<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_05_2122237</id>
	<title>Bugatti's Latest Veyron, Most Ridiculous Car on the Planet?</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246810980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Wired has an amusing writeup that accurately captures the most recent ridiculous <a href="http://www.wired.com/reviews/product/pr\_veyron\_convertible">addition to Bugatti's automobile catalog</a>.  The $2.1 million Veyron sports over 1,000 horsepower, a 16-cylinder engine, and a top speed of 245 mph.  The guilty conscience comes for free.  <i>"That same cash-filled briefcase could buy seven Ferrari 599s or every single 2009 model Mercedes. You could snap up a top-shelf Maybach and employ a chauffeur until well past the apocalypse. Hell, in this economy, $2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wired has an amusing writeup that accurately captures the most recent ridiculous addition to Bugatti 's automobile catalog .
The $ 2.1 million Veyron sports over 1,000 horsepower , a 16-cylinder engine , and a top speed of 245 mph .
The guilty conscience comes for free .
" That same cash-filled briefcase could buy seven Ferrari 599s or every single 2009 model Mercedes .
You could snap up a top-shelf Maybach and employ a chauffeur until well past the apocalypse .
Hell , in this economy , $ 2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wired has an amusing writeup that accurately captures the most recent ridiculous addition to Bugatti's automobile catalog.
The $2.1 million Veyron sports over 1,000 horsepower, a 16-cylinder engine, and a top speed of 245 mph.
The guilty conscience comes for free.
"That same cash-filled briefcase could buy seven Ferrari 599s or every single 2009 model Mercedes.
You could snap up a top-shelf Maybach and employ a chauffeur until well past the apocalypse.
Hell, in this economy, $2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596965</id>
	<title>Can I get a fake identity with that?</title>
	<author>BurzumNazgul</author>
	<datestamp>1246906200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you can afford this (totallysexyomgamazing) car you should consider investing in a second identity for speeding tickets. That way you can keep your insurance to about the average Joe's mortgage payment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can afford this ( totallysexyomgamazing ) car you should consider investing in a second identity for speeding tickets .
That way you can keep your insurance to about the average Joe 's mortgage payment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can afford this (totallysexyomgamazing) car you should consider investing in a second identity for speeding tickets.
That way you can keep your insurance to about the average Joe's mortgage payment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28597473</id>
	<title>MUX wired and ready</title>
	<author>Maniacal</author>
	<datestamp>1246908300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a bunch of photos in TFA.  One is a close-up of the dashboard.  It took me a few looks to realize it said "AUX 1 WIRED" and not "MUX 1 WIRED".  For a minute there I had a strange mix of confusion and excitement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a bunch of photos in TFA .
One is a close-up of the dashboard .
It took me a few looks to realize it said " AUX 1 WIRED " and not " MUX 1 WIRED " .
For a minute there I had a strange mix of confusion and excitement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a bunch of photos in TFA.
One is a close-up of the dashboard.
It took me a few looks to realize it said "AUX 1 WIRED" and not "MUX 1 WIRED".
For a minute there I had a strange mix of confusion and excitement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591931</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>enrevanche</author>
	<datestamp>1246913940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not communist vs. capitalist but totalitarian vs. democracy. With democracy you get at least some degree of necessity to answer to the people.
</p><p>What is so green about starting WW2? Perhaps Hitler was "green" in the old fatherland, but he spread environmental disaster everywhere else.
</p><p>Germany at that time certainly was a collaboration of capitalists with fascists, but the economy was highly controlled and regulated and could in no way be consider a market economy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not communist vs. capitalist but totalitarian vs. democracy. With democracy you get at least some degree of necessity to answer to the people .
What is so green about starting WW2 ?
Perhaps Hitler was " green " in the old fatherland , but he spread environmental disaster everywhere else .
Germany at that time certainly was a collaboration of capitalists with fascists , but the economy was highly controlled and regulated and could in no way be consider a market economy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not communist vs. capitalist but totalitarian vs. democracy. With democracy you get at least some degree of necessity to answer to the people.
What is so green about starting WW2?
Perhaps Hitler was "green" in the old fatherland, but he spread environmental disaster everywhere else.
Germany at that time certainly was a collaboration of capitalists with fascists, but the economy was highly controlled and regulated and could in no way be consider a market economy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591695</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>haifastudent</author>
	<datestamp>1246823700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.</p></div><p>Which was the only thing that the author found to complain about in the whole article. Telling, very telling. From TFA: </p><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can stomach the Windows Mobile interface long enough to set your destination, you get to view your route guidance in a tiny screen in the rearview mirror.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Which was the only thing that the author found to complain about in the whole article .
Telling , very telling .
From TFA : If you can stomach the Windows Mobile interface long enough to set your destination , you get to view your route guidance in a tiny screen in the rearview mirror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Which was the only thing that the author found to complain about in the whole article.
Telling, very telling.
From TFA: If you can stomach the Windows Mobile interface long enough to set your destination, you get to view your route guidance in a tiny screen in the rearview mirror.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592861</id>
	<title>All cars use a lot of energy</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1246884480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one of the reasons why there's so much interest in making them more efficient. Small percentage gains can equal a lot of energy gains. You will find that an average house can be serviced quite nicely by a smallish car engine. That is, in fact, precisely what medium sized backup generators use. They are automobile engines modified to run on propane or natural gas (sometimes they are diesel but usually NG for smaller units since you have a feed to your house). A 4 cylinder, 1.6 liter engine running at 3500rpm will give you 30kw of power and thus power an average house no problem.</p><p>Cars use a ton of energy compared to most other personal uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one of the reasons why there 's so much interest in making them more efficient .
Small percentage gains can equal a lot of energy gains .
You will find that an average house can be serviced quite nicely by a smallish car engine .
That is , in fact , precisely what medium sized backup generators use .
They are automobile engines modified to run on propane or natural gas ( sometimes they are diesel but usually NG for smaller units since you have a feed to your house ) .
A 4 cylinder , 1.6 liter engine running at 3500rpm will give you 30kw of power and thus power an average house no problem.Cars use a ton of energy compared to most other personal uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one of the reasons why there's so much interest in making them more efficient.
Small percentage gains can equal a lot of energy gains.
You will find that an average house can be serviced quite nicely by a smallish car engine.
That is, in fact, precisely what medium sized backup generators use.
They are automobile engines modified to run on propane or natural gas (sometimes they are diesel but usually NG for smaller units since you have a feed to your house).
A 4 cylinder, 1.6 liter engine running at 3500rpm will give you 30kw of power and thus power an average house no problem.Cars use a ton of energy compared to most other personal uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592235</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246875000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much is it in horses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much is it in horses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much is it in horses?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591163</id>
	<title>Comparison</title>
	<author>Amiralul</author>
	<datestamp>1246817580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Still, it's cheaper than TPB...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still , it 's cheaper than TPB.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still, it's cheaper than TPB...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592479</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>InfiniteZero</author>
	<datestamp>1246878840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your story reminds me of a joke.
<br> <br>
Q: What does it take to change a Democrat to a Republican?
<br> <br>
A: 30 years.
<br> <br>
(Not that I'm calling you old.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your story reminds me of a joke .
Q : What does it take to change a Democrat to a Republican ?
A : 30 years .
( Not that I 'm calling you old .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your story reminds me of a joke.
Q: What does it take to change a Democrat to a Republican?
A: 30 years.
(Not that I'm calling you old.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246876320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.</p></div><p>Which probably wouldn't be much of an issue if it worked properly, but if I understand TFA correctly, the billionaires need to buy an outdated PDA to use it, and on a sunny day with the top down, they still can't see where they need to go.</p><p>If I paid $2.1 million for a car, at the very least I'd want to be able to program the nav system from my high-end smart phone, and directions should be projected HUD-style in the front window, with brightness automatically adjusted according to how sunny it is and whether the top is down. That's not too much to ask, is it?</p><p>I guess I'll just wait for Bugatti's next attempt to get it right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Which probably would n't be much of an issue if it worked properly , but if I understand TFA correctly , the billionaires need to buy an outdated PDA to use it , and on a sunny day with the top down , they still ca n't see where they need to go.If I paid $ 2.1 million for a car , at the very least I 'd want to be able to program the nav system from my high-end smart phone , and directions should be projected HUD-style in the front window , with brightness automatically adjusted according to how sunny it is and whether the top is down .
That 's not too much to ask , is it ? I guess I 'll just wait for Bugatti 's next attempt to get it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Which probably wouldn't be much of an issue if it worked properly, but if I understand TFA correctly, the billionaires need to buy an outdated PDA to use it, and on a sunny day with the top down, they still can't see where they need to go.If I paid $2.1 million for a car, at the very least I'd want to be able to program the nav system from my high-end smart phone, and directions should be projected HUD-style in the front window, with brightness automatically adjusted according to how sunny it is and whether the top is down.
That's not too much to ask, is it?I guess I'll just wait for Bugatti's next attempt to get it right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592245</id>
	<title>Re:It is not about the top speed...</title>
	<author>junglee\_iitk</author>
	<datestamp>1246875240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much would you take to give me that Porsche for free?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much would you take to give me that Porsche for free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much would you take to give me that Porsche for free?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592959</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>rant64</author>
	<datestamp>1246885500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any decent navigation system shouldn't require you to look at the screen, instead it should provide unambiguous voice instructions. Both nav-systems I've used (several TomTom models and the Professional system built into BMW cars) do this very well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any decent navigation system should n't require you to look at the screen , instead it should provide unambiguous voice instructions .
Both nav-systems I 've used ( several TomTom models and the Professional system built into BMW cars ) do this very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any decent navigation system shouldn't require you to look at the screen, instead it should provide unambiguous voice instructions.
Both nav-systems I've used (several TomTom models and the Professional system built into BMW cars) do this very well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591343</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246819380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh fuck you.  There are plenty of self-conscious assholes who think of no one but themselves and park like that too, and those dick wads deserve getting their car keyed.  What's the matter, are you one of those dicks who got his car keyed for that very reason?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh fuck you .
There are plenty of self-conscious assholes who think of no one but themselves and park like that too , and those dick wads deserve getting their car keyed .
What 's the matter , are you one of those dicks who got his car keyed for that very reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh fuck you.
There are plenty of self-conscious assholes who think of no one but themselves and park like that too, and those dick wads deserve getting their car keyed.
What's the matter, are you one of those dicks who got his car keyed for that very reason?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591025</id>
	<title>It's degrees</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246816440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The car isn't for millionaires it's essentially for billionaires or people with that level of yearly income. Lets say you are making 50 or 100 million a year just how much can you spend on food and housing? the sad thing is it's like the "Dawn of the Dead" quote about a gun. "The only one that could miss with this is the sucker with the bread to buy it". The point being just how many people with that much money can actually handle a car of that caliber? They are effectively a piece of art that will largely go to waste.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The car is n't for millionaires it 's essentially for billionaires or people with that level of yearly income .
Lets say you are making 50 or 100 million a year just how much can you spend on food and housing ?
the sad thing is it 's like the " Dawn of the Dead " quote about a gun .
" The only one that could miss with this is the sucker with the bread to buy it " .
The point being just how many people with that much money can actually handle a car of that caliber ?
They are effectively a piece of art that will largely go to waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The car isn't for millionaires it's essentially for billionaires or people with that level of yearly income.
Lets say you are making 50 or 100 million a year just how much can you spend on food and housing?
the sad thing is it's like the "Dawn of the Dead" quote about a gun.
"The only one that could miss with this is the sucker with the bread to buy it".
The point being just how many people with that much money can actually handle a car of that caliber?
They are effectively a piece of art that will largely go to waste.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592401</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>SlashWombat</author>
	<datestamp>1246877700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If I ever see someone drive one of those I'd fucking key it. You have the money for that, you deserve to have it keyed at the very least.</p> </div><p>Smart move<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... someone with that much money would also have no trouble finding the few grand it would take to have you permanently removed from the planet. (IMHO, pity it would cost him that much!)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I ever see someone drive one of those I 'd fucking key it .
You have the money for that , you deserve to have it keyed at the very least .
Smart move ... someone with that much money would also have no trouble finding the few grand it would take to have you permanently removed from the planet .
( IMHO , pity it would cost him that much !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I ever see someone drive one of those I'd fucking key it.
You have the money for that, you deserve to have it keyed at the very least.
Smart move ... someone with that much money would also have no trouble finding the few grand it would take to have you permanently removed from the planet.
(IMHO, pity it would cost him that much!
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593737</id>
	<title>Re:My question</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246891020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christ, Slashdot has really gone downhill when people don't recognise Simpsons quotes anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christ , Slashdot has really gone downhill when people do n't recognise Simpsons quotes anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christ, Slashdot has really gone downhill when people don't recognise Simpsons quotes anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594785</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Kentari</author>
	<datestamp>1246896900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti\_Veyron" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia article</a> [wikipedia.org] you can get that the coupe Veyron does (and the convertible won't be far off):</p><p>0-100 km/h in 2.46s<br>
100-200 km/h in 4.8s<br>
200-300 km/h in 9.4s
300-400 km/h in 33s</p><p>I wouldn't say it drops off quickly after reaching 100. It does the 200-300km/h jump faster than my new car will do 0-100km/h... Keep in mind that the difference in kinetic energy between 300km/h and 200km/h is 5 times larger than between 100km/h and 0. It's performance is stunning and saying it becomes "slow" after 100 is like saying orbiting around the Earth in a Space Shuttle is dull after the launch. If you want to prove me wrong I'd accept a ride with a Veyron...</p><p>Oh, and that main straight on the VW Ehra-Lessien test track really is only 8.9km (or 5.5 miles for the metric disabled). You can measure this yourself with Google Earth or <a href="http://maps.google.be/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=Ehra-Lessien&amp;sll=51.2487,4.424186&amp;sspn=0.011121,0.026157&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=52.632646,10.781021&amp;spn=0.172531,0.41851&amp;t=h&amp;z=12" title="google.be" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> [google.be].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Wikipedia article [ wikipedia.org ] you can get that the coupe Veyron does ( and the convertible wo n't be far off ) : 0-100 km/h in 2.46s 100-200 km/h in 4.8s 200-300 km/h in 9.4s 300-400 km/h in 33sI would n't say it drops off quickly after reaching 100 .
It does the 200-300km/h jump faster than my new car will do 0-100km/h... Keep in mind that the difference in kinetic energy between 300km/h and 200km/h is 5 times larger than between 100km/h and 0 .
It 's performance is stunning and saying it becomes " slow " after 100 is like saying orbiting around the Earth in a Space Shuttle is dull after the launch .
If you want to prove me wrong I 'd accept a ride with a Veyron...Oh , and that main straight on the VW Ehra-Lessien test track really is only 8.9km ( or 5.5 miles for the metric disabled ) .
You can measure this yourself with Google Earth or Google Maps [ google.be ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org] you can get that the coupe Veyron does (and the convertible won't be far off):0-100 km/h in 2.46s
100-200 km/h in 4.8s
200-300 km/h in 9.4s
300-400 km/h in 33sI wouldn't say it drops off quickly after reaching 100.
It does the 200-300km/h jump faster than my new car will do 0-100km/h... Keep in mind that the difference in kinetic energy between 300km/h and 200km/h is 5 times larger than between 100km/h and 0.
It's performance is stunning and saying it becomes "slow" after 100 is like saying orbiting around the Earth in a Space Shuttle is dull after the launch.
If you want to prove me wrong I'd accept a ride with a Veyron...Oh, and that main straight on the VW Ehra-Lessien test track really is only 8.9km (or 5.5 miles for the metric disabled).
You can measure this yourself with Google Earth or Google Maps [google.be].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591721</id>
	<title>Re:story trashcan ?</title>
	<author>Jbcarpen</author>
	<datestamp>1246823940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're referring to the Veyron that <i>isn't</i> a convertible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're referring to the Veyron that is n't a convertible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're referring to the Veyron that isn't a convertible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Angstroem</author>
	<datestamp>1246875360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <em>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds. You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly. About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.</em></p></div> </blockquote><p>That's not even remotely true. You know, in Germany we *do* have cars on the road that do 260 to 320kph (abt. 160 to 200mph), although usually they get (electronically) limited to 250kph (155mph), and if you want to get an impression how an average car performs on a German autobahn at up to 320kph, have a look at this one:</p><p> <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1063940552930517285&amp;ei=9L9RSqn2NZOY2AKKp6GTCA&amp;q=audi+lpg+vmax" title="google.com">
</a> [google.com]<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1063940552930517285&amp;ei=9L9RSqn2NZOY2AKKp6GTCA&amp;q=audi+lpg+vmax" title="google.com">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1063940552930517285&amp;ei=9L9RSqn2NZOY2AKKp6GTCA&amp;q=audi+lpg+vmax</a> [google.com]  </p><p>Sure, there's 45mph missing. But then, this is a (chiptuned) stock car, an unhappy 4.2l Audi A8 which fell into the wrong hands, which does *not* offer 1001hp.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it , or any 200 + MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds .
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds , but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly .
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed * is * a test track with an enormous straight .
That 's not even remotely true .
You know , in Germany we * do * have cars on the road that do 260 to 320kph ( abt .
160 to 200mph ) , although usually they get ( electronically ) limited to 250kph ( 155mph ) , and if you want to get an impression how an average car performs on a German autobahn at up to 320kph , have a look at this one : [ google.com ] http : //video.google.com/videoplay ? docid = -1063940552930517285&amp;ei = 9L9RSqn2NZOY2AKKp6GTCA&amp;q = audi + lpg + vmax [ google.com ] Sure , there 's 45mph missing .
But then , this is a ( chiptuned ) stock car , an unhappy 4.2l Audi A8 which fell into the wrong hands , which does * not * offer 1001hp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds.
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly.
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.
That's not even remotely true.
You know, in Germany we *do* have cars on the road that do 260 to 320kph (abt.
160 to 200mph), although usually they get (electronically) limited to 250kph (155mph), and if you want to get an impression how an average car performs on a German autobahn at up to 320kph, have a look at this one: 
 [google.com]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1063940552930517285&amp;ei=9L9RSqn2NZOY2AKKp6GTCA&amp;q=audi+lpg+vmax [google.com]  Sure, there's 45mph missing.
But then, this is a (chiptuned) stock car, an unhappy 4.2l Audi A8 which fell into the wrong hands, which does *not* offer 1001hp.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601457</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>david.given</author>
	<datestamp>1246883700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fair enough --- I had a lot of trouble finding figures for the 'average' wind turbine. Mostly they just quote them in the mythical 'power X homes' terms.

<p>The business park where I work has a single turbine as a landscape feature, an Enercon E-70. Now I look, I see someone's updated the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GreenPark\_Business\_Park" title="wikipedia.org">wikipedia page</a> [wikipedia.org] with a power output figure --- 2MW.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fair enough --- I had a lot of trouble finding figures for the 'average ' wind turbine .
Mostly they just quote them in the mythical 'power X homes ' terms .
The business park where I work has a single turbine as a landscape feature , an Enercon E-70 .
Now I look , I see someone 's updated the wikipedia page [ wikipedia.org ] with a power output figure --- 2MW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fair enough --- I had a lot of trouble finding figures for the 'average' wind turbine.
Mostly they just quote them in the mythical 'power X homes' terms.
The business park where I work has a single turbine as a landscape feature, an Enercon E-70.
Now I look, I see someone's updated the wikipedia page [wikipedia.org] with a power output figure --- 2MW.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592161</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1246873800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>hmm, you must be a have-not.   I'm sure you can afford to own a notebook, right?  In that case, by your childish have-not logic, you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler, then have your notebook stolen.<br> <br>

You deserve it at the very least.<br> <br>

Why is it that people with the wherewithal who simply live their lives are branded as cunts who deserve to be robbed, killed, sneered at and have there decent piece of engineering keyed by pimply-faced have-nots?<br> <br>

I suggest to you, Anonymous Coward, that you are indeed an anonymous coward ashamed of your own simmering mediocrity.  You are, furthermore, a fucking communist who bites the very hand that feeds it.  Go join Osama bin fucking Laden and his bearded closet gays who enjoy destroying instead of building.  You don't deserve to be part of a civilised society which aspires to build, improve, learn, live a productive and long life raising beautiful children and leave a legacy.<br> <br>

I'd like to thank you for reminding me that the world is full of little shits like you who do not deserve to be gainfully employed (I filter out your kind all the time when employing - your thin veneer of civility does not hide the pus in your soul).  I enjoy superior engineering, the same way you enjoy your decently engineered notebook.  Linus drives an old German merc (remember, these things are all relative) who, by your reasoning, has the money for it, and therefore deserves to have his beautiful piece of human engineering keyed, because hey, <i>you</i> can't afford one.<br> <br>

And please, don't blather about how you cannot compare an old merc to a Bugatti.  If you do, then I'm sure you won't even hear the <i>whoosh</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>hmm , you must be a have-not .
I 'm sure you can afford to own a notebook , right ?
In that case , by your childish have-not logic , you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler , then have your notebook stolen .
You deserve it at the very least .
Why is it that people with the wherewithal who simply live their lives are branded as cunts who deserve to be robbed , killed , sneered at and have there decent piece of engineering keyed by pimply-faced have-nots ?
I suggest to you , Anonymous Coward , that you are indeed an anonymous coward ashamed of your own simmering mediocrity .
You are , furthermore , a fucking communist who bites the very hand that feeds it .
Go join Osama bin fucking Laden and his bearded closet gays who enjoy destroying instead of building .
You do n't deserve to be part of a civilised society which aspires to build , improve , learn , live a productive and long life raising beautiful children and leave a legacy .
I 'd like to thank you for reminding me that the world is full of little shits like you who do not deserve to be gainfully employed ( I filter out your kind all the time when employing - your thin veneer of civility does not hide the pus in your soul ) .
I enjoy superior engineering , the same way you enjoy your decently engineered notebook .
Linus drives an old German merc ( remember , these things are all relative ) who , by your reasoning , has the money for it , and therefore deserves to have his beautiful piece of human engineering keyed , because hey , you ca n't afford one .
And please , do n't blather about how you can not compare an old merc to a Bugatti .
If you do , then I 'm sure you wo n't even hear the whoosh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hmm, you must be a have-not.
I'm sure you can afford to own a notebook, right?
In that case, by your childish have-not logic, you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler, then have your notebook stolen.
You deserve it at the very least.
Why is it that people with the wherewithal who simply live their lives are branded as cunts who deserve to be robbed, killed, sneered at and have there decent piece of engineering keyed by pimply-faced have-nots?
I suggest to you, Anonymous Coward, that you are indeed an anonymous coward ashamed of your own simmering mediocrity.
You are, furthermore, a fucking communist who bites the very hand that feeds it.
Go join Osama bin fucking Laden and his bearded closet gays who enjoy destroying instead of building.
You don't deserve to be part of a civilised society which aspires to build, improve, learn, live a productive and long life raising beautiful children and leave a legacy.
I'd like to thank you for reminding me that the world is full of little shits like you who do not deserve to be gainfully employed (I filter out your kind all the time when employing - your thin veneer of civility does not hide the pus in your soul).
I enjoy superior engineering, the same way you enjoy your decently engineered notebook.
Linus drives an old German merc (remember, these things are all relative) who, by your reasoning, has the money for it, and therefore deserves to have his beautiful piece of human engineering keyed, because hey, you can't afford one.
And please, don't blather about how you cannot compare an old merc to a Bugatti.
If you do, then I'm sure you won't even hear the whoosh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>nidarus</author>
	<datestamp>1246816500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.  Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?!</p></div><p>"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes. It kinda figures, considering that they were all about "progress", technology and industrial "victory". The Nazis, OTOH, were relatively "green", at least in theory. Hitler was even a vegetarian (sort of). Cue Godwin!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , like they gon na sell millions of these .
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself , eh , monkey boy ? !
" Commie " is a bit inappropriate , considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes .
It kinda figures , considering that they were all about " progress " , technology and industrial " victory " .
The Nazis , OTOH , were relatively " green " , at least in theory .
Hitler was even a vegetarian ( sort of ) .
Cue Godwin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?!
"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes.
It kinda figures, considering that they were all about "progress", technology and industrial "victory".
The Nazis, OTOH, were relatively "green", at least in theory.
Hitler was even a vegetarian (sort of).
Cue Godwin!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591139</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246817340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So...why does this guy get troll, while the parent gets insightful? Because he used big nasty swear words?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So...why does this guy get troll , while the parent gets insightful ?
Because he used big nasty swear words ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So...why does this guy get troll, while the parent gets insightful?
Because he used big nasty swear words?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591679</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You seem to think that Bugatti is a recent car manufacturer. It was actually created in 1909 and has always been in the luxury market<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to think that Bugatti is a recent car manufacturer .
It was actually created in 1909 and has always been in the luxury market .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to think that Bugatti is a recent car manufacturer.
It was actually created in 1909 and has always been in the luxury market ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601719</id>
	<title>Re:The fastest production car...</title>
	<author>Oblong\_Cheese</author>
	<datestamp>1246885020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has the highest top speed, granted.
<br>
<br>
But it is not the most impressive. Compare the interior of the Ultimate Aero and the Veyron: there is no comparison. The Aero is a race chassis with a huge engine and little in the way of comfort. The Veyron has an option of magnesium indicator stalks to look awesome, and to save weight!
<br>
<br>
Also, if you watch the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk1t6S737Cs" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">episode</a> [youtube.com] of Top Gear UK where James May tests the Veyron to its top speed, they make mention after the film that the car is "totally undramatic" at such ridiculous speeds, and compare this to the fact that in all other hypercars which are capable of similar speeds, you feel as though the car is at its limits, whereas in the Veyron it is comfortable and quiet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has the highest top speed , granted .
But it is not the most impressive .
Compare the interior of the Ultimate Aero and the Veyron : there is no comparison .
The Aero is a race chassis with a huge engine and little in the way of comfort .
The Veyron has an option of magnesium indicator stalks to look awesome , and to save weight !
Also , if you watch the episode [ youtube.com ] of Top Gear UK where James May tests the Veyron to its top speed , they make mention after the film that the car is " totally undramatic " at such ridiculous speeds , and compare this to the fact that in all other hypercars which are capable of similar speeds , you feel as though the car is at its limits , whereas in the Veyron it is comfortable and quiet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has the highest top speed, granted.
But it is not the most impressive.
Compare the interior of the Ultimate Aero and the Veyron: there is no comparison.
The Aero is a race chassis with a huge engine and little in the way of comfort.
The Veyron has an option of magnesium indicator stalks to look awesome, and to save weight!
Also, if you watch the episode [youtube.com] of Top Gear UK where James May tests the Veyron to its top speed, they make mention after the film that the car is "totally undramatic" at such ridiculous speeds, and compare this to the fact that in all other hypercars which are capable of similar speeds, you feel as though the car is at its limits, whereas in the Veyron it is comfortable and quiet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</id>
	<title>If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246814880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I ever see someone drive one of those I'd fucking key it. You have the money for that, you deserve to have it keyed at the very least.
<br>
<br>
Posting anonymously so I won't be blamed when someone actually does it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I ever see someone drive one of those I 'd fucking key it .
You have the money for that , you deserve to have it keyed at the very least .
Posting anonymously so I wo n't be blamed when someone actually does it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I ever see someone drive one of those I'd fucking key it.
You have the money for that, you deserve to have it keyed at the very least.
Posting anonymously so I won't be blamed when someone actually does it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592101</id>
	<title>Re:Hell yeah!</title>
	<author>wisty</author>
	<datestamp>1246872780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that most passenger gets these days have an in-flight entertainment system, which runs off a data center, I'd say that's a bit optimistic.</p><p>Not to mention military jets, bullet trains, and exotic things like spacecraft and the ISS.</p><p>Oh wait, it's modded "funny". I guess it must be a joke then. My bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that most passenger gets these days have an in-flight entertainment system , which runs off a data center , I 'd say that 's a bit optimistic.Not to mention military jets , bullet trains , and exotic things like spacecraft and the ISS.Oh wait , it 's modded " funny " .
I guess it must be a joke then .
My bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that most passenger gets these days have an in-flight entertainment system, which runs off a data center, I'd say that's a bit optimistic.Not to mention military jets, bullet trains, and exotic things like spacecraft and the ISS.Oh wait, it's modded "funny".
I guess it must be a joke then.
My bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596477</id>
	<title>I assume Jay Leno has one on order.</title>
	<author>scharkalvin</author>
	<datestamp>1246904160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He has a few other other useless cars an motorcycles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He has a few other other useless cars an motorcycles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He has a few other other useless cars an motorcycles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592765</id>
	<title>Guilty conscience?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246883520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guilty over what?  I find that guilt is a useless emotion unless one has actually wronged someone else.  Enjoying the fruits of your labor rewards self and rewards others who's job it was to design, build, and sell that car.  Guilty about the fuel consumption?  Nope.  That ONE car will never use as much fuel in it's lifetime as a single 767 flight across the Atlantic.  Guilty about Global Warming?  Nope.  Man-made Global Warming is being discredited at a growing rate, hence Congress' mad rush to cram through the Waxman-Markey bill before all of Al Gore's investments are stranded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guilty over what ?
I find that guilt is a useless emotion unless one has actually wronged someone else .
Enjoying the fruits of your labor rewards self and rewards others who 's job it was to design , build , and sell that car .
Guilty about the fuel consumption ?
Nope. That ONE car will never use as much fuel in it 's lifetime as a single 767 flight across the Atlantic .
Guilty about Global Warming ?
Nope. Man-made Global Warming is being discredited at a growing rate , hence Congress ' mad rush to cram through the Waxman-Markey bill before all of Al Gore 's investments are stranded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guilty over what?
I find that guilt is a useless emotion unless one has actually wronged someone else.
Enjoying the fruits of your labor rewards self and rewards others who's job it was to design, build, and sell that car.
Guilty about the fuel consumption?
Nope.  That ONE car will never use as much fuel in it's lifetime as a single 767 flight across the Atlantic.
Guilty about Global Warming?
Nope.  Man-made Global Warming is being discredited at a growing rate, hence Congress' mad rush to cram through the Waxman-Markey bill before all of Al Gore's investments are stranded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591215</id>
	<title>Think of the Virgens!</title>
	<author>unlametheweak</author>
	<datestamp>1246818000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why? The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering. Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall. The workmanship is astounding.</p></div><p>Not only that, but according to the Wired article, </p><p><div class="quote"><p>they had to sacrifice 100 virgins and have the production facility in Molsheim, France, blessed by druids.</p></div><p>I completely disagree with sacrificing virgins, so anybody who buys this car is implicitly supporting the destruction of virgins.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering .
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall .
The workmanship is astounding.Not only that , but according to the Wired article , they had to sacrifice 100 virgins and have the production facility in Molsheim , France , blessed by druids.I completely disagree with sacrificing virgins , so anybody who buys this car is implicitly supporting the destruction of virgins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering.
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall.
The workmanship is astounding.Not only that, but according to the Wired article, they had to sacrifice 100 virgins and have the production facility in Molsheim, France, blessed by druids.I completely disagree with sacrificing virgins, so anybody who buys this car is implicitly supporting the destruction of virgins.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595087</id>
	<title>Re:Guilty conscience?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246898280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I could afford that car, I'd feel awesome.  And two chicks at the same time.  And more than feel them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I could afford that car , I 'd feel awesome .
And two chicks at the same time .
And more than feel them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I could afford that car, I'd feel awesome.
And two chicks at the same time.
And more than feel them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592111</id>
	<title>Well the owning company says it all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246872900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or should that more correctly read It's a BOLLOCKS WAGON (oh sorry for the wets out there it's a volkswagon ) still a load of bollocks mind when they shed the bollocks wagon grip they may just become a worth a look company other wise even if i was the richest person in the world it'd a BOLLOCKS WAGON it is a load of BOLLOCKS much like BMW there is another load of BOLLOCKS .</p><p>You can always tell the standard of the drug dealer by the perticular german vehicle he drives Golf lowest of the low  Golf GTI (got twat inside) next one up the ladder.<br>BMW 3 series a bit futher up  JERCADES (mercedes) heading up the top .<br>German engineering so grosley over rated it is un true</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or should that more correctly read It 's a BOLLOCKS WAGON ( oh sorry for the wets out there it 's a volkswagon ) still a load of bollocks mind when they shed the bollocks wagon grip they may just become a worth a look company other wise even if i was the richest person in the world it 'd a BOLLOCKS WAGON it is a load of BOLLOCKS much like BMW there is another load of BOLLOCKS .You can always tell the standard of the drug dealer by the perticular german vehicle he drives Golf lowest of the low Golf GTI ( got twat inside ) next one up the ladder.BMW 3 series a bit futher up JERCADES ( mercedes ) heading up the top .German engineering so grosley over rated it is un true</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or should that more correctly read It's a BOLLOCKS WAGON (oh sorry for the wets out there it's a volkswagon ) still a load of bollocks mind when they shed the bollocks wagon grip they may just become a worth a look company other wise even if i was the richest person in the world it'd a BOLLOCKS WAGON it is a load of BOLLOCKS much like BMW there is another load of BOLLOCKS .You can always tell the standard of the drug dealer by the perticular german vehicle he drives Golf lowest of the low  Golf GTI (got twat inside) next one up the ladder.BMW 3 series a bit futher up  JERCADES (mercedes) heading up the top .German engineering so grosley over rated it is un true</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592615</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/09/gizmondo-chief-finally-arrested-for-being-too-shady/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/09/gizmondo-chief-finally-arrested-for-being-too-shady/</a> [engadget.com]
<br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ferrari-enzo/" title="gizmodo.com" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/tag/ferrari-enzo/</a> [gizmodo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.engadget.com/2006/04/09/gizmondo-chief-finally-arrested-for-being-too-shady/ [ engadget.com ] http : //gizmodo.com/tag/ferrari-enzo/ [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/09/gizmondo-chief-finally-arrested-for-being-too-shady/ [engadget.com]

http://gizmodo.com/tag/ferrari-enzo/ [gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593845</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>SparkleMotion88</author>
	<datestamp>1246891740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers. Wired used to be something to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/read/.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I agree.  I canceled my subscription a couple of years ago after I noticed that every cover story was an advertisement for some movie that was coming to theaters that month.  The rest of the issue was also generally uninteresting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers .
Wired used to be something to /read/ .
I agree .
I canceled my subscription a couple of years ago after I noticed that every cover story was an advertisement for some movie that was coming to theaters that month .
The rest of the issue was also generally uninteresting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.
Wired used to be something to /read/.
I agree.
I canceled my subscription a couple of years ago after I noticed that every cover story was an advertisement for some movie that was coming to theaters that month.
The rest of the issue was also generally uninteresting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593831</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Admiral Ag</author>
	<datestamp>1246891620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs."</p><p>What if it was owned by Chad Kroger?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I ever caught you keying ANY car , I 'd break your fucking legs .
" What if it was owned by Chad Kroger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs.
"What if it was owned by Chad Kroger?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592033</id>
	<title>Newest addition?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246872000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That thing is OLD! It is in production since 2005! Or am I just getting a "you must be new here" for stating the obvious?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That thing is OLD !
It is in production since 2005 !
Or am I just getting a " you must be new here " for stating the obvious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That thing is OLD!
It is in production since 2005!
Or am I just getting a "you must be new here" for stating the obvious?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591911</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246913640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/quotes#qt0447191" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Obligatory Pulp Fiction quote</a> [imdb.com]</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory Pulp Fiction quote [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory Pulp Fiction quote [imdb.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593243</id>
	<title>ssc aero anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246887840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The funny thing is that the Veyron hasn't even been the fastest street legal car for years now, it's just the one that everyone keeps hearing about. I believe the fastest is from an American company: Shelby Motors. it's called the SSC Aero.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSC\_Aero</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The funny thing is that the Veyron has n't even been the fastest street legal car for years now , it 's just the one that everyone keeps hearing about .
I believe the fastest is from an American company : Shelby Motors .
it 's called the SSC Aero.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSC \ _Aero</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funny thing is that the Veyron hasn't even been the fastest street legal car for years now, it's just the one that everyone keeps hearing about.
I believe the fastest is from an American company: Shelby Motors.
it's called the SSC Aero.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSC\_Aero</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601429</id>
	<title>Koenigsegg CCX doesn't fall far behind</title>
	<author>OutputLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1246883460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.topspeed.com/cars/koenigsegg-ccx/ke567.html" title="topspeed.com" rel="nofollow">Koenigsegg CCX</a> [topspeed.com] doesn't fall far behind Bugatti Veyron:
<br>  - price: $2,100,000
<br>  - 1018 hp
<br>  - top speed of 257 mph

<br> <br>And on top of it: it's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090616-711007.html" title="wsj.com" rel="nofollow">buying Saab</a> [wsj.com]. Koenigsegg has only 45 full time staff empolyees and sold 18 cars last year,which is 97,982 less than SAAB did.
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://outputlogic.com/" title="outputlogic.com" rel="nofollow">OutputLogic</a> [outputlogic.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Koenigsegg CCX [ topspeed.com ] does n't fall far behind Bugatti Veyron : - price : $ 2,100,000 - 1018 hp - top speed of 257 mph And on top of it : it 's buying Saab [ wsj.com ] .
Koenigsegg has only 45 full time staff empolyees and sold 18 cars last year,which is 97,982 less than SAAB did .
OutputLogic [ outputlogic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Koenigsegg CCX [topspeed.com] doesn't fall far behind Bugatti Veyron:
  - price: $2,100,000
  - 1018 hp
  - top speed of 257 mph

 And on top of it: it's buying Saab [wsj.com].
Koenigsegg has only 45 full time staff empolyees and sold 18 cars last year,which is 97,982 less than SAAB did.
OutputLogic [outputlogic.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592531</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>mnky-33</author>
	<datestamp>1246879740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.  Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?!</p></div><p>"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes. It kinda figures, considering that they were all about "progress", technology and industrial "victory". The Nazis, OTOH, were relatively "green", at least in theory. Hitler was even a vegetarian (sort of). Cue Godwin!</p></div><p>I'm fed up of this "Hitler was a veggie" myth. It isn't true. His doctors attempted to make him switch to an all veg diet to cure his flatulence, but he never did.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , like they gon na sell millions of these .
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself , eh , monkey boy ? !
" Commie " is a bit inappropriate , considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes .
It kinda figures , considering that they were all about " progress " , technology and industrial " victory " .
The Nazis , OTOH , were relatively " green " , at least in theory .
Hitler was even a vegetarian ( sort of ) .
Cue Godwin ! I 'm fed up of this " Hitler was a veggie " myth .
It is n't true .
His doctors attempted to make him switch to an all veg diet to cure his flatulence , but he never did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?!
"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes.
It kinda figures, considering that they were all about "progress", technology and industrial "victory".
The Nazis, OTOH, were relatively "green", at least in theory.
Hitler was even a vegetarian (sort of).
Cue Godwin!I'm fed up of this "Hitler was a veggie" myth.
It isn't true.
His doctors attempted to make him switch to an all veg diet to cure his flatulence, but he never did.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590985</id>
	<title>It's ridiculous to those</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246815960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>who can't afford it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>who ca n't afford it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who can't afford it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591783</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1246911540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1000 horsepower is a lot of power.</p></div><p>Enough to put the average driver into a ditch on the roadside unless the engine is governed and the dynamic stability and traction control system is engaged. Before these sorts of systems were available, putting this much horsepower into the hands of a inexperienced or non-race trained driver was often a deadly combination.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1000 horsepower is a lot of power.Enough to put the average driver into a ditch on the roadside unless the engine is governed and the dynamic stability and traction control system is engaged .
Before these sorts of systems were available , putting this much horsepower into the hands of a inexperienced or non-race trained driver was often a deadly combination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1000 horsepower is a lot of power.Enough to put the average driver into a ditch on the roadside unless the engine is governed and the dynamic stability and traction control system is engaged.
Before these sorts of systems were available, putting this much horsepower into the hands of a inexperienced or non-race trained driver was often a deadly combination.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592259</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>auric\_dude</author>
	<datestamp>1246875420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same might be said for their <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/</a> [wired.com] - has Wired now become Wireless?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same might be said for their http : //www.wired.com/dangerroom/ [ wired.com ] - has Wired now become Wireless ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same might be said for their http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/ [wired.com] - has Wired now become Wireless?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871</id>
	<title>Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246814940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Top Gear had an episode some time ago where they opened this beast up on the 5 mile+ straight at Volkswagen's German test facility.  So damned fast - 407 kph!</p><p>From the episode: "At this speed, the tires will disintegrate in 15 minutes - That's ok, we've only got enough fuel for 12"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Top Gear had an episode some time ago where they opened this beast up on the 5 mile + straight at Volkswagen 's German test facility .
So damned fast - 407 kph ! From the episode : " At this speed , the tires will disintegrate in 15 minutes - That 's ok , we 've only got enough fuel for 12 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Top Gear had an episode some time ago where they opened this beast up on the 5 mile+ straight at Volkswagen's German test facility.
So damned fast - 407 kph!From the episode: "At this speed, the tires will disintegrate in 15 minutes - That's ok, we've only got enough fuel for 12"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591543</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Real geeks put diamond dust on the wipers =D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Real geeks put diamond dust on the wipers = D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real geeks put diamond dust on the wipers =D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592813</id>
	<title>Why spend $2m when you can spend .80?</title>
	<author>Niubi</author>
	<datestamp>1246883940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lol, 2 million bucks for a car? That's just dumb when you can get a brand new Harley Davidson for 80 cents. Plus the Harley's way cooler. Don't believe me? Check it out. Only 11 days to go...
<a href="http://us.dubli.com/Harley-Davidson-2009-FLHX-Street-Glide\_\_3\_1337" title="dubli.com" rel="nofollow">http://us.dubli.com/Harley-Davidson-2009-FLHX-Street-Glide\_\_3\_1337</a> [dubli.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol , 2 million bucks for a car ?
That 's just dumb when you can get a brand new Harley Davidson for 80 cents .
Plus the Harley 's way cooler .
Do n't believe me ?
Check it out .
Only 11 days to go.. . http : //us.dubli.com/Harley-Davidson-2009-FLHX-Street-Glide \ _ \ _3 \ _1337 [ dubli.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol, 2 million bucks for a car?
That's just dumb when you can get a brand new Harley Davidson for 80 cents.
Plus the Harley's way cooler.
Don't believe me?
Check it out.
Only 11 days to go...
http://us.dubli.com/Harley-Davidson-2009-FLHX-Street-Glide\_\_3\_1337 [dubli.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594617</id>
	<title>Re:It may be ridiculous....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246896060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow. expensive BJ. Weddings are cheaper... hell, so is dating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow .
expensive BJ .
Weddings are cheaper... hell , so is dating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow.
expensive BJ.
Weddings are cheaper... hell, so is dating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591265</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>pregister</author>
	<datestamp>1246818600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting anonymously so people won't know what a douche you are.</p><p>There, fixed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting anonymously so people wo n't know what a douche you are.There , fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting anonymously so people won't know what a douche you are.There, fixed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593273</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1246887960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like the Warthog?</p><p>*ouch, ouch* why do I post these things!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like the Warthog ?
* ouch , ouch * why do I post these things !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like the Warthog?
*ouch, ouch* why do I post these things!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595397</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>mk2mark</author>
	<datestamp>1246899840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But can it run Vista?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But can it run Vista ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But can it run Vista?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596469</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246904160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts. Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts. A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.</p><p>1000 horsepower is a <i>lot</i> of power.</p></div><p>Cool. So I can buy this and then put up a turbine on my country estate and not only be carbon neutral, I'll actually be carbon negative!</p><p>Hmm. Maybe I should buy two...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts .
Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts .
A single wind turbine , the really big kind they use in wind farms , generates about 1500 kilowatts.1000 horsepower is a lot of power.Cool .
So I can buy this and then put up a turbine on my country estate and not only be carbon neutral , I 'll actually be carbon negative ! Hmm .
Maybe I should buy two.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts.
Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts.
A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.1000 horsepower is a lot of power.Cool.
So I can buy this and then put up a turbine on my country estate and not only be carbon neutral, I'll actually be carbon negative!Hmm.
Maybe I should buy two...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594615</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1246896000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is only one reason to key a car. It's to teach those "I need to take up multiple parking spaces so no one scratches my car fuckers." a lesson. Every time I see a nice car parked taking up multiple spaces in a crowded parking lot....S C R A A A A A T T T C C C H H H H H  ! ! ! ! !</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is only one reason to key a car .
It 's to teach those " I need to take up multiple parking spaces so no one scratches my car fuckers .
" a lesson .
Every time I see a nice car parked taking up multiple spaces in a crowded parking lot....S C R A A A A A T T T C C C H H H H H !
! !
! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is only one reason to key a car.
It's to teach those "I need to take up multiple parking spaces so no one scratches my car fuckers.
" a lesson.
Every time I see a nice car parked taking up multiple spaces in a crowded parking lot....S C R A A A A A T T T C C C H H H H H  !
! !
! !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081</id>
	<title>Bugatti Veyron = 27 MP3's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246816920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kinda puts it in perspective..............</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda puts it in perspective............. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda puts it in perspective..............</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591791</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1246911780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes"</p><p>Not all communist regimes are equal, Cuba certainly has a better environmental record then most capitalist nations, since western nations usually export their garbage to the third world when possible.  So keep the FUD to yourself please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Commie " is a bit inappropriate , considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes " Not all communist regimes are equal , Cuba certainly has a better environmental record then most capitalist nations , since western nations usually export their garbage to the third world when possible .
So keep the FUD to yourself please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Commie" is a bit inappropriate, considering the immense environmental damage caused by communist regimes"Not all communist regimes are equal, Cuba certainly has a better environmental record then most capitalist nations, since western nations usually export their garbage to the third world when possible.
So keep the FUD to yourself please.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28603523</id>
	<title>Missing important accessory</title>
	<author>Cuban Devil</author>
	<datestamp>1246897560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, car is nice, but it still misses the flux capacitor. De Lorean had it decades ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , car is nice , but it still misses the flux capacitor .
De Lorean had it decades ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, car is nice, but it still misses the flux capacitor.
De Lorean had it decades ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594695</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1246896480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>J.K.Rowling could probably afford one.  Does that change yor mind?</htmltext>
<tokenext>J.K.Rowling could probably afford one .
Does that change yor mind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>J.K.Rowling could probably afford one.
Does that change yor mind?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593133</id>
	<title>Re:My question</title>
	<author>ruiner13</author>
	<datestamp>1246887000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The advantage of being able to turn when you want to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The advantage of being able to turn when you want to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The advantage of being able to turn when you want to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599117</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1246872420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having been up to 185 on the autobahn I have to say it is a VERY scary experience that I will always wish I could repeat. I was driving one of the first supercars (Ferrari F40) and while it was capable of 201mph I ran out of straight road before I got to top speed. The smallest breeze at those speeds will push you half way across the lane despite the low profile and it takes a while (distance wise) to get back in the center! Where I think would be much less scary to hit those speeds would be I15 way out in the desert, majorly long straightaways and most of the time not a lot of wind or animals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having been up to 185 on the autobahn I have to say it is a VERY scary experience that I will always wish I could repeat .
I was driving one of the first supercars ( Ferrari F40 ) and while it was capable of 201mph I ran out of straight road before I got to top speed .
The smallest breeze at those speeds will push you half way across the lane despite the low profile and it takes a while ( distance wise ) to get back in the center !
Where I think would be much less scary to hit those speeds would be I15 way out in the desert , majorly long straightaways and most of the time not a lot of wind or animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having been up to 185 on the autobahn I have to say it is a VERY scary experience that I will always wish I could repeat.
I was driving one of the first supercars (Ferrari F40) and while it was capable of 201mph I ran out of straight road before I got to top speed.
The smallest breeze at those speeds will push you half way across the lane despite the low profile and it takes a while (distance wise) to get back in the center!
Where I think would be much less scary to hit those speeds would be I15 way out in the desert, majorly long straightaways and most of the time not a lot of wind or animals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591299</id>
	<title>Veyron? Meh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246818960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your balls drop, you might like to save money and get a Hayabusa (http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2008/08/12000-suzuki-hayabusa-outperfo.html).  It outperforms the Veyron...it's a physics thing.  When I've pointed this out to people in the past they say "Oh yes but a car is more practical".  Sure, a multimillion dollar car sounds very practical - I'd love to own one to do the shopping or take the kids to school!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your balls drop , you might like to save money and get a Hayabusa ( http : //hellforleathermagazine.com/2008/08/12000-suzuki-hayabusa-outperfo.html ) .
It outperforms the Veyron...it 's a physics thing .
When I 've pointed this out to people in the past they say " Oh yes but a car is more practical " .
Sure , a multimillion dollar car sounds very practical - I 'd love to own one to do the shopping or take the kids to school !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your balls drop, you might like to save money and get a Hayabusa (http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2008/08/12000-suzuki-hayabusa-outperfo.html).
It outperforms the Veyron...it's a physics thing.
When I've pointed this out to people in the past they say "Oh yes but a car is more practical".
Sure, a multimillion dollar car sounds very practical - I'd love to own one to do the shopping or take the kids to school!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591731</id>
	<title>Re:Bugatti Veyron = 27 MP3's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246910580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you know of a pawn shop that accepts MP3's for 10\% of value? I'd like a few dozen Veyrons...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know of a pawn shop that accepts MP3 's for 10 \ % of value ?
I 'd like a few dozen Veyrons.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know of a pawn shop that accepts MP3's for 10\% of value?
I'd like a few dozen Veyrons...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598403</id>
	<title>Re:Veyron? Meh.</title>
	<author>JoJo's883</author>
	<datestamp>1246912200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I beg to differ on your comparison of handling capabilities between a motorcycle and a car. I will concede that it is much easier for the average person to learn to drive fairly fast in a car as opposed to on a motorcycle. However as a former professional motorcycle racer I would contend that had your opponent been a well trained and experienced rider you would most likely have been left far behind. Even if the cornering capabilities were conceded to your car, (which I don't agree to) the braking and acceleration capabilities of the MC you describe give it the ability to brake much later into the corners and accelerate much sooner coming out of the corners.

This sounds more like a case of a semi skilled car driver up against an unskilled motorcycle rider. If you ever get to Illinois I will be happy to give you another go against a motorcycle and mine is nowhere near what you describe above. You just need to be prepared to have to tell your friends that you got dusted on a back road by a Harley Sportster.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-}

I will agree to your final statement on the possibility of becoming an organ donor in the event of going down at speed on a bike.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I beg to differ on your comparison of handling capabilities between a motorcycle and a car .
I will concede that it is much easier for the average person to learn to drive fairly fast in a car as opposed to on a motorcycle .
However as a former professional motorcycle racer I would contend that had your opponent been a well trained and experienced rider you would most likely have been left far behind .
Even if the cornering capabilities were conceded to your car , ( which I do n't agree to ) the braking and acceleration capabilities of the MC you describe give it the ability to brake much later into the corners and accelerate much sooner coming out of the corners .
This sounds more like a case of a semi skilled car driver up against an unskilled motorcycle rider .
If you ever get to Illinois I will be happy to give you another go against a motorcycle and mine is nowhere near what you describe above .
You just need to be prepared to have to tell your friends that you got dusted on a back road by a Harley Sportster .
; - } I will agree to your final statement on the possibility of becoming an organ donor in the event of going down at speed on a bike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I beg to differ on your comparison of handling capabilities between a motorcycle and a car.
I will concede that it is much easier for the average person to learn to drive fairly fast in a car as opposed to on a motorcycle.
However as a former professional motorcycle racer I would contend that had your opponent been a well trained and experienced rider you would most likely have been left far behind.
Even if the cornering capabilities were conceded to your car, (which I don't agree to) the braking and acceleration capabilities of the MC you describe give it the ability to brake much later into the corners and accelerate much sooner coming out of the corners.
This sounds more like a case of a semi skilled car driver up against an unskilled motorcycle rider.
If you ever get to Illinois I will be happy to give you another go against a motorcycle and mine is nowhere near what you describe above.
You just need to be prepared to have to tell your friends that you got dusted on a back road by a Harley Sportster.
;-}

I will agree to your final statement on the possibility of becoming an organ donor in the event of going down at speed on a bike.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</id>
	<title>Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1246821180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.</p><p>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.  Wired used to be something to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/read/.</p><p>Now?  We have this.  A fluff advertisement column, but not only that, nothing about the tech end at all.  Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it's a fast car and costs a lot of money.  It's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary.  Wired has become Maxim, but without the girls.</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.Wired used to be cool and had decent writers .
Wired used to be something to /read/.Now ?
We have this .
A fluff advertisement column , but not only that , nothing about the tech end at all .
Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it 's a fast car and costs a lot of money .
It 's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary .
Wired has become Maxim , but without the girls.--BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.
Wired used to be something to /read/.Now?
We have this.
A fluff advertisement column, but not only that, nothing about the tech end at all.
Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it's a fast car and costs a lot of money.
It's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary.
Wired has become Maxim, but without the girls.--BMO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595479</id>
	<title>Subliminal Phallus?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246900260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one to notice this?  Could it be intentional?</p><p>http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6672/lolpenis.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one to notice this ?
Could it be intentional ? http : //img186.imageshack.us/img186/6672/lolpenis.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one to notice this?
Could it be intentional?http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6672/lolpenis.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592961</id>
	<title>Just proves there's a market for anything</title>
	<author>derspankster</author>
	<datestamp>1246885500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somewhere there's a few well heeled individuals that just have to own something like this.  And, it is a massive engineering feat. I have no doubt that beneficial technology will trickle down to the manufacturing of real practical transportation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere there 's a few well heeled individuals that just have to own something like this .
And , it is a massive engineering feat .
I have no doubt that beneficial technology will trickle down to the manufacturing of real practical transportation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere there's a few well heeled individuals that just have to own something like this.
And, it is a massive engineering feat.
I have no doubt that beneficial technology will trickle down to the manufacturing of real practical transportation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</id>
	<title>Play on player</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1246823400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example. But having accepted it as an adult, the world is not fair, I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity. If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to "fluff" then so be it. We should be encouraging them every chance we can. It's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor. There's a sucker born every minute, at least with the Bugatti you get a truly well crafted machine that will be rare for the rest of your life and on and on. This machine will also appreciate in value, because like I said, there's one born every minute. If you want to piss your hard earned (or not) money, then who am I to stop you. Play on player. But bear in mind, it's still just a car. One awesome fucking car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor , pointing to this type of excess as an example .
But having accepted it as an adult , the world is not fair , I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity .
If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to " fluff " then so be it .
We should be encouraging them every chance we can .
It 's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor .
There 's a sucker born every minute , at least with the Bugatti you get a truly well crafted machine that will be rare for the rest of your life and on and on .
This machine will also appreciate in value , because like I said , there 's one born every minute .
If you want to piss your hard earned ( or not ) money , then who am I to stop you .
Play on player .
But bear in mind , it 's still just a car .
One awesome fucking car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example.
But having accepted it as an adult, the world is not fair, I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity.
If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to "fluff" then so be it.
We should be encouraging them every chance we can.
It's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor.
There's a sucker born every minute, at least with the Bugatti you get a truly well crafted machine that will be rare for the rest of your life and on and on.
This machine will also appreciate in value, because like I said, there's one born every minute.
If you want to piss your hard earned (or not) money, then who am I to stop you.
Play on player.
But bear in mind, it's still just a car.
One awesome fucking car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865</id>
	<title>Hell yeah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246814820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet you could rack mount a couple servers in the trunk (1U). Fastest datacenter on Earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet you could rack mount a couple servers in the trunk ( 1U ) .
Fastest datacenter on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet you could rack mount a couple servers in the trunk (1U).
Fastest datacenter on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853</id>
	<title>Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246814760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does it run linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does it run linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does it run linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592879</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1246884780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.</i></p><p>Yeah, sure.  I bet they'll be called Volkswagen.  Oh, wait<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a ( obviously lower ) luxury market very soon , cashing in on the recognition they 've earned.Yeah , sure .
I bet they 'll be called Volkswagen .
Oh , wait . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.Yeah, sure.
I bet they'll be called Volkswagen.
Oh, wait ..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592149</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246873500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. &lt;randy marsh&gt;I can't go back to Wired now!&lt;/randy marsh&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
I ca n't go back to Wired now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
I can't go back to Wired now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595541</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1246900560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then there's the <a href="http://www.bigredcamaro.com/newsite/magazines3/hr9l.html" title="bigredcamaro.com">Big Red Camaro</a> [bigredcamaro.com]. It hit 222 MPH on a twisty Nevada highway and averaged 197 MPH for the entire run, back in '89.</p><p><i>WHAM! The Camaro shot forward, straining on the edge of traction on the shaved Goodyear Z-rated Eagles.</i></p><p><i>WHAM! R.J. shifted into second and squeezed the throttle till the rear broke loose, then eased off to get a grip again. The faces on the starting line, once individual, blurred into one long line of eyes and smiles and open mouths.</i></p><p><i>WHAM! We were in third gear and the wind was beginning to roar outside the side window. Man, are going fast! But as the engine sliced through the rpm, I knew we weren't going half as fast as we would be going. About the time the tach read 7000 rpm in third gear, the road had shrunk to about half as narrow as it was when we shifted to third. We were flat cooking.</i></p><p><i>The shift into fourth wasn't quite as violent. The 2.52 rear gear was tall enough to take the edge off the torque, and the car just seemed to squirt smoothly up to light speed. The tach settled in at 6500 rpm, or roughly 200 MPH, and I swear that I was seeing the shif of light from the doppler effect that occurs at relativistic speeds.</i></p><p><i>As we descended into the valley and denser air, the engine made more power and climbed to 7000 rpm. I remember Bill Osborne saying, "If you see 7000 rpm in fourth, you're going 220 MPG."</i></p><p>--Joe Pettitt, Hot Rod magazine, Feb. 1990.</p><p>This was from the 1989 <a href="http://www.silverstateclassic.com/history.htm" title="silverstateclassic.com">Nevada Silver State Challenge</a> [silverstateclassic.com] open road race. They shut down 90 miles of state highway and let you go as fast as you can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then there 's the Big Red Camaro [ bigredcamaro.com ] .
It hit 222 MPH on a twisty Nevada highway and averaged 197 MPH for the entire run , back in '89.WHAM !
The Camaro shot forward , straining on the edge of traction on the shaved Goodyear Z-rated Eagles.WHAM !
R.J. shifted into second and squeezed the throttle till the rear broke loose , then eased off to get a grip again .
The faces on the starting line , once individual , blurred into one long line of eyes and smiles and open mouths.WHAM !
We were in third gear and the wind was beginning to roar outside the side window .
Man , are going fast !
But as the engine sliced through the rpm , I knew we were n't going half as fast as we would be going .
About the time the tach read 7000 rpm in third gear , the road had shrunk to about half as narrow as it was when we shifted to third .
We were flat cooking.The shift into fourth was n't quite as violent .
The 2.52 rear gear was tall enough to take the edge off the torque , and the car just seemed to squirt smoothly up to light speed .
The tach settled in at 6500 rpm , or roughly 200 MPH , and I swear that I was seeing the shif of light from the doppler effect that occurs at relativistic speeds.As we descended into the valley and denser air , the engine made more power and climbed to 7000 rpm .
I remember Bill Osborne saying , " If you see 7000 rpm in fourth , you 're going 220 MPG .
" --Joe Pettitt , Hot Rod magazine , Feb. 1990.This was from the 1989 Nevada Silver State Challenge [ silverstateclassic.com ] open road race .
They shut down 90 miles of state highway and let you go as fast as you can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then there's the Big Red Camaro [bigredcamaro.com].
It hit 222 MPH on a twisty Nevada highway and averaged 197 MPH for the entire run, back in '89.WHAM!
The Camaro shot forward, straining on the edge of traction on the shaved Goodyear Z-rated Eagles.WHAM!
R.J. shifted into second and squeezed the throttle till the rear broke loose, then eased off to get a grip again.
The faces on the starting line, once individual, blurred into one long line of eyes and smiles and open mouths.WHAM!
We were in third gear and the wind was beginning to roar outside the side window.
Man, are going fast!
But as the engine sliced through the rpm, I knew we weren't going half as fast as we would be going.
About the time the tach read 7000 rpm in third gear, the road had shrunk to about half as narrow as it was when we shifted to third.
We were flat cooking.The shift into fourth wasn't quite as violent.
The 2.52 rear gear was tall enough to take the edge off the torque, and the car just seemed to squirt smoothly up to light speed.
The tach settled in at 6500 rpm, or roughly 200 MPH, and I swear that I was seeing the shif of light from the doppler effect that occurs at relativistic speeds.As we descended into the valley and denser air, the engine made more power and climbed to 7000 rpm.
I remember Bill Osborne saying, "If you see 7000 rpm in fourth, you're going 220 MPG.
"--Joe Pettitt, Hot Rod magazine, Feb. 1990.This was from the 1989 Nevada Silver State Challenge [silverstateclassic.com] open road race.
They shut down 90 miles of state highway and let you go as fast as you can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237</id>
	<title>My question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246818360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What advantages does this motor car have over, say, a train -- which I could also afford?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What advantages does this motor car have over , say , a train -- which I could also afford ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What advantages does this motor car have over, say, a train -- which I could also afford?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590889</id>
	<title>Guilty conscience?</title>
	<author>andytrevino</author>
	<datestamp>1246815120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's the "guilty conscience" wisecrack for? This thing is not only incredibly cool, but if you can afford it, you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city. Get over it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the " guilty conscience " wisecrack for ?
This thing is not only incredibly cool , but if you can afford it , you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city .
Get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the "guilty conscience" wisecrack for?
This thing is not only incredibly cool, but if you can afford it, you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city.
Get over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592283</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246875780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, you cannot resist the urge to commit a felony (destruction of property over $1000 in almost any area of the US is a felony) and face prison time because someone chose to sink some of their cash into an expensive vehicle.</p><p>Wow, I'd hate to let you near a data center, because it isn't that much of a jump from keying someone's car to trashing a business's livelihood.</p><p>Good luck finding a job other than stirring carrots with an oar in a prison kitchen for two cents an hour with that attitude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you can not resist the urge to commit a felony ( destruction of property over $ 1000 in almost any area of the US is a felony ) and face prison time because someone chose to sink some of their cash into an expensive vehicle.Wow , I 'd hate to let you near a data center , because it is n't that much of a jump from keying someone 's car to trashing a business 's livelihood.Good luck finding a job other than stirring carrots with an oar in a prison kitchen for two cents an hour with that attitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you cannot resist the urge to commit a felony (destruction of property over $1000 in almost any area of the US is a felony) and face prison time because someone chose to sink some of their cash into an expensive vehicle.Wow, I'd hate to let you near a data center, because it isn't that much of a jump from keying someone's car to trashing a business's livelihood.Good luck finding a job other than stirring carrots with an oar in a prison kitchen for two cents an hour with that attitude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594653</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1246896240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you really RTFA? Yes, he's performing literary fellatio on the engineers of Bugatti, but he mentions the specs and lots of information (at least, as much as is usually provided about a car) about halfway down the page.<br>I agree that Wired used to be a bit more interesting, but this isn't really <i>that</i> bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you really RTFA ?
Yes , he 's performing literary fellatio on the engineers of Bugatti , but he mentions the specs and lots of information ( at least , as much as is usually provided about a car ) about halfway down the page.I agree that Wired used to be a bit more interesting , but this is n't really that bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you really RTFA?
Yes, he's performing literary fellatio on the engineers of Bugatti, but he mentions the specs and lots of information (at least, as much as is usually provided about a car) about halfway down the page.I agree that Wired used to be a bit more interesting, but this isn't really that bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592819</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>turtleAJ</author>
	<datestamp>1246884060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers. Wired used to be something to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/read/.</i></p><p>Amen to THAT!<br>I stopped reading Wired about 8 years ago...</p><p>Another magazine to which that happened:<br>- Popular Science (now Popular Mechanics is better! WTF!!)</p><p>PS: PUBLIC MSG TO WIRED:<br>Guys, I never renewed my subscription.<br>As such, I never cared much when you kept sending them (duplicates, every month!).<br>Would you please stop sending me bill collection letters?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers .
Wired used to be something to /read/.Amen to THAT ! I stopped reading Wired about 8 years ago...Another magazine to which that happened : - Popular Science ( now Popular Mechanics is better !
WTF ! ! ) PS : PUBLIC MSG TO WIRED : Guys , I never renewed my subscription.As such , I never cared much when you kept sending them ( duplicates , every month !
) .Would you please stop sending me bill collection letters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.
Wired used to be something to /read/.Amen to THAT!I stopped reading Wired about 8 years ago...Another magazine to which that happened:- Popular Science (now Popular Mechanics is better!
WTF!!)PS: PUBLIC MSG TO WIRED:Guys, I never renewed my subscription.As such, I never cared much when you kept sending them (duplicates, every month!
).Would you please stop sending me bill collection letters?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591537</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does the possession of money equate to deserving a keyed car?</p><p>Idea for you: get off Slashdot, finish your high school diploma, and get a job.  You can buy nice things with the money you earn.  Maybe you'll lose the desire to destroy other people's things too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does the possession of money equate to deserving a keyed car ? Idea for you : get off Slashdot , finish your high school diploma , and get a job .
You can buy nice things with the money you earn .
Maybe you 'll lose the desire to destroy other people 's things too : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does the possession of money equate to deserving a keyed car?Idea for you: get off Slashdot, finish your high school diploma, and get a job.
You can buy nice things with the money you earn.
Maybe you'll lose the desire to destroy other people's things too :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591311</id>
	<title>Veyron is not the most ridiculous car ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246819020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Porsche Cayenne is.</p><p>At least Veyron has a purpose. It's a sports car designed to drive extremely fast. The price is irrelevant.</p><p>The Porsche Cayenne is a 4x4 car that can only be driven on a plain asphalted road. There is absolutely no reason for it to be as huge as it is. It's a formula 1 car on steroids. It's like a a body builder, it only looks like it's strong but in reality it's not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Porsche Cayenne is.At least Veyron has a purpose .
It 's a sports car designed to drive extremely fast .
The price is irrelevant.The Porsche Cayenne is a 4x4 car that can only be driven on a plain asphalted road .
There is absolutely no reason for it to be as huge as it is .
It 's a formula 1 car on steroids .
It 's like a a body builder , it only looks like it 's strong but in reality it 's not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Porsche Cayenne is.At least Veyron has a purpose.
It's a sports car designed to drive extremely fast.
The price is irrelevant.The Porsche Cayenne is a 4x4 car that can only be driven on a plain asphalted road.
There is absolutely no reason for it to be as huge as it is.
It's a formula 1 car on steroids.
It's like a a body builder, it only looks like it's strong but in reality it's not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592701</id>
	<title>I dont see what all the fuss is.</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1246882860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>sure bugatti carries an exclusive pricetag, but its not THAT expensive.  i traded my old one in last month for $450k so i could upgrade to this years model with IPod support. <br> <br>
now, ive heard slashdotters ramble on about global warming and of course im concerned as well.  To make sure i dont contribute to the problem i make sure the tires are always properly inflated so they never get too hot on the road.  I also try to park in the garage so i dont reflect any o-zone into the atmosphere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>sure bugatti carries an exclusive pricetag , but its not THAT expensive .
i traded my old one in last month for $ 450k so i could upgrade to this years model with IPod support .
now , ive heard slashdotters ramble on about global warming and of course im concerned as well .
To make sure i dont contribute to the problem i make sure the tires are always properly inflated so they never get too hot on the road .
I also try to park in the garage so i dont reflect any o-zone into the atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sure bugatti carries an exclusive pricetag, but its not THAT expensive.
i traded my old one in last month for $450k so i could upgrade to this years model with IPod support.
now, ive heard slashdotters ramble on about global warming and of course im concerned as well.
To make sure i dont contribute to the problem i make sure the tires are always properly inflated so they never get too hot on the road.
I also try to park in the garage so i dont reflect any o-zone into the atmosphere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594677</id>
	<title>Terrific savings!</title>
	<author>DavidHumus</author>
	<datestamp>1246896360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since I don't own a car, the Bugatti Veyron is the car I've chosen not to own.</p><p>This new model is great news for me, as now I'm saving over $2 million by not owning it, as opposed to the mere $1.5 million savings I used to get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since I do n't own a car , the Bugatti Veyron is the car I 've chosen not to own.This new model is great news for me , as now I 'm saving over $ 2 million by not owning it , as opposed to the mere $ 1.5 million savings I used to get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since I don't own a car, the Bugatti Veyron is the car I've chosen not to own.This new model is great news for me, as now I'm saving over $2 million by not owning it, as opposed to the mere $1.5 million savings I used to get.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</id>
	<title>It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1246815600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo\_vehicle" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo\_vehicle</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br>
The whole point of a halo car is to demonstrate engineering prowess and/or get PR for the company.  It certainly worked; Bugatti went from being a maliase-y brand nobody had heard of, to a brand almost any 18 year old kid and any car enthusiast worth his salt knows about.  It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo \ _vehicle [ wikipedia.org ] The whole point of a halo car is to demonstrate engineering prowess and/or get PR for the company .
It certainly worked ; Bugatti went from being a maliase-y brand nobody had heard of , to a brand almost any 18 year old kid and any car enthusiast worth his salt knows about .
It would n't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a ( obviously lower ) luxury market very soon , cashing in on the recognition they 've earned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo\_vehicle [wikipedia.org]

The whole point of a halo car is to demonstrate engineering prowess and/or get PR for the company.
It certainly worked; Bugatti went from being a maliase-y brand nobody had heard of, to a brand almost any 18 year old kid and any car enthusiast worth his salt knows about.
It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598907</id>
	<title>No cup holders?</title>
	<author>nsaspook</author>
	<datestamp>1246871460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just throw my empty Hamms cans out the window anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just throw my empty Hamms cans out the window anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just throw my empty Hamms cans out the window anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590981</id>
	<title>Re:Guilty conscience?</title>
	<author>tempguest</author>
	<datestamp>1246815960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if you can afford it, you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city. Get over it.</p></div><p>I doubt one is able to amass a fortune of over a billion dollars, without first learning how to exploit the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... if you can afford it , you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city .
Get over it.I doubt one is able to amass a fortune of over a billion dollars , without first learning how to exploit the U.S. Internal Revenue Code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... if you can afford it, you already pay enough taxes to support a small mid-American city.
Get over it.I doubt one is able to amass a fortune of over a billion dollars, without first learning how to exploit the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591013</id>
	<title>Car analogy</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1246816380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those needing a car analogy: it's like* a car.<br> <br>
*The value of "like" in this sentence is negligible, so the word may be omitted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those needing a car analogy : it 's like * a car .
* The value of " like " in this sentence is negligible , so the word may be omitted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those needing a car analogy: it's like* a car.
*The value of "like" in this sentence is negligible, so the word may be omitted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591885</id>
	<title>And why's that ridiculus?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246913160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Killer machines like fighter airplanes, tanks etc which *we pay* with our tax money cost similar amounts of $$$. And no one complains. So where's the problem? It is just a car.</p><p>Furthermore, there are plenty of footballers, TV stars and so on who earn a lot of money just because they're lucky. Do they worth their money?</p><p>And BTW the car is not so ugly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Killer machines like fighter airplanes , tanks etc which * we pay * with our tax money cost similar amounts of $ $ $ .
And no one complains .
So where 's the problem ?
It is just a car.Furthermore , there are plenty of footballers , TV stars and so on who earn a lot of money just because they 're lucky .
Do they worth their money ? And BTW the car is not so ugly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Killer machines like fighter airplanes, tanks etc which *we pay* with our tax money cost similar amounts of $$$.
And no one complains.
So where's the problem?
It is just a car.Furthermore, there are plenty of footballers, TV stars and so on who earn a lot of money just because they're lucky.
Do they worth their money?And BTW the car is not so ugly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591117</id>
	<title>It's rather small</title>
	<author>hoarier</author>
	<datestamp>1246817220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For enhanced automotive stupidity (extra length, extra ugliness, extra thirst, all-around extra arrogance), try <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxMxFE37Sxw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">a car with a 27-litre engine</a> [youtube.com]. As a bonus, you also get an extra hammy narration, so all in all it's just what your inner nine-year-old craves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For enhanced automotive stupidity ( extra length , extra ugliness , extra thirst , all-around extra arrogance ) , try a car with a 27-litre engine [ youtube.com ] .
As a bonus , you also get an extra hammy narration , so all in all it 's just what your inner nine-year-old craves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For enhanced automotive stupidity (extra length, extra ugliness, extra thirst, all-around extra arrogance), try a car with a 27-litre engine [youtube.com].
As a bonus, you also get an extra hammy narration, so all in all it's just what your inner nine-year-old craves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591871</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>the\_other\_chewey</author>
	<datestamp>1246912920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.</p></div><p>
Uhm, no. In wind energy, that's close to ancient history. Let's say 5000 kilowatts: <a href="http://www.repower.de/index.php?id=237&amp;L=1" title="repower.de">http://www.repower.de/index.php?id=237&amp;L=1</a> [repower.de] <br>
<br>
And that's a model that can be bought now, there are &gt;8MW models in development.<br>
<br>
750kW in a car is still a lot though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A single wind turbine , the really big kind they use in wind farms , generates about 1500 kilowatts .
Uhm , no .
In wind energy , that 's close to ancient history .
Let 's say 5000 kilowatts : http : //www.repower.de/index.php ? id = 237&amp;L = 1 [ repower.de ] And that 's a model that can be bought now , there are &gt; 8MW models in development .
750kW in a car is still a lot though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.
Uhm, no.
In wind energy, that's close to ancient history.
Let's say 5000 kilowatts: http://www.repower.de/index.php?id=237&amp;L=1 [repower.de] 

And that's a model that can be bought now, there are &gt;8MW models in development.
750kW in a car is still a lot though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591103</id>
	<title>Yeah, I know it's supposed to be sexy and all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246817100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a top speed of 245 mph</p></div><p>If you really need to get somewhere this fast, wouldn't it be more cost-effective to buy yourself a <i>plane</i>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a top speed of 245 mphIf you really need to get somewhere this fast , would n't it be more cost-effective to buy yourself a plane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a top speed of 245 mphIf you really need to get somewhere this fast, wouldn't it be more cost-effective to buy yourself a plane?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</id>
	<title>It is not about the top speed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246817760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is all about acceleration.  The "older" Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h (62 mph) in approximately 2.46 seconds.  This is very near motorcycle speeds.  So while the high end might be very high, the low end is where most people drive the thing.</p><p>Putting it into perspective, my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood.  Fast enough for as heavy as it is, and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds.  I've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds.  Her car has a speed limiter, but I've never got to the point where it has come into play.  In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough.  With my car, I've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165+ range.</p><p>Love to take a lap or two in one of these....</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is all about acceleration .
The " older " Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h ( 62 mph ) in approximately 2.46 seconds .
This is very near motorcycle speeds .
So while the high end might be very high , the low end is where most people drive the thing.Putting it into perspective , my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood .
Fast enough for as heavy as it is , and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds .
I 've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds .
Her car has a speed limiter , but I 've never got to the point where it has come into play .
In normal driving , that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough .
With my car , I 've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165 + range.Love to take a lap or two in one of these... .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is all about acceleration.
The "older" Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h (62 mph) in approximately 2.46 seconds.
This is very near motorcycle speeds.
So while the high end might be very high, the low end is where most people drive the thing.Putting it into perspective, my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood.
Fast enough for as heavy as it is, and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds.
I've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds.
Her car has a speed limiter, but I've never got to the point where it has come into play.
In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough.
With my car, I've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165+ range.Love to take a lap or two in one of these....
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592107</id>
	<title>It may be ridiculous....</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1246872840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but it will get you a blowjob easier than a PHD in physics would.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but it will get you a blowjob easier than a PHD in physics would .
: o (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but it will get you a blowjob easier than a PHD in physics would.
:o(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592597</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>Dr\_Barnowl</author>
	<datestamp>1246880580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought the first UK issue of Wired, and swore never to buy Wired again, ever, after approximately 4 minutes reading.</p><p>Utterly utterly dire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought the first UK issue of Wired , and swore never to buy Wired again , ever , after approximately 4 minutes reading.Utterly utterly dire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought the first UK issue of Wired, and swore never to buy Wired again, ever, after approximately 4 minutes reading.Utterly utterly dire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593507</id>
	<title>Sweet Baby</title>
	<author>Udigs</author>
	<datestamp>1246889520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Jesus</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Jesus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Jesus</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595695</id>
	<title>Neat engineerin feat, testosterone writen</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1246901160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That article was like reading a page from a le Carre spy novel.  I feel mildly thrilled and disgusted at the same time.</p><p>Why is it when the best of the best get together to make a neat machine, it has to be suffused with a bunch of creepy moneyed assholes?  A prerequisite for purchasing this car will be that you are an illegal arms merchant, drug dealer or a CEO for some Enron-style business model.  Honestly, corrupt bastards will make up MORE than half the clientele for a toy like this.  That's just how the system works.  What do they say?  "You can ask me how I made my first hundred million; I'd be happy to spell it all out for the Vanity Fair reporter.  But how I made my first ten million?  No.  Do not ask me that."</p><p>Ah well.  Even the author of this article was feeling nervous around the edges.  In the same way that "World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones", he was quite clear that this might well be the last king of the gas guzzlers.  The very same fuckers who drive these things will be the ones most intimately responsible for despoiling the human race to the point where nobody can drive anything on the planet's surface again.</p><p>Queasy.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That article was like reading a page from a le Carre spy novel .
I feel mildly thrilled and disgusted at the same time.Why is it when the best of the best get together to make a neat machine , it has to be suffused with a bunch of creepy moneyed assholes ?
A prerequisite for purchasing this car will be that you are an illegal arms merchant , drug dealer or a CEO for some Enron-style business model .
Honestly , corrupt bastards will make up MORE than half the clientele for a toy like this .
That 's just how the system works .
What do they say ?
" You can ask me how I made my first hundred million ; I 'd be happy to spell it all out for the Vanity Fair reporter .
But how I made my first ten million ?
No. Do not ask me that .
" Ah well .
Even the author of this article was feeling nervous around the edges .
In the same way that " World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones " , he was quite clear that this might well be the last king of the gas guzzlers .
The very same fuckers who drive these things will be the ones most intimately responsible for despoiling the human race to the point where nobody can drive anything on the planet 's surface again.Queasy.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That article was like reading a page from a le Carre spy novel.
I feel mildly thrilled and disgusted at the same time.Why is it when the best of the best get together to make a neat machine, it has to be suffused with a bunch of creepy moneyed assholes?
A prerequisite for purchasing this car will be that you are an illegal arms merchant, drug dealer or a CEO for some Enron-style business model.
Honestly, corrupt bastards will make up MORE than half the clientele for a toy like this.
That's just how the system works.
What do they say?
"You can ask me how I made my first hundred million; I'd be happy to spell it all out for the Vanity Fair reporter.
But how I made my first ten million?
No.  Do not ask me that.
"Ah well.
Even the author of this article was feeling nervous around the edges.
In the same way that "World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones", he was quite clear that this might well be the last king of the gas guzzlers.
The very same fuckers who drive these things will be the ones most intimately responsible for despoiling the human race to the point where nobody can drive anything on the planet's surface again.Queasy.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641</id>
	<title>I did the top speed in an S4..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246822980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an unrestricted S4, and removing the limiter is the only mod it has ever had.</p><p>Now it is 4 years old, I finally had the time and safe place to test the top speed (well, "top" as in "got clamped by the rev limited instead"), and I got to a GPS measured 268 km/h before the rev limiter kicked in.  It was somewhere in Germany, I happened upon this 5km stretch of perfect viewable road by chance (and had to drive another 5km before I found a chance to return and USE it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</p><p>Overtaking a row of 8 (I think) police vans at 220 km/h <b>on cruise control</b> during the run up was just a bonus (you know you're legal but still the nervousness remains).</p><p>There is, however, a good argument why you won't do this for long even if it's entirely legal and you find a safe bit of road to test.  With a fuel consumption of just under 60 (yes, SIXTY) liters per 100km you will need a MUCH bigger tank to get from A to B.  It's ridiculously uneconomical to push such a large amount of steel over 4 wheels against the wind.</p><p>Having said that, it's also good fun annoying BMW drivers who don't seem to know that "S4" means "brutally large factory sports tuned V8 in front, gripping on 4 wheels on sport suspension".  Fnarr fnarr..</p><p>Conversions (all approx):<br>268 km/h = 166.5 mph<br>60l/100km = 1.67km/l, 4.7 MPG(UK) or 3.9 MPG(US)</p><p>Final notes for wannabees: I have had extensive high speed training.  Don't try this stuff unless you're (a) stone sober and in top physical condition, (b) are 100\% sure of the condition and capabilities of your car (and even then), (c) on location where such speeds are legal and (d) can do so without causing any risk to other road users (on circuit is even better) - and that's after doing some test runs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an unrestricted S4 , and removing the limiter is the only mod it has ever had.Now it is 4 years old , I finally had the time and safe place to test the top speed ( well , " top " as in " got clamped by the rev limited instead " ) , and I got to a GPS measured 268 km/h before the rev limiter kicked in .
It was somewhere in Germany , I happened upon this 5km stretch of perfect viewable road by chance ( and had to drive another 5km before I found a chance to return and USE it : - ) .Overtaking a row of 8 ( I think ) police vans at 220 km/h on cruise control during the run up was just a bonus ( you know you 're legal but still the nervousness remains ) .There is , however , a good argument why you wo n't do this for long even if it 's entirely legal and you find a safe bit of road to test .
With a fuel consumption of just under 60 ( yes , SIXTY ) liters per 100km you will need a MUCH bigger tank to get from A to B. It 's ridiculously uneconomical to push such a large amount of steel over 4 wheels against the wind.Having said that , it 's also good fun annoying BMW drivers who do n't seem to know that " S4 " means " brutally large factory sports tuned V8 in front , gripping on 4 wheels on sport suspension " .
Fnarr fnarr..Conversions ( all approx ) : 268 km/h = 166.5 mph60l/100km = 1.67km/l , 4.7 MPG ( UK ) or 3.9 MPG ( US ) Final notes for wannabees : I have had extensive high speed training .
Do n't try this stuff unless you 're ( a ) stone sober and in top physical condition , ( b ) are 100 \ % sure of the condition and capabilities of your car ( and even then ) , ( c ) on location where such speeds are legal and ( d ) can do so without causing any risk to other road users ( on circuit is even better ) - and that 's after doing some test runs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an unrestricted S4, and removing the limiter is the only mod it has ever had.Now it is 4 years old, I finally had the time and safe place to test the top speed (well, "top" as in "got clamped by the rev limited instead"), and I got to a GPS measured 268 km/h before the rev limiter kicked in.
It was somewhere in Germany, I happened upon this 5km stretch of perfect viewable road by chance (and had to drive another 5km before I found a chance to return and USE it :-).Overtaking a row of 8 (I think) police vans at 220 km/h on cruise control during the run up was just a bonus (you know you're legal but still the nervousness remains).There is, however, a good argument why you won't do this for long even if it's entirely legal and you find a safe bit of road to test.
With a fuel consumption of just under 60 (yes, SIXTY) liters per 100km you will need a MUCH bigger tank to get from A to B.  It's ridiculously uneconomical to push such a large amount of steel over 4 wheels against the wind.Having said that, it's also good fun annoying BMW drivers who don't seem to know that "S4" means "brutally large factory sports tuned V8 in front, gripping on 4 wheels on sport suspension".
Fnarr fnarr..Conversions (all approx):268 km/h = 166.5 mph60l/100km = 1.67km/l, 4.7 MPG(UK) or 3.9 MPG(US)Final notes for wannabees: I have had extensive high speed training.
Don't try this stuff unless you're (a) stone sober and in top physical condition, (b) are 100\% sure of the condition and capabilities of your car (and even then), (c) on location where such speeds are legal and (d) can do so without causing any risk to other road users (on circuit is even better) - and that's after doing some test runs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594691</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246896420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example.</p></div> </blockquote><p>What bothered me was never the gap, but <i>the way</i> that gap was both created and maintained. Over the last 30 years, that gap has widened considerably. And most of that gap is made from the rich getting a LOT richer under a system of rules stacked in their favour. There is very little chance of any poor person with talent and drive making it to the top, and there is almost no chance of someone with no talent, or skills, and little worth of falling from the top under any circumstances.</p><p>Witness golden parachutes for the people who brought the world economy to its knees, while people who actually work for a living get fired left and right. This is the logically inevitable conclusion of the system that has been promoted for the last three decades.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor , pointing to this type of excess as an example .
What bothered me was never the gap , but the way that gap was both created and maintained .
Over the last 30 years , that gap has widened considerably .
And most of that gap is made from the rich getting a LOT richer under a system of rules stacked in their favour .
There is very little chance of any poor person with talent and drive making it to the top , and there is almost no chance of someone with no talent , or skills , and little worth of falling from the top under any circumstances.Witness golden parachutes for the people who brought the world economy to its knees , while people who actually work for a living get fired left and right .
This is the logically inevitable conclusion of the system that has been promoted for the last three decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example.
What bothered me was never the gap, but the way that gap was both created and maintained.
Over the last 30 years, that gap has widened considerably.
And most of that gap is made from the rich getting a LOT richer under a system of rules stacked in their favour.
There is very little chance of any poor person with talent and drive making it to the top, and there is almost no chance of someone with no talent, or skills, and little worth of falling from the top under any circumstances.Witness golden parachutes for the people who brought the world economy to its knees, while people who actually work for a living get fired left and right.
This is the logically inevitable conclusion of the system that has been promoted for the last three decades.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</id>
	<title>In real units...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246820340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts. Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts. A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.<p>

1000 horsepower is a <i>lot</i> of power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts .
Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts .
A single wind turbine , the really big kind they use in wind farms , generates about 1500 kilowatts .
1000 horsepower is a lot of power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...1000 horsepower is 750 kilowatts.
Your average house electricity supply is 30 kilowatts.
A single wind turbine, the really big kind they use in wind farms, generates about 1500 kilowatts.
1000 horsepower is a lot of power.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592617</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246880940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Set aside the engine produces a lot more. 4K hp i think. Most of it goes to to cooling though. The thing has about a dozen radiators.</p><p>A testament to the inefficiency of the idiotic ICE.</p><p>Die. Die. DIE DAMNIT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Set aside the engine produces a lot more .
4K hp i think .
Most of it goes to to cooling though .
The thing has about a dozen radiators.A testament to the inefficiency of the idiotic ICE.Die .
Die. DIE DAMNIT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Set aside the engine produces a lot more.
4K hp i think.
Most of it goes to to cooling though.
The thing has about a dozen radiators.A testament to the inefficiency of the idiotic ICE.Die.
Die. DIE DAMNIT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594635</id>
	<title>Re:Hell yeah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246896180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A very smart and diplomatic answer. It&#226;(TM)s really appreciable and generous.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; attorneys </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A very smart and diplomatic answer .
It   ( TM ) s really appreciable and generous .
        attorneys</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A very smart and diplomatic answer.
Itâ(TM)s really appreciable and generous.
        attorneys </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593245</id>
	<title>Re:Newest addition?</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1246887840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Veyron has been around since 2005 -- this is the new convertible version.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Veyron has been around since 2005 -- this is the new convertible version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Veyron has been around since 2005 -- this is the new convertible version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592855</id>
	<title>I want two</title>
	<author>bryan1945</author>
	<datestamp>1246884420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.</p><p>The top-down is limited to a mere 217 MPH?  I really, really hope no one takes a dog along for one of those rides.  You know how dogs like to stick their heads out the window?  Here, either the dog becomes a kite or its head inverts.</p><p>This is assigned to the BatCave of coolness.  I love reading about the engineering aspects.  Just the concept of producing a car that can go over 200 MPH with no top (that's insane aerodynamics) and not rip apart the whole thing?  Add wings and the thing could glide for, well maybe 200 feet (it is 4000 pounds), but still!  Need to find more info about the engine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.The top-down is limited to a mere 217 MPH ?
I really , really hope no one takes a dog along for one of those rides .
You know how dogs like to stick their heads out the window ?
Here , either the dog becomes a kite or its head inverts.This is assigned to the BatCave of coolness .
I love reading about the engineering aspects .
Just the concept of producing a car that can go over 200 MPH with no top ( that 's insane aerodynamics ) and not rip apart the whole thing ?
Add wings and the thing could glide for , well maybe 200 feet ( it is 4000 pounds ) , but still !
Need to find more info about the engine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.The top-down is limited to a mere 217 MPH?
I really, really hope no one takes a dog along for one of those rides.
You know how dogs like to stick their heads out the window?
Here, either the dog becomes a kite or its head inverts.This is assigned to the BatCave of coolness.
I love reading about the engineering aspects.
Just the concept of producing a car that can go over 200 MPH with no top (that's insane aerodynamics) and not rip apart the whole thing?
Add wings and the thing could glide for, well maybe 200 feet (it is 4000 pounds), but still!
Need to find more info about the engine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591515</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1246821240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>does it run linux?</i></p><p>I don't know about the Veyron, but the Tesla Roadster does.  I have one of the logs right here.  2.6.11.8-1.3.0, BusyBox 1.00, 32 megs ram, Philips-LPC2294 CPU, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does it run linux ? I do n't know about the Veyron , but the Tesla Roadster does .
I have one of the logs right here .
2.6.11.8-1.3.0 , BusyBox 1.00 , 32 megs ram , Philips-LPC2294 CPU , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does it run linux?I don't know about the Veyron, but the Tesla Roadster does.
I have one of the logs right here.
2.6.11.8-1.3.0, BusyBox 1.00, 32 megs ram, Philips-LPC2294 CPU, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598081</id>
	<title>Re:Why should I care? Why must I have an opinion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246910820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, I have been on Slashdot for a while, and its rare where you encounter a post that isn't a Goatse troll that not only has not even a single shred of truth in it, but the poster is unable to spell critical names.</p><p>Reagan did nothing new.  He removed regulations for cronies in the bank industry and allowed financial institutions to do things which were not legal before.  Of course, allowing banks to do creative accounting will let banks net more money in the short term.  However, after this, the Federal government had to bailout all the thrifts in the big S&amp;L scandal of the 1980s.</p><p>Similar with Bush.  Yes, it made the economy zoom for a bit, but it didn't last long before the US government had to clean up the mess after the party.  This time around, due to "free trade" agreements which have bled the US dry, the US doesn't have the resources it did in Reagan's time to clean up the mess.  Instead, the Fed is resorting to the printing press.  Right now, it works, and has stopped the bleeding, but it would not take much for the US dollar to hyperinflate and become worthless.</p><p>Oh, shut up about the socialist thing.  It has nothing to do with banking.  The only country that is not socialist in some way is Somalia where you don't have to pay any taxes to the government for anything... just make sure you have more AKs and RPGs than the next guy, or hand all your stuff to the guy pointing the M-16 in your direction.</p><p>Obama isn't going to turn the US into a Communist style USSR.  I say go back to your tea party and get more recent propaganda than the stuff you are spouting.  Its way old, and last year's BS.  It also doesn't hurt to hit the gun shop on the way there and pick up some 50 cal ammo.  You never know if the aliens are coming either.</p><p>Your friends in AIG are doing nothing except just moving money from the US offshore.  They are parasites, pure and simple, and bring absolutely nothing of value to anyone except themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I have been on Slashdot for a while , and its rare where you encounter a post that is n't a Goatse troll that not only has not even a single shred of truth in it , but the poster is unable to spell critical names.Reagan did nothing new .
He removed regulations for cronies in the bank industry and allowed financial institutions to do things which were not legal before .
Of course , allowing banks to do creative accounting will let banks net more money in the short term .
However , after this , the Federal government had to bailout all the thrifts in the big S&amp;L scandal of the 1980s.Similar with Bush .
Yes , it made the economy zoom for a bit , but it did n't last long before the US government had to clean up the mess after the party .
This time around , due to " free trade " agreements which have bled the US dry , the US does n't have the resources it did in Reagan 's time to clean up the mess .
Instead , the Fed is resorting to the printing press .
Right now , it works , and has stopped the bleeding , but it would not take much for the US dollar to hyperinflate and become worthless.Oh , shut up about the socialist thing .
It has nothing to do with banking .
The only country that is not socialist in some way is Somalia where you do n't have to pay any taxes to the government for anything... just make sure you have more AKs and RPGs than the next guy , or hand all your stuff to the guy pointing the M-16 in your direction.Obama is n't going to turn the US into a Communist style USSR .
I say go back to your tea party and get more recent propaganda than the stuff you are spouting .
Its way old , and last year 's BS .
It also does n't hurt to hit the gun shop on the way there and pick up some 50 cal ammo .
You never know if the aliens are coming either.Your friends in AIG are doing nothing except just moving money from the US offshore .
They are parasites , pure and simple , and bring absolutely nothing of value to anyone except themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I have been on Slashdot for a while, and its rare where you encounter a post that isn't a Goatse troll that not only has not even a single shred of truth in it, but the poster is unable to spell critical names.Reagan did nothing new.
He removed regulations for cronies in the bank industry and allowed financial institutions to do things which were not legal before.
Of course, allowing banks to do creative accounting will let banks net more money in the short term.
However, after this, the Federal government had to bailout all the thrifts in the big S&amp;L scandal of the 1980s.Similar with Bush.
Yes, it made the economy zoom for a bit, but it didn't last long before the US government had to clean up the mess after the party.
This time around, due to "free trade" agreements which have bled the US dry, the US doesn't have the resources it did in Reagan's time to clean up the mess.
Instead, the Fed is resorting to the printing press.
Right now, it works, and has stopped the bleeding, but it would not take much for the US dollar to hyperinflate and become worthless.Oh, shut up about the socialist thing.
It has nothing to do with banking.
The only country that is not socialist in some way is Somalia where you don't have to pay any taxes to the government for anything... just make sure you have more AKs and RPGs than the next guy, or hand all your stuff to the guy pointing the M-16 in your direction.Obama isn't going to turn the US into a Communist style USSR.
I say go back to your tea party and get more recent propaganda than the stuff you are spouting.
Its way old, and last year's BS.
It also doesn't hurt to hit the gun shop on the way there and pick up some 50 cal ammo.
You never know if the aliens are coming either.Your friends in AIG are doing nothing except just moving money from the US offshore.
They are parasites, pure and simple, and bring absolutely nothing of value to anyone except themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594509</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707</id>
	<title>Re:Veyron? Meh.</title>
	<author>diskis</author>
	<datestamp>1246823760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a straight line yes, but with any kind of turns on the road the bike gets owned.<br>I mean, I have a Mazda MX-5, pretty much the cheapest roadster you can get. It has 160 hp on 950 kg, and I've left a bike with 120 hp on 200 kg behind on a very squiggly road. Bikes don't handle. And with a car, if you lose grip you have the possibility of getting back control. Lose control with a bike, and you are an organ donor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a straight line yes , but with any kind of turns on the road the bike gets owned.I mean , I have a Mazda MX-5 , pretty much the cheapest roadster you can get .
It has 160 hp on 950 kg , and I 've left a bike with 120 hp on 200 kg behind on a very squiggly road .
Bikes do n't handle .
And with a car , if you lose grip you have the possibility of getting back control .
Lose control with a bike , and you are an organ donor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a straight line yes, but with any kind of turns on the road the bike gets owned.I mean, I have a Mazda MX-5, pretty much the cheapest roadster you can get.
It has 160 hp on 950 kg, and I've left a bike with 120 hp on 200 kg behind on a very squiggly road.
Bikes don't handle.
And with a car, if you lose grip you have the possibility of getting back control.
Lose control with a bike, and you are an organ donor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594509</id>
	<title>Why should I care? Why must I have an opinion?</title>
	<author>WheelDweller</author>
	<datestamp>1246895520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ya know, back in the days when Capitalism was making us the envy of the world, what something cost wasn't generally important: just none of my business.</p><p>Sure, the '80's, when Regan came in and rescued us from the MISERABLE conditions of overtaxing and over-control via Jimmy Carter, being able to have a job became a bigger deal....having a house and a car were similarly more to cheer about, too.</p><p>But those guys at AIG? Federal guidelines had them getting paid only once a year.  A YEAR! Imagine living on nothing until Christmas. Then they cut a deal with the president, and the president's men shoved on-lookers and like a lynch mob, they took THAT away, as well.</p><p>When we go socialist- we're *ALL* going to be poor, not all going to be rich.  The only rich are the people in the politbureau; those in power. It will be them that buy this car.</p><p>And then it will be no one's business to know how much it costs; no one will advertise to the American public, whose electricity costs skyrocketed because Obama doesn't like coal.</p><p>Yeah, it's parly rant, but it's truth; and that's exactly why I expect to get modded down again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know , back in the days when Capitalism was making us the envy of the world , what something cost was n't generally important : just none of my business.Sure , the '80 's , when Regan came in and rescued us from the MISERABLE conditions of overtaxing and over-control via Jimmy Carter , being able to have a job became a bigger deal....having a house and a car were similarly more to cheer about , too.But those guys at AIG ?
Federal guidelines had them getting paid only once a year .
A YEAR !
Imagine living on nothing until Christmas .
Then they cut a deal with the president , and the president 's men shoved on-lookers and like a lynch mob , they took THAT away , as well.When we go socialist- we 're * ALL * going to be poor , not all going to be rich .
The only rich are the people in the politbureau ; those in power .
It will be them that buy this car.And then it will be no one 's business to know how much it costs ; no one will advertise to the American public , whose electricity costs skyrocketed because Obama does n't like coal.Yeah , it 's parly rant , but it 's truth ; and that 's exactly why I expect to get modded down again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know, back in the days when Capitalism was making us the envy of the world, what something cost wasn't generally important: just none of my business.Sure, the '80's, when Regan came in and rescued us from the MISERABLE conditions of overtaxing and over-control via Jimmy Carter, being able to have a job became a bigger deal....having a house and a car were similarly more to cheer about, too.But those guys at AIG?
Federal guidelines had them getting paid only once a year.
A YEAR!
Imagine living on nothing until Christmas.
Then they cut a deal with the president, and the president's men shoved on-lookers and like a lynch mob, they took THAT away, as well.When we go socialist- we're *ALL* going to be poor, not all going to be rich.
The only rich are the people in the politbureau; those in power.
It will be them that buy this car.And then it will be no one's business to know how much it costs; no one will advertise to the American public, whose electricity costs skyrocketed because Obama doesn't like coal.Yeah, it's parly rant, but it's truth; and that's exactly why I expect to get modded down again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593937</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>Shatrat</author>
	<datestamp>1246892220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's when they horde(sic) it away that truly screws the poor.</p> </div><p>Really?<br>
Nobody just puts millions under their mattress.  They invest it.  They buy some tax-free municipal bonds and the city gets some cheap financing to pay off some overbudgeted new intersection buildouts or city park or whatever.  They buy into a mutual fund and 100s of companies get a little more financing to fund expansion, new plants, acquisitions, etc.
<br>I'll tell you what overwhelmingly screws the poor. <br>Lotteries, rent-to-own, drug use and drug-using relatives who leech, credit card debt, etc.  Bernie Madoff isn't keeping my neighbors down, 9 times out of 10 they are.  Let's not forget to mention the common attitude that it isn't cool to be smart, study, work hard and try to get ahead.<br>I'm not saying it's the poor's fault that they are poor, but I am saying that anyone who makes it ahead has had to overcome a lot more cultural barriers from within the lower class than from without.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's when they horde ( sic ) it away that truly screws the poor .
Really ? Nobody just puts millions under their mattress .
They invest it .
They buy some tax-free municipal bonds and the city gets some cheap financing to pay off some overbudgeted new intersection buildouts or city park or whatever .
They buy into a mutual fund and 100s of companies get a little more financing to fund expansion , new plants , acquisitions , etc .
I 'll tell you what overwhelmingly screws the poor .
Lotteries , rent-to-own , drug use and drug-using relatives who leech , credit card debt , etc .
Bernie Madoff is n't keeping my neighbors down , 9 times out of 10 they are .
Let 's not forget to mention the common attitude that it is n't cool to be smart , study , work hard and try to get ahead.I 'm not saying it 's the poor 's fault that they are poor , but I am saying that anyone who makes it ahead has had to overcome a lot more cultural barriers from within the lower class than from without .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's when they horde(sic) it away that truly screws the poor.
Really?
Nobody just puts millions under their mattress.
They invest it.
They buy some tax-free municipal bonds and the city gets some cheap financing to pay off some overbudgeted new intersection buildouts or city park or whatever.
They buy into a mutual fund and 100s of companies get a little more financing to fund expansion, new plants, acquisitions, etc.
I'll tell you what overwhelmingly screws the poor.
Lotteries, rent-to-own, drug use and drug-using relatives who leech, credit card debt, etc.
Bernie Madoff isn't keeping my neighbors down, 9 times out of 10 they are.
Let's not forget to mention the common attitude that it isn't cool to be smart, study, work hard and try to get ahead.I'm not saying it's the poor's fault that they are poor, but I am saying that anyone who makes it ahead has had to overcome a lot more cultural barriers from within the lower class than from without.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593173</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>horza</author>
	<datestamp>1246887360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs. People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY <b>cowards</b>.</i></p><p>There, fixed that for you.</p><p>Phillip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ever caught you keying ANY car , I 'd break your fucking legs .
People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY cowards.There , fixed that for you.Phillip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs.
People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY cowards.There, fixed that for you.Phillip.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592981</id>
	<title>jealousy</title>
	<author>l3v1</author>
	<datestamp>1246885620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of you who keep trying to find excuses not to say this is a cool piece of equipment are just jealous. There are carmakers on this planet who have the knowledge, the manpower, the money, the vision to create, build and sell such machines. And this is awesome. Now come on, your wildest car-dreams probably wasn't about a Jetta, or a Civic. I really like to see such cars being built, not just for the speed and power, but for the quality of the whole package, the style, and the looks. We need the almost-insanely-above-the-higher-end category too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of you who keep trying to find excuses not to say this is a cool piece of equipment are just jealous .
There are carmakers on this planet who have the knowledge , the manpower , the money , the vision to create , build and sell such machines .
And this is awesome .
Now come on , your wildest car-dreams probably was n't about a Jetta , or a Civic .
I really like to see such cars being built , not just for the speed and power , but for the quality of the whole package , the style , and the looks .
We need the almost-insanely-above-the-higher-end category too : ) : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of you who keep trying to find excuses not to say this is a cool piece of equipment are just jealous.
There are carmakers on this planet who have the knowledge, the manpower, the money, the vision to create, build and sell such machines.
And this is awesome.
Now come on, your wildest car-dreams probably wasn't about a Jetta, or a Civic.
I really like to see such cars being built, not just for the speed and power, but for the quality of the whole package, the style, and the looks.
We need the almost-insanely-above-the-higher-end category too :) :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593613</id>
	<title>Save your money...</title>
	<author>clickety6</author>
	<datestamp>1246890060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...a penis extension can be had for a lot less than 2.1 million these days...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...a penis extension can be had for a lot less than 2.1 million these days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a penis extension can be had for a lot less than 2.1 million these days...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592169</id>
	<title>Re:I did the top speed in an S4..</title>
	<author>footnmouth</author>
	<datestamp>1246873980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heh, I had my 911 up to 172 in a similar situation and it was great fun.  Why am I posting this?  Because I'm selling it and my inner geek is very upset (note that I've repressed my inner geek as I'm actually married - I don't know why I've admitted this to Slashdot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-))</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , I had my 911 up to 172 in a similar situation and it was great fun .
Why am I posting this ?
Because I 'm selling it and my inner geek is very upset ( note that I 've repressed my inner geek as I 'm actually married - I do n't know why I 've admitted this to Slashdot : - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, I had my 911 up to 172 in a similar situation and it was great fun.
Why am I posting this?
Because I'm selling it and my inner geek is very upset (note that I've repressed my inner geek as I'm actually married - I don't know why I've admitted this to Slashdot :-))</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591817</id>
	<title>The fastest production car...</title>
	<author>incense</author>
	<datestamp>1246912200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fastest production car is not the Bugatti, but the SSC Ultimate Aero TT. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fastest\_car</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fastest production car is not the Bugatti , but the SSC Ultimate Aero TT .
According to http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fastest \ _car</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fastest production car is not the Bugatti, but the SSC Ultimate Aero TT.
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fastest\_car</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591257</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246818480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fuck yeah! legs are self-healing anyway.</p><p>idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck yeah !
legs are self-healing anyway.idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck yeah!
legs are self-healing anyway.idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594449</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>guacamole</author>
	<datestamp>1246895220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really doubt that the Halo car effect will help VW recover the money it has sunk into Bugatti, much less make any profit off it. For one, I don't think they want to move Bugatti brand down in the market. VW already has plenty of higher volume sports car brands. Moving down market, means Bugatti will be competing with VW's own Porsche, Lamborghini, and Audi's supercars like Audi R8. Staying up-market also doesn't seem to make much sense. No matter how much they charge for a single car, they will never recover the costs sunk into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really doubt that the Halo car effect will help VW recover the money it has sunk into Bugatti , much less make any profit off it .
For one , I do n't think they want to move Bugatti brand down in the market .
VW already has plenty of higher volume sports car brands .
Moving down market , means Bugatti will be competing with VW 's own Porsche , Lamborghini , and Audi 's supercars like Audi R8 .
Staying up-market also does n't seem to make much sense .
No matter how much they charge for a single car , they will never recover the costs sunk into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really doubt that the Halo car effect will help VW recover the money it has sunk into Bugatti, much less make any profit off it.
For one, I don't think they want to move Bugatti brand down in the market.
VW already has plenty of higher volume sports car brands.
Moving down market, means Bugatti will be competing with VW's own Porsche, Lamborghini, and Audi's supercars like Audi R8.
Staying up-market also doesn't seem to make much sense.
No matter how much they charge for a single car, they will never recover the costs sunk into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591267</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246818660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, posting physical threats and insults under the name "Goldberg's Pants" isn't the height of manhood, fuck face. Why are you even posting? Shouldn't you be manning the local glory hole? I took a dump an hour ago that had more fortitude then your sorry ass. GP may be an asshole, but you are the diseased shit that came out of it. Die. Just fucking die you pile of damp, stinking uselessness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , posting physical threats and insults under the name " Goldberg 's Pants " is n't the height of manhood , fuck face .
Why are you even posting ?
Should n't you be manning the local glory hole ?
I took a dump an hour ago that had more fortitude then your sorry ass .
GP may be an asshole , but you are the diseased shit that came out of it .
Die. Just fucking die you pile of damp , stinking uselessness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, posting physical threats and insults under the name "Goldberg's Pants" isn't the height of manhood, fuck face.
Why are you even posting?
Shouldn't you be manning the local glory hole?
I took a dump an hour ago that had more fortitude then your sorry ass.
GP may be an asshole, but you are the diseased shit that came out of it.
Die. Just fucking die you pile of damp, stinking uselessness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599075</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246872300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.</p></div><p>Thus, the comment about passive agression.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Thus , the comment about passive agression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.Thus, the comment about passive agression.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593691</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1246890660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds. You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly. About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.</p></div></blockquote><p>You've never heard of Interstate 95?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it , or any 200 + MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds .
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds , but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly .
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed * is * a test track with an enormous straight.You 've never heard of Interstate 95 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds.
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly.
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.You've never heard of Interstate 95?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591693</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1246823700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>God damn monkey fanbois.</htmltext>
<tokenext>God damn monkey fanbois .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God damn monkey fanbois.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591161</id>
	<title>Finance a car loan</title>
	<author>unlametheweak</author>
	<datestamp>1246817580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hell, in this economy, $2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout."</p></div><p>It's a car well suited to bankers who profited from the financial scandals and government bailouts.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , in this economy , $ 2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout .
" It 's a car well suited to bankers who profited from the financial scandals and government bailouts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, in this economy, $2.1 million is probably enough to make you a one-man special-interest group with some serious Washington clout.
"It's a car well suited to bankers who profited from the financial scandals and government bailouts.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594775</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1246896900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor.</p></div></blockquote><p>True.  Once a barbarian rabble have ridden off with it, it's gone for ever.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor.True .
Once a barbarian rabble have ridden off with it , it 's gone for ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's when they horde it away that truly screws the poor.True.
Once a barbarian rabble have ridden off with it, it's gone for ever.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592089</id>
	<title>The greatest achievements of the petroleum age?</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1246872540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The first Veyron is an engineering marvel... It stands as one of the greatest achievements of the petroleum age.</p></div><p>O RLY?</p><p>Top Gear's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top\_Gear\_Test\_Track#The\_Power\_Board.5B4.5D" title="wikipedia.org">power laps</a> [wikipedia.org] say otherwise.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first Veyron is an engineering marvel... It stands as one of the greatest achievements of the petroleum age.O RLY ? Top Gear 's power laps [ wikipedia.org ] say otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first Veyron is an engineering marvel... It stands as one of the greatest achievements of the petroleum age.O RLY?Top Gear's power laps [wikipedia.org] say otherwise.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593579</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>guisar</author>
	<datestamp>1246889880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the rich SHOULD blow their money on this type of insanity; much better than writing off that 2.1 million dollars (being picked up by you and the rest of this land's taxpayers in the form of offsetting their deduction) and being all sanctimonious about their donation to charity or building another "Microsoft wing" at MIT. Yeah, if I were that rich I'd get a Tesla but the point is this sort of excess and the fun which goes along with it is the only real useful point to being rich that I can see. Being a bitch, serving their own interests and bossing people around seems to be their normal mode of operation; I'd rather seem them out on the road enjoying themselves and leaving the rest of us to enjoy ourselves a bit more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the rich SHOULD blow their money on this type of insanity ; much better than writing off that 2.1 million dollars ( being picked up by you and the rest of this land 's taxpayers in the form of offsetting their deduction ) and being all sanctimonious about their donation to charity or building another " Microsoft wing " at MIT .
Yeah , if I were that rich I 'd get a Tesla but the point is this sort of excess and the fun which goes along with it is the only real useful point to being rich that I can see .
Being a bitch , serving their own interests and bossing people around seems to be their normal mode of operation ; I 'd rather seem them out on the road enjoying themselves and leaving the rest of us to enjoy ourselves a bit more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the rich SHOULD blow their money on this type of insanity; much better than writing off that 2.1 million dollars (being picked up by you and the rest of this land's taxpayers in the form of offsetting their deduction) and being all sanctimonious about their donation to charity or building another "Microsoft wing" at MIT.
Yeah, if I were that rich I'd get a Tesla but the point is this sort of excess and the fun which goes along with it is the only real useful point to being rich that I can see.
Being a bitch, serving their own interests and bossing people around seems to be their normal mode of operation; I'd rather seem them out on the road enjoying themselves and leaving the rest of us to enjoy ourselves a bit more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598077</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246910820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In that case, by your childish have-not logic, you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler, then have your notebook stolen.</i></p><p>What's the about butt-hole dry-fucking?  Fantasy of yours?  Watching <i>The Notebook</i>, then getting butt-raped by a stranger.  That's a little...off, but okay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case , by your childish have-not logic , you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler , then have your notebook stolen.What 's the about butt-hole dry-fucking ?
Fantasy of yours ?
Watching The Notebook , then getting butt-raped by a stranger .
That 's a little...off , but okay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case, by your childish have-not logic, you deserve to be butt-hole dry-fucked by a night prowler, then have your notebook stolen.What's the about butt-hole dry-fucking?
Fantasy of yours?
Watching The Notebook, then getting butt-raped by a stranger.
That's a little...off, but okay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592483</id>
	<title>You don't own money</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246878840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Money is owned by the organisation which produces it. It is distributed with complex rules defining who can receive it and in what circumstances. Those rules are designed by people who already have money to ensure that the system favours them over those who do not already have it. Without money your access to the essentials of life will be severely limited.</p><p>Ability, hard work, and chance are all factors in the creation of personal wealth, but let's not forget the skewed set of rules which make it harder for the poor to accumulate money compared with the relative ease with which the already rich accumulate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Money is owned by the organisation which produces it .
It is distributed with complex rules defining who can receive it and in what circumstances .
Those rules are designed by people who already have money to ensure that the system favours them over those who do not already have it .
Without money your access to the essentials of life will be severely limited.Ability , hard work , and chance are all factors in the creation of personal wealth , but let 's not forget the skewed set of rules which make it harder for the poor to accumulate money compared with the relative ease with which the already rich accumulate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Money is owned by the organisation which produces it.
It is distributed with complex rules defining who can receive it and in what circumstances.
Those rules are designed by people who already have money to ensure that the system favours them over those who do not already have it.
Without money your access to the essentials of life will be severely limited.Ability, hard work, and chance are all factors in the creation of personal wealth, but let's not forget the skewed set of rules which make it harder for the poor to accumulate money compared with the relative ease with which the already rich accumulate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593599</id>
	<title>Re:It is not about the top speed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246890000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You, Sir, have a horizontally opposed 6 cylinder.  That's the beauty of the boxer engine in the 911; it needs no balance shaft due to horizontal piston opposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You , Sir , have a horizontally opposed 6 cylinder .
That 's the beauty of the boxer engine in the 911 ; it needs no balance shaft due to horizontal piston opposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, Sir, have a horizontally opposed 6 cylinder.
That's the beauty of the boxer engine in the 911; it needs no balance shaft due to horizontal piston opposition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592251</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1246875360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes gassing millions of people and keeping populations down by killing them in blitzkriegs is "green" as it cuts down CO2</p><p>how perverse...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes gassing millions of people and keeping populations down by killing them in blitzkriegs is " green " as it cuts down CO2how perverse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes gassing millions of people and keeping populations down by killing them in blitzkriegs is "green" as it cuts down CO2how perverse...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1246816500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It comes with Windows Mobile on the navigation system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591743</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>socsoc</author>
	<datestamp>1246910760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Informative? I had no idea what a Halo vehicle was (not a gamer) but I've heard of Bugatti for ages.  Perhaps it was PR to the folks who never leave their Xboxes except to check their twitter...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Informative ?
I had no idea what a Halo vehicle was ( not a gamer ) but I 've heard of Bugatti for ages .
Perhaps it was PR to the folks who never leave their Xboxes except to check their twitter.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Informative?
I had no idea what a Halo vehicle was (not a gamer) but I've heard of Bugatti for ages.
Perhaps it was PR to the folks who never leave their Xboxes except to check their twitter...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594839</id>
	<title>That is admittedly a very sexy looking car...</title>
	<author>Troy Baer</author>
	<datestamp>1246897260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but for $2.1M, it had better be the frickin' Batmobile.  Complete with Batman as the chauffeur.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but for $ 2.1M , it had better be the frickin ' Batmobile .
Complete with Batman as the chauffeur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but for $2.1M, it had better be the frickin' Batmobile.
Complete with Batman as the chauffeur.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593883</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>thesolo</author>
	<datestamp>1246891920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth's curvature!</p></div></blockquote><p>

For the record, Ehra-Lessien's main straight is exactly 9 kilometers in length.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth 's curvature !
For the record , Ehra-Lessien 's main straight is exactly 9 kilometers in length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth's curvature!
For the record, Ehra-Lessien's main straight is exactly 9 kilometers in length.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592275</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1246875720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It probably runs VxWorks from Wind River systems. A RTOS. It must have a lot of processors and as the price is not a concern, it must be high end (and shielded) PowerPC stuff, a lot of them.</p><p>Of course, I didn't hack the car<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Just guessing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably runs VxWorks from Wind River systems .
A RTOS .
It must have a lot of processors and as the price is not a concern , it must be high end ( and shielded ) PowerPC stuff , a lot of them.Of course , I did n't hack the car : ) Just guessing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably runs VxWorks from Wind River systems.
A RTOS.
It must have a lot of processors and as the price is not a concern, it must be high end (and shielded) PowerPC stuff, a lot of them.Of course, I didn't hack the car :) Just guessing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590941</id>
	<title>It's a dinosaur.</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1246815600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here are the critturs in the supercar world that will replace it:
<p> <i>
At the beginning of 2008 Pininfarina and Bollor&#195;&#169; set up a 50-50 joint venture with the goal of designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing an electric car with revolutionary technical features and formal qualities. The company considers the BLUECAR, to be not a mere concept car but a forerunner of the vehicle which will go into production in Italy at Pininfarina starting from 2010. Production on a commercial scale will take place between 2011 and 2017, with the forecasted output by 2015 being about 60,000 units.</i>
</p><p>
Link to <a href="http://www.greencarmagazine.net/2009/07/italian-ev-uses-ultracapacitor-technology-to-assist-energy-storage-and-retrievalbluecar/" title="greencarmagazine.net">Story.</a> [greencarmagazine.net]
</p><p>
RS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are the critturs in the supercar world that will replace it : At the beginning of 2008 Pininfarina and Bollor     set up a 50-50 joint venture with the goal of designing , developing , manufacturing and distributing an electric car with revolutionary technical features and formal qualities .
The company considers the BLUECAR , to be not a mere concept car but a forerunner of the vehicle which will go into production in Italy at Pininfarina starting from 2010 .
Production on a commercial scale will take place between 2011 and 2017 , with the forecasted output by 2015 being about 60,000 units .
Link to Story .
[ greencarmagazine.net ] RS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are the critturs in the supercar world that will replace it:
 
At the beginning of 2008 Pininfarina and BollorÃ© set up a 50-50 joint venture with the goal of designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing an electric car with revolutionary technical features and formal qualities.
The company considers the BLUECAR, to be not a mere concept car but a forerunner of the vehicle which will go into production in Italy at Pininfarina starting from 2010.
Production on a commercial scale will take place between 2011 and 2017, with the forecasted output by 2015 being about 60,000 units.
Link to Story.
[greencarmagazine.net]

RS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592261</id>
	<title>Re:It is not about the top speed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246875480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is all about acceleration.  The "older" Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h (62 mph) in approximately 2.46 seconds.  This is very near motorcycle speeds.  So while the high end might be very high, the low end is where most people drive the thing.</p><p>Putting it into perspective, my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood.  Fast enough for as heavy as it is, and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds.  I've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds.  Her car has a speed limiter, but I've never got to the point where it has come into play.  In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough.  With my car, I've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165+ range.</p><p>Love to take a lap or two in one of these....</p></div><p>C'mon. Now you made all us geeks drool and envious. How did you get one? Please could you tell us your secret. I'm sure there are thousands of geeks who only have a desktop background image of one, but a real wife!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is all about acceleration .
The " older " Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h ( 62 mph ) in approximately 2.46 seconds .
This is very near motorcycle speeds .
So while the high end might be very high , the low end is where most people drive the thing.Putting it into perspective , my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood .
Fast enough for as heavy as it is , and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds .
I 've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds .
Her car has a speed limiter , but I 've never got to the point where it has come into play .
In normal driving , that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough .
With my car , I 've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165 + range.Love to take a lap or two in one of these....C'mon .
Now you made all us geeks drool and envious .
How did you get one ?
Please could you tell us your secret .
I 'm sure there are thousands of geeks who only have a desktop background image of one , but a real wife !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is all about acceleration.
The "older" Bugatti Veyron reaching 100 km/h (62 mph) in approximately 2.46 seconds.
This is very near motorcycle speeds.
So while the high end might be very high, the low end is where most people drive the thing.Putting it into perspective, my wife drives an Audi S6 with the Lamborghini v10 under the hood.
Fast enough for as heavy as it is, and will do the same in about 5.2 seconds.
I've got a Porsche 911 C4 with a 300 horse V6 that does it in about 5.3 seconds.
Her car has a speed limiter, but I've never got to the point where it has come into play.
In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough.
With my car, I've never been on a track with a long enough strait line to even get up into the 165+ range.Love to take a lap or two in one of these....C'mon.
Now you made all us geeks drool and envious.
How did you get one?
Please could you tell us your secret.
I'm sure there are thousands of geeks who only have a desktop background image of one, but a real wife!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592137</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246873260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what planet are you, that you never heard of Bugatti before the Veyron? I knew them in the 80s, from making racing cars and there being vintage/veteran cars from Bugatti at shows and in some playing cards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what planet are you , that you never heard of Bugatti before the Veyron ?
I knew them in the 80s , from making racing cars and there being vintage/veteran cars from Bugatti at shows and in some playing cards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what planet are you, that you never heard of Bugatti before the Veyron?
I knew them in the 80s, from making racing cars and there being vintage/veteran cars from Bugatti at shows and in some playing cards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598677</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1246913580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>200mph is about 320kph. The car in the video took quite a while to even hit 300kph.<br><br>But I suppose it's not that silly to have a car with a 245mph top speed, if you just want to get to 160 or 200mph faster than the other cars on the road.</htmltext>
<tokenext>200mph is about 320kph .
The car in the video took quite a while to even hit 300kph.But I suppose it 's not that silly to have a car with a 245mph top speed , if you just want to get to 160 or 200mph faster than the other cars on the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>200mph is about 320kph.
The car in the video took quite a while to even hit 300kph.But I suppose it's not that silly to have a car with a 245mph top speed, if you just want to get to 160 or 200mph faster than the other cars on the road.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593347</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1246888440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why? The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering. Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall. The workmanship is astounding.</p></div><p>They sell it at a loss because they love you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering .
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall .
The workmanship is astounding.They sell it at a loss because they love you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering.
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall.
The workmanship is astounding.They sell it at a loss because they love you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953</id>
	<title>"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1246815720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.  Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , like they gon na sell millions of these .
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself , eh , monkey boy ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, like they gonna sell millions of these.
Keep your commie green cool aid to yourself, eh, monkey boy?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591617</id>
	<title>WTF were they thinking?</title>
	<author>RoboRay</author>
	<datestamp>1246822740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No cup holder?  I'll pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No cup holder ?
I 'll pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No cup holder?
I'll pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592193</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1246874340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boy would you be pissed seeing a blue screen after you signed over 2.1 big bobs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boy would you be pissed seeing a blue screen after you signed over 2.1 big bobs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boy would you be pissed seeing a blue screen after you signed over 2.1 big bobs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596499</id>
	<title>Re:I did the top speed in an S4..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246904280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Final notes for wannabees: I have had extensive high speed training. Don't try this stuff unless you're (a) stone sober and in top physical condition, (b) are 100\% sure of the condition and capabilities of your car (and even then), (c) on location where such speeds are legal and (d) can do so without causing any risk to other road users (on circuit is even better) - and that's after doing some test runs.<br>And (d) an arrogant douchebag with an overwhelming desire to be a menace to the public<br>And (e) have a very small penis</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Final notes for wannabees : I have had extensive high speed training .
Do n't try this stuff unless you 're ( a ) stone sober and in top physical condition , ( b ) are 100 \ % sure of the condition and capabilities of your car ( and even then ) , ( c ) on location where such speeds are legal and ( d ) can do so without causing any risk to other road users ( on circuit is even better ) - and that 's after doing some test runs.And ( d ) an arrogant douchebag with an overwhelming desire to be a menace to the publicAnd ( e ) have a very small penis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Final notes for wannabees: I have had extensive high speed training.
Don't try this stuff unless you're (a) stone sober and in top physical condition, (b) are 100\% sure of the condition and capabilities of your car (and even then), (c) on location where such speeds are legal and (d) can do so without causing any risk to other road users (on circuit is even better) - and that's after doing some test runs.And (d) an arrogant douchebag with an overwhelming desire to be a menace to the publicAnd (e) have a very small penis</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593777</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246891260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, does a BSOD equal it suddenly veers into the first large obsticle it can find?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , does a BSOD equal it suddenly veers into the first large obsticle it can find ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, does a BSOD equal it suddenly veers into the first large obsticle it can find?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591417</id>
	<title>story trashcan ?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1246820160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was this from the archives? There've been videos of the car in action, reports from TV car shows, websites and a whole bunch of other stuff for well over a year <b>at least</b>. And none of them said it's a prototype or something.</p><p>We're all used to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. being occasionally "out of touch" with reality a little, but this is "olds", not "news", and 5 seconds with Google would've told the editors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was this from the archives ?
There 've been videos of the car in action , reports from TV car shows , websites and a whole bunch of other stuff for well over a year at least .
And none of them said it 's a prototype or something.We 're all used to / .
being occasionally " out of touch " with reality a little , but this is " olds " , not " news " , and 5 seconds with Google would 've told the editors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was this from the archives?
There've been videos of the car in action, reports from TV car shows, websites and a whole bunch of other stuff for well over a year at least.
And none of them said it's a prototype or something.We're all used to /.
being occasionally "out of touch" with reality a little, but this is "olds", not "news", and 5 seconds with Google would've told the editors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591699</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246823760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if fairness, the person who crashed the Enzo was the owners son who wasn't experienced in driving a powerful car without driver aids...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if fairness , the person who crashed the Enzo was the owners son who was n't experienced in driving a powerful car without driver aids.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if fairness, the person who crashed the Enzo was the owners son who wasn't experienced in driving a powerful car without driver aids...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595013</id>
	<title>Re:Play on player</title>
	<author>dfenstrate</author>
	<datestamp>1246898040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example. But having accepted it as an adult, the world is not fair, I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity. If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to "fluff" then so be it. We should be encouraging them every chance we can.</i></p><p>Exactly. This car was not designed and built by other multi-millionaires for fun. Legions of middle class engineers and assembly line workers made a good living putting this, and every other rich-boy toy together. They took that money home, fed their family, sent their kids to college, and put some cash away for retirement.</p><p>Conspicuous consumption like this is fantastic for all the people who make the products that are conspicuously consumed, and the vast majority of them are ordinary fellows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor , pointing to this type of excess as an example .
But having accepted it as an adult , the world is not fair , I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity .
If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to " fluff " then so be it .
We should be encouraging them every chance we can.Exactly .
This car was not designed and built by other multi-millionaires for fun .
Legions of middle class engineers and assembly line workers made a good living putting this , and every other rich-boy toy together .
They took that money home , fed their family , sent their kids to college , and put some cash away for retirement.Conspicuous consumption like this is fantastic for all the people who make the products that are conspicuously consumed , and the vast majority of them are ordinary fellows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a younger man I used to get very upset about the gap between rich and poor, pointing to this type of excess as an example.
But having accepted it as an adult, the world is not fair, I actually enjoy seeing this kind of insanity.
If the rich want to blow their money on what amounts to "fluff" then so be it.
We should be encouraging them every chance we can.Exactly.
This car was not designed and built by other multi-millionaires for fun.
Legions of middle class engineers and assembly line workers made a good living putting this, and every other rich-boy toy together.
They took that money home, fed their family, sent their kids to college, and put some cash away for retirement.Conspicuous consumption like this is fantastic for all the people who make the products that are conspicuously consumed, and the vast majority of them are ordinary fellows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591523</id>
	<title>srsly</title>
	<author>peas\_n\_carrots</author>
	<datestamp>1246821420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. and people complain about the range of EVs.  This gets what, 5 mpg?  A 20 gal tank, which would be huge for a small sports car, would net 100 mi.  Blech</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. and people complain about the range of EVs .
This gets what , 5 mpg ?
A 20 gal tank , which would be huge for a small sports car , would net 100 mi .
Blech</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. and people complain about the range of EVs.
This gets what, 5 mpg?
A 20 gal tank, which would be huge for a small sports car, would net 100 mi.
Blech</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592637</id>
	<title>Missing the Pont</title>
	<author>clickclickdrone</author>
	<datestamp>1246881600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As Top Gear pointed out, yes it is insanely expensive, insanely fast and insanely high tech. However, with oil prices and availability going the way it is, plus increased green awareness, the Veyron probably represents the pinnacle that petrol based cars will ever achieve. This is it. <br>
They are also all sold at a considerable loss - they cost much more to build than they sell for. It's a final swansong excercise in ultimate car technology. Sure, they'll be cool and funky stuff along later but for this sort of vehicle, it's the top dog. As such, I admire it as an excercise is engineering and beauty.<br>
However, it is also (to my mind) an obscene way to spend your money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As Top Gear pointed out , yes it is insanely expensive , insanely fast and insanely high tech .
However , with oil prices and availability going the way it is , plus increased green awareness , the Veyron probably represents the pinnacle that petrol based cars will ever achieve .
This is it .
They are also all sold at a considerable loss - they cost much more to build than they sell for .
It 's a final swansong excercise in ultimate car technology .
Sure , they 'll be cool and funky stuff along later but for this sort of vehicle , it 's the top dog .
As such , I admire it as an excercise is engineering and beauty .
However , it is also ( to my mind ) an obscene way to spend your money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Top Gear pointed out, yes it is insanely expensive, insanely fast and insanely high tech.
However, with oil prices and availability going the way it is, plus increased green awareness, the Veyron probably represents the pinnacle that petrol based cars will ever achieve.
This is it.
They are also all sold at a considerable loss - they cost much more to build than they sell for.
It's a final swansong excercise in ultimate car technology.
Sure, they'll be cool and funky stuff along later but for this sort of vehicle, it's the top dog.
As such, I admire it as an excercise is engineering and beauty.
However, it is also (to my mind) an obscene way to spend your money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594073</id>
	<title>Re:"Guilty conscience"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246892880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Cue Godwin!</p></div><p>FWIW, Godwins law dosn't apply when you actually mention it.<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin\%27s\_law</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cue Godwin ! FWIW , Godwins law dos n't apply when you actually mention it.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin \ % 27s \ _law</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Cue Godwin!FWIW, Godwins law dosn't apply when you actually mention it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin\%27s\_law
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28604053</id>
	<title>THE Veyron</title>
	<author>TheRedheadRiter</author>
	<datestamp>1246902420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just wanted to say as a woman that I can't afford that car, I don't know how all the parts work, but it is by far THE HOTTEST CAR ON THE PLANET and I don't are about all the rest of the stuff.  It is sleek, sexy, fast, and oozes "rich" all over the place.  The lines are so smooooooth and I just love, love, love, love the Veyron.  I have it as my screensaver at work and I update it every time they update the car.  It is yummy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wanted to say as a woman that I ca n't afford that car , I do n't know how all the parts work , but it is by far THE HOTTEST CAR ON THE PLANET and I do n't are about all the rest of the stuff .
It is sleek , sexy , fast , and oozes " rich " all over the place .
The lines are so smooooooth and I just love , love , love , love the Veyron .
I have it as my screensaver at work and I update it every time they update the car .
It is yummy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wanted to say as a woman that I can't afford that car, I don't know how all the parts work, but it is by far THE HOTTEST CAR ON THE PLANET and I don't are about all the rest of the stuff.
It is sleek, sexy, fast, and oozes "rich" all over the place.
The lines are so smooooooth and I just love, love, love, love the Veyron.
I have it as my screensaver at work and I update it every time they update the car.
It is yummy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591799</id>
	<title>Re:In real units...</title>
	<author>Lex-Man82</author>
	<datestamp>1246911900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be fair anyone buying this car is just going to sit it in a showroom so it's not really going to be using it's 1000 horsepower a lot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair anyone buying this car is just going to sit it in a showroom so it 's not really going to be using it 's 1000 horsepower a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair anyone buying this car is just going to sit it in a showroom so it's not really going to be using it's 1000 horsepower a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593783</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246891320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think there is one time keying cars is OK. When the ahole driving it comes close enough to hit the pedestrian in the crosswalk for said pedestrian to key the car<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think there is one time keying cars is OK. When the ahole driving it comes close enough to hit the pedestrian in the crosswalk for said pedestrian to key the car .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think there is one time keying cars is OK. When the ahole driving it comes close enough to hit the pedestrian in the crosswalk for said pedestrian to key the car ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592555</id>
	<title>Re:Hell No, I guess</title>
	<author>rsunny</author>
	<datestamp>1246880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mount those 1 Us on a SSC Ultimate Aero , you got yourself the fastest datacenter.

413&gt; 407</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mount those 1 Us on a SSC Ultimate Aero , you got yourself the fastest datacenter .
413 &gt; 407</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mount those 1 Us on a SSC Ultimate Aero , you got yourself the fastest datacenter.
413&gt; 407</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594439</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>JoeMerchant</author>
	<datestamp>1246895160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.</p><p>Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.  Wired used to be something to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/read/.</p><p>Now?  We have this.  A fluff advertisement column, but not only that, nothing about the tech end at all.  Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it's a fast car and costs a lot of money.  It's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary.  Wired has become Maxim, but without the girls.</p><p>--
BMO</p></div><p>It's most certainly not advertisement, it's more of an excuse to practice some "Gonzo journalism" writing.  I remember a similar column by P.J. o'Rorque in Rolling Stone a few years back about a mere $220K Lambo....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.Wired used to be cool and had decent writers .
Wired used to be something to /read/.Now ?
We have this .
A fluff advertisement column , but not only that , nothing about the tech end at all .
Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it 's a fast car and costs a lot of money .
It 's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary .
Wired has become Maxim , but without the girls.-- BMOIt 's most certainly not advertisement , it 's more of an excuse to practice some " Gonzo journalism " writing .
I remember a similar column by P.J .
o'Rorque in Rolling Stone a few years back about a mere $ 220K Lambo... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The days are certainly gone when Wired used to have people like Neal Stephenson write for them.Wired used to be cool and had decent writers.
Wired used to be something to /read/.Now?
We have this.
A fluff advertisement column, but not only that, nothing about the tech end at all.
Nothing about the engineering or anything really interesting except that it's a fast car and costs a lot of money.
It's also written in the style of a high-school newspaper or Slashdot summary.
Wired has become Maxim, but without the girls.--
BMOIt's most certainly not advertisement, it's more of an excuse to practice some "Gonzo journalism" writing.
I remember a similar column by P.J.
o'Rorque in Rolling Stone a few years back about a mere $220K Lambo....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596525</id>
	<title>Re:Article Quality and Wired</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1246904340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, I've been reading Wired since the 90s and I couldn't disagree more. There was a period in the early 00s when Wired went though a period of bad quality, but in the last two-three years they've really recaptured the quality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , I 've been reading Wired since the 90s and I could n't disagree more .
There was a period in the early 00s when Wired went though a period of bad quality , but in the last two-three years they 've really recaptured the quality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, I've been reading Wired since the 90s and I couldn't disagree more.
There was a period in the early 00s when Wired went though a period of bad quality, but in the last two-three years they've really recaptured the quality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591943</id>
	<title>Re:Bugatti Veyron = 27 MP3's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246870860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More like +5 Sad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More like + 5 Sad : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like +5 Sad :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592141</id>
	<title>Art</title>
	<author>heson</author>
	<datestamp>1246873260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is an engineering/art masterpiece. Some like to own those, others like me are happy enough watching them at a museum or on Top Gear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an engineering/art masterpiece .
Some like to own those , others like me are happy enough watching them at a museum or on Top Gear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an engineering/art masterpiece.
Some like to own those, others like me are happy enough watching them at a museum or on Top Gear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591531</id>
	<title>Removable roof</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246821720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read an article where they pointed out the removable roof. There's no room for storing the it in the trunk, so if it happens to rain when you've left it at home, their solution is a rectangluar umbrella that clips over the space over your head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read an article where they pointed out the removable roof .
There 's no room for storing the it in the trunk , so if it happens to rain when you 've left it at home , their solution is a rectangluar umbrella that clips over the space over your head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read an article where they pointed out the removable roof.
There's no room for storing the it in the trunk, so if it happens to rain when you've left it at home, their solution is a rectangluar umbrella that clips over the space over your head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591199</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246817880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think someone's a more than a bit jealous...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think someone 's a more than a bit jealous.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think someone's a more than a bit jealous...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591967</id>
	<title>ugly much</title>
	<author>luigi517</author>
	<datestamp>1246871160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that is the ugliest 2.1 million dollars I have ever seen</htmltext>
<tokenext>that is the ugliest 2.1 million dollars I have ever seen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that is the ugliest 2.1 million dollars I have ever seen</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594377</id>
	<title>Re:I did the top speed in an S4..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246894800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>B7 S4s aren't very fast, and top speed runs don't require "extensive high speed training". The only requirements are that you aren't a jacktard and you push the throttle all the way down for a long time.</p><p>Spouting out false rhetoric as though you were the grand vizier only shows you know next to nothing about automobiles.</p><p>You see, I've gone that fast on road which has chicanes, sweepers, and elevation changes. (It also had rub strips and looped around into itself.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>B7 S4s are n't very fast , and top speed runs do n't require " extensive high speed training " .
The only requirements are that you are n't a jacktard and you push the throttle all the way down for a long time.Spouting out false rhetoric as though you were the grand vizier only shows you know next to nothing about automobiles.You see , I 've gone that fast on road which has chicanes , sweepers , and elevation changes .
( It also had rub strips and looped around into itself .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>B7 S4s aren't very fast, and top speed runs don't require "extensive high speed training".
The only requirements are that you aren't a jacktard and you push the throttle all the way down for a long time.Spouting out false rhetoric as though you were the grand vizier only shows you know next to nothing about automobiles.You see, I've gone that fast on road which has chicanes, sweepers, and elevation changes.
(It also had rub strips and looped around into itself.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28674399</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247488800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Another show mentioned how fragile they are. When they are featured on a show or test track, supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there. Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away.</p></div></blockquote><p>Perhaps you missed the Top Gear episode where Jeremy drove the Veyron in a race from Italy to London?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another show mentioned how fragile they are .
When they are featured on a show or test track , supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there .
Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away.Perhaps you missed the Top Gear episode where Jeremy drove the Veyron in a race from Italy to London ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another show mentioned how fragile they are.
When they are featured on a show or test track, supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there.
Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away.Perhaps you missed the Top Gear episode where Jeremy drove the Veyron in a race from Italy to London?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591897</id>
	<title>Too much hyperbole</title>
	<author>dalesc</author>
	<datestamp>1246913400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may be extreme and excessive in some departments but not all as the author would like you to believe. That sort of acceleration has been commonplace on sports motorbikes for years and my eyeballs haven't deformed yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be extreme and excessive in some departments but not all as the author would like you to believe .
That sort of acceleration has been commonplace on sports motorbikes for years and my eyeballs have n't deformed yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be extreme and excessive in some departments but not all as the author would like you to believe.
That sort of acceleration has been commonplace on sports motorbikes for years and my eyeballs haven't deformed yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246817640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds. You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly. About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.</p><p>I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth's curvature!</p><p>A guy tried driving a super-Ferrari (an Enzo, I think) like that here in Southern California a few years back. yeah, You guessed it. Mr. Supercar? Meet Mr. Telephone Pole. Sadly, the dumbass driving it survived.</p><p>Another show mentioned how fragile they are. When they are featured on a show or test track, supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there. Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it , or any 200 + MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds .
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds , but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly .
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed * is * a test track with an enormous straight.I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth 's curvature ! A guy tried driving a super-Ferrari ( an Enzo , I think ) like that here in Southern California a few years back .
yeah , You guessed it .
Mr. Supercar ?
Meet Mr. Telephone Pole .
Sadly , the dumbass driving it survived.Another show mentioned how fragile they are .
When they are featured on a show or test track , supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there .
Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also demonstrated the silliest thing about it, or any 200+ MPH car... It takes quite a while to get to those speeds.
You may get 0-60 in 3 seconds, but the acceleration drops off rather rapidly.
About the only place you can get a car like that up to speed *is* a test track with an enormous straight.I think it must have been 8 miles or more because they commented that the far end was out of sight due to the Earth's curvature!A guy tried driving a super-Ferrari (an Enzo, I think) like that here in Southern California a few years back.
yeah, You guessed it.
Mr. Supercar?
Meet Mr. Telephone Pole.
Sadly, the dumbass driving it survived.Another show mentioned how fragile they are.
When they are featured on a show or test track, supercar makers box them up like ancient relics and ship them there.
Contrast to the episode with the McClaren SLK that was simply driven to the filming site from two countries away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591579</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246822200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And exactly how would you go about breaking someone's legs? Pasty, frail, cheetos power?</p><p>Here's some free advice: Shut the fuck up, nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And exactly how would you go about breaking someone 's legs ?
Pasty , frail , cheetos power ? Here 's some free advice : Shut the fuck up , nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And exactly how would you go about breaking someone's legs?
Pasty, frail, cheetos power?Here's some free advice: Shut the fuck up, nerd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592099</id>
	<title>Re:WTF were they thinking?</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1246872720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>No cup holder? I'll pass.</i></p><p>They likely looked at the kind of engineering problems a cup holder would present and decided it was too hard.</p><p>Think about it: 0-60 in 2.5 seconds == 10.72m/s^2.  This car accelerates at \_over 1G\_.  The cup holder would have to automatically swivel through 45 degrees to prevent it spilling your drink when you put your foot to the floor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No cup holder ?
I 'll pass.They likely looked at the kind of engineering problems a cup holder would present and decided it was too hard.Think about it : 0-60 in 2.5 seconds = = 10.72m/s ^ 2 .
This car accelerates at \ _over 1G \ _ .
The cup holder would have to automatically swivel through 45 degrees to prevent it spilling your drink when you put your foot to the floor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No cup holder?
I'll pass.They likely looked at the kind of engineering problems a cup holder would present and decided it was too hard.Think about it: 0-60 in 2.5 seconds == 10.72m/s^2.
This car accelerates at \_over 1G\_.
The cup holder would have to automatically swivel through 45 degrees to prevent it spilling your drink when you put your foot to the floor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595787</id>
	<title>There is larger conspicuous consumption every day</title>
	<author>rbrander</author>
	<datestamp>1246901460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I missed something surfing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. at 4, but everybody is arguing about the waste, the excess, the carbon, whatever - because its a CAR.   There are thousands of private jets out there and few cost as *little* as $2.1M or use as little fuel.</p><p>Somebody buying one of these instead of a $5M on a new Gulfstream II they could also afford, is arguably being abstemious - and much more considerate of the environment.</p><p>And lets not get started on homes (on private islands or not); or even mention paying $37M for a painting.</p><p>Bottom line: it's not how excessive a purchase seems given what you are getting - it's just absolutely how much you are spending that makes it "consumption".</p><p>$2.1M would be very, very cheap for an M-1 tank - but getting an M-1 to pop down to the A&amp;P in would still count as pretty conspicuous consumption.</p><p>This is great news for the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. crowd, most of whom have computers overpowered for their actual needs by a much, much larger margin than the 245 MPG Bugatti is overpowered for a trip to the A&amp;P.  Fortunately for them, their absolute expenditure was minor, so they aren't a bunch of contemptible jerks showing off and compensating for penis size.</p><p>Well, they might be, of course, but not for THAT reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I missed something surfing / .
at 4 , but everybody is arguing about the waste , the excess , the carbon , whatever - because its a CAR .
There are thousands of private jets out there and few cost as * little * as $ 2.1M or use as little fuel.Somebody buying one of these instead of a $ 5M on a new Gulfstream II they could also afford , is arguably being abstemious - and much more considerate of the environment.And lets not get started on homes ( on private islands or not ) ; or even mention paying $ 37M for a painting.Bottom line : it 's not how excessive a purchase seems given what you are getting - it 's just absolutely how much you are spending that makes it " consumption " . $ 2.1M would be very , very cheap for an M-1 tank - but getting an M-1 to pop down to the A&amp;P in would still count as pretty conspicuous consumption.This is great news for the / .
crowd , most of whom have computers overpowered for their actual needs by a much , much larger margin than the 245 MPG Bugatti is overpowered for a trip to the A&amp;P .
Fortunately for them , their absolute expenditure was minor , so they are n't a bunch of contemptible jerks showing off and compensating for penis size.Well , they might be , of course , but not for THAT reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I missed something surfing /.
at 4, but everybody is arguing about the waste, the excess, the carbon, whatever - because its a CAR.
There are thousands of private jets out there and few cost as *little* as $2.1M or use as little fuel.Somebody buying one of these instead of a $5M on a new Gulfstream II they could also afford, is arguably being abstemious - and much more considerate of the environment.And lets not get started on homes (on private islands or not); or even mention paying $37M for a painting.Bottom line: it's not how excessive a purchase seems given what you are getting - it's just absolutely how much you are spending that makes it "consumption".$2.1M would be very, very cheap for an M-1 tank - but getting an M-1 to pop down to the A&amp;P in would still count as pretty conspicuous consumption.This is great news for the /.
crowd, most of whom have computers overpowered for their actual needs by a much, much larger margin than the 245 MPG Bugatti is overpowered for a trip to the A&amp;P.
Fortunately for them, their absolute expenditure was minor, so they aren't a bunch of contemptible jerks showing off and compensating for penis size.Well, they might be, of course, but not for THAT reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593471</id>
	<title>2008 SSC Ultimate Aero</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246889340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe no one has mentioned this car (at least that I saw). Give this a look, it is not only faster it costs a lot less.</p><p><a href="http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video\_player.shtml?vid=275184" title="jaylenosgarage.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video\_player.shtml?vid=275184</a> [jaylenosgarage.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe no one has mentioned this car ( at least that I saw ) .
Give this a look , it is not only faster it costs a lot less.http : //www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video \ _player.shtml ? vid = 275184 [ jaylenosgarage.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe no one has mentioned this car (at least that I saw).
Give this a look, it is not only faster it costs a lot less.http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/video/video\_player.shtml?vid=275184 [jaylenosgarage.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945</id>
	<title>Re:If I ever see..</title>
	<author>Goldberg's Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1246815660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why? The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering. Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall. The workmanship is astounding.</p><p>I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs. People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY assholes.</p><p>But then you're too big of a pussy to post with your real account, so clearly you ARE an asshole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering .
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall .
The workmanship is astounding.I ever caught you keying ANY car , I 'd break your fucking legs .
People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY assholes.But then you 're too big of a pussy to post with your real account , so clearly you ARE an asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
The Veyron is an incredible piece of engineering.
Bugatti sell them at a LOSS if I recall.
The workmanship is astounding.I ever caught you keying ANY car, I'd break your fucking legs.
People who key cars are UNIVERSALLY assholes.But then you're too big of a pussy to post with your real account, so clearly you ARE an asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596567</id>
	<title>Re:Top Gear Veyron goodness</title>
	<author>JAlexoi</author>
	<datestamp>1246904520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well... TopGear did do an episode where they transported a white truffle from Northern Italy to London it was Veyron against a light airplane and a train.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... TopGear did do an episode where they transported a white truffle from Northern Italy to London it was Veyron against a light airplane and a train .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... TopGear did do an episode where they transported a white truffle from Northern Italy to London it was Veyron against a light airplane and a train.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593313</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but....</title>
	<author>EminNew</author>
	<datestamp>1246888140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I think Bugatti (or WV) loses money on each Veyron as it costs more than 2.1 million to make. It's a matter of prestige.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think Bugatti ( or WV ) loses money on each Veyron as it costs more than 2.1 million to make .
It 's a matter of prestige .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think Bugatti (or WV) loses money on each Veyron as it costs more than 2.1 million to make.
It's a matter of prestige.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592127</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246873080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those who buy a Veyron, don't care about its price tag, or the fact that it would pay for so-many-more Ferraris, Mercedes or other "commoner" crap. End of story. Let them enjoy their toys and go back to your Nissan Micras. Now, please, move along. Nothing to see here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those who buy a Veyron , do n't care about its price tag , or the fact that it would pay for so-many-more Ferraris , Mercedes or other " commoner " crap .
End of story .
Let them enjoy their toys and go back to your Nissan Micras .
Now , please , move along .
Nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those who buy a Veyron, don't care about its price tag, or the fact that it would pay for so-many-more Ferraris, Mercedes or other "commoner" crap.
End of story.
Let them enjoy their toys and go back to your Nissan Micras.
Now, please, move along.
Nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594065</id>
	<title>Can't get a 2010 Camaro to top speed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246892760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least not yet, see above -- not many places to try and my own condition.</p><p>Not all this engineering is going to waste on any of these hyper fast cars.<br>The Camaro gets over 20 mpg on twisty mountain roads, with a fairly lead foot.<br>I'll have to take it on a long trip to see if I can get the advertised 25, which I probably can, as I generally exceed the ratings on other cars when driven carefully.</p><p>Think of what would happen if you got rid of half the weight and 2/3 of the engine.<br>You'd have a 50+ mpg car that would still be an outrageous hot rod.  The Camaro (SS of course) with ~450hp is essentially a formula car with license plates.  Mine got super tuned at GM performance center on it's way to me, and the HP is very approximate, but it's WAY up there.</p><p>And despite what people say, GM *is* building a car people want, if I judge merely by the appreciative crowds it draws every time I stop.</p><p>Back in the day, when I was a pro racer, we used to bench race on what would be the perfect street car.  Here it is, finally, right down to the compression and cam timing.  Those 275x20 Pirelli's and huge disk brakes are kind of nice...and required, the car is traction limited in the first few gears even so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least not yet , see above -- not many places to try and my own condition.Not all this engineering is going to waste on any of these hyper fast cars.The Camaro gets over 20 mpg on twisty mountain roads , with a fairly lead foot.I 'll have to take it on a long trip to see if I can get the advertised 25 , which I probably can , as I generally exceed the ratings on other cars when driven carefully.Think of what would happen if you got rid of half the weight and 2/3 of the engine.You 'd have a 50 + mpg car that would still be an outrageous hot rod .
The Camaro ( SS of course ) with ~ 450hp is essentially a formula car with license plates .
Mine got super tuned at GM performance center on it 's way to me , and the HP is very approximate , but it 's WAY up there.And despite what people say , GM * is * building a car people want , if I judge merely by the appreciative crowds it draws every time I stop.Back in the day , when I was a pro racer , we used to bench race on what would be the perfect street car .
Here it is , finally , right down to the compression and cam timing .
Those 275x20 Pirelli 's and huge disk brakes are kind of nice...and required , the car is traction limited in the first few gears even so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least not yet, see above -- not many places to try and my own condition.Not all this engineering is going to waste on any of these hyper fast cars.The Camaro gets over 20 mpg on twisty mountain roads, with a fairly lead foot.I'll have to take it on a long trip to see if I can get the advertised 25, which I probably can, as I generally exceed the ratings on other cars when driven carefully.Think of what would happen if you got rid of half the weight and 2/3 of the engine.You'd have a 50+ mpg car that would still be an outrageous hot rod.
The Camaro (SS of course) with ~450hp is essentially a formula car with license plates.
Mine got super tuned at GM performance center on it's way to me, and the HP is very approximate, but it's WAY up there.And despite what people say, GM *is* building a car people want, if I judge merely by the appreciative crowds it draws every time I stop.Back in the day, when I was a pro racer, we used to bench race on what would be the perfect street car.
Here it is, finally, right down to the compression and cam timing.
Those 275x20 Pirelli's and huge disk brakes are kind of nice...and required, the car is traction limited in the first few gears even so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595969</id>
	<title>Re:It is not about the top speed...</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1246902180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough. </i>
</p><p>Not if you're a good driver.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In normal driving , that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough .
Not if you 're a good driver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> In normal driving, that sort of acceleration can be handy and is used often enough.
Not if you're a good driver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591763</id>
	<title>Re:It's the ultimate halo car</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1246911060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.</p></div><p>The Bugatti brand has historically been known for exclusive and mostly very high performance automobiles in relatively the same market as other boutique Italian manufacturers such as Ferrari and Lamborghini or the British Aston Martin. The halo effect is well known in mass market brands, but Bugatti and other boutiques like it are NOT mass market brands and cannot be made into mass market brands without losing their boutique pedigree and exclusivity. I would be surprised if Volkswagen attempted to mass market the Bugatti name by producing luxury cars which compete for an entirely different market than supercars. The Mercedes "S-Class" buyer or perhaps the Rolls Royce or Bentley in the really high end is not looking for a supercar, but rather a smooth ride with the most luxurious features and the highest possible quality construction. They generally want a large sedan-like car, not a formula-one racer with leather seats.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a ( obviously lower ) luxury market very soon , cashing in on the recognition they 've earned.The Bugatti brand has historically been known for exclusive and mostly very high performance automobiles in relatively the same market as other boutique Italian manufacturers such as Ferrari and Lamborghini or the British Aston Martin .
The halo effect is well known in mass market brands , but Bugatti and other boutiques like it are NOT mass market brands and can not be made into mass market brands without losing their boutique pedigree and exclusivity .
I would be surprised if Volkswagen attempted to mass market the Bugatti name by producing luxury cars which compete for an entirely different market than supercars .
The Mercedes " S-Class " buyer or perhaps the Rolls Royce or Bentley in the really high end is not looking for a supercar , but rather a smooth ride with the most luxurious features and the highest possible quality construction .
They generally want a large sedan-like car , not a formula-one racer with leather seats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't surprise me if Bugatti make a big move into a (obviously lower) luxury market very soon, cashing in on the recognition they've earned.The Bugatti brand has historically been known for exclusive and mostly very high performance automobiles in relatively the same market as other boutique Italian manufacturers such as Ferrari and Lamborghini or the British Aston Martin.
The halo effect is well known in mass market brands, but Bugatti and other boutiques like it are NOT mass market brands and cannot be made into mass market brands without losing their boutique pedigree and exclusivity.
I would be surprised if Volkswagen attempted to mass market the Bugatti name by producing luxury cars which compete for an entirely different market than supercars.
The Mercedes "S-Class" buyer or perhaps the Rolls Royce or Bentley in the really high end is not looking for a supercar, but rather a smooth ride with the most luxurious features and the highest possible quality construction.
They generally want a large sedan-like car, not a formula-one racer with leather seats.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591235</id>
	<title>Aston Martin</title>
	<author>deepGem</author>
	<datestamp>1246818360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess the Aston Martin "one-77" has some competition now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the Aston Martin " one-77 " has some competition now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the Aston Martin "one-77" has some competition now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595207</id>
	<title>Re:I want two</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246898880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.</p></div><p>Not when the left lane is clogged up with landscapers pickup trucks dragging lawnmowers and little old ladies in Volvos.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.Not when the left lane is clogged up with landscapers pickup trucks dragging lawnmowers and little old ladies in Volvos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I got to the point that it could out fly helicopters.... hoo boy.Not when the left lane is clogged up with landscapers pickup trucks dragging lawnmowers and little old ladies in Volvos.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598111</id>
	<title>Re:Veyron? Meh.</title>
	<author>hibiki\_r</author>
	<datestamp>1246911000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Racing bikes can handle well enough:Let's look at a track with a decent turn/straight mix, like Laguna Seca. A motogp bike can do 1'23 around the track. That's a bit faster than what a Porche 911 GT3 does on the same track. The bikes take the corners a bit slower, but they are comparable over a race distance.</p><p>The MX-5 might be as cheap as roadsters get, but it's no slouch on a curvy road. Plenty of cars with a lot more power will do worse on a track with only very short straights. You have to spend a lot more dough to find a car that is much better than it is for Autocross.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Racing bikes can handle well enough : Let 's look at a track with a decent turn/straight mix , like Laguna Seca .
A motogp bike can do 1'23 around the track .
That 's a bit faster than what a Porche 911 GT3 does on the same track .
The bikes take the corners a bit slower , but they are comparable over a race distance.The MX-5 might be as cheap as roadsters get , but it 's no slouch on a curvy road .
Plenty of cars with a lot more power will do worse on a track with only very short straights .
You have to spend a lot more dough to find a car that is much better than it is for Autocross .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Racing bikes can handle well enough:Let's look at a track with a decent turn/straight mix, like Laguna Seca.
A motogp bike can do 1'23 around the track.
That's a bit faster than what a Porche 911 GT3 does on the same track.
The bikes take the corners a bit slower, but they are comparable over a race distance.The MX-5 might be as cheap as roadsters get, but it's no slouch on a curvy road.
Plenty of cars with a lot more power will do worse on a track with only very short straights.
You have to spend a lot more dough to find a car that is much better than it is for Autocross.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28674399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592101
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_05_2122237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592161
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590945
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591267
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591343
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594615
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593783
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591543
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593777
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592325
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592959
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593313
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599075
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591871
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591707
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598111
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598403
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591035
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592531
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591721
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28601719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595207
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592765
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592555
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591171
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591699
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28674399
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594785
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593691
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595541
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593883
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592253
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28598677
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28599117
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591663
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28595969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591641
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28596499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592169
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594377
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_05_2122237.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28590939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28593273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28594449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28592879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_05_2122237.28591743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
