<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_30_1233213</id>
	<title>Pirate Bay Announces Sale to Swedish Company For $7.8 Million</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246366560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>paulraps writes <i>"<a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20364/20090630/">The Pirate Bay is to be bought for $7.8 million</a> by <a href="http://www.globalgamingfactory.com/">Global Gaming Factory X</a>, a Swedish company specializing in internet caf&#233; management software, the company has announced. As well as taking over the controversial brand, GGF has also bought Peerialism, a small IT company with roots at Sweden's Royal Institute of Technology, which has developed a new file sharing technology. The acquisitions mean that GGF will be at the heart of 'the international digital distribution market,' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing."</i> Reader pyzondar adds <i>"However, the press statement also states that the deal will only go through 'if GGF and its Board of Directors <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/global-gaming-factory-x-acquisitions-of-the-pirate-bay-and-new-file-sharing-technology-p2p-20">can use the asset in a legal and appropriate way</a>.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>paulraps writes " The Pirate Bay is to be bought for $ 7.8 million by Global Gaming Factory X , a Swedish company specializing in internet caf   management software , the company has announced .
As well as taking over the controversial brand , GGF has also bought Peerialism , a small IT company with roots at Sweden 's Royal Institute of Technology , which has developed a new file sharing technology .
The acquisitions mean that GGF will be at the heart of 'the international digital distribution market, ' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing .
" Reader pyzondar adds " However , the press statement also states that the deal will only go through 'if GGF and its Board of Directors can use the asset in a legal and appropriate way .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>paulraps writes "The Pirate Bay is to be bought for $7.8 million by Global Gaming Factory X, a Swedish company specializing in internet café management software, the company has announced.
As well as taking over the controversial brand, GGF has also bought Peerialism, a small IT company with roots at Sweden's Royal Institute of Technology, which has developed a new file sharing technology.
The acquisitions mean that GGF will be at the heart of 'the international digital distribution market,' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing.
" Reader pyzondar adds "However, the press statement also states that the deal will only go through 'if GGF and its Board of Directors can use the asset in a legal and appropriate way.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533875</id>
	<title>Re:End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246352580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funnily, BitTorrent was <em>more</em> centralized than Gnutella for example. It was more like a eDonkey network with no central server list, no cross-server-queries, and no search functionality at all. But with stupid files that you have to download and then use to download the actual content, instead of simple ed2k:// or magnet:// links.<br>Oh, and the BitTorrent "network" never had those rare files. Like the white-label vinyl of some exceptionally good bootleg that only existed seven times in the entire world.<br>Luckily, mlDonkey allows BitTorrent, <em>plus</em> half a dozen other networks, including eDonkey.</p><p>I always thought that it was a big step backwards.<br>I hope that the Gnutella(1/2) and/or eDonkey nets get more successful again, or replaced by something more safe that still can reach a good performance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funnily , BitTorrent was more centralized than Gnutella for example .
It was more like a eDonkey network with no central server list , no cross-server-queries , and no search functionality at all .
But with stupid files that you have to download and then use to download the actual content , instead of simple ed2k : // or magnet : // links.Oh , and the BitTorrent " network " never had those rare files .
Like the white-label vinyl of some exceptionally good bootleg that only existed seven times in the entire world.Luckily , mlDonkey allows BitTorrent , plus half a dozen other networks , including eDonkey.I always thought that it was a big step backwards.I hope that the Gnutella ( 1/2 ) and/or eDonkey nets get more successful again , or replaced by something more safe that still can reach a good performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funnily, BitTorrent was more centralized than Gnutella for example.
It was more like a eDonkey network with no central server list, no cross-server-queries, and no search functionality at all.
But with stupid files that you have to download and then use to download the actual content, instead of simple ed2k:// or magnet:// links.Oh, and the BitTorrent "network" never had those rare files.
Like the white-label vinyl of some exceptionally good bootleg that only existed seven times in the entire world.Luckily, mlDonkey allows BitTorrent, plus half a dozen other networks, including eDonkey.I always thought that it was a big step backwards.I hope that the Gnutella(1/2) and/or eDonkey nets get more successful again, or replaced by something more safe that still can reach a good performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527511</id>
	<title>Re:End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246373100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem being, in this case, "something less centralized" is sort of in the range of spitting out single<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.torrent files from random websites, only findable through Google (if that).  Which will annoy people to the point where they will want something MORE centralized, and the function oscillates at this point.</p><p>Unless by "something less centralized" you mean we revert to providing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.torrent files on the street in real life or something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem being , in this case , " something less centralized " is sort of in the range of spitting out single .torrent files from random websites , only findable through Google ( if that ) .
Which will annoy people to the point where they will want something MORE centralized , and the function oscillates at this point.Unless by " something less centralized " you mean we revert to providing .torrent files on the street in real life or something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem being, in this case, "something less centralized" is sort of in the range of spitting out single .torrent files from random websites, only findable through Google (if that).
Which will annoy people to the point where they will want something MORE centralized, and the function oscillates at this point.Unless by "something less centralized" you mean we revert to providing .torrent files on the street in real life or something like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533279</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246393260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To clarify a bit..</p><p>TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners. The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong, the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.</p><p>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents. This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.</p><p>The 3d party company services will have APIs, so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds. remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead? well that goes for torrents and TPB to.</p><p>All in all, this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.</p><p>And dont worry, not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB, not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To clarify a bit..TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners .
The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong , the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.Now , the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track , just that they connect peers , and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents .
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The 3d party company services will have APIs , so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds .
remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead ?
well that goes for torrents and TPB to.All in all , this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.And dont worry , not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff .
/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB , not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To clarify a bit..TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners.
The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong, the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The 3d party company services will have APIs, so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds.
remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead?
well that goes for torrents and TPB to.All in all, this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.And dont worry, not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff.
/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB, not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533409</id>
	<title>New Pirate Bay Logo</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1246393800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gadgetking.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ThePirateBay2.jpg" title="gadgetking.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gadgetking.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ThePirateBay2.jpg</a> [gadgetking.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.gadgetking.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ThePirateBay2.jpg [ gadgetking.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.gadgetking.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ThePirateBay2.jpg [gadgetking.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529219</id>
	<title>Re:TPB blog</title>
	<author>Anarchduke</author>
	<datestamp>1246380180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course they aren't worried, they just sold a website for 7.8 Million.  I wouldn't be worried with close to 8 million dollars, would you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course they are n't worried , they just sold a website for 7.8 Million .
I would n't be worried with close to 8 million dollars , would you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course they aren't worried, they just sold a website for 7.8 Million.
I wouldn't be worried with close to 8 million dollars, would you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526955</id>
	<title>Sad.</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1246370580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very, very, very sad. So what do you think the next step will be? Turning TPB into a CDN? Using advertising revenue to pay for files shared? What are your thoughts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very , very , very sad .
So what do you think the next step will be ?
Turning TPB into a CDN ?
Using advertising revenue to pay for files shared ?
What are your thoughts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very, very, very sad.
So what do you think the next step will be?
Turning TPB into a CDN?
Using advertising revenue to pay for files shared?
What are your thoughts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527711</id>
	<title>Re:Sad.</title>
	<author>Miros</author>
	<datestamp>1246374000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel like CDNs are almost a dime a dozen at this point, and are typically structured very differently from the way TPB is.  I dunno, I feel like this may have been a bad investment for someone, with things like shows on YouTube, Boxee, Hulu, Amazon.COM on-demand, netflix watch instantly, etc, the peer to peer ship may have begun to sail at this point.  Not saying it wont still be huge, but when I think of my average non-tech savvy friends, many of them have stopped using torrents all together and have not looked back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel like CDNs are almost a dime a dozen at this point , and are typically structured very differently from the way TPB is .
I dunno , I feel like this may have been a bad investment for someone , with things like shows on YouTube , Boxee , Hulu , Amazon.COM on-demand , netflix watch instantly , etc , the peer to peer ship may have begun to sail at this point .
Not saying it wont still be huge , but when I think of my average non-tech savvy friends , many of them have stopped using torrents all together and have not looked back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel like CDNs are almost a dime a dozen at this point, and are typically structured very differently from the way TPB is.
I dunno, I feel like this may have been a bad investment for someone, with things like shows on YouTube, Boxee, Hulu, Amazon.COM on-demand, netflix watch instantly, etc, the peer to peer ship may have begun to sail at this point.
Not saying it wont still be huge, but when I think of my average non-tech savvy friends, many of them have stopped using torrents all together and have not looked back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528191</id>
	<title>What no court can kill, a business will</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1246376220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The courts could have fought for another decade without denting TPB, but this news is a eulogy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The courts could have fought for another decade without denting TPB , but this news is a eulogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The courts could have fought for another decade without denting TPB, but this news is a eulogy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528031</id>
	<title>Re:Pirate Bay down?</title>
	<author>Zelaron</author>
	<datestamp>1246375620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weird. It doesn't work here either (I'm in Sweden). <a href="http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/thepiratebay.org" title="downforeve...justme.com" rel="nofollow">http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/thepiratebay.org</a> [downforeve...justme.com] reports that it's currently up though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weird .
It does n't work here either ( I 'm in Sweden ) .
http : //downforeveryoneorjustme.com/thepiratebay.org [ downforeve...justme.com ] reports that it 's currently up though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weird.
It doesn't work here either (I'm in Sweden).
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/thepiratebay.org [downforeve...justme.com] reports that it's currently up though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969</id>
	<title>Goodbye TPB</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt; 'the international digital distribution market,' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing."<br><br>So, it'll be Napster 2. Big corp buys out great service for the tech alone and uses it to further corporate greed.<br><br>And here we were thinking the TPB founders were selfless Jedi helping file sharers and making the digital world a better place for all. They SOLD OUT!!!<br><br>TPB was nice while it lasted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; 'the international digital distribution market, ' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing .
" So , it 'll be Napster 2 .
Big corp buys out great service for the tech alone and uses it to further corporate greed.And here we were thinking the TPB founders were selfless Jedi helping file sharers and making the digital world a better place for all .
They SOLD OUT ! !
! TPB was nice while it lasted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; 'the international digital distribution market,' allowing it to introduce a new pay model for file sharing.
"So, it'll be Napster 2.
Big corp buys out great service for the tech alone and uses it to further corporate greed.And here we were thinking the TPB founders were selfless Jedi helping file sharers and making the digital world a better place for all.
They SOLD OUT!!
!TPB was nice while it lasted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527173</id>
	<title>Napster?</title>
	<author>cyberjock1980</author>
	<datestamp>1246371600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is TPB going the way of the Napster?  Buy them out and try to turn them into some legitimate website?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is TPB going the way of the Napster ?
Buy them out and try to turn them into some legitimate website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is TPB going the way of the Napster?
Buy them out and try to turn them into some legitimate website?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941</id>
	<title>No profits made?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So much for operating thepiratebay.com at no profit.  That sounds like a sizable profit to me, even after the $3.6M in damages awarded.  There is still the issue of the 1-year prison sentence for each of the four operators...but each will walk away from prison with about $1,050,000 after all is said and done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So much for operating thepiratebay.com at no profit .
That sounds like a sizable profit to me , even after the $ 3.6M in damages awarded .
There is still the issue of the 1-year prison sentence for each of the four operators...but each will walk away from prison with about $ 1,050,000 after all is said and done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So much for operating thepiratebay.com at no profit.
That sounds like a sizable profit to me, even after the $3.6M in damages awarded.
There is still the issue of the 1-year prison sentence for each of the four operators...but each will walk away from prison with about $1,050,000 after all is said and done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529349</id>
	<title>Re:Worrying news on Pandeya just incoming now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and please don't forget that Realtid.se is a tabloid (with financial focus, but still a tabloid).<br>So take that Google translation with a bucket of salt!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and please do n't forget that Realtid.se is a tabloid ( with financial focus , but still a tabloid ) .So take that Google translation with a bucket of salt !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and please don't forget that Realtid.se is a tabloid (with financial focus, but still a tabloid).So take that Google translation with a bucket of salt!
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527987</id>
	<title>Re:Worrying news on Pandeya just incoming now</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1246375500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only thing I managed to take away from that article is the guy buying it has sharp elbows and teeth.</p><p>This sounds like it could be very beneficial if it ever comes down to hand to hand combat against the music industry.</p><p>Oh and I think there was something about not eating Danish people with seaweed or something too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing I managed to take away from that article is the guy buying it has sharp elbows and teeth.This sounds like it could be very beneficial if it ever comes down to hand to hand combat against the music industry.Oh and I think there was something about not eating Danish people with seaweed or something too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing I managed to take away from that article is the guy buying it has sharp elbows and teeth.This sounds like it could be very beneficial if it ever comes down to hand to hand combat against the music industry.Oh and I think there was something about not eating Danish people with seaweed or something too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527203</id>
	<title>They should've checked bittorrent</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1246371720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a waste of money.  You can download TPB from bittorrent or any p2p share for free!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a waste of money .
You can download TPB from bittorrent or any p2p share for free !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a waste of money.
You can download TPB from bittorrent or any p2p share for free!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895</id>
	<title>Sold out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like supernova before em. Well that's the end of that..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like supernova before em .
Well that 's the end of that. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like supernova before em.
Well that's the end of that..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530473</id>
	<title>Re:Worrying news on Pandeya just incoming now</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1246383960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed."</p><p>WTF??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed. " WTF ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed."WTF?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528489</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246377360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would recommend reading their blog-entry about it...</p><p>here: http://thepiratebay.org/blog/164</p><p>-Deepone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would recommend reading their blog-entry about it...here : http : //thepiratebay.org/blog/164-Deepone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would recommend reading their blog-entry about it...here: http://thepiratebay.org/blog/164-Deepone</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529057</id>
	<title>Pirate Bay BACK UP! With a message.</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1246379520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TPB might change owner<br>

Yes, it's true.<br>

News reached the press today in Sweden - The Pirate Bay might get aquired by Global Gaming Factory X AB.<br>

A lot of people are worried. We're not and you shouldn't be either!<br>

TPB is being sold for a great bit underneath it's value if the money would be the interesting part. It's not. The interesting thing is that the right people with the right attitude and possibilities keep running the site.
As all of you know, there's not been much news on the site for the past two-three years. It's the same site essentially. On the internets, stuff dies if it doesn't evolve. We don't want that to happen.

We've been working on this project for many years. It's time to invite more people into the project, in a way that is secure and safe for everybody. We need that, or the site will die. And letting TPB die is the last thing that is allowed to happen!

If the new owners will screw around with the site, nobody will keep using it. That's the biggest insurance one can have that the site will be run in the way that we all want to. And - you can now not only share files but shares with people. Everybody can indeed be the owner of The Pirate Bay now. That's awesome and will take the heat of us.

The old crew is still around in different ways. We will also not stop being active in the politics of the internets - quite the opposite. Now we're fueling up for going into the next gear. TPB will have economical muscles to let people evolve it. It will team up with great technicians to evolve the protocols. And we, the people interested in more than just technology, will have the time to focus on that. It's win-win-win.

The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets. I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all. Don't worry - be happy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>TPB might change owner Yes , it 's true .
News reached the press today in Sweden - The Pirate Bay might get aquired by Global Gaming Factory X AB .
A lot of people are worried .
We 're not and you should n't be either !
TPB is being sold for a great bit underneath it 's value if the money would be the interesting part .
It 's not .
The interesting thing is that the right people with the right attitude and possibilities keep running the site .
As all of you know , there 's not been much news on the site for the past two-three years .
It 's the same site essentially .
On the internets , stuff dies if it does n't evolve .
We do n't want that to happen .
We 've been working on this project for many years .
It 's time to invite more people into the project , in a way that is secure and safe for everybody .
We need that , or the site will die .
And letting TPB die is the last thing that is allowed to happen !
If the new owners will screw around with the site , nobody will keep using it .
That 's the biggest insurance one can have that the site will be run in the way that we all want to .
And - you can now not only share files but shares with people .
Everybody can indeed be the owner of The Pirate Bay now .
That 's awesome and will take the heat of us .
The old crew is still around in different ways .
We will also not stop being active in the politics of the internets - quite the opposite .
Now we 're fueling up for going into the next gear .
TPB will have economical muscles to let people evolve it .
It will team up with great technicians to evolve the protocols .
And we , the people interested in more than just technology , will have the time to focus on that .
It 's win-win-win .
The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech , freedom of information and the openess of the nets .
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all .
Do n't worry - be happy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TPB might change owner

Yes, it's true.
News reached the press today in Sweden - The Pirate Bay might get aquired by Global Gaming Factory X AB.
A lot of people are worried.
We're not and you shouldn't be either!
TPB is being sold for a great bit underneath it's value if the money would be the interesting part.
It's not.
The interesting thing is that the right people with the right attitude and possibilities keep running the site.
As all of you know, there's not been much news on the site for the past two-three years.
It's the same site essentially.
On the internets, stuff dies if it doesn't evolve.
We don't want that to happen.
We've been working on this project for many years.
It's time to invite more people into the project, in a way that is secure and safe for everybody.
We need that, or the site will die.
And letting TPB die is the last thing that is allowed to happen!
If the new owners will screw around with the site, nobody will keep using it.
That's the biggest insurance one can have that the site will be run in the way that we all want to.
And - you can now not only share files but shares with people.
Everybody can indeed be the owner of The Pirate Bay now.
That's awesome and will take the heat of us.
The old crew is still around in different ways.
We will also not stop being active in the politics of the internets - quite the opposite.
Now we're fueling up for going into the next gear.
TPB will have economical muscles to let people evolve it.
It will team up with great technicians to evolve the protocols.
And we, the people interested in more than just technology, will have the time to focus on that.
It's win-win-win.
The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets.
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all.
Don't worry - be happy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529557</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, my kingdom for a "-1, Whiny drama queen" mod...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , my kingdom for a " -1 , Whiny drama queen " mod.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, my kingdom for a "-1, Whiny drama queen" mod...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527743</id>
	<title>Not Happening, If You Ask Me</title>
	<author>lacoronus</author>
	<datestamp>1246374240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the press release:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Completion of the acquisitions are primarily subject to GGF obtaining financing for the acquisition</p></div><p>So to summarize: they're buying a company with unknown business model and unknown future legal status, for money they don't have.</p><p>I don't see that working out. Usually you at least make sure the seller has something to sell, and the buyer has the ability to buy, before you announce a sale. This is just fantasy so far.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the press release : Completion of the acquisitions are primarily subject to GGF obtaining financing for the acquisitionSo to summarize : they 're buying a company with unknown business model and unknown future legal status , for money they do n't have.I do n't see that working out .
Usually you at least make sure the seller has something to sell , and the buyer has the ability to buy , before you announce a sale .
This is just fantasy so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the press release:Completion of the acquisitions are primarily subject to GGF obtaining financing for the acquisitionSo to summarize: they're buying a company with unknown business model and unknown future legal status, for money they don't have.I don't see that working out.
Usually you at least make sure the seller has something to sell, and the buyer has the ability to buy, before you announce a sale.
This is just fantasy so far.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528645</id>
	<title>Anyone wants to guess which record giant</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1246377900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>bankrolled this on the back end? Seems like a pretty well played out end game - PB crew gets rolled in court by a judge working for the record companies, then this miraculous offer comes out that will cover their legal expenses and give them a little extra something-something for themselves, plus a chance to safe face with that little charity speech, and everyone ends up happy minus all their disposable fan base. I guess the record companies realized that once someone gets elected into politics they get a price tag<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Well played indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bankrolled this on the back end ?
Seems like a pretty well played out end game - PB crew gets rolled in court by a judge working for the record companies , then this miraculous offer comes out that will cover their legal expenses and give them a little extra something-something for themselves , plus a chance to safe face with that little charity speech , and everyone ends up happy minus all their disposable fan base .
I guess the record companies realized that once someone gets elected into politics they get a price tag : ) Well played indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bankrolled this on the back end?
Seems like a pretty well played out end game - PB crew gets rolled in court by a judge working for the record companies, then this miraculous offer comes out that will cover their legal expenses and give them a little extra something-something for themselves, plus a chance to safe face with that little charity speech, and everyone ends up happy minus all their disposable fan base.
I guess the record companies realized that once someone gets elected into politics they get a price tag :) Well played indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528569</id>
	<title>Re:End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1246377600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It's Napster all over again...</p></div><p>It is reminiscent yes, but with Napster it was possible to keep the name and logo intact because neither of them overtly suggested that copyright infringement was the way to go other than the formative history of the brand, which fades as people move on. However, this case is different. How are they going to operate "The Pirate Bay", which has a pirate ship logo and cassette tape and crossed bones from the "home taping is killing the music business" campaign, without the perpetually reminding people of the pirate connection?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It 's Napster all over again...It is reminiscent yes , but with Napster it was possible to keep the name and logo intact because neither of them overtly suggested that copyright infringement was the way to go other than the formative history of the brand , which fades as people move on .
However , this case is different .
How are they going to operate " The Pirate Bay " , which has a pirate ship logo and cassette tape and crossed bones from the " home taping is killing the music business " campaign , without the perpetually reminding people of the pirate connection ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It's Napster all over again...It is reminiscent yes, but with Napster it was possible to keep the name and logo intact because neither of them overtly suggested that copyright infringement was the way to go other than the formative history of the brand, which fades as people move on.
However, this case is different.
How are they going to operate "The Pirate Bay", which has a pirate ship logo and cassette tape and crossed bones from the "home taping is killing the music business" campaign, without the perpetually reminding people of the pirate connection?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527855</id>
	<title>Re:Goodbye TPB</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246374840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supply and demand will win, don't worry.</p><p>The demand for filesharing is still there. Why would it go away? Someone will step up and offer the supply. Maybe as torrents, maybe as something else, we'll see. For a time we'll have a few trackers and a few competing systems, then a new de facto standard will emerge which we will use, they will eventually be selling out, and the whole game starts anew.</p><p>Why do you think it should be different this time compared to Napster's sold&amp;folded?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supply and demand will win , do n't worry.The demand for filesharing is still there .
Why would it go away ?
Someone will step up and offer the supply .
Maybe as torrents , maybe as something else , we 'll see .
For a time we 'll have a few trackers and a few competing systems , then a new de facto standard will emerge which we will use , they will eventually be selling out , and the whole game starts anew.Why do you think it should be different this time compared to Napster 's sold&amp;folded ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supply and demand will win, don't worry.The demand for filesharing is still there.
Why would it go away?
Someone will step up and offer the supply.
Maybe as torrents, maybe as something else, we'll see.
For a time we'll have a few trackers and a few competing systems, then a new de facto standard will emerge which we will use, they will eventually be selling out, and the whole game starts anew.Why do you think it should be different this time compared to Napster's sold&amp;folded?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533053</id>
	<title>Show me the money</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1246392240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>GGF obviously just wants TBP for it's user base. They're buying into all the site hits. I wonder how many of us will stop using the site if they do acquire it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>GGF obviously just wants TBP for it 's user base .
They 're buying into all the site hits .
I wonder how many of us will stop using the site if they do acquire it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GGF obviously just wants TBP for it's user base.
They're buying into all the site hits.
I wonder how many of us will stop using the site if they do acquire it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534053</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>pnewhook</author>
	<datestamp>1246353300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me.</p></div><p>Because I happen to be insightful.  Very insightful actually. So insightful in fact that it is way beyond your level of understanding.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me.Because I happen to be insightful .
Very insightful actually .
So insightful in fact that it is way beyond your level of understanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me.Because I happen to be insightful.
Very insightful actually.
So insightful in fact that it is way beyond your level of understanding.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527631</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>Ceiynt</author>
	<datestamp>1246373640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ya, just like Napster and Kazaa. Cash out on a good name, company turns it to trash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya , just like Napster and Kazaa .
Cash out on a good name , company turns it to trash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya, just like Napster and Kazaa.
Cash out on a good name, company turns it to trash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529267</id>
	<title>Re:The Piratebay is down</title>
	<author>mambodog</author>
	<datestamp>1246380360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Works for me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Works for me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Works for me...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532087</id>
	<title>Re:This is the end</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1246388640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't clear how this affects those found guilty in TPB's trial. Presumably they still plan to appeal to try and avoid jail, but if they loose anything they gain from this deal would go directly to the copyright holder's groups who sued them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't clear how this affects those found guilty in TPB 's trial .
Presumably they still plan to appeal to try and avoid jail , but if they loose anything they gain from this deal would go directly to the copyright holder 's groups who sued them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't clear how this affects those found guilty in TPB's trial.
Presumably they still plan to appeal to try and avoid jail, but if they loose anything they gain from this deal would go directly to the copyright holder's groups who sued them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533757</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246395360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the sale was accompanied by the worst PR handling <em>ever</em>!</p><p>If they had told what you said, it would continue to be a success.</p><p>Unfortunately, everyone now parrots the sale like you see it here. Which means, they will die, just as foretold by half the posts on this forum.</p><p>I don't know what to think about this. Maybe after some time, it will clarify.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the sale was accompanied by the worst PR handling ever ! If they had told what you said , it would continue to be a success.Unfortunately , everyone now parrots the sale like you see it here .
Which means , they will die , just as foretold by half the posts on this forum.I do n't know what to think about this .
Maybe after some time , it will clarify .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the sale was accompanied by the worst PR handling ever!If they had told what you said, it would continue to be a success.Unfortunately, everyone now parrots the sale like you see it here.
Which means, they will die, just as foretold by half the posts on this forum.I don't know what to think about this.
Maybe after some time, it will clarify.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529289</id>
	<title>Re:Worrying news on Pandeya just incoming now</title>
	<author>Anarchduke</author>
	<datestamp>1246380420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG Google translate can be funny sometimes<blockquote><div><p>What do you think of Pandeyas ethical and moral stance?<br>
He is completely exempt from the ethics and morals.<br>
I have never experienced anything similar.<br>
When I discuss with more experienced people than me, so baxnar the.<br>
You might need to be ready to walk over corpses to become millionaire?<br>
 I know many rich who have not. They have managed very well with mostly pretty cleaner.<br>
- Such as Hans Pandeya may not play with the big guns.<br>
- None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Not really sure what he is saying, but I find it humorous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG Google translate can be funny sometimesWhat do you think of Pandeyas ethical and moral stance ?
He is completely exempt from the ethics and morals .
I have never experienced anything similar .
When I discuss with more experienced people than me , so baxnar the .
You might need to be ready to walk over corpses to become millionaire ?
I know many rich who have not .
They have managed very well with mostly pretty cleaner .
- Such as Hans Pandeya may not play with the big guns .
- None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed .
Not really sure what he is saying , but I find it humorous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG Google translate can be funny sometimesWhat do you think of Pandeyas ethical and moral stance?
He is completely exempt from the ethics and morals.
I have never experienced anything similar.
When I discuss with more experienced people than me, so baxnar the.
You might need to be ready to walk over corpses to become millionaire?
I know many rich who have not.
They have managed very well with mostly pretty cleaner.
- Such as Hans Pandeya may not play with the big guns.
- None of the Wallenberg family to take him with seaweed.
Not really sure what he is saying, but I find it humorous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533847</id>
	<title>Brokep'sAnakata'sTiamo's ThePirateBay</title>
	<author>parazite.org</author>
	<datestamp>1246352460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid\_Meier's\_Pirates" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid\_Meier's\_Pirates</a> [wikipedia.org]!

Gameplay

Pirates! is a single-player game. The player receives a letter of marque authorizing service as a privateer for Spain, the Dutch Republic, England, or France in the Caribbean. The player's loyalties may change over the course of the game; he may also hold rank with multiple countries and may turn to piracy at any time. Gameplay is open-ended; the player may choose to attack enemy ships or towns, hunt pirates, seek buried treasure, rescue long-lost family members, or even avoid violence altogether and seek to increase his wealth through trade. The game also has no predetermined end, although as time goes on, it becomes more difficult to recruit crew members. Also, as the player character ages, fighting becomes more difficult, and deteriorating health will eventually force the character into retirement. The game ends when the player retires, at which point he is given a position in his future life, from beggar to King's advisor, based on accumulated wealth, land, rank, marital status, and other accomplishments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid \ _Meier 's \ _Pirates [ wikipedia.org ] !
Gameplay Pirates !
is a single-player game .
The player receives a letter of marque authorizing service as a privateer for Spain , the Dutch Republic , England , or France in the Caribbean .
The player 's loyalties may change over the course of the game ; he may also hold rank with multiple countries and may turn to piracy at any time .
Gameplay is open-ended ; the player may choose to attack enemy ships or towns , hunt pirates , seek buried treasure , rescue long-lost family members , or even avoid violence altogether and seek to increase his wealth through trade .
The game also has no predetermined end , although as time goes on , it becomes more difficult to recruit crew members .
Also , as the player character ages , fighting becomes more difficult , and deteriorating health will eventually force the character into retirement .
The game ends when the player retires , at which point he is given a position in his future life , from beggar to King 's advisor , based on accumulated wealth , land , rank , marital status , and other accomplishments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid\_Meier's\_Pirates [wikipedia.org]!
Gameplay

Pirates!
is a single-player game.
The player receives a letter of marque authorizing service as a privateer for Spain, the Dutch Republic, England, or France in the Caribbean.
The player's loyalties may change over the course of the game; he may also hold rank with multiple countries and may turn to piracy at any time.
Gameplay is open-ended; the player may choose to attack enemy ships or towns, hunt pirates, seek buried treasure, rescue long-lost family members, or even avoid violence altogether and seek to increase his wealth through trade.
The game also has no predetermined end, although as time goes on, it becomes more difficult to recruit crew members.
Also, as the player character ages, fighting becomes more difficult, and deteriorating health will eventually force the character into retirement.
The game ends when the player retires, at which point he is given a position in his future life, from beggar to King's advisor, based on accumulated wealth, land, rank, marital status, and other accomplishments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528211</id>
	<title>first things first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is my piratebay hoodie still cool to wear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is my piratebay hoodie still cool to wear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is my piratebay hoodie still cool to wear?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526915</id>
	<title>When the going gets tough...</title>
	<author>Caboosian</author>
	<datestamp>1246370340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The tough sell out. As would I. That fine's gotta get paid somehow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The tough sell out .
As would I. That fine 's got ta get paid somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tough sell out.
As would I. That fine's gotta get paid somehow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527761</id>
	<title>Re:No profits made?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246374360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A halfway decent judge for a copyright trial? Can you take a picture, I heard the National Inquirer pays well for such things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A halfway decent judge for a copyright trial ?
Can you take a picture , I heard the National Inquirer pays well for such things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A halfway decent judge for a copyright trial?
Can you take a picture, I heard the National Inquirer pays well for such things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531835</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1246387800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What was the scam, exactly? And were they "scamming" on behalf of the organizations they are donating all the money to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the scam , exactly ?
And were they " scamming " on behalf of the organizations they are donating all the money to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the scam, exactly?
And were they "scamming" on behalf of the organizations they are donating all the money to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529397</id>
	<title>Re:The Piratebay is down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's back up again</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's back up again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's back up again</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28535441</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>Stray7Xi</author>
	<datestamp>1246360020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.</p></div><p>Sounds like a distributed usenet model.  So you get your indexing from one company and that links to trackers run by another company.  One problem, the indexing company can run ads.  What does the tracker do to make money?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track , just that they connect peers , and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.Sounds like a distributed usenet model .
So you get your indexing from one company and that links to trackers run by another company .
One problem , the indexing company can run ads .
What does the tracker do to make money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.Sounds like a distributed usenet model.
So you get your indexing from one company and that links to trackers run by another company.
One problem, the indexing company can run ads.
What does the tracker do to make money?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528147</id>
	<title>So in other words..</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1246376040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..TPB is going the way of Napster?</htmltext>
<tokenext>..TPB is going the way of Napster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..TPB is going the way of Napster?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527601</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>Reality Master 101</author>
	<datestamp>1246373520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, please. They have ALWAYS been in it for the money, and they have ALWAYS been lying to you. Yeah, a huge site like that makes no money? Bullshit!

</p><p>They will keep this money, just like they kept the money from the running of the site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , please .
They have ALWAYS been in it for the money , and they have ALWAYS been lying to you .
Yeah , a huge site like that makes no money ?
Bullshit ! They will keep this money , just like they kept the money from the running of the site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, please.
They have ALWAYS been in it for the money, and they have ALWAYS been lying to you.
Yeah, a huge site like that makes no money?
Bullshit!

They will keep this money, just like they kept the money from the running of the site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526973</id>
	<title>This already worked so well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for Napster</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for Napster</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for Napster</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530823</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246384800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... get rich by giving the profits to a foundation dedicated to free-speech and democracy? I do however they get some monetary compensation for the ~5 years of labor they put in it but it wouldn't surprise me if they won't. Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... get rich by giving the profits to a foundation dedicated to free-speech and democracy ?
I do however they get some monetary compensation for the ~ 5 years of labor they put in it but it would n't surprise me if they wo n't .
Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... get rich by giving the profits to a foundation dedicated to free-speech and democracy?
I do however they get some monetary compensation for the ~5 years of labor they put in it but it wouldn't surprise me if they won't.
Why on earth you are modded insightful is beyond me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533439</id>
	<title>June 2009</title>
	<author>PPNSteve</author>
	<datestamp>1246394040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>June 2009 - to be remembered as the worst month ever:

First Ed McMahon dies, then Farrah Fawcett, which lead into Micheal Jackson and BILLY MAYS' death.. Now just before the end of the month we add The Pirate Bay to the list and you all have now witnessed the worst June in history.

I for one am not liking this. You shouldn't either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>June 2009 - to be remembered as the worst month ever : First Ed McMahon dies , then Farrah Fawcett , which lead into Micheal Jackson and BILLY MAYS ' death.. Now just before the end of the month we add The Pirate Bay to the list and you all have now witnessed the worst June in history .
I for one am not liking this .
You should n't either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>June 2009 - to be remembered as the worst month ever:

First Ed McMahon dies, then Farrah Fawcett, which lead into Micheal Jackson and BILLY MAYS' death.. Now just before the end of the month we add The Pirate Bay to the list and you all have now witnessed the worst June in history.
I for one am not liking this.
You shouldn't either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527667</id>
	<title>Re:Then it should go through.</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1246373880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The court case itself basically ignored the local legal code in favour of US legal precident. I can't see this project surviving the DMCA, even several thousand miles away from the DMCA's jurisdiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The court case itself basically ignored the local legal code in favour of US legal precident .
I ca n't see this project surviving the DMCA , even several thousand miles away from the DMCA 's jurisdiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The court case itself basically ignored the local legal code in favour of US legal precident.
I can't see this project surviving the DMCA, even several thousand miles away from the DMCA's jurisdiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529297</id>
	<title>dudes' just chill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246380480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow.  the pirate bay corpse isn't even cold yet and already y'all are foaming at the mouth.  Sure there is a lot of money involved, but perhaps they speak the truth(I know completly crazy thought, right?)we know nothing except that for years they gave the people what they wanted and they were "heros".  Now apparently there lepers.  People need to stop jumping to conclusions and show a little loyalty for the folks that helped you get illegal shit and didn't snitch on you.  seriously, the world is the crappy place it is because of people believing the worst of everyone.  give these guys the benefit of doubt untill they PROVE their not worthy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow .
the pirate bay corpse is n't even cold yet and already y'all are foaming at the mouth .
Sure there is a lot of money involved , but perhaps they speak the truth ( I know completly crazy thought , right ?
) we know nothing except that for years they gave the people what they wanted and they were " heros " .
Now apparently there lepers .
People need to stop jumping to conclusions and show a little loyalty for the folks that helped you get illegal shit and did n't snitch on you .
seriously , the world is the crappy place it is because of people believing the worst of everyone .
give these guys the benefit of doubt untill they PROVE their not worthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow.
the pirate bay corpse isn't even cold yet and already y'all are foaming at the mouth.
Sure there is a lot of money involved, but perhaps they speak the truth(I know completly crazy thought, right?
)we know nothing except that for years they gave the people what they wanted and they were "heros".
Now apparently there lepers.
People need to stop jumping to conclusions and show a little loyalty for the folks that helped you get illegal shit and didn't snitch on you.
seriously, the world is the crappy place it is because of people believing the worst of everyone.
give these guys the benefit of doubt untill they PROVE their not worthy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</id>
	<title>End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>NoNeeeed</author>
	<datestamp>1246371060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It's Napster all over again...</p><p>Music industry sues P2P service -&gt; service loses -&gt; service turns legit -&gt; becomes irrelevant -&gt; gets replaced by something better, and less centralized.</p><p>I'm curious what's going to come next, but I suspect this turn of events will spur on some interesting technical developments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It 's Napster all over again...Music industry sues P2P service - &gt; service loses - &gt; service turns legit - &gt; becomes irrelevant - &gt; gets replaced by something better , and less centralized.I 'm curious what 's going to come next , but I suspect this turn of events will spur on some interesting technical developments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This feels a lot like history repeating itself - It's Napster all over again...Music industry sues P2P service -&gt; service loses -&gt; service turns legit -&gt; becomes irrelevant -&gt; gets replaced by something better, and less centralized.I'm curious what's going to come next, but I suspect this turn of events will spur on some interesting technical developments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528015</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>pnuema</author>
	<datestamp>1246375560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be concerned - if the 7th circuit wasn't a US court. TPB is not in the US, in case you didn't know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be concerned - if the 7th circuit was n't a US court .
TPB is not in the US , in case you did n't know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be concerned - if the 7th circuit wasn't a US court.
TPB is not in the US, in case you didn't know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821</id>
	<title>Pirate Bay down?</title>
	<author>jassa</author>
	<datestamp>1246374600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, I haven't been able to connect to TPB for the past hour. The timing seems a tad suspicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , I have n't been able to connect to TPB for the past hour .
The timing seems a tad suspicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, I haven't been able to connect to TPB for the past hour.
The timing seems a tad suspicious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537535</id>
	<title>Re:How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>shish</author>
	<datestamp>1246372920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloads</p></div><p>If the download was as quick / simple / DRM-free as TPB is now, I would</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The file sharing community is n't the best known for paying for downloadsIf the download was as quick / simple / DRM-free as TPB is now , I would</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloadsIf the download was as quick / simple / DRM-free as TPB is now, I would
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531843</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246387800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want "completely decentralized" filesharing, just fire up Gnutella and wait 3 days for your movie to download. Checkmate content industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want " completely decentralized " filesharing , just fire up Gnutella and wait 3 days for your movie to download .
Checkmate content industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want "completely decentralized" filesharing, just fire up Gnutella and wait 3 days for your movie to download.
Checkmate content industry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529629</id>
	<title>Re:End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kademlia" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Kademlia</a> [wikipedia.org] is already here and running well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kademlia [ wikipedia.org ] is already here and running well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kademlia [wikipedia.org] is already here and running well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527223</id>
	<title>Re:No profits made?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246371780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as you hold onto your anal virginity, that's not a bad earn for a year's work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as you hold onto your anal virginity , that 's not a bad earn for a year 's work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as you hold onto your anal virginity, that's not a bad earn for a year's work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529619</id>
	<title>Re:When the going gets tough...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This whole deal smells fishy. Anyway you read it it stinks. Check out my thoughts on and CARTOON on the sale of the Pirate Bay here http://www.pcdisorder.com/2009/06/pirate-bay-kosher-treasure-found.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This whole deal smells fishy .
Anyway you read it it stinks .
Check out my thoughts on and CARTOON on the sale of the Pirate Bay here http : //www.pcdisorder.com/2009/06/pirate-bay-kosher-treasure-found.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This whole deal smells fishy.
Anyway you read it it stinks.
Check out my thoughts on and CARTOON on the sale of the Pirate Bay here http://www.pcdisorder.com/2009/06/pirate-bay-kosher-treasure-found.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528169</id>
	<title>Re:This is the end</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're fan base does -not- transfer.</p></div><p> <b>Your</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're fan base does -not- transfer .
Your</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're fan base does -not- transfer.
Your
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529335</id>
	<title>Re:The Piratebay is down</title>
	<author>Anarchduke</author>
	<datestamp>1246380540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nope seems to be back up again</htmltext>
<tokenext>nope seems to be back up again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nope seems to be back up again</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533391</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246393740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?</i></p><p>Obvious troll is obvious</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations ? Obvious troll is obvious</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?Obvious troll is obvious</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399</id>
	<title>Worrying news on Pandeya just incoming now</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1246372680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Swedish news site Realtid.se is now running an article that make this sound less than promising, even if you wasn't bothered by the concept presented in this (Slashdot) article.</p><p>Please excuse the Google Translate machine translation, but it should still be readable:<br><a href="http://translate.google.se/translate?js=n&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=sv&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Frealtid.se\%2FArticlePages\%2F200906\%2F30\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980.dbp.asp&amp;sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0=" title="google.se">http://translate.google.se/translate?js=n&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=sv&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Frealtid.se\%2FArticlePages\%2F200906\%2F30\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980.dbp.asp&amp;sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0=</a> [google.se]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Swedish news site Realtid.se is now running an article that make this sound less than promising , even if you was n't bothered by the concept presented in this ( Slashdot ) article.Please excuse the Google Translate machine translation , but it should still be readable : http : //translate.google.se/translate ? js = n&amp;prev = \ _t&amp;hl = sv&amp;ie = UTF-8&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Frealtid.se \ % 2FArticlePages \ % 2F200906 \ % 2F30 \ % 2F20090630101501 \ _Realtid980 \ % 2F20090630101501 \ _Realtid980.dbp.asp&amp;sl = sv&amp;tl = en&amp;history \ _state0 = [ google.se ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Swedish news site Realtid.se is now running an article that make this sound less than promising, even if you wasn't bothered by the concept presented in this (Slashdot) article.Please excuse the Google Translate machine translation, but it should still be readable:http://translate.google.se/translate?js=n&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=sv&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Frealtid.se\%2FArticlePages\%2F200906\%2F30\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980\%2F20090630101501\_Realtid980.dbp.asp&amp;sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0= [google.se]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28543467</id>
	<title>Re:End of one generation, beginning of another?</title>
	<author>Yogiz</author>
	<datestamp>1246467360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could it be time for an encrypted tracker (i2p,tor) for which everyone can provide proxies? Impossible to track - they'd have to go after the proxies or encryption itself. Nah, too soon I guess. Maybe after one more generation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could it be time for an encrypted tracker ( i2p,tor ) for which everyone can provide proxies ?
Impossible to track - they 'd have to go after the proxies or encryption itself .
Nah , too soon I guess .
Maybe after one more generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could it be time for an encrypted tracker (i2p,tor) for which everyone can provide proxies?
Impossible to track - they'd have to go after the proxies or encryption itself.
Nah, too soon I guess.
Maybe after one more generation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071</id>
	<title>This is the end</title>
	<author>nloop</author>
	<datestamp>1246371120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What was the point of going through the court proceedings?  Why, money, of course!<br> <br>

Also, as evidenced by Kazaa, Napster, Suprnova, and I'm sure many others that I didn't personally use, taking a free piracy site (sure, sure, pirate bay has a few legal uses, but lets be honest here) and turning it into an "innovative pay model for sharing" just doesn't work.  You're fan base does -not- transfer. Apples fan base, yeah, they buy things, iTunes can work.  Jimmy down the street downloading bootlegs?  Not buying.  GGF just wasted 60 million kroner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the point of going through the court proceedings ?
Why , money , of course !
Also , as evidenced by Kazaa , Napster , Suprnova , and I 'm sure many others that I did n't personally use , taking a free piracy site ( sure , sure , pirate bay has a few legal uses , but lets be honest here ) and turning it into an " innovative pay model for sharing " just does n't work .
You 're fan base does -not- transfer .
Apples fan base , yeah , they buy things , iTunes can work .
Jimmy down the street downloading bootlegs ?
Not buying .
GGF just wasted 60 million kroner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the point of going through the court proceedings?
Why, money, of course!
Also, as evidenced by Kazaa, Napster, Suprnova, and I'm sure many others that I didn't personally use, taking a free piracy site (sure, sure, pirate bay has a few legal uses, but lets be honest here) and turning it into an "innovative pay model for sharing" just doesn't work.
You're fan base does -not- transfer.
Apples fan base, yeah, they buy things, iTunes can work.
Jimmy down the street downloading bootlegs?
Not buying.
GGF just wasted 60 million kroner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528575</id>
	<title>talks at fisl</title>
	<author>Gusfm</author>
	<datestamp>1246377660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Peter Sunde gave two presentations last week here in Brazil. On the first one he talked about the history of TPB, and on the second one he talked about TPB services. In the end of one of his presentations (I don't remember witch one) he was asked, if someone offer to buy TPB for some money, would they sell it? His answer was that they would do what's the best to TPB (He said some more things also).
<br> <br>
I don't know why but I felt he was hiding something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Peter Sunde gave two presentations last week here in Brazil .
On the first one he talked about the history of TPB , and on the second one he talked about TPB services .
In the end of one of his presentations ( I do n't remember witch one ) he was asked , if someone offer to buy TPB for some money , would they sell it ?
His answer was that they would do what 's the best to TPB ( He said some more things also ) .
I do n't know why but I felt he was hiding something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peter Sunde gave two presentations last week here in Brazil.
On the first one he talked about the history of TPB, and on the second one he talked about TPB services.
In the end of one of his presentations (I don't remember witch one) he was asked, if someone offer to buy TPB for some money, would they sell it?
His answer was that they would do what's the best to TPB (He said some more things also).
I don't know why but I felt he was hiding something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28539797</id>
	<title>The Pirates Have Sold Out</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246441800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So shouldn't they rename the site to Buccaneer's Bay?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So should n't they rename the site to Buccaneer 's Bay ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So shouldn't they rename the site to Buccaneer's Bay?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533403</id>
	<title>You can't cheat an honest man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246393800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?</i> </p><p>The production costs for WALL-E: $180 million.</p><p> Double that for marketing and distribution.</p><p>The number of studios producing CGI feature animation at this level: 1.<br>The Amazon price for the three-disk Blu-Ray edition of WALL-E with BD Live and digital download copy: $24.99 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wall-E-Three-Disc-Special-Digital-Blu-ray/dp/B001EOQWFI" title="amazon.com">Wall-E</a> [amazon.com] </p><p>That is - at least theoretically - 150 GB of content for about one half the cost of one month of broadband cable.</p><p>Pixar's return from the geek who links to Pirate Bay: $0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations ?
The production costs for WALL-E : $ 180 million .
Double that for marketing and distribution.The number of studios producing CGI feature animation at this level : 1.The Amazon price for the three-disk Blu-Ray edition of WALL-E with BD Live and digital download copy : $ 24.99 Wall-E [ amazon.com ] That is - at least theoretically - 150 GB of content for about one half the cost of one month of broadband cable.Pixar 's return from the geek who links to Pirate Bay : $ 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?
The production costs for WALL-E: $180 million.
Double that for marketing and distribution.The number of studios producing CGI feature animation at this level: 1.The Amazon price for the three-disk Blu-Ray edition of WALL-E with BD Live and digital download copy: $24.99 Wall-E [amazon.com] That is - at least theoretically - 150 GB of content for about one half the cost of one month of broadband cable.Pixar's return from the geek who links to Pirate Bay: $0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529115</id>
	<title>Podcast interview with Peter Sunde</title>
	<author>Johan Folin</author>
	<datestamp>1246379760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Swedish free-lance journalist and IT entrepreneur Thomas Wennstr&#195;m made an interview with TPB spokesperson Peter Sunde earlier today: <a href="http://www.whatsnext.se/2009/06/30/podcast-with-peter-sunde-on-the-ggfs-accquisition-of-the-pirate-bay/" title="whatsnext.se" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatsnext.se/2009/06/30/podcast-with-peter-sunde-on-the-ggfs-accquisition-of-the-pirate-bay/</a> [whatsnext.se]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Swedish free-lance journalist and IT entrepreneur Thomas Wennstr   m made an interview with TPB spokesperson Peter Sunde earlier today : http : //www.whatsnext.se/2009/06/30/podcast-with-peter-sunde-on-the-ggfs-accquisition-of-the-pirate-bay/ [ whatsnext.se ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Swedish free-lance journalist and IT entrepreneur Thomas WennstrÃm made an interview with TPB spokesperson Peter Sunde earlier today: http://www.whatsnext.se/2009/06/30/podcast-with-peter-sunde-on-the-ggfs-accquisition-of-the-pirate-bay/ [whatsnext.se]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530985</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>Seumas</author>
	<datestamp>1246385160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed. Nobody cares about these "legitimate services", because they are always expensive, locked-down, and have too many conditions and hoops to jump through.</p><p>I understand that the guys are fighting an uphill battle in the courts, so they probably had no choice but to do this so they could pay their legal fees and judgments and hopefully walk away with a few bucks to start a new life and go on to something new.</p><p>However, I have a major problem with how this story always plays out. The same way it played out with Napster and Suprnova and other services. It's a major hypocrisy on all sides. Corporations which usually are completely draconian and absurd essentially buy the structure and eyeballs of a service formerly facilitating "questionable" delivery of content. On the other side, proponents of sharing and haters of extreme intellectual property laws, selling out to the corporations they've been fighting the whole time.</p><p>The only loser in these things is always the audience.</p><p>Think about this business plan. How is it even legally? It's certainly not ethical, no matter what side of the fence you're on (and I'm a huge TPB fan).</p><p>Site (such as Napster, etc) gains enormous fame and attention and audience providing what is supposedly a very questionable service using mostly content that they do not own and is not free to give away.</p><p>Once they have enough attention and eyeballs, corporations come a knocking.</p><p>Corporations make the founders of the service extremely wealth and then pervert the service by turning it into something "legit", thereby losing 98\% of the audience (seriously, who has ever used Napster once they went "legit"?).</p><p>This seems similar to the following proposed business plan:</p><p>I want to start a movie company, but I don't have any money or infrastructure. Instead, I decide to start stealing movie reels from Warner Brothers down the street. Then I promote and sell those movies as if they were mine. After a few years, I've stolen enough of someone else's product and sold it as my own that I've made enough money to finally go legit.</p><p>Now, using ill-gotten finances from someone else's products, I become a fully legitimate movie producing powerhouse. And everyone in the business and industry regard me as legitimate.</p><p>How can these even be allowed to happen? Isn't there someone regulating this stuff? How can a legitimate company have beginnings doing questionable things and not pay for it? It's like the Mafia suddenly deciding "Hey, we're tired of laundering money and killing people, so we're going to start a string of burger franchises". And everyone just saying "okay, cool".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Nobody cares about these " legitimate services " , because they are always expensive , locked-down , and have too many conditions and hoops to jump through.I understand that the guys are fighting an uphill battle in the courts , so they probably had no choice but to do this so they could pay their legal fees and judgments and hopefully walk away with a few bucks to start a new life and go on to something new.However , I have a major problem with how this story always plays out .
The same way it played out with Napster and Suprnova and other services .
It 's a major hypocrisy on all sides .
Corporations which usually are completely draconian and absurd essentially buy the structure and eyeballs of a service formerly facilitating " questionable " delivery of content .
On the other side , proponents of sharing and haters of extreme intellectual property laws , selling out to the corporations they 've been fighting the whole time.The only loser in these things is always the audience.Think about this business plan .
How is it even legally ?
It 's certainly not ethical , no matter what side of the fence you 're on ( and I 'm a huge TPB fan ) .Site ( such as Napster , etc ) gains enormous fame and attention and audience providing what is supposedly a very questionable service using mostly content that they do not own and is not free to give away.Once they have enough attention and eyeballs , corporations come a knocking.Corporations make the founders of the service extremely wealth and then pervert the service by turning it into something " legit " , thereby losing 98 \ % of the audience ( seriously , who has ever used Napster once they went " legit " ?
) .This seems similar to the following proposed business plan : I want to start a movie company , but I do n't have any money or infrastructure .
Instead , I decide to start stealing movie reels from Warner Brothers down the street .
Then I promote and sell those movies as if they were mine .
After a few years , I 've stolen enough of someone else 's product and sold it as my own that I 've made enough money to finally go legit.Now , using ill-gotten finances from someone else 's products , I become a fully legitimate movie producing powerhouse .
And everyone in the business and industry regard me as legitimate.How can these even be allowed to happen ?
Is n't there someone regulating this stuff ?
How can a legitimate company have beginnings doing questionable things and not pay for it ?
It 's like the Mafia suddenly deciding " Hey , we 're tired of laundering money and killing people , so we 're going to start a string of burger franchises " .
And everyone just saying " okay , cool " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Nobody cares about these "legitimate services", because they are always expensive, locked-down, and have too many conditions and hoops to jump through.I understand that the guys are fighting an uphill battle in the courts, so they probably had no choice but to do this so they could pay their legal fees and judgments and hopefully walk away with a few bucks to start a new life and go on to something new.However, I have a major problem with how this story always plays out.
The same way it played out with Napster and Suprnova and other services.
It's a major hypocrisy on all sides.
Corporations which usually are completely draconian and absurd essentially buy the structure and eyeballs of a service formerly facilitating "questionable" delivery of content.
On the other side, proponents of sharing and haters of extreme intellectual property laws, selling out to the corporations they've been fighting the whole time.The only loser in these things is always the audience.Think about this business plan.
How is it even legally?
It's certainly not ethical, no matter what side of the fence you're on (and I'm a huge TPB fan).Site (such as Napster, etc) gains enormous fame and attention and audience providing what is supposedly a very questionable service using mostly content that they do not own and is not free to give away.Once they have enough attention and eyeballs, corporations come a knocking.Corporations make the founders of the service extremely wealth and then pervert the service by turning it into something "legit", thereby losing 98\% of the audience (seriously, who has ever used Napster once they went "legit"?
).This seems similar to the following proposed business plan:I want to start a movie company, but I don't have any money or infrastructure.
Instead, I decide to start stealing movie reels from Warner Brothers down the street.
Then I promote and sell those movies as if they were mine.
After a few years, I've stolen enough of someone else's product and sold it as my own that I've made enough money to finally go legit.Now, using ill-gotten finances from someone else's products, I become a fully legitimate movie producing powerhouse.
And everyone in the business and industry regard me as legitimate.How can these even be allowed to happen?
Isn't there someone regulating this stuff?
How can a legitimate company have beginnings doing questionable things and not pay for it?
It's like the Mafia suddenly deciding "Hey, we're tired of laundering money and killing people, so we're going to start a string of burger franchises".
And everyone just saying "okay, cool".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527061</id>
	<title>Re:No profits made?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1246371120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are assuming that the appeals fails which I doubt it will once they get a judge who is halfway decent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are assuming that the appeals fails which I doubt it will once they get a judge who is halfway decent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are assuming that the appeals fails which I doubt it will once they get a judge who is halfway decent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527179</id>
	<title>The Pirate Party?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246371600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, having your political party's idealistic figurehead be bought by an internet cafe if kind of a kick in the balls, huh?  Does GGF now get a seat in their parliament?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , having your political party 's idealistic figurehead be bought by an internet cafe if kind of a kick in the balls , huh ?
Does GGF now get a seat in their parliament ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, having your political party's idealistic figurehead be bought by an internet cafe if kind of a kick in the balls, huh?
Does GGF now get a seat in their parliament?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246374960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich. So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the end , it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich .
So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich.
So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532025</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>WndrBr3d</author>
	<datestamp>1246388460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Idealism is not dead: <i>The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets. I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all. Don't worry - be happy!</i></p> </div><p>Read: This money is going to pay our legal fees as we try to save our asses!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Idealism is not dead : The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech , freedom of information and the openess of the nets .
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all .
Do n't worry - be happy !
Read : This money is going to pay our legal fees as we try to save our asses !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idealism is not dead: The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets.
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all.
Don't worry - be happy!
Read: This money is going to pay our legal fees as we try to save our asses!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527277</id>
	<title>A joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246372080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, they wouldn't just hand over the site to someone else could they?  What if the mpaa or riaa, the entertainment industry tries to make some deal with them about ip logs?</p><p>Could this be the beginning of more lawsuits?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , they would n't just hand over the site to someone else could they ?
What if the mpaa or riaa , the entertainment industry tries to make some deal with them about ip logs ? Could this be the beginning of more lawsuits ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, they wouldn't just hand over the site to someone else could they?
What if the mpaa or riaa, the entertainment industry tries to make some deal with them about ip logs?Could this be the beginning of more lawsuits?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528969</id>
	<title>Re:The Piratebay is down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246379220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah...thats a troll.<br>thepiratebay.org is very much up and alive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah...thats a troll.thepiratebay.org is very much up and alive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...thats a troll.thepiratebay.org is very much up and alive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527325</id>
	<title>What does this mean?</title>
	<author>j00bhaka</author>
	<datestamp>1246372320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>TPB founders say they will be using the money for good; to support idealism and promote free speech.  What happens when the money is depleted and they can no longer use TPB to combat corporate and government ignorance?</htmltext>
<tokenext>TPB founders say they will be using the money for good ; to support idealism and promote free speech .
What happens when the money is depleted and they can no longer use TPB to combat corporate and government ignorance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TPB founders say they will be using the money for good; to support idealism and promote free speech.
What happens when the money is depleted and they can no longer use TPB to combat corporate and government ignorance?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528883</id>
	<title>Re:How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246378860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of the Pirate Bay's appeal consisted in not charging. And it's not the company's choice whether or not to reveal personal data. Eventually they will be forced to collect and reveal them by law, or to install a backdoor. If the Swedish state is reluctant to force them, some court or the EU will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the Pirate Bay 's appeal consisted in not charging .
And it 's not the company 's choice whether or not to reveal personal data .
Eventually they will be forced to collect and reveal them by law , or to install a backdoor .
If the Swedish state is reluctant to force them , some court or the EU will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the Pirate Bay's appeal consisted in not charging.
And it's not the company's choice whether or not to reveal personal data.
Eventually they will be forced to collect and reveal them by law, or to install a backdoor.
If the Swedish state is reluctant to force them, some court or the EU will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529861</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>stevey</author>
	<datestamp>1246382220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess the old adage is true:</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>Swearing trumps proof.</i> </p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the old adage is true : Swearing trumps proof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the old adage is true: Swearing trumps proof. 

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533919</id>
	<title>Re:This is the end</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246352820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, all uses of that site were by definition legal. Only what happens when you use that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.torrent file, to actually download something, was what was a bit gray.<br>Also please stop buying in to the **AA propaganda bullshit by using unwords, like "piracy". If you use it, the **AA knows, that their method works on you. Don't allow that to happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , all uses of that site were by definition legal .
Only what happens when you use that .torrent file , to actually download something , was what was a bit gray.Also please stop buying in to the * * AA propaganda bullshit by using unwords , like " piracy " .
If you use it , the * * AA knows , that their method works on you .
Do n't allow that to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, all uses of that site were by definition legal.
Only what happens when you use that .torrent file, to actually download something, was what was a bit gray.Also please stop buying in to the **AA propaganda bullshit by using unwords, like "piracy".
If you use it, the **AA knows, that their method works on you.
Don't allow that to happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527057</id>
	<title>Re:No profits made?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1246371120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By the time they pay all the taxes, I doubt very seriously anyone will be walking away with anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By the time they pay all the taxes , I doubt very seriously anyone will be walking away with anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the time they pay all the taxes, I doubt very seriously anyone will be walking away with anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534373</id>
	<title>Re:How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1246354560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloads</p></div><p>I'm not so sure about that. AllOfMP3 and its countless clones were (and remain) very popular, largely among the same community.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The file sharing community is n't the best known for paying for downloadsI 'm not so sure about that .
AllOfMP3 and its countless clones were ( and remain ) very popular , largely among the same community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloadsI'm not so sure about that.
AllOfMP3 and its countless clones were (and remain) very popular, largely among the same community.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532845</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1246391340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the first time either.</p><p>Anyone remember I think it was Loki torrent or something where he asked for donations to fight an RIAA court case but instead just took the money and ran?</p><p>The movement for change to copyright, or the piracy movement or whatever you want to call it doesn't need idols for exactly the reason P2P works so well - it's decentralised.</p><p>Similarly I think the guys purchasing TPB are idiots, no one in their right mind would trust a torrent site that is corporately owned and says it wants to turn into a legitimate service (not that it wasn't technically legitimate under Swedish law anyway).</p><p>Another site will step up and take it's place, the TPB guys will have traded this deal for public support, and no one will frankly care now if they end up going to jail. P2P will continue, with a new site, or perhaps even an existing one - BTJunkie already had a bigger userbase afaik and TPB will be a site no one uses anymore.</p><p>Ultimately TPB guys are human, but that doesn't mean this is a stupid move. Even if as they say it is to get money to continue the fight it's a severe blow to their credibility. The best they can do now is be 100\% transparent and provide evidence of where every penny goes, if not it's only fair people assume it's gone into their pockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the first time either.Anyone remember I think it was Loki torrent or something where he asked for donations to fight an RIAA court case but instead just took the money and ran ? The movement for change to copyright , or the piracy movement or whatever you want to call it does n't need idols for exactly the reason P2P works so well - it 's decentralised.Similarly I think the guys purchasing TPB are idiots , no one in their right mind would trust a torrent site that is corporately owned and says it wants to turn into a legitimate service ( not that it was n't technically legitimate under Swedish law anyway ) .Another site will step up and take it 's place , the TPB guys will have traded this deal for public support , and no one will frankly care now if they end up going to jail .
P2P will continue , with a new site , or perhaps even an existing one - BTJunkie already had a bigger userbase afaik and TPB will be a site no one uses anymore.Ultimately TPB guys are human , but that does n't mean this is a stupid move .
Even if as they say it is to get money to continue the fight it 's a severe blow to their credibility .
The best they can do now is be 100 \ % transparent and provide evidence of where every penny goes , if not it 's only fair people assume it 's gone into their pockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the first time either.Anyone remember I think it was Loki torrent or something where he asked for donations to fight an RIAA court case but instead just took the money and ran?The movement for change to copyright, or the piracy movement or whatever you want to call it doesn't need idols for exactly the reason P2P works so well - it's decentralised.Similarly I think the guys purchasing TPB are idiots, no one in their right mind would trust a torrent site that is corporately owned and says it wants to turn into a legitimate service (not that it wasn't technically legitimate under Swedish law anyway).Another site will step up and take it's place, the TPB guys will have traded this deal for public support, and no one will frankly care now if they end up going to jail.
P2P will continue, with a new site, or perhaps even an existing one - BTJunkie already had a bigger userbase afaik and TPB will be a site no one uses anymore.Ultimately TPB guys are human, but that doesn't mean this is a stupid move.
Even if as they say it is to get money to continue the fight it's a severe blow to their credibility.
The best they can do now is be 100\% transparent and provide evidence of where every penny goes, if not it's only fair people assume it's gone into their pockets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533645</id>
	<title>That's it. The Pirate Bay is DEAD.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246394880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Long live the Pirate Bay.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:((</p><p>How can the ex-owners of the Pirate Bay not know their history? They will become another Napster. A "industry-platform", with ads en-masse, filters for "illegal" content, an about page that allows you to win bullshit bingo in under one minute (= full with words like "leverage", etc), and so on. Nobody will use them anymore. And the next generation will pop up.</p><p>Oh well, they got my last vote, but after that sellout, they will not get the next one.<br>This is the best indicator, that they too will become just another party, that follows the money, and the money alone, just as the green party did.<br>Interestingly, they just announced that they will join the green party's fraction in the EU "parliament".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Long live the Pirate Bay .
: ( ( How can the ex-owners of the Pirate Bay not know their history ?
They will become another Napster .
A " industry-platform " , with ads en-masse , filters for " illegal " content , an about page that allows you to win bullshit bingo in under one minute ( = full with words like " leverage " , etc ) , and so on .
Nobody will use them anymore .
And the next generation will pop up.Oh well , they got my last vote , but after that sellout , they will not get the next one.This is the best indicator , that they too will become just another party , that follows the money , and the money alone , just as the green party did.Interestingly , they just announced that they will join the green party 's fraction in the EU " parliament " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long live the Pirate Bay.
:((How can the ex-owners of the Pirate Bay not know their history?
They will become another Napster.
A "industry-platform", with ads en-masse, filters for "illegal" content, an about page that allows you to win bullshit bingo in under one minute (= full with words like "leverage", etc), and so on.
Nobody will use them anymore.
And the next generation will pop up.Oh well, they got my last vote, but after that sellout, they will not get the next one.This is the best indicator, that they too will become just another party, that follows the money, and the money alone, just as the green party did.Interestingly, they just announced that they will join the green party's fraction in the EU "parliament".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528059</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>spyrochaete</author>
	<datestamp>1246375740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like Suprnova, and ShareReactor, and Mininova, and Pizzatorrent, and a zillion others.  That's the end of that, and the beginning of another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like Suprnova , and ShareReactor , and Mininova , and Pizzatorrent , and a zillion others .
That 's the end of that , and the beginning of another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like Suprnova, and ShareReactor, and Mininova, and Pizzatorrent, and a zillion others.
That's the end of that, and the beginning of another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881</id>
	<title>suckers</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1246370220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hehe, sure sold 'em that bridge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hehe , sure sold 'em that bridge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hehe, sure sold 'em that bridge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528619</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>doti</author>
	<datestamp>1246377840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have not sold the fight, just the name.</p><p>I hope.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have not sold the fight , just the name.I hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have not sold the fight, just the name.I hope.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537995</id>
	<title>Re:TPB blog</title>
	<author>choongiri</author>
	<datestamp>1246377000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>"A lot of people are worried. We're not and you shouldn't be either!"</em> </p><p>I wouldn't be worried, either, if I was retiring with a $7,800,000 nest egg.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A lot of people are worried .
We 're not and you should n't be either !
" I would n't be worried , either , if I was retiring with a $ 7,800,000 nest egg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "A lot of people are worried.
We're not and you shouldn't be either!
" I wouldn't be worried, either, if I was retiring with a $7,800,000 nest egg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528217</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's possible that TPB is outside the jurisdiction of the "United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's possible that TPB is outside the jurisdiction of the " United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's possible that TPB is outside the jurisdiction of the "United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531827</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246387740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or they have decided they need to pay their fines/lawyers and/or serve their jail time....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or they have decided they need to pay their fines/lawyers and/or serve their jail time... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or they have decided they need to pay their fines/lawyers and/or serve their jail time....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28536029</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1246362960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich. So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?</p></div><p>Well, they have to pay the fine somehow...  I never expected them to have to rot in jail for 20 years to make their point, although I hear that the money may not even go that way.  We'll see what the Court has to say about that....</p><p>One would argue that they have already done a lot for the scene that they were promoting, and they put their asses on the line in terms of civil and criminal charges and running a site that had a bullseye on its back from Day One.</p><p>In the end, I don't know if they right in their convictions, and they certainly pushed the envelope, but I have trouble calling them sellouts.  They seem anything but that.  If anything, the goods would likely have been somehow confiscated anyway at some point, shell corporation or not.  They might as well get something out of it while they can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the end , it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich .
So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations ? Well , they have to pay the fine somehow... I never expected them to have to rot in jail for 20 years to make their point , although I hear that the money may not even go that way .
We 'll see what the Court has to say about that....One would argue that they have already done a lot for the scene that they were promoting , and they put their asses on the line in terms of civil and criminal charges and running a site that had a bullseye on its back from Day One.In the end , I do n't know if they right in their convictions , and they certainly pushed the envelope , but I have trouble calling them sellouts .
They seem anything but that .
If anything , the goods would likely have been somehow confiscated anyway at some point , shell corporation or not .
They might as well get something out of it while they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich.
So now can we get off this delusion that the owners of the pirate bay are heroes somehow out to protect our rights in the face of evil corporations?Well, they have to pay the fine somehow...  I never expected them to have to rot in jail for 20 years to make their point, although I hear that the money may not even go that way.
We'll see what the Court has to say about that....One would argue that they have already done a lot for the scene that they were promoting, and they put their asses on the line in terms of civil and criminal charges and running a site that had a bullseye on its back from Day One.In the end, I don't know if they right in their convictions, and they certainly pushed the envelope, but I have trouble calling them sellouts.
They seem anything but that.
If anything, the goods would likely have been somehow confiscated anyway at some point, shell corporation or not.
They might as well get something out of it while they can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899</id>
	<title>Then it should go through.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The technology is legal, <b>some</b> of the files shared may not be. That will depend on your local legal code.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology is legal , some of the files shared may not be .
That will depend on your local legal code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology is legal, some of the files shared may not be.
That will depend on your local legal code.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28553663</id>
	<title>Google Piracy</title>
	<author>manflaps</author>
	<datestamp>1246466340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just use e-mail account generation and store all the pr0n as gmail attachments.  duh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just use e-mail account generation and store all the pr0n as gmail attachments .
duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just use e-mail account generation and store all the pr0n as gmail attachments.
duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530367</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1246383660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"At this point, the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them. With the media industries monetary, political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system, they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it."

The fact that they, and the people using their site, were breaking the law probably had nothing to do with it, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" At this point , the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them .
With the media industries monetary , political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system , they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it .
" The fact that they , and the people using their site , were breaking the law probably had nothing to do with it , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"At this point, the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them.
With the media industries monetary, political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system, they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it.
"

The fact that they, and the people using their site, were breaking the law probably had nothing to do with it, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28538075</id>
	<title>Re:How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1246377720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they'll make money by selling the IP addresses and email addresses of all their registered users to the RIAA &amp; MPAA</htmltext>
<tokenext>they 'll make money by selling the IP addresses and email addresses of all their registered users to the RIAA &amp; MPAA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they'll make money by selling the IP addresses and email addresses of all their registered users to the RIAA &amp; MPAA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528287</id>
	<title>Re:Pirate Bay down?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246376640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well I hear they are handling a deluge of traffic right now.  I wonder why.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I hear they are handling a deluge of traffic right now .
I wonder why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I hear they are handling a deluge of traffic right now.
I wonder why.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529005</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1246379280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block"</p><p>Its kind of hard to tell what exactly happened in Iran, but I've seen speculation that the protesters extensive use of Twitter and the Internet mostly just made it easier for the Iranian government to identify the trouble makers and where they lived so they could pay them a visit.  Its possible the use of Twitter just made it easier to crush the protests more quickly.  If you are advocating the overthrow of a government from within anonymity is relatively important.</p><p>When you are trying to topple an authoritarian regime using the Internet from anything other than an untraceable IP address seems extremely unwise to me especially when all of Iran's internet traffic is being funneled through monitored choke points.</p><p>It is likewise being somewhat optimistic at this point to think that any site that will enable widespread piracy is going to be impervious to tracing, warrants and shutdown notices.  About the only way to do it is for the hub to be located in a pariah country that is indifferent to digital rights and which will ignore the complaints, and block any attempt to traces the IP addresses going in and out of the hub.  Its pretty tough to be a rogue nation if the U.S. and E.U. use their governments to apply diplomatic and economic pressure.  China seems to be one of the few countries mostly immune to western digital rights concerns.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block " Its kind of hard to tell what exactly happened in Iran , but I 've seen speculation that the protesters extensive use of Twitter and the Internet mostly just made it easier for the Iranian government to identify the trouble makers and where they lived so they could pay them a visit .
Its possible the use of Twitter just made it easier to crush the protests more quickly .
If you are advocating the overthrow of a government from within anonymity is relatively important.When you are trying to topple an authoritarian regime using the Internet from anything other than an untraceable IP address seems extremely unwise to me especially when all of Iran 's internet traffic is being funneled through monitored choke points.It is likewise being somewhat optimistic at this point to think that any site that will enable widespread piracy is going to be impervious to tracing , warrants and shutdown notices .
About the only way to do it is for the hub to be located in a pariah country that is indifferent to digital rights and which will ignore the complaints , and block any attempt to traces the IP addresses going in and out of the hub .
Its pretty tough to be a rogue nation if the U.S. and E.U .
use their governments to apply diplomatic and economic pressure .
China seems to be one of the few countries mostly immune to western digital rights concerns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block"Its kind of hard to tell what exactly happened in Iran, but I've seen speculation that the protesters extensive use of Twitter and the Internet mostly just made it easier for the Iranian government to identify the trouble makers and where they lived so they could pay them a visit.
Its possible the use of Twitter just made it easier to crush the protests more quickly.
If you are advocating the overthrow of a government from within anonymity is relatively important.When you are trying to topple an authoritarian regime using the Internet from anything other than an untraceable IP address seems extremely unwise to me especially when all of Iran's internet traffic is being funneled through monitored choke points.It is likewise being somewhat optimistic at this point to think that any site that will enable widespread piracy is going to be impervious to tracing, warrants and shutdown notices.
About the only way to do it is for the hub to be located in a pariah country that is indifferent to digital rights and which will ignore the complaints, and block any attempt to traces the IP addresses going in and out of the hub.
Its pretty tough to be a rogue nation if the U.S. and E.U.
use their governments to apply diplomatic and economic pressure.
China seems to be one of the few countries mostly immune to western digital rights concerns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527847</id>
	<title>The server at thepiratebay.org is taking too long</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246374780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone has a mirror...or torrent for the site?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone has a mirror...or torrent for the site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone has a mirror...or torrent for the site?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528007</id>
	<title>Re:Goodbye TPB</title>
	<author>n00btastic</author>
	<datestamp>1246375560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. If you had read 1/10th of the comments posted, you would of read that the money is being used for political activism. They knew the spirit behind TPB could not be sold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
If you had read 1/10th of the comments posted , you would of read that the money is being used for political activism .
They knew the spirit behind TPB could not be sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
If you had read 1/10th of the comments posted, you would of read that the money is being used for political activism.
They knew the spirit behind TPB could not be sold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532843</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246391340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does it matter what their intentions are, if they are preserving our rights? Remember that many free speech rights (in the United States) are preserved only because Larry Flynt, by nearly all accounts a despicable human being, was willing to fight for them. If you disagree with the idea of reformed copyright policy, that's one thing. But discounting all the work the Pirate Bay Founders have done just because they made money in the end is disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it matter what their intentions are , if they are preserving our rights ?
Remember that many free speech rights ( in the United States ) are preserved only because Larry Flynt , by nearly all accounts a despicable human being , was willing to fight for them .
If you disagree with the idea of reformed copyright policy , that 's one thing .
But discounting all the work the Pirate Bay Founders have done just because they made money in the end is disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it matter what their intentions are, if they are preserving our rights?
Remember that many free speech rights (in the United States) are preserved only because Larry Flynt, by nearly all accounts a despicable human being, was willing to fight for them.
If you disagree with the idea of reformed copyright policy, that's one thing.
But discounting all the work the Pirate Bay Founders have done just because they made money in the end is disgusting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528435</id>
	<title>Re:No profits made?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1246377180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- but each will hold their behinds and waddle away from prison with about $1,050,000 after all is said and done</p><p>There..,.fixed that for you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- but each will hold their behinds and waddle away from prison with about $ 1,050,000 after all is said and doneThere..,.fixed that for you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- but each will hold their behinds and waddle away from prison with about $1,050,000 after all is said and doneThere..,.fixed that for you</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</id>
	<title>How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>notseamus</author>
	<datestamp>1246370760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloads (although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc), but if this company starts charging for access to TPB or per download, they'd better make sure that they won't reveal any names or info about downloaders. Otherwise all of their appeal will have evaporated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The file sharing community is n't the best known for paying for downloads ( although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc ) , but if this company starts charging for access to TPB or per download , they 'd better make sure that they wo n't reveal any names or info about downloaders .
Otherwise all of their appeal will have evaporated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The file sharing community isn't the best known for paying for downloads (although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc), but if this company starts charging for access to TPB or per download, they'd better make sure that they won't reveal any names or info about downloaders.
Otherwise all of their appeal will have evaporated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</id>
	<title>They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246370580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>On The Pirate Bay <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/blog/164" title="thepiratebay.org" rel="nofollow">blog</a> [thepiratebay.org] the TPB crew gives their side of the story. <br>
<br>
Idealism is not dead: <i>The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets. I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all. Don't worry - be happy!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>On The Pirate Bay blog [ thepiratebay.org ] the TPB crew gives their side of the story .
Idealism is not dead : The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech , freedom of information and the openess of the nets .
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all .
Do n't worry - be happy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On The Pirate Bay blog [thepiratebay.org] the TPB crew gives their side of the story.
Idealism is not dead: The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets.
I hope everybody will help out in that and realize that this is the best option for all.
Don't worry - be happy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527161</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246371540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DO NOT CLICK ON THAT LINK!  It's a forced redirect that keeps giving endless pop-ups about navigating away from the site.  Only way to stop it is to kill Firefox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DO NOT CLICK ON THAT LINK !
It 's a forced redirect that keeps giving endless pop-ups about navigating away from the site .
Only way to stop it is to kill Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DO NOT CLICK ON THAT LINK!
It's a forced redirect that keeps giving endless pop-ups about navigating away from the site.
Only way to stop it is to kill Firefox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527229</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>castironpigeon</author>
	<datestamp>1246371840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is the best option. It's obvious you can't go toe to toe with the media interest groups right now and TPB had long ago grown too large to stay under the radar any longer. What could they do?<br> <br>This is a good way to step out of the frying pan they've landed in, regroup, and, if they're still interested, figure out another way to compete with the interest groups a few years down the line. It may be idealist to think they'll want to spend their entire lives fighting for this cause, but if they really go through with that then this is the most practical way to do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is the best option .
It 's obvious you ca n't go toe to toe with the media interest groups right now and TPB had long ago grown too large to stay under the radar any longer .
What could they do ?
This is a good way to step out of the frying pan they 've landed in , regroup , and , if they 're still interested , figure out another way to compete with the interest groups a few years down the line .
It may be idealist to think they 'll want to spend their entire lives fighting for this cause , but if they really go through with that then this is the most practical way to do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is the best option.
It's obvious you can't go toe to toe with the media interest groups right now and TPB had long ago grown too large to stay under the radar any longer.
What could they do?
This is a good way to step out of the frying pan they've landed in, regroup, and, if they're still interested, figure out another way to compete with the interest groups a few years down the line.
It may be idealist to think they'll want to spend their entire lives fighting for this cause, but if they really go through with that then this is the most practical way to do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527725</id>
	<title>Legal and appropriate?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246374120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other words, profitable? HOW?</p><p>Ponder this for a moment: What did you buy?</p><p>1) A database, consisting of torrents. The "illegal" content can't be used. The legal content can be gotten anywhere. Nobody will pay for this.</p><p>2) A brand name. People go to TBP to look up torrents. If they can't do that for free, they will go elsewhere. Nobody will pay for this either.</p><p>3) Erh... beats me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , profitable ?
HOW ? Ponder this for a moment : What did you buy ? 1 ) A database , consisting of torrents .
The " illegal " content ca n't be used .
The legal content can be gotten anywhere .
Nobody will pay for this.2 ) A brand name .
People go to TBP to look up torrents .
If they ca n't do that for free , they will go elsewhere .
Nobody will pay for this either.3 ) Erh... beats me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, profitable?
HOW?Ponder this for a moment: What did you buy?1) A database, consisting of torrents.
The "illegal" content can't be used.
The legal content can be gotten anywhere.
Nobody will pay for this.2) A brand name.
People go to TBP to look up torrents.
If they can't do that for free, they will go elsewhere.
Nobody will pay for this either.3) Erh... beats me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527175</id>
	<title>VPN?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246371600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's to happen regarding the IPREDator VPN service?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's to happen regarding the IPREDator VPN service ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's to happen regarding the IPREDator VPN service?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115</id>
	<title>TPB blog</title>
	<author>migla</author>
	<datestamp>1246371360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"A lot of people are worried. We're not and you shouldn't be either!":</p><p><a href="http://thepiratebay.org/blog" title="thepiratebay.org">http://thepiratebay.org/blog</a> [thepiratebay.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A lot of people are worried .
We 're not and you should n't be either !
" : http : //thepiratebay.org/blog [ thepiratebay.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A lot of people are worried.
We're not and you shouldn't be either!
":http://thepiratebay.org/blog [thepiratebay.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943</id>
	<title>Re:Sold out</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246375260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, the party is over. The site has been defeated.</p><p>This is a <i>massive</i> victory for the *AA organisations. There is little doubt that the site is being sold to pay off the colossal fines incurred as a result of the Pirate bay trial. It's probably the case that the final straw was the appeal courts <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8121680.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">brazen exoneration</a> [bbc.co.uk] of the original trial judge on charges of bias.</p><p>At this point, the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them. With the media industries monetary, political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system, they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it. Remember <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7999563.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">how confident they were</a> [bbc.co.uk] when the trial began. I think they've finally lost that enthusiasm.</p><p>This case has proven one great truth. Even those a bold, outspoken and idealistic as the Pirate Bay founders can and will be broken by the weight of legal and political forces that can be sent against them. Any centralised component in a P2P system is and forever will be a critical weakpoint. This includes search engines like Google.</p><p>The only possible way for P2P to succeed, and with it a free internet, is for the system to become <i>totally and utterly decentralised</i>. Nothing else will suffice. There can be no one site, no one client, no one port, no one encryption method that can remain to scuttle the entire project. It must be, like TCP or SMTP, an ideal which no one controls yet everyone can use. It must not be tied to a single person, or webhost, or legal system. If it is, then the weakest link in the chain will shatter under the weight it will be forced to bear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , the party is over .
The site has been defeated.This is a massive victory for the * AA organisations .
There is little doubt that the site is being sold to pay off the colossal fines incurred as a result of the Pirate bay trial .
It 's probably the case that the final straw was the appeal courts brazen exoneration [ bbc.co.uk ] of the original trial judge on charges of bias.At this point , the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them .
With the media industries monetary , political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system , they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it .
Remember how confident they were [ bbc.co.uk ] when the trial began .
I think they 've finally lost that enthusiasm.This case has proven one great truth .
Even those a bold , outspoken and idealistic as the Pirate Bay founders can and will be broken by the weight of legal and political forces that can be sent against them .
Any centralised component in a P2P system is and forever will be a critical weakpoint .
This includes search engines like Google.The only possible way for P2P to succeed , and with it a free internet , is for the system to become totally and utterly decentralised .
Nothing else will suffice .
There can be no one site , no one client , no one port , no one encryption method that can remain to scuttle the entire project .
It must be , like TCP or SMTP , an ideal which no one controls yet everyone can use .
It must not be tied to a single person , or webhost , or legal system .
If it is , then the weakest link in the chain will shatter under the weight it will be forced to bear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, the party is over.
The site has been defeated.This is a massive victory for the *AA organisations.
There is little doubt that the site is being sold to pay off the colossal fines incurred as a result of the Pirate bay trial.
It's probably the case that the final straw was the appeal courts brazen exoneration [bbc.co.uk] of the original trial judge on charges of bias.At this point, the Bay founders probably realise just how much the entire justice system was railed against them.
With the media industries monetary, political and personal connections being able to exert such heavy influence on the Swedish justice system, they never had a ghost of a chance and now they know it.
Remember how confident they were [bbc.co.uk] when the trial began.
I think they've finally lost that enthusiasm.This case has proven one great truth.
Even those a bold, outspoken and idealistic as the Pirate Bay founders can and will be broken by the weight of legal and political forces that can be sent against them.
Any centralised component in a P2P system is and forever will be a critical weakpoint.
This includes search engines like Google.The only possible way for P2P to succeed, and with it a free internet, is for the system to become totally and utterly decentralised.
Nothing else will suffice.
There can be no one site, no one client, no one port, no one encryption method that can remain to scuttle the entire project.
It must be, like TCP or SMTP, an ideal which no one controls yet everyone can use.
It must not be tied to a single person, or webhost, or legal system.
If it is, then the weakest link in the chain will shatter under the weight it will be forced to bear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</id>
	<title>Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246371000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The following comment was made by <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/8wwkp/they\_they\_sold\_the\_pirate\_bay/c0aow1t" title="reddit.com" rel="nofollow">krs on another site</a> [reddit.com]</p><p>To clarify a bit..</p><p>TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners. The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong, the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.</p><p>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents. This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.</p><p>The 3d party company services will have APIs, so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds. remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead? well that goes for torrents and TPB to.</p><p>All in all, this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.</p><p>And dont worry, not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB, not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The following comment was made by krs on another site [ reddit.com ] To clarify a bit..TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners .
The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong , the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.Now , the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track , just that they connect peers , and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents .
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The 3d party company services will have APIs , so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds .
remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead ?
well that goes for torrents and TPB to.All in all , this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.And dont worry , not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff .
/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB , not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The following comment was made by krs on another site [reddit.com]To clarify a bit..TPB has been owned by a company for the last years since the raid so nothing there will really change except the names of the owners.
The talk about TPB are going to be a pay site is wrong, the CEO that said that does not know what he is talking about.Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The 3d party company services will have APIs, so you can on your blog or whatever have your own small torrent listings just as you now pull in twitter feeds.
remember how the twitter design totally havoced the iranian attempts to block it as ppl just used another side that pulled in the feeds and read it there instead?
well that goes for torrents and TPB to.All in all, this is not the end of the world as some are seeing it but a rather interesting technical improvement.And dont worry, not a dime will go to the media industries spectrial prize money what i know of but a really nice fund for doing cool stuff.
/krs - co.founder of TPB and PB, not involved in TPB anymore and have no stake in any cash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530901</id>
	<title>Re:They're not even keeping the money...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246384920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You really believe that BS? hahahahaha</htmltext>
<tokenext>You really believe that BS ?
hahahahaha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really believe that BS?
hahahahaha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530061</id>
	<title>They won't get rich?</title>
	<author>Lord Satri</author>
	<datestamp>1246382880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich.</p></div><p>Not true? Judging from TFA, the amount they get is the amount of the fine they have to pay. (obviously, that's probably not the only numbers of the equation)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the end , it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich.Not true ?
Judging from TFA , the amount they get is the amount of the fine they have to pay .
( obviously , that 's probably not the only numbers of the equation )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the end, it just turns out to be a bunch of people scamming others so they get rich.Not true?
Judging from TFA, the amount they get is the amount of the fine they have to pay.
(obviously, that's probably not the only numbers of the equation)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531629</id>
	<title>Re:Then it should go through.</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1246387020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*Some* of the files *may* not be legal to share.  Don't you think that's glossing over the whole thing?  The site was specifically set up to track things that are illegal and can't be tracked other places.  No one needs a huge site to track Linux ISOs, those are already out there.  It's already easy to find them (a <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+filetype:torrent&amp;sourceid=opera\_g&amp;num=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8" title="google.com">Google search</a> [google.com] will do that).  The name "Pirate Bay", and the logo of a cassette tape with crossbones, indicates that the original purpose of the site was to search for "pirated" music.  Or else why would they choose that name and logo?</p><p>It's fair to say that more than half of the files listed in the Audio, Video, Applications, and Games sections are not legal for distribution in any location that has copyright laws or treaties with the US.  <b>But the number of files is not the important statistic</b>, and can't even be calculated.  The important statistic, which can be calculated, is which files are actually getting downloaded the most.  So, look over the total top 100:</p><p><a href="http://thepiratebay.org/top/all" title="thepiratebay.org">http://thepiratebay.org/top/all</a> [thepiratebay.org]</p><p>See anything there that's legal to distribute in most jurisdictions?  Or how about the top 100 from just the Applications category:</p><p><a href="http://thepiratebay.org/top/300" title="thepiratebay.org">http://thepiratebay.org/top/300</a> [thepiratebay.org]</p><p>It's pretty disingenuous to say that "some of the files may not be legal", although that's a true statement.  It's much more accurate to say that "most of the files people download are not legal for distribution in most jurisdictions".  But saying it like that, and realizing that all of this technology is essentially being used by college kids to download crappy movies, sort of takes the "nobility" out of the whole thing, doesn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Some * of the files * may * not be legal to share .
Do n't you think that 's glossing over the whole thing ?
The site was specifically set up to track things that are illegal and ca n't be tracked other places .
No one needs a huge site to track Linux ISOs , those are already out there .
It 's already easy to find them ( a Google search [ google.com ] will do that ) .
The name " Pirate Bay " , and the logo of a cassette tape with crossbones , indicates that the original purpose of the site was to search for " pirated " music .
Or else why would they choose that name and logo ? It 's fair to say that more than half of the files listed in the Audio , Video , Applications , and Games sections are not legal for distribution in any location that has copyright laws or treaties with the US .
But the number of files is not the important statistic , and ca n't even be calculated .
The important statistic , which can be calculated , is which files are actually getting downloaded the most .
So , look over the total top 100 : http : //thepiratebay.org/top/all [ thepiratebay.org ] See anything there that 's legal to distribute in most jurisdictions ?
Or how about the top 100 from just the Applications category : http : //thepiratebay.org/top/300 [ thepiratebay.org ] It 's pretty disingenuous to say that " some of the files may not be legal " , although that 's a true statement .
It 's much more accurate to say that " most of the files people download are not legal for distribution in most jurisdictions " .
But saying it like that , and realizing that all of this technology is essentially being used by college kids to download crappy movies , sort of takes the " nobility " out of the whole thing , does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Some* of the files *may* not be legal to share.
Don't you think that's glossing over the whole thing?
The site was specifically set up to track things that are illegal and can't be tracked other places.
No one needs a huge site to track Linux ISOs, those are already out there.
It's already easy to find them (a Google search [google.com] will do that).
The name "Pirate Bay", and the logo of a cassette tape with crossbones, indicates that the original purpose of the site was to search for "pirated" music.
Or else why would they choose that name and logo?It's fair to say that more than half of the files listed in the Audio, Video, Applications, and Games sections are not legal for distribution in any location that has copyright laws or treaties with the US.
But the number of files is not the important statistic, and can't even be calculated.
The important statistic, which can be calculated, is which files are actually getting downloaded the most.
So, look over the total top 100:http://thepiratebay.org/top/all [thepiratebay.org]See anything there that's legal to distribute in most jurisdictions?
Or how about the top 100 from just the Applications category:http://thepiratebay.org/top/300 [thepiratebay.org]It's pretty disingenuous to say that "some of the files may not be legal", although that's a true statement.
It's much more accurate to say that "most of the files people download are not legal for distribution in most jurisdictions".
But saying it like that, and realizing that all of this technology is essentially being used by college kids to download crappy movies, sort of takes the "nobility" out of the whole thing, doesn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>debrain</author>
	<datestamp>1246373160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents. This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.</p></div><p>The concept of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willful\_blindness" title="wikipedia.org">willful blindness</a> [wikipedia.org] may apply as a substitute for intention.</p><p>Quoth the article:</p><blockquote><div><p>A famous example of such a defense being denied occurred in In re Aimster Copyright Litigation, 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003), in which the defendants argued that their file-swapping technology was designed in such a way that they had no way of monitoring the content of swapped files, and suggested that their inability to monitor the activities of users meant that they could not be contributing to copyright infringement by the users. The court held that this was willful blindness on the defendant's part, and would not constitute a defense to a claim of contributory infringement.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track , just that they connect peers , and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents .
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The concept of willful blindness [ wikipedia.org ] may apply as a substitute for intention.Quoth the article : A famous example of such a defense being denied occurred in In re Aimster Copyright Litigation , 334 F.3d 643 ( 7th Cir .
2003 ) , in which the defendants argued that their file-swapping technology was designed in such a way that they had no way of monitoring the content of swapped files , and suggested that their inability to monitor the activities of users meant that they could not be contributing to copyright infringement by the users .
The court held that this was willful blindness on the defendant 's part , and would not constitute a defense to a claim of contributory infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, the BIG change is that the tracker is going to be outsourced to a new formed company that wont know what they track, just that they connect peers, and the torrent listings will be handed by an other new company that will have torrents but they will not know either content or who is using the torrents.
This setup will be practically impossible to take down or find anyone liable to sue.The concept of willful blindness [wikipedia.org] may apply as a substitute for intention.Quoth the article:A famous example of such a defense being denied occurred in In re Aimster Copyright Litigation, 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir.
2003), in which the defendants argued that their file-swapping technology was designed in such a way that they had no way of monitoring the content of swapped files, and suggested that their inability to monitor the activities of users meant that they could not be contributing to copyright infringement by the users.
The court held that this was willful blindness on the defendant's part, and would not constitute a defense to a claim of contributory infringement.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527591</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification of sale details from "krs"</title>
	<author>zwei2stein</author>
	<datestamp>1246373460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They still have central services that could be taken down. And their 'legal' existences still depends wholly on same law avoidance schema like before.</p><p>And since they go a long way to make sure they can not be liable for providing access to copyrighted shit because they would not know it is there (which they know will be there, hence the blind services), its kinda self defeating as they prove themselves they are 'looking for trouble' and expecting material that they will be liable for, and that they want that material there.</p><p>10$ that pedoporn will appear there asap, forcing them to react with implementing ability to block certain content. I am sure RIAA can afford few machines in 3rd world do get some content up there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They still have central services that could be taken down .
And their 'legal ' existences still depends wholly on same law avoidance schema like before.And since they go a long way to make sure they can not be liable for providing access to copyrighted shit because they would not know it is there ( which they know will be there , hence the blind services ) , its kinda self defeating as they prove themselves they are 'looking for trouble ' and expecting material that they will be liable for , and that they want that material there.10 $ that pedoporn will appear there asap , forcing them to react with implementing ability to block certain content .
I am sure RIAA can afford few machines in 3rd world do get some content up there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They still have central services that could be taken down.
And their 'legal' existences still depends wholly on same law avoidance schema like before.And since they go a long way to make sure they can not be liable for providing access to copyrighted shit because they would not know it is there (which they know will be there, hence the blind services), its kinda self defeating as they prove themselves they are 'looking for trouble' and expecting material that they will be liable for, and that they want that material there.10$ that pedoporn will appear there asap, forcing them to react with implementing ability to block certain content.
I am sure RIAA can afford few machines in 3rd world do get some content up there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529353</id>
	<title>Re:How do they plan to make money?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1246380600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc)</p></div><p>[citation <i>desperately</i> needed] [especially for the "buy" part]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc ) [ citation desperately needed ] [ especially for the " buy " part ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(although studies have shown that they buy more music/films etc)[citation desperately needed] [especially for the "buy" part]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>geegel</author>
	<datestamp>1246373160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that it's just a domain, I know that something better will show up. I even know that in the great scheme of things this is actually a good thing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but somehow I can't help feeling sad. It is the end of an era. R.I.P. TPB</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that it 's just a domain , I know that something better will show up .
I even know that in the great scheme of things this is actually a good thing .
... but somehow I ca n't help feeling sad .
It is the end of an era .
R.I.P. TPB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that it's just a domain, I know that something better will show up.
I even know that in the great scheme of things this is actually a good thing.
... but somehow I can't help feeling sad.
It is the end of an era.
R.I.P. TPB</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029</id>
	<title>The Piratebay is down</title>
	<author>jonfr</author>
	<datestamp>1246375620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The piratebay is down. Given the news, I guess that is not a surprise at all. The new owners, deleting the web page. I think that the company that did buy The Piratebay was a shell company for one the RIAA/MPAA members.</p><p>ping -c 4 thepiratebay.org<br>PING thepiratebay.org (192.121.86.15) 56(84) bytes of data.</p><p>--- thepiratebay.org ping statistics ---<br>4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100\% packet loss, time 3009ms</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The piratebay is down .
Given the news , I guess that is not a surprise at all .
The new owners , deleting the web page .
I think that the company that did buy The Piratebay was a shell company for one the RIAA/MPAA members.ping -c 4 thepiratebay.orgPING thepiratebay.org ( 192.121.86.15 ) 56 ( 84 ) bytes of data.--- thepiratebay.org ping statistics ---4 packets transmitted , 0 received , 100 \ % packet loss , time 3009ms</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The piratebay is down.
Given the news, I guess that is not a surprise at all.
The new owners, deleting the web page.
I think that the company that did buy The Piratebay was a shell company for one the RIAA/MPAA members.ping -c 4 thepiratebay.orgPING thepiratebay.org (192.121.86.15) 56(84) bytes of data.--- thepiratebay.org ping statistics ---4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100\% packet loss, time 3009ms</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529611</id>
	<title>Re:suckers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sir, are not in a position to criticize our new pirate overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sir , are not in a position to criticize our new pirate overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sir, are not in a position to criticize our new pirate overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527053</id>
	<title>Supernova</title>
	<author>giorgist</author>
	<datestamp>1246371060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something will pop up in it's place. The idealists are misplaced. The rest will just find a new way, but with the lessons learned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something will pop up in it 's place .
The idealists are misplaced .
The rest will just find a new way , but with the lessons learned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something will pop up in it's place.
The idealists are misplaced.
The rest will just find a new way, but with the lessons learned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28535441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28536029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28538075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28543467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_30_1233213_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28543467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527535
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527889
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28536029
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533403
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532843
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533279
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529611
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530061
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532845
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530823
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534053
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531835
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528619
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528489
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533391
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528007
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526973
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529267
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28535441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527541
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531629
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28533919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527175
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527061
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527943
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28531843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528059
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28530901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28532025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28527711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_30_1233213.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28526981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28528883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28529353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28538075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28534373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_30_1233213.28537535
</commentlist>
</conversation>
