<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_07_1357237</id>
	<title>VLC 1.0.0 Released</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246976160000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>rift321 writes <i>"<a href="http://www.videolan.org/">VLC media player</a>, which we all know for simplifying the playback of pretty much any codec out there, has <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505\_3-10280845-16.html">finally released version 1.0.0</a>. Here's a quick list of improvements: live recording, instant pausing and frame-by-frame support, finer speed controls, new HD codecs (AES3, Dolby Digital Plus, TrueHD, Blu-Ray Linear PCM, Real Video 3.0 and 4.0), new formats (Raw Dirac, M2TS) and major improvements in many formats, new Dirac encoder and MP3 fixed-point encoder, video scaling in fullscreen, RTSP Trickplay support, zipped file playback, customizable toolbars, easier encoding GUI in Qt interface, better integration in Gtk environments, MTP devices on Linux, and AirTunes streaming."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>rift321 writes " VLC media player , which we all know for simplifying the playback of pretty much any codec out there , has finally released version 1.0.0 .
Here 's a quick list of improvements : live recording , instant pausing and frame-by-frame support , finer speed controls , new HD codecs ( AES3 , Dolby Digital Plus , TrueHD , Blu-Ray Linear PCM , Real Video 3.0 and 4.0 ) , new formats ( Raw Dirac , M2TS ) and major improvements in many formats , new Dirac encoder and MP3 fixed-point encoder , video scaling in fullscreen , RTSP Trickplay support , zipped file playback , customizable toolbars , easier encoding GUI in Qt interface , better integration in Gtk environments , MTP devices on Linux , and AirTunes streaming .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rift321 writes "VLC media player, which we all know for simplifying the playback of pretty much any codec out there, has finally released version 1.0.0.
Here's a quick list of improvements: live recording, instant pausing and frame-by-frame support, finer speed controls, new HD codecs (AES3, Dolby Digital Plus, TrueHD, Blu-Ray Linear PCM, Real Video 3.0 and 4.0), new formats (Raw Dirac, M2TS) and major improvements in many formats, new Dirac encoder and MP3 fixed-point encoder, video scaling in fullscreen, RTSP Trickplay support, zipped file playback, customizable toolbars, easier encoding GUI in Qt interface, better integration in Gtk environments, MTP devices on Linux, and AirTunes streaming.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617203</id>
	<title>"Closed Captions" isn't quite "captions"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Closed Captions" are a specific USA technlogy/standard, one way of implementing 'captions'.  "Closed Captions" are technlogically distinct from the subtitle/subprogram streams on a DVD (and only seem to exist on NTSC DVDs).</p><p>A subtitle/subprogram stream on a DVD can have either captions or subtitles.  But subprogram/subtitle streams are distinct from "Closed Caption" data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Closed Captions " are a specific USA technlogy/standard , one way of implementing 'captions' .
" Closed Captions " are technlogically distinct from the subtitle/subprogram streams on a DVD ( and only seem to exist on NTSC DVDs ) .A subtitle/subprogram stream on a DVD can have either captions or subtitles .
But subprogram/subtitle streams are distinct from " Closed Caption " data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Closed Captions" are a specific USA technlogy/standard, one way of implementing 'captions'.
"Closed Captions" are technlogically distinct from the subtitle/subprogram streams on a DVD (and only seem to exist on NTSC DVDs).A subtitle/subprogram stream on a DVD can have either captions or subtitles.
But subprogram/subtitle streams are distinct from "Closed Caption" data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608839</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1246984140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're in luck: <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=Njk1NA" title="phoronix.com">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=Njk1NA</a> [phoronix.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're in luck : http : //www.phoronix.com/scan.php ? page = news \ _item&amp;px = Njk1NA [ phoronix.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're in luck: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=Njk1NA [phoronix.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609029</id>
	<title>OSX 10.4 support dropped...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't update your VLC if you have OSX 10.4.x (or 10.3.9). VLC dropped 10.4 support for "technical reasons" in 1.0.0rc2, the newer version that works on 10.4 is 0.9.9a.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't update your VLC if you have OSX 10.4.x ( or 10.3.9 ) .
VLC dropped 10.4 support for " technical reasons " in 1.0.0rc2 , the newer version that works on 10.4 is 0.9.9a .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't update your VLC if you have OSX 10.4.x (or 10.3.9).
VLC dropped 10.4 support for "technical reasons" in 1.0.0rc2, the newer version that works on 10.4 is 0.9.9a.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611079</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>retro83</author>
	<datestamp>1246992960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if this is what you meant, but at least on OSX it is broken in that it now does not tell you what percentage the volume control is set to.

This is only really a problem because the volume goes above 100\% without snapping at the point where you reach full volume.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if this is what you meant , but at least on OSX it is broken in that it now does not tell you what percentage the volume control is set to .
This is only really a problem because the volume goes above 100 \ % without snapping at the point where you reach full volume .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if this is what you meant, but at least on OSX it is broken in that it now does not tell you what percentage the volume control is set to.
This is only really a problem because the volume goes above 100\% without snapping at the point where you reach full volume.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609383</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1246986300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.</p><p>VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.</p><p>VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.</p></div><p>I think it's more convenient to download codecs as you need them, not in a pack, because every time I use a pack I find that it breaks something that worked before.  Installing xvid covers most of my needs, and in the rare case that I need something else, I go get it.  I like the full screen UI a lot better on WMP or MPC, but VLC's is no longer terrible and I know the keyboard shortcuts too.</p><p>That said, I use VLC a lot.  For a long time it was my backup player for things that wouldn't let me skip properly in MPC, or took too long to start the video moving again after a skip.  Recently I switched over to using VLC by default because a lot of TV episodes have the skip problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC has shitty subtitle support , why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none , with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.VLC has shitty subtitle support , why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none , with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.I think it 's more convenient to download codecs as you need them , not in a pack , because every time I use a pack I find that it breaks something that worked before .
Installing xvid covers most of my needs , and in the rare case that I need something else , I go get it .
I like the full screen UI a lot better on WMP or MPC , but VLC 's is no longer terrible and I know the keyboard shortcuts too.That said , I use VLC a lot .
For a long time it was my backup player for things that would n't let me skip properly in MPC , or took too long to start the video moving again after a skip .
Recently I switched over to using VLC by default because a lot of TV episodes have the skip problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.I think it's more convenient to download codecs as you need them, not in a pack, because every time I use a pack I find that it breaks something that worked before.
Installing xvid covers most of my needs, and in the rare case that I need something else, I go get it.
I like the full screen UI a lot better on WMP or MPC, but VLC's is no longer terrible and I know the keyboard shortcuts too.That said, I use VLC a lot.
For a long time it was my backup player for things that wouldn't let me skip properly in MPC, or took too long to start the video moving again after a skip.
Recently I switched over to using VLC by default because a lot of TV episodes have the skip problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609577</id>
	<title>Re:Talk to the frog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246987020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go take your advertisement somewhere else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go take your advertisement somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go take your advertisement somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610333</id>
	<title>Why does VLC render video like crap?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Default install of VLC, video is incredibly blocky compared to WMP, GOM Player, or J River Media Center. This is for nearly any video I throw at it, it looks better in any other player. What gives?<br>VLC: <a href="http://imgur.com/o5HbC.png" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/o5HbC.png</a> [imgur.com]<br>WMP: <a href="http://imgur.com/hjmaF.png" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/hjmaF.png</a> [imgur.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Default install of VLC , video is incredibly blocky compared to WMP , GOM Player , or J River Media Center .
This is for nearly any video I throw at it , it looks better in any other player .
What gives ? VLC : http : //imgur.com/o5HbC.png [ imgur.com ] WMP : http : //imgur.com/hjmaF.png [ imgur.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Default install of VLC, video is incredibly blocky compared to WMP, GOM Player, or J River Media Center.
This is for nearly any video I throw at it, it looks better in any other player.
What gives?VLC: http://imgur.com/o5HbC.png [imgur.com]WMP: http://imgur.com/hjmaF.png [imgur.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</id>
	<title>Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>NitroWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246984800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't seem to find any additional information on the zipped file playback stated in the summary.  Can anyone elaborate on that?  Do they literally mean it will only play files that are zipped, or will it finally play back multi-part RAR files?  I (and many others) have been asking for this functionality for years now - I even went so far as to submit a patch for this functionality... however, the developers (at least at the time) were whiny little princesses and refused to implement a feature like that because it compromises the integrity of VLC (no seriously, that was the reason).</p><p>As such, the lack of multi-part RAR playback has made VLC pretty much useless for serious media centers.  If they've finally backpeddled and implemented this feature, my hat is off to them for manning up and accepting the fact that multipart RARs are a standard (however unfortunate that is) and the ability to play back media that is in that "format" is a necessity for a good player.</p><p>If they have still not implemented this functionality, however, VLC is still fairly useless for true universal media players, since other software is capable of it and works just as well if not better.</p><p>So - can anyone elaborate on that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't seem to find any additional information on the zipped file playback stated in the summary .
Can anyone elaborate on that ?
Do they literally mean it will only play files that are zipped , or will it finally play back multi-part RAR files ?
I ( and many others ) have been asking for this functionality for years now - I even went so far as to submit a patch for this functionality... however , the developers ( at least at the time ) were whiny little princesses and refused to implement a feature like that because it compromises the integrity of VLC ( no seriously , that was the reason ) .As such , the lack of multi-part RAR playback has made VLC pretty much useless for serious media centers .
If they 've finally backpeddled and implemented this feature , my hat is off to them for manning up and accepting the fact that multipart RARs are a standard ( however unfortunate that is ) and the ability to play back media that is in that " format " is a necessity for a good player.If they have still not implemented this functionality , however , VLC is still fairly useless for true universal media players , since other software is capable of it and works just as well if not better.So - can anyone elaborate on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't seem to find any additional information on the zipped file playback stated in the summary.
Can anyone elaborate on that?
Do they literally mean it will only play files that are zipped, or will it finally play back multi-part RAR files?
I (and many others) have been asking for this functionality for years now - I even went so far as to submit a patch for this functionality... however, the developers (at least at the time) were whiny little princesses and refused to implement a feature like that because it compromises the integrity of VLC (no seriously, that was the reason).As such, the lack of multi-part RAR playback has made VLC pretty much useless for serious media centers.
If they've finally backpeddled and implemented this feature, my hat is off to them for manning up and accepting the fact that multipart RARs are a standard (however unfortunate that is) and the ability to play back media that is in that "format" is a necessity for a good player.If they have still not implemented this functionality, however, VLC is still fairly useless for true universal media players, since other software is capable of it and works just as well if not better.So - can anyone elaborate on that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613789</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Falcon4</author>
	<datestamp>1246960380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then, it boils down to one further argument: would you rather have it not doing what they want it to do because:<br>- they were stupid and installed viruses on their system, and need to learn from their experiences...?<br>or<br>- because the OS wasn't even designed to do what you want it to do to begin with?</p><p>In other words, which would you rather spend your time fixing? Something that you/they broke... or something that shouldn't've even been broke to begin with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then , it boils down to one further argument : would you rather have it not doing what they want it to do because : - they were stupid and installed viruses on their system , and need to learn from their experiences... ? or- because the OS was n't even designed to do what you want it to do to begin with ? In other words , which would you rather spend your time fixing ?
Something that you/they broke... or something that should n't've even been broke to begin with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then, it boils down to one further argument: would you rather have it not doing what they want it to do because:- they were stupid and installed viruses on their system, and need to learn from their experiences...?or- because the OS wasn't even designed to do what you want it to do to begin with?In other words, which would you rather spend your time fixing?
Something that you/they broke... or something that shouldn't've even been broke to begin with?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608039</id>
	<title>Download Broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The download finishes instantly at 0 bytes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The download finishes instantly at 0 bytes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The download finishes instantly at 0 bytes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616357</id>
	<title>If it's so f&amp;^king good, why disable forums/wi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246974600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their forums and wiki on videolan.org have been shut off due to high traffic.</p><p>I suspect that there's enough people writing in to say WTF that they couldn't handle the load AND fix the bugs they created</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their forums and wiki on videolan.org have been shut off due to high traffic.I suspect that there 's enough people writing in to say WTF that they could n't handle the load AND fix the bugs they created</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their forums and wiki on videolan.org have been shut off due to high traffic.I suspect that there's enough people writing in to say WTF that they couldn't handle the load AND fix the bugs they created</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609147</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you haven't tried 1.0.0, where SSA subtitles have been greatly improved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you have n't tried 1.0.0 , where SSA subtitles have been greatly improved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you haven't tried 1.0.0, where SSA subtitles have been greatly improved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608785</id>
	<title>Media player?</title>
	<author>BenoitRen</author>
	<datestamp>1246983960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just a media player when it also supports live recording and media encoding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just a media player when it also supports live recording and media encoding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just a media player when it also supports live recording and media encoding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610821</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1246992060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Charge them for the service, even something small like $5-per-issue works. Unless you're forced to use the same machines, in which case charge them and always keep a Xubuntu LiveCD on your backpack.</p><p>You wouldn't believe how careful people are with their computers when it starts affecting their bottom line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Charge them for the service , even something small like $ 5-per-issue works .
Unless you 're forced to use the same machines , in which case charge them and always keep a Xubuntu LiveCD on your backpack.You would n't believe how careful people are with their computers when it starts affecting their bottom line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charge them for the service, even something small like $5-per-issue works.
Unless you're forced to use the same machines, in which case charge them and always keep a Xubuntu LiveCD on your backpack.You wouldn't believe how careful people are with their computers when it starts affecting their bottom line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610535</id>
	<title>Re:No longer in beta?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so <b>that's</b> why Google dropped the beta tag today... Good work VLC!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so that 's why Google dropped the beta tag today... Good work VLC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so that's why Google dropped the beta tag today... Good work VLC!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610983</id>
	<title>Is it missing iPhone / Quicktime-X HTTP Streaming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246992600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With iPhone 3.0 and the comming Quicktime 10 (Snow Leopard) there is a new way of making "streaming".</p><p>It is a sequence of HTTP download from small Mpeg2TS file based on an extended playlist.<br>It does work for VoD and for PseudoLive (with 30-40 sec of delay).</p><p>So it is not progressive download.<br>It is not a proprietary protocol such as what Flash is doing.<br>It is note real streaming (RTSP/RTP) like a Darwin Streaming Server does.</p><p>If this new way of pushing content to an iPhone and potentially all the QuickTime user does work... many content (Live of VoD) will be available in that format.</p><p>VLC can read Mpeg2TS and Mpeg2PS.<br>It surely can read a standard playlist.</p><p>But it may lack the little tweeking to behave like an iPhone (at least from the client side).</p><p>Does it?</p><p>Of course since VLC is also a streamer, they may want to implement the encoding side of the story... but there are existing source code to produce that kind of format.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With iPhone 3.0 and the comming Quicktime 10 ( Snow Leopard ) there is a new way of making " streaming " .It is a sequence of HTTP download from small Mpeg2TS file based on an extended playlist.It does work for VoD and for PseudoLive ( with 30-40 sec of delay ) .So it is not progressive download.It is not a proprietary protocol such as what Flash is doing.It is note real streaming ( RTSP/RTP ) like a Darwin Streaming Server does.If this new way of pushing content to an iPhone and potentially all the QuickTime user does work... many content ( Live of VoD ) will be available in that format.VLC can read Mpeg2TS and Mpeg2PS.It surely can read a standard playlist.But it may lack the little tweeking to behave like an iPhone ( at least from the client side ) .Does it ? Of course since VLC is also a streamer , they may want to implement the encoding side of the story... but there are existing source code to produce that kind of format .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With iPhone 3.0 and the comming Quicktime 10 (Snow Leopard) there is a new way of making "streaming".It is a sequence of HTTP download from small Mpeg2TS file based on an extended playlist.It does work for VoD and for PseudoLive (with 30-40 sec of delay).So it is not progressive download.It is not a proprietary protocol such as what Flash is doing.It is note real streaming (RTSP/RTP) like a Darwin Streaming Server does.If this new way of pushing content to an iPhone and potentially all the QuickTime user does work... many content (Live of VoD) will be available in that format.VLC can read Mpeg2TS and Mpeg2PS.It surely can read a standard playlist.But it may lack the little tweeking to behave like an iPhone (at least from the client side).Does it?Of course since VLC is also a streamer, they may want to implement the encoding side of the story... but there are existing source code to produce that kind of format.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608523</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>cranky\_slacker</author>
	<datestamp>1246983000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hate to go off topic, but I was having a similar problem and so far, Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer couldn't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to go off topic , but I was having a similar problem and so far , Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer could n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to go off topic, but I was having a similar problem and so far, Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer couldn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609581</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1246987020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html) not obvious?</p><p>"VLC media player for Mac OS X<br>Latest Mac OS X package for 10.5 and 10.6 (release 1.0.0)<br>universal binary (29MB)<br>latest platform specific packages for 10.5 and 10.6 (release 1.0.0)<br>intel package (17.9MB)<br>powerpc package (17.8MB)<br>Last Mac OS X package for 10.4 (release 0.9.9a)"</p><p>I mean yeah, I had to scroll to the bottom of the page for the 10.4 info but....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shrug</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this ( http : //www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html ) not obvious ?
" VLC media player for Mac OS XLatest Mac OS X package for 10.5 and 10.6 ( release 1.0.0 ) universal binary ( 29MB ) latest platform specific packages for 10.5 and 10.6 ( release 1.0.0 ) intel package ( 17.9MB ) powerpc package ( 17.8MB ) Last Mac OS X package for 10.4 ( release 0.9.9a ) " I mean yeah , I had to scroll to the bottom of the page for the 10.4 info but.... /shrug</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html) not obvious?
"VLC media player for Mac OS XLatest Mac OS X package for 10.5 and 10.6 (release 1.0.0)universal binary (29MB)latest platform specific packages for 10.5 and 10.6 (release 1.0.0)intel package (17.9MB)powerpc package (17.8MB)Last Mac OS X package for 10.4 (release 0.9.9a)"I mean yeah, I had to scroll to the bottom of the page for the 10.4 info but.... /shrug</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608685</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>kingtut</author>
	<datestamp>1246983540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Janet Jackson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Janet Jackson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Janet Jackson.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612231</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1246997340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gave you a free fucking media player.  Don't like it?  Don't use it.  And, don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gave you a free fucking media player .
Do n't like it ?
Do n't use it .
And , do n't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gave you a free fucking media player.
Don't like it?
Don't use it.
And, don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607989</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246980840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Would I have to pay royalties to MPEG LA to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media player</p></div><p>No, it will play just fine.</p><p>Oh, you mean, do you have to pay royalties to watch it <em>legally</em>? Probably. Do you follow <em>every law on the books</em> or are you just trolling?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would I have to pay royalties to MPEG LA to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media playerNo , it will play just fine.Oh , you mean , do you have to pay royalties to watch it legally ?
Probably. Do you follow every law on the books or are you just trolling ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would I have to pay royalties to MPEG LA to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media playerNo, it will play just fine.Oh, you mean, do you have to pay royalties to watch it legally?
Probably. Do you follow every law on the books or are you just trolling?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608149</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was Janet Jackson, not Michael, moron.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was Janet Jackson , not Michael , moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was Janet Jackson, not Michael, moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611023</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>ninjamonkey26</author>
	<datestamp>1246992720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could ask for Purevideo support (nvidia graphics card hd playback codec) given that it has been added to the opensource mediaplayer classic for quite a while now. Once they have that I'll gladly call vlc the very best.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could ask for Purevideo support ( nvidia graphics card hd playback codec ) given that it has been added to the opensource mediaplayer classic for quite a while now .
Once they have that I 'll gladly call vlc the very best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could ask for Purevideo support (nvidia graphics card hd playback codec) given that it has been added to the opensource mediaplayer classic for quite a while now.
Once they have that I'll gladly call vlc the very best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611613</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246994940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG. I loathe those multi-RAR torrents. They are made by total retards! Especially those with an extra checksum file.</p><p>BitTorrent already contains checksums, splitting, compression, directories, and much more. So the whole point of multi-RARs is gone.</p><p>Maybe they still use alt.binary to share their stuff. But then I have to say: Welcome to the 21st century!! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG .
I loathe those multi-RAR torrents .
They are made by total retards !
Especially those with an extra checksum file.BitTorrent already contains checksums , splitting , compression , directories , and much more .
So the whole point of multi-RARs is gone.Maybe they still use alt.binary to share their stuff .
But then I have to say : Welcome to the 21st century ! !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG.
I loathe those multi-RAR torrents.
They are made by total retards!
Especially those with an extra checksum file.BitTorrent already contains checksums, splitting, compression, directories, and much more.
So the whole point of multi-RARs is gone.Maybe they still use alt.binary to share their stuff.
But then I have to say: Welcome to the 21st century!!
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615009</id>
	<title>Raw H.264 playback still broken?</title>
	<author>dougr650</author>
	<datestamp>1246965360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they still haven't fixed playback of raw H.264 files (without any transport stream or other wrapper), then I'm going to have to continue to stick with 0.8.6.  This has been broken for a ridiculously long time now and no one but me seems to have complained about it.  I love VLC, but it hasn't decoded "everything under the sun" in quite some time.  I last checked the 0.9.9 versions on both Windows and linux, and both failed to play any of a set of H.264 reference videos.  H.264 is pretty standard now, and the inability to play back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.264 files is a fairly serious defect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they still have n't fixed playback of raw H.264 files ( without any transport stream or other wrapper ) , then I 'm going to have to continue to stick with 0.8.6 .
This has been broken for a ridiculously long time now and no one but me seems to have complained about it .
I love VLC , but it has n't decoded " everything under the sun " in quite some time .
I last checked the 0.9.9 versions on both Windows and linux , and both failed to play any of a set of H.264 reference videos .
H.264 is pretty standard now , and the inability to play back .264 files is a fairly serious defect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they still haven't fixed playback of raw H.264 files (without any transport stream or other wrapper), then I'm going to have to continue to stick with 0.8.6.
This has been broken for a ridiculously long time now and no one but me seems to have complained about it.
I love VLC, but it hasn't decoded "everything under the sun" in quite some time.
I last checked the 0.9.9 versions on both Windows and linux, and both failed to play any of a set of H.264 reference videos.
H.264 is pretty standard now, and the inability to play back .264 files is a fairly serious defect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608695</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Winckle</author>
	<datestamp>1246983600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's great for taking DVD screen grabs too.</p><p>Of purely non-pornographical content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's great for taking DVD screen grabs too.Of purely non-pornographical content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's great for taking DVD screen grabs too.Of purely non-pornographical content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610409</id>
	<title>Re:Best way to upgrade? (or Videolan's website suc</title>
	<author>SpacePirate20X6</author>
	<datestamp>1246990500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They tend to stagger the updates just a bit on the automatic updates... They post it on the website for those who absolutely must have it now, while the casual users, using a perfectly good 0.9.9a, will get it sometime over the course of the next few days, or when they next get around to opening it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They tend to stagger the updates just a bit on the automatic updates... They post it on the website for those who absolutely must have it now , while the casual users , using a perfectly good 0.9.9a , will get it sometime over the course of the next few days , or when they next get around to opening it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They tend to stagger the updates just a bit on the automatic updates... They post it on the website for those who absolutely must have it now, while the casual users, using a perfectly good 0.9.9a, will get it sometime over the course of the next few days, or when they next get around to opening it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609365</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1246986300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about 10.2.8? I still use Jaguar on my old PowerBook G4 with 512 MB of RAM.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about 10.2.8 ?
I still use Jaguar on my old PowerBook G4 with 512 MB of RAM .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about 10.2.8?
I still use Jaguar on my old PowerBook G4 with 512 MB of RAM.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607999</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246980900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It probably depends on your jurisdiction, and on whether you care about violating the license. You certainly don't need a license to make the software work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably depends on your jurisdiction , and on whether you care about violating the license .
You certainly do n't need a license to make the software work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably depends on your jurisdiction, and on whether you care about violating the license.
You certainly don't need a license to make the software work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609625</id>
	<title>Time to change their icon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246987200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every time I see their "construction site cone" icon I involuntarily think that the software is still heavily under construction... and hence not mature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I see their " construction site cone " icon I involuntarily think that the software is still heavily under construction... and hence not mature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I see their "construction site cone" icon I involuntarily think that the software is still heavily under construction... and hence not mature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1246984680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>VLC has impressed me time and time again. I worship it for its simplicity.</p></div><p>I think you're thinking of something else.  VLC is neat, cross-platform, and awesome, but I've never heard anyone describe it as "simple" with a straight face.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC has impressed me time and time again .
I worship it for its simplicity.I think you 're thinking of something else .
VLC is neat , cross-platform , and awesome , but I 've never heard anyone describe it as " simple " with a straight face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC has impressed me time and time again.
I worship it for its simplicity.I think you're thinking of something else.
VLC is neat, cross-platform, and awesome, but I've never heard anyone describe it as "simple" with a straight face.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610371</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.</p></div><p>That reminds me of a room in my elementary school.  My dad always called it the cafetoranasium because it was a combination of a cafeteria, auditorium, and a gymnasium.  He also liked the to call it multi useless room, becuase it wasn't quite multi purpose because it didn't do any one thing well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have a dozen tools , each of which excells at it 's one thing , than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.That reminds me of a room in my elementary school .
My dad always called it the cafetoranasium because it was a combination of a cafeteria , auditorium , and a gymnasium .
He also liked the to call it multi useless room , becuase it was n't quite multi purpose because it did n't do any one thing well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.That reminds me of a room in my elementary school.
My dad always called it the cafetoranasium because it was a combination of a cafeteria, auditorium, and a gymnasium.
He also liked the to call it multi useless room, becuase it wasn't quite multi purpose because it didn't do any one thing well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611315</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246993800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey - go ahead and mod him Funny, but porn is srs bsns.  Wankers are the power user of video players.  We need:</p><ol> <li>Instant Pausing</li>
<li>frame step forward AND frame step backward</li>
<li>skip ahead, skip time set in prefs (default something like 5 seconds)</li>
<li>thumbwheel support and a slider bar</li>
<li>bookmarks with thumbnails</li>
<li>robust error handling for bad files and scratched DVDs</li>
<li>ignore autoplay and other odious crap installed on commercial DVDs</li>
<li>timely codec updates</li></ol><p>If VLC can at least manage the first four, I may pay for an upgrade to OS X 10.5 - I'm getting tired of Quicktime Player and DVD Player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey - go ahead and mod him Funny , but porn is srs bsns .
Wankers are the power user of video players .
We need : Instant Pausing frame step forward AND frame step backward skip ahead , skip time set in prefs ( default something like 5 seconds ) thumbwheel support and a slider bar bookmarks with thumbnails robust error handling for bad files and scratched DVDs ignore autoplay and other odious crap installed on commercial DVDs timely codec updatesIf VLC can at least manage the first four , I may pay for an upgrade to OS X 10.5 - I 'm getting tired of Quicktime Player and DVD Player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey - go ahead and mod him Funny, but porn is srs bsns.
Wankers are the power user of video players.
We need: Instant Pausing
frame step forward AND frame step backward
skip ahead, skip time set in prefs (default something like 5 seconds)
thumbwheel support and a slider bar
bookmarks with thumbnails
robust error handling for bad files and scratched DVDs
ignore autoplay and other odious crap installed on commercial DVDs
timely codec updatesIf VLC can at least manage the first four, I may pay for an upgrade to OS X 10.5 - I'm getting tired of Quicktime Player and DVD Player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246986300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But neither one, as far as I can tell, can do one thing that mplayer does: Display closed captioning. No, that's not DVD subtitles. It's purely a US American thing, so is routinely ignored, or at least misunderstood, by the international communities that maintain these products.</i></p><p>What do deaf people in Europe do for TV then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But neither one , as far as I can tell , can do one thing that mplayer does : Display closed captioning .
No , that 's not DVD subtitles .
It 's purely a US American thing , so is routinely ignored , or at least misunderstood , by the international communities that maintain these products.What do deaf people in Europe do for TV then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But neither one, as far as I can tell, can do one thing that mplayer does: Display closed captioning.
No, that's not DVD subtitles.
It's purely a US American thing, so is routinely ignored, or at least misunderstood, by the international communities that maintain these products.What do deaf people in Europe do for TV then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617967</id>
	<title>GUI still sux</title>
	<author>saur2004</author>
	<datestamp>1246989000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about implementing a true repeat one/all sceme instead of that annoying A-&gt;B function.<br>

How about cleaning up the numerous bugs in the shoutcast browser.<br>

Oh of course we cant have changes where they really count, can we?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about implementing a true repeat one/all sceme instead of that annoying A- &gt; B function .
How about cleaning up the numerous bugs in the shoutcast browser .
Oh of course we cant have changes where they really count , can we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about implementing a true repeat one/all sceme instead of that annoying A-&gt;B function.
How about cleaning up the numerous bugs in the shoutcast browser.
Oh of course we cant have changes where they really count, can we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615561</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>LarryRiedel</author>
	<datestamp>1246968720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I have had a couple problems which I think are
separate.  One is that the DVDs are munched, so
trying to do a filesystem copy fails because
there are so many bad sectors, which are not part
of the actual content... knowing what is actual
valid content requires following the menus rather
than treating the DVD as a filesystem.  It seems
like some versions of libdvdnav4 are able to
figure out what bytes are part of the content.
</p><p>
The other problem I seem to have had is the
offsets in the menus for chapters and titles
is mangled, so the DVD may appear to have 99
titles, each with a long list of offsets for
where the chapter content is, and the only way
to figure out which title is the real one is
play the DVD via the menu, and let it jump
from one title to another.  I recently did
this with a DVD with "mplayer -v -identify dvdnav://"
and saw it eventually wound up on Title 58;
then if I just started by playing dvdnav://58,
it worked ok.  If I used, say "dvdnav://1", it
would skip over a lot of the content.  Each
of the titles (dvdnav://10 or whatever) would
look like the right thing-- many chapters and
a runtime of about the correct length, but it
would skip around-- it played the content,
but not all of it.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have had a couple problems which I think are separate .
One is that the DVDs are munched , so trying to do a filesystem copy fails because there are so many bad sectors , which are not part of the actual content... knowing what is actual valid content requires following the menus rather than treating the DVD as a filesystem .
It seems like some versions of libdvdnav4 are able to figure out what bytes are part of the content .
The other problem I seem to have had is the offsets in the menus for chapters and titles is mangled , so the DVD may appear to have 99 titles , each with a long list of offsets for where the chapter content is , and the only way to figure out which title is the real one is play the DVD via the menu , and let it jump from one title to another .
I recently did this with a DVD with " mplayer -v -identify dvdnav : // " and saw it eventually wound up on Title 58 ; then if I just started by playing dvdnav : //58 , it worked ok. If I used , say " dvdnav : //1 " , it would skip over a lot of the content .
Each of the titles ( dvdnav : //10 or whatever ) would look like the right thing-- many chapters and a runtime of about the correct length , but it would skip around-- it played the content , but not all of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I have had a couple problems which I think are
separate.
One is that the DVDs are munched, so
trying to do a filesystem copy fails because
there are so many bad sectors, which are not part
of the actual content... knowing what is actual
valid content requires following the menus rather
than treating the DVD as a filesystem.
It seems
like some versions of libdvdnav4 are able to
figure out what bytes are part of the content.
The other problem I seem to have had is the
offsets in the menus for chapters and titles
is mangled, so the DVD may appear to have 99
titles, each with a long list of offsets for
where the chapter content is, and the only way
to figure out which title is the real one is
play the DVD via the menu, and let it jump
from one title to another.
I recently did
this with a DVD with "mplayer -v -identify dvdnav://"
and saw it eventually wound up on Title 58;
then if I just started by playing dvdnav://58,
it worked ok.  If I used, say "dvdnav://1", it
would skip over a lot of the content.
Each
of the titles (dvdnav://10 or whatever) would
look like the right thing-- many chapters and
a runtime of about the correct length, but it
would skip around-- it played the content,
but not all of it.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28622887</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>ivano</author>
	<datestamp>1247070180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've never used it on a Mac then I assume. Because you would change your mind pretty quickly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've never used it on a Mac then I assume .
Because you would change your mind pretty quickly : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've never used it on a Mac then I assume.
Because you would change your mind pretty quickly :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614105</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>4v4l0n42</author>
	<datestamp>1246961580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform</p></div></blockquote><p>

How about <a href="http://www.mplayerhq.hu/" title="mplayerhq.hu" rel="nofollow">MPlayer</a> [mplayerhq.hu] and its <a href="http://smplayer.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">various</a> [sourceforge.net] <a href="http://mplayerosx.sttz.ch/" title="mplayerosx.sttz.ch" rel="nofollow">Grafical</a> [mplayerosx.sttz.ch] <a href="http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/projects.html" title="mplayerhq.hu" rel="nofollow">User Interfaces</a> [mplayerhq.hu]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I 've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform How about MPlayer [ mplayerhq.hu ] and its various [ sourceforge.net ] Grafical [ mplayerosx.sttz.ch ] User Interfaces [ mplayerhq.hu ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform

How about MPlayer [mplayerhq.hu] and its various [sourceforge.net] Grafical [mplayerosx.sttz.ch] User Interfaces [mplayerhq.hu]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611473</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1246994460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called a "troll". Don't feed it, or it'll come back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called a " troll " .
Do n't feed it , or it 'll come back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called a "troll".
Don't feed it, or it'll come back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617705</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Mike610544</author>
	<datestamp>1246986660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Still, it's a great do it all player / streamer.</p></div><p>Based on this new version I'd say it is. They seem to have fixed all the sketchy UI stuff (didn't there used to be a bunch of values of "-1" for defaults?) and also jumping to different points in a video is seamless now (much better than WMP.) I used to get a few seconds of weird colors when changing location. Good work VLC devs!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still , it 's a great do it all player / streamer.Based on this new version I 'd say it is .
They seem to have fixed all the sketchy UI stuff ( did n't there used to be a bunch of values of " -1 " for defaults ?
) and also jumping to different points in a video is seamless now ( much better than WMP .
) I used to get a few seconds of weird colors when changing location .
Good work VLC devs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still, it's a great do it all player / streamer.Based on this new version I'd say it is.
They seem to have fixed all the sketchy UI stuff (didn't there used to be a bunch of values of "-1" for defaults?
) and also jumping to different points in a video is seamless now (much better than WMP.
) I used to get a few seconds of weird colors when changing location.
Good work VLC devs!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>VLC supports hardware acceleration on nVidia G80 and higher hardware using VDPAU on Linux. As soon as ATI releases a XvBA driver, hardware acceleration should be possible through VAAPI.</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC supports hardware acceleration on nVidia G80 and higher hardware using VDPAU on Linux .
As soon as ATI releases a XvBA driver , hardware acceleration should be possible through VAAPI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC supports hardware acceleration on nVidia G80 and higher hardware using VDPAU on Linux.
As soon as ATI releases a XvBA driver, hardware acceleration should be possible through VAAPI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609315</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246986120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>it's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate, who both say "if it can't play a DVD, I'm not using it". Sigh</i></p><p>Don't sell linux.  Quitting windows is like quitting smoking, if deep down you don't really want to quit, you never will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate , who both say " if it ca n't play a DVD , I 'm not using it " .
SighDo n't sell linux .
Quitting windows is like quitting smoking , if deep down you do n't really want to quit , you never will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate, who both say "if it can't play a DVD, I'm not using it".
SighDon't sell linux.
Quitting windows is like quitting smoking, if deep down you don't really want to quit, you never will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610415</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>thyarcher</author>
	<datestamp>1246990500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, they did fix the sound control from being directly tied to the scroll wheel.  There is now an option in the hotkey selection window to allow the scroll wheel to seek or be ignored and subsequently mapped to a hotkey.

I just noticed the setting this release.  Since it was a pulldown option instead of just using hotkey mapping, it was non-obvious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , they did fix the sound control from being directly tied to the scroll wheel .
There is now an option in the hotkey selection window to allow the scroll wheel to seek or be ignored and subsequently mapped to a hotkey .
I just noticed the setting this release .
Since it was a pulldown option instead of just using hotkey mapping , it was non-obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, they did fix the sound control from being directly tied to the scroll wheel.
There is now an option in the hotkey selection window to allow the scroll wheel to seek or be ignored and subsequently mapped to a hotkey.
I just noticed the setting this release.
Since it was a pulldown option instead of just using hotkey mapping, it was non-obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611429</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246994280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the release notes:</p><p>Changes between 0.9.9a and 1.0.0:</p><p>* Closed Captions using the SCTE-20 standard are now correctly decoded</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the release notes : Changes between 0.9.9a and 1.0.0 : * Closed Captions using the SCTE-20 standard are now correctly decoded</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the release notes:Changes between 0.9.9a and 1.0.0:* Closed Captions using the SCTE-20 standard are now correctly decoded</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617405</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there some reason why playing the DVD with English-language subtitles wouldn't work well enough compared to closed-captioning?<br>My university has a large deaf population; I see that shortcut taken fairly often to play a video in-class that doesn't have captioning, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there some reason why playing the DVD with English-language subtitles would n't work well enough compared to closed-captioning ? My university has a large deaf population ; I see that shortcut taken fairly often to play a video in-class that does n't have captioning , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there some reason why playing the DVD with English-language subtitles wouldn't work well enough compared to closed-captioning?My university has a large deaf population; I see that shortcut taken fairly often to play a video in-class that doesn't have captioning, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617621</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>Tacvek</author>
	<datestamp>1246986000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might be surprised. I who virtually never watch non-English programming, am a native English speaker, without any hearing impairment, often watch shows with subtitles on if they are available. It helps for those times when speach is slightly garbled, and you can't quite make out what was said.</p><p>Oddly enough though I've seen subtitles backfire on Content producers. On one television program being aired on a network site, Subtitles were provided. The dubtitles here were produced by the Closed-Captioners of the program, (as evidenced by the caption credit during the title sequence).</p><p>In one scene, I noticed two lines of caption that did not correspond the the audio. Upon replaying that scene, I discovered that the dialog was indeed spoken, but due to character positioning it was almost impposible to see. The dialog in question would also only confuse listeners, so at the last minute they apparently scrapped those lines by muting the speech tracks there. This was apparently after they had sent the copy to the captioners, so the result was that the cut dialog was revived by the captions.</p><p>I've also seen plenty of poorly done fan made subtitles, and occasionally even professionally produced captions with mistakes that were pretty bad. Bad enough that a single play-through would have caught them. My guess is that they forgot to note these particular issues on their test play-through, and do not have a policy of requiring one play-through with no spotted errors before releasing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might be surprised .
I who virtually never watch non-English programming , am a native English speaker , without any hearing impairment , often watch shows with subtitles on if they are available .
It helps for those times when speach is slightly garbled , and you ca n't quite make out what was said.Oddly enough though I 've seen subtitles backfire on Content producers .
On one television program being aired on a network site , Subtitles were provided .
The dubtitles here were produced by the Closed-Captioners of the program , ( as evidenced by the caption credit during the title sequence ) .In one scene , I noticed two lines of caption that did not correspond the the audio .
Upon replaying that scene , I discovered that the dialog was indeed spoken , but due to character positioning it was almost impposible to see .
The dialog in question would also only confuse listeners , so at the last minute they apparently scrapped those lines by muting the speech tracks there .
This was apparently after they had sent the copy to the captioners , so the result was that the cut dialog was revived by the captions.I 've also seen plenty of poorly done fan made subtitles , and occasionally even professionally produced captions with mistakes that were pretty bad .
Bad enough that a single play-through would have caught them .
My guess is that they forgot to note these particular issues on their test play-through , and do not have a policy of requiring one play-through with no spotted errors before releasing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might be surprised.
I who virtually never watch non-English programming, am a native English speaker, without any hearing impairment, often watch shows with subtitles on if they are available.
It helps for those times when speach is slightly garbled, and you can't quite make out what was said.Oddly enough though I've seen subtitles backfire on Content producers.
On one television program being aired on a network site, Subtitles were provided.
The dubtitles here were produced by the Closed-Captioners of the program, (as evidenced by the caption credit during the title sequence).In one scene, I noticed two lines of caption that did not correspond the the audio.
Upon replaying that scene, I discovered that the dialog was indeed spoken, but due to character positioning it was almost impposible to see.
The dialog in question would also only confuse listeners, so at the last minute they apparently scrapped those lines by muting the speech tracks there.
This was apparently after they had sent the copy to the captioners, so the result was that the cut dialog was revived by the captions.I've also seen plenty of poorly done fan made subtitles, and occasionally even professionally produced captions with mistakes that were pretty bad.
Bad enough that a single play-through would have caught them.
My guess is that they forgot to note these particular issues on their test play-through, and do not have a policy of requiring one play-through with no spotted errors before releasing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28742941</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>MontananIceMan</author>
	<datestamp>1247950320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Closed captions does work on this new version now. I worked with the VLC developers (Great guys) in the last couple months on getting this feature to work due to many misunderstanding between Subtitles and American Closed Captions. My friends and I have tested it in 1.0.0 and closed captions does work. Its under Subtitles &gt; Closed Caption 1, 2, 3, 4 not a seperate Closed Captions option.

Grab a movie that you know that has CC encoded in the video stream and try it out now. If you find movies that does not work in VLC with Closed Captions but you have tested on a regular DVD player or in a commerical verison, let me know the exact DVD info ASAP and I will pass it on to the VLC developers for more bug testing.

VLC thread is here.... you would have to be a registered user to see this thread though.
<a href="http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=57338" title="videolan.org" rel="nofollow">http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=57338</a> [videolan.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Closed captions does work on this new version now .
I worked with the VLC developers ( Great guys ) in the last couple months on getting this feature to work due to many misunderstanding between Subtitles and American Closed Captions .
My friends and I have tested it in 1.0.0 and closed captions does work .
Its under Subtitles &gt; Closed Caption 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 not a seperate Closed Captions option .
Grab a movie that you know that has CC encoded in the video stream and try it out now .
If you find movies that does not work in VLC with Closed Captions but you have tested on a regular DVD player or in a commerical verison , let me know the exact DVD info ASAP and I will pass it on to the VLC developers for more bug testing .
VLC thread is here.... you would have to be a registered user to see this thread though .
http : //forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php ? f = 7&amp;t = 57338 [ videolan.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Closed captions does work on this new version now.
I worked with the VLC developers (Great guys) in the last couple months on getting this feature to work due to many misunderstanding between Subtitles and American Closed Captions.
My friends and I have tested it in 1.0.0 and closed captions does work.
Its under Subtitles &gt; Closed Caption 1, 2, 3, 4 not a seperate Closed Captions option.
Grab a movie that you know that has CC encoded in the video stream and try it out now.
If you find movies that does not work in VLC with Closed Captions but you have tested on a regular DVD player or in a commerical verison, let me know the exact DVD info ASAP and I will pass it on to the VLC developers for more bug testing.
VLC thread is here.... you would have to be a registered user to see this thread though.
http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=57338 [videolan.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614925</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246964940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support. I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos. The old versions seem to be skipping to and from "keyframes" during seeking. It was very frustrating.</p></div><p>wow, it has frame-by-frame now?  that was always something that quicktime did better, and is very useful for seeing details in a video.</p><p>I don't think VLC was "skipping to keyframes" before - it had some sort of buffer where the decoder fills the buffer and the player plays it, and the player didn't have any concept of the length of a 'frame' in the decoder?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support .
I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos .
The old versions seem to be skipping to and from " keyframes " during seeking .
It was very frustrating.wow , it has frame-by-frame now ?
that was always something that quicktime did better , and is very useful for seeing details in a video.I do n't think VLC was " skipping to keyframes " before - it had some sort of buffer where the decoder fills the buffer and the player plays it , and the player did n't have any concept of the length of a 'frame ' in the decoder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support.
I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos.
The old versions seem to be skipping to and from "keyframes" during seeking.
It was very frustrating.wow, it has frame-by-frame now?
that was always something that quicktime did better, and is very useful for seeing details in a video.I don't think VLC was "skipping to keyframes" before - it had some sort of buffer where the decoder fills the buffer and the player plays it, and the player didn't have any concept of the length of a 'frame' in the decoder?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611075</id>
	<title>arc</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246992960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't paid the $99 yet, but the best video quality I have seen yet is ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 with the SimHD plugin.  That plugin uses NVidia GPUs and CUDA to upscale.  The quality is tremendous.  They have a demo (without sound) that's worth a look.  I haven't been able to reproduce that level of quality with mplayer/K-Lite codec packs/FFDShow tweaking to kingdom come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't paid the $ 99 yet , but the best video quality I have seen yet is ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 with the SimHD plugin .
That plugin uses NVidia GPUs and CUDA to upscale .
The quality is tremendous .
They have a demo ( without sound ) that 's worth a look .
I have n't been able to reproduce that level of quality with mplayer/K-Lite codec packs/FFDShow tweaking to kingdom come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't paid the $99 yet, but the best video quality I have seen yet is ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 with the SimHD plugin.
That plugin uses NVidia GPUs and CUDA to upscale.
The quality is tremendous.
They have a demo (without sound) that's worth a look.
I haven't been able to reproduce that level of quality with mplayer/K-Lite codec packs/FFDShow tweaking to kingdom come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615729</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246969800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC plays files inside multi-volume RARs,  in this release, but uncompressed ones, because of licenses issues of libunrar.</p><p>Moreover, there are a few plugins around to deal with compressed ones.</p><p>Finally, being very close to the developer community, your "compromises the integrity of VLC" statement is complete FUD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC plays files inside multi-volume RARs , in this release , but uncompressed ones , because of licenses issues of libunrar.Moreover , there are a few plugins around to deal with compressed ones.Finally , being very close to the developer community , your " compromises the integrity of VLC " statement is complete FUD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC plays files inside multi-volume RARs,  in this release, but uncompressed ones, because of licenses issues of libunrar.Moreover, there are a few plugins around to deal with compressed ones.Finally, being very close to the developer community, your "compromises the integrity of VLC" statement is complete FUD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>qoncept</author>
	<datestamp>1246981800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sigh? As in, you don't like that? What's wrong with "If it doesn't do what I want, I'm not using it." Sounds pretty reasonable to me. It's why I gave up on my Linux expirament (along with "If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass, I'm not using it.")</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sigh ?
As in , you do n't like that ?
What 's wrong with " If it does n't do what I want , I 'm not using it .
" Sounds pretty reasonable to me .
It 's why I gave up on my Linux expirament ( along with " If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass , I 'm not using it .
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sigh?
As in, you don't like that?
What's wrong with "If it doesn't do what I want, I'm not using it.
" Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
It's why I gave up on my Linux expirament (along with "If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass, I'm not using it.
")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1246984620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sigh, because I'd like it to work for them so I don't have to keep trying to fix their Windows machines that *do* play DVD's and also get filled with viruses and horribleness.<br>
That doesn't do what they want, either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sigh , because I 'd like it to work for them so I do n't have to keep trying to fix their Windows machines that * do * play DVD 's and also get filled with viruses and horribleness .
That does n't do what they want , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sigh, because I'd like it to work for them so I don't have to keep trying to fix their Windows machines that *do* play DVD's and also get filled with viruses and horribleness.
That doesn't do what they want, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608357</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>CRiMSON</author>
	<datestamp>1246982340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fanboi</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fanboi</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fanboi</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607851</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1246980360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess they should include all kinds of useless bloat until the download is 200MB and takes 5 minutes to startup. Software that does only one thing, and does it well, oh the horror!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they should include all kinds of useless bloat until the download is 200MB and takes 5 minutes to startup .
Software that does only one thing , and does it well , oh the horror !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they should include all kinds of useless bloat until the download is 200MB and takes 5 minutes to startup.
Software that does only one thing, and does it well, oh the horror!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610849</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1246992120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I looked in the program, and tried finding it on the home page, but I don't get how you're supposed to skip forward/backwards frame-by-frame?</p><p>The menus don't seem to contain the option, and I've guessed some shortcut keys with no luck... Hmm...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I looked in the program , and tried finding it on the home page , but I do n't get how you 're supposed to skip forward/backwards frame-by-frame ? The menus do n't seem to contain the option , and I 've guessed some shortcut keys with no luck... Hmm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I looked in the program, and tried finding it on the home page, but I don't get how you're supposed to skip forward/backwards frame-by-frame?The menus don't seem to contain the option, and I've guessed some shortcut keys with no luck... Hmm...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608969</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1246984740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>VLC "just works" when you throw video files at it.  Where am I, a novice, supposed to find a "community made codec pack"?  I barely know what a codec is, and moreover I don't care.  And having downloaded one, which one's the best?  I swear, it's like wanting to buy a shirt, and then having to spend time researching stitch counts and whether the garment was dyed after assembly or the fabric was dyed before stitching.  As for subtitled movies, nobody watches them.  If you're Wapanese then go to hell, otherwise use a different player for your foreign movies.  Actually with most of the foreign movies I watch, the issue is how to turn the subtitles <b>off</b>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC " just works " when you throw video files at it .
Where am I , a novice , supposed to find a " community made codec pack " ?
I barely know what a codec is , and moreover I do n't care .
And having downloaded one , which one 's the best ?
I swear , it 's like wanting to buy a shirt , and then having to spend time researching stitch counts and whether the garment was dyed after assembly or the fabric was dyed before stitching .
As for subtitled movies , nobody watches them .
If you 're Wapanese then go to hell , otherwise use a different player for your foreign movies .
Actually with most of the foreign movies I watch , the issue is how to turn the subtitles off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC "just works" when you throw video files at it.
Where am I, a novice, supposed to find a "community made codec pack"?
I barely know what a codec is, and moreover I don't care.
And having downloaded one, which one's the best?
I swear, it's like wanting to buy a shirt, and then having to spend time researching stitch counts and whether the garment was dyed after assembly or the fabric was dyed before stitching.
As for subtitled movies, nobody watches them.
If you're Wapanese then go to hell, otherwise use a different player for your foreign movies.
Actually with most of the foreign movies I watch, the issue is how to turn the subtitles off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608491</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity! That's such a herculean task, what more could you ask from it!?"</p><p>So does zoom player... Every version since 5 goes through &amp; fixes all your codecs as part of the install process. And on top of that it has the best UI ive ever seen on a video player. It is so incredibly configurable and versatile I always feel like im tying my shoes while wearing mittens when i try to use VLC</p><p>Unfortunately zoom player isnt available for linux, its pretty much my killer app at this point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity !
That 's such a herculean task , what more could you ask from it ! ?
" So does zoom player... Every version since 5 goes through &amp; fixes all your codecs as part of the install process .
And on top of that it has the best UI ive ever seen on a video player .
It is so incredibly configurable and versatile I always feel like im tying my shoes while wearing mittens when i try to use VLCUnfortunately zoom player isnt available for linux , its pretty much my killer app at this point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity!
That's such a herculean task, what more could you ask from it!?
"So does zoom player... Every version since 5 goes through &amp; fixes all your codecs as part of the install process.
And on top of that it has the best UI ive ever seen on a video player.
It is so incredibly configurable and versatile I always feel like im tying my shoes while wearing mittens when i try to use VLCUnfortunately zoom player isnt available for linux, its pretty much my killer app at this point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607965</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1246980780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and you'd be joining the other person who paid royalties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and you 'd be joining the other person who paid royalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and you'd be joining the other person who paid royalties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607875</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pretty sure that was janet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pretty sure that was janet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pretty sure that was janet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608877</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1246984320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Subbing bugs aside, I keep VLC handy as it will play ANYTHING.  Files in obscure codecs that media player classic fails on.  Even files that my codec identifier gives up on, though media player classic HC is still my choice for day-to-day use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Subbing bugs aside , I keep VLC handy as it will play ANYTHING .
Files in obscure codecs that media player classic fails on .
Even files that my codec identifier gives up on , though media player classic HC is still my choice for day-to-day use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Subbing bugs aside, I keep VLC handy as it will play ANYTHING.
Files in obscure codecs that media player classic fails on.
Even files that my codec identifier gives up on, though media player classic HC is still my choice for day-to-day use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608807</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.</p><p>Still, it's a great do it all player / streamer</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, that's one reason why I use VLC - because I know it's not going to use any accelleration except minor ones that don't affect much (e.g., DirectX video surfaces). It's important when you remove the DRM that you actually removed the DRM, and sometimes testing it with Windows Media Player doesn't help (you can check through the properties, but I'd like to be sure). With VLC not using the OS components, I know if it plays there, there isn't any DRM on it.</p><p>Of course, having the option to use hardware accelleration, or disabling it, is better...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback , I 'm not going back to VLC.Still , it 's a great do it all player / streamerActually , that 's one reason why I use VLC - because I know it 's not going to use any accelleration except minor ones that do n't affect much ( e.g. , DirectX video surfaces ) .
It 's important when you remove the DRM that you actually removed the DRM , and sometimes testing it with Windows Media Player does n't help ( you can check through the properties , but I 'd like to be sure ) .
With VLC not using the OS components , I know if it plays there , there is n't any DRM on it.Of course , having the option to use hardware accelleration , or disabling it , is better.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.Still, it's a great do it all player / streamerActually, that's one reason why I use VLC - because I know it's not going to use any accelleration except minor ones that don't affect much (e.g., DirectX video surfaces).
It's important when you remove the DRM that you actually removed the DRM, and sometimes testing it with Windows Media Player doesn't help (you can check through the properties, but I'd like to be sure).
With VLC not using the OS components, I know if it plays there, there isn't any DRM on it.Of course, having the option to use hardware accelleration, or disabling it, is better...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610699</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Mulder3</author>
	<datestamp>1246991580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We use Teletext Subtitles</htmltext>
<tokenext>We use Teletext Subtitles</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We use Teletext Subtitles</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611531</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246994700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stardust DVD (european) works fine on my VLC. It's my default DVD viewer, and I haven't had it choke on a DVD these last few years...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stardust DVD ( european ) works fine on my VLC .
It 's my default DVD viewer , and I have n't had it choke on a DVD these last few years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stardust DVD (european) works fine on my VLC.
It's my default DVD viewer, and I haven't had it choke on a DVD these last few years...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610295</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>MostAwesomeDude</author>
	<datestamp>1246990080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AMD won't be releasing XvBA to the general public. Just wait for Gallium VDPAU. Or write it yourself. We've got all the docs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AMD wo n't be releasing XvBA to the general public .
Just wait for Gallium VDPAU .
Or write it yourself .
We 've got all the docs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AMD won't be releasing XvBA to the general public.
Just wait for Gallium VDPAU.
Or write it yourself.
We've got all the docs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609053</id>
	<title>Actually, no</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1246985100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In all seriousness, I just tried it out and, despite its claims to the contrary, it does still "jumps" around when you try to advance the time slider and the full-screen pop-up interface, while improved over some awful early versions, is still annoying (it pops up at any mouse movement, not just when the mouse is at the bottom of the screen). I'll stick to the FAR superior <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOM\_Player" title="wikipedia.org">GOM</a> [wikipedia.org] thank you very much. If only GOM had a Linux version, it would be the perfect media player (with the best and most feature-filled user interface I've ever seen).</htmltext>
<tokenext>In all seriousness , I just tried it out and , despite its claims to the contrary , it does still " jumps " around when you try to advance the time slider and the full-screen pop-up interface , while improved over some awful early versions , is still annoying ( it pops up at any mouse movement , not just when the mouse is at the bottom of the screen ) .
I 'll stick to the FAR superior GOM [ wikipedia.org ] thank you very much .
If only GOM had a Linux version , it would be the perfect media player ( with the best and most feature-filled user interface I 've ever seen ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all seriousness, I just tried it out and, despite its claims to the contrary, it does still "jumps" around when you try to advance the time slider and the full-screen pop-up interface, while improved over some awful early versions, is still annoying (it pops up at any mouse movement, not just when the mouse is at the bottom of the screen).
I'll stick to the FAR superior GOM [wikipedia.org] thank you very much.
If only GOM had a Linux version, it would be the perfect media player (with the best and most feature-filled user interface I've ever seen).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608639</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246983360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't think anything plays h246 files - try h264<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't think anything plays h246 files - try h264 : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't think anything plays h246 files - try h264 :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the Fuck would anyone still be using Tiger?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the Fuck would anyone still be using Tiger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the Fuck would anyone still be using Tiger?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610879</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1246992240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had VLC crash several times and lag absolutely horribly trying to play 1080p video. Very unintuitive GUI and useles help file. With so much bloat you'd think they could put in a decent fucking MANUAL instead of the crap 'help' section they do provide.</p><p>Moved to Zoom Player and haven't had any problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had VLC crash several times and lag absolutely horribly trying to play 1080p video .
Very unintuitive GUI and useles help file .
With so much bloat you 'd think they could put in a decent fucking MANUAL instead of the crap 'help ' section they do provide.Moved to Zoom Player and have n't had any problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had VLC crash several times and lag absolutely horribly trying to play 1080p video.
Very unintuitive GUI and useles help file.
With so much bloat you'd think they could put in a decent fucking MANUAL instead of the crap 'help' section they do provide.Moved to Zoom Player and haven't had any problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609229</id>
	<title>But....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will it blend?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will it blend?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619045</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>DoctorLard</author>
	<datestamp>1247045160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try this:
rar x myretardedrarfile.rar</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try this : rar x myretardedrarfile.rar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try this:
rar x myretardedrarfile.rar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610551</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Cormacus</author>
	<datestamp>1246991040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>just out of curiosity, how old is the DVD player itself (the hardware)?  I had trouble recently with a slightly older DVD drive when trying to play newer DVDs.  Put in a new DVD drive that I had lying around and VLC didn't crash anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>just out of curiosity , how old is the DVD player itself ( the hardware ) ?
I had trouble recently with a slightly older DVD drive when trying to play newer DVDs .
Put in a new DVD drive that I had lying around and VLC did n't crash anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just out of curiosity, how old is the DVD player itself (the hardware)?
I had trouble recently with a slightly older DVD drive when trying to play newer DVDs.
Put in a new DVD drive that I had lying around and VLC didn't crash anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611111</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246993140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it works just fine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it works just fine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it works just fine?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611701</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. I do not know ONE single GUI app under Linux, that adheres to that UNIX philosophy.</p><p>If it would, there would be a executable for every button in the UI. and you could use apps like tools or like wizards, to work on your file (which could also be an executable or any other file system object).</p><p>The Linux GUIs are just bad clones of Windows/Mac/etc. And in my eyes this is no advantage but a complete failure.</p><p>My only hope is the new KDE4 philosophy. It at least is a little step in the right direction. Although they got infected with the Gnome misunderstanding, where you think that simplicity would be equal to efficiency, even when it is the opposite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I do not know ONE single GUI app under Linux , that adheres to that UNIX philosophy.If it would , there would be a executable for every button in the UI .
and you could use apps like tools or like wizards , to work on your file ( which could also be an executable or any other file system object ) .The Linux GUIs are just bad clones of Windows/Mac/etc .
And in my eyes this is no advantage but a complete failure.My only hope is the new KDE4 philosophy .
It at least is a little step in the right direction .
Although they got infected with the Gnome misunderstanding , where you think that simplicity would be equal to efficiency , even when it is the opposite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I do not know ONE single GUI app under Linux, that adheres to that UNIX philosophy.If it would, there would be a executable for every button in the UI.
and you could use apps like tools or like wizards, to work on your file (which could also be an executable or any other file system object).The Linux GUIs are just bad clones of Windows/Mac/etc.
And in my eyes this is no advantage but a complete failure.My only hope is the new KDE4 philosophy.
It at least is a little step in the right direction.
Although they got infected with the Gnome misunderstanding, where you think that simplicity would be equal to efficiency, even when it is the opposite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611565</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246994820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, how many people need them anyway? I guess that group is too small to have any relevance. But hey, you can always add the feature yourself!.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , how many people need them anyway ?
I guess that group is too small to have any relevance .
But hey , you can always add the feature yourself ! .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, how many people need them anyway?
I guess that group is too small to have any relevance.
But hey, you can always add the feature yourself!.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A friend's boss actually said that to her after she worked so much over time for 2 months to get a major project in that she got sick.</p><p>"So... what have you done for me lately?"</p><p>---</p><p>With regard to your comment tho-- I don't suppose you never heard of the phrase, "Jack of All Trades, Master of None".</p><p>I use VLC-- because it's awesome and focused.</p><p>I used to use WinAMP but it became very difuse (and confusing).</p><p>I sincerely hope when they "finish" VLC that they will *STOP* instead of continuing onward and making a bloated mess of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A friend 's boss actually said that to her after she worked so much over time for 2 months to get a major project in that she got sick. " So.. .
what have you done for me lately ?
" ---With regard to your comment tho-- I do n't suppose you never heard of the phrase , " Jack of All Trades , Master of None " .I use VLC-- because it 's awesome and focused.I used to use WinAMP but it became very difuse ( and confusing ) .I sincerely hope when they " finish " VLC that they will * STOP * instead of continuing onward and making a bloated mess of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A friend's boss actually said that to her after she worked so much over time for 2 months to get a major project in that she got sick."So...
what have you done for me lately?
"---With regard to your comment tho-- I don't suppose you never heard of the phrase, "Jack of All Trades, Master of None".I use VLC-- because it's awesome and focused.I used to use WinAMP but it became very difuse (and confusing).I sincerely hope when they "finish" VLC that they will *STOP* instead of continuing onward and making a bloated mess of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</id>
	<title>Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any remaining Tiger users needn't bother. As of this version, VLC requires Mac OS X 10.5. This is not obvious from the website.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any remaining Tiger users need n't bother .
As of this version , VLC requires Mac OS X 10.5 .
This is not obvious from the website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any remaining Tiger users needn't bother.
As of this version, VLC requires Mac OS X 10.5.
This is not obvious from the website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610381</id>
	<title>Re:Does it now play DVDs with "piracy" warnings?</title>
	<author>mehrotra.akash</author>
	<datestamp>1246990440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1- obvious solution is to pirate it so that you dont have to see the anti piracy warning, the warning is like being exempted from anti drug seminars if you buy drugs<br>2- simply going to video\_ts folder in the dvd and selecting the biggest file works for me(i dont want to see ad's when i buy a DVD at full rate, give it for free and i will see them)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1- obvious solution is to pirate it so that you dont have to see the anti piracy warning , the warning is like being exempted from anti drug seminars if you buy drugs2- simply going to video \ _ts folder in the dvd and selecting the biggest file works for me ( i dont want to see ad 's when i buy a DVD at full rate , give it for free and i will see them )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1- obvious solution is to pirate it so that you dont have to see the anti piracy warning, the warning is like being exempted from anti drug seminars if you buy drugs2- simply going to video\_ts folder in the dvd and selecting the biggest file works for me(i dont want to see ad's when i buy a DVD at full rate, give it for free and i will see them)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608463</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video, and vice-versa. I've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type.</i> <br>
<br>
Zoom Player can be set up to do this. Of course it's Windows only.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video , and vice-versa .
I 've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type .
Zoom Player can be set up to do this .
Of course it 's Windows only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video, and vice-versa.
I've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type.
Zoom Player can be set up to do this.
Of course it's Windows only.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609385</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Man Eating Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1246986300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer couldn't.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>I'll second this - I've never tried a DVD in Xine that didn't play perfectly, and it'll let you skip the trailers and other junk. I use VLC and mplayer for files, but don't even bother with them for DVDs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer could n't .
I 'll second this - I 've never tried a DVD in Xine that did n't play perfectly , and it 'll let you skip the trailers and other junk .
I use VLC and mplayer for files , but do n't even bother with them for DVDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Xine has played all the discs that VLC and MPlayer couldn't.
I'll second this - I've never tried a DVD in Xine that didn't play perfectly, and it'll let you skip the trailers and other junk.
I use VLC and mplayer for files, but don't even bother with them for DVDs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607847</id>
	<title>No longer in beta?</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1246980300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So much for being acquired by Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So much for being acquired by Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So much for being acquired by Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612907</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1247000040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because that's what the computer I use at work has on it? Because I've got everything set just the way I like it in 10.4? Because 10.5 doesn't work reliably with the 802.1x VPN we have at my night job? Because my sub-800 MHz Macs are still chugging along nicely, thankyouverymuch? Don't get me wrong, I like 10.5 just fine, but between home and my two jobs I own or use seven Macs, and about half are still on 10.4, and will stay there for quite a while.</p><p>10.4 is my least favorite OS X of the last several years. I hate spotlight and there's nothing in 10.4 that I prefer over 10.3. (Other than some better stability and networking improvements.) I liked the old 'find' a million times more for many reasons. 10.5 has some changes that I hate (the Dock and sidebar) but Time Machine is the best thing ever and Quick Look has turned out to be surprisingly useful. If I could run 10.3 plus Time Machine and Quick Look on an Intel Mac I'd use that forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because that 's what the computer I use at work has on it ?
Because I 've got everything set just the way I like it in 10.4 ?
Because 10.5 does n't work reliably with the 802.1x VPN we have at my night job ?
Because my sub-800 MHz Macs are still chugging along nicely , thankyouverymuch ?
Do n't get me wrong , I like 10.5 just fine , but between home and my two jobs I own or use seven Macs , and about half are still on 10.4 , and will stay there for quite a while.10.4 is my least favorite OS X of the last several years .
I hate spotlight and there 's nothing in 10.4 that I prefer over 10.3 .
( Other than some better stability and networking improvements .
) I liked the old 'find ' a million times more for many reasons .
10.5 has some changes that I hate ( the Dock and sidebar ) but Time Machine is the best thing ever and Quick Look has turned out to be surprisingly useful .
If I could run 10.3 plus Time Machine and Quick Look on an Intel Mac I 'd use that forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because that's what the computer I use at work has on it?
Because I've got everything set just the way I like it in 10.4?
Because 10.5 doesn't work reliably with the 802.1x VPN we have at my night job?
Because my sub-800 MHz Macs are still chugging along nicely, thankyouverymuch?
Don't get me wrong, I like 10.5 just fine, but between home and my two jobs I own or use seven Macs, and about half are still on 10.4, and will stay there for quite a while.10.4 is my least favorite OS X of the last several years.
I hate spotlight and there's nothing in 10.4 that I prefer over 10.3.
(Other than some better stability and networking improvements.
) I liked the old 'find' a million times more for many reasons.
10.5 has some changes that I hate (the Dock and sidebar) but Time Machine is the best thing ever and Quick Look has turned out to be surprisingly useful.
If I could run 10.3 plus Time Machine and Quick Look on an Intel Mac I'd use that forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's broken about it? I'm using 0.9.9 now (or whatever the last release was), and I don't have any issues with the volume control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's broken about it ?
I 'm using 0.9.9 now ( or whatever the last release was ) , and I do n't have any issues with the volume control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's broken about it?
I'm using 0.9.9 now (or whatever the last release was), and I don't have any issues with the volume control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</id>
	<title>Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1246979820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has anyone fixed the volume control yet, or is that too trivial to bother with?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone fixed the volume control yet , or is that too trivial to bother with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone fixed the volume control yet, or is that too trivial to bother with?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</id>
	<title>cutting edge</title>
	<author>wondersparrow</author>
	<datestamp>1246982820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oooh, another cutting edge video player that likely wont be able to play a 2 year old 1080p h246 file I have on my 6 month old quad core.  I could be wrong, but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oooh , another cutting edge video player that likely wont be able to play a 2 year old 1080p h246 file I have on my 6 month old quad core .
I could be wrong , but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oooh, another cutting edge video player that likely wont be able to play a 2 year old 1080p h246 file I have on my 6 month old quad core.
I could be wrong, but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609101</id>
	<title>Looking forward to v2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe in version 2.0 they manage to fix the UI. A media player should play/pause when you click on the picture, it should use the plain arrow keys for seeking, and the filename shouldn't overlay the subtitles in the first seconds. And what does 200\% volume even mean? Will it pop my speakers?</p><p>It's the old FLOSS disease: disdain for usability. In a media player, that's fatal.</p><p>Gripes about the installer:<br>* VLC 0.9.9 on Windows XP doesn't see the update, even if you tell it to search<br>* it wants to set VLC as the default player for ALL audio and video formats and disc drives, regardless of former settings<br>* ActiveX plugin is checked by default, regardless of former setting. I don't know if the browser plugin is still so crash-happy but I'm definitely not going to use it in IE. Video plugins for browsers will hopefully soon be a thing of the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe in version 2.0 they manage to fix the UI .
A media player should play/pause when you click on the picture , it should use the plain arrow keys for seeking , and the filename should n't overlay the subtitles in the first seconds .
And what does 200 \ % volume even mean ?
Will it pop my speakers ? It 's the old FLOSS disease : disdain for usability .
In a media player , that 's fatal.Gripes about the installer : * VLC 0.9.9 on Windows XP does n't see the update , even if you tell it to search * it wants to set VLC as the default player for ALL audio and video formats and disc drives , regardless of former settings * ActiveX plugin is checked by default , regardless of former setting .
I do n't know if the browser plugin is still so crash-happy but I 'm definitely not going to use it in IE .
Video plugins for browsers will hopefully soon be a thing of the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe in version 2.0 they manage to fix the UI.
A media player should play/pause when you click on the picture, it should use the plain arrow keys for seeking, and the filename shouldn't overlay the subtitles in the first seconds.
And what does 200\% volume even mean?
Will it pop my speakers?It's the old FLOSS disease: disdain for usability.
In a media player, that's fatal.Gripes about the installer:* VLC 0.9.9 on Windows XP doesn't see the update, even if you tell it to search* it wants to set VLC as the default player for ALL audio and video formats and disc drives, regardless of former settings* ActiveX plugin is checked by default, regardless of former setting.
I don't know if the browser plugin is still so crash-happy but I'm definitely not going to use it in IE.
Video plugins for browsers will hopefully soon be a thing of the past.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615139</id>
	<title>Has anyone fixed Pulseaudio?</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1246966020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pulseaudio = Pain in the ass hate machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pulseaudio = Pain in the ass hate machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pulseaudio = Pain in the ass hate machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608821</id>
	<title>Fedora 9?</title>
	<author>PadRacerExtreme</author>
	<datestamp>1246984140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone know how to install on Fedora 9?  If you find the install instructions (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-fedora.html), I try to install the rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm and it says I need a Fedora 10 machine.
<p>
rpm -ivh <a href="http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm" title="rpmfusion.org" rel="nofollow">http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm</a> [rpmfusion.org]
</p><p>
Retrieving <a href="http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm" title="rpmfusion.org" rel="nofollow">http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm</a> [rpmfusion.org]
</p><p>
warning:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/var/tmp/rpm-xfer.hIiu76: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 49c8885a
</p><p>
error: Failed dependencies:
</p><p>
        system-release &gt;= 10 is needed by rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch
</p><p>

I am sure I am missing something obvious....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know how to install on Fedora 9 ?
If you find the install instructions ( http : //www.videolan.org/vlc/download-fedora.html ) , I try to install the rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm and it says I need a Fedora 10 machine .
rpm -ivh http : //download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm [ rpmfusion.org ] Retrieving http : //download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm [ rpmfusion.org ] warning : /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.hIiu76 : Header V3 DSA signature : NOKEY , key ID 49c8885a error : Failed dependencies : system-release &gt; = 10 is needed by rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch I am sure I am missing something obvious... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know how to install on Fedora 9?
If you find the install instructions (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-fedora.html), I try to install the rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm and it says I need a Fedora 10 machine.
rpm -ivh http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm [rpmfusion.org]

Retrieving http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm [rpmfusion.org]

warning: /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.hIiu76: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 49c8885a

error: Failed dependencies:

        system-release &gt;= 10 is needed by rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch


I am sure I am missing something obvious....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617033</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1246980720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.</p></div><p>That's a false dichotomy. There's no law that something that only does one thing has to suck at it, or that something that does more than one thing can't be good at all of them. What about a tool that excels at a dozen things versus one that sucks at the only thing it does? Which tool would you use?</p><p>Anyway, back to VLC. I would not say it excels as a media playback interface. It's quite clunky and ordinary as far as user interaction goes. What it does do well is handle a lot of different formats. It would be nice if it did that <em>and</em> was pleasant to use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have a dozen tools , each of which excells at it 's one thing , than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.That 's a false dichotomy .
There 's no law that something that only does one thing has to suck at it , or that something that does more than one thing ca n't be good at all of them .
What about a tool that excels at a dozen things versus one that sucks at the only thing it does ?
Which tool would you use ? Anyway , back to VLC .
I would not say it excels as a media playback interface .
It 's quite clunky and ordinary as far as user interaction goes .
What it does do well is handle a lot of different formats .
It would be nice if it did that and was pleasant to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.That's a false dichotomy.
There's no law that something that only does one thing has to suck at it, or that something that does more than one thing can't be good at all of them.
What about a tool that excels at a dozen things versus one that sucks at the only thing it does?
Which tool would you use?Anyway, back to VLC.
I would not say it excels as a media playback interface.
It's quite clunky and ordinary as far as user interaction goes.
What it does do well is handle a lot of different formats.
It would be nice if it did that and was pleasant to use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609643</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246987320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have recently rented a couple of DVDs with that kind of behaviour.  If you go to the Playback menu, select Title and then select DVD Menu, it usually jumps straight to the menu, bypassing the trailers and so forth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have recently rented a couple of DVDs with that kind of behaviour .
If you go to the Playback menu , select Title and then select DVD Menu , it usually jumps straight to the menu , bypassing the trailers and so forth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have recently rented a couple of DVDs with that kind of behaviour.
If you go to the Playback menu, select Title and then select DVD Menu, it usually jumps straight to the menu, bypassing the trailers and so forth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610435</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.ASS support is extremely lacklustre, and MKV ordered chapters and variable frame rate has plenty of bugs still left in.</p><p>VLC isn't done until the Hitsuji Haruhi (reference<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.MKV) release plays perfectly. And so far, that's only in CCCP latest beta under Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
.ASS support is extremely lacklustre , and MKV ordered chapters and variable frame rate has plenty of bugs still left in.VLC is n't done until the Hitsuji Haruhi ( reference .MKV ) release plays perfectly .
And so far , that 's only in CCCP latest beta under Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
.ASS support is extremely lacklustre, and MKV ordered chapters and variable frame rate has plenty of bugs still left in.VLC isn't done until the Hitsuji Haruhi (reference .MKV) release plays perfectly.
And so far, that's only in CCCP latest beta under Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608845</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>AikonMGB</author>
	<datestamp>1246984200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you have a link to a well-written guide on setting this up? I've been trying to test it out on my laptop (which research tells me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/can/ run VDPAU), but I'm a Linux user, not a developer, and I keep getting lost and giving up before I reach the destination =(</p><p>Aikon-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you have a link to a well-written guide on setting this up ?
I 've been trying to test it out on my laptop ( which research tells me /can/ run VDPAU ) , but I 'm a Linux user , not a developer , and I keep getting lost and giving up before I reach the destination = ( Aikon-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you have a link to a well-written guide on setting this up?
I've been trying to test it out on my laptop (which research tells me /can/ run VDPAU), but I'm a Linux user, not a developer, and I keep getting lost and giving up before I reach the destination =(Aikon-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28629581</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>NitroWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1247054100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am going to address the salient points in one post, instead of responding individually, since most of the responses are from clueless people - it's kind of pointless to engage in direct conversation with people so out of touch from reality.</p><p>1. As has already been explained, at least in minor detail, is that multi-part RARs are for media distributed over the internet.  Pirated, not pirated<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it doesn't matter.  The fact is that the media is there, it's popular and it's not going away.  The file size limit of the distribution mechanism that shall not be named (according to rule #1) prevents large media files from being posted.  So yes, it's partly a file size issue, see number 2.</p><p>2.  BitTorrent is not the only distribution mechanism, nor is it the most efficient in many instances.  However, even IF you are using BitTorrent, having multi-part RARs is extremely handy when only ONE or FEW of the RARs are corrupted - you only have to download a small chunk of data, perhaps from another provider, to complete the media in question.  If it's distributed as a monolithic file, you have to then download another 12 GB (or more!) to get the complete file.  So yes, it still serves a purpose, even with BT.  See #3</p><p>3.  I think multi-part RARs are fucking annoying as hell and I wish they would go away, even with their benefits.  I am willing to download another 4, 8, 12 GB on the rare occasions I get corrupted files if it means getting rid of the fucking RARs.  However, I accept the fact that RARs are here and they are here to stay for the immediate future<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... therefore I work with them and do not cover my hears and shout that multi-part RARs don't exist and hope they go away.  They won't.  They are here, we have to deal with it.</p><p>4.  Yes, several media players exist that play multi-part RARs just fine.  Personally, I use XBMC - it is FAR, FAR, FAR away superior to VLC when it comes to playing media of any kind.  It plays everything I've ever seen - There is no other media player on the face of the planet, except mPlayer (which is what XBMC uses) that is as versatile and complete as XBMC. VLC is a joke compared to the formats mPlayer/XBMC plays out of the box.</p><p>5.  Now this point always gets peoples feathers ruffled, and I always get a good laugh out of it, because it's so easy to test yourself... but no one bothers to do it.  I have bothered to do it, a number of times, just to be sure I'm not smoking crack:  A RAR'd media file is smaller than the original.  Yes, you read that right and yes, it goes against conventional wisdom, but the fact remains that a typical 60 minute show, weighing in at around 350 MB in size (SD) will be about 20 MB (give or take 10 MB or so) smaller in multi-part RAR's than when it's unrar'd, depending on your CODEC.  While 20MB in savings in this day and age of 2 TB drives seems like a drop in the bucket (and in fact is a drop in the bucket), if you measure that 20 MB out over thousands of files, it becomes a more significant number.  Is it worth RARing all your media?  Probably not - but since the media already comes that way, why unrar it to play it and incur the small but measurable space penalty in addition to using up time and CPU cycles for absolutely no gain at all?</p><p>6.  One poster seems to misunderstand what a serious media center is.  It's not uncompressed video; It is a media center than can play back anything you throw at it.  VLC is not it (or at least hasn't been it up until now?).  XBMC, however, is.  Either way, my point is (and this addresses the AC comment who is supposedly "close to the dev community," lol - whatever that means.)  I offered to submit a patch to VLC upwards of 2 years ago that was rejected because they disagreed with the fact that VLC should not play files in such a format.  I happily went on my way and used other media players.  I've never said it wasn't VLC developers perogative to not include that functionality - because it most certainly is... but the fact that they abjectly refuse to accept the fact</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am going to address the salient points in one post , instead of responding individually , since most of the responses are from clueless people - it 's kind of pointless to engage in direct conversation with people so out of touch from reality.1 .
As has already been explained , at least in minor detail , is that multi-part RARs are for media distributed over the internet .
Pirated , not pirated ... it does n't matter .
The fact is that the media is there , it 's popular and it 's not going away .
The file size limit of the distribution mechanism that shall not be named ( according to rule # 1 ) prevents large media files from being posted .
So yes , it 's partly a file size issue , see number 2.2 .
BitTorrent is not the only distribution mechanism , nor is it the most efficient in many instances .
However , even IF you are using BitTorrent , having multi-part RARs is extremely handy when only ONE or FEW of the RARs are corrupted - you only have to download a small chunk of data , perhaps from another provider , to complete the media in question .
If it 's distributed as a monolithic file , you have to then download another 12 GB ( or more !
) to get the complete file .
So yes , it still serves a purpose , even with BT .
See # 33 .
I think multi-part RARs are fucking annoying as hell and I wish they would go away , even with their benefits .
I am willing to download another 4 , 8 , 12 GB on the rare occasions I get corrupted files if it means getting rid of the fucking RARs .
However , I accept the fact that RARs are here and they are here to stay for the immediate future ... therefore I work with them and do not cover my hears and shout that multi-part RARs do n't exist and hope they go away .
They wo n't .
They are here , we have to deal with it.4 .
Yes , several media players exist that play multi-part RARs just fine .
Personally , I use XBMC - it is FAR , FAR , FAR away superior to VLC when it comes to playing media of any kind .
It plays everything I 've ever seen - There is no other media player on the face of the planet , except mPlayer ( which is what XBMC uses ) that is as versatile and complete as XBMC .
VLC is a joke compared to the formats mPlayer/XBMC plays out of the box.5 .
Now this point always gets peoples feathers ruffled , and I always get a good laugh out of it , because it 's so easy to test yourself... but no one bothers to do it .
I have bothered to do it , a number of times , just to be sure I 'm not smoking crack : A RAR 'd media file is smaller than the original .
Yes , you read that right and yes , it goes against conventional wisdom , but the fact remains that a typical 60 minute show , weighing in at around 350 MB in size ( SD ) will be about 20 MB ( give or take 10 MB or so ) smaller in multi-part RAR 's than when it 's unrar 'd , depending on your CODEC .
While 20MB in savings in this day and age of 2 TB drives seems like a drop in the bucket ( and in fact is a drop in the bucket ) , if you measure that 20 MB out over thousands of files , it becomes a more significant number .
Is it worth RARing all your media ?
Probably not - but since the media already comes that way , why unrar it to play it and incur the small but measurable space penalty in addition to using up time and CPU cycles for absolutely no gain at all ? 6 .
One poster seems to misunderstand what a serious media center is .
It 's not uncompressed video ; It is a media center than can play back anything you throw at it .
VLC is not it ( or at least has n't been it up until now ? ) .
XBMC , however , is .
Either way , my point is ( and this addresses the AC comment who is supposedly " close to the dev community , " lol - whatever that means .
) I offered to submit a patch to VLC upwards of 2 years ago that was rejected because they disagreed with the fact that VLC should not play files in such a format .
I happily went on my way and used other media players .
I 've never said it was n't VLC developers perogative to not include that functionality - because it most certainly is... but the fact that they abjectly refuse to accept the fact</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am going to address the salient points in one post, instead of responding individually, since most of the responses are from clueless people - it's kind of pointless to engage in direct conversation with people so out of touch from reality.1.
As has already been explained, at least in minor detail, is that multi-part RARs are for media distributed over the internet.
Pirated, not pirated ... it doesn't matter.
The fact is that the media is there, it's popular and it's not going away.
The file size limit of the distribution mechanism that shall not be named (according to rule #1) prevents large media files from being posted.
So yes, it's partly a file size issue, see number 2.2.
BitTorrent is not the only distribution mechanism, nor is it the most efficient in many instances.
However, even IF you are using BitTorrent, having multi-part RARs is extremely handy when only ONE or FEW of the RARs are corrupted - you only have to download a small chunk of data, perhaps from another provider, to complete the media in question.
If it's distributed as a monolithic file, you have to then download another 12 GB (or more!
) to get the complete file.
So yes, it still serves a purpose, even with BT.
See #33.
I think multi-part RARs are fucking annoying as hell and I wish they would go away, even with their benefits.
I am willing to download another 4, 8, 12 GB on the rare occasions I get corrupted files if it means getting rid of the fucking RARs.
However, I accept the fact that RARs are here and they are here to stay for the immediate future ... therefore I work with them and do not cover my hears and shout that multi-part RARs don't exist and hope they go away.
They won't.
They are here, we have to deal with it.4.
Yes, several media players exist that play multi-part RARs just fine.
Personally, I use XBMC - it is FAR, FAR, FAR away superior to VLC when it comes to playing media of any kind.
It plays everything I've ever seen - There is no other media player on the face of the planet, except mPlayer (which is what XBMC uses) that is as versatile and complete as XBMC.
VLC is a joke compared to the formats mPlayer/XBMC plays out of the box.5.
Now this point always gets peoples feathers ruffled, and I always get a good laugh out of it, because it's so easy to test yourself... but no one bothers to do it.
I have bothered to do it, a number of times, just to be sure I'm not smoking crack:  A RAR'd media file is smaller than the original.
Yes, you read that right and yes, it goes against conventional wisdom, but the fact remains that a typical 60 minute show, weighing in at around 350 MB in size (SD) will be about 20 MB (give or take 10 MB or so) smaller in multi-part RAR's than when it's unrar'd, depending on your CODEC.
While 20MB in savings in this day and age of 2 TB drives seems like a drop in the bucket (and in fact is a drop in the bucket), if you measure that 20 MB out over thousands of files, it becomes a more significant number.
Is it worth RARing all your media?
Probably not - but since the media already comes that way, why unrar it to play it and incur the small but measurable space penalty in addition to using up time and CPU cycles for absolutely no gain at all?6.
One poster seems to misunderstand what a serious media center is.
It's not uncompressed video; It is a media center than can play back anything you throw at it.
VLC is not it (or at least hasn't been it up until now?).
XBMC, however, is.
Either way, my point is (and this addresses the AC comment who is supposedly "close to the dev community," lol - whatever that means.
)  I offered to submit a patch to VLC upwards of 2 years ago that was rejected because they disagreed with the fact that VLC should not play files in such a format.
I happily went on my way and used other media players.
I've never said it wasn't VLC developers perogative to not include that functionality - because it most certainly is... but the fact that they abjectly refuse to accept the fact</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</id>
	<title>Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support. I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos. The old versions seem to be skipping to and from "keyframes" during seeking. It was very frustrating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support .
I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos .
The old versions seem to be skipping to and from " keyframes " during seeking .
It was very frustrating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god for Instant Pausing and Frame by Frame support.
I needed more granularity over the location bar while watching porn videos.
The old versions seem to be skipping to and from "keyframes" during seeking.
It was very frustrating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610047</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>GreenEnvy22</author>
	<datestamp>1246988940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm a little confused. I have a htpc/media center, and when I get a movie that has been compresed into multi-part rar files, I simply extract it to it's original file.
If you have WinRar installed it's a simple right click, and pick extract here or extract to subfolder.
One click, seems pretty simple.
I fail to see how this is a critical feature to add to VLC. It seems simple to me to just setup something to automatically extract the rar's if you are too lazy to do that single click yourself. Of course I can't speak for everyones situation, there might be situations where this isn't possible, but to be it just seems like bloat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a little confused .
I have a htpc/media center , and when I get a movie that has been compresed into multi-part rar files , I simply extract it to it 's original file .
If you have WinRar installed it 's a simple right click , and pick extract here or extract to subfolder .
One click , seems pretty simple .
I fail to see how this is a critical feature to add to VLC .
It seems simple to me to just setup something to automatically extract the rar 's if you are too lazy to do that single click yourself .
Of course I ca n't speak for everyones situation , there might be situations where this is n't possible , but to be it just seems like bloat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a little confused.
I have a htpc/media center, and when I get a movie that has been compresed into multi-part rar files, I simply extract it to it's original file.
If you have WinRar installed it's a simple right click, and pick extract here or extract to subfolder.
One click, seems pretty simple.
I fail to see how this is a critical feature to add to VLC.
It seems simple to me to just setup something to automatically extract the rar's if you are too lazy to do that single click yourself.
Of course I can't speak for everyones situation, there might be situations where this isn't possible, but to be it just seems like bloat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609149</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What software actually has good and working hardware acceleration for h.264? I am not talking about hardware accelerated blu-ray discs. I want to be able to read h.264 in MKVs or AVIs as well. I don't know any software which can do this well and is usable so I stick with VLC. Anyways, my cheap dual core CPU can play a 15GB H.264 1080p movie so acceleration isn't that much an issue, and you won't even care in a few years, just like you don't care about acceleration for MPEG2 DVDs when you watch them in your computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What software actually has good and working hardware acceleration for h.264 ?
I am not talking about hardware accelerated blu-ray discs .
I want to be able to read h.264 in MKVs or AVIs as well .
I do n't know any software which can do this well and is usable so I stick with VLC .
Anyways , my cheap dual core CPU can play a 15GB H.264 1080p movie so acceleration is n't that much an issue , and you wo n't even care in a few years , just like you do n't care about acceleration for MPEG2 DVDs when you watch them in your computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What software actually has good and working hardware acceleration for h.264?
I am not talking about hardware accelerated blu-ray discs.
I want to be able to read h.264 in MKVs or AVIs as well.
I don't know any software which can do this well and is usable so I stick with VLC.
Anyways, my cheap dual core CPU can play a 15GB H.264 1080p movie so acceleration isn't that much an issue, and you won't even care in a few years, just like you don't care about acceleration for MPEG2 DVDs when you watch them in your computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610431</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>SpacePirate20X6</author>
	<datestamp>1246990620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will play files that are zipped, not split. This is useful when compacting a video\_ts folder, for instance, instead of having it broken into several smaller<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.vob files.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will play files that are zipped , not split .
This is useful when compacting a video \ _ts folder , for instance , instead of having it broken into several smaller .vob files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will play files that are zipped, not split.
This is useful when compacting a video\_ts folder, for instance, instead of having it broken into several smaller .vob files.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608173</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1246981680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</p></div><p>Ah, nope, that's Janet.  Ms. Jackson if you're nasty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately ? Ah , nope , that 's Janet .
Ms. Jackson if you 're nasty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?Ah, nope, that's Janet.
Ms. Jackson if you're nasty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609045</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246985040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>VLC didn't pay them, so if you need a patent license then yes. But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs, and to play those you'll be a criminal as well so why bother.</p></div><p>patents can only exist on hardware and physical methods, they cannot exist on a non-physical idea, so no need to pay them anything for reverse engineering it.</p><p>there is also NO legal basis whatever for the "country codes" on dvds. therefore, if you have disks coded for regions outside of your own, there is nothing at all criminal about playing legally bought, officially produced disks, no matter where they were bought.</p><p>of course, some countries treat their populace as nothing more than a cash-cow to squeeze all they can from and they are not afforded the freedoms the more civilised countries have, and they may have more restrictive laws designed solely to criminalise reasonable behaviour</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC did n't pay them , so if you need a patent license then yes .
But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs , and to play those you 'll be a criminal as well so why bother.patents can only exist on hardware and physical methods , they can not exist on a non-physical idea , so no need to pay them anything for reverse engineering it.there is also NO legal basis whatever for the " country codes " on dvds .
therefore , if you have disks coded for regions outside of your own , there is nothing at all criminal about playing legally bought , officially produced disks , no matter where they were bought.of course , some countries treat their populace as nothing more than a cash-cow to squeeze all they can from and they are not afforded the freedoms the more civilised countries have , and they may have more restrictive laws designed solely to criminalise reasonable behaviour</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC didn't pay them, so if you need a patent license then yes.
But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs, and to play those you'll be a criminal as well so why bother.patents can only exist on hardware and physical methods, they cannot exist on a non-physical idea, so no need to pay them anything for reverse engineering it.there is also NO legal basis whatever for the "country codes" on dvds.
therefore, if you have disks coded for regions outside of your own, there is nothing at all criminal about playing legally bought, officially produced disks, no matter where they were bought.of course, some countries treat their populace as nothing more than a cash-cow to squeeze all they can from and they are not afforded the freedoms the more civilised countries have, and they may have more restrictive laws designed solely to criminalise reasonable behaviour
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</id>
	<title>Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.</p><p>Still, it's a great do it all player / streamer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback , I 'm not going back to VLC.Still , it 's a great do it all player / streamer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.Still, it's a great do it all player / streamer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608673</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1246983480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.</i></p><p>People are looking into hardware accelerated codecs. Some of the approaches aren't cross-platform, but it is better to see some progress somewhere, than none at all. I holding out for solutions that can take advantage of stuff like OpenCL.</p><p>Another focus for getting hardware accelerated video into VLC is ffmpeg, though I am not sure what sort of effort if being done here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback , I 'm not going back to VLC.People are looking into hardware accelerated codecs .
Some of the approaches are n't cross-platform , but it is better to see some progress somewhere , than none at all .
I holding out for solutions that can take advantage of stuff like OpenCL.Another focus for getting hardware accelerated video into VLC is ffmpeg , though I am not sure what sort of effort if being done here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without hardware accelerated h.264 playback, I'm not going back to VLC.People are looking into hardware accelerated codecs.
Some of the approaches aren't cross-platform, but it is better to see some progress somewhere, than none at all.
I holding out for solutions that can take advantage of stuff like OpenCL.Another focus for getting hardware accelerated video into VLC is ffmpeg, though I am not sure what sort of effort if being done here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619833</id>
	<title>Re:AC3/DTS passthrough in windows?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247057580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema. So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.</p><p>VLC I can't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all (never could on any version) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.</p></div><p>I had that too. Change the audio output device in the preferences to one of the others. I can't remember off the top of my head, but there's only one that will pass through cleanly. NOT any of the DirectX ones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema .
So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.VLC I ca n't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all ( never could on any version ) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.I had that too .
Change the audio output device in the preferences to one of the others .
I ca n't remember off the top of my head , but there 's only one that will pass through cleanly .
NOT any of the DirectX ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema.
So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.VLC I can't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all (never could on any version) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.I had that too.
Change the audio output device in the preferences to one of the others.
I can't remember off the top of my head, but there's only one that will pass through cleanly.
NOT any of the DirectX ones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613647</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246959840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... It's why I gave up on my Linux expirament (along with "If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass, I'm not using it.")</p></div><p>And spelling, apparently.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... It 's why I gave up on my Linux expirament ( along with " If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass , I 'm not using it .
" ) And spelling , apparently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... It's why I gave up on my Linux expirament (along with "If it makes the things I want to do a horrible pain in the ass, I'm not using it.
")And spelling, apparently.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612081</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>JHromadka</author>
	<datestamp>1246996740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there a way to mute playback in the app when playing at faster speeds?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there a way to mute playback in the app when playing at faster speeds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there a way to mute playback in the app when playing at faster speeds?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28730035</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247846460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to ask, what is so bloody complicated with it?  I install it, do a couple of minor preference changes (change my full screen shortcut, stop showing filename at startup of file, both not necessary for most users), and I use it.  What the heck are people doing with it that makes it complicated?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to ask , what is so bloody complicated with it ?
I install it , do a couple of minor preference changes ( change my full screen shortcut , stop showing filename at startup of file , both not necessary for most users ) , and I use it .
What the heck are people doing with it that makes it complicated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to ask, what is so bloody complicated with it?
I install it, do a couple of minor preference changes (change my full screen shortcut, stop showing filename at startup of file, both not necessary for most users), and I use it.
What the heck are people doing with it that makes it complicated?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607905</id>
	<title>Consolidation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of this wouldn't be necessary if they consolidated media types. What's so bad about having one extension? I'm going to get that done. Videos, music and pictures will all have the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.dwieeb extension. You'll see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of this would n't be necessary if they consolidated media types .
What 's so bad about having one extension ?
I 'm going to get that done .
Videos , music and pictures will all have the .dwieeb extension .
You 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of this wouldn't be necessary if they consolidated media types.
What's so bad about having one extension?
I'm going to get that done.
Videos, music and pictures will all have the .dwieeb extension.
You'll see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613247</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246958340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because iCal in 10.5 sucks ass and the Finder is crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because iCal in 10.5 sucks ass and the Finder is crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because iCal in 10.5 sucks ass and the Finder is crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613987</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246961160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of bla bla bla and smart asses answering this one... now: what if I want RAR (not necessarily multi-part RAR) because I archive my stuff with the additional parity records in order to be able to rebuild in case of partial media failure?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of bla bla bla and smart asses answering this one... now : what if I want RAR ( not necessarily multi-part RAR ) because I archive my stuff with the additional parity records in order to be able to rebuild in case of partial media failure ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of bla bla bla and smart asses answering this one... now: what if I want RAR (not necessarily multi-part RAR) because I archive my stuff with the additional parity records in order to be able to rebuild in case of partial media failure?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616579</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1246976460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Us now-suffering Amarok users hear you.  Oh yes we hear you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Us now-suffering Amarok users hear you .
Oh yes we hear you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Us now-suffering Amarok users hear you.
Oh yes we hear you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28628089</id>
	<title>Re:Why does VLC render video like crap?</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1247046300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's additional deblocking that you can turn on by setting "Input &amp; Codecs | Codecs / Muxers | Post-Processing quality" to 6.  This will smooth out quantization artifacts due to high levels of compression -- essentially, it will get rid of the grey squares that seem to show up particularly in dark shadowy areas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's additional deblocking that you can turn on by setting " Input &amp; Codecs | Codecs / Muxers | Post-Processing quality " to 6 .
This will smooth out quantization artifacts due to high levels of compression -- essentially , it will get rid of the grey squares that seem to show up particularly in dark shadowy areas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's additional deblocking that you can turn on by setting "Input &amp; Codecs | Codecs / Muxers | Post-Processing quality" to 6.
This will smooth out quantization artifacts due to high levels of compression -- essentially, it will get rid of the grey squares that seem to show up particularly in dark shadowy areas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387</id>
	<title>Does it now play DVDs with "piracy" warnings?</title>
	<author>llogiq</author>
	<datestamp>1246982460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found that VLC 0.9.9 ceased playback on the last seconds of a pesky "piracy" warning for two recent original DVDs (What are those warnings for anyway? It's not that I'm planning to steal any boat...). Has anyone else had this issue?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found that VLC 0.9.9 ceased playback on the last seconds of a pesky " piracy " warning for two recent original DVDs ( What are those warnings for anyway ?
It 's not that I 'm planning to steal any boat... ) .
Has anyone else had this issue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found that VLC 0.9.9 ceased playback on the last seconds of a pesky "piracy" warning for two recent original DVDs (What are those warnings for anyway?
It's not that I'm planning to steal any boat...).
Has anyone else had this issue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611407</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1246994220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed. Not too long ago I had a conversation on here with someone where I was trying to explain this very thing.</p><p>I use VLC for videos. Shorter video clips often in windows (short, likely to use the controls), long movies usually in full-screen (clean, no borders, and I'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback).</p><p>I use WinAmp for audio. Tiny skin, sits in the corner of the screen when it's not minimized completely. Usually, I keep it minimized, no taskbar button, just the systray icon. Again, I'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Not too long ago I had a conversation on here with someone where I was trying to explain this very thing.I use VLC for videos .
Shorter video clips often in windows ( short , likely to use the controls ) , long movies usually in full-screen ( clean , no borders , and I 'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback ) .I use WinAmp for audio .
Tiny skin , sits in the corner of the screen when it 's not minimized completely .
Usually , I keep it minimized , no taskbar button , just the systray icon .
Again , I 'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Not too long ago I had a conversation on here with someone where I was trying to explain this very thing.I use VLC for videos.
Shorter video clips often in windows (short, likely to use the controls), long movies usually in full-screen (clean, no borders, and I'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback).I use WinAmp for audio.
Tiny skin, sits in the corner of the screen when it's not minimized completely.
Usually, I keep it minimized, no taskbar button, just the systray icon.
Again, I'll use the keyboard shortcuts if I need to do much of anything to the playback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608069</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware acceleration</title>
	<author>je ne sais quoi</author>
	<datestamp>1246981200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might want to read <a href="http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/post/2009/04/19/Decoding-video-in-VLC-using-VAAPI-and-nVidia" title="jbkempf.com">this</a> [jbkempf.com] then.  It appears that there are even <a href="http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/" title="splitted-desktop.com">patches</a> [splitted-desktop.com] available for vdpau (=NVIDIA's hardware acceleration).  I haven't tried this yet myself though (but will be as soon as I get home from work).</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to read this [ jbkempf.com ] then .
It appears that there are even patches [ splitted-desktop.com ] available for vdpau ( = NVIDIA 's hardware acceleration ) .
I have n't tried this yet myself though ( but will be as soon as I get home from work ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to read this [jbkempf.com] then.
It appears that there are even patches [splitted-desktop.com] available for vdpau (=NVIDIA's hardware acceleration).
I haven't tried this yet myself though (but will be as soon as I get home from work).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</id>
	<title>So it plays back media</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1246980000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that it?</p><p>These days, if all you do is one thing, no matter how well you do it, you're always only going to be known for that one thing.</p><p>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that it ? These days , if all you do is one thing , no matter how well you do it , you 're always only going to be known for that one thing.To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that it?These days, if all you do is one thing, no matter how well you do it, you're always only going to be known for that one thing.To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608285</id>
	<title>Re:Talk to the frog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC is a student project. I can tell by some of the mutexes and by having seen quite a few student projects in my time.<br>Also, OggFrog is not a replacement for VLC. Oggfrog.com even has a get VLC button on the main page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC is a student project .
I can tell by some of the mutexes and by having seen quite a few student projects in my time.Also , OggFrog is not a replacement for VLC .
Oggfrog.com even has a get VLC button on the main page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC is a student project.
I can tell by some of the mutexes and by having seen quite a few student projects in my time.Also, OggFrog is not a replacement for VLC.
Oggfrog.com even has a get VLC button on the main page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608749</id>
	<title>GMail Beta</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246983840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When will GMail finally get out of Beta? It's been in Beta for years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When will GMail finally get out of Beta ?
It 's been in Beta for years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will GMail finally get out of Beta?
It's been in Beta for years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. You're too worthless to get sued.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
You 're too worthless to get sued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
You're too worthless to get sued.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is that it?</p><p>These days, if all you do is one thing, no matter how well you do it, you're always only going to be known for that one thing.</p><p>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</p></div><p>What in the hell are you talking about?  I hope your attitude is not commonplace.  I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform (Win XP, Linux) for me that allows me to record streams and shoutcasts of any nature to any codec with any number of parameters<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and a decent GUI interface so far.  In VLC, I can open any WMV or AVI file without any fear of some messed up virus destroying my WinXP machine.   <br> <br>

You know it's funny.  You make media playback sound so trivial.  Yet the number of solutions out there prove that nobody has perfected it.  VLC has impressed me time and time again.  I worship it for its simplicity.  Have you even used said software?  Or are you just bitter about something?  <br> <br>

It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity!  That's such a herculean task, what more could you ask from it!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that it ? These days , if all you do is one thing , no matter how well you do it , you 're always only going to be known for that one thing.To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately ? What in the hell are you talking about ?
I hope your attitude is not commonplace .
I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I 've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform ( Win XP , Linux ) for me that allows me to record streams and shoutcasts of any nature to any codec with any number of parameters ... and a decent GUI interface so far .
In VLC , I can open any WMV or AVI file without any fear of some messed up virus destroying my WinXP machine .
You know it 's funny .
You make media playback sound so trivial .
Yet the number of solutions out there prove that nobody has perfected it .
VLC has impressed me time and time again .
I worship it for its simplicity .
Have you even used said software ?
Or are you just bitter about something ?
It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity !
That 's such a herculean task , what more could you ask from it !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that it?These days, if all you do is one thing, no matter how well you do it, you're always only going to be known for that one thing.To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?What in the hell are you talking about?
I hope your attitude is not commonplace.
I am not afraid to stand up for VLC for I've never found something that has worked so flawlessly crossplatform (Win XP, Linux) for me that allows me to record streams and shoutcasts of any nature to any codec with any number of parameters ... and a decent GUI interface so far.
In VLC, I can open any WMV or AVI file without any fear of some messed up virus destroying my WinXP machine.
You know it's funny.
You make media playback sound so trivial.
Yet the number of solutions out there prove that nobody has perfected it.
VLC has impressed me time and time again.
I worship it for its simplicity.
Have you even used said software?
Or are you just bitter about something?
It plays every freaking codec under the sun with dead simplicity!
That's such a herculean task, what more could you ask from it!
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617181</id>
	<title>Is SWSCALE working in OS X?</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1246982100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know this hasn't been working for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.99 and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.99a. I really miss Lanczos for upscaling to my HDTV from my HTPC. Especially for those really small sub-dvd resolutions. I think I saw that there was some sort of build issue and they disabled it.<br> <br>

I don't see anything to indicate it's been fixed.<br> <br>

Does anyone know?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this has n't been working for .99 and .99a .
I really miss Lanczos for upscaling to my HDTV from my HTPC .
Especially for those really small sub-dvd resolutions .
I think I saw that there was some sort of build issue and they disabled it .
I do n't see anything to indicate it 's been fixed .
Does anyone know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this hasn't been working for .99 and .99a.
I really miss Lanczos for upscaling to my HDTV from my HTPC.
Especially for those really small sub-dvd resolutions.
I think I saw that there was some sort of build issue and they disabled it.
I don't see anything to indicate it's been fixed.
Does anyone know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608813</id>
	<title>Shame they broke...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the nice simple GUI it had before. (the main GUI)</p><p>Who thought it was a nice idea to have 2 rows of buttons when it could have easily been on one row?<br>And why the fancy shmancy volume control?  Give me a flat line any day.  (in before Death)<br>At least they fixed the terrible Options GUI(s) though, holy headache. (let's not forget the page with all the hotkeys... oh god, so many input boxes! THE HORROR!)</p><p>On a more technical note, i had a bug where it was taking ages to load an MKV with subtitles, anyone know if anything along those lines were mentioned in any bug fixes? (or generally mentioned as a bug)<br>I had to resort to MPC because of the annoyance it caused.  (so did my friend actually now that i think about it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the nice simple GUI it had before .
( the main GUI ) Who thought it was a nice idea to have 2 rows of buttons when it could have easily been on one row ? And why the fancy shmancy volume control ?
Give me a flat line any day .
( in before Death ) At least they fixed the terrible Options GUI ( s ) though , holy headache .
( let 's not forget the page with all the hotkeys... oh god , so many input boxes !
THE HORROR !
) On a more technical note , i had a bug where it was taking ages to load an MKV with subtitles , anyone know if anything along those lines were mentioned in any bug fixes ?
( or generally mentioned as a bug ) I had to resort to MPC because of the annoyance it caused .
( so did my friend actually now that i think about it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the nice simple GUI it had before.
(the main GUI)Who thought it was a nice idea to have 2 rows of buttons when it could have easily been on one row?And why the fancy shmancy volume control?
Give me a flat line any day.
(in before Death)At least they fixed the terrible Options GUI(s) though, holy headache.
(let's not forget the page with all the hotkeys... oh god, so many input boxes!
THE HORROR!
)On a more technical note, i had a bug where it was taking ages to load an MKV with subtitles, anyone know if anything along those lines were mentioned in any bug fixes?
(or generally mentioned as a bug)I had to resort to MPC because of the annoyance it caused.
(so did my friend actually now that i think about it)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</id>
	<title>Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246983660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like VLC, I really do.  For that matter, I like xine too.  But neither one, as far as I can tell, can do one thing that mplayer does: Display closed captioning.  No, that's not DVD subtitles.  It's purely a US American thing, so is routinely ignored, or at least misunderstood, by the international communities that maintain these products.</p><p>I watched a thread on a VLC (or was it xine?) discussion forum where somebody asked about closed captioning support.  After about twelve messages, they finally determined that no, it really wasn't the same as subtitles (some participants never were convinced of that fact), but was "some American thing", at which point amidst a lot of tongue clucking and regrets, the thread fizzled out.</p><p>So until a media player can display closed captions, I'm not really able to use it.  But nice try, guys, and keep up the good work.</p><p>(Yes, I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code, locate the closed-captioning bits, extract them, and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches.  I'll get right on that, mmm-hmmm!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like VLC , I really do .
For that matter , I like xine too .
But neither one , as far as I can tell , can do one thing that mplayer does : Display closed captioning .
No , that 's not DVD subtitles .
It 's purely a US American thing , so is routinely ignored , or at least misunderstood , by the international communities that maintain these products.I watched a thread on a VLC ( or was it xine ?
) discussion forum where somebody asked about closed captioning support .
After about twelve messages , they finally determined that no , it really was n't the same as subtitles ( some participants never were convinced of that fact ) , but was " some American thing " , at which point amidst a lot of tongue clucking and regrets , the thread fizzled out.So until a media player can display closed captions , I 'm not really able to use it .
But nice try , guys , and keep up the good work .
( Yes , I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code , locate the closed-captioning bits , extract them , and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches .
I 'll get right on that , mmm-hmmm !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like VLC, I really do.
For that matter, I like xine too.
But neither one, as far as I can tell, can do one thing that mplayer does: Display closed captioning.
No, that's not DVD subtitles.
It's purely a US American thing, so is routinely ignored, or at least misunderstood, by the international communities that maintain these products.I watched a thread on a VLC (or was it xine?
) discussion forum where somebody asked about closed captioning support.
After about twelve messages, they finally determined that no, it really wasn't the same as subtitles (some participants never were convinced of that fact), but was "some American thing", at which point amidst a lot of tongue clucking and regrets, the thread fizzled out.So until a media player can display closed captions, I'm not really able to use it.
But nice try, guys, and keep up the good work.
(Yes, I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code, locate the closed-captioning bits, extract them, and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches.
I'll get right on that, mmm-hmmm!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611417</id>
	<title>Re:It DOES support multi-RAR!!</title>
	<author>PRlME</author>
	<datestamp>1246994220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was just about to suggest using VLCRAAR for RAR playback (which I've been using for years), but I just noticed that VLCRAAR is broken in 1.0 (works fine in 0.9.9).

HOWEVER, I then tried loading a RAR archive straight up and it played the video fine!  It even allows for fast-forwarding across multi-RAR archives!   I'm not sure why they didn't advertise this in the 1.0 launch, but this is great!

(note - doesn't appear to work with HD content, only divx/xvid worked.  For HD content RAR archives, I recommend BS Player Pro + Haali media splitter + ffdshow)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just about to suggest using VLCRAAR for RAR playback ( which I 've been using for years ) , but I just noticed that VLCRAAR is broken in 1.0 ( works fine in 0.9.9 ) .
HOWEVER , I then tried loading a RAR archive straight up and it played the video fine !
It even allows for fast-forwarding across multi-RAR archives !
I 'm not sure why they did n't advertise this in the 1.0 launch , but this is great !
( note - does n't appear to work with HD content , only divx/xvid worked .
For HD content RAR archives , I recommend BS Player Pro + Haali media splitter + ffdshow )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just about to suggest using VLCRAAR for RAR playback (which I've been using for years), but I just noticed that VLCRAAR is broken in 1.0 (works fine in 0.9.9).
HOWEVER, I then tried loading a RAR archive straight up and it played the video fine!
It even allows for fast-forwarding across multi-RAR archives!
I'm not sure why they didn't advertise this in the 1.0 launch, but this is great!
(note - doesn't appear to work with HD content, only divx/xvid worked.
For HD content RAR archives, I recommend BS Player Pro + Haali media splitter + ffdshow)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608395</id>
	<title>Re:Does it still have a GUI interface</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.  Due to confusion, the GUI has been eliminated.</p><p>You now have to type "vl -dev \/\device\opt\ifiea -drive \f3fsag -output fs/fb/nv -disp sc1 -sz 15.4 -fmt wdsc -play now"</p><p>At least...on my system you do.  It's easy, though.  Just change the command line to match your screen and video hardware, as well as whatever file or disk you want to play, and you'll have it working in no time.</p><p>Ok...now that my sarcasm is done....what the heck is wrong with a 1997 GUI?  They were simple, quick, lightweight, and did what the heck you wanted without getting in your way.<br>Nowadays we have monstrosities like Windows Media Player 11, which is pretty much impossible to navigate.</p><p>(Posted anon due to previous moderation.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
Due to confusion , the GUI has been eliminated.You now have to type " vl -dev \ / \ device \ opt \ ifiea -drive \ f3fsag -output fs/fb/nv -disp sc1 -sz 15.4 -fmt wdsc -play now " At least...on my system you do .
It 's easy , though .
Just change the command line to match your screen and video hardware , as well as whatever file or disk you want to play , and you 'll have it working in no time.Ok...now that my sarcasm is done....what the heck is wrong with a 1997 GUI ?
They were simple , quick , lightweight , and did what the heck you wanted without getting in your way.Nowadays we have monstrosities like Windows Media Player 11 , which is pretty much impossible to navigate .
( Posted anon due to previous moderation .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
Due to confusion, the GUI has been eliminated.You now have to type "vl -dev \/\device\opt\ifiea -drive \f3fsag -output fs/fb/nv -disp sc1 -sz 15.4 -fmt wdsc -play now"At least...on my system you do.
It's easy, though.
Just change the command line to match your screen and video hardware, as well as whatever file or disk you want to play, and you'll have it working in no time.Ok...now that my sarcasm is done....what the heck is wrong with a 1997 GUI?
They were simple, quick, lightweight, and did what the heck you wanted without getting in your way.Nowadays we have monstrosities like Windows Media Player 11, which is pretty much impossible to navigate.
(Posted anon due to previous moderation.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608669</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>OolimPhon</author>
	<datestamp>1246983480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't turn it up enough you can't hear the whoooosh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't turn it up enough you ca n't hear the whoooosh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't turn it up enough you can't hear the whoooosh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608923</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>chammy</author>
	<datestamp>1246984500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats too bad for you, vlc plays 1080p h264 content just fine on my cheapo dualcore AMD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats too bad for you , vlc plays 1080p h264 content just fine on my cheapo dualcore AMD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats too bad for you, vlc plays 1080p h264 content just fine on my cheapo dualcore AMD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611155</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246993380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So then what is the difference between subtitles and closed captions??</p><p>According to Wikipedia:</p><p>Most of the world does not distinguish captions from subtitles. In the United States and Canada, these terms do have different meanings, however: "subtitles" assume the viewer can hear but cannot understand the language or accent, or the speech is not entirely clear, so they only transcribe dialogue and some on-screen text. "Captions" aim to describe all significant audio content&#226;"spoken dialogue and non-speech information such as the identity of speakers and, occasionally, their manner of speaking&#226;"along with music or sound effects using words or symbols.</p><p>To me, this sound like the difference is entirely the content of what gets displayed. So why should VLC be able to display subtitles and not closed captions??? I don't get it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So then what is the difference between subtitles and closed captions ?
? According to Wikipedia : Most of the world does not distinguish captions from subtitles .
In the United States and Canada , these terms do have different meanings , however : " subtitles " assume the viewer can hear but can not understand the language or accent , or the speech is not entirely clear , so they only transcribe dialogue and some on-screen text .
" Captions " aim to describe all significant audio content   " spoken dialogue and non-speech information such as the identity of speakers and , occasionally , their manner of speaking   " along with music or sound effects using words or symbols.To me , this sound like the difference is entirely the content of what gets displayed .
So why should VLC be able to display subtitles and not closed captions ? ? ?
I do n't get it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So then what is the difference between subtitles and closed captions?
?According to Wikipedia:Most of the world does not distinguish captions from subtitles.
In the United States and Canada, these terms do have different meanings, however: "subtitles" assume the viewer can hear but cannot understand the language or accent, or the speech is not entirely clear, so they only transcribe dialogue and some on-screen text.
"Captions" aim to describe all significant audio contentâ"spoken dialogue and non-speech information such as the identity of speakers and, occasionally, their manner of speakingâ"along with music or sound effects using words or symbols.To me, this sound like the difference is entirely the content of what gets displayed.
So why should VLC be able to display subtitles and not closed captions???
I don't get it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611141</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1246993260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't RAR covered by patents? I seem to recall that was the reason for Ubuntu having both an 'unrar' and an 'unrar-nonfree' package in the repositories. And while the cynics may point that VLC opens patented video/audio formats just fine, I'm under the impression they simply let ffmpeg decode those instead of doing it themselves and if so, RAR's patent liability would still be a valid reason to reject it from VLC itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong , but was n't RAR covered by patents ?
I seem to recall that was the reason for Ubuntu having both an 'unrar ' and an 'unrar-nonfree ' package in the repositories .
And while the cynics may point that VLC opens patented video/audio formats just fine , I 'm under the impression they simply let ffmpeg decode those instead of doing it themselves and if so , RAR 's patent liability would still be a valid reason to reject it from VLC itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't RAR covered by patents?
I seem to recall that was the reason for Ubuntu having both an 'unrar' and an 'unrar-nonfree' package in the repositories.
And while the cynics may point that VLC opens patented video/audio formats just fine, I'm under the impression they simply let ffmpeg decode those instead of doing it themselves and if so, RAR's patent liability would still be a valid reason to reject it from VLC itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609391</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1246986360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not about being cutting edge, it's about being a catch-all.  VLC is an open source cross-platform (works well and looks relatively native in Linux, OSX, and Windows) video player that plays and transcodes almost any format you throw at it.  And it's not really "another" video player that does this, but pretty much *the* video player that does this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not about being cutting edge , it 's about being a catch-all .
VLC is an open source cross-platform ( works well and looks relatively native in Linux , OSX , and Windows ) video player that plays and transcodes almost any format you throw at it .
And it 's not really " another " video player that does this , but pretty much * the * video player that does this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not about being cutting edge, it's about being a catch-all.
VLC is an open source cross-platform (works well and looks relatively native in Linux, OSX, and Windows) video player that plays and transcodes almost any format you throw at it.
And it's not really "another" video player that does this, but pretty much *the* video player that does this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608129</id>
	<title>Does it still have a GUI interface</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... that looks like it was written in 1997?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... that looks like it was written in 1997 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that looks like it was written in 1997?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619029</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>Slashcrap</author>
	<datestamp>1247044980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format (25GB each one) and they also were played smoothly, so YMMV...</p></div><p>You used 75GB of bandwidth downloading the Matrix trilogy?</p><p>Get off my fucking Internet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format ( 25GB each one ) and they also were played smoothly , so YMMV...You used 75GB of bandwidth downloading the Matrix trilogy ? Get off my fucking Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format (25GB each one) and they also were played smoothly, so YMMV...You used 75GB of bandwidth downloading the Matrix trilogy?Get off my fucking Internet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877</id>
	<title>Talk to the frog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC is a nice student project, but it's got problems.  They can't get the mutexes right.  Something that fundamental, and they screw it up.  Imagine how bad the bugs are when they deal with non-trivial problems.
</p><p>
I prefer the frog.  Ogg Frog.  It's cross platform, GPL, rock solid, and designed/written by a professional with years of experience.  Ogg Frog.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC is a nice student project , but it 's got problems .
They ca n't get the mutexes right .
Something that fundamental , and they screw it up .
Imagine how bad the bugs are when they deal with non-trivial problems .
I prefer the frog .
Ogg Frog .
It 's cross platform , GPL , rock solid , and designed/written by a professional with years of experience .
Ogg Frog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC is a nice student project, but it's got problems.
They can't get the mutexes right.
Something that fundamental, and they screw it up.
Imagine how bad the bugs are when they deal with non-trivial problems.
I prefer the frog.
Ogg Frog.
It's cross platform, GPL, rock solid, and designed/written by a professional with years of experience.
Ogg Frog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618565</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246995900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, I did the same experiment and it came down to a choice</p><p>1. Use Linux and learn how to tweak every config from video apps to games to function as well as they did on windows.<br>2. Use windows and learn how to avoid viruses and malware.</p><p>Guess which one won?</p><p>Hint: Users should know about their privacy and security.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , I did the same experiment and it came down to a choice1 .
Use Linux and learn how to tweak every config from video apps to games to function as well as they did on windows.2 .
Use windows and learn how to avoid viruses and malware.Guess which one won ? Hint : Users should know about their privacy and security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, I did the same experiment and it came down to a choice1.
Use Linux and learn how to tweak every config from video apps to games to function as well as they did on windows.2.
Use windows and learn how to avoid viruses and malware.Guess which one won?Hint: Users should know about their privacy and security.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611935</id>
	<title>VLC! FUCK YEAH!</title>
	<author>GameboyRMH</author>
	<datestamp>1246996020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Comin' again to play those muthafuckin' vids YEAH!<br>
VLC! FUCK YEAH!<br>
Freedom is the only way YEAH!<br>
Proprietary players are through,<br>
'cause now they have to answer to<br>
VLC! FUCK YEAH!<br>
It's for everyone 'cuz it's cross-platform!<br>
VLC! FUCK YEAH!<br>
No need to install codec packs now,<br>
It's the dream we all share, the hope for tomorrow
<br> <br>
FUCK YEAH!
<br> <br>
DVD, FUCK YEAH!<br>
Blu-Ray, FUCK YEAH!<br>
Quicktime, FUCK YEAH!<br>
RealVideo, FUCK YEAH!<br>
WMV, FUCK YEAH!<br>
FLV, FUCK YEAH!<br>
DivX, FUCK YEAH!<br>
Matroska, FUCK YEAH!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comin ' again to play those muthafuckin ' vids YEAH !
VLC ! FUCK YEAH !
Freedom is the only way YEAH !
Proprietary players are through , 'cause now they have to answer to VLC !
FUCK YEAH !
It 's for everyone 'cuz it 's cross-platform !
VLC ! FUCK YEAH !
No need to install codec packs now , It 's the dream we all share , the hope for tomorrow FUCK YEAH !
DVD , FUCK YEAH !
Blu-Ray , FUCK YEAH !
Quicktime , FUCK YEAH !
RealVideo , FUCK YEAH !
WMV , FUCK YEAH !
FLV , FUCK YEAH !
DivX , FUCK YEAH !
Matroska , FUCK YEAH ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comin' again to play those muthafuckin' vids YEAH!
VLC! FUCK YEAH!
Freedom is the only way YEAH!
Proprietary players are through,
'cause now they have to answer to
VLC!
FUCK YEAH!
It's for everyone 'cuz it's cross-platform!
VLC! FUCK YEAH!
No need to install codec packs now,
It's the dream we all share, the hope for tomorrow
 
FUCK YEAH!
DVD, FUCK YEAH!
Blu-Ray, FUCK YEAH!
Quicktime, FUCK YEAH!
RealVideo, FUCK YEAH!
WMV, FUCK YEAH!
FLV, FUCK YEAH!
DivX, FUCK YEAH!
Matroska, FUCK YEAH!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618207</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, yes, all very impressive</title>
	<author>Farhood</author>
	<datestamp>1246992000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i just installed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.9.9 on 30+ client computers.  Thanks for the new release, assholes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i just installed .9.9 on 30 + client computers .
Thanks for the new release , assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i just installed .9.9 on 30+ client computers.
Thanks for the new release, assholes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607739</id>
	<title>"GUI in Qt"</title>
	<author>quantic\_oscillation7</author>
	<datestamp>1246980000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"GUI in Qt" now that's nice!

but i'm so addicted to mplayer+smplayer!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" GUI in Qt " now that 's nice !
but i 'm so addicted to mplayer + smplayer ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"GUI in Qt" now that's nice!
but i'm so addicted to mplayer+smplayer!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608207</id>
	<title>Re:Consolidation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.ogg?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.ogg ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.ogg?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608559</id>
	<title>Awesome but where is the Symbian version?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246983120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, we need a good video player like this for mobile devices running Symbian (S60v3 Nokia phones specifically).  Qt is available, what's the deal?</p><p>There are iPhone, Windows CE, and soon probably Android... Where is the Symbian love?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , we need a good video player like this for mobile devices running Symbian ( S60v3 Nokia phones specifically ) .
Qt is available , what 's the deal ? There are iPhone , Windows CE , and soon probably Android... Where is the Symbian love ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, we need a good video player like this for mobile devices running Symbian (S60v3 Nokia phones specifically).
Qt is available, what's the deal?There are iPhone, Windows CE, and soon probably Android... Where is the Symbian love?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607883</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1246980420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC didn't pay them, so if you need a patent license then yes. But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs, and to play those you'll be a criminal as well so why bother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC did n't pay them , so if you need a patent license then yes .
But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs , and to play those you 'll be a criminal as well so why bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC didn't pay them, so if you need a patent license then yes.
But then the most popular MPEG2-encoded content is DVDs, and to play those you'll be a criminal as well so why bother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612105</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>TheoMurpse</author>
	<datestamp>1246996860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was using Tiger on my MBP until I was forced to upgrade two weeks ago because the software the bar exam in Texas requires only works in Leopard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was using Tiger on my MBP until I was forced to upgrade two weeks ago because the software the bar exam in Texas requires only works in Leopard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was using Tiger on my MBP until I was forced to upgrade two weeks ago because the software the bar exam in Texas requires only works in Leopard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609547</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>eldepeche</author>
	<datestamp>1246986900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because I bought my computer in 2006 and it still works fine without paying $129 to upgrade. That would be $129 I couldn't use toward my new laptop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I bought my computer in 2006 and it still works fine without paying $ 129 to upgrade .
That would be $ 129 I could n't use toward my new laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I bought my computer in 2006 and it still works fine without paying $129 to upgrade.
That would be $129 I couldn't use toward my new laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610935</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246992420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've never understood why people create multipart rar torrents. BIttorrent has it's own mechanism for splitting files for download and I don't think it improves dthe filesize by much. Seems totally unecesary to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never understood why people create multipart rar torrents .
BIttorrent has it 's own mechanism for splitting files for download and I do n't think it improves dthe filesize by much .
Seems totally unecesary to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never understood why people create multipart rar torrents.
BIttorrent has it's own mechanism for splitting files for download and I don't think it improves dthe filesize by much.
Seems totally unecesary to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801</id>
	<title>VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would I have to pay royalties to <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/43118/118/" title="tgdaily.com">MPEG LA</a> [tgdaily.com] to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media player</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would I have to pay royalties to MPEG LA [ tgdaily.com ] to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media player</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would I have to pay royalties to MPEG LA [tgdaily.com] to watch MPEG-2 encoded media on VLC media player</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609533</id>
	<title>Agree 100\%</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1246986840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had the exact same problem!  Trying to get that perfect frame to use as a wallpaper was a total PITA...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the exact same problem !
Trying to get that perfect frame to use as a wallpaper was a total PITA... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the exact same problem!
Trying to get that perfect frame to use as a wallpaper was a total PITA... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609613</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246987140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For some people using Linux, well at least for myself, it is the other way around. If a DVD does not want to play on my machine (i.e. it does not do what I want), I do not want to see that movie. However, there was only one instance were I could not play movie on my machine and it was promptly returned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some people using Linux , well at least for myself , it is the other way around .
If a DVD does not want to play on my machine ( i.e .
it does not do what I want ) , I do not want to see that movie .
However , there was only one instance were I could not play movie on my machine and it was promptly returned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some people using Linux, well at least for myself, it is the other way around.
If a DVD does not want to play on my machine (i.e.
it does not do what I want), I do not want to see that movie.
However, there was only one instance were I could not play movie on my machine and it was promptly returned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619763</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1247056980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be interesting to write to the MPEG LA and ask for a user license and see what the charges were.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to write to the MPEG LA and ask for a user license and see what the charges were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to write to the MPEG LA and ask for a user license and see what the charges were.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610567</id>
	<title>you need</title>
	<author>markringen</author>
	<datestamp>1246991100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>because you need to change the video rendering in settings.
change it directX 3D or OpenGL.
it has nothing to do with vlc, just with the systems default settings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>because you need to change the video rendering in settings .
change it directX 3D or OpenGL .
it has nothing to do with vlc , just with the systems default settings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because you need to change the video rendering in settings.
change it directX 3D or OpenGL.
it has nothing to do with vlc, just with the systems default settings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612447</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246998120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(Yes, I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code, locate the closed-captioning bits, extract them, and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches.  I'll get right on that, mmm-hmmm!)</p></div><p>So I cd into my mplayer tree, do a nice "grep -R caption *", and what do I find in sub\_cc.c ?</p><p>"uses source from the xine closed captions decoder"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Yes , I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code , locate the closed-captioning bits , extract them , and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches .
I 'll get right on that , mmm-hmmm !
) So I cd into my mplayer tree , do a nice " grep -R caption * " , and what do I find in sub \ _cc.c ?
" uses source from the xine closed captions decoder "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Yes, I am sure I could dive into the mplayer code, locate the closed-captioning bits, extract them, and submit them to both VLC and xine as patches.
I'll get right on that, mmm-hmmm!
)So I cd into my mplayer tree, do a nice "grep -R caption *", and what do I find in sub\_cc.c ?
"uses source from the xine closed captions decoder"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611691</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Joe Jay Bee</author>
	<datestamp>1246995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I switched back down to it because my early-2007 Intel iMac Core 2 Duo runs like shit on Leopard. There was nothing on 10.5's features list that I really cared about all that much, nothing I've missed since switching, and Tiger runs pretty much everything I use anyway. Oh, and it's not a slow piece of shit. That helps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I switched back down to it because my early-2007 Intel iMac Core 2 Duo runs like shit on Leopard .
There was nothing on 10.5 's features list that I really cared about all that much , nothing I 've missed since switching , and Tiger runs pretty much everything I use anyway .
Oh , and it 's not a slow piece of shit .
That helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I switched back down to it because my early-2007 Intel iMac Core 2 Duo runs like shit on Leopard.
There was nothing on 10.5's features list that I really cared about all that much, nothing I've missed since switching, and Tiger runs pretty much everything I use anyway.
Oh, and it's not a slow piece of shit.
That helps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608441</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>ptelligence</author>
	<datestamp>1246982700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't possibly still be holding on to the assumption that Michael and Janet are the same person.  Not after recent events.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't possibly still be holding on to the assumption that Michael and Janet are the same person .
Not after recent events .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't possibly still be holding on to the assumption that Michael and Janet are the same person.
Not after recent events.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609089</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>omgarthas</author>
	<datestamp>1246985280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My 9 months old quad core runs smoothly all the 1080p movies I have played so far (A LOT, believe me).<br> <br>

Also, I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format (25GB each one) and they also were played smoothly, so YMMV...</htmltext>
<tokenext>My 9 months old quad core runs smoothly all the 1080p movies I have played so far ( A LOT , believe me ) .
Also , I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format ( 25GB each one ) and they also were played smoothly , so YMMV.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My 9 months old quad core runs smoothly all the 1080p movies I have played so far (A LOT, believe me).
Also, I was very surprised when I got the Matrix trilogy from the intertubes in raw BluRay format (25GB each one) and they also were played smoothly, so YMMV...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609773</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246987800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no it doesn't (play every codec under the sun)<br>"<br>No suitable decoder module:<br>VLC does not support the audio or video format "IV41". Unfortunately there is no way for you to fix this.<br>"<br>http://www.engr.colostate.edu/me/facil/dynamics/files/drop.avi</p><p>also it has problems with CRAM codec with not being able to transform it (flip horizontally or vertically)<br>http://www.stockshots.com/images/videoclips/city\_lights.avi</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no it does n't ( play every codec under the sun ) " No suitable decoder module : VLC does not support the audio or video format " IV41 " .
Unfortunately there is no way for you to fix this .
" http : //www.engr.colostate.edu/me/facil/dynamics/files/drop.avialso it has problems with CRAM codec with not being able to transform it ( flip horizontally or vertically ) http : //www.stockshots.com/images/videoclips/city \ _lights.avi</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no it doesn't (play every codec under the sun)"No suitable decoder module:VLC does not support the audio or video format "IV41".
Unfortunately there is no way for you to fix this.
"http://www.engr.colostate.edu/me/facil/dynamics/files/drop.avialso it has problems with CRAM codec with not being able to transform it (flip horizontally or vertically)http://www.stockshots.com/images/videoclips/city\_lights.avi</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609479</id>
	<title>Re: Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246986600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because there is nothing worth $129 in 10.5.</p><p>Because 10.4 works.</p><p>Because 10.5 is a bloated warthog.</p><p>Because I have a machine that has the cojones for 10.4 but not 10.5.</p><p>Because 10.5 breaks things that I use.  Please note, I'm not complaining, I'm explaining.</p><p>To sum up: I have 10.4, no reason to go to 10.5, several reasons not to go to 10.5.</p><p>However, if you do not find my reasons compelling for me, write me a check for $129 x 4 machines (the family pack will be cheaper) and I'll be glad to purchase 10.5, even if I don't install it on all my machines.</p><p>I'm personally sad that VLC doesn't support 10.4.  10.5 is the Vista of Mac OS X (well, not quite THAT bad) and 10.4 is still a supported OS.  If they are going to support Mac OS X, they should support 10.4.  But hey, VLC 1.0 isn't enough to get to me to upgrade and any paid-for program that doesn't have a 10.4 version (I'm looking at you "Delicious Library") doesn't get my money.</p><p>10.6 I might actually get, once it gets out of beta around 10.6.2, if it is good as promised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because there is nothing worth $ 129 in 10.5.Because 10.4 works.Because 10.5 is a bloated warthog.Because I have a machine that has the cojones for 10.4 but not 10.5.Because 10.5 breaks things that I use .
Please note , I 'm not complaining , I 'm explaining.To sum up : I have 10.4 , no reason to go to 10.5 , several reasons not to go to 10.5.However , if you do not find my reasons compelling for me , write me a check for $ 129 x 4 machines ( the family pack will be cheaper ) and I 'll be glad to purchase 10.5 , even if I do n't install it on all my machines.I 'm personally sad that VLC does n't support 10.4 .
10.5 is the Vista of Mac OS X ( well , not quite THAT bad ) and 10.4 is still a supported OS .
If they are going to support Mac OS X , they should support 10.4 .
But hey , VLC 1.0 is n't enough to get to me to upgrade and any paid-for program that does n't have a 10.4 version ( I 'm looking at you " Delicious Library " ) does n't get my money.10.6 I might actually get , once it gets out of beta around 10.6.2 , if it is good as promised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because there is nothing worth $129 in 10.5.Because 10.4 works.Because 10.5 is a bloated warthog.Because I have a machine that has the cojones for 10.4 but not 10.5.Because 10.5 breaks things that I use.
Please note, I'm not complaining, I'm explaining.To sum up: I have 10.4, no reason to go to 10.5, several reasons not to go to 10.5.However, if you do not find my reasons compelling for me, write me a check for $129 x 4 machines (the family pack will be cheaper) and I'll be glad to purchase 10.5, even if I don't install it on all my machines.I'm personally sad that VLC doesn't support 10.4.
10.5 is the Vista of Mac OS X (well, not quite THAT bad) and 10.4 is still a supported OS.
If they are going to support Mac OS X, they should support 10.4.
But hey, VLC 1.0 isn't enough to get to me to upgrade and any paid-for program that doesn't have a 10.4 version (I'm looking at you "Delicious Library") doesn't get my money.10.6 I might actually get, once it gets out of beta around 10.6.2, if it is good as promised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610625</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246991340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is playback of multi part rar/archives such an requirement in a media player?</p><p>The vast majority of media is already compressed. That's why, for example, a standard xvid, dvd/mpeg2, divx, [insert favourite codec here] is a fraction of the size of the source/uncompressed/raw media. Use of multi-part archives is mainly to simplify transport/distribution/rebuilding of the compressed file. If the archive is considerably smaller than the compressed media then the codec isn't doing its job properly.</p><p>I may have missed something, but unless you keep a whole load of uncompressed media in multipart archives that you frequently access, not being arsed to unpack the rars just seems lazy for the sake of a couple of clicks.</p><p>I'm a media player home cinema guy <a href="http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net] myself so don't even know if it is supported or not in the latest VLC, but I can just imagine the dev 'princesses' having a good laugh:</p><p>dev1: "Here... check this email... this lazy fk can't even be bothered to extract the movie from multipart rars... he wants it added as a feature..."</p><p>dev2: "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"</p><p>dev3: "Should I start on the code? What's the best approach? Spend time unpacking it completely before playback, play it, then cleanup? Or some clever code to continuously unpack enough to keep the buffers full? What about skipping forward and backward?... What about rar not being open source? I know we can unpack for free but..."</p><p>dev1: "How about 'right click, extract to...' for the lazy fk?"</p><p>world: "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA" x 100<br>
&nbsp; <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is playback of multi part rar/archives such an requirement in a media player ? The vast majority of media is already compressed .
That 's why , for example , a standard xvid , dvd/mpeg2 , divx , [ insert favourite codec here ] is a fraction of the size of the source/uncompressed/raw media .
Use of multi-part archives is mainly to simplify transport/distribution/rebuilding of the compressed file .
If the archive is considerably smaller than the compressed media then the codec is n't doing its job properly.I may have missed something , but unless you keep a whole load of uncompressed media in multipart archives that you frequently access , not being arsed to unpack the rars just seems lazy for the sake of a couple of clicks.I 'm a media player home cinema guy http : //mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ] myself so do n't even know if it is supported or not in the latest VLC , but I can just imagine the dev 'princesses ' having a good laugh : dev1 : " Here... check this email... this lazy fk ca n't even be bothered to extract the movie from multipart rars... he wants it added as a feature... " dev2 : " AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA " dev3 : " Should I start on the code ?
What 's the best approach ?
Spend time unpacking it completely before playback , play it , then cleanup ?
Or some clever code to continuously unpack enough to keep the buffers full ?
What about skipping forward and backward ? .. .
What about rar not being open source ?
I know we can unpack for free but... " dev1 : " How about 'right click , extract to... ' for the lazy fk ?
" world : " AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA " x 100   ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is playback of multi part rar/archives such an requirement in a media player?The vast majority of media is already compressed.
That's why, for example, a standard xvid, dvd/mpeg2, divx, [insert favourite codec here] is a fraction of the size of the source/uncompressed/raw media.
Use of multi-part archives is mainly to simplify transport/distribution/rebuilding of the compressed file.
If the archive is considerably smaller than the compressed media then the codec isn't doing its job properly.I may have missed something, but unless you keep a whole load of uncompressed media in multipart archives that you frequently access, not being arsed to unpack the rars just seems lazy for the sake of a couple of clicks.I'm a media player home cinema guy http://mpc-hc.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net] myself so don't even know if it is supported or not in the latest VLC, but I can just imagine the dev 'princesses' having a good laugh:dev1: "Here... check this email... this lazy fk can't even be bothered to extract the movie from multipart rars... he wants it added as a feature..."dev2: "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"dev3: "Should I start on the code?
What's the best approach?
Spend time unpacking it completely before playback, play it, then cleanup?
Or some clever code to continuously unpack enough to keep the buffers full?
What about skipping forward and backward?...
What about rar not being open source?
I know we can unpack for free but..."dev1: "How about 'right click, extract to...' for the lazy fk?
"world: "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA" x 100
   ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609863</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>smooth wombat</author>
	<datestamp>1246988220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>I don't suppose you never heard of the phrase, "Jack of All Trades, Master of None".</em>

<br> <br>

If you're going to use the quote, at least get it right:

<br> <br>

Jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than Master of one

<br> <br>

That said, I do agree with you that having VLC do one thing, and do it right EVERY time, is a boon.  When we have people who can't play a DVD, we put VLC on their machine and it works. Every time.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't suppose you never heard of the phrase , " Jack of All Trades , Master of None " .
If you 're going to use the quote , at least get it right : Jack of all trades , master of none , though ofttimes better than Master of one That said , I do agree with you that having VLC do one thing , and do it right EVERY time , is a boon .
When we have people who ca n't play a DVD , we put VLC on their machine and it works .
Every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't suppose you never heard of the phrase, "Jack of All Trades, Master of None".
If you're going to use the quote, at least get it right:

 

Jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than Master of one

 

That said, I do agree with you that having VLC do one thing, and do it right EVERY time, is a boon.
When we have people who can't play a DVD, we put VLC on their machine and it works.
Every time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609303</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>CecilPL</author>
	<datestamp>1246986060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't know what's wrong with your box, but 10Mbps 1080p h264 rips are smooth as butter on my 3 year old AMD X2 3800+ (running XP). It's only when I get above about 14-15Mbps that it starts to get choppy, and really who needs the quality to be that high?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know what 's wrong with your box , but 10Mbps 1080p h264 rips are smooth as butter on my 3 year old AMD X2 3800 + ( running XP ) .
It 's only when I get above about 14-15Mbps that it starts to get choppy , and really who needs the quality to be that high ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know what's wrong with your box, but 10Mbps 1080p h264 rips are smooth as butter on my 3 year old AMD X2 3800+ (running XP).
It's only when I get above about 14-15Mbps that it starts to get choppy, and really who needs the quality to be that high?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618157</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Killjoy\_NL</author>
	<datestamp>1246991400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear ya<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear ya : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear ya :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618627</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246996740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We use CC in South America, public channels are required by law to have CC (mostly presidential speeches and political debates), VLC supports CC but it's somewhere hidden in the options YMMV. My only complains about VLC are the funky timeline and some MKV files that show artifacts on fullscreen.<br><br>Europe uses Teletext, wonder whats the format in Asia<br><br>Anyway, thank you guys at VLC, You make an "All Terrain 4x4 FWD RT" software in the realms of video<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<br><br>-i0</htmltext>
<tokenext>We use CC in South America , public channels are required by law to have CC ( mostly presidential speeches and political debates ) , VLC supports CC but it 's somewhere hidden in the options YMMV .
My only complains about VLC are the funky timeline and some MKV files that show artifacts on fullscreen.Europe uses Teletext , wonder whats the format in AsiaAnyway , thank you guys at VLC , You make an " All Terrain 4x4 FWD RT " software in the realms of video : D-i0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We use CC in South America, public channels are required by law to have CC (mostly presidential speeches and political debates), VLC supports CC but it's somewhere hidden in the options YMMV.
My only complains about VLC are the funky timeline and some MKV files that show artifacts on fullscreen.Europe uses Teletext, wonder whats the format in AsiaAnyway, thank you guys at VLC, You make an "All Terrain 4x4 FWD RT" software in the realms of video :D-i0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610071</id>
	<title>Getting sick of...</title>
	<author>MasterEvilAce</author>
	<datestamp>1246989120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm really getting sick of 'rushed' releases with open source / free software.
I found an issue with VLC player's RC3 release (the issue was around for RC1&amp;2 as well, but I reported it during RC3).
It was acknowledged, and confirmed by another user. RC4 got released, I bumped the thread saying the problem still existed in RC4.
Now VLC 1.0 has been released, and the issue still stands. It's a problem with WMV's audio skipping/glitching up.

It's not a complaint about VLC. VLC is really great. It's just really about practices of software releases that seem to be
getting worse and worse lately. Rushing through the beta phase, and ignoring pretty big functionality problems just to get
a new release out in time. I understand these guys are usually not getting paid for their work, but it makes more sense to make
good solid releases rather than just releasing, and then patching a few weeks later.

Having said that, VLC's newest release does fix major gripes I've had with the previous versions of the application, and I look forward to new releases.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really getting sick of 'rushed ' releases with open source / free software .
I found an issue with VLC player 's RC3 release ( the issue was around for RC1&amp;2 as well , but I reported it during RC3 ) .
It was acknowledged , and confirmed by another user .
RC4 got released , I bumped the thread saying the problem still existed in RC4 .
Now VLC 1.0 has been released , and the issue still stands .
It 's a problem with WMV 's audio skipping/glitching up .
It 's not a complaint about VLC .
VLC is really great .
It 's just really about practices of software releases that seem to be getting worse and worse lately .
Rushing through the beta phase , and ignoring pretty big functionality problems just to get a new release out in time .
I understand these guys are usually not getting paid for their work , but it makes more sense to make good solid releases rather than just releasing , and then patching a few weeks later .
Having said that , VLC 's newest release does fix major gripes I 've had with the previous versions of the application , and I look forward to new releases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really getting sick of 'rushed' releases with open source / free software.
I found an issue with VLC player's RC3 release (the issue was around for RC1&amp;2 as well, but I reported it during RC3).
It was acknowledged, and confirmed by another user.
RC4 got released, I bumped the thread saying the problem still existed in RC4.
Now VLC 1.0 has been released, and the issue still stands.
It's a problem with WMV's audio skipping/glitching up.
It's not a complaint about VLC.
VLC is really great.
It's just really about practices of software releases that seem to be
getting worse and worse lately.
Rushing through the beta phase, and ignoring pretty big functionality problems just to get
a new release out in time.
I understand these guys are usually not getting paid for their work, but it makes more sense to make
good solid releases rather than just releasing, and then patching a few weeks later.
Having said that, VLC's newest release does fix major gripes I've had with the previous versions of the application, and I look forward to new releases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616231</id>
	<title>Re:Media player classic + codec packs VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246973760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the fact that it will play most anything. But...that's about it.</p><p>I was a continual user of VLC 0.8xxx but since they released the 1.0 crap they screwed up subtitles. I used to watch<br>movies with my Korean wife - her English is not terribly good - but now Korean subtitles are completely broken<br>with VLC.   I've put message out on their forum, but their team doesn't seem to give crap if something is broken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the fact that it will play most anything .
But...that 's about it.I was a continual user of VLC 0.8xxx but since they released the 1.0 crap they screwed up subtitles .
I used to watchmovies with my Korean wife - her English is not terribly good - but now Korean subtitles are completely brokenwith VLC .
I 've put message out on their forum , but their team does n't seem to give crap if something is broken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the fact that it will play most anything.
But...that's about it.I was a continual user of VLC 0.8xxx but since they released the 1.0 crap they screwed up subtitles.
I used to watchmovies with my Korean wife - her English is not terribly good - but now Korean subtitles are completely brokenwith VLC.
I've put message out on their forum, but their team doesn't seem to give crap if something is broken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617191</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1246982280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only thing I've never figured out how to do is rewind. I have to settle for clicking on the bar or using Shift/Ctrl/Alt + Left Arrow. More advanced functions such as fullscreen, alternate audio tracks and subtitles are usually unnecessary but are in the menus if you need them (or 'f', 'b', and 'v', respectively).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing I 've never figured out how to do is rewind .
I have to settle for clicking on the bar or using Shift/Ctrl/Alt + Left Arrow .
More advanced functions such as fullscreen , alternate audio tracks and subtitles are usually unnecessary but are in the menus if you need them ( or 'f ' , 'b ' , and 'v ' , respectively ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing I've never figured out how to do is rewind.
I have to settle for clicking on the bar or using Shift/Ctrl/Alt + Left Arrow.
More advanced functions such as fullscreen, alternate audio tracks and subtitles are usually unnecessary but are in the menus if you need them (or 'f', 'b', and 'v', respectively).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608151</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>Wooky\_linuxer</author>
	<datestamp>1246981620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if there isn't any copy protection mechanism that breaks the player. I once tried to rip a Wall-E DVD and it appeared to have over 60GB in it. They are using false sectors in the disk to fool rippers. Perhaps these DVDs you tried to watch have some similar "feature" that messes up the Linux software. You could try playing the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.vob files directly as a workaround.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there is n't any copy protection mechanism that breaks the player .
I once tried to rip a Wall-E DVD and it appeared to have over 60GB in it .
They are using false sectors in the disk to fool rippers .
Perhaps these DVDs you tried to watch have some similar " feature " that messes up the Linux software .
You could try playing the .vob files directly as a workaround .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there isn't any copy protection mechanism that breaks the player.
I once tried to rip a Wall-E DVD and it appeared to have over 60GB in it.
They are using false sectors in the disk to fool rippers.
Perhaps these DVDs you tried to watch have some similar "feature" that messes up the Linux software.
You could try playing the .vob files directly as a workaround.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610529</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, I think you need to look a little harder.</p><p>VLC supports CC on Linux and OSX.</p><p>xine supports CC but you have to manually add the settings to your xine config closed caption (search for "subtitles.closedcaption" options).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , I think you need to look a little harder.VLC supports CC on Linux and OSX.xine supports CC but you have to manually add the settings to your xine config closed caption ( search for " subtitles.closedcaption " options ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, I think you need to look a little harder.VLC supports CC on Linux and OSX.xine supports CC but you have to manually add the settings to your xine config closed caption (search for "subtitles.closedcaption" options).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608847</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if only the window didn't resize as I jump from movie to movie, it would be the ultimate porn viewing app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if only the window did n't resize as I jump from movie to movie , it would be the ultimate porn viewing app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if only the window didn't resize as I jump from movie to movie, it would be the ultimate porn viewing app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869</id>
	<title>Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1246980420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If anyone has tried this and played around with its menu support I'd love to hear about it.  I have several newer DVD's that won't play on VLC, Ogle, or mplayer.  Oh, they'll play: the stupid previews, the trailers, the additional material.  But the intro screen with a menu item that says 'play movie', crashes any of them when I try to actually play the movie.  This is happening on a brand-new copy of Stardust and another of Letters from Iwo Jima, and it's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate, who both say "if it can't play a DVD, I'm not using it".
Sigh</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone has tried this and played around with its menu support I 'd love to hear about it .
I have several newer DVD 's that wo n't play on VLC , Ogle , or mplayer .
Oh , they 'll play : the stupid previews , the trailers , the additional material .
But the intro screen with a menu item that says 'play movie ' , crashes any of them when I try to actually play the movie .
This is happening on a brand-new copy of Stardust and another of Letters from Iwo Jima , and it 's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate , who both say " if it ca n't play a DVD , I 'm not using it " .
Sigh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone has tried this and played around with its menu support I'd love to hear about it.
I have several newer DVD's that won't play on VLC, Ogle, or mplayer.
Oh, they'll play: the stupid previews, the trailers, the additional material.
But the intro screen with a menu item that says 'play movie', crashes any of them when I try to actually play the movie.
This is happening on a brand-new copy of Stardust and another of Letters from Iwo Jima, and it's making my linux sell really difficult for my girlfriend and my roommate, who both say "if it can't play a DVD, I'm not using it".
Sigh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609723</id>
	<title>Re:Does it now play DVDs with "piracy" warnings?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246987620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I've had this issue.  Selecting DVD Menu via the Playback menu (Title submenu) jumps to the menu, however, so it's only a minor issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I 've had this issue .
Selecting DVD Menu via the Playback menu ( Title submenu ) jumps to the menu , however , so it 's only a minor issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I've had this issue.
Selecting DVD Menu via the Playback menu (Title submenu) jumps to the menu, however, so it's only a minor issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612063</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>silverspell</author>
	<datestamp>1246996680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The end of support for Tiger was mentioned in a poll on the VLC forums a while back (down for some reason, so here's a <a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:TU7BWWSs25QJ:forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php\%3Ff\%3D12\%26t\%3D55638" title="74.125.95.132" rel="nofollow">Google cache copy</a> [74.125.95.132]).  The announcement was handled in a fairly tactless way, actually:<blockquote><div><p>We are trying to build a world-class modern media performance and streaming framework, and that excludes limitting ourselves to the lowest common denominator of all operating systems.

I am sure we will get our share of whining with this proposal, especially if it is implemented. Let it be known that I do not care. When millions of people use your software, whining users are a more often than daily occurence, no matter how excellent/crappy your software may be.  You simply cannot satisfy everyone, especially when your project is constrained by the time and motivation of a few core open-source developpers.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I don't know about you, but when I see attitude like this from a developer, my reaction isn't "Gee, this is a project which I hope succeeds, and which I want to support."  Which is a shame, because VLC is a good project, but has been undermined on more than one occasion by tactless developers.  Why needlessly alienate people?  One could just as easily have said --<br> <br>

"Unfortunately, we don't have any resources to continue supporting 10.4.x, so the only way to reinstate Tiger support would be working, user-contributed patches to bring the Tiger version up to speed."<br> <br>

But I guess that wouldn't have put the hungry, grasping, whining lusers in their place, eh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The end of support for Tiger was mentioned in a poll on the VLC forums a while back ( down for some reason , so here 's a Google cache copy [ 74.125.95.132 ] ) .
The announcement was handled in a fairly tactless way , actually : We are trying to build a world-class modern media performance and streaming framework , and that excludes limitting ourselves to the lowest common denominator of all operating systems .
I am sure we will get our share of whining with this proposal , especially if it is implemented .
Let it be known that I do not care .
When millions of people use your software , whining users are a more often than daily occurence , no matter how excellent/crappy your software may be .
You simply can not satisfy everyone , especially when your project is constrained by the time and motivation of a few core open-source developpers .
I do n't know about you , but when I see attitude like this from a developer , my reaction is n't " Gee , this is a project which I hope succeeds , and which I want to support .
" Which is a shame , because VLC is a good project , but has been undermined on more than one occasion by tactless developers .
Why needlessly alienate people ?
One could just as easily have said -- " Unfortunately , we do n't have any resources to continue supporting 10.4.x , so the only way to reinstate Tiger support would be working , user-contributed patches to bring the Tiger version up to speed .
" But I guess that would n't have put the hungry , grasping , whining lusers in their place , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The end of support for Tiger was mentioned in a poll on the VLC forums a while back (down for some reason, so here's a Google cache copy [74.125.95.132]).
The announcement was handled in a fairly tactless way, actually:We are trying to build a world-class modern media performance and streaming framework, and that excludes limitting ourselves to the lowest common denominator of all operating systems.
I am sure we will get our share of whining with this proposal, especially if it is implemented.
Let it be known that I do not care.
When millions of people use your software, whining users are a more often than daily occurence, no matter how excellent/crappy your software may be.
You simply cannot satisfy everyone, especially when your project is constrained by the time and motivation of a few core open-source developpers.
I don't know about you, but when I see attitude like this from a developer, my reaction isn't "Gee, this is a project which I hope succeeds, and which I want to support.
"  Which is a shame, because VLC is a good project, but has been undermined on more than one occasion by tactless developers.
Why needlessly alienate people?
One could just as easily have said -- 

"Unfortunately, we don't have any resources to continue supporting 10.4.x, so the only way to reinstate Tiger support would be working, user-contributed patches to bring the Tiger version up to speed.
" 

But I guess that wouldn't have put the hungry, grasping, whining lusers in their place, eh?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617427</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if Linus Torvalds has a license:<br><a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show\_bug.cgi?id=439858" title="redhat.com" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show\_bug.cgi?id=439858</a> [redhat.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if Linus Torvalds has a license : https : //bugzilla.redhat.com/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 439858 [ redhat.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if Linus Torvalds has a license:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show\_bug.cgi?id=439858 [redhat.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609839</id>
	<title>Re:cutting edge</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246988100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I could be wrong, but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine.</p></div><p>Applications should not support multiple cores. This function should be solely the domain of the OS itself.</p><p>While applications can be written or compiled to facilitate multi-processor use, the actual task of loading the process onto the different cores (or virtual machines, or even physical machines) should be 100\% transparent at the application layer.</p><p>Some things your application should not have to support include (but not limited to)<br>- Multiple Cores<br>- Storage devices<br>- Network Cards<br>- RAM<br>- BIOS</p><p>The list goes on. It's Window's job to utilize the cores, the memory, and the rest of the hardware resources, so stop bitching about the app developers, it's not their fault, and I would take severe issue with a high level app trying to take over the OS functions at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could be wrong , but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine.Applications should not support multiple cores .
This function should be solely the domain of the OS itself.While applications can be written or compiled to facilitate multi-processor use , the actual task of loading the process onto the different cores ( or virtual machines , or even physical machines ) should be 100 \ % transparent at the application layer.Some things your application should not have to support include ( but not limited to ) - Multiple Cores- Storage devices- Network Cards- RAM- BIOSThe list goes on .
It 's Window 's job to utilize the cores , the memory , and the rest of the hardware resources , so stop bitching about the app developers , it 's not their fault , and I would take severe issue with a high level app trying to take over the OS functions at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could be wrong, but I dont see any notes about this supporting multiple cores ona windows machine.Applications should not support multiple cores.
This function should be solely the domain of the OS itself.While applications can be written or compiled to facilitate multi-processor use, the actual task of loading the process onto the different cores (or virtual machines, or even physical machines) should be 100\% transparent at the application layer.Some things your application should not have to support include (but not limited to)- Multiple Cores- Storage devices- Network Cards- RAM- BIOSThe list goes on.
It's Window's job to utilize the cores, the memory, and the rest of the hardware resources, so stop bitching about the app developers, it's not their fault, and I would take severe issue with a high level app trying to take over the OS functions at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609609</id>
	<title>Re:Does not work on Mac OS X 10.4</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246987140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for heads up. What a waste!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for heads up .
What a waste !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for heads up.
What a waste!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611013</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246992720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To borrow a phrase from MichaelJanet Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</p></div><p>You insensitive cultural barbarian.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To borrow a phrase from MichaelJanet Jackson.. What have you done for me lately ? You insensitive cultural barbarian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To borrow a phrase from MichaelJanet Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?You insensitive cultural barbarian.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608023</id>
	<title>Pause / subtitle function</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246980960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about being able to pause with a single click somewhere on the movie or being able to but subtitles below the movie for wide screen movies on a non wide screen display?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about being able to pause with a single click somewhere on the movie or being able to but subtitles below the movie for wide screen movies on a non wide screen display ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about being able to pause with a single click somewhere on the movie or being able to but subtitles below the movie for wide screen movies on a non wide screen display?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613211</id>
	<title>Re:Zipped file playback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246958100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"serious media centers"? Excuse me, but what the fuck are you talking about? Serious media centers use gigabytes or terabytes of raw uncompressed video, they certainly wouldn't be using Xvid and RAR crap.</p><p>Like others have said, you're talking about films that you've pirated. That is the only place you would ever see a multi-part RAR archive of video files, because the people putting them up are morons and don't realise that the video is already compressed nor do they realise that Bittorrent already downloads in chunks, performs CRC and can be paused, stopped or resumed at any time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" serious media centers " ?
Excuse me , but what the fuck are you talking about ?
Serious media centers use gigabytes or terabytes of raw uncompressed video , they certainly would n't be using Xvid and RAR crap.Like others have said , you 're talking about films that you 've pirated .
That is the only place you would ever see a multi-part RAR archive of video files , because the people putting them up are morons and do n't realise that the video is already compressed nor do they realise that Bittorrent already downloads in chunks , performs CRC and can be paused , stopped or resumed at any time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"serious media centers"?
Excuse me, but what the fuck are you talking about?
Serious media centers use gigabytes or terabytes of raw uncompressed video, they certainly wouldn't be using Xvid and RAR crap.Like others have said, you're talking about films that you've pirated.
That is the only place you would ever see a multi-part RAR archive of video files, because the people putting them up are morons and don't realise that the video is already compressed nor do they realise that Bittorrent already downloads in chunks, performs CRC and can be paused, stopped or resumed at any time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341</id>
	<title>Media player classic +  codec packs  VLC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246982280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.</p><p>VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>VLC has shitty subtitle support , why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none , with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>VLC has shitty subtitle support, why VLC gets accolades is beyond me when there are so many bugs compared to just downloading one of the many great community made codec packs and media player classic.VLC is jack of all trades master of none, with weird bugs when you want to play subtitled files.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615975</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246971600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's never stopped the RIAA, so why should it stop the MPAA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's never stopped the RIAA , so why should it stop the MPAA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's never stopped the RIAA, so why should it stop the MPAA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611761</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>tirefire</author>
	<datestamp>1246995480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This plan would work well with:</p><p>1.  Lawyers.</p><p>2.  Completely perfect individuals.</p><p>This plan would not work well with:</p><p>1.  Everyone else.</p><p>Most people have to take what they can get when it comes to friends.  They've got some good points and some bad points.  One thing friends start to do after a while is depend on each other somewhat for expertise.  I'll fix your computer virus problem if you'll help me figure out what's making this weird noise in my car, etc.  Involving money unnecessarily in a friendship like that is a good way to make it fade away.</p><p>If you're really not willing to help your friend when he asks you, the problem is that the friend is either too needy or you're too stingy, or both.  But adding money to the picture (especially such petty amounts... $5?  You wouldn't just let a friend HAVE five dollars?) doesn't do anything about the root problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This plan would work well with : 1 .
Lawyers.2. Completely perfect individuals.This plan would not work well with : 1 .
Everyone else.Most people have to take what they can get when it comes to friends .
They 've got some good points and some bad points .
One thing friends start to do after a while is depend on each other somewhat for expertise .
I 'll fix your computer virus problem if you 'll help me figure out what 's making this weird noise in my car , etc .
Involving money unnecessarily in a friendship like that is a good way to make it fade away.If you 're really not willing to help your friend when he asks you , the problem is that the friend is either too needy or you 're too stingy , or both .
But adding money to the picture ( especially such petty amounts... $ 5 ? You would n't just let a friend HAVE five dollars ?
) does n't do anything about the root problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This plan would work well with:1.
Lawyers.2.  Completely perfect individuals.This plan would not work well with:1.
Everyone else.Most people have to take what they can get when it comes to friends.
They've got some good points and some bad points.
One thing friends start to do after a while is depend on each other somewhat for expertise.
I'll fix your computer virus problem if you'll help me figure out what's making this weird noise in my car, etc.
Involving money unnecessarily in a friendship like that is a good way to make it fade away.If you're really not willing to help your friend when he asks you, the problem is that the friend is either too needy or you're too stingy, or both.
But adding money to the picture (especially such petty amounts... $5?  You wouldn't just let a friend HAVE five dollars?
) doesn't do anything about the root problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609379</id>
	<title>NOOOOOOO!!!! :(</title>
	<author>solios</author>
	<datestamp>1246986300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been using a G4 dual 450 for SD playback for the past several years... now I'm gonna have to upgrade!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-|</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using a G4 dual 450 for SD playback for the past several years... now I 'm gon na have to upgrade !
: - |</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using a G4 dual 450 for SD playback for the past several years... now I'm gonna have to upgrade!
:-|</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616801</id>
	<title>Re:VLC media player and MPEG-2</title>
	<author>PiSkyHi</author>
	<datestamp>1246978200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nooo...body expects the MPAA!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nooo...body expects the MPAA !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nooo...body expects the MPAA!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>ByOhTek</author>
	<datestamp>1246981080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.</p><p>No matter what OS I'm on, I always seem to use one app for audio, and one app for video. What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video, and vice-versa. I've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type.</p><p>Heck, in FreeBSD, I usually have three video apps (noatun, vlc and mplayer) because none of them works well on everything, but at least one will work for whatever I watch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have a dozen tools , each of which excells at it 's one thing , than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.No matter what OS I 'm on , I always seem to use one app for audio , and one app for video .
What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video , and vice-versa .
I 've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type.Heck , in FreeBSD , I usually have three video apps ( noatun , vlc and mplayer ) because none of them works well on everything , but at least one will work for whatever I watch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have a dozen tools, each of which excells at it's one thing, than one tool that does a half-assed job at a dozen things.No matter what OS I'm on, I always seem to use one app for audio, and one app for video.
What constitutes a clean and useful interface for audio rarely does for video, and vice-versa.
I've yet to see an app that auto-switches on media type.Heck, in FreeBSD, I usually have three video apps (noatun, vlc and mplayer) because none of them works well on everything, but at least one will work for whatever I watch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616127</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246972980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Closed Captioning is a north american specific way of encoding captions into a TV signal (and is specific to NTSC).  There is also a standard for embedding this into an MPEG-2 stream so that a tradtional DVD player will generate them on the outgoing composite or RF feed, and there is a standard for embedding this into the ATSC digital TV standard as well.  Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD support(ed) this particular standard, as they aim at HDMI which cannot carry this particular standard.  These signals are decoded by the TV, generated into characters and superimposed over the image by the TV.  I think US style Closed Captioning can be recorded onto VHS as it's just another line of data.</p><p>In New Zealand, which I think is the same as Europe, for tratidional over-the-air, they use the Teletext standard which allows for both full page data (an information service) and partial overlays (used for subtitles/captions) superimposed over the image by the TV if the TV supports teletext (not all do.).   For DVDs, then the captions are carried on a subtitle stream which is superimposed onto the image by the DVD player.   THis is the same mechanism used by Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.</p><p>Very few VHS decks can record Teletext and Teletext based subtitles.  I don't know what Europe is doing with digital TV subtitles/captions though.</p><p>Long story short: Closed Captioning is a specific captioning technlogy and standard used in the USA.  It's not the only technlogy for displaying subtitles or captions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Closed Captioning is a north american specific way of encoding captions into a TV signal ( and is specific to NTSC ) .
There is also a standard for embedding this into an MPEG-2 stream so that a tradtional DVD player will generate them on the outgoing composite or RF feed , and there is a standard for embedding this into the ATSC digital TV standard as well .
Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD support ( ed ) this particular standard , as they aim at HDMI which can not carry this particular standard .
These signals are decoded by the TV , generated into characters and superimposed over the image by the TV .
I think US style Closed Captioning can be recorded onto VHS as it 's just another line of data.In New Zealand , which I think is the same as Europe , for tratidional over-the-air , they use the Teletext standard which allows for both full page data ( an information service ) and partial overlays ( used for subtitles/captions ) superimposed over the image by the TV if the TV supports teletext ( not all do. ) .
For DVDs , then the captions are carried on a subtitle stream which is superimposed onto the image by the DVD player .
THis is the same mechanism used by Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.Very few VHS decks can record Teletext and Teletext based subtitles .
I do n't know what Europe is doing with digital TV subtitles/captions though.Long story short : Closed Captioning is a specific captioning technlogy and standard used in the USA .
It 's not the only technlogy for displaying subtitles or captions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Closed Captioning is a north american specific way of encoding captions into a TV signal (and is specific to NTSC).
There is also a standard for embedding this into an MPEG-2 stream so that a tradtional DVD player will generate them on the outgoing composite or RF feed, and there is a standard for embedding this into the ATSC digital TV standard as well.
Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD support(ed) this particular standard, as they aim at HDMI which cannot carry this particular standard.
These signals are decoded by the TV, generated into characters and superimposed over the image by the TV.
I think US style Closed Captioning can be recorded onto VHS as it's just another line of data.In New Zealand, which I think is the same as Europe, for tratidional over-the-air, they use the Teletext standard which allows for both full page data (an information service) and partial overlays (used for subtitles/captions) superimposed over the image by the TV if the TV supports teletext (not all do.).
For DVDs, then the captions are carried on a subtitle stream which is superimposed onto the image by the DVD player.
THis is the same mechanism used by Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.Very few VHS decks can record Teletext and Teletext based subtitles.
I don't know what Europe is doing with digital TV subtitles/captions though.Long story short: Closed Captioning is a specific captioning technlogy and standard used in the USA.
It's not the only technlogy for displaying subtitles or captions!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617447</id>
	<title>Re:So it plays back media</title>
	<author>extra88</author>
	<datestamp>1246984800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?</p></div><p>That's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What\_Have\_You\_Done\_for\_Me\_Lately" title="wikipedia.org">Janet!</a> [wikipedia.org] Miss Jackson if you're nasty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately ? That 's Janet !
[ wikipedia.org ] Miss Jackson if you 're nasty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To borrow a phrase from Michael Jackson.. What have you done for me lately?That's Janet!
[wikipedia.org] Miss Jackson if you're nasty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614437</id>
	<title>Re:Instant Pausing, Frame By Frame</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1246962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know if that was meant to be tongue in cheek, but terrible seeking control is one of the reasons I never used VLC; it's very frustrating, even in non-porn situations.
<br> <br>
Actually, the whole UI in VLC leaves a lot to be desired: it's oddly unresponsive, has the classic OS approach to design called "randomly pile as many options as possible into arbitrary menus", and is pretty damn unattractive.
<br> <br>
Meh, to each their own, I guess.  I like Media Player Classic - simple and fast, what more would you want?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if that was meant to be tongue in cheek , but terrible seeking control is one of the reasons I never used VLC ; it 's very frustrating , even in non-porn situations .
Actually , the whole UI in VLC leaves a lot to be desired : it 's oddly unresponsive , has the classic OS approach to design called " randomly pile as many options as possible into arbitrary menus " , and is pretty damn unattractive .
Meh , to each their own , I guess .
I like Media Player Classic - simple and fast , what more would you want ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if that was meant to be tongue in cheek, but terrible seeking control is one of the reasons I never used VLC; it's very frustrating, even in non-porn situations.
Actually, the whole UI in VLC leaves a lot to be desired: it's oddly unresponsive, has the classic OS approach to design called "randomly pile as many options as possible into arbitrary menus", and is pretty damn unattractive.
Meh, to each their own, I guess.
I like Media Player Classic - simple and fast, what more would you want?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615411</id>
	<title>Re:Sticking with mplayer, thank you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246967820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well... given that non-USA people have usually been ignored by the USA, fair's fair!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)  Yes, it is some american thing, of zero value to anyone that isn't playing an NTSC DVD so it is of somewhat limited value.</p><p>Anyway, judging by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed\_captioning, it's not surprising that it's not emulated.  Only NTSC DVDs carry them.  (Line 21 in PAL is just part of the picture as we have more lines.)  Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD carry them.  (PAL DVDs often just have two subtitle tracks, "English" and "English for the Hearing Impared.")</p><p>The curious thing about them is they appear to be encoded as text (rather than DVD subtitle streams, which are actually bitmaps).  On a traditional DVD / TV  combo, they're decoded by the TV, not the DVD player.  Wouldn't be too difficult to decode them, on par with rendering on alternate subtitle files on top of the video and extracting out the extra data stream from the MPEG-2 data..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... given that non-USA people have usually been ignored by the USA , fair 's fair !
: - ) Yes , it is some american thing , of zero value to anyone that is n't playing an NTSC DVD so it is of somewhat limited value.Anyway , judging by http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed \ _captioning , it 's not surprising that it 's not emulated .
Only NTSC DVDs carry them .
( Line 21 in PAL is just part of the picture as we have more lines .
) Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD carry them .
( PAL DVDs often just have two subtitle tracks , " English " and " English for the Hearing Impared .
" ) The curious thing about them is they appear to be encoded as text ( rather than DVD subtitle streams , which are actually bitmaps ) .
On a traditional DVD / TV combo , they 're decoded by the TV , not the DVD player .
Would n't be too difficult to decode them , on par with rendering on alternate subtitle files on top of the video and extracting out the extra data stream from the MPEG-2 data. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... given that non-USA people have usually been ignored by the USA, fair's fair!
:-)  Yes, it is some american thing, of zero value to anyone that isn't playing an NTSC DVD so it is of somewhat limited value.Anyway, judging by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed\_captioning, it's not surprising that it's not emulated.
Only NTSC DVDs carry them.
(Line 21 in PAL is just part of the picture as we have more lines.
)  Neither Blu-Ray nor HD-DVD carry them.
(PAL DVDs often just have two subtitle tracks, "English" and "English for the Hearing Impared.
")The curious thing about them is they appear to be encoded as text (rather than DVD subtitle streams, which are actually bitmaps).
On a traditional DVD / TV  combo, they're decoded by the TV, not the DVD player.
Wouldn't be too difficult to decode them, on par with rendering on alternate subtitle files on top of the video and extracting out the extra data stream from the MPEG-2 data..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616825</id>
	<title>Re:Better DVD menu support?</title>
	<author>PiSkyHi</author>
	<datestamp>1246978380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If everyone had the attitude of "If it doesn't do what I want, I'm not using it." there would be no software for you to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone had the attitude of " If it does n't do what I want , I 'm not using it .
" there would be no software for you to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone had the attitude of "If it doesn't do what I want, I'm not using it.
" there would be no software for you to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610169</id>
	<title>AC3/DTS passthrough in windows?</title>
	<author>guidryp</author>
	<datestamp>1246989480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema. So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.</p><p>VLC I can't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all (never could on any version) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.</p><p>On MPC HC I can get some tracks to passthrough, but the on 1080 MKVs it produces jerky video (while using almost no CPU). It might be the renderer but I needed an advanced one to all the change from 0-255 to 16-235 gamma levels or something like that. Without this, blacks are gray.</p><p>In short I want a decent windows player that will:</p><p>Play DTS/DD soundtracks with proper passthrough to my Denon receiver.<br>Play high res without frame skipping/jitter (MPC HC)<br>Allow gamma adjustment to get black blacks...</p><p>Maybe I have to go back to the old MPC and codec packs???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema .
So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.VLC I ca n't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all ( never could on any version ) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.On MPC HC I can get some tracks to passthrough , but the on 1080 MKVs it produces jerky video ( while using almost no CPU ) .
It might be the renderer but I needed an advanced one to all the change from 0-255 to 16-235 gamma levels or something like that .
Without this , blacks are gray.In short I want a decent windows player that will : Play DTS/DD soundtracks with proper passthrough to my Denon receiver.Play high res without frame skipping/jitter ( MPC HC ) Allow gamma adjustment to get black blacks...Maybe I have to go back to the old MPC and codec packs ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the last update VLC update cycle people talked up MPC Home Cinema.
So I cleaned out all my old players and codecs and started over with VLC and MPC HC.VLC I can't get DD/DTS passthrough working with at all (never could on any version) it just gets stuck repeatedly playing a sample.On MPC HC I can get some tracks to passthrough, but the on 1080 MKVs it produces jerky video (while using almost no CPU).
It might be the renderer but I needed an advanced one to all the change from 0-255 to 16-235 gamma levels or something like that.
Without this, blacks are gray.In short I want a decent windows player that will:Play DTS/DD soundtracks with proper passthrough to my Denon receiver.Play high res without frame skipping/jitter (MPC HC)Allow gamma adjustment to get black blacks...Maybe I have to go back to the old MPC and codec packs??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608919</id>
	<title>Playlist</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246984500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who usually listens to music as entire albums, the playlist has a great feature. The playlist can be displayed as a tree. This is disabled by default, but can be enabled in the preferences. It is nice to drag folders onto the playlist and see the songs for each album grouped together.</p><p>Unfortunately, I can't see any way to reorder this list. When I try dragging items around, I end up putting one album folder inside another, rather than reordering them.</p><p>Also, it would be really nice if there was a way to have the playlist and the controls in a single window. I don't need two VLC items on my task bar. If I bring up the playlist, I usually want to view the controls as well, so I'd really prefer it all in one window.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who usually listens to music as entire albums , the playlist has a great feature .
The playlist can be displayed as a tree .
This is disabled by default , but can be enabled in the preferences .
It is nice to drag folders onto the playlist and see the songs for each album grouped together.Unfortunately , I ca n't see any way to reorder this list .
When I try dragging items around , I end up putting one album folder inside another , rather than reordering them.Also , it would be really nice if there was a way to have the playlist and the controls in a single window .
I do n't need two VLC items on my task bar .
If I bring up the playlist , I usually want to view the controls as well , so I 'd really prefer it all in one window .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who usually listens to music as entire albums, the playlist has a great feature.
The playlist can be displayed as a tree.
This is disabled by default, but can be enabled in the preferences.
It is nice to drag folders onto the playlist and see the songs for each album grouped together.Unfortunately, I can't see any way to reorder this list.
When I try dragging items around, I end up putting one album folder inside another, rather than reordering them.Also, it would be really nice if there was a way to have the playlist and the controls in a single window.
I don't need two VLC items on my task bar.
If I bring up the playlist, I usually want to view the controls as well, so I'd really prefer it all in one window.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608829</id>
	<title>Best way to upgrade? (or Videolan's website sucks)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246984140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Checking for updates from VLC 0.9.9 reports that I have the latest version.  I figured I'd visit Videolan's site and see what the release notes said about upgrading, but I can't find any release notes.  So I tried checking the FAQ, wiki, and forums.  The FAQ doesn't cover upgrading from 0.9.9 to 1.0.0, and the wiki and forum links just seem to return you to the VLC main page.  I'm downloading 1.0.0 now.  I'll probably end up uninstalling 0.9.9 and installing 1.0.0, but it sure would be nice if the "check for updates" functionality worked.  And it would be nice if the wiki and forums worked, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Checking for updates from VLC 0.9.9 reports that I have the latest version .
I figured I 'd visit Videolan 's site and see what the release notes said about upgrading , but I ca n't find any release notes .
So I tried checking the FAQ , wiki , and forums .
The FAQ does n't cover upgrading from 0.9.9 to 1.0.0 , and the wiki and forum links just seem to return you to the VLC main page .
I 'm downloading 1.0.0 now .
I 'll probably end up uninstalling 0.9.9 and installing 1.0.0 , but it sure would be nice if the " check for updates " functionality worked .
And it would be nice if the wiki and forums worked , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Checking for updates from VLC 0.9.9 reports that I have the latest version.
I figured I'd visit Videolan's site and see what the release notes said about upgrading, but I can't find any release notes.
So I tried checking the FAQ, wiki, and forums.
The FAQ doesn't cover upgrading from 0.9.9 to 1.0.0, and the wiki and forum links just seem to return you to the VLC main page.
I'm downloading 1.0.0 now.
I'll probably end up uninstalling 0.9.9 and installing 1.0.0, but it sure would be nice if the "check for updates" functionality worked.
And it would be nice if the wiki and forums worked, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28622887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28629581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28742941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615411
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28730035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28628089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_1357237_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608039
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607965
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608055
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617427
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615975
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607883
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608187
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618565
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608945
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613789
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610821
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611761
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609613
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616825
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608523
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609063
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611691
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612907
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609547
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609479
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613247
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609365
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611111
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608969
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616231
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610535
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608669
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28628089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608821
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609375
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610699
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611155
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617405
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28618157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28742941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607739
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28629581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28613211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28615729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28619045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611613
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608207
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609723
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608239
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28616579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611407
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608463
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28612231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607939
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28614105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611473
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609229
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609773
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28622887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608963
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617191
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28730035
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610879
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608357
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28611701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_1357237.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28607795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608053
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28610295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28617705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28608839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_1357237.28609149
</commentlist>
</conversation>
