<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_07_0024224</id>
	<title><em>Don't Copy That Floppy!</em> Gets a Sequel</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246977600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:theodp@aol.com" rel="nofollow">theodp</a> writes <i>"Back in 1992, the <a href="http://www.siia.net/">SIIA</a> released <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up863eQKGUI">Don't Copy That Floppy!</a>, a goofy video in which anti-piracy rapper <a href="http://www.siia.net/components/com\_fpss/images/c1\_dct2\_1\_1.jpg">MC Double Def DP</a> convinces a young lad not to copy a game by appealing to his sense of right and wrong. Now, to address what it calls 'new generations and new temptations,' the SIIA has uploaded a trailer for a new anti-piracy rap video &mdash; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHaAFqoVLtI">Don't Copy That 2</a> &mdash; that will be released this summer. To underscore the video's it's-not-just-a-copy-it's-a-crime message, the new film is a tad darker than the original. A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs. The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell (<a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2499/3692656549\_96126c04f1.jpg">image summarizing his plight</a>)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Back in 1992 , the SIIA released Do n't Copy That Floppy ! , a goofy video in which anti-piracy rapper MC Double Def DP convinces a young lad not to copy a game by appealing to his sense of right and wrong .
Now , to address what it calls 'new generations and new temptations, ' the SIIA has uploaded a trailer for a new anti-piracy rap video    Do n't Copy That 2    that will be released this summer .
To underscore the video 's it 's-not-just-a-copy-it 's-a-crime message , the new film is a tad darker than the original .
A smug teen who 's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace ' and 'Tune Weasel ' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs .
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him , physically attack him , and make him run for his life back to his jail cell ( image summarizing his plight ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Back in 1992, the SIIA released Don't Copy That Floppy!, a goofy video in which anti-piracy rapper MC Double Def DP convinces a young lad not to copy a game by appealing to his sense of right and wrong.
Now, to address what it calls 'new generations and new temptations,' the SIIA has uploaded a trailer for a new anti-piracy rap video — Don't Copy That 2 — that will be released this summer.
To underscore the video's it's-not-just-a-copy-it's-a-crime message, the new film is a tad darker than the original.
A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell (image summarizing his plight).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604435</id>
	<title>Wonder how much www.tuneweasle.org would cost</title>
	<author>LostMyBeaver</author>
	<datestamp>1246907760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the name. I want it. Tempting to setup a server in Antigua and get some trackers running.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the name .
I want it .
Tempting to setup a server in Antigua and get some trackers running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the name.
I want it.
Tempting to setup a server in Antigua and get some trackers running.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605837</id>
	<title>Re:Many, MANY inaccuracies in this video!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246968540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first thought came to my head was "Woah, isn't busting down the door with assault rifles in hand a little extreme?" And yet nobody else has mentioned it yet, so I guess not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thought came to my head was " Woah , is n't busting down the door with assault rifles in hand a little extreme ?
" And yet nobody else has mentioned it yet , so I guess not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thought came to my head was "Woah, isn't busting down the door with assault rifles in hand a little extreme?
" And yet nobody else has mentioned it yet, so I guess not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603491</id>
	<title>Sweet!</title>
	<author>dufachi</author>
	<datestamp>1246897380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are intimating that you can end up in Federal "Pound-You-In-The-Ass" Prison for making a dupe. Nice! The industry just needs to realize that it's free advertising and treat it as such instead of endorsing child rape.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are intimating that you can end up in Federal " Pound-You-In-The-Ass " Prison for making a dupe .
Nice ! The industry just needs to realize that it 's free advertising and treat it as such instead of endorsing child rape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are intimating that you can end up in Federal "Pound-You-In-The-Ass" Prison for making a dupe.
Nice! The industry just needs to realize that it's free advertising and treat it as such instead of endorsing child rape.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603757</id>
	<title>Obligitory Plug (Feel free to ignore)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246899240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Real operating systems come on torrents...and their organizers encourage you use them!</p><p>In Windows, as with the case of TCP/IP, it was a foreign body to Win95. Someone made "WinSock" and pirated the hell out of it, and later versions came as part of the OS as if it'd been there all the time.  Moral: Microsoft didn't invent the internet: Unix did.</p><p>Later, they decided to build it in, but they butchered the standard. Instead of following the standard agreed-upon by hundreds of vendors, they detected when an IIS  webserver was on the other end, and agreed to ignore the ACKs and NAKs.  This wasn't the only time they munged the standard to make them look better.  They also chewed up DHCP servers, because a Win95 host would KEEP TALKING AFTER IT LOST IT'S LEASE on an IP address.</p><p>So those parts have been thrown away, rebuilt, thrown away partly, given new logos, recompiled for marketing reasons and are as they are, today.</p><p>In Linux, TCP/IP was one of several standards adopted early on.  Sure, *very* early they probably threw something away, but the development model is more about "polishing the apple" over, and over, and over again.</p><p>When you do that, parts of the OS, probably like login.c (inspired and running years before Linux was created, then with one major change when PAM came in) have been patched and matured to the point they need no more fixing: they've beaten all the bugs. Login.c is one of 100,000 files on my machine at this moment- they're all being polished into leaner, stronger, better files every time someone files a bug report.</p><p>Windows can't possibly do this. Never mind the stolen code from Sybase (now called Access, and largely re-written) every release, they have to *pay* a cadre of people to build something which has huge chunks that are fresh and buggy.  Linux never does, and has an even larger audience to check for bugs, both before and after launch.</p><p>Where's this lead?</p><p>At some point, Microsoft won't be able to release a version more stable, or more bug-free than your garden-variety Linux. 20+ years later, and we're STILL fighting an ever-growing batch of malware of various kinds, we're STILL being told the new version will be stronger and we're STILL requiring a third-party program to help Windows make it through the day.  And sometimes that's not enough.</p><p>Cisco makes routers that make sense of the "Windows Networking" that seems to have never figured out how to leave a subnet.</p><p>Banks all over the world, flush-n-fill each and every PC in their employ every night because it's more likely to let them miss viruses.  They're real data is on non-Microsoft servers.  More and more, guess who that is?</p><p>So yeah...continue with that horse-n-buggy thinking that has scared real creative geniuses out of the PC marketplace for 15-20 years. Help along that product-liability suit or that cadre of stormtroopers who comes in looking for pirated software and leaves with a $100,000 check a month later, after bringing your business to a halt.</p><p>My operating system was made *on the internet*, programmed by fellows with compassion and vision. Won't you leave your horse and buggy world and try something new?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Real operating systems come on torrents...and their organizers encourage you use them ! In Windows , as with the case of TCP/IP , it was a foreign body to Win95 .
Someone made " WinSock " and pirated the hell out of it , and later versions came as part of the OS as if it 'd been there all the time .
Moral : Microsoft did n't invent the internet : Unix did.Later , they decided to build it in , but they butchered the standard .
Instead of following the standard agreed-upon by hundreds of vendors , they detected when an IIS webserver was on the other end , and agreed to ignore the ACKs and NAKs .
This was n't the only time they munged the standard to make them look better .
They also chewed up DHCP servers , because a Win95 host would KEEP TALKING AFTER IT LOST IT 'S LEASE on an IP address.So those parts have been thrown away , rebuilt , thrown away partly , given new logos , recompiled for marketing reasons and are as they are , today.In Linux , TCP/IP was one of several standards adopted early on .
Sure , * very * early they probably threw something away , but the development model is more about " polishing the apple " over , and over , and over again.When you do that , parts of the OS , probably like login.c ( inspired and running years before Linux was created , then with one major change when PAM came in ) have been patched and matured to the point they need no more fixing : they 've beaten all the bugs .
Login.c is one of 100,000 files on my machine at this moment- they 're all being polished into leaner , stronger , better files every time someone files a bug report.Windows ca n't possibly do this .
Never mind the stolen code from Sybase ( now called Access , and largely re-written ) every release , they have to * pay * a cadre of people to build something which has huge chunks that are fresh and buggy .
Linux never does , and has an even larger audience to check for bugs , both before and after launch.Where 's this lead ? At some point , Microsoft wo n't be able to release a version more stable , or more bug-free than your garden-variety Linux .
20 + years later , and we 're STILL fighting an ever-growing batch of malware of various kinds , we 're STILL being told the new version will be stronger and we 're STILL requiring a third-party program to help Windows make it through the day .
And sometimes that 's not enough.Cisco makes routers that make sense of the " Windows Networking " that seems to have never figured out how to leave a subnet.Banks all over the world , flush-n-fill each and every PC in their employ every night because it 's more likely to let them miss viruses .
They 're real data is on non-Microsoft servers .
More and more , guess who that is ? So yeah...continue with that horse-n-buggy thinking that has scared real creative geniuses out of the PC marketplace for 15-20 years .
Help along that product-liability suit or that cadre of stormtroopers who comes in looking for pirated software and leaves with a $ 100,000 check a month later , after bringing your business to a halt.My operating system was made * on the internet * , programmed by fellows with compassion and vision .
Wo n't you leave your horse and buggy world and try something new ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real operating systems come on torrents...and their organizers encourage you use them!In Windows, as with the case of TCP/IP, it was a foreign body to Win95.
Someone made "WinSock" and pirated the hell out of it, and later versions came as part of the OS as if it'd been there all the time.
Moral: Microsoft didn't invent the internet: Unix did.Later, they decided to build it in, but they butchered the standard.
Instead of following the standard agreed-upon by hundreds of vendors, they detected when an IIS  webserver was on the other end, and agreed to ignore the ACKs and NAKs.
This wasn't the only time they munged the standard to make them look better.
They also chewed up DHCP servers, because a Win95 host would KEEP TALKING AFTER IT LOST IT'S LEASE on an IP address.So those parts have been thrown away, rebuilt, thrown away partly, given new logos, recompiled for marketing reasons and are as they are, today.In Linux, TCP/IP was one of several standards adopted early on.
Sure, *very* early they probably threw something away, but the development model is more about "polishing the apple" over, and over, and over again.When you do that, parts of the OS, probably like login.c (inspired and running years before Linux was created, then with one major change when PAM came in) have been patched and matured to the point they need no more fixing: they've beaten all the bugs.
Login.c is one of 100,000 files on my machine at this moment- they're all being polished into leaner, stronger, better files every time someone files a bug report.Windows can't possibly do this.
Never mind the stolen code from Sybase (now called Access, and largely re-written) every release, they have to *pay* a cadre of people to build something which has huge chunks that are fresh and buggy.
Linux never does, and has an even larger audience to check for bugs, both before and after launch.Where's this lead?At some point, Microsoft won't be able to release a version more stable, or more bug-free than your garden-variety Linux.
20+ years later, and we're STILL fighting an ever-growing batch of malware of various kinds, we're STILL being told the new version will be stronger and we're STILL requiring a third-party program to help Windows make it through the day.
And sometimes that's not enough.Cisco makes routers that make sense of the "Windows Networking" that seems to have never figured out how to leave a subnet.Banks all over the world, flush-n-fill each and every PC in their employ every night because it's more likely to let them miss viruses.
They're real data is on non-Microsoft servers.
More and more, guess who that is?So yeah...continue with that horse-n-buggy thinking that has scared real creative geniuses out of the PC marketplace for 15-20 years.
Help along that product-liability suit or that cadre of stormtroopers who comes in looking for pirated software and leaves with a $100,000 check a month later, after bringing your business to a halt.My operating system was made *on the internet*, programmed by fellows with compassion and vision.
Won't you leave your horse and buggy world and try something new?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608259</id>
	<title>lol, meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if agents were to bust down your door and arrest you, computer crime such as stealing mp3's, applications, etc.. is classified as "Non-violent".  This means if you do have to do some jail time, you basically do it in a minimum security resort.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if agents were to bust down your door and arrest you , computer crime such as stealing mp3 's , applications , etc.. is classified as " Non-violent " .
This means if you do have to do some jail time , you basically do it in a minimum security resort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if agents were to bust down your door and arrest you, computer crime such as stealing mp3's, applications, etc.. is classified as "Non-violent".
This means if you do have to do some jail time, you basically do it in a minimum security resort.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604653</id>
	<title>Ethics in software?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246996860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For me the only ethics in software is being able to <b>share</b> it with your friends. Did your mother teach you nothing?</p><p>You know what is truely ethical?; Marking something and then sharing it with the rest of the world!</p><p>And the only thing that is truely attacking the digital age are the proprietary software vendors and the pro-copyright bodies.</p><p>Now get the fsck off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For me the only ethics in software is being able to share it with your friends .
Did your mother teach you nothing ? You know what is truely ethical ?
; Marking something and then sharing it with the rest of the world ! And the only thing that is truely attacking the digital age are the proprietary software vendors and the pro-copyright bodies.Now get the fsck off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me the only ethics in software is being able to share it with your friends.
Did your mother teach you nothing?You know what is truely ethical?
; Marking something and then sharing it with the rest of the world!And the only thing that is truely attacking the digital age are the proprietary software vendors and the pro-copyright bodies.Now get the fsck off my lawn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604587</id>
	<title>can't be legit</title>
	<author>socsoc</author>
	<datestamp>1246909560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>was this video made in 1990?</htmltext>
<tokenext>was this video made in 1990 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was this video made in 1990?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607805</id>
	<title>VHS Tape</title>
	<author>treytech</author>
	<datestamp>1246980180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have the Don't Copy That Floppy VHS tape in the original packaging if anyone wants to buy it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have the Do n't Copy That Floppy VHS tape in the original packaging if anyone wants to buy it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have the Don't Copy That Floppy VHS tape in the original packaging if anyone wants to buy it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605503</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1246963800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course it is; the police are paid for by the public purse so it would amount to having a massive government subsidy. What greedy industry wouldn't like that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it is ; the police are paid for by the public purse so it would amount to having a massive government subsidy .
What greedy industry would n't like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it is; the police are paid for by the public purse so it would amount to having a massive government subsidy.
What greedy industry wouldn't like that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608071</id>
	<title>Ironic, aint it.</title>
	<author>CJSchmidt</author>
	<datestamp>1246981260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that a rip-off Tardis interior I see (I guess they didn't want to pay for the rights)? Interesting that they choose a property which I got into by downloading (that was the only way to watch it at the time) and have since spent hundreds of dollars purchasing Doctor Who DVDs, CDs, books, and collectables.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that a rip-off Tardis interior I see ( I guess they did n't want to pay for the rights ) ?
Interesting that they choose a property which I got into by downloading ( that was the only way to watch it at the time ) and have since spent hundreds of dollars purchasing Doctor Who DVDs , CDs , books , and collectables .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that a rip-off Tardis interior I see (I guess they didn't want to pay for the rights)?
Interesting that they choose a property which I got into by downloading (that was the only way to watch it at the time) and have since spent hundreds of dollars purchasing Doctor Who DVDs, CDs, books, and collectables.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603363</id>
	<title>It should be a crime</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1246896360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To blatantly and deliberately mislead the public into believing something is a crime when it isn't.</p><p>"Production of propaganda with an intent to mislead" or something.</p><p>I bet it's already illegal in Germany.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To blatantly and deliberately mislead the public into believing something is a crime when it is n't .
" Production of propaganda with an intent to mislead " or something.I bet it 's already illegal in Germany .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>To blatantly and deliberately mislead the public into believing something is a crime when it isn't.
"Production of propaganda with an intent to mislead" or something.I bet it's already illegal in Germany.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603789</id>
	<title>This sounds familiar</title>
	<author>Boawk</author>
	<datestamp>1246899600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell</p></div></blockquote><p>
Sounds like an average day working tech support.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him , physically attack him , and make him run for his life back to his jail cell Sounds like an average day working tech support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell
Sounds like an average day working tech support.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271</id>
	<title>is the entertainment industry</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1246895760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>endorsing prison rape of children? Because that is what it looks like.

<a href="http://technoflak.blogspot.com/2009/04/conflating-free-speech-with-free-beer.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">There is a better way to fight software piracy.</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>endorsing prison rape of children ?
Because that is what it looks like .
There is a better way to fight software piracy .
[ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>endorsing prison rape of children?
Because that is what it looks like.
There is a better way to fight software piracy.
[blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604753</id>
	<title>Re:British TV</title>
	<author>omz13</author>
	<datestamp>1246997940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Forgive the youtube link, but a British TV show called "The IT Crowd" did a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALZZx1xmAzg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">pretty good anti-piracy warning.</a> [youtube.com]</p> </div><p>Its not an anti-piracy warning... its <b>satire</b> of the anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK. As satires go, its very funny is you know the original warning.

(And, to be blunt, one reason to rip your DVDs is to remove the very f*****g annoying anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK, especially as you can't skip through it, grrrrr. When I buy a DVD, I just want to watch its content, not get bombasted with crappy anti-piracy warnings and all the stupid trailers they are starting to add now).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forgive the youtube link , but a British TV show called " The IT Crowd " did a pretty good anti-piracy warning .
[ youtube.com ] Its not an anti-piracy warning... its satire of the anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK .
As satires go , its very funny is you know the original warning .
( And , to be blunt , one reason to rip your DVDs is to remove the very f * * * * * g annoying anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK , especially as you ca n't skip through it , grrrrr .
When I buy a DVD , I just want to watch its content , not get bombasted with crappy anti-piracy warnings and all the stupid trailers they are starting to add now ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forgive the youtube link, but a British TV show called "The IT Crowd" did a pretty good anti-piracy warning.
[youtube.com] Its not an anti-piracy warning... its satire of the anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK.
As satires go, its very funny is you know the original warning.
(And, to be blunt, one reason to rip your DVDs is to remove the very f*****g annoying anti-piracy warning that is shown at the start of DVDs sold in the UK, especially as you can't skip through it, grrrrr.
When I buy a DVD, I just want to watch its content, not get bombasted with crappy anti-piracy warnings and all the stupid trailers they are starting to add now).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606869</id>
	<title>Re:is the entertainment industry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246976400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I stopped reading then the article rampled about copying is stealing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I stopped reading then the article rampled about copying is stealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stopped reading then the article rampled about copying is stealing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606099</id>
	<title>Re:Many, MANY inaccuracies in this video!</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1246971480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2. ANIME ANGEL TATOOS? In an American prison??? I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...</p></div><p>Sure there are. What do you think they were illegally downloading, hm?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 .
ANIME ANGEL TATOOS ?
In an American prison ? ? ?
I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...Sure there are .
What do you think they were illegally downloading , hm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2.
ANIME ANGEL TATOOS?
In an American prison???
I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...Sure there are.
What do you think they were illegally downloading, hm?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604497</id>
	<title>Executive's fantasy</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1246908480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know this is a record company executive's fantasy of what should happen to everyone who downloads MP3s.  That's what this video is for: it's not for us, really.  You know him and his Ivy League buddies had a hearty laugh at the screening in his office, and then he said, "Put that out there where people can download it - for free!  Ha ha ha" and went back to torturing kittens or trading derivatives or whatever the fuck he does with his time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know this is a record company executive 's fantasy of what should happen to everyone who downloads MP3s .
That 's what this video is for : it 's not for us , really .
You know him and his Ivy League buddies had a hearty laugh at the screening in his office , and then he said , " Put that out there where people can download it - for free !
Ha ha ha " and went back to torturing kittens or trading derivatives or whatever the fuck he does with his time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know this is a record company executive's fantasy of what should happen to everyone who downloads MP3s.
That's what this video is for: it's not for us, really.
You know him and his Ivy League buddies had a hearty laugh at the screening in his office, and then he said, "Put that out there where people can download it - for free!
Ha ha ha" and went back to torturing kittens or trading derivatives or whatever the fuck he does with his time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604763</id>
	<title>Re:DP</title>
	<author>game kid</author>
	<datestamp>1246998120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't be worse than a <em> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Guardian\_Legend" title="wikipedia.org">female game character</a> [wikipedia.org] </em> with "DP" in her name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't be worse than a female game character [ wikipedia.org ] with " DP " in her name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't be worse than a  female game character [wikipedia.org]  with "DP" in her name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603305</id>
	<title>Subliminal messaging?</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1246895940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The one of the news tickers in the video is describing the impeachment of the governor of Illinois a while back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... will the same thing happen to you if you pirate music?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The one of the news tickers in the video is describing the impeachment of the governor of Illinois a while back ... will the same thing happen to you if you pirate music ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one of the news tickers in the video is describing the impeachment of the governor of Illinois a while back ... will the same thing happen to you if you pirate music?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607099</id>
	<title>Re:Don't download this song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246977660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions."</p><p>Oh, the irony...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions .
" Oh , the irony.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
"Oh, the irony...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603487</id>
	<title>The scene with the blacksuits looks very familiar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246897320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That kid is named Blake, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That kid is named Blake , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That kid is named Blake, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604887</id>
	<title>Rap music</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1246999380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not that I'm a fan of rap in general. But I do not think that I should take my moral guidance from rap musicians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I 'm a fan of rap in general .
But I do not think that I should take my moral guidance from rap musicians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I'm a fan of rap in general.
But I do not think that I should take my moral guidance from rap musicians.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603569</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1246897860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll see your IT Crowd vid (funny!) and raise you - <br> <br>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXkxSl4f6vw" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXkxSl4f6vw</a> [youtube.com]

<br> <br>- The Boondocks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll see your IT Crowd vid ( funny !
) and raise you - http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TXkxSl4f6vw [ youtube.com ] - The Boondocks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll see your IT Crowd vid (funny!
) and raise you -  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXkxSl4f6vw [youtube.com]

 - The Boondocks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604793</id>
	<title>Re:This sounds familiar</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246998600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only that there your cubicle has bars and a lockable door.</p><p>Uh... are they hiring? Wait, they are, that's the recruitment video, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only that there your cubicle has bars and a lockable door.Uh... are they hiring ?
Wait , they are , that 's the recruitment video , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only that there your cubicle has bars and a lockable door.Uh... are they hiring?
Wait, they are, that's the recruitment video, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603881</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>MidnightBrewer</author>
	<datestamp>1246900440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the point is that they *wish* they had that kind of power, and decided to act it out in their ill-advised sequel.</p><p>Seriously, exactly who are they targeting with this video? Perhaps they're going for the more subtle commentary that due to piracy they can't afford to make decent marketing materials.  They represent an industry that includes some of the best storytellers and artistic talent around and this is the best they can do? We really *should* worry, if in fact this is the direct upshot of piracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the point is that they * wish * they had that kind of power , and decided to act it out in their ill-advised sequel.Seriously , exactly who are they targeting with this video ?
Perhaps they 're going for the more subtle commentary that due to piracy they ca n't afford to make decent marketing materials .
They represent an industry that includes some of the best storytellers and artistic talent around and this is the best they can do ?
We really * should * worry , if in fact this is the direct upshot of piracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the point is that they *wish* they had that kind of power, and decided to act it out in their ill-advised sequel.Seriously, exactly who are they targeting with this video?
Perhaps they're going for the more subtle commentary that due to piracy they can't afford to make decent marketing materials.
They represent an industry that includes some of the best storytellers and artistic talent around and this is the best they can do?
We really *should* worry, if in fact this is the direct upshot of piracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613179</id>
	<title>Re:Obligitory Plug (Feel free to ignore)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246957980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mod up foos!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mod up foos !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mod up foos!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Asclepius99</author>
	<datestamp>1246896960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc. son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator 's/governor 's/etc .
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc.
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</id>
	<title>Don't download this song</title>
	<author>orkysoft</author>
	<datestamp>1246896300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This one's much better:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32wmepTVM3I" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32wmepTVM3I</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This one 's much better : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 32wmepTVM3I [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This one's much better:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32wmepTVM3I [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603257</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>oneiros27</author>
	<datestamp>1246895640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Huh, that's funny. Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement. Search warrants? For your computer maybe. Serving papers for a court date? Sure. Arrested on the spot? Don't think so. Jail time? Not to my knowledge.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>What?  next, you'll tell me that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz-grdpKVqg" title="youtube.com">Don't Download This Song</a> [youtube.com] was a parody.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , that 's funny .
Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement .
Search warrants ?
For your computer maybe .
Serving papers for a court date ?
Sure. Arrested on the spot ?
Do n't think so .
Jail time ?
Not to my knowledge .
What ? next , you 'll tell me that Do n't Download This Song [ youtube.com ] was a parody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Huh, that's funny.
Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.
Search warrants?
For your computer maybe.
Serving papers for a court date?
Sure. Arrested on the spot?
Don't think so.
Jail time?
Not to my knowledge.
What?  next, you'll tell me that Don't Download This Song [youtube.com] was a parody.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604119</id>
	<title>Comment on the video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246903200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" Adding comments has been disabled for this video.<br>" I wanted to comment on the video too! They are restricting my freedom of speech! I should turn them in. Criminals!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Adding comments has been disabled for this video .
" I wanted to comment on the video too !
They are restricting my freedom of speech !
I should turn them in .
Criminals ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" Adding comments has been disabled for this video.
" I wanted to comment on the video too!
They are restricting my freedom of speech!
I should turn them in.
Criminals!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603949</id>
	<title>Re:Don't download this song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246901160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ironically, <i>"This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , " This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603679</id>
	<title>What</title>
	<author>Smoke2Joints</author>
	<datestamp>1246898580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they actually serious?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they actually serious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they actually serious?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28611403</id>
	<title>Outlaw is cool</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1246994160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Seems like this could be interpreted as a way for nerds to be gangsta.  Keeping it real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like this could be interpreted as a way for nerds to be gangsta .
Keeping it real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Seems like this could be interpreted as a way for nerds to be gangsta.
Keeping it real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605163</id>
	<title>What game will they be featuring?</title>
	<author>WWWWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246959480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the original video had the developers of AOL's <i>Neverwinter Nights</i>, will this new video feature the developers of the current generation's cutting edge MMORPG?</p><p>Don't copy those <i>World of Warcraft</i> CDs! Every time you copy a <i>World of Warcraft</i> CD, Vivendi loses money! A lot of money!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the original video had the developers of AOL 's Neverwinter Nights , will this new video feature the developers of the current generation 's cutting edge MMORPG ? Do n't copy those World of Warcraft CDs !
Every time you copy a World of Warcraft CD , Vivendi loses money !
A lot of money !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the original video had the developers of AOL's Neverwinter Nights, will this new video feature the developers of the current generation's cutting edge MMORPG?Don't copy those World of Warcraft CDs!
Every time you copy a World of Warcraft CD, Vivendi loses money!
A lot of money!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604553</id>
	<title>par for course . . .</title>
	<author>Alan R Light</author>
	<datestamp>1246909080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see.  This commercial<ul>
<li>Promotes the use of a heavily armed and violent response to a nonviolent offence.</li>
<li>Promotes prison rape as a reasonable deterrent to a nonviolent offence.</li>
<li>Promotes taking relatives hostage as a reasonable response to a nonviolent offence.</li>
<li>Manages to violate the law it purports to defend while doing so.</li>
</ul><p>
Yup, sounds like Amerika.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see .
This commercial Promotes the use of a heavily armed and violent response to a nonviolent offence .
Promotes prison rape as a reasonable deterrent to a nonviolent offence .
Promotes taking relatives hostage as a reasonable response to a nonviolent offence .
Manages to violate the law it purports to defend while doing so .
Yup , sounds like Amerika .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see.
This commercial
Promotes the use of a heavily armed and violent response to a nonviolent offence.
Promotes prison rape as a reasonable deterrent to a nonviolent offence.
Promotes taking relatives hostage as a reasonable response to a nonviolent offence.
Manages to violate the law it purports to defend while doing so.
Yup, sounds like Amerika.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603619</id>
	<title>Weird Al</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1246898220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seeing this really just made me think of "Don't Download This Song" by Weird Al, and that was a clear mockery of the system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing this really just made me think of " Do n't Download This Song " by Weird Al , and that was a clear mockery of the system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing this really just made me think of "Don't Download This Song" by Weird Al, and that was a clear mockery of the system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459</id>
	<title>SIIA Members: Google, IBM, Adobe, Intel, Oracle...</title>
	<author>theodp</author>
	<datestamp>1246897140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A selection of U.S. companies from the <a href="http://joomlatest.siia.net/index.php?option=com\_wrapper&amp;view=wrapper&amp;Itemid=44" title="siia.net">SIIA Member Directory</a> [siia.net]: Accenture, Adobe, AOL, Barclays, Bloomberg, CNN, Charles Schwab, Citi, Cognizant, CollabNet, College Board, Deloitte, Deutsche Bank, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, Infosys, Intel, Intuit, JPMorgan Chase, Lazard Freres, McGraw Hill, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Novell, Oracle, Reuters, Salesforce, SAP, SAS, Standard &amp; Poor's, Sun Microsystems, Symantec, Time Warner, UPI, The Wall Street Journal, Wells Fargo Bank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A selection of U.S. companies from the SIIA Member Directory [ siia.net ] : Accenture , Adobe , AOL , Barclays , Bloomberg , CNN , Charles Schwab , Citi , Cognizant , CollabNet , College Board , Deloitte , Deutsche Bank , Fidelity , Goldman Sachs , Google , IBM , Infosys , Intel , Intuit , JPMorgan Chase , Lazard Freres , McGraw Hill , Merrill Lynch , Morgan Stanley , Novell , Oracle , Reuters , Salesforce , SAP , SAS , Standard &amp; Poor 's , Sun Microsystems , Symantec , Time Warner , UPI , The Wall Street Journal , Wells Fargo Bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A selection of U.S. companies from the SIIA Member Directory [siia.net]: Accenture, Adobe, AOL, Barclays, Bloomberg, CNN, Charles Schwab, Citi, Cognizant, CollabNet, College Board, Deloitte, Deutsche Bank, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, Infosys, Intel, Intuit, JPMorgan Chase, Lazard Freres, McGraw Hill, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Novell, Oracle, Reuters, Salesforce, SAP, SAS, Standard &amp; Poor's, Sun Microsystems, Symantec, Time Warner, UPI, The Wall Street Journal, Wells Fargo Bank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603171</id>
	<title>British TV</title>
	<author>jciarlan</author>
	<datestamp>1246895100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forgive the youtube link, but a British TV show called "The IT Crowd" did a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALZZx1xmAzg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">pretty good anti-piracy warning.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forgive the youtube link , but a British TV show called " The IT Crowd " did a pretty good anti-piracy warning .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forgive the youtube link, but a British TV show called "The IT Crowd" did a pretty good anti-piracy warning.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28611671</id>
	<title>Wasn't this already a South Park story line?</title>
	<author>Dark\_Gravity</author>
	<datestamp>1246995120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.</p></div></blockquote><p>I am pretty sure I already saw this basic plot line on a South Park episode.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A smug teen who 's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace ' and 'Tune Weasel ' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.I am pretty sure I already saw this basic plot line on a South Park episode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.I am pretty sure I already saw this basic plot line on a South Park episode.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604291</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246905480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's right on ThePirateB.... errr ooops the ship has sunken. "bwahah ahh I have to go on with my life without the free material."<br>Materialistic bitches who care nothing about downloading their next Hollywood movie to whine about how it sucks.</p><p>Don't worry I am sure you can get a copy from one of the other dozen ones infected with viruses on the flavor of the month torrent website setup to slam you with ads/malware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's right on ThePirateB.... errr ooops the ship has sunken .
" bwahah ahh I have to go on with my life without the free material .
" Materialistic bitches who care nothing about downloading their next Hollywood movie to whine about how it sucks.Do n't worry I am sure you can get a copy from one of the other dozen ones infected with viruses on the flavor of the month torrent website setup to slam you with ads/malware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's right on ThePirateB.... errr ooops the ship has sunken.
"bwahah ahh I have to go on with my life without the free material.
"Materialistic bitches who care nothing about downloading their next Hollywood movie to whine about how it sucks.Don't worry I am sure you can get a copy from one of the other dozen ones infected with viruses on the flavor of the month torrent website setup to slam you with ads/malware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605773</id>
	<title>What is "Tunes Weasel" referring to?</title>
	<author>CAPSLOCK2000</author>
	<datestamp>1246967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get "Pirates Palace", that refers to The Pirate Bay, which suggests that "Tunes Weasel" also refers to some major download site. The obvious reference is to iTunes and Firefox (also known als Iceweasel), but I can't believe that they would imply that iTunes is illegal.</p><p>Weasel could refer to IceWeasel which is another name for Firefox. I'm sure there's a bunch of people around that think that Firefox is somewhat fishy because people download it.<br>Another possibility is that it refers to Waffles, which is almost an acronym of Weasel.</p><p>Am I missing something or is competition really that fierce that they will even attack iTunes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get " Pirates Palace " , that refers to The Pirate Bay , which suggests that " Tunes Weasel " also refers to some major download site .
The obvious reference is to iTunes and Firefox ( also known als Iceweasel ) , but I ca n't believe that they would imply that iTunes is illegal.Weasel could refer to IceWeasel which is another name for Firefox .
I 'm sure there 's a bunch of people around that think that Firefox is somewhat fishy because people download it.Another possibility is that it refers to Waffles , which is almost an acronym of Weasel.Am I missing something or is competition really that fierce that they will even attack iTunes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get "Pirates Palace", that refers to The Pirate Bay, which suggests that "Tunes Weasel" also refers to some major download site.
The obvious reference is to iTunes and Firefox (also known als Iceweasel), but I can't believe that they would imply that iTunes is illegal.Weasel could refer to IceWeasel which is another name for Firefox.
I'm sure there's a bunch of people around that think that Firefox is somewhat fishy because people download it.Another possibility is that it refers to Waffles, which is almost an acronym of Weasel.Am I missing something or is competition really that fierce that they will even attack iTunes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603295</id>
	<title>I think it's in the NET Act somewhere...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246895880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Huh, that's funny. Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement. Search warrants? For your computer maybe. Serving papers for a court date? Sure. Arrested on the spot? Don't think so. Jail time? Not to my knowledge. The only legal consequence the SIIA lists on their site are "significant fines for copyright infringement." Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I don't think he'll be doing time.</p><p>Google the NET Act.  Basically, it seems to have been intended to make certain types of file sharing into commercial piracy (and those have a prison sentence).  I believe it added a clause saying that if you give someone infringing works with the expectation of getting some in return, that makes the activity "commercial."  And this was passed in the days before BitTorrent, so I don't think it's ever been enforced quite like that.  More likely they were going after big warez groups/ratio sites where you do things like that.</p><p>Anyhow, I don't think anyone has actually *gotten* jail time for what most of us would think of as non-commercial file sharing, but that doesn't mean it's impossible what with the copyright czars and RIAA lawyers in this administration...</p><p>A backlash against this nonsense is stirring and the RIAA types are making sure they have a firm grip on our legislators ears and wallets ahead of time.  That's also why they want to go after the recording of courtroom audio, etc.  Too bad they don't know about the Streisand Effect.  A lot of people who were ignoring those recordings might start listening to them...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Huh , that 's funny .
Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement .
Search warrants ?
For your computer maybe .
Serving papers for a court date ?
Sure. Arrested on the spot ?
Do n't think so .
Jail time ?
Not to my knowledge .
The only legal consequence the SIIA lists on their site are " significant fines for copyright infringement .
" Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N ' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I do n't think he 'll be doing time.Google the NET Act .
Basically , it seems to have been intended to make certain types of file sharing into commercial piracy ( and those have a prison sentence ) .
I believe it added a clause saying that if you give someone infringing works with the expectation of getting some in return , that makes the activity " commercial .
" And this was passed in the days before BitTorrent , so I do n't think it 's ever been enforced quite like that .
More likely they were going after big warez groups/ratio sites where you do things like that.Anyhow , I do n't think anyone has actually * gotten * jail time for what most of us would think of as non-commercial file sharing , but that does n't mean it 's impossible what with the copyright czars and RIAA lawyers in this administration...A backlash against this nonsense is stirring and the RIAA types are making sure they have a firm grip on our legislators ears and wallets ahead of time .
That 's also why they want to go after the recording of courtroom audio , etc .
Too bad they do n't know about the Streisand Effect .
A lot of people who were ignoring those recordings might start listening to them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Huh, that's funny.
Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.
Search warrants?
For your computer maybe.
Serving papers for a court date?
Sure. Arrested on the spot?
Don't think so.
Jail time?
Not to my knowledge.
The only legal consequence the SIIA lists on their site are "significant fines for copyright infringement.
" Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I don't think he'll be doing time.Google the NET Act.
Basically, it seems to have been intended to make certain types of file sharing into commercial piracy (and those have a prison sentence).
I believe it added a clause saying that if you give someone infringing works with the expectation of getting some in return, that makes the activity "commercial.
"  And this was passed in the days before BitTorrent, so I don't think it's ever been enforced quite like that.
More likely they were going after big warez groups/ratio sites where you do things like that.Anyhow, I don't think anyone has actually *gotten* jail time for what most of us would think of as non-commercial file sharing, but that doesn't mean it's impossible what with the copyright czars and RIAA lawyers in this administration...A backlash against this nonsense is stirring and the RIAA types are making sure they have a firm grip on our legislators ears and wallets ahead of time.
That's also why they want to go after the recording of courtroom audio, etc.
Too bad they don't know about the Streisand Effect.
A lot of people who were ignoring those recordings might start listening to them...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610665</id>
	<title>I don't understand...</title>
	<author>gregthebunny</author>
	<datestamp>1246991460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...why some (most?) people seem to think it's okay to download something simply because they can. Am I the only person left who finds it morally objectionable to obtain something that I very well should have paid for? If I want a CD or DVD or video game, I go to the store and buy it. If a new NIB copy is too expensive for my tastes, I hit up the local resale shops. If that's still too much, then I rent or borrow it to make sure I like it and am willing to invest in it. Otherwise, I wait until the price goes down. Perhaps I'm up on my moral horse again. Perhaps I'm just wrong. Or perhaps I'm one of the few people left who still sees things properly in this up side down world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...why some ( most ?
) people seem to think it 's okay to download something simply because they can .
Am I the only person left who finds it morally objectionable to obtain something that I very well should have paid for ?
If I want a CD or DVD or video game , I go to the store and buy it .
If a new NIB copy is too expensive for my tastes , I hit up the local resale shops .
If that 's still too much , then I rent or borrow it to make sure I like it and am willing to invest in it .
Otherwise , I wait until the price goes down .
Perhaps I 'm up on my moral horse again .
Perhaps I 'm just wrong .
Or perhaps I 'm one of the few people left who still sees things properly in this up side down world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...why some (most?
) people seem to think it's okay to download something simply because they can.
Am I the only person left who finds it morally objectionable to obtain something that I very well should have paid for?
If I want a CD or DVD or video game, I go to the store and buy it.
If a new NIB copy is too expensive for my tastes, I hit up the local resale shops.
If that's still too much, then I rent or borrow it to make sure I like it and am willing to invest in it.
Otherwise, I wait until the price goes down.
Perhaps I'm up on my moral horse again.
Perhaps I'm just wrong.
Or perhaps I'm one of the few people left who still sees things properly in this up side down world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613469</id>
	<title>Deep thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246959120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After long and careful consideration, I've decided that the "Don't coppy that floppy" advertisement has merit.  I will no longer duplicate floppy disk media.</p><p>It may take another 25 years or so to evaluate their next campaign, but rest assured, I will give it careful consideration!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After long and careful consideration , I 've decided that the " Do n't coppy that floppy " advertisement has merit .
I will no longer duplicate floppy disk media.It may take another 25 years or so to evaluate their next campaign , but rest assured , I will give it careful consideration !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After long and careful consideration, I've decided that the "Don't coppy that floppy" advertisement has merit.
I will no longer duplicate floppy disk media.It may take another 25 years or so to evaluate their next campaign, but rest assured, I will give it careful consideration!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603281</id>
	<title>Remember Children</title>
	<author>HavePatience</author>
	<datestamp>1246895760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you make copies of intellectual property, liscensed video games ans software programs, you will be erased with state violence.  <br>

It is okay to kidnap and possibly kill people with state violence for things they do with ideas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you make copies of intellectual property , liscensed video games ans software programs , you will be erased with state violence .
It is okay to kidnap and possibly kill people with state violence for things they do with ideas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you make copies of intellectual property, liscensed video games ans software programs, you will be erased with state violence.
It is okay to kidnap and possibly kill people with state violence for things they do with ideas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603771</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>PachmanP</author>
	<datestamp>1246899420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc. son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.</p></div><p>While I don't think much of the RIAA/MPAA/MAFIAA, I can't imagine them being <i>that</i> stupid!  It would certainly be nice, but I think it's right up there with world peace.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator 's/governor 's/etc .
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.While I do n't think much of the RIAA/MPAA/MAFIAA , I ca n't imagine them being that stupid !
It would certainly be nice , but I think it 's right up there with world peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc.
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.While I don't think much of the RIAA/MPAA/MAFIAA, I can't imagine them being that stupid!
It would certainly be nice, but I think it's right up there with world peace.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604087</id>
	<title>Commercial software?</title>
	<author>Casandro</author>
	<datestamp>1246902780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought commercial software companies all died in the 2000 bubble. Except for specialist areas where nobody wants to copy it anyhow.</p><p>BTW <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/StorageD1984" title="archive.org">http://www.archive.org/details/StorageD1984</a> [archive.org] :<br>At about 4 minutes in, an Interview with Alan Shugart, Founder of Seagate.<br>Some of his statements in there:<br>We will not see the Floppy Disk beeing replaced by semiconductor memory.</p><p>This is the part where it really relates to "Don't Copy That Floppy"-Video:<br>Question: "You see this size (3,5") replacing the 5 1/4 inch disks?"<br>Answer: "No I don't. I think there's a marketplace for the smaller size..., but I don't think that they'll ever replace the 5 1/4 inch mini floppy, because all those programms are written on mini floppies, and you'll never gonna be able to in your wildest imagination transscribe all those programms onto smaller disks. It isn't gonna be done.".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought commercial software companies all died in the 2000 bubble .
Except for specialist areas where nobody wants to copy it anyhow.BTW http : //www.archive.org/details/StorageD1984 [ archive.org ] : At about 4 minutes in , an Interview with Alan Shugart , Founder of Seagate.Some of his statements in there : We will not see the Floppy Disk beeing replaced by semiconductor memory.This is the part where it really relates to " Do n't Copy That Floppy " -Video : Question : " You see this size ( 3,5 " ) replacing the 5 1/4 inch disks ?
" Answer : " No I do n't .
I think there 's a marketplace for the smaller size... , but I do n't think that they 'll ever replace the 5 1/4 inch mini floppy , because all those programms are written on mini floppies , and you 'll never gon na be able to in your wildest imagination transscribe all those programms onto smaller disks .
It is n't gon na be done .
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought commercial software companies all died in the 2000 bubble.
Except for specialist areas where nobody wants to copy it anyhow.BTW http://www.archive.org/details/StorageD1984 [archive.org] :At about 4 minutes in, an Interview with Alan Shugart, Founder of Seagate.Some of his statements in there:We will not see the Floppy Disk beeing replaced by semiconductor memory.This is the part where it really relates to "Don't Copy That Floppy"-Video:Question: "You see this size (3,5") replacing the 5 1/4 inch disks?
"Answer: "No I don't.
I think there's a marketplace for the smaller size..., but I don't think that they'll ever replace the 5 1/4 inch mini floppy, because all those programms are written on mini floppies, and you'll never gonna be able to in your wildest imagination transscribe all those programms onto smaller disks.
It isn't gonna be done.
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603987</id>
	<title>Re:Don't download this song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246901640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Youtube won't let me watch that video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube wo n't let me watch that video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube won't let me watch that video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605145</id>
	<title>Re:SIIA Members: Google, IBM, Adobe, Intel, Oracle</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1246959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's weird that Microsoft isn't there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's weird that Microsoft is n't there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's weird that Microsoft isn't there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608757</id>
	<title>Help stamp out piracy - Use Linux</title>
	<author>awpoopy</author>
	<datestamp>1246983900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Use Linux.
<br>
You are free to:
<br>
Copy it.
<br>
Give it to a friend.
<br>
Put it on a website for <em>anyone</em> to download or copy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use Linux .
You are free to : Copy it .
Give it to a friend .
Put it on a website for anyone to download or copy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use Linux.
You are free to:

Copy it.
Give it to a friend.
Put it on a website for anyone to download or copy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607687</id>
	<title>Does this mean war?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246979820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now they (the RIAA et al) are openly and explicitly threatening our lives?  Does this mean the gloves are off? Is it open season on xxAA executives?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now they ( the RIAA et al ) are openly and explicitly threatening our lives ?
Does this mean the gloves are off ?
Is it open season on xxAA executives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now they (the RIAA et al) are openly and explicitly threatening our lives?
Does this mean the gloves are off?
Is it open season on xxAA executives?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603997</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>influenza</author>
	<datestamp>1246901760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe SIIA has been given a preview of what's being negotiated for the secret ACTA treaty.</p><p>National security my ass...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe SIIA has been given a preview of what 's being negotiated for the secret ACTA treaty.National security my ass.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe SIIA has been given a preview of what's being negotiated for the secret ACTA treaty.National security my ass...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</id>
	<title>A better video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246895040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGXavXZwRcg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGXavXZwRcg</a> [youtube.com]

From the IT crowd (BBC) - an anti piracy ad.

Except its for films. yet its a better video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = CGXavXZwRcg [ youtube.com ] From the IT crowd ( BBC ) - an anti piracy ad .
Except its for films .
yet its a better video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGXavXZwRcg [youtube.com]

From the IT crowd (BBC) - an anti piracy ad.
Except its for films.
yet its a better video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603735</id>
	<title>perfect Libertarian propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246899060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This video isn't about piracy at all. It's the perfect police state scenario, this ought to scare all those kids into voting for Libertarians instead of Democrats and Republicans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This video is n't about piracy at all .
It 's the perfect police state scenario , this ought to scare all those kids into voting for Libertarians instead of Democrats and Republicans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This video isn't about piracy at all.
It's the perfect police state scenario, this ought to scare all those kids into voting for Libertarians instead of Democrats and Republicans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605825</id>
	<title>Neverwinter Nights!</title>
	<author>EightBits</author>
	<datestamp>1246968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had no idea Neverwinter Nights was a game back then.  And an MMORPG to boot.  I was living in the C64 world until 1997 so I had no real desire to keep up with the PC world.  I was/am a very big an of the gold box D&amp;D games and I feel totally and completely cheated!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no idea Neverwinter Nights was a game back then .
And an MMORPG to boot .
I was living in the C64 world until 1997 so I had no real desire to keep up with the PC world .
I was/am a very big an of the gold box D&amp;D games and I feel totally and completely cheated !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no idea Neverwinter Nights was a game back then.
And an MMORPG to boot.
I was living in the C64 world until 1997 so I had no real desire to keep up with the PC world.
I was/am a very big an of the gold box D&amp;D games and I feel totally and completely cheated!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604883</id>
	<title>New video 'stolen' / suspected peado fantasy's</title>
	<author>yossarianuk</author>
	<datestamp>1246999380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Due to the similarities between this and the 90's video I believe there is a case of copyright infringement, maybe the creators of this vid should be gang raped in jail instead of kids downloading tracks. I would also like the designers of the video to have their hard drives checked - they appear to be into kiddie rape...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to the similarities between this and the 90 's video I believe there is a case of copyright infringement , maybe the creators of this vid should be gang raped in jail instead of kids downloading tracks .
I would also like the designers of the video to have their hard drives checked - they appear to be into kiddie rape.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to the similarities between this and the 90's video I believe there is a case of copyright infringement, maybe the creators of this vid should be gang raped in jail instead of kids downloading tracks.
I would also like the designers of the video to have their hard drives checked - they appear to be into kiddie rape...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604207</id>
	<title>sad....</title>
	<author>ushere</author>
	<datestamp>1246904460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that video is so, so sad, i really wanted to cry, but couldn't cause i was laughing so hard..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that video is so , so sad , i really wanted to cry , but could n't cause i was laughing so hard. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that video is so, so sad, i really wanted to cry, but couldn't cause i was laughing so hard..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610727</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1246991700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.</i></p><p>You're right that they don't <i>normally</i> engage in criminal prosecution, but the law does in fact criminalize most common simple infringement. Specifically NET act redefined "financial gain" to include the receipt or expectation of receipt of anything of value, including other copyrighted works. Effectively anyone who has ever touched P2P is technically guilty of criminal infringement and subject to up to a year in prison, or up to 3 years if it's more than a handful of files. Australian law has up to a 2 year prison term for simple common P2P, and the US has been pushing for a directive requiring criminal penalties for "commercial scale" infringement - where "commercial scale" is a euphemism for "on the internet".</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement.You 're right that they do n't normally engage in criminal prosecution , but the law does in fact criminalize most common simple infringement .
Specifically NET act redefined " financial gain " to include the receipt or expectation of receipt of anything of value , including other copyrighted works .
Effectively anyone who has ever touched P2P is technically guilty of criminal infringement and subject to up to a year in prison , or up to 3 years if it 's more than a handful of files .
Australian law has up to a 2 year prison term for simple common P2P , and the US has been pushing for a directive requiring criminal penalties for " commercial scale " infringement - where " commercial scale " is a euphemism for " on the internet " .-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.You're right that they don't normally engage in criminal prosecution, but the law does in fact criminalize most common simple infringement.
Specifically NET act redefined "financial gain" to include the receipt or expectation of receipt of anything of value, including other copyrighted works.
Effectively anyone who has ever touched P2P is technically guilty of criminal infringement and subject to up to a year in prison, or up to 3 years if it's more than a handful of files.
Australian law has up to a 2 year prison term for simple common P2P, and the US has been pushing for a directive requiring criminal penalties for "commercial scale" infringement - where "commercial scale" is a euphemism for "on the internet".-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605561</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1246964460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Channel 4 has a better range of comedy non-quiz programmes than most other channels, both now and historically. Peep show, black books, spaced<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Also Channel 4 provides them all, for free, on 4oD, should you want to watch them ever. Talk about providing a means to stop piracy, why pirate when it's available from the maker!</p><p>BBC gives us QI, HIGNFW, Mock The Week, Never Mind The Buzzcocks, Mighty Boosh, and only the latter isn't a faux quiz. Why don't the faux news quizzes run for half the year, it's not as if they're going to run out of news! Why do they get 8 week 'seasons'? FAIL BBC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Channel 4 has a better range of comedy non-quiz programmes than most other channels , both now and historically .
Peep show , black books , spaced ...Also Channel 4 provides them all , for free , on 4oD , should you want to watch them ever .
Talk about providing a means to stop piracy , why pirate when it 's available from the maker ! BBC gives us QI , HIGNFW , Mock The Week , Never Mind The Buzzcocks , Mighty Boosh , and only the latter is n't a faux quiz .
Why do n't the faux news quizzes run for half the year , it 's not as if they 're going to run out of news !
Why do they get 8 week 'seasons ' ?
FAIL BBC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Channel 4 has a better range of comedy non-quiz programmes than most other channels, both now and historically.
Peep show, black books, spaced ...Also Channel 4 provides them all, for free, on 4oD, should you want to watch them ever.
Talk about providing a means to stop piracy, why pirate when it's available from the maker!BBC gives us QI, HIGNFW, Mock The Week, Never Mind The Buzzcocks, Mighty Boosh, and only the latter isn't a faux quiz.
Why don't the faux news quizzes run for half the year, it's not as if they're going to run out of news!
Why do they get 8 week 'seasons'?
FAIL BBC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603435</id>
	<title>Worst</title>
	<author>dindi</author>
	<datestamp>1246896960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regardless of what it is about, it is the worst short film/clip/propaganda I have seen in a long time. That includes local (Costa Rican) commercials and Latin American soap operas<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....</p><p>OMG<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... shame on you for making me watch this</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regardless of what it is about , it is the worst short film/clip/propaganda I have seen in a long time .
That includes local ( Costa Rican ) commercials and Latin American soap operas .....OMG .... shame on you for making me watch this</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regardless of what it is about, it is the worst short film/clip/propaganda I have seen in a long time.
That includes local (Costa Rican) commercials and Latin American soap operas .....OMG .... shame on you for making me watch this</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603675</id>
	<title>I'm glad to see</title>
	<author>morsmortis</author>
	<datestamp>1246898520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>how our tax money is put to good use in these perilous times with the portrayal of a swat-like raid on a software pirate.
You know because he probably spends the money he saves, by pirating software, on assault weapons, hardcore drugs, and danky craigslist girls.</htmltext>
<tokenext>how our tax money is put to good use in these perilous times with the portrayal of a swat-like raid on a software pirate .
You know because he probably spends the money he saves , by pirating software , on assault weapons , hardcore drugs , and danky craigslist girls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how our tax money is put to good use in these perilous times with the portrayal of a swat-like raid on a software pirate.
You know because he probably spends the money he saves, by pirating software, on assault weapons, hardcore drugs, and danky craigslist girls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603445</id>
	<title>I wanted to watch Don't Copy That Floppy...</title>
	<author>Noodles</author>
	<datestamp>1246897020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but when the rapping started they lost me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but when the rapping started they lost me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but when the rapping started they lost me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603969</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard these scare tactics before?</title>
	<author>shiftless</author>
	<datestamp>1246901460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, give me a fucking break. Every day, all day long, bullshit organizations like "Above the Influence" show stupid ass commercials on TV telling kids that their brain is going to melt if they were to even take one hit of a joint. In the mean time, yes, there ARE innocent people having their doors kicked in, and people getting killed in the process, because of this idiotic War on (Some) Drugs.</p><p>Just like anybody else, I can spend 10 seconds doing a Google search and come up with countless examples of senseless deaths and tragedies, all due to a war on a fucking plant. You think it doesn't happen? Well then you are a fucking TOOL who needs to do some research and wake up.</p><p>Check this out for an example:</p><p><a href="http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/156/policeshootings.shtml" title="stopthedrugwar.org">http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/156/policeshootings.shtml</a> [stopthedrugwar.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , give me a fucking break .
Every day , all day long , bullshit organizations like " Above the Influence " show stupid ass commercials on TV telling kids that their brain is going to melt if they were to even take one hit of a joint .
In the mean time , yes , there ARE innocent people having their doors kicked in , and people getting killed in the process , because of this idiotic War on ( Some ) Drugs.Just like anybody else , I can spend 10 seconds doing a Google search and come up with countless examples of senseless deaths and tragedies , all due to a war on a fucking plant .
You think it does n't happen ?
Well then you are a fucking TOOL who needs to do some research and wake up.Check this out for an example : http : //stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/156/policeshootings.shtml [ stopthedrugwar.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, give me a fucking break.
Every day, all day long, bullshit organizations like "Above the Influence" show stupid ass commercials on TV telling kids that their brain is going to melt if they were to even take one hit of a joint.
In the mean time, yes, there ARE innocent people having their doors kicked in, and people getting killed in the process, because of this idiotic War on (Some) Drugs.Just like anybody else, I can spend 10 seconds doing a Google search and come up with countless examples of senseless deaths and tragedies, all due to a war on a fucking plant.
You think it doesn't happen?
Well then you are a fucking TOOL who needs to do some research and wake up.Check this out for an example:http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/156/policeshootings.shtml [stopthedrugwar.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28615747</id>
	<title>Almost over</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246969860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds me of the death throws of the viruses I was removing from a buddies computer the other day.  You could see the programs fight AVG to the death.  A million pop-ups warning me about the horrible things that were happening to the computer as it was being cleansed of the bullshit.<br>In 21st Century America the RIAA are the new Luddites.  Yay!  That mean's that it's just about over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of the death throws of the viruses I was removing from a buddies computer the other day .
You could see the programs fight AVG to the death .
A million pop-ups warning me about the horrible things that were happening to the computer as it was being cleansed of the bullshit.In 21st Century America the RIAA are the new Luddites .
Yay ! That mean 's that it 's just about over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of the death throws of the viruses I was removing from a buddies computer the other day.
You could see the programs fight AVG to the death.
A million pop-ups warning me about the horrible things that were happening to the computer as it was being cleansed of the bullshit.In 21st Century America the RIAA are the new Luddites.
Yay!  That mean's that it's just about over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604055</id>
	<title>Why didn't they just use Weird Al?</title>
	<author>ProfM</author>
	<datestamp>1246902420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He already made a jingle AND a video.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i57g21Z8Kc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i57g21Z8Kc</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I guess maybe it wouldn't have made the same impact<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He already made a jingle AND a video.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 1i57g21Z8Kc [ youtube.com ] I guess maybe it would n't have made the same impact .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He already made a jingle AND a video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i57g21Z8Kc [youtube.com]I guess maybe it wouldn't have made the same impact ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605059</id>
	<title>What we really need...</title>
	<author>Bones3D\_mac</author>
	<datestamp>1246958280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is a PSA that warns viewers that the content of most PSAs are rarely objective and are often funded by organizations trying to push their own agenda. (Some of which may actually be worse than the crap they're PSAing to us about.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is a PSA that warns viewers that the content of most PSAs are rarely objective and are often funded by organizations trying to push their own agenda .
( Some of which may actually be worse than the crap they 're PSAing to us about .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is a PSA that warns viewers that the content of most PSAs are rarely objective and are often funded by organizations trying to push their own agenda.
(Some of which may actually be worse than the crap they're PSAing to us about.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603979</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard these scare tactics before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246901580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...in every city in every state in this country, there are <i>evil, <b>evil,</b> </i> police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off... and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas, ostriches, elephants...</p></div><p>You lost me when you started going all beastiality on us, bro.</p><p>I hope the FBI puts you into some sort of freak-show list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...in every city in every state in this country , there are evil , evil , police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments... ...the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off... and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas , ostriches , elephants...You lost me when you started going all beastiality on us , bro.I hope the FBI puts you into some sort of freak-show list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...in every city in every state in this country, there are evil, evil,  police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments... ...the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off... and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas, ostriches, elephants...You lost me when you started going all beastiality on us, bro.I hope the FBI puts you into some sort of freak-show list.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605137</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1246959240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Huh, that's funny. Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.</p> </div><p> <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia\_reading\_room/usam/title9/crm01852.htm" title="usdoj.gov">Check again</a> [usdoj.gov]:</p><p><i>A defendant, convicted for the first time of violating 17 U.S.C. &#194;  506(a) by the unauthorized reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, or 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500 <b>can be imprisoned for up to 5 years</b> and fined up to $250,000, or both. </i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , that 's funny .
Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement .
Check again [ usdoj.gov ] : A defendant , convicted for the first time of violating 17 U.S.C .
  506 ( a ) by the unauthorized reproduction or distribution , during any 180-day period , of at least 10 copies or phonorecords , or 1 or more copyrighted works , with a retail value of more than $ 2,500 can be imprisoned for up to 5 years and fined up to $ 250,000 , or both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh, that's funny.
Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.
Check again [usdoj.gov]:A defendant, convicted for the first time of violating 17 U.S.C.
Â  506(a) by the unauthorized reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, or 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500 can be imprisoned for up to 5 years and fined up to $250,000, or both. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604005</id>
	<title>Re:Where have I heard these scare tactics before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246901880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Were you making a point? Because it seems like you made two half-points, each opposing the other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Were you making a point ?
Because it seems like you made two half-points , each opposing the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Were you making a point?
Because it seems like you made two half-points, each opposing the other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610313</id>
	<title>Re:Don't download this song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246990200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Videoklippet &#228;r tyv&#228;rr inte tillg&#228;ngligt i ditt land p&#229; grund av upphovsr&#228;ttsbegr&#228;nsningar."</p><p>"The video clip is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions."</p><p>The irony is killing me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Videoklippet   r tyv   rr inte tillg   ngligt i ditt land p   grund av upphovsr   ttsbegr   nsningar .
" " The video clip is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions .
" The irony is killing me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Videoklippet är tyvärr inte tillgängligt i ditt land på grund av upphovsrättsbegränsningar.
""The video clip is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
"The irony is killing me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605929</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>funkatron</author>
	<datestamp>1246969620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That link just gives me a demonstration of why piracy is better than legit: "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions. ".</htmltext>
<tokenext>That link just gives me a demonstration of why piracy is better than legit : " This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions .
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That link just gives me a demonstration of why piracy is better than legit: "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions.
".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28609321</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246986120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You idiots are missing the point. The producers of this video KNOW you won't do jail time. They also know that most people won't bother to fact check a fake PSA. The propaganda factor is what matters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You idiots are missing the point .
The producers of this video KNOW you wo n't do jail time .
They also know that most people wo n't bother to fact check a fake PSA .
The propaganda factor is what matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You idiots are missing the point.
The producers of this video KNOW you won't do jail time.
They also know that most people won't bother to fact check a fake PSA.
The propaganda factor is what matters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605915</id>
	<title>This just confirms it.</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1246969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The *IAA's want to become the next SS/KGB/Stasi, using paramilitary actions as a way to keep the dollars trickling into their dying business models.</p><p>The truly scary part?</p><p>That suits in both Hollywood and on the Beltway believe that this is a viable way to treat the American people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The * IAA 's want to become the next SS/KGB/Stasi , using paramilitary actions as a way to keep the dollars trickling into their dying business models.The truly scary part ? That suits in both Hollywood and on the Beltway believe that this is a viable way to treat the American people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The *IAA's want to become the next SS/KGB/Stasi, using paramilitary actions as a way to keep the dollars trickling into their dying business models.The truly scary part?That suits in both Hollywood and on the Beltway believe that this is a viable way to treat the American people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605489</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1246963680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not available in the UK due to copyright restrictions? I fucking paid for it to be made!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not available in the UK due to copyright restrictions ?
I fucking paid for it to be made !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not available in the UK due to copyright restrictions?
I fucking paid for it to be made!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604231</id>
	<title>awesome!</title>
	<author>Nekomusume</author>
	<datestamp>1246904820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An anti-piracy video that portrays the RIAA/MPAA/Law Enforcement as being a bunch of over-reacting psychotics? Sounds like a pirate-party recruitment video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anti-piracy video that portrays the RIAA/MPAA/Law Enforcement as being a bunch of over-reacting psychotics ?
Sounds like a pirate-party recruitment video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anti-piracy video that portrays the RIAA/MPAA/Law Enforcement as being a bunch of over-reacting psychotics?
Sounds like a pirate-party recruitment video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28616789</id>
	<title>Are They Joking?  Appeal to this generation??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246978080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Clinton redefined lying and you want people to stop cheating, lying, stealing and whatever?   Good f-in luck.  When you have high-school polls that show students unanimously agreeing that they must cheat in order to 'get ahead', its over.  We've been screwed since the 1980s with this new generation of do-nothing parenting, "I never say no to my kids" whackos, etc.     Get past it, theft is here to stay forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Clinton redefined lying and you want people to stop cheating , lying , stealing and whatever ?
Good f-in luck .
When you have high-school polls that show students unanimously agreeing that they must cheat in order to 'get ahead ' , its over .
We 've been screwed since the 1980s with this new generation of do-nothing parenting , " I never say no to my kids " whackos , etc .
Get past it , theft is here to stay forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Clinton redefined lying and you want people to stop cheating, lying, stealing and whatever?
Good f-in luck.
When you have high-school polls that show students unanimously agreeing that they must cheat in order to 'get ahead', its over.
We've been screwed since the 1980s with this new generation of do-nothing parenting, "I never say no to my kids" whackos, etc.
Get past it, theft is here to stay forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604889</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246999440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They shouldn't hope for a war. Their lairs (and thus primary targets) are usually clearly marked with large signs of their logos on top of them, while their sneaky opponents usually hide in plain resident dwellings. Asymmetric warfare ftw!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should n't hope for a war .
Their lairs ( and thus primary targets ) are usually clearly marked with large signs of their logos on top of them , while their sneaky opponents usually hide in plain resident dwellings .
Asymmetric warfare ftw !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They shouldn't hope for a war.
Their lairs (and thus primary targets) are usually clearly marked with large signs of their logos on top of them, while their sneaky opponents usually hide in plain resident dwellings.
Asymmetric warfare ftw!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246894860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone got a link to the torrent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone got a link to the torrent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone got a link to the torrent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603485</id>
	<title>So it's not a parody?</title>
	<author>British</author>
	<datestamp>1246897320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it's almost spot-on like the video from the IT crowd, yet it's from the same creators of DCTF. You are shown police state tactics with a scene that reminds me of Brazil.</p><p>We have come a long way, America.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it 's almost spot-on like the video from the IT crowd , yet it 's from the same creators of DCTF .
You are shown police state tactics with a scene that reminds me of Brazil.We have come a long way , America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it's almost spot-on like the video from the IT crowd, yet it's from the same creators of DCTF.
You are shown police state tactics with a scene that reminds me of Brazil.We have come a long way, America.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603557</id>
	<title>IN SOVIET RUSSIA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246897800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Floppy Copy YOU!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Floppy Copy YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Floppy Copy YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604337</id>
	<title>Re:SIIA Members: Google, IBM, Adobe, Intel, Oracle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246906080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So my investment banker and my money manager are both on that list.... Now what? If you were to avoid all those companies you would screw yourself over.</p><p>Since democracy is an abject failure due to corporate spending power I forward the idea of disregarding the law. No taxation without representation was a past war cry, perhaps we can rally under a new one when we hit the copy button.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So my investment banker and my money manager are both on that list.... Now what ?
If you were to avoid all those companies you would screw yourself over.Since democracy is an abject failure due to corporate spending power I forward the idea of disregarding the law .
No taxation without representation was a past war cry , perhaps we can rally under a new one when we hit the copy button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So my investment banker and my money manager are both on that list.... Now what?
If you were to avoid all those companies you would screw yourself over.Since democracy is an abject failure due to corporate spending power I forward the idea of disregarding the law.
No taxation without representation was a past war cry, perhaps we can rally under a new one when we hit the copy button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28647733</id>
	<title>rof</title>
	<author>KingBenny</author>
	<datestamp>1247228700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>lmao , the last one helped too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... doesn't darwin predict the extinction of any who do never adapt their oneway tactics ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>lmao , the last one helped too ... does n't darwin predict the extinction of any who do never adapt their oneway tactics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lmao , the last one helped too ... doesn't darwin predict the extinction of any who do never adapt their oneway tactics ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605017</id>
	<title>Worrying and amusing in equal measure</title>
	<author>Gaxx</author>
	<datestamp>1246957740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What really strikes me is how well this current fumbled outing into marketing to youth culture really demonstrates the inability to understand that culture and what might motivate its members.
<br> <br>
We already had ample indications that the recording industry, as a whole, was seriously struggling with the paradigm shifts of the digital age but this really does suggest floudering at a much deeper level of connect with their customer base.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What really strikes me is how well this current fumbled outing into marketing to youth culture really demonstrates the inability to understand that culture and what might motivate its members .
We already had ample indications that the recording industry , as a whole , was seriously struggling with the paradigm shifts of the digital age but this really does suggest floudering at a much deeper level of connect with their customer base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What really strikes me is how well this current fumbled outing into marketing to youth culture really demonstrates the inability to understand that culture and what might motivate its members.
We already had ample indications that the recording industry, as a whole, was seriously struggling with the paradigm shifts of the digital age but this really does suggest floudering at a much deeper level of connect with their customer base.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603721</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246898940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc. son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.</i></p><p>Unfortunately not. The copyright holders would treat them with kid gloves, drop the case, and give them a gentle, 'hey don't do it again speech'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator 's/governor 's/etc .
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.Unfortunately not .
The copyright holders would treat them with kid gloves , drop the case , and give them a gentle , 'hey do n't do it again speech' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think the fastest way to see a change would be if a senator's/governor's/etc.
son/daughter was caught pirating their favorite song/movie/whatever.Unfortunately not.
The copyright holders would treat them with kid gloves, drop the case, and give them a gentle, 'hey don't do it again speech'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604645</id>
	<title>Speaking Of Copyright Stupidity</title>
	<author>gacl</author>
	<datestamp>1246996800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Deep Purple sued because they failed to pay royalties to themselves. . . ??!!
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://russiatoday.com/Art\_and\_Fun/2009-07-03/Deep\_Purple\_ordered\_to\_pay\_royalty\_to\_themselves\_.html" title="russiatoday.com" rel="nofollow">http://russiatoday.com/Art\_and\_Fun/2009-07-03/Deep\_Purple\_ordered\_to\_pay\_royalty\_to\_themselves\_.html</a> [russiatoday.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Deep Purple sued because they failed to pay royalties to themselves .
. .
? ? ! ! http : //russiatoday.com/Art \ _and \ _Fun/2009-07-03/Deep \ _Purple \ _ordered \ _to \ _pay \ _royalty \ _to \ _themselves \ _.html [ russiatoday.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deep Purple sued because they failed to pay royalties to themselves.
. .
??!!


http://russiatoday.com/Art\_and\_Fun/2009-07-03/Deep\_Purple\_ordered\_to\_pay\_royalty\_to\_themselves\_.html [russiatoday.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603241</id>
	<title>So, basicly,</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1246895460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's RIAA-porn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's RIAA-porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's RIAA-porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603269</id>
	<title>Well, at least it's truth in advertising</title>
	<author>RLiegh</author>
	<datestamp>1246895700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because we've seen that the RIAA <b>will</b> go after your family if they don't think they can get any money out of you; regardless of whether or not any of you even own a computer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because we 've seen that the RIAA will go after your family if they do n't think they can get any money out of you ; regardless of whether or not any of you even own a computer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because we've seen that the RIAA will go after your family if they don't think they can get any money out of you; regardless of whether or not any of you even own a computer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613641</id>
	<title>Already Been Done</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246959780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weird Al already <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32wmepTVM3I" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">pre-empted</a> [youtube.com] this movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weird Al already pre-empted [ youtube.com ] this movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weird Al already pre-empted [youtube.com] this movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610039</id>
	<title>Don't Copy That 2 - Reloaded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246988940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world unchanged when he, like millions of others, is never contacted by the authorities because, well, they have better things to do with their limited time and reduced budget than enforce expensive-to-prosecute file-sharing laws. The smug teen plays the files, deems them worthless crap and is glad her money was not wasted on artless, DRM-encumbered drek peddled by out-of-touch media distributors preying on artists they despise and teens they treat like godless terrorists. Later that day, she is molested and murdered by someone who HAS NEVER ILLEGALLY DOWNLOADED A FILE and who is never apprehended by the authorities because they are distracted by having to reply to repeated requests to enforce file-sharing laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A smug teen who 's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace ' and 'Tune Weasel ' finds his world unchanged when he , like millions of others , is never contacted by the authorities because , well , they have better things to do with their limited time and reduced budget than enforce expensive-to-prosecute file-sharing laws .
The smug teen plays the files , deems them worthless crap and is glad her money was not wasted on artless , DRM-encumbered drek peddled by out-of-touch media distributors preying on artists they despise and teens they treat like godless terrorists .
Later that day , she is molested and murdered by someone who HAS NEVER ILLEGALLY DOWNLOADED A FILE and who is never apprehended by the authorities because they are distracted by having to reply to repeated requests to enforce file-sharing laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world unchanged when he, like millions of others, is never contacted by the authorities because, well, they have better things to do with their limited time and reduced budget than enforce expensive-to-prosecute file-sharing laws.
The smug teen plays the files, deems them worthless crap and is glad her money was not wasted on artless, DRM-encumbered drek peddled by out-of-touch media distributors preying on artists they despise and teens they treat like godless terrorists.
Later that day, she is molested and murdered by someone who HAS NEVER ILLEGALLY DOWNLOADED A FILE and who is never apprehended by the authorities because they are distracted by having to reply to repeated requests to enforce file-sharing laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604127</id>
	<title>Another...</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1246903380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MC Lars' "Download this Song" also comes to mind<br>Hey, I can follow instructions.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p><p>"It's 2006, the consumer's still pissed<br>Won't take it anymore so I'm writing a list<br>Don't try to resist this paradigm shift<br>The music revolution cannot be dismissed"</p><p>"You know, we just wanted a level playing field.<br>You've overcharged us for music for years, and now we're<br>Just trying to find a fair balance. I hate to say it, but...<br>Welcome to the future."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MC Lars ' " Download this Song " also comes to mindHey , I can follow instructions .
: P " It 's 2006 , the consumer 's still pissedWo n't take it anymore so I 'm writing a listDo n't try to resist this paradigm shiftThe music revolution can not be dismissed " " You know , we just wanted a level playing field.You 've overcharged us for music for years , and now we'reJust trying to find a fair balance .
I hate to say it , but...Welcome to the future .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MC Lars' "Download this Song" also comes to mindHey, I can follow instructions.
:P"It's 2006, the consumer's still pissedWon't take it anymore so I'm writing a listDon't try to resist this paradigm shiftThe music revolution cannot be dismissed""You know, we just wanted a level playing field.You've overcharged us for music for years, and now we'reJust trying to find a fair balance.
I hate to say it, but...Welcome to the future.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28612251</id>
	<title>Best response...</title>
	<author>clambake</author>
	<datestamp>1246997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some one needs to make the response video:  Greedy RIAA representatives being hauled in front of the guillotine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some one needs to make the response video : Greedy RIAA representatives being hauled in front of the guillotine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some one needs to make the response video:  Greedy RIAA representatives being hauled in front of the guillotine...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606145</id>
	<title>didn't watch the video</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1246971900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary is leaving me confused. Is this an amateur video satirizing the RIAA or is this really from an anti-copyright infringement group?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is leaving me confused .
Is this an amateur video satirizing the RIAA or is this really from an anti-copyright infringement group ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is leaving me confused.
Is this an amateur video satirizing the RIAA or is this really from an anti-copyright infringement group?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28609397</id>
	<title>Not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246986360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I'll buy the latest game, crack it's copy protection, make 1000 clearly marked copies, and leave them lying around on school campuses. Fuck the software companies, fuck the RIAA/MPAA, and fuck copyright laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'll buy the latest game , crack it 's copy protection , make 1000 clearly marked copies , and leave them lying around on school campuses .
Fuck the software companies , fuck the RIAA/MPAA , and fuck copyright laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'll buy the latest game, crack it's copy protection, make 1000 clearly marked copies, and leave them lying around on school campuses.
Fuck the software companies, fuck the RIAA/MPAA, and fuck copyright laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28707895</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247650260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is so insulting to community colleges.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is so insulting to community colleges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is so insulting to community colleges.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603515</id>
	<title>Utopia for RIA and MPAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246897500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This represents Utopia for the RIAA and MPAA and SIIA weasels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This represents Utopia for the RIAA and MPAA and SIIA weasels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This represents Utopia for the RIAA and MPAA and SIIA weasels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613331</id>
	<title>Re:Many, MANY inaccuracies in this video!</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1246958640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2. I thought that was the point of the video. If the RIAA keeps having their way it'll be true. Think if all the people committing 'copycrime' were actually imprisoned then the prisons would be FILLED with anime nerds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 .
I thought that was the point of the video .
If the RIAA keeps having their way it 'll be true .
Think if all the people committing 'copycrime ' were actually imprisoned then the prisons would be FILLED with anime nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2.
I thought that was the point of the video.
If the RIAA keeps having their way it'll be true.
Think if all the people committing 'copycrime' were actually imprisoned then the prisons would be FILLED with anime nerds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605977</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1246970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of the time a reviewer described Hot Fuzz as from the creators of "BBC4's <i>Spaced</i>". Aside from the dubious notion that every channel in the UK must be the Beeb, the juxtaposition of <i>Spaced</i> and <i>The Secret Life of Corners</i> tickled me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the time a reviewer described Hot Fuzz as from the creators of " BBC4 's Spaced " .
Aside from the dubious notion that every channel in the UK must be the Beeb , the juxtaposition of Spaced and The Secret Life of Corners tickled me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the time a reviewer described Hot Fuzz as from the creators of "BBC4's Spaced".
Aside from the dubious notion that every channel in the UK must be the Beeb, the juxtaposition of Spaced and The Secret Life of Corners tickled me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603431</id>
	<title>And now... our corporate anthem...</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1246896960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do what's best for the corporation... or we'll throw your ass in jail.</p><p>What a joke...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do what 's best for the corporation... or we 'll throw your ass in jail.What a joke.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do what's best for the corporation... or we'll throw your ass in jail.What a joke...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608087</id>
	<title>I love how...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246981260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how they use the coercive threat of prison violence.  These days it's just accepted as fact that the prison system is completely and utterly broken beyond repair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how they use the coercive threat of prison violence .
These days it 's just accepted as fact that the prison system is completely and utterly broken beyond repair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how they use the coercive threat of prison violence.
These days it's just accepted as fact that the prison system is completely and utterly broken beyond repair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603921</id>
	<title>Link to original</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246900860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xfqkdh5Js4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xfqkdh5Js4</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = -Xfqkdh5Js4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xfqkdh5Js4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28627077</id>
	<title>I'm confused.....</title>
	<author>LittleGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1247084880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... what will deter those illegal downloaders who <i>like</i> Prison Rape?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... what will deter those illegal downloaders who like Prison Rape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... what will deter those illegal downloaders who like Prison Rape?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606447</id>
	<title>You may be on to something</title>
	<author>Voyager529</author>
	<datestamp>1246973880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if the next 50 Cent could get street cred for music swapping:</p><p> <i>Went onto Limewire</i></p><p>
Got caught swappin' songs</p><p>
Got five years in prison</p><p>
And some tats on my arms </p><p>Then add some f-words and n**ga references for good measure...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the next 50 Cent could get street cred for music swapping : Went onto Limewire Got caught swappin ' songs Got five years in prison And some tats on my arms Then add some f-words and n * * ga references for good measure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the next 50 Cent could get street cred for music swapping: Went onto Limewire
Got caught swappin' songs
Got five years in prison
And some tats on my arms Then add some f-words and n**ga references for good measure...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603203</id>
	<title>Confirmation?</title>
	<author>basementman</author>
	<datestamp>1246895280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can anyone provide a link to confirm that the SIIA is actually making this? The trailer jumped the shark when the kid started spinning the CD endlessly on his finger, so my first impression would be that it is a parody of the original.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can anyone provide a link to confirm that the SIIA is actually making this ?
The trailer jumped the shark when the kid started spinning the CD endlessly on his finger , so my first impression would be that it is a parody of the original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can anyone provide a link to confirm that the SIIA is actually making this?
The trailer jumped the shark when the kid started spinning the CD endlessly on his finger, so my first impression would be that it is a parody of the original.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604699</id>
	<title>Copying games is not a major problem now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to buy games for the PC because it was the easiest and fastest way to play a video game. I wouldn't have to wait several hours/days to download a pirated game, run through several days of trying out various hack and patches. And because I like to play the games again in a few years, it had a good chance of working with a newer version of windows once you downloaded the latest patch.</p><p>Now I don't buy games for the PC, because it takes days of trying out various pseudo patches or because some games have various digital rights managements that only gives you a limited number of installs (Bioshock - which I bought and have never played), or something equally stupid with the latest DRM. I theorize it now easier to play a pirated game then it is to get a legal copy to work.</p><p>Steam is the future of game distribution, but that's the thing. I am willing to run my games off Steam, but I don't want my PC to be cluttered with a dozen products like Steam just so I can play the games that Steam doesn't distribute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to buy games for the PC because it was the easiest and fastest way to play a video game .
I would n't have to wait several hours/days to download a pirated game , run through several days of trying out various hack and patches .
And because I like to play the games again in a few years , it had a good chance of working with a newer version of windows once you downloaded the latest patch.Now I do n't buy games for the PC , because it takes days of trying out various pseudo patches or because some games have various digital rights managements that only gives you a limited number of installs ( Bioshock - which I bought and have never played ) , or something equally stupid with the latest DRM .
I theorize it now easier to play a pirated game then it is to get a legal copy to work.Steam is the future of game distribution , but that 's the thing .
I am willing to run my games off Steam , but I do n't want my PC to be cluttered with a dozen products like Steam just so I can play the games that Steam does n't distribute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to buy games for the PC because it was the easiest and fastest way to play a video game.
I wouldn't have to wait several hours/days to download a pirated game, run through several days of trying out various hack and patches.
And because I like to play the games again in a few years, it had a good chance of working with a newer version of windows once you downloaded the latest patch.Now I don't buy games for the PC, because it takes days of trying out various pseudo patches or because some games have various digital rights managements that only gives you a limited number of installs (Bioshock - which I bought and have never played), or something equally stupid with the latest DRM.
I theorize it now easier to play a pirated game then it is to get a legal copy to work.Steam is the future of game distribution, but that's the thing.
I am willing to run my games off Steam, but I don't want my PC to be cluttered with a dozen products like Steam just so I can play the games that Steam doesn't distribute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603787</id>
	<title>A message from the all powerful Thulsa Doom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246899600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"My child, you have come to me my son. For who now is your father if it is not me? I am the well spring, from which you flow. When I am gone, you will have never been. What would your world be, without me? My son." - Thulsa Doom<br> <br>Get down on your fucking knees and pray for forgiveness, mortal. It is only by His grace that you are allowed to awake daily to fulfill your meager 'needs'<br> <br>If you had one iota of intelligence you'd recognize Thulsa Doom as the provider for your desire to live. Only by His guidance can you come to the true meaning of strength!<br> <br>THULSA DOOM!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" My child , you have come to me my son .
For who now is your father if it is not me ?
I am the well spring , from which you flow .
When I am gone , you will have never been .
What would your world be , without me ?
My son .
" - Thulsa Doom Get down on your fucking knees and pray for forgiveness , mortal .
It is only by His grace that you are allowed to awake daily to fulfill your meager 'needs ' If you had one iota of intelligence you 'd recognize Thulsa Doom as the provider for your desire to live .
Only by His guidance can you come to the true meaning of strength !
THULSA DOOM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"My child, you have come to me my son.
For who now is your father if it is not me?
I am the well spring, from which you flow.
When I am gone, you will have never been.
What would your world be, without me?
My son.
" - Thulsa Doom Get down on your fucking knees and pray for forgiveness, mortal.
It is only by His grace that you are allowed to awake daily to fulfill your meager 'needs' If you had one iota of intelligence you'd recognize Thulsa Doom as the provider for your desire to live.
Only by His guidance can you come to the true meaning of strength!
THULSA DOOM!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605591</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous stuff</title>
	<author>xarragon</author>
	<datestamp>1246964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, and in effect boycott RIAA/MPAA products? That's probably even worse than piracy, since with piracy they can still get money from you via legal extortion. Boycotting on the other hand, that's... TERRORISM!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , and in effect boycott RIAA/MPAA products ?
That 's probably even worse than piracy , since with piracy they can still get money from you via legal extortion .
Boycotting on the other hand , that 's... TERRORISM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, and in effect boycott RIAA/MPAA products?
That's probably even worse than piracy, since with piracy they can still get money from you via legal extortion.
Boycotting on the other hand, that's... TERRORISM!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604695</id>
	<title>Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, copyright violates YOU.</p><p>No, wait, that's not ISR... Something's not working out here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , copyright violates YOU.No , wait , that 's not ISR... Something 's not working out here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, copyright violates YOU.No, wait, that's not ISR... Something's not working out here...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495</id>
	<title>Re:A better video</title>
	<author>FrostedWheat</author>
	<datestamp>1246908480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing to do with the BBC. It's on Channel 4.<br>The only good program on the entire channel<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing to do with the BBC .
It 's on Channel 4.The only good program on the entire channel ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing to do with the BBC.
It's on Channel 4.The only good program on the entire channel ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603727</id>
	<title>We've seen these tactics before...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246899000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've seen these tactics before - it's the same thing with people trying to stop us from shoplifting.  What a bunch of douchbags.  Walmart has plenty of money.  And they use slave-labor in third-world countries.  I should be allowed to stick it to the man.  Screw them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've seen these tactics before - it 's the same thing with people trying to stop us from shoplifting .
What a bunch of douchbags .
Walmart has plenty of money .
And they use slave-labor in third-world countries .
I should be allowed to stick it to the man .
Screw them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've seen these tactics before - it's the same thing with people trying to stop us from shoplifting.
What a bunch of douchbags.
Walmart has plenty of money.
And they use slave-labor in third-world countries.
I should be allowed to stick it to the man.
Screw them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603303</id>
	<title>public service raps to improve morals of the *IAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246895940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need some public service announcement raps to improve the morals of the *IAA.</p><p>Don't litigate our children, the deceased, and the poor.<br>That song is just a dolla, not $80K, not more.<br>Get a businees model, for ya internets and tubes.<br>Or we goin' digital, without ya freakin fools.</p><p>Vanilla Ice available ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need some public service announcement raps to improve the morals of the * IAA.Do n't litigate our children , the deceased , and the poor.That song is just a dolla , not $ 80K , not more.Get a businees model , for ya internets and tubes.Or we goin ' digital , without ya freakin fools.Vanilla Ice available ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need some public service announcement raps to improve the morals of the *IAA.Don't litigate our children, the deceased, and the poor.That song is just a dolla, not $80K, not more.Get a businees model, for ya internets and tubes.Or we goin' digital, without ya freakin fools.Vanilla Ice available ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603475</id>
	<title>Re:DP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246897260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be MC Double <b>Dong</b> "DP".</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be MC Double Dong " DP " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be MC Double Dong "DP".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605911</id>
	<title>If you run linux...</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1246969440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MC Double Def DP wouldn't be able to get into your PC in the first place!</htmltext>
<tokenext>MC Double Def DP would n't be able to get into your PC in the first place !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MC Double Def DP wouldn't be able to get into your PC in the first place!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604025</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Spikeles</author>
	<datestamp>1246902000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Huh, that's funny. Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Depends on how much you copied costs at retail.
</p><p> <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/17-18red.htm" title="usdoj.gov">The No Electronic Theft ("NET") Act, 17 U.S.C</a> [usdoj.gov]
</p><p> (a) Criminal Infringement.--Any person who infringes a copyright willfully:</p><ol> <li><p>for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or</p></li><li>by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000, shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement. </li></ol></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , that 's funny .
Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement .
Depends on how much you copied costs at retail .
The No Electronic Theft ( " NET " ) Act , 17 U.S.C [ usdoj.gov ] ( a ) Criminal Infringement.--Any person who infringes a copyright willfully : for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain , orby the reproduction or distribution , including by electronic means , during any 180-day period , of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works , which have a total retail value of more than $ 1,000 , shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18 .
For purposes of this subsection , evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work , by itself , shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh, that's funny.
Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.
Depends on how much you copied costs at retail.
The No Electronic Theft ("NET") Act, 17 U.S.C [usdoj.gov]
 (a) Criminal Infringement.--Any person who infringes a copyright willfully: for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, orby the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000, shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18.
For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603813</id>
	<title>The GNU Rap</title>
	<author>yams</author>
	<datestamp>1246899840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard\_Stallman" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">RMS</a> [wikipedia.org] could create a parody that goes like "Copy this...., this is NOT a crime". I'm sure it would be a big hit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe RMS [ wikipedia.org ] could create a parody that goes like " Copy this.... , this is NOT a crime " .
I 'm sure it would be a big hit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe RMS [wikipedia.org] could create a parody that goes like "Copy this...., this is NOT a crime".
I'm sure it would be a big hit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603481</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246897260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a copyright crime you wouldn't get that type of federal prison.  You would be sent to a Federal Prison Camp (FPC) where there are no cells, locked doors or fences.  This would be a pure "club-fed" sentence.  The feds are not going to spend money on high security for a copyright conviction.  I would be greatly surprised if they did "time" at all, just probation and a fine.</p><p>I did over three years in a FPC for phacking Sprint back in '87 for $30M in phone calls (Z-Tell anyone?) so I do know what I'm talking about here.</p><p>I'm posting anon because I'm looking for a job and this is the Internet and all, but I have a very low four digit ID here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a copyright crime you would n't get that type of federal prison .
You would be sent to a Federal Prison Camp ( FPC ) where there are no cells , locked doors or fences .
This would be a pure " club-fed " sentence .
The feds are not going to spend money on high security for a copyright conviction .
I would be greatly surprised if they did " time " at all , just probation and a fine.I did over three years in a FPC for phacking Sprint back in '87 for $ 30M in phone calls ( Z-Tell anyone ?
) so I do know what I 'm talking about here.I 'm posting anon because I 'm looking for a job and this is the Internet and all , but I have a very low four digit ID here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a copyright crime you wouldn't get that type of federal prison.
You would be sent to a Federal Prison Camp (FPC) where there are no cells, locked doors or fences.
This would be a pure "club-fed" sentence.
The feds are not going to spend money on high security for a copyright conviction.
I would be greatly surprised if they did "time" at all, just probation and a fine.I did over three years in a FPC for phacking Sprint back in '87 for $30M in phone calls (Z-Tell anyone?
) so I do know what I'm talking about here.I'm posting anon because I'm looking for a job and this is the Internet and all, but I have a very low four digit ID here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837</id>
	<title>Many, MANY inaccuracies in this video!</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1246900020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought I would point out the many inaccuracies in this film:</p><p>1. The mother was fighting back to the evil paramilitary force that, without warning, smashed down her door and entered her house. She would have been shot because she clearly "endangered" the armed men's life.</p><p>2. ANIME ANGEL TATOOS? In an American prison??? I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...</p><p>The phrase "copycrime" really reminded me of "thoughtcrime" from 1984, which isn't a good message propaganda should be sending...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought I would point out the many inaccuracies in this film : 1 .
The mother was fighting back to the evil paramilitary force that , without warning , smashed down her door and entered her house .
She would have been shot because she clearly " endangered " the armed men 's life.2 .
ANIME ANGEL TATOOS ?
In an American prison ? ? ?
I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...The phrase " copycrime " really reminded me of " thoughtcrime " from 1984 , which is n't a good message propaganda should be sending.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought I would point out the many inaccuracies in this film:1.
The mother was fighting back to the evil paramilitary force that, without warning, smashed down her door and entered her house.
She would have been shot because she clearly "endangered" the armed men's life.2.
ANIME ANGEL TATOOS?
In an American prison???
I doubt there are any anime nerds in lockup...The phrase "copycrime" really reminded me of "thoughtcrime" from 1984, which isn't a good message propaganda should be sending...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604795</id>
	<title>Wait a minute...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246998600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rappers, appealing to a sense of right and wrong?  Surely, this story is a fake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rappers , appealing to a sense of right and wrong ?
Surely , this story is a fake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rappers, appealing to a sense of right and wrong?
Surely, this story is a fake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604289</id>
	<title>Is anybody surprised?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246905420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly, there's very few PSA that don't send me into a rage.  I see that one with the kid who dropped out of High School trying to buy a wallet and this Asian couple laughing at him, and I just want to slap every member of the Ad Council.</p><p>Not only was High School a waste of time for me, that only caused me pain and sorrow, but, and this is important, I find the use of the two store personnel speaking in a foreign language to be racist and discriminatory.</p><p>That PSA should be banned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , there 's very few PSA that do n't send me into a rage .
I see that one with the kid who dropped out of High School trying to buy a wallet and this Asian couple laughing at him , and I just want to slap every member of the Ad Council.Not only was High School a waste of time for me , that only caused me pain and sorrow , but , and this is important , I find the use of the two store personnel speaking in a foreign language to be racist and discriminatory.That PSA should be banned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, there's very few PSA that don't send me into a rage.
I see that one with the kid who dropped out of High School trying to buy a wallet and this Asian couple laughing at him, and I just want to slap every member of the Ad Council.Not only was High School a waste of time for me, that only caused me pain and sorrow, but, and this is important, I find the use of the two store personnel speaking in a foreign language to be racist and discriminatory.That PSA should be banned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603847</id>
	<title>SIIA kills a kitten</title>
	<author>icomxwing</author>
	<datestamp>1246900200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>every time you dl a game the SIIA kills a kitten</htmltext>
<tokenext>every time you dl a game the SIIA kills a kitten</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every time you dl a game the SIIA kills a kitten</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605423</id>
	<title>Looks like a joke</title>
	<author>stoutpuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1246963140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The type of people this is intended to intimidate/scare away from getting into piracy couldn't buy anymore software than they already do, and any of them already committing piracy world likely remain unaffected.

From an economical point of view the means that the youngsters using this software are indeed having a 'free lunch', aka increased consumer surplus, but not at the cost of producer surplus.

I don't know what kind of moron they report to, to (need to) produce such a fire-and-miss from the behemoth that is the anti-piracy gun.

Surely this is another anti-piracy parody, but then again they do tend to be pretty unintelligent to begin with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The type of people this is intended to intimidate/scare away from getting into piracy could n't buy anymore software than they already do , and any of them already committing piracy world likely remain unaffected .
From an economical point of view the means that the youngsters using this software are indeed having a 'free lunch ' , aka increased consumer surplus , but not at the cost of producer surplus .
I do n't know what kind of moron they report to , to ( need to ) produce such a fire-and-miss from the behemoth that is the anti-piracy gun .
Surely this is another anti-piracy parody , but then again they do tend to be pretty unintelligent to begin with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The type of people this is intended to intimidate/scare away from getting into piracy couldn't buy anymore software than they already do, and any of them already committing piracy world likely remain unaffected.
From an economical point of view the means that the youngsters using this software are indeed having a 'free lunch', aka increased consumer surplus, but not at the cost of producer surplus.
I don't know what kind of moron they report to, to (need to) produce such a fire-and-miss from the behemoth that is the anti-piracy gun.
Surely this is another anti-piracy parody, but then again they do tend to be pretty unintelligent to begin with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603677</id>
	<title>Exactly what I was Thinking!</title>
	<author>ZirconCode</author>
	<datestamp>1246898580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The IT Crowd was my very first thought!</p><p>It's sad though to see this VERY VERY satani *cough* satireistic movie become reality.</p><p>And doesn't the government get at least a little mad? Last time I checked their prison system wasn't supposed to be depicted like that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The IT Crowd was my very first thought ! It 's sad though to see this VERY VERY satani * cough * satireistic movie become reality.And does n't the government get at least a little mad ?
Last time I checked their prison system was n't supposed to be depicted like that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The IT Crowd was my very first thought!It's sad though to see this VERY VERY satani *cough* satireistic movie become reality.And doesn't the government get at least a little mad?
Last time I checked their prison system wasn't supposed to be depicted like that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28609713</id>
	<title>This happened to my next door neighbor ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246987620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... while I was downloading stuff through their unsecured WiFi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... while I was downloading stuff through their unsecured WiFi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... while I was downloading stuff through their unsecured WiFi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603289</id>
	<title>Well, of course.</title>
	<author>Nebulious</author>
	<datestamp>1246895820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How else can he afford another solid gold Humvee?  And diamond studded swimming pools?  These things don't grow on trees.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How else can he afford another solid gold Humvee ?
And diamond studded swimming pools ?
These things do n't grow on trees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How else can he afford another solid gold Humvee?
And diamond studded swimming pools?
These things don't grow on trees.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603357</id>
	<title>What I learned</title>
	<author>ChinaLumberjack</author>
	<datestamp>1246896360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Woah!
I just learned that you can copy digital media!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Woah !
I just learned that you can copy digital media ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Woah!
I just learned that you can copy digital media!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603275</id>
	<title>For workers revolution against capitalist insanity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246895760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reforge the Fourth International, world party of socialist revolution!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reforge the Fourth International , world party of socialist revolution !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reforge the Fourth International, world party of socialist revolution!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604757</id>
	<title>HOLY SHIT I thought it was CollegeHumor</title>
	<author>Nicolas MONNET</author>
	<datestamp>1246998000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right up until the end I thought it was a moderately funny (ok, not even that funny) CollegeHumor video or something. Then I realised it's serious. Holy shit. Who are these people? They're among us, but they're not like us. They have no sense of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ridicule? Shame?<br>They're not human.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right up until the end I thought it was a moderately funny ( ok , not even that funny ) CollegeHumor video or something .
Then I realised it 's serious .
Holy shit .
Who are these people ?
They 're among us , but they 're not like us .
They have no sense of ... ridicule ? Shame ? They 're not human .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right up until the end I thought it was a moderately funny (ok, not even that funny) CollegeHumor video or something.
Then I realised it's serious.
Holy shit.
Who are these people?
They're among us, but they're not like us.
They have no sense of ... ridicule? Shame?They're not human.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607817</id>
	<title>Don't write software that plays DRMed movies</title>
	<author>Sloppy</author>
	<datestamp>1246980240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a crime (DMCA)!  Please, we appeal to your sense of right and wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a crime ( DMCA ) !
Please , we appeal to your sense of right and wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a crime (DMCA)!
Please, we appeal to your sense of right and wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608889</id>
	<title>does anyone know</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246984380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what torrent i can get this video from?</p><p>thanks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what torrent i can get this video from ? thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what torrent i can get this video from?thanks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183</id>
	<title>DP</title>
	<author>tnok85</author>
	<datestamp>1246895160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or does MC Double Def "DP" sound like a black porn star's stage name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or does MC Double Def " DP " sound like a black porn star 's stage name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or does MC Double Def "DP" sound like a black porn star's stage name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604147</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246903740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Not being able to go to college"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... WTF? So you would not send him to jail but would ruin his whole life forever. Get real, the courts should concentrate on real crimes, like rape, murder and physical theft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Not being able to go to college " ... WTF ? So you would not send him to jail but would ruin his whole life forever .
Get real , the courts should concentrate on real crimes , like rape , murder and physical theft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Not being able to go to college" ... WTF? So you would not send him to jail but would ruin his whole life forever.
Get real, the courts should concentrate on real crimes, like rape, murder and physical theft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604913</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246999800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd guess it'll be one of the few songs you won't be able to find a single torrent of, or at least no good seeds. In my experience, the quality of the product is in direct relation to the amount of seeders. So in this case I'd expect one: The SIIA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd guess it 'll be one of the few songs you wo n't be able to find a single torrent of , or at least no good seeds .
In my experience , the quality of the product is in direct relation to the amount of seeders .
So in this case I 'd expect one : The SIIA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd guess it'll be one of the few songs you won't be able to find a single torrent of, or at least no good seeds.
In my experience, the quality of the product is in direct relation to the amount of seeders.
So in this case I'd expect one: The SIIA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604843</id>
	<title>Re:Don't download this song</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246999080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great song, where can I download it?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great song , where can I download it ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great song, where can I download it?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603511</id>
	<title>This could be YOU!</title>
	<author>ShadowWraith</author>
	<datestamp>1246897500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Both illegal downloaders and the music industry know that it is pretty much impossible to sue every filesharer. This knowledge is basically what keeps filesharers going. The only reason that organizations like the SIAA sue individual parties for ridiculous sums of money is to induce fear in the overwhelming majority of filesharers and thereby cut down filesharing as much as possible by pure psychology. Coupling this video with the real-life verdicts carried out on a few of the millions of filesharers will effectively cause many eleven-year-olds to piss their pants in fear and not download that album.
What the SIAA doesn't realize that the average eleven-year-old that will actually be intimidated by this will probably not BUY any albums either, and that almost all filesharers will simply see through the scare tactics and filesharing will live on. Therefore, what this amounts to is just a ton of money wasted by the SIAA on a stupid music video that will at best serve  to entertain the public on youtube.
The SIAA made a good move with their first video from the 90s; they appealed to people's sense of morality, detailing how much work is put into a game and why it is worth it to support the creators. Though appealing to conscience wouldn't stop all filesharing, people would at least feel moved  to pay for games (or other media) that they enjoyed, supporting an industry of quality. I do not know why they have resorted to useless fearmongering instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Both illegal downloaders and the music industry know that it is pretty much impossible to sue every filesharer .
This knowledge is basically what keeps filesharers going .
The only reason that organizations like the SIAA sue individual parties for ridiculous sums of money is to induce fear in the overwhelming majority of filesharers and thereby cut down filesharing as much as possible by pure psychology .
Coupling this video with the real-life verdicts carried out on a few of the millions of filesharers will effectively cause many eleven-year-olds to piss their pants in fear and not download that album .
What the SIAA does n't realize that the average eleven-year-old that will actually be intimidated by this will probably not BUY any albums either , and that almost all filesharers will simply see through the scare tactics and filesharing will live on .
Therefore , what this amounts to is just a ton of money wasted by the SIAA on a stupid music video that will at best serve to entertain the public on youtube .
The SIAA made a good move with their first video from the 90s ; they appealed to people 's sense of morality , detailing how much work is put into a game and why it is worth it to support the creators .
Though appealing to conscience would n't stop all filesharing , people would at least feel moved to pay for games ( or other media ) that they enjoyed , supporting an industry of quality .
I do not know why they have resorted to useless fearmongering instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both illegal downloaders and the music industry know that it is pretty much impossible to sue every filesharer.
This knowledge is basically what keeps filesharers going.
The only reason that organizations like the SIAA sue individual parties for ridiculous sums of money is to induce fear in the overwhelming majority of filesharers and thereby cut down filesharing as much as possible by pure psychology.
Coupling this video with the real-life verdicts carried out on a few of the millions of filesharers will effectively cause many eleven-year-olds to piss their pants in fear and not download that album.
What the SIAA doesn't realize that the average eleven-year-old that will actually be intimidated by this will probably not BUY any albums either, and that almost all filesharers will simply see through the scare tactics and filesharing will live on.
Therefore, what this amounts to is just a ton of money wasted by the SIAA on a stupid music video that will at best serve  to entertain the public on youtube.
The SIAA made a good move with their first video from the 90s; they appealed to people's sense of morality, detailing how much work is put into a game and why it is worth it to support the creators.
Though appealing to conscience wouldn't stop all filesharing, people would at least feel moved  to pay for games (or other media) that they enjoyed, supporting an industry of quality.
I do not know why they have resorted to useless fearmongering instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606767</id>
	<title>Sounds like all of Madofs investments....</title>
	<author>cheekyboy</author>
	<datestamp>1246975860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, is there a Maddof connection here?</p><p>Why is goggle part of this, is it possible to even pirate google software? I bet its impossible.</p><p>Stupid twits, probly joined because they were playing golf with some ceos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , is there a Maddof connection here ? Why is goggle part of this , is it possible to even pirate google software ?
I bet its impossible.Stupid twits , probly joined because they were playing golf with some ceos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, is there a Maddof connection here?Why is goggle part of this, is it possible to even pirate google software?
I bet its impossible.Stupid twits, probly joined because they were playing golf with some ceos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28627245</id>
	<title>In commemoration of Smug Teen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247085540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world <b>got flipped</b> turned upside down and I'd like to take a minute, just sit right there.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A smug teen who 's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace ' and 'Tune Weasel ' finds his world got flipped turned upside down and I 'd like to take a minute , just sit right there.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world got flipped turned upside down and I'd like to take a minute, just sit right there.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605761</id>
	<title>Re: DP</title>
	<author>meist3r</author>
	<datestamp>1246967520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew I'd seen that guy and the mom before<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew I 'd seen that guy and the mom before .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew I'd seen that guy and the mom before ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</id>
	<title>Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246895220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs. The teen <b>finds himself in a prison jumpsuit</b> forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him</p></div><p>Huh, that's funny.  Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.  Search warrants?  For your computer maybe.  Serving papers for a court date?  Sure.  Arrested on the spot?  Don't think so.  Jail time?  Not to my knowledge.  The only legal consequence <a href="http://www.siia.net/index.php?option=com\_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=345:consequences-of-software-piracy&amp;catid=162:anti-piracy-articles&amp;Itemid=373" title="siia.net" rel="nofollow">the SIIA lists on their site</a> [siia.net] are "significant fines for copyright infringement."  Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I don't think he'll be doing time.  <br> <br>  Maybe they should do a little more research before they imply that you will end up in a gulag tattooing cartoon characters on convicts?  <br> <br>

Don't get me wrong, I'd be fine with the kid (assuming he's 18+) getting a letter in the mail saying he has to appear in court and then a slow five year montage ending with him settling out of court and not being able to go to college or only attending a community college.  That'd be pretty realistic.  I still don't agree with it but that's how it works these days.  Who knows?  Maybe the over emphasized results will backfire on them and the general populace will see how unrealistic the charges are for copyright violation?  I mean, that's not going to change until a politician looks bad taking a sack of money in campaign contributions<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or realizes that it bothers his constituents that lives are being ruined over something that maybe isn't so serious that a person should be financially hobbled for the rest of their life or next seven years from bankruptcy or whatever results.  Huge fines are enough to stop me from copyright violations but lets face it, you're not going to jail if you do it.  You're not a hardened criminal with a rap sheet serving time next to murderers if you're convicted of file sharing.  You're most likely going to settle out of court and be financially stunted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A smug teen who 's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace ' and 'Tune Weasel ' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs .
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on himHuh , that 's funny .
Last I checked you normally do n't get jail time for copyright infringement .
Search warrants ?
For your computer maybe .
Serving papers for a court date ?
Sure. Arrested on the spot ?
Do n't think so .
Jail time ?
Not to my knowledge .
The only legal consequence the SIIA lists on their site [ siia.net ] are " significant fines for copyright infringement .
" Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N ' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I do n't think he 'll be doing time .
Maybe they should do a little more research before they imply that you will end up in a gulag tattooing cartoon characters on convicts ?
Do n't get me wrong , I 'd be fine with the kid ( assuming he 's 18 + ) getting a letter in the mail saying he has to appear in court and then a slow five year montage ending with him settling out of court and not being able to go to college or only attending a community college .
That 'd be pretty realistic .
I still do n't agree with it but that 's how it works these days .
Who knows ?
Maybe the over emphasized results will backfire on them and the general populace will see how unrealistic the charges are for copyright violation ?
I mean , that 's not going to change until a politician looks bad taking a sack of money in campaign contributions ... or realizes that it bothers his constituents that lives are being ruined over something that maybe is n't so serious that a person should be financially hobbled for the rest of their life or next seven years from bankruptcy or whatever results .
Huge fines are enough to stop me from copyright violations but lets face it , you 're not going to jail if you do it .
You 're not a hardened criminal with a rap sheet serving time next to murderers if you 're convicted of file sharing .
You 're most likely going to settle out of court and be financially stunted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A smug teen who's downloading files from 'Pirates Palace' and 'Tune Weasel' finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on himHuh, that's funny.
Last I checked you normally don't get jail time for copyright infringement.
Search warrants?
For your computer maybe.
Serving papers for a court date?
Sure.  Arrested on the spot?
Don't think so.
Jail time?
Not to my knowledge.
The only legal consequence the SIIA lists on their site [siia.net] are "significant fines for copyright infringement.
"  Unless the kid was uploading unreleased Guns N' Roses tracks or orchestrating the huge operation of The Pirate Bay I don't think he'll be doing time.
Maybe they should do a little more research before they imply that you will end up in a gulag tattooing cartoon characters on convicts?
Don't get me wrong, I'd be fine with the kid (assuming he's 18+) getting a letter in the mail saying he has to appear in court and then a slow five year montage ending with him settling out of court and not being able to go to college or only attending a community college.
That'd be pretty realistic.
I still don't agree with it but that's how it works these days.
Who knows?
Maybe the over emphasized results will backfire on them and the general populace will see how unrealistic the charges are for copyright violation?
I mean, that's not going to change until a politician looks bad taking a sack of money in campaign contributions ... or realizes that it bothers his constituents that lives are being ruined over something that maybe isn't so serious that a person should be financially hobbled for the rest of their life or next seven years from bankruptcy or whatever results.
Huge fines are enough to stop me from copyright violations but lets face it, you're not going to jail if you do it.
You're not a hardened criminal with a rap sheet serving time next to murderers if you're convicted of file sharing.
You're most likely going to settle out of court and be financially stunted.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604247</id>
	<title>Alternate version</title>
	<author>bitspotter</author>
	<datestamp>1246904940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn him on...</p><p>Wait, did that just say...?</p><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him...</p><p>oh. ok. right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; ...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn him on...Wait , did that just say... ? &gt; ...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him...oh .
ok. right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; ...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn him on...Wait, did that just say...?&gt; ...forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him...oh.
ok. right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603319</id>
	<title>Whew</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246896060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank God they got to me before I took a wrong turn in life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank God they got to me before I took a wrong turn in life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank God they got to me before I took a wrong turn in life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606923</id>
	<title>Re:is the entertainment industry</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1246976760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the author still describes Pirate Bay users as looters, as if they were breaking into stores at night or pretending they were the federal government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the author still describes Pirate Bay users as looters , as if they were breaking into stores at night or pretending they were the federal government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the author still describes Pirate Bay users as looters, as if they were breaking into stores at night or pretending they were the federal government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603213</id>
	<title>Dangerous stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246895340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs. The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell</p></div> </blockquote><p>The message I get from this is, "Wow, movies and music sound like dangerous stuff. I better avoid them at all costs whether purchased legally or not."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs .
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him , physically attack him , and make him run for his life back to his jail cell The message I get from this is , " Wow , movies and music sound like dangerous stuff .
I better avoid them at all costs whether purchased legally or not .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...finds his world turned upside down when automatic weapons-toting government agents break down the door and take his Mom away in handcuffs.
The teen finds himself in a prison jumpsuit forced to tattoo shirtless adult inmates who eventually turn on him, physically attack him, and make him run for his life back to his jail cell The message I get from this is, "Wow, movies and music sound like dangerous stuff.
I better avoid them at all costs whether purchased legally or not.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603133</id>
	<title>BILLY MAYS HERE...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246894800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...with scare tactics!<br>
<br>Seriously though, the first DCTF was happy and upbeat (and for good reason, as many people simply didn't know that copying a floppy was piracy). What happened to that feel? Are we really at a point where we're so influenced by the RIAA/MPAA's ways of doing things that SIIA's first sequel in 17 years immediately jumps to scare tactics?<br>
<br>Maybe it's just me, but I see this quickly becoming one of those "You wouldn't steal a car" type of
things - jumping to such an extreme that it becomes a satire piece.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...with scare tactics !
Seriously though , the first DCTF was happy and upbeat ( and for good reason , as many people simply did n't know that copying a floppy was piracy ) .
What happened to that feel ?
Are we really at a point where we 're so influenced by the RIAA/MPAA 's ways of doing things that SIIA 's first sequel in 17 years immediately jumps to scare tactics ?
Maybe it 's just me , but I see this quickly becoming one of those " You would n't steal a car " type of things - jumping to such an extreme that it becomes a satire piece .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...with scare tactics!
Seriously though, the first DCTF was happy and upbeat (and for good reason, as many people simply didn't know that copying a floppy was piracy).
What happened to that feel?
Are we really at a point where we're so influenced by the RIAA/MPAA's ways of doing things that SIIA's first sequel in 17 years immediately jumps to scare tactics?
Maybe it's just me, but I see this quickly becoming one of those "You wouldn't steal a car" type of
things - jumping to such an extreme that it becomes a satire piece.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419</id>
	<title>Where have I heard these scare tactics before?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246896780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, yeah, from the perpetual pro-pot propaganda pushers.<br> <br>
Who would like everyone to believe that every hour of every day, in every city in every state in this country, there are <i>evil, <b>evil,</b> </i> police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments based on individual rumors of the presence of pot.  Where of course then the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and sentenced to 5*10^30 years in prison for possession and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas, ostriches, elephants, and of course their cell mates - all of whom are convicted serial killers who will be released next week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , yeah , from the perpetual pro-pot propaganda pushers .
Who would like everyone to believe that every hour of every day , in every city in every state in this country , there are evil , evil , police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments based on individual rumors of the presence of pot .
Where of course then the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and sentenced to 5 * 10 ^ 30 years in prison for possession and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas , ostriches , elephants , and of course their cell mates - all of whom are convicted serial killers who will be released next week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, yeah, from the perpetual pro-pot propaganda pushers.
Who would like everyone to believe that every hour of every day, in every city in every state in this country, there are evil, evil,  police officers armed to the teeth kicking down doors of houses and apartments based on individual rumors of the presence of pot.
Where of course then the innocent pot smokers are immediately hauled off to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and sentenced to 5*10^30 years in prison for possession and repeatedly assaulted and ass-raped by gorillas, ostriches, elephants, and of course their cell mates - all of whom are convicted serial killers who will be released next week.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603405</id>
	<title>Huh</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1246896600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, watching that trailer my first response is "wow, they're douchefucks for doing that to someone over some media."<br> <br>Don't copy that floppy was funny and appealed to your sense of right and wrong/interest in supporting content creators so they'll be around to produce more good stuff. This just sounds like trying to scare people into line. Which can work, but it does rather rob you of any moral high ground when your argument is "or we'll fuck you up, put you in prison, and go after your family."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , watching that trailer my first response is " wow , they 're douchefucks for doing that to someone over some media .
" Do n't copy that floppy was funny and appealed to your sense of right and wrong/interest in supporting content creators so they 'll be around to produce more good stuff .
This just sounds like trying to scare people into line .
Which can work , but it does rather rob you of any moral high ground when your argument is " or we 'll fuck you up , put you in prison , and go after your family .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, watching that trailer my first response is "wow, they're douchefucks for doing that to someone over some media.
" Don't copy that floppy was funny and appealed to your sense of right and wrong/interest in supporting content creators so they'll be around to produce more good stuff.
This just sounds like trying to scare people into line.
Which can work, but it does rather rob you of any moral high ground when your argument is "or we'll fuck you up, put you in prison, and go after your family.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1246896120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a wet dream of the copyright owners that one day the police with fight a war on their behalf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a wet dream of the copyright owners that one day the police with fight a war on their behalf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a wet dream of the copyright owners that one day the police with fight a war on their behalf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608677</id>
	<title>Re:Since When Does Infringement Equal Jail Time?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246983540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't need to do research, they know perfectly well the realities of what happens. This is about scaring people, and not about giving a factual representation of events that might transpire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't need to do research , they know perfectly well the realities of what happens .
This is about scaring people , and not about giving a factual representation of events that might transpire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't need to do research, they know perfectly well the realities of what happens.
This is about scaring people, and not about giving a factual representation of events that might transpire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606093</id>
	<title>Weird Al did it first</title>
	<author>scharkalvin</author>
	<datestamp>1246971420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The description of the video sounds like Weird Al's "Don't download this song" video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The description of the video sounds like Weird Al 's " Do n't download this song " video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The description of the video sounds like Weird Al's "Don't download this song" video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603381</id>
	<title>Don't read this message</title>
	<author>cmburns69</author>
	<datestamp>1246896480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I know where they get their inspiration.  The description sounds just like the video for Weird Al's "Don't Download This Song": <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz-grdpKVqg" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz-grdpKVqg</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I know where they get their inspiration .
The description sounds just like the video for Weird Al 's " Do n't Download This Song " : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Yz-grdpKVqg [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I know where they get their inspiration.
The description sounds just like the video for Weird Al's "Don't Download This Song": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz-grdpKVqg [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604533</id>
	<title>It scared me</title>
	<author>thofle</author>
	<datestamp>1246908900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone know of any good "learn how to tattoo" torrents?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know of any good " learn how to tattoo " torrents ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know of any good "learn how to tattoo" torrents?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607037</id>
	<title>New Jacko</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246977360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Michael Jackson dead, I guess we need something else to scare the kids to sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Michael Jackson dead , I guess we need something else to scare the kids to sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Michael Jackson dead, I guess we need something else to scare the kids to sleep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603669</id>
	<title>Anti-piracy advocates should be banned!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246898520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>anti-piracy advocates should be banned!
paid by our taxes to solve a unsolvable thing, it's not even a crime as not everyone is doing it.

and saying it is so is just criminalizing others, and this pointing fingers will cause people to join torrent sites and promote piracy.
the more you prosecute the more people will pirate, as counter productive as the war on drugs (also paid by your tax money...)

the majority of people buy (end of story).</htmltext>
<tokenext>anti-piracy advocates should be banned !
paid by our taxes to solve a unsolvable thing , it 's not even a crime as not everyone is doing it .
and saying it is so is just criminalizing others , and this pointing fingers will cause people to join torrent sites and promote piracy .
the more you prosecute the more people will pirate , as counter productive as the war on drugs ( also paid by your tax money... ) the majority of people buy ( end of story ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anti-piracy advocates should be banned!
paid by our taxes to solve a unsolvable thing, it's not even a crime as not everyone is doing it.
and saying it is so is just criminalizing others, and this pointing fingers will cause people to join torrent sites and promote piracy.
the more you prosecute the more people will pirate, as counter productive as the war on drugs (also paid by your tax money...)

the majority of people buy (end of story).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603243</id>
	<title>Anybody else have a flashback...</title>
	<author>cranky\_chemist</author>
	<datestamp>1246895520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to the "federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison" scene from Office Space?

This is meant as humor, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>to the " federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison " scene from Office Space ?
This is meant as humor , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the "federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison" scene from Office Space?
This is meant as humor, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28609321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28707895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_07_0024224_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604645
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603241
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28607099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604231
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604005
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604695
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604127
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604495
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28608677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603329
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28605503
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28604025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28609321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28707895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28610727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28606923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28613179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_07_0024224.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_07_0024224.28603847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
