<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_29_0118227</id>
	<title>Lenovo Tinkers With Larger Delete and Escape Keys</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246288320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Slatterz writes <i>"After a year's research, Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install <a href="http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/148728,lenovo-increases-size-of-panic-buttons.aspx">larger Delete and Escape keys</a> on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range. While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century. What convinced them to make the size-change was doing some tests on users to see which keys they use the most. They found that on average, people used the Escape and Delete keys 700 times per week, yet those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo hasn't made any bigger."</i> The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slatterz writes " After a year 's research , Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install larger Delete and Escape keys on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range .
While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century .
What convinced them to make the size-change was doing some tests on users to see which keys they use the most .
They found that on average , people used the Escape and Delete keys 700 times per week , yet those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo has n't made any bigger .
" The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda ; death is too good for Caps Lock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slatterz writes "After a year's research, Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install larger Delete and Escape keys on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range.
While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.
What convinced them to make the size-change was doing some tests on users to see which keys they use the most.
They found that on average, people used the Escape and Delete keys 700 times per week, yet those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo hasn't made any bigger.
" The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511105</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1246308960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Command Key was used for those sorts of things long before Windows 95 introduced the windows key.<br>Also, it is in the same position as the Alt key on a PC keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Command Key was used for those sorts of things long before Windows 95 introduced the windows key.Also , it is in the same position as the Alt key on a PC keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Command Key was used for those sorts of things long before Windows 95 introduced the windows key.Also, it is in the same position as the Alt key on a PC keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510207</id>
	<title>don't touch CAPS LOCK</title>
	<author>speedtux</author>
	<datestamp>1246213800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apparently the next keyboard evolution could be the death of the caps lock</i></p><p>I hope not.  The key is incredibly useful... for remapping to some other function.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently the next keyboard evolution could be the death of the caps lockI hope not .
The key is incredibly useful... for remapping to some other function .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently the next keyboard evolution could be the death of the caps lockI hope not.
The key is incredibly useful... for remapping to some other function.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509891</id>
	<title>19th century?</title>
	<author>javert</author>
	<datestamp>1246211040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p></div></blockquote><p>There were keyboards in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th\_century" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">19th century</a> [wikipedia.org]??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.There were keyboards in the 19th century [ wikipedia.org ] ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.There were keyboards in the 19th century [wikipedia.org]?
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519175</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246267860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact in Latin-1, CAPS LOCK is the only way to have uppercase accent letters.<br>Example on a french keyboard : &#195;&#169; &#195;(CapsLock+&#195;&#169;) &#195; &#195;(Capslock +&#195;) etc...<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard\_layout#French</p><p>Note that you have to do shift-upper row key to have the numbers ! Always strange when you switch from qwerty to azerty</p><p>The best solution would have been like old sun keyboards to combine accents and letters to be able to do all the latin language with one layout.</p><p>But i agree with you that if you use only ascii-7, CapsLock is way overkill</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact in Latin-1 , CAPS LOCK is the only way to have uppercase accent letters.Example on a french keyboard :       ( CapsLock +     )     ( Capslock +   ) etc...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard \ _layout # FrenchNote that you have to do shift-upper row key to have the numbers !
Always strange when you switch from qwerty to azertyThe best solution would have been like old sun keyboards to combine accents and letters to be able to do all the latin language with one layout.But i agree with you that if you use only ascii-7 , CapsLock is way overkill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact in Latin-1, CAPS LOCK is the only way to have uppercase accent letters.Example on a french keyboard : Ã© Ã(CapsLock+Ã©) Ã Ã(Capslock +Ã) etc...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard\_layout#FrenchNote that you have to do shift-upper row key to have the numbers !
Always strange when you switch from qwerty to azertyThe best solution would have been like old sun keyboards to combine accents and letters to be able to do all the latin language with one layout.But i agree with you that if you use only ascii-7, CapsLock is way overkill</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510195</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1246213680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The keys pads seem very cheap on the Macbooks.  This only bugs me more because I've always thought of Apple as an attention-to-detail company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The keys pads seem very cheap on the Macbooks .
This only bugs me more because I 've always thought of Apple as an attention-to-detail company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The keys pads seem very cheap on the Macbooks.
This only bugs me more because I've always thought of Apple as an attention-to-detail company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509915</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246211160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That damn numlock key has been about the worst.  I hated it back in 1981, along with the misplaced and misshapen  key, the backslash between the Z and the left shift key, and the strangely shrunken backspace key--but at least IBM corrected those other mistakes as they went along.  Not the numlock though.  That's a key that should have never existed.  Almost every other computer back then had separate numeric and cursor keys--why not IBM?  I had to write a TSR to remap the keyboard before I could consider it usable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That damn numlock key has been about the worst .
I hated it back in 1981 , along with the misplaced and misshapen key , the backslash between the Z and the left shift key , and the strangely shrunken backspace key--but at least IBM corrected those other mistakes as they went along .
Not the numlock though .
That 's a key that should have never existed .
Almost every other computer back then had separate numeric and cursor keys--why not IBM ?
I had to write a TSR to remap the keyboard before I could consider it usable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That damn numlock key has been about the worst.
I hated it back in 1981, along with the misplaced and misshapen  key, the backslash between the Z and the left shift key, and the strangely shrunken backspace key--but at least IBM corrected those other mistakes as they went along.
Not the numlock though.
That's a key that should have never existed.
Almost every other computer back then had separate numeric and cursor keys--why not IBM?
I had to write a TSR to remap the keyboard before I could consider it usable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512049</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246276500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What really annoys me about Thinkpad keyboards is the awkward placement of the fn key. It is placed where the left Ctrl key is normally placed and I can't get used to it because my other laptop uses the traditional placement. To add salt to the wound, KeyTweak and similar programs are no use because it seems that the fn key is mapped at some lower level and can't be changed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What really annoys me about Thinkpad keyboards is the awkward placement of the fn key .
It is placed where the left Ctrl key is normally placed and I ca n't get used to it because my other laptop uses the traditional placement .
To add salt to the wound , KeyTweak and similar programs are no use because it seems that the fn key is mapped at some lower level and ca n't be changed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What really annoys me about Thinkpad keyboards is the awkward placement of the fn key.
It is placed where the left Ctrl key is normally placed and I can't get used to it because my other laptop uses the traditional placement.
To add salt to the wound, KeyTweak and similar programs are no use because it seems that the fn key is mapped at some lower level and can't be changed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510111</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>bidule</author>
	<datestamp>1246212960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div><p>There's pills for that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a better idea Lenovo : enlarge the : U , O , Y , K , C , U , F keys .
; ) There 's pills for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.
;)There's pills for that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516789</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1246301820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.</p></div><p>I have tiny hands, you insensitive clod!<br> <br>Honestly, though, I do have fingers that are short enough that is uncomfortable for me to hold down the shift key while trying to type more than a few capital letters at a time.  For me, adding two key presses to an all-capitals header that I am including in function comments is much more efficient than either typing the whole thing at half speed because I can barely reach the needed keys or switching back and forth between shift keys every few characters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.I have tiny hands , you insensitive clod !
Honestly , though , I do have fingers that are short enough that is uncomfortable for me to hold down the shift key while trying to type more than a few capital letters at a time .
For me , adding two key presses to an all-capitals header that I am including in function comments is much more efficient than either typing the whole thing at half speed because I can barely reach the needed keys or switching back and forth between shift keys every few characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.I have tiny hands, you insensitive clod!
Honestly, though, I do have fingers that are short enough that is uncomfortable for me to hold down the shift key while trying to type more than a few capital letters at a time.
For me, adding two key presses to an all-capitals header that I am including in function comments is much more efficient than either typing the whole thing at half speed because I can barely reach the needed keys or switching back and forth between shift keys every few characters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512651</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Ciaran Power</author>
	<datestamp>1246282140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This anti-caps-lock thing is retarded. Caps lock makes it easier to type things in ALL\_CAPITALS, which is useful for certain things:<br><br>SELECT foo FROM `bar` LEFT OUTER JOIN `junk`<br>#define SOME\_BIG\_STUPID\_CONSTANT<br>\%token TODAY IS A NICE DAY TO DIE<br>#ifndef BLEARGH\_H<br>#define BLEARGH\_H<br><br>I find those much easier to type with caps lock than holding shift (even toggling caps lock between words for the sql). Holding down shift (just tried it there) interferes with your normal typing, pressing caps lock doesn't. Any argument that "well, I sometimes press caps lock by accident..." is also stupid, just learn to type and don't press it by accident. For people who like to use it, it's a useful key. For others: what harm in keeping it?<br><br>On another note, I wish keyboard companies (not laptop companies) would stick to the standard (us, uk, whereever) keyboard layout and stop fucking with it. It's a problem when you can't walk into a small computer shop and find a keyboard with a standard layout, instead you get one with half size shift keys, wrongly-shaped enter keys, # keys where they're not supposed to be etc. etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This anti-caps-lock thing is retarded .
Caps lock makes it easier to type things in ALL \ _CAPITALS , which is useful for certain things : SELECT foo FROM ` bar ` LEFT OUTER JOIN ` junk ` # define SOME \ _BIG \ _STUPID \ _CONSTANT \ % token TODAY IS A NICE DAY TO DIE # ifndef BLEARGH \ _H # define BLEARGH \ _HI find those much easier to type with caps lock than holding shift ( even toggling caps lock between words for the sql ) .
Holding down shift ( just tried it there ) interferes with your normal typing , pressing caps lock does n't .
Any argument that " well , I sometimes press caps lock by accident... " is also stupid , just learn to type and do n't press it by accident .
For people who like to use it , it 's a useful key .
For others : what harm in keeping it ? On another note , I wish keyboard companies ( not laptop companies ) would stick to the standard ( us , uk , whereever ) keyboard layout and stop fucking with it .
It 's a problem when you ca n't walk into a small computer shop and find a keyboard with a standard layout , instead you get one with half size shift keys , wrongly-shaped enter keys , # keys where they 're not supposed to be etc .
etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This anti-caps-lock thing is retarded.
Caps lock makes it easier to type things in ALL\_CAPITALS, which is useful for certain things:SELECT foo FROM `bar` LEFT OUTER JOIN `junk`#define SOME\_BIG\_STUPID\_CONSTANT\%token TODAY IS A NICE DAY TO DIE#ifndef BLEARGH\_H#define BLEARGH\_HI find those much easier to type with caps lock than holding shift (even toggling caps lock between words for the sql).
Holding down shift (just tried it there) interferes with your normal typing, pressing caps lock doesn't.
Any argument that "well, I sometimes press caps lock by accident..." is also stupid, just learn to type and don't press it by accident.
For people who like to use it, it's a useful key.
For others: what harm in keeping it?On another note, I wish keyboard companies (not laptop companies) would stick to the standard (us, uk, whereever) keyboard layout and stop fucking with it.
It's a problem when you can't walk into a small computer shop and find a keyboard with a standard layout, instead you get one with half size shift keys, wrongly-shaped enter keys, # keys where they're not supposed to be etc.
etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524283</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>alcourt</author>
	<datestamp>1246297080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I type heavily on my macbook with the new style keyboard, and find it is one of the best laptop keyboards I've ever used.  The keys stand up very well to prolonged typing and don't feel like they will start sliding around slightly which is one of the habits I've seen of most previous model keyboards of different laptops.</p><p>I'm usually typing full paragraphs, not coding, so my typing habits may be enough different to make a difference to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I type heavily on my macbook with the new style keyboard , and find it is one of the best laptop keyboards I 've ever used .
The keys stand up very well to prolonged typing and do n't feel like they will start sliding around slightly which is one of the habits I 've seen of most previous model keyboards of different laptops.I 'm usually typing full paragraphs , not coding , so my typing habits may be enough different to make a difference to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I type heavily on my macbook with the new style keyboard, and find it is one of the best laptop keyboards I've ever used.
The keys stand up very well to prolonged typing and don't feel like they will start sliding around slightly which is one of the habits I've seen of most previous model keyboards of different laptops.I'm usually typing full paragraphs, not coding, so my typing habits may be enough different to make a difference to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509631</id>
	<title>wAIT! i need THAT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use my caps lock key when I enter (into my accounting system)  the description of parts purchased at Fry's Electronics, which are often WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use my caps lock key when I enter ( into my accounting system ) the description of parts purchased at Fry 's Electronics , which are often WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use my caps lock key when I enter (into my accounting system)  the description of parts purchased at Fry's Electronics, which are often WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509949</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>ToasterMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246211400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign everything have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason: No delete key.</p><p>There's a backspace key labeled 'Delete,' which I cannot figure out the rationale of for the life of me. My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled "delete" as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.</p></div><p>A full size Mac keyboard has delete where the PC backspace key is, and "delete -&gt;" where the PC delete key is.  What is the confusion there?  It is not labeled the same, as forward delete has a right arrow picture on it.  Familiarity with PC's aside, delete makes more sense.  Delete the last character entered, or the character behind your cursor if you moved it.    Explain how "backspacing" the previous character or "deleting" the character\_ after\_ your cursor makes more sense.  The PC scheme only made sense when the cursor was an entire character width, not a thin bar.  Then, you "deleted" the character UNDER the cursor, or moved it backwards a space.  Macs have standardized on thin text cursors for quite some time now but PC's...  some things just never change for decades because there is no consensus, and people forget why things were done in the first place.  Take this backspace dogma for example.  It no longer makes sense, but you defend it because...  you don't even know why.</p><p>BTW, on a Mac laptop, delete is where it is on a full size, and fn-delete is a forward delete.   Act surprised.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Also irritating is that <b>Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard</b>, while their wired keyboards default to the godawful "compact" model. This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good, are visually appealing, and take up a very small footprint on my desk. <b>Logitech's keyboards are hideous, enormous</b>, don't use bluetooth, and very often actually <b>cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple</b>.</p></div><p>Maybe Apple was on to something with the compact wireless keyboard then...<br>I have a full sized wireless Logtitech keyboard, and I'll tell you..  it doesn't make sense..  unless you never move it.  I've gotten over this and moved on.  Big ass keyboard.. taking up way to much space on the coffee table..  ugh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign everything have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason : No delete key.There 's a backspace key labeled 'Delete, ' which I can not figure out the rationale of for the life of me .
My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled " delete " as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.A full size Mac keyboard has delete where the PC backspace key is , and " delete - &gt; " where the PC delete key is .
What is the confusion there ?
It is not labeled the same , as forward delete has a right arrow picture on it .
Familiarity with PC 's aside , delete makes more sense .
Delete the last character entered , or the character behind your cursor if you moved it .
Explain how " backspacing " the previous character or " deleting " the character \ _ after \ _ your cursor makes more sense .
The PC scheme only made sense when the cursor was an entire character width , not a thin bar .
Then , you " deleted " the character UNDER the cursor , or moved it backwards a space .
Macs have standardized on thin text cursors for quite some time now but PC 's... some things just never change for decades because there is no consensus , and people forget why things were done in the first place .
Take this backspace dogma for example .
It no longer makes sense , but you defend it because... you do n't even know why.BTW , on a Mac laptop , delete is where it is on a full size , and fn-delete is a forward delete .
Act surprised.Also irritating is that Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard , while their wired keyboards default to the godawful " compact " model .
This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple 's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good , are visually appealing , and take up a very small footprint on my desk .
Logitech 's keyboards are hideous , enormous , do n't use bluetooth , and very often actually cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple.Maybe Apple was on to something with the compact wireless keyboard then...I have a full sized wireless Logtitech keyboard , and I 'll tell you.. it does n't make sense.. unless you never move it .
I 've gotten over this and moved on .
Big ass keyboard.. taking up way to much space on the coffee table.. ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign everything have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason: No delete key.There's a backspace key labeled 'Delete,' which I cannot figure out the rationale of for the life of me.
My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled "delete" as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.A full size Mac keyboard has delete where the PC backspace key is, and "delete -&gt;" where the PC delete key is.
What is the confusion there?
It is not labeled the same, as forward delete has a right arrow picture on it.
Familiarity with PC's aside, delete makes more sense.
Delete the last character entered, or the character behind your cursor if you moved it.
Explain how "backspacing" the previous character or "deleting" the character\_ after\_ your cursor makes more sense.
The PC scheme only made sense when the cursor was an entire character width, not a thin bar.
Then, you "deleted" the character UNDER the cursor, or moved it backwards a space.
Macs have standardized on thin text cursors for quite some time now but PC's...  some things just never change for decades because there is no consensus, and people forget why things were done in the first place.
Take this backspace dogma for example.
It no longer makes sense, but you defend it because...  you don't even know why.BTW, on a Mac laptop, delete is where it is on a full size, and fn-delete is a forward delete.
Act surprised.Also irritating is that Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard, while their wired keyboards default to the godawful "compact" model.
This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good, are visually appealing, and take up a very small footprint on my desk.
Logitech's keyboards are hideous, enormous, don't use bluetooth, and very often actually cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple.Maybe Apple was on to something with the compact wireless keyboard then...I have a full sized wireless Logtitech keyboard, and I'll tell you..  it doesn't make sense..  unless you never move it.
I've gotten over this and moved on.
Big ass keyboard.. taking up way to much space on the coffee table..  ugh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512767</id>
	<title>I only use Delete...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246282920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when pressing ctrl-alt-delete.</p><p>If I need to erase something I always use the backspace button which is already a big key.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when pressing ctrl-alt-delete.If I need to erase something I always use the backspace button which is already a big key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when pressing ctrl-alt-delete.If I need to erase something I always use the backspace button which is already a big key.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>corsec67</author>
	<datestamp>1246206000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, the key to the left of "A" should be Ctrl. That is one think about the OLPC XO-1 keyboard I like. The actual keys are crap, though.</p><p>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , the key to the left of " A " should be Ctrl .
That is one think about the OLPC XO-1 keyboard I like .
The actual keys are crap , though.They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, the key to the left of "A" should be Ctrl.
That is one think about the OLPC XO-1 keyboard I like.
The actual keys are crap, though.They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510519</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246216560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.</i></p><p>Here's a nickel, kid.  Go get yourself a real operating system.  One whose password fields pop up a little icon to indicate that Caps Lock is active.</p><p>-- supercilious Mac user</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and , more importantly , reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.Here 's a nickel , kid .
Go get yourself a real operating system .
One whose password fields pop up a little icon to indicate that Caps Lock is active.-- supercilious Mac user</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.Here's a nickel, kid.
Go get yourself a real operating system.
One whose password fields pop up a little icon to indicate that Caps Lock is active.-- supercilious Mac user</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509563</id>
	<title>You will need it for Windows 7</title>
	<author>iCantSpell</author>
	<datestamp>1246207920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New, Windows 7 + Lenovo! Now you can ctrl+alt+del at half the speed of Vista!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New , Windows 7 + Lenovo !
Now you can ctrl + alt + del at half the speed of Vista !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New, Windows 7 + Lenovo!
Now you can ctrl+alt+del at half the speed of Vista!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510401</id>
	<title>Ctrl key ctrl key ctrl key</title>
	<author>Tenant129</author>
	<datestamp>1246215600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw the esc and delete. Get that stupid function key out of the prime real estate in the bottom left and put the control key where it rightly belongs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw the esc and delete .
Get that stupid function key out of the prime real estate in the bottom left and put the control key where it rightly belongs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw the esc and delete.
Get that stupid function key out of the prime real estate in the bottom left and put the control key where it rightly belongs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511871</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246274580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use them all, well, except Break.<br>But i am sure i shall find a use for Break sooner or later.</p><p>I use Autohotkey a lot for hotkeys, macros and the like.<br>My Numpad has 6 settings.  Beat that!<br>Ins has been disabled, except from the ability to pause a macro recording. (yes, strange use, but i had no use for it anywhere else)<br>F1 key has been disabled from opening help.  I HATE help windows popping up on F1.<br>Shift+caps brings up a tooltip with mouse position, again and it will remove it.<br>Win+click 2 points will draw a line, in case there is no line tool in whatever i am using. (10 second delay before it is reset, or both win keys)</p><p>Hell, this is barely 5\% of the things i have setup.<br>I ran out of useful keys that i went to the point of setting up hotkeys on SINGLE keys via multi-keypresses. (have 3 separate ones for that at the moment)</p><p>As you can see, i use my keyboard a LOT.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use them all , well , except Break.But i am sure i shall find a use for Break sooner or later.I use Autohotkey a lot for hotkeys , macros and the like.My Numpad has 6 settings .
Beat that ! Ins has been disabled , except from the ability to pause a macro recording .
( yes , strange use , but i had no use for it anywhere else ) F1 key has been disabled from opening help .
I HATE help windows popping up on F1.Shift + caps brings up a tooltip with mouse position , again and it will remove it.Win + click 2 points will draw a line , in case there is no line tool in whatever i am using .
( 10 second delay before it is reset , or both win keys ) Hell , this is barely 5 \ % of the things i have setup.I ran out of useful keys that i went to the point of setting up hotkeys on SINGLE keys via multi-keypresses .
( have 3 separate ones for that at the moment ) As you can see , i use my keyboard a LOT .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use them all, well, except Break.But i am sure i shall find a use for Break sooner or later.I use Autohotkey a lot for hotkeys, macros and the like.My Numpad has 6 settings.
Beat that!Ins has been disabled, except from the ability to pause a macro recording.
(yes, strange use, but i had no use for it anywhere else)F1 key has been disabled from opening help.
I HATE help windows popping up on F1.Shift+caps brings up a tooltip with mouse position, again and it will remove it.Win+click 2 points will draw a line, in case there is no line tool in whatever i am using.
(10 second delay before it is reset, or both win keys)Hell, this is barely 5\% of the things i have setup.I ran out of useful keys that i went to the point of setting up hotkeys on SINGLE keys via multi-keypresses.
(have 3 separate ones for that at the moment)As you can see, i use my keyboard a LOT.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513659</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246288680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>NOBODY, absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance, the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow.</p></div><p>My clicky is in the dishwasher.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>NOBODY , absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance , the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow.My clicky is in the dishwasher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NOBODY, absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance, the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow.My clicky is in the dishwasher.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510811</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1246305720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Num lock is still slightly useful in case of some laptop keyboards that have numeric keypad and don't have separate arrow buttons. If you want to get rid of keys, better start with Scr lock and Print screen. Both of those are used so rarely that they don't deserve a special button (never mind a status light).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Num lock is still slightly useful in case of some laptop keyboards that have numeric keypad and do n't have separate arrow buttons .
If you want to get rid of keys , better start with Scr lock and Print screen .
Both of those are used so rarely that they do n't deserve a special button ( never mind a status light ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Num lock is still slightly useful in case of some laptop keyboards that have numeric keypad and don't have separate arrow buttons.
If you want to get rid of keys, better start with Scr lock and Print screen.
Both of those are used so rarely that they don't deserve a special button (never mind a status light).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509439</id>
	<title>I did have a really funny comment on here...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but after years, I finally noticed a really small Delete key hidden on this keyboard! I was so overjoyed that I had to test it out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but after years , I finally noticed a really small Delete key hidden on this keyboard !
I was so overjoyed that I had to test it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but after years, I finally noticed a really small Delete key hidden on this keyboard!
I was so overjoyed that I had to test it out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510529</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246216680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This information is a reality-subliminal, LENOVA = The New (you), DELETE (your porn) and ESCAPE(the consequences)</p><p>SIGS ARE PRETENTIOUS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This information is a reality-subliminal , LENOVA = The New ( you ) , DELETE ( your porn ) and ESCAPE ( the consequences ) SIGS ARE PRETENTIOUS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This information is a reality-subliminal, LENOVA = The New (you), DELETE (your porn) and ESCAPE(the consequences)SIGS ARE PRETENTIOUS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510913</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Andreas Mayer</author>
	<datestamp>1246306680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent.</p></div><p>They didn't. When Mac OS was created, there was no Windows. And obviously no Windows key.</p><p>Since Windows was made to work on DOS PCs, Microsoft had to support the existing keyboards - which lacked a specific command key. So they went and (mis-)used the Control key instead.</p><p>Only when Windows became the de-facto standard OS for generic PCs was when they introduced a Windows key. Sadly they went with the easiest route and did *not* remap shortcuts from Control to the Windows key. Which is why the Windows key on Windows is still largely useless.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent.They did n't .
When Mac OS was created , there was no Windows .
And obviously no Windows key.Since Windows was made to work on DOS PCs , Microsoft had to support the existing keyboards - which lacked a specific command key .
So they went and ( mis- ) used the Control key instead.Only when Windows became the de-facto standard OS for generic PCs was when they introduced a Windows key .
Sadly they went with the easiest route and did * not * remap shortcuts from Control to the Windows key .
Which is why the Windows key on Windows is still largely useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent.They didn't.
When Mac OS was created, there was no Windows.
And obviously no Windows key.Since Windows was made to work on DOS PCs, Microsoft had to support the existing keyboards - which lacked a specific command key.
So they went and (mis-)used the Control key instead.Only when Windows became the de-facto standard OS for generic PCs was when they introduced a Windows key.
Sadly they went with the easiest route and did *not* remap shortcuts from Control to the Windows key.
Which is why the Windows key on Windows is still largely useless.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510321</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>SL Baur</author>
	<datestamp>1246214940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design. Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but the keys on keyboards that I've used in the past with ugly pictures on them make great Hyper and Super keys in emacs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For my money , I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design .
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: ) I 'm not sure exactly what you mean , but the keys on keyboards that I 've used in the past with ugly pictures on them make great Hyper and Super keys in emacs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but the keys on keyboards that I've used in the past with ugly pictures on them make great Hyper and Super keys in emacs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510425</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246215900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM was virtually the last holdout on not having windows keys.  I assumed the second lenovo got ahold of the thinkpad line that would be the first to go and I wasn't disappointed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>Changing it back IMHO would be the best change they can make.  I'm not saying that I don't like the windows key. It is actually a little bit useful at times however remapping one of the redundant alt keys is in my opinion works great and a superior solution to smaller control keys.</p><p>After all of these years with a T41 I'm still having trouble with the control key shrink on my new T400<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(  I guess I'll get used to it eventually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM was virtually the last holdout on not having windows keys .
I assumed the second lenovo got ahold of the thinkpad line that would be the first to go and I was n't disappointed : ( Changing it back IMHO would be the best change they can make .
I 'm not saying that I do n't like the windows key .
It is actually a little bit useful at times however remapping one of the redundant alt keys is in my opinion works great and a superior solution to smaller control keys.After all of these years with a T41 I 'm still having trouble with the control key shrink on my new T400 : ( I guess I 'll get used to it eventually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM was virtually the last holdout on not having windows keys.
I assumed the second lenovo got ahold of the thinkpad line that would be the first to go and I wasn't disappointed :(Changing it back IMHO would be the best change they can make.
I'm not saying that I don't like the windows key.
It is actually a little bit useful at times however remapping one of the redundant alt keys is in my opinion works great and a superior solution to smaller control keys.After all of these years with a T41 I'm still having trouble with the control key shrink on my new T400 :(  I guess I'll get used to it eventually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512377</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1246279680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would like a keyboard built like Model M, but with the full complement of modifier keys, so i can map them as i currently do with Control in caps lock, then along the bottom row Greek, front, meta, space, alt, super, hyper, lock (toggles lock on shift, front or Greek when chorded). The other things which would be nice would be a metal shell and keys, and a drainage channel like on the modern imitations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like a keyboard built like Model M , but with the full complement of modifier keys , so i can map them as i currently do with Control in caps lock , then along the bottom row Greek , front , meta , space , alt , super , hyper , lock ( toggles lock on shift , front or Greek when chorded ) .
The other things which would be nice would be a metal shell and keys , and a drainage channel like on the modern imitations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like a keyboard built like Model M, but with the full complement of modifier keys, so i can map them as i currently do with Control in caps lock, then along the bottom row Greek, front, meta, space, alt, super, hyper, lock (toggles lock on shift, front or Greek when chorded).
The other things which would be nice would be a metal shell and keys, and a drainage channel like on the modern imitations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510699</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Geirzinho</author>
	<datestamp>1246218120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key (which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key. i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.</p></div><p>I think you're mistaken.  You clearly don't touch-type, which is impossible if you commit one finger just to holding down a shift key.</p><p>You should be able to get a lot higher typing rate with training, and then you'll start to appreciate the caps lock for stuff like SQL queries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key ( which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key ) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key .
i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.I think you 're mistaken .
You clearly do n't touch-type , which is impossible if you commit one finger just to holding down a shift key.You should be able to get a lot higher typing rate with training , and then you 'll start to appreciate the caps lock for stuff like SQL queries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key (which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key.
i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.I think you're mistaken.
You clearly don't touch-type, which is impossible if you commit one finger just to holding down a shift key.You should be able to get a lot higher typing rate with training, and then you'll start to appreciate the caps lock for stuff like SQL queries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510355</id>
	<title>19th Century Technology?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1246215180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p></div><p>Yeah. Typing those escape sequences back in the 1800's was a real bother.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Yeah .
Typing those escape sequences back in the 1800 's was a real bother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Yeah.
Typing those escape sequences back in the 1800's was a real bother.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514739</id>
	<title>"The 19th century"?</title>
	<author>kuei12</author>
	<datestamp>1246293660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What did they need delete and escape keys for in the 19th century?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What did they need delete and escape keys for in the 19th century ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What did they need delete and escape keys for in the 19th century?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511221</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246267200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have obviously not used the IBM Type 3472-G. It has everything the Model M has, but over three times as many function keys, about twice as many symbols, a numeric keypad equipped with period, tab, comma and space, better placed arrow keys (a full cross, with Rule/topleft in the center)... it even has colours! The only reason people <em>think</em> they prefer the Model M is that PCs were fitted with it.<br>The additional symbols include math, logic, and some greek. It even has separate factorial and exclamation point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have obviously not used the IBM Type 3472-G. It has everything the Model M has , but over three times as many function keys , about twice as many symbols , a numeric keypad equipped with period , tab , comma and space , better placed arrow keys ( a full cross , with Rule/topleft in the center ) ... it even has colours !
The only reason people think they prefer the Model M is that PCs were fitted with it.The additional symbols include math , logic , and some greek .
It even has separate factorial and exclamation point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have obviously not used the IBM Type 3472-G. It has everything the Model M has, but over three times as many function keys, about twice as many symbols, a numeric keypad equipped with period, tab, comma and space, better placed arrow keys (a full cross, with Rule/topleft in the center)... it even has colours!
The only reason people think they prefer the Model M is that PCs were fitted with it.The additional symbols include math, logic, and some greek.
It even has separate factorial and exclamation point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509345</id>
	<title>caps lock</title>
	<author>Bitch-Face Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1246206000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>is cruise control for cool</htmltext>
<tokenext>is cruise control for cool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is cruise control for cool</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513809</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246289280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is NumLock hated?  Most users seem to either leave it permanently on or off.  It would be nice to allow a default when creating a new user account (my Solaris workstation defaults with NumLock off, Windows with it on).  Still wouldn't say that it is a huge issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is NumLock hated ?
Most users seem to either leave it permanently on or off .
It would be nice to allow a default when creating a new user account ( my Solaris workstation defaults with NumLock off , Windows with it on ) .
Still would n't say that it is a huge issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is NumLock hated?
Most users seem to either leave it permanently on or off.
It would be nice to allow a default when creating a new user account (my Solaris workstation defaults with NumLock off, Windows with it on).
Still wouldn't say that it is a huge issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512387</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1246279740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In fact, why not combine them into a unique oversized (and possibly bright red) "panic button"? But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits; not the failings of the operating system they control.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why the heck not?  Ctrl-Alt-Del hardly reflects upon the failings of Microsoft anymore, and in fact, reflects upon progressive user habits.  It's been a long long long time since Ctrl-Alt-Del actually had any immediate affect like the reset button does now.  Only time that key combo is useful for that is when the system is booting, before the OS starts up.  If I can remember correctly, even Windows 95 had you press it twice in a row to reset the system.  I seem to remember something like that.  It's been awhile.  Windows 2000, XP, and Vista all use it primarily as a key-combo to access what I guess you can call a top-level UI for the system.  Locking the system, changing the password, logging off, task manager, shutting down, etc. are all accessed by this "button".</p><p>As an administrator and a programmer I find myself constantly using that key combo all day long.  More often to lock systems, logging off, and shutting down.  Less often I need access to the task manager to view processes and shut them down, but that might not be a failing of Microsoft, and more a failing of the individual program.</p><p>In fact, when Microsoft *really* acts up the Ctrl-Alt-Del combo isn't actually very useful at all.  The task manager either won't start since it is already foobar'd up past the point of no return, or it cannot even respond.  You have no choice, BUT to hit the reset button, or wait on the chance the system *might* come back to you.</p><p>Having the "big red button" on the keyboard might actually be useful for a lot of people out there, and that is not a negative comment about Microsoft.</p><p>The whole Ctrl-Alt-Del joke being used to describe Microsoft's failings is rather peculiar since you would have to be old enough to remember what it was used for in times long since past<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  It's like listening to a bunch of old farts tell jokes with words that have long since lost their original meaning and laughing anyways<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Give it a little more time and there will be young programmers complaining they don't get the joke!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , why not combine them into a unique oversized ( and possibly bright red ) " panic button " ?
But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits ; not the failings of the operating system they control.Why the heck not ?
Ctrl-Alt-Del hardly reflects upon the failings of Microsoft anymore , and in fact , reflects upon progressive user habits .
It 's been a long long long time since Ctrl-Alt-Del actually had any immediate affect like the reset button does now .
Only time that key combo is useful for that is when the system is booting , before the OS starts up .
If I can remember correctly , even Windows 95 had you press it twice in a row to reset the system .
I seem to remember something like that .
It 's been awhile .
Windows 2000 , XP , and Vista all use it primarily as a key-combo to access what I guess you can call a top-level UI for the system .
Locking the system , changing the password , logging off , task manager , shutting down , etc .
are all accessed by this " button " .As an administrator and a programmer I find myself constantly using that key combo all day long .
More often to lock systems , logging off , and shutting down .
Less often I need access to the task manager to view processes and shut them down , but that might not be a failing of Microsoft , and more a failing of the individual program.In fact , when Microsoft * really * acts up the Ctrl-Alt-Del combo is n't actually very useful at all .
The task manager either wo n't start since it is already foobar 'd up past the point of no return , or it can not even respond .
You have no choice , BUT to hit the reset button , or wait on the chance the system * might * come back to you.Having the " big red button " on the keyboard might actually be useful for a lot of people out there , and that is not a negative comment about Microsoft.The whole Ctrl-Alt-Del joke being used to describe Microsoft 's failings is rather peculiar since you would have to be old enough to remember what it was used for in times long since past : ) It 's like listening to a bunch of old farts tell jokes with words that have long since lost their original meaning and laughing anyways : ) Give it a little more time and there will be young programmers complaining they do n't get the joke !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, why not combine them into a unique oversized (and possibly bright red) "panic button"?
But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits; not the failings of the operating system they control.Why the heck not?
Ctrl-Alt-Del hardly reflects upon the failings of Microsoft anymore, and in fact, reflects upon progressive user habits.
It's been a long long long time since Ctrl-Alt-Del actually had any immediate affect like the reset button does now.
Only time that key combo is useful for that is when the system is booting, before the OS starts up.
If I can remember correctly, even Windows 95 had you press it twice in a row to reset the system.
I seem to remember something like that.
It's been awhile.
Windows 2000, XP, and Vista all use it primarily as a key-combo to access what I guess you can call a top-level UI for the system.
Locking the system, changing the password, logging off, task manager, shutting down, etc.
are all accessed by this "button".As an administrator and a programmer I find myself constantly using that key combo all day long.
More often to lock systems, logging off, and shutting down.
Less often I need access to the task manager to view processes and shut them down, but that might not be a failing of Microsoft, and more a failing of the individual program.In fact, when Microsoft *really* acts up the Ctrl-Alt-Del combo isn't actually very useful at all.
The task manager either won't start since it is already foobar'd up past the point of no return, or it cannot even respond.
You have no choice, BUT to hit the reset button, or wait on the chance the system *might* come back to you.Having the "big red button" on the keyboard might actually be useful for a lot of people out there, and that is not a negative comment about Microsoft.The whole Ctrl-Alt-Del joke being used to describe Microsoft's failings is rather peculiar since you would have to be old enough to remember what it was used for in times long since past :)  It's like listening to a bunch of old farts tell jokes with words that have long since lost their original meaning and laughing anyways :)Give it a little more time and there will be young programmers complaining they don't get the joke!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>DirePickle</author>
	<datestamp>1246209840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, man. There is <i>nothing</i> I hate worse than typing on than one of those Logitech keyboards that shuffle that whole block around. I can never find the home or end keys!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , man .
There is nothing I hate worse than typing on than one of those Logitech keyboards that shuffle that whole block around .
I can never find the home or end keys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, man.
There is nothing I hate worse than typing on than one of those Logitech keyboards that shuffle that whole block around.
I can never find the home or end keys!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509617</id>
	<title>Re:19th century?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and what do you call the part of the typewriter with the keys?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and what do you call the part of the typewriter with the keys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and what do you call the part of the typewriter with the keys?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513163</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1246285380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly enough, Windows XP does that.  I might have cursed the tiny keyboard that caused me to hit the CAPLOCK, but I WAS told about it by the OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough , Windows XP does that .
I might have cursed the tiny keyboard that caused me to hit the CAPLOCK , but I WAS told about it by the OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough, Windows XP does that.
I might have cursed the tiny keyboard that caused me to hit the CAPLOCK, but I WAS told about it by the OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510103</id>
	<title>Re:Nineteenth Century</title>
	<author>Reeses</author>
	<datestamp>1246212840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your UID isn't low enough to be that old.</p><p>You're lucky your keyboards had keys. We had to mash the letters into the paper by hand, with a hammer.</p><p>-R</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your UID is n't low enough to be that old.You 're lucky your keyboards had keys .
We had to mash the letters into the paper by hand , with a hammer.-R</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your UID isn't low enough to be that old.You're lucky your keyboards had keys.
We had to mash the letters into the paper by hand, with a hammer.-R</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512887</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>Akita24</author>
	<datestamp>1246283700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's about time they updated the hardware to handle all the deletes of Adware, CrapWare and other crap they not only ship with the box but now install as "updates."</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time they updated the hardware to handle all the deletes of Adware , CrapWare and other crap they not only ship with the box but now install as " updates .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time they updated the hardware to handle all the deletes of Adware, CrapWare and other crap they not only ship with the box but now install as "updates.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511485</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>torako</author>
	<datestamp>1246270860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure how Windows does it, but OS X shows a little "Caps Lock" symbol inside the password input field whenever caps lock is on to prevent exactly that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how Windows does it , but OS X shows a little " Caps Lock " symbol inside the password input field whenever caps lock is on to prevent exactly that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how Windows does it, but OS X shows a little "Caps Lock" symbol inside the password input field whenever caps lock is on to prevent exactly that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510559</id>
	<title>Caps Lock.</title>
	<author>Anonymatt</author>
	<datestamp>1246216740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Caps Lock all the time.</p><p>Backspace enlargement? Maybe you could just make some software that would know when you were hitting backslash instead of backspace. That would be helpful in word processors and things.</p><p>As for the Esc key, I thought it was only used in movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Caps Lock all the time.Backspace enlargement ?
Maybe you could just make some software that would know when you were hitting backslash instead of backspace .
That would be helpful in word processors and things.As for the Esc key , I thought it was only used in movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Caps Lock all the time.Backspace enlargement?
Maybe you could just make some software that would know when you were hitting backslash instead of backspace.
That would be helpful in word processors and things.As for the Esc key, I thought it was only used in movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510025</id>
	<title>KeyTronic</title>
	<author>CrashNBrn</author>
	<datestamp>1246212120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>KeyTronic gives the Model-M a run for its money.<br>
Especially the KT-800P2
<a href="http://www.keytronicems.com/home/shop/shop.asp?h\_ck=THS859" title="keytronicems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.keytronicems.com/home/shop/shop.asp?h\_ck=THS859</a> [keytronicems.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>KeyTronic gives the Model-M a run for its money .
Especially the KT-800P2 http : //www.keytronicems.com/home/shop/shop.asp ? h \ _ck = THS859 [ keytronicems.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KeyTronic gives the Model-M a run for its money.
Especially the KT-800P2
http://www.keytronicems.com/home/shop/shop.asp?h\_ck=THS859 [keytronicems.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510127</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1246213140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.</i></p><p>Home and end?! WTF? I use those keys all the freaking time. I probably use them more than infrequent letters like Q and Z.</p><p>Hell, I used it without thinking about it to scroll to the beginning of this post (ctrl-home) so I could past that quote from you in, since I had other stuff typed before and am going through your post out of order but don't want my post to reflect that.</p><p>Delete I also use fairly often. Insert less often, but still time-to-time.</p><p><i>Do you use your scroll lock and break key? Lose them, too.</i></p><p>Yes, I do. Scroll lock admittedly even less frequently, but it makes the terminal scroll with the arrow keys and page up/down. Lots of other people will comment that it performs the same function in Excel. Break is used with ctrl to cancel builds in Visual Studio; I use it more than I do Print Screen.</p><p><i>How many function keys do you really need? TWELVE?!?!</i></p><p>I actually use all of them as virtual desktop identifiers; Win-F## will switch to that desktop.</p><p>Granted, I would be happy with removing a couple of them (maybe down to 8, but not less) if they were grouped differently so that more were at the ends of a group. (I use the keys at the end of a group far more because they are much easier to hit.)</p><p>Don't think the rest of us want our keyboards dumbed down just because you don't use yours to its full potential.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for getting rid of insert , delete , home , and end.Home and end ? !
WTF ? I use those keys all the freaking time .
I probably use them more than infrequent letters like Q and Z.Hell , I used it without thinking about it to scroll to the beginning of this post ( ctrl-home ) so I could past that quote from you in , since I had other stuff typed before and am going through your post out of order but do n't want my post to reflect that.Delete I also use fairly often .
Insert less often , but still time-to-time.Do you use your scroll lock and break key ?
Lose them , too.Yes , I do .
Scroll lock admittedly even less frequently , but it makes the terminal scroll with the arrow keys and page up/down .
Lots of other people will comment that it performs the same function in Excel .
Break is used with ctrl to cancel builds in Visual Studio ; I use it more than I do Print Screen.How many function keys do you really need ?
TWELVE ? ! ? ! I actually use all of them as virtual desktop identifiers ; Win-F # # will switch to that desktop.Granted , I would be happy with removing a couple of them ( maybe down to 8 , but not less ) if they were grouped differently so that more were at the ends of a group .
( I use the keys at the end of a group far more because they are much easier to hit .
) Do n't think the rest of us want our keyboards dumbed down just because you do n't use yours to its full potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.Home and end?!
WTF? I use those keys all the freaking time.
I probably use them more than infrequent letters like Q and Z.Hell, I used it without thinking about it to scroll to the beginning of this post (ctrl-home) so I could past that quote from you in, since I had other stuff typed before and am going through your post out of order but don't want my post to reflect that.Delete I also use fairly often.
Insert less often, but still time-to-time.Do you use your scroll lock and break key?
Lose them, too.Yes, I do.
Scroll lock admittedly even less frequently, but it makes the terminal scroll with the arrow keys and page up/down.
Lots of other people will comment that it performs the same function in Excel.
Break is used with ctrl to cancel builds in Visual Studio; I use it more than I do Print Screen.How many function keys do you really need?
TWELVE?!?!I actually use all of them as virtual desktop identifiers; Win-F## will switch to that desktop.Granted, I would be happy with removing a couple of them (maybe down to 8, but not less) if they were grouped differently so that more were at the ends of a group.
(I use the keys at the end of a group far more because they are much easier to hit.
)Don't think the rest of us want our keyboards dumbed down just because you don't use yours to its full potential.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>shay\_rossignol</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wasn't aware there were keyboards in the 19th century...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't aware there were keyboards in the 19th century.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't aware there were keyboards in the 19th century...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511087</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>Zedrick</author>
	<datestamp>1246308720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seconded. My Logitech X-blahasomething broke a few weeks ago. First I replaced it with a spare usb keyboard I had lying around, which worked well enough. However, a week after that I found a Model M (1391411 to be exact, the Swedish version of 1391401) in the attic, and thought "why not"?<br> <br> <b>Wow.</b> <br> <br>I had totally forgotten how great these things are to type on, not to mention how easy it was to clean it after 10+ years in a dusty attic - just take off the keys and scrub them in the sink!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seconded .
My Logitech X-blahasomething broke a few weeks ago .
First I replaced it with a spare usb keyboard I had lying around , which worked well enough .
However , a week after that I found a Model M ( 1391411 to be exact , the Swedish version of 1391401 ) in the attic , and thought " why not " ?
Wow. I had totally forgotten how great these things are to type on , not to mention how easy it was to clean it after 10 + years in a dusty attic - just take off the keys and scrub them in the sink !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seconded.
My Logitech X-blahasomething broke a few weeks ago.
First I replaced it with a spare usb keyboard I had lying around, which worked well enough.
However, a week after that I found a Model M (1391411 to be exact, the Swedish version of 1391401) in the attic, and thought "why not"?
Wow.  I had totally forgotten how great these things are to type on, not to mention how easy it was to clean it after 10+ years in a dusty attic - just take off the keys and scrub them in the sink!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509825</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Mad Merlin</author>
	<datestamp>1246210260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.  Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>Yes, absolutely. Lenovo's biggest mistake is tarnishing the ThinkPad keyboard with a 'doze key. The second biggest mistake is making (almost) all ThinkPads shortscreen, but my understanding is that they were essentially forced down that path by their suppliers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For my money , I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design .
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: ) Yes , absolutely .
Lenovo 's biggest mistake is tarnishing the ThinkPad keyboard with a 'doze key .
The second biggest mistake is making ( almost ) all ThinkPads shortscreen , but my understanding is that they were essentially forced down that path by their suppliers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)Yes, absolutely.
Lenovo's biggest mistake is tarnishing the ThinkPad keyboard with a 'doze key.
The second biggest mistake is making (almost) all ThinkPads shortscreen, but my understanding is that they were essentially forced down that path by their suppliers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509591</id>
	<title>like my Apple keyboard?</title>
	<author>YesIAmAScript</author>
	<datestamp>1246208100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the current metal ones, but the plastic ones before. Huge escape key.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the current metal ones , but the plastic ones before .
Huge escape key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the current metal ones, but the plastic ones before.
Huge escape key.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513219</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>stu72</author>
	<datestamp>1246285920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can assure you that 99.9999\% of Windows users have no idea what Control or Alt are for, or that you can accomplish anything at all without a death grip on the mouse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can assure you that 99.9999 \ % of Windows users have no idea what Control or Alt are for , or that you can accomplish anything at all without a death grip on the mouse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can assure you that 99.9999\% of Windows users have no idea what Control or Alt are for, or that you can accomplish anything at all without a death grip on the mouse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509545</id>
	<title>I just wish.....</title>
	<author>chooks</author>
	<datestamp>1246207680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they would make the Any key bigger<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they would make the Any key bigger : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they would make the Any key bigger :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516287</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1246299960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your editor doesn't autodetect and automatically correct the caps (among other things) for you?</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your editor does n't autodetect and automatically correct the caps ( among other things ) for you ? -b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your editor doesn't autodetect and automatically correct the caps (among other things) for you?-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513549</id>
	<title>Engineering Drawings</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246288020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is standard practice to capitalize all text on engineering drawings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is standard practice to capitalize all text on engineering drawings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is standard practice to capitalize all text on engineering drawings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511025</id>
	<title>Re:Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>jamesswift</author>
	<datestamp>1246307820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's already dead on my mac.<br><a href="http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2181/mac\_os\_x\_disable\_caps\_lock\_key/" title="tech-recipes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2181/mac\_os\_x\_disable\_caps\_lock\_key/</a> [tech-recipes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's already dead on my mac.http : //www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2181/mac \ _os \ _x \ _disable \ _caps \ _lock \ _key/ [ tech-recipes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's already dead on my mac.http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2181/mac\_os\_x\_disable\_caps\_lock\_key/ [tech-recipes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510863</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1246306260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.</p></div><p>Give them Vista - it helpfully warns with "OMG WTF CAPS LOCK!!!" at login screen when it sees it on.</p><p>Then again, when the user cannot login, that's 1 problem. Once they can, be sure that there will be many more - so why call it upon yourself?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and , more importantly , reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.Give them Vista - it helpfully warns with " OMG WTF CAPS LOCK ! ! !
" at login screen when it sees it on.Then again , when the user can not login , that 's 1 problem .
Once they can , be sure that there will be many more - so why call it upon yourself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.Give them Vista - it helpfully warns with "OMG WTF CAPS LOCK!!!
" at login screen when it sees it on.Then again, when the user cannot login, that's 1 problem.
Once they can, be sure that there will be many more - so why call it upon yourself?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509993</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>mvdw</author>
	<datestamp>1246211820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I absolutely hate and detest keyboards with the home and end keys hidden like those ones - the EDA software I use uses home and end for navigation around the layout, so I am lost with them in any other place than the regular 'AT' layout.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I absolutely hate and detest keyboards with the home and end keys hidden like those ones - the EDA software I use uses home and end for navigation around the layout , so I am lost with them in any other place than the regular 'AT ' layout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I absolutely hate and detest keyboards with the home and end keys hidden like those ones - the EDA software I use uses home and end for navigation around the layout, so I am lost with them in any other place than the regular 'AT' layout.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509569</id>
	<title>mode lights</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246207980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever the keyboard is in a locking mode, or in insert mode, there should be an LED reminding the user of that.</p><p>Yeah, it costs a bit more, and I realize it may not be as easy as it sounds b/c of the keyboard driver, but that's one of the ways you get your product line out of the commodity end of the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever the keyboard is in a locking mode , or in insert mode , there should be an LED reminding the user of that.Yeah , it costs a bit more , and I realize it may not be as easy as it sounds b/c of the keyboard driver , but that 's one of the ways you get your product line out of the commodity end of the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever the keyboard is in a locking mode, or in insert mode, there should be an LED reminding the user of that.Yeah, it costs a bit more, and I realize it may not be as easy as it sounds b/c of the keyboard driver, but that's one of the ways you get your product line out of the commodity end of the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246215840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you insane? NumLock is autorun on most MMOs, you'd force people playing WoW to actually press and hold a button on the keyboard!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you insane ?
NumLock is autorun on most MMOs , you 'd force people playing WoW to actually press and hold a button on the keyboard !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you insane?
NumLock is autorun on most MMOs, you'd force people playing WoW to actually press and hold a button on the keyboard!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514165</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1246291020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just type lowercase SQL. The editor color-codes keywords anyway, and the interpreter hardly cares if you use caps or not. Plus I think lowercase is easier to read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just type lowercase SQL .
The editor color-codes keywords anyway , and the interpreter hardly cares if you use caps or not .
Plus I think lowercase is easier to read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just type lowercase SQL.
The editor color-codes keywords anyway, and the interpreter hardly cares if you use caps or not.
Plus I think lowercase is easier to read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514245</id>
	<title>Re:Still prefer regular sized keyboards</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1246291500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I can't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity.</i></p><p>Then you've never used a Lenovo/Thinkpad keyboard.  My typing rate (around 600 cpm/120 wpm) is identical on a my T61 as it is on a full-sized PC keyboard because a) the Lenovo layout absolutely rocks, b) the key action is perfect, and c) the frame beneath the keyboard is rock solid, so you don't get any unpleasant flexing.</p><p>TBH, when I was choosing a laptop as a desktop replacement, I ended up with a Lenore/Thinkpad primarily because of the superb keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity.Then you 've never used a Lenovo/Thinkpad keyboard .
My typing rate ( around 600 cpm/120 wpm ) is identical on a my T61 as it is on a full-sized PC keyboard because a ) the Lenovo layout absolutely rocks , b ) the key action is perfect , and c ) the frame beneath the keyboard is rock solid , so you do n't get any unpleasant flexing.TBH , when I was choosing a laptop as a desktop replacement , I ended up with a Lenore/Thinkpad primarily because of the superb keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity.Then you've never used a Lenovo/Thinkpad keyboard.
My typing rate (around 600 cpm/120 wpm) is identical on a my T61 as it is on a full-sized PC keyboard because a) the Lenovo layout absolutely rocks, b) the key action is perfect, and c) the frame beneath the keyboard is rock solid, so you don't get any unpleasant flexing.TBH, when I was choosing a laptop as a desktop replacement, I ended up with a Lenore/Thinkpad primarily because of the superb keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512213</id>
	<title>Unchanged since the 19th century??</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1246278120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p></div><p>Unchanged since the 19th century?? What a load of rubbish, keyboards are constantly being tinkered with, the trend seeming to be squeezing existing keys to make room for new keys.</p><p>What I'd like is a bigger return key, like when they used to be a big reverse L shape. Too many times I end a line like this#</p><p>because I've hit both keys at once</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Unchanged since the 19th century ? ?
What a load of rubbish , keyboards are constantly being tinkered with , the trend seeming to be squeezing existing keys to make room for new keys.What I 'd like is a bigger return key , like when they used to be a big reverse L shape .
Too many times I end a line like this # because I 've hit both keys at once</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Unchanged since the 19th century??
What a load of rubbish, keyboards are constantly being tinkered with, the trend seeming to be squeezing existing keys to make room for new keys.What I'd like is a bigger return key, like when they used to be a big reverse L shape.
Too many times I end a line like this#because I've hit both keys at once
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Prof.Phreak</author>
	<datestamp>1246306320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should swap Fn and Ctrl. I'm sure most linux/unix users would agree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should swap Fn and Ctrl .
I 'm sure most linux/unix users would agree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should swap Fn and Ctrl.
I'm sure most linux/unix users would agree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511111</id>
	<title>Escape key was in wrong place anyway</title>
	<author>ei4anb</author>
	<datestamp>1246309080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm typing this on a T400 and I'm glad to hear that they have fixed the escape key. On my kbd it's above the F1 key and I am tired of seeing the Firefox help page!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm typing this on a T400 and I 'm glad to hear that they have fixed the escape key .
On my kbd it 's above the F1 key and I am tired of seeing the Firefox help page !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm typing this on a T400 and I'm glad to hear that they have fixed the escape key.
On my kbd it's above the F1 key and I am tired of seeing the Firefox help page!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513045</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>ais523</author>
	<datestamp>1246284600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the two laptops I most commonly use, one has Fn on the left of Ctrl, the other has Fn on the right of Ctrl, which is really confusing. Which way round do you think they ought to be?</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the two laptops I most commonly use , one has Fn on the left of Ctrl , the other has Fn on the right of Ctrl , which is really confusing .
Which way round do you think they ought to be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the two laptops I most commonly use, one has Fn on the left of Ctrl, the other has Fn on the right of Ctrl, which is really confusing.
Which way round do you think they ought to be?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512927</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>zsau</author>
	<datestamp>1246283880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?</i></p><p>Indeed. I'm surprised an idiot article writer wrote that, more surprised that an idiot article submitter copied it, and completely unsurprised that an idiot Slashdot editor left it in. The keyboard has changed immensely since the 19th century. About the only things that haven't are the placement of the alphabetic keys and the offset alignment. And even those things have changed in non-US and specialist contexts often enough.</p><p>Aside from the presence of function and modifier keys, we have the massive change in semantics of capslock, shift, backspace and enter keys. We have the number pad. We have the insert etc. key block. We have the navigation keys. We have keyboards made out of radically different materials. A keyboard today would be recognisable to a 19th century typist or typewriter manufacturer, but they would still need to relearn how to use the thing and wouldn't follow you for five seconds when you described how they worked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century ? Indeed .
I 'm surprised an idiot article writer wrote that , more surprised that an idiot article submitter copied it , and completely unsurprised that an idiot Slashdot editor left it in .
The keyboard has changed immensely since the 19th century .
About the only things that have n't are the placement of the alphabetic keys and the offset alignment .
And even those things have changed in non-US and specialist contexts often enough.Aside from the presence of function and modifier keys , we have the massive change in semantics of capslock , shift , backspace and enter keys .
We have the number pad .
We have the insert etc .
key block .
We have the navigation keys .
We have keyboards made out of radically different materials .
A keyboard today would be recognisable to a 19th century typist or typewriter manufacturer , but they would still need to relearn how to use the thing and would n't follow you for five seconds when you described how they worked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?Indeed.
I'm surprised an idiot article writer wrote that, more surprised that an idiot article submitter copied it, and completely unsurprised that an idiot Slashdot editor left it in.
The keyboard has changed immensely since the 19th century.
About the only things that haven't are the placement of the alphabetic keys and the offset alignment.
And even those things have changed in non-US and specialist contexts often enough.Aside from the presence of function and modifier keys, we have the massive change in semantics of capslock, shift, backspace and enter keys.
We have the number pad.
We have the insert etc.
key block.
We have the navigation keys.
We have keyboards made out of radically different materials.
A keyboard today would be recognisable to a 19th century typist or typewriter manufacturer, but they would still need to relearn how to use the thing and wouldn't follow you for five seconds when you described how they worked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1246209300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign <i>everything</i> have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason: No delete key.</p><p>There's a backspace key labeled 'Delete,' which I cannot figure out the rationale of for the life of me.  My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled "delete" as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.</p><p>Although Apple's <i>always done it that way</i>, the rest of the world has adopted different terminology, and appreciates being able to delete text on both sides of the cursor.</p><p>Also irritating is that Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard, while their wired keyboards default to the godawful "compact" model.  This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good, are visually appealing, and take up a very small footprint on my desk.  Logitech's keyboards are hideous, enormous, don't use bluetooth, and very often actually cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign everything have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason : No delete key.There 's a backspace key labeled 'Delete, ' which I can not figure out the rationale of for the life of me .
My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled " delete " as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.Although Apple 's always done it that way , the rest of the world has adopted different terminology , and appreciates being able to delete text on both sides of the cursor.Also irritating is that Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard , while their wired keyboards default to the godawful " compact " model .
This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple 's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good , are visually appealing , and take up a very small footprint on my desk .
Logitech 's keyboards are hideous , enormous , do n't use bluetooth , and very often actually cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Apple who have a tendency to overthink and overdesign everything have some of the worst laptop keyboards for one very simple reason: No delete key.There's a backspace key labeled 'Delete,' which I cannot figure out the rationale of for the life of me.
My full-sized wireless keyboard also has a backspace key labeled "delete" as well as a real delete key labeled in the exact same manner.Although Apple's always done it that way, the rest of the world has adopted different terminology, and appreciates being able to delete text on both sides of the cursor.Also irritating is that Apple no longer even offer a full-sized wireless keyboard, while their wired keyboards default to the godawful "compact" model.
This is made slightly more bothersome by the fact that Apple's keyboards are otherwise actually quite good, are visually appealing, and take up a very small footprint on my desk.
Logitech's keyboards are hideous, enormous, don't use bluetooth, and very often actually cost more money than the equivalent model from Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512823</id>
	<title>IBM PS/2 clicky keyboard ftw!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246283280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm used to using an infowindow 5250 terminal connected to an AS/400 and my home computer's keyboard is the IBM clicky (without function keys up to 24)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm used to using an infowindow 5250 terminal connected to an AS/400 and my home computer 's keyboard is the IBM clicky ( without function keys up to 24 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm used to using an infowindow 5250 terminal connected to an AS/400 and my home computer's keyboard is the IBM clicky (without function keys up to 24)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510293</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>ryan\_fung</author>
	<datestamp>1246214580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they enlarge the S, I, N, E, P keys maybe I'll get half less spam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they enlarge the S , I , N , E , P keys maybe I 'll get half less spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they enlarge the S, I, N, E, P keys maybe I'll get half less spam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512753</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1246282800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly enough, some keyboard manufacturers have opted to eliminate not the useless NUM LOCK key, but the SCROLL LOCK key.</p><p>Thing is the Scroll Lock has uses.  Some old DOS applications (terminal apps, especially) used it to in place of the Pause key. BBS software commonly used it as a flag for whether or not the SysOp was available for chat (Scroll Lock on meant the SysOp was available for chat).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough , some keyboard manufacturers have opted to eliminate not the useless NUM LOCK key , but the SCROLL LOCK key.Thing is the Scroll Lock has uses .
Some old DOS applications ( terminal apps , especially ) used it to in place of the Pause key .
BBS software commonly used it as a flag for whether or not the SysOp was available for chat ( Scroll Lock on meant the SysOp was available for chat ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough, some keyboard manufacturers have opted to eliminate not the useless NUM LOCK key, but the SCROLL LOCK key.Thing is the Scroll Lock has uses.
Some old DOS applications (terminal apps, especially) used it to in place of the Pause key.
BBS software commonly used it as a flag for whether or not the SysOp was available for chat (Scroll Lock on meant the SysOp was available for chat).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510757</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.</p></div><p> <a href="http://bash.org/?835030" title="bash.org" rel="nofollow">IT IS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE THIS WAY</a> [bash.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and , more importantly , reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password .
IT IS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE THIS WAY [ bash.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.
IT IS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE THIS WAY [bash.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509733</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246209300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I didn't use it enough, but I always had trouble typing on one of those SUN keyboards with a few crucial keys in different places.  That, and certain case-sensitive programming languages or database data has legitimate use for long sequences of all-caps strings, often broken up by underscores.  I would miss the caps lock if it were totally gone, but I certainly wouldn't miss mistaking it for tab or lshift.  Can we move it to main function for Scroll Lock instead, and make Scroll Lock an alternate function?  I don't know what I'd want in its place, because for Windows typing, the common CTRL functions (X,S,V,C) are all easiest as LCTRL chords, and anchoring your left pinky to where Caps lock is to type these I think feels unnatural.  Never mind the loss of symmetry in the three-fingered salute!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I did n't use it enough , but I always had trouble typing on one of those SUN keyboards with a few crucial keys in different places .
That , and certain case-sensitive programming languages or database data has legitimate use for long sequences of all-caps strings , often broken up by underscores .
I would miss the caps lock if it were totally gone , but I certainly would n't miss mistaking it for tab or lshift .
Can we move it to main function for Scroll Lock instead , and make Scroll Lock an alternate function ?
I do n't know what I 'd want in its place , because for Windows typing , the common CTRL functions ( X,S,V,C ) are all easiest as LCTRL chords , and anchoring your left pinky to where Caps lock is to type these I think feels unnatural .
Never mind the loss of symmetry in the three-fingered salute !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I didn't use it enough, but I always had trouble typing on one of those SUN keyboards with a few crucial keys in different places.
That, and certain case-sensitive programming languages or database data has legitimate use for long sequences of all-caps strings, often broken up by underscores.
I would miss the caps lock if it were totally gone, but I certainly wouldn't miss mistaking it for tab or lshift.
Can we move it to main function for Scroll Lock instead, and make Scroll Lock an alternate function?
I don't know what I'd want in its place, because for Windows typing, the common CTRL functions (X,S,V,C) are all easiest as LCTRL chords, and anchoring your left pinky to where Caps lock is to type these I think feels unnatural.
Never mind the loss of symmetry in the three-fingered salute!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509679</id>
	<title>Unicomp killed the Capslock key...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.<br>
<br>
Unicomp bought and still run the original IBM keyboard factory in the US. They've been offering a variant with a demoted-CAPSLOCK key and a bigger control key in its place for Linux heads:
<a href="http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html" title="yahoo.net">http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html</a> [yahoo.net] <br>
<br>
This is the original buckling spring keyboard - the one with the glorious clickety-click sound as you type. They also offer the original keyboard (with the big CAPSLOCK key) too:
<a href="http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html" title="yahoo.net">http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html</a> [yahoo.net] <br>
<br>
I want to know just whose idea it was to put a CAPSLOCK key on the keyboard in the first place. I want to know the name and face of the IBM Engineer who did it. They can join MSDOS's Tim Paterson's '\' vs '/' in the Hall of Shame for the stupidest decisions with the most hurt in computing history.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda ; death is too good for Caps Lock .
Unicomp bought and still run the original IBM keyboard factory in the US .
They 've been offering a variant with a demoted-CAPSLOCK key and a bigger control key in its place for Linux heads : http : //pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html [ yahoo.net ] This is the original buckling spring keyboard - the one with the glorious clickety-click sound as you type .
They also offer the original keyboard ( with the big CAPSLOCK key ) too : http : //pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html [ yahoo.net ] I want to know just whose idea it was to put a CAPSLOCK key on the keyboard in the first place .
I want to know the name and face of the IBM Engineer who did it .
They can join MSDOS 's Tim Paterson 's ' \ ' vs '/ ' in the Hall of Shame for the stupidest decisions with the most hurt in computing history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.
Unicomp bought and still run the original IBM keyboard factory in the US.
They've been offering a variant with a demoted-CAPSLOCK key and a bigger control key in its place for Linux heads:
http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html [yahoo.net] 

This is the original buckling spring keyboard - the one with the glorious clickety-click sound as you type.
They also offer the original keyboard (with the big CAPSLOCK key) too:
http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html [yahoo.net] 

I want to know just whose idea it was to put a CAPSLOCK key on the keyboard in the first place.
I want to know the name and face of the IBM Engineer who did it.
They can join MSDOS's Tim Paterson's '\' vs '/' in the Hall of Shame for the stupidest decisions with the most hurt in computing history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509945</id>
	<title>how about...</title>
	<author>gsgleason</author>
	<datestamp>1246211340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about putting the escape key in a normal place, like left of F1, not above it?  My thinkpad and most of the others I've seen are as such.  Or are you saying I shouldn't use vim?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about putting the escape key in a normal place , like left of F1 , not above it ?
My thinkpad and most of the others I 've seen are as such .
Or are you saying I should n't use vim ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about putting the escape key in a normal place, like left of F1, not above it?
My thinkpad and most of the others I've seen are as such.
Or are you saying I shouldn't use vim?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517739</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1246305420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I touch type, and have no problems hitting 70-80 words per minute.  I often hold the shift key down instead of using the caps lock, also.  It takes a slightly different technique, but I do touch-type ALL CAPS without the CAPS LOCK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I touch type , and have no problems hitting 70-80 words per minute .
I often hold the shift key down instead of using the caps lock , also .
It takes a slightly different technique , but I do touch-type ALL CAPS without the CAPS LOCK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I touch type, and have no problems hitting 70-80 words per minute.
I often hold the shift key down instead of using the caps lock, also.
It takes a slightly different technique, but I do touch-type ALL CAPS without the CAPS LOCK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524047</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>alcourt</author>
	<datestamp>1246294860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my keyboard, the key that triggers the "Windows key" function and the Mac "command" function appears to actually send a meta keystroke.  Remember, Escape, Meta, Alt, Control, Shift are your friends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my keyboard , the key that triggers the " Windows key " function and the Mac " command " function appears to actually send a meta keystroke .
Remember , Escape , Meta , Alt , Control , Shift are your friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my keyboard, the key that triggers the "Windows key" function and the Mac "command" function appears to actually send a meta keystroke.
Remember, Escape, Meta, Alt, Control, Shift are your friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510983</id>
	<title>Vim users may rejoice</title>
	<author>firefarter</author>
	<datestamp>1246307460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using vim on a Mac keyboard is a pain exactly because the ESC-key is so small.<br>I'd say that in vim the single most used key is ESC!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using vim on a Mac keyboard is a pain exactly because the ESC-key is so small.I 'd say that in vim the single most used key is ESC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using vim on a Mac keyboard is a pain exactly because the ESC-key is so small.I'd say that in vim the single most used key is ESC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514979</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246294860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All-caps is not more readable to humans.  It's only better for OCR.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All-caps is not more readable to humans .
It 's only better for OCR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All-caps is not more readable to humans.
It's only better for OCR.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28525049</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246392000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they really need to enlarge the U key twice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they really need to enlarge the U key twice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they really need to enlarge the U key twice?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509411</id>
	<title>Still prefer regular sized keyboards</title>
	<author>Henry Pate</author>
	<datestamp>1246206660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity.  I only have to use a laptop for work from time to time and whenever I do I always plug in a regular sized keyboard if one is available.<br> <br>

The laptop keys don't have the same feel, some are in strange places, no regular number pad. Less lack of division between the keys, regular keyboards have that nice gap between the tops of the keys.<br>
Making the Esc and Del keys bigger is a good idea in my view but it still isn't going to get me to use a laptop keyboard unless I'm forced to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity .
I only have to use a laptop for work from time to time and whenever I do I always plug in a regular sized keyboard if one is available .
The laptop keys do n't have the same feel , some are in strange places , no regular number pad .
Less lack of division between the keys , regular keyboards have that nice gap between the tops of the keys .
Making the Esc and Del keys bigger is a good idea in my view but it still is n't going to get me to use a laptop keyboard unless I 'm forced to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't use a laptop keyboard to near my regular level of productivity.
I only have to use a laptop for work from time to time and whenever I do I always plug in a regular sized keyboard if one is available.
The laptop keys don't have the same feel, some are in strange places, no regular number pad.
Less lack of division between the keys, regular keyboards have that nice gap between the tops of the keys.
Making the Esc and Del keys bigger is a good idea in my view but it still isn't going to get me to use a laptop keyboard unless I'm forced to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510617</id>
	<title>Back and forward keys next to arrow keys</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1246217280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Lenovo was going to fix \_one thing\_ I wish they would move the placement of the forward and backward navigation keys from near the arrow keys.  My Thinkpad x61 has the keys to navigate forward and backward in a browser right next to the arrow keys, so when I'm typing up a form (for example<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.) and I want to move from one portion of my text to the other, I'll press the arrow keys.  Only problem is that every once in a while, I'll miss and instead of hitting a back arrow, I'll hit the backward navigation key.  My browser will go back, and my form will be wiped - drives me nuts!  <br> <br>
I can't be the only person this has happened to...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Lenovo was going to fix \ _one thing \ _ I wish they would move the placement of the forward and backward navigation keys from near the arrow keys .
My Thinkpad x61 has the keys to navigate forward and backward in a browser right next to the arrow keys , so when I 'm typing up a form ( for example / .
) and I want to move from one portion of my text to the other , I 'll press the arrow keys .
Only problem is that every once in a while , I 'll miss and instead of hitting a back arrow , I 'll hit the backward navigation key .
My browser will go back , and my form will be wiped - drives me nuts !
I ca n't be the only person this has happened to.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Lenovo was going to fix \_one thing\_ I wish they would move the placement of the forward and backward navigation keys from near the arrow keys.
My Thinkpad x61 has the keys to navigate forward and backward in a browser right next to the arrow keys, so when I'm typing up a form (for example /.
) and I want to move from one portion of my text to the other, I'll press the arrow keys.
Only problem is that every once in a while, I'll miss and instead of hitting a back arrow, I'll hit the backward navigation key.
My browser will go back, and my form will be wiped - drives me nuts!
I can't be the only person this has happened to...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509493</id>
	<title>19th century?</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1246207260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not aware of many <b>keyboards</b> from the 19th century.  Sure, the QWERTY layout came about at the end of the 19th century, but was used on typewriters as best I know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not aware of many keyboards from the 19th century .
Sure , the QWERTY layout came about at the end of the 19th century , but was used on typewriters as best I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not aware of many keyboards from the 19th century.
Sure, the QWERTY layout came about at the end of the 19th century, but was used on typewriters as best I know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511477</id>
	<title>Anti-Caps Lock perverts</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1246270800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Caps Lock is the most useful key on the keyboard. Any subvert who wants me to hold down shift while I type a long CAPITALISED\_IDENTIFIER is going to have to prize Caps Lock from under my cold dead little finger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Caps Lock is the most useful key on the keyboard .
Any subvert who wants me to hold down shift while I type a long CAPITALISED \ _IDENTIFIER is going to have to prize Caps Lock from under my cold dead little finger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caps Lock is the most useful key on the keyboard.
Any subvert who wants me to hold down shift while I type a long CAPITALISED\_IDENTIFIER is going to have to prize Caps Lock from under my cold dead little finger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517987</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1246306440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can never find the home or end keys!</p></div><p>I discovered the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/CatImg/ProdImg/1/22/9a3df2fa-9966-4e55-b28d-cc6e156ccf1a\_large.jpg" title="microsoft.com">Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard</a> [microsoft.com] (that has since been generally discontinued, of course) which did shuffle around Home/End/Delete/P.up/P.down, etc., but did so in an entirely logical manner... at least for Windows usage.  I wouldn't use it for editing in UNIX, but it matches the function of Windows text editors quite well.  [It also compresses the horizontal width of the keyboard, moving in the numpad and arrow keys, thus making all key accesses somewhat easier for small hands.]<br> <br>Instead of being a 3 column x 2 row 6 button layout, it is a 2 column x 3 row layout with an oversize Delete button (Insert got kicked off, which is fine by me given how rarely I actually use it).  First off, this puts all the buttons in better reach of my small hands, and significantly increases the ease of hitting "Delete".  (No, I haven't had a problem with accidental deletes, either).  <br> <br>Also, Home and End sit horizontally adjacent which is much more intuitive than the usual vertical layout given their far left/far right operation in Windows text editors.  Page Up and Page Down remain vertically adjacent in the right column of the rectangle, as befits their operation.<br> <br>All in all, I've found it to be a wonderfully comfortable keyboard, especially as it is missing the extra keys that often appear around the cursor arrows.  They made the annoying move of giving the function keys odd shortcut abilities, but a single keypress (that is remembered by the keyboard, so it persists even during computer power-off) restores their normal functions.  The "bonus" buttons along the top edge are completely customizable (I have them linked to things like Firefox, Gmail, iTunes, etc.) and more than make up for the function-key oddness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can never find the home or end keys ! I discovered the Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard [ microsoft.com ] ( that has since been generally discontinued , of course ) which did shuffle around Home/End/Delete/P.up/P.down , etc. , but did so in an entirely logical manner... at least for Windows usage .
I would n't use it for editing in UNIX , but it matches the function of Windows text editors quite well .
[ It also compresses the horizontal width of the keyboard , moving in the numpad and arrow keys , thus making all key accesses somewhat easier for small hands .
] Instead of being a 3 column x 2 row 6 button layout , it is a 2 column x 3 row layout with an oversize Delete button ( Insert got kicked off , which is fine by me given how rarely I actually use it ) .
First off , this puts all the buttons in better reach of my small hands , and significantly increases the ease of hitting " Delete " .
( No , I have n't had a problem with accidental deletes , either ) .
Also , Home and End sit horizontally adjacent which is much more intuitive than the usual vertical layout given their far left/far right operation in Windows text editors .
Page Up and Page Down remain vertically adjacent in the right column of the rectangle , as befits their operation .
All in all , I 've found it to be a wonderfully comfortable keyboard , especially as it is missing the extra keys that often appear around the cursor arrows .
They made the annoying move of giving the function keys odd shortcut abilities , but a single keypress ( that is remembered by the keyboard , so it persists even during computer power-off ) restores their normal functions .
The " bonus " buttons along the top edge are completely customizable ( I have them linked to things like Firefox , Gmail , iTunes , etc .
) and more than make up for the function-key oddness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can never find the home or end keys!I discovered the Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard [microsoft.com] (that has since been generally discontinued, of course) which did shuffle around Home/End/Delete/P.up/P.down, etc., but did so in an entirely logical manner... at least for Windows usage.
I wouldn't use it for editing in UNIX, but it matches the function of Windows text editors quite well.
[It also compresses the horizontal width of the keyboard, moving in the numpad and arrow keys, thus making all key accesses somewhat easier for small hands.
] Instead of being a 3 column x 2 row 6 button layout, it is a 2 column x 3 row layout with an oversize Delete button (Insert got kicked off, which is fine by me given how rarely I actually use it).
First off, this puts all the buttons in better reach of my small hands, and significantly increases the ease of hitting "Delete".
(No, I haven't had a problem with accidental deletes, either).
Also, Home and End sit horizontally adjacent which is much more intuitive than the usual vertical layout given their far left/far right operation in Windows text editors.
Page Up and Page Down remain vertically adjacent in the right column of the rectangle, as befits their operation.
All in all, I've found it to be a wonderfully comfortable keyboard, especially as it is missing the extra keys that often appear around the cursor arrows.
They made the annoying move of giving the function keys odd shortcut abilities, but a single keypress (that is remembered by the keyboard, so it persists even during computer power-off) restores their normal functions.
The "bonus" buttons along the top edge are completely customizable (I have them linked to things like Firefox, Gmail, iTunes, etc.
) and more than make up for the function-key oddness.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510685</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Werrismys</author>
	<datestamp>1246217880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because it's NATURAL to have CTRL there. Jesus used CTRL that was left from A.<br>
It hurts to hunt CTRL from the fucking corner. Better have both. Capslock is useless, either kill the fucker or hide it behinf FN-this or that.<br>
I have capslock mapped as CTRL on my ubuntu boxes and on my mac - matter of clicketi-click via preferences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's NATURAL to have CTRL there .
Jesus used CTRL that was left from A . It hurts to hunt CTRL from the fucking corner .
Better have both .
Capslock is useless , either kill the fucker or hide it behinf FN-this or that .
I have capslock mapped as CTRL on my ubuntu boxes and on my mac - matter of clicketi-click via preferences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's NATURAL to have CTRL there.
Jesus used CTRL that was left from A.
It hurts to hunt CTRL from the fucking corner.
Better have both.
Capslock is useless, either kill the fucker or hide it behinf FN-this or that.
I have capslock mapped as CTRL on my ubuntu boxes and on my mac - matter of clicketi-click via preferences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512957</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>need4mospd</author>
	<datestamp>1246284060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old and braindead sounds about right. Most senior level architects insist in noting all drawings in CAPS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old and braindead sounds about right .
Most senior level architects insist in noting all drawings in CAPS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old and braindead sounds about right.
Most senior level architects insist in noting all drawings in CAPS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509583</id>
	<title>...largely unchanged since the 19th century?</title>
	<author>PNutts</author>
	<datestamp>1246208040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahem. We still have 26 alpha and 10 numeric but about everything else has changed. Frequently. More like "largely unchanged since the 19th of June".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem .
We still have 26 alpha and 10 numeric but about everything else has changed .
Frequently. More like " largely unchanged since the 19th of June " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem.
We still have 26 alpha and 10 numeric but about everything else has changed.
Frequently. More like "largely unchanged since the 19th of June".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512073</id>
	<title>Key swaps...</title>
	<author>Twinbee</author>
	<datestamp>1246276800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's a better idea - make the = and + key reverse, so that shift produces =, and pressing it normally makes +. This way it would be like the minus key.<br> <br>

Here's another idea. Have the parenthesis keys replace the less often used square brackets (and swap them, so that shift+9 is [ instead. Either that, or add more keys for the parenthesis symbols instead of using shift to get them.<br> <br>

Finally, even better than the above ideas, let's all have a keyboard where you can define what they keys are, like the new <a href="http://www.skytopia.com/oled/" title="skytopia.com">Optimus OLED keyboard</a> [skytopia.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a better idea - make the = and + key reverse , so that shift produces = , and pressing it normally makes + .
This way it would be like the minus key .
Here 's another idea .
Have the parenthesis keys replace the less often used square brackets ( and swap them , so that shift + 9 is [ instead .
Either that , or add more keys for the parenthesis symbols instead of using shift to get them .
Finally , even better than the above ideas , let 's all have a keyboard where you can define what they keys are , like the new Optimus OLED keyboard [ skytopia.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a better idea - make the = and + key reverse, so that shift produces =, and pressing it normally makes +.
This way it would be like the minus key.
Here's another idea.
Have the parenthesis keys replace the less often used square brackets (and swap them, so that shift+9 is [ instead.
Either that, or add more keys for the parenthesis symbols instead of using shift to get them.
Finally, even better than the above ideas, let's all have a keyboard where you can define what they keys are, like the new Optimus OLED keyboard [skytopia.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511811</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>wild\_berry</author>
	<datestamp>1246273920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>[P]erhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?</p></div></blockquote><p>Given that I use the keyboad asymmetrically anyway (my right hand is on my mouse), I don't see the problem.  Perhaps alignment and symmetry are far more important to you than to me?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ P ] erhaps you 'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout ? Given that I use the keyboad asymmetrically anyway ( my right hand is on my mouse ) , I do n't see the problem .
Perhaps alignment and symmetry are far more important to you than to me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[P]erhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?Given that I use the keyboad asymmetrically anyway (my right hand is on my mouse), I don't see the problem.
Perhaps alignment and symmetry are far more important to you than to me?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512003</id>
	<title>And make intended shouting much harder!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246275960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Caps lock will be the end of unintended shouting</p></div><p>I would like you to meet my friend, Khassaki:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>&lt;Khassaki&gt; HI EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!<br>&lt;Judge-Mental&gt; try pressing the the Caps Lock key<br>&lt;Khassaki&gt; O THANKS!!! ITS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE NOW!!!!!!!<br>&lt;Judge-Mental&gt; fuck me</p></div><p>(From <a href="http://www.bash.org/?835030" title="bash.org">http://www.bash.org/?835030</a> [bash.org])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutingI would like you to meet my friend , Khassaki : HI EVERYBODY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
try pressing the the Caps Lock key O THANKS ! ! !
ITS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE NOW ! ! ! ! ! ! !
fuck me ( From http : //www.bash.org/ ? 835030 [ bash.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutingI would like you to meet my friend, Khassaki: HI EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!
try pressing the the Caps Lock key O THANKS!!!
ITS SO MUCH EASIER TO WRITE NOW!!!!!!!
fuck me(From http://www.bash.org/?835030 [bash.org])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510831</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Baloo Uriza</author>
	<datestamp>1246305840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>assuming that the numeric keypad will always be over cursor control keys needs to die:  compact keyboard layouts like the Happy Hacker and every laptop ever made puts the numeric keypad over the alphanumeric keyboard, and Ghod help you if you have NumLock on by default!</htmltext>
<tokenext>assuming that the numeric keypad will always be over cursor control keys needs to die : compact keyboard layouts like the Happy Hacker and every laptop ever made puts the numeric keypad over the alphanumeric keyboard , and Ghod help you if you have NumLock on by default !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>assuming that the numeric keypad will always be over cursor control keys needs to die:  compact keyboard layouts like the Happy Hacker and every laptop ever made puts the numeric keypad over the alphanumeric keyboard, and Ghod help you if you have NumLock on by default!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514213</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>boxxertrumps</author>
	<datestamp>1246291320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Always changed autorun to the * key, so i didn't have to worry about the state of my keypad.</p><p>That was before I got bored of WoW, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Always changed autorun to the * key , so i did n't have to worry about the state of my keypad.That was before I got bored of WoW , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Always changed autorun to the * key, so i didn't have to worry about the state of my keypad.That was before I got bored of WoW, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513027</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>SCHecklerX</author>
	<datestamp>1246284480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, but to use compiz with any degree of efficiency, you unfortunately need the super key<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , but to use compiz with any degree of efficiency , you unfortunately need the super key : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, but to use compiz with any degree of efficiency, you unfortunately need the super key :-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511587</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>bliip</author>
	<datestamp>1246271760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div><p>Let me guess...you're talking about the special edition 'youtube comment' keyboard?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a better idea Lenovo : enlarge the : U , O , Y , K , C , U , F keys .
; ) Let me guess...you 're talking about the special edition 'youtube comment ' keyboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.
;)Let me guess...you're talking about the special edition 'youtube comment' keyboard?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514415</id>
	<title>Largely unchanged?</title>
	<author>cthrall</author>
	<datestamp>1246292340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p></div></blockquote><p>Every keyboard I've ever used has been different. I wish there was a spec, and it was tied to a circa 1997 Microsoft Natural keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Every keyboard I 've ever used has been different .
I wish there was a spec , and it was tied to a circa 1997 Microsoft Natural keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Every keyboard I've ever used has been different.
I wish there was a spec, and it was tied to a circa 1997 Microsoft Natural keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</id>
	<title>Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.</i>
<br>

If Lenovo is going to do it - Caps Lock will die a death and no one will notice. It is better for the industry to let Apple do what it does best and let the Caps lock die at Apple's hand. They will sell a iCapsLock add-on for $30 to stir up things even further and the caps lock death will then be rightly celebrated by the loads of forum posts and bickering by people newly realizing how much they miss the Caps lock now that it is gone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda ; death is too good for Caps Lock .
If Lenovo is going to do it - Caps Lock will die a death and no one will notice .
It is better for the industry to let Apple do what it does best and let the Caps lock die at Apple 's hand .
They will sell a iCapsLock add-on for $ 30 to stir up things even further and the caps lock death will then be rightly celebrated by the loads of forum posts and bickering by people newly realizing how much they miss the Caps lock now that it is gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says Caps Lock may be next on the agenda; death is too good for Caps Lock.
If Lenovo is going to do it - Caps Lock will die a death and no one will notice.
It is better for the industry to let Apple do what it does best and let the Caps lock die at Apple's hand.
They will sell a iCapsLock add-on for $30 to stir up things even further and the caps lock death will then be rightly celebrated by the loads of forum posts and bickering by people newly realizing how much they miss the Caps lock now that it is gone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509985</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Swanktastic</author>
	<datestamp>1246211760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  I'm boycotting Apple until they bring back the closed Apple key.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I 'm boycotting Apple until they bring back the closed Apple key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I'm boycotting Apple until they bring back the closed Apple key.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510375</id>
	<title>Re:VI and ESC</title>
	<author>RyuuzakiTetsuya</author>
	<datestamp>1246215360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some cheap keyboard maker should fuck with Emacs users and matrix ctrl alt and escape together so they don't work when any two are pressed in tandem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some cheap keyboard maker should fuck with Emacs users and matrix ctrl alt and escape together so they do n't work when any two are pressed in tandem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some cheap keyboard maker should fuck with Emacs users and matrix ctrl alt and escape together so they don't work when any two are pressed in tandem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512909</id>
	<title>NumLock on MMO</title>
	<author>krischik</author>
	<datestamp>1246283820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Mac has no NumLock - and guess what: I can still autorun in WoW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Mac has no NumLock - and guess what : I can still autorun in WoW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Mac has no NumLock - and guess what: I can still autorun in WoW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510113</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>walshy007</author>
	<datestamp>1246213020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use insert, delete home and end frequently, scroll lock not so much, and pause/break very rarely, but they still have use.</p><p>Function keys are excellent for switching between terminals when not using X, etc.</p><p> but caps lock and left ctrl should be switched though, imho.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use insert , delete home and end frequently , scroll lock not so much , and pause/break very rarely , but they still have use.Function keys are excellent for switching between terminals when not using X , etc .
but caps lock and left ctrl should be switched though , imho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use insert, delete home and end frequently, scroll lock not so much, and pause/break very rarely, but they still have use.Function keys are excellent for switching between terminals when not using X, etc.
but caps lock and left ctrl should be switched though, imho.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512197</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>negge</author>
	<datestamp>1246277820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, after a while with a Logitech keyboard (I suppose you mean the $10 model) you get so used to the re-arrangement of the home/end/insert keys that you get really frustrated whenever you have to use a standard keyboard again. It's all just a matter of preference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , after a while with a Logitech keyboard ( I suppose you mean the $ 10 model ) you get so used to the re-arrangement of the home/end/insert keys that you get really frustrated whenever you have to use a standard keyboard again .
It 's all just a matter of preference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, after a while with a Logitech keyboard (I suppose you mean the $10 model) you get so used to the re-arrangement of the home/end/insert keys that you get really frustrated whenever you have to use a standard keyboard again.
It's all just a matter of preference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511507</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1246270980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Amiga also had its command keys in the same position. I presume some analysis was done to find the best place for a command key, and both companies decided on this location as a result. It was Windows that did things differently, when they (ten years later) introduced the Windows key, forever banishing Ctrl to the far corners of the main keyboard area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Amiga also had its command keys in the same position .
I presume some analysis was done to find the best place for a command key , and both companies decided on this location as a result .
It was Windows that did things differently , when they ( ten years later ) introduced the Windows key , forever banishing Ctrl to the far corners of the main keyboard area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Amiga also had its command keys in the same position.
I presume some analysis was done to find the best place for a command key, and both companies decided on this location as a result.
It was Windows that did things differently, when they (ten years later) introduced the Windows key, forever banishing Ctrl to the far corners of the main keyboard area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510955</id>
	<title>Since the 19th Century?!?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246307160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm amazed that no one has commented on the assertion in the story that the Escape and Delete keys have been in use since the "19th" century.  I'm pretty sure that they weren't in use until the later half of the "20th" century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amazed that no one has commented on the assertion in the story that the Escape and Delete keys have been in use since the " 19th " century .
I 'm pretty sure that they were n't in use until the later half of the " 20th " century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amazed that no one has commented on the assertion in the story that the Escape and Delete keys have been in use since the "19th" century.
I'm pretty sure that they weren't in use until the later half of the "20th" century.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509623</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1246208340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Of course they did! How else do you think they were able to write the stories about how Ford started mass-producing flying horseless carriages or the first Montgolfier balloon to actually circumnavigate the moon. My great-great-grandparents watched it as it happened on their coal-powered TeleStereopticon. If you don't believe it, you can always search for the story on the aethernet with your Difference Engine. Just goolgol for it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century ?
Of course they did !
How else do you think they were able to write the stories about how Ford started mass-producing flying horseless carriages or the first Montgolfier balloon to actually circumnavigate the moon .
My great-great-grandparents watched it as it happened on their coal-powered TeleStereopticon .
If you do n't believe it , you can always search for the story on the aethernet with your Difference Engine .
Just goolgol for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?
Of course they did!
How else do you think they were able to write the stories about how Ford started mass-producing flying horseless carriages or the first Montgolfier balloon to actually circumnavigate the moon.
My great-great-grandparents watched it as it happened on their coal-powered TeleStereopticon.
If you don't believe it, you can always search for the story on the aethernet with your Difference Engine.
Just goolgol for it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510477</id>
	<title>Since the 19th century?</title>
	<author>Builder</author>
	<datestamp>1246216380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I'm just confused here, but what keyboards did we have in the 19th century that had backspace keys? Or does some idiot not know that the 1900's were the 20th century ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm just confused here , but what keyboards did we have in the 19th century that had backspace keys ?
Or does some idiot not know that the 1900 's were the 20th century ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm just confused here, but what keyboards did we have in the 19th century that had backspace keys?
Or does some idiot not know that the 1900's were the 20th century ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510451</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>aus\_jackd</author>
	<datestamp>1246216140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Programming applications of the Caps Lock key aside, I think this move would stumble in the Asian market. I used to live in China, am married to a Chinese woman and deal everyday with people in HK, Taiwan and China. <br> <br>

My experience with everyone I met in these places is that they universally do not use the Shift key to capitalise. They will switch on Caps Lock - even for one letter in a sentence. My colleagues, friends and relatives in China all do this. <br> <br>

For example I will sit and watch my wife type. She will quickly tap the Caps Lock key, tap one single letter and then quickly tap Caps Lock again to turn it off. It does not break her typing flow at all, but it frustrates me because it feels inefficient. She has found a way that works for her and feels no need to change. It annoys her if I even mention it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br> <br>

So there will be some resistance from the many Chinese people who prefer Caps Lock to Shift.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Programming applications of the Caps Lock key aside , I think this move would stumble in the Asian market .
I used to live in China , am married to a Chinese woman and deal everyday with people in HK , Taiwan and China .
My experience with everyone I met in these places is that they universally do not use the Shift key to capitalise .
They will switch on Caps Lock - even for one letter in a sentence .
My colleagues , friends and relatives in China all do this .
For example I will sit and watch my wife type .
She will quickly tap the Caps Lock key , tap one single letter and then quickly tap Caps Lock again to turn it off .
It does not break her typing flow at all , but it frustrates me because it feels inefficient .
She has found a way that works for her and feels no need to change .
It annoys her if I even mention it : ) So there will be some resistance from the many Chinese people who prefer Caps Lock to Shift .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Programming applications of the Caps Lock key aside, I think this move would stumble in the Asian market.
I used to live in China, am married to a Chinese woman and deal everyday with people in HK, Taiwan and China.
My experience with everyone I met in these places is that they universally do not use the Shift key to capitalise.
They will switch on Caps Lock - even for one letter in a sentence.
My colleagues, friends and relatives in China all do this.
For example I will sit and watch my wife type.
She will quickly tap the Caps Lock key, tap one single letter and then quickly tap Caps Lock again to turn it off.
It does not break her typing flow at all, but it frustrates me because it feels inefficient.
She has found a way that works for her and feels no need to change.
It annoys her if I even mention it :) 

So there will be some resistance from the many Chinese people who prefer Caps Lock to Shift.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509389</id>
	<title>what delete key</title>
	<author>jjbaulikki</author>
	<datestamp>1246206480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>delete key?  where is that on my keyboard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>delete key ?
where is that on my keyboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>delete key?
where is that on my keyboard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647</id>
	<title>Boffins?</title>
	<author>IceFoot</author>
	<datestamp>1246208460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lenovo has boffins?  What the heck are they, creatures from Lord of the Rings?  Some kind of exotic bird?  Wait, the dictionary says it's BRITISH SLANG.  Well, you can just keep your esoteric BRITISH SLANG over there on your little island, buster, because we don't need no stinking BRITISH SLANG over here in America, or the rest of the world for that matter.  If you can't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it, just press your DELETE key (no matter what size it is) and go do something else.  *grumble* damned Recoats *grumble*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo has boffins ?
What the heck are they , creatures from Lord of the Rings ?
Some kind of exotic bird ?
Wait , the dictionary says it 's BRITISH SLANG .
Well , you can just keep your esoteric BRITISH SLANG over there on your little island , buster , because we do n't need no stinking BRITISH SLANG over here in America , or the rest of the world for that matter .
If you ca n't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it , just press your DELETE key ( no matter what size it is ) and go do something else .
* grumble * damned Recoats * grumble *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo has boffins?
What the heck are they, creatures from Lord of the Rings?
Some kind of exotic bird?
Wait, the dictionary says it's BRITISH SLANG.
Well, you can just keep your esoteric BRITISH SLANG over there on your little island, buster, because we don't need no stinking BRITISH SLANG over here in America, or the rest of the world for that matter.
If you can't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it, just press your DELETE key (no matter what size it is) and go do something else.
*grumble* damned Recoats *grumble*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511517</id>
	<title>Re:HERE'S AN IDEA</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1246271100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet?</p></div></blockquote><p>Because people tend not to get on with werewolves?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet ? Because people tend not to get on with werewolves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet?Because people tend not to get on with werewolves?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509315</id>
	<title>serious improvements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should think of something to make mistyping harder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should think of something to make mistyping harder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should think of something to make mistyping harder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301</id>
	<title>No need</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1246205640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pfft.  Deletee kye? I never usses taht aneemore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pfft .
Deletee kye ?
I never usses taht aneemore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pfft.
Deletee kye?
I never usses taht aneemore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516151</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1246299420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought about your comment for a few seconds before I decided that I'd prefer to accidentally shout half a word and need to use backspace or ctrl-h rather than accidentally send a control sequence and cause harm or at the very least wind up retyping a command (depending on the shell).</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought about your comment for a few seconds before I decided that I 'd prefer to accidentally shout half a word and need to use backspace or ctrl-h rather than accidentally send a control sequence and cause harm or at the very least wind up retyping a command ( depending on the shell ) .-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought about your comment for a few seconds before I decided that I'd prefer to accidentally shout half a word and need to use backspace or ctrl-h rather than accidentally send a control sequence and cause harm or at the very least wind up retyping a command (depending on the shell).-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510147</id>
	<title>Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246213380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Especially in the case of the Esc key, the size doesn't really matter.  My fingers know that Esc is the upper-leftmost button.  If my finger feels another button further left or further up, I know there's a problem.  The Esc key could be half the size, and it wouldn't make a bit of a difference.
<br> <br>
I can understand changing the Delete key though, because it's so close to the enormous Enter key*.  Anytime you're trying to press "delete," "enter" is probably the last key in the world that you want to press.  I can't count how many times I've been talking to somebody on AIM/MSN, typed something I didn't actually want to say, then accidentally pressed "return" instead of "delete"
<br> <br>
*I use a Mac</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially in the case of the Esc key , the size does n't really matter .
My fingers know that Esc is the upper-leftmost button .
If my finger feels another button further left or further up , I know there 's a problem .
The Esc key could be half the size , and it would n't make a bit of a difference .
I can understand changing the Delete key though , because it 's so close to the enormous Enter key * .
Anytime you 're trying to press " delete , " " enter " is probably the last key in the world that you want to press .
I ca n't count how many times I 've been talking to somebody on AIM/MSN , typed something I did n't actually want to say , then accidentally pressed " return " instead of " delete " * I use a Mac</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially in the case of the Esc key, the size doesn't really matter.
My fingers know that Esc is the upper-leftmost button.
If my finger feels another button further left or further up, I know there's a problem.
The Esc key could be half the size, and it wouldn't make a bit of a difference.
I can understand changing the Delete key though, because it's so close to the enormous Enter key*.
Anytime you're trying to press "delete," "enter" is probably the last key in the world that you want to press.
I can't count how many times I've been talking to somebody on AIM/MSN, typed something I didn't actually want to say, then accidentally pressed "return" instead of "delete"
 
*I use a Mac</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510829</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>El\_Muerte\_TDS</author>
	<datestamp>1246305840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anything, they should change the caps lock to a compose key. That way you can recycle the led to indicate the compose is on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anything , they should change the caps lock to a compose key .
That way you can recycle the led to indicate the compose is on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anything, they should change the caps lock to a compose key.
That way you can recycle the led to indicate the compose is on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510031</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1246212120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Or perhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?</i></p><p>As someone who maps caps to ctrl, yes. What's so wrong about it being asymmetrical? I at least had absolutely no difficulty with adjusting to that ctrl location -- the only problems was adjusting BACK when I used a computer without that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or perhaps you 'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout ? As someone who maps caps to ctrl , yes .
What 's so wrong about it being asymmetrical ?
I at least had absolutely no difficulty with adjusting to that ctrl location -- the only problems was adjusting BACK when I used a computer without that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or perhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?As someone who maps caps to ctrl, yes.
What's so wrong about it being asymmetrical?
I at least had absolutely no difficulty with adjusting to that ctrl location -- the only problems was adjusting BACK when I used a computer without that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339</id>
	<title>Nineteenth Century</title>
	<author>Speare</author>
	<datestamp>1246206000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys, idiot.  Hell, when I learned to type, you had to use a lowercase L for the digit 1, and a capital O for the digit zero.  Exclamation point was "apostrophe, backspace, period."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys , idiot .
Hell , when I learned to type , you had to use a lowercase L for the digit 1 , and a capital O for the digit zero .
Exclamation point was " apostrophe , backspace , period .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys, idiot.
Hell, when I learned to type, you had to use a lowercase L for the digit 1, and a capital O for the digit zero.
Exclamation point was "apostrophe, backspace, period.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509463</id>
	<title>Goldtouch Keyboard</title>
	<author>chroma</author>
	<datestamp>1246207080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a couple Goldtouch keyboards that have a great improvement: extra Delete and Backspace keys on the left hand side of the keyboard. It's very helpful when you've got your right hand on the mouse.</p><p>Also, Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space. Both of these are great improvements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a couple Goldtouch keyboards that have a great improvement : extra Delete and Backspace keys on the left hand side of the keyboard .
It 's very helpful when you 've got your right hand on the mouse.Also , Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space .
Both of these are great improvements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a couple Goldtouch keyboards that have a great improvement: extra Delete and Backspace keys on the left hand side of the keyboard.
It's very helpful when you've got your right hand on the mouse.Also, Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space.
Both of these are great improvements.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517563</id>
	<title>Finally Leveno is hacker-friendly</title>
	<author>microbee</author>
	<datestamp>1246304640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Delete and Escape, sounds like what a hacker would do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Delete and Escape , sounds like what a hacker would do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Delete and Escape, sounds like what a hacker would do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509541</id>
	<title>Half right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246207620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget the bigger delete key, I don't make mistakes.</p><p>Bigger escape key, sure.  Help counter other people's mistakes.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget the bigger delete key , I do n't make mistakes.Bigger escape key , sure .
Help counter other people 's mistakes .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget the bigger delete key, I don't make mistakes.Bigger escape key, sure.
Help counter other people's mistakes.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516693</id>
	<title>The guy who should go to jail...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is the one who made shifted letters come out as small when Caps Lock is on.  That was brain-dead stupid.</p><p>I use caps lock a lot.  Anyone who doesn't, probably doesn't really type very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is the one who made shifted letters come out as small when Caps Lock is on .
That was brain-dead stupid.I use caps lock a lot .
Anyone who does n't , probably does n't really type very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is the one who made shifted letters come out as small when Caps Lock is on.
That was brain-dead stupid.I use caps lock a lot.
Anyone who doesn't, probably doesn't really type very much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522765</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>vicvillainy</author>
	<datestamp>1246284480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you are using insert, delete, home, and end to manage navigation and insert modes then you are using Vim inefficiently. Use 'i' or 'R' to replace insert, 'd' followed by any navigation key to replace delete, and 0, ^, or $ to replace home and end.  The whole point is that you shouldn't need to take your hands away from the home row.  That said, I still use the handy block of six keys above the arrows in pretty much every application outside of Vim and would never suggest that they be removed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are using insert , delete , home , and end to manage navigation and insert modes then you are using Vim inefficiently .
Use 'i ' or 'R ' to replace insert , 'd ' followed by any navigation key to replace delete , and 0 , ^ , or $ to replace home and end .
The whole point is that you should n't need to take your hands away from the home row .
That said , I still use the handy block of six keys above the arrows in pretty much every application outside of Vim and would never suggest that they be removed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are using insert, delete, home, and end to manage navigation and insert modes then you are using Vim inefficiently.
Use 'i' or 'R' to replace insert, 'd' followed by any navigation key to replace delete, and 0, ^, or $ to replace home and end.
The whole point is that you shouldn't need to take your hands away from the home row.
That said, I still use the handy block of six keys above the arrows in pretty much every application outside of Vim and would never suggest that they be removed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517573</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246304700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, I dunno....</p><p>Nothing starts the day off better than a good boffin'!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I dunno....Nothing starts the day off better than a good boffin ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I dunno....Nothing starts the day off better than a good boffin'!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509889</id>
	<title>Re:So conflicted...</title>
	<author>DustyShadow</author>
	<datestamp>1246211040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lenovo has adware in their updates,</p> </div><p>This is true? Why have I not heard of this?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo has adware in their updates , This is true ?
Why have I not heard of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo has adware in their updates, This is true?
Why have I not heard of this?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511531</id>
	<title>Re:Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>hahn</author>
	<datestamp>1246271220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Caps Lock function can easily be retained by software means, for example by double tapping Shift (single tap to turn it off).  That way you could use the Caps Lock for the Windows or Apple key, thus freeing up space on the lower left to make the CTRL and ALT keys bigger.  While we're at it, let's throw away the right side CTRL and Alt keys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Caps Lock function can easily be retained by software means , for example by double tapping Shift ( single tap to turn it off ) .
That way you could use the Caps Lock for the Windows or Apple key , thus freeing up space on the lower left to make the CTRL and ALT keys bigger .
While we 're at it , let 's throw away the right side CTRL and Alt keys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Caps Lock function can easily be retained by software means, for example by double tapping Shift (single tap to turn it off).
That way you could use the Caps Lock for the Windows or Apple key, thus freeing up space on the lower left to make the CTRL and ALT keys bigger.
While we're at it, let's throw away the right side CTRL and Alt keys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510323</id>
	<title>Re:So conflicted...</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1246214940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like the first quantum computers are already here!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the first quantum computers are already here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the first quantum computers are already here!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514265</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>halligas</author>
	<datestamp>1246291560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Amen.  This is my pet peeve about Lenovo's.  It is the only keyboard where the Ctrl key is not the lower leftmost.  I find myself hitting fn-alt-delete far too often (to no effect) and thinking that the laptop has ceased functioning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen .
This is my pet peeve about Lenovo 's .
It is the only keyboard where the Ctrl key is not the lower leftmost .
I find myself hitting fn-alt-delete far too often ( to no effect ) and thinking that the laptop has ceased functioning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen.
This is my pet peeve about Lenovo's.
It is the only keyboard where the Ctrl key is not the lower leftmost.
I find myself hitting fn-alt-delete far too often (to no effect) and thinking that the laptop has ceased functioning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510481</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>ThousandStars</author>
	<datestamp>1246216380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure they <i>can</i>--for example, some people with RSI problems swear by the Kinesis Advantage, which has an unusual design that allegedly prevents some wrist/elbow problems. Even barring that, it's still possible to improve on the Model M, even if no one has. <p>And this is coming from the guy who wrote <a href="http://jseliger.com/2008/05/07/product-review-unicomp-customizer-keyboard/" title="jseliger.com">this glowing review</a> [jseliger.com] of the Unicomp Customizer, which is a modern Model M.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure they can--for example , some people with RSI problems swear by the Kinesis Advantage , which has an unusual design that allegedly prevents some wrist/elbow problems .
Even barring that , it 's still possible to improve on the Model M , even if no one has .
And this is coming from the guy who wrote this glowing review [ jseliger.com ] of the Unicomp Customizer , which is a modern Model M .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure they can--for example, some people with RSI problems swear by the Kinesis Advantage, which has an unusual design that allegedly prevents some wrist/elbow problems.
Even barring that, it's still possible to improve on the Model M, even if no one has.
And this is coming from the guy who wrote this glowing review [jseliger.com] of the Unicomp Customizer, which is a modern Model M.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511963</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1246275480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm old enough to have actually had a class on typing.  The caps lock key make sense whenever your string of caps'd letters will be about five characters or more, for the simple reason that the shift keys interfere with your touch-typing rhythm.</p><p>That said, I can see the benefit of sticking control in that position on a laptop.  As long as you can attach a real keyboard when you need to do some serious typing, or issue a control sequence that enters you into a similar state.</p><p>I've always found laptop layouts to be a little constricting anyway, probably because of smaller keys or tighter spacing.  Which is unfortunate, because the keys themselves are generally quite amenable to touch-typing.  Much better than the rubber bubble keyboards that are impossible to avoid at consumer pricing levels now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm old enough to have actually had a class on typing .
The caps lock key make sense whenever your string of caps 'd letters will be about five characters or more , for the simple reason that the shift keys interfere with your touch-typing rhythm.That said , I can see the benefit of sticking control in that position on a laptop .
As long as you can attach a real keyboard when you need to do some serious typing , or issue a control sequence that enters you into a similar state.I 've always found laptop layouts to be a little constricting anyway , probably because of smaller keys or tighter spacing .
Which is unfortunate , because the keys themselves are generally quite amenable to touch-typing .
Much better than the rubber bubble keyboards that are impossible to avoid at consumer pricing levels now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm old enough to have actually had a class on typing.
The caps lock key make sense whenever your string of caps'd letters will be about five characters or more, for the simple reason that the shift keys interfere with your touch-typing rhythm.That said, I can see the benefit of sticking control in that position on a laptop.
As long as you can attach a real keyboard when you need to do some serious typing, or issue a control sequence that enters you into a similar state.I've always found laptop layouts to be a little constricting anyway, probably because of smaller keys or tighter spacing.
Which is unfortunate, because the keys themselves are generally quite amenable to touch-typing.
Much better than the rubber bubble keyboards that are impossible to avoid at consumer pricing levels now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510901</id>
	<title>More important</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1246306560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would be to kill finally the caps lock key and replace it with a hard to reach key combination!<br>I dont know how many times I fell over the caps lock key in my life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be to kill finally the caps lock key and replace it with a hard to reach key combination ! I dont know how many times I fell over the caps lock key in my life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be to kill finally the caps lock key and replace it with a hard to reach key combination!I dont know how many times I fell over the caps lock key in my life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509505</id>
	<title>Esc Key?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246207380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I was thinking just the other day that I hardly ever use the escape key. It just doesn't come up as a useful or needed key very much. Even for some in-game menus, I usually hit the Cancel or X buttons with my mouse before even thinking about using the escape key.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I was thinking just the other day that I hardly ever use the escape key .
It just does n't come up as a useful or needed key very much .
Even for some in-game menus , I usually hit the Cancel or X buttons with my mouse before even thinking about using the escape key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I was thinking just the other day that I hardly ever use the escape key.
It just doesn't come up as a useful or needed key very much.
Even for some in-game menus, I usually hit the Cancel or X buttons with my mouse before even thinking about using the escape key.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Yep, the key to the left of "A" should be Ctrl.</i> <br> <br>Why?  Because some obsolete VT-52 or obscure Wyse terminal had it there?  What are you going to do with the right ctrl key if you move the left one above the shift key?  Place it above the right shift key where the enter key is? Or perhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?<br> <br>
No, the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key.  The number keys and cursor control keys should never have been allowed to mix.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , the key to the left of " A " should be Ctrl .
Why ? Because some obsolete VT-52 or obscure Wyse terminal had it there ?
What are you going to do with the right ctrl key if you move the left one above the shift key ?
Place it above the right shift key where the enter key is ?
Or perhaps you 'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout ?
No , the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key .
The number keys and cursor control keys should never have been allowed to mix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, the key to the left of "A" should be Ctrl.
Why?  Because some obsolete VT-52 or obscure Wyse terminal had it there?
What are you going to do with the right ctrl key if you move the left one above the shift key?
Place it above the right shift key where the enter key is?
Or perhaps you'd leave the right ctrl key where it is and have an asymmetric modifier key layout?
No, the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key.
The number keys and cursor control keys should never have been allowed to mix.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510179</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Al Dimond</author>
	<datestamp>1246213620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why must the modifier layout be symmetric?  Because some keyboard you're used to has it that way (the typical keyboard today doesn't... it has a menu key on one side but not the other)?  I'm pretty neutral on the placement of Ctrl; my current keyboard at home has it left of the A key and has no right Ctrl (it's a Sun Type 6 Unix board), but I get along fine at work with more typical layouts.  When the Ctrl keys are on the bottom row, because they're on the corners, I tend to hit them with my palms instead of my fingers so I don't have to move my hands so much.  When it's on the home row you don't need a right Ctrl because it's close enough to the middle of the board that you can still type with your left hand.  Ctrl+Alt bindings are a pain on my keyboard, but they're pretty rare these days and they're not really necessary given the wealth of modifier keys on today's keyboards.

<p>I agree about NumLock, except of course in the case where there's not room for a navigation block.  I keep NumLock off when navigating web pages, because the numpad puts all the navigation keys in reach without moving my hand.  I hardly think that's a pressing enough use to justify the feature.  Software is, of course, perfectly capable of ignoring NumLock.  IIRC Plan 9 always keeps the NumLock LED lit and treats those keys as number keys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why must the modifier layout be symmetric ?
Because some keyboard you 're used to has it that way ( the typical keyboard today does n't... it has a menu key on one side but not the other ) ?
I 'm pretty neutral on the placement of Ctrl ; my current keyboard at home has it left of the A key and has no right Ctrl ( it 's a Sun Type 6 Unix board ) , but I get along fine at work with more typical layouts .
When the Ctrl keys are on the bottom row , because they 're on the corners , I tend to hit them with my palms instead of my fingers so I do n't have to move my hands so much .
When it 's on the home row you do n't need a right Ctrl because it 's close enough to the middle of the board that you can still type with your left hand .
Ctrl + Alt bindings are a pain on my keyboard , but they 're pretty rare these days and they 're not really necessary given the wealth of modifier keys on today 's keyboards .
I agree about NumLock , except of course in the case where there 's not room for a navigation block .
I keep NumLock off when navigating web pages , because the numpad puts all the navigation keys in reach without moving my hand .
I hardly think that 's a pressing enough use to justify the feature .
Software is , of course , perfectly capable of ignoring NumLock .
IIRC Plan 9 always keeps the NumLock LED lit and treats those keys as number keys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why must the modifier layout be symmetric?
Because some keyboard you're used to has it that way (the typical keyboard today doesn't... it has a menu key on one side but not the other)?
I'm pretty neutral on the placement of Ctrl; my current keyboard at home has it left of the A key and has no right Ctrl (it's a Sun Type 6 Unix board), but I get along fine at work with more typical layouts.
When the Ctrl keys are on the bottom row, because they're on the corners, I tend to hit them with my palms instead of my fingers so I don't have to move my hands so much.
When it's on the home row you don't need a right Ctrl because it's close enough to the middle of the board that you can still type with your left hand.
Ctrl+Alt bindings are a pain on my keyboard, but they're pretty rare these days and they're not really necessary given the wealth of modifier keys on today's keyboards.
I agree about NumLock, except of course in the case where there's not room for a navigation block.
I keep NumLock off when navigating web pages, because the numpad puts all the navigation keys in reach without moving my hand.
I hardly think that's a pressing enough use to justify the feature.
Software is, of course, perfectly capable of ignoring NumLock.
IIRC Plan 9 always keeps the NumLock LED lit and treats those keys as number keys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511361</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>bemymonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1246269420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is scroll lock for anyway?</p><p>Print screen, on the other hand, I find rather useful. No need for "screen capture applications" or other crap like that. Just print screen and paste into Paint/Photoshop/PSP...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is scroll lock for anyway ? Print screen , on the other hand , I find rather useful .
No need for " screen capture applications " or other crap like that .
Just print screen and paste into Paint/Photoshop/PSP.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is scroll lock for anyway?Print screen, on the other hand, I find rather useful.
No need for "screen capture applications" or other crap like that.
Just print screen and paste into Paint/Photoshop/PSP...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515401</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246296540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the double-U key you wanted enlarged, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the double-U key you wanted enlarged , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the double-U key you wanted enlarged, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510437</id>
	<title>Re:HERE'S AN IDEA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246216080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw that.  I want a mind reader.  Interface directly to my tinfoil hat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw that .
I want a mind reader .
Interface directly to my tinfoil hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw that.
I want a mind reader.
Interface directly to my tinfoil hat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514329</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>HAKdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1246291860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For what it's worth, those keyboard shortcuts were in Mac OS way before Windows had them. Also, it's the "command key" not the "Mac key".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For what it 's worth , those keyboard shortcuts were in Mac OS way before Windows had them .
Also , it 's the " command key " not the " Mac key " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For what it's worth, those keyboard shortcuts were in Mac OS way before Windows had them.
Also, it's the "command key" not the "Mac key".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28534781</id>
	<title>They killed INS--you bastards!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246356360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, does this ever strike me as a "solution in search of a problem."</p><p>I can almost deal with the enlarged keys--though hitting them wasn't particularly hard to begin with, and larger keys tend to stick more often--but to make room they had to shrink the F-keys and move INS.</p><p>Bastards!</p><p>Coders use the INS key for overwrite, as does anyone who remembers the original, pre-Mac-ified PC keyboard shortcuts for copy and paste. Much business software lean heavily on the F-keys. Now, not only is the six-pad in the wrong location (which can't be helped on a notebook), but the relative key positions are broken, and the F-keys are a chiclet-sized ergonomic nightmare of an afterthought. Don't they realize how badly this screws with touch typing?</p><p>So much for this being a "business oriented" machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , does this ever strike me as a " solution in search of a problem .
" I can almost deal with the enlarged keys--though hitting them was n't particularly hard to begin with , and larger keys tend to stick more often--but to make room they had to shrink the F-keys and move INS.Bastards ! Coders use the INS key for overwrite , as does anyone who remembers the original , pre-Mac-ified PC keyboard shortcuts for copy and paste .
Much business software lean heavily on the F-keys .
Now , not only is the six-pad in the wrong location ( which ca n't be helped on a notebook ) , but the relative key positions are broken , and the F-keys are a chiclet-sized ergonomic nightmare of an afterthought .
Do n't they realize how badly this screws with touch typing ? So much for this being a " business oriented " machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, does this ever strike me as a "solution in search of a problem.
"I can almost deal with the enlarged keys--though hitting them wasn't particularly hard to begin with, and larger keys tend to stick more often--but to make room they had to shrink the F-keys and move INS.Bastards!Coders use the INS key for overwrite, as does anyone who remembers the original, pre-Mac-ified PC keyboard shortcuts for copy and paste.
Much business software lean heavily on the F-keys.
Now, not only is the six-pad in the wrong location (which can't be helped on a notebook), but the relative key positions are broken, and the F-keys are a chiclet-sized ergonomic nightmare of an afterthought.
Don't they realize how badly this screws with touch typing?So much for this being a "business oriented" machine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511983</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246275720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you'll find that standard English is what they speak in England. British commonwealth countries and most of Europe teaches this version, not US English in their schools.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 'll find that standard English is what they speak in England .
British commonwealth countries and most of Europe teaches this version , not US English in their schools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you'll find that standard English is what they speak in England.
British commonwealth countries and most of Europe teaches this version, not US English in their schools.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514271</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>TonTonKill</author>
	<datestamp>1246291560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Num Lock is all the way over there, do you think I have the energy to move my entire arm that far?  I've had auto-run bound to Q since EverQuest.</p><p>Caps Lock, on the other hand, is often the run/walk toggle in stealthier FPS games.  Much easier than holding down shift for extended periods of time.</p><p>Finally, if you want to make Escape and Delete easier to hit, make the keyboard larger so you can place them in the correct locations.  Making them bigger isn't going to stop me from having to hunt them down if they're 3" away from where they should be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Num Lock is all the way over there , do you think I have the energy to move my entire arm that far ?
I 've had auto-run bound to Q since EverQuest.Caps Lock , on the other hand , is often the run/walk toggle in stealthier FPS games .
Much easier than holding down shift for extended periods of time.Finally , if you want to make Escape and Delete easier to hit , make the keyboard larger so you can place them in the correct locations .
Making them bigger is n't going to stop me from having to hunt them down if they 're 3 " away from where they should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Num Lock is all the way over there, do you think I have the energy to move my entire arm that far?
I've had auto-run bound to Q since EverQuest.Caps Lock, on the other hand, is often the run/walk toggle in stealthier FPS games.
Much easier than holding down shift for extended periods of time.Finally, if you want to make Escape and Delete easier to hit, make the keyboard larger so you can place them in the correct locations.
Making them bigger isn't going to stop me from having to hunt them down if they're 3" away from where they should be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511155</id>
	<title>Great news for VI users</title>
	<author>mbierenfeld</author>
	<datestamp>1246266420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the size and the placement of theses keys annoyed me too long</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the size and the placement of theses keys annoyed me too long</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the size and the placement of theses keys annoyed me too long</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512317</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1246279080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's an exceedingly annoying 'standard' that makes reading SQL vastly harder than it should be. I think it originally stemmed from people misunderstanding the syntax diagrams in books where the keywords were shown in all capitals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's an exceedingly annoying 'standard ' that makes reading SQL vastly harder than it should be .
I think it originally stemmed from people misunderstanding the syntax diagrams in books where the keywords were shown in all capitals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's an exceedingly annoying 'standard' that makes reading SQL vastly harder than it should be.
I think it originally stemmed from people misunderstanding the syntax diagrams in books where the keywords were shown in all capitals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510627</id>
	<title>Re:caps lock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>SO TRUE</htmltext>
<tokenext>SO TRUE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SO TRUE</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513427</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1246287240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately. I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement</i></p><p>Exactly.  The more often you use a key, the more practice you get at hitting it, so you don't need to make it any larger.  I think these designers are working from faulty assumptions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>However , I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately .
I would venture to say the same for the delete key , which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placementExactly .
The more often you use a key , the more practice you get at hitting it , so you do n't need to make it any larger .
I think these designers are working from faulty assumptions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.
I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placementExactly.
The more often you use a key, the more practice you get at hitting it, so you don't need to make it any larger.
I think these designers are working from faulty assumptions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514999</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1246294920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use an all-caps face for text styles that need to be in all caps, and you won't have to type them in caps any more. In fact, I seem to dimly recall that it's a checkbox in autocad...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use an all-caps face for text styles that need to be in all caps , and you wo n't have to type them in caps any more .
In fact , I seem to dimly recall that it 's a checkbox in autocad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use an all-caps face for text styles that need to be in all caps, and you won't have to type them in caps any more.
In fact, I seem to dimly recall that it's a checkbox in autocad...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511311</id>
	<title>delete vs backspace</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1246268400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>really? Is it the delete key or is it the backspace key that is used most?<br>Personally, I mostly use the backspace key in favour of the delete key - I think because that's the one that's closer to normal typing keys.</p><p>From personal experience of typing (being a software developer, my life has been on computers for over 15 yrs) - I notice I prefer to backspace over other key combinations.</p><p>Deleting "prefer to" I would backspace X 9, to replace with "'would rather"  instead of [ctrl][shift][left,left][backspace]... but maybe that's just me...<br>I;'d[backspaceX3]'d be interested n[backspace]knowing who the users were[backspaceX4]are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>really ?
Is it the delete key or is it the backspace key that is used most ? Personally , I mostly use the backspace key in favour of the delete key - I think because that 's the one that 's closer to normal typing keys.From personal experience of typing ( being a software developer , my life has been on computers for over 15 yrs ) - I notice I prefer to backspace over other key combinations.Deleting " prefer to " I would backspace X 9 , to replace with " 'would rather " instead of [ ctrl ] [ shift ] [ left,left ] [ backspace ] ... but maybe that 's just me...I ; 'd [ backspaceX3 ] 'd be interested n [ backspace ] knowing who the users were [ backspaceX4 ] are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really?
Is it the delete key or is it the backspace key that is used most?Personally, I mostly use the backspace key in favour of the delete key - I think because that's the one that's closer to normal typing keys.From personal experience of typing (being a software developer, my life has been on computers for over 15 yrs) - I notice I prefer to backspace over other key combinations.Deleting "prefer to" I would backspace X 9, to replace with "'would rather"  instead of [ctrl][shift][left,left][backspace]... but maybe that's just me...I;'d[backspaceX3]'d be interested n[backspace]knowing who the users were[backspaceX4]are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Making the "Delete" key larger isn't a bad idea. But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there, maybe they should make the "Control" and "Alt" keys larger as well...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Making the " Delete " key larger is n't a bad idea .
But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there , maybe they should make the " Control " and " Alt " keys larger as well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making the "Delete" key larger isn't a bad idea.
But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there, maybe they should make the "Control" and "Alt" keys larger as well...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513321</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1246286640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As for num lock, I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it *off*. And I never use it - there's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY.</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't look now, but I think there's some kids on your lawn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As for num lock , I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it * off * .
And I never use it - there 's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY.Do n't look now , but I think there 's some kids on your lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As for num lock, I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it *off*.
And I never use it - there's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY.Don't look now, but I think there's some kids on your lawn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509431</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1246206840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?</p></div><p>Yeah, of course!</p><p>What do you think Ada Lovelace, the first programmer, used to code with?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century ? Yeah , of course ! What do you think Ada Lovelace , the first programmer , used to code with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They had laptops or typewriters with function and modifier keys in the 19th century?Yeah, of course!What do you think Ada Lovelace, the first programmer, used to code with?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511427</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>The Cisco Kid</author>
	<datestamp>1246270380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, because that is where all *computer* keyboards had it. This 'shift lock' nonsense only came about when they tried to mimic typewriters. Caps lock serves *no* good purpose and should be ditched, or at least relegated to somewhere away from the useful keys. And who the hell needs an extra 'right' control key anyway? Why is it even there? There was never one on any original *computer* keyboard. If a keyboard has this stupid 'shift (caps) lock' key to the left of A, its a *typewriter keyboard* layout, NOT a computer keyboard layout.</p><p>As for num lock, I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it *off*. And I never use it - there's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , because that is where all * computer * keyboards had it .
This 'shift lock ' nonsense only came about when they tried to mimic typewriters .
Caps lock serves * no * good purpose and should be ditched , or at least relegated to somewhere away from the useful keys .
And who the hell needs an extra 'right ' control key anyway ?
Why is it even there ?
There was never one on any original * computer * keyboard .
If a keyboard has this stupid 'shift ( caps ) lock ' key to the left of A , its a * typewriter keyboard * layout , NOT a computer keyboard layout.As for num lock , I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it * off * .
And I never use it - there 's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, because that is where all *computer* keyboards had it.
This 'shift lock' nonsense only came about when they tried to mimic typewriters.
Caps lock serves *no* good purpose and should be ditched, or at least relegated to somewhere away from the useful keys.
And who the hell needs an extra 'right' control key anyway?
Why is it even there?
There was never one on any original *computer* keyboard.
If a keyboard has this stupid 'shift (caps) lock' key to the left of A, its a *typewriter keyboard* layout, NOT a computer keyboard layout.As for num lock, I routinely set the CMOS on any machine I use to force it *off*.
And I never use it - there's a perfectly good set of numbers right above the QWERTY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510037</id>
	<title>Re:DVORAK</title>
	<author>Crossmire</author>
	<datestamp>1246212180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I find to be "radical" is that you expect the average person cares enough about typing efficiency to go through the effort of learning a new keyboard layout.</p><p>I care, so I learnt Dvorak, but don't expect the rest of the world to care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I find to be " radical " is that you expect the average person cares enough about typing efficiency to go through the effort of learning a new keyboard layout.I care , so I learnt Dvorak , but do n't expect the rest of the world to care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I find to be "radical" is that you expect the average person cares enough about typing efficiency to go through the effort of learning a new keyboard layout.I care, so I learnt Dvorak, but don't expect the rest of the world to care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510625</id>
	<title>I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine"</title>
	<author>mfurqanlatif</author>
	<datestamp>1246217340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs, such as shrunken space bars and control keys, miniscule arrow keys, or nonstandard placement of arrow keys, etc.

However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately. I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement. I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative.

For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design. Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

<a href="http://www.frames4sale.com/" title="frames4sale.com" rel="nofollow"> Eye Glasses</a> [frames4sale.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am happy to see some thought go in to " routine " matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs , such as shrunken space bars and control keys , miniscule arrow keys , or nonstandard placement of arrow keys , etc .
However , I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately .
I would venture to say the same for the delete key , which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement .
I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative .
For my money , I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design .
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: ) Eye Glasses [ frames4sale.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs, such as shrunken space bars and control keys, miniscule arrow keys, or nonstandard placement of arrow keys, etc.
However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.
I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement.
I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative.
For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)

 Eye Glasses [frames4sale.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513129</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>C0vardeAn0nim0</author>
	<datestamp>1246285080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>here's how on wondows 2000/XP:</p><p>open regedt32 and go to HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layout</p><p>then add a binary entry called Scancode Map with a value of 00000000 00000000 03000000 3A001D00 1D003A00 00000000</p><p>done.</p><p>on linux, KDE4 already have an option to swap ctrl and caps on the keyboard configuration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>here 's how on wondows 2000/XP : open regedt32 and go to HKEY \ _LOCAL \ _MACHINE \ SYSTEM \ CurrentControlSet \ Control \ Keyboard Layoutthen add a binary entry called Scancode Map with a value of 00000000 00000000 03000000 3A001D00 1D003A00 00000000done.on linux , KDE4 already have an option to swap ctrl and caps on the keyboard configuration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here's how on wondows 2000/XP:open regedt32 and go to HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layoutthen add a binary entry called Scancode Map with a value of 00000000 00000000 03000000 3A001D00 1D003A00 00000000done.on linux, KDE4 already have an option to swap ctrl and caps on the keyboard configuration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1246285860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think his point was that the button needs to be removed, or removed from where it is, not that the function itself be eliminated.</p><p>It's interesting to hear all the arguments about NumLock, CapsLock, PrintScreen, Pause/Break, ScrollLock, etc.  Nearly everybody sees that one key is useless, while their "preferred" key is quite useful, or the best thing since sliced bread.</p><p>All of those keys have essentially been repurposed by programmers.  Scroll Lock would seemingly not have a purpose, yet it lives on in KVM systems *precisely* <i>because</i> it has no purpose.  How long has it been since the Pause/Break key actually did a "Pause"?  I would bet that the Break part is mostly used in Linux/Unix environments or the command line, although Ctrl-C seems to be a working substitute 99\% of the time.  Most games in the past were paused with the P key.  PrintScreen seems to only have a single purpose used by some, but still gets premium space allocated.  CapsLock is just fucking stupid where it is, as big as it is.</p><p>I think we can all agree that the keys have their use by a minority of people and just can't be removed willy nilly.</p><p>So why not just make them 1/5th of the size of regular keys and move them to the topmost part of the keyboard?  While were at it, add a Ctrl-Alt-Del key there too.  Most keyboards, like my Logitech, already have all the function keys 1/3-1/2 the size of regular keys.  Considering that they are not used that often even by the minority that uses them, I say make them much much smaller and get them off the "high frequency" part of the keyboard.</p><p>Absolutely, get rid of the Windows key and the pop-up menu key while were at too.  Move those up with the group and make the Ctrl and Alt keys bigger again.  I think we all use them more often than the Microsoft centric keys.</p><p>The real problem is that we could all probably colloborate on a hell of keyboard that would suit all of our needs.  Unfortunately, the manufacturers still have dipshits working for them that actually had the gall to put a "shopping" key on some keyboards.</p><p>It's that backwards compatibility mantra, or something like doctrine:</p><p>A)  "Let's get rid of the CapsLock key"<br>B)  "Well that's just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... fucking crazy"<br>A)  "It's hardly ever used anymore and we could put something more useful there, maybe even increase the size of other keys"<br>B)  "Well you can't"<br>A)  "Why"<br>B)  "Because you just can't.  It's always been there.  My daddy had it, my daddy's daddy had it.  My son will have it.  Just STFU"</p><p>I love the fact that there are some people at Lenovo that have the balls to push out a new design.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think his point was that the button needs to be removed , or removed from where it is , not that the function itself be eliminated.It 's interesting to hear all the arguments about NumLock , CapsLock , PrintScreen , Pause/Break , ScrollLock , etc .
Nearly everybody sees that one key is useless , while their " preferred " key is quite useful , or the best thing since sliced bread.All of those keys have essentially been repurposed by programmers .
Scroll Lock would seemingly not have a purpose , yet it lives on in KVM systems * precisely * because it has no purpose .
How long has it been since the Pause/Break key actually did a " Pause " ?
I would bet that the Break part is mostly used in Linux/Unix environments or the command line , although Ctrl-C seems to be a working substitute 99 \ % of the time .
Most games in the past were paused with the P key .
PrintScreen seems to only have a single purpose used by some , but still gets premium space allocated .
CapsLock is just fucking stupid where it is , as big as it is.I think we can all agree that the keys have their use by a minority of people and just ca n't be removed willy nilly.So why not just make them 1/5th of the size of regular keys and move them to the topmost part of the keyboard ?
While were at it , add a Ctrl-Alt-Del key there too .
Most keyboards , like my Logitech , already have all the function keys 1/3-1/2 the size of regular keys .
Considering that they are not used that often even by the minority that uses them , I say make them much much smaller and get them off the " high frequency " part of the keyboard.Absolutely , get rid of the Windows key and the pop-up menu key while were at too .
Move those up with the group and make the Ctrl and Alt keys bigger again .
I think we all use them more often than the Microsoft centric keys.The real problem is that we could all probably colloborate on a hell of keyboard that would suit all of our needs .
Unfortunately , the manufacturers still have dipshits working for them that actually had the gall to put a " shopping " key on some keyboards.It 's that backwards compatibility mantra , or something like doctrine : A ) " Let 's get rid of the CapsLock key " B ) " Well that 's just .... fucking crazy " A ) " It 's hardly ever used anymore and we could put something more useful there , maybe even increase the size of other keys " B ) " Well you ca n't " A ) " Why " B ) " Because you just ca n't .
It 's always been there .
My daddy had it , my daddy 's daddy had it .
My son will have it .
Just STFU " I love the fact that there are some people at Lenovo that have the balls to push out a new design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think his point was that the button needs to be removed, or removed from where it is, not that the function itself be eliminated.It's interesting to hear all the arguments about NumLock, CapsLock, PrintScreen, Pause/Break, ScrollLock, etc.
Nearly everybody sees that one key is useless, while their "preferred" key is quite useful, or the best thing since sliced bread.All of those keys have essentially been repurposed by programmers.
Scroll Lock would seemingly not have a purpose, yet it lives on in KVM systems *precisely* because it has no purpose.
How long has it been since the Pause/Break key actually did a "Pause"?
I would bet that the Break part is mostly used in Linux/Unix environments or the command line, although Ctrl-C seems to be a working substitute 99\% of the time.
Most games in the past were paused with the P key.
PrintScreen seems to only have a single purpose used by some, but still gets premium space allocated.
CapsLock is just fucking stupid where it is, as big as it is.I think we can all agree that the keys have their use by a minority of people and just can't be removed willy nilly.So why not just make them 1/5th of the size of regular keys and move them to the topmost part of the keyboard?
While were at it, add a Ctrl-Alt-Del key there too.
Most keyboards, like my Logitech, already have all the function keys 1/3-1/2 the size of regular keys.
Considering that they are not used that often even by the minority that uses them, I say make them much much smaller and get them off the "high frequency" part of the keyboard.Absolutely, get rid of the Windows key and the pop-up menu key while were at too.
Move those up with the group and make the Ctrl and Alt keys bigger again.
I think we all use them more often than the Microsoft centric keys.The real problem is that we could all probably colloborate on a hell of keyboard that would suit all of our needs.
Unfortunately, the manufacturers still have dipshits working for them that actually had the gall to put a "shopping" key on some keyboards.It's that backwards compatibility mantra, or something like doctrine:A)  "Let's get rid of the CapsLock key"B)  "Well that's just .... fucking crazy"A)  "It's hardly ever used anymore and we could put something more useful there, maybe even increase the size of other keys"B)  "Well you can't"A)  "Why"B)  "Because you just can't.
It's always been there.
My daddy had it, my daddy's daddy had it.
My son will have it.
Just STFU"I love the fact that there are some people at Lenovo that have the balls to push out a new design.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509547</id>
	<title>while they are at it</title>
	<author>Gresyth</author>
	<datestamp>1246207680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>they could also add they letters "ANY" to the space bar. Help desks the world over will be eternally grateful</htmltext>
<tokenext>they could also add they letters " ANY " to the space bar .
Help desks the world over will be eternally grateful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they could also add they letters "ANY" to the space bar.
Help desks the world over will be eternally grateful</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510969</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1246307280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>I'd just like a keyboard with proper generic unbranded Super and Meta (and possibly Hyper) keys on top of the shift and Alt ones. No fruits, birds, building openings or anything. A compose key should be part of the default as well.</p><p>A lot of laptop keyboards are severely lacking in the modifier key department (on top of the Windows branding).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: ) I 'd just like a keyboard with proper generic unbranded Super and Meta ( and possibly Hyper ) keys on top of the shift and Alt ones .
No fruits , birds , building openings or anything .
A compose key should be part of the default as well.A lot of laptop keyboards are severely lacking in the modifier key department ( on top of the Windows branding ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)I'd just like a keyboard with proper generic unbranded Super and Meta (and possibly Hyper) keys on top of the shift and Alt ones.
No fruits, birds, building openings or anything.
A compose key should be part of the default as well.A lot of laptop keyboards are severely lacking in the modifier key department (on top of the Windows branding).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>patro</author>
	<datestamp>1246211820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just because he doesn't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world doesn't mean the key isn't highly useful to application developers.  I'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example.</p><p>DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his<br>/<br>COMMIT</p></div><p>Well, if you have a proper editor you don't need to type those keywords in caps, because the editor does it for you automatically.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because he does n't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world does n't mean the key is n't highly useful to application developers .
I 'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example.DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his/COMMITWell , if you have a proper editor you do n't need to type those keywords in caps , because the editor does it for you automatically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because he doesn't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world doesn't mean the key isn't highly useful to application developers.
I'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example.DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his/COMMITWell, if you have a proper editor you don't need to type those keywords in caps, because the editor does it for you automatically.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512393</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>delire</author>
	<datestamp>1246279800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not just get rid of that pesky last remaining mouse button while you're at it..
<br> <br>
Insert, Del, Home and End are indispensible for me in my IDE (Vim) and my 3D authoring environment (Blender) alongwith several other applications I use most days. Function keys are very useful for mapping to function menus and switching consoles on a Linux system. Admittedly I rarely use all twelve..
<br> <br>
People that suggest removing keys willy-nilly reveal themselves as heavy mouse users. In my experience the more events that are pushed onto the pointer, lest of all those that require two hands (like the Apple 'right click'), are RSI prone and functionally slower to work with. The lack of delete key on a Mac is very much an example of the direction not to go in, creating the need for an additional hand movement.
<br> <br>
Since owning a Thinkpad I can work more comfortably for more time without feeling strain. This is due to the sanity of placing the 'nipple' in the middle of the keyboard (reducing hand movement) and a very well designed, robust keyboard with well sprung keys with plenty of travel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just get rid of that pesky last remaining mouse button while you 're at it. . Insert , Del , Home and End are indispensible for me in my IDE ( Vim ) and my 3D authoring environment ( Blender ) alongwith several other applications I use most days .
Function keys are very useful for mapping to function menus and switching consoles on a Linux system .
Admittedly I rarely use all twelve. . People that suggest removing keys willy-nilly reveal themselves as heavy mouse users .
In my experience the more events that are pushed onto the pointer , lest of all those that require two hands ( like the Apple 'right click ' ) , are RSI prone and functionally slower to work with .
The lack of delete key on a Mac is very much an example of the direction not to go in , creating the need for an additional hand movement .
Since owning a Thinkpad I can work more comfortably for more time without feeling strain .
This is due to the sanity of placing the 'nipple ' in the middle of the keyboard ( reducing hand movement ) and a very well designed , robust keyboard with well sprung keys with plenty of travel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just get rid of that pesky last remaining mouse button while you're at it..
 
Insert, Del, Home and End are indispensible for me in my IDE (Vim) and my 3D authoring environment (Blender) alongwith several other applications I use most days.
Function keys are very useful for mapping to function menus and switching consoles on a Linux system.
Admittedly I rarely use all twelve..
 
People that suggest removing keys willy-nilly reveal themselves as heavy mouse users.
In my experience the more events that are pushed onto the pointer, lest of all those that require two hands (like the Apple 'right click'), are RSI prone and functionally slower to work with.
The lack of delete key on a Mac is very much an example of the direction not to go in, creating the need for an additional hand movement.
Since owning a Thinkpad I can work more comfortably for more time without feeling strain.
This is due to the sanity of placing the 'nipple' in the middle of the keyboard (reducing hand movement) and a very well designed, robust keyboard with well sprung keys with plenty of travel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522051</id>
	<title>Lenovo?!? Three Words</title>
	<author>Old Sparky</author>
	<datestamp>1246280460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thinkpad Netbook Trackpoint<br>Thinkpad Netbook Trackpoint<br>Thinkpad Netbook Trackpoint<br>Thinkpad Netbook Trackpoint</p><p>Repeat Ad Infinitum</p><p>When Oh WHEN Lenovo?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointRepeat Ad InfinitumWhen Oh WHEN Lenovo ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointThinkpad Netbook TrackpointRepeat Ad InfinitumWhen Oh WHEN Lenovo?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509981</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246211700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design. Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Hear, hear!  I've used Thinkpads for years, and I think that IBM got things right with the Thinkpad keyboards (it seems like they worked out their badness with the PC keyboards).  IBM has the very best laptop keyboards.  I wish that Lenovo wouldn't screw things up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; For my money , I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design .
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: ) Hear , hear !
I 've used Thinkpads for years , and I think that IBM got things right with the Thinkpad keyboards ( it seems like they worked out their badness with the PC keyboards ) .
IBM has the very best laptop keyboards .
I wish that Lenovo would n't screw things up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)Hear, hear!
I've used Thinkpads for years, and I think that IBM got things right with the Thinkpad keyboards (it seems like they worked out their badness with the PC keyboards).
IBM has the very best laptop keyboards.
I wish that Lenovo wouldn't screw things up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510371</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246215360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why stop there? The IBM Selectric is a bunch of new-fangled nonsense. In my telegraph office the keyboard only had one key and WE LIKED IT.
<br> <br>
<b>--.-  .  -..</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why stop there ?
The IBM Selectric is a bunch of new-fangled nonsense .
In my telegraph office the keyboard only had one key and WE LIKED IT .
--.- .
-. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why stop there?
The IBM Selectric is a bunch of new-fangled nonsense.
In my telegraph office the keyboard only had one key and WE LIKED IT.
--.-  .
-..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509715</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>shird</author>
	<datestamp>1246209060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why did you mention the U key twice? and yes, I get your joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why did you mention the U key twice ?
and yes , I get your joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why did you mention the U key twice?
and yes, I get your joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>davevt5</author>
	<datestamp>1246209840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a Lenovo T400 and the placement of the DEL key always annoyed me. I use a program called KeyTweak (http://webpages.charter.net/krumsick/) to remap my lenovo keyboard as follows:</p><p>Right CTRL key is DEL<br>Those silly keys to the right and left of the up arrow are HOME and END</p><p>And finally, drum roll please... the CAPS key is mapped to the TAB key so I have a gigantic space to mash my chubby fingers when looking for a tab stop!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Lenovo T400 and the placement of the DEL key always annoyed me .
I use a program called KeyTweak ( http : //webpages.charter.net/krumsick/ ) to remap my lenovo keyboard as follows : Right CTRL key is DELThose silly keys to the right and left of the up arrow are HOME and ENDAnd finally , drum roll please... the CAPS key is mapped to the TAB key so I have a gigantic space to mash my chubby fingers when looking for a tab stop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Lenovo T400 and the placement of the DEL key always annoyed me.
I use a program called KeyTweak (http://webpages.charter.net/krumsick/) to remap my lenovo keyboard as follows:Right CTRL key is DELThose silly keys to the right and left of the up arrow are HOME and ENDAnd finally, drum roll please... the CAPS key is mapped to the TAB key so I have a gigantic space to mash my chubby fingers when looking for a tab stop!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510201</id>
	<title>Stop messing with the keyboard</title>
	<author>thirdworldpeasant</author>
	<datestamp>1246213740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Fn key in place of the Ctrl key took me months to get used to. I'm not buying more changes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Fn key in place of the Ctrl key took me months to get used to .
I 'm not buying more changes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Fn key in place of the Ctrl key took me months to get used to.
I'm not buying more changes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509781</id>
	<title>Bring back the LOCK key I say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246209720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caps-lock is handy on occasion - it's just the implementation that's flawed on modern keyboards.  Bring back the system where you held SHIFT then pressed LOCK, a-la 19th century typewriters through to some very early personal computers, and you can have the feature without the pain of accidental shouting and messed-up passwords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caps-lock is handy on occasion - it 's just the implementation that 's flawed on modern keyboards .
Bring back the system where you held SHIFT then pressed LOCK , a-la 19th century typewriters through to some very early personal computers , and you can have the feature without the pain of accidental shouting and messed-up passwords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caps-lock is handy on occasion - it's just the implementation that's flawed on modern keyboards.
Bring back the system where you held SHIFT then pressed LOCK, a-la 19th century typewriters through to some very early personal computers, and you can have the feature without the pain of accidental shouting and messed-up passwords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519683</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1246269480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Apple keyboard has 19 Function keys-- which is ironic because the Macintosh was designed to make function keys obsolete. Before the Macintosh, many programs came with keyboard templates to remind the user what control-shift-f6 actually did in a particular program. (The Apple II didn't use function keys, but rather control<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,and in the case of the Apple<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/// and Apple<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//e, the open apple and closed apple,  combinations). Open Apple Q to quit, and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Apple keyboard has 19 Function keys-- which is ironic because the Macintosh was designed to make function keys obsolete .
Before the Macintosh , many programs came with keyboard templates to remind the user what control-shift-f6 actually did in a particular program .
( The Apple II did n't use function keys , but rather control ,and in the case of the Apple /// and Apple //e , the open apple and closed apple , combinations ) .
Open Apple Q to quit , and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Apple keyboard has 19 Function keys-- which is ironic because the Macintosh was designed to make function keys obsolete.
Before the Macintosh, many programs came with keyboard templates to remind the user what control-shift-f6 actually did in a particular program.
(The Apple II didn't use function keys, but rather control ,and in the case of the Apple /// and Apple //e, the open apple and closed apple,  combinations).
Open Apple Q to quit, and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510735</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caps lock has some usefulness for users with non-US keyboards who can&rsquo;t obtain the uppercase variant of some letters because shift-typing that letter will give them a different letter. It&rsquo;s easier to use than &ldquo;compose&rdquo;.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caps lock has some usefulness for users with non-US keyboards who can    t obtain the uppercase variant of some letters because shift-typing that letter will give them a different letter .
It    s easier to use than    compose    .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caps lock has some usefulness for users with non-US keyboards who can’t obtain the uppercase variant of some letters because shift-typing that letter will give them a different letter.
It’s easier to use than “compose”.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512929</id>
	<title>Re:So conflicted...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246283940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But the Caps Lock has more uses than just CAPITALIZING EVERYTHING.<br>On some keyboard layouts, especially ones I design, the CAPS LOCK key creates an alternate layout, like I have a phonetic Russian Keyboard, and [CAPS] switches it to English. if anything, we need more keys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the Caps Lock has more uses than just CAPITALIZING EVERYTHING.On some keyboard layouts , especially ones I design , the CAPS LOCK key creates an alternate layout , like I have a phonetic Russian Keyboard , and [ CAPS ] switches it to English .
if anything , we need more keys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the Caps Lock has more uses than just CAPITALIZING EVERYTHING.On some keyboard layouts, especially ones I design, the CAPS LOCK key creates an alternate layout, like I have a phonetic Russian Keyboard, and [CAPS] switches it to English.
if anything, we need more keys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510907</id>
	<title>Re:Article?!?</title>
	<author>maglor\_83</author>
	<datestamp>1246306560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's so much they could have elaborated on, like the "years of research"</p></div><p>Well, not long after they bought Thinkpad from IBM, they put out a Lenovo update that installed a key logger for their "research". Billions of customer-dollars later and here are the results!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's so much they could have elaborated on , like the " years of research " Well , not long after they bought Thinkpad from IBM , they put out a Lenovo update that installed a key logger for their " research " .
Billions of customer-dollars later and here are the results !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's so much they could have elaborated on, like the "years of research"Well, not long after they bought Thinkpad from IBM, they put out a Lenovo update that installed a key logger for their "research".
Billions of customer-dollars later and here are the results!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510349</id>
	<title>19th century?</title>
	<author>pbjones</author>
	<datestamp>1246215180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wot? they had esc and del keys in the 19th century? surely you jest?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wot ?
they had esc and del keys in the 19th century ?
surely you jest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wot?
they had esc and del keys in the 19th century?
surely you jest?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512133</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246277280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have two U keys?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have two U keys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have two U keys?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511353</id>
	<title>Actual pictures of the new keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246269360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This blog post has actual footage of the new keyboard:</p><p> <a href="http://lenovoblogs.com/designmatters/?p=1489" title="lenovoblogs.com" rel="nofollow">http://lenovoblogs.com/designmatters/?p=1489</a> [lenovoblogs.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This blog post has actual footage of the new keyboard : http : //lenovoblogs.com/designmatters/ ? p = 1489 [ lenovoblogs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This blog post has actual footage of the new keyboard: http://lenovoblogs.com/designmatters/?p=1489 [lenovoblogs.com] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1246217520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh. Insightful, to be honest. Ignoring the Ctrl+Alt+Delete combo, other combinations like Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V are extremely common in every OS except OSX. Alt+F4 is a handy one too.</p><p>I don't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent. Yes, the Windows Key maps to the Mac Key, and all the commands on a Mac are Mac+C, Mac+V, Mac+F4, etc., earning it the title of the only OS that does things a different way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh .
Insightful , to be honest .
Ignoring the Ctrl + Alt + Delete combo , other combinations like Ctrl + C , Ctrl + V are extremely common in every OS except OSX .
Alt + F4 is a handy one too.I do n't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent .
Yes , the Windows Key maps to the Mac Key , and all the commands on a Mac are Mac + C , Mac + V , Mac + F4 , etc. , earning it the title of the only OS that does things a different way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh.
Insightful, to be honest.
Ignoring the Ctrl+Alt+Delete combo, other combinations like Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V are extremely common in every OS except OSX.
Alt+F4 is a handy one too.I don't know why Apple went and turned the Windows Key into their Ctrl equivalent.
Yes, the Windows Key maps to the Mac Key, and all the commands on a Mac are Mac+C, Mac+V, Mac+F4, etc., earning it the title of the only OS that does things a different way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509311</id>
	<title>Article?!?</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the article? I clicked on the link, and it's barely longer than the summary.</p><p>There's so much they could have elaborated on, like the "years of research", and what the hell they mean by "those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo hasn't made any bigger." (Because I highly doubt they've made PrintScreen any bigger)</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the article ?
I clicked on the link , and it 's barely longer than the summary.There 's so much they could have elaborated on , like the " years of research " , and what the hell they mean by " those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo has n't made any bigger .
" ( Because I highly doubt they 've made PrintScreen any bigger ) - RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the article?
I clicked on the link, and it's barely longer than the summary.There's so much they could have elaborated on, like the "years of research", and what the hell they mean by "those were the only non-letter keys that Lenovo hasn't made any bigger.
" (Because I highly doubt they've made PrintScreen any bigger)- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510041</id>
	<title>Please think of the forum junkies</title>
	<author>fragMasterFlash</author>
	<datestamp>1246212180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>On behalf of myself and all the other forum junkies can we please get a larger, ruggedized F5 key?</htmltext>
<tokenext>On behalf of myself and all the other forum junkies can we please get a larger , ruggedized F5 key ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On behalf of myself and all the other forum junkies can we please get a larger, ruggedized F5 key?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509759</id>
	<title>VI and ESC</title>
	<author>Charles Dodgeson</author>
	<datestamp>1246209480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Us vi users probably use the ESC key 700 times per hour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Us vi users probably use the ESC key 700 times per hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Us vi users probably use the ESC key 700 times per hour.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512765</id>
	<title>Re:So conflicted...</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1246282860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lenovo has adware in their updates, but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key! It's like they're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time.</p></div><p>They're Shroedinger's computer company.  You can't tell if they suck or not until you open the box.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo has adware in their updates , but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key !
It 's like they 're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time.They 're Shroedinger 's computer company .
You ca n't tell if they suck or not until you open the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo has adware in their updates, but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key!
It's like they're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time.They're Shroedinger's computer company.
You can't tell if they suck or not until you open the box.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745</id>
	<title>DVORAK</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1246209420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century</i> </p><p>What I find to be "radical" is that we still insist on using the QWERTY layout when it is well-known to be inefficient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century What I find to be " radical " is that we still insist on using the QWERTY layout when it is well-known to be inefficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century What I find to be "radical" is that we still insist on using the QWERTY layout when it is well-known to be inefficient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</id>
	<title>NOBODY</title>
	<author>Bananatree3</author>
	<datestamp>1246206780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NOBODY, absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance, the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>NOBODY , absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance , the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NOBODY, absolutely NO one can improve on the IBM Model M. It is the absolute epitome of our technological renaissance, the baine of my roommate and simply the cats meow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511031</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1246307880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Making the "Delete" key larger isn't a bad idea. But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there, maybe they should make the "Control" and "Alt" keys larger as well...</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://carcino.gen.nz/images/image.phpi/348a0562/new\_microsoft\_keyboard.jpg?cb=1115204527" title="carcino.gen.nz">Already been done.</a> [carcino.gen.nz]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Making the " Delete " key larger is n't a bad idea .
But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there , maybe they should make the " Control " and " Alt " keys larger as well... Already been done .
[ carcino.gen.nz ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making the "Delete" key larger isn't a bad idea.
But since Windows is still the most widely used operating system out there, maybe they should make the "Control" and "Alt" keys larger as well... Already been done.
[carcino.gen.nz]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510619</id>
	<title>Re:Boffins?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246217340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you can't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Which standard English would that be? Let me guess: the US "standard"?</p><p>Y'all types in ma diel..dialll...diallecitect naow!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it , ...Which standard English would that be ?
Let me guess : the US " standard " ? Y'all types in ma diel..dialll...diallecitect naow !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't write in standard English so English speakers around the world can understand it, ...Which standard English would that be?
Let me guess: the US "standard"?Y'all types in ma diel..dialll...diallecitect naow!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517103</id>
	<title>Hi, Slow News Week?</title>
	<author>theillien</author>
	<datestamp>1246302960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have I got a story for you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have I got a story for you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have I got a story for you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509957</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>patro</author>
	<datestamp>1246211580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original function of Caps Lock is nuisance. If you are on Windows you can set Caps Lock to do an actually useful thing which makes your life a whole lot easier:</p><p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5278802/iswitchw-finds-windows-as-you-type" title="lifehacker.com">http://lifehacker.com/5278802/iswitchw-finds-windows-as-you-type</a> [lifehacker.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original function of Caps Lock is nuisance .
If you are on Windows you can set Caps Lock to do an actually useful thing which makes your life a whole lot easier : http : //lifehacker.com/5278802/iswitchw-finds-windows-as-you-type [ lifehacker.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original function of Caps Lock is nuisance.
If you are on Windows you can set Caps Lock to do an actually useful thing which makes your life a whole lot easier:http://lifehacker.com/5278802/iswitchw-finds-windows-as-you-type [lifehacker.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509495</id>
	<title>Just out of curiosity ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246207260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install larger Delete and Escape keys on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range. While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</i></p><p>So can someone provide a list of 19th-century keyboards (i.e., typewriters) that had Delete or Escape keys?</p><p>Inquiring minds want to know about this bit of history<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>(I've long wanted a bigger ESC key that's easier to hit, and I suppose most vi users would say the same thing.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install larger Delete and Escape keys on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range .
While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.So can someone provide a list of 19th-century keyboards ( i.e. , typewriters ) that had Delete or Escape keys ? Inquiring minds want to know about this bit of history ... ( I 've long wanted a bigger ESC key that 's easier to hit , and I suppose most vi users would say the same thing .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo boffins have decided the time is right to install larger Delete and Escape keys on their updated ThinkPad laptop T400s range.
While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.So can someone provide a list of 19th-century keyboards (i.e., typewriters) that had Delete or Escape keys?Inquiring minds want to know about this bit of history ...(I've long wanted a bigger ESC key that's easier to hit, and I suppose most vi users would say the same thing.
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510835</id>
	<title>Re:Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1246305960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering some people (not me) actually use capslock instead of shift (and claim to be faster with it), I imagine this would piss them off even more. (Apple has screwed with capslock before...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering some people ( not me ) actually use capslock instead of shift ( and claim to be faster with it ) , I imagine this would piss them off even more .
( Apple has screwed with capslock before... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering some people (not me) actually use capslock instead of shift (and claim to be faster with it), I imagine this would piss them off even more.
(Apple has screwed with capslock before...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28531971</id>
	<title>19th century...... yeeeah</title>
	<author>vuffi\_raa</author>
	<datestamp>1246388280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p></div><p>can someone tell me where the esc and del keys were on the 19th century typewriters? I seem to have missed them- how did they use the esc and del functions back then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.can someone tell me where the esc and del keys were on the 19th century typewriters ?
I seem to have missed them- how did they use the esc and del functions back then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.can someone tell me where the esc and del keys were on the 19th century typewriters?
I seem to have missed them- how did they use the esc and del functions back then?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510109</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246212960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use a text editor that has syntax highlighting so you won't have to write entire words in capitals, then you can avoid using caps lock. You'll probably say standards require you to write in capitals, but I don't really care, any standards that do so are obviously crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use a text editor that has syntax highlighting so you wo n't have to write entire words in capitals , then you can avoid using caps lock .
You 'll probably say standards require you to write in capitals , but I do n't really care , any standards that do so are obviously crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use a text editor that has syntax highlighting so you won't have to write entire words in capitals, then you can avoid using caps lock.
You'll probably say standards require you to write in capitals, but I don't really care, any standards that do so are obviously crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511541</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246271340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my keyboard only has one backspace key, yet it doesnt feel like there should be one on the other side in any way whatsoever. my keyboard has a ctrl next to 'a' and another some where on the right down the bottom. guess which one I've worn the text off and which one looks like a brand new key?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my keyboard only has one backspace key , yet it doesnt feel like there should be one on the other side in any way whatsoever .
my keyboard has a ctrl next to 'a ' and another some where on the right down the bottom .
guess which one I 've worn the text off and which one looks like a brand new key ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my keyboard only has one backspace key, yet it doesnt feel like there should be one on the other side in any way whatsoever.
my keyboard has a ctrl next to 'a' and another some where on the right down the bottom.
guess which one I've worn the text off and which one looks like a brand new key?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513643</id>
	<title>Re:Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1246288620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use caps lock daily. Never for typing, but to make tools "precise" in Photoshop. (Yes, I know I can set them to be precise all the time. No, I don't want to. I like the visual feedback of knowing instantly which tool I have. I just need "precise" mode every so often.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use caps lock daily .
Never for typing , but to make tools " precise " in Photoshop .
( Yes , I know I can set them to be precise all the time .
No , I do n't want to .
I like the visual feedback of knowing instantly which tool I have .
I just need " precise " mode every so often .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use caps lock daily.
Never for typing, but to make tools "precise" in Photoshop.
(Yes, I know I can set them to be precise all the time.
No, I don't want to.
I like the visual feedback of knowing instantly which tool I have.
I just need "precise" mode every so often.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512945</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Haxamanish</author>
	<datestamp>1246284000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I would like is "rotate left" and "rotate right" keys above the left and right cursor keys, which I use to strafe left and right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I would like is " rotate left " and " rotate right " keys above the left and right cursor keys , which I use to strafe left and right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I would like is "rotate left" and "rotate right" keys above the left and right cursor keys, which I use to strafe left and right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510151</id>
	<title>Nineteen Seventees/Eighties?</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1246213380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Numlock, arrow keys, Alt, Control, Windows/Apple, f1 - f12, page up, page down, scroll lock, insert, home, end, Fn... etc, etc</p><p>The statement about the 19th century is a load of shit. I remember a wide variety of keyboards from the 1980s. Slightly increasing the size of the escape and delete keys is nothing compared to, for example, adding a numpad or adding a green "copy" key. What about those ergonomic split keyboards? Surely that would be a larger change to the nineteenth century design than making a couple of easy to find keys a bit bigger.</p><p>The summary is stupid, an insult to our collective intelligence. There is no news here, no stuff that matters. It is simply slashvertising for Lenovo about something which really isn't all that interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Numlock , arrow keys , Alt , Control , Windows/Apple , f1 - f12 , page up , page down , scroll lock , insert , home , end , Fn... etc , etcThe statement about the 19th century is a load of shit .
I remember a wide variety of keyboards from the 1980s .
Slightly increasing the size of the escape and delete keys is nothing compared to , for example , adding a numpad or adding a green " copy " key .
What about those ergonomic split keyboards ?
Surely that would be a larger change to the nineteenth century design than making a couple of easy to find keys a bit bigger.The summary is stupid , an insult to our collective intelligence .
There is no news here , no stuff that matters .
It is simply slashvertising for Lenovo about something which really is n't all that interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Numlock, arrow keys, Alt, Control, Windows/Apple, f1 - f12, page up, page down, scroll lock, insert, home, end, Fn... etc, etcThe statement about the 19th century is a load of shit.
I remember a wide variety of keyboards from the 1980s.
Slightly increasing the size of the escape and delete keys is nothing compared to, for example, adding a numpad or adding a green "copy" key.
What about those ergonomic split keyboards?
Surely that would be a larger change to the nineteenth century design than making a couple of easy to find keys a bit bigger.The summary is stupid, an insult to our collective intelligence.
There is no news here, no stuff that matters.
It is simply slashvertising for Lenovo about something which really isn't all that interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</id>
	<title>Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>wonkavader</author>
	<datestamp>1246211640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good for Apple.</p><p>The solution is not to make the key bigger, it's to ditch it.</p><p>I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.</p><p>Do you use your scroll lock and break key?  Lose them, too.</p><p>How many function keys do you really need?  TWELVE?!?!</p><p>We should push way back to the original IBM selectric keyboard which was actually good for typing, and scrap everything that came with the IBM PC keyboard.</p><p>Old CP/M, Z-80 based Kaypros had a dynamite keyboard.</p><p>We still need to nix the caps lock key, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for Apple.The solution is not to make the key bigger , it 's to ditch it.I 'm all for getting rid of insert , delete , home , and end.Do you use your scroll lock and break key ?
Lose them , too.How many function keys do you really need ?
TWELVE ? ! ? ! We should push way back to the original IBM selectric keyboard which was actually good for typing , and scrap everything that came with the IBM PC keyboard.Old CP/M , Z-80 based Kaypros had a dynamite keyboard.We still need to nix the caps lock key , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for Apple.The solution is not to make the key bigger, it's to ditch it.I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.Do you use your scroll lock and break key?
Lose them, too.How many function keys do you really need?
TWELVE?!?!We should push way back to the original IBM selectric keyboard which was actually good for typing, and scrap everything that came with the IBM PC keyboard.Old CP/M, Z-80 based Kaypros had a dynamite keyboard.We still need to nix the caps lock key, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511009</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246307640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm with you on delete (direction arrow) making more sense than backspace, but I'm not with you on the idea that delete going forward doesn't make sense.  I think it's probably true that you more often want to delete left, but that also makes it pretty much the only character that operates right-to-left rather than left-to-right.  I think back-delete or delete-back or delete-left and then plain delete makes at least as much sense, if not more, than delete and delete (right arrow).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm with you on delete ( direction arrow ) making more sense than backspace , but I 'm not with you on the idea that delete going forward does n't make sense .
I think it 's probably true that you more often want to delete left , but that also makes it pretty much the only character that operates right-to-left rather than left-to-right .
I think back-delete or delete-back or delete-left and then plain delete makes at least as much sense , if not more , than delete and delete ( right arrow ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm with you on delete (direction arrow) making more sense than backspace, but I'm not with you on the idea that delete going forward doesn't make sense.
I think it's probably true that you more often want to delete left, but that also makes it pretty much the only character that operates right-to-left rather than left-to-right.
I think back-delete or delete-back or delete-left and then plain delete makes at least as much sense, if not more, than delete and delete (right arrow).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509661</id>
	<title>Apple must be scared</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246208580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has to be the biggest upgrade to PC usability since PC 97 added colour coding the mouse and keyboard connectors.  Well done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has to be the biggest upgrade to PC usability since PC 97 added colour coding the mouse and keyboard connectors .
Well done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has to be the biggest upgrade to PC usability since PC 97 added colour coding the mouse and keyboard connectors.
Well done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524575</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>ps2os2</author>
	<datestamp>1246299900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I *HATE* the num locks key. I have it turned off in the keyboard layout. I am sure there is a reason why it is there but I do not use it and disable the damn thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I * HATE * the num locks key .
I have it turned off in the keyboard layout .
I am sure there is a reason why it is there but I do not use it and disable the damn thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I *HATE* the num locks key.
I have it turned off in the keyboard layout.
I am sure there is a reason why it is there but I do not use it and disable the damn thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515527</id>
	<title>Righteous indignation fail.</title>
	<author>Hillgiant</author>
	<datestamp>1246297020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Needs more British slang.  Bonus points if it includes slang common to both US and UK dialects.  Double bonus points if it includes one or more "slip ups".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Needs more British slang .
Bonus points if it includes slang common to both US and UK dialects .
Double bonus points if it includes one or more " slip ups " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Needs more British slang.
Bonus points if it includes slang common to both US and UK dialects.
Double bonus points if it includes one or more "slip ups".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510353</id>
	<title>Re:Kill the delete key</title>
	<author>SL Baur</author>
	<datestamp>1246215180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.</p></div><p>Good God, man!  Where is my GOLD key?  I've been searching for it for years!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for getting rid of insert , delete , home , and end.Good God , man !
Where is my GOLD key ?
I 've been searching for it for years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for getting rid of insert, delete, home, and end.Good God, man!
Where is my GOLD key?
I've been searching for it for years!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512691</id>
	<title>Re:The Following keys also need to be altered Leno</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246282500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you said U twice, N, O, R, M</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you said U twice , N , O , R , M</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you said U twice, N, O, R, M</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514381</id>
	<title>Re:HERE'S AN IDEA</title>
	<author>ioshhdflwuegfh</author>
	<datestamp>1246292100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Get rid of the keyboard entirely. I'm fucking sick of it. Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet? Yes, I'm impatient.</p></div><p>Apple had done it already: <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/apple\_introduces\_revolutionary" title="theonion.com" rel="nofollow">Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Leyboard</a> [theonion.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get rid of the keyboard entirely .
I 'm fucking sick of it .
Why do n't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet ?
Yes , I 'm impatient.Apple had done it already : Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Leyboard [ theonion.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get rid of the keyboard entirely.
I'm fucking sick of it.
Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet?
Yes, I'm impatient.Apple had done it already: Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Leyboard [theonion.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511141</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>ILongForDarkness</author>
	<datestamp>1246266180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not just find the most popular button and make it the size of the keyboard? At least for me and my hands are fairly large, the escape key is far enough away from home row that I have to move my hand to reach it, after I move my hand I have to look at the keyboard (or feel around like I'm reading braile to feel the little bumps on the f and j keys) anyways, so I don't see how the bigger key is going to help.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just find the most popular button and make it the size of the keyboard ?
At least for me and my hands are fairly large , the escape key is far enough away from home row that I have to move my hand to reach it , after I move my hand I have to look at the keyboard ( or feel around like I 'm reading braile to feel the little bumps on the f and j keys ) anyways , so I do n't see how the bigger key is going to help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just find the most popular button and make it the size of the keyboard?
At least for me and my hands are fairly large, the escape key is far enough away from home row that I have to move my hand to reach it, after I move my hand I have to look at the keyboard (or feel around like I'm reading braile to feel the little bumps on the f and j keys) anyways, so I don't see how the bigger key is going to help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510161</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246213440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Not just that it's above the other keys, but that it's in a corner. Corner locations are the easiest for a user to locate in pretty much any UI, but with keyboards (and many other physical UIs) the time and effort to reach the corners is what keeps them from being where the most popular buttons are located.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately .
Not just that it 's above the other keys , but that it 's in a corner .
Corner locations are the easiest for a user to locate in pretty much any UI , but with keyboards ( and many other physical UIs ) the time and effort to reach the corners is what keeps them from being where the most popular buttons are located .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.
Not just that it's above the other keys, but that it's in a corner.
Corner locations are the easiest for a user to locate in pretty much any UI, but with keyboards (and many other physical UIs) the time and effort to reach the corners is what keeps them from being where the most popular buttons are located.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509685</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1246208820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So how's that iPhone treating ya?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how 's that iPhone treating ya ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how's that iPhone treating ya?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510469</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1246216320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm... I have a Lenovo (T30 or 40) that actually doesn't have a Windows key. You don't even know how much you miss it until it ain't there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm... I have a Lenovo ( T30 or 40 ) that actually does n't have a Windows key .
You do n't even know how much you miss it until it ai n't there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm... I have a Lenovo (T30 or 40) that actually doesn't have a Windows key.
You don't even know how much you miss it until it ain't there...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509601</id>
	<title>Re:Nineteenth Century</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1246208160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if people are modding you 'funny' because they don't <b>realize</b> that you're being informative?<br> <br>

Your point is right on, also.  If by '19th century' they meant 'second half of the 20th century', they would be closer to the truth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if people are modding you 'funny ' because they do n't realize that you 're being informative ?
Your point is right on , also .
If by '19th century ' they meant 'second half of the 20th century ' , they would be closer to the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if people are modding you 'funny' because they don't realize that you're being informative?
Your point is right on, also.
If by '19th century' they meant 'second half of the 20th century', they would be closer to the truth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28536219</id>
	<title>Re:Goldtouch Keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246363980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space. Both of these are great improvements.</p></div><p>Unless, of course, you have set up the Windows key to do something useful. Which most power users probably have.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space .
Both of these are great improvements.Unless , of course , you have set up the Windows key to do something useful .
Which most power users probably have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goldtouch moved the Windows and Right Click/Context Menu keys off of the main area into a separate space.
Both of these are great improvements.Unless, of course, you have set up the Windows key to do something useful.
Which most power users probably have.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512095</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1246276920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's great until some numbskull at Microsoft makes a keyboard without a proper insert key and you need to use the one on the number pad. I've had it happen. Using the num pad is also the only way to get the Home/End/PgUp/PgDown keys consistently positioned, also thanks to the same 'keyboard artists.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's great until some numbskull at Microsoft makes a keyboard without a proper insert key and you need to use the one on the number pad .
I 've had it happen .
Using the num pad is also the only way to get the Home/End/PgUp/PgDown keys consistently positioned , also thanks to the same 'keyboard artists .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's great until some numbskull at Microsoft makes a keyboard without a proper insert key and you need to use the one on the number pad.
I've had it happen.
Using the num pad is also the only way to get the Home/End/PgUp/PgDown keys consistently positioned, also thanks to the same 'keyboard artists.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510363</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246215300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. I've had the Logitech DiNovo Edge keyboard for a few months now, and I'm getting close to dumping it. I use the Home, End, Page Up, and Page Down keys frequently. It drives me nuts when my fingers are reaching for keys that aren't where they're supposed to be. And I rarely use the Delete key.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I 've had the Logitech DiNovo Edge keyboard for a few months now , and I 'm getting close to dumping it .
I use the Home , End , Page Up , and Page Down keys frequently .
It drives me nuts when my fingers are reaching for keys that are n't where they 're supposed to be .
And I rarely use the Delete key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I've had the Logitech DiNovo Edge keyboard for a few months now, and I'm getting close to dumping it.
I use the Home, End, Page Up, and Page Down keys frequently.
It drives me nuts when my fingers are reaching for keys that aren't where they're supposed to be.
And I rarely use the Delete key.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509813</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>jzhos</author>
	<datestamp>1246210080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if it is earlier than logitech,<p>

Microsoft natural multimedia keyboard <br>
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx?view=22&amp;pcid=e4eef44d-ef98-44d2-9451-abc336a4ec1b&amp;type=ovr" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx?view=22&amp;pcid=e4eef44d-ef98-44d2-9451-abc336a4ec1b&amp;type=ovr</a> [microsoft.com] <br>

Optical desktop 1000 <br>
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=058" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=058</a> [microsoft.com] <br>

Laser desktop 4000 <br>
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=094" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=094</a> [microsoft.com] <br>

<br>
They all have the said delete key change and separation of ESC key.
But people have been complaining about the change of delete key though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if it is earlier than logitech , Microsoft natural multimedia keyboard http : //www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx ? view = 22&amp;pcid = e4eef44d-ef98-44d2-9451-abc336a4ec1b&amp;type = ovr [ microsoft.com ] Optical desktop 1000 http : //www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx ? pid = 058 [ microsoft.com ] Laser desktop 4000 http : //www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx ? pid = 094 [ microsoft.com ] They all have the said delete key change and separation of ESC key .
But people have been complaining about the change of delete key though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if it is earlier than logitech,

Microsoft natural multimedia keyboard 
http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx?view=22&amp;pcid=e4eef44d-ef98-44d2-9451-abc336a4ec1b&amp;type=ovr [microsoft.com] 

Optical desktop 1000 
http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=058 [microsoft.com] 

Laser desktop 4000 
http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/mouseandkeyboard/ProductDetails.aspx?pid=094 [microsoft.com] 


They all have the said delete key change and separation of ESC key.
But people have been complaining about the change of delete key though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</id>
	<title>HERE'S AN IDEA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246205640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get rid of the keyboard entirely. I'm fucking sick of it.  Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet?  Yes, I'm impatient.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get rid of the keyboard entirely .
I 'm fucking sick of it .
Why do n't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet ?
Yes , I 'm impatient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get rid of the keyboard entirely.
I'm fucking sick of it.
Why don't we have shapeshifting touch screens yet?
Yes, I'm impatient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509367</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246206240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>typewriter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>typewriter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>typewriter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509615</id>
	<title>Ctrl-Alt-Del</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246208280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For Microsoft operating systems, the most common is Ctrl-Alt-Delete<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For Microsoft operating systems , the most common is Ctrl-Alt-Delete ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Microsoft operating systems, the most common is Ctrl-Alt-Delete ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511599</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246271880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just keep doing that and say hello to Repetitive Strain Injury...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just keep doing that and say hello to Repetitive Strain Injury.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just keep doing that and say hello to Repetitive Strain Injury...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1246213260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, nobody uses a computer for drafting. I can't see any reason to keep a key THAT I USE EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR HOURS ON END.</p><p>I <i>meant</i> to shout that last bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , nobody uses a computer for drafting .
I ca n't see any reason to keep a key THAT I USE EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR HOURS ON END.I meant to shout that last bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, nobody uses a computer for drafting.
I can't see any reason to keep a key THAT I USE EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR HOURS ON END.I meant to shout that last bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522903</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>k8to</author>
	<datestamp>1246285680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, because it would be impossible to request for your text to be capitalized ANY OTHER WAY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , because it would be impossible to request for your text to be capitalized ANY OTHER WAY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, because it would be impossible to request for your text to be capitalized ANY OTHER WAY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510125</id>
	<title>Re:HERE'S AN IDEA</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1246213140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replacement KB: $10<br>Replacement touch screen: $700</p><p>Any other questions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replacement KB : $ 10Replacement touch screen : $ 700Any other questions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replacement KB: $10Replacement touch screen: $700Any other questions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28521435</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246277460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen to that bro, keyboard layouts are sacred. I have a pile of brand spanking new keyboards I've bought thinking they had "standard" Qwerty layouts only to discover they've moved keys around (most were ordered online, and there was no high-res image of the layout). Damn I hate that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen to that bro , keyboard layouts are sacred .
I have a pile of brand spanking new keyboards I 've bought thinking they had " standard " Qwerty layouts only to discover they 've moved keys around ( most were ordered online , and there was no high-res image of the layout ) .
Damn I hate that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen to that bro, keyboard layouts are sacred.
I have a pile of brand spanking new keyboards I've bought thinking they had "standard" Qwerty layouts only to discover they've moved keys around (most were ordered online, and there was no high-res image of the layout).
Damn I hate that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</id>
	<title>Location, location, location</title>
	<author>neapolitan</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs, such as shrunken space bars and control keys, miniscule arrow keys, or nonstandard placement of arrow keys, etc.</p><p>However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.  I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement.  I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative.</p><p>For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.  Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am happy to see some thought go in to " routine " matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs , such as shrunken space bars and control keys , miniscule arrow keys , or nonstandard placement of arrow keys , etc.However , I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately .
I would venture to say the same for the delete key , which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement .
I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative.For my money , I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design .
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this -- too often I feel that laptop keyboards have abominable designs, such as shrunken space bars and control keys, miniscule arrow keys, or nonstandard placement of arrow keys, etc.However, I would say the esc enlargement on my Lenovo is unneeded -- its location above the other keys means it is struck accurately.
I would venture to say the same for the delete key, which I could locate with my eyes closed by its characteristic placement.
I think the aesthetics of the vertical extension of these keys is going to be negative.For my money, I wish they would just lay off the IBM keyboard design.
Thinkpads should not have a Windows key.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523363</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1246288560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As we've seen with some of the comments here, and as you noted, while many keys (like NumLock, ScrollLock, etc.) seem to be completely obsolete, they can't really be eliminated because they've been repurposed by newer software to do new things.  Changing the keyboard would suddenly require changing all that software that relies on those keys being there, unless that software can also be user-modified to use different hotkeys.</p><p>The only one which probably hasn't been repurposed is the CapsLock key, though that one is actually used occasionally.  I have to admit I use it sometimes, but I wish it was located someplace out of the way, like on the very top row perhaps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As we 've seen with some of the comments here , and as you noted , while many keys ( like NumLock , ScrollLock , etc .
) seem to be completely obsolete , they ca n't really be eliminated because they 've been repurposed by newer software to do new things .
Changing the keyboard would suddenly require changing all that software that relies on those keys being there , unless that software can also be user-modified to use different hotkeys.The only one which probably has n't been repurposed is the CapsLock key , though that one is actually used occasionally .
I have to admit I use it sometimes , but I wish it was located someplace out of the way , like on the very top row perhaps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we've seen with some of the comments here, and as you noted, while many keys (like NumLock, ScrollLock, etc.
) seem to be completely obsolete, they can't really be eliminated because they've been repurposed by newer software to do new things.
Changing the keyboard would suddenly require changing all that software that relies on those keys being there, unless that software can also be user-modified to use different hotkeys.The only one which probably hasn't been repurposed is the CapsLock key, though that one is actually used occasionally.
I have to admit I use it sometimes, but I wish it was located someplace out of the way, like on the very top row perhaps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510273</id>
	<title>Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Reports</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246214400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seit einigen Jahren wird das Gesch&#195;fft mit dem illegalen Welpenhandel unaufh&#195;frlich gr&#195;fsser, und damit steigt nat&#195;f&#194;&#188;rlich auch das Tierleid. Der Grund warum das Gesch&#195;fft so gut l&#195;fuft, ist vor allem mangelnde Aufkl&#195;frung, unwissende Hundek&#195;fufer, und Menschen die aus Mitleid kaufen. Welches Leid sie damit unterst&#195;f&#194;&#188;tzen wissen beim Kauf aber die wenigsten. Viele wollen Geld sparen und glauben einen Rassehund f&#195;f&#194;&#188;r sehr wenig Geld kaufen zu k&#195;fnnen. Andere sind schlicht nicht informiert wie ein seri&#195;fser Z&#195;f&#194;&#188;chter aussieht oder welchen Preis ein Rassehund normalerweise hat. Angeboten werden haupts&#195;fchlich kleine Modehunde wie Chihuahuas oder Franz&#195;fsische Bulldoggen aber auch Retriever und so ziemlich jede andere Rasse. Die meisten kommen aus L&#195;fndern in Osteuropa und haben schon sehr lange Fahrten in winzigen Boxen hinter sich, viele Hunde sind so geschw&#195;fcht das sie schon die Fahrt nicht &#195;f&#194;&#188;berstehen. Angeboten werden sie neben dem Internet auch auf Wochenm&#195;frkten oder direkt aus dem Auto heraus auf Autobahnrastpl&#195;ftzen. Die Welpen sind oft schwer krank, viele von ihnen erreichen trotz tier&#195;frztlicher Versorgung nicht mal das 1. Lebensjahr. Sie sind weder geimpft noch in irgendeiner Weise gesundheitlich untersucht worden. Die Elterntiere werden einfach wild und ohne Verstand miteinander verpaart und nicht auf Krankheiten untersucht. Ungeimpfte Welpen die nach Deutschland oder &#195;f-sterreich gebracht werden schleppen immer h&#195;fufiger gef&#195;fhrliche Krankheiten wie Parvovirose ein. Die Welpen wachsen unter sehr reizarmen und schlechten Bedingungen auf, eine gute Sozialisation ist so nicht m&#195;fglich. So lange es Menschen gibt die dort einen Welpen kaufen, sei es auch aus Mitleid, so lange werden diese H&#195;fndler ihre Hunde anbieten. Neben den H&#195;fndlern und Vermehrern gibt es aber auch noch Betr&#195;f&#194;&#188;ger vor denen man sich in acht nehmen sollte. Auch wenn der Betrug in den meisten F&#195;fllen mehr als offensichtlich ist, fallen immer noch t&#195;fglich gen&#195;f&#194;&#188;gend Leute auf diese Masche hinein. Vor allem in Online Tierm&#195;frkten bieten dubiose H&#195;fndler aus Kamerun billige Welpen an, die direkt bis vor die Haust&#195;f&#194;&#188;r geliefert werden sollen. Sp&#195;ftestens jetzt sollten die Alarmglocken l&#195;futen! Denn schon allein der Transport dieser Welpen per Schiff und Flugzeug w&#195;f&#194;&#188;rde den Kaufpreis WEIT &#195;f&#194;&#188;bersteigen. Der Welpe soll nach Deutschland transportiert werden, Abholung am Flughafen manchmal wird auch angeboten den Welpen bis vor die T&#195;f&#194;&#188;r zu bringen. Das Geld f&#195;f&#194;&#188;r den Welpen muss man im Voraus bezahlen, das Geld ist nat&#195;f&#194;&#188;rlich weg und einen Welpen gibt es auch nicht. Was macht einen guten Z&#195;f&#194;&#188;chter aus? Ein seri&#195;fser Z&#195;f&#194;&#188;chter: - z&#195;f&#194;&#188;chtet nur eine Rasse, allerh&#195;fchstens zwei - hat nur wenige Zuchttiere (1-2 H&#195;f&#194;&#188;ndinnen) - kann Sie ausreichend &#195;f&#194;&#188;ber die Eigenschaften und Besonderheiten &#195;zseiner&#195;oe Rasse informieren und steht ihnen auch nach dem Kauf mit Rat und Tat zur Seite <a href="http://www.zoopet.de/" title="zoopet.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoopet.de/</a> [zoopet.de] [zoopet.de] - versucht nicht Ihnen einen Welpen &#195;zaufzuschwatzen&#195;oe - erkundigt sich nach dem zuk&#195;f&#194;&#188;nftigen Lebensumst&#195;fnden des Welpen (Platz, Zeit usw.) - die H&#195;f&#194;&#188;ndin wirft h&#195;fchstens 1 mal im Jahr, es wird ihr genug Zeit gelassen sich zu erholen - die Zuchth&#195;f&#194;&#188;ndin wurde nicht vor der zweiten L&#195;fufigkeit gedeckt und ist nicht &#195;flter als 8 Jahre - Elterntiere wurden auf rassetypische Krankheiten untersucht und sind vollkommen gesund - die Welpen werden nicht vor der 8. Woche abgegeben - man kann die Mutterh&#195;f&#194;&#188;ndin mit ihren Welpen und andere beim Z&#195;f&#194;&#188;chter lebende Hun</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seit einigen Jahren wird das Gesch   fft mit dem illegalen Welpenhandel unaufh   frlich gr   fsser , und damit steigt nat   f     rlich auch das Tierleid .
Der Grund warum das Gesch   fft so gut l   fuft , ist vor allem mangelnde Aufkl   frung , unwissende Hundek   fufer , und Menschen die aus Mitleid kaufen .
Welches Leid sie damit unterst   f     tzen wissen beim Kauf aber die wenigsten .
Viele wollen Geld sparen und glauben einen Rassehund f   f     r sehr wenig Geld kaufen zu k   fnnen .
Andere sind schlicht nicht informiert wie ein seri   fser Z   f     chter aussieht oder welchen Preis ein Rassehund normalerweise hat .
Angeboten werden haupts   fchlich kleine Modehunde wie Chihuahuas oder Franz   fsische Bulldoggen aber auch Retriever und so ziemlich jede andere Rasse .
Die meisten kommen aus L   fndern in Osteuropa und haben schon sehr lange Fahrten in winzigen Boxen hinter sich , viele Hunde sind so geschw   fcht das sie schon die Fahrt nicht   f     berstehen .
Angeboten werden sie neben dem Internet auch auf Wochenm   frkten oder direkt aus dem Auto heraus auf Autobahnrastpl   ftzen .
Die Welpen sind oft schwer krank , viele von ihnen erreichen trotz tier   frztlicher Versorgung nicht mal das 1 .
Lebensjahr. Sie sind weder geimpft noch in irgendeiner Weise gesundheitlich untersucht worden .
Die Elterntiere werden einfach wild und ohne Verstand miteinander verpaart und nicht auf Krankheiten untersucht .
Ungeimpfte Welpen die nach Deutschland oder   f-sterreich gebracht werden schleppen immer h   fufiger gef   fhrliche Krankheiten wie Parvovirose ein .
Die Welpen wachsen unter sehr reizarmen und schlechten Bedingungen auf , eine gute Sozialisation ist so nicht m   fglich .
So lange es Menschen gibt die dort einen Welpen kaufen , sei es auch aus Mitleid , so lange werden diese H   fndler ihre Hunde anbieten .
Neben den H   fndlern und Vermehrern gibt es aber auch noch Betr   f     ger vor denen man sich in acht nehmen sollte .
Auch wenn der Betrug in den meisten F   fllen mehr als offensichtlich ist , fallen immer noch t   fglich gen   f     gend Leute auf diese Masche hinein .
Vor allem in Online Tierm   frkten bieten dubiose H   fndler aus Kamerun billige Welpen an , die direkt bis vor die Haust   f     r geliefert werden sollen .
Sp   ftestens jetzt sollten die Alarmglocken l   futen !
Denn schon allein der Transport dieser Welpen per Schiff und Flugzeug w   f     rde den Kaufpreis WEIT   f     bersteigen .
Der Welpe soll nach Deutschland transportiert werden , Abholung am Flughafen manchmal wird auch angeboten den Welpen bis vor die T   f     r zu bringen .
Das Geld f   f     r den Welpen muss man im Voraus bezahlen , das Geld ist nat   f     rlich weg und einen Welpen gibt es auch nicht .
Was macht einen guten Z   f     chter aus ?
Ein seri   fser Z   f     chter : - z   f     chtet nur eine Rasse , allerh   fchstens zwei - hat nur wenige Zuchttiere ( 1-2 H   f     ndinnen ) - kann Sie ausreichend   f     ber die Eigenschaften und Besonderheiten   zseiner   oe Rasse informieren und steht ihnen auch nach dem Kauf mit Rat und Tat zur Seite http : //www.zoopet.de/ [ zoopet.de ] [ zoopet.de ] - versucht nicht Ihnen einen Welpen   zaufzuschwatzen   oe - erkundigt sich nach dem zuk   f     nftigen Lebensumst   fnden des Welpen ( Platz , Zeit usw .
) - die H   f     ndin wirft h   fchstens 1 mal im Jahr , es wird ihr genug Zeit gelassen sich zu erholen - die Zuchth   f     ndin wurde nicht vor der zweiten L   fufigkeit gedeckt und ist nicht   flter als 8 Jahre - Elterntiere wurden auf rassetypische Krankheiten untersucht und sind vollkommen gesund - die Welpen werden nicht vor der 8 .
Woche abgegeben - man kann die Mutterh   f     ndin mit ihren Welpen und andere beim Z   f     chter lebende Hun</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seit einigen Jahren wird das GeschÃfft mit dem illegalen Welpenhandel unaufhÃfrlich grÃfsser, und damit steigt natÃfÂ¼rlich auch das Tierleid.
Der Grund warum das GeschÃfft so gut lÃfuft, ist vor allem mangelnde AufklÃfrung, unwissende HundekÃfufer, und Menschen die aus Mitleid kaufen.
Welches Leid sie damit unterstÃfÂ¼tzen wissen beim Kauf aber die wenigsten.
Viele wollen Geld sparen und glauben einen Rassehund fÃfÂ¼r sehr wenig Geld kaufen zu kÃfnnen.
Andere sind schlicht nicht informiert wie ein seriÃfser ZÃfÂ¼chter aussieht oder welchen Preis ein Rassehund normalerweise hat.
Angeboten werden hauptsÃfchlich kleine Modehunde wie Chihuahuas oder FranzÃfsische Bulldoggen aber auch Retriever und so ziemlich jede andere Rasse.
Die meisten kommen aus LÃfndern in Osteuropa und haben schon sehr lange Fahrten in winzigen Boxen hinter sich, viele Hunde sind so geschwÃfcht das sie schon die Fahrt nicht ÃfÂ¼berstehen.
Angeboten werden sie neben dem Internet auch auf WochenmÃfrkten oder direkt aus dem Auto heraus auf AutobahnrastplÃftzen.
Die Welpen sind oft schwer krank, viele von ihnen erreichen trotz tierÃfrztlicher Versorgung nicht mal das 1.
Lebensjahr. Sie sind weder geimpft noch in irgendeiner Weise gesundheitlich untersucht worden.
Die Elterntiere werden einfach wild und ohne Verstand miteinander verpaart und nicht auf Krankheiten untersucht.
Ungeimpfte Welpen die nach Deutschland oder Ãf-sterreich gebracht werden schleppen immer hÃfufiger gefÃfhrliche Krankheiten wie Parvovirose ein.
Die Welpen wachsen unter sehr reizarmen und schlechten Bedingungen auf, eine gute Sozialisation ist so nicht mÃfglich.
So lange es Menschen gibt die dort einen Welpen kaufen, sei es auch aus Mitleid, so lange werden diese HÃfndler ihre Hunde anbieten.
Neben den HÃfndlern und Vermehrern gibt es aber auch noch BetrÃfÂ¼ger vor denen man sich in acht nehmen sollte.
Auch wenn der Betrug in den meisten FÃfllen mehr als offensichtlich ist, fallen immer noch tÃfglich genÃfÂ¼gend Leute auf diese Masche hinein.
Vor allem in Online TiermÃfrkten bieten dubiose HÃfndler aus Kamerun billige Welpen an, die direkt bis vor die HaustÃfÂ¼r geliefert werden sollen.
SpÃftestens jetzt sollten die Alarmglocken lÃfuten!
Denn schon allein der Transport dieser Welpen per Schiff und Flugzeug wÃfÂ¼rde den Kaufpreis WEIT ÃfÂ¼bersteigen.
Der Welpe soll nach Deutschland transportiert werden, Abholung am Flughafen manchmal wird auch angeboten den Welpen bis vor die TÃfÂ¼r zu bringen.
Das Geld fÃfÂ¼r den Welpen muss man im Voraus bezahlen, das Geld ist natÃfÂ¼rlich weg und einen Welpen gibt es auch nicht.
Was macht einen guten ZÃfÂ¼chter aus?
Ein seriÃfser ZÃfÂ¼chter: - zÃfÂ¼chtet nur eine Rasse, allerhÃfchstens zwei - hat nur wenige Zuchttiere (1-2 HÃfÂ¼ndinnen) - kann Sie ausreichend ÃfÂ¼ber die Eigenschaften und Besonderheiten ÃzseinerÃoe Rasse informieren und steht ihnen auch nach dem Kauf mit Rat und Tat zur Seite http://www.zoopet.de/ [zoopet.de] [zoopet.de] - versucht nicht Ihnen einen Welpen ÃzaufzuschwatzenÃoe - erkundigt sich nach dem zukÃfÂ¼nftigen LebensumstÃfnden des Welpen (Platz, Zeit usw.
) - die HÃfÂ¼ndin wirft hÃfchstens 1 mal im Jahr, es wird ihr genug Zeit gelassen sich zu erholen - die ZuchthÃfÂ¼ndin wurde nicht vor der zweiten LÃfufigkeit gedeckt und ist nicht Ãflter als 8 Jahre - Elterntiere wurden auf rassetypische Krankheiten untersucht und sind vollkommen gesund - die Welpen werden nicht vor der 8.
Woche abgegeben - man kann die MutterhÃfÂ¼ndin mit ihren Welpen und andere beim ZÃfÂ¼chter lebende Hun</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510407</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>unity</author>
	<datestamp>1246215720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>"I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this"</i> </p><p>

I am too, another routine issue that Lenovo wins on is where the powercord plugs into their laptops. It still plugs into the back of the laptop.  That alone is reason to buy one.  It seems most of the laptop manufacturers have moved to having the plug on the left or right side which results in extra stress being put on the plug when it is actually used on your lap.  Give it about a year of nonstop use on the lap and that plug goes bad.  I for one will never buy a laptop with a plug on the left or right side again.  Like you said, "routine matters".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I am happy to see some thought go in to " routine " matters like this " I am too , another routine issue that Lenovo wins on is where the powercord plugs into their laptops .
It still plugs into the back of the laptop .
That alone is reason to buy one .
It seems most of the laptop manufacturers have moved to having the plug on the left or right side which results in extra stress being put on the plug when it is actually used on your lap .
Give it about a year of nonstop use on the lap and that plug goes bad .
I for one will never buy a laptop with a plug on the left or right side again .
Like you said , " routine matters " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "I am happy to see some thought go in to "routine" matters like this" 

I am too, another routine issue that Lenovo wins on is where the powercord plugs into their laptops.
It still plugs into the back of the laptop.
That alone is reason to buy one.
It seems most of the laptop manufacturers have moved to having the plug on the left or right side which results in extra stress being put on the plug when it is actually used on your lap.
Give it about a year of nonstop use on the lap and that plug goes bad.
I for one will never buy a laptop with a plug on the left or right side again.
Like you said, "routine matters".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509451</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1246207020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and you would send your Courier to deliver messages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and you would send your Courier to deliver messages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and you would send your Courier to deliver messages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511855</id>
	<title>Re:NOBODY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246274340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're so in love with it, maybe you should shove it up your ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're so in love with it , maybe you should shove it up your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're so in love with it, maybe you should shove it up your ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510817</id>
	<title>Re:Location, location, location</title>
	<author>Baloo Uriza</author>
	<datestamp>1246305720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My T400 has a "Super" and a "Compose Character" key, but for some reason, they're mislabelled with a wavy thing and something that looks like a ladder.  I dunno what's wrong with yours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My T400 has a " Super " and a " Compose Character " key , but for some reason , they 're mislabelled with a wavy thing and something that looks like a ladder .
I dunno what 's wrong with yours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My T400 has a "Super" and a "Compose Character" key, but for some reason, they're mislabelled with a wavy thing and something that looks like a ladder.
I dunno what's wrong with yours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833</id>
	<title>Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1246210320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't care much about the Delete and Escape key changes mentioned in TFA... but I think the article's author gives a glimpse of tech-naivete' by suggesting that the Caps Lock key is obsolete.  Just because he doesn't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world doesn't mean the key isn't highly useful to application developers.  I'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example.  <br> <br>DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his<br>/<br>COMMIT</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care much about the Delete and Escape key changes mentioned in TFA... but I think the article 's author gives a glimpse of tech-naivete ' by suggesting that the Caps Lock key is obsolete .
Just because he does n't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world does n't mean the key is n't highly useful to application developers .
I 'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example .
DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his/COMMIT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care much about the Delete and Escape key changes mentioned in TFA... but I think the article's author gives a glimpse of tech-naivete' by suggesting that the Caps Lock key is obsolete.
Just because he doesn't see a reason for Caps Lock out there in his little business world doesn't mean the key isn't highly useful to application developers.
I'll point out SQL capitalization standards as just one example.
DELETE FROM my.memory WHERE opinion = his/COMMIT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511779</id>
	<title>Re:Nineteenth Century</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246273680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys, idiot.</p></div><p>I can't show you because I can't find any on the 'net. But at least some 19th century hot metal typesetters had a mechanism to remove the last glyph and/or the last line. I think that counts as an Delete key and maybe even an Esc key.</p><p>Anyone else used the Norsk Data keyboards, or similar, where the delete key deletes right until you reach the end of line, then it starts deleting left? Really annoying on a system with many users and a lag between input and result.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys , idiot.I ca n't show you because I ca n't find any on the 'net .
But at least some 19th century hot metal typesetters had a mechanism to remove the last glyph and/or the last line .
I think that counts as an Delete key and maybe even an Esc key.Anyone else used the Norsk Data keyboards , or similar , where the delete key deletes right until you reach the end of line , then it starts deleting left ?
Really annoying on a system with many users and a lag between input and result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Show me a keyboard that even HAD the Delete or Escape keys, idiot.I can't show you because I can't find any on the 'net.
But at least some 19th century hot metal typesetters had a mechanism to remove the last glyph and/or the last line.
I think that counts as an Delete key and maybe even an Esc key.Anyone else used the Norsk Data keyboards, or similar, where the delete key deletes right until you reach the end of line, then it starts deleting left?
Really annoying on a system with many users and a lag between input and result.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513111</id>
	<title>Lusers confuse delete with backspace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246284960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't sound like a good idea.  The lusers I see confuse delete with backspace and ending up erasing what they didn't intend.  This will only make matters worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't sound like a good idea .
The lusers I see confuse delete with backspace and ending up erasing what they did n't intend .
This will only make matters worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't sound like a good idea.
The lusers I see confuse delete with backspace and ending up erasing what they didn't intend.
This will only make matters worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510339</id>
	<title>Re:Just out of curiosity ...</title>
	<author>incubuz1980</author>
	<datestamp>1246215120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Lenovo x61s has the ESC right above F1. When I first got my x61s kept hitting F1 instead. In the end I just xmodmapped my F1 to ESC. Problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Lenovo x61s has the ESC right above F1 .
When I first got my x61s kept hitting F1 instead .
In the end I just xmodmapped my F1 to ESC .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Lenovo x61s has the ESC right above F1.
When I first got my x61s kept hitting F1 instead.
In the end I just xmodmapped my F1 to ESC.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509495</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567</id>
	<title>The Following keys also need to be altered Lenovo</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1246207980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a better idea Lenovo : enlarge the : U , O , Y , K , C , U , F keys .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a better idea Lenovo: enlarge the: U, O, Y, K, C, U, F keys.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523327</id>
	<title>Re:KeyTronic</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1246288440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have piles of those at work.  They aren't bad keyboards, have a decent feel to them, and are comfortable to use, though I don't like the small backspace/large enter key thing.  But set one next to a Model M and it just looks and feels like a cheap imitation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have piles of those at work .
They are n't bad keyboards , have a decent feel to them , and are comfortable to use , though I do n't like the small backspace/large enter key thing .
But set one next to a Model M and it just looks and feels like a cheap imitation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have piles of those at work.
They aren't bad keyboards, have a decent feel to them, and are comfortable to use, though I don't like the small backspace/large enter key thing.
But set one next to a Model M and it just looks and feels like a cheap imitation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511537</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1246271280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, someone doesn't know their history.  The reason Windows uses control-C for copy is that Macs used Command-C and UNIX systems used Meta-C (using control on a UNIX system is stupid, because it means it won't work in a terminal or an xterm, where control is used for sending escape sequences).  The PC keyboard had neither command nor meta keys, so this wasn't possible.  Note that this shortcut is a relatively recent thing on Windows.  DOS programs conventionally used control-insert/shift-insert for copy and paste.  Windows changed this to be more familiar to users of other systems, but was hampered by limitations of the target platform.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , someone does n't know their history .
The reason Windows uses control-C for copy is that Macs used Command-C and UNIX systems used Meta-C ( using control on a UNIX system is stupid , because it means it wo n't work in a terminal or an xterm , where control is used for sending escape sequences ) .
The PC keyboard had neither command nor meta keys , so this was n't possible .
Note that this shortcut is a relatively recent thing on Windows .
DOS programs conventionally used control-insert/shift-insert for copy and paste .
Windows changed this to be more familiar to users of other systems , but was hampered by limitations of the target platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, someone doesn't know their history.
The reason Windows uses control-C for copy is that Macs used Command-C and UNIX systems used Meta-C (using control on a UNIX system is stupid, because it means it won't work in a terminal or an xterm, where control is used for sending escape sequences).
The PC keyboard had neither command nor meta keys, so this wasn't possible.
Note that this shortcut is a relatively recent thing on Windows.
DOS programs conventionally used control-insert/shift-insert for copy and paste.
Windows changed this to be more familiar to users of other systems, but was hampered by limitations of the target platform.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511795</id>
	<title>Exactly.</title>
	<author>Zalminen</author>
	<datestamp>1246273740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's terribly annoying when a keyboard decides to place something else in the top-left corner. <br> <br>

My previous keyboard had a sleep button in that location. More than once I was playing some game, tried to hit Esc quickly without looking and ended up cursing when the computer entered sleep mode...
At least it was configurable so I could then disable it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's terribly annoying when a keyboard decides to place something else in the top-left corner .
My previous keyboard had a sleep button in that location .
More than once I was playing some game , tried to hit Esc quickly without looking and ended up cursing when the computer entered sleep mode.. . At least it was configurable so I could then disable it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's terribly annoying when a keyboard decides to place something else in the top-left corner.
My previous keyboard had a sleep button in that location.
More than once I was playing some game, tried to hit Esc quickly without looking and ended up cursing when the computer entered sleep mode...
At least it was configurable so I could then disable it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510147</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513649</id>
	<title>The function key</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1246288680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a old R31 that I use for browsing and remote desktop. The fn key in the lower left hand corner drives me nuts because I hit it when I try to use ctrl. They eventually fixed it. The T500 at work have the fn and ctrl key flipped the right way. I don't know how much testing they do or if they just work off of customer complaints.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a old R31 that I use for browsing and remote desktop .
The fn key in the lower left hand corner drives me nuts because I hit it when I try to use ctrl .
They eventually fixed it .
The T500 at work have the fn and ctrl key flipped the right way .
I do n't know how much testing they do or if they just work off of customer complaints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a old R31 that I use for browsing and remote desktop.
The fn key in the lower left hand corner drives me nuts because I hit it when I try to use ctrl.
They eventually fixed it.
The T500 at work have the fn and ctrl key flipped the right way.
I don't know how much testing they do or if they just work off of customer complaints.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514945</id>
	<title>Re:Apple losing a golden chance</title>
	<author>Trillan</author>
	<datestamp>1246294620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple has already put <a href="http://rentzsch.com/notes/applesantiCAPSLOCK" title="rentzsch.com">capslock protection</a> [rentzsch.com] into their keyboards. It works really well in practice, I haven't accidentally engaged the capslock since I got this on a keyboard in 2008.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has already put capslock protection [ rentzsch.com ] into their keyboards .
It works really well in practice , I have n't accidentally engaged the capslock since I got this on a keyboard in 2008 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has already put capslock protection [rentzsch.com] into their keyboards.
It works really well in practice, I haven't accidentally engaged the capslock since I got this on a keyboard in 2008.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28518499</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246308660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No. It shoud be, <a href="http://www.neo-layout.org/" title="neo-layout.org">and here actually is</a> [neo-layout.org], MOD3. (Hover over the "Ebene 1-6" buttons, to see more.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
It shoud be , and here actually is [ neo-layout.org ] , MOD3 .
( Hover over the " Ebene 1-6 " buttons , to see more .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
It shoud be, and here actually is [neo-layout.org], MOD3.
(Hover over the "Ebene 1-6" buttons, to see more.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515833</id>
	<title>Re:Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've learned to appreciate it's function, home/end being horizontally oriented, with pgUp/pgDn being vertical.  Its just that, the latter always <i>was</i> vertical; and the latter doesn't need to be.  I know what it does.  Further more, a part of me still remembers the large "L" shaped and vertically oriented return keys.  So when reaching for delete, the over sized button under my right pinky always feels like a return button at first touch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've learned to appreciate it 's function , home/end being horizontally oriented , with pgUp/pgDn being vertical .
Its just that , the latter always was vertical ; and the latter does n't need to be .
I know what it does .
Further more , a part of me still remembers the large " L " shaped and vertically oriented return keys .
So when reaching for delete , the over sized button under my right pinky always feels like a return button at first touch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've learned to appreciate it's function, home/end being horizontally oriented, with pgUp/pgDn being vertical.
Its just that, the latter always was vertical; and the latter doesn't need to be.
I know what it does.
Further more, a part of me still remembers the large "L" shaped and vertically oriented return keys.
So when reaching for delete, the over sized button under my right pinky always feels like a return button at first touch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395</id>
	<title>Lenovo aren't the only ones</title>
	<author>name*censored*</author>
	<datestamp>1246206540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure I'm not the only person on slashdot to own this <a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/keyboards/keyboard/devices/3071&amp;cl=US,EN" title="logitech.com">fine keyboard</a> [logitech.com], with it's double-sized delete key. Although, the escape key is standard sized.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure I 'm not the only person on slashdot to own this fine keyboard [ logitech.com ] , with it 's double-sized delete key .
Although , the escape key is standard sized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure I'm not the only person on slashdot to own this fine keyboard [logitech.com], with it's double-sized delete key.
Although, the escape key is standard sized.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510291</id>
	<title>Re:DVORAK</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1246214520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.xkcd.com/561/" title="xkcd.com">Uncomfortable Truth</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uncomfortable Truth [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uncomfortable Truth [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512535</id>
	<title>Delete on a typewriter?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1246281120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware<br>&gt; which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.</p><p>Amazing.  All those years using whiteout on typewriters when I could have been using the delete key that I didn't know was there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; While it is a small change , it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware &gt; which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Amazing .
All those years using whiteout on typewriters when I could have been using the delete key that I did n't know was there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; While it is a small change, it is fairly radical to tinker with an area of hardware&gt; which has been largely unchanged since the 19th century.Amazing.
All those years using whiteout on typewriters when I could have been using the delete key that I didn't know was there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>ThePromenader</author>
	<datestamp>1246213500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and since the ctrl-alt-delete keys are so often used in Windows PC's, why don't they regroup them to their own region of the keyboard? In fact, why not combine them into a unique oversized (and possibly bright red) "panic button"? But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits; not the failings of the operating system they control.</p><p>Key size is not the only pre-90's "tradition" that has to go - the "num lock" key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades - mac recognised this trait quite early in the game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and since the ctrl-alt-delete keys are so often used in Windows PC 's , why do n't they regroup them to their own region of the keyboard ?
In fact , why not combine them into a unique oversized ( and possibly bright red ) " panic button " ?
But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits ; not the failings of the operating system they control.Key size is not the only pre-90 's " tradition " that has to go - the " num lock " key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades - mac recognised this trait quite early in the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and since the ctrl-alt-delete keys are so often used in Windows PC's, why don't they regroup them to their own region of the keyboard?
In fact, why not combine them into a unique oversized (and possibly bright red) "panic button"?
But I digress... keyboards should reflect progressive user habits; not the failings of the operating system they control.Key size is not the only pre-90's "tradition" that has to go - the "num lock" key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades - mac recognised this trait quite early in the game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515485</id>
	<title>Now there's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246296840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We obviously need a "frist psot!1" key. Why haven't we thought of this before?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We obviously need a " frist psot ! 1 " key .
Why have n't we thought of this before ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We obviously need a "frist psot!1" key.
Why haven't we thought of this before?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509447</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509349</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Rock Chalk Jayhawk</author>
	<datestamp>1246206060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Typewriters were invented during the 19th century.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typewriters were invented during the 19th century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typewriters were invented during the 19th century.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510515</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Zontar The Mindless</author>
	<datestamp>1246216560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the "num lock" key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades...</p></div><p>Do you even know what NumLock is for? It's to allow you to toggle your numeric keypad between numbers and positioning keys (arrows, PgUp, etc.).</p><p>As the user of a laptop with a numeric keypad (one of the reasons I bought the unit), I happen to find NumLock extremely useful. If you really don't care for its presence on your keyboard, I'll be happy to loan you a pair of pliers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the " num lock " key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades...Do you even know what NumLock is for ?
It 's to allow you to toggle your numeric keypad between numbers and positioning keys ( arrows , PgUp , etc .
) .As the user of a laptop with a numeric keypad ( one of the reasons I bought the unit ) , I happen to find NumLock extremely useful .
If you really do n't care for its presence on your keyboard , I 'll be happy to loan you a pair of pliers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...the "num lock" key is rather pointless for most desktop users - the numeric pad has been an integrated part of most all desktop keyboards since decades...Do you even know what NumLock is for?
It's to allow you to toggle your numeric keypad between numbers and positioning keys (arrows, PgUp, etc.
).As the user of a laptop with a numeric keypad (one of the reasons I bought the unit), I happen to find NumLock extremely useful.
If you really don't care for its presence on your keyboard, I'll be happy to loan you a pair of pliers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512153</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Rich Klein</author>
	<datestamp>1246277400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CAPS LOCK is handy for typing things such as CTRL[1].  It's also very handy when working in CAD, where all-caps is usually expected.</p><p>The delete key on the (Apple) keyboard in front of me is already nearly as big as the enter key; does it really need to be bigger?  And while I do use the escape key with some frequency, I don't have any problems with missing it or hitting adjacent keys, so why does it need to be bigger?</p><p>Finally, I thought I'd comment directly to the PC Authority article.  It says you need to login or register to comment, so I registered and logged in.  The top bar on the site said I was logged in, but below the article it continued to tell me to login or register in order to comment.  I just wanted to share my annoyance with that.</p><p>[1] Which is why I'm replying to this, instead of starting a new thread.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CAPS LOCK is handy for typing things such as CTRL [ 1 ] .
It 's also very handy when working in CAD , where all-caps is usually expected.The delete key on the ( Apple ) keyboard in front of me is already nearly as big as the enter key ; does it really need to be bigger ?
And while I do use the escape key with some frequency , I do n't have any problems with missing it or hitting adjacent keys , so why does it need to be bigger ? Finally , I thought I 'd comment directly to the PC Authority article .
It says you need to login or register to comment , so I registered and logged in .
The top bar on the site said I was logged in , but below the article it continued to tell me to login or register in order to comment .
I just wanted to share my annoyance with that .
[ 1 ] Which is why I 'm replying to this , instead of starting a new thread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CAPS LOCK is handy for typing things such as CTRL[1].
It's also very handy when working in CAD, where all-caps is usually expected.The delete key on the (Apple) keyboard in front of me is already nearly as big as the enter key; does it really need to be bigger?
And while I do use the escape key with some frequency, I don't have any problems with missing it or hitting adjacent keys, so why does it need to be bigger?Finally, I thought I'd comment directly to the PC Authority article.
It says you need to login or register to comment, so I registered and logged in.
The top bar on the site said I was logged in, but below the article it continued to tell me to login or register in order to comment.
I just wanted to share my annoyance with that.
[1] Which is why I'm replying to this, instead of starting a new thread.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331</id>
	<title>So conflicted...</title>
	<author>XnavxeMiyyep</author>
	<datestamp>1246205940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lenovo has adware in their updates, but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key! It's like they're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenovo has adware in their updates , but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key !
It 's like they 're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenovo has adware in their updates, but they might sell a laptop without a caps lock key!
It's like they're simultaneously the worst and best computer company at the same time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524493</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>ps2os2</author>
	<datestamp>1246298940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or even better delete OS key.<br>That would help out users a lot more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even better delete OS key.That would help out users a lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even better delete OS key.That would help out users a lot more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512061</id>
	<title>The really real problem: no use of the thumbs</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1246276620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key.</p></div><p>Really?  It's <em>never</em> a problem for me.</p><p>I think the really really real problems of keyboards are:</p><ul><li>Very little use of the thumbs: my thumbs operate the space key.  Maybe the Alt keys.  That's about 0.5 or 1.5 keys per finger.  Meanwhile, my index fingers handle "4 5 p y u i k x" and "6 7 f g d h b m" (I use the Dvorak layout) for a whopping 8 keys per finger.</li><li>The arrow keys are far away from the home row (i.e. "asdf jkl;"), meaning you have to move far to get there, which takes time.  Move the arrow and cursor control keys under the thumbs.</li><li>With software, we could make it easier to type the same letter twice (as in the "tt" in letter): introduce a new key, placed on both sides of the board (kinda' like shift/alt/ctrl) which repeats the last key.  That way, you can alternate between not just fingers but (friggin') hands while repeating the same key.</li><li>Keyboards aren't designed to fit the anatomy of human hands.  Note how your pinky is about two-thirds (or maybe 70\%) the length of your middle finger.  Are the keys on your keyboard correspondingly closer to or further away from your hands?</li><li>Put away your laptop, and let your hands rest on the table in a natural position.  Measure the distance between your index fingers.  Next, measure the distance between "f" and "j" on your keyboard.  Is it smaller?  Much smaller?  Incredibly much much smaller?</li></ul><p>The Kinesis Ergo Elan keyboard fixes some of this.  Do yourself a big favor and get one.</p><p>(I'm not a paid shill, but a <em>very</em> happy customer.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key.Really ?
It 's never a problem for me.I think the really really real problems of keyboards are : Very little use of the thumbs : my thumbs operate the space key .
Maybe the Alt keys .
That 's about 0.5 or 1.5 keys per finger .
Meanwhile , my index fingers handle " 4 5 p y u i k x " and " 6 7 f g d h b m " ( I use the Dvorak layout ) for a whopping 8 keys per finger.The arrow keys are far away from the home row ( i.e .
" asdf jkl ; " ) , meaning you have to move far to get there , which takes time .
Move the arrow and cursor control keys under the thumbs.With software , we could make it easier to type the same letter twice ( as in the " tt " in letter ) : introduce a new key , placed on both sides of the board ( kinda ' like shift/alt/ctrl ) which repeats the last key .
That way , you can alternate between not just fingers but ( friggin ' ) hands while repeating the same key.Keyboards are n't designed to fit the anatomy of human hands .
Note how your pinky is about two-thirds ( or maybe 70 \ % ) the length of your middle finger .
Are the keys on your keyboard correspondingly closer to or further away from your hands ? Put away your laptop , and let your hands rest on the table in a natural position .
Measure the distance between your index fingers .
Next , measure the distance between " f " and " j " on your keyboard .
Is it smaller ?
Much smaller ?
Incredibly much much smaller ? The Kinesis Ergo Elan keyboard fixes some of this .
Do yourself a big favor and get one .
( I 'm not a paid shill , but a very happy customer .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the real problem with keyboards is the NumLock key.Really?
It's never a problem for me.I think the really really real problems of keyboards are:Very little use of the thumbs: my thumbs operate the space key.
Maybe the Alt keys.
That's about 0.5 or 1.5 keys per finger.
Meanwhile, my index fingers handle "4 5 p y u i k x" and "6 7 f g d h b m" (I use the Dvorak layout) for a whopping 8 keys per finger.The arrow keys are far away from the home row (i.e.
"asdf jkl;"), meaning you have to move far to get there, which takes time.
Move the arrow and cursor control keys under the thumbs.With software, we could make it easier to type the same letter twice (as in the "tt" in letter): introduce a new key, placed on both sides of the board (kinda' like shift/alt/ctrl) which repeats the last key.
That way, you can alternate between not just fingers but (friggin') hands while repeating the same key.Keyboards aren't designed to fit the anatomy of human hands.
Note how your pinky is about two-thirds (or maybe 70\%) the length of your middle finger.
Are the keys on your keyboard correspondingly closer to or further away from your hands?Put away your laptop, and let your hands rest on the table in a natural position.
Measure the distance between your index fingers.
Next, measure the distance between "f" and "j" on your keyboard.
Is it smaller?
Much smaller?
Incredibly much much smaller?The Kinesis Ergo Elan keyboard fixes some of this.
Do yourself a big favor and get one.
(I'm not a paid shill, but a very happy customer.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509447</id>
	<title>Marketing Gimmicks &amp; Flawed Analyses</title>
	<author>xixax</author>
	<datestamp>1246206960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So let me get this straight.</p><p>The best way to improve keying accuracy is to create even more derivative keyboard layouts?</p><p>I'd guess the del key might even afford to be *smaller* as it is used more often and hence more easily remembered.</p><p>I would have had a bit more sympathy if the article had said they'd placed it in a more accessible location ala space bar (rather than off to one side of the main keymap).</p><p>Maybe they could create a "Lenovo" key to sit between the "Windows" key and a new "Dave was here!" key. Then I can loan them my 16 button hexdecimal mouse[1].</p><p>Xix.<br>[1] Otherwise known as a digitizing puck</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this straight.The best way to improve keying accuracy is to create even more derivative keyboard layouts ? I 'd guess the del key might even afford to be * smaller * as it is used more often and hence more easily remembered.I would have had a bit more sympathy if the article had said they 'd placed it in a more accessible location ala space bar ( rather than off to one side of the main keymap ) .Maybe they could create a " Lenovo " key to sit between the " Windows " key and a new " Dave was here !
" key .
Then I can loan them my 16 button hexdecimal mouse [ 1 ] .Xix .
[ 1 ] Otherwise known as a digitizing puck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this straight.The best way to improve keying accuracy is to create even more derivative keyboard layouts?I'd guess the del key might even afford to be *smaller* as it is used more often and hence more easily remembered.I would have had a bit more sympathy if the article had said they'd placed it in a more accessible location ala space bar (rather than off to one side of the main keymap).Maybe they could create a "Lenovo" key to sit between the "Windows" key and a new "Dave was here!
" key.
Then I can loan them my 16 button hexdecimal mouse[1].Xix.
[1] Otherwise known as a digitizing puck</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511475</id>
	<title>Change the keys, whatever....</title>
	<author>idiotnot</author>
	<datestamp>1246270800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, god, please don't destroy any more wonderful <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Extended\_Keyboard" title="wikipedia.org">Apple Extended Keyboards</a> [wikipedia.org] to make ominous story photos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , god , please do n't destroy any more wonderful Apple Extended Keyboards [ wikipedia.org ] to make ominous story photos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, god, please don't destroy any more wonderful Apple Extended Keyboards [wikipedia.org] to make ominous story photos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519141</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1246267740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The vt-52 placed the caps lock and control keys side by side, as did some of the later <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/vt320-keyboard.jpg" title="columbia.edu">DEC Terminals</a> [columbia.edu].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The vt-52 placed the caps lock and control keys side by side , as did some of the later DEC Terminals [ columbia.edu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The vt-52 placed the caps lock and control keys side by side, as did some of the later DEC Terminals [columbia.edu].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309</id>
	<title>Caps lock will be the end of unintended shouting</title>
	<author>Vandil X</author>
	<datestamp>1246205820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and , more importantly , reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and, more importantly, reduce calls during your off hours because a user locked out his/her account due to CAPS LOCK being on when entering a password.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509839</id>
	<title>Re:No need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246210380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right.  It's backspace or die^H^H^Hnothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right .
It 's backspace or die ^ H ^ H ^ Hnothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right.
It's backspace or die^H^H^Hnothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246212720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'm a senior software developer at a LAMP shop; i write a lot of SQL for ad-hoc queries and what-not.  i capitalize SQL queries, even in my ad-hoc queries (it's a good habit to get into if only for readability), but i don't ever use the caps lock key.  it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key (which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key.  i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.</p><p>so, your example fails to convince.</p><p>the only reason i can see for keeping the caps lock key is for old and/or braindead systems that don't speak anything but uppercase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm a senior software developer at a LAMP shop ; i write a lot of SQL for ad-hoc queries and what-not .
i capitalize SQL queries , even in my ad-hoc queries ( it 's a good habit to get into if only for readability ) , but i do n't ever use the caps lock key .
it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key ( which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key ) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key .
i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.so , your example fails to convince.the only reason i can see for keeping the caps lock key is for old and/or braindead systems that do n't speak anything but uppercase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'm a senior software developer at a LAMP shop; i write a lot of SQL for ad-hoc queries and what-not.
i capitalize SQL queries, even in my ad-hoc queries (it's a good habit to get into if only for readability), but i don't ever use the caps lock key.
it is more efficient for me to hold down the shift key (which is closer to my pinky than the caps lock key) while continuing to type at the same pace than it is to stop and press and release the caps lock key.
i suspect this is likely the case with most people who are able to type at any reasonable pace.so, your example fails to convince.the only reason i can see for keeping the caps lock key is for old and/or braindead systems that don't speak anything but uppercase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510693</id>
	<title>Re:Caps Lock Idea...</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1246218060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SHIFT instead of CAPS faster? That's certainly not true for me. I use it for Java constants. You can change the caps using the "clean" command within Eclipse, but I would rather have my text correctly formatted right away. Sometimes I type Java or pseudo code in normal text editors as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SHIFT instead of CAPS faster ?
That 's certainly not true for me .
I use it for Java constants .
You can change the caps using the " clean " command within Eclipse , but I would rather have my text correctly formatted right away .
Sometimes I type Java or pseudo code in normal text editors as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SHIFT instead of CAPS faster?
That's certainly not true for me.
I use it for Java constants.
You can change the caps using the "clean" command within Eclipse, but I would rather have my text correctly formatted right away.
Sometimes I type Java or pseudo code in normal text editors as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510867</id>
	<title>Re:Caps lock will be the end of unintended shoutin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because you use CTRL a lot more than CAPS and it strains your pinky a lot less if they switch places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because you use CTRL a lot more than CAPS and it strains your pinky a lot less if they switch places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because you use CTRL a lot more than CAPS and it strains your pinky a lot less if they switch places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_145</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28525049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_142</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_140</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28536219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_144</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_139</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28518499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_141</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_146</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28521435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512651
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_143</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_29_0118227_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509445
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510873
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513045
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511031
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510643
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514329
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510913
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511507
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511537
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524493
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510167
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512387
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510811
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511361
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512095
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510515
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513207
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524047
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523363
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512753
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510419
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524575
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512909
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514271
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512945
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514213
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509995
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514165
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510693
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514979
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516287
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511599
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512957
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512651
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511963
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516789
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510699
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510323
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509795
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512049
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514999
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509337
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28518499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28516151
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510829
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509623
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509733
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509651
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512061
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511811
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513809
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510831
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510031
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510179
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510867
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510685
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511541
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509915
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519141
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511427
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513321
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509431
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510519
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509661
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28536219
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509737
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509985
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509949
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511009
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509967
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510113
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510353
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510127
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512393
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28522765
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28519683
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511871
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510371
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510195
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28524283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510469
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510025
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28523327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28513659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28525049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28514381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28511517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_29_0118227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509789
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28517987
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28510363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28512197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28515833
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28521435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_29_0118227.28509993
</commentlist>
</conversation>
