<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_27_1919221</id>
	<title>Microsoft To Offer Windows 7 On USB Thumb Drives?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1246131240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Barence</a> writes <i>"Microsoft is reportedly considering offering <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/258811/microsoft-to-offer-windows-7-on-usb-thumb-drives.html">Windows 7 on USB thumb drives</a> to allow netbook owners to upgrade their machines. Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download. However, netbooks don't have optical drives and the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " Microsoft is reportedly considering offering Windows 7 on USB thumb drives to allow netbook owners to upgrade their machines .
Windows has , until now , only been distributed on DVDs or via download .
However , netbooks do n't have optical drives and the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB , which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer 's broadband data cap .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "Microsoft is reportedly considering offering Windows 7 on USB thumb drives to allow netbook owners to upgrade their machines.
Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download.
However, netbooks don't have optical drives and the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502259</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>crhylove</author>
	<datestamp>1246187400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more format upon which I do not want their bloated, buggy, crappy rerelease of Vista.</p><p>I'll stick with Linux and XP still.  Wake me up when MS pulls their head out of their ass and I don't lose FPS in whatever crap video game I still keep XP around for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more format upon which I do not want their bloated , buggy , crappy rerelease of Vista.I 'll stick with Linux and XP still .
Wake me up when MS pulls their head out of their ass and I do n't lose FPS in whatever crap video game I still keep XP around for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more format upon which I do not want their bloated, buggy, crappy rerelease of Vista.I'll stick with Linux and XP still.
Wake me up when MS pulls their head out of their ass and I don't lose FPS in whatever crap video game I still keep XP around for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498557</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>JobyOne</author>
	<datestamp>1246103400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel Ubuntu's pain in that case, but in the case of Windows I say "fuck them."<br> <br>

If they're charging me hundreds of dollars for software, they aren't allowed to complain about distribution costs, that will only happen if Microsoft were a bunch of greedy assholes...oh wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel Ubuntu 's pain in that case , but in the case of Windows I say " fuck them .
" If they 're charging me hundreds of dollars for software , they are n't allowed to complain about distribution costs , that will only happen if Microsoft were a bunch of greedy assholes...oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel Ubuntu's pain in that case, but in the case of Windows I say "fuck them.
" 

If they're charging me hundreds of dollars for software, they aren't allowed to complain about distribution costs, that will only happen if Microsoft were a bunch of greedy assholes...oh wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497451</id>
	<title>Re:Not so average</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246095540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article to which you are referring is probably <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/05/survey-average-broadband-speed-in-us-is-1-9mbps.ars" title="arstechnica.com">this one</a> [arstechnica.com] It's not quite clear how 1.9 Mbs is the average. Is it a mode, a median, or a mean?</p><p>The paper behind the article includes this gem.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> There are 8 megabits in a megabyte, so a 100 megabit per second connection takes 8 seconds to transmit a 100<br>megabyte file.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article to which you are referring is probably this one [ arstechnica.com ] It 's not quite clear how 1.9 Mbs is the average .
Is it a mode , a median , or a mean ? The paper behind the article includes this gem .
There are 8 megabits in a megabyte , so a 100 megabit per second connection takes 8 seconds to transmit a 100megabyte file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article to which you are referring is probably this one [arstechnica.com] It's not quite clear how 1.9 Mbs is the average.
Is it a mode, a median, or a mean?The paper behind the article includes this gem.
There are 8 megabits in a megabyte, so a 100 megabit per second connection takes 8 seconds to transmit a 100megabyte file.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498179</id>
	<title>Re:I guess that's nice</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1246100460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why? Wouldn't that be a rather expensive way to get a thumb drive? That'd only be a few GB in size.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Would n't that be a rather expensive way to get a thumb drive ?
That 'd only be a few GB in size .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Wouldn't that be a rather expensive way to get a thumb drive?
That'd only be a few GB in size.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497533</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that you mention it, how much would it cost to bulk order 10MB USB flashdrives?  This seems to have a possibility of happening.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that you mention it , how much would it cost to bulk order 10MB USB flashdrives ?
This seems to have a possibility of happening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that you mention it, how much would it cost to bulk order 10MB USB flashdrives?
This seems to have a possibility of happening.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947</id>
	<title>What concerns me the most about this article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas.  It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them.  On Microsoft's front, this is great.  However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.</p><p>If the article had instead mentioned the "new unacceptable limitations being imposed by broadband ISPs" I would see it differently.  Instead it states "...which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.".</p><p>To me, the article writer is already stating that bandwidth caps are here to stay, we lost the war on bandwidth caps, and we should rejoice that Microsoft has plans to overcome these obstacles.</p><p>This is always how major obstacles are overcome when the public cries.</p><p>1.  Proudly display your new 'grand plan' and how it's 'needed' or 'helpful'.<br>2.  Public outcry comes and you dash for cover to avoid being attacked.<br>3.  Bring the program back a little at a time and convince the press (or buy them) into stating your plan as if it is already here and in use.<br>4.  Bring your 'grand plan' to market.  The public is sick of hearing about the negatives of the 'grand plan' and have decided that it WILL happen, there's nothing they can do about it, and should just accept that it is here to stay.</p><p>This happens with MANY things in life...Obama's 'grand' plan for health care, Bush's bailout plans, ISP bandwidth caps... I could make a very long list of things that you can read about that are worded as if they are here already.</p><p>I admit, the article is written with a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits.  But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the news of Microsofts ideas .
It 's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them .
On Microsoft 's front , this is great .
However , this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here , acceptable , and we should just succumb to our limitations.If the article had instead mentioned the " new unacceptable limitations being imposed by broadband ISPs " I would see it differently .
Instead it states " ...which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer 's broadband data cap .
" .To me , the article writer is already stating that bandwidth caps are here to stay , we lost the war on bandwidth caps , and we should rejoice that Microsoft has plans to overcome these obstacles.This is always how major obstacles are overcome when the public cries.1 .
Proudly display your new 'grand plan ' and how it 's 'needed ' or 'helpful'.2 .
Public outcry comes and you dash for cover to avoid being attacked.3 .
Bring the program back a little at a time and convince the press ( or buy them ) into stating your plan as if it is already here and in use.4 .
Bring your 'grand plan ' to market .
The public is sick of hearing about the negatives of the 'grand plan ' and have decided that it WILL happen , there 's nothing they can do about it , and should just accept that it is here to stay.This happens with MANY things in life...Obama 's 'grand ' plan for health care , Bush 's bailout plans , ISP bandwidth caps... I could make a very long list of things that you can read about that are worded as if they are here already.I admit , the article is written with a .uk domain , so maybe the UK already has imposed limits .
But I 've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas.
It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them.
On Microsoft's front, this is great.
However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.If the article had instead mentioned the "new unacceptable limitations being imposed by broadband ISPs" I would see it differently.
Instead it states "...which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.
".To me, the article writer is already stating that bandwidth caps are here to stay, we lost the war on bandwidth caps, and we should rejoice that Microsoft has plans to overcome these obstacles.This is always how major obstacles are overcome when the public cries.1.
Proudly display your new 'grand plan' and how it's 'needed' or 'helpful'.2.
Public outcry comes and you dash for cover to avoid being attacked.3.
Bring the program back a little at a time and convince the press (or buy them) into stating your plan as if it is already here and in use.4.
Bring your 'grand plan' to market.
The public is sick of hearing about the negatives of the 'grand plan' and have decided that it WILL happen, there's nothing they can do about it, and should just accept that it is here to stay.This happens with MANY things in life...Obama's 'grand' plan for health care, Bush's bailout plans, ISP bandwidth caps... I could make a very long list of things that you can read about that are worded as if they are here already.I admit, the article is written with a .uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits.
But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497465</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>TheRealFixer</author>
	<datestamp>1246095600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I recall, Windows 95 was the last one to be distributed on floppy.  I remember installing it, and it was a ridiculous number of floppies. Upwards of 20 I think.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I recall , Windows 95 was the last one to be distributed on floppy .
I remember installing it , and it was a ridiculous number of floppies .
Upwards of 20 I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I recall, Windows 95 was the last one to be distributed on floppy.
I remember installing it, and it was a ridiculous number of floppies.
Upwards of 20 I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497419</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonyme Connard</author>
	<datestamp>1246095360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft is considering <b>offering</b> Windows 7?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft is considering offering Windows 7 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft is considering offering Windows 7?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497123</id>
	<title>It would destroy your USB stick</title>
	<author>SplashMyBandit</author>
	<datestamp>1246093560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>
I'm trying Win7 at the moment. It is simply Vista but with less bad performance. Device compatibility is an issue, it supports fewer devices out-of-the-box than the Ubuntu 9.04 install I put on the same machine. You can use the Vista drivers for most hardware (which is why you know it's actually just a re-branded Vista) but that doesn't always work.</li><li>
One thing I noticed is that my hard drive light it pulsing every few seconds. I wonder whether that is a background indexing service doing its thing? Anyway, given the finite number of writes to a USB drive getting written to every second would destroy your device within months (there are 86400 seconds in a day).
</li><li>
Oh yeah, I haven't installed Windows for a while so I'd forgotten that for the 8GB install you pretty much only get Notepad and Wordpad. Just so lame compared to Linux on a stick.
</li><li>
It is good to see Microsoft making progress in this area, but Windows 7 is usable but still a pretty average product (despite the fanboi hype working overtime).
</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm trying Win7 at the moment .
It is simply Vista but with less bad performance .
Device compatibility is an issue , it supports fewer devices out-of-the-box than the Ubuntu 9.04 install I put on the same machine .
You can use the Vista drivers for most hardware ( which is why you know it 's actually just a re-branded Vista ) but that does n't always work .
One thing I noticed is that my hard drive light it pulsing every few seconds .
I wonder whether that is a background indexing service doing its thing ?
Anyway , given the finite number of writes to a USB drive getting written to every second would destroy your device within months ( there are 86400 seconds in a day ) .
Oh yeah , I have n't installed Windows for a while so I 'd forgotten that for the 8GB install you pretty much only get Notepad and Wordpad .
Just so lame compared to Linux on a stick .
It is good to see Microsoft making progress in this area , but Windows 7 is usable but still a pretty average product ( despite the fanboi hype working overtime ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

I'm trying Win7 at the moment.
It is simply Vista but with less bad performance.
Device compatibility is an issue, it supports fewer devices out-of-the-box than the Ubuntu 9.04 install I put on the same machine.
You can use the Vista drivers for most hardware (which is why you know it's actually just a re-branded Vista) but that doesn't always work.
One thing I noticed is that my hard drive light it pulsing every few seconds.
I wonder whether that is a background indexing service doing its thing?
Anyway, given the finite number of writes to a USB drive getting written to every second would destroy your device within months (there are 86400 seconds in a day).
Oh yeah, I haven't installed Windows for a while so I'd forgotten that for the 8GB install you pretty much only get Notepad and Wordpad.
Just so lame compared to Linux on a stick.
It is good to see Microsoft making progress in this area, but Windows 7 is usable but still a pretty average product (despite the fanboi hype working overtime).
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502861</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246195740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you put Windows 7 on a brand new quad core with 8gb of ram, it is indeed faster than XP running on the top of the line pc back when XP was first released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you put Windows 7 on a brand new quad core with 8gb of ram , it is indeed faster than XP running on the top of the line pc back when XP was first released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you put Windows 7 on a brand new quad core with 8gb of ram, it is indeed faster than XP running on the top of the line pc back when XP was first released.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497937</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's faster than XP. What's not to like about it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's faster than XP .
What 's not to like about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's faster than XP.
What's not to like about it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28505573</id>
	<title>Re:It's Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246215960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow the shit that passes for comedy on this site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow the shit that passes for comedy on this site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow the shit that passes for comedy on this site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497973</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps they mean skinnyband</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1246098900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Typical? Average? This entire discussion is full of shoddy statistics.</p><p>If Microsoft were to eliminate discs entirely, and distribute Windows 7 as a digital download, it would cut off millions of potential customers who use DSL. I know, I know, the average bandwidth "is" 1.9 Mb/s-- larger than the 256K/384K/512K/768K/1.5M DSL variants. But it doesn't mean that those customers don't exist-- if bandwidth was uniformly distributed, those slow lines would still comprise a substantial fraction of broadband connections.</p><p>It's probably not a uniform distribution. I suspect that FIOS, and 99 Mb/s cable brings the average up substantially. Here on slashdot, the average is probably a  bit different--distorted by campus ethernet, perhaps. But the mean is irrelevant. The median and the mode are more important to Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typical ?
Average ? This entire discussion is full of shoddy statistics.If Microsoft were to eliminate discs entirely , and distribute Windows 7 as a digital download , it would cut off millions of potential customers who use DSL .
I know , I know , the average bandwidth " is " 1.9 Mb/s-- larger than the 256K/384K/512K/768K/1.5M DSL variants .
But it does n't mean that those customers do n't exist-- if bandwidth was uniformly distributed , those slow lines would still comprise a substantial fraction of broadband connections.It 's probably not a uniform distribution .
I suspect that FIOS , and 99 Mb/s cable brings the average up substantially .
Here on slashdot , the average is probably a bit different--distorted by campus ethernet , perhaps .
But the mean is irrelevant .
The median and the mode are more important to Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typical?
Average? This entire discussion is full of shoddy statistics.If Microsoft were to eliminate discs entirely, and distribute Windows 7 as a digital download, it would cut off millions of potential customers who use DSL.
I know, I know, the average bandwidth "is" 1.9 Mb/s-- larger than the 256K/384K/512K/768K/1.5M DSL variants.
But it doesn't mean that those customers don't exist-- if bandwidth was uniformly distributed, those slow lines would still comprise a substantial fraction of broadband connections.It's probably not a uniform distribution.
I suspect that FIOS, and 99 Mb/s cable brings the average up substantially.
Here on slashdot, the average is probably a  bit different--distorted by campus ethernet, perhaps.
But the mean is irrelevant.
The median and the mode are more important to Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498957</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1246107300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Slashdot.  We <i>are</i> the firewall Nazis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Slashdot .
We are the firewall Nazis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Slashdot.
We are the firewall Nazis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499325</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1246110300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I called the local cable company, phone company, electric, my cell carrier, and the city hall demanding this... didn't work...  still on a crappy connection with trouble streaming hulu low-q feeds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I called the local cable company , phone company , electric , my cell carrier , and the city hall demanding this... did n't work... still on a crappy connection with trouble streaming hulu low-q feeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I called the local cable company, phone company, electric, my cell carrier, and the city hall demanding this... didn't work...  still on a crappy connection with trouble streaming hulu low-q feeds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497221</id>
	<title>a step in the right direction</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1246094100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think all software should be on those.  If you scratch a USB drive, it still works.  I don't think they have as good of a shelf life but it's not like you'd do a whole ton of I/O on it to kill it quickly.  How often do you reinstall windows?  Some really expensive software like robo-sewer control programs for robotic sewing machines installs off a USB drive and also requires that the USB drive be plugged in to start up the software.  Talk about hard to pirate!  You can't just image the drive either.  It senses the serial number of the drive or something.  Just think if games did this.  They could be totally open with no stupid DRM malware or internet connection required.  Just the USB drive needs to be plugged in and you're good.
Plus, why stop there?  I reeeeeally think Microsoft (and everyone else) should go back to cartridges for video games instead of CD/DVD games.  Then there's basically no size limit, developers just add in a 16GB memory chip instead of 8 if they have a big game.  That worked for the sega genesis and N64.  Plus you can't scratch your cartridge and then have to pay another $60, and they could make the cartridge easily self destructable if anyone opens it to avoid ROMing.  Just make the inside a vacuum and put an air sensor that will release a quick charging capacitor burst that fries all the memory chips if it senses air.  That and put two layers of barely separated copper foil around the inside of the plastic casing and if anyone tries to penetrate it, they touch and complete a circuit that fries the memory.  Flash based memory or basically anything non-optical needs to be implemented for a lot more future technology so I'm all for windows going to it at least!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think all software should be on those .
If you scratch a USB drive , it still works .
I do n't think they have as good of a shelf life but it 's not like you 'd do a whole ton of I/O on it to kill it quickly .
How often do you reinstall windows ?
Some really expensive software like robo-sewer control programs for robotic sewing machines installs off a USB drive and also requires that the USB drive be plugged in to start up the software .
Talk about hard to pirate !
You ca n't just image the drive either .
It senses the serial number of the drive or something .
Just think if games did this .
They could be totally open with no stupid DRM malware or internet connection required .
Just the USB drive needs to be plugged in and you 're good .
Plus , why stop there ?
I reeeeeally think Microsoft ( and everyone else ) should go back to cartridges for video games instead of CD/DVD games .
Then there 's basically no size limit , developers just add in a 16GB memory chip instead of 8 if they have a big game .
That worked for the sega genesis and N64 .
Plus you ca n't scratch your cartridge and then have to pay another $ 60 , and they could make the cartridge easily self destructable if anyone opens it to avoid ROMing .
Just make the inside a vacuum and put an air sensor that will release a quick charging capacitor burst that fries all the memory chips if it senses air .
That and put two layers of barely separated copper foil around the inside of the plastic casing and if anyone tries to penetrate it , they touch and complete a circuit that fries the memory .
Flash based memory or basically anything non-optical needs to be implemented for a lot more future technology so I 'm all for windows going to it at least !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think all software should be on those.
If you scratch a USB drive, it still works.
I don't think they have as good of a shelf life but it's not like you'd do a whole ton of I/O on it to kill it quickly.
How often do you reinstall windows?
Some really expensive software like robo-sewer control programs for robotic sewing machines installs off a USB drive and also requires that the USB drive be plugged in to start up the software.
Talk about hard to pirate!
You can't just image the drive either.
It senses the serial number of the drive or something.
Just think if games did this.
They could be totally open with no stupid DRM malware or internet connection required.
Just the USB drive needs to be plugged in and you're good.
Plus, why stop there?
I reeeeeally think Microsoft (and everyone else) should go back to cartridges for video games instead of CD/DVD games.
Then there's basically no size limit, developers just add in a 16GB memory chip instead of 8 if they have a big game.
That worked for the sega genesis and N64.
Plus you can't scratch your cartridge and then have to pay another $60, and they could make the cartridge easily self destructable if anyone opens it to avoid ROMing.
Just make the inside a vacuum and put an air sensor that will release a quick charging capacitor burst that fries all the memory chips if it senses air.
That and put two layers of barely separated copper foil around the inside of the plastic casing and if anyone tries to penetrate it, they touch and complete a circuit that fries the memory.
Flash based memory or basically anything non-optical needs to be implemented for a lot more future technology so I'm all for windows going to it at least!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502277</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>mochan\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1246187820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!</p></div></blockquote><p>Though flash drives list no specs other than the size, there are a lot of variables. I think a flash drive used for software distribution could be optimized for low price that it would suffer on writing or have the writing circuit totally removed to make it only possible to read from.

</p><p>These flash drives would make for as good a removable storage as CDs made for coasters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives .
Then we all win ! Though flash drives list no specs other than the size , there are a lot of variables .
I think a flash drive used for software distribution could be optimized for low price that it would suffer on writing or have the writing circuit totally removed to make it only possible to read from .
These flash drives would make for as good a removable storage as CDs made for coasters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives.
Then we all win!Though flash drives list no specs other than the size, there are a lot of variables.
I think a flash drive used for software distribution could be optimized for low price that it would suffer on writing or have the writing circuit totally removed to make it only possible to read from.
These flash drives would make for as good a removable storage as CDs made for coasters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501779</id>
	<title>In some countries download caps are the norm</title>
	<author>Bunyip Redgum</author>
	<datestamp>1246221360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Download caps are the norm for many ISPs in Australia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Download caps are the norm for many ISPs in Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Download caps are the norm for many ISPs in Australia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498499</id>
	<title>Re:It's Amazing</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1246103040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone has a big box of working 128 meg and 256 meg thumb drives to sell, please email larryish-near-gmail-dot-com</p><p>I am willing to pay on delivery, or trade out some tasty bits and bobs that I have in the workshop.</p><p>Sorry for the off-topic post, but I need a few dozen small USB sticks for an electronics project and haven't been able to find any on eBay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone has a big box of working 128 meg and 256 meg thumb drives to sell , please email larryish-near-gmail-dot-comI am willing to pay on delivery , or trade out some tasty bits and bobs that I have in the workshop.Sorry for the off-topic post , but I need a few dozen small USB sticks for an electronics project and have n't been able to find any on eBay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone has a big box of working 128 meg and 256 meg thumb drives to sell, please email larryish-near-gmail-dot-comI am willing to pay on delivery, or trade out some tasty bits and bobs that I have in the workshop.Sorry for the off-topic post, but I need a few dozen small USB sticks for an electronics project and haven't been able to find any on eBay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</id>
	<title>not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download"

Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary states " Windows has , until now , only been distributed on DVDs or via download " Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD 's , 3.5 , or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download"

Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497603</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where can I get this service in South Africa? We pay more than that for 384kbps DSL with a 3GB cap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where can I get this service in South Africa ?
We pay more than that for 384kbps DSL with a 3GB cap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where can I get this service in South Africa?
We pay more than that for 384kbps DSL with a 3GB cap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497379</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>GreatBunzinni</author>
	<datestamp>1246095060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not a new idea at all. <a href="http://www2.mandriva.com/linux/flash/" title="mandriva.com">Mandriva</a> [mandriva.com] already does that and it has been doing that for years. I mean, since the days of Mandrake 9.2, I believe. That means since the days of Ubuntu 5.04, now that it appears that everything linux has been somehow reduced and limited to Ubuntu.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a new idea at all .
Mandriva [ mandriva.com ] already does that and it has been doing that for years .
I mean , since the days of Mandrake 9.2 , I believe .
That means since the days of Ubuntu 5.04 , now that it appears that everything linux has been somehow reduced and limited to Ubuntu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a new idea at all.
Mandriva [mandriva.com] already does that and it has been doing that for years.
I mean, since the days of Mandrake 9.2, I believe.
That means since the days of Ubuntu 5.04, now that it appears that everything linux has been somehow reduced and limited to Ubuntu.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498325</id>
	<title>Re:If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>n1hilist</author>
	<datestamp>1246101600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and have Developers! coming out of my arse?</p><p>No thanks. Besides, Ubuntu is already brown and it installs from USB just fine.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and have Developers !
coming out of my arse ? No thanks .
Besides , Ubuntu is already brown and it installs from USB just fine .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and have Developers!
coming out of my arse?No thanks.
Besides, Ubuntu is already brown and it installs from USB just fine.
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498475</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>that this is not und</author>
	<datestamp>1246102860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows 98 could be ordered on 3-1/2" floppies.  A lot more than 20 of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 98 could be ordered on 3-1/2 " floppies .
A lot more than 20 of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 98 could be ordered on 3-1/2" floppies.
A lot more than 20 of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28526021</id>
	<title>i-Flapp is better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246361580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great stuff Microsoft. But i-Flapp is doing this already. And it&#226;(TM)s only $10. I use it all the time, so there&#226;(TM)s no way that I&#226;(TM)m gonna pay extra to upgrade to Windows 7 now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great stuff Microsoft .
But i-Flapp is doing this already .
And it   ( TM ) s only $ 10 .
I use it all the time , so there   ( TM ) s no way that I   ( TM ) m gon na pay extra to upgrade to Windows 7 now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great stuff Microsoft.
But i-Flapp is doing this already.
And itâ(TM)s only $10.
I use it all the time, so thereâ(TM)s no way that Iâ(TM)m gonna pay extra to upgrade to Windows 7 now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497697</id>
	<title>Easy solution to this problem: Bribe fw nazi</title>
	<author>scottv67</author>
	<datestamp>1246096920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.</i> <br> <br>
There is an easy solution to this problem: if you don't have a decent connection at home, download the ISO at work.  Check with your company's firewall nazi (that's one of the hats I wear during the day).  See if he/she objects to you downloading that ISO or if company policy prohibits this type of download.  If you ask nicely, the firewall nazi will probably find a way to download that ISO image rather quickly and you won't have to worry about burning up your bandwidth cap at home or waiting five days for the download at home to finish.  If you mention something like, "Hey, I heard you like Five Guys.  Can I buy you a burger and fries sometime?" as you hand the USB drive to the fw nazi, he/she will be much more receptive to your request.  It's all in how you ask.  Am I going to download a copy of the latest Star Trek movie for you (even if some free F.G. is on the line)? *No.*  Would I download an ISO from Microsoft for you if you ask in a pleasant tone?  Probably.  Also, the chances are good that I have already downloaded that ISO for my own testing or someone who sits near me at work has a copy of that ISO.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB , which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer 's broadband data cap .
There is an easy solution to this problem : if you do n't have a decent connection at home , download the ISO at work .
Check with your company 's firewall nazi ( that 's one of the hats I wear during the day ) .
See if he/she objects to you downloading that ISO or if company policy prohibits this type of download .
If you ask nicely , the firewall nazi will probably find a way to download that ISO image rather quickly and you wo n't have to worry about burning up your bandwidth cap at home or waiting five days for the download at home to finish .
If you mention something like , " Hey , I heard you like Five Guys .
Can I buy you a burger and fries sometime ?
" as you hand the USB drive to the fw nazi , he/she will be much more receptive to your request .
It 's all in how you ask .
Am I going to download a copy of the latest Star Trek movie for you ( even if some free F.G. is on the line ) ?
* No. * Would I download an ISO from Microsoft for you if you ask in a pleasant tone ?
Probably. Also , the chances are good that I have already downloaded that ISO for my own testing or someone who sits near me at work has a copy of that ISO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the Windows 7 ISO weighs in at 2.3GB, which would take several hours to download on an average broadband connection and potentially do serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.
There is an easy solution to this problem: if you don't have a decent connection at home, download the ISO at work.
Check with your company's firewall nazi (that's one of the hats I wear during the day).
See if he/she objects to you downloading that ISO or if company policy prohibits this type of download.
If you ask nicely, the firewall nazi will probably find a way to download that ISO image rather quickly and you won't have to worry about burning up your bandwidth cap at home or waiting five days for the download at home to finish.
If you mention something like, "Hey, I heard you like Five Guys.
Can I buy you a burger and fries sometime?
" as you hand the USB drive to the fw nazi, he/she will be much more receptive to your request.
It's all in how you ask.
Am I going to download a copy of the latest Star Trek movie for you (even if some free F.G. is on the line)?
*No.*  Would I download an ISO from Microsoft for you if you ask in a pleasant tone?
Probably.  Also, the chances are good that I have already downloaded that ISO for my own testing or someone who sits near me at work has a copy of that ISO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498301</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1246101420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!</p></div></blockquote><p>Until you find out they are read-only.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives .
Then we all win ! Until you find out they are read-only .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives.
Then we all win!Until you find out they are read-only.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</id>
	<title>If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>stox</author>
	<datestamp>1246098060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would offer Windows 7 in a convenient suppository.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would offer Windows 7 in a convenient suppository .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would offer Windows 7 in a convenient suppository.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497337</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>karnal</author>
	<datestamp>1246094760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.pendrivelinux.com/" title="pendrivelinux.com">http://www.pendrivelinux.com/</a> [pendrivelinux.com]</p><p>Pen Drive Linux to the rescue!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.pendrivelinux.com/ [ pendrivelinux.com ] Pen Drive Linux to the rescue ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.pendrivelinux.com/ [pendrivelinux.com]Pen Drive Linux to the rescue!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499665</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1246112700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be like floppy disks once were - they were cheap and plentiful enough that you could give them to someone and not have to worry about getting it back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be like floppy disks once were - they were cheap and plentiful enough that you could give them to someone and not have to worry about getting it back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be like floppy disks once were - they were cheap and plentiful enough that you could give them to someone and not have to worry about getting it back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501717</id>
	<title>Re:What concerns me the most about this article...</title>
	<author>beuges</author>
	<datestamp>1246219860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I just mentioned in another post, in South Africa, I pay around $15 for 2GB of data <i>per month</i>. That's excluding line rental. After that, its around $9-$10/GB. Fastest home DSL line speed available is officially 1MB/s, going up to 4MB/s depending on your line quality and distance from the exchange.<br>Local bandwidth (connecting to South African hosts) is dirt cheap, but international is pretty much daylight robbery. The US has the benefit that most datacenters are hosted in the US already, and the US also has a huge number of undersea cables running from all over the coastlines to Europe and Asia where most of the rest of the internet is hosted. The <i>whole of Africa</i> has a tiny number of cables, meaning that internet access is hideously expensive.</p><p><a href="http://www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/270808ECO\_glasvezel\_170984a.jpg" title="www.nrc.nl">http://www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/270808ECO\_glasvezel\_170984a.jpg</a> [www.nrc.nl]<br><a href="http://www.telegeography.com/products/map\_cable/images/Cable\_Map\_big.gif" title="telegeography.com">http://www.telegeography.com/products/map\_cable/images/Cable\_Map\_big.gif</a> [telegeography.com]</p><p>It always amuses me that people from the US complain when their ISPs threaten to impose 100GB/month caps. You guys have absolutely no idea how lucky you are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I just mentioned in another post , in South Africa , I pay around $ 15 for 2GB of data per month .
That 's excluding line rental .
After that , its around $ 9- $ 10/GB .
Fastest home DSL line speed available is officially 1MB/s , going up to 4MB/s depending on your line quality and distance from the exchange.Local bandwidth ( connecting to South African hosts ) is dirt cheap , but international is pretty much daylight robbery .
The US has the benefit that most datacenters are hosted in the US already , and the US also has a huge number of undersea cables running from all over the coastlines to Europe and Asia where most of the rest of the internet is hosted .
The whole of Africa has a tiny number of cables , meaning that internet access is hideously expensive.http : //www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/270808ECO \ _glasvezel \ _170984a.jpg [ www.nrc.nl ] http : //www.telegeography.com/products/map \ _cable/images/Cable \ _Map \ _big.gif [ telegeography.com ] It always amuses me that people from the US complain when their ISPs threaten to impose 100GB/month caps .
You guys have absolutely no idea how lucky you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I just mentioned in another post, in South Africa, I pay around $15 for 2GB of data per month.
That's excluding line rental.
After that, its around $9-$10/GB.
Fastest home DSL line speed available is officially 1MB/s, going up to 4MB/s depending on your line quality and distance from the exchange.Local bandwidth (connecting to South African hosts) is dirt cheap, but international is pretty much daylight robbery.
The US has the benefit that most datacenters are hosted in the US already, and the US also has a huge number of undersea cables running from all over the coastlines to Europe and Asia where most of the rest of the internet is hosted.
The whole of Africa has a tiny number of cables, meaning that internet access is hideously expensive.http://www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/270808ECO\_glasvezel\_170984a.jpg [www.nrc.nl]http://www.telegeography.com/products/map\_cable/images/Cable\_Map\_big.gif [telegeography.com]It always amuses me that people from the US complain when their ISPs threaten to impose 100GB/month caps.
You guys have absolutely no idea how lucky you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497047</id>
	<title>Booting is a big pro Linux argument</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246136220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux can boot from everything and doesn't have arcane configuration or environment requirements for doing so. It can run from RAM and read-only devices without cutting back functionality. The Windows boot process is full of dependencies, convoluted and badly documented.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux can boot from everything and does n't have arcane configuration or environment requirements for doing so .
It can run from RAM and read-only devices without cutting back functionality .
The Windows boot process is full of dependencies , convoluted and badly documented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux can boot from everything and doesn't have arcane configuration or environment requirements for doing so.
It can run from RAM and read-only devices without cutting back functionality.
The Windows boot process is full of dependencies, convoluted and badly documented.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497855</id>
	<title>Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft?</title>
	<author>thunderclap</author>
	<datestamp>1246097940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am sorry but the netbook would not be the thing I would be thinking of shooting if I went over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sorry but the netbook would not be the thing I would be thinking of shooting if I went over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sorry but the netbook would not be the thing I would be thinking of shooting if I went over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499805</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>theaceoffire</author>
	<datestamp>1246113900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> <i>"They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized..."</i> </b> <br> <br>

^\_^ Actually, it did. Grab the most recent copy of Ubuntu on a live CD, boot into it, go to "System", "Administration", and click "USB Startup Disk Creator". <br> <br>

It takes ANY ISO and makes a USB bootable with it. Have used it already, worked great for installing to an EEE.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion , but alas , it never materialized... " ^ \ _ ^ Actually , it did .
Grab the most recent copy of Ubuntu on a live CD , boot into it , go to " System " , " Administration " , and click " USB Startup Disk Creator " .
It takes ANY ISO and makes a USB bootable with it .
Have used it already , worked great for installing to an EEE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized..."   

^\_^ Actually, it did.
Grab the most recent copy of Ubuntu on a live CD, boot into it, go to "System", "Administration", and click "USB Startup Disk Creator".
It takes ANY ISO and makes a USB bootable with it.
Have used it already, worked great for installing to an EEE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497891</id>
	<title>Smart idea, but an even better idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246098120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is to also have a Live mode that won't even require to be installed on the hosts machine.<br>2 sticks in one, one containing the main system files, read-only, the other being your user space.<br>It's not like it would be hard to pull off, and the cost won't be that much more if you keep the sizes low. (and you can always offer larger ones too)<br>Having a Win7 Live would be useful if you screwed up your machine and need to do some repairs and/or backups if the repair attempts fail.</p><p>I have a WinXP live just in case i screw things up, as well as UBCD, several diagnostic tools and so on.  All in one beautiful disc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Starting off at 1gig and going up.<br>Could be used to carry your most important files around, or all if you end up getting one of the larger ones and don't use a lot.<br>Just out of interest, are there any companies out there who make things like this?  One part read only (with switch?) and another read/write? Such a thing would be incredibly useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is to also have a Live mode that wo n't even require to be installed on the hosts machine.2 sticks in one , one containing the main system files , read-only , the other being your user space.It 's not like it would be hard to pull off , and the cost wo n't be that much more if you keep the sizes low .
( and you can always offer larger ones too ) Having a Win7 Live would be useful if you screwed up your machine and need to do some repairs and/or backups if the repair attempts fail.I have a WinXP live just in case i screw things up , as well as UBCD , several diagnostic tools and so on .
All in one beautiful disc .
: ) Starting off at 1gig and going up.Could be used to carry your most important files around , or all if you end up getting one of the larger ones and do n't use a lot.Just out of interest , are there any companies out there who make things like this ?
One part read only ( with switch ?
) and another read/write ?
Such a thing would be incredibly useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is to also have a Live mode that won't even require to be installed on the hosts machine.2 sticks in one, one containing the main system files, read-only, the other being your user space.It's not like it would be hard to pull off, and the cost won't be that much more if you keep the sizes low.
(and you can always offer larger ones too)Having a Win7 Live would be useful if you screwed up your machine and need to do some repairs and/or backups if the repair attempts fail.I have a WinXP live just in case i screw things up, as well as UBCD, several diagnostic tools and so on.
All in one beautiful disc.
:)Starting off at 1gig and going up.Could be used to carry your most important files around, or all if you end up getting one of the larger ones and don't use a lot.Just out of interest, are there any companies out there who make things like this?
One part read only (with switch?
) and another read/write?
Such a thing would be incredibly useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496887</id>
	<title>Pirated USBs</title>
	<author>Tippu</author>
	<datestamp>1246135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if there any pirated USB sniffing dogs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there any pirated USB sniffing dogs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there any pirated USB sniffing dogs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498509</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>JobyOne</author>
	<datestamp>1246103100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well whoop-de-doo for you!  Aren't you special.  Most of us (even in my metro area of 850,000) have nowhere near options like that.<br> <br>

Most of us would pay for a capped (or slow) connection because it's better than nothing at all.  Not all of us are as privileged as you.<br> <br>

Personally I pay $50 for 5/1 (thankfully uncapped), because that's the best option I have available.  I remember living in a rural area where my only option was 28.8 (on a good day) dailup.  That was only about 6-8 years ago, too.  Try expressing a little gratitude for what you've been given by the world, and try not to have such an overblown sense of entitlement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well whoop-de-doo for you !
Are n't you special .
Most of us ( even in my metro area of 850,000 ) have nowhere near options like that .
Most of us would pay for a capped ( or slow ) connection because it 's better than nothing at all .
Not all of us are as privileged as you .
Personally I pay $ 50 for 5/1 ( thankfully uncapped ) , because that 's the best option I have available .
I remember living in a rural area where my only option was 28.8 ( on a good day ) dailup .
That was only about 6-8 years ago , too .
Try expressing a little gratitude for what you 've been given by the world , and try not to have such an overblown sense of entitlement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well whoop-de-doo for you!
Aren't you special.
Most of us (even in my metro area of 850,000) have nowhere near options like that.
Most of us would pay for a capped (or slow) connection because it's better than nothing at all.
Not all of us are as privileged as you.
Personally I pay $50 for 5/1 (thankfully uncapped), because that's the best option I have available.
I remember living in a rural area where my only option was 28.8 (on a good day) dailup.
That was only about 6-8 years ago, too.
Try expressing a little gratitude for what you've been given by the world, and try not to have such an overblown sense of entitlement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497159</id>
	<title>Re:Not so average</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246093800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And all that is still pretty low considering my home connection is currently pulling 27mbps downstream</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And all that is still pretty low considering my home connection is currently pulling 27mbps downstream</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all that is still pretty low considering my home connection is currently pulling 27mbps downstream</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</id>
	<title>Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246093620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion. I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable. Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.</p><p>My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out. No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.</p><p>And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc. A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.</p><p>They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a related note , several years back , I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion .
I asked them for " Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives " , installable via a simple Windows executable .
Double click the executable , choose your USB flash drive , and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out .
No need to burn a disc first ( burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users ) , no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer , etc.And since USB flash drives are read/write , you could even let them update packages , save documents , etc .
A much better , more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion , but alas , it never materialized.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion.
I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable.
Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out.
No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc.
A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>TW Burger</author>
	<datestamp>1246098900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I installed the Win7 Beta on a netbook as a test. It works surprising well (Vista did not,  XP or Linux far better than Win7), except the video is screwed up for high end graphics applications like those silly new games that require the graphics capacity of a combined Pixar and Dreamworks production.

One more more thing: Use mofo or some other less offensive term. The rest of us are able to maintain etiquette even when anonymously corresponding on line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed the Win7 Beta on a netbook as a test .
It works surprising well ( Vista did not , XP or Linux far better than Win7 ) , except the video is screwed up for high end graphics applications like those silly new games that require the graphics capacity of a combined Pixar and Dreamworks production .
One more more thing : Use mofo or some other less offensive term .
The rest of us are able to maintain etiquette even when anonymously corresponding on line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed the Win7 Beta on a netbook as a test.
It works surprising well (Vista did not,  XP or Linux far better than Win7), except the video is screwed up for high end graphics applications like those silly new games that require the graphics capacity of a combined Pixar and Dreamworks production.
One more more thing: Use mofo or some other less offensive term.
The rest of us are able to maintain etiquette even when anonymously corresponding on line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497251</id>
	<title>Re:Not so average</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246094280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets play with some numbers.  To be considered a broadband connection it has to be at least 256 Kb/sec. This works to about 32 KB/sec.<br>2.3 GB then would take almost 21 hours. 512Kb = 10.5 hours, 1024 = 5.25 hours, etc. (you can see the pattern)<br>Yeah, that would take a while. Even my home connection(5Mbit, so I'm going to call that 5000 Kb/sec (which I have held solid for a few hours at slightly above 600KB/sec) ) would be 1.1 hours. Still awfully long depending on if it was able to hold that the entire time.</p><p>Plus, 2.3GB is probably the full thing.  Odds are they aren't going to install every thing (do you really need drivers for every video card they have for the initial install? You might just need the bare minimum for video and then get the drivers from the manufacturer's site post-install.  Same thing with sound, network, chipset, etc).  Then if you get (I haven't looked at the types of Win7, so using the Vista names) Home Basic, you are not going to have lots of things that they do have in the other versions, so you are going to have a much smaller initial install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets play with some numbers .
To be considered a broadband connection it has to be at least 256 Kb/sec .
This works to about 32 KB/sec.2.3 GB then would take almost 21 hours .
512Kb = 10.5 hours , 1024 = 5.25 hours , etc .
( you can see the pattern ) Yeah , that would take a while .
Even my home connection ( 5Mbit , so I 'm going to call that 5000 Kb/sec ( which I have held solid for a few hours at slightly above 600KB/sec ) ) would be 1.1 hours .
Still awfully long depending on if it was able to hold that the entire time.Plus , 2.3GB is probably the full thing .
Odds are they are n't going to install every thing ( do you really need drivers for every video card they have for the initial install ?
You might just need the bare minimum for video and then get the drivers from the manufacturer 's site post-install .
Same thing with sound , network , chipset , etc ) .
Then if you get ( I have n't looked at the types of Win7 , so using the Vista names ) Home Basic , you are not going to have lots of things that they do have in the other versions , so you are going to have a much smaller initial install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets play with some numbers.
To be considered a broadband connection it has to be at least 256 Kb/sec.
This works to about 32 KB/sec.2.3 GB then would take almost 21 hours.
512Kb = 10.5 hours, 1024 = 5.25 hours, etc.
(you can see the pattern)Yeah, that would take a while.
Even my home connection(5Mbit, so I'm going to call that 5000 Kb/sec (which I have held solid for a few hours at slightly above 600KB/sec) ) would be 1.1 hours.
Still awfully long depending on if it was able to hold that the entire time.Plus, 2.3GB is probably the full thing.
Odds are they aren't going to install every thing (do you really need drivers for every video card they have for the initial install?
You might just need the bare minimum for video and then get the drivers from the manufacturer's site post-install.
Same thing with sound, network, chipset, etc).
Then if you get (I haven't looked at the types of Win7, so using the Vista names) Home Basic, you are not going to have lots of things that they do have in the other versions, so you are going to have a much smaller initial install.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499037</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>Lennie</author>
	<datestamp>1246108020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who ever said that ? I've never seen it mentioned anywhere that 7 is faster than XP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who ever said that ?
I 've never seen it mentioned anywhere that 7 is faster than XP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who ever said that ?
I've never seen it mentioned anywhere that 7 is faster than XP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497625</id>
	<title>Whoa!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Downloading Windows 7 for free, burning to a DVD and installing was a surreal enough experience already!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Downloading Windows 7 for free , burning to a DVD and installing was a surreal enough experience already !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Downloading Windows 7 for free, burning to a DVD and installing was a surreal enough experience already!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497783</id>
	<title>Re:It's Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And Microsoft chases <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/1243255/OLPC-Fork-Sugar-On-a-Stick-Goes-10?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">OLPC once again</a> [slashdot.org].</p></div><p>Regarding MSFT chasing OLPC...not. Microsoft has been experimenting with putting Windows on USB sticks for a few years. The only question for them is whether it makes business sense. OLPC is hardly innovating in this regard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And Microsoft chases OLPC once again [ slashdot.org ] .Regarding MSFT chasing OLPC...not .
Microsoft has been experimenting with putting Windows on USB sticks for a few years .
The only question for them is whether it makes business sense .
OLPC is hardly innovating in this regard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Microsoft chases OLPC once again [slashdot.org].Regarding MSFT chasing OLPC...not.
Microsoft has been experimenting with putting Windows on USB sticks for a few years.
The only question for them is whether it makes business sense.
OLPC is hardly innovating in this regard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497345</id>
	<title>If so, how about distributing a KVM/VMWARE image?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246094820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, save us the trouble!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , save us the trouble !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, save us the trouble!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498595</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>that this is not und</author>
	<datestamp>1246103700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a $120,000 house that is over 100 years old and on 5 acres of land, including a mini-orchard.  I paid less for my home probably in part because I live in an area where I can't get 100/100 for $15/month.</p><p>All I have is DSL although a local provider sells a directional RF beam connection for about $30 a month.</p><p>I'm pretty happy with what I've got going here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a $ 120,000 house that is over 100 years old and on 5 acres of land , including a mini-orchard .
I paid less for my home probably in part because I live in an area where I ca n't get 100/100 for $ 15/month.All I have is DSL although a local provider sells a directional RF beam connection for about $ 30 a month.I 'm pretty happy with what I 've got going here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a $120,000 house that is over 100 years old and on 5 acres of land, including a mini-orchard.
I paid less for my home probably in part because I live in an area where I can't get 100/100 for $15/month.All I have is DSL although a local provider sells a directional RF beam connection for about $30 a month.I'm pretty happy with what I've got going here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497377</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1246095060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isnt this more or less what you wanted?

<p> <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html" title="ubuntu.com">https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html</a> [ubuntu.com] <br>
<a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick" title="ubuntu.com">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick</a> [ubuntu.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Isnt this more or less what you wanted ?
https : //help.ubuntu.com/9.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html [ ubuntu.com ] https : //help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick [ ubuntu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isnt this more or less what you wanted?
https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html [ubuntu.com] 
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick [ubuntu.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498227</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1246100820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm paying $29 for 1.5Mb.  I think that's more typical in the US, <i>if</i> broadband is available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm paying $ 29 for 1.5Mb .
I think that 's more typical in the US , if broadband is available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm paying $29 for 1.5Mb.
I think that's more typical in the US, if broadband is available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510967</id>
	<title>Re:If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1246307220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weren't you paying attention? They just did</htmltext>
<tokenext>Were n't you paying attention ?
They just did</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weren't you paying attention?
They just did</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498563</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246103460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion. I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable. Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.</p><p>My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out. No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.</p><p>And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc. A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.</p><p>They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...</p></div><p>Actually, ROM USBs do exist; I work part-time at Office Depot we've had a few preloaded with demo prints for Brother printers (supplied by Brother themselves) in the past. The files show up when the Flash drive is plugged in a PC, but will not delete or move (they copy, of course). I actually assumed by default that MS would be using this for flash-based W7 delivery.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a related note , several years back , I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion .
I asked them for " Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives " , installable via a simple Windows executable .
Double click the executable , choose your USB flash drive , and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out .
No need to burn a disc first ( burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users ) , no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer , etc.And since USB flash drives are read/write , you could even let them update packages , save documents , etc .
A much better , more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion , but alas , it never materialized...Actually , ROM USBs do exist ; I work part-time at Office Depot we 've had a few preloaded with demo prints for Brother printers ( supplied by Brother themselves ) in the past .
The files show up when the Flash drive is plugged in a PC , but will not delete or move ( they copy , of course ) .
I actually assumed by default that MS would be using this for flash-based W7 delivery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a related note, several years back, I emailed Ubuntu with a product suggestion.
I asked them for "Ubuntu on USB Flash Drives", installable via a simple Windows executable.
Double click the executable, choose your USB flash drive, and it would install on the USB flash drive and just work.My thought was that it would make it much easier for Windows users that are curious about Linux to try it out.
No need to burn a disc first (burning discs can be complicated for non-technical users), no need to boot from the optical drive to get into the Ubuntu installer, etc.And since USB flash drives are read/write, you could even let them update packages, save documents, etc.
A much better, more realistic experience than a read-only test drive of Ubuntu on CD.They very kindly replied thanking me for the suggestion, but alas, it never materialized...Actually, ROM USBs do exist; I work part-time at Office Depot we've had a few preloaded with demo prints for Brother printers (supplied by Brother themselves) in the past.
The files show up when the Flash drive is plugged in a PC, but will not delete or move (they copy, of course).
I actually assumed by default that MS would be using this for flash-based W7 delivery.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501655</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>beuges</author>
	<datestamp>1246132440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in south africa, that $15/month gives me a 2GB cap per month. That excludes the line rental - only data. And the fastest DSL line speed is officially 1MB/s but it goes up to 4MB/s if you're lucky. It's another $9-$10 per GB after that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in south africa , that $ 15/month gives me a 2GB cap per month .
That excludes the line rental - only data .
And the fastest DSL line speed is officially 1MB/s but it goes up to 4MB/s if you 're lucky .
It 's another $ 9- $ 10 per GB after that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in south africa, that $15/month gives me a 2GB cap per month.
That excludes the line rental - only data.
And the fastest DSL line speed is officially 1MB/s but it goes up to 4MB/s if you're lucky.
It's another $9-$10 per GB after that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497311</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>mariushm</author>
	<datestamp>1246094640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>USB drives are still more expensive and heavier compared to CDs.. They can easily order 50.000 cd's cheaply... When they offered Ubuntu for free, they were practically begging people to request up to 10 discs at once and give the ones they don't need to friends because the shipping costs were higher than the costs of manufacturing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>USB drives are still more expensive and heavier compared to CDs.. They can easily order 50.000 cd 's cheaply... When they offered Ubuntu for free , they were practically begging people to request up to 10 discs at once and give the ones they do n't need to friends because the shipping costs were higher than the costs of manufacturing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>USB drives are still more expensive and heavier compared to CDs.. They can easily order 50.000 cd's cheaply... When they offered Ubuntu for free, they were practically begging people to request up to 10 discs at once and give the ones they don't need to friends because the shipping costs were higher than the costs of manufacturing them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499743</id>
	<title>Re:It's Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246113300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I put a FULLY INSTALLED Ubuntu 9.04 on a stick awhile back.  Here's how to do it.  http://pkill-9.com/wordpress/?p=51</p><p>Secure, portable operating system.</p><p>Wayno</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I put a FULLY INSTALLED Ubuntu 9.04 on a stick awhile back .
Here 's how to do it .
http : //pkill-9.com/wordpress/ ? p = 51Secure , portable operating system.Wayno</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put a FULLY INSTALLED Ubuntu 9.04 on a stick awhile back.
Here's how to do it.
http://pkill-9.com/wordpress/?p=51Secure, portable operating system.Wayno</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497297</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246094580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download" Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.</i></p><p>IIRC, MS Office was offered on floppies as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary states " Windows has , until now , only been distributed on DVDs or via download " Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD 's , 3.5 , or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.IIRC , MS Office was offered on floppies as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary states "Windows has, until now, only been distributed on DVDs or via download" Calling BS , raise your hand if you remember windows on CD's, 3.5, or floppy... Windows has been distributed ion many methods.IIRC, MS Office was offered on floppies as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501863</id>
	<title>Re:What concerns me the most about this article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246179780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck sakes, what a little whiny brat.  What are you, 12?.  So, an ISP should simply permit you to download as much as you want 24/7?  How many businesses have you operated?  You do realise (yes, realise is with 's', not 'z') an ISP is a business right?  They too are required to pay bills, pay for bandwidth, invest in infrastructure, pay dividends, etc.</p><p>How many times have you walked into a restaurant and were allowed to eat whatever the fuck you wanted for a flat fee?<br>Walk out of a shop with as much produce/clothing/stuff as you could carry for a flat fee?<br>Use as much electricity as you wanted for a flat flee?<br>Use all the apartments on your floor for the price of a single apartment?<br>Get a years supply of petrol (yes, you fucking dummy, it's petrol, not "gas" which is the stuff you breath or pass out your ass) for the price of a tank.<br>Watch as many movies as you wanted for the price of a single ticket.<br>et fucking cetera.</p><p>How is bandwidth/traffic consumption any different to any other commodity?  It costs actual money to provide, is finite.  Did you get that last word?</p><p>Maybe if I put it in terms you can wrap your mind around:  when was the last time you worked at a job for a year and were paid for a single day only?</p><p>There's something wrong with the youth today, they seem to think society and businesses owe them everything and they're *entitled* to get it for free.  If they can't get it for free, then they're being denied what's rightfully theirs and the organisation which dares to charge them for usage is evil.</p><p>You can't have it both ways.  Capitalism and socialism do not mix well.  Either accept that things cost money in the free world (and that you are welcome to shop around), or continue to whine like a child and accept that adults will laugh at you.</p><p>Or fuckoff to China or North Korea and go goose step with the rest of them and get all your bandwidth for free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck sakes , what a little whiny brat .
What are you , 12 ? .
So , an ISP should simply permit you to download as much as you want 24/7 ?
How many businesses have you operated ?
You do realise ( yes , realise is with 's ' , not 'z ' ) an ISP is a business right ?
They too are required to pay bills , pay for bandwidth , invest in infrastructure , pay dividends , etc.How many times have you walked into a restaurant and were allowed to eat whatever the fuck you wanted for a flat fee ? Walk out of a shop with as much produce/clothing/stuff as you could carry for a flat fee ? Use as much electricity as you wanted for a flat flee ? Use all the apartments on your floor for the price of a single apartment ? Get a years supply of petrol ( yes , you fucking dummy , it 's petrol , not " gas " which is the stuff you breath or pass out your ass ) for the price of a tank.Watch as many movies as you wanted for the price of a single ticket.et fucking cetera.How is bandwidth/traffic consumption any different to any other commodity ?
It costs actual money to provide , is finite .
Did you get that last word ? Maybe if I put it in terms you can wrap your mind around : when was the last time you worked at a job for a year and were paid for a single day only ? There 's something wrong with the youth today , they seem to think society and businesses owe them everything and they 're * entitled * to get it for free .
If they ca n't get it for free , then they 're being denied what 's rightfully theirs and the organisation which dares to charge them for usage is evil.You ca n't have it both ways .
Capitalism and socialism do not mix well .
Either accept that things cost money in the free world ( and that you are welcome to shop around ) , or continue to whine like a child and accept that adults will laugh at you.Or fuckoff to China or North Korea and go goose step with the rest of them and get all your bandwidth for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck sakes, what a little whiny brat.
What are you, 12?.
So, an ISP should simply permit you to download as much as you want 24/7?
How many businesses have you operated?
You do realise (yes, realise is with 's', not 'z') an ISP is a business right?
They too are required to pay bills, pay for bandwidth, invest in infrastructure, pay dividends, etc.How many times have you walked into a restaurant and were allowed to eat whatever the fuck you wanted for a flat fee?Walk out of a shop with as much produce/clothing/stuff as you could carry for a flat fee?Use as much electricity as you wanted for a flat flee?Use all the apartments on your floor for the price of a single apartment?Get a years supply of petrol (yes, you fucking dummy, it's petrol, not "gas" which is the stuff you breath or pass out your ass) for the price of a tank.Watch as many movies as you wanted for the price of a single ticket.et fucking cetera.How is bandwidth/traffic consumption any different to any other commodity?
It costs actual money to provide, is finite.
Did you get that last word?Maybe if I put it in terms you can wrap your mind around:  when was the last time you worked at a job for a year and were paid for a single day only?There's something wrong with the youth today, they seem to think society and businesses owe them everything and they're *entitled* to get it for free.
If they can't get it for free, then they're being denied what's rightfully theirs and the organisation which dares to charge them for usage is evil.You can't have it both ways.
Capitalism and socialism do not mix well.
Either accept that things cost money in the free world (and that you are welcome to shop around), or continue to whine like a child and accept that adults will laugh at you.Or fuckoff to China or North Korea and go goose step with the rest of them and get all your bandwidth for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500737</id>
	<title>Windows ISO size</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1246121580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been wondering for some time if the Windows ISO size now was because of the way the Vista installer works now.  Supposedly it uses a disk image that it just copies over before the final configuration.</p><p>However, the same install disc is used for Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate.  I doubt that's changed with Windows 7.</p><p>Each of these being their own separate image would explain the file size...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been wondering for some time if the Windows ISO size now was because of the way the Vista installer works now .
Supposedly it uses a disk image that it just copies over before the final configuration.However , the same install disc is used for Vista Home Basic , Vista Home Premium , Vista Business , and Vista Ultimate .
I doubt that 's changed with Windows 7.Each of these being their own separate image would explain the file size.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been wondering for some time if the Windows ISO size now was because of the way the Vista installer works now.
Supposedly it uses a disk image that it just copies over before the final configuration.However, the same install disc is used for Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate.
I doubt that's changed with Windows 7.Each of these being their own separate image would explain the file size...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501785</id>
	<title>Re:If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246221420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>juz remember to remove the plastic packaging before inserting into receptacle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>juz remember to remove the plastic packaging before inserting into receptacle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>juz remember to remove the plastic packaging before inserting into receptacle...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498319</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives == Mandriva Linux</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1246101600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you should try Mandriva Flash.

BTW, all Mandriva ISOs can run directly from a USB stick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you should try Mandriva Flash .
BTW , all Mandriva ISOs can run directly from a USB stick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you should try Mandriva Flash.
BTW, all Mandriva ISOs can run directly from a USB stick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497097</id>
	<title>Perhaps they mean skinnyband</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246093320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...not broadband.</p><p>Even if it was a full DVD-R (about 4.7G), we'd be talking an hour or two with typical broadband.</p><p>And if your prohibits you from 5G of download in a day, then I hope you don't pay too much for it.  That's a piddly amount of download.  I probably blow through about that much per day on an average day, with perhaps triple that on a day when I'm actually interested in something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...not broadband.Even if it was a full DVD-R ( about 4.7G ) , we 'd be talking an hour or two with typical broadband.And if your prohibits you from 5G of download in a day , then I hope you do n't pay too much for it .
That 's a piddly amount of download .
I probably blow through about that much per day on an average day , with perhaps triple that on a day when I 'm actually interested in something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...not broadband.Even if it was a full DVD-R (about 4.7G), we'd be talking an hour or two with typical broadband.And if your prohibits you from 5G of download in a day, then I hope you don't pay too much for it.
That's a piddly amount of download.
I probably blow through about that much per day on an average day, with perhaps triple that on a day when I'm actually interested in something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499331</id>
	<title>Win7 install option</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246110360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there any reason you can't use an external optical drive to install Win7 on a netbook?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any reason you ca n't use an external optical drive to install Win7 on a netbook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any reason you can't use an external optical drive to install Win7 on a netbook?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510483</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>boss\_hog</author>
	<datestamp>1246216380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure if you care, since it's not Ubuntu directly, but Fedora has done this for at least the past 6-12 months.  They have since version 9: <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/" title="fedorahosted.org" rel="nofollow">https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/</a> [fedorahosted.org]</p><p>you might be able to use an ubuntu livecd image with it...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if you care , since it 's not Ubuntu directly , but Fedora has done this for at least the past 6-12 months .
They have since version 9 : https : //fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/ [ fedorahosted.org ] you might be able to use an ubuntu livecd image with it... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if you care, since it's not Ubuntu directly, but Fedora has done this for at least the past 6-12 months.
They have since version 9: https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/ [fedorahosted.org]you might be able to use an ubuntu livecd image with it...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502315</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246188360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!</p></div><p>Why would anyone need <i>that</i> many thumb drives?</p></div><p>Some geek you are. Yeesh.</p><p>By order if the elder geek counsel, turn in your geek credentials, hat, commiserative pen, pocket protector, starbucks mug, star trek slogan shirt, and Underwear at the door.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives .
Then we all win ! Why would anyone need that many thumb drives ? Some geek you are .
Yeesh.By order if the elder geek counsel , turn in your geek credentials , hat , commiserative pen , pocket protector , starbucks mug , star trek slogan shirt , and Underwear at the door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives.
Then we all win!Why would anyone need that many thumb drives?Some geek you are.
Yeesh.By order if the elder geek counsel, turn in your geek credentials, hat, commiserative pen, pocket protector, starbucks mug, star trek slogan shirt, and Underwear at the door.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</id>
	<title>It's Amazing</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1246134900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's amazing what kind of viruses you find on USB sticks these days!  <br> <br>

And Microsoft chases <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/24/1243255/OLPC-Fork-Sugar-On-a-Stick-Goes-10?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">OLPC once again</a> [slashdot.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing what kind of viruses you find on USB sticks these days !
And Microsoft chases OLPC once again [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing what kind of viruses you find on USB sticks these days!
And Microsoft chases OLPC once again [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498445</id>
	<title>Re:If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246102620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes instead of these humiliating discs !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes instead of these humiliating discs ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes instead of these humiliating discs !!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498121</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246099980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's a floppy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a floppy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a floppy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502601</id>
	<title>Re:Not so average</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1246192320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Broadband" in the US is generally defined as "better than 200kbps" and no, I haven't misplaced a 0 in there. Dual ISDN counts as broadband. Crappy 768kbps DSL counts as broadband. you get the picture.</p><p>On a connection like that - and they are very, very common - downloading even a smallish DVD image (like the 32-bit Win7<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.iso) will take much of a day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Broadband " in the US is generally defined as " better than 200kbps " and no , I have n't misplaced a 0 in there .
Dual ISDN counts as broadband .
Crappy 768kbps DSL counts as broadband .
you get the picture.On a connection like that - and they are very , very common - downloading even a smallish DVD image ( like the 32-bit Win7 .iso ) will take much of a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Broadband" in the US is generally defined as "better than 200kbps" and no, I haven't misplaced a 0 in there.
Dual ISDN counts as broadband.
Crappy 768kbps DSL counts as broadband.
you get the picture.On a connection like that - and they are very, very common - downloading even a smallish DVD image (like the 32-bit Win7 .iso) will take much of a day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497623</id>
	<title>Too bad you will have to keep it plugged in...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DRM anyone? "W7 have not been able to detect a valid dongel" Please plug it in or call Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DRM anyone ?
" W7 have not been able to detect a valid dongel " Please plug it in or call Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DRM anyone?
"W7 have not been able to detect a valid dongel" Please plug it in or call Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497735</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>nickspoon</author>
	<datestamp>1246097160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's great for <i>you</i>; the majority of us can't get that sort of speed, and certainly for not that sort of money. The maximum reasonable broadband speed where I live (semi-rural UK) is 8/1. There are companies which do offer fibre to some places now, but you're looking at &#194;&pound;50/mo for 50/50, with 'Fair Use'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's great for you ; the majority of us ca n't get that sort of speed , and certainly for not that sort of money .
The maximum reasonable broadband speed where I live ( semi-rural UK ) is 8/1 .
There are companies which do offer fibre to some places now , but you 're looking at     50/mo for 50/50 , with 'Fair Use' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's great for you; the majority of us can't get that sort of speed, and certainly for not that sort of money.
The maximum reasonable broadband speed where I live (semi-rural UK) is 8/1.
There are companies which do offer fibre to some places now, but you're looking at Â£50/mo for 50/50, with 'Fair Use'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499251</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1246109700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok I demand fiber for $15/month!</p><p>What's that? You say my only options for broadband are Verizon, Comcast and Clearwire? And none have fiber? And their cheapest plans for fiber are twice that, monthly?</p><p>Look, assuming you're talking about American dollars (thus, located in the US), you must realize that your situation is unique. The vast majority of the population doesn't have the ISP option you have. Whatever it is-- since you didn't share your provider, I suppose you could just be bullshitting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok I demand fiber for $ 15/month ! What 's that ?
You say my only options for broadband are Verizon , Comcast and Clearwire ?
And none have fiber ?
And their cheapest plans for fiber are twice that , monthly ? Look , assuming you 're talking about American dollars ( thus , located in the US ) , you must realize that your situation is unique .
The vast majority of the population does n't have the ISP option you have .
Whatever it is-- since you did n't share your provider , I suppose you could just be bullshitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok I demand fiber for $15/month!What's that?
You say my only options for broadband are Verizon, Comcast and Clearwire?
And none have fiber?
And their cheapest plans for fiber are twice that, monthly?Look, assuming you're talking about American dollars (thus, located in the US), you must realize that your situation is unique.
The vast majority of the population doesn't have the ISP option you have.
Whatever it is-- since you didn't share your provider, I suppose you could just be bullshitting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28503467</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1246201440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately I expect the drives will be read-only, otherwise it would be a support nightmare.</p><p>You can actually install Vista from a USB drive without any hacks. On a quick flash drive it is much faster than from DVD. You can do it with XP too, but it requires special USB drivers that cannot be legally obtained without a copy of Server 2003.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately I expect the drives will be read-only , otherwise it would be a support nightmare.You can actually install Vista from a USB drive without any hacks .
On a quick flash drive it is much faster than from DVD .
You can do it with XP too , but it requires special USB drivers that can not be legally obtained without a copy of Server 2003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately I expect the drives will be read-only, otherwise it would be a support nightmare.You can actually install Vista from a USB drive without any hacks.
On a quick flash drive it is much faster than from DVD.
You can do it with XP too, but it requires special USB drivers that cannot be legally obtained without a copy of Server 2003.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28506045</id>
	<title>broadband data cap</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1246219260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><em>... serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap."</em> </p><p>
I'm all for this.
</p><p>
I think it's Microsoft's civic duty to encourage buyers of Windows 7 to <b>download it</b>
</p><p>
If for no reason than discouraging ISPs adopting outrageously small broadband caps.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... serious damage to a customer 's broadband data cap .
" I 'm all for this .
I think it 's Microsoft 's civic duty to encourage buyers of Windows 7 to download it If for no reason than discouraging ISPs adopting outrageously small broadband caps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... serious damage to a customer's broadband data cap.
" 
I'm all for this.
I think it's Microsoft's civic duty to encourage buyers of Windows 7 to download it

If for no reason than discouraging ISPs adopting outrageously small broadband caps.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498529</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin</title>
	<author>that this is not und</author>
	<datestamp>1246103220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The codeword is 'captured.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The codeword is 'captured .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The codeword is 'captured.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497941</id>
	<title>Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1246098600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are. Or at least a lot of flash drives have a write protect switch that could be soldered closed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are .
Or at least a lot of flash drives have a write protect switch that could be soldered closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are.
Or at least a lot of flash drives have a write protect switch that could be soldered closed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498187</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin</title>
	<author>ubersoldat2k7</author>
	<datestamp>1246100520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, people doesn't learn from their mistakes. I give two years until Win7 is crippling with crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , people does n't learn from their mistakes .
I give two years until Win7 is crippling with crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, people doesn't learn from their mistakes.
I give two years until Win7 is crippling with crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497549</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1246096140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not if they send out 64 MB thumb drives.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p><p>By the way: Does this still happen in reality? I haven't seen their CDs for a decade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if they send out 64 MB thumb drives .
: PBy the way : Does this still happen in reality ?
I have n't seen their CDs for a decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if they send out 64 MB thumb drives.
:PBy the way: Does this still happen in reality?
I haven't seen their CDs for a decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497609</id>
	<title>Hardware bases copyright protection.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am surprised that they have not tried something like this sooner seeing as it really paves the way to a hardware based copyright protection system.  How hard would it be to place some kind of Microcontroller on or add firmware to a smart USB controller which records information about the system that it is being installed to and prevents the number of installs before it refuses to allow access to the stored data.  It would also be make it much easier to embed the product key into the product itself.  If this system information and product key information where unaddressable over the USB bus, it could make a hardware based copyright system that is non-trivial to overcome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised that they have not tried something like this sooner seeing as it really paves the way to a hardware based copyright protection system .
How hard would it be to place some kind of Microcontroller on or add firmware to a smart USB controller which records information about the system that it is being installed to and prevents the number of installs before it refuses to allow access to the stored data .
It would also be make it much easier to embed the product key into the product itself .
If this system information and product key information where unaddressable over the USB bus , it could make a hardware based copyright system that is non-trivial to overcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised that they have not tried something like this sooner seeing as it really paves the way to a hardware based copyright protection system.
How hard would it be to place some kind of Microcontroller on or add firmware to a smart USB controller which records information about the system that it is being installed to and prevents the number of installs before it refuses to allow access to the stored data.
It would also be make it much easier to embed the product key into the product itself.
If this system information and product key information where unaddressable over the USB bus, it could make a hardware based copyright system that is non-trivial to overcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28504637</id>
	<title>Re:I guess that's nice</title>
	<author>inject\_hotmail.com</author>
	<datestamp>1246210320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Honestly, I would expect not.  It would be nice, but, I'm sure it would be read-only, to maintain the integrity of the OS's files.  Ya know, so viruses couldn't infect "known good" original files.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , I would expect not .
It would be nice , but , I 'm sure it would be read-only , to maintain the integrity of the OS 's files .
Ya know , so viruses could n't infect " known good " original files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, I would expect not.
It would be nice, but, I'm sure it would be read-only, to maintain the integrity of the OS's files.
Ya know, so viruses couldn't infect "known good" original files.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496985</id>
	<title>Windows Live Live Distro finally means something</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite. Nevermind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait , that 'll never make them bite .
Nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite.
Nevermind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</id>
	<title>Not so average</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1246135800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's taking someone (in the US) "several hours" to download 2+ GB with their "average broadband connection", then they don't have an "average broadband connection". There is some debate about what the average broadband speed actually is in the US, but even the low end is 1.9mbps (that was from an Ars Technica back in <b>2007</b> - surely it's faster by now). Let's take the midrange, again from back in 2007, of 4.8mbps. That makes a 2.3GB download take little more than one hour. Even if congestion slows ones speed by half, that only about 2.5 hours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's taking someone ( in the US ) " several hours " to download 2 + GB with their " average broadband connection " , then they do n't have an " average broadband connection " .
There is some debate about what the average broadband speed actually is in the US , but even the low end is 1.9mbps ( that was from an Ars Technica back in 2007 - surely it 's faster by now ) .
Let 's take the midrange , again from back in 2007 , of 4.8mbps .
That makes a 2.3GB download take little more than one hour .
Even if congestion slows ones speed by half , that only about 2.5 hours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's taking someone (in the US) "several hours" to download 2+ GB with their "average broadband connection", then they don't have an "average broadband connection".
There is some debate about what the average broadband speed actually is in the US, but even the low end is 1.9mbps (that was from an Ars Technica back in 2007 - surely it's faster by now).
Let's take the midrange, again from back in 2007, of 4.8mbps.
That makes a 2.3GB download take little more than one hour.
Even if congestion slows ones speed by half, that only about 2.5 hours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502439</id>
	<title>Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft?</title>
	<author>Amphetam1ne</author>
	<datestamp>1246190220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meanwhile on the other side of MS, they're just about to start offering streaming 1080p movies on demand over Xbox Live. So that's a minimum of 9GB being consumed in under 2 hours. They obviously don't care about your cap that much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile on the other side of MS , they 're just about to start offering streaming 1080p movies on demand over Xbox Live .
So that 's a minimum of 9GB being consumed in under 2 hours .
They obviously do n't care about your cap that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile on the other side of MS, they're just about to start offering streaming 1080p movies on demand over Xbox Live.
So that's a minimum of 9GB being consumed in under 2 hours.
They obviously don't care about your cap that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</id>
	<title>Somebody is thinking at Microsoft?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246136220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who hired them and how long do you think they will last at Microsoft?  hohoho<br>
<br>
Ok, being serious.  It makes sense.  With Time Warner slapping draconian download caps on those poor people in Texas, a USB flash drive for OS distribution in a growing netbook market shows some...slight...thinking ahead of the curve.  Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it?  Oh man.  I would shoot my netbook. <br>
<br>
Kudos to whomever pulled this rabbit out of the hat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who hired them and how long do you think they will last at Microsoft ?
hohoho Ok , being serious .
It makes sense .
With Time Warner slapping draconian download caps on those poor people in Texas , a USB flash drive for OS distribution in a growing netbook market shows some...slight...thinking ahead of the curve .
Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it ?
Oh man .
I would shoot my netbook .
Kudos to whomever pulled this rabbit out of the hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who hired them and how long do you think they will last at Microsoft?
hohoho

Ok, being serious.
It makes sense.
With Time Warner slapping draconian download caps on those poor people in Texas, a USB flash drive for OS distribution in a growing netbook market shows some...slight...thinking ahead of the curve.
Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it?
Oh man.
I would shoot my netbook.
Kudos to whomever pulled this rabbit out of the hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498081</id>
	<title>Clever bastards</title>
	<author>edcheevy</author>
	<datestamp>1246099740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Realistically, who isn't going to delete the W7 files off the USB drive when they're done so they can use it for other things?  Should you ever need to reinstall, you'll have to buy another one.  A clever win/win for Microsoft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Realistically , who is n't going to delete the W7 files off the USB drive when they 're done so they can use it for other things ?
Should you ever need to reinstall , you 'll have to buy another one .
A clever win/win for Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Realistically, who isn't going to delete the W7 files off the USB drive when they're done so they can use it for other things?
Should you ever need to reinstall, you'll have to buy another one.
A clever win/win for Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28526163</id>
	<title>You don't have to wait for Microsoft Windows 7</title>
	<author>geekspeak09</author>
	<datestamp>1246363680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not big news when there is a product like i-Flapp that lets you port your applications and settings from one system to another even if the other system does not have the software loaded. You can buy this now and do not have to wait until October for Microsoft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not big news when there is a product like i-Flapp that lets you port your applications and settings from one system to another even if the other system does not have the software loaded .
You can buy this now and do not have to wait until October for Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not big news when there is a product like i-Flapp that lets you port your applications and settings from one system to another even if the other system does not have the software loaded.
You can buy this now and do not have to wait until October for Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496919</id>
	<title>Good.</title>
	<author>revxul</author>
	<datestamp>1246135260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this is a very good idea.</p><p>Reusable FTW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is a very good idea.Reusable FTW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is a very good idea.Reusable FTW!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497019</id>
	<title>ROM drives possible?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is possible to have this on ROM drive?  Has anything like that been tried?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is possible to have this on ROM drive ?
Has anything like that been tried ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is possible to have this on ROM drive?
Has anything like that been tried?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28525311</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>rolfc</author>
	<datestamp>1246395000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Flamebait?

You must be jealous<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flamebait ?
You must be jealous ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flamebait?
You must be jealous ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28505287</id>
	<title>Will Win7 be a "live System" like Knoppix?</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1246214220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will I be able to run Win7 from the thumb drive, just like a fully installed Win7? Or will the thumb drive Win7 do nothing expect install Win7 on my hdd?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will I be able to run Win7 from the thumb drive , just like a fully installed Win7 ?
Or will the thumb drive Win7 do nothing expect install Win7 on my hdd ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will I be able to run Win7 from the thumb drive, just like a fully installed Win7?
Or will the thumb drive Win7 do nothing expect install Win7 on my hdd?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881</id>
	<title>Idiots.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoever installs <b>Windows 7</b> on a goddamn <b>netbook</b> is a <b>dumb, dumb motherfucker</b>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever installs Windows 7 on a goddamn netbook is a dumb , dumb motherfucker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever installs Windows 7 on a goddamn netbook is a dumb, dumb motherfucker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>gsmalleus</author>
	<datestamp>1246101780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!</p></div><p>Why would anyone need <i>that</i> many thumb drives?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives .
Then we all win ! Why would anyone need that many thumb drives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives.
Then we all win!Why would anyone need that many thumb drives?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498009</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>anjilslaire</author>
	<datestamp>1246099200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed. XP &amp; 2003 came on single CDs</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
XP &amp; 2003 came on single CDs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
XP &amp; 2003 came on single CDs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501379</id>
	<title>Re:I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>MagusSlurpy</author>
	<datestamp>1246128240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now all we need is old Iron Eyes Cody to be standing by the highway, crying over a pile of USB sticks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need is old Iron Eyes Cody to be standing by the highway , crying over a pile of USB sticks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need is old Iron Eyes Cody to be standing by the highway, crying over a pile of USB sticks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28506823</id>
	<title>Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246182420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it? Oh man. I would shoot my netbook.</p></div><p>Whom should be shot in this scenario? Your ISP thats who!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it ?
Oh man .
I would shoot my netbook.Whom should be shot in this scenario ?
Your ISP thats who !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you imagine the ire of not only having to download a 3.5GB OS onto a netbook but if you actually run over your cap and get charged EXTRA for it?
Oh man.
I would shoot my netbook.Whom should be shot in this scenario?
Your ISP thats who!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497327</id>
	<title>Holla if Jacko sucked your underage cock!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246094700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey hey hey!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey hey hey ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey hey hey!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497741</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1246097220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month. Don't pay for slow and capped connections. Demand what you want</p></div><p>From whom in the United States? And how do you connect when outside your home?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15 $ /month .
Do n't pay for slow and capped connections .
Demand what you wantFrom whom in the United States ?
And how do you connect when outside your home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month.
Don't pay for slow and capped connections.
Demand what you wantFrom whom in the United States?
And how do you connect when outside your home?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937</id>
	<title>I encourage this trend</title>
	<author>chebucto</author>
	<datestamp>1246135320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives. Then we all win!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives .
Then we all win !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to convince AOL to start sending out their software on thumb drives.
Then we all win!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498455</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>that this is not und</author>
	<datestamp>1246102740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have Windows 98 on 3-1/2" floppies.  It's a huge pile.  I've never opened it.  The way to get it was to buy the full 'retail box' ('Install on any new PC') version of Windows 98.  There was a coupon inside the manual that came with it to order the diskette set for a nominal fee.  I think it was $10.  Then they by mistake shipped me two copies.</p><p>I have Windows 95 on 5-1/4" floppies, too.  Another thing you had to order.  It ended up being handy because you copy all of the files off the floppies into a folder, burn it to a CD, and get the most bare-bones version of Windows 95, and one that installs without prompting for a CD key.  The 3-1/2" version prompts for user info and then 'fingerprints' the install media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Windows 98 on 3-1/2 " floppies .
It 's a huge pile .
I 've never opened it .
The way to get it was to buy the full 'retail box ' ( 'Install on any new PC ' ) version of Windows 98 .
There was a coupon inside the manual that came with it to order the diskette set for a nominal fee .
I think it was $ 10 .
Then they by mistake shipped me two copies.I have Windows 95 on 5-1/4 " floppies , too .
Another thing you had to order .
It ended up being handy because you copy all of the files off the floppies into a folder , burn it to a CD , and get the most bare-bones version of Windows 95 , and one that installs without prompting for a CD key .
The 3-1/2 " version prompts for user info and then 'fingerprints ' the install media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Windows 98 on 3-1/2" floppies.
It's a huge pile.
I've never opened it.
The way to get it was to buy the full 'retail box' ('Install on any new PC') version of Windows 98.
There was a coupon inside the manual that came with it to order the diskette set for a nominal fee.
I think it was $10.
Then they by mistake shipped me two copies.I have Windows 95 on 5-1/4" floppies, too.
Another thing you had to order.
It ended up being handy because you copy all of the files off the floppies into a folder, burn it to a CD, and get the most bare-bones version of Windows 95, and one that installs without prompting for a CD key.
The 3-1/2" version prompts for user info and then 'fingerprints' the install media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510163</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>The End Of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1246213440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cunt. Motherfucker. Cum dripping from your father's anus.</p><p>There, be offended.  Also, welcome to the internet. Your old-fashioned oppressive ideas of etiquette are meaningless here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cunt .
Motherfucker. Cum dripping from your father 's anus.There , be offended .
Also , welcome to the internet .
Your old-fashioned oppressive ideas of etiquette are meaningless here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cunt.
Motherfucker. Cum dripping from your father's anus.There, be offended.
Also, welcome to the internet.
Your old-fashioned oppressive ideas of etiquette are meaningless here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497521</id>
	<title>Duh?</title>
	<author>anti-human 1</author>
	<datestamp>1246096020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assumed the summary meant WIRELESS Broadband data plans?  The mention of "broadband data cap", I thought, indicated this.  Netbooks, after all, are intended to be portable, on the go machines; many of which bundle data plans for subsidizing costs on the computer itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assumed the summary meant WIRELESS Broadband data plans ?
The mention of " broadband data cap " , I thought , indicated this .
Netbooks , after all , are intended to be portable , on the go machines ; many of which bundle data plans for subsidizing costs on the computer itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assumed the summary meant WIRELESS Broadband data plans?
The mention of "broadband data cap", I thought, indicated this.
Netbooks, after all, are intended to be portable, on the go machines; many of which bundle data plans for subsidizing costs on the computer itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497303</id>
	<title>Re:It would destroy your USB stick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246094580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why what do you get off a Linux stick besides Wordpad and Notepad?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why what do you get off a Linux stick besides Wordpad and Notepad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why what do you get off a Linux stick besides Wordpad and Notepad?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496913</id>
	<title>AC To Offer Advice On Sticking Thumb Up Your Ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because if you are really this excited about installing another not-yet-ready-for-prime-time Microsoft OS on your netbook, you really need to stuff a thumb up your ass (after removing Bill Gate's semi-flaccid cock)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because if you are really this excited about installing another not-yet-ready-for-prime-time Microsoft OS on your netbook , you really need to stuff a thumb up your ass ( after removing Bill Gate 's semi-flaccid cock )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because if you are really this excited about installing another not-yet-ready-for-prime-time Microsoft OS on your netbook, you really need to stuff a thumb up your ass (after removing Bill Gate's semi-flaccid cock)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497677</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246096860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fedora has had a LiveUSB creator for a while now.  You can easily choose how much space to give to persistent storage.  It works in Windows and Linux.  As a side note, I have used it to create Ubuntu LiveUSB keys as well.</p><p>https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fedora has had a LiveUSB creator for a while now .
You can easily choose how much space to give to persistent storage .
It works in Windows and Linux .
As a side note , I have used it to create Ubuntu LiveUSB keys as well.https : //fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fedora has had a LiveUSB creator for a while now.
You can easily choose how much space to give to persistent storage.
It works in Windows and Linux.
As a side note, I have used it to create Ubuntu LiveUSB keys as well.https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497895</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>dotgain</author>
	<datestamp>1246098180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, I leech my employer's OC48 and the cost to me is $0/month.  Great for me, but it doesn't mean I can just tell everyone to do the same.  Most geeks have less trouble getting sex than a satisfactory internet hook-up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I leech my employer 's OC48 and the cost to me is $ 0/month .
Great for me , but it does n't mean I can just tell everyone to do the same .
Most geeks have less trouble getting sex than a satisfactory internet hook-up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I leech my employer's OC48 and the cost to me is $0/month.
Great for me, but it doesn't mean I can just tell everyone to do the same.
Most geeks have less trouble getting sex than a satisfactory internet hook-up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499995</id>
	<title>Re:not to be a douche...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246115460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PackRat Alert: yeah, I still own my original win3.1 floppies.  All housed with other swantiques (like an original wildcat bbs) in a Faraday-shielded ammo box.  I wouldn't call BS, but can we not take it for granted that there soon won't be anything like a Windows Start-Up Disk any longer and perhaps the thumbdrive could serve that purpose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PackRat Alert : yeah , I still own my original win3.1 floppies .
All housed with other swantiques ( like an original wildcat bbs ) in a Faraday-shielded ammo box .
I would n't call BS , but can we not take it for granted that there soon wo n't be anything like a Windows Start-Up Disk any longer and perhaps the thumbdrive could serve that purpose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PackRat Alert: yeah, I still own my original win3.1 floppies.
All housed with other swantiques (like an original wildcat bbs) in a Faraday-shielded ammo box.
I wouldn't call BS, but can we not take it for granted that there soon won't be anything like a Windows Start-Up Disk any longer and perhaps the thumbdrive could serve that purpose?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500307</id>
	<title>Re:What concerns me the most about this article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246118280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas.  It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them.  On Microsoft's front, this is great.  However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.</p><p>I admit, the article is written with a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits.  But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.</p></div><p>Bandwidth caps already are here, and acceptable, in many places around the world that aren't the US. I always have to roll my eyes when I see an American bitching and whining like spoiled children about not being able to to absolutely everything without any kind of limitation. Bandwidth caps <i>are</i> a reality, just not one that's caught up to the average American yet... but they will.</p><p>And honestly, they can be a little frustrating at times, but they're not the end of the fucking world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the news of Microsofts ideas .
It 's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them .
On Microsoft 's front , this is great .
However , this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here , acceptable , and we should just succumb to our limitations.I admit , the article is written with a .uk domain , so maybe the UK already has imposed limits .
But I 've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.Bandwidth caps already are here , and acceptable , in many places around the world that are n't the US .
I always have to roll my eyes when I see an American bitching and whining like spoiled children about not being able to to absolutely everything without any kind of limitation .
Bandwidth caps are a reality , just not one that 's caught up to the average American yet... but they will.And honestly , they can be a little frustrating at times , but they 're not the end of the fucking world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the news of Microsofts ideas.
It's that the article already makes the assumption that you have bandwidth caps and Microsoft is having to work around them.
On Microsoft's front, this is great.
However, this just reeks of society accepting that bandwidth caps are here, acceptable, and we should just succumb to our limitations.I admit, the article is written with a .uk domain, so maybe the UK already has imposed limits.
But I've seen wording here in the USA making statements implying everyone in the USA has bandwidth caps and we should all run and check them regularly.Bandwidth caps already are here, and acceptable, in many places around the world that aren't the US.
I always have to roll my eyes when I see an American bitching and whining like spoiled children about not being able to to absolutely everything without any kind of limitation.
Bandwidth caps are a reality, just not one that's caught up to the average American yet... but they will.And honestly, they can be a little frustrating at times, but they're not the end of the fucking world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500699</id>
	<title>Re:If they were really on the ball</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246121340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the reboot time on that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the reboot time on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the reboot time on that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498651</id>
	<title>Re:I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246104180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this.  If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.</p></div><p>They exist:</p><p>See reply to http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1284401&amp;cid=28497433</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this .
If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.They exist : See reply to http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1284401&amp;cid = 28497433</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this.
If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.They exist:See reply to http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1284401&amp;cid=28497433
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433</id>
	<title>I've wondered why there are no usb ROM disks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246095420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this.  If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this .
If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that a usb ROM would make a ton of sense for things like this.
If not USB than SD cards - as these are becoming fairly ubiquitous pretty quickly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498959</id>
	<title>Re:Why would anyone want to buy a capped connectio</title>
	<author>Michael Meissner</author>
	<datestamp>1246107300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good for you.  As the other posters have mentioned, this isn't available to everybody.  For example, I had a T-1 connection to my house when I was a work at home programmer, and the rate was $400/month.  It was the only high speed connection available to me at the time (no cable, and we are too far from the central office for DSL, but because T-1 is regulated, the phone company has to provide it wherever it provides a landline).  Well, the T-1 bill would have jumped to $700/month starting next month, and we decided that enough was enough, and cancelled the service.

Right now, my only options are 3G networking (Sprint and Verizon) or satellite (hughes/wildblue), both of which have bandwidth caps.  Both Sprint and Verizon offer service with 5 gigabytes/month service, and seem to be a much better deal than satellite.  I went with Sprint, because my neighbors have been using it for a bit.  It is fast enough that I can get a VPN connection to work, though the upload speeds and ping latencies are a little slower than I had with the T-1.

In theory, Verizon Fios will be here within the year, and I hoping to get business class service from them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for you .
As the other posters have mentioned , this is n't available to everybody .
For example , I had a T-1 connection to my house when I was a work at home programmer , and the rate was $ 400/month .
It was the only high speed connection available to me at the time ( no cable , and we are too far from the central office for DSL , but because T-1 is regulated , the phone company has to provide it wherever it provides a landline ) .
Well , the T-1 bill would have jumped to $ 700/month starting next month , and we decided that enough was enough , and cancelled the service .
Right now , my only options are 3G networking ( Sprint and Verizon ) or satellite ( hughes/wildblue ) , both of which have bandwidth caps .
Both Sprint and Verizon offer service with 5 gigabytes/month service , and seem to be a much better deal than satellite .
I went with Sprint , because my neighbors have been using it for a bit .
It is fast enough that I can get a VPN connection to work , though the upload speeds and ping latencies are a little slower than I had with the T-1 .
In theory , Verizon Fios will be here within the year , and I hoping to get business class service from them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for you.
As the other posters have mentioned, this isn't available to everybody.
For example, I had a T-1 connection to my house when I was a work at home programmer, and the rate was $400/month.
It was the only high speed connection available to me at the time (no cable, and we are too far from the central office for DSL, but because T-1 is regulated, the phone company has to provide it wherever it provides a landline).
Well, the T-1 bill would have jumped to $700/month starting next month, and we decided that enough was enough, and cancelled the service.
Right now, my only options are 3G networking (Sprint and Verizon) or satellite (hughes/wildblue), both of which have bandwidth caps.
Both Sprint and Verizon offer service with 5 gigabytes/month service, and seem to be a much better deal than satellite.
I went with Sprint, because my neighbors have been using it for a bit.
It is fast enough that I can get a VPN connection to work, though the upload speeds and ping latencies are a little slower than I had with the T-1.
In theory, Verizon Fios will be here within the year, and I hoping to get business class service from them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501305</id>
	<title>Re:Not so average</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1246127280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except that the Windows 7 default 64bit install starts as a 4GB DVD, but balloons out to a 20GB on-disk size. And that's not including an office suite and so on, like Linux distros do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that the Windows 7 default 64bit install starts as a 4GB DVD , but balloons out to a 20GB on-disk size .
And that 's not including an office suite and so on , like Linux distros do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that the Windows 7 default 64bit install starts as a 4GB DVD, but balloons out to a 20GB on-disk size.
And that's not including an office suite and so on, like Linux distros do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497763</id>
	<title>You Fail 1t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246097400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">won't be shouting Another troubled Already aware, *hBSD and exciting; visions going Comprehensive</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>wo n't be shouting Another troubled Already aware , * hBSD and exciting ; visions going Comprehensive [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>won't be shouting Another troubled Already aware, *hBSD and exciting; visions going Comprehensive [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507</id>
	<title>Why would anyone want to buy a capped connection?</title>
	<author>rolfc</author>
	<datestamp>1246095900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month. Don't pay for slow and capped connections. Demand what you want</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15 $ /month .
Do n't pay for slow and capped connections .
Demand what you want</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 100/100 fiber in to my livingroom for 15$/month.
Don't pay for slow and capped connections.
Demand what you want</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497777</id>
	<title>Slackware install from USB</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you are going to upgrade, get <a href="http://www.slackware.com/~alien/tools/usbinstall/12.0/" title="slackware.com" rel="nofollow">the good stuff</a> [slackware.com]</p><p>Utterly painless dual boot on my 900HA.  wireless was the only thing I needed to tweek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are going to upgrade , get the good stuff [ slackware.com ] Utterly painless dual boot on my 900HA .
wireless was the only thing I needed to tweek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are going to upgrade, get the good stuff [slackware.com]Utterly painless dual boot on my 900HA.
wireless was the only thing I needed to tweek.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499653</id>
	<title>Re:Linux on USB Flash Drives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246112580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should look at "unetbootin"  (http://lubi.sourceforge.net/unetbootin.html) which will put a linux "liveCD" onto a usb flash drive sow that you can boot and run without ever having to burn a CD (it can use a downloaded ISO image) or it will download it when running (for those that can download a CD iso in less than 8-10 hours).  It is available for both Linux and M$ as an executable (you have have to install " p7zip" compression tool as I can not remember).</p><p>The current version has built-in support for automatically downloading and loading the following distributions, though installing other distributions is also supported:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Ubuntu (and official derivatives)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6.06 LTS, 6.10, 7.04, 7.10, 8.04 LTS, 8.10, 9.04, Daily CD Images<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Debian<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Stable/Etch, Testing/Lenny, Unstable/Sid<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Linux Mint<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3.1, 4.0, 5-r1, 6<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * openSUSE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 10.2, 10.3, 11.0, 11.1, Factory<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Arch Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2007.08<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Damn Small Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4.4<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * SliTaz<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Stable, Cooking<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Puppy Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4.00<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * gNewSense<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; deltah-2.1<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * FreeBSD<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6.3, 7.0<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * NetBSD<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4.0<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Fedora<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 7, 8, 9, 10, Rawhide<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * PCLinuxOS<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2007, 2008<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Sabayon Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4-LiteMCE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Gentoo<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2007.0, 2008.0<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * MEPIS<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SimplyMEPIS 8, AntiX 8<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Zenwalk<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5.2<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Slax<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 6<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Dreamlinux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3.2<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Elive<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Development<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * CentOS<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4, 5<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Mandriva<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2007.1, 2008.0, 2008.1<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * FaunOS<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 0.5.4<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Frugalware Linux<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Stable, Testing, Current<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * xPUD<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 0.8.9</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should look at " unetbootin " ( http : //lubi.sourceforge.net/unetbootin.html ) which will put a linux " liveCD " onto a usb flash drive sow that you can boot and run without ever having to burn a CD ( it can use a downloaded ISO image ) or it will download it when running ( for those that can download a CD iso in less than 8-10 hours ) .
It is available for both Linux and M $ as an executable ( you have have to install " p7zip " compression tool as I can not remember ) .The current version has built-in support for automatically downloading and loading the following distributions , though installing other distributions is also supported :         * Ubuntu ( and official derivatives )                     6.06 LTS , 6.10 , 7.04 , 7.10 , 8.04 LTS , 8.10 , 9.04 , Daily CD Images         * Debian                     Stable/Etch , Testing/Lenny , Unstable/Sid         * Linux Mint                     3.1 , 4.0 , 5-r1 , 6         * openSUSE                     10.2 , 10.3 , 11.0 , 11.1 , Factory         * Arch Linux                     2007.08         * Damn Small Linux                     4.4         * SliTaz                     Stable , Cooking         * Puppy Linux                     4.00         * gNewSense                     deltah-2.1         * FreeBSD                     6.3 , 7.0         * NetBSD                     4.0         * Fedora                     7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , Rawhide         * PCLinuxOS                     2007 , 2008         * Sabayon Linux                     4-LiteMCE         * Gentoo                     2007.0 , 2008.0         * MEPIS                     SimplyMEPIS 8 , AntiX 8         * Zenwalk                     5.2         * Slax                     6         * Dreamlinux                     3.2         * Elive                     Development         * CentOS                     4 , 5         * Mandriva                     2007.1 , 2008.0 , 2008.1         * FaunOS                     0.5.4         * Frugalware Linux                     Stable , Testing , Current         * xPUD                     0.8.9</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should look at "unetbootin"  (http://lubi.sourceforge.net/unetbootin.html) which will put a linux "liveCD" onto a usb flash drive sow that you can boot and run without ever having to burn a CD (it can use a downloaded ISO image) or it will download it when running (for those that can download a CD iso in less than 8-10 hours).
It is available for both Linux and M$ as an executable (you have have to install " p7zip" compression tool as I can not remember).The current version has built-in support for automatically downloading and loading the following distributions, though installing other distributions is also supported:
        * Ubuntu (and official derivatives)
                    6.06 LTS, 6.10, 7.04, 7.10, 8.04 LTS, 8.10, 9.04, Daily CD Images
        * Debian
                    Stable/Etch, Testing/Lenny, Unstable/Sid
        * Linux Mint
                    3.1, 4.0, 5-r1, 6
        * openSUSE
                    10.2, 10.3, 11.0, 11.1, Factory
        * Arch Linux
                    2007.08
        * Damn Small Linux
                    4.4
        * SliTaz
                    Stable, Cooking
        * Puppy Linux
                    4.00
        * gNewSense
                    deltah-2.1
        * FreeBSD
                    6.3, 7.0
        * NetBSD
                    4.0
        * Fedora
                    7, 8, 9, 10, Rawhide
        * PCLinuxOS
                    2007, 2008
        * Sabayon Linux
                    4-LiteMCE
        * Gentoo
                    2007.0, 2008.0
        * MEPIS
                    SimplyMEPIS 8, AntiX 8
        * Zenwalk
                    5.2
        * Slax
                    6
        * Dreamlinux
                    3.2
        * Elive
                    Development
        * CentOS
                    4, 5
        * Mandriva
                    2007.1, 2008.0, 2008.1
        * FaunOS
                    0.5.4
        * Frugalware Linux
                    Stable, Testing, Current
        * xPUD
                    0.8.9</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501065</id>
	<title>Re:Somebody is thinking at Microsoft?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246124820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would shoot Jeffrey Bewkes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would shoot Jeffrey Bewkes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would shoot Jeffrey Bewkes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981</id>
	<title>I guess that's nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246135560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least you could wipe the thing and get a thumb drive out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you could wipe the thing and get a thumb drive out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you could wipe the thing and get a thumb drive out of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Live Live Distro finally means somethin</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1246095720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite. Nevermind.</i> </p><p>It may not be a "live distro," but Win 7 has already captured about half the desktop share of Linux. <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10" title="hitslink.com">Operating System Market Share</a> [hitslink.com] </p><p>Net Applications is mass-market oriented. If your gadget can access the web, Net Applications will track it.</p><p> W3Schools is developer-oriented. But even there Win 7 has 1/4 the share of Linux. <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers\_os.asp" title="w3schools.com">OS Platform Statistics</a> [w3schools.com] </p><p> It took Linux six damn years to move from 2\% to 4\% in the W3Schools stats.</p><p>Win 7 gets a 1\% share in five months.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait , that 'll never make them bite .
Nevermind. It may not be a " live distro , " but Win 7 has already captured about half the desktop share of Linux .
Operating System Market Share [ hitslink.com ] Net Applications is mass-market oriented .
If your gadget can access the web , Net Applications will track it .
W3Schools is developer-oriented .
But even there Win 7 has 1/4 the share of Linux .
OS Platform Statistics [ w3schools.com ] It took Linux six damn years to move from 2 \ % to 4 \ % in the W3Schools stats.Win 7 gets a 1 \ % share in five months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe MSFT can copy Linux and make it a live distro so people can try it out before full install... wait, that'll never make them bite.
Nevermind. It may not be a "live distro," but Win 7 has already captured about half the desktop share of Linux.
Operating System Market Share [hitslink.com] Net Applications is mass-market oriented.
If your gadget can access the web, Net Applications will track it.
W3Schools is developer-oriented.
But even there Win 7 has 1/4 the share of Linux.
OS Platform Statistics [w3schools.com]  It took Linux six damn years to move from 2\% to 4\% in the W3Schools stats.Win 7 gets a 1\% share in five months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500561</id>
	<title>Re:Idiots.</title>
	<author>denttford</author>
	<datestamp>1246120320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shrug. I'm writing this response on a Z530 powered Fujitsu U820 with 1 GB of RAM. In Washington Square Park.  And I mean writing: the pen input on Windows 7 is fantastic.  1 BSOD in a month of use-which was heat related (I left the thing on in a bag).  The constraints on my use are not any worse than on similar hardware using  XP or Ubuntu. I skipped Vista, but Win 7 has been very impressive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shrug .
I 'm writing this response on a Z530 powered Fujitsu U820 with 1 GB of RAM .
In Washington Square Park .
And I mean writing : the pen input on Windows 7 is fantastic .
1 BSOD in a month of use-which was heat related ( I left the thing on in a bag ) .
The constraints on my use are not any worse than on similar hardware using XP or Ubuntu .
I skipped Vista , but Win 7 has been very impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shrug.
I'm writing this response on a Z530 powered Fujitsu U820 with 1 GB of RAM.
In Washington Square Park.
And I mean writing: the pen input on Windows 7 is fantastic.
1 BSOD in a month of use-which was heat related (I left the thing on in a bag).
The constraints on my use are not any worse than on similar hardware using  XP or Ubuntu.
I skipped Vista, but Win 7 has been very impressive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28505573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28506823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28503467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498651
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28504637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28525311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_27_1919221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28506823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497311
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498319
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497973
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497251
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502601
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497465
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498455
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28505573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497783
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497603
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28525311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497475
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498187
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28503467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502315
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502277
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28499037
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497971
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500561
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28510163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28502259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28496981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28504637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28498179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_27_1919221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28497947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28501863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_27_1919221.28500307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
