<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_13_1811256</id>
	<title>Hackers' Next Target &mdash; Your Brain?</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1247473620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Wired reports  that as neural devices become more complicated &mdash; and go wireless &mdash; some scientists say the <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/07/neurosecurity/">risks of 'brain hacking' should be taken seriously</a>. '"Neural devices are innovating at an extremely rapid rate and hold tremendous promise for the future," said computer security expert Tadayoshi Kohno of the University of Washington. "But if we don't start paying attention to security, we're worried that we might find ourselves in five or 10 years saying we've made a big mistake."' For example, the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/health/research/11arm.html">include wireless controls</a> that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine. If neural engineers don't build in security features such as encryption and access control, an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb."</i>  Relatedly, several users have written to tell us that science may be <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/molecules\_constant\_efforts\_keep\_our\_memories\_intact.php">closer to the science fiction "mind wipe"</a> than previously thought.  Put this all together and I welcome the next step in social networking; letting the cloud drive my limbs around town via a live webcam and then wiping the memory from my brain.  Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Wired reports that as neural devices become more complicated    and go wireless    some scientists say the risks of 'brain hacking ' should be taken seriously .
' " Neural devices are innovating at an extremely rapid rate and hold tremendous promise for the future , " said computer security expert Tadayoshi Kohno of the University of Washington .
" But if we do n't start paying attention to security , we 're worried that we might find ourselves in five or 10 years saying we 've made a big mistake .
" ' For example , the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely include wireless controls that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine .
If neural engineers do n't build in security features such as encryption and access control , an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb .
" Relatedly , several users have written to tell us that science may be closer to the science fiction " mind wipe " than previously thought .
Put this all together and I welcome the next step in social networking ; letting the cloud drive my limbs around town via a live webcam and then wiping the memory from my brain .
Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Wired reports  that as neural devices become more complicated — and go wireless — some scientists say the risks of 'brain hacking' should be taken seriously.
'"Neural devices are innovating at an extremely rapid rate and hold tremendous promise for the future," said computer security expert Tadayoshi Kohno of the University of Washington.
"But if we don't start paying attention to security, we're worried that we might find ourselves in five or 10 years saying we've made a big mistake.
"' For example, the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely include wireless controls that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine.
If neural engineers don't build in security features such as encryption and access control, an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb.
"  Relatedly, several users have written to tell us that science may be closer to the science fiction "mind wipe" than previously thought.
Put this all together and I welcome the next step in social networking; letting the cloud drive my limbs around town via a live webcam and then wiping the memory from my brain.
Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690093</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1247582100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, yeah, I feel totally degraded when I spend my hard-earned dollars at Wal-Mart.</p><p>Wait, no I don't. Not sure what your problem is...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , yeah , I feel totally degraded when I spend my hard-earned dollars at Wal-Mart.Wait , no I do n't .
Not sure what your problem is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, yeah, I feel totally degraded when I spend my hard-earned dollars at Wal-Mart.Wait, no I don't.
Not sure what your problem is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683093</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247481480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm thinking about volunteering as a honeypot brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking about volunteering as a honeypot brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking about volunteering as a honeypot brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682535</id>
	<title>I can't wait ...</title>
	<author>Sepiraph</author>
	<datestamp>1247479200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always wanted to do some "ghost-hacking" and "stealing someone's eyes" like they did in Ghost in the Shell SAC!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wanted to do some " ghost-hacking " and " stealing someone 's eyes " like they did in Ghost in the Shell SAC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wanted to do some "ghost-hacking" and "stealing someone's eyes" like they did in Ghost in the Shell SAC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682789</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247480280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, this IS Walmart you're talking about.  Still, your observations made me think of that story with the monkeys in a cage (not sure if this was ever done, but it makes a good thought experiment).  There is a banana hanging from the ceiling and a ladder lying on the ground of this cage, and a group of monkeys is placed into it.  If a monkey tries to use the ladder to get the banana, these researchers hose them all down with cold water.  Monkeys are rotated in and out of the cage; every few days, some go in and some come out.  After a few rotations, when a new monkey tries to get the banana with the ladder, the other ones all rush to stop it.  The researchers don't even need to break out the hose anymore; social engineering has taken effect, and none of the monkeys in the cage have even seen the hose or know why they're stopping the new guy from getting the banana.</p><p>You should consider yourself lucky that the consumer-drones didn't all swarm on you and force you into line with the rest of them.  I'd guess that the amount of social engineering involved with the receipt check might just cause that behavior in some people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , this IS Walmart you 're talking about .
Still , your observations made me think of that story with the monkeys in a cage ( not sure if this was ever done , but it makes a good thought experiment ) .
There is a banana hanging from the ceiling and a ladder lying on the ground of this cage , and a group of monkeys is placed into it .
If a monkey tries to use the ladder to get the banana , these researchers hose them all down with cold water .
Monkeys are rotated in and out of the cage ; every few days , some go in and some come out .
After a few rotations , when a new monkey tries to get the banana with the ladder , the other ones all rush to stop it .
The researchers do n't even need to break out the hose anymore ; social engineering has taken effect , and none of the monkeys in the cage have even seen the hose or know why they 're stopping the new guy from getting the banana.You should consider yourself lucky that the consumer-drones did n't all swarm on you and force you into line with the rest of them .
I 'd guess that the amount of social engineering involved with the receipt check might just cause that behavior in some people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, this IS Walmart you're talking about.
Still, your observations made me think of that story with the monkeys in a cage (not sure if this was ever done, but it makes a good thought experiment).
There is a banana hanging from the ceiling and a ladder lying on the ground of this cage, and a group of monkeys is placed into it.
If a monkey tries to use the ladder to get the banana, these researchers hose them all down with cold water.
Monkeys are rotated in and out of the cage; every few days, some go in and some come out.
After a few rotations, when a new monkey tries to get the banana with the ladder, the other ones all rush to stop it.
The researchers don't even need to break out the hose anymore; social engineering has taken effect, and none of the monkeys in the cage have even seen the hose or know why they're stopping the new guy from getting the banana.You should consider yourself lucky that the consumer-drones didn't all swarm on you and force you into line with the rest of them.
I'd guess that the amount of social engineering involved with the receipt check might just cause that behavior in some people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688121</id>
	<title>symantec pulls a new threat from their white-hats?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247566980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call bullshit; is this some new scare tactic from white-hats and the "security" software industry?</p><p>whats next? threat levels on symantec's site as relating to your brain?</p><p>great just what we needed, more fear mongering!</p><p>also "hackers next target" ? id say, if anything, "police/government next target"...</p><p>fear mongering articles earn no respect</p><p>http://www.twilightcampaign.net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bullshit ; is this some new scare tactic from white-hats and the " security " software industry ? whats next ?
threat levels on symantec 's site as relating to your brain ? great just what we needed , more fear mongering ! also " hackers next target " ?
id say , if anything , " police/government next target " ...fear mongering articles earn no respecthttp : //www.twilightcampaign.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bullshit; is this some new scare tactic from white-hats and the "security" software industry?whats next?
threat levels on symantec's site as relating to your brain?great just what we needed, more fear mongering!also "hackers next target" ?
id say, if anything, "police/government next target"...fear mongering articles earn no respecthttp://www.twilightcampaign.net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686925</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1247509380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hacking an IP oven or Coffee maker can have a use. If it gets you onto a network you want to sniff internal traffic on, that's good. If it gets you a way to attack more critical systems, that's even better. Networked printers are used for this sort of thing rather commonly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking an IP oven or Coffee maker can have a use .
If it gets you onto a network you want to sniff internal traffic on , that 's good .
If it gets you a way to attack more critical systems , that 's even better .
Networked printers are used for this sort of thing rather commonly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking an IP oven or Coffee maker can have a use.
If it gets you onto a network you want to sniff internal traffic on, that's good.
If it gets you a way to attack more critical systems, that's even better.
Networked printers are used for this sort of thing rather commonly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683309</id>
	<title>See "Interface" by Neal Stephenson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247482560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Along the lines of an eerily plausible story:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface\_(novel)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>If you've not read it yet, do so.  And remember to vote Cozzano!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Along the lines of an eerily plausible story :           http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface \ _ ( novel ) [ wikipedia.org ] If you 've not read it yet , do so .
And remember to vote Cozzano !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Along the lines of an eerily plausible story:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface\_(novel) [wikipedia.org]If you've not read it yet, do so.
And remember to vote Cozzano!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682773</id>
	<title>Hacking your brain is called hypnosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247480220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and has been known for hundreds of years</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and has been known for hundreds of years</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and has been known for hundreds of years</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</id>
	<title>Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh come on, am I the first pathetic anime geek to mention Ghost in the Shell?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , am I the first pathetic anime geek to mention Ghost in the Shell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, am I the first pathetic anime geek to mention Ghost in the Shell?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689861</id>
	<title>Re:Ultimate slaves?</title>
	<author>A Pancake</author>
	<datestamp>1247581020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would that really be a problem? Presuming they do the logical thing and cause obeying them to trigger the pleasure centers of the brain you would genuinely enjoy it. For a lot of people, that would be a step up from where they are today.</p><p>I'm not saying I'd volunteer, but to some that might be an acceptable option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would that really be a problem ?
Presuming they do the logical thing and cause obeying them to trigger the pleasure centers of the brain you would genuinely enjoy it .
For a lot of people , that would be a step up from where they are today.I 'm not saying I 'd volunteer , but to some that might be an acceptable option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would that really be a problem?
Presuming they do the logical thing and cause obeying them to trigger the pleasure centers of the brain you would genuinely enjoy it.
For a lot of people, that would be a step up from where they are today.I'm not saying I'd volunteer, but to some that might be an acceptable option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682499</id>
	<title>Re:OK, tell the truth</title>
	<author>SputnikPanic</author>
	<datestamp>1247479080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually thought of that scene in Evil Dead 2 where Bruce Campbell's possessed hand starts beating him senseless...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually thought of that scene in Evil Dead 2 where Bruce Campbell 's possessed hand starts beating him senseless.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually thought of that scene in Evil Dead 2 where Bruce Campbell's possessed hand starts beating him senseless...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687189</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>parann0yed</author>
	<datestamp>1247513460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yeah, and don't forget about those who religiously tune in to Fox News (Oreilly) or whatever your preferred so called news channel is.  Heck, I still come to slashdot every now and then and even read/reply to posts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , and do n't forget about those who religiously tune in to Fox News ( Oreilly ) or whatever your preferred so called news channel is .
Heck , I still come to slashdot every now and then and even read/reply to posts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, and don't forget about those who religiously tune in to Fox News (Oreilly) or whatever your preferred so called news channel is.
Heck, I still come to slashdot every now and then and even read/reply to posts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683745</id>
	<title>Brain based hacking possible ??</title>
	<author>gedw99</author>
	<datestamp>1247485080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hacking your brain remotely is also a possibility.

See this interview with a further "Stargate" member,
that remotely viewed various locations using brain power.

<a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/monkeyclaus/videos/1/" title="viddler.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.viddler.com/explore/monkeyclaus/videos/1/</a> [viddler.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking your brain remotely is also a possibility .
See this interview with a further " Stargate " member , that remotely viewed various locations using brain power .
http : //www.viddler.com/explore/monkeyclaus/videos/1/ [ viddler.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking your brain remotely is also a possibility.
See this interview with a further "Stargate" member,
that remotely viewed various locations using brain power.
http://www.viddler.com/explore/monkeyclaus/videos/1/ [viddler.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686969</id>
	<title>The Laughing Man Incident</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1247510040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I thought what I 'd do was , I 'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682439</id>
	<title>The CIA has had this tech for years</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1247478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've found through extensive research that a bullet to the back of the head affects a very thorough mind wipe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've found through extensive research that a bullet to the back of the head affects a very thorough mind wipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've found through extensive research that a bullet to the back of the head affects a very thorough mind wipe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28694057</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Bender0x7D1</author>
	<datestamp>1247598840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</i> </p><p>Life insurance?  Just make the leg fail when they need to apply the brakes in a car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ?
Life insurance ?
Just make the leg fail when they need to apply the brakes in a car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?
Life insurance?
Just make the leg fail when they need to apply the brakes in a car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684555</id>
	<title>I thought what I'd do was</title>
	<author>marm</author>
	<datestamp>1247489760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.  Ho ho ho.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes .
Ho ho ho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
Ho ho ho.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682823</id>
	<title>Re:OK, tell the truth</title>
	<author>Vader82</author>
	<datestamp>1247480460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was thinking of something a little more "Being John Malkovitch" personally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking of something a little more " Being John Malkovitch " personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking of something a little more "Being John Malkovitch" personally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684293</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247488260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"... you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot."</p><p>hey, I already have that on my cron job:</p><p>0 20 * * 5-6<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sbin/drink\_beer.sh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ... you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot .
" hey , I already have that on my cron job : 0 20 * * 5-6 /sbin/drink \ _beer.sh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"... you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.
"hey, I already have that on my cron job:0 20 * * 5-6 /sbin/drink\_beer.sh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>SirLurksAlot</author>
	<datestamp>1247480040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget that, I'm going to copy my brain and run it in a VM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget that , I 'm going to copy my brain and run it in a VM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget that, I'm going to copy my brain and run it in a VM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682251</id>
	<title>Raise your hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if you tried to register mylimb.com?</htmltext>
<tokenext>if you tried to register mylimb.com ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you tried to register mylimb.com?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684735</id>
	<title>obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247491200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Insert "Snow Crash" and "Feed" novel references here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Insert " Snow Crash " and " Feed " novel references here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Insert "Snow Crash" and "Feed" novel references here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689211</id>
	<title>Unreal Torunament 2090 the abridged series</title>
	<author>Sj0</author>
	<datestamp>1247578260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've beaten you at a children's video game. Now you will pay!</p><p>MIND CRUSH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've beaten you at a children 's video game .
Now you will pay ! MIND CRUSH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've beaten you at a children's video game.
Now you will pay!MIND CRUSH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683773</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1247485320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everybody else thought the reference was too obvious, and didn't want to be the dork thinking he was being all clever by posting it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody else thought the reference was too obvious , and did n't want to be the dork thinking he was being all clever by posting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody else thought the reference was too obvious, and didn't want to be the dork thinking he was being all clever by posting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684821</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>BlueCollarCamel</author>
	<datestamp>1247491860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can still download Portable Firefox and run it from the HD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can still download Portable Firefox and run it from the HD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can still download Portable Firefox and run it from the HD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683691</id>
	<title>Medical Display Technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247484600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm posting this anonymous so I don't get in trouble... but we recently were working with some medical displays that are used in hospitals.  Specifically these high end displays are used for diagnostic purposes - MRI, CT, X-ray, etc.  In other words- very expensive and very very regulated.</p><p>While working with the display I managed to guess the default guest access password- my coworker was astounded.  In 5 more minutes I figured out that the security schema was using XML to store the encrypted passwords (java based) and with that knowledge I manipulated the fields to use the known password.</p><p>Total time to hack the $30k device?  7 minutes.</p><p>What could I do in that mode?  I could make it fail diagnostics.  I could make it pass diagnostics.  I could make it pass self-cal when it wasn't.  I could introduce local artifacts such that it looked like 'splotches' were seen on an x-ray when there wasn't (thus possibly indicating a tumour).  I could mess with the defect maps.</p><p>Now a properly administered system would have all this locked down... but all I would have needed was a copy of the service software (web based) and the monitor connection port (usually has two or three).</p><p>Scared?  I was.  And I'm a good guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm posting this anonymous so I do n't get in trouble... but we recently were working with some medical displays that are used in hospitals .
Specifically these high end displays are used for diagnostic purposes - MRI , CT , X-ray , etc .
In other words- very expensive and very very regulated.While working with the display I managed to guess the default guest access password- my coworker was astounded .
In 5 more minutes I figured out that the security schema was using XML to store the encrypted passwords ( java based ) and with that knowledge I manipulated the fields to use the known password.Total time to hack the $ 30k device ?
7 minutes.What could I do in that mode ?
I could make it fail diagnostics .
I could make it pass diagnostics .
I could make it pass self-cal when it was n't .
I could introduce local artifacts such that it looked like 'splotches ' were seen on an x-ray when there was n't ( thus possibly indicating a tumour ) .
I could mess with the defect maps.Now a properly administered system would have all this locked down... but all I would have needed was a copy of the service software ( web based ) and the monitor connection port ( usually has two or three ) .Scared ?
I was .
And I 'm a good guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm posting this anonymous so I don't get in trouble... but we recently were working with some medical displays that are used in hospitals.
Specifically these high end displays are used for diagnostic purposes - MRI, CT, X-ray, etc.
In other words- very expensive and very very regulated.While working with the display I managed to guess the default guest access password- my coworker was astounded.
In 5 more minutes I figured out that the security schema was using XML to store the encrypted passwords (java based) and with that knowledge I manipulated the fields to use the known password.Total time to hack the $30k device?
7 minutes.What could I do in that mode?
I could make it fail diagnostics.
I could make it pass diagnostics.
I could make it pass self-cal when it wasn't.
I could introduce local artifacts such that it looked like 'splotches' were seen on an x-ray when there wasn't (thus possibly indicating a tumour).
I could mess with the defect maps.Now a properly administered system would have all this locked down... but all I would have needed was a copy of the service software (web based) and the monitor connection port (usually has two or three).Scared?
I was.
And I'm a good guy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683367</id>
	<title>Mindwipe:better than suicide.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247482740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that plenty of people have contemplated suicide. I have, and I know people who actually followed through.</p><p>I think it would be great if the Europeans  (you know americans never would) allowed would be suicides to try using the mindwipe drug in doses enough to render one a sobbering idiot. I mean, it would suck having to start over in an adult body, but imagine it like a second chance separate from your past. One has to wonder if the brain chemistry of a depressed state would survive the mindwiping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that plenty of people have contemplated suicide .
I have , and I know people who actually followed through.I think it would be great if the Europeans ( you know americans never would ) allowed would be suicides to try using the mindwipe drug in doses enough to render one a sobbering idiot .
I mean , it would suck having to start over in an adult body , but imagine it like a second chance separate from your past .
One has to wonder if the brain chemistry of a depressed state would survive the mindwiping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that plenty of people have contemplated suicide.
I have, and I know people who actually followed through.I think it would be great if the Europeans  (you know americans never would) allowed would be suicides to try using the mindwipe drug in doses enough to render one a sobbering idiot.
I mean, it would suck having to start over in an adult body, but imagine it like a second chance separate from your past.
One has to wonder if the brain chemistry of a depressed state would survive the mindwiping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682521</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.bing.com/" title="bing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/</a> [bing.com]

Use it, live it, love it. Bing! For all your searching needs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.bing.com/ [ bing.com ] Use it , live it , love it .
Bing ! For all your searching needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.bing.com/ [bing.com]

Use it, live it, love it.
Bing! For all your searching needs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683045</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247481300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually , i don't believe a soul is anything physical . It's has nothing to do with memories.<br>You remember , because of your physical brain , but you are , because of your soul.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , i do n't believe a soul is anything physical .
It 's has nothing to do with memories.You remember , because of your physical brain , but you are , because of your soul .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually , i don't believe a soul is anything physical .
It's has nothing to do with memories.You remember , because of your physical brain , but you are , because of your soul.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682713</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682545</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1247479260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have soul you've already been hacked.  By God.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have soul you 've already been hacked .
By God .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have soul you've already been hacked.
By God.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682213</id>
	<title>Here's a better idea:  +1, PatRIOTic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/13/cheney-cia-al-qaida-assassinations" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">Richard B. Cheney</a> [guardian.co.uk].<br>Surely, you hackers are able to find, detain, and deliver Cheney to The Hague.</p><p>Yours In Democracy,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Richard B. Cheney [ guardian.co.uk ] .Surely , you hackers are able to find , detain , and deliver Cheney to The Hague.Yours In Democracy,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Richard B. Cheney [guardian.co.uk].Surely, you hackers are able to find, detain, and deliver Cheney to The Hague.Yours In Democracy,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</id>
	<title>Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Realistically, how hard would it be to include an OFF switch on the external interface used for doctor diagnostics?</p><p>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</p><p>Can you take any part of that to the bank?  There is no money to follow.  There is no information to gain.</p><p>Do you see anyone hacking your IP Oven, or you IP Coffee maker?  <a href="http://workingmomwa.blogspot.com/2008/06/coffee-maker-needs-security-update.html" title="blogspot.com">http://workingmomwa.blogspot.com/2008/06/coffee-maker-needs-security-update.html</a> [blogspot.com]</p><p>How does an interface to a prosthetic limb somehow  suggest a "mine whipe".  Does my pedicure predict a lobotomy?</p><p>Come on, people.  There is some fool snickering somewhere that the drunken brainstorm he posted somewhere has actually morphed into a story on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Realistically , how hard would it be to include an OFF switch on the external interface used for doctor diagnostics ? I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ? Can you take any part of that to the bank ?
There is no money to follow .
There is no information to gain.Do you see anyone hacking your IP Oven , or you IP Coffee maker ?
http : //workingmomwa.blogspot.com/2008/06/coffee-maker-needs-security-update.html [ blogspot.com ] How does an interface to a prosthetic limb somehow suggest a " mine whipe " .
Does my pedicure predict a lobotomy ? Come on , people .
There is some fool snickering somewhere that the drunken brainstorm he posted somewhere has actually morphed into a story on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Realistically, how hard would it be to include an OFF switch on the external interface used for doctor diagnostics?I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?Can you take any part of that to the bank?
There is no money to follow.
There is no information to gain.Do you see anyone hacking your IP Oven, or you IP Coffee maker?
http://workingmomwa.blogspot.com/2008/06/coffee-maker-needs-security-update.html [blogspot.com]How does an interface to a prosthetic limb somehow  suggest a "mine whipe".
Does my pedicure predict a lobotomy?Come on, people.
There is some fool snickering somewhere that the drunken brainstorm he posted somewhere has actually morphed into a story on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687845</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>dublindan</author>
	<datestamp>1247563980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think it matters. This is "hacking" the biological aspects of the brain/body/implants, nothing to do with the soul, if it exists.<br>
<br>
My housemate just came back from the Berlin BCI Workshop and he informs me that BCI has made some huge advancements. I don't think it will be long before this stuff is real. They already have monkeys remote controlling robots with their brains, are already able to extract images from brain readings and are already able to detect stimuli with good accuracy (my housemates own p300 and other reaction detection algorithm is approx. 94\% accurate; I've seen it!) so I reckon give it maybe five to ten years and BCI will be fairly common.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it matters .
This is " hacking " the biological aspects of the brain/body/implants , nothing to do with the soul , if it exists .
My housemate just came back from the Berlin BCI Workshop and he informs me that BCI has made some huge advancements .
I do n't think it will be long before this stuff is real .
They already have monkeys remote controlling robots with their brains , are already able to extract images from brain readings and are already able to detect stimuli with good accuracy ( my housemates own p300 and other reaction detection algorithm is approx .
94 \ % accurate ; I 've seen it !
) so I reckon give it maybe five to ten years and BCI will be fairly common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it matters.
This is "hacking" the biological aspects of the brain/body/implants, nothing to do with the soul, if it exists.
My housemate just came back from the Berlin BCI Workshop and he informs me that BCI has made some huge advancements.
I don't think it will be long before this stuff is real.
They already have monkeys remote controlling robots with their brains, are already able to extract images from brain readings and are already able to detect stimuli with good accuracy (my housemates own p300 and other reaction detection algorithm is approx.
94\% accurate; I've seen it!
) so I reckon give it maybe five to ten years and BCI will be fairly common.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682463</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>DarkMage0707077</author>
	<datestamp>1247478960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alread did. Let's see them hack into my "2 + 2 = pie" algorithm! Of course, they have to figure out if I'm thinking of cherry of banana cream, first...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alread did .
Let 's see them hack into my " 2 + 2 = pie " algorithm !
Of course , they have to figure out if I 'm thinking of cherry of banana cream , first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alread did.
Let's see them hack into my "2 + 2 = pie" algorithm!
Of course, they have to figure out if I'm thinking of cherry of banana cream, first...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684629</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247490180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't me, it was the ONE ARMED MAN!!!!</p><p>Just couldn't resist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't me , it was the ONE ARMED MAN ! ! !
! Just could n't resist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't me, it was the ONE ARMED MAN!!!
!Just couldn't resist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684671</id>
	<title>Strange, Brain Hackers Already Here...</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1247490540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.worldtravelwatch.com/archives/south-america/" title="worldtravelwatch.com">Bad Guys</a> [worldtravelwatch.com] In Columbia use a plant called the "Scopola".<br>
<br>
Brain Hacking 101:<br>
1. Take the root, <br>
2. dry it out, <br>
3. grind it into powder,<br>
4. blow powder into face of victim.<br>
5. take victim to their ATM.<br>
6. victim drains account as required.<br>
7. !!! Profit !!!<br>
8. victim then wonders around till effects wear off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bad Guys [ worldtravelwatch.com ] In Columbia use a plant called the " Scopola " .
Brain Hacking 101 : 1 .
Take the root , 2. dry it out , 3. grind it into powder , 4. blow powder into face of victim .
5. take victim to their ATM .
6. victim drains account as required .
7. ! ! !
Profit ! ! !
8. victim then wonders around till effects wear off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bad Guys [worldtravelwatch.com] In Columbia use a plant called the "Scopola".
Brain Hacking 101:
1.
Take the root, 
2. dry it out, 
3. grind it into powder,
4. blow powder into face of victim.
5. take victim to their ATM.
6. victim drains account as required.
7. !!!
Profit !!!
8. victim then wonders around till effects wear off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682555</id>
	<title>Limb hacking has been done before:</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1247479320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I point you to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138510/" title="imdb.com">Idle Hands</a> [imdb.com] and what we can expect when people start hacking limbs.<br>
<br>
FYI- Some great shots of Jessica Alba...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I point you to Idle Hands [ imdb.com ] and what we can expect when people start hacking limbs .
FYI- Some great shots of Jessica Alba.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I point you to Idle Hands [imdb.com] and what we can expect when people start hacking limbs.
FYI- Some great shots of Jessica Alba...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690349</id>
	<title>Re:Spam</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1247583240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ew... good call. I'm imagining a future where people at regular intervals suddenly seize up and yell "I JUST SAVED 15 PERCENT ON CAR INSURANCE BY SWITCHING TO GEICO!" or "ASK ME ABOUT NATURAL MALE ENHANCEMENT!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ew... good call .
I 'm imagining a future where people at regular intervals suddenly seize up and yell " I JUST SAVED 15 PERCENT ON CAR INSURANCE BY SWITCHING TO GEICO !
" or " ASK ME ABOUT NATURAL MALE ENHANCEMENT !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ew... good call.
I'm imagining a future where people at regular intervals suddenly seize up and yell "I JUST SAVED 15 PERCENT ON CAR INSURANCE BY SWITCHING TO GEICO!
" or "ASK ME ABOUT NATURAL MALE ENHANCEMENT!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682237</id>
	<title>Spam</title>
	<author>the eric conspiracy</author>
	<datestamp>1247478000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big worry is not hacking, after all I am sure that there will be plenty of security software you can download, but rather the effects of spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big worry is not hacking , after all I am sure that there will be plenty of security software you can download , but rather the effects of spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big worry is not hacking, after all I am sure that there will be plenty of security software you can download, but rather the effects of spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682713</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1247479980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I agree with you.  I <i>believe</i> in souls, but that soul is in a physical body, and that body is definitely a biological machine that can be altered or manipulated.  The evidence of this is simply overwhelming -- look at mental illness.  A person's "spirit" overcoming psychological brainwashing or even more advanced technological control is a nice device for fiction, but in reality we have no reason to think that's the way it will work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I agree with you .
I believe in souls , but that soul is in a physical body , and that body is definitely a biological machine that can be altered or manipulated .
The evidence of this is simply overwhelming -- look at mental illness .
A person 's " spirit " overcoming psychological brainwashing or even more advanced technological control is a nice device for fiction , but in reality we have no reason to think that 's the way it will work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I agree with you.
I believe in souls, but that soul is in a physical body, and that body is definitely a biological machine that can be altered or manipulated.
The evidence of this is simply overwhelming -- look at mental illness.
A person's "spirit" overcoming psychological brainwashing or even more advanced technological control is a nice device for fiction, but in reality we have no reason to think that's the way it will work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683283</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1247482440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're not robots.  They're exercising free will to make a choice you disagree with.  They see it as an element of manners to show that they're not stealing, and for some reason they care about how they look to that greeter despite knowing they're not thieves.  Let them get on with it without the name-calling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not robots .
They 're exercising free will to make a choice you disagree with .
They see it as an element of manners to show that they 're not stealing , and for some reason they care about how they look to that greeter despite knowing they 're not thieves .
Let them get on with it without the name-calling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not robots.
They're exercising free will to make a choice you disagree with.
They see it as an element of manners to show that they're not stealing, and for some reason they care about how they look to that greeter despite knowing they're not thieves.
Let them get on with it without the name-calling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684189</id>
	<title>A book to read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247487600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>C.S. Friedman's "This Alien Shore"</p><p>So full of intriguing ideas it should be criminal.</p><p>Not exactly the most optimistic view of our future, either, though. Then again, it's about humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>C.S .
Friedman 's " This Alien Shore " So full of intriguing ideas it should be criminal.Not exactly the most optimistic view of our future , either , though .
Then again , it 's about humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C.S.
Friedman's "This Alien Shore"So full of intriguing ideas it should be criminal.Not exactly the most optimistic view of our future, either, though.
Then again, it's about humans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690119</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1247582160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was tagged "ghostintheshell" long before you posted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was tagged " ghostintheshell " long before you posted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was tagged "ghostintheshell" long before you posted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684817</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247491860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>theres some sense into what you are saying. Going a little extreme here would be someone in a full mechanical suit because they sufffered heavy injuries.<br>Well their suit can be hacked to rob a bank. The guy in the suit would say im being forced against my will to rob this bank. lol..</p><p>terminators: the first rise of the machines... hahaha.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>theres some sense into what you are saying .
Going a little extreme here would be someone in a full mechanical suit because they sufffered heavy injuries.Well their suit can be hacked to rob a bank .
The guy in the suit would say im being forced against my will to rob this bank .
lol..terminators : the first rise of the machines... hahaha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theres some sense into what you are saying.
Going a little extreme here would be someone in a full mechanical suit because they sufffered heavy injuries.Well their suit can be hacked to rob a bank.
The guy in the suit would say im being forced against my will to rob this bank.
lol..terminators: the first rise of the machines... hahaha.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684461</id>
	<title>Re:a risk I'm willing to take</title>
	<author>khellendros1984</author>
	<datestamp>1247489220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Her uniform was significantly less, if she wanted to be invisible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Her uniform was significantly less , if she wanted to be invisible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her uniform was significantly less, if she wanted to be invisible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682607</id>
	<title>can you say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These aren't the droids you're looking for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are n't the droids you 're looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These aren't the droids you're looking for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682335</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.</p></div><p>Of course bigfoot is hot - have you ever been inside out of those costumes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>on the other hand , you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.Of course bigfoot is hot - have you ever been inside out of those costumes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.Of course bigfoot is hot - have you ever been inside out of those costumes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683577</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Mr. Bad Example</author>
	<datestamp>1247483940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Go insane. It's the new encryption.</p><p>My brain will be running Windows Millenium Hand and Shrimp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Go insane .
It 's the new encryption.My brain will be running Windows Millenium Hand and Shrimp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Go insane.
It's the new encryption.My brain will be running Windows Millenium Hand and Shrimp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683027</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a question...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247481240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>but on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot</i>

<p>Yeah that wouldn't be frustrating!  Big Foot plays hard to get you know!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but on the other hand , you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot Yeah that would n't be frustrating !
Big Foot plays hard to get you know !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot

Yeah that wouldn't be frustrating!
Big Foot plays hard to get you know!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688117</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1247566980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see any way how you having a soal should keep hackers from hacking the prosthetics attached to your body. After all, the prosthetics <em>are</em> nothing but machines; we know that because we build them.</p><p>About the mind-wiping: The memory clearly is saved in the brain, not in the soul, or otherwise it could not be affected e.g. by drugs (unless the soul can be affected that way, too, but then the hackers could affect your soul as well). But even if the memory were stored in the soul, and could not be affected, it wouldn't really help you, because all it would mean is that you'd helplessly watch how someone else controls your body.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see any way how you having a soal should keep hackers from hacking the prosthetics attached to your body .
After all , the prosthetics are nothing but machines ; we know that because we build them.About the mind-wiping : The memory clearly is saved in the brain , not in the soul , or otherwise it could not be affected e.g .
by drugs ( unless the soul can be affected that way , too , but then the hackers could affect your soul as well ) .
But even if the memory were stored in the soul , and could not be affected , it would n't really help you , because all it would mean is that you 'd helplessly watch how someone else controls your body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see any way how you having a soal should keep hackers from hacking the prosthetics attached to your body.
After all, the prosthetics are nothing but machines; we know that because we build them.About the mind-wiping: The memory clearly is saved in the brain, not in the soul, or otherwise it could not be affected e.g.
by drugs (unless the soul can be affected that way, too, but then the hackers could affect your soul as well).
But even if the memory were stored in the soul, and could not be affected, it wouldn't really help you, because all it would mean is that you'd helplessly watch how someone else controls your body.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683439</id>
	<title>Let them...</title>
	<author>Neanderthal Ninny</author>
	<datestamp>1247483040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they can find my other sock or when I put my car keys then they have something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they can find my other sock or when I put my car keys then they have something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they can find my other sock or when I put my car keys then they have something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683071</id>
	<title>MyLimb.com</title>
	<author>infamous\_blah</author>
	<datestamp>1247481420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?</p></div><p>Don't know if he's willing to deal but...<br>
<br>
Registrant:<br>
   William Orr<br>
   5707 Mountain Oak Drive<br>
   Braselton, Georgia 30517<br>
   United States<br>
<br>
   Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)<br>
   Domain Name: MYLIMB.COM<br>
      Created on: 08-Nov-06<br>
      Expires on: 08-Nov-10<br>
      Last Updated on: 09-Nov-08</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal ? Do n't know if he 's willing to deal but.. . Registrant : William Orr 5707 Mountain Oak Drive Braselton , Georgia 30517 United States Registered through : GoDaddy.com , Inc. ( http : //www.godaddy.com ) Domain Name : MYLIMB.COM Created on : 08-Nov-06 Expires on : 08-Nov-10 Last Updated on : 09-Nov-08</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?Don't know if he's willing to deal but...

Registrant:
   William Orr
   5707 Mountain Oak Drive
   Braselton, Georgia 30517
   United States

   Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
   Domain Name: MYLIMB.COM
      Created on: 08-Nov-06
      Expires on: 08-Nov-10
      Last Updated on: 09-Nov-08
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682527</id>
	<title>Ultimate slaves?</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1247479140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sooner or later someone's going to figure out how to manipulate desire and loyalty at the molecular level.</p><p>Then all bets will be off.</p><p>Imagine if someone could kidnap you or your family members, implant a device in their brains that would make them forget their previous life and love and serve the kidnapper and do his bidding.</p><p>Or maybe I've been reading too much science fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sooner or later someone 's going to figure out how to manipulate desire and loyalty at the molecular level.Then all bets will be off.Imagine if someone could kidnap you or your family members , implant a device in their brains that would make them forget their previous life and love and serve the kidnapper and do his bidding.Or maybe I 've been reading too much science fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sooner or later someone's going to figure out how to manipulate desire and loyalty at the molecular level.Then all bets will be off.Imagine if someone could kidnap you or your family members, implant a device in their brains that would make them forget their previous life and love and serve the kidnapper and do his bidding.Or maybe I've been reading too much science fiction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682651</id>
	<title>Likely</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely include wireless controls that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, that is indeed likely. Especially since wireless controls are used in the current generation of implants, too. And those <em>are</em> <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/12/1232206" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">hackable</a> [slashdot.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely include wireless controls that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine.Yes , that is indeed likely .
Especially since wireless controls are used in the current generation of implants , too .
And those are hackable [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the next generation of implantable devices to control prosthetic limbs will likely include wireless controls that allow physicians to remotely adjust settings on the machine.Yes, that is indeed likely.
Especially since wireless controls are used in the current generation of implants, too.
And those are hackable [slashdot.org].
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685321</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a question...</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1247496480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right... instead of big muscular men passing their genes on, we'll have computer cybernerds passing their genes on.<br> <br>

In 5 - 10 generations we will have people with huge brains and arms like twigs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right... instead of big muscular men passing their genes on , we 'll have computer cybernerds passing their genes on .
In 5 - 10 generations we will have people with huge brains and arms like twigs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right... instead of big muscular men passing their genes on, we'll have computer cybernerds passing their genes on.
In 5 - 10 generations we will have people with huge brains and arms like twigs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682911</id>
	<title>Uh oh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247480820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"John, *punch* this is Jane, get over here,*punch* NOW!"<br>"What's going on?!"<br>"*punch* I can't stop punching myself! *punch*"<br>"Uhh... what?"<br>"I *punch* think my arm *punch punch* has a virus!!"<br>"*sigh* You should've switched to Firefox, like I told you. I'll come fix it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" John , * punch * this is Jane , get over here , * punch * NOW !
" " What 's going on ? !
" " * punch * I ca n't stop punching myself !
* punch * " " Uhh... what ?
" " I * punch * think my arm * punch punch * has a virus ! !
" " * sigh * You should 've switched to Firefox , like I told you .
I 'll come fix it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"John, *punch* this is Jane, get over here,*punch* NOW!
""What's going on?!
""*punch* I can't stop punching myself!
*punch*""Uhh... what?
""I *punch* think my arm *punch punch* has a virus!!
""*sigh* You should've switched to Firefox, like I told you.
I'll come fix it.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689573</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1247579880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Johnny Mnemonic
<p> Coming to a psychiatrist near you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Johnny Mnemonic Coming to a psychiatrist near you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Johnny Mnemonic
 Coming to a psychiatrist near you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685701</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1247499780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</p></div><p>I take it you have not seen 4chan?</p><p>They do it for the lulz</p><p>And for people with dark senses of humor, hacking into someone else's leg is bubbling over the top with lulz</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ? I take it you have not seen 4chan ? They do it for the lulzAnd for people with dark senses of humor , hacking into someone else 's leg is bubbling over the top with lulz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?I take it you have not seen 4chan?They do it for the lulzAnd for people with dark senses of humor, hacking into someone else's leg is bubbling over the top with lulz
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682445</id>
	<title>sigh</title>
	<author>greymond</author>
	<datestamp>1247478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>really? Are people this bored from being unemployed that they need to work on articles like this to pass the time. I'm disappointed with a side of disgruntled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>really ?
Are people this bored from being unemployed that they need to work on articles like this to pass the time .
I 'm disappointed with a side of disgruntled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really?
Are people this bored from being unemployed that they need to work on articles like this to pass the time.
I'm disappointed with a side of disgruntled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687881</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247564400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Igor! Remember to give it more RAM and a better processor this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Igor !
Remember to give it more RAM and a better processor this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Igor!
Remember to give it more RAM and a better processor this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687211</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>zoloto</author>
	<datestamp>1247513700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>how about this: (I use the definition that a spirit and body combined equals the soul of a being)<br><br>the spirit is both limited (due to the human body's imperfections) and enhanced (without a body the spirit couldn't do what the combination does).<br><br>So if there's a chemical imbalance or physical damage, the spirit is in a sense crippled and limited in its ability to function with the body.<br><br>I'm not saying developing an AI that has its own man given intelligence doesn't have a "soul" of its own. After all, who are we as lesser life forms of any Gods to judge what is an isn't intelligence, even at our own hands?</htmltext>
<tokenext>how about this : ( I use the definition that a spirit and body combined equals the soul of a being ) the spirit is both limited ( due to the human body 's imperfections ) and enhanced ( without a body the spirit could n't do what the combination does ) .So if there 's a chemical imbalance or physical damage , the spirit is in a sense crippled and limited in its ability to function with the body.I 'm not saying developing an AI that has its own man given intelligence does n't have a " soul " of its own .
After all , who are we as lesser life forms of any Gods to judge what is an is n't intelligence , even at our own hands ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about this: (I use the definition that a spirit and body combined equals the soul of a being)the spirit is both limited (due to the human body's imperfections) and enhanced (without a body the spirit couldn't do what the combination does).So if there's a chemical imbalance or physical damage, the spirit is in a sense crippled and limited in its ability to function with the body.I'm not saying developing an AI that has its own man given intelligence doesn't have a "soul" of its own.
After all, who are we as lesser life forms of any Gods to judge what is an isn't intelligence, even at our own hands?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682699</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A hacker will gain root to your leg, grab a pen with it and write a threatening message that if<br>you don't  comply, it will kick you in the nuts with its heel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A hacker will gain root to your leg , grab a pen with it and write a threatening message that ifyou do n't comply , it will kick you in the nuts with its heel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A hacker will gain root to your leg, grab a pen with it and write a threatening message that ifyou don't  comply, it will kick you in the nuts with its heel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682367</id>
	<title>No matrix for me thankyou</title>
	<author>Temujin\_12</author>
	<datestamp>1247478540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is why if/when direct brain IO is developed, you won't find me anywhere near it, unless I am in a situation where it is the only option to restore normal faculties (ie: injury or illness). Currently, when a power surge or an attack occurs against my device/computer the damage maxes out at the value of the device (assuming I'm backing up data). If a power surge or an attack occurs via a direct link hooked up to my brain, the damage is total.</p><p>That said, the article is still relevant because neuro-tech has great potential to increase the quality and length of life in ways currently not possible. As always, it's important to stop and think about the short/long term consequences of actions (novel thought).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why if/when direct brain IO is developed , you wo n't find me anywhere near it , unless I am in a situation where it is the only option to restore normal faculties ( ie : injury or illness ) .
Currently , when a power surge or an attack occurs against my device/computer the damage maxes out at the value of the device ( assuming I 'm backing up data ) .
If a power surge or an attack occurs via a direct link hooked up to my brain , the damage is total.That said , the article is still relevant because neuro-tech has great potential to increase the quality and length of life in ways currently not possible .
As always , it 's important to stop and think about the short/long term consequences of actions ( novel thought ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why if/when direct brain IO is developed, you won't find me anywhere near it, unless I am in a situation where it is the only option to restore normal faculties (ie: injury or illness).
Currently, when a power surge or an attack occurs against my device/computer the damage maxes out at the value of the device (assuming I'm backing up data).
If a power surge or an attack occurs via a direct link hooked up to my brain, the damage is total.That said, the article is still relevant because neuro-tech has great potential to increase the quality and length of life in ways currently not possible.
As always, it's important to stop and think about the short/long term consequences of actions (novel thought).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684055</id>
	<title>Religion... the ultimate mind wipe</title>
	<author>snowblind</author>
	<datestamp>1247486760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How else can you be trained so thoroughly to ignore evidence right before eyes? It's the thing science fiction writers have dreamt about and the Catholic church has perfected in their indoctrination rituals. So complete is the brainwashing that people are willing to hand over their very last penny to an elected official wearing custom made Italian shoes, a pointy hat and living in a great white palace.</p><p>`Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous,' he told the meeting. `If a man really wanted to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his own religion.'<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - L. Ron Hubbard</p><p>"But I have always thought there might be a lot of cash in starting a new religion...".<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; - George Orwell</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How else can you be trained so thoroughly to ignore evidence right before eyes ?
It 's the thing science fiction writers have dreamt about and the Catholic church has perfected in their indoctrination rituals .
So complete is the brainwashing that people are willing to hand over their very last penny to an elected official wearing custom made Italian shoes , a pointy hat and living in a great white palace. ` Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous, ' he told the meeting .
` If a man really wanted to make a million dollars , the best way to do it would be start his own religion .
'                                                                                                                                     - L. Ron Hubbard " But I have always thought there might be a lot of cash in starting a new religion... " .
                                                                                                                                    - George Orwell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How else can you be trained so thoroughly to ignore evidence right before eyes?
It's the thing science fiction writers have dreamt about and the Catholic church has perfected in their indoctrination rituals.
So complete is the brainwashing that people are willing to hand over their very last penny to an elected official wearing custom made Italian shoes, a pointy hat and living in a great white palace.`Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous,' he told the meeting.
`If a man really wanted to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his own religion.
'
                                                                                                                                    - L. Ron Hubbard"But I have always thought there might be a lot of cash in starting a new religion...".
                                                                                                                                    - George Orwell</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682353</id>
	<title>ALREADY HAPPENED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be the election of the closet marxist socialist militant afrocentrist obama who is now working to make the world a "better place".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be the election of the closet marxist socialist militant afrocentrist obama who is now working to make the world a " better place " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be the election of the closet marxist socialist militant afrocentrist obama who is now working to make the world a "better place".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688137</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>dublindan</author>
	<datestamp>1247567100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say it means that the software (the thought processes) has BSOD'd and the user (the soul) is temporarily locked out. After a quick reboot, the soul is back in control and you wake up, or whatever. The biggest mistake God ever made was to allow Microsoft to make our Operating System.. I'm sure most of our personality and mental disorders are really just driver bugs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say it means that the software ( the thought processes ) has BSOD 'd and the user ( the soul ) is temporarily locked out .
After a quick reboot , the soul is back in control and you wake up , or whatever .
The biggest mistake God ever made was to allow Microsoft to make our Operating System.. I 'm sure most of our personality and mental disorders are really just driver bugs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say it means that the software (the thought processes) has BSOD'd and the user (the soul) is temporarily locked out.
After a quick reboot, the soul is back in control and you wake up, or whatever.
The biggest mistake God ever made was to allow Microsoft to make our Operating System.. I'm sure most of our personality and mental disorders are really just driver bugs...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682105</id>
	<title>Suddenly a Tinfoil hat seems like common sense.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1247477340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Goddamned, the unintended consequence of techonological evolution is that it makes every conspiracy theory ultimately more likely to do in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goddamned , the unintended consequence of techonological evolution is that it makes every conspiracy theory ultimately more likely to do in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goddamned, the unintended consequence of techonological evolution is that it makes every conspiracy theory ultimately more likely to do in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683219</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1247482140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the soul was all that mattered, then if we smacked our head really hard and our brain was damaged, it would have no effect on our behavior.  But we know that people with brain damage are severely impaired both physically and mentally.  So if you can disrupt the impulses in the brain you could shut down a human.  If you can control the impulses, you can control the human.<br> <br>I am not saying people can't have souls, I am just saying the soul doesn't control our body.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the soul was all that mattered , then if we smacked our head really hard and our brain was damaged , it would have no effect on our behavior .
But we know that people with brain damage are severely impaired both physically and mentally .
So if you can disrupt the impulses in the brain you could shut down a human .
If you can control the impulses , you can control the human .
I am not saying people ca n't have souls , I am just saying the soul does n't control our body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the soul was all that mattered, then if we smacked our head really hard and our brain was damaged, it would have no effect on our behavior.
But we know that people with brain damage are severely impaired both physically and mentally.
So if you can disrupt the impulses in the brain you could shut down a human.
If you can control the impulses, you can control the human.
I am not saying people can't have souls, I am just saying the soul doesn't control our body.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683899</id>
	<title>5th ave</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1247485920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fifth avenue advertisers have this all sewed up.  Been doing it for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fifth avenue advertisers have this all sewed up .
Been doing it for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fifth avenue advertisers have this all sewed up.
Been doing it for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683979</id>
	<title>"The Battle for Your Mind"</title>
	<author>SaffronMiner</author>
	<datestamp>1247486340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
<p> <i> <a href="http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/98Spring/thomas.htm" title="army.mil" rel="nofollow">The
Mind Has No Firewall</a> [army.mil] </i> by Timothy L. Thomas at the Army War
Collage.</p><p>If you want to take this subject seriously, and I really recommend that you do,
then you need a copy of this book:</p><p> <i> <a href="https://www.earthpulse.com/src/product.asp?productid=212" title="earthpulse.com" rel="nofollow">Controlling
the Human Mind : The Technologies of Political Control or Tools
for Peak Performance</a> [earthpulse.com] </i> by Dr. Nick Begich; ISBN
1-890693-54-5.</p><p>It is a well researched book on what is going on in the field, based on
publicly available documents.</p><p>For full disclosure Dr. Begich sent me a free review copy of the
book when it was released.  I have supplied Dr. B. with
background material over the years.</p><p>Links to the following papers <a href="https://www.earthpulse.com/src/product.asp?productid=212" title="earthpulse.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [earthpulse.com]:</p><blockquote><div><ul>
  <li>Mind Control: The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick Begich</li><li>US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights - by Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton</li><li>Advanced Neural Implants and Control - DARPA.</li><li>Soviet and Czechoslovakian Parapsychology Research - Defense Intelligence Agency</li><li>Paraphysics R &amp; D Warsaw Pact - Defense Intelligence Agency</li><li>Controlled Offensive Behavior - USSR Defense Intelligence Agency</li><li>Science &amp; Technology for New DoD Capabilities</li><li>Interactive Neuronal and Nanoelectronic/photonic Circuits</li><li>Darpatech 2002 Symposium - Transforming Fantasy</li><li>Synthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind Wars by Richard Alan Miller</li><li>USSR Hypnosis at a Distance Defense Intelligence Agency</li><li>DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ~ OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECNAVINST 3900.39D HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM</li></ul></div>
</blockquote><p>I'll add <i> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0bz4I33cPc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">The Battle for Your Mind</a> [youtube.com] </i> to the list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Mind Has No Firewall [ army.mil ] by Timothy L. Thomas at the Army War Collage.If you want to take this subject seriously , and I really recommend that you do , then you need a copy of this book : Controlling the Human Mind : The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance [ earthpulse.com ] by Dr. Nick Begich ; ISBN 1-890693-54-5.It is a well researched book on what is going on in the field , based on publicly available documents.For full disclosure Dr. Begich sent me a free review copy of the book when it was released .
I have supplied Dr. B. with background material over the years.Links to the following papers here [ earthpulse.com ] : Mind Control : The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick BegichUS Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights - by Peter Phillips , Lew Brown and Bridget ThorntonAdvanced Neural Implants and Control - DARPA.Soviet and Czechoslovakian Parapsychology Research - Defense Intelligence AgencyParaphysics R &amp; D Warsaw Pact - Defense Intelligence AgencyControlled Offensive Behavior - USSR Defense Intelligence AgencyScience &amp; Technology for New DoD CapabilitiesInteractive Neuronal and Nanoelectronic/photonic CircuitsDarpatech 2002 Symposium - Transforming FantasySynthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind Wars by Richard Alan MillerUSSR Hypnosis at a Distance Defense Intelligence AgencyDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ~ OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECNAVINST 3900.39D HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM I 'll add The Battle for Your Mind [ youtube.com ] to the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  The
Mind Has No Firewall [army.mil]  by Timothy L. Thomas at the Army War
Collage.If you want to take this subject seriously, and I really recommend that you do,
then you need a copy of this book:  Controlling
the Human Mind : The Technologies of Political Control or Tools
for Peak Performance [earthpulse.com]  by Dr. Nick Begich; ISBN
1-890693-54-5.It is a well researched book on what is going on in the field, based on
publicly available documents.For full disclosure Dr. Begich sent me a free review copy of the
book when it was released.
I have supplied Dr. B. with
background material over the years.Links to the following papers here [earthpulse.com]:
  Mind Control: The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick BegichUS Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights - by Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget ThorntonAdvanced Neural Implants and Control - DARPA.Soviet and Czechoslovakian Parapsychology Research - Defense Intelligence AgencyParaphysics R &amp; D Warsaw Pact - Defense Intelligence AgencyControlled Offensive Behavior - USSR Defense Intelligence AgencyScience &amp; Technology for New DoD CapabilitiesInteractive Neuronal and Nanoelectronic/photonic CircuitsDarpatech 2002 Symposium - Transforming FantasySynthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind Wars by Richard Alan MillerUSSR Hypnosis at a Distance Defense Intelligence AgencyDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ~ OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECNAVINST 3900.39D HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM
I'll add  The Battle for Your Mind [youtube.com]  to the list.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682635</id>
	<title>Re:a risk I'm willing to take</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series.)</p></div><p>I think it was appropriate. After all, she ran a virtual brothel out of her internal servers in her off hours.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series .
) I think it was appropriate .
After all , she ran a virtual brothel out of her internal servers in her off hours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series.
)I think it was appropriate.
After all, she ran a virtual brothel out of her internal servers in her off hours.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682621</id>
	<title>Go ahead, hack away</title>
	<author>actionbastard</author>
	<datestamp>1247479620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not using more than 90\% of it anyway. So maybe someone can make good use of the rest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not using more than 90 \ % of it anyway .
So maybe someone can make good use of the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not using more than 90\% of it anyway.
So maybe someone can make good use of the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685849</id>
	<title>Brain hack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GHOST HACK GHOST HACK</p><p>Who are you? Who slips into my robot body and whispers to my ghost?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GHOST HACK GHOST HACKWho are you ?
Who slips into my robot body and whispers to my ghost ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GHOST HACK GHOST HACKWho are you?
Who slips into my robot body and whispers to my ghost?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685997</id>
	<title>School yard bullies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247501760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*punches own head with robotic arm*</p><p>"You're doin' it to yourself man!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* punches own head with robotic arm * " You 're doin ' it to yourself man !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*punches own head with robotic arm*"You're doin' it to yourself man!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682317</id>
	<title>Jokes in Summaries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?</p></div><p>Ah ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<br> <br>
Am I the only person who notices that every single summary submitter tries to show off his nonexistent ability to be funny? This doesn't help the summary and every time I read a stupid joke in the summary like that, I have a mental facepalm. They make me feel embarrassed for the thread submitter, and it hurts; kind of like watching a really bad performance at a talent show.
<br> <br>
Seriously, if you submit a thread, don't put a joke in it, because chances are your joke sucks and isn't funny. There are PLENTY of funny people on Slashdot, but you are not one of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal ? Ah ha ha ha ha ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Am I the only person who notices that every single summary submitter tries to show off his nonexistent ability to be funny ?
This does n't help the summary and every time I read a stupid joke in the summary like that , I have a mental facepalm .
They make me feel embarrassed for the thread submitter , and it hurts ; kind of like watching a really bad performance at a talent show .
Seriously , if you submit a thread , do n't put a joke in it , because chances are your joke sucks and is n't funny .
There are PLENTY of funny people on Slashdot , but you are not one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who has MyLimb.com parked and is willing to deal?Ah ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Am I the only person who notices that every single summary submitter tries to show off his nonexistent ability to be funny?
This doesn't help the summary and every time I read a stupid joke in the summary like that, I have a mental facepalm.
They make me feel embarrassed for the thread submitter, and it hurts; kind of like watching a really bad performance at a talent show.
Seriously, if you submit a thread, don't put a joke in it, because chances are your joke sucks and isn't funny.
There are PLENTY of funny people on Slashdot, but you are not one of them.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683545</id>
	<title>Re:The CIA has had this tech for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They actually have researched "brain wiping" during the cold war and found out that ECT (Electroconvulsive therapy) is quite effective in turning a functional human being into a completely blank husk. What they never could figure out is the reprogramming part. Not really surprising since it normally takes years to successfully program a human through painstaking education.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They actually have researched " brain wiping " during the cold war and found out that ECT ( Electroconvulsive therapy ) is quite effective in turning a functional human being into a completely blank husk .
What they never could figure out is the reprogramming part .
Not really surprising since it normally takes years to successfully program a human through painstaking education .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They actually have researched "brain wiping" during the cold war and found out that ECT (Electroconvulsive therapy) is quite effective in turning a functional human being into a completely blank husk.
What they never could figure out is the reprogramming part.
Not really surprising since it normally takes years to successfully program a human through painstaking education.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687503</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1247603340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</p></div><p>Give me your wallet or I'll make that person kick you!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ? Give me your wallet or I 'll make that person kick you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?Give me your wallet or I'll make that person kick you!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683655</id>
	<title>Re:a risk I'm willing to take</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1247484420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>She was almost 100\% artificial. Would clothing really have given her any advantage? When she needs more armor, she tends to put it on. But it's been a while since I've watched those episodes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She was almost 100 \ % artificial .
Would clothing really have given her any advantage ?
When she needs more armor , she tends to put it on .
But it 's been a while since I 've watched those episodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She was almost 100\% artificial.
Would clothing really have given her any advantage?
When she needs more armor, she tends to put it on.
But it's been a while since I've watched those episodes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683477</id>
	<title>This has existed for years</title>
	<author>scerruti</author>
	<datestamp>1247483220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's called advertising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's called advertising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's called advertising.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682403</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>tisepti</author>
	<datestamp>1247478660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About the only situation i can see such a thing mattering one way or the other is in the situation where you are attempting to control what the target thinks given some input. However even without controlling the 'biological machine' said 'brain hacker' would have access to input (Cochlear Implants) and output (prosthetic limb).</p><p>Given enough i/o - controlling the actual machine doesn't really matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About the only situation i can see such a thing mattering one way or the other is in the situation where you are attempting to control what the target thinks given some input .
However even without controlling the 'biological machine ' said 'brain hacker ' would have access to input ( Cochlear Implants ) and output ( prosthetic limb ) .Given enough i/o - controlling the actual machine does n't really matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About the only situation i can see such a thing mattering one way or the other is in the situation where you are attempting to control what the target thinks given some input.
However even without controlling the 'biological machine' said 'brain hacker' would have access to input (Cochlear Implants) and output (prosthetic limb).Given enough i/o - controlling the actual machine doesn't really matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684625</id>
	<title>How would you know?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247490180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That this hasn't already happened to you?</p><p>Every little mosquito is just coming to inject you with more 'truth' serum so your mind is easier to control and your memory is easier to modify.</p><p>See, you forgot that, didn't you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That this has n't already happened to you ? Every little mosquito is just coming to inject you with more 'truth ' serum so your mind is easier to control and your memory is easier to modify.See , you forgot that , did n't you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That this hasn't already happened to you?Every little mosquito is just coming to inject you with more 'truth' serum so your mind is easier to control and your memory is easier to modify.See, you forgot that, didn't you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682427</id>
	<title>Brain Haching with Rupert Murdoch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hasn't Rupert Murdoch been hacking into people's brains for years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't Rupert Murdoch been hacking into people 's brains for years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't Rupert Murdoch been hacking into people's brains for years?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683383</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1247482800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, people will hack in to all these things.  If not for profit, they will do it for the challenge and fun of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , people will hack in to all these things .
If not for profit , they will do it for the challenge and fun of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, people will hack in to all these things.
If not for profit, they will do it for the challenge and fun of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682917</id>
	<title>Brain hacking</title>
	<author>hessian</author>
	<datestamp>1247480820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brain hacking has been around for a long time. Its primary vector is language.</p><p>Marketing, peer pressure, memes, prophecies, and rumors are all brain hacking.</p><p>It's just not a direct connection, but given how badly so many things have turned out at the hands of a large informed group, it looks like it succeeds most of the time.</p><p>There is only one solution: learn philosophy and critical thinking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain hacking has been around for a long time .
Its primary vector is language.Marketing , peer pressure , memes , prophecies , and rumors are all brain hacking.It 's just not a direct connection , but given how badly so many things have turned out at the hands of a large informed group , it looks like it succeeds most of the time.There is only one solution : learn philosophy and critical thinking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain hacking has been around for a long time.
Its primary vector is language.Marketing, peer pressure, memes, prophecies, and rumors are all brain hacking.It's just not a direct connection, but given how badly so many things have turned out at the hands of a large informed group, it looks like it succeeds most of the time.There is only one solution: learn philosophy and critical thinking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682243</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>ocularDeathRay</author>
	<datestamp>1247478000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was just thinking the good news is that if somebody hacks my brain, they will just find all the information from the internet that I have filled it with.
<br> <br>
goatse, <br>
eel soup, <br>
two girls one cup, <br>
kids in sandbox, <br>
dump.jpg (ok that one was off of a Hermes II bbs back in the day, not the internet)
<br> <br>
I mean if they want that stuff... they can have it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just thinking the good news is that if somebody hacks my brain , they will just find all the information from the internet that I have filled it with .
goatse , eel soup , two girls one cup , kids in sandbox , dump.jpg ( ok that one was off of a Hermes II bbs back in the day , not the internet ) I mean if they want that stuff... they can have it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just thinking the good news is that if somebody hacks my brain, they will just find all the information from the internet that I have filled it with.
goatse, 
eel soup, 
two girls one cup, 
kids in sandbox, 
dump.jpg (ok that one was off of a Hermes II bbs back in the day, not the internet)
 
I mean if they want that stuff... they can have it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253</id>
	<title>OK, tell the truth</title>
	<author>$RANDOMLUSER</author>
	<datestamp>1247478060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb."</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Who else has a clear mental picture of Dr. Strangelove being choked by his own (gloved) hand?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb .
" Who else has a clear mental picture of Dr. Strangelove being choked by his own ( gloved ) hand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb.
"

Who else has a clear mental picture of Dr. Strangelove being choked by his own (gloved) hand?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689043</id>
	<title>A certain article...</title>
	<author>g34rs</author>
	<datestamp>1247577360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A certain article comes to mind...<br>
<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...hmmm where did I place it? Ah! Here it is!<br>
<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/12/1232206" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/12/1232206</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A certain article comes to mind.. . ...hmmm where did I place it ?
Ah ! Here it is !
http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 08/03/12/1232206 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A certain article comes to mind...
 ...hmmm where did I place it?
Ah! Here it is!
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/12/1232206 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689215</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>DanJ\_UK</author>
	<datestamp>1247578260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, people wearing tinfoil hats have been right all along.

I'll just have to start encrypted thinking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , people wearing tinfoil hats have been right all along .
I 'll just have to start encrypted thinking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, people wearing tinfoil hats have been right all along.
I'll just have to start encrypted thinking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682359</id>
	<title>Don't worry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neo will swing in at the last moment and prevent the hack... or is that Wintermute..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neo will swing in at the last moment and prevent the hack... or is that Wintermute. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neo will swing in at the last moment and prevent the hack... or is that Wintermute..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686577</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1247506380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?"</p><p>One word: Lolz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ?
" One word : Lolz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?
"One word: Lolz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682603</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Smidge207</author>
	<datestamp>1247479560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I roll the odometer back a few years as well?</p><p>=Smidge=</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I roll the odometer back a few years as well ? = Smidge =</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I roll the odometer back a few years as well?=Smidge=</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682331</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>hodet</author>
	<datestamp>1247478420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So tomorrows hackers/crackers are taking arts courses?  Psych 101?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So tomorrows hackers/crackers are taking arts courses ?
Psych 101 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So tomorrows hackers/crackers are taking arts courses?
Psych 101?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682163</id>
	<title>Personally...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. given human history the fall out of mind hacking may be a good thing, all of our problems come from human beings not being able to seperate truth from falsehood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. given human history the fall out of mind hacking may be a good thing , all of our problems come from human beings not being able to seperate truth from falsehood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. given human history the fall out of mind hacking may be a good thing, all of our problems come from human beings not being able to seperate truth from falsehood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684929</id>
	<title>Paycheck</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1247492640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if they will be able to tag memories from a certain time onward ala Paycheck.  Maybe give a drug that binds harmlessly to all previously stored memories, but also protects those from the wipe...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they will be able to tag memories from a certain time onward ala Paycheck .
Maybe give a drug that binds harmlessly to all previously stored memories , but also protects those from the wipe.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they will be able to tag memories from a certain time onward ala Paycheck.
Maybe give a drug that binds harmlessly to all previously stored memories, but also protects those from the wipe...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28691221</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247587080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</p></div><p>A reality tv show where people hack your bionic leg to kick people in the ass. It will be called <i>Survive This!</i> </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ? A reality tv show where people hack your bionic leg to kick people in the ass .
It will be called Survive This !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?A reality tv show where people hack your bionic leg to kick people in the ass.
It will be called Survive This! 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682991</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1247481060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That people volunteer to shop at Walmart is sufficient evidence of programming.  Every time I go to a {Walmart, Best Buy,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...} I have a feeling that I'm the butt of a joke to see how much dignity you will resign for a couple of bucks.   Kind of like a reality version of The Price Is Right in your own neighbourhood.   Maybe I took too much acid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That people volunteer to shop at Walmart is sufficient evidence of programming .
Every time I go to a { Walmart , Best Buy , ... } I have a feeling that I 'm the butt of a joke to see how much dignity you will resign for a couple of bucks .
Kind of like a reality version of The Price Is Right in your own neighbourhood .
Maybe I took too much acid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That people volunteer to shop at Walmart is sufficient evidence of programming.
Every time I go to a {Walmart, Best Buy, ...} I have a feeling that I'm the butt of a joke to see how much dignity you will resign for a couple of bucks.
Kind of like a reality version of The Price Is Right in your own neighbourhood.
Maybe I took too much acid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683729</id>
	<title>Re:a risk I'm willing to take</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1247484960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just be glad she didn't have cat ears and a ridiculously large bell around her neck. It's Japanese-- you get what you can take!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just be glad she did n't have cat ears and a ridiculously large bell around her neck .
It 's Japanese-- you get what you can take !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just be glad she didn't have cat ears and a ridiculously large bell around her neck.
It's Japanese-- you get what you can take!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682671</id>
	<title>Re:Ack, should have aimed this at 'Snow Crash'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what I haven't figured out yet: Will the geeks be at the forefront of brain hacking, experimenting with drugs and electrodes, or will they be the ones who treat their brain like a temple, forgoing boosters and "mindless" fun, because they know the risks? You know, like geeks hardly ever get viruses and worms on their computers, while other people seemingly can't open a browser without catching a couple of bugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what I have n't figured out yet : Will the geeks be at the forefront of brain hacking , experimenting with drugs and electrodes , or will they be the ones who treat their brain like a temple , forgoing boosters and " mindless " fun , because they know the risks ?
You know , like geeks hardly ever get viruses and worms on their computers , while other people seemingly ca n't open a browser without catching a couple of bugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what I haven't figured out yet: Will the geeks be at the forefront of brain hacking, experimenting with drugs and electrodes, or will they be the ones who treat their brain like a temple, forgoing boosters and "mindless" fun, because they know the risks?
You know, like geeks hardly ever get viruses and worms on their computers, while other people seemingly can't open a browser without catching a couple of bugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682441</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>no dude, first thought I had was "sweet, ghosthacking like a motherfucker"</htmltext>
<tokenext>no dude , first thought I had was " sweet , ghosthacking like a motherfucker "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no dude, first thought I had was "sweet, ghosthacking like a motherfucker"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682409</id>
	<title>Langford Fractal Basilisk</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1247478720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better get in practice... start a shudder club today!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better get in practice... start a shudder club today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better get in practice... start a shudder club today!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687833</id>
	<title>Sensational titles FTL</title>
	<author>tmkn</author>
	<datestamp>1247563920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We already have a way to wipe peoples brain. Remember <strong>guns</strong>? In some parts of the world, <em>any adult</em> can own an instant mind-wiping device. Some countries also posess weaponry that can wipe any existence of a city. People suddenly forgot that we are able to nuke the whole planet of ours out of life at any time?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have a way to wipe peoples brain .
Remember guns ?
In some parts of the world , any adult can own an instant mind-wiping device .
Some countries also posess weaponry that can wipe any existence of a city .
People suddenly forgot that we are able to nuke the whole planet of ours out of life at any time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have a way to wipe peoples brain.
Remember guns?
In some parts of the world, any adult can own an instant mind-wiping device.
Some countries also posess weaponry that can wipe any existence of a city.
People suddenly forgot that we are able to nuke the whole planet of ours out of life at any time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684433</id>
	<title>Stop...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247489100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb."

Stop hitting yourself! I said stop!  Oh wait, you can't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb .
" Stop hitting yourself !
I said stop !
Oh wait , you ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...an attacker could hijack the device and take over the robotic limb.
"

Stop hitting yourself!
I said stop!
Oh wait, you can't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686457</id>
	<title>Empty</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247505300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there's not much going on inside my brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there 's not much going on inside my brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there's not much going on inside my brain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690725</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>nobodylocalhost</author>
	<datestamp>1247584860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You already use vm. When ever you are "thinking in someone else's shoes" you are essentially using a vm. Although brain level virtualization is more like how OpenVZ works rather than Xen or VMWare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You already use vm .
When ever you are " thinking in someone else 's shoes " you are essentially using a vm .
Although brain level virtualization is more like how OpenVZ works rather than Xen or VMWare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You already use vm.
When ever you are "thinking in someone else's shoes" you are essentially using a vm.
Although brain level virtualization is more like how OpenVZ works rather than Xen or VMWare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683389</id>
	<title>Oh gods...</title>
	<author>Theodore</author>
	<datestamp>1247482800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we just down-peg anything from Wired as "author has read too much cyberpunk"?</p><p>Yes, these issues have been anticipated.<br>no, your worrying about it will only cost you your time and life (stress).</p><p>OK, so some weird commands are supposed to make someone do something totally opposed to their basic character?<br>Sounds like 19th century hypnosis.<br>It was crap then, it's crap now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we just down-peg anything from Wired as " author has read too much cyberpunk " ? Yes , these issues have been anticipated.no , your worrying about it will only cost you your time and life ( stress ) .OK , so some weird commands are supposed to make someone do something totally opposed to their basic character ? Sounds like 19th century hypnosis.It was crap then , it 's crap now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we just down-peg anything from Wired as "author has read too much cyberpunk"?Yes, these issues have been anticipated.no, your worrying about it will only cost you your time and life (stress).OK, so some weird commands are supposed to make someone do something totally opposed to their basic character?Sounds like 19th century hypnosis.It was crap then, it's crap now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684353</id>
	<title>Re:OK, tell the truth</title>
	<author>JohnnyLocust</author>
	<datestamp>1247488620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen an evil penguin do this to steal a giant diamond: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Wrong\_Trousers" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Wrong\_Trousers</a> [wikipedia.org] <br> <br>Curse those evil penguins!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen an evil penguin do this to steal a giant diamond : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Wrong \ _Trousers [ wikipedia.org ] Curse those evil penguins !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen an evil penguin do this to steal a giant diamond: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Wrong\_Trousers [wikipedia.org]  Curse those evil penguins!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682125</id>
	<title>Targeting MY brain?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HA!  They'll have to FIND it first!</p><p>Don't they know?!?  Never go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line!</p><p>HA!  HA HA! HA!...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HA !
They 'll have to FIND it first ! Do n't they know ? ! ?
Never go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line ! HA !
HA HA !
HA ! .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HA!
They'll have to FIND it first!Don't they know?!?
Never go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line!HA!
HA HA!
HA!...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682327</id>
	<title>I for one</title>
	<author>polymerousgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247478420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>welcome our new wireless overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new wireless overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new wireless overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686309</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247504160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure is a nice artificial leg you've got there. Sure would be a shame if something happened to it.</p><p>I might be able to arrange some protection, for a fee...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure is a nice artificial leg you 've got there .
Sure would be a shame if something happened to it.I might be able to arrange some protection , for a fee.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure is a nice artificial leg you've got there.
Sure would be a shame if something happened to it.I might be able to arrange some protection, for a fee...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</id>
	<title>Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>tchuladdiass</author>
	<datestamp>1247478360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone at work mentioned to me recently that it will be a scary day when someone can program your brain.  Well I've already seen it happen.  My local Walmart is in sort of a high-risk part of town, so the "greeters" will ask to see your receipt if you have any bulk items in your cart that aren't in bags.  So people get used to having their receipt handy when they walk out the door.  Now yesterday it was kind of busy, and one greeter to check receipts.  Guess what I saw?  A line of about 10 people waiting to show their receipt before leaving the store.  Meanwhile I push my cart right around them (I've already waited in line for 25 minutes just to pay, I'm not going to wait again to leave the store).  It appears that those in line were robots that have been programmed (conditioned) so much that they couldn't think of leaving without waiting to show their receipt.  Keep in mind that there is not sign saying you have to show your receipt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone at work mentioned to me recently that it will be a scary day when someone can program your brain .
Well I 've already seen it happen .
My local Walmart is in sort of a high-risk part of town , so the " greeters " will ask to see your receipt if you have any bulk items in your cart that are n't in bags .
So people get used to having their receipt handy when they walk out the door .
Now yesterday it was kind of busy , and one greeter to check receipts .
Guess what I saw ?
A line of about 10 people waiting to show their receipt before leaving the store .
Meanwhile I push my cart right around them ( I 've already waited in line for 25 minutes just to pay , I 'm not going to wait again to leave the store ) .
It appears that those in line were robots that have been programmed ( conditioned ) so much that they could n't think of leaving without waiting to show their receipt .
Keep in mind that there is not sign saying you have to show your receipt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone at work mentioned to me recently that it will be a scary day when someone can program your brain.
Well I've already seen it happen.
My local Walmart is in sort of a high-risk part of town, so the "greeters" will ask to see your receipt if you have any bulk items in your cart that aren't in bags.
So people get used to having their receipt handy when they walk out the door.
Now yesterday it was kind of busy, and one greeter to check receipts.
Guess what I saw?
A line of about 10 people waiting to show their receipt before leaving the store.
Meanwhile I push my cart right around them (I've already waited in line for 25 minutes just to pay, I'm not going to wait again to leave the store).
It appears that those in line were robots that have been programmed (conditioned) so much that they couldn't think of leaving without waiting to show their receipt.
Keep in mind that there is not sign saying you have to show your receipt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688985</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247576820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hackers are already hacking your brain.  We call it "social engineering" and it's been discussed here before.  That said, I would be more concerned about the con artists, sales reps and others who want to hack your brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hackers are already hacking your brain .
We call it " social engineering " and it 's been discussed here before .
That said , I would be more concerned about the con artists , sales reps and others who want to hack your brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hackers are already hacking your brain.
We call it "social engineering" and it's been discussed here before.
That said, I would be more concerned about the con artists, sales reps and others who want to hack your brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684085</id>
	<title>...so we really are a virus</title>
	<author>oneiron</author>
	<datestamp>1247486820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure we can take care of <i>the machines</i>, but I really hope the immune system isn't watching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure we can take care of the machines , but I really hope the immune system is n't watching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure we can take care of the machines, but I really hope the immune system isn't watching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683609</id>
	<title>too late for ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247484120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>CNN, f-o-x got to some of us people.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... cant<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..stop.. the BS. and you don't need to implant anything, the 'cracker box' is the one attached to the TV cable/antenna

there are few that are still resisting. are they the new Uber-nerd black hats?</htmltext>
<tokenext>CNN , f-o-x got to some of us people .
... cant ..stop.. the BS .
and you do n't need to implant anything , the 'cracker box ' is the one attached to the TV cable/antenna there are few that are still resisting .
are they the new Uber-nerd black hats ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNN, f-o-x got to some of us people.
... cant ..stop.. the BS.
and you don't need to implant anything, the 'cracker box' is the one attached to the TV cable/antenna

there are few that are still resisting.
are they the new Uber-nerd black hats?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</id>
	<title>Here's a question...</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1247477580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If everyone could hack into any person's  brain and have sex with whoever they want, then what kind of society would that be like?  On one hand, some super hot chicks are going to be pretty busy, but on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone could hack into any person 's brain and have sex with whoever they want , then what kind of society would that be like ?
On one hand , some super hot chicks are going to be pretty busy , but on the other hand , you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone could hack into any person's  brain and have sex with whoever they want, then what kind of society would that be like?
On one hand, some super hot chicks are going to be pretty busy, but on the other hand, you would be reprogrammed periodically to think that bigfoot was hot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687705</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247562420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The power to control an amputee's osseointegrated prosthesis from afar and anonymously create havoc is something I think more than a few immature, irresponsible types might find too tempting to pass up. How moral is the typical kid who writes viruses, or steals CDs from a music store, or bashes in mailboxes with a baseball bat from a passing car? They do this shit out of sheer boredom sometimes, and the consequences just don't occur to them. Not even after they have reached adulthood and no longer have time to be bored. Croaking someone with a programmable pacemaker might not appeal to your average delinquent, but your average psychopath might get a real kick out of it. What kind of brain prostheses are we going to develop in the near future, say for people who suffer strokes, or people who have had severe head trauma? I've seen footage of a scientist steering a large rat down a university hallway with a wirelessly controlled brain implant that stimulated the portion of the rat's brain that processed whisker stimuli. They prodded the poor thing into motion by tickling it's 'pleasure center'. Now think about an implant designed to help a person who has had their sense of balance destroyed by illness or drug side-effects. What about feeding false signals into the auditory implants of a deaf person? Wouldn't it be hilarious to watch them whip around in panic looking for the stereo-panning, doppler-shifting car horn that isn't there?</p><p>Still think this is FUD now? Sorry Icebike, but your self-contented short-sightedness is making me grind my teeth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The power to control an amputee 's osseointegrated prosthesis from afar and anonymously create havoc is something I think more than a few immature , irresponsible types might find too tempting to pass up .
How moral is the typical kid who writes viruses , or steals CDs from a music store , or bashes in mailboxes with a baseball bat from a passing car ?
They do this shit out of sheer boredom sometimes , and the consequences just do n't occur to them .
Not even after they have reached adulthood and no longer have time to be bored .
Croaking someone with a programmable pacemaker might not appeal to your average delinquent , but your average psychopath might get a real kick out of it .
What kind of brain prostheses are we going to develop in the near future , say for people who suffer strokes , or people who have had severe head trauma ?
I 've seen footage of a scientist steering a large rat down a university hallway with a wirelessly controlled brain implant that stimulated the portion of the rat 's brain that processed whisker stimuli .
They prodded the poor thing into motion by tickling it 's 'pleasure center' .
Now think about an implant designed to help a person who has had their sense of balance destroyed by illness or drug side-effects .
What about feeding false signals into the auditory implants of a deaf person ?
Would n't it be hilarious to watch them whip around in panic looking for the stereo-panning , doppler-shifting car horn that is n't there ? Still think this is FUD now ?
Sorry Icebike , but your self-contented short-sightedness is making me grind my teeth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The power to control an amputee's osseointegrated prosthesis from afar and anonymously create havoc is something I think more than a few immature, irresponsible types might find too tempting to pass up.
How moral is the typical kid who writes viruses, or steals CDs from a music store, or bashes in mailboxes with a baseball bat from a passing car?
They do this shit out of sheer boredom sometimes, and the consequences just don't occur to them.
Not even after they have reached adulthood and no longer have time to be bored.
Croaking someone with a programmable pacemaker might not appeal to your average delinquent, but your average psychopath might get a real kick out of it.
What kind of brain prostheses are we going to develop in the near future, say for people who suffer strokes, or people who have had severe head trauma?
I've seen footage of a scientist steering a large rat down a university hallway with a wirelessly controlled brain implant that stimulated the portion of the rat's brain that processed whisker stimuli.
They prodded the poor thing into motion by tickling it's 'pleasure center'.
Now think about an implant designed to help a person who has had their sense of balance destroyed by illness or drug side-effects.
What about feeding false signals into the auditory implants of a deaf person?
Wouldn't it be hilarious to watch them whip around in panic looking for the stereo-panning, doppler-shifting car horn that isn't there?Still think this is FUD now?
Sorry Icebike, but your self-contented short-sightedness is making me grind my teeth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682973</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1247481000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can also ask why someone would post flashing images to the epilepsy foundations website <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/29/hackers-embed-flashing-animations-on-epilepsy-support-forum/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/29/hackers-embed-flashing-animations-on-epilepsy-support-forum/</a> [engadget.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also ask why someone would post flashing images to the epilepsy foundations website http : //www.engadget.com/2008/03/29/hackers-embed-flashing-animations-on-epilepsy-support-forum/ [ engadget.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also ask why someone would post flashing images to the epilepsy foundations website http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/29/hackers-embed-flashing-animations-on-epilepsy-support-forum/ [engadget.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682413</id>
	<title>I, for one...</title>
	<author>Narcocide</author>
	<datestamp>1247478780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... welcome our new zombie bot-net overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... welcome our new zombie bot-net overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... welcome our new zombie bot-net overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682169</id>
	<title>Ack, should have aimed this at 'Snow Crash'</title>
	<author>Xaedalus</author>
	<datestamp>1247477640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brain Hacking I can see happening (taking control of someone's bionics), but doing the mindwipe is what I was taking aim at. TFA talks about rats getting their memories wiped, but I'd want to know more. Does the rat's basic personality stay intact? Did the rat relearn? Did the rat display the same actions after the removal of the enzyme?

(That'll teach me to take a moment and think before typing - let this be a lesson to you!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain Hacking I can see happening ( taking control of someone 's bionics ) , but doing the mindwipe is what I was taking aim at .
TFA talks about rats getting their memories wiped , but I 'd want to know more .
Does the rat 's basic personality stay intact ?
Did the rat relearn ?
Did the rat display the same actions after the removal of the enzyme ?
( That 'll teach me to take a moment and think before typing - let this be a lesson to you !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain Hacking I can see happening (taking control of someone's bionics), but doing the mindwipe is what I was taking aim at.
TFA talks about rats getting their memories wiped, but I'd want to know more.
Does the rat's basic personality stay intact?
Did the rat relearn?
Did the rat display the same actions after the removal of the enzyme?
(That'll teach me to take a moment and think before typing - let this be a lesson to you!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561</id>
	<title>Why bother?</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1247479320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not worth hacking.</p><p>We talk a lot here about how Windows gets hacked more than Linux or Mac because it has a higher market share.</p><p>What's the market share on a prosthetic limb?</p><p>By the way, the style sheets are totally fucked up on IE6. Some of us aren't running nightly Firefox builds, morons. Try testing your code on various paltforms.</p><p>What? It's a managed work computer. It is what it is.</p><p>No, USB devices aren't permitted either, so Portable Firefox is out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not worth hacking.We talk a lot here about how Windows gets hacked more than Linux or Mac because it has a higher market share.What 's the market share on a prosthetic limb ? By the way , the style sheets are totally fucked up on IE6 .
Some of us are n't running nightly Firefox builds , morons .
Try testing your code on various paltforms.What ?
It 's a managed work computer .
It is what it is.No , USB devices are n't permitted either , so Portable Firefox is out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not worth hacking.We talk a lot here about how Windows gets hacked more than Linux or Mac because it has a higher market share.What's the market share on a prosthetic limb?By the way, the style sheets are totally fucked up on IE6.
Some of us aren't running nightly Firefox builds, morons.
Try testing your code on various paltforms.What?
It's a managed work computer.
It is what it is.No, USB devices aren't permitted either, so Portable Firefox is out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689115</id>
	<title>Life imitating art ... again</title>
	<author>Gonzo\_Warrior</author>
	<datestamp>1247577840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone here read "Synners" by Pat Cadigan? Remember: It's only impossible in the real world!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone here read " Synners " by Pat Cadigan ?
Remember : It 's only impossible in the real world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone here read "Synners" by Pat Cadigan?
Remember: It's only impossible in the real world!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685541</id>
	<title>I see the bright side:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247498760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally my own army of zombies, to take over the world!</p><p>Now all I need is a white cat and an iron glove. *MUHAHAHAHAAAA*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally my own army of zombies , to take over the world ! Now all I need is a white cat and an iron glove .
* MUHAHAHAHAAAA *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally my own army of zombies, to take over the world!Now all I need is a white cat and an iron glove.
*MUHAHAHAHAAAA*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682437</id>
	<title>One-way only please.</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1247478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I will not use any machine that changes the content of my brain. I will be happy to use artificial limbs and mind-controlled computers, but not mind-altering computers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I will not use any machine that changes the content of my brain .
I will be happy to use artificial limbs and mind-controlled computers , but not mind-altering computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I will not use any machine that changes the content of my brain.
I will be happy to use artificial limbs and mind-controlled computers, but not mind-altering computers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684977</id>
	<title>Nothing New Here....</title>
	<author>Marcos Eliziario</author>
	<datestamp>1247493000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hacking the braing has nothing of a novelty. Indeed, it's a common practice and have been used for decades with excelent results.<br>The only twist is that we do not call it brain hack. As scientists, we feel it too much a bit on the sensationalistic side of the fense.<br>Indeed, we use the widely academical-safe terms:</p><p>-Mass Media<br>-Advertising<br>-Propaganda</p><p>And with *Paranoia*(TM) we can even get people to do the job of getting info from their neighbour's mind and fetch us the results. But Paranoia(TM)is currently more being sold at our Federal Systems Division. Our busines customers user prefer tracking their subjects emails and search results.</p><p>Prof Dr. DooNooEvil, PhD<br>Researcher with a Larry Brin Fellowship at MIT<br>Distinguished Senior Scientist<br>Google Inc.<br>Also Serving as Chair Member of several of Your Favourites Friendly Media Monsters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking the braing has nothing of a novelty .
Indeed , it 's a common practice and have been used for decades with excelent results.The only twist is that we do not call it brain hack .
As scientists , we feel it too much a bit on the sensationalistic side of the fense.Indeed , we use the widely academical-safe terms : -Mass Media-Advertising-PropagandaAnd with * Paranoia * ( TM ) we can even get people to do the job of getting info from their neighbour 's mind and fetch us the results .
But Paranoia ( TM ) is currently more being sold at our Federal Systems Division .
Our busines customers user prefer tracking their subjects emails and search results.Prof Dr. DooNooEvil , PhDResearcher with a Larry Brin Fellowship at MITDistinguished Senior ScientistGoogle Inc.Also Serving as Chair Member of several of Your Favourites Friendly Media Monsters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking the braing has nothing of a novelty.
Indeed, it's a common practice and have been used for decades with excelent results.The only twist is that we do not call it brain hack.
As scientists, we feel it too much a bit on the sensationalistic side of the fense.Indeed, we use the widely academical-safe terms:-Mass Media-Advertising-PropagandaAnd with *Paranoia*(TM) we can even get people to do the job of getting info from their neighbour's mind and fetch us the results.
But Paranoia(TM)is currently more being sold at our Federal Systems Division.
Our busines customers user prefer tracking their subjects emails and search results.Prof Dr. DooNooEvil, PhDResearcher with a Larry Brin Fellowship at MITDistinguished Senior ScientistGoogle Inc.Also Serving as Chair Member of several of Your Favourites Friendly Media Monsters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683259</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247482320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So yeah, let's say you have such an appendage.  Someone gains control of it, makes you grab a gun and point it at your own head, or even someone else's, and says "give me all your money."  That's a start...  Now let's say it escalates to the point where decision making may be controlled, and now you don't even need to be tricked into wiring money to that account for that "Nigerian royalty."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So yeah , let 's say you have such an appendage .
Someone gains control of it , makes you grab a gun and point it at your own head , or even someone else 's , and says " give me all your money .
" That 's a start... Now let 's say it escalates to the point where decision making may be controlled , and now you do n't even need to be tricked into wiring money to that account for that " Nigerian royalty .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So yeah, let's say you have such an appendage.
Someone gains control of it, makes you grab a gun and point it at your own head, or even someone else's, and says "give me all your money.
"  That's a start...  Now let's say it escalates to the point where decision making may be controlled, and now you don't even need to be tricked into wiring money to that account for that "Nigerian royalty.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682423</id>
	<title>Hacker Bullies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...taking over some wimpy kid's prosthetic arm..."Stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself!..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...taking over some wimpy kid 's prosthetic arm... " Stop hitting yourself !
Stop hitting yourself !
Stop hitting yourself ! .. .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...taking over some wimpy kid's prosthetic arm..."Stop hitting yourself!
Stop hitting yourself!
Stop hitting yourself!...
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682503</id>
	<title>Just don't let Nelson Muntz get a hold of this</title>
	<author>mattlmattlmattl</author>
	<datestamp>1247479080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop hitting yourself!  Why are you hitting yourself?  Stop hitting yourself!</p><p>(For The Simpson's impaired, Nelson is a bully, prone to making people hit themselves.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop hitting yourself !
Why are you hitting yourself ?
Stop hitting yourself !
( For The Simpson 's impaired , Nelson is a bully , prone to making people hit themselves .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop hitting yourself!
Why are you hitting yourself?
Stop hitting yourself!
(For The Simpson's impaired, Nelson is a bully, prone to making people hit themselves.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685693</id>
	<title>Future Husband Excuse...</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1247499720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But honey, it wasn't really me!  Someone hacked into my brain and *MADE* me do that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But honey , it was n't really me !
Someone hacked into my brain and * MADE * me do that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But honey, it wasn't really me!
Someone hacked into my brain and *MADE* me do that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682821</id>
	<title>Cutter... come in Cutter!</title>
	<author>TheRealMindChild</author>
	<datestamp>1247480460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm tracking other movements in the tunnel. LOCK AND LOAD!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm tracking other movements in the tunnel .
LOCK AND LOAD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm tracking other movements in the tunnel.
LOCK AND LOAD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684233</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Fallen Seraph</author>
	<datestamp>1247487900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm, no, it really doesn't. Even if we do have a "soul," it has no known effect on how our bodies function. There are, however, records of people's personalities and memories having changed due to brain trauma and chemical alteration. Additionally, the "soul" has nothing to do with your body's motor control. We KNOW that electrical impulses control our limbs, we can trigger them, it's how a defibrillator works.
<br> <br>
So exactly what part of this would the "soul" prevent from taking place?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm , no , it really does n't .
Even if we do have a " soul , " it has no known effect on how our bodies function .
There are , however , records of people 's personalities and memories having changed due to brain trauma and chemical alteration .
Additionally , the " soul " has nothing to do with your body 's motor control .
We KNOW that electrical impulses control our limbs , we can trigger them , it 's how a defibrillator works .
So exactly what part of this would the " soul " prevent from taking place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm, no, it really doesn't.
Even if we do have a "soul," it has no known effect on how our bodies function.
There are, however, records of people's personalities and memories having changed due to brain trauma and chemical alteration.
Additionally, the "soul" has nothing to do with your body's motor control.
We KNOW that electrical impulses control our limbs, we can trigger them, it's how a defibrillator works.
So exactly what part of this would the "soul" prevent from taking place?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685611</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I find government and company drones much worse. You know: That kind that could be replaced by a very small shell script, because all they do is follow rules. As exact as possible. And with no flexibility at all. Even if this means doing the exact opposite of the original intent of the rule.</p><p>Also when you state a free question, you only get a blank stare and you can basically see the internal "command or pattern not found" error message. Then you have to re-state your question, until they detect some pattern of meaning, that hey have an association for. Which means they run the interrupt handler routine, and then wait for the next input.<br>I have seen this exact behavior so many times, with post office, phone company, supermarket security, and most dangerously local government employees, it's not even funny anymore.</p><p>But I gave up opening their minds again. I instead switched to taking them over, so that they at least work for the good side. (Me of course.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I find government and company drones much worse .
You know : That kind that could be replaced by a very small shell script , because all they do is follow rules .
As exact as possible .
And with no flexibility at all .
Even if this means doing the exact opposite of the original intent of the rule.Also when you state a free question , you only get a blank stare and you can basically see the internal " command or pattern not found " error message .
Then you have to re-state your question , until they detect some pattern of meaning , that hey have an association for .
Which means they run the interrupt handler routine , and then wait for the next input.I have seen this exact behavior so many times , with post office , phone company , supermarket security , and most dangerously local government employees , it 's not even funny anymore.But I gave up opening their minds again .
I instead switched to taking them over , so that they at least work for the good side .
( Me of course .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I find government and company drones much worse.
You know: That kind that could be replaced by a very small shell script, because all they do is follow rules.
As exact as possible.
And with no flexibility at all.
Even if this means doing the exact opposite of the original intent of the rule.Also when you state a free question, you only get a blank stare and you can basically see the internal "command or pattern not found" error message.
Then you have to re-state your question, until they detect some pattern of meaning, that hey have an association for.
Which means they run the interrupt handler routine, and then wait for the next input.I have seen this exact behavior so many times, with post office, phone company, supermarket security, and most dangerously local government employees, it's not even funny anymore.But I gave up opening their minds again.
I instead switched to taking them over, so that they at least work for the good side.
(Me of course.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682677</id>
	<title>Slashdot: News For Fascists Stuff That Represses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On behalf of several members of the community, I would like to express my shock and disappointment at some of Richard B Cheney's epigrams. For openers, Cheney has no fixed ethical principles. I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. I try never to argue with him because it's clear he's not susceptible to reason. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because Cheney frequently engages in violent fantasies involving abysmal ninnies. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem. Why am I furious? Because I've heard him say that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Cheney secretly trying to permit nettlesome ratbags to rise to positions of leadership and authority? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of unpleasant speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations&#226;"and that's just the short list! And why am I embarrassed? Because his prophecies are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that Cheney's lackeys once used to cause an increase in disease, nepotism, crime, and vice.</p><p>By writing this letter, I am really sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Cheney will retaliate against me. He'll most likely try to force me to have a nervous breakdown although another possibility is that he is secretly planning to cause unholy subversion to gather momentum on college campuses. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that if Cheney thinks that he can make me lose heart then he's barking up the wrong tree. It is no accident that the cure for corruption, conspiracy, and treason must start by exposing the problem to people who care and are not themselves corrupted. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion.</p><p>Cheney will spew forth ignorance and prejudice long before he can convert me into one of his zealots. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Cheney had learned anything from history, he'd know that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less tactless than Cheney. We can say that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Cheney with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by picayunish drug lords, and Cheney can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. I want to give people more information about Cheney, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I undoubtedly hope people draw: Cheney's allegations are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature. The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Cheney is totally reprehensible. We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve.</p><p>In a sense, if we are to place a high value on honor and self-respect, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the churlish and heinous ideologies that Cheney promotes. We must provide a trenchant analysis of his conclusions. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility&#226;"a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that I do n</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On behalf of several members of the community , I would like to express my shock and disappointment at some of Richard B Cheney 's epigrams .
For openers , Cheney has no fixed ethical principles .
I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise .
I try never to argue with him because it 's clear he 's not susceptible to reason .
I am hurt , furious , and embarrassed .
Why am I hurt ?
Because Cheney frequently engages in violent fantasies involving abysmal ninnies .
That concept can be extended , mutatis mutandis , to the way that if you 're not part of the solution then you 're part of the problem .
Why am I furious ?
Because I 've heard him say that children do n't need as much psychological attentiveness , protection , and obedience training as the treasured household pet .
Was that just a slip of the lip , or is Cheney secretly trying to permit nettlesome ratbags to rise to positions of leadership and authority ?
I 'll tell you what I think the answer is .
I ca n't prove it , but if I 'm correct , events soon will prove me right .
I think that he is careless with data , makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification , has a way of combining disparate ideas that do n't seem to hang together , seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases , gets into all sorts of unpleasant speculation , and then makes no effort to test out his speculations   " and that 's just the short list !
And why am I embarrassed ?
Because his prophecies are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of " tradition " .
Funny , that was the same term that Cheney 's lackeys once used to cause an increase in disease , nepotism , crime , and vice.By writing this letter , I am really sticking my head far above the parapet .
The big danger is that Cheney will retaliate against me .
He 'll most likely try to force me to have a nervous breakdown although another possibility is that he is secretly planning to cause unholy subversion to gather momentum on college campuses .
I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people , which is why you need to understand that if Cheney thinks that he can make me lose heart then he 's barking up the wrong tree .
It is no accident that the cure for corruption , conspiracy , and treason must start by exposing the problem to people who care and are not themselves corrupted .
History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion.Cheney will spew forth ignorance and prejudice long before he can convert me into one of his zealots .
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it .
Of course , if Cheney had learned anything from history , he 'd know that if I withheld my feelings on this matter , I 'd be no less tactless than Cheney .
We can say that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Cheney with new eyes , unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by picayunish drug lords , and Cheney can claim the opposite , and it wo n't make one bit of difference .
I want to give people more information about Cheney , help them digest and assimilate and understand that information , and help them draw responsible conclusions from it .
Here 's one conclusion I undoubtedly hope people draw : Cheney 's allegations are like a Hydra .
They continually acquire new heads and new strength .
The only way to stunt their growth is to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature .
The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Cheney is totally reprehensible .
We all are , to some extent , but he sets the curve.In a sense , if we are to place a high value on honor and self-respect , then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology , not by the churlish and heinous ideologies that Cheney promotes .
We must provide a trenchant analysis of his conclusions .
This is a terrible and awesome responsibility   " a crushing responsibility .
However , if we stick together we can can show the world that I do n</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On behalf of several members of the community, I would like to express my shock and disappointment at some of Richard B Cheney's epigrams.
For openers, Cheney has no fixed ethical principles.
I challenge him to move from his broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise.
I try never to argue with him because it's clear he's not susceptible to reason.
I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed.
Why am I hurt?
Because Cheney frequently engages in violent fantasies involving abysmal ninnies.
That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.
Why am I furious?
Because I've heard him say that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet.
Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Cheney secretly trying to permit nettlesome ratbags to rise to positions of leadership and authority?
I'll tell you what I think the answer is.
I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right.
I think that he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of unpleasant speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculationsâ"and that's just the short list!
And why am I embarrassed?
Because his prophecies are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition".
Funny, that was the same term that Cheney's lackeys once used to cause an increase in disease, nepotism, crime, and vice.By writing this letter, I am really sticking my head far above the parapet.
The big danger is that Cheney will retaliate against me.
He'll most likely try to force me to have a nervous breakdown although another possibility is that he is secretly planning to cause unholy subversion to gather momentum on college campuses.
I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that if Cheney thinks that he can make me lose heart then he's barking up the wrong tree.
It is no accident that the cure for corruption, conspiracy, and treason must start by exposing the problem to people who care and are not themselves corrupted.
History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion.Cheney will spew forth ignorance and prejudice long before he can convert me into one of his zealots.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Of course, if Cheney had learned anything from history, he'd know that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less tactless than Cheney.
We can say that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Cheney with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by picayunish drug lords, and Cheney can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference.
I want to give people more information about Cheney, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it.
Here's one conclusion I undoubtedly hope people draw: Cheney's allegations are like a Hydra.
They continually acquire new heads and new strength.
The only way to stunt their growth is to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature.
The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that Cheney is totally reprehensible.
We all are, to some extent, but he sets the curve.In a sense, if we are to place a high value on honor and self-respect, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the churlish and heinous ideologies that Cheney promotes.
We must provide a trenchant analysis of his conclusions.
This is a terrible and awesome responsibilityâ"a crushing responsibility.
However, if we stick together we can can show the world that I do n</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682369</id>
	<title>Antivirus software installed in your brain</title>
	<author>FunPika</author>
	<datestamp>1247478600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At this rate it may have to happen some day.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>At this rate it may have to happen some day .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At this rate it may have to happen some day.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682189</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>ocularDeathRay</author>
	<datestamp>1247477700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>you might be right, but I am building a new tin foil hat just to be sure.
<br> <br>
1. after all in Soviet Russia tin foil makes people into hats
2.
3. profit!
<br> <br>
you must be new here, and so on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you might be right , but I am building a new tin foil hat just to be sure .
1. after all in Soviet Russia tin foil makes people into hats 2 .
3. profit !
you must be new here , and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you might be right, but I am building a new tin foil hat just to be sure.
1. after all in Soviet Russia tin foil makes people into hats
2.
3. profit!
you must be new here, and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684149</id>
	<title>It has existed for millennia</title>
	<author>orkysoft</author>
	<datestamp>1247487240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes people believe absurdities, and commit atrocities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes people believe absurdities , and commit atrocities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes people believe absurdities, and commit atrocities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685331</id>
	<title>GITS.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dunno if anyone else has posted this but.<br>Ghost. In. The. Shell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno if anyone else has posted this but.Ghost .
In. The .
Shell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno if anyone else has posted this but.Ghost.
In. The.
Shell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107</id>
	<title>a risk I'm willing to take</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1247477340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it means that in the future our government will employ cyber-babes in ridiculous fuck-me outfits to fight crime.</p><p>(Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it means that in the future our government will employ cyber-babes in ridiculous fuck-me outfits to fight crime .
( Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it means that in the future our government will employ cyber-babes in ridiculous fuck-me outfits to fight crime.
(Still finding it ridiculous that the Major was essentially wearing a one-piece bathing suit and leather jacket as her uniform in the GITS tv series.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682199</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless your soul is akin to say, Symantec or Norton's virus protection for your brain..  there to make you feel good, but utterly useless for real world application.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless your soul is akin to say , Symantec or Norton 's virus protection for your brain.. there to make you feel good , but utterly useless for real world application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless your soul is akin to say, Symantec or Norton's virus protection for your brain..  there to make you feel good, but utterly useless for real world application.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682637</id>
	<title>Thia week on sci-fi brain hacks</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1247479680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thia week on sci-fi brain hacks.</p><p>This sounds like something out of a b-movie and it seems like stuff like this has been done / done in parts in many b movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thia week on sci-fi brain hacks.This sounds like something out of a b-movie and it seems like stuff like this has been done / done in parts in many b movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thia week on sci-fi brain hacks.This sounds like something out of a b-movie and it seems like stuff like this has been done / done in parts in many b movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</id>
	<title>Encryption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go insane. It's the new encryption.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go insane .
It 's the new encryption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go insane.
It's the new encryption.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682283</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a question...</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1247478180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If everyone could hack into any person's brain and have sex with whoever they want, then what kind of society would that be like?</p></div><p>A society of puppeteering sociopaths. Not too much different from what we have today, except that everybody would be equally powerful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone could hack into any person 's brain and have sex with whoever they want , then what kind of society would that be like ? A society of puppeteering sociopaths .
Not too much different from what we have today , except that everybody would be equally powerful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone could hack into any person's brain and have sex with whoever they want, then what kind of society would that be like?A society of puppeteering sociopaths.
Not too much different from what we have today, except that everybody would be equally powerful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686767</id>
	<title>Surrogates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247507880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually this article reminded me of a movie i saw a trailer for a while ago, Surrogates. think it had bruce willis. anyway for those who don't know about it its about a world where everyone lives thier lives through prosthetic bodies, ran from thier home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually this article reminded me of a movie i saw a trailer for a while ago , Surrogates .
think it had bruce willis .
anyway for those who do n't know about it its about a world where everyone lives thier lives through prosthetic bodies , ran from thier home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually this article reminded me of a movie i saw a trailer for a while ago, Surrogates.
think it had bruce willis.
anyway for those who don't know about it its about a world where everyone lives thier lives through prosthetic bodies, ran from thier home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682969</id>
	<title>So, it can finally be said legitimately...</title>
	<author>m93</author>
	<datestamp>1247480940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
<br>
tinfoil hat, anyone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>tinfoil hat , anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

tinfoil hat, anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682647</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>galfridus73</author>
	<datestamp>1247479740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First to mention it, yes, but I immediately thought of ghost hacking when I read the headline.

When external memory is feasible then I'll start wondering where my electronic eyes and basset hound are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First to mention it , yes , but I immediately thought of ghost hacking when I read the headline .
When external memory is feasible then I 'll start wondering where my electronic eyes and basset hound are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First to mention it, yes, but I immediately thought of ghost hacking when I read the headline.
When external memory is feasible then I'll start wondering where my electronic eyes and basset hound are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684525</id>
	<title>Mandatory "I for one" comment</title>
	<author>Hamoohead</author>
	<datestamp>1247489580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our "making the guy with a prosthesis next to you jack off" overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our " making the guy with a prosthesis next to you jack off " overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our "making the guy with a prosthesis next to you jack off" overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684549</id>
	<title>sounds like...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247489700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this sounds like <a href="http://phrack.org/" title="phrack.org" rel="nofollow">http://phrack.org/</a> [phrack.org]phr4ck [phr4ck megazine] hack your brain...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this sounds like http : //phrack.org/ [ phrack.org ] phr4ck [ phr4ck megazine ] hack your brain.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this sounds like http://phrack.org/ [phrack.org]phr4ck [phr4ck megazine] hack your brain...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211</id>
	<title>Re:No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>kannibal\_klown</author>
	<datestamp>1247477820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Okay, this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming. If we actually do have a soul, then this whole idea goes out the window (and a whole lot of other, much bigger problems come in).</p></div><p>I don't see how the soul comes into play here.</p><p>Correct me if I'm wrong (I have ZERO medical background), but throughout the years there have been examples of conditioned responses and hypnotism.  Then there is shock therapy and some drugs to help wipe some thoughts and memories, and let's not forget about sleepwalking and sleepdriving.</p><p>If a person gets amnesia, does that mean the soul has left the body?<br>If a person sleepwalks due to a personal problem or a medication reaction, does that mean during that time there is no soul?<br>etc</p><p>Given enough time and advancement, who's to say that in 100 years that either a combination of the above couldn't take control of a person and wipe their memory afterwards.  Especially once we start wiring hackable devices into our nervous system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming .
If we actually do have a soul , then this whole idea goes out the window ( and a whole lot of other , much bigger problems come in ) .I do n't see how the soul comes into play here.Correct me if I 'm wrong ( I have ZERO medical background ) , but throughout the years there have been examples of conditioned responses and hypnotism .
Then there is shock therapy and some drugs to help wipe some thoughts and memories , and let 's not forget about sleepwalking and sleepdriving.If a person gets amnesia , does that mean the soul has left the body ? If a person sleepwalks due to a personal problem or a medication reaction , does that mean during that time there is no soul ? etcGiven enough time and advancement , who 's to say that in 100 years that either a combination of the above could n't take control of a person and wipe their memory afterwards .
Especially once we start wiring hackable devices into our nervous system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming.
If we actually do have a soul, then this whole idea goes out the window (and a whole lot of other, much bigger problems come in).I don't see how the soul comes into play here.Correct me if I'm wrong (I have ZERO medical background), but throughout the years there have been examples of conditioned responses and hypnotism.
Then there is shock therapy and some drugs to help wipe some thoughts and memories, and let's not forget about sleepwalking and sleepdriving.If a person gets amnesia, does that mean the soul has left the body?If a person sleepwalks due to a personal problem or a medication reaction, does that mean during that time there is no soul?etcGiven enough time and advancement, who's to say that in 100 years that either a combination of the above couldn't take control of a person and wipe their memory afterwards.
Especially once we start wiring hackable devices into our nervous system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686025</id>
	<title>Voicebox Tapping</title>
	<author>meridian</author>
	<datestamp>1247502000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it is possible that one of the first "brain hacking" technologies will actually be to do with the voicebox as this will likely be simpler than working out different peoples brain structures.<br>

Everyones voicebox works essentially the same and when thinking words signals are sent to the voicebox that are the same as but not as strong as the sigtnals used to cause speech.<br>

Nasa already have this working for astronauts for speechless communication in space. See <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4539" title="dailytech.com">here</a> [dailytech.com] <br>

I think technologies to be able to monitor human thought to be quite scarey and quite useful at the same time. A device that could be placed inside someones throat and self powered somehow may be a deffinate big brother style thing, but it would be great to see this used for good purposes such as monitoring what politicians think when creating laws in parliment.<br>

It just depends on the application.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is possible that one of the first " brain hacking " technologies will actually be to do with the voicebox as this will likely be simpler than working out different peoples brain structures .
Everyones voicebox works essentially the same and when thinking words signals are sent to the voicebox that are the same as but not as strong as the sigtnals used to cause speech .
Nasa already have this working for astronauts for speechless communication in space .
See here [ dailytech.com ] I think technologies to be able to monitor human thought to be quite scarey and quite useful at the same time .
A device that could be placed inside someones throat and self powered somehow may be a deffinate big brother style thing , but it would be great to see this used for good purposes such as monitoring what politicians think when creating laws in parliment .
It just depends on the application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is possible that one of the first "brain hacking" technologies will actually be to do with the voicebox as this will likely be simpler than working out different peoples brain structures.
Everyones voicebox works essentially the same and when thinking words signals are sent to the voicebox that are the same as but not as strong as the sigtnals used to cause speech.
Nasa already have this working for astronauts for speechless communication in space.
See here [dailytech.com] 

I think technologies to be able to monitor human thought to be quite scarey and quite useful at the same time.
A device that could be placed inside someones throat and self powered somehow may be a deffinate big brother style thing, but it would be great to see this used for good purposes such as monitoring what politicians think when creating laws in parliment.
It just depends on the application.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682509</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You beat me to it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You beat me to it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You beat me to it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682725</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1247480040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What money is there in vandalism? None.</p><p>The answer of your question of why anybody would do this: because they can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What money is there in vandalism ?
None.The answer of your question of why anybody would do this : because they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What money is there in vandalism?
None.The answer of your question of why anybody would do this: because they can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688667</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>rizole</author>
	<datestamp>1247573400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First they hacked the mechanical legs. I did not protest for I have no mechanical legs. <br>
Then they hacked the mechanical hands. I did not protest for I have no mechanical hands. <br>
Then they hacked the mechanical spines and I did not protest for I have no mechanical spine. <br>
Then they hacked the mechanical jaws and I still did not protest for I had a mechanical jaw.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First they hacked the mechanical legs .
I did not protest for I have no mechanical legs .
Then they hacked the mechanical hands .
I did not protest for I have no mechanical hands .
Then they hacked the mechanical spines and I did not protest for I have no mechanical spine .
Then they hacked the mechanical jaws and I still did not protest for I had a mechanical jaw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they hacked the mechanical legs.
I did not protest for I have no mechanical legs.
Then they hacked the mechanical hands.
I did not protest for I have no mechanical hands.
Then they hacked the mechanical spines and I did not protest for I have no mechanical spine.
Then they hacked the mechanical jaws and I still did not protest for I had a mechanical jaw.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683915</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>XnavxeMiyyep</author>
	<datestamp>1247485980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Opera, I've found that if you view the comments.pl page for stories (the one without the summary at the top) the comments' stylesheets look much better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Opera , I 've found that if you view the comments.pl page for stories ( the one without the summary at the top ) the comments ' stylesheets look much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Opera, I've found that if you view the comments.pl page for stories (the one without the summary at the top) the comments' stylesheets look much better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683983</id>
	<title>Brain Hacking has been going on for a long time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247486400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's usually called "religion."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's usually called " religion .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's usually called "religion.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683327</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>euxneks</author>
	<datestamp>1247482620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?</p></div></blockquote><p>Notoriety..?<br>"Oh, that guy, he's the one designed that prosthetic limb worm... You know, the virus that made prosthetic limbs wiggle around?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , for pete sake people , what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg ? Notoriety.. ?
" Oh , that guy , he 's the one designed that prosthetic limb worm... You know , the virus that made prosthetic limbs wiggle around ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, for pete sake people, what possible gain would there be in trying to break into a mechanical leg?Notoriety..?
"Oh, that guy, he's the one designed that prosthetic limb worm... You know, the virus that made prosthetic limbs wiggle around?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683291</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1247482440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does a neural interface suggest a 'mine whipe'? (SIC)</p><p>It doesn't. But your question strongly suggests that you didn't RTFA. The topic is hacking wetware, and there are two distinct branches: hacking the wireless interfaces to implanted devices EG prosthetics, and a completely chilling (terrifying?) account of chemical uses that very effectively erase your memories... forever.</p><p>Seriously - RTFA! Where today we have mysterious 'suicides' we may soon find accounts of amnesia rapidly on-the-rise among (former) dissidents. Orwell's 1984 taken to a whole new extreme. I, for one, am praying for the Dollhouse where I can back up my brain image.......</p><p>Kurzweil? You listening?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does a neural interface suggest a 'mine whipe ' ?
( SIC ) It does n't .
But your question strongly suggests that you did n't RTFA .
The topic is hacking wetware , and there are two distinct branches : hacking the wireless interfaces to implanted devices EG prosthetics , and a completely chilling ( terrifying ?
) account of chemical uses that very effectively erase your memories... forever.Seriously - RTFA !
Where today we have mysterious 'suicides ' we may soon find accounts of amnesia rapidly on-the-rise among ( former ) dissidents .
Orwell 's 1984 taken to a whole new extreme .
I , for one , am praying for the Dollhouse where I can back up my brain image.......Kurzweil ?
You listening ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does a neural interface suggest a 'mine whipe'?
(SIC)It doesn't.
But your question strongly suggests that you didn't RTFA.
The topic is hacking wetware, and there are two distinct branches: hacking the wireless interfaces to implanted devices EG prosthetics, and a completely chilling (terrifying?
) account of chemical uses that very effectively erase your memories... forever.Seriously - RTFA!
Where today we have mysterious 'suicides' we may soon find accounts of amnesia rapidly on-the-rise among (former) dissidents.
Orwell's 1984 taken to a whole new extreme.
I, for one, am praying for the Dollhouse where I can back up my brain image.......Kurzweil?
You listening?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089</id>
	<title>No... not buying this at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming. If we actually do have a soul, then this whole idea goes out the window (and a whole lot of other, much bigger problems come in).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming .
If we actually do have a soul , then this whole idea goes out the window ( and a whole lot of other , much bigger problems come in ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, this only holds true IF we are truly biological machines with advanced programming.
If we actually do have a soul, then this whole idea goes out the window (and a whole lot of other, much bigger problems come in).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684103</id>
	<title>Re:Encryption ....Piece of Mind</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1247486940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Peace of Mind. Now, if they get into our minds, they'll in-load "Vysyooalyze whyrled peaz", and we'll become the living pea-brains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Peace of Mind .
Now , if they get into our minds , they 'll in-load " Vysyooalyze whyrled peaz " , and we 'll become the living pea-brains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peace of Mind.
Now, if they get into our minds, they'll in-load "Vysyooalyze whyrled peaz", and we'll become the living pea-brains.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682141</id>
	<title>awesome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247477520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God you guys are predictable and boring. "Security issues".<br>Never mind the security issues, look at the comedy potential for the Nelson Muntzes of the future!<br>"Hey prosthetic boy, stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God you guys are predictable and boring .
" Security issues " .Never mind the security issues , look at the comedy potential for the Nelson Muntzes of the future !
" Hey prosthetic boy , stop hitting yourself !
Stop hitting yourself !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God you guys are predictable and boring.
"Security issues".Never mind the security issues, look at the comedy potential for the Nelson Muntzes of the future!
"Hey prosthetic boy, stop hitting yourself!
Stop hitting yourself!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683427</id>
	<title>Re:Future FUD Fantastic</title>
	<author>Landshark17</author>
	<datestamp>1247482980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Feasability aside, just because there's no financial benefit to doing something doesn't mean people won't do it. Some people just like a challenge or see personal benefits in deconstructing things. If I lost a limb and had it replaced with a mind-controlled prosthetic, I'd probably hack it for fun just to see how it worked.<br> <br>On the flip side, some people are just sadistic enough to do things for the sake of torturing people. Remember when that girl died in car accident a few months back and people started emailing the leaked photos of her mangled body to her dad? There was no financial benefit to that, but it happened. Imagine the kind of people who did that with access to somebody's prosthetic limb. Can you say, "Stop hitting yourself?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Feasability aside , just because there 's no financial benefit to doing something does n't mean people wo n't do it .
Some people just like a challenge or see personal benefits in deconstructing things .
If I lost a limb and had it replaced with a mind-controlled prosthetic , I 'd probably hack it for fun just to see how it worked .
On the flip side , some people are just sadistic enough to do things for the sake of torturing people .
Remember when that girl died in car accident a few months back and people started emailing the leaked photos of her mangled body to her dad ?
There was no financial benefit to that , but it happened .
Imagine the kind of people who did that with access to somebody 's prosthetic limb .
Can you say , " Stop hitting yourself ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feasability aside, just because there's no financial benefit to doing something doesn't mean people won't do it.
Some people just like a challenge or see personal benefits in deconstructing things.
If I lost a limb and had it replaced with a mind-controlled prosthetic, I'd probably hack it for fun just to see how it worked.
On the flip side, some people are just sadistic enough to do things for the sake of torturing people.
Remember when that girl died in car accident a few months back and people started emailing the leaked photos of her mangled body to her dad?
There was no financial benefit to that, but it happened.
Imagine the kind of people who did that with access to somebody's prosthetic limb.
Can you say, "Stop hitting yourself?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683161</id>
	<title>Re:Don't need electronics to hack someones brain</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1247481720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Much like how gas prices of over $2/gallon are just fine now, because we went to $4+ a gallon for a short time.</p><p>Every time someone complains about gas prices now, everyone says, "At least it's not $4+ a gallon again!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much like how gas prices of over $ 2/gallon are just fine now , because we went to $ 4 + a gallon for a short time.Every time someone complains about gas prices now , everyone says , " At least it 's not $ 4 + a gallon again !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much like how gas prices of over $2/gallon are just fine now, because we went to $4+ a gallon for a short time.Every time someone complains about gas prices now, everyone says, "At least it's not $4+ a gallon again!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28694057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28691221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1811256_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682169
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682713
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683045
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683915
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682369
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683477
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682991
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28691221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28685701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28694057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28686309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28689573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682731
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28690725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28687881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28688985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28684103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1811256.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28682439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1811256.28683545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
