<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_22_1616239</id>
	<title>NIH Spends $400K To Figure Out Why Men Don't Like Condoms</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1245668340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>The National Institutes of Health has given $423,500 to researchers at Indiana University's Kinsey Institute to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/19/nih-funds-study-men-dont-like-use-condoms/">figure out why men don't like to wear condoms</a>. The institute will also study why men have trouble using condoms and investigate "penile erection and sensitivity during condom application." "The project aims to understand the relationship between condom application and loss of erections and decreased sensation, including the role of condom skills and performance anxiety, and to find new ways to improve condom use among those who experience such problems," reads the abstract from Drs. Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders, both of the Kinsey Institute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The National Institutes of Health has given $ 423,500 to researchers at Indiana University 's Kinsey Institute to figure out why men do n't like to wear condoms .
The institute will also study why men have trouble using condoms and investigate " penile erection and sensitivity during condom application .
" " The project aims to understand the relationship between condom application and loss of erections and decreased sensation , including the role of condom skills and performance anxiety , and to find new ways to improve condom use among those who experience such problems , " reads the abstract from Drs .
Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders , both of the Kinsey Institute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The National Institutes of Health has given $423,500 to researchers at Indiana University's Kinsey Institute to figure out why men don't like to wear condoms.
The institute will also study why men have trouble using condoms and investigate "penile erection and sensitivity during condom application.
" "The project aims to understand the relationship between condom application and loss of erections and decreased sensation, including the role of condom skills and performance anxiety, and to find new ways to improve condom use among those who experience such problems," reads the abstract from Drs.
Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders, both of the Kinsey Institute.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431859</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1245676020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</p></div><p>Ribbed for his pleasure alone?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether.Ribbed for his pleasure alone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.Ribbed for his pleasure alone?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431191</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Xistenz99</author>
	<datestamp>1245673380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You said "thrust"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You said " thrust "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You said "thrust"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439313</id>
	<title>Re:I research condom use in teens...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245773640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Re:I research condom use in teens...</p></div><p>Really? Noone caught this?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Re : I research condom use in teens...Really ?
Noone caught this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Re:I research condom use in teens...Really?
Noone caught this?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>xednieht</author>
	<datestamp>1245677700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Letting them die costs nothing.<br> <br>
We live, we F*CK, we die</htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting them die costs nothing .
We live , we F * CK , we die</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting them die costs nothing.
We live, we F*CK, we die</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430843</id>
	<title>Volunteers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd volunteer to test the sensation part.</p><p>Also kinda funny that the mp3 graphic to post came up with womanly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd volunteer to test the sensation part.Also kinda funny that the mp3 graphic to post came up with womanly : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd volunteer to test the sensation part.Also kinda funny that the mp3 graphic to post came up with womanly :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432525</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245679080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And what are the odds that two unrelated females will wander into your parents' basement over the next four years (not counting female cats).</htmltext>
<tokenext>And what are the odds that two unrelated females will wander into your parents ' basement over the next four years ( not counting female cats ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what are the odds that two unrelated females will wander into your parents' basement over the next four years (not counting female cats).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440895</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245779700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend "went off the pill" in a, what he says, deliberate attempt to get pregnant. So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her. Few years later they got married. Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself.</p></div><p>Sounds like my first marriage, only without the vasectomy part, and with a kid added in there. My ex didn't tell me she went off the pill.</p><p>The batshit insane and committed part is definitely part of my story, along with a couple of shoplifting arrests on her part.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend " went off the pill " in a , what he says , deliberate attempt to get pregnant .
So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her .
Few years later they got married .
Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself.Sounds like my first marriage , only without the vasectomy part , and with a kid added in there .
My ex did n't tell me she went off the pill.The batshit insane and committed part is definitely part of my story , along with a couple of shoplifting arrests on her part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend "went off the pill" in a, what he says, deliberate attempt to get pregnant.
So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her.
Few years later they got married.
Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself.Sounds like my first marriage, only without the vasectomy part, and with a kid added in there.
My ex didn't tell me she went off the pill.The batshit insane and committed part is definitely part of my story, along with a couple of shoplifting arrests on her part.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433349</id>
	<title>THEY HURT!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245683340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact of some men use condoms all the time, some not, is meaningless.  It is irrelevant.  Condoms are unpleasant and often painful.  Some men will do the right thing and just be happy enough to be getting action while using a condom, while others find the insensitivity/discomfort/pain to be intolerable.  That's not the point.</p><p>The point is that condoms *are* uncomfortable, reduce stimulation, and are often painful for the larger gents out there.  There are not reliable size measurements and selections for condoms, which means that guys who are well endowed end up being shrink-wrapped like a damn hoagie.  The end 'ring' of the condom is even tighter and less elastic than the rest of the device, which means that you get a rather painful crushing feeling where that ring comes to rest, which can (and does) result in a *bruise*.  So when you factor in the fact that even when it isn't painful, it feels like you're not so much having sex as rubbing up against a deflated balloon, it's easy to see why condoms don't get used anywhere near as often as they should.</p><p>Condoms aren't good enough.  A better way must be found.</p><p>(have been with my woman for almost a decade - condoms are a distant memory for me.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact of some men use condoms all the time , some not , is meaningless .
It is irrelevant .
Condoms are unpleasant and often painful .
Some men will do the right thing and just be happy enough to be getting action while using a condom , while others find the insensitivity/discomfort/pain to be intolerable .
That 's not the point.The point is that condoms * are * uncomfortable , reduce stimulation , and are often painful for the larger gents out there .
There are not reliable size measurements and selections for condoms , which means that guys who are well endowed end up being shrink-wrapped like a damn hoagie .
The end 'ring ' of the condom is even tighter and less elastic than the rest of the device , which means that you get a rather painful crushing feeling where that ring comes to rest , which can ( and does ) result in a * bruise * .
So when you factor in the fact that even when it is n't painful , it feels like you 're not so much having sex as rubbing up against a deflated balloon , it 's easy to see why condoms do n't get used anywhere near as often as they should.Condoms are n't good enough .
A better way must be found .
( have been with my woman for almost a decade - condoms are a distant memory for me .
: D )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact of some men use condoms all the time, some not, is meaningless.
It is irrelevant.
Condoms are unpleasant and often painful.
Some men will do the right thing and just be happy enough to be getting action while using a condom, while others find the insensitivity/discomfort/pain to be intolerable.
That's not the point.The point is that condoms *are* uncomfortable, reduce stimulation, and are often painful for the larger gents out there.
There are not reliable size measurements and selections for condoms, which means that guys who are well endowed end up being shrink-wrapped like a damn hoagie.
The end 'ring' of the condom is even tighter and less elastic than the rest of the device, which means that you get a rather painful crushing feeling where that ring comes to rest, which can (and does) result in a *bruise*.
So when you factor in the fact that even when it isn't painful, it feels like you're not so much having sex as rubbing up against a deflated balloon, it's easy to see why condoms don't get used anywhere near as often as they should.Condoms aren't good enough.
A better way must be found.
(have been with my woman for almost a decade - condoms are a distant memory for me.
:D )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433493</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1245684240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.fleshlight.com/" title="fleshlight.com">Fleshlight.</a> [fleshlight.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether .
Fleshlight. [ fleshlight.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.
Fleshlight. [fleshlight.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</id>
	<title>Vasectomy</title>
	<author>lobiusmoop</author>
	<datestamp>1245672360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll just point out that in a steady relationship it 's \ _the \ _ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431293</id>
	<title>More FOX then News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article is more FOX then news, as if focuses on the people complaining about it.  This is the network who's only endorsed form of sex-ed is abstinence "education."</p><p>You might be quibling on the pricetag, but if this could increase condom use it could have incredible healthcare benefits.  And you know what, ultra-right-wing pundits?, greater condom use = less abortions; pick your f-ing battles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is more FOX then news , as if focuses on the people complaining about it .
This is the network who 's only endorsed form of sex-ed is abstinence " education .
" You might be quibling on the pricetag , but if this could increase condom use it could have incredible healthcare benefits .
And you know what , ultra-right-wing pundits ? , greater condom use = less abortions ; pick your f-ing battles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is more FOX then news, as if focuses on the people complaining about it.
This is the network who's only endorsed form of sex-ed is abstinence "education.
"You might be quibling on the pricetag, but if this could increase condom use it could have incredible healthcare benefits.
And you know what, ultra-right-wing pundits?, greater condom use = less abortions; pick your f-ing battles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441935</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>Dark\_Gravity</author>
	<datestamp>1245783180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Letting them die costs nothing.</p></div><p>Burying a person is expensive too.</p></div><p>That's why we have cremation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting them die costs nothing.Burying a person is expensive too.That 's why we have cremation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting them die costs nothing.Burying a person is expensive too.That's why we have cremation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431447</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Morally wrong but so hilarious +1 you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Morally wrong but so hilarious + 1 you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Morally wrong but so hilarious +1 you</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431937</id>
	<title>Women don't like either</title>
	<author>siriuskase</author>
	<datestamp>1245676380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Feels like masturbating with a pink pearl (TM)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Feels like masturbating with a pink pearl ( TM )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feels like masturbating with a pink pearl (TM)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431513</id>
	<title>Cutting to comercials.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Men hate condoms because it's like cutting to comercials right before the end of a good movie. You're really into the story, you really want to find out who's the killer and then Bam! five minute break. Might as well go get a sandwich or something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Men hate condoms because it 's like cutting to comercials right before the end of a good movie .
You 're really into the story , you really want to find out who 's the killer and then Bam !
five minute break .
Might as well go get a sandwich or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Men hate condoms because it's like cutting to comercials right before the end of a good movie.
You're really into the story, you really want to find out who's the killer and then Bam!
five minute break.
Might as well go get a sandwich or something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431393</id>
	<title>Reminds me of my "ex" blow up doll</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1245674040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....every time I see the rubber it reminds me of her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....every time I see the rubber it reminds me of her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....every time I see the rubber it reminds me of her.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435721</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're partner is willing, you can make it a <b>part</b> of the moment. No loss.</p></div><p>That's all fine and good, but what should the rapists do?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're partner is willing , you can make it a part of the moment .
No loss.That 's all fine and good , but what should the rapists do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're partner is willing, you can make it a part of the moment.
No loss.That's all fine and good, but what should the rapists do?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442831</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1245786300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>polyurethane and other thin or high end condoms are not readily available for the larger man, heck some stores I can't even buy regular large ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>polyurethane and other thin or high end condoms are not readily available for the larger man , heck some stores I ca n't even buy regular large ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>polyurethane and other thin or high end condoms are not readily available for the larger man, heck some stores I can't even buy regular large ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437157</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245762180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!!</i><br>Maybe have sex more often?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away !
! Maybe have sex more often ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!
!Maybe have sex more often?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430799</id>
	<title>Are you serious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's because all men secretly want to pay child support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's because all men secretly want to pay child support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's because all men secretly want to pay child support.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435207</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; If you're partner is willing, you can make it a part of the moment. No loss.</p><p>Sometimes. Not all sex is the same. Sometimes you just want to tear each others clothes off and go.</p><p>&gt;&gt; Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place?</p><p>Putting it in your wallet is dangerous; it basically destroys the condom, guaranteeing it will fail. Don't do that. And what is a "cool place" supposed to mean in this context?</p><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;they're disgusting to take off,<br>&gt;&gt; Subjective.<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;they're awkward to dispose of.<br>&gt;&gt; Also subjective.</p><p>Really? You can't possibly mean this. After the fact, they are just disgusting. I don't think you'll get anyone to seriously agree otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; If you 're partner is willing , you can make it a part of the moment .
No loss.Sometimes .
Not all sex is the same .
Sometimes you just want to tear each others clothes off and go. &gt; &gt; Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place ? Putting it in your wallet is dangerous ; it basically destroys the condom , guaranteeing it will fail .
Do n't do that .
And what is a " cool place " supposed to mean in this context ? &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; they 're disgusting to take off , &gt; &gt; Subjective. &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; they 're awkward to dispose of. &gt; &gt; Also subjective.Really ?
You ca n't possibly mean this .
After the fact , they are just disgusting .
I do n't think you 'll get anyone to seriously agree otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; If you're partner is willing, you can make it a part of the moment.
No loss.Sometimes.
Not all sex is the same.
Sometimes you just want to tear each others clothes off and go.&gt;&gt; Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place?Putting it in your wallet is dangerous; it basically destroys the condom, guaranteeing it will fail.
Don't do that.
And what is a "cool place" supposed to mean in this context?&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;they're disgusting to take off,&gt;&gt; Subjective.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;they're awkward to dispose of.&gt;&gt; Also subjective.Really?
You can't possibly mean this.
After the fact, they are just disgusting.
I don't think you'll get anyone to seriously agree otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437143</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245762000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>My favorite kind, Trojan Large [condomusa.com], have been discontinued. The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight. </i></p><p>A condom can easily fit over your head - the one on top of your shoulders. They can be stretched like a balloon to loosen. The reason they discontinued those style of condoms is because they are simply not needed. Anyone who can not be fit by a standard condom simply suffers from small ego or a disproportionate sense of self. With condoms, one size truly does fit all. Those condoms were always about marketing to those that wanted bragging rights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite kind , Trojan Large [ condomusa.com ] , have been discontinued .
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight .
A condom can easily fit over your head - the one on top of your shoulders .
They can be stretched like a balloon to loosen .
The reason they discontinued those style of condoms is because they are simply not needed .
Anyone who can not be fit by a standard condom simply suffers from small ego or a disproportionate sense of self .
With condoms , one size truly does fit all .
Those condoms were always about marketing to those that wanted bragging rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite kind, Trojan Large [condomusa.com], have been discontinued.
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.
A condom can easily fit over your head - the one on top of your shoulders.
They can be stretched like a balloon to loosen.
The reason they discontinued those style of condoms is because they are simply not needed.
Anyone who can not be fit by a standard condom simply suffers from small ego or a disproportionate sense of self.
With condoms, one size truly does fit all.
Those condoms were always about marketing to those that wanted bragging rights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430805</id>
	<title>yeah first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i suffer from premature post!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i suffer from premature post ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i suffer from premature post!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28492897</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>soren202</author>
	<datestamp>1246094820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, there is very little needed to discover why men don't like condoms.</p><p>They rob feeling, they're ugly, greasy, and usually cost money. They're not always handy, they kill the moment, and they make the whole thing seem less intimate (for the romantic types who notice things like that) and so on and so forth. The reason why men don't use them as often as they should? Hormones,  availability, laziness, and alternate contraceptives.</p><p>As for why some men use them all the time, and others rarely to not at all, that can be explained by how much a man is concerned about his partner getting pregnant, as well as how well he plans ahead, and how much self control he has.</p><p>If you want to fix these problems, increase condom availability (via handing out condoms, or some other such method), find ways to make them thinner, more sensitive, and easier to use, and other such things.</p><p>The problem with the research is not it's intent so much as the fact that it's getting information that could be gleaned from an Internet survey, and that it's money that could be put to better use, rather than finding out something that's common knowledge to anyone whose used a condom and had sex a few times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , there is very little needed to discover why men do n't like condoms.They rob feeling , they 're ugly , greasy , and usually cost money .
They 're not always handy , they kill the moment , and they make the whole thing seem less intimate ( for the romantic types who notice things like that ) and so on and so forth .
The reason why men do n't use them as often as they should ?
Hormones , availability , laziness , and alternate contraceptives.As for why some men use them all the time , and others rarely to not at all , that can be explained by how much a man is concerned about his partner getting pregnant , as well as how well he plans ahead , and how much self control he has.If you want to fix these problems , increase condom availability ( via handing out condoms , or some other such method ) , find ways to make them thinner , more sensitive , and easier to use , and other such things.The problem with the research is not it 's intent so much as the fact that it 's getting information that could be gleaned from an Internet survey , and that it 's money that could be put to better use , rather than finding out something that 's common knowledge to anyone whose used a condom and had sex a few times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, there is very little needed to discover why men don't like condoms.They rob feeling, they're ugly, greasy, and usually cost money.
They're not always handy, they kill the moment, and they make the whole thing seem less intimate (for the romantic types who notice things like that) and so on and so forth.
The reason why men don't use them as often as they should?
Hormones,  availability, laziness, and alternate contraceptives.As for why some men use them all the time, and others rarely to not at all, that can be explained by how much a man is concerned about his partner getting pregnant, as well as how well he plans ahead, and how much self control he has.If you want to fix these problems, increase condom availability (via handing out condoms, or some other such method), find ways to make them thinner, more sensitive, and easier to use, and other such things.The problem with the research is not it's intent so much as the fact that it's getting information that could be gleaned from an Internet survey, and that it's money that could be put to better use, rather than finding out something that's common knowledge to anyone whose used a condom and had sex a few times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>Tibor the Hun</author>
	<datestamp>1245681840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PULL OUT!?<br>are you retarded or did you go to a private school?</p><p>Do they not teach you kids that you can squeeze out juices prior to finishing, for the purpose of lubrication?<br>Good grief. Well, good for you and your girlfriend.</p><p>I got my wife pregnant while using spermicide, so that just goes to show that even with protection you can end up with what the mother nature intended for you.<br>(And also that my little spermies are unstoppable!!!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PULL OUT !
? are you retarded or did you go to a private school ? Do they not teach you kids that you can squeeze out juices prior to finishing , for the purpose of lubrication ? Good grief .
Well , good for you and your girlfriend.I got my wife pregnant while using spermicide , so that just goes to show that even with protection you can end up with what the mother nature intended for you .
( And also that my little spermies are unstoppable ! ! !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PULL OUT!
?are you retarded or did you go to a private school?Do they not teach you kids that you can squeeze out juices prior to finishing, for the purpose of lubrication?Good grief.
Well, good for you and your girlfriend.I got my wife pregnant while using spermicide, so that just goes to show that even with protection you can end up with what the mother nature intended for you.
(And also that my little spermies are unstoppable!!!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450705</id>
	<title>Yes I can.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1245843720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it shows respect and caring for your partner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it shows respect and caring for your partner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it shows respect and caring for your partner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245682260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then? If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.</p><p>I find this kind of argument pretty much hilarious and so it would be if there wasn't people who would take it seriously and damage in a non-repairable way the penises of their sons. This kind of choice is one you just cannot revert and you are simply depriving THEIR choice to have their WHOLE body just as "god" or nature made it imposing your choices to them for their whole life.</p><p>I think that if my parents did something like that to me i would simply take them to court, but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missing just like a blind man can't know what sight is and this is the only reason why there are not so many sons who take their parents in front of their responsibilities for useless choices that cannot be reverted for fear of "god", "hiv", "the toothfairy" and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you chop off your whole penis then ?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV , following your reasoning , it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.I find this kind of argument pretty much hilarious and so it would be if there was n't people who would take it seriously and damage in a non-repairable way the penises of their sons .
This kind of choice is one you just can not revert and you are simply depriving THEIR choice to have their WHOLE body just as " god " or nature made it imposing your choices to them for their whole life.I think that if my parents did something like that to me i would simply take them to court , but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missing just like a blind man ca n't know what sight is and this is the only reason why there are not so many sons who take their parents in front of their responsibilities for useless choices that can not be reverted for fear of " god " , " hiv " , " the toothfairy " and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.I find this kind of argument pretty much hilarious and so it would be if there wasn't people who would take it seriously and damage in a non-repairable way the penises of their sons.
This kind of choice is one you just cannot revert and you are simply depriving THEIR choice to have their WHOLE body just as "god" or nature made it imposing your choices to them for their whole life.I think that if my parents did something like that to me i would simply take them to court, but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missing just like a blind man can't know what sight is and this is the only reason why there are not so many sons who take their parents in front of their responsibilities for useless choices that cannot be reverted for fear of "god", "hiv", "the toothfairy" and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436525</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245754260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina."</p></div><p>I thought my penis was doing that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina .
" I thought my penis was doing that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina.
"I thought my penis was doing that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432347</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea that it affects sex is long disproven too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea that it affects sex is long disproven too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea that it affects sex is long disproven too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433299</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1245682920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether. </i>  <br> <br>

they did, it's called the FleshLight(tm)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether .
they did , it 's called the FleshLight ( tm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.
they did, it's called the FleshLight(tm)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28461977</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245856920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem:  HIV transmission when having sex with someone with an STD.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Solution:  Cut off a chunk of flesh and statistically reduce the risk of transmission when having sex with someone with HIV.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Is it just me, or is this maybe the wrong answer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem : HIV transmission when having sex with someone with an STD .
  Solution : Cut off a chunk of flesh and statistically reduce the risk of transmission when having sex with someone with HIV .
  Is it just me , or is this maybe the wrong answer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem:  HIV transmission when having sex with someone with an STD.
  Solution:  Cut off a chunk of flesh and statistically reduce the risk of transmission when having sex with someone with HIV.
  Is it just me, or is this maybe the wrong answer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438701</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245771300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, there's a lot of hate here on slashdot about condoms.</p><p>Here's my thoughts:</p><p>1.  Yes, they reduce sensitivity.  If you regularly DON'T use one, then switch to using one, you'll be disappointed.  But I've found the loss of sensitivity can actually be a good thing.  Intercourse can last longer, you gain a lot more control, and the "plateau" part of sex lasts a lot longer.  I've found that the overall experience can be just as pleasurable, if not more, because you can extend the pleasure.  And my wife is a whole lot happier when it lasts longer.</p><p>2.  Let's discuss alternatives.  Rhythm method?  Unreliable.  Vasectomy?  Permanent (which can be a good thing, but for a lot of us, it isn't).  Most people I know, their wives are on chemical birth control (the pill or something like it).  And then they wonder why their wives aren't interested in sex very often -- it's because those chemicals lower sex drive.  When we switched from the pill to condoms, my wife's interest in sex skyrocketed.  Sure, that's an anecdote, but I've heard many other similar reports.</p><p>3.  Being a hassle, reducing the mood -- yeah, that's an issue.  You learn to work around it.  And the cleanup mess is actually significantly less mess overall than without.  It's just messier for the guy instead of the girl.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , there 's a lot of hate here on slashdot about condoms.Here 's my thoughts : 1 .
Yes , they reduce sensitivity .
If you regularly DO N'T use one , then switch to using one , you 'll be disappointed .
But I 've found the loss of sensitivity can actually be a good thing .
Intercourse can last longer , you gain a lot more control , and the " plateau " part of sex lasts a lot longer .
I 've found that the overall experience can be just as pleasurable , if not more , because you can extend the pleasure .
And my wife is a whole lot happier when it lasts longer.2 .
Let 's discuss alternatives .
Rhythm method ?
Unreliable. Vasectomy ?
Permanent ( which can be a good thing , but for a lot of us , it is n't ) .
Most people I know , their wives are on chemical birth control ( the pill or something like it ) .
And then they wonder why their wives are n't interested in sex very often -- it 's because those chemicals lower sex drive .
When we switched from the pill to condoms , my wife 's interest in sex skyrocketed .
Sure , that 's an anecdote , but I 've heard many other similar reports.3 .
Being a hassle , reducing the mood -- yeah , that 's an issue .
You learn to work around it .
And the cleanup mess is actually significantly less mess overall than without .
It 's just messier for the guy instead of the girl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, there's a lot of hate here on slashdot about condoms.Here's my thoughts:1.
Yes, they reduce sensitivity.
If you regularly DON'T use one, then switch to using one, you'll be disappointed.
But I've found the loss of sensitivity can actually be a good thing.
Intercourse can last longer, you gain a lot more control, and the "plateau" part of sex lasts a lot longer.
I've found that the overall experience can be just as pleasurable, if not more, because you can extend the pleasure.
And my wife is a whole lot happier when it lasts longer.2.
Let's discuss alternatives.
Rhythm method?
Unreliable.  Vasectomy?
Permanent (which can be a good thing, but for a lot of us, it isn't).
Most people I know, their wives are on chemical birth control (the pill or something like it).
And then they wonder why their wives aren't interested in sex very often -- it's because those chemicals lower sex drive.
When we switched from the pill to condoms, my wife's interest in sex skyrocketed.
Sure, that's an anecdote, but I've heard many other similar reports.3.
Being a hassle, reducing the mood -- yeah, that's an issue.
You learn to work around it.
And the cleanup mess is actually significantly less mess overall than without.
It's just messier for the guy instead of the girl.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433215</id>
	<title>Re:it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245682500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I beg to differ.  I actually find it kind of arousing to put it on.</p><p>Also, the reduced sensitivity means I can go on... and on... and on...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I beg to differ .
I actually find it kind of arousing to put it on.Also , the reduced sensitivity means I can go on... and on... and on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I beg to differ.
I actually find it kind of arousing to put it on.Also, the reduced sensitivity means I can go on... and on... and on...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435687</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that just plain silly? Hey, girl, I'm circumcised, so we'll have to have sex 5 times before I get HIV instead of 4 times!

Using a condom and NOT being circumcised seems a LOT safer to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that just plain silly ?
Hey , girl , I 'm circumcised , so we 'll have to have sex 5 times before I get HIV instead of 4 times !
Using a condom and NOT being circumcised seems a LOT safer to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that just plain silly?
Hey, girl, I'm circumcised, so we'll have to have sex 5 times before I get HIV instead of 4 times!
Using a condom and NOT being circumcised seems a LOT safer to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437513</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245765060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your story makes me glad I've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine. Yep. Very glad.</p></div><p>Good luck with that.   The moment she changes her mind and wants children you'll get to deal with the consequences - regardless of what was said beforehand (promises of not wanting children yet, that she believes abortion is okay, etc.).  I speak from experience, unfortunately.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your story makes me glad I 've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine .
Yep. Very glad.Good luck with that .
The moment she changes her mind and wants children you 'll get to deal with the consequences - regardless of what was said beforehand ( promises of not wanting children yet , that she believes abortion is okay , etc. ) .
I speak from experience , unfortunately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your story makes me glad I've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine.
Yep. Very glad.Good luck with that.
The moment she changes her mind and wants children you'll get to deal with the consequences - regardless of what was said beforehand (promises of not wanting children yet, that she believes abortion is okay, etc.).
I speak from experience, unfortunately.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433885</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution.</title>
	<author>OverZealous.com</author>
	<datestamp>1245686580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.  Condoms are made from latex.</p><p>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.</p></div><p>So, just Dip It 'N' Stick It?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex .
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.So , just Dip It 'N ' Stick It ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.So, just Dip It 'N' Stick It?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434601</id>
	<title>How to use?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245690900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am uncircumcised and have never been able to successfully use a condom.</p><p>If I put the condom on while the skin is rolled up, the skin remains rolled up and I feel *absolutely* nothing.<br>If I roll it down and then put the condom on, it feels good for about 10 seconds before it starts to feel like I am making love to sandpaper and just gets worse and worse.</p><p>I have tried different condoms, latex, non-latex, all with the same results.</p><p>Anyone else with similar experiences? Any ideas?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am uncircumcised and have never been able to successfully use a condom.If I put the condom on while the skin is rolled up , the skin remains rolled up and I feel * absolutely * nothing.If I roll it down and then put the condom on , it feels good for about 10 seconds before it starts to feel like I am making love to sandpaper and just gets worse and worse.I have tried different condoms , latex , non-latex , all with the same results.Anyone else with similar experiences ?
Any ideas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am uncircumcised and have never been able to successfully use a condom.If I put the condom on while the skin is rolled up, the skin remains rolled up and I feel *absolutely* nothing.If I roll it down and then put the condom on, it feels good for about 10 seconds before it starts to feel like I am making love to sandpaper and just gets worse and worse.I have tried different condoms, latex, non-latex, all with the same results.Anyone else with similar experiences?
Any ideas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432943</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>an unsound mind</author>
	<datestamp>1245681120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CHOOSE to get a disease?</p><p>Jesus Christ.</p><p>Also, I call bullshit on your numbers. You pulled them out of your ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CHOOSE to get a disease ? Jesus Christ.Also , I call bullshit on your numbers .
You pulled them out of your ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CHOOSE to get a disease?Jesus Christ.Also, I call bullshit on your numbers.
You pulled them out of your ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435447</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1245698820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.</p></div><p>Just as it was obvious to anyone before, say, 1500 AD that light travels at infinite speed? Or to anyone before around 1880 AD that time is a constant? Or, to be blunt, to anyone in medieval Europe AD 1200 that God exists, the earth is flat and witches are evil?</p><p>One of the jobs of science is to question the obvious, and replace "obvious" with "scientifically verified".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason is obvious to anybody that 's ever used one.Just as it was obvious to anyone before , say , 1500 AD that light travels at infinite speed ?
Or to anyone before around 1880 AD that time is a constant ?
Or , to be blunt , to anyone in medieval Europe AD 1200 that God exists , the earth is flat and witches are evil ? One of the jobs of science is to question the obvious , and replace " obvious " with " scientifically verified " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.Just as it was obvious to anyone before, say, 1500 AD that light travels at infinite speed?
Or to anyone before around 1880 AD that time is a constant?
Or, to be blunt, to anyone in medieval Europe AD 1200 that God exists, the earth is flat and witches are evil?One of the jobs of science is to question the obvious, and replace "obvious" with "scientifically verified".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433419</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245683880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>double-blind</p></div><p>I do not think that word means what you think it means.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>double-blindI do not think that word means what you think it means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>double-blindI do not think that word means what you think it means.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436389</id>
	<title>Longer is better</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1245752700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't see the problem here. Decreasing sensitivity means a longer time to orgasm, and thus increased pleasure duration for both partners.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't see the problem here .
Decreasing sensitivity means a longer time to orgasm , and thus increased pleasure duration for both partners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't see the problem here.
Decreasing sensitivity means a longer time to orgasm, and thus increased pleasure duration for both partners.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433069</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1245681780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, and they ought to put the "pleasure spikes" on the INSIDE, too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and they ought to put the " pleasure spikes " on the INSIDE , too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and they ought to put the "pleasure spikes" on the INSIDE, too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431047</id>
	<title>Easy answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they rip off half of my pubes during the money shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they rip off half of my pubes during the money shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they rip off half of my pubes during the money shot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433315</id>
	<title>nonoxynol-9 is BAD!</title>
	<author>Cedric Tsui</author>
	<datestamp>1245683040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nonoxynol-9 is BAD!<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...recent findings indicate that it may actually increase a person's risk of contracting STDs, especially if used frequently. This is because the chemical causes tiny abrasions inside the sensitive vaginal and anal walls. These abrasions may make transmission more likely especially if condoms are not used.</p></div><p> from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonoxynol-9" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>nonoxynol-9 is BAD !
...recent findings indicate that it may actually increase a person 's risk of contracting STDs , especially if used frequently .
This is because the chemical causes tiny abrasions inside the sensitive vaginal and anal walls .
These abrasions may make transmission more likely especially if condoms are not used .
from Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nonoxynol-9 is BAD!
...recent findings indicate that it may actually increase a person's risk of contracting STDs, especially if used frequently.
This is because the chemical causes tiny abrasions inside the sensitive vaginal and anal walls.
These abrasions may make transmission more likely especially if condoms are not used.
from Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431125</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1245673200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It may be reliable but there are other side effects associated with them, and some are non-reversible even if you are able to reverse the physical procedure. Personally I would rather have something that is both free of side effects and reversible. This may be unattainable but it doesn't hurt to have goals. Sterilization cannot be counted on to be reversible and there are some side effects associated with such an operation that are less than desirable. For example your body will eventually create sperm antibodies that will search and destroy the sperm that get stuck in your system. This greatly reduces the reversibility of the procedure by itself. Also sperm buildup can create pressure which is uncomfortable. Ideally one would want the option that lets sperm move freely, while at the same time making sure that they are ineffective. Something like RISUG, actually.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It may be reliable but there are other side effects associated with them , and some are non-reversible even if you are able to reverse the physical procedure .
Personally I would rather have something that is both free of side effects and reversible .
This may be unattainable but it does n't hurt to have goals .
Sterilization can not be counted on to be reversible and there are some side effects associated with such an operation that are less than desirable .
For example your body will eventually create sperm antibodies that will search and destroy the sperm that get stuck in your system .
This greatly reduces the reversibility of the procedure by itself .
Also sperm buildup can create pressure which is uncomfortable .
Ideally one would want the option that lets sperm move freely , while at the same time making sure that they are ineffective .
Something like RISUG , actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may be reliable but there are other side effects associated with them, and some are non-reversible even if you are able to reverse the physical procedure.
Personally I would rather have something that is both free of side effects and reversible.
This may be unattainable but it doesn't hurt to have goals.
Sterilization cannot be counted on to be reversible and there are some side effects associated with such an operation that are less than desirable.
For example your body will eventually create sperm antibodies that will search and destroy the sperm that get stuck in your system.
This greatly reduces the reversibility of the procedure by itself.
Also sperm buildup can create pressure which is uncomfortable.
Ideally one would want the option that lets sperm move freely, while at the same time making sure that they are ineffective.
Something like RISUG, actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433439</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245683940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, medicine, for protecting very low risk previously and now married me from AIDS!  Wee!!  I don't have part of my penis!!  And I can't get it back!!  Weeee!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , medicine , for protecting very low risk previously and now married me from AIDS !
Wee ! ! I do n't have part of my penis ! !
And I ca n't get it back ! !
Weeee ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, medicine, for protecting very low risk previously and now married me from AIDS!
Wee!!  I don't have part of my penis!!
And I can't get it back!!
Weeee!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28451007</id>
	<title>It works</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245848520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>8 years of pulling out w/ 0 pregnancies. And we're both perfectly fertile. Just got to have a little self-control...</htmltext>
<tokenext>8 years of pulling out w/ 0 pregnancies .
And we 're both perfectly fertile .
Just got to have a little self-control.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8 years of pulling out w/ 0 pregnancies.
And we're both perfectly fertile.
Just got to have a little self-control...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435703</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mostly it's about sensitivity, but one thing that seldom gets talked about is size. Condom advocates say they are one size fits all but it's absolutely not true. I have 'small' friends who hate them because they lose them halfway through. I have the opposite problem: it's plain impossible to unroll the basic thick kind and I feel very constricted by the high-end stuff. I once tried real large (not the kind that only has 'large' written in big on the packet) condoms and they were much more comfortable. On the internet you can find companies that sell any width/length combination, but my wife and I prefer anal sex as a birth control method...   C;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mostly it 's about sensitivity , but one thing that seldom gets talked about is size .
Condom advocates say they are one size fits all but it 's absolutely not true .
I have 'small ' friends who hate them because they lose them halfway through .
I have the opposite problem : it 's plain impossible to unroll the basic thick kind and I feel very constricted by the high-end stuff .
I once tried real large ( not the kind that only has 'large ' written in big on the packet ) condoms and they were much more comfortable .
On the internet you can find companies that sell any width/length combination , but my wife and I prefer anal sex as a birth control method... C ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mostly it's about sensitivity, but one thing that seldom gets talked about is size.
Condom advocates say they are one size fits all but it's absolutely not true.
I have 'small' friends who hate them because they lose them halfway through.
I have the opposite problem: it's plain impossible to unroll the basic thick kind and I feel very constricted by the high-end stuff.
I once tried real large (not the kind that only has 'large' written in big on the packet) condoms and they were much more comfortable.
On the internet you can find companies that sell any width/length combination, but my wife and I prefer anal sex as a birth control method...   C;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>No</i> man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about. <br> <br>

There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9. Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh, causing itching or burning. Nevertheless, the liquid condom would be the best solution because, let's face it, condoms do not prevent bodily juices from getting into uncovered parts.<br> <br>

Finally, condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes. My favorite kind, <a href="http://www.condomusa.com/8b15-condom.asp" title="condomusa.com" rel="nofollow">Trojan Large</a> [condomusa.com], have been discontinued. The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight. <br> <br>

My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and <a href="http://www.jimmiehatz.com/homeFrame.html" title="jimmiehatz.com" rel="nofollow">jimmiehatz</a> [jimmiehatz.com], which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No man would rather wear a condom if people did n't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about .
There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms , which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9 .
Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh , causing itching or burning .
Nevertheless , the liquid condom would be the best solution because , let 's face it , condoms do not prevent bodily juices from getting into uncovered parts .
Finally , condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes .
My favorite kind , Trojan Large [ condomusa.com ] , have been discontinued .
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight .
My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and jimmiehatz [ jimmiehatz.com ] , which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.
There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9.
Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh, causing itching or burning.
Nevertheless, the liquid condom would be the best solution because, let's face it, condoms do not prevent bodily juices from getting into uncovered parts.
Finally, condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes.
My favorite kind, Trojan Large [condomusa.com], have been discontinued.
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.
My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and jimmiehatz [jimmiehatz.com], which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433079</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Thaelon</author>
	<datestamp>1245681780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm highly skeptical considering circumcision has been around longer than we've known that HIV existed.</p><p>Sounds to me like a justification, not a proof.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm highly skeptical considering circumcision has been around longer than we 've known that HIV existed.Sounds to me like a justification , not a proof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm highly skeptical considering circumcision has been around longer than we've known that HIV existed.Sounds to me like a justification, not a proof.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435063</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>ZorbaTHut</author>
	<datestamp>1245695040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure it does. Even ignoring the nontrivial funeral costs, there's opportunity costs versus what they would have contributed to society otherwise.</p><p>And, hell, if he convinces one person to wear a condom so they, themselves, don't get AIDS, he's already paid for his own treatment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure it does .
Even ignoring the nontrivial funeral costs , there 's opportunity costs versus what they would have contributed to society otherwise.And , hell , if he convinces one person to wear a condom so they , themselves , do n't get AIDS , he 's already paid for his own treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure it does.
Even ignoring the nontrivial funeral costs, there's opportunity costs versus what they would have contributed to society otherwise.And, hell, if he convinces one person to wear a condom so they, themselves, don't get AIDS, he's already paid for his own treatment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435521</id>
	<title>But why don't women like condoms?</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1245699420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strangely, in my experience it is women who don't like condoms. I like the impression of safety they give me and don't mind the slightly different sensation during intercourse. It's a price I gladly pay.</p><p>But many women I know much prefer to go without condoms. Some will actually use condoms for safety, but others really insist on not using a condom. I've always found that odd. They have various reasons: prefer the feeling without condom, feel more connected with their partner without a condom, allergic to rubber or the spermicides or the lubricant, religious objection and, a distant last, actually want to get pregnant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strangely , in my experience it is women who do n't like condoms .
I like the impression of safety they give me and do n't mind the slightly different sensation during intercourse .
It 's a price I gladly pay.But many women I know much prefer to go without condoms .
Some will actually use condoms for safety , but others really insist on not using a condom .
I 've always found that odd .
They have various reasons : prefer the feeling without condom , feel more connected with their partner without a condom , allergic to rubber or the spermicides or the lubricant , religious objection and , a distant last , actually want to get pregnant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strangely, in my experience it is women who don't like condoms.
I like the impression of safety they give me and don't mind the slightly different sensation during intercourse.
It's a price I gladly pay.But many women I know much prefer to go without condoms.
Some will actually use condoms for safety, but others really insist on not using a condom.
I've always found that odd.
They have various reasons: prefer the feeling without condom, feel more connected with their partner without a condom, allergic to rubber or the spermicides or the lubricant, religious objection and, a distant last, actually want to get pregnant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433325</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1245683100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Wasted tax money", what shortsightedness! I agree with what your saying the ability to promote desirable safe sex will pay for itself easily. As left winged as this sounds, abortion is also a great choice for a couple to have. If people are not ready to have children they will cost the tax payer massive amounts of money to support the ill planned child. These choices give the couple a chance to be productive members of society so that they can have children when they can support them. In the end likely saving huge amounts of tax money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Wasted tax money " , what shortsightedness !
I agree with what your saying the ability to promote desirable safe sex will pay for itself easily .
As left winged as this sounds , abortion is also a great choice for a couple to have .
If people are not ready to have children they will cost the tax payer massive amounts of money to support the ill planned child .
These choices give the couple a chance to be productive members of society so that they can have children when they can support them .
In the end likely saving huge amounts of tax money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Wasted tax money", what shortsightedness!
I agree with what your saying the ability to promote desirable safe sex will pay for itself easily.
As left winged as this sounds, abortion is also a great choice for a couple to have.
If people are not ready to have children they will cost the tax payer massive amounts of money to support the ill planned child.
These choices give the couple a chance to be productive members of society so that they can have children when they can support them.
In the end likely saving huge amounts of tax money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437305</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>mdarksbane</author>
	<datestamp>1245763320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, have you ever actually *had* sex with a condom?</p><p>There is no way I would ever, ever prefer that. The only reason I'm stuck with it is that birth control turns my wife into a crazy person.</p><p>They make the room smell like latex instead of sex. They significantly reduce direct feeling - sure, you still get the nice feeling of being squeezed, but there's no specific tactile feedback of touching someone's skin. They make her *taste* like latex if you want to continue the encounter after you've orgasmed. They mean instead of looking longingly into her eyes and entering her, you have to say "ok, excuse me," and go rummage in a drawer, open a wrapper, and apply it to yourself. *or* you have to put one next to everywhere you might ever want to ever sex ahead of time, so it's readily available.</p><p>Oh, and just to add insult to injury, they're sized, and if you aren't the "standard" size, you may have to go to five different stores to find the one remaining pack of "Trojan Magnum XL" in stock (Yes, this has actually happened to me. You try wandering around at 6 am on an Ohio winter morning because you're out of condoms but your girlfriend is horny). I've heard of people studying abroad who had to have their mothers MAIL THEM CONDOMS because they couldn't find any of the local variety that would fit.</p><p>Is there anything I'm missing? I can't think of a single possible reason that using a condom is physically preferable to unprotected sex. I mean, sex is still good with on, and it's better than no sex, and it's definitely better than dying or paying child support, but I just can't imagine anyone *wanting* to wear a condom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , have you ever actually * had * sex with a condom ? There is no way I would ever , ever prefer that .
The only reason I 'm stuck with it is that birth control turns my wife into a crazy person.They make the room smell like latex instead of sex .
They significantly reduce direct feeling - sure , you still get the nice feeling of being squeezed , but there 's no specific tactile feedback of touching someone 's skin .
They make her * taste * like latex if you want to continue the encounter after you 've orgasmed .
They mean instead of looking longingly into her eyes and entering her , you have to say " ok , excuse me , " and go rummage in a drawer , open a wrapper , and apply it to yourself .
* or * you have to put one next to everywhere you might ever want to ever sex ahead of time , so it 's readily available.Oh , and just to add insult to injury , they 're sized , and if you are n't the " standard " size , you may have to go to five different stores to find the one remaining pack of " Trojan Magnum XL " in stock ( Yes , this has actually happened to me .
You try wandering around at 6 am on an Ohio winter morning because you 're out of condoms but your girlfriend is horny ) .
I 've heard of people studying abroad who had to have their mothers MAIL THEM CONDOMS because they could n't find any of the local variety that would fit.Is there anything I 'm missing ?
I ca n't think of a single possible reason that using a condom is physically preferable to unprotected sex .
I mean , sex is still good with on , and it 's better than no sex , and it 's definitely better than dying or paying child support , but I just ca n't imagine anyone * wanting * to wear a condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, have you ever actually *had* sex with a condom?There is no way I would ever, ever prefer that.
The only reason I'm stuck with it is that birth control turns my wife into a crazy person.They make the room smell like latex instead of sex.
They significantly reduce direct feeling - sure, you still get the nice feeling of being squeezed, but there's no specific tactile feedback of touching someone's skin.
They make her *taste* like latex if you want to continue the encounter after you've orgasmed.
They mean instead of looking longingly into her eyes and entering her, you have to say "ok, excuse me," and go rummage in a drawer, open a wrapper, and apply it to yourself.
*or* you have to put one next to everywhere you might ever want to ever sex ahead of time, so it's readily available.Oh, and just to add insult to injury, they're sized, and if you aren't the "standard" size, you may have to go to five different stores to find the one remaining pack of "Trojan Magnum XL" in stock (Yes, this has actually happened to me.
You try wandering around at 6 am on an Ohio winter morning because you're out of condoms but your girlfriend is horny).
I've heard of people studying abroad who had to have their mothers MAIL THEM CONDOMS because they couldn't find any of the local variety that would fit.Is there anything I'm missing?
I can't think of a single possible reason that using a condom is physically preferable to unprotected sex.
I mean, sex is still good with on, and it's better than no sex, and it's definitely better than dying or paying child support, but I just can't imagine anyone *wanting* to wear a condom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767</id>
	<title>Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the men who don't like condoms are dicks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the men who do n't like condoms are dicks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the men who don't like condoms are dicks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431597</id>
	<title>Re:it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>jfengel</author>
	<datestamp>1245674700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now</p></div><p>Are you really, really bad at putting on a condom, or are you really, really good at filling out your taxes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right nowAre you really , really bad at putting on a condom , or are you really , really good at filling out your taxes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right nowAre you really, really bad at putting on a condom, or are you really, really good at filling out your taxes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442179</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1245784020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can taste with your dick?  Mine must be defective then, because I've definitely never tasted anything with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can taste with your dick ?
Mine must be defective then , because I 've definitely never tasted anything with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can taste with your dick?
Mine must be defective then, because I've definitely never tasted anything with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431603</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436167</id>
	<title>Latex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245750120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Latex sucks cause you have to compile every time to see the result.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Latex sucks cause you have to compile every time to see the result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Latex sucks cause you have to compile every time to see the result.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436565</id>
	<title>Why men don't like condoms?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245755040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the answer is pretty simple...</p><p>We have a biological urge to pro-create.  No offense, but I always get off on the idea that I could get a woman pregnant...  until i'm finished that is.  The heat of the moment carries me away and gives me a buzz...  I can't believe i'm alone in this department.</p><p>Btw, one other poster said you're better off shagging an average woman rather than a better looking woman?  I say that you're better off with someone who you're personally and sexually compatible with - regardless of how they look.  My ex was a bomb shell - but a nut job.  My wife is good looking, but not a bomb shell.  I preferred the physical side with my ex - but I just couldn't stand the high maintenance personality and constant mood swings.</p><p>AC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the answer is pretty simple...We have a biological urge to pro-create .
No offense , but I always get off on the idea that I could get a woman pregnant... until i 'm finished that is .
The heat of the moment carries me away and gives me a buzz... I ca n't believe i 'm alone in this department.Btw , one other poster said you 're better off shagging an average woman rather than a better looking woman ?
I say that you 're better off with someone who you 're personally and sexually compatible with - regardless of how they look .
My ex was a bomb shell - but a nut job .
My wife is good looking , but not a bomb shell .
I preferred the physical side with my ex - but I just could n't stand the high maintenance personality and constant mood swings.AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the answer is pretty simple...We have a biological urge to pro-create.
No offense, but I always get off on the idea that I could get a woman pregnant...  until i'm finished that is.
The heat of the moment carries me away and gives me a buzz...  I can't believe i'm alone in this department.Btw, one other poster said you're better off shagging an average woman rather than a better looking woman?
I say that you're better off with someone who you're personally and sexually compatible with - regardless of how they look.
My ex was a bomb shell - but a nut job.
My wife is good looking, but not a bomb shell.
I preferred the physical side with my ex - but I just couldn't stand the high maintenance personality and constant mood swings.AC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438039</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1245768060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Subjective."<br>"Also subjective."<br>"Exactly. It's all subjective."</p><p>I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest that the moment some chick is moaning about how she wants you to nail her NOW, that if there is EVER a time that 'objectivity' should be tossed out the flippin' window, that would be the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Subjective .
" " Also subjective. " " Exactly .
It 's all subjective .
" I 'm going to go out on a limb here , and suggest that the moment some chick is moaning about how she wants you to nail her NOW , that if there is EVER a time that 'objectivity ' should be tossed out the flippin ' window , that would be the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Subjective.
""Also subjective.""Exactly.
It's all subjective.
"I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest that the moment some chick is moaning about how she wants you to nail her NOW, that if there is EVER a time that 'objectivity' should be tossed out the flippin' window, that would be the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Beefpatrol</author>
	<datestamp>1245681540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a consumer reports article about condoms a few years back -- it reported that the ones least likely to break were the LifeStyles Extra Thin or Ultra Thin or whatever they are called.  I don't remember the data from the study, so the conclusion might not have been statistically significant; It seems implausible that the thinner condoms were less likely to break than the regular condoms, but maybe they use a different rubber formulation in the thin ones or something.</p><p>In my experience, LifeStyles condoms, (even the regular ones,) seem to be a better fit than the "magnum" or "large" Trojan products for a heat seeking moisture missile of somewhat larger than average diameter.  I think this is because they are more elastic than the Trojans.  I once had one of the Kimono ones break, but I've never had a LifeStyles break, and I've used a lot more of the LifeStyles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a consumer reports article about condoms a few years back -- it reported that the ones least likely to break were the LifeStyles Extra Thin or Ultra Thin or whatever they are called .
I do n't remember the data from the study , so the conclusion might not have been statistically significant ; It seems implausible that the thinner condoms were less likely to break than the regular condoms , but maybe they use a different rubber formulation in the thin ones or something.In my experience , LifeStyles condoms , ( even the regular ones , ) seem to be a better fit than the " magnum " or " large " Trojan products for a heat seeking moisture missile of somewhat larger than average diameter .
I think this is because they are more elastic than the Trojans .
I once had one of the Kimono ones break , but I 've never had a LifeStyles break , and I 've used a lot more of the LifeStyles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a consumer reports article about condoms a few years back -- it reported that the ones least likely to break were the LifeStyles Extra Thin or Ultra Thin or whatever they are called.
I don't remember the data from the study, so the conclusion might not have been statistically significant; It seems implausible that the thinner condoms were less likely to break than the regular condoms, but maybe they use a different rubber formulation in the thin ones or something.In my experience, LifeStyles condoms, (even the regular ones,) seem to be a better fit than the "magnum" or "large" Trojan products for a heat seeking moisture missile of somewhat larger than average diameter.
I think this is because they are more elastic than the Trojans.
I once had one of the Kimono ones break, but I've never had a LifeStyles break, and I've used a lot more of the LifeStyles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434395</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.  Condoms are made from latex.</p><p>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.</p></div><p>Thats going to be painful to maintain...    watching paint dry and all that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex .
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.Thats going to be painful to maintain... watching paint dry and all that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.Thats going to be painful to maintain...    watching paint dry and all that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433077</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Kuciwalker</author>
	<datestamp>1245681780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.  If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.</p></div><p>

Even more of of a huge benefit: sex would be more fun.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , if the study is " how can we FIX what men do n't like about condoms " , then the study becomes very important , and might benefit society immensely .
If a condom could be constructed that did n't impede feeling at all , there would be huge benefits , a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies .
Even more of of a huge benefit : sex would be more fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.
If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.
Even more of of a huge benefit: sex would be more fun.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432453</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They smell bad, they distract from the spontenaity of the moment, they decrease sensitivity, they're never handy at the moment you want them, they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.</p></div><p>That's no way to talk about women.  Maybe that's your problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They smell bad , they distract from the spontenaity of the moment , they decrease sensitivity , they 're never handy at the moment you want them , they 're disgusting to take off , they 're awkward to dispose of.That 's no way to talk about women .
Maybe that 's your problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They smell bad, they distract from the spontenaity of the moment, they decrease sensitivity, they're never handy at the moment you want them, they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.That's no way to talk about women.
Maybe that's your problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431259</id>
	<title>Its the ladies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As soon as the lady friend looks at you as a serious boyfriend they want to get rid of the condom.  So to keep the rika-rika going the man says sure. Why the lady says that?  Get another $400,000.<br>But don't ask anyone on Slash/Virgin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As soon as the lady friend looks at you as a serious boyfriend they want to get rid of the condom .
So to keep the rika-rika going the man says sure .
Why the lady says that ?
Get another $ 400,000.But do n't ask anyone on Slash/Virgin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As soon as the lady friend looks at you as a serious boyfriend they want to get rid of the condom.
So to keep the rika-rika going the man says sure.
Why the lady says that?
Get another $400,000.But don't ask anyone on Slash/Virgin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</id>
	<title>What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's to study "why men don't like condoms", as it is being widely reported, then yes, the study is a waste of money.  The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.<br> <br>

However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.  If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.<br> <br>

Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's to study " why men do n't like condoms " , as it is being widely reported , then yes , the study is a waste of money .
The reason is obvious to anybody that 's ever used one .
However , if the study is " how can we FIX what men do n't like about condoms " , then the study becomes very important , and might benefit society immensely .
If a condom could be constructed that did n't impede feeling at all , there would be huge benefits , a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies .
Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's to study "why men don't like condoms", as it is being widely reported, then yes, the study is a waste of money.
The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.
However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.
If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.
Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435027</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Sun</author>
	<datestamp>1245694740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am what you would call "consistent condom user", in that I used it with every partner I've ever been with that haven't been committed to me in the three months before having sex, and then still use it until we were both tested for HIV.</p><p>And I <b>HATE</b> condoms. I can totally sympathize with the commenter above me saying it feels vaguely warm. I can totally sympathize with the garden hose analogy. While not strictly impossible to have good sex with a condom, it does make it hard work, and much less fun than it usually is (and what it should be). One of the many many many things I'm grateful for about my wife is that we can do away with this particular piece of polymer.</p><p>The distinction you made between people who do and do not use condoms exists, of course, but I attribute it to the distinction between people who care more or less about their health. If a study can find out how to make condoms less despiseable, and thus make the world a somewhat less disease riddled place, I say go for it.</p><p>Shachar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am what you would call " consistent condom user " , in that I used it with every partner I 've ever been with that have n't been committed to me in the three months before having sex , and then still use it until we were both tested for HIV.And I HATE condoms .
I can totally sympathize with the commenter above me saying it feels vaguely warm .
I can totally sympathize with the garden hose analogy .
While not strictly impossible to have good sex with a condom , it does make it hard work , and much less fun than it usually is ( and what it should be ) .
One of the many many many things I 'm grateful for about my wife is that we can do away with this particular piece of polymer.The distinction you made between people who do and do not use condoms exists , of course , but I attribute it to the distinction between people who care more or less about their health .
If a study can find out how to make condoms less despiseable , and thus make the world a somewhat less disease riddled place , I say go for it.Shachar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am what you would call "consistent condom user", in that I used it with every partner I've ever been with that haven't been committed to me in the three months before having sex, and then still use it until we were both tested for HIV.And I HATE condoms.
I can totally sympathize with the commenter above me saying it feels vaguely warm.
I can totally sympathize with the garden hose analogy.
While not strictly impossible to have good sex with a condom, it does make it hard work, and much less fun than it usually is (and what it should be).
One of the many many many things I'm grateful for about my wife is that we can do away with this particular piece of polymer.The distinction you made between people who do and do not use condoms exists, of course, but I attribute it to the distinction between people who care more or less about their health.
If a study can find out how to make condoms less despiseable, and thus make the world a somewhat less disease riddled place, I say go for it.Shachar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436757</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1245757260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.</p></div></blockquote><p>Clearly so, as that's the reason condoms exist in the first place.</p><blockquote><div><p>There should be more R&amp;D funding into...basically a spermicidal lube</p></div></blockquote><p>If you want to spread sperm-killing chemicals all over your one and only sperm-producing tool, go right ahead.  I'll stick with the rubber.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No man would rather wear a condom if people did n't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.Clearly so , as that 's the reason condoms exist in the first place.There should be more R&amp;D funding into...basically a spermicidal lubeIf you want to spread sperm-killing chemicals all over your one and only sperm-producing tool , go right ahead .
I 'll stick with the rubber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.Clearly so, as that's the reason condoms exist in the first place.There should be more R&amp;D funding into...basically a spermicidal lubeIf you want to spread sperm-killing chemicals all over your one and only sperm-producing tool, go right ahead.
I'll stick with the rubber.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433163</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>ucblockhead</author>
	<datestamp>1245682200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is the same as the reason some men are drunks, some drink in moderation, and some are tee-totalers.  It is the same reason that some men are 300 pound lard asses who eat twinkees all day while others eat healthy.  It is because people vary according to their ability to forgo pleasure to avoid long-term negative consequences.</p><p>Speaking as someone who has always used the appropriate birth-control, including, for a couple significant periods with condoms, those who think that the reduction in pleasure caused by them are in complete and utter denial.</p><p>There doesn't need to be "something else going on".  It is simple: Condoms reduce pleasure.  Some men are less able to forgo pleasure to avoid danger.  Engaging in psychobabble about how men are "overestimating the reduction in sensitivity" is a sure way to utterly fail to solve the problem.  It's like claiming that the candy and soda don't taste that much better when fighting teen obesity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is the same as the reason some men are drunks , some drink in moderation , and some are tee-totalers .
It is the same reason that some men are 300 pound lard asses who eat twinkees all day while others eat healthy .
It is because people vary according to their ability to forgo pleasure to avoid long-term negative consequences.Speaking as someone who has always used the appropriate birth-control , including , for a couple significant periods with condoms , those who think that the reduction in pleasure caused by them are in complete and utter denial.There does n't need to be " something else going on " .
It is simple : Condoms reduce pleasure .
Some men are less able to forgo pleasure to avoid danger .
Engaging in psychobabble about how men are " overestimating the reduction in sensitivity " is a sure way to utterly fail to solve the problem .
It 's like claiming that the candy and soda do n't taste that much better when fighting teen obesity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is the same as the reason some men are drunks, some drink in moderation, and some are tee-totalers.
It is the same reason that some men are 300 pound lard asses who eat twinkees all day while others eat healthy.
It is because people vary according to their ability to forgo pleasure to avoid long-term negative consequences.Speaking as someone who has always used the appropriate birth-control, including, for a couple significant periods with condoms, those who think that the reduction in pleasure caused by them are in complete and utter denial.There doesn't need to be "something else going on".
It is simple: Condoms reduce pleasure.
Some men are less able to forgo pleasure to avoid danger.
Engaging in psychobabble about how men are "overestimating the reduction in sensitivity" is a sure way to utterly fail to solve the problem.
It's like claiming that the candy and soda don't taste that much better when fighting teen obesity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</id>
	<title>Easy solution.</title>
	<author>B5\_geek</author>
	<datestamp>1245675600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.  Condoms are made from latex.</p><p>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex .
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I discovered that housepaint is made from latex.
Condoms are made from latex.Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437487</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245764820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about no GOV healthcare you dalt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about no GOV healthcare you dalt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about no GOV healthcare you dalt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</id>
	<title>I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They smell bad, they distract from the spontenaity of the moment, they decrease sensitivity, they're never handy at the moment you want them, they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.</p><p>Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They smell bad , they distract from the spontenaity of the moment , they decrease sensitivity , they 're never handy at the moment you want them , they 're disgusting to take off , they 're awkward to dispose of.Despite that they 're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support , or your penis turning green and falling off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They smell bad, they distract from the spontenaity of the moment, they decrease sensitivity, they're never handy at the moment you want them, they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437311</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1245763380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are devices which can produce stronger and more reliable orgasms (e.g. sybian for women), but that's missing an important point: sex isn't just about sensation, it's about making a connection with the other person.</p><p>Condoms reduce the intimacy of sex. Even ignoring the physical barrier, it's like saying you don't trust the other person not fail at taking the pill/knowing their cycle and are worried that they are diseased.</p><p>Of course, the post-sex cleanup is easier but that isn't the first thing on your mind when you have a raging boner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are devices which can produce stronger and more reliable orgasms ( e.g .
sybian for women ) , but that 's missing an important point : sex is n't just about sensation , it 's about making a connection with the other person.Condoms reduce the intimacy of sex .
Even ignoring the physical barrier , it 's like saying you do n't trust the other person not fail at taking the pill/knowing their cycle and are worried that they are diseased.Of course , the post-sex cleanup is easier but that is n't the first thing on your mind when you have a raging boner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are devices which can produce stronger and more reliable orgasms (e.g.
sybian for women), but that's missing an important point: sex isn't just about sensation, it's about making a connection with the other person.Condoms reduce the intimacy of sex.
Even ignoring the physical barrier, it's like saying you don't trust the other person not fail at taking the pill/knowing their cycle and are worried that they are diseased.Of course, the post-sex cleanup is easier but that isn't the first thing on your mind when you have a raging boner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433853</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1245686460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For what it's worth try Trojan Supra Microsheer Polyurethane.  They cost a bit more but I've found them to be a worthwhile investment.</p><p>My wife and I had some issues with Latex condoms.  They really did smell quite poor and they caused her to feel burning after.  Someone told us we should try lambskin and talk about smell....ewwww....I seriously had to stop once because the smell turned off my mood completely.  Since we moved to the Microsheer things have been much better.  Actually, they seem to be more sensitive than anything else so uhm, my performance uhm, dropped off a bit until I got used to the increased sensitivity.</p><p>Seriously, find a way that works for you.  Much better than the alternative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For what it 's worth try Trojan Supra Microsheer Polyurethane .
They cost a bit more but I 've found them to be a worthwhile investment.My wife and I had some issues with Latex condoms .
They really did smell quite poor and they caused her to feel burning after .
Someone told us we should try lambskin and talk about smell....ewwww....I seriously had to stop once because the smell turned off my mood completely .
Since we moved to the Microsheer things have been much better .
Actually , they seem to be more sensitive than anything else so uhm , my performance uhm , dropped off a bit until I got used to the increased sensitivity.Seriously , find a way that works for you .
Much better than the alternative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For what it's worth try Trojan Supra Microsheer Polyurethane.
They cost a bit more but I've found them to be a worthwhile investment.My wife and I had some issues with Latex condoms.
They really did smell quite poor and they caused her to feel burning after.
Someone told us we should try lambskin and talk about smell....ewwww....I seriously had to stop once because the smell turned off my mood completely.
Since we moved to the Microsheer things have been much better.
Actually, they seem to be more sensitive than anything else so uhm, my performance uhm, dropped off a bit until I got used to the increased sensitivity.Seriously, find a way that works for you.
Much better than the alternative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434151</id>
	<title>Trojans=Tight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have to agree on the Trojans. Way too damn tight, and nothing sucks quite as much as having your little friend being squeezed and chaffed. I've found that Durex tend to fit a little better in that regard though, and besides, who the heck decided to name a condom Trojan... you know, like the group who supposedly snuck their little soldiers secretly into the enemy fortress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have to agree on the Trojans .
Way too damn tight , and nothing sucks quite as much as having your little friend being squeezed and chaffed .
I 've found that Durex tend to fit a little better in that regard though , and besides , who the heck decided to name a condom Trojan... you know , like the group who supposedly snuck their little soldiers secretly into the enemy fortress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have to agree on the Trojans.
Way too damn tight, and nothing sucks quite as much as having your little friend being squeezed and chaffed.
I've found that Durex tend to fit a little better in that regard though, and besides, who the heck decided to name a condom Trojan... you know, like the group who supposedly snuck their little soldiers secretly into the enemy fortress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437211</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245762660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who regularly uses condoms, desensitization is not "a myth" or "overblown", it's reality.  It might only be for circumcised males, but it's definitely a reality at least for that (very large) group.  They could have given me the 400k and I could have told them that.  Turns out putting a rubber balloon on your penis often slightly cuts off the blood supply slightly and makes it more difficult for you penis to feel what's actually going on.  This just in: it's the same thing with gloves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who regularly uses condoms , desensitization is not " a myth " or " overblown " , it 's reality .
It might only be for circumcised males , but it 's definitely a reality at least for that ( very large ) group .
They could have given me the 400k and I could have told them that .
Turns out putting a rubber balloon on your penis often slightly cuts off the blood supply slightly and makes it more difficult for you penis to feel what 's actually going on .
This just in : it 's the same thing with gloves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who regularly uses condoms, desensitization is not "a myth" or "overblown", it's reality.
It might only be for circumcised males, but it's definitely a reality at least for that (very large) group.
They could have given me the 400k and I could have told them that.
Turns out putting a rubber balloon on your penis often slightly cuts off the blood supply slightly and makes it more difficult for you penis to feel what's actually going on.
This just in: it's the same thing with gloves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435037</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1245694800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Letting them die costs nothing.</p></div><p>Burying a person is expensive too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Letting them die costs nothing.Burying a person is expensive too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Letting them die costs nothing.Burying a person is expensive too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441037</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1245780120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, many doctors will refuse to perform a vasectomy if the couple doesn't already have kids.  Doubly so if it's a younger couple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , many doctors will refuse to perform a vasectomy if the couple does n't already have kids .
Doubly so if it 's a younger couple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, many doctors will refuse to perform a vasectomy if the couple doesn't already have kids.
Doubly so if it's a younger couple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436449</id>
	<title>Re:Another political cheap shot at public expense</title>
	<author>Sobrique</author>
	<datestamp>1245753360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh").</p></div></blockquote><p>
Actually I'd refute that one. If your objective is to blow your load as fast as possible, then sure. If your objective is to allow your partner to enjoy herself, then reduced sensitivity is actually a good thing. Indeed, there's even condoms sold with that notion in mind. <br>
I'd say the major drawback of a condom is that they're inconvenient - when you're putting it one before hand, and when you take it off after. But hey, it's a good reason we have a study, so we can actually get a scientific approach, rather than listening to anecdotes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is one very obvious reason why men do n't like to wear condoms ( " it does n't feel as good...duh " ) .
Actually I 'd refute that one .
If your objective is to blow your load as fast as possible , then sure .
If your objective is to allow your partner to enjoy herself , then reduced sensitivity is actually a good thing .
Indeed , there 's even condoms sold with that notion in mind .
I 'd say the major drawback of a condom is that they 're inconvenient - when you 're putting it one before hand , and when you take it off after .
But hey , it 's a good reason we have a study , so we can actually get a scientific approach , rather than listening to anecdotes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh").
Actually I'd refute that one.
If your objective is to blow your load as fast as possible, then sure.
If your objective is to allow your partner to enjoy herself, then reduced sensitivity is actually a good thing.
Indeed, there's even condoms sold with that notion in mind.
I'd say the major drawback of a condom is that they're inconvenient - when you're putting it one before hand, and when you take it off after.
But hey, it's a good reason we have a study, so we can actually get a scientific approach, rather than listening to anecdotes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435353</id>
	<title>Good, thin, reliable? What?</title>
	<author>Zalminen</author>
	<datestamp>1245698040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the good, thin and reliable</p></div><p>I'd say pick two. Hell, most of the time it's pick <b> <i>one</i> </b>!
<br> <br>
<b>I've yet to find a type of condom that I couldn't break just by having sex.</b> <br>
Yes, even the 'extra strong' types. It's one of the downsides of having a much thicker than average member. And 'thin' and 'reliable' tend to be mutually exclusive.<br> <br>
<b>I've yet to find a non-latex condom that's big enough.</b> <br>
Their added durability may allow for thinner condoms but they're of no use if I can't even put them on! (Damn euro standard size condoms) At least the normal condoms can be stretched a little if they're not big enough to just roll on....
<br>Plus the non-latex condoms tend to be a bit too costly for constant use anyway.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the good , thin and reliableI 'd say pick two .
Hell , most of the time it 's pick one !
I 've yet to find a type of condom that I could n't break just by having sex .
Yes , even the 'extra strong ' types .
It 's one of the downsides of having a much thicker than average member .
And 'thin ' and 'reliable ' tend to be mutually exclusive .
I 've yet to find a non-latex condom that 's big enough .
Their added durability may allow for thinner condoms but they 're of no use if I ca n't even put them on !
( Damn euro standard size condoms ) At least the normal condoms can be stretched a little if they 're not big enough to just roll on... . Plus the non-latex condoms tend to be a bit too costly for constant use anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the good, thin and reliableI'd say pick two.
Hell, most of the time it's pick  one !
I've yet to find a type of condom that I couldn't break just by having sex.
Yes, even the 'extra strong' types.
It's one of the downsides of having a much thicker than average member.
And 'thin' and 'reliable' tend to be mutually exclusive.
I've yet to find a non-latex condom that's big enough.
Their added durability may allow for thinner condoms but they're of no use if I can't even put them on!
(Damn euro standard size condoms) At least the normal condoms can be stretched a little if they're not big enough to just roll on....
Plus the non-latex condoms tend to be a bit too costly for constant use anyway.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431783</id>
	<title>anonymous coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245675600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being asked to wear a condom is like being offered a sumptuous feast prepared by your favorite chef and then being told you won't be able to taste it. Sure, you can eat the meal, feel somewhat sated afterward, but you've lost all the delicate and bold flavors, the textures and sensations. You've lost the joy of the experience, even if you aren't [as] hungry afterward.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being asked to wear a condom is like being offered a sumptuous feast prepared by your favorite chef and then being told you wo n't be able to taste it .
Sure , you can eat the meal , feel somewhat sated afterward , but you 've lost all the delicate and bold flavors , the textures and sensations .
You 've lost the joy of the experience , even if you are n't [ as ] hungry afterward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being asked to wear a condom is like being offered a sumptuous feast prepared by your favorite chef and then being told you won't be able to taste it.
Sure, you can eat the meal, feel somewhat sated afterward, but you've lost all the delicate and bold flavors, the textures and sensations.
You've lost the joy of the experience, even if you aren't [as] hungry afterward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435587</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use a garden hose as a condom you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a garden hose as a condom you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a garden hose as a condom you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431411</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe because it feels like you're trying to mate with a garden hose.</p></div><p>I've heard this over and over, and tried it both ways, and I think you're full of shit. It's exactly the same, except for cleanup and other details. Temporary loss of erection is present and kinda weird, but I suspect that's maybe related to the constriction of blood supply. Plus, ya know, temporary.</p><p>The question is, why do people keep saying this? It always *sounds* kind of like outrage, but why would one be outraged over something that doesn't actually happen?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe because it feels like you 're trying to mate with a garden hose.I 've heard this over and over , and tried it both ways , and I think you 're full of shit .
It 's exactly the same , except for cleanup and other details .
Temporary loss of erection is present and kinda weird , but I suspect that 's maybe related to the constriction of blood supply .
Plus , ya know , temporary.The question is , why do people keep saying this ?
It always * sounds * kind of like outrage , but why would one be outraged over something that does n't actually happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe because it feels like you're trying to mate with a garden hose.I've heard this over and over, and tried it both ways, and I think you're full of shit.
It's exactly the same, except for cleanup and other details.
Temporary loss of erection is present and kinda weird, but I suspect that's maybe related to the constriction of blood supply.
Plus, ya know, temporary.The question is, why do people keep saying this?
It always *sounds* kind of like outrage, but why would one be outraged over something that doesn't actually happen?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432959</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>p!ngu</author>
	<datestamp>1245681180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not true, and further, it's inhumane. Please try to avoid encouraging the death of people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not true , and further , it 's inhumane .
Please try to avoid encouraging the death of people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not true, and further, it's inhumane.
Please try to avoid encouraging the death of people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440463</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>commandlinegamer</author>
	<datestamp>1245778140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm desperately trying to come up with a retort to that that involves sharks..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm desperately trying to come up with a retort to that that involves sharks. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm desperately trying to come up with a retort to that that involves sharks..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432109</id>
	<title>Abstract from NIH</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245677160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the NIH CRISP db:</p><p>http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/CRISP\_LIB.getdoc?textkey=7619840&amp;p\_grant\_num=1R21HD060447-01&amp;p\_query=(condom)&amp;ticket=97286703&amp;p\_audit\_session\_id=473066379&amp;p\_audit\_score=100&amp;p\_audit\_numfound=1&amp;p\_keywords=condom</p><p>Abstract:  DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks. About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior. About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission. Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring. Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs. Yet, studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use. This project aims to advance our understanding of, among other factors, the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young, heterosexual adult men. A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires, observational, and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention. The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative, more effective, and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks. Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs, yet studies show that problems with condom use are common. This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young, heterosexual adult men.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the NIH CRISP db : http : //crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/CRISP \ _LIB.getdoc ? textkey = 7619840&amp;p \ _grant \ _num = 1R21HD060447-01&amp;p \ _query = ( condom ) &amp;ticket = 97286703&amp;p \ _audit \ _session \ _id = 473066379&amp;p \ _audit \ _score = 100&amp;p \ _audit \ _numfound = 1&amp;p \ _keywords = condomAbstract : DESCRIPTION ( provided by applicant ) : Sexually transmitted infections ( STI ) , including human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) , pose significant health risks .
About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior .
About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission .
Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring .
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs .
Yet , studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use .
This project aims to advance our understanding of , among other factors , the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young , heterosexual adult men .
A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires , observational , and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention .
The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative , more effective , and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively .
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE : Sexually transmitted infections ( STI ) , including human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) , pose significant health risks .
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs , yet studies show that problems with condom use are common .
This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young , heterosexual adult men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the NIH CRISP db:http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/CRISP\_LIB.getdoc?textkey=7619840&amp;p\_grant\_num=1R21HD060447-01&amp;p\_query=(condom)&amp;ticket=97286703&amp;p\_audit\_session\_id=473066379&amp;p\_audit\_score=100&amp;p\_audit\_numfound=1&amp;p\_keywords=condomAbstract:  DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks.
About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior.
About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission.
Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring.
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs.
Yet, studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use.
This project aims to advance our understanding of, among other factors, the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young, heterosexual adult men.
A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires, observational, and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention.
The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative, more effective, and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks.
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs, yet studies show that problems with condom use are common.
This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young, heterosexual adult men.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439693</id>
	<title>Condom?</title>
	<author>binaryartist</author>
	<datestamp>1245774960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is that? Sometimes, between my science projects and working on my toys in my parent's basement, I need more context when talking about such topics</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is that ?
Sometimes , between my science projects and working on my toys in my parent 's basement , I need more context when talking about such topics</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is that?
Sometimes, between my science projects and working on my toys in my parent's basement, I need more context when talking about such topics</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438235</id>
	<title>This is pretty fucking pathetic.</title>
	<author>maillemaker</author>
	<datestamp>1245768960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;One measure we give is we have 20 different "steps" for using a condom properly, and they're out<br>&gt;of order, and some are not real steps. Out of ~250 teenagers, most of whom have taken sex ed,<br>&gt;been exposed to safer sex info all their lives, only 6 got that exercise 100\% correct (all real<br>&gt;steps in proper order, all fake steps removed), and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct<br>&gt;order (but kept some of the fake steps). The kids have been taught, but retention isn't so hot -<br>&gt;we're coming up with better ways to teach this.</p><p>This is pretty fucking pathetic.  But partly, I blame you guys for coming up with TWENTY steps for putting on a condom.</p><p>This is not rocket science.  You take it out of the foil, figure out which way the thing rolls, stick it on your penis, and roll it on down until it doesn't roll anymore.  Give it a couple tugs on the tip to make a place for the sperm to go and you're ready for battle, soldier.  I count FIVE steps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; One measure we give is we have 20 different " steps " for using a condom properly , and they 're out &gt; of order , and some are not real steps .
Out of ~ 250 teenagers , most of whom have taken sex ed , &gt; been exposed to safer sex info all their lives , only 6 got that exercise 100 \ % correct ( all real &gt; steps in proper order , all fake steps removed ) , and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct &gt; order ( but kept some of the fake steps ) .
The kids have been taught , but retention is n't so hot - &gt; we 're coming up with better ways to teach this.This is pretty fucking pathetic .
But partly , I blame you guys for coming up with TWENTY steps for putting on a condom.This is not rocket science .
You take it out of the foil , figure out which way the thing rolls , stick it on your penis , and roll it on down until it does n't roll anymore .
Give it a couple tugs on the tip to make a place for the sperm to go and you 're ready for battle , soldier .
I count FIVE steps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;One measure we give is we have 20 different "steps" for using a condom properly, and they're out&gt;of order, and some are not real steps.
Out of ~250 teenagers, most of whom have taken sex ed,&gt;been exposed to safer sex info all their lives, only 6 got that exercise 100\% correct (all real&gt;steps in proper order, all fake steps removed), and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct&gt;order (but kept some of the fake steps).
The kids have been taught, but retention isn't so hot -&gt;we're coming up with better ways to teach this.This is pretty fucking pathetic.
But partly, I blame you guys for coming up with TWENTY steps for putting on a condom.This is not rocket science.
You take it out of the foil, figure out which way the thing rolls, stick it on your penis, and roll it on down until it doesn't roll anymore.
Give it a couple tugs on the tip to make a place for the sperm to go and you're ready for battle, soldier.
I count FIVE steps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</id>
	<title>it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1245672480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it can make your dick go limp</p><p>its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now</p><p>(with apologies to all of the IRS fetishists)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it can make your dick go limpits the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now ( with apologies to all of the IRS fetishists )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it can make your dick go limpits the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now(with apologies to all of the IRS fetishists)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442603</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.</p></div><p>Unless you've ever tried to use a garden hose, how would you know?  Now there are a thousand young men out there thinking, "hmm, garden hose, hmm".</p><p>Also, apparently you are of the "smallish" size and don't realize that a "larger" man finds condoms to be completely worthless for satisfying sex.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It feels like a garden hose " is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.Unless you 've ever tried to use a garden hose , how would you know ?
Now there are a thousand young men out there thinking , " hmm , garden hose , hmm " .Also , apparently you are of the " smallish " size and do n't realize that a " larger " man finds condoms to be completely worthless for satisfying sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.Unless you've ever tried to use a garden hose, how would you know?
Now there are a thousand young men out there thinking, "hmm, garden hose, hmm".Also, apparently you are of the "smallish" size and don't realize that a "larger" man finds condoms to be completely worthless for satisfying sex.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439547</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1245774540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To quote: "Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials."</p></div><p>To add what they left out: "...  for people that don't wash it."</p><p>Granted, there are a lot of people that don't wash themselves, but for those of us that do, it doesn't matter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To quote : " Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials .
" To add what they left out : " ... for people that do n't wash it .
" Granted , there are a lot of people that do n't wash themselves , but for those of us that do , it does n't matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To quote: "Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials.
"To add what they left out: "...  for people that don't wash it.
"Granted, there are a lot of people that don't wash themselves, but for those of us that do, it doesn't matter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432163</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1245677400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it's probably as much to say "how can we market them better so that men make a different decision."  It might be about redesign, but there are a lot of limiting factors; you can't make them looser without compromising their reliability... you have few choices of materials for stuff that's thin enough without being porous to viruses and sperm... and there's not a lot you can do about putting them on.</p><p>Or maybe there is.  Maybe they can design a cardboard sleeve applicator, so you just slide it around your member and pull it off and there ya go, no fuss no muss.  That might help a bit.  It'd be harder to keep in your pocket maybe... but they could probably make it fold flat.  Sort of like a Hot Pocket sleeve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's probably as much to say " how can we market them better so that men make a different decision .
" It might be about redesign , but there are a lot of limiting factors ; you ca n't make them looser without compromising their reliability... you have few choices of materials for stuff that 's thin enough without being porous to viruses and sperm... and there 's not a lot you can do about putting them on.Or maybe there is .
Maybe they can design a cardboard sleeve applicator , so you just slide it around your member and pull it off and there ya go , no fuss no muss .
That might help a bit .
It 'd be harder to keep in your pocket maybe... but they could probably make it fold flat .
Sort of like a Hot Pocket sleeve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's probably as much to say "how can we market them better so that men make a different decision.
"  It might be about redesign, but there are a lot of limiting factors; you can't make them looser without compromising their reliability... you have few choices of materials for stuff that's thin enough without being porous to viruses and sperm... and there's not a lot you can do about putting them on.Or maybe there is.
Maybe they can design a cardboard sleeve applicator, so you just slide it around your member and pull it off and there ya go, no fuss no muss.
That might help a bit.
It'd be harder to keep in your pocket maybe... but they could probably make it fold flat.
Sort of like a Hot Pocket sleeve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435213</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>wisty</author>
	<datestamp>1245696780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The #1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra.</p><p>#2 is that Americans generally don't even question it.</p></div><p>It's sad, but I expect that is probably the case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The # 1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra. # 2 is that Americans generally do n't even question it.It 's sad , but I expect that is probably the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The #1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra.#2 is that Americans generally don't even question it.It's sad, but I expect that is probably the case.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431487</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>gmhowell</author>
	<datestamp>1245674280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't you get the memo? Only women have reproductive rights in the US. They will split things with you however and give you all the bills.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't you get the memo ?
Only women have reproductive rights in the US .
They will split things with you however and give you all the bills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't you get the memo?
Only women have reproductive rights in the US.
They will split things with you however and give you all the bills.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435135</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Start smoking pot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Start smoking pot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start smoking pot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439163</id>
	<title>Waste</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245773160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a waste of taxpayers money.  Everyone knows why men don't like to wear condoms. Now we need a study to determine why women are unbearable once a month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a waste of taxpayers money .
Everyone knows why men do n't like to wear condoms .
Now we need a study to determine why women are unbearable once a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a waste of taxpayers money.
Everyone knows why men don't like to wear condoms.
Now we need a study to determine why women are unbearable once a month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430925</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Rakshasa Taisab</author>
	<datestamp>1245672540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what else am I supposed to mate with? Socks are much harder to clean.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what else am I supposed to mate with ?
Socks are much harder to clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what else am I supposed to mate with?
Socks are much harder to clean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432675</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>DeadCatX2</author>
	<datestamp>1245679800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They smell bad</p></div><p>I've found that it's the lubricant which smells bad.  Get the non-lubricated ones, and the smell problem is taken care of, but now you definitely need either copious amounts of saliva, or some artificial lubricant; I personally recommend a condom-safe silicone type.</p><p>I always thought that the big deal with condoms was psychological.  People think it will make sex less interesting, and then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.  But it's not all about the penis in the vagina.  There's hands to touch, grab, pinch, and stroke your partner's body; lips; eye contact; positions; sounds; and so on.  Condoms may make sex 10\% less interesting, but 90\% of awesome is still pretty cool in my book.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They smell badI 've found that it 's the lubricant which smells bad .
Get the non-lubricated ones , and the smell problem is taken care of , but now you definitely need either copious amounts of saliva , or some artificial lubricant ; I personally recommend a condom-safe silicone type.I always thought that the big deal with condoms was psychological .
People think it will make sex less interesting , and then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy .
But it 's not all about the penis in the vagina .
There 's hands to touch , grab , pinch , and stroke your partner 's body ; lips ; eye contact ; positions ; sounds ; and so on .
Condoms may make sex 10 \ % less interesting , but 90 \ % of awesome is still pretty cool in my book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They smell badI've found that it's the lubricant which smells bad.
Get the non-lubricated ones, and the smell problem is taken care of, but now you definitely need either copious amounts of saliva, or some artificial lubricant; I personally recommend a condom-safe silicone type.I always thought that the big deal with condoms was psychological.
People think it will make sex less interesting, and then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
But it's not all about the penis in the vagina.
There's hands to touch, grab, pinch, and stroke your partner's body; lips; eye contact; positions; sounds; and so on.
Condoms may make sex 10\% less interesting, but 90\% of awesome is still pretty cool in my book.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437097</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1245761340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on.</p></div><p>I think I know how you feel, even though the 'sandwich bag effect' is not that bad for me.</p><p>Problem is, they are so tight (for me) I cannot unroll them. (not in the whole). I then go for the 55mm diameter (the largest one that's easily available here) and still is difficult to unroll.</p><p>All in all, it's a lot of manouvers to get it properly placed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on.I think I know how you feel , even though the 'sandwich bag effect ' is not that bad for me.Problem is , they are so tight ( for me ) I can not unroll them .
( not in the whole ) .
I then go for the 55mm diameter ( the largest one that 's easily available here ) and still is difficult to unroll.All in all , it 's a lot of manouvers to get it properly placed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on.I think I know how you feel, even though the 'sandwich bag effect' is not that bad for me.Problem is, they are so tight (for me) I cannot unroll them.
(not in the whole).
I then go for the 55mm diameter (the largest one that's easily available here) and still is difficult to unroll.All in all, it's a lot of manouvers to get it properly placed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433641</id>
	<title>The neverending stupidity</title>
	<author>BCW2</author>
	<datestamp>1245685080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People wonder where our tax money is wasted?<br>Another fine effort from the Thundering Herd of Dumbass formerly known as Congress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People wonder where our tax money is wasted ? Another fine effort from the Thundering Herd of Dumbass formerly known as Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People wonder where our tax money is wasted?Another fine effort from the Thundering Herd of Dumbass formerly known as Congress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433225</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1245682560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am of the opposite opinion.  Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on.  Too tight is an issue, of course, but I have generally found that a "normal sized" condom, which is snug but doesn't cut off circulation.<br> <br>

For those who choose to reply to this:  please keep the comments about penis size mature (yes, I know that now everyone is going to make an immature joke about it, but really, save them for a thread where they are not as relevant).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am of the opposite opinion .
Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on .
Too tight is an issue , of course , but I have generally found that a " normal sized " condom , which is snug but does n't cut off circulation .
For those who choose to reply to this : please keep the comments about penis size mature ( yes , I know that now everyone is going to make an immature joke about it , but really , save them for a thread where they are not as relevant ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am of the opposite opinion.
Condoms that are too wide kill it for me -- it feels like having a sandwich bag on.
Too tight is an issue, of course, but I have generally found that a "normal sized" condom, which is snug but doesn't cut off circulation.
For those who choose to reply to this:  please keep the comments about penis size mature (yes, I know that now everyone is going to make an immature joke about it, but really, save them for a thread where they are not as relevant).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</id>
	<title>Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another issue, and one might say more important, is that there are so few options for men for birth control. Let's see, we have... condoms or sterilization. Great. One isn't reliable and the other can have serious side effects. How about we put that money into researching new and improved methods that have fewer and less severe side effects? Personally I would absolutely take hormonal treatments if the side effects were reasonable. It drives me crazy that as a society we are complacent with half our population not having a reliable and effective means for preventing unwanted pregnancy. Better yet things like RISUG would be absolutely wonderful, yet they don't get researched in western bureaucracy because it wouldn't be profitable enough than having people constantly paying for condoms or hormones. The injustice that has befallen us males is absolutely cause for a revolution in how we conduct health care in our society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another issue , and one might say more important , is that there are so few options for men for birth control .
Let 's see , we have... condoms or sterilization .
Great. One is n't reliable and the other can have serious side effects .
How about we put that money into researching new and improved methods that have fewer and less severe side effects ?
Personally I would absolutely take hormonal treatments if the side effects were reasonable .
It drives me crazy that as a society we are complacent with half our population not having a reliable and effective means for preventing unwanted pregnancy .
Better yet things like RISUG would be absolutely wonderful , yet they do n't get researched in western bureaucracy because it would n't be profitable enough than having people constantly paying for condoms or hormones .
The injustice that has befallen us males is absolutely cause for a revolution in how we conduct health care in our society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another issue, and one might say more important, is that there are so few options for men for birth control.
Let's see, we have... condoms or sterilization.
Great. One isn't reliable and the other can have serious side effects.
How about we put that money into researching new and improved methods that have fewer and less severe side effects?
Personally I would absolutely take hormonal treatments if the side effects were reasonable.
It drives me crazy that as a society we are complacent with half our population not having a reliable and effective means for preventing unwanted pregnancy.
Better yet things like RISUG would be absolutely wonderful, yet they don't get researched in western bureaucracy because it wouldn't be profitable enough than having people constantly paying for condoms or hormones.
The injustice that has befallen us males is absolutely cause for a revolution in how we conduct health care in our society.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432459</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because they don't let my penis touch the vagina (which is the whole idea). You can have that answer for 10\% of the cost of the study.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they do n't let my penis touch the vagina ( which is the whole idea ) .
You can have that answer for 10 \ % of the cost of the study .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they don't let my penis touch the vagina (which is the whole idea).
You can have that answer for 10\% of the cost of the study.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440803</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Dark\_Gravity</author>
	<datestamp>1245779280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what else am I supposed to mate with? Socks are much harder to clean.</p></div><p>Ever hear of a washing machine?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what else am I supposed to mate with ?
Socks are much harder to clean.Ever hear of a washing machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what else am I supposed to mate with?
Socks are much harder to clean.Ever hear of a washing machine?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442985</id>
	<title>Condom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245786840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is a condom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is a condom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is a condom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442293</id>
	<title>Are you kidding me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You gotta be kidding me right? 20 Steps? You can knock that down to FOUR and then "stupid teens" wouldn't get frustrated or make mistakes:</p><p>1. Tear open package.</p><p>2. Figure out which end is "up"</p><p>3. Place on tip, roll down as far as possible.</p><p>4. If the hole ain't lubed (either naturally or otherwise), it's not time to stick it in.</p><p>Doesn't get any more complicated than this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got ta be kidding me right ?
20 Steps ?
You can knock that down to FOUR and then " stupid teens " would n't get frustrated or make mistakes : 1 .
Tear open package.2 .
Figure out which end is " up " 3 .
Place on tip , roll down as far as possible.4 .
If the hole ai n't lubed ( either naturally or otherwise ) , it 's not time to stick it in.Does n't get any more complicated than this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You gotta be kidding me right?
20 Steps?
You can knock that down to FOUR and then "stupid teens" wouldn't get frustrated or make mistakes:1.
Tear open package.2.
Figure out which end is "up"3.
Place on tip, roll down as far as possible.4.
If the hole ain't lubed (either naturally or otherwise), it's not time to stick it in.Doesn't get any more complicated than this!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434961</id>
	<title>a science experiment for all who wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pour two glasses of warm water. In the first glass stick your finger in, notice your finger now feels warm and wet. In the second glass place your finger in again, this time covered with a plastic bag, you will notice it feels similar, warm but not wet. That will be $423,500 please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pour two glasses of warm water .
In the first glass stick your finger in , notice your finger now feels warm and wet .
In the second glass place your finger in again , this time covered with a plastic bag , you will notice it feels similar , warm but not wet .
That will be $ 423,500 please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pour two glasses of warm water.
In the first glass stick your finger in, notice your finger now feels warm and wet.
In the second glass place your finger in again, this time covered with a plastic bag, you will notice it feels similar, warm but not wet.
That will be $423,500 please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432841</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>registrar</author>
	<datestamp>1245680640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um.  Do you know what 'double blind' means?  [mind wanders...]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
Do you know what 'double blind ' means ?
[ mind wanders... ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
Do you know what 'double blind' means?
[mind wanders...]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434315</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Condoms are the biggest con around. You have to buy them in a three pack, you use one to test for fit, then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!!</p></div></blockquote><p>

That's why you use the "display item" to test for fit in the store.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Condoms are the biggest con around .
You have to buy them in a three pack , you use one to test for fit , then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away ! !
That 's why you use the " display item " to test for fit in the store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condoms are the biggest con around.
You have to buy them in a three pack, you use one to test for fit, then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!!
That's why you use the "display item" to test for fit in the store.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438173</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Creepy</author>
	<datestamp>1245768660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny that you mention it - I actually don't mind condoms as much as my wife does - in fact, I generally perform much better with them due to the reduced sensitivity and initial lubrication (which can be bad, say, after a long hot bath).  My wife, on the other hand, HATES them with a passion and would prefer abstinence to sex with a condom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny that you mention it - I actually do n't mind condoms as much as my wife does - in fact , I generally perform much better with them due to the reduced sensitivity and initial lubrication ( which can be bad , say , after a long hot bath ) .
My wife , on the other hand , HATES them with a passion and would prefer abstinence to sex with a condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny that you mention it - I actually don't mind condoms as much as my wife does - in fact, I generally perform much better with them due to the reduced sensitivity and initial lubrication (which can be bad, say, after a long hot bath).
My wife, on the other hand, HATES them with a passion and would prefer abstinence to sex with a condom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433311</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245682980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not quite as simple  as some people think it is, either.  The aversion to condoms I mean.  I certainly don't want kids or STDs, so they're a must.  Unfortunately this makes me involuntarily celibate.  I have no performance trouble at all, and in fact stay up even during the awkward fumbly time trying to get the condom on.  Soon as it's on though, down I go.  Looks like I'll just have to wait until there are vaccines for every STD and a contraceptive pill that doesn't permanently sterilize men.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not quite as simple as some people think it is , either .
The aversion to condoms I mean .
I certainly do n't want kids or STDs , so they 're a must .
Unfortunately this makes me involuntarily celibate .
I have no performance trouble at all , and in fact stay up even during the awkward fumbly time trying to get the condom on .
Soon as it 's on though , down I go .
Looks like I 'll just have to wait until there are vaccines for every STD and a contraceptive pill that does n't permanently sterilize men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not quite as simple  as some people think it is, either.
The aversion to condoms I mean.
I certainly don't want kids or STDs, so they're a must.
Unfortunately this makes me involuntarily celibate.
I have no performance trouble at all, and in fact stay up even during the awkward fumbly time trying to get the condom on.
Soon as it's on though, down I go.
Looks like I'll just have to wait until there are vaccines for every STD and a contraceptive pill that doesn't permanently sterilize men.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435713</id>
	<title>FORESKIN CAN'T MOVE -- CONDOMS NEED EXTRA LUBE</title>
	<author>cies</author>
	<datestamp>1245787920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>strange this hasn't been mentioned yet (over i overlooked it)..</p><p>when using a condom the foreskin cannot move freely. the foreskin is (in my opinion, and by just counting the nerve ends) more important than the head of the penis for sex. it also (in my opinion) helps keeping the vagina lubricated nicely, and naturally.</p><p>so when using a condom the foreskin doesn't move: missing that pleasure and have to use some artificial lube. no problem for me: i keeps some lube with my condoms and beeing a litte less sensitive can have its advantages (as the foreskin-less amoung us often advocate).<br>i rather have the sexual freedom that condoms bring me.</p><p>so solution: sell each condom with a small package of lube (preferable high quality like durex sensilube), that, to me, would solve half of the problems associated with condoms.</p><p>good luck with the research!</p><p>(ohh.. just to mention: several girls have told me that the condoms+lube thing also made the sex better for them, especially in the end of a session)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>strange this has n't been mentioned yet ( over i overlooked it ) ..when using a condom the foreskin can not move freely .
the foreskin is ( in my opinion , and by just counting the nerve ends ) more important than the head of the penis for sex .
it also ( in my opinion ) helps keeping the vagina lubricated nicely , and naturally.so when using a condom the foreskin does n't move : missing that pleasure and have to use some artificial lube .
no problem for me : i keeps some lube with my condoms and beeing a litte less sensitive can have its advantages ( as the foreskin-less amoung us often advocate ) .i rather have the sexual freedom that condoms bring me.so solution : sell each condom with a small package of lube ( preferable high quality like durex sensilube ) , that , to me , would solve half of the problems associated with condoms.good luck with the research ! ( ohh. .
just to mention : several girls have told me that the condoms + lube thing also made the sex better for them , especially in the end of a session )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>strange this hasn't been mentioned yet (over i overlooked it)..when using a condom the foreskin cannot move freely.
the foreskin is (in my opinion, and by just counting the nerve ends) more important than the head of the penis for sex.
it also (in my opinion) helps keeping the vagina lubricated nicely, and naturally.so when using a condom the foreskin doesn't move: missing that pleasure and have to use some artificial lube.
no problem for me: i keeps some lube with my condoms and beeing a litte less sensitive can have its advantages (as the foreskin-less amoung us often advocate).i rather have the sexual freedom that condoms bring me.so solution: sell each condom with a small package of lube (preferable high quality like durex sensilube), that, to me, would solve half of the problems associated with condoms.good luck with the research!(ohh..
just to mention: several girls have told me that the condoms+lube thing also made the sex better for them, especially in the end of a session)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434881</id>
	<title>Re:Another political cheap shot at public expense</title>
	<author>ndogg</author>
	<datestamp>1245693420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm scratching my head as to how you got modded insightful.  The spending on this is pittance.</p><blockquote><div><p>There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh").</p></div></blockquote><p>That's a good hypothesis.  There should be data to back up that claim.  If there isn't, there's no science to stand behind that claim.</p><blockquote><div><p>But of course, there are always going to be some selfish people who don't care about protecting other people's health, or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies. All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public, well, that's not their problem.</p></div></blockquote><p>Of course, but if better condoms could be made, they'd have one less reason not to use them, and be more inclined towards them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm scratching my head as to how you got modded insightful .
The spending on this is pittance.There is one very obvious reason why men do n't like to wear condoms ( " it does n't feel as good...duh " ) .That 's a good hypothesis .
There should be data to back up that claim .
If there is n't , there 's no science to stand behind that claim.But of course , there are always going to be some selfish people who do n't care about protecting other people 's health , or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies .
All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public , well , that 's not their problem.Of course , but if better condoms could be made , they 'd have one less reason not to use them , and be more inclined towards them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm scratching my head as to how you got modded insightful.
The spending on this is pittance.There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh").That's a good hypothesis.
There should be data to back up that claim.
If there isn't, there's no science to stand behind that claim.But of course, there are always going to be some selfish people who don't care about protecting other people's health, or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies.
All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public, well, that's not their problem.Of course, but if better condoms could be made, they'd have one less reason not to use them, and be more inclined towards them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449425</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245782880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MSNBC had recently posted an article discussing the approaching possibility of hormonal male contraceptives.  Would we have to deal with emotional side effects? Could it cause emasculating side effects? I would guess that there will be some trade-off with a male pill, too. Being happily married, it is easy enough to avoid condoms with my wife on medication; she also gains other benefits from taking the pill. Win/win. If you want more on the guy pill, though, here's the link:<br>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MSNBC had recently posted an article discussing the approaching possibility of hormonal male contraceptives .
Would we have to deal with emotional side effects ?
Could it cause emasculating side effects ?
I would guess that there will be some trade-off with a male pill , too .
Being happily married , it is easy enough to avoid condoms with my wife on medication ; she also gains other benefits from taking the pill .
Win/win. If you want more on the guy pill , though , here 's the link : http : //www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MSNBC had recently posted an article discussing the approaching possibility of hormonal male contraceptives.
Would we have to deal with emotional side effects?
Could it cause emasculating side effects?
I would guess that there will be some trade-off with a male pill, too.
Being happily married, it is easy enough to avoid condoms with my wife on medication; she also gains other benefits from taking the pill.
Win/win. If you want more on the guy pill, though, here's the link:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431067</id>
	<title>Remember everyone...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This money is part of the $1T Porkulus package. This is what happens when politicians fix things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This money is part of the $ 1T Porkulus package .
This is what happens when politicians fix things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This money is part of the $1T Porkulus package.
This is what happens when politicians fix things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442847</id>
	<title>Whomever...</title>
	<author>SlashDev</author>
	<datestamp>1245786300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. conducted this research are either men who have never had sex without a condom, or women.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. conducted this research are either men who have never had sex without a condom , or women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. conducted this research are either men who have never had sex without a condom, or women.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440215</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>celtic\_hackr</author>
	<datestamp>1245777180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they should market condom undies for women and see how they fly? Women could have sex and be protected and never have to take off their undies. Once the sex is over all they have to do is discard the attached condom and replace. It's a win win win win situation.
<br>
I think you'll find female condoms, would be as popular as male condoms.
<br>
There are numerous reasons why guys don't use condoms. These reasons are commonly known. One you have to carry them around with you and it is something that has to be opened and put on before continuing. Less sensation. Etc. etc. etc.
<br>
This has all been covered before in other studies. Hence, it is wasted tax dollars as they will get the same answer they got back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s on the epidemic spread of the (eventually) fatal STD Herpes. There are treatments now that reduce the effects of Herpes. Considering condoms have been around for millennia, and they aren't any more prevalent now as then, I doubt any study has anything NEW to find. Hence if it is unlikely to further the current knowledge, then yes it is wasted government spending. Like spending money trying to determine effect of a bullet to a dog's brain (an actual government funded research project).
<br> <br>
The money would be better spent coming up with vaccines for the various STDs. Eliminate the attack vector and you eliminate problem. Trying to get historically proven large proportions of unthinking, uncaring members of the male species to act in any other way than they historically have with the same knowledge is a fruitless waste of time.
<br> <br>
 I'm married and have no mistress(es) and therefore have no further need for condoms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they should market condom undies for women and see how they fly ?
Women could have sex and be protected and never have to take off their undies .
Once the sex is over all they have to do is discard the attached condom and replace .
It 's a win win win win situation .
I think you 'll find female condoms , would be as popular as male condoms .
There are numerous reasons why guys do n't use condoms .
These reasons are commonly known .
One you have to carry them around with you and it is something that has to be opened and put on before continuing .
Less sensation .
Etc. etc .
etc . This has all been covered before in other studies .
Hence , it is wasted tax dollars as they will get the same answer they got back in the 50s , 60s , and 70s on the epidemic spread of the ( eventually ) fatal STD Herpes .
There are treatments now that reduce the effects of Herpes .
Considering condoms have been around for millennia , and they are n't any more prevalent now as then , I doubt any study has anything NEW to find .
Hence if it is unlikely to further the current knowledge , then yes it is wasted government spending .
Like spending money trying to determine effect of a bullet to a dog 's brain ( an actual government funded research project ) .
The money would be better spent coming up with vaccines for the various STDs .
Eliminate the attack vector and you eliminate problem .
Trying to get historically proven large proportions of unthinking , uncaring members of the male species to act in any other way than they historically have with the same knowledge is a fruitless waste of time .
I 'm married and have no mistress ( es ) and therefore have no further need for condoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they should market condom undies for women and see how they fly?
Women could have sex and be protected and never have to take off their undies.
Once the sex is over all they have to do is discard the attached condom and replace.
It's a win win win win situation.
I think you'll find female condoms, would be as popular as male condoms.
There are numerous reasons why guys don't use condoms.
These reasons are commonly known.
One you have to carry them around with you and it is something that has to be opened and put on before continuing.
Less sensation.
Etc. etc.
etc.

This has all been covered before in other studies.
Hence, it is wasted tax dollars as they will get the same answer they got back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s on the epidemic spread of the (eventually) fatal STD Herpes.
There are treatments now that reduce the effects of Herpes.
Considering condoms have been around for millennia, and they aren't any more prevalent now as then, I doubt any study has anything NEW to find.
Hence if it is unlikely to further the current knowledge, then yes it is wasted government spending.
Like spending money trying to determine effect of a bullet to a dog's brain (an actual government funded research project).
The money would be better spent coming up with vaccines for the various STDs.
Eliminate the attack vector and you eliminate problem.
Trying to get historically proven large proportions of unthinking, uncaring members of the male species to act in any other way than they historically have with the same knowledge is a fruitless waste of time.
I'm married and have no mistress(es) and therefore have no further need for condoms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431381</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>qbzzt</author>
	<datestamp>1245673980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.</i></p><p>Only if you are 100\% sure you'll never want to have children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll just point out that in a steady relationship it 's \ _the \ _ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.Only if you are 100 \ % sure you 'll never want to have children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.Only if you are 100\% sure you'll never want to have children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443487</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place? If you're girlfriend's a long-term, have you considered leaving a set at her place?</p><p>Wallet - NO NO NO.  If you carry it in your pants pocket... your warmth will make the material defective.  That's what I've read and heard anyway, makes me wonder how the warmth from the actual fucking isn't supposed to affect it but oh well, still better to do what I say below:</p><p>For the one or two condoms you want to carry around with you...a cool place, shirt pocket, bag, murse hell anything slightly loose and cool, as long as there are no other sharp things in there with it, are good, best is really to have them protected in something, they handed around these neat little condom shaped cardboard cover thingies at my university once.</p><p>And yeah it should be obvious that you ought to just keep most of your condoms in their original cardboard containers at your place.  For a long-term relationship make sure that THEY also have such condoms in their original cardboard containers at their place.  Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place ?
If you 're girlfriend 's a long-term , have you considered leaving a set at her place ? Wallet - NO NO NO .
If you carry it in your pants pocket... your warmth will make the material defective .
That 's what I 've read and heard anyway , makes me wonder how the warmth from the actual fucking is n't supposed to affect it but oh well , still better to do what I say below : For the one or two condoms you want to carry around with you...a cool place , shirt pocket , bag , murse hell anything slightly loose and cool , as long as there are no other sharp things in there with it , are good , best is really to have them protected in something , they handed around these neat little condom shaped cardboard cover thingies at my university once.And yeah it should be obvious that you ought to just keep most of your condoms in their original cardboard containers at your place .
For a long-term relationship make sure that THEY also have such condoms in their original cardboard containers at their place .
Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place?
If you're girlfriend's a long-term, have you considered leaving a set at her place?Wallet - NO NO NO.
If you carry it in your pants pocket... your warmth will make the material defective.
That's what I've read and heard anyway, makes me wonder how the warmth from the actual fucking isn't supposed to affect it but oh well, still better to do what I say below:For the one or two condoms you want to carry around with you...a cool place, shirt pocket, bag, murse hell anything slightly loose and cool, as long as there are no other sharp things in there with it, are good, best is really to have them protected in something, they handed around these neat little condom shaped cardboard cover thingies at my university once.And yeah it should be obvious that you ought to just keep most of your condoms in their original cardboard containers at your place.
For a long-term relationship make sure that THEY also have such condoms in their original cardboard containers at their place.
Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431841</id>
	<title>Why do they only think of the men?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245675900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of women don't like for men to wear them also.

And it doesn't matter what flavor they come in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of women do n't like for men to wear them also .
And it does n't matter what flavor they come in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of women don't like for men to wear them also.
And it doesn't matter what flavor they come in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432927</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1245681000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do I need to explain more?</p></div><p>See? That's why you don't make the big bucks. You can bet when Kinsey is done they won't have to ask that, because they'll know that nobody will ever want anything explained to them ever again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I need to explain more ? See ?
That 's why you do n't make the big bucks .
You can bet when Kinsey is done they wo n't have to ask that , because they 'll know that nobody will ever want anything explained to them ever again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I need to explain more?See?
That's why you don't make the big bucks.
You can bet when Kinsey is done they won't have to ask that, because they'll know that nobody will ever want anything explained to them ever again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432913</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245680940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>there are so few options for men for birth control</p></div></blockquote><p>Say it with me now: Men don't give birth.<br> <br>Now, effective male <b>contraception</b> would be great. But since the male repro system is active (i.e. 'the pitcher') while a womans' is passive (i.e. 'the catcher'), stopping the passive side is the most efficient.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there are so few options for men for birth controlSay it with me now : Men do n't give birth .
Now , effective male contraception would be great .
But since the male repro system is active ( i.e .
'the pitcher ' ) while a womans ' is passive ( i.e .
'the catcher ' ) , stopping the passive side is the most efficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there are so few options for men for birth controlSay it with me now: Men don't give birth.
Now, effective male contraception would be great.
But since the male repro system is active (i.e.
'the pitcher') while a womans' is passive (i.e.
'the catcher'), stopping the passive side is the most efficient.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431809</id>
	<title>And this is how this happened...</title>
	<author>mauthbaux</author>
	<datestamp>1245675780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>from Drs. Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders, both of the Kinsey Institute.</p></div><p>Erick: Hey Steph, I'll give you $100,000.00 if you sleep with me a few times. <br>Stephanie: How many times is a few? <br>Erick: Until we reach statistical significance. <br>Steph: Cash? <br>Erick: Sure. <br> <br> Two weeks later, Erick pockets the other 300 Grand.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>from Drs .
Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders , both of the Kinsey Institute.Erick : Hey Steph , I 'll give you $ 100,000.00 if you sleep with me a few times .
Stephanie : How many times is a few ?
Erick : Until we reach statistical significance .
Steph : Cash ?
Erick : Sure .
Two weeks later , Erick pockets the other 300 Grand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from Drs.
Erick Janssen and Stephanie Sanders, both of the Kinsey Institute.Erick: Hey Steph, I'll give you $100,000.00 if you sleep with me a few times.
Stephanie: How many times is a few?
Erick: Until we reach statistical significance.
Steph: Cash?
Erick: Sure.
Two weeks later, Erick pockets the other 300 Grand.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435475</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1245699120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They smell bad,</p></div><p>Pick a better brand, there are some that aren't that bad. Plus as with anything non-toxic, preferences are often acquired and can be changed.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,</p></div><p>Not too badly, and if you're with a girl that's comfortable with using them, it's easy to make rolling it on a part of foreplay. There are very few cases where this is really an argument (e.g. the instant quicky in the elevator, where every second counts).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they decrease sensitivity,</p></div><p>For lots of men - or rather, their women - that's a <b>good</b> thing, because it makes you last longer.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they're never handy at the moment you want them,</p></div><p>Bad organisation.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.</p></div><p>Not any worse than using a towel to wipe your stuff away, is it? Oh, wait, if you think that's entirely the girls problem, then you could be right. If you think about both partners, it just shifts the responsibility of disposal from one person to the other. Plus it allows for some things you'd not otherwise consider (like going down on her to finish <b>her</b> off as well - unless you like doing that after you just came inside of her without a condom...).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They smell bad,Pick a better brand , there are some that are n't that bad .
Plus as with anything non-toxic , preferences are often acquired and can be changed.they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,Not too badly , and if you 're with a girl that 's comfortable with using them , it 's easy to make rolling it on a part of foreplay .
There are very few cases where this is really an argument ( e.g .
the instant quicky in the elevator , where every second counts ) .they decrease sensitivity,For lots of men - or rather , their women - that 's a good thing , because it makes you last longer.they 're never handy at the moment you want them,Bad organisation.they 're disgusting to take off , they 're awkward to dispose of.Not any worse than using a towel to wipe your stuff away , is it ?
Oh , wait , if you think that 's entirely the girls problem , then you could be right .
If you think about both partners , it just shifts the responsibility of disposal from one person to the other .
Plus it allows for some things you 'd not otherwise consider ( like going down on her to finish her off as well - unless you like doing that after you just came inside of her without a condom... ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They smell bad,Pick a better brand, there are some that aren't that bad.
Plus as with anything non-toxic, preferences are often acquired and can be changed.they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,Not too badly, and if you're with a girl that's comfortable with using them, it's easy to make rolling it on a part of foreplay.
There are very few cases where this is really an argument (e.g.
the instant quicky in the elevator, where every second counts).they decrease sensitivity,For lots of men - or rather, their women - that's a good thing, because it makes you last longer.they're never handy at the moment you want them,Bad organisation.they're disgusting to take off, they're awkward to dispose of.Not any worse than using a towel to wipe your stuff away, is it?
Oh, wait, if you think that's entirely the girls problem, then you could be right.
If you think about both partners, it just shifts the responsibility of disposal from one person to the other.
Plus it allows for some things you'd not otherwise consider (like going down on her to finish her off as well - unless you like doing that after you just came inside of her without a condom...).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436279</id>
	<title>Don't worry</title>
	<author>nih</author>
	<datestamp>1245751500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I will make good use of this 'research'</htmltext>
<tokenext>I will make good use of this 'research'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will make good use of this 'research'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431549</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1245674520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But think of the fun you can have trying to make catapults with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But think of the fun you can have trying to make catapults with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But think of the fun you can have trying to make catapults with them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447617</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>kfs27</author>
	<datestamp>1245763260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>theyfit.com</p><p>Some custom sized condoms will be coming soon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>theyfit.comSome custom sized condoms will be coming soon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theyfit.comSome custom sized condoms will be coming soon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435987</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1245747600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then? If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.</p></div><p>I also reply along similar lines to penile mutilation advocates: "<i>And if you'd had a daughter, you'd chop her tits off to lower her risk of breast cancer, right ?</i>"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you chop off your whole penis then ?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV , following your reasoning , it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.I also reply along similar lines to penile mutilation advocates : " And if you 'd had a daughter , you 'd chop her tits off to lower her risk of breast cancer , right ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.I also reply along similar lines to penile mutilation advocates: "And if you'd had a daughter, you'd chop her tits off to lower her risk of breast cancer, right ?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434923</id>
	<title>Not big enough...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly, I'm not hung like a horse or anything - but I've got massive girth - I'd have better luck with a freezer bag!</p><p>It's all fun and games till my cock goes numb and turns blue...</p><p>I've looked for larger ones, perhaps it's just Australia or the crap town I live in, but I've found 3 sizes larger then "regular" and not only are they all too small, the larger ones are completely without variety - no 'extra sensitive' no 'ribbed for her pleasure' just plain old 'you'd have more fun wearing an innertube'</p><p>*edit: great captcha - springs*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , I 'm not hung like a horse or anything - but I 've got massive girth - I 'd have better luck with a freezer bag ! It 's all fun and games till my cock goes numb and turns blue...I 've looked for larger ones , perhaps it 's just Australia or the crap town I live in , but I 've found 3 sizes larger then " regular " and not only are they all too small , the larger ones are completely without variety - no 'extra sensitive ' no 'ribbed for her pleasure ' just plain old 'you 'd have more fun wearing an innertube ' * edit : great captcha - springs *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, I'm not hung like a horse or anything - but I've got massive girth - I'd have better luck with a freezer bag!It's all fun and games till my cock goes numb and turns blue...I've looked for larger ones, perhaps it's just Australia or the crap town I live in, but I've found 3 sizes larger then "regular" and not only are they all too small, the larger ones are completely without variety - no 'extra sensitive' no 'ribbed for her pleasure' just plain old 'you'd have more fun wearing an innertube'*edit: great captcha - springs*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435289</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.</i></p><p>Thankfully I'm married and don't have to deal with condoms any more, but fuck, they're annoying. I've tried everything on the shelves at the local pharmacy, and there's nothing that feels good. Period.</p><p>Polyurethane condoms feel decent enough, except when they fold. Then it feels like you're fucking by the sharp end of one of those plastic electronics containers that need a knife to cut open. Tried a couple different kinds, and they all had this problem.</p><p>Condoms suck, no two ways about it. But at least I was always responsible, and never once had unsafe sex. 13 years, sex with four different girlfriends, not once. It pisses me off when guys sacrifice their long term pleasure for short term enjoyment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I 've heard , polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity , but it 's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as " guaranteed " as latex condoms.Thankfully I 'm married and do n't have to deal with condoms any more , but fuck , they 're annoying .
I 've tried everything on the shelves at the local pharmacy , and there 's nothing that feels good .
Period.Polyurethane condoms feel decent enough , except when they fold .
Then it feels like you 're fucking by the sharp end of one of those plastic electronics containers that need a knife to cut open .
Tried a couple different kinds , and they all had this problem.Condoms suck , no two ways about it .
But at least I was always responsible , and never once had unsafe sex .
13 years , sex with four different girlfriends , not once .
It pisses me off when guys sacrifice their long term pleasure for short term enjoyment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.Thankfully I'm married and don't have to deal with condoms any more, but fuck, they're annoying.
I've tried everything on the shelves at the local pharmacy, and there's nothing that feels good.
Period.Polyurethane condoms feel decent enough, except when they fold.
Then it feels like you're fucking by the sharp end of one of those plastic electronics containers that need a knife to cut open.
Tried a couple different kinds, and they all had this problem.Condoms suck, no two ways about it.
But at least I was always responsible, and never once had unsafe sex.
13 years, sex with four different girlfriends, not once.
It pisses me off when guys sacrifice their long term pleasure for short term enjoyment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437985</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245767700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</p></div><p>Turn the ribbed ones inside out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether.Turn the ribbed ones inside out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.Turn the ribbed ones inside out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433729</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1245685560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Second the Kimono recommendation, for any and all penises. They pioneered the thin condom and are significantly more comfortable (i.e. feels a little bit more like not wearing one) than the others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Second the Kimono recommendation , for any and all penises .
They pioneered the thin condom and are significantly more comfortable ( i.e .
feels a little bit more like not wearing one ) than the others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Second the Kimono recommendation, for any and all penises.
They pioneered the thin condom and are significantly more comfortable (i.e.
feels a little bit more like not wearing one) than the others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432667</id>
	<title>Female Condoms</title>
	<author>NoBozo99</author>
	<datestamp>1245679740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem solved.</p><p>Women don't have to worry about losing (ahem) enthusiasm while putting on a condom. Also, they have more motivation to insure that they don't get pregnant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem solved.Women do n't have to worry about losing ( ahem ) enthusiasm while putting on a condom .
Also , they have more motivation to insure that they do n't get pregnant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem solved.Women don't have to worry about losing (ahem) enthusiasm while putting on a condom.
Also, they have more motivation to insure that they don't get pregnant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434947</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are you, the Pope?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you , the Pope ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you, the Pope?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433183</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1245682320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9. Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh, causing itching or burning. </i></p><p>There's another problem. That itching and burning means that the spermicide is irritating the epithelial tissue. This is important because it can actually increase the risk of HIV transmission. Though nonoxynol 9 kills the HIV virus, at the same time it increases the risk of male to female transmission. Your "liquid condom" idea serves men fairly well, but it's not such a great deal for the ladies.</p><p><a href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/who55/en/index.html" title="who.int" rel="nofollow">http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/who55/en/index.html</a> [who.int]</p><p><i>My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and jimmiehatz, which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem.</i></p><p>It may be a problem for you, but it's probably a dream come true for her.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms , which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9 .
Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh , causing itching or burning .
There 's another problem .
That itching and burning means that the spermicide is irritating the epithelial tissue .
This is important because it can actually increase the risk of HIV transmission .
Though nonoxynol 9 kills the HIV virus , at the same time it increases the risk of male to female transmission .
Your " liquid condom " idea serves men fairly well , but it 's not such a great deal for the ladies.http : //www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/who55/en/index.html [ who.int ] My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and jimmiehatz , which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem.It may be a problem for you , but it 's probably a dream come true for her.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9.
Problem is that many women complain about nonoxynol-9 being too harsh, causing itching or burning.
There's another problem.
That itching and burning means that the spermicide is irritating the epithelial tissue.
This is important because it can actually increase the risk of HIV transmission.
Though nonoxynol 9 kills the HIV virus, at the same time it increases the risk of male to female transmission.
Your "liquid condom" idea serves men fairly well, but it's not such a great deal for the ladies.http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/who55/en/index.html [who.int]My endorsements for men with slightly above-average penises are Kimono and jimmiehatz, which are black and may be weird for you and your partner if having a black dick is a problem.It may be a problem for you, but it's probably a dream come true for her.LK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440565</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Dark\_Gravity</author>
	<datestamp>1245778440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then? If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.</p></div><p>Unless you are the catcher, not the pitcher.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you chop off your whole penis then ?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV , following your reasoning , it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.Unless you are the catcher , not the pitcher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you chop off your whole penis then?
If by just removing the foreskin you reduce the risk of HIV, following your reasoning, it would be good to remove the whole penis which should lower the chances of getting HIV almost to zero.Unless you are the catcher, not the pitcher.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431357</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>binarybum</author>
	<datestamp>1245673920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If it's to study "why men don't like condoms", as it is being widely reported, then yes, the study is a waste of money. The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.</i></p><p>Have you ever been to the NIH?  While there are plenty more women than here on slashdot, the net sexual activity is probably pretty similar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's to study " why men do n't like condoms " , as it is being widely reported , then yes , the study is a waste of money .
The reason is obvious to anybody that 's ever used one.Have you ever been to the NIH ?
While there are plenty more women than here on slashdot , the net sexual activity is probably pretty similar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's to study "why men don't like condoms", as it is being widely reported, then yes, the study is a waste of money.
The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.Have you ever been to the NIH?
While there are plenty more women than here on slashdot, the net sexual activity is probably pretty similar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439521</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Altus</author>
	<datestamp>1245774420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  I find lifestyles to be terrible and they always seem too tight and I'm not a magnum user.</p><p>I use Okamoto Beyond 7, I find they fit well and are the least invasive.  Ive considered trying out the kimono's, people I know who use them like them a lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I find lifestyles to be terrible and they always seem too tight and I 'm not a magnum user.I use Okamoto Beyond 7 , I find they fit well and are the least invasive .
Ive considered trying out the kimono 's , people I know who use them like them a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I find lifestyles to be terrible and they always seem too tight and I'm not a magnum user.I use Okamoto Beyond 7, I find they fit well and are the least invasive.
Ive considered trying out the kimono's, people I know who use them like them a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434289</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Finally, condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes. My favorite kind, <a href="http://www.condomusa.com/8b15-condom.asp" title="condomusa.com" rel="nofollow">Trojan Large</a> [condomusa.com], have been discontinued. The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.</p> </div><p>I always thought the "Magnum" sizes were the same size as "Large", but that they just changed the name to make average sized dudes feel good about themselves when condom shopping.

"I guess I'm just too huge and need the Magnum size, that cost $4 more per box".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes .
My favorite kind , Trojan Large [ condomusa.com ] , have been discontinued .
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight .
I always thought the " Magnum " sizes were the same size as " Large " , but that they just changed the name to make average sized dudes feel good about themselves when condom shopping .
" I guess I 'm just too huge and need the Magnum size , that cost $ 4 more per box " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, condom manufacturers should offer more variance with respect to sizes.
My favorite kind, Trojan Large [condomusa.com], have been discontinued.
The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.
I always thought the "Magnum" sizes were the same size as "Large", but that they just changed the name to make average sized dudes feel good about themselves when condom shopping.
"I guess I'm just too huge and need the Magnum size, that cost $4 more per box".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432029</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1245676800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.</p></div><p>But condoms are not seen as essential primarily because of their birth control properties... it's because they can reduce disease transmission.</p><p>So, you can get a vasectomy, but if the relationship goes south, you'll *still* have use for condoms.  Sucks, don't it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll just point out that in a steady relationship it 's \ _the \ _ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.But condoms are not seen as essential primarily because of their birth control properties... it 's because they can reduce disease transmission.So , you can get a vasectomy , but if the relationship goes south , you 'll * still * have use for condoms .
Sucks , do n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll just point out that in a steady relationship it's \_the\_ most reliable method of birth control and the cheapest and simplest to implement long-term.But condoms are not seen as essential primarily because of their birth control properties... it's because they can reduce disease transmission.So, you can get a vasectomy, but if the relationship goes south, you'll *still* have use for condoms.
Sucks, don't it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435663</id>
	<title>No Shit, Sherlock.....</title>
	<author>IHC Navistar</author>
	<datestamp>1245787500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't men like condoms?</p><p>BECAUSE IT FEELS LIKE PUTTING YOUR DICK IN A VISE!</p><p>(This answer provided free of charge)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't men like condoms ? BECAUSE IT FEELS LIKE PUTTING YOUR DICK IN A VISE !
( This answer provided free of charge )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't men like condoms?BECAUSE IT FEELS LIKE PUTTING YOUR DICK IN A VISE!
(This answer provided free of charge)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444791</id>
	<title>Re:Trojans=Tight</title>
	<author>immcintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1245749700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've honestly always thought Trojan was possibly the most brilliantly named product of all time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've honestly always thought Trojan was possibly the most brilliantly named product of all time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've honestly always thought Trojan was possibly the most brilliantly named product of all time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443421</id>
	<title>Re:it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>Mab\_Mass</author>
	<datestamp>1245788400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you think it interrupts the flow, have your partner put it on you and make the act of putting it on part of the fun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think it interrupts the flow , have your partner put it on you and make the act of putting it on part of the fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think it interrupts the flow, have your partner put it on you and make the act of putting it on part of the fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435435</id>
	<title>Re:Are you serious?</title>
	<author>RileyBryan</author>
	<datestamp>1245698700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The natural feel is warm, moist, and lubricated; a condom makes it feel lukewarm, dry, and sandpapery. Not to mention how bitchy she gets when she is allergic to the spermicide or the latex. And you cant jizz cause its half as good as your hand, so you beat it up until they walk funny all week and won't let you go at it until they have made a full recovery.

That is why I found a girl I could trust, got us both tested, and put her on the pill. Almost shit my pants a time or two though...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The natural feel is warm , moist , and lubricated ; a condom makes it feel lukewarm , dry , and sandpapery .
Not to mention how bitchy she gets when she is allergic to the spermicide or the latex .
And you cant jizz cause its half as good as your hand , so you beat it up until they walk funny all week and wo n't let you go at it until they have made a full recovery .
That is why I found a girl I could trust , got us both tested , and put her on the pill .
Almost shit my pants a time or two though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The natural feel is warm, moist, and lubricated; a condom makes it feel lukewarm, dry, and sandpapery.
Not to mention how bitchy she gets when she is allergic to the spermicide or the latex.
And you cant jizz cause its half as good as your hand, so you beat it up until they walk funny all week and won't let you go at it until they have made a full recovery.
That is why I found a girl I could trust, got us both tested, and put her on the pill.
Almost shit my pants a time or two though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434967</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anthony Christian</author>
	<datestamp>1245694200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh, I am a scientist and all for data-driven analyses.

But a study on circumcision will never be "double blind. Try getting that one past the ethics boards...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , I am a scientist and all for data-driven analyses .
But a study on circumcision will never be " double blind .
Try getting that one past the ethics boards.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, I am a scientist and all for data-driven analyses.
But a study on circumcision will never be "double blind.
Try getting that one past the ethics boards...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431953</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245676380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the hell do I have to pay for someone who chooses to get a disease?  98\% or HIV infections are folks who made the choice to have unprotected sex or do IV drugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the hell do I have to pay for someone who chooses to get a disease ?
98 \ % or HIV infections are folks who made the choice to have unprotected sex or do IV drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the hell do I have to pay for someone who chooses to get a disease?
98\% or HIV infections are folks who made the choice to have unprotected sex or do IV drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</id>
	<title>DUH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because bareback is the way mother nature intended and it feels a hell of allot better. My first girlfriend at first insisted on using condoms each time and I had no problem with that. Then one night right in the heat of the moment my rubber broke while putting it on. She pretty much just said to hell with it and we did it with no condom. At that point we liked the feeling so much better that we stopped using condoms and I just pulled out every time. After a scare she decided to go on birth control which increased the fun as I could now finish the job without worrying about being a father. She put on some weight (like 7 pounds) and that was enough for her to quit the pill. We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy. Not too bad. Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.</p><p>So its a big fucking no duh as to why men don't want to use rubbers. I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because bareback is the way mother nature intended and it feels a hell of allot better .
My first girlfriend at first insisted on using condoms each time and I had no problem with that .
Then one night right in the heat of the moment my rubber broke while putting it on .
She pretty much just said to hell with it and we did it with no condom .
At that point we liked the feeling so much better that we stopped using condoms and I just pulled out every time .
After a scare she decided to go on birth control which increased the fun as I could now finish the job without worrying about being a father .
She put on some weight ( like 7 pounds ) and that was enough for her to quit the pill .
We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy .
Not too bad .
Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.So its a big fucking no duh as to why men do n't want to use rubbers .
I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because bareback is the way mother nature intended and it feels a hell of allot better.
My first girlfriend at first insisted on using condoms each time and I had no problem with that.
Then one night right in the heat of the moment my rubber broke while putting it on.
She pretty much just said to hell with it and we did it with no condom.
At that point we liked the feeling so much better that we stopped using condoms and I just pulled out every time.
After a scare she decided to go on birth control which increased the fun as I could now finish the job without worrying about being a father.
She put on some weight (like 7 pounds) and that was enough for her to quit the pill.
We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy.
Not too bad.
Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.So its a big fucking no duh as to why men don't want to use rubbers.
I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431127</id>
	<title>Thank F*ck</title>
	<author>Elitist\_Phoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1245673200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally our tax dollars doing something useful<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally our tax dollars doing something useful : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally our tax dollars doing something useful :-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433317</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Caetel</author>
	<datestamp>1245683040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe you could, you know, lower exposure to potential HIV infection instead of chopping off part of your dick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe you could , you know , lower exposure to potential HIV infection instead of chopping off part of your dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe you could, you know, lower exposure to potential HIV infection instead of chopping off part of your dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470859</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1245962880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... unrelated<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>I'm not picky, you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... unrelated ...I 'm not picky , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... unrelated ...I'm not picky, you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1245676560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They smell bad,</p></div><p>A lot of Durex's higher end stuff doesn't smell at all.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,</p></div><p>If you're partner is willing, you can make it a <b>part</b> of the moment. No loss.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they decrease sensitivity,</p></div><p>While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much. From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they're never handy at the moment you want them,</p></div><p>Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place? If you're girlfriend's a long-term, have you considered leaving a set at her place?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they're disgusting to take off,</p> </div><p>Subjective.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>they're awkward to dispose of.</p></div><p>Also subjective.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.</p></div><p>Exactly. It's all subjective.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They smell bad,A lot of Durex 's higher end stuff does n't smell at all.they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,If you 're partner is willing , you can make it a part of the moment .
No loss.they decrease sensitivity,While this is true , the good , thin and reliable latex condoms do n't mitigate it by that much .
From what I 've heard , polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity , but it 's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as " guaranteed " as latex condoms.they 're never handy at the moment you want them,Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place ?
If you 're girlfriend 's a long-term , have you considered leaving a set at her place ? they 're disgusting to take off , Subjective.they 're awkward to dispose of.Also subjective.Despite that they 're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support , or your penis turning green and falling off.Exactly .
It 's all subjective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They smell bad,A lot of Durex's higher end stuff doesn't smell at all.they distract from the spontenaity of the moment,If you're partner is willing, you can make it a part of the moment.
No loss.they decrease sensitivity,While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much.
From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.they're never handy at the moment you want them,Ever trying putting it in your wallet or a cool place?
If you're girlfriend's a long-term, have you considered leaving a set at her place?they're disgusting to take off, Subjective.they're awkward to dispose of.Also subjective.Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.Exactly.
It's all subjective.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449647</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One woman I knew used to tell me to take the condom off because she could not feel my penis give her pleasure when I wore the condom.  This was in the face of she knowing that my eleven inches in her five foot nuthin body all the way past her navel was certain to make her pregnant when my volcano of several teaspoons full of cum shot even further into her.  She would tell me to take the thing off no matter what cause she really wanted her ship to cum in and the condom was like a chain across cumm harbor.  Her husband had had a vasectomy operation and it had made him impotent, a limpdick.  Bitterness of the failure of his operation had made him a morose drunk who took his frustrations out on his wife, who turned to me and virtually the whole rest of the base NCO club for satisfaction.  So she was a pretty good judge of the effectiveness of condoms in ruining the sex act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One woman I knew used to tell me to take the condom off because she could not feel my penis give her pleasure when I wore the condom .
This was in the face of she knowing that my eleven inches in her five foot nuthin body all the way past her navel was certain to make her pregnant when my volcano of several teaspoons full of cum shot even further into her .
She would tell me to take the thing off no matter what cause she really wanted her ship to cum in and the condom was like a chain across cumm harbor .
Her husband had had a vasectomy operation and it had made him impotent , a limpdick .
Bitterness of the failure of his operation had made him a morose drunk who took his frustrations out on his wife , who turned to me and virtually the whole rest of the base NCO club for satisfaction .
So she was a pretty good judge of the effectiveness of condoms in ruining the sex act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One woman I knew used to tell me to take the condom off because she could not feel my penis give her pleasure when I wore the condom.
This was in the face of she knowing that my eleven inches in her five foot nuthin body all the way past her navel was certain to make her pregnant when my volcano of several teaspoons full of cum shot even further into her.
She would tell me to take the thing off no matter what cause she really wanted her ship to cum in and the condom was like a chain across cumm harbor.
Her husband had had a vasectomy operation and it had made him impotent, a limpdick.
Bitterness of the failure of his operation had made him a morose drunk who took his frustrations out on his wife, who turned to me and virtually the whole rest of the base NCO club for satisfaction.
So she was a pretty good judge of the effectiveness of condoms in ruining the sex act.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245676440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.</p></div><p>
Condoms made in the USA are notoriously bad quality.  They sell "ultra-thin" brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a condom could be constructed that did n't impede feeling at all , there would be huge benefits , a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies .
Condoms made in the USA are notoriously bad quality .
They sell " ultra-thin " brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a condom could be constructed that didn't impede feeling at all, there would be huge benefits, a great reduction in unwanted pregnancies.
Condoms made in the USA are notoriously bad quality.
They sell "ultra-thin" brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443601</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>coolsnowmen</author>
	<datestamp>1245789000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is important to note that reported circumcision status may be subject to misclassification. In a study of adolescents&#194; only 69\% of circumcised and 65\% of uncircumcised young men correctly identified their circumcision status as verified by physical exam [31].</p> </div><p>Someone clearly hasn't been watching enough porn</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is important to note that reported circumcision status may be subject to misclassification .
In a study of adolescents   only 69 \ % of circumcised and 65 \ % of uncircumcised young men correctly identified their circumcision status as verified by physical exam [ 31 ] .
Someone clearly has n't been watching enough porn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is important to note that reported circumcision status may be subject to misclassification.
In a study of adolescentsÂ only 69\% of circumcised and 65\% of uncircumcised young men correctly identified their circumcision status as verified by physical exam [31].
Someone clearly hasn't been watching enough porn
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435065</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1245695100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try a different brand and keep them ready on every conceivable occassion.  I can't say I've ever noticed any smell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try a different brand and keep them ready on every conceivable occassion .
I ca n't say I 've ever noticed any smell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try a different brand and keep them ready on every conceivable occassion.
I can't say I've ever noticed any smell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435959</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245790500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> Not too bad. Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.</i></p><p><i>So its a big fucking no duh as to why men don't want to use rubbers. I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart.</i> </p><p>Smart??!?! You got a long way to go if you were fucking for three years (at least) before finding out that pulling out is meaningless.</p><p>When did you find out fucking can give you babies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not too bad .
Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.So its a big fucking no duh as to why men do n't want to use rubbers .
I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart .
Smart ? ? ! ? ! You got a long way to go if you were fucking for three years ( at least ) before finding out that pulling out is meaningless.When did you find out fucking can give you babies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Not too bad.
Although after her I always use rubbers after learning a friend got his girlfriend pregnant even though he pulled out.So its a big fucking no duh as to why men don't want to use rubbers.
I still wish I could be that naive and uncaring but I have to be smart.
Smart??!?! You got a long way to go if you were fucking for three years (at least) before finding out that pulling out is meaningless.When did you find out fucking can give you babies?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440675</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>CrustyMustard</author>
	<datestamp>1245778800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can think of so many better things to spend $400,000 dollars of my tax money on during an economic crisis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of so many better things to spend $ 400,000 dollars of my tax money on during an economic crisis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of so many better things to spend $400,000 dollars of my tax money on during an economic crisis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Manip</author>
	<datestamp>1245678240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disproven? Seems scientific double-blind studies <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm" title="cdc.gov" rel="nofollow">disagree with you.</a> [cdc.gov]</p><p>To quote: "Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disproven ?
Seems scientific double-blind studies disagree with you .
[ cdc.gov ] To quote : " Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disproven?
Seems scientific double-blind studies disagree with you.
[cdc.gov]To quote: "Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439197</id>
	<title>That doesn't change the fact...</title>
	<author>sean.peters</author>
	<datestamp>1245773280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that it's immoral to cut off bits of infant's bodies to protect them against a disease that could be more effectively prevented by using condoms. What's next - will we start cutting off the breasts of infant girls? After all, it's even more effective against breast cancer than circumcision is against HIV.</p><p>If grown men want to get circumcised to help prevent STDs, that's their right (although they should understand they'd be better off with a condom). But doing so to infant boys, who can't consent to the procedure, is barbaric.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that it 's immoral to cut off bits of infant 's bodies to protect them against a disease that could be more effectively prevented by using condoms .
What 's next - will we start cutting off the breasts of infant girls ?
After all , it 's even more effective against breast cancer than circumcision is against HIV.If grown men want to get circumcised to help prevent STDs , that 's their right ( although they should understand they 'd be better off with a condom ) .
But doing so to infant boys , who ca n't consent to the procedure , is barbaric .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that it's immoral to cut off bits of infant's bodies to protect them against a disease that could be more effectively prevented by using condoms.
What's next - will we start cutting off the breasts of infant girls?
After all, it's even more effective against breast cancer than circumcision is against HIV.If grown men want to get circumcised to help prevent STDs, that's their right (although they should understand they'd be better off with a condom).
But doing so to infant boys, who can't consent to the procedure, is barbaric.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443151</id>
	<title>Re:I research condom use in teens...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to say it, but how stupid are these people?!</p><p>* Preconditions: You need to be hard..</p><p>1) Unwrap<br>2) Find opening<br>3) Unroll with no air in the tip<br>4) Fark like bunnies<br>5) Remove and discard</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to say it , but how stupid are these people ? !
* Preconditions : You need to be hard..1 ) Unwrap2 ) Find opening3 ) Unroll with no air in the tip4 ) Fark like bunnies5 ) Remove and discard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to say it, but how stupid are these people?!
* Preconditions: You need to be hard..1) Unwrap2) Find opening3) Unroll with no air in the tip4) Fark like bunnies5) Remove and discard</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448173</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>gonz</author>
	<datestamp>1245768240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting point... except that a lifetime cost of $648,000 is worth way less than $400,000 up front.  Give me $400,000 today, and I'll happily pay you $1800/month for the next 30 years.  Just tell me where to send the checks!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>-Gonz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting point... except that a lifetime cost of $ 648,000 is worth way less than $ 400,000 up front .
Give me $ 400,000 today , and I 'll happily pay you $ 1800/month for the next 30 years .
Just tell me where to send the checks !
; - ) -Gonz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting point... except that a lifetime cost of $648,000 is worth way less than $400,000 up front.
Give me $400,000 today, and I'll happily pay you $1800/month for the next 30 years.
Just tell me where to send the checks!
;-)-Gonz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435075</id>
	<title>Cultural reasons</title>
	<author>pgbrandao</author>
	<datestamp>1245695160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's one thing for men to not like condoms, and it's quite another for them to not use them altogether even when they're aware it's needed. Most everybody knows they can be uncomfortable, reduce sensitivity, smelly, and all that, not to mention they kill the mood when you're aroused. However, they're necessary! So why be ignorant?<br><br>I'm currently living in Brazil and it's consensus here that condoms must be worn. I'd wager a bet it has something to do with the openness with which we talk about sex. Condoms are distributed by the government at health centers and schools. Plenty of government ads promote the usage of condoms (especially during february). This seems to affect mostly younger people (up to 24 years), but the results are reasonable: 68\% of the people between 15 and 24 years old used a condom during their last sexual relation with a non-fixed partner.<br><br>Also, I think porn plays a role on this. It's actually common to see condoms in brazilian porn! Not so on american porn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's one thing for men to not like condoms , and it 's quite another for them to not use them altogether even when they 're aware it 's needed .
Most everybody knows they can be uncomfortable , reduce sensitivity , smelly , and all that , not to mention they kill the mood when you 're aroused .
However , they 're necessary !
So why be ignorant ? I 'm currently living in Brazil and it 's consensus here that condoms must be worn .
I 'd wager a bet it has something to do with the openness with which we talk about sex .
Condoms are distributed by the government at health centers and schools .
Plenty of government ads promote the usage of condoms ( especially during february ) .
This seems to affect mostly younger people ( up to 24 years ) , but the results are reasonable : 68 \ % of the people between 15 and 24 years old used a condom during their last sexual relation with a non-fixed partner.Also , I think porn plays a role on this .
It 's actually common to see condoms in brazilian porn !
Not so on american porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's one thing for men to not like condoms, and it's quite another for them to not use them altogether even when they're aware it's needed.
Most everybody knows they can be uncomfortable, reduce sensitivity, smelly, and all that, not to mention they kill the mood when you're aroused.
However, they're necessary!
So why be ignorant?I'm currently living in Brazil and it's consensus here that condoms must be worn.
I'd wager a bet it has something to do with the openness with which we talk about sex.
Condoms are distributed by the government at health centers and schools.
Plenty of government ads promote the usage of condoms (especially during february).
This seems to affect mostly younger people (up to 24 years), but the results are reasonable: 68\% of the people between 15 and 24 years old used a condom during their last sexual relation with a non-fixed partner.Also, I think porn plays a role on this.
It's actually common to see condoms in brazilian porn!
Not so on american porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430945</id>
	<title>Lovemaking vs. Hoagie Stuffing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you really call it "making love" if you have to put on plastic gloves like a freakin' subway sandwich artist?  Really intimate...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you really call it " making love " if you have to put on plastic gloves like a freakin ' subway sandwich artist ?
Really intimate.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you really call it "making love" if you have to put on plastic gloves like a freakin' subway sandwich artist?
Really intimate...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450731</id>
	<title>I am amazed ....</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1245844140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that there are people out there that still think that coitus interruptus is an effective birth control method....</p><p>For all of you reading: once there is unprotected penetrative sex, all the bets are off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that there are people out there that still think that coitus interruptus is an effective birth control method....For all of you reading : once there is unprotected penetrative sex , all the bets are off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that there are people out there that still think that coitus interruptus is an effective birth control method....For all of you reading: once there is unprotected penetrative sex, all the bets are off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448197</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245768480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out TheyFit condoms, which you can buy from condomania.com. They come in a large number of different sizes, and you print out a Fit Kit to measure your weenie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out TheyFit condoms , which you can buy from condomania.com .
They come in a large number of different sizes , and you print out a Fit Kit to measure your weenie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out TheyFit condoms, which you can buy from condomania.com.
They come in a large number of different sizes, and you print out a Fit Kit to measure your weenie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431281</id>
	<title>err</title>
	<author>screamphilling</author>
	<datestamp>1245673740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think guys are biologically programmed to want to cum as deep inside a girl as possible.  (at least I am)  It feels so much better and more fulfilling.  Whenever I clear the pipes inside the condom (at least when the reservoir is small) it's always disappointing.  I can feel it hit that latex barrier.  Even with pulling out, you've always gotta go somewhere.  The second best place is the mouth of course...<br> <br>

My girlfriend says that she finds it hott when I cum inside her.  <br> <br>

Granted, condoms are definitely worth it for the risk-reducing factor.  The new Durex Avanti synthetic latex are pretty nice.  Reservoir stretches out pretty nicely.  Also the natural-lamb but they are hella expensive and don't prevent stds...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think guys are biologically programmed to want to cum as deep inside a girl as possible .
( at least I am ) It feels so much better and more fulfilling .
Whenever I clear the pipes inside the condom ( at least when the reservoir is small ) it 's always disappointing .
I can feel it hit that latex barrier .
Even with pulling out , you 've always got ta go somewhere .
The second best place is the mouth of course.. . My girlfriend says that she finds it hott when I cum inside her .
Granted , condoms are definitely worth it for the risk-reducing factor .
The new Durex Avanti synthetic latex are pretty nice .
Reservoir stretches out pretty nicely .
Also the natural-lamb but they are hella expensive and do n't prevent stds.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think guys are biologically programmed to want to cum as deep inside a girl as possible.
(at least I am)  It feels so much better and more fulfilling.
Whenever I clear the pipes inside the condom (at least when the reservoir is small) it's always disappointing.
I can feel it hit that latex barrier.
Even with pulling out, you've always gotta go somewhere.
The second best place is the mouth of course... 

My girlfriend says that she finds it hott when I cum inside her.
Granted, condoms are definitely worth it for the risk-reducing factor.
The new Durex Avanti synthetic latex are pretty nice.
Reservoir stretches out pretty nicely.
Also the natural-lamb but they are hella expensive and don't prevent stds...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444419</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>bckrispi</author>
	<datestamp>1245748500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>heat seeking moisture missile</p></div></blockquote><p>

+1 Obscure Gwar lyric (You didn't bargain on the power of the Death Pod, didja?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>heat seeking moisture missile + 1 Obscure Gwar lyric ( You did n't bargain on the power of the Death Pod , didja ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heat seeking moisture missile

+1 Obscure Gwar lyric (You didn't bargain on the power of the Death Pod, didja?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430841</id>
	<title>Because....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it feels like picking your nose while wearing a latex glove....?</p><p>I will take that $400k now, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it feels like picking your nose while wearing a latex glove.... ? I will take that $ 400k now , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it feels like picking your nose while wearing a latex glove....?I will take that $400k now, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432149</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245677340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two things.</p><p>First, which brand have you had the best feeling with?</p><p>Two, you must admit there is a possibility that while it feels the same for you with and without a condom, that it may feel differently for someone else, the whole "your results will vary" thing in all parts of medicine.</p><p>All other things being equal, I would have sex without a condom 10 times out of 10 if I was just basing it on the feeling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two things.First , which brand have you had the best feeling with ? Two , you must admit there is a possibility that while it feels the same for you with and without a condom , that it may feel differently for someone else , the whole " your results will vary " thing in all parts of medicine.All other things being equal , I would have sex without a condom 10 times out of 10 if I was just basing it on the feeling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two things.First, which brand have you had the best feeling with?Two, you must admit there is a possibility that while it feels the same for you with and without a condom, that it may feel differently for someone else, the whole "your results will vary" thing in all parts of medicine.All other things being equal, I would have sex without a condom 10 times out of 10 if I was just basing it on the feeling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433165</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1245682200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one."<br> <br>

No, it is only obvious to someone who has used one, and also not had sex without using one.  Someone with no points of comparison will not know the difference in sensation.  I was once told that the worst thing someone can do is have unprotected sex before they are married -- because they will not want to go back to using a condom.<br> <br>

Of course, there are other issues, like the fact that in the middle of an intimate moment, one needs to stop, open the condom wrapper (not always easy to do), get it on one's penis (while maintain an erection -- and of course, having your partner help you maintain an erection makes opening the wrapper that much harder), and then go about doing your business.  Speaking from my own experience, it is usually easy to forget about the disturbance caused by getting a condom on during an intimate moment, but I know men who do not feel the same way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The reason is obvious to anybody that 's ever used one .
" No , it is only obvious to someone who has used one , and also not had sex without using one .
Someone with no points of comparison will not know the difference in sensation .
I was once told that the worst thing someone can do is have unprotected sex before they are married -- because they will not want to go back to using a condom .
Of course , there are other issues , like the fact that in the middle of an intimate moment , one needs to stop , open the condom wrapper ( not always easy to do ) , get it on one 's penis ( while maintain an erection -- and of course , having your partner help you maintain an erection makes opening the wrapper that much harder ) , and then go about doing your business .
Speaking from my own experience , it is usually easy to forget about the disturbance caused by getting a condom on during an intimate moment , but I know men who do not feel the same way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The reason is obvious to anybody that's ever used one.
" 

No, it is only obvious to someone who has used one, and also not had sex without using one.
Someone with no points of comparison will not know the difference in sensation.
I was once told that the worst thing someone can do is have unprotected sex before they are married -- because they will not want to go back to using a condom.
Of course, there are other issues, like the fact that in the middle of an intimate moment, one needs to stop, open the condom wrapper (not always easy to do), get it on one's penis (while maintain an erection -- and of course, having your partner help you maintain an erection makes opening the wrapper that much harder), and then go about doing your business.
Speaking from my own experience, it is usually easy to forget about the disturbance caused by getting a condom on during an intimate moment, but I know men who do not feel the same way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437899</id>
	<title>Just as simple as...</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1245767100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't it be just as simple as:</p><p>A: It's in conflict with the basic instinct of breeding</p><p>B: It's an additional expense</p><p>C: It's a physical barrier</p><p>D: We are lazy</p><p>$400k to study this? Hell I just saved us at least $800k since when has anything the government done in the last 40 years been on or under budget?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't it be just as simple as : A : It 's in conflict with the basic instinct of breedingB : It 's an additional expenseC : It 's a physical barrierD : We are lazy $ 400k to study this ?
Hell I just saved us at least $ 800k since when has anything the government done in the last 40 years been on or under budget ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't it be just as simple as:A: It's in conflict with the basic instinct of breedingB: It's an additional expenseC: It's a physical barrierD: We are lazy$400k to study this?
Hell I just saved us at least $800k since when has anything the government done in the last 40 years been on or under budget?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432819</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1245680520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While i agree that your numbers might be correct, why is spending 400k for a 'mr obvious moment' worthwhile?  10 bucks for an 'official' pad of paper and and a random interview on the street would have been just as accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While i agree that your numbers might be correct , why is spending 400k for a 'mr obvious moment ' worthwhile ?
10 bucks for an 'official ' pad of paper and and a random interview on the street would have been just as accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While i agree that your numbers might be correct, why is spending 400k for a 'mr obvious moment' worthwhile?
10 bucks for an 'official' pad of paper and and a random interview on the street would have been just as accurate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435805</id>
	<title>wheres the obvious chicken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Im with everyone else, in that theyre moment killers if you fumble getting the packet open (although find a girl who can put one on with her mouth and that goes away very rapidly once its open), and they kill the sensation. Sometimes thats good (read delay spray without the aerosols) but by and large its very not. And Ive tried the sensitive brands too.<br>Now here's where I differ to your average slashdotter, Im in a very long term relationship, in fact Ive been married for 9 years and have two children by my wife. Even now we don't like condoms and the pill messes with her liver so she cant use it. So rather than have to use condoms I had a sterilization (and the old fashioned way, 2cm took out of each vas deferen for analysis, since where I am its illegal to have yourself "mutilated" without it being for cancer testing, damn catholic meddling) and then contracted adult chicken pox post op. And let me tell you it was a very very unpleasent combo...<br>However, do it again? damn right I would. Guilt free pleasure.</p><p>Of course if I ever were in a situation that I was going to be having sex with someone else, the old bin liner would have to come back out until I was sure she was std free.<br>There? can I have the money now. I promise to spend it on some terminal servers for the racks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Im with everyone else , in that theyre moment killers if you fumble getting the packet open ( although find a girl who can put one on with her mouth and that goes away very rapidly once its open ) , and they kill the sensation .
Sometimes thats good ( read delay spray without the aerosols ) but by and large its very not .
And Ive tried the sensitive brands too.Now here 's where I differ to your average slashdotter , Im in a very long term relationship , in fact Ive been married for 9 years and have two children by my wife .
Even now we do n't like condoms and the pill messes with her liver so she cant use it .
So rather than have to use condoms I had a sterilization ( and the old fashioned way , 2cm took out of each vas deferen for analysis , since where I am its illegal to have yourself " mutilated " without it being for cancer testing , damn catholic meddling ) and then contracted adult chicken pox post op .
And let me tell you it was a very very unpleasent combo...However , do it again ?
damn right I would .
Guilt free pleasure.Of course if I ever were in a situation that I was going to be having sex with someone else , the old bin liner would have to come back out until I was sure she was std free.There ?
can I have the money now .
I promise to spend it on some terminal servers for the racks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im with everyone else, in that theyre moment killers if you fumble getting the packet open (although find a girl who can put one on with her mouth and that goes away very rapidly once its open), and they kill the sensation.
Sometimes thats good (read delay spray without the aerosols) but by and large its very not.
And Ive tried the sensitive brands too.Now here's where I differ to your average slashdotter, Im in a very long term relationship, in fact Ive been married for 9 years and have two children by my wife.
Even now we don't like condoms and the pill messes with her liver so she cant use it.
So rather than have to use condoms I had a sterilization (and the old fashioned way, 2cm took out of each vas deferen for analysis, since where I am its illegal to have yourself "mutilated" without it being for cancer testing, damn catholic meddling) and then contracted adult chicken pox post op.
And let me tell you it was a very very unpleasent combo...However, do it again?
damn right I would.
Guilt free pleasure.Of course if I ever were in a situation that I was going to be having sex with someone else, the old bin liner would have to come back out until I was sure she was std free.There?
can I have the money now.
I promise to spend it on some terminal servers for the racks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432465</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.</p></div><p>heheheh you said weenie.</p><p>captcha: itself</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.heheheh you said weenie.captcha : itself</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Magnums are too large for my weenie and regulars are too tight.heheheh you said weenie.captcha: itself
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432875</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245680760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know what's decreases risk of HIV even more?</p><p>Condoms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know what 's decreases risk of HIV even more ? Condoms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know what's decreases risk of HIV even more?Condoms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</id>
	<title>Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt;"a project government watchdogs say is a nearly-half-a-million-dollar waste of taxpayer money"<br> <br>

the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $400,000 and can run as high as $648,000<br> <br>
(http://www.advocate.com/news\_detail\_ektid19334.asp)

<p>So, if only TWO PEOPLE on government health care (Medicaid, Medicare, Veterans or Prisoners) DON'T get AIDS as a result of this study, then it saved us money.</p><p>I'd say that's a pretty good investment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; " a project government watchdogs say is a nearly-half-a-million-dollar waste of taxpayer money " the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $ 400,000 and can run as high as $ 648,000 ( http : //www.advocate.com/news \ _detail \ _ektid19334.asp ) So , if only TWO PEOPLE on government health care ( Medicaid , Medicare , Veterans or Prisoners ) DO N'T get AIDS as a result of this study , then it saved us money.I 'd say that 's a pretty good investment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;"a project government watchdogs say is a nearly-half-a-million-dollar waste of taxpayer money" 

the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $400,000 and can run as high as $648,000 
(http://www.advocate.com/news\_detail\_ektid19334.asp)

So, if only TWO PEOPLE on government health care (Medicaid, Medicare, Veterans or Prisoners) DON'T get AIDS as a result of this study, then it saved us money.I'd say that's a pretty good investment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431591</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Hubbell</author>
	<datestamp>1245674700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm showing this post to my dad cause he's met his fair share of crazy bitches in his life, and this post will make him laugh his ass off.  Charlie Harper is his hero at the moment, but I'm quite sure your buddy will be once he reads this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm showing this post to my dad cause he 's met his fair share of crazy bitches in his life , and this post will make him laugh his ass off .
Charlie Harper is his hero at the moment , but I 'm quite sure your buddy will be once he reads this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm showing this post to my dad cause he's met his fair share of crazy bitches in his life, and this post will make him laugh his ass off.
Charlie Harper is his hero at the moment, but I'm quite sure your buddy will be once he reads this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438591</id>
	<title>$400K to figure out why men don't like condoms</title>
	<author>rs232</author>
	<datestamp>1245770700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cause it dampens the sensory inputs to your willie - DOH !!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cause it dampens the sensory inputs to your willie - DOH ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cause it dampens the sensory inputs to your willie - DOH !!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439833</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245775620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.</p></div><p>Really? Go stick your pecker in a garden hose &amp; it'll make sense. But I'll save you the trouble. Garden hoses are rubbery, semi-rigid, and cold. Condoms are rubbery, feel like they are semi-rigid, and cold. Now give me $400,000.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Something else must be going on</p></div><p>Ummm why? Why is it such a hard thing to understand that some people just don't like it? I know people that wear only silk underwear, others who wear anything except silk. Why? Because they like how it feels, or they don't. Same thing here, it's more a matter of preference than science.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Are some men using condoms wrong?</p></div><p>Probably. There is also this little issue that condoms are generally sold in one size, and if you need large or small ones it's tough to find... and like all "one size fits most" products, one size POORLY fits most.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex?</p> </div><p>This has absolutely nothing to do with how a condom feels.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It feels like a garden hose " is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.Really ?
Go stick your pecker in a garden hose &amp; it 'll make sense .
But I 'll save you the trouble .
Garden hoses are rubbery , semi-rigid , and cold .
Condoms are rubbery , feel like they are semi-rigid , and cold .
Now give me $ 400,000.Something else must be going onUmmm why ?
Why is it such a hard thing to understand that some people just do n't like it ?
I know people that wear only silk underwear , others who wear anything except silk .
Why ? Because they like how it feels , or they do n't .
Same thing here , it 's more a matter of preference than science.Are some men using condoms wrong ? Probably .
There is also this little issue that condoms are generally sold in one size , and if you need large or small ones it 's tough to find... and like all " one size fits most " products , one size POORLY fits most.Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex ?
This has absolutely nothing to do with how a condom feels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.Really?
Go stick your pecker in a garden hose &amp; it'll make sense.
But I'll save you the trouble.
Garden hoses are rubbery, semi-rigid, and cold.
Condoms are rubbery, feel like they are semi-rigid, and cold.
Now give me $400,000.Something else must be going onUmmm why?
Why is it such a hard thing to understand that some people just don't like it?
I know people that wear only silk underwear, others who wear anything except silk.
Why? Because they like how it feels, or they don't.
Same thing here, it's more a matter of preference than science.Are some men using condoms wrong?Probably.
There is also this little issue that condoms are generally sold in one size, and if you need large or small ones it's tough to find... and like all "one size fits most" products, one size POORLY fits most.Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex?
This has absolutely nothing to do with how a condom feels.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434757</id>
	<title>Epic Fail</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geez, what a waste of money.<br> <br>I coulda told them why for only $100,000!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , what a waste of money .
I coulda told them why for only $ 100,000 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, what a waste of money.
I coulda told them why for only $100,000!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444175</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245747600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was your kids skin color different?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was your kids skin color different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was your kids skin color different?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</id>
	<title>Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Condoms are the biggest con around. You have to buy them in a three pack, you use one to test for fit, then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Condoms are the biggest con around .
You have to buy them in a three pack , you use one to test for fit , then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condoms are the biggest con around.
You have to buy them in a three pack, you use one to test for fit, then you notice they have a use-by date only four years away!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436117</id>
	<title>simple..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245749400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wearing a condom whilst having sex is like having a shower with your socks on</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wearing a condom whilst having sex is like having a shower with your socks on</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wearing a condom whilst having sex is like having a shower with your socks on</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</id>
	<title>I research condom use in teens...</title>
	<author>thesandtiger</author>
	<datestamp>1245679320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and the study mentioned in the article makes perfect sense. The article is propaganda that intentionally misunderstands what the study is about in order to stir up their readership.</p><p>In one of our studies of (mostly queer) sexually active teenagers. One of the key things we look at is condom use knowledge and condom errors. Most people know that they should use a condom if they're having sex, but quite a large swath of the population doesn't know how to *properly* use them and what they do and do not protect against. Some people are perfectly willing to use condoms, but they get frustrated because they're using them wrong, and so the condoms break or come off, and they stop using them out of frustration.</p><p>One measure we give is we have 20 different "steps" for using a condom properly, and they're out of order, and some are not real steps. Out of ~250 teenagers, most of whom have taken sex ed, been exposed to safer sex info all their lives, only 6 got that exercise 100\% correct (all real steps in proper order, all fake steps removed), and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct order (but kept some of the fake steps). The kids have been taught, but retention isn't so hot - we're coming up with better ways to teach this.</p><p>Another measure we have is taking an inventory of experiences with recent condom use, and most of our participants report some level of difficulty with condom use, with most of those reports coming along the lines of it being too confusing to remember all of the steps they were taught while in the heat of the moment etc. They want to use condoms, but they've learned all of that in a very "academic" environment - we're trying to develop interventions that will help teach people how to handle themselves when they're not at their most rational.</p><p>A final measure we give which is related to condom use is an HIV &amp; STI knowledge quiz with true, false and "don't know" answers. Most of our participants score 70\% or better, but certain segments average scores below 30\%. By identifying the lagging segments and then examining what it is that is leading to this dearth of HIV &amp; STI knowledge, we're able to come up with plans to get this information out to those groups because the current techniques clearly aren't working.</p><p>It's neither an obvious nor simple area of research, despite what some in this thread will say. $400k to potentially save quite a few lives (or protect the quality of many lives) is a bargain. If you're a wretched excuse for a human being and you think that people who get HIV "deserve" it, you probably don't care that a lifetime of treatment for a single case of HIV infection will run around $400-500k (minimum) so this kind of research is also cost effective from that standpoint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and the study mentioned in the article makes perfect sense .
The article is propaganda that intentionally misunderstands what the study is about in order to stir up their readership.In one of our studies of ( mostly queer ) sexually active teenagers .
One of the key things we look at is condom use knowledge and condom errors .
Most people know that they should use a condom if they 're having sex , but quite a large swath of the population does n't know how to * properly * use them and what they do and do not protect against .
Some people are perfectly willing to use condoms , but they get frustrated because they 're using them wrong , and so the condoms break or come off , and they stop using them out of frustration.One measure we give is we have 20 different " steps " for using a condom properly , and they 're out of order , and some are not real steps .
Out of ~ 250 teenagers , most of whom have taken sex ed , been exposed to safer sex info all their lives , only 6 got that exercise 100 \ % correct ( all real steps in proper order , all fake steps removed ) , and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct order ( but kept some of the fake steps ) .
The kids have been taught , but retention is n't so hot - we 're coming up with better ways to teach this.Another measure we have is taking an inventory of experiences with recent condom use , and most of our participants report some level of difficulty with condom use , with most of those reports coming along the lines of it being too confusing to remember all of the steps they were taught while in the heat of the moment etc .
They want to use condoms , but they 've learned all of that in a very " academic " environment - we 're trying to develop interventions that will help teach people how to handle themselves when they 're not at their most rational.A final measure we give which is related to condom use is an HIV &amp; STI knowledge quiz with true , false and " do n't know " answers .
Most of our participants score 70 \ % or better , but certain segments average scores below 30 \ % .
By identifying the lagging segments and then examining what it is that is leading to this dearth of HIV &amp; STI knowledge , we 're able to come up with plans to get this information out to those groups because the current techniques clearly are n't working.It 's neither an obvious nor simple area of research , despite what some in this thread will say .
$ 400k to potentially save quite a few lives ( or protect the quality of many lives ) is a bargain .
If you 're a wretched excuse for a human being and you think that people who get HIV " deserve " it , you probably do n't care that a lifetime of treatment for a single case of HIV infection will run around $ 400-500k ( minimum ) so this kind of research is also cost effective from that standpoint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and the study mentioned in the article makes perfect sense.
The article is propaganda that intentionally misunderstands what the study is about in order to stir up their readership.In one of our studies of (mostly queer) sexually active teenagers.
One of the key things we look at is condom use knowledge and condom errors.
Most people know that they should use a condom if they're having sex, but quite a large swath of the population doesn't know how to *properly* use them and what they do and do not protect against.
Some people are perfectly willing to use condoms, but they get frustrated because they're using them wrong, and so the condoms break or come off, and they stop using them out of frustration.One measure we give is we have 20 different "steps" for using a condom properly, and they're out of order, and some are not real steps.
Out of ~250 teenagers, most of whom have taken sex ed, been exposed to safer sex info all their lives, only 6 got that exercise 100\% correct (all real steps in proper order, all fake steps removed), and only 42 got all the real steps in the correct order (but kept some of the fake steps).
The kids have been taught, but retention isn't so hot - we're coming up with better ways to teach this.Another measure we have is taking an inventory of experiences with recent condom use, and most of our participants report some level of difficulty with condom use, with most of those reports coming along the lines of it being too confusing to remember all of the steps they were taught while in the heat of the moment etc.
They want to use condoms, but they've learned all of that in a very "academic" environment - we're trying to develop interventions that will help teach people how to handle themselves when they're not at their most rational.A final measure we give which is related to condom use is an HIV &amp; STI knowledge quiz with true, false and "don't know" answers.
Most of our participants score 70\% or better, but certain segments average scores below 30\%.
By identifying the lagging segments and then examining what it is that is leading to this dearth of HIV &amp; STI knowledge, we're able to come up with plans to get this information out to those groups because the current techniques clearly aren't working.It's neither an obvious nor simple area of research, despite what some in this thread will say.
$400k to potentially save quite a few lives (or protect the quality of many lives) is a bargain.
If you're a wretched excuse for a human being and you think that people who get HIV "deserve" it, you probably don't care that a lifetime of treatment for a single case of HIV infection will run around $400-500k (minimum) so this kind of research is also cost effective from that standpoint.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434471</id>
	<title>Re:Another political cheap shot at public expense</title>
	<author>mattwarden</author>
	<datestamp>1245689880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think it's a good idea, then why don't you and like-minded individuals pay for the research? Or perhaps you have a reason why this must be funded by federal tax dollars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think it 's a good idea , then why do n't you and like-minded individuals pay for the research ?
Or perhaps you have a reason why this must be funded by federal tax dollars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think it's a good idea, then why don't you and like-minded individuals pay for the research?
Or perhaps you have a reason why this must be funded by federal tax dollars?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432065</id>
	<title>am i the only one....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245676980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that has complaints about the false sense of security that condoms offer?<br>how many of us have experienced condoms breaking during intercourse?  what about when they start rolling back just a little, and then come off during intercourse?</p><p>alternatively, i have also tried a few different types of condoms, and the ones that i thought were best were the sheepskin type and a micro-thin type.  in all seriousness, they were not noticeable... but i still don't trust them enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that has complaints about the false sense of security that condoms offer ? how many of us have experienced condoms breaking during intercourse ?
what about when they start rolling back just a little , and then come off during intercourse ? alternatively , i have also tried a few different types of condoms , and the ones that i thought were best were the sheepskin type and a micro-thin type .
in all seriousness , they were not noticeable... but i still do n't trust them enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that has complaints about the false sense of security that condoms offer?how many of us have experienced condoms breaking during intercourse?
what about when they start rolling back just a little, and then come off during intercourse?alternatively, i have also tried a few different types of condoms, and the ones that i thought were best were the sheepskin type and a micro-thin type.
in all seriousness, they were not noticeable... but i still don't trust them enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430803</id>
	<title>Welcome to slashdot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boy are you barking up the wrong tree!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boy are you barking up the wrong tree !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boy are you barking up the wrong tree!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28446303</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>loxosceles</author>
	<datestamp>1245755700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[citation needed]</p><p>The <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm" title="cdc.gov">CDC's circumcision factsheet</a> [cdc.gov] cites studies showing increased transmission of HIV and syphilis in uncircumcised males.  It cites a lot of studies on HIV.</p><p>For HIV, scientists have shown increased viral uptake using foreskin tissue in the lab.  It's hard to get less biased evidence than that.</p><p>I would think that most STDs should be transmitted less frequently to circumcised males, even if only slightly, because there's less surface area to be transmitted to.  Any conclusions otherwise are immediately suspect for that reason alone.  STDs like herpes and HPV that can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact, not requiring mucus membrane contact, obviously won't have as dramatic a difference in transmission rates as HIV, but I would expect there still to be some difference.</p><p>And no, I'm not in favor of circumcision at birth.  I think parents and sons should have a reasonable discussion about it when sons are old enough to understand the issue and decide for themselves.  Unfortunately, the parents most likely to circumcise their children at birth are also least likely to have any sort of discussion with their boys about sex, beyond "don't have it."  Those boys are also the most likely to be having unprotected sex.  Banning circumcision at birth is likely to result in (inept) back-alley circumcisions and more STDs among teens from conservative families who didn't opt for back-alley circumcisions, because their parents are too fucking inept and repressed to have honest conversations with their kids about sex and STDs even if it might save their kids' lives.</p><p>Also, fuck religion. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlapping\_magisteria" title="wikipedia.org">NOMA</a> [wikipedia.org] my ass.  STDs, particularly in Africa, are a case study for how religion can affect people's health in very real and scientifically quantifiable ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ citation needed ] The CDC 's circumcision factsheet [ cdc.gov ] cites studies showing increased transmission of HIV and syphilis in uncircumcised males .
It cites a lot of studies on HIV.For HIV , scientists have shown increased viral uptake using foreskin tissue in the lab .
It 's hard to get less biased evidence than that.I would think that most STDs should be transmitted less frequently to circumcised males , even if only slightly , because there 's less surface area to be transmitted to .
Any conclusions otherwise are immediately suspect for that reason alone .
STDs like herpes and HPV that can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact , not requiring mucus membrane contact , obviously wo n't have as dramatic a difference in transmission rates as HIV , but I would expect there still to be some difference.And no , I 'm not in favor of circumcision at birth .
I think parents and sons should have a reasonable discussion about it when sons are old enough to understand the issue and decide for themselves .
Unfortunately , the parents most likely to circumcise their children at birth are also least likely to have any sort of discussion with their boys about sex , beyond " do n't have it .
" Those boys are also the most likely to be having unprotected sex .
Banning circumcision at birth is likely to result in ( inept ) back-alley circumcisions and more STDs among teens from conservative families who did n't opt for back-alley circumcisions , because their parents are too fucking inept and repressed to have honest conversations with their kids about sex and STDs even if it might save their kids ' lives.Also , fuck religion .
NOMA [ wikipedia.org ] my ass .
STDs , particularly in Africa , are a case study for how religion can affect people 's health in very real and scientifically quantifiable ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[citation needed]The CDC's circumcision factsheet [cdc.gov] cites studies showing increased transmission of HIV and syphilis in uncircumcised males.
It cites a lot of studies on HIV.For HIV, scientists have shown increased viral uptake using foreskin tissue in the lab.
It's hard to get less biased evidence than that.I would think that most STDs should be transmitted less frequently to circumcised males, even if only slightly, because there's less surface area to be transmitted to.
Any conclusions otherwise are immediately suspect for that reason alone.
STDs like herpes and HPV that can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact, not requiring mucus membrane contact, obviously won't have as dramatic a difference in transmission rates as HIV, but I would expect there still to be some difference.And no, I'm not in favor of circumcision at birth.
I think parents and sons should have a reasonable discussion about it when sons are old enough to understand the issue and decide for themselves.
Unfortunately, the parents most likely to circumcise their children at birth are also least likely to have any sort of discussion with their boys about sex, beyond "don't have it.
"  Those boys are also the most likely to be having unprotected sex.
Banning circumcision at birth is likely to result in (inept) back-alley circumcisions and more STDs among teens from conservative families who didn't opt for back-alley circumcisions, because their parents are too fucking inept and repressed to have honest conversations with their kids about sex and STDs even if it might save their kids' lives.Also, fuck religion.
NOMA [wikipedia.org] my ass.
STDs, particularly in Africa, are a case study for how religion can affect people's health in very real and scientifically quantifiable ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435609</id>
	<title>Darwin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are driven to do stuff because of the make up of our brain. Natural selection inevitably dictates that those practices which tend to result in more offspring will be favoured over those that do not.</p><p>That's why men who want to f*** women without having an intervening layer of latex are more common that those who prefer it.Those that use them, usually do so under sufferance. It's not a rational decision to attain an end; it isn't an illness; it's just something which is hard wired into the brain.</p><p>For what it's worth, that's also why homosexuals are a minority (meaning no judgement there), It's also why men who are attracted to old age pensioners are few in number, why paedophiles do not dominate society and so on. Those practices just don't result in offspring. The latter also happens to provoke a strong reaction from parents - another drive hard coded into our brains, which serves to maximise the likelihood that our children will survive.</p><p>There is no dysfunction; that's just a bit of jargon used by members of the majority persuasion to make their rivals outcasts - another natural tendency driven by natural selection.</p><p>If you ever wonder why you like something or dislike something or why you favour a political party even, just think about what it means for your offspring and you'll likely as not understand what is driving you. You don't have any choice in it.</p><p>One last point. Begin a slave to our drives is not to say that we have no control over them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are driven to do stuff because of the make up of our brain .
Natural selection inevitably dictates that those practices which tend to result in more offspring will be favoured over those that do not.That 's why men who want to f * * * women without having an intervening layer of latex are more common that those who prefer it.Those that use them , usually do so under sufferance .
It 's not a rational decision to attain an end ; it is n't an illness ; it 's just something which is hard wired into the brain.For what it 's worth , that 's also why homosexuals are a minority ( meaning no judgement there ) , It 's also why men who are attracted to old age pensioners are few in number , why paedophiles do not dominate society and so on .
Those practices just do n't result in offspring .
The latter also happens to provoke a strong reaction from parents - another drive hard coded into our brains , which serves to maximise the likelihood that our children will survive.There is no dysfunction ; that 's just a bit of jargon used by members of the majority persuasion to make their rivals outcasts - another natural tendency driven by natural selection.If you ever wonder why you like something or dislike something or why you favour a political party even , just think about what it means for your offspring and you 'll likely as not understand what is driving you .
You do n't have any choice in it.One last point .
Begin a slave to our drives is not to say that we have no control over them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are driven to do stuff because of the make up of our brain.
Natural selection inevitably dictates that those practices which tend to result in more offspring will be favoured over those that do not.That's why men who want to f*** women without having an intervening layer of latex are more common that those who prefer it.Those that use them, usually do so under sufferance.
It's not a rational decision to attain an end; it isn't an illness; it's just something which is hard wired into the brain.For what it's worth, that's also why homosexuals are a minority (meaning no judgement there), It's also why men who are attracted to old age pensioners are few in number, why paedophiles do not dominate society and so on.
Those practices just don't result in offspring.
The latter also happens to provoke a strong reaction from parents - another drive hard coded into our brains, which serves to maximise the likelihood that our children will survive.There is no dysfunction; that's just a bit of jargon used by members of the majority persuasion to make their rivals outcasts - another natural tendency driven by natural selection.If you ever wonder why you like something or dislike something or why you favour a political party even, just think about what it means for your offspring and you'll likely as not understand what is driving you.
You don't have any choice in it.One last point.
Begin a slave to our drives is not to say that we have no control over them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436593</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245755400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair though, I find it pretty damn unlikely that any uncircumcised guys are aware what having a circumcised penis is like.</p><p>Your argument cuts both ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair though , I find it pretty damn unlikely that any uncircumcised guys are aware what having a circumcised penis is like.Your argument cuts both ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair though, I find it pretty damn unlikely that any uncircumcised guys are aware what having a circumcised penis is like.Your argument cuts both ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437833</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1245766680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy.</p> </div><p>Sperm come out before ejaculation. So I was thinking you're probably impotent or at least have poor sperm motility. Turns out that studies suggest ( eg <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/reprints/Contraception79-407-410.pdf" title="guttmacher.org">http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/reprints/Contraception79-407-410.pdf</a> [guttmacher.org] from this month, June 2009; see <a href="http://menstrualpoetry.com/withdrawal-viable-method-contraception" title="menstrualpoetry.com">http://menstrualpoetry.com/withdrawal-viable-method-contraception</a> [menstrualpoetry.com] for a summary) that couples practising withdrawal have a 4\% chance of pregnancy in a year vs. a 2\% chance with a condom<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... provided you do it perfectly! If you slip up the chances rise to 18\% (vs. 17\% with a condom). So you're only twice as likely to get pregnant using withdrawal perfectly as opposed to a condom. Ignoring your risks for STD/STIs of course.</p><p>This could mean that the general population have potency problems too. Other studies show a general decline in sperm quality.</p><p>My instinct is to blame oestrogen like compounds in personally grooming products (shampoos, etc.).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy .
Sperm come out before ejaculation .
So I was thinking you 're probably impotent or at least have poor sperm motility .
Turns out that studies suggest ( eg http : //www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/reprints/Contraception79-407-410.pdf [ guttmacher.org ] from this month , June 2009 ; see http : //menstrualpoetry.com/withdrawal-viable-method-contraception [ menstrualpoetry.com ] for a summary ) that couples practising withdrawal have a 4 \ % chance of pregnancy in a year vs. a 2 \ % chance with a condom ... provided you do it perfectly !
If you slip up the chances rise to 18 \ % ( vs. 17 \ % with a condom ) .
So you 're only twice as likely to get pregnant using withdrawal perfectly as opposed to a condom .
Ignoring your risks for STD/STIs of course.This could mean that the general population have potency problems too .
Other studies show a general decline in sperm quality.My instinct is to blame oestrogen like compounds in personally grooming products ( shampoos , etc .
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We went out for three years and contraception was only used for a total of about 6 months of that with no pregnancy.
Sperm come out before ejaculation.
So I was thinking you're probably impotent or at least have poor sperm motility.
Turns out that studies suggest ( eg http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/reprints/Contraception79-407-410.pdf [guttmacher.org] from this month, June 2009; see http://menstrualpoetry.com/withdrawal-viable-method-contraception [menstrualpoetry.com] for a summary) that couples practising withdrawal have a 4\% chance of pregnancy in a year vs. a 2\% chance with a condom ... provided you do it perfectly!
If you slip up the chances rise to 18\% (vs. 17\% with a condom).
So you're only twice as likely to get pregnant using withdrawal perfectly as opposed to a condom.
Ignoring your risks for STD/STIs of course.This could mean that the general population have potency problems too.
Other studies show a general decline in sperm quality.My instinct is to blame oestrogen like compounds in personally grooming products (shampoos, etc.
).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450105</id>
	<title>My Gripes</title>
	<author>longbot</author>
	<datestamp>1245876720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These are just my gripes: they're expensive (five dollars a dozen?!) and always expire before I get to use them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These are just my gripes : they 're expensive ( five dollars a dozen ? !
) and always expire before I get to use them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are just my gripes: they're expensive (five dollars a dozen?!
) and always expire before I get to use them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434851</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1245693060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most intelligent women would have difficulty in trusting a man to be honest about being on hormonal birth control - newsflash, guys lie to get sex. At the end of the day, women are the ones left holding the bag if an unplanned sexual encounter results in a pregnancy. Cue comments about child support payments, but most women, given the choice, wouldn't plan to be a single parent, and plenty of guys avoid child support through whatever means.</p><p>While condoms are a form of birth control, even women on hormonal birth control would ask their partner to use a condom if they have any doubts about STDs. The love glove is here to stay until all STDs are eliminated, or an alternative barrier product is invented.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most intelligent women would have difficulty in trusting a man to be honest about being on hormonal birth control - newsflash , guys lie to get sex .
At the end of the day , women are the ones left holding the bag if an unplanned sexual encounter results in a pregnancy .
Cue comments about child support payments , but most women , given the choice , would n't plan to be a single parent , and plenty of guys avoid child support through whatever means.While condoms are a form of birth control , even women on hormonal birth control would ask their partner to use a condom if they have any doubts about STDs .
The love glove is here to stay until all STDs are eliminated , or an alternative barrier product is invented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most intelligent women would have difficulty in trusting a man to be honest about being on hormonal birth control - newsflash, guys lie to get sex.
At the end of the day, women are the ones left holding the bag if an unplanned sexual encounter results in a pregnancy.
Cue comments about child support payments, but most women, given the choice, wouldn't plan to be a single parent, and plenty of guys avoid child support through whatever means.While condoms are a form of birth control, even women on hormonal birth control would ask their partner to use a condom if they have any doubts about STDs.
The love glove is here to stay until all STDs are eliminated, or an alternative barrier product is invented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433725</id>
	<title>I'd rather remain celibate than use  a condom</title>
	<author>angevin</author>
	<datestamp>1245685560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A wise man does not make chasing after pleasure a priority but makes avoiding pain one. I view sex from a utilitarian perspective a practical Aristotelianism. Sex is to reproduce from a evolutionary and biological point of view therefore having sex with a condom is trivial and hedonism. I'm pretty anti-sensual in general. Don't want kids or STDs ? Simply don't have sex instead of using a condom. Using a condom just isn't as pleasurable so the only reason I can see for doing it is perhaps to get to an intimidate level with a female partner but players that go around sleeping with lots of people with condoms and have no significant relationships with their partners make no sense to me. So I choose celibacy over sex with a condom (yes I really can practice self-restraint even with a beautiful woman).</htmltext>
<tokenext>A wise man does not make chasing after pleasure a priority but makes avoiding pain one .
I view sex from a utilitarian perspective a practical Aristotelianism .
Sex is to reproduce from a evolutionary and biological point of view therefore having sex with a condom is trivial and hedonism .
I 'm pretty anti-sensual in general .
Do n't want kids or STDs ?
Simply do n't have sex instead of using a condom .
Using a condom just is n't as pleasurable so the only reason I can see for doing it is perhaps to get to an intimidate level with a female partner but players that go around sleeping with lots of people with condoms and have no significant relationships with their partners make no sense to me .
So I choose celibacy over sex with a condom ( yes I really can practice self-restraint even with a beautiful woman ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A wise man does not make chasing after pleasure a priority but makes avoiding pain one.
I view sex from a utilitarian perspective a practical Aristotelianism.
Sex is to reproduce from a evolutionary and biological point of view therefore having sex with a condom is trivial and hedonism.
I'm pretty anti-sensual in general.
Don't want kids or STDs ?
Simply don't have sex instead of using a condom.
Using a condom just isn't as pleasurable so the only reason I can see for doing it is perhaps to get to an intimidate level with a female partner but players that go around sleeping with lots of people with condoms and have no significant relationships with their partners make no sense to me.
So I choose celibacy over sex with a condom (yes I really can practice self-restraint even with a beautiful woman).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436523</id>
	<title>Re:I research condom use in teens...</title>
	<author>squoozer</author>
	<datestamp>1245754260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twenty steps to proper condom usage? I think I know where the problem might be. If you want widespread adoption you have got to get that down to at most three or four clear steps with cartoon drawings and a catchy slogan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twenty steps to proper condom usage ?
I think I know where the problem might be .
If you want widespread adoption you have got to get that down to at most three or four clear steps with cartoon drawings and a catchy slogan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twenty steps to proper condom usage?
I think I know where the problem might be.
If you want widespread adoption you have got to get that down to at most three or four clear steps with cartoon drawings and a catchy slogan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432609</id>
	<title>Re:Greater Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245679500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah till they bring in the filthy prostitute to see your reaction when they say "Do her without." I'll bet you end that little experiment quickly. Unless you're into filthy prostitutes, then by all means, bang away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah till they bring in the filthy prostitute to see your reaction when they say " Do her without .
" I 'll bet you end that little experiment quickly .
Unless you 're into filthy prostitutes , then by all means , bang away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah till they bring in the filthy prostitute to see your reaction when they say "Do her without.
" I'll bet you end that little experiment quickly.
Unless you're into filthy prostitutes, then by all means, bang away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432331</id>
	<title>Too Small</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went through about 8 years of unprotected sex before I started using condoms.<br>It always stressed me out a ton, and I tried to use them but I would lose my erection in less than 10 seconds every time..</p><p>So it was either no sex AT ALL, EVER. Or unprotected sex.<br>I talked about that problem, and asked for help, but all I got was a bunch of bullshit answers.<br>Try having the girl put the condom on.. etc lame stuff that like that, which had absolutely nothing to do with the issue.</p><p>The issue was that the condoms were too small (circumference), and they were cutting off my circulation!<br>When I moved up to the larger sized condoms, suddenly everything worked for me.</p><p>So I'd like to give a big f-you to our education system for failing me and exposing me to years of risk needlessly.<br>I went for help with this issue multiple times and nobody every told me the real problem.</p><p>It doesn't feel the same as raw - but my god condoms are a lot better now that they're the right size.<br>And no - this is not some "my penis is big" internet tough guy lame speech.</p><p>Unprotected sex is a pretty serious health risk, and I can't be the only guy that had this problem</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went through about 8 years of unprotected sex before I started using condoms.It always stressed me out a ton , and I tried to use them but I would lose my erection in less than 10 seconds every time..So it was either no sex AT ALL , EVER .
Or unprotected sex.I talked about that problem , and asked for help , but all I got was a bunch of bullshit answers.Try having the girl put the condom on.. etc lame stuff that like that , which had absolutely nothing to do with the issue.The issue was that the condoms were too small ( circumference ) , and they were cutting off my circulation ! When I moved up to the larger sized condoms , suddenly everything worked for me.So I 'd like to give a big f-you to our education system for failing me and exposing me to years of risk needlessly.I went for help with this issue multiple times and nobody every told me the real problem.It does n't feel the same as raw - but my god condoms are a lot better now that they 're the right size.And no - this is not some " my penis is big " internet tough guy lame speech.Unprotected sex is a pretty serious health risk , and I ca n't be the only guy that had this problem</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went through about 8 years of unprotected sex before I started using condoms.It always stressed me out a ton, and I tried to use them but I would lose my erection in less than 10 seconds every time..So it was either no sex AT ALL, EVER.
Or unprotected sex.I talked about that problem, and asked for help, but all I got was a bunch of bullshit answers.Try having the girl put the condom on.. etc lame stuff that like that, which had absolutely nothing to do with the issue.The issue was that the condoms were too small (circumference), and they were cutting off my circulation!When I moved up to the larger sized condoms, suddenly everything worked for me.So I'd like to give a big f-you to our education system for failing me and exposing me to years of risk needlessly.I went for help with this issue multiple times and nobody every told me the real problem.It doesn't feel the same as raw - but my god condoms are a lot better now that they're the right size.And no - this is not some "my penis is big" internet tough guy lame speech.Unprotected sex is a pretty serious health risk, and I can't be the only guy that had this problem</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433749</id>
	<title>Could be useful</title>
	<author>LarrySDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1245685680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's far from clear why men don't like to wear condoms and women don't like for men to wear condoms. The former is probably more likely, but the latter isn't unheard of. Sensitivity issues enter in, but there is certainly a psychological issue involved as well. You aren't skin on skin, not really. With the adult products now, some situations I'm not even sure a lot of people could pass a double-blind. However, there is also correct use, being able to get people to use it correctly (both for effectiveness and for not messing it up). You won't be in your right mind at the time. Or, at least that's what we're all hoping you won't be. So it kind of matters how much is what here and you won't get answers out of humans (yes, I'm one) because it doesn't work like that.

Take out ten edge cases of people who would have otherwise not used rubber and you've easily paid for yourself (in actual cash, they have to be raised/treated). Not sure if that's the states job, but at least it's pretty likely to not be a waste. If, oddly, it produces nothing then at least we know a little more about the matter which would be handy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's far from clear why men do n't like to wear condoms and women do n't like for men to wear condoms .
The former is probably more likely , but the latter is n't unheard of .
Sensitivity issues enter in , but there is certainly a psychological issue involved as well .
You are n't skin on skin , not really .
With the adult products now , some situations I 'm not even sure a lot of people could pass a double-blind .
However , there is also correct use , being able to get people to use it correctly ( both for effectiveness and for not messing it up ) .
You wo n't be in your right mind at the time .
Or , at least that 's what we 're all hoping you wo n't be .
So it kind of matters how much is what here and you wo n't get answers out of humans ( yes , I 'm one ) because it does n't work like that .
Take out ten edge cases of people who would have otherwise not used rubber and you 've easily paid for yourself ( in actual cash , they have to be raised/treated ) .
Not sure if that 's the states job , but at least it 's pretty likely to not be a waste .
If , oddly , it produces nothing then at least we know a little more about the matter which would be handy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's far from clear why men don't like to wear condoms and women don't like for men to wear condoms.
The former is probably more likely, but the latter isn't unheard of.
Sensitivity issues enter in, but there is certainly a psychological issue involved as well.
You aren't skin on skin, not really.
With the adult products now, some situations I'm not even sure a lot of people could pass a double-blind.
However, there is also correct use, being able to get people to use it correctly (both for effectiveness and for not messing it up).
You won't be in your right mind at the time.
Or, at least that's what we're all hoping you won't be.
So it kind of matters how much is what here and you won't get answers out of humans (yes, I'm one) because it doesn't work like that.
Take out ten edge cases of people who would have otherwise not used rubber and you've easily paid for yourself (in actual cash, they have to be raised/treated).
Not sure if that's the states job, but at least it's pretty likely to not be a waste.
If, oddly, it produces nothing then at least we know a little more about the matter which would be handy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433965</id>
	<title>True Lies</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1245687060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course Fox News is reporting things even across the board, rather than engaging in yellow journalism. Their reputation is such that they don't need to research the grant itself or the ongoing project it stems from.</p><p>NIH has been funding AIDS related research for over 25 years. This includes behavioral research regarding risky behaviors such as unprotected sex. That's going to produce results long before any research into vaccines or cures.</p><p>The first question that comes to mind is how many saved lives would be worth US$432,500? The second is how much is the Kinsey Institute's time worth, keeping in mind it's going to pay the salaries of researchers, technicians and assistants for the duration? Along with that, consider that any research done under any academic umbrella ends up paying a significant cut off the top to the university. The amount varies, but I've had one university try to take 70\% off the top.</p><p>Anyone that thinks they could do such things better for less are free to submit proposals to NIH. They make it very clear how to go about it. In order to be able to judge whether the amount quoted is unreasonable one would have to be able to evaluate such a proposal in its own terms, if not be qualified to put one together. I find it hard to believe that the person that Fox News calls "government watchdogs" (pluralizing being a perfectly allowable journalistic technique) is qualified to evaluate the text of the grant proposal to point out just what parts of it are wasteful, what parts are just overpriced, and what parts are reasonable, rather than pointing at the whole thing without reading any of it and making a sweeping claim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course Fox News is reporting things even across the board , rather than engaging in yellow journalism .
Their reputation is such that they do n't need to research the grant itself or the ongoing project it stems from.NIH has been funding AIDS related research for over 25 years .
This includes behavioral research regarding risky behaviors such as unprotected sex .
That 's going to produce results long before any research into vaccines or cures.The first question that comes to mind is how many saved lives would be worth US $ 432,500 ?
The second is how much is the Kinsey Institute 's time worth , keeping in mind it 's going to pay the salaries of researchers , technicians and assistants for the duration ?
Along with that , consider that any research done under any academic umbrella ends up paying a significant cut off the top to the university .
The amount varies , but I 've had one university try to take 70 \ % off the top.Anyone that thinks they could do such things better for less are free to submit proposals to NIH .
They make it very clear how to go about it .
In order to be able to judge whether the amount quoted is unreasonable one would have to be able to evaluate such a proposal in its own terms , if not be qualified to put one together .
I find it hard to believe that the person that Fox News calls " government watchdogs " ( pluralizing being a perfectly allowable journalistic technique ) is qualified to evaluate the text of the grant proposal to point out just what parts of it are wasteful , what parts are just overpriced , and what parts are reasonable , rather than pointing at the whole thing without reading any of it and making a sweeping claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course Fox News is reporting things even across the board, rather than engaging in yellow journalism.
Their reputation is such that they don't need to research the grant itself or the ongoing project it stems from.NIH has been funding AIDS related research for over 25 years.
This includes behavioral research regarding risky behaviors such as unprotected sex.
That's going to produce results long before any research into vaccines or cures.The first question that comes to mind is how many saved lives would be worth US$432,500?
The second is how much is the Kinsey Institute's time worth, keeping in mind it's going to pay the salaries of researchers, technicians and assistants for the duration?
Along with that, consider that any research done under any academic umbrella ends up paying a significant cut off the top to the university.
The amount varies, but I've had one university try to take 70\% off the top.Anyone that thinks they could do such things better for less are free to submit proposals to NIH.
They make it very clear how to go about it.
In order to be able to judge whether the amount quoted is unreasonable one would have to be able to evaluate such a proposal in its own terms, if not be qualified to put one together.
I find it hard to believe that the person that Fox News calls "government watchdogs" (pluralizing being a perfectly allowable journalistic technique) is qualified to evaluate the text of the grant proposal to point out just what parts of it are wasteful, what parts are just overpriced, and what parts are reasonable, rather than pointing at the whole thing without reading any of it and making a sweeping claim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434377</id>
	<title>A cheap analogy would be.... cheaper</title>
	<author>dilvish\_the\_damned</author>
	<datestamp>1245689280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rain-slicker in a massage parlor. ( $100,000 )<br>"I thought you would have one" ( $50,000 )<br>Barrier to entry ( $200,000 )<br>"but there are two of you" ( $50,000 )<br>Short sheeted. ( $100,000 )</p><p>( hooker expenses needed to derive these results: $23,500 ).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rain-slicker in a massage parlor .
( $ 100,000 ) " I thought you would have one " ( $ 50,000 ) Barrier to entry ( $ 200,000 ) " but there are two of you " ( $ 50,000 ) Short sheeted .
( $ 100,000 ) ( hooker expenses needed to derive these results : $ 23,500 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rain-slicker in a massage parlor.
( $100,000 )"I thought you would have one" ( $50,000 )Barrier to entry ( $200,000 )"but there are two of you" ( $50,000 )Short sheeted.
( $100,000 )( hooker expenses needed to derive these results: $23,500 ).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436363</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245752400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Don't bend for a friend or you'll get it in the end.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't bend for a friend or you 'll get it in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't bend for a friend or you'll get it in the end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435763</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245788340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>clearly you've never heard of the fleshlight</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>clearly you 've never heard of the fleshlight</tokentext>
<sentencetext>clearly you've never heard of the fleshlight</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432753</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245680160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hardest to reverse too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardest to reverse too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardest to reverse too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431273</id>
	<title>No...</title>
	<author>RichardJenkins</author>
	<datestamp>1245673680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two reasons:

  1. I'm too drunk to know better
  2. I'm usually by myself</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two reasons : 1 .
I 'm too drunk to know better 2 .
I 'm usually by myself</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two reasons:

  1.
I'm too drunk to know better
  2.
I'm usually by myself</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437547</id>
	<title>Only 400 of them...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1245765240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were able to test about only 400 times the reason why they do not like condoms while fornicating....<br>unless they went in further then the price drops to about 100$ per...making it more like 4000 times....<br>Still, not enough times spent because you have a 1 in 5000 chance of catching something without wearing a condom...<br>or so the commercial goes....!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were able to test about only 400 times the reason why they do not like condoms while fornicating....unless they went in further then the price drops to about 100 $ per...making it more like 4000 times....Still , not enough times spent because you have a 1 in 5000 chance of catching something without wearing a condom...or so the commercial goes.... !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were able to test about only 400 times the reason why they do not like condoms while fornicating....unless they went in further then the price drops to about 100$ per...making it more like 4000 times....Still, not enough times spent because you have a 1 in 5000 chance of catching something without wearing a condom...or so the commercial goes....!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437945</id>
	<title>$423,000 for Biphenyl Cancer Penis Answer?</title>
	<author>ImitationEnergy</author>
	<datestamp>1245767460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Solution to article =&gt; <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/22/1616239" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/22/1616239</a> [slashdot.org] i.e. <b>Why don't you real men like condoms?</b> Seeing as how I prefer earning my Gravity Wheel invention seed money (last pgh) and not gov't handout money extorted from your paychecks by Hussein Obama just send the $4.23-$423,000.00 consultant fee for solving these pressing sexual dysfunction issues to Member One Federal Credit Union #162895 in Roanoke Virginia please =&gt; the answer to this "<b>Why men don't like condoms?</b>" question is that men sense they are being <b>poisoned by the biphenyl baby bottle plastic poison contained in rubber condoms.</b> The male brain has a high flow of blood <b>+</b> the male penis having also the high flow of blood <b>equals</b> <br> <br> <b>THE BRAIN DETECTS INCOMING POISON FROM THE CONDOM ENCLOSED PENIS</b> <br> <br> <b>FOLLOWING PLACEMENT &amp; SUBSEQUENT INTENSE HOT HEAVY-SEX-HEAT <br> <br>AND SWEAT-RELEASED CONDOM CHEMICAL POISON INTO BRAIN-BOUND BLOOD<br> <br>RESPONSIBLE FOR AMERICAN MEN NEEDING VIAGRA &amp; CIALIS TO RECOVER LOST PENIS FUNCTION.</b> <br> <br>The human brain <br>#1 recognizes the condom-released chemical poison coming its way &amp; <br>#2 makes the man feel uncomfortable using condoms because <br>#3 MALES ARE BEING POISON-CASTRATED WITH <b>CONDOM-DELIVERED BIPHENYL PLASTIC</b> <br> <br>developed primarily to placate women ditto vasectomies.<br> <br>This solution will be added to my web sites for the record how I solved the <b>worldwide male poisoning-by-condom by our present male-is-only-a-sperm donor despising society</b> but no, Woodrow Riley isn't so brain dead stupid he thinks a "consultant fee" will be deposited in my bank account above. No one else does it. I could however stop receiving monthly disability checks with enough small donations of thanks were received so I could buy a tractor-trailer rig and get back to work or get to work completing the design of my <b>Gravity Wheel</b> that will power each person's home by a gravity-run generator =&gt; <a href="http://www.newpath4.com/firefox\_best\_links.htm" title="newpath4.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newpath4.com/firefox\_best\_links.htm</a> [newpath4.com]. PayPal any help you feel motivated to send for me alerting you <b>YOUR RUBBER IS KILLING YOU</b> to riley101 at cox dot net. See also <a href="http://tinyurl.com/GravityWheelOne" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/GravityWheelOne</a> [tinyurl.com] and, thanks for the help; <b>it will come back to you many times over and likely your children,<br> <br>especially your MALE children who should be <br> <br>spared chemicals doused on their penis.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solution to article = &gt; http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/06/22/1616239 [ slashdot.org ] i.e .
Why do n't you real men like condoms ?
Seeing as how I prefer earning my Gravity Wheel invention seed money ( last pgh ) and not gov't handout money extorted from your paychecks by Hussein Obama just send the $ 4.23- $ 423,000.00 consultant fee for solving these pressing sexual dysfunction issues to Member One Federal Credit Union # 162895 in Roanoke Virginia please = &gt; the answer to this " Why men do n't like condoms ?
" question is that men sense they are being poisoned by the biphenyl baby bottle plastic poison contained in rubber condoms .
The male brain has a high flow of blood + the male penis having also the high flow of blood equals THE BRAIN DETECTS INCOMING POISON FROM THE CONDOM ENCLOSED PENIS FOLLOWING PLACEMENT &amp; SUBSEQUENT INTENSE HOT HEAVY-SEX-HEAT AND SWEAT-RELEASED CONDOM CHEMICAL POISON INTO BRAIN-BOUND BLOOD RESPONSIBLE FOR AMERICAN MEN NEEDING VIAGRA &amp; CIALIS TO RECOVER LOST PENIS FUNCTION .
The human brain # 1 recognizes the condom-released chemical poison coming its way &amp; # 2 makes the man feel uncomfortable using condoms because # 3 MALES ARE BEING POISON-CASTRATED WITH CONDOM-DELIVERED BIPHENYL PLASTIC developed primarily to placate women ditto vasectomies .
This solution will be added to my web sites for the record how I solved the worldwide male poisoning-by-condom by our present male-is-only-a-sperm donor despising society but no , Woodrow Riley is n't so brain dead stupid he thinks a " consultant fee " will be deposited in my bank account above .
No one else does it .
I could however stop receiving monthly disability checks with enough small donations of thanks were received so I could buy a tractor-trailer rig and get back to work or get to work completing the design of my Gravity Wheel that will power each person 's home by a gravity-run generator = &gt; http : //www.newpath4.com/firefox \ _best \ _links.htm [ newpath4.com ] .
PayPal any help you feel motivated to send for me alerting you YOUR RUBBER IS KILLING YOU to riley101 at cox dot net .
See also http : //tinyurl.com/GravityWheelOne [ tinyurl.com ] and , thanks for the help ; it will come back to you many times over and likely your children , especially your MALE children who should be spared chemicals doused on their penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solution to article =&gt; http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/22/1616239 [slashdot.org] i.e.
Why don't you real men like condoms?
Seeing as how I prefer earning my Gravity Wheel invention seed money (last pgh) and not gov't handout money extorted from your paychecks by Hussein Obama just send the $4.23-$423,000.00 consultant fee for solving these pressing sexual dysfunction issues to Member One Federal Credit Union #162895 in Roanoke Virginia please =&gt; the answer to this "Why men don't like condoms?
" question is that men sense they are being poisoned by the biphenyl baby bottle plastic poison contained in rubber condoms.
The male brain has a high flow of blood + the male penis having also the high flow of blood equals   THE BRAIN DETECTS INCOMING POISON FROM THE CONDOM ENCLOSED PENIS   FOLLOWING PLACEMENT &amp; SUBSEQUENT INTENSE HOT HEAVY-SEX-HEAT  AND SWEAT-RELEASED CONDOM CHEMICAL POISON INTO BRAIN-BOUND BLOOD RESPONSIBLE FOR AMERICAN MEN NEEDING VIAGRA &amp; CIALIS TO RECOVER LOST PENIS FUNCTION.
The human brain #1 recognizes the condom-released chemical poison coming its way &amp; #2 makes the man feel uncomfortable using condoms because #3 MALES ARE BEING POISON-CASTRATED WITH CONDOM-DELIVERED BIPHENYL PLASTIC  developed primarily to placate women ditto vasectomies.
This solution will be added to my web sites for the record how I solved the worldwide male poisoning-by-condom by our present male-is-only-a-sperm donor despising society but no, Woodrow Riley isn't so brain dead stupid he thinks a "consultant fee" will be deposited in my bank account above.
No one else does it.
I could however stop receiving monthly disability checks with enough small donations of thanks were received so I could buy a tractor-trailer rig and get back to work or get to work completing the design of my Gravity Wheel that will power each person's home by a gravity-run generator =&gt; http://www.newpath4.com/firefox\_best\_links.htm [newpath4.com].
PayPal any help you feel motivated to send for me alerting you YOUR RUBBER IS KILLING YOU to riley101 at cox dot net.
See also http://tinyurl.com/GravityWheelOne [tinyurl.com] and, thanks for the help; it will come back to you many times over and likely your children, especially your MALE children who should be  spared chemicals doused on their penis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431679</id>
	<title>Japanese condoms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245675120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought Japan was way ahead of N. America when it came to condom manufacturing.  A lot of the Japanese condoms I've tried (Crown, Kimono, etc.) are very thin, yet strong.  It almost feels like you are wearing nothing at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought Japan was way ahead of N. America when it came to condom manufacturing .
A lot of the Japanese condoms I 've tried ( Crown , Kimono , etc .
) are very thin , yet strong .
It almost feels like you are wearing nothing at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought Japan was way ahead of N. America when it came to condom manufacturing.
A lot of the Japanese condoms I've tried (Crown, Kimono, etc.
) are very thin, yet strong.
It almost feels like you are wearing nothing at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432843</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>yndrd1984</author>
	<datestamp>1245680640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials.</i> </p><p>

That's true, but what about the much larger set of studies that show no correlation between circumcision status and any STD?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials .
That 's true , but what about the much larger set of studies that show no correlation between circumcision status and any STD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials.
That's true, but what about the much larger set of studies that show no correlation between circumcision status and any STD?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431137</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1245673260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no frame of reference for this comparison, but I'm mad I wasted all that money on dinners, movies, flowers, chocolates etc.  A garden hose would have been cheaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no frame of reference for this comparison , but I 'm mad I wasted all that money on dinners , movies , flowers , chocolates etc .
A garden hose would have been cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no frame of reference for this comparison, but I'm mad I wasted all that money on dinners, movies, flowers, chocolates etc.
A garden hose would have been cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432491</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and <b>STDs</b> to worry about. There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9.</p> </div><p>"Although [nonoxynol-9] was at one time widely promoted as a protection against sexually transmitted infections including HIV, subsequent studies have shown that it can in fact increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina."- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonoxynol-9" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] (with reference!)</p><p>So, not much help on the STD level.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No man would rather wear a condom if people did n't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about .
There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms , which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9 .
" Although [ nonoxynol-9 ] was at one time widely promoted as a protection against sexually transmitted infections including HIV , subsequent studies have shown that it can in fact increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina .
" - Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] ( with reference !
) So , not much help on the STD level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.
There should be more R&amp;D funding into liquid condoms, which are basically a spermicidal lube infused with nonoxynol-9.
"Although [nonoxynol-9] was at one time widely promoted as a protection against sexually transmitted infections including HIV, subsequent studies have shown that it can in fact increase the risk of infection by damaging the physical barriers of the rectum or vagina.
"- Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] (with reference!
)So, not much help on the STD level.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433313</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245683040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I concede that the aforementioned benefit exists, but still think circumcising infants is unnecessary surgery. If the individual in question cares for the decreased risk, they can make the decision themselves to go in and get circumcised when they are old enough to give consent to such a medical procedure..</p><p>We wouldn't let parents give their children breast implants without the input of their children, would we? Do we allow parents to give their children tattoos? (I'm actually afraid of the answer to that). When surgery does not have a benefit (and circumcision does not until the individual is sexually active), parents should not be able to select it for their children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I concede that the aforementioned benefit exists , but still think circumcising infants is unnecessary surgery .
If the individual in question cares for the decreased risk , they can make the decision themselves to go in and get circumcised when they are old enough to give consent to such a medical procedure..We would n't let parents give their children breast implants without the input of their children , would we ?
Do we allow parents to give their children tattoos ?
( I 'm actually afraid of the answer to that ) .
When surgery does not have a benefit ( and circumcision does not until the individual is sexually active ) , parents should not be able to select it for their children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I concede that the aforementioned benefit exists, but still think circumcising infants is unnecessary surgery.
If the individual in question cares for the decreased risk, they can make the decision themselves to go in and get circumcised when they are old enough to give consent to such a medical procedure..We wouldn't let parents give their children breast implants without the input of their children, would we?
Do we allow parents to give their children tattoos?
(I'm actually afraid of the answer to that).
When surgery does not have a benefit (and circumcision does not until the individual is sexually active), parents should not be able to select it for their children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435931</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1245790260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Um.  Do you know what 'double blind' means?  [mind wanders...]</p></div><p>It means they put their condoms in the wrong places ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
Do you know what 'double blind ' means ?
[ mind wanders... ] It means they put their condoms in the wrong places ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
Do you know what 'double blind' means?
[mind wanders...]It means they put their condoms in the wrong places ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831</id>
	<title>Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe because it feels like you're trying to mate with a garden hose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe because it feels like you 're trying to mate with a garden hose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe because it feels like you're trying to mate with a garden hose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434557</id>
	<title>Because....</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1245690600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are Jews in the world.<br>There are Buddhists.<br>There are Hindus and Mormons, and then<br>There are those that follow Mohammed, but<br>I've never been one of them.</p><p>I'm a Roman Catholic,<br>And have been since before I was born,<br>And the one thing they say about Catholics is:<br>They'll take you as soon as you're warm.</p><p>You don't have to be a six-footer.<br>You don't have to have a great brain.<br>You don't have to have any clothes on. You're<br>A Catholic the moment Dad came,</p><p>Because</p><p>Every sperm is sacred.<br>Every sperm is great.<br>If a sperm is wasted,<br>God gets quite irate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are Jews in the world.There are Buddhists.There are Hindus and Mormons , and thenThere are those that follow Mohammed , butI 've never been one of them.I 'm a Roman Catholic,And have been since before I was born,And the one thing they say about Catholics is : They 'll take you as soon as you 're warm.You do n't have to be a six-footer.You do n't have to have a great brain.You do n't have to have any clothes on .
You'reA Catholic the moment Dad came,BecauseEvery sperm is sacred.Every sperm is great.If a sperm is wasted,God gets quite irate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are Jews in the world.There are Buddhists.There are Hindus and Mormons, and thenThere are those that follow Mohammed, butI've never been one of them.I'm a Roman Catholic,And have been since before I was born,And the one thing they say about Catholics is:They'll take you as soon as you're warm.You don't have to be a six-footer.You don't have to have a great brain.You don't have to have any clothes on.
You'reA Catholic the moment Dad came,BecauseEvery sperm is sacred.Every sperm is great.If a sperm is wasted,God gets quite irate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433501</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245684300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much. From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.</p></div></blockquote><p>I have semi-phimosis (the foreskin will go back during sex but not all the way), I know a solution to this is to be circumcised but I'm not up for that at all.<br>I'm a 19 year old and have only had sex 20 odd times, not once have I been able to come inside my lady-friend, every time I've had to finish up myself after or go without the orgasmic experience!<br>Anyway I have also never used a condom, I can't imagine how I could possibly get off while wearing one!<br>As I said, I'm not the most experienced in the field, and as such I'm still working at it! Hoping I may be able to later (go without masturbation for a week or so, more of a build up so I'm positively dying for it! Forcing myself to think harder about sexual fantasies, etc) but for now the use of a condom is right out of the question I'm afraid.</p><p>Any advice is more than welcome! Just my two cents<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is true , the good , thin and reliable latex condoms do n't mitigate it by that much .
From what I 've heard , polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity , but it 's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as " guaranteed " as latex condoms.I have semi-phimosis ( the foreskin will go back during sex but not all the way ) , I know a solution to this is to be circumcised but I 'm not up for that at all.I 'm a 19 year old and have only had sex 20 odd times , not once have I been able to come inside my lady-friend , every time I 've had to finish up myself after or go without the orgasmic experience ! Anyway I have also never used a condom , I ca n't imagine how I could possibly get off while wearing one ! As I said , I 'm not the most experienced in the field , and as such I 'm still working at it !
Hoping I may be able to later ( go without masturbation for a week or so , more of a build up so I 'm positively dying for it !
Forcing myself to think harder about sexual fantasies , etc ) but for now the use of a condom is right out of the question I 'm afraid.Any advice is more than welcome !
Just my two cents : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much.
From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.I have semi-phimosis (the foreskin will go back during sex but not all the way), I know a solution to this is to be circumcised but I'm not up for that at all.I'm a 19 year old and have only had sex 20 odd times, not once have I been able to come inside my lady-friend, every time I've had to finish up myself after or go without the orgasmic experience!Anyway I have also never used a condom, I can't imagine how I could possibly get off while wearing one!As I said, I'm not the most experienced in the field, and as such I'm still working at it!
Hoping I may be able to later (go without masturbation for a week or so, more of a build up so I'm positively dying for it!
Forcing myself to think harder about sexual fantasies, etc) but for now the use of a condom is right out of the question I'm afraid.Any advice is more than welcome!
Just my two cents :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438083</id>
	<title>Re:Cheaper than treating AIDS for 1 1/2 people</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1245768240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $400,000 and can run as high as $648,000"</p><p>Of course, one could assert that the government has no business rescuing people from their OWN SHITTY LIFE CHOICES (then the lifetime cost would be $0), but that would apparently be too radical for 2009.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $ 400,000 and can run as high as $ 648,000 " Of course , one could assert that the government has no business rescuing people from their OWN SHITTY LIFE CHOICES ( then the lifetime cost would be $ 0 ) , but that would apparently be too radical for 2009. : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the lifetime cost of treating an HIV-positive person exceeds $400,000 and can run as high as $648,000"Of course, one could assert that the government has no business rescuing people from their OWN SHITTY LIFE CHOICES (then the lifetime cost would be $0), but that would apparently be too radical for 2009. :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432361</id>
	<title>Study procedure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hold plastic bag over the head of the NIH director until he hands over the $400K.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hold plastic bag over the head of the NIH director until he hands over the $ 400K .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hold plastic bag over the head of the NIH director until he hands over the $400K.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383</id>
	<title>Another political cheap shot at public expense</title>
	<author>tgibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1245673980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew when I saw this news item that it would turn out to be dishonest. There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh"). So I suspected immediately that this isn't actually what the study is about, and it's just a matter of a politician or lobbyist phrasing it this way to try to score a cheap shot at the expense of the public welfare. Because, of course, there is a huge public benefit to condoms: The reduce unwanted pregnancies, which often end up imposing a substantial financial and social burden on the public. And they reduce the spread of diseases that also end up costing the public money, not to mention placing those dear to us in peril--sometimes mortal peril.</p><p>And while men don't much like condoms, there are many reasons for them to want to use them--to protect themselves against disease, to protect themselves against unwanted financial obligations, and even out of consideration for their partner's well-being.</p><p>So any change that would shift that balance a bit to encourage correct usage of condoms, even by a small amount, could provide a huge public benefit.</p><p>But of course, there are always going to be some selfish people who don't care about protecting other people's health, or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies. All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public, well, that's not their problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew when I saw this news item that it would turn out to be dishonest .
There is one very obvious reason why men do n't like to wear condoms ( " it does n't feel as good...duh " ) .
So I suspected immediately that this is n't actually what the study is about , and it 's just a matter of a politician or lobbyist phrasing it this way to try to score a cheap shot at the expense of the public welfare .
Because , of course , there is a huge public benefit to condoms : The reduce unwanted pregnancies , which often end up imposing a substantial financial and social burden on the public .
And they reduce the spread of diseases that also end up costing the public money , not to mention placing those dear to us in peril--sometimes mortal peril.And while men do n't much like condoms , there are many reasons for them to want to use them--to protect themselves against disease , to protect themselves against unwanted financial obligations , and even out of consideration for their partner 's well-being.So any change that would shift that balance a bit to encourage correct usage of condoms , even by a small amount , could provide a huge public benefit.But of course , there are always going to be some selfish people who do n't care about protecting other people 's health , or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies .
All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public , well , that 's not their problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew when I saw this news item that it would turn out to be dishonest.
There is one very obvious reason why men don't like to wear condoms ("it doesn't feel as good...duh").
So I suspected immediately that this isn't actually what the study is about, and it's just a matter of a politician or lobbyist phrasing it this way to try to score a cheap shot at the expense of the public welfare.
Because, of course, there is a huge public benefit to condoms: The reduce unwanted pregnancies, which often end up imposing a substantial financial and social burden on the public.
And they reduce the spread of diseases that also end up costing the public money, not to mention placing those dear to us in peril--sometimes mortal peril.And while men don't much like condoms, there are many reasons for them to want to use them--to protect themselves against disease, to protect themselves against unwanted financial obligations, and even out of consideration for their partner's well-being.So any change that would shift that balance a bit to encourage correct usage of condoms, even by a small amount, could provide a huge public benefit.But of course, there are always going to be some selfish people who don't care about protecting other people's health, or reducing the financial burden on the public from diseases and unwanted pregnancies.
All they see is a chance to score a benefit for themselves or their own cause--and if it ultimately at the expense of the public, well, that's not their problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432639</id>
	<title>Good to know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245679620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obama didn't waste one bit of our taxpayer money with his wishlist....I mean stimulus plan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama did n't waste one bit of our taxpayer money with his wishlist....I mean stimulus plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama didn't waste one bit of our taxpayer money with his wishlist....I mean stimulus plan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433605</id>
	<title>Sometimes A Condom IS A Good Thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245684900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having problems holding-back before pleasing your partner?  Put a condom on and fuck her brains out.  After she's come several times, pull it off and jack off all over her tits.</p><p>She'll think you're the best thing since her Rabbit and you'll feel like a pr0n star.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having problems holding-back before pleasing your partner ?
Put a condom on and fuck her brains out .
After she 's come several times , pull it off and jack off all over her tits.She 'll think you 're the best thing since her Rabbit and you 'll feel like a pr0n star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having problems holding-back before pleasing your partner?
Put a condom on and fuck her brains out.
After she's come several times, pull it off and jack off all over her tits.She'll think you're the best thing since her Rabbit and you'll feel like a pr0n star.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1245679920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The "obvious" answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity. However, it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently, some men use them some times and not others, and some men avoid them whenever possible. "It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences. Something else must be going on.</p></div><p>I will tell you exactly what that something else is.  It's all in the head (figuratively, the big one).<br>

Most people, including men, want what they can't have.  They want girl A when they're with girl B and vis versa.  They think of a blowjob while they're having sex and sex while they're receiving a blowjob.  They want to have a steady girlfriend who performs great in bed, but they get turned on by the thought of cheating on her.  What you can't have is exactly what you want..<br>

You can't have condomless sex, so it becomes more desirable.  Start having condomless sex, and you want to have sex with a condom.<br>

Of course most men don't really have a problem getting off no matter what, so this is mostly moot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " obvious " answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity .
However , it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently , some men use them some times and not others , and some men avoid them whenever possible .
" It feels like a garden hose " is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences .
Something else must be going on.I will tell you exactly what that something else is .
It 's all in the head ( figuratively , the big one ) .
Most people , including men , want what they ca n't have .
They want girl A when they 're with girl B and vis versa .
They think of a blowjob while they 're having sex and sex while they 're receiving a blowjob .
They want to have a steady girlfriend who performs great in bed , but they get turned on by the thought of cheating on her .
What you ca n't have is exactly what you want. . You ca n't have condomless sex , so it becomes more desirable .
Start having condomless sex , and you want to have sex with a condom .
Of course most men do n't really have a problem getting off no matter what , so this is mostly moot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "obvious" answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity.
However, it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently, some men use them some times and not others, and some men avoid them whenever possible.
"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.
Something else must be going on.I will tell you exactly what that something else is.
It's all in the head (figuratively, the big one).
Most people, including men, want what they can't have.
They want girl A when they're with girl B and vis versa.
They think of a blowjob while they're having sex and sex while they're receiving a blowjob.
They want to have a steady girlfriend who performs great in bed, but they get turned on by the thought of cheating on her.
What you can't have is exactly what you want..

You can't have condomless sex, so it becomes more desirable.
Start having condomless sex, and you want to have sex with a condom.
Of course most men don't really have a problem getting off no matter what, so this is mostly moot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442247</id>
	<title>Because we want to reproduce.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245784200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we stop ignoring the 900 pound gorilla in the room? We (men) want to ejaculate <em>inside</em> &ldquo;her&rdquo; to cause pregnancy. Wearing condoms eliminates that; we become consciously aware that we are defeating the process and that will diminish the biological urge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we stop ignoring the 900 pound gorilla in the room ?
We ( men ) want to ejaculate inside    her    to cause pregnancy .
Wearing condoms eliminates that ; we become consciously aware that we are defeating the process and that will diminish the biological urge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we stop ignoring the 900 pound gorilla in the room?
We (men) want to ejaculate inside “her” to cause pregnancy.
Wearing condoms eliminates that; we become consciously aware that we are defeating the process and that will diminish the biological urge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430809</id>
	<title>duh ummm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ummmm how about you just give me the cash and I'll tell you what will be in the report..... boot to da head as me and my friends used to always say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ummmm how about you just give me the cash and I 'll tell you what will be in the report..... boot to da head as me and my friends used to always say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ummmm how about you just give me the cash and I'll tell you what will be in the report..... boot to da head as me and my friends used to always say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432135</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245677280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy tard!</p><p>Did they teach sex-ed at your school or what? Pulling out doesn't work because some guys have "pre-cum" and don't know it. Based on your experiences you or your ex-girlfriend might have fertility issues and be blissfully unaware. Never-mind STDs.</p><p>"pulling out", rhythm method, etc. do work some what but have a very high failure rate. Get some sex-ed and save some lives man!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy tard ! Did they teach sex-ed at your school or what ?
Pulling out does n't work because some guys have " pre-cum " and do n't know it .
Based on your experiences you or your ex-girlfriend might have fertility issues and be blissfully unaware .
Never-mind STDs .
" pulling out " , rhythm method , etc .
do work some what but have a very high failure rate .
Get some sex-ed and save some lives man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy tard!Did they teach sex-ed at your school or what?
Pulling out doesn't work because some guys have "pre-cum" and don't know it.
Based on your experiences you or your ex-girlfriend might have fertility issues and be blissfully unaware.
Never-mind STDs.
"pulling out", rhythm method, etc.
do work some what but have a very high failure rate.
Get some sex-ed and save some lives man!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470477</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1245961200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quiet, Hans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quiet , Hans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quiet, Hans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432453</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>yali</author>
	<datestamp>1245677580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "obvious" answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity. However, it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently, some men use them some times and not others, and some men avoid them whenever possible. "It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences. Something else must be going on. Are some men using condoms wrong? Are some men overestimating the reduction in sensitivity, perhaps because of preconceptions? Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex?
</p><p>"Wasted tax money" is a red herring designed to give people an excuse to titter and dismiss this research without thinking it through. The obvious applied goal of this research would be to get more men to use condoms when having potentially risky sex. If you can identify the relevant factors (between men, between their partners, between situations) you might be able to increase condom usage. That has the potential to reduce STI and HIV infections and unwanted pregnancies. The real problem with this research is that it threatens to suggest something other than "abstinence until marriage and then one opposite-sex partner for life" as a potential model for a safe and satisfying sex life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " obvious " answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity .
However , it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently , some men use them some times and not others , and some men avoid them whenever possible .
" It feels like a garden hose " is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences .
Something else must be going on .
Are some men using condoms wrong ?
Are some men overestimating the reduction in sensitivity , perhaps because of preconceptions ?
Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex ?
" Wasted tax money " is a red herring designed to give people an excuse to titter and dismiss this research without thinking it through .
The obvious applied goal of this research would be to get more men to use condoms when having potentially risky sex .
If you can identify the relevant factors ( between men , between their partners , between situations ) you might be able to increase condom usage .
That has the potential to reduce STI and HIV infections and unwanted pregnancies .
The real problem with this research is that it threatens to suggest something other than " abstinence until marriage and then one opposite-sex partner for life " as a potential model for a safe and satisfying sex life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "obvious" answer that everybody is mentioning is that condoms reduce sensitivity.
However, it is a fact that some men use condoms consistently, some men use them some times and not others, and some men avoid them whenever possible.
"It feels like a garden hose" is a vague and general statement about condoms that offers little useful information about the nature of those differences.
Something else must be going on.
Are some men using condoms wrong?
Are some men overestimating the reduction in sensitivity, perhaps because of preconceptions?
Are some men underestimating the risks associated with unprotected sex?
"Wasted tax money" is a red herring designed to give people an excuse to titter and dismiss this research without thinking it through.
The obvious applied goal of this research would be to get more men to use condoms when having potentially risky sex.
If you can identify the relevant factors (between men, between their partners, between situations) you might be able to increase condom usage.
That has the potential to reduce STI and HIV infections and unwanted pregnancies.
The real problem with this research is that it threatens to suggest something other than "abstinence until marriage and then one opposite-sex partner for life" as a potential model for a safe and satisfying sex life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431603</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Shadow of Eternity</author>
	<datestamp>1245674700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or to quote a Farker when the same story showed up there the other day:</p><p>"Same reason you don't like eating steak with a balloon an your tongue... you can feel it, but you can't taste it."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or to quote a Farker when the same story showed up there the other day : " Same reason you do n't like eating steak with a balloon an your tongue... you can feel it , but you ca n't taste it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or to quote a Farker when the same story showed up there the other day:"Same reason you don't like eating steak with a balloon an your tongue... you can feel it, but you can't taste it.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440925</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>DinDaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1245779760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> They sell "ultra-thin" brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers.</p></div><p>Don't the sharks' teeth make more holes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They sell " ultra-thin " brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers.Do n't the sharks ' teeth make more holes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> They sell "ultra-thin" brands overseas that are quality-checked for small holes via lasers.Don't the sharks' teeth make more holes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432783</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Beefpatrol</author>
	<datestamp>1245680280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe that is because more effort is required to make sex with a circumsized schlong worthwhile, so people have less sex.  Perhaps I should read the article first -- it might address that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that is because more effort is required to make sex with a circumsized schlong worthwhile , so people have less sex .
Perhaps I should read the article first -- it might address that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that is because more effort is required to make sex with a circumsized schlong worthwhile, so people have less sex.
Perhaps I should read the article first -- it might address that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432649</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245679680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the other end of the spectrum, no one makes a condom small enough that fits well on me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other end of the spectrum , no one makes a condom small enough that fits well on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other end of the spectrum, no one makes a condom small enough that fits well on me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433845</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Burning1</author>
	<datestamp>1245686400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great post. Minor nitpick:</p><blockquote><div><p>While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much. From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.</p></div></blockquote><p>The effectiveness of latex condoms is not guaranteed -- no one is going to pay your child support or replace the condom if it breaks. It has however been carefully studied.</p><p>In my experience, a good polyurethane condom protects just as well as a latex condom if you treat it properly. However, poly condoms aren't as flexible as latex, and it can sometimes be difficult to get them on -- for that reason, they are a little prone to being nicked. Because poly condoms cost $3 a piece, and come in small packs, people are more likely to use a questionable condom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great post .
Minor nitpick : While this is true , the good , thin and reliable latex condoms do n't mitigate it by that much .
From what I 've heard , polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity , but it 's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as " guaranteed " as latex condoms.The effectiveness of latex condoms is not guaranteed -- no one is going to pay your child support or replace the condom if it breaks .
It has however been carefully studied.In my experience , a good polyurethane condom protects just as well as a latex condom if you treat it properly .
However , poly condoms are n't as flexible as latex , and it can sometimes be difficult to get them on -- for that reason , they are a little prone to being nicked .
Because poly condoms cost $ 3 a piece , and come in small packs , people are more likely to use a questionable condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great post.
Minor nitpick:While this is true, the good, thin and reliable latex condoms don't mitigate it by that much.
From what I've heard, polyurethane condoms are an excellent alternative with CRAZY sensitivity, but it's a bit risky considering that its effectiveness is not as "guaranteed" as latex condoms.The effectiveness of latex condoms is not guaranteed -- no one is going to pay your child support or replace the condom if it breaks.
It has however been carefully studied.In my experience, a good polyurethane condom protects just as well as a latex condom if you treat it properly.
However, poly condoms aren't as flexible as latex, and it can sometimes be difficult to get them on -- for that reason, they are a little prone to being nicked.
Because poly condoms cost $3 a piece, and come in small packs, people are more likely to use a questionable condom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435345</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1245697980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can't have condomless sex, so it becomes more desirable. Start having condomless sex, and you want to have sex with a condom.</p></div><p> <b>BULLSHIT.</b></p><p>I have had sex both with and without a condom and I assure you, I never once wished that I was wearing one when I wasn't.  Now, I'm not saying that all men are like that, but judging by my sibling posts (and the opinions of countless other people I've hard over the years), it would seem to be the vast majority.</p><p>The parent is stereotyping, generalized, sexist tripe.</p><p>And yes, you can be sexist against men.  Thanks for playing, please take your pop "explains it all" psychology to thirty years ago where it belongs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't have condomless sex , so it becomes more desirable .
Start having condomless sex , and you want to have sex with a condom .
BULLSHIT.I have had sex both with and without a condom and I assure you , I never once wished that I was wearing one when I was n't .
Now , I 'm not saying that all men are like that , but judging by my sibling posts ( and the opinions of countless other people I 've hard over the years ) , it would seem to be the vast majority.The parent is stereotyping , generalized , sexist tripe.And yes , you can be sexist against men .
Thanks for playing , please take your pop " explains it all " psychology to thirty years ago where it belongs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't have condomless sex, so it becomes more desirable.
Start having condomless sex, and you want to have sex with a condom.
BULLSHIT.I have had sex both with and without a condom and I assure you, I never once wished that I was wearing one when I wasn't.
Now, I'm not saying that all men are like that, but judging by my sibling posts (and the opinions of countless other people I've hard over the years), it would seem to be the vast majority.The parent is stereotyping, generalized, sexist tripe.And yes, you can be sexist against men.
Thanks for playing, please take your pop "explains it all" psychology to thirty years ago where it belongs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430775</id>
	<title>because they keep your sperm inside them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>qed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>qed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>qed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432327</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245678120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The #1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra.</p><p>#2 is that Americans generally don't even question it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The # 1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra. # 2 is that Americans generally do n't even question it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The #1 reason for American doctors PUSHING circumcision is that they get YOU to pay extra.#2 is that Americans generally don't even question it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430851</id>
	<title>Greater Good</title>
	<author>jlechem</author>
	<datestamp>1245672300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one will volunteer heartily for this *ahem* study.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one will volunteer heartily for this * ahem * study .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one will volunteer heartily for this *ahem* study.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450699</id>
	<title>If you are a normally functioning male ....</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1245843660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you should get back to action in short time after further foreplay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you should get back to action in short time after further foreplay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you should get back to action in short time after further foreplay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431089</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1245673080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.</p></div><p>Well, this being Slashdot, I think we've already got that one covered.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , if they made one that felt BETTER , we could eliminate women altogether.Well , this being Slashdot , I think we 've already got that one covered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, if they made one that felt BETTER, we could eliminate women altogether.Well, this being Slashdot, I think we've already got that one covered.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447719</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Mr. Roadkill</author>
	<datestamp>1245764100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>or an alternative barrier product is invented.</p></div><p>Llamas. You don't pay extra for fur or ridges.<br> (apologies to the rest of the slashdot community for this old in-joke)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or an alternative barrier product is invented.Llamas .
You do n't pay extra for fur or ridges .
( apologies to the rest of the slashdot community for this old in-joke )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or an alternative barrier product is invented.Llamas.
You don't pay extra for fur or ridges.
(apologies to the rest of the slashdot community for this old in-joke)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437917</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>cemulli</author>
	<datestamp>1245767220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/" title="msn.com" rel="nofollow">They are working on more non-condom birth control options for men</a> [msn.com].<p>
But then, like Macgrrl, I wouldn't trust a guy that he was on 'the pill' either unless I was living with him and thus knew for sure that he 1) had a prescription and 2) was taking it appropriately (or, y'know, was getting shots every few months to stay nice and sterile). A friend of mine found herself in the stereotypical situation where her boyfriend got her pregnant shortly after she started college, and then the guy suddenly skipped town. Quite a winner. </p><p>
My fiance hasn't voiced any complaints about condoms since we started using a specialty brand. If you're not just grabbing a box of Trojan Magnums to impress the hot girl at the checkout, or quickly throwing some random box into the shopping cart and covering it with a pair of boxers so people don't see you hanging around in the pharmacy department reading the backs of condom boxes, you might actually have better luck finding condoms that you can deal with. Hell, try buying online. Places like condomdepot.com also have sampler packs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are working on more non-condom birth control options for men [ msn.com ] .
But then , like Macgrrl , I would n't trust a guy that he was on 'the pill ' either unless I was living with him and thus knew for sure that he 1 ) had a prescription and 2 ) was taking it appropriately ( or , y'know , was getting shots every few months to stay nice and sterile ) .
A friend of mine found herself in the stereotypical situation where her boyfriend got her pregnant shortly after she started college , and then the guy suddenly skipped town .
Quite a winner .
My fiance has n't voiced any complaints about condoms since we started using a specialty brand .
If you 're not just grabbing a box of Trojan Magnums to impress the hot girl at the checkout , or quickly throwing some random box into the shopping cart and covering it with a pair of boxers so people do n't see you hanging around in the pharmacy department reading the backs of condom boxes , you might actually have better luck finding condoms that you can deal with .
Hell , try buying online .
Places like condomdepot.com also have sampler packs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are working on more non-condom birth control options for men [msn.com].
But then, like Macgrrl, I wouldn't trust a guy that he was on 'the pill' either unless I was living with him and thus knew for sure that he 1) had a prescription and 2) was taking it appropriately (or, y'know, was getting shots every few months to stay nice and sterile).
A friend of mine found herself in the stereotypical situation where her boyfriend got her pregnant shortly after she started college, and then the guy suddenly skipped town.
Quite a winner.
My fiance hasn't voiced any complaints about condoms since we started using a specialty brand.
If you're not just grabbing a box of Trojan Magnums to impress the hot girl at the checkout, or quickly throwing some random box into the shopping cart and covering it with a pair of boxers so people don't see you hanging around in the pharmacy department reading the backs of condom boxes, you might actually have better luck finding condoms that you can deal with.
Hell, try buying online.
Places like condomdepot.com also have sampler packs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Manip</author>
	<datestamp>1245673560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Men who disregard birth-control entirely are dicks. Condoms are pretty universally unpopular amongst men and are somewhat unpopular with women too.</p><p>Why? You're stretching a piece of rubber across places and both parties are fully aware of that fact. Do I need to explain more?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Men who disregard birth-control entirely are dicks .
Condoms are pretty universally unpopular amongst men and are somewhat unpopular with women too.Why ?
You 're stretching a piece of rubber across places and both parties are fully aware of that fact .
Do I need to explain more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Men who disregard birth-control entirely are dicks.
Condoms are pretty universally unpopular amongst men and are somewhat unpopular with women too.Why?
You're stretching a piece of rubber across places and both parties are fully aware of that fact.
Do I need to explain more?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436423</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Rufty</author>
	<datestamp>1245753000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But in Germany you get packs of seven, one for each day of the week. And in France the "nine pack" with two-a-day for the weekend. And in England a full twelve. January, February...</htmltext>
<tokenext>But in Germany you get packs of seven , one for each day of the week .
And in France the " nine pack " with two-a-day for the weekend .
And in England a full twelve .
January , February.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in Germany you get packs of seven, one for each day of the week.
And in France the "nine pack" with two-a-day for the weekend.
And in England a full twelve.
January, February...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28461269</id>
	<title>Why bother?</title>
	<author>KudyardRipling</author>
	<datestamp>1245851160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Abortion is safe and legal, all STD's are treatable, and welfare is available. Sex and responsibility are like church and state. These must remain separate in an modern enlightened society.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Abortion is safe and legal , all STD 's are treatable , and welfare is available .
Sex and responsibility are like church and state .
These must remain separate in an modern enlightened society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abortion is safe and legal, all STD's are treatable, and welfare is available.
Sex and responsibility are like church and state.
These must remain separate in an modern enlightened society.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431637</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>broken\_chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1245674880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WARNING: Story may not reflect your experiences. Do not attempt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WARNING : Story may not reflect your experiences .
Do not attempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WARNING: Story may not reflect your experiences.
Do not attempt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431799</id>
	<title>Is this a joke?</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1245675720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have to <b> <i>pay</i> </b> researchers to study why men don't like condoms, then that says a LOT for the sexual lives of both parties.
<br> <br>
Seriously, folks, this is why school isn't just about academics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have to pay researchers to study why men do n't like condoms , then that says a LOT for the sexual lives of both parties .
Seriously , folks , this is why school is n't just about academics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have to  pay  researchers to study why men don't like condoms, then that says a LOT for the sexual lives of both parties.
Seriously, folks, this is why school isn't just about academics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431087</id>
	<title>Get back on k5 already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we miss yuor vertispam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we miss yuor vertispam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we miss yuor vertispam</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431359</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Elitist\_Phoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1245673980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cause of and solution to all of life's problems... alcohol!<br>Smell - Keep drinking<br>Spontaneity - If you and her are sufficiently boosed, no biggy... hell even feel free to miss the hole a couple of times.<br>Sensitivity - If shes boosed, means you can pound harder.<br>Can't find one? - Douche her with it later (really sorry about this one)<br>Disgusting to take off and dispose of? - Drink more and then you'll be playing the awesome game of seeing how many you can get to stick to the hotel ceiling!<br>Stds - Either drench if it 95\% straight afterwards and if that didn't work start drinking to forget about the AIDS.</p><p>Then for later on in life or after the mistake:<br>Children - Drink more it'll numb the pain.</p><p>This Post was sponsored by Duff beer... Ohh yeah!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cause of and solution to all of life 's problems... alcohol ! Smell - Keep drinkingSpontaneity - If you and her are sufficiently boosed , no biggy... hell even feel free to miss the hole a couple of times.Sensitivity - If shes boosed , means you can pound harder.Ca n't find one ?
- Douche her with it later ( really sorry about this one ) Disgusting to take off and dispose of ?
- Drink more and then you 'll be playing the awesome game of seeing how many you can get to stick to the hotel ceiling ! Stds - Either drench if it 95 \ % straight afterwards and if that did n't work start drinking to forget about the AIDS.Then for later on in life or after the mistake : Children - Drink more it 'll numb the pain.This Post was sponsored by Duff beer... Ohh yeah !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cause of and solution to all of life's problems... alcohol!Smell - Keep drinkingSpontaneity - If you and her are sufficiently boosed, no biggy... hell even feel free to miss the hole a couple of times.Sensitivity - If shes boosed, means you can pound harder.Can't find one?
- Douche her with it later (really sorry about this one)Disgusting to take off and dispose of?
- Drink more and then you'll be playing the awesome game of seeing how many you can get to stick to the hotel ceiling!Stds - Either drench if it 95\% straight afterwards and if that didn't work start drinking to forget about the AIDS.Then for later on in life or after the mistake:Children - Drink more it'll numb the pain.This Post was sponsored by Duff beer... Ohh yeah!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436963</id>
	<title>Circumcision</title>
	<author>DeanFox</author>
	<datestamp>1245759840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
Maybe with enough studies like this circumcision rates in the US will continue to drop.  If they're looking for it I'm sure they'll find a correlation between condom use and circumcision with complaints of sensitivity.
<br> <br>

Here's a decent link to circumcision rates by region:  <a href="http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/" title="cirp.org">http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/</a> [cirp.org]  Combined, 73\% - 81\% are still being cut in the USA.  In 1932 around 30\% of the USA populations was circumcised.  It seems to have peaked in 1965 and will hopefully continue to drop.  But it's studies like this that get things going.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe with enough studies like this circumcision rates in the US will continue to drop .
If they 're looking for it I 'm sure they 'll find a correlation between condom use and circumcision with complaints of sensitivity .
Here 's a decent link to circumcision rates by region : http : //www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/ [ cirp.org ] Combined , 73 \ % - 81 \ % are still being cut in the USA .
In 1932 around 30 \ % of the USA populations was circumcised .
It seems to have peaked in 1965 and will hopefully continue to drop .
But it 's studies like this that get things going .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Maybe with enough studies like this circumcision rates in the US will continue to drop.
If they're looking for it I'm sure they'll find a correlation between condom use and circumcision with complaints of sensitivity.
Here's a decent link to circumcision rates by region:  http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/ [cirp.org]  Combined, 73\% - 81\% are still being cut in the USA.
In 1932 around 30\% of the USA populations was circumcised.
It seems to have peaked in 1965 and will hopefully continue to drop.
But it's studies like this that get things going.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245675300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A public service announcement for all citizens of the US of A: stop mutilating your children's cocks.</p><p>Seriously, what is the matter with you nutjobs?  The idea that circumcision promotes cock health is long since disproven.  Put the knife down.  Step away from the cock.  Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A public service announcement for all citizens of the US of A : stop mutilating your children 's cocks.Seriously , what is the matter with you nutjobs ?
The idea that circumcision promotes cock health is long since disproven .
Put the knife down .
Step away from the cock .
Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A public service announcement for all citizens of the US of A: stop mutilating your children's cocks.Seriously, what is the matter with you nutjobs?
The idea that circumcision promotes cock health is long since disproven.
Put the knife down.
Step away from the cock.
Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449683</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>dwarfsoft</author>
	<datestamp>1245785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.xkcd.com/584/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">I somehow feel like deja vu has just walked in and then deja vu walked in</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I somehow feel like deja vu has just walked in and then deja vu walked in [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I somehow feel like deja vu has just walked in and then deja vu walked in [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431701</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1245675240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important,</p> </div><p>Well, that's a tough one...</p><p>INCREASE ITS BLOODY DIAMETER, THAT'S HOW</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , if the study is " how can we FIX what men do n't like about condoms " , then the study becomes very important , Well , that 's a tough one...INCREASE ITS BLOODY DIAMETER , THAT 'S HOW</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, Well, that's a tough one...INCREASE ITS BLOODY DIAMETER, THAT'S HOW
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434931</id>
	<title>Re:it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1245693840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>it can make your dick go limp</p></div></blockquote><p>

If this is a problem, then you either need to drink less or try a different kind of medication (normally blue although the generics from India are often yellow).</p><blockquote><div><p>its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now</p></div></blockquote><p>

Here's a novel idea, ask her to do it for you<br> <br>

and if you kept receipts are organised she'll be done before you are.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it can make your dick go limp If this is a problem , then you either need to drink less or try a different kind of medication ( normally blue although the generics from India are often yellow ) .its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now Here 's a novel idea , ask her to do it for you and if you kept receipts are organised she 'll be done before you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it can make your dick go limp

If this is a problem, then you either need to drink less or try a different kind of medication (normally blue although the generics from India are often yellow).its the same as being in a sexually arousing situation and suddenly being asked to fill out form 1040A and pay your taxes right now

Here's a novel idea, ask her to do it for you 

and if you kept receipts are organised she'll be done before you are.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432957</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245681180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those studies about HIV and male circumcision have been made by "circumcision fanatics" (I can't believe there is such a thing but there is).<br>In one case they didn't even conclude the experiment, the reason they gave is that they felt the moral obligation to give a circumcision to all the subjects in the experiments before completing it.<br>Also this helps only a men having vaginal intercourse, but with vaginal intercourse the woman is the subject at a greeter risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those studies about HIV and male circumcision have been made by " circumcision fanatics " ( I ca n't believe there is such a thing but there is ) .In one case they did n't even conclude the experiment , the reason they gave is that they felt the moral obligation to give a circumcision to all the subjects in the experiments before completing it.Also this helps only a men having vaginal intercourse , but with vaginal intercourse the woman is the subject at a greeter risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those studies about HIV and male circumcision have been made by "circumcision fanatics" (I can't believe there is such a thing but there is).In one case they didn't even conclude the experiment, the reason they gave is that they felt the moral obligation to give a circumcision to all the subjects in the experiments before completing it.Also this helps only a men having vaginal intercourse, but with vaginal intercourse the woman is the subject at a greeter risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813</id>
	<title>Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245672120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For men with smaller or chopped foreskins, condoms interfere with sexual pleasure and frankly, when I'm in bed with a beautiful naked girl, the last thing I need is for a cock sock.  Pretty naked girl overrides sanity, to the point where if the condom gets in the way, the logical answer is to rip it off and go without.</p><p>Slashdot, news for nerds.  Now bringing you, sex for geeks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For men with smaller or chopped foreskins , condoms interfere with sexual pleasure and frankly , when I 'm in bed with a beautiful naked girl , the last thing I need is for a cock sock .
Pretty naked girl overrides sanity , to the point where if the condom gets in the way , the logical answer is to rip it off and go without.Slashdot , news for nerds .
Now bringing you , sex for geeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For men with smaller or chopped foreskins, condoms interfere with sexual pleasure and frankly, when I'm in bed with a beautiful naked girl, the last thing I need is for a cock sock.
Pretty naked girl overrides sanity, to the point where if the condom gets in the way, the logical answer is to rip it off and go without.Slashdot, news for nerds.
Now bringing you, sex for geeks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431955</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245676380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not entirely: http://www.arhp.org/crc/compare-methods.html shows Norplant as being more effective.  And it's not permanent.</p><p>Of course, both together and you're solid, but a vasectomy is not quite as certain as a lot of people think it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not entirely : http : //www.arhp.org/crc/compare-methods.html shows Norplant as being more effective .
And it 's not permanent.Of course , both together and you 're solid , but a vasectomy is not quite as certain as a lot of people think it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not entirely: http://www.arhp.org/crc/compare-methods.html shows Norplant as being more effective.
And it's not permanent.Of course, both together and you're solid, but a vasectomy is not quite as certain as a lot of people think it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245673140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend "went off the pill" in a, what he says, deliberate attempt to get pregnant.  So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her.  Few years later they got married.  Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself.  Turns out she had been seeing fertility expert after fertility expert who said it wasn't her, but she didn't believe it, and she refused to get him tested because she was sure it was her problem.  Needless to say, they got divorced and she got a new boyfriend and had a bunch of kids and eventually got more sane and came and spoke to him about it and he insisted that he had told her about the vasectomy, and she insisted he didn't (he didn't) and she just put it down to the fact that she was insane (clinically diagnosed and all).  Since then his relationships have become significantly less pathological and his current girlfriend is well aware that he wont be having any kids.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend " went off the pill " in a , what he says , deliberate attempt to get pregnant .
So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her .
Few years later they got married .
Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself .
Turns out she had been seeing fertility expert after fertility expert who said it was n't her , but she did n't believe it , and she refused to get him tested because she was sure it was her problem .
Needless to say , they got divorced and she got a new boyfriend and had a bunch of kids and eventually got more sane and came and spoke to him about it and he insisted that he had told her about the vasectomy , and she insisted he did n't ( he did n't ) and she just put it down to the fact that she was insane ( clinically diagnosed and all ) .
Since then his relationships have become significantly less pathological and his current girlfriend is well aware that he wont be having any kids .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Friend of mine got a scare or two when his girlfriend "went off the pill" in a, what he says, deliberate attempt to get pregnant.
So he went off and got a vasectomy without telling her.
Few years later they got married.
Few years after that she went batshit insane and ended up committing herself.
Turns out she had been seeing fertility expert after fertility expert who said it wasn't her, but she didn't believe it, and she refused to get him tested because she was sure it was her problem.
Needless to say, they got divorced and she got a new boyfriend and had a bunch of kids and eventually got more sane and came and spoke to him about it and he insisted that he had told her about the vasectomy, and she insisted he didn't (he didn't) and she just put it down to the fact that she was insane (clinically diagnosed and all).
Since then his relationships have become significantly less pathological and his current girlfriend is well aware that he wont be having any kids.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431725</id>
	<title>Re:it interrupts the flow of things and so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245675360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Serioulsy?  If you can't hold an erection for a minute while in bed with a naked woman (or man, I guess), perhaps you really weren't that horny in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Serioulsy ?
If you ca n't hold an erection for a minute while in bed with a naked woman ( or man , I guess ) , perhaps you really were n't that horny in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serioulsy?
If you can't hold an erection for a minute while in bed with a naked woman (or man, I guess), perhaps you really weren't that horny in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433059</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is the main thrust of the study?</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1245681720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.</b></p> </div><p>From reading the actual <a href="http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/CRISP\_LIB.getdoc?textkey=7619840&amp;p\_grant\_num=1R21HD060447-01&amp;p\_query=&amp;ticket=96928666&amp;p\_audit\_session\_id=471881987&amp;p\_keywords=" title="nih.gov">research proposal abstract</a> [nih.gov], yes, the goal of the research is determining what sorts of interventions will help encourage proper condom use:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Grant Number:    1R21HD060447-01</p><p>Project Title:    Barriers to Correct Condom Use</p><p>PI Information:    Name    Email    Title<br>JANSSEN, ERICK (Contact)    ejanssen@indiana.edu    PROFESSOR<br>SANDERS, STEPHANIE A.</p><p>Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks. About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior. About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission. Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring. Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs. Yet, studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use. This project aims to advance our understanding of, among other factors, the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young, heterosexual adult men. A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires, observational, and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention. The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative, more effective, and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks. Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs, yet studies show that problems with condom use are common. This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young, heterosexual adult men.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , if the study is " how can we FIX what men do n't like about condoms " , then the study becomes very important , and might benefit society immensely .
From reading the actual research proposal abstract [ nih.gov ] , yes , the goal of the research is determining what sorts of interventions will help encourage proper condom use : Grant Number : 1R21HD060447-01Project Title : Barriers to Correct Condom UsePI Information : Name Email TitleJANSSEN , ERICK ( Contact ) ejanssen @ indiana.edu PROFESSORSANDERS , STEPHANIE A.Abstract : DESCRIPTION ( provided by applicant ) : Sexually transmitted infections ( STI ) , including human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) , pose significant health risks .
About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior .
About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission .
Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring .
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs .
Yet , studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use .
This project aims to advance our understanding of , among other factors , the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young , heterosexual adult men .
A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires , observational , and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention .
The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative , more effective , and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively .
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE : Sexually transmitted infections ( STI ) , including human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) , pose significant health risks .
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs , yet studies show that problems with condom use are common .
This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young , heterosexual adult men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> However, if the study is "how can we FIX what men don't like about condoms", then the study becomes very important, and might benefit society immensely.
From reading the actual research proposal abstract [nih.gov], yes, the goal of the research is determining what sorts of interventions will help encourage proper condom use:Grant Number:    1R21HD060447-01Project Title:    Barriers to Correct Condom UsePI Information:    Name    Email    TitleJANSSEN, ERICK (Contact)    ejanssen@indiana.edu    PROFESSORSANDERS, STEPHANIE A.Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks.
About half of the new HIV infections in the US are among people under age 25 years with the majority infected through sexual behavior.
About one in three new diagnoses with HIV/AIDS are attributed to heterosexual transmission.
Men who have sex with women play a major role in HIV transmission to women who can also pass it on to offspring.
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs.
Yet, studies show that problems with condom use are common and that these problems pose a barrier to consistent and complete condom use.
This project aims to advance our understanding of, among other factors, the role of cognitive and affective processes and condom application skills in explaining problems with condom use in young, heterosexual adult men.
A multi-method approach - consisting of two studies and involving questionnaires, observational, and psychophysiological methods - will be used in conjunction with a skill-based intervention.
The knowledge gained from the proposed research can be used to inform the development of innovative, more effective, and targeted intervention and education strategies tailored to the needs of individuals who have trouble using condoms effectively.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Sexually transmitted infections (STI), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), pose significant health risks.
Consistent and correct use of condoms can be a highly effective method of preventing the transmission of HIV and many STIs, yet studies show that problems with condom use are common.
This project is one of the first to examine under controlled conditions the role of cognitive and affective factors and condom skills in explaining condom use problems in young, heterosexual adult men.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440519</id>
	<title>Looking in the wrong place</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245778320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sex is in the mind. People like to "feel" close... If you put something between them, then the degree of contact is being restricted... If they don't know this is happening, I doubt they'd be bothered. But since they do know, it's a factor in the equation in their mind.

That's all there is to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sex is in the mind .
People like to " feel " close... If you put something between them , then the degree of contact is being restricted... If they do n't know this is happening , I doubt they 'd be bothered .
But since they do know , it 's a factor in the equation in their mind .
That 's all there is to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sex is in the mind.
People like to "feel" close... If you put something between them, then the degree of contact is being restricted... If they don't know this is happening, I doubt they'd be bothered.
But since they do know, it's a factor in the equation in their mind.
That's all there is to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437061</id>
	<title>Re:DUH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245760800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because pulling out NEVER WORKS. You just got extremely lucky. Extremely. Lucky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because pulling out NEVER WORKS .
You just got extremely lucky .
Extremely. Lucky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because pulling out NEVER WORKS.
You just got extremely lucky.
Extremely. Lucky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435845</id>
	<title>Polyurethane?</title>
	<author>rastoboy29</author>
	<datestamp>1245789300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>I can't believe no one has brought up polyurethane condoms (Avanti is the only brand I know of in the US).<br><br>They are much thinner than latex or any other material.<br><br>They feel damn close to like nothing at all.<br><br>Stick a pencil in a latex condom until it breaks.<br><br>Do the same with a polyurethane.&nbsp; 'nuff said.&nbsp; Shit is the bomb.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe no one has brought up polyurethane condoms ( Avanti is the only brand I know of in the US ) .They are much thinner than latex or any other material.They feel damn close to like nothing at all.Stick a pencil in a latex condom until it breaks.Do the same with a polyurethane.   'nuff said.   Shit is the bomb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe no one has brought up polyurethane condoms (Avanti is the only brand I know of in the US).They are much thinner than latex or any other material.They feel damn close to like nothing at all.Stick a pencil in a latex condom until it breaks.Do the same with a polyurethane.  'nuff said.  Shit is the bomb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448259</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>gonz</author>
	<datestamp>1245769260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.</p></div><p>Not really.  <a href="http://www.condomman.com/articles/condom-use/condom-facts-and-statistics/" title="condomman.com" rel="nofollow">This site</a> [condomman.com] has some statistics:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>When used correctly and consistently every single time, condoms are about 98\% preventive against pregnancy.  However, the effectiveness rate for first-year condom users is about 86\%, as only an estimated 3\% of these users use condoms correctly and consistently during that time.  After that milestone, the prevention rate increases, and with typical consistent use the pregnancy rate is 2-4 out of 100 women per year.</p></div><p>Applying basic probability, if ("ideally") the chance of pregnancy is 2\%, then the chance of NOT getting pregnant over 10 years is (100\%-2\%)^10 = 81.7\%.  In other words, 1 out of 5 dudes is gonna paying child support after 10 years.</p><p>More realistically, if the failure rate is 4\%, then that's (100\%-4\%)^10 = 66.4\% chance of NOT getting pregnant.  In other words, 1 out of THREE dudes will be paying child support after 10 years.  Condoms suck!</p><p>And statistics is counterintuitive.  If contraceptive rates were quoted per-decade rather than per-year, contraception research would actually get the funding it deserves.</p><p>-Gonz</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite that they 're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support , or your penis turning green and falling off.Not really .
This site [ condomman.com ] has some statistics : When used correctly and consistently every single time , condoms are about 98 \ % preventive against pregnancy .
However , the effectiveness rate for first-year condom users is about 86 \ % , as only an estimated 3 \ % of these users use condoms correctly and consistently during that time .
After that milestone , the prevention rate increases , and with typical consistent use the pregnancy rate is 2-4 out of 100 women per year.Applying basic probability , if ( " ideally " ) the chance of pregnancy is 2 \ % , then the chance of NOT getting pregnant over 10 years is ( 100 \ % -2 \ % ) ^ 10 = 81.7 \ % .
In other words , 1 out of 5 dudes is gon na paying child support after 10 years.More realistically , if the failure rate is 4 \ % , then that 's ( 100 \ % -4 \ % ) ^ 10 = 66.4 \ % chance of NOT getting pregnant .
In other words , 1 out of THREE dudes will be paying child support after 10 years .
Condoms suck ! And statistics is counterintuitive .
If contraceptive rates were quoted per-decade rather than per-year , contraception research would actually get the funding it deserves.-Gonz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite that they're a good trade when weighed against the possibility of 18 years of child support, or your penis turning green and falling off.Not really.
This site [condomman.com] has some statistics:When used correctly and consistently every single time, condoms are about 98\% preventive against pregnancy.
However, the effectiveness rate for first-year condom users is about 86\%, as only an estimated 3\% of these users use condoms correctly and consistently during that time.
After that milestone, the prevention rate increases, and with typical consistent use the pregnancy rate is 2-4 out of 100 women per year.Applying basic probability, if ("ideally") the chance of pregnancy is 2\%, then the chance of NOT getting pregnant over 10 years is (100\%-2\%)^10 = 81.7\%.
In other words, 1 out of 5 dudes is gonna paying child support after 10 years.More realistically, if the failure rate is 4\%, then that's (100\%-4\%)^10 = 66.4\% chance of NOT getting pregnant.
In other words, 1 out of THREE dudes will be paying child support after 10 years.
Condoms suck!And statistics is counterintuitive.
If contraceptive rates were quoted per-decade rather than per-year, contraception research would actually get the funding it deserves.-Gonz
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437085</id>
	<title>Re:I'd think it was obvious to any man</title>
	<author>Scrab</author>
	<datestamp>1245761160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they're disgusting to take off, you're doing it wrong.  As far as I can tell, condoms make post-coital cleanup <i>easier</i>, because all the mess that a guy makes is contained.  <br>You just need to tie a knot in the top of the condom, and throw it away.  If you're feeling really fastidious about it, wrap it in a tissue first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 're disgusting to take off , you 're doing it wrong .
As far as I can tell , condoms make post-coital cleanup easier , because all the mess that a guy makes is contained .
You just need to tie a knot in the top of the condom , and throw it away .
If you 're feeling really fastidious about it , wrap it in a tissue first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they're disgusting to take off, you're doing it wrong.
As far as I can tell, condoms make post-coital cleanup easier, because all the mess that a guy makes is contained.
You just need to tie a knot in the top of the condom, and throw it away.
If you're feeling really fastidious about it, wrap it in a tissue first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431485</id>
	<title>cheap wow gold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weekends to people<a href="http://www.ig2t.net/" title="ig2t.net" rel="nofollow">ig2t</a> [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day <a href="http://www.wowgold4europe.net/" title="wowgold4europe.net" rel="nofollow">wowgold4europe</a> [wowgold4europe.net] good rest. For example&#239;&#188;OE people <a href="http://www.gameusd.org/" title="gameusd.org" rel="nofollow">gameusd</a> [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get <a href="http://www.meinwowgold.com/" title="meinwowgold.com" rel="nofollow">meinwowgold</a> [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each <a href="http://www.storeingame.net/" title="storeingame.net" rel="nofollow">storeingame</a> [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the <a href="http://www.speebie.org/" title="speebie.org" rel="nofollow">speebie</a> [speebie.org] whole family.
Everyone spends <a href="http://www.agamegold.org/" title="agamegold.org" rel="nofollow">agamegold</a> [agamegold.org] weekends in his own<a href="http://www.mmofly.org/" title="mmofly.org" rel="nofollow">mmofly</a> [mmofly.org] way. Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music&#239;&#188;OE reading novels&#239;&#188;OEor watching<a href="http://www.ogeworld.org/" title="ogeworld.org" rel="nofollow">ogeworld</a> [ogeworld.org] films. Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball&#239;&#188;OEwimming or<a href="http://www.mmorpgvip.net/" title="mmorpgvip.net" rel="nofollow">mmorpgvip</a> [mmorpgvip.net] dancing. Different people have different <a href="http://www.gamesavor.net/" title="gamesavor.net" rel="nofollow">gamesavor</a> [gamesavor.net] relaxations.
I often spend weekends with<a href="http://www.oggsale.net/" title="oggsale.net" rel="nofollow">oggsale</a> [oggsale.net] my family or my friends. Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends. Sometimes<a href="http://www.gamersell.net/" title="gamersell.net" rel="nofollow">gamersell</a> [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books to<a href="http://www.mmovirtex.net/" title="mmovirtex.net" rel="nofollow">mmovirtex</a> [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge. I also go to see various exhibition to broaden<a href="http://www.rpg-trader.net/" title="rpg-trader.net" rel="nofollow">rpg trader</a> [rpg-trader.net] my vision. An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends. Weekends are always enjoyable for me.
<a href="http://www.igxe.org/" title="igxe.org" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [igxe.org] <a href="http://www.swagvault.org/" title="swagvault.org" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.org] oforu <a href="http://www.wowgold-usa.org/" title="wowgold-usa.org" rel="nofollow">wowgold-usa</a> [wowgold-usa.org] <a href="http://www.ignmax.org/" title="ignmax.org" rel="nofollow">ignmax</a> [ignmax.org] <a href="http://www.wowgoldlive.net/" title="wowgoldlive.net" rel="nofollow">wowgoldlive</a> [wowgoldlive.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.net/" title="brogame.net" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.net]  <a href="http://www.thsale.org/" title="thsale.org" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.org] <a href="http://www.goldrocku.net/" title="goldrocku.net" rel="nofollow">GoldRockU</a> [goldrocku.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.us/" title="brogame.us" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.us]
 <a href="http://www.swagvault.us/" title="swagvault.us" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.us] <a href="http://www.goldsoon.us/" title="goldsoon.us" rel="nofollow">goldsoon</a> [goldsoon.us] <a href="http://www.oforu.us/" title="oforu.us" rel="nofollow">oforu</a> [oforu.us] <a href="http://www.igxe.us/" title="www.igxe.us" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [www.igxe.us] <a href="http://www.thsale.us/" title="thsale.us" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.us]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ ig2t.net ] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [ wowgold4europe.net ] good rest .
For example     OE people gameusd [ gameusd.org ] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [ meinwowgold.com ] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [ storeingame.net ] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [ speebie.org ] whole family .
Everyone spends agamegold [ agamegold.org ] weekends in his ownmmofly [ mmofly.org ] way .
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music     OE reading novels     OEor watchingogeworld [ ogeworld.org ] films .
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball     OEwimming ormmorpgvip [ mmorpgvip.net ] dancing .
Different people have different gamesavor [ gamesavor.net ] relaxations .
I often spend weekends withoggsale [ oggsale.net ] my family or my friends .
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends .
Sometimesgamersell [ gamersell.net ] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [ mmovirtex.net ] gain much knowledge .
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [ rpg-trader.net ] my vision .
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends .
Weekends are always enjoyable for me .
igxe [ igxe.org ] swagvault [ swagvault.org ] oforu wowgold-usa [ wowgold-usa.org ] ignmax [ ignmax.org ] wowgoldlive [ wowgoldlive.net ] brogame [ brogame.net ] thsale [ thsale.org ] GoldRockU [ goldrocku.net ] brogame [ brogame.us ] swagvault [ swagvault.us ] goldsoon [ goldsoon.us ] oforu [ oforu.us ] igxe [ www.igxe.us ] thsale [ thsale.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [wowgold4europe.net] good rest.
For exampleï¼OE people gameusd [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [speebie.org] whole family.
Everyone spends agamegold [agamegold.org] weekends in his ownmmofly [mmofly.org] way.
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to musicï¼OE reading novelsï¼OEor watchingogeworld [ogeworld.org] films.
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketballï¼OEwimming ormmorpgvip [mmorpgvip.net] dancing.
Different people have different gamesavor [gamesavor.net] relaxations.
I often spend weekends withoggsale [oggsale.net] my family or my friends.
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends.
Sometimesgamersell [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge.
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [rpg-trader.net] my vision.
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends.
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.
igxe [igxe.org] swagvault [swagvault.org] oforu wowgold-usa [wowgold-usa.org] ignmax [ignmax.org] wowgoldlive [wowgoldlive.net] brogame [brogame.net]  thsale [thsale.org] GoldRockU [goldrocku.net] brogame [brogame.us]
 swagvault [swagvault.us] goldsoon [goldsoon.us] oforu [oforu.us] igxe [www.igxe.us] thsale [thsale.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440001</id>
	<title>Why men?</title>
	<author>BishopBerkeley</author>
	<datestamp>1245776340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In my experience, it's always been the women who don't want it. Naturally, I hate using them, but it has always been my girlfriend who has chosen to throw caution in to the wind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my experience , it 's always been the women who do n't want it .
Naturally , I hate using them , but it has always been my girlfriend who has chosen to throw caution in to the wind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my experience, it's always been the women who don't want it.
Naturally, I hate using them, but it has always been my girlfriend who has chosen to throw caution in to the wind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436797</id>
	<title>Re:Here it is for 5c</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245757560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missing</p></div></blockquote><p>That, unfortunately, is not true.  We know full well what we're missing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missingThat , unfortunately , is not true .
We know full well what we 're missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but i understand that a foreskin-less man simply does not know what he is missingThat, unfortunately, is not true.
We know full well what we're missing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442625</id>
	<title>You're doing it wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245785580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recently, we ran out of doctor-provided condoms and had to go into the shops and buy new ones.  I bought a new brand, "Trojans".  My god they were terrible.  The were too thick, smelled terrible, and reacted poorly inside my partner.  Apparently they stung.  And they cost about 70c per condom, the cheapest in the store.  We went to Condomdepot and bought Durex thin ones and they arrived in a couple days, cost about 25c per condom.  They have better sensitivity, smell fine, and were cheaper.  They are excellent.  I don't know what people are complaining about.  Get a better condom for crying out loud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recently , we ran out of doctor-provided condoms and had to go into the shops and buy new ones .
I bought a new brand , " Trojans " .
My god they were terrible .
The were too thick , smelled terrible , and reacted poorly inside my partner .
Apparently they stung .
And they cost about 70c per condom , the cheapest in the store .
We went to Condomdepot and bought Durex thin ones and they arrived in a couple days , cost about 25c per condom .
They have better sensitivity , smell fine , and were cheaper .
They are excellent .
I do n't know what people are complaining about .
Get a better condom for crying out loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recently, we ran out of doctor-provided condoms and had to go into the shops and buy new ones.
I bought a new brand, "Trojans".
My god they were terrible.
The were too thick, smelled terrible, and reacted poorly inside my partner.
Apparently they stung.
And they cost about 70c per condom, the cheapest in the store.
We went to Condomdepot and bought Durex thin ones and they arrived in a couple days, cost about 25c per condom.
They have better sensitivity, smell fine, and were cheaper.
They are excellent.
I don't know what people are complaining about.
Get a better condom for crying out loud.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432619</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution.</title>
	<author>4181</author>
	<datestamp>1245679560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.</p></div><p>This is the start of a serious idea: <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1832445,00.html" title="time.com" rel="nofollow">Spray-On Condoms: Still a Hard Sell</a> [time.com] </p><p>Trouble seems to be drying time:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Liquid latex currently takes two to three minutes to vulcanize, making it impractical. "For people to buy it," Krause says, "it needs to be ready in five to 10 seconds."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.This is the start of a serious idea : Spray-On Condoms : Still a Hard Sell [ time.com ] Trouble seems to be drying time : Liquid latex currently takes two to three minutes to vulcanize , making it impractical .
" For people to buy it , " Krause says , " it needs to be ready in five to 10 seconds .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.This is the start of a serious idea: Spray-On Condoms: Still a Hard Sell [time.com] Trouble seems to be drying time:Liquid latex currently takes two to three minutes to vulcanize, making it impractical.
"For people to buy it," Krause says, "it needs to be ready in five to 10 seconds.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433731</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245685560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed."</p><p>Something tells me you're only being partly honest, and that you've got "Master-beater" instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed .
" Something tells me you 're only being partly honest , and that you 've got " Master-beater " instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now I keep a can of Sears Weather-beater next to my bed.
"Something tells me you're only being partly honest, and that you've got "Master-beater" instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431641</id>
	<title>Re:Vasectomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your story makes me glad I've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine. Yep. Very glad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your story makes me glad I 've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine .
Yep. Very glad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your story makes me glad I've made it absolutely clear to my girlfriend that I am NOT having children and will deny any she has are mine.
Yep. Very glad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435625</id>
	<title>Re:Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>No</i> man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.</p> </div><p>Be gay, and solve half of the problems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No man would rather wear a condom if people did n't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about .
Be gay , and solve half of the problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> No man would rather wear a condom if people didn't have pregnancies and STDs to worry about.
Be gay, and solve half of the problems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432217</id>
	<title>Re:Because they are a con</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245677640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... if you can't use a condom inside of four years, I think you may have other problems besides worrying about the loss of sensation...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... if you ca n't use a condom inside of four years , I think you may have other problems besides worrying about the loss of sensation.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... if you can't use a condom inside of four years, I think you may have other problems besides worrying about the loss of sensation...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435591</id>
	<title>Waiting for Pronto</title>
	<author>feldhaus</author>
	<datestamp>1245700200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When Pronto condoms (or the <a href="http://www.prontocondoms.co.za/" title="prontocondoms.co.za" rel="nofollow">rights/designs</a> [prontocondoms.co.za] for them) make it to Europe and the USA it will be a Good Day.<br>
<br>
These things can be applied in <a href="http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/1163165110/Pronto\_Condoms" title="yourdailymedia.com" rel="nofollow">less than one second</a> [yourdailymedia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>When Pronto condoms ( or the rights/designs [ prontocondoms.co.za ] for them ) make it to Europe and the USA it will be a Good Day .
These things can be applied in less than one second [ yourdailymedia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When Pronto condoms (or the rights/designs [prontocondoms.co.za] for them) make it to Europe and the USA it will be a Good Day.
These things can be applied in less than one second [yourdailymedia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439577</id>
	<title>Re:Brings up another issue.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245774600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean not reliable?  A condom is far more reliable than your car.  You have a well thought out point with regards to limited options available to men, but such a claim smells of abstinence-only propaganda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean not reliable ?
A condom is far more reliable than your car .
You have a well thought out point with regards to limited options available to men , but such a claim smells of abstinence-only propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean not reliable?
A condom is far more reliable than your car.
You have a well thought out point with regards to limited options available to men, but such a claim smells of abstinence-only propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431483</id>
	<title>Needs to be a blinded, controlled study:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245674280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man has sex 100 times, randomized half with condom, half without and he doesn't know which during the sex.<br>Rate each time and see if sex with condom isn't as good.</p><p>I volunteer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man has sex 100 times , randomized half with condom , half without and he does n't know which during the sex.Rate each time and see if sex with condom is n't as good.I volunteer ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man has sex 100 times, randomized half with condom, half without and he doesn't know which during the sex.Rate each time and see if sex with condom isn't as good.I volunteer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432683</id>
	<title>Re:Easy solution.</title>
	<author>Elitist\_Phoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1245679860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next question is which item takes priority on your bedside table/beer cartoon... the bottle of moonshine, the shotgun shells or that can of paint?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next question is which item takes priority on your bedside table/beer cartoon... the bottle of moonshine , the shotgun shells or that can of paint ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next question is which item takes priority on your bedside table/beer cartoon... the bottle of moonshine, the shotgun shells or that can of paint?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_144</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_152</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436593
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_150</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_139</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_147</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_157</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_141</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_151</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433853
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_146</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28451007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_154</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_140</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_149</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_148</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_156</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28446303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438039
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_143</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_153</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28461977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28492897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_142</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_145</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_155</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1616239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432609
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431125
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431641
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440895
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28451007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437061
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443487
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435721
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438039
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435289
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433501
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435703
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433853
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435353
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432453
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432331
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430925
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431411
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440215
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435027
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439833
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433163
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435587
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432705
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437305
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449683
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435345
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28492897
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431953
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432227
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435063
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432959
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435037
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28441935
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432351
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433419
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432843
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28446303
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433171
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440565
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436797
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435987
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436593
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432841
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435931
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433313
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434967
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439197
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28461977
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433317
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432875
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436363
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433079
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432783
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439547
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443601
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432957
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435687
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432327
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435213
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28443151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432361
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432465
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433019
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444419
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439521
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28448197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434151
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28444791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433315
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431603
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28442179
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432649
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434289
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433069
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447617
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435625
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437143
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432491
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436525
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436757
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28438173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433311
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432667
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434601
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28450705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28436423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432525
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28470859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431963
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440925
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28440463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431701
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433225
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28433299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432459
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430775
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434557
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28439577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28449425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28437917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28434851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28447719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28432913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28435713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28431841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1616239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1616239.28430841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
