<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_09_1243231</id>
	<title>Google Reveals Chrome Hardware Partners</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1247143920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">nk497</a> writes <i>"Google has announced the <a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/612541/google-reveals-chrome-hardware-partners">hardware partners for the Chrome OS</a> &mdash; so we can expect to see netbooks running the operating system next year from the likes of Asus, Acer, and HP, as well as Toshiba. Dell didn't seem to make the list, at least yet. Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nk497 writes " Google has announced the hardware partners for the Chrome OS    so we can expect to see netbooks running the operating system next year from the likes of Asus , Acer , and HP , as well as Toshiba .
Dell did n't seem to make the list , at least yet .
Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe , which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nk497 writes "Google has announced the hardware partners for the Chrome OS — so we can expect to see netbooks running the operating system next year from the likes of Asus, Acer, and HP, as well as Toshiba.
Dell didn't seem to make the list, at least yet.
Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635199</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247148420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>btw<br>FP hohoho</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>btwFP hohoho</tokentext>
<sentencetext>btwFP hohoho</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635491</id>
	<title>Re:Down with G$$GLE</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247150040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read that as "Giggle".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that as " Giggle " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that as "Giggle".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635459</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My presentations are usually outside my office. Relying on a working internet connection for them sounds like a a major PITA to me, considering how much effort is usually involved for accessing a corporate LAN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My presentations are usually outside my office .
Relying on a working internet connection for them sounds like a a major PITA to me , considering how much effort is usually involved for accessing a corporate LAN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My presentations are usually outside my office.
Relying on a working internet connection for them sounds like a a major PITA to me, considering how much effort is usually involved for accessing a corporate LAN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645115</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would suspect super cookies might be of more interest...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would suspect super cookies might be of more interest.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would suspect super cookies might be of more interest...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263</id>
	<title>Acrobat, huh</title>
	<author>MadFarmAnimalz</author>
	<datestamp>1247148780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.</i>
<p>
Umm, no. Flash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe , which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way .
Umm , no .
Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.
Umm, no.
Flash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171</id>
	<title>Down with G$$GLE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247148240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The G$$GLE-borg wants to take away our freedom with their shitty corporate crapware. Thank goodness for Microsoft, I support the feisty Microsoft freedomware guerillas against the evil G$$GLE empire!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The G $ $ GLE-borg wants to take away our freedom with their shitty corporate crapware .
Thank goodness for Microsoft , I support the feisty Microsoft freedomware guerillas against the evil G $ $ GLE empire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The G$$GLE-borg wants to take away our freedom with their shitty corporate crapware.
Thank goodness for Microsoft, I support the feisty Microsoft freedomware guerillas against the evil G$$GLE empire!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645299</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>mabinogi</author>
	<datestamp>1247151240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux</p> </div><p>Why on earth would you think that?</p><p>It's for netbooks - so that means Atom (32 bit x86) or ARM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux Why on earth would you think that ? It 's for netbooks - so that means Atom ( 32 bit x86 ) or ARM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux Why on earth would you think that?It's for netbooks - so that means Atom (32 bit x86) or ARM.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636251</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>wakingrufus</author>
	<datestamp>1247153220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>see: gnash</htmltext>
<tokenext>see : gnash</tokentext>
<sentencetext>see: gnash</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641967</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>Evil-G</author>
	<datestamp>1247132760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably not for as long as Windows...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not for as long as Windows.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not for as long as Windows...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149</id>
	<title>Will Chrome OS be any different...</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1247148180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...as compared to <a href="http://www.startforce.com/" title="startforce.com"> this</a> [startforce.com]? If not then Google will have a hard time convincing me to switch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...as compared to this [ startforce.com ] ?
If not then Google will have a hard time convincing me to switch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as compared to  this [startforce.com]?
If not then Google will have a hard time convincing me to switch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639913</id>
	<title>The other marketing advantage</title>
	<author>Rob Y.</author>
	<datestamp>1247167560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know not <i>all</i> off the netbook retreat to XP was driven by Microsoft's pressure (though I'm sure there was plenty of that too).</p><p>The various netbook Linux'es were not great.  Just read Slashdot, etc.  Everyone was happy, happy, happy that Linux netbooks were being sold... and then they went on to say that the distros on the netbooks were crap - you should replace them with distro X.  Is it any wonder that once the price advantage was gone, the netbook OEM's went with XP?  Linux may well have worked better on their netbooks... but which Linux?</p><p>(pauses to dodge incoming bombs)</p><p>Anyway, notice that now that Google's in the mix, Asus, etc are coming back.  It's not because Google's a sure thing.  It's not even because it'll be better than what they were using before (though Google's no slouch - their stuff's pretty great).  It's because the OEM's want a single alternative OS, and Google's name recognition guarantees that people will have heard of it.</p><p>Linux distros are great.  I use Mandriva, when I'm not using Fedora or Ubuntu.  That's right.  I'm part of the 'problem'.  And if I don't like Chrome OS, I'll replace it with what I want.  But I'm not Joe Consumer.  And Asus is selling to good old Joe.  I'm ready to stop blaming Asus for their timidity or their lack of software development savvy.  It's not their job to be great OS developers (or even supporters).  And if Google's willing to take on that job, that's great news.</p><p>The only problem I see with this is that Google's conceding the desktop application market to Microsoft.  Making this a 'web-only' device is very limiting.  Limiting to what Google is happy to have you limited to, but limiting nonetheless.  If there were a 'standard' Linux distro that had enough mindshare (and was good enough) for the OEMs to annoint it the standard, that might have produced something we Linux fans would've liked better.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and then we could have junked it and put on our distros of choice.  That's CHOICE as in 'always good, no matter what, no matter where'.  Except when it's not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know not all off the netbook retreat to XP was driven by Microsoft 's pressure ( though I 'm sure there was plenty of that too ) .The various netbook Linux'es were not great .
Just read Slashdot , etc .
Everyone was happy , happy , happy that Linux netbooks were being sold... and then they went on to say that the distros on the netbooks were crap - you should replace them with distro X. Is it any wonder that once the price advantage was gone , the netbook OEM 's went with XP ?
Linux may well have worked better on their netbooks... but which Linux ?
( pauses to dodge incoming bombs ) Anyway , notice that now that Google 's in the mix , Asus , etc are coming back .
It 's not because Google 's a sure thing .
It 's not even because it 'll be better than what they were using before ( though Google 's no slouch - their stuff 's pretty great ) .
It 's because the OEM 's want a single alternative OS , and Google 's name recognition guarantees that people will have heard of it.Linux distros are great .
I use Mandriva , when I 'm not using Fedora or Ubuntu .
That 's right .
I 'm part of the 'problem' .
And if I do n't like Chrome OS , I 'll replace it with what I want .
But I 'm not Joe Consumer .
And Asus is selling to good old Joe .
I 'm ready to stop blaming Asus for their timidity or their lack of software development savvy .
It 's not their job to be great OS developers ( or even supporters ) .
And if Google 's willing to take on that job , that 's great news.The only problem I see with this is that Google 's conceding the desktop application market to Microsoft .
Making this a 'web-only ' device is very limiting .
Limiting to what Google is happy to have you limited to , but limiting nonetheless .
If there were a 'standard ' Linux distro that had enough mindshare ( and was good enough ) for the OEMs to annoint it the standard , that might have produced something we Linux fans would 've liked better .
...and then we could have junked it and put on our distros of choice .
That 's CHOICE as in 'always good , no matter what , no matter where' .
Except when it 's not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know not all off the netbook retreat to XP was driven by Microsoft's pressure (though I'm sure there was plenty of that too).The various netbook Linux'es were not great.
Just read Slashdot, etc.
Everyone was happy, happy, happy that Linux netbooks were being sold... and then they went on to say that the distros on the netbooks were crap - you should replace them with distro X.  Is it any wonder that once the price advantage was gone, the netbook OEM's went with XP?
Linux may well have worked better on their netbooks... but which Linux?
(pauses to dodge incoming bombs)Anyway, notice that now that Google's in the mix, Asus, etc are coming back.
It's not because Google's a sure thing.
It's not even because it'll be better than what they were using before (though Google's no slouch - their stuff's pretty great).
It's because the OEM's want a single alternative OS, and Google's name recognition guarantees that people will have heard of it.Linux distros are great.
I use Mandriva, when I'm not using Fedora or Ubuntu.
That's right.
I'm part of the 'problem'.
And if I don't like Chrome OS, I'll replace it with what I want.
But I'm not Joe Consumer.
And Asus is selling to good old Joe.
I'm ready to stop blaming Asus for their timidity or their lack of software development savvy.
It's not their job to be great OS developers (or even supporters).
And if Google's willing to take on that job, that's great news.The only problem I see with this is that Google's conceding the desktop application market to Microsoft.
Making this a 'web-only' device is very limiting.
Limiting to what Google is happy to have you limited to, but limiting nonetheless.
If there were a 'standard' Linux distro that had enough mindshare (and was good enough) for the OEMs to annoint it the standard, that might have produced something we Linux fans would've liked better.
...and then we could have junked it and put on our distros of choice.
That's CHOICE as in 'always good, no matter what, no matter where'.
Except when it's not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647847</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt you'll get photoshop as a separate app only app they'll be running is Chrome), if Gaikai does what it says on the tin, Adobe can provide a fully featured photoshop as a web app. Since the video presentation of Gaikai already show Photoshop working, I'm gonna venture a guess that Adobe is already talking with Gaikai seriously. Even if they end up not using Gaikai itself, I'd guess Adobe would develop something similar to allow their heavier apps to run in the browser. Come to think of it, they might make their own version so it could also be used while off-line (like google docs etc.)<br>http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/gaikai-cloud-computing-gameplay-that-works-blog-entry</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt you 'll get photoshop as a separate app only app they 'll be running is Chrome ) , if Gaikai does what it says on the tin , Adobe can provide a fully featured photoshop as a web app .
Since the video presentation of Gaikai already show Photoshop working , I 'm gon na venture a guess that Adobe is already talking with Gaikai seriously .
Even if they end up not using Gaikai itself , I 'd guess Adobe would develop something similar to allow their heavier apps to run in the browser .
Come to think of it , they might make their own version so it could also be used while off-line ( like google docs etc .
) http : //www.eurogamer.net/articles/gaikai-cloud-computing-gameplay-that-works-blog-entry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt you'll get photoshop as a separate app only app they'll be running is Chrome), if Gaikai does what it says on the tin, Adobe can provide a fully featured photoshop as a web app.
Since the video presentation of Gaikai already show Photoshop working, I'm gonna venture a guess that Adobe is already talking with Gaikai seriously.
Even if they end up not using Gaikai itself, I'd guess Adobe would develop something similar to allow their heavier apps to run in the browser.
Come to think of it, they might make their own version so it could also be used while off-line (like google docs etc.
)http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/gaikai-cloud-computing-gameplay-that-works-blog-entry</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644261</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247143020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How does you company feel about keeping it's money in outside banks?</p></div><p>This is a nice piece of rhetoric, but really it's not the same. Bank deposits are, to various degrees, guaranteed by the government. This is possible because money is fungible. If the money in the bank goes away (embezzled or whatever) it can be replaced with other, equivalent money. If your data goes away it's gone forever.</p><p>What's more, if someone misappropriates your money the damage is strictly limited to the amount of money taken. Sensitive information is much more powerful and could be used to do any amount of harm.</p><p>Having said that, I think using Google Docs is not the greatest information security risk in most organizations. Most companies I've been involved with think little of using Skype or MSN Messenger for internal communication, send important passwords via email and have no protection against employees taking data outside the firewall via USB stick, laptop, VPN, etc</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does you company feel about keeping it 's money in outside banks ? This is a nice piece of rhetoric , but really it 's not the same .
Bank deposits are , to various degrees , guaranteed by the government .
This is possible because money is fungible .
If the money in the bank goes away ( embezzled or whatever ) it can be replaced with other , equivalent money .
If your data goes away it 's gone forever.What 's more , if someone misappropriates your money the damage is strictly limited to the amount of money taken .
Sensitive information is much more powerful and could be used to do any amount of harm.Having said that , I think using Google Docs is not the greatest information security risk in most organizations .
Most companies I 've been involved with think little of using Skype or MSN Messenger for internal communication , send important passwords via email and have no protection against employees taking data outside the firewall via USB stick , laptop , VPN , etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does you company feel about keeping it's money in outside banks?This is a nice piece of rhetoric, but really it's not the same.
Bank deposits are, to various degrees, guaranteed by the government.
This is possible because money is fungible.
If the money in the bank goes away (embezzled or whatever) it can be replaced with other, equivalent money.
If your data goes away it's gone forever.What's more, if someone misappropriates your money the damage is strictly limited to the amount of money taken.
Sensitive information is much more powerful and could be used to do any amount of harm.Having said that, I think using Google Docs is not the greatest information security risk in most organizations.
Most companies I've been involved with think little of using Skype or MSN Messenger for internal communication, send important passwords via email and have no protection against employees taking data outside the firewall via USB stick, laptop, VPN, etc
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638457</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>bestalexguy</author>
	<datestamp>1247161920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.</p></div><p>That's not quite the problem. Instead, to name some:<br>
a) hardware support, with reasonably <b>deterministic</b> installation and management procedures (still playing with ndiswrapper and the likes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...);<br>
b) default fonts which don't suck (Google's financial strength might help here);<br>
c) the power to drive major companies (including some of the banks I work with) to build websites which fully support Linux;<br>
d) <b>one</b> file browser not below Vista's Windows Explorer, not 20 "meetoo" file managers useful only in the CV's of their own developers<br>
Google should start from the frustration one feels when trying to run Google Earth under, say, Ubuntu. If not even Google itself devotes enough energy to development under Linux yet, how can one expect to have a truly usable alternative to Win&amp;Mac in 1 year from now?<br> <br>
P.S. All the people which volunteer their time and skill to make all Linuxes (too many of them) possible do a hell of a good job; unfortunately, not good enough to make Windows unworthy of its couple hundred bucks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.That 's not quite the problem .
Instead , to name some : a ) hardware support , with reasonably deterministic installation and management procedures ( still playing with ndiswrapper and the likes ... ) ; b ) default fonts which do n't suck ( Google 's financial strength might help here ) ; c ) the power to drive major companies ( including some of the banks I work with ) to build websites which fully support Linux ; d ) one file browser not below Vista 's Windows Explorer , not 20 " meetoo " file managers useful only in the CV 's of their own developers Google should start from the frustration one feels when trying to run Google Earth under , say , Ubuntu .
If not even Google itself devotes enough energy to development under Linux yet , how can one expect to have a truly usable alternative to Win&amp;Mac in 1 year from now ?
P.S. All the people which volunteer their time and skill to make all Linuxes ( too many of them ) possible do a hell of a good job ; unfortunately , not good enough to make Windows unworthy of its couple hundred bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.That's not quite the problem.
Instead, to name some:
a) hardware support, with reasonably deterministic installation and management procedures (still playing with ndiswrapper and the likes ...);
b) default fonts which don't suck (Google's financial strength might help here);
c) the power to drive major companies (including some of the banks I work with) to build websites which fully support Linux;
d) one file browser not below Vista's Windows Explorer, not 20 "meetoo" file managers useful only in the CV's of their own developers
Google should start from the frustration one feels when trying to run Google Earth under, say, Ubuntu.
If not even Google itself devotes enough energy to development under Linux yet, how can one expect to have a truly usable alternative to Win&amp;Mac in 1 year from now?
P.S. All the people which volunteer their time and skill to make all Linuxes (too many of them) possible do a hell of a good job; unfortunately, not good enough to make Windows unworthy of its couple hundred bucks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638319</id>
	<title>Microsoft's move</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1247161440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long will it be before one or more of the Asian manufacturers announces they're pulling out of the deal?  Microsoft will be applying HEAVY pressure, just like they did with the original netbooks.  Want to keep shipping your regular laptops with Vista on them?  Stop shipping ChromeOS netbooks.  It's really hard for these companies to stand up to that, when regular laptops are still both their best sellers and their best margin products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long will it be before one or more of the Asian manufacturers announces they 're pulling out of the deal ?
Microsoft will be applying HEAVY pressure , just like they did with the original netbooks .
Want to keep shipping your regular laptops with Vista on them ?
Stop shipping ChromeOS netbooks .
It 's really hard for these companies to stand up to that , when regular laptops are still both their best sellers and their best margin products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long will it be before one or more of the Asian manufacturers announces they're pulling out of the deal?
Microsoft will be applying HEAVY pressure, just like they did with the original netbooks.
Want to keep shipping your regular laptops with Vista on them?
Stop shipping ChromeOS netbooks.
It's really hard for these companies to stand up to that, when regular laptops are still both their best sellers and their best margin products.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642345</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>Bob The Cowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1247134440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486Dx</p></div></blockquote><p>Wow, hold a grudge much?  You don't suppose the quality of their products has changed much in the last 15 years?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486DxWow , hold a grudge much ?
You do n't suppose the quality of their products has changed much in the last 15 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486DxWow, hold a grudge much?
You don't suppose the quality of their products has changed much in the last 15 years?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28650489</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Ken Erfourth</author>
	<datestamp>1247243400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis. Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.</p></div></blockquote><p> And YOU are the last person Google is trying to get as a user for the Chrome OS. You're already in the Open Source boat, and in fact, you're helping row!</p><p>
Google can make a big difference if they provide a lightweight OS that runs on cheap equipment and gets the user decent Web functionality. Get their email(GMail), their Facebook, their YouTube and their free Flash games. And get all the advertising that goes with it. </p><p>
Maybe even write some papers and share photos with friends (store said content in the Cloud and never lose their stuff). </p><p>
Currently, Charter Communications (Boo!) a big Evil ISP, doesn't even support Windows 98se, Windows Millenium, and Windows 2000 computers. They don't support Mac OS9 or Linux either. If one of their customers calls up their tech support for any of these operating systems, they say "Sorry, not supported, can't help you". </p><p>
Even though every one of these OSs are perfectly capable of connecting to Charter's high-speed connections and using their POP email clients. I set em' up all the time. Works great.</p><p>
But ask Charter and they say "Sorry, not supported. Click."</p><p>
Chrome OS, from Google, and with a simple set of instructions for email and ISP connections (phone droid scripts) instantly gets over this major hurdle for computer doofuses (Gawd luv em'). A single Chrome OS, based on Linux, can be the gold standard for the unwashed masses, that gets them out of the clutches of Micro$oft and $teve Jobs (for case designers) (BTW, I luv Steve, have used Apples since the Apple II, and own Apple stock--but a lot of folks resist giving up the coin needed to get that first Apple computer).</p><p>
If Google pulls off a lightweight OS with the core functionality "the folks" need, that can run on the cheap hardware that is currently choking our landfills, it will be huge. HHHUUUUUUUUUGGGGGEEEE! {/Donald Trump}</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use the * buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis .
Unless this offers any real advantage I wo n't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it .
And YOU are the last person Google is trying to get as a user for the Chrome OS .
You 're already in the Open Source boat , and in fact , you 're helping row !
Google can make a big difference if they provide a lightweight OS that runs on cheap equipment and gets the user decent Web functionality .
Get their email ( GMail ) , their Facebook , their YouTube and their free Flash games .
And get all the advertising that goes with it .
Maybe even write some papers and share photos with friends ( store said content in the Cloud and never lose their stuff ) .
Currently , Charter Communications ( Boo !
) a big Evil ISP , does n't even support Windows 98se , Windows Millenium , and Windows 2000 computers .
They do n't support Mac OS9 or Linux either .
If one of their customers calls up their tech support for any of these operating systems , they say " Sorry , not supported , ca n't help you " .
Even though every one of these OSs are perfectly capable of connecting to Charter 's high-speed connections and using their POP email clients .
I set em ' up all the time .
Works great .
But ask Charter and they say " Sorry , not supported .
Click. " Chrome OS , from Google , and with a simple set of instructions for email and ISP connections ( phone droid scripts ) instantly gets over this major hurdle for computer doofuses ( Gawd luv em ' ) .
A single Chrome OS , based on Linux , can be the gold standard for the unwashed masses , that gets them out of the clutches of Micro $ oft and $ teve Jobs ( for case designers ) ( BTW , I luv Steve , have used Apples since the Apple II , and own Apple stock--but a lot of folks resist giving up the coin needed to get that first Apple computer ) .
If Google pulls off a lightweight OS with the core functionality " the folks " need , that can run on the cheap hardware that is currently choking our landfills , it will be huge .
HHHUUUUUUUUUGGGGGEEEE ! { /Donald Trump }</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis.
Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.
And YOU are the last person Google is trying to get as a user for the Chrome OS.
You're already in the Open Source boat, and in fact, you're helping row!
Google can make a big difference if they provide a lightweight OS that runs on cheap equipment and gets the user decent Web functionality.
Get their email(GMail), their Facebook, their YouTube and their free Flash games.
And get all the advertising that goes with it.
Maybe even write some papers and share photos with friends (store said content in the Cloud and never lose their stuff).
Currently, Charter Communications (Boo!
) a big Evil ISP, doesn't even support Windows 98se, Windows Millenium, and Windows 2000 computers.
They don't support Mac OS9 or Linux either.
If one of their customers calls up their tech support for any of these operating systems, they say "Sorry, not supported, can't help you".
Even though every one of these OSs are perfectly capable of connecting to Charter's high-speed connections and using their POP email clients.
I set em' up all the time.
Works great.
But ask Charter and they say "Sorry, not supported.
Click."
Chrome OS, from Google, and with a simple set of instructions for email and ISP connections (phone droid scripts) instantly gets over this major hurdle for computer doofuses (Gawd luv em').
A single Chrome OS, based on Linux, can be the gold standard for the unwashed masses, that gets them out of the clutches of Micro$oft and $teve Jobs (for case designers) (BTW, I luv Steve, have used Apples since the Apple II, and own Apple stock--but a lot of folks resist giving up the coin needed to get that first Apple computer).
If Google pulls off a lightweight OS with the core functionality "the folks" need, that can run on the cheap hardware that is currently choking our landfills, it will be huge.
HHHUUUUUUUUUGGGGGEEEE! {/Donald Trump}
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638467</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>RedK</author>
	<datestamp>1247161980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which X11 implementation are you talking about ?  TinyX ?  OpenWin ?  Hummingbird Exceed ?  X.org ?  XFree86 ?</p><p>What suckage are you speaking of ?  Is it protocol level ?  Implementation level ?  Extensions ?</p><p>Do you even know what you're talking about ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which X11 implementation are you talking about ?
TinyX ?
OpenWin ?
Hummingbird Exceed ?
X.org ?
XFree86 ? What suckage are you speaking of ?
Is it protocol level ?
Implementation level ?
Extensions ? Do you even know what you 're talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which X11 implementation are you talking about ?
TinyX ?
OpenWin ?
Hummingbird Exceed ?
X.org ?
XFree86 ?What suckage are you speaking of ?
Is it protocol level ?
Implementation level ?
Extensions ?Do you even know what you're talking about ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638613</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1247162640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested, unproven platform with an unknown number of users</p></div><p>I don't think people are understanding what Google is likely planning to do. Whether or not apps are ported to their OS is probably not of interest to them - they're really focusing on cloud computing, with very little happening on your local device other than rendering.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested , unproven platform with an unknown number of usersI do n't think people are understanding what Google is likely planning to do .
Whether or not apps are ported to their OS is probably not of interest to them - they 're really focusing on cloud computing , with very little happening on your local device other than rendering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested, unproven platform with an unknown number of usersI don't think people are understanding what Google is likely planning to do.
Whether or not apps are ported to their OS is probably not of interest to them - they're really focusing on cloud computing, with very little happening on your local device other than rendering.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</id>
	<title>I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1247147940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just today, I gave a presentation created with Google Docs. WIth the right background and font colors, it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template. Combining all the Google stuff together and you have a situation where you hardly need local storage. So, I'd give the Chrome OS a hearty welcome, even though it might offer too much limitations for others. I've given up my office suite, my IMAP and SMTP server and my webmail. For me personally, it's perfectly usable in business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just today , I gave a presentation created with Google Docs .
WIth the right background and font colors , it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template .
Combining all the Google stuff together and you have a situation where you hardly need local storage .
So , I 'd give the Chrome OS a hearty welcome , even though it might offer too much limitations for others .
I 've given up my office suite , my IMAP and SMTP server and my webmail .
For me personally , it 's perfectly usable in business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just today, I gave a presentation created with Google Docs.
WIth the right background and font colors, it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template.
Combining all the Google stuff together and you have a situation where you hardly need local storage.
So, I'd give the Chrome OS a hearty welcome, even though it might offer too much limitations for others.
I've given up my office suite, my IMAP and SMTP server and my webmail.
For me personally, it's perfectly usable in business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636371</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>10Ghz</author>
	<datestamp>1247153520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it seems to me that the Dell-netbooks are solidly built with good design, whereas those cheap as hell Asuses and Acers look and feel like cheap plastic toys. So those Dells might be "overpriced" in the same sense as Toyotas's are "overpriced" when compared to Hyundais. The features might be more or less the same, but Hyundais feel like they are about to fall apart right there and then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it seems to me that the Dell-netbooks are solidly built with good design , whereas those cheap as hell Asuses and Acers look and feel like cheap plastic toys .
So those Dells might be " overpriced " in the same sense as Toyotas 's are " overpriced " when compared to Hyundais .
The features might be more or less the same , but Hyundais feel like they are about to fall apart right there and then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it seems to me that the Dell-netbooks are solidly built with good design, whereas those cheap as hell Asuses and Acers look and feel like cheap plastic toys.
So those Dells might be "overpriced" in the same sense as Toyotas's are "overpriced" when compared to Hyundais.
The features might be more or less the same, but Hyundais feel like they are about to fall apart right there and then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</id>
	<title>Air</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1247147760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way."</p></div><p>I am thinking more among the lines of Adobe AIR and seamlessly linking the Google OS platform with the AIR API.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe , which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way .
" I am thinking more among the lines of Adobe AIR and seamlessly linking the Google OS platform with the AIR API .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.
"I am thinking more among the lines of Adobe AIR and seamlessly linking the Google OS platform with the AIR API.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639639</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>DuckDodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1247166540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most of the laptops people buy come from Compal (Dell, Toshiba, HP) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compal\_Electronics" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compal\_Electronics</a> [wikipedia.org] and Quanta (Acer, Apple, Compaq, Dell again, Toshiba again, HP again, Lenovo, Sony) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta\_Computers" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta\_Computers</a> [wikipedia.org]. <br> <br>
So don't get too caught up in which manufacturer is better.  Pay attention to value for dollar and service (ha!), the hardware is shared.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the laptops people buy come from Compal ( Dell , Toshiba , HP ) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compal \ _Electronics [ wikipedia.org ] and Quanta ( Acer , Apple , Compaq , Dell again , Toshiba again , HP again , Lenovo , Sony ) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta \ _Computers [ wikipedia.org ] .
So do n't get too caught up in which manufacturer is better .
Pay attention to value for dollar and service ( ha !
) , the hardware is shared .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the laptops people buy come from Compal (Dell, Toshiba, HP) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compal\_Electronics [wikipedia.org] and Quanta (Acer, Apple, Compaq, Dell again, Toshiba again, HP again, Lenovo, Sony) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta\_Computers [wikipedia.org].
So don't get too caught up in which manufacturer is better.
Pay attention to value for dollar and service (ha!
), the hardware is shared.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28649197</id>
	<title>No, your post is the FUD.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1247238480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is easily demonstrable that most people have a pleasant experience  with Ubuntu.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is easily demonstrable that most people have a pleasant experience with Ubuntu .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is easily demonstrable that most people have a pleasant experience  with Ubuntu.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403</id>
	<title>People Failing To Grasp Chrome Just Like Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One just has to look at the silly posts back when Android was announced and all the inane and irrelevant garbage spewed about the goddamn iPhone and if Android was an 'iPhone killer'.</p><p>With every major cellphone maker coming out with Android phones and demoing their custom interfaces and software built on top of Android and Windows Mobile virtually forgotten about, you would think people would wise up and grasp how huge this move by Google is into the netbook market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One just has to look at the silly posts back when Android was announced and all the inane and irrelevant garbage spewed about the goddamn iPhone and if Android was an 'iPhone killer'.With every major cellphone maker coming out with Android phones and demoing their custom interfaces and software built on top of Android and Windows Mobile virtually forgotten about , you would think people would wise up and grasp how huge this move by Google is into the netbook market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One just has to look at the silly posts back when Android was announced and all the inane and irrelevant garbage spewed about the goddamn iPhone and if Android was an 'iPhone killer'.With every major cellphone maker coming out with Android phones and demoing their custom interfaces and software built on top of Android and Windows Mobile virtually forgotten about, you would think people would wise up and grasp how huge this move by Google is into the netbook market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642033</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1247133060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There could be a few nice indirect benefits. Google, a company with plenty of financial weight to throw around will be "urging" hardware vendors to make sure there are good drivers available for the Linux kernel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There could be a few nice indirect benefits .
Google , a company with plenty of financial weight to throw around will be " urging " hardware vendors to make sure there are good drivers available for the Linux kernel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There could be a few nice indirect benefits.
Google, a company with plenty of financial weight to throw around will be "urging" hardware vendors to make sure there are good drivers available for the Linux kernel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643243</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone actually RTFA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247137980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, TFA doesn't list them, but they did link to <a href="http://chrome.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-chrome-os-faq.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">the page that does</a> [blogspot.com].</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What companies is Google working with to support Google Chrome OS?<br>The Google Chrome OS team is currently working with a number of technology companies to design and build devices that deliver an extraordinary end user experience. Among others, these companies include Acer, Adobe, ASUS, Freescale, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments, and Toshiba.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , TFA does n't list them , but they did link to the page that does [ blogspot.com ] .What companies is Google working with to support Google Chrome OS ? The Google Chrome OS team is currently working with a number of technology companies to design and build devices that deliver an extraordinary end user experience .
Among others , these companies include Acer , Adobe , ASUS , Freescale , Hewlett-Packard , Lenovo , Qualcomm , Texas Instruments , and Toshiba .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, TFA doesn't list them, but they did link to the page that does [blogspot.com].What companies is Google working with to support Google Chrome OS?The Google Chrome OS team is currently working with a number of technology companies to design and build devices that deliver an extraordinary end user experience.
Among others, these companies include Acer, Adobe, ASUS, Freescale, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments, and Toshiba.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</id>
	<title>Marketing.....</title>
	<author>ITJC68</author>
	<datestamp>1247147880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this just smoke and mirrors. From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end. Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes. I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis. Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this just smoke and mirrors .
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end .
Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes .
I use the * buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis .
Unless this offers any real advantage I wo n't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this just smoke and mirrors.
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.
Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes.
I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis.
Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641067</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247171940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, I bet a month after that Chrome OS comes out, someone will have the Google custom stuff packaged up into the GUI part and other parts, for you to install as you please, parallel and integrating into your normal GUI.</p><p>I'll just look for the Gentoo Portage overlay in layman.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I bet a month after that Chrome OS comes out , someone will have the Google custom stuff packaged up into the GUI part and other parts , for you to install as you please , parallel and integrating into your normal GUI.I 'll just look for the Gentoo Portage overlay in layman .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I bet a month after that Chrome OS comes out, someone will have the Google custom stuff packaged up into the GUI part and other parts, for you to install as you please, parallel and integrating into your normal GUI.I'll just look for the Gentoo Portage overlay in layman.
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641527</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247130660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yum install gnash-plugin</p><p>http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yum install gnash-pluginhttp : //www.gnu.org/software/gnash/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yum install gnash-pluginhttp://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635775</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247151240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. Essentially for RIA's they're limited to AIR, Silverlight and JavaFX. Somehow I think Silverlight from MS didn't figure in their plans, JavaFX is Suns and pretty new, so the only logical choice would be AIR (sonce adobe probably competes less directly with google)</p><p>Technically, since according to google, "for the developer, the web is the platform" (or something like that) it shouldn't really make a difference - a website is a website is a website... I think  it doesn't sound good - almost like devs are going to be boxed in to using certain SDKs to build apps(kind of like MS?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) )</p><p>From personal experience, "Adobe" and "free and open" seldom go together (just look at how they treat the PDF spec). I'm very interested to see how this will pan out, but right now it looks like they are in such a rush to get this out that they are just "partnering" with various players so they can cobble together all the ready made bits and pieces and end up with an OS (or a steaming ad-infested pile of faeces).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
Essentially for RIA 's they 're limited to AIR , Silverlight and JavaFX .
Somehow I think Silverlight from MS did n't figure in their plans , JavaFX is Suns and pretty new , so the only logical choice would be AIR ( sonce adobe probably competes less directly with google ) Technically , since according to google , " for the developer , the web is the platform " ( or something like that ) it should n't really make a difference - a website is a website is a website... I think it does n't sound good - almost like devs are going to be boxed in to using certain SDKs to build apps ( kind of like MS ?
: ) ) From personal experience , " Adobe " and " free and open " seldom go together ( just look at how they treat the PDF spec ) .
I 'm very interested to see how this will pan out , but right now it looks like they are in such a rush to get this out that they are just " partnering " with various players so they can cobble together all the ready made bits and pieces and end up with an OS ( or a steaming ad-infested pile of faeces ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
Essentially for RIA's they're limited to AIR, Silverlight and JavaFX.
Somehow I think Silverlight from MS didn't figure in their plans, JavaFX is Suns and pretty new, so the only logical choice would be AIR (sonce adobe probably competes less directly with google)Technically, since according to google, "for the developer, the web is the platform" (or something like that) it shouldn't really make a difference - a website is a website is a website... I think  it doesn't sound good - almost like devs are going to be boxed in to using certain SDKs to build apps(kind of like MS?
:) )From personal experience, "Adobe" and "free and open" seldom go together (just look at how they treat the PDF spec).
I'm very interested to see how this will pan out, but right now it looks like they are in such a rush to get this out that they are just "partnering" with various players so they can cobble together all the ready made bits and pieces and end up with an OS (or a steaming ad-infested pile of faeces).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638323</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>RedK</author>
	<datestamp>1247161500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except you can strip everything you listed.  Then you're left with the Linux KERNEL and you can now place whatever you want on top. Your post is nothing but an ignorant rant.  For all we know, they could use BusyBox + DirectFB + custom desktop environment and you wouldn't know where the coupling even starts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except you can strip everything you listed .
Then you 're left with the Linux KERNEL and you can now place whatever you want on top .
Your post is nothing but an ignorant rant .
For all we know , they could use BusyBox + DirectFB + custom desktop environment and you would n't know where the coupling even starts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except you can strip everything you listed.
Then you're left with the Linux KERNEL and you can now place whatever you want on top.
Your post is nothing but an ignorant rant.
For all we know, they could use BusyBox + DirectFB + custom desktop environment and you wouldn't know where the coupling even starts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647737</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1247228760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it? Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part doesn't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro.</p></div><p>Well, it won't come with X11 but use its own windowing system. As far as GUIs go this will cut out quite a few of "normal" Linux apps...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it ?
Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part does n't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro.Well , it wo n't come with X11 but use its own windowing system .
As far as GUIs go this will cut out quite a few of " normal " Linux apps.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it?
Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part doesn't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro.Well, it won't come with X11 but use its own windowing system.
As far as GUIs go this will cut out quite a few of "normal" Linux apps...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247150400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dell's netbooks are overpriced anyway. Seriously, I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus, acer, et. al.</p></div><p>I do not know about Dell, but Acer machines have the fame of being completely craptastic. I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486Dx which had very crappy cases that  seemed more like bad quality lego's. Or the other "stylish" black computers which were a completely piece of shit. I think Acer lack of quality may be only surpassed by that of Sony (which, may not be as bad due to quality but more because of the use of al lthose close formats)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell 's netbooks are overpriced anyway .
Seriously , I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus , acer , et .
al.I do not know about Dell , but Acer machines have the fame of being completely craptastic .
I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486Dx which had very crappy cases that seemed more like bad quality lego 's .
Or the other " stylish " black computers which were a completely piece of shit .
I think Acer lack of quality may be only surpassed by that of Sony ( which , may not be as bad due to quality but more because of the use of al lthose close formats )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell's netbooks are overpriced anyway.
Seriously, I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus, acer, et.
al.I do not know about Dell, but Acer machines have the fame of being completely craptastic.
I stopped using/trusting Acer computer after having to provide service to 486Dx which had very crappy cases that  seemed more like bad quality lego's.
Or the other "stylish" black computers which were a completely piece of shit.
I think Acer lack of quality may be only surpassed by that of Sony (which, may not be as bad due to quality but more because of the use of al lthose close formats)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637175</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>DuckDodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1247156280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds great.  Get to work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds great .
Get to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds great.
Get to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643119</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1247137500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's Google, I doubt the user interface is going to be exciting. Every Google interface I've seen looks very plain. And while it's good for them, to be partnering with big computer manufacturers and Adobe, I think they'd be head over heels above every other Linux distribution if they could partner with
Canon, Epson, and HP to get good printer support.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's Google , I doubt the user interface is going to be exciting .
Every Google interface I 've seen looks very plain .
And while it 's good for them , to be partnering with big computer manufacturers and Adobe , I think they 'd be head over heels above every other Linux distribution if they could partner with Canon , Epson , and HP to get good printer support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's Google, I doubt the user interface is going to be exciting.
Every Google interface I've seen looks very plain.
And while it's good for them, to be partnering with big computer manufacturers and Adobe, I think they'd be head over heels above every other Linux distribution if they could partner with
Canon, Epson, and HP to get good printer support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635877</id>
	<title>Re:Google is not making an OS...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247151720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah right, and Apple didn't make an OS, it was just a "windowing environment for Next".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah right , and Apple did n't make an OS , it was just a " windowing environment for Next " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah right, and Apple didn't make an OS, it was just a "windowing environment for Next".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638837</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>CFBMoo1</author>
	<datestamp>1247163600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd have a great laugh if they included a "Duke Nuke'm Forever (BETA)" game with the new OS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have a great laugh if they included a " Duke Nuke 'm Forever ( BETA ) " game with the new OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have a great laugh if they included a "Duke Nuke'm Forever (BETA)" game with the new OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642419</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247134740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long was Chrome in beta again? I can't remember....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long was Chrome in beta again ?
I ca n't remember... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long was Chrome in beta again?
I can't remember....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635421</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1247149620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a linux kernel, not necessarily a distribution in any meaningful sense.  They could simplify it to the linux kernel, loader, some libraries, and chrome executable.  I suppose they would need a shell, scripts, and helper apps for network config and dhcp, but For a browser-based internet device, 99\% of a standard linux distro is irrelevant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a linux kernel , not necessarily a distribution in any meaningful sense .
They could simplify it to the linux kernel , loader , some libraries , and chrome executable .
I suppose they would need a shell , scripts , and helper apps for network config and dhcp , but For a browser-based internet device , 99 \ % of a standard linux distro is irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a linux kernel, not necessarily a distribution in any meaningful sense.
They could simplify it to the linux kernel, loader, some libraries, and chrome executable.
I suppose they would need a shell, scripts, and helper apps for network config and dhcp, but For a browser-based internet device, 99\% of a standard linux distro is irrelevant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636057</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>minasoko</author>
	<datestamp>1247152440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, and Google would miss out on the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.01\% of their target market that you and others like you represent.<br> <br>In all probability, ChromeOS will not be for you, it seems to be aimed at the gigantic majority who do not give a stuff what a 'distro' is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and Google would miss out on the .01 \ % of their target market that you and others like you represent .
In all probability , ChromeOS will not be for you , it seems to be aimed at the gigantic majority who do not give a stuff what a 'distro ' is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and Google would miss out on the .01\% of their target market that you and others like you represent.
In all probability, ChromeOS will not be for you, it seems to be aimed at the gigantic majority who do not give a stuff what a 'distro' is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647587</id>
	<title>Re:Will Chrome OS be any different...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247226300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That uses a lot of Citrix connectivity.... might as well just run a terminal server.  Check out EyeOS.... I think that might be closer to ChromeOS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That uses a lot of Citrix connectivity.... might as well just run a terminal server .
Check out EyeOS.... I think that might be closer to ChromeOS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That uses a lot of Citrix connectivity.... might as well just run a terminal server.
Check out EyeOS.... I think that might be closer to ChromeOS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639505</id>
	<title>Re:2010 will be the year of Linux</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1247166120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... (beta)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... ( beta )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... (beta)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does your company feel about you keeping the presentation data on Google servers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does your company feel about you keeping the presentation data on Google servers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does your company feel about you keeping the presentation data on Google servers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638933</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>mounthood</author>
	<datestamp>1247163900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google is redefining the rules: by doing less they're competing with Windows, even though ChromeOS and Windows don't have the same objectives or standards [insert joke]. Stability, security and hardware support are the only objectives for ChromeOS, not running a million legacy applications like Windows try's to do. Both will still be judged as operating systems, but only Windows will be carrying the legacy baggage. Either Windows 7 will be so cut down that it doesn't do legacy, or it'll be much larger and have more issues, need more patches, etc...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is redefining the rules : by doing less they 're competing with Windows , even though ChromeOS and Windows do n't have the same objectives or standards [ insert joke ] .
Stability , security and hardware support are the only objectives for ChromeOS , not running a million legacy applications like Windows try 's to do .
Both will still be judged as operating systems , but only Windows will be carrying the legacy baggage .
Either Windows 7 will be so cut down that it does n't do legacy , or it 'll be much larger and have more issues , need more patches , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is redefining the rules: by doing less they're competing with Windows, even though ChromeOS and Windows don't have the same objectives or standards [insert joke].
Stability, security and hardware support are the only objectives for ChromeOS, not running a million legacy applications like Windows try's to do.
Both will still be judged as operating systems, but only Windows will be carrying the legacy baggage.
Either Windows 7 will be so cut down that it doesn't do legacy, or it'll be much larger and have more issues, need more patches, etc...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641109</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>siloko</author>
	<datestamp>1247172120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're saying "it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template" <strong>like it's English</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're saying " it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template " like it 's English</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're saying "it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template" like it's English</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639677</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>forkazoo</author>
	<datestamp>1247166660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is this just smoke and mirrors. From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end. Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes. I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis. Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.</p></div></blockquote><p>Android technically uses a Linux kernel, too.  But you can't really tell as an app developer that it is Linux.  You are very far removed from the kernel on Android, so it could just as well have been build with almost any kernel.  Mac OS X sort of uses a BSD kernel.  But, Mac OS X is a different OS from FreeBSD in every way that actually matters to anybody.  It presents itself as a lot more traditionally UNIX like than Android does, but that isn't saying a lot.  It uses frameworks, considers Objective C to be the 1st class language for app development, and doesn't support X11 out of the box.</p><p>Until we know more about Chrome OS, we can't really be sure if this is really just another Linux distro with a new coat of paint, or if it is going to be something completely foreign that technically uses a very familiar kernel under the hood.  For all Google has said about "reinventing what an OS should be," I'm expecting something that behaves more like an appliance that a full Linux distro.  Think Tivo.  Those are Linux boxes, too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this just smoke and mirrors .
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end .
Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes .
I use the * buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis .
Unless this offers any real advantage I wo n't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.Android technically uses a Linux kernel , too .
But you ca n't really tell as an app developer that it is Linux .
You are very far removed from the kernel on Android , so it could just as well have been build with almost any kernel .
Mac OS X sort of uses a BSD kernel .
But , Mac OS X is a different OS from FreeBSD in every way that actually matters to anybody .
It presents itself as a lot more traditionally UNIX like than Android does , but that is n't saying a lot .
It uses frameworks , considers Objective C to be the 1st class language for app development , and does n't support X11 out of the box.Until we know more about Chrome OS , we ca n't really be sure if this is really just another Linux distro with a new coat of paint , or if it is going to be something completely foreign that technically uses a very familiar kernel under the hood .
For all Google has said about " reinventing what an OS should be , " I 'm expecting something that behaves more like an appliance that a full Linux distro .
Think Tivo .
Those are Linux boxes , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this just smoke and mirrors.
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.
Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from will probably dictate how far it goes.
I use the *buntu and Suse variants of Linux on a daily basis.
Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.Android technically uses a Linux kernel, too.
But you can't really tell as an app developer that it is Linux.
You are very far removed from the kernel on Android, so it could just as well have been build with almost any kernel.
Mac OS X sort of uses a BSD kernel.
But, Mac OS X is a different OS from FreeBSD in every way that actually matters to anybody.
It presents itself as a lot more traditionally UNIX like than Android does, but that isn't saying a lot.
It uses frameworks, considers Objective C to be the 1st class language for app development, and doesn't support X11 out of the box.Until we know more about Chrome OS, we can't really be sure if this is really just another Linux distro with a new coat of paint, or if it is going to be something completely foreign that technically uses a very familiar kernel under the hood.
For all Google has said about "reinventing what an OS should be," I'm expecting something that behaves more like an appliance that a full Linux distro.
Think Tivo.
Those are Linux boxes, too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638629</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe</title>
	<author>spitzak</author>
	<datestamp>1247162700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Google controls Youtube they could easily make it send the video in their own format, no flash involved, when talking to ChromeOS. Same thing as the iPhone does. So the fact that they own Youtube makes the desire for flash support *less*, not more.</p><p>I am somewhat doubtful that flash support can be improved. I suspect the original code is a mess and in fact Adobe is trying fairly hard. If Adobe was ignoring Linux there would not be anything that worked at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Google controls Youtube they could easily make it send the video in their own format , no flash involved , when talking to ChromeOS .
Same thing as the iPhone does .
So the fact that they own Youtube makes the desire for flash support * less * , not more.I am somewhat doubtful that flash support can be improved .
I suspect the original code is a mess and in fact Adobe is trying fairly hard .
If Adobe was ignoring Linux there would not be anything that worked at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Google controls Youtube they could easily make it send the video in their own format, no flash involved, when talking to ChromeOS.
Same thing as the iPhone does.
So the fact that they own Youtube makes the desire for flash support *less*, not more.I am somewhat doubtful that flash support can be improved.
I suspect the original code is a mess and in fact Adobe is trying fairly hard.
If Adobe was ignoring Linux there would not be anything that worked at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635555</id>
	<title>Re:People Failing To Grasp Chrome Just Like Androi</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247150280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry - in a year or two, Apple will finally release a netbook, and then we can hear people branding Google OS as being "An Apple nEtbOok [or whatever it'll be called] killer".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry - in a year or two , Apple will finally release a netbook , and then we can hear people branding Google OS as being " An Apple nEtbOok [ or whatever it 'll be called ] killer " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry - in a year or two, Apple will finally release a netbook, and then we can hear people branding Google OS as being "An Apple nEtbOok [or whatever it'll be called] killer".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201</id>
	<title>Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1247148420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dell's netbooks are overpriced anyway. Seriously, I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus, acer, et. al.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell 's netbooks are overpriced anyway .
Seriously , I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus , acer , et .
al .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell's netbooks are overpriced anyway.
Seriously, I went shopping for one recently and their netbooks seemed crazy expensive compared to asus, acer, et.
al.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635881</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1247151720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, getting flash working on 64 bit linux is even easier than getting google gears working. (Incidentally, anyone else notice that gears STILL isn't out for FF3.5? Their excuse for not doing testing during the RC is that they'd have to make too many builds. Fail, fail, fail. Also, STILL no gears for 64 bit linux, you have to get a third party xpi every time there's an update. Fail, fail, FAIL!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , getting flash working on 64 bit linux is even easier than getting google gears working .
( Incidentally , anyone else notice that gears STILL is n't out for FF3.5 ?
Their excuse for not doing testing during the RC is that they 'd have to make too many builds .
Fail , fail , fail .
Also , STILL no gears for 64 bit linux , you have to get a third party xpi every time there 's an update .
Fail , fail , FAIL !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, getting flash working on 64 bit linux is even easier than getting google gears working.
(Incidentally, anyone else notice that gears STILL isn't out for FF3.5?
Their excuse for not doing testing during the RC is that they'd have to make too many builds.
Fail, fail, fail.
Also, STILL no gears for 64 bit linux, you have to get a third party xpi every time there's an update.
Fail, fail, FAIL!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</id>
	<title>Noooo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247147580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anything but Acrobat, king of the bloatware!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything but Acrobat , king of the bloatware !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything but Acrobat, king of the bloatware!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640265</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>JayJay.br</author>
	<datestamp>1247168880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on, at least try posting a car analogy!!~</p><p>How does your company feel about keeping cars in third-party parking lots?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , at least try posting a car analogy !
! ~ How does your company feel about keeping cars in third-party parking lots ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, at least try posting a car analogy!
!~How does your company feel about keeping cars in third-party parking lots?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638909</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1247163780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least those systems should have decent driver support right from the start. That's good enough for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least those systems should have decent driver support right from the start .
That 's good enough for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least those systems should have decent driver support right from the start.
That's good enough for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642595</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247135280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We think this because google is a web service provider. Therefore we assume that their "distro" will be tailored for exactly that: web services. With a heavily tailored kernel, and possibly tailored libraries. And no local apps: they don't want you to run abiword, they want you to run google docs. Why run a local calculator when we have a nice webapp. Furthermore, every bit they cut out is a bit they don't have to support. Also they don't give a rats ass about microsofts desktop market share, they care about the default ie with the default msn and the default bing. If it means creating an os to control the defaults, then so be it.</p><p>Partnering with adobe is a no brainer: google own youtube, youtube runs on flash, flash on linux sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We think this because google is a web service provider .
Therefore we assume that their " distro " will be tailored for exactly that : web services .
With a heavily tailored kernel , and possibly tailored libraries .
And no local apps : they do n't want you to run abiword , they want you to run google docs .
Why run a local calculator when we have a nice webapp .
Furthermore , every bit they cut out is a bit they do n't have to support .
Also they do n't give a rats ass about microsofts desktop market share , they care about the default ie with the default msn and the default bing .
If it means creating an os to control the defaults , then so be it.Partnering with adobe is a no brainer : google own youtube , youtube runs on flash , flash on linux sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We think this because google is a web service provider.
Therefore we assume that their "distro" will be tailored for exactly that: web services.
With a heavily tailored kernel, and possibly tailored libraries.
And no local apps: they don't want you to run abiword, they want you to run google docs.
Why run a local calculator when we have a nice webapp.
Furthermore, every bit they cut out is a bit they don't have to support.
Also they don't give a rats ass about microsofts desktop market share, they care about the default ie with the default msn and the default bing.
If it means creating an os to control the defaults, then so be it.Partnering with adobe is a no brainer: google own youtube, youtube runs on flash, flash on linux sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025</id>
	<title>Did anyone actually RTFA?</title>
	<author>sjvn</author>
	<datestamp>1247152320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is \_no\_ news here about who the partners will be. It's just a day-late write-up of the original Google Chrome announcement. This should never have been published as 'news' this late in the game much less Slashdotted.</p><p>Steven</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is \ _no \ _ news here about who the partners will be .
It 's just a day-late write-up of the original Google Chrome announcement .
This should never have been published as 'news ' this late in the game much less Slashdotted.Steven</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is \_no\_ news here about who the partners will be.
It's just a day-late write-up of the original Google Chrome announcement.
This should never have been published as 'news' this late in the game much less Slashdotted.Steven</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427</id>
	<title>WTF, Google. You're teaming up w/Adobe, too?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.</p></div><p>First off, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if anyone is teaming up with Adobe to include Adobe web stuff that it's not going to focus on <em>Acrobat</em> but on <em>Adobe Flash, Adobe AIR</em>, and that whole ecosystem.</p><p>That out of the way, what the Flippety Friggery, Google?</p><p>You're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser, which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects. But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/" title="gnu.org">Gnash</a> [gnu.org].</p><p>This seems like a repeat of the situation with the ARM folks. Gnash has had ARM support for several years, but instead of the ARM people collaborating with Gnash to get full Flash support on their processors, the ARM people worked with Adobe to <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1259873&amp;cid=28243671" title="slashdot.org">make a whole new port to ARM</a> [slashdot.org], instead.</p><p>Now Google is working on a slick new OS and has an amazing opportunity to have the whole thing be Free Software. Gnash is getting very mature, and with support from a organization like Google it could easily become the best Flash player on Free OSes, if not on all OSes.</p><p>C'mon Google: Team up with Gnash and other Free Software projects and make Chrome OS one for the history books.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe , which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.First off , I 'm going to go out on a limb and say that if anyone is teaming up with Adobe to include Adobe web stuff that it 's not going to focus on Acrobat but on Adobe Flash , Adobe AIR , and that whole ecosystem.That out of the way , what the Flippety Friggery , Google ? You 're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser , which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects .
But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as Gnash [ gnu.org ] .This seems like a repeat of the situation with the ARM folks .
Gnash has had ARM support for several years , but instead of the ARM people collaborating with Gnash to get full Flash support on their processors , the ARM people worked with Adobe to make a whole new port to ARM [ slashdot.org ] , instead.Now Google is working on a slick new OS and has an amazing opportunity to have the whole thing be Free Software .
Gnash is getting very mature , and with support from a organization like Google it could easily become the best Flash player on Free OSes , if not on all OSes.C'mon Google : Team up with Gnash and other Free Software projects and make Chrome OS one for the history books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe, which could mean Google is looking to include the Acrobat.com web-based software suite in some way.First off, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if anyone is teaming up with Adobe to include Adobe web stuff that it's not going to focus on Acrobat but on Adobe Flash, Adobe AIR, and that whole ecosystem.That out of the way, what the Flippety Friggery, Google?You're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser, which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects.
But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as Gnash [gnu.org].This seems like a repeat of the situation with the ARM folks.
Gnash has had ARM support for several years, but instead of the ARM people collaborating with Gnash to get full Flash support on their processors, the ARM people worked with Adobe to make a whole new port to ARM [slashdot.org], instead.Now Google is working on a slick new OS and has an amazing opportunity to have the whole thing be Free Software.
Gnash is getting very mature, and with support from a organization like Google it could easily become the best Flash player on Free OSes, if not on all OSes.C'mon Google: Team up with Gnash and other Free Software projects and make Chrome OS one for the history books.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651233</id>
	<title>486Dx ?!</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1247246460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>&lt;rolls\_eyes&gt;<br>It is heart warming that some people around here keep themselves well informed about cutting edge technology<br>&lt;/rolls\_eyes&gt;</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is heart warming that some people around here keep themselves well informed about cutting edge technology</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is heart warming that some people around here keep themselves well informed about cutting edge technology</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</id>
	<title>How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1247149320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>For how many years will the Chrome OS stay in beta?
Place your bets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For how many years will the Chrome OS stay in beta ?
Place your bets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For how many years will the Chrome OS stay in beta?
Place your bets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637875</id>
	<title>Security</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1247159400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What really excites me about the new Google Chrome OS is the security aspect.  As Google said on their official blog <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html" title="blogspot.com">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html</a> [blogspot.com]:</p><blockquote><div><p>And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.</p></div></blockquote><p>The Chrome web browser has been a complete revelation in terms of security with a track record of no security problems whatsoever.  Since they are building Chrome OS on top of Linux then "completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS" presumably means redesigning the security architecture of Linux.  Since Linux is GPL then clearly Linus will be able to accept all of Google's changes and redesigns and then Linux will have no security flaws ever again.  I'm quite sure Linus will be delighted to do so.</p><p>It would be such a joy to have an OS that never needs a security update and I'm delighted that Google will implement one.</p><p>Google really are ever so kind and generous in doing this for the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What really excites me about the new Google Chrome OS is the security aspect .
As Google said on their official blog http : //googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html [ blogspot.com ] : And as we did for the Google Chrome browser , we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users do n't have to deal with viruses , malware and security updates .
It should just work.The Chrome web browser has been a complete revelation in terms of security with a track record of no security problems whatsoever .
Since they are building Chrome OS on top of Linux then " completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS " presumably means redesigning the security architecture of Linux .
Since Linux is GPL then clearly Linus will be able to accept all of Google 's changes and redesigns and then Linux will have no security flaws ever again .
I 'm quite sure Linus will be delighted to do so.It would be such a joy to have an OS that never needs a security update and I 'm delighted that Google will implement one.Google really are ever so kind and generous in doing this for the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What really excites me about the new Google Chrome OS is the security aspect.
As Google said on their official blog http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html [blogspot.com]:And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates.
It should just work.The Chrome web browser has been a complete revelation in terms of security with a track record of no security problems whatsoever.
Since they are building Chrome OS on top of Linux then "completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS" presumably means redesigning the security architecture of Linux.
Since Linux is GPL then clearly Linus will be able to accept all of Google's changes and redesigns and then Linux will have no security flaws ever again.
I'm quite sure Linus will be delighted to do so.It would be such a joy to have an OS that never needs a security update and I'm delighted that Google will implement one.Google really are ever so kind and generous in doing this for the world.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637975</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247159940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unless this offers any real advantage</p></div><p>How about this: not a single dollar to Microsoft.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless this offers any real advantageHow about this : not a single dollar to Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless this offers any real advantageHow about this: not a single dollar to Microsoft.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638493</id>
	<title>Ubuntu Netbook Remix</title>
	<author>It's the tripnaut!</author>
	<datestamp>1247162100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I currently run <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu\_Netbook\_Remix" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Ubuntu Netbook Remix</a> [wikipedia.org] on an Acer Aspire One (8GB SSD version).  I have been very happy with it. <br> <br>
The only reason I'm ever gonna move on to the Chrome OS is if I see a serious performance boost over my UNR-powered netbook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I currently run Ubuntu Netbook Remix [ wikipedia.org ] on an Acer Aspire One ( 8GB SSD version ) .
I have been very happy with it .
The only reason I 'm ever gon na move on to the Chrome OS is if I see a serious performance boost over my UNR-powered netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I currently run Ubuntu Netbook Remix [wikipedia.org] on an Acer Aspire One (8GB SSD version).
I have been very happy with it.
The only reason I'm ever gonna move on to the Chrome OS is if I see a serious performance boost over my UNR-powered netbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635173</id>
	<title>Re:Noooo</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1247148240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry, it's probably flash!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , it 's probably flash !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, it's probably flash!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638411</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247161740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Define beta.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Define beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Define beta.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636599</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>LeonN</author>
	<datestamp>1247154240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>/agree, but what about ppc architecture?  still have not been able to get youtube on my playstation 3 to work, or surfthechannel.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(  tried both gnash and swfdec.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/cry          (havent been able to get spotify to work in any capacity aswell, but thats another subject)</htmltext>
<tokenext>/agree , but what about ppc architecture ?
still have not been able to get youtube on my playstation 3 to work , or surfthechannel .
: ( tried both gnash and swfdec .
/cry ( havent been able to get spotify to work in any capacity aswell , but thats another subject )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/agree, but what about ppc architecture?
still have not been able to get youtube on my playstation 3 to work, or surfthechannel.
:(  tried both gnash and swfdec.
/cry          (havent been able to get spotify to work in any capacity aswell, but thats another subject)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1247160000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from, unlike most Linux distros. Hell, they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.</p></div><p>Pure FUD. The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few months (running Linux Mint, at the machine):</p><p>1) ping and dig - and both of those can be done from the GUI, I just prefer the command line.<br>2) Django manage.py commands<br>3) ssh into a remove server<br>4) Restarting lighttpd</p><p>Now, how many of those are things the average user would need to do? All my average user stuff (installing desktop apps, web browsing, email, etc.) gets done without a command prompt in site.</p><p>Just because the sort of people who read Slashdot need to use the command prompt to get stuff done - stuff that most people have never heard of - does not mean the average user will ever see one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from , unlike most Linux distros .
Hell , they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.Pure FUD .
The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few months ( running Linux Mint , at the machine ) : 1 ) ping and dig - and both of those can be done from the GUI , I just prefer the command line.2 ) Django manage.py commands3 ) ssh into a remove server4 ) Restarting lighttpdNow , how many of those are things the average user would need to do ?
All my average user stuff ( installing desktop apps , web browsing , email , etc .
) gets done without a command prompt in site.Just because the sort of people who read Slashdot need to use the command prompt to get stuff done - stuff that most people have never heard of - does not mean the average user will ever see one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from, unlike most Linux distros.
Hell, they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.Pure FUD.
The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few months (running Linux Mint, at the machine):1) ping and dig - and both of those can be done from the GUI, I just prefer the command line.2) Django manage.py commands3) ssh into a remove server4) Restarting lighttpdNow, how many of those are things the average user would need to do?
All my average user stuff (installing desktop apps, web browsing, email, etc.
) gets done without a command prompt in site.Just because the sort of people who read Slashdot need to use the command prompt to get stuff done - stuff that most people have never heard of - does not mean the average user will ever see one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636253</id>
	<title>Hype versus reality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247153220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to wonder if the Chrome OS is going to turn out like Android has so far.  When Android was first announced and also when it was first released, pundits claimed Android phones were going to take over the market, and everyone and their mother supposedly announced they were going to release piles of new Android-based phones.</p><p>And here we are now and in reality there are very few Android phones on the market, and Android phones seems to be largely absent from all the big cellphone shows.</p><p>So I have my doubts that Chrome is going to be the Next Big Thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder if the Chrome OS is going to turn out like Android has so far .
When Android was first announced and also when it was first released , pundits claimed Android phones were going to take over the market , and everyone and their mother supposedly announced they were going to release piles of new Android-based phones.And here we are now and in reality there are very few Android phones on the market , and Android phones seems to be largely absent from all the big cellphone shows.So I have my doubts that Chrome is going to be the Next Big Thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder if the Chrome OS is going to turn out like Android has so far.
When Android was first announced and also when it was first released, pundits claimed Android phones were going to take over the market, and everyone and their mother supposedly announced they were going to release piles of new Android-based phones.And here we are now and in reality there are very few Android phones on the market, and Android phones seems to be largely absent from all the big cellphone shows.So I have my doubts that Chrome is going to be the Next Big Thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637823</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1247159220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it is just that Flash sucks - not Flash on any particular platform.</p><p>I thought that Gnash could handle Youtube? That is what most of us use Flash for.</p><p>Chrome OS is going to be available for ARM, so Google  presumably wants Flash there as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it is just that Flash sucks - not Flash on any particular platform.I thought that Gnash could handle Youtube ?
That is what most of us use Flash for.Chrome OS is going to be available for ARM , so Google presumably wants Flash there as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it is just that Flash sucks - not Flash on any particular platform.I thought that Gnash could handle Youtube?
That is what most of us use Flash for.Chrome OS is going to be available for ARM, so Google  presumably wants Flash there as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637479</id>
	<title>Google, *please* don't screw this up!</title>
	<author>Qbertino</author>
	<datestamp>1247157600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm weary allready. First Android, then a completely differently branded second Linux knockoff. I know Google isn't dependant on making money with their software and OSes projects, but the last thing we need is further market confusion due to Google joining the fray of alternative OSes and distros. I beg that they manage to string Android and this Chrome OS thing into one OS ecosystem and that it will be well standardised and documented.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm weary allready .
First Android , then a completely differently branded second Linux knockoff .
I know Google is n't dependant on making money with their software and OSes projects , but the last thing we need is further market confusion due to Google joining the fray of alternative OSes and distros .
I beg that they manage to string Android and this Chrome OS thing into one OS ecosystem and that it will be well standardised and documented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm weary allready.
First Android, then a completely differently branded second Linux knockoff.
I know Google isn't dependant on making money with their software and OSes projects, but the last thing we need is further market confusion due to Google joining the fray of alternative OSes and distros.
I beg that they manage to string Android and this Chrome OS thing into one OS ecosystem and that it will be well standardised and documented.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637317</id>
	<title>Re:Google is not making an OS...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up, I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now.</p></div><p>...do you even know what FUD stands for, let alone what it means? How does it even apply to this situation?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up , I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now....do you even know what FUD stands for , let alone what it means ?
How does it even apply to this situation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up, I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now....do you even know what FUD stands for, let alone what it means?
How does it even apply to this situation?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651261</id>
	<title>FUD? Which FUD?</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1247246700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you point out which FUD are you refering to, or perhaps you haven't figured out what the initials stand for.?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you point out which FUD are you refering to , or perhaps you have n't figured out what the initials stand for .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you point out which FUD are you refering to, or perhaps you haven't figured out what the initials stand for.
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</id>
	<title>Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247152260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it? Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part doesn't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro. They're not stupid, they'll do what the market wants to eat Microsoft's yummy marketshare, they won't give you a half-assed OS, they'll give you a fully featured OS that has the advantage of having an OS designed around performance, security, usability and more importantly (according to them) designed around the use of web apps in mind. That means you can beat your ass you'll have all the offline apps you want and have an OS just as functional as your favourite distro.

</p><p>As for partnering with Adobe, what do you know, maybe they're out to get Adobe Photoshop on Chrome OS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it ?
Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part does n't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro .
They 're not stupid , they 'll do what the market wants to eat Microsoft 's yummy marketshare , they wo n't give you a half-assed OS , they 'll give you a fully featured OS that has the advantage of having an OS designed around performance , security , usability and more importantly ( according to them ) designed around the use of web apps in mind .
That means you can beat your ass you 'll have all the offline apps you want and have an OS just as functional as your favourite distro .
As for partnering with Adobe , what do you know , maybe they 're out to get Adobe Photoshop on Chrome OS ; - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it?
Just because the original blog post emphasised on the webapps part doesn't mean it will be any less functional than your favourite distro.
They're not stupid, they'll do what the market wants to eat Microsoft's yummy marketshare, they won't give you a half-assed OS, they'll give you a fully featured OS that has the advantage of having an OS designed around performance, security, usability and more importantly (according to them) designed around the use of web apps in mind.
That means you can beat your ass you'll have all the offline apps you want and have an OS just as functional as your favourite distro.
As for partnering with Adobe, what do you know, maybe they're out to get Adobe Photoshop on Chrome OS ;-).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635303</id>
	<title>Please! Make it light on resources Google</title>
	<author>indi0144</author>
	<datestamp>1247148960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would be nice to have a Linux desktop with a full set of features thats light on resources as it seem to be a thin client for cloud hosted apps and not so much into native apps. Adobe AIR / FLEX would be nice (inb4 Flash is teh sucks), maybe Google can push Adobe to release some CS apps ready for Linux or at least WINE optimized, THAT would be so fkskng AWESOME.<br><br>As the yesterday's article here noted, Google is doing a complete GUI from scratch, so, do it light Google, my Thinkpad A21 would be happy as many many old PC's. Yes, I know there are alternatives for Lite-Linux-Distros but the thin client is what I'm really looking for here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be nice to have a Linux desktop with a full set of features thats light on resources as it seem to be a thin client for cloud hosted apps and not so much into native apps .
Adobe AIR / FLEX would be nice ( inb4 Flash is teh sucks ) , maybe Google can push Adobe to release some CS apps ready for Linux or at least WINE optimized , THAT would be so fkskng AWESOME.As the yesterday 's article here noted , Google is doing a complete GUI from scratch , so , do it light Google , my Thinkpad A21 would be happy as many many old PC 's .
Yes , I know there are alternatives for Lite-Linux-Distros but the thin client is what I 'm really looking for here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be nice to have a Linux desktop with a full set of features thats light on resources as it seem to be a thin client for cloud hosted apps and not so much into native apps.
Adobe AIR / FLEX would be nice (inb4 Flash is teh sucks), maybe Google can push Adobe to release some CS apps ready for Linux or at least WINE optimized, THAT would be so fkskng AWESOME.As the yesterday's article here noted, Google is doing a complete GUI from scratch, so, do it light Google, my Thinkpad A21 would be happy as many many old PC's.
Yes, I know there are alternatives for Lite-Linux-Distros but the thin client is what I'm really looking for here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635465</id>
	<title>Re:Will Chrome OS be any different...</title>
	<author>indi0144</author>
	<datestamp>1247149860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's very neat, btw, and sorry for the ignorance but whats the primary language used to create an OS on a website like this? Ajax? Java? Firebug Shows me a lot of Java but, just plain Java???<br><br>I think the Google OS would be more like an "Hipervisor" and WebTop mix, You don't need to launch a browser the OS is the browser.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very neat , btw , and sorry for the ignorance but whats the primary language used to create an OS on a website like this ?
Ajax ? Java ?
Firebug Shows me a lot of Java but , just plain Java ? ?
? I think the Google OS would be more like an " Hipervisor " and WebTop mix , You do n't need to launch a browser the OS is the browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very neat, btw, and sorry for the ignorance but whats the primary language used to create an OS on a website like this?
Ajax? Java?
Firebug Shows me a lot of Java but, just plain Java??
?I think the Google OS would be more like an "Hipervisor" and WebTop mix, You don't need to launch a browser the OS is the browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638081</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247160480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it?</i> </p><p>Because they are stupid.  The key benefit to Google is a PC that defaults to google.com instead of bing.com.  If my usage of google.com a dozen times each day (or more) for search is worth just $0.05/day, then in 1 year that is $18.25 per year.  That is about what I average in OS purchases (last one XP Pro 8 years ago).  This declaws MSFTs ability to tie their shit into the OS or the browser.  Just like on XP/Vista/W7, you can use Firefox and never visit google.com.  The point is about defaults.  This is what many people don't realize.  Google doesn't need to sell something new but they do need to defend themselves from an increasingly web-centric Microsoft.  Even at work, many users change their homepage back to MSN.com (the fresh reinstall by myself starts with google.com).  This is a battle for the homepage, the search business.  Personal data is - at best - icing on the cake for those who don't erase cookies or use gmail.  Why would google want to store apps or data?  It is about adsense and search more than profiling.  There will always be stupid people to profile.  The trick is keeping them at google.com not bing.com.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it ?
Because they are stupid .
The key benefit to Google is a PC that defaults to google.com instead of bing.com .
If my usage of google.com a dozen times each day ( or more ) for search is worth just $ 0.05/day , then in 1 year that is $ 18.25 per year .
That is about what I average in OS purchases ( last one XP Pro 8 years ago ) .
This declaws MSFTs ability to tie their shit into the OS or the browser .
Just like on XP/Vista/W7 , you can use Firefox and never visit google.com .
The point is about defaults .
This is what many people do n't realize .
Google does n't need to sell something new but they do need to defend themselves from an increasingly web-centric Microsoft .
Even at work , many users change their homepage back to MSN.com ( the fresh reinstall by myself starts with google.com ) .
This is a battle for the homepage , the search business .
Personal data is - at best - icing on the cake for those who do n't erase cookies or use gmail .
Why would google want to store apps or data ?
It is about adsense and search more than profiling .
There will always be stupid people to profile .
The trick is keeping them at google.com not bing.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everybody act like Chrome OS will somehow be locked down to just running Chrome and using webapps into it?
Because they are stupid.
The key benefit to Google is a PC that defaults to google.com instead of bing.com.
If my usage of google.com a dozen times each day (or more) for search is worth just $0.05/day, then in 1 year that is $18.25 per year.
That is about what I average in OS purchases (last one XP Pro 8 years ago).
This declaws MSFTs ability to tie their shit into the OS or the browser.
Just like on XP/Vista/W7, you can use Firefox and never visit google.com.
The point is about defaults.
This is what many people don't realize.
Google doesn't need to sell something new but they do need to defend themselves from an increasingly web-centric Microsoft.
Even at work, many users change their homepage back to MSN.com (the fresh reinstall by myself starts with google.com).
This is a battle for the homepage, the search business.
Personal data is - at best - icing on the cake for those who don't erase cookies or use gmail.
Why would google want to store apps or data?
It is about adsense and search more than profiling.
There will always be stupid people to profile.
The trick is keeping them at google.com not bing.com.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647279</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>umberto\_soprano</author>
	<datestamp>1247221320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would you put your money in google-bank?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you put your money in google-bank ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you put your money in google-bank?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646055</id>
	<title>Fall of Privacy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247161680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed that no one mentioned a concern with privacy and security, especially in less friendly places.</p><p>Google has been known, just as most online companies, to cave to government's requests for censorship.  Take for example here in China.  They have scrubbed search results and disabled features at government's request.  At least this is what is openly known and public.  A fully online presence (documents and all) is a wet-dream for most governments.  Especially when they can pressure companies for the keys.  I worry that in 5-10 years time we will look at this as the end of privacy.  Just because the company behind this is <i>good</i> it does not mean that the idea is good.  Nor that it is safe from abuse.  We underestimate the power and pressure that governments place on companies.  And pay no interest until it identifies or affects us personally.</p><p>I guess time will tell if/how the OS will handle documents and privacy.  However the pitch for the OS is to be fully online-transparent/centric.</p><p>In a perfect world this idea sounds fantastic, however in the world we live in, this will make the NSA wiretapping depacle seem like peanuts.  And worse yet, we all seem, me included actually, to accept and worship this without question.  How would you respons if this was a product by Apple or Microsoft?  Or are the blinders simply there because the license says GPL?</p><p>Time will tell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed that no one mentioned a concern with privacy and security , especially in less friendly places.Google has been known , just as most online companies , to cave to government 's requests for censorship .
Take for example here in China .
They have scrubbed search results and disabled features at government 's request .
At least this is what is openly known and public .
A fully online presence ( documents and all ) is a wet-dream for most governments .
Especially when they can pressure companies for the keys .
I worry that in 5-10 years time we will look at this as the end of privacy .
Just because the company behind this is good it does not mean that the idea is good .
Nor that it is safe from abuse .
We underestimate the power and pressure that governments place on companies .
And pay no interest until it identifies or affects us personally.I guess time will tell if/how the OS will handle documents and privacy .
However the pitch for the OS is to be fully online-transparent/centric.In a perfect world this idea sounds fantastic , however in the world we live in , this will make the NSA wiretapping depacle seem like peanuts .
And worse yet , we all seem , me included actually , to accept and worship this without question .
How would you respons if this was a product by Apple or Microsoft ?
Or are the blinders simply there because the license says GPL ? Time will tell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed that no one mentioned a concern with privacy and security, especially in less friendly places.Google has been known, just as most online companies, to cave to government's requests for censorship.
Take for example here in China.
They have scrubbed search results and disabled features at government's request.
At least this is what is openly known and public.
A fully online presence (documents and all) is a wet-dream for most governments.
Especially when they can pressure companies for the keys.
I worry that in 5-10 years time we will look at this as the end of privacy.
Just because the company behind this is good it does not mean that the idea is good.
Nor that it is safe from abuse.
We underestimate the power and pressure that governments place on companies.
And pay no interest until it identifies or affects us personally.I guess time will tell if/how the OS will handle documents and privacy.
However the pitch for the OS is to be fully online-transparent/centric.In a perfect world this idea sounds fantastic, however in the world we live in, this will make the NSA wiretapping depacle seem like peanuts.
And worse yet, we all seem, me included actually, to accept and worship this without question.
How would you respons if this was a product by Apple or Microsoft?
Or are the blinders simply there because the license says GPL?Time will tell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638639</id>
	<title>The new gOS</title>
	<author>quickcel</author>
	<datestamp>1247162760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like the new gOS is coming sooner than we think:

<a href="http://www.thinkgos.com/cloud/index.html" title="thinkgos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkgos.com/cloud/index.html</a> [thinkgos.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like the new gOS is coming sooner than we think : http : //www.thinkgos.com/cloud/index.html [ thinkgos.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like the new gOS is coming sooner than we think:

http://www.thinkgos.com/cloud/index.html [thinkgos.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636465</id>
	<title>google IS the borg</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247153760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>microsoft is the romulans</p><p>apple is the klingons</p><p>linux is the vulcans</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>microsoft is the romulansapple is the klingonslinux is the vulcans</tokentext>
<sentencetext>microsoft is the romulansapple is the klingonslinux is the vulcans</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635077</id>
	<title>Resource wasting software included</title>
	<author>El\_Muerte\_TDS</author>
	<datestamp>1247147760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Google also said it had teamed up with Adobe<br>So we can expect major bloatware installed on the systems? Makes me wonder what Dell isn't on that list yet. I'm also wondering if Google is teaming up with Symantec.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google also said it had teamed up with AdobeSo we can expect major bloatware installed on the systems ?
Makes me wonder what Dell is n't on that list yet .
I 'm also wondering if Google is teaming up with Symantec .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Google also said it had teamed up with AdobeSo we can expect major bloatware installed on the systems?
Makes me wonder what Dell isn't on that list yet.
I'm also wondering if Google is teaming up with Symantec.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638373</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247161620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And here's the fun part: a typical desktop has all of these, because there is no standard, and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distro</p></div><p>QFT.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here 's the fun part : a typical desktop has all of these , because there is no standard , and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distroQFT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here's the fun part: a typical desktop has all of these, because there is no standard, and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distroQFT.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636133</id>
	<title>Re:Adobe</title>
	<author>EraserMouseMan</author>
	<datestamp>1247152800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe if Google partners with Microsoft we'll finally get decent everything support.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if Google partners with Microsoft we 'll finally get decent everything support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if Google partners with Microsoft we'll finally get decent everything support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635499</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1247150040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is this just smoke and mirrors. From what I have read this is Linux with a <b>custom GUI on the front end. </b></p> </div><p>Which is exactly what will make it better than any current Linux distributions. As long as the windowing system sucks a bit less than X11, we should be very happy!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this just smoke and mirrors .
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end .
Which is exactly what will make it better than any current Linux distributions .
As long as the windowing system sucks a bit less than X11 , we should be very happy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this just smoke and mirrors.
From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.
Which is exactly what will make it better than any current Linux distributions.
As long as the windowing system sucks a bit less than X11, we should be very happy!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636281</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>sarhjinian</author>
	<datestamp>1247153280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Docs can be used offline, albeit in a <a href="http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=92254" title="google.com">limited fashion.</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Docs can be used offline , albeit in a limited fashion .
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Docs can be used offline, albeit in a limited fashion.
[google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Kilz</author>
	<datestamp>1247150160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  How about just plain old Flash? Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player. The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor, too. I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager, but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support.</p></div><p>

Pure fud, the linux 64bit plugin works just as well as the windows flash plugin. The work arounds to install a 32bit plugin have not been needed for a long time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about just plain old Flash ?
Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player .
The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor , too .
I 'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager , but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support .
Pure fud , the linux 64bit plugin works just as well as the windows flash plugin .
The work arounds to install a 32bit plugin have not been needed for a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  How about just plain old Flash?
Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player.
The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor, too.
I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager, but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support.
Pure fud, the linux 64bit plugin works just as well as the windows flash plugin.
The work arounds to install a 32bit plugin have not been needed for a long time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635585</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247150400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Releasing desktop OS without ability to play YouTube videos, for example, would be really stupid. Also, Skype (or Google replacement?) will need Flash too. I can't see that working on JavaScript. Then there are existing apps (Gmail) that use Flash for some functionallity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Releasing desktop OS without ability to play YouTube videos , for example , would be really stupid .
Also , Skype ( or Google replacement ?
) will need Flash too .
I ca n't see that working on JavaScript .
Then there are existing apps ( Gmail ) that use Flash for some functionallity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Releasing desktop OS without ability to play YouTube videos, for example, would be really stupid.
Also, Skype (or Google replacement?
) will need Flash too.
I can't see that working on JavaScript.
Then there are existing apps (Gmail) that use Flash for some functionallity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635231</id>
	<title>Re:No Intel or AMD ?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1247148600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html" title="blogspot.com"> Yes </a> [blogspot.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Yes  [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638235</id>
	<title>Adobe Air Pandora One</title>
	<author>theuhstuf</author>
	<datestamp>1247161080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i love my little adobe.air pandora one app</htmltext>
<tokenext>i love my little adobe.air pandora one app</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i love my little adobe.air pandora one app</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642901</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1247136420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pure FUD. The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few months</p></div><p>Very good.  Now tell me how many times you used the command prompt and how many configuration files did you vi when you were setting up your chosen OS?</p><p>No good telling the user, "Its ok, you'll never need to do this again" if they have to spend the first two weeks learning bash and reading "read me" installation files that are more concerned with telling you how cool its chosen open source licence is, rather than anything useful the end user gives a damn about.  They'll be out buying Windows 7 before the end of the second day.</p><p>Whatever else you may think about Google, you have to recognise they are end-user, mass market focused.  Most Linux distros aren't.  Nothing wrong with that, but it means that most distros just won't ever threaten Windows' position on the desktop.  Google's just might.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pure FUD .
The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few monthsVery good .
Now tell me how many times you used the command prompt and how many configuration files did you vi when you were setting up your chosen OS ? No good telling the user , " Its ok , you 'll never need to do this again " if they have to spend the first two weeks learning bash and reading " read me " installation files that are more concerned with telling you how cool its chosen open source licence is , rather than anything useful the end user gives a damn about .
They 'll be out buying Windows 7 before the end of the second day.Whatever else you may think about Google , you have to recognise they are end-user , mass market focused .
Most Linux distros are n't .
Nothing wrong with that , but it means that most distros just wo n't ever threaten Windows ' position on the desktop .
Google 's just might .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pure FUD.
The only things I have used the command prompt for in the last few monthsVery good.
Now tell me how many times you used the command prompt and how many configuration files did you vi when you were setting up your chosen OS?No good telling the user, "Its ok, you'll never need to do this again" if they have to spend the first two weeks learning bash and reading "read me" installation files that are more concerned with telling you how cool its chosen open source licence is, rather than anything useful the end user gives a damn about.
They'll be out buying Windows 7 before the end of the second day.Whatever else you may think about Google, you have to recognise they are end-user, mass market focused.
Most Linux distros aren't.
Nothing wrong with that, but it means that most distros just won't ever threaten Windows' position on the desktop.
Google's just might.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637173</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>42</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>42</tokentext>
<sentencetext>42</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638565</id>
	<title>Why Dell isn't on the list</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1247162460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because "Dell recommends Windows Vista Professional". I know that to be true, because it's always printed on EVERY D*MN PAGE of every one of their catalogs.</p><p>I wonder how much they get paid for doing that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because " Dell recommends Windows Vista Professional " .
I know that to be true , because it 's always printed on EVERY D * MN PAGE of every one of their catalogs.I wonder how much they get paid for doing that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because "Dell recommends Windows Vista Professional".
I know that to be true, because it's always printed on EVERY D*MN PAGE of every one of their catalogs.I wonder how much they get paid for doing that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637187</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1247156340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My place of work sells and repairs Dell computers; Dell is a pretty solid computer, Acer is crap, trust me on this. I suppose I can't speak for every computer ever produced by the two companies, but the only problems we tend to have are virus related or people with destructive kids. The only serious issues that ever really come up with Dell notebooks are the cords that plug into the wall.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My place of work sells and repairs Dell computers ; Dell is a pretty solid computer , Acer is crap , trust me on this .
I suppose I ca n't speak for every computer ever produced by the two companies , but the only problems we tend to have are virus related or people with destructive kids .
The only serious issues that ever really come up with Dell notebooks are the cords that plug into the wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My place of work sells and repairs Dell computers; Dell is a pretty solid computer, Acer is crap, trust me on this.
I suppose I can't speak for every computer ever produced by the two companies, but the only problems we tend to have are virus related or people with destructive kids.
The only serious issues that ever really come up with Dell notebooks are the cords that plug into the wall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638667</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247162880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you haven't read properly.  It's based on the Linux kernel, but it will not be built from any existing distro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you have n't read properly .
It 's based on the Linux kernel , but it will not be built from any existing distro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you haven't read properly.
It's based on the Linux kernel, but it will not be built from any existing distro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635355</id>
	<title>Chrome OS screenshots leakskskskssss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/07/09/possible-chrome-os-shots-leak-out" title="neowin.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/07/09/possible-chrome-os-shots-leak-out</a> [neowin.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.neowin.net/news/main/09/07/09/possible-chrome-os-shots-leak-out [ neowin.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/07/09/possible-chrome-os-shots-leak-out [neowin.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641863</id>
	<title>Re:Google, *please* don't screw this up!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247132280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>weary means tired. Wary means suspicious. Maybe you meant weary, but I think you probably meant wary. Just politely pointing that out for you because my german is really poor<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>weary means tired .
Wary means suspicious .
Maybe you meant weary , but I think you probably meant wary .
Just politely pointing that out for you because my german is really poor : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>weary means tired.
Wary means suspicious.
Maybe you meant weary, but I think you probably meant wary.
Just politely pointing that out for you because my german is really poor :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637895</id>
	<title>Clueless Marketdroid-Infested</title>
	<author>StCredZero</author>
	<datestamp>1247159520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the company that left VisualBasic background processes running from their install, looking for all the world like VB script viruses or trojans!  Soaking up an appreciable amount of memory and CPU, just so their functionality would pop-up quickly.  Any company where the marketdroids can have their way and do something that most geeks would know is inadvisable -- they are too infested to salvage.</p><p>Try Foxit or Sumatra readers for PDFs!</p><p>(Not associated with either company!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the company that left VisualBasic background processes running from their install , looking for all the world like VB script viruses or trojans !
Soaking up an appreciable amount of memory and CPU , just so their functionality would pop-up quickly .
Any company where the marketdroids can have their way and do something that most geeks would know is inadvisable -- they are too infested to salvage.Try Foxit or Sumatra readers for PDFs !
( Not associated with either company !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the company that left VisualBasic background processes running from their install, looking for all the world like VB script viruses or trojans!
Soaking up an appreciable amount of memory and CPU, just so their functionality would pop-up quickly.
Any company where the marketdroids can have their way and do something that most geeks would know is inadvisable -- they are too infested to salvage.Try Foxit or Sumatra readers for PDFs!
(Not associated with either company!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636571</id>
	<title>Re:Noooo</title>
	<author>dougmwne</author>
	<datestamp>1247154120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All Hail Acrobat, King of the Bloatware!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All Hail Acrobat , King of the Bloatware !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All Hail Acrobat, King of the Bloatware!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635113</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247147940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially on ARM, which it is my understanding is limited to Flash 7.  This would allow them to provide a more "real" web experience on an ARM netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially on ARM , which it is my understanding is limited to Flash 7 .
This would allow them to provide a more " real " web experience on an ARM netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially on ARM, which it is my understanding is limited to Flash 7.
This would allow them to provide a more "real" web experience on an ARM netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646459</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247167740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WorksForMe(TM)</p><p>Format a disk.<br>Bluetooth.<br>Multiple displays.<br>Encryption.<br>Server administration.<br>
&nbsp; SAN<br>
&nbsp; Volume management<br>
&nbsp; Bonding<br>
&nbsp; etc, etc, etc, etc</p><p>To be fair, cli is acceptable for server roles right?  Not like Microsoft, Apple, or Sun put any effort into server ease of use... oh fuck, they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WorksForMe ( TM ) Format a disk.Bluetooth.Multiple displays.Encryption.Server administration .
  SAN   Volume management   Bonding   etc , etc , etc , etcTo be fair , cli is acceptable for server roles right ?
Not like Microsoft , Apple , or Sun put any effort into server ease of use... oh fuck , they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WorksForMe(TM)Format a disk.Bluetooth.Multiple displays.Encryption.Server administration.
  SAN
  Volume management
  Bonding
  etc, etc, etc, etcTo be fair, cli is acceptable for server roles right?
Not like Microsoft, Apple, or Sun put any effort into server ease of use... oh fuck, they do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123</id>
	<title>No Intel or AMD ?</title>
	<author>moon3</author>
	<datestamp>1247148000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that mean that Google OS will target ARM based architectures ? I would say so as they are befriending Qualcomm and Texas Instruments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean that Google OS will target ARM based architectures ?
I would say so as they are befriending Qualcomm and Texas Instruments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean that Google OS will target ARM based architectures ?
I would say so as they are befriending Qualcomm and Texas Instruments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639231</id>
	<title>ASUS?  will they apologize to MS yet again?</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1247164980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was surprising to see Asus listed since they pretty much signed a multi-year contract with Microsoft to stay away from Linux. I can only guess that this deal will give the Microsoft employees now working inside of Asus a chance to dig deep and dig early into what the Google Chrome OS is and how they can market against it. <br>
&nbsp; </p><p>LoB<br>
&nbsp; </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was surprising to see Asus listed since they pretty much signed a multi-year contract with Microsoft to stay away from Linux .
I can only guess that this deal will give the Microsoft employees now working inside of Asus a chance to dig deep and dig early into what the Google Chrome OS is and how they can market against it .
  LoB  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was surprising to see Asus listed since they pretty much signed a multi-year contract with Microsoft to stay away from Linux.
I can only guess that this deal will give the Microsoft employees now working inside of Asus a chance to dig deep and dig early into what the Google Chrome OS is and how they can market against it.
  LoB
  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636203</id>
	<title>Re:Google is not making an OS...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247153040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>True - the code name for their new windowing environment is Goggles. GNU\Goggles actually. Rose colored ones to be sure. Since Google isn't teh evil, they'll probably be able to see through things. Even create transparencies - GNU\Goggles that can convert standard movies to soft porn by seeing through clothes. Get your GNU\Goggles on your new GoogleBook!</htmltext>
<tokenext>True - the code name for their new windowing environment is Goggles .
GNU \ Goggles actually .
Rose colored ones to be sure .
Since Google is n't teh evil , they 'll probably be able to see through things .
Even create transparencies - GNU \ Goggles that can convert standard movies to soft porn by seeing through clothes .
Get your GNU \ Goggles on your new GoogleBook !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True - the code name for their new windowing environment is Goggles.
GNU\Goggles actually.
Rose colored ones to be sure.
Since Google isn't teh evil, they'll probably be able to see through things.
Even create transparencies - GNU\Goggles that can convert standard movies to soft porn by seeing through clothes.
Get your GNU\Goggles on your new GoogleBook!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646611</id>
	<title>Re:Down with G$$GLE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247256420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, it's GOOGL&#226;. Get with the times, yo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , it 's GOOGL   .
Get with the times , yo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, it's GOOGLâ.
Get with the times, yo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637475</id>
	<title>Re:How Many Years....?</title>
	<author>Zaiff Urgulbunger</author>
	<datestamp>1247157600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1.<br>
<br>
I think it'll be out in beta quite soon but will be out of beta by the time it gets pre-installed. Pure speculation of course.... but I'm right!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
I think it 'll be out in beta quite soon but will be out of beta by the time it gets pre-installed .
Pure speculation of course.... but I 'm right !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
I think it'll be out in beta quite soon but will be out of beta by the time it gets pre-installed.
Pure speculation of course.... but I'm right!
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637383</id>
	<title>Re:Noooo</title>
	<author>omeomi</author>
	<datestamp>1247157240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adobe AIR would make more sense. There's a reasonably large and growing library of applications, and it already works on Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adobe AIR would make more sense .
There 's a reasonably large and growing library of applications , and it already works on Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adobe AIR would make more sense.
There's a reasonably large and growing library of applications, and it already works on Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1247149320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about just plain old Flash? Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player. The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor, too. I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager, but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about just plain old Flash ?
Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player .
The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor , too .
I 'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager , but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about just plain old Flash?
Adobe has yet to release a stable 64b linux Flash player.
The hacks to make the 32b version work on 64b linux are rather poor, too.
I'm sure Google would want to use 64b linux for their Chrome Window Manager, but that would be a hard sell to consumers with flaky Flash support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641261</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247172660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey! Stop supporting their sick point of view, by also acting as if the command line was something bad like a cancer, and acting defensive!</p><p>The command line of Linux (bash plus all the apps and the "everything is a file" philosophy), is one of the greatest things in computing, ever made!</p><p>Why that bold statement?</p><p>Because it is the missing link between the basic Joe Sixpack user, and the programmer. It is the ability, to start out with one app command, make a small loop out of it, then later maybe put it into a shell script file. Oh, and I could add this little check in front of it, to make it more comfortable. And a month later, I notice i could do it better in this way. I add a GUI button to it. maybe one, two shortcuts, and some informative output.<br>And before I know it, I have grown a neat little (prototype) of a tool, that makes my everyday life easier.<br>I did not even have to learn programming. I just looked up what I needed in the bash man page and tldp.org bash scripting guide in the process.<br>And sure it is no great programming. But:</p><p><em>It makes my life easier and way more efficient!</em><br>It makes computers work for <em>me</em> again! Instead of what some development team thought I would need.</p><p>And maybe in a year, I will post it on the net, for others to use, and someone will re-write it in C++, with a bash interface and maybe a GUI.</p><p>My first result of this process, was this very very useful little app: <a href="https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread\_id=2942061&amp;forum\_id=19083" title="sourceforge.net">https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread\_id=2942061&amp;forum\_id=19083</a> [sourceforge.net]</p><p>Therfore I proudly recommend the bash shell as the best thing since sliced bread to my friends, my brothers, moms, old car mechanics, etc, whenever I can.<br>They feel like gurus when they get their first little working "magic thingie" that they could make in an hour and saved them sooo much time!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey !
Stop supporting their sick point of view , by also acting as if the command line was something bad like a cancer , and acting defensive ! The command line of Linux ( bash plus all the apps and the " everything is a file " philosophy ) , is one of the greatest things in computing , ever made ! Why that bold statement ? Because it is the missing link between the basic Joe Sixpack user , and the programmer .
It is the ability , to start out with one app command , make a small loop out of it , then later maybe put it into a shell script file .
Oh , and I could add this little check in front of it , to make it more comfortable .
And a month later , I notice i could do it better in this way .
I add a GUI button to it .
maybe one , two shortcuts , and some informative output.And before I know it , I have grown a neat little ( prototype ) of a tool , that makes my everyday life easier.I did not even have to learn programming .
I just looked up what I needed in the bash man page and tldp.org bash scripting guide in the process.And sure it is no great programming .
But : It makes my life easier and way more efficient ! It makes computers work for me again !
Instead of what some development team thought I would need.And maybe in a year , I will post it on the net , for others to use , and someone will re-write it in C + + , with a bash interface and maybe a GUI.My first result of this process , was this very very useful little app : https : //sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php ? thread \ _id = 2942061&amp;forum \ _id = 19083 [ sourceforge.net ] Therfore I proudly recommend the bash shell as the best thing since sliced bread to my friends , my brothers , moms , old car mechanics , etc , whenever I can.They feel like gurus when they get their first little working " magic thingie " that they could make in an hour and saved them sooo much time !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!
Stop supporting their sick point of view, by also acting as if the command line was something bad like a cancer, and acting defensive!The command line of Linux (bash plus all the apps and the "everything is a file" philosophy), is one of the greatest things in computing, ever made!Why that bold statement?Because it is the missing link between the basic Joe Sixpack user, and the programmer.
It is the ability, to start out with one app command, make a small loop out of it, then later maybe put it into a shell script file.
Oh, and I could add this little check in front of it, to make it more comfortable.
And a month later, I notice i could do it better in this way.
I add a GUI button to it.
maybe one, two shortcuts, and some informative output.And before I know it, I have grown a neat little (prototype) of a tool, that makes my everyday life easier.I did not even have to learn programming.
I just looked up what I needed in the bash man page and tldp.org bash scripting guide in the process.And sure it is no great programming.
But:It makes my life easier and way more efficient!It makes computers work for me again!
Instead of what some development team thought I would need.And maybe in a year, I will post it on the net, for others to use, and someone will re-write it in C++, with a bash interface and maybe a GUI.My first result of this process, was this very very useful little app: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread\_id=2942061&amp;forum\_id=19083 [sourceforge.net]Therfore I proudly recommend the bash shell as the best thing since sliced bread to my friends, my brothers, moms, old car mechanics, etc, whenever I can.They feel like gurus when they get their first little working "magic thingie" that they could make in an hour and saved them sooo much time!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647773</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone actually RTFA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247229180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not true, there is a link to a Google Chrome OS FAQ that lists the partners mentioned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not true , there is a link to a Google Chrome OS FAQ that lists the partners mentioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not true, there is a link to a Google Chrome OS FAQ that lists the partners mentioned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651295</id>
	<title>How many iPhones are out there?</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1247246820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2.</p><p>Uhm, er, yeah, whatever...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2.Uhm , er , yeah , whatever.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2.Uhm, er, yeah, whatever...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638695</id>
	<title>Not the same thing...</title>
	<author>mario\_grgic</author>
	<datestamp>1247163000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your business strategy, customer information (which you are most times legally bound to keep private), etc are not the same as your money (earnings) which is you are a public company is public information anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your business strategy , customer information ( which you are most times legally bound to keep private ) , etc are not the same as your money ( earnings ) which is you are a public company is public information anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your business strategy, customer information (which you are most times legally bound to keep private), etc are not the same as your money (earnings) which is you are a public company is public information anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637073</id>
	<title>Re:Lotsa unwarranted pessimism around here</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1247155980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested, unproven platform with an unknown number of users (if Chrome the browser is any indication, it'll be small).</p><p>I also can't see a Google OS doing anything other than the internet unless there's either a way to track what you do for advertising purposes, or actual ads embedded in the OS full-time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested , unproven platform with an unknown number of users ( if Chrome the browser is any indication , it 'll be small ) .I also ca n't see a Google OS doing anything other than the internet unless there 's either a way to track what you do for advertising purposes , or actual ads embedded in the OS full-time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't see Adobe spending the time/money to port Photoshop to an untested, unproven platform with an unknown number of users (if Chrome the browser is any indication, it'll be small).I also can't see a Google OS doing anything other than the internet unless there's either a way to track what you do for advertising purposes, or actual ads embedded in the OS full-time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636729</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>asc99c</author>
	<datestamp>1247154720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I'm only echoing the thoughts of the AC who has already replied, they've got a score of 0 while you're modded up.  A few people at work have Acer laptops and the opinion overall is very good - extremely good given the prices.  I mean I can imagine still holding a grudge after a poor experience with a Pentium 3 era machine, but 486s?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'm only echoing the thoughts of the AC who has already replied , they 've got a score of 0 while you 're modded up .
A few people at work have Acer laptops and the opinion overall is very good - extremely good given the prices .
I mean I can imagine still holding a grudge after a poor experience with a Pentium 3 era machine , but 486s ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'm only echoing the thoughts of the AC who has already replied, they've got a score of 0 while you're modded up.
A few people at work have Acer laptops and the opinion overall is very good - extremely good given the prices.
I mean I can imagine still holding a grudge after a poor experience with a Pentium 3 era machine, but 486s?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636807</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1247154960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from</p> </div><p>This is Google we're talking about.  They likely have more cash and resources than every Linux distro combined.  Believe me, they're not going to build this from any existing distro.  You can believe this will be custom built by Google rather than yet another Debian derivative or somesuch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from This is Google we 're talking about .
They likely have more cash and resources than every Linux distro combined .
Believe me , they 're not going to build this from any existing distro .
You can believe this will be custom built by Google rather than yet another Debian derivative or somesuch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depending on how they market it and which distro it is built from This is Google we're talking about.
They likely have more cash and resources than every Linux distro combined.
Believe me, they're not going to build this from any existing distro.
You can believe this will be custom built by Google rather than yet another Debian derivative or somesuch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636397</id>
	<title>Re:Acrobat, huh</title>
	<author>je ne sais quoi</author>
	<datestamp>1247153580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they're looking to port Photoshop to linux....<br> <br>  And make pigs fly while they'e at it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 're looking to port Photoshop to linux.... And make pigs fly while they'e at it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they're looking to port Photoshop to linux....   And make pigs fly while they'e at it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645789</id>
	<title>Are we in the cloud yet?</title>
	<author>DrVomact</author>
	<datestamp>1247157660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My initial reaction to the Google announcement was deep skepticism. A "web" operating system? How silly. It didn't seem to me that what was being discussed was a real "operating system" at all&mdash;not like Unix or Windows. But later on in the day, it hit me: maybe Google really does have the smartest people on the planet working for them.</p><p>
I've often remarked on how most people who now use computers actually shouldn't be let near one; anybody here who has been asked to help a relative with their fubared PC knows exactly what I am talking about. And I've fondly dreamed of being able to hand those migraine-inducing family members whose PCs are basically the computer equivalent of vacuum cleaners stuffed with viral dust bunnies a simple thin client box that you just plug in to the network, and <em>can't possibly be screwed up because it's too limited to do anything dangerous</em>. Dammit. And my esteemed spousal unit (now I've let the cat out of the bag) would be grateful for something like this: a box you plug in, use to surf the net, and read email, and that runs light applications (like Freecell!), and that doesn't get crudded up with all those nasty pop-ups and resource-sucking trojans.</p><p>
Well, maybe this is it! The computer for the Facebook generation. Will it mean the death of Microsoft? Probably not&mdash;they're too big to die quick. But it will totally change the landscape. I wonder, will anybody but specialists and "enthusiasts" be using real general purpose computers 20 or 30 years from now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My initial reaction to the Google announcement was deep skepticism .
A " web " operating system ?
How silly .
It did n't seem to me that what was being discussed was a real " operating system " at all    not like Unix or Windows .
But later on in the day , it hit me : maybe Google really does have the smartest people on the planet working for them .
I 've often remarked on how most people who now use computers actually should n't be let near one ; anybody here who has been asked to help a relative with their fubared PC knows exactly what I am talking about .
And I 've fondly dreamed of being able to hand those migraine-inducing family members whose PCs are basically the computer equivalent of vacuum cleaners stuffed with viral dust bunnies a simple thin client box that you just plug in to the network , and ca n't possibly be screwed up because it 's too limited to do anything dangerous .
Dammit. And my esteemed spousal unit ( now I 've let the cat out of the bag ) would be grateful for something like this : a box you plug in , use to surf the net , and read email , and that runs light applications ( like Freecell !
) , and that does n't get crudded up with all those nasty pop-ups and resource-sucking trojans .
Well , maybe this is it !
The computer for the Facebook generation .
Will it mean the death of Microsoft ?
Probably not    they 're too big to die quick .
But it will totally change the landscape .
I wonder , will anybody but specialists and " enthusiasts " be using real general purpose computers 20 or 30 years from now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My initial reaction to the Google announcement was deep skepticism.
A "web" operating system?
How silly.
It didn't seem to me that what was being discussed was a real "operating system" at all—not like Unix or Windows.
But later on in the day, it hit me: maybe Google really does have the smartest people on the planet working for them.
I've often remarked on how most people who now use computers actually shouldn't be let near one; anybody here who has been asked to help a relative with their fubared PC knows exactly what I am talking about.
And I've fondly dreamed of being able to hand those migraine-inducing family members whose PCs are basically the computer equivalent of vacuum cleaners stuffed with viral dust bunnies a simple thin client box that you just plug in to the network, and can't possibly be screwed up because it's too limited to do anything dangerous.
Dammit. And my esteemed spousal unit (now I've let the cat out of the bag) would be grateful for something like this: a box you plug in, use to surf the net, and read email, and that runs light applications (like Freecell!
), and that doesn't get crudded up with all those nasty pop-ups and resource-sucking trojans.
Well, maybe this is it!
The computer for the Facebook generation.
Will it mean the death of Microsoft?
Probably not—they're too big to die quick.
But it will totally change the landscape.
I wonder, will anybody but specialists and "enthusiasts" be using real general purpose computers 20 or 30 years from now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637097</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>tessonec</author>
	<datestamp>1247156100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Nokia Tablets (here, a happy N800 owner) ship with Flash 9, which works quite fine. And it has Linux... And it has an ARM (armel) architecture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nokia Tablets ( here , a happy N800 owner ) ship with Flash 9 , which works quite fine .
And it has Linux... And it has an ARM ( armel ) architecture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nokia Tablets (here, a happy N800 owner) ship with Flash 9, which works quite fine.
And it has Linux... And it has an ARM (armel) architecture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Just today, I gave a presentation created with Google Docs.</p></div></blockquote><p>
You'd absolutely love this, would you? Would you love it when Google Docs goes down, or your internet connection stops working, when it's time to give your presentation?</p><blockquote><div><p>you have a situation where you hardly need local storage</p></div></blockquote><p>
When the inevitable happens as above, you'll suddenly wish you had local storage, and local applications.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just today , I gave a presentation created with Google Docs .
You 'd absolutely love this , would you ?
Would you love it when Google Docs goes down , or your internet connection stops working , when it 's time to give your presentation ? you have a situation where you hardly need local storage When the inevitable happens as above , you 'll suddenly wish you had local storage , and local applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just today, I gave a presentation created with Google Docs.
You'd absolutely love this, would you?
Would you love it when Google Docs goes down, or your internet connection stops working, when it's time to give your presentation?you have a situation where you hardly need local storage
When the inevitable happens as above, you'll suddenly wish you had local storage, and local applications.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637623</id>
	<title>Re:Will Chrome OS be any different...</title>
	<author>suffe</author>
	<datestamp>1247158200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me preface this by saying I dislike the whole 'web OS' crap that Starforce, among others, represent. Useless. At least for me. Maybe there is a target group out there for this stuff too. I would like to get hold of the underlying software though to run on my own server. Does anyone know if this is possible/available?</p><p>There is every now and again a moment when it could be useful. I have my own documents saved on my server (mostly) and I could certainly set up rsync'ish capabilities (or something similar) to have it mirrored completely. All this stuff, useless as it is living on someone elses hardware could actually sometimes be useful living on your own. Also it could be amusing to experiment with.</p><p>I seem to remember some vnc java applet that I guess could technically do something similar, but handled correctly I think this could be better (as in not completely suck as the VNC sollution did when I last tried it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me preface this by saying I dislike the whole 'web OS ' crap that Starforce , among others , represent .
Useless. At least for me .
Maybe there is a target group out there for this stuff too .
I would like to get hold of the underlying software though to run on my own server .
Does anyone know if this is possible/available ? There is every now and again a moment when it could be useful .
I have my own documents saved on my server ( mostly ) and I could certainly set up rsync'ish capabilities ( or something similar ) to have it mirrored completely .
All this stuff , useless as it is living on someone elses hardware could actually sometimes be useful living on your own .
Also it could be amusing to experiment with.I seem to remember some vnc java applet that I guess could technically do something similar , but handled correctly I think this could be better ( as in not completely suck as the VNC sollution did when I last tried it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me preface this by saying I dislike the whole 'web OS' crap that Starforce, among others, represent.
Useless. At least for me.
Maybe there is a target group out there for this stuff too.
I would like to get hold of the underlying software though to run on my own server.
Does anyone know if this is possible/available?There is every now and again a moment when it could be useful.
I have my own documents saved on my server (mostly) and I could certainly set up rsync'ish capabilities (or something similar) to have it mirrored completely.
All this stuff, useless as it is living on someone elses hardware could actually sometimes be useful living on your own.
Also it could be amusing to experiment with.I seem to remember some vnc java applet that I guess could technically do something similar, but handled correctly I think this could be better (as in not completely suck as the VNC sollution did when I last tried it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635267</id>
	<title>Re:No Intel or AMD ?</title>
	<author>Allicorn</author>
	<datestamp>1247148780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yesterday's blog post did mention ARM, yes.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday 's blog post did mention ARM , yes.Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday's blog post did mention ARM, yes.Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635253</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1247148720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're saying "it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template" like it's a good thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're saying " it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template " like it 's a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're saying "it was virtually indistinguisable from our usual company its PowerPoint template" like it's a good thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1247136120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, your post is pure FUD. I bet you're posting from a top of the line gaming machine right? Bought the parts off newegg, and put it together yourself? Good hardware support, right?</p><p>I have an old Dell computer sitting here, which is something the average user would have. Here's the problems I encountered:</p><p>1) xorg.conf needed to be manually configured to fix the resolution and refresh rate. It required a lot of cmdline stuff; not as simple as opening the file in gedit and clicking save.</p><p>2) Ubuntu 8.10 broke compatibility with the SATA controller, in such a way that it booted okay, and then corrupted the disk while running. This took quite a bit of cmdline work to "fix". I wiped out the partition and installed a SATA PCI card to run the drive from.</p><p>3) Permissions wouldn't stick on my ext3 partition. Had to use cmdline rather than Nautilus to get it so users could read files and create new files on the partition. Without doing that, gedit couldn't save anywhere, and I couldn't open anything Firefox downloaded.</p><p>No offense to you, but the average user won't tolerate this crap. They barely tolerate stuff like UAC, and this is way beyond that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , your post is pure FUD .
I bet you 're posting from a top of the line gaming machine right ?
Bought the parts off newegg , and put it together yourself ?
Good hardware support , right ? I have an old Dell computer sitting here , which is something the average user would have .
Here 's the problems I encountered : 1 ) xorg.conf needed to be manually configured to fix the resolution and refresh rate .
It required a lot of cmdline stuff ; not as simple as opening the file in gedit and clicking save.2 ) Ubuntu 8.10 broke compatibility with the SATA controller , in such a way that it booted okay , and then corrupted the disk while running .
This took quite a bit of cmdline work to " fix " .
I wiped out the partition and installed a SATA PCI card to run the drive from.3 ) Permissions would n't stick on my ext3 partition .
Had to use cmdline rather than Nautilus to get it so users could read files and create new files on the partition .
Without doing that , gedit could n't save anywhere , and I could n't open anything Firefox downloaded.No offense to you , but the average user wo n't tolerate this crap .
They barely tolerate stuff like UAC , and this is way beyond that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, your post is pure FUD.
I bet you're posting from a top of the line gaming machine right?
Bought the parts off newegg, and put it together yourself?
Good hardware support, right?I have an old Dell computer sitting here, which is something the average user would have.
Here's the problems I encountered:1) xorg.conf needed to be manually configured to fix the resolution and refresh rate.
It required a lot of cmdline stuff; not as simple as opening the file in gedit and clicking save.2) Ubuntu 8.10 broke compatibility with the SATA controller, in such a way that it booted okay, and then corrupted the disk while running.
This took quite a bit of cmdline work to "fix".
I wiped out the partition and installed a SATA PCI card to run the drive from.3) Permissions wouldn't stick on my ext3 partition.
Had to use cmdline rather than Nautilus to get it so users could read files and create new files on the partition.
Without doing that, gedit couldn't save anywhere, and I couldn't open anything Firefox downloaded.No offense to you, but the average user won't tolerate this crap.
They barely tolerate stuff like UAC, and this is way beyond that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635879</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, Google. You're teaming up w/Adobe, too?</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1247151720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is a giant. It partners with other giants, not with little independent reverse-engineering projects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is a giant .
It partners with other giants , not with little independent reverse-engineering projects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is a giant.
It partners with other giants, not with little independent reverse-engineering projects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1247151480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.</p></div><p>If they're happy with that, they'll fail bigtime. If they really want something big, they'll port the Haiku base system to the Linux kernel or something.</p><p>I'm serious. The sheer number of abstraction layers between the bare metal and a typical Linux GUI application is astounding. The kernel itself has drivers, file systems, schedulers, etc., then there's glibc (horribly bloated in itself, and probably destined to remain so for compatibility and portability), then glib and X (don't get me started on that one), then you finally get to make some choices: OO or not? GTK or Qt? GNOME or KDE? If Qt, v3 or v4? Do you want Python with that? Java? How about sound? Alsa, pulseaudio, jack, gstreamer, xine?</p><p>And here's the fun part: a typical desktop has <i>all</i> of these, because there is no standard, and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distro (Amarok, K3b, Firefox, Pidgin, whatever).</p><p>Now, compare this to the Haiku API: Simple, clean, use it and you have everything you need. The result? You get a usable desktop in 5 seconds under VirtualBox. How long does your OS take to boot up?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.If they 're happy with that , they 'll fail bigtime .
If they really want something big , they 'll port the Haiku base system to the Linux kernel or something.I 'm serious .
The sheer number of abstraction layers between the bare metal and a typical Linux GUI application is astounding .
The kernel itself has drivers , file systems , schedulers , etc. , then there 's glibc ( horribly bloated in itself , and probably destined to remain so for compatibility and portability ) , then glib and X ( do n't get me started on that one ) , then you finally get to make some choices : OO or not ?
GTK or Qt ?
GNOME or KDE ?
If Qt , v3 or v4 ?
Do you want Python with that ?
Java ? How about sound ?
Alsa , pulseaudio , jack , gstreamer , xine ? And here 's the fun part : a typical desktop has all of these , because there is no standard , and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distro ( Amarok , K3b , Firefox , Pidgin , whatever ) .Now , compare this to the Haiku API : Simple , clean , use it and you have everything you need .
The result ?
You get a usable desktop in 5 seconds under VirtualBox .
How long does your OS take to boot up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I have read this is Linux with a custom GUI on the front end.If they're happy with that, they'll fail bigtime.
If they really want something big, they'll port the Haiku base system to the Linux kernel or something.I'm serious.
The sheer number of abstraction layers between the bare metal and a typical Linux GUI application is astounding.
The kernel itself has drivers, file systems, schedulers, etc., then there's glibc (horribly bloated in itself, and probably destined to remain so for compatibility and portability), then glib and X (don't get me started on that one), then you finally get to make some choices: OO or not?
GTK or Qt?
GNOME or KDE?
If Qt, v3 or v4?
Do you want Python with that?
Java? How about sound?
Alsa, pulseaudio, jack, gstreamer, xine?And here's the fun part: a typical desktop has all of these, because there is no standard, and every choice excludes some vital application you absolutely must have to be a decent distro (Amarok, K3b, Firefox, Pidgin, whatever).Now, compare this to the Haiku API: Simple, clean, use it and you have everything you need.
The result?
You get a usable desktop in 5 seconds under VirtualBox.
How long does your OS take to boot up?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28653235</id>
	<title>Re:Noooo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247255160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anything but Acrobat, king of the bloatware!</p></div><p>Did Acrobat already (bl)overtook Nero?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything but Acrobat , king of the bloatware ! Did Acrobat already ( bl ) overtook Nero ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything but Acrobat, king of the bloatware!Did Acrobat already (bl)overtook Nero?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</id>
	<title>Google is not making an OS...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247150820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All Google is doing is making a new windowing environment for Linux, sounds like just another distro to me.  But I guess with all the distros out there it would not generate much hype if they just said "oh we are building our own distro".<br> <br>It's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up, I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All Google is doing is making a new windowing environment for Linux , sounds like just another distro to me .
But I guess with all the distros out there it would not generate much hype if they just said " oh we are building our own distro " .
It 's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up , I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All Google is doing is making a new windowing environment for Linux, sounds like just another distro to me.
But I guess with all the distros out there it would not generate much hype if they just said "oh we are building our own distro".
It's all about the FUD and you guys are eating it up, I would have thought that the Linux fanbois would have figured that out by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640149</id>
	<title>Building Gnash everywhere!</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1247168400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If your package manager doesn't provide a build of Gnash for you, <a href="http://wiki.gnashdev.org/Category:Building\_Gnash\_on" title="gnashdev.org">read the build instructions for your platform</a> [gnashdev.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If your package manager does n't provide a build of Gnash for you , read the build instructions for your platform [ gnashdev.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your package manager doesn't provide a build of Gnash for you, read the build instructions for your platform [gnashdev.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635783</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247151360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not for nothing, but if in the theoretical future we have moved back to the dumb terminal / networked data paradigm of the past, won't everyone at the meeting pretty much understand that when the system is down, the system is down?</p><p>Admittedly, in the current climate, not having local solutions to Internet outages seems shortsighted. But when it becomes the norm, nobody's gonna be on your back about it.</p><p>In the future, this'll be a straw man argument.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not for nothing , but if in the theoretical future we have moved back to the dumb terminal / networked data paradigm of the past , wo n't everyone at the meeting pretty much understand that when the system is down , the system is down ? Admittedly , in the current climate , not having local solutions to Internet outages seems shortsighted .
But when it becomes the norm , nobody 's gon na be on your back about it.In the future , this 'll be a straw man argument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not for nothing, but if in the theoretical future we have moved back to the dumb terminal / networked data paradigm of the past, won't everyone at the meeting pretty much understand that when the system is down, the system is down?Admittedly, in the current climate, not having local solutions to Internet outages seems shortsighted.
But when it becomes the norm, nobody's gonna be on your back about it.In the future, this'll be a straw man argument.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638251</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1247161200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually Google Docs its uptime is not worse than my own stuff, if you count broken laptops, etc. It also has a number of features that are hard for me to duplicate (reachable everywhere, revisions, you name it). As others mentioned, you have Google Gears for (part of) Docs, for GMail and for their RSS reader.</p><p>As per your comment about a failing internet connection, I have a backup internet connection through my 3G mobile phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually Google Docs its uptime is not worse than my own stuff , if you count broken laptops , etc .
It also has a number of features that are hard for me to duplicate ( reachable everywhere , revisions , you name it ) .
As others mentioned , you have Google Gears for ( part of ) Docs , for GMail and for their RSS reader.As per your comment about a failing internet connection , I have a backup internet connection through my 3G mobile phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually Google Docs its uptime is not worse than my own stuff, if you count broken laptops, etc.
It also has a number of features that are hard for me to duplicate (reachable everywhere, revisions, you name it).
As others mentioned, you have Google Gears for (part of) Docs, for GMail and for their RSS reader.As per your comment about a failing internet connection, I have a backup internet connection through my 3G mobile phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443</id>
	<title>Adobe</title>
	<author>iVasto</author>
	<datestamp>1247149740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe if Google partners with Adobe we will finally get decent flash support on Linux, especially since Google owns Youtube. The current flash plugin is horribly inefficient for Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if Google partners with Adobe we will finally get decent flash support on Linux , especially since Google owns Youtube .
The current flash plugin is horribly inefficient for Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if Google partners with Adobe we will finally get decent flash support on Linux, especially since Google owns Youtube.
The current flash plugin is horribly inefficient for Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637757</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>CyDharttha</author>
	<datestamp>1247158860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Dell mini 10v is <a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/linux\_3x?c=us&amp;cs=19&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs" title="dell.com" rel="nofollow">$299</a> [dell.com]. Get solid state drive for an extra $30. Same price for Ubuntu or WinXP. Looks like they just got rid of the mini 9, too bad. It was also $299.</p><p>Can't see prices getting too much lower than that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Dell mini 10v is $ 299 [ dell.com ] .
Get solid state drive for an extra $ 30 .
Same price for Ubuntu or WinXP .
Looks like they just got rid of the mini 9 , too bad .
It was also $ 299.Ca n't see prices getting too much lower than that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Dell mini 10v is $299 [dell.com].
Get solid state drive for an extra $30.
Same price for Ubuntu or WinXP.
Looks like they just got rid of the mini 9, too bad.
It was also $299.Can't see prices getting too much lower than that!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639249</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>abigor</author>
	<datestamp>1247165040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed, all this speculation about window managers, ease of use, etc. is futile. Do you find Gmail and Co. easy to use? Then guess what, Chrome OS will be easy to use.</p><p>This is what Sun was trying to do ages ago with their "network computers" or whatever they called them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , all this speculation about window managers , ease of use , etc .
is futile .
Do you find Gmail and Co. easy to use ?
Then guess what , Chrome OS will be easy to use.This is what Sun was trying to do ages ago with their " network computers " or whatever they called them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, all this speculation about window managers, ease of use, etc.
is futile.
Do you find Gmail and Co. easy to use?
Then guess what, Chrome OS will be easy to use.This is what Sun was trying to do ages ago with their "network computers" or whatever they called them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635467</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247149860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like OS X is just "Next with a custom GUI on the front end"?</p><p>Obviously we'll have to wait and see what they release. But I fail to see how starting from an existing OS means that they aren't bringing anything new, or that they're relying on marketing. And even better, they'll be giving their new OS back to the open source community.</p><p><i>Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.</i></p><p>Right, but to be blunt, those of us who do this are such a minority that I doubt Google are worried about that factor. The competition is Windows 7 (and perhaps to a lesser degree, netbooks that are shipping with Linux preinstalled).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like OS X is just " Next with a custom GUI on the front end " ? Obviously we 'll have to wait and see what they release .
But I fail to see how starting from an existing OS means that they are n't bringing anything new , or that they 're relying on marketing .
And even better , they 'll be giving their new OS back to the open source community.Unless this offers any real advantage I wo n't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.Right , but to be blunt , those of us who do this are such a minority that I doubt Google are worried about that factor .
The competition is Windows 7 ( and perhaps to a lesser degree , netbooks that are shipping with Linux preinstalled ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like OS X is just "Next with a custom GUI on the front end"?Obviously we'll have to wait and see what they release.
But I fail to see how starting from an existing OS means that they aren't bringing anything new, or that they're relying on marketing.
And even better, they'll be giving their new OS back to the open source community.Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it even it I purchase a netbook with it I would probably format and load Ubuntu on it.Right, but to be blunt, those of us who do this are such a minority that I doubt Google are worried about that factor.
The competition is Windows 7 (and perhaps to a lesser degree, netbooks that are shipping with Linux preinstalled).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635193</id>
	<title>Where's Dell?</title>
	<author>kaaposc</author>
	<datestamp>1247148360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seeing Dell <a href="http://www1.euro.dell.com/uk/en/home/mini\_laptop\_deals/fs.aspx?refid=mini\_laptop\_deals&amp;s=dhs&amp;cs=ukdhs1" title="dell.com" rel="nofollow">Minis bundled with Ubuntu</a> [dell.com] I thought they will be one of the prime partners.. What's up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing Dell Minis bundled with Ubuntu [ dell.com ] I thought they will be one of the prime partners.. What 's up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing Dell Minis bundled with Ubuntu [dell.com] I thought they will be one of the prime partners.. What's up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637329</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>DuckDodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1247156940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Frankly, I still expect Google OS to become at best a tiny portion of the PC market.   But that said, they have enormous advantages over other Linux desktop distributions:  1.  Name recognition - favorable name recognition - from the average computer user.  2.  Massive funding available for QA, pretty graphics, detailed documentation, and so forth.  These days Ubuntu and OpenSuse, among others, are damn good, but Google has the resources to do even better.  3. Massive funding available for advertising.  4.  The ability to sell machines to end-users with their distribution pre-installed.   This has happened before with Linux in small numbers, but even at its peak it was tiny numbers and little attention.   This will be available and widely known.  <br> <br>But even with all those advantages, I expect the three way combination of Microsoft FUD, Microsoft genuine attempts to compete by improving their products, and consumer comfort with Microsoft will still leave Redmond controlling more than 90\% of the PC market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I still expect Google OS to become at best a tiny portion of the PC market .
But that said , they have enormous advantages over other Linux desktop distributions : 1 .
Name recognition - favorable name recognition - from the average computer user .
2. Massive funding available for QA , pretty graphics , detailed documentation , and so forth .
These days Ubuntu and OpenSuse , among others , are damn good , but Google has the resources to do even better .
3. Massive funding available for advertising .
4. The ability to sell machines to end-users with their distribution pre-installed .
This has happened before with Linux in small numbers , but even at its peak it was tiny numbers and little attention .
This will be available and widely known .
But even with all those advantages , I expect the three way combination of Microsoft FUD , Microsoft genuine attempts to compete by improving their products , and consumer comfort with Microsoft will still leave Redmond controlling more than 90 \ % of the PC market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I still expect Google OS to become at best a tiny portion of the PC market.
But that said, they have enormous advantages over other Linux desktop distributions:  1.
Name recognition - favorable name recognition - from the average computer user.
2.  Massive funding available for QA, pretty graphics, detailed documentation, and so forth.
These days Ubuntu and OpenSuse, among others, are damn good, but Google has the resources to do even better.
3. Massive funding available for advertising.
4.  The ability to sell machines to end-users with their distribution pre-installed.
This has happened before with Linux in small numbers, but even at its peak it was tiny numbers and little attention.
This will be available and widely known.
But even with all those advantages, I expect the three way combination of Microsoft FUD, Microsoft genuine attempts to compete by improving their products, and consumer comfort with Microsoft will still leave Redmond controlling more than 90\% of the PC market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637213</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247156400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You may want to take a look again. If the last machine from Acer that you touched was a 486.... the company has come a long, long way since then.  Their quality is on par or better than the other major OEMs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You may want to take a look again .
If the last machine from Acer that you touched was a 486.... the company has come a long , long way since then .
Their quality is on par or better than the other major OEMs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may want to take a look again.
If the last machine from Acer that you touched was a 486.... the company has come a long, long way since then.
Their quality is on par or better than the other major OEMs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639153</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247164680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is FUD, not smoke and mirrors.  They have no product, no demo, no screenshots, no information of any kind except that it's 'a new os' (linux) and 'runs chrome' in some way.</p><p>The only purpose to this announcement is to generate lots of speculation and confusion, driving Microsoft or Apple to tilt at windmills, or businesses to hold off on multi-year contracts, or whatever actual reason behind it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is FUD , not smoke and mirrors .
They have no product , no demo , no screenshots , no information of any kind except that it 's 'a new os ' ( linux ) and 'runs chrome ' in some way.The only purpose to this announcement is to generate lots of speculation and confusion , driving Microsoft or Apple to tilt at windmills , or businesses to hold off on multi-year contracts , or whatever actual reason behind it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is FUD, not smoke and mirrors.
They have no product, no demo, no screenshots, no information of any kind except that it's 'a new os' (linux) and 'runs chrome' in some way.The only purpose to this announcement is to generate lots of speculation and confusion, driving Microsoft or Apple to tilt at windmills, or businesses to hold off on multi-year contracts, or whatever actual reason behind it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641567</id>
	<title>Re:People Failing To Grasp Chrome Just Like Androi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247130780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you're forgetting that Google just did try to get into the netbook market - with Android - and failed.</p><p>Hopefully Chrome will be a bit less underwhelming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you 're forgetting that Google just did try to get into the netbook market - with Android - and failed.Hopefully Chrome will be a bit less underwhelming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you're forgetting that Google just did try to get into the netbook market - with Android - and failed.Hopefully Chrome will be a bit less underwhelming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28666373</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247398260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure you know what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,\_uncertainty\_and\_doubt" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">FUD</a> [wikipedia.org] means...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure you know what FUD [ wikipedia.org ] means.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure you know what FUD [wikipedia.org] means...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247161680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does you company feel about keeping it's money in outside banks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does you company feel about keeping it 's money in outside banks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does you company feel about keeping it's money in outside banks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638375</id>
	<title>Re:WTF, Google. You're teaming up w/Adobe, too?</title>
	<author>Penguin Programmer</author>
	<datestamp>1247161620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser, which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects. But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as Gnash.</p></div><p>Gnash is all fine and good, except that it's a piece of shit and doesn't work.  Just like open-source Java.</p><p>Look, I like open source as much as the next guy (more, probably), but more than anything I like working software.  Google can either spend lots of man-hours making Gnash work properly with all the Flash out there on the web today, and then spend more man-hours keeping it up-to-date as Adobe adds new features that various popular websites take advantage of, or they can just partner with Adobe and use real Flash, spending just a few man-hours to integrate it into their system.  Google is a business, and while they may make some choices ideologically, in most cases they need to use the best tool for the job.  In this case, that tool is Flash.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser , which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects .
But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as Gnash.Gnash is all fine and good , except that it 's a piece of shit and does n't work .
Just like open-source Java.Look , I like open source as much as the next guy ( more , probably ) , but more than anything I like working software .
Google can either spend lots of man-hours making Gnash work properly with all the Flash out there on the web today , and then spend more man-hours keeping it up-to-date as Adobe adds new features that various popular websites take advantage of , or they can just partner with Adobe and use real Flash , spending just a few man-hours to integrate it into their system .
Google is a business , and while they may make some choices ideologically , in most cases they need to use the best tool for the job .
In this case , that tool is Flash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're building a new OS based on the Linux kernel + Chrome Browser, which is cool because these are both high-quality Free Software projects.
But then you wander off and sidle up to Adobe instead of working with Free Software such as Gnash.Gnash is all fine and good, except that it's a piece of shit and doesn't work.
Just like open-source Java.Look, I like open source as much as the next guy (more, probably), but more than anything I like working software.
Google can either spend lots of man-hours making Gnash work properly with all the Flash out there on the web today, and then spend more man-hours keeping it up-to-date as Adobe adds new features that various popular websites take advantage of, or they can just partner with Adobe and use real Flash, spending just a few man-hours to integrate it into their system.
Google is a business, and while they may make some choices ideologically, in most cases they need to use the best tool for the job.
In this case, that tool is Flash.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636969</id>
	<title>Re:Did anyone actually RTFA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247155620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone RTFA? I'd say you must be new here. Perhaps it's just old age settling in there old timer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone RTFA ?
I 'd say you must be new here .
Perhaps it 's just old age settling in there old timer : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone RTFA?
I'd say you must be new here.
Perhaps it's just old age settling in there old timer :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635577</id>
	<title>fr1st p0$t for gnaa and rikhard stawlman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247150400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.gnaa.us/" title="www.gnaa.us" rel="nofollow">8==C=O=C=K=S=L=A=P==D~~</a> [www.gnaa.us] fp for gnaa gay nigger association of america and rikhard stawlman</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>8 = = C = O = C = K = S = L = A = P = = D ~ ~ [ www.gnaa.us ] fp for gnaa gay nigger association of america and rikhard stawlman</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8==C=O=C=K=S=L=A=P==D~~ [www.gnaa.us] fp for gnaa gay nigger association of america and rikhard stawlman</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637549</id>
	<title>Re:Dell's netbooks</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1247157900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did have a bad experience with a 486 Acer long ago, so I understand your point...</p><p>However, today, I am perfectly happy with my Acer Aspire One, FWIW</p><p>Companies sometimes do change for the better, you know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did have a bad experience with a 486 Acer long ago , so I understand your point...However , today , I am perfectly happy with my Acer Aspire One , FWIWCompanies sometimes do change for the better , you know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did have a bad experience with a 486 Acer long ago, so I understand your point...However, today, I am perfectly happy with my Acer Aspire One, FWIWCompanies sometimes do change for the better, you know?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636095</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1247152620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>funny, not that long ago (this year anyway) 64-bit flash would insta-crash on youtube 100\% of the time.</p><p>I would hardly call that a long time ago (even in computer software terms).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>funny , not that long ago ( this year anyway ) 64-bit flash would insta-crash on youtube 100 \ % of the time.I would hardly call that a long time ago ( even in computer software terms ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>funny, not that long ago (this year anyway) 64-bit flash would insta-crash on youtube 100\% of the time.I would hardly call that a long time ago (even in computer software terms).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641299</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247172900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Badly, now that those banks collapse. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Badly , now that those banks collapse .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Badly, now that those banks collapse.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635507</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>theguyfromsaturn</author>
	<datestamp>1247150100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Presentations are not too bad, the spreadsheet is mediocre, and the word processor is abysmal.

Unfortunately, most people would want to use the word processor.

As a prof, I do use the spreadsheet regularly, shared among the TAs of my class to log assignment and exam marks.  As it allows shared editing, I always have the latest grades input from the TAs for the class.  I don't have to try to get individual spreadsheets and try to integrate the data at the last minute, hoping that everybody's names list match (even when provided... there are ALWAYS changes to the number and order of the names at then end of the semester on each spreadsheet).

So it is useful, in a very limited context.  What's more, Google episodes of no connectivity have clearly shown the severe limitations of cloud computing.  And I'm not event talkign security concerns here.  OpenOffice will remain my primary office suite for teh foreseeable future, thank you very much.  And besides, isn't Byzantine OS doing exactly what Chrome OS is supposed to do?  Why are we reinventing the wheel again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Presentations are not too bad , the spreadsheet is mediocre , and the word processor is abysmal .
Unfortunately , most people would want to use the word processor .
As a prof , I do use the spreadsheet regularly , shared among the TAs of my class to log assignment and exam marks .
As it allows shared editing , I always have the latest grades input from the TAs for the class .
I do n't have to try to get individual spreadsheets and try to integrate the data at the last minute , hoping that everybody 's names list match ( even when provided... there are ALWAYS changes to the number and order of the names at then end of the semester on each spreadsheet ) .
So it is useful , in a very limited context .
What 's more , Google episodes of no connectivity have clearly shown the severe limitations of cloud computing .
And I 'm not event talkign security concerns here .
OpenOffice will remain my primary office suite for teh foreseeable future , thank you very much .
And besides , is n't Byzantine OS doing exactly what Chrome OS is supposed to do ?
Why are we reinventing the wheel again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presentations are not too bad, the spreadsheet is mediocre, and the word processor is abysmal.
Unfortunately, most people would want to use the word processor.
As a prof, I do use the spreadsheet regularly, shared among the TAs of my class to log assignment and exam marks.
As it allows shared editing, I always have the latest grades input from the TAs for the class.
I don't have to try to get individual spreadsheets and try to integrate the data at the last minute, hoping that everybody's names list match (even when provided... there are ALWAYS changes to the number and order of the names at then end of the semester on each spreadsheet).
So it is useful, in a very limited context.
What's more, Google episodes of no connectivity have clearly shown the severe limitations of cloud computing.
And I'm not event talkign security concerns here.
OpenOffice will remain my primary office suite for teh foreseeable future, thank you very much.
And besides, isn't Byzantine OS doing exactly what Chrome OS is supposed to do?
Why are we reinventing the wheel again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638691</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247163000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux is not an Operating System.  Linux is a Kernel.  There is a reason Torvalds rants that out every so often.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is not an Operating System .
Linux is a Kernel .
There is a reason Torvalds rants that out every so often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is not an Operating System.
Linux is a Kernel.
There is a reason Torvalds rants that out every so often.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391</id>
	<title>Re:Marketing.....</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1247149380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to it</p></div><p>The real advantage it offers is that Google, a company that the average end user has heard of, is pushing it.  There's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from, unlike most Linux distros.  Hell, they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.</p><p>All this means it's actually in with a chance of competing with Windows on the desktop.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless this offers any real advantage I wo n't move to itThe real advantage it offers is that Google , a company that the average end user has heard of , is pushing it .
There 's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from , unlike most Linux distros .
Hell , they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.All this means it 's actually in with a chance of competing with Windows on the desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless this offers any real advantage I won't move to itThe real advantage it offers is that Google, a company that the average end user has heard of, is pushing it.
There's also half a chance that the OS will be user-friendly enough for the average end user not to run screaming from, unlike most Linux distros.
Hell, they may even be able to use it without ever having to see a command prompt.All this means it's actually in with a chance of competing with Windows on the desktop.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644541</id>
	<title>Re:I would absolutely love this</title>
	<author>TheVoice900</author>
	<datestamp>1247144640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's why there's Google Gears that lets you take your documents offline. So long as you as you are using your own laptop, which in my experience is usually the case with presenters, you are fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why there 's Google Gears that lets you take your documents offline .
So long as you as you are using your own laptop , which in my experience is usually the case with presenters , you are fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why there's Google Gears that lets you take your documents offline.
So long as you as you are using your own laptop, which in my experience is usually the case with presenters, you are fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636047</id>
	<title>Re:Google is not making an OS...</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1247152380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Google is not making an OS <b>kernel</b>... </i> </p><p>Fixed it for you. So, they're using a proven and tested OS kernel instead of making their own from scratch. So?? That really doesn't tell you much, by that I mean, just knowing that they use the Linux kernel doesn't allow you to infer much about what it's actually gonna be like as an OS.

</p><p>Also, Linux is not an OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is not making an OS kernel... Fixed it for you .
So , they 're using a proven and tested OS kernel instead of making their own from scratch .
So ? ? That really does n't tell you much , by that I mean , just knowing that they use the Linux kernel does n't allow you to infer much about what it 's actually gon na be like as an OS .
Also , Linux is not an OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Google is not making an OS kernel...  Fixed it for you.
So, they're using a proven and tested OS kernel instead of making their own from scratch.
So?? That really doesn't tell you much, by that I mean, just knowing that they use the Linux kernel doesn't allow you to infer much about what it's actually gonna be like as an OS.
Also, Linux is not an OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481</id>
	<title>Re:Air</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247149980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why can't an open source version of the flash library be created?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why ca n't an open source version of the flash library be created ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why can't an open source version of the flash library be created?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635697</id>
	<title>Re:Acrobat, huh</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1247150940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't matter. Based on the number of security exploits found in Adobe software over the last couple of years, I'm of the opinion that they shouldn't be allowed to write software for public consumption anymore. It seems that every week there's another PDF  or Flash exploit out. If Google is promoting the OS based on how secure it is, they may want to develop their own Flash and PDF viewers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't matter .
Based on the number of security exploits found in Adobe software over the last couple of years , I 'm of the opinion that they should n't be allowed to write software for public consumption anymore .
It seems that every week there 's another PDF or Flash exploit out .
If Google is promoting the OS based on how secure it is , they may want to develop their own Flash and PDF viewers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't matter.
Based on the number of security exploits found in Adobe software over the last couple of years, I'm of the opinion that they shouldn't be allowed to write software for public consumption anymore.
It seems that every week there's another PDF  or Flash exploit out.
If Google is promoting the OS based on how secure it is, they may want to develop their own Flash and PDF viewers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642397</id>
	<title>Re:Why Dell isn't on the list</title>
	<author>binkzz</author>
	<datestamp>1247134620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This annoys me to no end. Not just of Dell, but pretty much every single computer manufacturer. "Blahdeblah recommends Windows Vista Home Premium". When everyone does it, it feels like propaganda. But when they do it, their brand loses credit with me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This annoys me to no end .
Not just of Dell , but pretty much every single computer manufacturer .
" Blahdeblah recommends Windows Vista Home Premium " .
When everyone does it , it feels like propaganda .
But when they do it , their brand loses credit with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This annoys me to no end.
Not just of Dell, but pretty much every single computer manufacturer.
"Blahdeblah recommends Windows Vista Home Premium".
When everyone does it, it feels like propaganda.
But when they do it, their brand loses credit with me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449</id>
	<title>2010 will be the year of Linux</title>
	<author>Norsefire</author>
	<datestamp>1247149740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>on the browser.</htmltext>
<tokenext>on the browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the browser.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646071</id>
	<title>Re:2010 will be the year of Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247161920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In soviet russia, browser runs on linux!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet russia , browser runs on linux !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet russia, browser runs on linux!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28666373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28653235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28649197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638411
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28650489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_09_1243231_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28653235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637623
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28650489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635421
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635391
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638457
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637985
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642803
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28666373
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28649197
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646459
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642901
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641261
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643119
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637329
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638629
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635459
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635455
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638389
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647279
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640265
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28644261
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641299
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635783
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636281
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635253
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641109
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28643243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635371
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635881
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636599
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635585
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635519
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636095
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637823
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28645299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635481
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636251
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28640149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28641527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28646611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635491
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28647737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28638081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_09_1243231.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28635583
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28642345
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28651233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637213
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28639639
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28636371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_09_1243231.28637757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
