<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_02_1621241</id>
	<title>Universal Lands Rights To <em>Asteroids</em> Movie</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1246555080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>It seems Universal Studios has won the highly sought-after <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content\_display/film/news/e3ic3a4730761c7eaf6aac2de4e28ef8e67">movie rights to the 1979 Atari game <em>Asteroids</em></a>. Disney's Matthew Lopez will be writing the adaptation, having previously worked on the scripts for Bedtime Stories, The Sorcerer's Apprentice and Race to Witch Mountain. The NY Times is <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/how-will-hollywood-ruin-the-asteroids-movie/">skeptical about Hollywood's ability</a> to do right by the 30-year-old game, already imagining what a director like Michael Bay would do with it: "In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel, two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang, and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro."</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems Universal Studios has won the highly sought-after movie rights to the 1979 Atari game Asteroids .
Disney 's Matthew Lopez will be writing the adaptation , having previously worked on the scripts for Bedtime Stories , The Sorcerer 's Apprentice and Race to Witch Mountain .
The NY Times is skeptical about Hollywood 's ability to do right by the 30-year-old game , already imagining what a director like Michael Bay would do with it : " In this $ 300 million , three-and-a-half hour spectacle , loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel , two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang , and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems Universal Studios has won the highly sought-after movie rights to the 1979 Atari game Asteroids.
Disney's Matthew Lopez will be writing the adaptation, having previously worked on the scripts for Bedtime Stories, The Sorcerer's Apprentice and Race to Witch Mountain.
The NY Times is skeptical about Hollywood's ability to do right by the 30-year-old game, already imagining what a director like Michael Bay would do with it: "In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel, two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang, and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562967</id>
	<title>Re:I don't know what is more ludicrous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246567380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget Bay.  I want to see <i>Ewe Boll</i> do this.</p><p>And we'll somehow wind up with something resembling Jet Set Willy.  With space zombies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget Bay .
I want to see Ewe Boll do this.And we 'll somehow wind up with something resembling Jet Set Willy .
With space zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget Bay.
I want to see Ewe Boll do this.And we'll somehow wind up with something resembling Jet Set Willy.
With space zombies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565165</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1246532640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Connect Four.<br>
<br>
The crystals of Am'Karoth, left behind by the Ancients 60 million years ago, can offer nearly unlimited power if four are arranged perfectly in a line. Humans begin searching for these crystals and find a large number of them orbiting the planet Jil'butor, but the Shiaz'Guth from the planet Ro'nak have also found these crystals and realize that their plan for galactic domination can only be stopped by these crystals. They also send teams to secure the crystals, and are willing to use violent force if necessary. A war erupts between the two factions and the crystals hold the key to victory - once alignment is attained, it will become possible to direct their energy directly at the enemy base, destroying it, or if the enemy reaches alignment first, the energy will be aimed directly at Earth. The protagonist, Matthew, is in a position where he alone can direct the crystals to fall to the planet due to his knowledge of ancient Egyptian and must prevent the Shiaz'Guth from aligning their crystals before the humans can align theirs. <br>
<br>
Yes, I just made that up on the spot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Connect Four .
The crystals of Am'Karoth , left behind by the Ancients 60 million years ago , can offer nearly unlimited power if four are arranged perfectly in a line .
Humans begin searching for these crystals and find a large number of them orbiting the planet Jil'butor , but the Shiaz'Guth from the planet Ro'nak have also found these crystals and realize that their plan for galactic domination can only be stopped by these crystals .
They also send teams to secure the crystals , and are willing to use violent force if necessary .
A war erupts between the two factions and the crystals hold the key to victory - once alignment is attained , it will become possible to direct their energy directly at the enemy base , destroying it , or if the enemy reaches alignment first , the energy will be aimed directly at Earth .
The protagonist , Matthew , is in a position where he alone can direct the crystals to fall to the planet due to his knowledge of ancient Egyptian and must prevent the Shiaz'Guth from aligning their crystals before the humans can align theirs .
Yes , I just made that up on the spot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Connect Four.
The crystals of Am'Karoth, left behind by the Ancients 60 million years ago, can offer nearly unlimited power if four are arranged perfectly in a line.
Humans begin searching for these crystals and find a large number of them orbiting the planet Jil'butor, but the Shiaz'Guth from the planet Ro'nak have also found these crystals and realize that their plan for galactic domination can only be stopped by these crystals.
They also send teams to secure the crystals, and are willing to use violent force if necessary.
A war erupts between the two factions and the crystals hold the key to victory - once alignment is attained, it will become possible to direct their energy directly at the enemy base, destroying it, or if the enemy reaches alignment first, the energy will be aimed directly at Earth.
The protagonist, Matthew, is in a position where he alone can direct the crystals to fall to the planet due to his knowledge of ancient Egyptian and must prevent the Shiaz'Guth from aligning their crystals before the humans can align theirs.
Yes, I just made that up on the spot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560885</id>
	<title>LORD would make a better movie</title>
	<author>nitehawk214</author>
	<datestamp>1246560780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Legend of the Red Dragon, of course. It could be the only movie where the badass hero gets a vd from the babe.</p><p>Actually, maybe that wouldn't make a good movie either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legend of the Red Dragon , of course .
It could be the only movie where the badass hero gets a vd from the babe.Actually , maybe that would n't make a good movie either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legend of the Red Dragon, of course.
It could be the only movie where the badass hero gets a vd from the babe.Actually, maybe that wouldn't make a good movie either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569925</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>SpooForBrains</author>
	<datestamp>1246620900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuckie Egg!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuckie Egg !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuckie Egg!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569853</id>
	<title>How about Tempest?</title>
	<author>Mad-Bassist</author>
	<datestamp>1246619700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was in my early teens (1982) and the movie "Tempest" came out, I remember a slightly younger kid in an arcade telling me, "It's nothing like the video game!"</p><p>I had to suppress laughter. Back then, the name of the movie did catch my eye, but I also knew the word meant "storm," so I figured it was a chick flick. Poor kid, hahahaha!</p><p>Asteroids the movie sounds lame to me, but you never know. If it had Larry the Cable Guy, the plot would involve foam rubber donuts...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in my early teens ( 1982 ) and the movie " Tempest " came out , I remember a slightly younger kid in an arcade telling me , " It 's nothing like the video game !
" I had to suppress laughter .
Back then , the name of the movie did catch my eye , but I also knew the word meant " storm , " so I figured it was a chick flick .
Poor kid , hahahaha ! Asteroids the movie sounds lame to me , but you never know .
If it had Larry the Cable Guy , the plot would involve foam rubber donuts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in my early teens (1982) and the movie "Tempest" came out, I remember a slightly younger kid in an arcade telling me, "It's nothing like the video game!
"I had to suppress laughter.
Back then, the name of the movie did catch my eye, but I also knew the word meant "storm," so I figured it was a chick flick.
Poor kid, hahahaha!Asteroids the movie sounds lame to me, but you never know.
If it had Larry the Cable Guy, the plot would involve foam rubber donuts...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565909</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Jafafa Hots</author>
	<datestamp>1246536840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Star Trek: The Movie: The Video Game: The Movie</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Trek : The Movie : The Video Game : The Movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Trek: The Movie: The Video Game: The Movie</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562003</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>askksa</author>
	<datestamp>1246564560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you mean Pac Man the movie? - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWL6j0SvqV0&amp;feature=fvst" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWL6j0SvqV0&amp;feature=fvst</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>you mean Pac Man the movie ?
- http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = fWL6j0SvqV0&amp;feature = fvst [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you mean Pac Man the movie?
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWL6j0SvqV0&amp;feature=fvst [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561173</id>
	<title>Re:Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1246561680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it'll be about a war in Flatland?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 'll be about a war in Flatland ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it'll be about a war in Flatland?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423</id>
	<title>Wait, astroids?</title>
	<author>grasshoppa</author>
	<datestamp>1246559400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks?  This would be the game with absolutely no back story, no plot, no "end game"....</p><p>On second thought, this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks ?
This would be the game with absolutely no back story , no plot , no " end game " ....On second thought , this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks?
This would be the game with absolutely no back story, no plot, no "end game"....On second thought, this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560795</id>
	<title>You got Asteroids?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246560480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but my dad does.</p><p>He can't even sit on the toilet some days.</p><p>(The movie reference really does not need to be specified here.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but my dad does.He ca n't even sit on the toilet some days .
( The movie reference really does not need to be specified here .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but my dad does.He can't even sit on the toilet some days.
(The movie reference really does not need to be specified here.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28572877</id>
	<title>It could work!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246643100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of you are assuming "action movie" but I could totally see this work as a really weird comedy. Picture Will Farell as a down on his luck fighter pilot charged with clearing asteroid fields out of the way of their fleet mothership. Add lots and lots of 80's video games references (humourously presented of course) and you got yourself the next geek sleeper hit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of you are assuming " action movie " but I could totally see this work as a really weird comedy .
Picture Will Farell as a down on his luck fighter pilot charged with clearing asteroid fields out of the way of their fleet mothership .
Add lots and lots of 80 's video games references ( humourously presented of course ) and you got yourself the next geek sleeper hit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of you are assuming "action movie" but I could totally see this work as a really weird comedy.
Picture Will Farell as a down on his luck fighter pilot charged with clearing asteroid fields out of the way of their fleet mothership.
Add lots and lots of 80's video games references (humourously presented of course) and you got yourself the next geek sleeper hit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562597</id>
	<title>Re:Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246566360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be the first feature film done entirely in vector graphics.  I can't wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be the first feature film done entirely in vector graphics .
I ca n't wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be the first feature film done entirely in vector graphics.
I can't wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567353</id>
	<title>Desert Bus</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1246546320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to suggest <em>Desert Bus,</em> but they already made <em>Speed,</em> so I guess Hollywood beat me to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to suggest Desert Bus , but they already made Speed , so I guess Hollywood beat me to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to suggest Desert Bus, but they already made Speed, so I guess Hollywood beat me to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561251</id>
	<title>Re:What's next?</title>
	<author>wagnerrp</author>
	<datestamp>1246561920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They already made that one a couple years ago... <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424823/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424823/</a> [imdb.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They already made that one a couple years ago... http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0424823/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already made that one a couple years ago... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424823/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565273</id>
	<title>Other hot film properties</title>
	<author>Atrox666</author>
	<datestamp>1246533120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm currently entertaining offers for a biopic of my navel lint.
This one has sequel written all over it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm currently entertaining offers for a biopic of my navel lint .
This one has sequel written all over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm currently entertaining offers for a biopic of my navel lint.
This one has sequel written all over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564955</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, astroids?</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1246531620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just lack vision. The video game tie in is going to be the real money maker. It'll be unlike anything seen before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just lack vision .
The video game tie in is going to be the real money maker .
It 'll be unlike anything seen before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just lack vision.
The video game tie in is going to be the real money maker.
It'll be unlike anything seen before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561939</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1246564200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lunar Lander.<br>Tempest<br>I would say Gyrus but it would have a great sound track if the producers of RollerBall didn't sue you. Yes I am kidding...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lunar Lander.TempestI would say Gyrus but it would have a great sound track if the producers of RollerBall did n't sue you .
Yes I am kidding.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lunar Lander.TempestI would say Gyrus but it would have a great sound track if the producers of RollerBall didn't sue you.
Yes I am kidding...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562755</id>
	<title>For reason beyond my comprehension...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246566660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I keep thinking boobs shaped astroids bouncing off each other and a ship shaped like a penis...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep thinking boobs shaped astroids bouncing off each other and a ship shaped like a penis.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep thinking boobs shaped astroids bouncing off each other and a ship shaped like a penis...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565463</id>
	<title>Re:Coming soon: Tetris, the movie!</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1246534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever see the movie Robot Jox? Ya, that bad.<nobr> <wbr></nobr><b>:(</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever see the movie Robot Jox ?
Ya , that bad .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever see the movie Robot Jox?
Ya, that bad.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28571139</id>
	<title>OH no!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246632840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh please don't!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh please do n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh please don't!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560217</id>
	<title>Bay Splosions!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Michael Bay would do with it: "In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>Asteroids crashing into each other<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... possibly causing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRS90V8BQGo" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">BAYSPLOSIONS</a> [youtube.com]!?  <br> <br>

P.S.  I feel a little guilty <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1285879&amp;cid=28515785" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">re-using the same thing</a> [slashdot.org] from last week but you know what they say--fight fire with fire!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Bay would do with it : " In this $ 300 million , three-and-a-half hour spectacle , loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another ... Asteroids crashing into each other ... possibly causing BAYSPLOSIONS [ youtube.com ] ! ?
P.S. I feel a little guilty re-using the same thing [ slashdot.org ] from last week but you know what they say--fight fire with fire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Bay would do with it: "In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another ... Asteroids crashing into each other ... possibly causing BAYSPLOSIONS [youtube.com]!?
P.S.  I feel a little guilty re-using the same thing [slashdot.org] from last week but you know what they say--fight fire with fire!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560567</id>
	<title>No, wait, this could work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246559820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'd have to change their revenue model, though. Instead of walking up to the movie theater and paving $10 (or more) for a ticket to watch ALL of the movie, you pay $.25 and then get to watch the first 3 minutes of the movie. Want more movie? Pay another quarter. And another. And another. And another.</p><p>There, that'd REALLY replicate the experience of Asteroids on the big-screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'd have to change their revenue model , though .
Instead of walking up to the movie theater and paving $ 10 ( or more ) for a ticket to watch ALL of the movie , you pay $ .25 and then get to watch the first 3 minutes of the movie .
Want more movie ?
Pay another quarter .
And another .
And another .
And another.There , that 'd REALLY replicate the experience of Asteroids on the big-screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'd have to change their revenue model, though.
Instead of walking up to the movie theater and paving $10 (or more) for a ticket to watch ALL of the movie, you pay $.25 and then get to watch the first 3 minutes of the movie.
Want more movie?
Pay another quarter.
And another.
And another.
And another.There, that'd REALLY replicate the experience of Asteroids on the big-screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28645313</id>
	<title>Trailer for Asteroids Movie now online</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247151300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scroll through towards the end of this video that went online today - <a href="http://snipurl.com/mgrt7" title="snipurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/mgrt7</a> [snipurl.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scroll through towards the end of this video that went online today - http : //snipurl.com/mgrt7 [ snipurl.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scroll through towards the end of this video that went online today - http://snipurl.com/mgrt7 [snipurl.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</id>
	<title>Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Weaselmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1246561560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok.  Try to come up with a video game - any video game - that would have a dumber movie premise.  Go ahead.  There are plenty of posts about this with people saying "no way this has to be a joke".  So let's try to top Hollywood here.  Let's try to come up with something <i>even dumber</i>.  Classic arcade or modern game, doesn't matter.

</p><p>We've already seen Pong in this thread.  That's a good one.  Post more like that.  Something dumber than <b>Asteroids: The Movie.</b>

</p><p> <i>If you can.</i>

</p><p>I'll start the bidding with <i>Marble Madness</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok. Try to come up with a video game - any video game - that would have a dumber movie premise .
Go ahead .
There are plenty of posts about this with people saying " no way this has to be a joke " .
So let 's try to top Hollywood here .
Let 's try to come up with something even dumber .
Classic arcade or modern game , does n't matter .
We 've already seen Pong in this thread .
That 's a good one .
Post more like that .
Something dumber than Asteroids : The Movie .
If you can .
I 'll start the bidding with Marble Madness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok.  Try to come up with a video game - any video game - that would have a dumber movie premise.
Go ahead.
There are plenty of posts about this with people saying "no way this has to be a joke".
So let's try to top Hollywood here.
Let's try to come up with something even dumber.
Classic arcade or modern game, doesn't matter.
We've already seen Pong in this thread.
That's a good one.
Post more like that.
Something dumber than Asteroids: The Movie.
If you can.
I'll start the bidding with Marble Madness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919</id>
	<title>Instead of Asteroids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246560900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of Asteroids, they should do <i>Star Raiders</i>, or maybe think outside of the "lets turn a video game into a movie" box that they're in, and make a movie of an actual story.  <i>The Ruum</i>, or <i>Gottlos</i> could make a decent movie.  Perhaps some of Saberhagen's <i>Berserker</i> stuff, or LeGuin's <i>Dragonriders of Pern</i>, or Heinlein's <i>The Moon is a Harsh Mistress</i>.<br> <br>
I guess the problem is that today's movie executives grew up watching TV, playing video games, and reading comic books, instead of visiting a library.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of Asteroids , they should do Star Raiders , or maybe think outside of the " lets turn a video game into a movie " box that they 're in , and make a movie of an actual story .
The Ruum , or Gottlos could make a decent movie .
Perhaps some of Saberhagen 's Berserker stuff , or LeGuin 's Dragonriders of Pern , or Heinlein 's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress .
I guess the problem is that today 's movie executives grew up watching TV , playing video games , and reading comic books , instead of visiting a library .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of Asteroids, they should do Star Raiders, or maybe think outside of the "lets turn a video game into a movie" box that they're in, and make a movie of an actual story.
The Ruum, or Gottlos could make a decent movie.
Perhaps some of Saberhagen's Berserker stuff, or LeGuin's Dragonriders of Pern, or Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
I guess the problem is that today's movie executives grew up watching TV, playing video games, and reading comic books, instead of visiting a library.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561705</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>bledri</author>
	<datestamp>1246563480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakout\_(arcade\_game)" title="wikipedia.org">Breakout</a> [wikipedia.org] which is basically pong for people without friends.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breakout [ wikipedia.org ] which is basically pong for people without friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breakout [wikipedia.org] which is basically pong for people without friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560873</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>iron-kurton</author>
	<datestamp>1246560720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two words: Bruce Campbell</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words : Bruce Campbell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words: Bruce Campbell</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529</id>
	<title>Coming soon: Tetris, the movie!</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1246559760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, if it's half as good as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE\_1KlWFJyA" title="youtube.com">Tetris: The Movie</a> [youtube.com] I'll probably go see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if it 's half as good as Tetris : The Movie [ youtube.com ] I 'll probably go see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if it's half as good as Tetris: The Movie [youtube.com] I'll probably go see it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575925</id>
	<title>Re:Instead of Asteroids</title>
	<author>Walkingshark</author>
	<datestamp>1246622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After seeing them systematically slaughter every one of Heinlein's books they made into movies during the 90's, I'm not sure I want to see them ruin "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" as well. I mean, how the fuck do you make a Starship Troopers movie with no power armor?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After seeing them systematically slaughter every one of Heinlein 's books they made into movies during the 90 's , I 'm not sure I want to see them ruin " The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress " as well .
I mean , how the fuck do you make a Starship Troopers movie with no power armor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After seeing them systematically slaughter every one of Heinlein's books they made into movies during the 90's, I'm not sure I want to see them ruin "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" as well.
I mean, how the fuck do you make a Starship Troopers movie with no power armor?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347</id>
	<title>David Spade mode on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246559220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was a good movie idea when it was called Deep Impact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a good movie idea when it was called Deep Impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a good movie idea when it was called Deep Impact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561611</id>
	<title>And the problem is...?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1246563120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel, two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang, and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro.</i></p><p>And the problem with this would be... what? It's a frigging video game, for gods' sake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this $ 300 million , three-and-a-half hour spectacle , loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel , two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang , and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro.And the problem with this would be... what ? It 's a frigging video game , for gods ' sake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this $300 million, three-and-a-half hour spectacle, loud and expensive computer simulations of large boulders crashing into one another are briefly interrupted by the hilarious antics of Chip and Gravel, two living rocks with gold teeth who speak in hip-hop slang, and the nonstop shouting of John Turturro.And the problem with this would be... what? It's a frigging video game, for gods' sake!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1246562160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frogger.  There's just no way to make that movie that doesn't involve a frog.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frogger .
There 's just no way to make that movie that does n't involve a frog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frogger.
There's just no way to make that movie that doesn't involve a frog.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575887</id>
	<title>Re:This Enders Game (etc)??</title>
	<author>Walkingshark</author>
	<datestamp>1246622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't make Ender's game unless you do it animated. Imagine a movie about young children (5-9 year olds) with one or two adults in the whole thing that is as bloody and violent and stuff as what Card originally wrote. They'll either turn it into Spy Kids vs. Buggers or they'll bump up the ages of everyone to high school age and then cast a bunch of young twentysomethings to play the characters. Think Shia Labouf as "18 year old" Ender Wiggin.</p><p>No, Ender's Game, if it is ever made, needs to be a totally CGI movie, and ideally it'd be 3D for those battle room scenes (imagine the vertigo of "the enemy gate is down" in digital 3D). Sadly, if they ever do it they'll fuck it up even worse than they fucked up Starship Troopers and The Puppet Masters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't make Ender 's game unless you do it animated .
Imagine a movie about young children ( 5-9 year olds ) with one or two adults in the whole thing that is as bloody and violent and stuff as what Card originally wrote .
They 'll either turn it into Spy Kids vs. Buggers or they 'll bump up the ages of everyone to high school age and then cast a bunch of young twentysomethings to play the characters .
Think Shia Labouf as " 18 year old " Ender Wiggin.No , Ender 's Game , if it is ever made , needs to be a totally CGI movie , and ideally it 'd be 3D for those battle room scenes ( imagine the vertigo of " the enemy gate is down " in digital 3D ) .
Sadly , if they ever do it they 'll fuck it up even worse than they fucked up Starship Troopers and The Puppet Masters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't make Ender's game unless you do it animated.
Imagine a movie about young children (5-9 year olds) with one or two adults in the whole thing that is as bloody and violent and stuff as what Card originally wrote.
They'll either turn it into Spy Kids vs. Buggers or they'll bump up the ages of everyone to high school age and then cast a bunch of young twentysomethings to play the characters.
Think Shia Labouf as "18 year old" Ender Wiggin.No, Ender's Game, if it is ever made, needs to be a totally CGI movie, and ideally it'd be 3D for those battle room scenes (imagine the vertigo of "the enemy gate is down" in digital 3D).
Sadly, if they ever do it they'll fuck it up even worse than they fucked up Starship Troopers and The Puppet Masters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560571</id>
	<title>Missed Opportunity</title>
	<author>parvin</author>
	<datestamp>1246559880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twenty or twenty-five years ago, I would've been excited for a vector-based CGI feature film.

(The smoothness of vector graphics motion was unparalleled.  I loved my Vectrex!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twenty or twenty-five years ago , I would 've been excited for a vector-based CGI feature film .
( The smoothness of vector graphics motion was unparalleled .
I loved my Vectrex !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twenty or twenty-five years ago, I would've been excited for a vector-based CGI feature film.
(The smoothness of vector graphics motion was unparalleled.
I loved my Vectrex!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560599</id>
	<title>Old news!</title>
	<author>InfinityWpi</author>
	<datestamp>1246559940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geeze, guys, this is amazingly old news. Big, expensive movie about rocks that'll crash into each other unless they get blown up? I loved it when it came out the first time... when it was called Armageddon. And Deep Impact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geeze , guys , this is amazingly old news .
Big , expensive movie about rocks that 'll crash into each other unless they get blown up ?
I loved it when it came out the first time... when it was called Armageddon .
And Deep Impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geeze, guys, this is amazingly old news.
Big, expensive movie about rocks that'll crash into each other unless they get blown up?
I loved it when it came out the first time... when it was called Armageddon.
And Deep Impact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564963</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246531620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You remember the minigame from Mario 3, where you have to line up the three different pieces of the picture to form a star (or a mushroom, or a flower)?</p><p>Yeah. That.</p><p>On the other hand, Harvest Moon would make a great mockumentary if you're thrilled by farming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You remember the minigame from Mario 3 , where you have to line up the three different pieces of the picture to form a star ( or a mushroom , or a flower ) ? Yeah .
That.On the other hand , Harvest Moon would make a great mockumentary if you 're thrilled by farming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You remember the minigame from Mario 3, where you have to line up the three different pieces of the picture to form a star (or a mushroom, or a flower)?Yeah.
That.On the other hand, Harvest Moon would make a great mockumentary if you're thrilled by farming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570149</id>
	<title>Re:2D</title>
	<author>itschy</author>
	<datestamp>1246624440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Woah, man. That's deep man.That's deep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Woah , man .
That 's deep man.That 's deep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Woah, man.
That's deep man.That's deep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563527</id>
	<title>Re:creativity?</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1246525980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely.</i></p><p>Which is why DVRs and Turner Classic Movies is so great.</p><p>Instead of brain-jellowing crap, they (some, though, are more gender-specific or age-relevant than others) watch movies like <i>North By Northwest</i>, the 1948 <i>Three Musketeers</i>, any Marx Brothers movie, <i>Lassie Come Home</i>, <i>National Velvet</i>, <i>Bringing Up Baby</i>, the 1930s Perry Mason movies, <i>Flipper</i>, <i>Father Of The Bride</i> etc, etc.</p><p>In a year or so, I'll be introducing my oldest to movies like <i>Psyho</i>, <i>The Birds</i> and <i>Duel</i>.</p><p>But... since I'm not a complete stick in the mud, the do actually go see some modern movies, after my wife previews them.</p><p><i>The hero, a (wo)?man who overcame unjust adversity, saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individuality</i></p><p>Except for the woman part, that's been a general story motif for 2500 years.  <i>The Odyssey</i> springs first to mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely.Which is why DVRs and Turner Classic Movies is so great.Instead of brain-jellowing crap , they ( some , though , are more gender-specific or age-relevant than others ) watch movies like North By Northwest , the 1948 Three Musketeers , any Marx Brothers movie , Lassie Come Home , National Velvet , Bringing Up Baby , the 1930s Perry Mason movies , Flipper , Father Of The Bride etc , etc.In a year or so , I 'll be introducing my oldest to movies like Psyho , The Birds and Duel.But... since I 'm not a complete stick in the mud , the do actually go see some modern movies , after my wife previews them.The hero , a ( wo ) ? man who overcame unjust adversity , saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individualityExcept for the woman part , that 's been a general story motif for 2500 years .
The Odyssey springs first to mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely.Which is why DVRs and Turner Classic Movies is so great.Instead of brain-jellowing crap, they (some, though, are more gender-specific or age-relevant than others) watch movies like North By Northwest, the 1948 Three Musketeers, any Marx Brothers movie, Lassie Come Home, National Velvet, Bringing Up Baby, the 1930s Perry Mason movies, Flipper, Father Of The Bride etc, etc.In a year or so, I'll be introducing my oldest to movies like Psyho, The Birds and Duel.But... since I'm not a complete stick in the mud, the do actually go see some modern movies, after my wife previews them.The hero, a (wo)?man who overcame unjust adversity, saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individualityExcept for the woman part, that's been a general story motif for 2500 years.
The Odyssey springs first to mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567291</id>
	<title>Re:creativity?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1246545660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>Up</em> this year, <em>Wall-E</em> last year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Up this year , Wall-E last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Up this year, Wall-E last year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28568275</id>
	<title>Will Slashdot ever post something BEFORE Fark?</title>
	<author>Luke has no name</author>
	<datestamp>1246555020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever a story appears on both sites, I see it on the Fark headlines before I see it on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever a story appears on both sites , I see it on the Fark headlines before I see it on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever a story appears on both sites, I see it on the Fark headlines before I see it on /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562829</id>
	<title>2D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246566960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story is told from the point-of-view of the spacecraft's pilot.  But it's a two-dimensional universe, so the pilot sees nothing, because the lines he's looking at have no depth.</p><p>Let's grant some creative license and assume that the lines can be seen by the pilot.  His field of view is just a line, with line segments on it.  He needs to rotate around, looking at line segments.  If a line segment appears to be getting longer over time, it could mean that an asteroid is approaching, or it could be that the larger part of an asteroid is just rotating into view.  He fires at it, and the line segment breaks into two line segments, one of which is getting bigger, but drifting to the right, while the other gets smaller and smaller, apparently receding.  Or, maybe they're entirely different objects, it's hard to tell.</p><p>The pilot pushes the thrust button.  Some of the line segments shift their positions, some get longer, some get shorter.  He realizes that moving around just makes things more difficult to keep track of, and that it's better to stay in one place and rotate quickly.  But it's a lesson that's come too late; he's moving, and it's hard to stop.  He could spin around 180 degrees and try to slowly thrust to a stop, but that means losing vision in the direction he's moving for too long.  So he lays into the rotation control and starts firing blindly.  That, too, is a bad move; soon the line segments are everywhere.  And now, because there is so much variety in their absolute sizes, it's impossible to tell how close each one actually is.  It might be a small one about to smash into him, or it might be a big one far away.</p><p>Suddenly, two line segments of about equal size converge.  But they don't appear to be a threat because the converged segment is moving harmlessly to the right.  Suddenly, the segment becomes two, and the truth becomes sickeningly clear: an asteroid moving laterally past his field of vision was concealing another asteroid coming right at him.  He tries to rotate into firing position, but it's too late.  He's only been on the board for ten excruciating seconds, but at last his mission is over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story is told from the point-of-view of the spacecraft 's pilot .
But it 's a two-dimensional universe , so the pilot sees nothing , because the lines he 's looking at have no depth.Let 's grant some creative license and assume that the lines can be seen by the pilot .
His field of view is just a line , with line segments on it .
He needs to rotate around , looking at line segments .
If a line segment appears to be getting longer over time , it could mean that an asteroid is approaching , or it could be that the larger part of an asteroid is just rotating into view .
He fires at it , and the line segment breaks into two line segments , one of which is getting bigger , but drifting to the right , while the other gets smaller and smaller , apparently receding .
Or , maybe they 're entirely different objects , it 's hard to tell.The pilot pushes the thrust button .
Some of the line segments shift their positions , some get longer , some get shorter .
He realizes that moving around just makes things more difficult to keep track of , and that it 's better to stay in one place and rotate quickly .
But it 's a lesson that 's come too late ; he 's moving , and it 's hard to stop .
He could spin around 180 degrees and try to slowly thrust to a stop , but that means losing vision in the direction he 's moving for too long .
So he lays into the rotation control and starts firing blindly .
That , too , is a bad move ; soon the line segments are everywhere .
And now , because there is so much variety in their absolute sizes , it 's impossible to tell how close each one actually is .
It might be a small one about to smash into him , or it might be a big one far away.Suddenly , two line segments of about equal size converge .
But they do n't appear to be a threat because the converged segment is moving harmlessly to the right .
Suddenly , the segment becomes two , and the truth becomes sickeningly clear : an asteroid moving laterally past his field of vision was concealing another asteroid coming right at him .
He tries to rotate into firing position , but it 's too late .
He 's only been on the board for ten excruciating seconds , but at last his mission is over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story is told from the point-of-view of the spacecraft's pilot.
But it's a two-dimensional universe, so the pilot sees nothing, because the lines he's looking at have no depth.Let's grant some creative license and assume that the lines can be seen by the pilot.
His field of view is just a line, with line segments on it.
He needs to rotate around, looking at line segments.
If a line segment appears to be getting longer over time, it could mean that an asteroid is approaching, or it could be that the larger part of an asteroid is just rotating into view.
He fires at it, and the line segment breaks into two line segments, one of which is getting bigger, but drifting to the right, while the other gets smaller and smaller, apparently receding.
Or, maybe they're entirely different objects, it's hard to tell.The pilot pushes the thrust button.
Some of the line segments shift their positions, some get longer, some get shorter.
He realizes that moving around just makes things more difficult to keep track of, and that it's better to stay in one place and rotate quickly.
But it's a lesson that's come too late; he's moving, and it's hard to stop.
He could spin around 180 degrees and try to slowly thrust to a stop, but that means losing vision in the direction he's moving for too long.
So he lays into the rotation control and starts firing blindly.
That, too, is a bad move; soon the line segments are everywhere.
And now, because there is so much variety in their absolute sizes, it's impossible to tell how close each one actually is.
It might be a small one about to smash into him, or it might be a big one far away.Suddenly, two line segments of about equal size converge.
But they don't appear to be a threat because the converged segment is moving harmlessly to the right.
Suddenly, the segment becomes two, and the truth becomes sickeningly clear: an asteroid moving laterally past his field of vision was concealing another asteroid coming right at him.
He tries to rotate into firing position, but it's too late.
He's only been on the board for ten excruciating seconds, but at last his mission is over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560565</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246559820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>heck - even Pitfall or <b>Pac Man</b> would be better</p></div><p>Uh oh, now you've done it.  <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1688967" title="collegehumor.com" rel="nofollow">Here's the preview for Pac Man</a> [collegehumor.com].  Although, personally I liked <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHY8NKj3RKs" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">minesweeper</a> [youtube.com] more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be betterUh oh , now you 've done it .
Here 's the preview for Pac Man [ collegehumor.com ] .
Although , personally I liked minesweeper [ youtube.com ] more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be betterUh oh, now you've done it.
Here's the preview for Pac Man [collegehumor.com].
Although, personally I liked minesweeper [youtube.com] more.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563419</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, astroids?</title>
	<author>gstoddart</author>
	<datestamp>1246525620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks? This would be the game with absolutely no back story, no plot, no "end game"....</p><p>On second thought, this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, then it'll be a perfect gig for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0093051/" title="imdb.com">Uwe Boll</a> [imdb.com] to do then.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks ?
This would be the game with absolutely no back story , no plot , no " end game " ....On second thought , this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic.Well , then it 'll be a perfect gig for Uwe Boll [ imdb.com ] to do then .
: -PCheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we talking about the game where you had a little ship and you blew up computerized rocks?
This would be the game with absolutely no back story, no plot, no "end game"....On second thought, this sounds exactly like a Hollywood classic.Well, then it'll be a perfect gig for Uwe Boll [imdb.com] to do then.
:-PCheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570563</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Kr1ll1n</author>
	<datestamp>1246628880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yar's Revenge - 'nuff said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yar 's Revenge - 'nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yar's Revenge - 'nuff said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564565</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>Phu5ion</author>
	<datestamp>1246530060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Impressive.<br>*golf clap*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Impressive .
* golf clap *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impressive.
*golf clap*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561053</id>
	<title>Can't wait for the Game-Movie Tie in...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246561200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be great.  You'll probably be in a ship in space shooting rogue asteroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be great .
You 'll probably be in a ship in space shooting rogue asteroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be great.
You'll probably be in a ship in space shooting rogue asteroids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560541</id>
	<title>turn into a rock</title>
	<author>sadwings</author>
	<datestamp>1246559820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll go watch Apatow get stoned before I'd see Transformers 2, so at least one of those movies sounds like a money maker to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll go watch Apatow get stoned before I 'd see Transformers 2 , so at least one of those movies sounds like a money maker to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll go watch Apatow get stoned before I'd see Transformers 2, so at least one of those movies sounds like a money maker to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</id>
	<title>How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>netruner</author>
	<datestamp>1246559100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, really, really lame?  Even an action scene where they're having to blast oncoming rocks for any time longer than 10 seconds will be overkill.  It's not that I have no appreciation for the game, I played it in the 80's (the home version I rolled over the score twice in the same game while I had chicken pox).<br> <br>
There are many better games to make movies from.  (Deus Ex, Thief, Zelda, Golden Axe, heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , really , really lame ?
Even an action scene where they 're having to blast oncoming rocks for any time longer than 10 seconds will be overkill .
It 's not that I have no appreciation for the game , I played it in the 80 's ( the home version I rolled over the score twice in the same game while I had chicken pox ) .
There are many better games to make movies from .
( Deus Ex , Thief , Zelda , Golden Axe , heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, really, really lame?
Even an action scene where they're having to blast oncoming rocks for any time longer than 10 seconds will be overkill.
It's not that I have no appreciation for the game, I played it in the 80's (the home version I rolled over the score twice in the same game while I had chicken pox).
There are many better games to make movies from.
(Deus Ex, Thief, Zelda, Golden Axe, heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561851</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246563960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290039&amp;cid=28561671" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290039&amp;cid=28561671</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //games.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1290039&amp;cid = 28561671 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290039&amp;cid=28561671 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560345</id>
	<title>Backyard Movie Director....</title>
	<author>SomeoneGotMyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1246559220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could make a box office killing filming myself getting rid of centipedes in my backyard, using a BB gun.</p><p>Now to go and secure the rights.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could make a box office killing filming myself getting rid of centipedes in my backyard , using a BB gun.Now to go and secure the rights.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could make a box office killing filming myself getting rid of centipedes in my backyard, using a BB gun.Now to go and secure the rights.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259</id>
	<title>creativity?</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1246561920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood?  A regurgitation of a tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely.  The hero, a (wo)?man who overcame unjust adversity, saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individuality while wearing ray-bans and drinking red bull.</p><p>sigh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood ?
A regurgitation of a tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely .
The hero , a ( wo ) ? man who overcame unjust adversity , saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individuality while wearing ray-bans and drinking red bull.sigh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood?
A regurgitation of a tired cliches with spectacular effects and spin-off trinkits is more likely.
The hero, a (wo)?man who overcame unjust adversity, saves the day by combining natural talent with dogged individuality while wearing ray-bans and drinking red bull.sigh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581</id>
	<title>Re:I was seriously just thinking about that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246526160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really understand what you need to license.  Asteroids had two concepts:
<ul>
<li>There is a ship piloted by a human.</li>
<li>The ship needs to destroy asteroids and not crash into them.</li>
</ul><p>
In some versions there were also aliens you could shoot for more points.  Was it ever explained in the game why the ship was shooting asteroids?  Or who the aliens were?  Or where the asteroid field was?  Or, indeed, anything back-story related?  Surely you don't need to license anyone's IP to make a film which involves a ship shooting at asteroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really understand what you need to license .
Asteroids had two concepts : There is a ship piloted by a human .
The ship needs to destroy asteroids and not crash into them .
In some versions there were also aliens you could shoot for more points .
Was it ever explained in the game why the ship was shooting asteroids ?
Or who the aliens were ?
Or where the asteroid field was ?
Or , indeed , anything back-story related ?
Surely you do n't need to license anyone 's IP to make a film which involves a ship shooting at asteroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really understand what you need to license.
Asteroids had two concepts:

There is a ship piloted by a human.
The ship needs to destroy asteroids and not crash into them.
In some versions there were also aliens you could shoot for more points.
Was it ever explained in the game why the ship was shooting asteroids?
Or who the aliens were?
Or where the asteroid field was?
Or, indeed, anything back-story related?
Surely you don't need to license anyone's IP to make a film which involves a ship shooting at asteroids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561449</id>
	<title>Re:David Spade mode on</title>
	<author>7Prime</author>
	<datestamp>1246562580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Deep Impact</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>The same name as a proctology training film about treating patients with constipation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Deep Impact The same name as a proctology training film about treating patients with constipation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Deep Impact The same name as a proctology training film about treating patients with constipation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223</id>
	<title>I was seriously just thinking about that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, I was seriously just thinking about how great/stupid it would be to make a game out of asteroids last night. Seriously, the game had no story line, so you could be as creative as you wanted, but the movie would likely have NOTHING to do with the game other than the title and a few really crappy circumstances to call for a ship blowing up asteroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , I was seriously just thinking about how great/stupid it would be to make a game out of asteroids last night .
Seriously , the game had no story line , so you could be as creative as you wanted , but the movie would likely have NOTHING to do with the game other than the title and a few really crappy circumstances to call for a ship blowing up asteroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, I was seriously just thinking about how great/stupid it would be to make a game out of asteroids last night.
Seriously, the game had no story line, so you could be as creative as you wanted, but the movie would likely have NOTHING to do with the game other than the title and a few really crappy circumstances to call for a ship blowing up asteroids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563829</id>
	<title>Re:Top 10 Game To Movies Film (Rotten Tomatoes)</title>
	<author>arkhan\_jg</author>
	<datestamp>1246527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the list of movies to games is also going to have a huge amount of turkeys on it. I guess cynical cheap media tie-ins to get the impulse buyers is more profitable than doing things right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the list of movies to games is also going to have a huge amount of turkeys on it .
I guess cynical cheap media tie-ins to get the impulse buyers is more profitable than doing things right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the list of movies to games is also going to have a huge amount of turkeys on it.
I guess cynical cheap media tie-ins to get the impulse buyers is more profitable than doing things right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560461</id>
	<title>For max score shoot the Saucers</title>
	<author>RichMan</author>
	<datestamp>1246559520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You reduce the rocks to a minimal interference then shoot as many UFO's as you can.</p><p><a href="http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Asteroids/Walkthrough" title="strategywiki.org">http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Asteroids/Walkthrough</a> [strategywiki.org]</p><p>So this is going to be a space battle movie.</p><p>Actualy, I think they are going to blow it. Make space really small and have a dense set of rocks and lots of collisions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You reduce the rocks to a minimal interference then shoot as many UFO 's as you can.http : //strategywiki.org/wiki/Asteroids/Walkthrough [ strategywiki.org ] So this is going to be a space battle movie.Actualy , I think they are going to blow it .
Make space really small and have a dense set of rocks and lots of collisions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You reduce the rocks to a minimal interference then shoot as many UFO's as you can.http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Asteroids/Walkthrough [strategywiki.org]So this is going to be a space battle movie.Actualy, I think they are going to blow it.
Make space really small and have a dense set of rocks and lots of collisions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562923</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1246567260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the idea of universal land rights on asteroids.  Though I think an educational movie explaining it my be a little boring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea of universal land rights on asteroids .
Though I think an educational movie explaining it my be a little boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea of universal land rights on asteroids.
Though I think an educational movie explaining it my be a little boring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560675</id>
	<title>Really scraping the bottom of the barrel here</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1246560120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Hollywood is really stuck for ideas.  They've used up all the classic fables.  They've used up the better cartoon characters. They've gone though the action figures.  ("Transformers 2?" Coming up next, "GI Joe")  The better video games have been done.
</p><p>
Every once in a while there's a successful original ("Up" being the latest example) but that's rare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood is really stuck for ideas .
They 've used up all the classic fables .
They 've used up the better cartoon characters .
They 've gone though the action figures .
( " Transformers 2 ?
" Coming up next , " GI Joe " ) The better video games have been done .
Every once in a while there 's a successful original ( " Up " being the latest example ) but that 's rare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Hollywood is really stuck for ideas.
They've used up all the classic fables.
They've used up the better cartoon characters.
They've gone though the action figures.
("Transformers 2?
" Coming up next, "GI Joe")  The better video games have been done.
Every once in a while there's a successful original ("Up" being the latest example) but that's rare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560915</id>
	<title>If you've been in denial all this time:</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1246560900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mainstream Hollywood ran out of original ideas for movies quite some time ago. When? When they started turning to old, bad TV sitcoms and video games for movie ideas. This one? Got to be bottom of the barrel. I loved playing Asteroids and all, but this is NOT movie plot material! What's worse? It'll probably have the living SHIT marketed out of it, and they'll push for an Imax 3D release of it. I'm going to go puke now..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mainstream Hollywood ran out of original ideas for movies quite some time ago .
When ? When they started turning to old , bad TV sitcoms and video games for movie ideas .
This one ?
Got to be bottom of the barrel .
I loved playing Asteroids and all , but this is NOT movie plot material !
What 's worse ?
It 'll probably have the living SHIT marketed out of it , and they 'll push for an Imax 3D release of it .
I 'm going to go puke now. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mainstream Hollywood ran out of original ideas for movies quite some time ago.
When? When they started turning to old, bad TV sitcoms and video games for movie ideas.
This one?
Got to be bottom of the barrel.
I loved playing Asteroids and all, but this is NOT movie plot material!
What's worse?
It'll probably have the living SHIT marketed out of it, and they'll push for an Imax 3D release of it.
I'm going to go puke now..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560647</id>
	<title>This  Enders Game (etc)??</title>
	<author>RabidMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246560060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this gets made into a movie before something like Enders Game, I'm giving up completely on HollyWood.</p><p>I'm tired of seeing horrible movie after horrible movie come out, when there are fantastic stories waiting to be made into great movies (or, be done horribly, I'll concede).</p><p>Video game movies just don't work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this gets made into a movie before something like Enders Game , I 'm giving up completely on HollyWood.I 'm tired of seeing horrible movie after horrible movie come out , when there are fantastic stories waiting to be made into great movies ( or , be done horribly , I 'll concede ) .Video game movies just do n't work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this gets made into a movie before something like Enders Game, I'm giving up completely on HollyWood.I'm tired of seeing horrible movie after horrible movie come out, when there are fantastic stories waiting to be made into great movies (or, be done horribly, I'll concede).Video game movies just don't work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561701</id>
	<title>Re:I don't know what is more ludicrous</title>
	<author>duranaki</author>
	<datestamp>1246563420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd mod, but no points.  This was almost my exact thought.  I don't know what the "rights" even means.  I'm pretty sure I can make a movie called "Asteroids" about, you know, asteroids, without having to license it (if <a href="http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&amp;q=asteroids&amp;x=0&amp;y=0" title="imdb.com">this</a> [imdb.com] is any indication).  I'm not sure what else you get with the license... cheesy sound effects?  The use of italics?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd mod , but no points .
This was almost my exact thought .
I do n't know what the " rights " even means .
I 'm pretty sure I can make a movie called " Asteroids " about , you know , asteroids , without having to license it ( if this [ imdb.com ] is any indication ) .
I 'm not sure what else you get with the license... cheesy sound effects ?
The use of italics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd mod, but no points.
This was almost my exact thought.
I don't know what the "rights" even means.
I'm pretty sure I can make a movie called "Asteroids" about, you know, asteroids, without having to license it (if this [imdb.com] is any indication).
I'm not sure what else you get with the license... cheesy sound effects?
The use of italics?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564685</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246530540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDc3ZEKl-Wc" title="youtube.com">Gorillas.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gorillas .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gorillas.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</id>
	<title>Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1246558740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A movie about a triangle flying around blowing up jagged looking circles?<br><br>Sounds like a winner to me!!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarcasm</htmltext>
<tokenext>A movie about a triangle flying around blowing up jagged looking circles ? Sounds like a winner to me ! ! !
: D /sarcasm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A movie about a triangle flying around blowing up jagged looking circles?Sounds like a winner to me!!!
:D /sarcasm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562091</id>
	<title>Re:I was seriously just thinking about that.</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1246564860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, among other things if you want to stay true to the original game, every time a character disappears off one edge of the screen, they must immediately reappear at the opposite edge of the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , among other things if you want to stay true to the original game , every time a character disappears off one edge of the screen , they must immediately reappear at the opposite edge of the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, among other things if you want to stay true to the original game, every time a character disappears off one edge of the screen, they must immediately reappear at the opposite edge of the screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562209</id>
	<title>Minesweeper : The Movie</title>
	<author>ggambett</author>
	<datestamp>1246565220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't possibly be better than Minesweeper : The Movie! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHY8NKj3RKs" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHY8NKj3RKs</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't possibly be better than Minesweeper : The Movie !
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = LHY8NKj3RKs [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't possibly be better than Minesweeper : The Movie!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHY8NKj3RKs [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28623867</id>
	<title>Re:I was seriously just thinking about that.</title>
	<author>mcvos</author>
	<datestamp>1247073720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thoughts exactly.</p><p>A more interesting license would be PacMan. You've got this guy with a big mouth swallowing pills in a dark club with repetitive electronic music, while chased by some scary goons. Then he swallows a special pill and goes completely berserk, killing the goons. In the sequel he'll do exactly the same thing in a slightly differently shaped club. Only this time he's thinking of his health and occasionally eats some fruit in between the pills.</p><p>I guess it's a gangster story revolving around drugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly.A more interesting license would be PacMan .
You 've got this guy with a big mouth swallowing pills in a dark club with repetitive electronic music , while chased by some scary goons .
Then he swallows a special pill and goes completely berserk , killing the goons .
In the sequel he 'll do exactly the same thing in a slightly differently shaped club .
Only this time he 's thinking of his health and occasionally eats some fruit in between the pills.I guess it 's a gangster story revolving around drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.A more interesting license would be PacMan.
You've got this guy with a big mouth swallowing pills in a dark club with repetitive electronic music, while chased by some scary goons.
Then he swallows a special pill and goes completely berserk, killing the goons.
In the sequel he'll do exactly the same thing in a slightly differently shaped club.
Only this time he's thinking of his health and occasionally eats some fruit in between the pills.I guess it's a gangster story revolving around drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560525</id>
	<title>Real money</title>
	<author>slapout</author>
	<datestamp>1246559700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet the real money's gonna come from the iPhone app based on the movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the real money 's gon na come from the iPhone app based on the movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the real money's gonna come from the iPhone app based on the movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562607</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1246566360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would so much love to see a movie based on Castle Wolfenstein! The atmosphere of that game would make for a terrific sci-fi/horror.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would so much love to see a movie based on Castle Wolfenstein !
The atmosphere of that game would make for a terrific sci-fi/horror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would so much love to see a movie based on Castle Wolfenstein!
The atmosphere of that game would make for a terrific sci-fi/horror.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563289</id>
	<title>Re:I don't know what is more ludicrous</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1246525200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe while trying to do repairs on a frozen planet a tyrannical government attacks and the hero's are forced to flee before repairs are complete.  Once in space they find an asteroid field to hide in but are chased by other ships, and must maneuver around and shoot asteroids.  Maybe throw in a giant worm to add excitement and danger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe while trying to do repairs on a frozen planet a tyrannical government attacks and the hero 's are forced to flee before repairs are complete .
Once in space they find an asteroid field to hide in but are chased by other ships , and must maneuver around and shoot asteroids .
Maybe throw in a giant worm to add excitement and danger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe while trying to do repairs on a frozen planet a tyrannical government attacks and the hero's are forced to flee before repairs are complete.
Once in space they find an asteroid field to hide in but are chased by other ships, and must maneuver around and shoot asteroids.
Maybe throw in a giant worm to add excitement and danger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561781</id>
	<title>Pong</title>
	<author>dan\_sdot</author>
	<datestamp>1246563720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Hey, Hollywood:<br>
I'll sell you the right to PONG for $2.5 million.  <br> <br>
That is <i>sure</i> to be a box-office hit too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , Hollywood : I 'll sell you the right to PONG for $ 2.5 million .
That is sure to be a box-office hit too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Hey, Hollywood:
I'll sell you the right to PONG for $2.5 million.
That is sure to be a box-office hit too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563081</id>
	<title>Do right by what???</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1246567740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's one game that is completely geared for the average Hollywood scriptwriter, it's Asteroids.</p><p>(Background noise: bommmmp bommmmp bommmp)</p><p>SHIP: Pew pew pew!<br>ASTEROID: BOOM! CRASH!<br>SHIP: Pew pew pew pew pew!<br>ASTEROID: BANG! BAM! BOOM!<br>SHIP: Pew pew pew!<br>ASTEROID: BOOMF! BOOM! KERBLOOIE!</p><p>(Background noise increases pace: bomp bomp bomp bomp)</p><p>UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo Ooo Ooo!<br>SHIP: Woosh! Pew pew pew! Woosh!<br>UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo! Pewwww! Pewwww! Woo Ooo!<br>SHIP: Pew! Woosh! Pew pew! Woosh! Pew!</p><p>(Background noise even faster: bop bop bop bop bop bop)</p><p>UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo! BOOM!<br>SHIP: Woosh! Pew pew! BOOM!</p><p>(William Shatner delivers soliloquy on the pointlessness of war and violence)</p><p>(End credits: GAME OVER!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one game that is completely geared for the average Hollywood scriptwriter , it 's Asteroids .
( Background noise : bommmmp bommmmp bommmp ) SHIP : Pew pew pew ! ASTEROID : BOOM !
CRASH ! SHIP : Pew pew pew pew pew ! ASTEROID : BANG !
BAM ! BOOM ! SHIP : Pew pew pew ! ASTEROID : BOOMF !
BOOM ! KERBLOOIE !
( Background noise increases pace : bomp bomp bomp bomp ) UFO : Wooo Ooo Ooo Ooo Ooo ! SHIP : Woosh !
Pew pew pew !
Woosh ! UFO : Wooo Ooo Ooo !
Pewwww ! Pewwww !
Woo Ooo ! SHIP : Pew !
Woosh ! Pew pew !
Woosh ! Pew !
( Background noise even faster : bop bop bop bop bop bop ) UFO : Wooo Ooo Ooo !
BOOM ! SHIP : Woosh !
Pew pew !
BOOM ! ( William Shatner delivers soliloquy on the pointlessness of war and violence ) ( End credits : GAME OVER !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's one game that is completely geared for the average Hollywood scriptwriter, it's Asteroids.
(Background noise: bommmmp bommmmp bommmp)SHIP: Pew pew pew!ASTEROID: BOOM!
CRASH!SHIP: Pew pew pew pew pew!ASTEROID: BANG!
BAM! BOOM!SHIP: Pew pew pew!ASTEROID: BOOMF!
BOOM! KERBLOOIE!
(Background noise increases pace: bomp bomp bomp bomp)UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo Ooo Ooo!SHIP: Woosh!
Pew pew pew!
Woosh!UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo!
Pewwww! Pewwww!
Woo Ooo!SHIP: Pew!
Woosh! Pew pew!
Woosh! Pew!
(Background noise even faster: bop bop bop bop bop bop)UFO: Wooo Ooo Ooo!
BOOM!SHIP: Woosh!
Pew pew!
BOOM!(William Shatner delivers soliloquy on the pointlessness of war and violence)(End credits: GAME OVER!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575943</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Walkingshark</author>
	<datestamp>1246622520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Something dumber than Asteroids: The Movie.</p></div><p>No problem.</p><p>Food Channel Independent Movies Presents,</p><p>a Richard Linklater film,</p><p>Ben Afflek in:</p><p>Burger Time, the Movie</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something dumber than Asteroids : The Movie.No problem.Food Channel Independent Movies Presents,a Richard Linklater film,Ben Afflek in : Burger Time , the Movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something dumber than Asteroids: The Movie.No problem.Food Channel Independent Movies Presents,a Richard Linklater film,Ben Afflek in:Burger Time, the Movie
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563057</id>
	<title>Re:creativity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246567680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood?</p> </div><p>any pixar movie</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood ?
any pixar movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time a creative movie came from Hollywood?
any pixar movie
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562993</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>psybre</author>
	<datestamp>1246567440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... my vote is for Strider. Now that game had some bizarre action sequences.<br>
~psybre</htmltext>
<tokenext>... my vote is for Strider .
Now that game had some bizarre action sequences .
~ psybre</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... my vote is for Strider.
Now that game had some bizarre action sequences.
~psybre</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561803</id>
	<title>Re:Pong the Movie!</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1246563780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Preview:</p><p>"In a world gone mad..."<br>Bruce: There are two sides to this!<br>Samuel L. Jackson: Dammit, I know how to play the game!</p><p>"People cry out for justice..."<br>Vin Diesel: When it comes at you, you better be ready.<br>Uma Thurman: I'll send it right back at them!</p><p>"and there is only one way to turn..."<br>Patrick Stewart: Is there any point to this back and forth?<br>Joe Pesci: The point is to win, and I hate to lose.</p><p>[action music, explosions, car chases, screen fades to black]</p><p>Pong! (comming this summer to a theater near you)<br>[boop... boop... be-boop...]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Preview : " In a world gone mad... " Bruce : There are two sides to this ! Samuel L. Jackson : Dammit , I know how to play the game !
" People cry out for justice... " Vin Diesel : When it comes at you , you better be ready.Uma Thurman : I 'll send it right back at them !
" and there is only one way to turn... " Patrick Stewart : Is there any point to this back and forth ? Joe Pesci : The point is to win , and I hate to lose .
[ action music , explosions , car chases , screen fades to black ] Pong !
( comming this summer to a theater near you ) [ boop... boop... be-boop... ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Preview:"In a world gone mad..."Bruce: There are two sides to this!Samuel L. Jackson: Dammit, I know how to play the game!
"People cry out for justice..."Vin Diesel: When it comes at you, you better be ready.Uma Thurman: I'll send it right back at them!
"and there is only one way to turn..."Patrick Stewart: Is there any point to this back and forth?Joe Pesci: The point is to win, and I hate to lose.
[action music, explosions, car chases, screen fades to black]Pong!
(comming this summer to a theater near you)[boop... boop... be-boop...]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561785</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246563720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tetris. Really, pretty much any puzzle game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tetris .
Really , pretty much any puzzle game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tetris.
Really, pretty much any puzzle game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28568371</id>
	<title>Re:Top 10 Game To Movies Film (Rotten Tomatoes)</title>
	<author>stm2</author>
	<datestamp>1246556280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where it ranks "Super Mario Bros"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where it ranks " Super Mario Bros " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where it ranks "Super Mario Bros"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562641</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>The employee can cho</author>
	<datestamp>1246566420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you follow me around and then blog about my life?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you follow me around and then blog about my life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you follow me around and then blog about my life?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</id>
	<title>Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1246562580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine what Kubrick, rest his soul, could do with these rights. There would be wide shots of asteroid fields, set to Strauss - with a 4 and a half hour run time, all of it filmed in natural light, where the asteroids hitting each other come to represent the extensional angst of human interaction with each other, where the main characters fracture and come apart slightly, just like the rocks.<br> <br>
The end could be a 20 minute pyrotechnic hallucination, where we - the viewer - no longer understand if the little ship or the rocks themselves are the protgaganist - Haley Joel Osment could stand in as a lost teenager, piloting the ship - never knowing why he is shooting the rocks, or even if he is human. On the side of his ship is painted the words "Me love you long time...", being both a metaphor and a literal phrase of what the ship is doing to the rocks.

 <br> <br>
Later, we found out that a secret sex cult has arranged the rocks to bang into each other for the pleasure of its sadistic members, who wear masks shaped like big asteroids. Lee Ermey marches in and screams "what is your major malfunction, did mommy and daddy not show you enough love?" to the cult. and of course, the movie ends with a Malcom McDowell voiceover while we see Jack Nicholson frozen in place on the asteroid surface.<br> <br>
Oh Stanley - had you only been here to do it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine what Kubrick , rest his soul , could do with these rights .
There would be wide shots of asteroid fields , set to Strauss - with a 4 and a half hour run time , all of it filmed in natural light , where the asteroids hitting each other come to represent the extensional angst of human interaction with each other , where the main characters fracture and come apart slightly , just like the rocks .
The end could be a 20 minute pyrotechnic hallucination , where we - the viewer - no longer understand if the little ship or the rocks themselves are the protgaganist - Haley Joel Osment could stand in as a lost teenager , piloting the ship - never knowing why he is shooting the rocks , or even if he is human .
On the side of his ship is painted the words " Me love you long time... " , being both a metaphor and a literal phrase of what the ship is doing to the rocks .
Later , we found out that a secret sex cult has arranged the rocks to bang into each other for the pleasure of its sadistic members , who wear masks shaped like big asteroids .
Lee Ermey marches in and screams " what is your major malfunction , did mommy and daddy not show you enough love ?
" to the cult .
and of course , the movie ends with a Malcom McDowell voiceover while we see Jack Nicholson frozen in place on the asteroid surface .
Oh Stanley - had you only been here to do it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine what Kubrick, rest his soul, could do with these rights.
There would be wide shots of asteroid fields, set to Strauss - with a 4 and a half hour run time, all of it filmed in natural light, where the asteroids hitting each other come to represent the extensional angst of human interaction with each other, where the main characters fracture and come apart slightly, just like the rocks.
The end could be a 20 minute pyrotechnic hallucination, where we - the viewer - no longer understand if the little ship or the rocks themselves are the protgaganist - Haley Joel Osment could stand in as a lost teenager, piloting the ship - never knowing why he is shooting the rocks, or even if he is human.
On the side of his ship is painted the words "Me love you long time...", being both a metaphor and a literal phrase of what the ship is doing to the rocks.
Later, we found out that a secret sex cult has arranged the rocks to bang into each other for the pleasure of its sadistic members, who wear masks shaped like big asteroids.
Lee Ermey marches in and screams "what is your major malfunction, did mommy and daddy not show you enough love?
" to the cult.
and of course, the movie ends with a Malcom McDowell voiceover while we see Jack Nicholson frozen in place on the asteroid surface.
Oh Stanley - had you only been here to do it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569905</id>
	<title>Re:I was seriously just thinking about that.</title>
	<author>kamapuaa</author>
	<datestamp>1246620480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It gets you free hype on games.slashdot.com.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It gets you free hype on games.slashdot.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gets you free hype on games.slashdot.com.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561093</id>
	<title>I don't know...</title>
	<author>sunking2</author>
	<datestamp>1246561320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They did a pretty damned good job with Wing Commander<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>They did a pretty damned good job with Wing Commander : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did a pretty damned good job with Wing Commander :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562263</id>
	<title>just as long as...</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1246565400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm fine with this, just as long as they don't mess with the score. I can't wait for 2 hours of <i>that!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fine with this , just as long as they do n't mess with the score .
I ca n't wait for 2 hours of that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fine with this, just as long as they don't mess with the score.
I can't wait for 2 hours of that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560669</id>
	<title>Why rip John Turtorro?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246560120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean Turtorro was probably one of the better parts of Transformers 2. He was hysterical in my opinion. "I'm directly below the enemies testicles"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean Turtorro was probably one of the better parts of Transformers 2 .
He was hysterical in my opinion .
" I 'm directly below the enemies testicles "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean Turtorro was probably one of the better parts of Transformers 2.
He was hysterical in my opinion.
"I'm directly below the enemies testicles"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562141</id>
	<title>Re:Bay Splosions!</title>
	<author>evanbd</author>
	<datestamp>1246564980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everybody seems to be hating on the new Transformers movie, but really, the critics have it wrong.  In actuality, Michael Bay <a href="http://io9.com/5301898/michael-bay-finally-made-an-art-movie" title="io9.com">finally made an art movie</a> [io9.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody seems to be hating on the new Transformers movie , but really , the critics have it wrong .
In actuality , Michael Bay finally made an art movie [ io9.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody seems to be hating on the new Transformers movie, but really, the critics have it wrong.
In actuality, Michael Bay finally made an art movie [io9.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563439</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>spectralfreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Super Breakout: Revenge of the Bricks</htmltext>
<tokenext>Super Breakout : Revenge of the Bricks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Super Breakout: Revenge of the Bricks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560609</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>bhunachchicken</author>
	<datestamp>1246559940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>"There are many better games to make movies from. (Deus Ex, Thief, Zelda, Golden Axe, heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better)."</i> </p><p>Dude, you're forgetting one thing - this is Hollywood making a movie out of a game. It matters little how good the original game was, the result will always be bad.</p><p>I've not seen a lot of them, but in the world of game-to-movie conversions I think that Mortal Kombat was the only half decent effort; and even that still made for eye watering viewing throughout most of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There are many better games to make movies from .
( Deus Ex , Thief , Zelda , Golden Axe , heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better ) .
" Dude , you 're forgetting one thing - this is Hollywood making a movie out of a game .
It matters little how good the original game was , the result will always be bad.I 've not seen a lot of them , but in the world of game-to-movie conversions I think that Mortal Kombat was the only half decent effort ; and even that still made for eye watering viewing throughout most of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "There are many better games to make movies from.
(Deus Ex, Thief, Zelda, Golden Axe, heck - even Pitfall or Pac Man would be better).
" Dude, you're forgetting one thing - this is Hollywood making a movie out of a game.
It matters little how good the original game was, the result will always be bad.I've not seen a lot of them, but in the world of game-to-movie conversions I think that Mortal Kombat was the only half decent effort; and even that still made for eye watering viewing throughout most of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563021</id>
	<title>Pretty good game based on being the Asteroid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246567500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awhile back a guy did a game from the perspective of the Asteroid, it was pretty funny, and actually pretty fun:<br>http://www.kongregate.com/games/AdamSchroeder/asteroids-revenge-iii-crash-to-survive</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awhile back a guy did a game from the perspective of the Asteroid , it was pretty funny , and actually pretty fun : http : //www.kongregate.com/games/AdamSchroeder/asteroids-revenge-iii-crash-to-survive</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awhile back a guy did a game from the perspective of the Asteroid, it was pretty funny, and actually pretty fun:http://www.kongregate.com/games/AdamSchroeder/asteroids-revenge-iii-crash-to-survive</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564779</id>
	<title>That !@#$\%^ UFO</title>
	<author>nobodyman</author>
	<datestamp>1246530960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If ever there is a lull in the action, that goddamn mini-UFO will be all over the protagonist!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If ever there is a lull in the action , that goddamn mini-UFO will be all over the protagonist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If ever there is a lull in the action, that goddamn mini-UFO will be all over the protagonist!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563237</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246568220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and you got modded "interesting" !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and you got modded " interesting " ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and you got modded "interesting" !!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561289</id>
	<title>Re:Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246562040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I thought coming up with a movie plot for Joust was going to be difficult.</p><p><a href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/today.s-random-news-item/joust-the-movie-for-real-293947.php" title="kotaku.com" rel="nofollow">http://kotaku.com/gaming/today.s-random-news-item/joust-the-movie-for-real-293947.php</a> [kotaku.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I thought coming up with a movie plot for Joust was going to be difficult.http : //kotaku.com/gaming/today.s-random-news-item/joust-the-movie-for-real-293947.php [ kotaku.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I thought coming up with a movie plot for Joust was going to be difficult.http://kotaku.com/gaming/today.s-random-news-item/joust-the-movie-for-real-293947.php [kotaku.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560427</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>ByOhTek</author>
	<datestamp>1246559400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just want to see the male protagonist walk into the womens restroom and then get quietly chided by his boss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just want to see the male protagonist walk into the womens restroom and then get quietly chided by his boss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just want to see the male protagonist walk into the womens restroom and then get quietly chided by his boss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563079</id>
	<title>Re:Top 10 Game To Movies Film (Rotten Tomatoes)</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1246567740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as how 3 of those movies on the list have sequels also on that list, I don't think these movies are bombing at the box office. Critically, yes, but they have to be making their money back if they keep making sequels to them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as how 3 of those movies on the list have sequels also on that list , I do n't think these movies are bombing at the box office .
Critically , yes , but they have to be making their money back if they keep making sequels to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as how 3 of those movies on the list have sequels also on that list, I don't think these movies are bombing at the box office.
Critically, yes, but they have to be making their money back if they keep making sequels to them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563345</id>
	<title>As SLJ would promote....</title>
	<author>Gauthic</author>
	<datestamp>1246525380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's about mutherfuckin' ASTEROIDS in mutherfuckin' SPACE!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about mutherfuckin ' ASTEROIDS in mutherfuckin ' SPACE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about mutherfuckin' ASTEROIDS in mutherfuckin' SPACE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562055</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246564740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but how could you get it to end unintelligibly, culminating in a space baby?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but how could you get it to end unintelligibly , culminating in a space baby ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but how could you get it to end unintelligibly, culminating in a space baby?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563605</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>jd2112</author>
	<datestamp>1246526220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kubrick already filmed asteroids, although his depiction in 2001: A Space Odyssey, while possibly the most scientifically accurate depiction ever shown in a motion picture, isn't the most entertaining...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kubrick already filmed asteroids , although his depiction in 2001 : A Space Odyssey , while possibly the most scientifically accurate depiction ever shown in a motion picture , is n't the most entertaining.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kubrick already filmed asteroids, although his depiction in 2001: A Space Odyssey, while possibly the most scientifically accurate depiction ever shown in a motion picture, isn't the most entertaining...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563045</id>
	<title>Re:Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>BuckaBooBob</author>
	<datestamp>1246567620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard it came down to a coin toss between Pong and Asteroids... There is too much going on in asteroids... I think they could have gone with Pong as the story line is much easier to focus on. With Asteroids you never know which angle the most danger is coming from.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard it came down to a coin toss between Pong and Asteroids... There is too much going on in asteroids... I think they could have gone with Pong as the story line is much easier to focus on .
With Asteroids you never know which angle the most danger is coming from .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard it came down to a coin toss between Pong and Asteroids... There is too much going on in asteroids... I think they could have gone with Pong as the story line is much easier to focus on.
With Asteroids you never know which angle the most danger is coming from.
   </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28572301</id>
	<title>Re:Black &amp; White goodness</title>
	<author>Tybalt\_Capulet</author>
	<datestamp>1246639560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear that they're going to use game footage instead of CGI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear that they 're going to use game footage instead of CGI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear that they're going to use game footage instead of CGI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560401</id>
	<title>What's next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246559340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coming soon to a theater near you...PONG!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coming soon to a theater near you...PONG !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coming soon to a theater near you...PONG!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563457</id>
	<title>I Wonder</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1246525740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder what the given tie-in video game will be like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what the given tie-in video game will be like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what the given tie-in video game will be like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</id>
	<title>Top 10 Game To Movies Film (Rotten Tomatoes)</title>
	<author>bhunachchicken</author>
	<datestamp>1246560540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><ol>
<li>Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (44\%)</li><li>DOA: Dead or Alive (35\%)</li><li>Resident Evil (34\%)</li><li>Silent Hill (30\%)</li><li>Mortal Kombat (24\%)</li><li>Lara Craft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life (23\%)</li><li>Resident Evil: Extinction (22\%)</li><li>Resident Evil: Apocalypse (21\%)</li><li>Doom (21\%)</li><li>Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (19\%)</li></ol><p>
You know, with odds like this the popcorn fun will come from watching how badly it bombs at box office.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Final Fantasy : The Spirits Within ( 44 \ % ) DOA : Dead or Alive ( 35 \ % ) Resident Evil ( 34 \ % ) Silent Hill ( 30 \ % ) Mortal Kombat ( 24 \ % ) Lara Craft Tomb Raider : The Cradle of Life ( 23 \ % ) Resident Evil : Extinction ( 22 \ % ) Resident Evil : Apocalypse ( 21 \ % ) Doom ( 21 \ % ) Lara Croft : Tomb Raider ( 19 \ % ) You know , with odds like this the popcorn fun will come from watching how badly it bombs at box office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (44\%)DOA: Dead or Alive (35\%)Resident Evil (34\%)Silent Hill (30\%)Mortal Kombat (24\%)Lara Craft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life (23\%)Resident Evil: Extinction (22\%)Resident Evil: Apocalypse (21\%)Doom (21\%)Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (19\%)
You know, with odds like this the popcorn fun will come from watching how badly it bombs at box office.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560765</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1246560360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once upon a time, a game could be just A Game.  It didn't need a story or characters, just an entertaining activity.  Like checkers or poker or tag.  That was Asteroids, another classic.
<br> <br>
What baffles me is that anybody paid money for the rights.... to what, exactly?  There's no plot, no characters.  Just a premise (aka "idea", which cannot be copyrighted), and a trademark: "Asteroids".  All they're getting for their money is pile of middle-aged goodwill/nostalgia attached to the name.
<br> <br>
The good news is that this movie has the potential to be far better than the new Mighty Transformin' Power Rangers film TFA is making fun of, because there's so much room to <i>add</i> a story.  The bad news is that they probably won't, or the one they add will suck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time , a game could be just A Game .
It did n't need a story or characters , just an entertaining activity .
Like checkers or poker or tag .
That was Asteroids , another classic .
What baffles me is that anybody paid money for the rights.... to what , exactly ?
There 's no plot , no characters .
Just a premise ( aka " idea " , which can not be copyrighted ) , and a trademark : " Asteroids " .
All they 're getting for their money is pile of middle-aged goodwill/nostalgia attached to the name .
The good news is that this movie has the potential to be far better than the new Mighty Transformin ' Power Rangers film TFA is making fun of , because there 's so much room to add a story .
The bad news is that they probably wo n't , or the one they add will suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time, a game could be just A Game.
It didn't need a story or characters, just an entertaining activity.
Like checkers or poker or tag.
That was Asteroids, another classic.
What baffles me is that anybody paid money for the rights.... to what, exactly?
There's no plot, no characters.
Just a premise (aka "idea", which cannot be copyrighted), and a trademark: "Asteroids".
All they're getting for their money is pile of middle-aged goodwill/nostalgia attached to the name.
The good news is that this movie has the potential to be far better than the new Mighty Transformin' Power Rangers film TFA is making fun of, because there's so much room to add a story.
The bad news is that they probably won't, or the one they add will suck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562113</id>
	<title>Re:Stanley Kubrick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246564920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot one vital ingredient: have Jack Nicholoson scream "Heeeeeeere's crazy little saucer to shoot you!" with a warbling Mahler-like score in full volume in the background.</p><p>Sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot one vital ingredient : have Jack Nicholoson scream " Heeeeeeere 's crazy little saucer to shoot you !
" with a warbling Mahler-like score in full volume in the background.Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot one vital ingredient: have Jack Nicholoson scream "Heeeeeeere's crazy little saucer to shoot you!
" with a warbling Mahler-like score in full volume in the background.Sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28574103</id>
	<title>Now where have we seen this before...</title>
	<author>Sumbius</author>
	<datestamp>1246651380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A two dimensional movie with no real plot but a huge amount of things blowing up?
An overpowered spaceship destroying everything that moves and stands on it's way for no reason?
A movie with 100\% pure action and 0\% human interaction?

Welcome to Hollywood!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A two dimensional movie with no real plot but a huge amount of things blowing up ?
An overpowered spaceship destroying everything that moves and stands on it 's way for no reason ?
A movie with 100 \ % pure action and 0 \ % human interaction ?
Welcome to Hollywood !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A two dimensional movie with no real plot but a huge amount of things blowing up?
An overpowered spaceship destroying everything that moves and stands on it's way for no reason?
A movie with 100\% pure action and 0\% human interaction?
Welcome to Hollywood!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560251</id>
	<title>Whew, at least it wasn't Uwe Boll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sarcasm on - because we all know how badly we want to make sure that the movie stays true to the plot of the source material. We need it to be authentic, with genuine pew pew pew pew noises, white noise explosions, and the fearsome vector line asteroids.  Uwe Boll would have screwed that ALL up.</p><p>Do they really need a license to make an asteroid movie? Wouldn't it pretty much look exactly like the asteroid scene from Attack of the Clones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sarcasm on - because we all know how badly we want to make sure that the movie stays true to the plot of the source material .
We need it to be authentic , with genuine pew pew pew pew noises , white noise explosions , and the fearsome vector line asteroids .
Uwe Boll would have screwed that ALL up.Do they really need a license to make an asteroid movie ?
Would n't it pretty much look exactly like the asteroid scene from Attack of the Clones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sarcasm on - because we all know how badly we want to make sure that the movie stays true to the plot of the source material.
We need it to be authentic, with genuine pew pew pew pew noises, white noise explosions, and the fearsome vector line asteroids.
Uwe Boll would have screwed that ALL up.Do they really need a license to make an asteroid movie?
Wouldn't it pretty much look exactly like the asteroid scene from Attack of the Clones?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560959</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1246561020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait a minute, this ISN'T a joke? For a second there I thought it was either April 1st or that this would somehow end up linking to an Onion story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a minute , this IS N'T a joke ?
For a second there I thought it was either April 1st or that this would somehow end up linking to an Onion story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a minute, this ISN'T a joke?
For a second there I thought it was either April 1st or that this would somehow end up linking to an Onion story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561991</id>
	<title>Re:Coming soon: Tetris, the movie!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246564440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2003/01/24/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2003/01/24/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2003/01/24/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563857</id>
	<title>Re:Instead of Asteroids</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246527240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, maybe, they could try having an original idea.  Attempts to move a story from one medium to another rarely produce anything as good as the original, let alone better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , maybe , they could try having an original idea .
Attempts to move a story from one medium to another rarely produce anything as good as the original , let alone better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, maybe, they could try having an original idea.
Attempts to move a story from one medium to another rarely produce anything as good as the original, let alone better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547</id>
	<title>I don't know what is more ludicrous</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246559820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody buying the right, or someone concern about doing "right by the 30-year-old game,".</p><p>Seriously, doing right? it's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game. Don't get me wrong, I dropped plenty of money in the machine and had a good time playing it, but please.</p><p>I wuold love to see Bay do this movie. Maybe a story about a team that's supposed to clear the way for the minug crew. ON the way some bad ass aliens decide to blow them up, and they ahve to outsmart them.</p><p>It could just eb an alien shoot em up; which can be a fun movie.</p><p>Or a bunch of earth killer asteroids are coming toward us, so several crew ahve to go up and 'clear a path'.<br>That would sell. I wouldn't see it, but many people would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody buying the right , or someone concern about doing " right by the 30-year-old game , " .Seriously , doing right ?
it 's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game .
Do n't get me wrong , I dropped plenty of money in the machine and had a good time playing it , but please.I wuold love to see Bay do this movie .
Maybe a story about a team that 's supposed to clear the way for the minug crew .
ON the way some bad ass aliens decide to blow them up , and they ahve to outsmart them.It could just eb an alien shoot em up ; which can be a fun movie.Or a bunch of earth killer asteroids are coming toward us , so several crew ahve to go up and 'clear a path'.That would sell .
I would n't see it , but many people would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody buying the right, or someone concern about doing "right by the 30-year-old game,".Seriously, doing right?
it's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game.
Don't get me wrong, I dropped plenty of money in the machine and had a good time playing it, but please.I wuold love to see Bay do this movie.
Maybe a story about a team that's supposed to clear the way for the minug crew.
ON the way some bad ass aliens decide to blow them up, and they ahve to outsmart them.It could just eb an alien shoot em up; which can be a fun movie.Or a bunch of earth killer asteroids are coming toward us, so several crew ahve to go up and 'clear a path'.That would sell.
I wouldn't see it, but many people would.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569199</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246654260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who put all these MOTHERFUCKING frogs om my MOTHERFUCKING highway?</p><p>also,</p><p>Snakes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who put all these MOTHERFUCKING frogs om my MOTHERFUCKING highway ? also,Snakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who put all these MOTHERFUCKING frogs om my MOTHERFUCKING highway?also,Snakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563833</id>
	<title>Re:Top 10 Game To Movies Film (Rotten Tomatoes)</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hollywood isn't about making good movies, it's about making movies that make money.  A game movie has a recognised brand and so gets people turning up at the cinema in the first week (when the studios get close to 100\% of the ticket price) because they recognise the name; same with sequels.  </p><p>
For the record, I enjoyed the Resident Evil series.  As long as you remember to turn your brain off before starting to watch them, they're fun.  I only played one of the games, briefly at a friend's house, and found it quite tedious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood is n't about making good movies , it 's about making movies that make money .
A game movie has a recognised brand and so gets people turning up at the cinema in the first week ( when the studios get close to 100 \ % of the ticket price ) because they recognise the name ; same with sequels .
For the record , I enjoyed the Resident Evil series .
As long as you remember to turn your brain off before starting to watch them , they 're fun .
I only played one of the games , briefly at a friend 's house , and found it quite tedious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood isn't about making good movies, it's about making movies that make money.
A game movie has a recognised brand and so gets people turning up at the cinema in the first week (when the studios get close to 100\% of the ticket price) because they recognise the name; same with sequels.
For the record, I enjoyed the Resident Evil series.
As long as you remember to turn your brain off before starting to watch them, they're fun.
I only played one of the games, briefly at a friend's house, and found it quite tedious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560971</id>
	<title>wait, what?</title>
	<author>strength\_of\_10\_men</author>
	<datestamp>1246561020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would they need to buy the rights?  Why wouldn't they be able to just make a movie about a ship shooting up asteroids?</p><p>Hell, it's been done in Star Wars already, and the Star Destroyers already vaguely look like the "Asteroids" ship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would they need to buy the rights ?
Why would n't they be able to just make a movie about a ship shooting up asteroids ? Hell , it 's been done in Star Wars already , and the Star Destroyers already vaguely look like the " Asteroids " ship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would they need to buy the rights?
Why wouldn't they be able to just make a movie about a ship shooting up asteroids?Hell, it's been done in Star Wars already, and the Star Destroyers already vaguely look like the "Asteroids" ship.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28578603</id>
	<title>Come on..</title>
	<author>teamsleep</author>
	<datestamp>1246698540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is ridiculous. If it's made(and I hope it isn't) if Michael Bay produces it, it'll be retarded.

Not gonna watch this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is ridiculous .
If it 's made ( and I hope it is n't ) if Michael Bay produces it , it 'll be retarded .
Not gon na watch this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is ridiculous.
If it's made(and I hope it isn't) if Michael Bay produces it, it'll be retarded.
Not gonna watch this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28578543</id>
	<title>Re:David Spade mode on</title>
	<author>coaxial</author>
	<datestamp>1246740780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That was a good movie idea when it was called <strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079550/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Meteor</a> [imdb.com] </strong></p></div> </blockquote><p>Fixed it for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a good movie idea when it was called Meteor [ imdb.com ] Fixed it for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a good movie idea when it was called  Meteor [imdb.com]  Fixed it for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562087</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1246564800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Minesweeper.</p><p>Solitaire.</p><p>Oooh, solitaire.  THAT's a good one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Minesweeper.Solitaire.Oooh , solitaire .
THAT 's a good one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Minesweeper.Solitaire.Oooh, solitaire.
THAT's a good one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560671</id>
	<title>Pong the Movie!</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1246560120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bruce Willis: More english! More english! Yeeeeaaaahh....<br>[Bruce leaps to safety as paddle explodes in fireball]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bruce Willis : More english !
More english !
Yeeeeaaaahh.... [ Bruce leaps to safety as paddle explodes in fireball ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bruce Willis: More english!
More english!
Yeeeeaaaahh....[Bruce leaps to safety as paddle explodes in fireball]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562229</id>
	<title>Re:creativity?</title>
	<author>jeffasselin</author>
	<datestamp>1246565280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By "coming from Hollywood" I guess you mean something that's an original script, and not an adaptation.</p><p>So after reading your post I started to think about every movie I've enjoyed lately and either they were Hollywood-produced adaptions of other works (Iron Man, TDK, LotR) or not Hollywood-produced at all (Let the right one in).</p><p>Bah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By " coming from Hollywood " I guess you mean something that 's an original script , and not an adaptation.So after reading your post I started to think about every movie I 've enjoyed lately and either they were Hollywood-produced adaptions of other works ( Iron Man , TDK , LotR ) or not Hollywood-produced at all ( Let the right one in ) .Bah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By "coming from Hollywood" I guess you mean something that's an original script, and not an adaptation.So after reading your post I started to think about every movie I've enjoyed lately and either they were Hollywood-produced adaptions of other works (Iron Man, TDK, LotR) or not Hollywood-produced at all (Let the right one in).Bah.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561473</id>
	<title>Re:I don't know what is more ludicrous</title>
	<author>Migraineman</author>
	<datestamp>1246562640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>it's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
That'd be "vector graphics," you damned whippersnapper.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game That 'd be " vector graphics , " you damned whippersnapper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's a fucking shoot the rocks line drawn game

That'd be "vector graphics," you damned whippersnapper.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560657</id>
	<title>ET?</title>
	<author>funky49</author>
	<datestamp>1246560060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as long as they don't make a movie out of that ET the Extra-Terrestrial Atari game. That one sucked!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as long as they do n't make a movie out of that ET the Extra-Terrestrial Atari game .
That one sucked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as long as they don't make a movie out of that ET the Extra-Terrestrial Atari game.
That one sucked!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564505</id>
	<title>/sigh</title>
	<author>Phu5ion</author>
	<datestamp>1246529820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stop raping my childhood!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop raping my childhood !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop raping my childhood!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569799</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, astroids?</title>
	<author>Kashgarinn</author>
	<datestamp>1246619040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't interested in the game, they're interested in the title.</p><p>What do all the comic book movies / old cartoon movies have in common?  Nostalgia factor.  People go see a movie about a subject which they are already emotionally invested in.</p><p>Universal probably already have a crappy script for a crappy summermovie which happens in space, they're just giving it the extra oomph needed to get people emotionally involved.</p><p>I just find it amusing that Universal doesn't realize that the successful movies which do this, like batman begins, Iron man actually work because the writers, director, and producers are emotionally invested in making a goddamn great movie which does the old stuff credit.  you can't do that with a game title like Asterroids.  What's next?  Tetris, the movie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't interested in the game , they 're interested in the title.What do all the comic book movies / old cartoon movies have in common ?
Nostalgia factor .
People go see a movie about a subject which they are already emotionally invested in.Universal probably already have a crappy script for a crappy summermovie which happens in space , they 're just giving it the extra oomph needed to get people emotionally involved.I just find it amusing that Universal does n't realize that the successful movies which do this , like batman begins , Iron man actually work because the writers , director , and producers are emotionally invested in making a goddamn great movie which does the old stuff credit .
you ca n't do that with a game title like Asterroids .
What 's next ?
Tetris , the movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't interested in the game, they're interested in the title.What do all the comic book movies / old cartoon movies have in common?
Nostalgia factor.
People go see a movie about a subject which they are already emotionally invested in.Universal probably already have a crappy script for a crappy summermovie which happens in space, they're just giving it the extra oomph needed to get people emotionally involved.I just find it amusing that Universal doesn't realize that the successful movies which do this, like batman begins, Iron man actually work because the writers, director, and producers are emotionally invested in making a goddamn great movie which does the old stuff credit.
you can't do that with a game title like Asterroids.
What's next?
Tetris, the movie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562681</id>
	<title>Eddie Asteroids</title>
	<author>1idman</author>
	<datestamp>1246566540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any movie would have to work hard to be funnier than Eddie Murphy as "Eddie Asteroids" with Joe Piscopo on Saturday Night Live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any movie would have to work hard to be funnier than Eddie Murphy as " Eddie Asteroids " with Joe Piscopo on Saturday Night Live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any movie would have to work hard to be funnier than Eddie Murphy as "Eddie Asteroids" with Joe Piscopo on Saturday Night Live.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560439</id>
	<title>This.  Simply.  Cannot.  Be.  Serious.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246559460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This.  Simply.  Cannot.  Be.  Serious.</p><p>turing word: cometary<br>(damn it may actually be serious.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This .
Simply. Can not .
Be. Serious.turing word : cometary ( damn it may actually be serious .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This.
Simply.  Cannot.
Be.  Serious.turing word: cometary(damn it may actually be serious.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562953</id>
	<title>Different Strokes For Different Folks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246567320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I happen to like FF: TSW, DOA: DOA, Resident Evil series and Lara Croft...</p><p>Didn't watch the others?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I happen to like FF : TSW , DOA : DOA , Resident Evil series and Lara Croft...Did n't watch the others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I happen to like FF: TSW, DOA: DOA, Resident Evil series and Lara Croft...Didn't watch the others?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560705</id>
	<title>Re:How can this be anything but lame?</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1246560240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, but you have to admit the original story was kick-ass.  As long as they stay true to that, it will be AWESOME!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , but you have to admit the original story was kick-ass .
As long as they stay true to that , it will be AWESOME !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, but you have to admit the original story was kick-ass.
As long as they stay true to that, it will be AWESOME!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564267</id>
	<title>Re:Let's make this into a game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246528740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Super Mario Bros..</p><p>oh wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Super Mario Bros..oh wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Super Mario Bros..oh wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28568371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28578543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28623867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28572301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563021
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_1621241_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564267
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569199
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560525
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563581
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28623867
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561259
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28567291
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563527
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562229
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563021
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28578543
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28572301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575887
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28565463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28575925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28561447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28564565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563605
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28569925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560669
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28570149
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_1621241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28560819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28568371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28562953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_1621241.28563829
</commentlist>
</conversation>
