<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_13_1310215</id>
	<title>Analyst, 15, Creates Storm After Trashing Twitter</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1247491140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Barence</a> writes <i>"A 15-year-old schoolboy has become an overnight sensation after writing a report on <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/261280/15yearold-analyst-sparks-storm-after-trashing-twitter.html">teenagers' media habits for analysts Morgan Stanley</a>. Intern Matthew Robson was asked to write a report about his friends' use of technology during his work experience stint with the firm's media analysts. The report was so good the firm decided to publish it, and it generated 'five or six' times more interest than Morgan Stanley's regular reports. The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter, claiming that teenagers 'realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless.' He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " A 15-year-old schoolboy has become an overnight sensation after writing a report on teenagers ' media habits for analysts Morgan Stanley .
Intern Matthew Robson was asked to write a report about his friends ' use of technology during his work experience stint with the firm 's media analysts .
The report was so good the firm decided to publish it , and it generated 'five or six ' times more interest than Morgan Stanley 's regular reports .
The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter , claiming that teenagers 'realize that no one is viewing their profile , so their tweets are pointless .
' He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "A 15-year-old schoolboy has become an overnight sensation after writing a report on teenagers' media habits for analysts Morgan Stanley.
Intern Matthew Robson was asked to write a report about his friends' use of technology during his work experience stint with the firm's media analysts.
The report was so good the firm decided to publish it, and it generated 'five or six' times more interest than Morgan Stanley's regular reports.
The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter, claiming that teenagers 'realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless.
' He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28692075</id>
	<title>Re:He's just poor</title>
	<author>Ynsats</author>
	<datestamp>1247590800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did read the report and I don't care about cost. I find it amusing that all the other bashers of Twitter, which is a waste of time, completely, get bashed and dismissed for their views. Yet a 15 year old kid says it's not such a great idea and all of a sudden it's like Jesus moved the rock.</p><p>So take your knee-jerk reaction and shove up your rear 'cause it's obvious you didn't even read my post. If you did, then you didn't understand it because you missed the point entirely.</p><p>Thanks for playing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did read the report and I do n't care about cost .
I find it amusing that all the other bashers of Twitter , which is a waste of time , completely , get bashed and dismissed for their views .
Yet a 15 year old kid says it 's not such a great idea and all of a sudden it 's like Jesus moved the rock.So take your knee-jerk reaction and shove up your rear 'cause it 's obvious you did n't even read my post .
If you did , then you did n't understand it because you missed the point entirely.Thanks for playing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did read the report and I don't care about cost.
I find it amusing that all the other bashers of Twitter, which is a waste of time, completely, get bashed and dismissed for their views.
Yet a 15 year old kid says it's not such a great idea and all of a sudden it's like Jesus moved the rock.So take your knee-jerk reaction and shove up your rear 'cause it's obvious you didn't even read my post.
If you did, then you didn't understand it because you missed the point entirely.Thanks for playing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675359</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>rho</author>
	<datestamp>1247495940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.</p></div></blockquote><p>Thing about 10 year olds, they don't stay that way. These kinds of reports are what people and corporations use to plan for the future.

</p><p>I'm not suggesting that the report is the end-all be-all, but it does hint that maybe what people today are terribly excited about today may not be sustainable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe for 10 year olds , but certainly not for the rest of us.Thing about 10 year olds , they do n't stay that way .
These kinds of reports are what people and corporations use to plan for the future .
I 'm not suggesting that the report is the end-all be-all , but it does hint that maybe what people today are terribly excited about today may not be sustainable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.Thing about 10 year olds, they don't stay that way.
These kinds of reports are what people and corporations use to plan for the future.
I'm not suggesting that the report is the end-all be-all, but it does hint that maybe what people today are terribly excited about today may not be sustainable.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678663</id>
	<title>I do this all the time!</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1247507940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, I write detailed analysis with "get off of my lawn" style criticisms of social networking sites, Web 2.0, Twitter, video games, music, etc, and yet the only "fame" I ever get is thousands of "FUCK YOU, YOUR WRONG!" comments...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I write detailed analysis with " get off of my lawn " style criticisms of social networking sites , Web 2.0 , Twitter , video games , music , etc , and yet the only " fame " I ever get is thousands of " FUCK YOU , YOUR WRONG !
" comments.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I write detailed analysis with "get off of my lawn" style criticisms of social networking sites, Web 2.0, Twitter, video games, music, etc, and yet the only "fame" I ever get is thousands of "FUCK YOU, YOUR WRONG!
" comments...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177</id>
	<title>Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Texting is hard!

<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting" title="gizmodo.com" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting</a> [gizmodo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Texting is hard !
http : //gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Texting is hard!
http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting [gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675701</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>webreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1247497620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, he's only 15. He might be working for MS, but perhaps he hasn't scored highly in his English SATS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , he 's only 15 .
He might be working for MS , but perhaps he has n't scored highly in his English SATS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, he's only 15.
He might be working for MS, but perhaps he hasn't scored highly in his English SATS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676141</id>
	<title>You know you're a super genius baby</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1247499420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Analyst, 15, Creates Storm After Trashing Twitter</em><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... First he hacks a social networking site, then he creates his own hazardous weather? Look out, Doctor Horrible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Analyst , 15 , Creates Storm After Trashing Twitter ... First he hacks a social networking site , then he creates his own hazardous weather ?
Look out , Doctor Horrible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Analyst, 15, Creates Storm After Trashing Twitter ... First he hacks a social networking site, then he creates his own hazardous weather?
Look out, Doctor Horrible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676017</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>ashtophoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1247498880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you an American Idol judge?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you an American Idol judge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you an American Idol judge?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675793</id>
	<title>my reports</title>
	<author>Dragoon235</author>
	<datestamp>1247497920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>dear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<br> <br>
I feel that it is important to report market information that I have assembled.<br>
Based on a survey of the people I'm living with, Ubuntu has a 25\% market share of the laptop market.<br>
None of my friends own an iPhone, so I assure you that it is a dead market space, MMOs fall into the same category.<br>
On average, there is only one care for six people with driver's licenses.<br>
Wii has 100\% of the market share.<br>
All teenage girls love anime and The Lion King.<br>
In terms of popularity, 4 out of 5 of my roommates wanted a joint memorial for Billy Mays and Michael Jackson.<br>
Everyone I know hates MySpace. I mean everyone. Its a really stupid facebook. The only people who use it are retarded. Surveys report that people are more willing to twitter than use MySpace, which is quite shocking considering previous reports.<br> <br>
All of these reports are held to the highest standards of statistical accuracy and truthfulness. It has the statistical rigour usual to all of my reports.</htmltext>
<tokenext>dear / .
I feel that it is important to report market information that I have assembled .
Based on a survey of the people I 'm living with , Ubuntu has a 25 \ % market share of the laptop market .
None of my friends own an iPhone , so I assure you that it is a dead market space , MMOs fall into the same category .
On average , there is only one care for six people with driver 's licenses .
Wii has 100 \ % of the market share .
All teenage girls love anime and The Lion King .
In terms of popularity , 4 out of 5 of my roommates wanted a joint memorial for Billy Mays and Michael Jackson .
Everyone I know hates MySpace .
I mean everyone .
Its a really stupid facebook .
The only people who use it are retarded .
Surveys report that people are more willing to twitter than use MySpace , which is quite shocking considering previous reports .
All of these reports are held to the highest standards of statistical accuracy and truthfulness .
It has the statistical rigour usual to all of my reports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dear /.
I feel that it is important to report market information that I have assembled.
Based on a survey of the people I'm living with, Ubuntu has a 25\% market share of the laptop market.
None of my friends own an iPhone, so I assure you that it is a dead market space, MMOs fall into the same category.
On average, there is only one care for six people with driver's licenses.
Wii has 100\% of the market share.
All teenage girls love anime and The Lion King.
In terms of popularity, 4 out of 5 of my roommates wanted a joint memorial for Billy Mays and Michael Jackson.
Everyone I know hates MySpace.
I mean everyone.
Its a really stupid facebook.
The only people who use it are retarded.
Surveys report that people are more willing to twitter than use MySpace, which is quite shocking considering previous reports.
All of these reports are held to the highest standards of statistical accuracy and truthfulness.
It has the statistical rigour usual to all of my reports.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680799</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247515320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You were 15 in 8th grade?  Must have been the 3 happiest years of your life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You were 15 in 8th grade ?
Must have been the 3 happiest years of your life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You were 15 in 8th grade?
Must have been the 3 happiest years of your life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676165</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Kurusuki</author>
	<datestamp>1247499480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, homework kind of is a near epidemic in America, but for different reasons than your comment invokes. It's sad when sports and physical ability are the standards for social normalcy in a country. I really wish America could grow up and start treating academics with such respect. Right now it's "better" to be strong and agile than smart or creative. America really needs to both get over the ugly act of making school scores a private non-embarrassing number and make school into a sort of game. Honestly, if there was more shame involved with getting low scores maybe academics would become more apart of regular social activity. It's sad when doing poor in school is considered popular.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , homework kind of is a near epidemic in America , but for different reasons than your comment invokes .
It 's sad when sports and physical ability are the standards for social normalcy in a country .
I really wish America could grow up and start treating academics with such respect .
Right now it 's " better " to be strong and agile than smart or creative .
America really needs to both get over the ugly act of making school scores a private non-embarrassing number and make school into a sort of game .
Honestly , if there was more shame involved with getting low scores maybe academics would become more apart of regular social activity .
It 's sad when doing poor in school is considered popular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, homework kind of is a near epidemic in America, but for different reasons than your comment invokes.
It's sad when sports and physical ability are the standards for social normalcy in a country.
I really wish America could grow up and start treating academics with such respect.
Right now it's "better" to be strong and agile than smart or creative.
America really needs to both get over the ugly act of making school scores a private non-embarrassing number and make school into a sort of game.
Honestly, if there was more shame involved with getting low scores maybe academics would become more apart of regular social activity.
It's sad when doing poor in school is considered popular.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676865</id>
	<title>Don't laugh!</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1247501820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this any different from any other "expert" pulledouttamyass-study and "my opinion is fact" essays? I mean, aside of him being actually IN the group being studied, thus at least being true for at least ONE person in the group?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this any different from any other " expert " pulledouttamyass-study and " my opinion is fact " essays ?
I mean , aside of him being actually IN the group being studied , thus at least being true for at least ONE person in the group ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this any different from any other "expert" pulledouttamyass-study and "my opinion is fact" essays?
I mean, aside of him being actually IN the group being studied, thus at least being true for at least ONE person in the group?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675471</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hilarious as this may be, a single 15-year old's experience cannot possibly speak to the entire experience of people and media today.  FAIL.</p><p>@acehole Never thought of strapping the atari to myself, but I think I'm going to follow suit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hilarious as this may be , a single 15-year old 's experience can not possibly speak to the entire experience of people and media today .
FAIL. @ acehole Never thought of strapping the atari to myself , but I think I 'm going to follow suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hilarious as this may be, a single 15-year old's experience cannot possibly speak to the entire experience of people and media today.
FAIL.@acehole Never thought of strapping the atari to myself, but I think I'm going to follow suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676889</id>
	<title>Twidiots!</title>
	<author>WindowPane</author>
	<datestamp>1247501940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter sucks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter sucks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter sucks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679937</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>dogmatixpsych</author>
	<datestamp>1247511900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's [sic] punctuation errors, capitalization mistakes...and subject-verb agreement problems.</p></div><p> Your sentence is not really ironic but I'll use the word ironic.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br> <br>
Anyway, in some writing styles it is fine to start a sentence and/or paragraph with a numeral. I haven't read his report though so I can't agree or disagree with your statement that the report is an "unreadable mess" - it very well may be a mess.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's [ sic ] punctuation errors , capitalization mistakes...and subject-verb agreement problems .
Your sentence is not really ironic but I 'll use the word ironic .
: ) Anyway , in some writing styles it is fine to start a sentence and/or paragraph with a numeral .
I have n't read his report though so I ca n't agree or disagree with your statement that the report is an " unreadable mess " - it very well may be a mess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's [sic] punctuation errors, capitalization mistakes...and subject-verb agreement problems.
Your sentence is not really ironic but I'll use the word ironic.
:) 
Anyway, in some writing styles it is fine to start a sentence and/or paragraph with a numeral.
I haven't read his report though so I can't agree or disagree with your statement that the report is an "unreadable mess" - it very well may be a mess.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676597</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>haifastudent</author>
	<datestamp>1247501040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This report is an unreadable mess; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the <b>little moron</b> is trying to make.</p></div><p>That's "little Moron-Stanley" to you!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This report is an unreadable mess ; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the little moron is trying to make.That 's " little Moron-Stanley " to you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This report is an unreadable mess; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the little moron is trying to make.That's "little Moron-Stanley" to you!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139</id>
	<title>I've Heard This Story Before</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1247494800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter, claiming that teenagers "realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless".</p></div><p>Sounds <a href="http://www.tonightsbedtimestory.com/the-emperors-new-clothes/" title="tonightsbedtimestory.com" rel="nofollow">familiar</a> [tonightsbedtimestory.com]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>So now the Emperor walked under his high canopy in the midst of the procession, through the streets of his capital; and all the people standing by, and those at the windows, cried out, "Oh! How beautiful are our Emperor's new clothes! What a magnificent train there is to the mantle; and how gracefully the scarf hangs!" in short, no one would allow that he could not see these much-admired clothes; because, in doing so, he would have declared himself either a simpleton or unfit for his office. Certainly, none of the Emperor's various suits, had ever made so great an impression, as these invisible ones.<br> <br>

"But the Emperor has nothing at all on!" said a little child.<br> <br>

"Listen to the voice of innocence!" exclaimed his father; and what the child had said was whispered from one to another.<br> <br>

"But he has nothing at all on!" at last cried out all the people. The Emperor was vexed, for he knew that the people were right; but he thought the procession must go on now! And the lords of the bedchamber took greater pains than ever, to appear holding up a train, although, in reality, there was no train to hold.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter , claiming that teenagers " realize that no one is viewing their profile , so their tweets are pointless " .Sounds familiar [ tonightsbedtimestory.com ] : So now the Emperor walked under his high canopy in the midst of the procession , through the streets of his capital ; and all the people standing by , and those at the windows , cried out , " Oh !
How beautiful are our Emperor 's new clothes !
What a magnificent train there is to the mantle ; and how gracefully the scarf hangs !
" in short , no one would allow that he could not see these much-admired clothes ; because , in doing so , he would have declared himself either a simpleton or unfit for his office .
Certainly , none of the Emperor 's various suits , had ever made so great an impression , as these invisible ones .
" But the Emperor has nothing at all on !
" said a little child .
" Listen to the voice of innocence !
" exclaimed his father ; and what the child had said was whispered from one to another .
" But he has nothing at all on !
" at last cried out all the people .
The Emperor was vexed , for he knew that the people were right ; but he thought the procession must go on now !
And the lords of the bedchamber took greater pains than ever , to appear holding up a train , although , in reality , there was no train to hold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The schoolboy poured scorn on Twitter, claiming that teenagers "realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless".Sounds familiar [tonightsbedtimestory.com]:So now the Emperor walked under his high canopy in the midst of the procession, through the streets of his capital; and all the people standing by, and those at the windows, cried out, "Oh!
How beautiful are our Emperor's new clothes!
What a magnificent train there is to the mantle; and how gracefully the scarf hangs!
" in short, no one would allow that he could not see these much-admired clothes; because, in doing so, he would have declared himself either a simpleton or unfit for his office.
Certainly, none of the Emperor's various suits, had ever made so great an impression, as these invisible ones.
"But the Emperor has nothing at all on!
" said a little child.
"Listen to the voice of innocence!
" exclaimed his father; and what the child had said was whispered from one to another.
"But he has nothing at all on!
" at last cried out all the people.
The Emperor was vexed, for he knew that the people were right; but he thought the procession must go on now!
And the lords of the bedchamber took greater pains than ever, to appear holding up a train, although, in reality, there was no train to hold.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677731</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247504940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the report, which does strike me as somewhat of an opinion piece at best...it's not so much game consoles, but VOIP. You've got the same sort of trend at least arising with some smartphone apps like Fring.</p><p>Simply put, modern game consoles have voice chat readily available, alongside messaging, that does not cost extra. The report suggests that teens (at least, as the author sees them) have little money for phones, so their minutes/SMS/etc are precious. It's also part of the Twitter statement. Part of the reason he says teens don't use it is that it's a pointless use of their limited SMS count.</p><p>It really comes down to the same sort of thing everywhere: teens have little money, and therefore will cut costs where they can, legally or not, and preferably ad free.<br>They'll use free VOIP chat on their game consoles as opposed to cell phone minutes they need to pay for. They'll use free services online for music, or illegally download music, rather than pay for it or listen to ads. They'll get news summarized via the 'net or TV rather than pay for a paper.</p><p>Still, sure, the report reads like most of it was just stuff he pulled out of his ass...but some of it could be indicative of different thought processes of the next generation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the report , which does strike me as somewhat of an opinion piece at best...it 's not so much game consoles , but VOIP .
You 've got the same sort of trend at least arising with some smartphone apps like Fring.Simply put , modern game consoles have voice chat readily available , alongside messaging , that does not cost extra .
The report suggests that teens ( at least , as the author sees them ) have little money for phones , so their minutes/SMS/etc are precious .
It 's also part of the Twitter statement .
Part of the reason he says teens do n't use it is that it 's a pointless use of their limited SMS count.It really comes down to the same sort of thing everywhere : teens have little money , and therefore will cut costs where they can , legally or not , and preferably ad free.They 'll use free VOIP chat on their game consoles as opposed to cell phone minutes they need to pay for .
They 'll use free services online for music , or illegally download music , rather than pay for it or listen to ads .
They 'll get news summarized via the 'net or TV rather than pay for a paper.Still , sure , the report reads like most of it was just stuff he pulled out of his ass...but some of it could be indicative of different thought processes of the next generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the report, which does strike me as somewhat of an opinion piece at best...it's not so much game consoles, but VOIP.
You've got the same sort of trend at least arising with some smartphone apps like Fring.Simply put, modern game consoles have voice chat readily available, alongside messaging, that does not cost extra.
The report suggests that teens (at least, as the author sees them) have little money for phones, so their minutes/SMS/etc are precious.
It's also part of the Twitter statement.
Part of the reason he says teens don't use it is that it's a pointless use of their limited SMS count.It really comes down to the same sort of thing everywhere: teens have little money, and therefore will cut costs where they can, legally or not, and preferably ad free.They'll use free VOIP chat on their game consoles as opposed to cell phone minutes they need to pay for.
They'll use free services online for music, or illegally download music, rather than pay for it or listen to ads.
They'll get news summarized via the 'net or TV rather than pay for a paper.Still, sure, the report reads like most of it was just stuff he pulled out of his ass...but some of it could be indicative of different thought processes of the next generation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</id>
	<title>Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1247497020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe an editor let that report pass. "Near impossible", "&gt;4", "1/3 of teenagers have... 50\% having<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 40\% with", and "Some teenagers make purchases on the internet but this is only used by a small percentage", to name a few. There's punctuation errors, capitalization mistakes, poor abbreviation, and subject-verb agreement problems. One sentence, leading a paragraph, begins with a numeral. This report is an unreadable mess; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the little moron is trying to make.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe an editor let that report pass .
" Near impossible " , " &gt; 4 " , " 1/3 of teenagers have... 50 \ % having ... 40 \ % with " , and " Some teenagers make purchases on the internet but this is only used by a small percentage " , to name a few .
There 's punctuation errors , capitalization mistakes , poor abbreviation , and subject-verb agreement problems .
One sentence , leading a paragraph , begins with a numeral .
This report is an unreadable mess ; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the little moron is trying to make .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe an editor let that report pass.
"Near impossible", "&gt;4", "1/3 of teenagers have... 50\% having ... 40\% with", and "Some teenagers make purchases on the internet but this is only used by a small percentage", to name a few.
There's punctuation errors, capitalization mistakes, poor abbreviation, and subject-verb agreement problems.
One sentence, leading a paragraph, begins with a numeral.
This report is an unreadable mess; the poor phraseology and numerous mistakes draw attention from whatever point the little moron is trying to make.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676183</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1247499600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, if twitter is so useless for business, then why is my business selling more tickets thanks to it? I don't know think that either twitter or facebook will be some sort of long term tool like the telephone, but it doesn't mean that as a business I can ignore it now.</p><p>Twitter is most useful for people with cars, and is not a chat application. If a teen thinks that twitter is competing with chat, he obviously doesn't get it. Maybe once he's in college and is trying to figure out where to go on any particular evening he'll "get" twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , if twitter is so useless for business , then why is my business selling more tickets thanks to it ?
I do n't know think that either twitter or facebook will be some sort of long term tool like the telephone , but it does n't mean that as a business I can ignore it now.Twitter is most useful for people with cars , and is not a chat application .
If a teen thinks that twitter is competing with chat , he obviously does n't get it .
Maybe once he 's in college and is trying to figure out where to go on any particular evening he 'll " get " twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, if twitter is so useless for business, then why is my business selling more tickets thanks to it?
I don't know think that either twitter or facebook will be some sort of long term tool like the telephone, but it doesn't mean that as a business I can ignore it now.Twitter is most useful for people with cars, and is not a chat application.
If a teen thinks that twitter is competing with chat, he obviously doesn't get it.
Maybe once he's in college and is trying to figure out where to go on any particular evening he'll "get" twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683203</id>
	<title>Youngsters are not hidebound</title>
	<author>SleepyJohn</author>
	<datestamp>1247482020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My 10 yr old daughter communicates with her friends using her DS or a llama sim website or a virtual penguin community, depending on which is most convenient at the time - all are free of charge.  If necessary she uses the phone - which is not.  Youngsters are not as hidebound as oldsters, and will simply use the most suitable tool for the job - ie the cheapest system their friends are likely to be on the other end of.  Twitter seems best suited to celebrities of the sort who hold court at parties in order to hear their own voices. Not of much interest to the average Teen who just wants to chat to his mates, I suspect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My 10 yr old daughter communicates with her friends using her DS or a llama sim website or a virtual penguin community , depending on which is most convenient at the time - all are free of charge .
If necessary she uses the phone - which is not .
Youngsters are not as hidebound as oldsters , and will simply use the most suitable tool for the job - ie the cheapest system their friends are likely to be on the other end of .
Twitter seems best suited to celebrities of the sort who hold court at parties in order to hear their own voices .
Not of much interest to the average Teen who just wants to chat to his mates , I suspect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My 10 yr old daughter communicates with her friends using her DS or a llama sim website or a virtual penguin community, depending on which is most convenient at the time - all are free of charge.
If necessary she uses the phone - which is not.
Youngsters are not as hidebound as oldsters, and will simply use the most suitable tool for the job - ie the cheapest system their friends are likely to be on the other end of.
Twitter seems best suited to celebrities of the sort who hold court at parties in order to hear their own voices.
Not of much interest to the average Teen who just wants to chat to his mates, I suspect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676377</id>
	<title>Published Where?</title>
	<author>bistromath007</author>
	<datestamp>1247500440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it at all possible to read this report as opposed to a report about the report?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it at all possible to read this report as opposed to a report about the report ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it at all possible to read this report as opposed to a report about the report?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677395</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>SpooForBrains</author>
	<datestamp>1247503740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stephen Fry, one of the most followed "twits" is hardly a vacuous celebrity. I would argue that neither is Wil Wheaton, another highly popular Twit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stephen Fry , one of the most followed " twits " is hardly a vacuous celebrity .
I would argue that neither is Wil Wheaton , another highly popular Twit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stephen Fry, one of the most followed "twits" is hardly a vacuous celebrity.
I would argue that neither is Wil Wheaton, another highly popular Twit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28695977</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247564640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not Democrats or Republicans that are 'just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy our civil liberties' --  It's the Plutocrats. More for me, less for you. By the time you figure it out, we're offshore and limitations statutes have expired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Democrats or Republicans that are 'just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy our civil liberties ' -- It 's the Plutocrats .
More for me , less for you .
By the time you figure it out , we 're offshore and limitations statutes have expired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Democrats or Republicans that are 'just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy our civil liberties' --  It's the Plutocrats.
More for me, less for you.
By the time you figure it out, we're offshore and limitations statutes have expired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678659</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247507880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know.  It's almost like reading a whole series of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know .
It 's almost like reading a whole series of / .
posts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know.
It's almost like reading a whole series of /.
posts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677673</id>
	<title>consoles yeah right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247504760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from the portability aspect. ~1.3 billion mobile phone sales anually across the globe - compared to ~100m over a few years for 2.5 / 3G consoles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from the portability aspect .
~ 1.3 billion mobile phone sales anually across the globe - compared to ~ 100m over a few years for 2.5 / 3G consoles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from the portability aspect.
~1.3 billion mobile phone sales anually across the globe - compared to ~100m over a few years for 2.5 / 3G consoles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675191</id>
	<title>In Other News...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>User interviews still considered useful</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>User interviews still considered useful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>User interviews still considered useful</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</id>
	<title>Games consoles?</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1247495460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends."</p></div></blockquote><p>Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends .
" Maybe for 10 year olds , but certainly not for the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He also claimed games consoles are replacing mobile phones as the way to chat with friends.
"Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1247497800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</p></div><p>The next regular report will, no doubt, assert with full statistical rigour that "Twitter is for twits". It's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception.<br>
People don't "tweet", they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters. Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols (a motley collection of vacuous celebrities, sports stars, self-serving shills, and the like). Still, pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors. Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : Morgan Stanley points out that Robson 's assessment of the media landscape does n't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.The next regular report will , no doubt , assert with full statistical rigour that " Twitter is for twits " .
It 's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception .
People do n't " tweet " , they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters .
Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols ( a motley collection of vacuous celebrities , sports stars , self-serving shills , and the like ) .
Still , pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors .
Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.The next regular report will, no doubt, assert with full statistical rigour that "Twitter is for twits".
It's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception.
People don't "tweet", they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters.
Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols (a motley collection of vacuous celebrities, sports stars, self-serving shills, and the like).
Still, pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors.
Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682989</id>
	<title>Re:The only real use for Twitter...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247481060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't use twitter but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... why the need to restrict it to "important events"?</p><p>Do we say that Slashdot should only be used for reporting "important events" (which, a 15 year old writing something about Twitter does not qualify)? Do we say that the forum here should only be used for "important posts"?</p><p>As for limited bandwidth, I entirely agree. Which means the "only" use for Twitter is anyone with a mobile phone.</p><p><i>it's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it.</i></p><p>Nonsense, lots of people have been slagging off Twitter - you only have to look here on Slashdot to see that. This is only gaining publicity because Morgan Stanley are pulling a tabloid-style tactic - they're big enough to give it publicity, but by using a 15 year old, they can get away with slagging Twitter off in a manner that is less professional than what people would usually expect of them. And they get even more publicity, because people go "OMG, 15 year old wrote this? How amazing!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't use twitter but ... why the need to restrict it to " important events " ? Do we say that Slashdot should only be used for reporting " important events " ( which , a 15 year old writing something about Twitter does not qualify ) ?
Do we say that the forum here should only be used for " important posts " ? As for limited bandwidth , I entirely agree .
Which means the " only " use for Twitter is anyone with a mobile phone.it 's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it.Nonsense , lots of people have been slagging off Twitter - you only have to look here on Slashdot to see that .
This is only gaining publicity because Morgan Stanley are pulling a tabloid-style tactic - they 're big enough to give it publicity , but by using a 15 year old , they can get away with slagging Twitter off in a manner that is less professional than what people would usually expect of them .
And they get even more publicity , because people go " OMG , 15 year old wrote this ?
How amazing ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't use twitter but ... why the need to restrict it to "important events"?Do we say that Slashdot should only be used for reporting "important events" (which, a 15 year old writing something about Twitter does not qualify)?
Do we say that the forum here should only be used for "important posts"?As for limited bandwidth, I entirely agree.
Which means the "only" use for Twitter is anyone with a mobile phone.it's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it.Nonsense, lots of people have been slagging off Twitter - you only have to look here on Slashdot to see that.
This is only gaining publicity because Morgan Stanley are pulling a tabloid-style tactic - they're big enough to give it publicity, but by using a 15 year old, they can get away with slagging Twitter off in a manner that is less professional than what people would usually expect of them.
And they get even more publicity, because people go "OMG, 15 year old wrote this?
How amazing!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676453</id>
	<title>aged 15 in 8th grade?</title>
	<author>Kris Thalamus</author>
	<datestamp>1247500620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was sexually active at age 15, and masturbated much more than I do now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was sexually active at age 15 , and masturbated much more than I do now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was sexually active at age 15, and masturbated much more than I do now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676147</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1247499420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, you're not wrong.  You SHOULD be, but society is learning that you're actually not.  I've read it elsewhere, too - the people that you have 'lost touch with' aren't suddenly better/more interesting/more worthwhile people because of the internet.  MySpace, Facebook, Twitter and whatever's coming next all sell a service based on a non-product.  We're not supposed to know that it is a non-product, because it is supposed to be a valuable service.  The premise, however is flawed.  "No one cares about my tweets," is insurmountable and cannot be solved via technology.  Not even Web 3.0 will change the basics of humanity.</p><p>Once a majority of people find that their Facebook accounts are more of a negative than a positive, Facebook will have a hard time staying in business.</p><p>Thus the controversy.  Not so much what this kid said, but the gap between what was promised and what actually gets delivered.  The kid is just a vessel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , you 're not wrong .
You SHOULD be , but society is learning that you 're actually not .
I 've read it elsewhere , too - the people that you have 'lost touch with ' are n't suddenly better/more interesting/more worthwhile people because of the internet .
MySpace , Facebook , Twitter and whatever 's coming next all sell a service based on a non-product .
We 're not supposed to know that it is a non-product , because it is supposed to be a valuable service .
The premise , however is flawed .
" No one cares about my tweets , " is insurmountable and can not be solved via technology .
Not even Web 3.0 will change the basics of humanity.Once a majority of people find that their Facebook accounts are more of a negative than a positive , Facebook will have a hard time staying in business.Thus the controversy .
Not so much what this kid said , but the gap between what was promised and what actually gets delivered .
The kid is just a vessel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, you're not wrong.
You SHOULD be, but society is learning that you're actually not.
I've read it elsewhere, too - the people that you have 'lost touch with' aren't suddenly better/more interesting/more worthwhile people because of the internet.
MySpace, Facebook, Twitter and whatever's coming next all sell a service based on a non-product.
We're not supposed to know that it is a non-product, because it is supposed to be a valuable service.
The premise, however is flawed.
"No one cares about my tweets," is insurmountable and cannot be solved via technology.
Not even Web 3.0 will change the basics of humanity.Once a majority of people find that their Facebook accounts are more of a negative than a positive, Facebook will have a hard time staying in business.Thus the controversy.
Not so much what this kid said, but the gap between what was promised and what actually gets delivered.
The kid is just a vessel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676009</id>
	<title>Just because his parent's won't buy him an iPhone</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1247498880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone else get that a teenager is obviously going to use a PS3 or 360 because that's what his parents bought him?</p><p>I hate twitter as much as the next guy, but other things "passe" to a fifteen year old might include:</p><p>showing up on time<br>white tennis shoes<br>working outside<br>The Beatles<br>playing actual instruments instead of the ones with Rock Band</p><p>So, if I wanted to market a product - like a smartphone - to teenagers, I'd probably read his report with a little interest. And then I'd remember that he's not old enough to sign a contract to get one in the first place, and couldn't afford $100 a month anyway. So I'm glad he wrote a report, but let me ask the most significant question that has escaped the great minds at Morgan Stanley We-Fucked-The-Goat-When-It-Came-To-Recognizing-The-Real-Estate-Bubble: <b> <i>who gives a shit?</i> </b></p><p>I didn't understand when I was his age, but I do now. And that is, get a job and an apartment - without mommy and daddy's help - and then we'll talk. By the way, my youngest sister, who's still a teenager, types on her non-smart phone all the time, and so do all her friends, even when they are playing video games. Why? Because it works, they don't have to be at a computer or a game console, and since their parents have somewhat of a clue, it's free with an extra $10 a month on their cell bill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else get that a teenager is obviously going to use a PS3 or 360 because that 's what his parents bought him ? I hate twitter as much as the next guy , but other things " passe " to a fifteen year old might include : showing up on timewhite tennis shoesworking outsideThe Beatlesplaying actual instruments instead of the ones with Rock BandSo , if I wanted to market a product - like a smartphone - to teenagers , I 'd probably read his report with a little interest .
And then I 'd remember that he 's not old enough to sign a contract to get one in the first place , and could n't afford $ 100 a month anyway .
So I 'm glad he wrote a report , but let me ask the most significant question that has escaped the great minds at Morgan Stanley We-Fucked-The-Goat-When-It-Came-To-Recognizing-The-Real-Estate-Bubble : who gives a shit ?
I did n't understand when I was his age , but I do now .
And that is , get a job and an apartment - without mommy and daddy 's help - and then we 'll talk .
By the way , my youngest sister , who 's still a teenager , types on her non-smart phone all the time , and so do all her friends , even when they are playing video games .
Why ? Because it works , they do n't have to be at a computer or a game console , and since their parents have somewhat of a clue , it 's free with an extra $ 10 a month on their cell bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else get that a teenager is obviously going to use a PS3 or 360 because that's what his parents bought him?I hate twitter as much as the next guy, but other things "passe" to a fifteen year old might include:showing up on timewhite tennis shoesworking outsideThe Beatlesplaying actual instruments instead of the ones with Rock BandSo, if I wanted to market a product - like a smartphone - to teenagers, I'd probably read his report with a little interest.
And then I'd remember that he's not old enough to sign a contract to get one in the first place, and couldn't afford $100 a month anyway.
So I'm glad he wrote a report, but let me ask the most significant question that has escaped the great minds at Morgan Stanley We-Fucked-The-Goat-When-It-Came-To-Recognizing-The-Real-Estate-Bubble:  who gives a shit?
I didn't understand when I was his age, but I do now.
And that is, get a job and an apartment - without mommy and daddy's help - and then we'll talk.
By the way, my youngest sister, who's still a teenager, types on her non-smart phone all the time, and so do all her friends, even when they are playing video games.
Why? Because it works, they don't have to be at a computer or a game console, and since their parents have somewhat of a clue, it's free with an extra $10 a month on their cell bill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675591</id>
	<title>Re:Bleeding edge</title>
	<author>baka\_toroi</author>
	<datestamp>1247497140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this a troll?

BTW, I also LOL'd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this a troll ?
BTW , I also LOL 'd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this a troll?
BTW, I also LOL'd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683077</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Sj0</author>
	<datestamp>1247481420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are you, 12?</p><p>"LOL she wuz texting and fell down I wish she died cuz ppl who text are stupid and should die"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you , 12 ?
" LOL she wuz texting and fell down I wish she died cuz ppl who text are stupid and should die "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you, 12?
"LOL she wuz texting and fell down I wish she died cuz ppl who text are stupid and should die"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679497</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247510640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Journalism, certainly, but isn't this from a major investment advice firm?  Adults are taking this seriously?  Wow, we're fucked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Journalism , certainly , but is n't this from a major investment advice firm ?
Adults are taking this seriously ?
Wow , we 're fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Journalism, certainly, but isn't this from a major investment advice firm?
Adults are taking this seriously?
Wow, we're fucked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676233</id>
	<title>Teen Money Motive</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1247499900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is clear from reading the report is that ANYWHERE that money is required, especially in terms of a CONSTANT FLOW of money (subscription or annual fees, etc), Teens don't partake. Teens don't have a steady income, and therefore don't pay any form of utility. The point about having features on their phones like email was interesting, but again it's a matter of money and the fact that teens don't communicate with the people that are most important to them via email. They have no corporate structure mandating teenage protocols, like you do in the workforce.

The exception is console gaming, but I believe this is because console games are often gifts from parents, or an item that requires a single payment up front, but then not much further investment. Also console games can be easily shared between other teens. One gets the game, plays it, and then hands it off to a friend. Again keeping expenses to a minimum.  Consoles with internet access are probably gaining popularity because parents are generally still unaware of them, and even if they know of it, it keeps the teen in a known location. Additionally, they don't pay for the internet, since it is on the family network.

I enjoyed the honesty of the report. Though I do think he avoided discussion of a use of the internet that teens probably don't talk about but what cause most parents a lot of wariness: namely, pornography.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is clear from reading the report is that ANYWHERE that money is required , especially in terms of a CONSTANT FLOW of money ( subscription or annual fees , etc ) , Teens do n't partake .
Teens do n't have a steady income , and therefore do n't pay any form of utility .
The point about having features on their phones like email was interesting , but again it 's a matter of money and the fact that teens do n't communicate with the people that are most important to them via email .
They have no corporate structure mandating teenage protocols , like you do in the workforce .
The exception is console gaming , but I believe this is because console games are often gifts from parents , or an item that requires a single payment up front , but then not much further investment .
Also console games can be easily shared between other teens .
One gets the game , plays it , and then hands it off to a friend .
Again keeping expenses to a minimum .
Consoles with internet access are probably gaining popularity because parents are generally still unaware of them , and even if they know of it , it keeps the teen in a known location .
Additionally , they do n't pay for the internet , since it is on the family network .
I enjoyed the honesty of the report .
Though I do think he avoided discussion of a use of the internet that teens probably do n't talk about but what cause most parents a lot of wariness : namely , pornography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is clear from reading the report is that ANYWHERE that money is required, especially in terms of a CONSTANT FLOW of money (subscription or annual fees, etc), Teens don't partake.
Teens don't have a steady income, and therefore don't pay any form of utility.
The point about having features on their phones like email was interesting, but again it's a matter of money and the fact that teens don't communicate with the people that are most important to them via email.
They have no corporate structure mandating teenage protocols, like you do in the workforce.
The exception is console gaming, but I believe this is because console games are often gifts from parents, or an item that requires a single payment up front, but then not much further investment.
Also console games can be easily shared between other teens.
One gets the game, plays it, and then hands it off to a friend.
Again keeping expenses to a minimum.
Consoles with internet access are probably gaining popularity because parents are generally still unaware of them, and even if they know of it, it keeps the teen in a known location.
Additionally, they don't pay for the internet, since it is on the family network.
I enjoyed the honesty of the report.
Though I do think he avoided discussion of a use of the internet that teens probably don't talk about but what cause most parents a lot of wariness: namely, pornography.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble. Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling "analytical" report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he's a genius with social insight in to media tools?</p></div><p>The issue you notice is simple.  If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report, he or she would be viewed as "old" or "not with it" and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing.  Oh, but wait, we have a 15 year old telling us this?  Shit, that's the demographic this is supposed to work on!  Oh man, now we better listen.  And suddenly, overnight, it's okay to doubt Twitter's power out loud.  Amazing.  <br> <br>

The news here is that it took the voice of an innocent to wake up business men looking for the next marketing scam to pull on young people.  "MySpace didn't work for marketing, maybe this Twitter thing will work?  Never mind that I think it's stupid, I don't want to out myself as technologically inept and reveal I don't even use e-mail.  No, we must avoid our inadequacies instead of addressing them."  That's basically what's at work, very much like The Emperor's New Clothes (see my post above).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble .
Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling " analytical " report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he 's a genius with social insight in to media tools ? The issue you notice is simple .
If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report , he or she would be viewed as " old " or " not with it " and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing .
Oh , but wait , we have a 15 year old telling us this ?
Shit , that 's the demographic this is supposed to work on !
Oh man , now we better listen .
And suddenly , overnight , it 's okay to doubt Twitter 's power out loud .
Amazing . The news here is that it took the voice of an innocent to wake up business men looking for the next marketing scam to pull on young people .
" MySpace did n't work for marketing , maybe this Twitter thing will work ?
Never mind that I think it 's stupid , I do n't want to out myself as technologically inept and reveal I do n't even use e-mail .
No , we must avoid our inadequacies instead of addressing them .
" That 's basically what 's at work , very much like The Emperor 's New Clothes ( see my post above ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble.
Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling "analytical" report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he's a genius with social insight in to media tools?The issue you notice is simple.
If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report, he or she would be viewed as "old" or "not with it" and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing.
Oh, but wait, we have a 15 year old telling us this?
Shit, that's the demographic this is supposed to work on!
Oh man, now we better listen.
And suddenly, overnight, it's okay to doubt Twitter's power out loud.
Amazing.   

The news here is that it took the voice of an innocent to wake up business men looking for the next marketing scam to pull on young people.
"MySpace didn't work for marketing, maybe this Twitter thing will work?
Never mind that I think it's stupid, I don't want to out myself as technologically inept and reveal I don't even use e-mail.
No, we must avoid our inadequacies instead of addressing them.
"  That's basically what's at work, very much like The Emperor's New Clothes (see my post above).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675331</id>
	<title>here is the report</title>
	<author>pikine</author>
	<datestamp>1247495820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf" title="ft.com">Here is the report</a> [ft.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the report [ ft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the report [ft.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28690291</id>
	<title>I think the article is correct</title>
	<author>RogerWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1247582940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know abot 15 year olds, but in the group of 20-30 year olds around me, it's MSN, Skype, Ventrillo, TeamSpeak and forums that are used for communication. Everyone has a headset nowadays and talks to friends while doing something else on the computer. They don't want to type and then read what others wrote. I think I spend 10+ hours a week behind a computer talking to friends while doing other things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know abot 15 year olds , but in the group of 20-30 year olds around me , it 's MSN , Skype , Ventrillo , TeamSpeak and forums that are used for communication .
Everyone has a headset nowadays and talks to friends while doing something else on the computer .
They do n't want to type and then read what others wrote .
I think I spend 10 + hours a week behind a computer talking to friends while doing other things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know abot 15 year olds, but in the group of 20-30 year olds around me, it's MSN, Skype, Ventrillo, TeamSpeak and forums that are used for communication.
Everyone has a headset nowadays and talks to friends while doing something else on the computer.
They don't want to type and then read what others wrote.
I think I spend 10+ hours a week behind a computer talking to friends while doing other things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676391</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1247500500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Analysis about trends and behaviors of young consumers is done predominantly by people which are not teenagers anymore and haven't been such for at least 10 years. Those people have a "grown-up" view on teenagers, based on their past experience as teenagers, having grown at a time when neither Computer Games, the Internet or Mobile phones were widespread and available to your typical teenager, much less your average kid.</p><p>Nowadays, children get introduced to many or all of those things sometimes before they can walk. It's thus hardly surprising that a report on what teenagers like, which was done by a teenager, has a whole different take on things than your typical report done by a 30-year-old analyst.</p><p>What's news here is that somebody actually listened to the teenager's opinions and found them worthy of publication.</p><p>Of course, given that financial analysis is pretty much opinionated bullshit (I should know, I work in Investment Banking), you should take it with a pinch of salt, even when coming from a 15-year-old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Analysis about trends and behaviors of young consumers is done predominantly by people which are not teenagers anymore and have n't been such for at least 10 years .
Those people have a " grown-up " view on teenagers , based on their past experience as teenagers , having grown at a time when neither Computer Games , the Internet or Mobile phones were widespread and available to your typical teenager , much less your average kid.Nowadays , children get introduced to many or all of those things sometimes before they can walk .
It 's thus hardly surprising that a report on what teenagers like , which was done by a teenager , has a whole different take on things than your typical report done by a 30-year-old analyst.What 's news here is that somebody actually listened to the teenager 's opinions and found them worthy of publication.Of course , given that financial analysis is pretty much opinionated bullshit ( I should know , I work in Investment Banking ) , you should take it with a pinch of salt , even when coming from a 15-year-old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Analysis about trends and behaviors of young consumers is done predominantly by people which are not teenagers anymore and haven't been such for at least 10 years.
Those people have a "grown-up" view on teenagers, based on their past experience as teenagers, having grown at a time when neither Computer Games, the Internet or Mobile phones were widespread and available to your typical teenager, much less your average kid.Nowadays, children get introduced to many or all of those things sometimes before they can walk.
It's thus hardly surprising that a report on what teenagers like, which was done by a teenager, has a whole different take on things than your typical report done by a 30-year-old analyst.What's news here is that somebody actually listened to the teenager's opinions and found them worthy of publication.Of course, given that financial analysis is pretty much opinionated bullshit (I should know, I work in Investment Banking), you should take it with a pinch of salt, even when coming from a 15-year-old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683187</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247481900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the implementation of LiveJournal - settings to easily make material non-public, and it avoids all of the Facebook confusion about who is broadcasting what information about you and who can see it.</p><p><i> I look at her page, and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis, and we're not talking high school or college kids here. And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - "can't wait to go drinking", "feeling lonely", "two days until the weekend", "my life is like xxx song lyric", etc. </i></p><p>I think this is a particular problem with Facebook, as it encourages people to type in whatever random thing they're doing or feeling write now. So it means that the feed is mostly boring, and anything important gets lost in the noise. LiveJournal is meant as a blog/journal, so people are more likely to write something worthwhile, every single time they post (and if you have a friend who still writes crap all the time, well, don't read them).</p><p>(It's not all bad though, I think Facebook does do organising "Events" better - as the information gets tagged separate, as well as being emailed to you.)</p><p>And I love SMS because I hate talking on phones. Also it has the advantage that you don't both need to be there and ready to take a call. You could probably say the same thing about email, "it's quicker to phone them", but email has its advantages, and some people simply prefer it to phones.</p><p><i>I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.</i></p><p>I bet conversation snippets between you and a friend chatting to a pub are completely phony or useless if heard by a complete stranger. Same with most phone calls, come to that. And how do you think a random selection of Slashdot comments would look to an outsider?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the implementation of LiveJournal - settings to easily make material non-public , and it avoids all of the Facebook confusion about who is broadcasting what information about you and who can see it .
I look at her page , and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis , and we 're not talking high school or college kids here .
And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - " ca n't wait to go drinking " , " feeling lonely " , " two days until the weekend " , " my life is like xxx song lyric " , etc .
I think this is a particular problem with Facebook , as it encourages people to type in whatever random thing they 're doing or feeling write now .
So it means that the feed is mostly boring , and anything important gets lost in the noise .
LiveJournal is meant as a blog/journal , so people are more likely to write something worthwhile , every single time they post ( and if you have a friend who still writes crap all the time , well , do n't read them ) .
( It 's not all bad though , I think Facebook does do organising " Events " better - as the information gets tagged separate , as well as being emailed to you .
) And I love SMS because I hate talking on phones .
Also it has the advantage that you do n't both need to be there and ready to take a call .
You could probably say the same thing about email , " it 's quicker to phone them " , but email has its advantages , and some people simply prefer it to phones.I just do n't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.I bet conversation snippets between you and a friend chatting to a pub are completely phony or useless if heard by a complete stranger .
Same with most phone calls , come to that .
And how do you think a random selection of Slashdot comments would look to an outsider ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the implementation of LiveJournal - settings to easily make material non-public, and it avoids all of the Facebook confusion about who is broadcasting what information about you and who can see it.
I look at her page, and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis, and we're not talking high school or college kids here.
And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - "can't wait to go drinking", "feeling lonely", "two days until the weekend", "my life is like xxx song lyric", etc.
I think this is a particular problem with Facebook, as it encourages people to type in whatever random thing they're doing or feeling write now.
So it means that the feed is mostly boring, and anything important gets lost in the noise.
LiveJournal is meant as a blog/journal, so people are more likely to write something worthwhile, every single time they post (and if you have a friend who still writes crap all the time, well, don't read them).
(It's not all bad though, I think Facebook does do organising "Events" better - as the information gets tagged separate, as well as being emailed to you.
)And I love SMS because I hate talking on phones.
Also it has the advantage that you don't both need to be there and ready to take a call.
You could probably say the same thing about email, "it's quicker to phone them", but email has its advantages, and some people simply prefer it to phones.I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.I bet conversation snippets between you and a friend chatting to a pub are completely phony or useless if heard by a complete stranger.
Same with most phone calls, come to that.
And how do you think a random selection of Slashdot comments would look to an outsider?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676267</id>
	<title>well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No-one looks at my twitter profile so I post here to slashdot. Take that 15 year old!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No-one looks at my twitter profile so I post here to slashdot .
Take that 15 year old !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No-one looks at my twitter profile so I post here to slashdot.
Take that 15 year old!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28770109</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1248192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But if I were on, I'd have sent out something like one per month or less (and they'd be big things, like one narcisist one about my vacation to California, one about my wife being pregnant, and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency, with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country, once known).</p></div></blockquote><p>So it would be like a Facebook status update?</p><blockquote><div><p>But with multiple per day, I don't care when someone's going to the mall so I can run into them there.</p></div></blockquote><p>I thought the only point of twitter over Facebook was the multiple tiny updates per day?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if I were on , I 'd have sent out something like one per month or less ( and they 'd be big things , like one narcisist one about my vacation to California , one about my wife being pregnant , and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency , with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country , once known ) .So it would be like a Facebook status update ? But with multiple per day , I do n't care when someone 's going to the mall so I can run into them there.I thought the only point of twitter over Facebook was the multiple tiny updates per day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if I were on, I'd have sent out something like one per month or less (and they'd be big things, like one narcisist one about my vacation to California, one about my wife being pregnant, and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency, with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country, once known).So it would be like a Facebook status update?But with multiple per day, I don't care when someone's going to the mall so I can run into them there.I thought the only point of twitter over Facebook was the multiple tiny updates per day?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683251</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247482260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a report is being trumpted as being written by some child prodigy analyst, then yes, I do expect more from it.</p><p>I'm perfectly capable of trying to understand what someone is saying if they have difficulty getting their views across. But the point is that if they have difficulty getting their views across, I'm not sure why special attention is being paid to it. Why is this any better than millions of other essays written by 15 year olds? How about we filter them by quality, rather than who was lucky to get work experience at a big company?</p><p>Put it this way - if someone was applying to a job at Morgan Stanley, and the covering letter had mistakes, do you think they'd say "Well, I'm sure we can understand what he meant to say"? Or do you think they'll use it as an easy way to filter him out from the large number of other applicants?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a report is being trumpted as being written by some child prodigy analyst , then yes , I do expect more from it.I 'm perfectly capable of trying to understand what someone is saying if they have difficulty getting their views across .
But the point is that if they have difficulty getting their views across , I 'm not sure why special attention is being paid to it .
Why is this any better than millions of other essays written by 15 year olds ?
How about we filter them by quality , rather than who was lucky to get work experience at a big company ? Put it this way - if someone was applying to a job at Morgan Stanley , and the covering letter had mistakes , do you think they 'd say " Well , I 'm sure we can understand what he meant to say " ?
Or do you think they 'll use it as an easy way to filter him out from the large number of other applicants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a report is being trumpted as being written by some child prodigy analyst, then yes, I do expect more from it.I'm perfectly capable of trying to understand what someone is saying if they have difficulty getting their views across.
But the point is that if they have difficulty getting their views across, I'm not sure why special attention is being paid to it.
Why is this any better than millions of other essays written by 15 year olds?
How about we filter them by quality, rather than who was lucky to get work experience at a big company?Put it this way - if someone was applying to a job at Morgan Stanley, and the covering letter had mistakes, do you think they'd say "Well, I'm sure we can understand what he meant to say"?
Or do you think they'll use it as an easy way to filter him out from the large number of other applicants?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675655</id>
	<title>Is this really revolutionary?</title>
	<author>travdaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1247497380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Business people reading a 15-year-old's commentary on what teenagers think about products aimed at teenagers?  Is this really a new concept?  <br> <br>Wait, if this catches on, maybe next they'll ask programmers what they think about technology projects in the workplace?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Business people reading a 15-year-old 's commentary on what teenagers think about products aimed at teenagers ?
Is this really a new concept ?
Wait , if this catches on , maybe next they 'll ask programmers what they think about technology projects in the workplace ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Business people reading a 15-year-old's commentary on what teenagers think about products aimed at teenagers?
Is this really a new concept?
Wait, if this catches on, maybe next they'll ask programmers what they think about technology projects in the workplace?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676219</id>
	<title>He's just poor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you actually read the report, you'll see that he and his friends are mainly concerned with cost. Twitter is not used because sending a text message to twitter costs money, and, since nobody reads their profiles anyway, it's better to send the message to friends directly. The rest of the report is on the same theme: teenagers don't want to spend any money. This is certainly not a new trend; when I was in high school, my allowance was certainly inadequate to subscribe to expensive services, buy computer games, or expensive gadgets. I don't see why anyone is surprized that this is all still true today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you actually read the report , you 'll see that he and his friends are mainly concerned with cost .
Twitter is not used because sending a text message to twitter costs money , and , since nobody reads their profiles anyway , it 's better to send the message to friends directly .
The rest of the report is on the same theme : teenagers do n't want to spend any money .
This is certainly not a new trend ; when I was in high school , my allowance was certainly inadequate to subscribe to expensive services , buy computer games , or expensive gadgets .
I do n't see why anyone is surprized that this is all still true today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you actually read the report, you'll see that he and his friends are mainly concerned with cost.
Twitter is not used because sending a text message to twitter costs money, and, since nobody reads their profiles anyway, it's better to send the message to friends directly.
The rest of the report is on the same theme: teenagers don't want to spend any money.
This is certainly not a new trend; when I was in high school, my allowance was certainly inadequate to subscribe to expensive services, buy computer games, or expensive gadgets.
I don't see why anyone is surprized that this is all still true today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676199</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>pinkj</author>
	<datestamp>1247499780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i don't Twitter or have a Facebook page.  I do have a Myspace page for my music, but i visit it maybe once or twice every 2 weeks to automatically allow all friends, reply to the odd mail message and delete spam.  so i don't have much of an addiction to social networking.

MY big addiction is reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. comments!  i should be working right now!!  i'm sure others are in the same boat, ammarite??

stop being so interesting/informative/insightful/funny!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i do n't Twitter or have a Facebook page .
I do have a Myspace page for my music , but i visit it maybe once or twice every 2 weeks to automatically allow all friends , reply to the odd mail message and delete spam .
so i do n't have much of an addiction to social networking .
MY big addiction is reading / .
comments ! i should be working right now ! !
i 'm sure others are in the same boat , ammarite ? ?
stop being so interesting/informative/insightful/funny !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i don't Twitter or have a Facebook page.
I do have a Myspace page for my music, but i visit it maybe once or twice every 2 weeks to automatically allow all friends, reply to the odd mail message and delete spam.
so i don't have much of an addiction to social networking.
MY big addiction is reading /.
comments!  i should be working right now!!
i'm sure others are in the same boat, ammarite??
stop being so interesting/informative/insightful/funny!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678611</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh, I can do this!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1247507760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was a teenager like 1 year ago, and I'll tell you - I have in my lifetime, and I still do on occaison, PURCHASE A CD.</p><p>For him to say that all the Teenagers he's known have never purchased a CD before completely shock me.</p><p>If that were the case, who the hell is buying the Hannah Montana and High School Musical Audio Track CD's from HMV? They've been sold out for months!</p><p>I mean...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a teenager like 1 year ago , and I 'll tell you - I have in my lifetime , and I still do on occaison , PURCHASE A CD.For him to say that all the Teenagers he 's known have never purchased a CD before completely shock me.If that were the case , who the hell is buying the Hannah Montana and High School Musical Audio Track CD 's from HMV ?
They 've been sold out for months ! I mean.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a teenager like 1 year ago, and I'll tell you - I have in my lifetime, and I still do on occaison, PURCHASE A CD.For him to say that all the Teenagers he's known have never purchased a CD before completely shock me.If that were the case, who the hell is buying the Hannah Montana and High School Musical Audio Track CD's from HMV?
They've been sold out for months!I mean...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676129</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.</p><p>Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America") early bedtimes ("a gross violation of the constitution") and girls ("icky!") while we're at it?</p><p>Fucking embarrassing.</p></div><p>Isaac Newton published many of the founding principles of physics aged 17 and he&#194;d already written a great deal before that, even before he was 15 in fact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 15-year-old " analyst " writes one of the most " clearest and most thought-provoking insights " for your publication , that says a lot more about your publication ( and the state of American journalism ) than the 15-year-old in question.Why do n't we ask him to write about homework ( " a near-epidemic in America " ) early bedtimes ( " a gross violation of the constitution " ) and girls ( " icky !
" ) while we 're at it ? Fucking embarrassing.Isaac Newton published many of the founding principles of physics aged 17 and he   d already written a great deal before that , even before he was 15 in fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America") early bedtimes ("a gross violation of the constitution") and girls ("icky!
") while we're at it?Fucking embarrassing.Isaac Newton published many of the founding principles of physics aged 17 and heÂd already written a great deal before that, even before he was 15 in fact.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675917</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>uncle-gendo</author>
	<datestamp>1247498520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This gets modded +5 -- and yet we wonder why young people have "no respect for their elders"...

This is just the sort of condescension that encourages teenagers to act like idiots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This gets modded + 5 -- and yet we wonder why young people have " no respect for their elders " .. . This is just the sort of condescension that encourages teenagers to act like idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This gets modded +5 -- and yet we wonder why young people have "no respect for their elders"...

This is just the sort of condescension that encourages teenagers to act like idiots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675679</id>
	<title>The innocent speaking truth</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1247497500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This only has relevance because it agrees with existing opinions that have no way to be expressed.  Think of "The Emperor's New Clothes", in which everyone has a thought, but anyone who expresses that thought will be ostracized (executed in the orignial story, but ostracism is the nonlethal modern alternative).  Just think of a New York Times journalist who came out and said twitter was crap and people who use twitter are self-absorbed idiots who shouldn't be trusted with the fourth estate's reponsibility to safeguard democracy.  His opinions would be attacked and discarded faster the Joe the Plumber.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This only has relevance because it agrees with existing opinions that have no way to be expressed .
Think of " The Emperor 's New Clothes " , in which everyone has a thought , but anyone who expresses that thought will be ostracized ( executed in the orignial story , but ostracism is the nonlethal modern alternative ) .
Just think of a New York Times journalist who came out and said twitter was crap and people who use twitter are self-absorbed idiots who should n't be trusted with the fourth estate 's reponsibility to safeguard democracy .
His opinions would be attacked and discarded faster the Joe the Plumber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This only has relevance because it agrees with existing opinions that have no way to be expressed.
Think of "The Emperor's New Clothes", in which everyone has a thought, but anyone who expresses that thought will be ostracized (executed in the orignial story, but ostracism is the nonlethal modern alternative).
Just think of a New York Times journalist who came out and said twitter was crap and people who use twitter are self-absorbed idiots who shouldn't be trusted with the fourth estate's reponsibility to safeguard democracy.
His opinions would be attacked and discarded faster the Joe the Plumber.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675401</id>
	<title>The only real use for Twitter...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is microblogging important events from places with limited bandwidth, like a pro-democracy demonstration in Tehran.</p><p>Otherwise, the kid has it on the nose. Not that that's a surprise; it's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is microblogging important events from places with limited bandwidth , like a pro-democracy demonstration in Tehran.Otherwise , the kid has it on the nose .
Not that that 's a surprise ; it 's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... is microblogging important events from places with limited bandwidth, like a pro-democracy demonstration in Tehran.Otherwise, the kid has it on the nose.
Not that that's a surprise; it's just that he seems to be the only person with the courage to come out and say it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679141</id>
	<title>Communication for the current generation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247509440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He does have a point about a younger generation communicating through video games.  I, personally, feel that many remote business meetings that currently use cell phone "bridges" would be infinitely ameriliorated by use of Ventrilo server, or a similar service.  I mean, if you've ever had to join a bridge and sit for hours with your phone on speaker, running to the phone to un mute it, etc. it's a huge PITA. The sound quality is much better as well.  Just my 2 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He does have a point about a younger generation communicating through video games .
I , personally , feel that many remote business meetings that currently use cell phone " bridges " would be infinitely ameriliorated by use of Ventrilo server , or a similar service .
I mean , if you 've ever had to join a bridge and sit for hours with your phone on speaker , running to the phone to un mute it , etc .
it 's a huge PITA .
The sound quality is much better as well .
Just my 2 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He does have a point about a younger generation communicating through video games.
I, personally, feel that many remote business meetings that currently use cell phone "bridges" would be infinitely ameriliorated by use of Ventrilo server, or a similar service.
I mean, if you've ever had to join a bridge and sit for hours with your phone on speaker, running to the phone to un mute it, etc.
it's a huge PITA.
The sound quality is much better as well.
Just my 2 cents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675699</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the Report?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247497560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original report is here: http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original report is here : http : //media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original report is here: http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675411</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>speak for yourself, i chat more to my friends via xbox live than i do on my phone. mostly because you can see they're available, you know they're not busy, and it's only one button away</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>speak for yourself , i chat more to my friends via xbox live than i do on my phone .
mostly because you can see they 're available , you know they 're not busy , and it 's only one button away</tokentext>
<sentencetext>speak for yourself, i chat more to my friends via xbox live than i do on my phone.
mostly because you can see they're available, you know they're not busy, and it's only one button away</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675329</id>
	<title>Bleeding edge</title>
	<author>acehole</author>
	<datestamp>1247495820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once I read this report I tossed out my iphone and blackberry. I now walk around with the convenience of a xbox 360 and Playstation 3 strapped on each side of my hip. I also attach an atari 2600 to my chest for legacy situations.</p><p>Me: 1 Technology: 0</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once I read this report I tossed out my iphone and blackberry .
I now walk around with the convenience of a xbox 360 and Playstation 3 strapped on each side of my hip .
I also attach an atari 2600 to my chest for legacy situations.Me : 1 Technology : 0  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once I read this report I tossed out my iphone and blackberry.
I now walk around with the convenience of a xbox 360 and Playstation 3 strapped on each side of my hip.
I also attach an atari 2600 to my chest for legacy situations.Me: 1 Technology: 0
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675435</id>
	<title>Slurm</title>
	<author>pushf popf</author>
	<datestamp>1247496300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.</strong> <br> <br>

What it says is that most people working in "business" are disconnected from reality and produce nothing of value.<br> <br>

The only <strong>real</strong> problem is that some moron let this kid inside to see the Slurm factory and now he knows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 15-year-old " analyst " writes one of the most " clearest and most thought-provoking insights " for your publication , that says a lot more about your publication ( and the state of American journalism ) than the 15-year-old in question .
What it says is that most people working in " business " are disconnected from reality and produce nothing of value .
The only real problem is that some moron let this kid inside to see the Slurm factory and now he knows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.
What it says is that most people working in "business" are disconnected from reality and produce nothing of value.
The only real problem is that some moron let this kid inside to see the Slurm factory and now he knows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686741</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>nica</author>
	<datestamp>1247507580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't yell at you, but I want to.<br>So you've never tripped over something left on the floor in your home? You've never had a misstep because you were distracted?<br>Basically you called this girl a stupid bitch because she was distracted by her phone and fell into an open manhole, and therefore she shouldn't reproduce.<br>Someone left a manhole cover off. That person is the one who deserves all the hate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't yell at you , but I want to.So you 've never tripped over something left on the floor in your home ?
You 've never had a misstep because you were distracted ? Basically you called this girl a stupid bitch because she was distracted by her phone and fell into an open manhole , and therefore she should n't reproduce.Someone left a manhole cover off .
That person is the one who deserves all the hate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't yell at you, but I want to.So you've never tripped over something left on the floor in your home?
You've never had a misstep because you were distracted?Basically you called this girl a stupid bitch because she was distracted by her phone and fell into an open manhole, and therefore she shouldn't reproduce.Someone left a manhole cover off.
That person is the one who deserves all the hate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675719</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1247497680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've convinced me - Twitter is actually good!  The people who use it are absolutely NOT narcissists!  <p>Hint: he wasn't talking about the tool, he was talking about what people use the tool for.  His opinions are credible because anyone who attacks the underage is considered despicable (well, for now anyway...just wait until the "it's irresponsible and environment-destroying to be a parent" attitude gathers even more steam than it has already) and he's saying something that nobody is allowed to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've convinced me - Twitter is actually good !
The people who use it are absolutely NOT narcissists !
Hint : he was n't talking about the tool , he was talking about what people use the tool for .
His opinions are credible because anyone who attacks the underage is considered despicable ( well , for now anyway...just wait until the " it 's irresponsible and environment-destroying to be a parent " attitude gathers even more steam than it has already ) and he 's saying something that nobody is allowed to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've convinced me - Twitter is actually good!
The people who use it are absolutely NOT narcissists!
Hint: he wasn't talking about the tool, he was talking about what people use the tool for.
His opinions are credible because anyone who attacks the underage is considered despicable (well, for now anyway...just wait until the "it's irresponsible and environment-destroying to be a parent" attitude gathers even more steam than it has already) and he's saying something that nobody is allowed to say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</id>
	<title>Why is it...</title>
	<author>Ynsats</author>
	<datestamp>1247495760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble. Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling "analytical" report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he's a genius with social insight in to media tools?</p><p>Tools meaning things people use to communicate, like telephones (yes, they still have those). Not tools meaning the talking heads like the ones the reported on the 15 year old's report.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble .
Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling " analytical " report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he 's a genius with social insight in to media tools ? Tools meaning things people use to communicate , like telephones ( yes , they still have those ) .
Not tools meaning the talking heads like the ones the reported on the 15 year old 's report .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is and they get shot down as anti-pop babble.
Yet a 15 year old kid writes a dismissive and somewhat rambling "analytical" report saying that twitter is lame and a waste of time and all of a sudden he's a genius with social insight in to media tools?Tools meaning things people use to communicate, like telephones (yes, they still have those).
Not tools meaning the talking heads like the ones the reported on the 15 year old's report.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679733</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247511300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award.  Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.</p></div><p>I hope your joking.</p><p>If not it sounds like you seriously need a hug. Or your an angsty teen<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll get yelled at for saying this but it 's a pity she did n't earn herself a Darwin award .
Now she 's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.I hope your joking.If not it sounds like you seriously need a hug .
Or your an angsty teen : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award.
Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.I hope your joking.If not it sounds like you seriously need a hug.
Or your an angsty teen :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1247497800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was 15, I was in the 8th grade and a lot of girls didn't have breasts yet.  I barely had hair on my balls at that point, and having sex with a girl was something far, far away.  I remember me and a friend of mine used to shoplift condoms from K-Mart (repressed sexuality expressing itself the only way we knew how) and he gave some to the coolest kid in school.  I saw him later that day showing them off to his friends, as if he were some big guy who had sex so often that he needed a 12-pack of condoms.  This was in 1985 BTW.  Please stop assuming that today's attitudes are somehow universal or have any relevance beyond the here and now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was 15 , I was in the 8th grade and a lot of girls did n't have breasts yet .
I barely had hair on my balls at that point , and having sex with a girl was something far , far away .
I remember me and a friend of mine used to shoplift condoms from K-Mart ( repressed sexuality expressing itself the only way we knew how ) and he gave some to the coolest kid in school .
I saw him later that day showing them off to his friends , as if he were some big guy who had sex so often that he needed a 12-pack of condoms .
This was in 1985 BTW .
Please stop assuming that today 's attitudes are somehow universal or have any relevance beyond the here and now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was 15, I was in the 8th grade and a lot of girls didn't have breasts yet.
I barely had hair on my balls at that point, and having sex with a girl was something far, far away.
I remember me and a friend of mine used to shoplift condoms from K-Mart (repressed sexuality expressing itself the only way we knew how) and he gave some to the coolest kid in school.
I saw him later that day showing them off to his friends, as if he were some big guy who had sex so often that he needed a 12-pack of condoms.
This was in 1985 BTW.
Please stop assuming that today's attitudes are somehow universal or have any relevance beyond the here and now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676541</id>
	<title>Oh</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1247500920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought *all* market analysis was done by 15 year olds, except when they look at Apple products. Then they use the 12 year old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought * all * market analysis was done by 15 year olds , except when they look at Apple products .
Then they use the 12 year old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought *all* market analysis was done by 15 year olds, except when they look at Apple products.
Then they use the 12 year old.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675625</id>
	<title>Not like a phone</title>
	<author>qwerty shrdlu</author>
	<datestamp>1247497200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A game console is used in one particular room and  is tethered by wires. They have no buttons or dials, but in would be possible to
swing a Wii controller in a circular "cranking" motion to log on. Someone should patent this!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A game console is used in one particular room and is tethered by wires .
They have no buttons or dials , but in would be possible to swing a Wii controller in a circular " cranking " motion to log on .
Someone should patent this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A game console is used in one particular room and  is tethered by wires.
They have no buttons or dials, but in would be possible to
swing a Wii controller in a circular "cranking" motion to log on.
Someone should patent this!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676857</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1247501820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I just had this conversation with my wife! I was all like, I don't like chocolate ice cream, and she's all like, I have these friends who aren't kids and they DO like chocolate ice cream, and I'm like: Oh snap! What would possess a person to like chocolate ice cream when I, a respected member of the ice cream community, do not? The only explanation is that people with different tastes than me are either less intelligent or less mature than me."</p><p>The problem is that you're treating people's personal tastes in communication and entertainment in terms of logic (don't forget that FB, twitter, etc. serve an entertainment purpose). Your mistake- and maybe I'm wrong, who knows- is that you think that if two people are smart enough and mature enough, they'll eventually come to agree on things (everything?). You remind me of an older gent that I work with who harangues the guys in the shop who play WoW for "not achieving anything" while he spends his weekends putzing around on a motorcycle or fishing.</p><p>Different strokes.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I just had this conversation with my wife !
I was all like , I do n't like chocolate ice cream , and she 's all like , I have these friends who are n't kids and they DO like chocolate ice cream , and I 'm like : Oh snap !
What would possess a person to like chocolate ice cream when I , a respected member of the ice cream community , do not ?
The only explanation is that people with different tastes than me are either less intelligent or less mature than me .
" The problem is that you 're treating people 's personal tastes in communication and entertainment in terms of logic ( do n't forget that FB , twitter , etc .
serve an entertainment purpose ) .
Your mistake- and maybe I 'm wrong , who knows- is that you think that if two people are smart enough and mature enough , they 'll eventually come to agree on things ( everything ? ) .
You remind me of an older gent that I work with who harangues the guys in the shop who play WoW for " not achieving anything " while he spends his weekends putzing around on a motorcycle or fishing.Different strokes.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I just had this conversation with my wife!
I was all like, I don't like chocolate ice cream, and she's all like, I have these friends who aren't kids and they DO like chocolate ice cream, and I'm like: Oh snap!
What would possess a person to like chocolate ice cream when I, a respected member of the ice cream community, do not?
The only explanation is that people with different tastes than me are either less intelligent or less mature than me.
"The problem is that you're treating people's personal tastes in communication and entertainment in terms of logic (don't forget that FB, twitter, etc.
serve an entertainment purpose).
Your mistake- and maybe I'm wrong, who knows- is that you think that if two people are smart enough and mature enough, they'll eventually come to agree on things (everything?).
You remind me of an older gent that I work with who harangues the guys in the shop who play WoW for "not achieving anything" while he spends his weekends putzing around on a motorcycle or fishing.Different strokes.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28692941</id>
	<title>Ok..</title>
	<author>xmvince</author>
	<datestamp>1247594400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't everyone already know Twitter was a joke to eat up time + bandwidth?

I mean, what is the point of publishing your personal life to the net for trolls and anon's to read? If you really want to throw away your privacy or your mysterious lifestyle, just open up your spam folder and start responding to the spammers with legitimate data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't everyone already know Twitter was a joke to eat up time + bandwidth ?
I mean , what is the point of publishing your personal life to the net for trolls and anon 's to read ?
If you really want to throw away your privacy or your mysterious lifestyle , just open up your spam folder and start responding to the spammers with legitimate data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't everyone already know Twitter was a joke to eat up time + bandwidth?
I mean, what is the point of publishing your personal life to the net for trolls and anon's to read?
If you really want to throw away your privacy or your mysterious lifestyle, just open up your spam folder and start responding to the spammers with legitimate data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680611</id>
	<title>Read the report here...</title>
	<author>glodime</author>
	<datestamp>1247514300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Title: How Teenagers Consume Media<br>
<a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf" title="ft.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf</a> [ft.com] (That's the website of the Financial Times in case you were not sure.)<br> <br>

I would have considered "Impressions and preferences concerning media of one 15 year old boy growing up in the UK (London)" as an appropriate subtitle for the report. <br> <br>

Read the Financial Times article (the one that PCPro.co.uk refers to) here:</p><p>
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/035e83fe-6f18-11de-9109-00144feabdc0.html" title="ft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/035e83fe-6f18-11de-9109-00144feabdc0.html</a> [ft.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Title : How Teenagers Consume Media http : //media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf [ ft.com ] ( That 's the website of the Financial Times in case you were not sure .
) I would have considered " Impressions and preferences concerning media of one 15 year old boy growing up in the UK ( London ) " as an appropriate subtitle for the report .
Read the Financial Times article ( the one that PCPro.co.uk refers to ) here : http : //www.ft.com/cms/s/035e83fe-6f18-11de-9109-00144feabdc0.html [ ft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Title: How Teenagers Consume Media
http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf [ft.com] (That's the website of the Financial Times in case you were not sure.
) 

I would have considered "Impressions and preferences concerning media of one 15 year old boy growing up in the UK (London)" as an appropriate subtitle for the report.
Read the Financial Times article (the one that PCPro.co.uk refers to) here:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/035e83fe-6f18-11de-9109-00144feabdc0.html [ft.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686379</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>toppsoft</author>
	<datestamp>1247504760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The next regular report will, no doubt, assert with full statistical rigour that "Twitter is for twits". It's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception.</p><p>People don't "tweet", they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters. Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols (a motley collection of vacuous celebrities, sports stars, self-serving shills, and the like). Still, pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors. Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down.</p></div><p>The majority of blogs are a) abandoned and b) exercises in narcissism. Why would you expect microblogs (aka Twitter) to be any different?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next regular report will , no doubt , assert with full statistical rigour that " Twitter is for twits " .
It 's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception.People do n't " tweet " , they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters .
Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols ( a motley collection of vacuous celebrities , sports stars , self-serving shills , and the like ) .
Still , pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors .
Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down.The majority of blogs are a ) abandoned and b ) exercises in narcissism .
Why would you expect microblogs ( aka Twitter ) to be any different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next regular report will, no doubt, assert with full statistical rigour that "Twitter is for twits".
It's been manifestly evident to many of us since its very inception.People don't "tweet", they mostly be-twit themselves - sometimes quite impressively in only 140 characters.
Others merely follow the twaddle produced by their twit-idols (a motley collection of vacuous celebrities, sports stars, self-serving shills, and the like).
Still, pumping the hype on the way up was good for fleecing investors.
Presumably Morgan Stanley can now fleece them again on the way down.The majority of blogs are a) abandoned and b) exercises in narcissism.
Why would you expect microblogs (aka Twitter) to be any different?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680891</id>
	<title>TWITS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247515740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter and the vast majority of social networking communication is void of what sorely needed today</p><p>1) truth<br>2) meaning<br>3) language that conveys the 1st 2</p><p>Be it Facebook, MySpace but mostly Twitter, there is more communication but less is said and rarely, really understood universally. Its mostly inside and compartmentalized conversation of which was born of other meaningless interaction.</p><p>This is Gen N, for NARCISSCISM, as if anyone gives a rats ass what you think.</p><p>Twitter just proves what "Media Hype" can accomplish but that will only go so far.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Reach out and really touch someone, make a fucking phone call or better yet, get some face time, you witless twits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter and the vast majority of social networking communication is void of what sorely needed today1 ) truth2 ) meaning3 ) language that conveys the 1st 2Be it Facebook , MySpace but mostly Twitter , there is more communication but less is said and rarely , really understood universally .
Its mostly inside and compartmentalized conversation of which was born of other meaningless interaction.This is Gen N , for NARCISSCISM , as if anyone gives a rats ass what you think.Twitter just proves what " Media Hype " can accomplish but that will only go so far .
      Reach out and really touch someone , make a fucking phone call or better yet , get some face time , you witless twits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter and the vast majority of social networking communication is void of what sorely needed today1) truth2) meaning3) language that conveys the 1st 2Be it Facebook, MySpace but mostly Twitter, there is more communication but less is said and rarely, really understood universally.
Its mostly inside and compartmentalized conversation of which was born of other meaningless interaction.This is Gen N, for NARCISSCISM, as if anyone gives a rats ass what you think.Twitter just proves what "Media Hype" can accomplish but that will only go so far.
      Reach out and really touch someone, make a fucking phone call or better yet, get some face time, you witless twits!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675909</id>
	<title>Copy of Report</title>
	<author>ashtophoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1247498520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe someone has already posted it but I couldn't find it, after Googling here's what I found:

<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5817515/Teenager-causes-City-sensation-with-research-on-media-report-in-full.html" title="telegraph.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5817515/Teenager-causes-City-sensation-with-research-on-media-report-in-full.html</a> [telegraph.co.uk]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe someone has already posted it but I could n't find it , after Googling here 's what I found : http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5817515/Teenager-causes-City-sensation-with-research-on-media-report-in-full.html [ telegraph.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe someone has already posted it but I couldn't find it, after Googling here's what I found:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5817515/Teenager-causes-City-sensation-with-research-on-media-report-in-full.html [telegraph.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675487</id>
	<title>the child says: the emperor is naked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so what? it happend before and it will happen again: media hype, marketing hysteria etc. and then a child comes along and states the obvious: the emperor has no clothes on. Every politician tries to be hip and use twitter - but the void in their heads can not be turned into wisdom. and using a volatile medium like tweets does not help either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so what ?
it happend before and it will happen again : media hype , marketing hysteria etc .
and then a child comes along and states the obvious : the emperor has no clothes on .
Every politician tries to be hip and use twitter - but the void in their heads can not be turned into wisdom .
and using a volatile medium like tweets does not help either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what?
it happend before and it will happen again: media hype, marketing hysteria etc.
and then a child comes along and states the obvious: the emperor has no clothes on.
Every politician tries to be hip and use twitter - but the void in their heads can not be turned into wisdom.
and using a volatile medium like tweets does not help either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</id>
	<title>Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.</p><p>Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America") early bedtimes ("a gross violation of the constitution") and girls ("icky!") while we're at it?</p><p>Fucking embarrassing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 15-year-old " analyst " writes one of the most " clearest and most thought-provoking insights " for your publication , that says a lot more about your publication ( and the state of American journalism ) than the 15-year-old in question.Why do n't we ask him to write about homework ( " a near-epidemic in America " ) early bedtimes ( " a gross violation of the constitution " ) and girls ( " icky !
" ) while we 're at it ? Fucking embarrassing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America") early bedtimes ("a gross violation of the constitution") and girls ("icky!
") while we're at it?Fucking embarrassing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677191</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247502900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny, silly girl. But people with poor sight might also have missed that, and there are other reasons for people to not notice. A barrier is surely a necessity in such a situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , silly girl .
But people with poor sight might also have missed that , and there are other reasons for people to not notice .
A barrier is surely a necessity in such a situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, silly girl.
But people with poor sight might also have missed that, and there are other reasons for people to not notice.
A barrier is surely a necessity in such a situation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681717</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1247475720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Game consoles are fun, you should try them sometime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Game consoles are fun , you should try them sometime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Game consoles are fun, you should try them sometime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</id>
	<title>Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life. I mean I personally think that Twitter is one of the most ridiculous concepts imaginable and a site with horrible stability, but it has its place. I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia. Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones? How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them? None the less I don't think a game console is going to replace a cell phone, most people like the idea of the phone evolving from a backpack, I don't foresee that coming back. Of course this child only being 15 wouldn't remember that cell phones were that big at one point. This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst. If he doesn't by the time he is 40 it will be like the movie Falling Down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life .
I mean I personally think that Twitter is one of the most ridiculous concepts imaginable and a site with horrible stability , but it has its place .
I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia .
Twitter is one thing , but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones ?
How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them ?
None the less I do n't think a game console is going to replace a cell phone , most people like the idea of the phone evolving from a backpack , I do n't foresee that coming back .
Of course this child only being 15 would n't remember that cell phones were that big at one point .
This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst .
If he does n't by the time he is 40 it will be like the movie Falling Down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life.
I mean I personally think that Twitter is one of the most ridiculous concepts imaginable and a site with horrible stability, but it has its place.
I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia.
Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones?
How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them?
None the less I don't think a game console is going to replace a cell phone, most people like the idea of the phone evolving from a backpack, I don't foresee that coming back.
Of course this child only being 15 wouldn't remember that cell phones were that big at one point.
This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst.
If he doesn't by the time he is 40 it will be like the movie Falling Down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679707</id>
	<title>I guess teenagers fail at Twitter</title>
	<author>Synic</author>
	<datestamp>1247511180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If nobody is reading your tweets, then they fail due to one or more of the following:</p><p>1) You aren't saying anything worth reading<br>2) You don't know how to use retweet (RT) to publish replies to people you are following so that people can read them if they search for that person's @profilename<br>3) You don't participate in any hashtag groups</p><p>I'm guessing #1 is the worst problem, since teenagers usually have nothing to say that someone else hasn't already said in a more clever or amusing way, and then #2 and #3 are probably tied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If nobody is reading your tweets , then they fail due to one or more of the following : 1 ) You are n't saying anything worth reading2 ) You do n't know how to use retweet ( RT ) to publish replies to people you are following so that people can read them if they search for that person 's @ profilename3 ) You do n't participate in any hashtag groupsI 'm guessing # 1 is the worst problem , since teenagers usually have nothing to say that someone else has n't already said in a more clever or amusing way , and then # 2 and # 3 are probably tied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If nobody is reading your tweets, then they fail due to one or more of the following:1) You aren't saying anything worth reading2) You don't know how to use retweet (RT) to publish replies to people you are following so that people can read them if they search for that person's @profilename3) You don't participate in any hashtag groupsI'm guessing #1 is the worst problem, since teenagers usually have nothing to say that someone else hasn't already said in a more clever or amusing way, and then #2 and #3 are probably tied.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675825</id>
	<title>15 minutes</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1247498160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like after a decade or so, the "analysts" and "consultants" have finally come around to doing the math on the famous "15 minutes of fame" for everybody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like after a decade or so , the " analysts " and " consultants " have finally come around to doing the math on the famous " 15 minutes of fame " for everybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like after a decade or so, the "analysts" and "consultants" have finally come around to doing the math on the famous "15 minutes of fame" for everybody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676355</id>
	<title>Game Consoles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consoles are in no way replacing mobile phones.  This particular kid evidently has a 360/PS3, and is extrapolating his personal experiences vis-a-vis COD/Halo, to everyone else on earth.  The average female (of any age) does not own either console, and the average male (above the age of 18), may own one (inversely correlated with age), but probably spends very little time using it to chat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consoles are in no way replacing mobile phones .
This particular kid evidently has a 360/PS3 , and is extrapolating his personal experiences vis-a-vis COD/Halo , to everyone else on earth .
The average female ( of any age ) does not own either console , and the average male ( above the age of 18 ) , may own one ( inversely correlated with age ) , but probably spends very little time using it to chat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consoles are in no way replacing mobile phones.
This particular kid evidently has a 360/PS3, and is extrapolating his personal experiences vis-a-vis COD/Halo, to everyone else on earth.
The average female (of any age) does not own either console, and the average male (above the age of 18), may own one (inversely correlated with age), but probably spends very little time using it to chat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679921</id>
	<title>Twitter IS useful-- just not in that way</title>
	<author>Asmor</author>
	<datestamp>1247511840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mainstream media are parasites who try to monetize anything. They're going to fail at that with respect to twitter, because frankly twitter sucks <i>for that purpose</i>.</p><p>What twitter really is, though, is basically a giant 24-hour chat room filled exclusively with people you actually care to chat with. The RPG blogging community, for example, is quite active on twitter discussing things with each other, sharing links with each other, etc. And it really is a discussion-- people read each others' tweets, respond to them, useful ideas are created, evolved and exchanged.</p><p>The MSM sees a bunch of people and sees dollar signs... The problem with that idea is that you have to voluntarily elect to follow someone, so no one who's actually reading tweets is going to sign themselves up for a bunch of spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mainstream media are parasites who try to monetize anything .
They 're going to fail at that with respect to twitter , because frankly twitter sucks for that purpose.What twitter really is , though , is basically a giant 24-hour chat room filled exclusively with people you actually care to chat with .
The RPG blogging community , for example , is quite active on twitter discussing things with each other , sharing links with each other , etc .
And it really is a discussion-- people read each others ' tweets , respond to them , useful ideas are created , evolved and exchanged.The MSM sees a bunch of people and sees dollar signs... The problem with that idea is that you have to voluntarily elect to follow someone , so no one who 's actually reading tweets is going to sign themselves up for a bunch of spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mainstream media are parasites who try to monetize anything.
They're going to fail at that with respect to twitter, because frankly twitter sucks for that purpose.What twitter really is, though, is basically a giant 24-hour chat room filled exclusively with people you actually care to chat with.
The RPG blogging community, for example, is quite active on twitter discussing things with each other, sharing links with each other, etc.
And it really is a discussion-- people read each others' tweets, respond to them, useful ideas are created, evolved and exchanged.The MSM sees a bunch of people and sees dollar signs... The problem with that idea is that you have to voluntarily elect to follow someone, so no one who's actually reading tweets is going to sign themselves up for a bunch of spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675575</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>SIR\_Taco</author>
	<datestamp>1247497020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?<br>Because all of these parents that thought they were 'hip and cool' for using Twitter to impress their kids, are now shown the harsh reality that their kids didn't have the heart to tell them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ? Because all of these parents that thought they were 'hip and cool ' for using Twitter to impress their kids , are now shown the harsh reality that their kids did n't have the heart to tell them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?Because all of these parents that thought they were 'hip and cool' for using Twitter to impress their kids, are now shown the harsh reality that their kids didn't have the heart to tell them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429</id>
	<title>Where's the Report?</title>
	<author>FreeUser</author>
	<datestamp>1247496240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone actually found the damn report?  As another pointed out, google search is so polluted with 2nd and 3rd hand accounts that googling the report is singulary unrevealing (or perhaps more accurately: multiplicatively unrevealing).  Unlike other snarky comments here, I wouldn't be surprised if this kid's observations weren't dead on.  I'm unsurprised twitter is considered passe, I'm unsurprised that teenagers are finding better ways to chat than SMS messages pecked out on a cell phone number pad, and I'm unsurprised that teenagers are abandoning television and print media as primary information sources, given how often those expensive and slow media forms have been shown to be inaccurate, overtly deceptive, and (worst of all for a young person) utterly out of touch with the zeitgeist of the moment.</p><p>About the only surprise in the captions is that young people are using gaming consoles more than other media for chatting, but that may be down to me not being a gamer.  In any event, I'd like to read the report before passing judgement, and particularly befor joining the jaded, knee-jerk reaction of "the kid's clueless, we shouldn't listen" mantra that seems to have become so common on slashdot (and makes us all sound like cranky old men, even more out of touch with the world's current trends than the Old Media).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone actually found the damn report ?
As another pointed out , google search is so polluted with 2nd and 3rd hand accounts that googling the report is singulary unrevealing ( or perhaps more accurately : multiplicatively unrevealing ) .
Unlike other snarky comments here , I would n't be surprised if this kid 's observations were n't dead on .
I 'm unsurprised twitter is considered passe , I 'm unsurprised that teenagers are finding better ways to chat than SMS messages pecked out on a cell phone number pad , and I 'm unsurprised that teenagers are abandoning television and print media as primary information sources , given how often those expensive and slow media forms have been shown to be inaccurate , overtly deceptive , and ( worst of all for a young person ) utterly out of touch with the zeitgeist of the moment.About the only surprise in the captions is that young people are using gaming consoles more than other media for chatting , but that may be down to me not being a gamer .
In any event , I 'd like to read the report before passing judgement , and particularly befor joining the jaded , knee-jerk reaction of " the kid 's clueless , we should n't listen " mantra that seems to have become so common on slashdot ( and makes us all sound like cranky old men , even more out of touch with the world 's current trends than the Old Media ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone actually found the damn report?
As another pointed out, google search is so polluted with 2nd and 3rd hand accounts that googling the report is singulary unrevealing (or perhaps more accurately: multiplicatively unrevealing).
Unlike other snarky comments here, I wouldn't be surprised if this kid's observations weren't dead on.
I'm unsurprised twitter is considered passe, I'm unsurprised that teenagers are finding better ways to chat than SMS messages pecked out on a cell phone number pad, and I'm unsurprised that teenagers are abandoning television and print media as primary information sources, given how often those expensive and slow media forms have been shown to be inaccurate, overtly deceptive, and (worst of all for a young person) utterly out of touch with the zeitgeist of the moment.About the only surprise in the captions is that young people are using gaming consoles more than other media for chatting, but that may be down to me not being a gamer.
In any event, I'd like to read the report before passing judgement, and particularly befor joining the jaded, knee-jerk reaction of "the kid's clueless, we shouldn't listen" mantra that seems to have become so common on slashdot (and makes us all sound like cranky old men, even more out of touch with the world's current trends than the Old Media).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683299</id>
	<title>PS</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247482500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>just like to bitch, or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down.</i></p><p>Just like to bitch, or slagging off other things? He should write a report for Morgan Stanley...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just like to bitch , or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down.Just like to bitch , or slagging off other things ?
He should write a report for Morgan Stanley.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just like to bitch, or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down.Just like to bitch, or slagging off other things?
He should write a report for Morgan Stanley...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677575</id>
	<title>ClueLess</title>
	<author>N8F8</author>
	<datestamp>1247504280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter barely has a profile feature.  Sounds more like the kid was clueless about Twitter.</p><p>I do agree about the exodus from mainstream media.  I opened a coffee shop and have discovered the hard way how litigious copyright companies like ASCAP and BMI are strangling the music industry for amateurs. Few can afford to fork over thousands a year for the privilege of having Open Mic nights. So now I wholeheartedly support the Creative Commons music movement:  www.jamendo.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter barely has a profile feature .
Sounds more like the kid was clueless about Twitter.I do agree about the exodus from mainstream media .
I opened a coffee shop and have discovered the hard way how litigious copyright companies like ASCAP and BMI are strangling the music industry for amateurs .
Few can afford to fork over thousands a year for the privilege of having Open Mic nights .
So now I wholeheartedly support the Creative Commons music movement : www.jamendo.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter barely has a profile feature.
Sounds more like the kid was clueless about Twitter.I do agree about the exodus from mainstream media.
I opened a coffee shop and have discovered the hard way how litigious copyright companies like ASCAP and BMI are strangling the music industry for amateurs.
Few can afford to fork over thousands a year for the privilege of having Open Mic nights.
So now I wholeheartedly support the Creative Commons music movement:  www.jamendo.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686477</id>
	<title>Just a tool.</title>
	<author>The Bastard</author>
	<datestamp>1247505420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never really hopped on board the Twitter is the next big thing bandwagon myself. To me, it's just a new version of IM with an open API and a couple new features. Of course, IM has never been a big deal to me either, since my "oooh,ahhh!" real-time chat stage finished in the '80s with VAX/VMS phone and UN*X talk.</p><p>That said, I do have a Twitter account, and see it as having some good uses beyond following the blather of some celebrity.  For me, it's a news feed (Sun, DeveloperWorks, new publications, etc); it's a way to be an active participant in a conference--whether it's 1000 miles away (like last Friday's Crunchup), or going on around me (like a BarCamp); or to advertise my current personal projects and blog entries.</p><p>The biggest hype I have for Twitter is that it's perfect for conference participation and conversation material for Q&amp;A panels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never really hopped on board the Twitter is the next big thing bandwagon myself .
To me , it 's just a new version of IM with an open API and a couple new features .
Of course , IM has never been a big deal to me either , since my " oooh,ahhh !
" real-time chat stage finished in the '80s with VAX/VMS phone and UN * X talk.That said , I do have a Twitter account , and see it as having some good uses beyond following the blather of some celebrity .
For me , it 's a news feed ( Sun , DeveloperWorks , new publications , etc ) ; it 's a way to be an active participant in a conference--whether it 's 1000 miles away ( like last Friday 's Crunchup ) , or going on around me ( like a BarCamp ) ; or to advertise my current personal projects and blog entries.The biggest hype I have for Twitter is that it 's perfect for conference participation and conversation material for Q&amp;A panels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never really hopped on board the Twitter is the next big thing bandwagon myself.
To me, it's just a new version of IM with an open API and a couple new features.
Of course, IM has never been a big deal to me either, since my "oooh,ahhh!
" real-time chat stage finished in the '80s with VAX/VMS phone and UN*X talk.That said, I do have a Twitter account, and see it as having some good uses beyond following the blather of some celebrity.
For me, it's a news feed (Sun, DeveloperWorks, new publications, etc); it's a way to be an active participant in a conference--whether it's 1000 miles away (like last Friday's Crunchup), or going on around me (like a BarCamp); or to advertise my current personal projects and blog entries.The biggest hype I have for Twitter is that it's perfect for conference participation and conversation material for Q&amp;A panels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678281</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>ioshhdflwuegfh</author>
	<datestamp>1247506560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously,[...]</p></div><p>Seriously, sounds like you have some strange sounds in your head.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , [ ... ] Seriously , sounds like you have some strange sounds in your head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously,[...]Seriously, sounds like you have some strange sounds in your head.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675361</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, "texting" as a means of talking to friends never actually replaced, well, "talking to friends" as a method for talking to friends.<br>
<br>
I'm also seeing a lot of angry flames about this kids analysis. Perhaps you should all go Tweet about that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , " texting " as a means of talking to friends never actually replaced , well , " talking to friends " as a method for talking to friends .
I 'm also seeing a lot of angry flames about this kids analysis .
Perhaps you should all go Tweet about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, "texting" as a means of talking to friends never actually replaced, well, "talking to friends" as a method for talking to friends.
I'm also seeing a lot of angry flames about this kids analysis.
Perhaps you should all go Tweet about that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676617</id>
	<title>twitter in iran:  was that a talking point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247501100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you believe that crap about twitter helping in Iran?<br>I was watching the talking monkeys on the news channel who<br>kept trying to get Iranians to say this but<br>the Iranians were like 'no'.  The<br>newsreaders must have been told to ask<br>this by their handlers.  Shameful marketting<br>while real people are being killed.</p><p>Micro blogging has been around since<br>the early days of the Internet<br>Twitter is being heavily marketted by<br>the usual suspects.  If you believe their<br>press-releases and their marketting<br>then you are a fool.</p><p>Twitter is for twits.  It will not survive.<br>People who give away lists of their friends<br>to corporate money whores are fools.</p><p>You can do your own site with very short amount<br>of work and all of your stuff with be yours and not theirs.</p><p>I never heard of twitter before January.  Blogging, I heard about<br>that ten years ago.  All twitter is:  A corporation that is branding blogging.</p><p>Facebook, Myspace:  same thing.  You are making a mistake if you<br>use these as you no longer have control over your data.  The soviets<br>took lists like these and started killing people in the 1920's.<br>Let's hope that doesn't happen but . . . the same forces are at work today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you believe that crap about twitter helping in Iran ? I was watching the talking monkeys on the news channel whokept trying to get Iranians to say this butthe Iranians were like 'no' .
Thenewsreaders must have been told to askthis by their handlers .
Shameful markettingwhile real people are being killed.Micro blogging has been around sincethe early days of the InternetTwitter is being heavily marketted bythe usual suspects .
If you believe theirpress-releases and their markettingthen you are a fool.Twitter is for twits .
It will not survive.People who give away lists of their friendsto corporate money whores are fools.You can do your own site with very short amountof work and all of your stuff with be yours and not theirs.I never heard of twitter before January .
Blogging , I heard aboutthat ten years ago .
All twitter is : A corporation that is branding blogging.Facebook , Myspace : same thing .
You are making a mistake if youuse these as you no longer have control over your data .
The sovietstook lists like these and started killing people in the 1920 's.Let 's hope that does n't happen but .
. .
the same forces are at work today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you believe that crap about twitter helping in Iran?I was watching the talking monkeys on the news channel whokept trying to get Iranians to say this butthe Iranians were like 'no'.
Thenewsreaders must have been told to askthis by their handlers.
Shameful markettingwhile real people are being killed.Micro blogging has been around sincethe early days of the InternetTwitter is being heavily marketted bythe usual suspects.
If you believe theirpress-releases and their markettingthen you are a fool.Twitter is for twits.
It will not survive.People who give away lists of their friendsto corporate money whores are fools.You can do your own site with very short amountof work and all of your stuff with be yours and not theirs.I never heard of twitter before January.
Blogging, I heard aboutthat ten years ago.
All twitter is:  A corporation that is branding blogging.Facebook, Myspace:  same thing.
You are making a mistake if youuse these as you no longer have control over your data.
The sovietstook lists like these and started killing people in the 1920's.Let's hope that doesn't happen but .
. .
the same forces are at work today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679701</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247511180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</p></div><p>This "Morgan Stanley" chap- is he Captain Obvious's secret identity?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Morgan Stanley points out that Robson 's assessment of the media landscape does n't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.This " Morgan Stanley " chap- is he Captain Obvious 's secret identity ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.This "Morgan Stanley" chap- is he Captain Obvious's secret identity?
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675385</id>
	<title>The reason behind this report</title>
	<author>synthesizerpatel</author>
	<datestamp>1247496060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like Morgan Stanley feels that this point is so blatantly obvious that it even by delivering it via a virtual nobody from the demographic that twitter is supposed to be the most popular with wouldn't dilute the truth.</p><p>However, while I think twitter is pretty boring myself you do have to admit -- if you're a 15 year old kid writing research reports for Morgan Stanley odds are you don't have the pulse of social networking trends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like Morgan Stanley feels that this point is so blatantly obvious that it even by delivering it via a virtual nobody from the demographic that twitter is supposed to be the most popular with would n't dilute the truth.However , while I think twitter is pretty boring myself you do have to admit -- if you 're a 15 year old kid writing research reports for Morgan Stanley odds are you do n't have the pulse of social networking trends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like Morgan Stanley feels that this point is so blatantly obvious that it even by delivering it via a virtual nobody from the demographic that twitter is supposed to be the most popular with wouldn't dilute the truth.However, while I think twitter is pretty boring myself you do have to admit -- if you're a 15 year old kid writing research reports for Morgan Stanley odds are you don't have the pulse of social networking trends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679175</id>
	<title>I Agree</title>
	<author>calvinandhobbes</author>
	<datestamp>1247509560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in India and 90\% of 15 year olds don't access the internet. They wouldn't even know Microsoft or Google, forget twitter. i and technically literate and i write a blog sometimes, but i still don't get it, why should i text tweets or update my status every few hours? twitter is just a big bubble waiting to burst when people realize its fun no more</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in India and 90 \ % of 15 year olds do n't access the internet .
They would n't even know Microsoft or Google , forget twitter .
i and technically literate and i write a blog sometimes , but i still do n't get it , why should i text tweets or update my status every few hours ?
twitter is just a big bubble waiting to burst when people realize its fun no more</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in India and 90\% of 15 year olds don't access the internet.
They wouldn't even know Microsoft or Google, forget twitter.
i and technically literate and i write a blog sometimes, but i still don't get it, why should i text tweets or update my status every few hours?
twitter is just a big bubble waiting to burst when people realize its fun no more</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675685</id>
	<title>Teenager in "reading newspapers is boring" shocker</title>
	<author>webreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1247497500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, the Pope tweets that he's thinking of becoming a catholic, and bear posts "took a sh*t in the woods" as facebook status.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , the Pope tweets that he 's thinking of becoming a catholic , and bear posts " took a sh * t in the woods " as facebook status .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, the Pope tweets that he's thinking of becoming a catholic, and bear posts "took a sh*t in the woods" as facebook status.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675741</id>
	<title>Ooh, I can do this!</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1247497740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ooh, ooh!</p><p>35 year old men don't play golf. I mean, I'm 35 and I know a few 35 year olds, and none of us play golf.</p><p>Shower gratitude on me for my unique insight. Better sell all your shares in the golf industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooh , ooh ! 35 year old men do n't play golf .
I mean , I 'm 35 and I know a few 35 year olds , and none of us play golf.Shower gratitude on me for my unique insight .
Better sell all your shares in the golf industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooh, ooh!35 year old men don't play golf.
I mean, I'm 35 and I know a few 35 year olds, and none of us play golf.Shower gratitude on me for my unique insight.
Better sell all your shares in the golf industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676533</id>
	<title>Re:I've Heard This Story Before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, after reading the article, here's the main point I gleaned from it.  Teenagers are cheap and don't like paying for their media, whatever that media may be.  MP3s, DVDs, movies, games, even phone usage.  They don't have the resources to get them, so they resort to piracy to get it or restrict its usage.  It's not that Twitter is pointless (other articles could make this point), but the value they see in it is minimal because sending/receiving tweets costs them a text message they would rather send to their friends.<br> <br>

Honestly, this is getting a lot of traction for nothing.  The hype machine wins again.<br> <br>

Another point that struck me was the contradictions in the piece.  PC gaming is apparently unpopular among teenagers as the upgrade costs make it prohibitive, but PC gaming is also the one avenue which is pointed out that you can get games for free.  However, you have to buy console games.  Go figure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , after reading the article , here 's the main point I gleaned from it .
Teenagers are cheap and do n't like paying for their media , whatever that media may be .
MP3s , DVDs , movies , games , even phone usage .
They do n't have the resources to get them , so they resort to piracy to get it or restrict its usage .
It 's not that Twitter is pointless ( other articles could make this point ) , but the value they see in it is minimal because sending/receiving tweets costs them a text message they would rather send to their friends .
Honestly , this is getting a lot of traction for nothing .
The hype machine wins again .
Another point that struck me was the contradictions in the piece .
PC gaming is apparently unpopular among teenagers as the upgrade costs make it prohibitive , but PC gaming is also the one avenue which is pointed out that you can get games for free .
However , you have to buy console games .
Go figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, after reading the article, here's the main point I gleaned from it.
Teenagers are cheap and don't like paying for their media, whatever that media may be.
MP3s, DVDs, movies, games, even phone usage.
They don't have the resources to get them, so they resort to piracy to get it or restrict its usage.
It's not that Twitter is pointless (other articles could make this point), but the value they see in it is minimal because sending/receiving tweets costs them a text message they would rather send to their friends.
Honestly, this is getting a lot of traction for nothing.
The hype machine wins again.
Another point that struck me was the contradictions in the piece.
PC gaming is apparently unpopular among teenagers as the upgrade costs make it prohibitive, but PC gaming is also the one avenue which is pointed out that you can get games for free.
However, you have to buy console games.
Go figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677347</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>Bertie</author>
	<datestamp>1247503560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All it does is facilitate communication.  People have always talked about you without you knowing it.  Facebook just makes you more aware that they're doing it.  As always, social etiquette will adjust slightly around it and we'll carry on just fine.</p><p>I mean, I remember when caller ID started to come in and callers would feel mildly freaked by the person answering the phone addressing them directly, without having to go through the till-then-normal procedure of identification at the start of the call.  It disrupted one of those little rituals we're all more dependent on than we realise.  Now we all just take it in our stride.</p><p>Similarly, you'll get used to seeing your friends talking about you, and they'll get used to the idea that they're exposing your activities to a lot of people's attention, and will probably become more discreet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All it does is facilitate communication .
People have always talked about you without you knowing it .
Facebook just makes you more aware that they 're doing it .
As always , social etiquette will adjust slightly around it and we 'll carry on just fine.I mean , I remember when caller ID started to come in and callers would feel mildly freaked by the person answering the phone addressing them directly , without having to go through the till-then-normal procedure of identification at the start of the call .
It disrupted one of those little rituals we 're all more dependent on than we realise .
Now we all just take it in our stride.Similarly , you 'll get used to seeing your friends talking about you , and they 'll get used to the idea that they 're exposing your activities to a lot of people 's attention , and will probably become more discreet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All it does is facilitate communication.
People have always talked about you without you knowing it.
Facebook just makes you more aware that they're doing it.
As always, social etiquette will adjust slightly around it and we'll carry on just fine.I mean, I remember when caller ID started to come in and callers would feel mildly freaked by the person answering the phone addressing them directly, without having to go through the till-then-normal procedure of identification at the start of the call.
It disrupted one of those little rituals we're all more dependent on than we realise.
Now we all just take it in our stride.Similarly, you'll get used to seeing your friends talking about you, and they'll get used to the idea that they're exposing your activities to a lot of people's attention, and will probably become more discreet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675325</id>
	<title>Wow...</title>
	<author>XPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1247495760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I thought me being 15 and reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. was geeky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I thought me being 15 and reading / .
was geeky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I thought me being 15 and reading /.
was geeky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675459</id>
	<title>Re:Bleeding edge</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just fscking literally lol'd and spit out my coffee.</p><p>You owe me a new keyboard sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just fscking literally lol 'd and spit out my coffee.You owe me a new keyboard sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just fscking literally lol'd and spit out my coffee.You owe me a new keyboard sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676235</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky' would enter a boy's mind at this age when asked about girls.</p></div><p>When I was fifteen, I would have gotten hard on if someone asked me about girls. I would be in the bathroom a few minutes later "relieving some stress".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky ' would enter a boy 's mind at this age when asked about girls.When I was fifteen , I would have gotten hard on if someone asked me about girls .
I would be in the bathroom a few minutes later " relieving some stress " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky' would enter a boy's mind at this age when asked about girls.When I was fifteen, I would have gotten hard on if someone asked me about girls.
I would be in the bathroom a few minutes later "relieving some stress".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676221</id>
	<title>Here is the full report:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>twttr suxz0rz l0lz<br>cu l8tr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>twttr suxz0rz l0lzcu l8tr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>twttr suxz0rz l0lzcu l8tr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675479</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A 15yr old boy that thinks girls or icky???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A 15yr old boy that thinks girls or icky ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 15yr old boy that thinks girls or icky??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28825781</id>
	<title>anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1248608520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People keep saying that this article doesn't apply to the whole age group and how dare he assume he knows anything about anything outside his friends. Ok. I read the article and it's pretty fucking on target. I am in the sameish age group and I live on the other side of the world and the only thing that differs from California's middle class teen are the specific services and websites he says he uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People keep saying that this article does n't apply to the whole age group and how dare he assume he knows anything about anything outside his friends .
Ok. I read the article and it 's pretty fucking on target .
I am in the sameish age group and I live on the other side of the world and the only thing that differs from California 's middle class teen are the specific services and websites he says he uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People keep saying that this article doesn't apply to the whole age group and how dare he assume he knows anything about anything outside his friends.
Ok. I read the article and it's pretty fucking on target.
I am in the sameish age group and I live on the other side of the world and the only thing that differs from California's middle class teen are the specific services and websites he says he uses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675715</id>
	<title>Game consoles for chat...</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1247497680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My 21 year old brother chats with his friends through his game console... my 30+ year old neighbor does the same.</p><p>What do they have in common? They like playing games and they're both guys. I wouldn't expect my neighbors wife or the 16 year old girl down the street to fire up the PS3 or XBOX to chat with her girlfriends though why that's any different than using MySpace or Facebook as a chat board I couldn't tell you.... only that the girls want to be able to chat ALL THE TIME - so that cellphone isn't going anywhere.</p><p>Twitter as social networking for teens IS a fad. They're all fads for teens. As a micro-blogging tool OTOH, those teens who have a use for it will continue to use it, the rest will get too busy with the next thing that comes along or maybe just bars, parties, getting laid, etc. Twitter could still be used to broadcast where the hot bar is, or the next party and it could get you laid as a rexult - so teens/20somes will keep using it for that if nothing else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My 21 year old brother chats with his friends through his game console... my 30 + year old neighbor does the same.What do they have in common ?
They like playing games and they 're both guys .
I would n't expect my neighbors wife or the 16 year old girl down the street to fire up the PS3 or XBOX to chat with her girlfriends though why that 's any different than using MySpace or Facebook as a chat board I could n't tell you.... only that the girls want to be able to chat ALL THE TIME - so that cellphone is n't going anywhere.Twitter as social networking for teens IS a fad .
They 're all fads for teens .
As a micro-blogging tool OTOH , those teens who have a use for it will continue to use it , the rest will get too busy with the next thing that comes along or maybe just bars , parties , getting laid , etc .
Twitter could still be used to broadcast where the hot bar is , or the next party and it could get you laid as a rexult - so teens/20somes will keep using it for that if nothing else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My 21 year old brother chats with his friends through his game console... my 30+ year old neighbor does the same.What do they have in common?
They like playing games and they're both guys.
I wouldn't expect my neighbors wife or the 16 year old girl down the street to fire up the PS3 or XBOX to chat with her girlfriends though why that's any different than using MySpace or Facebook as a chat board I couldn't tell you.... only that the girls want to be able to chat ALL THE TIME - so that cellphone isn't going anywhere.Twitter as social networking for teens IS a fad.
They're all fads for teens.
As a micro-blogging tool OTOH, those teens who have a use for it will continue to use it, the rest will get too busy with the next thing that comes along or maybe just bars, parties, getting laid, etc.
Twitter could still be used to broadcast where the hot bar is, or the next party and it could get you laid as a rexult - so teens/20somes will keep using it for that if nothing else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677263</id>
	<title>Report?</title>
	<author>Zebra\_X</author>
	<datestamp>1247503200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean I'm all for verbally lashing young whipper snappers, but the report in question does not seem to be available from the site. All we have is some paraphrased version of the report that doesn't really make a great deal of sense. I don't think think that anyone would claim the xbox or ps3 is overtaking the cell phone for "messaging". Surely these comments came with some sort of bounds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean I 'm all for verbally lashing young whipper snappers , but the report in question does not seem to be available from the site .
All we have is some paraphrased version of the report that does n't really make a great deal of sense .
I do n't think think that anyone would claim the xbox or ps3 is overtaking the cell phone for " messaging " .
Surely these comments came with some sort of bounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean I'm all for verbally lashing young whipper snappers, but the report in question does not seem to be available from the site.
All we have is some paraphrased version of the report that doesn't really make a great deal of sense.
I don't think think that anyone would claim the xbox or ps3 is overtaking the cell phone for "messaging".
Surely these comments came with some sort of bounds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676393</id>
	<title>This kid is not a hero but a sell-out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, so this kid<br>is telling these rats what other kids do so<br>they can use psychology against these<br>kids.</p><p>If they cared about kids<br>they would stop marketting to them like<br>they do.</p><p>KIDS:  These guys don't care about you.<br>They are money whores and you should not trust them.</p><p>They will tell you to get degrees in science and engienering<br>so you can be their slaves.<br>Meanwhile their children study psychology and operant conditioning<br>to make you dance like trained monkeys.</p><p>Don't help these bastards.  Keep your secrets secret.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , so this kidis telling these rats what other kids do sothey can use psychology against thesekids.If they cared about kidsthey would stop marketting to them likethey do.KIDS : These guys do n't care about you.They are money whores and you should not trust them.They will tell you to get degrees in science and engieneringso you can be their slaves.Meanwhile their children study psychology and operant conditioningto make you dance like trained monkeys.Do n't help these bastards .
Keep your secrets secret .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, so this kidis telling these rats what other kids do sothey can use psychology against thesekids.If they cared about kidsthey would stop marketting to them likethey do.KIDS:  These guys don't care about you.They are money whores and you should not trust them.They will tell you to get degrees in science and engieneringso you can be their slaves.Meanwhile their children study psychology and operant conditioningto make you dance like trained monkeys.Don't help these bastards.
Keep your secrets secret.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675451</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1247496420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.</i></p><p>Yeah, but ten year olds grow quickly into most industries' key demographic, and yesterday's toys becomes tomorrow's Engines of Commerce.  Time was (and not too long ago) that MySpace/Social Networking was the stomping ground of teens and the pervs who pretended they were teens.  People working in the "real" web space treated it with scorn (not saying it was not well deserved, but let's stay on message here...), regarding it as that generation's GeoCities, assuming that as the users grew up they would launch their own websites outside of the social networking space if they still had the vanity/blogging bug.  And people working in that real web space were wrong.  In spades.</p><p>So, yeah, I can understand why a mostly-coherent report on networking trends by a 15 year-old (with Morgan Stanley's imprimatur) is getting some buzz.  Nobody wants to miss the bus twice in a row.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe for 10 year olds , but certainly not for the rest of us.Yeah , but ten year olds grow quickly into most industries ' key demographic , and yesterday 's toys becomes tomorrow 's Engines of Commerce .
Time was ( and not too long ago ) that MySpace/Social Networking was the stomping ground of teens and the pervs who pretended they were teens .
People working in the " real " web space treated it with scorn ( not saying it was not well deserved , but let 's stay on message here... ) , regarding it as that generation 's GeoCities , assuming that as the users grew up they would launch their own websites outside of the social networking space if they still had the vanity/blogging bug .
And people working in that real web space were wrong .
In spades.So , yeah , I can understand why a mostly-coherent report on networking trends by a 15 year-old ( with Morgan Stanley 's imprimatur ) is getting some buzz .
Nobody wants to miss the bus twice in a row .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe for 10 year olds, but certainly not for the rest of us.Yeah, but ten year olds grow quickly into most industries' key demographic, and yesterday's toys becomes tomorrow's Engines of Commerce.
Time was (and not too long ago) that MySpace/Social Networking was the stomping ground of teens and the pervs who pretended they were teens.
People working in the "real" web space treated it with scorn (not saying it was not well deserved, but let's stay on message here...), regarding it as that generation's GeoCities, assuming that as the users grew up they would launch their own websites outside of the social networking space if they still had the vanity/blogging bug.
And people working in that real web space were wrong.
In spades.So, yeah, I can understand why a mostly-coherent report on networking trends by a 15 year-old (with Morgan Stanley's imprimatur) is getting some buzz.
Nobody wants to miss the bus twice in a row.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247504280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You left out Twitter and Facebook suckered large numbers of Iranian and Guatemalan young people in to posting anti government rants on them, thinking they were going to overthrow their government with Twitter.  Now that's a laugh.   It was a stellar part of the Twitter hype to make everyone think Twitter would lead to an instantaneous outbreak of Democracy across the globe. CNN was a leading purveyor of this myth.  Since CNN has pretty much ceased to function as a news network all they have left to do is grasp at straws in the form of Twitter, Facebook and iReport.  They kind of missed the fact its nearly impossible to verify anything you get from the anonymous public, or to have any confidence in the source.  Howard Stern pranks proved this.</p><p>Note to wanna be young Iranian rebels, Iran monitors all Internet traffic so using Twitter in the clear provides the Basij with an instantaneous mechanism to identify, arrest and track you and your rabble-rouser friends.  Note to all future young wanna be rebels, all your internet activities are probably being watched.  Your Twitter and Facebook pages aren't a good place to organize a revolution unless you really know what you are doing.  Don't use them unless you are using anonymous WiFi stolen from your neighbor so they get busted instead, or a very good anonymizer like Tor.  Try reading Cory Doctorow's Little Brother so you will at least be in the correct mind set for interacting with authoritarian governments who use computers to oppress their people, like Iran, Russia... and the U.S.</p><p>"Little Brother" is a somewhat flawed work but at least it teaches paranoia.  Note to Linux community, someone really needs to put together Paranoid Linux and XNet with Tor, gnupg, WiFi sniffers, security tools, etc. and make sure computer noobs who want to overthrow their out of control governments have it, and can use it out of the box even if they are noobs.</p><p>There is a reason the NSA is building two giant new data centers in Utah and San Antonio and expanding the one in Maryland.  They appear to be preparing to spy on a whole lot more communications traffic than they already are.  Anyone who think America's bout with Big Brother ended when Obama replaced Bush are sadly mistaken.  The Democrats are just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy all our civil liberties as the Cheneyists were.</p><p>A burning question of the 21st century is if computers will liberate us or enslave us.  The paradoxical answer is they will probably do both at the same time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You left out Twitter and Facebook suckered large numbers of Iranian and Guatemalan young people in to posting anti government rants on them , thinking they were going to overthrow their government with Twitter .
Now that 's a laugh .
It was a stellar part of the Twitter hype to make everyone think Twitter would lead to an instantaneous outbreak of Democracy across the globe .
CNN was a leading purveyor of this myth .
Since CNN has pretty much ceased to function as a news network all they have left to do is grasp at straws in the form of Twitter , Facebook and iReport .
They kind of missed the fact its nearly impossible to verify anything you get from the anonymous public , or to have any confidence in the source .
Howard Stern pranks proved this.Note to wan na be young Iranian rebels , Iran monitors all Internet traffic so using Twitter in the clear provides the Basij with an instantaneous mechanism to identify , arrest and track you and your rabble-rouser friends .
Note to all future young wan na be rebels , all your internet activities are probably being watched .
Your Twitter and Facebook pages are n't a good place to organize a revolution unless you really know what you are doing .
Do n't use them unless you are using anonymous WiFi stolen from your neighbor so they get busted instead , or a very good anonymizer like Tor .
Try reading Cory Doctorow 's Little Brother so you will at least be in the correct mind set for interacting with authoritarian governments who use computers to oppress their people , like Iran , Russia... and the U.S. " Little Brother " is a somewhat flawed work but at least it teaches paranoia .
Note to Linux community , someone really needs to put together Paranoid Linux and XNet with Tor , gnupg , WiFi sniffers , security tools , etc .
and make sure computer noobs who want to overthrow their out of control governments have it , and can use it out of the box even if they are noobs.There is a reason the NSA is building two giant new data centers in Utah and San Antonio and expanding the one in Maryland .
They appear to be preparing to spy on a whole lot more communications traffic than they already are .
Anyone who think America 's bout with Big Brother ended when Obama replaced Bush are sadly mistaken .
The Democrats are just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy all our civil liberties as the Cheneyists were.A burning question of the 21st century is if computers will liberate us or enslave us .
The paradoxical answer is they will probably do both at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You left out Twitter and Facebook suckered large numbers of Iranian and Guatemalan young people in to posting anti government rants on them, thinking they were going to overthrow their government with Twitter.
Now that's a laugh.
It was a stellar part of the Twitter hype to make everyone think Twitter would lead to an instantaneous outbreak of Democracy across the globe.
CNN was a leading purveyor of this myth.
Since CNN has pretty much ceased to function as a news network all they have left to do is grasp at straws in the form of Twitter, Facebook and iReport.
They kind of missed the fact its nearly impossible to verify anything you get from the anonymous public, or to have any confidence in the source.
Howard Stern pranks proved this.Note to wanna be young Iranian rebels, Iran monitors all Internet traffic so using Twitter in the clear provides the Basij with an instantaneous mechanism to identify, arrest and track you and your rabble-rouser friends.
Note to all future young wanna be rebels, all your internet activities are probably being watched.
Your Twitter and Facebook pages aren't a good place to organize a revolution unless you really know what you are doing.
Don't use them unless you are using anonymous WiFi stolen from your neighbor so they get busted instead, or a very good anonymizer like Tor.
Try reading Cory Doctorow's Little Brother so you will at least be in the correct mind set for interacting with authoritarian governments who use computers to oppress their people, like Iran, Russia... and the U.S."Little Brother" is a somewhat flawed work but at least it teaches paranoia.
Note to Linux community, someone really needs to put together Paranoid Linux and XNet with Tor, gnupg, WiFi sniffers, security tools, etc.
and make sure computer noobs who want to overthrow their out of control governments have it, and can use it out of the box even if they are noobs.There is a reason the NSA is building two giant new data centers in Utah and San Antonio and expanding the one in Maryland.
They appear to be preparing to spy on a whole lot more communications traffic than they already are.
Anyone who think America's bout with Big Brother ended when Obama replaced Bush are sadly mistaken.
The Democrats are just as eager to spy on everyone and destroy all our civil liberties as the Cheneyists were.A burning question of the 21st century is if computers will liberate us or enslave us.
The paradoxical answer is they will probably do both at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677715</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247504880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers, then it's a lot quicker (and cheaper) to call them. It's only quicker to text if it's a single message with a single response.</p></div><p>Meh... Text messages, like e-mail, allow you to "fire and forget" so that you can be doing something else at the same time.  You can respond at your leisure, unlike a phone conversation which takes complete attention or at least a large part of it.  Consider that it's possible to have 4 or 5 text message conversations at the same time whereas the same would be impossible with the phone.</p><p>Overall I agree with you.  I think people spend way too much time with this stuff but some of your recommendations are wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers , then it 's a lot quicker ( and cheaper ) to call them .
It 's only quicker to text if it 's a single message with a single response.Meh... Text messages , like e-mail , allow you to " fire and forget " so that you can be doing something else at the same time .
You can respond at your leisure , unlike a phone conversation which takes complete attention or at least a large part of it .
Consider that it 's possible to have 4 or 5 text message conversations at the same time whereas the same would be impossible with the phone.Overall I agree with you .
I think people spend way too much time with this stuff but some of your recommendations are wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers, then it's a lot quicker (and cheaper) to call them.
It's only quicker to text if it's a single message with a single response.Meh... Text messages, like e-mail, allow you to "fire and forget" so that you can be doing something else at the same time.
You can respond at your leisure, unlike a phone conversation which takes complete attention or at least a large part of it.
Consider that it's possible to have 4 or 5 text message conversations at the same time whereas the same would be impossible with the phone.Overall I agree with you.
I think people spend way too much time with this stuff but some of your recommendations are wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677931</id>
	<title>Sigh...</title>
	<author>Max Night</author>
	<datestamp>1247505480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are
pointless".

As a steady twitter user - well, duh.  You have to actually CONVERSE with people to form friendships there - it's not about creating a profile for others to view.

But more to the point - I find it fascinating that Morgan Stanley - and the world for that matter, seems to find the observations of a 15-year-old so relevant.  Not that I've got anything against 15-year-olds - I've got a kid of my own.  But between facebook, myspace and twitter, I've got hundreds of friends that I actually know in one way or the other - and less than 10 are teens.  This is the case for most of the people I know.

Why are these observations sparking such a "storm"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" they realise that no one is viewing their profile , so their tweets are pointless " .
As a steady twitter user - well , duh .
You have to actually CONVERSE with people to form friendships there - it 's not about creating a profile for others to view .
But more to the point - I find it fascinating that Morgan Stanley - and the world for that matter , seems to find the observations of a 15-year-old so relevant .
Not that I 've got anything against 15-year-olds - I 've got a kid of my own .
But between facebook , myspace and twitter , I 've got hundreds of friends that I actually know in one way or the other - and less than 10 are teens .
This is the case for most of the people I know .
Why are these observations sparking such a " storm " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are
pointless".
As a steady twitter user - well, duh.
You have to actually CONVERSE with people to form friendships there - it's not about creating a profile for others to view.
But more to the point - I find it fascinating that Morgan Stanley - and the world for that matter, seems to find the observations of a 15-year-old so relevant.
Not that I've got anything against 15-year-olds - I've got a kid of my own.
But between facebook, myspace and twitter, I've got hundreds of friends that I actually know in one way or the other - and less than 10 are teens.
This is the case for most of the people I know.
Why are these observations sparking such a "storm"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28685875</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a teenager, I have this to say: We don't use Twitter because Twitter is for old farts that think they are cool. I know one person in their 20's who uses Twitter. None of my friends, none of my friend's friends, and none of my teenage co-workers use Twitter. Do you wanna know how you can figure out if teenagers use something? Turn on Fox and Friends: if they are using it and/or promoting it, we aren't using it. If they are complaining about its' evils, we are using it.</p><p>Let's expand it even further. <b>Every person I talk to online does not use Twitter.</b> That's youtube buddies, justintv buddies, msn buddies, and video game buddies. The age spectrum for them is 12-40. So what, that's roughly 100 individuals that aren't people I know in real life. That's a fairly sizeable group; and I'm sure that if you pulled aside a few teenagers who use the internet regularly, you'd get similar results. 1/150-ish people (that includes the people from paragraph 1) I communicate with/know use Twitter; the rest don't.</p><p>So there's more than his 5 friends. I for one salute him. It's just a shame that -he- was the one in the position to do the report. I've got more data than him, and I could probably produce a better article.</p><p>As for your last paragraph...that's what all adults do. They choose one person to speak for all; from head of the household surveys all the way up to the leader of the country. We don't have time to gather the opinion of billions of humans on every last piece of statistical bullshit in the world. But keep in mind that before this one teenager got the chance to voice his opinion, you adults were too busy telling the world what us teenagers thought of Twitter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>In conclusion: adults think teenagers are too immature and incapable of writing anything. I, as a teenager, think maybe you should just step back and let us talk. Instead, we get a few extremely lucky teenagers that got dealt one hell of a lucky hand making us look stupid. That wonder kid for the Conservative party, for example, or the kids who tape themselves beating up other kids. We're not all like that; but the ones who aren't like that do enjoy the glaring hypocrisy of being told how our entire demographic is (re-iterating the aforementioned statement that adults really like to tell teenagers what teenagers think).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a teenager , I have this to say : We do n't use Twitter because Twitter is for old farts that think they are cool .
I know one person in their 20 's who uses Twitter .
None of my friends , none of my friend 's friends , and none of my teenage co-workers use Twitter .
Do you wan na know how you can figure out if teenagers use something ?
Turn on Fox and Friends : if they are using it and/or promoting it , we are n't using it .
If they are complaining about its ' evils , we are using it.Let 's expand it even further .
Every person I talk to online does not use Twitter .
That 's youtube buddies , justintv buddies , msn buddies , and video game buddies .
The age spectrum for them is 12-40 .
So what , that 's roughly 100 individuals that are n't people I know in real life .
That 's a fairly sizeable group ; and I 'm sure that if you pulled aside a few teenagers who use the internet regularly , you 'd get similar results .
1/150-ish people ( that includes the people from paragraph 1 ) I communicate with/know use Twitter ; the rest do n't.So there 's more than his 5 friends .
I for one salute him .
It 's just a shame that -he- was the one in the position to do the report .
I 've got more data than him , and I could probably produce a better article.As for your last paragraph...that 's what all adults do .
They choose one person to speak for all ; from head of the household surveys all the way up to the leader of the country .
We do n't have time to gather the opinion of billions of humans on every last piece of statistical bullshit in the world .
But keep in mind that before this one teenager got the chance to voice his opinion , you adults were too busy telling the world what us teenagers thought of Twitter ; ) In conclusion : adults think teenagers are too immature and incapable of writing anything .
I , as a teenager , think maybe you should just step back and let us talk .
Instead , we get a few extremely lucky teenagers that got dealt one hell of a lucky hand making us look stupid .
That wonder kid for the Conservative party , for example , or the kids who tape themselves beating up other kids .
We 're not all like that ; but the ones who are n't like that do enjoy the glaring hypocrisy of being told how our entire demographic is ( re-iterating the aforementioned statement that adults really like to tell teenagers what teenagers think ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a teenager, I have this to say: We don't use Twitter because Twitter is for old farts that think they are cool.
I know one person in their 20's who uses Twitter.
None of my friends, none of my friend's friends, and none of my teenage co-workers use Twitter.
Do you wanna know how you can figure out if teenagers use something?
Turn on Fox and Friends: if they are using it and/or promoting it, we aren't using it.
If they are complaining about its' evils, we are using it.Let's expand it even further.
Every person I talk to online does not use Twitter.
That's youtube buddies, justintv buddies, msn buddies, and video game buddies.
The age spectrum for them is 12-40.
So what, that's roughly 100 individuals that aren't people I know in real life.
That's a fairly sizeable group; and I'm sure that if you pulled aside a few teenagers who use the internet regularly, you'd get similar results.
1/150-ish people (that includes the people from paragraph 1) I communicate with/know use Twitter; the rest don't.So there's more than his 5 friends.
I for one salute him.
It's just a shame that -he- was the one in the position to do the report.
I've got more data than him, and I could probably produce a better article.As for your last paragraph...that's what all adults do.
They choose one person to speak for all; from head of the household surveys all the way up to the leader of the country.
We don't have time to gather the opinion of billions of humans on every last piece of statistical bullshit in the world.
But keep in mind that before this one teenager got the chance to voice his opinion, you adults were too busy telling the world what us teenagers thought of Twitter ;)In conclusion: adults think teenagers are too immature and incapable of writing anything.
I, as a teenager, think maybe you should just step back and let us talk.
Instead, we get a few extremely lucky teenagers that got dealt one hell of a lucky hand making us look stupid.
That wonder kid for the Conservative party, for example, or the kids who tape themselves beating up other kids.
We're not all like that; but the ones who aren't like that do enjoy the glaring hypocrisy of being told how our entire demographic is (re-iterating the aforementioned statement that adults really like to tell teenagers what teenagers think).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677451</id>
	<title>WFC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247503920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>= Who the Fuck Cares - twittering twatterers are almost entirely useless. They are more wound up in their non-importance than bloggers and that is saying something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>= Who the Fuck Cares - twittering twatterers are almost entirely useless .
They are more wound up in their non-importance than bloggers and that is saying something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>= Who the Fuck Cares - twittering twatterers are almost entirely useless.
They are more wound up in their non-importance than bloggers and that is saying something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675725</id>
	<title>Uncle Morgan or Aunt Stanley?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247497680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does one get to be an intern at an organization at M-S at age 15?</p><p>ps--kid's right, twitter is dumb</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does one get to be an intern at an organization at M-S at age 15 ? ps--kid 's right , twitter is dumb</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does one get to be an intern at an organization at M-S at age 15?ps--kid's right, twitter is dumb</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679031</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247509020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA (your link):</p><p> <i>Apparently, there were some DEP workers on the scene who were "looking" for cones to mark the area when the girl fell in.</i> </p><p>And from your post</p><p> <i>I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award. Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.</i> </p><p>Not that a capital case should be made of this, I think the "DEP workers" should have looked for their cones prior to grabbing their crowbar.  Although they may have had an emergency of greater proportions with which to contend (locate a leak, look for some other girl who fell into the sewers...).  Also, I spend enough time walking in total darkness (me casa) to both be comfortable not seeing and - on rare occasion - to be surprised with what is or is not present.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA ( your link ) : Apparently , there were some DEP workers on the scene who were " looking " for cones to mark the area when the girl fell in .
And from your post I 'll get yelled at for saying this but it 's a pity she did n't earn herself a Darwin award .
Now she 's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation .
Not that a capital case should be made of this , I think the " DEP workers " should have looked for their cones prior to grabbing their crowbar .
Although they may have had an emergency of greater proportions with which to contend ( locate a leak , look for some other girl who fell into the sewers... ) .
Also , I spend enough time walking in total darkness ( me casa ) to both be comfortable not seeing and - on rare occasion - to be surprised with what is or is not present .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA (your link): Apparently, there were some DEP workers on the scene who were "looking" for cones to mark the area when the girl fell in.
And from your post I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award.
Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.
Not that a capital case should be made of this, I think the "DEP workers" should have looked for their cones prior to grabbing their crowbar.
Although they may have had an emergency of greater proportions with which to contend (locate a leak, look for some other girl who fell into the sewers...).
Also, I spend enough time walking in total darkness (me casa) to both be comfortable not seeing and - on rare occasion - to be surprised with what is or is not present.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675803</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1247497980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh, when I was 15 I wasn't thinking about 15 year old girls... it was the 18 year old cheerleaders, 22 yearl old bikini models and 28 year actresses that always got my attention. I didn't think about 15 year old girls until I was 17 and realized that the only girls I had a chance with were 15/16<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-p since all the girls my own age were dating some college kid or at least thought they should be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , when I was 15 I was n't thinking about 15 year old girls... it was the 18 year old cheerleaders , 22 yearl old bikini models and 28 year actresses that always got my attention .
I did n't think about 15 year old girls until I was 17 and realized that the only girls I had a chance with were 15/16 ; -p since all the girls my own age were dating some college kid or at least thought they should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh, when I was 15 I wasn't thinking about 15 year old girls... it was the 18 year old cheerleaders, 22 yearl old bikini models and 28 year actresses that always got my attention.
I didn't think about 15 year old girls until I was 17 and realized that the only girls I had a chance with were 15/16 ;-p since all the girls my own age were dating some college kid or at least thought they should be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678287</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>AK Marc</author>
	<datestamp>1247506560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report, he or she would be viewed as "old" or "not with it" and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing. Oh, but wait, we have a 15 year old telling us this? Shit, that's the demographic this is supposed to work on! Oh man, now we better listen. And suddenly, overnight, it's okay to doubt Twitter's power out loud. Amazing.</i> <br> <br>There is a massive and explicit difference between the reports.  Others said "Twitter is stupid."  This kid said "Twitter isn't bad, but the uses of it are driving away long-term users and leaving those that follow personalities."  Twitter itself is a good idea.  It's a convenient place for a mass-IM to subscribers.  If people only sent tweets on important things, it would be permanent.  However, when people get bathroom updates, it's all crap.  I'm not on.  I don't want to be that connected.  But if I were on, I'd have sent out something like one per month or less (and they'd be big things, like one narcisist one about my vacation to California, one about my wife being pregnant, and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency, with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country, once known).  But with multiple per day, I don't care when someone's going to the mall so I can run into them there.  I may be old, but if I wanted to run into someone, I'd text them, not announce it to masses.<br> <br>And that's why twitter will fail.  To promote themselves, they promoted the "tweet everything" attitude, and people do.  And that drives off those that want medium connectivity, not webcam-in-the-bathroom connectivity.  And that's the idea behind why this kid said it is going to fail.  Not any problem with the technology or the general idea, but the current usage and its lack of sustainability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report , he or she would be viewed as " old " or " not with it " and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing .
Oh , but wait , we have a 15 year old telling us this ?
Shit , that 's the demographic this is supposed to work on !
Oh man , now we better listen .
And suddenly , overnight , it 's okay to doubt Twitter 's power out loud .
Amazing. There is a massive and explicit difference between the reports .
Others said " Twitter is stupid .
" This kid said " Twitter is n't bad , but the uses of it are driving away long-term users and leaving those that follow personalities .
" Twitter itself is a good idea .
It 's a convenient place for a mass-IM to subscribers .
If people only sent tweets on important things , it would be permanent .
However , when people get bathroom updates , it 's all crap .
I 'm not on .
I do n't want to be that connected .
But if I were on , I 'd have sent out something like one per month or less ( and they 'd be big things , like one narcisist one about my vacation to California , one about my wife being pregnant , and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency , with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country , once known ) .
But with multiple per day , I do n't care when someone 's going to the mall so I can run into them there .
I may be old , but if I wanted to run into someone , I 'd text them , not announce it to masses .
And that 's why twitter will fail .
To promote themselves , they promoted the " tweet everything " attitude , and people do .
And that drives off those that want medium connectivity , not webcam-in-the-bathroom connectivity .
And that 's the idea behind why this kid said it is going to fail .
Not any problem with the technology or the general idea , but the current usage and its lack of sustainability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone above the age of 20 wrote this report, he or she would be viewed as "old" or "not with it" and the report would be dismissed as sour grapes or get off my lawn or some such thing.
Oh, but wait, we have a 15 year old telling us this?
Shit, that's the demographic this is supposed to work on!
Oh man, now we better listen.
And suddenly, overnight, it's okay to doubt Twitter's power out loud.
Amazing.  There is a massive and explicit difference between the reports.
Others said "Twitter is stupid.
"  This kid said "Twitter isn't bad, but the uses of it are driving away long-term users and leaving those that follow personalities.
"  Twitter itself is a good idea.
It's a convenient place for a mass-IM to subscribers.
If people only sent tweets on important things, it would be permanent.
However, when people get bathroom updates, it's all crap.
I'm not on.
I don't want to be that connected.
But if I were on, I'd have sent out something like one per month or less (and they'd be big things, like one narcisist one about my vacation to California, one about my wife being pregnant, and one about getting New Zealand permanent residency, with the next one being the date that we are leaving the country, once known).
But with multiple per day, I don't care when someone's going to the mall so I can run into them there.
I may be old, but if I wanted to run into someone, I'd text them, not announce it to masses.
And that's why twitter will fail.
To promote themselves, they promoted the "tweet everything" attitude, and people do.
And that drives off those that want medium connectivity, not webcam-in-the-bathroom connectivity.
And that's the idea behind why this kid said it is going to fail.
Not any problem with the technology or the general idea, but the current usage and its lack of sustainability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675367</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>greenreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1247495940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The point being that 10-year-olds will be "the rest of us" soon enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point being that 10-year-olds will be " the rest of us " soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point being that 10-year-olds will be "the rest of us" soon enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676207</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He wasn't hanging out with media analysts, he was on work experience. Kids in Year 10 (14 - 15 years old) spend a week in a company of (mostly) their choosing to see what the world of work is like, and to see if they really want to be a scientist / astronaught / fireman / gaenocologist.<br> <br>Consider that this story wasn't published for its insight, but to drum up media coverage for Morgan Stanley. It seems to have worked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was n't hanging out with media analysts , he was on work experience .
Kids in Year 10 ( 14 - 15 years old ) spend a week in a company of ( mostly ) their choosing to see what the world of work is like , and to see if they really want to be a scientist / astronaught / fireman / gaenocologist .
Consider that this story was n't published for its insight , but to drum up media coverage for Morgan Stanley .
It seems to have worked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wasn't hanging out with media analysts, he was on work experience.
Kids in Year 10 (14 - 15 years old) spend a week in a company of (mostly) their choosing to see what the world of work is like, and to see if they really want to be a scientist / astronaught / fireman / gaenocologist.
Consider that this story wasn't published for its insight, but to drum up media coverage for Morgan Stanley.
It seems to have worked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676585</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1247500980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we've solved the financial crisis in America.  What the hell are Morgan Stanley paying their regular analysts for if they can solicit a better paper for free from a 15-year old?  And if stating the obvious is a breakthrough for Morgan Stanley, is there any value whatsoever to what they usually publish?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we 've solved the financial crisis in America .
What the hell are Morgan Stanley paying their regular analysts for if they can solicit a better paper for free from a 15-year old ?
And if stating the obvious is a breakthrough for Morgan Stanley , is there any value whatsoever to what they usually publish ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we've solved the financial crisis in America.
What the hell are Morgan Stanley paying their regular analysts for if they can solicit a better paper for free from a 15-year old?
And if stating the obvious is a breakthrough for Morgan Stanley, is there any value whatsoever to what they usually publish?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676943</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>GuerillaRadio</author>
	<datestamp>1247502120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can't believe an editor let that report pass</p></div><p>
You must be new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe an editor let that report pass You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe an editor let that report pass
You must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677237</id>
	<title>Iran</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247503140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How quickly we forget.</p><p>#iranelection<br>#neda<br>#Iran</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How quickly we forget. # iranelection # neda # Iran</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How quickly we forget.#iranelection#neda#Iran</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675823</id>
	<title>Punditocracy</title>
	<author>iluvcapra</author>
	<datestamp>1247498100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this is how Cringely got started.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this is how Cringely got started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this is how Cringely got started.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683461</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1247483160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps this kid sees consoles evolving into phone size device, like every other person who thinks the iPhone is the next video game arena to jump into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps this kid sees consoles evolving into phone size device , like every other person who thinks the iPhone is the next video game arena to jump into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps this kid sees consoles evolving into phone size device, like every other person who thinks the iPhone is the next video game arena to jump into.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676447</id>
	<title>Re:One person's anecdotes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol I use X Windows for viewing multimedia and viewing web sites. The rest of the time I'm in a shell. I can never find anything in Gnome or KDE. It's faster to type the command I want than it is to play hunt and seek in a bazillion levels of poorly organized submenus with a mouse. On top of that the interfaces for the programs I want are usually named differently than the actual programs themselves which adds to the confusion. They can keep it...</p><p>That's probably why when asked which I prefer, KDE or Gnome, my usual response is "there's a difference?". I could care less.</p><p>Usually GUIs get in the way. I don't bother installing them on servers at all. It's a waste of drive space. That being said compiz-fusion is fun lol, but it's primary purpose for me is tech bling. As long as the windowing system allows me to put a shortcut to a shell on the desktop I'm good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol I use X Windows for viewing multimedia and viewing web sites .
The rest of the time I 'm in a shell .
I can never find anything in Gnome or KDE .
It 's faster to type the command I want than it is to play hunt and seek in a bazillion levels of poorly organized submenus with a mouse .
On top of that the interfaces for the programs I want are usually named differently than the actual programs themselves which adds to the confusion .
They can keep it...That 's probably why when asked which I prefer , KDE or Gnome , my usual response is " there 's a difference ? " .
I could care less.Usually GUIs get in the way .
I do n't bother installing them on servers at all .
It 's a waste of drive space .
That being said compiz-fusion is fun lol , but it 's primary purpose for me is tech bling .
As long as the windowing system allows me to put a shortcut to a shell on the desktop I 'm good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol I use X Windows for viewing multimedia and viewing web sites.
The rest of the time I'm in a shell.
I can never find anything in Gnome or KDE.
It's faster to type the command I want than it is to play hunt and seek in a bazillion levels of poorly organized submenus with a mouse.
On top of that the interfaces for the programs I want are usually named differently than the actual programs themselves which adds to the confusion.
They can keep it...That's probably why when asked which I prefer, KDE or Gnome, my usual response is "there's a difference?".
I could care less.Usually GUIs get in the way.
I don't bother installing them on servers at all.
It's a waste of drive space.
That being said compiz-fusion is fun lol, but it's primary purpose for me is tech bling.
As long as the windowing system allows me to put a shortcut to a shell on the desktop I'm good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682449</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247478900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If a <b>15-year-old "anal</b>yst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You should be embarrassed.  I'm not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 15-year-old " analyst " writes one of the most " clearest and most thought-provoking insights " for your publication , that says a lot more about your publication ( and the state of American journalism ) than the 15-year-old in question .
You should be embarrassed .
I 'm not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 15-year-old "analyst" writes one of the most "clearest and most thought-provoking insights" for your publication, that says a lot more about your publication (and the state of American journalism) than the 15-year-old in question.
You should be embarrassed.
I'm not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676515</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>gailrob</author>
	<datestamp>1247500800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America")"</p><p>Probably because he's not an American?</p><p>He over generalizes throughout the entire report and failed to backup any point with real study statistics. This entire report is basically one kid's opinion of how his friends prioritize their extremely limited expenses. Why on earth this generated so much attention is beyond me.</p><p>The worst part? He's now in a position to leverage this momentary popularity to continue spouting his BS as fact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Why do n't we ask him to write about homework ( " a near-epidemic in America " ) " Probably because he 's not an American ? He over generalizes throughout the entire report and failed to backup any point with real study statistics .
This entire report is basically one kid 's opinion of how his friends prioritize their extremely limited expenses .
Why on earth this generated so much attention is beyond me.The worst part ?
He 's now in a position to leverage this momentary popularity to continue spouting his BS as fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Why don't we ask him to write about homework ("a near-epidemic in America")"Probably because he's not an American?He over generalizes throughout the entire report and failed to backup any point with real study statistics.
This entire report is basically one kid's opinion of how his friends prioritize their extremely limited expenses.
Why on earth this generated so much attention is beyond me.The worst part?
He's now in a position to leverage this momentary popularity to continue spouting his BS as fact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677079</id>
	<title>Irrelevant Perspective - Thx</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247502540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sigh - more analyst wranglers who don't understand that all things technical and social don't automatically sit in the domain of the 15yr old male.   I see very few 15year olds on Twitter - I doubt that most can form a coherent thought in 140 characters.    The typical 15yr old sends thousands of SMS's a month containing very little content.  On Twitter I see adults of all ages engaging in some pretty entertaining, succinct and pithy thoughts.</p><p>Seriously I'd just as soon get insights on fine wine selections from a 15 yr old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sigh - more analyst wranglers who do n't understand that all things technical and social do n't automatically sit in the domain of the 15yr old male .
I see very few 15year olds on Twitter - I doubt that most can form a coherent thought in 140 characters .
The typical 15yr old sends thousands of SMS 's a month containing very little content .
On Twitter I see adults of all ages engaging in some pretty entertaining , succinct and pithy thoughts.Seriously I 'd just as soon get insights on fine wine selections from a 15 yr old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sigh - more analyst wranglers who don't understand that all things technical and social don't automatically sit in the domain of the 15yr old male.
I see very few 15year olds on Twitter - I doubt that most can form a coherent thought in 140 characters.
The typical 15yr old sends thousands of SMS's a month containing very little content.
On Twitter I see adults of all ages engaging in some pretty entertaining, succinct and pithy thoughts.Seriously I'd just as soon get insights on fine wine selections from a 15 yr old.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676511</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you take a seat, right over there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you take a seat , right over there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you take a seat, right over there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</id>
	<title>I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are bad</title>
	<author>Zen</author>
	<datestamp>1247496600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just had this discussion with my wife over the weekend, but in our case we were talking mainly about Facebook and not Twitter, but the same principal applies.  My take is that I like the concept of being able to keep in touch with friends and family easily, but the implementation of facebook, myspace, twitter, and sms messaging leaves a lot to be desired.  Facebook and myspace allow other people to post things which you may or may not want posted about you, and it keeps those postings for a certain amount of time (# of posts).  Yes, you can delete them, but that's not the point.  If there was damage, it's already done.  Twitter is completely abused by people posting things about going to the store or going to a movie.  Who really cares about that except stalkers or people who need to live vicariously through other more exciting people?  I see the point for texting/sms, but I can't stand hearing about people that constantly text their friends.  If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers, then it's a lot quicker (and cheaper) to call them.  It's only quicker to text if it's a single message with a single response.  Yes, I'm very technologically literate - I have worked in the computer networking hardware industry for ten years.  But the implementation and addictiveness to many people of these four services is really bad.  I know a few people who use these services solely for posting pictures and stories for family and good friends - I definitely get that.</p><p>For the flip side - my wife uses facebook quite a bit and likes getting updates from people she probably wouldn't call and talk to.  Also enjoys looking at pictures when someone posts them.  I get that - I just don't get the constant attention it requires.  I look at her page, and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis, and we're not talking high school or college kids here.  And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - "can't wait to go drinking", "feeling lonely", "two days until the weekend", "my life is like xxx song lyric", etc.  She agreed with me about that stuff, but it seems like most of our joint friends enjoy posting comments like that.  As for twitter, she equated it to instant messaging.  Definitely not the same thing because it's kept forever and isn't a two way conversation.</p><p>I'm not starting flames.  I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.  There have to be other people out there that agree with me, or that can come up with rational reasons as to why I'm wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just had this discussion with my wife over the weekend , but in our case we were talking mainly about Facebook and not Twitter , but the same principal applies .
My take is that I like the concept of being able to keep in touch with friends and family easily , but the implementation of facebook , myspace , twitter , and sms messaging leaves a lot to be desired .
Facebook and myspace allow other people to post things which you may or may not want posted about you , and it keeps those postings for a certain amount of time ( # of posts ) .
Yes , you can delete them , but that 's not the point .
If there was damage , it 's already done .
Twitter is completely abused by people posting things about going to the store or going to a movie .
Who really cares about that except stalkers or people who need to live vicariously through other more exciting people ?
I see the point for texting/sms , but I ca n't stand hearing about people that constantly text their friends .
If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers , then it 's a lot quicker ( and cheaper ) to call them .
It 's only quicker to text if it 's a single message with a single response .
Yes , I 'm very technologically literate - I have worked in the computer networking hardware industry for ten years .
But the implementation and addictiveness to many people of these four services is really bad .
I know a few people who use these services solely for posting pictures and stories for family and good friends - I definitely get that.For the flip side - my wife uses facebook quite a bit and likes getting updates from people she probably would n't call and talk to .
Also enjoys looking at pictures when someone posts them .
I get that - I just do n't get the constant attention it requires .
I look at her page , and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis , and we 're not talking high school or college kids here .
And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - " ca n't wait to go drinking " , " feeling lonely " , " two days until the weekend " , " my life is like xxx song lyric " , etc .
She agreed with me about that stuff , but it seems like most of our joint friends enjoy posting comments like that .
As for twitter , she equated it to instant messaging .
Definitely not the same thing because it 's kept forever and is n't a two way conversation.I 'm not starting flames .
I just do n't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless .
There have to be other people out there that agree with me , or that can come up with rational reasons as to why I 'm wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just had this discussion with my wife over the weekend, but in our case we were talking mainly about Facebook and not Twitter, but the same principal applies.
My take is that I like the concept of being able to keep in touch with friends and family easily, but the implementation of facebook, myspace, twitter, and sms messaging leaves a lot to be desired.
Facebook and myspace allow other people to post things which you may or may not want posted about you, and it keeps those postings for a certain amount of time (# of posts).
Yes, you can delete them, but that's not the point.
If there was damage, it's already done.
Twitter is completely abused by people posting things about going to the store or going to a movie.
Who really cares about that except stalkers or people who need to live vicariously through other more exciting people?
I see the point for texting/sms, but I can't stand hearing about people that constantly text their friends.
If you need to have a conversation with someone with multiple questions and answers, then it's a lot quicker (and cheaper) to call them.
It's only quicker to text if it's a single message with a single response.
Yes, I'm very technologically literate - I have worked in the computer networking hardware industry for ten years.
But the implementation and addictiveness to many people of these four services is really bad.
I know a few people who use these services solely for posting pictures and stories for family and good friends - I definitely get that.For the flip side - my wife uses facebook quite a bit and likes getting updates from people she probably wouldn't call and talk to.
Also enjoys looking at pictures when someone posts them.
I get that - I just don't get the constant attention it requires.
I look at her page, and see 3-4 updates from some of her friends on a daily basis, and we're not talking high school or college kids here.
And half of them are lame attempts at introspective comments like - "can't wait to go drinking", "feeling lonely", "two days until the weekend", "my life is like xxx song lyric", etc.
She agreed with me about that stuff, but it seems like most of our joint friends enjoy posting comments like that.
As for twitter, she equated it to instant messaging.
Definitely not the same thing because it's kept forever and isn't a two way conversation.I'm not starting flames.
I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.
There have to be other people out there that agree with me, or that can come up with rational reasons as to why I'm wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679931</id>
	<title>Re:I partially agree - twitter, facebook, etc are</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1247511900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.<br> <br>

Quick bit of pop psych, just from reading your post: you're basically an introvert.  If you don't have anything to say, you don't say anything, because for you silence beats mindless conversation.  She and her friends are extroverts.  If they don't have anything to say, they say something to try and get a conversationg going, because for them, any conversation is more interesting than silence.<br> <br>

People who would rather think than talk stare at twitter and facebook and think they're pretty much incomprehensible, but that's because they have different premises for their social interaction patterns.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I just do n't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless .
Quick bit of pop psych , just from reading your post : you 're basically an introvert .
If you do n't have anything to say , you do n't say anything , because for you silence beats mindless conversation .
She and her friends are extroverts .
If they do n't have anything to say , they say something to try and get a conversationg going , because for them , any conversation is more interesting than silence .
People who would rather think than talk stare at twitter and facebook and think they 're pretty much incomprehensible , but that 's because they have different premises for their social interaction patterns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I just don't understand why so many people are so addicted to these computer based types of social networks when to an outsiders perspective many of the posts seem either phony or useless.
Quick bit of pop psych, just from reading your post: you're basically an introvert.
If you don't have anything to say, you don't say anything, because for you silence beats mindless conversation.
She and her friends are extroverts.
If they don't have anything to say, they say something to try and get a conversationg going, because for them, any conversation is more interesting than silence.
People who would rather think than talk stare at twitter and facebook and think they're pretty much incomprehensible, but that's because they have different premises for their social interaction patterns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677709</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1247504880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real problem here is people making business decisions based on reading a fucking report instead of hiring someone who actually knows what's going on. A report written by people who do not, themselves, know what is going on.</p><p>
Twitter is not used for what people imagine it is used for. Period. No one has the time or inclination to actually send status updates constantly, and frankly that was a little idiotic to start with. It's sometimes used as a sort of broadband instant messages for you you need to do that, like if you're at a concert with a dozen friends and everyone's wandering around, but it's not that useful.</p><p>
It's real funny to watch 'serious' people jump on the bandwagon that never actually existed, that normal human being got bored with after four days and just hooked up to their facebook status and now update both twice a day.</p><p>
It's exceptionally funny that <b>anyone</b> ever bought Twitter's premise. People do not want to narrate their life in real time, unless they are somewhere very boring and have nothing else to do, at which point they will MST3k their life. They don't even want to narrate it retroactively unless they did something very interesting like go on vacation. Anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence could have told investors this.</p><p>
And I don't know in what world this kid lives in, but I'm around teenagers a lot, and let me tell you, they use SMS <b>all the time</b>. I volunteer at a local theatre. We're doing Music Man. A dozen teenagers, all with cell phones. At intermission, half of them rush to get their phones and return messages.(1)</p><p>
And no one chats over 'console games'. First of all, it requires everyone to be at their game console at the same time. (I'm assuming that there's some sort of global chat for newer systems that operates independent of games, and in all games...if not this is even stupider, as they'd have to be in the same game.)</p><p>
And a lot of houses have their game consoles in, you know, the living room, which means they'd be chatting in <b>public</b>. In front of their parents. So yeah...</p><p>
Seriously, this is why you don't rely on one person's experience. That might be how he and his friends chat, but it probably totally irrelevant to society at large.</p><p>
Which, of course, makes it perfect for a Morgan Stanley report.</p><p>
1) However, the crazy 'people IMing people who are room with each other' report that we got a few months ago is <b>also</b> bogus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real problem here is people making business decisions based on reading a fucking report instead of hiring someone who actually knows what 's going on .
A report written by people who do not , themselves , know what is going on .
Twitter is not used for what people imagine it is used for .
Period. No one has the time or inclination to actually send status updates constantly , and frankly that was a little idiotic to start with .
It 's sometimes used as a sort of broadband instant messages for you you need to do that , like if you 're at a concert with a dozen friends and everyone 's wandering around , but it 's not that useful .
It 's real funny to watch 'serious ' people jump on the bandwagon that never actually existed , that normal human being got bored with after four days and just hooked up to their facebook status and now update both twice a day .
It 's exceptionally funny that anyone ever bought Twitter 's premise .
People do not want to narrate their life in real time , unless they are somewhere very boring and have nothing else to do , at which point they will MST3k their life .
They do n't even want to narrate it retroactively unless they did something very interesting like go on vacation .
Anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence could have told investors this .
And I do n't know in what world this kid lives in , but I 'm around teenagers a lot , and let me tell you , they use SMS all the time .
I volunteer at a local theatre .
We 're doing Music Man .
A dozen teenagers , all with cell phones .
At intermission , half of them rush to get their phones and return messages .
( 1 ) And no one chats over 'console games' .
First of all , it requires everyone to be at their game console at the same time .
( I 'm assuming that there 's some sort of global chat for newer systems that operates independent of games , and in all games...if not this is even stupider , as they 'd have to be in the same game .
) And a lot of houses have their game consoles in , you know , the living room , which means they 'd be chatting in public .
In front of their parents .
So yeah.. . Seriously , this is why you do n't rely on one person 's experience .
That might be how he and his friends chat , but it probably totally irrelevant to society at large .
Which , of course , makes it perfect for a Morgan Stanley report .
1 ) However , the crazy 'people IMing people who are room with each other ' report that we got a few months ago is also bogus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real problem here is people making business decisions based on reading a fucking report instead of hiring someone who actually knows what's going on.
A report written by people who do not, themselves, know what is going on.
Twitter is not used for what people imagine it is used for.
Period. No one has the time or inclination to actually send status updates constantly, and frankly that was a little idiotic to start with.
It's sometimes used as a sort of broadband instant messages for you you need to do that, like if you're at a concert with a dozen friends and everyone's wandering around, but it's not that useful.
It's real funny to watch 'serious' people jump on the bandwagon that never actually existed, that normal human being got bored with after four days and just hooked up to their facebook status and now update both twice a day.
It's exceptionally funny that anyone ever bought Twitter's premise.
People do not want to narrate their life in real time, unless they are somewhere very boring and have nothing else to do, at which point they will MST3k their life.
They don't even want to narrate it retroactively unless they did something very interesting like go on vacation.
Anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence could have told investors this.
And I don't know in what world this kid lives in, but I'm around teenagers a lot, and let me tell you, they use SMS all the time.
I volunteer at a local theatre.
We're doing Music Man.
A dozen teenagers, all with cell phones.
At intermission, half of them rush to get their phones and return messages.
(1)
And no one chats over 'console games'.
First of all, it requires everyone to be at their game console at the same time.
(I'm assuming that there's some sort of global chat for newer systems that operates independent of games, and in all games...if not this is even stupider, as they'd have to be in the same game.
)
And a lot of houses have their game consoles in, you know, the living room, which means they'd be chatting in public.
In front of their parents.
So yeah...
Seriously, this is why you don't rely on one person's experience.
That might be how he and his friends chat, but it probably totally irrelevant to society at large.
Which, of course, makes it perfect for a Morgan Stanley report.
1) However, the crazy 'people IMing people who are room with each other' report that we got a few months ago is also bogus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677671</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>PainKilleR-CE</author>
	<datestamp>1247504760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people should have known that Twitter's days were numbered when CNN and The View started harping on people to follow them on Twitter. That's generally a sign that it's over, not that it's the next big thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people should have known that Twitter 's days were numbered when CNN and The View started harping on people to follow them on Twitter .
That 's generally a sign that it 's over , not that it 's the next big thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people should have known that Twitter's days were numbered when CNN and The View started harping on people to follow them on Twitter.
That's generally a sign that it's over, not that it's the next big thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675457</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's "fucking embarrassing" is that Aurisor still thought girls were "icky!" when he was 15.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's " fucking embarrassing " is that Aurisor still thought girls were " icky !
" when he was 15 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's "fucking embarrassing" is that Aurisor still thought girls were "icky!
" when he was 15.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675777</id>
	<title>Re:Why is it...</title>
	<author>Late Adopter</author>
	<datestamp>1247497860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter is</p></div><p>And they all get posted on Slashdot and get at least their average share of comments.  So much goes energy goes into "not using Twitter" these days.  Methinks people doth protest too much?
<br> <br>
My friends and I have a use case for Twitter and we're happy with it.  Not everyone does.  Perhaps they should just realize it's a tool like any other communication medium and let it be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter isAnd they all get posted on Slashdot and get at least their average share of comments .
So much goes energy goes into " not using Twitter " these days .
Methinks people doth protest too much ?
My friends and I have a use case for Twitter and we 're happy with it .
Not everyone does .
Perhaps they should just realize it 's a tool like any other communication medium and let it be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...there have been numerous articles written on the lameness of waste of bandwidth that twitter isAnd they all get posted on Slashdot and get at least their average share of comments.
So much goes energy goes into "not using Twitter" these days.
Methinks people doth protest too much?
My friends and I have a use case for Twitter and we're happy with it.
Not everyone does.
Perhaps they should just realize it's a tool like any other communication medium and let it be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky' would enter a boy's mind at this age when asked about girls.</p><p>Dude, fifteen year old girls have BREASTS, remember that.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>But I concur, if such an article has much more audience than your usual content you should really start thinking about changing your usual content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky ' would enter a boy 's mind at this age when asked about girls.Dude , fifteen year old girls have BREASTS , remember that .
; ) But I concur , if such an article has much more audience than your usual content you should really start thinking about changing your usual content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your being fifteen must have been a looooooooooong time ago if you truly think 'icky' would enter a boy's mind at this age when asked about girls.Dude, fifteen year old girls have BREASTS, remember that.
;)But I concur, if such an article has much more audience than your usual content you should really start thinking about changing your usual content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381</id>
	<title>One person's anecdotes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a facet of human nature that people tend to assume that others think and behave broadly the same way they do. Like the techs in the recent Gnome 3.0 posts arguing that everyone intuitively understands what icons, links, files and folders mean on a computer (tell that to my dad, who just barely knows how to click the "internet" icon and browse simple websites), or political activists who assume that their oppositions <em>must</em> see the world the same way they do, so they're just lying. Heck, there's the whole "internet community" who read a pile of overlapping sites (/., techcrunch, digg, boingboing, etc) and assume that the rest of the internet does too, so that a survey of those sites (legalise cannabis, allow torrents, etc) represents the views and priorities of everyone else. They forget e.g. the big rings of craft websites whose members have probably never heard of 4chan and digg, much less read them, not to mention the many more people who simply don't go on social websites beyond facebook.<br> <br>

It's just the echo chamber effect. A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology, so he assumes it's true for everyone else. So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks, but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a facet of human nature that people tend to assume that others think and behave broadly the same way they do .
Like the techs in the recent Gnome 3.0 posts arguing that everyone intuitively understands what icons , links , files and folders mean on a computer ( tell that to my dad , who just barely knows how to click the " internet " icon and browse simple websites ) , or political activists who assume that their oppositions must see the world the same way they do , so they 're just lying .
Heck , there 's the whole " internet community " who read a pile of overlapping sites ( /. , techcrunch , digg , boingboing , etc ) and assume that the rest of the internet does too , so that a survey of those sites ( legalise cannabis , allow torrents , etc ) represents the views and priorities of everyone else .
They forget e.g .
the big rings of craft websites whose members have probably never heard of 4chan and digg , much less read them , not to mention the many more people who simply do n't go on social websites beyond facebook .
It 's just the echo chamber effect .
A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology , so he assumes it 's true for everyone else .
So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks , but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a facet of human nature that people tend to assume that others think and behave broadly the same way they do.
Like the techs in the recent Gnome 3.0 posts arguing that everyone intuitively understands what icons, links, files and folders mean on a computer (tell that to my dad, who just barely knows how to click the "internet" icon and browse simple websites), or political activists who assume that their oppositions must see the world the same way they do, so they're just lying.
Heck, there's the whole "internet community" who read a pile of overlapping sites (/., techcrunch, digg, boingboing, etc) and assume that the rest of the internet does too, so that a survey of those sites (legalise cannabis, allow torrents, etc) represents the views and priorities of everyone else.
They forget e.g.
the big rings of craft websites whose members have probably never heard of 4chan and digg, much less read them, not to mention the many more people who simply don't go on social websites beyond facebook.
It's just the echo chamber effect.
A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology, so he assumes it's true for everyone else.
So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks, but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675257</id>
	<title>where is the report?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the report linked from TFA. I dont see it on the linked pcpro article either. what exactly is news here? that a 15 yr old wrote something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the report linked from TFA .
I dont see it on the linked pcpro article either .
what exactly is news here ?
that a 15 yr old wrote something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the report linked from TFA.
I dont see it on the linked pcpro article either.
what exactly is news here?
that a 15 yr old wrote something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678991</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247508960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> There<b>'s</b> punctuation errors</p></div><p>
Hi Pot, pleased to meet you. I'm Kettle.
<br> <br>
I can haz grammatical errors too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's punctuation errors Hi Pot , pleased to meet you .
I 'm Kettle .
I can haz grammatical errors too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> There's punctuation errors
Hi Pot, pleased to meet you.
I'm Kettle.
I can haz grammatical errors too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676007</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>robthebloke</author>
	<datestamp>1247498880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>phone credit is like gold-dust to 15 year olds.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>phone credit is like gold-dust to 15 year olds.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>phone credit is like gold-dust to 15 year olds.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675691</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the Report?</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1247497560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The report can be found here<br><a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf" title="ft.com">http://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf</a> [ft.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The report can be found herehttp : //media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf [ ft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The report can be found herehttp://media.ft.com/cms/c3852b2e-6f9a-11de-bfc5-00144feabdc0.pdf [ft.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683945</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>mattytee</author>
	<datestamp>1247486100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... subject-verb agreement problems.</p></div><p>Heh heh. It amuses me greatly when someone falls prey to the very error he or she is attacking.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's ... subject-verb agreement problems.Heh heh .
It amuses me greatly when someone falls prey to the very error he or she is attacking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's ... subject-verb agreement problems.Heh heh.
It amuses me greatly when someone falls prey to the very error he or she is attacking.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675931</id>
	<title>In other words, the younger generation believes</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1247498580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1 nude MMS of the 15 year-old chick who sits next to you in class is more than worth 140 characters of anal-retentive self-promoting status alerts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 nude MMS of the 15 year-old chick who sits next to you in class is more than worth 140 characters of anal-retentive self-promoting status alerts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 nude MMS of the 15 year-old chick who sits next to you in class is more than worth 140 characters of anal-retentive self-promoting status alerts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678423</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1247507100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and statistical rigour has proven so terribly accurate and useful over the past years, particularly when coming from a source like Morgan Stanley.</p><p>Sometimes, an astute observation is just that: an astute observation. There is a reason why progress and innovation do not occur within the tombs of analysts. There's no creativity or thought to their work, just numbers. They work within the system and have a very difficult time seeing outside said system to see the larger picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and statistical rigour has proven so terribly accurate and useful over the past years , particularly when coming from a source like Morgan Stanley.Sometimes , an astute observation is just that : an astute observation .
There is a reason why progress and innovation do not occur within the tombs of analysts .
There 's no creativity or thought to their work , just numbers .
They work within the system and have a very difficult time seeing outside said system to see the larger picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and statistical rigour has proven so terribly accurate and useful over the past years, particularly when coming from a source like Morgan Stanley.Sometimes, an astute observation is just that: an astute observation.
There is a reason why progress and innovation do not occur within the tombs of analysts.
There's no creativity or thought to their work, just numbers.
They work within the system and have a very difficult time seeing outside said system to see the larger picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1247496960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Texting is hard! <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting</a> [gizmodo.com] [gizmodo.com]</p></div><p>I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish.  Wanna lay odds that when she gets her drivers license in a few years she'll be one of the asshats that flies down the road, cell phone in one hand, make-up in the other, paying absolutely no attention to the road?  Then when she gets into an accident she'll say "I never saw it coming!".
</p><p>I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award.  Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Texting is hard !
http : //gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting [ gizmodo.com ] [ gizmodo.com ] I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish .
Wan na lay odds that when she gets her drivers license in a few years she 'll be one of the asshats that flies down the road , cell phone in one hand , make-up in the other , paying absolutely no attention to the road ?
Then when she gets into an accident she 'll say " I never saw it coming ! " .
I 'll get yelled at for saying this but it 's a pity she did n't earn herself a Darwin award .
Now she 's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Texting is hard!
http://gizmodo.com/5312623/teenager-falls-into-open-manhole-while-texting [gizmodo.com] [gizmodo.com]I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish.
Wanna lay odds that when she gets her drivers license in a few years she'll be one of the asshats that flies down the road, cell phone in one hand, make-up in the other, paying absolutely no attention to the road?
Then when she gets into an accident she'll say "I never saw it coming!".
I'll get yelled at for saying this but it's a pity she didn't earn herself a Darwin award.
Now she's going to breed and pass on her stupidity to the next generation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681379</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>jaafonso</author>
	<datestamp>1247517780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>There are</b> punctuation errors. You should learn grammar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are punctuation errors .
You should learn grammar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are punctuation errors.
You should learn grammar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, the Grammar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247497980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This report is an unreadable mess</i></p><p>If you can only communicate and understand things when presented to you in a very specific structured way, you are the minority.  Being thrown off because someone mixed 1 with one means you are either not very flexible, have a reading comprehension problem, just like to bitch, or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down.   Bottom line is the teen gave his opinion on some topic, you don;t understand or care about the topic, you only care that it is not grammatically correct.  Let me guess, if you meet an auto mechanic wearing a suit and tie, you would automatically trust him more than a second mechanic with a dirty pair of coveralls on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This report is an unreadable messIf you can only communicate and understand things when presented to you in a very specific structured way , you are the minority .
Being thrown off because someone mixed 1 with one means you are either not very flexible , have a reading comprehension problem , just like to bitch , or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down .
Bottom line is the teen gave his opinion on some topic , you don ; t understand or care about the topic , you only care that it is not grammatically correct .
Let me guess , if you meet an auto mechanic wearing a suit and tie , you would automatically trust him more than a second mechanic with a dirty pair of coveralls on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This report is an unreadable messIf you can only communicate and understand things when presented to you in a very specific structured way, you are the minority.
Being thrown off because someone mixed 1 with one means you are either not very flexible, have a reading comprehension problem, just like to bitch, or trying to make yourself seem better by putting other people down.
Bottom line is the teen gave his opinion on some topic, you don;t understand or care about the topic, you only care that it is not grammatically correct.
Let me guess, if you meet an auto mechanic wearing a suit and tie, you would automatically trust him more than a second mechanic with a dirty pair of coveralls on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675881</id>
	<title>Re:Games consoles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247498340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the phone rings and it is one of my son's friends (Matt 16 years old).  He tells me, as he is running out the door, tell Matt I will call him tonight on COD4.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the phone rings and it is one of my son 's friends ( Matt 16 years old ) .
He tells me , as he is running out the door , tell Matt I will call him tonight on COD4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the phone rings and it is one of my son's friends (Matt 16 years old).
He tells me, as he is running out the door, tell Matt I will call him tonight on COD4.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679249</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1247509860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its also the viewpoint of a 15 year old male gamer, so its a pretty narrow snapshot of a narrow demographic though its not an insignificant demographic now that gaming is a multibillion dollar market and game companies do in fact make money unlike Twitter.  His report probably says very little about a 15 year old female demographic and a demographic for those who aren't gamers.</p><p>A fifteen year old boy is likely to sitting at home playing games these days anway and the chat is built in and free so it does make vastly more sense for them to chat with his friends there than to use a metered cell phone or stare at a twitter client full of drivel. American cell phone companies in general are doing everything in their power to destroy their business by charging outrageous fees for bad service.  For a fifteen year old girl the conversation is the game, so they are much more likely to focus their attention on their phones and twitter.  For the gross generalization of the day, men tend to be somewhat escapist from the sordid details of every day life and crave adventure.  Women generally seem to revel in tracking every sordid detail of everyone around them in real life, and that is the game for them, so Twitter is a more natural fit for a female demographic.  Though seem to be loads of clueless men who do twitter and plenty of women gamers who break the generalization.</p><p>The kid does state the obvious that PC games are in deep trouble since big game companies are fed up with the piracy and gamers are fed up with all the cheats in PC games.  This is kind of old news since many of the game companies are already dropping their PC ports, like Madden NFL, in favor of console ports only, unless they are doing subscriptions like WoW.</p><p>A more fascinating thread I'd like to see on Slashdot is the mechanics and economics of "Free" on the Internet.  We seem to rapidly approaching a head where:</p><p>A. Newspapers are all going under since they can't compete with Craigslist and on the Internet for free.  The NY Times is moving to some kind of pay scheme next month which is likely to kill them on the web.</p><p>B. Google is making rivers of money off searc ads and it allows them to attack many other web markets with free products which is going to destroy any incentive for anyone else to enter those markets.  YouTube is thought to be losing somewhere between $200-500 million a year and is only sustainable because Google's search business is subsidizing it.</p><p>C. Everyone under thirty expects everything to be free music, software, books, movies, games, newspapers.  If something they want isn't free they will steal it or opt for a path where it is free.  It is an economic model draining a lot of incentive out of sinking time and money in to creative works if you have doubts about getting compensated for the effort and to pay the bills, put food on the table or a roof over your head. Creative endeavors it seems will have to be done by people already wealthy, support by someone else or by people doing it in their spare time while they also dig ditches for money to support themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its also the viewpoint of a 15 year old male gamer , so its a pretty narrow snapshot of a narrow demographic though its not an insignificant demographic now that gaming is a multibillion dollar market and game companies do in fact make money unlike Twitter .
His report probably says very little about a 15 year old female demographic and a demographic for those who are n't gamers.A fifteen year old boy is likely to sitting at home playing games these days anway and the chat is built in and free so it does make vastly more sense for them to chat with his friends there than to use a metered cell phone or stare at a twitter client full of drivel .
American cell phone companies in general are doing everything in their power to destroy their business by charging outrageous fees for bad service .
For a fifteen year old girl the conversation is the game , so they are much more likely to focus their attention on their phones and twitter .
For the gross generalization of the day , men tend to be somewhat escapist from the sordid details of every day life and crave adventure .
Women generally seem to revel in tracking every sordid detail of everyone around them in real life , and that is the game for them , so Twitter is a more natural fit for a female demographic .
Though seem to be loads of clueless men who do twitter and plenty of women gamers who break the generalization.The kid does state the obvious that PC games are in deep trouble since big game companies are fed up with the piracy and gamers are fed up with all the cheats in PC games .
This is kind of old news since many of the game companies are already dropping their PC ports , like Madden NFL , in favor of console ports only , unless they are doing subscriptions like WoW.A more fascinating thread I 'd like to see on Slashdot is the mechanics and economics of " Free " on the Internet .
We seem to rapidly approaching a head where : A. Newspapers are all going under since they ca n't compete with Craigslist and on the Internet for free .
The NY Times is moving to some kind of pay scheme next month which is likely to kill them on the web.B .
Google is making rivers of money off searc ads and it allows them to attack many other web markets with free products which is going to destroy any incentive for anyone else to enter those markets .
YouTube is thought to be losing somewhere between $ 200-500 million a year and is only sustainable because Google 's search business is subsidizing it.C .
Everyone under thirty expects everything to be free music , software , books , movies , games , newspapers .
If something they want is n't free they will steal it or opt for a path where it is free .
It is an economic model draining a lot of incentive out of sinking time and money in to creative works if you have doubts about getting compensated for the effort and to pay the bills , put food on the table or a roof over your head .
Creative endeavors it seems will have to be done by people already wealthy , support by someone else or by people doing it in their spare time while they also dig ditches for money to support themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its also the viewpoint of a 15 year old male gamer, so its a pretty narrow snapshot of a narrow demographic though its not an insignificant demographic now that gaming is a multibillion dollar market and game companies do in fact make money unlike Twitter.
His report probably says very little about a 15 year old female demographic and a demographic for those who aren't gamers.A fifteen year old boy is likely to sitting at home playing games these days anway and the chat is built in and free so it does make vastly more sense for them to chat with his friends there than to use a metered cell phone or stare at a twitter client full of drivel.
American cell phone companies in general are doing everything in their power to destroy their business by charging outrageous fees for bad service.
For a fifteen year old girl the conversation is the game, so they are much more likely to focus their attention on their phones and twitter.
For the gross generalization of the day, men tend to be somewhat escapist from the sordid details of every day life and crave adventure.
Women generally seem to revel in tracking every sordid detail of everyone around them in real life, and that is the game for them, so Twitter is a more natural fit for a female demographic.
Though seem to be loads of clueless men who do twitter and plenty of women gamers who break the generalization.The kid does state the obvious that PC games are in deep trouble since big game companies are fed up with the piracy and gamers are fed up with all the cheats in PC games.
This is kind of old news since many of the game companies are already dropping their PC ports, like Madden NFL, in favor of console ports only, unless they are doing subscriptions like WoW.A more fascinating thread I'd like to see on Slashdot is the mechanics and economics of "Free" on the Internet.
We seem to rapidly approaching a head where:A. Newspapers are all going under since they can't compete with Craigslist and on the Internet for free.
The NY Times is moving to some kind of pay scheme next month which is likely to kill them on the web.B.
Google is making rivers of money off searc ads and it allows them to attack many other web markets with free products which is going to destroy any incentive for anyone else to enter those markets.
YouTube is thought to be losing somewhere between $200-500 million a year and is only sustainable because Google's search business is subsidizing it.C.
Everyone under thirty expects everything to be free music, software, books, movies, games, newspapers.
If something they want isn't free they will steal it or opt for a path where it is free.
It is an economic model draining a lot of incentive out of sinking time and money in to creative works if you have doubts about getting compensated for the effort and to pay the bills, put food on the table or a roof over your head.
Creative endeavors it seems will have to be done by people already wealthy, support by someone else or by people doing it in their spare time while they also dig ditches for money to support themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677907</id>
	<title>Re:One person's anecdotes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247505480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's just the echo chamber effect. A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology, so he assumes it's true for everyone else. So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks, but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group.</p></div><p>Exactly - I don't understand why this has become such a "media sensation" - it's just one kid's opinion. Hardly a scientific survey detailing what lurks in the mind of today's youth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just the echo chamber effect .
A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology , so he assumes it 's true for everyone else .
So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks , but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group.Exactly - I do n't understand why this has become such a " media sensation " - it 's just one kid 's opinion .
Hardly a scientific survey detailing what lurks in the mind of today 's youth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just the echo chamber effect.
A teenager knows that this is how he and his friends use technology, so he assumes it's true for everyone else.
So the report might be an interesting insight into how he thinks, but totally useless for anyone who wants an actual profile of his age group.Exactly - I don't understand why this has become such a "media sensation" - it's just one kid's opinion.
Hardly a scientific survey detailing what lurks in the mind of today's youth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675261</id>
	<title>I would never have guessed this is the case~</title>
	<author>smooth wombat</author>
	<datestamp>1247495520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>teenagers "realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless".</em>

<br> <br>

Wow.  I'm totally floored.  I would never have guessed that the vast majority of people, more specifically teenagers, don't care when you tweet you're on Main Street and saw a cute girl.  Or, in the case of Gabe, <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/" title="penny-arcade.com">taking a shit</a> [penny-arcade.com].

<br> <br>

Guess this is another example where not having an MBA is an asset.</htmltext>
<tokenext>teenagers " realize that no one is viewing their profile , so their tweets are pointless " .
Wow. I 'm totally floored .
I would never have guessed that the vast majority of people , more specifically teenagers , do n't care when you tweet you 're on Main Street and saw a cute girl .
Or , in the case of Gabe , taking a shit [ penny-arcade.com ] .
Guess this is another example where not having an MBA is an asset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>teenagers "realize that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless".
Wow.  I'm totally floored.
I would never have guessed that the vast majority of people, more specifically teenagers, don't care when you tweet you're on Main Street and saw a cute girl.
Or, in the case of Gabe, taking a shit [penny-arcade.com].
Guess this is another example where not having an MBA is an asset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675563</id>
	<title>Shocking!</title>
	<author>JAlexoi</author>
	<datestamp>1247496960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And World of Warcraft is becoming one very big IRC chat room, with casual topics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And World of Warcraft is becoming one very big IRC chat room , with casual topics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And World of Warcraft is becoming one very big IRC chat room, with casual topics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</id>
	<title>Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>salesgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247495040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article: <b>Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : Morgan Stanley points out that Robson 's assessment of the media landscape does n't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677577</id>
	<title>Hooray</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1247504280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...someone else who finally gets the point that Twitter is stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...someone else who finally gets the point that Twitter is stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...someone else who finally gets the point that Twitter is stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676605</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247501040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must introduce you to my friend Chris Hansen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must introduce you to my friend Chris Hansen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must introduce you to my friend Chris Hansen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675677</id>
	<title>Who's the audience?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247497500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some musician said - a while back - that if you're not into music videos, you should relax. It doesn't mean that you're anti-culture, it just means you're not 14 years old. The obvious implication being that videos were (are?) largely created for the entertainment of teens rather than adults.</p><p>Twitter is clearly a powerful communication tool - witness its use in Iran recently. But it's not particularly aimed at teens, and I struggle to see much that it offers teens that they can't get elsewhere, while at the same time the features that makes Twitter powerful to some constituencies have no value to teens.</p><p>So I see the report as being accurate, but not necessarily having significant insight (except for those who haven't thought much about Twitter and are wondering if/when it will become the next Big Thing with the teen market).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some musician said - a while back - that if you 're not into music videos , you should relax .
It does n't mean that you 're anti-culture , it just means you 're not 14 years old .
The obvious implication being that videos were ( are ?
) largely created for the entertainment of teens rather than adults.Twitter is clearly a powerful communication tool - witness its use in Iran recently .
But it 's not particularly aimed at teens , and I struggle to see much that it offers teens that they ca n't get elsewhere , while at the same time the features that makes Twitter powerful to some constituencies have no value to teens.So I see the report as being accurate , but not necessarily having significant insight ( except for those who have n't thought much about Twitter and are wondering if/when it will become the next Big Thing with the teen market ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some musician said - a while back - that if you're not into music videos, you should relax.
It doesn't mean that you're anti-culture, it just means you're not 14 years old.
The obvious implication being that videos were (are?
) largely created for the entertainment of teens rather than adults.Twitter is clearly a powerful communication tool - witness its use in Iran recently.
But it's not particularly aimed at teens, and I struggle to see much that it offers teens that they can't get elsewhere, while at the same time the features that makes Twitter powerful to some constituencies have no value to teens.So I see the report as being accurate, but not necessarily having significant insight (except for those who haven't thought much about Twitter and are wondering if/when it will become the next Big Thing with the teen market).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679727</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the real reason...</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1247511300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish. <br> <br>

Ya know, I'm not sure it's being self-absorbed that's the problem.  I know people who just can't multitask, like the old saw about people who can't walk and chew gum at the same time.  My grandfather and aunt are/were like this: they just couldn't do two things at once.  It wasn't for lack of smarts, either: he was a self-taught organic chemist with a dozen patents, some quite successful, and she's a graphic designer in high demand.  But they were/are what you'd call oblivious unless you know them, and then you realize that some people seem to be mentally incapable of rapid task switching even after (in granddad's case) 90 years of trying.  My aunt stopped using her cellphone after months of running into doors while trying to talk and walk at the same time, and on the rare occasions where she drives, she says at the beginning of the drive "I cannot talk while I'm driving or I'm likely to have a crash, so please don't talk."  She's learned this from experience (and a couple of wrecked cars) after 40 years of trying.  Maybe the woman who fell into the manhole just hasn't figured this out about herself yet.<br>
For that matter, I've seen half a dozen guys walk straight into walls or trip over chairs because they were too busy checking out my gf's butt to watch where they were going.  Smart people can realize when their priorities have shifted and they're about to do something stupid, but even smart people need some experience to develop the skill to notice when they're about to do something stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish .
Ya know , I 'm not sure it 's being self-absorbed that 's the problem .
I know people who just ca n't multitask , like the old saw about people who ca n't walk and chew gum at the same time .
My grandfather and aunt are/were like this : they just could n't do two things at once .
It was n't for lack of smarts , either : he was a self-taught organic chemist with a dozen patents , some quite successful , and she 's a graphic designer in high demand .
But they were/are what you 'd call oblivious unless you know them , and then you realize that some people seem to be mentally incapable of rapid task switching even after ( in granddad 's case ) 90 years of trying .
My aunt stopped using her cellphone after months of running into doors while trying to talk and walk at the same time , and on the rare occasions where she drives , she says at the beginning of the drive " I can not talk while I 'm driving or I 'm likely to have a crash , so please do n't talk .
" She 's learned this from experience ( and a couple of wrecked cars ) after 40 years of trying .
Maybe the woman who fell into the manhole just has n't figured this out about herself yet .
For that matter , I 've seen half a dozen guys walk straight into walls or trip over chairs because they were too busy checking out my gf 's butt to watch where they were going .
Smart people can realize when their priorities have shifted and they 're about to do something stupid , but even smart people need some experience to develop the skill to notice when they 're about to do something stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I love people that are so utterly self-absorbed and oblivious to their surroundings that they can do something this foolish.
Ya know, I'm not sure it's being self-absorbed that's the problem.
I know people who just can't multitask, like the old saw about people who can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
My grandfather and aunt are/were like this: they just couldn't do two things at once.
It wasn't for lack of smarts, either: he was a self-taught organic chemist with a dozen patents, some quite successful, and she's a graphic designer in high demand.
But they were/are what you'd call oblivious unless you know them, and then you realize that some people seem to be mentally incapable of rapid task switching even after (in granddad's case) 90 years of trying.
My aunt stopped using her cellphone after months of running into doors while trying to talk and walk at the same time, and on the rare occasions where she drives, she says at the beginning of the drive "I cannot talk while I'm driving or I'm likely to have a crash, so please don't talk.
"  She's learned this from experience (and a couple of wrecked cars) after 40 years of trying.
Maybe the woman who fell into the manhole just hasn't figured this out about herself yet.
For that matter, I've seen half a dozen guys walk straight into walls or trip over chairs because they were too busy checking out my gf's butt to watch where they were going.
Smart people can realize when their priorities have shifted and they're about to do something stupid, but even smart people need some experience to develop the skill to notice when they're about to do something stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675281</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>TyrainDreams</author>
	<datestamp>1247495580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Robson also had bad news for the mobile phone operators, claiming that games consoles have become a more attractive medium for chatting to friends than their phones. "</p><p>Yes I'm sure a 15 year old would rather chat with his friends in Halo than on a Cell phone but it doesn't change the fact that Cell phones are still what the rest of the world uses to communicate, last I checked you can't pocket a PS3, and even if you pull the DS card, it then becomes just a GSM transceiver away from being a cell phone.</p><p>"The 15-year-old poured scorn on social-networking site of the moment, Twitter, claiming that teenagers don't use it because "they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless"."</p><p>Absolute bollocks, teenagers don't use twitter because THEY CANT AFFORD MOBILE PLANS FOR THE VOLUME OF MESSAGES IT TAKES TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE FUCKING JOBS. Also you cant completely trash the appearance of your profile and put a really bad post-punk emo song somewhere hard to turn off that auto-plays on load.</p><p>I'd like to see his actual writing. But I would not invest in a company who listens to a 15 year old's tirade with no basis in fact or logic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Robson also had bad news for the mobile phone operators , claiming that games consoles have become a more attractive medium for chatting to friends than their phones .
" Yes I 'm sure a 15 year old would rather chat with his friends in Halo than on a Cell phone but it does n't change the fact that Cell phones are still what the rest of the world uses to communicate , last I checked you ca n't pocket a PS3 , and even if you pull the DS card , it then becomes just a GSM transceiver away from being a cell phone .
" The 15-year-old poured scorn on social-networking site of the moment , Twitter , claiming that teenagers do n't use it because " they realise that no one is viewing their profile , so their tweets are pointless " .
" Absolute bollocks , teenagers do n't use twitter because THEY CANT AFFORD MOBILE PLANS FOR THE VOLUME OF MESSAGES IT TAKES TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY DO N'T HAVE FUCKING JOBS .
Also you cant completely trash the appearance of your profile and put a really bad post-punk emo song somewhere hard to turn off that auto-plays on load.I 'd like to see his actual writing .
But I would not invest in a company who listens to a 15 year old 's tirade with no basis in fact or logic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Robson also had bad news for the mobile phone operators, claiming that games consoles have become a more attractive medium for chatting to friends than their phones.
"Yes I'm sure a 15 year old would rather chat with his friends in Halo than on a Cell phone but it doesn't change the fact that Cell phones are still what the rest of the world uses to communicate, last I checked you can't pocket a PS3, and even if you pull the DS card, it then becomes just a GSM transceiver away from being a cell phone.
"The 15-year-old poured scorn on social-networking site of the moment, Twitter, claiming that teenagers don't use it because "they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their tweets are pointless".
"Absolute bollocks, teenagers don't use twitter because THEY CANT AFFORD MOBILE PLANS FOR THE VOLUME OF MESSAGES IT TAKES TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE FUCKING JOBS.
Also you cant completely trash the appearance of your profile and put a really bad post-punk emo song somewhere hard to turn off that auto-plays on load.I'd like to see his actual writing.
But I would not invest in a company who listens to a 15 year old's tirade with no basis in fact or logic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683347</id>
	<title>Bah.  Humbug!</title>
	<author>LrdDimwit</author>
	<datestamp>1247482680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe she might learn something.  Teenagers do that all the time, even though many of them would hate to admit it.<br>
<br>Perhaps she had better die, and decrease the surplus population?  Seriously, Scrooge, there is an important difference between "some idiot needs to learn to watch where she's going" and "someone kill this idiot".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe she might learn something .
Teenagers do that all the time , even though many of them would hate to admit it .
Perhaps she had better die , and decrease the surplus population ?
Seriously , Scrooge , there is an important difference between " some idiot needs to learn to watch where she 's going " and " someone kill this idiot " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe she might learn something.
Teenagers do that all the time, even though many of them would hate to admit it.
Perhaps she had better die, and decrease the surplus population?
Seriously, Scrooge, there is an important difference between "some idiot needs to learn to watch where she's going" and "someone kill this idiot".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675925</id>
	<title>Who cares anyway?</title>
	<author>SeeSp0tRun</author>
	<datestamp>1247498580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps I am one of the few people in the world without a FaceBook, MySpace, Twitter, Digg, or any other social networking site in my pocket, with my fingers just itching to tell the world all about me.
<br> <br>
My question is: "Who cares?"  Twitter especially... I don't care what you are doing at this very moment.  If it were worth me hearing about, I have a perfectly good AIM/MSN/Email/Phone.  Give me a call, tell me about it.  Everyone is concerned about "big brother," and then willingly contribute their "tweets" for the world.
<br> <br>
Whatever happened to actually interacting with friends, and not "tweeting that you are tweeting?"
I would just like to point out that this is barring the great job it is doing for Iranians in their political push... THAT is good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps I am one of the few people in the world without a FaceBook , MySpace , Twitter , Digg , or any other social networking site in my pocket , with my fingers just itching to tell the world all about me .
My question is : " Who cares ?
" Twitter especially... I do n't care what you are doing at this very moment .
If it were worth me hearing about , I have a perfectly good AIM/MSN/Email/Phone .
Give me a call , tell me about it .
Everyone is concerned about " big brother , " and then willingly contribute their " tweets " for the world .
Whatever happened to actually interacting with friends , and not " tweeting that you are tweeting ?
" I would just like to point out that this is barring the great job it is doing for Iranians in their political push... THAT is good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps I am one of the few people in the world without a FaceBook, MySpace, Twitter, Digg, or any other social networking site in my pocket, with my fingers just itching to tell the world all about me.
My question is: "Who cares?
"  Twitter especially... I don't care what you are doing at this very moment.
If it were worth me hearing about, I have a perfectly good AIM/MSN/Email/Phone.
Give me a call, tell me about it.
Everyone is concerned about "big brother," and then willingly contribute their "tweets" for the world.
Whatever happened to actually interacting with friends, and not "tweeting that you are tweeting?
"
I would just like to point out that this is barring the great job it is doing for Iranians in their political push... THAT is good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677017</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the Report?</title>
	<author>LQ</author>
	<datestamp>1247502360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Has anyone actually found the damn report?</p></div><p>As somebody above helpfully said, there's a copy <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/5817515/Teenager-causes-City-sensation-with-research-on-media-report-in-full.html" title="telegraph.co.uk" rel="nofollow">here.</a> [telegraph.co.uk] Fairly thin stuff, sweeping generalisations etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone actually found the damn report ? As somebody above helpfully said , there 's a copy here .
[ telegraph.co.uk ] Fairly thin stuff , sweeping generalisations etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone actually found the damn report?As somebody above helpfully said, there's a copy here.
[telegraph.co.uk] Fairly thin stuff, sweeping generalisations etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676361</id>
	<title>Re:I've Heard This Story Before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And as for the child, he was taken to the deepest dungeon of the castle.  I will not describe what fates befel him there, but rest assured, dear reader, that before he died he described the Emperor's new clothes most fully, praising every glowing detail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And as for the child , he was taken to the deepest dungeon of the castle .
I will not describe what fates befel him there , but rest assured , dear reader , that before he died he described the Emperor 's new clothes most fully , praising every glowing detail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And as for the child, he was taken to the deepest dungeon of the castle.
I will not describe what fates befel him there, but rest assured, dear reader, that before he died he described the Emperor's new clothes most fully, praising every glowing detail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683491</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>DefenderThree</author>
	<datestamp>1247483280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you really think the average outraged teenager/citizen is going to have the time, resources, or know-how to assemble Paranoid Linux, XNet with Tor, gnupg, WiFi sniffers, security tools, etc.? Why would anyone in their right mind do that when a public, mass outlet has emerged for similar expression? Further you gain credibility by having multiple, collaborated sources, far more than some literally untraceable, anonymous internet source. One blog entry isn't noticeable or likely to get attention, 10,000 agreeing Twits definitely is.

Pragmatics aside I can't believe you're encouraging "revolutionaries" to comply with government suppression. Doesn't that defeat the point of an uprising? Maybe all the Iranians should just listen to the police, go back inside peacefully, stop telling the world what's going on and accept the latest government announcement. Maybe while they listen they can invite over one of their 100s of Linux-qualified friends to help them set up an anonymous network connection!

Twitter isn't going to save the world but it has a way better chance than anonymous Linux browsing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think the average outraged teenager/citizen is going to have the time , resources , or know-how to assemble Paranoid Linux , XNet with Tor , gnupg , WiFi sniffers , security tools , etc. ?
Why would anyone in their right mind do that when a public , mass outlet has emerged for similar expression ?
Further you gain credibility by having multiple , collaborated sources , far more than some literally untraceable , anonymous internet source .
One blog entry is n't noticeable or likely to get attention , 10,000 agreeing Twits definitely is .
Pragmatics aside I ca n't believe you 're encouraging " revolutionaries " to comply with government suppression .
Does n't that defeat the point of an uprising ?
Maybe all the Iranians should just listen to the police , go back inside peacefully , stop telling the world what 's going on and accept the latest government announcement .
Maybe while they listen they can invite over one of their 100s of Linux-qualified friends to help them set up an anonymous network connection !
Twitter is n't going to save the world but it has a way better chance than anonymous Linux browsing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think the average outraged teenager/citizen is going to have the time, resources, or know-how to assemble Paranoid Linux, XNet with Tor, gnupg, WiFi sniffers, security tools, etc.?
Why would anyone in their right mind do that when a public, mass outlet has emerged for similar expression?
Further you gain credibility by having multiple, collaborated sources, far more than some literally untraceable, anonymous internet source.
One blog entry isn't noticeable or likely to get attention, 10,000 agreeing Twits definitely is.
Pragmatics aside I can't believe you're encouraging "revolutionaries" to comply with government suppression.
Doesn't that defeat the point of an uprising?
Maybe all the Iranians should just listen to the police, go back inside peacefully, stop telling the world what's going on and accept the latest government announcement.
Maybe while they listen they can invite over one of their 100s of Linux-qualified friends to help them set up an anonymous network connection!
Twitter isn't going to save the world but it has a way better chance than anonymous Linux browsing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676611</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like the next Theodore Kaczynski</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1247501100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life."</p><p>This doesn't disqualify him from commenting on his peers' behavior, does it?</p><p>"I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia."</p><p>I'm pretty sure this is both an abberation (a good one, BTW, and I applaud it) and not related to the behavior of 15-year-olds using Twitter for less noble purposes.  Which is fine too.</p><p>"Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones? How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them?"</p><p>You may have missed the point.  Texting is replacing voice.  Consoles are competing very well for teens' texting business.  Voice is still not practical on consoles.  But fear not.  Consoles and phones are converging.  You won't have this dilemma in a couple of years, tops.  Oh yeah, your next point will be moot then, if not earlier.</p><p>"This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst."</p><p>Excellent idea.  Right after he finished his work experience.  How many of his peers are busy this summer watching ANOTHER TWILIGHT MOVIE! OMG! and woofing Aspartame by the pint?  I pick this kid to be the winner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Seriously , this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life .
" This does n't disqualify him from commenting on his peers ' behavior , does it ?
" I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia .
" I 'm pretty sure this is both an abberation ( a good one , BTW , and I applaud it ) and not related to the behavior of 15-year-olds using Twitter for less noble purposes .
Which is fine too .
" Twitter is one thing , but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones ?
How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them ?
" You may have missed the point .
Texting is replacing voice .
Consoles are competing very well for teens ' texting business .
Voice is still not practical on consoles .
But fear not .
Consoles and phones are converging .
You wo n't have this dilemma in a couple of years , tops .
Oh yeah , your next point will be moot then , if not earlier .
" This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst .
" Excellent idea .
Right after he finished his work experience .
How many of his peers are busy this summer watching ANOTHER TWILIGHT MOVIE !
OMG ! and woofing Aspartame by the pint ?
I pick this kid to be the winner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life.
"This doesn't disqualify him from commenting on his peers' behavior, does it?
"I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia.
"I'm pretty sure this is both an abberation (a good one, BTW, and I applaud it) and not related to the behavior of 15-year-olds using Twitter for less noble purposes.
Which is fine too.
"Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones?
How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them?
"You may have missed the point.
Texting is replacing voice.
Consoles are competing very well for teens' texting business.
Voice is still not practical on consoles.
But fear not.
Consoles and phones are converging.
You won't have this dilemma in a couple of years, tops.
Oh yeah, your next point will be moot then, if not earlier.
"This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst.
"Excellent idea.
Right after he finished his work experience.
How many of his peers are busy this summer watching ANOTHER TWILIGHT MOVIE!
OMG! and woofing Aspartame by the pint?
I pick this kid to be the winner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675853</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247498220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</p></div></blockquote><p>No kidding...  It reads as if he's assuming that just because he and his five friends don't use Twitter, it follows that nobody his age uses Twitter.  And then he just makes up some random reasons to support his claim.  How does he know *why* teenagers don't use it; has he done any research?  Or just picked the first thing that flew into his head?</p><p>I could have written a report when I was that age saying that no teenager watches NASCAR or soccer because I didn't and most of my friends didn't.</p><p>I don't blame the kid for writing this way (he's not old enough to know better), but I find it bizarre that Morgan Stanley would take this seriously.</p><p>I always find it annoying when the media or a company takes the say-so of one individual and thinks that one person could possible speak for all teenagers / African-Americans / middle-aged white people / etc...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : Morgan Stanley points out that Robson 's assessment of the media landscape does n't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.No kidding... It reads as if he 's assuming that just because he and his five friends do n't use Twitter , it follows that nobody his age uses Twitter .
And then he just makes up some random reasons to support his claim .
How does he know * why * teenagers do n't use it ; has he done any research ?
Or just picked the first thing that flew into his head ? I could have written a report when I was that age saying that no teenager watches NASCAR or soccer because I did n't and most of my friends did n't.I do n't blame the kid for writing this way ( he 's not old enough to know better ) , but I find it bizarre that Morgan Stanley would take this seriously.I always find it annoying when the media or a company takes the say-so of one individual and thinks that one person could possible speak for all teenagers / African-Americans / middle-aged white people / etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.No kidding...  It reads as if he's assuming that just because he and his five friends don't use Twitter, it follows that nobody his age uses Twitter.
And then he just makes up some random reasons to support his claim.
How does he know *why* teenagers don't use it; has he done any research?
Or just picked the first thing that flew into his head?I could have written a report when I was that age saying that no teenager watches NASCAR or soccer because I didn't and most of my friends didn't.I don't blame the kid for writing this way (he's not old enough to know better), but I find it bizarre that Morgan Stanley would take this seriously.I always find it annoying when the media or a company takes the say-so of one individual and thinks that one person could possible speak for all teenagers / African-Americans / middle-aged white people / etc...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680097</id>
	<title>Cognitive dissonance?</title>
	<author>holmstar</author>
	<datestamp>1247512440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing that there are a lot of people that don't like twitter, for whatever reason.  Maybe because they are this big VC company that has no business model.  Maybe because the site seems to be the hip thing right now, and you despise anything that is considered hip.  But really, you have no solid reason to despise it...  yet you do.  </p><p>
So along comes a kid who gives you some reasons that he believes twitter will fail.  And HAZZA! you now can feel like your distrust of twitter is well-founded because he agrees with you.  Even though this is just one kid's opinion you give it more weight because it makes you feel good about your own position.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing that there are a lot of people that do n't like twitter , for whatever reason .
Maybe because they are this big VC company that has no business model .
Maybe because the site seems to be the hip thing right now , and you despise anything that is considered hip .
But really , you have no solid reason to despise it... yet you do .
So along comes a kid who gives you some reasons that he believes twitter will fail .
And HAZZA !
you now can feel like your distrust of twitter is well-founded because he agrees with you .
Even though this is just one kid 's opinion you give it more weight because it makes you feel good about your own position .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing that there are a lot of people that don't like twitter, for whatever reason.
Maybe because they are this big VC company that has no business model.
Maybe because the site seems to be the hip thing right now, and you despise anything that is considered hip.
But really, you have no solid reason to despise it...  yet you do.
So along comes a kid who gives you some reasons that he believes twitter will fail.
And HAZZA!
you now can feel like your distrust of twitter is well-founded because he agrees with you.
Even though this is just one kid's opinion you give it more weight because it makes you feel good about your own position.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676849</id>
	<title>Re:Nice disclaimer</title>
	<author>Registered Coward v2</author>
	<datestamp>1247501760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From the article: <b>Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.</b> </p></div><p>Translation:</p><p>"We felt we could get some PR by putting this out."</p><p>Of course, most "analysts" reports are useless anyway - many have no clue about the industry they cover, and merely spout whatever they hear from the analyst calls; so a 15 year old's anecdotal report is probably as good as most others.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : Morgan Stanley points out that Robson 's assessment of the media landscape does n't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports .
Translation : " We felt we could get some PR by putting this out .
" Of course , most " analysts " reports are useless anyway - many have no clue about the industry they cover , and merely spout whatever they hear from the analyst calls ; so a 15 year old 's anecdotal report is probably as good as most others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: Morgan Stanley points out that Robson's assessment of the media landscape doesn't have the statistical rigour of its regular reports.
Translation:"We felt we could get some PR by putting this out.
"Of course, most "analysts" reports are useless anyway - many have no clue about the industry they cover, and merely spout whatever they hear from the analyst calls; so a 15 year old's anecdotal report is probably as good as most others.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676805</id>
	<title>Pointless?</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1247501700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depending on what you choose to tweet about (notice I used that verb without quotes...not sure why), writing down your daily thoughts is hardly pointless.  I realize many people think Twitter is about putting yourself in front of other people but it doesn't have to be.  Consider it a diary that you don't mind people reading.</p><p>Excuse me while I tweet about by<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. post.</p><p>Dear god, is that crossing the streams?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depending on what you choose to tweet about ( notice I used that verb without quotes...not sure why ) , writing down your daily thoughts is hardly pointless .
I realize many people think Twitter is about putting yourself in front of other people but it does n't have to be .
Consider it a diary that you do n't mind people reading.Excuse me while I tweet about by / .
post.Dear god , is that crossing the streams ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depending on what you choose to tweet about (notice I used that verb without quotes...not sure why), writing down your daily thoughts is hardly pointless.
I realize many people think Twitter is about putting yourself in front of other people but it doesn't have to be.
Consider it a diary that you don't mind people reading.Excuse me while I tweet about by /.
post.Dear god, is that crossing the streams?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28692075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28685875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675411
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28695977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28770109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1310215_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675359
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675395
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676511
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675771
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28680799
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676453
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675803
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676235
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686741
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679727
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683077
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679733
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28682989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675801
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683251
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28681379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676009
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675931
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675853
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28685875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675765
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677237
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677557
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683491
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28695977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28686379
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28679701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675459
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675331
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675385
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677931
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678287
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28770109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28692075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675575
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1310215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28675551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28683461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28677731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28676207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1310215.28678281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
