<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_26_1342215</id>
	<title>Doctors Baffled, Intrigued By Girl Who Doesn't Age</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1246026540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>phyrebyrd writes <i>"<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=7880954">Brooke Greenberg</a> is the size of an infant, with the mental capacity of a toddler. <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/2020/popup?id=7881955">She turned 16 in January</a>. Brooke hasn't aged in the conventional sense. Dr. Richard Walker of the University of South Florida College of Medicine, in Tampa, says Brooke's body is not developing as a coordinated unit, but as independent parts that are out of sync. She has never been diagnosed with any known genetic syndrome or chromosomal abnormality that would help explain why. Brooke's hair and her nails are the only two things that grow, Howard said. 'She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old,' he said."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>phyrebyrd writes " Brooke Greenberg is the size of an infant , with the mental capacity of a toddler .
She turned 16 in January .
Brooke has n't aged in the conventional sense .
Dr. Richard Walker of the University of South Florida College of Medicine , in Tampa , says Brooke 's body is not developing as a coordinated unit , but as independent parts that are out of sync .
She has never been diagnosed with any known genetic syndrome or chromosomal abnormality that would help explain why .
Brooke 's hair and her nails are the only two things that grow , Howard said .
'She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old, ' he said .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>phyrebyrd writes "Brooke Greenberg is the size of an infant, with the mental capacity of a toddler.
She turned 16 in January.
Brooke hasn't aged in the conventional sense.
Dr. Richard Walker of the University of South Florida College of Medicine, in Tampa, says Brooke's body is not developing as a coordinated unit, but as independent parts that are out of sync.
She has never been diagnosed with any known genetic syndrome or chromosomal abnormality that would help explain why.
Brooke's hair and her nails are the only two things that grow, Howard said.
'She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old,' he said.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487859</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>immcintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1246008780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A deprecated feature.</p><p>Thanks nature, but we can keep things moving along on our own from now on...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A deprecated feature.Thanks nature , but we can keep things moving along on our own from now on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A deprecated feature.Thanks nature, but we can keep things moving along on our own from now on...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482807</id>
	<title>Re:The Fountain of Youth.</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1246032000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.</p></div><p>citation needed</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that , if followed honestly , usually lead to children becoming very capable , healthy adults.citation needed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.citation needed
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482517</id>
	<title>Re:Be Careful what you wish for!</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1246031280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The diminished mental capacity comes from teh fact that as kids grow up from  birth to their teens there is a lot of mental development int he brain that goes on.   For her it is stopped at infancy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The diminished mental capacity comes from teh fact that as kids grow up from birth to their teens there is a lot of mental development int he brain that goes on .
For her it is stopped at infancy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The diminished mental capacity comes from teh fact that as kids grow up from  birth to their teens there is a lot of mental development int he brain that goes on.
For her it is stopped at infancy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483585</id>
	<title>Shamless XKCE...</title>
	<author>slack\_justyb</author>
	<datestamp>1246034520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going to have to mark this bug as:
<br> <br>
FAILURE TO REPRODUCE
<br> <br>
I'm citing a lack of girlfriend as the cause.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to have to mark this bug as : FAILURE TO REPRODUCE I 'm citing a lack of girlfriend as the cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to have to mark this bug as:
 
FAILURE TO REPRODUCE
 
I'm citing a lack of girlfriend as the cause.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255</id>
	<title>The Fountain of Youth.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>She must've drank from it by mistake. This is why Moms should be attentive of their children!
<br> <br>
Seriously, age is a really interesting field to me, especially cognitive age. I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults. What's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She must 've drank from it by mistake .
This is why Moms should be attentive of their children !
Seriously , age is a really interesting field to me , especially cognitive age .
I really like how there are stages in raising a child that , if followed honestly , usually lead to children becoming very capable , healthy adults .
What 's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She must've drank from it by mistake.
This is why Moms should be attentive of their children!
Seriously, age is a really interesting field to me, especially cognitive age.
I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.
What's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483525</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1246034280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many of those "earlier simpler life forms" are still around and doing fine. Bacteria, most notably.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of those " earlier simpler life forms " are still around and doing fine .
Bacteria , most notably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of those "earlier simpler life forms" are still around and doing fine.
Bacteria, most notably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483185</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>tonycheese</author>
	<datestamp>1246033200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This idea doesn't seem reasonable. There are definitely many, many disadvantages to being in a vulnerable infant stage for 20 years of your life. Old age isn't good, but not being able to quickly reach a stage where you can fend for yourself is a major problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This idea does n't seem reasonable .
There are definitely many , many disadvantages to being in a vulnerable infant stage for 20 years of your life .
Old age is n't good , but not being able to quickly reach a stage where you can fend for yourself is a major problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This idea doesn't seem reasonable.
There are definitely many, many disadvantages to being in a vulnerable infant stage for 20 years of your life.
Old age isn't good, but not being able to quickly reach a stage where you can fend for yourself is a major problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old age is a feature, not a bug. With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment. It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual. Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.</p><p>Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature, and were superseded by others who had it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment .
It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual .
Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature , and were superseded by others who had it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old age is a feature, not a bug.
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.
It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual.
Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature, and were superseded by others who had it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>naasking</author>
	<datestamp>1246034580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Old age is a feature, not a bug. With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.</i></p><p>Not necessarily. Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.Not necessarily .
Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old age is a feature, not a bug.
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.Not necessarily.
Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484551</id>
	<title>I've seen something similar</title>
	<author>sircastor</author>
	<datestamp>1246038120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really know the specifics though. I knew a guy who was 20, but looked like a 12-year old. He had had cancer at a young age, and (as he explained) he hadn't really grown since. He was also a pathological liar, and quite immature as well, so I'm not certain how much of his story was truth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really know the specifics though .
I knew a guy who was 20 , but looked like a 12-year old .
He had had cancer at a young age , and ( as he explained ) he had n't really grown since .
He was also a pathological liar , and quite immature as well , so I 'm not certain how much of his story was truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really know the specifics though.
I knew a guy who was 20, but looked like a 12-year old.
He had had cancer at a young age, and (as he explained) he hadn't really grown since.
He was also a pathological liar, and quite immature as well, so I'm not certain how much of his story was truth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071</id>
	<title>HGH Receptors</title>
	<author>SpottedKuh</author>
	<datestamp>1246032900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke's life, but the treatment produced no results.  Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist. "We took her back in six months, and the doctor looked at us and said, 'Why didn't you give Brooke the growth hormones?' And I said, 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones. We gave her everything you told us to do.' And Brooke didn't put on a pound, an ounce; she didn't grow an inch."</p></div></blockquote><p>So clearly an HGH deficiency isn't the (only) issue, it's that her HGH receptors don't respond to the hormone.  But, to the best of my knowledge, that wouldn't account for a lack of mental development.  This sounds like a combination of many factors coming together.</p><p>I'll have to take a look to see if there's anything written from a medical perspective (e.g., a journal paper) on this case.  It could be interesting to hear what the doctors have to say, as opposed to what ABC News reports the poor mother has to say (projecting her wishes onto her daughter: thinking she's a rebellious teenager when really she's just an infant).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke 's life , but the treatment produced no results .
Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist .
" We took her back in six months , and the doctor looked at us and said , 'Why did n't you give Brooke the growth hormones ?
' And I said , 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones .
We gave her everything you told us to do .
' And Brooke did n't put on a pound , an ounce ; she did n't grow an inch .
" So clearly an HGH deficiency is n't the ( only ) issue , it 's that her HGH receptors do n't respond to the hormone .
But , to the best of my knowledge , that would n't account for a lack of mental development .
This sounds like a combination of many factors coming together.I 'll have to take a look to see if there 's anything written from a medical perspective ( e.g. , a journal paper ) on this case .
It could be interesting to hear what the doctors have to say , as opposed to what ABC News reports the poor mother has to say ( projecting her wishes onto her daughter : thinking she 's a rebellious teenager when really she 's just an infant ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke's life, but the treatment produced no results.
Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist.
"We took her back in six months, and the doctor looked at us and said, 'Why didn't you give Brooke the growth hormones?
' And I said, 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones.
We gave her everything you told us to do.
' And Brooke didn't put on a pound, an ounce; she didn't grow an inch.
"So clearly an HGH deficiency isn't the (only) issue, it's that her HGH receptors don't respond to the hormone.
But, to the best of my knowledge, that wouldn't account for a lack of mental development.
This sounds like a combination of many factors coming together.I'll have to take a look to see if there's anything written from a medical perspective (e.g., a journal paper) on this case.
It could be interesting to hear what the doctors have to say, as opposed to what ABC News reports the poor mother has to say (projecting her wishes onto her daughter: thinking she's a rebellious teenager when really she's just an infant).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483535</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1246034340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah.  In several hundred years she'll hit puberty.  Then within a few weeks she'll develop blue-green lesions that will cover her body.  She'll turn grup, meaning she'll become violent and full of rage, and then die.  I saw it on TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
In several hundred years she 'll hit puberty .
Then within a few weeks she 'll develop blue-green lesions that will cover her body .
She 'll turn grup , meaning she 'll become violent and full of rage , and then die .
I saw it on TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
In several hundred years she'll hit puberty.
Then within a few weeks she'll develop blue-green lesions that will cover her body.
She'll turn grup, meaning she'll become violent and full of rage, and then die.
I saw it on TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191</id>
	<title>I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>cml4524</author>
	<datestamp>1246030440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just struck me reading that... it must really , REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483195</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What if we have it backwards?</p><p>What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?</p></div><p>It's like I've been saying- you kids are going \_way\_ too fast!</p><p>Now, get off my lawn!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if we have it backwards ? What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow ? It 's like I 've been saying- you kids are going \ _way \ _ too fast ! Now , get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if we have it backwards?What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?It's like I've been saying- you kids are going \_way\_ too fast!Now, get off my lawn!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</id>
	<title>Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246035120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.  Her symptoms fit to the last detail.</p><p>This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.  The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'child ' is a primordial dwarf .
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already , probably several other sites as well , and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition .
The poor kid 's doctors either do n't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.
The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489517</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246017540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Old age is a feature, not a bug. With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.</i> </p><p>Not necessarily. Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive.</p></div><p>Not after they've reproduced.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment .
Not necessarily .
Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive.Not after they 've reproduced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Old age is a feature, not a bug.
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.
Not necessarily.
Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive.Not after they've reproduced.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483103</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Vahokif</author>
	<datestamp>1246033020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why? There's probably a perfectly good evolutionary reason for dying of old age. It's just bad (?) for us as individuals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
There 's probably a perfectly good evolutionary reason for dying of old age .
It 's just bad ( ?
) for us as individuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
There's probably a perfectly good evolutionary reason for dying of old age.
It's just bad (?
) for us as individuals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1246031340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up? If he doesn't develop, you should kill him?</p></div><p>No, but in this case, the child is being used as a human TOY for the parents. It is not a viable human in terms of what humans are normally for. It is its parents toy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway , the only reason you do n't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up ?
If he does n't develop , you should kill him ? No , but in this case , the child is being used as a human TOY for the parents .
It is not a viable human in terms of what humans are normally for .
It is its parents toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?
If he doesn't develop, you should kill him?No, but in this case, the child is being used as a human TOY for the parents.
It is not a viable human in terms of what humans are normally for.
It is its parents toy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483639</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>oiron</author>
	<datestamp>1246034700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And just how many advanced lifeforms have <i>you</i> seen today?</p><p> <i>Beam me up, Scotty. There's no intelligent life down here</i> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And just how many advanced lifeforms have you seen today ?
Beam me up , Scotty .
There 's no intelligent life down here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And just how many advanced lifeforms have you seen today?
Beam me up, Scotty.
There's no intelligent life down here </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483375</id>
	<title>Relativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has anyone considered that she might just be moving very close to the speed of light?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone considered that she might just be moving very close to the speed of light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone considered that she might just be moving very close to the speed of light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483305</id>
	<title>Anybody feel for the sister?</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1246033560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I watched the little blurb and noticed the "younger" sister. Can you imagine the pressure she must be under as a teenager seeing her "older" sister get all the attention and focus?<br><br>Power to her!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched the little blurb and noticed the " younger " sister .
Can you imagine the pressure she must be under as a teenager seeing her " older " sister get all the attention and focus ? Power to her !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched the little blurb and noticed the "younger" sister.
Can you imagine the pressure she must be under as a teenager seeing her "older" sister get all the attention and focus?Power to her!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28492491</id>
	<title>Re:babies are very cute</title>
	<author>idlemachine</author>
	<datestamp>1246133340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>perhaps you could even clone yourself, and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises. when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle, just leave them by the side of the road</p></div><p>And deprive myself of a fresh source of compatible bone marrow &amp; organs? Are you crazy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps you could even clone yourself , and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises .
when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle , just leave them by the side of the roadAnd deprive myself of a fresh source of compatible bone marrow &amp; organs ?
Are you crazy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps you could even clone yourself, and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises.
when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle, just leave them by the side of the roadAnd deprive myself of a fresh source of compatible bone marrow &amp; organs?
Are you crazy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483127</id>
	<title>what a bunch of</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>jews</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>jews</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jews</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484627</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246038360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's also interesting to look at old age from a genetic perspective.  As Richard Dawkins explained in The Selfish Gene, genes that are bad for us but are expressed after the age that people have kids will NOT be selected against in evolution.  Think about it: if there's a gene that kills you when you're 70, then you've already had your kids by then and passed it on and so there's no evolutionary pressure to get rid of that gene.  This could, in fact, be the cause of aging.  Over the entire course of evolution, there were genes that caused gray hair or cancer or other bad things that happened to spread through the gene pool (by chance, of course, since no evolutionary pressure would select FOR them either) so that now once we are past the age of having kids, the genes turn on and we age (ie, deteriorate, as opposed to what happens until our reproductive age)</p><p>Dawkins also proposed an interesting - although impractical - solution to extend life.  If people delayed having kids until they were 20, then until 25, then until 30, and so on, these genes would be slowly selected against and weeded out of the population and our ability to live longer would be increased from a genetic standpoint instead of just an environmental standpoint (ie, better water, easy access to food, etc.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also interesting to look at old age from a genetic perspective .
As Richard Dawkins explained in The Selfish Gene , genes that are bad for us but are expressed after the age that people have kids will NOT be selected against in evolution .
Think about it : if there 's a gene that kills you when you 're 70 , then you 've already had your kids by then and passed it on and so there 's no evolutionary pressure to get rid of that gene .
This could , in fact , be the cause of aging .
Over the entire course of evolution , there were genes that caused gray hair or cancer or other bad things that happened to spread through the gene pool ( by chance , of course , since no evolutionary pressure would select FOR them either ) so that now once we are past the age of having kids , the genes turn on and we age ( ie , deteriorate , as opposed to what happens until our reproductive age ) Dawkins also proposed an interesting - although impractical - solution to extend life .
If people delayed having kids until they were 20 , then until 25 , then until 30 , and so on , these genes would be slowly selected against and weeded out of the population and our ability to live longer would be increased from a genetic standpoint instead of just an environmental standpoint ( ie , better water , easy access to food , etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also interesting to look at old age from a genetic perspective.
As Richard Dawkins explained in The Selfish Gene, genes that are bad for us but are expressed after the age that people have kids will NOT be selected against in evolution.
Think about it: if there's a gene that kills you when you're 70, then you've already had your kids by then and passed it on and so there's no evolutionary pressure to get rid of that gene.
This could, in fact, be the cause of aging.
Over the entire course of evolution, there were genes that caused gray hair or cancer or other bad things that happened to spread through the gene pool (by chance, of course, since no evolutionary pressure would select FOR them either) so that now once we are past the age of having kids, the genes turn on and we age (ie, deteriorate, as opposed to what happens until our reproductive age)Dawkins also proposed an interesting - although impractical - solution to extend life.
If people delayed having kids until they were 20, then until 25, then until 30, and so on, these genes would be slowly selected against and weeded out of the population and our ability to live longer would be increased from a genetic standpoint instead of just an environmental standpoint (ie, better water, easy access to food, etc.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482751</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246031880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you (and the authors of this story) have it backward.  She's not growing or developing, but she *is* aging.  If she makes it to 60 she'll be a wrinkly old baby and she won't live longer than a normal person.  Her condition is much more about growth than it is about aging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you ( and the authors of this story ) have it backward .
She 's not growing or developing , but she * is * aging .
If she makes it to 60 she 'll be a wrinkly old baby and she wo n't live longer than a normal person .
Her condition is much more about growth than it is about aging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you (and the authors of this story) have it backward.
She's not growing or developing, but she *is* aging.
If she makes it to 60 she'll be a wrinkly old baby and she won't live longer than a normal person.
Her condition is much more about growth than it is about aging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482417</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>SIBM</author>
	<datestamp>1246031040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What took this so long to hit the media?  Must have been a slownewsday</htmltext>
<tokenext>What took this so long to hit the media ?
Must have been a slownewsday</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What took this so long to hit the media?
Must have been a slownewsday</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293</id>
	<title>She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
And it appears that, at 16, she still has the brains and skill set of an infant<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this is going to sound cruel, but without any more details, it sounds like a good argument for post-birth abortion. I mean, what's the point? At least "The Strange Case of Benjamin Button" had SOME growth of character.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it appears that , at 16 , she still has the brains and skill set of an infant ... this is going to sound cruel , but without any more details , it sounds like a good argument for post-birth abortion .
I mean , what 's the point ?
At least " The Strange Case of Benjamin Button " had SOME growth of character .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
And it appears that, at 16, she still has the brains and skill set of an infant ... this is going to sound cruel, but without any more details, it sounds like a good argument for post-birth abortion.
I mean, what's the point?
At least "The Strange Case of Benjamin Button" had SOME growth of character.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483291</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sound like a fucking slashdotter dork right now. Seriously, the only reason we don't kill babies is because they'll become people? Are you for real? Go back to eating cheetos and voting for ron paul you fucking stupid neckbeard you will never grasp actual human society so stay in your basement playing WOW.</p><p>We don't kill babies because we don't kill people. It is in our society and in our brains not to kill people who have done nothing wrong. This is because it wouldn't be beneficial to humans to do so. Babies are innocent and have done nothing wrong. Killing them is murder. Murder is wrong on a moral level, not a pragmatic level, in our minds and in civilized societies. Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans. This is another inborn thing; we see babies as cute and protect them. We protect them because as a social creatures we want to protect our young. Protecting our young because they will become people is a lot different than not killing our young because they will become people. Obviously, on a natural level this is so we don't die out, but on a moral level its because that is what we see as right. There is no pragmatic level that requires processing all of this, its either inborn natural instinct or morality's layer built on top of it or both. If you are sitting around thinking "well I'd kill that baby but its gonna grow up into a person so I wont" then check yourself into a hospital. You sound like some of the catholics i know who say that if God didnt exist than killing people wouldnt be wrong. It scares the fuck out of me that the slightlest wavering in their beliefs and suddenly murder isnt a problem anymore. Logic and law should not be what holds you back from acts of indisputable immorality and if it is, then you have something wrong with you.</p><p>Also babies are people because they are people. They arent fucking pokemon they dont evolve, they are people who are younger. I mean seriously wtf are you on that makes you come in here all high and mighty acting like you understand why society doesnt want babies to die. I bet you stayed up all night trying to figure out why that girl was kissing that baby instead of you and after 12 hours you came to this fucking idiotic conclusion: she probably knew he was gonna turn into people and thats why she didnt kill him! Society established a taboo around killing infants because they are fucking infants, they are innocent, killing innocents is wrong in any society that isnt barbaric and killing people who have no defense or are "easy" to kill is looked down upon and babies fit in all of these things. No one was like "well there really needs to be a good solid logical argument against baby killing.. maybe because they will become people?" Its just fucking wrong and everyone knows it. Im sorry i just cannot believe how fucking stupid people can be especially people on the internet who take cynical to the next fucking level (and im a pretty bitter fucking person too)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sound like a fucking slashdotter dork right now .
Seriously , the only reason we do n't kill babies is because they 'll become people ?
Are you for real ?
Go back to eating cheetos and voting for ron paul you fucking stupid neckbeard you will never grasp actual human society so stay in your basement playing WOW.We do n't kill babies because we do n't kill people .
It is in our society and in our brains not to kill people who have done nothing wrong .
This is because it would n't be beneficial to humans to do so .
Babies are innocent and have done nothing wrong .
Killing them is murder .
Murder is wrong on a moral level , not a pragmatic level , in our minds and in civilized societies .
Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans .
This is another inborn thing ; we see babies as cute and protect them .
We protect them because as a social creatures we want to protect our young .
Protecting our young because they will become people is a lot different than not killing our young because they will become people .
Obviously , on a natural level this is so we do n't die out , but on a moral level its because that is what we see as right .
There is no pragmatic level that requires processing all of this , its either inborn natural instinct or morality 's layer built on top of it or both .
If you are sitting around thinking " well I 'd kill that baby but its gon na grow up into a person so I wont " then check yourself into a hospital .
You sound like some of the catholics i know who say that if God didnt exist than killing people wouldnt be wrong .
It scares the fuck out of me that the slightlest wavering in their beliefs and suddenly murder isnt a problem anymore .
Logic and law should not be what holds you back from acts of indisputable immorality and if it is , then you have something wrong with you.Also babies are people because they are people .
They arent fucking pokemon they dont evolve , they are people who are younger .
I mean seriously wtf are you on that makes you come in here all high and mighty acting like you understand why society doesnt want babies to die .
I bet you stayed up all night trying to figure out why that girl was kissing that baby instead of you and after 12 hours you came to this fucking idiotic conclusion : she probably knew he was gon na turn into people and thats why she didnt kill him !
Society established a taboo around killing infants because they are fucking infants , they are innocent , killing innocents is wrong in any society that isnt barbaric and killing people who have no defense or are " easy " to kill is looked down upon and babies fit in all of these things .
No one was like " well there really needs to be a good solid logical argument against baby killing.. maybe because they will become people ?
" Its just fucking wrong and everyone knows it .
Im sorry i just can not believe how fucking stupid people can be especially people on the internet who take cynical to the next fucking level ( and im a pretty bitter fucking person too )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sound like a fucking slashdotter dork right now.
Seriously, the only reason we don't kill babies is because they'll become people?
Are you for real?
Go back to eating cheetos and voting for ron paul you fucking stupid neckbeard you will never grasp actual human society so stay in your basement playing WOW.We don't kill babies because we don't kill people.
It is in our society and in our brains not to kill people who have done nothing wrong.
This is because it wouldn't be beneficial to humans to do so.
Babies are innocent and have done nothing wrong.
Killing them is murder.
Murder is wrong on a moral level, not a pragmatic level, in our minds and in civilized societies.
Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans.
This is another inborn thing; we see babies as cute and protect them.
We protect them because as a social creatures we want to protect our young.
Protecting our young because they will become people is a lot different than not killing our young because they will become people.
Obviously, on a natural level this is so we don't die out, but on a moral level its because that is what we see as right.
There is no pragmatic level that requires processing all of this, its either inborn natural instinct or morality's layer built on top of it or both.
If you are sitting around thinking "well I'd kill that baby but its gonna grow up into a person so I wont" then check yourself into a hospital.
You sound like some of the catholics i know who say that if God didnt exist than killing people wouldnt be wrong.
It scares the fuck out of me that the slightlest wavering in their beliefs and suddenly murder isnt a problem anymore.
Logic and law should not be what holds you back from acts of indisputable immorality and if it is, then you have something wrong with you.Also babies are people because they are people.
They arent fucking pokemon they dont evolve, they are people who are younger.
I mean seriously wtf are you on that makes you come in here all high and mighty acting like you understand why society doesnt want babies to die.
I bet you stayed up all night trying to figure out why that girl was kissing that baby instead of you and after 12 hours you came to this fucking idiotic conclusion: she probably knew he was gonna turn into people and thats why she didnt kill him!
Society established a taboo around killing infants because they are fucking infants, they are innocent, killing innocents is wrong in any society that isnt barbaric and killing people who have no defense or are "easy" to kill is looked down upon and babies fit in all of these things.
No one was like "well there really needs to be a good solid logical argument against baby killing.. maybe because they will become people?
" Its just fucking wrong and everyone knows it.
Im sorry i just cannot believe how fucking stupid people can be especially people on the internet who take cynical to the next fucking level (and im a pretty bitter fucking person too)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488489</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>sgt scrub</author>
	<datestamp>1246011420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm you made me want to look at it as a time issue.  If you aged exactly the same at the exact same rate but time was incremented differently life for you would be the same.  For example, if her 1 year is our 8 years she will be 96 with the body and mind of an 18 year old but to her it would only be 18 years.  Maybe she is normal but in a time shift.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm you made me want to look at it as a time issue .
If you aged exactly the same at the exact same rate but time was incremented differently life for you would be the same .
For example , if her 1 year is our 8 years she will be 96 with the body and mind of an 18 year old but to her it would only be 18 years .
Maybe she is normal but in a time shift .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm you made me want to look at it as a time issue.
If you aged exactly the same at the exact same rate but time was incremented differently life for you would be the same.
For example, if her 1 year is our 8 years she will be 96 with the body and mind of an 18 year old but to her it would only be 18 years.
Maybe she is normal but in a time shift.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487571</id>
	<title>I don't want to be the first person who says this</title>
	<author>Viperlin</author>
	<datestamp>1246007520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but....</p><p>she's legal in the UK now</p><p>don't link pedobear to this article</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but....she 's legal in the UK nowdo n't link pedobear to this article</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but....she's legal in the UK nowdon't link pedobear to this article</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483563</id>
	<title>Re:Stil can't have sex</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1246034400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's okay, they'll just 'shop her head to an adult woman's body and fantasize about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's okay , they 'll just 'shop her head to an adult woman 's body and fantasize about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's okay, they'll just 'shop her head to an adult woman's body and fantasize about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>smallfries</author>
	<datestamp>1246032900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mr. Taucross, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Taucross , what you 've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard .
At no point in your rambling , incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought .
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it .
I award you no points , and may God have mercy on your soul .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Taucross, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>LizardKing</author>
	<datestamp>1246032840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old,' he said.</i> </p><p>That's nothing, I work in an office with some programmers who haven't changed their outfits in over twenty years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old, ' he said .
That 's nothing , I work in an office with some programmers who have n't changed their outfits in over twenty years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> She has pajamas and outfits that are 10 or 12 years old,' he said.
That's nothing, I work in an office with some programmers who haven't changed their outfits in over twenty years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484711</id>
	<title>Re:The Fountain of Youth.</title>
	<author>Leif\_Bloomquist</author>
	<datestamp>1246038600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.</i></p><p>Check out this TED talk about delayed gratification, your statement reminded me of it:<br><a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/joachim\_de\_posada\_says\_don\_t\_eat\_the\_marshmallow\_yet.html" title="ted.com">http://www.ted.com/talks/joachim\_de\_posada\_says\_don\_t\_eat\_the\_marshmallow\_yet.html</a> [ted.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that , if followed honestly , usually lead to children becoming very capable , healthy adults.Check out this TED talk about delayed gratification , your statement reminded me of it : http : //www.ted.com/talks/joachim \ _de \ _posada \ _says \ _don \ _t \ _eat \ _the \ _marshmallow \ _yet.html [ ted.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.Check out this TED talk about delayed gratification, your statement reminded me of it:http://www.ted.com/talks/joachim\_de\_posada\_says\_don\_t\_eat\_the\_marshmallow\_yet.html [ted.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485993</id>
	<title>The real question is...</title>
	<author>mordejai</author>
	<datestamp>1246043700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...will it be legal to fuck her in 2 years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...will it be legal to fuck her in 2 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...will it be legal to fuck her in 2 years?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483067</id>
	<title>maybe show live a thousand years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there is no aging decline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is no aging decline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is no aging decline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485205</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>j-beda</author>
	<datestamp>1246040460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"fit to the last detail"?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial\_dwarf" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial\_dwarf</a> [wikipedia.org] has descriptions of various forms of PD, none of which seem to match very well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" fit to the last detail " ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial \ _dwarf [ wikipedia.org ] has descriptions of various forms of PD , none of which seem to match very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"fit to the last detail"?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial\_dwarf [wikipedia.org] has descriptions of various forms of PD, none of which seem to match very well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485099</id>
	<title>So how would you know....</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1246040100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if she were to get into a relationship with someone her own age, or a few years older...they would actually look like pedophiles but not really BE a pedophile. So if we go further, someone who would intentionally go out with someone like this would be branded a pedophile off the bat, as she should never be allowed to know real love/lust until she is at least THIS tall to ride on the ride???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if she were to get into a relationship with someone her own age , or a few years older...they would actually look like pedophiles but not really BE a pedophile .
So if we go further , someone who would intentionally go out with someone like this would be branded a pedophile off the bat , as she should never be allowed to know real love/lust until she is at least THIS tall to ride on the ride ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if she were to get into a relationship with someone her own age, or a few years older...they would actually look like pedophiles but not really BE a pedophile.
So if we go further, someone who would intentionally go out with someone like this would be branded a pedophile off the bat, as she should never be allowed to know real love/lust until she is at least THIS tall to ride on the ride??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485361</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BS. Primordial dwarfs aren't stuck in a perpetual state of toddlerhood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BS .
Primordial dwarfs are n't stuck in a perpetual state of toddlerhood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BS.
Primordial dwarfs aren't stuck in a perpetual state of toddlerhood.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485389</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>bluefoxlucid</author>
	<datestamp>1246041180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans. This is another inborn thing; we see babies as cute and protect them.</p></div><p>What twisted parallel universe do you come from?  Babies are gross, disgusting sacks of diseased shit constantly leaking goo, vomiting, shitting, smelling absolutely horrible (even a clean baby has a distinct scent from a clean adult-- and it's overpowering, and horribly disgusting), besides making noise and in general acting completely devoid of any mental function whatsoever.  I stay the hell away from the fucking things.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans .
This is another inborn thing ; we see babies as cute and protect them.What twisted parallel universe do you come from ?
Babies are gross , disgusting sacks of diseased shit constantly leaking goo , vomiting , shitting , smelling absolutely horrible ( even a clean baby has a distinct scent from a clean adult-- and it 's overpowering , and horribly disgusting ) , besides making noise and in general acting completely devoid of any mental function whatsoever .
I stay the hell away from the fucking things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Babies also are meant to be seen as cute by humans.
This is another inborn thing; we see babies as cute and protect them.What twisted parallel universe do you come from?
Babies are gross, disgusting sacks of diseased shit constantly leaking goo, vomiting, shitting, smelling absolutely horrible (even a clean baby has a distinct scent from a clean adult-- and it's overpowering, and horribly disgusting), besides making noise and in general acting completely devoid of any mental function whatsoever.
I stay the hell away from the fucking things.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482813</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1246032060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about you, but I would <b>not</b> want to be 16 for 30 years...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I would not want to be 16 for 30 years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I would not want to be 16 for 30 years...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485807</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1246042800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One only needs to look at insects like mayflies and some moths that molt without functioning mouthparts to see that aging past your mating prime is a net loss for most life, as the non-breeding parents simply use up resources that the young could be using.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One only needs to look at insects like mayflies and some moths that molt without functioning mouthparts to see that aging past your mating prime is a net loss for most life , as the non-breeding parents simply use up resources that the young could be using.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One only needs to look at insects like mayflies and some moths that molt without functioning mouthparts to see that aging past your mating prime is a net loss for most life, as the non-breeding parents simply use up resources that the young could be using.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275</id>
	<title>Be Careful what you wish for!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has all the markings of a fable where someone wishes to never get old.  It is a very curious case indeed though.  I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has all the markings of a fable where someone wishes to never get old .
It is a very curious case indeed though .
I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has all the markings of a fable where someone wishes to never get old.
It is a very curious case indeed though.
I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484155</id>
	<title>OK, you 'for the children' obsessives...</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1246036680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a couple of years, when she turns 18, would nudes of her be child porn?  Eh?</p><p>(listens for the sounds of heads exploding)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a couple of years , when she turns 18 , would nudes of her be child porn ?
Eh ? ( listens for the sounds of heads exploding )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a couple of years, when she turns 18, would nudes of her be child porn?
Eh?(listens for the sounds of heads exploding)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1246032120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.</i></p><p>What if we have it backwards?</p><p>What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?</p><p>So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old?!</p><p>I mean if you think about it, old age is a disease.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just struck me reading that... it must really , REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.What if we have it backwards ? What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow ? So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old ?
! I mean if you think about it , old age is a disease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.What if we have it backwards?What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old?
!I mean if you think about it, old age is a disease.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483205</id>
	<title>Her stem cells are worth a fortune.</title>
	<author>goffster</author>
	<datestamp>1246033260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a possible fountain of youth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a possible fountain of youth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a possible fountain of youth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483287</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><br> <i>Except that you might get it named after</i> <br> <br>Sadly, they named my condition <i>Gigantus Penis Maximus Syndrome</i> and left my name right out of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that you might get it named after Sadly , they named my condition Gigantus Penis Maximus Syndrome and left my name right out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Except that you might get it named after  Sadly, they named my condition Gigantus Penis Maximus Syndrome and left my name right out of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28507881</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246191240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's what I call "the Slashdot effect"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's what I call " the Slashdot effect "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's what I call "the Slashdot effect"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491181</id>
	<title>Re:babies are very cute</title>
	<author>Kesch</author>
	<datestamp>1246035300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>*this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you have</p></div><p>Ha! Joke's on you! I already sold all my ethics!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you haveHa !
Joke 's on you !
I already sold all my ethics !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you haveHa!
Joke's on you!
I already sold all my ethics!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485473</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sure they aren't just, you know, dead?<br>No strange odors in the office, no screams from the walls, blood gushing from faucets?</p><p>Nah it's probably nothing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sure they are n't just , you know , dead ? No strange odors in the office , no screams from the walls , blood gushing from faucets ? Nah it 's probably nothing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sure they aren't just, you know, dead?No strange odors in the office, no screams from the walls, blood gushing from faucets?Nah it's probably nothing...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483049</id>
	<title>Yeah really...</title>
	<author>McNihil</author>
	<datestamp>1246032840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So all this has been under wraps for 16 years?!?</p><p>I call all this bull and raise them a handful of shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So all this has been under wraps for 16 years ? !
? I call all this bull and raise them a handful of shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So all this has been under wraps for 16 years?!
?I call all this bull and raise them a handful of shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485849</id>
	<title>Re:Surgeon General's warning</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1246042980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and the increased risk of kwisatzia haderachitis.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>GOVERNMENT WARNING : ( 1 ) According to the Surgeon general , women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects .
...and the increased risk of kwisatzia haderachitis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.
...and the increased risk of kwisatzia haderachitis.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486171</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to age or failure to grow?</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1246044360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.</p></div><p>And that thing is necrophilia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.And that thing is necrophilia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.And that thing is necrophilia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485491</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No it doesn't fit.  There are very obvious physical characteristics with that kind of dwarfism and this child doesn't have them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No it does n't fit .
There are very obvious physical characteristics with that kind of dwarfism and this child does n't have them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it doesn't fit.
There are very obvious physical characteristics with that kind of dwarfism and this child doesn't have them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482863</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>alexborges</author>
	<datestamp>1246032240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so we should judge humans and their viability by some sort of golden standard which you posess?</p><p>Nah, my friend: a kid is her parents property. They should do whatever they want to do with the particular set of stuff that happened to them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so we should judge humans and their viability by some sort of golden standard which you posess ? Nah , my friend : a kid is her parents property .
They should do whatever they want to do with the particular set of stuff that happened to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so we should judge humans and their viability by some sort of golden standard which you posess?Nah, my friend: a kid is her parents property.
They should do whatever they want to do with the particular set of stuff that happened to them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483733</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah really...</title>
	<author>N1ck0</author>
	<datestamp>1246035060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly, so she might have the cure for aging but they waited till now to publish the case?  I know hospitals are slow, but man waiting 15+ years to get around to investigating a patient.  <br>Don't ever go to this Dr Walker if you think you might have a terminal illness...you'll be dead by the time he runs the blood tests.
<br> <br>
Hell If this was real pharmaceutical companies would be tossing bags of cash in her parent's window in exchange for a couple of blood cells.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , so she might have the cure for aging but they waited till now to publish the case ?
I know hospitals are slow , but man waiting 15 + years to get around to investigating a patient .
Do n't ever go to this Dr Walker if you think you might have a terminal illness...you 'll be dead by the time he runs the blood tests .
Hell If this was real pharmaceutical companies would be tossing bags of cash in her parent 's window in exchange for a couple of blood cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, so she might have the cure for aging but they waited till now to publish the case?
I know hospitals are slow, but man waiting 15+ years to get around to investigating a patient.
Don't ever go to this Dr Walker if you think you might have a terminal illness...you'll be dead by the time he runs the blood tests.
Hell If this was real pharmaceutical companies would be tossing bags of cash in her parent's window in exchange for a couple of blood cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487289</id>
	<title>Re:OK, you 'for the children' obsessives...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246049640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>who cares</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>who cares</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who cares</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486769</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246047480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?  You would most certainly need to be high to believe in an invisible daddy on a cloud who made everything and loves you, except when he doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
You would most certainly need to be high to believe in an invisible daddy on a cloud who made everything and loves you , except when he does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
You would most certainly need to be high to believe in an invisible daddy on a cloud who made everything and loves you, except when he doesn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488471</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246011360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least we know what the Timecube guy's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. handle is now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least we know what the Timecube guy 's / .
handle is now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least we know what the Timecube guy's /.
handle is now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484041</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>zehaeva</author>
	<datestamp>1246036260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Watching Babylon 5 a bit much ?? ^\_\_^</htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching Babylon 5 a bit much ? ?
^ \ _ \ _ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching Babylon 5 a bit much ??
^\_\_^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491891</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>jd</author>
	<datestamp>1246040700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the average person relies on machines to read maps, machines to add even trivial numbers together, and machines to do their reading for them, what is the difference between a four-year-old and the average person?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the average person relies on machines to read maps , machines to add even trivial numbers together , and machines to do their reading for them , what is the difference between a four-year-old and the average person ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the average person relies on machines to read maps, machines to add even trivial numbers together, and machines to do their reading for them, what is the difference between a four-year-old and the average person?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484305</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246037280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What can you tell me about Time Cube???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What can you tell me about Time Cube ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What can you tell me about Time Cube??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482781</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246031940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/I keed I keed.</i></p><p>I suppose. Soon she'll be targeted by freaks looking to make legal kiddy pron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal ?
/I keed I keed.I suppose .
Soon she 'll be targeted by freaks looking to make legal kiddy pron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal?
/I keed I keed.I suppose.
Soon she'll be targeted by freaks looking to make legal kiddy pron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482977</id>
	<title>Stil can't have sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all you slashdot perverts, no this doesn't mean you can have sex with her. People of need to be mature mental state, as well as physical state before consent can be given.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all you slashdot perverts , no this does n't mean you can have sex with her .
People of need to be mature mental state , as well as physical state before consent can be given .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all you slashdot perverts, no this doesn't mean you can have sex with her.
People of need to be mature mental state, as well as physical state before consent can be given.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484479</id>
	<title>So she's allowed to drive and own a gun soon...</title>
	<author>Mr. Picklesworth</author>
	<datestamp>1246037880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps this type of illness will provide a concrete enough example that governments should stop regulating personal privileges based on the clock age of a person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps this type of illness will provide a concrete enough example that governments should stop regulating personal privileges based on the clock age of a person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps this type of illness will provide a concrete enough example that governments should stop regulating personal privileges based on the clock age of a person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484387</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Msdose</author>
	<datestamp>1246037520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, In the congo there is an unprecedented epidemic of raping women to death as a feature of the wars there. The rappers describe this as an artistic way of describing humanities raping of Mother Earth to death. Maybe the Africans can claim artistic license.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , In the congo there is an unprecedented epidemic of raping women to death as a feature of the wars there .
The rappers describe this as an artistic way of describing humanities raping of Mother Earth to death .
Maybe the Africans can claim artistic license .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, In the congo there is an unprecedented epidemic of raping women to death as a feature of the wars there.
The rappers describe this as an artistic way of describing humanities raping of Mother Earth to death.
Maybe the Africans can claim artistic license.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484201</id>
	<title>This is old news.</title>
	<author>carpefishus</author>
	<datestamp>1246036860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call McCoy, or we all become grups.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call McCoy , or we all become grups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call McCoy, or we all become grups.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Andr T.</author>
	<datestamp>1246031040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I \_really\_ don't think her parents would agree with that.

</p><p>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up? If he doesn't develop, you should kill him?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I \ _really \ _ do n't think her parents would agree with that .
Anyway , the only reason you do n't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up ?
If he does n't develop , you should kill him ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I \_really\_ don't think her parents would agree with that.
Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?
If he doesn't develop, you should kill him?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483343</id>
	<title>Another case</title>
	<author>polymeris</author>
	<datestamp>1246033680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is this girl/woman in Brazil, Maria Aldenete, who has similar syntoms. I couldn't find any info in English on her... She's 30 years old or so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is this girl/woman in Brazil , Maria Aldenete , who has similar syntoms .
I could n't find any info in English on her... She 's 30 years old or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is this girl/woman in Brazil, Maria Aldenete, who has similar syntoms.
I couldn't find any info in English on her... She's 30 years old or so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485229</id>
	<title>Re:HGH Receptors</title>
	<author>nasor</author>
	<datestamp>1246040580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A medical journal article on her can be found here: <a href="http://www4.utsouthwestern.edu/cellbio/shay-wright/publications/MechAgeDevel-Publication-4-1-09.pdf" title="utsouthwestern.edu">http://www4.utsouthwestern.edu/cellbio/shay-wright/publications/MechAgeDevel-Publication-4-1-09.pdf</a> [utsouthwestern.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A medical journal article on her can be found here : http : //www4.utsouthwestern.edu/cellbio/shay-wright/publications/MechAgeDevel-Publication-4-1-09.pdf [ utsouthwestern.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A medical journal article on her can be found here: http://www4.utsouthwestern.edu/cellbio/shay-wright/publications/MechAgeDevel-Publication-4-1-09.pdf [utsouthwestern.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071</id>
	<title>Gunter Grass called...</title>
	<author>hesiod</author>
	<datestamp>1246039980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...he's looking for a little recognition.  Seriously, has no one ever read, watched, or heard of Der Blechtrommel (The Tin Drum)?</p><p>It's about a little boy who decides not to grow up and his body doesn't age.  IT WON THE FREAKING NOBEL PRIZE FOR LITERATURE!!!</p><p>Geez, you people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...he 's looking for a little recognition .
Seriously , has no one ever read , watched , or heard of Der Blechtrommel ( The Tin Drum ) ? It 's about a little boy who decides not to grow up and his body does n't age .
IT WON THE FREAKING NOBEL PRIZE FOR LITERATURE ! !
! Geez , you people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...he's looking for a little recognition.
Seriously, has no one ever read, watched, or heard of Der Blechtrommel (The Tin Drum)?It's about a little boy who decides not to grow up and his body doesn't age.
IT WON THE FREAKING NOBEL PRIZE FOR LITERATURE!!
!Geez, you people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482915</id>
	<title>Re:Be Careful what you wish for!</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1246032360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, now, there are two aspects to this: brain growth, and learning.</p><p>A human's brain is pretty close to adult size and mass by the age of 5. You can say that this is the scaffold on which the remaining 5\% of mass growth is built on. But more importantly, the cells (both in that initial 95\% and subsequent 5\%) are growing connections to each other, and these connections seem to be based on learning. White matter also is slowly replaced to a small degree with gray matter; white matter is "wiring" between active cells of gray matter "processors".</p><p>This may explain, to some extent, why the (physiologically very) young lady in TFA is functioning intellectually like a toddler: her uneven growth affects the basic brain development you'd expect in early childhood (the 95\% mass mentioned earlier), so the brain lacks structural complexity to grow "learning connections". I suppose restricted brain growth is fortunate, in a sense; if her cranium hasn't grown, age-appropriate brain growth would be bad.</p><p>IANADoctor. This is just how the described phenomena match up in my mind with the little childhood development (psychology/anatomy) studies and basic physiology I've learned here and there. YMMV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , now , there are two aspects to this : brain growth , and learning.A human 's brain is pretty close to adult size and mass by the age of 5 .
You can say that this is the scaffold on which the remaining 5 \ % of mass growth is built on .
But more importantly , the cells ( both in that initial 95 \ % and subsequent 5 \ % ) are growing connections to each other , and these connections seem to be based on learning .
White matter also is slowly replaced to a small degree with gray matter ; white matter is " wiring " between active cells of gray matter " processors " .This may explain , to some extent , why the ( physiologically very ) young lady in TFA is functioning intellectually like a toddler : her uneven growth affects the basic brain development you 'd expect in early childhood ( the 95 \ % mass mentioned earlier ) , so the brain lacks structural complexity to grow " learning connections " .
I suppose restricted brain growth is fortunate , in a sense ; if her cranium has n't grown , age-appropriate brain growth would be bad.IANADoctor .
This is just how the described phenomena match up in my mind with the little childhood development ( psychology/anatomy ) studies and basic physiology I 've learned here and there .
YMMV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, now, there are two aspects to this: brain growth, and learning.A human's brain is pretty close to adult size and mass by the age of 5.
You can say that this is the scaffold on which the remaining 5\% of mass growth is built on.
But more importantly, the cells (both in that initial 95\% and subsequent 5\%) are growing connections to each other, and these connections seem to be based on learning.
White matter also is slowly replaced to a small degree with gray matter; white matter is "wiring" between active cells of gray matter "processors".This may explain, to some extent, why the (physiologically very) young lady in TFA is functioning intellectually like a toddler: her uneven growth affects the basic brain development you'd expect in early childhood (the 95\% mass mentioned earlier), so the brain lacks structural complexity to grow "learning connections".
I suppose restricted brain growth is fortunate, in a sense; if her cranium hasn't grown, age-appropriate brain growth would be bad.IANADoctor.
This is just how the described phenomena match up in my mind with the little childhood development (psychology/anatomy) studies and basic physiology I've learned here and there.
YMMV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482823</id>
	<title>Re:Wow...great stuff</title>
	<author>brouski</author>
	<datestamp>1246032060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great, or sad, depending on your point of view.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , or sad , depending on your point of view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, or sad, depending on your point of view.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486773</id>
	<title>Re:Gunter Grass called...</title>
	<author>SteveFoerster</author>
	<datestamp>1246047540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, although I was thinking more like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck\_Everlasting" title="wikipedia.org">Tuck Everlasting</a> [wikipedia.org], by Natalie Babbitt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , although I was thinking more like Tuck Everlasting [ wikipedia.org ] , by Natalie Babbitt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, although I was thinking more like Tuck Everlasting [wikipedia.org], by Natalie Babbitt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482901</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1246032300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And soldiers die in Iraq because the US is not sufficiently anti-gay, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And soldiers die in Iraq because the US is not sufficiently anti-gay , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And soldiers die in Iraq because the US is not sufficiently anti-gay, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485795</id>
	<title>Peter Pan</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1246042740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A child who never grows up.  Haven't we had enough stories about Michael Jackson?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A child who never grows up .
Have n't we had enough stories about Michael Jackson ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A child who never grows up.
Haven't we had enough stories about Michael Jackson?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491389</id>
	<title>Are you possibly projecting?</title>
	<author>reiisi</author>
	<datestamp>1246037220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since I have to have some text here, I'll explain what shouldn't be necessary.</p><p>Do you feel as if you were your parents' toy?</p><p>If so, it's not an uncommon experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since I have to have some text here , I 'll explain what should n't be necessary.Do you feel as if you were your parents ' toy ? If so , it 's not an uncommon experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since I have to have some text here, I'll explain what shouldn't be necessary.Do you feel as if you were your parents' toy?If so, it's not an uncommon experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?</p></div><p>Yes, this <em>is</em> why our society has established a taboo around killing infants. Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants?<br>I'm not trying to downplay the important of that reason, but yeah, it's the reason we don't kill babies. It's the reason we consider them people instead of property: they have the potential to turn into people.</p><p>I'm too much of an optimist to go slaughtering babies with potentially curable problems just because they're inconvenient, but to deny "we don't kill babies because babies turn into people" as an absolute fact (which stands completely by itself without the support of any other reasons) is beyond stupid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway , the only reason you do n't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up ? Yes , this is why our society has established a taboo around killing infants .
Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants ? I 'm not trying to downplay the important of that reason , but yeah , it 's the reason we do n't kill babies .
It 's the reason we consider them people instead of property : they have the potential to turn into people.I 'm too much of an optimist to go slaughtering babies with potentially curable problems just because they 're inconvenient , but to deny " we do n't kill babies because babies turn into people " as an absolute fact ( which stands completely by itself without the support of any other reasons ) is beyond stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?Yes, this is why our society has established a taboo around killing infants.
Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants?I'm not trying to downplay the important of that reason, but yeah, it's the reason we don't kill babies.
It's the reason we consider them people instead of property: they have the potential to turn into people.I'm too much of an optimist to go slaughtering babies with potentially curable problems just because they're inconvenient, but to deny "we don't kill babies because babies turn into people" as an absolute fact (which stands completely by itself without the support of any other reasons) is beyond stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28500489</id>
	<title>Re:No, she is aging too</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1246119660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Some of her body part , like bone structure, are 10 years old. Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited. They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed. Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak. Without it you can't. Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in.</p></div><p>Damn, too bad people who don't have vocal abilities or hearing can't talk.</p><p>They've tried teaching her sign language (in the abc news video, I saw them working on what appeared to be some sign language... and yes, I do speak sign language conversationally.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of her body part , like bone structure , are 10 years old .
Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited .
They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed .
Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak .
Without it you ca n't .
Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in.Damn , too bad people who do n't have vocal abilities or hearing ca n't talk.They 've tried teaching her sign language ( in the abc news video , I saw them working on what appeared to be some sign language... and yes , I do speak sign language conversationally .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of her body part , like bone structure, are 10 years old.
Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited.
They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed.
Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak.
Without it you can't.
Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in.Damn, too bad people who don't have vocal abilities or hearing can't talk.They've tried teaching her sign language (in the abc news video, I saw them working on what appeared to be some sign language... and yes, I do speak sign language conversationally.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491213</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246035660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Truly? Look at current porn, the most popular stuff seems to be of the "barely legal" variety (18-22 yrs old). Many models look younger than that, and there hasn't been any cries of pedophilia (well techinically ephebophilia) yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Truly ?
Look at current porn , the most popular stuff seems to be of the " barely legal " variety ( 18-22 yrs old ) .
Many models look younger than that , and there has n't been any cries of pedophilia ( well techinically ephebophilia ) yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Truly?
Look at current porn, the most popular stuff seems to be of the "barely legal" variety (18-22 yrs old).
Many models look younger than that, and there hasn't been any cries of pedophilia (well techinically ephebophilia) yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488965</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Dasher42</author>
	<datestamp>1246014180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh man, you just don't want to call bacteria simple.  Those little bastards can hot-swap DNA between themselves without having to undergo any cell division.  If you could do that, who would you bump up against for an update?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , you just do n't want to call bacteria simple .
Those little bastards can hot-swap DNA between themselves without having to undergo any cell division .
If you could do that , who would you bump up against for an update ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, you just don't want to call bacteria simple.
Those little bastards can hot-swap DNA between themselves without having to undergo any cell division.
If you could do that, who would you bump up against for an update?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483541</id>
	<title>I've seen this before, sorta...</title>
	<author>Yert</author>
	<datestamp>1246034340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an aunt who was in her third trimester when she was in a car accident, and Dolly was born soon after with no apparent damage... except she never grew up.  Dolly passed away a few years ago, at the age of 33, and weighed about 80 pounds - she did grow "up", but much slower than normal - she was 20 before she weighed 40 pounds, and never spoke a single intelligible word.  She never matured mentally beyond around 6 months, and was always in a crib at all the family gatherings.  Thankfully, I never had to change her diaper.</p><p>There are some differences, as Dolly did seem to physically mature, just very slowly - but the doctors didn't seem to think it was that phenomenal, just brain damage from the accident.  She did have the same odd development that Megan's eyes have - the wandering eye, so to speak. (As opposed to my wandering eye, which is entirely a different sort of affliction.)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an aunt who was in her third trimester when she was in a car accident , and Dolly was born soon after with no apparent damage... except she never grew up .
Dolly passed away a few years ago , at the age of 33 , and weighed about 80 pounds - she did grow " up " , but much slower than normal - she was 20 before she weighed 40 pounds , and never spoke a single intelligible word .
She never matured mentally beyond around 6 months , and was always in a crib at all the family gatherings .
Thankfully , I never had to change her diaper.There are some differences , as Dolly did seem to physically mature , just very slowly - but the doctors did n't seem to think it was that phenomenal , just brain damage from the accident .
She did have the same odd development that Megan 's eyes have - the wandering eye , so to speak .
( As opposed to my wandering eye , which is entirely a different sort of affliction .
) : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an aunt who was in her third trimester when she was in a car accident, and Dolly was born soon after with no apparent damage... except she never grew up.
Dolly passed away a few years ago, at the age of 33, and weighed about 80 pounds - she did grow "up", but much slower than normal - she was 20 before she weighed 40 pounds, and never spoke a single intelligible word.
She never matured mentally beyond around 6 months, and was always in a crib at all the family gatherings.
Thankfully, I never had to change her diaper.There are some differences, as Dolly did seem to physically mature, just very slowly - but the doctors didn't seem to think it was that phenomenal, just brain damage from the accident.
She did have the same odd development that Megan's eyes have - the wandering eye, so to speak.
(As opposed to my wandering eye, which is entirely a different sort of affliction.
) :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484209</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246036860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?</p></div><p>Yes, this is why our society has established a taboo around killing infants. Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants?</p></div><p>WTF is wrong with you people?????</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway , the only reason you do n't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up ? Yes , this is why our society has established a taboo around killing infants .
Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants ? WTF is wrong with you people ? ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway, the only reason you don't kill an infant is that he/she will grow up?Yes, this is why our society has established a taboo around killing infants.
Are you seriously arguing that there is any other reason for not killing infants?WTF is wrong with you people????
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371</id>
	<title>Failure to age or failure to grow?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.  This is quite something else.</p><p>It is not so much failure to age, as failure to grow/mature.  It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing .
This is quite something else.It is not so much failure to age , as failure to grow/mature .
It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.
This is quite something else.It is not so much failure to age, as failure to grow/mature.
It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484037</id>
	<title>run for your lives, lolis</title>
	<author>nausea\_malvarma</author>
	<datestamp>1246036260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So in two years she'll be 18...But still look like shes 3. Uh oh, better watch out for pedo bear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So in two years she 'll be 18...But still look like shes 3 .
Uh oh , better watch out for pedo bear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in two years she'll be 18...But still look like shes 3.
Uh oh, better watch out for pedo bear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485427</id>
	<title>I for one welcome our new overlord Brooke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our new overlord Brooke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new overlord Brooke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new overlord Brooke</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28528001</id>
	<title>Re:No, she is aging too</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1246375500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They may be able to teach her sign language.  Babies can sign much earlier than they can speak.  Motor control of the hands is simpler than the vocal organs so once they can hold a bottle they can sign.  Hope they've already tried this, or soon do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They may be able to teach her sign language .
Babies can sign much earlier than they can speak .
Motor control of the hands is simpler than the vocal organs so once they can hold a bottle they can sign .
Hope they 've already tried this , or soon do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may be able to teach her sign language.
Babies can sign much earlier than they can speak.
Motor control of the hands is simpler than the vocal organs so once they can hold a bottle they can sign.
Hope they've already tried this, or soon do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963</id>
	<title>babies are very cute</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246035840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>perhaps a large conglomerate could claim intellectual property on this mutation, and mass produce cute little baby pets that never grow up and become surly teenagers. perhaps you could even clone yourself, and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises. when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle, just leave them by the side of the road, like people always do with golden retriever puppies at the end of the summer and such*</p><p>*this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you have</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps a large conglomerate could claim intellectual property on this mutation , and mass produce cute little baby pets that never grow up and become surly teenagers .
perhaps you could even clone yourself , and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises .
when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle , just leave them by the side of the road , like people always do with golden retriever puppies at the end of the summer and such * * this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you have</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps a large conglomerate could claim intellectual property on this mutation, and mass produce cute little baby pets that never grow up and become surly teenagers.
perhaps you could even clone yourself, and have a little pet baby you to waddle around in diapers and make cute cooing noises.
when the novelty wears off and they become a hassle, just leave them by the side of the road, like people always do with golden retriever puppies at the end of the summer and such**this post brought to you in an attempt to offend every shred of ethics you have</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482637</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1246031640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any learning requires the pruning and changing of connections - this isn't happening, so Brooke can't learn.  What you see is a classic case of "it is what it is".  In anyone else, it would be called congenital severe mental retardation - a 16-year-old with the mind of an infant. Read the story - this isn't a sister or daughter - it's the family pet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any learning requires the pruning and changing of connections - this is n't happening , so Brooke ca n't learn .
What you see is a classic case of " it is what it is " .
In anyone else , it would be called congenital severe mental retardation - a 16-year-old with the mind of an infant .
Read the story - this is n't a sister or daughter - it 's the family pet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any learning requires the pruning and changing of connections - this isn't happening, so Brooke can't learn.
What you see is a classic case of "it is what it is".
In anyone else, it would be called congenital severe mental retardation - a 16-year-old with the mind of an infant.
Read the story - this isn't a sister or daughter - it's the family pet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483507</id>
	<title>Re:The Fountain of Youth.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246034220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need a citation to explain shitty parenting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need a citation to explain shitty parenting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need a citation to explain shitty parenting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439</id>
	<title>Soo....</title>
	<author>Drakin020</author>
	<datestamp>1246031040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/I keed I keed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal ?
/I keed I keed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in 2 years does that mean she is legal?
/I keed I keed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483997</id>
	<title>I don't have anything really smart to say either</title>
	<author>Xebikr</author>
	<datestamp>1246036080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Old age is a feature, not a bug. With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.</p></div></blockquote><p>
You make it sound like drm.<br> <br>
<i>DRM is a feature, not a bug. Without it it would be difficult for content industries as a whole to adapt to changing environment.</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment .
You make it sound like drm .
DRM is a feature , not a bug .
Without it it would be difficult for content industries as a whole to adapt to changing environment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old age is a feature, not a bug.
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.
You make it sound like drm.
DRM is a feature, not a bug.
Without it it would be difficult for content industries as a whole to adapt to changing environment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486307</id>
	<title>Just think...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246045140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...only two more years till she's legal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...only two more years till she 's legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...only two more years till she's legal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484545</id>
	<title>Re:HGH Receptors</title>
	<author>Hythlodaeus</author>
	<datestamp>1246038060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably being limited to an infant-sized skull would affect brain development.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably being limited to an infant-sized skull would affect brain development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably being limited to an infant-sized skull would affect brain development.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485263</id>
	<title>Kids these days</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246040700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They grow up so...<br>Oh. Nevermind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They grow up so...Oh .
Nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They grow up so...Oh.
Nevermind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486469</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>need4mospd</author>
	<datestamp>1246046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A simple "wrong" would have been just fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A simple " wrong " would have been just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A simple "wrong" would have been just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483517</id>
	<title>Diaper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246034280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a father of two, the first thing that struck me was that in all likelihood somebody has had to change her diaper for that past 16 years.  That could go on indefinitely, but even worse, imagine spending another 15 years to potty train her.  Not knowing if it's even possible.  Talk about a Sisyphean task.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a father of two , the first thing that struck me was that in all likelihood somebody has had to change her diaper for that past 16 years .
That could go on indefinitely , but even worse , imagine spending another 15 years to potty train her .
Not knowing if it 's even possible .
Talk about a Sisyphean task .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a father of two, the first thing that struck me was that in all likelihood somebody has had to change her diaper for that past 16 years.
That could go on indefinitely, but even worse, imagine spending another 15 years to potty train her.
Not knowing if it's even possible.
Talk about a Sisyphean task.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487593</id>
	<title>People don't die from the old diseases any more.</title>
	<author>Mex</author>
	<datestamp>1246007580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"People don't die from the old diseases any more. They die from new ones, but that's Progress, isnt it?</p><p>Isn't it?"</p><p>
&nbsp; Harlan Ellison<br>Jeffty is Five (1977)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" People do n't die from the old diseases any more .
They die from new ones , but that 's Progress , isnt it ? Is n't it ?
"   Harlan EllisonJeffty is Five ( 1977 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"People don't die from the old diseases any more.
They die from new ones, but that's Progress, isnt it?Isn't it?
"
  Harlan EllisonJeffty is Five (1977)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</id>
	<title>She seems to grow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just very slowly. In the pictures it looks like features are developing but it's on a very, very slow pace. Maybe she might live to be 400 or 800 if her bone structure will remain supportive over time and her cells don't stop dividing like they do with 'normal' aging. I think the parents might already have tried it but she could probably learn to speak or at least communicate over the years - the brain of a toddler is very open to it (unless her brain plasticity has been aging).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just very slowly .
In the pictures it looks like features are developing but it 's on a very , very slow pace .
Maybe she might live to be 400 or 800 if her bone structure will remain supportive over time and her cells do n't stop dividing like they do with 'normal ' aging .
I think the parents might already have tried it but she could probably learn to speak or at least communicate over the years - the brain of a toddler is very open to it ( unless her brain plasticity has been aging ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just very slowly.
In the pictures it looks like features are developing but it's on a very, very slow pace.
Maybe she might live to be 400 or 800 if her bone structure will remain supportive over time and her cells don't stop dividing like they do with 'normal' aging.
I think the parents might already have tried it but she could probably learn to speak or at least communicate over the years - the brain of a toddler is very open to it (unless her brain plasticity has been aging).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483847</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1246035420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you watch Benjamin Button one too many times?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you watch Benjamin Button one too many times ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you watch Benjamin Button one too many times?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484903</id>
	<title>She never gets old ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246039260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I Read the title i thought it was about ADA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I Read the title i thought it was about ADA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I Read the title i thought it was about ADA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28493777</id>
	<title>Re:HGH Receptors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246107420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I felt the same as you and found the article the girl's doctors wrote in the journal on the mechanisms of ageing:</p><p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428454?ordinalpos=1&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed\_ResultsPanel.Pubmed\_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed\_RVDocSum</p><p>From what I read it appears they prescribed HGH early on for 6 months. When the doctors re-examined the patient no change had been found, and so that therapy was discontinued. From the abc interview it seems the parents were the ones who actually gave the HGH injections. Being a sceptical sod I'd be interested to know whether they ever tried giving HGH in a controlled fashion under medical supervision.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I felt the same as you and found the article the girl 's doctors wrote in the journal on the mechanisms of ageing : http : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428454 ? ordinalpos = 1&amp;itool = EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed \ _ResultsPanel.Pubmed \ _DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed \ _RVDocSumFrom what I read it appears they prescribed HGH early on for 6 months .
When the doctors re-examined the patient no change had been found , and so that therapy was discontinued .
From the abc interview it seems the parents were the ones who actually gave the HGH injections .
Being a sceptical sod I 'd be interested to know whether they ever tried giving HGH in a controlled fashion under medical supervision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I felt the same as you and found the article the girl's doctors wrote in the journal on the mechanisms of ageing:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428454?ordinalpos=1&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed\_ResultsPanel.Pubmed\_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed\_RVDocSumFrom what I read it appears they prescribed HGH early on for 6 months.
When the doctors re-examined the patient no change had been found, and so that therapy was discontinued.
From the abc interview it seems the parents were the ones who actually gave the HGH injections.
Being a sceptical sod I'd be interested to know whether they ever tried giving HGH in a controlled fashion under medical supervision.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961</id>
	<title>No, she is aging too</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1246032480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some of her body part , like bone structure, are 10 years old. Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited. They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed. Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak. Without it you can't. Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of her body part , like bone structure , are 10 years old .
Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited .
They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed .
Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak .
Without it you ca n't .
Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of her body part , like bone structure, are 10 years old.
Thus it sounds doubtful she will reach the multi-centenarian age you cited.
They tried to communicate with her , tried to teach her speaking but it failed.
Anyway there is a rearrangement of the pharynx/larynx at the venerable age of 1/2 years old which is needed to be able to physically speak.
Without it you can't.
Maybe a doctor/biologist can chime in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482369</id>
	<title>Summary Links to Page 3</title>
	<author>ninjafirepants</author>
	<datestamp>1246030860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the first page: <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/Story?id=7880954&amp;page=1" title="go.com" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/Story?id=7880954&amp;page=1</a> [go.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the first page : http : //abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/Story ? id = 7880954&amp;page = 1 [ go.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the first page: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/Story?id=7880954&amp;page=1 [go.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482113</id>
	<title>Check out TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, her sister Emily is HOT in a squirrel kind of way. I'd give her a couple fat nuts to chew on while eating out her mom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , her sister Emily is HOT in a squirrel kind of way .
I 'd give her a couple fat nuts to chew on while eating out her mom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, her sister Emily is HOT in a squirrel kind of way.
I'd give her a couple fat nuts to chew on while eating out her mom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28496859</id>
	<title>Re:Gunter Grass called...</title>
	<author>Briareos</author>
	<datestamp>1246134960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ITYM <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die\_Blechtrommel" title="wikipedia.org">"Die Blechtrommel"</a> [wikipedia.org] by G&#195;&#188;nter Grass...</p><p>And no, I've never read it.</p><p><i>np: Voigt &amp; Voigt - Roxy (Kompakt Total 4)</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ITYM " Die Blechtrommel " [ wikipedia.org ] by G     nter Grass...And no , I 've never read it.np : Voigt &amp; Voigt - Roxy ( Kompakt Total 4 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ITYM "Die Blechtrommel" [wikipedia.org] by GÃ¼nter Grass...And no, I've never read it.np: Voigt &amp; Voigt - Roxy (Kompakt Total 4)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277</id>
	<title>Surgeon General's warning</title>
	<author>Blixinator</author>
	<datestamp>1246030620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.</htmltext>
<tokenext>GOVERNMENT WARNING : ( 1 ) According to the Surgeon general , women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485029</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>TheEmpyrean</author>
	<datestamp>1246039800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>She can still be a technical or political blogger or head of the Democratic party and no one would be able to tell the difference. But still true, hardly a 'normal' life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She can still be a technical or political blogger or head of the Democratic party and no one would be able to tell the difference .
But still true , hardly a 'normal ' life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She can still be a technical or political blogger or head of the Democratic party and no one would be able to tell the difference.
But still true, hardly a 'normal' life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486789</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246047600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survive</p></div><p>well old people have advantages too when compared to younger ones. they have more experience and have 'been there and done that". And those will more than likely make up for the lack in strength.</p><p>Actually what you should do is Collaborate instead of competing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survivewell old people have advantages too when compared to younger ones .
they have more experience and have 'been there and done that " .
And those will more than likely make up for the lack in strength.Actually what you should do is Collaborate instead of competing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Older organisms and younger organisms must still compete for the same resources and prove their fitness to survivewell old people have advantages too when compared to younger ones.
they have more experience and have 'been there and done that".
And those will more than likely make up for the lack in strength.Actually what you should do is Collaborate instead of competing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485547</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Effexor</author>
	<datestamp>1246041780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.  Her symptoms fit to the last detail.</p><p>This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.  The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.</p></div><p>
Or maybe, just a wild thought here, maybe they have a slightly better insight into her symptoms, having actually examined her and seen her test results, and they have already ruled that out for reasons which your cursory diagnosis, based on reading an ABCnews article and several minutes of medical training, missed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'child ' is a primordial dwarf .
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already , probably several other sites as well , and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition .
The poor kid 's doctors either do n't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent .
Or maybe , just a wild thought here , maybe they have a slightly better insight into her symptoms , having actually examined her and seen her test results , and they have already ruled that out for reasons which your cursory diagnosis , based on reading an ABCnews article and several minutes of medical training , missed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.
The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.
Or maybe, just a wild thought here, maybe they have a slightly better insight into her symptoms, having actually examined her and seen her test results, and they have already ruled that out for reasons which your cursory diagnosis, based on reading an ABCnews article and several minutes of medical training, missed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483003</id>
	<title>yoda she is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now all we need is the press release about light sabers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now all we need is the press release about light sabers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now all we need is the press release about light sabers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483193</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>whiledo</author>
	<datestamp>1246033260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You die mainly because of cell damage accumulation</p></div><p>I'd like to see a bit of a citation.  As far as I've seen, it's still a bit up in the air as to what exactly causes aging and why our bodies can't have a mechanism to counter it.  We have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeLa" title="wikipedia.org">immortal cancer</a> [wikipedia.org] cells that do not shorten their telomeres each time they divide.  They just keep making new healthy cells to replace the ones that have died from cell damage.  So part of why we die is because of this built-in time bomb in our cells.  Another part may have to do with inflammation, where a process that is good for our body in general eventually brings it down in the long run.</p><p>If you look through the animal kingdom, you'll see quite a few examples of animals that have a much different system of aging.  It seems possible that mutations could greatly lengthen the lifespan of a human.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You die mainly because of cell damage accumulationI 'd like to see a bit of a citation .
As far as I 've seen , it 's still a bit up in the air as to what exactly causes aging and why our bodies ca n't have a mechanism to counter it .
We have immortal cancer [ wikipedia.org ] cells that do not shorten their telomeres each time they divide .
They just keep making new healthy cells to replace the ones that have died from cell damage .
So part of why we die is because of this built-in time bomb in our cells .
Another part may have to do with inflammation , where a process that is good for our body in general eventually brings it down in the long run.If you look through the animal kingdom , you 'll see quite a few examples of animals that have a much different system of aging .
It seems possible that mutations could greatly lengthen the lifespan of a human .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You die mainly because of cell damage accumulationI'd like to see a bit of a citation.
As far as I've seen, it's still a bit up in the air as to what exactly causes aging and why our bodies can't have a mechanism to counter it.
We have immortal cancer [wikipedia.org] cells that do not shorten their telomeres each time they divide.
They just keep making new healthy cells to replace the ones that have died from cell damage.
So part of why we die is because of this built-in time bomb in our cells.
Another part may have to do with inflammation, where a process that is good for our body in general eventually brings it down in the long run.If you look through the animal kingdom, you'll see quite a few examples of animals that have a much different system of aging.
It seems possible that mutations could greatly lengthen the lifespan of a human.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483027</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to age or failure to grow?</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1246032780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But "failure to grow" is so much less catchy than "failure to age".   "Failure to age" implies "live forever!"  "Failure to grow" implies "live a normal or truncated lifespan as an under-developed individual who requires special care for most or all of that time."  And since this is a kdawson article, you don't need to look beyond the headline to realize the main point is sensationalist hype without a shred of scientific basis.</p><p>There is no reason to believe that failure to grow implies anything other than a normal or, more probably, a truncated lifespan.  Humans are already tuned up, for obvious evolutionary reasons, to live far longer than a normal mammal (normal mammals live about a billion of their own heartbeats, humans live twice that.)  It is very unlikely that a random genetic anomaly will extend the viable span of a system that is already highly optimized for longevity.</p><p>My bet:  she'll be dead in a few years, early 30's at the latest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But " failure to grow " is so much less catchy than " failure to age " .
" Failure to age " implies " live forever !
" " Failure to grow " implies " live a normal or truncated lifespan as an under-developed individual who requires special care for most or all of that time .
" And since this is a kdawson article , you do n't need to look beyond the headline to realize the main point is sensationalist hype without a shred of scientific basis.There is no reason to believe that failure to grow implies anything other than a normal or , more probably , a truncated lifespan .
Humans are already tuned up , for obvious evolutionary reasons , to live far longer than a normal mammal ( normal mammals live about a billion of their own heartbeats , humans live twice that .
) It is very unlikely that a random genetic anomaly will extend the viable span of a system that is already highly optimized for longevity.My bet : she 'll be dead in a few years , early 30 's at the latest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But "failure to grow" is so much less catchy than "failure to age".
"Failure to age" implies "live forever!
"  "Failure to grow" implies "live a normal or truncated lifespan as an under-developed individual who requires special care for most or all of that time.
"  And since this is a kdawson article, you don't need to look beyond the headline to realize the main point is sensationalist hype without a shred of scientific basis.There is no reason to believe that failure to grow implies anything other than a normal or, more probably, a truncated lifespan.
Humans are already tuned up, for obvious evolutionary reasons, to live far longer than a normal mammal (normal mammals live about a billion of their own heartbeats, humans live twice that.
)  It is very unlikely that a random genetic anomaly will extend the viable span of a system that is already highly optimized for longevity.My bet:  she'll be dead in a few years, early 30's at the latest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483557</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246034400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aging is a side-effect of being built out of linear DNA. Telomeres become longer every time a cell divides, and as such can carry less and less information. This is more commonly known as "aging."
<br> <br>
Interestingly, spherical DNA molecules do not have this side effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aging is a side-effect of being built out of linear DNA .
Telomeres become longer every time a cell divides , and as such can carry less and less information .
This is more commonly known as " aging .
" Interestingly , spherical DNA molecules do not have this side effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aging is a side-effect of being built out of linear DNA.
Telomeres become longer every time a cell divides, and as such can carry less and less information.
This is more commonly known as "aging.
"
 
Interestingly, spherical DNA molecules do not have this side effect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486335</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246045320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brain growth and development could have been delayed in addition to everything else. I wouldn't really think it'd remain at such a level forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain growth and development could have been delayed in addition to everything else .
I would n't really think it 'd remain at such a level forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain growth and development could have been delayed in addition to everything else.
I wouldn't really think it'd remain at such a level forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488195</id>
	<title>She's not the only one</title>
	<author>BoppreH</author>
	<datestamp>1246010280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Brazil there is a case of a 29 years old woman with the same "disease". The TV program that showed her is very sensationalist, the case is real.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3THlCV9hXTw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3THlCV9hXTw</a> [youtube.com]

(it's in Portuguese, but you are not missing much)</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Brazil there is a case of a 29 years old woman with the same " disease " .
The TV program that showed her is very sensationalist , the case is real .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 3THlCV9hXTw [ youtube.com ] ( it 's in Portuguese , but you are not missing much )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Brazil there is a case of a 29 years old woman with the same "disease".
The TV program that showed her is very sensationalist, the case is real.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3THlCV9hXTw [youtube.com]

(it's in Portuguese, but you are not missing much)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487801</id>
	<title>Re:Relativity</title>
	<author>Anenome</author>
	<datestamp>1246008480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't the matter in our bodies composed of atoms, which themselves are composed of light which is actually moving at the speed of light (just in a closed loop we call 'matter')?</p><p>I once read a theory of momentum, that it was caused by the energy/matter in your body 'grinding' against the speed of light when you move, since it's already moving at the speed of light and has to adjust for even the slightest speed change. It resists, because it can never exceed the speed of light. So it absorbs converts movement into additional stored energy while never violating the speed of light. Thus you get momentum and mass only when you change speeds, and no change at a particular speed--just like an object floating in space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the matter in our bodies composed of atoms , which themselves are composed of light which is actually moving at the speed of light ( just in a closed loop we call 'matter ' ) ? I once read a theory of momentum , that it was caused by the energy/matter in your body 'grinding ' against the speed of light when you move , since it 's already moving at the speed of light and has to adjust for even the slightest speed change .
It resists , because it can never exceed the speed of light .
So it absorbs converts movement into additional stored energy while never violating the speed of light .
Thus you get momentum and mass only when you change speeds , and no change at a particular speed--just like an object floating in space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the matter in our bodies composed of atoms, which themselves are composed of light which is actually moving at the speed of light (just in a closed loop we call 'matter')?I once read a theory of momentum, that it was caused by the energy/matter in your body 'grinding' against the speed of light when you move, since it's already moving at the speed of light and has to adjust for even the slightest speed change.
It resists, because it can never exceed the speed of light.
So it absorbs converts movement into additional stored energy while never violating the speed of light.
Thus you get momentum and mass only when you change speeds, and no change at a particular speed--just like an object floating in space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483407</id>
	<title>Appearance has changed</title>
	<author>Cinnaman</author>
	<datestamp>1246033860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking through the slideshow, she does appear to be ageing in some ways even if she hasn't changed much physically. If she survived into old age I imagine she still would have wrinkly skin and white hair etc.<br>From the information available it looks like rather than not ageing, she hasn't grown up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking through the slideshow , she does appear to be ageing in some ways even if she has n't changed much physically .
If she survived into old age I imagine she still would have wrinkly skin and white hair etc.From the information available it looks like rather than not ageing , she has n't grown up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking through the slideshow, she does appear to be ageing in some ways even if she hasn't changed much physically.
If she survived into old age I imagine she still would have wrinkly skin and white hair etc.From the information available it looks like rather than not ageing, she hasn't grown up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483329</id>
	<title>Wow, not what I expected</title>
	<author>CaptSaltyJack</author>
	<datestamp>1246033620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, this article is not what I expected in the slightest. Here I was thinking it was some hot 21-year-old girl who was gonna look 21 the rest of her life, and I was gonna show up here and say "Some guy is gonna be a super lucky husband!" But, uh...er... anyway, moving right along.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , this article is not what I expected in the slightest .
Here I was thinking it was some hot 21-year-old girl who was gon na look 21 the rest of her life , and I was gon na show up here and say " Some guy is gon na be a super lucky husband !
" But , uh...er... anyway , moving right along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, this article is not what I expected in the slightest.
Here I was thinking it was some hot 21-year-old girl who was gonna look 21 the rest of her life, and I was gonna show up here and say "Some guy is gonna be a super lucky husband!
" But, uh...er... anyway, moving right along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488951</id>
	<title>Re:Surgeon General's warning</title>
	<author>mobby\_6kl</author>
	<datestamp>1246014060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the old and busted warning which has been determined to be insufficient. Please update your information to comply.</p><p>WARNING:<br>The fountain of youth contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. These chemicals are contained in the fountain fluid, in many solid materials making up the fountain and the surrounding area, and materials used to maintain the fountain, including, but not limited to, washing detergent, soap, brooms, and brushes. In addition, the fountain emits vapors and when used generates used water, vapors and other fecal matter which contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.<br>(Posted in accordance with Proposition 65 in Cal. Health &amp; Safety Code 25249.5)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the old and busted warning which has been determined to be insufficient .
Please update your information to comply.WARNING : The fountain of youth contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm .
These chemicals are contained in the fountain fluid , in many solid materials making up the fountain and the surrounding area , and materials used to maintain the fountain , including , but not limited to , washing detergent , soap , brooms , and brushes .
In addition , the fountain emits vapors and when used generates used water , vapors and other fecal matter which contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm .
( Posted in accordance with Proposition 65 in Cal .
Health &amp; Safety Code 25249.5 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the old and busted warning which has been determined to be insufficient.
Please update your information to comply.WARNING:The fountain of youth contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
These chemicals are contained in the fountain fluid, in many solid materials making up the fountain and the surrounding area, and materials used to maintain the fountain, including, but not limited to, washing detergent, soap, brooms, and brushes.
In addition, the fountain emits vapors and when used generates used water, vapors and other fecal matter which contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
(Posted in accordance with Proposition 65 in Cal.
Health &amp; Safety Code 25249.5)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485177</id>
	<title>Re:the answer is in the abc article</title>
	<author>juancnuno</author>
	<datestamp>1246040340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Her intelligence seems affected though. Shouldn't she have normal mental development if it was just HGH insensitivity? She's 16 and still talks like a baby.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Her intelligence seems affected though .
Should n't she have normal mental development if it was just HGH insensitivity ?
She 's 16 and still talks like a baby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her intelligence seems affected though.
Shouldn't she have normal mental development if it was just HGH insensitivity?
She's 16 and still talks like a baby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489217</id>
	<title>JunkFood</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246015740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look at what the parents are eating, in this world of preprocessed foods; a baby affected by the numerous preservatives found in almost all foods was bound to happen.  Perhaps her body has genetically bonded with a preservative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at what the parents are eating , in this world of preprocessed foods ; a baby affected by the numerous preservatives found in almost all foods was bound to happen .
Perhaps her body has genetically bonded with a preservative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at what the parents are eating, in this world of preprocessed foods; a baby affected by the numerous preservatives found in almost all foods was bound to happen.
Perhaps her body has genetically bonded with a preservative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486341</id>
	<title>Re:The Fountain of Youth.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246045320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the Bible (100\% factual as we all know) Adam and Methuselah lived between 800 and 970 years.</p><p>If you look at the bible scientifically... you're stupid.<br>But after the flood no one live as long.<br>Maybe there is a leftover piece of really good DNA that has survived and she is lucky to have it.</p><p>Think of the changes she will live to see.</p><p>Oceans drying up.<br>Oil and Gas reserves being drained dry.<br>Israel and Palestine at peace.<br>Intelligence in a female pop singer.<br>A nice comment from Simon Cowel.<br>US debt being PAID IN FULL.<br>Porn on iPhones.. wait we already have that thanks to Safari.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the Bible ( 100 \ % factual as we all know ) Adam and Methuselah lived between 800 and 970 years.If you look at the bible scientifically... you 're stupid.But after the flood no one live as long.Maybe there is a leftover piece of really good DNA that has survived and she is lucky to have it.Think of the changes she will live to see.Oceans drying up.Oil and Gas reserves being drained dry.Israel and Palestine at peace.Intelligence in a female pop singer.A nice comment from Simon Cowel.US debt being PAID IN FULL.Porn on iPhones.. wait we already have that thanks to Safari .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the Bible (100\% factual as we all know) Adam and Methuselah lived between 800 and 970 years.If you look at the bible scientifically... you're stupid.But after the flood no one live as long.Maybe there is a leftover piece of really good DNA that has survived and she is lucky to have it.Think of the changes she will live to see.Oceans drying up.Oil and Gas reserves being drained dry.Israel and Palestine at peace.Intelligence in a female pop singer.A nice comment from Simon Cowel.US debt being PAID IN FULL.Porn on iPhones.. wait we already have that thanks to Safari.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482921</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I got the sense that she's more like the family pet than a toy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but yes, it's sad.
</p><p>
And for all those who downmodded this sort of discussion, it shows more concern with form over function, a lack of understanding about what really makes us human. and/or a knee-jerk reaction to anything that doesn't conform to your initial perception of "don't harm the cute baby."  It's not a "cute baby" - it's a grotesque parody of a human, with no potential, no real personality (the brain has not changed since infanthood - she can't talk, and reacts the same as an infant to outside stimuli).
</p><p>
About the only positive thing to say at this point is that baby diapers are cheaper than Depends.
</p><p>
Her bones are aging at an almost normal rate, so there's no question of her living to be centuries old, and "just developing slower".  Maybe they can transplant the genes into "Chicken Little".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got the sense that she 's more like the family pet than a toy ... but yes , it 's sad .
And for all those who downmodded this sort of discussion , it shows more concern with form over function , a lack of understanding about what really makes us human .
and/or a knee-jerk reaction to anything that does n't conform to your initial perception of " do n't harm the cute baby .
" It 's not a " cute baby " - it 's a grotesque parody of a human , with no potential , no real personality ( the brain has not changed since infanthood - she ca n't talk , and reacts the same as an infant to outside stimuli ) .
About the only positive thing to say at this point is that baby diapers are cheaper than Depends .
Her bones are aging at an almost normal rate , so there 's no question of her living to be centuries old , and " just developing slower " .
Maybe they can transplant the genes into " Chicken Little " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I got the sense that she's more like the family pet than a toy ... but yes, it's sad.
And for all those who downmodded this sort of discussion, it shows more concern with form over function, a lack of understanding about what really makes us human.
and/or a knee-jerk reaction to anything that doesn't conform to your initial perception of "don't harm the cute baby.
"  It's not a "cute baby" - it's a grotesque parody of a human, with no potential, no real personality (the brain has not changed since infanthood - she can't talk, and reacts the same as an infant to outside stimuli).
About the only positive thing to say at this point is that baby diapers are cheaper than Depends.
Her bones are aging at an almost normal rate, so there's no question of her living to be centuries old, and "just developing slower".
Maybe they can transplant the genes into "Chicken Little".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483145</id>
	<title>Re:She looks retarded ...</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1246033080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Your signature argues that she SHOULD be euthanized.
</p><p>
<i>"Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is."</i>
</p><p>
That will never happen with Brooke.  Mentally, she is a plant, not an animal.  She cannot learn, since her brain doesn't grow or change.  Learning requires changes in the brain. From the article, all her behaviour at age 16 is still instinctive. Morally, offing her is no worse than cutting back the weeds.
</p><p>
Or are you going to change your sig?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your signature argues that she SHOULD be euthanized .
" Any life is made up of a single moment , the moment in which a man finds out , once and for all , who he is .
" That will never happen with Brooke .
Mentally , she is a plant , not an animal .
She can not learn , since her brain does n't grow or change .
Learning requires changes in the brain .
From the article , all her behaviour at age 16 is still instinctive .
Morally , offing her is no worse than cutting back the weeds .
Or are you going to change your sig ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Your signature argues that she SHOULD be euthanized.
"Any life is made up of a single moment, the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all, who he is.
"

That will never happen with Brooke.
Mentally, she is a plant, not an animal.
She cannot learn, since her brain doesn't grow or change.
Learning requires changes in the brain.
From the article, all her behaviour at age 16 is still instinctive.
Morally, offing her is no worse than cutting back the weeds.
Or are you going to change your sig?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482877</id>
	<title>Re:Wow...great stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew upPerhaps, but I think most parents dream of seeing their children grow up and experience the joys of life.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure that my wife would * love * it if our little girl never grew upPerhaps , but I think most parents dream of seeing their children grow up and experience the joys of life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew upPerhaps, but I think most parents dream of seeing their children grow up and experience the joys of life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482773</id>
	<title>Re:Be Careful what you wish for!</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1246031940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; While I am not aware of the particulars of this case, as a doctor I can state that myelinization of nerve cells inside the brain is what is believed to contribute to increased cognitive ability. Babies are born with roughly the number of neurons (nerve cell) they will have for the rest of their lives, however these neurons are not fully coated in myelin. Myelin increases the efficiency and conductivity of a neuron, and is synthesized by cells surrounding the neuron. However this production takes time - a few years in the case of neurons outside the brain - which explains why babies are also clumsy. Myelinization of the brain itself takes roughly 20 years.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I suspect that this patient isn't producing myelin, among other things, and therefore will never reach her cognitive potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be ?
      While I am not aware of the particulars of this case , as a doctor I can state that myelinization of nerve cells inside the brain is what is believed to contribute to increased cognitive ability .
Babies are born with roughly the number of neurons ( nerve cell ) they will have for the rest of their lives , however these neurons are not fully coated in myelin .
Myelin increases the efficiency and conductivity of a neuron , and is synthesized by cells surrounding the neuron .
However this production takes time - a few years in the case of neurons outside the brain - which explains why babies are also clumsy .
Myelinization of the brain itself takes roughly 20 years .
      I suspect that this patient is n't producing myelin , among other things , and therefore will never reach her cognitive potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?
      While I am not aware of the particulars of this case, as a doctor I can state that myelinization of nerve cells inside the brain is what is believed to contribute to increased cognitive ability.
Babies are born with roughly the number of neurons (nerve cell) they will have for the rest of their lives, however these neurons are not fully coated in myelin.
Myelin increases the efficiency and conductivity of a neuron, and is synthesized by cells surrounding the neuron.
However this production takes time - a few years in the case of neurons outside the brain - which explains why babies are also clumsy.
Myelinization of the brain itself takes roughly 20 years.
      I suspect that this patient isn't producing myelin, among other things, and therefore will never reach her cognitive potential.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487075</id>
	<title>SHOULDN'T THIS BE GIRL WHO DOESN'T GROW?</title>
	<author>Latinhypercube</author>
	<datestamp>1246048980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Surely it's that she isn't GROWING or DEVELOPING that is unique ?
There seems no evidence that she does not AGE, I am sure she will die like the rest of us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely it 's that she is n't GROWING or DEVELOPING that is unique ?
There seems no evidence that she does not AGE , I am sure she will die like the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely it's that she isn't GROWING or DEVELOPING that is unique ?
There seems no evidence that she does not AGE, I am sure she will die like the rest of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483031</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>far out, man</htmltext>
<tokenext>far out , man</tokentext>
<sentencetext>far out, man</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485561</id>
	<title>Re:the answer is in the abc article</title>
	<author>nasor</author>
	<datestamp>1246041840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Insensitivity to HGH isn't consistent with the symptoms this girl displays. For one thing, the brain's development shouldn't be affected by any HGH-related problems. People who are HGH-insensitive or HGH-deficient have normal brains in abnormally small bodies. This girl's brain, however, seems to be that of a 1.5 year old. It appears that there is some sort of "higher level" problem that is causing almost all development to proceed slowly, even though her endocrine system is normal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Insensitivity to HGH is n't consistent with the symptoms this girl displays .
For one thing , the brain 's development should n't be affected by any HGH-related problems .
People who are HGH-insensitive or HGH-deficient have normal brains in abnormally small bodies .
This girl 's brain , however , seems to be that of a 1.5 year old .
It appears that there is some sort of " higher level " problem that is causing almost all development to proceed slowly , even though her endocrine system is normal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Insensitivity to HGH isn't consistent with the symptoms this girl displays.
For one thing, the brain's development shouldn't be affected by any HGH-related problems.
People who are HGH-insensitive or HGH-deficient have normal brains in abnormally small bodies.
This girl's brain, however, seems to be that of a 1.5 year old.
It appears that there is some sort of "higher level" problem that is causing almost all development to proceed slowly, even though her endocrine system is normal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485607</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>fumblebruschi</author>
	<datestamp>1246042020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right....because "large numbers of non-doctors" have done two minutes' poking around on Google, and decided that they can now speak with authority on a subject they've never heard of until five minutes ago, therefore the kid's doctors are incompetent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right....because " large numbers of non-doctors " have done two minutes ' poking around on Google , and decided that they can now speak with authority on a subject they 've never heard of until five minutes ago , therefore the kid 's doctors are incompetent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right....because "large numbers of non-doctors" have done two minutes' poking around on Google, and decided that they can now speak with authority on a subject they've never heard of until five minutes ago, therefore the kid's doctors are incompetent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349</id>
	<title>Wow...great stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here.  Frankly, it must be tough for them at times, but I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew up.  Thank goodness her sisters are supportive, because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age.  Great stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here .
Frankly , it must be tough for them at times , but I am sure that my wife would * love * it if our little girl never grew up .
Thank goodness her sisters are supportive , because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age .
Great stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here.
Frankly, it must be tough for them at times, but I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew up.
Thank goodness her sisters are supportive, because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age.
Great stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482875</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You bring up a good point. If someone photos her in the tub, is it child pornography?<br>Granted she's likely going to be declared incompetent and be in someone's custody for the foreseeable future, but it's an odd thing to consider. Most of the laws these days state they just have to look like a minor, and in this case she doesn't even qualify as a teenager. I think this is one of those instances that prove trying to put an age number for rights is a bad idea. Some people mature at different rates, emotionally and physically. Should a 30 year old downs syndrome patient who doesn't know any better than a child really come out of the umbrella of protection minors have? Should a 16 year old who grew up on the streets after her parents died and has been forced to mature and fend for herself not be allowed to get a tatoo, open a bank account (assuming she had a penny or two), etc. This case is really an extreme illustration of the varying nature of people. I don't believe we should all be handed licenses at 16, sure there's a test, but maturity and the ability to judge proper behavior in a vehicle has no bearing on one's ability to physically control the car. This young girl could in theory apply for a license- but obviously is in no capacity to do so.</p><p>Just musing/just sayin' is all....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You bring up a good point .
If someone photos her in the tub , is it child pornography ? Granted she 's likely going to be declared incompetent and be in someone 's custody for the foreseeable future , but it 's an odd thing to consider .
Most of the laws these days state they just have to look like a minor , and in this case she does n't even qualify as a teenager .
I think this is one of those instances that prove trying to put an age number for rights is a bad idea .
Some people mature at different rates , emotionally and physically .
Should a 30 year old downs syndrome patient who does n't know any better than a child really come out of the umbrella of protection minors have ?
Should a 16 year old who grew up on the streets after her parents died and has been forced to mature and fend for herself not be allowed to get a tatoo , open a bank account ( assuming she had a penny or two ) , etc .
This case is really an extreme illustration of the varying nature of people .
I do n't believe we should all be handed licenses at 16 , sure there 's a test , but maturity and the ability to judge proper behavior in a vehicle has no bearing on one 's ability to physically control the car .
This young girl could in theory apply for a license- but obviously is in no capacity to do so.Just musing/just sayin ' is all... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You bring up a good point.
If someone photos her in the tub, is it child pornography?Granted she's likely going to be declared incompetent and be in someone's custody for the foreseeable future, but it's an odd thing to consider.
Most of the laws these days state they just have to look like a minor, and in this case she doesn't even qualify as a teenager.
I think this is one of those instances that prove trying to put an age number for rights is a bad idea.
Some people mature at different rates, emotionally and physically.
Should a 30 year old downs syndrome patient who doesn't know any better than a child really come out of the umbrella of protection minors have?
Should a 16 year old who grew up on the streets after her parents died and has been forced to mature and fend for herself not be allowed to get a tatoo, open a bank account (assuming she had a penny or two), etc.
This case is really an extreme illustration of the varying nature of people.
I don't believe we should all be handed licenses at 16, sure there's a test, but maturity and the ability to judge proper behavior in a vehicle has no bearing on one's ability to physically control the car.
This young girl could in theory apply for a license- but obviously is in no capacity to do so.Just musing/just sayin' is all....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487699</id>
	<title>What this highlights.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246008000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure someone else has brought this up, but I believe this would be a good time to point out just how much we DON'T know about our own species.</p><p>For all the technology, and breakthroughs we've had over the past century, we are still only scratching the surface of truly understanding ourselves and the environment we're in. It baffles that people think we know more than we actually do, and even more so that people turn to non-scientific based reasoning to provide solutions to real world problems. I hate to be the one to say it, but a good portion of humanity needs to wake the fuck up and realize where we are at as a civilization in the cosmos.</p><p>Here's a hint: WE ARE NOT SPECIAL, AND WE ARE NOT 'GODS'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure someone else has brought this up , but I believe this would be a good time to point out just how much we DO N'T know about our own species.For all the technology , and breakthroughs we 've had over the past century , we are still only scratching the surface of truly understanding ourselves and the environment we 're in .
It baffles that people think we know more than we actually do , and even more so that people turn to non-scientific based reasoning to provide solutions to real world problems .
I hate to be the one to say it , but a good portion of humanity needs to wake the fuck up and realize where we are at as a civilization in the cosmos.Here 's a hint : WE ARE NOT SPECIAL , AND WE ARE NOT 'GODS' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure someone else has brought this up, but I believe this would be a good time to point out just how much we DON'T know about our own species.For all the technology, and breakthroughs we've had over the past century, we are still only scratching the surface of truly understanding ourselves and the environment we're in.
It baffles that people think we know more than we actually do, and even more so that people turn to non-scientific based reasoning to provide solutions to real world problems.
I hate to be the one to say it, but a good portion of humanity needs to wake the fuck up and realize where we are at as a civilization in the cosmos.Here's a hint: WE ARE NOT SPECIAL, AND WE ARE NOT 'GODS'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484389</id>
	<title>There Can Be Only One</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1246037520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, she's going to be at a tremendous disadvantage come the Gathering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , she 's going to be at a tremendous disadvantage come the Gathering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, she's going to be at a tremendous disadvantage come the Gathering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486641</id>
	<title>Re:the answer is in the abc article</title>
	<author>ForAllTheFish</author>
	<datestamp>1246046820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i would say that this girl, uh, young woman, has an incredibly rare, unique mutation: insensitivity to human growth hormone. it would explain all of her symptoms</p></div><p>Alternately, wouldn't it also be plausable that her immune system adapted to attack growth hormones so that they cannot exist in her system at a reasonable concentration for any length of time?  This would explain why hormone therapy had little effect, and she seems to have a unique immune system from TFA.  I think this would be a (relatively!) easy thing to test for.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i would say that this girl , uh , young woman , has an incredibly rare , unique mutation : insensitivity to human growth hormone .
it would explain all of her symptomsAlternately , would n't it also be plausable that her immune system adapted to attack growth hormones so that they can not exist in her system at a reasonable concentration for any length of time ?
This would explain why hormone therapy had little effect , and she seems to have a unique immune system from TFA .
I think this would be a ( relatively !
) easy thing to test for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i would say that this girl, uh, young woman, has an incredibly rare, unique mutation: insensitivity to human growth hormone.
it would explain all of her symptomsAlternately, wouldn't it also be plausable that her immune system adapted to attack growth hormones so that they cannot exist in her system at a reasonable concentration for any length of time?
This would explain why hormone therapy had little effect, and she seems to have a unique immune system from TFA.
I think this would be a (relatively!
) easy thing to test for.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483245</id>
	<title>Re:Surgeon General's warning</title>
	<author>cpricejones</author>
	<datestamp>1246033380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do not drink from the water of life while pregnant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not drink from the water of life while pregnant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not drink from the water of life while pregnant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483051</id>
	<title>Right disease, wrong time.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a shame she didn't stop aging -at- sixteen. Then I'd be pretty intrigued too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shame she did n't stop aging -at- sixteen .
Then I 'd be pretty intrigued too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shame she didn't stop aging -at- sixteen.
Then I'd be pretty intrigued too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485581</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246041960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Old age is a feature, not a bug.</p></div><p> And a major turn off for the pedophiles. I fully expect there to be some muddying of the legal waters in a couple years when she becomes legal. As if age and appearance weren't disjointed enough already. Give this disease (syndrome?) a name, and we'll have found the new keyword for kiddy porn searches.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
And a major turn off for the pedophiles .
I fully expect there to be some muddying of the legal waters in a couple years when she becomes legal .
As if age and appearance were n't disjointed enough already .
Give this disease ( syndrome ?
) a name , and we 'll have found the new keyword for kiddy porn searches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old age is a feature, not a bug.
And a major turn off for the pedophiles.
I fully expect there to be some muddying of the legal waters in a couple years when she becomes legal.
As if age and appearance weren't disjointed enough already.
Give this disease (syndrome?
) a name, and we'll have found the new keyword for kiddy porn searches.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485921</id>
	<title>Re:Wow...great stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246043340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here. Frankly, it must be tough for them at times, but I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew up. Thank goodness her sisters are supportive, because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age. Great stuff.</p></div><p>This, I have to say, is one of the best posts here in this topic!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here .
Frankly , it must be tough for them at times , but I am sure that my wife would * love * it if our little girl never grew up .
Thank goodness her sisters are supportive , because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age .
Great stuff.This , I have to say , is one of the best posts here in this topic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow...that is absolutely amazing...and she is so fortunate to have a family that sees the situation so positively...and who supports related research by the scientific community to see if there is a potential broader benefit here.
Frankly, it must be tough for them at times, but I am sure that my wife would *love* it if our little girl never grew up.
Thank goodness her sisters are supportive, because they will most likely need to take care of her in the future after her parents advance in age.
Great stuff.This, I have to say, is one of the best posts here in this topic!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488617</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Mark\_in\_Brazil</author>
	<datestamp>1246012320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.  Her symptoms fit to the last detail.</p><p>This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.  The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.</p></div><p>Uh, yeah... specialists at hospitals and universities just don't have the knowledge and skills you do.  They apparently can't use teh Google to discover that the child's symptoms fit primordial dwarfism "to the last detail."  Of course, the reason they can't is because... well, because her symptoms <b>don't</b> fit primordial dwarfism to the last detail.</p><p>
Maybe the "incompetent" doctors have read about primordial dwarfism and know that there are five or six types of primordial dwarfism.  Seckel syndrome can be immediately rejected because the child does not have microcephaly.  The fact that she's non-microcephalic also reduces the probability that she has MOPD1 or MOPD2 (Majewski Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism types 1 and 2).  Since her bone structure is not abnormal in the ways expected from MOPD1 and MOPD2 (short vertebrae, long clavicles, bowed femora ("femurs"), and hip dislocation for MOPD1; dislocations of joints in the elbows, knees and hips and scoliosis for MOPD2), those two are out the window.  The fact that none of the articles say she has no corpus callosum also makes it very improbable that she has MOPD2.  As for Meier-Gorlin syndrome, the fact that she has kneecaps eliminates that possibility.  I've seen MOPD3 mentioned, but not described in detail; it may or may not be completely accepted as a separate category of PD.</p><p>At <a href="http://www.primordialdwarfism.com/" title="primordialdwarfism.com">Primordial Dwarfism dot com</a> [primordialdwarfism.com], there is information about sending kids with PD to school.  If you take a lot of it (y'know, doing a Google search or something, like you claimed her "incompetent" doctors can't do), it becomes really clear that their brain development is very, very different from that of Brooke Greenberg.  Brooke at 16 has the mind of a toddler, and a good deal of that appears to stem largely from the fact that her brain does not appear to have aged in a way even similar to normal.  Individuals with primordial dwarfism tend to have squeaky voices, among other things, but their cognitive development, even when there are problems, is a lot different from the descriptions of Brooke Greenberg's cognitive development (or total lack thereof, apart from the projection of wishes by family members, identifying her toddler-ish behavior as being that of a "rebellious teenager").</p><p>Other than short stature, Brooke's symptoms really aren't at all similar to those of any of the varieties of primordial dwarfism, and yet you claimed they fit "to the last detail."  I'd like to know on what that conclusion was based.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'child ' is a primordial dwarf .
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already , probably several other sites as well , and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition .
The poor kid 's doctors either do n't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.Uh , yeah... specialists at hospitals and universities just do n't have the knowledge and skills you do .
They apparently ca n't use teh Google to discover that the child 's symptoms fit primordial dwarfism " to the last detail .
" Of course , the reason they ca n't is because... well , because her symptoms do n't fit primordial dwarfism to the last detail .
Maybe the " incompetent " doctors have read about primordial dwarfism and know that there are five or six types of primordial dwarfism .
Seckel syndrome can be immediately rejected because the child does not have microcephaly .
The fact that she 's non-microcephalic also reduces the probability that she has MOPD1 or MOPD2 ( Majewski Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism types 1 and 2 ) .
Since her bone structure is not abnormal in the ways expected from MOPD1 and MOPD2 ( short vertebrae , long clavicles , bowed femora ( " femurs " ) , and hip dislocation for MOPD1 ; dislocations of joints in the elbows , knees and hips and scoliosis for MOPD2 ) , those two are out the window .
The fact that none of the articles say she has no corpus callosum also makes it very improbable that she has MOPD2 .
As for Meier-Gorlin syndrome , the fact that she has kneecaps eliminates that possibility .
I 've seen MOPD3 mentioned , but not described in detail ; it may or may not be completely accepted as a separate category of PD.At Primordial Dwarfism dot com [ primordialdwarfism.com ] , there is information about sending kids with PD to school .
If you take a lot of it ( y'know , doing a Google search or something , like you claimed her " incompetent " doctors ca n't do ) , it becomes really clear that their brain development is very , very different from that of Brooke Greenberg .
Brooke at 16 has the mind of a toddler , and a good deal of that appears to stem largely from the fact that her brain does not appear to have aged in a way even similar to normal .
Individuals with primordial dwarfism tend to have squeaky voices , among other things , but their cognitive development , even when there are problems , is a lot different from the descriptions of Brooke Greenberg 's cognitive development ( or total lack thereof , apart from the projection of wishes by family members , identifying her toddler-ish behavior as being that of a " rebellious teenager " ) .Other than short stature , Brooke 's symptoms really are n't at all similar to those of any of the varieties of primordial dwarfism , and yet you claimed they fit " to the last detail .
" I 'd like to know on what that conclusion was based .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'child' is a primordial dwarf.
Her symptoms fit to the last detail.This story has done time on Digg and Fark already, probably several other sites as well, and it seems everywhere large numbers of non-doctors can use Google to compare her symptoms to a RARE but known medical condition.
The poor kid's doctors either don't know how to research or are otherwise incompetent.Uh, yeah... specialists at hospitals and universities just don't have the knowledge and skills you do.
They apparently can't use teh Google to discover that the child's symptoms fit primordial dwarfism "to the last detail.
"  Of course, the reason they can't is because... well, because her symptoms don't fit primordial dwarfism to the last detail.
Maybe the "incompetent" doctors have read about primordial dwarfism and know that there are five or six types of primordial dwarfism.
Seckel syndrome can be immediately rejected because the child does not have microcephaly.
The fact that she's non-microcephalic also reduces the probability that she has MOPD1 or MOPD2 (Majewski Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism types 1 and 2).
Since her bone structure is not abnormal in the ways expected from MOPD1 and MOPD2 (short vertebrae, long clavicles, bowed femora ("femurs"), and hip dislocation for MOPD1; dislocations of joints in the elbows, knees and hips and scoliosis for MOPD2), those two are out the window.
The fact that none of the articles say she has no corpus callosum also makes it very improbable that she has MOPD2.
As for Meier-Gorlin syndrome, the fact that she has kneecaps eliminates that possibility.
I've seen MOPD3 mentioned, but not described in detail; it may or may not be completely accepted as a separate category of PD.At Primordial Dwarfism dot com [primordialdwarfism.com], there is information about sending kids with PD to school.
If you take a lot of it (y'know, doing a Google search or something, like you claimed her "incompetent" doctors can't do), it becomes really clear that their brain development is very, very different from that of Brooke Greenberg.
Brooke at 16 has the mind of a toddler, and a good deal of that appears to stem largely from the fact that her brain does not appear to have aged in a way even similar to normal.
Individuals with primordial dwarfism tend to have squeaky voices, among other things, but their cognitive development, even when there are problems, is a lot different from the descriptions of Brooke Greenberg's cognitive development (or total lack thereof, apart from the projection of wishes by family members, identifying her toddler-ish behavior as being that of a "rebellious teenager").Other than short stature, Brooke's symptoms really aren't at all similar to those of any of the varieties of primordial dwarfism, and yet you claimed they fit "to the last detail.
"  I'd like to know on what that conclusion was based.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482801</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTF?  Insightful?!?!?!

<p>Sick bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Insightful ? ! ? ! ? ! Sick bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Insightful?!?!?!

Sick bastards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484579</id>
	<title>Just as a totally random uninformed observation</title>
	<author>bill\_kress</author>
	<datestamp>1246038180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Were I reading this as a fantasy or sci-fi book, I'd say her power sounds more like healing than anti-aging.</p><p>Even when they gave her growth hormones she just stayed the same, and she grew a brain tumor then healed it.  This kind of thing (Developing a serious problem then healing it on her own) has happened throughout her young life.</p><p>Her body just seems to resist any change at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Were I reading this as a fantasy or sci-fi book , I 'd say her power sounds more like healing than anti-aging.Even when they gave her growth hormones she just stayed the same , and she grew a brain tumor then healed it .
This kind of thing ( Developing a serious problem then healing it on her own ) has happened throughout her young life.Her body just seems to resist any change at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Were I reading this as a fantasy or sci-fi book, I'd say her power sounds more like healing than anti-aging.Even when they gave her growth hormones she just stayed the same, and she grew a brain tumor then healed it.
This kind of thing (Developing a serious problem then healing it on her own) has happened throughout her young life.Her body just seems to resist any change at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484743</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246038720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Her cells will stop dividing the same as everyone elses.  No form of genetic abnormality could change that.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Her cells will stop dividing the same as everyone elses .
No form of genetic abnormality could change that.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her cells will stop dividing the same as everyone elses.
No form of genetic abnormality could change that.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825</id>
	<title>the answer is in the abc article</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1246032060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke's life, but the treatment produced no results.</p><p>Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist. "We took her back in six months, and the doctor looked at us and said, 'Why didn't you give Brooke the growth hormones?' And I said, 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones. We gave her everything you told us to do.' And Brooke didn't put on a pound, an ounce; she didn't grow an inch."</p></div></blockquote><p>not that i know a damn thing about endocrinology, but i would speculate that this failed therapy suggest that, as we all have receptors for various hormones, her body has no such receptors for HGH. if someone is born genetically male, but has no male secondary characteristics, then either:<br>1. his body produces no testosterone,<br>2. his body produces testosterone, but his body doesn't react to it</p><p>i would say that this girl, uh, young woman, has an incredibly rare, unique mutation: insensitivity to human growth hormone. it would explain all of her symptoms</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke 's life , but the treatment produced no results.Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist .
" We took her back in six months , and the doctor looked at us and said , 'Why did n't you give Brooke the growth hormones ?
' And I said , 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones .
We gave her everything you told us to do .
' And Brooke did n't put on a pound , an ounce ; she did n't grow an inch .
" not that i know a damn thing about endocrinology , but i would speculate that this failed therapy suggest that , as we all have receptors for various hormones , her body has no such receptors for HGH .
if someone is born genetically male , but has no male secondary characteristics , then either : 1. his body produces no testosterone,2 .
his body produces testosterone , but his body does n't react to iti would say that this girl , uh , young woman , has an incredibly rare , unique mutation : insensitivity to human growth hormone .
it would explain all of her symptoms</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctors recommended growth hormone therapy early in Brooke's life, but the treatment produced no results.Howard Greenberg recalled the follow-up visit to the endocrinologist.
"We took her back in six months, and the doctor looked at us and said, 'Why didn't you give Brooke the growth hormones?
' And I said, 'We gave Brooke the growth hormones.
We gave her everything you told us to do.
' And Brooke didn't put on a pound, an ounce; she didn't grow an inch.
"not that i know a damn thing about endocrinology, but i would speculate that this failed therapy suggest that, as we all have receptors for various hormones, her body has no such receptors for HGH.
if someone is born genetically male, but has no male secondary characteristics, then either:1. his body produces no testosterone,2.
his body produces testosterone, but his body doesn't react to iti would say that this girl, uh, young woman, has an incredibly rare, unique mutation: insensitivity to human growth hormone.
it would explain all of her symptoms
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485015</id>
	<title>Re:Be Careful what you wish for!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246039740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?</p></div><p>Nature is wise!<br>Imagine she had a normal mental capacity of a 16 year old girl...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be ? Nature is wise ! Imagine she had a normal mental capacity of a 16 year old girl.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I wonder what the cause of diminished mental capacity might be?Nature is wise!Imagine she had a normal mental capacity of a 16 year old girl...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482903</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to age or failure to grow?</title>
	<author>lorenzo.boccaccia</author>
	<datestamp>1246032300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>according to the news, he already developed a lot of nasty disease, and even had a brain surgery. details are scarce, but longer lifespan as if living a slow life seems a remote option.</htmltext>
<tokenext>according to the news , he already developed a lot of nasty disease , and even had a brain surgery .
details are scarce , but longer lifespan as if living a slow life seems a remote option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>according to the news, he already developed a lot of nasty disease, and even had a brain surgery.
details are scarce, but longer lifespan as if living a slow life seems a remote option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485771</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1246042620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Surely they should live extremely long lives by now, since they do not need to "make room" for new editions.</i> </p><p>
And where your analogy falls down there is that some fish are, as far as we can tell, immortal. Catfish, for example...what kills them is the fact they continue to grow, and eventually cannot function in their environment.</p><p>
Whale sharks, meanwhile, apparently can live 100 years.</p><p>
That said, aging has more to do with the rate of reproduction and of death than what 'niche' they're in. Elephants, for example, are pretty close to humans in reproduction and death rate, and they live for about 70 years. (Which is about how long humans live without medical care.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely they should live extremely long lives by now , since they do not need to " make room " for new editions .
And where your analogy falls down there is that some fish are , as far as we can tell , immortal .
Catfish , for example...what kills them is the fact they continue to grow , and eventually can not function in their environment .
Whale sharks , meanwhile , apparently can live 100 years .
That said , aging has more to do with the rate of reproduction and of death than what 'niche ' they 're in .
Elephants , for example , are pretty close to humans in reproduction and death rate , and they live for about 70 years .
( Which is about how long humans live without medical care .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Surely they should live extremely long lives by now, since they do not need to "make room" for new editions.
And where your analogy falls down there is that some fish are, as far as we can tell, immortal.
Catfish, for example...what kills them is the fact they continue to grow, and eventually cannot function in their environment.
Whale sharks, meanwhile, apparently can live 100 years.
That said, aging has more to do with the rate of reproduction and of death than what 'niche' they're in.
Elephants, for example, are pretty close to humans in reproduction and death rate, and they live for about 70 years.
(Which is about how long humans live without medical care.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484403</id>
	<title>Cellular age appears normal...</title>
	<author>vix86</author>
	<datestamp>1246037580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something the article failed to mention was that her telomeres were still progressing like they would in a normal person.<p><div class="quote"><p>As seen in Fig. 6, the subject's PBMC telomere length at 13 years of age was significantly shorter than that of an age-matched female control as well as male and female controls of younger ages. While variability in average telomere length exists between individuals, the low subject values are probably not due to errors in measurement since the coefficients of variation were sufficiently low to assume adequate precision. Although the subject's telomeres were nearly half the length of a healthy, age-matched female control, this comparison in and of itself does not prove that her cellular age is advanced beyond that of the normal girl. However, an important observation relevant to this difference is that there occurs a precipitous loss of telomere length during early life after which a plateau period is reached (Frenck et al., 1998). As a result, telomere length in newborns is longer on average than that in adolescents so that comparison of the subject's telomeres with newborn controls would be expected to provide more reliable estimate of her cellular age range. For example, significant shortening would be expected if her cellular age proceeded as usual despite her severe developmental delay whereas longer telomeres would suggest that her cellular aging was delayed consistent with that of her somatic development. However, this was not the case. Subject's telomeres were considerably shorter than those of both infant controls as well as the age-matched control suggesting that her cellular age was advanced beyond infancy. Since the rate of telomeric shortening is substantially greater in infants than in adults (Zeichner et al., 1999), subject's prolonged infancy may have caused her to have shorter telomeres than age-matched controls. In addition, accelerated telomeric shortening has been reported in developmentally abnormal conditions including progeroid syndromes (Kruk et al., 1995). These circumstances may have resulted in her cellular age being appropriate for or perhaps even greater than her chronological age. Consistent with other reports showing a lack of telomerase (telomere terminal transferase) expression in human dermal fibroblasts from children (O&#226;(TM)Donnell et al., 2008), subject's fibroblasts were telomerase negative. This fact suggests that possible enhancement of telomeric erosion did not stimulate compensatory increases in enzyme activity.</p></div><p>Pulled from:
Richard F. Walker, Lawrence C. Pakula, Maxine J. Sutcliffe, Patricia A. Kruk, Jesper Graakjaer, Jerry W. Shay, A case study of 'disorganized development' and its possible relevance to genetic determinants of aging, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, Volume 130, Issue 5, May 2009, Pages 350-356, ISSN 0047-6374, DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2009.02.003.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something the article failed to mention was that her telomeres were still progressing like they would in a normal person.As seen in Fig .
6 , the subject 's PBMC telomere length at 13 years of age was significantly shorter than that of an age-matched female control as well as male and female controls of younger ages .
While variability in average telomere length exists between individuals , the low subject values are probably not due to errors in measurement since the coefficients of variation were sufficiently low to assume adequate precision .
Although the subject 's telomeres were nearly half the length of a healthy , age-matched female control , this comparison in and of itself does not prove that her cellular age is advanced beyond that of the normal girl .
However , an important observation relevant to this difference is that there occurs a precipitous loss of telomere length during early life after which a plateau period is reached ( Frenck et al. , 1998 ) .
As a result , telomere length in newborns is longer on average than that in adolescents so that comparison of the subject 's telomeres with newborn controls would be expected to provide more reliable estimate of her cellular age range .
For example , significant shortening would be expected if her cellular age proceeded as usual despite her severe developmental delay whereas longer telomeres would suggest that her cellular aging was delayed consistent with that of her somatic development .
However , this was not the case .
Subject 's telomeres were considerably shorter than those of both infant controls as well as the age-matched control suggesting that her cellular age was advanced beyond infancy .
Since the rate of telomeric shortening is substantially greater in infants than in adults ( Zeichner et al. , 1999 ) , subject 's prolonged infancy may have caused her to have shorter telomeres than age-matched controls .
In addition , accelerated telomeric shortening has been reported in developmentally abnormal conditions including progeroid syndromes ( Kruk et al. , 1995 ) .
These circumstances may have resulted in her cellular age being appropriate for or perhaps even greater than her chronological age .
Consistent with other reports showing a lack of telomerase ( telomere terminal transferase ) expression in human dermal fibroblasts from children ( O   ( TM ) Donnell et al. , 2008 ) , subject 's fibroblasts were telomerase negative .
This fact suggests that possible enhancement of telomeric erosion did not stimulate compensatory increases in enzyme activity.Pulled from : Richard F. Walker , Lawrence C. Pakula , Maxine J. Sutcliffe , Patricia A. Kruk , Jesper Graakjaer , Jerry W. Shay , A case study of 'disorganized development ' and its possible relevance to genetic determinants of aging , Mechanisms of Ageing and Development , Volume 130 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , Pages 350-356 , ISSN 0047-6374 , DOI : 10.1016/j.mad.2009.02.003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something the article failed to mention was that her telomeres were still progressing like they would in a normal person.As seen in Fig.
6, the subject's PBMC telomere length at 13 years of age was significantly shorter than that of an age-matched female control as well as male and female controls of younger ages.
While variability in average telomere length exists between individuals, the low subject values are probably not due to errors in measurement since the coefficients of variation were sufficiently low to assume adequate precision.
Although the subject's telomeres were nearly half the length of a healthy, age-matched female control, this comparison in and of itself does not prove that her cellular age is advanced beyond that of the normal girl.
However, an important observation relevant to this difference is that there occurs a precipitous loss of telomere length during early life after which a plateau period is reached (Frenck et al., 1998).
As a result, telomere length in newborns is longer on average than that in adolescents so that comparison of the subject's telomeres with newborn controls would be expected to provide more reliable estimate of her cellular age range.
For example, significant shortening would be expected if her cellular age proceeded as usual despite her severe developmental delay whereas longer telomeres would suggest that her cellular aging was delayed consistent with that of her somatic development.
However, this was not the case.
Subject's telomeres were considerably shorter than those of both infant controls as well as the age-matched control suggesting that her cellular age was advanced beyond infancy.
Since the rate of telomeric shortening is substantially greater in infants than in adults (Zeichner et al., 1999), subject's prolonged infancy may have caused her to have shorter telomeres than age-matched controls.
In addition, accelerated telomeric shortening has been reported in developmentally abnormal conditions including progeroid syndromes (Kruk et al., 1995).
These circumstances may have resulted in her cellular age being appropriate for or perhaps even greater than her chronological age.
Consistent with other reports showing a lack of telomerase (telomere terminal transferase) expression in human dermal fibroblasts from children (Oâ(TM)Donnell et al., 2008), subject's fibroblasts were telomerase negative.
This fact suggests that possible enhancement of telomeric erosion did not stimulate compensatory increases in enzyme activity.Pulled from:
Richard F. Walker, Lawrence C. Pakula, Maxine J. Sutcliffe, Patricia A. Kruk, Jesper Graakjaer, Jerry W. Shay, A case study of 'disorganized development' and its possible relevance to genetic determinants of aging, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, Volume 130, Issue 5, May 2009, Pages 350-356, ISSN 0047-6374, DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2009.02.003.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489921</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>Baron\_Yam</author>
	<datestamp>1246020960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism, Type II (ODPDII)<br>Those who have ODPDII often have further medical issues than the other types such as a squeaky voice, microdontia, widely spaced primary teeth, poor sleep patterns (in early years), delayed mental development, frequent sickness, breathing problems, eating problems, hyperactivity, farsightedness, and do not respond to hormone therapy because primordial dwarfism is not caused by a lack of any growth hormone. After reviewing x-rays it is also found that many have dislocated joints, scoliosis, and delayed bone age as well as microcephaly. They will not reach the size of an average newborn until they are between the ages of 3-5. "</p><p>Hmm... doesn't sound AT ALL like this girl, does it?  I mean, the slow growth, microcephaly, breathing problems, eating problems, doesn't respond to hormone therapy.  What the quoted Wikipedia item doesn't mention is another match - bones that appear much younger than they are.</p><p>In short, IT MATCHES.  Thanks to the ignoramouses who flamed me and those who modded me down without, you know, doing some checking first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism , Type II ( ODPDII ) Those who have ODPDII often have further medical issues than the other types such as a squeaky voice , microdontia , widely spaced primary teeth , poor sleep patterns ( in early years ) , delayed mental development , frequent sickness , breathing problems , eating problems , hyperactivity , farsightedness , and do not respond to hormone therapy because primordial dwarfism is not caused by a lack of any growth hormone .
After reviewing x-rays it is also found that many have dislocated joints , scoliosis , and delayed bone age as well as microcephaly .
They will not reach the size of an average newborn until they are between the ages of 3-5 .
" Hmm... does n't sound AT ALL like this girl , does it ?
I mean , the slow growth , microcephaly , breathing problems , eating problems , does n't respond to hormone therapy .
What the quoted Wikipedia item does n't mention is another match - bones that appear much younger than they are.In short , IT MATCHES .
Thanks to the ignoramouses who flamed me and those who modded me down without , you know , doing some checking first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism, Type II (ODPDII)Those who have ODPDII often have further medical issues than the other types such as a squeaky voice, microdontia, widely spaced primary teeth, poor sleep patterns (in early years), delayed mental development, frequent sickness, breathing problems, eating problems, hyperactivity, farsightedness, and do not respond to hormone therapy because primordial dwarfism is not caused by a lack of any growth hormone.
After reviewing x-rays it is also found that many have dislocated joints, scoliosis, and delayed bone age as well as microcephaly.
They will not reach the size of an average newborn until they are between the ages of 3-5.
"Hmm... doesn't sound AT ALL like this girl, does it?
I mean, the slow growth, microcephaly, breathing problems, eating problems, doesn't respond to hormone therapy.
What the quoted Wikipedia item doesn't mention is another match - bones that appear much younger than they are.In short, IT MATCHES.
Thanks to the ignoramouses who flamed me and those who modded me down without, you know, doing some checking first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482849</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246032180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but scientifically that makes no sense. You die mainly because of cell damage accumulation (although there are other factors involved). Even if her mutation is making her somehow age slower, it doesn't mean that her cells will magically accumulate less damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but scientifically that makes no sense .
You die mainly because of cell damage accumulation ( although there are other factors involved ) .
Even if her mutation is making her somehow age slower , it does n't mean that her cells will magically accumulate less damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but scientifically that makes no sense.
You die mainly because of cell damage accumulation (although there are other factors involved).
Even if her mutation is making her somehow age slower, it doesn't mean that her cells will magically accumulate less damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484689</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to age or failure to grow?</title>
	<author>molnarcs</author>
	<datestamp>1246038480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.  This is quite something else.</p><p>It is not so much failure to age, as failure to grow/mature.  It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice.</p></div><p>

Don't forget that it's not just about growth. She gets terminal diseases (like brain cancer) for no good reason than they <b>vanish without a trace</b> in a few weeks. Everyone is focused on the growth/maturity issue - I think this aspect of her condition as at least if not more interesting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing .
This is quite something else.It is not so much failure to age , as failure to grow/mature .
It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice .
Do n't forget that it 's not just about growth .
She gets terminal diseases ( like brain cancer ) for no good reason than they vanish without a trace in a few weeks .
Everyone is focused on the growth/maturity issue - I think this aspect of her condition as at least if not more interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reaching adulthood and then preserving the body of a 20-year-old forever is one thing.
This is quite something else.It is not so much failure to age, as failure to grow/mature.
It remains to be seen whether her abnormality will grant longer life span in practice.
Don't forget that it's not just about growth.
She gets terminal diseases (like brain cancer) for no good reason than they vanish without a trace in a few weeks.
Everyone is focused on the growth/maturity issue - I think this aspect of her condition as at least if not more interesting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482755</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246031880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Insightful?? I know its a joke... but insightful?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Insightful ? ?
I know its a joke... but insightful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Insightful??
I know its a joke... but insightful?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485727</id>
	<title>Red Wine?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246042500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did Mom drink lots of red wine while pregnant?</p><p>So, if I have sex with her when she turns 18, does that make me a pedophile?<br>If I take a photograph of her face and digitally place it onto a 30 yr old nude pinup photo, will I be charged under Tenn law?<br>If I take a photograph of her nude at 18 yrs old, will I be charged under Tenn law?</p><p>Ok, what if I "believe" the photo is from her at age 18. Does that make this all ok?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did Mom drink lots of red wine while pregnant ? So , if I have sex with her when she turns 18 , does that make me a pedophile ? If I take a photograph of her face and digitally place it onto a 30 yr old nude pinup photo , will I be charged under Tenn law ? If I take a photograph of her nude at 18 yrs old , will I be charged under Tenn law ? Ok , what if I " believe " the photo is from her at age 18 .
Does that make this all ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did Mom drink lots of red wine while pregnant?So, if I have sex with her when she turns 18, does that make me a pedophile?If I take a photograph of her face and digitally place it onto a 30 yr old nude pinup photo, will I be charged under Tenn law?If I take a photograph of her nude at 18 yrs old, will I be charged under Tenn law?Ok, what if I "believe" the photo is from her at age 18.
Does that make this all ok?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1246033260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.</i> </p><p>What if we have it backwards?</p><p>What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?</p><p>So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old?!</p></div><p>If she currently has the intellect of a four year old, then I am not too optimistic about her ever living a normal life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It just struck me reading that... it must really , REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease .
What if we have it backwards ? What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow ? So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old ?
! If she currently has the intellect of a four year old , then I am not too optimistic about her ever living a normal life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It just struck me reading that... it must really, REALLY suck being the first person to ever have a particular disease.
What if we have it backwards?What if she is the first person not to have the disease we all have and that she is aging but really really slow?So in 100 years she will have the body of an 18 year old?
!If she currently has the intellect of a four year old, then I am not too optimistic about her ever living a normal life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483683</id>
	<title>Great House Episode</title>
	<author>Requiem18th</author>
	<datestamp>1246034880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And all i can think is what a great House MD episode would that be!</p><p>Also that "Greenberg syndrome" sounds nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And all i can think is what a great House MD episode would that be ! Also that " Greenberg syndrome " sounds nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all i can think is what a great House MD episode would that be!Also that "Greenberg syndrome" sounds nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483295</id>
	<title>As a psych major</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246033560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults. What's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with.</p></div><p>It's interesting, and everyone loves Erickson's stages (and even Freud's).  Too bad there's little to no empirical evidence.  But this is the internet, who needs the scientific method?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that , if followed honestly , usually lead to children becoming very capable , healthy adults .
What 's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with.It 's interesting , and everyone loves Erickson 's stages ( and even Freud 's ) .
Too bad there 's little to no empirical evidence .
But this is the internet , who needs the scientific method ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like how there are stages in raising a child that, if followed honestly, usually lead to children becoming very capable, healthy adults.
What's even more interesting is what happens to a child should the development of any of those stages be tampered with.It's interesting, and everyone loves Erickson's stages (and even Freud's).
Too bad there's little to no empirical evidence.
But this is the internet, who needs the scientific method?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482567</id>
	<title>Re:She seems to grow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246031400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Christians everywhere come up with a new excuse for Noah being 500 years old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Christians everywhere come up with a new excuse for Noah being 500 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Christians everywhere come up with a new excuse for Noah being 500 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397</id>
	<title>Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>taucross</author>
	<datestamp>1246030920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Her body is not developing as a co-ordinated unit because her environment (humanity) isn't either. These kind of deviations within nature will continue to become more apparent as humans evolve. As long as we continue to grow egoistically, separated from one another, we will be as cancer cells rather than living tissue - working for the benefit of ourselves rather than each other. We are all complicit in her abnormality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Her body is not developing as a co-ordinated unit because her environment ( humanity ) is n't either .
These kind of deviations within nature will continue to become more apparent as humans evolve .
As long as we continue to grow egoistically , separated from one another , we will be as cancer cells rather than living tissue - working for the benefit of ourselves rather than each other .
We are all complicit in her abnormality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her body is not developing as a co-ordinated unit because her environment (humanity) isn't either.
These kind of deviations within nature will continue to become more apparent as humans evolve.
As long as we continue to grow egoistically, separated from one another, we will be as cancer cells rather than living tissue - working for the benefit of ourselves rather than each other.
We are all complicit in her abnormality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483805</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246035300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Old age is a feature, not a bug. With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment. It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual. Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.</p><p>Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature, and were superseded by others who had it.</p></div><p>The question of what causes age has been answered satisfactorily for some time. The cause is the fact that selective pressure decreases with age on account of mishaps associated with being alive. For example, after 10 years, a fly not subject to old age will have a far greater chance of being eaten by a spider than a 10-day old fly, so whatever genes allowed the former to live that long are most likely already lost.</p><p>By contrast, your off-the-cuff theory is hard to support. What of sharks, or other organisms that have hardly changed at all since prehistoric times? Surely they should live extremely long lives by now, since they do not need to "make room" for new editions.</p><p>The whole idea of "making room" for new versions is curious, because if the new versions are indeed superior, they should be able to out-compete the old versions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old age is a feature , not a bug .
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment .
It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual .
Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature , and were superseded by others who had it.The question of what causes age has been answered satisfactorily for some time .
The cause is the fact that selective pressure decreases with age on account of mishaps associated with being alive .
For example , after 10 years , a fly not subject to old age will have a far greater chance of being eaten by a spider than a 10-day old fly , so whatever genes allowed the former to live that long are most likely already lost.By contrast , your off-the-cuff theory is hard to support .
What of sharks , or other organisms that have hardly changed at all since prehistoric times ?
Surely they should live extremely long lives by now , since they do not need to " make room " for new editions.The whole idea of " making room " for new versions is curious , because if the new versions are indeed superior , they should be able to out-compete the old versions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old age is a feature, not a bug.
With less turn-over it would be difficult to life as a whole to adapt to changing environment.
It has drawbacks as knowledge lost by the dead individual.
Advanced life forms overcome that with culture.Earlier simpler life forms probably lacked the aging feature, and were superseded by others who had it.The question of what causes age has been answered satisfactorily for some time.
The cause is the fact that selective pressure decreases with age on account of mishaps associated with being alive.
For example, after 10 years, a fly not subject to old age will have a far greater chance of being eaten by a spider than a 10-day old fly, so whatever genes allowed the former to live that long are most likely already lost.By contrast, your off-the-cuff theory is hard to support.
What of sharks, or other organisms that have hardly changed at all since prehistoric times?
Surely they should live extremely long lives by now, since they do not need to "make room" for new editions.The whole idea of "making room" for new versions is curious, because if the new versions are indeed superior, they should be able to out-compete the old versions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28497357</id>
	<title>Re:Why won't this story die?</title>
	<author>ConceptJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1246094880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If large numbers of non-doctors using Google had any reliability at all, real doctors would have been out of business years ago.</p><p>I hate to break it to you, but it's possible the situation is little more complex than something that can be diagnosed by reading a news article and doing a web search.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If large numbers of non-doctors using Google had any reliability at all , real doctors would have been out of business years ago.I hate to break it to you , but it 's possible the situation is little more complex than something that can be diagnosed by reading a news article and doing a web search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If large numbers of non-doctors using Google had any reliability at all, real doctors would have been out of business years ago.I hate to break it to you, but it's possible the situation is little more complex than something that can be diagnosed by reading a news article and doing a web search.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484265</id>
	<title>Re:Brooke is a deviation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246037100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least give credit where credit is due.</p><p>Billy Madison (1995)<br><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112508/quotes" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112508/quotes</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least give credit where credit is due.Billy Madison ( 1995 ) http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0112508/quotes [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least give credit where credit is due.Billy Madison (1995)http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112508/quotes [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482323</id>
	<title>Re:I don't have anything really smart to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246030740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that you might get it named after. Not really much of a consolation though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that you might get it named after .
Not really much of a consolation though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that you might get it named after.
Not really much of a consolation though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28497357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28528001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28496859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28507881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491389
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28500489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28492491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485389
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28493777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_26_1342215_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482833
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483203
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491891
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485029
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486335
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483171
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484041
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483557
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483605
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489517
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486789
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485807
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485581
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491213
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488489
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483997
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483525
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488965
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487859
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484627
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483639
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483805
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482421
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483145
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482543
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491389
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482863
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482921
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482939
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483291
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485389
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482113
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28493777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28507881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483057
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486769
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28489921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28497357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28488617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485491
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28487289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484551
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482807
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28492491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28491181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482961
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28500489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28528001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28484743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482849
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28482567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28485071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28486773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28496859
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_26_1342215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_26_1342215.28483067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
