<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_22_1412234</id>
	<title>Tracking Thieves With 'Find my iPhone'</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1245683460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader wrote in to say <i>"A friend of mine who just got an iPhone 3GS and has Mobile Me just used the "Find my iPhone" feature to track down his lost and subsequently stolen iPhone. This story involves three nerds wandering sketchy streets with a MacBook, and ends with <a href="http://happywaffle.livejournal.com/5890.html">a confrontation at a bus stop</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader wrote in to say " A friend of mine who just got an iPhone 3GS and has Mobile Me just used the " Find my iPhone " feature to track down his lost and subsequently stolen iPhone .
This story involves three nerds wandering sketchy streets with a MacBook , and ends with a confrontation at a bus stop .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader wrote in to say "A friend of mine who just got an iPhone 3GS and has Mobile Me just used the "Find my iPhone" feature to track down his lost and subsequently stolen iPhone.
This story involves three nerds wandering sketchy streets with a MacBook, and ends with a confrontation at a bus stop.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28443011</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245786900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First you download the app...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First you download the app.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First you download the app...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425939</id>
	<title>Didn't Take Long</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1245698520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure didn't take this guy long to lose his new phone.<br> <br>
In fact, it's a very suspiciously short amount of time to have lost it in *snif* *snif*.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure did n't take this guy long to lose his new phone .
In fact , it 's a very suspiciously short amount of time to have lost it in * snif * * snif * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure didn't take this guy long to lose his new phone.
In fact, it's a very suspiciously short amount of time to have lost it in *snif* *snif*.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434195</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's another quote for you.</p><p>"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men try to do something dangerous without the necessary tools and get fucked up."</p><p>There is no cowardice in knowing your limits and not stepping into a situation, undefended, where you can be hurt or killed. That's called intelligence, not cowardice.</p><p>What you do is come back with some sort of protection and then approach the guy who stole your iPhone. It's just common sense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's another quote for you .
" All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men try to do something dangerous without the necessary tools and get fucked up .
" There is no cowardice in knowing your limits and not stepping into a situation , undefended , where you can be hurt or killed .
That 's called intelligence , not cowardice.What you do is come back with some sort of protection and then approach the guy who stole your iPhone .
It 's just common sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's another quote for you.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men try to do something dangerous without the necessary tools and get fucked up.
"There is no cowardice in knowing your limits and not stepping into a situation, undefended, where you can be hurt or killed.
That's called intelligence, not cowardice.What you do is come back with some sort of protection and then approach the guy who stole your iPhone.
It's just common sense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440047</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245776520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet the next time the old gun ownership debate comes up, we'll be repeatedly told (most likely by the same people) that you have as much chance to be shot in the UK as you do in the US, regardless of gun laws.</p><p>Yet somehow I can walk the streets of my city centre and the surrounding areas every night of the week without once hearing a gunshot, let alone seeing anyone get shot, and only have to worry about physical assault in the space between 3am and 4am on a friday night.</p><p>So which is it - are the average city dwelling American as safe as we Brits, or not?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet the next time the old gun ownership debate comes up , we 'll be repeatedly told ( most likely by the same people ) that you have as much chance to be shot in the UK as you do in the US , regardless of gun laws.Yet somehow I can walk the streets of my city centre and the surrounding areas every night of the week without once hearing a gunshot , let alone seeing anyone get shot , and only have to worry about physical assault in the space between 3am and 4am on a friday night.So which is it - are the average city dwelling American as safe as we Brits , or not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet the next time the old gun ownership debate comes up, we'll be repeatedly told (most likely by the same people) that you have as much chance to be shot in the UK as you do in the US, regardless of gun laws.Yet somehow I can walk the streets of my city centre and the surrounding areas every night of the week without once hearing a gunshot, let alone seeing anyone get shot, and only have to worry about physical assault in the space between 3am and 4am on a friday night.So which is it - are the average city dwelling American as safe as we Brits, or not?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423337</id>
	<title>It can be turned off..</title>
	<author>irchs</author>
	<datestamp>1245689520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Provided that the phone doesn't have a pin lock, the Find My iPhone feature can be disabled in the phones preferences, rendering it useless...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Provided that the phone does n't have a pin lock , the Find My iPhone feature can be disabled in the phones preferences , rendering it useless... : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Provided that the phone doesn't have a pin lock, the Find My iPhone feature can be disabled in the phones preferences, rendering it useless... :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424693</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid (like the rest of life)</title>
	<author>clevergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1245694140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's statistics.

Point #1: Even in those those areas you're wary of, the vast majority of the people are normal decent folks.  Are there scumbags there?  Yes, just like there are in your neighborhood.  Irrational fear of the unknown doesn't help you with the issue at hand.

Point #2: Most thieves are cowards, just like most of everyone else.  The logic in "he picked up a phone that had been left on a table when no one was looking, thus he could be a recently paroled dangerous thug" just doesn't ring true for me.  Possible, yes.  Likely, no.

Is there a chance you'd get the beat down (or brutally killed) for trying to retrieve your phone?  Sure!

Is there a chance you'll get t-boned on your way home from work tonight and have your guts splashed across an intersection?  Of course.

Why don't you crawl under your desk and go to sleep at the office tonight instead of driving home-- I mean, come on...is it really worth the risk??  Sounds dangerous and stupid to me.   It's clearly more safe to be a perpetual victim of what might happen, likely or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's statistics .
Point # 1 : Even in those those areas you 're wary of , the vast majority of the people are normal decent folks .
Are there scumbags there ?
Yes , just like there are in your neighborhood .
Irrational fear of the unknown does n't help you with the issue at hand .
Point # 2 : Most thieves are cowards , just like most of everyone else .
The logic in " he picked up a phone that had been left on a table when no one was looking , thus he could be a recently paroled dangerous thug " just does n't ring true for me .
Possible , yes .
Likely , no .
Is there a chance you 'd get the beat down ( or brutally killed ) for trying to retrieve your phone ?
Sure ! Is there a chance you 'll get t-boned on your way home from work tonight and have your guts splashed across an intersection ?
Of course .
Why do n't you crawl under your desk and go to sleep at the office tonight instead of driving home-- I mean , come on...is it really worth the risk ? ?
Sounds dangerous and stupid to me .
It 's clearly more safe to be a perpetual victim of what might happen , likely or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's statistics.
Point #1: Even in those those areas you're wary of, the vast majority of the people are normal decent folks.
Are there scumbags there?
Yes, just like there are in your neighborhood.
Irrational fear of the unknown doesn't help you with the issue at hand.
Point #2: Most thieves are cowards, just like most of everyone else.
The logic in "he picked up a phone that had been left on a table when no one was looking, thus he could be a recently paroled dangerous thug" just doesn't ring true for me.
Possible, yes.
Likely, no.
Is there a chance you'd get the beat down (or brutally killed) for trying to retrieve your phone?
Sure!

Is there a chance you'll get t-boned on your way home from work tonight and have your guts splashed across an intersection?
Of course.
Why don't you crawl under your desk and go to sleep at the office tonight instead of driving home-- I mean, come on...is it really worth the risk??
Sounds dangerous and stupid to me.
It's clearly more safe to be a perpetual victim of what might happen, likely or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424549</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>I am sure they have had their asses handed to them AND have dealt some serious ass whooping before...  <b>in WoW</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not trying to be a troll here , but I 'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before .
I am sure they have had their asses handed to them AND have dealt some serious ass whooping before... in WoW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.
I am sure they have had their asses handed to them AND have dealt some serious ass whooping before...  in WoW.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423403</id>
	<title>Re:Honkey?</title>
	<author>Volante3192</author>
	<datestamp>1245689760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not?  What's wrong with a little self-depreciating humour now and again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not ?
What 's wrong with a little self-depreciating humour now and again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not?
What's wrong with a little self-depreciating humour now and again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424047</id>
	<title>Re:Single Best Story I have read on Slashdot</title>
	<author>e9th</author>
	<datestamp>1245691860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kudos indeed. s-waffle's UID show he signed up not long after I did, which would make him one hell of a mole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos indeed .
s-waffle 's UID show he signed up not long after I did , which would make him one hell of a mole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos indeed.
s-waffle's UID show he signed up not long after I did, which would make him one hell of a mole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426469</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Memo to self:  nice try throwing the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. masses off with a second user id.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Memo to self : nice try throwing the / .
masses off with a second user id .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Memo to self:  nice try throwing the /.
masses off with a second user id.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424535</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes that's true, you didn't slur anyone in real life. But in the PC world of the liberals, just the mention of another ethnicity by a Caucasian is a slur. See, as a white guy, you're an oppressor, so you have no right to mention another's ethnicity.<br> <br>But, "those people" can refer to you in any number of ways and that's OK.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes that 's true , you did n't slur anyone in real life .
But in the PC world of the liberals , just the mention of another ethnicity by a Caucasian is a slur .
See , as a white guy , you 're an oppressor , so you have no right to mention another 's ethnicity .
But , " those people " can refer to you in any number of ways and that 's OK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes that's true, you didn't slur anyone in real life.
But in the PC world of the liberals, just the mention of another ethnicity by a Caucasian is a slur.
See, as a white guy, you're an oppressor, so you have no right to mention another's ethnicity.
But, "those people" can refer to you in any number of ways and that's OK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424601</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't matter, have to stand up for yourself</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't matter , have to stand up for yourself</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't matter, have to stand up for yourself</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426283</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1245699780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I live near Miami. I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida. They responded to the effect, "How can you live in Miami? Don't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing, ganster thug rapists?"</i></p><p>Did you then clarify that <i>near</i> Miami is not <i>in</i> Miami?</p><p>Reminds me of the kids in NoVa.. "Yo dawg, we live in the Murder Capital of the World.  This shit be hard<i>core</i>!"</p><p>"Dude, you live in Fairfax."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live near Miami .
I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida .
They responded to the effect , " How can you live in Miami ?
Do n't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing , ganster thug rapists ?
" Did you then clarify that near Miami is not in Miami ? Reminds me of the kids in NoVa.. " Yo dawg , we live in the Murder Capital of the World .
This shit be hardcore !
" " Dude , you live in Fairfax .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live near Miami.
I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida.
They responded to the effect, "How can you live in Miami?
Don't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing, ganster thug rapists?
"Did you then clarify that near Miami is not in Miami?Reminds me of the kids in NoVa.. "Yo dawg, we live in the Murder Capital of the World.
This shit be hardcore!
""Dude, you live in Fairfax.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</id>
	<title>Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245687240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well.  Yes, I know I'm a terrible person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well .
Yes , I know I 'm a terrible person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well.
Yes, I know I'm a terrible person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Author here.
<br> <br>
First, I was being self-deprecating, since I felt like the opposite of a badass iPhone tracker as we walked up and down this block.
<br> <br>
Second, ethnicity is completely relevant to the story in that we were out of our element and quite visible prowling up and down the street with our laptop. The stares of the local residents confirmed this.
<br> <br>
Third, other than the self-deprecation, I don't believe I said a single negative thing about anyone's race.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Author here .
First , I was being self-deprecating , since I felt like the opposite of a badass iPhone tracker as we walked up and down this block .
Second , ethnicity is completely relevant to the story in that we were out of our element and quite visible prowling up and down the street with our laptop .
The stares of the local residents confirmed this .
Third , other than the self-deprecation , I do n't believe I said a single negative thing about anyone 's race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Author here.
First, I was being self-deprecating, since I felt like the opposite of a badass iPhone tracker as we walked up and down this block.
Second, ethnicity is completely relevant to the story in that we were out of our element and quite visible prowling up and down the street with our laptop.
The stares of the local residents confirmed this.
Third, other than the self-deprecation, I don't believe I said a single negative thing about anyone's race.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436077</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245748920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Problem:
Police don't give a fuck</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem : Police do n't give a fuck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem:
Police don't give a fuck</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid."</p><p>Really? If that were the case, then we've already lost. Our country is filled with cowardice, like yours. As the powers continue to take away your freedoms, one at a time, in the name of peace and security, you sit back and cower in fear of losing more if you "act up" and stand up for yourself.</p><p>I'm reminded of the quote<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)</p><p>So, do nothing, be nothing, as cowards usually are. Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward, you have contributed to exactly what you fear most.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid. " Really ?
If that were the case , then we 've already lost .
Our country is filled with cowardice , like yours .
As the powers continue to take away your freedoms , one at a time , in the name of peace and security , you sit back and cower in fear of losing more if you " act up " and stand up for yourself.I 'm reminded of the quote ....All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing .
" ( Edmund Burke ) So , do nothing , be nothing , as cowards usually are .
Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward , you have contributed to exactly what you fear most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid."Really?
If that were the case, then we've already lost.
Our country is filled with cowardice, like yours.
As the powers continue to take away your freedoms, one at a time, in the name of peace and security, you sit back and cower in fear of losing more if you "act up" and stand up for yourself.I'm reminded of the quote ....All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
" (Edmund Burke)So, do nothing, be nothing, as cowards usually are.
Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward, you have contributed to exactly what you fear most.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424659</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1245693900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>While on a business trip to New York, actually just Long Island, I drove back to the airport down the Long Island Expressway.  My Memory is not exact here but I needed to re-fill the rental car with gas and never having been in this particular area before I waited until I could see a gas station from the road.  That was not an easy task but I think I was somewhere in Queens (near Kennedy airport but not too close) when I pulled off the road.  Assuming that there was no danger of violence I pulled into said gas station and when I went to pay for the gas I was told by the attendant, "get your gas and get the hell out of here fast if you want to keep your hide in one piece" , and so I did and so I did.  But making assumptions of no danger of violence has gotten people into trouble that don't know the character of the neighborhood in L.A , Louisiana, Alabama and other places as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While on a business trip to New York , actually just Long Island , I drove back to the airport down the Long Island Expressway .
My Memory is not exact here but I needed to re-fill the rental car with gas and never having been in this particular area before I waited until I could see a gas station from the road .
That was not an easy task but I think I was somewhere in Queens ( near Kennedy airport but not too close ) when I pulled off the road .
Assuming that there was no danger of violence I pulled into said gas station and when I went to pay for the gas I was told by the attendant , " get your gas and get the hell out of here fast if you want to keep your hide in one piece " , and so I did and so I did .
But making assumptions of no danger of violence has gotten people into trouble that do n't know the character of the neighborhood in L.A , Louisiana , Alabama and other places as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While on a business trip to New York, actually just Long Island, I drove back to the airport down the Long Island Expressway.
My Memory is not exact here but I needed to re-fill the rental car with gas and never having been in this particular area before I waited until I could see a gas station from the road.
That was not an easy task but I think I was somewhere in Queens (near Kennedy airport but not too close) when I pulled off the road.
Assuming that there was no danger of violence I pulled into said gas station and when I went to pay for the gas I was told by the attendant, "get your gas and get the hell out of here fast if you want to keep your hide in one piece" , and so I did and so I did.
But making assumptions of no danger of violence has gotten people into trouble that don't know the character of the neighborhood in L.A , Louisiana, Alabama and other places as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1245689700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How much juice does one of these things consume??</p></div><p>I've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still won't turn on. I've got to run to the store to get more- I think I'll try grapefruit this time. I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much juice does one of these things consume ?
? I 've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still wo n't turn on .
I 've got to run to the store to get more- I think I 'll try grapefruit this time .
I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much juice does one of these things consume?
?I've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still won't turn on.
I've got to run to the store to get more- I think I'll try grapefruit this time.
I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425869</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>nuckfuts</author>
	<datestamp>1245698280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you, because they won't, unless it is convenient to them to do so.</p><p>I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway.</p></div><p>I take it you consider yourself some kind of tough guy. You know how to fight and are possibly armed. You're not going to take shit from any lowlife street thug.</p><p>You are also an idiot. Here's why: </p><ul>
  <li>Only an idiot would advocate the kind of vigilantism you're describing,
    and believe that society would be better if more citizens were weapon-toting
    tough guys like you.</li><li>Your capitalization of the word OFF suggests you are using it in the colloquial
    sense, meaning to KILL someone. Perhaps you are more than just an idiot. Perhaps
    you are a homicidal idiot.</li><li>There are people walking the streets of every city who are crazy. When you
    confront a stranger you have no way of knowing who you are dealing with. The
    person you confront could be armed themselves, and mentally deranged enough
    to use their weapon for no good reason at all. </li></ul><p>I've been in altercations with people who were clearly prepared to use a level of violence far beyond what the situation called for - people who were clearly not rational. It's not cowardly to avoid such confrontations. It's the intelligent thing to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you , because they wo n't , unless it is convenient to them to do so.I would confront the asshole , and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone , then that person should be OFF the streets anyway.I take it you consider yourself some kind of tough guy .
You know how to fight and are possibly armed .
You 're not going to take shit from any lowlife street thug.You are also an idiot .
Here 's why : Only an idiot would advocate the kind of vigilantism you 're describing , and believe that society would be better if more citizens were weapon-toting tough guys like you.Your capitalization of the word OFF suggests you are using it in the colloquial sense , meaning to KILL someone .
Perhaps you are more than just an idiot .
Perhaps you are a homicidal idiot.There are people walking the streets of every city who are crazy .
When you confront a stranger you have no way of knowing who you are dealing with .
The person you confront could be armed themselves , and mentally deranged enough to use their weapon for no good reason at all .
I 've been in altercations with people who were clearly prepared to use a level of violence far beyond what the situation called for - people who were clearly not rational .
It 's not cowardly to avoid such confrontations .
It 's the intelligent thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you, because they won't, unless it is convenient to them to do so.I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway.I take it you consider yourself some kind of tough guy.
You know how to fight and are possibly armed.
You're not going to take shit from any lowlife street thug.You are also an idiot.
Here's why: 
  Only an idiot would advocate the kind of vigilantism you're describing,
    and believe that society would be better if more citizens were weapon-toting
    tough guys like you.Your capitalization of the word OFF suggests you are using it in the colloquial
    sense, meaning to KILL someone.
Perhaps you are more than just an idiot.
Perhaps
    you are a homicidal idiot.There are people walking the streets of every city who are crazy.
When you
    confront a stranger you have no way of knowing who you are dealing with.
The
    person you confront could be armed themselves, and mentally deranged enough
    to use their weapon for no good reason at all.
I've been in altercations with people who were clearly prepared to use a level of violence far beyond what the situation called for - people who were clearly not rational.
It's not cowardly to avoid such confrontations.
It's the intelligent thing to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422815</id>
	<title>Fiund my iPhone, Now Go Get It</title>
	<author>rodrigoandrade</author>
	<datestamp>1245687660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, the tech works alright, until you find out it's in the hands of a drug lord in the ghetto. Go get it tiger!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the tech works alright , until you find out it 's in the hands of a drug lord in the ghetto .
Go get it tiger !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the tech works alright, until you find out it's in the hands of a drug lord in the ghetto.
Go get it tiger!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1245692760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live near Miami. I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida. They responded to the effect, "How can you live in Miami?  Don't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing, ganster thug rapists?"</p><p>Recently in Philly, driving along one absolutely normal looking city block, my friends said remarked that they were surprised that people were walking around *at night* in this warzone.</p><p>It's one thing to be careless but this irrational fear of cities is mindboggling.</p><p>To see real urban ganglands, you need to walk through the gritty Weston neighborhood along the I75 corridor near the 'Glades.  Some real thugs hang out here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live near Miami .
I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida .
They responded to the effect , " How can you live in Miami ?
Do n't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing , ganster thug rapists ?
" Recently in Philly , driving along one absolutely normal looking city block , my friends said remarked that they were surprised that people were walking around * at night * in this warzone.It 's one thing to be careless but this irrational fear of cities is mindboggling.To see real urban ganglands , you need to walk through the gritty Weston neighborhood along the I75 corridor near the 'Glades .
Some real thugs hang out here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live near Miami.
I remember once telling my cousins in the UK that I really enjoyed Florida.
They responded to the effect, "How can you live in Miami?
Don't you worry about the assault rifle wielding drug dealing, ganster thug rapists?
"Recently in Philly, driving along one absolutely normal looking city block, my friends said remarked that they were surprised that people were walking around *at night* in this warzone.It's one thing to be careless but this irrational fear of cities is mindboggling.To see real urban ganglands, you need to walk through the gritty Weston neighborhood along the I75 corridor near the 'Glades.
Some real thugs hang out here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425061</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very true.</p><p>you know, all whites, blacks and hispanics are all 100\% the same.</p><p>The problem is money...   Poor black area?  lots of crooks.   Poor hispanic area?  lots of crooks.   Poor white area? lots of scumbags and cars up on blocks.</p><p>Heres' the difference...</p><p>Blacks and hispanics choose inner city for their poor areas.   Whites choose trailer parks and the country for their poor areas.</p><p>they all speak like uneducated morons, just with different accents.  Except for the ones that have 1/2 a brain and want to get the hell out of the self destructive culture they live in and better them selves with college.</p><p>Blacks get called "acting white" when they get good grades or speak clear english,  Hispanics get the same.</p><p>Poor white kids simply get beaten and sent to buy more beer and smokes for their deadbeat father.</p><p>Poor people steal, rich people have iphones.</p><p>It's an us and them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very true.you know , all whites , blacks and hispanics are all 100 \ % the same.The problem is money... Poor black area ?
lots of crooks .
Poor hispanic area ?
lots of crooks .
Poor white area ?
lots of scumbags and cars up on blocks.Heres ' the difference...Blacks and hispanics choose inner city for their poor areas .
Whites choose trailer parks and the country for their poor areas.they all speak like uneducated morons , just with different accents .
Except for the ones that have 1/2 a brain and want to get the hell out of the self destructive culture they live in and better them selves with college.Blacks get called " acting white " when they get good grades or speak clear english , Hispanics get the same.Poor white kids simply get beaten and sent to buy more beer and smokes for their deadbeat father.Poor people steal , rich people have iphones.It 's an us and them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very true.you know, all whites, blacks and hispanics are all 100\% the same.The problem is money...   Poor black area?
lots of crooks.
Poor hispanic area?
lots of crooks.
Poor white area?
lots of scumbags and cars up on blocks.Heres' the difference...Blacks and hispanics choose inner city for their poor areas.
Whites choose trailer parks and the country for their poor areas.they all speak like uneducated morons, just with different accents.
Except for the ones that have 1/2 a brain and want to get the hell out of the self destructive culture they live in and better them selves with college.Blacks get called "acting white" when they get good grades or speak clear english,  Hispanics get the same.Poor white kids simply get beaten and sent to buy more beer and smokes for their deadbeat father.Poor people steal, rich people have iphones.It's an us and them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424465</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1245693420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OP got really lucky this time. I'm *really* glad that he got his phone back, as that's a rare occurrence with high-tech toys in a big city, but even a half-witted thief would have at least turned the phone OFF.
<br> <br>
Most thieves usually flip stolen goods anyway, so they would have no reason to use it until it times to clean it up and sell it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OP got really lucky this time .
I 'm * really * glad that he got his phone back , as that 's a rare occurrence with high-tech toys in a big city , but even a half-witted thief would have at least turned the phone OFF .
Most thieves usually flip stolen goods anyway , so they would have no reason to use it until it times to clean it up and sell it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OP got really lucky this time.
I'm *really* glad that he got his phone back, as that's a rare occurrence with high-tech toys in a big city, but even a half-witted thief would have at least turned the phone OFF.
Most thieves usually flip stolen goods anyway, so they would have no reason to use it until it times to clean it up and sell it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425521</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1245696900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the personal touch you only get with hired goons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the personal touch you only get with hired goons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the personal touch you only get with hired goons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423071</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weird.  Most of the geeks I know are far from defenseless.</p><p>-Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weird .
Most of the geeks I know are far from defenseless.-Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weird.
Most of the geeks I know are far from defenseless.-Peter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425005</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245695220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might like the song "Everyone's a Little Bit Racist" from the musical Avenue Q.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might like the song " Everyone 's a Little Bit Racist " from the musical Avenue Q .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might like the song "Everyone's a Little Bit Racist" from the musical Avenue Q.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423601</id>
	<title>Am I the only one that wonders</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1245690300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... WTF is a Lego convention?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... WTF is a Lego convention ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... WTF is a Lego convention?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423547</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245690120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are the one drawing attention to ethnicity. The are different races accept it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are the one drawing attention to ethnicity .
The are different races accept it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are the one drawing attention to ethnicity.
The are different races accept it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426083</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245699060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Me up all night hugging me horn, for porn, porn, porn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Me up all night hugging me horn , for porn , porn , porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me up all night hugging me horn, for porn, porn, porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423931</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1245691560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Luckily, your shiny, new, five-finger-discounted phone will be <i>really</i> useful without its radio...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Luckily , your shiny , new , five-finger-discounted phone will be really useful without its radio.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luckily, your shiny, new, five-finger-discounted phone will be really useful without its radio...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424473</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Markemp</author>
	<datestamp>1245693480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He should have asked the thief's address and promised to send him the reward money of $500 to it as soon as he can get to an ATM machine.  Then when he had the address in hand, he should have left with the joke:  "How do you keep an asshole in suspense?"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Problem is, I never think of good lines like that during the moment.  It's always "I shoulda done that..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>He should have asked the thief 's address and promised to send him the reward money of $ 500 to it as soon as he can get to an ATM machine .
Then when he had the address in hand , he should have left with the joke : " How do you keep an asshole in suspense ?
" ... Problem is , I never think of good lines like that during the moment .
It 's always " I shoulda done that... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should have asked the thief's address and promised to send him the reward money of $500 to it as soon as he can get to an ATM machine.
Then when he had the address in hand, he should have left with the joke:  "How do you keep an asshole in suspense?
" ... Problem is, I never think of good lines like that during the moment.
It's always "I shoulda done that..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426119</id>
	<title>Option to Self-Destruct the Unit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245699180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you can force the data on the phone to self-destruct, but why give them perp a free phone? I would rather have the option to turn the iPhone into a melted puddle of slag if the guy/gal wouldn't return it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you can force the data on the phone to self-destruct , but why give them perp a free phone ?
I would rather have the option to turn the iPhone into a melted puddle of slag if the guy/gal would n't return it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you can force the data on the phone to self-destruct, but why give them perp a free phone?
I would rather have the option to turn the iPhone into a melted puddle of slag if the guy/gal wouldn't return it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437015</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245760380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a poor choice to coerce something from someone without knowing anything about them and not having any methods of protecting yourself if it does turn sour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a poor choice to coerce something from someone without knowing anything about them and not having any methods of protecting yourself if it does turn sour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a poor choice to coerce something from someone without knowing anything about them and not having any methods of protecting yourself if it does turn sour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424845</id>
	<title>people don't trace SIMs, phone companies do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chances are, the phone company isn't going to tell you where the SIM has been used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chances are , the phone company is n't going to tell you where the SIM has been used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chances are, the phone company isn't going to tell you where the SIM has been used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423285</id>
	<title>Re:Single Best Story I have read on Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just so the G1 doesn't feel left out, this is very possible and free on an Android phone. With Latitude enabled on the phone it is simply a matter of signing into iGoogle and checking your Latitude location.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just so the G1 does n't feel left out , this is very possible and free on an Android phone .
With Latitude enabled on the phone it is simply a matter of signing into iGoogle and checking your Latitude location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just so the G1 doesn't feel left out, this is very possible and free on an Android phone.
With Latitude enabled on the phone it is simply a matter of signing into iGoogle and checking your Latitude location.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422935</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1245688140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They might be speaking of the battery usage of GPS rather than battery use of the phone in general.  If they were constantly looking for the phone via GPS I can understand their amazement.  Try using a handheld GPS device and many of them crap out within hours without a plugin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They might be speaking of the battery usage of GPS rather than battery use of the phone in general .
If they were constantly looking for the phone via GPS I can understand their amazement .
Try using a handheld GPS device and many of them crap out within hours without a plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They might be speaking of the battery usage of GPS rather than battery use of the phone in general.
If they were constantly looking for the phone via GPS I can understand their amazement.
Try using a handheld GPS device and many of them crap out within hours without a plugin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434763</id>
	<title>Video podcast of this story</title>
	<author>apcyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is also on the podcast <a href="http://www.geekbrief.tv/gbtv-582-a-bedtime-story" title="geekbrief.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekbrief.tv/gbtv-582-a-bedtime-story</a> [geekbrief.tv]
Good story and good service from what i saw.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is also on the podcast http : //www.geekbrief.tv/gbtv-582-a-bedtime-story [ geekbrief.tv ] Good story and good service from what i saw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is also on the podcast http://www.geekbrief.tv/gbtv-582-a-bedtime-story [geekbrief.tv]
Good story and good service from what i saw.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423271</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tend to agree with you, but I live in Chicago a few files from the area he's talking about. I been there a few times. Generally in our big cities and Chicago for sure, race or ethnicity can matter - more so in some neighborhoods than in others.  It's a fact relevant to the story.  I suppose he dwelled on it a bit to heighten the drama for his readers - playing on their own fears/prejudices.  If he were a black man writing about 3 black geeks in a white or hispanic neighborhood would you have been offended?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tend to agree with you , but I live in Chicago a few files from the area he 's talking about .
I been there a few times .
Generally in our big cities and Chicago for sure , race or ethnicity can matter - more so in some neighborhoods than in others .
It 's a fact relevant to the story .
I suppose he dwelled on it a bit to heighten the drama for his readers - playing on their own fears/prejudices .
If he were a black man writing about 3 black geeks in a white or hispanic neighborhood would you have been offended ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tend to agree with you, but I live in Chicago a few files from the area he's talking about.
I been there a few times.
Generally in our big cities and Chicago for sure, race or ethnicity can matter - more so in some neighborhoods than in others.
It's a fact relevant to the story.
I suppose he dwelled on it a bit to heighten the drama for his readers - playing on their own fears/prejudices.
If he were a black man writing about 3 black geeks in a white or hispanic neighborhood would you have been offended?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426347</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good riddance</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good riddance</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good riddance</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427759</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245661320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course. Baltimore is full of niggers... think about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course .
Baltimore is full of niggers... think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course.
Baltimore is full of niggers... think about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427585</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1245703920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with that is that it ignores the higher population density of cities. A city with 50 times as much crime per year per square kilometer is still safer if it has 60 times as many people in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with that is that it ignores the higher population density of cities .
A city with 50 times as much crime per year per square kilometer is still safer if it has 60 times as many people in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with that is that it ignores the higher population density of cities.
A city with 50 times as much crime per year per square kilometer is still safer if it has 60 times as many people in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423317</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>JCSoRocks</author>
	<datestamp>1245689460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mom says it's dangerous to leave the basement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mom says it 's dangerous to leave the basement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mom says it's dangerous to leave the basement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425247</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We parked along Medill and hopped out. It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood. On the south side of the street, an outdoor birthday fiesta was convening, and some of the participants eyed us three honkeys questioningly."</p><p>I live about a block from where that party was going on.   Calling that particular portion of  Logan Square a Puerto Rican neighborhood is inaccurate (despite there being a Puerto Rican credit union there, many of my neighbors are from Mexico or are descendants of Swedish and Armenian descent).</p><p>The party that was having a birthday celebration had turned into a street soccer game around 9 PM.  (Did you see the pinata with the big CA on its chest?)  You had jack-shit to fear from that party other than them wondering what the hell good could come from three goofs who clearly didn't live there wandering up and down the street.  Overall crime in that section of Logan Square is pretty low---at the point you passed the birthday party, you were about a block from Goethe Elementary's schoolyard.  You would have raised a few eyebrows---not because you're white ( there were plenty of your cousins around that night, myself included) but because you were clearly doing something strange.  When people who look confused walk through there it's usually to get to the Congress theater, and they may have figured you got a bad batch of X and forgot where your car was parked.</p><p>Honestly, it's a phone.  If you lose it, you lose it.  I see this story as just being a self-congratulatory geekoff.  Had you entered a really, really sketchy neighborhood, I'm sure this story wouldn't have happened--you would have all turned around and walked out before things got weird.  You felt comfortable enough whipping your hardware then, but after the fact, after a couple beers and with a few retellings i'm sure this all sounded like quite the adventure, the skintones of the participants got darker, the streets narrower and your courage only deeper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We parked along Medill and hopped out .
It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood .
On the south side of the street , an outdoor birthday fiesta was convening , and some of the participants eyed us three honkeys questioningly .
" I live about a block from where that party was going on .
Calling that particular portion of Logan Square a Puerto Rican neighborhood is inaccurate ( despite there being a Puerto Rican credit union there , many of my neighbors are from Mexico or are descendants of Swedish and Armenian descent ) .The party that was having a birthday celebration had turned into a street soccer game around 9 PM .
( Did you see the pinata with the big CA on its chest ?
) You had jack-shit to fear from that party other than them wondering what the hell good could come from three goofs who clearly did n't live there wandering up and down the street .
Overall crime in that section of Logan Square is pretty low---at the point you passed the birthday party , you were about a block from Goethe Elementary 's schoolyard .
You would have raised a few eyebrows---not because you 're white ( there were plenty of your cousins around that night , myself included ) but because you were clearly doing something strange .
When people who look confused walk through there it 's usually to get to the Congress theater , and they may have figured you got a bad batch of X and forgot where your car was parked.Honestly , it 's a phone .
If you lose it , you lose it .
I see this story as just being a self-congratulatory geekoff .
Had you entered a really , really sketchy neighborhood , I 'm sure this story would n't have happened--you would have all turned around and walked out before things got weird .
You felt comfortable enough whipping your hardware then , but after the fact , after a couple beers and with a few retellings i 'm sure this all sounded like quite the adventure , the skintones of the participants got darker , the streets narrower and your courage only deeper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We parked along Medill and hopped out.
It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood.
On the south side of the street, an outdoor birthday fiesta was convening, and some of the participants eyed us three honkeys questioningly.
"I live about a block from where that party was going on.
Calling that particular portion of  Logan Square a Puerto Rican neighborhood is inaccurate (despite there being a Puerto Rican credit union there, many of my neighbors are from Mexico or are descendants of Swedish and Armenian descent).The party that was having a birthday celebration had turned into a street soccer game around 9 PM.
(Did you see the pinata with the big CA on its chest?
)  You had jack-shit to fear from that party other than them wondering what the hell good could come from three goofs who clearly didn't live there wandering up and down the street.
Overall crime in that section of Logan Square is pretty low---at the point you passed the birthday party, you were about a block from Goethe Elementary's schoolyard.
You would have raised a few eyebrows---not because you're white ( there were plenty of your cousins around that night, myself included) but because you were clearly doing something strange.
When people who look confused walk through there it's usually to get to the Congress theater, and they may have figured you got a bad batch of X and forgot where your car was parked.Honestly, it's a phone.
If you lose it, you lose it.
I see this story as just being a self-congratulatory geekoff.
Had you entered a really, really sketchy neighborhood, I'm sure this story wouldn't have happened--you would have all turned around and walked out before things got weird.
You felt comfortable enough whipping your hardware then, but after the fact, after a couple beers and with a few retellings i'm sure this all sounded like quite the adventure, the skintones of the participants got darker, the streets narrower and your courage only deeper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423477</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1245689880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-1 not geeky enough.</p><p>A small, portable Faraday cage should do the trick until you're in the clear, when you can take the appropriate steps to make sure the device can't be tracked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 not geeky enough.A small , portable Faraday cage should do the trick until you 're in the clear , when you can take the appropriate steps to make sure the device ca n't be tracked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1 not geeky enough.A small, portable Faraday cage should do the trick until you're in the clear, when you can take the appropriate steps to make sure the device can't be tracked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428067</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245662340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.</p></div><p>I think ou are settling for too little. In the current economic scenario, you could get much more for $500 than just a violent beating at the hands of a street thug.<br>Ask any local goon near your steet corner on how to best invest your $500.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.I think ou are settling for too little .
In the current economic scenario , you could get much more for $ 500 than just a violent beating at the hands of a street thug.Ask any local goon near your steet corner on how to best invest your $ 500 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.I think ou are settling for too little.
In the current economic scenario, you could get much more for $500 than just a violent beating at the hands of a street thug.Ask any local goon near your steet corner on how to best invest your $500.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437705</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245766140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)</p></div><p>Where in the your parent's post did it advocate doing nothing?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing .
" ( Edmund Burke ) Where in the your parent 's post did it advocate doing nothing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
" (Edmund Burke)Where in the your parent's post did it advocate doing nothing?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423373</id>
	<title>Re:Single Best Story I have read on Slashdot</title>
	<author>moon3</author>
	<datestamp>1245689640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, and kudos to Apple marketing team.
<br> <br>
I down want to tarnish your enthusiasm for the
story, but it has all the signs of an intended viral, paid up by Apple marketing. Do not forget all the stunts they pulled. I would say, 10\% this is a genuine story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , and kudos to Apple marketing team .
I down want to tarnish your enthusiasm for the story , but it has all the signs of an intended viral , paid up by Apple marketing .
Do not forget all the stunts they pulled .
I would say , 10 \ % this is a genuine story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, and kudos to Apple marketing team.
I down want to tarnish your enthusiasm for the
story, but it has all the signs of an intended viral, paid up by Apple marketing.
Do not forget all the stunts they pulled.
I would say, 10\% this is a genuine story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423951</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>flibuste</author>
	<datestamp>1245691620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And what if he was simply someone who can't afford an IPhone, living in a poor area of town and not being as rich as the 3 kids with their laptop and their mobile phones, and with nothing else to attack people with than a bus ticket?
<br>
Danger starts with paranoia: in your head. The world is much less scary than what people have you believe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And what if he was simply someone who ca n't afford an IPhone , living in a poor area of town and not being as rich as the 3 kids with their laptop and their mobile phones , and with nothing else to attack people with than a bus ticket ?
Danger starts with paranoia : in your head .
The world is much less scary than what people have you believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what if he was simply someone who can't afford an IPhone, living in a poor area of town and not being as rich as the 3 kids with their laptop and their mobile phones, and with nothing else to attack people with than a bus ticket?
Danger starts with paranoia: in your head.
The world is much less scary than what people have you believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435259</id>
	<title>I know the feeling.. but wasn't so lucky</title>
	<author>JonZaninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245697200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recently had my phone stolen, but sadly didn't have Google Locator on it. My new phone (Blackberry storm) has it, but it sucks that unless the actual Google Maps app has main focus, it doesn't give detailed location, only a 100 yard + circle.

I understand they do this to save power, but it would be absolutely awesome if you could send a signal through Google maps to tell it to turn on detailed location, using a secret pin or something so only you could do it.

I never got my phone back and lost a 2 gig memory card with pictures of my wife and son on it, of everything that was stolen, that was the worst part.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently had my phone stolen , but sadly did n't have Google Locator on it .
My new phone ( Blackberry storm ) has it , but it sucks that unless the actual Google Maps app has main focus , it does n't give detailed location , only a 100 yard + circle .
I understand they do this to save power , but it would be absolutely awesome if you could send a signal through Google maps to tell it to turn on detailed location , using a secret pin or something so only you could do it .
I never got my phone back and lost a 2 gig memory card with pictures of my wife and son on it , of everything that was stolen , that was the worst part .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently had my phone stolen, but sadly didn't have Google Locator on it.
My new phone (Blackberry storm) has it, but it sucks that unless the actual Google Maps app has main focus, it doesn't give detailed location, only a 100 yard + circle.
I understand they do this to save power, but it would be absolutely awesome if you could send a signal through Google maps to tell it to turn on detailed location, using a secret pin or something so only you could do it.
I never got my phone back and lost a 2 gig memory card with pictures of my wife and son on it, of everything that was stolen, that was the worst part.
:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427073</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1245702600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He might not just have a macbook.  He could have his own Android with him.</p><p>Would you REALLY want to face some geek's GIMP?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He might not just have a macbook .
He could have his own Android with him.Would you REALLY want to face some geek 's GIMP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He might not just have a macbook.
He could have his own Android with him.Would you REALLY want to face some geek's GIMP?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437729</id>
	<title>Oh noes!</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1245766260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG, it's Politically Correctness Gone Mad!</p><p>Someone call the Daily Mail!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG , it 's Politically Correctness Gone Mad ! Someone call the Daily Mail !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG, it's Politically Correctness Gone Mad!Someone call the Daily Mail!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423135</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>happywaffle</author>
	<datestamp>1245688860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd been using it all day the day before, so its battery was already pretty low. So, it was bound to hit zero at some point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd been using it all day the day before , so its battery was already pretty low .
So , it was bound to hit zero at some point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd been using it all day the day before, so its battery was already pretty low.
So, it was bound to hit zero at some point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435495</id>
	<title>cute</title>
	<author>grrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1245699300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I wuv you, iPhone" ahaha so adorable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I wuv you , iPhone " ahaha so adorable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I wuv you, iPhone" ahaha so adorable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28438933</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245772200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, look at the Internet Tough Guy.</p><p>Self-defense is one thing.  Hunting down a criminal for some vigilante street justice is entirely another.  So basically, "courage" means either (1) "willing to get yourself killed over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal", or (2) "willing to kill another human being over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal".  And someone who isn't willing to do either is a coward representing the downfall of civilization.  Right.  You're a regular American hero, tough guy.  At least your kids will know you died defending your iPhone.  That should be some peace for them.  Though I guess you're aiming more for "vigilante superhero executing street filth".  (They don't deserve to live anyway, right?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , look at the Internet Tough Guy.Self-defense is one thing .
Hunting down a criminal for some vigilante street justice is entirely another .
So basically , " courage " means either ( 1 ) " willing to get yourself killed over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal " , or ( 2 ) " willing to kill another human being over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal " .
And someone who is n't willing to do either is a coward representing the downfall of civilization .
Right. You 're a regular American hero , tough guy .
At least your kids will know you died defending your iPhone .
That should be some peace for them .
Though I guess you 're aiming more for " vigilante superhero executing street filth " .
( They do n't deserve to live anyway , right ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, look at the Internet Tough Guy.Self-defense is one thing.
Hunting down a criminal for some vigilante street justice is entirely another.
So basically, "courage" means either (1) "willing to get yourself killed over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal", or (2) "willing to kill another human being over a stylish and overpriced hunk of plastic and metal".
And someone who isn't willing to do either is a coward representing the downfall of civilization.
Right.  You're a regular American hero, tough guy.
At least your kids will know you died defending your iPhone.
That should be some peace for them.
Though I guess you're aiming more for "vigilante superhero executing street filth".
(They don't deserve to live anyway, right?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429211</id>
	<title>It's A Good Story, but...</title>
	<author>SirWraith</author>
	<datestamp>1245666240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A few things about the story...

It starts off linking to the webpages of his "two compadres". The only thing at one website is a link to the TFA, and the other is the homepage of ryandesign.
Ryan, of ryandesign.com, works on MacPorts, and coincidentally has the same name as the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanfschmidt" title="linkedin.com" rel="nofollow">"MacBook Software Manager at Apple Computer"</a> [linkedin.com].
The phone number he gave (512-796-XXXX) is a Sprint exchange from Austin. When he sent the number for the thief to call, it was the same "512-796-XXXX". Did he send his own number for the thief (the one <i>with</i> the phone, to call), or does his friends phone happen to have the same exchange with the same provider in the sane city?

I'm not calling shenanigans on this, I'm just saying... take the story with a grain of salt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A few things about the story.. . It starts off linking to the webpages of his " two compadres " .
The only thing at one website is a link to the TFA , and the other is the homepage of ryandesign .
Ryan , of ryandesign.com , works on MacPorts , and coincidentally has the same name as the " MacBook Software Manager at Apple Computer " [ linkedin.com ] .
The phone number he gave ( 512-796-XXXX ) is a Sprint exchange from Austin .
When he sent the number for the thief to call , it was the same " 512-796-XXXX " .
Did he send his own number for the thief ( the one with the phone , to call ) , or does his friends phone happen to have the same exchange with the same provider in the sane city ?
I 'm not calling shenanigans on this , I 'm just saying... take the story with a grain of salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few things about the story...

It starts off linking to the webpages of his "two compadres".
The only thing at one website is a link to the TFA, and the other is the homepage of ryandesign.
Ryan, of ryandesign.com, works on MacPorts, and coincidentally has the same name as the "MacBook Software Manager at Apple Computer" [linkedin.com].
The phone number he gave (512-796-XXXX) is a Sprint exchange from Austin.
When he sent the number for the thief to call, it was the same "512-796-XXXX".
Did he send his own number for the thief (the one with the phone, to call), or does his friends phone happen to have the same exchange with the same provider in the sane city?
I'm not calling shenanigans on this, I'm just saying... take the story with a grain of salt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28432541</id>
	<title>sprint can do it too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245679200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we used sprint's family locator service to trackdown my daughter's stolen phone. (they were middle school girls.) it works with all our phones and is $5/month for the whole family. it has nice map/satelite overlays. i think verizon has the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we used sprint 's family locator service to trackdown my daughter 's stolen phone .
( they were middle school girls .
) it works with all our phones and is $ 5/month for the whole family .
it has nice map/satelite overlays .
i think verizon has the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we used sprint's family locator service to trackdown my daughter's stolen phone.
(they were middle school girls.
) it works with all our phones and is $5/month for the whole family.
it has nice map/satelite overlays.
i think verizon has the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434149</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</p></div><p>Perhaps they just aren't as naive as you.  <a href="http://crimebaltimore.com/" title="crimebaltimore.com" rel="nofollow">Here's</a> [crimebaltimore.com] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days.  You'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons.  Those are assaults and shootings.  Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that cities aren't overrun with dangerous thugs.  The ghetto is a dangerous place.</p></div><p>Well..thank god they weren't in freaking Baltimore, and they weren't in a ghetto.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.Perhaps they just are n't as naive as you .
Here 's [ crimebaltimore.com ] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days .
You 'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons .
Those are assaults and shootings .
Just because you do n't like it , does n't mean that cities are n't overrun with dangerous thugs .
The ghetto is a dangerous place.Well..thank god they were n't in freaking Baltimore , and they were n't in a ghetto .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.Perhaps they just aren't as naive as you.
Here's [crimebaltimore.com] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days.
You'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons.
Those are assaults and shootings.
Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that cities aren't overrun with dangerous thugs.
The ghetto is a dangerous place.Well..thank god they weren't in freaking Baltimore, and they weren't in a ghetto.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424219</id>
	<title>holy shit +5?   are you kidding?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot must be full of total pussies.   Your fear only serves to enable the crooks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot must be full of total pussies .
Your fear only serves to enable the crooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot must be full of total pussies.
Your fear only serves to enable the crooks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425357</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>mactard</author>
	<datestamp>1245696360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm from Chicago too, and it's not even a bad neighborhood. There are plenty of white yuppies that live right there. There's a difference between walking through a bombed out area and seeing mexicans and flipping out about how it's unsavory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from Chicago too , and it 's not even a bad neighborhood .
There are plenty of white yuppies that live right there .
There 's a difference between walking through a bombed out area and seeing mexicans and flipping out about how it 's unsavory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from Chicago too, and it's not even a bad neighborhood.
There are plenty of white yuppies that live right there.
There's a difference between walking through a bombed out area and seeing mexicans and flipping out about how it's unsavory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1245690060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</i> <br> <br>True, but even so, TFA's author's actions are very much those of an optimist. He could easily have been shot or had the crap kicked out of him.<br> <br>I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are .
True , but even so , TFA 's author 's actions are very much those of an optimist .
He could easily have been shot or had the crap kicked out of him .
I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.
True, but even so, TFA's author's actions are very much those of an optimist.
He could easily have been shot or had the crap kicked out of him.
I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425343</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1245696300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place.</p></div><p>Quite true. We're still trying to get the county sheriff to take reports of some guy jacking off outside kids' bedroom windows seriously.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police.</p></div><p>So, what are they going to do if you take the initiative? File a union grievance? This isn't a joke. The Seattle police did just this when fire department divers would show up at a drowning first and attempt a rescue. Union rules. That's the cops job in this town. Sorry about your kid drowning. The divers were on a negotiated break at the time.
</p><p>Be prepared to defend yourself and your property. The cops aren't 'jack booted thugs'. More like Barney Fife, and the criminals know this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place.Quite true .
We 're still trying to get the county sheriff to take reports of some guy jacking off outside kids ' bedroom windows seriously.Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police.So , what are they going to do if you take the initiative ?
File a union grievance ?
This is n't a joke .
The Seattle police did just this when fire department divers would show up at a drowning first and attempt a rescue .
Union rules .
That 's the cops job in this town .
Sorry about your kid drowning .
The divers were on a negotiated break at the time .
Be prepared to defend yourself and your property .
The cops are n't 'jack booted thugs' .
More like Barney Fife , and the criminals know this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place.Quite true.
We're still trying to get the county sheriff to take reports of some guy jacking off outside kids' bedroom windows seriously.Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police.So, what are they going to do if you take the initiative?
File a union grievance?
This isn't a joke.
The Seattle police did just this when fire department divers would show up at a drowning first and attempt a rescue.
Union rules.
That's the cops job in this town.
Sorry about your kid drowning.
The divers were on a negotiated break at the time.
Be prepared to defend yourself and your property.
The cops aren't 'jack booted thugs'.
More like Barney Fife, and the criminals know this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426063</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245699000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.</p></div><p>Bingo.  No one who addresses himself and his friends as "three skinny white boys" has any concept of reality.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not trying to be a troll here , but I 'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.Bingo .
No one who addresses himself and his friends as " three skinny white boys " has any concept of reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.Bingo.
No one who addresses himself and his friends as "three skinny white boys" has any concept of reality.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436087</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>smiling\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1245748980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I care if my $100 phone is lost or stolen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I care if my $ 100 phone is lost or stolen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I care if my $100 phone is lost or stolen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424569</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Kamineko</author>
	<datestamp>1245693660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would an Altoids tin or a tin of travel sweets work as a Faraday cage?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would an Altoids tin or a tin of travel sweets work as a Faraday cage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would an Altoids tin or a tin of travel sweets work as a Faraday cage?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423617</id>
	<title>Re:Honkey?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245690360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you had to walk through an ethnic neighborhood and started to notice people watching you, most of whom could probably twist you around their little finger without breaking a sweat, you'd probably feel like a honkey too. In other words, out of place, rather uncomfortable, and not willing to stay there any longer than absolutely necessary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you had to walk through an ethnic neighborhood and started to notice people watching you , most of whom could probably twist you around their little finger without breaking a sweat , you 'd probably feel like a honkey too .
In other words , out of place , rather uncomfortable , and not willing to stay there any longer than absolutely necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you had to walk through an ethnic neighborhood and started to notice people watching you, most of whom could probably twist you around their little finger without breaking a sweat, you'd probably feel like a honkey too.
In other words, out of place, rather uncomfortable, and not willing to stay there any longer than absolutely necessary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424067</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Put it in a tin foil bag. That's how they get passed shop security sensors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Put it in a tin foil bag .
That 's how they get passed shop security sensors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put it in a tin foil bag.
That's how they get passed shop security sensors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983</id>
	<title>Beat down</title>
	<author>PeeShootr</author>
	<datestamp>1245688260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.  <br>

It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug .
It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.
It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425363</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1245696360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never actually HAD your ass kicked downtown, have you?  I'm not saying that everytime you go through an urban area it's The Warriors 2009, but seriously, if you think the whole "urban fear" is just an invention, you're simply naive.</p><p>From the article: (the guy was thinking)"You probably think the angels of death have found you."</p><p>No, what crossed my mind was that if he was an actual criminal and not just some opportunistic teen, his thought would be more like "Sweet iPhone, and there are 3 dickweeds running around with a laptop too.  All we have to do is roll them, and we get a laptop as well."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never actually HAD your ass kicked downtown , have you ?
I 'm not saying that everytime you go through an urban area it 's The Warriors 2009 , but seriously , if you think the whole " urban fear " is just an invention , you 're simply naive.From the article : ( the guy was thinking ) " You probably think the angels of death have found you .
" No , what crossed my mind was that if he was an actual criminal and not just some opportunistic teen , his thought would be more like " Sweet iPhone , and there are 3 dickweeds running around with a laptop too .
All we have to do is roll them , and we get a laptop as well .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never actually HAD your ass kicked downtown, have you?
I'm not saying that everytime you go through an urban area it's The Warriors 2009, but seriously, if you think the whole "urban fear" is just an invention, you're simply naive.From the article: (the guy was thinking)"You probably think the angels of death have found you.
"No, what crossed my mind was that if he was an actual criminal and not just some opportunistic teen, his thought would be more like "Sweet iPhone, and there are 3 dickweeds running around with a laptop too.
All we have to do is roll them, and we get a laptop as well.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435885</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Adam Jorgensen</author>
	<datestamp>1245789660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pish pish, US cities? Don't make me laugh?

Try Rio or Johannesburg if you're looking for crime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pish pish , US cities ?
Do n't make me laugh ?
Try Rio or Johannesburg if you 're looking for crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pish pish, US cities?
Don't make me laugh?
Try Rio or Johannesburg if you're looking for crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423081</id>
	<title>Re:Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure who's the bigger idiot, the one you claim is stealing the phones, or you for thinking that most people who steal phones are techies who understand what SIM cards are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure who 's the bigger idiot , the one you claim is stealing the phones , or you for thinking that most people who steal phones are techies who understand what SIM cards are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure who's the bigger idiot, the one you claim is stealing the phones, or you for thinking that most people who steal phones are techies who understand what SIM cards are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435489</id>
	<title>Re:Single Best Story I have read on Slashdot</title>
	<author>iamapizza</author>
	<datestamp>1245699300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going to buy everyone on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. a sarcasm detector for Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to buy everyone on / .
a sarcasm detector for Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to buy everyone on /.
a sarcasm detector for Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426727</id>
	<title>Is there an equivalent utility for Symbian 60?</title>
	<author>badzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1245701400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a Nokia with GPS and I sure would like to be able to track it down if I lose it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Nokia with GPS and I sure would like to be able to track it down if I lose it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Nokia with GPS and I sure would like to be able to track it down if I lose it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424383</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one that wonders</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1245693060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only one that wonders... WTF is a Lego convention?</p></div><p>Fine.  LEGO&reg; convention.  Sheesh, lego snobs and their insistence on all-caps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that wonders... WTF is a Lego convention ? Fine .
LEGO   convention .
Sheesh , lego snobs and their insistence on all-caps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that wonders... WTF is a Lego convention?Fine.
LEGO® convention.
Sheesh, lego snobs and their insistence on all-caps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427483</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245703620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree entirely, and what's more the same people would probably have "not getting your ass kicked" as a reason for not stealing an iPhone as well.  Really, if you had stolen a phone and they were able to track it, I'd say you've got as much a chance of getting your ass kicked as kicking ass.  Particularly if your victim had rounded up a few friends, which is likely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree entirely , and what 's more the same people would probably have " not getting your ass kicked " as a reason for not stealing an iPhone as well .
Really , if you had stolen a phone and they were able to track it , I 'd say you 've got as much a chance of getting your ass kicked as kicking ass .
Particularly if your victim had rounded up a few friends , which is likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree entirely, and what's more the same people would probably have "not getting your ass kicked" as a reason for not stealing an iPhone as well.
Really, if you had stolen a phone and they were able to track it, I'd say you've got as much a chance of getting your ass kicked as kicking ass.
Particularly if your victim had rounded up a few friends, which is likely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>mveloso</author>
	<datestamp>1245687720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440947</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245779820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward, you have contributed to exactly what you fear most.</i></p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as opposed to hiding behind your computer screen in anonymity bragging about what a hero you are?  Or rather what a hero you could be, theoretically, if the situation presented itself, according to yourself.</p><p>What a hypocrite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward , you have contributed to exactly what you fear most .
... as opposed to hiding behind your computer screen in anonymity bragging about what a hero you are ?
Or rather what a hero you could be , theoretically , if the situation presented itself , according to yourself.What a hypocrite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hide behind your computer screen in anonymity whining about how bad the world is knowing that by being a coward, you have contributed to exactly what you fear most.
... as opposed to hiding behind your computer screen in anonymity bragging about what a hero you are?
Or rather what a hero you could be, theoretically, if the situation presented itself, according to yourself.What a hypocrite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422845</id>
	<title>No remote shutoff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245687780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something that occurred to me while reading was that if they hadn't found it, while there is a way to remotely wipe the data there isn't a way to remotely lockdown the phone.<br> <br>

A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too.<br> <br>

Or a remote self-destruct feature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something that occurred to me while reading was that if they had n't found it , while there is a way to remotely wipe the data there is n't a way to remotely lockdown the phone .
A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too .
Or a remote self-destruct feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something that occurred to me while reading was that if they hadn't found it, while there is a way to remotely wipe the data there isn't a way to remotely lockdown the phone.
A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too.
Or a remote self-destruct feature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427493</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>mdarksbane</author>
	<datestamp>1245703680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Armed? You must be kidding, Chicago has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Armed ?
You must be kidding , Chicago has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Armed?
You must be kidding, Chicago has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423797</id>
	<title>Lose $500 AND get the beatdown...sweet!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
You're either a masochist, or poor grammaticist.<p><div class="quote"><p>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 <b>then</b> receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.
<br> <br>
It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're either a masochist , or poor grammaticist.I 'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug .
It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
You're either a masochist, or poor grammaticist.I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.
It was pretty stupid of these guys to go after the phone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>jcnnghm</author>
	<datestamp>1245694620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</p></div><p>Perhaps they just aren't as naive as you.  <a href="http://crimebaltimore.com/" title="crimebaltimore.com">Here's</a> [crimebaltimore.com] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days.  You'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons.  Those are assaults and shootings.  Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that cities aren't overrun with dangerous thugs.  The ghetto is a dangerous place.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.Perhaps they just are n't as naive as you .
Here 's [ crimebaltimore.com ] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days .
You 'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons .
Those are assaults and shootings .
Just because you do n't like it , does n't mean that cities are n't overrun with dangerous thugs .
The ghetto is a dangerous place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.Perhaps they just aren't as naive as you.
Here's [crimebaltimore.com] a neat map showing crime reported in Baltimore over the last 11 days.
You'll notice all the fists and cross hair icons.
Those are assaults and shootings.
Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that cities aren't overrun with dangerous thugs.
The ghetto is a dangerous place.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422931</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>El\_Muerte\_TDS</author>
	<datestamp>1245688140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Based on that statement I'd guess one carton of apple juice a day. At least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on that statement I 'd guess one carton of apple juice a day .
At least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on that statement I'd guess one carton of apple juice a day.
At least.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</id>
	<title>Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245687840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idiot steals phone</p><p>Idiot not keeps using it with the SIM it came with, but also doesn't turn it off, because he is an idiot</p><p>People can track down the phone, because, again, the theif is an idiot.</p><p>Anyone with a clue knows you can trace a stolen SIM. Most people would just toss the SIM the instant they find any phone they did not plan on returning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiot steals phoneIdiot not keeps using it with the SIM it came with , but also does n't turn it off , because he is an idiotPeople can track down the phone , because , again , the theif is an idiot.Anyone with a clue knows you can trace a stolen SIM .
Most people would just toss the SIM the instant they find any phone they did not plan on returning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiot steals phoneIdiot not keeps using it with the SIM it came with, but also doesn't turn it off, because he is an idiotPeople can track down the phone, because, again, the theif is an idiot.Anyone with a clue knows you can trace a stolen SIM.
Most people would just toss the SIM the instant they find any phone they did not plan on returning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429017</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245665520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps Baltimore is not the most representative example here....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Baltimore is not the most representative example here... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Baltimore is not the most representative example here....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423313</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1245689460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's why Steve's slaving away at an iZapper app. It randomly zaps the users with about a thousand volts just to make sure they meant to be holding it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why Steve 's slaving away at an iZapper app .
It randomly zaps the users with about a thousand volts just to make sure they meant to be holding it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why Steve's slaving away at an iZapper app.
It randomly zaps the users with about a thousand volts just to make sure they meant to be holding it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424865</id>
	<title>petty theft- not a mugging</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1245694740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs.</i>

</p><p>The phone was pickpocketed or found on the floor/table.  It wasn't a mugging.  Violent thugs aren't even the ones who mug you.  Violent thugs are the ones who come up behind you, hit you on the head to knock you unconscious / disorient you, and then steal your stuff.

</p><p>The safest thing to do is FIRST file a stolen property report.  Then go hunting.  Stay in your car while tracking the phone, then call the police and tell them you're actively tracking your phone.  As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though, call 911 and talk to the city/town you're in now- and get ready to repeat everything, because police departments suck at talking to each other.

</p><p>Among other things, if the GPS signal says it's in a house and you fill out a theft report, the cops can go in with a search warrant, though good luck trying to get Joe Donut to do that much work unless they think there's a good chance they'll find drugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs .
The phone was pickpocketed or found on the floor/table .
It was n't a mugging .
Violent thugs are n't even the ones who mug you .
Violent thugs are the ones who come up behind you , hit you on the head to knock you unconscious / disorient you , and then steal your stuff .
The safest thing to do is FIRST file a stolen property report .
Then go hunting .
Stay in your car while tracking the phone , then call the police and tell them you 're actively tracking your phone .
As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though , call 911 and talk to the city/town you 're in now- and get ready to repeat everything , because police departments suck at talking to each other .
Among other things , if the GPS signal says it 's in a house and you fill out a theft report , the cops can go in with a search warrant , though good luck trying to get Joe Donut to do that much work unless they think there 's a good chance they 'll find drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs.
The phone was pickpocketed or found on the floor/table.
It wasn't a mugging.
Violent thugs aren't even the ones who mug you.
Violent thugs are the ones who come up behind you, hit you on the head to knock you unconscious / disorient you, and then steal your stuff.
The safest thing to do is FIRST file a stolen property report.
Then go hunting.
Stay in your car while tracking the phone, then call the police and tell them you're actively tracking your phone.
As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though, call 911 and talk to the city/town you're in now- and get ready to repeat everything, because police departments suck at talking to each other.
Among other things, if the GPS signal says it's in a house and you fill out a theft report, the cops can go in with a search warrant, though good luck trying to get Joe Donut to do that much work unless they think there's a good chance they'll find drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427833</id>
	<title>Next time snap a picture</title>
	<author>insomniac8400</author>
	<datestamp>1245661500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As soon as you got the iphone you should secret snap a photo of the guy.  Then go back to where he works and get him fired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As soon as you got the iphone you should secret snap a photo of the guy .
Then go back to where he works and get him fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As soon as you got the iphone you should secret snap a photo of the guy.
Then go back to where he works and get him fired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423325</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1245689520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps he was trying to explain the part of the story where he translated the message into Spanish. Or should he have self-censored that aspect?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he was trying to explain the part of the story where he translated the message into Spanish .
Or should he have self-censored that aspect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he was trying to explain the part of the story where he translated the message into Spanish.
Or should he have self-censored that aspect?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424183</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>phrenq</author>
	<datestamp>1245692340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Us three skinny <b>white</b> guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.</p></div></div><p>Offensive to pedants and  grammar Nazis, too! "<b>WE</b> three skinny white guys." Seriously, my eyeballs are twitching after reading that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.Offensive to pedants and grammar Nazis , too !
" WE three skinny white guys .
" Seriously , my eyeballs are twitching after reading that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.Offensive to pedants and  grammar Nazis, too!
"WE three skinny white guys.
" Seriously, my eyeballs are twitching after reading that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435689</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245787680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Burke almost certainly never said that.</p><p>http://tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote.html</p><p>It's not the kind of thing he would have said, as he was against empty yet pithy sayings which could be used to argue for either side.</p><p>If you want to risk your life over something, there's plenty of opportunity around the world to do for freedom or against oppression rather than your personal right to own an ipod unmolested.</p><p>I think it is true that we have lost something as a community by devolving our powers to hold others accountable for crime to the police, but we have gained a lot too.  In particular a more even distribution of justice to those who wouldn't be able to force justice by their own power.</p><p>Would you call a ten year old who doesn't chase down an eighteen year old a coward?  How about a doddery old ninety year old?   How about a weedy geek for not chasing down a thief with a gun?  How about someone who only believes that the thief is likely to have a weapon and not be particularly bothered if he kills?</p><p>None of that is cowardice.  If you are confident enough in your own abilities, that's great for you, and I encourage you to take reasonable steps to defend your property (not including murder... it's only stuff man, life even the life of a thief is more important), but there's no need for your attitude towards others in a different physical situation to yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burke almost certainly never said that.http : //tartarus.org/ ~ martin/essays/burkequote.htmlIt 's not the kind of thing he would have said , as he was against empty yet pithy sayings which could be used to argue for either side.If you want to risk your life over something , there 's plenty of opportunity around the world to do for freedom or against oppression rather than your personal right to own an ipod unmolested.I think it is true that we have lost something as a community by devolving our powers to hold others accountable for crime to the police , but we have gained a lot too .
In particular a more even distribution of justice to those who would n't be able to force justice by their own power.Would you call a ten year old who does n't chase down an eighteen year old a coward ?
How about a doddery old ninety year old ?
How about a weedy geek for not chasing down a thief with a gun ?
How about someone who only believes that the thief is likely to have a weapon and not be particularly bothered if he kills ? None of that is cowardice .
If you are confident enough in your own abilities , that 's great for you , and I encourage you to take reasonable steps to defend your property ( not including murder... it 's only stuff man , life even the life of a thief is more important ) , but there 's no need for your attitude towards others in a different physical situation to yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burke almost certainly never said that.http://tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote.htmlIt's not the kind of thing he would have said, as he was against empty yet pithy sayings which could be used to argue for either side.If you want to risk your life over something, there's plenty of opportunity around the world to do for freedom or against oppression rather than your personal right to own an ipod unmolested.I think it is true that we have lost something as a community by devolving our powers to hold others accountable for crime to the police, but we have gained a lot too.
In particular a more even distribution of justice to those who wouldn't be able to force justice by their own power.Would you call a ten year old who doesn't chase down an eighteen year old a coward?
How about a doddery old ninety year old?
How about a weedy geek for not chasing down a thief with a gun?
How about someone who only believes that the thief is likely to have a weapon and not be particularly bothered if he kills?None of that is cowardice.
If you are confident enough in your own abilities, that's great for you, and I encourage you to take reasonable steps to defend your property (not including murder... it's only stuff man, life even the life of a thief is more important), but there's no need for your attitude towards others in a different physical situation to yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423043</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the point in constantly referring to the ethnicity of their 3 man crew was that 1) they were in an area predominantly occupied by another ethnicity which often leads to violence according to the area 2) there's nothing \_less\_ intimidating than 3 scrawny white guys... seriously.. what combination of people is less intimidating based solely on ethnicity and bein' scrawny?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the point in constantly referring to the ethnicity of their 3 man crew was that 1 ) they were in an area predominantly occupied by another ethnicity which often leads to violence according to the area 2 ) there 's nothing \ _less \ _ intimidating than 3 scrawny white guys... seriously.. what combination of people is less intimidating based solely on ethnicity and bein ' scrawny ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the point in constantly referring to the ethnicity of their 3 man crew was that 1) they were in an area predominantly occupied by another ethnicity which often leads to violence according to the area 2) there's nothing \_less\_ intimidating than 3 scrawny white guys... seriously.. what combination of people is less intimidating based solely on ethnicity and bein' scrawny?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424511</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a word for the attitude above.</p><p>Cowardice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a word for the attitude above.Cowardice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a word for the attitude above.Cowardice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428133</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>blueskies</author>
	<datestamp>1245662640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Drive around the "right" area of philly at night long enough and you'll change your mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Drive around the " right " area of philly at night long enough and you 'll change your mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Drive around the "right" area of philly at night long enough and you'll change your mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425755</id>
	<title>Re:No remote shutoff</title>
	<author>NivekEnterprises</author>
	<datestamp>1245697740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too.</p><p>Or a remote self-destruct feature.</p></div><p>Isn't that the same thing?</p><p>Hammer meet Super Loud Electronic Device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too.Or a remote self-destruct feature.Is n't that the same thing ? Hammer meet Super Loud Electronic Device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A way to remotely set the phone to full volume and play a siren-tone non-stop would be nice too.Or a remote self-destruct feature.Isn't that the same thing?Hammer meet Super Loud Electronic Device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427083</id>
	<title>darwinawards</title>
	<author>ivanperez</author>
	<datestamp>1245702600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think they are expending a lot of time on tv or Internet. They didn't realize that the real world thiefs can be dangerous. if got wrong something in their jack bauer mission, maybe they would be in darwinawards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they are expending a lot of time on tv or Internet .
They did n't realize that the real world thiefs can be dangerous .
if got wrong something in their jack bauer mission , maybe they would be in darwinawards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they are expending a lot of time on tv or Internet.
They didn't realize that the real world thiefs can be dangerous.
if got wrong something in their jack bauer mission, maybe they would be in darwinawards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427957</id>
	<title>You're an idiot</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1245661920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recommend you don a mask and cape, toddle off down to the nearest ghetto and challenge the thugs there in the name of everything good and righteous.</p><p>It would make the world... or at least Slashdot, a better place.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recommend you don a mask and cape , toddle off down to the nearest ghetto and challenge the thugs there in the name of everything good and righteous.It would make the world... or at least Slashdot , a better place .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recommend you don a mask and cape, toddle off down to the nearest ghetto and challenge the thugs there in the name of everything good and righteous.It would make the world... or at least Slashdot, a better place.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423515</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245690060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mentality of urban fear?</p><p>I couldn't agree more.  The prevailing mentality of responding to violent thugs with fear and avoidance is precisely what is wrong with most US cities.   It does nothing but reinforce and enable the thug's antisocial behavior.</p><p>But I suspect you weren't advocating changing laws to allow people the means to defend themselves from physical violence (aka guns so they can shoot the bastards).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mentality of urban fear ? I could n't agree more .
The prevailing mentality of responding to violent thugs with fear and avoidance is precisely what is wrong with most US cities .
It does nothing but reinforce and enable the thug 's antisocial behavior.But I suspect you were n't advocating changing laws to allow people the means to defend themselves from physical violence ( aka guns so they can shoot the bastards ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mentality of urban fear?I couldn't agree more.
The prevailing mentality of responding to violent thugs with fear and avoidance is precisely what is wrong with most US cities.
It does nothing but reinforce and enable the thug's antisocial behavior.But I suspect you weren't advocating changing laws to allow people the means to defend themselves from physical violence (aka guns so they can shoot the bastards).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423255</id>
	<title>If you don't want to pay $99 for MobileMe</title>
	<author>8127972</author>
	<datestamp>1245689280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....Perhaps this would be an alternative:</p><p><a href="http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/iphone/" title="orbicule.com">http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/iphone/</a> [orbicule.com]</p><p>Not nearly as cool as MobileMe, but likely as effective (and perhaps safer too).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....Perhaps this would be an alternative : http : //www.orbicule.com/undercover/iphone/ [ orbicule.com ] Not nearly as cool as MobileMe , but likely as effective ( and perhaps safer too ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....Perhaps this would be an alternative:http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/iphone/ [orbicule.com]Not nearly as cool as MobileMe, but likely as effective (and perhaps safer too).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440929</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245779760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uncle Chop Chop says "Harden the fuck up!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uncle Chop Chop says " Harden the fuck up !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uncle Chop Chop says "Harden the fuck up!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425603</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>sheph</author>
	<datestamp>1245697140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about just don't steal shit?  It's a novel concept I know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about just do n't steal shit ?
It 's a novel concept I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about just don't steal shit?
It's a novel concept I know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791</id>
	<title>Amazed ...</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1245687600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA <p> <i>"I'd been amazed that the phone had enough battery life to make it through the night and still beam its location;"</i> </p><p>How much juice does one of these things consume??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA " I 'd been amazed that the phone had enough battery life to make it through the night and still beam its location ; " How much juice does one of these things consume ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA  "I'd been amazed that the phone had enough battery life to make it through the night and still beam its location;" How much juice does one of these things consume?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429021</id>
	<title>that's my house!</title>
	<author>the\_wesman</author>
	<datestamp>1245665520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not really, but I do live just a few blocks from the address shown on this dude's blog - there are WAAAAAY worse neighborhoods in chicago - this is hardly sketchy at all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not really , but I do live just a few blocks from the address shown on this dude 's blog - there are WAAAAAY worse neighborhoods in chicago - this is hardly sketchy at all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not really, but I do live just a few blocks from the address shown on this dude's blog - there are WAAAAAY worse neighborhoods in chicago - this is hardly sketchy at all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425763</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>oblivionboy</author>
	<datestamp>1245697800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to America, huh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to America , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to America, huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425627</id>
	<title>Re:Does this work outside the U.S.? Overseas?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245697200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it does work outside the US... I am in saudi and it works fine tried a few times and freaked a friend out and made him hate his new blackberry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it does work outside the US... I am in saudi and it works fine tried a few times and freaked a friend out and made him hate his new blackberry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it does work outside the US... I am in saudi and it works fine tried a few times and freaked a friend out and made him hate his new blackberry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427499</id>
	<title>Race Relations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245703680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like how he was offering a reward first, but when he found out the thief might be puerto rican he said he was calling the cops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how he was offering a reward first , but when he found out the thief might be puerto rican he said he was calling the cops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how he was offering a reward first, but when he found out the thief might be puerto rican he said he was calling the cops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424009</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad it wasn't an Android phone. "Where's My Android" doesn't need a laptop to track a phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad it was n't an Android phone .
" Where 's My Android " does n't need a laptop to track a phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad it wasn't an Android phone.
"Where's My Android" doesn't need a laptop to track a phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435693</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Xyde</author>
	<datestamp>1245787740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes but chances are nobody would bother stealing a G1. Mod me flamebait you know it's true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes but chances are nobody would bother stealing a G1 .
Mod me flamebait you know it 's true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes but chances are nobody would bother stealing a G1.
Mod me flamebait you know it's true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427417</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>foo fighter</author>
	<datestamp>1245703440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the "-1 Whinny/Pussy" mod?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the " -1 Whinny/Pussy " mod ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the "-1 Whinny/Pussy" mod?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28432427</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>RobertLTux</author>
	<datestamp>1245678600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some phones have the ability to go into a hard lock mode that requires a full firmware reload to unlock<br>(the phone displays "Return to \%carrier\%")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some phones have the ability to go into a hard lock mode that requires a full firmware reload to unlock ( the phone displays " Return to \ % carrier \ % " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some phones have the ability to go into a hard lock mode that requires a full firmware reload to unlock(the phone displays "Return to \%carrier\%")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425541</id>
	<title>Re:Fiund my iPhone, Now Go Get It</title>
	<author>Burning1</author>
	<datestamp>1245696960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Drug lords don't steal iphones, they sell drugs. Drug users on the other hand...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Drug lords do n't steal iphones , they sell drugs .
Drug users on the other hand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Drug lords don't steal iphones, they sell drugs.
Drug users on the other hand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423011</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245688440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Memo to self: do not post plans to steal electronic equipment on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. without ticking the "Post Anonymously" box</htmltext>
<tokenext>Memo to self : do not post plans to steal electronic equipment on / .
without ticking the " Post Anonymously " box</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Memo to self: do not post plans to steal electronic equipment on /.
without ticking the "Post Anonymously" box</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Per Wigren</author>
	<datestamp>1245689400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.</p></div><p>Why would you want to receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug?<br>I'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.Why would you want to receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug ? I 'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd prefer to lose my phone and shell out another $500 then receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.Why would you want to receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug?I'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424119</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>OglinTatas</author>
	<datestamp>1245692100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.</p></div><p>because elsewhere in the world when you confront a thief they just say "my bad" and give back the loot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.because elsewhere in the world when you confront a thief they just say " my bad " and give back the loot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this mentality of urban fear that shows how screwed up US cities really are.because elsewhere in the world when you confront a thief they just say "my bad" and give back the loot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422751</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>SchizoStatic</author>
	<datestamp>1245687480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or he got beat down by his own phone</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or he got beat down by his own phone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or he got beat down by his own phone</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426919</id>
	<title>Hey, that's my neighborhood!</title>
	<author>radmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1245702120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) It's not that ghetto. It's actually in the midst of gentrification.
2)busboys aren't the most dangerous people on the planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) It 's not that ghetto .
It 's actually in the midst of gentrification .
2 ) busboys are n't the most dangerous people on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) It's not that ghetto.
It's actually in the midst of gentrification.
2)busboys aren't the most dangerous people on the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428467</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1245663780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like it or not a street thug has nothing to lose. If they end up in jail, or have something added to their criminal record, it's not going to ruin their life. It's another day at the office. Ho hum. Not like they had any job prospects to ruin. Their life sux and they live by the law of the jungle so being injured or killed, while it matters to them is an ongoing possibility. They have some experience in dealing with violence and their instincts are good when it comes to getting out of there.</p><p>The law abiding citizen on the other hand doesn't have a criminal record, and it will ruin their job prospects if they get one. Try getting a job at a major bank with a criminal record. As for street smarts and instincts, they have none.</p><p>It's not a fair fight. Pretending it's a fair fight or that this is just a question of courage and standing up for your rights is foolish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like it or not a street thug has nothing to lose .
If they end up in jail , or have something added to their criminal record , it 's not going to ruin their life .
It 's another day at the office .
Ho hum .
Not like they had any job prospects to ruin .
Their life sux and they live by the law of the jungle so being injured or killed , while it matters to them is an ongoing possibility .
They have some experience in dealing with violence and their instincts are good when it comes to getting out of there.The law abiding citizen on the other hand does n't have a criminal record , and it will ruin their job prospects if they get one .
Try getting a job at a major bank with a criminal record .
As for street smarts and instincts , they have none.It 's not a fair fight .
Pretending it 's a fair fight or that this is just a question of courage and standing up for your rights is foolish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like it or not a street thug has nothing to lose.
If they end up in jail, or have something added to their criminal record, it's not going to ruin their life.
It's another day at the office.
Ho hum.
Not like they had any job prospects to ruin.
Their life sux and they live by the law of the jungle so being injured or killed, while it matters to them is an ongoing possibility.
They have some experience in dealing with violence and their instincts are good when it comes to getting out of there.The law abiding citizen on the other hand doesn't have a criminal record, and it will ruin their job prospects if they get one.
Try getting a job at a major bank with a criminal record.
As for street smarts and instincts, they have none.It's not a fair fight.
Pretending it's a fair fight or that this is just a question of courage and standing up for your rights is foolish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</id>
	<title>Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>RandomUsername99</author>
	<datestamp>1245688920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being one of the people that has spent a considerable amount of time living in one of those neighborhoods I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid. I wouldn't  pull that kind of BS with someone I sorta knew while they were standing in public, let alone in a neighborhood I've never been to before. I'm surprised that the guy who had the phone wasn't using it to call his friends to get down there and kick their asses, if for no other reason than to not appear to have been rolled by 3 scrawny nerds armed with a laptop in broad daylight.</p><p>If he stole the phone in the first place, he probably wasn't the most savory character in the world. What if he was on parole/probation/suspended sentence for something serious and could have been locked up? What if he was on some crazy uppers? What if he was actually meeting a large group of his buddies on that street corner? What if he was any of the above *and* armed?</p><p>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being one of the people that has spent a considerable amount of time living in one of those neighborhoods I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid .
I would n't pull that kind of BS with someone I sorta knew while they were standing in public , let alone in a neighborhood I 've never been to before .
I 'm surprised that the guy who had the phone was n't using it to call his friends to get down there and kick their asses , if for no other reason than to not appear to have been rolled by 3 scrawny nerds armed with a laptop in broad daylight.If he stole the phone in the first place , he probably was n't the most savory character in the world .
What if he was on parole/probation/suspended sentence for something serious and could have been locked up ?
What if he was on some crazy uppers ?
What if he was actually meeting a large group of his buddies on that street corner ?
What if he was any of the above * and * armed ? Not trying to be a troll here , but I 'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being one of the people that has spent a considerable amount of time living in one of those neighborhoods I can definitively say that what this guy did was extremely dangerous and stupid.
I wouldn't  pull that kind of BS with someone I sorta knew while they were standing in public, let alone in a neighborhood I've never been to before.
I'm surprised that the guy who had the phone wasn't using it to call his friends to get down there and kick their asses, if for no other reason than to not appear to have been rolled by 3 scrawny nerds armed with a laptop in broad daylight.If he stole the phone in the first place, he probably wasn't the most savory character in the world.
What if he was on parole/probation/suspended sentence for something serious and could have been locked up?
What if he was on some crazy uppers?
What if he was actually meeting a large group of his buddies on that street corner?
What if he was any of the above *and* armed?Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430125</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1245669660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still won't turn on. I've got to run to the store to get more- I think I'll try grapefruit this time. I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days.</p></div><p>iPhone is only compatible with Apple-certified fresh apple juice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still wo n't turn on .
I 've got to run to the store to get more- I think I 'll try grapefruit this time .
I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days.iPhone is only compatible with Apple-certified fresh apple juice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've poured a whole gallon of orange juice on my iPhone and it still won't turn on.
I've got to run to the store to get more- I think I'll try grapefruit this time.
I wish they would warn me about this when I bought the phone- juice is way too expensive these days.iPhone is only compatible with Apple-certified fresh apple juice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423953</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Jeremi</author>
	<datestamp>1245691620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?</i></p><p>Tin snips do a pretty good job...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , how do you remove the iPhone 's battery again ? Tin snips do a pretty good job.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?Tin snips do a pretty good job...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423113</id>
	<title>Re:Summary</title>
	<author>James Skarzinskas</author>
	<datestamp>1245688800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many new users generally just assume that you're just turning the iPod/iPhone on and off when you're really just toggling standby. Oops.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many new users generally just assume that you 're just turning the iPod/iPhone on and off when you 're really just toggling standby .
Oops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many new users generally just assume that you're just turning the iPod/iPhone on and off when you're really just toggling standby.
Oops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424199</id>
	<title>Re:Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can also track the IMEI.  It's a unique identifier for the phone (any phone I've seen).</p><p>I used to work for one of the GSM carriers in the US and after a customer called in to get a new phone because he had lost his old one, I took it upon myself to grab his IMEI number from his records (both the user account and the *phone records* record the IMEI, Tower, SIM, etc).  I then did a search in the system for that IMEI and sure enough I found someone else using it!  I called my manager who authorized me to call the person using the stolen phone, we offered him a new phone (with contract of course) if they brought the phone to a T-Mobile store.</p><p>The person had bought it (they said) and were happy to bring it in and exchange it for a new model.  I called back the original customer and told him where he could pick up his stolen phone.</p><p>So moral of the story?  Even phones that have had their SIM cards removed can be tracked.  Only issue of course is if your phone is taken to a different carrier (then that carrier would be the one to call to find your phone).  Of course, the operator has to want to help you and many if not all know about IMEI tracking. I know we would check IMEI's in the phone record to check up on customers who tried to scam us by saying that a phone that we mailed to them never arrived - again, call records would show what phone they were using.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also track the IMEI .
It 's a unique identifier for the phone ( any phone I 've seen ) .I used to work for one of the GSM carriers in the US and after a customer called in to get a new phone because he had lost his old one , I took it upon myself to grab his IMEI number from his records ( both the user account and the * phone records * record the IMEI , Tower , SIM , etc ) .
I then did a search in the system for that IMEI and sure enough I found someone else using it !
I called my manager who authorized me to call the person using the stolen phone , we offered him a new phone ( with contract of course ) if they brought the phone to a T-Mobile store.The person had bought it ( they said ) and were happy to bring it in and exchange it for a new model .
I called back the original customer and told him where he could pick up his stolen phone.So moral of the story ?
Even phones that have had their SIM cards removed can be tracked .
Only issue of course is if your phone is taken to a different carrier ( then that carrier would be the one to call to find your phone ) .
Of course , the operator has to want to help you and many if not all know about IMEI tracking .
I know we would check IMEI 's in the phone record to check up on customers who tried to scam us by saying that a phone that we mailed to them never arrived - again , call records would show what phone they were using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also track the IMEI.
It's a unique identifier for the phone (any phone I've seen).I used to work for one of the GSM carriers in the US and after a customer called in to get a new phone because he had lost his old one, I took it upon myself to grab his IMEI number from his records (both the user account and the *phone records* record the IMEI, Tower, SIM, etc).
I then did a search in the system for that IMEI and sure enough I found someone else using it!
I called my manager who authorized me to call the person using the stolen phone, we offered him a new phone (with contract of course) if they brought the phone to a T-Mobile store.The person had bought it (they said) and were happy to bring it in and exchange it for a new model.
I called back the original customer and told him where he could pick up his stolen phone.So moral of the story?
Even phones that have had their SIM cards removed can be tracked.
Only issue of course is if your phone is taken to a different carrier (then that carrier would be the one to call to find your phone).
Of course, the operator has to want to help you and many if not all know about IMEI tracking.
I know we would check IMEI's in the phone record to check up on customers who tried to scam us by saying that a phone that we mailed to them never arrived - again, call records would show what phone they were using.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429379</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>null etc.</author>
	<datestamp>1245666720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go ahead, hero, give up your life over an iPhone in order to defend the "cowardice" of this country.  I won't cry for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go ahead , hero , give up your life over an iPhone in order to defend the " cowardice " of this country .
I wo n't cry for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go ahead, hero, give up your life over an iPhone in order to defend the "cowardice" of this country.
I won't cry for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425139</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Archimonde</author>
	<datestamp>1245695640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The authors of the story were very lucky because the "find my iphone" feature is easily disabled. All it takes is to flip a clearly labeled switch in mail settings to OFF. Or disable location services (easily done too), or just format the iphone as a new one.</p><p>For this feature to truly work it would be great if they put a password on it and to be restore/format/network settings proof. That would be completely another story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The authors of the story were very lucky because the " find my iphone " feature is easily disabled .
All it takes is to flip a clearly labeled switch in mail settings to OFF .
Or disable location services ( easily done too ) , or just format the iphone as a new one.For this feature to truly work it would be great if they put a password on it and to be restore/format/network settings proof .
That would be completely another story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The authors of the story were very lucky because the "find my iphone" feature is easily disabled.
All it takes is to flip a clearly labeled switch in mail settings to OFF.
Or disable location services (easily done too), or just format the iphone as a new one.For this feature to truly work it would be great if they put a password on it and to be restore/format/network settings proof.
That would be completely another story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</id>
	<title>LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Lucas123</author>
	<datestamp>1245687300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other related news, the number of deaths among tech nerds increased this month, some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other related news , the number of deaths among tech nerds increased this month , some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other related news, the number of deaths among tech nerds increased this month, some officials believe as a direct result of iPhone owners attempting to retrieve their stolen phones from violent thugs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427527</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>icebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1245703740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, what are they going to do if you take the initiative? File a union grievance</p></div><p>No, they'll probably prosecute you.  We had a case just recently where a guy's truck was stolen; he encountered it later that day and gave chase, with the police on the phone.  They didn't give a shit until he said "oh, and once they stop I'm going to pull my shotgun out and hold them for you".  That got them to respond <i>real</i> quick.</p><p>I'm not saying it's <i>right</i> to just have to write off stolen property... but quite frankly, I don't want somebody getting hurt and then suing my ass claiming I told them to take matters into their own hands.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what are they going to do if you take the initiative ?
File a union grievanceNo , they 'll probably prosecute you .
We had a case just recently where a guy 's truck was stolen ; he encountered it later that day and gave chase , with the police on the phone .
They did n't give a shit until he said " oh , and once they stop I 'm going to pull my shotgun out and hold them for you " .
That got them to respond real quick.I 'm not saying it 's right to just have to write off stolen property... but quite frankly , I do n't want somebody getting hurt and then suing my ass claiming I told them to take matters into their own hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what are they going to do if you take the initiative?
File a union grievanceNo, they'll probably prosecute you.
We had a case just recently where a guy's truck was stolen; he encountered it later that day and gave chase, with the police on the phone.
They didn't give a shit until he said "oh, and once they stop I'm going to pull my shotgun out and hold them for you".
That got them to respond real quick.I'm not saying it's right to just have to write off stolen property... but quite frankly, I don't want somebody getting hurt and then suing my ass claiming I told them to take matters into their own hands.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433189</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245682380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By leaving it on for 30 minutes?  *ba dump cha!*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By leaving it on for 30 minutes ?
* ba dump cha !
* ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By leaving it on for 30 minutes?
*ba dump cha!
* ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424437</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And where did GP mention cities?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And where did GP mention cities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And where did GP mention cities?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423963</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"little did he know I had a loaded 12 guage..<br>one sucka dead L.A times front page."</p><p>What a Great Adventure 3 lego convention members tracking someone down and using "intimidation"<br>to get a iphone back. There are some real gangsters out there representing Apple, I hope I never come across one.....<br>my Linux affiliation could get me killed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" little did he know I had a loaded 12 guage..one sucka dead L.A times front page .
" What a Great Adventure 3 lego convention members tracking someone down and using " intimidation " to get a iphone back .
There are some real gangsters out there representing Apple , I hope I never come across one.....my Linux affiliation could get me killed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"little did he know I had a loaded 12 guage..one sucka dead L.A times front page.
"What a Great Adventure 3 lego convention members tracking someone down and using "intimidation"to get a iphone back.
There are some real gangsters out there representing Apple, I hope I never come across one.....my Linux affiliation could get me killed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423461</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1245689880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed. I live about three blocks west of 11th street, anything east of that is the ghetto. My favorite bar is on 15th street, and I walk there frequently. Aside from hookers and dope dealers soliciting me, I've had no problems despite my hazel eyes. Now, if I were to "go off" on one of these folks, I'd probably be in trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
I live about three blocks west of 11th street , anything east of that is the ghetto .
My favorite bar is on 15th street , and I walk there frequently .
Aside from hookers and dope dealers soliciting me , I 've had no problems despite my hazel eyes .
Now , if I were to " go off " on one of these folks , I 'd probably be in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
I live about three blocks west of 11th street, anything east of that is the ghetto.
My favorite bar is on 15th street, and I walk there frequently.
Aside from hookers and dope dealers soliciting me, I've had no problems despite my hazel eyes.
Now, if I were to "go off" on one of these folks, I'd probably be in trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428893</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>inject\_hotmail.com</author>
	<datestamp>1245664980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need more people like you on this planet...things would be way better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need more people like you on this planet...things would be way better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need more people like you on this planet...things would be way better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425439</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like playing Apple Bingo for armed robbers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like playing Apple Bingo for armed robbers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like playing Apple Bingo for armed robbers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423123</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>cjjjer</author>
	<datestamp>1245688800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would think, but what would be worse:<br> <br>Having to deal with your friends saying "remember the time when you left your $800 one week old iPhone 3GS at that resturant and someone took it"<br> <br>Or<br> <br>Getting beat down by some street thugs trying to get it back.<br> <br>Most people would have the issue with the friends making fun of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would think , but what would be worse : Having to deal with your friends saying " remember the time when you left your $ 800 one week old iPhone 3GS at that resturant and someone took it " Or Getting beat down by some street thugs trying to get it back .
Most people would have the issue with the friends making fun of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would think, but what would be worse: Having to deal with your friends saying "remember the time when you left your $800 one week old iPhone 3GS at that resturant and someone took it" Or Getting beat down by some street thugs trying to get it back.
Most people would have the issue with the friends making fun of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426547</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245700800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone runs on Apple juice. Duh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone runs on Apple juice .
Duh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone runs on Apple juice.
Duh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423235</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it shows how screwed up US suburbanites are. People that actually live in the city are mostly level headed about the "dangers" of the city.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it shows how screwed up US suburbanites are .
People that actually live in the city are mostly level headed about the " dangers " of the city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it shows how screwed up US suburbanites are.
People that actually live in the city are mostly level headed about the "dangers" of the city.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>conspirator57</author>
	<datestamp>1245688140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>perhaps because you have a self deprecating sense of humor?</p><p>amongst other things, i'm an American of predominately Scottish and Dutch descent, and i refer to myself by a large variety of slurs.</p><p>maybe we'd all be better off as a society if everyone just took a chill pill and enjoyed a good laugh at our own and each others' shared expense without getting so wrapped up in labels that most people don't even know the origin of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps because you have a self deprecating sense of humor ? amongst other things , i 'm an American of predominately Scottish and Dutch descent , and i refer to myself by a large variety of slurs.maybe we 'd all be better off as a society if everyone just took a chill pill and enjoyed a good laugh at our own and each others ' shared expense without getting so wrapped up in labels that most people do n't even know the origin of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps because you have a self deprecating sense of humor?amongst other things, i'm an American of predominately Scottish and Dutch descent, and i refer to myself by a large variety of slurs.maybe we'd all be better off as a society if everyone just took a chill pill and enjoyed a good laugh at our own and each others' shared expense without getting so wrapped up in labels that most people don't even know the origin of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429027</id>
	<title>Never had a problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245665520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have never lost a phone or had it stolen. What do I do? I keep the phone on a belt holster--and if I'm in an area pickpocketing is a problem, in my front pants pocket. I don't immediately set it down on the table when I'm in a restaurant/bar/club.</p><p>That being said, I've actually heard that police, if given a phone with a tracker, a car with a LoJack, or a laptop with "LoJack for Laptops", love to track it down. Why? Because they'll find a bunch of other stuff.</p><p>Around here, the state capitol complex police caught two college students breaking into a state warehouse. While two immature turds breaking into a warehouse isn't exactly a huge deal, a search of their house found $250,000 of equipment stolen from local government and university facilities.</p><p>If the police are given the opportunity to track a stolen iPhone, it'll probably lead them to, in this case, a nightclub bouncer with multiple outstanding warrants and a mountain of stolen property. Then you'll have a nightclub that nobody wants to go to for fear of their own bouncers. And the nightclub can then wish that they had kept a better eye on their staff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never lost a phone or had it stolen .
What do I do ?
I keep the phone on a belt holster--and if I 'm in an area pickpocketing is a problem , in my front pants pocket .
I do n't immediately set it down on the table when I 'm in a restaurant/bar/club.That being said , I 've actually heard that police , if given a phone with a tracker , a car with a LoJack , or a laptop with " LoJack for Laptops " , love to track it down .
Why ? Because they 'll find a bunch of other stuff.Around here , the state capitol complex police caught two college students breaking into a state warehouse .
While two immature turds breaking into a warehouse is n't exactly a huge deal , a search of their house found $ 250,000 of equipment stolen from local government and university facilities.If the police are given the opportunity to track a stolen iPhone , it 'll probably lead them to , in this case , a nightclub bouncer with multiple outstanding warrants and a mountain of stolen property .
Then you 'll have a nightclub that nobody wants to go to for fear of their own bouncers .
And the nightclub can then wish that they had kept a better eye on their staff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never lost a phone or had it stolen.
What do I do?
I keep the phone on a belt holster--and if I'm in an area pickpocketing is a problem, in my front pants pocket.
I don't immediately set it down on the table when I'm in a restaurant/bar/club.That being said, I've actually heard that police, if given a phone with a tracker, a car with a LoJack, or a laptop with "LoJack for Laptops", love to track it down.
Why? Because they'll find a bunch of other stuff.Around here, the state capitol complex police caught two college students breaking into a state warehouse.
While two immature turds breaking into a warehouse isn't exactly a huge deal, a search of their house found $250,000 of equipment stolen from local government and university facilities.If the police are given the opportunity to track a stolen iPhone, it'll probably lead them to, in this case, a nightclub bouncer with multiple outstanding warrants and a mountain of stolen property.
Then you'll have a nightclub that nobody wants to go to for fear of their own bouncers.
And the nightclub can then wish that they had kept a better eye on their staff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861</id>
	<title>Honkey?</title>
	<author>linux\_stu</author>
	<datestamp>1245687840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood... [people] eyed us three honkeys questioningly.</p></div><p>Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as "hokeys"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood... [ people ] eyed us three honkeys questioningly.Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as " hokeys " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood... [people] eyed us three honkeys questioningly.Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as "hokeys"?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427119</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245702720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You wanna throw your life away on an electronic gadget, go ahead.  The rest of us would rather be alive and robbed than dead with the chance of getting our stuff back.</p><p>Course, I live in the murder capitol of Canada, so that might have something to do with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You wan na throw your life away on an electronic gadget , go ahead .
The rest of us would rather be alive and robbed than dead with the chance of getting our stuff back.Course , I live in the murder capitol of Canada , so that might have something to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wanna throw your life away on an electronic gadget, go ahead.
The rest of us would rather be alive and robbed than dead with the chance of getting our stuff back.Course, I live in the murder capitol of Canada, so that might have something to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28448213</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245768780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call this bluff everytime someone makes it.  Crime doesn't magically stop at a postcode boundary - it's because residents of locality X call the cops and/or get involved more than locality Y.  Step up and get in the face of criminals.  When you call emergency during in-progress crime, be clear that you're describing the OFFENDER not some 'alleged' person that 'might be involved' politically correct crap.</p><p>I'd rather go down fighting a thief and have them subsequently wanted for assault as well (thus more willingness from the police in finding them), than letting it go as 'just a lost phone'.  Cowardice changes nothing.</p><p>(posted as AC because I see no reason to regiser for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call this bluff everytime someone makes it .
Crime does n't magically stop at a postcode boundary - it 's because residents of locality X call the cops and/or get involved more than locality Y. Step up and get in the face of criminals .
When you call emergency during in-progress crime , be clear that you 're describing the OFFENDER not some 'alleged ' person that 'might be involved ' politically correct crap.I 'd rather go down fighting a thief and have them subsequently wanted for assault as well ( thus more willingness from the police in finding them ) , than letting it go as 'just a lost phone' .
Cowardice changes nothing .
( posted as AC because I see no reason to regiser for / .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call this bluff everytime someone makes it.
Crime doesn't magically stop at a postcode boundary - it's because residents of locality X call the cops and/or get involved more than locality Y.  Step up and get in the face of criminals.
When you call emergency during in-progress crime, be clear that you're describing the OFFENDER not some 'alleged' person that 'might be involved' politically correct crap.I'd rather go down fighting a thief and have them subsequently wanted for assault as well (thus more willingness from the police in finding them), than letting it go as 'just a lost phone'.
Cowardice changes nothing.
(posted as AC because I see no reason to regiser for /.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423495</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>1u3hr</author>
	<datestamp>1245690000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot, with someone's real stolen phone at that location.</i> <p>

It wasn't a "blue dot" but a circle, the size of a city block.
</p><p>
Even if the police believed it, they're not going to bust down the doors of a whole apartment building to search for a phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot , with someone 's real stolen phone at that location .
It was n't a " blue dot " but a circle , the size of a city block .
Even if the police believed it , they 're not going to bust down the doors of a whole apartment building to search for a phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot, with someone's real stolen phone at that location.
It wasn't a "blue dot" but a circle, the size of a city block.
Even if the police believed it, they're not going to bust down the doors of a whole apartment building to search for a phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430141</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Kneo24</author>
	<datestamp>1245669720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called flavor. Useless details add more to a story to captivate your attention. If every story got straight to the point... well, we'd be a boring species.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called flavor .
Useless details add more to a story to captivate your attention .
If every story got straight to the point... well , we 'd be a boring species .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called flavor.
Useless details add more to a story to captivate your attention.
If every story got straight to the point... well, we'd be a boring species.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425445</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>IAmGarethAdams</author>
	<datestamp>1245696660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously you should be using Apple juice...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously you should be using Apple juice.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously you should be using Apple juice...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428619</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245664140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, so our streets aren't safe because we are giving up freedoms for security?  I think you are confusing two issues here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , so our streets are n't safe because we are giving up freedoms for security ?
I think you are confusing two issues here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, so our streets aren't safe because we are giving up freedoms for security?
I think you are confusing two issues here...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424065</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xenophobia was a survival trait. It's part of being human. So is being able to use reason to overcome it when it is not appropriate.</p><p>It's sickening to here all the newcasters or commentators saying "how could anyone do this?" or "how could a parent ever do this to their child?". They know how someone could do it. We all know. Some people just don't want to admit that somewhere in the dark recesses of their mind are hidden away all those thoughts. The fact that they never act on those thoughts never occurs to them. They are just taught to be ashamed for the mere existence of those thoughts, free will be damned.</p><p>Political Correctness will be the doom of us all while we sit around going "la la la I'm not thinking what I just thought" with our ears plugged and eyes closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xenophobia was a survival trait .
It 's part of being human .
So is being able to use reason to overcome it when it is not appropriate.It 's sickening to here all the newcasters or commentators saying " how could anyone do this ?
" or " how could a parent ever do this to their child ? " .
They know how someone could do it .
We all know .
Some people just do n't want to admit that somewhere in the dark recesses of their mind are hidden away all those thoughts .
The fact that they never act on those thoughts never occurs to them .
They are just taught to be ashamed for the mere existence of those thoughts , free will be damned.Political Correctness will be the doom of us all while we sit around going " la la la I 'm not thinking what I just thought " with our ears plugged and eyes closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xenophobia was a survival trait.
It's part of being human.
So is being able to use reason to overcome it when it is not appropriate.It's sickening to here all the newcasters or commentators saying "how could anyone do this?
" or "how could a parent ever do this to their child?".
They know how someone could do it.
We all know.
Some people just don't want to admit that somewhere in the dark recesses of their mind are hidden away all those thoughts.
The fact that they never act on those thoughts never occurs to them.
They are just taught to be ashamed for the mere existence of those thoughts, free will be damned.Political Correctness will be the doom of us all while we sit around going "la la la I'm not thinking what I just thought" with our ears plugged and eyes closed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423685</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>icebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1245690600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place.  They often have bigger things to worry about than random petty thieves; property crimes are probably pretty low on the priority list (unless someone got hurt in the process).  They might write up a report declaring it stolen, and put it on a "stolen goods" list, and advise you to call your phone company and get the phone canceled... but unless they're really, really bored, they aren't going to go after it.</p><p>Chasing it yourself can be pretty stupid; confronting the thief is beyond idiocy.  I'm all for citizens reacting in self-defense when threatened with immediate bodily harm--but that doesn't excuse doing so for mere property crimes, or vigilantism.  Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police.  One <i>might</i> justify following discreetly and calling in the police from a safe distance, but walking up to a known criminal and saying "hey dude, you stole my phone!" is just plain stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place .
They often have bigger things to worry about than random petty thieves ; property crimes are probably pretty low on the priority list ( unless someone got hurt in the process ) .
They might write up a report declaring it stolen , and put it on a " stolen goods " list , and advise you to call your phone company and get the phone canceled... but unless they 're really , really bored , they are n't going to go after it.Chasing it yourself can be pretty stupid ; confronting the thief is beyond idiocy .
I 'm all for citizens reacting in self-defense when threatened with immediate bodily harm--but that does n't excuse doing so for mere property crimes , or vigilantism .
Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police .
One might justify following discreetly and calling in the police from a safe distance , but walking up to a known criminal and saying " hey dude , you stole my phone !
" is just plain stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real issue would be getting the police to care in the first place.
They often have bigger things to worry about than random petty thieves; property crimes are probably pretty low on the priority list (unless someone got hurt in the process).
They might write up a report declaring it stolen, and put it on a "stolen goods" list, and advise you to call your phone company and get the phone canceled... but unless they're really, really bored, they aren't going to go after it.Chasing it yourself can be pretty stupid; confronting the thief is beyond idiocy.
I'm all for citizens reacting in self-defense when threatened with immediate bodily harm--but that doesn't excuse doing so for mere property crimes, or vigilantism.
Chasing criminals and stolen property is the job of the police.
One might justify following discreetly and calling in the police from a safe distance, but walking up to a known criminal and saying "hey dude, you stole my phone!
" is just plain stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424145</id>
	<title>Because he's white?  And it's not offensive?</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245692220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as "honkeys"?</i></p><p>Who said the word was "racially charged"?   I don't use it all the time myself but I'd feel zero offense being called a honkey.  And certainly none if I called myself one...</p><p>When will the PC madness end?  You are giving the word a power it should not have.  You chose what power words have over you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as " honkeys " ? Who said the word was " racially charged " ?
I do n't use it all the time myself but I 'd feel zero offense being called a honkey .
And certainly none if I called myself one...When will the PC madness end ?
You are giving the word a power it should not have .
You chose what power words have over you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does he feel the need to refer to his friends and himself with such a racially charged word as "honkeys"?Who said the word was "racially charged"?
I don't use it all the time myself but I'd feel zero offense being called a honkey.
And certainly none if I called myself one...When will the PC madness end?
You are giving the word a power it should not have.
You chose what power words have over you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435929</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1245790200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ah, when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots.</p></div><p>Say what you will, but when the revolution comes, count me in with the robot smashers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots.Say what you will , but when the revolution comes , count me in with the robot smashers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots.Say what you will, but when the revolution comes, count me in with the robot smashers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424667</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1245693960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>See, there's this thing called "common sense" that kind of tells you that the chances of the thief being someone who's desperate enough to steal an iPhone in a public location might not be so hot.
<br> <br>
Having been in these situations before, I can say that they're pretty damn lucky they dealt with a total n00b. If anything, what would have been safer would have been to let the police coordinate with them to really get the guy, since they knew what he looked like and could prove that he indeed stole the item.</htmltext>
<tokenext>See , there 's this thing called " common sense " that kind of tells you that the chances of the thief being someone who 's desperate enough to steal an iPhone in a public location might not be so hot .
Having been in these situations before , I can say that they 're pretty damn lucky they dealt with a total n00b .
If anything , what would have been safer would have been to let the police coordinate with them to really get the guy , since they knew what he looked like and could prove that he indeed stole the item .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, there's this thing called "common sense" that kind of tells you that the chances of the thief being someone who's desperate enough to steal an iPhone in a public location might not be so hot.
Having been in these situations before, I can say that they're pretty damn lucky they dealt with a total n00b.
If anything, what would have been safer would have been to let the police coordinate with them to really get the guy, since they knew what he looked like and could prove that he indeed stole the item.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423535</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245690060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It was a <b>Puerto Rican</b> neighborhood.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Us three skinny <b>white</b> guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>It talked to you in Spanish. And you saw three skinny <b>white</b> guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open.</p><p>So you take off down the road, and to your shock and horror, the <b>honkeys</b> follow you.</p></div><p>Nice story and great news for iPhone users.  Glad you got your phone back.  I'm also glad the altercation ended without violence.  I could have done without the above emphasized details.  I'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you're white<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people.</p></div><p>Not to mention the (not ironic, just stupid) slur used for whitey</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood.Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.It talked to you in Spanish .
And you saw three skinny white guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open.So you take off down the road , and to your shock and horror , the honkeys follow you.Nice story and great news for iPhone users .
Glad you got your phone back .
I 'm also glad the altercation ended without violence .
I could have done without the above emphasized details .
I 'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you 're white ... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people.Not to mention the ( not ironic , just stupid ) slur used for whitey</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood.Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.It talked to you in Spanish.
And you saw three skinny white guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open.So you take off down the road, and to your shock and horror, the honkeys follow you.Nice story and great news for iPhone users.
Glad you got your phone back.
I'm also glad the altercation ended without violence.
I could have done without the above emphasized details.
I'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you're white ... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people.Not to mention the (not ironic, just stupid) slur used for whitey
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</id>
	<title>Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245687060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It was a <b>Puerto Rican</b> neighborhood.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Us three skinny <b>white</b> guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>It talked to you in Spanish. And you saw three skinny <b>white</b> guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open.<br> <br>

So you take off down the road, and to your shock and horror, the <b>honkeys</b> follow you.</p></div><p>Nice story and great news for iPhone users.  Glad you got your phone back.  I'm also glad the altercation ended without violence.  I could have done without the above emphasized details.  I'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you're white<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood.Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.It talked to you in Spanish .
And you saw three skinny white guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open .
So you take off down the road , and to your shock and horror , the honkeys follow you.Nice story and great news for iPhone users .
Glad you got your phone back .
I 'm also glad the altercation ended without violence .
I could have done without the above emphasized details .
I 'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you 're white ... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a Puerto Rican neighborhood.Us three skinny white guys walked at a rapid pace in the direction of the circle.It talked to you in Spanish.
And you saw three skinny white guys prowling in the street with a laptop computer open.
So you take off down the road, and to your shock and horror, the honkeys follow you.Nice story and great news for iPhone users.
Glad you got your phone back.
I'm also glad the altercation ended without violence.
I could have done without the above emphasized details.
I'm not exactly sure what ethnicity had to do with the theft or why I had to be reminded that you're white ... or why you would assume that the thief uses racial slurs to identify Caucasian people.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425329</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Flamebait?  Troll.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flamebait ?
Troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flamebait?
Troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425819</id>
	<title>If I were the thief there'd be legos on my stool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No way in hell am I not smacking down the Lego platoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No way in hell am I not smacking down the Lego platoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No way in hell am I not smacking down the Lego platoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422847</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245687780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then the story wouldn't have been told.<br>They'd just walk away whistling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then the story would n't have been told.They 'd just walk away whistling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then the story wouldn't have been told.They'd just walk away whistling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435317</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1245697800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aka guns so they can shoot the bastards</p><p>Yep, more guns ALWAYS helps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>aka guns so they can shoot the bastardsYep , more guns ALWAYS helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aka guns so they can shoot the bastardsYep, more guns ALWAYS helps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440445</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245778020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really value your possessions (in this case a phone) so much that you would lay down your life for it?</p><p>The apple fanboys are getting way too devout now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really value your possessions ( in this case a phone ) so much that you would lay down your life for it ? The apple fanboys are getting way too devout now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really value your possessions (in this case a phone) so much that you would lay down your life for it?The apple fanboys are getting way too devout now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422933</id>
	<title>How robust is this service?</title>
	<author>goto begin</author>
	<datestamp>1245688140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the blue ring on the map was quite large, no doubt the phone was indoors - perhaps the apartment block that was mentioned in the story. Aside from the GPS signal being obstructed, what else can go wrong with this service?

Do you have to have the GPRS/3G data network enabled and connected? Does the phone have to be on?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the blue ring on the map was quite large , no doubt the phone was indoors - perhaps the apartment block that was mentioned in the story .
Aside from the GPS signal being obstructed , what else can go wrong with this service ?
Do you have to have the GPRS/3G data network enabled and connected ?
Does the phone have to be on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the blue ring on the map was quite large, no doubt the phone was indoors - perhaps the apartment block that was mentioned in the story.
Aside from the GPS signal being obstructed, what else can go wrong with this service?
Do you have to have the GPRS/3G data network enabled and connected?
Does the phone have to be on?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867</id>
	<title>Single Best Story I have read on Slashdot</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1245687840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is probably one of the more intriguing stories I have read on Slashdot recently. It was both amusing and informative. The best part is that this is pretty much free advertising for "Find my iPhone". Not only free advertising, but great advertising. I would bet money that half the people who read this article are going to download this app when they are done reading for the exact reason they want to be able to find their stolen iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably one of the more intriguing stories I have read on Slashdot recently .
It was both amusing and informative .
The best part is that this is pretty much free advertising for " Find my iPhone " .
Not only free advertising , but great advertising .
I would bet money that half the people who read this article are going to download this app when they are done reading for the exact reason they want to be able to find their stolen iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably one of the more intriguing stories I have read on Slashdot recently.
It was both amusing and informative.
The best part is that this is pretty much free advertising for "Find my iPhone".
Not only free advertising, but great advertising.
I would bet money that half the people who read this article are going to download this app when they are done reading for the exact reason they want to be able to find their stolen iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427849</id>
	<title>The thief can turn off "Find My iPhone"</title>
	<author>TPJ-Basin</author>
	<datestamp>1245661620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As thieves become aware of this application on the iPhone, I'm guessing they'll just go into the settings and turn off the "Find My iPhone" switch.<br> <br>I find it really odd that the application *doesn't* require any sort of keycode to turn a security feature off....</htmltext>
<tokenext>As thieves become aware of this application on the iPhone , I 'm guessing they 'll just go into the settings and turn off the " Find My iPhone " switch .
I find it really odd that the application * does n't * require any sort of keycode to turn a security feature off... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As thieves become aware of this application on the iPhone, I'm guessing they'll just go into the settings and turn off the "Find My iPhone" switch.
I find it really odd that the application *doesn't* require any sort of keycode to turn a security feature off....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423725</id>
	<title>Oh no!  A ticket from the PC police!</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1245690720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure what your problem was given the account was factual.</p><p>Would you rather they have said "Uniquely singular ethnic neighborhood"?   Would that have actually served to illustrate what they did was kind of a bad idea?</p><p>Why should people be forced to lie because you feel uncomfortable with the truths of how some areas of a city are?  Is it not true there are some ethnic areas of a city that are a bit dangerous to wander around in if you are not of that ethnicity?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what your problem was given the account was factual.Would you rather they have said " Uniquely singular ethnic neighborhood " ?
Would that have actually served to illustrate what they did was kind of a bad idea ? Why should people be forced to lie because you feel uncomfortable with the truths of how some areas of a city are ?
Is it not true there are some ethnic areas of a city that are a bit dangerous to wander around in if you are not of that ethnicity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what your problem was given the account was factual.Would you rather they have said "Uniquely singular ethnic neighborhood"?
Would that have actually served to illustrate what they did was kind of a bad idea?Why should people be forced to lie because you feel uncomfortable with the truths of how some areas of a city are?
Is it not true there are some ethnic areas of a city that are a bit dangerous to wander around in if you are not of that ethnicity?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423293</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1245689400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or not, they didn't actually get hurt and they got the phone back.</p><p>I doubt they even reached 500 car-miles of risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or not , they did n't actually get hurt and they got the phone back.I doubt they even reached 500 car-miles of risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or not, they didn't actually get hurt and they got the phone back.I doubt they even reached 500 car-miles of risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424103</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245692040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.</p></div><p>It was not only a supremely stupid thing to do without, at minimum, a police escort, but he also didn't pay the thief the promised reward for return of the phone (there was that handshake, see, implying a transaction and binding agreement).  The author of the article was acting just like a thug.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not trying to be a troll here , but I 'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.It was not only a supremely stupid thing to do without , at minimum , a police escort , but he also did n't pay the thief the promised reward for return of the phone ( there was that handshake , see , implying a transaction and binding agreement ) .
The author of the article was acting just like a thug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not trying to be a troll here, but I'm guessing that those guys have never really had their asses handed to them before.It was not only a supremely stupid thing to do without, at minimum, a police escort, but he also didn't pay the thief the promised reward for return of the phone (there was that handshake, see, implying a transaction and binding agreement).
The author of the article was acting just like a thug.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>RedK</author>
	<datestamp>1245688500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , how do you remove the iPhone 's battery again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424583</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're basically saying that you'd rather put yourself on the line for a completely replaceable material item.
<br> <br>
Just sayin'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're basically saying that you 'd rather put yourself on the line for a completely replaceable material item .
Just sayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're basically saying that you'd rather put yourself on the line for a completely replaceable material item.
Just sayin'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433185</id>
	<title>Re:It can be turned off..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245682320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What kind of idiot would have an iPhone and not have a pin lock?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of idiot would have an iPhone and not have a pin lock ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of idiot would have an iPhone and not have a pin lock?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</id>
	<title>Memo to self</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1245687660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When stealing electronic equipment immediately disable all radios or remove all batteries.</p><p>While I'm at it remember to never plug it into any network until I'm sure it's not going to phone home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When stealing electronic equipment immediately disable all radios or remove all batteries.While I 'm at it remember to never plug it into any network until I 'm sure it 's not going to phone home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When stealing electronic equipment immediately disable all radios or remove all batteries.While I'm at it remember to never plug it into any network until I'm sure it's not going to phone home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425859</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just to make sure I'm following your logic:</p><p>"And that is what is wrong with our society today. People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them, and leave them to be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim."   -leading to...</p><p>"I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway. Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim."  -then you would be likely assaulted/injured, possibly killed... which would make him being off the streets possibly irrelevant for you in the worse case.  Are you REALLY going to back your tough talk w/a street thug?  See below...</p><p>"...have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more???"  Yes, if you value your health/life more than your iPhone, (benefit for capture &amp; removal of thug from society notwithstanding).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to make sure I 'm following your logic : " And that is what is wrong with our society today .
People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them , and leave them to be ... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim .
" -leading to... " I would confront the asshole , and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone , then that person should be OFF the streets anyway .
Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim .
" -then you would be likely assaulted/injured , possibly killed... which would make him being off the streets possibly irrelevant for you in the worse case .
Are you REALLY going to back your tough talk w/a street thug ?
See below... " ...have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more ? ? ?
" Yes , if you value your health/life more than your iPhone , ( benefit for capture &amp; removal of thug from society notwithstanding ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to make sure I'm following your logic:"And that is what is wrong with our society today.
People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them, and leave them to be ... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim.
"   -leading to..."I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway.
Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim.
"  -then you would be likely assaulted/injured, possibly killed... which would make him being off the streets possibly irrelevant for you in the worse case.
Are you REALLY going to back your tough talk w/a street thug?
See below..."...have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more???
"  Yes, if you value your health/life more than your iPhone, (benefit for capture &amp; removal of thug from society notwithstanding).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427457</id>
	<title>Extremely stupid</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1245703620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know what it feels like to have something stolen from you, and I'm sure it feels pretty good that you got the phone back.  With that said, imo what you did was pretty dumb and could easily ended badly in any number of ways.

What if the person simply refused to hand it over?  Would you be willing to just walk away, or do you do something like engage in a fight with the person or try holding him down?  That will probably land your ass in jail, and on top of that, if this just happened to be someone dumb enough to buy it from the person who stole it thinking it was legit, then you' re really in trouble.

Putting concerns about getting in trouble with the law, what if the person decides to assault you, by himself or with a group of people?  Is an iphone worth your safety?  Is an iphone worth your friends safety?  How would you feel if this turned out badly, one of your friends gets killed, all so you could have your iphone back when there were other alternatives?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know what it feels like to have something stolen from you , and I 'm sure it feels pretty good that you got the phone back .
With that said , imo what you did was pretty dumb and could easily ended badly in any number of ways .
What if the person simply refused to hand it over ?
Would you be willing to just walk away , or do you do something like engage in a fight with the person or try holding him down ?
That will probably land your ass in jail , and on top of that , if this just happened to be someone dumb enough to buy it from the person who stole it thinking it was legit , then you ' re really in trouble .
Putting concerns about getting in trouble with the law , what if the person decides to assault you , by himself or with a group of people ?
Is an iphone worth your safety ?
Is an iphone worth your friends safety ?
How would you feel if this turned out badly , one of your friends gets killed , all so you could have your iphone back when there were other alternatives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know what it feels like to have something stolen from you, and I'm sure it feels pretty good that you got the phone back.
With that said, imo what you did was pretty dumb and could easily ended badly in any number of ways.
What if the person simply refused to hand it over?
Would you be willing to just walk away, or do you do something like engage in a fight with the person or try holding him down?
That will probably land your ass in jail, and on top of that, if this just happened to be someone dumb enough to buy it from the person who stole it thinking it was legit, then you' re really in trouble.
Putting concerns about getting in trouble with the law, what if the person decides to assault you, by himself or with a group of people?
Is an iphone worth your safety?
Is an iphone worth your friends safety?
How would you feel if this turned out badly, one of your friends gets killed, all so you could have your iphone back when there were other alternatives?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425435</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1245696600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, when will man learn that all races are equally inferior to robots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429315</id>
	<title>"Find my iPhone"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245666540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Find my iPhone" feature can also apparently make the phone sound, even if it's set to vibrate or silent--useful if you lost it under a cushion in your house. This idea was mentioned on a recent episode of "American Dad!", and it's something I've bounced around in my head before. Now it's reality, and I see one big problem with it:</p><p>Your boss: "I see that you have a personal iPhone now. You're going to give me access to track you online, and to override your phone's vibrate setting and make your phone ring, in case I have to get a hold of you after hours."</p><p>I once had a user support job where a few users thought my cell phone was their at-home tech-support line. I had said to myself that if they started calling my personal cell phone while I was at work, I'd start leaving it at home. What? It's my personal cell phone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Find my iPhone " feature can also apparently make the phone sound , even if it 's set to vibrate or silent--useful if you lost it under a cushion in your house .
This idea was mentioned on a recent episode of " American Dad !
" , and it 's something I 've bounced around in my head before .
Now it 's reality , and I see one big problem with it : Your boss : " I see that you have a personal iPhone now .
You 're going to give me access to track you online , and to override your phone 's vibrate setting and make your phone ring , in case I have to get a hold of you after hours .
" I once had a user support job where a few users thought my cell phone was their at-home tech-support line .
I had said to myself that if they started calling my personal cell phone while I was at work , I 'd start leaving it at home .
What ? It 's my personal cell phone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Find my iPhone" feature can also apparently make the phone sound, even if it's set to vibrate or silent--useful if you lost it under a cushion in your house.
This idea was mentioned on a recent episode of "American Dad!
", and it's something I've bounced around in my head before.
Now it's reality, and I see one big problem with it:Your boss: "I see that you have a personal iPhone now.
You're going to give me access to track you online, and to override your phone's vibrate setting and make your phone ring, in case I have to get a hold of you after hours.
"I once had a user support job where a few users thought my cell phone was their at-home tech-support line.
I had said to myself that if they started calling my personal cell phone while I was at work, I'd start leaving it at home.
What? It's my personal cell phone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427443</id>
	<title>Political correcness.</title>
	<author>eiapoce</author>
	<datestamp>1245703560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They stole his phone and in the end he is apologising for writing that the thieve is a Portorican.  Maybe he would have made the same if it was a black or arab but maybe not for not a white... Politically correctness is madness, and america is very VERY ill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They stole his phone and in the end he is apologising for writing that the thieve is a Portorican .
Maybe he would have made the same if it was a black or arab but maybe not for not a white... Politically correctness is madness , and america is very VERY ill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They stole his phone and in the end he is apologising for writing that the thieve is a Portorican.
Maybe he would have made the same if it was a black or arab but maybe not for not a white... Politically correctness is madness, and america is very VERY ill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426465</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1245700440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand, and although I probably would have told the story a little differently--you probably could have guessed you'd get that reaction--I had a similar experience a while back.
<br> <br>
I was visiting Japan, and I was walking through an area of Tokyo where there were not many other gaijin, and I saw someone, probably a quarter mile away, who clearly looked more like me than anyone else.  He was about 6' tall, like me, light brown hair, like me, and a full beard, like me.
<br> <br>
Right then, seeing him standing out against hundreds of locals who were--for the most part--shorter, with darker hair and little or no facial hair, I thought, "Gee; I really stick out like a sore thumb here, don't I?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand , and although I probably would have told the story a little differently--you probably could have guessed you 'd get that reaction--I had a similar experience a while back .
I was visiting Japan , and I was walking through an area of Tokyo where there were not many other gaijin , and I saw someone , probably a quarter mile away , who clearly looked more like me than anyone else .
He was about 6 ' tall , like me , light brown hair , like me , and a full beard , like me .
Right then , seeing him standing out against hundreds of locals who were--for the most part--shorter , with darker hair and little or no facial hair , I thought , " Gee ; I really stick out like a sore thumb here , do n't I ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand, and although I probably would have told the story a little differently--you probably could have guessed you'd get that reaction--I had a similar experience a while back.
I was visiting Japan, and I was walking through an area of Tokyo where there were not many other gaijin, and I saw someone, probably a quarter mile away, who clearly looked more like me than anyone else.
He was about 6' tall, like me, light brown hair, like me, and a full beard, like me.
Right then, seeing him standing out against hundreds of locals who were--for the most part--shorter, with darker hair and little or no facial hair, I thought, "Gee; I really stick out like a sore thumb here, don't I?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427181</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1245702900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who has a problem him mentioning the general ethnicity of the neighborhood is an ass. There is nothing wrong with describing people by ethic background.</p><p>He stated it because he was making the point that he was out of place. He was a fish out of water and did not know what to expect if he had entered deeper into the community as an outsider not being aware of the nature of the area.</p><p>He could have been confronted by some Puerto Rican street thug with a gun, and he was just a skinny white guy. Thats the point. Its not racist, its just that he was out of place and did not know what to expect. OBVIOUSLY whoever took his iPhone is a peice of shit theif... so its reasonable to assume that the person could have been capable of far more violent acts or trouble.</p><p>The point was... he simply didnt fit in, and did not know what to expect and that they stuck out like a sore thumb (which would have made it easier for the theif to notice 3 white guys with a macbook looking for their stolen phone)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who has a problem him mentioning the general ethnicity of the neighborhood is an ass .
There is nothing wrong with describing people by ethic background.He stated it because he was making the point that he was out of place .
He was a fish out of water and did not know what to expect if he had entered deeper into the community as an outsider not being aware of the nature of the area.He could have been confronted by some Puerto Rican street thug with a gun , and he was just a skinny white guy .
Thats the point .
Its not racist , its just that he was out of place and did not know what to expect .
OBVIOUSLY whoever took his iPhone is a peice of shit theif... so its reasonable to assume that the person could have been capable of far more violent acts or trouble.The point was... he simply didnt fit in , and did not know what to expect and that they stuck out like a sore thumb ( which would have made it easier for the theif to notice 3 white guys with a macbook looking for their stolen phone )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who has a problem him mentioning the general ethnicity of the neighborhood is an ass.
There is nothing wrong with describing people by ethic background.He stated it because he was making the point that he was out of place.
He was a fish out of water and did not know what to expect if he had entered deeper into the community as an outsider not being aware of the nature of the area.He could have been confronted by some Puerto Rican street thug with a gun, and he was just a skinny white guy.
Thats the point.
Its not racist, its just that he was out of place and did not know what to expect.
OBVIOUSLY whoever took his iPhone is a peice of shit theif... so its reasonable to assume that the person could have been capable of far more violent acts or trouble.The point was... he simply didnt fit in, and did not know what to expect and that they stuck out like a sore thumb (which would have made it easier for the theif to notice 3 white guys with a macbook looking for their stolen phone)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423901</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>MaggieL</author>
	<datestamp>1245691500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, while you're posturing about how superior and un-racist you are, you might want to drop your implicit assumption that there was danger of violence. Of course that wasn't condition by the racial spin. Was it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , while you 're posturing about how superior and un-racist you are , you might want to drop your implicit assumption that there was danger of violence .
Of course that was n't condition by the racial spin .
Was it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, while you're posturing about how superior and un-racist you are, you might want to drop your implicit assumption that there was danger of violence.
Of course that wasn't condition by the racial spin.
Was it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423269</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1245689340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really, name me one place where going to find somebody that you know is receiving stolen goods doesn't raise that possibility. This is hardly just an urban thing, trying to get things back from thieves is potentially very dangerous, you never know when that thief is going to turn out to be a two strikes offender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really , name me one place where going to find somebody that you know is receiving stolen goods does n't raise that possibility .
This is hardly just an urban thing , trying to get things back from thieves is potentially very dangerous , you never know when that thief is going to turn out to be a two strikes offender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really, name me one place where going to find somebody that you know is receiving stolen goods doesn't raise that possibility.
This is hardly just an urban thing, trying to get things back from thieves is potentially very dangerous, you never know when that thief is going to turn out to be a two strikes offender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433361</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245683400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That wouldn't be a problem, he's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone.</p><p>Oh, wait...</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitakerz/3652760684/" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow"> </a> [flickr.com] iphone locating another iphone, if the image doesn't post check out  flickrDOTcom/photos/whitakerz/3652760684</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would n't be a problem , he 's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone.Oh , wait... [ flickr.com ] iphone locating another iphone , if the image does n't post check out flickrDOTcom/photos/whitakerz/3652760684</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That wouldn't be a problem, he's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone.Oh, wait...   [flickr.com] iphone locating another iphone, if the image doesn't post check out  flickrDOTcom/photos/whitakerz/3652760684
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423767</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>dtmancom</author>
	<datestamp>1245690900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the future history of Star Trek, mankind was only able to evolve beyond petty political correctness with the Zephram Cochrane's 2nd most famous invention: anti-wadding panties.  When no one was able to get their panties in a wad, everyone was finally able to relax and stop being personally wounded by silly words.

See also: Zephram Cochrane's business rival, the invention of Skin Thickiner.  Never made it to market because the FDA wouldn't approve over the counter DNA therapy.  Some say Cochrane used a portion of his crazy warp-drive money to bribe FDA officials.  We may never know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the future history of Star Trek , mankind was only able to evolve beyond petty political correctness with the Zephram Cochrane 's 2nd most famous invention : anti-wadding panties .
When no one was able to get their panties in a wad , everyone was finally able to relax and stop being personally wounded by silly words .
See also : Zephram Cochrane 's business rival , the invention of Skin Thickiner .
Never made it to market because the FDA would n't approve over the counter DNA therapy .
Some say Cochrane used a portion of his crazy warp-drive money to bribe FDA officials .
We may never know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the future history of Star Trek, mankind was only able to evolve beyond petty political correctness with the Zephram Cochrane's 2nd most famous invention: anti-wadding panties.
When no one was able to get their panties in a wad, everyone was finally able to relax and stop being personally wounded by silly words.
See also: Zephram Cochrane's business rival, the invention of Skin Thickiner.
Never made it to market because the FDA wouldn't approve over the counter DNA therapy.
Some say Cochrane used a portion of his crazy warp-drive money to bribe FDA officials.
We may never know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429415</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245666900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?  It's a perfectly good survival instinct that's been around since humans existed.  The sooner you realize that not everyone has been brainwashed into the "happy-happy joy-joy, let's have a group hug and sing kumbyja(or however it's spelled)" mindset, the better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
It 's a perfectly good survival instinct that 's been around since humans existed .
The sooner you realize that not everyone has been brainwashed into the " happy-happy joy-joy , let 's have a group hug and sing kumbyja ( or however it 's spelled ) " mindset , the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
It's a perfectly good survival instinct that's been around since humans existed.
The sooner you realize that not everyone has been brainwashed into the "happy-happy joy-joy, let's have a group hug and sing kumbyja(or however it's spelled)" mindset, the better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424051</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the type of pedantry that keeps me coming back to Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the type of pedantry that keeps me coming back to Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the type of pedantry that keeps me coming back to Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915</id>
	<title>This is awesome.</title>
	<author>SeeSp0tRun</author>
	<datestamp>1245688020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The issue brought up that some folks may get hurt over the service is valid, but that is the fault of the person chasing the offender.
<br> <br>
Why not have it endorsed by law enforcement?  You go to the police, say my $400 (and to some $600) phone was stolen.  Maybe a lawyer can verify this, but I recall the grand theft charge being lowered to something around there.
<br> <br>
The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot, with someone's real stolen phone at that location.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue brought up that some folks may get hurt over the service is valid , but that is the fault of the person chasing the offender .
Why not have it endorsed by law enforcement ?
You go to the police , say my $ 400 ( and to some $ 600 ) phone was stolen .
Maybe a lawyer can verify this , but I recall the grand theft charge being lowered to something around there .
The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot , with someone 's real stolen phone at that location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue brought up that some folks may get hurt over the service is valid, but that is the fault of the person chasing the offender.
Why not have it endorsed by law enforcement?
You go to the police, say my $400 (and to some $600) phone was stolen.
Maybe a lawyer can verify this, but I recall the grand theft charge being lowered to something around there.
The issue would be getting the police to believe that the little blue dot is a real blue dot, with someone's real stolen phone at that location.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425851</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1245698220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With a hammer, of course.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With a hammer , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With a hammer, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434337</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>indiechild</author>
	<datestamp>1245688980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opportunist criminals, like most human beings, are pussies. You just have to keep an eye out for when they call their homies for backup.</p><p>I think you'd be surprised at how many "ordinary and everyday" people can be opportunist criminals. If you man up and confront them, they'll often give you your gear back after swiping it a few seconds earlier.</p><p>And of course, we're assuming common sense here. If you're outnumbered and you sense danger then you'd obviously back off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opportunist criminals , like most human beings , are pussies .
You just have to keep an eye out for when they call their homies for backup.I think you 'd be surprised at how many " ordinary and everyday " people can be opportunist criminals .
If you man up and confront them , they 'll often give you your gear back after swiping it a few seconds earlier.And of course , we 're assuming common sense here .
If you 're outnumbered and you sense danger then you 'd obviously back off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opportunist criminals, like most human beings, are pussies.
You just have to keep an eye out for when they call their homies for backup.I think you'd be surprised at how many "ordinary and everyday" people can be opportunist criminals.
If you man up and confront them, they'll often give you your gear back after swiping it a few seconds earlier.And of course, we're assuming common sense here.
If you're outnumbered and you sense danger then you'd obviously back off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430347</id>
	<title>Find my iPhone doesn't use the SIM</title>
	<author>Stu Charlton</author>
	<datestamp>1245670440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It uses the Phone's SN#, I believe.</p><p>How do I know this?  Well, I don't, but I've verified that Find my iPhone "works" with just WiFi if your phone is otherwise SIMless.</p><p>Unfortunately, "Works" is a relative term -- it will guess the location of the IP address based on the WHOIS information, which won't help much other than identify the ISP's location.</p><p>On the other hand, it will still display remote messages.   And will do a remote wipe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It uses the Phone 's SN # , I believe.How do I know this ?
Well , I do n't , but I 've verified that Find my iPhone " works " with just WiFi if your phone is otherwise SIMless.Unfortunately , " Works " is a relative term -- it will guess the location of the IP address based on the WHOIS information , which wo n't help much other than identify the ISP 's location.On the other hand , it will still display remote messages .
And will do a remote wipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It uses the Phone's SN#, I believe.How do I know this?
Well, I don't, but I've verified that Find my iPhone "works" with just WiFi if your phone is otherwise SIMless.Unfortunately, "Works" is a relative term -- it will guess the location of the IP address based on the WHOIS information, which won't help much other than identify the ISP's location.On the other hand, it will still display remote messages.
And will do a remote wipe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423831</id>
	<title>Re:Please Drop the Us V Them Mentality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't have to say anything negative to be labeled a racist.</p><p>Since you dared to even *mention* the race of a minority group, you deserve to be strung up in public by your toenails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have to say anything negative to be labeled a racist.Since you dared to even * mention * the race of a minority group , you deserve to be strung up in public by your toenails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have to say anything negative to be labeled a racist.Since you dared to even *mention* the race of a minority group, you deserve to be strung up in public by your toenails.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428421</id>
	<title>Re:Dangerous and Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245663600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That makes for some great chest pounding platitudes but the reality of the situation is that anyone who chases down an unknown criminal in an unknown neighborhood deserves whatever they get, and these guys were extremely lucky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That makes for some great chest pounding platitudes but the reality of the situation is that anyone who chases down an unknown criminal in an unknown neighborhood deserves whatever they get , and these guys were extremely lucky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That makes for some great chest pounding platitudes but the reality of the situation is that anyone who chases down an unknown criminal in an unknown neighborhood deserves whatever they get, and these guys were extremely lucky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424849</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245694680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, an advantage to the iphones hard to remove/replace battery!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , an advantage to the iphones hard to remove/replace battery !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, an advantage to the iphones hard to remove/replace battery!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423151</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1245688920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That wouldn't be a problem, he's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone.

Oh, wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would n't be a problem , he 's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone .
Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That wouldn't be a problem, he's got an app to track his MacBook on his iPhone.
Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435139</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1245695700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the problem right there. YOU are saying that the material good itself isn't worth dying over, but it is worth killing over.</p><p>Let me ask you this, would you want a guy willing to kill over a stolen iPhone wandering the streets of your town?  Because that is the only alternative you have.</p><p>I would be willing to confront someone over anything they stole from me. The dollar value is insignificant, whether it is $1 or Million. The fact that you can't see this scares me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the problem right there .
YOU are saying that the material good itself is n't worth dying over , but it is worth killing over.Let me ask you this , would you want a guy willing to kill over a stolen iPhone wandering the streets of your town ?
Because that is the only alternative you have.I would be willing to confront someone over anything they stole from me .
The dollar value is insignificant , whether it is $ 1 or Million .
The fact that you ca n't see this scares me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the problem right there.
YOU are saying that the material good itself isn't worth dying over, but it is worth killing over.Let me ask you this, would you want a guy willing to kill over a stolen iPhone wandering the streets of your town?
Because that is the only alternative you have.I would be willing to confront someone over anything they stole from me.
The dollar value is insignificant, whether it is $1 or Million.
The fact that you can't see this scares me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075</id>
	<title>Re:Beat down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245691980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug."</p><p>And that is what is wrong with our society today. People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them, and leave them to be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim.</p><p>I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you, because they won't, unless it is convenient to them to do so.</p><p>I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway. Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim.</p><p>Seriously, what is wrong with the world today, have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more???</p><p>We've already lost if that is the case. It is only a matter of time before we realize it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $ 500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug .
" And that is what is wrong with our society today .
People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them , and leave them to be ... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim.I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you , because they wo n't , unless it is convenient to them to do so.I would confront the asshole , and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone , then that person should be OFF the streets anyway .
Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim.Seriously , what is wrong with the world today , have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more ? ?
? We 've already lost if that is the case .
It is only a matter of time before we realize it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'd prefer to just lose my phone and shell out another $500 than receive a violent beat down at the hands of some street thug.
"And that is what is wrong with our society today.
People are scared of violent street thugs and would rather not bother them, and leave them to be ... violent thugs wondering the streets searching for their next victim.I guess it is too hard to get yourself trained and armed and stop thinking the police will protect you, because they won't, unless it is convenient to them to do so.I would confront the asshole, and if he wanted to kill me for my iphone, then that person should be OFF the streets anyway.
Life is too short is be a coward waiting to be the next victim.Seriously, what is wrong with the world today, have we so much to lose that we allow thugs to knowingly roam free for fear of losing more??
?We've already lost if that is the case.
It is only a matter of time before we realize it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425809</id>
	<title>Re:petty theft- not a mugging</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245698040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though, call <b>911</b> and talk to the city/town you're in now- and get ready to repeat everything, because police departments suck at talking to each other. </i>
</p><p>Yeah, that's the ticket.  Tie up phone lines people might be trying to use to report life-threatening situations so you can track down a damn phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though , call 911 and talk to the city/town you 're in now- and get ready to repeat everything , because police departments suck at talking to each other .
Yeah , that 's the ticket .
Tie up phone lines people might be trying to use to report life-threatening situations so you can track down a damn phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> As soon as you cross a jurisdictional line though, call 911 and talk to the city/town you're in now- and get ready to repeat everything, because police departments suck at talking to each other.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
Tie up phone lines people might be trying to use to report life-threatening situations so you can track down a damn phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424643</id>
	<title>Re:Amazed ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245693900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's only compatible with apple juice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only compatible with apple juice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only compatible with apple juice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423959</id>
	<title>Re:Summary</title>
	<author>chaim79</author>
	<datestamp>1245691680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless the iPhone is jailbroken or the thief Jailbrakes it you can't swap SIM cards, the iPhone only works with specific SIM cards that have to be registered at AT&amp;T (USA only, other countries my have other policies).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless the iPhone is jailbroken or the thief Jailbrakes it you ca n't swap SIM cards , the iPhone only works with specific SIM cards that have to be registered at AT&amp;T ( USA only , other countries my have other policies ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless the iPhone is jailbroken or the thief Jailbrakes it you can't swap SIM cards, the iPhone only works with specific SIM cards that have to be registered at AT&amp;T (USA only, other countries my have other policies).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307</id>
	<title>Re:Walking around "sketchy streets" a Macbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well.  Yes, I know I'm a terrible person.</p></div><p>Exactly, to put it differently, "steal an iPhone one day and have a free laptop delivered to you the next."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well .
Yes , I know I 'm a terrible person.Exactly , to put it differently , " steal an iPhone one day and have a free laptop delivered to you the next .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have been somewhat amused if their laptop got stolen as well.
Yes, I know I'm a terrible person.Exactly, to put it differently, "steal an iPhone one day and have a free laptop delivered to you the next.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425725</id>
	<title>Re:LoJack for your iPhone?</title>
	<author>Kneo24</author>
	<datestamp>1245697620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all.</p></div><p>Because, you know, once the phone is rendered disabled for the person who stole it, they're totally going to keep it instead of tossing it off to the side or selling it real fast for a few bucks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all.Because , you know , once the phone is rendered disabled for the person who stole it , they 're totally going to keep it instead of tossing it off to the side or selling it real fast for a few bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would suggest that a pragmatic approach might be the ability to remotely disable the phone totally so that it has to be sent some sort of authenticated authorisation code to be used at all.Because, you know, once the phone is rendered disabled for the person who stole it, they're totally going to keep it instead of tossing it off to the side or selling it real fast for a few bucks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436453</id>
	<title>Addition to the service</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1245753360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On 3G iPhones, when the keypad is unlocked take a picture with the videocall camera and email / MMS (with 3.0) it to the owner. Guaranteed to be looking straight at the damn thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On 3G iPhones , when the keypad is unlocked take a picture with the videocall camera and email / MMS ( with 3.0 ) it to the owner .
Guaranteed to be looking straight at the damn thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On 3G iPhones, when the keypad is unlocked take a picture with the videocall camera and email / MMS (with 3.0) it to the owner.
Guaranteed to be looking straight at the damn thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423127</id>
	<title>Re:This is awesome.</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1245688860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem:<br>Police don't give a fuck about you or your phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem : Police do n't give a fuck about you or your phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem:Police don't give a fuck about you or your phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435895</id>
	<title>Re:It's A Good Story, but...</title>
	<author>Mirell</author>
	<datestamp>1245789900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, congratulations, I explained the NPA-NXX number porting capabilities on my blog for you! Have fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , congratulations , I explained the NPA-NXX number porting capabilities on my blog for you !
Have fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, congratulations, I explained the NPA-NXX number porting capabilities on my blog for you!
Have fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425403</id>
	<title>Re:Memo to self</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245696480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?</p></div><p>Like <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/iPhone-3G-Battery/577/1" title="ifixit.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [ifixit.com] (or <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/iPhone-1st-Generation-Battery/448/1" title="ifixit.com" rel="nofollow">1st gen</a> [ifixit.com]).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , how do you remove the iPhone 's battery again ? Like this [ ifixit.com ] ( or 1st gen [ ifixit.com ] ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, how do you remove the iPhone's battery again ?Like this [ifixit.com] (or 1st gen [ifixit.com]).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423463</id>
	<title>Does this work outside the U.S.?  Overseas?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245689880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone know if this feature works outside the U.S.?  Overseas?  If the country the phone is (lost) in does not have Google Maps (like Vietnam) will it just give a geographic coordinate (latitude and longitude)?<br>Does anyone know if Mobile me will work on a "hacked" iPhone?  Unfortunately that's the only kind that works here!<br>Can the Mobile Me feature be disabled completely by a thief?  (I know that the location finding aspect can be disabled by turning off location services, sorry if I spilled the beans).  Is it protected by a password?  Will it survive SIM removal/replacement?  Will it survive a complete OS replacement (I guess not)?<br>Thanks for any and all answers to these questions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know if this feature works outside the U.S. ?
Overseas ? If the country the phone is ( lost ) in does not have Google Maps ( like Vietnam ) will it just give a geographic coordinate ( latitude and longitude ) ? Does anyone know if Mobile me will work on a " hacked " iPhone ?
Unfortunately that 's the only kind that works here ! Can the Mobile Me feature be disabled completely by a thief ?
( I know that the location finding aspect can be disabled by turning off location services , sorry if I spilled the beans ) .
Is it protected by a password ?
Will it survive SIM removal/replacement ?
Will it survive a complete OS replacement ( I guess not ) ? Thanks for any and all answers to these questions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know if this feature works outside the U.S.?
Overseas?  If the country the phone is (lost) in does not have Google Maps (like Vietnam) will it just give a geographic coordinate (latitude and longitude)?Does anyone know if Mobile me will work on a "hacked" iPhone?
Unfortunately that's the only kind that works here!Can the Mobile Me feature be disabled completely by a thief?
(I know that the location finding aspect can be disabled by turning off location services, sorry if I spilled the beans).
Is it protected by a password?
Will it survive SIM removal/replacement?
Will it survive a complete OS replacement (I guess not)?Thanks for any and all answers to these questions!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28432427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28438933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28448213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423495
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427759
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28443011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_22_1412234_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425541
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423391
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424643
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430125
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426547
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424009
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423307
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423151
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433361
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423403
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423373
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423297
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424075
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425859
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428467
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425763
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28438933
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425869
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440445
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424583
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435139
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28448213
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427957
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423951
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428421
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437705
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428619
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440947
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429379
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424119
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424437
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423529
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28432427
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423235
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424841
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435885
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429017
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427585
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427759
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28440047
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28434149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424305
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428133
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423269
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427483
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423515
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435317
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423011
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423031
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423953
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28433189
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28443011
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423313
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425603
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425139
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423255
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422941
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425005
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426083
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28428893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424065
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28437729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425247
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424535
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425435
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28435929
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28426465
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28424183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423271
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28429415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28430141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_22_1412234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28422915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423685
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28425343
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28427527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28423127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_22_1412234.28436077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
