<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_29_1629225</id>
	<title>Comic Artist Detained For Script Containing 9/11 Type Scenarios</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1246293840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Comics writer Mark Sable was <a href="http://sfscope.com/2009/05/comics-artist-mark-sable-detai.html">detained by security at Los Angeles International Airport</a> because he was carrying a script for a new issue of his comic miniseries, <em>Unthinkable</em>. <em>Unthinkable</em> follows members of a government think tank that was tasked with coming up with 9/11-type "unthinkable" terrorist scenarios that now are coming true. Sable wrote about his experience saying, "...I was flagged at the gate for 'extra screening.' I was subjected to not one, but two invasive searches of my person and belongings. TSA agents then 'discovered' the script for <em>Unthinkable</em> #3. They sat and read the script while I stood there, without any personal items, identification or ticket, which had all been confiscated. The minute I saw the faces of the agents, I knew I was in trouble. The first page of the <em>Unthinkable</em> script mentioned 9/11, terror plots, and the fact that the (fictional) world had become a police state. The TSA agents then proceeded to interrogate me, having a hard time understanding that a comic book could be about anything other than superheroes, let alone that anyone actually wrote scripts for comics. I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation. While <em>Unthinkable</em> blurs the line between fiction and reality, the story is based on a real-life government think tank where a writer was tasked to design worst-case terror scenarios. The fictional story of Unthinkable unfolds when the writer's scenarios come true, and he becomes a suspect in the terrorist attacks." It's too bad that the TSA can't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comics writer Mark Sable was detained by security at Los Angeles International Airport because he was carrying a script for a new issue of his comic miniseries , Unthinkable .
Unthinkable follows members of a government think tank that was tasked with coming up with 9/11-type " unthinkable " terrorist scenarios that now are coming true .
Sable wrote about his experience saying , " ...I was flagged at the gate for 'extra screening .
' I was subjected to not one , but two invasive searches of my person and belongings .
TSA agents then 'discovered ' the script for Unthinkable # 3 .
They sat and read the script while I stood there , without any personal items , identification or ticket , which had all been confiscated .
The minute I saw the faces of the agents , I knew I was in trouble .
The first page of the Unthinkable script mentioned 9/11 , terror plots , and the fact that the ( fictional ) world had become a police state .
The TSA agents then proceeded to interrogate me , having a hard time understanding that a comic book could be about anything other than superheroes , let alone that anyone actually wrote scripts for comics .
I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation .
While Unthinkable blurs the line between fiction and reality , the story is based on a real-life government think tank where a writer was tasked to design worst-case terror scenarios .
The fictional story of Unthinkable unfolds when the writer 's scenarios come true , and he becomes a suspect in the terrorist attacks .
" It 's too bad that the TSA ca n't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comics writer Mark Sable was detained by security at Los Angeles International Airport because he was carrying a script for a new issue of his comic miniseries, Unthinkable.
Unthinkable follows members of a government think tank that was tasked with coming up with 9/11-type "unthinkable" terrorist scenarios that now are coming true.
Sable wrote about his experience saying, "...I was flagged at the gate for 'extra screening.
' I was subjected to not one, but two invasive searches of my person and belongings.
TSA agents then 'discovered' the script for Unthinkable #3.
They sat and read the script while I stood there, without any personal items, identification or ticket, which had all been confiscated.
The minute I saw the faces of the agents, I knew I was in trouble.
The first page of the Unthinkable script mentioned 9/11, terror plots, and the fact that the (fictional) world had become a police state.
The TSA agents then proceeded to interrogate me, having a hard time understanding that a comic book could be about anything other than superheroes, let alone that anyone actually wrote scripts for comics.
I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation.
While Unthinkable blurs the line between fiction and reality, the story is based on a real-life government think tank where a writer was tasked to design worst-case terror scenarios.
The fictional story of Unthinkable unfolds when the writer's scenarios come true, and he becomes a suspect in the terrorist attacks.
" It's too bad that the TSA can't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Dryth</author>
	<datestamp>1246307880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He was detained by the TSA, not the police.</p><p>The worst the TSA will ever do to you is call the actual police. The second worst is attempt to confiscate your belongings. The third - and the one most innocent travelers are most wary of - is they'll prevent you from boarding your flight.</p><p>For people falling into that third scenario you aren't arguing just against being detained. You don't want to wait for a lawyer, and you don't want to escalate the issue to them calling the police over. You're trying to get through TSA screening as quickly as possible so you can make your flight.</p><p>I've flown on average once a month for the past six years, and have been detained in a back room half a dozen times myself. The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ("No sir, I'm not aware," "am I being detained, or am I free to go?" "I don't have anything to say without my lawyer present."). I ended up missing my flight, missing a job interview, wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room, and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer's involvement.</p><p>Since then I've just played nice. I'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr. It's one of those "You'd be right, but you'd still lose" scenarios.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He was detained by the TSA , not the police.The worst the TSA will ever do to you is call the actual police .
The second worst is attempt to confiscate your belongings .
The third - and the one most innocent travelers are most wary of - is they 'll prevent you from boarding your flight.For people falling into that third scenario you are n't arguing just against being detained .
You do n't want to wait for a lawyer , and you do n't want to escalate the issue to them calling the police over .
You 're trying to get through TSA screening as quickly as possible so you can make your flight.I 've flown on average once a month for the past six years , and have been detained in a back room half a dozen times myself .
The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ( " No sir , I 'm not aware , " " am I being detained , or am I free to go ?
" " I do n't have anything to say without my lawyer present. " ) .
I ended up missing my flight , missing a job interview , wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room , and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer 's involvement.Since then I 've just played nice .
I 'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr .
It 's one of those " You 'd be right , but you 'd still lose " scenarios .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was detained by the TSA, not the police.The worst the TSA will ever do to you is call the actual police.
The second worst is attempt to confiscate your belongings.
The third - and the one most innocent travelers are most wary of - is they'll prevent you from boarding your flight.For people falling into that third scenario you aren't arguing just against being detained.
You don't want to wait for a lawyer, and you don't want to escalate the issue to them calling the police over.
You're trying to get through TSA screening as quickly as possible so you can make your flight.I've flown on average once a month for the past six years, and have been detained in a back room half a dozen times myself.
The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ("No sir, I'm not aware," "am I being detained, or am I free to go?
" "I don't have anything to say without my lawyer present.").
I ended up missing my flight, missing a job interview, wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room, and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer's involvement.Since then I've just played nice.
I'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr.
It's one of those "You'd be right, but you'd still lose" scenarios.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28535217</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246358700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The point is, justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient.</i> </p><p>Yeah, let's get rid of those stupid things. Who ever needed those anachronisms anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is , justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient .
Yeah , let 's get rid of those stupid things .
Who ever needed those anachronisms anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is, justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient.
Yeah, let's get rid of those stupid things.
Who ever needed those anachronisms anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516031</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Dr. Eggman</author>
	<datestamp>1246298880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the other hand, if this harsh treatment is the standard then really it makes sense from the point of view of assuming you may be dealing with a terrorist, not to buy into the irony of the situation. Not that I think it's right, or that its right to view the situation from that point of view; just that it's more reasonable that they actively disregard the possible irony than they don't understand it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , if this harsh treatment is the standard then really it makes sense from the point of view of assuming you may be dealing with a terrorist , not to buy into the irony of the situation .
Not that I think it 's right , or that its right to view the situation from that point of view ; just that it 's more reasonable that they actively disregard the possible irony than they do n't understand it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, if this harsh treatment is the standard then really it makes sense from the point of view of assuming you may be dealing with a terrorist, not to buy into the irony of the situation.
Not that I think it's right, or that its right to view the situation from that point of view; just that it's more reasonable that they actively disregard the possible irony than they don't understand it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522657</id>
	<title>Re:We finally figured out step 2</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1246283880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the words of John Cleese:</p><p>"Don't mention the WTC"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the words of John Cleese : " Do n't mention the WTC "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the words of John Cleese:"Don't mention the WTC"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28539087</id>
	<title>Re:We finally figured out step 2</title>
	<author>Bladesonfire</author>
	<datestamp>1246389240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Step 2) Get detained by TSA, spread story over<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></div><p>It's all makes sense now. The mystery of ??? has finally been solved. Now to go back to The Ultimate Question...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 2 ) Get detained by TSA , spread story over /.It 's all makes sense now .
The mystery of ? ? ?
has finally been solved .
Now to go back to The Ultimate Question.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 2) Get detained by TSA, spread story over /.It's all makes sense now.
The mystery of ???
has finally been solved.
Now to go back to The Ultimate Question...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516653</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>A. B3ttik</author>
	<datestamp>1246301340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He waived his rights when he bought the ticket and (also assuming) he read and understood the fine print.
<br> <br>
If you want to come on my property or utilize my services, I can have you comply to almost anything... including telling you to shut up and strip naked. Don't like it? You're free to leave.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He waived his rights when he bought the ticket and ( also assuming ) he read and understood the fine print .
If you want to come on my property or utilize my services , I can have you comply to almost anything... including telling you to shut up and strip naked .
Do n't like it ?
You 're free to leave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He waived his rights when he bought the ticket and (also assuming) he read and understood the fine print.
If you want to come on my property or utilize my services, I can have you comply to almost anything... including telling you to shut up and strip naked.
Don't like it?
You're free to leave.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520287</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246271640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions? If I'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent, can I request another? What recourse do I have, as a free citizen, when I am being mistreated by one of these agents?</p></div><p>You probably could walk out, just make sure its towards an exit, as you certainly wouldn't be flying anytime soon.  As a free citizen, you have the option of opting-out of the mess by not entering an airport.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions ?
If I 'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent , can I request another ?
What recourse do I have , as a free citizen , when I am being mistreated by one of these agents ? You probably could walk out , just make sure its towards an exit , as you certainly would n't be flying anytime soon .
As a free citizen , you have the option of opting-out of the mess by not entering an airport .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions?
If I'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent, can I request another?
What recourse do I have, as a free citizen, when I am being mistreated by one of these agents?You probably could walk out, just make sure its towards an exit, as you certainly wouldn't be flying anytime soon.
As a free citizen, you have the option of opting-out of the mess by not entering an airport.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1246306020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Mr. Sable's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rights</p><p>Are TSA agents technically law enforcement officers? Are they trained in due process, reasonable force, constitutional rights? What power do they actually wield? As a free citizen, I expect to be able to walk out of any room without physical altercation unless I'm under the custody of a police officer or other law enforcement agent.</p><p>What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions? If I'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent, can I request another? What recourse do I have, as a free citizen, when I am being mistreated by one of these agents?</p><p>I wish I knew more.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Mr .
Sable 's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rightsAre TSA agents technically law enforcement officers ?
Are they trained in due process , reasonable force , constitutional rights ?
What power do they actually wield ?
As a free citizen , I expect to be able to walk out of any room without physical altercation unless I 'm under the custody of a police officer or other law enforcement agent.What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions ?
If I 'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent , can I request another ?
What recourse do I have , as a free citizen , when I am being mistreated by one of these agents ? I wish I knew more.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Mr.
Sable's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rightsAre TSA agents technically law enforcement officers?
Are they trained in due process, reasonable force, constitutional rights?
What power do they actually wield?
As a free citizen, I expect to be able to walk out of any room without physical altercation unless I'm under the custody of a police officer or other law enforcement agent.What would stop a person from standing up and walking out of one of these little TSA Q&amp;A sessions?
If I'm unhappy with the behavior of a TSA agent, can I request another?
What recourse do I have, as a free citizen, when I am being mistreated by one of these agents?I wish I knew more.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28525489</id>
	<title>Re:I Can See It...</title>
	<author>Saint Fnordius</author>
	<datestamp>1246353900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see it more as "this guy is mocking me! I may not be able to do much to this asshole, but I can sure make his life miserable for a few hours!"</p><p>I think a lot of TSA employees are a little resentful of the reputation they have, and are just looking for ways to lash out (which ruins their reputation even more, and so on).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see it more as " this guy is mocking me !
I may not be able to do much to this asshole , but I can sure make his life miserable for a few hours !
" I think a lot of TSA employees are a little resentful of the reputation they have , and are just looking for ways to lash out ( which ruins their reputation even more , and so on ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see it more as "this guy is mocking me!
I may not be able to do much to this asshole, but I can sure make his life miserable for a few hours!
"I think a lot of TSA employees are a little resentful of the reputation they have, and are just looking for ways to lash out (which ruins their reputation even more, and so on).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515855</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about a Tom Clancy book, or one of the Die Hard movies?  I'll grant you that a script is a bit outside the norm, but worthy of extra scrutiny?  Give me a break.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about a Tom Clancy book , or one of the Die Hard movies ?
I 'll grant you that a script is a bit outside the norm , but worthy of extra scrutiny ?
Give me a break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about a Tom Clancy book, or one of the Die Hard movies?
I'll grant you that a script is a bit outside the norm, but worthy of extra scrutiny?
Give me a break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519171</id>
	<title>Re:We finally figured out step 2</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246267860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Step 2) spread story over<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<br>Step 3) Profit!</i> </p><p>This does not compute. Profit implies sales. Money changing hands. Not a link to a torrent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 2 ) spread story over /.Step 3 ) Profit !
This does not compute .
Profit implies sales .
Money changing hands .
Not a link to a torrent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 2) spread story over /.Step 3) Profit!
This does not compute.
Profit implies sales.
Money changing hands.
Not a link to a torrent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518517</id>
	<title>How convenient for him...</title>
	<author>Schnoogs</author>
	<datestamp>1246308720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I'm sure this will help the sale of his comic book.  I'm calling BS on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I 'm sure this will help the sale of his comic book .
I 'm calling BS on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I'm sure this will help the sale of his comic book.
I'm calling BS on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515783</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1246298040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When doing something you have a perfect right to do is "asking for it" something is very wrong.<br> <br>

Describing something that somebody has a perfect right to do as "asking for it" makes you a sniveling authoritarian bootlicker and a complicit bystander to abuse of authority.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When doing something you have a perfect right to do is " asking for it " something is very wrong .
Describing something that somebody has a perfect right to do as " asking for it " makes you a sniveling authoritarian bootlicker and a complicit bystander to abuse of authority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When doing something you have a perfect right to do is "asking for it" something is very wrong.
Describing something that somebody has a perfect right to do as "asking for it" makes you a sniveling authoritarian bootlicker and a complicit bystander to abuse of authority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515875</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1246298340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in their right mind should have to worry about that at all?</p><p>We aren't in our right minds at all if we're concerned at all about a comic book. He wasn't begging for it, we (the collective we) were begging for it to be done to him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind should have to worry about that at all ? We are n't in our right minds at all if we 're concerned at all about a comic book .
He was n't begging for it , we ( the collective we ) were begging for it to be done to him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind should have to worry about that at all?We aren't in our right minds at all if we're concerned at all about a comic book.
He wasn't begging for it, we (the collective we) were begging for it to be done to him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526397</id>
	<title>Looks like he just got a new script idea...</title>
	<author>fudgefactor7</author>
	<datestamp>1246366080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Writer detained for possessing "harmful materials" while real terrorist plans actual harm. Clueless TSA Agents FTL!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Writer detained for possessing " harmful materials " while real terrorist plans actual harm .
Clueless TSA Agents FTL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Writer detained for possessing "harmful materials" while real terrorist plans actual harm.
Clueless TSA Agents FTL!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516787</id>
	<title>Re:I Can See It...</title>
	<author>PanDuh</author>
	<datestamp>1246301820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I once had a half-full bottle of diet coke I had absent-mindedly shoved into my carry-on bag confiscated by airport security. The guy calls out to his buddies "oh snap, we got another one here!" lobs the bottle into the trash, gives me a "you've just been served. move along."-look and proceeds to laugh it up with his co-workers/frat brothers.
<p>
The least he could've done is asked if I wanted to finish my drink before I passed through security check. I felt humiliated and emasculated in front of everybody.
</p><p>
I am the farthest thing from a terrorist, but at that moment I was wishing the most terrible things to happen to those security guards.  Not only don't I feel any safer with these so-called "homeland security guards" on the job, I feel like fighting AGAINST them.  Hows that for effective homeland security?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once had a half-full bottle of diet coke I had absent-mindedly shoved into my carry-on bag confiscated by airport security .
The guy calls out to his buddies " oh snap , we got another one here !
" lobs the bottle into the trash , gives me a " you 've just been served .
move along .
" -look and proceeds to laugh it up with his co-workers/frat brothers .
The least he could 've done is asked if I wanted to finish my drink before I passed through security check .
I felt humiliated and emasculated in front of everybody .
I am the farthest thing from a terrorist , but at that moment I was wishing the most terrible things to happen to those security guards .
Not only do n't I feel any safer with these so-called " homeland security guards " on the job , I feel like fighting AGAINST them .
Hows that for effective homeland security ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once had a half-full bottle of diet coke I had absent-mindedly shoved into my carry-on bag confiscated by airport security.
The guy calls out to his buddies "oh snap, we got another one here!
" lobs the bottle into the trash, gives me a "you've just been served.
move along.
"-look and proceeds to laugh it up with his co-workers/frat brothers.
The least he could've done is asked if I wanted to finish my drink before I passed through security check.
I felt humiliated and emasculated in front of everybody.
I am the farthest thing from a terrorist, but at that moment I was wishing the most terrible things to happen to those security guards.
Not only don't I feel any safer with these so-called "homeland security guards" on the job, I feel like fighting AGAINST them.
Hows that for effective homeland security?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515861</id>
	<title>Re:Watch Closet Land</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for the movie tip!  Will give it a look.  Alan Rickman is a brilliant actor...he even died brilliantly in Die Hard.  lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the movie tip !
Will give it a look .
Alan Rickman is a brilliant actor...he even died brilliantly in Die Hard .
lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the movie tip!
Will give it a look.
Alan Rickman is a brilliant actor...he even died brilliantly in Die Hard.
lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637</id>
	<title>Proof please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened?  Otherwise I'm tempted to believe that it is a stunt to advertise his comic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened ?
Otherwise I 'm tempted to believe that it is a stunt to advertise his comic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened?
Otherwise I'm tempted to believe that it is a stunt to advertise his comic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</id>
	<title>ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>aber</author>
	<datestamp>1246299120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation." Mr. Sable's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rights caused him to perhaps waste a great opportunity to challenge TSA policies on search of personal belongings. Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?" followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking," or "I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer," as the case may be. If Mr. Sable had actually been prosecuted simply for having exercised his 1st amendment rights, his case would have had a much more significant impact in our fear-prone society, causing perhaps some much needed "clarification" of what the federal government can/cannot do "for our own good" to "protect us from the evil terrorists." Perhaps even a re-evaluation of TSA policies, or at least application of punishment to over-zealous agents.</p><p>"The minute I saw the faces of the agents, I knew I was in trouble."  You're not in trouble just because a government employee says so (or looks at you funny). We do have a bill of rights, you know.</p><p>From TFA: "In the end, I feel my privacy is a small price to pay for educating the government about the medium." No one of any importance was "educated." No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange' books, scripts, magazines, etc. All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation .
" Mr. Sable 's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rights caused him to perhaps waste a great opportunity to challenge TSA policies on search of personal belongings .
Next time , maybe a better approach would be ( disclaimer , IANAL ) : " Am I being detained ?
" followed by " I 'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking , " or " I wo n't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer , " as the case may be .
If Mr. Sable had actually been prosecuted simply for having exercised his 1st amendment rights , his case would have had a much more significant impact in our fear-prone society , causing perhaps some much needed " clarification " of what the federal government can/can not do " for our own good " to " protect us from the evil terrorists .
" Perhaps even a re-evaluation of TSA policies , or at least application of punishment to over-zealous agents .
" The minute I saw the faces of the agents , I knew I was in trouble .
" You 're not in trouble just because a government employee says so ( or looks at you funny ) .
We do have a bill of rights , you know.From TFA : " In the end , I feel my privacy is a small price to pay for educating the government about the medium .
" No one of any importance was " educated .
" No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident ; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange ' books , scripts , magazines , etc .
All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I cooperated politely and tried to explain to them the irony of the situation.
" Mr. Sable's ignorance or willful abdication of his 5th amendment rights caused him to perhaps waste a great opportunity to challenge TSA policies on search of personal belongings.
Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?
" followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking," or "I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer," as the case may be.
If Mr. Sable had actually been prosecuted simply for having exercised his 1st amendment rights, his case would have had a much more significant impact in our fear-prone society, causing perhaps some much needed "clarification" of what the federal government can/cannot do "for our own good" to "protect us from the evil terrorists.
" Perhaps even a re-evaluation of TSA policies, or at least application of punishment to over-zealous agents.
"The minute I saw the faces of the agents, I knew I was in trouble.
"  You're not in trouble just because a government employee says so (or looks at you funny).
We do have a bill of rights, you know.From TFA: "In the end, I feel my privacy is a small price to pay for educating the government about the medium.
" No one of any importance was "educated.
" No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange' books, scripts, magazines, etc.
All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516095</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1246299120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether they are smart enough or not, TSA and airport security are essentially required by law to not understand irony, humor, jest, satire, sarcasm, or the like.  Now surely the TSA officers in question, reading a script about terrorist attacks (as if such could be the topic of fiction in today's world!) and getting suspicious indicates they fall squarely in the "lack the intellect" bucket...  But in either case, trying to explain the irony would just mean they'd say "I'm sorry sir, but according to DHS regulation 372(d) paragraph 2, I'm not allowed to understand what that word means."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether they are smart enough or not , TSA and airport security are essentially required by law to not understand irony , humor , jest , satire , sarcasm , or the like .
Now surely the TSA officers in question , reading a script about terrorist attacks ( as if such could be the topic of fiction in today 's world !
) and getting suspicious indicates they fall squarely in the " lack the intellect " bucket... But in either case , trying to explain the irony would just mean they 'd say " I 'm sorry sir , but according to DHS regulation 372 ( d ) paragraph 2 , I 'm not allowed to understand what that word means .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether they are smart enough or not, TSA and airport security are essentially required by law to not understand irony, humor, jest, satire, sarcasm, or the like.
Now surely the TSA officers in question, reading a script about terrorist attacks (as if such could be the topic of fiction in today's world!
) and getting suspicious indicates they fall squarely in the "lack the intellect" bucket...  But in either case, trying to explain the irony would just mean they'd say "I'm sorry sir, but according to DHS regulation 372(d) paragraph 2, I'm not allowed to understand what that word means.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517921</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;it's not resisting arrest or assault if there's nothing to arrest you for!</p><p>Oh ho ho, Get back to us when you try that trick! Every level of our judicial system has upheld nearly every "unreasonable" search. To most of our judges, there is no such thing as 'unreasonable search'. If someone wants to search you, that's their reason right there.</p><p>I don't like it, I don't agree with it, but I'd prefer a lawyer fight my legal battles for me rather than getting into a physical fight with taser-and-mace-armed thugs.</p><p>If you've ever been tazed or maced, raise your hand. OK, now keep them up if you want to try it again.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; it 's not resisting arrest or assault if there 's nothing to arrest you for ! Oh ho ho , Get back to us when you try that trick !
Every level of our judicial system has upheld nearly every " unreasonable " search .
To most of our judges , there is no such thing as 'unreasonable search' .
If someone wants to search you , that 's their reason right there.I do n't like it , I do n't agree with it , but I 'd prefer a lawyer fight my legal battles for me rather than getting into a physical fight with taser-and-mace-armed thugs.If you 've ever been tazed or maced , raise your hand .
OK , now keep them up if you want to try it again.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;it's not resisting arrest or assault if there's nothing to arrest you for!Oh ho ho, Get back to us when you try that trick!
Every level of our judicial system has upheld nearly every "unreasonable" search.
To most of our judges, there is no such thing as 'unreasonable search'.
If someone wants to search you, that's their reason right there.I don't like it, I don't agree with it, but I'd prefer a lawyer fight my legal battles for me rather than getting into a physical fight with taser-and-mace-armed thugs.If you've ever been tazed or maced, raise your hand.
OK, now keep them up if you want to try it again.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516705</id>
	<title>Re:Bay Splosions!</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1246301520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, given his penchant for explosions, I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't someday responsible for a few stunt deaths.  He may be more dangerous than some suicide bombers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , given his penchant for explosions , I would n't be surprised if he was n't someday responsible for a few stunt deaths .
He may be more dangerous than some suicide bombers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, given his penchant for explosions, I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't someday responsible for a few stunt deaths.
He may be more dangerous than some suicide bombers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517585</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note that there's no constitutional guarantee to flying on big silver birds...  Don't want to play with TSA, then don't.  They can deny you access to said silver birds at their leasure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note that there 's no constitutional guarantee to flying on big silver birds... Do n't want to play with TSA , then do n't .
They can deny you access to said silver birds at their leasure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note that there's no constitutional guarantee to flying on big silver birds...  Don't want to play with TSA, then don't.
They can deny you access to said silver birds at their leasure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516363</id>
	<title>Economist Steven Levitt almost got arrested too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246300260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Economist Steven Levitt also had an interesting story of how he almost got arrested because he bought a last min one-way flight, and that he carried research paper on terrorist activities:
<br>
<br> <b>I almost got sent to Guantanamo</b>
<br>By Steven D. Levitt
<br>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2005/07/14/i-almost-got-sent-to-guantanamo/</htmltext>
<tokenext>Economist Steven Levitt also had an interesting story of how he almost got arrested because he bought a last min one-way flight , and that he carried research paper on terrorist activities : I almost got sent to Guantanamo By Steven D. Levitt http : //freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2005/07/14/i-almost-got-sent-to-guantanamo/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Economist Steven Levitt also had an interesting story of how he almost got arrested because he bought a last min one-way flight, and that he carried research paper on terrorist activities:

 I almost got sent to Guantanamo
By Steven D. Levitt
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2005/07/14/i-almost-got-sent-to-guantanamo/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518979</id>
	<title>TSA</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1246267140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Harassing law-abiding people since 2001.
<br> <br>
Number of terrorists caught by TSA: 0
<br>
Number of people unlawfully detained, searched, and interrogated by TSA: thousands.
<br> <br>
TSA: we purposely hire incompetent morons just to make your traveling experience a little more hellish.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Harassing law-abiding people since 2001 .
Number of terrorists caught by TSA : 0 Number of people unlawfully detained , searched , and interrogated by TSA : thousands .
TSA : we purposely hire incompetent morons just to make your traveling experience a little more hellish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Harassing law-abiding people since 2001.
Number of terrorists caught by TSA: 0

Number of people unlawfully detained, searched, and interrogated by TSA: thousands.
TSA: we purposely hire incompetent morons just to make your traveling experience a little more hellish.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516211</id>
	<title>Re:Watch Closet Land</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1246299660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tho I agree TFA sounds too much like Slashvertizement, the concept is all too real. If it could be applied to a bunch of storyboards, why not to a novel??</p><p>So... next time you fly with an espionage novel in your luggage -- could you be the courier for The Bad Guys' Secret Plans??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tho I agree TFA sounds too much like Slashvertizement , the concept is all too real .
If it could be applied to a bunch of storyboards , why not to a novel ? ? So.. .
next time you fly with an espionage novel in your luggage -- could you be the courier for The Bad Guys ' Secret Plans ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tho I agree TFA sounds too much like Slashvertizement, the concept is all too real.
If it could be applied to a bunch of storyboards, why not to a novel??So...
next time you fly with an espionage novel in your luggage -- could you be the courier for The Bad Guys' Secret Plans?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</id>
	<title>it is sad..</title>
	<author>Hillview</author>
	<datestamp>1246297680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?  Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.

In short:  He was asking for it.  No.. he was begging.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is sad that he 'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening ?
Comic book , hell.. it could 've been a movie script and he would 've received the same response .
In short : He was asking for it .
No.. he was begging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?
Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.
In short:  He was asking for it.
No.. he was begging.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520307</id>
	<title>This actually IS something of a police state...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1246271700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... when employees of the TSA are allowed to be so completely full of themselves and their imagined importance that abuses like this routinely happen.  There's nothing more malicious and mean-spirited than the BOTTOM RUNG of an authoritarian regime (like the TSA): the people on that lowest rung act out that authoritarian schtick in the worst possible way with people who are, if not completely innocent, certainly not deserving of the abuse of power.</p><p>What exactly will be the consequences of this abuse of power for the TSA employees involved?  You already know the answer, don't you?  NOTHING.  No consequences at all... unless it becomes a huge public scandal and scapegoats must be habeas-corpused.  That's a key tenet of a police state: the authorities and enforcers are not held to the same standards of behavior as those they are tasked to judge.  We see the same thing in the corporate world as well in many cases.</p><p>So yeah, this really is the early stages of a police state.  What are we gonna DO about it?  Hint: electing a smooth talker like Obama isn't doing something about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... when employees of the TSA are allowed to be so completely full of themselves and their imagined importance that abuses like this routinely happen .
There 's nothing more malicious and mean-spirited than the BOTTOM RUNG of an authoritarian regime ( like the TSA ) : the people on that lowest rung act out that authoritarian schtick in the worst possible way with people who are , if not completely innocent , certainly not deserving of the abuse of power.What exactly will be the consequences of this abuse of power for the TSA employees involved ?
You already know the answer , do n't you ?
NOTHING. No consequences at all... unless it becomes a huge public scandal and scapegoats must be habeas-corpused .
That 's a key tenet of a police state : the authorities and enforcers are not held to the same standards of behavior as those they are tasked to judge .
We see the same thing in the corporate world as well in many cases.So yeah , this really is the early stages of a police state .
What are we gon na DO about it ?
Hint : electing a smooth talker like Obama is n't doing something about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when employees of the TSA are allowed to be so completely full of themselves and their imagined importance that abuses like this routinely happen.
There's nothing more malicious and mean-spirited than the BOTTOM RUNG of an authoritarian regime (like the TSA): the people on that lowest rung act out that authoritarian schtick in the worst possible way with people who are, if not completely innocent, certainly not deserving of the abuse of power.What exactly will be the consequences of this abuse of power for the TSA employees involved?
You already know the answer, don't you?
NOTHING.  No consequences at all... unless it becomes a huge public scandal and scapegoats must be habeas-corpused.
That's a key tenet of a police state: the authorities and enforcers are not held to the same standards of behavior as those they are tasked to judge.
We see the same thing in the corporate world as well in many cases.So yeah, this really is the early stages of a police state.
What are we gonna DO about it?
Hint: electing a smooth talker like Obama isn't doing something about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517327</id>
	<title>Passing a dog on a walk?</title>
	<author>Lorien\_the\_first\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1246303860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I know.  I go on daily walks and inevitably, I pass a dog confined behind a fence all day.  The dog barks at me, as if to say, "Wait! Wait! You're the most exciting thing that's happened here all day!  Hey! Where are you going?  Come back here!"
<br> <br>
What you describe is that one man's inconvenience is another man's treasure, so to speak.  It's kind of like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I know .
I go on daily walks and inevitably , I pass a dog confined behind a fence all day .
The dog barks at me , as if to say , " Wait !
Wait ! You 're the most exciting thing that 's happened here all day !
Hey ! Where are you going ?
Come back here !
" What you describe is that one man 's inconvenience is another man 's treasure , so to speak .
It 's kind of like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I know.
I go on daily walks and inevitably, I pass a dog confined behind a fence all day.
The dog barks at me, as if to say, "Wait!
Wait! You're the most exciting thing that's happened here all day!
Hey! Where are you going?
Come back here!
"
 
What you describe is that one man's inconvenience is another man's treasure, so to speak.
It's kind of like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516597</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>SydShamino</author>
	<datestamp>1246301100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?  Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.</p><p>In short:  He was asking for it.  No.. he was begging.</p></div><p>While it is sad that she'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being raped/beaten/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would wear something like a mini skirt to a frat party? Skirt, hell.. it could've been a tight blouse and she would've received the same response.</p><p>In short: She was asking for it. No.. she was begging.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is sad that he 'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening ?
Comic book , hell.. it could 've been a movie script and he would 've received the same response.In short : He was asking for it .
No.. he was begging.While it is sad that she 'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being raped/beaten/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would wear something like a mini skirt to a frat party ?
Skirt , hell.. it could 've been a tight blouse and she would 've received the same response.In short : She was asking for it .
No.. she was begging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?
Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.In short:  He was asking for it.
No.. he was begging.While it is sad that she'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being raped/beaten/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would wear something like a mini skirt to a frat party?
Skirt, hell.. it could've been a tight blouse and she would've received the same response.In short: She was asking for it.
No.. she was begging.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697</id>
	<title>Re:Proof please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened?</i></p><p>Well, given TSA's paranoia level, his description of events certainly is <i>thinkable</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened ? Well , given TSA 's paranoia level , his description of events certainly is thinkable ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any proof that he was detained and that this happened?Well, given TSA's paranoia level, his description of events certainly is thinkable ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515911</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1246298460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who in their right mind would assume that securing an airplane would require reading a passenger's private documents?</p><p><i>He was asking for it. No.. he was begging.</i></p><p>The only people begging for it are the submissive right-wingers who worship authority.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who in their right mind would assume that securing an airplane would require reading a passenger 's private documents ? He was asking for it .
No.. he was begging.The only people begging for it are the submissive right-wingers who worship authority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who in their right mind would assume that securing an airplane would require reading a passenger's private documents?He was asking for it.
No.. he was begging.The only people begging for it are the submissive right-wingers who worship authority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516927</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246302360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Laurie Anderson did an interesting piece called "The Cultural Ambassador", which she's pulled aside by Israeli airport security for all the electronic sound equipment she has in her luggage:</p><p>"And I'd pull out something like this filter and say:  'Now this is what I'd like to think of as the Voice of Authority.' (deep, male voice)</p><p>And it would take me a while to tell them how I used it for songs that were, you know, about various forms of control, and they would say: 'Now, why would you want to talk like that?'</p><p>And I'd look around at the guards, and the undercover agents, and the dogs, and the radio in the corner, tuned to the Superbowl coverage of the war. And I'd say: 'Take a wild guess.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Laurie Anderson did an interesting piece called " The Cultural Ambassador " , which she 's pulled aside by Israeli airport security for all the electronic sound equipment she has in her luggage : " And I 'd pull out something like this filter and say : 'Now this is what I 'd like to think of as the Voice of Authority .
' ( deep , male voice ) And it would take me a while to tell them how I used it for songs that were , you know , about various forms of control , and they would say : 'Now , why would you want to talk like that ?
'And I 'd look around at the guards , and the undercover agents , and the dogs , and the radio in the corner , tuned to the Superbowl coverage of the war .
And I 'd say : 'Take a wild guess .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laurie Anderson did an interesting piece called "The Cultural Ambassador", which she's pulled aside by Israeli airport security for all the electronic sound equipment she has in her luggage:"And I'd pull out something like this filter and say:  'Now this is what I'd like to think of as the Voice of Authority.
' (deep, male voice)And it would take me a while to tell them how I used it for songs that were, you know, about various forms of control, and they would say: 'Now, why would you want to talk like that?
'And I'd look around at the guards, and the undercover agents, and the dogs, and the radio in the corner, tuned to the Superbowl coverage of the war.
And I'd say: 'Take a wild guess.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246299180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well yeah, because it's perfectly reasonable that a search for drugs, weapons, and explosives would include reading through business papers. seriously, did they think this guys journal pages were laced with ricin?  just what would be the justification for needing to read through my notebook before letting me on a plane?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well yeah , because it 's perfectly reasonable that a search for drugs , weapons , and explosives would include reading through business papers .
seriously , did they think this guys journal pages were laced with ricin ?
just what would be the justification for needing to read through my notebook before letting me on a plane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well yeah, because it's perfectly reasonable that a search for drugs, weapons, and explosives would include reading through business papers.
seriously, did they think this guys journal pages were laced with ricin?
just what would be the justification for needing to read through my notebook before letting me on a plane?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517155</id>
	<title>Re:TSA just guaranteed more sales</title>
	<author>Osurak</author>
	<datestamp>1246303200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The book was 'Debt of Honor' by Tom Clancy, in case anyone is interested. The event also factors heavily into the sequel, 'Executive Orders'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The book was 'Debt of Honor ' by Tom Clancy , in case anyone is interested .
The event also factors heavily into the sequel , 'Executive Orders' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The book was 'Debt of Honor' by Tom Clancy, in case anyone is interested.
The event also factors heavily into the sequel, 'Executive Orders'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516673</id>
	<title>keep in mind...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep in mind that these are the same folks that tried to take away a Congressional Medal of Honor 'cause its sharp and pointy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind that these are the same folks that tried to take away a Congressional Medal of Honor 'cause its sharp and pointy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind that these are the same folks that tried to take away a Congressional Medal of Honor 'cause its sharp and pointy...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521191</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>iphinome</author>
	<datestamp>1246276140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't supposed to be a search for drugs, they are not on the list of things prohibited by the FAA, illegal certianly but the TSA are not in fact law enforcement. They have the right to alert law enforcement if they see drugs the same way you are free to report illegal activity to the police but searching for them is not part of their mandate, neither is searching through someone's private papers, counting their cash, checking the photos on their digital camera...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't supposed to be a search for drugs , they are not on the list of things prohibited by the FAA , illegal certianly but the TSA are not in fact law enforcement .
They have the right to alert law enforcement if they see drugs the same way you are free to report illegal activity to the police but searching for them is not part of their mandate , neither is searching through someone 's private papers , counting their cash , checking the photos on their digital camera.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't supposed to be a search for drugs, they are not on the list of things prohibited by the FAA, illegal certianly but the TSA are not in fact law enforcement.
They have the right to alert law enforcement if they see drugs the same way you are free to report illegal activity to the police but searching for them is not part of their mandate, neither is searching through someone's private papers, counting their cash, checking the photos on their digital camera...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520051</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1246270740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called "Murder She Wrote".</i></p><p>Jessica Fletcher, you mean? Or maybe Angela Lansbury?</p><p>I always wondered why Jessica Fletcher she wasn't the prime suspect in every single episode of that show. I mean, a novelist who writes murder mysteries-- and no matter what town she visits, and no matter what event she goes to, somebody close to her ends up murdered EVERY WEEK! If I were the FBI, I'd have her face on every police station on the east coast with a big red circle around it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called " Murder She Wrote " .Jessica Fletcher , you mean ?
Or maybe Angela Lansbury ? I always wondered why Jessica Fletcher she was n't the prime suspect in every single episode of that show .
I mean , a novelist who writes murder mysteries-- and no matter what town she visits , and no matter what event she goes to , somebody close to her ends up murdered EVERY WEEK !
If I were the FBI , I 'd have her face on every police station on the east coast with a big red circle around it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called "Murder She Wrote".Jessica Fletcher, you mean?
Or maybe Angela Lansbury?I always wondered why Jessica Fletcher she wasn't the prime suspect in every single episode of that show.
I mean, a novelist who writes murder mysteries-- and no matter what town she visits, and no matter what event she goes to, somebody close to her ends up murdered EVERY WEEK!
If I were the FBI, I'd have her face on every police station on the east coast with a big red circle around it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518599</id>
	<title>Internet Tough Guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246309080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll sit in the peanut gallery at your trial for kicking and punching the cops while you were resisting arrest.  I'll bring popcorn.  You can't have any of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll sit in the peanut gallery at your trial for kicking and punching the cops while you were resisting arrest .
I 'll bring popcorn .
You ca n't have any of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll sit in the peanut gallery at your trial for kicking and punching the cops while you were resisting arrest.
I'll bring popcorn.
You can't have any of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516865</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246302120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What justification?</p><p>How about meeting your monthly detention quota for a bonus, or possibly overtime! You really think such things AREN'T in place at the TSA?</p><p>Fascism has dipped it's finger in the American pie, and it's looking for more than just a taste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What justification ? How about meeting your monthly detention quota for a bonus , or possibly overtime !
You really think such things ARE N'T in place at the TSA ? Fascism has dipped it 's finger in the American pie , and it 's looking for more than just a taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What justification?How about meeting your monthly detention quota for a bonus, or possibly overtime!
You really think such things AREN'T in place at the TSA?Fascism has dipped it's finger in the American pie, and it's looking for more than just a taste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520741</id>
	<title>The scenario could be this:</title>
	<author>autophile</author>
	<datestamp>1246273800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate security theater as much as any of us. But what if this were the scenario:

</p><p>TSA: Sorry, I need to check your bag. What's this? Hey, neat, a script! What're you writing about?

</p><p>Sable: It's a story about how people like you are humiliating innocent travelers for your own petty power trips.

</p><p>TSA:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

</p><p>I mean, I'm willing to give Mr. Sable the benefit of the doubt. I think it's unprofessional to respond to snipes and jabs. But this is the TSA we're talking about. Did he poke the bear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate security theater as much as any of us .
But what if this were the scenario : TSA : Sorry , I need to check your bag .
What 's this ?
Hey , neat , a script !
What 're you writing about ?
Sable : It 's a story about how people like you are humiliating innocent travelers for your own petty power trips .
TSA : .. . I mean , I 'm willing to give Mr. Sable the benefit of the doubt .
I think it 's unprofessional to respond to snipes and jabs .
But this is the TSA we 're talking about .
Did he poke the bear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate security theater as much as any of us.
But what if this were the scenario:

TSA: Sorry, I need to check your bag.
What's this?
Hey, neat, a script!
What're you writing about?
Sable: It's a story about how people like you are humiliating innocent travelers for your own petty power trips.
TSA: ...

I mean, I'm willing to give Mr. Sable the benefit of the doubt.
I think it's unprofessional to respond to snipes and jabs.
But this is the TSA we're talking about.
Did he poke the bear?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of the people that try to ban "1984" and "Fahrenheit 451"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the people that try to ban " 1984 " and " Fahrenheit 451 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the people that try to ban "1984" and "Fahrenheit 451"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516161</id>
	<title>Paging Ron Paul...</title>
	<author>dazedNconfuzed</author>
	<datestamp>1246299420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a recent news item (can't recall if it was<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. or FreeRepublic) noting that one of Ron Paul's people was detained by TSA for carrying $4700 cash (sales of T-shirts, stickers, etc. from a convention) and managed to record the whole incident. Sounds like Comic Book Guy needs to contact him and work on filing a joint suit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a recent news item ( ca n't recall if it was / .
or FreeRepublic ) noting that one of Ron Paul 's people was detained by TSA for carrying $ 4700 cash ( sales of T-shirts , stickers , etc .
from a convention ) and managed to record the whole incident .
Sounds like Comic Book Guy needs to contact him and work on filing a joint suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a recent news item (can't recall if it was /.
or FreeRepublic) noting that one of Ron Paul's people was detained by TSA for carrying $4700 cash (sales of T-shirts, stickers, etc.
from a convention) and managed to record the whole incident.
Sounds like Comic Book Guy needs to contact him and work on filing a joint suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517107</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246303020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?" followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking," or "I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer," as the case may be.</p></div><p>You might not get arrested, but you'd definitely get kicked out of the airport.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time , maybe a better approach would be ( disclaimer , IANAL ) : " Am I being detained ?
" followed by " I 'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking , " or " I wo n't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer , " as the case may be.You might not get arrested , but you 'd definitely get kicked out of the airport .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?
" followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking," or "I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer," as the case may be.You might not get arrested, but you'd definitely get kicked out of the airport.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</id>
	<title>Welcome to</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1246298340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime.</p><p>Thinking about it is a crime.<br>Writing about it is a crime.<br>Drawing about it is a crime.</p><p>Last I check wasn't DOING a crime... well.. a crime?</p><p>Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury  and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called "Murder She Wrote". They were so detailed! Lets not forget the Matlock, Columbo, Perry Mason, CSI, etc... All those murder plans!!! GET EM!!</p><p>"When is a man damned? When he is oblivious to it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime.Thinking about it is a crime.Writing about it is a crime.Drawing about it is a crime.Last I check was n't DOING a crime... well.. a crime ? Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called " Murder She Wrote " .
They were so detailed !
Lets not forget the Matlock , Columbo , Perry Mason , CSI , etc... All those murder plans ! ! !
GET EM ! !
" When is a man damned ?
When he is oblivious to it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime.Thinking about it is a crime.Writing about it is a crime.Drawing about it is a crime.Last I check wasn't DOING a crime... well.. a crime?Next thing you know Jessica Lansbury  and company will be held and charged for all those terroristic threats and murder plans called "Murder She Wrote".
They were so detailed!
Lets not forget the Matlock, Columbo, Perry Mason, CSI, etc... All those murder plans!!!
GET EM!!
"When is a man damned?
When he is oblivious to it.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519203</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>aber</author>
	<datestamp>1246267980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those are good questions, and I really don't have the answers. From TSA's website (http://www.tsa.gov/who\_we\_are/what\_is\_tsa.shtm):</p><p>"We are the Transportation Security Administration, formed immediately following the tragedies of Sept. 11.  Our agency is a component of the Department of Homeland Security and is responsible for security of the nation's transportation systems.</p><p>"With our state, local and regional partners, we oversee security for the highways, railroads, buses, mass transit systems, ports and the 450 U.S. airports. We employ approximately 50,000 people from Alaska to Puerto Rico to ensure your travels - by plane, train, automobile or ferry &#226;" are safe and secure."</p><p>They are definitely acting on behalf of the federal government (as part of the DHS). I am not sure what recourse you'd have if they'd denied you access to air travel.</p><p>Whether they are trained or not in constitutional issues, that is irrelevant. It's up to you to be, as a free citizen, as you put it.</p><p>Walking out of any security related situation without permission is generally a bad idea (IMHO). Always ask permission ("Am I free to go?"). You can always sue later to attempt to redress an illegal detention.</p><p>Finally, you may want to look at some of these videos, and start your search from there:<br><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8167533318153586646&amp;hl=en" title="google.com">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8167533318153586646&amp;hl=en</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/CheckpointUSA" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/user/CheckpointUSA</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are good questions , and I really do n't have the answers .
From TSA 's website ( http : //www.tsa.gov/who \ _we \ _are/what \ _is \ _tsa.shtm ) : " We are the Transportation Security Administration , formed immediately following the tragedies of Sept. 11. Our agency is a component of the Department of Homeland Security and is responsible for security of the nation 's transportation systems .
" With our state , local and regional partners , we oversee security for the highways , railroads , buses , mass transit systems , ports and the 450 U.S. airports. We employ approximately 50,000 people from Alaska to Puerto Rico to ensure your travels - by plane , train , automobile or ferry   " are safe and secure .
" They are definitely acting on behalf of the federal government ( as part of the DHS ) .
I am not sure what recourse you 'd have if they 'd denied you access to air travel.Whether they are trained or not in constitutional issues , that is irrelevant .
It 's up to you to be , as a free citizen , as you put it.Walking out of any security related situation without permission is generally a bad idea ( IMHO ) .
Always ask permission ( " Am I free to go ? " ) .
You can always sue later to attempt to redress an illegal detention.Finally , you may want to look at some of these videos , and start your search from there : http : //video.google.com/videoplay ? docid = 8167533318153586646&amp;hl = en [ google.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/user/CheckpointUSA [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are good questions, and I really don't have the answers.
From TSA's website (http://www.tsa.gov/who\_we\_are/what\_is\_tsa.shtm):"We are the Transportation Security Administration, formed immediately following the tragedies of Sept. 11.  Our agency is a component of the Department of Homeland Security and is responsible for security of the nation's transportation systems.
"With our state, local and regional partners, we oversee security for the highways, railroads, buses, mass transit systems, ports and the 450 U.S. airports. We employ approximately 50,000 people from Alaska to Puerto Rico to ensure your travels - by plane, train, automobile or ferry â" are safe and secure.
"They are definitely acting on behalf of the federal government (as part of the DHS).
I am not sure what recourse you'd have if they'd denied you access to air travel.Whether they are trained or not in constitutional issues, that is irrelevant.
It's up to you to be, as a free citizen, as you put it.Walking out of any security related situation without permission is generally a bad idea (IMHO).
Always ask permission ("Am I free to go?").
You can always sue later to attempt to redress an illegal detention.Finally, you may want to look at some of these videos, and start your search from there:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8167533318153586646&amp;hl=en [google.com]http://www.youtube.com/user/CheckpointUSA [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725</id>
	<title>NO BLOOD FOR OIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just another chapter in the corrupt fascist Bushitler's regime to destroy freedom and democracy...</p><p>oh, right. Obama. What I mean is that this is perfectly acceptable, and is all part of The One's plan for when peace shall guide the planet and love will steer the stars. Yes we can! All hail Obama!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just another chapter in the corrupt fascist Bushitler 's regime to destroy freedom and democracy...oh , right .
Obama. What I mean is that this is perfectly acceptable , and is all part of The One 's plan for when peace shall guide the planet and love will steer the stars .
Yes we can !
All hail Obama !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just another chapter in the corrupt fascist Bushitler's regime to destroy freedom and democracy...oh, right.
Obama. What I mean is that this is perfectly acceptable, and is all part of The One's plan for when peace shall guide the planet and love will steer the stars.
Yes we can!
All hail Obama!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517117</id>
	<title>Re:I Can See It...</title>
	<author>whiledo</author>
	<datestamp>1246303020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good old Comparison of Art and Terror Plans University.  Anybody know how CATPU's football program is doing lately?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good old Comparison of Art and Terror Plans University .
Anybody know how CATPU 's football program is doing lately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good old Comparison of Art and Terror Plans University.
Anybody know how CATPU's football program is doing lately?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517765</id>
	<title>Re:Slashvertisement</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246305600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it's not working.  I've read it twice, and I still don't want to buy the TSA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's not working .
I 've read it twice , and I still do n't want to buy the TSA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's not working.
I've read it twice, and I still don't want to buy the TSA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</id>
	<title>Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>painehope</author>
	<datestamp>1246299720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
So far, the larger part of the comments here have dealt with the fact that this might be a scam.
</p><p>
IMHO, it's probably not. If you've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have, this is right up their alley. Remember - these guys by and large aren't really trying to do the job they <i>say</i> they're out to do. And they're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are. I've been told before that the fact that the devil chicks I have tattooed on my forearms have some meaning in these exact words : <i>"Don't think we don't know what those horns mean! We're not stupid!"</i>. Uh, yes, you are. They're devil chicks. What, you expect them to be wearing garland wreaths on their heads? Get real. There is no hidden meaning behind that, and I know what most gang and prison-related tattoos in Texas mean.
</p><p>
If you're a chickenhawk bureaucrat on a power trip, who are you likely to pick out as a target? A comic book artist? Or someone who does have actual ties to known and dangerous terrorist organizations? Let me repeat that, just in case you missed it : <b>known and dangerous</b>. Despite all the spoon-fed drivel that gets funnelled straight into your living room, courtesy of your brand-new digital TV, these guys are bureaucrats. They don't want to break a sweat, let alone get their asses shot off or some other form of retaliation. They're not heroes, except the extremely rare exception (think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the "hero who died in the line of duty"; generally through their own stupidity, like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth, what do you think the real numbers are?). They don't go out of their way or risk their lives to protect citizens. They don't do anything other than collect their check, do as little as possible, and then go home to fuck their middle-class fat-arsed wives and scream at their subnormal children. If they can skip out on doing their "duty" for a few hours by harassing some artist whom they had to have known has no affiliation or even a tenuous connection within an hour, you bet your bottom dollar they will be doing just that for as long as they can.
</p><p>
And a cavity search? Oh, I'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me. You ain't getting my clothes off unless you've already arrested me and have me full restraints (which makes it pretty hard to get someone's clothes off without cutting them off). Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do. Oh, sure, I'll get some kind of charge slapped on me. But you know what - it's not resisting arrest or assault <i>if there's nothing to arrest you for!</i>
</p><p>
You, as a society, have become sheep. And you have chosen wolves to protect you. Is it any wonder that the herd gets culled by their so-called guardians quite often? Here's Tom with the weather...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So far , the larger part of the comments here have dealt with the fact that this might be a scam .
IMHO , it 's probably not .
If you 've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have , this is right up their alley .
Remember - these guys by and large are n't really trying to do the job they say they 're out to do .
And they 're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are .
I 've been told before that the fact that the devil chicks I have tattooed on my forearms have some meaning in these exact words : " Do n't think we do n't know what those horns mean !
We 're not stupid ! " .
Uh , yes , you are .
They 're devil chicks .
What , you expect them to be wearing garland wreaths on their heads ?
Get real .
There is no hidden meaning behind that , and I know what most gang and prison-related tattoos in Texas mean .
If you 're a chickenhawk bureaucrat on a power trip , who are you likely to pick out as a target ?
A comic book artist ?
Or someone who does have actual ties to known and dangerous terrorist organizations ?
Let me repeat that , just in case you missed it : known and dangerous .
Despite all the spoon-fed drivel that gets funnelled straight into your living room , courtesy of your brand-new digital TV , these guys are bureaucrats .
They do n't want to break a sweat , let alone get their asses shot off or some other form of retaliation .
They 're not heroes , except the extremely rare exception ( think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the " hero who died in the line of duty " ; generally through their own stupidity , like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth , what do you think the real numbers are ? ) .
They do n't go out of their way or risk their lives to protect citizens .
They do n't do anything other than collect their check , do as little as possible , and then go home to fuck their middle-class fat-arsed wives and scream at their subnormal children .
If they can skip out on doing their " duty " for a few hours by harassing some artist whom they had to have known has no affiliation or even a tenuous connection within an hour , you bet your bottom dollar they will be doing just that for as long as they can .
And a cavity search ?
Oh , I 'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me .
You ai n't getting my clothes off unless you 've already arrested me and have me full restraints ( which makes it pretty hard to get someone 's clothes off without cutting them off ) .
Because I can and will fight , and there 's only so many people that can gang up on one man , and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious , which is pretty hard to do .
Oh , sure , I 'll get some kind of charge slapped on me .
But you know what - it 's not resisting arrest or assault if there 's nothing to arrest you for !
You , as a society , have become sheep .
And you have chosen wolves to protect you .
Is it any wonder that the herd gets culled by their so-called guardians quite often ?
Here 's Tom with the weather.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
So far, the larger part of the comments here have dealt with the fact that this might be a scam.
IMHO, it's probably not.
If you've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have, this is right up their alley.
Remember - these guys by and large aren't really trying to do the job they say they're out to do.
And they're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are.
I've been told before that the fact that the devil chicks I have tattooed on my forearms have some meaning in these exact words : "Don't think we don't know what those horns mean!
We're not stupid!".
Uh, yes, you are.
They're devil chicks.
What, you expect them to be wearing garland wreaths on their heads?
Get real.
There is no hidden meaning behind that, and I know what most gang and prison-related tattoos in Texas mean.
If you're a chickenhawk bureaucrat on a power trip, who are you likely to pick out as a target?
A comic book artist?
Or someone who does have actual ties to known and dangerous terrorist organizations?
Let me repeat that, just in case you missed it : known and dangerous.
Despite all the spoon-fed drivel that gets funnelled straight into your living room, courtesy of your brand-new digital TV, these guys are bureaucrats.
They don't want to break a sweat, let alone get their asses shot off or some other form of retaliation.
They're not heroes, except the extremely rare exception (think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the "hero who died in the line of duty"; generally through their own stupidity, like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth, what do you think the real numbers are?).
They don't go out of their way or risk their lives to protect citizens.
They don't do anything other than collect their check, do as little as possible, and then go home to fuck their middle-class fat-arsed wives and scream at their subnormal children.
If they can skip out on doing their "duty" for a few hours by harassing some artist whom they had to have known has no affiliation or even a tenuous connection within an hour, you bet your bottom dollar they will be doing just that for as long as they can.
And a cavity search?
Oh, I'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me.
You ain't getting my clothes off unless you've already arrested me and have me full restraints (which makes it pretty hard to get someone's clothes off without cutting them off).
Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do.
Oh, sure, I'll get some kind of charge slapped on me.
But you know what - it's not resisting arrest or assault if there's nothing to arrest you for!
You, as a society, have become sheep.
And you have chosen wolves to protect you.
Is it any wonder that the herd gets culled by their so-called guardians quite often?
Here's Tom with the weather...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517751</id>
	<title>1st Ammendment Right!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is his first ammendment right.  We now completely ignore our heritage and founding, with our current government pushing us towards socialism.  Isn't life grand these days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is his first ammendment right .
We now completely ignore our heritage and founding , with our current government pushing us towards socialism .
Is n't life grand these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is his first ammendment right.
We now completely ignore our heritage and founding, with our current government pushing us towards socialism.
Isn't life grand these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515679</id>
	<title>Fact</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>9/11 conspiracy theories are so 2001</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>9/11 conspiracy theories are so 2001</tokentext>
<sentencetext>9/11 conspiracy theories are so 2001</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515759</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is bullshit. Why shouldn't he be allowed to carry his script with him into the airplane? Maybe he was going to a meeting about it or something. The TSA are nothing more than airport bullies, all part of the security theatre. They won't actually make you safer, they'll just make your lives a living hell, and worst of all, <strong>we let them</strong>. Your response is typical and just shows how passive the American people have become. We let these people take away our liberties, and we keep giving them more power, and eventually the USA will be a Police State. You're well on your way to helping make that happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is bullshit .
Why should n't he be allowed to carry his script with him into the airplane ?
Maybe he was going to a meeting about it or something .
The TSA are nothing more than airport bullies , all part of the security theatre .
They wo n't actually make you safer , they 'll just make your lives a living hell , and worst of all , we let them .
Your response is typical and just shows how passive the American people have become .
We let these people take away our liberties , and we keep giving them more power , and eventually the USA will be a Police State .
You 're well on your way to helping make that happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is bullshit.
Why shouldn't he be allowed to carry his script with him into the airplane?
Maybe he was going to a meeting about it or something.
The TSA are nothing more than airport bullies, all part of the security theatre.
They won't actually make you safer, they'll just make your lives a living hell, and worst of all, we let them.
Your response is typical and just shows how passive the American people have become.
We let these people take away our liberties, and we keep giving them more power, and eventually the USA will be a Police State.
You're well on your way to helping make that happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522621</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>jfreaksho</author>
	<datestamp>1246283640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slightly off-topic, but anyone in a position of protecting sheep should be considered a sheepdog.  As soon as that person violates that trust, they should be considered to be a wolf, and put down.</p><p>http://www.killology.com/sheep\_dog.htm</p><p>Col. Grossman has done quite a bit of research regarding violence and killing.  Confusing wolves and sheepdogs is common and unfortunate.<br>J.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slightly off-topic , but anyone in a position of protecting sheep should be considered a sheepdog .
As soon as that person violates that trust , they should be considered to be a wolf , and put down.http : //www.killology.com/sheep \ _dog.htmCol .
Grossman has done quite a bit of research regarding violence and killing .
Confusing wolves and sheepdogs is common and unfortunate.J .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slightly off-topic, but anyone in a position of protecting sheep should be considered a sheepdog.
As soon as that person violates that trust, they should be considered to be a wolf, and put down.http://www.killology.com/sheep\_dog.htmCol.
Grossman has done quite a bit of research regarding violence and killing.
Confusing wolves and sheepdogs is common and unfortunate.J.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517855</id>
	<title>if only he'd used his head</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He should have written them in another language so they couldnt read them..............Arabic for instance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He should have written them in another language so they couldnt read them..............Arabic for instance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should have written them in another language so they couldnt read them..............Arabic for instance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516631</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>aber</author>
	<datestamp>1246301220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.</p></div><p>That should have been "...manner WITHOUT repercussions."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.That should have been " ...manner WITHOUT repercussions .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.That should have been "...manner WITHOUT repercussions.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515999</id>
	<title>Freedom of expression</title>
	<author>oneTheory</author>
	<datestamp>1246298760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you think it should be illegal to carry a manual detailing terrorist techniques?  How the hell is anyone supposed to discuss and prevent these attack vectors if you can't talk about them or write them down?
<br> <br>
Either everything is ok to say/write down or nothing is.  You'll always find things people consider "objectionable" or "unsafe" whether they be objects, thought, or actions (such as speech).  Unless you're actually trying to incite a riot or cause violence with your words (which would have to be proven in court beyond a reasonable doubt), we should be free to express ourselves however we please...
<br> <br>
This reminds me of South Park 10.4 (Cartoon Wars II):<p><div class="quote"><p>    President Bush: Look, the fact of the matter is, the Family Guy writing staff is protected by something called the First Amendment.<br>
    Reporter 1: And what exactly is this First Amendment, Mr. President?<br>
    George W. Bush:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...you know. Right to free speech.<br>
<br>
<i>Many of the reporters groan loudly and begin yelling</i> <br>
<br>
    Reporter 2: Mr. President, when your administration came up with this First Amendment, did it not foresee a problem like this might happen?<br>
    George W. Bush: Well, we didn't come up with the First Amendment. It was already in place.<br>
    Reporter 3: What do you intend to do about this First Amendment, Mr. President?<br>
    Reporter 4: Forgive me, Mr. President, but this First Amendment sounds like a lot of bureaucratic jibbery-jroo.</p> </div><p>Damn constitution, always getting in our way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you think it should be illegal to carry a manual detailing terrorist techniques ?
How the hell is anyone supposed to discuss and prevent these attack vectors if you ca n't talk about them or write them down ?
Either everything is ok to say/write down or nothing is .
You 'll always find things people consider " objectionable " or " unsafe " whether they be objects , thought , or actions ( such as speech ) .
Unless you 're actually trying to incite a riot or cause violence with your words ( which would have to be proven in court beyond a reasonable doubt ) , we should be free to express ourselves however we please.. . This reminds me of South Park 10.4 ( Cartoon Wars II ) : President Bush : Look , the fact of the matter is , the Family Guy writing staff is protected by something called the First Amendment .
Reporter 1 : And what exactly is this First Amendment , Mr. President ? George W. Bush : ...you know .
Right to free speech .
Many of the reporters groan loudly and begin yelling Reporter 2 : Mr. President , when your administration came up with this First Amendment , did it not foresee a problem like this might happen ?
George W. Bush : Well , we did n't come up with the First Amendment .
It was already in place .
Reporter 3 : What do you intend to do about this First Amendment , Mr. President ? Reporter 4 : Forgive me , Mr. President , but this First Amendment sounds like a lot of bureaucratic jibbery-jroo .
Damn constitution , always getting in our way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you think it should be illegal to carry a manual detailing terrorist techniques?
How the hell is anyone supposed to discuss and prevent these attack vectors if you can't talk about them or write them down?
Either everything is ok to say/write down or nothing is.
You'll always find things people consider "objectionable" or "unsafe" whether they be objects, thought, or actions (such as speech).
Unless you're actually trying to incite a riot or cause violence with your words (which would have to be proven in court beyond a reasonable doubt), we should be free to express ourselves however we please...
 
This reminds me of South Park 10.4 (Cartoon Wars II):    President Bush: Look, the fact of the matter is, the Family Guy writing staff is protected by something called the First Amendment.
Reporter 1: And what exactly is this First Amendment, Mr. President?
    George W. Bush: ...you know.
Right to free speech.
Many of the reporters groan loudly and begin yelling 

    Reporter 2: Mr. President, when your administration came up with this First Amendment, did it not foresee a problem like this might happen?
George W. Bush: Well, we didn't come up with the First Amendment.
It was already in place.
Reporter 3: What do you intend to do about this First Amendment, Mr. President?
    Reporter 4: Forgive me, Mr. President, but this First Amendment sounds like a lot of bureaucratic jibbery-jroo.
Damn constitution, always getting in our way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516419</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1246300440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?  Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.</p><p>In short:  He was asking for it.  No.. he was begging.</p></div><p>So someone brings a DVD of Executive Decision through security. Are they 'asking for it?'</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is sad that he 'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening ?
Comic book , hell.. it could 've been a movie script and he would 've received the same response.In short : He was asking for it .
No.. he was begging.So someone brings a DVD of Executive Decision through security .
Are they 'asking for it ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is sad that he'd have been forced to go through the humiliation and embarassment of being questioned/searched/etc.. but honestly.. who in their right mind would carry something like a terror script through airport screening?
Comic book, hell.. it could've been a movie script and he would've received the same response.In short:  He was asking for it.
No.. he was begging.So someone brings a DVD of Executive Decision through security.
Are they 'asking for it?
'
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518441</id>
	<title>Re:Proof please.</title>
	<author>jd</author>
	<datestamp>1246308360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Paranoia level? Would that be Green-level troubleshooters, Vulture Squadron or the commie mutant traitors, friend Citizen?</p><p>Meanwhile, will all infra-red troubleshooters please report to the termination chambers as the food vats are running low.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Paranoia level ?
Would that be Green-level troubleshooters , Vulture Squadron or the commie mutant traitors , friend Citizen ? Meanwhile , will all infra-red troubleshooters please report to the termination chambers as the food vats are running low .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paranoia level?
Would that be Green-level troubleshooters, Vulture Squadron or the commie mutant traitors, friend Citizen?Meanwhile, will all infra-red troubleshooters please report to the termination chambers as the food vats are running low.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523909</id>
	<title>Condoleeza Rice was right!</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1246293660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You see? Condoleeza Rice was right - nobody could have predicted that terrorists would fly planes into buildings. Well, except the scriptwriters on "The Lone Gunmen" . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>You see ?
Condoleeza Rice was right - nobody could have predicted that terrorists would fly planes into buildings .
Well , except the scriptwriters on " The Lone Gunmen " .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You see?
Condoleeza Rice was right - nobody could have predicted that terrorists would fly planes into buildings.
Well, except the scriptwriters on "The Lone Gunmen" .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516835</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>mtrachtenberg</author>
	<datestamp>1246302000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe he actually wanted to take his flight, ya think?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he actually wanted to take his flight , ya think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he actually wanted to take his flight, ya think?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515843</id>
	<title>TSA just guaranteed more sales</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is absurd.  Tom Clancy had a "9/11" scenario in one of his books...in the early 90s.  Only, in the book, the bad guy flew the plane into the Capital...during a major event.
<br>
<br>
I don't even read comics but I'm damn sure gonna buy this series now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is absurd .
Tom Clancy had a " 9/11 " scenario in one of his books...in the early 90s .
Only , in the book , the bad guy flew the plane into the Capital...during a major event .
I do n't even read comics but I 'm damn sure gon na buy this series now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is absurd.
Tom Clancy had a "9/11" scenario in one of his books...in the early 90s.
Only, in the book, the bad guy flew the plane into the Capital...during a major event.
I don't even read comics but I'm damn sure gonna buy this series now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516167</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246299480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>apathy is MUCH more effective than bans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>apathy is MUCH more effective than bans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>apathy is MUCH more effective than bans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707</id>
	<title>We finally figured out step 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Step 1) Make graphic novel mentioning 9/11<br>
Step 2) Get detained by TSA, spread story over<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<br>
Step 3) Profit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 ) Make graphic novel mentioning 9/11 Step 2 ) Get detained by TSA , spread story over / .
Step 3 ) Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1) Make graphic novel mentioning 9/11
Step 2) Get detained by TSA, spread story over /.
Step 3) Profit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516259</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Hillview</author>
	<datestamp>1246299840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for the flamebait -mod, whoever that was =p  I was asking for it, y'know..</p><p>Seriously, it's a forum for opinions, and this one was mine.  I do see (and agree) with the viewpoint of the responses my post generated.  But, this is our current state of affairs, that was my point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the flamebait -mod , whoever that was = p I was asking for it , y'know..Seriously , it 's a forum for opinions , and this one was mine .
I do see ( and agree ) with the viewpoint of the responses my post generated .
But , this is our current state of affairs , that was my point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the flamebait -mod, whoever that was =p  I was asking for it, y'know..Seriously, it's a forum for opinions, and this one was mine.
I do see (and agree) with the viewpoint of the responses my post generated.
But, this is our current state of affairs, that was my point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517055</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246302780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL!!
<br> <br>
More NY police are shot and killed on the job each year than there are perpetrators killed by cops.
<br>
<a href="http://www.theppsc.org/Staff\_Views/Aveni/OIS.pdf" title="theppsc.org">http://www.theppsc.org/Staff\_Views/Aveni/OIS.pdf</a> [theppsc.org]
<br>
<br>
But don't let the truth stop you from being a retardedly hateful and paranoid of "THE MAN," thinking you're the only intelligent guy in America, even though 70\% of the populace feels exactly the same way you do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL ! !
More NY police are shot and killed on the job each year than there are perpetrators killed by cops .
http : //www.theppsc.org/Staff \ _Views/Aveni/OIS.pdf [ theppsc.org ] But do n't let the truth stop you from being a retardedly hateful and paranoid of " THE MAN , " thinking you 're the only intelligent guy in America , even though 70 \ % of the populace feels exactly the same way you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL!!
More NY police are shot and killed on the job each year than there are perpetrators killed by cops.
http://www.theppsc.org/Staff\_Views/Aveni/OIS.pdf [theppsc.org]


But don't let the truth stop you from being a retardedly hateful and paranoid of "THE MAN," thinking you're the only intelligent guy in America, even though 70\% of the populace feels exactly the same way you do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515785</id>
	<title>Bay Splosions!</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246298040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's too bad that the TSA can't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels.</p></div><p>Personally I think they should stop Michael Bay from boarding any plane after seeing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRS90V8BQGo" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">how disturbingly obsessed the man is with explosions</a> [youtube.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's too bad that the TSA ca n't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels.Personally I think they should stop Michael Bay from boarding any plane after seeing how disturbingly obsessed the man is with explosions [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's too bad that the TSA can't protect us from summer blockbuster movies and not just graphic novels.Personally I think they should stop Michael Bay from boarding any plane after seeing how disturbingly obsessed the man is with explosions [youtube.com].
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28524255</id>
	<title>Re:Watch Closet Land</title>
	<author>markimusk</author>
	<datestamp>1246296840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, just looked it up Amazon.ca, not available on DVD, and the only seller right now wants $99.99USD for the VHS version...</p><p>I love good movies I've never heard of before but that's too steep for my blood...</p><p>But thanks for the suggestion, I will 'bide my time...', it took a while for Lady Jane and Flesh &amp; blood to come out on DVD as well... I'm glad I waited as I saw some people paying ridiculous prices for those too...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , just looked it up Amazon.ca , not available on DVD , and the only seller right now wants $ 99.99USD for the VHS version...I love good movies I 've never heard of before but that 's too steep for my blood...But thanks for the suggestion , I will 'bide my time... ' , it took a while for Lady Jane and Flesh &amp; blood to come out on DVD as well... I 'm glad I waited as I saw some people paying ridiculous prices for those too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, just looked it up Amazon.ca, not available on DVD, and the only seller right now wants $99.99USD for the VHS version...I love good movies I've never heard of before but that's too steep for my blood...But thanks for the suggestion, I will 'bide my time...', it took a while for Lady Jane and Flesh &amp; blood to come out on DVD as well... I'm glad I waited as I saw some people paying ridiculous prices for those too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515717</id>
	<title>Re:Proof please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246297860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if false, what does that say about society today if this is even believable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if false , what does that say about society today if this is even believable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if false, what does that say about society today if this is even believable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518905</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Speck'sBacon</author>
	<datestamp>1246266840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right... because left-wingers (*coughSovietscough*) are <i>never</i> authoritarian.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right... because left-wingers ( * coughSovietscough * ) are never authoritarian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right... because left-wingers (*coughSovietscough*) are never authoritarian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518481</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>wakingrufus</author>
	<datestamp>1246308540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>1984:
Challenged in the Jackson County, FL (1981) because Orwell's novel is "pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter." Source: 2004 Banned Books Resource Guide by Robert P. Doyle.


thats all i could dig up on those two particular titles</htmltext>
<tokenext>1984 : Challenged in the Jackson County , FL ( 1981 ) because Orwell 's novel is " pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter .
" Source : 2004 Banned Books Resource Guide by Robert P. Doyle . thats all i could dig up on those two particular titles</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1984:
Challenged in the Jackson County, FL (1981) because Orwell's novel is "pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter.
" Source: 2004 Banned Books Resource Guide by Robert P. Doyle.


thats all i could dig up on those two particular titles</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517347</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Seraphim\_72</author>
	<datestamp>1246303920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really? At what point was he free to leave?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
At what point was he free to leave ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
At what point was he free to leave?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526185</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246363860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps they will understand and to prove it will tell you about how it rained... on their wedding day!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they will understand and to prove it will tell you about how it rained... on their wedding day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they will understand and to prove it will tell you about how it rained... on their wedding day!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518823</id>
	<title>Re:That the guy's an idiot?</title>
	<author>jmcvetta</author>
	<datestamp>1246266540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You realize that plenty of (civilian) members of the national security establishment might also carry such papers.  Would you also have them detained by airport security?  How about a writer with a script describing Dr Horrific's new Super-Mega-Ultra Bomb(tm), with which he plans to <i>destroy the world!!</i>  Should he be detained for carrying that, too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You realize that plenty of ( civilian ) members of the national security establishment might also carry such papers .
Would you also have them detained by airport security ?
How about a writer with a script describing Dr Horrific 's new Super-Mega-Ultra Bomb ( tm ) , with which he plans to destroy the world ! !
Should he be detained for carrying that , too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You realize that plenty of (civilian) members of the national security establishment might also carry such papers.
Would you also have them detained by airport security?
How about a writer with a script describing Dr Horrific's new Super-Mega-Ultra Bomb(tm), with which he plans to destroy the world!!
Should he be detained for carrying that, too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515945</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>SOOPRcow</author>
	<datestamp>1246298580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, the really sad part is that people like you except the notion that he got what he was asking for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the really sad part is that people like you except the notion that he got what he was asking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the really sad part is that people like you except the notion that he got what he was asking for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28529711</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246381680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation."</p><p>Because we don't have any choice.  We're always outnumbered by sheepizens who already sold out their liberty for false assurances of safety.  Our only option is to spend eight years and a million bucks losing in the Supreme Court, where Reagan/Bush/Bush appointees have suspended the Constitution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation .
" Because we do n't have any choice .
We 're always outnumbered by sheepizens who already sold out their liberty for false assurances of safety .
Our only option is to spend eight years and a million bucks losing in the Supreme Court , where Reagan/Bush/Bush appointees have suspended the Constitution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation.
"Because we don't have any choice.
We're always outnumbered by sheepizens who already sold out their liberty for false assurances of safety.
Our only option is to spend eight years and a million bucks losing in the Supreme Court, where Reagan/Bush/Bush appointees have suspended the Constitution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519729</id>
	<title>face it.  when you fly now, you're a suspect.</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1246269600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you are suspicious until proven  harmless... THIS TIME.  so you need to get on www.tsa.gov and find out what raises their neck hairs before you pack.  anything you bring is subject to search.</p><p>could be worse.  for over 30 years, you fly on El Al, it's a total hand search of everything, in the line.  of course, the Israleis have reason to be that paranoid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you are suspicious until proven harmless... THIS TIME .
so you need to get on www.tsa.gov and find out what raises their neck hairs before you pack .
anything you bring is subject to search.could be worse .
for over 30 years , you fly on El Al , it 's a total hand search of everything , in the line .
of course , the Israleis have reason to be that paranoid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you are suspicious until proven  harmless... THIS TIME.
so you need to get on www.tsa.gov and find out what raises their neck hairs before you pack.
anything you bring is subject to search.could be worse.
for over 30 years, you fly on El Al, it's a total hand search of everything, in the line.
of course, the Israleis have reason to be that paranoid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516263</id>
	<title>Re:Die Hard</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1246299840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They tricked him (dropped him early or whatever).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They tricked him ( dropped him early or whatever ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They tricked him (dropped him early or whatever).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518377</id>
	<title>Yet Another Unverified TSA Horror Story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246308060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<strong>
Here's another unverified TSA horror story that made the rounds on the Internet last year.
I first found the story on the L.A. Times website, and it was just copied from there a hundred times.
Nobody's come up with any news report or documents from the timeframe when the incident was supposed to have taken place:
</strong>
</p><p>


<em>Zimerman has had problems in the United States in recent years. He travels with his own Steinway piano, which he has altered himself. But shortly after 9/11, the instrument was confiscated at JFK Airport when he landed in New York to give a recital at Carnegie Hall. "Thinking the glue smelled funny, the TSA decided to take no chances and destroyed the instrument."
</em></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's another unverified TSA horror story that made the rounds on the Internet last year .
I first found the story on the L.A. Times website , and it was just copied from there a hundred times .
Nobody 's come up with any news report or documents from the timeframe when the incident was supposed to have taken place : Zimerman has had problems in the United States in recent years .
He travels with his own Steinway piano , which he has altered himself .
But shortly after 9/11 , the instrument was confiscated at JFK Airport when he landed in New York to give a recital at Carnegie Hall .
" Thinking the glue smelled funny , the TSA decided to take no chances and destroyed the instrument .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Here's another unverified TSA horror story that made the rounds on the Internet last year.
I first found the story on the L.A. Times website, and it was just copied from there a hundred times.
Nobody's come up with any news report or documents from the timeframe when the incident was supposed to have taken place:




Zimerman has had problems in the United States in recent years.
He travels with his own Steinway piano, which he has altered himself.
But shortly after 9/11, the instrument was confiscated at JFK Airport when he landed in New York to give a recital at Carnegie Hall.
"Thinking the glue smelled funny, the TSA decided to take no chances and destroyed the instrument.
"
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516139</id>
	<title>Wait a minute...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246299300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to ask: what led him to be flagged in the first place?  Why did they search him twice and THEN find the script?  Could this be "free publicity by TSA"?  I think I'll patent it.<br>Step 1: write obscure work that might never see the light of day<br>Step 2: do something on purpose to draw suspicion of TSA and get handled in a way I can complain about<br>Step 3: complain to Slashdot<br>Step 4: profit! (and publicity)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to ask : what led him to be flagged in the first place ?
Why did they search him twice and THEN find the script ?
Could this be " free publicity by TSA " ?
I think I 'll patent it.Step 1 : write obscure work that might never see the light of dayStep 2 : do something on purpose to draw suspicion of TSA and get handled in a way I can complain aboutStep 3 : complain to SlashdotStep 4 : profit !
( and publicity )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to ask: what led him to be flagged in the first place?
Why did they search him twice and THEN find the script?
Could this be "free publicity by TSA"?
I think I'll patent it.Step 1: write obscure work that might never see the light of dayStep 2: do something on purpose to draw suspicion of TSA and get handled in a way I can complain aboutStep 3: complain to SlashdotStep 4: profit!
(and publicity)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518703</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to</title>
	<author>Elshar</author>
	<datestamp>1246266180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I agree that he shouldn't have been held (if he indeed has been).</p><p>But, intent to commit a crime is in itself a criminal act. I'm sure most states have their own laws, but there's a federal law (United States Code TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE + PART I - CRIMES  # CHAPTER 19 - CONSPIRACY) which conveniently covers "thought crime".</p><p>You can be held, arrested, and even found guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime which you haven't committed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I agree that he should n't have been held ( if he indeed has been ) .But , intent to commit a crime is in itself a criminal act .
I 'm sure most states have their own laws , but there 's a federal law ( United States Code TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE + PART I - CRIMES # CHAPTER 19 - CONSPIRACY ) which conveniently covers " thought crime " .You can be held , arrested , and even found guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime which you have n't committed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I agree that he shouldn't have been held (if he indeed has been).But, intent to commit a crime is in itself a criminal act.
I'm sure most states have their own laws, but there's a federal law (United States Code TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE + PART I - CRIMES  # CHAPTER 19 - CONSPIRACY) which conveniently covers "thought crime".You can be held, arrested, and even found guilty of conspiracy to commit a crime which you haven't committed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516895</id>
	<title>Re:NO BLOOD FOR OIL</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1246302240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any Idiot can see that Both Side are just about equal when it comes to grabbing at power no mater the cost of freedom that the citizens must endure.   Bush and the Republican congress passed the Patriot Act, most lawmakers didn't even read it. It was passed under the guise of protection from terr-ists.    Obama has pushed Cap and Trade through which will lead to even more control over our lives using the issue of Environmentally conscious energy use.  Wiretaps on the phones and your internet connection, Monitors on your power, water and gas meters.<br>.<br>Welcome to 1984 brought to you by the best of intentions by both the Democrap and Re-pube-ican parties!<br>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any Idiot can see that Both Side are just about equal when it comes to grabbing at power no mater the cost of freedom that the citizens must endure .
Bush and the Republican congress passed the Patriot Act , most lawmakers did n't even read it .
It was passed under the guise of protection from terr-ists .
Obama has pushed Cap and Trade through which will lead to even more control over our lives using the issue of Environmentally conscious energy use .
Wiretaps on the phones and your internet connection , Monitors on your power , water and gas meters..Welcome to 1984 brought to you by the best of intentions by both the Democrap and Re-pube-ican parties ! .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any Idiot can see that Both Side are just about equal when it comes to grabbing at power no mater the cost of freedom that the citizens must endure.
Bush and the Republican congress passed the Patriot Act, most lawmakers didn't even read it.
It was passed under the guise of protection from terr-ists.
Obama has pushed Cap and Trade through which will lead to even more control over our lives using the issue of Environmentally conscious energy use.
Wiretaps on the phones and your internet connection, Monitors on your power, water and gas meters..Welcome to 1984 brought to you by the best of intentions by both the Democrap and Re-pube-ican parties!.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28524223</id>
	<title>Idiot</title>
	<author>xous</author>
	<datestamp>1246296600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree that the TSA completely screwed this up.</p><p>The author is an idiot for bringing that kind of material along with him.</p><p>When traveling by air, which I do only when it's absolutely required, I ship my luggage ahead of time to my hotel.</p><p>All I carry with me is my wallet, passport, and keys.</p><p>My cellphone, pocket knife, and media player all stay at home where they can't be stolen, searched, or "lost".</p><p>Do I think it's reasonable to have to do this? Hell, no.<br>Do I think it's worth not being hassled? Hell, yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree that the TSA completely screwed this up.The author is an idiot for bringing that kind of material along with him.When traveling by air , which I do only when it 's absolutely required , I ship my luggage ahead of time to my hotel.All I carry with me is my wallet , passport , and keys.My cellphone , pocket knife , and media player all stay at home where they ca n't be stolen , searched , or " lost " .Do I think it 's reasonable to have to do this ?
Hell , no.Do I think it 's worth not being hassled ?
Hell , yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree that the TSA completely screwed this up.The author is an idiot for bringing that kind of material along with him.When traveling by air, which I do only when it's absolutely required, I ship my luggage ahead of time to my hotel.All I carry with me is my wallet, passport, and keys.My cellphone, pocket knife, and media player all stay at home where they can't be stolen, searched, or "lost".Do I think it's reasonable to have to do this?
Hell, no.Do I think it's worth not being hassled?
Hell, yes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</id>
	<title>Bad move</title>
	<author>oneirophrenos</author>
	<datestamp>1246297680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never try to explain an authority the "irony of the situation". Chances are they will lack the intellect to understand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never try to explain an authority the " irony of the situation " .
Chances are they will lack the intellect to understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never try to explain an authority the "irony of the situation".
Chances are they will lack the intellect to understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518621</id>
	<title>Perhaps we should blow up airports...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246309140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you know, in retaliation for false charges of trying to blow up planes or fly them into buildings?</p><p>Think about it.</p><p>You are being detained.</p><p>You are not charged with a crime.</p><p><b>You are free to go.</b></p><p>Therefore, it is perfectly reasonable to use any force necessary to secure your <b>freedom to go</b>, including blowing up the airport... er the part you're not in... like maybe by remotely detonating the ANFO in the trunk of your parked car <b>by not making the cell phone call to stop it</b>.</p><p>Pity about the collateral damage, of course. Innocents getting killed and all. But, really, people should expect that sort of thing when they go somewhere where people are detained illegally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you know , in retaliation for false charges of trying to blow up planes or fly them into buildings ? Think about it.You are being detained.You are not charged with a crime.You are free to go.Therefore , it is perfectly reasonable to use any force necessary to secure your freedom to go , including blowing up the airport... er the part you 're not in... like maybe by remotely detonating the ANFO in the trunk of your parked car by not making the cell phone call to stop it.Pity about the collateral damage , of course .
Innocents getting killed and all .
But , really , people should expect that sort of thing when they go somewhere where people are detained illegally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you know, in retaliation for false charges of trying to blow up planes or fly them into buildings?Think about it.You are being detained.You are not charged with a crime.You are free to go.Therefore, it is perfectly reasonable to use any force necessary to secure your freedom to go, including blowing up the airport... er the part you're not in... like maybe by remotely detonating the ANFO in the trunk of your parked car by not making the cell phone call to stop it.Pity about the collateral damage, of course.
Innocents getting killed and all.
But, really, people should expect that sort of thing when they go somewhere where people are detained illegally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516905</id>
	<title>Why is everyone suprised?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246302240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Airport security workers work for about U.S. $ 7.50 per hour.</p><p>You pay for what you get: amateurs.</p><p>Yours In Communism,<br>K. Trout, PatRIOT</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Airport security workers work for about U.S. $ 7.50 per hour.You pay for what you get : amateurs.Yours In Communism,K .
Trout , PatRIOT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Airport security workers work for about U.S. $ 7.50 per hour.You pay for what you get: amateurs.Yours In Communism,K.
Trout, PatRIOT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699</id>
	<title>Watch Closet Land</title>
	<author>flatulus</author>
	<datestamp>1246297860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 1991 movie "Closet Land", starring Madeleine Stowe and Alan Rickman paints a horrifying picture of just how far a government might go in tracking literary "subversives".  Sounds like mr. comic book writer is a lot more "at risk" than the childrens' book author in this movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 1991 movie " Closet Land " , starring Madeleine Stowe and Alan Rickman paints a horrifying picture of just how far a government might go in tracking literary " subversives " .
Sounds like mr. comic book writer is a lot more " at risk " than the childrens ' book author in this movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 1991 movie "Closet Land", starring Madeleine Stowe and Alan Rickman paints a horrifying picture of just how far a government might go in tracking literary "subversives".
Sounds like mr. comic book writer is a lot more "at risk" than the childrens' book author in this movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>AndersOSU</author>
	<datestamp>1246298520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who tried to ban those novels?  Was it notable, or some overzealous high school librarian?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who tried to ban those novels ?
Was it notable , or some overzealous high school librarian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who tried to ban those novels?
Was it notable, or some overzealous high school librarian?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516651</id>
	<title>Re:NO BLOOD FOR OIL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What an idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517895</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1246306200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And (at the risk of being called a sheep) you would achieve.... what exactly?</p><p>How would your employer react to you mysteriously not turning up to work one day?  And learning - maybe several days later - that it was because you were being held pending some charge or other?  It may be completely trumped up but unless you live in an area with very strong employment laws, you may well find yourself out of work in fairly short order.</p><p>How would your mortgage company react to your heroism?  When the result is "ah yes.... about those repayments..."</p><p>This is why fools will try and talk their way out of it, and wise men will take legal advice (which may well be "Sit down.  Shut up.").</p><p>Complete morons and those with nothing to lose will literally scream blue murder.  Everyone else will try to keep their heads down in the hope that they can get out and get on with their lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And ( at the risk of being called a sheep ) you would achieve.... what exactly ? How would your employer react to you mysteriously not turning up to work one day ?
And learning - maybe several days later - that it was because you were being held pending some charge or other ?
It may be completely trumped up but unless you live in an area with very strong employment laws , you may well find yourself out of work in fairly short order.How would your mortgage company react to your heroism ?
When the result is " ah yes.... about those repayments... " This is why fools will try and talk their way out of it , and wise men will take legal advice ( which may well be " Sit down .
Shut up .
" ) .Complete morons and those with nothing to lose will literally scream blue murder .
Everyone else will try to keep their heads down in the hope that they can get out and get on with their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And (at the risk of being called a sheep) you would achieve.... what exactly?How would your employer react to you mysteriously not turning up to work one day?
And learning - maybe several days later - that it was because you were being held pending some charge or other?
It may be completely trumped up but unless you live in an area with very strong employment laws, you may well find yourself out of work in fairly short order.How would your mortgage company react to your heroism?
When the result is "ah yes.... about those repayments..."This is why fools will try and talk their way out of it, and wise men will take legal advice (which may well be "Sit down.
Shut up.
").Complete morons and those with nothing to lose will literally scream blue murder.
Everyone else will try to keep their heads down in the hope that they can get out and get on with their lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515937</id>
	<title>It's not sad.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The guy was a moron.  He paid a price of inconvenience. He wasn't harmed and he was on his way.</p><p>Christ all mighty.  Americans have no idea what persecution really is... so they have to invent it.</p><p>What a bunch of pussies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy was a moron .
He paid a price of inconvenience .
He was n't harmed and he was on his way.Christ all mighty .
Americans have no idea what persecution really is... so they have to invent it.What a bunch of pussies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy was a moron.
He paid a price of inconvenience.
He wasn't harmed and he was on his way.Christ all mighty.
Americans have no idea what persecution really is... so they have to invent it.What a bunch of pussies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523149</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Sabriel</author>
	<datestamp>1246287300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ("No sir, I'm not aware," "am I being detained, or am I free to go?" "I don't have anything to say without my lawyer present."). I ended up missing my flight, missing a job interview, wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room, and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer's involvement.</p><p>Since then I've just played nice. I'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr. It's one of those "You'd be right, but you'd still lose" scenarios.</p></div><p>I wonder: if enough people did every time what you did only once - exercise your rights - how quickly would the security theatre grind to a halt?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ( " No sir , I 'm not aware , " " am I being detained , or am I free to go ?
" " I do n't have anything to say without my lawyer present. " ) .
I ended up missing my flight , missing a job interview , wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room , and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer 's involvement.Since then I 've just played nice .
I 'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr .
It 's one of those " You 'd be right , but you 'd still lose " scenarios.I wonder : if enough people did every time what you did only once - exercise your rights - how quickly would the security theatre grind to a halt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first time it happened I treated it like a police encounter ("No sir, I'm not aware," "am I being detained, or am I free to go?
" "I don't have anything to say without my lawyer present.").
I ended up missing my flight, missing a job interview, wasting a few hours in a security checkpoint waiting room, and getting nothing back in return - even with my lawyer's involvement.Since then I've just played nice.
I'm more interested in getting to my destination than being a martyr.
It's one of those "You'd be right, but you'd still lose" scenarios.I wonder: if enough people did every time what you did only once - exercise your rights - how quickly would the security theatre grind to a halt?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517541</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>ckaminski</author>
	<datestamp>1246304580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 Ass-kicking.  Well spoken.</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 Ass-kicking .
Well spoken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 Ass-kicking.
Well spoken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521379</id>
	<title>there are Pretenders among us</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1246277160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Narrator:</b> There are Pretenders among us.</p><p><b>Jarod:</b> I was taken from my family<br>[a child genius]<br><b>Young Sydney:</b> Thirty-six hours and he's already demonstrating more talent than any of our others.<br>[exploited by the Centre]<br><b>Jarod:</b> <i>How many people died because of what I thought up?</i><br><b>Jarod:</b> Since I broke out...<br>[escaped]<br><b>Jarod:</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I've spent every moment searching for my past.<br>[title logo:] [the pretender]<br><b>Miss Parker:</b> He's a Pretender, a genius who can become anyone that he wants to be.<br><b>Sydney:</b> The Centre wants him <em>alive</em>.<br><b>Miss Parker:</b> "Preferably".<br><b>Miss Parker:</b> He defends the weak and abused....<br><b>Jarod:</b> Life's a gift.</p><p><b>Hospital patient:</b> Are you a doctor?<br><b>Jarod:</b> I am today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Narrator : There are Pretenders among us.Jarod : I was taken from my family [ a child genius ] Young Sydney : Thirty-six hours and he 's already demonstrating more talent than any of our others .
[ exploited by the Centre ] Jarod : How many people died because of what I thought up ? Jarod : Since I broke out... [ escaped ] Jarod : ...I 've spent every moment searching for my past .
[ title logo : ] [ the pretender ] Miss Parker : He 's a Pretender , a genius who can become anyone that he wants to be.Sydney : The Centre wants him alive.Miss Parker : " Preferably " .Miss Parker : He defends the weak and abused....Jarod : Life 's a gift.Hospital patient : Are you a doctor ? Jarod : I am today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Narrator: There are Pretenders among us.Jarod: I was taken from my family[a child genius]Young Sydney: Thirty-six hours and he's already demonstrating more talent than any of our others.
[exploited by the Centre]Jarod: How many people died because of what I thought up?Jarod: Since I broke out...[escaped]Jarod: ...I've spent every moment searching for my past.
[title logo:] [the pretender]Miss Parker: He's a Pretender, a genius who can become anyone that he wants to be.Sydney: The Centre wants him alive.Miss Parker: "Preferably".Miss Parker: He defends the weak and abused....Jarod: Life's a gift.Hospital patient: Are you a doctor?Jarod: I am today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518415</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>kneemoe</author>
	<datestamp>1246308240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"But you know what - it's not resisting arrest or assault if there's nothing to arrest you for!"
<p>
Actually (IANAL) - <a href="http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Client.lawarea/categoryid/144" title="lawinfo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Client.lawarea/categoryid/144</a> [lawinfo.com] </p><p>

What do I do if I am arrested?
</p><p>
If you are arrested, submit to the law enforcement officer.  Do not resist, even if you are innocent.  Your innocence does not make the arrest illegal as long as the officer has conformed to the requirements of a legal arrest.  If you resist, even if you are innocent of the charges for which you are arrested, you could be charged with resisting arrest.  If the officer does not conform to the requirements of a legal arrest, you should still allow yourself to be taken into custody without resistance.  If this happens, you may be entitled to bring an action against the law enforcement officer for false arrest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" But you know what - it 's not resisting arrest or assault if there 's nothing to arrest you for !
" Actually ( IANAL ) - http : //www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Client.lawarea/categoryid/144 [ lawinfo.com ] What do I do if I am arrested ?
If you are arrested , submit to the law enforcement officer .
Do not resist , even if you are innocent .
Your innocence does not make the arrest illegal as long as the officer has conformed to the requirements of a legal arrest .
If you resist , even if you are innocent of the charges for which you are arrested , you could be charged with resisting arrest .
If the officer does not conform to the requirements of a legal arrest , you should still allow yourself to be taken into custody without resistance .
If this happens , you may be entitled to bring an action against the law enforcement officer for false arrest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But you know what - it's not resisting arrest or assault if there's nothing to arrest you for!
"

Actually (IANAL) - http://www.lawinfo.com/fuseaction/Client.lawarea/categoryid/144 [lawinfo.com] 

What do I do if I am arrested?
If you are arrested, submit to the law enforcement officer.
Do not resist, even if you are innocent.
Your innocence does not make the arrest illegal as long as the officer has conformed to the requirements of a legal arrest.
If you resist, even if you are innocent of the charges for which you are arrested, you could be charged with resisting arrest.
If the officer does not conform to the requirements of a legal arrest, you should still allow yourself to be taken into custody without resistance.
If this happens, you may be entitled to bring an action against the law enforcement officer for false arrest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522437</id>
	<title>Reminds me of another story...</title>
	<author>aclarke</author>
	<datestamp>1246282560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a similar experience when I was in high school.  We lived in Zambia and I went to an American curriculum boarding school in Kenya.  At the end of my school break, I went for what was supposed to be a 4 day backpacking trip by myself.  The first night, I was accosted at my campsite by two drunk guys claiming to be police.  After harassing them for a while (remember that I was young, cocky and naive) I asked to see their paperwork if they were actually police officers.  Sure enough they were, and next thing I knew I was under arrest.  They went through my belongings and saw that I had a camera with no film.  They claimed I was a South African spy who was coming to take photos of a microwave station 4km away.  They said I'd thrown away the film when I saw them coming.  I tried to explain that the camera was broken and was my only clock, but they didn't believe me.
<br> <br>
They took me to their commanding officer, who had no idea what to do with a 17 year old Canadian in the middle of nowhere in Zambia.  He went through my belongings again, and discovered documentation explaining how quickly armies can move through a country, how far airplanes can do an airstrike, how many tanks it takes to overrun a batallion of soldiers, etc.  I had been planning my war simulation video game for next term's computer science project and had all the paperwork with me.  This was 1991 so the police officer had never seen, let alone used, a computer, so any explanation went completely over his head.  My explanation about how if the South African government wanted photos of their stupid satellite dishes they'd just take them FROM a satellite went similarly over their head but did serve to prove to them that I was probably a spy since I knew so much about this sort of thing.
<br> <br>
I was then shipped back to Lusaka, the capital city and thrown in jail.  The jail consisted of 3 rooms.  Two were crammed so full of people that there was not even space against the wall for everyone.  The third was used as a toilet.  There was no food or water provided, and no phone call allowed, so if nobody knew you were there and you didn't make friends you were in big trouble.  Fortunately I had several days' worth of food with me in my backpack so I shared that around and made lots of friends.
<br> <br>
Around 10:30 the next morning I was summoned again in front of some more important-looking people.  They went through my belongings again, and grilled me for a long time about my "secret documents" and the extra damaging evidence of a filmless camera.
<br> <br>
Fortunately, eventually common sense prevailed and they decided that a 17 year old Canadian was unlikely to be travelling alone through the bush to take pictures of some random satellite dishes for the South African government.  They let me call someone up and sent me away.
<br> <br>
My life these days is decidedly less exciting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a similar experience when I was in high school .
We lived in Zambia and I went to an American curriculum boarding school in Kenya .
At the end of my school break , I went for what was supposed to be a 4 day backpacking trip by myself .
The first night , I was accosted at my campsite by two drunk guys claiming to be police .
After harassing them for a while ( remember that I was young , cocky and naive ) I asked to see their paperwork if they were actually police officers .
Sure enough they were , and next thing I knew I was under arrest .
They went through my belongings and saw that I had a camera with no film .
They claimed I was a South African spy who was coming to take photos of a microwave station 4km away .
They said I 'd thrown away the film when I saw them coming .
I tried to explain that the camera was broken and was my only clock , but they did n't believe me .
They took me to their commanding officer , who had no idea what to do with a 17 year old Canadian in the middle of nowhere in Zambia .
He went through my belongings again , and discovered documentation explaining how quickly armies can move through a country , how far airplanes can do an airstrike , how many tanks it takes to overrun a batallion of soldiers , etc .
I had been planning my war simulation video game for next term 's computer science project and had all the paperwork with me .
This was 1991 so the police officer had never seen , let alone used , a computer , so any explanation went completely over his head .
My explanation about how if the South African government wanted photos of their stupid satellite dishes they 'd just take them FROM a satellite went similarly over their head but did serve to prove to them that I was probably a spy since I knew so much about this sort of thing .
I was then shipped back to Lusaka , the capital city and thrown in jail .
The jail consisted of 3 rooms .
Two were crammed so full of people that there was not even space against the wall for everyone .
The third was used as a toilet .
There was no food or water provided , and no phone call allowed , so if nobody knew you were there and you did n't make friends you were in big trouble .
Fortunately I had several days ' worth of food with me in my backpack so I shared that around and made lots of friends .
Around 10 : 30 the next morning I was summoned again in front of some more important-looking people .
They went through my belongings again , and grilled me for a long time about my " secret documents " and the extra damaging evidence of a filmless camera .
Fortunately , eventually common sense prevailed and they decided that a 17 year old Canadian was unlikely to be travelling alone through the bush to take pictures of some random satellite dishes for the South African government .
They let me call someone up and sent me away .
My life these days is decidedly less exciting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a similar experience when I was in high school.
We lived in Zambia and I went to an American curriculum boarding school in Kenya.
At the end of my school break, I went for what was supposed to be a 4 day backpacking trip by myself.
The first night, I was accosted at my campsite by two drunk guys claiming to be police.
After harassing them for a while (remember that I was young, cocky and naive) I asked to see their paperwork if they were actually police officers.
Sure enough they were, and next thing I knew I was under arrest.
They went through my belongings and saw that I had a camera with no film.
They claimed I was a South African spy who was coming to take photos of a microwave station 4km away.
They said I'd thrown away the film when I saw them coming.
I tried to explain that the camera was broken and was my only clock, but they didn't believe me.
They took me to their commanding officer, who had no idea what to do with a 17 year old Canadian in the middle of nowhere in Zambia.
He went through my belongings again, and discovered documentation explaining how quickly armies can move through a country, how far airplanes can do an airstrike, how many tanks it takes to overrun a batallion of soldiers, etc.
I had been planning my war simulation video game for next term's computer science project and had all the paperwork with me.
This was 1991 so the police officer had never seen, let alone used, a computer, so any explanation went completely over his head.
My explanation about how if the South African government wanted photos of their stupid satellite dishes they'd just take them FROM a satellite went similarly over their head but did serve to prove to them that I was probably a spy since I knew so much about this sort of thing.
I was then shipped back to Lusaka, the capital city and thrown in jail.
The jail consisted of 3 rooms.
Two were crammed so full of people that there was not even space against the wall for everyone.
The third was used as a toilet.
There was no food or water provided, and no phone call allowed, so if nobody knew you were there and you didn't make friends you were in big trouble.
Fortunately I had several days' worth of food with me in my backpack so I shared that around and made lots of friends.
Around 10:30 the next morning I was summoned again in front of some more important-looking people.
They went through my belongings again, and grilled me for a long time about my "secret documents" and the extra damaging evidence of a filmless camera.
Fortunately, eventually common sense prevailed and they decided that a 17 year old Canadian was unlikely to be travelling alone through the bush to take pictures of some random satellite dishes for the South African government.
They let me call someone up and sent me away.
My life these days is decidedly less exciting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516447</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to</title>
	<author>ScentCone</author>
	<datestamp>1246300560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime.
<br> <br>
Thinking about it is a crime.
<br>Writing about it is a crime.
<br>Drawing about it is a crime.</i>
<br> <br>
Is prodding the TSA into making you be one of the thounsands of people that they pull aside each day (I've been one of them) for a closer look, so that your script (on <i>paper</i>? how blog-a-liciously convenient!) will pass temporarily through the hands of agents, so that you can pimp your products to a wider audience via outraged, sympathetic Useful Idiot anecdote-fueled foot-stomping on Slashfot... is <i>that</i> a crime? I guess we'll never know, since he was locked away. Oh, I guess not. He wasn't. Or charged. Or anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime .
Thinking about it is a crime .
Writing about it is a crime .
Drawing about it is a crime .
Is prodding the TSA into making you be one of the thounsands of people that they pull aside each day ( I 've been one of them ) for a closer look , so that your script ( on paper ?
how blog-a-liciously convenient !
) will pass temporarily through the hands of agents , so that you can pimp your products to a wider audience via outraged , sympathetic Useful Idiot anecdote-fueled foot-stomping on Slashfot... is that a crime ?
I guess we 'll never know , since he was locked away .
Oh , I guess not .
He was n't .
Or charged .
Or anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the era of Thought Crime.
Thinking about it is a crime.
Writing about it is a crime.
Drawing about it is a crime.
Is prodding the TSA into making you be one of the thounsands of people that they pull aside each day (I've been one of them) for a closer look, so that your script (on paper?
how blog-a-liciously convenient!
) will pass temporarily through the hands of agents, so that you can pimp your products to a wider audience via outraged, sympathetic Useful Idiot anecdote-fueled foot-stomping on Slashfot... is that a crime?
I guess we'll never know, since he was locked away.
Oh, I guess not.
He wasn't.
Or charged.
Or anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518895</id>
	<title>Re:I Can See It...</title>
	<author>kv9</author>
	<datestamp>1246266780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>diet</i> coke made the airportards laugh at me</p></div><p>next time, get a man's drink.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>diet coke made the airportards laugh at menext time , get a man 's drink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> diet coke made the airportards laugh at menext time, get a man's drink.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28524027</id>
	<title>Every time I fly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246294620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I carry a copy of 1984 in my backpack.  It's always fun seeing how TSA employees react when they pull it out.  I've gotten, "Ahhh, that's a good book" a few times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I carry a copy of 1984 in my backpack .
It 's always fun seeing how TSA employees react when they pull it out .
I 've gotten , " Ahhh , that 's a good book " a few times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I carry a copy of 1984 in my backpack.
It's always fun seeing how TSA employees react when they pull it out.
I've gotten, "Ahhh, that's a good book" a few times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515669</id>
	<title>Why thats...</title>
	<author>j-stroy</author>
	<datestamp>1246297680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unthinkable!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unthinkable !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unthinkable!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516703</id>
	<title>It's a damned good thing ...</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1246301520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... he had not started to write (and therefore would have been carrying around) his new comic story about a trio of bumbling TSA agents that are always screwing up everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... he had not started to write ( and therefore would have been carrying around ) his new comic story about a trio of bumbling TSA agents that are always screwing up everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... he had not started to write (and therefore would have been carrying around) his new comic story about a trio of bumbling TSA agents that are always screwing up everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518549</id>
	<title>Did you ever watch 'The Lone Gunmen'</title>
	<author>RonMcMahon</author>
	<datestamp>1246308900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those of us who watched <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lone-Gunmen-Complete-Bruce-Harwood/dp/B0006UEVUE/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1246305034&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">'The Lone Gunmen'</a> [amazon.com] live or on DVD, you may recall that the pilot episode has the government conspiring to fly a jet airliner in to the World Trade Center.  One of the Lone Gunmen is on said plane while the other two are on a computer network trying to override the 'evil government agent's actions to remotely control the plane to crash in to the building.  Whenever I watch this episode on DVD it is rather chill-instilling, so close to home (They don't crash, they *just* miss hitting the building).<br> <br>

The REAL irony of this is that this episode aired 6 months BEFORE 9/11.  So, should the TSA / NSA / FBI / Secret Service / Homeland Security / NTSB or some 'Men in Black' group go and arrest and detain the writers and producers (perhaps even the evil actors?) of this episode for doing something that *clearly* influenced the terrorists to do the deed for real?<br> <br>

The thought police are here...think happy thoughts...think happy thoughts!</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of us who watched 'The Lone Gunmen ' [ amazon.com ] live or on DVD , you may recall that the pilot episode has the government conspiring to fly a jet airliner in to the World Trade Center .
One of the Lone Gunmen is on said plane while the other two are on a computer network trying to override the 'evil government agent 's actions to remotely control the plane to crash in to the building .
Whenever I watch this episode on DVD it is rather chill-instilling , so close to home ( They do n't crash , they * just * miss hitting the building ) .
The REAL irony of this is that this episode aired 6 months BEFORE 9/11 .
So , should the TSA / NSA / FBI / Secret Service / Homeland Security / NTSB or some 'Men in Black ' group go and arrest and detain the writers and producers ( perhaps even the evil actors ?
) of this episode for doing something that * clearly * influenced the terrorists to do the deed for real ?
The thought police are here...think happy thoughts...think happy thoughts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of us who watched 'The Lone Gunmen' [amazon.com] live or on DVD, you may recall that the pilot episode has the government conspiring to fly a jet airliner in to the World Trade Center.
One of the Lone Gunmen is on said plane while the other two are on a computer network trying to override the 'evil government agent's actions to remotely control the plane to crash in to the building.
Whenever I watch this episode on DVD it is rather chill-instilling, so close to home (They don't crash, they *just* miss hitting the building).
The REAL irony of this is that this episode aired 6 months BEFORE 9/11.
So, should the TSA / NSA / FBI / Secret Service / Homeland Security / NTSB or some 'Men in Black' group go and arrest and detain the writers and producers (perhaps even the evil actors?
) of this episode for doing something that *clearly* influenced the terrorists to do the deed for real?
The thought police are here...think happy thoughts...think happy thoughts!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519329</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>tmosley</author>
	<datestamp>1246268400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't.  I've been on a plane once since 9/11, and I won't be doing it again, at least, not until the TSA is gone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't .
I 've been on a plane once since 9/11 , and I wo n't be doing it again , at least , not until the TSA is gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't.
I've been on a plane once since 9/11, and I won't be doing it again, at least, not until the TSA is gone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516957</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>ThrowAwaySociety</author>
	<datestamp>1246302480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me flesh out that scenario for you.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?"</p></div><p>TSA: Yes. Duh.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking"</p></div><p>Conspiracy to commit murder, conspiracy to destroy buildings and property, conspiracy to commit jaywalking, conspiracy to....</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer"</p></div><p>TSA: Cool with us.</p><p>(long wait)<br>(optional: arrest on above charges, booking, transfer to jail)</p><p>(Lawyer arrives)</p><p>TSA: Okay, having conferred with your lawyer, we're dropping the charges. Have a nice day.</p><p>Lawyer (to dude): Okay, where do I send my bill?<br>----</p><p>Seriously, what would that have accomplished? Not that he accomplished anything anyway. The point is, justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange' books, scripts, magazines, etc. All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.</p></div><p>Yup. We knew that already.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me flesh out that scenario for you.Next time , maybe a better approach would be ( disclaimer , IANAL ) : " Am I being detained ?
" TSA : Yes .
Duh.followed by " I 'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking " Conspiracy to commit murder , conspiracy to destroy buildings and property , conspiracy to commit jaywalking , conspiracy to.... " I wo n't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer " TSA : Cool with us .
( long wait ) ( optional : arrest on above charges , booking , transfer to jail ) ( Lawyer arrives ) TSA : Okay , having conferred with your lawyer , we 're dropping the charges .
Have a nice day.Lawyer ( to dude ) : Okay , where do I send my bill ? ----Seriously , what would that have accomplished ?
Not that he accomplished anything anyway .
The point is , justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient.No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident ; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange ' books , scripts , magazines , etc .
All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.Yup .
We knew that already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me flesh out that scenario for you.Next time, maybe a better approach would be (disclaimer, IANAL): "Am I being detained?
"TSA: Yes.
Duh.followed by "I'd like you to tell me what laws you are accusing me of breaking"Conspiracy to commit murder, conspiracy to destroy buildings and property, conspiracy to commit jaywalking, conspiracy to...."I won't make any statements until I have spoken to a lawyer"TSA: Cool with us.
(long wait)(optional: arrest on above charges, booking, transfer to jail)(Lawyer arrives)TSA: Okay, having conferred with your lawyer, we're dropping the charges.
Have a nice day.Lawyer (to dude): Okay, where do I send my bill?----Seriously, what would that have accomplished?
Not that he accomplished anything anyway.
The point is, justice and due process of law are slow and inconvenient.No policy is likely to be changed as a result of this incident; law-abiding citizens are still going to be stopped in airports for carrying 'strange' books, scripts, magazines, etc.
All this shows is that TSA agents can act in an arbitrary manner with repercussions.Yup.
We knew that already.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516049</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1246298880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's say I'm a screenwriter and I'm working on a terrorist-based film that's filming in the Philippines.  The script has all sorts of stuff about bombs in airplanes and airports, guys with boxcutters seizing planes and flying them into bridges and military bases and so on and so forth.  You're saying if I hop on a plane with the script, I'm asking for trouble?</p><p>I wonder how many real bad guys slip through the cracks will moronic airport employees harass people that they know aren't a threat to anyone.  I suppose it's a lot easier to pick on Joe Q. Public because they've got a comic book or the wrong skin color or last name than to actually secure airports.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's say I 'm a screenwriter and I 'm working on a terrorist-based film that 's filming in the Philippines .
The script has all sorts of stuff about bombs in airplanes and airports , guys with boxcutters seizing planes and flying them into bridges and military bases and so on and so forth .
You 're saying if I hop on a plane with the script , I 'm asking for trouble ? I wonder how many real bad guys slip through the cracks will moronic airport employees harass people that they know are n't a threat to anyone .
I suppose it 's a lot easier to pick on Joe Q. Public because they 've got a comic book or the wrong skin color or last name than to actually secure airports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's say I'm a screenwriter and I'm working on a terrorist-based film that's filming in the Philippines.
The script has all sorts of stuff about bombs in airplanes and airports, guys with boxcutters seizing planes and flying them into bridges and military bases and so on and so forth.
You're saying if I hop on a plane with the script, I'm asking for trouble?I wonder how many real bad guys slip through the cracks will moronic airport employees harass people that they know aren't a threat to anyone.
I suppose it's a lot easier to pick on Joe Q. Public because they've got a comic book or the wrong skin color or last name than to actually secure airports.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516567</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>RageBot</author>
	<datestamp>1246300920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a lot of questions about this, but for starters here is one.

What did the "script" look like?  Was it simply a blue book or loose leaf note book written in crayon (not likely I know; or was it more like the formatted output from a printer?  What did it say on the front (if anything); something like "Unthinkable" on the front and a if the first few pages described what a terrorist should do to commit an unthinkable act I can see how this might make a TSA guy think it was worth a second look.

Next I want to know just how long this guy was "detained"?  If he was able to make his flight it does not seem like such a big deal to me.  I have been "detained" by TSA guys while I had to boot my laptop and they put their grubby paws on my DSLR.  Not to say it was enjoyable and I certainly was not impressed when a female TSA agent looked through the view finder of my DSLR and said this is OK, it is a camera; because the lens cap was still on and she had no way of knowing if the camera was bogus or not.

But the bottom line was I was able to get on my flight on time, even if there were finger prints on my camera and laptop.  If this guy made his flight it looks more like a PR stunt than something we should gripe about.

And I do find it strange no one seems to care if he made his flight or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a lot of questions about this , but for starters here is one .
What did the " script " look like ?
Was it simply a blue book or loose leaf note book written in crayon ( not likely I know ; or was it more like the formatted output from a printer ?
What did it say on the front ( if anything ) ; something like " Unthinkable " on the front and a if the first few pages described what a terrorist should do to commit an unthinkable act I can see how this might make a TSA guy think it was worth a second look .
Next I want to know just how long this guy was " detained " ?
If he was able to make his flight it does not seem like such a big deal to me .
I have been " detained " by TSA guys while I had to boot my laptop and they put their grubby paws on my DSLR .
Not to say it was enjoyable and I certainly was not impressed when a female TSA agent looked through the view finder of my DSLR and said this is OK , it is a camera ; because the lens cap was still on and she had no way of knowing if the camera was bogus or not .
But the bottom line was I was able to get on my flight on time , even if there were finger prints on my camera and laptop .
If this guy made his flight it looks more like a PR stunt than something we should gripe about .
And I do find it strange no one seems to care if he made his flight or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a lot of questions about this, but for starters here is one.
What did the "script" look like?
Was it simply a blue book or loose leaf note book written in crayon (not likely I know; or was it more like the formatted output from a printer?
What did it say on the front (if anything); something like "Unthinkable" on the front and a if the first few pages described what a terrorist should do to commit an unthinkable act I can see how this might make a TSA guy think it was worth a second look.
Next I want to know just how long this guy was "detained"?
If he was able to make his flight it does not seem like such a big deal to me.
I have been "detained" by TSA guys while I had to boot my laptop and they put their grubby paws on my DSLR.
Not to say it was enjoyable and I certainly was not impressed when a female TSA agent looked through the view finder of my DSLR and said this is OK, it is a camera; because the lens cap was still on and she had no way of knowing if the camera was bogus or not.
But the bottom line was I was able to get on my flight on time, even if there were finger prints on my camera and laptop.
If this guy made his flight it looks more like a PR stunt than something we should gripe about.
And I do find it strange no one seems to care if he made his flight or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526191</id>
	<title>everyone is a criminal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246363920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every computer contains rips and unauthorized software. Pencils are stolen from work. The book is overdue from the library. The ID card overstates height and understates weight. The airplane is a trysting place for mile high clubs for the unmarried or other married. It's a wonder that more of these criminal stories aren't reported.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every computer contains rips and unauthorized software .
Pencils are stolen from work .
The book is overdue from the library .
The ID card overstates height and understates weight .
The airplane is a trysting place for mile high clubs for the unmarried or other married .
It 's a wonder that more of these criminal stories are n't reported .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every computer contains rips and unauthorized software.
Pencils are stolen from work.
The book is overdue from the library.
The ID card overstates height and understates weight.
The airplane is a trysting place for mile high clubs for the unmarried or other married.
It's a wonder that more of these criminal stories aren't reported.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520433</id>
	<title>Clever &amp; Smart 35th anniversary issue</title>
	<author>Briareos</author>
	<datestamp>1246272240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or rather <a href="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1170/1357772083\_8eb0fc4c8f\_o.jpg" title="flickr.com">it's last page</a> [flickr.com] - I actually had the German translation of that issue since somewhere in the mid-nineties...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p><i>np: Whitetree - Tangerine (Cloudland)</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or rather it 's last page [ flickr.com ] - I actually had the German translation of that issue since somewhere in the mid-nineties... : Dnp : Whitetree - Tangerine ( Cloudland )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or rather it's last page [flickr.com] - I actually had the German translation of that issue since somewhere in the mid-nineties... :Dnp: Whitetree - Tangerine (Cloudland)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519237</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1246268040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still, he's getting some publicity for his product.  Actually, thinking about it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still , he 's getting some publicity for his product .
Actually , thinking about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still, he's getting some publicity for his product.
Actually, thinking about it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28530953</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>HeckRuler</author>
	<datestamp>1246385100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I would be RIGHT. I would have exercised my RIGHTS. They would have been wrong, and they would remember it. When it happens once, it's an oddity, but when it happens every day, they might actually learn. I would have put in that very little bit of effort and helped keep the USA from sliding from the land of good into the land of bad by simply reminding the uppity thugs of the TSA that I am a human being, a citizen, and that I have rights that shall not be trod upon.
<br> <br>
Bend over and take it if you want, but I'm a proud citizen of a country I love and I'm sure as hell going to put in the effort to keep it that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I would be RIGHT .
I would have exercised my RIGHTS .
They would have been wrong , and they would remember it .
When it happens once , it 's an oddity , but when it happens every day , they might actually learn .
I would have put in that very little bit of effort and helped keep the USA from sliding from the land of good into the land of bad by simply reminding the uppity thugs of the TSA that I am a human being , a citizen , and that I have rights that shall not be trod upon .
Bend over and take it if you want , but I 'm a proud citizen of a country I love and I 'm sure as hell going to put in the effort to keep it that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I would be RIGHT.
I would have exercised my RIGHTS.
They would have been wrong, and they would remember it.
When it happens once, it's an oddity, but when it happens every day, they might actually learn.
I would have put in that very little bit of effort and helped keep the USA from sliding from the land of good into the land of bad by simply reminding the uppity thugs of the TSA that I am a human being, a citizen, and that I have rights that shall not be trod upon.
Bend over and take it if you want, but I'm a proud citizen of a country I love and I'm sure as hell going to put in the effort to keep it that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518797</id>
	<title>Re:Proof please.</title>
	<author>legirons</author>
	<datestamp>1246266420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TSA agent probably thought he'd found Isaac Mendez...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TSA agent probably thought he 'd found Isaac Mendez.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TSA agent probably thought he'd found Isaac Mendez...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847</id>
	<title>The Lone Gunmen episode 1</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From wikipedia:</p><blockquote><div><p>Foreshadowing a number of conspiracy theories which would arise in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the plot of the March 4, 2001 pilot episode of the series depicts a secret faction within the US government plotting to hijack a Boeing 727 and fly it into the World Trade Center by remote control. The stated motive was to increase the military defense budget by blaming the attack on foreign "tin-pot dictators" who are "begging to be smart-bombed."[3][4] In the episode, the plot is eventually foiled by the protagonists who board the doomed plane and deactivate the malicious autopilot system just seconds before the plane would have reached the World Trade Center.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From wikipedia : Foreshadowing a number of conspiracy theories which would arise in the wake of the September 11 , 2001 attacks , the plot of the March 4 , 2001 pilot episode of the series depicts a secret faction within the US government plotting to hijack a Boeing 727 and fly it into the World Trade Center by remote control .
The stated motive was to increase the military defense budget by blaming the attack on foreign " tin-pot dictators " who are " begging to be smart-bombed .
" [ 3 ] [ 4 ] In the episode , the plot is eventually foiled by the protagonists who board the doomed plane and deactivate the malicious autopilot system just seconds before the plane would have reached the World Trade Center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From wikipedia:Foreshadowing a number of conspiracy theories which would arise in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the plot of the March 4, 2001 pilot episode of the series depicts a secret faction within the US government plotting to hijack a Boeing 727 and fly it into the World Trade Center by remote control.
The stated motive was to increase the military defense budget by blaming the attack on foreign "tin-pot dictators" who are "begging to be smart-bombed.
"[3][4] In the episode, the plot is eventually foiled by the protagonists who board the doomed plane and deactivate the malicious autopilot system just seconds before the plane would have reached the World Trade Center.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517523</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IMHO, it's probably not. If you've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have, this is right up their alley. Remember - these guys by and large aren't really trying to do the job they say they're out to do. And they're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are. [...blah blah more of the same rambling for X paragraphs...]</p></div><p>So what you're saying is that if this guy wanted to drum up advertising for his comic by making up a fake TSA detainment, he could do it and use your blind hatred of anybody, anything, and any group bigger and with more authority than you to pretty easily fool you hook, line, and sinker, right?</p><p>Damn.  This artist is one hell of a lot more clever than I thought.  Maybe I should give his comic a shot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO , it 's probably not .
If you 've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have , this is right up their alley .
Remember - these guys by and large are n't really trying to do the job they say they 're out to do .
And they 're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are .
[ ...blah blah more of the same rambling for X paragraphs... ] So what you 're saying is that if this guy wanted to drum up advertising for his comic by making up a fake TSA detainment , he could do it and use your blind hatred of anybody , anything , and any group bigger and with more authority than you to pretty easily fool you hook , line , and sinker , right ? Damn .
This artist is one hell of a lot more clever than I thought .
Maybe I should give his comic a shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO, it's probably not.
If you've heard some of the stupid shit from cops and other government bureaus that I have, this is right up their alley.
Remember - these guys by and large aren't really trying to do the job they say they're out to do.
And they're nowhere near as competent and knowledgeable as they imagine they are.
[...blah blah more of the same rambling for X paragraphs...]So what you're saying is that if this guy wanted to drum up advertising for his comic by making up a fake TSA detainment, he could do it and use your blind hatred of anybody, anything, and any group bigger and with more authority than you to pretty easily fool you hook, line, and sinker, right?Damn.
This artist is one hell of a lot more clever than I thought.
Maybe I should give his comic a shot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516461</id>
	<title>Idiots, absolute idiots!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246300620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if this guy was setting up a publicity stunt, the TSA agents were absolute idiots for even giving a commercial publication a second notice as evidence against the carrier.</p><p>Meanwhile, the real terrorists carried full tactical nukes in the carry on luggage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if this guy was setting up a publicity stunt , the TSA agents were absolute idiots for even giving a commercial publication a second notice as evidence against the carrier.Meanwhile , the real terrorists carried full tactical nukes in the carry on luggage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if this guy was setting up a publicity stunt, the TSA agents were absolute idiots for even giving a commercial publication a second notice as evidence against the carrier.Meanwhile, the real terrorists carried full tactical nukes in the carry on luggage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517191</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>Ma8thew</author>
	<datestamp>1246303320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those rights refer to detention by the police. If you act evasive like that with the TSA then although you would not be arrested, you may not be allowed to board your flight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those rights refer to detention by the police .
If you act evasive like that with the TSA then although you would not be arrested , you may not be allowed to board your flight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those rights refer to detention by the police.
If you act evasive like that with the TSA then although you would not be arrested, you may not be allowed to board your flight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526765</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246369380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Well, I'm back, since you requested my presence. I have been tasered. Three times, in fact. I've lost count of the number of times I've had mace sprayed in my face (well, pepper spray, but it amounts to the same thing).
</p><p>
As for protection against unreasonable search and seizure (another Constitutional right), you're dead wrong. They can search you, then can seize your property, but they cannot make it stick unless you're actually doing something against the law. I don't care if they pat me down, or search my bag. I have to go through almost that much just to get on an airplane. But I do object to cavity searches. I've never had one successfully performed on me in my life. I've never had a cop manage to do more than rip my shirt off, and I was in cuffs at the time. And him and his buddies had to fight to do that. The last cop that tried to take my property away on the way to jail ended up getting knocked on his ass when I picked it up from under his boot (with my hands cuffed behind my back, I might add). And while they smashed my head against the hood of the car until they split my lip wide open, they never did manage to get me to release my property nor could they even force my arms from my sides.
</p><p>
I let my lawyer fight in the courtroom. Outside of that, I know my rights and I fight for them. Even if it means that I get injured or the living shit beat out of me. I still win in the end, since I preserve my honor.
</p><p>
So, at your request, my hand is raised. And I'm keeping it up. Live for something, or die for nothing. You're going to die one of these days anyways, so you might as well do it on your feet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'm back , since you requested my presence .
I have been tasered .
Three times , in fact .
I 've lost count of the number of times I 've had mace sprayed in my face ( well , pepper spray , but it amounts to the same thing ) .
As for protection against unreasonable search and seizure ( another Constitutional right ) , you 're dead wrong .
They can search you , then can seize your property , but they can not make it stick unless you 're actually doing something against the law .
I do n't care if they pat me down , or search my bag .
I have to go through almost that much just to get on an airplane .
But I do object to cavity searches .
I 've never had one successfully performed on me in my life .
I 've never had a cop manage to do more than rip my shirt off , and I was in cuffs at the time .
And him and his buddies had to fight to do that .
The last cop that tried to take my property away on the way to jail ended up getting knocked on his ass when I picked it up from under his boot ( with my hands cuffed behind my back , I might add ) .
And while they smashed my head against the hood of the car until they split my lip wide open , they never did manage to get me to release my property nor could they even force my arms from my sides .
I let my lawyer fight in the courtroom .
Outside of that , I know my rights and I fight for them .
Even if it means that I get injured or the living shit beat out of me .
I still win in the end , since I preserve my honor .
So , at your request , my hand is raised .
And I 'm keeping it up .
Live for something , or die for nothing .
You 're going to die one of these days anyways , so you might as well do it on your feet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Well, I'm back, since you requested my presence.
I have been tasered.
Three times, in fact.
I've lost count of the number of times I've had mace sprayed in my face (well, pepper spray, but it amounts to the same thing).
As for protection against unreasonable search and seizure (another Constitutional right), you're dead wrong.
They can search you, then can seize your property, but they cannot make it stick unless you're actually doing something against the law.
I don't care if they pat me down, or search my bag.
I have to go through almost that much just to get on an airplane.
But I do object to cavity searches.
I've never had one successfully performed on me in my life.
I've never had a cop manage to do more than rip my shirt off, and I was in cuffs at the time.
And him and his buddies had to fight to do that.
The last cop that tried to take my property away on the way to jail ended up getting knocked on his ass when I picked it up from under his boot (with my hands cuffed behind my back, I might add).
And while they smashed my head against the hood of the car until they split my lip wide open, they never did manage to get me to release my property nor could they even force my arms from my sides.
I let my lawyer fight in the courtroom.
Outside of that, I know my rights and I fight for them.
Even if it means that I get injured or the living shit beat out of me.
I still win in the end, since I preserve my honor.
So, at your request, my hand is raised.
And I'm keeping it up.
Live for something, or die for nothing.
You're going to die one of these days anyways, so you might as well do it on your feet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516757</id>
	<title>So what's the story here?</title>
	<author>Mike Buddha</author>
	<datestamp>1246301700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He got tagged for a more thorough search. It must've been the TSA's new un-American script radars. He got searched. They found a script. They read it. They let him go. Did I miss anything?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He got tagged for a more thorough search .
It must 've been the TSA 's new un-American script radars .
He got searched .
They found a script .
They read it .
They let him go .
Did I miss anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He got tagged for a more thorough search.
It must've been the TSA's new un-American script radars.
He got searched.
They found a script.
They read it.
They let him go.
Did I miss anything?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515763</id>
	<title>Slashvertisement</title>
	<author>Kuj0317</author>
	<datestamp>1246297980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just insulting how thinly veiled it is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just insulting how thinly veiled it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just insulting how thinly veiled it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517441</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>pjabardo</author>
	<datestamp>1246304280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are obviously correct because terrorists are so dumb that they are can not memorize their plans. I mean, the only way they can possibly remember out is to tatoo the plans on the chest and try to board the plane without a shirt.
<br> <br>
The real smart ones, on the other hand, try to board the plane with a folder with the following large size capital letters: <b>TERROR PLANS - NOT TO BE SHOWN TO TSA AGENTS</b>.
<br> <br>
If these guys went after people like these there would never be terrorist attacks anywhere. Avoiding terrorism is so easy...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are obviously correct because terrorists are so dumb that they are can not memorize their plans .
I mean , the only way they can possibly remember out is to tatoo the plans on the chest and try to board the plane without a shirt .
The real smart ones , on the other hand , try to board the plane with a folder with the following large size capital letters : TERROR PLANS - NOT TO BE SHOWN TO TSA AGENTS .
If these guys went after people like these there would never be terrorist attacks anywhere .
Avoiding terrorism is so easy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are obviously correct because terrorists are so dumb that they are can not memorize their plans.
I mean, the only way they can possibly remember out is to tatoo the plans on the chest and try to board the plane without a shirt.
The real smart ones, on the other hand, try to board the plane with a folder with the following large size capital letters: TERROR PLANS - NOT TO BE SHOWN TO TSA AGENTS.
If these guys went after people like these there would never be terrorist attacks anywhere.
Avoiding terrorism is so easy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516571</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>jandrese</author>
	<datestamp>1246300980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Usually it's groups with names like "Concerned Parents for a Moral Tomorrow" or something like that.  They won't let their kids read those kind of books (the ones that might accidentally cause their kids to start thinking on their own), and want to make sure their kids can't accidentally run across them at the library.  These kinds of groups are organized enough to stack PTA meetings and get their members elected to the school board if that's what it takes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually it 's groups with names like " Concerned Parents for a Moral Tomorrow " or something like that .
They wo n't let their kids read those kind of books ( the ones that might accidentally cause their kids to start thinking on their own ) , and want to make sure their kids ca n't accidentally run across them at the library .
These kinds of groups are organized enough to stack PTA meetings and get their members elected to the school board if that 's what it takes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually it's groups with names like "Concerned Parents for a Moral Tomorrow" or something like that.
They won't let their kids read those kind of books (the ones that might accidentally cause their kids to start thinking on their own), and want to make sure their kids can't accidentally run across them at the library.
These kinds of groups are organized enough to stack PTA meetings and get their members elected to the school board if that's what it takes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515809</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>S810</author>
	<datestamp>1246298100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Comic Writers are not paid as well Screen Writers, they have to take commercial travel and they have to have a way to transport their work. Should he have put it in a checked bag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Comic Writers are not paid as well Screen Writers , they have to take commercial travel and they have to have a way to transport their work .
Should he have put it in a checked bag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Comic Writers are not paid as well Screen Writers, they have to take commercial travel and they have to have a way to transport their work.
Should he have put it in a checked bag?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515773</id>
	<title>He forgot the most important part</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1246298040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whether they let him go.
<p>
One presumes they did - otherwise it would have been mentioned. In which case it's just a sorry tale of someone, one of many every day, who gets stopped. Nothing much to see here. Let's have another story please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether they let him go .
One presumes they did - otherwise it would have been mentioned .
In which case it 's just a sorry tale of someone , one of many every day , who gets stopped .
Nothing much to see here .
Let 's have another story please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether they let him go.
One presumes they did - otherwise it would have been mentioned.
In which case it's just a sorry tale of someone, one of many every day, who gets stopped.
Nothing much to see here.
Let's have another story please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518987</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1246267140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the "hero who died in the line of duty"; generally through their own stupidity, like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth, what do you think the real numbers are?).</p></div><p>For not hearing about very many cops that got shot, you sure have your "generally" statements figured out.</p><p>Also, cops getting shot at don't usually make good news.  Civilians getting shot by cops?  Sensational.  Great news.  I hope neither of us actually believe that most news outlets are actually interested in giving news.  Some reporters are, sure.  But most news organizations are primarily interested in money... like most people and organizations.</p><p>So until normal people decide they (1) won't believe everything they see/read, (2) realize that "greed" is not just a word associated with "Microsoft" or "Wall Street," (3) realize that news organizations are interested in money, and (4) demand real news, refuse to get caught up in sensationalist hype, and research things out for themselves... we will likely continue to have the same news, continue to have the same stupid legislation passed by people that WE ELECTED (apparently because we're stupid enough to believe what someone says, even if their past record defies what they are saying now, as if suddenly faced with a higher-paying-position and corporate sponsors they decide to shape up?)...</p><p>All in all, your post seems to be "the cops are after you, organized government is a bad thing, anarchy is the way it needs to be... and if you disagree with me you are a stupid sheep getting herded by the oligarchist rulers."  Which is pretty sensational and people like to believe it because then they aren't viewed as sheep anymore.</p><p>Luckily for me, people still fear the police.  Otherwise, I'm pretty sure I would have died on the California freeways by now.  Or gotten robbed of more than just my bike.</p><p>Note: I'm not saying I agree 100\% with government as a matter of principle or something stupid like that, but I would blame our current legislation status on those that voted.  People are swayed by the stupidest things.  Like the way someone looks.  The color of his skin.  The way someone talks.  Age.  Their position on a single groups' rights.  And people believe the silliest things, like huge government programs that won't cost anybody anything.  And no, this is not just "anti democrat" or "anti liberal" stuff.  Conservatives and republicans do the same stuff, though not usually the same categories.</p><p>And frankly, I think a lot of the problems I see (and have commented on) come from education.  People don't like history, people don't like listening, people don't like authority.  And it seems children are taught to not like history (or at least not care about it), not like to listen, not like authority, not to take responsibility, not to stand up for what you think is right, not to bother getting out of bed if you don't want to... etc.  No wonder they vote the way they do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the " hero who died in the line of duty " ; generally through their own stupidity , like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth , what do you think the real numbers are ?
) .For not hearing about very many cops that got shot , you sure have your " generally " statements figured out.Also , cops getting shot at do n't usually make good news .
Civilians getting shot by cops ?
Sensational. Great news .
I hope neither of us actually believe that most news outlets are actually interested in giving news .
Some reporters are , sure .
But most news organizations are primarily interested in money... like most people and organizations.So until normal people decide they ( 1 ) wo n't believe everything they see/read , ( 2 ) realize that " greed " is not just a word associated with " Microsoft " or " Wall Street , " ( 3 ) realize that news organizations are interested in money , and ( 4 ) demand real news , refuse to get caught up in sensationalist hype , and research things out for themselves... we will likely continue to have the same news , continue to have the same stupid legislation passed by people that WE ELECTED ( apparently because we 're stupid enough to believe what someone says , even if their past record defies what they are saying now , as if suddenly faced with a higher-paying-position and corporate sponsors they decide to shape up ?
) ...All in all , your post seems to be " the cops are after you , organized government is a bad thing , anarchy is the way it needs to be... and if you disagree with me you are a stupid sheep getting herded by the oligarchist rulers .
" Which is pretty sensational and people like to believe it because then they are n't viewed as sheep anymore.Luckily for me , people still fear the police .
Otherwise , I 'm pretty sure I would have died on the California freeways by now .
Or gotten robbed of more than just my bike.Note : I 'm not saying I agree 100 \ % with government as a matter of principle or something stupid like that , but I would blame our current legislation status on those that voted .
People are swayed by the stupidest things .
Like the way someone looks .
The color of his skin .
The way someone talks .
Age. Their position on a single groups ' rights .
And people believe the silliest things , like huge government programs that wo n't cost anybody anything .
And no , this is not just " anti democrat " or " anti liberal " stuff .
Conservatives and republicans do the same stuff , though not usually the same categories.And frankly , I think a lot of the problems I see ( and have commented on ) come from education .
People do n't like history , people do n't like listening , people do n't like authority .
And it seems children are taught to not like history ( or at least not care about it ) , not like to listen , not like authority , not to take responsibility , not to stand up for what you think is right , not to bother getting out of bed if you do n't want to... etc. No wonder they vote the way they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(think about it - you hear ten times as many stories about cops shooting unarmed civilians as you do an armed civilian shooting a cop...yet the cop is always painted as the "hero who died in the line of duty"; generally through their own stupidity, like not searching someone they just antagonized and arrested...now if the supposedly unbiased news puts those figures forth, what do you think the real numbers are?
).For not hearing about very many cops that got shot, you sure have your "generally" statements figured out.Also, cops getting shot at don't usually make good news.
Civilians getting shot by cops?
Sensational.  Great news.
I hope neither of us actually believe that most news outlets are actually interested in giving news.
Some reporters are, sure.
But most news organizations are primarily interested in money... like most people and organizations.So until normal people decide they (1) won't believe everything they see/read, (2) realize that "greed" is not just a word associated with "Microsoft" or "Wall Street," (3) realize that news organizations are interested in money, and (4) demand real news, refuse to get caught up in sensationalist hype, and research things out for themselves... we will likely continue to have the same news, continue to have the same stupid legislation passed by people that WE ELECTED (apparently because we're stupid enough to believe what someone says, even if their past record defies what they are saying now, as if suddenly faced with a higher-paying-position and corporate sponsors they decide to shape up?
)...All in all, your post seems to be "the cops are after you, organized government is a bad thing, anarchy is the way it needs to be... and if you disagree with me you are a stupid sheep getting herded by the oligarchist rulers.
"  Which is pretty sensational and people like to believe it because then they aren't viewed as sheep anymore.Luckily for me, people still fear the police.
Otherwise, I'm pretty sure I would have died on the California freeways by now.
Or gotten robbed of more than just my bike.Note: I'm not saying I agree 100\% with government as a matter of principle or something stupid like that, but I would blame our current legislation status on those that voted.
People are swayed by the stupidest things.
Like the way someone looks.
The color of his skin.
The way someone talks.
Age.  Their position on a single groups' rights.
And people believe the silliest things, like huge government programs that won't cost anybody anything.
And no, this is not just "anti democrat" or "anti liberal" stuff.
Conservatives and republicans do the same stuff, though not usually the same categories.And frankly, I think a lot of the problems I see (and have commented on) come from education.
People don't like history, people don't like listening, people don't like authority.
And it seems children are taught to not like history (or at least not care about it), not like to listen, not like authority, not to take responsibility, not to stand up for what you think is right, not to bother getting out of bed if you don't want to... etc.  No wonder they vote the way they do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518563</id>
	<title>Re:Bad move</title>
	<author>Spaham</author>
	<datestamp>1246308960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or "I'm sorry sir, but my wife does the irony for my shirts"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or " I 'm sorry sir , but my wife does the irony for my shirts "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or "I'm sorry sir, but my wife does the irony for my shirts"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520577</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246272900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And a cavity search? Oh, I'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me. You ain't getting my clothes off unless you've already arrested me and have me full restraints (which makes it pretty hard to get someone's clothes off without cutting them off). Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do.</p></div><p> You could always resist the temptation to open your anus for the approaching male operated probes and ask for a woman officer to perform the said search gently for a much more sexually satisfying experience. This is not the unrelenting Borat with the double dildo attack we are talking about, after all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And a cavity search ?
Oh , I 'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me .
You ai n't getting my clothes off unless you 've already arrested me and have me full restraints ( which makes it pretty hard to get someone 's clothes off without cutting them off ) .
Because I can and will fight , and there 's only so many people that can gang up on one man , and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious , which is pretty hard to do .
You could always resist the temptation to open your anus for the approaching male operated probes and ask for a woman officer to perform the said search gently for a much more sexually satisfying experience .
This is not the unrelenting Borat with the double dildo attack we are talking about , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And a cavity search?
Oh, I'd love to see those fuckers try that one of me.
You ain't getting my clothes off unless you've already arrested me and have me full restraints (which makes it pretty hard to get someone's clothes off without cutting them off).
Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do.
You could always resist the temptation to open your anus for the approaching male operated probes and ask for a woman officer to perform the said search gently for a much more sexually satisfying experience.
This is not the unrelenting Borat with the double dildo attack we are talking about, after all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517077</id>
	<title>How To Beat a Think Tank</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246302900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need a think tank to come up with fantastic ideas, plans and scenarios. All you need is your brain and Creator Studio creative thinking software http://www.compxpressinc.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need a think tank to come up with fantastic ideas , plans and scenarios .
All you need is your brain and Creator Studio creative thinking software http : //www.compxpressinc.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need a think tank to come up with fantastic ideas, plans and scenarios.
All you need is your brain and Creator Studio creative thinking software http://www.compxpressinc.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515923</id>
	<title>That the guy's an idiot?</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1246298520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, let's go and have a bunch of papers about blowing up airplanes and have them past people paid to guard them.  The dude was retarded.  I don't blame the guards for detaining him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , let 's go and have a bunch of papers about blowing up airplanes and have them past people paid to guard them .
The dude was retarded .
I do n't blame the guards for detaining him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, let's go and have a bunch of papers about blowing up airplanes and have them past people paid to guard them.
The dude was retarded.
I don't blame the guards for detaining him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519583</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246269180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, you should try it out for real and then come back and tell us about how it went!!! (Note, I think you'll get tasered as well, but don't let that put you off.. apparently its not a lethal weapon!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , you should try it out for real and then come back and tell us about how it went ! ! !
( Note , I think you 'll get tasered as well , but do n't let that put you off.. apparently its not a lethal weapon !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, you should try it out for real and then come back and tell us about how it went!!!
(Note, I think you'll get tasered as well, but don't let that put you off.. apparently its not a lethal weapon!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518825</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246266540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"..Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do..."</p><p>Ooohh! You sound awfully big and scary on slashdot!  May I suggest that they only need one quite puny guy, and a Taser...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ..Because I can and will fight , and there 's only so many people that can gang up on one man , and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious , which is pretty hard to do... " Ooohh !
You sound awfully big and scary on slashdot !
May I suggest that they only need one quite puny guy , and a Taser... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"..Because I can and will fight, and there's only so many people that can gang up on one man, and that is not enough to get my clothes off me without beating me unconscious, which is pretty hard to do..."Ooohh!
You sound awfully big and scary on slashdot!
May I suggest that they only need one quite puny guy, and a Taser...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520237</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe, Maybe not...</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1246271400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are being ridiculous.  I think you think that way because you are the type of person who tries to do as little as possible and get away with it.  Seriously, I wouldn't want to be a cop.  The ones I know do a crap load...putting their lives at risk all the time...all so some moron like you can spout off how awful they are.  Are there bad cops?  Yes.  Are there people bad at their jobs in every single profession.  Yes.  But you are just so far over the top.<br> <br>You are so pissed off about a cavity search that has never happened to you.  You seem to be the type of jerk who would like to be stopped just so you can make a big scene when if you cooperated it wouldn't be a big deal.  You, as a person, have become a dick.  And I hope no one protects you until you learn that being a narcissistic prick isn't the best way to live your life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are being ridiculous .
I think you think that way because you are the type of person who tries to do as little as possible and get away with it .
Seriously , I would n't want to be a cop .
The ones I know do a crap load...putting their lives at risk all the time...all so some moron like you can spout off how awful they are .
Are there bad cops ?
Yes. Are there people bad at their jobs in every single profession .
Yes. But you are just so far over the top .
You are so pissed off about a cavity search that has never happened to you .
You seem to be the type of jerk who would like to be stopped just so you can make a big scene when if you cooperated it would n't be a big deal .
You , as a person , have become a dick .
And I hope no one protects you until you learn that being a narcissistic prick is n't the best way to live your life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are being ridiculous.
I think you think that way because you are the type of person who tries to do as little as possible and get away with it.
Seriously, I wouldn't want to be a cop.
The ones I know do a crap load...putting their lives at risk all the time...all so some moron like you can spout off how awful they are.
Are there bad cops?
Yes.  Are there people bad at their jobs in every single profession.
Yes.  But you are just so far over the top.
You are so pissed off about a cavity search that has never happened to you.
You seem to be the type of jerk who would like to be stopped just so you can make a big scene when if you cooperated it wouldn't be a big deal.
You, as a person, have become a dick.
And I hope no one protects you until you learn that being a narcissistic prick isn't the best way to live your life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515933</id>
	<title>They're just bored</title>
	<author>snsh</author>
	<datestamp>1246298520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The TSA folks were probably just bored, and jumped at the chance to play terrorist make-believe.  Now they feel foolish, but while it was happening it was probably quite a thrill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The TSA folks were probably just bored , and jumped at the chance to play terrorist make-believe .
Now they feel foolish , but while it was happening it was probably quite a thrill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TSA folks were probably just bored, and jumped at the chance to play terrorist make-believe.
Now they feel foolish, but while it was happening it was probably quite a thrill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522537</id>
	<title>Re:Proof please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246283100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't that require that a TSA agent had at least a grade level reading capacity and that they would have enough curiosity to actually crack a comic cover? In my experience, these folks rate right up there with social services employees. "NEXT!".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that require that a TSA agent had at least a grade level reading capacity and that they would have enough curiosity to actually crack a comic cover ?
In my experience , these folks rate right up there with social services employees .
" NEXT ! " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that require that a TSA agent had at least a grade level reading capacity and that they would have enough curiosity to actually crack a comic cover?
In my experience, these folks rate right up there with social services employees.
"NEXT!".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518001</id>
	<title>america is changing into what?</title>
	<author>haruvatu</author>
	<datestamp>1246306560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
<a href="http://avaxhome.ws/magazines/comics/unthinkable\_1\_of\_5\_ongoing.html" title="avaxhome.ws" rel="nofollow">http://avaxhome.ws/magazines/comics/unthinkable\_1\_of\_5\_ongoing.html</a> [avaxhome.ws]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //avaxhome.ws/magazines/comics/unthinkable \ _1 \ _of \ _5 \ _ongoing.html [ avaxhome.ws ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
http://avaxhome.ws/magazines/comics/unthinkable\_1\_of\_5\_ongoing.html [avaxhome.ws]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521065</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246275420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The moral of the story? If you write or draw about terrorism on an airplane, use a train or a bus. If you write or draw about terrorism on a train, use an airplane or a bus. If you write or draw about terrorism on a bus, use any means of transportation you like. This formula works even after a 9/11 on a train or a bus, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The moral of the story ?
If you write or draw about terrorism on an airplane , use a train or a bus .
If you write or draw about terrorism on a train , use an airplane or a bus .
If you write or draw about terrorism on a bus , use any means of transportation you like .
This formula works even after a 9/11 on a train or a bus , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moral of the story?
If you write or draw about terrorism on an airplane, use a train or a bus.
If you write or draw about terrorism on a train, use an airplane or a bus.
If you write or draw about terrorism on a bus, use any means of transportation you like.
This formula works even after a 9/11 on a train or a bus, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711</id>
	<title>I Can See It...</title>
	<author>S810</author>
	<datestamp>1246297860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see the grossly under-paid TSA Employees thinking: "Yay! We got one! We got a terrorist!" Too bad they don't go to school to learn the difference between Art and Terror Plans!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see the grossly under-paid TSA Employees thinking : " Yay !
We got one !
We got a terrorist !
" Too bad they do n't go to school to learn the difference between Art and Terror Plans !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see the grossly under-paid TSA Employees thinking: "Yay!
We got one!
We got a terrorist!
" Too bad they don't go to school to learn the difference between Art and Terror Plans!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523143</id>
	<title>And again, rule 9/11: Never fly to the USA. Ever.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246287300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as with Iran, North Korea, and that African state with that cruel leader (forgot his name).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as with Iran , North Korea , and that African state with that cruel leader ( forgot his name ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as with Iran, North Korea, and that African state with that cruel leader (forgot his name).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518021</id>
	<title>Re:ignorance of your own rights</title>
	<author>goldspider</author>
	<datestamp>1246306620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing Mr. Sable is more interested in selling copies of his comic book (sorry, graphic novel) than championing a First Amendment case.  Hence the Slashvertisement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing Mr. Sable is more interested in selling copies of his comic book ( sorry , graphic novel ) than championing a First Amendment case .
Hence the Slashvertisement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing Mr. Sable is more interested in selling copies of his comic book (sorry, graphic novel) than championing a First Amendment case.
Hence the Slashvertisement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518317</id>
	<title>Re:it is sad..</title>
	<author>Artifakt</author>
	<datestamp>1246307880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was once one of those people who had exceptionally broad rights to conduct searches. As a military officer, I could, in theory, have searched a whole barracks full of the personal effects of a whole company of enlisted soldiers for a single stolen item. But before they would have turned me loose to do that, even as a raw Lieutenant, the government made it very clear that there was paperwork that had to be kept on record, documenting the steps of the search AND what other steps were taken to solve the crime before command decided a search was necessary. They made it clear that I had to deliver a Miranda warning (and the military form of the Miranda actually explains more rights than the Civil form.). They made it clear that the decision to authorize a search was limited to command personnel and not staff officers/staff NCOs, and why.<br>
&nbsp; If I was supposed to be searching for a stolen boom-box, I had to have a good description, and not search inside anything too small to hold that boom-box. Even if I thought I smelled dope (and I've been to a controlled burn and can claim legally to know what Pot smells like), I couldn't act on it (beyond mentioning the scent to the owner of that gear, as in "Smells like pot - I hope you wouldn't mess with that stuff. - You know it's illegal and they can throw you out of the Army if you do - oh well, I'm just here to look for a boom-box.).<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If I could be held to that standard 20 years ago, when dealing with people who had agreed to give up some of their rights as a condition of enlistment, and to be bound by a special set of laws (The Uniform Code of Military Justice), I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was once one of those people who had exceptionally broad rights to conduct searches .
As a military officer , I could , in theory , have searched a whole barracks full of the personal effects of a whole company of enlisted soldiers for a single stolen item .
But before they would have turned me loose to do that , even as a raw Lieutenant , the government made it very clear that there was paperwork that had to be kept on record , documenting the steps of the search AND what other steps were taken to solve the crime before command decided a search was necessary .
They made it clear that I had to deliver a Miranda warning ( and the military form of the Miranda actually explains more rights than the Civil form. ) .
They made it clear that the decision to authorize a search was limited to command personnel and not staff officers/staff NCOs , and why .
  If I was supposed to be searching for a stolen boom-box , I had to have a good description , and not search inside anything too small to hold that boom-box .
Even if I thought I smelled dope ( and I 've been to a controlled burn and can claim legally to know what Pot smells like ) , I could n't act on it ( beyond mentioning the scent to the owner of that gear , as in " Smells like pot - I hope you would n't mess with that stuff .
- You know it 's illegal and they can throw you out of the Army if you do - oh well , I 'm just here to look for a boom-box. ) .
      If I could be held to that standard 20 years ago , when dealing with people who had agreed to give up some of their rights as a condition of enlistment , and to be bound by a special set of laws ( The Uniform Code of Military Justice ) , I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was once one of those people who had exceptionally broad rights to conduct searches.
As a military officer, I could, in theory, have searched a whole barracks full of the personal effects of a whole company of enlisted soldiers for a single stolen item.
But before they would have turned me loose to do that, even as a raw Lieutenant, the government made it very clear that there was paperwork that had to be kept on record, documenting the steps of the search AND what other steps were taken to solve the crime before command decided a search was necessary.
They made it clear that I had to deliver a Miranda warning (and the military form of the Miranda actually explains more rights than the Civil form.).
They made it clear that the decision to authorize a search was limited to command personnel and not staff officers/staff NCOs, and why.
  If I was supposed to be searching for a stolen boom-box, I had to have a good description, and not search inside anything too small to hold that boom-box.
Even if I thought I smelled dope (and I've been to a controlled burn and can claim legally to know what Pot smells like), I couldn't act on it (beyond mentioning the scent to the owner of that gear, as in "Smells like pot - I hope you wouldn't mess with that stuff.
- You know it's illegal and they can throw you out of the Army if you do - oh well, I'm just here to look for a boom-box.).
      If I could be held to that standard 20 years ago, when dealing with people who had agreed to give up some of their rights as a condition of enlistment, and to be bound by a special set of laws (The Uniform Code of Military Justice), I have to wonder why on Earth the US citizenry allows the present situation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521981</id>
	<title>Man.</title>
	<author>rantingkitten</author>
	<datestamp>1246280160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>tried to explain to them the irony of the situation. </i> <br>
<br>
Was this guy <b>trying</b> to make it harder on himself?  People like that will rarely have the brains to understand the irony, and if they do, they're going to be even more ticked off for you having made them look silly or stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>tried to explain to them the irony of the situation .
Was this guy trying to make it harder on himself ?
People like that will rarely have the brains to understand the irony , and if they do , they 're going to be even more ticked off for you having made them look silly or stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tried to explain to them the irony of the situation.
Was this guy trying to make it harder on himself?
People like that will rarely have the brains to understand the irony, and if they do, they're going to be even more ticked off for you having made them look silly or stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516951</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1246302420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have all sorts of thoughts about cloning myself and fantasize about it all of the time, since Cloning is illegal now in the USA, I guess I am commiting a thought crime every time I dream about asexual reproduction.</p><p>They better get the IP list of all Slashdot users, I am sure 99.9999\% of them are guilty of some sorta thought crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have all sorts of thoughts about cloning myself and fantasize about it all of the time , since Cloning is illegal now in the USA , I guess I am commiting a thought crime every time I dream about asexual reproduction.They better get the IP list of all Slashdot users , I am sure 99.9999 \ % of them are guilty of some sorta thought crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have all sorts of thoughts about cloning myself and fantasize about it all of the time, since Cloning is illegal now in the USA, I guess I am commiting a thought crime every time I dream about asexual reproduction.They better get the IP list of all Slashdot users, I am sure 99.9999\% of them are guilty of some sorta thought crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28529711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516651
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28525489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28530953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518021
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28524255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517107
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28539087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516865
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28535217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_1629225_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516653
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518327
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28530953
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517863
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520287
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516957
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28535217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28525489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516787
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515861
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28524255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28523143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515793
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516167
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515927
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516571
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516363
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516673
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517921
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28526765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28520237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28521191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518317
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28529711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28517765
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515707
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28519171
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28539087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518797
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28522537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28515923
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28518823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_1629225.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_1629225.28516757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
