<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_02_0333202</id>
	<title>NSA To Build 20-Acre Data Center In Utah</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246535820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"The Salt Lake City Tribune reports that the National Security Agency will be <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci\_12735293">building a one million square foot data center at Utah's Camp Williams</a>.  The NSA's heavily automated computerized operations have for years been based at Fort Meade, Maryland, but the agency began looking to decentralize its efforts following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 and accelerated their search after the Baltimore Sun reported that the NSA &mdash; Baltimore Gas &amp; Electric's biggest customer &mdash; had <a href="http://cndyorks.gn.apc.org/yspace/articles/nsa\_overload.htm">maxed out the local grid and could not bring online several supercomputers it needed to expand its operations</a>. The agency got a taste of the potential for trouble January 24, 2000, when an information overload, rather than a power shortage, caused the NSA's first-ever network crash, taking the agency 3 1/2 days to resume operations. The new data center in Utah will require at least 65 megawatts of power &mdash; about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City &mdash; so a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams to sustain that demand. 'They were looking at secure sites, where there could be a natural nexus between organizations and where space was available,' says Col. Scott Olson, the Utah National Guard's legislative liaison. NSA officials, who have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300th\_Military\_Intelligence\_Brigade\_(United\_States)">long-standing relationship with Utah based on the state Guard's unique linguist units</a>, approached state officials about finding land in the state on which to build an additional data center. 'The stars just kind of came into alignment. We could provide them everything they need.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " The Salt Lake City Tribune reports that the National Security Agency will be building a one million square foot data center at Utah 's Camp Williams .
The NSA 's heavily automated computerized operations have for years been based at Fort Meade , Maryland , but the agency began looking to decentralize its efforts following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 , 2001 and accelerated their search after the Baltimore Sun reported that the NSA    Baltimore Gas &amp; Electric 's biggest customer    had maxed out the local grid and could not bring online several supercomputers it needed to expand its operations .
The agency got a taste of the potential for trouble January 24 , 2000 , when an information overload , rather than a power shortage , caused the NSA 's first-ever network crash , taking the agency 3 1/2 days to resume operations .
The new data center in Utah will require at least 65 megawatts of power    about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City    so a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams to sustain that demand .
'They were looking at secure sites , where there could be a natural nexus between organizations and where space was available, ' says Col. Scott Olson , the Utah National Guard 's legislative liaison .
NSA officials , who have a long-standing relationship with Utah based on the state Guard 's unique linguist units , approached state officials about finding land in the state on which to build an additional data center .
'The stars just kind of came into alignment .
We could provide them everything they need .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "The Salt Lake City Tribune reports that the National Security Agency will be building a one million square foot data center at Utah's Camp Williams.
The NSA's heavily automated computerized operations have for years been based at Fort Meade, Maryland, but the agency began looking to decentralize its efforts following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 and accelerated their search after the Baltimore Sun reported that the NSA — Baltimore Gas &amp; Electric's biggest customer — had maxed out the local grid and could not bring online several supercomputers it needed to expand its operations.
The agency got a taste of the potential for trouble January 24, 2000, when an information overload, rather than a power shortage, caused the NSA's first-ever network crash, taking the agency 3 1/2 days to resume operations.
The new data center in Utah will require at least 65 megawatts of power — about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City — so a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams to sustain that demand.
'They were looking at secure sites, where there could be a natural nexus between organizations and where space was available,' says Col. Scott Olson, the Utah National Guard's legislative liaison.
NSA officials, who have a long-standing relationship with Utah based on the state Guard's unique linguist units, approached state officials about finding land in the state on which to build an additional data center.
'The stars just kind of came into alignment.
We could provide them everything they need.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28565279</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246533180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Finding it on a map is easy.</i></p><p><i>Getting into it surreptitiously will either be:</i></p><p><i>a) Extraordinarily difficult, or<br>b) a) + life threatening.</i></p><p>That's assuming the goal is to obtain access at all, rather than to simply destroy it or cripple its' operations.</p><p>A large semi-truck &amp; trailer under MythBusters-type remote control loaded with a massive (~65,000-pounds) diesel/fertilizer bomb detonated next to the data center might put a serious crimp in surveillance operations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finding it on a map is easy.Getting into it surreptitiously will either be : a ) Extraordinarily difficult , orb ) a ) + life threatening.That 's assuming the goal is to obtain access at all , rather than to simply destroy it or cripple its ' operations.A large semi-truck &amp; trailer under MythBusters-type remote control loaded with a massive ( ~ 65,000-pounds ) diesel/fertilizer bomb detonated next to the data center might put a serious crimp in surveillance operations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finding it on a map is easy.Getting into it surreptitiously will either be:a) Extraordinarily difficult, orb) a) + life threatening.That's assuming the goal is to obtain access at all, rather than to simply destroy it or cripple its' operations.A large semi-truck &amp; trailer under MythBusters-type remote control loaded with a massive (~65,000-pounds) diesel/fertilizer bomb detonated next to the data center might put a serious crimp in surveillance operations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556241</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1246541580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finding it on a map is easy.<br> <br>Getting into it surreptitiously will either be:<br> <br>a) Extraordinarily difficult, or<br>b) a) + life threatening.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finding it on a map is easy .
Getting into it surreptitiously will either be : a ) Extraordinarily difficult , orb ) a ) + life threatening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finding it on a map is easy.
Getting into it surreptitiously will either be: a) Extraordinarily difficult, orb) a) + life threatening.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556335</id>
	<title>In Soviet USA....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246542240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...NSA <i>is</i> your ISP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...NSA is your ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...NSA is your ISP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557043</id>
	<title>In the Metric System...</title>
	<author>superFoieGras</author>
	<datestamp>1246546560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's almost 81 000 square meters, for sane people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's almost 81 000 square meters , for sane people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's almost 81 000 square meters, for sane people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556517</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1246543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.</p></div><p>And no manpower to do anything useful with it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , now we have an American agency , operating within America , and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And no manpower to do anything useful with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And no manpower to do anything useful with it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556785</id>
	<title>Why don't...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... people build underground anymore?<br>Surely the dwarves won't mind <i>that</i> much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... people build underground anymore ? Surely the dwarves wo n't mind that much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... people build underground anymore?Surely the dwarves won't mind that much?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1246549500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ?</p> </div><p>Yes you are.  And you should read USSID 18 while you are at it and see for yourself that their are specific restrictions against listening in on domestic conversations.  You will also learn that it requires a warrant granted by the Attorney General (not the Director of the NSA, not the President, not a mythical National Security Czar, Not Your Mom).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ?
Yes you are .
And you should read USSID 18 while you are at it and see for yourself that their are specific restrictions against listening in on domestic conversations .
You will also learn that it requires a warrant granted by the Attorney General ( not the Director of the NSA , not the President , not a mythical National Security Czar , Not Your Mom ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ?
Yes you are.
And you should read USSID 18 while you are at it and see for yourself that their are specific restrictions against listening in on domestic conversations.
You will also learn that it requires a warrant granted by the Attorney General (not the Director of the NSA, not the President, not a mythical National Security Czar, Not Your Mom).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557057</id>
	<title>Everything they need?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246546620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The stars just kind of came into alignment. We could provide them everything they need."

Considering it's Utah, everything, except for caffeine, alcohol, and anything else that is pleasurable or good tasting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The stars just kind of came into alignment .
We could provide them everything they need .
" Considering it 's Utah , everything , except for caffeine , alcohol , and anything else that is pleasurable or good tasting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The stars just kind of came into alignment.
We could provide them everything they need.
"

Considering it's Utah, everything, except for caffeine, alcohol, and anything else that is pleasurable or good tasting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28567815</id>
	<title>Great, now we are a nuke target.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246550940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just when I thought I moved my family to the one place no one would bother dropping a nuke on, some clown had to decide to stick 20 acres of top-secret computers down the street. Wonderful.</p><p>No point in making an attack difficult by spreading all those important computers out among many datacenters. Let's just make it easy. It might help if we stick a big red and white bullseye on the roof. It would be big enough to see from space with the naked eye. Utahns have a history of rolling over for the government. Uncle Sam owns most of the state (over 70 percent!), has the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the world here, and generally could give a care about who they have to abuse to get what they want. Orrin Hatch is so old, I'm surprised he can still grab his ankles. Bend deep sir. You won't feel a thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just when I thought I moved my family to the one place no one would bother dropping a nuke on , some clown had to decide to stick 20 acres of top-secret computers down the street .
Wonderful.No point in making an attack difficult by spreading all those important computers out among many datacenters .
Let 's just make it easy .
It might help if we stick a big red and white bullseye on the roof .
It would be big enough to see from space with the naked eye .
Utahns have a history of rolling over for the government .
Uncle Sam owns most of the state ( over 70 percent !
) , has the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the world here , and generally could give a care about who they have to abuse to get what they want .
Orrin Hatch is so old , I 'm surprised he can still grab his ankles .
Bend deep sir .
You wo n't feel a thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just when I thought I moved my family to the one place no one would bother dropping a nuke on, some clown had to decide to stick 20 acres of top-secret computers down the street.
Wonderful.No point in making an attack difficult by spreading all those important computers out among many datacenters.
Let's just make it easy.
It might help if we stick a big red and white bullseye on the roof.
It would be big enough to see from space with the naked eye.
Utahns have a history of rolling over for the government.
Uncle Sam owns most of the state (over 70 percent!
), has the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the world here, and generally could give a care about who they have to abuse to get what they want.
Orrin Hatch is so old, I'm surprised he can still grab his ankles.
Bend deep sir.
You won't feel a thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556305</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246542000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm surprised it wasn't Joe Biden making the announcement. I hear he likes to disclose the locations of secret things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised it was n't Joe Biden making the announcement .
I hear he likes to disclose the locations of secret things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised it wasn't Joe Biden making the announcement.
I hear he likes to disclose the locations of secret things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405</id>
	<title>I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1246548060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new Mormon overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556289</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finding a 20-acre facility with satellite imaging is not hard.  Finding a building site that is goign to turn in to a 20-acre facility is pretty trivial even without satellite imaging.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finding a 20-acre facility with satellite imaging is not hard .
Finding a building site that is goign to turn in to a 20-acre facility is pretty trivial even without satellite imaging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finding a 20-acre facility with satellite imaging is not hard.
Finding a building site that is goign to turn in to a 20-acre facility is pretty trivial even without satellite imaging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558427</id>
	<title>They should try using solar and wind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246552860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to help power this not-so-secret computing farm. But they probably won't. Some coal lobby will get their dirty hands into the politics and a new coal plant will be built instead. Our government is nothing more than a corporate extension. They pander to whoever waves the most dollar bills in their face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to help power this not-so-secret computing farm .
But they probably wo n't .
Some coal lobby will get their dirty hands into the politics and a new coal plant will be built instead .
Our government is nothing more than a corporate extension .
They pander to whoever waves the most dollar bills in their face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to help power this not-so-secret computing farm.
But they probably won't.
Some coal lobby will get their dirty hands into the politics and a new coal plant will be built instead.
Our government is nothing more than a corporate extension.
They pander to whoever waves the most dollar bills in their face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556829</id>
	<title>Just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're trying to build <a href="http://www.nesfa.org/reviews/Olson/SingularitySky.html" title="nesfa.org" rel="nofollow">the Eschaton</a> [nesfa.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're trying to build the Eschaton [ nesfa.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're trying to build the Eschaton [nesfa.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558977</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing secret here</title>
	<author>n7ytd</author>
	<datestamp>1246555080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is all just a distraction from the "real secret", a 2 million square foot datacenter that they're building in lake Superior's salt mines.</i></p><p>Well, thanks a lot for blowing it!  There's one 2 million square foot datacenter gone to waste...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is all just a distraction from the " real secret " , a 2 million square foot datacenter that they 're building in lake Superior 's salt mines.Well , thanks a lot for blowing it !
There 's one 2 million square foot datacenter gone to waste.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is all just a distraction from the "real secret", a 2 million square foot datacenter that they're building in lake Superior's salt mines.Well, thanks a lot for blowing it!
There's one 2 million square foot datacenter gone to waste...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563757</id>
	<title>Re:What? No CFL's?</title>
	<author>seanvaandering</author>
	<datestamp>1246526700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have they checked that it's not grow lights?</p></div><p>Shhhhhhh! Goddammit!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have they checked that it 's not grow lights ? Shhhhhhh !
Goddammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have they checked that it's not grow lights?Shhhhhhh!
Goddammit!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564933</id>
	<title>Tracking down corruption</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246531560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit.</p></div><p>Profit eh?  So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb?  They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return.  So where's the profit?</p></div><p>You seem to be under the delusion that the US federal government <i>is</i> a business instead of being <i>run by</i> former and future business executives. If you check the stocks and executive salaries for  weapons and plane manufacturers (e.g. Boeing), infrastructure rebuilders of what was just blown up (e.g. Halliburton, KBR), and private security corporations to protect the rebuilders (e.g. Blackwater), you will find the profit.</p><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed. In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.</p></div><p>Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL hasn't shown up?  It has been what, 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point?  Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?</p></div><p>Shockingly, some projects take a long time to plan, and can be delayed by permits, NIMBY, and invasions. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan\_Pipeline" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Trans-Afghanistan pipeline</a> [wikipedia.org] is one such. If you'll check your favorite news site, you'll find the Iraqi oil is, right now, being bid on by the big oil companies. "We" do not get the oil, "we" invaded Iraq (you know, blew up roads, bridges, hotels, hospitals, apartments, homes, people, but not a single oil well) so big corporations could transport it to various countries for huge profits and life-defying pollution. And for bonus points, the Iraqi peoples' profit from the oil sale is pitifully small.</p><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example. Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!</p></div><p>Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient, or, gasp, we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail?  So what.</p></div><p>You appear to not care that some laws are dumb, so dumb that there are people in prison whom have hurt no one in any manner except for violating the dumb law 3 times. These are not dumb people, they are people like your neighbor, your cousin, yourself. "So what" you say? So what about empathy? What about changing what's wrong?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war , all for profit.Profit eh ?
So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb ?
They have to pay for those planes , pilots and bombs , and get no monetary value in return .
So where 's the profit ? You seem to be under the delusion that the US federal government is a business instead of being run by former and future business executives .
If you check the stocks and executive salaries for weapons and plane manufacturers ( e.g .
Boeing ) , infrastructure rebuilders of what was just blown up ( e.g .
Halliburton , KBR ) , and private security corporations to protect the rebuilders ( e.g .
Blackwater ) , you will find the profit.In Iraq , oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil , and did n't care how many people they killed .
In Afghanistan , oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL has n't shown up ?
It has been what , 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point ?
Also , if we invaded Iraq for the oil , then why do we not have ANY of the oil ? Shockingly , some projects take a long time to plan , and can be delayed by permits , NIMBY , and invasions .
The Trans-Afghanistan pipeline [ wikipedia.org ] is one such .
If you 'll check your favorite news site , you 'll find the Iraqi oil is , right now , being bid on by the big oil companies .
" We " do not get the oil , " we " invaded Iraq ( you know , blew up roads , bridges , hotels , hospitals , apartments , homes , people , but not a single oil well ) so big corporations could transport it to various countries for huge profits and life-defying pollution .
And for bonus points , the Iraqi peoples ' profit from the oil sale is pitifully small.The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world , over 6 times higher than in Europe , for example .
Some U.S. states , such as Oregon , spend more on prisons than on education ! Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe , or our law enforcement is more efficient , or , gasp , we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail ?
So what.You appear to not care that some laws are dumb , so dumb that there are people in prison whom have hurt no one in any manner except for violating the dumb law 3 times .
These are not dumb people , they are people like your neighbor , your cousin , yourself .
" So what " you say ?
So what about empathy ?
What about changing what 's wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit.Profit eh?
So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb?
They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return.
So where's the profit?You seem to be under the delusion that the US federal government is a business instead of being run by former and future business executives.
If you check the stocks and executive salaries for  weapons and plane manufacturers (e.g.
Boeing), infrastructure rebuilders of what was just blown up (e.g.
Halliburton, KBR), and private security corporations to protect the rebuilders (e.g.
Blackwater), you will find the profit.In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed.
In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL hasn't shown up?
It has been what, 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point?
Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?Shockingly, some projects take a long time to plan, and can be delayed by permits, NIMBY, and invasions.
The Trans-Afghanistan pipeline [wikipedia.org] is one such.
If you'll check your favorite news site, you'll find the Iraqi oil is, right now, being bid on by the big oil companies.
"We" do not get the oil, "we" invaded Iraq (you know, blew up roads, bridges, hotels, hospitals, apartments, homes, people, but not a single oil well) so big corporations could transport it to various countries for huge profits and life-defying pollution.
And for bonus points, the Iraqi peoples' profit from the oil sale is pitifully small.The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example.
Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient, or, gasp, we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail?
So what.You appear to not care that some laws are dumb, so dumb that there are people in prison whom have hurt no one in any manner except for violating the dumb law 3 times.
These are not dumb people, they are people like your neighbor, your cousin, yourself.
"So what" you say?
So what about empathy?
What about changing what's wrong?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246542660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.  You need them for decrypting foreign signals. You know, their mission and stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T 's data .
You need them for decrypting foreign signals .
You know , their mission and stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.
You need them for decrypting foreign signals.
You know, their mission and stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556531</id>
	<title>Re:Nice work, Senator Hatch.</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1246543560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. The NSA uses only the intersect. No Novell deals here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
The NSA uses only the intersect .
No Novell deals here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
The NSA uses only the intersect.
No Novell deals here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</id>
	<title>American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.<br>So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.<br>And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...<br>Wonders will never cease!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing what NSA does , this Super Data Center would be used to spy , filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.So , now we have an American agency , operating within America , and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...Wonders will never cease !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...Wonders will never cease!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556745</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>MadJeff451</author>
	<datestamp>1246544880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.</p></div><p>Nah, it's our job as avid<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers to constantly second guess our government.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose thats our job as 'informed ' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.Nah , it 's our job as avid / .
readers to constantly second guess our government .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.Nah, it's our job as avid /.
readers to constantly second guess our government.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557757</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>u-235-sentinel</author>
	<datestamp>1246549620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.<br>So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.<br>And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...<br>Wonders will never cease!</p></div><p>You are mistaken.  You are operating under the assumption that we're a nation of laws.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing what NSA does , this Super Data Center would be used to spy , filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.So , now we have an American agency , operating within America , and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...Wonders will never cease ! You are mistaken .
You are operating under the assumption that we 're a nation of laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...Wonders will never cease!You are mistaken.
You are operating under the assumption that we're a nation of laws.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558085</id>
	<title>This is a failed plan</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1246551180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Step 1) Build awesome data center ala bunker fashion that can resist all but a direct nuclear strike ensuring number crunching in any* event
Step 2*) Build seperate dedicated energy plant, to power this awesome data center and make it known to the world ensuring the bad guys will just use conventional bombs to dsetroy that location.  The data center will still be around...powerless...all systems running on 5 minute battery UPC devices.<br> <br>

See when they said 65 megawatts of power I figured they would build a small nuclear power plant DEEPER underground.  Ensuring this place can run for a very long time.  I figured wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 ) Build awesome data center ala bunker fashion that can resist all but a direct nuclear strike ensuring number crunching in any * event Step 2 * ) Build seperate dedicated energy plant , to power this awesome data center and make it known to the world ensuring the bad guys will just use conventional bombs to dsetroy that location .
The data center will still be around...powerless...all systems running on 5 minute battery UPC devices .
See when they said 65 megawatts of power I figured they would build a small nuclear power plant DEEPER underground .
Ensuring this place can run for a very long time .
I figured wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1) Build awesome data center ala bunker fashion that can resist all but a direct nuclear strike ensuring number crunching in any* event
Step 2*) Build seperate dedicated energy plant, to power this awesome data center and make it known to the world ensuring the bad guys will just use conventional bombs to dsetroy that location.
The data center will still be around...powerless...all systems running on 5 minute battery UPC devices.
See when they said 65 megawatts of power I figured they would build a small nuclear power plant DEEPER underground.
Ensuring this place can run for a very long time.
I figured wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557375</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246548000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right. Those overly-suspicious rabble rousers who started this country just should have STFU and done as they were told by their government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right .
Those overly-suspicious rabble rousers who started this country just should have STFU and done as they were told by their government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right.
Those overly-suspicious rabble rousers who started this country just should have STFU and done as they were told by their government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525</id>
	<title>The U.S. government is corrupt.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246543500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By some measures, the U.S. government is the most corrupt in the world.

<br> <br>The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world.

<br> <br>The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit. In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed. In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.

<br> <br>The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example. Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!

<br> <br>This Slashdot comment discusses some of the corruption of the U.S. government concerning financial issues: <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1283101&amp;cid=28482401" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">The Investment Banking cohorts JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are the **huge** winners.</a> [slashdot.org] That comment links to an important article in Rolling Stone magazine that discusses more about how the financial corruption of the U.S. government is operated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By some measures , the U.S. government is the most corrupt in the world .
The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world .
The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war , all for profit .
In Iraq , oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil , and did n't care how many people they killed .
In Afghanistan , oil investors want to build an oil pipeline .
The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world , over 6 times higher than in Europe , for example .
Some U.S. states , such as Oregon , spend more on prisons than on education !
This Slashdot comment discusses some of the corruption of the U.S. government concerning financial issues : The Investment Banking cohorts JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are the * * huge * * winners .
[ slashdot.org ] That comment links to an important article in Rolling Stone magazine that discusses more about how the financial corruption of the U.S. government is operated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By some measures, the U.S. government is the most corrupt in the world.
The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world.
The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit.
In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed.
In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.
The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example.
Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!
This Slashdot comment discusses some of the corruption of the U.S. government concerning financial issues: The Investment Banking cohorts JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are the **huge** winners.
[slashdot.org] That comment links to an important article in Rolling Stone magazine that discusses more about how the financial corruption of the U.S. government is operated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560099</id>
	<title>National Zoo in Front Royal, VA</title>
	<author>catherder\_finleyd</author>
	<datestamp>1246558500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In one case, the Smithsonian's National Zoo has a facility in Front Royal, Virginia:</p><p><a href="http://nationalzoo.si.edu/ConservationAndScience/CRC/FrontRoyal/default.cfm" title="si.edu">http://nationalzoo.si.edu/ConservationAndScience/CRC/FrontRoyal/default.cfm</a> [si.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In one case , the Smithsonian 's National Zoo has a facility in Front Royal , Virginia : http : //nationalzoo.si.edu/ConservationAndScience/CRC/FrontRoyal/default.cfm [ si.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In one case, the Smithsonian's National Zoo has a facility in Front Royal, Virginia:http://nationalzoo.si.edu/ConservationAndScience/CRC/FrontRoyal/default.cfm [si.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556357</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1246542360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try taking pics from public land<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) <br>
One tip dont use your own car<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try taking pics from public land : ) One tip dont use your own car : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try taking pics from public land :) 
One tip dont use your own car :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558029</id>
	<title>Re:Well that should cement Utah's status...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246550820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People always bring up this article, but you will notice its not consumption of pornography, its consumption of internet pornogrpahy. whats the difference? its illegal to sell print pornography in Utah http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/851.html So people have to get it somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People always bring up this article , but you will notice its not consumption of pornography , its consumption of internet pornogrpahy .
whats the difference ?
its illegal to sell print pornography in Utah http : //attorneygeneral.utah.gov/851.html So people have to get it somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People always bring up this article, but you will notice its not consumption of pornography, its consumption of internet pornogrpahy.
whats the difference?
its illegal to sell print pornography in Utah http://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/851.html So people have to get it somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559013</id>
	<title>Open House ?</title>
	<author>bonedog73</author>
	<datestamp>1246555200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder if they give tours..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if they give tours. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if they give tours..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557845</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1246549980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...or: Utah and Mormonism are almost synonymous. Mormons go on their "missions" from age 19 to 20 to convert more mormons. MANY of them must learn a foreign language to do it. So Utah ends up with the best linguist pool in the nation. So they get a couple NG linguist units to utilize the pool. Their "moral" lifestyle makes them more likely to get TS clearances than most Americans....and bingo. Linguists + TS clearance  = NSA ties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or : Utah and Mormonism are almost synonymous .
Mormons go on their " missions " from age 19 to 20 to convert more mormons .
MANY of them must learn a foreign language to do it .
So Utah ends up with the best linguist pool in the nation .
So they get a couple NG linguist units to utilize the pool .
Their " moral " lifestyle makes them more likely to get TS clearances than most Americans....and bingo .
Linguists + TS clearance = NSA ties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or: Utah and Mormonism are almost synonymous.
Mormons go on their "missions" from age 19 to 20 to convert more mormons.
MANY of them must learn a foreign language to do it.
So Utah ends up with the best linguist pool in the nation.
So they get a couple NG linguist units to utilize the pool.
Their "moral" lifestyle makes them more likely to get TS clearances than most Americans....and bingo.
Linguists + TS clearance  = NSA ties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556861</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the new intersect! Quick, someone shoot Chuck Bartowski!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the new intersect !
Quick , someone shoot Chuck Bartowski !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the new intersect!
Quick, someone shoot Chuck Bartowski!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556133</id>
	<title>Now its the real deal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fort Meade was always the end point for what was filtered and sucked up on a global scale by the USA and friends.<br>
The FBI, US military intelligence, UK, Australia, Canada, NZ where trusted keep tabs on US interests, internal and external.<br>
Now the NSA is turning inward. Everything that was aimed at "the bad guys" "around the world' is now aimed at you in suburbia. <br>
If the FBI wants your name, they ask your ISP.<br>
if the NSA wants your name<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... they are your ISP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fort Meade was always the end point for what was filtered and sucked up on a global scale by the USA and friends .
The FBI , US military intelligence , UK , Australia , Canada , NZ where trusted keep tabs on US interests , internal and external .
Now the NSA is turning inward .
Everything that was aimed at " the bad guys " " around the world ' is now aimed at you in suburbia .
If the FBI wants your name , they ask your ISP .
if the NSA wants your name ... they are your ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fort Meade was always the end point for what was filtered and sucked up on a global scale by the USA and friends.
The FBI, US military intelligence, UK, Australia, Canada, NZ where trusted keep tabs on US interests, internal and external.
Now the NSA is turning inward.
Everything that was aimed at "the bad guys" "around the world' is now aimed at you in suburbia.
If the FBI wants your name, they ask your ISP.
if the NSA wants your name ... they are your ISP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559125</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a new movie brewing...</title>
	<author>TheQuantumShift</author>
	<datestamp>1246555680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The funny part is that Camp Williams is located in the foothills of a small mountain range, which are conveniently near the last "Hillbilly" towns in the Salt Lake Valley. But not to fear, as soon as the housing market comes back, they'll be consumed by the great stucco sprawl-monster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The funny part is that Camp Williams is located in the foothills of a small mountain range , which are conveniently near the last " Hillbilly " towns in the Salt Lake Valley .
But not to fear , as soon as the housing market comes back , they 'll be consumed by the great stucco sprawl-monster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The funny part is that Camp Williams is located in the foothills of a small mountain range, which are conveniently near the last "Hillbilly" towns in the Salt Lake Valley.
But not to fear, as soon as the housing market comes back, they'll be consumed by the great stucco sprawl-monster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417</id>
	<title>Well that should cement Utah's status...</title>
	<author>Abroun</author>
	<datestamp>1246542720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...as the country's largest per-capita paid consumer of internet pr0n ( <a href="http://people.hbs.edu/bedelman/papers/redlightstates.pdf" title="hbs.edu" rel="nofollow">http://people.hbs.edu/bedelman/papers/redlightstates.pdf</a> [hbs.edu] )</htmltext>
<tokenext>...as the country 's largest per-capita paid consumer of internet pr0n ( http : //people.hbs.edu/bedelman/papers/redlightstates.pdf [ hbs.edu ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as the country's largest per-capita paid consumer of internet pr0n ( http://people.hbs.edu/bedelman/papers/redlightstates.pdf [hbs.edu] )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560827</id>
	<title>Zombies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246560540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the one hand Obama *says* he wants "cap and trade", i.e. we all have to pay a tax due to CO2 (bullsh**). But on the other, Big Brother and our new Emperor's surveillance computers can have a separate power station. Hmmm. Please, wake up zombies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand Obama * says * he wants " cap and trade " , i.e .
we all have to pay a tax due to CO2 ( bullsh * * ) .
But on the other , Big Brother and our new Emperor 's surveillance computers can have a separate power station .
Hmmm. Please , wake up zombies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand Obama *says* he wants "cap and trade", i.e.
we all have to pay a tax due to CO2 (bullsh**).
But on the other, Big Brother and our new Emperor's surveillance computers can have a separate power station.
Hmmm. Please, wake up zombies!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558057</id>
	<title>Hmmmm</title>
	<author>the eric conspiracy</author>
	<datestamp>1246551000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28571445</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing secret here</title>
	<author>DXLster</author>
	<datestamp>1246634640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"What's this building that I'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway?"</p></div><p>Assuming it's a one-story facility, a million sq ft means 1000 ft per side, or about 1/5 of a mile.  5 minutes is 300 seconds, so you'd have to be driving at a speed of about 3.3 feet per second, or about 2.25 MPH.</p><p>In which case, please get the hell off my freeway kthx.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What 's this building that I 'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway ?
" Assuming it 's a one-story facility , a million sq ft means 1000 ft per side , or about 1/5 of a mile .
5 minutes is 300 seconds , so you 'd have to be driving at a speed of about 3.3 feet per second , or about 2.25 MPH.In which case , please get the hell off my freeway kthx .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What's this building that I'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway?
"Assuming it's a one-story facility, a million sq ft means 1000 ft per side, or about 1/5 of a mile.
5 minutes is 300 seconds, so you'd have to be driving at a speed of about 3.3 feet per second, or about 2.25 MPH.In which case, please get the hell off my freeway kthx.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557471</id>
	<title>notice the attempt at steganography above</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246548300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>JEWEL OK HEADS DC 1000 DC EPA</p><p>obviously some sort of instructions on assembling a dc powered environmental disruptor</p><p>don't think the NSA isn't noticing this friend, they have extensive steganographic data mining techniques. we're onto you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>JEWEL OK HEADS DC 1000 DC EPAobviously some sort of instructions on assembling a dc powered environmental disruptordo n't think the NSA is n't noticing this friend , they have extensive steganographic data mining techniques .
we 're onto you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JEWEL OK HEADS DC 1000 DC EPAobviously some sort of instructions on assembling a dc powered environmental disruptordon't think the NSA isn't noticing this friend, they have extensive steganographic data mining techniques.
we're onto you</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else remember when the announcement of a government facility wasn't met with constant pessimism and assertions of ill-doing?  Me either.  I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else remember when the announcement of a government facility was n't met with constant pessimism and assertions of ill-doing ?
Me either .
I suppose thats our job as 'informed ' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else remember when the announcement of a government facility wasn't met with constant pessimism and assertions of ill-doing?
Me either.
I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211</id>
	<title>Nice work, Senator Hatch.</title>
	<author>LaminatorX</author>
	<datestamp>1246541340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do I smell some juicy contracts for Novell as well?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I smell some juicy contracts for Novell as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I smell some juicy contracts for Novell as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165</id>
	<title>What? No CFL's?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>65 megawatts of power - about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City</p></div><p>Maybe it's having to run the air conditioners all the time, but that's a lot of power to be using in a residence.</p><p>Have they checked that it's not grow lights?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>65 megawatts of power - about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake CityMaybe it 's having to run the air conditioners all the time , but that 's a lot of power to be using in a residence.Have they checked that it 's not grow lights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>65 megawatts of power - about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake CityMaybe it's having to run the air conditioners all the time, but that's a lot of power to be using in a residence.Have they checked that it's not grow lights?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560281</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing secret here</title>
	<author>Celeste R</author>
	<datestamp>1246559040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take for example Area 51.<br>It's secrets are kept secret because it's remote; its active security measures are second to that.</p><p>Then take for example the Pentagon.<br>It's secrets are kept secret because of higher quality active security measures.</p><p>Even if something is a million square feet, what goes on inside can still be a well-maintained secret.  Protecting the infrastructure may seem important, until you start thinking that what goes on <b>inside that infrastructure</b> is more important.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take for example Area 51.It 's secrets are kept secret because it 's remote ; its active security measures are second to that.Then take for example the Pentagon.It 's secrets are kept secret because of higher quality active security measures.Even if something is a million square feet , what goes on inside can still be a well-maintained secret .
Protecting the infrastructure may seem important , until you start thinking that what goes on inside that infrastructure is more important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take for example Area 51.It's secrets are kept secret because it's remote; its active security measures are second to that.Then take for example the Pentagon.It's secrets are kept secret because of higher quality active security measures.Even if something is a million square feet, what goes on inside can still be a well-maintained secret.
Protecting the infrastructure may seem important, until you start thinking that what goes on inside that infrastructure is more important.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556179</id>
	<title>Sounds like a new movie brewing...</title>
	<author>Enuratique</author>
	<datestamp>1246541100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... The Hills Have Ears</htmltext>
<tokenext>... The Hills Have Ears</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... The Hills Have Ears</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557387</id>
	<title>isn't that the site we blew up</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246548000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the opening scene of terminator salvation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the opening scene of terminator salvation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the opening scene of terminator salvation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557867</id>
	<title>Re:What? No CFL's?</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1246550100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but that's a lot of power to be using in a residence.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, it just depends on the number of residences.<br> <br>65 MW is not a lot for 100,000 homes.  Hell, it's not even a lot for 30,000 homes.<br> <br>Go check your electric hour.  How many kW are you pulling right now, even without any of the following high-wattage appliances on:<br> <br>Microwave<br>Hair dryer<br>Vacuum cleaner<br>Electric Oven<br>Electric heat</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but that 's a lot of power to be using in a residence.Well , it just depends on the number of residences .
65 MW is not a lot for 100,000 homes .
Hell , it 's not even a lot for 30,000 homes .
Go check your electric hour .
How many kW are you pulling right now , even without any of the following high-wattage appliances on : MicrowaveHair dryerVacuum cleanerElectric OvenElectric heat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but that's a lot of power to be using in a residence.Well, it just depends on the number of residences.
65 MW is not a lot for 100,000 homes.
Hell, it's not even a lot for 30,000 homes.
Go check your electric hour.
How many kW are you pulling right now, even without any of the following high-wattage appliances on: MicrowaveHair dryerVacuum cleanerElectric OvenElectric heat
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563445</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1246525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You don't just "hide" a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it.</p></div></blockquote><p>You don't "hide" a secret facility at all, in the traditional sense of out and out pretending it doesn't exist.  You simply create a COVER STORY.  Something plausible which explains why they need the power, and why you don't get to take a tour...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't just " hide " a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it.You do n't " hide " a secret facility at all , in the traditional sense of out and out pretending it does n't exist .
You simply create a COVER STORY .
Something plausible which explains why they need the power , and why you do n't get to take a tour.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't just "hide" a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it.You don't "hide" a secret facility at all, in the traditional sense of out and out pretending it doesn't exist.
You simply create a COVER STORY.
Something plausible which explains why they need the power, and why you don't get to take a tour...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559211</id>
	<title>There's plenty sources of power in Utah</title>
	<author>KJSwartz</author>
	<datestamp>1246555980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solar, Geothermal, Wind, Nuclear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... scratch Nuclear - imagine using the Great Salt Lake to cool a reactor?<br>Ehr, Isotope Decay! All they need are two wires stapled to the side of Yucca Mountain in a few years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solar , Geothermal , Wind , Nuclear ... scratch Nuclear - imagine using the Great Salt Lake to cool a reactor ? Ehr , Isotope Decay !
All they need are two wires stapled to the side of Yucca Mountain in a few years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solar, Geothermal, Wind, Nuclear ... scratch Nuclear - imagine using the Great Salt Lake to cool a reactor?Ehr, Isotope Decay!
All they need are two wires stapled to the side of Yucca Mountain in a few years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557077</id>
	<title>They should talk to google...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1246546680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would actually benefit from sitting down with the google boys, and asking them about their power generating machines using solar cells...made especially for them. This conveys they pay no electricity, or almost none, (not including the small offices)<br>for their huge data centers... but do you think the NSA cares about saving their tax payers dollars,of course not!</p><p>Too bad we can't force them to try and use the most cost efficient way of doing things, especially the military as well!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would actually benefit from sitting down with the google boys , and asking them about their power generating machines using solar cells...made especially for them .
This conveys they pay no electricity , or almost none , ( not including the small offices ) for their huge data centers... but do you think the NSA cares about saving their tax payers dollars,of course not ! Too bad we ca n't force them to try and use the most cost efficient way of doing things , especially the military as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would actually benefit from sitting down with the google boys, and asking them about their power generating machines using solar cells...made especially for them.
This conveys they pay no electricity, or almost none, (not including the small offices)for their huge data centers... but do you think the NSA cares about saving their tax payers dollars,of course not!Too bad we can't force them to try and use the most cost efficient way of doing things, especially the military as well!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557581</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1246548780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do they ever sleep?  It's hard to sleep when you think the government is out to get you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they ever sleep ?
It 's hard to sleep when you think the government is out to get you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they ever sleep?
It's hard to sleep when you think the government is out to get you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558171</id>
	<title>Re:Nice work, Senator Hatch.</title>
	<author>spikenerd</author>
	<datestamp>1246551720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This comes just weeks after Microsoft announces <a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705311095/Microsoft-to-open-office-in-Lehi.html" title="deseretnews.com">they're opening a center less than a mile from there</a> [deseretnews.com]. Coincidence? I'm not so sure that Novell is the big winner here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This comes just weeks after Microsoft announces they 're opening a center less than a mile from there [ deseretnews.com ] .
Coincidence ? I 'm not so sure that Novell is the big winner here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This comes just weeks after Microsoft announces they're opening a center less than a mile from there [deseretnews.com].
Coincidence? I'm not so sure that Novell is the big winner here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556119</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557467</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>magbottle</author>
	<datestamp>1246548300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.</p></div><p>You need them for real-time mass voice recognition, keyword search and analysis.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T 's data.You need them for real-time mass voice recognition , keyword search and analysis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.You need them for real-time mass voice recognition, keyword search and analysis.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131</id>
	<title>In fact,</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1246540560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should be decentralizing a number of federal operations. For example, the Smithsonian should be broken apart and distributed around the nation. It is a JEWEL that must be preserved. Having much of our gov. in one location is a disaster in the making. It is OK to put the HEADS of organizations in DC, but the works should be distributed. Basically, we should get to the point, where all major organizations have no more than 1000 ppl in DC. Some exception should be made such as pentagon, congress, etc, but things like Health, EPA, can and should be spread about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should be decentralizing a number of federal operations .
For example , the Smithsonian should be broken apart and distributed around the nation .
It is a JEWEL that must be preserved .
Having much of our gov .
in one location is a disaster in the making .
It is OK to put the HEADS of organizations in DC , but the works should be distributed .
Basically , we should get to the point , where all major organizations have no more than 1000 ppl in DC .
Some exception should be made such as pentagon , congress , etc , but things like Health , EPA , can and should be spread about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should be decentralizing a number of federal operations.
For example, the Smithsonian should be broken apart and distributed around the nation.
It is a JEWEL that must be preserved.
Having much of our gov.
in one location is a disaster in the making.
It is OK to put the HEADS of organizations in DC, but the works should be distributed.
Basically, we should get to the point, where all major organizations have no more than 1000 ppl in DC.
Some exception should be made such as pentagon, congress, etc, but things like Health, EPA, can and should be spread about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560067</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And rules are always followed, right?</p><p>Might want to look into the statements made by the whistleblower who first came public about the AT&amp;T connections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And rules are always followed , right ? Might want to look into the statements made by the whistleblower who first came public about the AT&amp;T connections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And rules are always followed, right?Might want to look into the statements made by the whistleblower who first came public about the AT&amp;T connections.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558783</id>
	<title>Re:I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246554240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're fairly benevolent. Just make sure to combine random fruits and vegetables with jello every once in a while and use "dang" or "fetch" instead of swearing and you should be fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're fairly benevolent .
Just make sure to combine random fruits and vegetables with jello every once in a while and use " dang " or " fetch " instead of swearing and you should be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're fairly benevolent.
Just make sure to combine random fruits and vegetables with jello every once in a while and use "dang" or "fetch" instead of swearing and you should be fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556593</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246543980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Tin Foil Hat Morons are up early today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Tin Foil Hat Morons are up early today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Tin Foil Hat Morons are up early today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28565039</id>
	<title>First link says 200-acre</title>
	<author>Calyth</author>
	<datestamp>1246531980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like NSA is constructing a much bigger site according to the Salt Lake Tribune.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like NSA is constructing a much bigger site according to the Salt Lake Tribune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like NSA is constructing a much bigger site according to the Salt Lake Tribune.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28566721</id>
	<title>Re:In fact,</title>
	<author>mattwarden</author>
	<datestamp>1246541580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You seem to have stumbled upon the wisdom of the framers when they laid out a decentralized system in the Constitution, where the centralized federal government ONLY involved itself in matters where the individual states could not (this does not include: education, energy, intrastate commerce, various construction/transportation projects, etc.).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to have stumbled upon the wisdom of the framers when they laid out a decentralized system in the Constitution , where the centralized federal government ONLY involved itself in matters where the individual states could not ( this does not include : education , energy , intrastate commerce , various construction/transportation projects , etc .
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to have stumbled upon the wisdom of the framers when they laid out a decentralized system in the Constitution, where the centralized federal government ONLY involved itself in matters where the individual states could not (this does not include: education, energy, intrastate commerce, various construction/transportation projects, etc.
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556429</id>
	<title>What ever bitch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246542780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Disinformation is the cheapest and most efficient secrecy measure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disinformation is the cheapest and most efficient secrecy measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disinformation is the cheapest and most efficient secrecy measure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558559</id>
	<title>Re:But will it run Linux?</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246553340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Naah, the NSA wants <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selinux" title="wikipedia.org">nothing to do with Linux</a> [wikipedia.org]...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naah , the NSA wants nothing to do with Linux [ wikipedia.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naah, the NSA wants nothing to do with Linux [wikipedia.org]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556003</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605</id>
	<title>Nothing secret here</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1246544100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything that's a million square feet is not going to be much of a secret.</p><p>"What's this building that I'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway?"</p><p>"Oh, that's just a, uh... big empty warehouse building."</p><p>This is all just a distraction from the "real secret", a 2 million square foot datacenter that they're building in lake Superior's salt mines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything that 's a million square feet is not going to be much of a secret .
" What 's this building that I 'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway ?
" " Oh , that 's just a , uh... big empty warehouse building .
" This is all just a distraction from the " real secret " , a 2 million square foot datacenter that they 're building in lake Superior 's salt mines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything that's a million square feet is not going to be much of a secret.
"What's this building that I'm driving past for 5 minutes on the freeway?
""Oh, that's just a, uh... big empty warehouse building.
"This is all just a distraction from the "real secret", a 2 million square foot datacenter that they're building in lake Superior's salt mines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557305</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1246547700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting that the NSA  picked Utah for these "data centers".  There's been a very interesting history of the confluence of the intelligence community, mormonism and the "wandering bishops".</p><p>I highly recommend historian Peter Levenda's excellent book on the subject (as well as other fascinating subjects), <i>Sinister Forces - A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft</i>.</p><p>But if you read it, prepare to lose some sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that the NSA picked Utah for these " data centers " .
There 's been a very interesting history of the confluence of the intelligence community , mormonism and the " wandering bishops " .I highly recommend historian Peter Levenda 's excellent book on the subject ( as well as other fascinating subjects ) , Sinister Forces - A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft.But if you read it , prepare to lose some sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that the NSA  picked Utah for these "data centers".
There's been a very interesting history of the confluence of the intelligence community, mormonism and the "wandering bishops".I highly recommend historian Peter Levenda's excellent book on the subject (as well as other fascinating subjects), Sinister Forces - A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft.But if you read it, prepare to lose some sleep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557003</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1246546320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Announcing that they have a backup data center for all our phone calls and emails is their way of saying "Sure, we're totalitarians--but at least we're COMPETENT totalitarians."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Announcing that they have a backup data center for all our phone calls and emails is their way of saying " Sure , we 're totalitarians--but at least we 're COMPETENT totalitarians .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Announcing that they have a backup data center for all our phone calls and emails is their way of saying "Sure, we're totalitarians--but at least we're COMPETENT totalitarians.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28567895</id>
	<title>every home in Salt Lake City uses 65 megawatts?!?</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1246551720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wow - talk about charismatic! those Mormons are on to something...</htmltext>
<tokenext>wow - talk about charismatic !
those Mormons are on to something.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow - talk about charismatic!
those Mormons are on to something...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556645</id>
	<title>Re:Sixty five megawatts</title>
	<author>riyley</author>
	<datestamp>1246544280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City </i> </p><p>Those must be some big houses. I wonder how much they all use in total!</p></div><p>I'm sure they mean every home in Salt Lake City uses a combined 65Mw (per month?), as opposed to every individual home uses 65Mw.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City Those must be some big houses .
I wonder how much they all use in total ! I 'm sure they mean every home in Salt Lake City uses a combined 65Mw ( per month ?
) , as opposed to every individual home uses 65Mw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City  Those must be some big houses.
I wonder how much they all use in total!I'm sure they mean every home in Salt Lake City uses a combined 65Mw (per month?
), as opposed to every individual home uses 65Mw.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556041</id>
	<title>Well, now you know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, now you know where your can find those emails you accidentally deleted or forgot to backup. Safely in the hands of god, err, the NSA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , now you know where your can find those emails you accidentally deleted or forgot to backup .
Safely in the hands of god , err , the NSA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, now you know where your can find those emails you accidentally deleted or forgot to backup.
Safely in the hands of god, err, the NSA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>thedonger</author>
	<datestamp>1246544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, without a security clearance and need-to-know you will never know what the NSA does. And then forget what MSNBC has convinced you is true about the agency; there are very strict rules as to how any "signals" involving US citizens are handled. There is more foreign collection than you could possibly imagine, and that is where they expend most of their power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , without a security clearance and need-to-know you will never know what the NSA does .
And then forget what MSNBC has convinced you is true about the agency ; there are very strict rules as to how any " signals " involving US citizens are handled .
There is more foreign collection than you could possibly imagine , and that is where they expend most of their power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, without a security clearance and need-to-know you will never know what the NSA does.
And then forget what MSNBC has convinced you is true about the agency; there are very strict rules as to how any "signals" involving US citizens are handled.
There is more foreign collection than you could possibly imagine, and that is where they expend most of their power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557385</id>
	<title>Re:The U.S. government is corrupt.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246548000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when does "Rolling Stone" magazine publish IMPORTANT articles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when does " Rolling Stone " magazine publish IMPORTANT articles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when does "Rolling Stone" magazine publish IMPORTANT articles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556125</id>
	<title>The Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>200 acres? 65 megawatts? Ah ha! So that's how many computers you have to join together to make Vista not run slowly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>200 acres ?
65 megawatts ?
Ah ha !
So that 's how many computers you have to join together to make Vista not run slowly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>200 acres?
65 megawatts?
Ah ha!
So that's how many computers you have to join together to make Vista not run slowly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560501</id>
	<title>Re:Move over Blackwater, THIS is security.</title>
	<author>Celeste R</author>
	<datestamp>1246559700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The parent post ignores the fact that there's a significant amount of red tape involved in any military action.</p><p>Just because there's a billeting office that controls this aspect of security doesn't reflect the fact that there's also a security screening involved.  Furthermore, when there's not a well-documented good reason (i.e. more paperwork), why should they let you in at all?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The parent post ignores the fact that there 's a significant amount of red tape involved in any military action.Just because there 's a billeting office that controls this aspect of security does n't reflect the fact that there 's also a security screening involved .
Furthermore , when there 's not a well-documented good reason ( i.e .
more paperwork ) , why should they let you in at all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The parent post ignores the fact that there's a significant amount of red tape involved in any military action.Just because there's a billeting office that controls this aspect of security doesn't reflect the fact that there's also a security screening involved.
Furthermore, when there's not a well-documented good reason (i.e.
more paperwork), why should they let you in at all?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556203</id>
	<title>Climate change? For others only.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246541280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, one giant 20 acre heater is just what the Earth needs at this time. And the US goverment is trying to give India lectures on climate change!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , one giant 20 acre heater is just what the Earth needs at this time .
And the US goverment is trying to give India lectures on climate change !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, one giant 20 acre heater is just what the Earth needs at this time.
And the US goverment is trying to give India lectures on climate change!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558827</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>haifastudent</author>
	<datestamp>1246554480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.
So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.
And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...
Wonders will never cease!</p></div><p>Making up your own hypothetical situation and then comparing a non-existant entity to that situation is not a way to make a body look bad. It only makes you look childish.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing what NSA does , this Super Data Center would be used to spy , filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T .
So , now we have an American agency , operating within America , and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law .
And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country.. . Wonders will never cease ! Making up your own hypothetical situation and then comparing a non-existant entity to that situation is not a way to make a body look bad .
It only makes you look childish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.
So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.
And we have the galls to say USSR was a spy country...
Wonders will never cease!Making up your own hypothetical situation and then comparing a non-existant entity to that situation is not a way to make a body look bad.
It only makes you look childish.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556381</id>
	<title>hmm.</title>
	<author>strack</author>
	<datestamp>1246542540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>they could use that big temple in salt lake city. its already used for repression and evil, so itd be ideal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they could use that big temple in salt lake city .
its already used for repression and evil , so itd be ideal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they could use that big temple in salt lake city.
its already used for repression and evil, so itd be ideal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105</id>
	<title>What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wondered, what NSA does with all that firepower  if not listening to citizen conversations ?  Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ? Do serious spies talk over a phone about their stuff so NSA can kick their ass ?  I thought serious spy business mostly happens in good old fashion way - guy take few papers/copies, hands over the intermediate, they travel to where ever they want to go or encrypt and send electronically. What do we need NSA for ? What do we need CIA for, if all the money we poured in didnt stop bunch of nut jobs from blowing buildings ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wondered , what NSA does with all that firepower if not listening to citizen conversations ?
Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ?
Do serious spies talk over a phone about their stuff so NSA can kick their ass ?
I thought serious spy business mostly happens in good old fashion way - guy take few papers/copies , hands over the intermediate , they travel to where ever they want to go or encrypt and send electronically .
What do we need NSA for ?
What do we need CIA for , if all the money we poured in didnt stop bunch of nut jobs from blowing buildings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wondered, what NSA does with all that firepower  if not listening to citizen conversations ?
Are we supposed to believe they do not monitor and listen in any domestic conversations ?
Do serious spies talk over a phone about their stuff so NSA can kick their ass ?
I thought serious spy business mostly happens in good old fashion way - guy take few papers/copies, hands over the intermediate, they travel to where ever they want to go or encrypt and send electronically.
What do we need NSA for ?
What do we need CIA for, if all the money we poured in didnt stop bunch of nut jobs from blowing buildings ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28562977</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246567380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if my mom is the Attorney General?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if my mom is the Attorney General ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if my mom is the Attorney General?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557313</id>
	<title>First ever?   LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246547700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"first-ever network crash".  The author obviously has never worked at the Agency.  Posting anonymously for what should be obvious reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" first-ever network crash " .
The author obviously has never worked at the Agency .
Posting anonymously for what should be obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"first-ever network crash".
The author obviously has never worked at the Agency.
Posting anonymously for what should be obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28566145</id>
	<title>Story should have read:</title>
	<author>atramentum</author>
	<datestamp>1246538160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>NSA to build Skynet, Terminators expected to rise up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>NSA to build Skynet , Terminators expected to rise up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NSA to build Skynet, Terminators expected to rise up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564531</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Teancum</author>
	<datestamp>1246529940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Camp Williams is a big place, and it should be noted that about two-thirds of Utah is federal property of one sort or another (including quite a bit of land around Camp Williams).  Quite a bit of the nearby property is even formally controlled by the Department of Defense, most of which is usually considered to be otherwise wilderness.</p><p>What I'm trying to say here is that by saying something is located at Utah's Camp Williams is about like saying a secret military installation is located in New England.  It covers about the same amount of territory with other similar "restricted" territory that you must get military permission to enter.  The 9/11 hijackers would have run out of fuel over the Great Salt Lake trying to find the place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Camp Williams is a big place , and it should be noted that about two-thirds of Utah is federal property of one sort or another ( including quite a bit of land around Camp Williams ) .
Quite a bit of the nearby property is even formally controlled by the Department of Defense , most of which is usually considered to be otherwise wilderness.What I 'm trying to say here is that by saying something is located at Utah 's Camp Williams is about like saying a secret military installation is located in New England .
It covers about the same amount of territory with other similar " restricted " territory that you must get military permission to enter .
The 9/11 hijackers would have run out of fuel over the Great Salt Lake trying to find the place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Camp Williams is a big place, and it should be noted that about two-thirds of Utah is federal property of one sort or another (including quite a bit of land around Camp Williams).
Quite a bit of the nearby property is even formally controlled by the Department of Defense, most of which is usually considered to be otherwise wilderness.What I'm trying to say here is that by saying something is located at Utah's Camp Williams is about like saying a secret military installation is located in New England.
It covers about the same amount of territory with other similar "restricted" territory that you must get military permission to enter.
The 9/11 hijackers would have run out of fuel over the Great Salt Lake trying to find the place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559329</id>
	<title>Re:I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</title>
	<author>bonedog73</author>
	<datestamp>1246556340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew the Mormons were behind the NSA! Oh Snap!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew the Mormons were behind the NSA !
Oh Snap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew the Mormons were behind the NSA!
Oh Snap!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556027</id>
	<title>Just picture this data center...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then picture Obama standing there posed like the Colossus of Rhodes as his nuts explore all over your adoring face, and he has a good laugh at your expense while you sing psalms to him and offer him burnt offerings. I've never heard of a ruler who has such contempt for their subjects since Marie Antoinette, while at the same time maintaining such loyalty. It's amazing, really. I wonder how long it will take for the last Obamabot to finally admit that change = more of the same with a double portion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then picture Obama standing there posed like the Colossus of Rhodes as his nuts explore all over your adoring face , and he has a good laugh at your expense while you sing psalms to him and offer him burnt offerings .
I 've never heard of a ruler who has such contempt for their subjects since Marie Antoinette , while at the same time maintaining such loyalty .
It 's amazing , really .
I wonder how long it will take for the last Obamabot to finally admit that change = more of the same with a double portion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then picture Obama standing there posed like the Colossus of Rhodes as his nuts explore all over your adoring face, and he has a good laugh at your expense while you sing psalms to him and offer him burnt offerings.
I've never heard of a ruler who has such contempt for their subjects since Marie Antoinette, while at the same time maintaining such loyalty.
It's amazing, really.
I wonder how long it will take for the last Obamabot to finally admit that change = more of the same with a double portion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557607</id>
	<title>Re:Sixty five megawatts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246548960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry mate, but:</p><p>WHOOOOOSH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry mate , but : WHOOOOOSH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry mate, but:WHOOOOOSH!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557357</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1246547880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sweeping statements are not necessarily correct statements.  For example, this statement is completely incorrect:  "without oversight of law."  United States Signals Intelligence Directive 18 (Intelligence Oversight), clearly outlines the limitations against collecting against and maintaining recordings of US Persons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweeping statements are not necessarily correct statements .
For example , this statement is completely incorrect : " without oversight of law .
" United States Signals Intelligence Directive 18 ( Intelligence Oversight ) , clearly outlines the limitations against collecting against and maintaining recordings of US Persons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweeping statements are not necessarily correct statements.
For example, this statement is completely incorrect:  "without oversight of law.
"  United States Signals Intelligence Directive 18 (Intelligence Oversight), clearly outlines the limitations against collecting against and maintaining recordings of US Persons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558043</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1246550880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.
So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.</p></div><p>Turn this to your advantage.  Whenever you're away from home, call the NSA and ask if you have any messages.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing what NSA does , this Super Data Center would be used to spy , filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T .
So , now we have an American agency , operating within America , and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.Turn this to your advantage .
Whenever you 're away from home , call the NSA and ask if you have any messages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing what NSA does, this Super Data Center would be used to spy, filter and record all the calls redirected it to by AT&amp;T.
So, now we have an American agency, operating within America, and recording American telephone conversations without oversight of law.Turn this to your advantage.
Whenever you're away from home, call the NSA and ask if you have any messages.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557589</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246548840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there is one thing I'm certain of, it's that I DON'T KNOW what the NSA's mission EXACTLY is!!!!!</p><p>And NEITHER DO YOU!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is one thing I 'm certain of , it 's that I DO N'T KNOW what the NSA 's mission EXACTLY is ! ! ! !
! And NEITHER DO YOU ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is one thing I'm certain of, it's that I DON'T KNOW what the NSA's mission EXACTLY is!!!!
!And NEITHER DO YOU!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559305</id>
	<title>Re:Well that should cement Utah's status...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246556280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>paid</i> consumer of internet pr0n</p><p>Paying for pr0n?  I just connect a "ethernet cable" to a "modem" and it just kind of falls out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>paid consumer of internet pr0nPaying for pr0n ?
I just connect a " ethernet cable " to a " modem " and it just kind of falls out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>paid consumer of internet pr0nPaying for pr0n?
I just connect a "ethernet cable" to a "modem" and it just kind of falls out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558631</id>
	<title>What clearances will the NSA require?</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1246553700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am guessing it will be mainly top-secret. But DoD/TS or SSBI/TC or TS/SCI, or something else? I wonder if they will use anything less that TS? Like DoD/Secret?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am guessing it will be mainly top-secret .
But DoD/TS or SSBI/TC or TS/SCI , or something else ?
I wonder if they will use anything less that TS ?
Like DoD/Secret ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am guessing it will be mainly top-secret.
But DoD/TS or SSBI/TC or TS/SCI, or something else?
I wonder if they will use anything less that TS?
Like DoD/Secret?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556003</id>
	<title>But will it run Linux?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's all I want to know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all I want to know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all I want to know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565</id>
	<title>Re:The U.S. government is corrupt.</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1246548720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world.</p></div><p>Care to cite that?


 </p><p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit.</p></div><p>Profit eh?  So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb?  They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return.  So where's the profit?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed. In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.</p></div><p>Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL hasn't shown up?  It has been what, 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point?  Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example. Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!</p></div><p>Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient, or, gasp, we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail?  So what.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world.Care to cite that ?
The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war , all for profit.Profit eh ?
So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb ?
They have to pay for those planes , pilots and bombs , and get no monetary value in return .
So where 's the profit ? In Iraq , oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil , and did n't care how many people they killed .
In Afghanistan , oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL has n't shown up ?
It has been what , 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point ?
Also , if we invaded Iraq for the oil , then why do we not have ANY of the oil ? The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world , over 6 times higher than in Europe , for example .
Some U.S. states , such as Oregon , spend more on prisons than on education ! Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe , or our law enforcement is more efficient , or , gasp , we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail ?
So what .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The U.S. government spends more on surveillance of its citizens than any country in the entire history of the world.Care to cite that?
The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the end of the 2nd world war, all for profit.Profit eh?
So how much money does the US government earn every time a B1 Bomber drops another bomb?
They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return.
So where's the profit?In Iraq, oil and weapons investors like Bush and Cheney wanted control over the oil, and didn't care how many people they killed.
In Afghanistan, oil investors want to build an oil pipeline.Care to explain why this mythical oil pipeline STILL hasn't shown up?
It has been what, 8 years now since Moore made up this talking point?
Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?The U.S. government has a higher percentage of its people in prison than any country ever in the history of the world, over 6 times higher than in Europe, for example.
Some U.S. states, such as Oregon, spend more on prisons than on education!Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient, or, gasp, we have a bunch of dumb laws that put dumb people in jail?
So what.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557827</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1246549920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well said.  There are enough open source sources out their for even the most intellectually challenged to figure out what the NSA does.  These fools on here who think they know what the NSA does are simply that--fools.

<p>Here's a declassified version of the restrictions against collecting on US Persons, for example.  This alone debunks 99\% of the stupid comments that always pop-up in any NSA related thread.  <a href="http://cryptome.org/nsa-ussid18.htm" title="cryptome.org">http://cryptome.org/nsa-ussid18.htm</a> [cryptome.org] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said .
There are enough open source sources out their for even the most intellectually challenged to figure out what the NSA does .
These fools on here who think they know what the NSA does are simply that--fools .
Here 's a declassified version of the restrictions against collecting on US Persons , for example .
This alone debunks 99 \ % of the stupid comments that always pop-up in any NSA related thread .
http : //cryptome.org/nsa-ussid18.htm [ cryptome.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said.
There are enough open source sources out their for even the most intellectually challenged to figure out what the NSA does.
These fools on here who think they know what the NSA does are simply that--fools.
Here's a declassified version of the restrictions against collecting on US Persons, for example.
This alone debunks 99\% of the stupid comments that always pop-up in any NSA related thread.
http://cryptome.org/nsa-ussid18.htm [cryptome.org] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556669</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246544400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The NSA does signal intelligence.  This includes functions such as breaking codes through cryptoanalysis, etc. The CIA is in the 'old-fashioned' spy business.  Neither are directly responsible for "stopping nut jobs from blowing up buildings" on home soil:  that job, at the time, would have fallen to the FBI, the Federal Marshals, the ATF, and state and local law enforcement.  Currently, the agency tasked with this job is the Department of Homeland Security.</p><p>Besides, we know from media accounts that the CIA and NSA both informed the White House and the FBI about Al Qaeda's plans, but they were roundly ignored.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The NSA does signal intelligence .
This includes functions such as breaking codes through cryptoanalysis , etc .
The CIA is in the 'old-fashioned ' spy business .
Neither are directly responsible for " stopping nut jobs from blowing up buildings " on home soil : that job , at the time , would have fallen to the FBI , the Federal Marshals , the ATF , and state and local law enforcement .
Currently , the agency tasked with this job is the Department of Homeland Security.Besides , we know from media accounts that the CIA and NSA both informed the White House and the FBI about Al Qaeda 's plans , but they were roundly ignored .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NSA does signal intelligence.
This includes functions such as breaking codes through cryptoanalysis, etc.
The CIA is in the 'old-fashioned' spy business.
Neither are directly responsible for "stopping nut jobs from blowing up buildings" on home soil:  that job, at the time, would have fallen to the FBI, the Federal Marshals, the ATF, and state and local law enforcement.
Currently, the agency tasked with this job is the Department of Homeland Security.Besides, we know from media accounts that the CIA and NSA both informed the White House and the FBI about Al Qaeda's plans, but they were roundly ignored.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28561039</id>
	<title>Re:I, for one, welcome our new Mormon overlords.</title>
	<author>cenc</author>
	<datestamp>1246561200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need the extra juice to power the free ice cream machine in the lobby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need the extra juice to power the free ice cream machine in the lobby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need the extra juice to power the free ice cream machine in the lobby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556869</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course this is assuming no one on AT&amp;T makes international calls, or no one internationally calls US AT&amp;T customers, like terrorists contacting a cell that is operating here.</p><p>This is probably a small percentage of AT&amp;T's calls... however, if they had any sense the terrorists would get those Go phones that don't require ID to purchase and activate, so yea, it's likely AT&amp;T isn't very interesting to the NSA.  But I'm also pretty sure that NSA would never underestimate the stupidity of extremists since you need to be pretty retarded to blow yourself up in the name of a religion that's been twisted to make violence OK.</p><p>Truth be told, nobody really knows what NSA does but NSA and possibly the president so anyone here is talking out of their ass because they don't work there. If they did, they won't be much longer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course this is assuming no one on AT&amp;T makes international calls , or no one internationally calls US AT&amp;T customers , like terrorists contacting a cell that is operating here.This is probably a small percentage of AT&amp;T 's calls... however , if they had any sense the terrorists would get those Go phones that do n't require ID to purchase and activate , so yea , it 's likely AT&amp;T is n't very interesting to the NSA .
But I 'm also pretty sure that NSA would never underestimate the stupidity of extremists since you need to be pretty retarded to blow yourself up in the name of a religion that 's been twisted to make violence OK.Truth be told , nobody really knows what NSA does but NSA and possibly the president so anyone here is talking out of their ass because they do n't work there .
If they did , they wo n't be much longer ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course this is assuming no one on AT&amp;T makes international calls, or no one internationally calls US AT&amp;T customers, like terrorists contacting a cell that is operating here.This is probably a small percentage of AT&amp;T's calls... however, if they had any sense the terrorists would get those Go phones that don't require ID to purchase and activate, so yea, it's likely AT&amp;T isn't very interesting to the NSA.
But I'm also pretty sure that NSA would never underestimate the stupidity of extremists since you need to be pretty retarded to blow yourself up in the name of a religion that's been twisted to make violence OK.Truth be told, nobody really knows what NSA does but NSA and possibly the president so anyone here is talking out of their ass because they don't work there.
If they did, they won't be much longer ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556059</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246540080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now imagine a beowulf cluster of these.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now imagine a beowulf cluster of these.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now imagine a beowulf cluster of these.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556343</id>
	<title>Cap and Trade</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246542240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like Cap and Trade will not apply to the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like Cap and Trade will not apply to the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like Cap and Trade will not apply to the government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556535</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>arb phd slp</author>
	<datestamp>1246543560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's kindof hard to hide the massive power transmission infrastructure, also. You don't just "hide" a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's kindof hard to hide the massive power transmission infrastructure , also .
You do n't just " hide " a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's kindof hard to hide the massive power transmission infrastructure, also.
You don't just "hide" a facility that has that much electricity coming from civilian sources going into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556845</id>
	<title>US Government Hypocrisy</title>
	<author>Rocketship Underpant</author>
	<datestamp>1246545480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The hypocrisy of the US government never ceases to amaze. Here Obama has been going about cutting back on home energy use, carbon credits, etc. And at the same time, he's going to open a new government facility that uses as much electricity as all of Salt Lake City?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The hypocrisy of the US government never ceases to amaze .
Here Obama has been going about cutting back on home energy use , carbon credits , etc .
And at the same time , he 's going to open a new government facility that uses as much electricity as all of Salt Lake City ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hypocrisy of the US government never ceases to amaze.
Here Obama has been going about cutting back on home energy use, carbon credits, etc.
And at the same time, he's going to open a new government facility that uses as much electricity as all of Salt Lake City?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1246539780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <i>secret</i> service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media?</p><p>It will be a very large data center.<br>It will be important.<br>It will be secret.<br>And it will be located at Utah's Camp Williams.</p><p>That's very amicable to other secret services. Saves them some searching.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The secret service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media ? It will be a very large data center.It will be important.It will be secret.And it will be located at Utah 's Camp Williams.That 's very amicable to other secret services .
Saves them some searching .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The secret service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media?It will be a very large data center.It will be important.It will be secret.And it will be located at Utah's Camp Williams.That's very amicable to other secret services.
Saves them some searching.
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556281</id>
	<title>Halfway there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another data center like this and we could power the flux capacitor!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another data center like this and we could power the flux capacitor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another data center like this and we could power the flux capacitor!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556711</id>
	<title>Need your attention, FreedomIndia... tia! apk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246544640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28556345" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28556345</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>Couple points in there in regards to the "history of the Windows display engine" you might not have been aware of, &amp; also, possibly more importantly, what is in my "p.s." there is a question I would like to ask you also... so, per my subject-line above? Thanks in advance for the reply!</p><p>APK</p><p>P.S.=&gt; Sorry to disturb you here, otherwise... apk</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1287729&amp;cid = 28556345 [ slashdot.org ] Couple points in there in regards to the " history of the Windows display engine " you might not have been aware of , &amp; also , possibly more importantly , what is in my " p.s .
" there is a question I would like to ask you also... so , per my subject-line above ?
Thanks in advance for the reply ! APKP.S. = &gt; Sorry to disturb you here , otherwise... apk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&amp;cid=28556345 [slashdot.org]Couple points in there in regards to the "history of the Windows display engine" you might not have been aware of, &amp; also, possibly more importantly, what is in my "p.s.
" there is a question I would like to ask you also... so, per my subject-line above?
Thanks in advance for the reply!APKP.S.=&gt; Sorry to disturb you here, otherwise... apk</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049</id>
	<title>Sixty five megawatts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246539900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City </i></p><p>Those must be some big houses. I wonder how much they all use in total!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City Those must be some big houses .
I wonder how much they all use in total !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>65 megawatts of power -- about the same amount used by every home in Salt Lake City Those must be some big houses.
I wonder how much they all use in total!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559203</id>
	<title>Re:American Money, American Land, American Calls</title>
	<author>Voyager529</author>
	<datestamp>1246555920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.  You need them for decrypting foreign signals. You know, their mission and stuff.</p></div><p>Chloe O'Brien does all that and more for Jack Bauer on a Mac and a few Dell servers in minutes. I want my tax dollars back!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T 's data .
You need them for decrypting foreign signals .
You know , their mission and stuff.Chloe O'Brien does all that and more for Jack Bauer on a Mac and a few Dell servers in minutes .
I want my tax dollars back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need supercomputers for handling AT&amp;T's data.
You need them for decrypting foreign signals.
You know, their mission and stuff.Chloe O'Brien does all that and more for Jack Bauer on a Mac and a few Dell servers in minutes.
I want my tax dollars back!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556697</id>
	<title>Re:Sixty five megawatts</title>
	<author>worip</author>
	<datestamp>1246544580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aahhh, but these houses are AMERICAN houses, probably biggest and the most environmentally non-friendly houses on the planet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aahhh , but these houses are AMERICAN houses , probably biggest and the most environmentally non-friendly houses on the planet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aahhh, but these houses are AMERICAN houses, probably biggest and the most environmentally non-friendly houses on the planet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559217</id>
	<title>Re:The U.S. government is corrupt.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246555980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Care to cite that?</i> </p><p>Why should he?  There are some things that are questionable and legitimately require a source.  Other things are patently self-evident and anyone asking for a citation is just wasting everyone's time.  This is in the latter category.</p><p>Why don't you waste YOUR time and try to prove him wrong?  </p><p> <i>So where's the profit?</i> </p><p>There are different types of "profit" and rarely does the average American figure into the equation.  If you are questioning the monetary kind, look no further than the defense companies.</p><p> <i>Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?</i>

</p><p>Because the Iraqis told the US and Britain to take the sweetheart oil contracts for their companies and piss off.  It's well documented and should be no surprise.  Everything in Iraq was premised on them rolling over and/or devolving into corruption.  They didn't roll over but given the current state of affairs we do get some oil from the corrupt.</p><p> <i>Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient,</i> </p><p>Or maybe decisions were made that since we decided to export our entire manufacturing base to China and would never be able to provide livable wage jobs for a significant percentage of the population it was better to pay part of the unemployable to guard the rest than to have any of them agitating for their share of the American dream.  Better to stigmatize and lock them up in their prime years, for whatever reason, than have them rocking everyone else's boat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Care to cite that ?
Why should he ?
There are some things that are questionable and legitimately require a source .
Other things are patently self-evident and anyone asking for a citation is just wasting everyone 's time .
This is in the latter category.Why do n't you waste YOUR time and try to prove him wrong ?
So where 's the profit ?
There are different types of " profit " and rarely does the average American figure into the equation .
If you are questioning the monetary kind , look no further than the defense companies .
Also , if we invaded Iraq for the oil , then why do we not have ANY of the oil ?
Because the Iraqis told the US and Britain to take the sweetheart oil contracts for their companies and piss off .
It 's well documented and should be no surprise .
Everything in Iraq was premised on them rolling over and/or devolving into corruption .
They did n't roll over but given the current state of affairs we do get some oil from the corrupt .
Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe , or our law enforcement is more efficient , Or maybe decisions were made that since we decided to export our entire manufacturing base to China and would never be able to provide livable wage jobs for a significant percentage of the population it was better to pay part of the unemployable to guard the rest than to have any of them agitating for their share of the American dream .
Better to stigmatize and lock them up in their prime years , for whatever reason , than have them rocking everyone else 's boat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Care to cite that?
Why should he?
There are some things that are questionable and legitimately require a source.
Other things are patently self-evident and anyone asking for a citation is just wasting everyone's time.
This is in the latter category.Why don't you waste YOUR time and try to prove him wrong?
So where's the profit?
There are different types of "profit" and rarely does the average American figure into the equation.
If you are questioning the monetary kind, look no further than the defense companies.
Also, if we invaded Iraq for the oil, then why do we not have ANY of the oil?
Because the Iraqis told the US and Britain to take the sweetheart oil contracts for their companies and piss off.
It's well documented and should be no surprise.
Everything in Iraq was premised on them rolling over and/or devolving into corruption.
They didn't roll over but given the current state of affairs we do get some oil from the corrupt.
Perhaps there is a higher percentage of criminals in the US than in Europe, or our law enforcement is more efficient, Or maybe decisions were made that since we decided to export our entire manufacturing base to China and would never be able to provide livable wage jobs for a significant percentage of the population it was better to pay part of the unemployable to guard the rest than to have any of them agitating for their share of the American dream.
Better to stigmatize and lock them up in their prime years, for whatever reason, than have them rocking everyone else's boat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557081</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1246546740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean back when the Cold War and other efforts kept the wool over your eyes?</p><p><em>Tom Lehrer said, when he quit doing comedy in 1973, that "political satire became redundant the day Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize.</em></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean back when the Cold War and other efforts kept the wool over your eyes ? Tom Lehrer said , when he quit doing comedy in 1973 , that " political satire became redundant the day Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean back when the Cold War and other efforts kept the wool over your eyes?Tom Lehrer said, when he quit doing comedy in 1973, that "political satire became redundant the day Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560173</id>
	<title>Re:What does NSA do ? Why do we need CIA ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246558740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's not happening.</p><p>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html</p><p>Delusional to the last.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because it 's illegal does n't mean it 's not happening.http : //www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.htmlDelusional to the last .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's not happening.http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.htmlDelusional to the last.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556197</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246541220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who said that it really will there? Just because you read it does not make it so. Why was carnivore used when it should be obvious to all that we had MUCH more invasive procedures in place? Heck, the argument for Callea was that we did not have spying capability. Yet, all of our American spying capability was set up under Clinton (and before).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said that it really will there ?
Just because you read it does not make it so .
Why was carnivore used when it should be obvious to all that we had MUCH more invasive procedures in place ?
Heck , the argument for Callea was that we did not have spying capability .
Yet , all of our American spying capability was set up under Clinton ( and before ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said that it really will there?
Just because you read it does not make it so.
Why was carnivore used when it should be obvious to all that we had MUCH more invasive procedures in place?
Heck, the argument for Callea was that we did not have spying capability.
Yet, all of our American spying capability was set up under Clinton (and before).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556641</id>
	<title>Move over Blackwater, THIS is security.</title>
	<author>hoarier</author>
	<datestamp>1246544280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> We read above: <em>. . . a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams. "They were looking at secure sites [...]" says Col. Scott Olson....</em> </p><p>To whom (in Tora Bora and elsewhere) it may concern: <a href="http://www.ut.ngb.army.mil/campwilliams/faq.html" title="army.mil" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [army.mil] is the Camp Williams FAQ, which imparts such nuggets of High Security as:</p><p> <em>Q. Where do I call to make arrangements to pick up key's [sic] for buildings and class rooms.</em> </p><p> <em>A. Call the billeting office 878-5410. All buildings on post are controlled by the Billeting office.. Call ahead to make sure they are open. Their hours are not the same every day.</em> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We read above : .
. .
a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams .
" They were looking at secure sites [ ... ] " says Col. Scott Olson.... To whom ( in Tora Bora and elsewhere ) it may concern : Here [ army.mil ] is the Camp Williams FAQ , which imparts such nuggets of High Security as : Q. Where do I call to make arrangements to pick up key 's [ sic ] for buildings and class rooms .
A. Call the billeting office 878-5410 .
All buildings on post are controlled by the Billeting office.. Call ahead to make sure they are open .
Their hours are not the same every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We read above: .
. .
a separate power substation will have to be built at Camp Williams.
"They were looking at secure sites [...]" says Col. Scott Olson.... To whom (in Tora Bora and elsewhere) it may concern: Here [army.mil] is the Camp Williams FAQ, which imparts such nuggets of High Security as: Q. Where do I call to make arrangements to pick up key's [sic] for buildings and class rooms.
A. Call the billeting office 878-5410.
All buildings on post are controlled by the Billeting office.. Call ahead to make sure they are open.
Their hours are not the same every day. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556787</id>
	<title>Re:Sixty five megawatts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246545120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just wish your electricity was as cheap as hours so you can leave your lights on 24x7 like Al Gore does, JACKASS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just wish your electricity was as cheap as hours so you can leave your lights on 24x7 like Al Gore does , JACKASS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just wish your electricity was as cheap as hours so you can leave your lights on 24x7 like Al Gore does, JACKASS!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556617</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1246544160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.</i></p><p>Yes, it is because 99 times out of 100 there is some sort of bullshit going on that will never see the light of day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose thats our job as 'informed ' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.Yes , it is because 99 times out of 100 there is some sort of bullshit going on that will never see the light of day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose thats our job as 'informed' citizens though.. to constantly second guess our government.Yes, it is because 99 times out of 100 there is some sort of bullshit going on that will never see the light of day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558583</id>
	<title>Re:The U.S. government is corrupt.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246553580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return. So where's the profit?"</i></p><p>Where is the profit? Just ask the companies the government purchase the weapons and planes from.  I'm sure they have an answer.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They have to pay for those planes , pilots and bombs , and get no monetary value in return .
So where 's the profit ?
" Where is the profit ?
Just ask the companies the government purchase the weapons and planes from .
I 'm sure they have an answer .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They have to pay for those planes, pilots and bombs, and get no monetary value in return.
So where's the profit?
"Where is the profit?
Just ask the companies the government purchase the weapons and planes from.
I'm sure they have an answer.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556277</id>
	<title>That should cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246541820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All this talk about wasted money is making me hungry. Are we in the position to make such decisions in these times? Shouldn't we wait a few months / years before investing anything (even planning) in this stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All this talk about wasted money is making me hungry .
Are we in the position to make such decisions in these times ?
Should n't we wait a few months / years before investing anything ( even planning ) in this stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this talk about wasted money is making me hungry.
Are we in the position to make such decisions in these times?
Shouldn't we wait a few months / years before investing anything (even planning) in this stuff?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556589</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>patro</author>
	<datestamp>1246543980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The <i>secret</i> service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media?</p></div><p>It can be a ploy to divert public attention from other more important clandestine projects to this decoy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The secret service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media ? It can be a ploy to divert public attention from other more important clandestine projects to this decoy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The secret service builds a datacenter and announces that in mainstream media?It can be a ploy to divert public attention from other more important clandestine projects to this decoy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556565</id>
	<title>"Decentralized" You keep using this word...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246543800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Decentralized"<br>You keep using this word; I do not think it means what you think it means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Decentralized " You keep using this word ; I do not think it means what you think it means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Decentralized"You keep using this word; I do not think it means what you think it means.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28569069</id>
	<title>whaaaaa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246652460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
The American taxpayer is paying how much???? for what????   Holy crap...

1984 people - read it - or at least watch a movie of it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The American taxpayer is paying how much ? ? ? ?
for what ? ? ? ?
Holy crap.. . 1984 people - read it - or at least watch a movie of it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The American taxpayer is paying how much????
for what????
Holy crap...

1984 people - read it - or at least watch a movie of it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28571445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28561039
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28566721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28562977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28565279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_02_0333202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557305
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556593
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556525
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557565
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558583
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564933
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556409
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557467
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556845
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28571445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558783
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28561039
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559125
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556645
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556277
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560067
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28562977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28564531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556241
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28565279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556289
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556535
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558057
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28559305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28563757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557867
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28566721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28560099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28557471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_02_0333202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28556003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_02_0333202.28558559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
