<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_08_186205</id>
	<title>Human Sperm Produced In the Laboratory</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1247077200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>duh P3rf3ss3r writes <i>"The BBC is carrying a report from a team of researchers at <a href="http://www.ncl.ac.uk/">Newcastle University</a> who claim to have developed a the first 'artificial' human sperm from stem cells. The research, reported in the journal <a href="http://www.liebertpub.com/products/product.aspx?pid=125">Stem Cells and Development</a>, involved selecting meristematic germ cells from a human embryonic stem cell culture and inducing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meiosis">meiosis</a>, thus producing a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamete">haploid gamete</a>. The authors claim that the resulting sperm are fully formed, mature, human sperm cells but the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>duh P3rf3ss3r writes " The BBC is carrying a report from a team of researchers at Newcastle University who claim to have developed a the first 'artificial ' human sperm from stem cells .
The research , reported in the journal Stem Cells and Development , involved selecting meristematic germ cells from a human embryonic stem cell culture and inducing meiosis , thus producing a haploid gamete .
The authors claim that the resulting sperm are fully formed , mature , human sperm cells but the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>duh P3rf3ss3r writes "The BBC is carrying a report from a team of researchers at Newcastle University who claim to have developed a the first 'artificial' human sperm from stem cells.
The research, reported in the journal Stem Cells and Development, involved selecting meristematic germ cells from a human embryonic stem cell culture and inducing meiosis, thus producing a haploid gamete.
The authors claim that the resulting sperm are fully formed, mature, human sperm cells but the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630107</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>rachit</author>
	<datestamp>1247057400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>thereby allowing her to impregnate <b>herself</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</b></p> </div><p>Gives real meaning to the saying "go fuck yourself".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>thereby allowing her to impregnate herself .
Gives real meaning to the saying " go fuck yourself " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> thereby allowing her to impregnate herself .
Gives real meaning to the saying "go fuck yourself".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629485</id>
	<title>Re:Now how will Slashdotters get laid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247053560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought sexLife was declared as a variable of type unsigned, not a type int.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought sexLife was declared as a variable of type unsigned , not a type int .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought sexLife was declared as a variable of type unsigned, not a type int.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657481</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1247243400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage. That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.</p></div><p>I think we will need a way to make egg cells from stem cells, not sperm.<br>

Which we have the material for - get two male stem cells, splice the X chromosome out and put in the other, and volia! An XX stem cell ready to mature into an egg. Seems that women cannot reproduce without men, but men can (eventually) reproduce without women!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos ; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo , they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage .
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome , which female cells do not contain , may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.I think we will need a way to make egg cells from stem cells , not sperm .
Which we have the material for - get two male stem cells , splice the X chromosome out and put in the other , and volia !
An XX stem cell ready to mature into an egg .
Seems that women can not reproduce without men , but men can ( eventually ) reproduce without women !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage.
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.I think we will need a way to make egg cells from stem cells, not sperm.
Which we have the material for - get two male stem cells, splice the X chromosome out and put in the other, and volia!
An XX stem cell ready to mature into an egg.
Seems that women cannot reproduce without men, but men can (eventually) reproduce without women!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626233</id>
	<title>Re:Sperm Shortage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Getting them from a lesbian's spouse rather than needing a man to donate the sperm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>God hasn't anyone ever read Ninja High School? There was like a 2+ issue story in there about the Tetra-men or something and the Venusians (buncha technologically advanced lesbian chicks who'd just made a giant sperm bank and killed all the men millenia before) going to steal them to improve their collective sperm pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting them from a lesbian 's spouse rather than needing a man to donate the sperm : DGod has n't anyone ever read Ninja High School ?
There was like a 2 + issue story in there about the Tetra-men or something and the Venusians ( buncha technologically advanced lesbian chicks who 'd just made a giant sperm bank and killed all the men millenia before ) going to steal them to improve their collective sperm pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting them from a lesbian's spouse rather than needing a man to donate the sperm :DGod hasn't anyone ever read Ninja High School?
There was like a 2+ issue story in there about the Tetra-men or something and the Venusians (buncha technologically advanced lesbian chicks who'd just made a giant sperm bank and killed all the men millenia before) going to steal them to improve their collective sperm pool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626179</id>
	<title>RTFM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sperm meet the 4 basic descriptions for sperm: have 23 chromosomes, have head and tail, have egg-activating proteins, and swim.  They are not exact copies of sperm, and, more importantly, only sperm made from male cells actually matured; those from female cells didn't.<br><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909164,00.html" title="time.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909164,00.html</a> [time.com]<br>Post AC because I'm in a grouchy mood and commenting on something I usually don't comment on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sperm meet the 4 basic descriptions for sperm : have 23 chromosomes , have head and tail , have egg-activating proteins , and swim .
They are not exact copies of sperm , and , more importantly , only sperm made from male cells actually matured ; those from female cells did n't.http : //www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909164,00.html [ time.com ] Post AC because I 'm in a grouchy mood and commenting on something I usually do n't comment on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sperm meet the 4 basic descriptions for sperm: have 23 chromosomes, have head and tail, have egg-activating proteins, and swim.
They are not exact copies of sperm, and, more importantly, only sperm made from male cells actually matured; those from female cells didn't.http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909164,00.html [time.com]Post AC because I'm in a grouchy mood and commenting on something I usually don't comment on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627389</id>
	<title>Huge waste of tax dollars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247086080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We give these scientists grant money to build labs to work on scientific discoveries. And they turn around and spend all day masturbating in the labs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We give these scientists grant money to build labs to work on scientific discoveries .
And they turn around and spend all day masturbating in the labs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We give these scientists grant money to build labs to work on scientific discoveries.
And they turn around and spend all day masturbating in the labs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247046060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And, on a chilling (for me) twist, if they took stem cells from a woman, they could generate some sperm for her, <b>thereby allowing her to impregnate <b>herself</b> .</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>And , on a chilling ( for me ) twist , if they took stem cells from a woman , they could generate some sperm for her , thereby allowing her to impregnate herself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, on a chilling (for me) twist, if they took stem cells from a woman, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby allowing her to impregnate herself .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There goes the male sex...?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes the male sex... ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes the male sex...?
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631063</id>
	<title>Wrong fucking date representation</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1247063340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its 2009/07/08 for christ sakes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its 2009/07/08 for christ sakes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its 2009/07/08 for christ sakes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638821</id>
	<title>cya later fellow men...</title>
	<author>Mattman723</author>
	<datestamp>1247163540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who's read Y: The Last Man...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's read Y : The Last Man.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's read Y: The Last Man...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628617</id>
	<title>Very Big Deal</title>
	<author>PleaseFearMe</author>
	<datestamp>1247048940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the male humans can die, and the females can still live on.  Now, that is a big deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the male humans can die , and the females can still live on .
Now , that is a big deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the male humans can die, and the females can still live on.
Now, that is a big deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626665</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1247083320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if you won't survive the following 20 years. You see next step is the artificial uterus, quickly followed by the artificial boob. I believe it was Joseph whom uttered the words "seven years of plenty and seven years of famine," although this is the other way around.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you wo n't survive the following 20 years .
You see next step is the artificial uterus , quickly followed by the artificial boob .
I believe it was Joseph whom uttered the words " seven years of plenty and seven years of famine , " although this is the other way around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you won't survive the following 20 years.
You see next step is the artificial uterus, quickly followed by the artificial boob.
I believe it was Joseph whom uttered the words "seven years of plenty and seven years of famine," although this is the other way around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632589</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1247077020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!!</p></div></blockquote><p>
Thats still 29 days away?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009 ! ! ! !
Thats still 29 days away ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!!
Thats still 29 days away?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626343</id>
	<title>Very Low Profile Journal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the researchers had sufficient evidence to back their claim, it would be published in Nature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the researchers had sufficient evidence to back their claim , it would be published in Nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the researchers had sufficient evidence to back their claim, it would be published in Nature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635737</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247151120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has many more useful purposes, given it can be refined into something useful</p><p>I had a friend who got cancer and was never told to make a donation prior to treatment......the chemo sterilized him.</p><p>I'm sure there are quite a few people born sterile, or otherwise become so prior to their reproductive stage in life.</p><p>And as others below said...i don't see how it's a big can of worms for anyone who isn't a religious zealot that otherwise will respect another persons humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has many more useful purposes , given it can be refined into something usefulI had a friend who got cancer and was never told to make a donation prior to treatment......the chemo sterilized him.I 'm sure there are quite a few people born sterile , or otherwise become so prior to their reproductive stage in life.And as others below said...i do n't see how it 's a big can of worms for anyone who is n't a religious zealot that otherwise will respect another persons humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has many more useful purposes, given it can be refined into something usefulI had a friend who got cancer and was never told to make a donation prior to treatment......the chemo sterilized him.I'm sure there are quite a few people born sterile, or otherwise become so prior to their reproductive stage in life.And as others below said...i don't see how it's a big can of worms for anyone who isn't a religious zealot that otherwise will respect another persons humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630787</id>
	<title>Re:I can't believe it's not butter!</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1247061300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I prefer the term "synthetic person" myself 8)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I prefer the term " synthetic person " myself 8 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I prefer the term "synthetic person" myself 8)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you almost generated humor there.  If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.</p><p>The big deal though is, I would assume actually several things</p><p>1.  It's interesting enough that we can generate them in vitro.  How sperm are made is better known than some other cell types, but now even the parts we don't know can be more easily studied, since you can watch it in a microscope easier.  Changing conditions to determine what sperm need to develop is also going to be easier in a dish than it would to change conditions in a mouse testicle (I would assume, I've never tried.)  For example, some big pharmecutical company could start a high-throughput screen of drugs on the process, they could identify some chemicals which would block the process and maybe make a male birth control pill.  Maybe.  There are many other applications for the technology too I'd assume.</p><p>2.  We're close to curing some types of male sterility.  If, say, you had testicular cancer or other... uh... trauma to your testicles that prevented you from generating your own sperm, this is a step toward that.  You could take some of your cells (like skin cells), make them pluripotent (like embryonic stem cells), generate sperm from them, and then undergo IVF.</p><p>At least, a millionaire could.  If he were willing to sort out the ethics of it for himself.  Would be kind of stupid if you ask me, but so are a lot of things people spend their money on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you almost generated humor there .
If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.The big deal though is , I would assume actually several things1 .
It 's interesting enough that we can generate them in vitro .
How sperm are made is better known than some other cell types , but now even the parts we do n't know can be more easily studied , since you can watch it in a microscope easier .
Changing conditions to determine what sperm need to develop is also going to be easier in a dish than it would to change conditions in a mouse testicle ( I would assume , I 've never tried .
) For example , some big pharmecutical company could start a high-throughput screen of drugs on the process , they could identify some chemicals which would block the process and maybe make a male birth control pill .
Maybe. There are many other applications for the technology too I 'd assume.2 .
We 're close to curing some types of male sterility .
If , say , you had testicular cancer or other... uh... trauma to your testicles that prevented you from generating your own sperm , this is a step toward that .
You could take some of your cells ( like skin cells ) , make them pluripotent ( like embryonic stem cells ) , generate sperm from them , and then undergo IVF.At least , a millionaire could .
If he were willing to sort out the ethics of it for himself .
Would be kind of stupid if you ask me , but so are a lot of things people spend their money on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you almost generated humor there.
If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.The big deal though is, I would assume actually several things1.
It's interesting enough that we can generate them in vitro.
How sperm are made is better known than some other cell types, but now even the parts we don't know can be more easily studied, since you can watch it in a microscope easier.
Changing conditions to determine what sperm need to develop is also going to be easier in a dish than it would to change conditions in a mouse testicle (I would assume, I've never tried.
)  For example, some big pharmecutical company could start a high-throughput screen of drugs on the process, they could identify some chemicals which would block the process and maybe make a male birth control pill.
Maybe.  There are many other applications for the technology too I'd assume.2.
We're close to curing some types of male sterility.
If, say, you had testicular cancer or other... uh... trauma to your testicles that prevented you from generating your own sperm, this is a step toward that.
You could take some of your cells (like skin cells), make them pluripotent (like embryonic stem cells), generate sperm from them, and then undergo IVF.At least, a millionaire could.
If he were willing to sort out the ethics of it for himself.
Would be kind of stupid if you ask me, but so are a lot of things people spend their money on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626583</id>
	<title>Fucking Lame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247083020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, we just want to see what diseases we can thwart with stem cell research...lol...Riiiight buddy. Its obvious that the natural course of scientific examination of stem cells is to eventually make fake sperm!</p><p>And those of us who dont want tax dollars to fund this kind of shit...well I guess we just have to deal. Im sure glad I belong to the 'common goal' of misdirected ethics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , we just want to see what diseases we can thwart with stem cell research...lol...Riiiight buddy .
Its obvious that the natural course of scientific examination of stem cells is to eventually make fake sperm ! And those of us who dont want tax dollars to fund this kind of shit...well I guess we just have to deal .
Im sure glad I belong to the 'common goal ' of misdirected ethics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, we just want to see what diseases we can thwart with stem cell research...lol...Riiiight buddy.
Its obvious that the natural course of scientific examination of stem cells is to eventually make fake sperm!And those of us who dont want tax dollars to fund this kind of shit...well I guess we just have to deal.
Im sure glad I belong to the 'common goal' of misdirected ethics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626775</id>
	<title>really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247083740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation."</p><p>"No! YOUR synthetic gametes are at inferior levels of maturation!"</p><p>"Nu uhh! YOURS ARE!"</p><p>"SHUT UP!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation. " " No !
YOUR synthetic gametes are at inferior levels of maturation !
" " Nu uhh !
YOURS ARE !
" " SHUT UP !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...the announcement has been greeted with mixed reaction from colleagues who claim the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation.""No!
YOUR synthetic gametes are at inferior levels of maturation!
""Nu uhh!
YOURS ARE!
""SHUT UP!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631095</id>
	<title>I  make this shit...</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1247063580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... In my pants!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... In my pants !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... In my pants!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799</id>
	<title>Men No Longer Needed</title>
	<author>TrailerTrash</author>
	<datestamp>1247083860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not that we necessarily were, according to some...</p><p>If this procedure became easy/commonplace, it would greatly facilitate lesbian genertic reproduction of two women, vs. one woman and a sperm donor. Since the stem cell used to create sperm would be XX, all resulting children would be female. Interesting to think of a slight but perceptible shift to a significant female majority world population (or population in developed countries).</p><p>Possible consequences: less war; economic trouble for the TV and gaming industries; the slow decline of monster trucks; the world domination of Oprah and The View.</p><p>I for one welcome our new female overlords. Mistress. *grovel*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that we necessarily were , according to some...If this procedure became easy/commonplace , it would greatly facilitate lesbian genertic reproduction of two women , vs. one woman and a sperm donor .
Since the stem cell used to create sperm would be XX , all resulting children would be female .
Interesting to think of a slight but perceptible shift to a significant female majority world population ( or population in developed countries ) .Possible consequences : less war ; economic trouble for the TV and gaming industries ; the slow decline of monster trucks ; the world domination of Oprah and The View.I for one welcome our new female overlords .
Mistress. * grovel *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that we necessarily were, according to some...If this procedure became easy/commonplace, it would greatly facilitate lesbian genertic reproduction of two women, vs. one woman and a sperm donor.
Since the stem cell used to create sperm would be XX, all resulting children would be female.
Interesting to think of a slight but perceptible shift to a significant female majority world population (or population in developed countries).Possible consequences: less war; economic trouble for the TV and gaming industries; the slow decline of monster trucks; the world domination of Oprah and The View.I for one welcome our new female overlords.
Mistress. *grovel*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627007</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1247084640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, at the moment, they're creating this "sperm" by killing existing viable embryos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at the moment , they 're creating this " sperm " by killing existing viable embryos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at the moment, they're creating this "sperm" by killing existing viable embryos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628065</id>
	<title>Re:Mandatory...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1247046240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I for one, welcome our female overlords.</p></div><p>I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their sugar caves.  In fact, forget the rounding up others, I'll toil just fine.  And forget the blackjack.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one , welcome our female overlords.I 'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality , I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their sugar caves .
In fact , forget the rounding up others , I 'll toil just fine .
And forget the blackjack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one, welcome our female overlords.I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their sugar caves.
In fact, forget the rounding up others, I'll toil just fine.
And forget the blackjack.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626123</id>
	<title>i completely read that as...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of <b>masturbation</b>."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of masturbation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of masturbation.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627591</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247043900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The male sex is usually gone 1 year after the marriage certificate is signed anyway. Ask any group of married couples with kids. Just check in her dresser drawer or closet and you find where it went to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The male sex is usually gone 1 year after the marriage certificate is signed anyway .
Ask any group of married couples with kids .
Just check in her dresser drawer or closet and you find where it went to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The male sex is usually gone 1 year after the marriage certificate is signed anyway.
Ask any group of married couples with kids.
Just check in her dresser drawer or closet and you find where it went to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638497</id>
	<title>A certain comic book series anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247162160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do I have a feeling that soon all of the male mammals of this world will suddenly die?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do I have a feeling that soon all of the male mammals of this world will suddenly die ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do I have a feeling that soon all of the male mammals of this world will suddenly die?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626927</id>
	<title>Actually... we are one step closer to...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1247084340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Embryo space colonization - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryo\_space\_colonization" title="wikipedia.org">just send a lab.</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>No humans need to make the trip.<br>Not so great for the human civilization, but various religious and minority ideological groups <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Songs\_of\_Distant\_Earth" title="wikipedia.org">will love it.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Embryo space colonization - just send a lab .
[ wikipedia.org ] No humans need to make the trip.Not so great for the human civilization , but various religious and minority ideological groups will love it .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Embryo space colonization - just send a lab.
[wikipedia.org]No humans need to make the trip.Not so great for the human civilization, but various religious and minority ideological groups will love it.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626281</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>Defakto</author>
	<datestamp>1247082120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's unethical about this?</p></div><p>The use would be the unethical portion and science because there is no guarantee that what results from the sperm-egg coupling using one of this would be a viable, working person.  Religious and moral beliefs aside I think this is a great thing. It may not now help us understand how our bodies work but it may lead to it in the future.  I'm a firm believer that cloning has a huge potential in the long term for helping out humanity as a race.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's unethical about this ? The use would be the unethical portion and science because there is no guarantee that what results from the sperm-egg coupling using one of this would be a viable , working person .
Religious and moral beliefs aside I think this is a great thing .
It may not now help us understand how our bodies work but it may lead to it in the future .
I 'm a firm believer that cloning has a huge potential in the long term for helping out humanity as a race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's unethical about this?The use would be the unethical portion and science because there is no guarantee that what results from the sperm-egg coupling using one of this would be a viable, working person.
Religious and moral beliefs aside I think this is a great thing.
It may not now help us understand how our bodies work but it may lead to it in the future.
I'm a firm believer that cloning has a huge potential in the long term for helping out humanity as a race.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627773</id>
	<title>Re:Men No Longer Needed</title>
	<author>SupremoMan</author>
	<datestamp>1247044800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1)There is already more women than men.</p><p>2)There is not that many Lesbians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) There is already more women than men.2 ) There is not that many Lesbians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1)There is already more women than men.2)There is not that many Lesbians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626693</id>
	<title>The GF:s reply to this...</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1247083440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Cool! We don't need you guys anymore."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Cool !
We do n't need you guys anymore .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Cool!
We don't need you guys anymore.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631773</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>BountyX</author>
	<datestamp>1247068680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>clinics would be required to have consent before this procedure takes place. it would be heavily regulated i image.</htmltext>
<tokenext>clinics would be required to have consent before this procedure takes place .
it would be heavily regulated i image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>clinics would be required to have consent before this procedure takes place.
it would be heavily regulated i image.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627697</id>
	<title>Re:This also from science today:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247044560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead.</i></p><p>Actually, not to surprise bubble... But It has been done via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear\_transmutation" title="wikipedia.org">nuclear transmutation</a> [wikipedia.org] in labs <a href="http://chemistry.about.com/cs/generalchemistry/a/aa050601a.htm" title="about.com">since the 1970s</a> [about.com].</p><p>Before you get your science kits together to make it rich there are three caveats.</p><p>One... It requires a nuclear reactor.<br>Two... It products only a few atoms of gold far less than the cost of energy to make.<br>Three... The Gold is radioactive.</p><p>But if you got a nuclear reactor and plenty of urianium and mercury to burn, go right ahead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead.Actually , not to surprise bubble... But It has been done via nuclear transmutation [ wikipedia.org ] in labs since the 1970s [ about.com ] .Before you get your science kits together to make it rich there are three caveats.One... It requires a nuclear reactor.Two... It products only a few atoms of gold far less than the cost of energy to make.Three... The Gold is radioactive.But if you got a nuclear reactor and plenty of urianium and mercury to burn , go right ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead.Actually, not to surprise bubble... But It has been done via nuclear transmutation [wikipedia.org] in labs since the 1970s [about.com].Before you get your science kits together to make it rich there are three caveats.One... It requires a nuclear reactor.Two... It products only a few atoms of gold far less than the cost of energy to make.Three... The Gold is radioactive.But if you got a nuclear reactor and plenty of urianium and mercury to burn, go right ahead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626847</id>
	<title>So Clevon should regain full reproductive function</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1247084040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get your hands off my junk!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get your hands off my junk !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get your hands off my junk!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626239</id>
	<title>Ohh the sperm cells connected to the egg-cell...</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1247081940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Check that off the list of what nature can do and now man can do.<br>
But lets forget making spare parts, lets do gene splicing.<br>
I want a new blanket-jackson.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check that off the list of what nature can do and now man can do .
But lets forget making spare parts , lets do gene splicing .
I want a new blanket-jackson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check that off the list of what nature can do and now man can do.
But lets forget making spare parts, lets do gene splicing.
I want a new blanket-jackson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629071</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Palshife</author>
	<datestamp>1247051040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides the obvious? Homosexual couples can't currently conceive children. This could grant that ability. That's pretty huge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides the obvious ?
Homosexual couples ca n't currently conceive children .
This could grant that ability .
That 's pretty huge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides the obvious?
Homosexual couples can't currently conceive children.
This could grant that ability.
That's pretty huge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630395</id>
	<title>Women of the world, LISTEN UP!  Now we can go it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247058720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Women of the world, LISTEN UP!  Now we can go it alone.  First, KILL ALL THE MEN.  Second, let's get it on !!  A world of women, and only women.  Think of the beauty, the peace, the lesbo sex !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Women of the world , LISTEN UP !
Now we can go it alone .
First , KILL ALL THE MEN .
Second , let 's get it on ! !
A world of women , and only women .
Think of the beauty , the peace , the lesbo sex ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Women of the world, LISTEN UP!
Now we can go it alone.
First, KILL ALL THE MEN.
Second, let's get it on !!
A world of women, and only women.
Think of the beauty, the peace, the lesbo sex !!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633549</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247133000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its been happening for quite some time now. Havent you seen the Amazon princess from the Justice League? How else do you suppose they have an all female island?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its been happening for quite some time now .
Havent you seen the Amazon princess from the Justice League ?
How else do you suppose they have an all female island ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its been happening for quite some time now.
Havent you seen the Amazon princess from the Justice League?
How else do you suppose they have an all female island?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633865</id>
	<title>Uh-oh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247136060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And women always said they didn't need men... now look what you've done! &gt;=[. We won't hear the end of it now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And women always said they did n't need men... now look what you 've done !
&gt; = [ . We wo n't hear the end of it now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And women always said they didn't need men... now look what you've done!
&gt;=[. We won't hear the end of it now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631897</id>
	<title>Re:Moral issues?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247069580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] and there are no souls [...]</p></div><p>You sound so sure about that, but what does it even mean?  Can you describe self-awareness with electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, string theory?  There is definitely a gap in our knowledge about consciousness.

</p><p>BTW, I don't disagree with your general argument about progression.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] and there are no souls [ ... ] You sound so sure about that , but what does it even mean ?
Can you describe self-awareness with electromagnetism , quantum mechanics , string theory ?
There is definitely a gap in our knowledge about consciousness .
BTW , I do n't disagree with your general argument about progression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] and there are no souls [...]You sound so sure about that, but what does it even mean?
Can you describe self-awareness with electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, string theory?
There is definitely a gap in our knowledge about consciousness.
BTW, I don't disagree with your general argument about progression.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630769</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1247061060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But there are some who cant. No imagine if there is someone who is a carrier of a male line genetic disease. Maybe they would still like the chance to have sperm created and selected without this defect. However I see the problem is what diseases would you correct for, what are the chances of other abnormalities with this process.<br>Still a very dangerous and questionable game to play with potential peoples lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But there are some who cant .
No imagine if there is someone who is a carrier of a male line genetic disease .
Maybe they would still like the chance to have sperm created and selected without this defect .
However I see the problem is what diseases would you correct for , what are the chances of other abnormalities with this process.Still a very dangerous and questionable game to play with potential peoples lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there are some who cant.
No imagine if there is someone who is a carrier of a male line genetic disease.
Maybe they would still like the chance to have sperm created and selected without this defect.
However I see the problem is what diseases would you correct for, what are the chances of other abnormalities with this process.Still a very dangerous and questionable game to play with potential peoples lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626061</id>
	<title>Why the need?</title>
	<author>XPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1247081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a group of wonderful gents right here that would be delighted to give their precious sperm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a group of wonderful gents right here that would be delighted to give their precious sperm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a group of wonderful gents right here that would be delighted to give their precious sperm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626403</id>
	<title>Scientists can produce it in a lab?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been producing it in a kleenex for years...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been producing it in a kleenex for years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been producing it in a kleenex for years...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633795</id>
	<title>natural selection be damned..lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247135340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>infertility is nature's way of telling you not to reproduce..</p><p>then again, impotence was too...NOT ANY MORE!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p><p>next step: reversing menopause. "for that poor businesswoman that didn't have time for kids".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>infertility is nature 's way of telling you not to reproduce..then again , impotence was too...NOT ANY MORE !
: pnext step : reversing menopause .
" for that poor businesswoman that did n't have time for kids " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>infertility is nature's way of telling you not to reproduce..then again, impotence was too...NOT ANY MORE!
:pnext step: reversing menopause.
"for that poor businesswoman that didn't have time for kids".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630103</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247057340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course there is.  But if you can't see it now then I'm afraid nothing I can say will convince you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course there is .
But if you ca n't see it now then I 'm afraid nothing I can say will convince you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course there is.
But if you can't see it now then I'm afraid nothing I can say will convince you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630801</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247061420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>by generate I bet you mean secrete</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by generate I bet you mean secrete</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by generate I bet you mean secrete</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627043</id>
	<title>Re:Now how will Slashdotters get laid?</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1247084760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plummet? So now people will start promising Slashdotters they will have sex with them and never deliver? THE AGONY!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plummet ?
So now people will start promising Slashdotters they will have sex with them and never deliver ?
THE AGONY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plummet?
So now people will start promising Slashdotters they will have sex with them and never deliver?
THE AGONY!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626189</id>
	<title>You're a Catholic the moment Lab came, because...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Every sperm is sacred,<br>Every sperm is great,<br>If a sperm is wasted,<br>God gets quite irate."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Every sperm is sacred,Every sperm is great,If a sperm is wasted,God gets quite irate .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Every sperm is sacred,Every sperm is great,If a sperm is wasted,God gets quite irate.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628775</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247049720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People are stupid.  Homosexual couples <i>adopting children</i> is considered a hot topic in some communities.  Compared to that, this is huge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People are stupid .
Homosexual couples adopting children is considered a hot topic in some communities .
Compared to that , this is huge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are stupid.
Homosexual couples adopting children is considered a hot topic in some communities.
Compared to that, this is huge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</id>
	<title>Moral issues?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247044500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ethical concerns?   I'm getting tired of silly ideological grounds against genetic manipulation.  "Natural" does not mean better," and so long as nobody is hurt by doing this then there's no problem.  People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progress.  All humans are essentially biological machines, and there are no souls, and the faster people realize that the sooner we can progress past our silly human limitations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ethical concerns ?
I 'm getting tired of silly ideological grounds against genetic manipulation .
" Natural " does not mean better , " and so long as nobody is hurt by doing this then there 's no problem .
People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progress .
All humans are essentially biological machines , and there are no souls , and the faster people realize that the sooner we can progress past our silly human limitations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ethical concerns?
I'm getting tired of silly ideological grounds against genetic manipulation.
"Natural" does not mean better," and so long as nobody is hurt by doing this then there's no problem.
People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progress.
All humans are essentially biological machines, and there are no souls, and the faster people realize that the sooner we can progress past our silly human limitations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631341</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>bobdevine</author>
	<datestamp>1247065680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!!</p></div><p>For full effect, you needed to read the article at 34 minutes past noon. That would be at 12:34:56 07/08/09</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009 ! ! !
! For full effect , you needed to read the article at 34 minutes past noon .
That would be at 12 : 34 : 56 07/08/09</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!
!For full effect, you needed to read the article at 34 minutes past noon.
That would be at 12:34:56 07/08/09
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630055</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247057160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And where would those women get the Y chromosome from?</p><p>Not from me, because I will not be the idiot that pays for child support, <em>and did not even get any sex for it</em>! (And if it is a women, and she knows that you are the father, she <em>will</em> take every last cent from you! ^^)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And where would those women get the Y chromosome from ? Not from me , because I will not be the idiot that pays for child support , and did not even get any sex for it !
( And if it is a women , and she knows that you are the father , she will take every last cent from you !
^ ^ )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And where would those women get the Y chromosome from?Not from me, because I will not be the idiot that pays for child support, and did not even get any sex for it!
(And if it is a women, and she knows that you are the father, she will take every last cent from you!
^^)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28645831</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>SaoirseC</author>
	<datestamp>1247158260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think stem cells are found in blood- just umbilical cord blood and bone marrow. It would be rather difficult, I think, to extract bone marrow from a person without their knowledge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think stem cells are found in blood- just umbilical cord blood and bone marrow .
It would be rather difficult , I think , to extract bone marrow from a person without their knowledge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think stem cells are found in blood- just umbilical cord blood and bone marrow.
It would be rather difficult, I think, to extract bone marrow from a person without their knowledge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973</id>
	<title>This also from science today:</title>
	<author>PingSpike</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're also working to develop a process that allows the transformation of gold into lead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632671</id>
	<title>Where?</title>
	<author>dark grep</author>
	<datestamp>1247077980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Makes a change from producing it in the lavatory I guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes a change from producing it in the lavatory I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes a change from producing it in the lavatory I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626091</id>
	<title>Stock prices of sperm donors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aka men has suddenly collapsed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>aka men has suddenly collapsed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aka men has suddenly collapsed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626023</id>
	<title>Misread</title>
	<author>StDoodle</author>
	<datestamp>1247081220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it any surprise that, with such an article, I had to do a double-take to properly read "...inferior levels of maturation."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it any surprise that , with such an article , I had to do a double-take to properly read " ...inferior levels of maturation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it any surprise that, with such an article, I had to do a double-take to properly read "...inferior levels of maturation.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632513</id>
	<title>Cue the feminist stories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247076120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One common story when this sort of thing comes up is the idea that a woman would be able to then impregnate another woman by putting her X chromosome into a sperm.</p><p>I suppose it's technically true, though such a pairing could only ever produce a female child. It would be interesting... it won't be long before the first child is produced with all female parents. What a fucked up kid that will be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One common story when this sort of thing comes up is the idea that a woman would be able to then impregnate another woman by putting her X chromosome into a sperm.I suppose it 's technically true , though such a pairing could only ever produce a female child .
It would be interesting... it wo n't be long before the first child is produced with all female parents .
What a fucked up kid that will be : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One common story when this sort of thing comes up is the idea that a woman would be able to then impregnate another woman by putting her X chromosome into a sperm.I suppose it's technically true, though such a pairing could only ever produce a female child.
It would be interesting... it won't be long before the first child is produced with all female parents.
What a fucked up kid that will be :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629693</id>
	<title>Great, another article about...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247054760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>laboratory-grown food for Commander Taco!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>laboratory-grown food for Commander Taco !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>laboratory-grown food for Commander Taco!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634693</id>
	<title>Re:Moral issues?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247144940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well actually, you can't prove there are no souls any more than I can prove there are. So you shoot yourself in the foot. Did it hurt?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well actually , you ca n't prove there are no souls any more than I can prove there are .
So you shoot yourself in the foot .
Did it hurt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well actually, you can't prove there are no souls any more than I can prove there are.
So you shoot yourself in the foot.
Did it hurt?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629061</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247050980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is also exciting for us male-to-female transsexuals who can't produce sperm due to hormones or surgery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is also exciting for us male-to-female transsexuals who ca n't produce sperm due to hormones or surgery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is also exciting for us male-to-female transsexuals who can't produce sperm due to hormones or surgery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28655181</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1247221920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know.  Once they manage to suppress DNA errors in narrow breeding pools would you suggest there would still be some kind of ethical or moral problem with siblings having children together?  Or parent/offspring couples?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know .
Once they manage to suppress DNA errors in narrow breeding pools would you suggest there would still be some kind of ethical or moral problem with siblings having children together ?
Or parent/offspring couples ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know.
Once they manage to suppress DNA errors in narrow breeding pools would you suggest there would still be some kind of ethical or moral problem with siblings having children together?
Or parent/offspring couples?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634971</id>
	<title>Im relieved...</title>
	<author>Sinn3d</author>
	<datestamp>1247147100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank goodness we found an answer to the growing shortage of sperm. Now to find a new way to artificially create grains of sand...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank goodness we found an answer to the growing shortage of sperm .
Now to find a new way to artificially create grains of sand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank goodness we found an answer to the growing shortage of sperm.
Now to find a new way to artificially create grains of sand...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626373</id>
	<title>Now here's an interesting future</title>
	<author>tinkertim</author>
	<datestamp>1247082360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A future break-up email? Or perhaps, mind mail?</p><p>"We are all engineered beings<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. I'm sorry that your makeup shows that you have a high risk for heart attacks,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. so you are not for me. The lab made the miistake, its not your fault and don't blame god especially Pfizer or you'll vanish like the rest. But, my kids must be adequate for space careers, so I simply can not date you now, in grade 3. When I cease fertility, we can reconsider!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A future break-up email ?
Or perhaps , mind mail ?
" We are all engineered beings .. I 'm sorry that your makeup shows that you have a high risk for heart attacks , .. so you are not for me .
The lab made the miistake , its not your fault and do n't blame god especially Pfizer or you 'll vanish like the rest .
But , my kids must be adequate for space careers , so I simply can not date you now , in grade 3 .
When I cease fertility , we can reconsider !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A future break-up email?
Or perhaps, mind mail?
"We are all engineered beings .. I'm sorry that your makeup shows that you have a high risk for heart attacks, .. so you are not for me.
The lab made the miistake, its not your fault and don't blame god especially Pfizer or you'll vanish like the rest.
But, my kids must be adequate for space careers, so I simply can not date you now, in grade 3.
When I cease fertility, we can reconsider!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627003</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>xch13fx</author>
	<datestamp>1247084640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i see baseball players and other heavy steroid users being interested in this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i see baseball players and other heavy steroid users being interested in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i see baseball players and other heavy steroid users being interested in this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631127</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1247063820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or impregnate her female friend and get impregnated by her female friend. It has been a dream of mine for a while now that females could reproduce with other females.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or impregnate her female friend and get impregnated by her female friend .
It has been a dream of mine for a while now that females could reproduce with other females .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or impregnate her female friend and get impregnated by her female friend.
It has been a dream of mine for a while now that females could reproduce with other females.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626833</id>
	<title>Unix has been killing sperm for decades.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247083980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, something to restore the balance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , something to restore the balance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, something to restore the balance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634555</id>
	<title>Re:Moral issues?</title>
	<author>HellYeahAutomaton</author>
	<datestamp>1247143380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, well how about someone stops by your house and kills you and decides that punishment for murder doesn't matter because these "silly ideological" laws against murder shouldn't count against him? No. Unleashing a science experiment as a human should be thought through. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.</p><p>Your assumption that people with ethical concerns are luddites is faulty. More than likely they are more informed and (thankfully) wiser than you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , well how about someone stops by your house and kills you and decides that punishment for murder does n't matter because these " silly ideological " laws against murder should n't count against him ?
No. Unleashing a science experiment as a human should be thought through .
Just because you can do something , does n't mean you should.Your assumption that people with ethical concerns are luddites is faulty .
More than likely they are more informed and ( thankfully ) wiser than you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, well how about someone stops by your house and kills you and decides that punishment for murder doesn't matter because these "silly ideological" laws against murder shouldn't count against him?
No. Unleashing a science experiment as a human should be thought through.
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.Your assumption that people with ethical concerns are luddites is faulty.
More than likely they are more informed and (thankfully) wiser than you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626291</id>
	<title>Ok, let me be the first to say this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every sperm is sacred.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every sperm is sacred .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every sperm is sacred.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629171</id>
	<title>Jurrasic Park!</title>
	<author>Miamicoastguard</author>
	<datestamp>1247051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all we need is a spare island and some Stegosaurus DNA and we can finally eat Dinosaurs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need is a spare island and some Stegosaurus DNA and we can finally eat Dinosaurs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need is a spare island and some Stegosaurus DNA and we can finally eat Dinosaurs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</id>
	<title>Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1247082420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a woman gets your blood, then she can bear your children?  Wow!  This will be a great argument for deadbeat dads!  Now they can truthfully say "I never had sexual relations with that woman."</p><p>Black markets for the blood of rich men . . .<br>Personal IP rights in your personal blood composition . . .</p><p>Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a woman gets your blood , then she can bear your children ?
Wow ! This will be a great argument for deadbeat dads !
Now they can truthfully say " I never had sexual relations with that woman .
" Black markets for the blood of rich men .
. .Personal IP rights in your personal blood composition .
. .Wow , the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009 ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a woman gets your blood, then she can bear your children?
Wow!  This will be a great argument for deadbeat dads!
Now they can truthfully say "I never had sexual relations with that woman.
"Black markets for the blood of rich men .
. .Personal IP rights in your personal blood composition .
. .Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629951</id>
	<title>Screw moral issues......</title>
	<author>gintoki</author>
	<datestamp>1247056500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We have much more pressing concerns. I watched this on BBC just an hour ago. They stated that in the 1950s men had a sperm count of about 120 million per ml but now its about half at 60 million per ml. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one seeing where this is going. Men are becoming more and more useless as we become more and more technologically advanced (no surprises there). This means that in the future men will no longer be needed for the continuation of the human race. Why the hell would women want a something useless/outdated/outclassed? (this is pretty evident from the love they have for shopping). Now they can have kids without men. Screw sperm donors....they are gonna make their own sperm (Image of a DIY sperm in a  petri dish packaged like a children's chemistry set comes to mind). Call me crazy but from tomorrow onwards I'm gonna suck up to all my female friends and be extra nice to my girlfriend so that they will find me useful as far into the future as possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have much more pressing concerns .
I watched this on BBC just an hour ago .
They stated that in the 1950s men had a sperm count of about 120 million per ml but now its about half at 60 million per ml .
I 'm pretty sure I 'm not the only one seeing where this is going .
Men are becoming more and more useless as we become more and more technologically advanced ( no surprises there ) .
This means that in the future men will no longer be needed for the continuation of the human race .
Why the hell would women want a something useless/outdated/outclassed ?
( this is pretty evident from the love they have for shopping ) .
Now they can have kids without men .
Screw sperm donors....they are gon na make their own sperm ( Image of a DIY sperm in a petri dish packaged like a children 's chemistry set comes to mind ) .
Call me crazy but from tomorrow onwards I 'm gon na suck up to all my female friends and be extra nice to my girlfriend so that they will find me useful as far into the future as possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have much more pressing concerns.
I watched this on BBC just an hour ago.
They stated that in the 1950s men had a sperm count of about 120 million per ml but now its about half at 60 million per ml.
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one seeing where this is going.
Men are becoming more and more useless as we become more and more technologically advanced (no surprises there).
This means that in the future men will no longer be needed for the continuation of the human race.
Why the hell would women want a something useless/outdated/outclassed?
(this is pretty evident from the love they have for shopping).
Now they can have kids without men.
Screw sperm donors....they are gonna make their own sperm (Image of a DIY sperm in a  petri dish packaged like a children's chemistry set comes to mind).
Call me crazy but from tomorrow onwards I'm gonna suck up to all my female friends and be extra nice to my girlfriend so that they will find me useful as far into the future as possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635271</id>
	<title>Sarah Palin funded research?</title>
	<author>blast3r</author>
	<datestamp>1247148780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't doubt it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't doubt it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627569</id>
	<title>Re:Men No Longer Needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247043780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Less war? Women HATE each other. Even best friends will talk behind each others backs at the drop of a hat. <br> <br>

Russia whispering to China: I heard the US said your hair looked too brown<br>
China to Russia: Oh SNAP! WHERE'S THAT NUKE BUTTON?!<br> <br>

And women are much more emotional than men. I don't see a matriarchal society working very well... (yes, much generalization but this is much more likely than the opposite)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Less war ?
Women HATE each other .
Even best friends will talk behind each others backs at the drop of a hat .
Russia whispering to China : I heard the US said your hair looked too brown China to Russia : Oh SNAP !
WHERE 'S THAT NUKE BUTTON ? !
And women are much more emotional than men .
I do n't see a matriarchal society working very well... ( yes , much generalization but this is much more likely than the opposite )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Less war?
Women HATE each other.
Even best friends will talk behind each others backs at the drop of a hat.
Russia whispering to China: I heard the US said your hair looked too brown
China to Russia: Oh SNAP!
WHERE'S THAT NUKE BUTTON?!
And women are much more emotional than men.
I don't see a matriarchal society working very well... (yes, much generalization but this is much more likely than the opposite)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631041</id>
	<title>unethical?</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1247063100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess the only really unethical thing is that she didn't swallow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the only really unethical thing is that she did n't swallow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the only really unethical thing is that she didn't swallow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959</id>
	<title>I can't believe it's not butter!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For real, doesn't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it's NOT human?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For real , does n't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it 's NOT human ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For real, doesn't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it's NOT human?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247080980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's the big deal?  I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the big deal ?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I do n't even need a laboratory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the big deal?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626259</id>
	<title>NOT being used for reproduction.</title>
	<author>JO\_DIE\_THE\_STAR\_F***</author>
	<datestamp>1247082000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article <i>The IVD sperm will not and cannot be used for fertility treatment. As well as being prohibited by UK law, the research team say fertilization of human eggs and implantation of embryos would hold no scientific merit for them as they want to study the process as a model for research.</i> <p>
Talking about using this sperm for reproduction is a little <b>Premature</b>. </p><p> I am soooo funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article The IVD sperm will not and can not be used for fertility treatment .
As well as being prohibited by UK law , the research team say fertilization of human eggs and implantation of embryos would hold no scientific merit for them as they want to study the process as a model for research .
Talking about using this sperm for reproduction is a little Premature .
I am soooo funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article The IVD sperm will not and cannot be used for fertility treatment.
As well as being prohibited by UK law, the research team say fertilization of human eggs and implantation of embryos would hold no scientific merit for them as they want to study the process as a model for research.
Talking about using this sperm for reproduction is a little Premature.
I am soooo funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626667</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1247083320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My first thought on this was that this would be Valerie Solanas' <a href="http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html" title="sbc.edu">dream</a> [sbc.edu] come true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My first thought on this was that this would be Valerie Solanas ' dream [ sbc.edu ] come true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first thought on this was that this would be Valerie Solanas' dream [sbc.edu] come true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625969</id>
	<title>Where's the story?</title>
	<author>bugg</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the BBC story that's mentioned?  I think the editors left a link out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the BBC story that 's mentioned ?
I think the editors left a link out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the BBC story that's mentioned?
I think the editors left a link out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630289</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247058120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If, as you say, they did produce sperm from a female, won't it only have chromosome pair XX? And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX, it will only produce females and no males.<br>I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If , as you say , they did produce sperm from a female , wo n't it only have chromosome pair XX ?
And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX , it will only produce females and no males.I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If, as you say, they did produce sperm from a female, won't it only have chromosome pair XX?
And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX, it will only produce females and no males.I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</id>
	<title>Now how will Slashdotters get laid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If sperm could easily be reproduced, I'm SURE the average Slashdotter's sex life will plummet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If sperm could easily be reproduced , I 'm SURE the average Slashdotter 's sex life will plummet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If sperm could easily be reproduced, I'm SURE the average Slashdotter's sex life will plummet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628139</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>StormReaver</author>
	<datestamp>1247046540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Interestingly, this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple.</p></div><p>This kind of development would remove the one thing women can't do without men.  This might lead to a world where women hold all the cards and make all the decision about who gets sex, and when.  Oh, wait....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly , this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple.This kind of development would remove the one thing women ca n't do without men .
This might lead to a world where women hold all the cards and make all the decision about who gets sex , and when .
Oh , wait... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly, this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple.This kind of development would remove the one thing women can't do without men.
This might lead to a world where women hold all the cards and make all the decision about who gets sex, and when.
Oh, wait....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627281</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247085660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How? You need male stem cells to produce the artificial sperm, and a womb. But the door has been open for ages; lots of gays have fathered children. Some of them are in Congress bashing gays...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How ?
You need male stem cells to produce the artificial sperm , and a womb .
But the door has been open for ages ; lots of gays have fathered children .
Some of them are in Congress bashing gays.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How?
You need male stem cells to produce the artificial sperm, and a womb.
But the door has been open for ages; lots of gays have fathered children.
Some of them are in Congress bashing gays...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629673</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247054700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the Article:<p><div class="quote"><p>We demonstarted clearly
that germ cells dereived from XY hES cells are able to enter meiosis and complete
this process. In contrast, germ cells derived from XX hES cells express spermatogonia
specific markers, but are not able to complete meiotic process in vitro.  There are
several lines of evidence demonstrating that genes on Y chromosomes are essential
for meiosis.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Article : We demonstarted clearly that germ cells dereived from XY hES cells are able to enter meiosis and complete this process .
In contrast , germ cells derived from XX hES cells express spermatogonia specific markers , but are not able to complete meiotic process in vitro .
There are several lines of evidence demonstrating that genes on Y chromosomes are essential for meiosis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Article:We demonstarted clearly
that germ cells dereived from XY hES cells are able to enter meiosis and complete
this process.
In contrast, germ cells derived from XX hES cells express spermatogonia
specific markers, but are not able to complete meiotic process in vitro.
There are
several lines of evidence demonstrating that genes on Y chromosomes are essential
for meiosis.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630839</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247061660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There goes everyone. How long do you think it'll take until the first artificial human ovum...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes everyone .
How long do you think it 'll take until the first artificial human ovum... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes everyone.
How long do you think it'll take until the first artificial human ovum...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626585</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1247083020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until women find a better way to quickly get real estate and lifetime income for the small cost of a divorce lawyer they'll still want men around.</p><p>Hmm, I wonder what will happen when a woman divorces a woman. How would the judge figure out which one to give the house, car, and alimony to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until women find a better way to quickly get real estate and lifetime income for the small cost of a divorce lawyer they 'll still want men around.Hmm , I wonder what will happen when a woman divorces a woman .
How would the judge figure out which one to give the house , car , and alimony to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until women find a better way to quickly get real estate and lifetime income for the small cost of a divorce lawyer they'll still want men around.Hmm, I wonder what will happen when a woman divorces a woman.
How would the judge figure out which one to give the house, car, and alimony to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630215</id>
	<title>Re:So what? Lesbian Utopia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247057820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.</p>  </div><p>Guess Again. Its not that avialability of sperm has ever been a problem. Even the creating an egg wouldn't be that hard with modern knowlege. Now to make a man grow a uterus and maintain Safe levels of hormones for a fetus, that would be a feat!<br>Imagine Dynamic Hermaphrodism and Limb Regeneration! 4 player mutitap (geneticaly and Physcaly) New stages of arousal (after after after glow) We could give your third leg a third arm! Synesize novel gender complete with novel hormones. The possiblities are only limited by a thing call being a prude.<br>Current technolgy is so 1890's; Dig a hole, Graft a pole, make sure to leave a shim so the whole( a wound) doesnt heal. Eat some hormone pills.<br>I think you want to be god more than have a problem with the one anyone believes in.</p><p>The more likely senario is that women will now turn their work to killing of men slowly to build their lesbian utopia. I for one fear / Welcome our new overladies!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next , all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell .
Guess Again .
Its not that avialability of sperm has ever been a problem .
Even the creating an egg would n't be that hard with modern knowlege .
Now to make a man grow a uterus and maintain Safe levels of hormones for a fetus , that would be a feat ! Imagine Dynamic Hermaphrodism and Limb Regeneration !
4 player mutitap ( geneticaly and Physcaly ) New stages of arousal ( after after after glow ) We could give your third leg a third arm !
Synesize novel gender complete with novel hormones .
The possiblities are only limited by a thing call being a prude.Current technolgy is so 1890 's ; Dig a hole , Graft a pole , make sure to leave a shim so the whole ( a wound ) doesnt heal .
Eat some hormone pills.I think you want to be god more than have a problem with the one anyone believes in.The more likely senario is that women will now turn their work to killing of men slowly to build their lesbian utopia .
I for one fear / Welcome our new overladies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.
Guess Again.
Its not that avialability of sperm has ever been a problem.
Even the creating an egg wouldn't be that hard with modern knowlege.
Now to make a man grow a uterus and maintain Safe levels of hormones for a fetus, that would be a feat!Imagine Dynamic Hermaphrodism and Limb Regeneration!
4 player mutitap (geneticaly and Physcaly) New stages of arousal (after after after glow) We could give your third leg a third arm!
Synesize novel gender complete with novel hormones.
The possiblities are only limited by a thing call being a prude.Current technolgy is so 1890's; Dig a hole, Graft a pole, make sure to leave a shim so the whole( a wound) doesnt heal.
Eat some hormone pills.I think you want to be god more than have a problem with the one anyone believes in.The more likely senario is that women will now turn their work to killing of men slowly to build their lesbian utopia.
I for one fear / Welcome our new overladies!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630881</id>
	<title>Re:Moral issues?</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1247061900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The issue is responsibility for the result. Whoever creates someone using these techniques should be held responsible for the outcome.<br>Death through genetic disease or deformity would be grounds for negligence or manslaughter. I've no problems with human cloning or messing around with stem sells or artificial reproduction but those participating had better be aware of the risks and results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue is responsibility for the result .
Whoever creates someone using these techniques should be held responsible for the outcome.Death through genetic disease or deformity would be grounds for negligence or manslaughter .
I 've no problems with human cloning or messing around with stem sells or artificial reproduction but those participating had better be aware of the risks and results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue is responsibility for the result.
Whoever creates someone using these techniques should be held responsible for the outcome.Death through genetic disease or deformity would be grounds for negligence or manslaughter.
I've no problems with human cloning or messing around with stem sells or artificial reproduction but those participating had better be aware of the risks and results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630705</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247060640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Genetic rape?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Genetic rape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Genetic rape?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626081</id>
	<title>It's about time...</title>
	<author>Tenek</author>
	<datestamp>1247081400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, this will address the critical shortage of sperm we face today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , this will address the critical shortage of sperm we face today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, this will address the critical shortage of sperm we face today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633517</id>
	<title>Re:I SWEAR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247132640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What they did is destroy a living embryo, and make sperm from it. And some call this progress ???<br>Don't people remember that nature is the other way around, a male unites with a female, the sperm meets the egg and becomes an embryo, then a living being.</p><p>I'm all for science and progress, but let's not forget about nature. Adoption is a very natural approach to infertility,</p><p>The human race is under no threat of disappearing that could justify those research!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What they did is destroy a living embryo , and make sperm from it .
And some call this progress ? ?
? Do n't people remember that nature is the other way around , a male unites with a female , the sperm meets the egg and becomes an embryo , then a living being.I 'm all for science and progress , but let 's not forget about nature .
Adoption is a very natural approach to infertility,The human race is under no threat of disappearing that could justify those research !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they did is destroy a living embryo, and make sperm from it.
And some call this progress ??
?Don't people remember that nature is the other way around, a male unites with a female, the sperm meets the egg and becomes an embryo, then a living being.I'm all for science and progress, but let's not forget about nature.
Adoption is a very natural approach to infertility,The human race is under no threat of disappearing that could justify those research!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633689</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247134200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the big deal? I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratory</p></div><p>What's the big deal? I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a lavatory.<br> <br>There, fixed it for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the big deal ?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I do n't even need a laboratoryWhat 's the big deal ?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I do n't even need a lavatory .
There , fixed it for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the big deal?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratoryWhat's the big deal?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a lavatory.
There, fixed it for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626297</id>
	<title>I swear the last line said...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...of inferior levels of masturbation."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...of inferior levels of masturbation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...of inferior levels of masturbation.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627073</id>
	<title>One upped</title>
	<author>psychicninja</author>
	<datestamp>1247084880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, this kind of beats the story I was just about to submit:<blockquote><div><p>Human Sperm Produced In The Lavatory</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , this kind of beats the story I was just about to submit : Human Sperm Produced In The Lavatory</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, this kind of beats the story I was just about to submit:Human Sperm Produced In The Lavatory
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995</id>
	<title>Mandatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one, welcome our female overlords. I hope they find me useful and will not use me for food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one , welcome our female overlords .
I hope they find me useful and will not use me for food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one, welcome our female overlords.
I hope they find me useful and will not use me for food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629087</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>anjin-san 3</author>
	<datestamp>1247051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What an immaculate idea!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What an immaculate idea !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an immaculate idea!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628895</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>cs668</author>
	<datestamp>1247050260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was predicted in a book I read in the 70's  I think the title was "Alph" gotta love Science Fiction becoming reality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was predicted in a book I read in the 70 's I think the title was " Alph " got ta love Science Fiction becoming reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was predicted in a book I read in the 70's  I think the title was "Alph" gotta love Science Fiction becoming reality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630317</id>
	<title>Inferior levels of what?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247058240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>... and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation.</i></p><p>Raise your hand if read "maturation" as something else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation.Raise your hand if read " maturation " as something else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation.Raise your hand if read "maturation" as something else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626033</id>
	<title>That's not news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Human sperm has been produced in laboratories ever since they got Internet connection and you could download porn to your lab PC.</p><p>Oh, they mean artificial sperm. Nevermind then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Human sperm has been produced in laboratories ever since they got Internet connection and you could download porn to your lab PC.Oh , they mean artificial sperm .
Nevermind then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Human sperm has been produced in laboratories ever since they got Internet connection and you could download porn to your lab PC.Oh, they mean artificial sperm.
Nevermind then</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627183</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247085300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The scientists <i>think</i> the product is perfect, but what if it's not?  At this stage of our understanding in the process, you can't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus.  We have no idea how it would go.</p></div><p>Why could this same argument not have been used against the first human experiments with in vitro fertilization?  (Which the media liked to call "test tube babies" at the time.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The scientists think the product is perfect , but what if it 's not ?
At this stage of our understanding in the process , you ca n't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus .
We have no idea how it would go.Why could this same argument not have been used against the first human experiments with in vitro fertilization ?
( Which the media liked to call " test tube babies " at the time .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The scientists think the product is perfect, but what if it's not?
At this stage of our understanding in the process, you can't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus.
We have no idea how it would go.Why could this same argument not have been used against the first human experiments with in vitro fertilization?
(Which the media liked to call "test tube babies" at the time.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639883</id>
	<title>HaHA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247167440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotters will never get laid now.</p><p>(No big loss I suppose, it's not like they were gettin' any anyway)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotters will never get laid now .
( No big loss I suppose , it 's not like they were gettin ' any anyway )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotters will never get laid now.
(No big loss I suppose, it's not like they were gettin' any anyway)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632735</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Meumeu</author>
	<datestamp>1247078520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or, 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner.</p></div><p>Actually <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909164,00.html?iid=tsmodule" title="time.com" rel="nofollow">no</a> [time.com]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage. That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian , they could generate some sperm for her , thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner.Actually no [ time.com ] : It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos ; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo , they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage .
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome , which female cells do not contain , may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner.Actually no [time.com]:It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage.
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628071</id>
	<title>Why is it...</title>
	<author>MadCat221</author>
	<datestamp>1247046240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that they're always trying to synthesize (or obviate) human sperm and not eggs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that they 're always trying to synthesize ( or obviate ) human sperm and not eggs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that they're always trying to synthesize (or obviate) human sperm and not eggs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626419</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1247082540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What's unethical about this?</i></p><p>Not saying I believe any of these to be valid, but these are the concerns people are likely to have:</p><p>1. "Playing god."</p><p>There is a major taboo with messing with our reproductive systems, and every time any major advance in reproductive science occurs, there are religious arguments against it.  Compare it with IVF and birth control, both of which attracted a lot of attention from a number of religions and are considered unethical by many.</p><p>2. The technique enables a major change in the reproduction of our species.  There does not appear to be any reason why the stem cells would have to come from male donor; this tecnique could result in a child with two female biological parents.  Potentially even only one female biological parent.  I can understand why this would worry a lot of people.</p><p>3. A child resulting from the use of this technique is quite likely to have a biological parent who never actually lived.  This is a rather peculiar potential outcome, and may well worry some people.</p><p>I don't personally see any of these as a serious problem, as long as the technique is used sparingly.  But you can bet there are a lot of people who find some or all of these ideas repugnant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's unethical about this ? Not saying I believe any of these to be valid , but these are the concerns people are likely to have : 1 .
" Playing god .
" There is a major taboo with messing with our reproductive systems , and every time any major advance in reproductive science occurs , there are religious arguments against it .
Compare it with IVF and birth control , both of which attracted a lot of attention from a number of religions and are considered unethical by many.2 .
The technique enables a major change in the reproduction of our species .
There does not appear to be any reason why the stem cells would have to come from male donor ; this tecnique could result in a child with two female biological parents .
Potentially even only one female biological parent .
I can understand why this would worry a lot of people.3 .
A child resulting from the use of this technique is quite likely to have a biological parent who never actually lived .
This is a rather peculiar potential outcome , and may well worry some people.I do n't personally see any of these as a serious problem , as long as the technique is used sparingly .
But you can bet there are a lot of people who find some or all of these ideas repugnant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's unethical about this?Not saying I believe any of these to be valid, but these are the concerns people are likely to have:1.
"Playing god.
"There is a major taboo with messing with our reproductive systems, and every time any major advance in reproductive science occurs, there are religious arguments against it.
Compare it with IVF and birth control, both of which attracted a lot of attention from a number of religions and are considered unethical by many.2.
The technique enables a major change in the reproduction of our species.
There does not appear to be any reason why the stem cells would have to come from male donor; this tecnique could result in a child with two female biological parents.
Potentially even only one female biological parent.
I can understand why this would worry a lot of people.3.
A child resulting from the use of this technique is quite likely to have a biological parent who never actually lived.
This is a rather peculiar potential outcome, and may well worry some people.I don't personally see any of these as a serious problem, as long as the technique is used sparingly.
But you can bet there are a lot of people who find some or all of these ideas repugnant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>Speare</author>
	<datestamp>1247082480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"What's unethical about this?"</p><p>A fair question, but the answer is obvious.  The scientists <i>think</i> the product is perfect, but what if it's not?  At this stage of our understanding in the process, you can't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus.  We have no idea how it would go.  Even if it were to survive the gestation, we may only discover after a year or two that the child has some debilitating problem:  now we've created a human being from scratch who must die prematurely, and the parents and caregivers would also be heavily affected in the negative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What 's unethical about this ?
" A fair question , but the answer is obvious .
The scientists think the product is perfect , but what if it 's not ?
At this stage of our understanding in the process , you ca n't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus .
We have no idea how it would go .
Even if it were to survive the gestation , we may only discover after a year or two that the child has some debilitating problem : now we 've created a human being from scratch who must die prematurely , and the parents and caregivers would also be heavily affected in the negative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What's unethical about this?
"A fair question, but the answer is obvious.
The scientists think the product is perfect, but what if it's not?
At this stage of our understanding in the process, you can't ethically ask some woman to bear a potentially deformed or unviable fetus.
We have no idea how it would go.
Even if it were to survive the gestation, we may only discover after a year or two that the child has some debilitating problem:  now we've created a human being from scratch who must die prematurely, and the parents and caregivers would also be heavily affected in the negative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627049</id>
	<title>Bad news for JAV actors</title>
	<author>McGregorMortis</author>
	<datestamp>1247084760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will revolutionize the Japanese Adult Video industry!  They won't need to hire 50 guys to make a bukkake video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will revolutionize the Japanese Adult Video industry !
They wo n't need to hire 50 guys to make a bukkake video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will revolutionize the Japanese Adult Video industry!
They won't need to hire 50 guys to make a bukkake video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627377</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>D-Cypell</author>
	<datestamp>1247086080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner #1<br>2. Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner #2<br>3. ???<br>4. Profit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner # 12 .
Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner # 23 .
? ? ? 4. Profit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner #12.
Genetically engineer sperm from gay partner #23.
???4. Profit</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631323</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247065500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.</p></div><p>Would be quite interesting to see what someone with two Y-chromosomes would be like.<br>Would he be like Bruno or like Chuck Norris.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next , all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.Would be quite interesting to see what someone with two Y-chromosomes would be like.Would he be like Bruno or like Chuck Norris .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.Would be quite interesting to see what someone with two Y-chromosomes would be like.Would he be like Bruno or like Chuck Norris.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1247086500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner. Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell. Then, once same-sex couples can successfully reproduce, the religious right is going to go apeshit and all hell is going to break loose!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian , they could generate some sperm for her , thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner .
Next , all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell .
Then , once same-sex couples can successfully reproduce , the religious right is going to go apeshit and all hell is going to break loose !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, 3. if they took stem cells from a lesbian, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby along her to impregnate her other female partner.
Next, all they need to do is to generate an egg cell from a homosexual male stem cell.
Then, once same-sex couples can successfully reproduce, the religious right is going to go apeshit and all hell is going to break loose!
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627387</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247086080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>still big big can of worm.</p></div><p>No, "worm" no longer needed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>still big big can of worm.No , " worm " no longer needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>still big big can of worm.No, "worm" no longer needed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631709</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247068260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a clone at all.  Instead you'd get the most inbred offspring imaginable.  You as a person already have a pretty diverse genetic makeup - your DNA is made up of pairs of chromosomes.  When you reproduce those pairs split to form some sequence (which side of the pair gets split off is essentially random).</p><p>So for example you might have the following<br>AB<br>CD<br>EF<br>GH</p><p>If the sperm created from you picks up the following:</p><p>A<br>D<br>F<br>G</p><p>And the egg picks up:</p><p>A<br>D<br>E<br>H</p><p>Then the resulting person's genetic code would be:</p><p>AA<br>DD<br>FE<br>GH</p><p>That's different than the code of the original person.  That property is pretty obvious when you think about it: 2 parents produce genetically different offspring every time they have different children right (aside from identical twins)?</p><p>The problem is that for any negative recessive traits they'll only manifest themselves if it joins back with itself.  Such as the AA and DD pairs above.  With a stranger that's rather rare - they'd need to be carrying the same recessive gene AND you'd both need to give that gene when you reproduce.   With sibling pairings, or offspring to parent pairings though, you share 50\% of the same genetic code, so the chances of you both having negative recessive genes goes up dramatically, which is why inbred children are at such a high risk of birth defects.  Now, with a 50\% match being that bad, you can imagine that a person breeding with themselves (so a 100\% match between both "parents") would produce children at an even higher risk of birth defects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a clone at all .
Instead you 'd get the most inbred offspring imaginable .
You as a person already have a pretty diverse genetic makeup - your DNA is made up of pairs of chromosomes .
When you reproduce those pairs split to form some sequence ( which side of the pair gets split off is essentially random ) .So for example you might have the followingABCDEFGHIf the sperm created from you picks up the following : ADFGAnd the egg picks up : ADEHThen the resulting person 's genetic code would be : AADDFEGHThat 's different than the code of the original person .
That property is pretty obvious when you think about it : 2 parents produce genetically different offspring every time they have different children right ( aside from identical twins ) ? The problem is that for any negative recessive traits they 'll only manifest themselves if it joins back with itself .
Such as the AA and DD pairs above .
With a stranger that 's rather rare - they 'd need to be carrying the same recessive gene AND you 'd both need to give that gene when you reproduce .
With sibling pairings , or offspring to parent pairings though , you share 50 \ % of the same genetic code , so the chances of you both having negative recessive genes goes up dramatically , which is why inbred children are at such a high risk of birth defects .
Now , with a 50 \ % match being that bad , you can imagine that a person breeding with themselves ( so a 100 \ % match between both " parents " ) would produce children at an even higher risk of birth defects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a clone at all.
Instead you'd get the most inbred offspring imaginable.
You as a person already have a pretty diverse genetic makeup - your DNA is made up of pairs of chromosomes.
When you reproduce those pairs split to form some sequence (which side of the pair gets split off is essentially random).So for example you might have the followingABCDEFGHIf the sperm created from you picks up the following:ADFGAnd the egg picks up:ADEHThen the resulting person's genetic code would be:AADDFEGHThat's different than the code of the original person.
That property is pretty obvious when you think about it: 2 parents produce genetically different offspring every time they have different children right (aside from identical twins)?The problem is that for any negative recessive traits they'll only manifest themselves if it joins back with itself.
Such as the AA and DD pairs above.
With a stranger that's rather rare - they'd need to be carrying the same recessive gene AND you'd both need to give that gene when you reproduce.
With sibling pairings, or offspring to parent pairings though, you share 50\% of the same genetic code, so the chances of you both having negative recessive genes goes up dramatically, which is why inbred children are at such a high risk of birth defects.
Now, with a 50\% match being that bad, you can imagine that a person breeding with themselves (so a 100\% match between both "parents") would produce children at an even higher risk of birth defects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626241</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1247081940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as women don't find out about jar openers I think we're safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as women do n't find out about jar openers I think we 're safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as women don't find out about jar openers I think we're safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628523</id>
	<title>And sterm cells from blood...</title>
	<author>johanwanderer</author>
	<datestamp>1247048400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to this article <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/stories/2009/07/06/daily39.html" title="bizjournals.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [bizjournals.com], iPS cells can now be created from blood, does that mean that men are now obsolete?</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to this article here [ bizjournals.com ] , iPS cells can now be created from blood , does that mean that men are now obsolete ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to this article here [bizjournals.com], iPS cells can now be created from blood, does that mean that men are now obsolete?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626197</id>
	<title>Re:I can't believe it's not butter!</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1247081760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>doesn't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it's NOT human?</i></p><p>No.  Not unless you want to start claiming that all the people born because of IVF aren't human, which strikes me as a rather bizarre proposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it 's NOT human ? No .
Not unless you want to start claiming that all the people born because of IVF are n't human , which strikes me as a rather bizarre proposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't the fact that it was made in a lab mean it's NOT human?No.
Not unless you want to start claiming that all the people born because of IVF aren't human, which strikes me as a rather bizarre proposition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625961</id>
	<title>Wow science is amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once we can produce eggs in the lab, we are one step closer to a "Matrix" type reality for the future of humanity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once we can produce eggs in the lab , we are one step closer to a " Matrix " type reality for the future of humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once we can produce eggs in the lab, we are one step closer to a "Matrix" type reality for the future of humanity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626687</id>
	<title>Re:This also from science today:</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1247083440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh I can already do that. Just send me a few bars of gold, I'll transform them into lead and send them back to you. Postage is on you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh I can already do that .
Just send me a few bars of gold , I 'll transform them into lead and send them back to you .
Postage is on you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh I can already do that.
Just send me a few bars of gold, I'll transform them into lead and send them back to you.
Postage is on you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631683</id>
	<title>I did!</title>
	<author>hotfireball</author>
	<datestamp>1247068080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I producing it as well, mostly every day. And not only in laboratory, but also sometimes in a kitchen, sometimes on a table in a regular room, sometimes in a bath. But usually on a bed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I producing it as well , mostly every day .
And not only in laboratory , but also sometimes in a kitchen , sometimes on a table in a regular room , sometimes in a bath .
But usually on a bed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I producing it as well, mostly every day.
And not only in laboratory, but also sometimes in a kitchen, sometimes on a table in a regular room, sometimes in a bath.
But usually on a bed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626365</id>
	<title>simpsons didn't do this!!!</title>
	<author>anonymousNR</author>
	<datestamp>1247082300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah now we beat simpsons after all these years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah now we beat simpsons after all these years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah now we beat simpsons after all these years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628131</id>
	<title>Re:Men No Longer Needed</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1247046540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Possible consequences: less war;</i>
</p><p>Lot more assassinations though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Possible consequences : less war ; Lot more assassinations though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Possible consequences: less war;
Lot more assassinations though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628801</id>
	<title>Spending research funds to synthesize WHAT?!</title>
	<author>BaronHethorSamedi</author>
	<datestamp>1247049900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, <em>really</em>.  Was there a shortage?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , really .
Was there a shortage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, really.
Was there a shortage?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</id>
	<title>One implication</title>
	<author>Arthur B.</author>
	<datestamp>1247083500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interestingly, this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple. Sure it's been foreseen for a long time, still big big can of worm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly , this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple .
Sure it 's been foreseen for a long time , still big big can of worm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly, this opens the door to biological children from homosexuals couple.
Sure it's been foreseen for a long time, still big big can of worm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631119</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247063760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really bad idea.  It would result in some pretty bad incest/inbreeding problems.  You'd be much better off cloning her.  She would at least have a healthy genome then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really bad idea .
It would result in some pretty bad incest/inbreeding problems .
You 'd be much better off cloning her .
She would at least have a healthy genome then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really bad idea.
It would result in some pretty bad incest/inbreeding problems.
You'd be much better off cloning her.
She would at least have a healthy genome then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657451</id>
	<title>Re:RTFM</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1247243040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage. That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.</p></div><p>That's not surprising, seeing that a female never produces sperm in the first place.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos ; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo , they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage .
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome , which female cells do not contain , may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.That 's not surprising , seeing that a female never produces sperm in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It is worth noting that researchers could generate IVD sperm only from male embryos; when they tried using stem cells from a female embryo, they were unable to get sperm to mature past the spermatogonial stage.
That suggests that genes located on the Y chromosome, which female cells do not contain, may be essential for triggering the maturation of the primitive sperm cell.That's not surprising, seeing that a female never produces sperm in the first place.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627705</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>RazorSharp</author>
	<datestamp>1247044620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one of the reasons human cloning is illegal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) It would be worse than that, however. Think about professional sports and all the potential corruption there. The records would become as meaningless as the MLB's over the last twenty years.</p><p>Personally, I think this research is good because it will probably be used to clone organs rather than entire individuals. I can't wait until I don't have to feel guilty for smoking<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one of the reasons human cloning is illegal ; ) It would be worse than that , however .
Think about professional sports and all the potential corruption there .
The records would become as meaningless as the MLB 's over the last twenty years.Personally , I think this research is good because it will probably be used to clone organs rather than entire individuals .
I ca n't wait until I do n't have to feel guilty for smoking : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one of the reasons human cloning is illegal ;) It would be worse than that, however.
Think about professional sports and all the potential corruption there.
The records would become as meaningless as the MLB's over the last twenty years.Personally, I think this research is good because it will probably be used to clone organs rather than entire individuals.
I can't wait until I don't have to feel guilty for smoking :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634211</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>cffrost</author>
	<datestamp>1247139360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"big can of worm"</p></div><p>Probable typo, GP likely meant "big can of sperm."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" big can of worm " Probable typo , GP likely meant " big can of sperm .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"big can of worm"Probable typo, GP likely meant "big can of sperm.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628541</id>
	<title>Re:Now how will Slashdotters get laid?</title>
	<author>SoulRider</author>
	<datestamp>1247048400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obvoiusly you have never seen bukkake, sperm is already pretty easily produced.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obvoiusly you have never seen bukkake , sperm is already pretty easily produced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obvoiusly you have never seen bukkake, sperm is already pretty easily produced.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626303</id>
	<title>finally</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247082180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the human female can get rid of the strutting, violent, undependable worthless parasite known as the human male and replace him with a dildo and some stem cells</p><p>oh wait, shit, i'm a male</p><p>feminist science made me extinct!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the human female can get rid of the strutting , violent , undependable worthless parasite known as the human male and replace him with a dildo and some stem cellsoh wait , shit , i 'm a malefeminist science made me extinct !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the human female can get rid of the strutting, violent, undependable worthless parasite known as the human male and replace him with a dildo and some stem cellsoh wait, shit, i'm a malefeminist science made me extinct!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628311</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Gravedigger3</author>
	<datestamp>1247047380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He'll take a house, car, and alimony from a third party (male) because god forbid a woman comes out of a divorce proceeding without being set for life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 'll take a house , car , and alimony from a third party ( male ) because god forbid a woman comes out of a divorce proceeding without being set for life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He'll take a house, car, and alimony from a third party (male) because god forbid a woman comes out of a divorce proceeding without being set for life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</id>
	<title>I SWEAR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247080860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>I DIDNT DO IT!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>I DIDNT DO IT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I DIDNT DO IT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634067</id>
	<title>Re:I SWEAR</title>
	<author>cffrost</author>
	<datestamp>1247137980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] I bet it's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you.</p></div><p> <a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=The\_Andrea\_Doria" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">Elaine likes it.</a> [wikimedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] I bet it 's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you .
Elaine likes it .
[ wikimedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] I bet it's really embarrassing if someone tries to kill you.
Elaine likes it.
[wikimedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626293</id>
	<title>This bodes ill...</title>
	<author>billius</author>
	<datestamp>1247082180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=952#comic" title="smbc-comics.com" rel="nofollow">This bodes ill for us men....</a> [smbc-comics.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>This bodes ill for us men.... [ smbc-comics.com ] : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This bodes ill for us men.... [smbc-comics.com] :p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629555</id>
	<title>who's your daddy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247053980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it has to be said....</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; who's your daddy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it has to be said... .       who 's your daddy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it has to be said....
      who's your daddy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631407</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>soundguy</author>
	<datestamp>1247066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If, as you say, they did produce sperm from a female, won't it only have chromosome pair XX? And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX, it will only produce females and no males.<br>I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here.</p></div><p>Don't you mean GENDER diversity?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If , as you say , they did produce sperm from a female , wo n't it only have chromosome pair XX ?
And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX , it will only produce females and no males.I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here.Do n't you mean GENDER diversity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If, as you say, they did produce sperm from a female, won't it only have chromosome pair XX?
And if this is used to impregnate another female with chromosome pair XX, it will only produce females and no males.I think there might also be a chance of losing genetic diversity here.Don't you mean GENDER diversity?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634409</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247141760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and a very bad idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and a very bad idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and a very bad idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627011</id>
	<title>Re:Now how will Slashdotters get laid?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247084640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/~sm62704/journal/158180" title="slashdot.org">no problem...</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no problem... [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no problem... [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631135</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>lordharsha</author>
	<datestamp>1247063880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... would that be considered incest?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... would that be considered incest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... would that be considered incest?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639793</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1247167080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In all fairness inbreeding increases the likelihood of recessive traits developing whether those traits are positive or negative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all fairness inbreeding increases the likelihood of recessive traits developing whether those traits are positive or negative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all fairness inbreeding increases the likelihood of recessive traits developing whether those traits are positive or negative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635011</id>
	<title>Re:Mandatory...</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1247147400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good, good. -pats you on the head- For your compliance, your death shall be quick and painless.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good , good .
-pats you on the head- For your compliance , your death shall be quick and painless .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good, good.
-pats you on the head- For your compliance, your death shall be quick and painless.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627115</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1247085060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And you almost generated humor there. If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.</p></div><p>And maybe some blackjack and hookers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you almost generated humor there .
If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.And maybe some blackjack and hookers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you almost generated humor there.
If you had a lab maybe you could have actually been funny.And maybe some blackjack and hookers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630337</id>
	<title>Re:Men No Longer Needed</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1247058300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Possible consequences: less war;</i></p><p>Yes, because as we all know, women hating anyone, or being violent, absolutely <i>never</i> happens.  You might want to go and look up some statistics concerning domestic violence among lesbians; I suspect you may be surprised.</p><p>In my own observation, women have just as much capacity for spite, hatred, and general vindictiveness as we do; they're just less direct in how they go about expressing it.</p><p>Here's some more proof; if women as a gender are any more inclined towards positive treatment of other life forms in general than we are, then movement towards an exclusively female society will not happen.  I'm very familiar with the misandronistic line that it's simply payback for however many millenia of male dominance; but if they were really any better, they wouldn't simply be clamouring for the shoe to be on the other foot.</p><p>They'd be looking for a way in which we could both actually co-exist in a positive way, without <b>either</b> gender being held down by the other.</p><p>Women who aren't mentally ill (and I'm hoping that at least a few of them read Slashdot, and will back me up on this) understand something which their mentally stable male counterparts also do; namely that man and woman are both equal halves of the species, and both halves ideally depend on each other in order to survive.  Chauvanism is wrong, whether it is practiced by male or female; when woman suffers, man really suffers with her, and vice versa.</p><p>That is something which mechanistic, atheistic science cannot change; and we as an entire species will simply be destroyed by it if any of us try.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Possible consequences : less war ; Yes , because as we all know , women hating anyone , or being violent , absolutely never happens .
You might want to go and look up some statistics concerning domestic violence among lesbians ; I suspect you may be surprised.In my own observation , women have just as much capacity for spite , hatred , and general vindictiveness as we do ; they 're just less direct in how they go about expressing it.Here 's some more proof ; if women as a gender are any more inclined towards positive treatment of other life forms in general than we are , then movement towards an exclusively female society will not happen .
I 'm very familiar with the misandronistic line that it 's simply payback for however many millenia of male dominance ; but if they were really any better , they would n't simply be clamouring for the shoe to be on the other foot.They 'd be looking for a way in which we could both actually co-exist in a positive way , without either gender being held down by the other.Women who are n't mentally ill ( and I 'm hoping that at least a few of them read Slashdot , and will back me up on this ) understand something which their mentally stable male counterparts also do ; namely that man and woman are both equal halves of the species , and both halves ideally depend on each other in order to survive .
Chauvanism is wrong , whether it is practiced by male or female ; when woman suffers , man really suffers with her , and vice versa.That is something which mechanistic , atheistic science can not change ; and we as an entire species will simply be destroyed by it if any of us try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possible consequences: less war;Yes, because as we all know, women hating anyone, or being violent, absolutely never happens.
You might want to go and look up some statistics concerning domestic violence among lesbians; I suspect you may be surprised.In my own observation, women have just as much capacity for spite, hatred, and general vindictiveness as we do; they're just less direct in how they go about expressing it.Here's some more proof; if women as a gender are any more inclined towards positive treatment of other life forms in general than we are, then movement towards an exclusively female society will not happen.
I'm very familiar with the misandronistic line that it's simply payback for however many millenia of male dominance; but if they were really any better, they wouldn't simply be clamouring for the shoe to be on the other foot.They'd be looking for a way in which we could both actually co-exist in a positive way, without either gender being held down by the other.Women who aren't mentally ill (and I'm hoping that at least a few of them read Slashdot, and will back me up on this) understand something which their mentally stable male counterparts also do; namely that man and woman are both equal halves of the species, and both halves ideally depend on each other in order to survive.
Chauvanism is wrong, whether it is practiced by male or female; when woman suffers, man really suffers with her, and vice versa.That is something which mechanistic, atheistic science cannot change; and we as an entire species will simply be destroyed by it if any of us try.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629589</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247054160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What's the big deal? I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratory.</p></div></blockquote><p>

So, corporations can now manufacture babies in a factory to be used for slave labor, war etc. They still need artificial eggs.
Oh, and wealthy women can buy sperm instead of marrying some loser.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the big deal ?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I do n't even need a laboratory .
So , corporations can now manufacture babies in a factory to be used for slave labor , war etc .
They still need artificial eggs .
Oh , and wealthy women can buy sperm instead of marrying some loser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the big deal?
I generate human sperm at least once a day and I don't even need a laboratory.
So, corporations can now manufacture babies in a factory to be used for slave labor, war etc.
They still need artificial eggs.
Oh, and wealthy women can buy sperm instead of marrying some loser.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626323</id>
	<title>The Children</title>
	<author>supe</author>
	<datestamp>1247082240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These sperm will produce will never leave your basement or get off your lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These sperm will produce will never leave your basement or get off your lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These sperm will produce will never leave your basement or get off your lawn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638275</id>
	<title>Re:Moral issues?</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1247161260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progress</p></div><p>Or have a different set of beliefs than you.  Good to know that YOUR belief system and ethical standards are the end-all, be-all however.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progressOr have a different set of beliefs than you .
Good to know that YOUR belief system and ethical standards are the end-all , be-all however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People worried about ethical concerns over things like this are just luddities afraid of human biological progressOr have a different set of beliefs than you.
Good to know that YOUR belief system and ethical standards are the end-all, be-all however.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627193</id>
	<title>Ah man...</title>
	<author>fataugie</author>
	<datestamp>1247085360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There goes my second job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes my second job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes my second job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632165</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>sydbarrett74</author>
	<datestamp>1247071920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And, on a chilling (for me) twist, if they took stem cells from a woman, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby allowing her to impregnate herself.</p></div><p>Nature's already got <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenogenesis" title="wikipedia.org">parthenogenesis</a> [wikipedia.org], which has more-or-less the same outcome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And , on a chilling ( for me ) twist , if they took stem cells from a woman , they could generate some sperm for her , thereby allowing her to impregnate herself.Nature 's already got parthenogenesis [ wikipedia.org ] , which has more-or-less the same outcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, on a chilling (for me) twist, if they took stem cells from a woman, they could generate some sperm for her, thereby allowing her to impregnate herself.Nature's already got parthenogenesis [wikipedia.org], which has more-or-less the same outcome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627733</id>
	<title>Is this thread closed for moderation?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247044680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this thread closed for moderation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this thread closed for moderation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this thread closed for moderation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630091</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1247057340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The resultant offspring will be a clone of herself then? Legalized human cloning... mmm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The resultant offspring will be a clone of herself then ?
Legalized human cloning... mmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The resultant offspring will be a clone of herself then?
Legalized human cloning... mmm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629891</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247056020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you use the sperm from the lesbian to impregnate the same lesbian, and then some alien hell being bursts through her chest, at least that's what some church guy told me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you use the sperm from the lesbian to impregnate the same lesbian , and then some alien hell being bursts through her chest , at least that 's what some church guy told me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you use the sperm from the lesbian to impregnate the same lesbian, and then some alien hell being bursts through her chest, at least that's what some church guy told me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626083</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>DeadChobi</author>
	<datestamp>1247081400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good luck getting anything built, assembled, or shipped without us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck getting anything built , assembled , or shipped without us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck getting anything built, assembled, or shipped without us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631527</id>
	<title>News at 11</title>
	<author>Twide</author>
	<datestamp>1247067060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just in..Religious nuts against second cumming</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in..Religious nuts against second cumming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in..Religious nuts against second cumming</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632663</id>
	<title>What Would Me Do?</title>
	<author>denmarkw00t</author>
	<datestamp>1247077860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone has been talking about man's role being deminished, and that, potentially, women would rule the earth or at least greatly outnumber us - but has anyone stopped to think about the lucrative genetic prostitute racket!??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone has been talking about man 's role being deminished , and that , potentially , women would rule the earth or at least greatly outnumber us - but has anyone stopped to think about the lucrative genetic prostitute racket ! ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone has been talking about man's role being deminished, and that, potentially, women would rule the earth or at least greatly outnumber us - but has anyone stopped to think about the lucrative genetic prostitute racket!?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626183</id>
	<title>Thats Just Great...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1247081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I am even more redundant...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I am even more redundant.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I am even more redundant...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626309</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WAIT.... If they can make human sperm from stem cells, does this mean I can just go and get someone else to make my sperm for me?</p><p>If so, can I use Bing to find the best price for a vasectomy? No tiny screaming poop machines for me! I have better things to do with my time...like inane slashdot comments.</p><p>Besides...<br>Frankly, I'm kind of offended that my body is producing cells which I do not intend to use with out my expressed consent. This testicular dissent must not be allowed to continue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WAIT.... If they can make human sperm from stem cells , does this mean I can just go and get someone else to make my sperm for me ? If so , can I use Bing to find the best price for a vasectomy ?
No tiny screaming poop machines for me !
I have better things to do with my time...like inane slashdot comments.Besides...Frankly , I 'm kind of offended that my body is producing cells which I do not intend to use with out my expressed consent .
This testicular dissent must not be allowed to continue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WAIT.... If they can make human sperm from stem cells, does this mean I can just go and get someone else to make my sperm for me?If so, can I use Bing to find the best price for a vasectomy?
No tiny screaming poop machines for me!
I have better things to do with my time...like inane slashdot comments.Besides...Frankly, I'm kind of offended that my body is producing cells which I do not intend to use with out my expressed consent.
This testicular dissent must not be allowed to continue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28637019</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247155800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well that certainly gives new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself!'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that certainly gives new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself !
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that certainly gives new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself!
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626205</id>
	<title>And the offspring's first words...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>brrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiinnsssss!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>brrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiinnsssss !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiinnsssss!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629179</id>
	<title>Re:Blood==Stem Cells==Babies?????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!!</p></div><p>Fucking American.<br>It's not August yet.<br>Lrn2Calendar, plz.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009 ! ! !
! Fucking American.It 's not August yet.Lrn2Calendar , plz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, the world got more interesting on 7/08/2009!!!
!Fucking American.It's not August yet.Lrn2Calendar, plz.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113</id>
	<title>Er....</title>
	<author>Mikkeles</author>
	<datestamp>1247081520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's unethical about this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's unethical about this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's unethical about this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626285</id>
	<title>Re:I SWEAR</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1247082120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm still trying to figure out how they knew I call my bathroom "the Lab"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still trying to figure out how they knew I call my bathroom " the Lab "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still trying to figure out how they knew I call my bathroom "the Lab"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626193</id>
	<title>Re:Sperm Shortage?</title>
	<author>8127972</author>
	<datestamp>1247081760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's one reason. According to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7252165.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">this article</a> [bbc.co.uk], 85\% of sperm is damaged which leads to all sorts of "bad" things. So IMHO, something like this can perhaps help to fix damaged sperm or better understand why it is damaged.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's one reason .
According to this article [ bbc.co.uk ] , 85 \ % of sperm is damaged which leads to all sorts of " bad " things .
So IMHO , something like this can perhaps help to fix damaged sperm or better understand why it is damaged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's one reason.
According to this article [bbc.co.uk], 85\% of sperm is damaged which leads to all sorts of "bad" things.
So IMHO, something like this can perhaps help to fix damaged sperm or better understand why it is damaged.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629729</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247055000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626229</id>
	<title>What's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1247081880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>"the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation"</i>
</p><p>So... they're suitable for producing politicians, lawyers, and bad Slashdot comments?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation " So... they 're suitable for producing politicians , lawyers , and bad Slashdot comments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "the procedure is ethically questionable and that the gametes produced are of inferior levels of maturation"
So... they're suitable for producing politicians, lawyers, and bad Slashdot comments?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627099</id>
	<title>There goes the Snoo Snoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247084940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>:-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625981</id>
	<title>so what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will be producing some in a bedroom later w/o all the expensive equipment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will be producing some in a bedroom later w/o all the expensive equipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will be producing some in a bedroom later w/o all the expensive equipment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631387</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247066040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On both moral and evolutionary terms, homosexuality is very obviously wrong. It has nothing to do with religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On both moral and evolutionary terms , homosexuality is very obviously wrong .
It has nothing to do with religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On both moral and evolutionary terms, homosexuality is very obviously wrong.
It has nothing to do with religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626891</id>
	<title>Re:Er....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247084220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course regular parents take this chance every time the conceive a child.</p><p>I'm not sure I see the ethical dilemma in using this technology to allow a couple with fertility problems to reproduce.  Sure, in this case you don't know what the odds are, and its possible something will go wrong that couldn't go wrong normally.  But everyone who has a child takes the chance that the child might be deformed or sick or die shortly after birth.  Its part of the human condition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course regular parents take this chance every time the conceive a child.I 'm not sure I see the ethical dilemma in using this technology to allow a couple with fertility problems to reproduce .
Sure , in this case you do n't know what the odds are , and its possible something will go wrong that could n't go wrong normally .
But everyone who has a child takes the chance that the child might be deformed or sick or die shortly after birth .
Its part of the human condition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course regular parents take this chance every time the conceive a child.I'm not sure I see the ethical dilemma in using this technology to allow a couple with fertility problems to reproduce.
Sure, in this case you don't know what the odds are, and its possible something will go wrong that couldn't go wrong normally.
But everyone who has a child takes the chance that the child might be deformed or sick or die shortly after birth.
Its part of the human condition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>thesandtiger</author>
	<datestamp>1247045220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is it any more a "big can of worm" than infertile hetero couples having children? Are you suggesting that there is some kind of ethical or moral problem with homosexuals having children with this tech that would not apply to heterosexual couples?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is it any more a " big can of worm " than infertile hetero couples having children ?
Are you suggesting that there is some kind of ethical or moral problem with homosexuals having children with this tech that would not apply to heterosexual couples ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is it any more a "big can of worm" than infertile hetero couples having children?
Are you suggesting that there is some kind of ethical or moral problem with homosexuals having children with this tech that would not apply to heterosexual couples?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069</id>
	<title>Sperm Shortage?</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1247081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells?</p><p>Is there a sperm shortage I wasn't aware of?</p><p>Will this allow better quality control?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells ? Is there a sperm shortage I was n't aware of ? Will this allow better quality control ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells?Is there a sperm shortage I wasn't aware of?Will this allow better quality control?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626381</id>
	<title>Re:Sperm Shortage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247082360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells?</p><p>Is there a sperm shortage I wasn't aware of?</p><p>Will this allow better quality control?</p></div></blockquote><p>I know a couple who'd love to conceive a child but he was diagnosed as impotent.</p><p>If this process can be perfected, and if they can harvest Adult Stem Cells from him, then this would allow them to conceive a child together.</p><p>Something that I know would make them both very happy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells ? Is there a sperm shortage I was n't aware of ? Will this allow better quality control ? I know a couple who 'd love to conceive a child but he was diagnosed as impotent.If this process can be perfected , and if they can harvest Adult Stem Cells from him , then this would allow them to conceive a child together.Something that I know would make them both very happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the point of making sperm from stem cells?Is there a sperm shortage I wasn't aware of?Will this allow better quality control?I know a couple who'd love to conceive a child but he was diagnosed as impotent.If this process can be perfected, and if they can harvest Adult Stem Cells from him, then this would allow them to conceive a child together.Something that I know would make them both very happy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630415</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247058900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is probably forbidden by incest laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is probably forbidden by incest laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is probably forbidden by incest laws?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626339</id>
	<title>Great news.</title>
	<author>Sybert42</author>
	<datestamp>1247082300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have testicles.  How long will I have to wait to get sperm cells?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have testicles .
How long will I have to wait to get sperm cells ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have testicles.
How long will I have to wait to get sperm cells?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630577</id>
	<title>Re:One implication</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247059980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well ethical: Everybody can do what he likes, as long as he does not hurt someone outside of his bio-mass. (Which means children are the same bio-mass.)<br>Moral: Wouldn't that be the same thing in this context? Or are you referring to the word being used as a tool to enforce false values (like nudity/sex being somehow bad)?</p><p>But the only problem is, that it is not the usual way of reproduction. So of course it will have some differences.<br>Which can be good, but also bad.</p><p>So there will be problems.<br>The question is: So what? ^^<br>Our moral rules (as stated in the first paragraph) already cover that. It hurts nobody, so it is their freedom.</p><p>We are way beyond normal biological reproduction anyway.<br>One can even say that there is a whole new level, where mindsets are lifeforms, and they reproduce like normal lifeforms.</p><p>I, for one, say: Let's try it, have some fun experimenting, and see what results we get! The worst thing happening can be some children of children of children being unable to survive, or infertile in an unfixable way, making it a bad try. But we will only see what will happen, when we try it!</p><p>The only thing I oppose, is fixing genetic things that should make the people lose natural selection. Because that would be unfair and discriminating to everyone else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well ethical : Everybody can do what he likes , as long as he does not hurt someone outside of his bio-mass .
( Which means children are the same bio-mass .
) Moral : Would n't that be the same thing in this context ?
Or are you referring to the word being used as a tool to enforce false values ( like nudity/sex being somehow bad ) ? But the only problem is , that it is not the usual way of reproduction .
So of course it will have some differences.Which can be good , but also bad.So there will be problems.The question is : So what ?
^ ^ Our moral rules ( as stated in the first paragraph ) already cover that .
It hurts nobody , so it is their freedom.We are way beyond normal biological reproduction anyway.One can even say that there is a whole new level , where mindsets are lifeforms , and they reproduce like normal lifeforms.I , for one , say : Let 's try it , have some fun experimenting , and see what results we get !
The worst thing happening can be some children of children of children being unable to survive , or infertile in an unfixable way , making it a bad try .
But we will only see what will happen , when we try it ! The only thing I oppose , is fixing genetic things that should make the people lose natural selection .
Because that would be unfair and discriminating to everyone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well ethical: Everybody can do what he likes, as long as he does not hurt someone outside of his bio-mass.
(Which means children are the same bio-mass.
)Moral: Wouldn't that be the same thing in this context?
Or are you referring to the word being used as a tool to enforce false values (like nudity/sex being somehow bad)?But the only problem is, that it is not the usual way of reproduction.
So of course it will have some differences.Which can be good, but also bad.So there will be problems.The question is: So what?
^^Our moral rules (as stated in the first paragraph) already cover that.
It hurts nobody, so it is their freedom.We are way beyond normal biological reproduction anyway.One can even say that there is a whole new level, where mindsets are lifeforms, and they reproduce like normal lifeforms.I, for one, say: Let's try it, have some fun experimenting, and see what results we get!
The worst thing happening can be some children of children of children being unable to survive, or infertile in an unfixable way, making it a bad try.
But we will only see what will happen, when we try it!The only thing I oppose, is fixing genetic things that should make the people lose natural selection.
Because that would be unfair and discriminating to everyone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>BCW2</author>
	<datestamp>1247081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627955</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>nycguy</author>
	<datestamp>1247045760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our child-bearing lesbian overlords...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our child-bearing lesbian overlords.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our child-bearing lesbian overlords...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631919</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>hobo sapiens</author>
	<datestamp>1247069820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well, that and driving around strange cities.  And making rational decisions.  Oh, and blowing stuff up!  Women will never do *that* very well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well , that and driving around strange cities .
And making rational decisions .
Oh , and blowing stuff up !
Women will never do * that * very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, that and driving around strange cities.
And making rational decisions.
Oh, and blowing stuff up!
Women will never do *that* very well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634769</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>autoevolution</author>
	<datestamp>1247145480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, wouldn't this be more like cloning than incest?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , would n't this be more like cloning than incest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, wouldn't this be more like cloning than incest?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626169</id>
	<title>Same as always</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Infrequently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Infrequently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Infrequently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632569</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1247076720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men!</p></div></blockquote><p>

Is anyone working on a device to open jars?<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Grabs shotgun.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men !
Is anyone working on a device to open jars ?
/Grabs shotgun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add this to the turkey baster and women will have even less use for us men!
Is anyone working on a device to open jars?
/Grabs shotgun.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28645831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630107
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28655181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28637019
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627389
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_08_186205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626585
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627463
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630289
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631407
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631527
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633549
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628023
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629673
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28637019
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629087
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632165
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631127
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630415
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630091
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631709
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639793
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630107
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631119
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631135
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634769
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631323
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629891
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632735
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630055
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630215
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631387
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627115
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629589
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28633517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28639883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626123
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626229
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634555
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28638821
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626183
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28632589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28645831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28657481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28635737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627855
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630577
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628775
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28629071
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28634409
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28655181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626405
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626891
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28628895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626241
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28631919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28627073
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28625959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28630787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_08_186205.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_08_186205.28626291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
