mobile ?
Microsoft has a lot more than 2 operating systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)...Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?Isn't Windows Mobile still running a different kernel, even, then Vista?
Chrome and Android are both going to be Linux, and who knows how much they'll share.
How many different Windows operating systems are there, including all the different ones that use the same kernel?
How many versions of Windows Server are there?
How many of Windows on the desktop?
Are there different versions of Windows Mobile?
Microsoft has a lot more than 2 operating systems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just put a brick through the monitor and kick the tower over. Much better stress reliever, plus it gives you an excuse to buy a Mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just put a brick through the monitor and kick the tower over .
Much better stress reliever , plus it gives you an excuse to buy a Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just put a brick through the monitor and kick the tower over.
Much better stress reliever, plus it gives you an excuse to buy a Mac.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707443</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>benwaggoner</author>
	<datestamp>1247691360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I already have a video player on my system, and Silverlight offers me nothing that I can't do without it.</p></div><p>Sure it can. Check out the player experience, and its navigation, commentary, captioning, etcetera. And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.</p><p><a href="http://alexzambelli.com/blog/2009/03/27/smooth-streaming-white-paper/" title="alexzambelli.com">http://alexzambelli.com/blog/2009/03/27/smooth-streaming-white-paper/</a> [alexzambelli.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my system</p></div><p>FWIW, Silverlight so far has had 0 exploits over three versions. It's done well compared to other media players in the same period. One advantage of a relatively recent technology is that it was designed for security from the get-go, after the web had shifted to its current "presumed hostile" state.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already have a video player on my system , and Silverlight offers me nothing that I ca n't do without it.Sure it can .
Check out the player experience , and its navigation , commentary , captioning , etcetera .
And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.http : //alexzambelli.com/blog/2009/03/27/smooth-streaming-white-paper/ [ alexzambelli.com ] It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my systemFWIW , Silverlight so far has had 0 exploits over three versions .
It 's done well compared to other media players in the same period .
One advantage of a relatively recent technology is that it was designed for security from the get-go , after the web had shifted to its current " presumed hostile " state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I already have a video player on my system, and Silverlight offers me nothing that I can't do without it.Sure it can.
Check out the player experience, and its navigation, commentary, captioning, etcetera.
And it uses Smooth Streaming to provide proxy-cachable video at multiple bitrates.http://alexzambelli.com/blog/2009/03/27/smooth-streaming-white-paper/ [alexzambelli.com] It does however potentially contain vulnerabilities that could compromise my systemFWIW, Silverlight so far has had 0 exploits over three versions.
It's done well compared to other media players in the same period.
One advantage of a relatively recent technology is that it was designed for security from the get-go, after the web had shifted to its current "presumed hostile" state.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705611</id>
	<title>A model for the world, but not for Microsoft...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To quote Gates from the article:<br>Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it broadly available for free.<br>and "...With super-high-quality material like this up there for free, I hope people see the potential, and that they'd benefit from this one in particular, and then it starts to push forward the idea if someone is great lecturer, then their work should be out there and available."<br>This philosophy of course does not apply to work of inferior software companies, which can charge exorbitant amounts for their software. But great lecturers'<br>work should be made available for free.</p><p>Truly philanthropic...Kudos!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To quote Gates from the article : Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it broadly available for free.and " ...With super-high-quality material like this up there for free , I hope people see the potential , and that they 'd benefit from this one in particular , and then it starts to push forward the idea if someone is great lecturer , then their work should be out there and available .
" This philosophy of course does not apply to work of inferior software companies , which can charge exorbitant amounts for their software .
But great lecturers'work should be made available for free.Truly philanthropic...Kudos !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To quote Gates from the article:Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it broadly available for free.and "...With super-high-quality material like this up there for free, I hope people see the potential, and that they'd benefit from this one in particular, and then it starts to push forward the idea if someone is great lecturer, then their work should be out there and available.
"This philosophy of course does not apply to work of inferior software companies, which can charge exorbitant amounts for their software.
But great lecturers'work should be made available for free.Truly philanthropic...Kudos!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706761</id>
	<title>Localization</title>
	<author>Roger W Moore</author>
	<datestamp>1247688180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with that is it would have to learn to recognize different gestures. For example in the UK we use two fingers a gesture dating back to Agincourt when the French would cut off those same two fingers of any English they captured so that they could not draw a longbow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with that is it would have to learn to recognize different gestures .
For example in the UK we use two fingers a gesture dating back to Agincourt when the French would cut off those same two fingers of any English they captured so that they could not draw a longbow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with that is it would have to learn to recognize different gestures.
For example in the UK we use two fingers a gesture dating back to Agincourt when the French would cut off those same two fingers of any English they captured so that they could not draw a longbow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705961</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>metageek</author>
	<datestamp>1247684340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>however much we dislike Gates and M$, we must recognize that he is a serious philantropist and has a record on donations to charity, particularly towards serious world problems like malaria, measles, etc. That is something good I can say about him. Silverlight, on the other hand, is not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>however much we dislike Gates and M $ , we must recognize that he is a serious philantropist and has a record on donations to charity , particularly towards serious world problems like malaria , measles , etc .
That is something good I can say about him .
Silverlight , on the other hand , is not : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>however much we dislike Gates and M$, we must recognize that he is a serious philantropist and has a record on donations to charity, particularly towards serious world problems like malaria, measles, etc.
That is something good I can say about him.
Silverlight, on the other hand, is not :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708197</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247651940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do you also whine like a bitch at the fact that youtube uses flash? or is it only the evil micro$$$$$$$$oft that gets you all worked up into a blithering rabid rage?</p><p>seriously, you are the biggest moron i've seen on this site, apart from twitter. if your dick was falling off from all of the vd's you probably have from all the hookers you fuck, and if bill gates funded the research into a cure, you'd probably still find a reason to hate him.</p><p>you're a fucking idiot and a fucking asshole. you'll probably rot in hell before he does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do you also whine like a bitch at the fact that youtube uses flash ?
or is it only the evil micro $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ oft that gets you all worked up into a blithering rabid rage ? seriously , you are the biggest moron i 've seen on this site , apart from twitter .
if your dick was falling off from all of the vd 's you probably have from all the hookers you fuck , and if bill gates funded the research into a cure , you 'd probably still find a reason to hate him.you 're a fucking idiot and a fucking asshole .
you 'll probably rot in hell before he does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do you also whine like a bitch at the fact that youtube uses flash?
or is it only the evil micro$$$$$$$$oft that gets you all worked up into a blithering rabid rage?seriously, you are the biggest moron i've seen on this site, apart from twitter.
if your dick was falling off from all of the vd's you probably have from all the hookers you fuck, and if bill gates funded the research into a cure, you'd probably still find a reason to hate him.you're a fucking idiot and a fucking asshole.
you'll probably rot in hell before he does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707663</id>
	<title>Re:The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>Your.Master</author>
	<datestamp>1247649180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't see him complaining that Google has to OS's, I saw him commenting that Google having a netbook OS was nothing new.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't see him complaining that Google has to OS 's , I saw him commenting that Google having a netbook OS was nothing new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't see him complaining that Google has to OS's, I saw him commenting that Google having a netbook OS was nothing new.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</id>
	<title>ALERT:  Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>
This is less about distributing knowledge and more about increasing distribution of Microsoft's video/web-technology, Silverlight .</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is less about distributing knowledge and more about increasing distribution of Microsoft 's video/web-technology , Silverlight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This is less about distributing knowledge and more about increasing distribution of Microsoft's video/web-technology, Silverlight .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705465</id>
	<title>How badly do I want to see it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly, not badly enough to want to install Silverlight on my PC.<br>I'm not planning on installing it until A) I need it to access critical websites (that is, critical by my definition - sites for my bank and credit cards, for example) and B) the Flashblock plugin will treat Silverlight on webpages like it does Flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , not badly enough to want to install Silverlight on my PC.I 'm not planning on installing it until A ) I need it to access critical websites ( that is , critical by my definition - sites for my bank and credit cards , for example ) and B ) the Flashblock plugin will treat Silverlight on webpages like it does Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, not badly enough to want to install Silverlight on my PC.I'm not planning on installing it until A) I need it to access critical websites (that is, critical by my definition - sites for my bank and credit cards, for example) and B) the Flashblock plugin will treat Silverlight on webpages like it does Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707941</id>
	<title>Re:Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1247650440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
TFA doesn't explain what Gates actually did with the rights: whether he went ahead and put the videos in the public domain, or is just making them free-as-in-beer on microscoft.com, or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what? Can someone who has silverlight check the beginning and end of the video, and see whether it says anything about licensing, copyright, etc.?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA does n't explain what Gates actually did with the rights : whether he went ahead and put the videos in the public domain , or is just making them free-as-in-beer on microscoft.com , or ... what ? Can someone who has silverlight check the beginning and end of the video , and see whether it says anything about licensing , copyright , etc .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
TFA doesn't explain what Gates actually did with the rights: whether he went ahead and put the videos in the public domain, or is just making them free-as-in-beer on microscoft.com, or ... what? Can someone who has silverlight check the beginning and end of the video, and see whether it says anything about licensing, copyright, etc.
?
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710977</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247666340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What Vulnerabilities does Silverlight have?</p><p>Flash has many reported exploits, show me just one for Silverlight...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What Vulnerabilities does Silverlight have ? Flash has many reported exploits , show me just one for Silverlight.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Vulnerabilities does Silverlight have?Flash has many reported exploits, show me just one for Silverlight...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</id>
	<title>Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>dan\_sdot</author>
	<datestamp>1247682600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web</p></div></blockquote><p>
Well, one reason I can say for sure is that he happens to have billions of dollars in his bank account.  So the cost of doing this is amounts to a rounding error in his checking account.  Let's not ascribe too much a sense of moral duty to him for doing this.
<br> <br>
When people sing the praises of the ultra-wealthy who donate a bit of money to this or that, it makes me annoyed a little bit.  On the one hand, yes, it is good for them to give money to good causes.  But on the other hand, they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel.  Some do, but most don't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web Well , one reason I can say for sure is that he happens to have billions of dollars in his bank account .
So the cost of doing this is amounts to a rounding error in his checking account .
Let 's not ascribe too much a sense of moral duty to him for doing this .
When people sing the praises of the ultra-wealthy who donate a bit of money to this or that , it makes me annoyed a little bit .
On the one hand , yes , it is good for them to give money to good causes .
But on the other hand , they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel .
Some do , but most do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He goes into why he spent his own money to make a series of classic physics lectures available free on the Web
Well, one reason I can say for sure is that he happens to have billions of dollars in his bank account.
So the cost of doing this is amounts to a rounding error in his checking account.
Let's not ascribe too much a sense of moral duty to him for doing this.
When people sing the praises of the ultra-wealthy who donate a bit of money to this or that, it makes me annoyed a little bit.
On the one hand, yes, it is good for them to give money to good causes.
But on the other hand, they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel.
Some do, but most don't.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708871</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247655180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...anything close to being something that they would actually feel. "</p><p>ou don't know a lot of rich people, do you?</p><p>I do, through an odd marriage.<br>In fact, I went to ones funeral, when they were talking about him, they said "And he never borrowed any money, not even for a cup of coffee" Like that was the highest praise you could assign someone.</p><p>Rich people are usually very aware of every dollar.</p><p>There probably more aware of it's worth, and value then people who aren't rich. If they aren't then soon they won't be rich.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...anything close to being something that they would actually feel .
" ou do n't know a lot of rich people , do you ? I do , through an odd marriage.In fact , I went to ones funeral , when they were talking about him , they said " And he never borrowed any money , not even for a cup of coffee " Like that was the highest praise you could assign someone.Rich people are usually very aware of every dollar.There probably more aware of it 's worth , and value then people who are n't rich .
If they are n't then soon they wo n't be rich .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...anything close to being something that they would actually feel.
"ou don't know a lot of rich people, do you?I do, through an odd marriage.In fact, I went to ones funeral, when they were talking about him, they said "And he never borrowed any money, not even for a cup of coffee" Like that was the highest praise you could assign someone.Rich people are usually very aware of every dollar.There probably more aware of it's worth, and value then people who aren't rich.
If they aren't then soon they won't be rich.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714633</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247746200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For most users, Silverlight doesn't provide any real benefits. The whole thing was invented, not to fill a need, but to push Microsoft's vendor lock-in."</p><p>Sorry but that's bollocks. You're not looking at it objectively.</p><p>Lock-in suggests that they're forced into using specific technologies, the reality is though that Microsoft technologies really are just best of breed for most companies needs. Lock-in is when you have situations like has been posted here on Slashdot in the last day, the story about Apple "updating" iTunes to prevent the pre syncing with it - now THAT is lockin, artificially making sure people use your device to connect to your software.</p><p>If you have this situation where you have a choice of Visual Studio, ASP.NET and Silverlight as your unified toolchain (because unified toolchains ultimately allow for better productivity) or the choice of Dreamweaver, Coldfusion and Flash then it's really a no brainer.</p><p>Hell, if Adobe don't want to invest in making Coldfusion worthwhile so that they can offer a true competitor to the rich internet apps market then there's not even anything stopping them producing better integration options for Flash into Micrososft's toolchain.</p><p>It's idiotic to suggest companies are locked in because they choose a suite because it's simply the best offering out there for there needs and you see there's the crux of it.</p><p>You say "most users" as if you've actually researched into how many users do and don't benefit from Silverlight. You ask what benefit it is to you, but in doing this you miss the point completely, to put it bluntly, you personally are not important. It is the people developing rich internet apps that matter to Microsoft, if they can convince them that their product is better (and frankly that's not hard, because simply put, it is) such that they can produce what they need to produce with less overall cost and so on then "most users" on the internet simply wont care about whether they have to accept their browsers prompts to install Silverlight, just as they don't with Flash. They'll just do it.</p><p>I don't want to see Microsoft gain dominance with Silverlight over Flash, in fact, I don't like Flash either, I think the real solution to RIAs is to improve Javascript etc. What bugs me though is arguments like yours that seem to blame Microsoft when all Microsoft has done is do a better job for developers than the other guy. It's like saying "Stop being good at what you do Microsoft" and this is what large swathes of the FOSS community miss.</p><p>Where is the FOSS challenger to an unified RIA suite? PHP would make a good start for the server side language, but it needs an IDE as good as Visual Studio (Eclipse is close, but not there yet) and an RIA toolchain that is better than Flash/Silverlight and also integrates well with the Eclipse/PHP (or whatever) toolchain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For most users , Silverlight does n't provide any real benefits .
The whole thing was invented , not to fill a need , but to push Microsoft 's vendor lock-in .
" Sorry but that 's bollocks .
You 're not looking at it objectively.Lock-in suggests that they 're forced into using specific technologies , the reality is though that Microsoft technologies really are just best of breed for most companies needs .
Lock-in is when you have situations like has been posted here on Slashdot in the last day , the story about Apple " updating " iTunes to prevent the pre syncing with it - now THAT is lockin , artificially making sure people use your device to connect to your software.If you have this situation where you have a choice of Visual Studio , ASP.NET and Silverlight as your unified toolchain ( because unified toolchains ultimately allow for better productivity ) or the choice of Dreamweaver , Coldfusion and Flash then it 's really a no brainer.Hell , if Adobe do n't want to invest in making Coldfusion worthwhile so that they can offer a true competitor to the rich internet apps market then there 's not even anything stopping them producing better integration options for Flash into Micrososft 's toolchain.It 's idiotic to suggest companies are locked in because they choose a suite because it 's simply the best offering out there for there needs and you see there 's the crux of it.You say " most users " as if you 've actually researched into how many users do and do n't benefit from Silverlight .
You ask what benefit it is to you , but in doing this you miss the point completely , to put it bluntly , you personally are not important .
It is the people developing rich internet apps that matter to Microsoft , if they can convince them that their product is better ( and frankly that 's not hard , because simply put , it is ) such that they can produce what they need to produce with less overall cost and so on then " most users " on the internet simply wont care about whether they have to accept their browsers prompts to install Silverlight , just as they do n't with Flash .
They 'll just do it.I do n't want to see Microsoft gain dominance with Silverlight over Flash , in fact , I do n't like Flash either , I think the real solution to RIAs is to improve Javascript etc .
What bugs me though is arguments like yours that seem to blame Microsoft when all Microsoft has done is do a better job for developers than the other guy .
It 's like saying " Stop being good at what you do Microsoft " and this is what large swathes of the FOSS community miss.Where is the FOSS challenger to an unified RIA suite ?
PHP would make a good start for the server side language , but it needs an IDE as good as Visual Studio ( Eclipse is close , but not there yet ) and an RIA toolchain that is better than Flash/Silverlight and also integrates well with the Eclipse/PHP ( or whatever ) toolchain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For most users, Silverlight doesn't provide any real benefits.
The whole thing was invented, not to fill a need, but to push Microsoft's vendor lock-in.
"Sorry but that's bollocks.
You're not looking at it objectively.Lock-in suggests that they're forced into using specific technologies, the reality is though that Microsoft technologies really are just best of breed for most companies needs.
Lock-in is when you have situations like has been posted here on Slashdot in the last day, the story about Apple "updating" iTunes to prevent the pre syncing with it - now THAT is lockin, artificially making sure people use your device to connect to your software.If you have this situation where you have a choice of Visual Studio, ASP.NET and Silverlight as your unified toolchain (because unified toolchains ultimately allow for better productivity) or the choice of Dreamweaver, Coldfusion and Flash then it's really a no brainer.Hell, if Adobe don't want to invest in making Coldfusion worthwhile so that they can offer a true competitor to the rich internet apps market then there's not even anything stopping them producing better integration options for Flash into Micrososft's toolchain.It's idiotic to suggest companies are locked in because they choose a suite because it's simply the best offering out there for there needs and you see there's the crux of it.You say "most users" as if you've actually researched into how many users do and don't benefit from Silverlight.
You ask what benefit it is to you, but in doing this you miss the point completely, to put it bluntly, you personally are not important.
It is the people developing rich internet apps that matter to Microsoft, if they can convince them that their product is better (and frankly that's not hard, because simply put, it is) such that they can produce what they need to produce with less overall cost and so on then "most users" on the internet simply wont care about whether they have to accept their browsers prompts to install Silverlight, just as they don't with Flash.
They'll just do it.I don't want to see Microsoft gain dominance with Silverlight over Flash, in fact, I don't like Flash either, I think the real solution to RIAs is to improve Javascript etc.
What bugs me though is arguments like yours that seem to blame Microsoft when all Microsoft has done is do a better job for developers than the other guy.
It's like saying "Stop being good at what you do Microsoft" and this is what large swathes of the FOSS community miss.Where is the FOSS challenger to an unified RIA suite?
PHP would make a good start for the server side language, but it needs an IDE as good as Visual Studio (Eclipse is close, but not there yet) and an RIA toolchain that is better than Flash/Silverlight and also integrates well with the Eclipse/PHP (or whatever) toolchain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</id>
	<title>The bigger problem...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't care that it's MS Research.  The irritating part is that my "browser is not compatible" because I don't use silverlight.</p><p>Oh, and regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS, DUMBSHIT!  Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care that it 's MS Research .
The irritating part is that my " browser is not compatible " because I do n't use silverlight.Oh , and regarding Bill 's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS 's ( Chrome and Android ) ... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS , DUMBSHIT !
Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care that it's MS Research.
The irritating part is that my "browser is not compatible" because I don't use silverlight.Oh, and regarding Bill's comments on it being a bad idea for Google to have two OS's (Chrome and Android)... MS HAS MORE THAN ONE OS, DUMBSHIT!
Is Gates so out of touch that he thinks that win mobiles run Vista?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706019</id>
	<title>the virtual machine is your friend</title>
	<author>ei4anb</author>
	<datestamp>1247684640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It installs and plays on XP in a virtual machine. That's very apt if you think about since Feynman did so much to help our understanding of virtual particles<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It installs and plays on XP in a virtual machine .
That 's very apt if you think about since Feynman did so much to help our understanding of virtual particles : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It installs and plays on XP in a virtual machine.
That's very apt if you think about since Feynman did so much to help our understanding of virtual particles :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>SpectreBlofeld</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah well, you're missing out. I watched two lectures last night and was impressed (my first silverlight experience). I use my cell phone as a modem and thus don't get a create connection speed, and watching videos usually requires me to buffer for some time... the lectures played fine and in decent quality. What impressed me, though, were the closed captions that were displayed below the video window.</p><p>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight? Is it because it doesn't have full Linux support yet? By that regard, by cell phone sucks, my vid card sucks, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah well , you 're missing out .
I watched two lectures last night and was impressed ( my first silverlight experience ) .
I use my cell phone as a modem and thus do n't get a create connection speed , and watching videos usually requires me to buffer for some time... the lectures played fine and in decent quality .
What impressed me , though , were the closed captions that were displayed below the video window.Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight ?
Is it because it does n't have full Linux support yet ?
By that regard , by cell phone sucks , my vid card sucks , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah well, you're missing out.
I watched two lectures last night and was impressed (my first silverlight experience).
I use my cell phone as a modem and thus don't get a create connection speed, and watching videos usually requires me to buffer for some time... the lectures played fine and in decent quality.
What impressed me, though, were the closed captions that were displayed below the video window.Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?
Is it because it doesn't have full Linux support yet?
By that regard, by cell phone sucks, my vid card sucks, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707283</id>
	<title>Feynman roolzorz</title>
	<author>Benfea</author>
	<datestamp>1247690640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I may actually install Silverlight for this. Feynman was the shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I may actually install Silverlight for this .
Feynman was the shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may actually install Silverlight for this.
Feynman was the shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706691</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247687880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so. fuckin. what.</p><p>and you are less about distributing sperm and more about perpetuating successful genes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so .
fuckin. what.and you are less about distributing sperm and more about perpetuating successful genes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so.
fuckin. what.and you are less about distributing sperm and more about perpetuating successful genes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705791</id>
	<title>It may not be a joke</title>
	<author>bickle</author>
	<datestamp>1247683680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The bit about cows may not be a joke, as there was a similar story on Slashdot not long ago:

<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/24/1710252" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/24/1710252</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bit about cows may not be a joke , as there was a similar story on Slashdot not long ago : http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/06/24/1710252 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bit about cows may not be a joke, as there was a similar story on Slashdot not long ago:

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/24/1710252 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706969</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1247689080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who really gives a shit?  Seriously.  So what do I care; I'll install it, then after I'm done watching the lectures I'll keep it or I won't.  Someone has a great sig - nerd rage truly is the funniest of rages.  And Bill Gates rage is at the top of the mountain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who really gives a shit ?
Seriously. So what do I care ; I 'll install it , then after I 'm done watching the lectures I 'll keep it or I wo n't .
Someone has a great sig - nerd rage truly is the funniest of rages .
And Bill Gates rage is at the top of the mountain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who really gives a shit?
Seriously.  So what do I care; I'll install it, then after I'm done watching the lectures I'll keep it or I won't.
Someone has a great sig - nerd rage truly is the funniest of rages.
And Bill Gates rage is at the top of the mountain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707297</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247690700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.  The content is only kinda free.</p></div><p>Wrong. Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.</p><p>Silverlight for Mac-&gt; <a href="http://silverlight.dlservice.microsoft.com/download/9/5/E/95E973B3-17C1-459B-AA1B-20827B867D15/Silverlight.dmg" title="microsoft.com">download</a> [microsoft.com] </p><p>And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions instead
Mono-&gt; <a href="http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight" title="mono-project.com">download</a> [mono-project.com] </p></div><p>I'll give you 3 reasons to not use Silverlight, even the Mono implementation:</p><ol>
<li>embrace</li><li>extend</li><li>extinguish</li></ol></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because requiring Silverlight ( and therefore Windows ) severely dilutes the notion that Gate 's action is altruistic .
The content is only kinda free.Wrong .
Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.Silverlight for Mac- &gt; download [ microsoft.com ] And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions instead Mono- &gt; download [ mono-project.com ] I 'll give you 3 reasons to not use Silverlight , even the Mono implementation : embraceextendextinguish</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.
The content is only kinda free.Wrong.
Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.Silverlight for Mac-&gt; download [microsoft.com] And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions instead
Mono-&gt; download [mono-project.com] I'll give you 3 reasons to not use Silverlight, even the Mono implementation:
embraceextendextinguish
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706523</id>
	<title>Re:Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>jmichaelg</author>
	<datestamp>1247687220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This first-hand article gives a bit of insight into how Bill Gates ran Microsoft. Certainly doesn't give the impression that Gates was stupid.</p><p><a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html" title="joelonsoftware.com">http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html</a> [joelonsoftware.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This first-hand article gives a bit of insight into how Bill Gates ran Microsoft .
Certainly does n't give the impression that Gates was stupid.http : //www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html [ joelonsoftware.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This first-hand article gives a bit of insight into how Bill Gates ran Microsoft.
Certainly doesn't give the impression that Gates was stupid.http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/06/16.html [joelonsoftware.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705809</id>
	<title>Re:Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247683740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Some MS products are cool.</i></p><p>I wouldn't say it's "cool", but I like Excel better than any other spreadsheet I've tried. Their mouse is pretty good, and my daughter (who works at Gamestop) likes her X-box.</p><p><i>Some are awful.</i></p><p>Yes, about every other MS product I've had the displeasure to use, including some (e.g. FoxPro) that I use to love that MS ganked up to utter unuseability.</p><p><i>But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.</i></p><p>He's not stupid by any means, but he DID get lucky. If he wasn't the son of two IBM lawyers and the CP/M guy hadn't told IBM to go piss up a rope, your computer wouldn't be running Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some MS products are cool.I would n't say it 's " cool " , but I like Excel better than any other spreadsheet I 've tried .
Their mouse is pretty good , and my daughter ( who works at Gamestop ) likes her X-box.Some are awful.Yes , about every other MS product I 've had the displeasure to use , including some ( e.g .
FoxPro ) that I use to love that MS ganked up to utter unuseability.But I do have to say that Gates does n't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.He 's not stupid by any means , but he DID get lucky .
If he was n't the son of two IBM lawyers and the CP/M guy had n't told IBM to go piss up a rope , your computer would n't be running Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some MS products are cool.I wouldn't say it's "cool", but I like Excel better than any other spreadsheet I've tried.
Their mouse is pretty good, and my daughter (who works at Gamestop) likes her X-box.Some are awful.Yes, about every other MS product I've had the displeasure to use, including some (e.g.
FoxPro) that I use to love that MS ganked up to utter unuseability.But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.He's not stupid by any means, but he DID get lucky.
If he wasn't the son of two IBM lawyers and the CP/M guy hadn't told IBM to go piss up a rope, your computer wouldn't be running Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706659</id>
	<title>Why did Bill Gates have to pay to buy the rights?</title>
	<author>Question Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1247687700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So let me get this straight: an employee of a public institution (Cal Tech) gave some speeches that were recorded by a government-funded entity (the BBC), and in order to release those recordings to the public, a private individual (Bill Gates) had to purchase the rights?  And rather than release in them in a standards-based format, we instead have to to download and install proprietary software (Silverlight) that we may not want on our computers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this straight : an employee of a public institution ( Cal Tech ) gave some speeches that were recorded by a government-funded entity ( the BBC ) , and in order to release those recordings to the public , a private individual ( Bill Gates ) had to purchase the rights ?
And rather than release in them in a standards-based format , we instead have to to download and install proprietary software ( Silverlight ) that we may not want on our computers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this straight: an employee of a public institution (Cal Tech) gave some speeches that were recorded by a government-funded entity (the BBC), and in order to release those recordings to the public, a private individual (Bill Gates) had to purchase the rights?
And rather than release in them in a standards-based format, we instead have to to download and install proprietary software (Silverlight) that we may not want on our computers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706303</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1247686140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?</p></div><p>It might have something to do with the knee-jerk reactions to Linux from Microsoft's CEO.  When one starts rattling sabers, it's not entirely unfair to think that there might be a willingness to follow through.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight ? It might have something to do with the knee-jerk reactions to Linux from Microsoft 's CEO .
When one starts rattling sabers , it 's not entirely unfair to think that there might be a willingness to follow through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?It might have something to do with the knee-jerk reactions to Linux from Microsoft's CEO.
When one starts rattling sabers, it's not entirely unfair to think that there might be a willingness to follow through.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705505</id>
	<title>Wow, hardhitting stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does he also reminisce about how 640K will be enough for anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does he also reminisce about how 640K will be enough for anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does he also reminisce about how 640K will be enough for anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28715527</id>
	<title>Silverlight</title>
	<author>grimborg</author>
	<datestamp>1247753640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, using silverlight, so watching them in GNU/Linux is both difficult... and impossible.

They can shove the lectures up their asses and i goddamn well hope it explodes and they're left with their balls hanging from the bell towers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , using silverlight , so watching them in GNU/Linux is both difficult... and impossible .
They can shove the lectures up their asses and i goddamn well hope it explodes and they 're left with their balls hanging from the bell towers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, using silverlight, so watching them in GNU/Linux is both difficult... and impossible.
They can shove the lectures up their asses and i goddamn well hope it explodes and they're left with their balls hanging from the bell towers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</id>
	<title>Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the interview was actually somewhat interesting.  I have to say that, whatever I think about MS, Gates is a pretty interesting guy... and appears to be pretty smart and "well rounded.  IMO, he made a pretty insightful (mod him +1<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) ) comment about Google... the more vague it is, the more interesting it is.</p><p>Meh.  I didn't like Vista, and kinda like 7 so far.  Some MS products are cool.  Some are awful.  But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the interview was actually somewhat interesting .
I have to say that , whatever I think about MS , Gates is a pretty interesting guy... and appears to be pretty smart and " well rounded .
IMO , he made a pretty insightful ( mod him + 1 ; ) ) comment about Google... the more vague it is , the more interesting it is.Meh .
I did n't like Vista , and kinda like 7 so far .
Some MS products are cool .
Some are awful .
But I do have to say that Gates does n't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the interview was actually somewhat interesting.
I have to say that, whatever I think about MS, Gates is a pretty interesting guy... and appears to be pretty smart and "well rounded.
IMO, he made a pretty insightful (mod him +1 ;) ) comment about Google... the more vague it is, the more interesting it is.Meh.
I didn't like Vista, and kinda like 7 so far.
Some MS products are cool.
Some are awful.
But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705703</id>
	<title>Wonders of Physics for Everyone</title>
	<author>StylusEater</author>
	<datestamp>1247683380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Billy G wants to bring "...[the wonders of science to everyone]..." except for those of us not using Internet Explorer...ahhh...so refreshing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Billy G wants to bring " ... [ the wonders of science to everyone ] ... " except for those of us not using Internet Explorer...ahhh...so refreshing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Billy G wants to bring "...[the wonders of science to everyone]..." except for those of us not using Internet Explorer...ahhh...so refreshing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707915</id>
	<title>Re:Why did Bill Gates have to pay to buy the right</title>
	<author>AlexBirch</author>
	<datestamp>1247650320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And rather than release in them in a standards-based format, we instead have to to download and install proprietary software (Silverlight) that we may not want on our computers?</p></div><p>
Silverlight (WMV) is in a standards based format, you can check it out in Mono.<br>Flash too is proprietary software. If I were Adobe, I would make a 20 dollar version of Photoshop for Linux. Or even team up with Ubuntu to have Adobumtu, that has heavily discounted Adobe software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And rather than release in them in a standards-based format , we instead have to to download and install proprietary software ( Silverlight ) that we may not want on our computers ?
Silverlight ( WMV ) is in a standards based format , you can check it out in Mono.Flash too is proprietary software .
If I were Adobe , I would make a 20 dollar version of Photoshop for Linux .
Or even team up with Ubuntu to have Adobumtu , that has heavily discounted Adobe software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And rather than release in them in a standards-based format, we instead have to to download and install proprietary software (Silverlight) that we may not want on our computers?
Silverlight (WMV) is in a standards based format, you can check it out in Mono.Flash too is proprietary software.
If I were Adobe, I would make a 20 dollar version of Photoshop for Linux.
Or even team up with Ubuntu to have Adobumtu, that has heavily discounted Adobe software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706297</id>
	<title>Re:Trying to keep an open mind...</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1247686140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're not thinking on the same level.
<br> <br>
Gates's assertion is that the ideology of a browser is being warped and abused because the technology driving it is being intermingled with the notion of being able to see and search for stuff. While this is somewhat critical with Google's approach of centralizing the browser in the OS, it's also kind of sidestepping the question.
<br> <br>
See, in the beginning, when communication was simple and numbers were small, browsers were used to do just that --- browse the contents on the Web, and nothing else. Interaction with those contents was done behind the curtain, and changes magically appeared before you. As the complexity and usefulness of the Internet increased, people naturally felt that a one-way interaction with the Web would not be possible. Hence, the browser became more like a communicator of sorts (no, not Netscape Communicator), which is kind of what it is today.
<br> <br>
Now, I don't think that Gates really answered the question; in fact, I think he purposefully diverted from it. The truth of the matter is that as the Internet assumes more and more responsibilities previously relegated to client-side applications, the "browser" (or whatever you want to call it) will increasingly gain central relevance. He knows (hopefully) that Microsoft will need to start investing more time in centralizing the Internet experience for its users <b>in a way that stays consistent with their previous working model.</b> However, they should get credit where it's due: they have been trying (albeit going in the wrong direction) since Windows 98 and the inception of Active Desktop. (Remember that? In digression, who actually makes a web page their desktop? Who ever did?)
<br> <br>
This is one of the reasons why Google, if they actually decide to do it, can afford to essentially make the entire GUI contained in a browser (or something of sorts) and Microsoft cannot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not thinking on the same level .
Gates 's assertion is that the ideology of a browser is being warped and abused because the technology driving it is being intermingled with the notion of being able to see and search for stuff .
While this is somewhat critical with Google 's approach of centralizing the browser in the OS , it 's also kind of sidestepping the question .
See , in the beginning , when communication was simple and numbers were small , browsers were used to do just that --- browse the contents on the Web , and nothing else .
Interaction with those contents was done behind the curtain , and changes magically appeared before you .
As the complexity and usefulness of the Internet increased , people naturally felt that a one-way interaction with the Web would not be possible .
Hence , the browser became more like a communicator of sorts ( no , not Netscape Communicator ) , which is kind of what it is today .
Now , I do n't think that Gates really answered the question ; in fact , I think he purposefully diverted from it .
The truth of the matter is that as the Internet assumes more and more responsibilities previously relegated to client-side applications , the " browser " ( or whatever you want to call it ) will increasingly gain central relevance .
He knows ( hopefully ) that Microsoft will need to start investing more time in centralizing the Internet experience for its users in a way that stays consistent with their previous working model .
However , they should get credit where it 's due : they have been trying ( albeit going in the wrong direction ) since Windows 98 and the inception of Active Desktop .
( Remember that ?
In digression , who actually makes a web page their desktop ?
Who ever did ?
) This is one of the reasons why Google , if they actually decide to do it , can afford to essentially make the entire GUI contained in a browser ( or something of sorts ) and Microsoft can not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not thinking on the same level.
Gates's assertion is that the ideology of a browser is being warped and abused because the technology driving it is being intermingled with the notion of being able to see and search for stuff.
While this is somewhat critical with Google's approach of centralizing the browser in the OS, it's also kind of sidestepping the question.
See, in the beginning, when communication was simple and numbers were small, browsers were used to do just that --- browse the contents on the Web, and nothing else.
Interaction with those contents was done behind the curtain, and changes magically appeared before you.
As the complexity and usefulness of the Internet increased, people naturally felt that a one-way interaction with the Web would not be possible.
Hence, the browser became more like a communicator of sorts (no, not Netscape Communicator), which is kind of what it is today.
Now, I don't think that Gates really answered the question; in fact, I think he purposefully diverted from it.
The truth of the matter is that as the Internet assumes more and more responsibilities previously relegated to client-side applications, the "browser" (or whatever you want to call it) will increasingly gain central relevance.
He knows (hopefully) that Microsoft will need to start investing more time in centralizing the Internet experience for its users in a way that stays consistent with their previous working model.
However, they should get credit where it's due: they have been trying (albeit going in the wrong direction) since Windows 98 and the inception of Active Desktop.
(Remember that?
In digression, who actually makes a web page their desktop?
Who ever did?
)
 
This is one of the reasons why Google, if they actually decide to do it, can afford to essentially make the entire GUI contained in a browser (or something of sorts) and Microsoft cannot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706885</id>
	<title>Torrents? Downloads?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Torrents?</p><p>Silverlight/Tuva cannot buffer like youtube (read: download in background), videos are next to useless for me. Stutters after ~3 sec... 3sec... Very annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Torrents ? Silverlight/Tuva can not buffer like youtube ( read : download in background ) , videos are next to useless for me .
Stutters after ~ 3 sec... 3sec... Very annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Torrents?Silverlight/Tuva cannot buffer like youtube (read: download in background), videos are next to useless for me.
Stutters after ~3 sec... 3sec... Very annoying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705875</id>
	<title>Re:Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247683980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That post alone explains the reason of Silverlight and its trojan clone.</p><p>For example, not just Linux users, Symbian users can also view them as well as anything supporting Flash video. Or, they can easily change the container as it is completely documented and watch in their multimedia device.</p><p>Man Flash must be really bugging them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That post alone explains the reason of Silverlight and its trojan clone.For example , not just Linux users , Symbian users can also view them as well as anything supporting Flash video .
Or , they can easily change the container as it is completely documented and watch in their multimedia device.Man Flash must be really bugging them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That post alone explains the reason of Silverlight and its trojan clone.For example, not just Linux users, Symbian users can also view them as well as anything supporting Flash video.
Or, they can easily change the container as it is completely documented and watch in their multimedia device.Man Flash must be really bugging them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709437</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>El Icaro</author>
	<datestamp>1247657460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should try taking that stick out of your ass, though that might leave a hole that could compromise your system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try taking that stick out of your ass , though that might leave a hole that could compromise your system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try taking that stick out of your ass, though that might leave a hole that could compromise your system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247685300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw 4 feynman lectures put online <a href="http://www.vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8" title="vega.org.uk">here</a> [vega.org.uk], he became my hero instantly. He was a great man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw 4 feynman lectures put online here [ vega.org.uk ] , he became my hero instantly .
He was a great man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw 4 feynman lectures put online here [vega.org.uk], he became my hero instantly.
He was a great man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.  The content is only kinda free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because requiring Silverlight ( and therefore Windows ) severely dilutes the notion that Gate 's action is altruistic .
The content is only kinda free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.
The content is only kinda free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705507</id>
	<title>patent 'cows that don't fart' not a joke?</title>
	<author>with a 'c'</author>
	<datestamp>1247682540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With Bill's patent for stopping hurricanes why is a patent for cows that don't fart a joke?
<a href="http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/One\_force\_of\_nature\_vs\_another\_Bill\_Gates\_wants\_to\_stop\_hurricanes\_50385622.html" title="techflash.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/One\_force\_of\_nature\_vs\_another\_Bill\_Gates\_wants\_to\_stop\_hurricanes\_50385622.html</a> [techflash.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>With Bill 's patent for stopping hurricanes why is a patent for cows that do n't fart a joke ?
http : //www.techflash.com/microsoft/One \ _force \ _of \ _nature \ _vs \ _another \ _Bill \ _Gates \ _wants \ _to \ _stop \ _hurricanes \ _50385622.html [ techflash.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Bill's patent for stopping hurricanes why is a patent for cows that don't fart a joke?
http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/One\_force\_of\_nature\_vs\_another\_Bill\_Gates\_wants\_to\_stop\_hurricanes\_50385622.html [techflash.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710155</id>
	<title>Re:This ranting is getting out of hand...</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1247661240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new here.</p><p>Bigoted opinionated ranting has been the life-blood for Slashdot for as long as I can remember.</p><p>It's often what draws people back here, the chance to get righteously worked up about issues non-geeks don't grok.</p><p>The biggest change I've seen over the years is a slight increase in pro-Apple sentiment overall, from the total disdain it attracted when I first started hanging out here. BTW there is an article about the Palm Pre an diTunes, but it was probably posted after your little textual pout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here.Bigoted opinionated ranting has been the life-blood for Slashdot for as long as I can remember.It 's often what draws people back here , the chance to get righteously worked up about issues non-geeks do n't grok.The biggest change I 've seen over the years is a slight increase in pro-Apple sentiment overall , from the total disdain it attracted when I first started hanging out here .
BTW there is an article about the Palm Pre an diTunes , but it was probably posted after your little textual pout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here.Bigoted opinionated ranting has been the life-blood for Slashdot for as long as I can remember.It's often what draws people back here, the chance to get righteously worked up about issues non-geeks don't grok.The biggest change I've seen over the years is a slight increase in pro-Apple sentiment overall, from the total disdain it attracted when I first started hanging out here.
BTW there is an article about the Palm Pre an diTunes, but it was probably posted after your little textual pout.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706217</id>
	<title>Re:Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>rhizome</author>
	<datestamp>1247685660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like Bill couldn't give something to the world without including a self-serving requirement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like Bill could n't give something to the world without including a self-serving requirement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like Bill couldn't give something to the world without including a self-serving requirement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707709</id>
	<title>Please put a torrent up.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have watched it? Why haven't you uploaded a torrent somewhere? Please, I beg you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have watched it ?
Why have n't you uploaded a torrent somewhere ?
Please , I beg you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have watched it?
Why haven't you uploaded a torrent somewhere?
Please, I beg you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706209</id>
	<title>Re:Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1247685600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kinda cool to learn about the dude whose name is on the building I do some work at:<p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard\_Feynman#Commemorations" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard\_Feynman#Commemorations</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>
The main building for the Computing Division at Fermilab, the FCC, is named in his honor: The "Feynman Computing Center".[42]</p><p>Thanks for the links!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda cool to learn about the dude whose name is on the building I do some work at : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard \ _Feynman # Commemorations [ wikipedia.org ] The main building for the Computing Division at Fermilab , the FCC , is named in his honor : The " Feynman Computing Center " .
[ 42 ] Thanks for the links !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda cool to learn about the dude whose name is on the building I do some work at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard\_Feynman#Commemorations [wikipedia.org] 
The main building for the Computing Division at Fermilab, the FCC, is named in his honor: The "Feynman Computing Center".
[42]Thanks for the links!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705663</id>
	<title>won't load in firefox on linux</title>
	<author>Sir\_Real</author>
	<datestamp>1247683200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently my browser is incompatible with the "web app."  One wonders what standards their web is based on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently my browser is incompatible with the " web app .
" One wonders what standards their web is based on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently my browser is incompatible with the "web app.
"  One wonders what standards their web is based on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705583</id>
	<title>Read thinking machines instead</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about some great reading in HTML instead? It tells about where the real IT World was while MS was monkeying with some clone of CP/M</p><p><a href="http://www.longnow.org/views/essays/articles/ArtFeynman.php" title="longnow.org">http://www.longnow.org/views/essays/articles/ArtFeynman.php</a> [longnow.org]</p><p>BTW, dear BillG: There is something called archive.org if you want to donate something to technical community. They offer standard MPEG and OGG files and Flash, which is current de-facto standard can stream them embedded if one is in hurry. Your attempt to kill Flash has failed, fire that team and target something else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about some great reading in HTML instead ?
It tells about where the real IT World was while MS was monkeying with some clone of CP/Mhttp : //www.longnow.org/views/essays/articles/ArtFeynman.php [ longnow.org ] BTW , dear BillG : There is something called archive.org if you want to donate something to technical community .
They offer standard MPEG and OGG files and Flash , which is current de-facto standard can stream them embedded if one is in hurry .
Your attempt to kill Flash has failed , fire that team and target something else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about some great reading in HTML instead?
It tells about where the real IT World was while MS was monkeying with some clone of CP/Mhttp://www.longnow.org/views/essays/articles/ArtFeynman.php [longnow.org]BTW, dear BillG: There is something called archive.org if you want to donate something to technical community.
They offer standard MPEG and OGG files and Flash, which is current de-facto standard can stream them embedded if one is in hurry.
Your attempt to kill Flash has failed, fire that team and target something else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708827</id>
	<title>Also highly recommended</title>
	<author>laing</author>
	<datestamp>1247655000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>20 years or so ago <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/" title="pbs.org">Nova</a> [pbs.org] did an episode called "Last journey of a genius".  That show describes where the "tuva" reference in the microsoft URL comes from.  Feynman had planned a trip there but succumbed to cancer before he made it.
<p>
--
</p><p>
This space for rent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>20 years or so ago Nova [ pbs.org ] did an episode called " Last journey of a genius " .
That show describes where the " tuva " reference in the microsoft URL comes from .
Feynman had planned a trip there but succumbed to cancer before he made it .
-- This space for rent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>20 years or so ago Nova [pbs.org] did an episode called "Last journey of a genius".
That show describes where the "tuva" reference in the microsoft URL comes from.
Feynman had planned a trip there but succumbed to cancer before he made it.
--

This space for rent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705481</id>
	<title>My Gesture To Windows:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FU</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28724999</id>
	<title>Re:Youtube links for non-sliverlighters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247751660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711879</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>Rik Rohl</author>
	<datestamp>1247673000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's also the little problem that the money he has comes from ripping off the entire planet for a decade or more with forced lock-in to crappy, massively overpriced software.</p><p>I not really enamored by him trying to be the great philanthropist and attempting to build some legacy by giving his fortune away. I'd much rather have the money I paid to MS back in my pocket thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's also the little problem that the money he has comes from ripping off the entire planet for a decade or more with forced lock-in to crappy , massively overpriced software.I not really enamored by him trying to be the great philanthropist and attempting to build some legacy by giving his fortune away .
I 'd much rather have the money I paid to MS back in my pocket thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's also the little problem that the money he has comes from ripping off the entire planet for a decade or more with forced lock-in to crappy, massively overpriced software.I not really enamored by him trying to be the great philanthropist and attempting to build some legacy by giving his fortune away.
I'd much rather have the money I paid to MS back in my pocket thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705653</id>
	<title>Clearly you don't play online poker</title>
	<author>Petersko</author>
	<datestamp>1247683140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Here's what I want<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if I flick off my windows pc, it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete. That would allow me to release stress, and save me a few keyboard clicks."</i> <br> <br>

There are many reasons I would (assuming "flip"?) flick off my Windows pc - and MANY reasons why I would flick off my linux PC - for reasons that have nothing to do with an O/S failure. That wouldn't be practical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Here 's what I want ... if I flick off my windows pc , it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete .
That would allow me to release stress , and save me a few keyboard clicks .
" There are many reasons I would ( assuming " flip " ?
) flick off my Windows pc - and MANY reasons why I would flick off my linux PC - for reasons that have nothing to do with an O/S failure .
That would n't be practical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Here's what I want ... if I flick off my windows pc, it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete.
That would allow me to release stress, and save me a few keyboard clicks.
"  

There are many reasons I would (assuming "flip"?
) flick off my Windows pc - and MANY reasons why I would flick off my linux PC - for reasons that have nothing to do with an O/S failure.
That wouldn't be practical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708157</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture in MKV, MPEG4?</title>
	<author>benwaggoner</author>
	<datestamp>1247651700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures, so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application' to make people want to install the plug-in.</p></div><p>It would be lovely to live in a world where historical physics lectures where the killer app to drive installs, but I doubt they'll make a material impact on installed base<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p><p>Silverlight's already on more than a third of internet-connected devices, so it'd take tens of millions of ne installs for any single site to make a significant market share bump .</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures , so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application ' to make people want to install the plug-in.It would be lovely to live in a world where historical physics lectures where the killer app to drive installs , but I doubt they 'll make a material impact on installed base : ) .Silverlight 's already on more than a third of internet-connected devices , so it 'd take tens of millions of ne installs for any single site to make a significant market share bump .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site need Silverlight to view the lectures, so one has to wonder whether Microsoft was looking for a 'killer application' to make people want to install the plug-in.It would be lovely to live in a world where historical physics lectures where the killer app to drive installs, but I doubt they'll make a material impact on installed base :).Silverlight's already on more than a third of internet-connected devices, so it'd take tens of millions of ne installs for any single site to make a significant market share bump .
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705471</id>
	<title>Silverlight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>eat a dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>eat a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eat a dick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706893</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1247688720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Question: Which lectures are they...? I probably already have them in AVI formay and I'm not installing Silverlight just to find out which ones they are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Question : Which lectures are they... ?
I probably already have them in AVI formay and I 'm not installing Silverlight just to find out which ones they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Question: Which lectures are they...?
I probably already have them in AVI formay and I'm not installing Silverlight just to find out which ones they are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706833</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably the most interesting character in physics.  You should read some of his books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the most interesting character in physics .
You should read some of his books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the most interesting character in physics.
You should read some of his books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708223</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it possible that Bill Gates' funds might be entangled with Microsoft and thus he could only release it in a way that also benefits Microsoft due to the various court decisions that require a company to always act in the interests of its shareholders?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it possible that Bill Gates ' funds might be entangled with Microsoft and thus he could only release it in a way that also benefits Microsoft due to the various court decisions that require a company to always act in the interests of its shareholders ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it possible that Bill Gates' funds might be entangled with Microsoft and thus he could only release it in a way that also benefits Microsoft due to the various court decisions that require a company to always act in the interests of its shareholders?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706123</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247685120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The excuse I would need to buy a Mac would be something along the lines of "I have suffered severe brain damage, and therefore need to buy a computer for stupids."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The excuse I would need to buy a Mac would be something along the lines of " I have suffered severe brain damage , and therefore need to buy a computer for stupids .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The excuse I would need to buy a Mac would be something along the lines of "I have suffered severe brain damage, and therefore need to buy a computer for stupids.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706315</id>
	<title>Re:Well I can think of one reason why...</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1247686200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But on the other hand, they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel. Some do, but most don't.</p></div><p>Well I think Bill Gates, when you add up a lot of the things he's done, has donated more than what would be a rounding error.  Still, you can look at all these things in the sense that it's no more generous for Gates to give away a few billion dollars than it is courageous for Superman to jump in front of a bullet.  The hurt isn't large.  It's not as though Gates is going to cease to live an extremely comfortable lifestyle.  What's more, you could argue that something like this is just robbing Peter to pay Paul.  Gates is screwing society out of billions of dollars through underhanded business tactics, only to give back a portion of the money through charitable donations.
</p><p>You can argue those things, but on the other hand, it's not always worth looking a gift horse in the mouth.  He's donating more than he's required to, and doing it of his own free will.  May as well be pleased about that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But on the other hand , they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel .
Some do , but most do n't.Well I think Bill Gates , when you add up a lot of the things he 's done , has donated more than what would be a rounding error .
Still , you can look at all these things in the sense that it 's no more generous for Gates to give away a few billion dollars than it is courageous for Superman to jump in front of a bullet .
The hurt is n't large .
It 's not as though Gates is going to cease to live an extremely comfortable lifestyle .
What 's more , you could argue that something like this is just robbing Peter to pay Paul .
Gates is screwing society out of billions of dollars through underhanded business tactics , only to give back a portion of the money through charitable donations .
You can argue those things , but on the other hand , it 's not always worth looking a gift horse in the mouth .
He 's donating more than he 's required to , and doing it of his own free will .
May as well be pleased about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But on the other hand, they usually do not donate anything close to being something that they would actually feel.
Some do, but most don't.Well I think Bill Gates, when you add up a lot of the things he's done, has donated more than what would be a rounding error.
Still, you can look at all these things in the sense that it's no more generous for Gates to give away a few billion dollars than it is courageous for Superman to jump in front of a bullet.
The hurt isn't large.
It's not as though Gates is going to cease to live an extremely comfortable lifestyle.
What's more, you could argue that something like this is just robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Gates is screwing society out of billions of dollars through underhanded business tactics, only to give back a portion of the money through charitable donations.
You can argue those things, but on the other hand, it's not always worth looking a gift horse in the mouth.
He's donating more than he's required to, and doing it of his own free will.
May as well be pleased about that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709323</id>
	<title>Brilliant</title>
	<author>Miamicoastguard</author>
	<datestamp>1247656980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To anyone complaining that this doesn't load/problems EBCAK.<br>This couldn't have come at a better time. I have read alot of his books and having this available is like icing on the cake. Also @ MrCrassic if you don't have the time to dismiss capitalism for education you are a very sad case. The only reason I took my degree is that it covered the subjects I am passionate about (Physics, Maths, Computer Science, Astronomy) I will make a descision about what job I would like when the time comes, as for now at the speed in which I learn new things and the vastness of occupations and professions unfold rapidly, it is impossible for me to say I want to be x when in 2 months time x may seem an unchallenging and tedious occupation. I study for overkill in all my papers to gain an understanding of the subject rather than a piece of paper needed to bullshit my way into pleasing other people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To anyone complaining that this does n't load/problems EBCAK.This could n't have come at a better time .
I have read alot of his books and having this available is like icing on the cake .
Also @ MrCrassic if you do n't have the time to dismiss capitalism for education you are a very sad case .
The only reason I took my degree is that it covered the subjects I am passionate about ( Physics , Maths , Computer Science , Astronomy ) I will make a descision about what job I would like when the time comes , as for now at the speed in which I learn new things and the vastness of occupations and professions unfold rapidly , it is impossible for me to say I want to be x when in 2 months time x may seem an unchallenging and tedious occupation .
I study for overkill in all my papers to gain an understanding of the subject rather than a piece of paper needed to bullshit my way into pleasing other people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To anyone complaining that this doesn't load/problems EBCAK.This couldn't have come at a better time.
I have read alot of his books and having this available is like icing on the cake.
Also @ MrCrassic if you don't have the time to dismiss capitalism for education you are a very sad case.
The only reason I took my degree is that it covered the subjects I am passionate about (Physics, Maths, Computer Science, Astronomy) I will make a descision about what job I would like when the time comes, as for now at the speed in which I learn new things and the vastness of occupations and professions unfold rapidly, it is impossible for me to say I want to be x when in 2 months time x may seem an unchallenging and tedious occupation.
I study for overkill in all my papers to gain an understanding of the subject rather than a piece of paper needed to bullshit my way into pleasing other people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823</id>
	<title>Trying to keep an open mind...</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1247683800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but this guy still makes me facepalm.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"It just shows the word browser has become a truly meaningless word," Gates said. "What's a browser? What's not a browser? If you're playing a movie, is that a browser or not a browser? If you're doing annotations, is that a browser? If you're editing text, is that a browser or not a browser? In large part, it's more an abuse of terminology than a real change."</p></div><p>Editing text has been part of browsing ever since HTML forms were introduced. Playing movies has been part of browsers since QuickTime and RealPlayer -- so, could easily be 10 years.</p><p>And of course, he's playing dumb about the real difference here. It seems like he's trying to suggest that it shouldn't be called a "browser", but rather, we should be talking about text editors and movie players.</p><p>No, see, the difference is whether I can just watch stuff on YouTube, edit text on Google Docs, pretty much do whatever I want on the Internet, without downloading anything other than a browser update. It means I get a fat client to some very cool services -- one that auto-updates the next time I refresh, yet one that's sufficiently sandboxed as not to be able to touch anything else in my OS.</p><p>It also means that when developing such applications, not only are they automatically cross-platform, but I can develop most of the logic as part of the server, and on the server side, I can use whatever technologies and languages I want.</p><p>And this reality is something Microsoft has been fighting since day 1, with the bastardization of web technology that is IE, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Gates doesn't get it. I guess I gave him the benefit of the doubt...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Ballmer and Gates also stressed the fact that Google now has two operating systems--Chrome OS and Android. Ballmer noted that Microsoft learned with the separate Windows 95 for consumers and Windows NT for businesses that having two operating systems isn't necessarily a positive thing.</p></div><p>*facepalm*</p><p>Ok, leaving aside the fact that you've got, what, five or six versions of Vista, and it looks as though there will be even more versions of Win7 -- just what does Gates think runs on Windows Mobile? It's not Vista, and it's not Win7.</p><p>Sure, Chrome OS and Android are closer to each other than Windows Mobile and Vista, but they're still directed at different markets -- Chrome OS is meant for netbooks, while Android was meant for mobile phones. Android runs on netbooks, but serves an entirely different purpose -- while NT and Win95 look exactly the same -- oh, and as he pointed out, Android has a browser, meaning anything Chrome OS can do, Android can do -- meaning it's more like comparing Vista Starter with Vista Ultimate, whereas NT and Win95 actually had mutually incompatible software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but this guy still makes me facepalm .
" It just shows the word browser has become a truly meaningless word , " Gates said .
" What 's a browser ?
What 's not a browser ?
If you 're playing a movie , is that a browser or not a browser ?
If you 're doing annotations , is that a browser ?
If you 're editing text , is that a browser or not a browser ?
In large part , it 's more an abuse of terminology than a real change .
" Editing text has been part of browsing ever since HTML forms were introduced .
Playing movies has been part of browsers since QuickTime and RealPlayer -- so , could easily be 10 years.And of course , he 's playing dumb about the real difference here .
It seems like he 's trying to suggest that it should n't be called a " browser " , but rather , we should be talking about text editors and movie players.No , see , the difference is whether I can just watch stuff on YouTube , edit text on Google Docs , pretty much do whatever I want on the Internet , without downloading anything other than a browser update .
It means I get a fat client to some very cool services -- one that auto-updates the next time I refresh , yet one that 's sufficiently sandboxed as not to be able to touch anything else in my OS.It also means that when developing such applications , not only are they automatically cross-platform , but I can develop most of the logic as part of the server , and on the server side , I can use whatever technologies and languages I want.And this reality is something Microsoft has been fighting since day 1 , with the bastardization of web technology that is IE , so I suppose I should n't be surprised that Gates does n't get it .
I guess I gave him the benefit of the doubt...Ballmer and Gates also stressed the fact that Google now has two operating systems--Chrome OS and Android .
Ballmer noted that Microsoft learned with the separate Windows 95 for consumers and Windows NT for businesses that having two operating systems is n't necessarily a positive thing .
* facepalm * Ok , leaving aside the fact that you 've got , what , five or six versions of Vista , and it looks as though there will be even more versions of Win7 -- just what does Gates think runs on Windows Mobile ?
It 's not Vista , and it 's not Win7.Sure , Chrome OS and Android are closer to each other than Windows Mobile and Vista , but they 're still directed at different markets -- Chrome OS is meant for netbooks , while Android was meant for mobile phones .
Android runs on netbooks , but serves an entirely different purpose -- while NT and Win95 look exactly the same -- oh , and as he pointed out , Android has a browser , meaning anything Chrome OS can do , Android can do -- meaning it 's more like comparing Vista Starter with Vista Ultimate , whereas NT and Win95 actually had mutually incompatible software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but this guy still makes me facepalm.
"It just shows the word browser has become a truly meaningless word," Gates said.
"What's a browser?
What's not a browser?
If you're playing a movie, is that a browser or not a browser?
If you're doing annotations, is that a browser?
If you're editing text, is that a browser or not a browser?
In large part, it's more an abuse of terminology than a real change.
"Editing text has been part of browsing ever since HTML forms were introduced.
Playing movies has been part of browsers since QuickTime and RealPlayer -- so, could easily be 10 years.And of course, he's playing dumb about the real difference here.
It seems like he's trying to suggest that it shouldn't be called a "browser", but rather, we should be talking about text editors and movie players.No, see, the difference is whether I can just watch stuff on YouTube, edit text on Google Docs, pretty much do whatever I want on the Internet, without downloading anything other than a browser update.
It means I get a fat client to some very cool services -- one that auto-updates the next time I refresh, yet one that's sufficiently sandboxed as not to be able to touch anything else in my OS.It also means that when developing such applications, not only are they automatically cross-platform, but I can develop most of the logic as part of the server, and on the server side, I can use whatever technologies and languages I want.And this reality is something Microsoft has been fighting since day 1, with the bastardization of web technology that is IE, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Gates doesn't get it.
I guess I gave him the benefit of the doubt...Ballmer and Gates also stressed the fact that Google now has two operating systems--Chrome OS and Android.
Ballmer noted that Microsoft learned with the separate Windows 95 for consumers and Windows NT for businesses that having two operating systems isn't necessarily a positive thing.
*facepalm*Ok, leaving aside the fact that you've got, what, five or six versions of Vista, and it looks as though there will be even more versions of Win7 -- just what does Gates think runs on Windows Mobile?
It's not Vista, and it's not Win7.Sure, Chrome OS and Android are closer to each other than Windows Mobile and Vista, but they're still directed at different markets -- Chrome OS is meant for netbooks, while Android was meant for mobile phones.
Android runs on netbooks, but serves an entirely different purpose -- while NT and Win95 look exactly the same -- oh, and as he pointed out, Android has a browser, meaning anything Chrome OS can do, Android can do -- meaning it's more like comparing Vista Starter with Vista Ultimate, whereas NT and Win95 actually had mutually incompatible software.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707073</id>
	<title>Re:Trying to keep an open mind...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247689560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the most asinine comment I've seen in a while. The reason you can "just watch stuff on YouTube" is because you have installed a plug-in from Adobe (or a clone) that lets you run flash applications. Silverlight is a plugin from Microsoft that lets you run silverlight applications. Saying that one is ok and the other is bogus just shows your bias.</p><p>BTW, Silverlight works on Mac and Firefox, plus the open source Moonlight works on Linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the most asinine comment I 've seen in a while .
The reason you can " just watch stuff on YouTube " is because you have installed a plug-in from Adobe ( or a clone ) that lets you run flash applications .
Silverlight is a plugin from Microsoft that lets you run silverlight applications .
Saying that one is ok and the other is bogus just shows your bias.BTW , Silverlight works on Mac and Firefox , plus the open source Moonlight works on Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the most asinine comment I've seen in a while.
The reason you can "just watch stuff on YouTube" is because you have installed a plug-in from Adobe (or a clone) that lets you run flash applications.
Silverlight is a plugin from Microsoft that lets you run silverlight applications.
Saying that one is ok and the other is bogus just shows your bias.BTW, Silverlight works on Mac and Firefox, plus the open source Moonlight works on Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707119</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247689800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight? Is it because it doesn't have full Linux support yet?</p></div><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>maybe because of years of Microsoft taking anything gathering momentum and spinning a version tied up and into Windows and many times illegally and many times using strong arm tactics. Did you read how they flooded the International Standards Organization with Microsoft business partners to stuff the ballots so MS OOXML was accepted? They even offered to pay the admission fees and handed them speaking points. There's huge list of these things and little has to do with providing the best solution and most is about anchoring a product and therefore the customers to Windows. Silverlight is just another anchor tied to Windows and it does not matter if they have a version for the Mac, that'll only last long enough to help kill Adobe Flash. yes, that is their motivation just as IE was nothing more than to kill Navigator, MS Visual J++ to kill Java, MS DirectX to kill OpenGL, etc, etc, etc. And yes, their primary business model is to lock people into their platform. So unless you like the MS logo tatooed on your forehead, you stay away from them as a fight for choice. As funny as that sounds.<br>
&nbsp; </p><p>Microsoft has not shown a single instance where it has changed over the years so screw MS Silverlight, screw MS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET, and anything else they produce.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight ?
Is it because it does n't have full Linux support yet ?
  maybe because of years of Microsoft taking anything gathering momentum and spinning a version tied up and into Windows and many times illegally and many times using strong arm tactics .
Did you read how they flooded the International Standards Organization with Microsoft business partners to stuff the ballots so MS OOXML was accepted ?
They even offered to pay the admission fees and handed them speaking points .
There 's huge list of these things and little has to do with providing the best solution and most is about anchoring a product and therefore the customers to Windows .
Silverlight is just another anchor tied to Windows and it does not matter if they have a version for the Mac , that 'll only last long enough to help kill Adobe Flash .
yes , that is their motivation just as IE was nothing more than to kill Navigator , MS Visual J + + to kill Java , MS DirectX to kill OpenGL , etc , etc , etc .
And yes , their primary business model is to lock people into their platform .
So unless you like the MS logo tatooed on your forehead , you stay away from them as a fight for choice .
As funny as that sounds .
  Microsoft has not shown a single instance where it has changed over the years so screw MS Silverlight , screw MS .NET , and anything else they produce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?
Is it because it doesn't have full Linux support yet?
  maybe because of years of Microsoft taking anything gathering momentum and spinning a version tied up and into Windows and many times illegally and many times using strong arm tactics.
Did you read how they flooded the International Standards Organization with Microsoft business partners to stuff the ballots so MS OOXML was accepted?
They even offered to pay the admission fees and handed them speaking points.
There's huge list of these things and little has to do with providing the best solution and most is about anchoring a product and therefore the customers to Windows.
Silverlight is just another anchor tied to Windows and it does not matter if they have a version for the Mac, that'll only last long enough to help kill Adobe Flash.
yes, that is their motivation just as IE was nothing more than to kill Navigator, MS Visual J++ to kill Java, MS DirectX to kill OpenGL, etc, etc, etc.
And yes, their primary business model is to lock people into their platform.
So unless you like the MS logo tatooed on your forehead, you stay away from them as a fight for choice.
As funny as that sounds.
  Microsoft has not shown a single instance where it has changed over the years so screw MS Silverlight, screw MS .NET, and anything else they produce.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706427</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247686740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, looks like Microsoft shills with mod points lack a sense of humor... But that's understandable, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , looks like Microsoft shills with mod points lack a sense of humor... But that 's understandable , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, looks like Microsoft shills with mod points lack a sense of humor... But that's understandable, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706613</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>harlows\_monkeys</author>
	<datestamp>1247687580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic. The content is only kinda free</p></div><p>Silverlight does not require Windows. It is available for Mac, also, where it runs flawlessly. Windows + Mac covers around 99\% of personal computers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because requiring Silverlight ( and therefore Windows ) severely dilutes the notion that Gate 's action is altruistic .
The content is only kinda freeSilverlight does not require Windows .
It is available for Mac , also , where it runs flawlessly .
Windows + Mac covers around 99 \ % of personal computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.
The content is only kinda freeSilverlight does not require Windows.
It is available for Mac, also, where it runs flawlessly.
Windows + Mac covers around 99\% of personal computers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709641</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>Carra</author>
	<datestamp>1247658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just installed Silverlight and watched the first lecture. Very interesting and I had a couple of laughs. The quality of the movies is pretty good too. And best of all, it's free.

I'll enjoy the rest of the lectures and let all the linux fanboys dish Silverlight in this thread.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just installed Silverlight and watched the first lecture .
Very interesting and I had a couple of laughs .
The quality of the movies is pretty good too .
And best of all , it 's free .
I 'll enjoy the rest of the lectures and let all the linux fanboys dish Silverlight in this thread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just installed Silverlight and watched the first lecture.
Very interesting and I had a couple of laughs.
The quality of the movies is pretty good too.
And best of all, it's free.
I'll enjoy the rest of the lectures and let all the linux fanboys dish Silverlight in this thread.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331</id>
	<title>gesture recognition</title>
	<author>neonprimetime</author>
	<datestamp>1247681940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Microsoft doesn't just want to bring gesture recognition to the Xbox with Project Natal. It also wants the technology in Windows, according to a very good source--Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates. </i>
<br> <br>
Here's what I want<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if I flick off my windows pc, it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete.  That would allow me to release stress, and save me a few keyboard clicks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft does n't just want to bring gesture recognition to the Xbox with Project Natal .
It also wants the technology in Windows , according to a very good source--Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates .
Here 's what I want ... if I flick off my windows pc , it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete .
That would allow me to release stress , and save me a few keyboard clicks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft doesn't just want to bring gesture recognition to the Xbox with Project Natal.
It also wants the technology in Windows, according to a very good source--Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.
Here's what I want ... if I flick off my windows pc, it will automatically hit ctrl-alt-delete.
That would allow me to release stress, and save me a few keyboard clicks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712653</id>
	<title>Re:Why the knee-jerk reactions to Silverlight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>funny to read this from a ubuntu machine that I've just had to reboot after a kernel update.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>funny to read this from a ubuntu machine that I 've just had to reboot after a kernel update .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>funny to read this from a ubuntu machine that I've just had to reboot after a kernel update.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707267</id>
	<title>This site needs Silverlight</title>
	<author>benwaggoner</author>
	<datestamp>1247690580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't care that it's MS Research. The irritating part is that my "browser is not compatible" because I don't use silverlight.</p></div><p>What browser do you use?</p><p>Also, if you look at the design of the video experience, it really couldn't be done without Silverlight. This isn't just a simple video player, but with integrated captions, commentary, graphical links, and delivered via Smooth Streaming.</p><p>It's really a media player app using Silverlight as the runtime; there's certainly many thousands lines of source for the managed code driving that experience.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care that it 's MS Research .
The irritating part is that my " browser is not compatible " because I do n't use silverlight.What browser do you use ? Also , if you look at the design of the video experience , it really could n't be done without Silverlight .
This is n't just a simple video player , but with integrated captions , commentary , graphical links , and delivered via Smooth Streaming.It 's really a media player app using Silverlight as the runtime ; there 's certainly many thousands lines of source for the managed code driving that experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care that it's MS Research.
The irritating part is that my "browser is not compatible" because I don't use silverlight.What browser do you use?Also, if you look at the design of the video experience, it really couldn't be done without Silverlight.
This isn't just a simple video player, but with integrated captions, commentary, graphical links, and delivered via Smooth Streaming.It's really a media player app using Silverlight as the runtime; there's certainly many thousands lines of source for the managed code driving that experience.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28716481</id>
	<title>Use Vega Science Trust site, avoid silverlight</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1247758140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get the lectures here:</p><p><a href="http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8" title="vega.org.uk">http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8</a> [vega.org.uk]</p><p>And avoid the silverlight embrace, extend, extinguish, scam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get the lectures here : http : //vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 [ vega.org.uk ] And avoid the silverlight embrace , extend , extinguish , scam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get the lectures here:http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 [vega.org.uk]And avoid the silverlight embrace, extend, extinguish, scam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707461</id>
	<title>ALREADY ONLINE FOR FREE</title>
	<author>Cowmonaut</author>
	<datestamp>1247691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8" title="vega.org.uk">http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8</a> [vega.org.uk]

Requires QuickTime or RealPlayer I think, I don't remember which.  But they're already online for free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 [ vega.org.uk ] Requires QuickTime or RealPlayer I think , I do n't remember which .
But they 're already online for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8 [vega.org.uk]

Requires QuickTime or RealPlayer I think, I don't remember which.
But they're already online for free.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706743</id>
	<title>Re:ALERT: Silverlight Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247688060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you think he would have picked a subject/person with wider appeal if that were entirely the case?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you think he would have picked a subject/person with wider appeal if that were entirely the case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you think he would have picked a subject/person with wider appeal if that were entirely the case?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706043</id>
	<title>Fenyman Lectures at the University of Auckland</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are very interesting: http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8</p><p>They're what I thought this slashdot article was about when I read the headline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are very interesting : http : //vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8They 're what I thought this slashdot article was about when I read the headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are very interesting: http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8They're what I thought this slashdot article was about when I read the headline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</id>
	<title>Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247682720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Click here to download. Needs no restart".</p><p>The Goddamned site requires suilverlight. Now why would lectures need silverlight? Damn it, I just want to read the paper, not play some goofy game.</p><p>I see why Gates put these on the net, he wants more Silverlight penetration. Evil bastard will rot in hell when he dies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Click here to download .
Needs no restart " .The Goddamned site requires suilverlight .
Now why would lectures need silverlight ?
Damn it , I just want to read the paper , not play some goofy game.I see why Gates put these on the net , he wants more Silverlight penetration .
Evil bastard will rot in hell when he dies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Click here to download.
Needs no restart".The Goddamned site requires suilverlight.
Now why would lectures need silverlight?
Damn it, I just want to read the paper, not play some goofy game.I see why Gates put these on the net, he wants more Silverlight penetration.
Evil bastard will rot in hell when he dies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706169</id>
	<title>Re:Only skimmed it, but...</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1247685420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.</p></div><p>I don't think many people believe that Gates is stupid and merely got lucky.  The criticism more likely to be leveled at him is that he got where he is more through business acumen than through producing high-quality products.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I do have to say that Gates does n't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.I do n't think many people believe that Gates is stupid and merely got lucky .
The criticism more likely to be leveled at him is that he got where he is more through business acumen than through producing high-quality products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I do have to say that Gates doesn't usually appear to be a stupid little upstart that got lucky or something like that.I don't think many people believe that Gates is stupid and merely got lucky.
The criticism more likely to be leveled at him is that he got where he is more through business acumen than through producing high-quality products.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28716785</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247759220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's the first video I've watched with silverlight and it was so unbearably choppy I stopped it and tried to find the media in a more amicable format...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's the first video I 've watched with silverlight and it was so unbearably choppy I stopped it and tried to find the media in a more amicable format.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's the first video I've watched with silverlight and it was so unbearably choppy I stopped it and tried to find the media in a more amicable format...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707591</id>
	<title>License of the videos? Is free really free...</title>
	<author>ciantic</author>
	<datestamp>1247648760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reading about the interview of Bill Gates, made me wonder, does he truly truly want the videos to be free and available to everybody?<br>
<br>
What are the licenses of the videos?<br>
<br>
I suspect I couldn't copy them elsewhere, for free. According to article, "Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it <b>broadly available</b> for free." [emphasis mine] yes, broadly available, but locked to single distributor. This does limit the free a lot! I wonder was this the intention of then relatively naive 30-year-old Bill Gates too, I suspect not. Article gave me impression that Gates truly (once) wanted them to be free.<br>
<br>
I'm having hard time with Tuva myself, mainly because I cannot watch them by streaming without interruptions. And I couldn't pick them with me and show them to someone not connected to Tuva. <br>
<br>
If the purpose of this stunt is to share the knowledge, then please, make them available as download also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading about the interview of Bill Gates , made me wonder , does he truly truly want the videos to be free and available to everybody ?
What are the licenses of the videos ?
I suspect I could n't copy them elsewhere , for free .
According to article , " Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it broadly available for free .
" [ emphasis mine ] yes , broadly available , but locked to single distributor .
This does limit the free a lot !
I wonder was this the intention of then relatively naive 30-year-old Bill Gates too , I suspect not .
Article gave me impression that Gates truly ( once ) wanted them to be free .
I 'm having hard time with Tuva myself , mainly because I can not watch them by streaming without interruptions .
And I could n't pick them with me and show them to someone not connected to Tuva .
If the purpose of this stunt is to share the knowledge , then please , make them available as download also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading about the interview of Bill Gates, made me wonder, does he truly truly want the videos to be free and available to everybody?
What are the licenses of the videos?
I suspect I couldn't copy them elsewhere, for free.
According to article, "Gates said that he hoped his action would serve as a model for taking great educational content and making it broadly available for free.
" [emphasis mine] yes, broadly available, but locked to single distributor.
This does limit the free a lot!
I wonder was this the intention of then relatively naive 30-year-old Bill Gates too, I suspect not.
Article gave me impression that Gates truly (once) wanted them to be free.
I'm having hard time with Tuva myself, mainly because I cannot watch them by streaming without interruptions.
And I couldn't pick them with me and show them to someone not connected to Tuva.
If the purpose of this stunt is to share the knowledge, then please, make them available as download also.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710337</id>
	<title>Re:Education begins where vocational focus ends.</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1247662140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So many people see school solely as a "means to an end," and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this. When one's goal is simply to graduate, there's "no time" to bother with learning the extra stuff; it's all about the grade in that paradigm.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Wait, what? I know for some subjects it's possible to game the system and score well for a minimum of learning. If tests and assignments are well designed, you need to learn a lot of extra stuff. At least that was true at my uni.
</p><blockquote><div><p>I don't want to make this longer than it already is, but what I think would be awesome is to let students "create a major" at the college level.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Depending where you study this is a possibility. My university had BEng and BSc degrees in Computing. The BEng ones had 90\% of the subjects set for you like you describe. The Computer Science degree had maybe 20\% of the courses set and these were mostly introductory 1st and 2nd year subjects in math and computing. The only other requirement was that a certain \% of your electives had to be computing subjects. If I'd wanted to narrow down to a "major" I could have. Instead, I decided to go for a wide range of computing and arts subjects, everything from graphics to AI to databases on the computing side and German and philosophy for the arts electives.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So many people see school solely as a " means to an end , " and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this .
When one 's goal is simply to graduate , there 's " no time " to bother with learning the extra stuff ; it 's all about the grade in that paradigm .
Wait , what ?
I know for some subjects it 's possible to game the system and score well for a minimum of learning .
If tests and assignments are well designed , you need to learn a lot of extra stuff .
At least that was true at my uni .
I do n't want to make this longer than it already is , but what I think would be awesome is to let students " create a major " at the college level .
Depending where you study this is a possibility .
My university had BEng and BSc degrees in Computing .
The BEng ones had 90 \ % of the subjects set for you like you describe .
The Computer Science degree had maybe 20 \ % of the courses set and these were mostly introductory 1st and 2nd year subjects in math and computing .
The only other requirement was that a certain \ % of your electives had to be computing subjects .
If I 'd wanted to narrow down to a " major " I could have .
Instead , I decided to go for a wide range of computing and arts subjects , everything from graphics to AI to databases on the computing side and German and philosophy for the arts electives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So many people see school solely as a "means to an end," and many schools set themselves up to be precisely this.
When one's goal is simply to graduate, there's "no time" to bother with learning the extra stuff; it's all about the grade in that paradigm.
Wait, what?
I know for some subjects it's possible to game the system and score well for a minimum of learning.
If tests and assignments are well designed, you need to learn a lot of extra stuff.
At least that was true at my uni.
I don't want to make this longer than it already is, but what I think would be awesome is to let students "create a major" at the college level.
Depending where you study this is a possibility.
My university had BEng and BSc degrees in Computing.
The BEng ones had 90\% of the subjects set for you like you describe.
The Computer Science degree had maybe 20\% of the courses set and these were mostly introductory 1st and 2nd year subjects in math and computing.
The only other requirement was that a certain \% of your electives had to be computing subjects.
If I'd wanted to narrow down to a "major" I could have.
Instead, I decided to go for a wide range of computing and arts subjects, everything from graphics to AI to databases on the computing side and German and philosophy for the arts electives.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707451</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1247691360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why the knee-jerk reactions to <b>Sucking satans cock!</b>?</p></div></blockquote><p>There. Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Sucking satans cock ! ? There .
Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the knee-jerk reactions to Sucking satans cock!?There.
Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706173</id>
	<title>It's on YouTube</title>
	<author>Latinhypercube</author>
	<datestamp>1247685480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JweukBwZ10" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow"> 1964 Messenger Lecture 1 Character of Physical Law 1 of 7 </a> [youtube.com]

I have been loving discovering Feynman. As much as he reveals and explains interesting physics, he also maps the limits of our current understanding. Questions like, how does gravity and matter work, why does light refract, simple aspects of physics that we still don't understand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here : - 1964 Messenger Lecture 1 Character of Physical Law 1 of 7 [ youtube.com ] I have been loving discovering Feynman .
As much as he reveals and explains interesting physics , he also maps the limits of our current understanding .
Questions like , how does gravity and matter work , why does light refract , simple aspects of physics that we still do n't understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here :-  1964 Messenger Lecture 1 Character of Physical Law 1 of 7  [youtube.com]

I have been loving discovering Feynman.
As much as he reveals and explains interesting physics, he also maps the limits of our current understanding.
Questions like, how does gravity and matter work, why does light refract, simple aspects of physics that we still don't understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705881</id>
	<title>Re:I know why.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.  The content is only kinda free.</p></div><p>Wrong. Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.</p><p>Silverlight for Mac-&gt; <a href="http://silverlight.dlservice.microsoft.com/download/9/5/E/95E973B3-17C1-459B-AA1B-20827B867D15/Silverlight.dmg" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">download</a> [microsoft.com]</p><p>And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions instead<br>Mono-&gt; <a href="http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight" title="mono-project.com" rel="nofollow">download</a> [mono-project.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because requiring Silverlight ( and therefore Windows ) severely dilutes the notion that Gate 's action is altruistic .
The content is only kinda free.Wrong .
Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.Silverlight for Mac- &gt; download [ microsoft.com ] And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions insteadMono- &gt; download [ mono-project.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because requiring Silverlight (and therefore Windows) severely dilutes the notion that Gate's action is altruistic.
The content is only kinda free.Wrong.
Choose to use it or not as you wish but dont spread incorrect information.Silverlight for Mac-&gt; download [microsoft.com]And of course you can choose the Mono implementation if you want FOSS versions insteadMono-&gt; download [mono-project.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28713871</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1247736360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I went to Adobe's site to watch a video and those cocksuckers require Flash.  I can see why Adobe puts their videos on the net -- it's because they want more Flash penetration.  I hope Adobe rots in hell when they all die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I went to Adobe 's site to watch a video and those cocksuckers require Flash .
I can see why Adobe puts their videos on the net -- it 's because they want more Flash penetration .
I hope Adobe rots in hell when they all die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I went to Adobe's site to watch a video and those cocksuckers require Flash.
I can see why Adobe puts their videos on the net -- it's because they want more Flash penetration.
I hope Adobe rots in hell when they all die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708899</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror, please?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>haha jokes on you, there is no hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>haha jokes on you , there is no hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haha jokes on you, there is no hell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709367</id>
	<title>Re:gesture recognition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247657160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...ooor you're just tired of dealing with bullshit on windows and linux</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...ooor you 're just tired of dealing with bullshit on windows and linux</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...ooor you're just tired of dealing with bullshit on windows and linux</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706123</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28802391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28724999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28713871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28716785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1635245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707663
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707267
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28713871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708223
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705593
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706123
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707647
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706609
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707451
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706665
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705731
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707443
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711253
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709437
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706893
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706303
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707119
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705761
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705881
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707297
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706613
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706763
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712277
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28716785
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706151
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706833
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708827
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706827
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28712653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28711879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706315
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28714001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28724999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28708557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28802391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28710155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707073
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28705663
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28706659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707915
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28709687
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1635245.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1635245.28707591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
