<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_04_169220</id>
	<title>AOL Shuts Down CompuServe</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246727280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://psoug.org/" rel="nofollow">Oracle Goddess</a> writes <i>"After 30 years, CompuServe is all but dead, as <a href="http://www.basexblog.com/2009/07/03/compuserve-requiem/">AOL has pulled the plug on the once-great company</a>. The original CompuServe service, first offered in 1979, <a href="http://paperpc.blogspot.com/2009/06/compuserve-classic-so-long-old-friend.html">provided its users with addresses such as 73402,3633</a> and was the first major online service. CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic (as the service was renamed) addresses at no charge via a new e-mail system, but the software that the service was built on has been shut down. Tellingly, the current version of the service's client software, CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2, dates back to 1999."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oracle Goddess writes " After 30 years , CompuServe is all but dead , as AOL has pulled the plug on the once-great company .
The original CompuServe service , first offered in 1979 , provided its users with addresses such as 73402,3633 and was the first major online service .
CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic ( as the service was renamed ) addresses at no charge via a new e-mail system , but the software that the service was built on has been shut down .
Tellingly , the current version of the service 's client software , CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2 , dates back to 1999 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oracle Goddess writes "After 30 years, CompuServe is all but dead, as AOL has pulled the plug on the once-great company.
The original CompuServe service, first offered in 1979, provided its users with addresses such as 73402,3633 and was the first major online service.
CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic (as the service was renamed) addresses at no charge via a new e-mail system, but the software that the service was built on has been shut down.
Tellingly, the current version of the service's client software, CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2, dates back to 1999.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583857</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>sgant</author>
	<datestamp>1246719420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the time we went over to Shelbyville during the war, I wore an onion on my belt....which was the style at the time...you couldn't get those white ones, you could only get those big yellow ones.................now where was I........oh yeah, the important thing was I was wearing an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time, you couldn't get those...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the time we went over to Shelbyville during the war , I wore an onion on my belt....which was the style at the time...you could n't get those white ones , you could only get those big yellow ones.................now where was I........oh yeah , the important thing was I was wearing an onion on my belt , which was the style at the time , you could n't get those...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the time we went over to Shelbyville during the war, I wore an onion on my belt....which was the style at the time...you couldn't get those white ones, you could only get those big yellow ones.................now where was I........oh yeah, the important thing was I was wearing an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time, you couldn't get those...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583469</id>
	<title>AOL Shuts down CompuServe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246713300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>AOL still exists?</htmltext>
<tokenext>AOL still exists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AOL still exists?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584165</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246724400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.</b></p><p>Me too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.Me too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.Me too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583079</id>
	<title>71162,2023 here.  Times have changed....</title>
	<author>CFD339</author>
	<datestamp>1246708440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....it was taped to a label on the back of my social security card, which I kept laminated (oh the horror) in my wallet.    I haven't even heard anyone mention compuserve in longer than it's been since I would dare keep my social security card in my wallet.  Times do change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....it was taped to a label on the back of my social security card , which I kept laminated ( oh the horror ) in my wallet .
I have n't even heard anyone mention compuserve in longer than it 's been since I would dare keep my social security card in my wallet .
Times do change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....it was taped to a label on the back of my social security card, which I kept laminated (oh the horror) in my wallet.
I haven't even heard anyone mention compuserve in longer than it's been since I would dare keep my social security card in my wallet.
Times do change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585209</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1246787640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>100025,3053<br>I think I looked at Golden Compass, but ended up using Virtual Access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>100025,3053I think I looked at Golden Compass , but ended up using Virtual Access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100025,3053I think I looked at Golden Compass, but ended up using Virtual Access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581727</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583923</id>
	<title>Re:memories of $12 an hour for 300 baud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246720320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the charges from the 9/86 Rate Card. I was going through my "How much did I pay for a 64 KB RAM?!?" file.</p><p>Charge per hour. Standard rates 8AM-6PM M-F, all other times and holidays are night rates<br>Up to 300 baud $12.50 std., $6.00/night<br>450 baud $13.25 std, $7.25 night<br>1200 baud $15.00 std, $12.50 night<br>2400 baud $22.50 std, $19.00 night<br>4800 baud* $32.50 std, $29.00 night<br>9600 baud* $47.50 std, $44.00 night<br>* - Requires hardwired network connection</p><p>Online storage charges<br>First 128,000 characters no charge (Files are stored 30 days from last acess)<br>Additional 64,000 characters $4.00/week</p><p>Communications surcharges<br>CompuServe Network $.25/hr<br>Telnet or Tymenet $10.00/hr day $2.00/hr night</p><p>Some of the other charges:<br>New password request $1.50<br>Quotes during market hours $0.07 per issue<br>Travelshopper $6.00/hour surcharge<br>OAG $32.00/hour surcharge<br>Aviation weather radar map<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 each<br>Executive news service $15.00/hr surcharge<br>Hollywood Hotline $6.00/hr surcharge</p><p>75756,654</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the charges from the 9/86 Rate Card .
I was going through my " How much did I pay for a 64 KB RAM ? ! ?
" file.Charge per hour .
Standard rates 8AM-6PM M-F , all other times and holidays are night ratesUp to 300 baud $ 12.50 std. , $ 6.00/night450 baud $ 13.25 std , $ 7.25 night1200 baud $ 15.00 std , $ 12.50 night2400 baud $ 22.50 std , $ 19.00 night4800 baud * $ 32.50 std , $ 29.00 night9600 baud * $ 47.50 std , $ 44.00 night * - Requires hardwired network connectionOnline storage chargesFirst 128,000 characters no charge ( Files are stored 30 days from last acess ) Additional 64,000 characters $ 4.00/weekCommunications surchargesCompuServe Network $ .25/hrTelnet or Tymenet $ 10.00/hr day $ 2.00/hr nightSome of the other charges : New password request $ 1.50Quotes during market hours $ 0.07 per issueTravelshopper $ 6.00/hour surchargeOAG $ 32.00/hour surchargeAviation weather radar map .50 eachExecutive news service $ 15.00/hr surchargeHollywood Hotline $ 6.00/hr surcharge75756,654</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the charges from the 9/86 Rate Card.
I was going through my "How much did I pay for a 64 KB RAM?!?
" file.Charge per hour.
Standard rates 8AM-6PM M-F, all other times and holidays are night ratesUp to 300 baud $12.50 std., $6.00/night450 baud $13.25 std, $7.25 night1200 baud $15.00 std, $12.50 night2400 baud $22.50 std, $19.00 night4800 baud* $32.50 std, $29.00 night9600 baud* $47.50 std, $44.00 night* - Requires hardwired network connectionOnline storage chargesFirst 128,000 characters no charge (Files are stored 30 days from last acess)Additional 64,000 characters $4.00/weekCommunications surchargesCompuServe Network $.25/hrTelnet or Tymenet $10.00/hr day $2.00/hr nightSome of the other charges:New password request $1.50Quotes during market hours $0.07 per issueTravelshopper $6.00/hour surchargeOAG $32.00/hour surchargeAviation weather radar map .50 eachExecutive news service $15.00/hr surchargeHollywood Hotline $6.00/hr surcharge75756,654</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586203</id>
	<title>Re:Prodigy?</title>
	<author>kchrist</author>
	<datestamp>1246806900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Prodigy Classic", the walled-garden part of the service (as opposed to "Prodigy Internet", their direct ISP service), shut down in 1999 due to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Curtain-to-close-on-Prodigy-Classic/2100-1023\_3-220617.html" title="cnet.com">insurmountable Y2K issues</a> [cnet.com] in the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Prodigy Classic " , the walled-garden part of the service ( as opposed to " Prodigy Internet " , their direct ISP service ) , shut down in 1999 due to insurmountable Y2K issues [ cnet.com ] in the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Prodigy Classic", the walled-garden part of the service (as opposed to "Prodigy Internet", their direct ISP service), shut down in 1999 due to insurmountable Y2K issues [cnet.com] in the software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28587639</id>
	<title>Re:Good Riddance</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1246823280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>they had accepted the terms of the rebate, received the $400, and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that back</i></p><p>What else could have happened?  Compuserve eat $400 on every customer who wanted a cheap computer?</p><p>It may have been that some of the customers were foolhardy, but you shouldn't fault yourself for that, the terms were perfectly reasonable (for people who don't know how to simply finance expenses).</p><p>Now salespeople who sold to customers with no local access<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that's kissing-close to fraud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they had accepted the terms of the rebate , received the $ 400 , and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that backWhat else could have happened ?
Compuserve eat $ 400 on every customer who wanted a cheap computer ? It may have been that some of the customers were foolhardy , but you should n't fault yourself for that , the terms were perfectly reasonable ( for people who do n't know how to simply finance expenses ) .Now salespeople who sold to customers with no local access ... that 's kissing-close to fraud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they had accepted the terms of the rebate, received the $400, and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that backWhat else could have happened?
Compuserve eat $400 on every customer who wanted a cheap computer?It may have been that some of the customers were foolhardy, but you shouldn't fault yourself for that, the terms were perfectly reasonable (for people who don't know how to simply finance expenses).Now salespeople who sold to customers with no local access ... that's kissing-close to fraud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584463</id>
	<title>Re:Migrating from CompuServe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246728780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>THANK YOU... my dad was looking for something like this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>THANK YOU... my dad was looking for something like this ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THANK YOU... my dad was looking for something like this ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584093</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Dhalka226</author>
	<datestamp>1246723080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually still remember my first nine-digit, changed-monthly numeric password to a dial-in BBS called God's Country which ran on DDial on six 300 Baud modems in Apple ][e's.  I think I was like 10 at the time, so it would have been about 15 years ago.

</p><p>Oddly I don't remember any other of the passwords though.  I'm not sure why that first one made such an impression when, say, the last one didn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually still remember my first nine-digit , changed-monthly numeric password to a dial-in BBS called God 's Country which ran on DDial on six 300 Baud modems in Apple ] [ e 's .
I think I was like 10 at the time , so it would have been about 15 years ago .
Oddly I do n't remember any other of the passwords though .
I 'm not sure why that first one made such an impression when , say , the last one did n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually still remember my first nine-digit, changed-monthly numeric password to a dial-in BBS called God's Country which ran on DDial on six 300 Baud modems in Apple ][e's.
I think I was like 10 at the time, so it would have been about 15 years ago.
Oddly I don't remember any other of the passwords though.
I'm not sure why that first one made such an impression when, say, the last one didn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582051</id>
	<title>HTML beat NAPLPS</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1246739880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's pretty much what happened.  But, to some extent, Prodigy's protocol was ahead of its time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's pretty much what happened .
But , to some extent , Prodigy 's protocol was ahead of its time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's pretty much what happened.
But, to some extent, Prodigy's protocol was ahead of its time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>spiffyman</author>
	<datestamp>1246733640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know, but we should come up with one. "Go back to the nursing home?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but we should come up with one .
" Go back to the nursing home ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but we should come up with one.
"Go back to the nursing home?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583487</id>
	<title>Had some good times on there...</title>
	<author>IncarnadineArt</author>
	<datestamp>1246713420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>103102,1434 here - signed up in Canada (in 1987 I think.) Had a good long run in the forums, particularly gaming and 3d art. The e-mail was also very useful as I traveled on business a bunch and while it was dial-up, I used it everywhere from Texas to the UK (handy). Finally closed out the e-mail last year as it was finally getting spammed stupid, sorry to see it go though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>103102,1434 here - signed up in Canada ( in 1987 I think .
) Had a good long run in the forums , particularly gaming and 3d art .
The e-mail was also very useful as I traveled on business a bunch and while it was dial-up , I used it everywhere from Texas to the UK ( handy ) .
Finally closed out the e-mail last year as it was finally getting spammed stupid , sorry to see it go though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>103102,1434 here - signed up in Canada (in 1987 I think.
) Had a good long run in the forums, particularly gaming and 3d art.
The e-mail was also very useful as I traveled on business a bunch and while it was dial-up, I used it everywhere from Texas to the UK (handy).
Finally closed out the e-mail last year as it was finally getting spammed stupid, sorry to see it go though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582793</id>
	<title>Re:Prodigy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246704420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to smell your panties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to smell your panties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to smell your panties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582723</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246703700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah the beauty of DEC and octal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah the beauty of DEC and octal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah the beauty of DEC and octal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28594061</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1246892760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the last company I worked at, I was instructed to block AOL users from accessing our product demo download page on the website.  When users provided their info for a download, a link was generated with a hash that included their IP address (the IP was grabbed for directing users to the closest server).  However, since AOL routes all their Internet traffic through a set of proxies, the IP presented to the web server would likely change with every access, thus making the links provided to users useless.</p><p>The reason I was instructed to block AOL users is because it was easier to not deal with emails consisting of "WHY CANT I DL UR FILEZ???????" from people who weren't going to by the product anyway than it was to actually fix the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the last company I worked at , I was instructed to block AOL users from accessing our product demo download page on the website .
When users provided their info for a download , a link was generated with a hash that included their IP address ( the IP was grabbed for directing users to the closest server ) .
However , since AOL routes all their Internet traffic through a set of proxies , the IP presented to the web server would likely change with every access , thus making the links provided to users useless.The reason I was instructed to block AOL users is because it was easier to not deal with emails consisting of " WHY CANT I DL UR FILEZ ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
" from people who were n't going to by the product anyway than it was to actually fix the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the last company I worked at, I was instructed to block AOL users from accessing our product demo download page on the website.
When users provided their info for a download, a link was generated with a hash that included their IP address (the IP was grabbed for directing users to the closest server).
However, since AOL routes all their Internet traffic through a set of proxies, the IP presented to the web server would likely change with every access, thus making the links provided to users useless.The reason I was instructed to block AOL users is because it was easier to not deal with emails consisting of "WHY CANT I DL UR FILEZ???????
" from people who weren't going to by the product anyway than it was to actually fix the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581799</id>
	<title>Fixing CS bugs from 1995!</title>
	<author>Aliotroph</author>
	<datestamp>1246736700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A couple years ago I was working at Dell and got a call from an old lady whose CS client broke.  Seems it would eat half the CPU time instead of shutting down.  She paid us $99 to fix it because she liked it that much. Solution was to patch the client from something like 7.xya to 7.xyb.  Changing only from an a to b version in so much time didn't seem very encouraging since I couldn't find any kind of changelog.  The thing worked and good thing too. Googling the issue wasn't getting me anywhere that day.</p><p>The funny part came when an L2 wandered by and asked what I was doing. I think he just about died when I told him I was fixing CompuServe. That's when the guy two seats down, a former ISP guy, piped up and told us it's had that bug since 1995 and her issue will likely return in a few months.</p><p>I understand people wanting to keep their old e-mail addresses but honestly I find it weird when they want to keep their 1990s method of browsing the web. I certainly don't have any attachment to whatever version of Netscape I was using back when she signed up for CS.  The days of the pages with the default gray backgrounds are finally gone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple years ago I was working at Dell and got a call from an old lady whose CS client broke .
Seems it would eat half the CPU time instead of shutting down .
She paid us $ 99 to fix it because she liked it that much .
Solution was to patch the client from something like 7.xya to 7.xyb .
Changing only from an a to b version in so much time did n't seem very encouraging since I could n't find any kind of changelog .
The thing worked and good thing too .
Googling the issue was n't getting me anywhere that day.The funny part came when an L2 wandered by and asked what I was doing .
I think he just about died when I told him I was fixing CompuServe .
That 's when the guy two seats down , a former ISP guy , piped up and told us it 's had that bug since 1995 and her issue will likely return in a few months.I understand people wanting to keep their old e-mail addresses but honestly I find it weird when they want to keep their 1990s method of browsing the web .
I certainly do n't have any attachment to whatever version of Netscape I was using back when she signed up for CS .
The days of the pages with the default gray backgrounds are finally gone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple years ago I was working at Dell and got a call from an old lady whose CS client broke.
Seems it would eat half the CPU time instead of shutting down.
She paid us $99 to fix it because she liked it that much.
Solution was to patch the client from something like 7.xya to 7.xyb.
Changing only from an a to b version in so much time didn't seem very encouraging since I couldn't find any kind of changelog.
The thing worked and good thing too.
Googling the issue wasn't getting me anywhere that day.The funny part came when an L2 wandered by and asked what I was doing.
I think he just about died when I told him I was fixing CompuServe.
That's when the guy two seats down, a former ISP guy, piped up and told us it's had that bug since 1995 and her issue will likely return in a few months.I understand people wanting to keep their old e-mail addresses but honestly I find it weird when they want to keep their 1990s method of browsing the web.
I certainly don't have any attachment to whatever version of Netscape I was using back when she signed up for CS.
The days of the pages with the default gray backgrounds are finally gone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581949</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1246738620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>72343,1545. RIP CompuServe. I miss ya.</htmltext>
<tokenext>72343,1545 .
RIP CompuServe .
I miss ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>72343,1545.
RIP CompuServe.
I miss ya.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</id>
	<title>Good Riddance</title>
	<author>SirLurksAlot</author>
	<datestamp>1246732020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compuserve might've been great at one time, but it hasn't been for a much longer period.  I used to do customer service for them back when they were offering a $400 rebate on new computers... as long as people signed up for a 2 year service agreement with them.  I felt dirty every time I had to take a call from someone that had one of those rebates.  Half the time the callers wanted to cancel their service because of how piss poor their dial-up connection was and it was my job to "remind" them about the terms which stated that they had to pay back the rebate PLUS a cancellation fee.  I put remind in quotes because it was often the customer's first time hearing about the terms in the first place (Admittedly this was usually the sales person's fault, and usually not Compuserve's.).  I remember one call in particular when a customer in Pennsylvania had purchased a computer with the rebate only to find out that they only had TWO dial-up numbers in the whole state available to them, neither of which was a local call for them.  I had to tell this poor soul that they had accepted the terms of the rebate, received the $400, and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that back, etc even though they couldn't even use the service.  Now Compuserve was obviously not the only ISP that played the rebate game, but their participation left a bad taste in mouth and lowered my opinion of them greatly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compuserve might 've been great at one time , but it has n't been for a much longer period .
I used to do customer service for them back when they were offering a $ 400 rebate on new computers... as long as people signed up for a 2 year service agreement with them .
I felt dirty every time I had to take a call from someone that had one of those rebates .
Half the time the callers wanted to cancel their service because of how piss poor their dial-up connection was and it was my job to " remind " them about the terms which stated that they had to pay back the rebate PLUS a cancellation fee .
I put remind in quotes because it was often the customer 's first time hearing about the terms in the first place ( Admittedly this was usually the sales person 's fault , and usually not Compuserve 's. ) .
I remember one call in particular when a customer in Pennsylvania had purchased a computer with the rebate only to find out that they only had TWO dial-up numbers in the whole state available to them , neither of which was a local call for them .
I had to tell this poor soul that they had accepted the terms of the rebate , received the $ 400 , and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that back , etc even though they could n't even use the service .
Now Compuserve was obviously not the only ISP that played the rebate game , but their participation left a bad taste in mouth and lowered my opinion of them greatly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compuserve might've been great at one time, but it hasn't been for a much longer period.
I used to do customer service for them back when they were offering a $400 rebate on new computers... as long as people signed up for a 2 year service agreement with them.
I felt dirty every time I had to take a call from someone that had one of those rebates.
Half the time the callers wanted to cancel their service because of how piss poor their dial-up connection was and it was my job to "remind" them about the terms which stated that they had to pay back the rebate PLUS a cancellation fee.
I put remind in quotes because it was often the customer's first time hearing about the terms in the first place (Admittedly this was usually the sales person's fault, and usually not Compuserve's.).
I remember one call in particular when a customer in Pennsylvania had purchased a computer with the rebate only to find out that they only had TWO dial-up numbers in the whole state available to them, neither of which was a local call for them.
I had to tell this poor soul that they had accepted the terms of the rebate, received the $400, and if they cancelled they would owe Compuserve all that back, etc even though they couldn't even use the service.
Now Compuserve was obviously not the only ISP that played the rebate game, but their participation left a bad taste in mouth and lowered my opinion of them greatly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585681</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>punterjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1246797360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I must admit, hearing of the demise of CompuServe is like hearing an obit of a celebrity you didn't know was still alive.
I haven't thought of CIS in years, though - along with the Source, it was my "gateway drug" from BBS to commercial services.
  It's too bad AOL can't donate all the CIS IP to someplace like the Internet Archive, to preserve it - sort of like an online Colonial Williamsburg (grin). CompuServe, now that I'm reminded of you, I miss you.
  Time to break out the old Dead Kennedy's &amp; Sex Pistols LPs &amp; wax nostalgic for"morning in America"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I must admit , hearing of the demise of CompuServe is like hearing an obit of a celebrity you did n't know was still alive .
I have n't thought of CIS in years , though - along with the Source , it was my " gateway drug " from BBS to commercial services .
It 's too bad AOL ca n't donate all the CIS IP to someplace like the Internet Archive , to preserve it - sort of like an online Colonial Williamsburg ( grin ) .
CompuServe , now that I 'm reminded of you , I miss you .
Time to break out the old Dead Kennedy 's &amp; Sex Pistols LPs &amp; wax nostalgic for " morning in America "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must admit, hearing of the demise of CompuServe is like hearing an obit of a celebrity you didn't know was still alive.
I haven't thought of CIS in years, though - along with the Source, it was my "gateway drug" from BBS to commercial services.
It's too bad AOL can't donate all the CIS IP to someplace like the Internet Archive, to preserve it - sort of like an online Colonial Williamsburg (grin).
CompuServe, now that I'm reminded of you, I miss you.
Time to break out the old Dead Kennedy's &amp; Sex Pistols LPs &amp; wax nostalgic for"morning in America"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584663</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>JoeF</author>
	<datestamp>1246733040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I canceled my Compuserve account the day AOL bought them. I would never have anything to do with AOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I canceled my Compuserve account the day AOL bought them .
I would never have anything to do with AOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I canceled my Compuserve account the day AOL bought them.
I would never have anything to do with AOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581523</id>
	<title>memories of $12 an hour for 300 baud</title>
	<author>mikeskup@mcsrepair.c</author>
	<datestamp>1246734120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember in mid 80's paying alaskanet? $6 an hour to get connected from Naknek AK instead of long distance charge &amp; then paying another like $6 an hour for the compuserve, plus a monthly $25 or such to compuserve....</p><p>all for 300 baud<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... watching those characters come in..... just about as fast as you could read...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember in mid 80 's paying alaskanet ?
$ 6 an hour to get connected from Naknek AK instead of long distance charge &amp; then paying another like $ 6 an hour for the compuserve , plus a monthly $ 25 or such to compuserve....all for 300 baud ... watching those characters come in..... just about as fast as you could read.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember in mid 80's paying alaskanet?
$6 an hour to get connected from Naknek AK instead of long distance charge &amp; then paying another like $6 an hour for the compuserve, plus a monthly $25 or such to compuserve....all for 300 baud ... watching those characters come in..... just about as fast as you could read...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581883</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1246737600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was D.DVORKIN1 on GEnie, since my father already had D.DVORKIN.  Kept meaning to change it, since people were always mixing us up, and then of course it wasn't an issue any more.</p><p>Alas, GEnie!  (And "Genie" was never the same.)  Really a great place to get an introduction to the online world.  Those endless exchanges on the SFRT taught me a lot, and I think the level of the writing was higher there than in any other online forum I've ever seen.  (Of course, the fact that it was the unofficial home of SFWA for a number of years didn't hurt -- when you have a bunch of professional writers posting, other posters tend to follow suit.)  Actually, Slashdot is the closest thing I've found since.  I'm not sure if this is praise of Slashdot or an indictment of, well, everything else.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was D.DVORKIN1 on GEnie , since my father already had D.DVORKIN .
Kept meaning to change it , since people were always mixing us up , and then of course it was n't an issue any more.Alas , GEnie !
( And " Genie " was never the same .
) Really a great place to get an introduction to the online world .
Those endless exchanges on the SFRT taught me a lot , and I think the level of the writing was higher there than in any other online forum I 've ever seen .
( Of course , the fact that it was the unofficial home of SFWA for a number of years did n't hurt -- when you have a bunch of professional writers posting , other posters tend to follow suit .
) Actually , Slashdot is the closest thing I 've found since .
I 'm not sure if this is praise of Slashdot or an indictment of , well , everything else .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was D.DVORKIN1 on GEnie, since my father already had D.DVORKIN.
Kept meaning to change it, since people were always mixing us up, and then of course it wasn't an issue any more.Alas, GEnie!
(And "Genie" was never the same.
)  Really a great place to get an introduction to the online world.
Those endless exchanges on the SFRT taught me a lot, and I think the level of the writing was higher there than in any other online forum I've ever seen.
(Of course, the fact that it was the unofficial home of SFWA for a number of years didn't hurt -- when you have a bunch of professional writers posting, other posters tend to follow suit.
)  Actually, Slashdot is the closest thing I've found since.
I'm not sure if this is praise of Slashdot or an indictment of, well, everything else.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</id>
	<title>Hey gramps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246733100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the "get off my lawn" equivalent for young-&gt;old</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the " get off my lawn " equivalent for young- &gt; old</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the "get off my lawn" equivalent for young-&gt;old</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585361</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1246790520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The final Compuserve clients were basically reskinned AOL client built with the largely the same code base. An interesting piece of trivia is that the final versions of the client used the Mozilla Gecko browser engine. I think it was equivalent to Mozilla 0.8 / Netscape 6 or so at the time but it was pretty stable and actually logged less crash incidents than embedded IE.
<p>
The idea was the Compuserve client would serve as a guinea pig for embedding Mozilla and when the company was confident enough the AOL client itself would transition. Unfortunately they were terrified that their support calls would jump if the Mozilla engine didn't support every shitty web site infected with ActiveX controls or VBScript. Then MS came along a waved a huge wad of money under their noses to settle the browser suit. So they chickened out, took the money and faded into obscurity.
</p><p>
So Compuserve represents the one and only release client from AOL that contained their own browser. It's sad really. Ironically for Microsoft I think they should have paid AOL to keep Mozilla and use it since Firefox might not have existed otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The final Compuserve clients were basically reskinned AOL client built with the largely the same code base .
An interesting piece of trivia is that the final versions of the client used the Mozilla Gecko browser engine .
I think it was equivalent to Mozilla 0.8 / Netscape 6 or so at the time but it was pretty stable and actually logged less crash incidents than embedded IE .
The idea was the Compuserve client would serve as a guinea pig for embedding Mozilla and when the company was confident enough the AOL client itself would transition .
Unfortunately they were terrified that their support calls would jump if the Mozilla engine did n't support every shitty web site infected with ActiveX controls or VBScript .
Then MS came along a waved a huge wad of money under their noses to settle the browser suit .
So they chickened out , took the money and faded into obscurity .
So Compuserve represents the one and only release client from AOL that contained their own browser .
It 's sad really .
Ironically for Microsoft I think they should have paid AOL to keep Mozilla and use it since Firefox might not have existed otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The final Compuserve clients were basically reskinned AOL client built with the largely the same code base.
An interesting piece of trivia is that the final versions of the client used the Mozilla Gecko browser engine.
I think it was equivalent to Mozilla 0.8 / Netscape 6 or so at the time but it was pretty stable and actually logged less crash incidents than embedded IE.
The idea was the Compuserve client would serve as a guinea pig for embedding Mozilla and when the company was confident enough the AOL client itself would transition.
Unfortunately they were terrified that their support calls would jump if the Mozilla engine didn't support every shitty web site infected with ActiveX controls or VBScript.
Then MS came along a waved a huge wad of money under their noses to settle the browser suit.
So they chickened out, took the money and faded into obscurity.
So Compuserve represents the one and only release client from AOL that contained their own browser.
It's sad really.
Ironically for Microsoft I think they should have paid AOL to keep Mozilla and use it since Firefox might not have existed otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585955</id>
	<title>Good old Compuserve.</title>
	<author>murph</author>
	<datestamp>1246802760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was 72638,1421, but that was the second time around.  I initially had an account sometime account 82/83 with my Vic-20.  Racked up a HUGE bill, and got the plug pulled by my folks after a single month.  I wish I knew what that original ID was.  It took a long time to convince them to allow me to use the phone to call local BBSs after that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was 72638,1421 , but that was the second time around .
I initially had an account sometime account 82/83 with my Vic-20 .
Racked up a HUGE bill , and got the plug pulled by my folks after a single month .
I wish I knew what that original ID was .
It took a long time to convince them to allow me to use the phone to call local BBSs after that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was 72638,1421, but that was the second time around.
I initially had an account sometime account 82/83 with my Vic-20.
Racked up a HUGE bill, and got the plug pulled by my folks after a single month.
I wish I knew what that original ID was.
It took a long time to convince them to allow me to use the phone to call local BBSs after that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581627</id>
	<title>The more things change</title>
	<author>Tom DBA</author>
	<datestamp>1246734900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before all the tubes got connected business cards were full of email addresses.  One had at least a Compuserve address, a Prodigy address, an AOL address, a company VAXMail address, a company VM/VMS address and perhaps a DARPA/ARPA address.</p><p>All that is changed now.</p><p>Now we list Company main telephone number, Company direct dial number, Company fax number, Home number, Company cell number and perhaps a Skype id.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before all the tubes got connected business cards were full of email addresses .
One had at least a Compuserve address , a Prodigy address , an AOL address , a company VAXMail address , a company VM/VMS address and perhaps a DARPA/ARPA address.All that is changed now.Now we list Company main telephone number , Company direct dial number , Company fax number , Home number , Company cell number and perhaps a Skype id .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before all the tubes got connected business cards were full of email addresses.
One had at least a Compuserve address, a Prodigy address, an AOL address, a company VAXMail address, a company VM/VMS address and perhaps a DARPA/ARPA address.All that is changed now.Now we list Company main telephone number, Company direct dial number, Company fax number, Home number, Company cell number and perhaps a Skype id.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28592267</id>
	<title>INTERNET:</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1246875480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The exciting day came when email could be sent to non-CS addresses by prefixing INTERNET: to the address. Web access was initially provided on a different phone number to the standard CS one, so if you got sick of web browsing at 9600 baud, you could hang up, redial and cruise round the CS forums instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The exciting day came when email could be sent to non-CS addresses by prefixing INTERNET : to the address .
Web access was initially provided on a different phone number to the standard CS one , so if you got sick of web browsing at 9600 baud , you could hang up , redial and cruise round the CS forums instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The exciting day came when email could be sent to non-CS addresses by prefixing INTERNET: to the address.
Web access was initially provided on a different phone number to the standard CS one, so if you got sick of web browsing at 9600 baud, you could hang up, redial and cruise round the CS forums instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581685</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>jd2112</author>
	<datestamp>1246735440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot to say "No get off my lawn!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot to say " No get off my lawn !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot to say "No get off my lawn!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581229</id>
	<title>RIP</title>
	<author>resfilter</author>
	<datestamp>1246731960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>compuserve was the first thing i ever dialed with my first real computer, as it was the first actual service provider to have a local phone number in my area when i was a kid</p><p>i was completely in awe of it when i first used it, it cost me a good chunk of my allowance, but i remember it made the local BBS systems, as well as some other service providers that eventually crept into my area seem like toys</p><p>i used it for quite a long time even after everyone else had proper internet service (the internet took quite a while to get here)</p><p>i'll always have fond memories of it</p><p>suprised it took this long to die, but RIP anyways</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>compuserve was the first thing i ever dialed with my first real computer , as it was the first actual service provider to have a local phone number in my area when i was a kidi was completely in awe of it when i first used it , it cost me a good chunk of my allowance , but i remember it made the local BBS systems , as well as some other service providers that eventually crept into my area seem like toysi used it for quite a long time even after everyone else had proper internet service ( the internet took quite a while to get here ) i 'll always have fond memories of itsuprised it took this long to die , but RIP anyways</tokentext>
<sentencetext>compuserve was the first thing i ever dialed with my first real computer, as it was the first actual service provider to have a local phone number in my area when i was a kidi was completely in awe of it when i first used it, it cost me a good chunk of my allowance, but i remember it made the local BBS systems, as well as some other service providers that eventually crept into my area seem like toysi used it for quite a long time even after everyone else had proper internet service (the internet took quite a while to get here)i'll always have fond memories of itsuprised it took this long to die, but RIP anyways</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585819</id>
	<title>The day the changed the online world:</title>
	<author>MtViewGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1246800660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>August 24, 1995, the day that Windows 95 became a retail product.</p><p>Why? Because it incorporated a built-in SLIP/PPP networking client that could connect to the Internet either by a network card that connected to a local area network with a gateway to the Internet or through a dial-up connection. Once that happened, people no longer needed proprietary online services such as CompuServe and America Online to access the Internet, and because of the sheer number of users switching to Window 95 by 1996, many users started to access through an Internet Service Provider (ISP). Indeed, that's how I got onto the Internet--I signed up for an local ISP account and they sent me the Windows 95 version of Netscape 2.0 customized for the ISP.</p><p>Don't laugh at my suggestion. Before Windows 95, if you wanted Internet access Microsoft DOS/Windows users needed to install a separate program called Winsock that provided the SLIP/PPP client to access the Internet--but given the penchant of new computer users most of them never did install Winsock and went the proprietary online service route instead. Windows 95 eliminated that problem, and it even opened the door for today's broadband access to the Internet, since most computer access the Internet through the RJ-45 network connection jack at download speeds as high as 100 megabits per second in a few countries like South Korea or parts of Japan.</p><p>With people migrating <i>en masse</i> to ISP's, both CompuServe and AOL declined, and by 2000 both were overtaken by ISP's, with names we recognize today: Comcast, EarthLink, Verizon, plus a host of smaller, more regional ISP's.</p><p>I will miss CompuServe. It served it purpose for its time, but it has become a relic of the old, pre-public Internet days of online access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>August 24 , 1995 , the day that Windows 95 became a retail product.Why ?
Because it incorporated a built-in SLIP/PPP networking client that could connect to the Internet either by a network card that connected to a local area network with a gateway to the Internet or through a dial-up connection .
Once that happened , people no longer needed proprietary online services such as CompuServe and America Online to access the Internet , and because of the sheer number of users switching to Window 95 by 1996 , many users started to access through an Internet Service Provider ( ISP ) .
Indeed , that 's how I got onto the Internet--I signed up for an local ISP account and they sent me the Windows 95 version of Netscape 2.0 customized for the ISP.Do n't laugh at my suggestion .
Before Windows 95 , if you wanted Internet access Microsoft DOS/Windows users needed to install a separate program called Winsock that provided the SLIP/PPP client to access the Internet--but given the penchant of new computer users most of them never did install Winsock and went the proprietary online service route instead .
Windows 95 eliminated that problem , and it even opened the door for today 's broadband access to the Internet , since most computer access the Internet through the RJ-45 network connection jack at download speeds as high as 100 megabits per second in a few countries like South Korea or parts of Japan.With people migrating en masse to ISP 's , both CompuServe and AOL declined , and by 2000 both were overtaken by ISP 's , with names we recognize today : Comcast , EarthLink , Verizon , plus a host of smaller , more regional ISP 's.I will miss CompuServe .
It served it purpose for its time , but it has become a relic of the old , pre-public Internet days of online access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>August 24, 1995, the day that Windows 95 became a retail product.Why?
Because it incorporated a built-in SLIP/PPP networking client that could connect to the Internet either by a network card that connected to a local area network with a gateway to the Internet or through a dial-up connection.
Once that happened, people no longer needed proprietary online services such as CompuServe and America Online to access the Internet, and because of the sheer number of users switching to Window 95 by 1996, many users started to access through an Internet Service Provider (ISP).
Indeed, that's how I got onto the Internet--I signed up for an local ISP account and they sent me the Windows 95 version of Netscape 2.0 customized for the ISP.Don't laugh at my suggestion.
Before Windows 95, if you wanted Internet access Microsoft DOS/Windows users needed to install a separate program called Winsock that provided the SLIP/PPP client to access the Internet--but given the penchant of new computer users most of them never did install Winsock and went the proprietary online service route instead.
Windows 95 eliminated that problem, and it even opened the door for today's broadband access to the Internet, since most computer access the Internet through the RJ-45 network connection jack at download speeds as high as 100 megabits per second in a few countries like South Korea or parts of Japan.With people migrating en masse to ISP's, both CompuServe and AOL declined, and by 2000 both were overtaken by ISP's, with names we recognize today: Comcast, EarthLink, Verizon, plus a host of smaller, more regional ISP's.I will miss CompuServe.
It served it purpose for its time, but it has become a relic of the old, pre-public Internet days of online access.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585053</id>
	<title>Remembering that old number....</title>
	<author>zuki</author>
	<datestamp>1246784460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was a member since 1984, for about 15 years or so. And I so clearly remember my number as well!!<br> <br>
<b> 75056,3611 </b> <br> <br>

Fond memories of an age that really pre-dated the Internet by so long.
<br> <br>
z.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a member since 1984 , for about 15 years or so .
And I so clearly remember my number as well ! !
75056,3611 Fond memories of an age that really pre-dated the Internet by so long .
z .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a member since 1984, for about 15 years or so.
And I so clearly remember my number as well!!
75056,3611   

Fond memories of an age that really pre-dated the Internet by so long.
z.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582005</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Doctor O</author>
	<datestamp>1246739340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh well, 100531,3420 here. Yup, we Europeans had different numbers, and back in the old days before Eternal September you could even tell the geographical area of someone just by his CIS ID.</p><p>For all those who tagged this story "andnothingofvaluewaslost": Back in the day, you could only join CompuServe providing ID and using your real name. It's amazing how much nicer people behaved and how much more substance there was in the discussions. Because, you know, you didn't want your name associated with talking out of your ass. Much less flaming also, leave alone trolling. The trolls couldn't hold onto their accounts for long, because without ID they wouldn't get new ones. Oh, and for the same reasons there was no spam whatsoever.</p><p>It was a great time. It went down the drain when German laws dictated that everybody had to be allowed in, using nicknames, and without proof of identity. Then came the trolls, the idiots, and Eternal September followed.</p><p>I was a sysop, and even a wizop (Wizard Sysop, basically "root" of the forum), and have seen much of the shit which started when AOL took over. That basically killed the spirit. It's a real pity that I signed a pretty badass NDA, otherwise all that would make for a great book on how *not* to run an online service.</p><p>*sigh*</p><p>I feel old now. Being online used to be fun and fascinating and educational. Nowadays it's, well, shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh well , 100531,3420 here .
Yup , we Europeans had different numbers , and back in the old days before Eternal September you could even tell the geographical area of someone just by his CIS ID.For all those who tagged this story " andnothingofvaluewaslost " : Back in the day , you could only join CompuServe providing ID and using your real name .
It 's amazing how much nicer people behaved and how much more substance there was in the discussions .
Because , you know , you did n't want your name associated with talking out of your ass .
Much less flaming also , leave alone trolling .
The trolls could n't hold onto their accounts for long , because without ID they would n't get new ones .
Oh , and for the same reasons there was no spam whatsoever.It was a great time .
It went down the drain when German laws dictated that everybody had to be allowed in , using nicknames , and without proof of identity .
Then came the trolls , the idiots , and Eternal September followed.I was a sysop , and even a wizop ( Wizard Sysop , basically " root " of the forum ) , and have seen much of the shit which started when AOL took over .
That basically killed the spirit .
It 's a real pity that I signed a pretty badass NDA , otherwise all that would make for a great book on how * not * to run an online service .
* sigh * I feel old now .
Being online used to be fun and fascinating and educational .
Nowadays it 's , well , shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh well, 100531,3420 here.
Yup, we Europeans had different numbers, and back in the old days before Eternal September you could even tell the geographical area of someone just by his CIS ID.For all those who tagged this story "andnothingofvaluewaslost": Back in the day, you could only join CompuServe providing ID and using your real name.
It's amazing how much nicer people behaved and how much more substance there was in the discussions.
Because, you know, you didn't want your name associated with talking out of your ass.
Much less flaming also, leave alone trolling.
The trolls couldn't hold onto their accounts for long, because without ID they wouldn't get new ones.
Oh, and for the same reasons there was no spam whatsoever.It was a great time.
It went down the drain when German laws dictated that everybody had to be allowed in, using nicknames, and without proof of identity.
Then came the trolls, the idiots, and Eternal September followed.I was a sysop, and even a wizop (Wizard Sysop, basically "root" of the forum), and have seen much of the shit which started when AOL took over.
That basically killed the spirit.
It's a real pity that I signed a pretty badass NDA, otherwise all that would make for a great book on how *not* to run an online service.
*sigh*I feel old now.
Being online used to be fun and fascinating and educational.
Nowadays it's, well, shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165</id>
	<title>Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246731420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't remember my Account Number, but I signed up in 1987, shortly after I bought my Atari 1040ST and a 2400-baud modem. I got hooked on the CB Simulator, and spent myself into severe debt. Good times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't remember my Account Number , but I signed up in 1987 , shortly after I bought my Atari 1040ST and a 2400-baud modem .
I got hooked on the CB Simulator , and spent myself into severe debt .
Good times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't remember my Account Number, but I signed up in 1987, shortly after I bought my Atari 1040ST and a 2400-baud modem.
I got hooked on the CB Simulator, and spent myself into severe debt.
Good times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584549</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>hutsell</author>
	<datestamp>1246730700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DuhHhh! *exagerated eye rolling, etc.*</htmltext>
<tokenext>DuhHhh !
* exagerated eye rolling , etc .
*</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DuhHhh!
*exagerated eye rolling, etc.
*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582455</id>
	<title>finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246700640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm amazed they hadn't already pulled the plug... now it's time to pull the plug on aol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amazed they had n't already pulled the plug... now it 's time to pull the plug on aol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amazed they hadn't already pulled the plug... now it's time to pull the plug on aol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582767</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>micheas</author>
	<datestamp>1246704120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you know of any public gopher servers that are still alive?</p><p>My list died out in the last four years when I wasn't watching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know of any public gopher servers that are still alive ? My list died out in the last four years when I was n't watching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know of any public gopher servers that are still alive?My list died out in the last four years when I wasn't watching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581177</id>
	<title>The PITS (reward)</title>
	<author>wls</author>
	<datestamp>1246731600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone remember playing the game "The PITS" on CompuServe?  Or, even better, know if thesource survived?</p><p>http://games.wwco.com/pits/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone remember playing the game " The PITS " on CompuServe ?
Or , even better , know if thesource survived ? http : //games.wwco.com/pits/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone remember playing the game "The PITS" on CompuServe?
Or, even better, know if thesource survived?http://games.wwco.com/pits/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209</id>
	<title>Migrating from CompuServe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246731840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Goodbye to what was once an incredibly innovative service...</p><p>For any Slashdot readers who need to get a friend or relative off of CompuServe:</p><p>Users who are running CompuServe 3 or 4 can export the address book using:<br>http://www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57262</p><p>Users who are running CompuServe 2000, 6 or 7 can export the address book and email using:<br>http://www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57267</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goodbye to what was once an incredibly innovative service...For any Slashdot readers who need to get a friend or relative off of CompuServe : Users who are running CompuServe 3 or 4 can export the address book using : http : //www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57262Users who are running CompuServe 2000 , 6 or 7 can export the address book and email using : http : //www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57267</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goodbye to what was once an incredibly innovative service...For any Slashdot readers who need to get a friend or relative off of CompuServe:Users who are running CompuServe 3 or 4 can export the address book using:http://www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57262Users who are running CompuServe 2000, 6 or 7 can export the address book and email using:http://www.connectedsw.com/Overview/57267</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246733580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I signed up in 1983 or so, after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem. The CB Simulator was fun.  I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.</p></div><p>Yes, and it was considered extremely rude to ask someone's age, sex or location, at least without spending a couple of weeks getting to know them. In fact, it was pretty easy to offend somebody by being too familiar too soon. Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored, as if you didn't exist.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I signed up in 1983 or so , after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem .
The CB Simulator was fun .
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words , not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.Yes , and it was considered extremely rude to ask someone 's age , sex or location , at least without spending a couple of weeks getting to know them .
In fact , it was pretty easy to offend somebody by being too familiar too soon .
Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored , as if you did n't exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I signed up in 1983 or so, after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem.
The CB Simulator was fun.
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.Yes, and it was considered extremely rude to ask someone's age, sex or location, at least without spending a couple of weeks getting to know them.
In fact, it was pretty easy to offend somebody by being too familiar too soon.
Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored, as if you didn't exist.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581869</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246737420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would go with something like "The Buffet is on Tuesdays", or maybe "Ruuuuuunnnn, change is coming!!!".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would go with something like " The Buffet is on Tuesdays " , or maybe " Ruuuuuunnnn , change is coming ! ! !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would go with something like "The Buffet is on Tuesdays", or maybe "Ruuuuuunnnn, change is coming!!!
".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583951</id>
	<title>Reason</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1246720740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There must be a reason that Compuserve's home page looks a lot like those AOL disks I used to get in the mail.</p><p>The disks got to be to expensive?  Or the postage?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There must be a reason that Compuserve 's home page looks a lot like those AOL disks I used to get in the mail.The disks got to be to expensive ?
Or the postage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There must be a reason that Compuserve's home page looks a lot like those AOL disks I used to get in the mail.The disks got to be to expensive?
Or the postage?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581649</id>
	<title>Signed up in 1984, had the account for 13 years</title>
	<author>sdw</author>
	<datestamp>1246735140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>76244,210<br>Atari 400 at 300 baud...  Used CB Simulator, wanted to start a number of forums that foreshadowed very successful web sites...</p><p>Later, I wrote Buddylist at AOL.</p><p>I still have printouts of the service somewhere in my records.</p><p>Stephen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>76244,210Atari 400 at 300 baud... Used CB Simulator , wanted to start a number of forums that foreshadowed very successful web sites...Later , I wrote Buddylist at AOL.I still have printouts of the service somewhere in my records.Stephen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>76244,210Atari 400 at 300 baud...  Used CB Simulator, wanted to start a number of forums that foreshadowed very successful web sites...Later, I wrote Buddylist at AOL.I still have printouts of the service somewhere in my records.Stephen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583209</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>GravityStar</author>
	<datestamp>1246710000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, it was like talking to women?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it was like talking to women ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it was like talking to women?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581871</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>MaxiCat\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1246737420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, Compuserve probably knew more about DECsystem-10s than DEC did. At one point<br>they even designed their own power supply to replace the DEC one as it was much<br>more efficient. They designed and built their own disk controllers to use cheaper<br>(IBM) disks. They had a LOT of them!</p><p>Phil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , Compuserve probably knew more about DECsystem-10s than DEC did .
At one pointthey even designed their own power supply to replace the DEC one as it was muchmore efficient .
They designed and built their own disk controllers to use cheaper ( IBM ) disks .
They had a LOT of them ! Phil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, Compuserve probably knew more about DECsystem-10s than DEC did.
At one pointthey even designed their own power supply to replace the DEC one as it was muchmore efficient.
They designed and built their own disk controllers to use cheaper(IBM) disks.
They had a LOT of them!Phil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581587</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28613319</id>
	<title>"Sweet Savage Star Trek" from Compuserve</title>
	<author>Tarantulas</author>
	<datestamp>1246958580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. SSST was written by members of the Compuserve Science Fiction and Fantasy forum from July 23 1989 through August 21 1989.<br>
2. The "DSPSG" mentioned in the story was the "Disgusting Slobbering Patrick Stewart Groupies," a loose confederation of female Trek fans on Compuserve who swooned over the actor.<br>
3. The "Picard Maneuver" or "PM" was the periodic adjustment Captain Picard made to his uniform. It consists of grasping the coverall on both sides at the waist and jerking it downward.<br>
4. The "EG" was the Enigmatic Gesture. It's described in the official printout as "a gesture resembling shooting an imaginary rubber band. Usually accompanies the command 'Engage'."<br>
5. "SIG" stands for "Special Interest Group." Star Trek discussions were held in the Star Trek SIG of the CompuServe SciFi Forum.<br>
6. The "humanoid male in a wheelchair with a rabbit, a gopher, and a penguin shouting, 'AHEAD WARP ZILLION!!!!!!!!!!!'" refers to a wheelchair-bound Trekkie who was in the comic strip "Bloom County."<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.allspark.net/ssst1.htm" title="allspark.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.allspark.net/ssst1.htm</a> [allspark.net] <br>
<br>
Remember David Gerrold telling his "penguin joke" in about six different installments? Remember Ron Moore and Michael Okuda hanging out with us? Ah yes, those were the days...</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
SSST was written by members of the Compuserve Science Fiction and Fantasy forum from July 23 1989 through August 21 1989 .
2. The " DSPSG " mentioned in the story was the " Disgusting Slobbering Patrick Stewart Groupies , " a loose confederation of female Trek fans on Compuserve who swooned over the actor .
3. The " Picard Maneuver " or " PM " was the periodic adjustment Captain Picard made to his uniform .
It consists of grasping the coverall on both sides at the waist and jerking it downward .
4. The " EG " was the Enigmatic Gesture .
It 's described in the official printout as " a gesture resembling shooting an imaginary rubber band .
Usually accompanies the command 'Engage' .
" 5 .
" SIG " stands for " Special Interest Group .
" Star Trek discussions were held in the Star Trek SIG of the CompuServe SciFi Forum .
6. The " humanoid male in a wheelchair with a rabbit , a gopher , and a penguin shouting , 'AHEAD WARP ZILLION ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
' " refers to a wheelchair-bound Trekkie who was in the comic strip " Bloom County .
" http : //www.allspark.net/ssst1.htm [ allspark.net ] Remember David Gerrold telling his " penguin joke " in about six different installments ?
Remember Ron Moore and Michael Okuda hanging out with us ?
Ah yes , those were the days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
SSST was written by members of the Compuserve Science Fiction and Fantasy forum from July 23 1989 through August 21 1989.
2. The "DSPSG" mentioned in the story was the "Disgusting Slobbering Patrick Stewart Groupies," a loose confederation of female Trek fans on Compuserve who swooned over the actor.
3. The "Picard Maneuver" or "PM" was the periodic adjustment Captain Picard made to his uniform.
It consists of grasping the coverall on both sides at the waist and jerking it downward.
4. The "EG" was the Enigmatic Gesture.
It's described in the official printout as "a gesture resembling shooting an imaginary rubber band.
Usually accompanies the command 'Engage'.
"
5.
"SIG" stands for "Special Interest Group.
" Star Trek discussions were held in the Star Trek SIG of the CompuServe SciFi Forum.
6. The "humanoid male in a wheelchair with a rabbit, a gopher, and a penguin shouting, 'AHEAD WARP ZILLION!!!!!!!!!!!
'" refers to a wheelchair-bound Trekkie who was in the comic strip "Bloom County.
"

http://www.allspark.net/ssst1.htm [allspark.net] 

Remember David Gerrold telling his "penguin joke" in about six different installments?
Remember Ron Moore and Michael Okuda hanging out with us?
Ah yes, those were the days...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581601</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>a9db0</author>
	<datestamp>1246734720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>71052,3331</p><p>Great.  That I can remember, but I can't remember my ATM PIN!</p><p>I still have the CS binder-in-a-book that came with my subscription, and my old OzWin (Anyone else remember that?) logs and email files around.  Last email date: 1998.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>71052,3331Great .
That I can remember , but I ca n't remember my ATM PIN ! I still have the CS binder-in-a-book that came with my subscription , and my old OzWin ( Anyone else remember that ?
) logs and email files around .
Last email date : 1998 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>71052,3331Great.
That I can remember, but I can't remember my ATM PIN!I still have the CS binder-in-a-book that came with my subscription, and my old OzWin (Anyone else remember that?
) logs and email files around.
Last email date: 1998.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582385</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1246700040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know, but we should come up with one. "Go back to the nursing home?"</p></div><p>ITYM "fk U! go bk 2 nrsing hm!!!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but we should come up with one .
" Go back to the nursing home ?
" ITYM " fk U !
go bk 2 nrsing hm ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but we should come up with one.
"Go back to the nursing home?
"ITYM "fk U!
go bk 2 nrsing hm!!!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585553</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1246794060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored, as if you didn't exist.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, you had ceased to exist, to all practical intents and purposes, the moment that you told your OLR to drop all messages To or From a particular UID at the header collecting stage. You'd only see the UIDs go by if you actually watched the terminal session running, as the list of new messages to download was compiled ; then the KILL filter did it's job and the only other sign of the existence of the Damned that you'd see would be if an unDamned person quoted the Damned one.<br>You could filter out that too, if you really wanted to make someone an un-person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored , as if you did n't exist.Well , you had ceased to exist , to all practical intents and purposes , the moment that you told your OLR to drop all messages To or From a particular UID at the header collecting stage .
You 'd only see the UIDs go by if you actually watched the terminal session running , as the list of new messages to download was compiled ; then the KILL filter did it 's job and the only other sign of the existence of the Damned that you 'd see would be if an unDamned person quoted the Damned one.You could filter out that too , if you really wanted to make someone an un-person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Punishment for such offense was to be completely ignored, as if you didn't exist.Well, you had ceased to exist, to all practical intents and purposes, the moment that you told your OLR to drop all messages To or From a particular UID at the header collecting stage.
You'd only see the UIDs go by if you actually watched the terminal session running, as the list of new messages to download was compiled ; then the KILL filter did it's job and the only other sign of the existence of the Damned that you'd see would be if an unDamned person quoted the Damned one.You could filter out that too, if you really wanted to make someone an un-person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581517</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1246734060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still remember my compuserve address... 70324,1777...</p></div><p>Hello, Christian Gross.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still remember my compuserve address... 70324,1777...Hello , Christian Gross .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still remember my compuserve address... 70324,1777...Hello, Christian Gross.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582011</id>
	<title>Re:Prodigy?</title>
	<author>dmarcov</author>
	<datestamp>1246739340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I had a crush on Data and all, but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were.</p></div><p>"Ladies." Right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a crush on Data and all , but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were. " Ladies .
" Right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a crush on Data and all, but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were."Ladies.
" Right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581261</id>
	<title>I still use (receive email on) that address</title>
	<author>CaptainOfSpray</author>
	<datestamp>1246732080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I chose it because you could get connected anywhere on your travels, including countries that had not yet discovered the internet or dial-up connectivity. There was always a node to dial, usually local if you were in a city.

Now there's friendly people all over the planet who know my old Compuserve address, but I don't know their current email address. So I kept that old address long past its close-down-by date, just in case some old friend came out of the mist looking for me. Worked quite a few times, too. I'm glad AOL are allowing the addresses to continue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I chose it because you could get connected anywhere on your travels , including countries that had not yet discovered the internet or dial-up connectivity .
There was always a node to dial , usually local if you were in a city .
Now there 's friendly people all over the planet who know my old Compuserve address , but I do n't know their current email address .
So I kept that old address long past its close-down-by date , just in case some old friend came out of the mist looking for me .
Worked quite a few times , too .
I 'm glad AOL are allowing the addresses to continue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I chose it because you could get connected anywhere on your travels, including countries that had not yet discovered the internet or dial-up connectivity.
There was always a node to dial, usually local if you were in a city.
Now there's friendly people all over the planet who know my old Compuserve address, but I don't know their current email address.
So I kept that old address long past its close-down-by date, just in case some old friend came out of the mist looking for me.
Worked quite a few times, too.
I'm glad AOL are allowing the addresses to continue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586637</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246812660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.tekeeze.com/fun-sites/7-fun-sites-you-can-only-find-on-the-gopher-internet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.tekeeze.com/fun-sites/7-fun-sites-you-can-only-find-on-the-gopher-internet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.tekeeze.com/fun-sites/7-fun-sites-you-can-only-find-on-the-gopher-internet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581363</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>R.Mo\_Robert</author>
	<datestamp>1246732920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article is wrong: AOL isn't shutting down the entirety of CompuServe.</p><p>AOL simulatenously operated both CompuServe 2000 (the AOL-based network) and CompuServe Classic, as it came to be called. AOL isn't "pulling the plug" on the entire company as this summary says; they're merely shutting down the CompuServe Classic service, which they have hardly touched one bit in the last ten years anyway. There are no plans to shut down CompuServe 2000, and users have the option of migrating to this service.</p><p>So, while your comment is mostly on the mark, it's important to note that AOL neither shut down CompuServe when they bought it (they operated Classic simultaneously with the new service for 10 years!), nor are they shutting down the service (CompuServe 2000) to which you refer.</p><p>Also, this was announced in April, so it's hardly news, other than the June 30 shutdown date--which already happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article is wrong : AOL is n't shutting down the entirety of CompuServe.AOL simulatenously operated both CompuServe 2000 ( the AOL-based network ) and CompuServe Classic , as it came to be called .
AOL is n't " pulling the plug " on the entire company as this summary says ; they 're merely shutting down the CompuServe Classic service , which they have hardly touched one bit in the last ten years anyway .
There are no plans to shut down CompuServe 2000 , and users have the option of migrating to this service.So , while your comment is mostly on the mark , it 's important to note that AOL neither shut down CompuServe when they bought it ( they operated Classic simultaneously with the new service for 10 years !
) , nor are they shutting down the service ( CompuServe 2000 ) to which you refer.Also , this was announced in April , so it 's hardly news , other than the June 30 shutdown date--which already happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article is wrong: AOL isn't shutting down the entirety of CompuServe.AOL simulatenously operated both CompuServe 2000 (the AOL-based network) and CompuServe Classic, as it came to be called.
AOL isn't "pulling the plug" on the entire company as this summary says; they're merely shutting down the CompuServe Classic service, which they have hardly touched one bit in the last ten years anyway.
There are no plans to shut down CompuServe 2000, and users have the option of migrating to this service.So, while your comment is mostly on the mark, it's important to note that AOL neither shut down CompuServe when they bought it (they operated Classic simultaneously with the new service for 10 years!
), nor are they shutting down the service (CompuServe 2000) to which you refer.Also, this was announced in April, so it's hardly news, other than the June 30 shutdown date--which already happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582003</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246739340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the "get off my lawn" equivalent for young-&gt;old</p></div><p>"Get off my intarwebs, CAVEMAN OOG!"<br>Or simply end with "old man", if outside<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the " get off my lawn " equivalent for young- &gt; old " Get off my intarwebs , CAVEMAN OOG !
" Or simply end with " old man " , if outside / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the "get off my lawn" equivalent for young-&gt;old"Get off my intarwebs, CAVEMAN OOG!
"Or simply end with "old man", if outside /.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</id>
	<title>Nothing new</title>
	<author>YrWrstNtmr</author>
	<datestamp>1246731420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>AOL shut down Compuserv LONG ago, when they bought it. The only thing that remained was the name. The techy goodness that differentiated CS from the mass appeal of AOL was gone.<br>They even dialed into the same modem bank, with exactly the same phone numbers.<br> <br>[hanging head] Yes, I had an AOL acct and a CS acct at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>AOL shut down Compuserv LONG ago , when they bought it .
The only thing that remained was the name .
The techy goodness that differentiated CS from the mass appeal of AOL was gone.They even dialed into the same modem bank , with exactly the same phone numbers .
[ hanging head ] Yes , I had an AOL acct and a CS acct at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AOL shut down Compuserv LONG ago, when they bought it.
The only thing that remained was the name.
The techy goodness that differentiated CS from the mass appeal of AOL was gone.They even dialed into the same modem bank, with exactly the same phone numbers.
[hanging head] Yes, I had an AOL acct and a CS acct at the same time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581727</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>TheOldBear</author>
	<datestamp>1246735860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>76116,3650<p>

Used to hang out on Will Zachman's <em>Canopus</em> forum, using an off line CI$ agent called 'Golden Compass'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>76116,3650 Used to hang out on Will Zachman 's Canopus forum , using an off line CI $ agent called 'Golden Compass'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>76116,3650

Used to hang out on Will Zachman's Canopus forum, using an off line CI$ agent called 'Golden Compass'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581399</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>Vesperi</author>
	<datestamp>1246733100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AOL wasn't allowed to purchase CompuServe directly, UUNET (really MCI or MFS, can't remember who owned UUNET at the time) bought it then carved off the consumer level accounts and sold it to AOL.   Part of the deal was AOL transferred all the business service accounts and it's dial-up pops to UUNET and they got merged in with the dial-up pops from CS and the existing UUDIAL network.    Then both systems leased POPs access back from UUNET.    After that point most multi-state dial-up ISPs where either reselling UUNET or SPRINT dial pop access and where just content providers rather then actuall ISPs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AOL was n't allowed to purchase CompuServe directly , UUNET ( really MCI or MFS , ca n't remember who owned UUNET at the time ) bought it then carved off the consumer level accounts and sold it to AOL .
Part of the deal was AOL transferred all the business service accounts and it 's dial-up pops to UUNET and they got merged in with the dial-up pops from CS and the existing UUDIAL network .
Then both systems leased POPs access back from UUNET .
After that point most multi-state dial-up ISPs where either reselling UUNET or SPRINT dial pop access and where just content providers rather then actuall ISPs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AOL wasn't allowed to purchase CompuServe directly, UUNET (really MCI or MFS, can't remember who owned UUNET at the time) bought it then carved off the consumer level accounts and sold it to AOL.
Part of the deal was AOL transferred all the business service accounts and it's dial-up pops to UUNET and they got merged in with the dial-up pops from CS and the existing UUDIAL network.
Then both systems leased POPs access back from UUNET.
After that point most multi-state dial-up ISPs where either reselling UUNET or SPRINT dial pop access and where just content providers rather then actuall ISPs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581795</id>
	<title>Ahh CI$</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246736640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back in the days before the Internet, CI$ (Compuserve Information Service) was one of the first nation wide BBS type systems.  It was the place where nationwide online tech support started to become somewhat useful.  I used to logon for Novell downloads and Atari support.  Of course I also pirated the heck out of everything back then.  And I loved their freebie $15 credit thingy they'd include with new modems.  Use that code to start an account, randomly pick name/addr/phone number out of phone book, get a bank routing number, then randomly pick account number.  Tada free Compuserve until they shut it down.  If you did it on a Friday it'd usually last until Monday or tuesday of the following week...  Of course this was pre-18 yrs old for me, and I stopped doing it about that time.   I remember the adult areas on Compuserve.  320x200x256 GIF files!  wohoo!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in the days before the Internet , CI $ ( Compuserve Information Service ) was one of the first nation wide BBS type systems .
It was the place where nationwide online tech support started to become somewhat useful .
I used to logon for Novell downloads and Atari support .
Of course I also pirated the heck out of everything back then .
And I loved their freebie $ 15 credit thingy they 'd include with new modems .
Use that code to start an account , randomly pick name/addr/phone number out of phone book , get a bank routing number , then randomly pick account number .
Tada free Compuserve until they shut it down .
If you did it on a Friday it 'd usually last until Monday or tuesday of the following week... Of course this was pre-18 yrs old for me , and I stopped doing it about that time .
I remember the adult areas on Compuserve .
320x200x256 GIF files !
wohoo ! : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in the days before the Internet, CI$ (Compuserve Information Service) was one of the first nation wide BBS type systems.
It was the place where nationwide online tech support started to become somewhat useful.
I used to logon for Novell downloads and Atari support.
Of course I also pirated the heck out of everything back then.
And I loved their freebie $15 credit thingy they'd include with new modems.
Use that code to start an account, randomly pick name/addr/phone number out of phone book, get a bank routing number, then randomly pick account number.
Tada free Compuserve until they shut it down.
If you did it on a Friday it'd usually last until Monday or tuesday of the following week...  Of course this was pre-18 yrs old for me, and I stopped doing it about that time.
I remember the adult areas on Compuserve.
320x200x256 GIF files!
wohoo! :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581539</id>
	<title>Remember "The Source"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246734300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So any old timers remember, "The Source"?  I used that until its subscriber base got so low you could hear the crickets chirping when you logged on and then switched to CompuServe.</p><p>I remember being on "The Source" around 1984 and chatting with someone in the Middle East.  Really quite "cool" at the time.</p><p>Oh yeah, and my CompuServe ID was 73707,3450 (must have typed that thousands of times until I got TAPCIS to automate downloading).  Out of nolstagia I checked my CompuServe mail once every 6 months for years after I gave up on CompuServe.</p><p>Good memories...</p><p>Of course, now you've got easily accessible on-line porn.  Things are MUCH better now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So any old timers remember , " The Source " ?
I used that until its subscriber base got so low you could hear the crickets chirping when you logged on and then switched to CompuServe.I remember being on " The Source " around 1984 and chatting with someone in the Middle East .
Really quite " cool " at the time.Oh yeah , and my CompuServe ID was 73707,3450 ( must have typed that thousands of times until I got TAPCIS to automate downloading ) .
Out of nolstagia I checked my CompuServe mail once every 6 months for years after I gave up on CompuServe.Good memories...Of course , now you 've got easily accessible on-line porn .
Things are MUCH better now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So any old timers remember, "The Source"?
I used that until its subscriber base got so low you could hear the crickets chirping when you logged on and then switched to CompuServe.I remember being on "The Source" around 1984 and chatting with someone in the Middle East.
Really quite "cool" at the time.Oh yeah, and my CompuServe ID was 73707,3450 (must have typed that thousands of times until I got TAPCIS to automate downloading).
Out of nolstagia I checked my CompuServe mail once every 6 months for years after I gave up on CompuServe.Good memories...Of course, now you've got easily accessible on-line porn.
Things are MUCH better now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581673</id>
	<title>Pay per Hour</title>
	<author>Guru80</author>
	<datestamp>1246735380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember the very very early days of the internet paying for HOURS online...boy that was fun!  But then again it definitely wasn't today's internet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the very very early days of the internet paying for HOURS online...boy that was fun !
But then again it definitely was n't today 's internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the very very early days of the internet paying for HOURS online...boy that was fun!
But then again it definitely wasn't today's internet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586441</id>
	<title>RIP Compuserve</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246810440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>70277,2502 here. RIP Cserve; we hardly knew you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>70277,2502 here .
RIP Cserve ; we hardly knew you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>70277,2502 here.
RIP Cserve; we hardly knew you...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582467</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246700700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Gah, I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net. They were rude, they were shrill and they were legion<br><br>&lt;AOL&gt;Me too!&lt;/AOL&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Gah , I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net .
They were rude , they were shrill and they were legionMe too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Gah, I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.
They were rude, they were shrill and they were legionMe too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583191</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Rand1956</author>
	<datestamp>1246709820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>RIP from 73337,3067 and many, many others -- remember Snap-Paks? -- from 1981 on. And The Source (STZ956), DJNS, Bix, MCIMail, etc., etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RIP from 73337,3067 and many , many others -- remember Snap-Paks ?
-- from 1981 on .
And The Source ( STZ956 ) , DJNS , Bix , MCIMail , etc. , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RIP from 73337,3067 and many, many others -- remember Snap-Paks?
-- from 1981 on.
And The Source (STZ956), DJNS, Bix, MCIMail, etc., etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28589151</id>
	<title>I remember mine, too..</title>
	<author>grolaw</author>
	<datestamp>1246793700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>75176,1350</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>75176,1350</tokentext>
<sentencetext>75176,1350</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</id>
	<title>Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246731240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still remember my compuserve address...  70324,1777...</p><p>I can't for the live of me remember my pins, or phone numbers, but this ancient email address I have remembered to this day...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still remember my compuserve address... 70324,1777...I ca n't for the live of me remember my pins , or phone numbers , but this ancient email address I have remembered to this day.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still remember my compuserve address...  70324,1777...I can't for the live of me remember my pins, or phone numbers, but this ancient email address I have remembered to this day...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246732500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I signed up in 1983 or so, after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem. The CB Simulator was fun.  I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.</p><p>Everyone complained about how expensive Compu$erve was, but we paid the price anyway.  And we liked it that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I signed up in 1983 or so , after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem .
The CB Simulator was fun .
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words , not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.Everyone complained about how expensive Compu $ erve was , but we paid the price anyway .
And we liked it that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I signed up in 1983 or so, after I got my Atari 800 and 300-baud modem.
The CB Simulator was fun.
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.Everyone complained about how expensive Compu$erve was, but we paid the price anyway.
And we liked it that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581391</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246733100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[hanging head] Yes, I had an AOL <b>acct</b> and a CS <b>acct</b> at the same time.</p></div><p>Really?  Who'd a thunk it?<br>This was totally something i wouldn't have been able to guess at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ hanging head ] Yes , I had an AOL acct and a CS acct at the same time.Really ?
Who 'd a thunk it ? This was totally something i would n't have been able to guess at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[hanging head] Yes, I had an AOL acct and a CS acct at the same time.Really?
Who'd a thunk it?This was totally something i wouldn't have been able to guess at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582827</id>
	<title>Re:Good Riddance</title>
	<author>Skater</author>
	<datestamp>1246704960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For what it's worth, the CompuServe I (and many others here, obviously) remember was long before those types of deals came up.  I distinctly remember my dad ordering airline tickets for our family to go to Florida online back in 1984 (using our PCjr wtih a 1200 baud Hayes Smartmodem...I still have the modem, actually), and I'm pretty certain it was through CompuServe's SABRE application/connection/whatever.</p><p>We had CompuServe until about 1986, when we moved to a different part of the state, and we no longer had a local phone number.  GEnie, however, did, so we signed on with that.  I spent some time playing around with it, but of course the hourly fee was annoying to my father.  Eventually I discovered a BBS in the area I could call for free and GEnie went by the wayside.</p><p>If memory serves, the deals you're talking about were in the late-90s/early-2000s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For what it 's worth , the CompuServe I ( and many others here , obviously ) remember was long before those types of deals came up .
I distinctly remember my dad ordering airline tickets for our family to go to Florida online back in 1984 ( using our PCjr wtih a 1200 baud Hayes Smartmodem...I still have the modem , actually ) , and I 'm pretty certain it was through CompuServe 's SABRE application/connection/whatever.We had CompuServe until about 1986 , when we moved to a different part of the state , and we no longer had a local phone number .
GEnie , however , did , so we signed on with that .
I spent some time playing around with it , but of course the hourly fee was annoying to my father .
Eventually I discovered a BBS in the area I could call for free and GEnie went by the wayside.If memory serves , the deals you 're talking about were in the late-90s/early-2000s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For what it's worth, the CompuServe I (and many others here, obviously) remember was long before those types of deals came up.
I distinctly remember my dad ordering airline tickets for our family to go to Florida online back in 1984 (using our PCjr wtih a 1200 baud Hayes Smartmodem...I still have the modem, actually), and I'm pretty certain it was through CompuServe's SABRE application/connection/whatever.We had CompuServe until about 1986, when we moved to a different part of the state, and we no longer had a local phone number.
GEnie, however, did, so we signed on with that.
I spent some time playing around with it, but of course the hourly fee was annoying to my father.
Eventually I discovered a BBS in the area I could call for free and GEnie went by the wayside.If memory serves, the deals you're talking about were in the late-90s/early-2000s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581701</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>k2dbk</author>
	<datestamp>1246735620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Newbie.

I was 70160,306.

And in my day, we really did dial up at 300bps. And liked it, because it was faster than 110.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Newbie .
I was 70160,306 .
And in my day , we really did dial up at 300bps .
And liked it , because it was faster than 110 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newbie.
I was 70160,306.
And in my day, we really did dial up at 300bps.
And liked it, because it was faster than 110.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584589</id>
	<title>System was telnettable til closure</title>
	<author>Hansele</author>
	<datestamp>1246731600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Up until they did this, I was still paying a legacy $2.50/mth fee for Compuserve and my old account could still log in to the service at gateway.compuserve.com via telnet.

You could not do much in there of course anymore, but I was also once a sysop, and I still knew how to get into the PRO area, do directory listings of their hard drives (and see files with dates dating back to the 70&#226;(TM)s), and with that knowledge run some of the old apps from the command line (like biorythms, and some adventure games), and even things like TE2TRN.EXE (the program that allowed the TI-99/4A TE2 cartridge to transfer files from Compuserve.

And of course who could forget the Filge editor?

I used to log in every few months for a little nostalgia, as well as amazement that the old systems were still up this long</htmltext>
<tokenext>Up until they did this , I was still paying a legacy $ 2.50/mth fee for Compuserve and my old account could still log in to the service at gateway.compuserve.com via telnet .
You could not do much in there of course anymore , but I was also once a sysop , and I still knew how to get into the PRO area , do directory listings of their hard drives ( and see files with dates dating back to the 70   ( TM ) s ) , and with that knowledge run some of the old apps from the command line ( like biorythms , and some adventure games ) , and even things like TE2TRN.EXE ( the program that allowed the TI-99/4A TE2 cartridge to transfer files from Compuserve .
And of course who could forget the Filge editor ?
I used to log in every few months for a little nostalgia , as well as amazement that the old systems were still up this long</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Up until they did this, I was still paying a legacy $2.50/mth fee for Compuserve and my old account could still log in to the service at gateway.compuserve.com via telnet.
You could not do much in there of course anymore, but I was also once a sysop, and I still knew how to get into the PRO area, do directory listings of their hard drives (and see files with dates dating back to the 70â(TM)s), and with that knowledge run some of the old apps from the command line (like biorythms, and some adventure games), and even things like TE2TRN.EXE (the program that allowed the TI-99/4A TE2 cartridge to transfer files from Compuserve.
And of course who could forget the Filge editor?
I used to log in every few months for a little nostalgia, as well as amazement that the old systems were still up this long</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582359</id>
	<title>Q-Link</title>
	<author>bwy</author>
	<datestamp>1246699860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was never a Compuserve guy.... but was a member of Q-Link for a while... I know Q-Link pre-dated AOL, but it probably pre-dated Compuserve also?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was never a Compuserve guy.... but was a member of Q-Link for a while... I know Q-Link pre-dated AOL , but it probably pre-dated Compuserve also ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was never a Compuserve guy.... but was a member of Q-Link for a while... I know Q-Link pre-dated AOL, but it probably pre-dated Compuserve also?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581669</id>
	<title>Re:Prodigy?</title>
	<author>SirLurksAlot</author>
	<datestamp>1246735260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Whatever happened to Prodigy?</p></div></blockquote><p>According <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodigy\_(online\_service)#Current\_status" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia's article on Prodigy</a> [wikipedia.org] they were bought out by SBC which in turn turned (back?) into AT&amp;T.  Prodigy.net actually redirects to my.att.net.</p><blockquote><div><p>it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent Spiner</p></div></blockquote><p>Brent Spiner?!  Everyone knows that Jonathan Frakes was the lady killer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever happened to Prodigy ? According Wikipedia 's article on Prodigy [ wikipedia.org ] they were bought out by SBC which in turn turned ( back ?
) into AT&amp;T .
Prodigy.net actually redirects to my.att.net.it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent SpinerBrent Spiner ? !
Everyone knows that Jonathan Frakes was the lady killer : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever happened to Prodigy?According Wikipedia's article on Prodigy [wikipedia.org] they were bought out by SBC which in turn turned (back?
) into AT&amp;T.
Prodigy.net actually redirects to my.att.net.it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent SpinerBrent Spiner?!
Everyone knows that Jonathan Frakes was the lady killer :-P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584051</id>
	<title>Delphi Anyone?</title>
	<author>kullnd</author>
	<datestamp>1246722600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After reading the thread, I am actually kind of surprised that nobody has mentioned Delphi --- I had them for internet access until a local BBS started offering it --- Also had prodigy, but that was a family thing (they also had horrible user names (BMTF00A), and I never used Prodigy when they actually had internet, it was just Prodigy and that was it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading the thread , I am actually kind of surprised that nobody has mentioned Delphi --- I had them for internet access until a local BBS started offering it --- Also had prodigy , but that was a family thing ( they also had horrible user names ( BMTF00A ) , and I never used Prodigy when they actually had internet , it was just Prodigy and that was it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading the thread, I am actually kind of surprised that nobody has mentioned Delphi --- I had them for internet access until a local BBS started offering it --- Also had prodigy, but that was a family thing (they also had horrible user names (BMTF00A), and I never used Prodigy when they actually had internet, it was just Prodigy and that was it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581193</id>
	<title>Time to open a bottle of champagne</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246731720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I kept one just for this day</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I kept one just for this day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kept one just for this day</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581771</id>
	<title>Re:Migrating from CompuServe</title>
	<author>pdcull</author>
	<datestamp>1246736400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recently used a product called CS2OutlookExpress from CS2Exchange to import from WinCim, through Outlook Express, into Outlook 2003. It cost me $25 but worked great and now means that I have my ancient history available once again.

Paul</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently used a product called CS2OutlookExpress from CS2Exchange to import from WinCim , through Outlook Express , into Outlook 2003 .
It cost me $ 25 but worked great and now means that I have my ancient history available once again .
Paul</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently used a product called CS2OutlookExpress from CS2Exchange to import from WinCim, through Outlook Express, into Outlook 2003.
It cost me $25 but worked great and now means that I have my ancient history available once again.
Paul</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28588739</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>rduke15</author>
	<datestamp>1246789560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, OzWin was great. My first "email program" and "news reader" of sorts.</p><p>I must still have the OzWin files somewhere on some backup, but they don't seem to be on my notebook. Had always intended to convert them to mbox-like format, but have never done it.</p><p>The great thing about Compuserve was that they had a dial-in number in just about any country in the world. It was expensive, but I could email in 1990 or so from Africa and Asia by dialing a local number.</p><p>100111,3271</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , OzWin was great .
My first " email program " and " news reader " of sorts.I must still have the OzWin files somewhere on some backup , but they do n't seem to be on my notebook .
Had always intended to convert them to mbox-like format , but have never done it.The great thing about Compuserve was that they had a dial-in number in just about any country in the world .
It was expensive , but I could email in 1990 or so from Africa and Asia by dialing a local number.100111,3271</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, OzWin was great.
My first "email program" and "news reader" of sorts.I must still have the OzWin files somewhere on some backup, but they don't seem to be on my notebook.
Had always intended to convert them to mbox-like format, but have never done it.The great thing about Compuserve was that they had a dial-in number in just about any country in the world.
It was expensive, but I could email in 1990 or so from Africa and Asia by dialing a local number.100111,3271</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582551</id>
	<title>Vic 20</title>
	<author>Haxx</author>
	<datestamp>1246701660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; My first computer was a Radio Shack/Tandy Color Computer II, around 1980-81.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; My Second computer was a Commodore Vic 20, wich I used to connect to compuserve with a 300 baud modem around 1981-82. The one thing I remember most is that Compuserve modelled thier chat rooms after the CB Radio Scene. When AOL came around the chat rooms were much easier to navigate then Compuserve and they never recovered. I didnt spend much time on Compuserve in the '80s because they charged by the hour and being a young teen, I didnt have the money. Trying to explain to my parents that I was using the phone to connect to other computers was a lost cause. After that, the C-64 BBS scene took off and life was never the same. Great Memories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    My first computer was a Radio Shack/Tandy Color Computer II , around 1980-81 .
    My Second computer was a Commodore Vic 20 , wich I used to connect to compuserve with a 300 baud modem around 1981-82 .
The one thing I remember most is that Compuserve modelled thier chat rooms after the CB Radio Scene .
When AOL came around the chat rooms were much easier to navigate then Compuserve and they never recovered .
I didnt spend much time on Compuserve in the '80s because they charged by the hour and being a young teen , I didnt have the money .
Trying to explain to my parents that I was using the phone to connect to other computers was a lost cause .
After that , the C-64 BBS scene took off and life was never the same .
Great Memories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    My first computer was a Radio Shack/Tandy Color Computer II, around 1980-81.
    My Second computer was a Commodore Vic 20, wich I used to connect to compuserve with a 300 baud modem around 1981-82.
The one thing I remember most is that Compuserve modelled thier chat rooms after the CB Radio Scene.
When AOL came around the chat rooms were much easier to navigate then Compuserve and they never recovered.
I didnt spend much time on Compuserve in the '80s because they charged by the hour and being a young teen, I didnt have the money.
Trying to explain to my parents that I was using the phone to connect to other computers was a lost cause.
After that, the C-64 BBS scene took off and life was never the same.
Great Memories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582375</id>
	<title>omg!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246699980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh Dear Lord, nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh Dear Lord , nooooooooooooooooooooo ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh Dear Lord, nooooooooooooooooooooo!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28598885</id>
	<title>Delphi</title>
	<author>krislyn</author>
	<datestamp>1246871340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Online services started to go downhill when Delphi closed up shop.  I remember seeing the Vaxen in a house-turned-into-company in Cambridge, MA, wondering how all those people I talked to fit inside those boxes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Online services started to go downhill when Delphi closed up shop .
I remember seeing the Vaxen in a house-turned-into-company in Cambridge , MA , wondering how all those people I talked to fit inside those boxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Online services started to go downhill when Delphi closed up shop.
I remember seeing the Vaxen in a house-turned-into-company in Cambridge, MA, wondering how all those people I talked to fit inside those boxes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581161</id>
	<title>animated gifs</title>
	<author>g4ry</author>
	<datestamp>1246731420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet the internet will be littered with dancing Jesus for years to come.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet the internet will be littered with dancing Jesus for years to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet the internet will be littered with dancing Jesus for years to come.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581387</id>
	<title>CS censorship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246733040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I canceled my CS account after they overreacted to Bavarian censorship demands. See Risks issues 17.61, 17.62 and other sources</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I canceled my CS account after they overreacted to Bavarian censorship demands .
See Risks issues 17.61 , 17.62 and other sources</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I canceled my CS account after they overreacted to Bavarian censorship demands.
See Risks issues 17.61, 17.62 and other sources</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584181</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246724520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember my 70003 account I had and 111111 account I had when I worked for them.  It was a great time in my life and I'll always remember those days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember my 70003 account I had and 111111 account I had when I worked for them .
It was a great time in my life and I 'll always remember those days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember my 70003 account I had and 111111 account I had when I worked for them.
It was a great time in my life and I'll always remember those days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581587</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>BrittanyGites</author>
	<datestamp>1246734600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if Compuserve was running on DEC hardware with TOPS-10  I remember my University username was [201,108]. Never seen user id like that anywhere else.</p><p>Anyone know ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if Compuserve was running on DEC hardware with TOPS-10 I remember my University username was [ 201,108 ] .
Never seen user id like that anywhere else.Anyone know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if Compuserve was running on DEC hardware with TOPS-10  I remember my University username was [201,108].
Never seen user id like that anywhere else.Anyone know ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581841</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>DenaliPrime</author>
	<datestamp>1246737120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>71451,300 here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>71451,300 here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>71451,300 here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</id>
	<title>Brings back memories</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1246732740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly ironic that Compuserve was around before AOL.  Gah, I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.  They were rude, they were shrill and they were legion.

</p><p>The days you would actually still use a gopher server.

</p><p>We got our first internet connection from the local library.

</p><p>Some admins would actually block AOL users from their web servers.

</p><p>Exciting times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly ironic that Compuserve was around before AOL .
Gah , I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net .
They were rude , they were shrill and they were legion .
The days you would actually still use a gopher server .
We got our first internet connection from the local library .
Some admins would actually block AOL users from their web servers .
Exciting times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly ironic that Compuserve was around before AOL.
Gah, I still remember the days when AOL users first flooded the net.
They were rude, they were shrill and they were legion.
The days you would actually still use a gopher server.
We got our first internet connection from the local library.
Some admins would actually block AOL users from their web servers.
Exciting times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581563</id>
	<title>Flash Forward one year.</title>
	<author>korney</author>
	<datestamp>1246734420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once great AOL, not an intelligent idea or product in sight for years, is finally put out of its misery by Time Warner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once great AOL , not an intelligent idea or product in sight for years , is finally put out of its misery by Time Warner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once great AOL, not an intelligent idea or product in sight for years, is finally put out of its misery by Time Warner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581609</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>retiredtwice</author>
	<datestamp>1246734720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm, 1983 is about when I signed up.    Cant find a record of my old ID and unlike others I have forgotten it.   But an Atari 800 and an acoustic modem is what I used at the time.</p><p>Geez that was a long time ago.   I hadn't thought about it but 26 years is a long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , 1983 is about when I signed up .
Cant find a record of my old ID and unlike others I have forgotten it .
But an Atari 800 and an acoustic modem is what I used at the time.Geez that was a long time ago .
I had n't thought about it but 26 years is a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, 1983 is about when I signed up.
Cant find a record of my old ID and unlike others I have forgotten it.
But an Atari 800 and an acoustic modem is what I used at the time.Geez that was a long time ago.
I hadn't thought about it but 26 years is a long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582923</id>
	<title>HSX</title>
	<author>gibbled</author>
	<datestamp>1246706160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GO HSX was always good for an interesting read.</p><p>73657,3626</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GO HSX was always good for an interesting read.73657,3626</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GO HSX was always good for an interesting read.73657,3626</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584341</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1246726620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would block? We don't block from web servers anymore, we just black hole their address blocks whenever possible!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would block ?
We do n't block from web servers anymore , we just black hole their address blocks whenever possible !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would block?
We don't block from web servers anymore, we just black hole their address blocks whenever possible!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582333</id>
	<title>Re:Hey gramps</title>
	<author>Savior\_on\_a\_Stick</author>
	<datestamp>1246699560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just remember - just because we've taught you everything you know -<br>that doesn't mean we've taught you everything *we* know...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just remember - just because we 've taught you everything you know -that does n't mean we 've taught you everything * we * know.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just remember - just because we've taught you everything you know -that doesn't mean we've taught you everything *we* know...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581247</id>
	<title>Anyone remember Cubby v. CompuServe?</title>
	<author>Meshach</author>
	<datestamp>1246732020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The case of Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. was one of the first of it kind and set an important precedent for online BBS.  In that case CompuServe was sued because they hosted a BBS where defamatory content was posted.  The court rules that although CompuServe provided the medium they were not responsible for the content (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubby\_v.\_CompuServe).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The case of Cubby , Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. was one of the first of it kind and set an important precedent for online BBS .
In that case CompuServe was sued because they hosted a BBS where defamatory content was posted .
The court rules that although CompuServe provided the medium they were not responsible for the content ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubby \ _v. \ _CompuServe ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The case of Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. was one of the first of it kind and set an important precedent for online BBS.
In that case CompuServe was sued because they hosted a BBS where defamatory content was posted.
The court rules that although CompuServe provided the medium they were not responsible for the content (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubby\_v.\_CompuServe).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581807</id>
	<title>Re:Good Riddance</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1246736760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every dial-up service and PC mfg that pulled this trick made it to my "never-buy-from-them" list.  Aren't all the dial-up services that tried this trick now dead or mostly dead?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every dial-up service and PC mfg that pulled this trick made it to my " never-buy-from-them " list .
Are n't all the dial-up services that tried this trick now dead or mostly dead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every dial-up service and PC mfg that pulled this trick made it to my "never-buy-from-them" list.
Aren't all the dial-up services that tried this trick now dead or mostly dead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28595009</id>
	<title>I remember...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1246898040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had frequented some BBSes before, but CompuServe was my first connection service, circa 1988.</p><p>One of the more memorable things about that time was using a paper clip to toggle dip switches on a 300 baud modem to set the port.</p><p>Another thing was seeing commercials on TV for it, and Prodigy. My, how things have changed over the years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had frequented some BBSes before , but CompuServe was my first connection service , circa 1988.One of the more memorable things about that time was using a paper clip to toggle dip switches on a 300 baud modem to set the port.Another thing was seeing commercials on TV for it , and Prodigy .
My , how things have changed over the years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had frequented some BBSes before, but CompuServe was my first connection service, circa 1988.One of the more memorable things about that time was using a paper clip to toggle dip switches on a 300 baud modem to set the port.Another thing was seeing commercials on TV for it, and Prodigy.
My, how things have changed over the years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581359</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>JCZwart</author>
	<datestamp>1246732920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember a relative bought a modem back in the days. It came with 2 diskettes (anyone still remember what that were?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) ). One labeled 'Compuserve' (IIRC), and the other one containing the communication apps. I seem to remember reading the user's manual of Kermit, and not understanding a single word of it. Of course, I would understand things right now - thanks to the right amount of experience and a degree in IT. And thanks to things now being handled by the appropriate communication drivers.<br>
<br>
The BBS'es of that time of course looked like nothing compared to the internet of now. I do remember they featured 'graphics', though. Ah, the secret joys of viewing big blobs of ASCII art - in no more than 16 colors, for those lucky enough to own an EGA monitor!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a relative bought a modem back in the days .
It came with 2 diskettes ( anyone still remember what that were ?
; ) ) .
One labeled 'Compuserve ' ( IIRC ) , and the other one containing the communication apps .
I seem to remember reading the user 's manual of Kermit , and not understanding a single word of it .
Of course , I would understand things right now - thanks to the right amount of experience and a degree in IT .
And thanks to things now being handled by the appropriate communication drivers .
The BBS'es of that time of course looked like nothing compared to the internet of now .
I do remember they featured 'graphics ' , though .
Ah , the secret joys of viewing big blobs of ASCII art - in no more than 16 colors , for those lucky enough to own an EGA monitor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a relative bought a modem back in the days.
It came with 2 diskettes (anyone still remember what that were?
;) ).
One labeled 'Compuserve' (IIRC), and the other one containing the communication apps.
I seem to remember reading the user's manual of Kermit, and not understanding a single word of it.
Of course, I would understand things right now - thanks to the right amount of experience and a degree in IT.
And thanks to things now being handled by the appropriate communication drivers.
The BBS'es of that time of course looked like nothing compared to the internet of now.
I do remember they featured 'graphics', though.
Ah, the secret joys of viewing big blobs of ASCII art - in no more than 16 colors, for those lucky enough to own an EGA monitor!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</id>
	<title>Prodigy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246734720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever happened to Prodigy? That was my first internet service. I remember my excitement at finding their ST:TNG message board... and chagrin at discovering that it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent Spiner. I mean, I had a crush on Data and all, but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever happened to Prodigy ?
That was my first internet service .
I remember my excitement at finding their ST : TNG message board... and chagrin at discovering that it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent Spiner .
I mean , I had a crush on Data and all , but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever happened to Prodigy?
That was my first internet service.
I remember my excitement at finding their ST:TNG message board... and chagrin at discovering that it was mostly full of middle-aged women having fantasies about Brent Spiner.
I mean, I had a crush on Data and all, but at 14 I was definitely not interested in a 45-year-old actor in the same way these ladies were.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584815</id>
	<title>fifteen minutes per megabyte</title>
	<author>Douglas Goodall</author>
	<datestamp>1246736340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I remember about the compuserve era was 28.8 modems and serious delays when downloading. Nowdays my Internet connection is 1000 times faster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I remember about the compuserve era was 28.8 modems and serious delays when downloading .
Nowdays my Internet connection is 1000 times faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I remember about the compuserve era was 28.8 modems and serious delays when downloading.
Nowdays my Internet connection is 1000 times faster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583165</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1246709460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't remember my ID. I was a long time subscriber and frequented the C64 area which was run by some user group. They got into some argument with Compuserve and removed all their content. I dumped Compuserve and never heard of user group again. I don't remember which service I picked up after that. I did at one time run a BBS in the DC Metro area that used a C64 and several drives. The BBS was written by a 15 yr old kid whose name escapes me. After I moved back to Indiana I frequented fidonet and then slowly started picking up usenet via UUCP and had an internet address gated through the fidonet system. Then Fidonet went all central control and the internet mostly has killed it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't remember my ID .
I was a long time subscriber and frequented the C64 area which was run by some user group .
They got into some argument with Compuserve and removed all their content .
I dumped Compuserve and never heard of user group again .
I do n't remember which service I picked up after that .
I did at one time run a BBS in the DC Metro area that used a C64 and several drives .
The BBS was written by a 15 yr old kid whose name escapes me .
After I moved back to Indiana I frequented fidonet and then slowly started picking up usenet via UUCP and had an internet address gated through the fidonet system .
Then Fidonet went all central control and the internet mostly has killed it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't remember my ID.
I was a long time subscriber and frequented the C64 area which was run by some user group.
They got into some argument with Compuserve and removed all their content.
I dumped Compuserve and never heard of user group again.
I don't remember which service I picked up after that.
I did at one time run a BBS in the DC Metro area that used a C64 and several drives.
The BBS was written by a 15 yr old kid whose name escapes me.
After I moved back to Indiana I frequented fidonet and then slowly started picking up usenet via UUCP and had an internet address gated through the fidonet system.
Then Fidonet went all central control and the internet mostly has killed it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582751</id>
	<title>Re:The one thing I hope to forget one day...</title>
	<author>symbolic</author>
	<datestamp>1246703940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is the $300-$400 monthly bills for all the time spent using the CB Simulator. That was addictive, but man those bills hurt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is the $ 300- $ 400 monthly bills for all the time spent using the CB Simulator .
That was addictive , but man those bills hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the $300-$400 monthly bills for all the time spent using the CB Simulator.
That was addictive, but man those bills hurt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585131</id>
	<title>Re:Brings back memories</title>
	<author>mcnoch</author>
	<datestamp>1246786140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, memories...

As 10043,3005 I was not only one of the first subscribers when CS became available here in Germany, but unfortunately I was playing on the dark-side too, feeding the 3,5" disc spitting AOL-monster. I was one of those beta-testers for the German off-spring of AOL, BOL (Bertelsmann Online) later to be named AOL Germany and even further down the road for CS 2000. I helped to open the floodgate for the German "me-too"s of that time. I was young and needed the money and the free internet access, instead of paying 4.95 US$ for one hour with a 9600 Baud connection or 2.95 US$ for a 2400 Baud connection. Sorry!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , memories.. . As 10043,3005 I was not only one of the first subscribers when CS became available here in Germany , but unfortunately I was playing on the dark-side too , feeding the 3,5 " disc spitting AOL-monster .
I was one of those beta-testers for the German off-spring of AOL , BOL ( Bertelsmann Online ) later to be named AOL Germany and even further down the road for CS 2000 .
I helped to open the floodgate for the German " me-too " s of that time .
I was young and needed the money and the free internet access , instead of paying 4.95 US $ for one hour with a 9600 Baud connection or 2.95 US $ for a 2400 Baud connection .
Sorry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, memories...

As 10043,3005 I was not only one of the first subscribers when CS became available here in Germany, but unfortunately I was playing on the dark-side too, feeding the 3,5" disc spitting AOL-monster.
I was one of those beta-testers for the German off-spring of AOL, BOL (Bertelsmann Online) later to be named AOL Germany and even further down the road for CS 2000.
I helped to open the floodgate for the German "me-too"s of that time.
I was young and needed the money and the free internet access, instead of paying 4.95 US$ for one hour with a 9600 Baud connection or 2.95 US$ for a 2400 Baud connection.
Sorry!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582207</id>
	<title>Re:Prodigy?</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1246698240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whatever happened to Prodigy?</p></div><p>They had a pretty big hit in the 90s that got banned from MTV "Smack my Bitch Up."  They're still recording as far as I know, but that was definitely their high point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever happened to Prodigy ? They had a pretty big hit in the 90s that got banned from MTV " Smack my Bitch Up .
" They 're still recording as far as I know , but that was definitely their high point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever happened to Prodigy?They had a pretty big hit in the 90s that got banned from MTV "Smack my Bitch Up.
"  They're still recording as far as I know, but that was definitely their high point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581975</id>
	<title>Re:Good Riddance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246738860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm surprised AOL allowed them to continue this long.<br>I remember my two brothers constantly being bumped from AOL in the middle of a an IM, which is why to this day I refuse to have anything to do with them.<br>I signed on with cs early on when the rather large package was I believe $25. stayed with them until freewwweb and the others came about, when net zero was also free.<br>I still refuse to deal with AOL. I used to use their im service as it was the only one but as soon as Yahoo came online I dumped them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised AOL allowed them to continue this long.I remember my two brothers constantly being bumped from AOL in the middle of a an IM , which is why to this day I refuse to have anything to do with them.I signed on with cs early on when the rather large package was I believe $ 25 .
stayed with them until freewwweb and the others came about , when net zero was also free.I still refuse to deal with AOL .
I used to use their im service as it was the only one but as soon as Yahoo came online I dumped them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised AOL allowed them to continue this long.I remember my two brothers constantly being bumped from AOL in the middle of a an IM, which is why to this day I refuse to have anything to do with them.I signed on with cs early on when the rather large package was I believe $25.
stayed with them until freewwweb and the others came about, when net zero was also free.I still refuse to deal with AOL.
I used to use their im service as it was the only one but as soon as Yahoo came online I dumped them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581607</id>
	<title>New email system?</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1246734720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic (as the service was renamed) addresses at no charge via a new <b>e-mail system</b></p> </div><p>
That'll never catch on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic ( as the service was renamed ) addresses at no charge via a new e-mail system That 'll never catch on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CompuServe users will be able to use their existing CompuServe Classic (as the service was renamed) addresses at no charge via a new e-mail system 
That'll never catch on.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581451</id>
	<title>It was still up ?!</title>
	<author>DiSKiLLeR</author>
	<datestamp>1246733580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compuserve was shut down? It was still up!?</p><p>Those of us who live outside of the US are vaguely aware of its existance...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compuserve was shut down ?
It was still up !
? Those of us who live outside of the US are vaguely aware of its existance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compuserve was shut down?
It was still up!
?Those of us who live outside of the US are vaguely aware of its existance...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581591</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246734660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's even worse now than it was back on the elite BBSs of the late 80s. There used to be an unspoken ruleset for elite case. Consonants were upper case, vowels were lower case, zero was a lower case o. Nobody substituted numbers for letters, except for the zero. Some people used extended ASCII as character replacement, but they were more creative about it back then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's even worse now than it was back on the elite BBSs of the late 80s .
There used to be an unspoken ruleset for elite case .
Consonants were upper case , vowels were lower case , zero was a lower case o. Nobody substituted numbers for letters , except for the zero .
Some people used extended ASCII as character replacement , but they were more creative about it back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's even worse now than it was back on the elite BBSs of the late 80s.
There used to be an unspoken ruleset for elite case.
Consonants were upper case, vowels were lower case, zero was a lower case o. Nobody substituted numbers for letters, except for the zero.
Some people used extended ASCII as character replacement, but they were more creative about it back then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581445</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1246733520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Allow me to be the first to say... Compuserve still existed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Allow me to be the first to say... Compuserve still existed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allow me to be the first to say... Compuserve still existed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583667</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>kallen3</author>
	<datestamp>1246715820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had compuserv too but preferred The Source. First introduction to internet which was still referred to as DARPA net in places</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had compuserv too but preferred The Source .
First introduction to internet which was still referred to as DARPA net in places</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had compuserv too but preferred The Source.
First introduction to internet which was still referred to as DARPA net in places</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582649</id>
	<title>Re:Signed up in 1987</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1246702920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The CB Simulator was fun. I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.</p></div><p>FWIW, the illiterate drivel spewed by fucktards on YouTube comments and the like is the bastard offspring of years of txt mssging cntrctions (or at least strongly gives the impression of having come from there), compounded by not giving a toss.<br> <br>
Though 13375p34k might appear superficially similar to the uninitiated, and probably overlaps it in some areas, it's not really the same thing. Unlike the thriving text-messaging-derived drivel, genuine (non-ironic) use of actual 13375p34k seems to have disappeared from the face of the net fairly suddenly around three years back. Probably because it stopped being obscure fun and became passe when newspapers started publishing guides to those weird messages your children were typing.<br> <br>
(I've heard some people claim that 13375p34k originated as a way of getting around textual filters, and other people rebut this origin claiming they saw early use of such language long ago when that wasn't an issue. I don't know, personally.)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Everyone complained about how expensive Compu$erve was, but we paid the price anyway. And we liked it that way.</p></div><p>I remembered reading about Compuserve and similar services long before the Internet became popular, and I'd have loved to give it a go, but it looked *horrendously* expensive. (Something like 25p to 50p a minute at late-80s UK prices IIRC).<br> <br>
There wasn't even a snowball's chance in hell of me being able to afford it on my pocket money, or even my parents probably.<br> <br>
I know you were half-joking, but in all seriousness, if you could afford Compuserve- even if it hurt a bit- you or your family must have been reasonably well-off. But you'll excuse me if I don't get *too* nostalgic for a proprietary service whose price put it out of the league of the majority of ordinary people when- for all its well-documented flaws- the Internet offers so much more at a fraction of the cost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CB Simulator was fun .
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words , not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.FWIW , the illiterate drivel spewed by fucktards on YouTube comments and the like is the bastard offspring of years of txt mssging cntrctions ( or at least strongly gives the impression of having come from there ) , compounded by not giving a toss .
Though 13375p34k might appear superficially similar to the uninitiated , and probably overlaps it in some areas , it 's not really the same thing .
Unlike the thriving text-messaging-derived drivel , genuine ( non-ironic ) use of actual 13375p34k seems to have disappeared from the face of the net fairly suddenly around three years back .
Probably because it stopped being obscure fun and became passe when newspapers started publishing guides to those weird messages your children were typing .
( I 've heard some people claim that 13375p34k originated as a way of getting around textual filters , and other people rebut this origin claiming they saw early use of such language long ago when that was n't an issue .
I do n't know , personally .
) Everyone complained about how expensive Compu $ erve was , but we paid the price anyway .
And we liked it that way.I remembered reading about Compuserve and similar services long before the Internet became popular , and I 'd have loved to give it a go , but it looked * horrendously * expensive .
( Something like 25p to 50p a minute at late-80s UK prices IIRC ) .
There was n't even a snowball 's chance in hell of me being able to afford it on my pocket money , or even my parents probably .
I know you were half-joking , but in all seriousness , if you could afford Compuserve- even if it hurt a bit- you or your family must have been reasonably well-off .
But you 'll excuse me if I do n't get * too * nostalgic for a proprietary service whose price put it out of the league of the majority of ordinary people when- for all its well-documented flaws- the Internet offers so much more at a fraction of the cost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CB Simulator was fun.
I still remember fondly that people back then typed complete sentences and words, not like the ch475p33k crap that passes for communication these days.FWIW, the illiterate drivel spewed by fucktards on YouTube comments and the like is the bastard offspring of years of txt mssging cntrctions (or at least strongly gives the impression of having come from there), compounded by not giving a toss.
Though 13375p34k might appear superficially similar to the uninitiated, and probably overlaps it in some areas, it's not really the same thing.
Unlike the thriving text-messaging-derived drivel, genuine (non-ironic) use of actual 13375p34k seems to have disappeared from the face of the net fairly suddenly around three years back.
Probably because it stopped being obscure fun and became passe when newspapers started publishing guides to those weird messages your children were typing.
(I've heard some people claim that 13375p34k originated as a way of getting around textual filters, and other people rebut this origin claiming they saw early use of such language long ago when that wasn't an issue.
I don't know, personally.
)Everyone complained about how expensive Compu$erve was, but we paid the price anyway.
And we liked it that way.I remembered reading about Compuserve and similar services long before the Internet became popular, and I'd have loved to give it a go, but it looked *horrendously* expensive.
(Something like 25p to 50p a minute at late-80s UK prices IIRC).
There wasn't even a snowball's chance in hell of me being able to afford it on my pocket money, or even my parents probably.
I know you were half-joking, but in all seriousness, if you could afford Compuserve- even if it hurt a bit- you or your family must have been reasonably well-off.
But you'll excuse me if I don't get *too* nostalgic for a proprietary service whose price put it out of the league of the majority of ordinary people when- for all its well-documented flaws- the Internet offers so much more at a fraction of the cost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581731</id>
	<title>103151,517</title>
	<author>kurt555gs</author>
	<datestamp>1246735860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to spend a fortune with them. I also used to go into Worlds Away through compuserve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to spend a fortune with them .
I also used to go into Worlds Away through compuserve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to spend a fortune with them.
I also used to go into Worlds Away through compuserve.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581259</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246732080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>72677,464.</p><p>We all remember.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>72677,464.We all remember .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>72677,464.We all remember.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581459</id>
	<title>Re:Wow this is a day...</title>
	<author>samkass</author>
	<datestamp>1246733580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>72127,3114</p><p>I was also on GEnie, but ironically don't remember my login there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>72127,3114I was also on GEnie , but ironically do n't remember my login there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>72127,3114I was also on GEnie, but ironically don't remember my login there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581819</id>
	<title>Dead? Dead companies don't charge $17.95/month.</title>
	<author>trygstad</author>
	<datestamp>1246736880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gee, if you go to cs.com you can sign up to Compuserve with unlimited Internet access for the discounted rate of $17.95/month. Does not look like a dead company to me; it looks like a company requiring their clients to migrate to newer software (CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2 to Compuserve 7.0, which BTW is only 8 years old!). This sounds like such complete non-news...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gee , if you go to cs.com you can sign up to Compuserve with unlimited Internet access for the discounted rate of $ 17.95/month .
Does not look like a dead company to me ; it looks like a company requiring their clients to migrate to newer software ( CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2 to Compuserve 7.0 , which BTW is only 8 years old ! ) .
This sounds like such complete non-news.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gee, if you go to cs.com you can sign up to Compuserve with unlimited Internet access for the discounted rate of $17.95/month.
Does not look like a dead company to me; it looks like a company requiring their clients to migrate to newer software (CompuServe for Windows NT 4.0.2 to Compuserve 7.0, which BTW is only 8 years old!).
This sounds like such complete non-news...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583329</id>
	<title>Ah Thus Closes One of the Circles of Internet Hell</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1246711800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those of you who've forgotten, there were three circles.
<p>
Compuserve was the highest circle. The most clueful of the CompuServe users might one day escape to the Internet. The rest were doomed to pay by the hour.</p><p>
AOL was the middle circle. The most clueful might one day escape to CompuServe. The rest were doomed to the short bus.</p><p>
Prodigy was the lowest level of Internet Hell. The most clueful Prodigy users... well it's not entirely clear that anyone ever actually <i>used</i> prodigy. Someone must have because IBM did support on their forums and I drew the short straw the week the usual guy who did it went on vacation. The other services, IBM automatically pulled down and converted to their internal forum format but they couldn't do that with Prodigy, so we had to connect to Prodigy via their big play-doh client and pathetic speeds (Even for the time) and ridiculous character limits to messages. The truly damned resided in Prodigy, and I bear witness to those events like some sort of Internet Dante.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you who 've forgotten , there were three circles .
Compuserve was the highest circle .
The most clueful of the CompuServe users might one day escape to the Internet .
The rest were doomed to pay by the hour .
AOL was the middle circle .
The most clueful might one day escape to CompuServe .
The rest were doomed to the short bus .
Prodigy was the lowest level of Internet Hell .
The most clueful Prodigy users... well it 's not entirely clear that anyone ever actually used prodigy .
Someone must have because IBM did support on their forums and I drew the short straw the week the usual guy who did it went on vacation .
The other services , IBM automatically pulled down and converted to their internal forum format but they could n't do that with Prodigy , so we had to connect to Prodigy via their big play-doh client and pathetic speeds ( Even for the time ) and ridiculous character limits to messages .
The truly damned resided in Prodigy , and I bear witness to those events like some sort of Internet Dante .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you who've forgotten, there were three circles.
Compuserve was the highest circle.
The most clueful of the CompuServe users might one day escape to the Internet.
The rest were doomed to pay by the hour.
AOL was the middle circle.
The most clueful might one day escape to CompuServe.
The rest were doomed to the short bus.
Prodigy was the lowest level of Internet Hell.
The most clueful Prodigy users... well it's not entirely clear that anyone ever actually used prodigy.
Someone must have because IBM did support on their forums and I drew the short straw the week the usual guy who did it went on vacation.
The other services, IBM automatically pulled down and converted to their internal forum format but they couldn't do that with Prodigy, so we had to connect to Prodigy via their big play-doh client and pathetic speeds (Even for the time) and ridiculous character limits to messages.
The truly damned resided in Prodigy, and I bear witness to those events like some sort of Internet Dante.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581745</id>
	<title>Re:Good Riddance</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1246736040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember them a long time ago. Around 1992 I got a <a href="http://www.8bit-micro.com/images/tandy102a.jpg" title="8bit-micro.com">Tandy 102 portable computer</a> [8bit-micro.com] which included a 300 baud modem and a free trial for CompuServe (you can probably see where this is going...). Being able to download programs very slowly (the screen scrolling reduced the effective speed to well under 100 characters per second) was cool. Having my parents question me about a $50 bill a couple of months later wasn't. Needless to say, I wasn't a member very long.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember them a long time ago .
Around 1992 I got a Tandy 102 portable computer [ 8bit-micro.com ] which included a 300 baud modem and a free trial for CompuServe ( you can probably see where this is going... ) .
Being able to download programs very slowly ( the screen scrolling reduced the effective speed to well under 100 characters per second ) was cool .
Having my parents question me about a $ 50 bill a couple of months later was n't .
Needless to say , I was n't a member very long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember them a long time ago.
Around 1992 I got a Tandy 102 portable computer [8bit-micro.com] which included a 300 baud modem and a free trial for CompuServe (you can probably see where this is going...).
Being able to download programs very slowly (the screen scrolling reduced the effective speed to well under 100 characters per second) was cool.
Having my parents question me about a $50 bill a couple of months later wasn't.
Needless to say, I wasn't a member very long.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583979</id>
	<title>Cracked Compuserve Accounts..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246721100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compuserve accounts was the best way to access the internet for a few years in the beginning...<br>They thought anything which looked like a valid CC was a valid CC until they actually tried to charge it after a month..<br>Good times.</p><p>Nowdays when the internet actually is accessable this kind of suspect behaviour is ofcourse frowned upon<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compuserve accounts was the best way to access the internet for a few years in the beginning...They thought anything which looked like a valid CC was a valid CC until they actually tried to charge it after a month..Good times.Nowdays when the internet actually is accessable this kind of suspect behaviour is ofcourse frowned upon ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compuserve accounts was the best way to access the internet for a few years in the beginning...They thought anything which looked like a valid CC was a valid CC until they actually tried to charge it after a month..Good times.Nowdays when the internet actually is accessable this kind of suspect behaviour is ofcourse frowned upon ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28594061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28587639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28588739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_04_169220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581247
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581319
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581609
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581455
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583209
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585553
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581359
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582359
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581387
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581727
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28588739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581587
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581395
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581467
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582385
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28583857
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584549
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582333
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581459
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28587639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584663
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28594061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582767
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28586637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28585131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582467
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_04_169220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28584463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28582751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_04_169220.28581771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
