<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_13_1229250</id>
	<title>What To Expect From Apple's Rumored MacPad</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1247489280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.reifman.org/" rel="nofollow">Jeff</a> writes <i>"I decided to review the specifications of recent e-readers and mobile devices as well as the ongoing Apple rumor mill to chart out the most likely features, innovations and <a href="http://www.idealog.us/2009/07/apple-mac-tablet-predictions.html">configuration we can expect from Apple's long awaited Newton successor/Mac Tablet</a> which I'll call the MacPad.  The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10, with a 10" diagonal color display, a $599 price point with a Verizon data plan, a stylus, note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes. Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too. Past failed Newtonian predictions by others  <a href="//apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/28/1942202&amp;tid=438">are available on Slashdot</a> and the likelihood that any of this is right can be gauged by earlier Confucian gems such as <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/27/0310201&amp;tid=543">Haskin warns that Apple may be setting itself up for a failure with the iPhone</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeff writes " I decided to review the specifications of recent e-readers and mobile devices as well as the ongoing Apple rumor mill to chart out the most likely features , innovations and configuration we can expect from Apple 's long awaited Newton successor/Mac Tablet which I 'll call the MacPad .
The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10 , with a 10 " diagonal color display , a $ 599 price point with a Verizon data plan , a stylus , note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes .
Apple 's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too .
Past failed Newtonian predictions by others are available on Slashdot and the likelihood that any of this is right can be gauged by earlier Confucian gems such as Haskin warns that Apple may be setting itself up for a failure with the iPhone .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeff writes "I decided to review the specifications of recent e-readers and mobile devices as well as the ongoing Apple rumor mill to chart out the most likely features, innovations and configuration we can expect from Apple's long awaited Newton successor/Mac Tablet which I'll call the MacPad.
The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10, with a 10" diagonal color display, a $599 price point with a Verizon data plan, a stylus, note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes.
Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too.
Past failed Newtonian predictions by others  are available on Slashdot and the likelihood that any of this is right can be gauged by earlier Confucian gems such as Haskin warns that Apple may be setting itself up for a failure with the iPhone.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674989</id>
	<title>$599 is a rip off</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1247493840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>minis are $599</p><p>if it reaced something like the iPhone then it's ok. As an extra device $599 is too much when netbooks are $199</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>minis are $ 599if it reaced something like the iPhone then it 's ok. As an extra device $ 599 is too much when netbooks are $ 199</tokentext>
<sentencetext>minis are $599if it reaced something like the iPhone then it's ok. As an extra device $599 is too much when netbooks are $199</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674951</id>
	<title>Speculation if fun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sound almost nothing like what Gizmodo is reporting: "It'll land in October, to be exact, when we should expect to pay around $800 for it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sound almost nothing like what Gizmodo is reporting : " It 'll land in October , to be exact , when we should expect to pay around $ 800 for it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sound almost nothing like what Gizmodo is reporting: "It'll land in October, to be exact, when we should expect to pay around $800 for it.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675775</id>
	<title>Re:Apparent RAM upgrade :)</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247497860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody said it was small. It's actually an iMac with a 10" touchscreen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody said it was small .
It 's actually an iMac with a 10 " touchscreen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody said it was small.
It's actually an iMac with a 10" touchscreen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675057</id>
	<title>If it is tied to Verizon</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1247494200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will absolutely fail in Apple's user base. The only two groups that will shell out for it are the people who don't have iPhones and the fanbois who would buy a service plan with every single mobile provider if Apple released an exclusive product through each one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will absolutely fail in Apple 's user base .
The only two groups that will shell out for it are the people who do n't have iPhones and the fanbois who would buy a service plan with every single mobile provider if Apple released an exclusive product through each one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will absolutely fail in Apple's user base.
The only two groups that will shell out for it are the people who don't have iPhones and the fanbois who would buy a service plan with every single mobile provider if Apple released an exclusive product through each one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675369</id>
	<title>Re:Apparent RAM upgrade :)</title>
	<author>Atticka</author>
	<datestamp>1247495940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you! I was going to post the same thing.</p><p>It's hard to take this article seriously when they confuse disk/flash storage with RAM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you !
I was going to post the same thing.It 's hard to take this article seriously when they confuse disk/flash storage with RAM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you!
I was going to post the same thing.It's hard to take this article seriously when they confuse disk/flash storage with RAM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674941</id>
	<title>If children are our future...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then I weep for our future:</p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31853449/ns/local\_news-new\_york\_ny/?GT1=43001" title="msn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31853449/ns/local\_news-new\_york\_ny/?GT1=43001</a> [msn.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then I weep for our future : http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31853449/ns/local \ _news-new \ _york \ _ny/ ? GT1 = 43001 [ msn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then I weep for our future:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31853449/ns/local\_news-new\_york\_ny/?GT1=43001 [msn.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675313</id>
	<title>setting itself up for failure?</title>
	<author>hrbrmstr</author>
	<datestamp>1247495700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>(Mostly replying to the ending sentence of the post)
<br> <br>
Unless Apple really has a complete QA failure with a future OS upgrade or new device release, they will remain in front of the other device manufacturers for a very long time. They will be free to pick-and-choose which interesting &amp; successful bits they steal and then super-engineer/implement from Android, Palm, Microsoft, etc and continue their lead.
<br> <br>
I'm still convinced these netbook/tablet rumors are just that - rumors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Mostly replying to the ending sentence of the post ) Unless Apple really has a complete QA failure with a future OS upgrade or new device release , they will remain in front of the other device manufacturers for a very long time .
They will be free to pick-and-choose which interesting &amp; successful bits they steal and then super-engineer/implement from Android , Palm , Microsoft , etc and continue their lead .
I 'm still convinced these netbook/tablet rumors are just that - rumors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Mostly replying to the ending sentence of the post)
 
Unless Apple really has a complete QA failure with a future OS upgrade or new device release, they will remain in front of the other device manufacturers for a very long time.
They will be free to pick-and-choose which interesting &amp; successful bits they steal and then super-engineer/implement from Android, Palm, Microsoft, etc and continue their lead.
I'm still convinced these netbook/tablet rumors are just that - rumors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28680681</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247514780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To avoid getting a shitty dick or a sore ass?</htmltext>
<tokenext>To avoid getting a shitty dick or a sore ass ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To avoid getting a shitty dick or a sore ass?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28679019</id>
	<title>Macpad? Bah. Crunchpad!</title>
	<author>Bysshe</author>
	<datestamp>1247509020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw the MacPad. Give me a <a href="http://www.crunchpad.com/" title="crunchpad.com" rel="nofollow">Crunchpad</a> [crunchpad.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw the MacPad .
Give me a Crunchpad [ crunchpad.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw the MacPad.
Give me a Crunchpad [crunchpad.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676201</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>mambodog</author>
	<datestamp>1247499780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slow news day, huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slow news day , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slow news day, huh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013</id>
	<title>WTF.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1247494020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it?
<br> <br>
I hate to argue about the "slashdottedness" of a post, but I don't see how this belongs here. This kind of conversation is more appropriate in MacRumors or sites like it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it ?
I hate to argue about the " slashdottedness " of a post , but I do n't see how this belongs here .
This kind of conversation is more appropriate in MacRumors or sites like it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it?
I hate to argue about the "slashdottedness" of a post, but I don't see how this belongs here.
This kind of conversation is more appropriate in MacRumors or sites like it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674993</id>
	<title>A keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would prefer the device to be a little thicker with a slide out keyboard.  Requiring Bluetooth for a keyboard makes my laptop more convenient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would prefer the device to be a little thicker with a slide out keyboard .
Requiring Bluetooth for a keyboard makes my laptop more convenient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would prefer the device to be a little thicker with a slide out keyboard.
Requiring Bluetooth for a keyboard makes my laptop more convenient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674921</id>
	<title>All this talk of Newton's ghost</title>
	<author>Centurix</author>
	<datestamp>1247493420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally I think Newton's zombie would be a great name for a MacPad. iZombie.</p><p>Plus it'd be a clean, sterile looking zombie, none of this blood, dirt and torn clothes. A MetroZombie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I think Newton 's zombie would be a great name for a MacPad .
iZombie.Plus it 'd be a clean , sterile looking zombie , none of this blood , dirt and torn clothes .
A MetroZombie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I think Newton's zombie would be a great name for a MacPad.
iZombie.Plus it'd be a clean, sterile looking zombie, none of this blood, dirt and torn clothes.
A MetroZombie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1247496360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?</p></div><p>Haha ok let me break this down to you. First of all that "perfectly good" part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees. Secondly there are <i>huge</i> differences between unix like OSs. And last but not least, some people like to own whatever they've bought rather than lease it. That's why.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware , and lots of application support , and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that does n't do the half of it... Why ? Haha ok let me break this down to you .
First of all that " perfectly good " part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees .
Secondly there are huge differences between unix like OSs .
And last but not least , some people like to own whatever they 've bought rather than lease it .
That 's why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?Haha ok let me break this down to you.
First of all that "perfectly good" part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees.
Secondly there are huge differences between unix like OSs.
And last but not least, some people like to own whatever they've bought rather than lease it.
That's why.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675579</id>
	<title>Re:Stylus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247497080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I assume you'll be finger painting to take notes with it?  There's no reason why it can't be have both multitouch input from fingers and stylus support.  The stylus should be analogous to a pencil not a navigation device like traditional pdas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I assume you 'll be finger painting to take notes with it ?
There 's no reason why it ca n't be have both multitouch input from fingers and stylus support .
The stylus should be analogous to a pencil not a navigation device like traditional pdas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I assume you'll be finger painting to take notes with it?
There's no reason why it can't be have both multitouch input from fingers and stylus support.
The stylus should be analogous to a pencil not a navigation device like traditional pdas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677535</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>Skuld-Chan</author>
	<datestamp>1247504220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowing apple its going to be proprietary<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing apple its going to be proprietary : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing apple its going to be proprietary :).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676163</id>
	<title>Re:Hey! Let's Just make Shit up!</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1247499480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't say substantiated and it is more evidence that if you repeat a rumor enough times, people think it's fact.  The first article if you trace it back is that an unnamed source at a Taiwan company, Wintek, said that Apple will be receiving 10" screens in the fall.  There was no mention of how many screens though which makes a difference if Apple ordered 10,000 as opposed to 1 million.  So the article itself was somewhat of a rumor.   Now the original article did say that they had no idea what Apple intended.  So the source of the rumor wasn't knowledgeable enough to address that aspect meaning the source wasn't part of the negotiations.  It could be that the source got details wrong like he meant 3" screens which would mean a slightly larger iPod/iPhone etc.  As for general uses for large screen, I can think of another use:  XServe racks could use them and other rack server systems do have them.  Adding touch screens to them would be nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't say substantiated and it is more evidence that if you repeat a rumor enough times , people think it 's fact .
The first article if you trace it back is that an unnamed source at a Taiwan company , Wintek , said that Apple will be receiving 10 " screens in the fall .
There was no mention of how many screens though which makes a difference if Apple ordered 10,000 as opposed to 1 million .
So the article itself was somewhat of a rumor .
Now the original article did say that they had no idea what Apple intended .
So the source of the rumor was n't knowledgeable enough to address that aspect meaning the source was n't part of the negotiations .
It could be that the source got details wrong like he meant 3 " screens which would mean a slightly larger iPod/iPhone etc .
As for general uses for large screen , I can think of another use : XServe racks could use them and other rack server systems do have them .
Adding touch screens to them would be nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't say substantiated and it is more evidence that if you repeat a rumor enough times, people think it's fact.
The first article if you trace it back is that an unnamed source at a Taiwan company, Wintek, said that Apple will be receiving 10" screens in the fall.
There was no mention of how many screens though which makes a difference if Apple ordered 10,000 as opposed to 1 million.
So the article itself was somewhat of a rumor.
Now the original article did say that they had no idea what Apple intended.
So the source of the rumor wasn't knowledgeable enough to address that aspect meaning the source wasn't part of the negotiations.
It could be that the source got details wrong like he meant 3" screens which would mean a slightly larger iPod/iPhone etc.
As for general uses for large screen, I can think of another use:  XServe racks could use them and other rack server systems do have them.
Adding touch screens to them would be nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676313</id>
	<title>DRM?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247500200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why is DRM in the keywords? itunes music store got rid of their drm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why is DRM in the keywords ?
itunes music store got rid of their drm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why is DRM in the keywords?
itunes music store got rid of their drm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676103</id>
	<title>Re:WTF.</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1247499240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it?</p></div><p>You mean like the "leaked" iPhone photos that turned out to be the Sony Ericsson P800?</p><p>Where's that iPhone Nano?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it ? You mean like the " leaked " iPhone photos that turned out to be the Sony Ericsson P800 ? Where 's that iPhone Nano ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How are these far-fetched predictions any different than the many that were made for the iPhone and iPod before it?You mean like the "leaked" iPhone photos that turned out to be the Sony Ericsson P800?Where's that iPhone Nano?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675219</id>
	<title>Stylus</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247495340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about the rest of the specs, but the stylus seems really, really unlikely.  Apple is all about touch these days, and especially if this thing is running a variant of iPhoneOS rather than Mac OS X, it'll <i>need</i> multitouch input <i>with fingers</i> to work well.  Plus, a stylus-using screen is just too TabletPC-like (i.e. Microsoft's big idea from 2001), and can you imagine Apple coming out with a device that will invite comparisons to the ModBook (i.e. someone else's design from 2007)?  That would smack of playing "catch up" and introducing a "me too" product.  Does that sound like Apple?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about the rest of the specs , but the stylus seems really , really unlikely .
Apple is all about touch these days , and especially if this thing is running a variant of iPhoneOS rather than Mac OS X , it 'll need multitouch input with fingers to work well .
Plus , a stylus-using screen is just too TabletPC-like ( i.e .
Microsoft 's big idea from 2001 ) , and can you imagine Apple coming out with a device that will invite comparisons to the ModBook ( i.e .
someone else 's design from 2007 ) ?
That would smack of playing " catch up " and introducing a " me too " product .
Does that sound like Apple ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about the rest of the specs, but the stylus seems really, really unlikely.
Apple is all about touch these days, and especially if this thing is running a variant of iPhoneOS rather than Mac OS X, it'll need multitouch input with fingers to work well.
Plus, a stylus-using screen is just too TabletPC-like (i.e.
Microsoft's big idea from 2001), and can you imagine Apple coming out with a device that will invite comparisons to the ModBook (i.e.
someone else's design from 2007)?
That would smack of playing "catch up" and introducing a "me too" product.
Does that sound like Apple?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677961</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247505600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure he means 64-128 GB of SSD (ie. Flash RAM)</p><p>Interesting idea but unless the battery can easily be replaced then I will never own one.  I'm sick of "broken" iPods, iPhones and other Apple crap because the battery is dead.  Yes, they can be replaced with a lot of effort (and often damage) but it's not worth it.  This is planned obsolescence where Apple is sucking more and more money from me (not unlike their OS upgrades and other larger hardware changes).  Fuck that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure he means 64-128 GB of SSD ( ie .
Flash RAM ) Interesting idea but unless the battery can easily be replaced then I will never own one .
I 'm sick of " broken " iPods , iPhones and other Apple crap because the battery is dead .
Yes , they can be replaced with a lot of effort ( and often damage ) but it 's not worth it .
This is planned obsolescence where Apple is sucking more and more money from me ( not unlike their OS upgrades and other larger hardware changes ) .
Fuck that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure he means 64-128 GB of SSD (ie.
Flash RAM)Interesting idea but unless the battery can easily be replaced then I will never own one.
I'm sick of "broken" iPods, iPhones and other Apple crap because the battery is dead.
Yes, they can be replaced with a lot of effort (and often damage) but it's not worth it.
This is planned obsolescence where Apple is sucking more and more money from me (not unlike their OS upgrades and other larger hardware changes).
Fuck that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677885</id>
	<title>Re:Mac Tablet History</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1247505360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire</p></div><p>

But it's been smoking for 6 years. Are you going to keep the firetruck stationed there the entire time?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides, the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop.</p></div><p>
Wow! It's almost like the <i>reason</i> for the rumor not coming true is <i>baked into</i> the rumor itself!<br>
As the saying goes, it's a self-fulfilling... rumor(?)...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As the saying goes , there 's no smoke without fire But it 's been smoking for 6 years .
Are you going to keep the firetruck stationed there the entire time ? Besides , the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop .
Wow ! It 's almost like the reason for the rumor not coming true is baked into the rumor itself !
As the saying goes , it 's a self-fulfilling.. .
rumor ( ? ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire

But it's been smoking for 6 years.
Are you going to keep the firetruck stationed there the entire time?Besides, the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop.
Wow! It's almost like the reason for the rumor not coming true is baked into the rumor itself!
As the saying goes, it's a self-fulfilling...
rumor(?)...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675517</id>
	<title>Soooo...</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1247496780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...as an iPhone user married to AT&amp;T, if I want one of these I have to sign up with Verizon as well? I thought polygamy was illegal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...as an iPhone user married to AT&amp;T , if I want one of these I have to sign up with Verizon as well ?
I thought polygamy was illegal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as an iPhone user married to AT&amp;T, if I want one of these I have to sign up with Verizon as well?
I thought polygamy was illegal?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683549</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Apple came up with an Iphone that had buttons, 3G, copy/paste, ability to run applications not just that Apple decide, video, ability to picture message with a wide range of phones, and cost under &pound;100, I'd switch in a flash. It's just such a shame that there aren't any phones other than the Iphone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple came up with an Iphone that had buttons , 3G , copy/paste , ability to run applications not just that Apple decide , video , ability to picture message with a wide range of phones , and cost under   100 , I 'd switch in a flash .
It 's just such a shame that there are n't any phones other than the Iphone : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple came up with an Iphone that had buttons, 3G, copy/paste, ability to run applications not just that Apple decide, video, ability to picture message with a wide range of phones, and cost under £100, I'd switch in a flash.
It's just such a shame that there aren't any phones other than the Iphone :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676929</id>
	<title>Price and Rumor</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1247502060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First thing's first.  $599 for anything from Apple is a virtual impossibility.  You can't buff that shine into something for less than $599, never mind add a bunch of electronics and usability into it.</p><p>Second thing, why not just make an iPhone with an enlargeable screen?  Wouldn't that be the killer product?  LCDs can be practically paper-thin...allow the iPhone's screen to expand to laptop-size.  Or better, allow a laptop screen to expand to monitor size so you can actually sit around one with your friends/colleagues at a patio/conference table.</p><p>Do I have to do all the thinking here, people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First thing 's first .
$ 599 for anything from Apple is a virtual impossibility .
You ca n't buff that shine into something for less than $ 599 , never mind add a bunch of electronics and usability into it.Second thing , why not just make an iPhone with an enlargeable screen ?
Would n't that be the killer product ?
LCDs can be practically paper-thin...allow the iPhone 's screen to expand to laptop-size .
Or better , allow a laptop screen to expand to monitor size so you can actually sit around one with your friends/colleagues at a patio/conference table.Do I have to do all the thinking here , people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thing's first.
$599 for anything from Apple is a virtual impossibility.
You can't buff that shine into something for less than $599, never mind add a bunch of electronics and usability into it.Second thing, why not just make an iPhone with an enlargeable screen?
Wouldn't that be the killer product?
LCDs can be practically paper-thin...allow the iPhone's screen to expand to laptop-size.
Or better, allow a laptop screen to expand to monitor size so you can actually sit around one with your friends/colleagues at a patio/conference table.Do I have to do all the thinking here, people!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675069</id>
	<title>More proprietary crap with great potential that</title>
	<author>swb311</author>
	<datestamp>1247494260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>will never be realized.<br> <br>

WHY OH APPLE OVERLORDS do you feel the need to cock-tease us with these wonderful little devices (like the iPhone) and then cock-block us into contracts, limited wifi usage, your set of pre-approved applications, etc. <br> <br> <br>


Apple, you used to be cool.<br> <br>

I'm done with your fascist ways, I'm buying Windoze!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>will never be realized .
WHY OH APPLE OVERLORDS do you feel the need to cock-tease us with these wonderful little devices ( like the iPhone ) and then cock-block us into contracts , limited wifi usage , your set of pre-approved applications , etc .
Apple , you used to be cool .
I 'm done with your fascist ways , I 'm buying Windoze !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will never be realized.
WHY OH APPLE OVERLORDS do you feel the need to cock-tease us with these wonderful little devices (like the iPhone) and then cock-block us into contracts, limited wifi usage, your set of pre-approved applications, etc.
Apple, you used to be cool.
I'm done with your fascist ways, I'm buying Windoze!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687677</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>speedtux</author>
	<datestamp>1247562060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?</i></p><p>Yes, why would people do that?  Why do they bother making Linux distributions and installing them on their Mac hardware if OS X is really everything you make it out to be? Why?</p><p>I'll tell you why: because they don't see OS X the way you do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware , and lots of application support , and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that does n't do the half of it... Why ? Yes , why would people do that ?
Why do they bother making Linux distributions and installing them on their Mac hardware if OS X is really everything you make it out to be ?
Why ? I 'll tell you why : because they do n't see OS X the way you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?Yes, why would people do that?
Why do they bother making Linux distributions and installing them on their Mac hardware if OS X is really everything you make it out to be?
Why?I'll tell you why: because they don't see OS X the way you do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011</id>
	<title>iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that:</p><p>kept the same screen size</p><p>had robust Exchange connectivity</p><p>had an integrated GPS</p><p>had decent battery life</p><p>I'd switch back to Verizon, especially if it was a world phone.  I'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that : kept the same screen sizehad robust Exchange connectivityhad an integrated GPShad decent battery lifeI 'd switch back to Verizon , especially if it was a world phone .
I 'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that:kept the same screen sizehad robust Exchange connectivityhad an integrated GPShad decent battery lifeI'd switch back to Verizon, especially if it was a world phone.
I'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677507</id>
	<title>What to expect? Easy</title>
	<author>Em Ellel</author>
	<datestamp>1247504160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would expect Apple fans to proclaim it to be the most innovative and awesome thing ever, even though there is nothing new in the concept and it will probably be more restrictive in what you can do with it than a rented etch-a-sketch. Still, I would expect it to be a raging success, as no other company has as rabid a fan-base that will buy anything Apple throws at them without complaining and will even infect others who should know better to buy them as well. Hell, not proud of it, but I own two ipods, iPhone and a Mac, and I'll probably buy one of theses because while there is nothing new here, no one has been able to successfully produce anything like it on mass scale (again, see rabid fan-base), which I expect will pretty much make them the only game in town. Funny how that turns out.</p><p>I am still holding out hope for the CrunchPad. C'mon, the netbooks are now under $200, touchscreen film for that size is about $20 - why has not one of the netbook manufacturers thought of combining the two (there are plenty of hacks online for this) into a tablet only case (not those annoying and expensive turn and flip things?). I bet they just do not think they can sell enough of those. Watch Apple prove them wrong.</p><p>-Em</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would expect Apple fans to proclaim it to be the most innovative and awesome thing ever , even though there is nothing new in the concept and it will probably be more restrictive in what you can do with it than a rented etch-a-sketch .
Still , I would expect it to be a raging success , as no other company has as rabid a fan-base that will buy anything Apple throws at them without complaining and will even infect others who should know better to buy them as well .
Hell , not proud of it , but I own two ipods , iPhone and a Mac , and I 'll probably buy one of theses because while there is nothing new here , no one has been able to successfully produce anything like it on mass scale ( again , see rabid fan-base ) , which I expect will pretty much make them the only game in town .
Funny how that turns out.I am still holding out hope for the CrunchPad .
C'mon , the netbooks are now under $ 200 , touchscreen film for that size is about $ 20 - why has not one of the netbook manufacturers thought of combining the two ( there are plenty of hacks online for this ) into a tablet only case ( not those annoying and expensive turn and flip things ? ) .
I bet they just do not think they can sell enough of those .
Watch Apple prove them wrong.-Em</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would expect Apple fans to proclaim it to be the most innovative and awesome thing ever, even though there is nothing new in the concept and it will probably be more restrictive in what you can do with it than a rented etch-a-sketch.
Still, I would expect it to be a raging success, as no other company has as rabid a fan-base that will buy anything Apple throws at them without complaining and will even infect others who should know better to buy them as well.
Hell, not proud of it, but I own two ipods, iPhone and a Mac, and I'll probably buy one of theses because while there is nothing new here, no one has been able to successfully produce anything like it on mass scale (again, see rabid fan-base), which I expect will pretty much make them the only game in town.
Funny how that turns out.I am still holding out hope for the CrunchPad.
C'mon, the netbooks are now under $200, touchscreen film for that size is about $20 - why has not one of the netbook manufacturers thought of combining the two (there are plenty of hacks online for this) into a tablet only case (not those annoying and expensive turn and flip things?).
I bet they just do not think they can sell enough of those.
Watch Apple prove them wrong.-Em</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681179</id>
	<title>Re:Ya... I'm thinking not...</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1247516880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market, because there really isn't one.</p></div><p>Other than the <a href="http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=64334" title="vgchartz.com">13 million iPod Touches</a> [vgchartz.com], I'd agree with you.  Seriously, if the iPhone is a phone + PDA, and you remove the phone...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market , because there really is n't one.Other than the 13 million iPod Touches [ vgchartz.com ] , I 'd agree with you .
Seriously , if the iPhone is a phone + PDA , and you remove the phone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market, because there really isn't one.Other than the 13 million iPod Touches [vgchartz.com], I'd agree with you.
Seriously, if the iPhone is a phone + PDA, and you remove the phone...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675527</id>
	<title>Re:Hey! Let's Just make Shit up!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's substantiated by the fact that Apple has a deal on 10" touchscreens, by the claims made by Apple concerning netbooks and the fact Apple had a job offer for a handwriting recognition expert.

</p><p>When you put all of these together it seems reasonable to expect a 10" touchscreen tablet appear. May I go out on a limb and ask you if you've RTFA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's substantiated by the fact that Apple has a deal on 10 " touchscreens , by the claims made by Apple concerning netbooks and the fact Apple had a job offer for a handwriting recognition expert .
When you put all of these together it seems reasonable to expect a 10 " touchscreen tablet appear .
May I go out on a limb and ask you if you 've RTFA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's substantiated by the fact that Apple has a deal on 10" touchscreens, by the claims made by Apple concerning netbooks and the fact Apple had a job offer for a handwriting recognition expert.
When you put all of these together it seems reasonable to expect a 10" touchscreen tablet appear.
May I go out on a limb and ask you if you've RTFA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001</id>
	<title>I know this is hearsay but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My gf works in the publishing industry and her superiors have said they've seen the prototypes for an Apple tablet/e-Reader... Something like this IS coming... It's only a matter of when.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My gf works in the publishing industry and her superiors have said they 've seen the prototypes for an Apple tablet/e-Reader... Something like this IS coming... It 's only a matter of when .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My gf works in the publishing industry and her superiors have said they've seen the prototypes for an Apple tablet/e-Reader... Something like this IS coming... It's only a matter of when.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676125</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1247499360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Why on earth would you hack it to run linux?</p><p>The same reason you would put Linux on a mini.</p><p>MacOS is a pig and it's performance kind of sucks.<br>Driver support is inferior.<br>Support for random data formats is inferior.<br>A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it's worth.<br>The "special app" doesn't help manage for the limitations of the target device.</p><p>The iPhone is a spiffy little appliance.</p><p>MacOS is more annoying than "superior" in it's distinctiveness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Why on earth would you hack it to run linux ? The same reason you would put Linux on a mini.MacOS is a pig and it 's performance kind of sucks.Driver support is inferior.Support for random data formats is inferior.A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it 's worth.The " special app " does n't help manage for the limitations of the target device.The iPhone is a spiffy little appliance.MacOS is more annoying than " superior " in it 's distinctiveness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Why on earth would you hack it to run linux?The same reason you would put Linux on a mini.MacOS is a pig and it's performance kind of sucks.Driver support is inferior.Support for random data formats is inferior.A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it's worth.The "special app" doesn't help manage for the limitations of the target device.The iPhone is a spiffy little appliance.MacOS is more annoying than "superior" in it's distinctiveness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247494320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux, this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux , this thing ( assuming it existed ) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware , and lots of application support , and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that does n't do the half of it... Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux, this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687573</id>
	<title>Re:Hey! Let's Just make Shit up!</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1247603940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>(sigh) I love talking tech as much as anyone, but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality?</i></p><p>In a way I agree, but I also like to fantasize. In the case of a Mac tablet though there is no fantasy.  The <a href="http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook" title="axiotron.com">ModBook</a> [axiotron.com] is a MacBook that's been modified into a Mac tablet.  It has been available for years.  A question I've had all these years is why Apple hasn't bought the company that makes the ModBook or released one itself.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( sigh ) I love talking tech as much as anyone , but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality ? In a way I agree , but I also like to fantasize .
In the case of a Mac tablet though there is no fantasy .
The ModBook [ axiotron.com ] is a MacBook that 's been modified into a Mac tablet .
It has been available for years .
A question I 've had all these years is why Apple has n't bought the company that makes the ModBook or released one itself .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(sigh) I love talking tech as much as anyone, but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality?In a way I agree, but I also like to fantasize.
In the case of a Mac tablet though there is no fantasy.
The ModBook [axiotron.com] is a MacBook that's been modified into a Mac tablet.
It has been available for years.
A question I've had all these years is why Apple hasn't bought the company that makes the ModBook or released one itself.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676713</id>
	<title>Re:Price point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247501400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When a review of an imaginary Apple doesn't sound stupid enough, state a price less then $999 and suddenly you sound like a moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When a review of an imaginary Apple does n't sound stupid enough , state a price less then $ 999 and suddenly you sound like a moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When a review of an imaginary Apple doesn't sound stupid enough, state a price less then $999 and suddenly you sound like a moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675365</id>
	<title>Mac Tablet History</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1247495940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[ credits to Rik Myslewski at the register]:</p><p>* eWEEK, November 2002, "Waiting for the Mac Tablet":<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "It's my strong belief - let's call it a hunch - that prototype Mac tablets are already making the rounds among select developers."<br>* Engadget, May 2005, "Apple's patented the Tablet Mac"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "[Tablet-Mac rumors] became substantiated today when Apple's secret plans for a tablet PC were<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... revealed.<br>* CutMeLoose.com, May 2005, "Apple Tablet PC sightings"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "I have no less than 5 sources saying an Apple Tablet announcement is due soon."<br>* Cnet UK, November 2007, "Apple Tablet PC is real, says Asus"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "You can bet your bottom dollar [a tablet Mac] is being built as you read this."<br>* Mac|Life, January 2008, "The Apple Tablet Mac: 8 Reasons It's Gonna Happen"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "The tablet rumor has been around for the last couple years, but now, all the ducks are in a row."<br>* ZDNet, May 2008, "Tablet Mac coming this fall"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "A little birdy tells me that Apple will announce a 12 or 13-inch tablet in the fall of this year."<br>* Wired, July 2008, "Apple to Launch MacBook Touch?"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "The blogosphere is aflutter with rumors of a touchscreen Mac tablet."<br>* Industry Standard, December 2008, "Apple announces Mac tablet at Macworld 2009?"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Could this 6 year old rumor finally come true?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ credits to Rik Myslewski at the register ] : * eWEEK , November 2002 , " Waiting for the Mac Tablet " :                     " It 's my strong belief - let 's call it a hunch - that prototype Mac tablets are already making the rounds among select developers .
" * Engadget , May 2005 , " Apple 's patented the Tablet Mac "                     " [ Tablet-Mac rumors ] became substantiated today when Apple 's secret plans for a tablet PC were .. .
revealed. * CutMeLoose.com , May 2005 , " Apple Tablet PC sightings "                     " I have no less than 5 sources saying an Apple Tablet announcement is due soon .
" * Cnet UK , November 2007 , " Apple Tablet PC is real , says Asus "                     " You can bet your bottom dollar [ a tablet Mac ] is being built as you read this .
" * Mac | Life , January 2008 , " The Apple Tablet Mac : 8 Reasons It 's Gon na Happen "                     " The tablet rumor has been around for the last couple years , but now , all the ducks are in a row .
" * ZDNet , May 2008 , " Tablet Mac coming this fall "                     " A little birdy tells me that Apple will announce a 12 or 13-inch tablet in the fall of this year .
" * Wired , July 2008 , " Apple to Launch MacBook Touch ?
"                     " The blogosphere is aflutter with rumors of a touchscreen Mac tablet .
" * Industry Standard , December 2008 , " Apple announces Mac tablet at Macworld 2009 ?
"                     " Could this 6 year old rumor finally come true ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[ credits to Rik Myslewski at the register]:* eWEEK, November 2002, "Waiting for the Mac Tablet":
                    "It's my strong belief - let's call it a hunch - that prototype Mac tablets are already making the rounds among select developers.
"* Engadget, May 2005, "Apple's patented the Tablet Mac"
                    "[Tablet-Mac rumors] became substantiated today when Apple's secret plans for a tablet PC were ...
revealed.* CutMeLoose.com, May 2005, "Apple Tablet PC sightings"
                    "I have no less than 5 sources saying an Apple Tablet announcement is due soon.
"* Cnet UK, November 2007, "Apple Tablet PC is real, says Asus"
                    "You can bet your bottom dollar [a tablet Mac] is being built as you read this.
"* Mac|Life, January 2008, "The Apple Tablet Mac: 8 Reasons It's Gonna Happen"
                    "The tablet rumor has been around for the last couple years, but now, all the ducks are in a row.
"* ZDNet, May 2008, "Tablet Mac coming this fall"
                    "A little birdy tells me that Apple will announce a 12 or 13-inch tablet in the fall of this year.
"* Wired, July 2008, "Apple to Launch MacBook Touch?
"
                    "The blogosphere is aflutter with rumors of a touchscreen Mac tablet.
"* Industry Standard, December 2008, "Apple announces Mac tablet at Macworld 2009?
"
                    "Could this 6 year old rumor finally come true?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675189</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Because Apple will adopt touch screen technology on its netbooks, Apple will not target low-end consumers, avoiding direct competition with Acer, Asus, as well as their less-than-500-dollars netbooks. Apple's netbook (or a "tablet" as many call it,) will probably be sold at around $800 USD each."</p><p>OP is clueless to apple's business strategies and Apple is much more likely to subsidize through AT&amp;T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Because Apple will adopt touch screen technology on its netbooks , Apple will not target low-end consumers , avoiding direct competition with Acer , Asus , as well as their less-than-500-dollars netbooks .
Apple 's netbook ( or a " tablet " as many call it , ) will probably be sold at around $ 800 USD each .
" OP is clueless to apple 's business strategies and Apple is much more likely to subsidize through AT&amp;T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Because Apple will adopt touch screen technology on its netbooks, Apple will not target low-end consumers, avoiding direct competition with Acer, Asus, as well as their less-than-500-dollars netbooks.
Apple's netbook (or a "tablet" as many call it,) will probably be sold at around $800 USD each.
"OP is clueless to apple's business strategies and Apple is much more likely to subsidize through AT&amp;T</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677627</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1247504520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one because I am used to Linux and KDE4 is the first DE (including Windows and OS X) that I actually like. I am also against some practices from Apple and Microsoft that I decided to boycott wherever possible. Oh and 'killerapps' (read: apps I prefer) like AmaroK, DigiKam and Kdenlive (yes Linux has an awesome video editor, shocked?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P) that do not work that well on Mac OS X yet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one because I am used to Linux and KDE4 is the first DE ( including Windows and OS X ) that I actually like .
I am also against some practices from Apple and Microsoft that I decided to boycott wherever possible .
Oh and 'killerapps ' ( read : apps I prefer ) like AmaroK , DigiKam and Kdenlive ( yes Linux has an awesome video editor , shocked ?
; ) : P ) that do not work that well on Mac OS X yet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one because I am used to Linux and KDE4 is the first DE (including Windows and OS X) that I actually like.
I am also against some practices from Apple and Microsoft that I decided to boycott wherever possible.
Oh and 'killerapps' (read: apps I prefer) like AmaroK, DigiKam and Kdenlive (yes Linux has an awesome video editor, shocked?
;) :P) that do not work that well on Mac OS X yet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677703</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>tattood</author>
	<datestamp>1247504880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Knowing Apple, the RAM modules are not going to be standard memory cards that can be "ripped" out, but integrated into the motherboard.  Good luck with that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing Apple , the RAM modules are not going to be standard memory cards that can be " ripped " out , but integrated into the motherboard .
Good luck with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing Apple, the RAM modules are not going to be standard memory cards that can be "ripped" out, but integrated into the motherboard.
Good luck with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683181</id>
	<title>Where's the bloody multi-touch already?!?!?!?!?!</title>
	<author>joshamania</author>
	<datestamp>1247481900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stylus?!?  Are you (*&amp;#)(*&amp;)R**&amp;)(^!!! kidding me?</p><p>Am I the only person in the world that is disgusted by the fact that the first and so far *only* consumer device that has a multi-touch interface also has a 3" screen?  When the iPhone came out I figured that it would only be a matter of time before Apple announced a multi-touch MacBook and anything less than $5000 and I'm soooo buying it....but...no.  Multi-touch on the iPhone is retarded.  You can use all of one real multi-touch gesture on it, the zoom, and that could have been easily accomplished with no degrading usability in a single-touch gesture or a button.  For multi-touch to really affect how we use a computer, we gotta have some real estate!  Give me multi-touch on a 17" screen!  NOW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stylus ? ! ?
Are you ( * &amp; # ) ( * &amp; ) R * * &amp; ) ( ^ ! ! !
kidding me ? Am I the only person in the world that is disgusted by the fact that the first and so far * only * consumer device that has a multi-touch interface also has a 3 " screen ?
When the iPhone came out I figured that it would only be a matter of time before Apple announced a multi-touch MacBook and anything less than $ 5000 and I 'm soooo buying it....but...no .
Multi-touch on the iPhone is retarded .
You can use all of one real multi-touch gesture on it , the zoom , and that could have been easily accomplished with no degrading usability in a single-touch gesture or a button .
For multi-touch to really affect how we use a computer , we got ta have some real estate !
Give me multi-touch on a 17 " screen !
NOW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stylus?!?
Are you (*&amp;#)(*&amp;)R**&amp;)(^!!!
kidding me?Am I the only person in the world that is disgusted by the fact that the first and so far *only* consumer device that has a multi-touch interface also has a 3" screen?
When the iPhone came out I figured that it would only be a matter of time before Apple announced a multi-touch MacBook and anything less than $5000 and I'm soooo buying it....but...no.
Multi-touch on the iPhone is retarded.
You can use all of one real multi-touch gesture on it, the zoom, and that could have been easily accomplished with no degrading usability in a single-touch gesture or a button.
For multi-touch to really affect how we use a computer, we gotta have some real estate!
Give me multi-touch on a 17" screen!
NOW!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675549</id>
	<title>A Data plan?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247496900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember when computers didn't have monthly data plans? I would rather save $ and just mooch off free wi-fi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember when computers did n't have monthly data plans ?
I would rather save $ and just mooch off free wi-fi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember when computers didn't have monthly data plans?
I would rather save $ and just mooch off free wi-fi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675295</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>profplump</author>
	<datestamp>1247495640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you're half-trolling, since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass. And I can certainly see why you're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are. But when you say "Had robust Exchange connectivity" wouldn't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange "Had robust IMAP connectivity"? We have a widely-used, well-documented, long-established, royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access, which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it's Exchange that doesn't speak email.</p><p>If you're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry (any of them) and their lack of an IMAP client, or the ability to monitor more than one mail account, or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing, inbox-only "IMAP" service. I know they're "helping" by providing push email, and it's not a terrible option for some people, but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts, and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification doesn't seem like a big problem for most uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you 're half-trolling , since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass .
And I can certainly see why you 're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are .
But when you say " Had robust Exchange connectivity " would n't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange " Had robust IMAP connectivity " ?
We have a widely-used , well-documented , long-established , royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access , which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it 's Exchange that does n't speak email.If you 're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry ( any of them ) and their lack of an IMAP client , or the ability to monitor more than one mail account , or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing , inbox-only " IMAP " service .
I know they 're " helping " by providing push email , and it 's not a terrible option for some people , but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts , and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification does n't seem like a big problem for most uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you're half-trolling, since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass.
And I can certainly see why you're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are.
But when you say "Had robust Exchange connectivity" wouldn't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange "Had robust IMAP connectivity"?
We have a widely-used, well-documented, long-established, royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access, which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it's Exchange that doesn't speak email.If you're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry (any of them) and their lack of an IMAP client, or the ability to monitor more than one mail account, or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing, inbox-only "IMAP" service.
I know they're "helping" by providing push email, and it's not a terrible option for some people, but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts, and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification doesn't seem like a big problem for most uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645</id>
	<title>Re:Mac Tablet History</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1247497380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire. Just look at the rumours about the Google OS.

</p><p>Besides, the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the saying goes , there 's no smoke without fire .
Just look at the rumours about the Google OS .
Besides , the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire.
Just look at the rumours about the Google OS.
Besides, the Apple tablet in question is rumoured to have taken an unusual time to develop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675841</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>morgauxo</author>
	<datestamp>1247498220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because Apple anything tends to be proprietary, locked down garbage which Apple does not relinquish control of even after you pay them for it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because Apple anything tends to be proprietary , locked down garbage which Apple does not relinquish control of even after you pay them for it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because Apple anything tends to be proprietary, locked down garbage which Apple does not relinquish control of even after you pay them for it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28688821</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1247575140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"My post below outlines what this product might actually do, what innovations it will have and what some of its challenges are..."</i> <p>

Which means "I'm just guessing and don't know any more than you do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" My post below outlines what this product might actually do , what innovations it will have and what some of its challenges are... " Which means " I 'm just guessing and do n't know any more than you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"My post below outlines what this product might actually do, what innovations it will have and what some of its challenges are..." 

Which means "I'm just guessing and don't know any more than you do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684489</id>
	<title>Followed by the ZunePad by Microsoft</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1247489400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and then the ChromePad by Google and the LinPad by Linux companies.</p><p>Might as well cover all the bases here.</p><p>Let me see how this plays out for a business plan.</p><p>#1 Create BS story about Apple technology to make the Slashdot front page.</p><p>#2 ?</p><p>#3 Profit!</p><p>It seems to follow an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnomes\_(South\_Park)" title="wikipedia.org">Underpants Gnomes</a> [wikipedia.org] Business Model there.</p><p>If Apple already has a deal with AT&amp;T for the iPhone, why make a deal with Verizon for the MacPad? It seems like Apple and AT&amp;T can bundle iPhone and MacPad service in one bill to save the customer money.</p><p>Why would Apple make a MacPad that costs less than a MacBook with almost the same technology? Why not lower the price of a MacBook and then include a mobile wireless modem in it with a wireless plan to cut down on the costs because buying the MacBook bundle will lower the cost of the MacBook and then make up the difference via the Internet service plan.</p><p>Also what if Apple calls it the iPad or something else?</p><p>Also what if Apple bought 10 inch screens for a 10 inch MacBook instead of a MacPad?</p><p>Also what if Apple hired a handwriting expert to improve the Mac OSX Inkwell program instead of creating a MacPad?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and then the ChromePad by Google and the LinPad by Linux companies.Might as well cover all the bases here.Let me see how this plays out for a business plan. # 1 Create BS story about Apple technology to make the Slashdot front page. # 2 ? # 3 Profit ! It seems to follow an Underpants Gnomes [ wikipedia.org ] Business Model there.If Apple already has a deal with AT&amp;T for the iPhone , why make a deal with Verizon for the MacPad ?
It seems like Apple and AT&amp;T can bundle iPhone and MacPad service in one bill to save the customer money.Why would Apple make a MacPad that costs less than a MacBook with almost the same technology ?
Why not lower the price of a MacBook and then include a mobile wireless modem in it with a wireless plan to cut down on the costs because buying the MacBook bundle will lower the cost of the MacBook and then make up the difference via the Internet service plan.Also what if Apple calls it the iPad or something else ? Also what if Apple bought 10 inch screens for a 10 inch MacBook instead of a MacPad ? Also what if Apple hired a handwriting expert to improve the Mac OSX Inkwell program instead of creating a MacPad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and then the ChromePad by Google and the LinPad by Linux companies.Might as well cover all the bases here.Let me see how this plays out for a business plan.#1 Create BS story about Apple technology to make the Slashdot front page.#2 ?#3 Profit!It seems to follow an Underpants Gnomes [wikipedia.org] Business Model there.If Apple already has a deal with AT&amp;T for the iPhone, why make a deal with Verizon for the MacPad?
It seems like Apple and AT&amp;T can bundle iPhone and MacPad service in one bill to save the customer money.Why would Apple make a MacPad that costs less than a MacBook with almost the same technology?
Why not lower the price of a MacBook and then include a mobile wireless modem in it with a wireless plan to cut down on the costs because buying the MacBook bundle will lower the cost of the MacBook and then make up the difference via the Internet service plan.Also what if Apple calls it the iPad or something else?Also what if Apple bought 10 inch screens for a 10 inch MacBook instead of a MacPad?Also what if Apple hired a handwriting expert to improve the Mac OSX Inkwell program instead of creating a MacPad?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675099</id>
	<title>What To Expect From Apple's Rumored MacPad</title>
	<author>dvh.tosomja</author>
	<datestamp>1247494500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; What To Expect From Apple's Rumored MacPad</p><p>Rumors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; What To Expect From Apple 's Rumored MacPadRumors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; What To Expect From Apple's Rumored MacPadRumors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675039</id>
	<title>Do I have to do everything round here?</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1247494140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple\_introduces\_revolutionary" title="theonion.com">http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple\_introduces\_revolutionary</a> [theonion.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.theonion.com/content/video/apple \ _introduces \ _revolutionary [ theonion.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple\_introduces\_revolutionary [theonion.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681143</id>
	<title>It's a mac.</title>
	<author>Nekomusume</author>
	<datestamp>1247516760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will cost far too much, do not nearly enough, be "stylish" to some and "boring" to others... And even should 1 in 10 of them explode, the serious mac fans will drool over them and spend far too many hours trying to convince everybody else that they are subhuman trash for not taking apple marketing as the holy gospel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will cost far too much , do not nearly enough , be " stylish " to some and " boring " to others... And even should 1 in 10 of them explode , the serious mac fans will drool over them and spend far too many hours trying to convince everybody else that they are subhuman trash for not taking apple marketing as the holy gospel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will cost far too much, do not nearly enough, be "stylish" to some and "boring" to others... And even should 1 in 10 of them explode, the serious mac fans will drool over them and spend far too many hours trying to convince everybody else that they are subhuman trash for not taking apple marketing as the holy gospel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28678151</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1247506140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered.</p></div><p>Well that and $600 is a lot to pay for a 128GB SSD.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered.Well that and $ 600 is a lot to pay for a 128GB SSD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered.Well that and $600 is a lot to pay for a 128GB SSD.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682487</id>
	<title>Re:Apparent RAM upgrade :)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247479020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps he doesn't know the difference between RAM and flash?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he does n't know the difference between RAM and flash ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he doesn't know the difference between RAM and flash?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675187</id>
	<title>Ya... I'm thinking not...</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1247495160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This "let's make shit up and pretend like it is real," stuff annoys me. There is no basis to any of this.</p><p>What's more, I find it rather unlikely Apple is going to try for a PDA type device. Why? As mentioned, the iPhone. If you do some shopping around these days you discover that dedicated PDAs, as in devices that aren't part of a phone, are rather rare. You can get them, of course, but there aren't so many out there. Why's that? Well most people don't want to carry another device with them. They are all about minimal amount of crap to carry around.</p><p>Phone PDAs, well those are all the rage. These days it seems that providers have almost as many smart phones as normal phones. People love the idea. You get all your PDA features, in a slightly larger phone. Only one device to carry.</p><p>I know it is certianly that way for me. A number of years ago our boss got us PDAs. There was some deal that he was able to get them cheap so he figured "Why not?" Well, they never really got used. Even he wasn't all that keen on carrying an extra device. However we now all have smartphones, and we all love them. Ya they are a little larger than a plain cell, but not much and you get all the PDA features AND all the phone features.</p><p>So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market, because there really isn't one. They already are doing great in the smartphone market, that is probably where they'll stay. I just don't see PDAs making a resurgence, ever.</p><p>Now they might try a tablet PC or something, there is a small market for those. However it won't be a $500 device, that's for sure. Tablet PCs are, as the name implies, PCs you can write on as in full featured laptop hardware. Means from Apple you are talking $1000+.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This " let 's make shit up and pretend like it is real , " stuff annoys me .
There is no basis to any of this.What 's more , I find it rather unlikely Apple is going to try for a PDA type device .
Why ? As mentioned , the iPhone .
If you do some shopping around these days you discover that dedicated PDAs , as in devices that are n't part of a phone , are rather rare .
You can get them , of course , but there are n't so many out there .
Why 's that ?
Well most people do n't want to carry another device with them .
They are all about minimal amount of crap to carry around.Phone PDAs , well those are all the rage .
These days it seems that providers have almost as many smart phones as normal phones .
People love the idea .
You get all your PDA features , in a slightly larger phone .
Only one device to carry.I know it is certianly that way for me .
A number of years ago our boss got us PDAs .
There was some deal that he was able to get them cheap so he figured " Why not ?
" Well , they never really got used .
Even he was n't all that keen on carrying an extra device .
However we now all have smartphones , and we all love them .
Ya they are a little larger than a plain cell , but not much and you get all the PDA features AND all the phone features.So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market , because there really is n't one .
They already are doing great in the smartphone market , that is probably where they 'll stay .
I just do n't see PDAs making a resurgence , ever.Now they might try a tablet PC or something , there is a small market for those .
However it wo n't be a $ 500 device , that 's for sure .
Tablet PCs are , as the name implies , PCs you can write on as in full featured laptop hardware .
Means from Apple you are talking $ 1000 + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This "let's make shit up and pretend like it is real," stuff annoys me.
There is no basis to any of this.What's more, I find it rather unlikely Apple is going to try for a PDA type device.
Why? As mentioned, the iPhone.
If you do some shopping around these days you discover that dedicated PDAs, as in devices that aren't part of a phone, are rather rare.
You can get them, of course, but there aren't so many out there.
Why's that?
Well most people don't want to carry another device with them.
They are all about minimal amount of crap to carry around.Phone PDAs, well those are all the rage.
These days it seems that providers have almost as many smart phones as normal phones.
People love the idea.
You get all your PDA features, in a slightly larger phone.
Only one device to carry.I know it is certianly that way for me.
A number of years ago our boss got us PDAs.
There was some deal that he was able to get them cheap so he figured "Why not?
" Well, they never really got used.
Even he wasn't all that keen on carrying an extra device.
However we now all have smartphones, and we all love them.
Ya they are a little larger than a plain cell, but not much and you get all the PDA features AND all the phone features.So it would be rather retarded for Apple to try and enter the PDA market, because there really isn't one.
They already are doing great in the smartphone market, that is probably where they'll stay.
I just don't see PDAs making a resurgence, ever.Now they might try a tablet PC or something, there is a small market for those.
However it won't be a $500 device, that's for sure.
Tablet PCs are, as the name implies, PCs you can write on as in full featured laptop hardware.
Means from Apple you are talking $1000+.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687973</id>
	<title>Haskin? Oh, I just read Raskin</title>
	<author>firefarter</author>
	<datestamp>1247565360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a moment there I almost thought Raskin came back from the grave to criticize the iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a moment there I almost thought Raskin came back from the grave to criticize the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a moment there I almost thought Raskin came back from the grave to criticize the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675737</id>
	<title>Re:WTF.</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247497740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With this device, sunshine really will shine out of the owners' backside. Only without the whole "ring of fire" effect you'd expect from such an occurance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With this device , sunshine really will shine out of the owners ' backside .
Only without the whole " ring of fire " effect you 'd expect from such an occurance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With this device, sunshine really will shine out of the owners' backside.
Only without the whole "ring of fire" effect you'd expect from such an occurance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683521</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is hearsay but...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247483520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I know this is hearsay, but my girlfriend's best friend's tennis partner works next door to someone in the gaming industry, who says he's heard rumours of a new development in the popular <i>Duke Nukem</i> franchise.</p><p>Something like this IS coming... It's only a matter of when.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I know this is hearsay , but my girlfriend 's best friend 's tennis partner works next door to someone in the gaming industry , who says he 's heard rumours of a new development in the popular Duke Nukem franchise.Something like this IS coming... It 's only a matter of when .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I know this is hearsay, but my girlfriend's best friend's tennis partner works next door to someone in the gaming industry, who says he's heard rumours of a new development in the popular Duke Nukem franchise.Something like this IS coming... It's only a matter of when.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682043</id>
	<title>Beating the dead meme horse</title>
	<author>XLR8DST8</author>
	<datestamp>1247477100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

go ahead.. mod me down..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>imagine a Beowulf cluster of these !
go ahead.. mod me down.. : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!
go ahead.. mod me down.. :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041</id>
	<title>Apparent RAM upgrade :)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247494140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know, I know, it's just a (repeated) typo. But to consistently assign products 64-128 <b>GB</b> of RAM...it doesn't really inspire confidence in me as to the accuracy of the rest of the article...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , I know , it 's just a ( repeated ) typo .
But to consistently assign products 64-128 GB of RAM...it does n't really inspire confidence in me as to the accuracy of the rest of the article.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, I know, it's just a (repeated) typo.
But to consistently assign products 64-128 GB of RAM...it doesn't really inspire confidence in me as to the accuracy of the rest of the article...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687387</id>
	<title>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux?</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1247602080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>MacOS is a pig and it's performance kind of sucks.</i></p><p>Where's your evidence? I'll make it easy and ask for evidence not proof.</p><p><i>Driver support is inferior.</i></p><p>Again, do you have evidence?  I have a number of USB and Firewire devices attached to my Mac and I have not had a problem with any of them.  However there are known issues with installing and using Ubuntu on my MacBook Pro.  I know because I've been researching how to install it on my Mac.</p><p><i>Support for random data formats is inferior.</i></p><p>What?</p><p><i>A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it's worth.</i></p><p>That depends but it can happen on any computer running any OS.  It is not exclusive to Macs running OS X.  Heck there are proprietary formats that will not play legally on Linux.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon\_Lech\_Johansen" title="wikipedia.org">Jon Lech Johansen</a> [wikipedia.org] raised a stink when he released <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS" title="wikipedia.org">DeCSS</a> [wikipedia.org] so Linux PCs could play movie DVDs.</p><p>Almost every thing you said was FUD.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MacOS is a pig and it 's performance kind of sucks.Where 's your evidence ?
I 'll make it easy and ask for evidence not proof.Driver support is inferior.Again , do you have evidence ?
I have a number of USB and Firewire devices attached to my Mac and I have not had a problem with any of them .
However there are known issues with installing and using Ubuntu on my MacBook Pro .
I know because I 've been researching how to install it on my Mac.Support for random data formats is inferior.What ? A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it 's worth.That depends but it can happen on any computer running any OS .
It is not exclusive to Macs running OS X. Heck there are proprietary formats that will not play legally on Linux .
Jon Lech Johansen [ wikipedia.org ] raised a stink when he released DeCSS [ wikipedia.org ] so Linux PCs could play movie DVDs.Almost every thing you said was FUD .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MacOS is a pig and it's performance kind of sucks.Where's your evidence?
I'll make it easy and ask for evidence not proof.Driver support is inferior.Again, do you have evidence?
I have a number of USB and Firewire devices attached to my Mac and I have not had a problem with any of them.
However there are known issues with installing and using Ubuntu on my MacBook Pro.
I know because I've been researching how to install it on my Mac.Support for random data formats is inferior.What?A special app with exclusionary encryption is really more trouble than it's worth.That depends but it can happen on any computer running any OS.
It is not exclusive to Macs running OS X.  Heck there are proprietary formats that will not play legally on Linux.
Jon Lech Johansen [wikipedia.org] raised a stink when he released DeCSS [wikipedia.org] so Linux PCs could play movie DVDs.Almost every thing you said was FUD.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677527</id>
	<title>Chrome!</title>
	<author>alex4point0</author>
	<datestamp>1247504220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the universe !DIV/0 if/when Chrome is ported to it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the universe ! DIV/0 if/when Chrome is ported to it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the universe !DIV/0 if/when Chrome is ported to it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675999</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1247498820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think his point is that MacPorts covers 99\% of the Linux/Unix workalike software out there. Sure there is a lot of Linux only stuff - but typically only because the project is still in alpha and hasn't taken off yet. Given that, the drivers for the hardware on the device are not likley to be supported by Linux for some time after it's release... so you could 'own' the device by installing Linux but you'd be crippling it at the same time - for what purpose? Nothing but ego apparently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think his point is that MacPorts covers 99 \ % of the Linux/Unix workalike software out there .
Sure there is a lot of Linux only stuff - but typically only because the project is still in alpha and has n't taken off yet .
Given that , the drivers for the hardware on the device are not likley to be supported by Linux for some time after it 's release... so you could 'own ' the device by installing Linux but you 'd be crippling it at the same time - for what purpose ?
Nothing but ego apparently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think his point is that MacPorts covers 99\% of the Linux/Unix workalike software out there.
Sure there is a lot of Linux only stuff - but typically only because the project is still in alpha and hasn't taken off yet.
Given that, the drivers for the hardware on the device are not likley to be supported by Linux for some time after it's release... so you could 'own' the device by installing Linux but you'd be crippling it at the same time - for what purpose?
Nothing but ego apparently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676589</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is hearsay but...</title>
	<author>keithpreston</author>
	<datestamp>1247500980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work in the electronics industry and I have seen a lot of product way before their time.    I also know that probably over HALF of these product never see the light of day outside a conference room.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in the electronics industry and I have seen a lot of product way before their time .
I also know that probably over HALF of these product never see the light of day outside a conference room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in the electronics industry and I have seen a lot of product way before their time.
I also know that probably over HALF of these product never see the light of day outside a conference room.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899</id>
	<title>A review of product that is a rumor..</title>
	<author>synthesizerpatel</author>
	<datestamp>1247493300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really, the gem of this is referring to how previous rumor based stories that sided negative were wrong.. If you ignore the fact that the entire idea of this story is cobbled together from fairy dust and wishes.</p><p>I love my mac but.. in the words of William Shatner, get a life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , the gem of this is referring to how previous rumor based stories that sided negative were wrong.. If you ignore the fact that the entire idea of this story is cobbled together from fairy dust and wishes.I love my mac but.. in the words of William Shatner , get a life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, the gem of this is referring to how previous rumor based stories that sided negative were wrong.. If you ignore the fact that the entire idea of this story is cobbled together from fairy dust and wishes.I love my mac but.. in the words of William Shatner, get a life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675143</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1247494800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10, with a 10" diagonal color display, a $599 price point with a Verizon data plan, a stylus, note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes.</p> </div><p>

Ok, if this is all true (which I really haven't seen that any of it is) I can't see this being a success for Apple. First, $599 for it? Honestly you can get full laptops cheaper than that with data. Second, a stylus with all the multi-touch from the iPhone? Third Verizon(!)(?) they make AT&amp;T look great in comparison.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10 , with a 10 " diagonal color display , a $ 599 price point with a Verizon data plan , a stylus , note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes .
Ok , if this is all true ( which I really have n't seen that any of it is ) I ca n't see this being a success for Apple .
First , $ 599 for it ?
Honestly you can get full laptops cheaper than that with data .
Second , a stylus with all the multi-touch from the iPhone ?
Third Verizon ( ! ) ( ?
) they make AT&amp;T look great in comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The MacPad will arrive in fall '09 or Jan '10, with a 10" diagonal color display, a $599 price point with a Verizon data plan, a stylus, note taking application and handwriting recognition and an e-bookstore for iTunes.
Ok, if this is all true (which I really haven't seen that any of it is) I can't see this being a success for Apple.
First, $599 for it?
Honestly you can get full laptops cheaper than that with data.
Second, a stylus with all the multi-touch from the iPhone?
Third Verizon(!)(?
) they make AT&amp;T look great in comparison.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676145</id>
	<title>Death of the Macintosh</title>
	<author>with a 'c'</author>
	<datestamp>1247499420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Mac Pad has some possibility to be real simply because you would have to be blind to not see that the end of the Macintosh as a basic consumer device is coming. Anyone that went to WWDC can tell you the focus was entirely on iPhone OS.</p><p>The Macintosh will still be around as high end media creation devices and servers. Think of iPhone, Touch and potential MacPad or new consumer devices as media consumption devices. They will have basic editing ability (see iLife and iWork) but that's it. Who really needs a quad quad xenon to play MP3s and watch videos. Also look at the game market on iPhone OS. That's where the money is and that's where Apple is going.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Mac Pad has some possibility to be real simply because you would have to be blind to not see that the end of the Macintosh as a basic consumer device is coming .
Anyone that went to WWDC can tell you the focus was entirely on iPhone OS.The Macintosh will still be around as high end media creation devices and servers .
Think of iPhone , Touch and potential MacPad or new consumer devices as media consumption devices .
They will have basic editing ability ( see iLife and iWork ) but that 's it .
Who really needs a quad quad xenon to play MP3s and watch videos .
Also look at the game market on iPhone OS .
That 's where the money is and that 's where Apple is going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Mac Pad has some possibility to be real simply because you would have to be blind to not see that the end of the Macintosh as a basic consumer device is coming.
Anyone that went to WWDC can tell you the focus was entirely on iPhone OS.The Macintosh will still be around as high end media creation devices and servers.
Think of iPhone, Touch and potential MacPad or new consumer devices as media consumption devices.
They will have basic editing ability (see iLife and iWork) but that's it.
Who really needs a quad quad xenon to play MP3s and watch videos.
Also look at the game market on iPhone OS.
That's where the money is and that's where Apple is going.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675537</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>macs4all</author>
	<datestamp>1247496840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i say why because my app only runs on linux (for now).
i don't know anything about multiplatform stuff and wouldn't even try to (I'm a VB developer..)</p></div><p>
Apparently you know a LOT about cross-platform development already, because you're evidently developing in a WINDOWS-ONLY language (VB) but SOMEHOW getting your app to run in LINUX.
<br> <br>
Perhaps you were developing in <a href="http://www.linuxtoday.com/news\_story.php3?ltsn=2000-09-28-009-06-PR-SW" title="linuxtoday.com" rel="nofollow">THIS</a> [linuxtoday.com], or <a href="http://www.realsoftware.com/realbasic/" title="realsoftware.com" rel="nofollow">THIS</a> [realsoftware.com]?
<br> <br>
Idiot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i say why because my app only runs on linux ( for now ) .
i do n't know anything about multiplatform stuff and would n't even try to ( I 'm a VB developer.. ) Apparently you know a LOT about cross-platform development already , because you 're evidently developing in a WINDOWS-ONLY language ( VB ) but SOMEHOW getting your app to run in LINUX .
Perhaps you were developing in THIS [ linuxtoday.com ] , or THIS [ realsoftware.com ] ?
Idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i say why because my app only runs on linux (for now).
i don't know anything about multiplatform stuff and wouldn't even try to (I'm a VB developer..)
Apparently you know a LOT about cross-platform development already, because you're evidently developing in a WINDOWS-ONLY language (VB) but SOMEHOW getting your app to run in LINUX.
Perhaps you were developing in THIS [linuxtoday.com], or THIS [realsoftware.com]?
Idiot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28679219</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247509680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe. They don't solder it to the laptops, but then again I don't see apple going out of their way to make their hardware customizable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe .
They do n't solder it to the laptops , but then again I do n't see apple going out of their way to make their hardware customizable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe.
They don't solder it to the laptops, but then again I don't see apple going out of their way to make their hardware customizable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677657</id>
	<title>10 inch display?</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1247504640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do wonder about this. Microsoft seems determined to try to destroy the 12 inch netbook market, but the fact that they are trying to do that shows that the market wants 12 inch screens. Apple has an opportunity. A 12 inch screen is not far off US letter size, but also the additional surface area allows the incorporation of a much bigger battery and passive cooling. The Macbook Air has a screen 1 inch larger than the mainstream thin and light notebooks, and the extra space would prevent any cannibalisation of the Apple handheld markets. The Macbook Air also hasn't been very successful - too many compromises. A replacement which was smaller, lighter, cheaper and had working handwriting recognition (and perhaps a good onscreen keyboard) in a portrait format would be perhaps sufficiently different from the mainstream, while being genuinely useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do wonder about this .
Microsoft seems determined to try to destroy the 12 inch netbook market , but the fact that they are trying to do that shows that the market wants 12 inch screens .
Apple has an opportunity .
A 12 inch screen is not far off US letter size , but also the additional surface area allows the incorporation of a much bigger battery and passive cooling .
The Macbook Air has a screen 1 inch larger than the mainstream thin and light notebooks , and the extra space would prevent any cannibalisation of the Apple handheld markets .
The Macbook Air also has n't been very successful - too many compromises .
A replacement which was smaller , lighter , cheaper and had working handwriting recognition ( and perhaps a good onscreen keyboard ) in a portrait format would be perhaps sufficiently different from the mainstream , while being genuinely useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do wonder about this.
Microsoft seems determined to try to destroy the 12 inch netbook market, but the fact that they are trying to do that shows that the market wants 12 inch screens.
Apple has an opportunity.
A 12 inch screen is not far off US letter size, but also the additional surface area allows the incorporation of a much bigger battery and passive cooling.
The Macbook Air has a screen 1 inch larger than the mainstream thin and light notebooks, and the extra space would prevent any cannibalisation of the Apple handheld markets.
The Macbook Air also hasn't been very successful - too many compromises.
A replacement which was smaller, lighter, cheaper and had working handwriting recognition (and perhaps a good onscreen keyboard) in a portrait format would be perhaps sufficiently different from the mainstream, while being genuinely useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682295</id>
	<title>Re:Mac Tablet History</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1247478240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the Mac camp, that smoke is from a bong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the Mac camp , that smoke is from a bong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the Mac camp, that smoke is from a bong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686479</id>
	<title>Setting itself up to conquer the netbook market.</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1247505420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Apple would be stupid not to be working on a larger variant of the iPod Touch / iPhone as it's been on the request list of so many people for so long. I'd be waiting in line for it even if it's no more powerful than the existing iPhone but had a bigger screen (paperback sized would be about right). I already use my iPod Touch as a portable computer (but not really as a media player) and my only big wishes are to need to scroll less and have all my keys available at once on my virtual keyboard. (Bluetooth keyboard/mouse would be good too.) My wife would want one immediately too as she is torn between carrying on iPhone or a netbook for keeping track of her daily tasks, checkbook, contacts, etc.</p><p>This is a rumor that if it isn't true yet it will be. There is just a world of demand for this product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Apple would be stupid not to be working on a larger variant of the iPod Touch / iPhone as it 's been on the request list of so many people for so long .
I 'd be waiting in line for it even if it 's no more powerful than the existing iPhone but had a bigger screen ( paperback sized would be about right ) .
I already use my iPod Touch as a portable computer ( but not really as a media player ) and my only big wishes are to need to scroll less and have all my keys available at once on my virtual keyboard .
( Bluetooth keyboard/mouse would be good too .
) My wife would want one immediately too as she is torn between carrying on iPhone or a netbook for keeping track of her daily tasks , checkbook , contacts , etc.This is a rumor that if it is n't true yet it will be .
There is just a world of demand for this product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Apple would be stupid not to be working on a larger variant of the iPod Touch / iPhone as it's been on the request list of so many people for so long.
I'd be waiting in line for it even if it's no more powerful than the existing iPhone but had a bigger screen (paperback sized would be about right).
I already use my iPod Touch as a portable computer (but not really as a media player) and my only big wishes are to need to scroll less and have all my keys available at once on my virtual keyboard.
(Bluetooth keyboard/mouse would be good too.
) My wife would want one immediately too as she is torn between carrying on iPhone or a netbook for keeping track of her daily tasks, checkbook, contacts, etc.This is a rumor that if it isn't true yet it will be.
There is just a world of demand for this product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677171</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>Registered Coward v2</author>
	<datestamp>1247502900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know you're half-trolling, since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass. And I can certainly see why you're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are. </p></div><p>I'm not sure why you think I'm trolling.  As an iPhone user, there are a few features that would need to be in a lite version to make me switch.  For me, it's maintaining the screen size, GPS and Exchange connectivity (which is much worse than that on a WinMobile phone, IMHO).

</p><p><div class="quote"><p>
But when you say "Had robust Exchange connectivity" wouldn't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange "Had robust IMAP connectivity"? We have a widely-used, well-documented, long-established, royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access, which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it's Exchange that doesn't speak email.</p><p>If you're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry (any of them) and their lack of an IMAP client, or the ability to monitor more than one mail account, or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing, inbox-only "IMAP" service. I know they're "helping" by providing push email, and it's not a terrible option for some people, but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts, and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification doesn't seem like a big problem for most uses.</p></div><p>I use Exchange for business - and the Iphone's implementation (lack of meeting invite capability, no notes / task synch) is frustrating.  If it weren't for the screen I'd be back to my Treo.</p><p>IMAP for me is a non-starter - our IT shop won't enable it; so it could be the greatest thing in the world but to me it is useless. Even so, the polling delay would be annoying for me.  I've used that before and it was frustrating at times.  While I don't like IT's stance, I'm not going to change it and it's simply not worth the time to try.  To me, Apple should do a better job enabling exchange activesynch; I'm sure there are other business users that would like enhanced capabilities as well.</p><p>I want a solution that works out of the box; the current iPhone is close but not quite there. My biggest gripe is ATT's network has many more dropped calls than I experienced on Verizon; so I'm not all that happy with ATT although I like my iPhone.  My point is that Verizon has an opportunity to draw iPhone customers to its service; if the rumored phone can meet their needs better than the current one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you 're half-trolling , since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass .
And I can certainly see why you 're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are .
I 'm not sure why you think I 'm trolling .
As an iPhone user , there are a few features that would need to be in a lite version to make me switch .
For me , it 's maintaining the screen size , GPS and Exchange connectivity ( which is much worse than that on a WinMobile phone , IMHO ) .
But when you say " Had robust Exchange connectivity " would n't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange " Had robust IMAP connectivity " ?
We have a widely-used , well-documented , long-established , royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access , which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it 's Exchange that does n't speak email.If you 're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry ( any of them ) and their lack of an IMAP client , or the ability to monitor more than one mail account , or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing , inbox-only " IMAP " service .
I know they 're " helping " by providing push email , and it 's not a terrible option for some people , but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts , and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification does n't seem like a big problem for most uses.I use Exchange for business - and the Iphone 's implementation ( lack of meeting invite capability , no notes / task synch ) is frustrating .
If it were n't for the screen I 'd be back to my Treo.IMAP for me is a non-starter - our IT shop wo n't enable it ; so it could be the greatest thing in the world but to me it is useless .
Even so , the polling delay would be annoying for me .
I 've used that before and it was frustrating at times .
While I do n't like IT 's stance , I 'm not going to change it and it 's simply not worth the time to try .
To me , Apple should do a better job enabling exchange activesynch ; I 'm sure there are other business users that would like enhanced capabilities as well.I want a solution that works out of the box ; the current iPhone is close but not quite there .
My biggest gripe is ATT 's network has many more dropped calls than I experienced on Verizon ; so I 'm not all that happy with ATT although I like my iPhone .
My point is that Verizon has an opportunity to draw iPhone customers to its service ; if the rumored phone can meet their needs better than the current one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you're half-trolling, since the current iPhone has both GPS and a magnetic compass.
And I can certainly see why you're not as irrationally excited by the iPhone as other are.
I'm not sure why you think I'm trolling.
As an iPhone user, there are a few features that would need to be in a lite version to make me switch.
For me, it's maintaining the screen size, GPS and Exchange connectivity (which is much worse than that on a WinMobile phone, IMHO).
But when you say "Had robust Exchange connectivity" wouldn't it be more reasonable to ask that Exchange "Had robust IMAP connectivity"?
We have a widely-used, well-documented, long-established, royalty-free protocol for remote mailbox access, which the iPhone supports fairly well -- it's Exchange that doesn't speak email.If you're going to whine about email access on a phone you should whine about the BlackBerry (any of them) and their lack of an IMAP client, or the ability to monitor more than one mail account, or the ability to not send your credentials to the BB server if you do use their non-syncing, inbox-only "IMAP" service.
I know they're "helping" by providing push email, and it's not a terrible option for some people, but I get perfectly good battery life polling for email in 3 separate accounts, and the 2-minute average/4-minute maximum delay between message delivery and notification doesn't seem like a big problem for most uses.I use Exchange for business - and the Iphone's implementation (lack of meeting invite capability, no notes / task synch) is frustrating.
If it weren't for the screen I'd be back to my Treo.IMAP for me is a non-starter - our IT shop won't enable it; so it could be the greatest thing in the world but to me it is useless.
Even so, the polling delay would be annoying for me.
I've used that before and it was frustrating at times.
While I don't like IT's stance, I'm not going to change it and it's simply not worth the time to try.
To me, Apple should do a better job enabling exchange activesynch; I'm sure there are other business users that would like enhanced capabilities as well.I want a solution that works out of the box; the current iPhone is close but not quite there.
My biggest gripe is ATT's network has many more dropped calls than I experienced on Verizon; so I'm not all that happy with ATT although I like my iPhone.
My point is that Verizon has an opportunity to draw iPhone customers to its service; if the rumored phone can meet their needs better than the current one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675295</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675653</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>macs4all</author>
	<datestamp>1247497380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Haha ok let me break this down to you. First of all that "perfectly good" part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees. Secondly there are huge differences between unix like OSs. And last but not least, some people like to own whatever they've bought rather than lease it. That's why.</p></div><p>Haha, ok, let me break THIS down to [sic] you:
<br> <br>
UNLIKE Linux, OS X is NOT, repeat NOT, a "Unix-LIKE OS". <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2007/08/mac-os-x-leopard-receives-unix-03-certification.ars" title="arstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">It IS a Unix OS</a> [arstechnica.com].<br> <br>
Just because you Linux fanbois are jealous for being a TRUE Unix (instead of a WANNABE Unix), doesn't mean you have to diss OS X.<br> <br>
BTW nice keeping up with tech-news. OS X has been a certified Unix since 2007...
<br> <br>
Is that my karma I smell burning?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha ok let me break this down to you .
First of all that " perfectly good " part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees .
Secondly there are huge differences between unix like OSs .
And last but not least , some people like to own whatever they 've bought rather than lease it .
That 's why.Haha , ok , let me break THIS down to [ sic ] you : UNLIKE Linux , OS X is NOT , repeat NOT , a " Unix-LIKE OS " .
It IS a Unix OS [ arstechnica.com ] .
Just because you Linux fanbois are jealous for being a TRUE Unix ( instead of a WANNABE Unix ) , does n't mean you have to diss OS X . BTW nice keeping up with tech-news .
OS X has been a certified Unix since 2007.. . Is that my karma I smell burning ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha ok let me break this down to you.
First of all that "perfectly good" part is solely your opinion and believe it or not not everybody agrees.
Secondly there are huge differences between unix like OSs.
And last but not least, some people like to own whatever they've bought rather than lease it.
That's why.Haha, ok, let me break THIS down to [sic] you:
 
UNLIKE Linux, OS X is NOT, repeat NOT, a "Unix-LIKE OS".
It IS a Unix OS [arstechnica.com].
Just because you Linux fanbois are jealous for being a TRUE Unix (instead of a WANNABE Unix), doesn't mean you have to diss OS X. 
BTW nice keeping up with tech-news.
OS X has been a certified Unix since 2007...
 
Is that my karma I smell burning?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686745</id>
	<title>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux,</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1247507640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X...</i> </p><p>Because it will do more.  I am typing this on a MacBook Pro I'm thinking about installing Ubuntu Studio on.  If I do I will be able to run software on it I haven't been able to run on it yet.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this thing ( assuming it existed ) would most likely run OS X... Because it will do more .
I am typing this on a MacBook Pro I 'm thinking about installing Ubuntu Studio on .
If I do I will be able to run software on it I have n't been able to run on it yet .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X... Because it will do more.
I am typing this on a MacBook Pro I'm thinking about installing Ubuntu Studio on.
If I do I will be able to run software on it I haven't been able to run on it yet.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681867</id>
	<title>Re:You can't be serious?</title>
	<author>Capt.DrumkenBum</author>
	<datestamp>1247476380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot, it will sell for $5000 and qualifies for a $2000 eco-car credit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot , it will sell for $ 5000 and qualifies for a $ 2000 eco-car credit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot, it will sell for $5000 and qualifies for a $2000 eco-car credit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</id>
	<title>64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>64-128 GB of RAM?! heck, i'd buy it, rip the ram modules and throw that thing away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>64-128 GB of RAM ? !
heck , i 'd buy it , rip the ram modules and throw that thing away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>64-128 GB of RAM?!
heck, i'd buy it, rip the ram modules and throw that thing away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399</id>
	<title>Re:64-128 GB of RAM?!</title>
	<author>SensitiveMale</author>
	<datestamp>1247496120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever RAM that was on the pad would be soldered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676239</id>
	<title>Here's the hands-on review</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247499900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://gizmodo.com/363137/axiotron-modbook-review-verdict-a-touchscreen-macbook-done-right</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gizmodo.com/363137/axiotron-modbook-review-verdict-a-touchscreen-macbook-done-right</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gizmodo.com/363137/axiotron-modbook-review-verdict-a-touchscreen-macbook-done-right</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911</id>
	<title>oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>LiquidCoooled</author>
	<datestamp>1247493300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that sounds like a nice device.<br>hackable to run linux, or locked down do you think?<br>my liqbase should be ready by then too.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that sounds like a nice device.hackable to run linux , or locked down do you think ? my liqbase should be ready by then too .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that sounds like a nice device.hackable to run linux, or locked down do you think?my liqbase should be ready by then too.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675199</id>
	<title>sounds nice, but</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1247495220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a nice prediction (not saying anything about its accuracy), but as someone who recently purchased an ebook reader, I don't think I could ever go back to anything but an e-ink screen for long-term reading (though we'll have to see how the Pixel Qi screens are). Being able to read 3 or 4 books without having to think about plugging the device in to recharge is a godsend!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a nice prediction ( not saying anything about its accuracy ) , but as someone who recently purchased an ebook reader , I do n't think I could ever go back to anything but an e-ink screen for long-term reading ( though we 'll have to see how the Pixel Qi screens are ) .
Being able to read 3 or 4 books without having to think about plugging the device in to recharge is a godsend !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a nice prediction (not saying anything about its accuracy), but as someone who recently purchased an ebook reader, I don't think I could ever go back to anything but an e-ink screen for long-term reading (though we'll have to see how the Pixel Qi screens are).
Being able to read 3 or 4 books without having to think about plugging the device in to recharge is a godsend!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684887</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1247492400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that:<br> <br>

kept the same screen size<br> <br>

had robust Exchange connectivity<br> <br>

had an integrated GPS<br> <br>

had decent battery life</p></div></blockquote><p>

Ohh, ohh and a pony. I suppose you expect this device to be cheaper as well.</p><blockquote><div><p>I'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked.</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's just crazy talk, you're locked to a single carrier for our profits^W^W^W I mean your own safety.<br> <br>

Signed,<br>
Your corporate overlord.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that : kept the same screen size had robust Exchange connectivity had an integrated GPS had decent battery life Ohh , ohh and a pony .
I suppose you expect this device to be cheaper as well.I 'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked .
That 's just crazy talk , you 're locked to a single carrier for our profits ^ W ^ W ^ W I mean your own safety .
Signed , Your corporate overlord .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple can come up with a stripped down iPhone that: 

kept the same screen size 

had robust Exchange connectivity 

had an integrated GPS 

had decent battery life

Ohh, ohh and a pony.
I suppose you expect this device to be cheaper as well.I'd even pay a premium for teh GSM side to be unlocked.
That's just crazy talk, you're locked to a single carrier for our profits^W^W^W I mean your own safety.
Signed,
Your corporate overlord.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676117</id>
	<title>Re:Stylus</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1247499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm reminds me that Apple filed a patent on hand gesture recognition that looked at the full contact impression of a hand resting on a surface in a 'pen holding position'... essentially they'd be recognizing the bottom edge of your hand rather than your fingers - as you held an invisible pen and wrote out your notes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm reminds me that Apple filed a patent on hand gesture recognition that looked at the full contact impression of a hand resting on a surface in a 'pen holding position'... essentially they 'd be recognizing the bottom edge of your hand rather than your fingers - as you held an invisible pen and wrote out your notes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm reminds me that Apple filed a patent on hand gesture recognition that looked at the full contact impression of a hand resting on a surface in a 'pen holding position'... essentially they'd be recognizing the bottom edge of your hand rather than your fingers - as you held an invisible pen and wrote out your notes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683947</id>
	<title>Verizon?</title>
	<author>Catalina588</author>
	<datestamp>1247486160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple would not easily abandon tens of millions of AT&amp;T subscribers who own iPhones by forcing them to spend another $100 a month with a new carrier.  Would they?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple would not easily abandon tens of millions of AT&amp;T subscribers who own iPhones by forcing them to spend another $ 100 a month with a new carrier .
Would they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple would not easily abandon tens of millions of AT&amp;T subscribers who own iPhones by forcing them to spend another $100 a month with a new carrier.
Would they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676505</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>the\_humeister</author>
	<datestamp>1247500800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux, this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?</p></div><p>What you fail to see is that at some point, this thing (if it exists) will no longer be supported by Apple. But once Linux and other free unix-like OSes get ported it will be supported practically forever. Take a look at the Old World Macs (and even some of the New World Macs). If you want modern software to run on those things, your only practical option is to run a free unix-like system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux , this thing ( assuming it existed ) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware , and lots of application support , and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that does n't do the half of it... Why ? What you fail to see is that at some point , this thing ( if it exists ) will no longer be supported by Apple .
But once Linux and other free unix-like OSes get ported it will be supported practically forever .
Take a look at the Old World Macs ( and even some of the New World Macs ) .
If you want modern software to run on those things , your only practical option is to run a free unix-like system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth would you hack it to run linux, this thing (assuming it existed) would most likely run OS X... So you take off a perfectly good unix with drivers for all the bits of the hardware, and lots of application support, and replace it with a one-size-fits all OS that doesn't do the half of it... Why?What you fail to see is that at some point, this thing (if it exists) will no longer be supported by Apple.
But once Linux and other free unix-like OSes get ported it will be supported practically forever.
Take a look at the Old World Macs (and even some of the New World Macs).
If you want modern software to run on those things, your only practical option is to run a free unix-like system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684397</id>
	<title>Re:Hey! Let's Just make Shit up!</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1247488860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be ironic if rapid Mac Fanboys make up shit about an Apple product just to make the frontpage of Slashdot, and then Apple decides that it is a good enough idea and then makes it anyway.</p><p>"Hey I'll buy anything from Apple as long as it is shiny and cool looking." -Typical Mac Fanboy from The Onion.</p><p>Signed:</p><p>Onion Blaster</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be ironic if rapid Mac Fanboys make up shit about an Apple product just to make the frontpage of Slashdot , and then Apple decides that it is a good enough idea and then makes it anyway .
" Hey I 'll buy anything from Apple as long as it is shiny and cool looking .
" -Typical Mac Fanboy from The Onion.Signed : Onion Blaster</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be ironic if rapid Mac Fanboys make up shit about an Apple product just to make the frontpage of Slashdot, and then Apple decides that it is a good enough idea and then makes it anyway.
"Hey I'll buy anything from Apple as long as it is shiny and cool looking.
" -Typical Mac Fanboy from The Onion.Signed:Onion Blaster</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686501</id>
	<title>Re:A Data plan?</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1247505720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple should give away WiFi APs that offer both a private AP and an open AP that is secure enough that users don't have to worry and uses bandwidth controls so users of the open network get lower bandwidth priority and can't be abusive. Even if the open AP could only be used by their products. Sprinkle them all over and work at getting them within businesses, parks, etc. Heck, I'd buy the device if I could. I've owned similar APs but they lacked the needed bandwidth and security controls (or were to hard/expensive) for the open AP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple should give away WiFi APs that offer both a private AP and an open AP that is secure enough that users do n't have to worry and uses bandwidth controls so users of the open network get lower bandwidth priority and ca n't be abusive .
Even if the open AP could only be used by their products .
Sprinkle them all over and work at getting them within businesses , parks , etc .
Heck , I 'd buy the device if I could .
I 've owned similar APs but they lacked the needed bandwidth and security controls ( or were to hard/expensive ) for the open AP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple should give away WiFi APs that offer both a private AP and an open AP that is secure enough that users don't have to worry and uses bandwidth controls so users of the open network get lower bandwidth priority and can't be abusive.
Even if the open AP could only be used by their products.
Sprinkle them all over and work at getting them within businesses, parks, etc.
Heck, I'd buy the device if I could.
I've owned similar APs but they lacked the needed bandwidth and security controls (or were to hard/expensive) for the open AP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675129</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone lite?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247494680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that Verizon is a CMDA network and chances are there would be no GSM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that Verizon is a CMDA network and chances are there would be no GSM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that Verizon is a CMDA network and chances are there would be no GSM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674901</id>
	<title>Challenge?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too.</p></div><p>How about making the iPhone and MacPad dependent and lock out any 3rd party looking for some interoperability? Seems to have worked for Apple in the past.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple 's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too.How about making the iPhone and MacPad dependent and lock out any 3rd party looking for some interoperability ?
Seems to have worked for Apple in the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too.How about making the iPhone and MacPad dependent and lock out any 3rd party looking for some interoperability?
Seems to have worked for Apple in the past.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675141</id>
	<title>Duke Nukem Called</title>
	<author>salesgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1247494800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and wants his Mac tablet.  He said to pick it up after the Forever release party, and just before Microsoft releases BobLive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and wants his Mac tablet .
He said to pick it up after the Forever release party , and just before Microsoft releases BobLive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and wants his Mac tablet.
He said to pick it up after the Forever release party, and just before Microsoft releases BobLive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675919</id>
	<title>Re:I know this is hearsay but...</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1247498520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear god.  This thing all sounds entirely possible, but I still ain't buyin' it.</p><p>These portable and fragile electronic devices need a much lower price point.  But for some reason, having a picture of an apple with a bite taken out of it will bring in twice what the thing is actually worth.</p><p>The same could be said of Sony.  Sony it largely getting by on its twenty+ year old reputation as "Sony, the one and only" creator of the smallest and most revolutionary gear.  Their stuff isn't as great as it once was and both quality and customer support vary across the spectrum being both good and bad depending on which products you buy. [Read: very inconsistent]  But as we all know today, Sony's reputation has been eroding steadily and there is a growing group of consumers who simply refuse to buy anything with a Sony logo.</p><p>Back to Apple.  If Apple continues down this road, they may find themselves in a similar situation as Sony.  The more they expand their market to new users with new products, the more critical users they will have.  This spells out "problem" as Apple has been getting by in their limited market based largely on fanboy-ism.  Apple users buy Apple products traditionally... and defend Apple products ferociously.  (Especially by modding posts like mine down!)  But with a growing group of users, criticism over price, quality and flexibility are also growing.  There are lots of descenting opinions and views of Apple on these topics.  (My wife wants a new Apple workstation computer, but have you checked the prices on those beasts?  I'm going to build her a Hackintosh using those EFI hacks that get MacOSX installed without modification.  The price of a comparable machine is about half or less!)  As for quality?  The frequency of defects is pretty astounding in my opinion having personally had to bring macbook pros to the local apple store for system board replacement multiple times.  And flexibility?  The list of things that Apple prohibits and/or inhibits is simply growing and raising lots of complaints across the whole product line.</p><p>These critical points are not noticed by Apple fanboys.  To them it's normal, average or otherwise acceptable... and some will even hold Apple is quite superior to others in spite of evidence to the contrary.  But once again, as their user-base is growing, so too grows the number of critics and descenting opinions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear god .
This thing all sounds entirely possible , but I still ai n't buyin ' it.These portable and fragile electronic devices need a much lower price point .
But for some reason , having a picture of an apple with a bite taken out of it will bring in twice what the thing is actually worth.The same could be said of Sony .
Sony it largely getting by on its twenty + year old reputation as " Sony , the one and only " creator of the smallest and most revolutionary gear .
Their stuff is n't as great as it once was and both quality and customer support vary across the spectrum being both good and bad depending on which products you buy .
[ Read : very inconsistent ] But as we all know today , Sony 's reputation has been eroding steadily and there is a growing group of consumers who simply refuse to buy anything with a Sony logo.Back to Apple .
If Apple continues down this road , they may find themselves in a similar situation as Sony .
The more they expand their market to new users with new products , the more critical users they will have .
This spells out " problem " as Apple has been getting by in their limited market based largely on fanboy-ism .
Apple users buy Apple products traditionally... and defend Apple products ferociously .
( Especially by modding posts like mine down !
) But with a growing group of users , criticism over price , quality and flexibility are also growing .
There are lots of descenting opinions and views of Apple on these topics .
( My wife wants a new Apple workstation computer , but have you checked the prices on those beasts ?
I 'm going to build her a Hackintosh using those EFI hacks that get MacOSX installed without modification .
The price of a comparable machine is about half or less !
) As for quality ?
The frequency of defects is pretty astounding in my opinion having personally had to bring macbook pros to the local apple store for system board replacement multiple times .
And flexibility ?
The list of things that Apple prohibits and/or inhibits is simply growing and raising lots of complaints across the whole product line.These critical points are not noticed by Apple fanboys .
To them it 's normal , average or otherwise acceptable... and some will even hold Apple is quite superior to others in spite of evidence to the contrary .
But once again , as their user-base is growing , so too grows the number of critics and descenting opinions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear god.
This thing all sounds entirely possible, but I still ain't buyin' it.These portable and fragile electronic devices need a much lower price point.
But for some reason, having a picture of an apple with a bite taken out of it will bring in twice what the thing is actually worth.The same could be said of Sony.
Sony it largely getting by on its twenty+ year old reputation as "Sony, the one and only" creator of the smallest and most revolutionary gear.
Their stuff isn't as great as it once was and both quality and customer support vary across the spectrum being both good and bad depending on which products you buy.
[Read: very inconsistent]  But as we all know today, Sony's reputation has been eroding steadily and there is a growing group of consumers who simply refuse to buy anything with a Sony logo.Back to Apple.
If Apple continues down this road, they may find themselves in a similar situation as Sony.
The more they expand their market to new users with new products, the more critical users they will have.
This spells out "problem" as Apple has been getting by in their limited market based largely on fanboy-ism.
Apple users buy Apple products traditionally... and defend Apple products ferociously.
(Especially by modding posts like mine down!
)  But with a growing group of users, criticism over price, quality and flexibility are also growing.
There are lots of descenting opinions and views of Apple on these topics.
(My wife wants a new Apple workstation computer, but have you checked the prices on those beasts?
I'm going to build her a Hackintosh using those EFI hacks that get MacOSX installed without modification.
The price of a comparable machine is about half or less!
)  As for quality?
The frequency of defects is pretty astounding in my opinion having personally had to bring macbook pros to the local apple store for system board replacement multiple times.
And flexibility?
The list of things that Apple prohibits and/or inhibits is simply growing and raising lots of complaints across the whole product line.These critical points are not noticed by Apple fanboys.
To them it's normal, average or otherwise acceptable... and some will even hold Apple is quite superior to others in spite of evidence to the contrary.
But once again, as their user-base is growing, so too grows the number of critics and descenting opinions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674977</id>
	<title>You can't be serious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tomorrow's headline will no doubt read, "First 'Behind the Stick' Review of Production Model Flying Car!" What the hey, here's a quote from the article that's not yet been written; "The SuperFlyer 6000 rides smooth as silk and corners like it's on rails. At 144 miles per gallon, you couldn't ask for more, save for the stereo which is a little bit lacking with it's 5.1 surround (we'd prefer 7.1)."</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tomorrow 's headline will no doubt read , " First 'Behind the Stick ' Review of Production Model Flying Car !
" What the hey , here 's a quote from the article that 's not yet been written ; " The SuperFlyer 6000 rides smooth as silk and corners like it 's on rails .
At 144 miles per gallon , you could n't ask for more , save for the stereo which is a little bit lacking with it 's 5.1 surround ( we 'd prefer 7.1 ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tomorrow's headline will no doubt read, "First 'Behind the Stick' Review of Production Model Flying Car!
" What the hey, here's a quote from the article that's not yet been written; "The SuperFlyer 6000 rides smooth as silk and corners like it's on rails.
At 144 miles per gallon, you couldn't ask for more, save for the stereo which is a little bit lacking with it's 5.1 surround (we'd prefer 7.1).
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675315</id>
	<title>Wow, 64GB to 128GB or RAM!</title>
	<author>kybur</author>
	<datestamp>1247495760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With that amount of RAM, I wonder how much flash storage Apple is going to include!
<p>
I agree with the "Hey! Let's just make Shit up" poster.
</p><p>
How exactly is this newsworthy?
</p><p>
Come on, Slashdot.  I like apple as much as the next guy, but this is just pointless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With that amount of RAM , I wonder how much flash storage Apple is going to include !
I agree with the " Hey !
Let 's just make Shit up " poster .
How exactly is this newsworthy ?
Come on , Slashdot .
I like apple as much as the next guy , but this is just pointless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With that amount of RAM, I wonder how much flash storage Apple is going to include!
I agree with the "Hey!
Let's just make Shit up" poster.
How exactly is this newsworthy?
Come on, Slashdot.
I like apple as much as the next guy, but this is just pointless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676853</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247501820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A price that's so high only Apple lovers will pay (again and again) for the privilege of using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A price that 's so high only Apple lovers will pay ( again and again ) for the privilege of using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A price that's so high only Apple lovers will pay (again and again) for the privilege of using it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675197</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247495160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i say why because my app only runs on linux (for now).<br>i don't know anything about multiplatform stuff and wouldn't even try to (I'm a VB developer..)</p><p>raw c, x11+xv is about as far as I know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i say why because my app only runs on linux ( for now ) .i do n't know anything about multiplatform stuff and would n't even try to ( I 'm a VB developer.. ) raw c , x11 + xv is about as far as I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i say why because my app only runs on linux (for now).i don't know anything about multiplatform stuff and wouldn't even try to (I'm a VB developer..)raw c, x11+xv is about as far as I know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675981</id>
	<title>Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247498760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not just be done with it and become a Apple Fanboi site?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just be done with it and become a Apple Fanboi site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just be done with it and become a Apple Fanboi site?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674971</id>
	<title>Price point</title>
	<author>Zouden</author>
	<datestamp>1247493720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When "a price of $599" doesn't sound intellectual enough, call it a <i>price point</i> and suddenly you sound like an expert.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When " a price of $ 599 " does n't sound intellectual enough , call it a price point and suddenly you sound like an expert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When "a price of $599" doesn't sound intellectual enough, call it a price point and suddenly you sound like an expert.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675127</id>
	<title>Re:A review of product that is a rumor..</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1247494680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, you got that right. <br>
FTFA:<blockquote><div><p>Recently, I spent some time reviewing real and rumored technologies to lay out my predictions about a possible Apple Mac Tablet or MacPad. My predictions are mostly just for fun and I am making no bets as to their accuracy.</p></div></blockquote><p>I can believe someone was foolish enough to submit this, but putting it on the front page is freaking absurd.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , you got that right .
FTFA : Recently , I spent some time reviewing real and rumored technologies to lay out my predictions about a possible Apple Mac Tablet or MacPad .
My predictions are mostly just for fun and I am making no bets as to their accuracy.I can believe someone was foolish enough to submit this , but putting it on the front page is freaking absurd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, you got that right.
FTFA:Recently, I spent some time reviewing real and rumored technologies to lay out my predictions about a possible Apple Mac Tablet or MacPad.
My predictions are mostly just for fun and I am making no bets as to their accuracy.I can believe someone was foolish enough to submit this, but putting it on the front page is freaking absurd.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676607</id>
	<title>I was pleasantly surprised by /.</title>
	<author>wfolta</author>
	<datestamp>1247501100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read the linked Slashdot thread on the iPhone, I was pleasantly surprised to find that almost all high-scoring posts were in fact reasonable and ultimately proved to be correct. Sort of restores my faith in Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read the linked Slashdot thread on the iPhone , I was pleasantly surprised to find that almost all high-scoring posts were in fact reasonable and ultimately proved to be correct .
Sort of restores my faith in Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read the linked Slashdot thread on the iPhone, I was pleasantly surprised to find that almost all high-scoring posts were in fact reasonable and ultimately proved to be correct.
Sort of restores my faith in Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675005</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple expects people to shell out $600 for something a eeepc can do (for less) in the current state of the economy? I really don't know if this is going to work but if it does work then I have greatly underestimated the power of brand loyalty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple expects people to shell out $ 600 for something a eeepc can do ( for less ) in the current state of the economy ?
I really do n't know if this is going to work but if it does work then I have greatly underestimated the power of brand loyalty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple expects people to shell out $600 for something a eeepc can do (for less) in the current state of the economy?
I really don't know if this is going to work but if it does work then I have greatly underestimated the power of brand loyalty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999</id>
	<title>Hey! Let's Just make Shit up!</title>
	<author>GaryPatterson</author>
	<datestamp>1247493900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, a product that's never been announced and only ever carried by the rumours that "it'd be really cool if Apple did, like, a tablet, you know!" is being discussed.</p><p>There is no substance at all, no "there" there. How can anyone seriously discuss what to expect from a product that has no information whatsoever about it? It's just all circle-jerk stuff, the sort of stuff kids fantasise about but has no connection to reality.</p><p>(sigh) I love talking tech as much as anyone, but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality?</p><p>Hell, it's just as likely to hover 14 cm above a solid surface, have a voxel-based GPU, holographic memory unit all powered by a microtok generator. Why not just make shit up? The UI will be based on the user's thoughts, but will react before the user knows they're thinking about an action because <i>that's how cool it'll probably be, maybe.</i></p><p>Yup. News for nerds. Making shit up. So what does The Onion do for stories these days if Slashdot is going to nick the good ones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , a product that 's never been announced and only ever carried by the rumours that " it 'd be really cool if Apple did , like , a tablet , you know !
" is being discussed.There is no substance at all , no " there " there .
How can anyone seriously discuss what to expect from a product that has no information whatsoever about it ?
It 's just all circle-jerk stuff , the sort of stuff kids fantasise about but has no connection to reality .
( sigh ) I love talking tech as much as anyone , but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality ? Hell , it 's just as likely to hover 14 cm above a solid surface , have a voxel-based GPU , holographic memory unit all powered by a microtok generator .
Why not just make shit up ?
The UI will be based on the user 's thoughts , but will react before the user knows they 're thinking about an action because that 's how cool it 'll probably be , maybe.Yup .
News for nerds .
Making shit up .
So what does The Onion do for stories these days if Slashdot is going to nick the good ones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, a product that's never been announced and only ever carried by the rumours that "it'd be really cool if Apple did, like, a tablet, you know!
" is being discussed.There is no substance at all, no "there" there.
How can anyone seriously discuss what to expect from a product that has no information whatsoever about it?
It's just all circle-jerk stuff, the sort of stuff kids fantasise about but has no connection to reality.
(sigh) I love talking tech as much as anyone, but can we at least try to stay grounded in reality?Hell, it's just as likely to hover 14 cm above a solid surface, have a voxel-based GPU, holographic memory unit all powered by a microtok generator.
Why not just make shit up?
The UI will be based on the user's thoughts, but will react before the user knows they're thinking about an action because that's how cool it'll probably be, maybe.Yup.
News for nerds.
Making shit up.
So what does The Onion do for stories these days if Slashdot is going to nick the good ones?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674985</id>
	<title>Verizon data plan...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247493840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It won't arrive where I live then. And where Verizon is there Kindle already. I might not like Kindle but it is hugely successful where you can actually buy it. So I don't think that would be a good move.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't arrive where I live then .
And where Verizon is there Kindle already .
I might not like Kindle but it is hugely successful where you can actually buy it .
So I do n't think that would be a good move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't arrive where I live then.
And where Verizon is there Kindle already.
I might not like Kindle but it is hugely successful where you can actually buy it.
So I don't think that would be a good move.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677537</id>
	<title>Re:oooh i wonder if liqbase will run on it</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1247504220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was just about to post such a comment. I have been waiting for such a device, and with the genius minimalistic design from Apple... just have to wait for Multi-pointer X.</p><p>Just give me a portable lightweight touchscreen with decent hardware and I'd buy it as soon as a Linux distro supports it!</p><p>Oh and a mini-jack...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just about to post such a comment .
I have been waiting for such a device , and with the genius minimalistic design from Apple... just have to wait for Multi-pointer X.Just give me a portable lightweight touchscreen with decent hardware and I 'd buy it as soon as a Linux distro supports it ! Oh and a mini-jack.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just about to post such a comment.
I have been waiting for such a device, and with the genius minimalistic design from Apple... just have to wait for Multi-pointer X.Just give me a portable lightweight touchscreen with decent hardware and I'd buy it as soon as a Linux distro supports it!Oh and a mini-jack...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676657</id>
	<title>Wrong.</title>
	<author>monoqlith</author>
	<datestamp>1247501220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too. "</p><p>What? No.</p><p>First of all, if this "MacPad" exists it is not going to be targetted at existing iPhone customers. It will be targetted at existing Mac users and PC users. From what I'm hearing this thing more akin to a mobile PC than a Netbook-ified cell phone.  You're not going to convince many users of the expensive but very functional iPhone that they need yet <i>another</i> mobile device. So, yes, in a way, this would be a challenge, such a big one, in fact, that it would make no sense to try to do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Apple 's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too .
" What ? No.First of all , if this " MacPad " exists it is not going to be targetted at existing iPhone customers .
It will be targetted at existing Mac users and PC users .
From what I 'm hearing this thing more akin to a mobile PC than a Netbook-ified cell phone .
You 're not going to convince many users of the expensive but very functional iPhone that they need yet another mobile device .
So , yes , in a way , this would be a challenge , such a big one , in fact , that it would make no sense to try to do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Apple's biggest challenge will be convincing its huge installed base of iPhone owners that they need a MacPad too.
"What? No.First of all, if this "MacPad" exists it is not going to be targetted at existing iPhone customers.
It will be targetted at existing Mac users and PC users.
From what I'm hearing this thing more akin to a mobile PC than a Netbook-ified cell phone.
You're not going to convince many users of the expensive but very functional iPhone that they need yet another mobile device.
So, yes, in a way, this would be a challenge, such a big one, in fact, that it would make no sense to try to do it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28688821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28680681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28679219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675369
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676713
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28678151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_13_1229250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675127
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675057
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675077
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676125
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687387
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676505
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675841
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28680681
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675197
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677627
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687677
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675443
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675653
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675999
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675069
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675645
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677885
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675399
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28679219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28678151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28688821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675295
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28684397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28687573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675527
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28677507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28683521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28676117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28686479
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28682487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28675775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_13_1229250.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28674977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_13_1229250.28681867
</commentlist>
</conversation>
