<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_28_2123204</id>
	<title>Desktop As a Cellphone Extension?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246182000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>spaceman375 writes <i>"Like many slashdotters, I've given up on landlines and have only a cell account. The problem: when I am home I don't want to carry my phone on my person, AND I don't want to have to run (possibly up or down stairs) to answer a call. Landlines solved this with extensions. I could go buy an <a href="http://www.xlink.com/">xlink</a> or other Bluetooth-to-POTS solution, but that takes money for equipment. My desktop has Bluetooth, as do my laptop and cell. All I want is a program that can use my cell's Bluetooth to make and receive calls from my Linux PC. I can do this with <a href="http://www.asterisk.org/">asterisk</a> or related programs, but that is like buying UPS when I just need a taxi ride. Yet all I can find are programs that either use 'presence' to shift other-sourced calls to my cell, or ways to use a Bluetooth headset when receiving a call on a PC. Has anyone found a way to use their desktop to make and receive calls through their cell via Bluetooth?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>spaceman375 writes " Like many slashdotters , I 've given up on landlines and have only a cell account .
The problem : when I am home I do n't want to carry my phone on my person , AND I do n't want to have to run ( possibly up or down stairs ) to answer a call .
Landlines solved this with extensions .
I could go buy an xlink or other Bluetooth-to-POTS solution , but that takes money for equipment .
My desktop has Bluetooth , as do my laptop and cell .
All I want is a program that can use my cell 's Bluetooth to make and receive calls from my Linux PC .
I can do this with asterisk or related programs , but that is like buying UPS when I just need a taxi ride .
Yet all I can find are programs that either use 'presence ' to shift other-sourced calls to my cell , or ways to use a Bluetooth headset when receiving a call on a PC .
Has anyone found a way to use their desktop to make and receive calls through their cell via Bluetooth ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>spaceman375 writes "Like many slashdotters, I've given up on landlines and have only a cell account.
The problem: when I am home I don't want to carry my phone on my person, AND I don't want to have to run (possibly up or down stairs) to answer a call.
Landlines solved this with extensions.
I could go buy an xlink or other Bluetooth-to-POTS solution, but that takes money for equipment.
My desktop has Bluetooth, as do my laptop and cell.
All I want is a program that can use my cell's Bluetooth to make and receive calls from my Linux PC.
I can do this with asterisk or related programs, but that is like buying UPS when I just need a taxi ride.
Yet all I can find are programs that either use 'presence' to shift other-sourced calls to my cell, or ways to use a Bluetooth headset when receiving a call on a PC.
Has anyone found a way to use their desktop to make and receive calls through their cell via Bluetooth?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507809</id>
	<title>Re:No such functionality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246190640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.bluesoleil.com/products/index.asp?topic=dialer-mobilephone" title="bluesoleil.com">Bollocks</a> [bluesoleil.com]. You can easily make calls using the phone from the computer. If a headset can do it, what makes you think a computer can't ? I can make calls with one touch from my earpiece. Or do you mean YOUR cellphone doesn't ? Get a decent phone or provider than.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bollocks [ bluesoleil.com ] .
You can easily make calls using the phone from the computer .
If a headset can do it , what makes you think a computer ca n't ?
I can make calls with one touch from my earpiece .
Or do you mean YOUR cellphone does n't ?
Get a decent phone or provider than .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bollocks [bluesoleil.com].
You can easily make calls using the phone from the computer.
If a headset can do it, what makes you think a computer can't ?
I can make calls with one touch from my earpiece.
Or do you mean YOUR cellphone doesn't ?
Get a decent phone or provider than.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508951</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T DECT 6.0</title>
	<author>AvenNYC</author>
	<datestamp>1246201620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought the AT&amp;T DECT 6.0 from best buy not too long ago once my old land line died.  It comes with 2 handsets (a base with answering service, and additional charger and handset).  You can add as many more handsets as you want (I'm sure there is an upper limit...like 10 or 12).</p><p><a href="http://telephones.att.com/telephones\_ui/phone\_store/dsp\_product.cfm?itemID=3930&amp;parent=23655" title="att.com" rel="nofollow">http://telephones.att.com/telephones\_ui/phone\_store/dsp\_product.cfm?itemID=3930&amp;parent=23655</a> [att.com]</p><p>Sure I had to put some gaff tape over all the AT&amp;T Logos, but small price to pay.  When I walk in my house, my iphone cuts in automagically and all calls ring through to the home handsets.  The only downer is that it pulls the caller ID information and compares it to the internal phonebook, and not the phonebook in your cell phone.  If a number is in your phone but not in your AT&amp;T phone it will just show you the number on the ID, and not the name.  When I walk out of the house, by the time i'm down the block I'm into normal cell operation again.  Haven't had any problems with it at all.  Looks sleek too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought the AT&amp;T DECT 6.0 from best buy not too long ago once my old land line died .
It comes with 2 handsets ( a base with answering service , and additional charger and handset ) .
You can add as many more handsets as you want ( I 'm sure there is an upper limit...like 10 or 12 ) .http : //telephones.att.com/telephones \ _ui/phone \ _store/dsp \ _product.cfm ? itemID = 3930&amp;parent = 23655 [ att.com ] Sure I had to put some gaff tape over all the AT&amp;T Logos , but small price to pay .
When I walk in my house , my iphone cuts in automagically and all calls ring through to the home handsets .
The only downer is that it pulls the caller ID information and compares it to the internal phonebook , and not the phonebook in your cell phone .
If a number is in your phone but not in your AT&amp;T phone it will just show you the number on the ID , and not the name .
When I walk out of the house , by the time i 'm down the block I 'm into normal cell operation again .
Have n't had any problems with it at all .
Looks sleek too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought the AT&amp;T DECT 6.0 from best buy not too long ago once my old land line died.
It comes with 2 handsets (a base with answering service, and additional charger and handset).
You can add as many more handsets as you want (I'm sure there is an upper limit...like 10 or 12).http://telephones.att.com/telephones\_ui/phone\_store/dsp\_product.cfm?itemID=3930&amp;parent=23655 [att.com]Sure I had to put some gaff tape over all the AT&amp;T Logos, but small price to pay.
When I walk in my house, my iphone cuts in automagically and all calls ring through to the home handsets.
The only downer is that it pulls the caller ID information and compares it to the internal phonebook, and not the phonebook in your cell phone.
If a number is in your phone but not in your AT&amp;T phone it will just show you the number on the ID, and not the name.
When I walk out of the house, by the time i'm down the block I'm into normal cell operation again.
Haven't had any problems with it at all.
Looks sleek too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28515789</id>
	<title>Easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246298100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pull the battery when you get home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pull the battery when you get home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pull the battery when you get home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508239</id>
	<title>Asterisk...</title>
	<author>lordsid</author>
	<datestamp>1246194840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations you answered your own question in the very same post you posed it in.</p><p>There is no "buying" asterisk, it's open source. At most you will need an FXS card/box. The FXS card allows you to ring your house phones. If you want to deal with a real land line you need an FXO card.</p><p>Using the FollowMe feature in Asterisk will give you exactly what you ask for. In all you shouldn't have to spend more then $300 on the card and computer. Best part is you can keep using the same house phones you've had all along. (SIP phones cost $90+)</p><p>Your ideal setup would be a cellphone with a friends and family package where you pick a number you get unlimited calls to. Setup a SIP account through one of the many services. This will give you a callable number. Pick this as your number in your friends and family package. Connect the asterisk box to the sip account. You can now call home to your asterisk box over the internet for free, you can then call out again using your asterisk box to any other sip user for free or to any other landline for a small charge depending on the service (typically $0.01/min).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations you answered your own question in the very same post you posed it in.There is no " buying " asterisk , it 's open source .
At most you will need an FXS card/box .
The FXS card allows you to ring your house phones .
If you want to deal with a real land line you need an FXO card.Using the FollowMe feature in Asterisk will give you exactly what you ask for .
In all you should n't have to spend more then $ 300 on the card and computer .
Best part is you can keep using the same house phones you 've had all along .
( SIP phones cost $ 90 + ) Your ideal setup would be a cellphone with a friends and family package where you pick a number you get unlimited calls to .
Setup a SIP account through one of the many services .
This will give you a callable number .
Pick this as your number in your friends and family package .
Connect the asterisk box to the sip account .
You can now call home to your asterisk box over the internet for free , you can then call out again using your asterisk box to any other sip user for free or to any other landline for a small charge depending on the service ( typically $ 0.01/min ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations you answered your own question in the very same post you posed it in.There is no "buying" asterisk, it's open source.
At most you will need an FXS card/box.
The FXS card allows you to ring your house phones.
If you want to deal with a real land line you need an FXO card.Using the FollowMe feature in Asterisk will give you exactly what you ask for.
In all you shouldn't have to spend more then $300 on the card and computer.
Best part is you can keep using the same house phones you've had all along.
(SIP phones cost $90+)Your ideal setup would be a cellphone with a friends and family package where you pick a number you get unlimited calls to.
Setup a SIP account through one of the many services.
This will give you a callable number.
Pick this as your number in your friends and family package.
Connect the asterisk box to the sip account.
You can now call home to your asterisk box over the internet for free, you can then call out again using your asterisk box to any other sip user for free or to any other landline for a small charge depending on the service (typically $0.01/min).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509711</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1246209060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I haven't given up my landline, but if I do I'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide landline-type extension phones.</i> <br> <br>...or alternatively, some sort of cellphone signal relay or booster. There are several available, with big variations in price and usefulness depending on just how bad your signal is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't given up my landline , but if I do I 'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide landline-type extension phones .
...or alternatively , some sort of cellphone signal relay or booster .
There are several available , with big variations in price and usefulness depending on just how bad your signal is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't given up my landline, but if I do I'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide landline-type extension phones.
...or alternatively, some sort of cellphone signal relay or booster.
There are several available, with big variations in price and usefulness depending on just how bad your signal is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511339</id>
	<title>Re:Bjorg yourself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246269120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just embed the phone in your brain<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..become a Bjorg.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just embed the phone in your brain ..become a Bjorg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just embed the phone in your brain ..become a Bjorg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509815</id>
	<title>When i first read that...</title>
	<author>pjr.cc</author>
	<datestamp>1246210140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like many others, when i first read it i thought "you lazy cheap SOB". Then it was "wait, he wants to carry around his computer rather then his phone? HOW BIG IS THE F**KING PHONE?"....</p><p>But, it is an interesting techo question in the "can it be done" basket. I've tried "nohands" myself previously and wasnt overly excited by it, it would be nice to be able to walk in my home, stick my phone on charge, have it associate with the server at home which can then route my calls in through the ata and out to the pots phones i have (perhaps it could even do the skype ones too). It would be nice for it to figure out the mobiles plugged in and route out-going ones through there as well (given that work pays for my mobile).</p><p>I think alot of people missed the "if tiny a piece of hardware can be a handsfree kit, why cant a laptop" idea behind it all. In all fairness the geeks here on slashdot (i include myself) do alot of things because we can, not because we should and because its intriguing to the simple geekly instincts within us. This kind of question certainly qualifies</p><p>just my $0.02</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like many others , when i first read it i thought " you lazy cheap SOB " .
Then it was " wait , he wants to carry around his computer rather then his phone ?
HOW BIG IS THE F * * KING PHONE ?
" ....But , it is an interesting techo question in the " can it be done " basket .
I 've tried " nohands " myself previously and wasnt overly excited by it , it would be nice to be able to walk in my home , stick my phone on charge , have it associate with the server at home which can then route my calls in through the ata and out to the pots phones i have ( perhaps it could even do the skype ones too ) .
It would be nice for it to figure out the mobiles plugged in and route out-going ones through there as well ( given that work pays for my mobile ) .I think alot of people missed the " if tiny a piece of hardware can be a handsfree kit , why cant a laptop " idea behind it all .
In all fairness the geeks here on slashdot ( i include myself ) do alot of things because we can , not because we should and because its intriguing to the simple geekly instincts within us .
This kind of question certainly qualifiesjust my $ 0.02</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like many others, when i first read it i thought "you lazy cheap SOB".
Then it was "wait, he wants to carry around his computer rather then his phone?
HOW BIG IS THE F**KING PHONE?
"....But, it is an interesting techo question in the "can it be done" basket.
I've tried "nohands" myself previously and wasnt overly excited by it, it would be nice to be able to walk in my home, stick my phone on charge, have it associate with the server at home which can then route my calls in through the ata and out to the pots phones i have (perhaps it could even do the skype ones too).
It would be nice for it to figure out the mobiles plugged in and route out-going ones through there as well (given that work pays for my mobile).I think alot of people missed the "if tiny a piece of hardware can be a handsfree kit, why cant a laptop" idea behind it all.
In all fairness the geeks here on slashdot (i include myself) do alot of things because we can, not because we should and because its intriguing to the simple geekly instincts within us.
This kind of question certainly qualifiesjust my $0.02</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517405</id>
	<title>It's all about integration.</title>
	<author>ooglek</author>
	<datestamp>1246304100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a home phone (Vonage), a cell phone (Sprint), a cell phone extender/femto-cell (Samsung Airave), a VoIP phone connected to an Asterisk server, Skype, Adium, and a Mac Pro.
<br> <br>
I work from home, so much of my time is spent in front of my computer.  My kids are home from time to time taking a nap, and my wife is at home fairly often as well, so I wear headphones almost constantly so I can listen to music and other beeps and boops from my random communication applications without bothering others, and at a low enough level where I don't get hearing loss, but I also don't hear the outside world.
<br> <br>
Although the poster asked only about one solution, I can see where they are getting at -- Telecom integration.
<br> <br>
It would be convenient to be able to answer all of my various incoming communications -- cell, land line, Skype, SIP and VoIP -- on my desktop.  It would also be convenient to be able to place calls from my desktop to others via whichever route I choose -- Skype, Jajah, Google Voice, SIP, cell phone, land line -- or to be able to build a little LCR (Least Cost Routing) db that chooses for me, based on criteria I can set.  Having access to all of those pieces in a desktop format would enable me to do some cool stuff, and also allow providers I use to add new features via an API to make communications even easier.
<br> <br>
As it is now, in theory this is all possible, but no one has come up with an easy way to integrate it all.  Sure, there are hacks like Asterisk, but then you have to run an additional server or Virtual Machine, and it isn't for the feint of heart.  A desktop app that could do this would be very slick, but there is still the difficulty of integration.  Is it a single device which handles your cell and land lines?  Can you transfer a call in Skype through your desktop to your home phone line, so you can take a call in the bathroom?  Maybe I need to leave and want to continue talking on Jajah but transfer to my cell.
<br> <br>
It just doesn't yet exist, and if it does, it is difficult to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a home phone ( Vonage ) , a cell phone ( Sprint ) , a cell phone extender/femto-cell ( Samsung Airave ) , a VoIP phone connected to an Asterisk server , Skype , Adium , and a Mac Pro .
I work from home , so much of my time is spent in front of my computer .
My kids are home from time to time taking a nap , and my wife is at home fairly often as well , so I wear headphones almost constantly so I can listen to music and other beeps and boops from my random communication applications without bothering others , and at a low enough level where I do n't get hearing loss , but I also do n't hear the outside world .
Although the poster asked only about one solution , I can see where they are getting at -- Telecom integration .
It would be convenient to be able to answer all of my various incoming communications -- cell , land line , Skype , SIP and VoIP -- on my desktop .
It would also be convenient to be able to place calls from my desktop to others via whichever route I choose -- Skype , Jajah , Google Voice , SIP , cell phone , land line -- or to be able to build a little LCR ( Least Cost Routing ) db that chooses for me , based on criteria I can set .
Having access to all of those pieces in a desktop format would enable me to do some cool stuff , and also allow providers I use to add new features via an API to make communications even easier .
As it is now , in theory this is all possible , but no one has come up with an easy way to integrate it all .
Sure , there are hacks like Asterisk , but then you have to run an additional server or Virtual Machine , and it is n't for the feint of heart .
A desktop app that could do this would be very slick , but there is still the difficulty of integration .
Is it a single device which handles your cell and land lines ?
Can you transfer a call in Skype through your desktop to your home phone line , so you can take a call in the bathroom ?
Maybe I need to leave and want to continue talking on Jajah but transfer to my cell .
It just does n't yet exist , and if it does , it is difficult to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a home phone (Vonage), a cell phone (Sprint), a cell phone extender/femto-cell (Samsung Airave), a VoIP phone connected to an Asterisk server, Skype, Adium, and a Mac Pro.
I work from home, so much of my time is spent in front of my computer.
My kids are home from time to time taking a nap, and my wife is at home fairly often as well, so I wear headphones almost constantly so I can listen to music and other beeps and boops from my random communication applications without bothering others, and at a low enough level where I don't get hearing loss, but I also don't hear the outside world.
Although the poster asked only about one solution, I can see where they are getting at -- Telecom integration.
It would be convenient to be able to answer all of my various incoming communications -- cell, land line, Skype, SIP and VoIP -- on my desktop.
It would also be convenient to be able to place calls from my desktop to others via whichever route I choose -- Skype, Jajah, Google Voice, SIP, cell phone, land line -- or to be able to build a little LCR (Least Cost Routing) db that chooses for me, based on criteria I can set.
Having access to all of those pieces in a desktop format would enable me to do some cool stuff, and also allow providers I use to add new features via an API to make communications even easier.
As it is now, in theory this is all possible, but no one has come up with an easy way to integrate it all.
Sure, there are hacks like Asterisk, but then you have to run an additional server or Virtual Machine, and it isn't for the feint of heart.
A desktop app that could do this would be very slick, but there is still the difficulty of integration.
Is it a single device which handles your cell and land lines?
Can you transfer a call in Skype through your desktop to your home phone line, so you can take a call in the bathroom?
Maybe I need to leave and want to continue talking on Jajah but transfer to my cell.
It just doesn't yet exist, and if it does, it is difficult to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510717</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246218240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a nudist, no pockets.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a nudist , no pockets.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a nudist, no pockets.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508653</id>
	<title>you are asking such a backwards question?!?</title>
	<author>crispytwo</author>
	<datestamp>1246198380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In all seriousness... it shouldn't be, "can I share my cell phone with other devices?", it should be "may I use several devices with my phone number?" Notice, it is the phone number that is at issue here, not the "talkie" part.</p><p>The simple answer is yes, but not the way you want to. And no, because the cell phone company will likely not participate... yet. The cell phone companies don't want to provide just "data service" since they wouldn't be able to severely bill you for the extra features on your phone.</p><p>I see that in an ideal world, i.e. the one we don't live in, we would have data access on our phones and that's it... thus voice communication would be just something that your "cell" device can do.</p><p>Today, the easiest way to accomplish what you want here is to use VoIP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all seriousness... it should n't be , " can I share my cell phone with other devices ?
" , it should be " may I use several devices with my phone number ?
" Notice , it is the phone number that is at issue here , not the " talkie " part.The simple answer is yes , but not the way you want to .
And no , because the cell phone company will likely not participate... yet. The cell phone companies do n't want to provide just " data service " since they would n't be able to severely bill you for the extra features on your phone.I see that in an ideal world , i.e .
the one we do n't live in , we would have data access on our phones and that 's it... thus voice communication would be just something that your " cell " device can do.Today , the easiest way to accomplish what you want here is to use VoIP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all seriousness... it shouldn't be, "can I share my cell phone with other devices?
", it should be "may I use several devices with my phone number?
" Notice, it is the phone number that is at issue here, not the "talkie" part.The simple answer is yes, but not the way you want to.
And no, because the cell phone company will likely not participate... yet. The cell phone companies don't want to provide just "data service" since they wouldn't be able to severely bill you for the extra features on your phone.I see that in an ideal world, i.e.
the one we don't live in, we would have data access on our phones and that's it... thus voice communication would be just something that your "cell" device can do.Today, the easiest way to accomplish what you want here is to use VoIP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507999</id>
	<title>The Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246192320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a low-cost, public-domain solution I use. It's called "not answering my phone". If I'm working at home or anticipating a call, I keep my phone nearby. Otherwise, I feel no special obligation to answer it. If you have to worry about emergency work/family calls, assign special ringtones to potential callers-with-emergencies. If you are the sort of person that absolutely must answer it regardless, then simply smoke lots of pot until you're no longer that sort of person. Easy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a low-cost , public-domain solution I use .
It 's called " not answering my phone " .
If I 'm working at home or anticipating a call , I keep my phone nearby .
Otherwise , I feel no special obligation to answer it .
If you have to worry about emergency work/family calls , assign special ringtones to potential callers-with-emergencies .
If you are the sort of person that absolutely must answer it regardless , then simply smoke lots of pot until you 're no longer that sort of person .
Easy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a low-cost, public-domain solution I use.
It's called "not answering my phone".
If I'm working at home or anticipating a call, I keep my phone nearby.
Otherwise, I feel no special obligation to answer it.
If you have to worry about emergency work/family calls, assign special ringtones to potential callers-with-emergencies.
If you are the sort of person that absolutely must answer it regardless, then simply smoke lots of pot until you're no longer that sort of person.
Easy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508435</id>
	<title>Re:Chose FreeSWITCH over Asterisk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246196580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I'm sure you have no relation to the Freeswitch effort and are making these claims from unbiased personal experiences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'm sure you have no relation to the Freeswitch effort and are making these claims from unbiased personal experiences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'm sure you have no relation to the Freeswitch effort and are making these claims from unbiased personal experiences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509123</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246203420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why not use Grand Central?</p></div><p>Oo, oo, I know I know!  I know the answer to this one!  Lookit:</p><p>Because nobody can frickin GET a Grand Central account?  I've been on the waiting list for that thing for about 2 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not use Grand Central ? Oo , oo , I know I know !
I know the answer to this one !
Lookit : Because nobody can frickin GET a Grand Central account ?
I 've been on the waiting list for that thing for about 2 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not use Grand Central?Oo, oo, I know I know!
I know the answer to this one!
Lookit:Because nobody can frickin GET a Grand Central account?
I've been on the waiting list for that thing for about 2 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507455</id>
	<title>OS?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On OSX there is BluePhoneElite.  http://mirasoftware.com/BPE2/</p><p>Your big issue is Bluetooth range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On OSX there is BluePhoneElite .
http : //mirasoftware.com/BPE2/Your big issue is Bluetooth range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On OSX there is BluePhoneElite.
http://mirasoftware.com/BPE2/Your big issue is Bluetooth range.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507741</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1246189920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the guy is ALWAYS on his PC when at home. Maybe he even falls asleep in front of the PC before waking up in the morning to go do his daily tasks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the guy is ALWAYS on his PC when at home .
Maybe he even falls asleep in front of the PC before waking up in the morning to go do his daily tasks ; - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the guy is ALWAYS on his PC when at home.
Maybe he even falls asleep in front of the PC before waking up in the morning to go do his daily tasks ;-))</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509083</id>
	<title>How long until general availability?</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1246202880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1. Get Google Voice.</p></div><p>From the web site: "Google Voice is currently available by invite only." How long did it take Google to get, say, Orkut to the point where invite codes were no longer needed? <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-voice-invites-on-their-way.html" title="blogspot.com">Google's blog</a> [blogspot.com] claims that Google began activating accounts on June 25, 2009, but will the invite backlog become cleared before November 2009?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Get Google Voice.From the web site : " Google Voice is currently available by invite only .
" How long did it take Google to get , say , Orkut to the point where invite codes were no longer needed ?
Google 's blog [ blogspot.com ] claims that Google began activating accounts on June 25 , 2009 , but will the invite backlog become cleared before November 2009 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Get Google Voice.From the web site: "Google Voice is currently available by invite only.
" How long did it take Google to get, say, Orkut to the point where invite codes were no longer needed?
Google's blog [blogspot.com] claims that Google began activating accounts on June 25, 2009, but will the invite backlog become cleared before November 2009?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508181</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>impaledsunset</author>
	<datestamp>1246194300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. Keep the phone in your pocket and don't bother with anything else.</p><p>But if you really want to, use Asterisk. Or use FreeSWITCH as suggested in another post.  They would be easier to set up than looking for other solutions, they are not much resource intensive, so the comparison with UPS would be more acceptable if you could buy them for the price of the taxi. Not only they would do everything you need, but should you decide to extend your needs, you'll be able to do it with just a little change in the configuration. Both are decent solutions, and the fact that they are used for much more massive installations with gazillion of users shouldn't bother you. They're good for one user, too. It's not an overkill when it doesn't increase the cost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
Keep the phone in your pocket and do n't bother with anything else.But if you really want to , use Asterisk .
Or use FreeSWITCH as suggested in another post .
They would be easier to set up than looking for other solutions , they are not much resource intensive , so the comparison with UPS would be more acceptable if you could buy them for the price of the taxi .
Not only they would do everything you need , but should you decide to extend your needs , you 'll be able to do it with just a little change in the configuration .
Both are decent solutions , and the fact that they are used for much more massive installations with gazillion of users should n't bother you .
They 're good for one user , too .
It 's not an overkill when it does n't increase the cost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
Keep the phone in your pocket and don't bother with anything else.But if you really want to, use Asterisk.
Or use FreeSWITCH as suggested in another post.
They would be easier to set up than looking for other solutions, they are not much resource intensive, so the comparison with UPS would be more acceptable if you could buy them for the price of the taxi.
Not only they would do everything you need, but should you decide to extend your needs, you'll be able to do it with just a little change in the configuration.
Both are decent solutions, and the fact that they are used for much more massive installations with gazillion of users shouldn't bother you.
They're good for one user, too.
It's not an overkill when it doesn't increase the cost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517711</id>
	<title>You don't get it</title>
	<author>microbee</author>
	<datestamp>1246305300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He is ALWAYS with his pc while at home. And his couch. And TV.</p><p>What kind of life are YOU having at home?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He is ALWAYS with his pc while at home .
And his couch .
And TV.What kind of life are YOU having at home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is ALWAYS with his pc while at home.
And his couch.
And TV.What kind of life are YOU having at home?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508971</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246201740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>


My cell phone doesn't work in the basement, where I spend time at my workbench (or doing laundry) and
have a landline extension.  I also get only 2 signal bars in some parts of the house, and
have to walk to a different part of the house when receiving a cell phone
call there if I don't want chopped speech and
unexpected dropped calls.  Surely I'm not the only one with this problem.
I haven't given up my landline, but if I do I'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide
landline-type extension phones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it .
My cell phone does n't work in the basement , where I spend time at my workbench ( or doing laundry ) and have a landline extension .
I also get only 2 signal bars in some parts of the house , and have to walk to a different part of the house when receiving a cell phone call there if I do n't want chopped speech and unexpected dropped calls .
Surely I 'm not the only one with this problem .
I have n't given up my landline , but if I do I 'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide landline-type extension phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it.
My cell phone doesn't work in the basement, where I spend time at my workbench (or doing laundry) and
have a landline extension.
I also get only 2 signal bars in some parts of the house, and
have to walk to a different part of the house when receiving a cell phone
call there if I don't want chopped speech and
unexpected dropped calls.
Surely I'm not the only one with this problem.
I haven't given up my landline, but if I do I'll need a solution like Cell2Tel or something to provide
landline-type extension phones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507409</id>
	<title>HFP For Linux</title>
	<author>kylegordon</author>
	<datestamp>1246187280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You probably want to look into the <a href="http://nohands.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">No Hands</a> [sourceforge.net] project. It'll allow you to control your phone remotely over bluetooth from your PC. Aimed primarily at in-car situations, I guess it'll work just as well on the desktop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You probably want to look into the No Hands [ sourceforge.net ] project .
It 'll allow you to control your phone remotely over bluetooth from your PC .
Aimed primarily at in-car situations , I guess it 'll work just as well on the desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You probably want to look into the No Hands [sourceforge.net] project.
It'll allow you to control your phone remotely over bluetooth from your PC.
Aimed primarily at in-car situations, I guess it'll work just as well on the desktop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508111</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>LihTox</author>
	<datestamp>1246193580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cellphones generally have to be charged, and cellphones don't always work everywhere in the house.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cellphones generally have to be charged , and cellphones do n't always work everywhere in the house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cellphones generally have to be charged, and cellphones don't always work everywhere in the house.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517697</id>
	<title>Get a smaller house</title>
	<author>javajedi</author>
	<datestamp>1246305300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've never lived anywhere that I could be in the house but not within ear-shot of/easy walk to my cell phone.  Maybe you should consider getting a smaller house.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never lived anywhere that I could be in the house but not within ear-shot of/easy walk to my cell phone .
Maybe you should consider getting a smaller house .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never lived anywhere that I could be in the house but not within ear-shot of/easy walk to my cell phone.
Maybe you should consider getting a smaller house.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509743</id>
	<title>Re:Chose FreeSWITCH over Asterisk</title>
	<author>mercutioviz</author>
	<datestamp>1246209360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I'd call Diego's personal experiences quite biased. His intro into the FreeSWITCH community was rather rough, but because FS did a better job in his scenario than Asterisk he scored points at his job and has been quite the cheerleader ever since.
<br> <br>
For posterity's sake here's an interesting email thread from a suggestion Diego made, namely that YAML might be a better solution than XML for FS configs:
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2008-June/004019.html" title="freeswitch.org" rel="nofollow">http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2008-June/004019.html</a> [freeswitch.org]
<br> <br>
(BTW, when he suggested that we all thought he was nuts... in fact, we occasionally still think he's nuts but then again most of us in #freeswitch @ irc.freenode.net are a bit crazy.)
<br> <br>
I can attest to Diego doing a good job of helping new ones get up and running, especially when they speak Portugese as a first language.
<br> <br>
Just my $0.02 - do with it as you will.<br>
-MC</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I 'd call Diego 's personal experiences quite biased .
His intro into the FreeSWITCH community was rather rough , but because FS did a better job in his scenario than Asterisk he scored points at his job and has been quite the cheerleader ever since .
For posterity 's sake here 's an interesting email thread from a suggestion Diego made , namely that YAML might be a better solution than XML for FS configs : http : //lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2008-June/004019.html [ freeswitch.org ] ( BTW , when he suggested that we all thought he was nuts... in fact , we occasionally still think he 's nuts but then again most of us in # freeswitch @ irc.freenode.net are a bit crazy .
) I can attest to Diego doing a good job of helping new ones get up and running , especially when they speak Portugese as a first language .
Just my $ 0.02 - do with it as you will .
-MC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I'd call Diego's personal experiences quite biased.
His intro into the FreeSWITCH community was rather rough, but because FS did a better job in his scenario than Asterisk he scored points at his job and has been quite the cheerleader ever since.
For posterity's sake here's an interesting email thread from a suggestion Diego made, namely that YAML might be a better solution than XML for FS configs:
http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2008-June/004019.html [freeswitch.org]
 
(BTW, when he suggested that we all thought he was nuts... in fact, we occasionally still think he's nuts but then again most of us in #freeswitch @ irc.freenode.net are a bit crazy.
)
 
I can attest to Diego doing a good job of helping new ones get up and running, especially when they speak Portugese as a first language.
Just my $0.02 - do with it as you will.
-MC</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28516675</id>
	<title>Re:HFP For Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Appropriation of others posts? I wouldn't expect that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./</p><p>And yes, it works on desktop...<br>Maybe a little bit buggy at the time, but nothing that can't be fixed...and improved. If only i had more time next few weeks<br>i could get my hands dirty a little bit... (and in some kernel stuff i've been waiting for too).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Appropriation of others posts ?
I would n't expect that ./And yes , it works on desktop...Maybe a little bit buggy at the time , but nothing that ca n't be fixed...and improved .
If only i had more time next few weeksi could get my hands dirty a little bit... ( and in some kernel stuff i 've been waiting for too ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Appropriation of others posts?
I wouldn't expect that ./And yes, it works on desktop...Maybe a little bit buggy at the time, but nothing that can't be fixed...and improved.
If only i had more time next few weeksi could get my hands dirty a little bit... (and in some kernel stuff i've been waiting for too).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509677</id>
	<title>Solution seeking another problem</title>
	<author>fletchzip</author>
	<datestamp>1246208700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The limited range of bluetooth is going to impact just how far the phone can be from your PC. Up and downstairs are exactly the type of barriers that bluetooth struggles to overcome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The limited range of bluetooth is going to impact just how far the phone can be from your PC .
Up and downstairs are exactly the type of barriers that bluetooth struggles to overcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The limited range of bluetooth is going to impact just how far the phone can be from your PC.
Up and downstairs are exactly the type of barriers that bluetooth struggles to overcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28523551</id>
	<title>Re:Ignores reality of houses</title>
	<author>jbarr</author>
	<datestamp>1246290240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure how well they work, but there are some "cell phone booster" devices that claim to boost the signal. They'll set you back a couple hundred bucks, but supposedly, they help eliminate just the problem you describe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how well they work , but there are some " cell phone booster " devices that claim to boost the signal .
They 'll set you back a couple hundred bucks , but supposedly , they help eliminate just the problem you describe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how well they work, but there are some "cell phone booster" devices that claim to boost the signal.
They'll set you back a couple hundred bucks, but supposedly, they help eliminate just the problem you describe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508011</id>
	<title>Dock n' talk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246192380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.phonelabs.com/prd05.asp</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.phonelabs.com/prd05.asp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.phonelabs.com/prd05.asp</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517837</id>
	<title>too big?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246305900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly your home is too large - find somewhere smaller...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly your home is too large - find somewhere smaller.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly your home is too large - find somewhere smaller...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28518851</id>
	<title>Get another one...</title>
	<author>Tug3</author>
	<datestamp>1246266600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a bit of an similar issue.
<p>
I wanted to have my mobile to come in two sizes. The BIG one for email, websurfing, and all that. The small one that fits in my jeans' front pocket, confortably. - The solution was two phones. Obviously. But I didn't want to swap the SIM-card every time.
</p><p>
MultiSIM to the rescue! - Luckily the operators in Finland finally started to sell this multi SIM-service. Basically I have two lines that share one number. If both phones are on, they both ring. First one to answer gets the call. When I call out, they both are billed as my primary. (I can actually make double billing by calling out with both phones at once, if I really wanted to.)
</p><p>
Only problem is the SMS. They only go to the primary SIM. I can send naturally with both, but only really receive with one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a bit of an similar issue .
I wanted to have my mobile to come in two sizes .
The BIG one for email , websurfing , and all that .
The small one that fits in my jeans ' front pocket , confortably .
- The solution was two phones .
Obviously. But I did n't want to swap the SIM-card every time .
MultiSIM to the rescue !
- Luckily the operators in Finland finally started to sell this multi SIM-service .
Basically I have two lines that share one number .
If both phones are on , they both ring .
First one to answer gets the call .
When I call out , they both are billed as my primary .
( I can actually make double billing by calling out with both phones at once , if I really wanted to .
) Only problem is the SMS .
They only go to the primary SIM .
I can send naturally with both , but only really receive with one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a bit of an similar issue.
I wanted to have my mobile to come in two sizes.
The BIG one for email, websurfing, and all that.
The small one that fits in my jeans' front pocket, confortably.
- The solution was two phones.
Obviously. But I didn't want to swap the SIM-card every time.
MultiSIM to the rescue!
- Luckily the operators in Finland finally started to sell this multi SIM-service.
Basically I have two lines that share one number.
If both phones are on, they both ring.
First one to answer gets the call.
When I call out, they both are billed as my primary.
(I can actually make double billing by calling out with both phones at once, if I really wanted to.
)

Only problem is the SMS.
They only go to the primary SIM.
I can send naturally with both, but only really receive with one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511127</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>thegoldenear</author>
	<datestamp>1246266000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And fry your balls?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And fry your balls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And fry your balls?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508705</id>
	<title>Simple Solution</title>
	<author>niteshifter</author>
	<datestamp>1246198920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duct tape.</p><p>Just tape the damn phone to you, like under an arm. Then you won't be bothered with having to keep the phone with you. Just position it so that the charging jack is accessible, plug it in while you sleep.</p><p>Now wasn't that easy, quick and simple?</p><p>On a less sarcastic note: You do know that nearly all cell phones use low power BT and that the 30m range is for absolutely perfect conditions? That in the real world of walls / wiring, metal clad big appliances and ambient noise that range can be as low as scant (single digit) meters?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duct tape.Just tape the damn phone to you , like under an arm .
Then you wo n't be bothered with having to keep the phone with you .
Just position it so that the charging jack is accessible , plug it in while you sleep.Now was n't that easy , quick and simple ? On a less sarcastic note : You do know that nearly all cell phones use low power BT and that the 30m range is for absolutely perfect conditions ?
That in the real world of walls / wiring , metal clad big appliances and ambient noise that range can be as low as scant ( single digit ) meters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duct tape.Just tape the damn phone to you, like under an arm.
Then you won't be bothered with having to keep the phone with you.
Just position it so that the charging jack is accessible, plug it in while you sleep.Now wasn't that easy, quick and simple?On a less sarcastic note: You do know that nearly all cell phones use low power BT and that the 30m range is for absolutely perfect conditions?
That in the real world of walls / wiring, metal clad big appliances and ambient noise that range can be as low as scant (single digit) meters?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512575</id>
	<title>If you don't like the answer change the question!</title>
	<author>msh317</author>
	<datestamp>1246281420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're thinking about the problem in far to conventional way - change the question - what you need is a number that friends, family, colleagues, business, etc can reach you.  Your cell phone is just one of many systems designed to carry voice.

A great example of reversing this problem is the former "Grand Central" now "Google Voice".  (Note: I have it under good authority that if you are on the waiting list an additional one million new subscribers will be added as soon as July)

There are dozens of other one number systems - Google Voice is just free.

Now you have a single number of which your cell phone is just one of many ways to answer or place calls.

PS - For those of you keeping up with the Skype/SIP discussion - Skype has agreed to begin providing interconnection to commercial SIP providers.  They have been testing this for about a year and I can attest that the system works very good.  I've been able to place calls to and from my Skype account from any phone including my Cell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're thinking about the problem in far to conventional way - change the question - what you need is a number that friends , family , colleagues , business , etc can reach you .
Your cell phone is just one of many systems designed to carry voice .
A great example of reversing this problem is the former " Grand Central " now " Google Voice " .
( Note : I have it under good authority that if you are on the waiting list an additional one million new subscribers will be added as soon as July ) There are dozens of other one number systems - Google Voice is just free .
Now you have a single number of which your cell phone is just one of many ways to answer or place calls .
PS - For those of you keeping up with the Skype/SIP discussion - Skype has agreed to begin providing interconnection to commercial SIP providers .
They have been testing this for about a year and I can attest that the system works very good .
I 've been able to place calls to and from my Skype account from any phone including my Cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're thinking about the problem in far to conventional way - change the question - what you need is a number that friends, family, colleagues, business, etc can reach you.
Your cell phone is just one of many systems designed to carry voice.
A great example of reversing this problem is the former "Grand Central" now "Google Voice".
(Note: I have it under good authority that if you are on the waiting list an additional one million new subscribers will be added as soon as July)

There are dozens of other one number systems - Google Voice is just free.
Now you have a single number of which your cell phone is just one of many ways to answer or place calls.
PS - For those of you keeping up with the Skype/SIP discussion - Skype has agreed to begin providing interconnection to commercial SIP providers.
They have been testing this for about a year and I can attest that the system works very good.
I've been able to place calls to and from my Skype account from any phone including my Cell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511501</id>
	<title>Is this for real?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246270920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must live in an awful small space. Doesn't Bluetooth only go 30ft? Put it in your pocket or belt clip (or velcro it to your chest) and quit whining.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must live in an awful small space .
Does n't Bluetooth only go 30ft ?
Put it in your pocket or belt clip ( or velcro it to your chest ) and quit whining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must live in an awful small space.
Doesn't Bluetooth only go 30ft?
Put it in your pocket or belt clip (or velcro it to your chest) and quit whining.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507659</id>
	<title>Re:No such functionality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246189200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Celphones, at least ones I have seen, do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there.</i></p><p>The devices certainly exist. Once my cell phone is paired with my car, I can see the phone's contact list on the car dashboard, place calls using the steering wheel controls and the phone call audio is routed through the car's speakers. Even the phone's voice recognition works via bluetooth.</p><p>I haven't heard of this functionality for a pc, but there's no technical reason preventing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Celphones , at least ones I have seen , do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there.The devices certainly exist .
Once my cell phone is paired with my car , I can see the phone 's contact list on the car dashboard , place calls using the steering wheel controls and the phone call audio is routed through the car 's speakers .
Even the phone 's voice recognition works via bluetooth.I have n't heard of this functionality for a pc , but there 's no technical reason preventing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Celphones, at least ones I have seen, do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there.The devices certainly exist.
Once my cell phone is paired with my car, I can see the phone's contact list on the car dashboard, place calls using the steering wheel controls and the phone call audio is routed through the car's speakers.
Even the phone's voice recognition works via bluetooth.I haven't heard of this functionality for a pc, but there's no technical reason preventing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510887</id>
	<title>This is why ENUM was invented</title>
	<author>Compukid</author>
	<datestamp>1246306440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why ENUM was invented.

This is roughly how it works:
1. Convert the phone number to a DNS query.
2. The result is the preferred way to connect to the user.

And DNS can change quite fast so it's dynamic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

EC500 on Avaya phones also has some interesting features.

More details:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENUM" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENUM</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why ENUM was invented .
This is roughly how it works : 1 .
Convert the phone number to a DNS query .
2. The result is the preferred way to connect to the user .
And DNS can change quite fast so it 's dynamic : ) EC500 on Avaya phones also has some interesting features .
More details : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENUM [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why ENUM was invented.
This is roughly how it works:
1.
Convert the phone number to a DNS query.
2. The result is the preferred way to connect to the user.
And DNS can change quite fast so it's dynamic :)

EC500 on Avaya phones also has some interesting features.
More details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENUM [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507695</id>
	<title>I went with a a hardware solution</title>
	<author>midicase</author>
	<datestamp>1246189500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought about these issues and ended up just buying a Panasonic bluetooth capable home phone:
<a href="http://www.panasonic.com/consumer\_electronics/telephones\_central/bluetooth\_phones/default.asp" title="panasonic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.panasonic.com/consumer\_electronics/telephones\_central/bluetooth\_phones/default.asp</a> [panasonic.com]
<br>
I paid about 100 USD.
<br>
When the cell phone is in range the base acts just like a headset but relay's the call to any of the three cordless phone handsets around the house. My wife has even grown accustomed to it but there are a couple drawbacks.  Weak bluetooth signal drains the battery, fast.  No voicemail alert.
<br>
I west so far as to port my land number to wireless and just leave the extra cell phone plugged in the charger near the base-station.  I can't even see the cell or the base-station, just have the threee handset strategically placed around the house.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought about these issues and ended up just buying a Panasonic bluetooth capable home phone : http : //www.panasonic.com/consumer \ _electronics/telephones \ _central/bluetooth \ _phones/default.asp [ panasonic.com ] I paid about 100 USD .
When the cell phone is in range the base acts just like a headset but relay 's the call to any of the three cordless phone handsets around the house .
My wife has even grown accustomed to it but there are a couple drawbacks .
Weak bluetooth signal drains the battery , fast .
No voicemail alert .
I west so far as to port my land number to wireless and just leave the extra cell phone plugged in the charger near the base-station .
I ca n't even see the cell or the base-station , just have the threee handset strategically placed around the house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought about these issues and ended up just buying a Panasonic bluetooth capable home phone:
http://www.panasonic.com/consumer\_electronics/telephones\_central/bluetooth\_phones/default.asp [panasonic.com]

I paid about 100 USD.
When the cell phone is in range the base acts just like a headset but relay's the call to any of the three cordless phone handsets around the house.
My wife has even grown accustomed to it but there are a couple drawbacks.
Weak bluetooth signal drains the battery, fast.
No voicemail alert.
I west so far as to port my land number to wireless and just leave the extra cell phone plugged in the charger near the base-station.
I can't even see the cell or the base-station, just have the threee handset strategically placed around the house.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507477</id>
	<title>Asterisk &amp; chan\_mobile</title>
	<author>ewirt</author>
	<datestamp>1246187700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Check out the Asterisk software, and specifically the "chan\_mobile" extension.  It allows you to use a cellphone (with bluetooth) as an "incoming" channel for a phone system, or to use the cellphone as an extension on the phone system.  I believe that chan\_mobile is included by default in the newest (1.6.x) version of the asterisk software.<br> <br>

Asterisk has a fairly steep learning curve, so it will likely be a time consuming adventure to get it all working, but assuming the bluetooth on your phone supports it, it should allow you to do what you want.  You will need to have a Linux computer that has bluetooth, runs the asterisk software, and you will also need an "FXS" port (can be a $15 internal card, or a $30 IP based one) that connects your home phones to the computer.<br> <br>

The <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk" title="voip-info.org" rel="nofollow">voip-info.org site</a> [voip-info.org] and the <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/" title="digium.com" rel="nofollow">asterisk-users mailing list</a> [digium.com] are both invaluable if you are just starting out with asterisk.<br> <br>

If diving into setting up your own asterisk server from scratch is too daunting, it may be easiest to try a prebuilt setup (such as <a href="http://trixbox.org/" title="trixbox.org" rel="nofollow">Trixbox CE</a> [trixbox.org]) and then following one of the guides for adding chan\_mobile support to it.  I can't personally say how involved this would be, since I've never used any of the pre-setup Asterisk systems.<br> <br>

Good luck!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the Asterisk software , and specifically the " chan \ _mobile " extension .
It allows you to use a cellphone ( with bluetooth ) as an " incoming " channel for a phone system , or to use the cellphone as an extension on the phone system .
I believe that chan \ _mobile is included by default in the newest ( 1.6.x ) version of the asterisk software .
Asterisk has a fairly steep learning curve , so it will likely be a time consuming adventure to get it all working , but assuming the bluetooth on your phone supports it , it should allow you to do what you want .
You will need to have a Linux computer that has bluetooth , runs the asterisk software , and you will also need an " FXS " port ( can be a $ 15 internal card , or a $ 30 IP based one ) that connects your home phones to the computer .
The voip-info.org site [ voip-info.org ] and the asterisk-users mailing list [ digium.com ] are both invaluable if you are just starting out with asterisk .
If diving into setting up your own asterisk server from scratch is too daunting , it may be easiest to try a prebuilt setup ( such as Trixbox CE [ trixbox.org ] ) and then following one of the guides for adding chan \ _mobile support to it .
I ca n't personally say how involved this would be , since I 've never used any of the pre-setup Asterisk systems .
Good luck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the Asterisk software, and specifically the "chan\_mobile" extension.
It allows you to use a cellphone (with bluetooth) as an "incoming" channel for a phone system, or to use the cellphone as an extension on the phone system.
I believe that chan\_mobile is included by default in the newest (1.6.x) version of the asterisk software.
Asterisk has a fairly steep learning curve, so it will likely be a time consuming adventure to get it all working, but assuming the bluetooth on your phone supports it, it should allow you to do what you want.
You will need to have a Linux computer that has bluetooth, runs the asterisk software, and you will also need an "FXS" port (can be a $15 internal card, or a $30 IP based one) that connects your home phones to the computer.
The voip-info.org site [voip-info.org] and the asterisk-users mailing list [digium.com] are both invaluable if you are just starting out with asterisk.
If diving into setting up your own asterisk server from scratch is too daunting, it may be easiest to try a prebuilt setup (such as Trixbox CE [trixbox.org]) and then following one of the guides for adding chan\_mobile support to it.
I can't personally say how involved this would be, since I've never used any of the pre-setup Asterisk systems.
Good luck!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507321</id>
	<title>Use Forward</title>
	<author>lunk</author>
	<datestamp>1246186680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just forward my calls to my asterisk instance with *72 on Verizon. *72111-222-3333.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just forward my calls to my asterisk instance with * 72 on Verizon .
* 72111-222-3333 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just forward my calls to my asterisk instance with *72 on Verizon.
*72111-222-3333.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507223</id>
	<title>No, but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246185960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then I haven't looked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then I have n't looked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then I haven't looked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508253</id>
	<title>Want HAL or Minerva (or her sister Athene)</title>
	<author>rcpitt</author>
	<datestamp>1246194960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK - so I plug my cell into the USB dongle that charges it - now I want the phone to be answered by the AI in my machine - and filter the call: pass it through via the speakers and microphones in the house, record a message, or call the FTC/CRTC for the voice spammer.
<p>
So I want all the functionality of turning the phone into a demarc point to the cell service - so I can call out, answer, ignore or whatever - but through the AI (penguin powered) in my home.
</p><p>
There's a product in there somewhere!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK - so I plug my cell into the USB dongle that charges it - now I want the phone to be answered by the AI in my machine - and filter the call : pass it through via the speakers and microphones in the house , record a message , or call the FTC/CRTC for the voice spammer .
So I want all the functionality of turning the phone into a demarc point to the cell service - so I can call out , answer , ignore or whatever - but through the AI ( penguin powered ) in my home .
There 's a product in there somewhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK - so I plug my cell into the USB dongle that charges it - now I want the phone to be answered by the AI in my machine - and filter the call: pass it through via the speakers and microphones in the house, record a message, or call the FTC/CRTC for the voice spammer.
So I want all the functionality of turning the phone into a demarc point to the cell service - so I can call out, answer, ignore or whatever - but through the AI (penguin powered) in my home.
There's a product in there somewhere!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507671</id>
	<title>Cellphone, home phone, sip and the freebox</title>
	<author>orogorhotmail.com</author>
	<datestamp>1246189260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you live in France you get a my favorite ISP, (don t have any commercial relation but be one of his customer), free (appears at fbx.proxad.net on irc )who has what they call a freebox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebox), which is one of the inventor as what we know now as triple pay for internet, phone, and video, and they offer as a small but good geek bonus an option like a sip account, wifi, and redirections of your phone line linked to your adsl account to that sip account you own. now if you have a phone on which the sip works (bought a n85 a week ago), then you can do what as you want, have a single device. However note that peoples still have 2 numbers to contact you and you still have 2 outgoing choices for phone calls.
They got other bonuses like tivo like recoder with HD channels, about 180 channels, and phone to landline to 60 countries for 30&#226;, good news server retention, usualy, 6MB adsl, ipv6, Gb sized mail with zimbra and web account with apache mysql. (note that they had to inovate and redo the dslam infrastructure to do that), hoo too much goodies.
I even like their geeky tv ads, and i mean by anyway , long time ago in france when isp were charging us for internet access on top of the phone comunication fee (which was way higher than now), and free was the first to have no charge on top of the phone fees, and that's where they got their name and then their infrastructure and budget to do what they do now.
Now also be prepaired to wait for 3 months to get your dsl line, because the historic operator always  make a few errors when switching the connecting to their lines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you live in France you get a my favorite ISP , ( don t have any commercial relation but be one of his customer ) , free ( appears at fbx.proxad.net on irc ) who has what they call a freebox ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebox ) , which is one of the inventor as what we know now as triple pay for internet , phone , and video , and they offer as a small but good geek bonus an option like a sip account , wifi , and redirections of your phone line linked to your adsl account to that sip account you own .
now if you have a phone on which the sip works ( bought a n85 a week ago ) , then you can do what as you want , have a single device .
However note that peoples still have 2 numbers to contact you and you still have 2 outgoing choices for phone calls .
They got other bonuses like tivo like recoder with HD channels , about 180 channels , and phone to landline to 60 countries for 30   , good news server retention , usualy , 6MB adsl , ipv6 , Gb sized mail with zimbra and web account with apache mysql .
( note that they had to inovate and redo the dslam infrastructure to do that ) , hoo too much goodies .
I even like their geeky tv ads , and i mean by anyway , long time ago in france when isp were charging us for internet access on top of the phone comunication fee ( which was way higher than now ) , and free was the first to have no charge on top of the phone fees , and that 's where they got their name and then their infrastructure and budget to do what they do now .
Now also be prepaired to wait for 3 months to get your dsl line , because the historic operator always make a few errors when switching the connecting to their lines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you live in France you get a my favorite ISP, (don t have any commercial relation but be one of his customer), free (appears at fbx.proxad.net on irc )who has what they call a freebox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebox), which is one of the inventor as what we know now as triple pay for internet, phone, and video, and they offer as a small but good geek bonus an option like a sip account, wifi, and redirections of your phone line linked to your adsl account to that sip account you own.
now if you have a phone on which the sip works (bought a n85 a week ago), then you can do what as you want, have a single device.
However note that peoples still have 2 numbers to contact you and you still have 2 outgoing choices for phone calls.
They got other bonuses like tivo like recoder with HD channels, about 180 channels, and phone to landline to 60 countries for 30â, good news server retention, usualy, 6MB adsl, ipv6, Gb sized mail with zimbra and web account with apache mysql.
(note that they had to inovate and redo the dslam infrastructure to do that), hoo too much goodies.
I even like their geeky tv ads, and i mean by anyway , long time ago in france when isp were charging us for internet access on top of the phone comunication fee (which was way higher than now), and free was the first to have no charge on top of the phone fees, and that's where they got their name and then their infrastructure and budget to do what they do now.
Now also be prepaired to wait for 3 months to get your dsl line, because the historic operator always  make a few errors when switching the connecting to their lines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509045</id>
	<title>Just think about it</title>
	<author>tengu1sd</author>
	<datestamp>1246202580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One option is simply to carry your phone around
<p>
Or you could set up a Vonage line and have it simultaneously ring your cell.  I worked at home for 4 years and took advantage of this.  Any calls to my <i>home number</i> were promptly answered.
</p><p>
Or just wait for <a href="http://www.google.com/voice" title="google.com">Google Voice</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One option is simply to carry your phone around Or you could set up a Vonage line and have it simultaneously ring your cell .
I worked at home for 4 years and took advantage of this .
Any calls to my home number were promptly answered .
Or just wait for Google Voice [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One option is simply to carry your phone around

Or you could set up a Vonage line and have it simultaneously ring your cell.
I worked at home for 4 years and took advantage of this.
Any calls to my home number were promptly answered.
Or just wait for Google Voice [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507725</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246189740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another reason to want this is something I ran into at college this year.  My crappy t-mobile service does not work in any building on campus, including my room, so the phone has to stay on the window sill behind my raised bed, making picking up phonecalls inconvenient.  I ended up using a bluetooth headset, but a computer solution would have been easier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason to want this is something I ran into at college this year .
My crappy t-mobile service does not work in any building on campus , including my room , so the phone has to stay on the window sill behind my raised bed , making picking up phonecalls inconvenient .
I ended up using a bluetooth headset , but a computer solution would have been easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason to want this is something I ran into at college this year.
My crappy t-mobile service does not work in any building on campus, including my room, so the phone has to stay on the window sill behind my raised bed, making picking up phonecalls inconvenient.
I ended up using a bluetooth headset, but a computer solution would have been easier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509497</id>
	<title>Thanks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246207260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wrote the question, and I just want to thank everyone who kindly suggested that I just carry the phone with me.<br> I know it will seem hard to believe, but that never occurred to me! So thank you! Slashdot comes through again!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wrote the question , and I just want to thank everyone who kindly suggested that I just carry the phone with me .
I know it will seem hard to believe , but that never occurred to me !
So thank you !
Slashdot comes through again ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wrote the question, and I just want to thank everyone who kindly suggested that I just carry the phone with me.
I know it will seem hard to believe, but that never occurred to me!
So thank you!
Slashdot comes through again!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508375</id>
	<title>pleasurable solution</title>
	<author>ragutis</author>
	<datestamp>1246196100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solution 1:<br>Wear clothes<br>Wear cellphone</p><p>Solution 2, if you don't want to wear clothes.</p><p>Acquire velcro cable ties</p><p>Attach above to cell<br>Set cell to vibrate</p><p>Call friends, leave messages.</p><p>Use velcro to attach cell to proper body part</p><p>enjoy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solution 1 : Wear clothesWear cellphoneSolution 2 , if you do n't want to wear clothes.Acquire velcro cable tiesAttach above to cellSet cell to vibrateCall friends , leave messages.Use velcro to attach cell to proper body partenjoy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solution 1:Wear clothesWear cellphoneSolution 2, if you don't want to wear clothes.Acquire velcro cable tiesAttach above to cellSet cell to vibrateCall friends, leave messages.Use velcro to attach cell to proper body partenjoy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507439</id>
	<title>Why so complicated?</title>
	<author>fluch</author>
	<datestamp>1246187460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Place your battery charger at a convenient place and when ever you get home plug the phone into the charger and do NOT unplug it untill you leave the house. Then you have the same functionality as you had with a fixed line phone with a cord. You cannot misplace your phone anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Place your battery charger at a convenient place and when ever you get home plug the phone into the charger and do NOT unplug it untill you leave the house .
Then you have the same functionality as you had with a fixed line phone with a cord .
You can not misplace your phone anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Place your battery charger at a convenient place and when ever you get home plug the phone into the charger and do NOT unplug it untill you leave the house.
Then you have the same functionality as you had with a fixed line phone with a cord.
You cannot misplace your phone anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507461</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>chipschap</author>
	<datestamp>1246187640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't need to pay for a Skype number; get a Gizmo account.  That works perfectly in conjunction with Google Voice (formerly Grand Central).  Google Voice will ring your cell phone and your Gizmo SIP number simultaneously.  This makes for a completely free solution (but people will have to learn to call your Google Voice number).

You can also make free domestic calls from Google Voice, via Gizmo.  Google Voice will ring your Gizmo SIP number and then connect your call.

Of course, the other option, as many here have stated, is to put your phone in your pocket and be done with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need to pay for a Skype number ; get a Gizmo account .
That works perfectly in conjunction with Google Voice ( formerly Grand Central ) .
Google Voice will ring your cell phone and your Gizmo SIP number simultaneously .
This makes for a completely free solution ( but people will have to learn to call your Google Voice number ) .
You can also make free domestic calls from Google Voice , via Gizmo .
Google Voice will ring your Gizmo SIP number and then connect your call .
Of course , the other option , as many here have stated , is to put your phone in your pocket and be done with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need to pay for a Skype number; get a Gizmo account.
That works perfectly in conjunction with Google Voice (formerly Grand Central).
Google Voice will ring your cell phone and your Gizmo SIP number simultaneously.
This makes for a completely free solution (but people will have to learn to call your Google Voice number).
You can also make free domestic calls from Google Voice, via Gizmo.
Google Voice will ring your Gizmo SIP number and then connect your call.
Of course, the other option, as many here have stated, is to put your phone in your pocket and be done with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512961</id>
	<title>Fattie</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1246284060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The problem: when I am home I don't want to carry my phone on my person, AND I don't want to have to run (possibly up or down stairs) to answer a call.</p> </div><p>No wonder we are nation of fucking fatsoes and pencilnecks. I don't carry my cell phone with me at home, but that doesn't stop me from running, what, 20-30 feet, to get it when it rings.</p><p>

Seriously, this was a lame excuse to throw some money @ technology for the hell of it while moving one step closer to be one of those Wall-e space fatties on floating platforms. Amazing that you even call that <b> <i>"a problem"</i> </b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem : when I am home I do n't want to carry my phone on my person , AND I do n't want to have to run ( possibly up or down stairs ) to answer a call .
No wonder we are nation of fucking fatsoes and pencilnecks .
I do n't carry my cell phone with me at home , but that does n't stop me from running , what , 20-30 feet , to get it when it rings .
Seriously , this was a lame excuse to throw some money @ technology for the hell of it while moving one step closer to be one of those Wall-e space fatties on floating platforms .
Amazing that you even call that " a problem " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem: when I am home I don't want to carry my phone on my person, AND I don't want to have to run (possibly up or down stairs) to answer a call.
No wonder we are nation of fucking fatsoes and pencilnecks.
I don't carry my cell phone with me at home, but that doesn't stop me from running, what, 20-30 feet, to get it when it rings.
Seriously, this was a lame excuse to throw some money @ technology for the hell of it while moving one step closer to be one of those Wall-e space fatties on floating platforms.
Amazing that you even call that  "a problem" .
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507971</id>
	<title>Easy Cheep Way</title>
	<author>WillRobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1246192140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go buy a flipping magic jack, and call forward your cell. Plug your old pots phones into the magic jack and done. for 20$ a year or so. That cheep enough??? Unlimited long distance too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go buy a flipping magic jack , and call forward your cell .
Plug your old pots phones into the magic jack and done .
for 20 $ a year or so .
That cheep enough ? ? ?
Unlimited long distance too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go buy a flipping magic jack, and call forward your cell.
Plug your old pots phones into the magic jack and done.
for 20$ a year or so.
That cheep enough???
Unlimited long distance too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507415</id>
	<title>Skype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use a skype phone number, and set it to forward calls to your cell if you don't pick or you're not logged in.</p><p>Seems much simpler.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use a skype phone number , and set it to forward calls to your cell if you do n't pick or you 're not logged in.Seems much simpler .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use a skype phone number, and set it to forward calls to your cell if you don't pick or you're not logged in.Seems much simpler.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508759</id>
	<title>Encrypted cellular</title>
	<author>dyfet</author>
	<datestamp>1246199700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had experimented with pairing a PC bluetooth with a cell phone.  Mostly though I was experimenting with establishing a ZRTP-like session over bluetooth audio to do secure end-to-end media over the cellular network, rather than the application proposed here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had experimented with pairing a PC bluetooth with a cell phone .
Mostly though I was experimenting with establishing a ZRTP-like session over bluetooth audio to do secure end-to-end media over the cellular network , rather than the application proposed here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had experimented with pairing a PC bluetooth with a cell phone.
Mostly though I was experimenting with establishing a ZRTP-like session over bluetooth audio to do secure end-to-end media over the cellular network, rather than the application proposed here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507715</id>
	<title>Chose FreeSWITCH over Asterisk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246189560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been using FreeSWITCH, it does much more things than Asterisk and it's a lot more stable and flexible, check it out: http://www.freeswitch.org/<br><br>Most VoIP providers such as Teliax Inc, Bandwidth.com, iCall, etc, are switching from Asterisk to FreeSWITCH because of it's flexibility, stability and features.<br><br>"How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk?"<br>http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been using FreeSWITCH , it does much more things than Asterisk and it 's a lot more stable and flexible , check it out : http : //www.freeswitch.org/Most VoIP providers such as Teliax Inc , Bandwidth.com , iCall , etc , are switching from Asterisk to FreeSWITCH because of it 's flexibility , stability and features .
" How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk ?
" http : //www.freeswitch.org/node/117</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been using FreeSWITCH, it does much more things than Asterisk and it's a lot more stable and flexible, check it out: http://www.freeswitch.org/Most VoIP providers such as Teliax Inc, Bandwidth.com, iCall, etc, are switching from Asterisk to FreeSWITCH because of it's flexibility, stability and features.
"How does FreeSWITCH compare to Asterisk?
"http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507751</id>
	<title>So, you're a cheap consumer?</title>
	<author>holophrastic</author>
	<datestamp>1246190100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have a free solution -- putting your phone in your pocket, which is actually easier than leaving it somewhere.<br>You have a convenient solution -- you've listed a system that gives you the pots.<br>You have an extravagent solution -- you can go ups.</p><p>And you still aren't happy?!</p><p>Write your own, and stop whining.  I'd kill to have those three solutions for any of my problems: do little, spend money, or get a lot.  You aren't happy with any of them?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have a free solution -- putting your phone in your pocket , which is actually easier than leaving it somewhere.You have a convenient solution -- you 've listed a system that gives you the pots.You have an extravagent solution -- you can go ups.And you still are n't happy ?
! Write your own , and stop whining .
I 'd kill to have those three solutions for any of my problems : do little , spend money , or get a lot .
You are n't happy with any of them ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have a free solution -- putting your phone in your pocket, which is actually easier than leaving it somewhere.You have a convenient solution -- you've listed a system that gives you the pots.You have an extravagent solution -- you can go ups.And you still aren't happy?
!Write your own, and stop whining.
I'd kill to have those three solutions for any of my problems: do little, spend money, or get a lot.
You aren't happy with any of them?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507855</id>
	<title>Unpopular Answer</title>
	<author>thpdg</author>
	<datestamp>1246191000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For Windows, most of the Bluetooth dongles I've tried come with the profile and drivers to use the PC as a Bluetooth speakerphone for a paired PC.<br>Is there such a possibility for Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For Windows , most of the Bluetooth dongles I 've tried come with the profile and drivers to use the PC as a Bluetooth speakerphone for a paired PC.Is there such a possibility for Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Windows, most of the Bluetooth dongles I've tried come with the profile and drivers to use the PC as a Bluetooth speakerphone for a paired PC.Is there such a possibility for Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507219</id>
	<title>no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246185960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773</id>
	<title>Carry the phone with you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246190340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it amazing that you're asking for a solution that requires no effort to set up, lets you answer the phone everywhere and does not require any investment. It looks like you're asking for the impossible. However the solution is very simple:</p><p>CARRY THE DAMN PHONE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES</p><p>If you don't want to carry it, that's what extensions are for. You're asking how to convert your PC in an extension. Also, you'll need to rush to the extension (or your PC, and let me tell you that buying an extension is cheaper than buying a PC) every time it rings.</p><p>You're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications. It doesn't exist yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it amazing that you 're asking for a solution that requires no effort to set up , lets you answer the phone everywhere and does not require any investment .
It looks like you 're asking for the impossible .
However the solution is very simple : CARRY THE DAMN PHONE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMESIf you do n't want to carry it , that 's what extensions are for .
You 're asking how to convert your PC in an extension .
Also , you 'll need to rush to the extension ( or your PC , and let me tell you that buying an extension is cheaper than buying a PC ) every time it rings.You 're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications .
It does n't exist yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it amazing that you're asking for a solution that requires no effort to set up, lets you answer the phone everywhere and does not require any investment.
It looks like you're asking for the impossible.
However the solution is very simple:CARRY THE DAMN PHONE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMESIf you don't want to carry it, that's what extensions are for.
You're asking how to convert your PC in an extension.
Also, you'll need to rush to the extension (or your PC, and let me tell you that buying an extension is cheaper than buying a PC) every time it rings.You're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications.
It doesn't exist yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511323</id>
	<title>Hands-free and Remote-SIM</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246268760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bluetooth already has profiles for exactly this use case...just about every car out there that has Bluetooth support implements the Hands-free and Remote-SIM profiles.<br>Those allow the car kit to take over call handling from the phone.  Think of the phone as becoming just a Bluetooth voice modem.<br>Hands-free lets you use the car's mic and speakers and Remote-SIM gives the car kit full address to your address book to access the missed/last-dialled/etc calls list, do address book searches and do calling ID/name lookups.</p><p>The down side:  Linux has been very slow in embracing Bluetooth, IMHO of course...and support's very patchy.  Focus seems to have been on either just phone tethering or OBEX file send/receive.  SCO/voice/audio/A2DP and the more advanced profiles seem to be mostly ignored/neglected which is sad.  A well-intregrated set of Bluetooth profiles would be really awesome (not that Windows does an amazingly better job on integration)</p><p>Andries</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bluetooth already has profiles for exactly this use case...just about every car out there that has Bluetooth support implements the Hands-free and Remote-SIM profiles.Those allow the car kit to take over call handling from the phone .
Think of the phone as becoming just a Bluetooth voice modem.Hands-free lets you use the car 's mic and speakers and Remote-SIM gives the car kit full address to your address book to access the missed/last-dialled/etc calls list , do address book searches and do calling ID/name lookups.The down side : Linux has been very slow in embracing Bluetooth , IMHO of course...and support 's very patchy .
Focus seems to have been on either just phone tethering or OBEX file send/receive .
SCO/voice/audio/A2DP and the more advanced profiles seem to be mostly ignored/neglected which is sad .
A well-intregrated set of Bluetooth profiles would be really awesome ( not that Windows does an amazingly better job on integration ) Andries</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bluetooth already has profiles for exactly this use case...just about every car out there that has Bluetooth support implements the Hands-free and Remote-SIM profiles.Those allow the car kit to take over call handling from the phone.
Think of the phone as becoming just a Bluetooth voice modem.Hands-free lets you use the car's mic and speakers and Remote-SIM gives the car kit full address to your address book to access the missed/last-dialled/etc calls list, do address book searches and do calling ID/name lookups.The down side:  Linux has been very slow in embracing Bluetooth, IMHO of course...and support's very patchy.
Focus seems to have been on either just phone tethering or OBEX file send/receive.
SCO/voice/audio/A2DP and the more advanced profiles seem to be mostly ignored/neglected which is sad.
A well-intregrated set of Bluetooth profiles would be really awesome (not that Windows does an amazingly better job on integration)Andries</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28516823</id>
	<title>Use SIP telephony!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246301940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi,</p><p>Here in Sweden, there are several landline/mobile operators using VoIP. I have Megaphone as a telephony provider (www.megaphone.se), a VoIP box from Linksys connected to my fiber access at home and a Nokia E51 (has a built-in SIP client, which works with both WiFi and 3G+). From my operator I have 2 SIP accounts linked to the same phone number (a landline numer). So I can pick up all calls from either the cell or one of my landline phones.</p><p>Advantages:<br>- One number, answer from any phone.<br>- CHEAP calls abroad: about 0.01Euro/min within Europe + the data traffic on 3G if I use the cell (add 0.03E/min). They also have a plan with "unlimited" 3G (up to 1GB I believe) for 20E/month. [Prices are actually in Swedish Crowns, 1E is about 10Kr]</p><p>Drawbacks:<br>- Megaphone does not guarantee that there is enough bandwidth on their 3G+ (HSPA@7.2Mbps) network, so the sound can be terrible. In such cases, I call back using the GSM number.</p><p>Stephane</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi,Here in Sweden , there are several landline/mobile operators using VoIP .
I have Megaphone as a telephony provider ( www.megaphone.se ) , a VoIP box from Linksys connected to my fiber access at home and a Nokia E51 ( has a built-in SIP client , which works with both WiFi and 3G + ) .
From my operator I have 2 SIP accounts linked to the same phone number ( a landline numer ) .
So I can pick up all calls from either the cell or one of my landline phones.Advantages : - One number , answer from any phone.- CHEAP calls abroad : about 0.01Euro/min within Europe + the data traffic on 3G if I use the cell ( add 0.03E/min ) .
They also have a plan with " unlimited " 3G ( up to 1GB I believe ) for 20E/month .
[ Prices are actually in Swedish Crowns , 1E is about 10Kr ] Drawbacks : - Megaphone does not guarantee that there is enough bandwidth on their 3G + ( HSPA @ 7.2Mbps ) network , so the sound can be terrible .
In such cases , I call back using the GSM number.Stephane</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi,Here in Sweden, there are several landline/mobile operators using VoIP.
I have Megaphone as a telephony provider (www.megaphone.se), a VoIP box from Linksys connected to my fiber access at home and a Nokia E51 (has a built-in SIP client, which works with both WiFi and 3G+).
From my operator I have 2 SIP accounts linked to the same phone number (a landline numer).
So I can pick up all calls from either the cell or one of my landline phones.Advantages:- One number, answer from any phone.- CHEAP calls abroad: about 0.01Euro/min within Europe + the data traffic on 3G if I use the cell (add 0.03E/min).
They also have a plan with "unlimited" 3G (up to 1GB I believe) for 20E/month.
[Prices are actually in Swedish Crowns, 1E is about 10Kr]Drawbacks:- Megaphone does not guarantee that there is enough bandwidth on their 3G+ (HSPA@7.2Mbps) network, so the sound can be terrible.
In such cases, I call back using the GSM number.Stephane</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507269</id>
	<title>It's possible, but...</title>
	<author>Burpmaster</author>
	<datestamp>1246186260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The BlueZ code to <em>host</em> the handsfree profile is fairly new and might be immature. And I don't know of a program to actually <em>use</em> it, so you might have to write your own client program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The BlueZ code to host the handsfree profile is fairly new and might be immature .
And I do n't know of a program to actually use it , so you might have to write your own client program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BlueZ code to host the handsfree profile is fairly new and might be immature.
And I don't know of a program to actually use it, so you might have to write your own client program.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508725</id>
	<title>Similar to the unpopular Answer</title>
	<author>PapaSmurph</author>
	<datestamp>1246199220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been looking for something exactly like that, but for my Windows Vista notebook, that way, I can use my notebook mics and speakers as a hands free phone. HFP for Linux would be great, but not being much of a Microsoft code monkey, I doubt I could get it to work.</p><p>Patrick (thpdg (519053)), any ideas if the software for those dongles would work with the "HP Integrated Module with Bluetooth 2.0 Wireless Technology" in my notebook?</p><p>Anyone?</p><p>Anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been looking for something exactly like that , but for my Windows Vista notebook , that way , I can use my notebook mics and speakers as a hands free phone .
HFP for Linux would be great , but not being much of a Microsoft code monkey , I doubt I could get it to work.Patrick ( thpdg ( 519053 ) ) , any ideas if the software for those dongles would work with the " HP Integrated Module with Bluetooth 2.0 Wireless Technology " in my notebook ? Anyone ? Anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been looking for something exactly like that, but for my Windows Vista notebook, that way, I can use my notebook mics and speakers as a hands free phone.
HFP for Linux would be great, but not being much of a Microsoft code monkey, I doubt I could get it to work.Patrick (thpdg (519053)), any ideas if the software for those dongles would work with the "HP Integrated Module with Bluetooth 2.0 Wireless Technology" in my notebook?Anyone?Anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507485</id>
	<title>Hunkasaurus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever Google Voice decides to launch, your problems will be solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever Google Voice decides to launch , your problems will be solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever Google Voice decides to launch, your problems will be solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508197</id>
	<title>Bluetooth Cordless Phones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246194420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an old Uniden ELBT595- it pairs to a cellphone as a handsfree and you can use it like normal after that.  Still on Uniden's site, but I don't see it at BestBuy's anymore- and its only single extension.  Going to Telephones/Cordless/Bluetooth on Bestbuy's site came up with a couple DECT expandable setups - AT&amp;T TL92278 and Panasonic KX-TH1212B as examples.  Seems like what you are after to me.</p><p>LTGTFY - http://tinyurl.com/lq3pml</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an old Uniden ELBT595- it pairs to a cellphone as a handsfree and you can use it like normal after that .
Still on Uniden 's site , but I do n't see it at BestBuy 's anymore- and its only single extension .
Going to Telephones/Cordless/Bluetooth on Bestbuy 's site came up with a couple DECT expandable setups - AT&amp;T TL92278 and Panasonic KX-TH1212B as examples .
Seems like what you are after to me.LTGTFY - http : //tinyurl.com/lq3pml</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an old Uniden ELBT595- it pairs to a cellphone as a handsfree and you can use it like normal after that.
Still on Uniden's site, but I don't see it at BestBuy's anymore- and its only single extension.
Going to Telephones/Cordless/Bluetooth on Bestbuy's site came up with a couple DECT expandable setups - AT&amp;T TL92278 and Panasonic KX-TH1212B as examples.
Seems like what you are after to me.LTGTFY - http://tinyurl.com/lq3pml</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508075</id>
	<title>Here's an easy solution..</title>
	<author>SuperCharlie</author>
	<datestamp>1246193100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kids less than ~12 yrs old.

It goes like this..

GET ME MY PHONE<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids less than ~ 12 yrs old .
It goes like this. . GET ME MY PHONE : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids less than ~12 yrs old.
It goes like this..

GET ME MY PHONE :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</id>
	<title>Grand Central</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246186200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand you dont want to run for your phone -- Bluetooth won't reach up and down stairs, so linking phone and computer are likely not going to solve your problem. Why not use Grand Central <a href="http://www.grandcentral.com/" title="grandcentral.com">http://www.grandcentral.com/</a> [grandcentral.com] and a Skype number? Have Grand Central ring your cell and your Skype number at the same time. Then whichever you're closest to, you can answer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand you dont want to run for your phone -- Bluetooth wo n't reach up and down stairs , so linking phone and computer are likely not going to solve your problem .
Why not use Grand Central http : //www.grandcentral.com/ [ grandcentral.com ] and a Skype number ?
Have Grand Central ring your cell and your Skype number at the same time .
Then whichever you 're closest to , you can answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand you dont want to run for your phone -- Bluetooth won't reach up and down stairs, so linking phone and computer are likely not going to solve your problem.
Why not use Grand Central http://www.grandcentral.com/ [grandcentral.com] and a Skype number?
Have Grand Central ring your cell and your Skype number at the same time.
Then whichever you're closest to, you can answer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510245</id>
	<title>The BT stack can do this</title>
	<author>elad</author>
	<datestamp>1246214100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My depressingly cheap and tiny USB dongle comes with a bluetooth stack that allows you to do just that - connect to the phone via BT, dial, and use PC's speaker and mic as the BT headset.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My depressingly cheap and tiny USB dongle comes with a bluetooth stack that allows you to do just that - connect to the phone via BT , dial , and use PC 's speaker and mic as the BT headset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My depressingly cheap and tiny USB dongle comes with a bluetooth stack that allows you to do just that - connect to the phone via BT, dial, and use PC's speaker and mic as the BT headset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507625</id>
	<title>Same problem- so fixed it</title>
	<author>iamtheprincess</author>
	<datestamp>1246188900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are not near the computer at all times
sometimes out side working so not realistic to have the cell phone on you.
and have to have it inside pluged in to charge.
So I got a house phone with base unit and 3 portable phones.
solved all problems

karen
<a href="http://www.iamtheprincess.com/" title="iamtheprincess.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.iamtheprincess.com/</a> [iamtheprincess.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are not near the computer at all times sometimes out side working so not realistic to have the cell phone on you .
and have to have it inside pluged in to charge .
So I got a house phone with base unit and 3 portable phones .
solved all problems karen http : //www.iamtheprincess.com/ [ iamtheprincess.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are not near the computer at all times
sometimes out side working so not realistic to have the cell phone on you.
and have to have it inside pluged in to charge.
So I got a house phone with base unit and 3 portable phones.
solved all problems

karen
http://www.iamtheprincess.com/ [iamtheprincess.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507821</id>
	<title>Google Talk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246190760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this would require that you either have a landline or voip setup in your house, but check out google talk<br>http://www.google.com/talk/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this would require that you either have a landline or voip setup in your house , but check out google talkhttp : //www.google.com/talk/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this would require that you either have a landline or voip setup in your house, but check out google talkhttp://www.google.com/talk/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051</id>
	<title>Ignores reality of houses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246192740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a number of houses, if you go in the basement the cell signal may die off.  Just having it with you doesn't mean you'll always get calls... that's why something like a cell phone docking station that can stay up where signal is strongest makes sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a number of houses , if you go in the basement the cell signal may die off .
Just having it with you does n't mean you 'll always get calls... that 's why something like a cell phone docking station that can stay up where signal is strongest makes sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a number of houses, if you go in the basement the cell signal may die off.
Just having it with you doesn't mean you'll always get calls... that's why something like a cell phone docking station that can stay up where signal is strongest makes sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508187</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246194360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vonage offers something similar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vonage offers something similar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vonage offers something similar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508969</id>
	<title>Hey there, Third of Five.</title>
	<author>rantingkitten</author>
	<datestamp>1246201740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are not a Borg.  You do not have to be plugged into the collective hive mind at all times.  Come home from work, put the phone on your desk / table / kitchen counter, and leave it there.  If it rings while you're away, call the person back if you must.   <br>
<br>
Or just leave the thing in your pocket.  I'm "old school" enough to still have a Razr, which is thin enough to keep in my back pocket at all times without my even noticing it's there.  <br>
<br>
Yes, I realise that wasn't the solution you were seeking, but you are asking for a solution to a "problem" that seems ridiculous to most people, judging from the commentary.  If you want to get serious answers you're probably going to have to give us some context or rationale, because otherwise your question seems, well, let's just say "eccentric".</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are not a Borg .
You do not have to be plugged into the collective hive mind at all times .
Come home from work , put the phone on your desk / table / kitchen counter , and leave it there .
If it rings while you 're away , call the person back if you must .
Or just leave the thing in your pocket .
I 'm " old school " enough to still have a Razr , which is thin enough to keep in my back pocket at all times without my even noticing it 's there .
Yes , I realise that was n't the solution you were seeking , but you are asking for a solution to a " problem " that seems ridiculous to most people , judging from the commentary .
If you want to get serious answers you 're probably going to have to give us some context or rationale , because otherwise your question seems , well , let 's just say " eccentric " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are not a Borg.
You do not have to be plugged into the collective hive mind at all times.
Come home from work, put the phone on your desk / table / kitchen counter, and leave it there.
If it rings while you're away, call the person back if you must.
Or just leave the thing in your pocket.
I'm "old school" enough to still have a Razr, which is thin enough to keep in my back pocket at all times without my even noticing it's there.
Yes, I realise that wasn't the solution you were seeking, but you are asking for a solution to a "problem" that seems ridiculous to most people, judging from the commentary.
If you want to get serious answers you're probably going to have to give us some context or rationale, because otherwise your question seems, well, let's just say "eccentric".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512451</id>
	<title>Re:1989 called.</title>
	<author>quenda</author>
	<datestamp>1246280340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gordon, The 1990s called. Apparently they want back their joke about calls from a previous decade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gordon , The 1990s called .
Apparently they want back their joke about calls from a previous decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gordon, The 1990s called.
Apparently they want back their joke about calls from a previous decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28525309</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>jas203</author>
	<datestamp>1246394940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Bluetooth link runs up and down stairs without any problems - the "base-station" is using a Class 1 radio and actually reaches further than my WiFi router for all the laptops in my house.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Bluetooth link runs up and down stairs without any problems - the " base-station " is using a Class 1 radio and actually reaches further than my WiFi router for all the laptops in my house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Bluetooth link runs up and down stairs without any problems - the "base-station" is using a Class 1 radio and actually reaches further than my WiFi router for all the laptops in my house.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507437</id>
	<title>Three options</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Carry your cellphone with you. Could be a problem if you like to roam the house naked.<br>2. Get a landline. Could be a problem if you're allergic to landlines.<br>3. Let the damn thing ring. Could be a problem if you have some compulsive need to be instantly at everyone's beck and call. In that case see a shrink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Carry your cellphone with you .
Could be a problem if you like to roam the house naked.2 .
Get a landline .
Could be a problem if you 're allergic to landlines.3 .
Let the damn thing ring .
Could be a problem if you have some compulsive need to be instantly at everyone 's beck and call .
In that case see a shrink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Carry your cellphone with you.
Could be a problem if you like to roam the house naked.2.
Get a landline.
Could be a problem if you're allergic to landlines.3.
Let the damn thing ring.
Could be a problem if you have some compulsive need to be instantly at everyone's beck and call.
In that case see a shrink.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507581</id>
	<title>My solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246188540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a solution called a "cell phone belt holster", and it cost me $14 at some store in the local mall. If my phone vibrates, no matter where I am inside or outside my house, I can answer it immediately.</p><p>If the phone's NOT on my belt, it means I don't want to answer a call. When I had a landline, if it rang while I was brushing my teeth, it went to voicemail. My cell phone's no different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a solution called a " cell phone belt holster " , and it cost me $ 14 at some store in the local mall .
If my phone vibrates , no matter where I am inside or outside my house , I can answer it immediately.If the phone 's NOT on my belt , it means I do n't want to answer a call .
When I had a landline , if it rang while I was brushing my teeth , it went to voicemail .
My cell phone 's no different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a solution called a "cell phone belt holster", and it cost me $14 at some store in the local mall.
If my phone vibrates, no matter where I am inside or outside my house, I can answer it immediately.If the phone's NOT on my belt, it means I don't want to answer a call.
When I had a landline, if it rang while I was brushing my teeth, it went to voicemail.
My cell phone's no different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508153</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>imamac</author>
	<datestamp>1246194060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Get Google Voice.
2. Set it to ring your cell and a Skype number.
3. No step 3.  See how easy that was?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Get Google Voice .
2. Set it to ring your cell and a Skype number .
3. No step 3 .
See how easy that was ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Get Google Voice.
2. Set it to ring your cell and a Skype number.
3. No step 3.
See how easy that was?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513299</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1246286520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can think of one scenario in which the OP's thinking would be valid (of course there could be many more). In my home, I can only pick up a signal in certain spots. I would say that reception is sketchy in 50\% of the house, and non-existent in 25\%. So, it may make sense, if I cared enough to do it, to find one spot where the phone gets good reception and either use a bluetooth headset, or a PC solution as a way of making and receiving calls when in dead zones, or, if the range isn't quite good enough, to put the phone in the one spot of the living room where I know I can get a signal, and not have to worry about dropped calls, if I wander into the dining room.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of one scenario in which the OP 's thinking would be valid ( of course there could be many more ) .
In my home , I can only pick up a signal in certain spots .
I would say that reception is sketchy in 50 \ % of the house , and non-existent in 25 \ % .
So , it may make sense , if I cared enough to do it , to find one spot where the phone gets good reception and either use a bluetooth headset , or a PC solution as a way of making and receiving calls when in dead zones , or , if the range is n't quite good enough , to put the phone in the one spot of the living room where I know I can get a signal , and not have to worry about dropped calls , if I wander into the dining room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of one scenario in which the OP's thinking would be valid (of course there could be many more).
In my home, I can only pick up a signal in certain spots.
I would say that reception is sketchy in 50\% of the house, and non-existent in 25\%.
So, it may make sense, if I cared enough to do it, to find one spot where the phone gets good reception and either use a bluetooth headset, or a PC solution as a way of making and receiving calls when in dead zones, or, if the range isn't quite good enough, to put the phone in the one spot of the living room where I know I can get a signal, and not have to worry about dropped calls, if I wander into the dining room.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510119</id>
	<title>Re:Ignores reality of houses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246213080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's not invent a new problem the OP didn't specify. Besides, there are edge cases that could disqualify almost any solution. It doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's not invent a new problem the OP did n't specify .
Besides , there are edge cases that could disqualify almost any solution .
It does n't have to be perfect , it just has to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's not invent a new problem the OP didn't specify.
Besides, there are edge cases that could disqualify almost any solution.
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512703</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>inmytaxi</author>
	<datestamp>1246282620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try a studio apartment, makes my life simple enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try a studio apartment , makes my life simple enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try a studio apartment, makes my life simple enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507913</id>
	<title>HFP for Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246191660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you are interested you can try HFP for linux ( http://nohands.sourceforge.net/ )<br>I seem to have some problem with hearing my mobile while i'm at computer with headphones... so it's always nice to have<br>an On Screen Display to show me of incoming calls at least.<br>And for all those<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ers who are just discussing why you want that solution instead of giving hints, maybe because they don't know the solution i've to say... grow up!</p><p>good luck with it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are interested you can try HFP for linux ( http : //nohands.sourceforge.net/ ) I seem to have some problem with hearing my mobile while i 'm at computer with headphones... so it 's always nice to havean On Screen Display to show me of incoming calls at least.And for all those ./ers who are just discussing why you want that solution instead of giving hints , maybe because they do n't know the solution i 've to say... grow up ! good luck with it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are interested you can try HFP for linux ( http://nohands.sourceforge.net/ )I seem to have some problem with hearing my mobile while i'm at computer with headphones... so it's always nice to havean On Screen Display to show me of incoming calls at least.And for all those ./ers who are just discussing why you want that solution instead of giving hints, maybe because they don't know the solution i've to say... grow up!good luck with it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513597</id>
	<title>Asterisk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246288380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>install asterisk 1.6 and configure chan\_mobile</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>install asterisk 1.6 and configure chan \ _mobile</tokentext>
<sentencetext>install asterisk 1.6 and configure chan\_mobile</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507403</id>
	<title>HFP Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look at HFP for Linux: <a href="http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/linux/125997-hfp-linux-bluetooth-hands-free.html" title="mp3car.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/linux/125997-hfp-linux-bluetooth-hands-free.html</a> [mp3car.com]. I've been able to dial my phone over bluetooth, and use the desktop's mic and speakers for the call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at HFP for Linux : http : //www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/linux/125997-hfp-linux-bluetooth-hands-free.html [ mp3car.com ] .
I 've been able to dial my phone over bluetooth , and use the desktop 's mic and speakers for the call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at HFP for Linux: http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/linux/125997-hfp-linux-bluetooth-hands-free.html [mp3car.com].
I've been able to dial my phone over bluetooth, and use the desktop's mic and speakers for the call.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510857</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solution: Put the cell phone in the middle of the stairway.</p><p>Now you only need to run half the way up or down the stairs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solution : Put the cell phone in the middle of the stairway.Now you only need to run half the way up or down the stairs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solution: Put the cell phone in the middle of the stairway.Now you only need to run half the way up or down the stairs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263</id>
	<title>No such functionality</title>
	<author>Alex Belits</author>
	<datestamp>1246186260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Celphones, at least ones I have seen, do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there. It may be possible to make a computer pretend to be a headset, however an easier solution would be to simply wear a Bluetooth headset with sufficient range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Celphones , at least ones I have seen , do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there .
It may be possible to make a computer pretend to be a headset , however an easier solution would be to simply wear a Bluetooth headset with sufficient range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Celphones, at least ones I have seen, do not allow initiating calls from a remotely attached computer or forwarding audio there.
It may be possible to make a computer pretend to be a headset, however an easier solution would be to simply wear a Bluetooth headset with sufficient range.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508593</id>
	<title>why?</title>
	<author>speedtux</author>
	<datestamp>1246197780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bluephone Elite for the Mac kind of does what you are asking for.  But why?  A cell phone is actually better at making phone calls than a desktop PC, desktop microphone, and desktop speakers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bluephone Elite for the Mac kind of does what you are asking for .
But why ?
A cell phone is actually better at making phone calls than a desktop PC , desktop microphone , and desktop speakers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bluephone Elite for the Mac kind of does what you are asking for.
But why?
A cell phone is actually better at making phone calls than a desktop PC, desktop microphone, and desktop speakers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511059</id>
	<title>Femtocell?</title>
	<author>GotenXiao</author>
	<datestamp>1246308360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the problem seems to be one of coverage (i.e. his basement gets none) a better solution (that would allow him to keep the phone with him) would be to install a femtocell in his house so he can get coverage. Vodafone are launching them in the UK, people like IP Access (http://www.ipaccess.com/picocells/index.php) produce them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the problem seems to be one of coverage ( i.e .
his basement gets none ) a better solution ( that would allow him to keep the phone with him ) would be to install a femtocell in his house so he can get coverage .
Vodafone are launching them in the UK , people like IP Access ( http : //www.ipaccess.com/picocells/index.php ) produce them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the problem seems to be one of coverage (i.e.
his basement gets none) a better solution (that would allow him to keep the phone with him) would be to install a femtocell in his house so he can get coverage.
Vodafone are launching them in the UK, people like IP Access (http://www.ipaccess.com/picocells/index.php) produce them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</id>
	<title>Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246185960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't want to be bothered with carrying the phone with you (the easiest solution), and don't want to be bothered with having to run up or downstairs to answer the phone, so your idea is to what - answer it from your PC, which if you're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer??? Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't want to be bothered with carrying the phone with you ( the easiest solution ) , and do n't want to be bothered with having to run up or downstairs to answer the phone , so your idea is to what - answer it from your PC , which if you 're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer ? ? ?
Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't want to be bothered with carrying the phone with you (the easiest solution), and don't want to be bothered with having to run up or downstairs to answer the phone, so your idea is to what - answer it from your PC, which if you're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer???
Just pocket the stupid phone and be done with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507357</id>
	<title>Two options</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246186860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Install an elevator so you don't have to run up and down stairs, or carry your phone with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Install an elevator so you do n't have to run up and down stairs , or carry your phone with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Install an elevator so you don't have to run up and down stairs, or carry your phone with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507655</id>
	<title>Let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Pokey.Clyde</author>
	<datestamp>1246189140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You neither want to carry your phone with you, nor do you want to have to actually walk somewhere to answer it.  Are you really that damn lazy?  It's a damn phone.  Stick it in your pocket and be done with it.  Shit, do you need help tying your shoes, too?  Get a helmet and go on about your life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You neither want to carry your phone with you , nor do you want to have to actually walk somewhere to answer it .
Are you really that damn lazy ?
It 's a damn phone .
Stick it in your pocket and be done with it .
Shit , do you need help tying your shoes , too ?
Get a helmet and go on about your life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You neither want to carry your phone with you, nor do you want to have to actually walk somewhere to answer it.
Are you really that damn lazy?
It's a damn phone.
Stick it in your pocket and be done with it.
Shit, do you need help tying your shoes, too?
Get a helmet and go on about your life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510883</id>
	<title>The obvious solution..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246306380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The solution to this is very obvious.. just get a small cell phone and carry it with you everywhere. Why would you want to route your calls from a small portable device to a big desktop computer? It makes no sense. You would still have to run around to your computer/laptop when you need to answer a call. Just carry a small cell phone.<br>And by the way, why would you use a Bluetooth headset to connect to your PC to answer calls, when you can connect the Bluetooth headset directly to your phone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The solution to this is very obvious.. just get a small cell phone and carry it with you everywhere .
Why would you want to route your calls from a small portable device to a big desktop computer ?
It makes no sense .
You would still have to run around to your computer/laptop when you need to answer a call .
Just carry a small cell phone.And by the way , why would you use a Bluetooth headset to connect to your PC to answer calls , when you can connect the Bluetooth headset directly to your phone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The solution to this is very obvious.. just get a small cell phone and carry it with you everywhere.
Why would you want to route your calls from a small portable device to a big desktop computer?
It makes no sense.
You would still have to run around to your computer/laptop when you need to answer a call.
Just carry a small cell phone.And by the way, why would you use a Bluetooth headset to connect to your PC to answer calls, when you can connect the Bluetooth headset directly to your phone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512923</id>
	<title>Re:Carry the phone with you</title>
	<author>Spatial</author>
	<datestamp>1246283880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications. It doesn't exist yet.</p></div><p>Wrong.  The 'Off' button is already invented.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications .
It does n't exist yet.Wrong .
The 'Off ' button is already invented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're asking for the ultimate solution in telecommunications.
It doesn't exist yet.Wrong.
The 'Off' button is already invented.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508415</id>
	<title>My Suggestion</title>
	<author>webheaded</author>
	<datestamp>1246196400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take your cell phone and put it on your computer desk.  This is the most retarded question I've ever seen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take your cell phone and put it on your computer desk .
This is the most retarded question I 've ever seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take your cell phone and put it on your computer desk.
This is the most retarded question I've ever seen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507955</id>
	<title>Panasonic has a solution for this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246191960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know where the OP has been shopping around, but Panasonic makes a <a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Phones-Fax/Telephones/Bluetooth-Enabled-Systems/model.KX-TH1212B\_11002\_7000000000000005702" title="panasonic.com" rel="nofollow">Bluetooth based DECT home phone system</a> [panasonic.com]. Just place the cell phone next to the main unit. And all incoming/outgoing calls go through the handsets. And you can add more handsets for each room of the house. Last time I checked, Fry's Electronics (brick and mortar stores) were selling these for around USD$75 for a starter kit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know where the OP has been shopping around , but Panasonic makes a Bluetooth based DECT home phone system [ panasonic.com ] .
Just place the cell phone next to the main unit .
And all incoming/outgoing calls go through the handsets .
And you can add more handsets for each room of the house .
Last time I checked , Fry 's Electronics ( brick and mortar stores ) were selling these for around USD $ 75 for a starter kit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know where the OP has been shopping around, but Panasonic makes a Bluetooth based DECT home phone system [panasonic.com].
Just place the cell phone next to the main unit.
And all incoming/outgoing calls go through the handsets.
And you can add more handsets for each room of the house.
Last time I checked, Fry's Electronics (brick and mortar stores) were selling these for around USD$75 for a starter kit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28514015</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1246290300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because it's now Google Voice - they removed everyone form the Grand Central list when the bought it, just didn't tell you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because it 's now Google Voice - they removed everyone form the Grand Central list when the bought it , just did n't tell you ; -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because it's now Google Voice - they removed everyone form the Grand Central list when the bought it, just didn't tell you ;-p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507645</id>
	<title>Re:No such functionality</title>
	<author>ttldkns</author>
	<datestamp>1246189080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>check out bluephone elite. its for the mac, but it does everything the OP wants</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>check out bluephone elite .
its for the mac , but it does everything the OP wants</tokentext>
<sentencetext>check out bluephone elite.
its for the mac, but it does everything the OP wants</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507463</id>
	<title>You're over thinking it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You want to be able to answer your phone from your computer?  That would indicate that you plan on being at/near your computer while you are home.  Why not just leave your cell phone sitting on your desk?  Since you would have to be there to answer it using the computer anyway you won't have to go any further than you would with your idea.</p><p>You're trying to over think this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You want to be able to answer your phone from your computer ?
That would indicate that you plan on being at/near your computer while you are home .
Why not just leave your cell phone sitting on your desk ?
Since you would have to be there to answer it using the computer anyway you wo n't have to go any further than you would with your idea.You 're trying to over think this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want to be able to answer your phone from your computer?
That would indicate that you plan on being at/near your computer while you are home.
Why not just leave your cell phone sitting on your desk?
Since you would have to be there to answer it using the computer anyway you won't have to go any further than you would with your idea.You're trying to over think this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507399</id>
	<title>From a previous /. thread...</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1246187220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How 'bout something like the <a href="http://www.myxlink.com/index.aspx" title="myxlink.com" rel="nofollow">XLink</a> [myxlink.com] or <a href="http://www.cell2telgateway.com/" title="cell2telgateway.com" rel="nofollow">one of these</a> [cell2telgateway.com] similar products?</p><p>This isn't what you're asking for, but it might actually be close to what you really <i>want</i>.</p><p>(I haven't used anything like these, but a couple people said good things about the XLink one in a previous<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. story this was mentioned in.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 'bout something like the XLink [ myxlink.com ] or one of these [ cell2telgateway.com ] similar products ? This is n't what you 're asking for , but it might actually be close to what you really want .
( I have n't used anything like these , but a couple people said good things about the XLink one in a previous / .
story this was mentioned in .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How 'bout something like the XLink [myxlink.com] or one of these [cell2telgateway.com] similar products?This isn't what you're asking for, but it might actually be close to what you really want.
(I haven't used anything like these, but a couple people said good things about the XLink one in a previous /.
story this was mentioned in.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507599</id>
	<title>Re:Grand Central</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246188660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to say that I use this service.  which is now voice.google.com and I love it.  Obviously it is still not open to everyone but you can request an invite.  I wish it would still let me invite people or else I would.  But I have this one number ring my cell, my comp and my office.  The downside to this is that if someone calls your cell phone directly it will still only ring your cell phone not all of them because you get a new number with Google Voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say that I use this service .
which is now voice.google.com and I love it .
Obviously it is still not open to everyone but you can request an invite .
I wish it would still let me invite people or else I would .
But I have this one number ring my cell , my comp and my office .
The downside to this is that if someone calls your cell phone directly it will still only ring your cell phone not all of them because you get a new number with Google Voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say that I use this service.
which is now voice.google.com and I love it.
Obviously it is still not open to everyone but you can request an invite.
I wish it would still let me invite people or else I would.
But I have this one number ring my cell, my comp and my office.
The downside to this is that if someone calls your cell phone directly it will still only ring your cell phone not all of them because you get a new number with Google Voice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513479</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an easy solution..</title>
	<author>DRACO-</author>
	<datestamp>1246287540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have kids, you wont have to worry about incoming calls and finding the cellphone.  The cellphone will be attached to the child if you dont get them their own and incoming calls will just get ignored or sent to voicemail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have kids , you wont have to worry about incoming calls and finding the cellphone .
The cellphone will be attached to the child if you dont get them their own and incoming calls will just get ignored or sent to voicemail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have kids, you wont have to worry about incoming calls and finding the cellphone.
The cellphone will be attached to the child if you dont get them their own and incoming calls will just get ignored or sent to voicemail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507389</id>
	<title>1989 called.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246187160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They want their breezeblock-sized phones that run off a car battery back.  Apparently you were supposed to go and buy a modern phone that you can carry with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They want their breezeblock-sized phones that run off a car battery back .
Apparently you were supposed to go and buy a modern phone that you can carry with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They want their breezeblock-sized phones that run off a car battery back.
Apparently you were supposed to go and buy a modern phone that you can carry with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509929</id>
	<title>Is this a joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246211280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this a joke?  OMG I had to sign up for an account just to reply to this.  Are you retarded? Or what?  How big a house do you have?  If it's a really big one you can afford to have someone install computers and phone jacks and whatever else it takes to set up so you can do a hands free answer wherever you are and you won't have to lift a finger never mind walk up or downstairs.  If it's a small house - move a little, you'll live longer and be able to give us all a laugh for longer assuming your mind can keep up with technology and you can keep on posting these type of questions.  Wait a minute, I'm being judgemental - is there a reason you can't carry your phone into another room?  Maybe you're a neuro surgeon on call (god help your patients).  Or did you suffer brain damage and have someone checking on you regularly? Or was your post just a joke? If you want to answer your phone that badly  you'll find a way.  Like Cylix, my daughter forwards her cell to her  base station (without having to pay for the home phone).  PopeRatzo - hilarious, the funniest comment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a joke ?
OMG I had to sign up for an account just to reply to this .
Are you retarded ?
Or what ?
How big a house do you have ?
If it 's a really big one you can afford to have someone install computers and phone jacks and whatever else it takes to set up so you can do a hands free answer wherever you are and you wo n't have to lift a finger never mind walk up or downstairs .
If it 's a small house - move a little , you 'll live longer and be able to give us all a laugh for longer assuming your mind can keep up with technology and you can keep on posting these type of questions .
Wait a minute , I 'm being judgemental - is there a reason you ca n't carry your phone into another room ?
Maybe you 're a neuro surgeon on call ( god help your patients ) .
Or did you suffer brain damage and have someone checking on you regularly ?
Or was your post just a joke ?
If you want to answer your phone that badly you 'll find a way .
Like Cylix , my daughter forwards her cell to her base station ( without having to pay for the home phone ) .
PopeRatzo - hilarious , the funniest comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a joke?
OMG I had to sign up for an account just to reply to this.
Are you retarded?
Or what?
How big a house do you have?
If it's a really big one you can afford to have someone install computers and phone jacks and whatever else it takes to set up so you can do a hands free answer wherever you are and you won't have to lift a finger never mind walk up or downstairs.
If it's a small house - move a little, you'll live longer and be able to give us all a laugh for longer assuming your mind can keep up with technology and you can keep on posting these type of questions.
Wait a minute, I'm being judgemental - is there a reason you can't carry your phone into another room?
Maybe you're a neuro surgeon on call (god help your patients).
Or did you suffer brain damage and have someone checking on you regularly?
Or was your post just a joke?
If you want to answer your phone that badly  you'll find a way.
Like Cylix, my daughter forwards her cell to her  base station (without having to pay for the home phone).
PopeRatzo - hilarious, the funniest comment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511817</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1246273980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"which if you're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer???"</p><p>What is this "away from it" of which you speak?</p><p>I spend lots of time on the computer and such a solution would avoid having to reach for the phone, dig it out of my belly folds, etc. To be able to respond to calls with a mouse click, have all data/messages displayed on my laptop screen, etc would be genuinely useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" which if you 're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer ? ? ?
" What is this " away from it " of which you speak ? I spend lots of time on the computer and such a solution would avoid having to reach for the phone , dig it out of my belly folds , etc .
To be able to respond to calls with a mouse click , have all data/messages displayed on my laptop screen , etc would be genuinely useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"which if you're away from it would STILL necessitate you having to rush to it up or downstairs to answer???
"What is this "away from it" of which you speak?I spend lots of time on the computer and such a solution would avoid having to reach for the phone, dig it out of my belly folds, etc.
To be able to respond to calls with a mouse click, have all data/messages displayed on my laptop screen, etc would be genuinely useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507523</id>
	<title>This thread is fucking stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246188060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, get with the now.<br>You feel comfortable carrying your laptop with you, but your mobile is too much of a problem?</p><p>Fucking wank American.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , get with the now.You feel comfortable carrying your laptop with you , but your mobile is too much of a problem ? Fucking wank American .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, get with the now.You feel comfortable carrying your laptop with you, but your mobile is too much of a problem?Fucking wank American.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508141</id>
	<title>simple solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246193940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>use ooma..one time hardware purchase..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>use ooma..one time hardware purchase. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>use ooma..one time hardware purchase..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507537</id>
	<title>Change Bluetooth Adapters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246188120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe change to a Class 1 Bluetooth adapter so you can put the phone anywhere. With the latest Widcomm/Broadcom Bluetooth stacks, you can answer calls on the PC. (Windows)</p><p>At least with Sony Ericsson phones, you can make/answer calls with Bluetooth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe change to a Class 1 Bluetooth adapter so you can put the phone anywhere .
With the latest Widcomm/Broadcom Bluetooth stacks , you can answer calls on the PC .
( Windows ) At least with Sony Ericsson phones , you can make/answer calls with Bluetooth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe change to a Class 1 Bluetooth adapter so you can put the phone anywhere.
With the latest Widcomm/Broadcom Bluetooth stacks, you can answer calls on the PC.
(Windows)At least with Sony Ericsson phones, you can make/answer calls with Bluetooth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508081</id>
	<title>You are now in the dictionary ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246193220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Under the entry "educated idiot".</p><p>You're lucky I'm not in charge, because if I was you'd be taken away in the night for a few years of<br>hard labor, after which I am willing to bet you'd quit worrying about problems you don't even have.</p><p>Now excuse me while I PUKE at the thought of your existence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Under the entry " educated idiot " .You 're lucky I 'm not in charge , because if I was you 'd be taken away in the night for a few years ofhard labor , after which I am willing to bet you 'd quit worrying about problems you do n't even have.Now excuse me while I PUKE at the thought of your existence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Under the entry "educated idiot".You're lucky I'm not in charge, because if I was you'd be taken away in the night for a few years ofhard labor, after which I am willing to bet you'd quit worrying about problems you don't even have.Now excuse me while I PUKE at the thought of your existence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507829</id>
	<title>Convergence</title>
	<author>ivoras</author>
	<datestamp>1246190880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not very imaginative to conclude that the ultimate goal of these technologies is to achieve convergence between the various devices, to seamlessly use them all from either one of them.</p><p>My own short-term wishlist is:</p><ul>
<li>Store personal information, like the address book, possibly e-mail and other messages, etc. mirrored (synced in real time) between my mobile phone and a datacenter in a bunker somewhere safe. I carry my mobile phone around with me all the time, so every desktop should just pick up the data from it. OTOH, I also need a secure backup if I lose it. Encryption can solve most of the issues here.</li><li>Have a high-speed low-range wireless link between my desktop and my phone when I put it on the desk (or are somewhere in the room). By "high-speed" here I mean "enough to transfer data such as the mentioned address book, e-mail, etc." in real-time back and forth. 54 Mbit/s looks "good enough" for this purpose. I imagine something like Bluetooth on steroids, only less sucky, probably using IPv6 rather than some internal ad-hoc packet formatting. I want the mobile phone to be a regular network node and that's where Bluetooth fails. I also don't want for the phone batteries not to be excessively drained from using the link, so WiFi also fails.</li><li>If the mobile phone CPU is strong enough (and it looks like the new 500 MHz+ mobile phones are bordering "enough"), run some basic applications on the mobile phone but access it via "remote desktop" (e.g. VNC, RDP, whatever) from the desktop. Even better, use something like VMWare and similar applications do and make "seamless" integration between the windows of the mobile phone and the "real" desktop, with smart sharing of specific services like audio and phonecalls made from the desktop. Of course, I don't want to run big or CPU-intensive applications on the phone, but I imagine something with the capabilities of Word 95 (remember, it ran on 486 machines with 100 MHz and 4 MB of RAM) would be fine.</li><li>Have a long-range low-bandwidth connection for general Internet access (of course, with fallback to the low-range high-bandwidth one when in range), capable of relatively (from 2009. point of view) low-bandwidth tasks like streaming standard-def YouTube videos, city-wide.</li></ul><p>This is what I think I need, YMMV. Much of these points are very very near of being done already. The major thing that's holding the whole concept back is that the cell-phone manufacturers (or probably more probably, the telcos) insist that the phones don't run a general purpose OS that would make it all possible with custom applications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not very imaginative to conclude that the ultimate goal of these technologies is to achieve convergence between the various devices , to seamlessly use them all from either one of them.My own short-term wishlist is : Store personal information , like the address book , possibly e-mail and other messages , etc .
mirrored ( synced in real time ) between my mobile phone and a datacenter in a bunker somewhere safe .
I carry my mobile phone around with me all the time , so every desktop should just pick up the data from it .
OTOH , I also need a secure backup if I lose it .
Encryption can solve most of the issues here.Have a high-speed low-range wireless link between my desktop and my phone when I put it on the desk ( or are somewhere in the room ) .
By " high-speed " here I mean " enough to transfer data such as the mentioned address book , e-mail , etc .
" in real-time back and forth .
54 Mbit/s looks " good enough " for this purpose .
I imagine something like Bluetooth on steroids , only less sucky , probably using IPv6 rather than some internal ad-hoc packet formatting .
I want the mobile phone to be a regular network node and that 's where Bluetooth fails .
I also do n't want for the phone batteries not to be excessively drained from using the link , so WiFi also fails.If the mobile phone CPU is strong enough ( and it looks like the new 500 MHz + mobile phones are bordering " enough " ) , run some basic applications on the mobile phone but access it via " remote desktop " ( e.g .
VNC , RDP , whatever ) from the desktop .
Even better , use something like VMWare and similar applications do and make " seamless " integration between the windows of the mobile phone and the " real " desktop , with smart sharing of specific services like audio and phonecalls made from the desktop .
Of course , I do n't want to run big or CPU-intensive applications on the phone , but I imagine something with the capabilities of Word 95 ( remember , it ran on 486 machines with 100 MHz and 4 MB of RAM ) would be fine.Have a long-range low-bandwidth connection for general Internet access ( of course , with fallback to the low-range high-bandwidth one when in range ) , capable of relatively ( from 2009. point of view ) low-bandwidth tasks like streaming standard-def YouTube videos , city-wide.This is what I think I need , YMMV .
Much of these points are very very near of being done already .
The major thing that 's holding the whole concept back is that the cell-phone manufacturers ( or probably more probably , the telcos ) insist that the phones do n't run a general purpose OS that would make it all possible with custom applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not very imaginative to conclude that the ultimate goal of these technologies is to achieve convergence between the various devices, to seamlessly use them all from either one of them.My own short-term wishlist is:
Store personal information, like the address book, possibly e-mail and other messages, etc.
mirrored (synced in real time) between my mobile phone and a datacenter in a bunker somewhere safe.
I carry my mobile phone around with me all the time, so every desktop should just pick up the data from it.
OTOH, I also need a secure backup if I lose it.
Encryption can solve most of the issues here.Have a high-speed low-range wireless link between my desktop and my phone when I put it on the desk (or are somewhere in the room).
By "high-speed" here I mean "enough to transfer data such as the mentioned address book, e-mail, etc.
" in real-time back and forth.
54 Mbit/s looks "good enough" for this purpose.
I imagine something like Bluetooth on steroids, only less sucky, probably using IPv6 rather than some internal ad-hoc packet formatting.
I want the mobile phone to be a regular network node and that's where Bluetooth fails.
I also don't want for the phone batteries not to be excessively drained from using the link, so WiFi also fails.If the mobile phone CPU is strong enough (and it looks like the new 500 MHz+ mobile phones are bordering "enough"), run some basic applications on the mobile phone but access it via "remote desktop" (e.g.
VNC, RDP, whatever) from the desktop.
Even better, use something like VMWare and similar applications do and make "seamless" integration between the windows of the mobile phone and the "real" desktop, with smart sharing of specific services like audio and phonecalls made from the desktop.
Of course, I don't want to run big or CPU-intensive applications on the phone, but I imagine something with the capabilities of Word 95 (remember, it ran on 486 machines with 100 MHz and 4 MB of RAM) would be fine.Have a long-range low-bandwidth connection for general Internet access (of course, with fallback to the low-range high-bandwidth one when in range), capable of relatively (from 2009. point of view) low-bandwidth tasks like streaming standard-def YouTube videos, city-wide.This is what I think I need, YMMV.
Much of these points are very very near of being done already.
The major thing that's holding the whole concept back is that the cell-phone manufacturers (or probably more probably, the telcos) insist that the phones don't run a general purpose OS that would make it all possible with custom applications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28516675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28523551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28525309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28514015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_28_2123204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512575
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507399
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507695
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513479
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509815
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510119
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28523551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508435
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508971
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28517711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28511817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508153
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28513299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28509123
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28514015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28510857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28525309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28508187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28516675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_28_2123204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28507389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_28_2123204.28512451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
