<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_03_2232256</id>
	<title>Amazon Wants Patent For Inserting Ads Into Books</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246622520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:theodp@aol.com" rel="nofollow">theodp</a> writes <i>"Three Amazon inventors set out to correct what they felt was a real problem: that 'out-of-print or rare books ... typically do not include advertisements ... the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing.' Their solution is spelled out in newly-disclosed Amazon patent applications for <a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220090171751\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090171751&amp;RS=DN/20090171751">On-Demand Generating E-Book Content with Advertising</a> and <a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=\%2220090171750\%22.PGNR.&amp;OS=DN/20090171750&amp;RS=DN/20090171750">Incorporating Advertising in On-Demand Generated Content</a>. From the patent apps, here's what the future of reading may look like: 'For instance, if a restaurant is described on page 12, [then the advertising page], either on page 11 or page 13, may include advertisements about restaurants, wine, food, etc., which are related to restaurants and dining.' So, what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200906/hemingway">Hemingway</a> experience?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Three Amazon inventors set out to correct what they felt was a real problem : that 'out-of-print or rare books ... typically do not include advertisements ... the content is fixed and , therefore , has not been adapted to modern marketing .
' Their solution is spelled out in newly-disclosed Amazon patent applications for On-Demand Generating E-Book Content with Advertising and Incorporating Advertising in On-Demand Generated Content .
From the patent apps , here 's what the future of reading may look like : 'For instance , if a restaurant is described on page 12 , [ then the advertising page ] , either on page 11 or page 13 , may include advertisements about restaurants , wine , food , etc. , which are related to restaurants and dining .
' So , what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your Hemingway experience ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Three Amazon inventors set out to correct what they felt was a real problem: that 'out-of-print or rare books ... typically do not include advertisements ... the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing.
' Their solution is spelled out in newly-disclosed Amazon patent applications for On-Demand Generating E-Book Content with Advertising and Incorporating Advertising in On-Demand Generated Content.
From the patent apps, here's what the future of reading may look like: 'For instance, if a restaurant is described on page 12, [then the advertising page], either on page 11 or page 13, may include advertisements about restaurants, wine, food, etc., which are related to restaurants and dining.
' So, what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your Hemingway experience?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576467</id>
	<title>Commong soon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246627440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To a Kindle near you</htmltext>
<tokenext>To a Kindle near you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To a Kindle near you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580147</id>
	<title>Re:If it's actually tasteful, I wouldn't mind so m</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1246722840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I wouldn't mind a tasteful, text-only add in its own table that doesn't interrupt the flow of the text I'm reading."<br> <br>

I would.  Books are the last advertisement-free stronghold, the last place we can turn for entertainment that does not come loaded with advertisements.  There is no possible way to place a tasteful ad in a book, and the concept should be immediately dropped.  Honestly, how greedy can these publishers get?<br> <br>

I will not buy a single book from any publisher that engages in this practice (unless it is a used copy without ads).</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I would n't mind a tasteful , text-only add in its own table that does n't interrupt the flow of the text I 'm reading .
" I would .
Books are the last advertisement-free stronghold , the last place we can turn for entertainment that does not come loaded with advertisements .
There is no possible way to place a tasteful ad in a book , and the concept should be immediately dropped .
Honestly , how greedy can these publishers get ?
I will not buy a single book from any publisher that engages in this practice ( unless it is a used copy without ads ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I wouldn't mind a tasteful, text-only add in its own table that doesn't interrupt the flow of the text I'm reading.
" 

I would.
Books are the last advertisement-free stronghold, the last place we can turn for entertainment that does not come loaded with advertisements.
There is no possible way to place a tasteful ad in a book, and the concept should be immediately dropped.
Honestly, how greedy can these publishers get?
I will not buy a single book from any publisher that engages in this practice (unless it is a used copy without ads).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</id>
	<title>Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1246628580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased. I'm sorry Amazon. Blow it out your ass. I'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased .
I 'm sorry Amazon .
Blow it out your ass .
I 'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased.
I'm sorry Amazon.
Blow it out your ass.
I'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576999</id>
	<title>Re:Google itself can't find relevant ads for class</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246633680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in "The Pit and the Pendulum."</p></div><p>Zoloft.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in " The Pit and the Pendulum .
" Zoloft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in "The Pit and the Pendulum.
"Zoloft.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1246628400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is no different than cable TV.  I pay x dollars a month just to watch via cable.  But then I still get advertisements thrown in.  I get ads between "scenes", I get ads that are product placements, and then, imho the worst are those that the channel overlays some animation in the corner.</p><p>So changing "Bob goes into his local restaurant for a greasy cheeseburger" to "Bob goes into TGIFridays for their Super Texan Bacon Burger" is only one step.  Most of the books I own have blank margins.  Why not put a few ads in there?  At the end of a chapter, if the chapter ends with a partial page, why not just put a 1/2 page ad there?  I'd love to see, "STIHL Chainsaws present, Chapter 6 in Stephen King's new thriller..."</p><p>My phonebook has a section in the middle with coupons, why not inject a few pages of coupons into the next Harry Potter book?  I'm sure all the teenagers reading it could benefit from the acne cream ads.</p><p>I always thought that most people today that read Stephen King's Christine had no idea what a 1958 Plymouth Fury looked like.  So maybe they should update it to be a 2008 Toyota Prius.  Now while the Prius doesn't evoke fear due to it's toothy chrome grille or tension with it's low rumbling demon-like engine.  I'm sure someone would be scared of being sneaked up on by a hybrid.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is no different than cable TV .
I pay x dollars a month just to watch via cable .
But then I still get advertisements thrown in .
I get ads between " scenes " , I get ads that are product placements , and then , imho the worst are those that the channel overlays some animation in the corner.So changing " Bob goes into his local restaurant for a greasy cheeseburger " to " Bob goes into TGIFridays for their Super Texan Bacon Burger " is only one step .
Most of the books I own have blank margins .
Why not put a few ads in there ?
At the end of a chapter , if the chapter ends with a partial page , why not just put a 1/2 page ad there ?
I 'd love to see , " STIHL Chainsaws present , Chapter 6 in Stephen King 's new thriller... " My phonebook has a section in the middle with coupons , why not inject a few pages of coupons into the next Harry Potter book ?
I 'm sure all the teenagers reading it could benefit from the acne cream ads.I always thought that most people today that read Stephen King 's Christine had no idea what a 1958 Plymouth Fury looked like .
So maybe they should update it to be a 2008 Toyota Prius .
Now while the Prius does n't evoke fear due to it 's toothy chrome grille or tension with it 's low rumbling demon-like engine .
I 'm sure someone would be scared of being sneaked up on by a hybrid .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is no different than cable TV.
I pay x dollars a month just to watch via cable.
But then I still get advertisements thrown in.
I get ads between "scenes", I get ads that are product placements, and then, imho the worst are those that the channel overlays some animation in the corner.So changing "Bob goes into his local restaurant for a greasy cheeseburger" to "Bob goes into TGIFridays for their Super Texan Bacon Burger" is only one step.
Most of the books I own have blank margins.
Why not put a few ads in there?
At the end of a chapter, if the chapter ends with a partial page, why not just put a 1/2 page ad there?
I'd love to see, "STIHL Chainsaws present, Chapter 6 in Stephen King's new thriller..."My phonebook has a section in the middle with coupons, why not inject a few pages of coupons into the next Harry Potter book?
I'm sure all the teenagers reading it could benefit from the acne cream ads.I always thought that most people today that read Stephen King's Christine had no idea what a 1958 Plymouth Fury looked like.
So maybe they should update it to be a 2008 Toyota Prius.
Now while the Prius doesn't evoke fear due to it's toothy chrome grille or tension with it's low rumbling demon-like engine.
I'm sure someone would be scared of being sneaked up on by a hybrid.
   </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578653</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246699260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope. They are not for free. Who do you think pays the money that Google wants for those ads? You, when you buy the product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
They are not for free .
Who do you think pays the money that Google wants for those ads ?
You , when you buy the product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
They are not for free.
Who do you think pays the money that Google wants for those ads?
You, when you buy the product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576741</id>
	<title>Oh Yeah?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246630200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for filtering book (and book advertiser) content through human decision-making processes.</p></div><p>I claim MY patent for "a method of monopolizing obvious ideas for which there is lots of prior art by means of convincing the Patent Office that the same old idea, when done with a computer, is somehow radically different and worthy of being treated like a new and innovative invention."
<br> <br>
The way I see it, I should make billions.  BILLIONS!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for filtering book ( and book advertiser ) content through human decision-making processes.I claim MY patent for " a method of monopolizing obvious ideas for which there is lots of prior art by means of convincing the Patent Office that the same old idea , when done with a computer , is somehow radically different and worthy of being treated like a new and innovative invention .
" The way I see it , I should make billions .
BILLIONS ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... for filtering book (and book advertiser) content through human decision-making processes.I claim MY patent for "a method of monopolizing obvious ideas for which there is lots of prior art by means of convincing the Patent Office that the same old idea, when done with a computer, is somehow radically different and worthy of being treated like a new and innovative invention.
"
 
The way I see it, I should make billions.
BILLIONS!!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576975</id>
	<title>What's the difference</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1246633140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they have a good explanation of the difference between a magazine and a book, because non-fixed media magazines with changing ads are incredibly common.  Of course, I've read several <a href="http://www.webscription.net/10.1125/Baen/0743435885/0743435885.htm" title="webscription.net">books online with ads in them</a> [webscription.net] also, so either way, the prior art in this is massive and common.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they have a good explanation of the difference between a magazine and a book , because non-fixed media magazines with changing ads are incredibly common .
Of course , I 've read several books online with ads in them [ webscription.net ] also , so either way , the prior art in this is massive and common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they have a good explanation of the difference between a magazine and a book, because non-fixed media magazines with changing ads are incredibly common.
Of course, I've read several books online with ads in them [webscription.net] also, so either way, the prior art in this is massive and common.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577427</id>
	<title>oops my kindle just fell into the trash..</title>
	<author>strangeattraction</author>
	<datestamp>1246638660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I'm not getting it out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'm not getting it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'm not getting it out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576597</id>
	<title>Re:Let them patent it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246628520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yah.  Let them use patent law to stick ads in books, and then the pissed-off authors can use copyright law to stop them from creating unlicensed "derivative" works.</p><p>Oh, and can I be the first to patent a technology for automatically spraying perfume onto ads in romance novels?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yah .
Let them use patent law to stick ads in books , and then the pissed-off authors can use copyright law to stop them from creating unlicensed " derivative " works.Oh , and can I be the first to patent a technology for automatically spraying perfume onto ads in romance novels ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yah.
Let them use patent law to stick ads in books, and then the pissed-off authors can use copyright law to stop them from creating unlicensed "derivative" works.Oh, and can I be the first to patent a technology for automatically spraying perfume onto ads in romance novels?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576877</id>
	<title>Yet another reason ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246631580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... not to pay $500 for a Kindle DX, then even more for the content. Fuck you, Amazon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... not to pay $ 500 for a Kindle DX , then even more for the content .
Fuck you , Amazon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... not to pay $500 for a Kindle DX, then even more for the content.
Fuck you, Amazon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578467</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>uzytkownik</author>
	<datestamp>1246739760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Except it doesn't work like that with ads. You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads. You can pay $50 for Battlefield 1942, or you can pay $50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads.

Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.)</p></div></blockquote><p>

Are you actually say that the whole microeconomics and theory of firm is actually not working?
Why would producers be not willing to produce until the stop point - i.e. until the marginal costs are equal to marginal income? Putting ad would increase a bit a cost but making the bigger income (it maks income you said) would move the stop point to left - i.e. increse output and therefore supply. If they don't want the others will be happy to enter the market with increased profits.

You might argue that ads have negative value for consumers. But we can split the following reasoning in two parts:
- Consumer are indifferent with regard to advertisment. Therfore demand stays the same and supply increase. Basicly it means that price decreased.
- Cosumers percive the ads as having negative utility for them. Therefore demand fall which means that price dropped more then in first case (quantity may increase or drop depending on elasticity etc.)
In each case price falled.

It is very easy to say that "Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products" - but probably it is much harder to prove it.

PS. Please note that all above reasoning have used in ceteris paribus conditions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except it does n't work like that with ads .
You can watch public television for free and get ads , or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads .
You can pay $ 50 for Battlefield 1942 , or you can pay $ 50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads .
Ads increase profit for companies , they never decrease the price of products , except those offered for free ( like Google .
) Are you actually say that the whole microeconomics and theory of firm is actually not working ?
Why would producers be not willing to produce until the stop point - i.e .
until the marginal costs are equal to marginal income ?
Putting ad would increase a bit a cost but making the bigger income ( it maks income you said ) would move the stop point to left - i.e .
increse output and therefore supply .
If they do n't want the others will be happy to enter the market with increased profits .
You might argue that ads have negative value for consumers .
But we can split the following reasoning in two parts : - Consumer are indifferent with regard to advertisment .
Therfore demand stays the same and supply increase .
Basicly it means that price decreased .
- Cosumers percive the ads as having negative utility for them .
Therefore demand fall which means that price dropped more then in first case ( quantity may increase or drop depending on elasticity etc .
) In each case price falled .
It is very easy to say that " Ads increase profit for companies , they never decrease the price of products " - but probably it is much harder to prove it .
PS. Please note that all above reasoning have used in ceteris paribus conditions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except it doesn't work like that with ads.
You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads.
You can pay $50 for Battlefield 1942, or you can pay $50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads.
Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.
)

Are you actually say that the whole microeconomics and theory of firm is actually not working?
Why would producers be not willing to produce until the stop point - i.e.
until the marginal costs are equal to marginal income?
Putting ad would increase a bit a cost but making the bigger income (it maks income you said) would move the stop point to left - i.e.
increse output and therefore supply.
If they don't want the others will be happy to enter the market with increased profits.
You might argue that ads have negative value for consumers.
But we can split the following reasoning in two parts:
- Consumer are indifferent with regard to advertisment.
Therfore demand stays the same and supply increase.
Basicly it means that price decreased.
- Cosumers percive the ads as having negative utility for them.
Therefore demand fall which means that price dropped more then in first case (quantity may increase or drop depending on elasticity etc.
)
In each case price falled.
It is very easy to say that "Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products" - but probably it is much harder to prove it.
PS. Please note that all above reasoning have used in ceteris paribus conditions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28582605</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>bigngamer92</author>
	<datestamp>1246702440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd agree with you.  If only I didn't realize that the price of digital books would remain the same.  They didn't go down with digital distribution and they won't go down with Chipotle ads in the margins.  The only thing that will go down is the enjoyment to cost ratio, and the purchased books to pirated books ratio.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd agree with you .
If only I did n't realize that the price of digital books would remain the same .
They did n't go down with digital distribution and they wo n't go down with Chipotle ads in the margins .
The only thing that will go down is the enjoyment to cost ratio , and the purchased books to pirated books ratio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd agree with you.
If only I didn't realize that the price of digital books would remain the same.
They didn't go down with digital distribution and they won't go down with Chipotle ads in the margins.
The only thing that will go down is the enjoyment to cost ratio, and the purchased books to pirated books ratio.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578107</id>
	<title>Wonderful!</title>
	<author>fluch</author>
	<datestamp>1246647480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more reason not to jump onto the e-book hype!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) (Not that I hadn't had enough reasons already.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more reason not to jump onto the e-book hype !
; - ) ( Not that I had n't had enough reasons already .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more reason not to jump onto the e-book hype!
;-) (Not that I hadn't had enough reasons already.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</id>
	<title>How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246626240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is totally pointless. I mean, if you already paid for the book, why should there have to be ads? Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is totally pointless .
I mean , if you already paid for the book , why should there have to be ads ?
Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is totally pointless.
I mean, if you already paid for the book, why should there have to be ads?
Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578813</id>
	<title>Re:Ads in books?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246702140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://gigapedia.com/" title="gigapedia.com" rel="nofollow">gigapedia</a> [gigapedia.com] offers links to 300000 ebooks, for "free" ahem<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>gigapedia [ gigapedia.com ] offers links to 300000 ebooks , for " free " ahem ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gigapedia [gigapedia.com] offers links to 300000 ebooks, for "free" ahem ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576661</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Adrian Lopez</author>
	<datestamp>1246629240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of "paying twice". It's not that you're being asked to pay again, it's that you didn't fully "pay" the first time. It'd be like buying a $10 product and paying $5 up-front, and having the other $5 paid by advertising it shows.</p></div></blockquote><p>The vast majority of books do not include such advertisements, but the publishers do still turn a profit. It's not like with magazines, where the costs of a print run are typically higher than revenue from subscription fees. With books, you're usually paying for the costs of printing the book and an extra amount on top. Thus, the idea that you aren't paying for the book in full is simply false. The ads are just extra profit for the publisher.</p><p>It's greed coupled with a total disregard for the artistic integrity of a work.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of " paying twice " .
It 's not that you 're being asked to pay again , it 's that you did n't fully " pay " the first time .
It 'd be like buying a $ 10 product and paying $ 5 up-front , and having the other $ 5 paid by advertising it shows.The vast majority of books do not include such advertisements , but the publishers do still turn a profit .
It 's not like with magazines , where the costs of a print run are typically higher than revenue from subscription fees .
With books , you 're usually paying for the costs of printing the book and an extra amount on top .
Thus , the idea that you are n't paying for the book in full is simply false .
The ads are just extra profit for the publisher.It 's greed coupled with a total disregard for the artistic integrity of a work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of "paying twice".
It's not that you're being asked to pay again, it's that you didn't fully "pay" the first time.
It'd be like buying a $10 product and paying $5 up-front, and having the other $5 paid by advertising it shows.The vast majority of books do not include such advertisements, but the publishers do still turn a profit.
It's not like with magazines, where the costs of a print run are typically higher than revenue from subscription fees.
With books, you're usually paying for the costs of printing the book and an extra amount on top.
Thus, the idea that you aren't paying for the book in full is simply false.
The ads are just extra profit for the publisher.It's greed coupled with a total disregard for the artistic integrity of a work.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577549</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246640340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll be one of the first noobs there, gobbling up free books full of ads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll be one of the first noobs there , gobbling up free books full of ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll be one of the first noobs there, gobbling up free books full of ads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578937</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246705200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, sadly this only means that Amazon will get royalties when all the other publishers decide to get on the bandwagon.</p><p>Hopefully some authors will boycott it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , sadly this only means that Amazon will get royalties when all the other publishers decide to get on the bandwagon.Hopefully some authors will boycott it : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, sadly this only means that Amazon will get royalties when all the other publishers decide to get on the bandwagon.Hopefully some authors will boycott it :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577481</id>
	<title>I'm Glad</title>
	<author>BarryHaworth</author>
	<datestamp>1246639200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is wonderful news.  If Amazon holds the patent of inserting ads into e-books, then that means no one else will be allowed to.

<p>
Doesn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is wonderful news .
If Amazon holds the patent of inserting ads into e-books , then that means no one else will be allowed to .
Does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is wonderful news.
If Amazon holds the patent of inserting ads into e-books, then that means no one else will be allowed to.
Doesn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576329</id>
	<title>This was their plan all along</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246626240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I TRUSTED THE KINDLE!! Oh what a fool i am. capsssss</htmltext>
<tokenext>I TRUSTED THE KINDLE ! !
Oh what a fool i am .
capsssss</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I TRUSTED THE KINDLE!!
Oh what a fool i am.
capsssss</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576983</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Golddess</author>
	<datestamp>1246633440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch <b>even more channels than you can get OVA</b> and get ads <b>except on the premium channels where you really are paying for the content and not <i>just</i> the delivery of it</b>.</p></div><p>FTFY.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can watch public television for free and get ads , or you can pay money to watch even more channels than you can get OVA and get ads except on the premium channels where you really are paying for the content and not just the delivery of it.FTFY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch even more channels than you can get OVA and get ads except on the premium channels where you really are paying for the content and not just the delivery of it.FTFY.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580953</id>
	<title>Award them the patent ...</title>
	<author>Old97</author>
	<datestamp>1246729800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and make it very broad so no other company will be able to pollute texts lest they violate Amazon's patent rights.  Then I can shop for e-books from anyone but Amazon knowing the other vendors can't impose this "invention" on me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and make it very broad so no other company will be able to pollute texts lest they violate Amazon 's patent rights .
Then I can shop for e-books from anyone but Amazon knowing the other vendors ca n't impose this " invention " on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and make it very broad so no other company will be able to pollute texts lest they violate Amazon's patent rights.
Then I can shop for e-books from anyone but Amazon knowing the other vendors can't impose this "invention" on me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576997</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't we just start burning Amazon marketers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't we just start burning Amazon marketers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't we just start burning Amazon marketers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579251</id>
	<title>Re:Old Idea</title>
	<author>gnupun</author>
	<datestamp>1246711740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did get a patent for another obvious idea? Web pages are similar to e-books -- both have formatted text and images. Web pages have had ads since forever. Why is it innovative to stick ads in ebooks?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did get a patent for another obvious idea ?
Web pages are similar to e-books -- both have formatted text and images .
Web pages have had ads since forever .
Why is it innovative to stick ads in ebooks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did get a patent for another obvious idea?
Web pages are similar to e-books -- both have formatted text and images.
Web pages have had ads since forever.
Why is it innovative to stick ads in ebooks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576563</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576441</id>
	<title>Hold your horses</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1246627200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Calm down, and let us enumerate its qualities in regard to novelty and usefulness.
</p><p>
Go ahead, you clowns first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Calm down , and let us enumerate its qualities in regard to novelty and usefulness .
Go ahead , you clowns first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Calm down, and let us enumerate its qualities in regard to novelty and usefulness.
Go ahead, you clowns first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576487</id>
	<title>Great Minds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246627560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It honestly makes me weep just a little for our future that this is the best that the greatest minds over at Amazon can come up with - let's basically repackage a technique that has been around for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. since publishing printed material<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and be smart enough to convince patent attorneys that it's been significantly altered such as to warrant legitimate consideration for being granted a patent. Honestly they should be ashamed and monumentally embarrassed of themselves!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It honestly makes me weep just a little for our future that this is the best that the greatest minds over at Amazon can come up with - let 's basically repackage a technique that has been around for ... well .. since publishing printed material ... and be smart enough to convince patent attorneys that it 's been significantly altered such as to warrant legitimate consideration for being granted a patent .
Honestly they should be ashamed and monumentally embarrassed of themselves !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It honestly makes me weep just a little for our future that this is the best that the greatest minds over at Amazon can come up with - let's basically repackage a technique that has been around for ... well .. since publishing printed material ... and be smart enough to convince patent attorneys that it's been significantly altered such as to warrant legitimate consideration for being granted a patent.
Honestly they should be ashamed and monumentally embarrassed of themselves!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576875</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>ljw1004</author>
	<datestamp>1246631580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We will get to pay a third slice, when amazon licenses its patent to other parties and they increase their costs correspondingly!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We will get to pay a third slice , when amazon licenses its patent to other parties and they increase their costs correspondingly !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We will get to pay a third slice, when amazon licenses its patent to other parties and they increase their costs correspondingly!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28587785</id>
	<title>What would ads in an ebook to do for me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246824780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ensure that I never purchase an ebook....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ensure that I never purchase an ebook... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ensure that I never purchase an ebook....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576607</id>
	<title>I claim my own patent...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246628640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for filtering book (and book advertiser) content through human decision-making processes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... for filtering book ( and book advertiser ) content through human decision-making processes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... for filtering book (and book advertiser) content through human decision-making processes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578737</id>
	<title>Re:If it's actually tasteful, I wouldn't mind so m</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246700820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck off, you moronic twat.</p><p>If you were trying to be funny, take the above sentence as a funny comment. If it helps, shout it out as you read it. Americans seem to think shouted abuse is hilarious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck off , you moronic twat.If you were trying to be funny , take the above sentence as a funny comment .
If it helps , shout it out as you read it .
Americans seem to think shouted abuse is hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck off, you moronic twat.If you were trying to be funny, take the above sentence as a funny comment.
If it helps, shout it out as you read it.
Americans seem to think shouted abuse is hilarious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580425</id>
	<title>Amazon just lost a Kindle customer</title>
	<author>ORgal</author>
	<datestamp>1246725480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I'm going to pay for the ebook plus the downloads, I'm not going to pay for their friggin' ads. I'll patronize my local library or buy books and do without Kindle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm going to pay for the ebook plus the downloads , I 'm not going to pay for their friggin ' ads .
I 'll patronize my local library or buy books and do without Kindle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm going to pay for the ebook plus the downloads, I'm not going to pay for their friggin' ads.
I'll patronize my local library or buy books and do without Kindle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577191</id>
	<title>Finally, a patent I can get behind.</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1246636260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, it's a stupid patent.  Sure, it merely applies existing general techniques to a specific domain they were already applicable to.  But as far as I'm concerned, Amazon can have this patent and have it forever.  Then I'll know if I get e-books from a competitor, there won't be any stinking ads in them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , it 's a stupid patent .
Sure , it merely applies existing general techniques to a specific domain they were already applicable to .
But as far as I 'm concerned , Amazon can have this patent and have it forever .
Then I 'll know if I get e-books from a competitor , there wo n't be any stinking ads in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, it's a stupid patent.
Sure, it merely applies existing general techniques to a specific domain they were already applicable to.
But as far as I'm concerned, Amazon can have this patent and have it forever.
Then I'll know if I get e-books from a competitor, there won't be any stinking ads in them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578295</id>
	<title>Better idea</title>
	<author>SilverJets</author>
	<datestamp>1246650600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about putting ads inside ads?   Take a look at an ad, any ad.   Open a magazine and look at an ad.  Look at all that space in there.  Plenty of room to jam another ad right in the middle.  TV?  Sure, lots of space to cram another ad inside an ad.  Use picture in picture.   Heck, you could cover the first ad entirely with other ads using picture in picture and depending on the size of each extra ad I bet that you would more than double your money!  Radio?  Heck yeah. Lot's of space.   Just cram the words for another ad into the spaces between the words of the first ad.  The possibilities are endless!</p><p>Ads inside ads.  I'm running to the patent office right now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about putting ads inside ads ?
Take a look at an ad , any ad .
Open a magazine and look at an ad .
Look at all that space in there .
Plenty of room to jam another ad right in the middle .
TV ? Sure , lots of space to cram another ad inside an ad .
Use picture in picture .
Heck , you could cover the first ad entirely with other ads using picture in picture and depending on the size of each extra ad I bet that you would more than double your money !
Radio ? Heck yeah .
Lot 's of space .
Just cram the words for another ad into the spaces between the words of the first ad .
The possibilities are endless ! Ads inside ads .
I 'm running to the patent office right now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about putting ads inside ads?
Take a look at an ad, any ad.
Open a magazine and look at an ad.
Look at all that space in there.
Plenty of room to jam another ad right in the middle.
TV?  Sure, lots of space to cram another ad inside an ad.
Use picture in picture.
Heck, you could cover the first ad entirely with other ads using picture in picture and depending on the size of each extra ad I bet that you would more than double your money!
Radio?  Heck yeah.
Lot's of space.
Just cram the words for another ad into the spaces between the words of the first ad.
The possibilities are endless!Ads inside ads.
I'm running to the patent office right now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576841</id>
	<title>Books already have ads in them</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1246631400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Open your every day pulp fiction novel.  Go to the back of the book.  You'll see ads there for other books from the same publisher.  Sometimes they are ads for books from the same author you just read, sometimes they are ads for similar genre books.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Open your every day pulp fiction novel .
Go to the back of the book .
You 'll see ads there for other books from the same publisher .
Sometimes they are ads for books from the same author you just read , sometimes they are ads for similar genre books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open your every day pulp fiction novel.
Go to the back of the book.
You'll see ads there for other books from the same publisher.
Sometimes they are ads for books from the same author you just read, sometimes they are ads for similar genre books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576473</id>
	<title>Very telling ...</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1246627500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing.</p></div></blockquote><p>So to them a book is nothing more than a marketing instrument.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the content is fixed and , therefore , has not been adapted to modern marketing.So to them a book is nothing more than a marketing instrument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the content is fixed and, therefore, has not been adapted to modern marketing.So to them a book is nothing more than a marketing instrument.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576397</id>
	<title>Why are we still doing this?</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1246626900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason why patents, such as this fine example, exist is simple. It's so fucking retarded that whenever you want to argue against it you don't even know where to begin. Mark my words, soon you'll read a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article saying that breathing oxygen has been patented, and that you'll have to pay royalties in order to exercise it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason why patents , such as this fine example , exist is simple .
It 's so fucking retarded that whenever you want to argue against it you do n't even know where to begin .
Mark my words , soon you 'll read a / .
article saying that breathing oxygen has been patented , and that you 'll have to pay royalties in order to exercise it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason why patents, such as this fine example, exist is simple.
It's so fucking retarded that whenever you want to argue against it you don't even know where to begin.
Mark my words, soon you'll read a /.
article saying that breathing oxygen has been patented, and that you'll have to pay royalties in order to exercise it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576463</id>
	<title>Sick of ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246627440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am so sick of ads. Just yesterday I swore off using youtube, what with all their ads overlaid on top of videos now.</p><p>I also recently compared the same exact video on hulu (which has ads) to itunes. The video from itunes was much, much better (sharper, better framerate) and no ads. Hulu video was complete crap  -  now way I could stand watching that. I'll gladly pay a reasonable price for a superior product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am so sick of ads .
Just yesterday I swore off using youtube , what with all their ads overlaid on top of videos now.I also recently compared the same exact video on hulu ( which has ads ) to itunes .
The video from itunes was much , much better ( sharper , better framerate ) and no ads .
Hulu video was complete crap - now way I could stand watching that .
I 'll gladly pay a reasonable price for a superior product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am so sick of ads.
Just yesterday I swore off using youtube, what with all their ads overlaid on top of videos now.I also recently compared the same exact video on hulu (which has ads) to itunes.
The video from itunes was much, much better (sharper, better framerate) and no ads.
Hulu video was complete crap  -  now way I could stand watching that.
I'll gladly pay a reasonable price for a superior product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581217</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1246731840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That aside, isn't this patent a good thing? It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.</p></div><p>So - who's the target of that patent?  What company is offering old books without any fees, getting their revenues from advertisement instead? </p><p>
If Google ever gets a deal with copyright owners, where you can read material for "free", with context ads at the end of chapters or every so often, Amazon is going to send out their lawyers, just like they did with their one-click patent.
</p><p>
And yes, users might not accept text ads in literature. But their is a huge non-fiction market.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That aside , is n't this patent a good thing ?
It means that only Amazon 's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.So - who 's the target of that patent ?
What company is offering old books without any fees , getting their revenues from advertisement instead ?
If Google ever gets a deal with copyright owners , where you can read material for " free " , with context ads at the end of chapters or every so often , Amazon is going to send out their lawyers , just like they did with their one-click patent .
And yes , users might not accept text ads in literature .
But their is a huge non-fiction market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That aside, isn't this patent a good thing?
It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.So - who's the target of that patent?
What company is offering old books without any fees, getting their revenues from advertisement instead?
If Google ever gets a deal with copyright owners, where you can read material for "free", with context ads at the end of chapters or every so often, Amazon is going to send out their lawyers, just like they did with their one-click patent.
And yes, users might not accept text ads in literature.
But their is a huge non-fiction market.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577401</id>
	<title>Re:Hold your horses</title>
	<author>Grail</author>
	<datestamp>1246638420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This certainly makes it easier for future anthropologists to study the interrelationships between contemporary reading habits and popularity of certain franchises. And think of the possibilities for collectors!</p><p>"Here we have a copy of Arthur C Clarke's 2001, print-by-demand in 2010. Note that most references to space are accompanied by real estate ads? Here in 2015 after the move by the USA from 'war on drugs' to 'harm minimisation', note how most of the references to space, and especially the iconic scene 'Oh my God! It's full of stars' are accompanied by ads for detox clinics? This was obviously a pivotal time in the culture of that country."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This certainly makes it easier for future anthropologists to study the interrelationships between contemporary reading habits and popularity of certain franchises .
And think of the possibilities for collectors !
" Here we have a copy of Arthur C Clarke 's 2001 , print-by-demand in 2010 .
Note that most references to space are accompanied by real estate ads ?
Here in 2015 after the move by the USA from 'war on drugs ' to 'harm minimisation ' , note how most of the references to space , and especially the iconic scene 'Oh my God !
It 's full of stars ' are accompanied by ads for detox clinics ?
This was obviously a pivotal time in the culture of that country .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This certainly makes it easier for future anthropologists to study the interrelationships between contemporary reading habits and popularity of certain franchises.
And think of the possibilities for collectors!
"Here we have a copy of Arthur C Clarke's 2001, print-by-demand in 2010.
Note that most references to space are accompanied by real estate ads?
Here in 2015 after the move by the USA from 'war on drugs' to 'harm minimisation', note how most of the references to space, and especially the iconic scene 'Oh my God!
It's full of stars' are accompanied by ads for detox clinics?
This was obviously a pivotal time in the culture of that country.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576441</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576995</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To me, if it gets out-of-print and rare books back into circulation (e.g. the stuff I can't currently get, because no one can be arsed to scan the original text into a computer) I'm perfectly fine with it.  There are a handful of books where I've had to go through great lengths and pay quite a bit more than the original cover price to get a used copy.  If ads provide incentive for publishing companies to keep their old out-of-print books available online, fine. I can flip over a few pages (preferably at the beginning or end - interrupting readers in the middle of a chapter with ads is asking for rage).</p><p>There are tons of books out there that the copyright hasn't run out on (fuck you Mickey Mouse) but no one is currently bothering to make available because of the effort involved in going digital and the lack of a known market for a reprint of the physical version.  It's a bit of a tragedy since many of those books are still very relevant to their subject matter.</p><p>For new books it doesn't quite make as much sense to me - they are already electronic, no incentive needed to perform the conversion to digital - it's done.  Put the ads on the page you're selling it from (Amazon's recommendations are amazingly effective ads IMHO, and I don't find those annoying), and if there's not enough market for a physical reprint leave it in the Kindle archives and/or have it available as print-on-demand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To me , if it gets out-of-print and rare books back into circulation ( e.g .
the stuff I ca n't currently get , because no one can be arsed to scan the original text into a computer ) I 'm perfectly fine with it .
There are a handful of books where I 've had to go through great lengths and pay quite a bit more than the original cover price to get a used copy .
If ads provide incentive for publishing companies to keep their old out-of-print books available online , fine .
I can flip over a few pages ( preferably at the beginning or end - interrupting readers in the middle of a chapter with ads is asking for rage ) .There are tons of books out there that the copyright has n't run out on ( fuck you Mickey Mouse ) but no one is currently bothering to make available because of the effort involved in going digital and the lack of a known market for a reprint of the physical version .
It 's a bit of a tragedy since many of those books are still very relevant to their subject matter.For new books it does n't quite make as much sense to me - they are already electronic , no incentive needed to perform the conversion to digital - it 's done .
Put the ads on the page you 're selling it from ( Amazon 's recommendations are amazingly effective ads IMHO , and I do n't find those annoying ) , and if there 's not enough market for a physical reprint leave it in the Kindle archives and/or have it available as print-on-demand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me, if it gets out-of-print and rare books back into circulation (e.g.
the stuff I can't currently get, because no one can be arsed to scan the original text into a computer) I'm perfectly fine with it.
There are a handful of books where I've had to go through great lengths and pay quite a bit more than the original cover price to get a used copy.
If ads provide incentive for publishing companies to keep their old out-of-print books available online, fine.
I can flip over a few pages (preferably at the beginning or end - interrupting readers in the middle of a chapter with ads is asking for rage).There are tons of books out there that the copyright hasn't run out on (fuck you Mickey Mouse) but no one is currently bothering to make available because of the effort involved in going digital and the lack of a known market for a reprint of the physical version.
It's a bit of a tragedy since many of those books are still very relevant to their subject matter.For new books it doesn't quite make as much sense to me - they are already electronic, no incentive needed to perform the conversion to digital - it's done.
Put the ads on the page you're selling it from (Amazon's recommendations are amazingly effective ads IMHO, and I don't find those annoying), and if there's not enough market for a physical reprint leave it in the Kindle archives and/or have it available as print-on-demand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Garbad Ropedink</author>
	<datestamp>1246628040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.</p><p>Good god, why not just stick ads in all the old works? I'm sure Picasso would have put a coke machine in Guernica if he knew how cool and refreshing it was....<br>'I painted this to protest the lack of coca-cola in my homeland. It will be returned to Spain when there is a coke machine on every corner'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.Good god , why not just stick ads in all the old works ?
I 'm sure Picasso would have put a coke machine in Guernica if he knew how cool and refreshing it was....'I painted this to protest the lack of coca-cola in my homeland .
It will be returned to Spain when there is a coke machine on every corner'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.Good god, why not just stick ads in all the old works?
I'm sure Picasso would have put a coke machine in Guernica if he knew how cool and refreshing it was....'I painted this to protest the lack of coca-cola in my homeland.
It will be returned to Spain when there is a coke machine on every corner'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577125</id>
	<title>Re:If it's actually tasteful, I wouldn't mind so m</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246635120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. People get their panties in a bunch over the idea of in-program ads in TV shows (rather than between them), or ads in books, or wherever they aren't already, but a lot of the old shows from the beginning of broadcast television had actors or their characters do amusing and sometimes even witty product placements. More recently, I've seen things like Arrested Development's Burger King endorsements in an episode where it was so ridiculous that I wondered if it was actually a sponsorship or a satire of a sponsorship.
<br> <br>
It's not the fact of having ads that's bad, it's how they're done. Personally, if Arrested Development had to do multiple sponsorships per show but it would have saved the from cancellation, I would have told them to go for it. (I'm looking forward to the movie, but much of what makes it such a great show comes from its masterful use of the serial format of TV.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
People get their panties in a bunch over the idea of in-program ads in TV shows ( rather than between them ) , or ads in books , or wherever they are n't already , but a lot of the old shows from the beginning of broadcast television had actors or their characters do amusing and sometimes even witty product placements .
More recently , I 've seen things like Arrested Development 's Burger King endorsements in an episode where it was so ridiculous that I wondered if it was actually a sponsorship or a satire of a sponsorship .
It 's not the fact of having ads that 's bad , it 's how they 're done .
Personally , if Arrested Development had to do multiple sponsorships per show but it would have saved the from cancellation , I would have told them to go for it .
( I 'm looking forward to the movie , but much of what makes it such a great show comes from its masterful use of the serial format of TV .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
People get their panties in a bunch over the idea of in-program ads in TV shows (rather than between them), or ads in books, or wherever they aren't already, but a lot of the old shows from the beginning of broadcast television had actors or their characters do amusing and sometimes even witty product placements.
More recently, I've seen things like Arrested Development's Burger King endorsements in an episode where it was so ridiculous that I wondered if it was actually a sponsorship or a satire of a sponsorship.
It's not the fact of having ads that's bad, it's how they're done.
Personally, if Arrested Development had to do multiple sponsorships per show but it would have saved the from cancellation, I would have told them to go for it.
(I'm looking forward to the movie, but much of what makes it such a great show comes from its masterful use of the serial format of TV.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>shoemilk</author>
	<datestamp>1246626960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because they are greedy. Why stop there? Why not insert the name of the restaurant into the text? Auto replace "restaurant" with "Chili's". Does the main character put on a coat? Why not make it an Armani coat? Does she take a sip of water? Spice up that water to your brand soft drink for a small fee! Why stop there? Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target."<br> <br>Seriously, though if I wanted ads breaking up what I was reading, I'd buy a newspaper. But I don't so I'll never buy one of those books or a newspaper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they are greedy .
Why stop there ?
Why not insert the name of the restaurant into the text ?
Auto replace " restaurant " with " Chili 's " .
Does the main character put on a coat ?
Why not make it an Armani coat ?
Does she take a sip of water ?
Spice up that water to your brand soft drink for a small fee !
Why stop there ?
Let sponsors have characters " As Captain 'Pizza Hut ' Ahab looked out over the sea , he saw her , Moby Dick , brought to you by Target .
" Seriously , though if I wanted ads breaking up what I was reading , I 'd buy a newspaper .
But I do n't so I 'll never buy one of those books or a newspaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they are greedy.
Why stop there?
Why not insert the name of the restaurant into the text?
Auto replace "restaurant" with "Chili's".
Does the main character put on a coat?
Why not make it an Armani coat?
Does she take a sip of water?
Spice up that water to your brand soft drink for a small fee!
Why stop there?
Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target.
" Seriously, though if I wanted ads breaking up what I was reading, I'd buy a newspaper.
But I don't so I'll never buy one of those books or a newspaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576679</id>
	<title>Patent?</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1246629420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Patent" my ass. What <i>I</i> would like to send them is a bag of burning dog shit on their front porch for even <i>suggesting</i> such an idea! It seems that every day we really are coming closer and closer to the insane world of the movie <i>Idiocracy</i>; these bastards want to put fucking advertisements on bloody <i>everything</i>! Them, them, fuck them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Patent " my ass .
What I would like to send them is a bag of burning dog shit on their front porch for even suggesting such an idea !
It seems that every day we really are coming closer and closer to the insane world of the movie Idiocracy ; these bastards want to put fucking advertisements on bloody everything !
Them , them , fuck them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Patent" my ass.
What I would like to send them is a bag of burning dog shit on their front porch for even suggesting such an idea!
It seems that every day we really are coming closer and closer to the insane world of the movie Idiocracy; these bastards want to put fucking advertisements on bloody everything!
Them, them, fuck them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579203</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246710600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>already been done<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)<br>http://www.banksy.co.uk/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>already been done ; ) http : //www.banksy.co.uk/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>already been done ;)http://www.banksy.co.uk/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485</id>
	<title>Ads in books?</title>
	<author>A Pancake</author>
	<datestamp>1246627560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reading books with ads in them? No thanks. I'll be off to the pirate ba... shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading books with ads in them ?
No thanks .
I 'll be off to the pirate ba... shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading books with ads in them?
No thanks.
I'll be off to the pirate ba... shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576751</id>
	<title>The day will come</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246630320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When all marketeers will be burned at the stake.  Hell to get in the spirit of things, we can put advertisements on them, and then burn them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When all marketeers will be burned at the stake .
Hell to get in the spirit of things , we can put advertisements on them , and then burn them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When all marketeers will be burned at the stake.
Hell to get in the spirit of things, we can put advertisements on them, and then burn them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577923</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>ami.one</author>
	<datestamp>1246645020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No Comments. *runs to patent office with above idea*</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Comments .
* runs to patent office with above idea *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Comments.
*runs to patent office with above idea*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576887</id>
	<title>Print books had ads</title>
	<author>henni16</author>
	<datestamp>1246631760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There were (are?) real books with ads.</p><p>Maybe it was only done by a handful of (German?) publishers, but I remember going through my parents bookshelves and flipping through some paper back whodunits and some had one or two pages with ads, sometimes in context to the story. i.e. making a reference to the story.<br>A little bit like with old time radio shows: "While $detective leans back with a $cigarette,  waiting for the guy to leave the house again, why not get yourself a $cigarette with their unique flavor and our special brand of cancer.."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There were ( are ?
) real books with ads.Maybe it was only done by a handful of ( German ?
) publishers , but I remember going through my parents bookshelves and flipping through some paper back whodunits and some had one or two pages with ads , sometimes in context to the story .
i.e. making a reference to the story.A little bit like with old time radio shows : " While $ detective leans back with a $ cigarette , waiting for the guy to leave the house again , why not get yourself a $ cigarette with their unique flavor and our special brand of cancer.. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There were (are?
) real books with ads.Maybe it was only done by a handful of (German?
) publishers, but I remember going through my parents bookshelves and flipping through some paper back whodunits and some had one or two pages with ads, sometimes in context to the story.
i.e. making a reference to the story.A little bit like with old time radio shows: "While $detective leans back with a $cigarette,  waiting for the guy to leave the house again, why not get yourself a $cigarette with their unique flavor and our special brand of cancer.."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579343</id>
	<title>Romeo &amp; Juliet - now with ads</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1246713360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, how my heart yearns to see this happen.</p><blockquote><div><p>Romeo, oh Romeo. [<b>Buy the NEW <a href="http://www.alfaromeo.com/cgi-bin/pbrand.dll/NEWALFA\_COM/controller/home.aspx?language=1" title="alfaromeo.com">Alfa Romeo Mito</a> [alfaromeo.com] </b>]<br>Wherefore art thou Romeo? [<b>Visit <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/" title="metmuseum.org">The Metropolitan Museum of Art</a> [metmuseum.org] </b>]<br>Deny thy father, and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love and i'll no longer be a Capulet. [<b>Need your ads to be seen? Visit <a href="http://www.capulet.com/" title="capulet.com">Capulet Communication</a> [capulet.com] today!</b>]<br>Thou are thyself though not a Montegue. What's Montegue? [<b>Is your bicycle taking up too much space? Get a <a href="http://www.montagueco.com/" title="montagueco.com">Montague folding bike</a> [montagueco.com] </b>]<br>It is not hand, nor foot, nor arm, nor face....nor any other part, belonging to a man. Oh be some other name. What's in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet. [<b>Why not surprise your partner with a large buquet of roses? Order online from <a href="http://www.fleurop.com/?RedirectID=160677445" title="fleurop.com">Fleurop Interflora</a> [fleurop.com] </b>]<br>So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called, retain that dera perfection which he owes without that title. Romeo, doff thy name, and for thy name which is no part of thee, take all myself.</p></div></blockquote><p>I suppose Macbeth would fare even worse:</p><blockquote><div><p>Is this a dagger which I see before me, <b>[Need a new kayak? Visit <a href="http://www.dagger.com/pages/index/homepage" title="dagger.com">Dagger Kayaks</a> [dagger.com]]</b><br>The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. <b>[Are you suffering from erectile dysfunction? Ask your doctor about <a href="http://www.viagra.com/" title="viagra.com">Viagra</a> [viagra.com]]</b><br>I have thee not, and yet I see thee still. [<b>Halucinating again? Why not try <a href="http://zophitin.com/" title="zophitin.com">Zophitin</a> [zophitin.com]? An Amazing 100\% Guaranteed Treatment for Schizophrenia!</b>]<br>Art thou not, fatal vision, sensible<br>To feeling as to sight? or art thou but<br>A dagger of the mind, a false creation,<br>Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain? [<b>Don't miss <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0925245/" title="imdb.com">Heatstroke</a> [imdb.com] tonight on HBO</b>]</p></div></blockquote><p>I have to leave the stage to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDW\_Hj2K0wo" title="youtube.com">Bill Hicks and his thoughts on marketing</a> [youtube.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , how my heart yearns to see this happen.Romeo , oh Romeo .
[ Buy the NEW Alfa Romeo Mito [ alfaromeo.com ] ] Wherefore art thou Romeo ?
[ Visit The Metropolitan Museum of Art [ metmuseum.org ] ] Deny thy father , and refuse thy name , or if thou wilt not , be but sworn my love and i 'll no longer be a Capulet .
[ Need your ads to be seen ?
Visit Capulet Communication [ capulet.com ] today !
] Thou are thyself though not a Montegue .
What 's Montegue ?
[ Is your bicycle taking up too much space ?
Get a Montague folding bike [ montagueco.com ] ] It is not hand , nor foot , nor arm , nor face....nor any other part , belonging to a man .
Oh be some other name .
What 's in a name ?
That which we call a rose , by any other name would smell as sweet .
[ Why not surprise your partner with a large buquet of roses ?
Order online from Fleurop Interflora [ fleurop.com ] ] So Romeo would , were he not Romeo called , retain that dera perfection which he owes without that title .
Romeo , doff thy name , and for thy name which is no part of thee , take all myself.I suppose Macbeth would fare even worse : Is this a dagger which I see before me , [ Need a new kayak ?
Visit Dagger Kayaks [ dagger.com ] ] The handle toward my hand ?
Come , let me clutch thee .
[ Are you suffering from erectile dysfunction ?
Ask your doctor about Viagra [ viagra.com ] ] I have thee not , and yet I see thee still .
[ Halucinating again ?
Why not try Zophitin [ zophitin.com ] ?
An Amazing 100 \ % Guaranteed Treatment for Schizophrenia !
] Art thou not , fatal vision , sensibleTo feeling as to sight ?
or art thou butA dagger of the mind , a false creation,Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain ?
[ Do n't miss Heatstroke [ imdb.com ] tonight on HBO ] I have to leave the stage to Bill Hicks and his thoughts on marketing [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, how my heart yearns to see this happen.Romeo, oh Romeo.
[Buy the NEW Alfa Romeo Mito [alfaromeo.com] ]Wherefore art thou Romeo?
[Visit The Metropolitan Museum of Art [metmuseum.org] ]Deny thy father, and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love and i'll no longer be a Capulet.
[Need your ads to be seen?
Visit Capulet Communication [capulet.com] today!
]Thou are thyself though not a Montegue.
What's Montegue?
[Is your bicycle taking up too much space?
Get a Montague folding bike [montagueco.com] ]It is not hand, nor foot, nor arm, nor face....nor any other part, belonging to a man.
Oh be some other name.
What's in a name?
That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.
[Why not surprise your partner with a large buquet of roses?
Order online from Fleurop Interflora [fleurop.com] ]So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called, retain that dera perfection which he owes without that title.
Romeo, doff thy name, and for thy name which is no part of thee, take all myself.I suppose Macbeth would fare even worse:Is this a dagger which I see before me, [Need a new kayak?
Visit Dagger Kayaks [dagger.com]]The handle toward my hand?
Come, let me clutch thee.
[Are you suffering from erectile dysfunction?
Ask your doctor about Viagra [viagra.com]]I have thee not, and yet I see thee still.
[Halucinating again?
Why not try Zophitin [zophitin.com]?
An Amazing 100\% Guaranteed Treatment for Schizophrenia!
]Art thou not, fatal vision, sensibleTo feeling as to sight?
or art thou butA dagger of the mind, a false creation,Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain?
[Don't miss Heatstroke [imdb.com] tonight on HBO]I have to leave the stage to Bill Hicks and his thoughts on marketing [youtube.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581347</id>
	<title>Prior art over here?</title>
	<author>Emesee</author>
	<datestamp>1246732800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Prior art over here?

<a href="http://wikademia.org/Books" title="wikademia.org" rel="nofollow">http://wikademia.org/Books</a> [wikademia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Prior art over here ?
http : //wikademia.org/Books [ wikademia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prior art over here?
http://wikademia.org/Books [wikademia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577203</id>
	<title>Someone should explain to Bezos...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1246636380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that MAGAZINES are not sufficiently unique from books in this context, and there are MOUNTAINS of prior art for inserting advertising into them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that MAGAZINES are not sufficiently unique from books in this context , and there are MOUNTAINS of prior art for inserting advertising into them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that MAGAZINES are not sufficiently unique from books in this context, and there are MOUNTAINS of prior art for inserting advertising into them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579347</id>
	<title>Way to go Amazon!</title>
	<author>stasike</author>
	<datestamp>1246713420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just yesterday I have learned that Amazon DELETED some books by Ayn Rand that people purchased for their Kindle.
No, I am not talking about deleting the allegedly copyright infringing books from Amazon server, I am talking about deleting said books from the Kindle devices of individual buyers. Amazon just connected (by means of whispernet) to individual kindle devices and deleted the books.

Now we learn about advertisements automatically inserted into books. Way to go Amazon!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just yesterday I have learned that Amazon DELETED some books by Ayn Rand that people purchased for their Kindle .
No , I am not talking about deleting the allegedly copyright infringing books from Amazon server , I am talking about deleting said books from the Kindle devices of individual buyers .
Amazon just connected ( by means of whispernet ) to individual kindle devices and deleted the books .
Now we learn about advertisements automatically inserted into books .
Way to go Amazon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just yesterday I have learned that Amazon DELETED some books by Ayn Rand that people purchased for their Kindle.
No, I am not talking about deleting the allegedly copyright infringing books from Amazon server, I am talking about deleting said books from the Kindle devices of individual buyers.
Amazon just connected (by means of whispernet) to individual kindle devices and deleted the books.
Now we learn about advertisements automatically inserted into books.
Way to go Amazon!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581013</id>
	<title>the BIBLE</title>
	<author>lotho brandybuck</author>
	<datestamp>1246730160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
1.  tr/manna/Gatorade/
</p><p>
2.  Song of Songs, brought to you by Trojan... (cue Trojan Man)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1. tr/manna/Gatorade/ 2 .
Song of Songs , brought to you by Trojan... ( cue Trojan Man )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
1.  tr/manna/Gatorade/

2.
Song of Songs, brought to you by Trojan... (cue Trojan Man)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576799</id>
	<title>That's one more reason</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1246630860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's one more reason to endorse the institution of a National Marketing Weasel Hunting Season.<br>
No limits, tags, or licenses needed.<br>
<br>
I guess for safety's sake, we'd have to use nerf guns, or maybe supersoakers loaded with red ink.<br>
<br>
The more adventurous could shoot them with cameras and post the photos on a Webpage of Shame with hints on where to find them for further nerf action.<br>
<br>

&gt;^\_^\</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one more reason to endorse the institution of a National Marketing Weasel Hunting Season .
No limits , tags , or licenses needed .
I guess for safety 's sake , we 'd have to use nerf guns , or maybe supersoakers loaded with red ink .
The more adventurous could shoot them with cameras and post the photos on a Webpage of Shame with hints on where to find them for further nerf action .
&gt; ^ \ _ ^ \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one more reason to endorse the institution of a National Marketing Weasel Hunting Season.
No limits, tags, or licenses needed.
I guess for safety's sake, we'd have to use nerf guns, or maybe supersoakers loaded with red ink.
The more adventurous could shoot them with cameras and post the photos on a Webpage of Shame with hints on where to find them for further nerf action.
&gt;^\_^\</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577269</id>
	<title>Next up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246637160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will patent 'inserting ads into newspapers' and magazines.</p><p>There goes my day job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will patent 'inserting ads into newspapers ' and magazines.There goes my day job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will patent 'inserting ads into newspapers' and magazines.There goes my day job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579225</id>
	<title>Has been done already</title>
	<author>the\_other\_chewey</author>
	<datestamp>1246711080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>About 30-40 years ago, a German publisher inserted ads in their (rather cheap)<br>
paperback SciFi books. Those ads are (present tense - the books still exist) annoying as hell,<br>
because they were adapted to the story: A right page would first look and read as if<br>
it were still part of the story, but subtly insert stuff about the hero using the <br>
product advertised (shavers, national bank bonds(!) etc.), and the following left page would be a full page ad.<br>
<br>
Fortunately, this means that ripping out one sheet of paper got rid of the inserted ad.<br>
<br>
I haven't seen this since, so apparently it wasn't worth the customer annoyance. I'd hate to<br>
see this make a comeback though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>About 30-40 years ago , a German publisher inserted ads in their ( rather cheap ) paperback SciFi books .
Those ads are ( present tense - the books still exist ) annoying as hell , because they were adapted to the story : A right page would first look and read as if it were still part of the story , but subtly insert stuff about the hero using the product advertised ( shavers , national bank bonds ( !
) etc .
) , and the following left page would be a full page ad .
Fortunately , this means that ripping out one sheet of paper got rid of the inserted ad .
I have n't seen this since , so apparently it was n't worth the customer annoyance .
I 'd hate to see this make a comeback though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About 30-40 years ago, a German publisher inserted ads in their (rather cheap)
paperback SciFi books.
Those ads are (present tense - the books still exist) annoying as hell,
because they were adapted to the story: A right page would first look and read as if
it were still part of the story, but subtly insert stuff about the hero using the 
product advertised (shavers, national bank bonds(!
) etc.
), and the following left page would be a full page ad.
Fortunately, this means that ripping out one sheet of paper got rid of the inserted ad.
I haven't seen this since, so apparently it wasn't worth the customer annoyance.
I'd hate to
see this make a comeback though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576947</id>
	<title>Wrong in so many ways!</title>
	<author>peter1</author>
	<datestamp>1246632720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely, totally, without question, no f***ing way!  I am a huge proponent of the eBook concept and have a number of them in my collection already.  However it is because of such moronic thinking that they are all either in an open format or are unmodified PDF's.  I will never purchase an eBook that has been modified in such a crass and unspeakable manner.  Why don't we just recut all of our classic media - movies, newspapers, books, music, etc. and put in ads for everything from Hooters to Joe's Pizza Shack?

So far my eBook reader of choice has been the Fujitsu p1630 series tablet but I have been eyeing the Kindle for its size, weight and library of books.  This right here just changed my mind - the Kindle and its bloody advertising can just keep Bezos warm in his office, I'm sticking with the Fujitsu!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely , totally , without question , no f * * * ing way !
I am a huge proponent of the eBook concept and have a number of them in my collection already .
However it is because of such moronic thinking that they are all either in an open format or are unmodified PDF 's .
I will never purchase an eBook that has been modified in such a crass and unspeakable manner .
Why do n't we just recut all of our classic media - movies , newspapers , books , music , etc .
and put in ads for everything from Hooters to Joe 's Pizza Shack ?
So far my eBook reader of choice has been the Fujitsu p1630 series tablet but I have been eyeing the Kindle for its size , weight and library of books .
This right here just changed my mind - the Kindle and its bloody advertising can just keep Bezos warm in his office , I 'm sticking with the Fujitsu !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely, totally, without question, no f***ing way!
I am a huge proponent of the eBook concept and have a number of them in my collection already.
However it is because of such moronic thinking that they are all either in an open format or are unmodified PDF's.
I will never purchase an eBook that has been modified in such a crass and unspeakable manner.
Why don't we just recut all of our classic media - movies, newspapers, books, music, etc.
and put in ads for everything from Hooters to Joe's Pizza Shack?
So far my eBook reader of choice has been the Fujitsu p1630 series tablet but I have been eyeing the Kindle for its size, weight and library of books.
This right here just changed my mind - the Kindle and its bloody advertising can just keep Bezos warm in his office, I'm sticking with the Fujitsu!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395</id>
	<title>If it's actually tasteful, I wouldn't mind so much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246626900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't mind a tasteful, text-only add in its own table that doesn't interrupt the flow of the text I'm reading.  I would mind full-image or full-page ads.</p><p>I suggest doing it the way authors like Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams used footnotes.  Put an asterisk, add a footnote advertisement, and make it funny and in context with the text.  Then I might actually buy whatever crap they're hawking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't mind a tasteful , text-only add in its own table that does n't interrupt the flow of the text I 'm reading .
I would mind full-image or full-page ads.I suggest doing it the way authors like Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams used footnotes .
Put an asterisk , add a footnote advertisement , and make it funny and in context with the text .
Then I might actually buy whatever crap they 're hawking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't mind a tasteful, text-only add in its own table that doesn't interrupt the flow of the text I'm reading.
I would mind full-image or full-page ads.I suggest doing it the way authors like Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams used footnotes.
Put an asterisk, add a footnote advertisement, and make it funny and in context with the text.
Then I might actually buy whatever crap they're hawking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576411</id>
	<title>Best Department</title>
	<author>Jeff321</author>
	<datestamp>1246627020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from the it-was-the-best-of-times,-it-was-comcastic dept.</p><p>I laughed at that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from the it-was-the-best-of-times,-it-was-comcastic dept.I laughed at that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the it-was-the-best-of-times,-it-was-comcastic dept.I laughed at that one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578537</id>
	<title>Good that Kindle is not available in Europe</title>
	<author>krischik</author>
	<datestamp>1246740600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more reason to be glad that Kindle is still not sold in Europe. Amazons eBook strategy is just disgraceful in all aspects and every day the Kindle start in Europe is delayed is a good day for eBooks and it gives the competition here another day head start.</p><p>I just hope that by the time Amazon's Kindle makes it out of the US they have lost so much ground that they never be able to catch up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more reason to be glad that Kindle is still not sold in Europe .
Amazons eBook strategy is just disgraceful in all aspects and every day the Kindle start in Europe is delayed is a good day for eBooks and it gives the competition here another day head start.I just hope that by the time Amazon 's Kindle makes it out of the US they have lost so much ground that they never be able to catch up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more reason to be glad that Kindle is still not sold in Europe.
Amazons eBook strategy is just disgraceful in all aspects and every day the Kindle start in Europe is delayed is a good day for eBooks and it gives the competition here another day head start.I just hope that by the time Amazon's Kindle makes it out of the US they have lost so much ground that they never be able to catch up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579399</id>
	<title>And I always thought...</title>
	<author>Organic Brain Damage</author>
	<datestamp>1246714380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... the E in E-Book stood for electronic.  Turns out it's Evil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the E in E-Book stood for electronic .
Turns out it 's Evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the E in E-Book stood for electronic.
Turns out it's Evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577347</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Zordak</author>
	<datestamp>1246637940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a delightfully evil idea!  And by the way, it's quite possibly patentable itself.  And it would be a totally legitimate derivative work of public domain works.  Couple it with some Google Adword algorithms, include hyperlinks to relevant products, and you've got a winning idea!  (By the way, for $2,500, I could get you a provisional patent application on the idea---no joke).</p><p>You could even work the algorithm to add or mutate whole sentences.  Just think:  "Elizabeth Bennett quickly spritzed some Chanel No. 5(R) [hyperlink] perfume, and went to the drawing room to meet Mr. Darcy."  "Why, it's the bell ringer from Notre Dame!  The one who rings the well-crafted Pass &amp; Stern(R) church bells!"  "Thanks to widening adoption of Apple(R)[hyperlink] productss, it was the best of times.  But also because of the continued entrenchment of Microsoft, it was the worst of times."  We could have a whole new generation grow up believing that Sherlock Holmes smoked Camels!  Or that Captain Nemo built his submarine using GE products!  Or that Tarzan learned to read from a set of Prentice-Hall dictionaries!    Or that Billy Budd sailed on a Northrop Grumman-built Man-of-War!  Or that Romeo's apothecary sold only genuine Pfizer products!  Why, we could wreck the entire public domain!</p><p>
You need to patent this now. That way, when Amazon inevitably decides to do this, I can sue them for you, and we can both retire rich.  And you can get a permanent injunction that will force them to stop doing it.  It's a double win!K/p&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a delightfully evil idea !
And by the way , it 's quite possibly patentable itself .
And it would be a totally legitimate derivative work of public domain works .
Couple it with some Google Adword algorithms , include hyperlinks to relevant products , and you 've got a winning idea !
( By the way , for $ 2,500 , I could get you a provisional patent application on the idea---no joke ) .You could even work the algorithm to add or mutate whole sentences .
Just think : " Elizabeth Bennett quickly spritzed some Chanel No .
5 ( R ) [ hyperlink ] perfume , and went to the drawing room to meet Mr .
Darcy. " " Why , it 's the bell ringer from Notre Dame !
The one who rings the well-crafted Pass &amp; Stern ( R ) church bells !
" " Thanks to widening adoption of Apple ( R ) [ hyperlink ] productss , it was the best of times .
But also because of the continued entrenchment of Microsoft , it was the worst of times .
" We could have a whole new generation grow up believing that Sherlock Holmes smoked Camels !
Or that Captain Nemo built his submarine using GE products !
Or that Tarzan learned to read from a set of Prentice-Hall dictionaries !
Or that Billy Budd sailed on a Northrop Grumman-built Man-of-War !
Or that Romeo 's apothecary sold only genuine Pfizer products !
Why , we could wreck the entire public domain !
You need to patent this now .
That way , when Amazon inevitably decides to do this , I can sue them for you , and we can both retire rich .
And you can get a permanent injunction that will force them to stop doing it .
It 's a double win ! K/p &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a delightfully evil idea!
And by the way, it's quite possibly patentable itself.
And it would be a totally legitimate derivative work of public domain works.
Couple it with some Google Adword algorithms, include hyperlinks to relevant products, and you've got a winning idea!
(By the way, for $2,500, I could get you a provisional patent application on the idea---no joke).You could even work the algorithm to add or mutate whole sentences.
Just think:  "Elizabeth Bennett quickly spritzed some Chanel No.
5(R) [hyperlink] perfume, and went to the drawing room to meet Mr.
Darcy."  "Why, it's the bell ringer from Notre Dame!
The one who rings the well-crafted Pass &amp; Stern(R) church bells!
"  "Thanks to widening adoption of Apple(R)[hyperlink] productss, it was the best of times.
But also because of the continued entrenchment of Microsoft, it was the worst of times.
"  We could have a whole new generation grow up believing that Sherlock Holmes smoked Camels!
Or that Captain Nemo built his submarine using GE products!
Or that Tarzan learned to read from a set of Prentice-Hall dictionaries!
Or that Billy Budd sailed on a Northrop Grumman-built Man-of-War!
Or that Romeo's apothecary sold only genuine Pfizer products!
Why, we could wreck the entire public domain!
You need to patent this now.
That way, when Amazon inevitably decides to do this, I can sue them for you, and we can both retire rich.
And you can get a permanent injunction that will force them to stop doing it.
It's a double win!K/p&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577291</id>
	<title>Paid links are bid on by search term, I believe</title>
	<author>Rix</author>
	<datestamp>1246637340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not all that surprising that no one's interested in buying space on the search terms you listed (Amazon won't allow affiliates to do that, fyi). If you put the text of those books on a page with an adsense box, I'm sure Google would find something to put there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not all that surprising that no one 's interested in buying space on the search terms you listed ( Amazon wo n't allow affiliates to do that , fyi ) .
If you put the text of those books on a page with an adsense box , I 'm sure Google would find something to put there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not all that surprising that no one's interested in buying space on the search terms you listed (Amazon won't allow affiliates to do that, fyi).
If you put the text of those books on a page with an adsense box, I'm sure Google would find something to put there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576723</id>
	<title>Hell no.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246629900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot say "Hell no." and "I hope the people who came up with this idea are tied down and are burned alive by dripping phosperous." enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not say " Hell no .
" and " I hope the people who came up with this idea are tied down and are burned alive by dripping phosperous .
" enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot say "Hell no.
" and "I hope the people who came up with this idea are tied down and are burned alive by dripping phosperous.
" enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576637</id>
	<title>This is a great idea!</title>
	<author>agrippa\_cash</author>
	<datestamp>1246629060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've already started going through old software patents and adding "in the real world" to them.  My one-click vending machine should allow me to buy an island.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already started going through old software patents and adding " in the real world " to them .
My one-click vending machine should allow me to buy an island .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already started going through old software patents and adding "in the real world" to them.
My one-click vending machine should allow me to buy an island.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576829</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>delphi125</author>
	<datestamp>1246631280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><div><p>That aside, isn't this patent a good thing? It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.</p></div><p>Patents get licensed. In terms of your description, $10 product would get sold for $6 by other publishers - $5 "up front" and $1 to cover the patent royalty.</p><p>Amazon has an interesting self-publishing business (forget what it is called and I'm certainly not going to advertise for them), but I can imagine them offering trade-quality books which aren't otherwise available (out of copyright, let alone print) at a discount if they can use 1 page in 20 for adverts.</p><p>"The Scarlet Pimpernel" might be $10 if printed without ads, but less if the buyer chooses that option. Amazon could advertise it's own related goods (perhaps a Hornblower video, to suggest something not directly related but close enough) and provide a discount voucher (with unique code) either per book printed or per advert.</p><p>Of course, some time soon, printing on demand will become efficient for individual books. If Amazon wants a slice of advertising in any of them, then a patent "works" - but as far as I can see it is a business method.</p><p>In short: if they want to put ads in books printed to demand to cut end-user costs, fine. If every left=even page had an ad and books were free, I'd love it. But patent? Printed media have sufficient prior art for advertising, tyvm.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That aside , is n't this patent a good thing ?
It means that only Amazon 's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.Patents get licensed .
In terms of your description , $ 10 product would get sold for $ 6 by other publishers - $ 5 " up front " and $ 1 to cover the patent royalty.Amazon has an interesting self-publishing business ( forget what it is called and I 'm certainly not going to advertise for them ) , but I can imagine them offering trade-quality books which are n't otherwise available ( out of copyright , let alone print ) at a discount if they can use 1 page in 20 for adverts .
" The Scarlet Pimpernel " might be $ 10 if printed without ads , but less if the buyer chooses that option .
Amazon could advertise it 's own related goods ( perhaps a Hornblower video , to suggest something not directly related but close enough ) and provide a discount voucher ( with unique code ) either per book printed or per advert.Of course , some time soon , printing on demand will become efficient for individual books .
If Amazon wants a slice of advertising in any of them , then a patent " works " - but as far as I can see it is a business method.In short : if they want to put ads in books printed to demand to cut end-user costs , fine .
If every left = even page had an ad and books were free , I 'd love it .
But patent ?
Printed media have sufficient prior art for advertising , tyvm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That aside, isn't this patent a good thing?
It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.Patents get licensed.
In terms of your description, $10 product would get sold for $6 by other publishers - $5 "up front" and $1 to cover the patent royalty.Amazon has an interesting self-publishing business (forget what it is called and I'm certainly not going to advertise for them), but I can imagine them offering trade-quality books which aren't otherwise available (out of copyright, let alone print) at a discount if they can use 1 page in 20 for adverts.
"The Scarlet Pimpernel" might be $10 if printed without ads, but less if the buyer chooses that option.
Amazon could advertise it's own related goods (perhaps a Hornblower video, to suggest something not directly related but close enough) and provide a discount voucher (with unique code) either per book printed or per advert.Of course, some time soon, printing on demand will become efficient for individual books.
If Amazon wants a slice of advertising in any of them, then a patent "works" - but as far as I can see it is a business method.In short: if they want to put ads in books printed to demand to cut end-user costs, fine.
If every left=even page had an ad and books were free, I'd love it.
But patent?
Printed media have sufficient prior art for advertising, tyvm.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577773</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246642800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's next, an Ad for Viagra alongside the story of David and the Queen of Sheba in the King James Bible?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's next , an Ad for Viagra alongside the story of David and the Queen of Sheba in the King James Bible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's next, an Ad for Viagra alongside the story of David and the Queen of Sheba in the King James Bible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576677</id>
	<title>learn to ignore ads</title>
	<author>karl3</author>
	<datestamp>1246629420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i don't know if i'm a medical phenomenon, but i've always been extremely good at ignoring adds. a couple of months ago, i ended up in a group discussing a mildly controversial billboard, and i was the only one that hasn't seen it. on my way home, i've noticed that same billboard was *virtually* ~5 meters away from my flat, so i must have passed by it dozens of times on way to my buss stop.

you've already learned how to ignore lots of stuff (like your own smell or traffic noise), so learn how to ignore adds as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i do n't know if i 'm a medical phenomenon , but i 've always been extremely good at ignoring adds .
a couple of months ago , i ended up in a group discussing a mildly controversial billboard , and i was the only one that has n't seen it .
on my way home , i 've noticed that same billboard was * virtually * ~ 5 meters away from my flat , so i must have passed by it dozens of times on way to my buss stop .
you 've already learned how to ignore lots of stuff ( like your own smell or traffic noise ) , so learn how to ignore adds as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i don't know if i'm a medical phenomenon, but i've always been extremely good at ignoring adds.
a couple of months ago, i ended up in a group discussing a mildly controversial billboard, and i was the only one that hasn't seen it.
on my way home, i've noticed that same billboard was *virtually* ~5 meters away from my flat, so i must have passed by it dozens of times on way to my buss stop.
you've already learned how to ignore lots of stuff (like your own smell or traffic noise), so learn how to ignore adds as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401</id>
	<title>Let them patent it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246626960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.  It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee, which should discourage them.  Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon, claiming magazines with ads are prior art.  Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death.

</p><p>Except for Amazon of course, since they hold the patent.  But they can try it, and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it.  It'll tank, hard.  Nobody will want this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee , which should discourage them .
Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon , claiming magazines with ads are prior art .
Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death .
Except for Amazon of course , since they hold the patent .
But they can try it , and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it .
It 'll tank , hard .
Nobody will want this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee, which should discourage them.
Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon, claiming magazines with ads are prior art.
Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death.
Except for Amazon of course, since they hold the patent.
But they can try it, and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it.
It'll tank, hard.
Nobody will want this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579239</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>howardd21</author>
	<datestamp>1246711380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.)</p></div><p>That is true to an extent, obviously they do not do ads out of the goodness of their heart. They benefit the bottom line somewhere. But they also enable the company to keep the price point lower to cover expenses and generate a profit.  Now a book that would sell for $14 can be sold for $10 with $5 of ads.  As long as they make up the lost customers who refuse ads with new ones who can now afford the book at $10 who could not buy it at $14, then they just created new profit. <br> <br>

They not only increase profit, they expand the market through subsidies.<br> <br>

And I have XM Radio, and I am sure there are commercials coming at some point,which I hate to think of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ads increase profit for companies , they never decrease the price of products , except those offered for free ( like Google .
) That is true to an extent , obviously they do not do ads out of the goodness of their heart .
They benefit the bottom line somewhere .
But they also enable the company to keep the price point lower to cover expenses and generate a profit .
Now a book that would sell for $ 14 can be sold for $ 10 with $ 5 of ads .
As long as they make up the lost customers who refuse ads with new ones who can now afford the book at $ 10 who could not buy it at $ 14 , then they just created new profit .
They not only increase profit , they expand the market through subsidies .
And I have XM Radio , and I am sure there are commercials coming at some point,which I hate to think of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.
)That is true to an extent, obviously they do not do ads out of the goodness of their heart.
They benefit the bottom line somewhere.
But they also enable the company to keep the price point lower to cover expenses and generate a profit.
Now a book that would sell for $14 can be sold for $10 with $5 of ads.
As long as they make up the lost customers who refuse ads with new ones who can now afford the book at $10 who could not buy it at $14, then they just created new profit.
They not only increase profit, they expand the market through subsidies.
And I have XM Radio, and I am sure there are commercials coming at some point,which I hate to think of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28588669</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>dizzyjam</author>
	<datestamp>1246788960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With advertisements on TV (whether Cable or Broadcast), I've always looked at them as a nice break to go get a drink or discuss the show with whoever I was watching it with. I just mute the ads until the break is over with. In a book, that wouldn't be the case. You'd be stuck with those ads there whether you wanted them there or not. You can't just put the book down until the ad is over with because when you pick it up again, there's the ad. The only way to get rid of them would be to rip them out of the book. And who wants to damage their book?<br>
<br>
We don't need ads in the margins, we don't need ads at the bottom as a subscript, we don't need ads at the end of a chapter. Anything that would upset the flow of the book is just unwanted, period.<br>
<br>
As far as a "section in the middle", didn't they used to do that back in the seventies with paperbacks? In the middle would be pull out postcard advertisements for all sorts of things? I've read those books and didn't care for the interruption then, I wouldn't want it now either.<br>
<br>
We don't need to "update" books, nor do we need to to change "burger" to "Big Mac" or "Whopper". That kind of thing should be up to the individual author who wrote the story to begin with.<br>
<br>
If ads need to be put in books, they should be put at the end after the story like the publisher's ads are when they put them in. Just add a few ads (and make sure the company placing the ad gets charged for it) after the story is finished, and let the publisher throw in their own ads for other books by the author, or other books they've already published or are coming soon, and then wham! the book is over with and everyone is pleased: The author is pleased because no one messed with his or her prose to insert a senseless ad, the reader is pleased because the story flowed without interruption, the company placing the ad is pleased because they got their ad in there, and the publisher is pleased because they just made a little extra money from a company placing an ad without lowering the cost of the book they offered to us. All in all, a great deal.<br>
<br>
If they do it this way. That's the only way I would continue buying books. And I read a LOT. I'd have to just stick with collecting all the old books in used bookstores if they did this to ensure I kept reading, but without the ads.<br>
<br>
I really don't think people want ads in their books. It would just be too frustrating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With advertisements on TV ( whether Cable or Broadcast ) , I 've always looked at them as a nice break to go get a drink or discuss the show with whoever I was watching it with .
I just mute the ads until the break is over with .
In a book , that would n't be the case .
You 'd be stuck with those ads there whether you wanted them there or not .
You ca n't just put the book down until the ad is over with because when you pick it up again , there 's the ad .
The only way to get rid of them would be to rip them out of the book .
And who wants to damage their book ?
We do n't need ads in the margins , we do n't need ads at the bottom as a subscript , we do n't need ads at the end of a chapter .
Anything that would upset the flow of the book is just unwanted , period .
As far as a " section in the middle " , did n't they used to do that back in the seventies with paperbacks ?
In the middle would be pull out postcard advertisements for all sorts of things ?
I 've read those books and did n't care for the interruption then , I would n't want it now either .
We do n't need to " update " books , nor do we need to to change " burger " to " Big Mac " or " Whopper " .
That kind of thing should be up to the individual author who wrote the story to begin with .
If ads need to be put in books , they should be put at the end after the story like the publisher 's ads are when they put them in .
Just add a few ads ( and make sure the company placing the ad gets charged for it ) after the story is finished , and let the publisher throw in their own ads for other books by the author , or other books they 've already published or are coming soon , and then wham !
the book is over with and everyone is pleased : The author is pleased because no one messed with his or her prose to insert a senseless ad , the reader is pleased because the story flowed without interruption , the company placing the ad is pleased because they got their ad in there , and the publisher is pleased because they just made a little extra money from a company placing an ad without lowering the cost of the book they offered to us .
All in all , a great deal .
If they do it this way .
That 's the only way I would continue buying books .
And I read a LOT .
I 'd have to just stick with collecting all the old books in used bookstores if they did this to ensure I kept reading , but without the ads .
I really do n't think people want ads in their books .
It would just be too frustrating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With advertisements on TV (whether Cable or Broadcast), I've always looked at them as a nice break to go get a drink or discuss the show with whoever I was watching it with.
I just mute the ads until the break is over with.
In a book, that wouldn't be the case.
You'd be stuck with those ads there whether you wanted them there or not.
You can't just put the book down until the ad is over with because when you pick it up again, there's the ad.
The only way to get rid of them would be to rip them out of the book.
And who wants to damage their book?
We don't need ads in the margins, we don't need ads at the bottom as a subscript, we don't need ads at the end of a chapter.
Anything that would upset the flow of the book is just unwanted, period.
As far as a "section in the middle", didn't they used to do that back in the seventies with paperbacks?
In the middle would be pull out postcard advertisements for all sorts of things?
I've read those books and didn't care for the interruption then, I wouldn't want it now either.
We don't need to "update" books, nor do we need to to change "burger" to "Big Mac" or "Whopper".
That kind of thing should be up to the individual author who wrote the story to begin with.
If ads need to be put in books, they should be put at the end after the story like the publisher's ads are when they put them in.
Just add a few ads (and make sure the company placing the ad gets charged for it) after the story is finished, and let the publisher throw in their own ads for other books by the author, or other books they've already published or are coming soon, and then wham!
the book is over with and everyone is pleased: The author is pleased because no one messed with his or her prose to insert a senseless ad, the reader is pleased because the story flowed without interruption, the company placing the ad is pleased because they got their ad in there, and the publisher is pleased because they just made a little extra money from a company placing an ad without lowering the cost of the book they offered to us.
All in all, a great deal.
If they do it this way.
That's the only way I would continue buying books.
And I read a LOT.
I'd have to just stick with collecting all the old books in used bookstores if they did this to ensure I kept reading, but without the ads.
I really don't think people want ads in their books.
It would just be too frustrating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578589</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>WWWWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246698300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somehow "the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe" just doesn't ring right too me....</p></div><p>Or the hobbits looking for Gandalf in the Bree McDonald's. (I mean, I'd have to go check that I didn't accidentally pick up <i>Bored of the Rings</i>.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow " the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe " just does n't ring right too me....Or the hobbits looking for Gandalf in the Bree McDonald 's .
( I mean , I 'd have to go check that I did n't accidentally pick up Bored of the Rings .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow "the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe" just doesn't ring right too me....Or the hobbits looking for Gandalf in the Bree McDonald's.
(I mean, I'd have to go check that I didn't accidentally pick up Bored of the Rings.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576703</id>
	<title>Never clicked on a Google Ad</title>
	<author>Gruff1002</author>
	<datestamp>1246629780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>U click on google ads, hello data mining, this in accordance with prophecy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>U click on google ads , hello data mining , this in accordance with prophecy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>U click on google ads, hello data mining, this in accordance with prophecy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578625</id>
	<title>I think this is great!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246698900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The earlier we have a way to let some idiot sue everyone on the planet for putting ads in their books, the better.<br>Now all we have to do, is not buy amazon ebooks, and anonymously inform amazon, that their sales go down because of other companies selling cheaper books with ads in them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The earlier we have a way to let some idiot sue everyone on the planet for putting ads in their books , the better.Now all we have to do , is not buy amazon ebooks , and anonymously inform amazon , that their sales go down because of other companies selling cheaper books with ads in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earlier we have a way to let some idiot sue everyone on the planet for putting ads in their books, the better.Now all we have to do, is not buy amazon ebooks, and anonymously inform amazon, that their sales go down because of other companies selling cheaper books with ads in them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576627</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246628940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed, they may even give you the book for free with enough ads stashed in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , they may even give you the book for free with enough ads stashed in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, they may even give you the book for free with enough ads stashed in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577471</id>
	<title>tivio for ebooks?</title>
	<author>ushere</author>
	<datestamp>1246639140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as soon as it's patented (if it is heaven forbid), they'll be some sort of 'cut out the ads' software available....</p><p>but if it is patented, then they've just lost another potential customer....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as soon as it 's patented ( if it is heaven forbid ) , they 'll be some sort of 'cut out the ads ' software available....but if it is patented , then they 've just lost another potential customer... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as soon as it's patented (if it is heaven forbid), they'll be some sort of 'cut out the ads' software available....but if it is patented, then they've just lost another potential customer....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577225</id>
	<title>Readers Digest</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1246636680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think people have already invented this.  It is called Readers Digest.   Merely switching from a magazine format to a book format is irrelevant, particularly because it is coming in electronic format, not paper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think people have already invented this .
It is called Readers Digest .
Merely switching from a magazine format to a book format is irrelevant , particularly because it is coming in electronic format , not paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think people have already invented this.
It is called Readers Digest.
Merely switching from a magazine format to a book format is irrelevant, particularly because it is coming in electronic format, not paper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576903</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246632120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased. I'm sorry Amazon. Blow it out your ass. I'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book.</p></div><p>In the past (the 70's and 80's, perhaps early 90's) you could find cigarette ads in paperback books.  They'd tend to be a slightly thicker piece of paper, color printed, both sides.  Some were perforated so they could be torn out easily.</p><p>To be honest I don't recall how common this was.  I don't recall seeing it more than a handful of times.  If I was to dig through all my paperbacks I'm sure I could find a couple of these ads.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased .
I 'm sorry Amazon .
Blow it out your ass .
I 'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book.In the past ( the 70 's and 80 's , perhaps early 90 's ) you could find cigarette ads in paperback books .
They 'd tend to be a slightly thicker piece of paper , color printed , both sides .
Some were perforated so they could be torn out easily.To be honest I do n't recall how common this was .
I do n't recall seeing it more than a handful of times .
If I was to dig through all my paperbacks I 'm sure I could find a couple of these ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased.
I'm sorry Amazon.
Blow it out your ass.
I'll stick to paper backs rather than your greed infected E-book.In the past (the 70's and 80's, perhaps early 90's) you could find cigarette ads in paperback books.
They'd tend to be a slightly thicker piece of paper, color printed, both sides.
Some were perforated so they could be torn out easily.To be honest I don't recall how common this was.
I don't recall seeing it more than a handful of times.
If I was to dig through all my paperbacks I'm sure I could find a couple of these ads.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576861</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>linguizic</author>
	<datestamp>1246631520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow "the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe" just doesn't ring right too me....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow " the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe " just does n't ring right too me... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow "the Fudruckers at the End of the Universe" just doesn't ring right too me....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577001</id>
	<title>Re:Google itself can't find relevant ads for class</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer.</p></div><p>Rush song clips and Rock Band DLC offers?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer.Rush song clips and Rock Band DLC offers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer.Rush song clips and Rock Band DLC offers?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576529</id>
	<title>The only way</title>
	<author>mad zambian</author>
	<datestamp>1246627920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that this sort of bullshit would be in any way acceptable would be if the book was free for the asking. Ads (for other books, or closely related areas) at the end of the book is entirely acceptable. Solid pages of ads for [whatever] in the middle of the text? And you expect me to pay for it? What substances are you abusing?<br>Note to Amazon. The printed page != web pages.<br>The world is covered in far too fucking many adverts as it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that this sort of bullshit would be in any way acceptable would be if the book was free for the asking .
Ads ( for other books , or closely related areas ) at the end of the book is entirely acceptable .
Solid pages of ads for [ whatever ] in the middle of the text ?
And you expect me to pay for it ?
What substances are you abusing ? Note to Amazon .
The printed page ! = web pages.The world is covered in far too fucking many adverts as it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that this sort of bullshit would be in any way acceptable would be if the book was free for the asking.
Ads (for other books, or closely related areas) at the end of the book is entirely acceptable.
Solid pages of ads for [whatever] in the middle of the text?
And you expect me to pay for it?
What substances are you abusing?Note to Amazon.
The printed page != web pages.The world is covered in far too fucking many adverts as it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577165</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Swizec</author>
	<datestamp>1246635720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except it's far more likely they'll charge you $15 for the improved experience of an ad-infested book and earn another $15 through advertising. Why on earth would they decrease the price now that they're providing a new feature?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except it 's far more likely they 'll charge you $ 15 for the improved experience of an ad-infested book and earn another $ 15 through advertising .
Why on earth would they decrease the price now that they 're providing a new feature ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except it's far more likely they'll charge you $15 for the improved experience of an ad-infested book and earn another $15 through advertising.
Why on earth would they decrease the price now that they're providing a new feature?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578115</id>
	<title>BILLY MAYS HERE...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246647480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the new COMPLETELY LAME slashdot script filters out all caps.  you will never know what Billy had to say...  fucking lame as shit.</p><p>"Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING."</p><p>Oh REEELY?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the new COMPLETELY LAME slashdot script filters out all caps .
you will never know what Billy had to say... fucking lame as shit .
" Filter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like YELLING .
" Oh REEELY ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the new COMPLETELY LAME slashdot script filters out all caps.
you will never know what Billy had to say...  fucking lame as shit.
"Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like YELLING.
"Oh REEELY?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581011</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1246730160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.</p></div><p>Amazon would think that a very good idea; they'd be in with a chance of picking up replacement purchases.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.Amazon would think that a very good idea ; they 'd be in with a chance of picking up replacement purchases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that ever came to be I would wholeheartedly endorse book burning.Amazon would think that a very good idea; they'd be in with a chance of picking up replacement purchases.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579099</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246708560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One guy says "I'd like to buy a $10 product at half price, with the other half subsidised by ads", and you reply with "Publishers make a profit at the current prices, this is just greed at work".  Good God, people, this is what you mod up as 'insight'?</p><p>This idea has the potential to reduce the price we pay for books, possibly even to zero in some circumstances.  There's no reason it has to be applied to all books, and no reason not to believe the ad-free version would be available at the typical price.  It also has the potential to be abused for greed.  It might be best to consider all options before condemning the idea out of hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One guy says " I 'd like to buy a $ 10 product at half price , with the other half subsidised by ads " , and you reply with " Publishers make a profit at the current prices , this is just greed at work " .
Good God , people , this is what you mod up as 'insight ' ? This idea has the potential to reduce the price we pay for books , possibly even to zero in some circumstances .
There 's no reason it has to be applied to all books , and no reason not to believe the ad-free version would be available at the typical price .
It also has the potential to be abused for greed .
It might be best to consider all options before condemning the idea out of hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One guy says "I'd like to buy a $10 product at half price, with the other half subsidised by ads", and you reply with "Publishers make a profit at the current prices, this is just greed at work".
Good God, people, this is what you mod up as 'insight'?This idea has the potential to reduce the price we pay for books, possibly even to zero in some circumstances.
There's no reason it has to be applied to all books, and no reason not to believe the ad-free version would be available at the typical price.
It also has the potential to be abused for greed.
It might be best to consider all options before condemning the idea out of hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578903</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1246704300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, companies don't reduce all their prices when they implement ads, but that doesn't mean products aren't cheaper than they would otherwise be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , companies do n't reduce all their prices when they implement ads , but that does n't mean products are n't cheaper than they would otherwise be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, companies don't reduce all their prices when they implement ads, but that doesn't mean products aren't cheaper than they would otherwise be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576357</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246626480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your Hemingway experience?"</p></div><p>End it immediately, because I'd go ogle some babe in a push-up and hot pants while chowing down on a plate of buffalo wings while some sporting event plays in the background.</p><p>This would be quite an improvement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your Hemingway experience ?
" End it immediately , because I 'd go ogle some babe in a push-up and hot pants while chowing down on a plate of buffalo wings while some sporting event plays in the background.This would be quite an improvement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what would a delightfully-tacky-yet-unrefined Hooters ad do for your Hemingway experience?
"End it immediately, because I'd go ogle some babe in a push-up and hot pants while chowing down on a plate of buffalo wings while some sporting event plays in the background.This would be quite an improvement.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578049</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>goldsaturn</author>
	<datestamp>1246646760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Why stop there? Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target."</p></div><p>Don't you mean <a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/pizza-hut-changes-its-name.aspx" title="msn.com" rel="nofollow">The Hut</a> [msn.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Why stop there ?
Let sponsors have characters " As Captain 'Pizza Hut ' Ahab looked out over the sea , he saw her , Moby Dick , brought to you by Target .
" Do n't you mean The Hut [ msn.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Why stop there?
Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target.
"Don't you mean The Hut [msn.com]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28588587</id>
	<title>i think most people here are missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246788120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i think most people here are missing the point.</p><p>The reason Amazon wants to put ads in books, is so they can make then available for free, and still make money.<br>This is a shift from information / books for a fee versus ad sponsered content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i think most people here are missing the point.The reason Amazon wants to put ads in books , is so they can make then available for free , and still make money.This is a shift from information / books for a fee versus ad sponsered content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think most people here are missing the point.The reason Amazon wants to put ads in books, is so they can make then available for free, and still make money.This is a shift from information / books for a fee versus ad sponsered content.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576563</id>
	<title>Old Idea</title>
	<author>gweihir</author>
	<datestamp>1246628160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I saw something like this about 25 years ago in some German trashy SF. The story had seomthing about food and then the next page there was an ad for "Heisse Tasse" by Maggi or such a thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I saw something like this about 25 years ago in some German trashy SF .
The story had seomthing about food and then the next page there was an ad for " Heisse Tasse " by Maggi or such a thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I saw something like this about 25 years ago in some German trashy SF.
The story had seomthing about food and then the next page there was an ad for "Heisse Tasse" by Maggi or such a thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576423</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1246627080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Three words for you "Follow The Money". Whenever something doesn't make sense, be it politics or corporate actions, "Follow The Money"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Three words for you " Follow The Money " .
Whenever something does n't make sense , be it politics or corporate actions , " Follow The Money " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three words for you "Follow The Money".
Whenever something doesn't make sense, be it politics or corporate actions, "Follow The Money"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577145</id>
	<title>That's not so bad as it could be...</title>
	<author>slaad</author>
	<datestamp>1246635420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not so bad. From the way the headline read, my first though was that they would actually do product placement within the story.
<br> <br>
So instead of King Arthur drinking a a glass of wine he'd be drinking a can of Coke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not so bad .
From the way the headline read , my first though was that they would actually do product placement within the story .
So instead of King Arthur drinking a a glass of wine he 'd be drinking a can of Coke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not so bad.
From the way the headline read, my first though was that they would actually do product placement within the story.
So instead of King Arthur drinking a a glass of wine he'd be drinking a can of Coke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>DreamsAreOkToo</author>
	<datestamp>1246629900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except it doesn't work like that with ads. You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads.  You can pay $50 for Battlefield 1942, or you can pay $50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads.</p><p>Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except it does n't work like that with ads .
You can watch public television for free and get ads , or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads .
You can pay $ 50 for Battlefield 1942 , or you can pay $ 50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads.Ads increase profit for companies , they never decrease the price of products , except those offered for free ( like Google .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except it doesn't work like that with ads.
You can watch public television for free and get ads, or you can pay money to watch cable television and get ads.
You can pay $50 for Battlefield 1942, or you can pay $50 for Battlefield 2142 and get ads.Ads increase profit for companies, they never decrease the price of products, except those offered for free (like Google.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576675</id>
	<title>Re:Let them patent it</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1246629420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously.  It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee, which should discourage them.  Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon, claiming magazines with ads are prior art.  Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death.

</p><p>Except for Amazon of course, since they hold the patent.  But they can try it, and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it.  It'll tank, hard.  Nobody will want this.</p></div><p>That's the thing I don't understand, about all of these ideas.  None of them come from overwhelming customer demand.
<br> <br>
Am I to believe that no one EVER gives them any suggestions, feature requests, etc.?  Should I believe also that they never conduct any sort of market analysis, or hold focus groups, or otherwise try to find out what people already want so that they can come up with ways to meet that need?
<br> <br>
This is about control just like far too many things I hear about that come from either corporations or governments.  For just that reason, it deserves to fail.  Miserably.  The problem is that there seems to be a long-standing tradition involving inherently failed ideas:  when they don't work out, the perpetrator responds by trying harder instead of recognizing that the idea is a failed idea.
<br> <br>
I would like to find a reason not to agree with Bill Hicks and what he said marketers should do ("there's no fuckin' joke"), but I can't.  "Ooooh, the anti-marketing dollar, that's a huge market<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."  "OOOOOhhhh, the plea-for-sanity dollar, that's a HUGE market, HUGE!!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee , which should discourage them .
Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon , claiming magazines with ads are prior art .
Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death .
Except for Amazon of course , since they hold the patent .
But they can try it , and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it .
It 'll tank , hard .
Nobody will want this.That 's the thing I do n't understand , about all of these ideas .
None of them come from overwhelming customer demand .
Am I to believe that no one EVER gives them any suggestions , feature requests , etc. ?
Should I believe also that they never conduct any sort of market analysis , or hold focus groups , or otherwise try to find out what people already want so that they can come up with ways to meet that need ?
This is about control just like far too many things I hear about that come from either corporations or governments .
For just that reason , it deserves to fail .
Miserably. The problem is that there seems to be a long-standing tradition involving inherently failed ideas : when they do n't work out , the perpetrator responds by trying harder instead of recognizing that the idea is a failed idea .
I would like to find a reason not to agree with Bill Hicks and what he said marketers should do ( " there 's no fuckin ' joke " ) , but I ca n't .
" Ooooh , the anti-marketing dollar , that 's a huge market ... " " OOOOOhhhh , the plea-for-sanity dollar , that 's a HUGE market , HUGE ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
It means that anyone else with this idiotic idea will have to pay a royalty fee, which should discourage them.
Unless you want to fight a prior art campaign against Amazon, claiming magazines with ads are prior art.
Either way the money will discourage people from trying and this idea will die a lonely death.
Except for Amazon of course, since they hold the patent.
But they can try it, and then they can see for themselves just how great this idea is when they launch it.
It'll tank, hard.
Nobody will want this.That's the thing I don't understand, about all of these ideas.
None of them come from overwhelming customer demand.
Am I to believe that no one EVER gives them any suggestions, feature requests, etc.?
Should I believe also that they never conduct any sort of market analysis, or hold focus groups, or otherwise try to find out what people already want so that they can come up with ways to meet that need?
This is about control just like far too many things I hear about that come from either corporations or governments.
For just that reason, it deserves to fail.
Miserably.  The problem is that there seems to be a long-standing tradition involving inherently failed ideas:  when they don't work out, the perpetrator responds by trying harder instead of recognizing that the idea is a failed idea.
I would like to find a reason not to agree with Bill Hicks and what he said marketers should do ("there's no fuckin' joke"), but I can't.
"Ooooh, the anti-marketing dollar, that's a huge market ..."  "OOOOOhhhh, the plea-for-sanity dollar, that's a HUGE market, HUGE!!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576771</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246630440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target."</p></div></blockquote><p>
&nbsp; Target?! That's prime ad space for Trojan XXLs!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let sponsors have characters " As Captain 'Pizza Hut ' Ahab looked out over the sea , he saw her , Moby Dick , brought to you by Target .
"   Target ? !
That 's prime ad space for Trojan XXLs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let sponsors have characters "As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target.
"
  Target?!
That's prime ad space for Trojan XXLs!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28641941</id>
	<title>Nah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247132640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pre-chewed, ad-strewn industry content: rejected.<br>Artistically pure pirated content: sign me up!</p><p>Who -THE FUCK- do people think they are, when they believe they should alter someone's art and it could possibly be better? If you work in advertising.... fuck you. Get a job where you don't have to assrape the planet for increased revenue. Or stay in your job and be evil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pre-chewed , ad-strewn industry content : rejected.Artistically pure pirated content : sign me up ! Who -THE FUCK- do people think they are , when they believe they should alter someone 's art and it could possibly be better ?
If you work in advertising.... fuck you .
Get a job where you do n't have to assrape the planet for increased revenue .
Or stay in your job and be evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pre-chewed, ad-strewn industry content: rejected.Artistically pure pirated content: sign me up!Who -THE FUCK- do people think they are, when they believe they should alter someone's art and it could possibly be better?
If you work in advertising.... fuck you.
Get a job where you don't have to assrape the planet for increased revenue.
Or stay in your job and be evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579309</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246712700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, what an innovative idea! Aren't patents supposed to go to new ideas? This wins a patent hands-down! In Hell!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , what an innovative idea !
Are n't patents supposed to go to new ideas ?
This wins a patent hands-down !
In Hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, what an innovative idea!
Aren't patents supposed to go to new ideas?
This wins a patent hands-down!
In Hell!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576939</id>
	<title>Re:Ads in books?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246632600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Want a Demonoid invite? That's where the coolest of the cool that torrent go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Want a Demonoid invite ?
That 's where the coolest of the cool that torrent go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want a Demonoid invite?
That's where the coolest of the cool that torrent go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581965</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>OldSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1246738740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I think this could be the showcase event for the free/low-cost advertising model vs pay.</p><p>The summary indicates that this would apply to "old/rare/out of print" books. I assume this may also be code for "copyright expired" books too. So... with no heirs to complain and multiple parties having access to the same material, we could have a show down.</p><p>Now what would you rather have? Pay $5.00 (say) for a Dickens work sans adverts or pay "$0.00" for the same thing with tacky ads thrown in? The market can decide this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think this could be the showcase event for the free/low-cost advertising model vs pay.The summary indicates that this would apply to " old/rare/out of print " books .
I assume this may also be code for " copyright expired " books too .
So... with no heirs to complain and multiple parties having access to the same material , we could have a show down.Now what would you rather have ?
Pay $ 5.00 ( say ) for a Dickens work sans adverts or pay " $ 0.00 " for the same thing with tacky ads thrown in ?
The market can decide this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think this could be the showcase event for the free/low-cost advertising model vs pay.The summary indicates that this would apply to "old/rare/out of print" books.
I assume this may also be code for "copyright expired" books too.
So... with no heirs to complain and multiple parties having access to the same material, we could have a show down.Now what would you rather have?
Pay $5.00 (say) for a Dickens work sans adverts or pay "$0.00" for the same thing with tacky ads thrown in?
The market can decide this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576527</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246627920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I'd like to "adapt" the inventor's <i>face</i> to the realities of modern marketing... With a cluebat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'd like to " adapt " the inventor 's face to the realities of modern marketing... With a cluebat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'd like to "adapt" the inventor's face to the realities of modern marketing... With a cluebat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576915</id>
	<title>What they really want</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1246632180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is a kick in the teeth. Good way to lose business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is a kick in the teeth .
Good way to lose business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is a kick in the teeth.
Good way to lose business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579143</id>
	<title>Re:Sick of ads</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1246709100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, I'll take lower quality before DRM any day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I 'll take lower quality before DRM any day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I'll take lower quality before DRM any day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576941</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1246632600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must not buy many books, or more likely, you don't remember.  I have three books here on my desk, and one of them is covered on the back with advertisements for other related technical books.  Lots of books do this, it's not particularly new.  As long as they don't try to manipulate, deceive, or annoy me I am fine with them.  Good advertising is good: it lets you know about something you might be interested in.  Bad advertising is deceptive and in your face.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must not buy many books , or more likely , you do n't remember .
I have three books here on my desk , and one of them is covered on the back with advertisements for other related technical books .
Lots of books do this , it 's not particularly new .
As long as they do n't try to manipulate , deceive , or annoy me I am fine with them .
Good advertising is good : it lets you know about something you might be interested in .
Bad advertising is deceptive and in your face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must not buy many books, or more likely, you don't remember.
I have three books here on my desk, and one of them is covered on the back with advertisements for other related technical books.
Lots of books do this, it's not particularly new.
As long as they don't try to manipulate, deceive, or annoy me I am fine with them.
Good advertising is good: it lets you know about something you might be interested in.
Bad advertising is deceptive and in your face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579083</id>
	<title>Am I missing something?</title>
	<author>clickclickdrone</author>
	<datestamp>1246708080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got books going back to the 1920's at least that have adverts at the back for various semi-related products. I've not seen ads in the main book text before but adverts in general have been there for quite some time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got books going back to the 1920 's at least that have adverts at the back for various semi-related products .
I 've not seen ads in the main book text before but adverts in general have been there for quite some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got books going back to the 1920's at least that have adverts at the back for various semi-related products.
I've not seen ads in the main book text before but adverts in general have been there for quite some time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28606519</id>
	<title>Even Better Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246974420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those smart suits should be given a HUGE bonus! Then immediately taken outside and shot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those smart suits should be given a HUGE bonus !
Then immediately taken outside and shot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those smart suits should be given a HUGE bonus!
Then immediately taken outside and shot...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28588141</id>
	<title>Ad-mania</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246827480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a complete outrage.  The most annoying thing about magazines is the difficulty in finding content between advertisements.  If literature will someday bombard me with marketing strategies as the rest of the world does, I may have to blind myself and give away all my possessions to wander the country as a bard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a complete outrage .
The most annoying thing about magazines is the difficulty in finding content between advertisements .
If literature will someday bombard me with marketing strategies as the rest of the world does , I may have to blind myself and give away all my possessions to wander the country as a bard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a complete outrage.
The most annoying thing about magazines is the difficulty in finding content between advertisements.
If literature will someday bombard me with marketing strategies as the rest of the world does, I may have to blind myself and give away all my possessions to wander the country as a bard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576585</id>
	<title>Re:Let them patent it</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1246628400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It wouldn't at all surprise me if somebody or somebodies, including the big guys, try hard to kill this one before it leaves the application phase.<br> <br>

A huge percentage of web pages these days are dynamically generated, on demand, and includes ads. This patent could, plausibly, be seen to cover that. First, that provides a giant helping of prior art. Second, it means that there are loads of big serious companies who Amazon could theoretically go after if they got this patent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would n't at all surprise me if somebody or somebodies , including the big guys , try hard to kill this one before it leaves the application phase .
A huge percentage of web pages these days are dynamically generated , on demand , and includes ads .
This patent could , plausibly , be seen to cover that .
First , that provides a giant helping of prior art .
Second , it means that there are loads of big serious companies who Amazon could theoretically go after if they got this patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wouldn't at all surprise me if somebody or somebodies, including the big guys, try hard to kill this one before it leaves the application phase.
A huge percentage of web pages these days are dynamically generated, on demand, and includes ads.
This patent could, plausibly, be seen to cover that.
First, that provides a giant helping of prior art.
Second, it means that there are loads of big serious companies who Amazon could theoretically go after if they got this patent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576967</id>
	<title>Good thing the specify "on demand"</title>
	<author>Nyckname</author>
	<datestamp>1246633080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember ripping ads out of the center of paperbacks thirty years ago. Without "on demand" they'd have that pesky prior art thing to deal with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember ripping ads out of the center of paperbacks thirty years ago .
Without " on demand " they 'd have that pesky prior art thing to deal with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember ripping ads out of the center of paperbacks thirty years ago.
Without "on demand" they'd have that pesky prior art thing to deal with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577367</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>DavidD\_CA</author>
	<datestamp>1246638120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where does it say anywhere that they will be doing this for paid books?</p><p>Perhaps this is a way for them to get into the advertising business, while providing books for free, similar to the way Google delivers Maps, etc.</p><p>If it's an option to bring rare and out-of-print books to the masses, then why shoot it down?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where does it say anywhere that they will be doing this for paid books ? Perhaps this is a way for them to get into the advertising business , while providing books for free , similar to the way Google delivers Maps , etc.If it 's an option to bring rare and out-of-print books to the masses , then why shoot it down ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where does it say anywhere that they will be doing this for paid books?Perhaps this is a way for them to get into the advertising business, while providing books for free, similar to the way Google delivers Maps, etc.If it's an option to bring rare and out-of-print books to the masses, then why shoot it down?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577507</id>
	<title>Obligatory futurama</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246639740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?</p><p>Fry: Well, sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines and movies and at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and written in the sky. But not in dreams. No, sir-ee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leela : Did n't you have ads in the 20th century ? Fry : Well , sure , but not in our dreams .
Only on TV and radio .
And in magazines and movies and at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and written in the sky .
But not in dreams .
No , sir-ee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?Fry: Well, sure, but not in our dreams.
Only on TV and radio.
And in magazines and movies and at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and written in the sky.
But not in dreams.
No, sir-ee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578419</id>
	<title>prior art</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1246738980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The german Heyne Verlag used to insert adds with a similar technique into early BattleTech books. There was only one such add in them but it was so obtrusive that I swore never to buy the advertised product - an instant soup of some kind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The german Heyne Verlag used to insert adds with a similar technique into early BattleTech books .
There was only one such add in them but it was so obtrusive that I swore never to buy the advertised product - an instant soup of some kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The german Heyne Verlag used to insert adds with a similar technique into early BattleTech books.
There was only one such add in them but it was so obtrusive that I swore never to buy the advertised product - an instant soup of some kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576769</id>
	<title>Subject</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246630440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh, there'll be an Ad Block Plus for ebooks soon if this goes through. Just another reason to stay away from Amazon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh , there 'll be an Ad Block Plus for ebooks soon if this goes through .
Just another reason to stay away from Amazon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh, there'll be an Ad Block Plus for ebooks soon if this goes through.
Just another reason to stay away from Amazon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580485</id>
	<title>Marketers</title>
	<author>MoeDrippins</author>
	<datestamp>1246725960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am rapidly starting to think that "marketing" (and purveyors thereof) might well surpass the "evil quotient" of lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am rapidly starting to think that " marketing " ( and purveyors thereof ) might well surpass the " evil quotient " of lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am rapidly starting to think that "marketing" (and purveyors thereof) might well surpass the "evil quotient" of lawyers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581993</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>MarkAD88</author>
	<datestamp>1246739220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We can start with the marketers and then follow up with the MBAs and attorneys.  Once we're done with that I think we should rest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We can start with the marketers and then follow up with the MBAs and attorneys .
Once we 're done with that I think we should rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can start with the marketers and then follow up with the MBAs and attorneys.
Once we're done with that I think we should rest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579911</id>
	<title>Don't we have already enough advertisement?</title>
	<author>hviniciusg</author>
	<datestamp>1246720500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe how far corporations are willing to go to achieve a little extra income. As a previous posters has pointed we are already paying for books, I DON'T want advertisement on my books, period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe how far corporations are willing to go to achieve a little extra income .
As a previous posters has pointed we are already paying for books , I DO N'T want advertisement on my books , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe how far corporations are willing to go to achieve a little extra income.
As a previous posters has pointed we are already paying for books, I DON'T want advertisement on my books, period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578875</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246703640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>advertising OTHER BOOKS on the back cover or the last few pages is not what they mean (I assume).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>advertising OTHER BOOKS on the back cover or the last few pages is not what they mean ( I assume ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>advertising OTHER BOOKS on the back cover or the last few pages is not what they mean (I assume).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577077</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246634580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target."</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm posting anonymously because I don't want to be killed by the book mafiaa, but that would only make Moby Dick better.  I find it interesting that so many people use Moby Dick as an example of great literature, when it really really isn't.</p><p>There are so many great books that would be better examples.  Count of Monte Christo, Sea Wolf, Call of the Wild, Frankenstein, Farenheit 911, anything from Assimov, One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich...</p><p>basically every other book I was ever <i>asked</i> to read in school.</p><p>As for the advertisements, it won't ever go anywhere.  Hopefully, it get's use as a defense, to prevent people from doing it.  In any case, I highly doubt anyone would put up with it for a second.  Moby Dick aside, such actions would fundamentally ruin the experience of reading in general and would most certainly not be acceptable in an academic setting.</p><p>"Why did I get an F?"</p><p>"You did not read the REAL book"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" As Captain 'Pizza Hut ' Ahab looked out over the sea , he saw her , Moby Dick , brought to you by Target .
" I 'm posting anonymously because I do n't want to be killed by the book mafiaa , but that would only make Moby Dick better .
I find it interesting that so many people use Moby Dick as an example of great literature , when it really really is n't.There are so many great books that would be better examples .
Count of Monte Christo , Sea Wolf , Call of the Wild , Frankenstein , Farenheit 911 , anything from Assimov , One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich...basically every other book I was ever asked to read in school.As for the advertisements , it wo n't ever go anywhere .
Hopefully , it get 's use as a defense , to prevent people from doing it .
In any case , I highly doubt anyone would put up with it for a second .
Moby Dick aside , such actions would fundamentally ruin the experience of reading in general and would most certainly not be acceptable in an academic setting .
" Why did I get an F ?
" " You did not read the REAL book "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"As Captain 'Pizza Hut' Ahab looked out over the sea, he saw her, Moby Dick, brought to you by Target.
"I'm posting anonymously because I don't want to be killed by the book mafiaa, but that would only make Moby Dick better.
I find it interesting that so many people use Moby Dick as an example of great literature, when it really really isn't.There are so many great books that would be better examples.
Count of Monte Christo, Sea Wolf, Call of the Wild, Frankenstein, Farenheit 911, anything from Assimov, One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich...basically every other book I was ever asked to read in school.As for the advertisements, it won't ever go anywhere.
Hopefully, it get's use as a defense, to prevent people from doing it.
In any case, I highly doubt anyone would put up with it for a second.
Moby Dick aside, such actions would fundamentally ruin the experience of reading in general and would most certainly not be acceptable in an academic setting.
"Why did I get an F?
""You did not read the REAL book"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577591</id>
	<title>Re: No different to cable TV....</title>
	<author>darealpat</author>
	<datestamp>1246640940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is plenty different from cable tv. The media types are different as well as original method of content delivery, expectations by the consumers of the media, and lastly, the infringement on the flow of cognition within the reader, as originally planned by the (original) author/s and copyright holders.</p><p>Or were you being sarcastic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is plenty different from cable tv .
The media types are different as well as original method of content delivery , expectations by the consumers of the media , and lastly , the infringement on the flow of cognition within the reader , as originally planned by the ( original ) author/s and copyright holders.Or were you being sarcastic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is plenty different from cable tv.
The media types are different as well as original method of content delivery, expectations by the consumers of the media, and lastly, the infringement on the flow of cognition within the reader, as originally planned by the (original) author/s and copyright holders.Or were you being sarcastic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576845</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246631400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About Terry Fox<br>Terry Fox was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and raised in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, a community near Vancouver on Canada's west coast. An active teenager involved in many sports, Terry was only 18 years old when he was diagnosed with osteogenic sarcoma (bone cancer) and forced to have his right leg amputated 15 centimetres (six inches) above the knee in 1977.</p><p>While in hospital, Terry was so overcome by the suffering of other cancer patients, many of them young children, that he decided to run across Canada to raise money for cancer research.</p><p>He would call his journey the Marathon of Hope.</p><p>After 18 months and running over 5,000 kilometres (3,107 miles) to prepare, Terry started his run in St. John's, Newfoundland on April 12, 1980 with little fanfare. Although it was difficult to garner attention in the beginning, enthusiasm soon grew, and the money collected along his route began to mount. He ran 42 kilometres (26 miles) a day through Canada's Atlantic provinces, Quebec and Ontario.</p><p>It was a journey that Canadians never forgot.</p><p>However, on September 1st, after 143 days and 5,373 kilometres (3,339 miles), Terry was forced to stop running outside of Thunder Bay, Ontario because cancer had appeared in his lungs. An entire nation was stunned and saddened. Terry passed away on June 28, 1981 at age 22.</p><p>The heroic Canadian was gone, but his legacy was just beginning.</p><p>To date, more than $400 million has been raised worldwide for cancer research in Terry's name through the annual Terry Fox Run, held across Canada and around the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About Terry FoxTerry Fox was born in Winnipeg , Manitoba , and raised in Port Coquitlam , British Columbia , a community near Vancouver on Canada 's west coast .
An active teenager involved in many sports , Terry was only 18 years old when he was diagnosed with osteogenic sarcoma ( bone cancer ) and forced to have his right leg amputated 15 centimetres ( six inches ) above the knee in 1977.While in hospital , Terry was so overcome by the suffering of other cancer patients , many of them young children , that he decided to run across Canada to raise money for cancer research.He would call his journey the Marathon of Hope.After 18 months and running over 5,000 kilometres ( 3,107 miles ) to prepare , Terry started his run in St. John 's , Newfoundland on April 12 , 1980 with little fanfare .
Although it was difficult to garner attention in the beginning , enthusiasm soon grew , and the money collected along his route began to mount .
He ran 42 kilometres ( 26 miles ) a day through Canada 's Atlantic provinces , Quebec and Ontario.It was a journey that Canadians never forgot.However , on September 1st , after 143 days and 5,373 kilometres ( 3,339 miles ) , Terry was forced to stop running outside of Thunder Bay , Ontario because cancer had appeared in his lungs .
An entire nation was stunned and saddened .
Terry passed away on June 28 , 1981 at age 22.The heroic Canadian was gone , but his legacy was just beginning.To date , more than $ 400 million has been raised worldwide for cancer research in Terry 's name through the annual Terry Fox Run , held across Canada and around the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About Terry FoxTerry Fox was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and raised in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, a community near Vancouver on Canada's west coast.
An active teenager involved in many sports, Terry was only 18 years old when he was diagnosed with osteogenic sarcoma (bone cancer) and forced to have his right leg amputated 15 centimetres (six inches) above the knee in 1977.While in hospital, Terry was so overcome by the suffering of other cancer patients, many of them young children, that he decided to run across Canada to raise money for cancer research.He would call his journey the Marathon of Hope.After 18 months and running over 5,000 kilometres (3,107 miles) to prepare, Terry started his run in St. John's, Newfoundland on April 12, 1980 with little fanfare.
Although it was difficult to garner attention in the beginning, enthusiasm soon grew, and the money collected along his route began to mount.
He ran 42 kilometres (26 miles) a day through Canada's Atlantic provinces, Quebec and Ontario.It was a journey that Canadians never forgot.However, on September 1st, after 143 days and 5,373 kilometres (3,339 miles), Terry was forced to stop running outside of Thunder Bay, Ontario because cancer had appeared in his lungs.
An entire nation was stunned and saddened.
Terry passed away on June 28, 1981 at age 22.The heroic Canadian was gone, but his legacy was just beginning.To date, more than $400 million has been raised worldwide for cancer research in Terry's name through the annual Terry Fox Run, held across Canada and around the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577059</id>
	<title>There Were Ads in Books in the 80s</title>
	<author>miller60</author>
	<datestamp>1246634340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if this serves as prior art re e-books, but Chris Whittle was including ads in books in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/18/business/the-media-business-new-whittle-experiment-books.html" title="nytimes.com">late 1980s</a> [nytimes.com], before Amazon was launched and e-books existed in a meaningful commercial form.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if this serves as prior art re e-books , but Chris Whittle was including ads in books in the late 1980s [ nytimes.com ] , before Amazon was launched and e-books existed in a meaningful commercial form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if this serves as prior art re e-books, but Chris Whittle was including ads in books in the late 1980s [nytimes.com], before Amazon was launched and e-books existed in a meaningful commercial form.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578729</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1246700580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased.</i></p><p>Most of the books I've purchased recently have anywhere from 3-10 pages of ads at the back.  One of them had a really annoying ad on a thick sheet of card inserted in the middle of the book (Making Money, Terry Pratchett, Corgi Books paperback edition; the ad was for Pratchett's next book and gave details of how to preorder it via Tesco's web site... I don't know whether or not only copies sold by Tesco had this insertion).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased.Most of the books I 've purchased recently have anywhere from 3-10 pages of ads at the back .
One of them had a really annoying ad on a thick sheet of card inserted in the middle of the book ( Making Money , Terry Pratchett , Corgi Books paperback edition ; the ad was for Pratchett 's next book and gave details of how to preorder it via Tesco 's web site... I do n't know whether or not only copies sold by Tesco had this insertion ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont really ever remember seeing and advertisement in ANY BOOK I have ever purchased.Most of the books I've purchased recently have anywhere from 3-10 pages of ads at the back.
One of them had a really annoying ad on a thick sheet of card inserted in the middle of the book (Making Money, Terry Pratchett, Corgi Books paperback edition; the ad was for Pratchett's next book and gave details of how to preorder it via Tesco's web site... I don't know whether or not only copies sold by Tesco had this insertion).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577999</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246646040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer.</i> </p><p>The Kindle has sold about 800,000 units. <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=20473" title="zdnet.com">Analyst: Kindle to reach 10 percent of Amazon's customer base</a> [zdnet.com] [June 30]</p><p> <i>The vast majority of Kindle downloads are indeed priced at $9.99 or less (and a third of them are freebies)<br>Amazon is subsidizing the cost of those $9.99 books, which means they're just barely profitable.<br>Bernstein analysts Claudio estimate that Jeff Bezos and company record an operating profit of 61 cents on each $9.99 e-book they sell. But a $24.95 hardcover generates $4.25 in operating profit. That's a 7 to 1 ratio, and that can't continue, indefinitely.</i> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090619/like-your-kindle-books-cheap-dont-get-too-used-to-it/" title="allthingsd.com">Like Your Kindle Books Cheap? Don't Get Too Used to It</a> [allthingsd.com] [June 19]</p><p>"Free Beer" is a time-honored way to build a market. But you can't freely distribute a third of your product - 100,000 titles - over the cell phone network and expect hardware sales to cover the bill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer .
The Kindle has sold about 800,000 units .
Analyst : Kindle to reach 10 percent of Amazon 's customer base [ zdnet.com ] [ June 30 ] The vast majority of Kindle downloads are indeed priced at $ 9.99 or less ( and a third of them are freebies ) Amazon is subsidizing the cost of those $ 9.99 books , which means they 're just barely profitable.Bernstein analysts Claudio estimate that Jeff Bezos and company record an operating profit of 61 cents on each $ 9.99 e-book they sell .
But a $ 24.95 hardcover generates $ 4.25 in operating profit .
That 's a 7 to 1 ratio , and that ca n't continue , indefinitely .
Like Your Kindle Books Cheap ?
Do n't Get Too Used to It [ allthingsd.com ] [ June 19 ] " Free Beer " is a time-honored way to build a market .
But you ca n't freely distribute a third of your product - 100,000 titles - over the cell phone network and expect hardware sales to cover the bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck with digital distribution why even have ads on free stuff because the price of the device itself more than makes up for the minuscule price of transfer.
The Kindle has sold about 800,000 units.
Analyst: Kindle to reach 10 percent of Amazon's customer base [zdnet.com] [June 30] The vast majority of Kindle downloads are indeed priced at $9.99 or less (and a third of them are freebies)Amazon is subsidizing the cost of those $9.99 books, which means they're just barely profitable.Bernstein analysts Claudio estimate that Jeff Bezos and company record an operating profit of 61 cents on each $9.99 e-book they sell.
But a $24.95 hardcover generates $4.25 in operating profit.
That's a 7 to 1 ratio, and that can't continue, indefinitely.
Like Your Kindle Books Cheap?
Don't Get Too Used to It [allthingsd.com] [June 19]"Free Beer" is a time-honored way to build a market.
But you can't freely distribute a third of your product - 100,000 titles - over the cell phone network and expect hardware sales to cover the bill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1246627800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is totally pointless. I mean, if you already paid for the book, why should there have to be ads?</p></div></blockquote><p>I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of "paying twice". It's not that you're being asked to pay again, it's that you didn't fully "pay" the first time. It'd be like buying a $10 product and paying $5 up-front, and having the other $5 paid by advertising it shows.

</p><p>That aside, isn't this patent a good thing? It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is totally pointless .
I mean , if you already paid for the book , why should there have to be ads ? I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of " paying twice " .
It 's not that you 're being asked to pay again , it 's that you did n't fully " pay " the first time .
It 'd be like buying a $ 10 product and paying $ 5 up-front , and having the other $ 5 paid by advertising it shows .
That aside , is n't this patent a good thing ?
It means that only Amazon 's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is totally pointless.
I mean, if you already paid for the book, why should there have to be ads?I keep seeing this faulty argument involving the concept of "paying twice".
It's not that you're being asked to pay again, it's that you didn't fully "pay" the first time.
It'd be like buying a $10 product and paying $5 up-front, and having the other $5 paid by advertising it shows.
That aside, isn't this patent a good thing?
It means that only Amazon's products will be crippled with advertising inserted in this manner.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576963</id>
	<title>Re:Google itself can't find relevant ads for class</title>
	<author>GryMor</author>
	<datestamp>1246633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just pulled an paperback from 2003 off of my shelf, it has the following ads in the back:<br>Mercedes Lackey (19 distinct books)<br>Eric Flint (15 distinct books)<br>Classic  Masters of Science Fiction Back in print! (15 distinct books)<br>A page for 1632 and 1633<br>Mary Brown (5 distinct books)<br>Amazons 'r Us (The Chicks Series, 5 distinct books)<br>Harry Turtledove  (7 distinct books)<br>Doranna Durgin's Fantasy (6 distinct books)<br>Andre Norton (5 distinct books)<br>Baen's Bar!</p><p>So, at least for fiction it seems to be normal to have ads for the other books of the authors (this was 'The Shadow of The Lion' by Mercedes Lackey, Eric Flint nad David Freer), other authors from the same publisher and some additional resources from the publisher.</p><p>If for example, Amazon were to insert ads for other HP Lovecraft books into the back of an HP Lovecraft book along with books inspired by the Mythos, this seems reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just pulled an paperback from 2003 off of my shelf , it has the following ads in the back : Mercedes Lackey ( 19 distinct books ) Eric Flint ( 15 distinct books ) Classic Masters of Science Fiction Back in print !
( 15 distinct books ) A page for 1632 and 1633Mary Brown ( 5 distinct books ) Amazons 'r Us ( The Chicks Series , 5 distinct books ) Harry Turtledove ( 7 distinct books ) Doranna Durgin 's Fantasy ( 6 distinct books ) Andre Norton ( 5 distinct books ) Baen 's Bar ! So , at least for fiction it seems to be normal to have ads for the other books of the authors ( this was 'The Shadow of The Lion ' by Mercedes Lackey , Eric Flint nad David Freer ) , other authors from the same publisher and some additional resources from the publisher.If for example , Amazon were to insert ads for other HP Lovecraft books into the back of an HP Lovecraft book along with books inspired by the Mythos , this seems reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just pulled an paperback from 2003 off of my shelf, it has the following ads in the back:Mercedes Lackey (19 distinct books)Eric Flint (15 distinct books)Classic  Masters of Science Fiction Back in print!
(15 distinct books)A page for 1632 and 1633Mary Brown (5 distinct books)Amazons 'r Us (The Chicks Series, 5 distinct books)Harry Turtledove  (7 distinct books)Doranna Durgin's Fantasy (6 distinct books)Andre Norton (5 distinct books)Baen's Bar!So, at least for fiction it seems to be normal to have ads for the other books of the authors (this was 'The Shadow of The Lion' by Mercedes Lackey, Eric Flint nad David Freer), other authors from the same publisher and some additional resources from the publisher.If for example, Amazon were to insert ads for other HP Lovecraft books into the back of an HP Lovecraft book along with books inspired by the Mythos, this seems reasonable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578705</id>
	<title>Re:Attn: Amazon - BOOKS DO NOT HAVE ADS!</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1246700220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey man, if it's good enough for Batman, it's good enough for Shake Spear!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey man , if it 's good enough for Batman , it 's good enough for Shake Spear ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey man, if it's good enough for Batman, it's good enough for Shake Spear!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477</id>
	<title>Google itself can't find relevant ads for classics</title>
	<author>dpbsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1246627500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer. Cave tours? Paint companies? Anatomy textbooks? But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on "Tom Sawyer."</p><p>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in "The Pit and the Pendulum." Rat poison? Grandfather clocks? Surcingles... whatever a surcingle is? But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on "The Pit and the Pendulum."</p><p>"To Kill a Mockingbird?" No paid links. "Gargantua and Pantagruel?" No paid links. "Lolita?" No paid links.</p><p>Inserting relevant advertising into books may be sooner said than done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer .
Cave tours ?
Paint companies ?
Anatomy textbooks ?
But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on " Tom Sawyer .
" I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in " The Pit and the Pendulum .
" Rat poison ?
Grandfather clocks ?
Surcingles... whatever a surcingle is ?
But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on " The Pit and the Pendulum .
" " To Kill a Mockingbird ?
" No paid links .
" Gargantua and Pantagruel ?
" No paid links .
" Lolita ? " No paid links.Inserting relevant advertising into books may be sooner said than done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in Tom Sawyer.
Cave tours?
Paint companies?
Anatomy textbooks?
But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on "Tom Sawyer.
"I wondered what sorts of ads Google would put in "The Pit and the Pendulum.
" Rat poison?
Grandfather clocks?
Surcingles... whatever a surcingle is?
But I see that Google itself offers no paid links when I search on "The Pit and the Pendulum.
""To Kill a Mockingbird?
" No paid links.
"Gargantua and Pantagruel?
" No paid links.
"Lolita?" No paid links.Inserting relevant advertising into books may be sooner said than done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580769</id>
	<title>It's one of those bad ideas...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246728360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a book, Adding unrelated content breaks the flow of the story. Its like having someone trying to draw your attention away from it all the time. This has all the making of a copyright violation. Art disfigurement is one of the only copyright violation that the AUTHOR can sue for regardless of who owns the art.</p><p>Amazon isn't the owner of the art, so imagine what happens next....Footgun time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a book , Adding unrelated content breaks the flow of the story .
Its like having someone trying to draw your attention away from it all the time .
This has all the making of a copyright violation .
Art disfigurement is one of the only copyright violation that the AUTHOR can sue for regardless of who owns the art.Amazon is n't the owner of the art , so imagine what happens next....Footgun time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a book, Adding unrelated content breaks the flow of the story.
Its like having someone trying to draw your attention away from it all the time.
This has all the making of a copyright violation.
Art disfigurement is one of the only copyright violation that the AUTHOR can sue for regardless of who owns the art.Amazon isn't the owner of the art, so imagine what happens next....Footgun time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577283</id>
	<title>Give them the patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246637280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sincerely hope they get to patent it. Just so THEY can sue the fuck out of anyone else doing it. Limit the damage to one publisher, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sincerely hope they get to patent it .
Just so THEY can sue the fuck out of anyone else doing it .
Limit the damage to one publisher , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sincerely hope they get to patent it.
Just so THEY can sue the fuck out of anyone else doing it.
Limit the damage to one publisher, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576985</id>
	<title>Re:How Pointless....</title>
	<author>Gerzel</author>
	<datestamp>1246633440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well the ads will cut the cost for you the consumer, at least that is what they will tell you.</p><p>And besides they'll make sure there are no real alternatives to getting the book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the ads will cut the cost for you the consumer , at least that is what they will tell you.And besides they 'll make sure there are no real alternatives to getting the book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the ads will cut the cost for you the consumer, at least that is what they will tell you.And besides they'll make sure there are no real alternatives to getting the book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28582605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28588669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_03_2232256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577165
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28582605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576875
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576721
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579239
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578653
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578903
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576983
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578467
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576661
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579099
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576829
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576403
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576583
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28588669
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577077
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576543
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576997
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581993
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577773
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579203
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28581011
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576861
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578049
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28579343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28580147
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_03_2232256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28576941
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28578729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_03_2232256.28577367
</commentlist>
</conversation>
