<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_30_1650208</id>
	<title>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246382040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Kudos to NASA and the Japanese trade ministry for <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8126197.stm">mapping 99\% of the Earth's surface</a>, surpassing their <a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15838">previous effort</a>, with which the new data will be amalgamated. Apparently, the data will be free to download and use."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Kudos to NASA and the Japanese trade ministry for mapping 99 \ % of the Earth 's surface , surpassing their previous effort , with which the new data will be amalgamated .
Apparently , the data will be free to download and use .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Kudos to NASA and the Japanese trade ministry for mapping 99\% of the Earth's surface, surpassing their previous effort, with which the new data will be amalgamated.
Apparently, the data will be free to download and use.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531717</id>
	<title>Oh my gosh!</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1246387380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I pulled an all-nighter, and I saw the dual headlines - carnivorous bugs, NASA and 99\% of the earth, and I was nearly ready to head for the hills thinking that some astronauts had just made a terrible, terrible mistake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I pulled an all-nighter , and I saw the dual headlines - carnivorous bugs , NASA and 99 \ % of the earth , and I was nearly ready to head for the hills thinking that some astronauts had just made a terrible , terrible mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I pulled an all-nighter, and I saw the dual headlines - carnivorous bugs, NASA and 99\% of the earth, and I was nearly ready to head for the hills thinking that some astronauts had just made a terrible, terrible mistake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533301</id>
	<title>Re:Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Comple</title>
	<author>bickle</author>
	<datestamp>1246393320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wake me when the Complete Topographical Map is mostly complete. THEN I'll be impressed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me when the Complete Topographical Map is mostly complete .
THEN I 'll be impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me when the Complete Topographical Map is mostly complete.
THEN I'll be impressed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28536891</id>
	<title>Re:Hiking, etc...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246367940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.</p></div><p>Really? Because the 24k quads are as accurate as they get. Not sure how anything else will give you a better lay of the land. ASTER will provide you with some nice raw data that would require a lot of work to process into any sort of usable topo map. I think far more useful solutions for hikers come from DeLorme's EarthMate series GPS's, which allow you to download digitized 24k USGS topos.</p><p>The GIS community has been prancing around for quite awhile waiting for this data, but for non research/commercial purposes, I'm not sure how useful this really is. Yeah, Google will have better terrain maps before too long, but until PDA/GPS units can send and receive data via satellite accessing that in the field isn't possible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find the topographical maps available okay , but do n't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.Really ?
Because the 24k quads are as accurate as they get .
Not sure how anything else will give you a better lay of the land .
ASTER will provide you with some nice raw data that would require a lot of work to process into any sort of usable topo map .
I think far more useful solutions for hikers come from DeLorme 's EarthMate series GPS 's , which allow you to download digitized 24k USGS topos.The GIS community has been prancing around for quite awhile waiting for this data , but for non research/commercial purposes , I 'm not sure how useful this really is .
Yeah , Google will have better terrain maps before too long , but until PDA/GPS units can send and receive data via satellite accessing that in the field is n't possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.Really?
Because the 24k quads are as accurate as they get.
Not sure how anything else will give you a better lay of the land.
ASTER will provide you with some nice raw data that would require a lot of work to process into any sort of usable topo map.
I think far more useful solutions for hikers come from DeLorme's EarthMate series GPS's, which allow you to download digitized 24k USGS topos.The GIS community has been prancing around for quite awhile waiting for this data, but for non research/commercial purposes, I'm not sure how useful this really is.
Yeah, Google will have better terrain maps before too long, but until PDA/GPS units can send and receive data via satellite accessing that in the field isn't possible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534391</id>
	<title>So, uhm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246354620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Semantically speaking, isn't the "most complete topographical map" of the world always complete?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Semantically speaking , is n't the " most complete topographical map " of the world always complete ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Semantically speaking, isn't the "most complete topographical map" of the world always complete?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532699</id>
	<title>Re:As noted...</title>
	<author>Eccles</author>
	<datestamp>1246390740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As noted by some. This also has been the most detailed fail.</i></p><p>Don't tell me they left the lens cap on *again*!...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As noted by some .
This also has been the most detailed fail.Do n't tell me they left the lens cap on * again * ! .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As noted by some.
This also has been the most detailed fail.Don't tell me they left the lens cap on *again*!...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532165</id>
	<title>Re:If it is what I think it is then... FAIL</title>
	<author>euxneks</author>
	<datestamp>1246388880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt that's the actual location for the dataset. I was able to access their site and they linked off to another place for the ASTER data, to here:
<br>https://wist.echo.nasa.gov/~wist/api/imswelcome/
<br>I cannot access the data however.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt that 's the actual location for the dataset .
I was able to access their site and they linked off to another place for the ASTER data , to here : https : //wist.echo.nasa.gov/ ~ wist/api/imswelcome/ I can not access the data however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt that's the actual location for the dataset.
I was able to access their site and they linked off to another place for the ASTER data, to here:
https://wist.echo.nasa.gov/~wist/api/imswelcome/
I cannot access the data however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535393</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246359720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trouble is that topographical maps wouldn't tell you any useful information about what WE put there.</p><p>It just tells you the terrain.</p><p>The secret missile base would appear a flat plain, just like a shopping center would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble is that topographical maps would n't tell you any useful information about what WE put there.It just tells you the terrain.The secret missile base would appear a flat plain , just like a shopping center would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble is that topographical maps wouldn't tell you any useful information about what WE put there.It just tells you the terrain.The secret missile base would appear a flat plain, just like a shopping center would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531413</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>jnaujok</author>
	<datestamp>1246386240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination did n't allow to be mapped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534793</id>
	<title>Damn stand!</title>
	<author>Drone69</author>
	<datestamp>1246356480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the point where the pedestal stand is connected to the globe that is the unmappable 1\%.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the point where the pedestal stand is connected to the globe that is the unmappable 1 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the point where the pedestal stand is connected to the globe that is the unmappable 1\%.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532319</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Archfeld</author>
	<datestamp>1246389480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>C'mon it is Dick Cheney's house of course<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon it is Dick Cheney 's house of course : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon it is Dick Cheney's house of course :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827</id>
	<title>Hiking, etc...</title>
	<author>PhotoGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1246352400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will (well, could) be great for geek hikers like myself; I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.  Incorporating this map into GPS (or, in the shorter term, some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device) will be very cool...</p><p>Sigh, one of these days I hope to look at the beautiful surroundings nature provides, more than I look at my gadgets I bring with me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Oh well, navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring, to me (whether in a car, boat, or on foot).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will ( well , could ) be great for geek hikers like myself ; I find the topographical maps available okay , but do n't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land .
Incorporating this map into GPS ( or , in the shorter term , some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device ) will be very cool...Sigh , one of these days I hope to look at the beautiful surroundings nature provides , more than I look at my gadgets I bring with me : ) Oh well , navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring , to me ( whether in a car , boat , or on foot ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will (well, could) be great for geek hikers like myself; I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.
Incorporating this map into GPS (or, in the shorter term, some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device) will be very cool...Sigh, one of these days I hope to look at the beautiful surroundings nature provides, more than I look at my gadgets I bring with me :)  Oh well, navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring, to me (whether in a car, boat, or on foot).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28546995</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable domestic news coverage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246477800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC? Not ABC, NBC, CNN, or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency.  It's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC.</p></div><p>Here you go<br>http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/07/01/nasa.earth.map/index.html</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC ?
Not ABC , NBC , CNN , or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency .
It 's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC.Here you gohttp : //www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/07/01/nasa.earth.map/index.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC?
Not ABC, NBC, CNN, or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency.
It's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC.Here you gohttp://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/07/01/nasa.earth.map/index.html
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531831</id>
	<title>Digital Elevation Map (DEM)</title>
	<author>phyr</author>
	<datestamp>1246387800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a digital elevation map at 30m resolution. The only other global DEM freely available is SRTM from a shuttle mission a while ago. It's only available at 90m globally and 30m for the US.
This will be used for orthorectifying images and interferometry of satellite data among other things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a digital elevation map at 30m resolution .
The only other global DEM freely available is SRTM from a shuttle mission a while ago .
It 's only available at 90m globally and 30m for the US .
This will be used for orthorectifying images and interferometry of satellite data among other things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a digital elevation map at 30m resolution.
The only other global DEM freely available is SRTM from a shuttle mission a while ago.
It's only available at 90m globally and 30m for the US.
This will be used for orthorectifying images and interferometry of satellite data among other things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28541919</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>ioshhdflwuegfh</author>
	<datestamp>1246461480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.</p></div><p>And why would the orbital inclination be a problem?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination did n't allow to be mapped.And why would the orbital inclination be a problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.And why would the orbital inclination be a problem?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532049</id>
	<title>Flight simulator users rejoice!</title>
	<author>flowerp</author>
	<datestamp>1246388520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Getting an accurate world elevation map essentially for free is really cool. Previously you had to get one of the commercial scenery DVDs that would set you back at least $50.</p><p>After all, having realistic mointain terrain makes flying much nicer and recognizing land features will be much easier. Then map some Sat terrain on top, for example with the Tileproxy application and everything will look just real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting an accurate world elevation map essentially for free is really cool .
Previously you had to get one of the commercial scenery DVDs that would set you back at least $ 50.After all , having realistic mointain terrain makes flying much nicer and recognizing land features will be much easier .
Then map some Sat terrain on top , for example with the Tileproxy application and everything will look just real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting an accurate world elevation map essentially for free is really cool.
Previously you had to get one of the commercial scenery DVDs that would set you back at least $50.After all, having realistic mointain terrain makes flying much nicer and recognizing land features will be much easier.
Then map some Sat terrain on top, for example with the Tileproxy application and everything will look just real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</id>
	<title>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete</title>
	<author>spdiscus</author>
	<datestamp>1246387800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that always true?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that always true ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that always true?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533761</id>
	<title>Re:Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Comple</title>
	<author>ThrowAwaySociety</author>
	<datestamp>1246395360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't that always true?</p></div><p>Indeed it is. Though there's still room for improvement, as 1\% remains uncompleted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that always true ? Indeed it is .
Though there 's still room for improvement , as 1 \ % remains uncompleted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that always true?Indeed it is.
Though there's still room for improvement, as 1\% remains uncompleted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531757</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1246387440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone know last 1\% isn't mapped? Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization?</p></div><p>It's Barbra Streisand's house.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know last 1 \ % is n't mapped ?
Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization ? It 's Barbra Streisand 's house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know last 1\% isn't mapped?
Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization?It's Barbra Streisand's house.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534863</id>
	<title>99\% isn't good enough?</title>
	<author>RobinH</author>
	<datestamp>1246356780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How bad are we that when they say they mapped 99\% of the Earth, we all ask what was the 1\% that was missed?</p><p>It's like when the poor kid comes home with 99\% on their test, and their father says, "what did you get wrong?".  Talk about giving people a complex!</p><p>By the way, it's probably the poles where the orbital inclination doesn't allow the satellites to see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How bad are we that when they say they mapped 99 \ % of the Earth , we all ask what was the 1 \ % that was missed ? It 's like when the poor kid comes home with 99 \ % on their test , and their father says , " what did you get wrong ? " .
Talk about giving people a complex ! By the way , it 's probably the poles where the orbital inclination does n't allow the satellites to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bad are we that when they say they mapped 99\% of the Earth, we all ask what was the 1\% that was missed?It's like when the poor kid comes home with 99\% on their test, and their father says, "what did you get wrong?".
Talk about giving people a complex!By the way, it's probably the poles where the orbital inclination doesn't allow the satellites to see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531483</id>
	<title>Original Sources</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246386540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apparently, the data will be free to download and use.</p></div><p>You know, it never ceases to amaze me that CNN, BBC, Fox News, everybody who's a major player can't link to the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2009/jun/HQ\_09-150\_ASTER\_Topographic\_Map.html" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">original source of information</a> [nasa.gov] (and <a href="http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/" title="ersdac.or.jp" rel="nofollow">Japan's site</a> [ersdac.or.jp]).  One might find <a href="https://wist.echo.nasa.gov/~wist/api/imswelcome/" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">the warehouse inventory search tool</a> [nasa.gov] (note registration required for ASTER global digital elevation model) interesting to play around with if they are interested in the story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , the data will be free to download and use.You know , it never ceases to amaze me that CNN , BBC , Fox News , everybody who 's a major player ca n't link to the original source of information [ nasa.gov ] ( and Japan 's site [ ersdac.or.jp ] ) .
One might find the warehouse inventory search tool [ nasa.gov ] ( note registration required for ASTER global digital elevation model ) interesting to play around with if they are interested in the story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, the data will be free to download and use.You know, it never ceases to amaze me that CNN, BBC, Fox News, everybody who's a major player can't link to the original source of information [nasa.gov] (and Japan's site [ersdac.or.jp]).
One might find the warehouse inventory search tool [nasa.gov] (note registration required for ASTER global digital elevation model) interesting to play around with if they are interested in the story.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531447</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>stpere</author>
	<datestamp>1246386480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, tax payers already paid for it, no?  I know that you can get topographical data from several government agencies already for free (NASA, USGS, etc...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , tax payers already paid for it , no ?
I know that you can get topographical data from several government agencies already for free ( NASA , USGS , etc... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, tax payers already paid for it, no?
I know that you can get topographical data from several government agencies already for free (NASA, USGS, etc...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535589</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Sephollyon</author>
	<datestamp>1246360680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the "Lost" island. Difficult to map, moving around and all...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the " Lost " island .
Difficult to map , moving around and all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the "Lost" island.
Difficult to map, moving around and all...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531715</id>
	<title>Do it again in 50 years</title>
	<author>Blixinator</author>
	<datestamp>1246387380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be neat to have this done again in 50 years and have an overlay comparison of the two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be neat to have this done again in 50 years and have an overlay comparison of the two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be neat to have this done again in 50 years and have an overlay comparison of the two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531537</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246386780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use? A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it?</i></p><p>What are you, some kind of RIAA mobster?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use ?
A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it ? What are you , some kind of RIAA mobster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use?
A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it?What are you, some kind of RIAA mobster?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28700031</id>
	<title>Re:Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Comple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247591940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete</i></p><p><i>Isn't that always true?</i> </p><p>In fact, it's not.</p><p>Complete is an absolute and therefore does not admit of comparison.</p><p>Phrases such as "most complete", "very unique", "kinda pregnant" and the like are always intrinsically illogical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth CompleteIs n't that always true ?
In fact , it 's not.Complete is an absolute and therefore does not admit of comparison.Phrases such as " most complete " , " very unique " , " kinda pregnant " and the like are always intrinsically illogical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth CompleteIsn't that always true?
In fact, it's not.Complete is an absolute and therefore does not admit of comparison.Phrases such as "most complete", "very unique", "kinda pregnant" and the like are always intrinsically illogical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465</id>
	<title>Remarkable domestic news coverage</title>
	<author>dkh2</author>
	<datestamp>1246389960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC? Not ABC, NBC, CNN, or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency.  It's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC ?
Not ABC , NBC , CNN , or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency .
It 's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anybody else notice that the report of a newsworthy task by U.S. and Japanese agencies was reported by the BBC?
Not ABC, NBC, CNN, or any other U.S. based news agency and certainly not by a Japan based agency.
It's coverage like this that keeps me going back to the BBC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532615</id>
	<title>Down for maintenance?</title>
	<author>holmstar</author>
	<datestamp>1246390440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>* Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:00:00 UT to Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:00:00 UT:<br>

We will be performing maintenance on the LAADS' system on Tuesday, June 30 between 11am and 1pm. There will be intermittent connectivity problems during this time.<br>

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Tue , 30 Jun 2009 04 : 00 : 00 UT to Wed , 01 Jul 2009 04 : 00 : 00 UT : We will be performing maintenance on the LAADS ' system on Tuesday , June 30 between 11am and 1pm .
There will be intermittent connectivity problems during this time .
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:00:00 UT to Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:00:00 UT:

We will be performing maintenance on the LAADS' system on Tuesday, June 30 between 11am and 1pm.
There will be intermittent connectivity problems during this time.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385</id>
	<title>If it is what I think it is then... FAIL</title>
	<author>Inf0phreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246386300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://blogs.thehumanjourney.net/oaubuntu/entry/world\_s\_most\_detailed\_fail" title="thehumanjourney.net">http://blogs.thehumanjourney.net/oaubuntu/entry/world\_s\_most\_detailed\_fail</a> [thehumanjourney.net]
<br> <br>
This error message sums it up pretty well:<p><div class="quote"><p>Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d'
<br> <br>
[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too many client tasks.
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/index.asp, line 3</p></div><p>
Acess?! Really?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //blogs.thehumanjourney.net/oaubuntu/entry/world \ _s \ _most \ _detailed \ _fail [ thehumanjourney.net ] This error message sums it up pretty well : Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d ' [ Microsoft ] [ ODBC Microsoft Access Driver ] Too many client tasks .
/index.asp , line 3 Acess ? !
Really ? !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://blogs.thehumanjourney.net/oaubuntu/entry/world\_s\_most\_detailed\_fail [thehumanjourney.net]
 
This error message sums it up pretty well:Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d'
 
[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too many client tasks.
/index.asp, line 3
Acess?!
Really?!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28537787</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>hoooocheymomma</author>
	<datestamp>1246374900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... if it is complete.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... if it is complete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... if it is complete.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</id>
	<title>The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246385760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone know last 1\% isn't mapped? Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know last 1 \ % is n't mapped ?
Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know last 1\% isn't mapped?
Is it just hard to access or is it part of a top secret organization?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533011</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246392000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They make money the same way linux distor companies to...they don't</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They make money the same way linux distor companies to...they do n't</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They make money the same way linux distor companies to...they don't</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531957</id>
	<title>Re:Original Sources</title>
	<author>rotide</author>
	<datestamp>1246388220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly, you assume that the American media cares about journalism.  Last I checked it was nothing more than biased sensationalism.<p>
Ya, I live in the USA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , you assume that the American media cares about journalism .
Last I checked it was nothing more than biased sensationalism .
Ya , I live in the USA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, you assume that the American media cares about journalism.
Last I checked it was nothing more than biased sensationalism.
Ya, I live in the USA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535045</id>
	<title>Re:Importing ASTER to Google Earth</title>
	<author>Jon\_S</author>
	<datestamp>1246357740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Earth already has elevation data (note, that is what this story is about, elevation data, not aerial photography).  The new stuff is probably more accurate than the elevation data google earth uses to do its 3D display, but the resolution of the new elevation data is much greater than the resolution of the aerial image files, so it would not make a hill of beans difference in what you see in google earth.</p><p>Topofusion, a (cheap, but non-free) mapping program that overlaps in functionality with google earth, does allow you do use your own bring-your-own elevation data rather than use whatever online source it uses, so you could try it there to see if it makes a difference (topofusion has a reduced functionality free version).  I doubt you'd see much difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Earth already has elevation data ( note , that is what this story is about , elevation data , not aerial photography ) .
The new stuff is probably more accurate than the elevation data google earth uses to do its 3D display , but the resolution of the new elevation data is much greater than the resolution of the aerial image files , so it would not make a hill of beans difference in what you see in google earth.Topofusion , a ( cheap , but non-free ) mapping program that overlaps in functionality with google earth , does allow you do use your own bring-your-own elevation data rather than use whatever online source it uses , so you could try it there to see if it makes a difference ( topofusion has a reduced functionality free version ) .
I doubt you 'd see much difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Earth already has elevation data (note, that is what this story is about, elevation data, not aerial photography).
The new stuff is probably more accurate than the elevation data google earth uses to do its 3D display, but the resolution of the new elevation data is much greater than the resolution of the aerial image files, so it would not make a hill of beans difference in what you see in google earth.Topofusion, a (cheap, but non-free) mapping program that overlaps in functionality with google earth, does allow you do use your own bring-your-own elevation data rather than use whatever online source it uses, so you could try it there to see if it makes a difference (topofusion has a reduced functionality free version).
I doubt you'd see much difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531423</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>localman57</author>
	<datestamp>1246386420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The other 1\% is what geographers call the "edge"; the area at which the two sides of the flat earth meet.  Mapping both sides of a flat object is easy.  Unfortunately mapping the edge is much harder.  Just be glad the Earth is flat, not round.  Otherwise, there'd be no accurate way to project it onto a piece of paper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The other 1 \ % is what geographers call the " edge " ; the area at which the two sides of the flat earth meet .
Mapping both sides of a flat object is easy .
Unfortunately mapping the edge is much harder .
Just be glad the Earth is flat , not round .
Otherwise , there 'd be no accurate way to project it onto a piece of paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The other 1\% is what geographers call the "edge"; the area at which the two sides of the flat earth meet.
Mapping both sides of a flat object is easy.
Unfortunately mapping the edge is much harder.
Just be glad the Earth is flat, not round.
Otherwise, there'd be no accurate way to project it onto a piece of paper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532023</id>
	<title>"Apparently, the data will be free to download..."</title>
	<author>neonux</author>
	<datestamp>1246388460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe there will be at least one use for the new Pirate Bay then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe there will be at least one use for the new Pirate Bay then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe there will be at least one use for the new Pirate Bay then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531755</id>
	<title>The TIF File</title>
	<author>NivekEnterprises</author>
	<datestamp>1246387440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone is interested in the TIF file here it is:<br><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/363790main\_PIA12090\_gdem-press-colorized-topo.tif" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/363790main\_PIA12090\_gdem-press-colorized-topo.tif</a> [nasa.gov]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone is interested in the TIF file here it is : http : //www.nasa.gov/images/content/363790main \ _PIA12090 \ _gdem-press-colorized-topo.tif [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone is interested in the TIF file here it is:http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/363790main\_PIA12090\_gdem-press-colorized-topo.tif [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541</id>
	<title>Limited vocabulary?</title>
	<author>TropicalCoder</author>
	<datestamp>1246390200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most <i>Complete</i> Topographical Map of Earth <i>Complete</i> </p><p>They invented the <a href="http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/Complete" title="reference.com">Thesaurus</a> [reference.com] so we could avoid situations like this.</p><p>Main Entry:	complete
<br>
Part of Speech:	verb
<br>
Definition:	carry out action
<br>
Synonyms: accomplish, achieve, actualize, cap, close, conclude, consummate, crown, determine, develop, discharge, do, effect, elaborate, end, equip, execute, fill, finalize, finish, fulfill, furnish, halt, make up, perfect, perform, realize, refine, round off, settle, supplement, terminate, ultimate, wind up*, wrap up*, bring to fruition, bring to maturity, call it a day, carry off, do thoroughly, effectuate, get through, go the limit, go through with, go whole hog, make good, put to bed, round out, sew up</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete They invented the Thesaurus [ reference.com ] so we could avoid situations like this.Main Entry : complete Part of Speech : verb Definition : carry out action Synonyms : accomplish , achieve , actualize , cap , close , conclude , consummate , crown , determine , develop , discharge , do , effect , elaborate , end , equip , execute , fill , finalize , finish , fulfill , furnish , halt , make up , perfect , perform , realize , refine , round off , settle , supplement , terminate , ultimate , wind up * , wrap up * , bring to fruition , bring to maturity , call it a day , carry off , do thoroughly , effectuate , get through , go the limit , go through with , go whole hog , make good , put to bed , round out , sew up</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete They invented the Thesaurus [reference.com] so we could avoid situations like this.Main Entry:	complete

Part of Speech:	verb

Definition:	carry out action

Synonyms: accomplish, achieve, actualize, cap, close, conclude, consummate, crown, determine, develop, discharge, do, effect, elaborate, end, equip, execute, fill, finalize, finish, fulfill, furnish, halt, make up, perfect, perform, realize, refine, round off, settle, supplement, terminate, ultimate, wind up*, wrap up*, bring to fruition, bring to maturity, call it a day, carry off, do thoroughly, effectuate, get through, go the limit, go through with, go whole hog, make good, put to bed, round out, sew up</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531895</id>
	<title>And yet</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246387980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can still get a PhD in Geography~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can still get a PhD in Geography ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can still get a PhD in Geography~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531259</id>
	<title>In other news, Google claims prior art...</title>
	<author>Ann O'Nymous-Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1246385940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duelling lawsuits in 3... 2... 1...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duelling lawsuits in 3... 2... 1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duelling lawsuits in 3... 2... 1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28544621</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable domestic news coverage</title>
	<author>mattwarden</author>
	<datestamp>1246470660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrats? How about all the stuff that gets covered by those news organizations but would never, ever be covered on BBC?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats ?
How about all the stuff that gets covered by those news organizations but would never , ever be covered on BBC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats?
How about all the stuff that gets covered by those news organizations but would never, ever be covered on BBC?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532793</id>
	<title>Re:If it is what I think it is then... FAIL</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1246391100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d'</p><p>[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too many client tasks.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/index.asp, line 3</p></div></blockquote><p>Aw man.  I was hoping the error message would include a graphic of the Fail Shuttle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d ' [ Microsoft ] [ ODBC Microsoft Access Driver ] Too many client tasks .
/index.asp , line 3Aw man .
I was hoping the error message would include a graphic of the Fail Shuttle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e4d'[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too many client tasks.
/index.asp, line 3Aw man.
I was hoping the error message would include a graphic of the Fail Shuttle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199</id>
	<title>Technically free, but not in practice</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1246392840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's likely to happen with this "free" data is that Navteq, TeleAtlas, and Google will grab it for free, but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivative.  NASA's license for it should include clauses demanding fees for any commercial uses, and then donate the fees to the FSF or some other org that benefits the Greater Good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's likely to happen with this " free " data is that Navteq , TeleAtlas , and Google will grab it for free , but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivative .
NASA 's license for it should include clauses demanding fees for any commercial uses , and then donate the fees to the FSF or some other org that benefits the Greater Good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's likely to happen with this "free" data is that Navteq, TeleAtlas, and Google will grab it for free, but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivative.
NASA's license for it should include clauses demanding fees for any commercial uses, and then donate the fees to the FSF or some other org that benefits the Greater Good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Scutter</author>
	<datestamp>1246385940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the hole at the North Pole that leads to the center of the Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the hole at the North Pole that leads to the center of the Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the hole at the North Pole that leads to the center of the Earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593</id>
	<title>Importing ASTER to Google Earth</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246386960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems the project name for this data is ASTER.  Of course, what everyone (like me at least) wants to know is how can we import this stuff into Google Earth or NASA World Wind so we can picture the slopes on that mountain bike trail?</p><p>As far as I can tell (from very briefly scanning the <a href="http://www.wimsoft.com/Exercises\_ASTER.pdf" title="wimsoft.com">Exercises ASTER</a> [wimsoft.com] document earlier), you can do this by downloading some tool that comes from the project itself, and then using it to generate a KML file.</p><p>Not too hard, but does anyone know more, or have a simpler way?  I'm sure Google Eearth and WW will want to get this data incorporated ASAP, if they haven't already done so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems the project name for this data is ASTER .
Of course , what everyone ( like me at least ) wants to know is how can we import this stuff into Google Earth or NASA World Wind so we can picture the slopes on that mountain bike trail ? As far as I can tell ( from very briefly scanning the Exercises ASTER [ wimsoft.com ] document earlier ) , you can do this by downloading some tool that comes from the project itself , and then using it to generate a KML file.Not too hard , but does anyone know more , or have a simpler way ?
I 'm sure Google Eearth and WW will want to get this data incorporated ASAP , if they have n't already done so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems the project name for this data is ASTER.
Of course, what everyone (like me at least) wants to know is how can we import this stuff into Google Earth or NASA World Wind so we can picture the slopes on that mountain bike trail?As far as I can tell (from very briefly scanning the Exercises ASTER [wimsoft.com] document earlier), you can do this by downloading some tool that comes from the project itself, and then using it to generate a KML file.Not too hard, but does anyone know more, or have a simpler way?
I'm sure Google Eearth and WW will want to get this data incorporated ASAP, if they haven't already done so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531529</id>
	<title>How often...</title>
	<author>rehtonAesoohC</author>
	<datestamp>1246386720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...will they update it? With all the movements throughout the globe from earthquakes, volcanoes, tectonic movement, etc, you'd think this data would be invalidated in 5-10 years.<br> <br>IANAG though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...will they update it ?
With all the movements throughout the globe from earthquakes , volcanoes , tectonic movement , etc , you 'd think this data would be invalidated in 5-10 years .
IANAG though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...will they update it?
With all the movements throughout the globe from earthquakes, volcanoes, tectonic movement, etc, you'd think this data would be invalidated in 5-10 years.
IANAG though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532815</id>
	<title>Re:Importing ASTER to Google Earth</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1246391160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'm more interested in how this could be gotten into openstreetmap. instead of pushing data into another restricted system, getting it out to as many people as possible would be more beneficial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm more interested in how this could be gotten into openstreetmap .
instead of pushing data into another restricted system , getting it out to as many people as possible would be more beneficial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'm more interested in how this could be gotten into openstreetmap.
instead of pushing data into another restricted system, getting it out to as many people as possible would be more beneficial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538731</id>
	<title>Re:This must be stopped!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246385160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guys, the parent's post is painfully sarcastic, I can't believe it's garnering insightful mods, please...</p><p>funny, yes, insightful will probably just make Minwee as sad as I...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guys , the parent 's post is painfully sarcastic , I ca n't believe it 's garnering insightful mods , please...funny , yes , insightful will probably just make Minwee as sad as I.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guys, the parent's post is painfully sarcastic, I can't believe it's garnering insightful mods, please...funny, yes, insightful will probably just make Minwee as sad as I...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532509</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531309</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246386060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the area around the topographical mapping equipment building.  if they point the equipment at itself, it creates a paradox and the universe implodes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the area around the topographical mapping equipment building .
if they point the equipment at itself , it creates a paradox and the universe implodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the area around the topographical mapping equipment building.
if they point the equipment at itself, it creates a paradox and the universe implodes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532415</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>elcid73</author>
	<datestamp>1246389780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe it's Mt. Sneffels in Iceland.  At least that's what Arne Saknussem led me to believe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe it 's Mt .
Sneffels in Iceland .
At least that 's what Arne Saknussem led me to believe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe it's Mt.
Sneffels in Iceland.
At least that's what Arne Saknussem led me to believe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1246387320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use?</p></div></blockquote><p>They break even by people finding profitable uses for it, which then produce tax revenue. Remember, the agencies doing this are US and Japanese <i>government agencies</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use ? They break even by people finding profitable uses for it , which then produce tax revenue .
Remember , the agencies doing this are US and Japanese government agencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use?They break even by people finding profitable uses for it, which then produce tax revenue.
Remember, the agencies doing this are US and Japanese government agencies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28688617</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247572800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do they keep water from getting in?</p><p>You know: The North Pole is just some ice, and no continent or any land.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they keep water from getting in ? You know : The North Pole is just some ice , and no continent or any land .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they keep water from getting in?You know: The North Pole is just some ice, and no continent or any land.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28540997</id>
	<title>Complete?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246456140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's not 100\% complete, how do they decide that it's complete?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's not 100 \ % complete , how do they decide that it 's complete ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's not 100\% complete, how do they decide that it's complete?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531953</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>nickruiz</author>
	<datestamp>1246388220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard that they had originally mapped 100\% of the Earth's surface, but once Chuck Norris found out that they were mapping his house, he went over to NASA and proceeded to roundhouse kick each scientist until they removed the entire state of Texas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that they had originally mapped 100 \ % of the Earth 's surface , but once Chuck Norris found out that they were mapping his house , he went over to NASA and proceeded to roundhouse kick each scientist until they removed the entire state of Texas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that they had originally mapped 100\% of the Earth's surface, but once Chuck Norris found out that they were mapping his house, he went over to NASA and proceeded to roundhouse kick each scientist until they removed the entire state of Texas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535155</id>
	<title>Re:Technically free, but not in practice</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246358280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The previous SRTM data is available completely free to the end-user. I downloaded several gigabytes of it for use in my thesis.</p><p>There are commercial vendors who will provide you somewhat better versions of it - with the holes filled, and the individual tiles stitched together. But for someone actually working with the data, that's not really worth much because you can do it yourself in a few minutes.</p><p>I'm trying to get the new data right now - I'm still working on my thesis and this will be really great stuff - and it appears it's pretty much the same set-up as before.</p><p>Basically, there's no need for cynicism. The people at NASA, USGS, and other government science agencies really do want their data to be free and accessible by anyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The previous SRTM data is available completely free to the end-user .
I downloaded several gigabytes of it for use in my thesis.There are commercial vendors who will provide you somewhat better versions of it - with the holes filled , and the individual tiles stitched together .
But for someone actually working with the data , that 's not really worth much because you can do it yourself in a few minutes.I 'm trying to get the new data right now - I 'm still working on my thesis and this will be really great stuff - and it appears it 's pretty much the same set-up as before.Basically , there 's no need for cynicism .
The people at NASA , USGS , and other government science agencies really do want their data to be free and accessible by anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The previous SRTM data is available completely free to the end-user.
I downloaded several gigabytes of it for use in my thesis.There are commercial vendors who will provide you somewhat better versions of it - with the holes filled, and the individual tiles stitched together.
But for someone actually working with the data, that's not really worth much because you can do it yourself in a few minutes.I'm trying to get the new data right now - I'm still working on my thesis and this will be really great stuff - and it appears it's pretty much the same set-up as before.Basically, there's no need for cynicism.
The people at NASA, USGS, and other government science agencies really do want their data to be free and accessible by anyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532747</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>kms\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1246390920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That proves it. Obama is a communist!!
Run for the hills! Without a profit motive this cannot exist.
The sky is falling.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH</htmltext>
<tokenext>That proves it .
Obama is a communist ! !
Run for the hills !
Without a profit motive this can not exist .
The sky is falling .
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That proves it.
Obama is a communist!!
Run for the hills!
Without a profit motive this cannot exist.
The sky is falling.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532461</id>
	<title>Damn right it is!</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1246389960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p> Apparently, the data will be free to download and use."</p></div><p>My tax dollars already paid for this info.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>  Apparently , the data will be free to download and use .
" My tax dollars already paid for this info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
   Apparently, the data will be free to download and use.
"My tax dollars already paid for this info.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532597</id>
	<title>POV-Ray</title>
	<author>dkh2</author>
	<datestamp>1246390380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many raytracing nerds will pull this into POV-Ray as source data for a spherically warped height field?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many raytracing nerds will pull this into POV-Ray as source data for a spherically warped height field ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many raytracing nerds will pull this into POV-Ray as source data for a spherically warped height field?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532447</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246389900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that the one you throw people down with the high school physics problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that the one you throw people down with the high school physics problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that the one you throw people down with the high school physics problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535799</id>
	<title>Re:Technically free, but not in practice</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246361820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, we will pay for the service those companies provide by putting the data into a easily usable form for people. What is your beef? You can take the data and create  tool to use as well. You could even then sell that tool Shocking~</p><p>I hate that monthly subscription I have to pay to access Google Earth~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , we will pay for the service those companies provide by putting the data into a easily usable form for people .
What is your beef ?
You can take the data and create tool to use as well .
You could even then sell that tool Shocking ~ I hate that monthly subscription I have to pay to access Google Earth ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, we will pay for the service those companies provide by putting the data into a easily usable form for people.
What is your beef?
You can take the data and create  tool to use as well.
You could even then sell that tool Shocking~I hate that monthly subscription I have to pay to access Google Earth~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532781</id>
	<title>Only 99\%????</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1246391100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe that is what is commonly referred to as: "close enough for government work."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that is what is commonly referred to as : " close enough for government work .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that is what is commonly referred to as: "close enough for government work.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535775</id>
	<title>Re:Limited vocabulary?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246361640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most perform Topographical Map of Earth end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most perform Topographical Map of Earth end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most perform Topographical Map of Earth end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531517</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>barzok</author>
	<datestamp>1246386660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 sq km here, 10 sq km there, pretty soon you're talking about real surface area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 sq km here , 10 sq km there , pretty soon you 're talking about real surface area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 sq km here, 10 sq km there, pretty soon you're talking about real surface area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531785</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1246387560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This obviously can only be settled via a Slashdot poll. My suggestions for options:<br>- Dick Cheney's undisclosed location<br>- The North Pole<br>- Cobra base<br>- R'lyeh<br>- Google's secret undersea base<br>- CowboyNeal's home</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This obviously can only be settled via a Slashdot poll .
My suggestions for options : - Dick Cheney 's undisclosed location- The North Pole- Cobra base- R'lyeh- Google 's secret undersea base- CowboyNeal 's home</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This obviously can only be settled via a Slashdot poll.
My suggestions for options:- Dick Cheney's undisclosed location- The North Pole- Cobra base- R'lyeh- Google's secret undersea base- CowboyNeal's home</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28542349</id>
	<title>Re:Hiking, etc...</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1246463220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This will (well, could) be great for geek hikers like myself; I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, given that the map discussed in the article is nothing but a topographical map...  The fancy pictures of the terrain are renders produced from the dataset and could equally easily be produced from current topographic maps/datasets.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Incorporating this map into GPS (or, in the shorter term, some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device) will be very cool</p></div></blockquote><p>When this map is integrated into current maps, or even into new maps, you'll likely not even notice the difference.  A map can only contain so much information due to the limits of graphical presentation.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Oh well, navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring, to me (whether in a car, boat, or on foot).</p></div></blockquote><p>But apparently understanding what you are looking at isn't.  (Oh for the days when 'geek' meant 'learning and understanding things' rather than 'plays with the latest gadgets as if they were just expensive gaming consoles'.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will ( well , could ) be great for geek hikers like myself ; I find the topographical maps available okay , but do n't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.Well , given that the map discussed in the article is nothing but a topographical map... The fancy pictures of the terrain are renders produced from the dataset and could equally easily be produced from current topographic maps/datasets .
  Incorporating this map into GPS ( or , in the shorter term , some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device ) will be very coolWhen this map is integrated into current maps , or even into new maps , you 'll likely not even notice the difference .
A map can only contain so much information due to the limits of graphical presentation .
  Oh well , navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring , to me ( whether in a car , boat , or on foot ) .But apparently understanding what you are looking at is n't .
( Oh for the days when 'geek ' meant 'learning and understanding things ' rather than 'plays with the latest gadgets as if they were just expensive gaming consoles' .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will (well, could) be great for geek hikers like myself; I find the topographical maps available okay, but don't really give one an accurate feel for the lay of the land.Well, given that the map discussed in the article is nothing but a topographical map...  The fancy pictures of the terrain are renders produced from the dataset and could equally easily be produced from current topographic maps/datasets.
  Incorporating this map into GPS (or, in the shorter term, some open source mapping software on a PDA-sized device) will be very coolWhen this map is integrated into current maps, or even into new maps, you'll likely not even notice the difference.
A map can only contain so much information due to the limits of graphical presentation.
  Oh well, navigating/mapping is half the fun of exploring, to me (whether in a car, boat, or on foot).But apparently understanding what you are looking at isn't.
(Oh for the days when 'geek' meant 'learning and understanding things' rather than 'plays with the latest gadgets as if they were just expensive gaming consoles'.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532283</id>
	<title>Re:Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Comple</title>
	<author>qzak</author>
	<datestamp>1246389360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete <br> <br>

Brought to you by the department of redundancy department.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete Brought to you by the department of redundancy department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Complete  

Brought to you by the department of redundancy department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535109</id>
	<title>Re:Limited vocabulary?</title>
	<author>wcrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1246358040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps the headline was written by NASA's Department Of Redundancy Department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps the headline was written by NASA 's Department Of Redundancy Department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps the headline was written by NASA's Department Of Redundancy Department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535041</id>
	<title>Re:Importing ASTER to Google Earth</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246357680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The elevation data in Google Earth and World Wind is apparently already based upon the previous best data available - either the SRTM 90m data, or digitized topographic maps. They don't really specify (at least as far as I could tell) but the Google Earth data matches pretty well with the SRTM data.</p><p>That said, the best way to handle data like this is not in Google Earth. I'm guessing eventually they will update their data to incorporate this, unless they are actually using another source. In the mean time, you can use the data directly in a GIS program.</p><p>I'm a grad student using this data for my thesis, so I have access to advanced tools, most importantly ArcGIS (you can, of course, find this on any good torrent site) which allows for all kinds of great analyses. However, I have also played around with the open source GRASS GIS and qgis, and for basic stuff they should be pretty good. You can't get a 3D view in qgis, though - it may be possible in GRASS, I'm not sure.</p><p>For programs focused on DEMs, check out MicroDEM and 3DEM, as detailed in articles on this site: <a href="http://freegeographytools.com/series" title="freegeographytools.com">http://freegeographytools.com/series</a> [freegeographytools.com]. You can get your 3D views and a heck of a lot more with those programs. I'm pretty sure those are going to be Windows programs, though.</p><p>Google Earth is probably good enough, of course. If the tool you mention works, I don't see why you wouldn't want to just use that to get your KML file. I don't find Google Earth that useful for my thesis work (besides the fact that it hard-freezes my computer - probably an Intel video card issue with the Linux drivers, but I can't figure out a solution), but for basic visualizations it is perfect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The elevation data in Google Earth and World Wind is apparently already based upon the previous best data available - either the SRTM 90m data , or digitized topographic maps .
They do n't really specify ( at least as far as I could tell ) but the Google Earth data matches pretty well with the SRTM data.That said , the best way to handle data like this is not in Google Earth .
I 'm guessing eventually they will update their data to incorporate this , unless they are actually using another source .
In the mean time , you can use the data directly in a GIS program.I 'm a grad student using this data for my thesis , so I have access to advanced tools , most importantly ArcGIS ( you can , of course , find this on any good torrent site ) which allows for all kinds of great analyses .
However , I have also played around with the open source GRASS GIS and qgis , and for basic stuff they should be pretty good .
You ca n't get a 3D view in qgis , though - it may be possible in GRASS , I 'm not sure.For programs focused on DEMs , check out MicroDEM and 3DEM , as detailed in articles on this site : http : //freegeographytools.com/series [ freegeographytools.com ] .
You can get your 3D views and a heck of a lot more with those programs .
I 'm pretty sure those are going to be Windows programs , though.Google Earth is probably good enough , of course .
If the tool you mention works , I do n't see why you would n't want to just use that to get your KML file .
I do n't find Google Earth that useful for my thesis work ( besides the fact that it hard-freezes my computer - probably an Intel video card issue with the Linux drivers , but I ca n't figure out a solution ) , but for basic visualizations it is perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The elevation data in Google Earth and World Wind is apparently already based upon the previous best data available - either the SRTM 90m data, or digitized topographic maps.
They don't really specify (at least as far as I could tell) but the Google Earth data matches pretty well with the SRTM data.That said, the best way to handle data like this is not in Google Earth.
I'm guessing eventually they will update their data to incorporate this, unless they are actually using another source.
In the mean time, you can use the data directly in a GIS program.I'm a grad student using this data for my thesis, so I have access to advanced tools, most importantly ArcGIS (you can, of course, find this on any good torrent site) which allows for all kinds of great analyses.
However, I have also played around with the open source GRASS GIS and qgis, and for basic stuff they should be pretty good.
You can't get a 3D view in qgis, though - it may be possible in GRASS, I'm not sure.For programs focused on DEMs, check out MicroDEM and 3DEM, as detailed in articles on this site: http://freegeographytools.com/series [freegeographytools.com].
You can get your 3D views and a heck of a lot more with those programs.
I'm pretty sure those are going to be Windows programs, though.Google Earth is probably good enough, of course.
If the tool you mention works, I don't see why you wouldn't want to just use that to get your KML file.
I don't find Google Earth that useful for my thesis work (besides the fact that it hard-freezes my computer - probably an Intel video card issue with the Linux drivers, but I can't figure out a solution), but for basic visualizations it is perfect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535635</id>
	<title>Re:Technically free, but not in practice</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246360920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> What's likely to happen with this "free" data is that Navteq, TeleAtlas, and Google will grab it for free, but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivative</p></div><p>And what's wrong with that?  Providing a nice UI is a value-added service.  If you don't think it adds any value then just grab the source data, store it yourself, and use your own UI.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's likely to happen with this " free " data is that Navteq , TeleAtlas , and Google will grab it for free , but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivativeAnd what 's wrong with that ?
Providing a nice UI is a value-added service .
If you do n't think it adds any value then just grab the source data , store it yourself , and use your own UI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What's likely to happen with this "free" data is that Navteq, TeleAtlas, and Google will grab it for free, but then the rest of us will have to pay dearly for the privilege of using their commercialized derivativeAnd what's wrong with that?
Providing a nice UI is a value-added service.
If you don't think it adds any value then just grab the source data, store it yourself, and use your own UI.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535177</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246358400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if your top-secret facility needs hidden from a topo map, it only makes sense to black out a large surrounding area as well, to make it look like a gap/seam issue, and not draw attention to it, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if your top-secret facility needs hidden from a topo map , it only makes sense to black out a large surrounding area as well , to make it look like a gap/seam issue , and not draw attention to it , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if your top-secret facility needs hidden from a topo map, it only makes sense to black out a large surrounding area as well, to make it look like a gap/seam issue, and not draw attention to it, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533691</id>
	<title>What is the land area of the Earth</title>
	<author>BigGar'</author>
	<datestamp>1246395060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I look up the total land area of the earth i get different numbers ranging from 148M sq. km to 153M sq. km.<br>So an average of 150.5M sq. km + or minus @2.5M sq. km  or @965k sq. miles</p><p>So they're mapping to less than the margin of error for different sources as to the total land area.<br>But what I find interesting is that there appears to be variations equal to three times the area of Alaska (656k sq. Miles).</p><p><a href="http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/DanielChen.shtml" title="hypertextbook.com">http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/DanielChen.shtml</a> [hypertextbook.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I look up the total land area of the earth i get different numbers ranging from 148M sq .
km to 153M sq .
km.So an average of 150.5M sq .
km + or minus @ 2.5M sq .
km or @ 965k sq .
milesSo they 're mapping to less than the margin of error for different sources as to the total land area.But what I find interesting is that there appears to be variations equal to three times the area of Alaska ( 656k sq .
Miles ) .http : //hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/DanielChen.shtml [ hypertextbook.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I look up the total land area of the earth i get different numbers ranging from 148M sq.
km to 153M sq.
km.So an average of 150.5M sq.
km + or minus @2.5M sq.
km  or @965k sq.
milesSo they're mapping to less than the margin of error for different sources as to the total land area.But what I find interesting is that there appears to be variations equal to three times the area of Alaska (656k sq.
Miles).http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/DanielChen.shtml [hypertextbook.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531555</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>kbob88</author>
	<datestamp>1246386840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the area around the LHC. When they turned it on, it really did create small black holes, which of course don't let any light or other EMR escape. So the satellites can't see in past their event horizon. Or something like that.</p><p>Or maybe they just got lazy, blew off work, went home, and cracked open a few beers. "Come on, Seiji, no one will notice that we didn't map the last 1\%; it's just a measly 5mm km2. Let's hit the bar!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the area around the LHC .
When they turned it on , it really did create small black holes , which of course do n't let any light or other EMR escape .
So the satellites ca n't see in past their event horizon .
Or something like that.Or maybe they just got lazy , blew off work , went home , and cracked open a few beers .
" Come on , Seiji , no one will notice that we did n't map the last 1 \ % ; it 's just a measly 5mm km2 .
Let 's hit the bar !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the area around the LHC.
When they turned it on, it really did create small black holes, which of course don't let any light or other EMR escape.
So the satellites can't see in past their event horizon.
Or something like that.Or maybe they just got lazy, blew off work, went home, and cracked open a few beers.
"Come on, Seiji, no one will notice that we didn't map the last 1\%; it's just a measly 5mm km2.
Let's hit the bar!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531319</id>
	<title>I don't like this idea but I will post my thoughts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246386120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rob Malda is a 26-year old white male with a stocky build and a beard. His head is shaved. He responded to my ad to be interviewed for this article wearing only leather pants, leather boots and a leather vest. I could see that both of his nipples were pierced with large-gauge silver rings.</p><p>Questioner: I hope you won't be offended if I ask you to prove to me that you're a nullo. Just so that our readers will know that this isn't a fake.</p><p>Rob: Sure, no problem. (stands and unbuckles pants and drops them to his ankles, revealing a smooth, shaven crotch with only a thin scar to show where his genitals once were).</p><p>Q: Thank you. That's a remarkable sight.</p><p>(laughs and pulls pants back up). Most people think so.</p><p>Q: What made you decide to become a nullo?</p><p>(pauses). Well, it really wasn't entirely my decision.</p><p>Q: Excuse me?</p><p>The idea wasn't mine. It was my lover's idea.</p><p>Q: Please explain what you mean.</p><p>Okay, it's a long story. You have to understand my relationship with Michael before you'll know what happened.</p><p>Q: We have plenty of time. Please go on.</p><p>Both of us were into the leather lifestyle when we met through a personal ad. Michael's ad was very specific: he was looking for someone to completely dominate and modify to his pleasure. In other word, a slave.</p><p>The ad intrigued me. I had been in a number of B&amp;D scenes and also some S&amp;M, but I found them unsatisfying because they were all temporary. After the fun was over, everybody went on with life as usual.</p><p>I was looking for a complete life change. I wanted to meet someone who would be part of my life forever. Someone who would control me and change me at his whim.</p><p>Q: In other words, you're a true masochist.</p><p>Oh yes, no doubt about that. I've always been totally passive in my sexual relationships.</p><p>Anyway, we met and there was instant chemistry. Michael is a few years older than me and very good looking. Our personalities meshed totally. He's very dominant.</p><p>I went back to his place after drinks and had the best sex of my life. That's when I knew I was going to be with Michael for a long, long time.</p><p>Q: What sort of things did you two do?</p><p>It was very heavy right away. He restrained me and whipped me for quite awhile. He put clamps on my nipples and a ball gag in my mouth. And he hung a ball bag on my sack with some very heavy weights. That bag really bounced around when Michael fucked me from behind.</p><p>Q: Ouch.</p><p>(laughs) Yeah, no kidding. At first I didn't think I could take the pain, but Michael worked me through it and after awhile I was flying. I was sorry when it was over.</p><p>Michael enjoyed it as much as I did. Afterwards he talked about what kind of a commitment I'd have to make if I wanted to stay with him.</p><p>Q: What did he say exactly?</p><p>Well, besides agreeing to be his slave in every way, I'd have to be ready to be modified. To have my body modified.</p><p>Q: Did he explain what he meant by that?</p><p>Not specifically, but I got the general idea. I guessed that something like castration might be part of it.</p><p>Q: How did that make you feel?</p><p>(laughs) I think it would make any guy a little hesitant.</p><p>Q: But it didn't stop you from agreeing to Michael's terms?</p><p>No it didn't. I was totally hooked on this man. I knew that I was willing to pay any price to be with him.</p><p>Anyway, a few days later I moved in with Michael. He gave me the rules right away: I'd have to be naked at all times while we were indoors, except for a leather dog collar that I could never take off. I had to keep my head shaved. And I had to wear a butt plug except when I needed to take a shit or when we were having sex.</p><p>I had to sleep on the floor next to his bed. I ate all my food on the floor, too.</p><p>The next day he took me to a piercing parlor where he had my nipples done, and a Prince Albert put into the head of my cock.</p><p>Q: Heavy stuff.</p><p>Yeah, and it got heavier. He used me as a toilet, pissing in my mouth. I had to l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rob Malda is a 26-year old white male with a stocky build and a beard .
His head is shaved .
He responded to my ad to be interviewed for this article wearing only leather pants , leather boots and a leather vest .
I could see that both of his nipples were pierced with large-gauge silver rings.Questioner : I hope you wo n't be offended if I ask you to prove to me that you 're a nullo .
Just so that our readers will know that this is n't a fake.Rob : Sure , no problem .
( stands and unbuckles pants and drops them to his ankles , revealing a smooth , shaven crotch with only a thin scar to show where his genitals once were ) .Q : Thank you .
That 's a remarkable sight .
( laughs and pulls pants back up ) .
Most people think so.Q : What made you decide to become a nullo ? ( pauses ) .
Well , it really was n't entirely my decision.Q : Excuse me ? The idea was n't mine .
It was my lover 's idea.Q : Please explain what you mean.Okay , it 's a long story .
You have to understand my relationship with Michael before you 'll know what happened.Q : We have plenty of time .
Please go on.Both of us were into the leather lifestyle when we met through a personal ad .
Michael 's ad was very specific : he was looking for someone to completely dominate and modify to his pleasure .
In other word , a slave.The ad intrigued me .
I had been in a number of B&amp;D scenes and also some S&amp;M , but I found them unsatisfying because they were all temporary .
After the fun was over , everybody went on with life as usual.I was looking for a complete life change .
I wanted to meet someone who would be part of my life forever .
Someone who would control me and change me at his whim.Q : In other words , you 're a true masochist.Oh yes , no doubt about that .
I 've always been totally passive in my sexual relationships.Anyway , we met and there was instant chemistry .
Michael is a few years older than me and very good looking .
Our personalities meshed totally .
He 's very dominant.I went back to his place after drinks and had the best sex of my life .
That 's when I knew I was going to be with Michael for a long , long time.Q : What sort of things did you two do ? It was very heavy right away .
He restrained me and whipped me for quite awhile .
He put clamps on my nipples and a ball gag in my mouth .
And he hung a ball bag on my sack with some very heavy weights .
That bag really bounced around when Michael fucked me from behind.Q : Ouch .
( laughs ) Yeah , no kidding .
At first I did n't think I could take the pain , but Michael worked me through it and after awhile I was flying .
I was sorry when it was over.Michael enjoyed it as much as I did .
Afterwards he talked about what kind of a commitment I 'd have to make if I wanted to stay with him.Q : What did he say exactly ? Well , besides agreeing to be his slave in every way , I 'd have to be ready to be modified .
To have my body modified.Q : Did he explain what he meant by that ? Not specifically , but I got the general idea .
I guessed that something like castration might be part of it.Q : How did that make you feel ?
( laughs ) I think it would make any guy a little hesitant.Q : But it did n't stop you from agreeing to Michael 's terms ? No it did n't .
I was totally hooked on this man .
I knew that I was willing to pay any price to be with him.Anyway , a few days later I moved in with Michael .
He gave me the rules right away : I 'd have to be naked at all times while we were indoors , except for a leather dog collar that I could never take off .
I had to keep my head shaved .
And I had to wear a butt plug except when I needed to take a shit or when we were having sex.I had to sleep on the floor next to his bed .
I ate all my food on the floor , too.The next day he took me to a piercing parlor where he had my nipples done , and a Prince Albert put into the head of my cock.Q : Heavy stuff.Yeah , and it got heavier .
He used me as a toilet , pissing in my mouth .
I had to l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rob Malda is a 26-year old white male with a stocky build and a beard.
His head is shaved.
He responded to my ad to be interviewed for this article wearing only leather pants, leather boots and a leather vest.
I could see that both of his nipples were pierced with large-gauge silver rings.Questioner: I hope you won't be offended if I ask you to prove to me that you're a nullo.
Just so that our readers will know that this isn't a fake.Rob: Sure, no problem.
(stands and unbuckles pants and drops them to his ankles, revealing a smooth, shaven crotch with only a thin scar to show where his genitals once were).Q: Thank you.
That's a remarkable sight.
(laughs and pulls pants back up).
Most people think so.Q: What made you decide to become a nullo?(pauses).
Well, it really wasn't entirely my decision.Q: Excuse me?The idea wasn't mine.
It was my lover's idea.Q: Please explain what you mean.Okay, it's a long story.
You have to understand my relationship with Michael before you'll know what happened.Q: We have plenty of time.
Please go on.Both of us were into the leather lifestyle when we met through a personal ad.
Michael's ad was very specific: he was looking for someone to completely dominate and modify to his pleasure.
In other word, a slave.The ad intrigued me.
I had been in a number of B&amp;D scenes and also some S&amp;M, but I found them unsatisfying because they were all temporary.
After the fun was over, everybody went on with life as usual.I was looking for a complete life change.
I wanted to meet someone who would be part of my life forever.
Someone who would control me and change me at his whim.Q: In other words, you're a true masochist.Oh yes, no doubt about that.
I've always been totally passive in my sexual relationships.Anyway, we met and there was instant chemistry.
Michael is a few years older than me and very good looking.
Our personalities meshed totally.
He's very dominant.I went back to his place after drinks and had the best sex of my life.
That's when I knew I was going to be with Michael for a long, long time.Q: What sort of things did you two do?It was very heavy right away.
He restrained me and whipped me for quite awhile.
He put clamps on my nipples and a ball gag in my mouth.
And he hung a ball bag on my sack with some very heavy weights.
That bag really bounced around when Michael fucked me from behind.Q: Ouch.
(laughs) Yeah, no kidding.
At first I didn't think I could take the pain, but Michael worked me through it and after awhile I was flying.
I was sorry when it was over.Michael enjoyed it as much as I did.
Afterwards he talked about what kind of a commitment I'd have to make if I wanted to stay with him.Q: What did he say exactly?Well, besides agreeing to be his slave in every way, I'd have to be ready to be modified.
To have my body modified.Q: Did he explain what he meant by that?Not specifically, but I got the general idea.
I guessed that something like castration might be part of it.Q: How did that make you feel?
(laughs) I think it would make any guy a little hesitant.Q: But it didn't stop you from agreeing to Michael's terms?No it didn't.
I was totally hooked on this man.
I knew that I was willing to pay any price to be with him.Anyway, a few days later I moved in with Michael.
He gave me the rules right away: I'd have to be naked at all times while we were indoors, except for a leather dog collar that I could never take off.
I had to keep my head shaved.
And I had to wear a butt plug except when I needed to take a shit or when we were having sex.I had to sleep on the floor next to his bed.
I ate all my food on the floor, too.The next day he took me to a piercing parlor where he had my nipples done, and a Prince Albert put into the head of my cock.Q: Heavy stuff.Yeah, and it got heavier.
He used me as a toilet, pissing in my mouth.
I had to l</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535593</id>
	<title>Forgot to mention - Google is probably better</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246360740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I should have mentioned, actually, that for North America, Google Earth probably has better resolution elevation data than this. I think it's based on topographic maps, which have approximately 12-15m resolution, while this new data has 30m resolution. So you might not actually see any improvement in your mountain bike trail profile in Google Earth. However, it may very well be interesting to import it anyway to see the differences. I'm not sure how Google processes the elevation data and it may very well be inaccurate in some places.</p><p>Where this new data is really useful is for the rest of the world, where high resolution digital data was not available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I should have mentioned , actually , that for North America , Google Earth probably has better resolution elevation data than this .
I think it 's based on topographic maps , which have approximately 12-15m resolution , while this new data has 30m resolution .
So you might not actually see any improvement in your mountain bike trail profile in Google Earth .
However , it may very well be interesting to import it anyway to see the differences .
I 'm not sure how Google processes the elevation data and it may very well be inaccurate in some places.Where this new data is really useful is for the rest of the world , where high resolution digital data was not available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I should have mentioned, actually, that for North America, Google Earth probably has better resolution elevation data than this.
I think it's based on topographic maps, which have approximately 12-15m resolution, while this new data has 30m resolution.
So you might not actually see any improvement in your mountain bike trail profile in Google Earth.
However, it may very well be interesting to import it anyway to see the differences.
I'm not sure how Google processes the elevation data and it may very well be inaccurate in some places.Where this new data is really useful is for the rest of the world, where high resolution digital data was not available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531255</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246385940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the Cobra secret base.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the Cobra secret base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the Cobra secret base.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532305</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246389420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>5.100.720 km</p></div><p>To put that in perspective, it's about the size of Australia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>5.100.720 kmTo put that in perspective , it 's about the size of Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5.100.720 kmTo put that in perspective, it's about the size of Australia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538241</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>subitophoto</author>
	<datestamp>1246379220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"or is it part of a top secret organization?"</p><p>My guess, most unmapped terrain is not secret. WHy? Because 1\% of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge. THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km. 1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 km. Such a large area can't be secret in its entirety.</p></div><p>What if the 1\% is not continuous space?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" or is it part of a top secret organization ?
" My guess , most unmapped terrain is not secret .
WHy ? Because 1 \ % of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge .
THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km .
1 \ % would be 5.100.720 km , which is 2258x2258 km .
Such a large area ca n't be secret in its entirety.What if the 1 \ % is not continuous space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"or is it part of a top secret organization?
"My guess, most unmapped terrain is not secret.
WHy? Because 1\% of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge.
THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km.
1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 km.
Such a large area can't be secret in its entirety.What if the 1\% is not continuous space?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531685</id>
	<title>Gaming on the Earth</title>
	<author>TheGothicGuardian</author>
	<datestamp>1246387260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This, combined with Google Maps or the like, could help in making a nice video game or two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This , combined with Google Maps or the like , could help in making a nice video game or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This, combined with Google Maps or the like, could help in making a nice video game or two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531949</id>
	<title>Re:Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246388220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have already been paid for it, by the taxpayers. That is why it's available at no further cost, something most sane people refer to as being free when talking in general terms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have already been paid for it , by the taxpayers .
That is why it 's available at no further cost , something most sane people refer to as being free when talking in general terms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have already been paid for it, by the taxpayers.
That is why it's available at no further cost, something most sane people refer to as being free when talking in general terms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246386420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"or is it part of a top secret organization?"</p><p>My guess, most unmapped terrain is not secret. WHy? Because 1\% of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge. THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km. 1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 km. Such a large area can't be secret in its entirety.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" or is it part of a top secret organization ?
" My guess , most unmapped terrain is not secret .
WHy ? Because 1 \ % of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge .
THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km .
1 \ % would be 5.100.720 km , which is 2258x2258 km .
Such a large area ca n't be secret in its entirety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"or is it part of a top secret organization?
"My guess, most unmapped terrain is not secret.
WHy? Because 1\% of the surface of the earth is absolutely huge.
THe surface area of earth is 510.072.000 km.
1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 km.
Such a large area can't be secret in its entirety.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531333</id>
	<title>As noted...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246386180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://blogs.thehumanjourney.net/oaubuntu/entry/world\_s\_most\_detailed\_fail" title="thehumanjourney.net" rel="nofollow">As noted by some.  This also has been the most detailed fail.</a> [thehumanjourney.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>As noted by some .
This also has been the most detailed fail .
[ thehumanjourney.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As noted by some.
This also has been the most detailed fail.
[thehumanjourney.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531161</id>
	<title>First Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246385640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gay Nigger Association of America.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gay Nigger Association of America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gay Nigger Association of America.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28575501</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1246618620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>RE:sig
It should be: <p><div class="quote"><p>If (!(daysToChristmas)&amp;&amp;giftsLeftToBuy) Panic();<br>/*When daysToChristmas equals zero,<br>it evaluates to true with the bang prefix.<br>Non-zero values of giftsLeftToBuy <br>evaluate to true.*/</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>RE : sig It should be : If ( !
( daysToChristmas ) &amp;&amp;giftsLeftToBuy ) Panic ( ) ; / * When daysToChristmas equals zero,it evaluates to true with the bang prefix.Non-zero values of giftsLeftToBuy evaluate to true .
* /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RE:sig
It should be: If (!
(daysToChristmas)&amp;&amp;giftsLeftToBuy) Panic();/*When daysToChristmas equals zero,it evaluates to true with the bang prefix.Non-zero values of giftsLeftToBuy evaluate to true.
*/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533291</id>
	<title>Complete?</title>
	<author>ichthus</author>
	<datestamp>1246393320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, it's the most complete complete map.  But, is it completely complete?  Just checking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it 's the most complete complete map .
But , is it completely complete ?
Just checking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it's the most complete complete map.
But, is it completely complete?
Just checking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531973</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246388280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Oprah's ass, and do we really want to see that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Oprah 's ass , and do we really want to see that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Oprah's ass, and do we really want to see that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532109</id>
	<title>i'm glad they amalgamated the data</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246388700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it just wouldn't feel right if they consolidated or incorporated the data, or, heaven forbid, unified or merged the data</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it just would n't feel right if they consolidated or incorporated the data , or , heaven forbid , unified or merged the data</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it just wouldn't feel right if they consolidated or incorporated the data, or, heaven forbid, unified or merged the data</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28694381</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable domestic news coverage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247600400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please have some consideration! ABC, NBC, CNN, et al. can't get to this because they are still suffering from the trauma of several important celebrity deaths recently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please have some consideration !
ABC , NBC , CNN , et al .
ca n't get to this because they are still suffering from the trauma of several important celebrity deaths recently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please have some consideration!
ABC, NBC, CNN, et al.
can't get to this because they are still suffering from the trauma of several important celebrity deaths recently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28547125</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>AlHunt</author>
	<datestamp>1246478280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Anyone know last 1\% isn't mapped</p><p>It's in the shadow cast by Obama's ego.</p><p>I know, I know, some humorless turd will flamebait me for this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... oh, well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Anyone know last 1 \ % is n't mappedIt 's in the shadow cast by Obama 's ego.I know , I know , some humorless turd will flamebait me for this ... oh , well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Anyone know last 1\% isn't mappedIt's in the shadow cast by Obama's ego.I know, I know, some humorless turd will flamebait me for this ... oh, well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532031</id>
	<title>Seattle area is the 1\% not mapped</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1246388460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to image the earth you must have a cloudless day...they're still waiting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to image the earth you must have a cloudless day...they 're still waiting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to image the earth you must have a cloudless day...they're still waiting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534173</id>
	<title>Re:Most Complete Topographical Map of Earth Comple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246353780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No. But 'complete map most complete' is. As you have almost intuited, the summary headline is free of meaning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
But 'complete map most complete ' is .
As you have almost intuited , the summary headline is free of meaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
But 'complete map most complete' is.
As you have almost intuited, the summary headline is free of meaning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28539663</id>
	<title>Flight Sim</title>
	<author>Pravetz-82</author>
	<datestamp>1246439760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to see a flight simulator, which uses this data to simulate the whole world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to see a flight simulator , which uses this data to simulate the whole world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to see a flight simulator, which uses this data to simulate the whole world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532509</id>
	<title>This must be stopped!</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1246390080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A completely accurate topographical map of the whole Earth?  Including possible locations of military installations, elementary schools and donut shops?  That's madness!
</p><p>You know who would want this kind of information?  Terrorists, that's who.  If they figure out what the Earth looks like, they might blow it up!  Clearly this 'Japan' company is a front for free-lance international terrorists like Hans Gruber, and they must be stopped.
</p><p>Keep this dangerous terrorist tool off the market before the children are hurt by it!  Pass new laws restricting access to this kind of sensitive topographical information.  Make it a crime to even talk about possessing a "map", even if it's of a fictional place.  Only then can we truly be safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A completely accurate topographical map of the whole Earth ?
Including possible locations of military installations , elementary schools and donut shops ?
That 's madness !
You know who would want this kind of information ?
Terrorists , that 's who .
If they figure out what the Earth looks like , they might blow it up !
Clearly this 'Japan ' company is a front for free-lance international terrorists like Hans Gruber , and they must be stopped .
Keep this dangerous terrorist tool off the market before the children are hurt by it !
Pass new laws restricting access to this kind of sensitive topographical information .
Make it a crime to even talk about possessing a " map " , even if it 's of a fictional place .
Only then can we truly be safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A completely accurate topographical map of the whole Earth?
Including possible locations of military installations, elementary schools and donut shops?
That's madness!
You know who would want this kind of information?
Terrorists, that's who.
If they figure out what the Earth looks like, they might blow it up!
Clearly this 'Japan' company is a front for free-lance international terrorists like Hans Gruber, and they must be stopped.
Keep this dangerous terrorist tool off the market before the children are hurt by it!
Pass new laws restricting access to this kind of sensitive topographical information.
Make it a crime to even talk about possessing a "map", even if it's of a fictional place.
Only then can we truly be safe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533839</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>ijakings</author>
	<datestamp>1246352400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats just Rand McNally. They were originally planning on mapping the area, but apparently the strange phenomenon that causes people to wear hats on their feet and hamburgers to eat people, also causes it to be unmappable by the equipment they were using.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats just Rand McNally .
They were originally planning on mapping the area , but apparently the strange phenomenon that causes people to wear hats on their feet and hamburgers to eat people , also causes it to be unmappable by the equipment they were using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats just Rand McNally.
They were originally planning on mapping the area, but apparently the strange phenomenon that causes people to wear hats on their feet and hamburgers to eat people, also causes it to be unmappable by the equipment they were using.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535549</id>
	<title>Not a problem on human time scales</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246360440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not really an issue with this type of data. Remember, the resolution is 30m. There is nothing geologic (that would show up in this type of data) that moves anywhere close to that on human time scales.</p><p>There IS data on movement such as those you list, showing real time (in geologic time anyway) movement of the crust due to tectonics, or other things. It's actually a pretty major field in geology, studying minute changes. InSAR and millimeter-accurate differential GPS are two techniques.</p><p>Relatively coarse DEM data like ASTER or SRTM is used for different applications where millimeter accuracy isn't necessary - i.e., most things<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Additionally, there is enough inaccuracy in the instrumentation used for DEM data like this that doing multiple passes will give you significantly different results - the error is measured in meters. Therefore, any small changes - and earthquakes, volcanoes, and tectonic movements are small changes in the big scheme of things - are completely irrelevant as they'll be averaged out anyway. It should be interesting to make a comparison to previous datasets, though, and I'm sure there are people working on that already.</p><p>Of course, I suppose you'd notice in this data if a huge volcanic explosion occurred, like when half of Mt. St. Helens blew off. However, that's exceedingly rare<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>IAAGGS (I am a geology grad student).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not really an issue with this type of data .
Remember , the resolution is 30m .
There is nothing geologic ( that would show up in this type of data ) that moves anywhere close to that on human time scales.There IS data on movement such as those you list , showing real time ( in geologic time anyway ) movement of the crust due to tectonics , or other things .
It 's actually a pretty major field in geology , studying minute changes .
InSAR and millimeter-accurate differential GPS are two techniques.Relatively coarse DEM data like ASTER or SRTM is used for different applications where millimeter accuracy is n't necessary - i.e. , most things : ) Additionally , there is enough inaccuracy in the instrumentation used for DEM data like this that doing multiple passes will give you significantly different results - the error is measured in meters .
Therefore , any small changes - and earthquakes , volcanoes , and tectonic movements are small changes in the big scheme of things - are completely irrelevant as they 'll be averaged out anyway .
It should be interesting to make a comparison to previous datasets , though , and I 'm sure there are people working on that already.Of course , I suppose you 'd notice in this data if a huge volcanic explosion occurred , like when half of Mt .
St. Helens blew off .
However , that 's exceedingly rare : ) IAAGGS ( I am a geology grad student ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not really an issue with this type of data.
Remember, the resolution is 30m.
There is nothing geologic (that would show up in this type of data) that moves anywhere close to that on human time scales.There IS data on movement such as those you list, showing real time (in geologic time anyway) movement of the crust due to tectonics, or other things.
It's actually a pretty major field in geology, studying minute changes.
InSAR and millimeter-accurate differential GPS are two techniques.Relatively coarse DEM data like ASTER or SRTM is used for different applications where millimeter accuracy isn't necessary - i.e., most things :)Additionally, there is enough inaccuracy in the instrumentation used for DEM data like this that doing multiple passes will give you significantly different results - the error is measured in meters.
Therefore, any small changes - and earthquakes, volcanoes, and tectonic movements are small changes in the big scheme of things - are completely irrelevant as they'll be averaged out anyway.
It should be interesting to make a comparison to previous datasets, though, and I'm sure there are people working on that already.Of course, I suppose you'd notice in this data if a huge volcanic explosion occurred, like when half of Mt.
St. Helens blew off.
However, that's exceedingly rare :)IAAGGS (I am a geology grad student).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535759</id>
	<title>Re:Remarkable domestic news coverage</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1246361580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, this is a US site and it ahs the story.</p><p>My local news cast had the story. Granted it wasn't first page, but I wouldn't expect it to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , this is a US site and it ahs the story.My local news cast had the story .
Granted it was n't first page , but I would n't expect it to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, this is a US site and it ahs the story.My local news cast had the story.
Granted it wasn't first page, but I wouldn't expect it to be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532897</id>
	<title>Not so great</title>
	<author>xav\_jones</author>
	<datestamp>1246391520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, 70\% of the surface is trivially described as smooth and blue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , 70 \ % of the surface is trivially described as smooth and blue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, 70\% of the surface is trivially described as smooth and blue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538217</id>
	<title>Re:Hiking, etc...</title>
	<author>Biogenesis</author>
	<datestamp>1246378920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You may want to check out some of the work done by OpenStreetMap, especially the <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.9&amp;lon=-100.3&amp;zoom=4&amp;layers=00B0FTF" title="openstreetmap.org">Cycle Map</a> [openstreetmap.org] layer. The OSM data can be <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM\_Map\_On\_Garmin" title="openstreetmap.org">loaded onto a Garmin GPS</a> [openstreetmap.org]. <br> <br>From there you can add topographic layers from other sources. No doubt there's somebody who's made Garmin img files for the US based on SRTM and it's only a matter of time before this higher resolution data is incorporated. I'm Australian so I only know of the Australian sources off hand.<br> <br>

Also, as is the nature of OSM, if you find a trail which isn't marked you're welcome to draw it in and help out other users of the maps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may want to check out some of the work done by OpenStreetMap , especially the Cycle Map [ openstreetmap.org ] layer .
The OSM data can be loaded onto a Garmin GPS [ openstreetmap.org ] .
From there you can add topographic layers from other sources .
No doubt there 's somebody who 's made Garmin img files for the US based on SRTM and it 's only a matter of time before this higher resolution data is incorporated .
I 'm Australian so I only know of the Australian sources off hand .
Also , as is the nature of OSM , if you find a trail which is n't marked you 're welcome to draw it in and help out other users of the maps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may want to check out some of the work done by OpenStreetMap, especially the Cycle Map [openstreetmap.org] layer.
The OSM data can be loaded onto a Garmin GPS [openstreetmap.org].
From there you can add topographic layers from other sources.
No doubt there's somebody who's made Garmin img files for the US based on SRTM and it's only a matter of time before this higher resolution data is incorporated.
I'm Australian so I only know of the Australian sources off hand.
Also, as is the nature of OSM, if you find a trail which isn't marked you're welcome to draw it in and help out other users of the maps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</id>
	<title>Free? How do they do the math?</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1246385880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"...Apparently, the data will be free to download and use."</p></div><p>How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use? A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...Apparently , the data will be free to download and use .
" How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use ?
A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...Apparently, the data will be free to download and use.
"How do these folks break even if the data will be free to download and use?
A small nominal charge for use or download would not hurt for sure...or would it?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532995</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246391940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Paradox?  Is that why doctors always have a private practice, OR they have three or more partners?  A pair would cause the universe to implode?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Paradox ?
Is that why doctors always have a private practice , OR they have three or more partners ?
A pair would cause the universe to implode ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paradox?
Is that why doctors always have a private practice, OR they have three or more partners?
A pair would cause the universe to implode?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531413</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1246386420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may be top-secret areas (e.g. military installations). It would not be unheard of to institute those restrictions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be top-secret areas ( e.g .
military installations ) .
It would not be unheard of to institute those restrictions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be top-secret areas (e.g.
military installations).
It would not be unheard of to institute those restrictions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532073</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>MadCow42</author>
	<datestamp>1246388640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you simply look at the image, it seems like a few random streaks in the image file.  I'd guess systems issues / data corruption, or other collection faults before I'd guess super-secret military bases.</p><p>Ideally they would combine this with previous data (relatively adjusted to this baseline) to fill in the gaps.</p><p>MadCow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you simply look at the image , it seems like a few random streaks in the image file .
I 'd guess systems issues / data corruption , or other collection faults before I 'd guess super-secret military bases.Ideally they would combine this with previous data ( relatively adjusted to this baseline ) to fill in the gaps.MadCow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you simply look at the image, it seems like a few random streaks in the image file.
I'd guess systems issues / data corruption, or other collection faults before I'd guess super-secret military bases.Ideally they would combine this with previous data (relatively adjusted to this baseline) to fill in the gaps.MadCow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534621</id>
	<title>Re:Technically free, but not in practice</title>
	<author>pjt33</author>
	<datestamp>1246355640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA may not charge you, but my quick calculation is that we're talking about 1,7 terabytes (uncompressed - it will compress fairly well, but probably still half a terabyte to download) so it's not going to be free to get the whole lot. OTOH if they set up a suitable server then NASA's very own free open-source WorldWind software will allow you to view it, and if you know C# or Java you can write your own filters to false-colour it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA may not charge you , but my quick calculation is that we 're talking about 1,7 terabytes ( uncompressed - it will compress fairly well , but probably still half a terabyte to download ) so it 's not going to be free to get the whole lot .
OTOH if they set up a suitable server then NASA 's very own free open-source WorldWind software will allow you to view it , and if you know C # or Java you can write your own filters to false-colour it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA may not charge you, but my quick calculation is that we're talking about 1,7 terabytes (uncompressed - it will compress fairly well, but probably still half a terabyte to download) so it's not going to be free to get the whole lot.
OTOH if they set up a suitable server then NASA's very own free open-source WorldWind software will allow you to view it, and if you know C# or Java you can write your own filters to false-colour it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531703</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>click2005</author>
	<datestamp>1246387320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 km</i></p><p>It could be 40075.02km long and 127.28km wide.</p><p>In fact I'm guessing its the part of the earth covered by the big red stripe that marks the equator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 \ % would be 5.100.720 km , which is 2258x2258 kmIt could be 40075.02km long and 127.28km wide.In fact I 'm guessing its the part of the earth covered by the big red stripe that marks the equator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1\% would be 5.100.720 km, which is 2258x2258 kmIt could be 40075.02km long and 127.28km wide.In fact I'm guessing its the part of the earth covered by the big red stripe that marks the equator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534865</id>
	<title>Free is important - think of the grad students!</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1246356780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am actually using this data for my thesis project in geology. Actually, I'm really excited to learn about this, as the previously available 90m resolution SRTM data isn't really sufficient for my needs.</p><p>The SRTM data is all free to download, if you can figure out their poor interface for selecting the files you need. If it wasn't, there would be a lot fewer people working with it. It is the most important data for the analyses I'm doing, and without it my thesis would be a lot different (you can do similar things with regular topographic maps, but essentially only by making hand measurements). I'm really glad that I haven't done a ton of analyses using the SRTM data - now I will wait until I can get my hands on the new stuff.</p><p>For a grad student like me with little to no funding for my research and a tiny paycheck from working as a TA, even a nominal fee to download is prohibitive. Even for someone that DOES have funding, paying for stuff like this is extremely annoying. Despite what journal publishers want you to think, science is about openness and sharing of information. Most scientists freely share their data and work with others - even those that work with proprietary data in industry, if you ask them nicely.</p><p>And as others have noted - we already paid for it. It's produced by the government.</p><p>Now, here's the best part - there is actually 30m data from the SRTM mission. However, except for North America, only the 90m data is available, because it's restricted - not by NASA, but by the DOD. So with this new data they've apparently side-stepped the DOD. NASA and the USGS do seem like they want to get their data out their and accessible by scientists, despite what the DOD may want. I am working on Thailand, so the 30m SRTM data was restricted, but now I should be able to get this new data at the same resolution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am actually using this data for my thesis project in geology .
Actually , I 'm really excited to learn about this , as the previously available 90m resolution SRTM data is n't really sufficient for my needs.The SRTM data is all free to download , if you can figure out their poor interface for selecting the files you need .
If it was n't , there would be a lot fewer people working with it .
It is the most important data for the analyses I 'm doing , and without it my thesis would be a lot different ( you can do similar things with regular topographic maps , but essentially only by making hand measurements ) .
I 'm really glad that I have n't done a ton of analyses using the SRTM data - now I will wait until I can get my hands on the new stuff.For a grad student like me with little to no funding for my research and a tiny paycheck from working as a TA , even a nominal fee to download is prohibitive .
Even for someone that DOES have funding , paying for stuff like this is extremely annoying .
Despite what journal publishers want you to think , science is about openness and sharing of information .
Most scientists freely share their data and work with others - even those that work with proprietary data in industry , if you ask them nicely.And as others have noted - we already paid for it .
It 's produced by the government.Now , here 's the best part - there is actually 30m data from the SRTM mission .
However , except for North America , only the 90m data is available , because it 's restricted - not by NASA , but by the DOD .
So with this new data they 've apparently side-stepped the DOD .
NASA and the USGS do seem like they want to get their data out their and accessible by scientists , despite what the DOD may want .
I am working on Thailand , so the 30m SRTM data was restricted , but now I should be able to get this new data at the same resolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am actually using this data for my thesis project in geology.
Actually, I'm really excited to learn about this, as the previously available 90m resolution SRTM data isn't really sufficient for my needs.The SRTM data is all free to download, if you can figure out their poor interface for selecting the files you need.
If it wasn't, there would be a lot fewer people working with it.
It is the most important data for the analyses I'm doing, and without it my thesis would be a lot different (you can do similar things with regular topographic maps, but essentially only by making hand measurements).
I'm really glad that I haven't done a ton of analyses using the SRTM data - now I will wait until I can get my hands on the new stuff.For a grad student like me with little to no funding for my research and a tiny paycheck from working as a TA, even a nominal fee to download is prohibitive.
Even for someone that DOES have funding, paying for stuff like this is extremely annoying.
Despite what journal publishers want you to think, science is about openness and sharing of information.
Most scientists freely share their data and work with others - even those that work with proprietary data in industry, if you ask them nicely.And as others have noted - we already paid for it.
It's produced by the government.Now, here's the best part - there is actually 30m data from the SRTM mission.
However, except for North America, only the 90m data is available, because it's restricted - not by NASA, but by the DOD.
So with this new data they've apparently side-stepped the DOD.
NASA and the USGS do seem like they want to get their data out their and accessible by scientists, despite what the DOD may want.
I am working on Thailand, so the 30m SRTM data was restricted, but now I should be able to get this new data at the same resolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534023</id>
	<title>Re:The other \%1?</title>
	<author>WED Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1246353240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hey, this is a free country. Who is this Orbital Inclination that isn't allowing me to map what I want to map. Free speech, free speech, free beer, free. se...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination did n't allow to be mapped.Hey , this is a free country .
Who is this Orbital Inclination that is n't allowing me to map what I want to map .
Free speech , free speech , free beer , free .
se.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably the portion of the poles that the orbital inclination didn't allow to be mapped.Hey, this is a free country.
Who is this Orbital Inclination that isn't allowing me to map what I want to map.
Free speech, free speech, free beer, free.
se...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535593
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535759
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531413
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28541919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28544621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28694381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28542349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28547125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28546995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28575501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28700031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28536891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534865
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28688617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1650208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532073
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28575501
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28541919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532415
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28688617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531415
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532305
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538241
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531703
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531309
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531413
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28547125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28546995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28694381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28544621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532815
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28700031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532897
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28534865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28532747
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28535549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28531831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1650208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28533827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28542349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28536891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1650208.28538217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
