<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_18_1736257</id>
	<title>Montana City Requires Workers' Internet Accounts</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1245349020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>justinlindh writes <i>"Bozeman, Montana is now <a href="http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10551414">requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information</a> for 'background checking.' A portion of the application reads, "Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.' The article goes on to mention, 'There are then three lines where applicants can list the Web sites, their user names and log-in information and their passwords.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>justinlindh writes " Bozeman , Montana is now requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information for 'background checking .
' A portion of the application reads , " Please list any and all , current personal or business websites , web pages or memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms , social clubs or forums , to include , but not limited to : Facebook , Google , Yahoo , YouTube.com , MySpace , etc .
' The article goes on to mention , 'There are then three lines where applicants can list the Web sites , their user names and log-in information and their passwords .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>justinlindh writes "Bozeman, Montana is now requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information for 'background checking.
' A portion of the application reads, "Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.
' The article goes on to mention, 'There are then three lines where applicants can list the Web sites, their user names and log-in information and their passwords.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>pixelpusher220</author>
	<datestamp>1245356640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization.</i>
<br> <br>
Really, who paid for their fire trucks?  I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change...
<br> <br>
Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters, that much is true.  But that's still a far cry from having a private fire department.
<br> <br>
<i>The police force does not protect you or your property, they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property. That doesn't do you any good. The damage is already done.</i>
<br> <br>

Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place.  Much of police work is after the fact, yes, but some is definitively preventative as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization .
Really , who paid for their fire trucks ?
I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change.. . Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters , that much is true .
But that 's still a far cry from having a private fire department .
The police force does not protect you or your property , they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property .
That does n't do you any good .
The damage is already done .
Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place .
Much of police work is after the fact , yes , but some is definitively preventative as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization.
Really, who paid for their fire trucks?
I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change...
 
Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters, that much is true.
But that's still a far cry from having a private fire department.
The police force does not protect you or your property, they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property.
That doesn't do you any good.
The damage is already done.
Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place.
Much of police work is after the fact, yes, but some is definitively preventative as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377361</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously? The only logical comment I can come up with for this is "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahaha!!"<br> <br>
I know, not the deepest comment ever posted on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. but this has got to be one of the biggest jokes ever... I'd expect to see something like that on April 1st...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
The only logical comment I can come up with for this is " BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahaha ! !
" I know , not the deepest comment ever posted on / .
but this has got to be one of the biggest jokes ever... I 'd expect to see something like that on April 1st.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
The only logical comment I can come up with for this is "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahaha!!
" 
I know, not the deepest comment ever posted on /.
but this has got to be one of the biggest jokes ever... I'd expect to see something like that on April 1st...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377399</id>
	<title>Uh yeah.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good luck with that.</p><p>Yeah sure, here's my wonderful web page with absolutely no offending material.  And look, it shows my love for the city of Bozeman, MT!</p><p>What?  Is that all of my accounts?  Of course it is!</p><p>I mean, what are they going to say if you only give them the accounts that you want them to see, or better yet, say that you don't have any, except an email address (which is one you just created on Google Mail and has no connection to anything else you have online)?</p><p>I wonder what bureaucrat came up with that great idea.</p><p>Of course, on the other hand, it's sort of a Darwin Award test for people who are both dumb enough to have compromising material online and who are not imaginative enough to realize that there is no way in Hell that they can enforce that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck with that.Yeah sure , here 's my wonderful web page with absolutely no offending material .
And look , it shows my love for the city of Bozeman , MT ! What ?
Is that all of my accounts ?
Of course it is ! I mean , what are they going to say if you only give them the accounts that you want them to see , or better yet , say that you do n't have any , except an email address ( which is one you just created on Google Mail and has no connection to anything else you have online ) ? I wonder what bureaucrat came up with that great idea.Of course , on the other hand , it 's sort of a Darwin Award test for people who are both dumb enough to have compromising material online and who are not imaginative enough to realize that there is no way in Hell that they can enforce that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck with that.Yeah sure, here's my wonderful web page with absolutely no offending material.
And look, it shows my love for the city of Bozeman, MT!What?
Is that all of my accounts?
Of course it is!I mean, what are they going to say if you only give them the accounts that you want them to see, or better yet, say that you don't have any, except an email address (which is one you just created on Google Mail and has no connection to anything else you have online)?I wonder what bureaucrat came up with that great idea.Of course, on the other hand, it's sort of a Darwin Award test for people who are both dumb enough to have compromising material online and who are not imaginative enough to realize that there is no way in Hell that they can enforce that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388601</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Stormy Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1245420660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most roads ARE privately designed and constructed.  They're just not privately paid for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most roads ARE privately designed and constructed .
They 're just not privately paid for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most roads ARE privately designed and constructed.
They're just not privately paid for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386509</id>
	<title>Re:Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>grrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1245444120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is a good point - even though I have no contacts in gmail I've always thought "yeah right get fkd" when those sorts of questions come up. Twitter does it now too. In the end I think it just serves to desensitise people to social engineering hacks - how is that a good thing????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a good point - even though I have no contacts in gmail I 've always thought " yeah right get fkd " when those sorts of questions come up .
Twitter does it now too .
In the end I think it just serves to desensitise people to social engineering hacks - how is that a good thing ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a good point - even though I have no contacts in gmail I've always thought "yeah right get fkd" when those sorts of questions come up.
Twitter does it now too.
In the end I think it just serves to desensitise people to social engineering hacks - how is that a good thing???
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378667</id>
	<title>What?!</title>
	<author>omegahelix</author>
	<datestamp>1245356400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who the hell would want to work for people like this?  F*&amp;\% you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell would want to work for people like this ?
F * &amp; \ % you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell would want to work for people like this?
F*&amp;\% you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380431</id>
	<title>Anybody got a password?</title>
	<author>NotmyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1245318720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Montanasnewsstation.com needs a logon to post.  Anybody got a throwaway.  Bugmenot is blank.

Irony, thy name is....</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Montanasnewsstation.com needs a logon to post .
Anybody got a throwaway .
Bugmenot is blank .
Irony , thy name is... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Montanasnewsstation.com needs a logon to post.
Anybody got a throwaway.
Bugmenot is blank.
Irony, thy name is....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377851</id>
	<title>Tastless, definitely, but brings up a good point..</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1245354240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's definitely a very 'grey' area for invasion of privacy, however, it's a double-edged sword.  I would definitely not ever hand out any of my personal login credentials to anyone regardless of some baseless attempt to poke into my personal life, but when you get down to it, I don't have anything hiding under a secret, social internet rug, either.

It's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediums, however, if it doesn't impact their daily job performance at work, I say let them make all the fools of themselves online as they want, but the day it impacts them at the work place, hit them with the pink slip.

Besides, doesn't the 90-day probationary period most employment places have pretty much handle this already?  It won't give them a Facebook/MySpace/whatever account, but why need an excuse to fire a bad employee?  So, you make a bad hiring decision as a company/manager/boss, simply repremand or fire, learn from your mistake and move on and get better at your interviewing skills.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's definitely a very 'grey ' area for invasion of privacy , however , it 's a double-edged sword .
I would definitely not ever hand out any of my personal login credentials to anyone regardless of some baseless attempt to poke into my personal life , but when you get down to it , I do n't have anything hiding under a secret , social internet rug , either .
It 's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediums , however , if it does n't impact their daily job performance at work , I say let them make all the fools of themselves online as they want , but the day it impacts them at the work place , hit them with the pink slip .
Besides , does n't the 90-day probationary period most employment places have pretty much handle this already ?
It wo n't give them a Facebook/MySpace/whatever account , but why need an excuse to fire a bad employee ?
So , you make a bad hiring decision as a company/manager/boss , simply repremand or fire , learn from your mistake and move on and get better at your interviewing skills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's definitely a very 'grey' area for invasion of privacy, however, it's a double-edged sword.
I would definitely not ever hand out any of my personal login credentials to anyone regardless of some baseless attempt to poke into my personal life, but when you get down to it, I don't have anything hiding under a secret, social internet rug, either.
It's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediums, however, if it doesn't impact their daily job performance at work, I say let them make all the fools of themselves online as they want, but the day it impacts them at the work place, hit them with the pink slip.
Besides, doesn't the 90-day probationary period most employment places have pretty much handle this already?
It won't give them a Facebook/MySpace/whatever account, but why need an excuse to fire a bad employee?
So, you make a bad hiring decision as a company/manager/boss, simply repremand or fire, learn from your mistake and move on and get better at your interviewing skills.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379783</id>
	<title>Democracy is by consensus; mugging isn't</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1245316500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force, or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools (by force), but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet, it's illegal?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's different.</p><ul>
<li>We, as citizens, using our votes, decided we want roads, schools, police, zoning, etc.</li><li>We agreed to share the cost.</li><li>Nobody gets to opt out, or everyone would try to freeload.</li><li>Hence, you have to pay.</li></ul><p>This is quite different than being mugged and getting nothing in return. If you don't like the bargian, you have options.</p><ul>
<li>Get into politics and try to change taxation and/or spending.</li><li>Move somewhere else.</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force , or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools ( by force ) , but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet , it 's illegal ? It 's different .
We , as citizens , using our votes , decided we want roads , schools , police , zoning , etc.We agreed to share the cost.Nobody gets to opt out , or everyone would try to freeload.Hence , you have to pay.This is quite different than being mugged and getting nothing in return .
If you do n't like the bargian , you have options .
Get into politics and try to change taxation and/or spending.Move somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force, or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools (by force), but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet, it's illegal?It's different.
We, as citizens, using our votes, decided we want roads, schools, police, zoning, etc.We agreed to share the cost.Nobody gets to opt out, or everyone would try to freeload.Hence, you have to pay.This is quite different than being mugged and getting nothing in return.
If you don't like the bargian, you have options.
Get into politics and try to change taxation and/or spending.Move somewhere else.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377371</id>
	<title>no freaking way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is completely without merit and rather insane.  I would walkout right then and there.  As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is completely without merit and rather insane .
I would walkout right then and there .
As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is completely without merit and rather insane.
I would walkout right then and there.
As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378403</id>
	<title>Lie</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1245355680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>N/A</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>N/A</tokentext>
<sentencetext>N/A</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28395053</id>
	<title>Re:Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>AudioInfecktion</author>
	<datestamp>1245403200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This calls for a deadtreeing.

1. Write nothing but see attachment in the space for the account information

2. Attach entire TOS for each site out there, even ones that you do not use and highlight the section about not sharing account information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This calls for a deadtreeing .
1. Write nothing but see attachment in the space for the account information 2 .
Attach entire TOS for each site out there , even ones that you do not use and highlight the section about not sharing account information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This calls for a deadtreeing.
1. Write nothing but see attachment in the space for the account information

2.
Attach entire TOS for each site out there, even ones that you do not use and highlight the section about not sharing account information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377793</id>
	<title>Here Are My InterNet Accounts +1, Informative</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Name: Philboyd Studge</p><p>Organization:  NRA ( National Rifle Association)</p><p>URL: <a href="http://home.nra.org/#/home" title="nra.org" rel="nofollow">N.R.A.</a> [nra.org]</p><p>UserId:  Uzziowner</p><p>Password: SportsmanNumber1</p><p>Notes: Buy more ammo for protection from Communists, Russkies, and DemocRATS.</p><p>I hope this helps stops the pinko commie DemocRATS.</p><p>Yours In War<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMdiPLnTgjw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Kilgore Trout</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Name : Philboyd StudgeOrganization : NRA ( National Rifle Association ) URL : N.R.A .
[ nra.org ] UserId : UzziownerPassword : SportsmanNumber1Notes : Buy more ammo for protection from Communists , Russkies , and DemocRATS.I hope this helps stops the pinko commie DemocRATS.Yours In WarKilgore Trout [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Name: Philboyd StudgeOrganization:  NRA ( National Rifle Association)URL: N.R.A.
[nra.org]UserId:  UzziownerPassword: SportsmanNumber1Notes: Buy more ammo for protection from Communists, Russkies, and DemocRATS.I hope this helps stops the pinko commie DemocRATS.Yours In WarKilgore Trout [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378665</id>
	<title>Ever been to Bozeman, MT?</title>
	<author>billybob\_jcv</author>
	<datestamp>1245356340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My bet is all the applicants responded with:  "What's a web page?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>My bet is all the applicants responded with : " What 's a web page ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My bet is all the applicants responded with:  "What's a web page?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701</id>
	<title>I call FUD</title>
	<author>stickytar</author>
	<datestamp>1245353940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds like FUD to me.  A quick look at the application for employment doesn't have anything like this on the forms.

<a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Application\%20for\%20Employment.pdf" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Application\%20for\%20Employment.pdf</a> [bozeman.net]

I'm not sure where this news organization gets their info, but that doesn't sound right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like FUD to me .
A quick look at the application for employment does n't have anything like this on the forms .
http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Application \ % 20for \ % 20Employment.pdf [ bozeman.net ] I 'm not sure where this news organization gets their info , but that does n't sound right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like FUD to me.
A quick look at the application for employment doesn't have anything like this on the forms.
http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Application\%20for\%20Employment.pdf [bozeman.net]

I'm not sure where this news organization gets their info, but that doesn't sound right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377487</id>
	<title>I'm not surprised one bit</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1245353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have lived in Bozeman for the past decade.  Our city council is the most asinine civic body I have ever encountered.  The tech company I work for is located out of city limits due to their gross inability to complete rudimentary city tasks such as to approve building plans.

Asking for passwords is pretty impressive, however...hats off to these guys!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have lived in Bozeman for the past decade .
Our city council is the most asinine civic body I have ever encountered .
The tech company I work for is located out of city limits due to their gross inability to complete rudimentary city tasks such as to approve building plans .
Asking for passwords is pretty impressive , however...hats off to these guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have lived in Bozeman for the past decade.
Our city council is the most asinine civic body I have ever encountered.
The tech company I work for is located out of city limits due to their gross inability to complete rudimentary city tasks such as to approve building plans.
Asking for passwords is pretty impressive, however...hats off to these guys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385795</id>
	<title>It's the same for every site:</title>
	<author>n0tquitesane</author>
	<datestamp>1245351000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>














-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
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<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/3QuGhrGr2s5+TpTIg8ByzxCYdQ9r95H6L9Ws+jzONA/pxhpV609LELwUdB/wMa0
j1lyHroZty+RuOWrsahgwGfNJMgHV2PiLbozQkPRNsHLpKBmaQCxszg10zP7Xtgh
wV3+kSjCDx7N9w+Cj5W16Gxg4E6233iTGOL2YjB+YVrHorhxYxVa1CgGDZ1xmjYP<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/RFxVSF3sTj4/6t3fIHDp+/N7a5WsFFI3Uku3hxmH0xDdNDCPcwoNIJ+Ajq41/AM
d8sln30b/pzaL3EqpmVxoZDiCCTxQHyFPNMsmRDeoARIk6vpbhnFNdYitzQEAZOt
FuunguEDDoWKQSMG3c2NRRhvCmDTmsd1us2sNvfUFWILQ48UT+2dhVvSdKdIgT7p
wTduMrrr83ZxgVayNVh38tTn6zXz1zVglxI9pOPdc/g1Fk3M1SY7a4x3bDEniLmC
rSoylqw23hZtvp3cOCrKuosDfRrtPBP5J3mYxW41PGrHuTaiozM1zUwMVgLxut1i
k3mJ70tOGrVjrfaJUN+umMGA4Umc6A93xknpcgKId/G7AkPHfVX8vYCoRgLgcHAV
kJo9BSE0HvJlrAt9pB3z3pKogeQ10YnPsiWz1xC0qrhZjsHZQ94/PAzMcV7EWV2G<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/YI8EibfD2+CK4TyVNUio7T+zKc+9nqgsxxcBtTfvkzlLMz+6xZm1vzlC9wZaSUf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</htmltext>
<tokenext>-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version : GnuPG v2.0.11 ( GNU/Linux ) hQQOA1HJydstO6XhEBAAg7bDv4sBwOduRu95 + Vg/kecSHw9DqGk0TMIObvqqHaLy tNrn2lXqaeT0hVxNI2O03WQO58kGOdWhwyKO1AA07TiwpcWiKnsANJnj0pSm2q5P + YBT2mdtIdna9NzEI57n7gxb7mK4XPUAyULdz3wxOunSV/nF2Wu69h8ljUsZ70wI O3wHXsshFMtTKx0iNwMQNGu9tptafq6oFQqp4iStufABRsmYEQPHRHmBiA8r1LVR ppA/lMinwIkpUwRhK1qeubGsc9Y6ZyGQAkmzSBnN/rkTQTF/DFLx0p93kwXDeCGw JJYxWx5EpEJhS35aZ9aevJL8pwCBortwH4HVtZPR4TPKkD9LdJM6b90 + 96FGgvW9 hLAypIUq/2kNhgNYK7hrHhnzqanpHRbTH7Vdx1RL636trifVJ4og4YWt + gk6B7zE cXqOS2HkjkzzN20LtYA3pyoIq7rXwwOc0YlSw4kRUJ6LHH6YsPx7VXDNeAVJ3 + bu /3QuGhrGr2s5 + TpTIg8ByzxCYdQ9r95H6L9Ws + jzONA/pxhpV609LELwUdB/wMa0 j1lyHroZty + RuOWrsahgwGfNJMgHV2PiLbozQkPRNsHLpKBmaQCxszg10zP7Xtgh wV3 + kSjCDx7N9w + Cj5W16Gxg4E6233iTGOL2YjB + YVrHorhxYxVa1CgGDZ1xmjYP /RFxVSF3sTj4/6t3fIHDp + /N7a5WsFFI3Uku3hxmH0xDdNDCPcwoNIJ + Ajq41/AM d8sln30b/pzaL3EqpmVxoZDiCCTxQHyFPNMsmRDeoARIk6vpbhnFNdYitzQEAZOt FuunguEDDoWKQSMG3c2NRRhvCmDTmsd1us2sNvfUFWILQ48UT + 2dhVvSdKdIgT7p wTduMrrr83ZxgVayNVh38tTn6zXz1zVglxI9pOPdc/g1Fk3M1SY7a4x3bDEniLmC rSoylqw23hZtvp3cOCrKuosDfRrtPBP5J3mYxW41PGrHuTaiozM1zUwMVgLxut1i k3mJ70tOGrVjrfaJUN + umMGA4Umc6A93xknpcgKId/G7AkPHfVX8vYCoRgLgcHAV kJo9BSE0HvJlrAt9pB3z3pKogeQ10YnPsiWz1xC0qrhZjsHZQ94/PAzMcV7EWV2G /YI8EibfD2 + CK4TyVNUio7T + zKc + 9nqgsxxcBtTfvkzlLMz + 6xZm1vzlC9wZaSUf 9EZmd1/ZQUksuDe5mJBrpcL6wmK7 + O0WL8287tPF3E4VYcDaIRmrju3tCfed7pD0 nRELKYzPrvgQusiaMbMwXhkF2gQ/GeK3W0VBoUYbMXqQ1XLuc3JPBbvquhHfXVLw fEGgaIsmrFQUdd5SBBtAf3r8f + HWZuduUyXdp7M4KdY20usB8Iza7puMS1zFAWkh OFJ + yjSPiIHqXNE + cWspfSrZtX6NMhgz7JXEcS/B2lcY4Xnn43qHzxkXAmKozMTp pnOnd0x5BCS3AXsY5antfcxYRek/rI8/9F4YccQlJv7jiTH + jL27qBu60KC4t + fe mDy5LgLKI4yphDVM3Val9BbMvSD79xjWw8G/9LPD/l8oHvlDJ4Umub + L2J8Yr1kB 5FqGkmfVzEurPPDU8v/aeGf/M8h2FtfvFvJeiirltjsbPL6B1oVJbUTieiJi7cDa l2Gm0WVrHzQjEIIHGBOpoCbEBKjpSluVXxW1SfKatgRWGc + nUNl7FF8qP + 2WvD/y HkOr6IyvrkAbZZoNLpaUlwNG + M + 7J3s8aV2BHPfh + CmOWnUQcMFN4IdD6lOyNwTc ajNqcx31H9mXS8ieb/0EFP8D0 + hOQBSQsZqh3 + x7ZQI0LHUcdU81r1ELS6LBRJqb FPTtImH5/vZ1aibzkiG0ECcwz6NmuVEUXE71fMl9fpnXi2eZ6W7e0Dik8124sL2y + OMcb7gqYLRRwkUCAHhrXpODVcIIjFSIUgCe/Ao3s6HVTSLgngBH862h7NTyQn/p tbc5ojYshuDfJn2W6yrtedU99d1YkPELDZwsSeCfUZ7KyOUy7xbQsBrWVWztJg1r CBCHTZ7oChS0qP74loB3FuTbwormV/j9nPVHP8yXMoyKPHtsz55pfQ9szB7KakNx F1WrVcq/O5SG80PQ/kf9RO/sXA2MGJDu5d1uDlfsahJEok12poIOHxDC9X29j5ob rNnT2PRs3Tl15faGT/ZC + fKpM4eALFKfdNt4Ft6dKuT8m8Y + Lmdjuru + mb5xY9q2 NcUNevcHYzrxNH9kE8qamLNskaleBvCTOhopvzSHcQ9XCRh4f8u3jKUagWgcIUaQ oyJrT + mlvu3juxdHFXY6QpNA7qHpgvL51ZxNkYuRQrhN4V/tgwnVH9xkuo0gwcQE BqJEzaK6spMTrRD0DPuSd9qfoJIr8AnSoHZvM66MuCU4qaEptECjeZIbC7HoXbCp oizx5fvKCya8GG8vSS + Q9XHXHFZFXkMBxsmz7X63u1pZ + 3h0dGq4Nxg/vIXM2dQp blpF3sEx3vVC8F7ExZOwagpvcEXu/W43v3FXpfDIdUYQZ806OKMNrMV4blh9sEZL a0exFVH2fS02l76LtLm8yC8NSRZcAxVbXoWtztBCDvZ1cjGEh + qkgNkvkZSlJQtm LXfEC3HRKr + yLUZXJCACNGDaAbMXyTIImbG2m/uLR4FXoFpARjbX4V6NznOIR + + Z EKI3wR9X6yF196da29g97PmcWbYDPKQU6mPgd9HgvZRjEub + ATqMVcTViZGSUJ9p CbwUE4JGq2yOP + 1Q1mH + KlLSbdPhNQ3eNnEDO2Y1eoyJ0pW + dkIHUDVATj5XV3nl rzzC5hfU8QnT7l1b60ESNw6gyW5J4ZtdmdbDZr1EzE9DwySVWbHyKkqxli6oixYk 6GYO404WEDJG8ZCPbJ7HCxZ4FPMjzSqKzyoMBgurnG7IBOfWIPZeD9Rlz1rztXoL WwZcMxfNy/1308VgUk6mgvJ8QbuEeQHohKgPSWiM/tFAgmkp9baYOZgXIkrdOhLv l + 5r4XZj84//dmWmZ8LujYUnB8Yx7D9xNtNjxcp1qQRJ0mS/Y9GSBvLWaOuygmlo NkIbzFhc2K0iUax5zlVsOZe8gMAPx8m3RzFxyiEF09GBZgaQYnWyHKntpIv759Ab bLOtY1Y6TQLs8IrqLJeTBrnPBrHto62yo8Dqzp1/G2IZzhPnX5FhKeIdMlwTUBvb a/3JvXAM4ZhplADxTepykj1Ulm56QRR8uQuGvfB6I10/YvBvnCbZIh5nfsXGscrB A2u0hY9Tswen5VUNvihCGLDnYu1KwoEjYvYAhgZrRL6lW7b2MmnrYN6MfXuxrpI0 ynphG6 + dEZNkgpYFURecy3XQeEWt60u0DZjXK8Z0rR0OqtiayTgjxjM/WQpCvLmr lJYJqw63Px4asfGeMnXr9BOZJtYMU9lLUd4CmqT4UEbd5HFklMj5iJHOHtB/gQS0 8JTI1fiNzoA7vpGanyRsYZxliwxYhhVWPMiK + Yj1TrqWGictJoove0vZRzrqVfSk BK/5LW/03/ggW4yzapuFzxbBaK5GCMUHfiVFE86KBCAkeMreMWssaGPO/M3jL1uj 8ZaJ + Gn74k7U + 6lCMk2/e9y2fiiQSq/gJA0/Kk6HbFGg3QQupmdxI91t5NyVZFBu kvjWYdTlo3gsUQwKBurUobXmLGQVabHqF/4GTOcf9eEFIGD4Wd3i5MB0b71okPtk biOhMHx0TdKnOmTmUpqC233hZxx1T45KVgBHRWYKSvdkB4pjbtJ1zoWbAOtwrplF ImZWwm/bJ52TkYJwktxjSIowHDL/FFjx35yKdAiMrfGjhdVoiRBSy4dwiN + LsUzW AAYywSx74RKd3t4SX0ShXdf2iXDaisysfXp0xjHfAsQXKx7qWVknG</tokentext>
<sentencetext>














-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

hQQOA1HJydstO6XhEBAAg7bDv4sBwOduRu95+Vg/kecSHw9DqGk0TMIObvqqHaLy
tNrn2lXqaeT0hVxNI2O03WQO58kGOdWhwyKO1AA07TiwpcWiKnsANJnj0pSm2q5P
+YBT2mdtIdna9NzEI57n7gxb7mK4XPUAyULdz3wxOunSV/nF2Wu69h8ljUsZ70wI
O3wHXsshFMtTKx0iNwMQNGu9tptafq6oFQqp4iStufABRsmYEQPHRHmBiA8r1LVR
ppA/lMinwIkpUwRhK1qeubGsc9Y6ZyGQAkmzSBnN/rkTQTF/DFLx0p93kwXDeCGw
JJYxWx5EpEJhS35aZ9aevJL8pwCBortwH4HVtZPR4TPKkD9LdJM6b90+96FGgvW9
hLAypIUq/2kNhgNYK7hrHhnzqanpHRbTH7Vdx1RL636trifVJ4og4YWt+gk6B7zE
cXqOS2HkjkzzN20LtYA3pyoIq7rXwwOc0YlSw4kRUJ6LHH6YsPx7VXDNeAVJ3+bu /3QuGhrGr2s5+TpTIg8ByzxCYdQ9r95H6L9Ws+jzONA/pxhpV609LELwUdB/wMa0
j1lyHroZty+RuOWrsahgwGfNJMgHV2PiLbozQkPRNsHLpKBmaQCxszg10zP7Xtgh
wV3+kSjCDx7N9w+Cj5W16Gxg4E6233iTGOL2YjB+YVrHorhxYxVa1CgGDZ1xmjYP /RFxVSF3sTj4/6t3fIHDp+/N7a5WsFFI3Uku3hxmH0xDdNDCPcwoNIJ+Ajq41/AM
d8sln30b/pzaL3EqpmVxoZDiCCTxQHyFPNMsmRDeoARIk6vpbhnFNdYitzQEAZOt
FuunguEDDoWKQSMG3c2NRRhvCmDTmsd1us2sNvfUFWILQ48UT+2dhVvSdKdIgT7p
wTduMrrr83ZxgVayNVh38tTn6zXz1zVglxI9pOPdc/g1Fk3M1SY7a4x3bDEniLmC
rSoylqw23hZtvp3cOCrKuosDfRrtPBP5J3mYxW41PGrHuTaiozM1zUwMVgLxut1i
k3mJ70tOGrVjrfaJUN+umMGA4Umc6A93xknpcgKId/G7AkPHfVX8vYCoRgLgcHAV
kJo9BSE0HvJlrAt9pB3z3pKogeQ10YnPsiWz1xC0qrhZjsHZQ94/PAzMcV7EWV2G /YI8EibfD2+CK4TyVNUio7T+zKc+9nqgsxxcBtTfvkzlLMz+6xZm1vzlC9wZaSUf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</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380637</id>
	<title>Re:Um, No</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1245319500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps one or more Slashdot editors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps one or more Slashdot editors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps one or more Slashdot editors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379815</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>NotmyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1245316560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And check this bit out:<blockquote><div><p>In accordance with Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 9, I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference
check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including
myself.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Elsewhere in the document does it claim that you relinquish your rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And check this bit out : In accordance with Montana Constitution , Article II , Section 9 , I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process ; however , by signing below , I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person , including myself .
Elsewhere in the document does it claim that you relinquish your rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And check this bit out:In accordance with Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 9, I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference
check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including
myself.
Elsewhere in the document does it claim that you relinquish your rights under the 13th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377287</id>
	<title>To Bozeman, Montana...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245352800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um.  No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
No.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377587</id>
	<title>Intrusive, but circumventable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm don't think they actually ask for passwords. I wish I could see the form.</p><p>But password aside,  I figure I have thousands of web site accounts. An order of magnitude more if you count tracking cookies. I could easily fill three lines with meaningless info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm do n't think they actually ask for passwords .
I wish I could see the form.But password aside , I figure I have thousands of web site accounts .
An order of magnitude more if you count tracking cookies .
I could easily fill three lines with meaningless info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm don't think they actually ask for passwords.
I wish I could see the form.But password aside,  I figure I have thousands of web site accounts.
An order of magnitude more if you count tracking cookies.
I could easily fill three lines with meaningless info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28395743</id>
	<title>Imported to Bozeman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245405840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried to create an account but never got my password, so I'm an anonymous coward right now. Sorry.<br>Anyway, I've lived in Bozeman for a little over 2 years now (I moved here from Boston), and weird employment rules seem to be a trend. I know Montanans don't like 'outsiders' moving here and are usually pretty offended when people compare how things are done here to how things are done in the rest of the civilized world, but I think that they would do well to take a few pages from the employment rulebook laid out by, say, the federal government. I've heard a number of horror stories about employers here in Bozeman and across the state - people not getting paid because OT has to be authorized by management (as if the employee manual trumps the law books), discriminitory practices that violate everything that the EEOC tries to enforce, people being fired or laid off based on the political bumper stickers on their cars, and the list goes on. One of the failures of the state labor board, it seems, is that nobody can file a grievance against an employer unless they are currently employed by that employer. The employer can therefore simply terminate employment in order to maintain a clean record with the labor department, and the employee is SOL. Learning that the City of Bozeman requests (though, they say, does not REQUIRE) login info for social networking sites is entirely appalling, but, after hearing these stories for the past 2 years, it is sadly not very surprising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to create an account but never got my password , so I 'm an anonymous coward right now .
Sorry.Anyway , I 've lived in Bozeman for a little over 2 years now ( I moved here from Boston ) , and weird employment rules seem to be a trend .
I know Montanans do n't like 'outsiders ' moving here and are usually pretty offended when people compare how things are done here to how things are done in the rest of the civilized world , but I think that they would do well to take a few pages from the employment rulebook laid out by , say , the federal government .
I 've heard a number of horror stories about employers here in Bozeman and across the state - people not getting paid because OT has to be authorized by management ( as if the employee manual trumps the law books ) , discriminitory practices that violate everything that the EEOC tries to enforce , people being fired or laid off based on the political bumper stickers on their cars , and the list goes on .
One of the failures of the state labor board , it seems , is that nobody can file a grievance against an employer unless they are currently employed by that employer .
The employer can therefore simply terminate employment in order to maintain a clean record with the labor department , and the employee is SOL .
Learning that the City of Bozeman requests ( though , they say , does not REQUIRE ) login info for social networking sites is entirely appalling , but , after hearing these stories for the past 2 years , it is sadly not very surprising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to create an account but never got my password, so I'm an anonymous coward right now.
Sorry.Anyway, I've lived in Bozeman for a little over 2 years now (I moved here from Boston), and weird employment rules seem to be a trend.
I know Montanans don't like 'outsiders' moving here and are usually pretty offended when people compare how things are done here to how things are done in the rest of the civilized world, but I think that they would do well to take a few pages from the employment rulebook laid out by, say, the federal government.
I've heard a number of horror stories about employers here in Bozeman and across the state - people not getting paid because OT has to be authorized by management (as if the employee manual trumps the law books), discriminitory practices that violate everything that the EEOC tries to enforce, people being fired or laid off based on the political bumper stickers on their cars, and the list goes on.
One of the failures of the state labor board, it seems, is that nobody can file a grievance against an employer unless they are currently employed by that employer.
The employer can therefore simply terminate employment in order to maintain a clean record with the labor department, and the employee is SOL.
Learning that the City of Bozeman requests (though, they say, does not REQUIRE) login info for social networking sites is entirely appalling, but, after hearing these stories for the past 2 years, it is sadly not very surprising.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379323</id>
	<title>Phishing</title>
	<author>nrozema</author>
	<datestamp>1245358320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hard to educate your users about phishing when your EMPLOYER is asking you for your login and password to personal sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard to educate your users about phishing when your EMPLOYER is asking you for your login and password to personal sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard to educate your users about phishing when your EMPLOYER is asking you for your login and password to personal sites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383797</id>
	<title>Only in Bozeman !</title>
	<author>speedlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1245333600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those who have not been to Montana, the BoZone is a bit of Seattle surrounded by Georgia, politically.  Most folks who move out there full time do so out of love for the beauty of the area.  I've a relative out there so have done some time there.  Ski Bridger Bowl !

There are about two dozen overqualified people for each paying job.  Your 7-11 clerk not only speaks english but has a PhD in English.  It is probably the most competitive area for a job...and when you get one, you also get "Bozeman salary shock" where you make what in any city would qualify you for Food Stamps and Medicaid.

I'm not at all surprised that in such an "employer's market" that someone would be this intrusive-Still, I love Bozeman, and if I somehow ever got a job with a pension (my pension is dying at my desk), I'd move out there.  Did I say Ski Bridger Bowl ?  I'd say Ski Discovery but I don't want anyone else to find it. (anaconda, MT)</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who have not been to Montana , the BoZone is a bit of Seattle surrounded by Georgia , politically .
Most folks who move out there full time do so out of love for the beauty of the area .
I 've a relative out there so have done some time there .
Ski Bridger Bowl !
There are about two dozen overqualified people for each paying job .
Your 7-11 clerk not only speaks english but has a PhD in English .
It is probably the most competitive area for a job...and when you get one , you also get " Bozeman salary shock " where you make what in any city would qualify you for Food Stamps and Medicaid .
I 'm not at all surprised that in such an " employer 's market " that someone would be this intrusive-Still , I love Bozeman , and if I somehow ever got a job with a pension ( my pension is dying at my desk ) , I 'd move out there .
Did I say Ski Bridger Bowl ?
I 'd say Ski Discovery but I do n't want anyone else to find it .
( anaconda , MT )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who have not been to Montana, the BoZone is a bit of Seattle surrounded by Georgia, politically.
Most folks who move out there full time do so out of love for the beauty of the area.
I've a relative out there so have done some time there.
Ski Bridger Bowl !
There are about two dozen overqualified people for each paying job.
Your 7-11 clerk not only speaks english but has a PhD in English.
It is probably the most competitive area for a job...and when you get one, you also get "Bozeman salary shock" where you make what in any city would qualify you for Food Stamps and Medicaid.
I'm not at all surprised that in such an "employer's market" that someone would be this intrusive-Still, I love Bozeman, and if I somehow ever got a job with a pension (my pension is dying at my desk), I'd move out there.
Did I say Ski Bridger Bowl ?
I'd say Ski Discovery but I don't want anyone else to find it.
(anaconda, MT)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379711</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1245316260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might be a good policy for a security company when interviewing potential employees; any that give up passwords (that work) would be immediately disqualified.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might be a good policy for a security company when interviewing potential employees ; any that give up passwords ( that work ) would be immediately disqualified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might be a good policy for a security company when interviewing potential employees; any that give up passwords (that work) would be immediately disqualified.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379497</id>
	<title>Privacy Religion</title>
	<author>FordPrefect276709</author>
	<datestamp>1245315660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's about time to found/join an official religion that forbids to disclose any personal information because this would ruin my karma.

Nobody could turn my application down for religious believes...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time to found/join an official religion that forbids to disclose any personal information because this would ruin my karma .
Nobody could turn my application down for religious believes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time to found/join an official religion that forbids to disclose any personal information because this would ruin my karma.
Nobody could turn my application down for religious believes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386691</id>
	<title>Legal Liability</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245403320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why the city of Bozeman would want to take on the legal liability of protecting this personal information.  Would it be unreasonable that certain people with access to this information could use it against someone by logging into the applicant's account and cause harm?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why the city of Bozeman would want to take on the legal liability of protecting this personal information .
Would it be unreasonable that certain people with access to this information could use it against someone by logging into the applicant 's account and cause harm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why the city of Bozeman would want to take on the legal liability of protecting this personal information.
Would it be unreasonable that certain people with access to this information could use it against someone by logging into the applicant's account and cause harm?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379391</id>
	<title>The Constitutional Right to Privacy</title>
	<author>betasam</author>
	<datestamp>1245358500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is no debate on the fact that this is an invasion of privacy. It seems to be a sort of test to keep tech savvy people (would that be everyone?) out of the hiring process. I am shocked at this. Here is an interesting note, the US constitution aside from the 9th amendment does <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#privacy" title="usconstitution.net">not guarantee the right to privacy.</a> [usconstitution.net] The right to privacy is enforced by the <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment09/" title="findlaw.com">interpretation of the First, Third and Fifth amendments and of the Ninth amendment</a> [findlaw.com] itself. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth\_Amendment\_to\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Computers\_and\_privacy" title="wikipedia.org">Fourth Amendment</a> [wikipedia.org] contains an explicit interpretation of the right to privacy specific to computers. They are still open to interpretation. So the issue is just not about private passwords here, there's a lot more being brought up. In India, <a href="http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/art222.htm" title="legalserviceindia.com">Article 21</a> [legalserviceindia.com] of the Indian Constitution expressly guarantees the Right to Privacy. There is some confusion and no explicit mention in the constitution of Britain either. From the little reading I have done, the right to privacy (and therefore keeping my own passwords from the state) has been created through addendum and interpretation of prior articles of constitution rather than a specific article or amendment mentioned in the constitution. ---- IANAL</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no debate on the fact that this is an invasion of privacy .
It seems to be a sort of test to keep tech savvy people ( would that be everyone ?
) out of the hiring process .
I am shocked at this .
Here is an interesting note , the US constitution aside from the 9th amendment does not guarantee the right to privacy .
[ usconstitution.net ] The right to privacy is enforced by the interpretation of the First , Third and Fifth amendments and of the Ninth amendment [ findlaw.com ] itself .
The Fourth Amendment [ wikipedia.org ] contains an explicit interpretation of the right to privacy specific to computers .
They are still open to interpretation .
So the issue is just not about private passwords here , there 's a lot more being brought up .
In India , Article 21 [ legalserviceindia.com ] of the Indian Constitution expressly guarantees the Right to Privacy .
There is some confusion and no explicit mention in the constitution of Britain either .
From the little reading I have done , the right to privacy ( and therefore keeping my own passwords from the state ) has been created through addendum and interpretation of prior articles of constitution rather than a specific article or amendment mentioned in the constitution .
---- IANAL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no debate on the fact that this is an invasion of privacy.
It seems to be a sort of test to keep tech savvy people (would that be everyone?
) out of the hiring process.
I am shocked at this.
Here is an interesting note, the US constitution aside from the 9th amendment does not guarantee the right to privacy.
[usconstitution.net] The right to privacy is enforced by the interpretation of the First, Third and Fifth amendments and of the Ninth amendment [findlaw.com] itself.
The Fourth Amendment [wikipedia.org] contains an explicit interpretation of the right to privacy specific to computers.
They are still open to interpretation.
So the issue is just not about private passwords here, there's a lot more being brought up.
In India, Article 21 [legalserviceindia.com] of the Indian Constitution expressly guarantees the Right to Privacy.
There is some confusion and no explicit mention in the constitution of Britain either.
From the little reading I have done, the right to privacy (and therefore keeping my own passwords from the state) has been created through addendum and interpretation of prior articles of constitution rather than a specific article or amendment mentioned in the constitution.
---- IANAL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382327</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Mishotaki</author>
	<datestamp>1245326700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun doesn't shine.</p></div><p>My apartment is small enough, i don't need so many applications shoved in here!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun does n't shine.My apartment is small enough , i do n't need so many applications shoved in here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun doesn't shine.My apartment is small enough, i don't need so many applications shoved in here!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378093</id>
	<title>Likely bureacratic rationale</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably had to fire someone for something sleazy recently, something that would have come out "if only" the city had known of the person's email address(es) and social networking logins.</p><p>I'm in big trouble if I apply with them and they do a complete background check.</p><p>-A. Coward</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably had to fire someone for something sleazy recently , something that would have come out " if only " the city had known of the person 's email address ( es ) and social networking logins.I 'm in big trouble if I apply with them and they do a complete background check.-A .
Coward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably had to fire someone for something sleazy recently, something that would have come out "if only" the city had known of the person's email address(es) and social networking logins.I'm in big trouble if I apply with them and they do a complete background check.-A.
Coward</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378023</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Velska1</author>
	<datestamp>1245354660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say "in secret". They ask you for it so they can vet you, and you hid stuff from em; so they are not liable?</p></div><p>I would surmise you are exactly right about that. If they have asked for it, they can say it's all your responsibility, fire you on the spot and say you defrauded them. In an age when employers are held liable for everything, it's hard to blame them...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say " in secret " .
They ask you for it so they can vet you , and you hid stuff from em ; so they are not liable ? I would surmise you are exactly right about that .
If they have asked for it , they can say it 's all your responsibility , fire you on the spot and say you defrauded them .
In an age when employers are held liable for everything , it 's hard to blame them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say "in secret".
They ask you for it so they can vet you, and you hid stuff from em; so they are not liable?I would surmise you are exactly right about that.
If they have asked for it, they can say it's all your responsibility, fire you on the spot and say you defrauded them.
In an age when employers are held liable for everything, it's hard to blame them...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380223</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where? Seattle, Washington?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where ?
Seattle , Washington ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where?
Seattle, Washington?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right. This is the thin end of the wedge - how can they even <i>think</i> that they have the right to ask for people's passwords!<br> <br>
I'm so astounded, I don't even know how to put my objections into words - I don't know where to start!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right .
This is the thin end of the wedge - how can they even think that they have the right to ask for people 's passwords !
I 'm so astounded , I do n't even know how to put my objections into words - I do n't know where to start !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right.
This is the thin end of the wedge - how can they even think that they have the right to ask for people's passwords!
I'm so astounded, I don't even know how to put my objections into words - I don't know where to start!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383861</id>
	<title>Lawsuit?</title>
	<author>randomnote1</author>
	<datestamp>1245333960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm surprised nobody's sued them yet.  If they want to check your background, they don't need your passwords to do that.  With the exception of Yahoo!, most of the other companies work pretty well with law officials.  Either way, I would not ever apply for a job with them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised nobody 's sued them yet .
If they want to check your background , they do n't need your passwords to do that .
With the exception of Yahoo ! , most of the other companies work pretty well with law officials .
Either way , I would not ever apply for a job with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised nobody's sued them yet.
If they want to check your background, they don't need your passwords to do that.
With the exception of Yahoo!, most of the other companies work pretty well with law officials.
Either way, I would not ever apply for a job with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377971</id>
	<title>Work for the city..?  no..</title>
	<author>Hillview</author>
	<datestamp>1245354540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but I think I'll go apply to work for whoever has the city of bozeman's garbage collecting contract.. and do whatever it takes to collect the trash from the city offices.

j/k, of course.. now, where did I put those rubber 'dumpster diving' gloves?</htmltext>
<tokenext>but I think I 'll go apply to work for whoever has the city of bozeman 's garbage collecting contract.. and do whatever it takes to collect the trash from the city offices .
j/k , of course.. now , where did I put those rubber 'dumpster diving ' gloves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but I think I'll go apply to work for whoever has the city of bozeman's garbage collecting contract.. and do whatever it takes to collect the trash from the city offices.
j/k, of course.. now, where did I put those rubber 'dumpster diving' gloves?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379735</id>
	<title>What if you don't have a Facebook account?</title>
	<author>Delkster</author>
	<datestamp>1245316380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from all the other incredible cluelessness this is screaming, what if I don't have a Facebook account? Or an account for MySpace or some other site where your login could be an arbitrary username? How do they distinguish that from me refraining to give the account information and just lying that I don't have an account?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from all the other incredible cluelessness this is screaming , what if I do n't have a Facebook account ?
Or an account for MySpace or some other site where your login could be an arbitrary username ?
How do they distinguish that from me refraining to give the account information and just lying that I do n't have an account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from all the other incredible cluelessness this is screaming, what if I don't have a Facebook account?
Or an account for MySpace or some other site where your login could be an arbitrary username?
How do they distinguish that from me refraining to give the account information and just lying that I don't have an account?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386885</id>
	<title>Re:Past experience - healthcare records</title>
	<author>bwcbwc</author>
	<datestamp>1245405660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially since all they need to do is create their own damn account and Friend you on facebook (assuming you'd accept). On Slashdot, they can see all your posts whether you're their friend or not, just by having an account. So not only is the request intrusive, they don't even need it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially since all they need to do is create their own damn account and Friend you on facebook ( assuming you 'd accept ) .
On Slashdot , they can see all your posts whether you 're their friend or not , just by having an account .
So not only is the request intrusive , they do n't even need it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially since all they need to do is create their own damn account and Friend you on facebook (assuming you'd accept).
On Slashdot, they can see all your posts whether you're their friend or not, just by having an account.
So not only is the request intrusive, they don't even need it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386723</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245403740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The public presence of police in that sense only delays the crime, and makes for far more cunning criminals when they have to always be on the lookout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The public presence of police in that sense only delays the crime , and makes for far more cunning criminals when they have to always be on the lookout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The public presence of police in that sense only delays the crime, and makes for far more cunning criminals when they have to always be on the lookout</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377997</id>
	<title>My password</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1245354600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>is a complete hex string of the pirated Wolverine mp3. Store that in your database, suckers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>is a complete hex string of the pirated Wolverine mp3 .
Store that in your database , suckers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is a complete hex string of the pirated Wolverine mp3.
Store that in your database, suckers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377835</id>
	<title>Really!</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1245354240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have they actually hired anyone that fell for their phishing scam or is that the test?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have they actually hired anyone that fell for their phishing scam or is that the test ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have they actually hired anyone that fell for their phishing scam or is that the test?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391981</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1245435060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I'd guess that unions might be first in line to force members to give over their rights -- so long as it's the UNION that's asking 'em to give it up, unions seem to be just fine with that sort of thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I 'd guess that unions might be first in line to force members to give over their rights -- so long as it 's the UNION that 's asking 'em to give it up , unions seem to be just fine with that sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I'd guess that unions might be first in line to force members to give over their rights -- so long as it's the UNION that's asking 'em to give it up, unions seem to be just fine with that sort of thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379153</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>inject\_hotmail.com</author>
	<datestamp>1245357840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it gets worse.  The application has a "survey" portion at the end which requests things that are technically forbidden: age, race/ethnicity, disability.  Everyone should read it, it's kinda comical...under "race/ethnicity" it says "check the one category which best describes your recognition in your community"...White (not Hispanic or Latino), Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino), Hispanic or Latino...a couple more, then this gem: Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino)....w...t...f...who the hell came up with this?  Oh, and if you do look at it...try to figure out what I'd pick if I came from the middle east...no option for Iranians and Syrians...Or, how about somewhere in, say, Kazakhstan?  They don't really exist, do they?</p><p>They even ask if the applicant has violated any criminal law or -traffic- regulations within the last five years!  Here's a flashlight, want me to drop my pants, too?</p><p>Pure offense...that's all I can say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it gets worse .
The application has a " survey " portion at the end which requests things that are technically forbidden : age , race/ethnicity , disability .
Everyone should read it , it 's kinda comical...under " race/ethnicity " it says " check the one category which best describes your recognition in your community " ...White ( not Hispanic or Latino ) , Black or African American ( Not Hispanic or Latino ) , Hispanic or Latino...a couple more , then this gem : Two or More Races ( Not Hispanic or Latino ) ....w...t...f...who the hell came up with this ?
Oh , and if you do look at it...try to figure out what I 'd pick if I came from the middle east...no option for Iranians and Syrians...Or , how about somewhere in , say , Kazakhstan ?
They do n't really exist , do they ? They even ask if the applicant has violated any criminal law or -traffic- regulations within the last five years !
Here 's a flashlight , want me to drop my pants , too ? Pure offense...that 's all I can say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it gets worse.
The application has a "survey" portion at the end which requests things that are technically forbidden: age, race/ethnicity, disability.
Everyone should read it, it's kinda comical...under "race/ethnicity" it says "check the one category which best describes your recognition in your community"...White (not Hispanic or Latino), Black or African American (Not Hispanic or Latino), Hispanic or Latino...a couple more, then this gem: Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino)....w...t...f...who the hell came up with this?
Oh, and if you do look at it...try to figure out what I'd pick if I came from the middle east...no option for Iranians and Syrians...Or, how about somewhere in, say, Kazakhstan?
They don't really exist, do they?They even ask if the applicant has violated any criminal law or -traffic- regulations within the last five years!
Here's a flashlight, want me to drop my pants, too?Pure offense...that's all I can say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378431</id>
	<title>Reminds me of this</title>
	<author>maninthespoon</author>
	<datestamp>1245355680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hello? Ah, Mr Victim, I'm glad to say that I've got the go-ahead to lend you the money you require. Yes, of course we will want as security the deeds of your house, of your aunt's house, of your second cousin's house, of your wife's parents' house, and of your grannie's bungalow, and we will in addition need a controlling interest in your new company, unrestricted access to your private bank account, the deposit in our vaults of your three children as hostages and a full legal indemnity against any acts of embezzlement carried out against you by any members of our staff during the normal course of their duties... no, I'm afraid we couldn't accept your dog instead of your youngest child, we would like to suggest a brand new scheme of ours under which 51\% of both your dog and your wife pass to us in the event of your suffering a serious accident. Fine. No, not at all, nice to do business with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello ?
Ah , Mr Victim , I 'm glad to say that I 've got the go-ahead to lend you the money you require .
Yes , of course we will want as security the deeds of your house , of your aunt 's house , of your second cousin 's house , of your wife 's parents ' house , and of your grannie 's bungalow , and we will in addition need a controlling interest in your new company , unrestricted access to your private bank account , the deposit in our vaults of your three children as hostages and a full legal indemnity against any acts of embezzlement carried out against you by any members of our staff during the normal course of their duties... no , I 'm afraid we could n't accept your dog instead of your youngest child , we would like to suggest a brand new scheme of ours under which 51 \ % of both your dog and your wife pass to us in the event of your suffering a serious accident .
Fine. No , not at all , nice to do business with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello?
Ah, Mr Victim, I'm glad to say that I've got the go-ahead to lend you the money you require.
Yes, of course we will want as security the deeds of your house, of your aunt's house, of your second cousin's house, of your wife's parents' house, and of your grannie's bungalow, and we will in addition need a controlling interest in your new company, unrestricted access to your private bank account, the deposit in our vaults of your three children as hostages and a full legal indemnity against any acts of embezzlement carried out against you by any members of our staff during the normal course of their duties... no, I'm afraid we couldn't accept your dog instead of your youngest child, we would like to suggest a brand new scheme of ours under which 51\% of both your dog and your wife pass to us in the event of your suffering a serious accident.
Fine. No, not at all, nice to do business with you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377343</id>
	<title>Business Websites???</title>
	<author>ATestR</author>
	<datestamp>1245352980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Please list any and all, current personal or business websites..."

Really?  Even if they can justify asking for personal information, business websites could include things like previous employer intranet logins, personal bank accounts, etc.  If presented with a job application that included this kind of stuff, I would run, not walk, to the nearest exit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Please list any and all , current personal or business websites... " Really ?
Even if they can justify asking for personal information , business websites could include things like previous employer intranet logins , personal bank accounts , etc .
If presented with a job application that included this kind of stuff , I would run , not walk , to the nearest exit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Please list any and all, current personal or business websites..."

Really?
Even if they can justify asking for personal information, business websites could include things like previous employer intranet logins, personal bank accounts, etc.
If presented with a job application that included this kind of stuff, I would run, not walk, to the nearest exit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384379</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>ween14</author>
	<datestamp>1245337260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And how does that make it any better then of it was on the job application. Would it be reasonable for the city to ask for a copy of the keys to your house so they can search it? That would be similar to the concept of allowing them access to your "private" web accounts. What I do in public is perfectly fine for them to examine, but what I do in private is not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And how does that make it any better then of it was on the job application .
Would it be reasonable for the city to ask for a copy of the keys to your house so they can search it ?
That would be similar to the concept of allowing them access to your " private " web accounts .
What I do in public is perfectly fine for them to examine , but what I do in private is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how does that make it any better then of it was on the job application.
Would it be reasonable for the city to ask for a copy of the keys to your house so they can search it?
That would be similar to the concept of allowing them access to your "private" web accounts.
What I do in public is perfectly fine for them to examine, but what I do in private is not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379605</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1245315900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I honestly couldn't care less if an employer <i>asks</i> for my account information -- even passwords.  However, the answer I'm likely to give goes something like, &quot;MYOFB.&quot;
<br> <br>
If they REQUIRE that information, then the answer becomes &quot;Go screw.&quot;</htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly could n't care less if an employer asks for my account information -- even passwords .
However , the answer I 'm likely to give goes something like , " MYOFB .
" If they REQUIRE that information , then the answer becomes " Go screw .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly couldn't care less if an employer asks for my account information -- even passwords.
However, the answer I'm likely to give goes something like, "MYOFB.
"
 
If they REQUIRE that information, then the answer becomes "Go screw.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377859</id>
	<title>That's the big deal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always use the same screen name, "biteme" and the password, "fuckoff42".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always use the same screen name , " biteme " and the password , " fuckoff42 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always use the same screen name, "biteme" and the password, "fuckoff42".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378915</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>Xiterion</author>
	<datestamp>1245357060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, how did you work an "in these hard times" into that post?!  Can we please get past the constant mourning of not experiencing bubble-driven economic growth, or is this going to be another thing like "in this post 9-11 world?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , how did you work an " in these hard times " into that post ? !
Can we please get past the constant mourning of not experiencing bubble-driven economic growth , or is this going to be another thing like " in this post 9-11 world ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, how did you work an "in these hard times" into that post?!
Can we please get past the constant mourning of not experiencing bubble-driven economic growth, or is this going to be another thing like "in this post 9-11 world?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380347</id>
	<title>Ah, Montana...</title>
	<author>ismism</author>
	<datestamp>1245318360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where the men are men, the women are men, and the sheep apply for city jobs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where the men are men , the women are men , and the sheep apply for city jobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where the men are men, the women are men, and the sheep apply for city jobs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377937</id>
	<title>Heh.. this is rich.</title>
	<author>JayPee</author>
	<datestamp>1245354420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Judging from a past encounter with a guy claiming to be a firefighter in Bozeman, I now wondering if they've been having problems with city employees posting questionable material.   A while back I got into a bit of an argument with some guy claiming to be a firefighter from Bozeman, MT when he posted some racist garbage about President Obama on a friend's Facebook wall.</p><p>I still have a screen shot of it and I'm now tempted for forward it along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging from a past encounter with a guy claiming to be a firefighter in Bozeman , I now wondering if they 've been having problems with city employees posting questionable material .
A while back I got into a bit of an argument with some guy claiming to be a firefighter from Bozeman , MT when he posted some racist garbage about President Obama on a friend 's Facebook wall.I still have a screen shot of it and I 'm now tempted for forward it along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging from a past encounter with a guy claiming to be a firefighter in Bozeman, I now wondering if they've been having problems with city employees posting questionable material.
A while back I got into a bit of an argument with some guy claiming to be a firefighter from Bozeman, MT when he posted some racist garbage about President Obama on a friend's Facebook wall.I still have a screen shot of it and I'm now tempted for forward it along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377513</id>
	<title>They are testing how you leak city information too</title>
	<author>dUb</author>
	<datestamp>1245353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if City is just testing their people how easily they give information which is related to their work on City?<br>If you give, you fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if City is just testing their people how easily they give information which is related to their work on City ? If you give , you fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if City is just testing their people how easily they give information which is related to their work on City?If you give, you fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367</id>
	<title>My Klingon Keyboard</title>
	<author>iron-kurton</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just told them that even if I wrote down passwords, they are all written in Klingon and are only usable on Klingon keyboards, so they would be of no use to them.  I was hired on the spot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just told them that even if I wrote down passwords , they are all written in Klingon and are only usable on Klingon keyboards , so they would be of no use to them .
I was hired on the spot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just told them that even if I wrote down passwords, they are all written in Klingon and are only usable on Klingon keyboards, so they would be of no use to them.
I was hired on the spot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380495</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1245318960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"They're only going to get really, really stupid applicants..."</p><p>You mean the same type of people who dreamed up this policy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They 're only going to get really , really stupid applicants... " You mean the same type of people who dreamed up this policy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They're only going to get really, really stupid applicants..."You mean the same type of people who dreamed up this policy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381977</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>skarphace</author>
	<datestamp>1245325200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The FOIA only applies to the federal government.  You're looking for <a href="http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Montana\_Public\_Records\_Act" title="sunshinereview.org">Montana Public Records Act</a> [sunshinereview.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The FOIA only applies to the federal government .
You 're looking for Montana Public Records Act [ sunshinereview.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The FOIA only applies to the federal government.
You're looking for Montana Public Records Act [sunshinereview.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389567</id>
	<title>Re:You know what to do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245424740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI, The staff contact page for their legal department is now BLANK! *HA!* http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/staff.aspx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI , The staff contact page for their legal department is now BLANK !
* HA ! * http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/staff.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI, The staff contact page for their legal department is now BLANK!
*HA!* http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/staff.aspx</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384319</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>JayAEU</author>
	<datestamp>1245336900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In addition, most of the sites explicitly disallow sharing your account information (especially passwords) in their terms of service. Maybe you'll get the job, but you'll lose your accounts...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition , most of the sites explicitly disallow sharing your account information ( especially passwords ) in their terms of service .
Maybe you 'll get the job , but you 'll lose your accounts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition, most of the sites explicitly disallow sharing your account information (especially passwords) in their terms of service.
Maybe you'll get the job, but you'll lose your accounts...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386181</id>
	<title>Holy Shit!!???</title>
	<author>WCVanHorne</author>
	<datestamp>1245354780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can anyone even consider asking for, let alone releasing private account credentials?

I can't even conceive filling this out and have *never* heard of this being asked of anyone.

Why don't they ask for transcripts of every rant you've had in a bar, every letter to the editor you've written, all you private correspondence, etc......

Did anyone watch the interview with the clueless attorney and off camera HR person.  I'm just aghast at the ignorance and presumption.

I'm pretty much at a loss for any further words.  Sad how far the land of individual freedom and rights has sunk.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can anyone even consider asking for , let alone releasing private account credentials ?
I ca n't even conceive filling this out and have * never * heard of this being asked of anyone .
Why do n't they ask for transcripts of every rant you 've had in a bar , every letter to the editor you 've written , all you private correspondence , etc..... . Did anyone watch the interview with the clueless attorney and off camera HR person .
I 'm just aghast at the ignorance and presumption .
I 'm pretty much at a loss for any further words .
Sad how far the land of individual freedom and rights has sunk .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can anyone even consider asking for, let alone releasing private account credentials?
I can't even conceive filling this out and have *never* heard of this being asked of anyone.
Why don't they ask for transcripts of every rant you've had in a bar, every letter to the editor you've written, all you private correspondence, etc......

Did anyone watch the interview with the clueless attorney and off camera HR person.
I'm just aghast at the ignorance and presumption.
I'm pretty much at a loss for any further words.
Sad how far the land of individual freedom and rights has sunk.
:(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28387125</id>
	<title>Boozeman is the right name</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1245408600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only explanation for this is that they must have been drinking heavily.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only explanation for this is that they must have been drinking heavily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only explanation for this is that they must have been drinking heavily.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383995</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>akgooseman</author>
	<datestamp>1245334680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters, that much is true. But that's still a far cry from having a private fire department.</p> </div><p>Many of those volunteer fire departments are private corporations. Private, not-for-profit corporations, but private nonetheless. They contract with the local government to provide fire and/or EMS service. Private non-profit emergency services can often provide a lot more bang for the buck than direct municipal/county services can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters , that much is true .
But that 's still a far cry from having a private fire department .
Many of those volunteer fire departments are private corporations .
Private , not-for-profit corporations , but private nonetheless .
They contract with the local government to provide fire and/or EMS service .
Private non-profit emergency services can often provide a lot more bang for the buck than direct municipal/county services can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many fire depts have volunteer firefighters, that much is true.
But that's still a far cry from having a private fire department.
Many of those volunteer fire departments are private corporations.
Private, not-for-profit corporations, but private nonetheless.
They contract with the local government to provide fire and/or EMS service.
Private non-profit emergency services can often provide a lot more bang for the buck than direct municipal/county services can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378409</id>
	<title>Re:Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245355680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>For example, Facebook's Terms section 4 item 6 states "You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account."</i> <br>
<br>
Ironic since one of the first things that Facebook asks you when signing up is the login and password to your email account so they can scour your address book and send emails to everyone letting them know you signed up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For example , Facebook 's Terms section 4 item 6 states " You will not share your password , let anyone else access your account , or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account .
" Ironic since one of the first things that Facebook asks you when signing up is the login and password to your email account so they can scour your address book and send emails to everyone letting them know you signed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example, Facebook's Terms section 4 item 6 states "You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
" 

Ironic since one of the first things that Facebook asks you when signing up is the login and password to your email account so they can scour your address book and send emails to everyone letting them know you signed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380705</id>
	<title>Re:Past experience - healthcare records</title>
	<author>Spaham</author>
	<datestamp>1245319800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>don't worry, only inmates will look at it while processing the forms<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do n't worry , only inmates will look at it while processing the forms : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>don't worry, only inmates will look at it while processing the forms :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378167</id>
	<title>Check the form, they really do ask for that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245355080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Check the form, they really do ask for that.

<a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_MASTER.pdf" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_MASTER.pdf</a> [bozeman.net]
or
<a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_Interview\_MASTER.pdf" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_Interview\_MASTER.pdf</a> [bozeman.net]

"Please list any and all, past and present, personal or business website or web pages, memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check the form , they really do ask for that .
http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background \ _Check \ _Form \ _MASTER.pdf [ bozeman.net ] or http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background \ _Check \ _Form \ _Interview \ _MASTER.pdf [ bozeman.net ] " Please list any and all , past and present , personal or business website or web pages , memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms , social clubs or forums , to include but not limited to : Facebook , Google , Yahoo , YouTube.com , MySpace , etc .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check the form, they really do ask for that.
http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_MASTER.pdf [bozeman.net]
or
http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_Interview\_MASTER.pdf [bozeman.net]

"Please list any and all, past and present, personal or business website or web pages, memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385297</id>
	<title>Intelligence Test?</title>
	<author>udoschuermann</author>
	<datestamp>1245346380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe anyone dumb enough to furnish that kind of information will not be hired? And have their identity stolen as they deserve, no doubt? To me that sounds like a cunning plan to hire smart people, those who leave that section blank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe anyone dumb enough to furnish that kind of information will not be hired ?
And have their identity stolen as they deserve , no doubt ?
To me that sounds like a cunning plan to hire smart people , those who leave that section blank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe anyone dumb enough to furnish that kind of information will not be hired?
And have their identity stolen as they deserve, no doubt?
To me that sounds like a cunning plan to hire smart people, those who leave that section blank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Sir\_Kurt</author>
	<datestamp>1245356460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They might as well have asked for the keys to your house, the combination of your safe, and all your banking account info. They didn't do that because it is well understood that this is wrong. I bet the form and policy were made up by someone who's only exposure to social networking sites was over the shoulders of their kids. And this is probably where the idea of asking for passwords came from.</p><p>Kurt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They might as well have asked for the keys to your house , the combination of your safe , and all your banking account info .
They did n't do that because it is well understood that this is wrong .
I bet the form and policy were made up by someone who 's only exposure to social networking sites was over the shoulders of their kids .
And this is probably where the idea of asking for passwords came from.Kurt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They might as well have asked for the keys to your house, the combination of your safe, and all your banking account info.
They didn't do that because it is well understood that this is wrong.
I bet the form and policy were made up by someone who's only exposure to social networking sites was over the shoulders of their kids.
And this is probably where the idea of asking for passwords came from.Kurt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382985</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1245329640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, </i></p><p>I wouldn't make that claim.  The key difference between the private and the public sectors is that incompetence in the private sector results in correction:  incompetent organizations go out of business.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better , I would n't make that claim .
The key difference between the private and the public sectors is that incompetence in the private sector results in correction : incompetent organizations go out of business.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, I wouldn't make that claim.
The key difference between the private and the public sectors is that incompetence in the private sector results in correction:  incompetent organizations go out of business.-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28402293</id>
	<title>Re:Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245516660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fuck the TOS who gives a shit what it says. "rules".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck the TOS who gives a shit what it says .
" rules " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck the TOS who gives a shit what it says.
"rules".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377567</id>
	<title>The City "Attorney"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>City attorney Greg Sullivan gets bonus points for starting every sentence in the interview with the word "so."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>City attorney Greg Sullivan gets bonus points for starting every sentence in the interview with the word " so .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>City attorney Greg Sullivan gets bonus points for starting every sentence in the interview with the word "so.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392417</id>
	<title>NYFB works for me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245436860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've done it before and I'll do it again. NYFB is a perfectly acceptable response on a job application.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've done it before and I 'll do it again .
NYFB is a perfectly acceptable response on a job application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've done it before and I'll do it again.
NYFB is a perfectly acceptable response on a job application.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378797</id>
	<title>Sysadmins don't ask for passwords</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245356700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they just change them arbitrarily, and if you are lucky enough, they will tell you that your password has been changed.</p><p>Sysadmins are the only people who could ever truly need to know your password, and I've been bagering my friends for years to not even give it to them.  I remember for years a tenth of the battle.net window would be a warning telling people the same thing.</p><p>Now, just wait until other companies get wind of the give-us-your-passwords-if-you-want-the-job idea...<br>or better yet, your credit card numbers, security codes, and expiry dates...</p><p>you know... for "credit checks"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they just change them arbitrarily , and if you are lucky enough , they will tell you that your password has been changed.Sysadmins are the only people who could ever truly need to know your password , and I 've been bagering my friends for years to not even give it to them .
I remember for years a tenth of the battle.net window would be a warning telling people the same thing.Now , just wait until other companies get wind of the give-us-your-passwords-if-you-want-the-job idea...or better yet , your credit card numbers , security codes , and expiry dates...you know... for " credit checks "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they just change them arbitrarily, and if you are lucky enough, they will tell you that your password has been changed.Sysadmins are the only people who could ever truly need to know your password, and I've been bagering my friends for years to not even give it to them.
I remember for years a tenth of the battle.net window would be a warning telling people the same thing.Now, just wait until other companies get wind of the give-us-your-passwords-if-you-want-the-job idea...or better yet, your credit card numbers, security codes, and expiry dates...you know... for "credit checks"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396355</id>
	<title>URGENT CALL TO ACTION: Tell Bozeman you object to</title>
	<author>joelevi</author>
	<datestamp>1245408720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bozeman is having a City Commission Meeting Monday, June 22nd. We need to get as many people writing emails to them as possible to let them know this is unacceptable and ask them to reverse their policy.

I've contacted the City Clerk's office and have learned that EVERY email that we send with the words "PUBLIC COMMENT" in the subject will be printed and a copy given to each Commissioner and the Mayor. How many REAMS of paper can we get stacked on their desks in time for the City Commission Meeting? I've sent mine!

The address, names, and a sample letter are available here: <a href="http://bit.ly/ZBCxa" title="bit.ly" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ZBCxa</a> [bit.ly]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bozeman is having a City Commission Meeting Monday , June 22nd .
We need to get as many people writing emails to them as possible to let them know this is unacceptable and ask them to reverse their policy .
I 've contacted the City Clerk 's office and have learned that EVERY email that we send with the words " PUBLIC COMMENT " in the subject will be printed and a copy given to each Commissioner and the Mayor .
How many REAMS of paper can we get stacked on their desks in time for the City Commission Meeting ?
I 've sent mine !
The address , names , and a sample letter are available here : http : //bit.ly/ZBCxa [ bit.ly ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bozeman is having a City Commission Meeting Monday, June 22nd.
We need to get as many people writing emails to them as possible to let them know this is unacceptable and ask them to reverse their policy.
I've contacted the City Clerk's office and have learned that EVERY email that we send with the words "PUBLIC COMMENT" in the subject will be printed and a copy given to each Commissioner and the Mayor.
How many REAMS of paper can we get stacked on their desks in time for the City Commission Meeting?
I've sent mine!
The address, names, and a sample letter are available here: http://bit.ly/ZBCxa [bit.ly]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377861</id>
	<title>Legal for appointees, not for civil servants</title>
	<author>sirwired</author>
	<datestamp>1245354300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me first say that it is obvious that the request is over-broad.  I can't imagine anybody turning over their complete passwords; I certainly wouldn't.  However, for political appointees, a request to reveal your online "handle"(s) is both legal and common.  If you are going for a political job, it makes perfect sense to make sure your appointees don't have publicly accessible views incompatible with your administration.</p><p>However, for civil servants, yeah... tell them to go jump in a lake.  The request for information on your personal life is none of their business, and probably highly illegal.  It is not a problem, nor is it relevant, if an assistant librarian hangs out with the local Klan after hours.  It <i>would</i> be relevant for the mayor's chief of staff though...</p><p>SirWired</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me first say that it is obvious that the request is over-broad .
I ca n't imagine anybody turning over their complete passwords ; I certainly would n't .
However , for political appointees , a request to reveal your online " handle " ( s ) is both legal and common .
If you are going for a political job , it makes perfect sense to make sure your appointees do n't have publicly accessible views incompatible with your administration.However , for civil servants , yeah... tell them to go jump in a lake .
The request for information on your personal life is none of their business , and probably highly illegal .
It is not a problem , nor is it relevant , if an assistant librarian hangs out with the local Klan after hours .
It would be relevant for the mayor 's chief of staff though...SirWired</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me first say that it is obvious that the request is over-broad.
I can't imagine anybody turning over their complete passwords; I certainly wouldn't.
However, for political appointees, a request to reveal your online "handle"(s) is both legal and common.
If you are going for a political job, it makes perfect sense to make sure your appointees don't have publicly accessible views incompatible with your administration.However, for civil servants, yeah... tell them to go jump in a lake.
The request for information on your personal life is none of their business, and probably highly illegal.
It is not a problem, nor is it relevant, if an assistant librarian hangs out with the local Klan after hours.
It would be relevant for the mayor's chief of staff though...SirWired</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381767</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>brasscount</author>
	<datestamp>1245324240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bozeman will likely get it when no one under 50 applies for a job, and no one in IT applies for a position at all.  Soon, either the hiring practice will change, or the town will begin paying ridonculous sums, since they are "not getting applicants".  At which point it is palatable to use a throwaway email address, and social networking account or two, take the job, and have the HR moron terminated for surfing porn at work.  Afterall, his or her passwords will be kept somewhere in writing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bozeman will likely get it when no one under 50 applies for a job , and no one in IT applies for a position at all .
Soon , either the hiring practice will change , or the town will begin paying ridonculous sums , since they are " not getting applicants " .
At which point it is palatable to use a throwaway email address , and social networking account or two , take the job , and have the HR moron terminated for surfing porn at work .
Afterall , his or her passwords will be kept somewhere in writing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bozeman will likely get it when no one under 50 applies for a job, and no one in IT applies for a position at all.
Soon, either the hiring practice will change, or the town will begin paying ridonculous sums, since they are "not getting applicants".
At which point it is palatable to use a throwaway email address, and social networking account or two, take the job, and have the HR moron terminated for surfing porn at work.
Afterall, his or her passwords will be kept somewhere in writing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</id>
	<title>What else?</title>
	<author>swb</author>
	<datestamp>1245353160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe my bank access info?</p><p>Keys to my house?</p><p>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe my bank access info ? Keys to my house ? Maybe a beaver shot of my wife ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe my bank access info?Keys to my house?Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377827</id>
	<title>You used to be cool, Bozeman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, wtf? First you tried getting red light cameras (Which was quickly killed off by the state), and now this. What happened?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , wtf ?
First you tried getting red light cameras ( Which was quickly killed off by the state ) , and now this .
What happened ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, wtf?
First you tried getting red light cameras (Which was quickly killed off by the state), and now this.
What happened?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379159</id>
	<title>Whats the internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245357840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just write that down in response to request for passwords to your accounts on the "internet"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just write that down in response to request for passwords to your accounts on the " internet "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just write that down in response to request for passwords to your accounts on the "internet"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384959</id>
	<title>Change your passwords?</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1245341580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the form say anything about not changing your password? I suppose one could write down their passwords, and then since those accounts were compromised, immediately change the password when you got home. They can't possibly make you sign something forbidding you from changing your password.... or can they?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the form say anything about not changing your password ?
I suppose one could write down their passwords , and then since those accounts were compromised , immediately change the password when you got home .
They ca n't possibly make you sign something forbidding you from changing your password.... or can they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the form say anything about not changing your password?
I suppose one could write down their passwords, and then since those accounts were compromised, immediately change the password when you got home.
They can't possibly make you sign something forbidding you from changing your password.... or can they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381063</id>
	<title>Re:You know what to do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245321240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the City Attorney will post all of his user names and passwords publicly when he's up for reelection. That way his constituents can do background checks on him before they vote.</p><p>Somehow I think he won't do that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the City Attorney will post all of his user names and passwords publicly when he 's up for reelection .
That way his constituents can do background checks on him before they vote.Somehow I think he wo n't do that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the City Attorney will post all of his user names and passwords publicly when he's up for reelection.
That way his constituents can do background checks on him before they vote.Somehow I think he won't do that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389787</id>
	<title>Solution inbound...</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1245425640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I don't have internet and email... what is this 'youtu-..." thing?"</p><p>C'mon, grow some brains...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't have internet and email... what is this 'youtu-... " thing ?
" C'mon , grow some brains.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't have internet and email... what is this 'youtu-..." thing?
"C'mon, grow some brains...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379989</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you should tell them. <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/contacts.aspx" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow"> www.bozeman.net/ bozeman/ humanResource/ contacts.aspx</a> [bozeman.net] is their contact page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should tell them .
www.bozeman.net/ bozeman/ humanResource/ contacts.aspx [ bozeman.net ] is their contact page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should tell them.
www.bozeman.net/ bozeman/ humanResource/ contacts.aspx [bozeman.net] is their contact page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377273</id>
	<title>Um, No</title>
	<author>orrigami</author>
	<datestamp>1245352740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Guess no Slashdotter is ever going to work for the City of Bozeman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess no Slashdotter is ever going to work for the City of Bozeman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess no Slashdotter is ever going to work for the City of Bozeman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379587</id>
	<title>Ok...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1245315840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok...So, lets pretend I am currently constructing an entirely creative re-creation of myself on social networking sites, from the e-mail up. I am not using my real name in any way, nor am I using anything that directly links me by any official identification. I am phrasing everything in such a way that the nickname I use sounds like it is from me, but ambiguous enough to provide some plausible deniability.</p><p>Would I be breaking any laws if I provided these addresses/passwords to a potential (and eventual) employer? Would I simply be subject to a brisk firing, or would laws be broken and penalties possibly applied?</p><p>It seems to me that this rediculous behavior, on the part of these City Stooges, could simply be countered by everyone using social networking sites to glorify themselves. Eventually employers would realize this was happening and no longer bother to check them.</p><p>Or, alternatively, not create the accounts in the first place...or not apply for jobs in Bozeman, Montana.</p><p>Good luck with that, Cowboys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok...So , lets pretend I am currently constructing an entirely creative re-creation of myself on social networking sites , from the e-mail up .
I am not using my real name in any way , nor am I using anything that directly links me by any official identification .
I am phrasing everything in such a way that the nickname I use sounds like it is from me , but ambiguous enough to provide some plausible deniability.Would I be breaking any laws if I provided these addresses/passwords to a potential ( and eventual ) employer ?
Would I simply be subject to a brisk firing , or would laws be broken and penalties possibly applied ? It seems to me that this rediculous behavior , on the part of these City Stooges , could simply be countered by everyone using social networking sites to glorify themselves .
Eventually employers would realize this was happening and no longer bother to check them.Or , alternatively , not create the accounts in the first place...or not apply for jobs in Bozeman , Montana.Good luck with that , Cowboys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok...So, lets pretend I am currently constructing an entirely creative re-creation of myself on social networking sites, from the e-mail up.
I am not using my real name in any way, nor am I using anything that directly links me by any official identification.
I am phrasing everything in such a way that the nickname I use sounds like it is from me, but ambiguous enough to provide some plausible deniability.Would I be breaking any laws if I provided these addresses/passwords to a potential (and eventual) employer?
Would I simply be subject to a brisk firing, or would laws be broken and penalties possibly applied?It seems to me that this rediculous behavior, on the part of these City Stooges, could simply be countered by everyone using social networking sites to glorify themselves.
Eventually employers would realize this was happening and no longer bother to check them.Or, alternatively, not create the accounts in the first place...or not apply for jobs in Bozeman, Montana.Good luck with that, Cowboys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519</id>
	<title>Past experience - healthcare records</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The potential for misuse is absolutely incredible. I recall reading many events during which folks at the US Social Security Administration were looking up political candidates' records, where hospital employees in Los Angeles were looking up the medical records of celebrities that visited their hospital for care.</p><p>Now they want me to let the HR drones have the ability to log into my facebook, slashdot, etc accounts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The potential for misuse is absolutely incredible .
I recall reading many events during which folks at the US Social Security Administration were looking up political candidates ' records , where hospital employees in Los Angeles were looking up the medical records of celebrities that visited their hospital for care.Now they want me to let the HR drones have the ability to log into my facebook , slashdot , etc accounts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The potential for misuse is absolutely incredible.
I recall reading many events during which folks at the US Social Security Administration were looking up political candidates' records, where hospital employees in Los Angeles were looking up the medical records of celebrities that visited their hospital for care.Now they want me to let the HR drones have the ability to log into my facebook, slashdot, etc accounts?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378217</id>
	<title>Someone will get fired</title>
	<author>hurfy</author>
	<datestamp>1245355200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either i get fired for not disclosing them</p><p>or</p><p>Someone already there gets fired because i did and they were stupid enough to check on the NSFW sites i belong to.....</p><p>Perhaps the HR dept could sue the city for making them view the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...............</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either i get fired for not disclosing themorSomeone already there gets fired because i did and they were stupid enough to check on the NSFW sites i belong to.....Perhaps the HR dept could sue the city for making them view the .............. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either i get fired for not disclosing themorSomeone already there gets fired because i did and they were stupid enough to check on the NSFW sites i belong to.....Perhaps the HR dept could sue the city for making them view the ...............</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>bagorange</author>
	<datestamp>1245353340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>as someone on boingboing pointed out, can we assume that this breaks terms of service for quite a lot of groups / websites?

<p>are they genuinely fishing for stuff to exclude applications from consideration? Or just looking for an excuse to fire you later because you didn't disclose all of your online activities?</p><p>perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say "in secret". They ask you for it so they can vet you, and you hid stuff from em; so they are not liable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as someone on boingboing pointed out , can we assume that this breaks terms of service for quite a lot of groups / websites ?
are they genuinely fishing for stuff to exclude applications from consideration ?
Or just looking for an excuse to fire you later because you did n't disclose all of your online activities ? perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say " in secret " .
They ask you for it so they can vet you , and you hid stuff from em ; so they are not liable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as someone on boingboing pointed out, can we assume that this breaks terms of service for quite a lot of groups / websites?
are they genuinely fishing for stuff to exclude applications from consideration?
Or just looking for an excuse to fire you later because you didn't disclose all of your online activities?perhaps trying to avoid employer liability for stuff you say "in secret".
They ask you for it so they can vet you, and you hid stuff from em; so they are not liable?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379437</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1245358680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's where neighborhood watches come into play, when someone calls 911 or some security company number, and when uniforms and lights/siren-topped vehicles appear, some crime (but not all crime) can be or is deterred.</p><p>To say (in blanket fashion) that the police don't help because the damage is done is a little bit over the top. The police are not just REactive... there are times when the police can be PROactive, and even when reactive, they can still contain or prevent damage, especially when well-placed, well-protected confidential informants regularly provide information. Sometimes, the police/law enforcement act as the CI (legally or illegally)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's where neighborhood watches come into play , when someone calls 911 or some security company number , and when uniforms and lights/siren-topped vehicles appear , some crime ( but not all crime ) can be or is deterred.To say ( in blanket fashion ) that the police do n't help because the damage is done is a little bit over the top .
The police are not just REactive... there are times when the police can be PROactive , and even when reactive , they can still contain or prevent damage , especially when well-placed , well-protected confidential informants regularly provide information .
Sometimes , the police/law enforcement act as the CI ( legally or illegally ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's where neighborhood watches come into play, when someone calls 911 or some security company number, and when uniforms and lights/siren-topped vehicles appear, some crime (but not all crime) can be or is deterred.To say (in blanket fashion) that the police don't help because the damage is done is a little bit over the top.
The police are not just REactive... there are times when the police can be PROactive, and even when reactive, they can still contain or prevent damage, especially when well-placed, well-protected confidential informants regularly provide information.
Sometimes, the police/law enforcement act as the CI (legally or illegally)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28390391</id>
	<title>Bozeman - longstanding source of bizarre news</title>
	<author>skinfaxi</author>
	<datestamp>1245428040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A friend of mine runs an email news letter and Bozeman police reports have been a regular feature for years. Here's a sample from today:<blockquote><div><p>* A man was outside a woman's home on Rose Street yelling and screaming around 1 a.m. She said he took off running.
</p><p>
* Police gave an intoxicated man a ride home after he knocked continuously on the door of a residence on West Harrison Street around 3 a.m. He was cold and wanted to come inside. The homeowner did not wish to press charges.
</p><p>
* A yellow lab was "dumpster diving" while tied up on the pool deck at the swim center on Church Avenue.
</p><p>
* An animal, believed to be a fox, was struck by a vehicle and needed to be killed. It turned out to be a skunk and was dead when an officer arrived.
</p><p>
* A man had questions about breaking up with an "abusive, crazy girlfriend."
</p><p>
* A man with a Russian accent called another man and accused him of flirting with his wife.
</p><p>
The Gallatin County Sheriff's Office reports for Wednesday included the following:
</p><p>
* Two 15-year-old males were trying to take beer at a store on Norris Road around 2:30 a.m. One of the boys had come into the store with this shirt over his head and the caller was concerned that they "were up to no good."
</p><p>
* A family was stuck behind a locked gate near a new golf course on Jack Creek Road in Madison County.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

These aren't cherry-picked. It's <i>always</i> like that. Who <b>wouldn't</b> want to work there?
</p><p>
<a href="http://bozemandailychronicle.com/police\_reports/" title="bozemandai...onicle.com" rel="nofollow">http://bozemandailychronicle.com/police\_reports/</a> [bozemandai...onicle.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A friend of mine runs an email news letter and Bozeman police reports have been a regular feature for years .
Here 's a sample from today : * A man was outside a woman 's home on Rose Street yelling and screaming around 1 a.m. She said he took off running .
* Police gave an intoxicated man a ride home after he knocked continuously on the door of a residence on West Harrison Street around 3 a.m. He was cold and wanted to come inside .
The homeowner did not wish to press charges .
* A yellow lab was " dumpster diving " while tied up on the pool deck at the swim center on Church Avenue .
* An animal , believed to be a fox , was struck by a vehicle and needed to be killed .
It turned out to be a skunk and was dead when an officer arrived .
* A man had questions about breaking up with an " abusive , crazy girlfriend .
" * A man with a Russian accent called another man and accused him of flirting with his wife .
The Gallatin County Sheriff 's Office reports for Wednesday included the following : * Two 15-year-old males were trying to take beer at a store on Norris Road around 2 : 30 a.m. One of the boys had come into the store with this shirt over his head and the caller was concerned that they " were up to no good .
" * A family was stuck behind a locked gate near a new golf course on Jack Creek Road in Madison County .
These are n't cherry-picked .
It 's always like that .
Who would n't want to work there ?
http : //bozemandailychronicle.com/police \ _reports/ [ bozemandai...onicle.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A friend of mine runs an email news letter and Bozeman police reports have been a regular feature for years.
Here's a sample from today:* A man was outside a woman's home on Rose Street yelling and screaming around 1 a.m. She said he took off running.
* Police gave an intoxicated man a ride home after he knocked continuously on the door of a residence on West Harrison Street around 3 a.m. He was cold and wanted to come inside.
The homeowner did not wish to press charges.
* A yellow lab was "dumpster diving" while tied up on the pool deck at the swim center on Church Avenue.
* An animal, believed to be a fox, was struck by a vehicle and needed to be killed.
It turned out to be a skunk and was dead when an officer arrived.
* A man had questions about breaking up with an "abusive, crazy girlfriend.
"

* A man with a Russian accent called another man and accused him of flirting with his wife.
The Gallatin County Sheriff's Office reports for Wednesday included the following:

* Two 15-year-old males were trying to take beer at a store on Norris Road around 2:30 a.m. One of the boys had come into the store with this shirt over his head and the caller was concerned that they "were up to no good.
"

* A family was stuck behind a locked gate near a new golf course on Jack Creek Road in Madison County.
These aren't cherry-picked.
It's always like that.
Who wouldn't want to work there?
http://bozemandailychronicle.com/police\_reports/ [bozemandai...onicle.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379345</id>
	<title>How ironic!</title>
	<author>djeaux</author>
	<datestamp>1245358380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering that Montana is ground zero for right wing militia types (as well as pygmy pony &amp; dental floss farmers).

I think a lot of folks need to screw their heads back on, wake up &amp; realize that it's the right-wing &amp; not the left that poses the greatest threat to their privacy.  Somebody up-thread asked if this was China.  Nope, but it sure looks like Munich circa 1931.

I'll betcha a dime to a doughnut that's a Republican city administration.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that Montana is ground zero for right wing militia types ( as well as pygmy pony &amp; dental floss farmers ) .
I think a lot of folks need to screw their heads back on , wake up &amp; realize that it 's the right-wing &amp; not the left that poses the greatest threat to their privacy .
Somebody up-thread asked if this was China .
Nope , but it sure looks like Munich circa 1931 .
I 'll betcha a dime to a doughnut that 's a Republican city administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that Montana is ground zero for right wing militia types (as well as pygmy pony &amp; dental floss farmers).
I think a lot of folks need to screw their heads back on, wake up &amp; realize that it's the right-wing &amp; not the left that poses the greatest threat to their privacy.
Somebody up-thread asked if this was China.
Nope, but it sure looks like Munich circa 1931.
I'll betcha a dime to a doughnut that's a Republican city administration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386987</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1245406980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Until the mid 1850s, most roads in Britain were privately owned toll roads.  It worked perfectly well, as indeed do privately owned toll roads in various parts of Europe today.  Rawls has quite a lot to say, most of it worth hearing, about the interface between public goods and private supply.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Until the mid 1850s , most roads in Britain were privately owned toll roads .
It worked perfectly well , as indeed do privately owned toll roads in various parts of Europe today .
Rawls has quite a lot to say , most of it worth hearing , about the interface between public goods and private supply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until the mid 1850s, most roads in Britain were privately owned toll roads.
It worked perfectly well, as indeed do privately owned toll roads in various parts of Europe today.
Rawls has quite a lot to say, most of it worth hearing, about the interface between public goods and private supply.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377583</id>
	<title>Go right ahead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give'em that, turn around, sue their behinds off. Looks like homer to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give'em that , turn around , sue their behinds off .
Looks like homer to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give'em that, turn around, sue their behinds off.
Looks like homer to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381955</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245325080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>In accordance with Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 9, I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including myself.</i> <br> <br>In otherwords, by signing below I acknowledge that Bozeman WILL violate my rights by refusing to provide me with a copy of review which they freely admit I have a constitutional right to review... AND I'm ok with that.<br> <br>
WTF?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In accordance with Montana Constitution , Article II , Section 9 , I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process ; however , by signing below , I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person , including myself .
In otherwords , by signing below I acknowledge that Bozeman WILL violate my rights by refusing to provide me with a copy of review which they freely admit I have a constitutional right to review... AND I 'm ok with that .
WTF ? ! ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In accordance with Montana Constitution, Article II, Section 9, I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including myself.
In otherwords, by signing below I acknowledge that Bozeman WILL violate my rights by refusing to provide me with a copy of review which they freely admit I have a constitutional right to review... AND I'm ok with that.
WTF?!?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381477</id>
	<title>Open ended background checks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245322980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is as bad as applications requiring that you agree to open-ended background checks. As in, "FOREVER". (walk away)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is as bad as applications requiring that you agree to open-ended background checks .
As in , " FOREVER " .
( walk away )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is as bad as applications requiring that you agree to open-ended background checks.
As in, "FOREVER".
(walk away)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379493</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245315600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would not like to work in security for them. I can't even begin to imagine what kind of suckers would work at a place like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would not like to work in security for them .
I ca n't even begin to imagine what kind of suckers would work at a place like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would not like to work in security for them.
I can't even begin to imagine what kind of suckers would work at a place like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380233</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>khellendros1984</author>
	<datestamp>1245317880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I might write a lot of intensely embarrassing (and incorrect) things in the password sections.....either that, or ask for a stack of papers to have enough spaces for every site I've registered at, and misspell all the usernames by exactly one character...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I might write a lot of intensely embarrassing ( and incorrect ) things in the password sections.....either that , or ask for a stack of papers to have enough spaces for every site I 've registered at , and misspell all the usernames by exactly one character.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I might write a lot of intensely embarrassing (and incorrect) things in the password sections.....either that, or ask for a stack of papers to have enough spaces for every site I've registered at, and misspell all the usernames by exactly one character...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377357</id>
	<title>Real Opportunity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Create Account with social site<br>2. Put name and password on app<br>3. Wait for it to be leaked and abused<br>4. Profit!</p><p>No need to get a job - this is like money in the bank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Create Account with social site2 .
Put name and password on app3 .
Wait for it to be leaked and abused4 .
Profit ! No need to get a job - this is like money in the bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Create Account with social site2.
Put name and password on app3.
Wait for it to be leaked and abused4.
Profit!No need to get a job - this is like money in the bank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378747</id>
	<title>profit!</title>
	<author>bugi</author>
	<datestamp>1245356580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. apply for job, omitting that section<br>2. not get hired<br>3. sue for discrimination against people of intelligence<br>4. profit: receive large settlement</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1. apply for job , omitting that section2 .
not get hired3 .
sue for discrimination against people of intelligence4 .
profit : receive large settlement</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1. apply for job, omitting that section2.
not get hired3.
sue for discrimination against people of intelligence4.
profit: receive large settlement</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379913</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, we are going to have to let you go.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those darn typos.  Gets me every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those darn typos .
Gets me every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those darn typos.
Gets me every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</id>
	<title>Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1245353160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a LOT of stuff that prospective employers <a href="http://www.hrworld.com/features/30-interview-questions-111507/" title="hrworld.com">can't ask you</a> [hrworld.com] (race, sex, family status, disability, etc.). One of those things is asking you about social organizations you belong to (presumably because someone could derrive illegal information from this like your age, nationality, religion, etc.). Asking for your Facebook/Myspace/etc. information would almost CERTAINLY fall under this (since things like age/sex/etc. are standard categories on most social websites, and this information is supposed to be basically anonymous) and is really opening them up for a rather impolite visit from the <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/" title="eeoc.gov">EEOC</a> [eeoc.gov].
</p><p>
I suspect that, in these hard times, it's just that no one has bothered to file a claim against them yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a LOT of stuff that prospective employers ca n't ask you [ hrworld.com ] ( race , sex , family status , disability , etc. ) .
One of those things is asking you about social organizations you belong to ( presumably because someone could derrive illegal information from this like your age , nationality , religion , etc. ) .
Asking for your Facebook/Myspace/etc .
information would almost CERTAINLY fall under this ( since things like age/sex/etc .
are standard categories on most social websites , and this information is supposed to be basically anonymous ) and is really opening them up for a rather impolite visit from the EEOC [ eeoc.gov ] .
I suspect that , in these hard times , it 's just that no one has bothered to file a claim against them yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a LOT of stuff that prospective employers can't ask you [hrworld.com] (race, sex, family status, disability, etc.).
One of those things is asking you about social organizations you belong to (presumably because someone could derrive illegal information from this like your age, nationality, religion, etc.).
Asking for your Facebook/Myspace/etc.
information would almost CERTAINLY fall under this (since things like age/sex/etc.
are standard categories on most social websites, and this information is supposed to be basically anonymous) and is really opening them up for a rather impolite visit from the EEOC [eeoc.gov].
I suspect that, in these hard times, it's just that no one has bothered to file a claim against them yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389409</id>
	<title>Re:My Klingon Keyboard</title>
	<author>Chelloveck</author>
	<datestamp>1245424080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/Klingon+Language-Details.htm" title="cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk">Not a problem.</a> [cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk] Now, your passwords, please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a problem .
[ cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk ] Now , your passwords , please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Not a problem.
[cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk] Now, your passwords, please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385847</id>
	<title>Re:You know what to do</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1245351360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should have included his password, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should have included his password , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should have included his password, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380107</id>
	<title>anonymous coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I printed out the application, policy and survey forms on the Bozeman City site.  I saw NO requirement or reference to any such thing.  The application form was dated April 2009</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I printed out the application , policy and survey forms on the Bozeman City site .
I saw NO requirement or reference to any such thing .
The application form was dated April 2009</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I printed out the application, policy and survey forms on the Bozeman City site.
I saw NO requirement or reference to any such thing.
The application form was dated April 2009</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389739</id>
	<title>No Problemo . . .</title>
	<author>Slugster</author>
	<datestamp>1245425400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Put down 4chan.org, and tell them your username is "anonymous".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)
<br>~</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put down 4chan.org , and tell them your username is " anonymous " .
; ) ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put down 4chan.org, and tell them your username is "anonymous".
;)
~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28387027</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245407340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know, I was totally going to suggest that somebody (already heterosexually married with kids of course) file with sites like:<br>site: gayshoppe.com  password:i\_like\_4n4l<br>site: men.com  password: menrgre4t!!!<br>site: wikileaks.org  password:12345abcde</p><p>And then sit back and wait for the lawsuit money to come rolling in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , I was totally going to suggest that somebody ( already heterosexually married with kids of course ) file with sites like : site : gayshoppe.com password : i \ _like \ _4n4lsite : men.com password : menrgre4t ! !
! site : wikileaks.org password : 12345abcdeAnd then sit back and wait for the lawsuit money to come rolling in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, I was totally going to suggest that somebody (already heterosexually married with kids of course) file with sites like:site: gayshoppe.com  password:i\_like\_4n4lsite: men.com  password: menrgre4t!!
!site: wikileaks.org  password:12345abcdeAnd then sit back and wait for the lawsuit money to come rolling in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386835</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245405120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I beleive the missing word you were looking for is 'deterrent'. You are correct in that police cannot always *prevent* someone from committing a criminal act which would injure you or damage your property. However, if the police force is on its toes and is very good at finding and apprehending those that commit such acts, then there might be some percentage of those that might have a tendency to commit such a crime might decide not to, out of fear of getting caught.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I beleive the missing word you were looking for is 'deterrent' .
You are correct in that police can not always * prevent * someone from committing a criminal act which would injure you or damage your property .
However , if the police force is on its toes and is very good at finding and apprehending those that commit such acts , then there might be some percentage of those that might have a tendency to commit such a crime might decide not to , out of fear of getting caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I beleive the missing word you were looking for is 'deterrent'.
You are correct in that police cannot always *prevent* someone from committing a criminal act which would injure you or damage your property.
However, if the police force is on its toes and is very good at finding and apprehending those that commit such acts, then there might be some percentage of those that might have a tendency to commit such a crime might decide not to, out of fear of getting caught.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378569</id>
	<title>There can be only one...</title>
	<author>Yert</author>
	<datestamp>1245356100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>appropriate response, that is.</p><p>Go to hell.</p><p>After enough well-qualified applicants refuse, they'll reconsider the requirement - probably after half the existing workforce quits because they're overworked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>appropriate response , that is.Go to hell.After enough well-qualified applicants refuse , they 'll reconsider the requirement - probably after half the existing workforce quits because they 're overworked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>appropriate response, that is.Go to hell.After enough well-qualified applicants refuse, they'll reconsider the requirement - probably after half the existing workforce quits because they're overworked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote?</p><p>The police force protects your property by their existence. Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote ? The police force protects your property by their existence .
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences , and this deters crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote?The police force protects your property by their existence.
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396707</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1245410400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One would hope it would be a violation of their internal security policy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One would hope it would be a violation of their internal security policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One would hope it would be a violation of their internal security policy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380113</id>
	<title>It can be made to bite itself...</title>
	<author>uffe\_nordholm</author>
	<datestamp>1245317520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't understand why they would ask for this kind of information. And the fact that they ask is enough to tell me I porbably don't want to work for them (even assuming I lived in the area).
<br> <br>
However, it can be put to possibly good use. Apply for any number of jobs with them, and provide a suitable number of account details, including everything they need to log in. Just slip in some pre-arranged details, so htey can log on to a web page displaying eg child porn. If the server is outside the USA the local, regional and federal authorities have very little power to do anything about it, until the next step: when your accomplice, who just happens to be the one running the server, lets you know that 'your' login credentials have been used, call the cops and let them know an employee of Bozeman is looking at child porn at his work computer.
<br> <br>
When this has happened a few times, I hope the politicians (or other high-up) will remove this preposterous demand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't understand why they would ask for this kind of information .
And the fact that they ask is enough to tell me I porbably do n't want to work for them ( even assuming I lived in the area ) .
However , it can be put to possibly good use .
Apply for any number of jobs with them , and provide a suitable number of account details , including everything they need to log in .
Just slip in some pre-arranged details , so htey can log on to a web page displaying eg child porn .
If the server is outside the USA the local , regional and federal authorities have very little power to do anything about it , until the next step : when your accomplice , who just happens to be the one running the server , lets you know that 'your ' login credentials have been used , call the cops and let them know an employee of Bozeman is looking at child porn at his work computer .
When this has happened a few times , I hope the politicians ( or other high-up ) will remove this preposterous demand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't understand why they would ask for this kind of information.
And the fact that they ask is enough to tell me I porbably don't want to work for them (even assuming I lived in the area).
However, it can be put to possibly good use.
Apply for any number of jobs with them, and provide a suitable number of account details, including everything they need to log in.
Just slip in some pre-arranged details, so htey can log on to a web page displaying eg child porn.
If the server is outside the USA the local, regional and federal authorities have very little power to do anything about it, until the next step: when your accomplice, who just happens to be the one running the server, lets you know that 'your' login credentials have been used, call the cops and let them know an employee of Bozeman is looking at child porn at his work computer.
When this has happened a few times, I hope the politicians (or other high-up) will remove this preposterous demand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384399</id>
	<title>Looks like there's a follow-up story</title>
	<author>LionMage</author>
	<datestamp>1245337380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a follow-up story <a href="http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10558291" title="montanasnewsstation.com">here</a> [montanasnewsstation.com] which mentions, among other things, that this practice is a TOS violation for many web sites.  However, nobody seems clued in yet that there may be other legal issues, like violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a follow-up story here [ montanasnewsstation.com ] which mentions , among other things , that this practice is a TOS violation for many web sites .
However , nobody seems clued in yet that there may be other legal issues , like violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a follow-up story here [montanasnewsstation.com] which mentions, among other things, that this practice is a TOS violation for many web sites.
However, nobody seems clued in yet that there may be other legal issues, like violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381813</id>
	<title>OT: obscure reference</title>
	<author>Xtifr</author>
	<datestamp>1245324540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the hovercraft license scene from "The Butterfly Kid".</p></div><p>Holy smokes, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Butterfly\_Kid" title="wikipedia.org">there's an obscure reference</a> [wikipedia.org]!  Especially these days.  The second book in the series was written by Michael Kurland, who was married to my aunt at one time, but the third book was written by T.A. Waters who has the same last name as me, but was absolutely no relation. Boy we managed to confuse some people with that!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the hovercraft license scene from " The Butterfly Kid " .Holy smokes , there 's an obscure reference [ wikipedia.org ] !
Especially these days .
The second book in the series was written by Michael Kurland , who was married to my aunt at one time , but the third book was written by T.A .
Waters who has the same last name as me , but was absolutely no relation .
Boy we managed to confuse some people with that !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the hovercraft license scene from "The Butterfly Kid".Holy smokes, there's an obscure reference [wikipedia.org]!
Especially these days.
The second book in the series was written by Michael Kurland, who was married to my aunt at one time, but the third book was written by T.A.
Waters who has the same last name as me, but was absolutely no relation.
Boy we managed to confuse some people with that!
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380367</id>
	<title>What about mail/emails?</title>
	<author>WraithKenny</author>
	<datestamp>1245318420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People sometimes use these services in much the same way as email or snail mail; for personal communications. Do they ask for email passwords? How about any and all correspondence sent or received through the post office?</htmltext>
<tokenext>People sometimes use these services in much the same way as email or snail mail ; for personal communications .
Do they ask for email passwords ?
How about any and all correspondence sent or received through the post office ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People sometimes use these services in much the same way as email or snail mail; for personal communications.
Do they ask for email passwords?
How about any and all correspondence sent or received through the post office?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377441</id>
	<title>At least they are polite</title>
	<author>Danathar</author>
	<datestamp>1245353220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They DID say "Please"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They DID say " Please " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They DID say "Please"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379531</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>TDyl</author>
	<datestamp>1245315720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Raisin' it up
Waxen it down
Tying it to the whipping post
In the middle of town
But by myself i wouldn't
Have no boss,
Cause i'd be raisin' my lonely
Whipping post</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raisin ' it up Waxen it down Tying it to the whipping post In the middle of town But by myself i would n't Have no boss , Cause i 'd be raisin ' my lonely Whipping post</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raisin' it up
Waxen it down
Tying it to the whipping post
In the middle of town
But by myself i wouldn't
Have no boss,
Cause i'd be raisin' my lonely
Whipping post</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392315</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Biswalt</author>
	<datestamp>1245436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can actually imagine privately funded roaded because I've been on private roads before (very common out in the country) and also toll road highways are almost always built and designed by private companies now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can actually imagine privately funded roaded because I 've been on private roads before ( very common out in the country ) and also toll road highways are almost always built and designed by private companies now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can actually imagine privately funded roaded because I've been on private roads before (very common out in the country) and also toll road highways are almost always built and designed by private companies now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378153</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>AndersOSU</author>
	<datestamp>1245355020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In spite of what HR related websites want you to believe it's not illegal to ask any of those questions.  What it is, is a Real Bad Idea (TM).  It's illegal to <b>discriminate</b> on the basis of a protected class, but it isn't illegal to ask <i>per se</i>.  If you're foolish enough to ask one of those questions, it does leave you wide open to a law suit - but that suit is going to allege you discriminated based on that information, and they're most likely going to need some demographic information from your company to support their charges if you don't roll over and settle right away.</p><p>An example, a candidate named Hans Richtenfliegen interviews with Wienerhoffman schnitzel factory.  The interviewer foolishly asks Hans, who happens to be German, if he still has any relatives back in the old country.  Hans, after being turned down for the job, files a complaint with his local labor board alleging he was turned down based on his national origin.  After some preliminary investigations, it turns out that 50\% of upper management is of Germanic dissent, and the candidate who got the job, Jorg Waldenschwimmen, was also of German dissent.  What's more, the overall demographics of the company closely conform to the demographics of the surrounding area.  Hans is going to have a hard time making his case that something illegal took place based on that question.  In other words, there's no such thing as an illegal question.  But it's still a bad idea to tempt fate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In spite of what HR related websites want you to believe it 's not illegal to ask any of those questions .
What it is , is a Real Bad Idea ( TM ) .
It 's illegal to discriminate on the basis of a protected class , but it is n't illegal to ask per se .
If you 're foolish enough to ask one of those questions , it does leave you wide open to a law suit - but that suit is going to allege you discriminated based on that information , and they 're most likely going to need some demographic information from your company to support their charges if you do n't roll over and settle right away.An example , a candidate named Hans Richtenfliegen interviews with Wienerhoffman schnitzel factory .
The interviewer foolishly asks Hans , who happens to be German , if he still has any relatives back in the old country .
Hans , after being turned down for the job , files a complaint with his local labor board alleging he was turned down based on his national origin .
After some preliminary investigations , it turns out that 50 \ % of upper management is of Germanic dissent , and the candidate who got the job , Jorg Waldenschwimmen , was also of German dissent .
What 's more , the overall demographics of the company closely conform to the demographics of the surrounding area .
Hans is going to have a hard time making his case that something illegal took place based on that question .
In other words , there 's no such thing as an illegal question .
But it 's still a bad idea to tempt fate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In spite of what HR related websites want you to believe it's not illegal to ask any of those questions.
What it is, is a Real Bad Idea (TM).
It's illegal to discriminate on the basis of a protected class, but it isn't illegal to ask per se.
If you're foolish enough to ask one of those questions, it does leave you wide open to a law suit - but that suit is going to allege you discriminated based on that information, and they're most likely going to need some demographic information from your company to support their charges if you don't roll over and settle right away.An example, a candidate named Hans Richtenfliegen interviews with Wienerhoffman schnitzel factory.
The interviewer foolishly asks Hans, who happens to be German, if he still has any relatives back in the old country.
Hans, after being turned down for the job, files a complaint with his local labor board alleging he was turned down based on his national origin.
After some preliminary investigations, it turns out that 50\% of upper management is of Germanic dissent, and the candidate who got the job, Jorg Waldenschwimmen, was also of German dissent.
What's more, the overall demographics of the company closely conform to the demographics of the surrounding area.
Hans is going to have a hard time making his case that something illegal took place based on that question.
In other words, there's no such thing as an illegal question.
But it's still a bad idea to tempt fate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</id>
	<title>WTF</title>
	<author>Jaysyn</author>
	<datestamp>1245352740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are seriously asking for people's passwords?  If this some kinda of social engineering test where if you actually put them down you fail?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are seriously asking for people 's passwords ?
If this some kinda of social engineering test where if you actually put them down you fail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are seriously asking for people's passwords?
If this some kinda of social engineering test where if you actually put them down you fail?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379049</id>
	<title>Theoretically...</title>
	<author>Kazoo the Clown</author>
	<datestamp>1245357540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could use some kind of password management system that changes all your passwords automatically every hour or so.  The honest answer would then be that you just don't know your passwords as your computer manages them for you, and even if you did know they would be obsolete in an hour.<br> <br>

Of course your banking site might think something is up and disable your account if you're constantly changing your password like that...<br> <br>

I realize that it's pretty stupid that they would even ask such a thing, but it's also pretty stupid that they are assuming that everyone uses the internet in such a way that the request isn't simply a non-sequitur.   And it's not like there aren't plenty of people out there who still aren't even on the internet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could use some kind of password management system that changes all your passwords automatically every hour or so .
The honest answer would then be that you just do n't know your passwords as your computer manages them for you , and even if you did know they would be obsolete in an hour .
Of course your banking site might think something is up and disable your account if you 're constantly changing your password like that.. . I realize that it 's pretty stupid that they would even ask such a thing , but it 's also pretty stupid that they are assuming that everyone uses the internet in such a way that the request is n't simply a non-sequitur .
And it 's not like there are n't plenty of people out there who still are n't even on the internet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could use some kind of password management system that changes all your passwords automatically every hour or so.
The honest answer would then be that you just don't know your passwords as your computer manages them for you, and even if you did know they would be obsolete in an hour.
Of course your banking site might think something is up and disable your account if you're constantly changing your password like that... 

I realize that it's pretty stupid that they would even ask such a thing, but it's also pretty stupid that they are assuming that everyone uses the internet in such a way that the request isn't simply a non-sequitur.
And it's not like there aren't plenty of people out there who still aren't even on the internet...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465</id>
	<title>Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1245353280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of those sites (if not all of them) probably state in the TOS that you are not to share your login information.  So... they're asking people to violate their agreements, and won't hire people who refuse.  For example, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf" title="facebook.com">Facebook's Terms</a> [facebook.com] section 4 item 6 states "You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account."</p><p>Brilliant.  If you want to bribe a city official, go to Bozeman, because they only hire people who violate policy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of those sites ( if not all of them ) probably state in the TOS that you are not to share your login information .
So... they 're asking people to violate their agreements , and wo n't hire people who refuse .
For example , Facebook 's Terms [ facebook.com ] section 4 item 6 states " You will not share your password , let anyone else access your account , or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account. " Brilliant .
If you want to bribe a city official , go to Bozeman , because they only hire people who violate policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of those sites (if not all of them) probably state in the TOS that you are not to share your login information.
So... they're asking people to violate their agreements, and won't hire people who refuse.
For example, Facebook's Terms [facebook.com] section 4 item 6 states "You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account."Brilliant.
If you want to bribe a city official, go to Bozeman, because they only hire people who violate policy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378405</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245355680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe that's the point.   You can always fire them for falsification on the application later on if the person doesn't work out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that 's the point .
You can always fire them for falsification on the application later on if the person does n't work out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that's the point.
You can always fire them for falsification on the application later on if the person doesn't work out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379555</id>
	<title>Read the background check form...</title>
	<author>inject\_hotmail.com</author>
	<datestamp>1245315780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I read the application form...I couldn't believe my eyes...well, actually, I believed my eyes, but, let's get back to my point.  It's quite unreal what the city demands.  Here's an excerpt:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I release the City of Bozeman, Montana and/or its agents and any person or entity, which provides information pursuant to this authorization, from any and all liabilities, claims or law suits in regards to the information obtained from any and all of the above referenced sources used.</p></div><p>So...applicants have to hand over their personal life on a platter, unfettered access, to some unknown HUMAN, whom has the ability to actually be imperfect, and the city has absolutely no liability.  So, this means that if anyone were to trash an applicant's life, the city couldn't be held responsible.  Yeah, ok.  That's completely fair.  Oh, and how secure are these files?  Are the kept in paper format only?  In a filing cabinet, is it locked?  Is the room locked?  How easily could someone else view this information.  And no, just because the door is locked at night when no one else is around isn't good enough.  I'd expect Pentagon-like security...does anyone really think this would be the case?  Nonsense at its finest.</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all information which you, as a previous employer or employment reference, may have concerning me, including information of a confidential or privileged nature. I hereby release any organization, company, institution or person for which I have been employed furnishing the information requested.</p></div><p>Again with the carte blanche.  What if some of this information included attorney-client?</p><p>This all is just a matter of the city big-wigs feeling entitled to their entitlement...and that entitlement is your privacy, which belongs to YOU and no one else.  Don't give it to them.  If everyone that applied didn't give them the info they requested, then they'd have to accept it.  If they need someone to perform a job, they have to hire someone...and if no one submits to their ridiculous attempts at skirting around privacy laws, they will be put back in their place.</p><p>Some guy once said "United we stand, divided we fall".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I read the application form...I could n't believe my eyes...well , actually , I believed my eyes , but , let 's get back to my point .
It 's quite unreal what the city demands .
Here 's an excerpt : I release the City of Bozeman , Montana and/or its agents and any person or entity , which provides information pursuant to this authorization , from any and all liabilities , claims or law suits in regards to the information obtained from any and all of the above referenced sources used.So...applicants have to hand over their personal life on a platter , unfettered access , to some unknown HUMAN , whom has the ability to actually be imperfect , and the city has absolutely no liability .
So , this means that if anyone were to trash an applicant 's life , the city could n't be held responsible .
Yeah , ok. That 's completely fair .
Oh , and how secure are these files ?
Are the kept in paper format only ?
In a filing cabinet , is it locked ?
Is the room locked ?
How easily could someone else view this information .
And no , just because the door is locked at night when no one else is around is n't good enough .
I 'd expect Pentagon-like security...does anyone really think this would be the case ?
Nonsense at its finest .
  I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all information which you , as a previous employer or employment reference , may have concerning me , including information of a confidential or privileged nature .
I hereby release any organization , company , institution or person for which I have been employed furnishing the information requested.Again with the carte blanche .
What if some of this information included attorney-client ? This all is just a matter of the city big-wigs feeling entitled to their entitlement...and that entitlement is your privacy , which belongs to YOU and no one else .
Do n't give it to them .
If everyone that applied did n't give them the info they requested , then they 'd have to accept it .
If they need someone to perform a job , they have to hire someone...and if no one submits to their ridiculous attempts at skirting around privacy laws , they will be put back in their place.Some guy once said " United we stand , divided we fall " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I read the application form...I couldn't believe my eyes...well, actually, I believed my eyes, but, let's get back to my point.
It's quite unreal what the city demands.
Here's an excerpt:I release the City of Bozeman, Montana and/or its agents and any person or entity, which provides information pursuant to this authorization, from any and all liabilities, claims or law suits in regards to the information obtained from any and all of the above referenced sources used.So...applicants have to hand over their personal life on a platter, unfettered access, to some unknown HUMAN, whom has the ability to actually be imperfect, and the city has absolutely no liability.
So, this means that if anyone were to trash an applicant's life, the city couldn't be held responsible.
Yeah, ok.  That's completely fair.
Oh, and how secure are these files?
Are the kept in paper format only?
In a filing cabinet, is it locked?
Is the room locked?
How easily could someone else view this information.
And no, just because the door is locked at night when no one else is around isn't good enough.
I'd expect Pentagon-like security...does anyone really think this would be the case?
Nonsense at its finest.
  I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all information which you, as a previous employer or employment reference, may have concerning me, including information of a confidential or privileged nature.
I hereby release any organization, company, institution or person for which I have been employed furnishing the information requested.Again with the carte blanche.
What if some of this information included attorney-client?This all is just a matter of the city big-wigs feeling entitled to their entitlement...and that entitlement is your privacy, which belongs to YOU and no one else.
Don't give it to them.
If everyone that applied didn't give them the info they requested, then they'd have to accept it.
If they need someone to perform a job, they have to hire someone...and if no one submits to their ridiculous attempts at skirting around privacy laws, they will be put back in their place.Some guy once said "United we stand, divided we fall".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377787</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a simple "go Fuck yourself" will suffice!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a simple " go Fuck yourself " will suffice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a simple "go Fuck yourself" will suffice!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381449</id>
	<title>Don't touch my door knob! Get off my lawn!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245322860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And pay your own hospital bills incurred in your struggle against violent defences.  Who modded that up, without any grant of charter in their hand?</p><blockquote><div><p>Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote?</p><p><b>The police force protects your property by their existence. Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.</b></p></div> </blockquote><p>Is this a joke?  Why is it that <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=\%22police+have+no+liability\%22&amp;btnG=Google+Search" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Police have no liability</a> [google.com] to perform the functions even if subscribed proper for their services?  Do I have to spell it out for you in case-law?  Your mind is baked as much as mine is, the difference is that I still have my sense of smell that wakes me from that stupor:</p><blockquote><div><p>Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1982) (no federal constitutional requirement that police provide protection)</p><p>Calogrides v. Mobile, 475 So. 2d 560 (Ala. 1985); Cal Govt. Code 845 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Calogrides v. Mobile, 846 (no liability for failure to arrest or to retain arrested person in custody)</p><p>Davidson v. Westminster, 32 Cal.3d 197, 185, Cal. Rep. 252; 649 P.2d 894 (1982) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Stone v. State 106 Cal.App.3d 924, 165 Cal Rep. 339 (1980) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306 (D.C.App. 1983) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C.App 1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So.2d 363 (Fla. App. 1st Dist.), cert. denied 354 So.2d 985 (Fla. 1977); Ill. Rec. Stat. 4-102 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Keane v. Chicago, 98 Ill. App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1st Dist. 1968) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Jamison v. Chicago, 48 Ill. App. 3d 567 (1st Dist. 1977) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Simpson's Food Fair v. Evansville, 272 N.E.2d 871 (Ind. App.) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Silver v. Minneapolis, 170 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 1969) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Wuetrich V. Delia, 155 N.J. Super. 324, 326, 382, A.2d 929, 930 cert. denied 77 N.J. 486, 391 A.2d 500 (1978) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Chapman v. Philadelphia, 290 Pa. Super. 281, 434 A.2d 753 (Penn. 1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p><p>Morris v. Musser, 84 Pa. Cmwth. 170, 478 A.2d 937 (1984) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)</p></div></blockquote><p>Do I behave you creatures daily by posting the same over-used over-analysed court cases to prove you are a conquered effeminate slave and generaly bad neighbor?  Your inability to weild a gun proves that your house is a gateway for criminals to enter and spill into my front lawn when they're done assaulting your disarmed a$$.  Can you name one U.S. city with the strictest gun laws and the lowest gun-related crime effected by a fear of such "police" without sacrificing their market and fleecing lawful trade and market by taxation?</p><blockquote><div><p>"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." --Col. Jeff Cooper</p><p>False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crime. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson " -- Thomas Jefferson</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And pay your own hospital bills incurred in your struggle against violent defences .
Who modded that up , without any grant of charter in their hand ? Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote ? The police force protects your property by their existence .
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences , and this deters crime .
Is this a joke ?
Why is it that Police have no liability [ google.com ] to perform the functions even if subscribed proper for their services ?
Do I have to spell it out for you in case-law ?
Your mind is baked as much as mine is , the difference is that I still have my sense of smell that wakes me from that stupor : Bowers v. DeVito , 686 F.2d 616 ( 7th Cir .
1982 ) ( no federal constitutional requirement that police provide protection ) Calogrides v. Mobile , 475 So .
2d 560 ( Ala. 1985 ) ; Cal Govt .
Code 845 ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Calogrides v. Mobile , 846 ( no liability for failure to arrest or to retain arrested person in custody ) Davidson v. Westminster , 32 Cal.3d 197 , 185 , Cal .
Rep. 252 ; 649 P.2d 894 ( 1982 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Stone v. State 106 Cal.App.3d 924 , 165 Cal Rep. 339 ( 1980 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Morgan v. District of Columbia , 468 A.2d 1306 ( D.C.App .
1983 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Warren v. District of Columbia , 444 A.2d 1 ( D.C.App 1981 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Sapp v. Tallahassee , 348 So.2d 363 ( Fla. App. 1st Dist .
) , cert .
denied 354 So.2d 985 ( Fla. 1977 ) ; Ill. Rec. Stat .
4-102 ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Keane v. Chicago , 98 Ill. App.2d 460 , 240 N.E.2d 321 ( 1st Dist .
1968 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Jamison v. Chicago , 48 Ill. App. 3d 567 ( 1st Dist .
1977 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Simpson 's Food Fair v. Evansville , 272 N.E.2d 871 ( Ind .
App. ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Silver v. Minneapolis , 170 N.W.2d 206 ( Minn. 1969 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Wuetrich V. Delia , 155 N.J. Super. 324 , 326 , 382 , A.2d 929 , 930 cert .
denied 77 N.J. 486 , 391 A.2d 500 ( 1978 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Chapman v. Philadelphia , 290 Pa. Super. 281 , 434 A.2d 753 ( Penn .
1981 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Morris v. Musser , 84 Pa. Cmwth. 170 , 478 A.2d 937 ( 1984 ) ( no liability for failure to provide police protection ) Do I behave you creatures daily by posting the same over-used over-analysed court cases to prove you are a conquered effeminate slave and generaly bad neighbor ?
Your inability to weild a gun proves that your house is a gateway for criminals to enter and spill into my front lawn when they 're done assaulting your disarmed a $ $ .
Can you name one U.S. city with the strictest gun laws and the lowest gun-related crime effected by a fear of such " police " without sacrificing their market and fleecing lawful trade and market by taxation ?
" An unarmed man can only flee from evil , and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it .
" --Col. Jeff CooperFalse is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience ; that would take fire from men because it burns , and water because one may drown in it ; that has no remedy for evils except destruction .
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature .
They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crime .
Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants ; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides , for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man .
" -Thomas Jefferson " -- Thomas Jefferson</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And pay your own hospital bills incurred in your struggle against violent defences.
Who modded that up, without any grant of charter in their hand?Do you have any data to back up your fire department efficiency anecdote?The police force protects your property by their existence.
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.
Is this a joke?
Why is it that Police have no liability [google.com] to perform the functions even if subscribed proper for their services?
Do I have to spell it out for you in case-law?
Your mind is baked as much as mine is, the difference is that I still have my sense of smell that wakes me from that stupor:Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir.
1982) (no federal constitutional requirement that police provide protection)Calogrides v. Mobile, 475 So.
2d 560 (Ala. 1985); Cal Govt.
Code 845 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Calogrides v. Mobile, 846 (no liability for failure to arrest or to retain arrested person in custody)Davidson v. Westminster, 32 Cal.3d 197, 185, Cal.
Rep. 252; 649 P.2d 894 (1982) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Stone v. State 106 Cal.App.3d 924, 165 Cal Rep. 339 (1980) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306 (D.C.App.
1983) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C.App 1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So.2d 363 (Fla. App. 1st Dist.
), cert.
denied 354 So.2d 985 (Fla. 1977); Ill. Rec. Stat.
4-102 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Keane v. Chicago, 98 Ill. App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1st Dist.
1968) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Jamison v. Chicago, 48 Ill. App. 3d 567 (1st Dist.
1977) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Simpson's Food Fair v. Evansville, 272 N.E.2d 871 (Ind.
App.) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Silver v. Minneapolis, 170 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 1969) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Wuetrich V. Delia, 155 N.J. Super. 324, 326, 382, A.2d 929, 930 cert.
denied 77 N.J. 486, 391 A.2d 500 (1978) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Chapman v. Philadelphia, 290 Pa. Super. 281, 434 A.2d 753 (Penn.
1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Morris v. Musser, 84 Pa. Cmwth. 170, 478 A.2d 937 (1984) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Do I behave you creatures daily by posting the same over-used over-analysed court cases to prove you are a conquered effeminate slave and generaly bad neighbor?
Your inability to weild a gun proves that your house is a gateway for criminals to enter and spill into my front lawn when they're done assaulting your disarmed a$$.
Can you name one U.S. city with the strictest gun laws and the lowest gun-related crime effected by a fear of such "police" without sacrificing their market and fleecing lawful trade and market by taxation?
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.
" --Col. Jeff CooperFalse is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction.
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature.
They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crime.
Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
" -Thomas Jefferson " -- Thomas Jefferson
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379283</id>
	<title>City in Montana?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245358200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>City in Montana.  Certainly an oxymoron, right?</p><p>28,000 souls makes a city?  I'd have thought it would take at least 50k.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>City in Montana .
Certainly an oxymoron , right ? 28,000 souls makes a city ?
I 'd have thought it would take at least 50k .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>City in Montana.
Certainly an oxymoron, right?28,000 souls makes a city?
I'd have thought it would take at least 50k.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1245354180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization. Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department. <br>
The police force does not protect you or your property, they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property. That doesn't do you any good. The damage is already done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization .
Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department .
The police force does not protect you or your property , they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property .
That does n't do you any good .
The damage is already done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I live the fire department is a private volunteer organization.
Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department.
The police force does not protect you or your property, they apprehend and hold for trial those who stole/damaged your property.
That doesn't do you any good.
The damage is already done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378719</id>
	<title>Re:no freaking way</title>
	<author>JoeMerchant</author>
	<datestamp>1245356520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is completely without merit and rather insane.  I would walkout right then and there.  As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life.</p></div><p>You're in the biggest city in nowhere Montana and you're applying for a civil service job, odds are that the Denny's just hired up last week and the only other job available right now is scooping Buffalo pies on some ranch outside of town.  Winter's coming... what have you got to hide, anyway, son?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is completely without merit and rather insane .
I would walkout right then and there .
As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life.You 're in the biggest city in nowhere Montana and you 're applying for a civil service job , odds are that the Denny 's just hired up last week and the only other job available right now is scooping Buffalo pies on some ranch outside of town .
Winter 's coming... what have you got to hide , anyway , son ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is completely without merit and rather insane.
I would walkout right then and there.
As long as I show up and perform my duties as required my employer has right or even need to look into my personal life.You're in the biggest city in nowhere Montana and you're applying for a civil service job, odds are that the Denny's just hired up last week and the only other job available right now is scooping Buffalo pies on some ranch outside of town.
Winter's coming... what have you got to hide, anyway, son?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379405</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1245358500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know why you're modded Troll; I found your post rather insightful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why you 're modded Troll ; I found your post rather insightful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why you're modded Troll; I found your post rather insightful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383775</id>
	<title>Office of the City Attorney, Bozeman, MT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245333360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sirs,</p><p>Just testing Mark Seymour Blake's Slashdot user account to see if there has been any anti-social activity. Mr. Blake has just applied for the position of Signage Evaluation Engineer at $18,700 annually. We have seen many applications from left wing fanatics and Obama supporters for this position.</p><p>What is Slashdot anyway?</p><p>When the given user info was not accepted for Mr. Blake, the system called me an Anonymous Coward. Trying to rectify the situation by providing as much information as possible.</p><p>Kind Regards,</p><p>Attorney Greg Sullivan<br>City of Bozeman, MT</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sirs,Just testing Mark Seymour Blake 's Slashdot user account to see if there has been any anti-social activity .
Mr. Blake has just applied for the position of Signage Evaluation Engineer at $ 18,700 annually .
We have seen many applications from left wing fanatics and Obama supporters for this position.What is Slashdot anyway ? When the given user info was not accepted for Mr. Blake , the system called me an Anonymous Coward .
Trying to rectify the situation by providing as much information as possible.Kind Regards,Attorney Greg SullivanCity of Bozeman , MT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sirs,Just testing Mark Seymour Blake's Slashdot user account to see if there has been any anti-social activity.
Mr. Blake has just applied for the position of Signage Evaluation Engineer at $18,700 annually.
We have seen many applications from left wing fanatics and Obama supporters for this position.What is Slashdot anyway?When the given user info was not accepted for Mr. Blake, the system called me an Anonymous Coward.
Trying to rectify the situation by providing as much information as possible.Kind Regards,Attorney Greg SullivanCity of Bozeman, MT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386495</id>
	<title>Re:Only 3 lines?</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1245443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And don't forget the accounts with 1-click ordering, like say Amazon or iTunes.  Free stuffz 4 them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And do n't forget the accounts with 1-click ordering , like say Amazon or iTunes .
Free stuffz 4 them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And don't forget the accounts with 1-click ordering, like say Amazon or iTunes.
Free stuffz 4 them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377727</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>mitch\_feaster</author>
	<datestamp>1245354000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This could be just the thing for me to break into the pen business -- MD5 hash capabilities on a ballpoint!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be just the thing for me to break into the pen business -- MD5 hash capabilities on a ballpoint !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be just the thing for me to break into the pen business -- MD5 hash capabilities on a ballpoint!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378267</id>
	<title>The poll in TFA is funny</title>
	<author>bangthegong</author>
	<datestamp>1245355260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The poll in TFA is funny: 98\% against, 1\% for, and 1\% don't care.

I'm surprised the "don't care" isn't much higher given the level of apathy about ANY topic in this country, but who is the genius that instituted this policy, which is totally obvious to the most casual observer as being completely absurd?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The poll in TFA is funny : 98 \ % against , 1 \ % for , and 1 \ % do n't care .
I 'm surprised the " do n't care " is n't much higher given the level of apathy about ANY topic in this country , but who is the genius that instituted this policy , which is totally obvious to the most casual observer as being completely absurd ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The poll in TFA is funny: 98\% against, 1\% for, and 1\% don't care.
I'm surprised the "don't care" isn't much higher given the level of apathy about ANY topic in this country, but who is the genius that instituted this policy, which is totally obvious to the most casual observer as being completely absurd?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392141</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>jgostling</author>
	<datestamp>1245435780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really, who paid for their fire trucks?  I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change...</p></div><p>I do, as well as a host of other people. Donating on a monthly basis. Others do donate at lights. The older volunteers who are no longer physically apt to work in fires and rescue keep active by holding events to bring in more monthly donations.<br> <br>
Cheers!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , who paid for their fire trucks ?
I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change...I do , as well as a host of other people .
Donating on a monthly basis .
Others do donate at lights .
The older volunteers who are no longer physically apt to work in fires and rescue keep active by holding events to bring in more monthly donations .
Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, who paid for their fire trucks?
I seriously doubt it was done through standing at lights with a boot asking for spare change...I do, as well as a host of other people.
Donating on a monthly basis.
Others do donate at lights.
The older volunteers who are no longer physically apt to work in fires and rescue keep active by holding events to bring in more monthly donations.
Cheers!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289</id>
	<title>As offensive as this is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245352800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it deters people from applying for city jobs, it could prove to be a good thing.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it deters people from applying for city jobs , it could prove to be a good thing.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it deters people from applying for city jobs, it could prove to be a good thing.-jcr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385861</id>
	<title>Big hacking target</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1245351540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their HR department computers (or even all their computers as a means to get through to the HR department) have suddenly become the interest of thousands of hackers world wide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their HR department computers ( or even all their computers as a means to get through to the HR department ) have suddenly become the interest of thousands of hackers world wide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their HR department computers (or even all their computers as a means to get through to the HR department) have suddenly become the interest of thousands of hackers world wide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377631</id>
	<title>What is this Internet thing you speak of...</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1245353760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am sorry, I do not understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sorry , I do not understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sorry, I do not understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379325</id>
	<title>Contact them....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245358320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here are the contact info of the WHOLE City....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Mayor Kaaren Jacobson<br>587-5968<br>kjacobson@bozeman.net</p><p>Deputy Mayor/Commissioner Jeff Krauss<br>582-2341<br>jkrauss@bozeman.net</p><p>Commissioner Jeff Rupp<br>586-1380<br>jrupp@bozeman.net</p><p>Commissioner Sean Becker<br>581-7571<br>sbecker@bozeman.net</p><p>Commissioner Eric Bryson<br>582-2347<br>ebryson@bozeman.net</p><p>P.O. Box 1230<br>121 North Rouse<br>Bozeman, MT 59771<br>Fax: 582-2323</p><p>City Manager - Chris Kukulski<br>ckukulski@bozeman.net<br>(406)582-2306</p><p>Assistant City Manager - Chuck Winn<br>cwinn@bozeman.net<br>(406)582-2307</p><p>Assistant to City Manager - Brit Fontenot<br>bfontenot@bozeman.net<br>(406)582-2258</p><p>Executive Assistant - Karen Semerau<br>ksemerau@bozeman.net<br>(406)582-2306</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are the contact info of the WHOLE City.... ; ) Mayor Kaaren Jacobson587-5968kjacobson @ bozeman.netDeputy Mayor/Commissioner Jeff Krauss582-2341jkrauss @ bozeman.netCommissioner Jeff Rupp586-1380jrupp @ bozeman.netCommissioner Sean Becker581-7571sbecker @ bozeman.netCommissioner Eric Bryson582-2347ebryson @ bozeman.netP.O .
Box 1230121 North RouseBozeman , MT 59771Fax : 582-2323City Manager - Chris Kukulskickukulski @ bozeman.net ( 406 ) 582-2306Assistant City Manager - Chuck Winncwinn @ bozeman.net ( 406 ) 582-2307Assistant to City Manager - Brit Fontenotbfontenot @ bozeman.net ( 406 ) 582-2258Executive Assistant - Karen Semerauksemerau @ bozeman.net ( 406 ) 582-2306</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are the contact info of the WHOLE City.... ;)Mayor Kaaren Jacobson587-5968kjacobson@bozeman.netDeputy Mayor/Commissioner Jeff Krauss582-2341jkrauss@bozeman.netCommissioner Jeff Rupp586-1380jrupp@bozeman.netCommissioner Sean Becker581-7571sbecker@bozeman.netCommissioner Eric Bryson582-2347ebryson@bozeman.netP.O.
Box 1230121 North RouseBozeman, MT 59771Fax: 582-2323City Manager - Chris Kukulskickukulski@bozeman.net(406)582-2306Assistant City Manager - Chuck Winncwinn@bozeman.net(406)582-2307Assistant to City Manager - Brit Fontenotbfontenot@bozeman.net(406)582-2258Executive Assistant - Karen Semerauksemerau@bozeman.net(406)582-2306</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381699</id>
	<title>Phishing scam?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245324000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why else would Greg Sullivan,who  is a member of FaceBook and Linkedin, want your account login and passwords?</p><p>At the University I work at, we have to keep reminding people to *NOT* give out their username and password, because there is no valid reason for anyone but them to know it .</p><p>Of course, Mr. Sullivan has only been a lawyer for four years, so his lack of experience is showing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why else would Greg Sullivan,who is a member of FaceBook and Linkedin , want your account login and passwords ? At the University I work at , we have to keep reminding people to * NOT * give out their username and password , because there is no valid reason for anyone but them to know it .Of course , Mr. Sullivan has only been a lawyer for four years , so his lack of experience is showing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why else would Greg Sullivan,who  is a member of FaceBook and Linkedin, want your account login and passwords?At the University I work at, we have to keep reminding people to *NOT* give out their username and password, because there is no valid reason for anyone but them to know it .Of course, Mr. Sullivan has only been a lawyer for four years, so his lack of experience is showing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383387</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1245331260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here at work I once got roped into putting a big purchase through our totally screwed purchasing webapp. The finance person who passed the job to me asked for my password so he could go in to fix things and seemed surprised when I refused to give it to him. Apparently where he works that is just the normal way that people collaborate on things.<br> <br>
Of course in my team we all know enough root passwords to be able to su into any account we want. But most of us only use su for late night code reviews.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here at work I once got roped into putting a big purchase through our totally screwed purchasing webapp .
The finance person who passed the job to me asked for my password so he could go in to fix things and seemed surprised when I refused to give it to him .
Apparently where he works that is just the normal way that people collaborate on things .
Of course in my team we all know enough root passwords to be able to su into any account we want .
But most of us only use su for late night code reviews .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here at work I once got roped into putting a big purchase through our totally screwed purchasing webapp.
The finance person who passed the job to me asked for my password so he could go in to fix things and seemed surprised when I refused to give it to him.
Apparently where he works that is just the normal way that people collaborate on things.
Of course in my team we all know enough root passwords to be able to su into any account we want.
But most of us only use su for late night code reviews.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378897</id>
	<title>I live in Bozeman and I can confirm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245357000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We have idiots in local government. I live in the United States and I can confirm we have idiots in National government. But unlike Iran, at least our election process is somewhat transparent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have idiots in local government .
I live in the United States and I can confirm we have idiots in National government .
But unlike Iran , at least our election process is somewhat transparent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have idiots in local government.
I live in the United States and I can confirm we have idiots in National government.
But unlike Iran, at least our election process is somewhat transparent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378493</id>
	<title>...darn</title>
	<author>n30na</author>
	<datestamp>1245355920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...darn! They'll be able to access my super-secret porn server!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...darn !
They 'll be able to access my super-secret porn server !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...darn!
They'll be able to access my super-secret porn server!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>satcomjimmy</author>
	<datestamp>1245358380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd love to know if they respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for the passwords</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to know if they respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for the passwords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to know if they respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for the passwords</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391</id>
	<title>They really understand what they are asking for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services?<br>I'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.</p><p>What's next, asking for your login for your banking information, so they can see how you spend your personal money?</p><p>Personal background checks are fine (and valid for many jobs, maybe not for a rank-and-file city job, but meh).<br>But they need to be done properly and honestly.  This is just a really lazy and silly way to do it.<br>Obviously this policy and application wasn't vetted by anyone with a clue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services ? I 'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.What 's next , asking for your login for your banking information , so they can see how you spend your personal money ? Personal background checks are fine ( and valid for many jobs , maybe not for a rank-and-file city job , but meh ) .But they need to be done properly and honestly .
This is just a really lazy and silly way to do it.Obviously this policy and application was n't vetted by anyone with a clue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services?I'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.What's next, asking for your login for your banking information, so they can see how you spend your personal money?Personal background checks are fine (and valid for many jobs, maybe not for a rank-and-file city job, but meh).But they need to be done properly and honestly.
This is just a really lazy and silly way to do it.Obviously this policy and application wasn't vetted by anyone with a clue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382463</id>
	<title>Montana city hacked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245327540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having employed people with a disposition to hand out logins and passwords, a visitor requested the login and password from the employees and now has full control of the City computers.</p><p>When contacted to comment, the mayor provided his login and password and suggested we read 'c:\comment.doc'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having employed people with a disposition to hand out logins and passwords , a visitor requested the login and password from the employees and now has full control of the City computers.When contacted to comment , the mayor provided his login and password and suggested we read 'c : \ comment.doc' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having employed people with a disposition to hand out logins and passwords, a visitor requested the login and password from the employees and now has full control of the City computers.When contacted to comment, the mayor provided his login and password and suggested we read 'c:\comment.doc'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382487</id>
	<title>only 3 lines?!?!</title>
	<author>tagno25</author>
	<datestamp>1245327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>only three <b>lines</b>? <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=tagno25" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">My info</a> [google.com] takes 5+ pages just for the sites and user names (or one search URL) not including the passwords (some of them I do not know or want to [requires me to only use <b>MY</b> Linux laptop])</htmltext>
<tokenext>only three lines ?
My info [ google.com ] takes 5 + pages just for the sites and user names ( or one search URL ) not including the passwords ( some of them I do not know or want to [ requires me to only use MY Linux laptop ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>only three lines?
My info [google.com] takes 5+ pages just for the sites and user names (or one search URL) not including the passwords (some of them I do not know or want to [requires me to only use MY Linux laptop])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377985</id>
	<title>I found step 2!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, who's already incorporated and wants to make a few quick million with me?</p><p>Step 1: Create some social websites<br>Step 2: Require the person to check a box asserting they are the individual they are logging in as, and if they are not, explicitly require payment (along with assertion of authority to authorize said payment--I recommend requiring a valid bank account number on the second login screen).  A real user of course, can bypass this screen via private login url, or simply indicating that they really are bob.<br>Step 3:  file job application with username and passwords, and wait for the profit to roll in.  Alternately--if they checked the box, file charges for unauthorized access and be sure to subpoena *every* computer, router, and printer in city hall-the same as police would in a real investigation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , who 's already incorporated and wants to make a few quick million with me ? Step 1 : Create some social websitesStep 2 : Require the person to check a box asserting they are the individual they are logging in as , and if they are not , explicitly require payment ( along with assertion of authority to authorize said payment--I recommend requiring a valid bank account number on the second login screen ) .
A real user of course , can bypass this screen via private login url , or simply indicating that they really are bob.Step 3 : file job application with username and passwords , and wait for the profit to roll in .
Alternately--if they checked the box , file charges for unauthorized access and be sure to subpoena * every * computer , router , and printer in city hall-the same as police would in a real investigation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, who's already incorporated and wants to make a few quick million with me?Step 1: Create some social websitesStep 2: Require the person to check a box asserting they are the individual they are logging in as, and if they are not, explicitly require payment (along with assertion of authority to authorize said payment--I recommend requiring a valid bank account number on the second login screen).
A real user of course, can bypass this screen via private login url, or simply indicating that they really are bob.Step 3:  file job application with username and passwords, and wait for the profit to roll in.
Alternately--if they checked the box, file charges for unauthorized access and be sure to subpoena *every* computer, router, and printer in city hall-the same as police would in a real investigation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382165</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245325980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>that or you can sue <b>Montana City</b> for violating your privacy even with giving them the information, I'd suspect.</p></div><p>Nice to see you didn't even RTFS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>that or you can sue Montana City for violating your privacy even with giving them the information , I 'd suspect.Nice to see you did n't even RTFS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that or you can sue Montana City for violating your privacy even with giving them the information, I'd suspect.Nice to see you didn't even RTFS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377501</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377529</id>
	<title>In the Internet...</title>
	<author>juanergie</author>
	<datestamp>1245353460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... nobody knows you are a Montana worker.</p><p>Why are they concerned about who you've been poking? And what if they are members of, say, a porn site? Do they really expect them to write "I'm a member of turtlescopulating.com"? Nobody will know that Joe Smith is "longandwild87".</p><p>I say workers should just create a Gmail account called FuckYouBozemanLaw@gmail.com and start emailing their representatives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... nobody knows you are a Montana worker.Why are they concerned about who you 've been poking ?
And what if they are members of , say , a porn site ?
Do they really expect them to write " I 'm a member of turtlescopulating.com " ?
Nobody will know that Joe Smith is " longandwild87 " .I say workers should just create a Gmail account called FuckYouBozemanLaw @ gmail.com and start emailing their representatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... nobody knows you are a Montana worker.Why are they concerned about who you've been poking?
And what if they are members of, say, a porn site?
Do they really expect them to write "I'm a member of turtlescopulating.com"?
Nobody will know that Joe Smith is "longandwild87".I say workers should just create a Gmail account called FuckYouBozemanLaw@gmail.com and start emailing their representatives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384951</id>
	<title>How stupid.</title>
	<author>PhxBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1245341520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ (google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test!) I'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity' individuals.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Y'know, people don't have to be <b>smart</b> to have integrity.  And similarly, a lot of smart people have no scruples whatsoever.  One has nothing to do with the other.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ ( google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test !
) I 'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity ' individuals .
Y'know , people do n't have to be smart to have integrity .
And similarly , a lot of smart people have no scruples whatsoever .
One has nothing to do with the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ (google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test!
) I'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity' individuals.
Y'know, people don't have to be smart to have integrity.
And similarly, a lot of smart people have no scruples whatsoever.
One has nothing to do with the other.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386207</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>blankoboy</author>
	<datestamp>1245354960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FYI: Facebook is just as bad in my books as they encourage users to input their email account credentials to help them add friends to their facebook accounts. Very bad form IMO.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI : Facebook is just as bad in my books as they encourage users to input their email account credentials to help them add friends to their facebook accounts .
Very bad form IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI: Facebook is just as bad in my books as they encourage users to input their email account credentials to help them add friends to their facebook accounts.
Very bad form IMO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377355</id>
	<title>Invest in lead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's all I have to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all I have to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all I have to say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379279</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245358200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they weren't there to jail the guy who burglarized you neighbor's house yesterday, he might be breaking into yours tonight. Don't you believe that theives, rapists, and murderers belong in prison?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they were n't there to jail the guy who burglarized you neighbor 's house yesterday , he might be breaking into yours tonight .
Do n't you believe that theives , rapists , and murderers belong in prison ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they weren't there to jail the guy who burglarized you neighbor's house yesterday, he might be breaking into yours tonight.
Don't you believe that theives, rapists, and murderers belong in prison?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393277</id>
	<title>Re:My Klingon Keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245440340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a lot of my passwords are just muscle memory, unconsciously pressing the shift key etc.</p><p>Ask me to write them by hand, or switch me off a QWERTY keyboard and I just cant remember them. I've always joked, the best passwords are ones that you don't even know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a lot of my passwords are just muscle memory , unconsciously pressing the shift key etc.Ask me to write them by hand , or switch me off a QWERTY keyboard and I just cant remember them .
I 've always joked , the best passwords are ones that you do n't even know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a lot of my passwords are just muscle memory, unconsciously pressing the shift key etc.Ask me to write them by hand, or switch me off a QWERTY keyboard and I just cant remember them.
I've always joked, the best passwords are ones that you don't even know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380429</id>
	<title>Take the Fifth</title>
	<author>Dr\_Barnowl</author>
	<datestamp>1245318720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this against the Fifth Amendment? In that you can't be compelled to incriminate yourself?</p><p>Darn, it isn't. These people are not being compelled to testify at a legal proceeding. Or are they?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this against the Fifth Amendment ?
In that you ca n't be compelled to incriminate yourself ? Darn , it is n't .
These people are not being compelled to testify at a legal proceeding .
Or are they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this against the Fifth Amendment?
In that you can't be compelled to incriminate yourself?Darn, it isn't.
These people are not being compelled to testify at a legal proceeding.
Or are they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380921</id>
	<title>Re:Teach Your Children Well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245320640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but if you start developing their radar early, the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.</p></div><p>Yes, I want my kids to learn subterfuge for their teenage years</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but if you start developing their radar early , the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.Yes , I want my kids to learn subterfuge for their teenage years</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but if you start developing their radar early, the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.Yes, I want my kids to learn subterfuge for their teenage years
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379029</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245357480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Police are there to keep the peace, not protect yours or anyone else's property.  They are there to enforce the laws. They are the first level of enforcers for the government. As a matter of policy, the police do not care about you, your property, or your concerns. You call them to report a crime because someone has broken the government's law, not so they can come and protect you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Police are there to keep the peace , not protect yours or anyone else 's property .
They are there to enforce the laws .
They are the first level of enforcers for the government .
As a matter of policy , the police do not care about you , your property , or your concerns .
You call them to report a crime because someone has broken the government 's law , not so they can come and protect you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Police are there to keep the peace, not protect yours or anyone else's property.
They are there to enforce the laws.
They are the first level of enforcers for the government.
As a matter of policy, the police do not care about you, your property, or your concerns.
You call them to report a crime because someone has broken the government's law, not so they can come and protect you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396663</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>Burn\_This\_City</author>
	<datestamp>1245410160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>s/people's passwords/girls phone numbers/;

'two types' applies in all aspects of life<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>s/people 's passwords/girls phone numbers/ ; 'two types ' applies in all aspects of life : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>s/people's passwords/girls phone numbers/;

'two types' applies in all aspects of life :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378211</id>
	<title>City Attorney == Fail</title>
	<author>evil\_aar0n</author>
	<datestamp>1245355140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When this gets bounced out of court as un-Constitutional, I hope the city fires their attorney, Greg Sullivan.  It's one thing for a clueless HR person to come up with BS like this, but it's the job of people like Sullivan to review it for legality issues.  This guy is clearly not up to the job if he allowed this to pass.</p><p>And, really, if I give them no information at all, how are they going to prove it?  "Anyone not here, please raise your hand."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When this gets bounced out of court as un-Constitutional , I hope the city fires their attorney , Greg Sullivan .
It 's one thing for a clueless HR person to come up with BS like this , but it 's the job of people like Sullivan to review it for legality issues .
This guy is clearly not up to the job if he allowed this to pass.And , really , if I give them no information at all , how are they going to prove it ?
" Anyone not here , please raise your hand .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this gets bounced out of court as un-Constitutional, I hope the city fires their attorney, Greg Sullivan.
It's one thing for a clueless HR person to come up with BS like this, but it's the job of people like Sullivan to review it for legality issues.
This guy is clearly not up to the job if he allowed this to pass.And, really, if I give them no information at all, how are they going to prove it?
"Anyone not here, please raise your hand.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709</id>
	<title>Teach Your Children Well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all know to Net-proof kids right from single-digit ages not to provide identifying information to electronic correspondents that might be predators.</p><p>Now we're going to have to remember that "predators" needs to include "employers over a decade from now that may seize upon internet forum posts to take away your job or ruin your life".</p><p>So, kids: always set up accounts under a pseudonym.  Use DIFFERENT pseudonyms.  Strictly limit the friends that can connect your True Name (thx, Vernor Vinge) to your pseudonyms.  And do not provide specific identifying information in any post.   In forums that require True Names to work right (facebook), have Mom &amp; Dad help you learn to consider words, and especially photos, carefully.</p><p>What they post at nine won't be held against them, but if you start developing their radar early, the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.</p><p>As for that first generation now looking for their first jobs with all kinds of youthful exuberance on the internet not staying on the internet - yikes, sorry, you're screwed.  As the joke poster says, it may be your job to provide an example to others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know to Net-proof kids right from single-digit ages not to provide identifying information to electronic correspondents that might be predators.Now we 're going to have to remember that " predators " needs to include " employers over a decade from now that may seize upon internet forum posts to take away your job or ruin your life " .So , kids : always set up accounts under a pseudonym .
Use DIFFERENT pseudonyms .
Strictly limit the friends that can connect your True Name ( thx , Vernor Vinge ) to your pseudonyms .
And do not provide specific identifying information in any post .
In forums that require True Names to work right ( facebook ) , have Mom &amp; Dad help you learn to consider words , and especially photos , carefully.What they post at nine wo n't be held against them , but if you start developing their radar early , the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.As for that first generation now looking for their first jobs with all kinds of youthful exuberance on the internet not staying on the internet - yikes , sorry , you 're screwed .
As the joke poster says , it may be your job to provide an example to others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know to Net-proof kids right from single-digit ages not to provide identifying information to electronic correspondents that might be predators.Now we're going to have to remember that "predators" needs to include "employers over a decade from now that may seize upon internet forum posts to take away your job or ruin your life".So, kids: always set up accounts under a pseudonym.
Use DIFFERENT pseudonyms.
Strictly limit the friends that can connect your True Name (thx, Vernor Vinge) to your pseudonyms.
And do not provide specific identifying information in any post.
In forums that require True Names to work right (facebook), have Mom &amp; Dad help you learn to consider words, and especially photos, carefully.What they post at nine won't be held against them, but if you start developing their radar early, the appropriate attitudes of privacy and subterfuge will be reflexive by the late teens.As for that first generation now looking for their first jobs with all kinds of youthful exuberance on the internet not staying on the internet - yikes, sorry, you're screwed.
As the joke poster says, it may be your job to provide an example to others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381349</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245322440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Its on the <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_MASTER.pdf" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">Background check form</a> [bozeman.net].</p></div><p>So, surely the approach to take is create several accounts on 'questionable' services.  Use false names.  Or at least names that you can't call your own, say, the name of the person interviewing you.</p><p>Then publish the fact that, that person is surfing for those questionable sites at work.  Job done.</p><p>#DuuuushbagSlam.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its on the Background check form [ bozeman.net ] .So , surely the approach to take is create several accounts on 'questionable ' services .
Use false names .
Or at least names that you ca n't call your own , say , the name of the person interviewing you.Then publish the fact that , that person is surfing for those questionable sites at work .
Job done. # DuuuushbagSlam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its on the Background check form [bozeman.net].So, surely the approach to take is create several accounts on 'questionable' services.
Use false names.
Or at least names that you can't call your own, say, the name of the person interviewing you.Then publish the fact that, that person is surfing for those questionable sites at work.
Job done.#DuuuushbagSlam.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383527</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>Plekto</author>
	<datestamp>1245331980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is just plain moronic. You do NOT ask for people's passwords ever. That's bloody ridiculous. You'll get a total of two types, liars who give you nothing or fakes, or idiots you actually give you this info.<br>*****<br>Perhaps this is exactly what they want.  An instant way to cull out applicants of higher than DMV worker IQ.  Just perfect for obtaining drones who follow directions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is just plain moronic .
You do NOT ask for people 's passwords ever .
That 's bloody ridiculous .
You 'll get a total of two types , liars who give you nothing or fakes , or idiots you actually give you this info .
* * * * * Perhaps this is exactly what they want .
An instant way to cull out applicants of higher than DMV worker IQ .
Just perfect for obtaining drones who follow directions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is just plain moronic.
You do NOT ask for people's passwords ever.
That's bloody ridiculous.
You'll get a total of two types, liars who give you nothing or fakes, or idiots you actually give you this info.
*****Perhaps this is exactly what they want.
An instant way to cull out applicants of higher than DMV worker IQ.
Just perfect for obtaining drones who follow directions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377639</id>
	<title>high integrity</title>
	<author>TheGratefulNet</author>
	<datestamp>1245353760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>quoting:</p><p><i>"So, we have positions ranging from fire and police, which require people of high integrity for those positions,..."</i></p><p>police.  high integrity.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...head asplodes.</p><p>given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ (google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test!) I'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity' individuals.</p><p>they need to be able to beat you senseless and not have an issues at all about it.  and lie if it means covering for their fellow cops.</p><p>high integrity, indeed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>quoting : " So , we have positions ranging from fire and police , which require people of high integrity for those positions,... " police .
high integrity .
...head asplodes.given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ ( google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test !
) I 'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity ' individuals.they need to be able to beat you senseless and not have an issues at all about it .
and lie if it means covering for their fellow cops.high integrity , indeed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>quoting:"So, we have positions ranging from fire and police, which require people of high integrity for those positions,..."police.
high integrity.
...head asplodes.given that police have to be UNDER a certain IQ (google arond for the connecticut case where a cop applicant was denied for scoring TOO HIGH on an iq test!
) I'm not so sure that cops are 'high integrity' individuals.they need to be able to beat you senseless and not have an issues at all about it.
and lie if it means covering for their fellow cops.high integrity, indeed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386193</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1245354900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly city</i></p><p>Nahhhhh, I've seen your tourist campaigns on TV and Montanistan seems like a lovely place to visit.</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly cityNahhhhh , I 've seen your tourist campaigns on TV and Montanistan seems like a lovely place to visit.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly cityNahhhhh, I've seen your tourist campaigns on TV and Montanistan seems like a lovely place to visit.-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377695</id>
	<title>ToS</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1245353880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about the implications on ToS.  I know google is a little light on their terms when it comes to passwords and account<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<p>
<a href="http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en</a> [google.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>6.	Your passwords and account security

6.1	You agree and understand that you are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of passwords associated with any account you use to access the Services.

6.2	Accordingly, you agree that you will be solely responsible to Google for all activities that occur under your account.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>5.6 You agree that you are solely responsible for (and that Google has no responsibility to you or to any third party for) any breach of your obligations under the Terms and for the consequences (including any loss or damage which Google may suffer) of any such breach.</p></div><p>Facebook's terms of service are just as strict.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>4.6 You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.</p></div><p>I for one would not give that information and would suspect that the City is in violation of some law or other and that my providing usernames and passwords to these accounts would constitute my violation of terms of service and would get me in lots more trouble.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the implications on ToS .
I know google is a little light on their terms when it comes to passwords and account .. . http : //www.google.com/accounts/TOS ? hl = en [ google.com ] 6 .
Your passwords and account security 6.1 You agree and understand that you are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of passwords associated with any account you use to access the Services .
6.2 Accordingly , you agree that you will be solely responsible to Google for all activities that occur under your account.5.6 You agree that you are solely responsible for ( and that Google has no responsibility to you or to any third party for ) any breach of your obligations under the Terms and for the consequences ( including any loss or damage which Google may suffer ) of any such breach.Facebook 's terms of service are just as strict.4.6 You will not share your password , let anyone else access your account , or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.I for one would not give that information and would suspect that the City is in violation of some law or other and that my providing usernames and passwords to these accounts would constitute my violation of terms of service and would get me in lots more trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the implications on ToS.
I know google is a little light on their terms when it comes to passwords and account ...
http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en [google.com] 6.
Your passwords and account security

6.1	You agree and understand that you are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of passwords associated with any account you use to access the Services.
6.2	Accordingly, you agree that you will be solely responsible to Google for all activities that occur under your account.5.6 You agree that you are solely responsible for (and that Google has no responsibility to you or to any third party for) any breach of your obligations under the Terms and for the consequences (including any loss or damage which Google may suffer) of any such breach.Facebook's terms of service are just as strict.4.6 You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.I for one would not give that information and would suspect that the City is in violation of some law or other and that my providing usernames and passwords to these accounts would constitute my violation of terms of service and would get me in lots more trouble.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388349</id>
	<title>Not legal</title>
	<author>Biswalt</author>
	<datestamp>1245419520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now fucking way this is legal.  We have a right to freely assemble in this country, and that would include online communications.  Not to mention that listing what websites you participate in the forums of could reveal information that the government is not allowed to collect on people in determining whether they should be hired for a certain job.  For Example, I could be part of a gay-Jewish support group for example <a href="http://www.dayenu.org.au/" title="dayenu.org.au" rel="nofollow">An actual gay Jewsish support group</a> [dayenu.org.au] and that would be data that the state is not allowed to collect in determining who gets hired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now fucking way this is legal .
We have a right to freely assemble in this country , and that would include online communications .
Not to mention that listing what websites you participate in the forums of could reveal information that the government is not allowed to collect on people in determining whether they should be hired for a certain job .
For Example , I could be part of a gay-Jewish support group for example An actual gay Jewsish support group [ dayenu.org.au ] and that would be data that the state is not allowed to collect in determining who gets hired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now fucking way this is legal.
We have a right to freely assemble in this country, and that would include online communications.
Not to mention that listing what websites you participate in the forums of could reveal information that the government is not allowed to collect on people in determining whether they should be hired for a certain job.
For Example, I could be part of a gay-Jewish support group for example An actual gay Jewsish support group [dayenu.org.au] and that would be data that the state is not allowed to collect in determining who gets hired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378169</id>
	<title>ALL of them?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1245355080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My keychain has over 500 entries. That's not going to fit in 3 lines! Even assuming I was inclined to hand over things like the  password on my colo server, it'd be like the hovercraft license scene from "The Butterfly Kid".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My keychain has over 500 entries .
That 's not going to fit in 3 lines !
Even assuming I was inclined to hand over things like the password on my colo server , it 'd be like the hovercraft license scene from " The Butterfly Kid " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My keychain has over 500 entries.
That's not going to fit in 3 lines!
Even assuming I was inclined to hand over things like the  password on my colo server, it'd be like the hovercraft license scene from "The Butterfly Kid".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377625</id>
	<title>A Chance for some orginality.</title>
	<author>Kaldesh</author>
	<datestamp>1245353700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To me this would be an ultimate chance for some humor on my application. I would start writing down random sex sites (nothing illegal) and perhaps a few online dating sites, then make up some fake profiles. Hopefully that would teach these folks not to be so damn nosy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me this would be an ultimate chance for some humor on my application .
I would start writing down random sex sites ( nothing illegal ) and perhaps a few online dating sites , then make up some fake profiles .
Hopefully that would teach these folks not to be so damn nosy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me this would be an ultimate chance for some humor on my application.
I would start writing down random sex sites (nothing illegal) and perhaps a few online dating sites, then make up some fake profiles.
Hopefully that would teach these folks not to be so damn nosy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384791</id>
	<title>Easy Black Hat work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245340440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This smells very much like a subject for DEFCON... How quickly can you hack the database and gather all the userid's and passwords from an unencrypted database...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This smells very much like a subject for DEFCON... How quickly can you hack the database and gather all the userid 's and passwords from an unencrypted database.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This smells very much like a subject for DEFCON... How quickly can you hack the database and gather all the userid's and passwords from an unencrypted database...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378319</id>
	<title>Solution: obvious</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1245355440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the problem if you belong to enough social sites. Just put every place site you have signed up to on the three lines. If they can get an electron tunneling microscope set up to read what you put down, then they deserve a shot.

Oh, and forget to tell them that you scrambled the password-site-username lists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the problem if you belong to enough social sites .
Just put every place site you have signed up to on the three lines .
If they can get an electron tunneling microscope set up to read what you put down , then they deserve a shot .
Oh , and forget to tell them that you scrambled the password-site-username lists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the problem if you belong to enough social sites.
Just put every place site you have signed up to on the three lines.
If they can get an electron tunneling microscope set up to read what you put down, then they deserve a shot.
Oh, and forget to tell them that you scrambled the password-site-username lists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379103</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>schmiddy</author>
	<datestamp>1245357720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You jest, but it's actually common to see job postings phishing for all sorts of personal information up to and including SSNs and DOBs. Be careful with any job postings, particularly from companies you don't know/trust.

<a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2007/02/looking\_for\_a\_job\_phishers\_are.html" title="washingtonpost.com">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2007/02/looking\_for\_a\_job\_phishers\_are.html</a> [washingtonpost.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You jest , but it 's actually common to see job postings phishing for all sorts of personal information up to and including SSNs and DOBs .
Be careful with any job postings , particularly from companies you do n't know/trust .
http : //blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2007/02/looking \ _for \ _a \ _job \ _phishers \ _are.html [ washingtonpost.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You jest, but it's actually common to see job postings phishing for all sorts of personal information up to and including SSNs and DOBs.
Be careful with any job postings, particularly from companies you don't know/trust.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2007/02/looking\_for\_a\_job\_phishers\_are.html [washingtonpost.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388095</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245418020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily. They don't force you to make a decision against your will.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, private medical insurance and services have worked real fucking well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better , because it is done voluntarily .
They do n't force you to make a decision against your will.Yeah , private medical insurance and services have worked real fucking well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily.
They don't force you to make a decision against your will.Yeah, private medical insurance and services have worked real fucking well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379389</id>
	<title>Montanans did this?</title>
	<author>Phoenix666</author>
	<datestamp>1245358500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Montana is the state where the Freemen built a compound and refused to pay taxes.  It's also one of the very, very few states that absolutely, utterly refused to get onboard with the Federal RealID program.  I also grew up in the northwest corner of the state, a fourth-generation Montanan.  So I can't believe a real Montanan came up with this stupid idea.  Has to be a transplant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Montana is the state where the Freemen built a compound and refused to pay taxes .
It 's also one of the very , very few states that absolutely , utterly refused to get onboard with the Federal RealID program .
I also grew up in the northwest corner of the state , a fourth-generation Montanan .
So I ca n't believe a real Montanan came up with this stupid idea .
Has to be a transplant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Montana is the state where the Freemen built a compound and refused to pay taxes.
It's also one of the very, very few states that absolutely, utterly refused to get onboard with the Federal RealID program.
I also grew up in the northwest corner of the state, a fourth-generation Montanan.
So I can't believe a real Montanan came up with this stupid idea.
Has to be a transplant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379809</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245316560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They cannot base the descision to hire you off of race,sex,religion, family, etc. but they certainly can ask for statistical purposes. and social organizations are still considered public domain, most businesses require a backround check, and information located in a public domain certainly falls under that. That being said it is ridiculous to think they don't check for those things when they hire you, ask anyone coming out of college. recruiters often tell you to completely remove your account so there is no way it can be found and pictures/suggestive wall posts etc. cannot be used to give them a reason not to hire you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can not base the descision to hire you off of race,sex,religion , family , etc .
but they certainly can ask for statistical purposes .
and social organizations are still considered public domain , most businesses require a backround check , and information located in a public domain certainly falls under that .
That being said it is ridiculous to think they do n't check for those things when they hire you , ask anyone coming out of college .
recruiters often tell you to completely remove your account so there is no way it can be found and pictures/suggestive wall posts etc .
can not be used to give them a reason not to hire you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They cannot base the descision to hire you off of race,sex,religion, family, etc.
but they certainly can ask for statistical purposes.
and social organizations are still considered public domain, most businesses require a backround check, and information located in a public domain certainly falls under that.
That being said it is ridiculous to think they don't check for those things when they hire you, ask anyone coming out of college.
recruiters often tell you to completely remove your account so there is no way it can be found and pictures/suggestive wall posts etc.
cannot be used to give them a reason not to hire you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393863</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>NovaHorizon</author>
	<datestamp>1245442440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>can't say for the fire department, but in 'John Stossel Goes to Washington' he does investigate government's efficiency vs private sector efficiency in situations where the private sector as acquired ownership of a previously government owned/ran concept.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ca n't say for the fire department , but in 'John Stossel Goes to Washington ' he does investigate government 's efficiency vs private sector efficiency in situations where the private sector as acquired ownership of a previously government owned/ran concept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can't say for the fire department, but in 'John Stossel Goes to Washington' he does investigate government's efficiency vs private sector efficiency in situations where the private sector as acquired ownership of a previously government owned/ran concept.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378475</id>
	<title>Montana and Background Checks</title>
	<author>PvtVoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245355860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Bozeman, Montana is now requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information for 'background checking.'</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Montana is crazy about background checks. For example, faculty job applicants at University of Montana must agree to a background check even to <i>interview</i> for a job (<a href="http://www.umt.edu/jobs/FAC/apfe.html" title="umt.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.umt.edu/jobs/FAC/apfe.html</a> [umt.edu]).
<br> <br>
Only in Montana can one buy a handgun with no more than a driver's license (<a href="http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws\_mt.htm" title="about.com" rel="nofollow">http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws\_mt.htm</a> [about.com]), but must go through a full background check to give a talk at the university.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bozeman , Montana is now requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information for 'background checking .
' Montana is crazy about background checks .
For example , faculty job applicants at University of Montana must agree to a background check even to interview for a job ( http : //www.umt.edu/jobs/FAC/apfe.html [ umt.edu ] ) .
Only in Montana can one buy a handgun with no more than a driver 's license ( http : //crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws \ _mt.htm [ about.com ] ) , but must go through a full background check to give a talk at the university .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bozeman, Montana is now requiring all applicants for city jobs to furnish Internet account information for 'background checking.
'

Montana is crazy about background checks.
For example, faculty job applicants at University of Montana must agree to a background check even to interview for a job (http://www.umt.edu/jobs/FAC/apfe.html [umt.edu]).
Only in Montana can one buy a handgun with no more than a driver's license (http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws\_mt.htm [about.com]), but must go through a full background check to give a talk at the university.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386777</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, we are going to have to let you go.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245404520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't so "Funny", it's quite plausible that this could be used as a technicality to fire somebody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't so " Funny " , it 's quite plausible that this could be used as a technicality to fire somebody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't so "Funny", it's quite plausible that this could be used as a technicality to fire somebody.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377889</id>
	<title>They'll go as far as they can get away  with</title>
	<author>jctownend</author>
	<datestamp>1245354360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is rich. I hope nobody is dumb enough to give up all this just because they're asking for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is rich .
I hope nobody is dumb enough to give up all this just because they 're asking for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is rich.
I hope nobody is dumb enough to give up all this just because they're asking for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379659</id>
	<title>Re:Tastless, definitely, but brings up a good poin</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1245316140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediums</i></p><p>You got something against beer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediumsYou got something against beer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a good ideas to weed out potential douche bags with less than a shake of common sense not to plaster their beer drinking photos all over public internet mediumsYou got something against beer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379399</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>myth24601</author>
	<datestamp>1245358500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Keys to my house?</p><p>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?</p></div></blockquote><p>No thanks, she already gave me both.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keys to my house ? Maybe a beaver shot of my wife ? No thanks , she already gave me both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keys to my house?Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?No thanks, she already gave me both.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380459</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?</p></div><p>Oh, the grammar! It's "shot <em>by</em> my wife"... or... oh. Ah, I see what you mean. So it's more like a beaver shot by <em>you</em> then.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife ? Oh , the grammar !
It 's " shot by my wife " ... or... oh .
Ah , I see what you mean .
So it 's more like a beaver shot by you then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?Oh, the grammar!
It's "shot by my wife"... or... oh.
Ah, I see what you mean.
So it's more like a beaver shot by you then.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388443</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>Biswalt</author>
	<datestamp>1245419940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well you're Iranian and Syrian, seems to me Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino) works.  Good thing you're from Iran and Syria, if you were from just one you'd be up shits creek.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well you 're Iranian and Syrian , seems to me Two or More Races ( Not Hispanic or Latino ) works .
Good thing you 're from Iran and Syria , if you were from just one you 'd be up shits creek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well you're Iranian and Syrian, seems to me Two or More Races (Not Hispanic or Latino) works.
Good thing you're from Iran and Syria, if you were from just one you'd be up shits creek.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377579</id>
	<title>Not against the US constitution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone told Scott Adams (Dilbert) about this one yet?</p><p>I love the way they say "none of the things that the federal constitution lists as protected things"... so the right to privacy is not protected in the US? But i remember a judge throwing out a case where a cop read someone's diary without a warrant... the Judge rules that the right to privacy is essential to the right to free speech, for if we must censor our thoughts, we cannot be free.</p><p>The scary thing is, if things like this spread, they become impossible to avoid. Given a choice of working (and so not being homeless) or being free, well, most people will trade in their liberty, and those who don't starve or end up in jail, and the bastards *win*.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone told Scott Adams ( Dilbert ) about this one yet ? I love the way they say " none of the things that the federal constitution lists as protected things " ... so the right to privacy is not protected in the US ?
But i remember a judge throwing out a case where a cop read someone 's diary without a warrant... the Judge rules that the right to privacy is essential to the right to free speech , for if we must censor our thoughts , we can not be free.The scary thing is , if things like this spread , they become impossible to avoid .
Given a choice of working ( and so not being homeless ) or being free , well , most people will trade in their liberty , and those who do n't starve or end up in jail , and the bastards * win * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone told Scott Adams (Dilbert) about this one yet?I love the way they say "none of the things that the federal constitution lists as protected things"... so the right to privacy is not protected in the US?
But i remember a judge throwing out a case where a cop read someone's diary without a warrant... the Judge rules that the right to privacy is essential to the right to free speech, for if we must censor our thoughts, we cannot be free.The scary thing is, if things like this spread, they become impossible to avoid.
Given a choice of working (and so not being homeless) or being free, well, most people will trade in their liberty, and those who don't starve or end up in jail, and the bastards *win*.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379059</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>MountainLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1245357540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Religion is another.  "Oh, I see from your application that you have an account at the Methodist church forum.  We are only hiring Lutherans today."  While anybody can hit Google, you are right that formalizing it is just a law suit waiting to happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Religion is another .
" Oh , I see from your application that you have an account at the Methodist church forum .
We are only hiring Lutherans today .
" While anybody can hit Google , you are right that formalizing it is just a law suit waiting to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religion is another.
"Oh, I see from your application that you have an account at the Methodist church forum.
We are only hiring Lutherans today.
"  While anybody can hit Google, you are right that formalizing it is just a law suit waiting to happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, new plan:</p><p>1) Make up phony job.<br>2) Put up lots of "now hiring" signs.<br>3) Ask for online account information, passwords.<br>4) Massive credit card fraud -- chances are people use the same passwords for everything<br>5) PROFIT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , new plan : 1 ) Make up phony job.2 ) Put up lots of " now hiring " signs.3 ) Ask for online account information , passwords.4 ) Massive credit card fraud -- chances are people use the same passwords for everything5 ) PROFIT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, new plan:1) Make up phony job.2) Put up lots of "now hiring" signs.3) Ask for online account information, passwords.4) Massive credit card fraud -- chances are people use the same passwords for everything5) PROFIT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379045</id>
	<title>uhh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245357480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hell no</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hell no</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hell no</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382849</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>AK Marc</author>
	<datestamp>1245329100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Maybe my bank access info?</i> <br> <br>That's already required.  I access my bank, my credit cards, my utility bills and such online.  So I'd be required to give up that information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe my bank access info ?
That 's already required .
I access my bank , my credit cards , my utility bills and such online .
So I 'd be required to give up that information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe my bank access info?
That's already required.
I access my bank, my credit cards, my utility bills and such online.
So I'd be required to give up that information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377977</id>
	<title>Bozeman Needs a New City Attorney</title>
	<author>SwashbucklingCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1245354540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That understand that violating peoples' privacy is wrong, even when your intentions are good.</p><p>He also needs to understand Terms of Service and that asking people to provide passwords can be a violation of ToS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That understand that violating peoples ' privacy is wrong , even when your intentions are good.He also needs to understand Terms of Service and that asking people to provide passwords can be a violation of ToS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That understand that violating peoples' privacy is wrong, even when your intentions are good.He also needs to understand Terms of Service and that asking people to provide passwords can be a violation of ToS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389341</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, we are going to have to let you go.</title>
	<author>Beezlebub33</author>
	<datestamp>1245423840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you really think that they're going to hire someone with a slashdot name of 'sexconker'??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think that they 're going to hire someone with a slashdot name of 'sexconker ' ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think that they're going to hire someone with a slashdot name of 'sexconker'?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380041</id>
	<title>This is a job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For goatse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For goatse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For goatse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386001</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>wellingj</author>
	<datestamp>1245353220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The police force protects your property by their existence. Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.</p></div><p>Armed law abiding citizens also protect their own property, and this deters crime.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The police force protects your property by their existence .
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences , and this deters crime.Armed law abiding citizens also protect their own property , and this deters crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The police force protects your property by their existence.
Potential criminals know there will likely be consequences, and this deters crime.Armed law abiding citizens also protect their own property, and this deters crime.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378909</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245357060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think this story is crazy enough, people you didn't read the document far enough.  They want you to also waive the State Consititution's protections!</p><p>In accordance with Montana Constitution, [...], I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including myself.</p><p>Is is possible to sign away your constitutionally protected rights?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think this story is crazy enough , people you did n't read the document far enough .
They want you to also waive the State Consititution 's protections ! In accordance with Montana Constitution , [ ... ] , I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process ; however , by signing below , I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person , including myself.Is is possible to sign away your constitutionally protected rights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think this story is crazy enough, people you didn't read the document far enough.
They want you to also waive the State Consititution's protections!In accordance with Montana Constitution, [...], I understand I have the right to review information obtained through the reference check process; however, by signing below, I realize the City of Bozeman will NOT release the information provided to them to any person, including myself.Is is possible to sign away your constitutionally protected rights?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379575</id>
	<title>Wow..</title>
	<author>Roskolnikov</author>
	<datestamp>1245315840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully their data retention rules for job applicantions is to destroy immediately; my banking is done via a website on which I hold an account to which I have a password.  Suddenly the most powerful person in Bozeman is the HR director for the city.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully their data retention rules for job applicantions is to destroy immediately ; my banking is done via a website on which I hold an account to which I have a password .
Suddenly the most powerful person in Bozeman is the HR director for the city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully their data retention rules for job applicantions is to destroy immediately; my banking is done via a website on which I hold an account to which I have a password.
Suddenly the most powerful person in Bozeman is the HR director for the city.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378887</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>node 3</author>
	<datestamp>1245356940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department.</p></div><p>Only true due to your lack of experience with a sufficiently large sample of municipal fire departments.</p><p>On the other hand, you have the evidence of "it fits with your theory about how things work", so unfounded assertions away!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department.Only true due to your lack of experience with a sufficiently large sample of municipal fire departments.On the other hand , you have the evidence of " it fits with your theory about how things work " , so unfounded assertions away !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything I have ever seen indicates that it is a more efficient organization than any government fire department.Only true due to your lack of experience with a sufficiently large sample of municipal fire departments.On the other hand, you have the evidence of "it fits with your theory about how things work", so unfounded assertions away!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380079</id>
	<title>Re:What counts as business?</title>
	<author>sloth jr</author>
	<datestamp>1245317400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bozemanite replying here. I spoke with our city's HR department this morning concerning this. I don't think anyone's crazy here, even though this policy certainly is. Everyone I spoke with was (as is normal in Bozeman) utterly courteous, friendly and respectful. Given the overwhelming local sentiment against this policy, it's clear that someone made an error here (and then unfortunately, defended that error on local TV). I believe a quick course correction will occur shortly (fervently hope so, in any event; it'll be an interesting city election next year otherwise)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bozemanite replying here .
I spoke with our city 's HR department this morning concerning this .
I do n't think anyone 's crazy here , even though this policy certainly is .
Everyone I spoke with was ( as is normal in Bozeman ) utterly courteous , friendly and respectful .
Given the overwhelming local sentiment against this policy , it 's clear that someone made an error here ( and then unfortunately , defended that error on local TV ) .
I believe a quick course correction will occur shortly ( fervently hope so , in any event ; it 'll be an interesting city election next year otherwise )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bozemanite replying here.
I spoke with our city's HR department this morning concerning this.
I don't think anyone's crazy here, even though this policy certainly is.
Everyone I spoke with was (as is normal in Bozeman) utterly courteous, friendly and respectful.
Given the overwhelming local sentiment against this policy, it's clear that someone made an error here (and then unfortunately, defended that error on local TV).
I believe a quick course correction will occur shortly (fervently hope so, in any event; it'll be an interesting city election next year otherwise)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383771</id>
	<title>Blatently Unconstitutional</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245333360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will *never* pass muster, once the first person challenges it in Federal court. The government is blatantly chilling applicants' First Amendment rights ("Freedom to assemble." The fact that it is electronic is of no consequence in that it infringes on the freedom of association.)  Next: What is your political affiliation? What are your particular religious beliefs?  Oh wait -- that's exactly what this question is plausibly asking!</p><p>Repeat after me: The States can grant <i>greater</i> rights than the US Constitution, but they can in not abridge the rights therein.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will * never * pass muster , once the first person challenges it in Federal court .
The government is blatantly chilling applicants ' First Amendment rights ( " Freedom to assemble .
" The fact that it is electronic is of no consequence in that it infringes on the freedom of association .
) Next : What is your political affiliation ?
What are your particular religious beliefs ?
Oh wait -- that 's exactly what this question is plausibly asking ! Repeat after me : The States can grant greater rights than the US Constitution , but they can in not abridge the rights therein .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will *never* pass muster, once the first person challenges it in Federal court.
The government is blatantly chilling applicants' First Amendment rights ("Freedom to assemble.
" The fact that it is electronic is of no consequence in that it infringes on the freedom of association.
)  Next: What is your political affiliation?
What are your particular religious beliefs?
Oh wait -- that's exactly what this question is plausibly asking!Repeat after me: The States can grant greater rights than the US Constitution, but they can in not abridge the rights therein.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28390417</id>
	<title>Re:My password</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245428160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My password is Robert');DROP TABLE students;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My password is Robert ' ) ; DROP TABLE students ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My password is Robert');DROP TABLE students;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>sloth jr</author>
	<datestamp>1245355140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm living in Bozeman, great community - and believe me, there's a ton of uproar here about this. I spoke this morning with the city's HR department, trying to get a hold of our city attorney.

This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly city (there are strong optics and software/service companies already operating here).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm living in Bozeman , great community - and believe me , there 's a ton of uproar here about this .
I spoke this morning with the city 's HR department , trying to get a hold of our city attorney .
This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly city ( there are strong optics and software/service companies already operating here ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm living in Bozeman, great community - and believe me, there's a ton of uproar here about this.
I spoke this morning with the city's HR department, trying to get a hold of our city attorney.
This has certainly done a lot of damage to our credibility as a tech friendly city (there are strong optics and software/service companies already operating here).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377349</id>
	<title>HAHA OH WOW</title>
	<author>Riddler Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Asking for your online hangouts is in poor taste, but asking for your USER NAMES AND PASSWORDS is in absolutely horrendous practice. It'll probably breed an entire employee base that's comfortable with putting in their user name and password into a site that TOTALLY looks like their bank's website except it has some odd porn ads for some reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Asking for your online hangouts is in poor taste , but asking for your USER NAMES AND PASSWORDS is in absolutely horrendous practice .
It 'll probably breed an entire employee base that 's comfortable with putting in their user name and password into a site that TOTALLY looks like their bank 's website except it has some odd porn ads for some reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asking for your online hangouts is in poor taste, but asking for your USER NAMES AND PASSWORDS is in absolutely horrendous practice.
It'll probably breed an entire employee base that's comfortable with putting in their user name and password into a site that TOTALLY looks like their bank's website except it has some odd porn ads for some reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379507</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Tekfactory</author>
	<datestamp>1245315720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had to do a bunch of tech installs for the USDA back in 1997, we were putting network cards into Windows 3.11 Machines, installing Netscape, network printing, and 10 Mbit networking was being wired in all the offices.</p><p>Until I hit Bozeman, the site had already been done by the local USDA the year before as a technology demonstrator, it was 100 Mbit everywhere. They told us to pack up our crap and take it elsewhere. Nice town, friendly folks, I still have pictures from that trip.</p><p>The folks in Butte, Miles City and Minot did  not have 100 Mbit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had to do a bunch of tech installs for the USDA back in 1997 , we were putting network cards into Windows 3.11 Machines , installing Netscape , network printing , and 10 Mbit networking was being wired in all the offices.Until I hit Bozeman , the site had already been done by the local USDA the year before as a technology demonstrator , it was 100 Mbit everywhere .
They told us to pack up our crap and take it elsewhere .
Nice town , friendly folks , I still have pictures from that trip.The folks in Butte , Miles City and Minot did not have 100 Mbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had to do a bunch of tech installs for the USDA back in 1997, we were putting network cards into Windows 3.11 Machines, installing Netscape, network printing, and 10 Mbit networking was being wired in all the offices.Until I hit Bozeman, the site had already been done by the local USDA the year before as a technology demonstrator, it was 100 Mbit everywhere.
They told us to pack up our crap and take it elsewhere.
Nice town, friendly folks, I still have pictures from that trip.The folks in Butte, Miles City and Minot did  not have 100 Mbit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377571</id>
	<title>Guaranteed Hire?</title>
	<author>SketchOfNight</author>
	<datestamp>1245353580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're all looking at this the wrong way - it's now become easier to fake who you are on a resume than ever before!
<br>
<br>Step 1: Create fake profiles with perfect friends and political affiliations to suit your employer.
<br>Step 2: Make bogus filler posts
<br>Step 3: ???
<br>Step 4: Prof--err, hired!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're all looking at this the wrong way - it 's now become easier to fake who you are on a resume than ever before !
Step 1 : Create fake profiles with perfect friends and political affiliations to suit your employer .
Step 2 : Make bogus filler posts Step 3 : ? ? ?
Step 4 : Prof--err , hired !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're all looking at this the wrong way - it's now become easier to fake who you are on a resume than ever before!
Step 1: Create fake profiles with perfect friends and political affiliations to suit your employer.
Step 2: Make bogus filler posts
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Prof--err, hired!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378125</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1245354960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be really tough, especially getting the beaver to hold the camera and take a picture of your wife.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be really tough , especially getting the beaver to hold the camera and take a picture of your wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be really tough, especially getting the beaver to hold the camera and take a picture of your wife.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379929</id>
	<title>I've got three sites</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1245316980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Site 1: <a href="http://www.suck.com/" title="suck.com">http://www.suck.com/</a> [suck.com]<br>Site 2: <a href="http://www.my.com/" title="my.com">http://www.my.com/</a> [my.com]<br>Site 3: <a href="http://www.wang.com/" title="wang.com">http://www.wang.com/</a> [wang.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Site 1 : http : //www.suck.com/ [ suck.com ] Site 2 : http : //www.my.com/ [ my.com ] Site 3 : http : //www.wang.com/ [ wang.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Site 1: http://www.suck.com/ [suck.com]Site 2: http://www.my.com/ [my.com]Site 3: http://www.wang.com/ [wang.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I lived in Bozeman, Montana I'd try to move if I could. They're only going to get really, really stupid applicants and the city's services will be pure crap. I'd be willing to bet they have no union -- unions won't stand for that kind of crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I lived in Bozeman , Montana I 'd try to move if I could .
They 're only going to get really , really stupid applicants and the city 's services will be pure crap .
I 'd be willing to bet they have no union -- unions wo n't stand for that kind of crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I lived in Bozeman, Montana I'd try to move if I could.
They're only going to get really, really stupid applicants and the city's services will be pure crap.
I'd be willing to bet they have no union -- unions won't stand for that kind of crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381239</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>ChaosDiscord</author>
	<datestamp>1245321900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The police force does not protect you or your property,...</p></div></blockquote><p>The risk of apprehension decreases the benefit of committing a crime.  As a result, some people decide the risk is too high and don't commit the crime in the first place.  Absent police, the risk decreases, the benefit increases, and some people will decide to commit crimes.

</p><p>Furthermore, I've got better things to do with my life than hide in my house armed with a shotgun defending my property.  I lack the money to hire someone to do the job for me.  (And even if I could, what if the person I hire decides today he's going to rob his client and skip town?)  There is, unfortunately, always a risk of having stuff stolen or damaged.  The existence of law enforcement increases the likelihood of apprehension of the criminal.  There is a chance they'll spend some time in prison, which should at least make one happy from a revenge standpoint.  There is also a chance they can recover some of your stolen property, which is nice.  And having police track the criminal down makes it easier to sue them for the damage and theft and potentially get some reimbursement.

</p><p>And I and my insurance company certainly appreciated having a police officer to act as a neutral third party observer to document the aftermath of the fender bender I was involved in today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The police force does not protect you or your property,...The risk of apprehension decreases the benefit of committing a crime .
As a result , some people decide the risk is too high and do n't commit the crime in the first place .
Absent police , the risk decreases , the benefit increases , and some people will decide to commit crimes .
Furthermore , I 've got better things to do with my life than hide in my house armed with a shotgun defending my property .
I lack the money to hire someone to do the job for me .
( And even if I could , what if the person I hire decides today he 's going to rob his client and skip town ?
) There is , unfortunately , always a risk of having stuff stolen or damaged .
The existence of law enforcement increases the likelihood of apprehension of the criminal .
There is a chance they 'll spend some time in prison , which should at least make one happy from a revenge standpoint .
There is also a chance they can recover some of your stolen property , which is nice .
And having police track the criminal down makes it easier to sue them for the damage and theft and potentially get some reimbursement .
And I and my insurance company certainly appreciated having a police officer to act as a neutral third party observer to document the aftermath of the fender bender I was involved in today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The police force does not protect you or your property,...The risk of apprehension decreases the benefit of committing a crime.
As a result, some people decide the risk is too high and don't commit the crime in the first place.
Absent police, the risk decreases, the benefit increases, and some people will decide to commit crimes.
Furthermore, I've got better things to do with my life than hide in my house armed with a shotgun defending my property.
I lack the money to hire someone to do the job for me.
(And even if I could, what if the person I hire decides today he's going to rob his client and skip town?
)  There is, unfortunately, always a risk of having stuff stolen or damaged.
The existence of law enforcement increases the likelihood of apprehension of the criminal.
There is a chance they'll spend some time in prison, which should at least make one happy from a revenge standpoint.
There is also a chance they can recover some of your stolen property, which is nice.
And having police track the criminal down makes it easier to sue them for the damage and theft and potentially get some reimbursement.
And I and my insurance company certainly appreciated having a police officer to act as a neutral third party observer to document the aftermath of the fender bender I was involved in today.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379141</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1245357840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Government agents DO work on your behalf; at least, they do if your government doesn't suck. The Federal Government is (or should be) there to protect your rights and freedoms. State government is there to build roads and hospitals, and write speeding tickets to the rich morons in their Escalades who insist on driving at twice the speed limit on a snow-packed road endangering your life and property. Local governments are there to provide fire protection, police, etc.</p><p>If there were no cops there's no way in hell I'd stagger home from Felber's. I'm glad they're there to arrest drunk drivers and muggers.</p><p>The private sector does NOT do everything better. CWLP, my electric company, is city-owned. We have the lowest electric rates in the state, and it's not subsidized. I haven't lost power once since the tornados in 2006. When the two F-2 tornados tore up the town, everyone had electric service in a week or less, even though my neighborhood didn't have a single utility pole still standing.</p><p>A few months later a single F-1 hit the St Louis area, it took the Amerin corporation over a month to have everyone's electricity back on.</p><p>Crooks taking your money and liberty is BAD government. Start voting and maybe you can have GOOD government.</p><p>Anarchy always leads to monarchy, which is the absolute worst form of government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Government agents DO work on your behalf ; at least , they do if your government does n't suck .
The Federal Government is ( or should be ) there to protect your rights and freedoms .
State government is there to build roads and hospitals , and write speeding tickets to the rich morons in their Escalades who insist on driving at twice the speed limit on a snow-packed road endangering your life and property .
Local governments are there to provide fire protection , police , etc.If there were no cops there 's no way in hell I 'd stagger home from Felber 's .
I 'm glad they 're there to arrest drunk drivers and muggers.The private sector does NOT do everything better .
CWLP , my electric company , is city-owned .
We have the lowest electric rates in the state , and it 's not subsidized .
I have n't lost power once since the tornados in 2006 .
When the two F-2 tornados tore up the town , everyone had electric service in a week or less , even though my neighborhood did n't have a single utility pole still standing.A few months later a single F-1 hit the St Louis area , it took the Amerin corporation over a month to have everyone 's electricity back on.Crooks taking your money and liberty is BAD government .
Start voting and maybe you can have GOOD government.Anarchy always leads to monarchy , which is the absolute worst form of government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Government agents DO work on your behalf; at least, they do if your government doesn't suck.
The Federal Government is (or should be) there to protect your rights and freedoms.
State government is there to build roads and hospitals, and write speeding tickets to the rich morons in their Escalades who insist on driving at twice the speed limit on a snow-packed road endangering your life and property.
Local governments are there to provide fire protection, police, etc.If there were no cops there's no way in hell I'd stagger home from Felber's.
I'm glad they're there to arrest drunk drivers and muggers.The private sector does NOT do everything better.
CWLP, my electric company, is city-owned.
We have the lowest electric rates in the state, and it's not subsidized.
I haven't lost power once since the tornados in 2006.
When the two F-2 tornados tore up the town, everyone had electric service in a week or less, even though my neighborhood didn't have a single utility pole still standing.A few months later a single F-1 hit the St Louis area, it took the Amerin corporation over a month to have everyone's electricity back on.Crooks taking your money and liberty is BAD government.
Start voting and maybe you can have GOOD government.Anarchy always leads to monarchy, which is the absolute worst form of government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378811</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245356700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Montana is great... but the transplanted Californians are f***ing it up. I'd bet money this winner of an idea didn't come from a Montana native.</p><p>No, this came from the invasion of West Coast morons. The folks that stop fire departments from being built because they aren't "green" enough. The folks that try to pass subdivision-style regulations on sheds and lawns... in areas that are ranches, and have been for over 100 years!</p><p>So all you Left Coast people take note: don't bring California with you when you move to Montana.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Montana is great... but the transplanted Californians are f * * * ing it up .
I 'd bet money this winner of an idea did n't come from a Montana native.No , this came from the invasion of West Coast morons .
The folks that stop fire departments from being built because they are n't " green " enough .
The folks that try to pass subdivision-style regulations on sheds and lawns... in areas that are ranches , and have been for over 100 years ! So all you Left Coast people take note : do n't bring California with you when you move to Montana .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Montana is great... but the transplanted Californians are f***ing it up.
I'd bet money this winner of an idea didn't come from a Montana native.No, this came from the invasion of West Coast morons.
The folks that stop fire departments from being built because they aren't "green" enough.
The folks that try to pass subdivision-style regulations on sheds and lawns... in areas that are ranches, and have been for over 100 years!So all you Left Coast people take note: don't bring California with you when you move to Montana.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381295</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1245322200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was waiting for you to tell us you'd come across a secret bank account and needed help getting the money out of the country<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was waiting for you to tell us you 'd come across a secret bank account and needed help getting the money out of the country .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was waiting for you to tell us you'd come across a secret bank account and needed help getting the money out of the country ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377449</id>
	<title>also...</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1245353280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Further instructions on the form:
</p><p>16d. Please analyze your own handwriting for us, and supply a full report on whether the results show that you may be predisposed to workplace violence.</p><p>16e. Please build your own polygraph machine, administer the test to yourself, and let us know whether it turns up any proclivity for white collar crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Further instructions on the form : 16d .
Please analyze your own handwriting for us , and supply a full report on whether the results show that you may be predisposed to workplace violence.16e .
Please build your own polygraph machine , administer the test to yourself , and let us know whether it turns up any proclivity for white collar crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Further instructions on the form:
16d.
Please analyze your own handwriting for us, and supply a full report on whether the results show that you may be predisposed to workplace violence.16e.
Please build your own polygraph machine, administer the test to yourself, and let us know whether it turns up any proclivity for white collar crime.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388679</id>
	<title>The application is hilarious</title>
	<author>Biswalt</author>
	<datestamp>1245421020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So not only does it request info the government is supposed to be barred from using to make hiring decisions, it also only has space for two websites.  Cause you know most tech savy people have limited their responses to just the two websites and the fuck-tarded thing about this is that they actually list five different example websites!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So not only does it request info the government is supposed to be barred from using to make hiring decisions , it also only has space for two websites .
Cause you know most tech savy people have limited their responses to just the two websites and the fuck-tarded thing about this is that they actually list five different example websites !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So not only does it request info the government is supposed to be barred from using to make hiring decisions, it also only has space for two websites.
Cause you know most tech savy people have limited their responses to just the two websites and the fuck-tarded thing about this is that they actually list five different example websites!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378443</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, we are going to have to let you go.</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1245355740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then it's lawyer time.</p><p>Shit, I might move there, get some lame job, fill out the application and write N/A, then talk all day about twitter and facebook and myspace.</p><p>When I get fired, I'll claim it was because of that, and money grubbing lawyers will be frothing at the mouth to represent me and get a chunk of my millions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then it 's lawyer time.Shit , I might move there , get some lame job , fill out the application and write N/A , then talk all day about twitter and facebook and myspace.When I get fired , I 'll claim it was because of that , and money grubbing lawyers will be frothing at the mouth to represent me and get a chunk of my millions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then it's lawyer time.Shit, I might move there, get some lame job, fill out the application and write N/A, then talk all day about twitter and facebook and myspace.When I get fired, I'll claim it was because of that, and money grubbing lawyers will be frothing at the mouth to represent me and get a chunk of my millions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381727</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1245324120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My fire department had their trucks donated by the absurdly rich family that own's half of this town.  I suspect this sort of thing isn't very common though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My fire department had their trucks donated by the absurdly rich family that own 's half of this town .
I suspect this sort of thing is n't very common though ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My fire department had their trucks donated by the absurdly rich family that own's half of this town.
I suspect this sort of thing isn't very common though ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377501</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1245353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going off a hunch here, but I'm guessing this is pretty much illegal, too. Not to mention that every website in question probably has policies against giving out your account info.</p><p>that or you can sue Montana City for violating your privacy even with giving them the information, I'd suspect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going off a hunch here , but I 'm guessing this is pretty much illegal , too .
Not to mention that every website in question probably has policies against giving out your account info.that or you can sue Montana City for violating your privacy even with giving them the information , I 'd suspect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going off a hunch here, but I'm guessing this is pretty much illegal, too.
Not to mention that every website in question probably has policies against giving out your account info.that or you can sue Montana City for violating your privacy even with giving them the information, I'd suspect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378031</id>
	<title>Is this a test?</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1245354660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, seriously, is this a test?<br>
One where anybody dumb enough to give out that info automatically fails for an inability to maintain the most basic of security measures and violating the use agreement or policy of the online services they use...<br> <br>

[sniff]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...what is that smell?... wait a second, I remember that smell.... it smells like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... bloodthirsty sharks....<br>
RUN!  THE LAWYERS ARE CONVERGING FOR A FEEDING FRENZY!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , seriously , is this a test ?
One where anybody dumb enough to give out that info automatically fails for an inability to maintain the most basic of security measures and violating the use agreement or policy of the online services they use.. . [ sniff ] ...what is that smell ? .. .
wait a second , I remember that smell.... it smells like ... bloodthirsty sharks... . RUN ! THE LAWYERS ARE CONVERGING FOR A FEEDING FRENZY ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, seriously, is this a test?
One where anybody dumb enough to give out that info automatically fails for an inability to maintain the most basic of security measures and violating the use agreement or policy of the online services they use... 

[sniff] ...what is that smell?...
wait a second, I remember that smell.... it smells like ... bloodthirsty sharks....
RUN!  THE LAWYERS ARE CONVERGING FOR A FEEDING FRENZY!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379151</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1245357840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I understand the uproar about asking for passwords, even asking for usernames and websites is an huge invasion of privacy that shouldn't be tolerated. It's none of their damn business. The only exception to this is if you own business that would constitute a conflict of interest with your job, and that relates to the business whether it has a website or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I understand the uproar about asking for passwords , even asking for usernames and websites is an huge invasion of privacy that should n't be tolerated .
It 's none of their damn business .
The only exception to this is if you own business that would constitute a conflict of interest with your job , and that relates to the business whether it has a website or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I understand the uproar about asking for passwords, even asking for usernames and websites is an huge invasion of privacy that shouldn't be tolerated.
It's none of their damn business.
The only exception to this is if you own business that would constitute a conflict of interest with your job, and that relates to the business whether it has a website or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377671</id>
	<title>Bozoman, MT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What else would you expect?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What else would you expect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What else would you expect?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</id>
	<title>Worst Policy EVAR!!!  EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>Derekloffin</author>
	<datestamp>1245352980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is just plain moronic.  You do NOT ask for people's passwords ever.  That's bloody ridiculous.  You'll get a total of two types, liars who give you nothing or fakes, or idiots you actually give you this info.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is just plain moronic .
You do NOT ask for people 's passwords ever .
That 's bloody ridiculous .
You 'll get a total of two types , liars who give you nothing or fakes , or idiots you actually give you this info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is just plain moronic.
You do NOT ask for people's passwords ever.
That's bloody ridiculous.
You'll get a total of two types, liars who give you nothing or fakes, or idiots you actually give you this info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392883</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1245438840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the U.S. from the period of about 1800 thru 1850. Almost everything was private sector. Roads were only built as needed by industry; people had to pay for education and most didn't get any; private police... well, we still have that in some places, we call it the Mob.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the U.S. from the period of about 1800 thru 1850 .
Almost everything was private sector .
Roads were only built as needed by industry ; people had to pay for education and most did n't get any ; private police... well , we still have that in some places , we call it the Mob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the U.S. from the period of about 1800 thru 1850.
Almost everything was private sector.
Roads were only built as needed by industry; people had to pay for education and most didn't get any; private police... well, we still have that in some places, we call it the Mob.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380199</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1245317820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dissent != descent.</p><p>That said, you have a good point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dissent ! = descent.That said , you have a good point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dissent != descent.That said, you have a good point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380609</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1245319440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that, but forcing a person to break a legal contract as a condition of employment is illegal (most website's TOS forbids password sharing), and by knowingly logging in with false credentials, you've committed computer fraud.</p><p>We're not just talking monetary penalties here. This is a felony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , but forcing a person to break a legal contract as a condition of employment is illegal ( most website 's TOS forbids password sharing ) , and by knowingly logging in with false credentials , you 've committed computer fraud.We 're not just talking monetary penalties here .
This is a felony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, but forcing a person to break a legal contract as a condition of employment is illegal (most website's TOS forbids password sharing), and by knowingly logging in with false credentials, you've committed computer fraud.We're not just talking monetary penalties here.
This is a felony.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391893</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>jgostling</author>
	<datestamp>1245434640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And smart ones who point out the issue...<br> <br>
Cheers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And smart ones who point out the issue.. . Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And smart ones who point out the issue... 
Cheers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381011</id>
	<title>Check the 4th amanedant fellas</title>
	<author>AnAdventurer</author>
	<datestamp>1245321060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a part about submitting to administrative searches. As in; If you want to do into the courthouse they make you go though a metal detector and your stuff through the x-ray machine.<p>
While this is a bit strange that it is to to be self reported (but they can only on check what you tell them - for the most part). It is searching you via self-reported background information. They have every right to check what you are into in order for you to get the job. </p><p>
For now I am ignoring the whole password part, that is crazy talk. And there is no way a court rule in favor of making you hand over your password as part of getting a job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a part about submitting to administrative searches .
As in ; If you want to do into the courthouse they make you go though a metal detector and your stuff through the x-ray machine .
While this is a bit strange that it is to to be self reported ( but they can only on check what you tell them - for the most part ) .
It is searching you via self-reported background information .
They have every right to check what you are into in order for you to get the job .
For now I am ignoring the whole password part , that is crazy talk .
And there is no way a court rule in favor of making you hand over your password as part of getting a job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a part about submitting to administrative searches.
As in; If you want to do into the courthouse they make you go though a metal detector and your stuff through the x-ray machine.
While this is a bit strange that it is to to be self reported (but they can only on check what you tell them - for the most part).
It is searching you via self-reported background information.
They have every right to check what you are into in order for you to get the job.
For now I am ignoring the whole password part, that is crazy talk.
And there is no way a court rule in favor of making you hand over your password as part of getting a job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379251</id>
	<title>Is this illigale?</title>
	<author>Tybalt\_Capulet</author>
	<datestamp>1245358080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't this violate the Bill of Rights? Particularly the thing about 'privacy'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't this violate the Bill of Rights ?
Particularly the thing about 'privacy ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't this violate the Bill of Rights?
Particularly the thing about 'privacy'?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378271</id>
	<title>Re:My Klingon Keyboard</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1245355260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HR manager: "I'm trying to find this 'Klingonia' on the map, is that enywhere near Yugoslavia?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HR manager : " I 'm trying to find this 'Klingonia ' on the map , is that enywhere near Yugoslavia ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HR manager: "I'm trying to find this 'Klingonia' on the map, is that enywhere near Yugoslavia?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380957</id>
	<title>I would freely give my personal info</title>
	<author>ArcadeX</author>
	<datestamp>1245320820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd use all three lines to right down my waist size, inseam, how long my penis is, that i'm not circumsized, my religon, what type of food i like, how often I date, number of serious relationships, etc, and if they confront me about providing the wrong info, hey, invasion is invasion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd use all three lines to right down my waist size , inseam , how long my penis is , that i 'm not circumsized , my religon , what type of food i like , how often I date , number of serious relationships , etc , and if they confront me about providing the wrong info , hey , invasion is invasion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd use all three lines to right down my waist size, inseam, how long my penis is, that i'm not circumsized, my religon, what type of food i like, how often I date, number of serious relationships, etc, and if they confront me about providing the wrong info, hey, invasion is invasion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351</id>
	<title>What counts as business?</title>
	<author>orrigami</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do the user names and passwords to Banking Sites count as Business Accounts?  Mortgage Accounts, e-trade accounts?  Crazy Bozeman, MO city HR people.  HR should stick with paper hats and cake.  It is the only thing they are good at.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the user names and passwords to Banking Sites count as Business Accounts ?
Mortgage Accounts , e-trade accounts ?
Crazy Bozeman , MO city HR people .
HR should stick with paper hats and cake .
It is the only thing they are good at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the user names and passwords to Banking Sites count as Business Accounts?
Mortgage Accounts, e-trade accounts?
Crazy Bozeman, MO city HR people.
HR should stick with paper hats and cake.
It is the only thing they are good at.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392473</id>
	<title>Re:What counts as business?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1245437160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use part of my web hosting as a "personal networking stuff" site. According to this, I'd be required to give over access to that -- essentially, handing over the tools to hack my site. Aside from all the repercussions against the City of Bozeman, this could put me in jeopardy of being prosecuted for complicity in a hacking scheme, should some netwit prosecutor decide it looks like a good case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use part of my web hosting as a " personal networking stuff " site .
According to this , I 'd be required to give over access to that -- essentially , handing over the tools to hack my site .
Aside from all the repercussions against the City of Bozeman , this could put me in jeopardy of being prosecuted for complicity in a hacking scheme , should some netwit prosecutor decide it looks like a good case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use part of my web hosting as a "personal networking stuff" site.
According to this, I'd be required to give over access to that -- essentially, handing over the tools to hack my site.
Aside from all the repercussions against the City of Bozeman, this could put me in jeopardy of being prosecuted for complicity in a hacking scheme, should some netwit prosecutor decide it looks like a good case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380037</id>
	<title>Re:Past experience - healthcare records</title>
	<author>Kozz</author>
	<datestamp>1245317340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My wife used to work for a large insurance company which shall not be named.  At one point she told me she'd handled paperwork [legitimately] for a certain rockstar (now past his prime) who was very expensive to insure because of his heavy past cocaine abuse.  (We're shocked -- just SHOCKED!)

I suppose my point is how stupid it is to go seeking this celeb information.  You may learn few things except what's a) already public knowledge, or b) easily guessed.  And then you get prosecuted (or fired, if you're lucky) for digging.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife used to work for a large insurance company which shall not be named .
At one point she told me she 'd handled paperwork [ legitimately ] for a certain rockstar ( now past his prime ) who was very expensive to insure because of his heavy past cocaine abuse .
( We 're shocked -- just SHOCKED !
) I suppose my point is how stupid it is to go seeking this celeb information .
You may learn few things except what 's a ) already public knowledge , or b ) easily guessed .
And then you get prosecuted ( or fired , if you 're lucky ) for digging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife used to work for a large insurance company which shall not be named.
At one point she told me she'd handled paperwork [legitimately] for a certain rockstar (now past his prime) who was very expensive to insure because of his heavy past cocaine abuse.
(We're shocked -- just SHOCKED!
)

I suppose my point is how stupid it is to go seeking this celeb information.
You may learn few things except what's a) already public knowledge, or b) easily guessed.
And then you get prosecuted (or fired, if you're lucky) for digging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379097</id>
	<title>Re:Worst Policy EVAR!!! EVER EVEN!!!!</title>
	<author>BenFenner</author>
	<datestamp>1245357660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You'll get a <b> <i>total</i> of <i>two</i> </b> types, <b>liars</b> who give you nothing or <b>fakes</b>, <b>or idiots</b> you actually give you this info.</p></div><p>
So which type are you? Wait, don't tell me...
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I don't think that word means what you think it does.<br>
<br>
I'm not sure which you're confused on though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll get a total of two types , liars who give you nothing or fakes , or idiots you actually give you this info .
So which type are you ?
Wait , do n't tell me.. . I do n't think that word means what you think it does .
I 'm not sure which you 're confused on though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll get a  total of two  types, liars who give you nothing or fakes, or idiots you actually give you this info.
So which type are you?
Wait, don't tell me...





I don't think that word means what you think it does.
I'm not sure which you're confused on though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378751</id>
	<title>Only 3 lines?</title>
	<author>samcan</author>
	<datestamp>1245356580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only three lines? Let's see...</p><p>Bebo, Facebook, Slashdot, Gmail, Launchpad, Fedora Wiki, Archive.org, Twitter, Wikipedia, and Hotmail. *Whew*</p><p>I'd better write <em>really</em> small.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only three lines ?
Let 's see...Bebo , Facebook , Slashdot , Gmail , Launchpad , Fedora Wiki , Archive.org , Twitter , Wikipedia , and Hotmail .
* Whew * I 'd better write really small .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only three lines?
Let's see...Bebo, Facebook, Slashdot, Gmail, Launchpad, Fedora Wiki, Archive.org, Twitter, Wikipedia, and Hotmail.
*Whew*I'd better write really small.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384201</id>
	<title>Ban from public service.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1245336120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is what that kind of people initiating such bullshit should immediately be receiving. these people are running PUBLIC service, yet, totally inaffluent with what they are going to run. im sure that there are also services that this city runs over internet too. unbelievable. asking PASSWORDS. maybe even public service ban is too small a response.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is what that kind of people initiating such bullshit should immediately be receiving .
these people are running PUBLIC service , yet , totally inaffluent with what they are going to run .
im sure that there are also services that this city runs over internet too .
unbelievable. asking PASSWORDS .
maybe even public service ban is too small a response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is what that kind of people initiating such bullshit should immediately be receiving.
these people are running PUBLIC service, yet, totally inaffluent with what they are going to run.
im sure that there are also services that this city runs over internet too.
unbelievable. asking PASSWORDS.
maybe even public service ban is too small a response.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384929</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245341400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The form only contains 2 lines to list all the personal websites and web pages.</p><p>So they should suggest the candidates use www.tinyurl.com to fit in, along with passwords 8 characters or shorter (or reuse the same password or reset to one provided gracefully by the city e.g. 'B0z3Man').</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The form only contains 2 lines to list all the personal websites and web pages.So they should suggest the candidates use www.tinyurl.com to fit in , along with passwords 8 characters or shorter ( or reuse the same password or reset to one provided gracefully by the city e.g .
'B0z3Man ' ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The form only contains 2 lines to list all the personal websites and web pages.So they should suggest the candidates use www.tinyurl.com to fit in, along with passwords 8 characters or shorter (or reuse the same password or reset to one provided gracefully by the city e.g.
'B0z3Man').</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379959</id>
	<title>I use one username/password for every site:</title>
	<author>Kneht</author>
	<datestamp>1245317100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Username: fuckyou<br>
Password: andthehorseyourodeinon</htmltext>
<tokenext>Username : fuckyou Password : andthehorseyourodeinon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Username: fuckyou
Password: andthehorseyourodeinon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380773</id>
	<title>members</title>
	<author>Spaham</author>
	<datestamp>1245320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>common guys, they ask for the "member log-in" and password to member only websites you'd have owned,<br>not YOUR password to such sites.<br>They only want free pr0n passes, tis all<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>common guys , they ask for the " member log-in " and password to member only websites you 'd have owned,not YOUR password to such sites.They only want free pr0n passes , t is all : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>common guys, they ask for the "member log-in" and password to member only websites you'd have owned,not YOUR password to such sites.They only want free pr0n passes, tis all :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>dada21</author>
	<datestamp>1245354120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Queue anarcho-capitalist reply.</p><p>First, all government is force.  It uses force to do what it wants to do.  So far, no government has ever done what every voter has wanted them to do.  Ever.  Have you read laws that enable "government agents" to work on your behalf?  Ever?</p><p>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily.  They don't force you to make a decision against your will.</p><p>It's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force, or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools (by force), but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet, it's illegal?</p><p>More: <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/kinsella/kinsella15.html" title="lewrockwell.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/kinsella/kinsella15.html</a> [lewrockwell.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue anarcho-capitalist reply.First , all government is force .
It uses force to do what it wants to do .
So far , no government has ever done what every voter has wanted them to do .
Ever. Have you read laws that enable " government agents " to work on your behalf ?
Ever ? The private sector does EVERYTHING better , because it is done voluntarily .
They do n't force you to make a decision against your will.It 's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force , or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools ( by force ) , but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet , it 's illegal ? More : http : //www.lewrockwell.com/blog/kinsella/kinsella15.html [ lewrockwell.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue anarcho-capitalist reply.First, all government is force.
It uses force to do what it wants to do.
So far, no government has ever done what every voter has wanted them to do.
Ever.  Have you read laws that enable "government agents" to work on your behalf?
Ever?The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily.
They don't force you to make a decision against your will.It's ok for 10 crooks in office to take your money by force, or tell you what you can do with your land or your body or your tools (by force), but if CmdrTaco and I decide to lift your wallet, it's illegal?More: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/kinsella/kinsella15.html [lewrockwell.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380783</id>
	<title>slfisher@gmail.com</title>
	<author>slfisher</author>
	<datestamp>1245320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did a story on this as well.

<a href="http://www.newwest.net/city/article/city\_of\_bozeman\_demands\_passwords\_from\_job\_applicants/C396/L396/" title="newwest.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.newwest.net/city/article/city\_of\_bozeman\_demands\_passwords\_from\_job\_applicants/C396/L396/</a> [newwest.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did a story on this as well .
http : //www.newwest.net/city/article/city \ _of \ _bozeman \ _demands \ _passwords \ _from \ _job \ _applicants/C396/L396/ [ newwest.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did a story on this as well.
http://www.newwest.net/city/article/city\_of\_bozeman\_demands\_passwords\_from\_job\_applicants/C396/L396/ [newwest.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380525</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245319140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um.... if that's all you can think to worry about, you probably needn't worry.</p><p>Do you really think the government is required to provide personal information from job applications in response to FOIA requests?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um.... if that 's all you can think to worry about , you probably need n't worry.Do you really think the government is required to provide personal information from job applications in response to FOIA requests ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.... if that's all you can think to worry about, you probably needn't worry.Do you really think the government is required to provide personal information from job applications in response to FOIA requests?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378707</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1245356460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can already get your bank information in the process of a background check in addition they can ask the IRS for your returns. Remember this is a government background check not a private business.</p><p>Depending on the security clearance you need above and beyond just the application you'd be suprised what they do and who they talk to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can already get your bank information in the process of a background check in addition they can ask the IRS for your returns .
Remember this is a government background check not a private business.Depending on the security clearance you need above and beyond just the application you 'd be suprised what they do and who they talk to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can already get your bank information in the process of a background check in addition they can ask the IRS for your returns.
Remember this is a government background check not a private business.Depending on the security clearance you need above and beyond just the application you'd be suprised what they do and who they talk to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383341</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245331020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fix your slashcode!</p><p>You removed the space between names and the words "on [date]". This is not a problem for logged in users, as there is an image already between these things, but for AC, it says "Anonymous Cowardon"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fix your slashcode ! You removed the space between names and the words " on [ date ] " .
This is not a problem for logged in users , as there is an image already between these things , but for AC , it says " Anonymous Cowardon " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fix your slashcode!You removed the space between names and the words "on [date]".
This is not a problem for logged in users, as there is an image already between these things, but for AC, it says "Anonymous Cowardon"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382547</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1245327960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been to Bozeman a couple of times - my father was raised there.  Some of the finest people I've ever met. They didn't strike me as the sort who would cave into this sort of nonsense.  I would be tremendously surprised if there wasn't a run on the local poultry farm for bulk feathers, and a few barrels of road tar went missing from the road depot. Either that or they'd politely shoot them for asking such personal questions.<p>Sure they're a bunch of old fashioned redneck loonies, but the people I remember tended to salute the "freedom" and "liberty" stripes of the flag and the "all your rights are belong to us" stripes not so much.  Advice?  Don't cross 'em.  And whoever drafted that silly-ass requirement might want to move away and change his name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been to Bozeman a couple of times - my father was raised there .
Some of the finest people I 've ever met .
They did n't strike me as the sort who would cave into this sort of nonsense .
I would be tremendously surprised if there was n't a run on the local poultry farm for bulk feathers , and a few barrels of road tar went missing from the road depot .
Either that or they 'd politely shoot them for asking such personal questions.Sure they 're a bunch of old fashioned redneck loonies , but the people I remember tended to salute the " freedom " and " liberty " stripes of the flag and the " all your rights are belong to us " stripes not so much .
Advice ? Do n't cross 'em .
And whoever drafted that silly-ass requirement might want to move away and change his name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been to Bozeman a couple of times - my father was raised there.
Some of the finest people I've ever met.
They didn't strike me as the sort who would cave into this sort of nonsense.
I would be tremendously surprised if there wasn't a run on the local poultry farm for bulk feathers, and a few barrels of road tar went missing from the road depot.
Either that or they'd politely shoot them for asking such personal questions.Sure they're a bunch of old fashioned redneck loonies, but the people I remember tended to salute the "freedom" and "liberty" stripes of the flag and the "all your rights are belong to us" stripes not so much.
Advice?  Don't cross 'em.
And whoever drafted that silly-ass requirement might want to move away and change his name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384249</id>
	<title>Privileged accounts?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245336360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, they would fire me for NOT telling them about my account with the divorce lawyer, giving them the login and password? That would be fun, too bad I owe the lawyer everything the ex didn't take and can't afford to sue the bastards!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , they would fire me for NOT telling them about my account with the divorce lawyer , giving them the login and password ?
That would be fun , too bad I owe the lawyer everything the ex did n't take and ca n't afford to sue the bastards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, they would fire me for NOT telling them about my account with the divorce lawyer, giving them the login and password?
That would be fun, too bad I owe the lawyer everything the ex didn't take and can't afford to sue the bastards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377799</id>
	<title>just give them a link to the url that has</title>
	<author>TheGratefulNet</author>
	<datestamp>1245354180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that nasty image of:</p><p>"two applicants, one job"</p><p>or, something like that.  I might have gotton some of the words wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that nasty image of : " two applicants , one job " or , something like that .
I might have gotton some of the words wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that nasty image of:"two applicants, one job"or, something like that.
I might have gotton some of the words wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379875</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>dhermann</author>
	<datestamp>1245316800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me get this straight... you want me to hire a corporate entity to oversee the law and order of my community, authorize their employees to arm themselves and potentially use lethal force with internal oversight only, and let the free market make fiscal corrections based on their performance?</p><p>And then, on top of that, you want me to allow their agents to use force preemptively to prevent property damage loss, in order to reduce collective insurance premiums?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me get this straight... you want me to hire a corporate entity to oversee the law and order of my community , authorize their employees to arm themselves and potentially use lethal force with internal oversight only , and let the free market make fiscal corrections based on their performance ? And then , on top of that , you want me to allow their agents to use force preemptively to prevent property damage loss , in order to reduce collective insurance premiums ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me get this straight... you want me to hire a corporate entity to oversee the law and order of my community, authorize their employees to arm themselves and potentially use lethal force with internal oversight only, and let the free market make fiscal corrections based on their performance?And then, on top of that, you want me to allow their agents to use force preemptively to prevent property damage loss, in order to reduce collective insurance premiums?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378413</id>
	<title>Re:They really understand what they are asking for</title>
	<author>Wowlapalooza</author>
	<datestamp>1245355680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services?
I'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.</p></div><p>Ah, but let's follow this to its logical conclusion. Violating the ToS of an Internet website is now a federal crime (don't believe me? See <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/30/2014248&amp;tid=123" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/30/2014248&amp;tid=123</a> [slashdot.org]), so they're urging you to commit a federal crime. That's conspiracy, my friend, and the federal slammer for them. Do that a few times, with a few other job applicants, the RICO statutes might apply. I hope Bozeman, Montana has a lot of money in their budget to defend against federal criminal indictments and charges...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services ?
I 'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.Ah , but let 's follow this to its logical conclusion .
Violating the ToS of an Internet website is now a federal crime ( do n't believe me ?
See http : //news.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 08/11/30/2014248&amp;tid = 123 [ slashdot.org ] ) , so they 're urging you to commit a federal crime .
That 's conspiracy , my friend , and the federal slammer for them .
Do that a few times , with a few other job applicants , the RICO statutes might apply .
I hope Bozeman , Montana has a lot of money in their budget to defend against federal criminal indictments and charges.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, they are offically asking to violate the Terms of Service of all of these services?
I'm sure that each one has a policy about not sharing login information for your personal accounts.Ah, but let's follow this to its logical conclusion.
Violating the ToS of an Internet website is now a federal crime (don't believe me?
See http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/30/2014248&amp;tid=123 [slashdot.org]), so they're urging you to commit a federal crime.
That's conspiracy, my friend, and the federal slammer for them.
Do that a few times, with a few other job applicants, the RICO statutes might apply.
I hope Bozeman, Montana has a lot of money in their budget to defend against federal criminal indictments and charges...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377645</id>
	<title>wait, Bozeman Montana...</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1245353760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that where the Vulcans landed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that where the Vulcans landed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that where the Vulcans landed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379805</id>
	<title>One word ILLEGAL</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1245316560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There in deep dodo. Requiring anything that might disclose that applicants age, race or other protected and prohibited information is a violation of federal law. (its illegal to ask for a drivers license until after someone's been hired)  What they are doing is absolutely illegal and should result in a large fine to the federal Gov and a nice class action settlement that will probably bankrupt the town. Its also illegal to do background checks on applicants for the same reason (once again you can't do it till there hired)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There in deep dodo .
Requiring anything that might disclose that applicants age , race or other protected and prohibited information is a violation of federal law .
( its illegal to ask for a drivers license until after someone 's been hired ) What they are doing is absolutely illegal and should result in a large fine to the federal Gov and a nice class action settlement that will probably bankrupt the town .
Its also illegal to do background checks on applicants for the same reason ( once again you ca n't do it till there hired )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There in deep dodo.
Requiring anything that might disclose that applicants age, race or other protected and prohibited information is a violation of federal law.
(its illegal to ask for a drivers license until after someone's been hired)  What they are doing is absolutely illegal and should result in a large fine to the federal Gov and a nice class action settlement that will probably bankrupt the town.
Its also illegal to do background checks on applicants for the same reason (once again you can't do it till there hired)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379123</id>
	<title>Morons In Montana</title>
	<author>Stumbles</author>
	<datestamp>1245357720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoever the city official is that decided they have the right to know personal passwords... for anything is a complete... fucking idiot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever the city official is that decided they have the right to know personal passwords... for anything is a complete... fucking idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever the city official is that decided they have the right to know personal passwords... for anything is a complete... fucking idiot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380273</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot Account</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245318060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd put Anonymous Coward, on slashdot, but I think that alone might be grounds for me not being hired.  They certainly would think that I was suffering from multiple personalities disorder...and a little Schizophrenia too (delusions of grandeur.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd put Anonymous Coward , on slashdot , but I think that alone might be grounds for me not being hired .
They certainly would think that I was suffering from multiple personalities disorder...and a little Schizophrenia too ( delusions of grandeur .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd put Anonymous Coward, on slashdot, but I think that alone might be grounds for me not being hired.
They certainly would think that I was suffering from multiple personalities disorder...and a little Schizophrenia too (delusions of grandeur.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383103</id>
	<title>Comments please?</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1245330000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many slashdotters bothered to register, so that they could leave comments?  Read my comment, just completed minutes ago: <a href="http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10551414" title="montanasnewsstation.com">http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10551414</a> [montanasnewsstation.com]</p><p>I suggest that you be mildly abusive toward Herr Sullivan's asinity, but don't go overboard, or comments will just be edited out.  Have fun, boys and girls!  BTW, I'm Paul, and my comment starts with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics phrase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many slashdotters bothered to register , so that they could leave comments ?
Read my comment , just completed minutes ago : http : //montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp ? S = 10551414 [ montanasnewsstation.com ] I suggest that you be mildly abusive toward Herr Sullivan 's asinity , but do n't go overboard , or comments will just be edited out .
Have fun , boys and girls !
BTW , I 'm Paul , and my comment starts with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics phrase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many slashdotters bothered to register, so that they could leave comments?
Read my comment, just completed minutes ago: http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10551414 [montanasnewsstation.com]I suggest that you be mildly abusive toward Herr Sullivan's asinity, but don't go overboard, or comments will just be edited out.
Have fun, boys and girls!
BTW, I'm Paul, and my comment starts with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics phrase.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379395</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>interval1066</author>
	<datestamp>1245358500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has anyone in your fair city raised privacy issues (I assume so) and the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of association (I actually don't hear about this being very much) and if so, what has been the response from the city on those questions. A well placed lawsuit could force the city to knock this shit off right quick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone in your fair city raised privacy issues ( I assume so ) and the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of association ( I actually do n't hear about this being very much ) and if so , what has been the response from the city on those questions .
A well placed lawsuit could force the city to knock this shit off right quick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone in your fair city raised privacy issues (I assume so) and the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of association (I actually don't hear about this being very much) and if so, what has been the response from the city on those questions.
A well placed lawsuit could force the city to knock this shit off right quick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378105</id>
	<title>Tax Dollars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tax Dollars At Work People!</p><p>And that tax money is now gaurantee people dumb enough to provide that information work in goverment.... ufda!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tax Dollars At Work People ! And that tax money is now gaurantee people dumb enough to provide that information work in goverment.... ufda !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tax Dollars At Work People!And that tax money is now gaurantee people dumb enough to provide that information work in goverment.... ufda!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383091</id>
	<title>Wait, how is this not *illegal*?</title>
	<author>Dagmar d'Surreal</author>
	<datestamp>1245329940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I don't get is how this slipped past their attorney without him realizing it actually constitutes a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.</p><p>Follow along with me carefully here...</p><p>The TOS of most of these sites only allows the individual to use their account for their own uses, and generally explicitly forbids sharing the account with anyone for any reason (barring the strange convolutions of minor-guardian relationships).  Doesn't matter what Bozeman puts on the form--it doesn't and can't change the existing agreement between the user and the social networking site.</p><p>Violating the TOS basically invalidates the account, meaning it's very much not okay for someone other than the actual account owner to use it.</p><p>That's absolutely using a set of authentication credentials to exceed ones access knowingly, because it doesn't matter *what* the girl from HR was doing in that Facebook account--it's not their account, the owner can't legally give it to them, and Facebook expressly prohibits anyone other than the account owner from using it.  This is rather explicitly illegal and has been for oh, about twenty years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is how this slipped past their attorney without him realizing it actually constitutes a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.Follow along with me carefully here...The TOS of most of these sites only allows the individual to use their account for their own uses , and generally explicitly forbids sharing the account with anyone for any reason ( barring the strange convolutions of minor-guardian relationships ) .
Does n't matter what Bozeman puts on the form--it does n't and ca n't change the existing agreement between the user and the social networking site.Violating the TOS basically invalidates the account , meaning it 's very much not okay for someone other than the actual account owner to use it.That 's absolutely using a set of authentication credentials to exceed ones access knowingly , because it does n't matter * what * the girl from HR was doing in that Facebook account--it 's not their account , the owner ca n't legally give it to them , and Facebook expressly prohibits anyone other than the account owner from using it .
This is rather explicitly illegal and has been for oh , about twenty years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is how this slipped past their attorney without him realizing it actually constitutes a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.Follow along with me carefully here...The TOS of most of these sites only allows the individual to use their account for their own uses, and generally explicitly forbids sharing the account with anyone for any reason (barring the strange convolutions of minor-guardian relationships).
Doesn't matter what Bozeman puts on the form--it doesn't and can't change the existing agreement between the user and the social networking site.Violating the TOS basically invalidates the account, meaning it's very much not okay for someone other than the actual account owner to use it.That's absolutely using a set of authentication credentials to exceed ones access knowingly, because it doesn't matter *what* the girl from HR was doing in that Facebook account--it's not their account, the owner can't legally give it to them, and Facebook expressly prohibits anyone other than the account owner from using it.
This is rather explicitly illegal and has been for oh, about twenty years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377873</id>
	<title>Write down my password?</title>
	<author>fuentes</author>
	<datestamp>1245354300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heck, I'd have trouble *writing* some of my passwords.  My really complex ones are purely by finger/type memory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I 'd have trouble * writing * some of my passwords .
My really complex ones are purely by finger/type memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I'd have trouble *writing* some of my passwords.
My really complex ones are purely by finger/type memory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>iamhigh</author>
	<datestamp>1245354660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily. They don't force you to make a decision against your will.</p></div><p>WRONG!  The private sector does not do things well when it requires massive integration and cooperation among many different groups to make a decent solution.  Roads are the easiest example.  Could you really imagine privately constructed, maintained and designed roads?  One block this way, the next a different way.  Would the private police and fire not do their job if you hadn't paid them?  Isn't that covered under RICO?<br> <br>
Look, I'm all about free market, but to say everything is better in the private sector is just about as dumb as any other blanket statement (including this one).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better , because it is done voluntarily .
They do n't force you to make a decision against your will.WRONG !
The private sector does not do things well when it requires massive integration and cooperation among many different groups to make a decent solution .
Roads are the easiest example .
Could you really imagine privately constructed , maintained and designed roads ?
One block this way , the next a different way .
Would the private police and fire not do their job if you had n't paid them ?
Is n't that covered under RICO ?
Look , I 'm all about free market , but to say everything is better in the private sector is just about as dumb as any other blanket statement ( including this one ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The private sector does EVERYTHING better, because it is done voluntarily.
They don't force you to make a decision against your will.WRONG!
The private sector does not do things well when it requires massive integration and cooperation among many different groups to make a decent solution.
Roads are the easiest example.
Could you really imagine privately constructed, maintained and designed roads?
One block this way, the next a different way.
Would the private police and fire not do their job if you hadn't paid them?
Isn't that covered under RICO?
Look, I'm all about free market, but to say everything is better in the private sector is just about as dumb as any other blanket statement (including this one).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380623</id>
	<title>I made a contact in Bozeman</title>
	<author>HikingStick</author>
	<datestamp>1245319500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I made a contact in Bozeman, and she's forwarding my insights directly to the city attorney's office.  My thoughts?<br> <br>
1) Requesting the logon IDs and passwords is likely asking them to violate the ToS or EULA of the site or service.  Most sites have restrictions against sharing logon information. Therefore, they're basically asking potential employees to breach a contract.<br> <br>
2) You would never want to hire someone who would hand over user IDs and passwords to a third party, otherwise you'll have employees who will gladly turn over city/employee logon information to every social engineer out there.<br> <br>Honestly, I was surprised when I got a reply back indicating she would forward the information on.  She was unaware of the new policy, and was thankful that I brought it to her attention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I made a contact in Bozeman , and she 's forwarding my insights directly to the city attorney 's office .
My thoughts ?
1 ) Requesting the logon IDs and passwords is likely asking them to violate the ToS or EULA of the site or service .
Most sites have restrictions against sharing logon information .
Therefore , they 're basically asking potential employees to breach a contract .
2 ) You would never want to hire someone who would hand over user IDs and passwords to a third party , otherwise you 'll have employees who will gladly turn over city/employee logon information to every social engineer out there .
Honestly , I was surprised when I got a reply back indicating she would forward the information on .
She was unaware of the new policy , and was thankful that I brought it to her attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I made a contact in Bozeman, and she's forwarding my insights directly to the city attorney's office.
My thoughts?
1) Requesting the logon IDs and passwords is likely asking them to violate the ToS or EULA of the site or service.
Most sites have restrictions against sharing logon information.
Therefore, they're basically asking potential employees to breach a contract.
2) You would never want to hire someone who would hand over user IDs and passwords to a third party, otherwise you'll have employees who will gladly turn over city/employee logon information to every social engineer out there.
Honestly, I was surprised when I got a reply back indicating she would forward the information on.
She was unaware of the new policy, and was thankful that I brought it to her attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378083</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245354840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your password to MontanaFuckingSucks1 and see what happens</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your password to MontanaFuckingSucks1 and see what happens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your password to MontanaFuckingSucks1 and see what happens</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386819</id>
	<title>Re:Teach Your Children Well</title>
	<author>White Flame</author>
	<datestamp>1245404940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will do, Roy Brander, Sr. Infrastructure Engineer -- Calgary Water Resources</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will do , Roy Brander , Sr. Infrastructure Engineer -- Calgary Water Resources</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will do, Roy Brander, Sr. Infrastructure Engineer -- Calgary Water Resources</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386269</id>
	<title>Low Slashdot UID</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1245441960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The city of Bozeman wants a 4-digit Slashdot UID, and they want it NOW &#226;"&#194;even if they have to steal it from a job applicant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The city of Bozeman wants a 4-digit Slashdot UID , and they want it NOW   "   even if they have to steal it from a job applicant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The city of Bozeman wants a 4-digit Slashdot UID, and they want it NOW â"Âeven if they have to steal it from a job applicant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377507</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>HaZardman27</author>
	<datestamp>1245353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to live in Bozeman; that's far from the only thing that sucks about that place.  Worst drivers I've ever been around, and all the land is owned by the upper-class, so the middle-class is forced to live in apartment complexes and trailer parks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to live in Bozeman ; that 's far from the only thing that sucks about that place .
Worst drivers I 've ever been around , and all the land is owned by the upper-class , so the middle-class is forced to live in apartment complexes and trailer parks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to live in Bozeman; that's far from the only thing that sucks about that place.
Worst drivers I've ever been around, and all the land is owned by the upper-class, so the middle-class is forced to live in apartment complexes and trailer parks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377471</id>
	<title>Slashdot Account</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>User: Anonymous Coward<br>
Password:FAH-Q</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>User : Anonymous Coward Password : FAH-Q</tokentext>
<sentencetext>User: Anonymous Coward
Password:FAH-Q</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377401</id>
	<title>Simple answer: lie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the worst they can do? Sure they can try to tie you to an account, but that would involve money and time. If you put down nothing, the onus is on them to prove that you are telling the truth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the worst they can do ?
Sure they can try to tie you to an account , but that would involve money and time .
If you put down nothing , the onus is on them to prove that you are telling the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the worst they can do?
Sure they can try to tie you to an account, but that would involve money and time.
If you put down nothing, the onus is on them to prove that you are telling the truth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987</id>
	<title>Re:I call FUD</title>
	<author>YrWrstNtmr</author>
	<datestamp>1245354600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its on the <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/forms/Background\_Check\_Form\_MASTER.pdf" title="bozeman.net">Background check form</a> [bozeman.net].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its on the Background check form [ bozeman.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its on the Background check form [bozeman.net].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381441</id>
	<title>None.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245322800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't use passwords.<br>My accounts are locked via PKI and NO you cannot have my private cert because they protect data that isn't mine to share.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't use passwords.My accounts are locked via PKI and NO you can not have my private cert because they protect data that is n't mine to share .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't use passwords.My accounts are locked via PKI and NO you cannot have my private cert because they protect data that isn't mine to share.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378989</id>
	<title>My answer?  "You first!"</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1245357300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want me to trust you with all that personal information, then I think you need to ALSO provide that information about yourself to me.  I think they will find the obvious stupidity in their own reactions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want me to trust you with all that personal information , then I think you need to ALSO provide that information about yourself to me .
I think they will find the obvious stupidity in their own reactions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want me to trust you with all that personal information, then I think you need to ALSO provide that information about yourself to me.
I think they will find the obvious stupidity in their own reactions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28446337</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245755820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place. Much of police work is after the fact, yes, but some is definitively preventative as well.</i> </p><p>Presence??? That's a laugh. The Supreme Court has ruled that individual citizens have no right to sue policemen or police departments for failure "to protect and to serve".It's only a generic public right.</p><p>A cop actually has no legal obligation to intervene in a mugging. A department has no legal obligation to intervene when a restraining order is being violently violated.</p><p>Remember: When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place .
Much of police work is after the fact , yes , but some is definitively preventative as well .
Presence ? ? ? That 's a laugh .
The Supreme Court has ruled that individual citizens have no right to sue policemen or police departments for failure " to protect and to serve " .It 's only a generic public right.A cop actually has no legal obligation to intervene in a mugging .
A department has no legal obligation to intervene when a restraining order is being violently violated.Remember : When seconds count , the cops are only minutes away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if the public presence of police deters a crime from happening in the first place.
Much of police work is after the fact, yes, but some is definitively preventative as well.
Presence??? That's a laugh.
The Supreme Court has ruled that individual citizens have no right to sue policemen or police departments for failure "to protect and to serve".It's only a generic public right.A cop actually has no legal obligation to intervene in a mugging.
A department has no legal obligation to intervene when a restraining order is being violently violated.Remember: When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271</id>
	<title>Passwords?</title>
	<author>Iphtashu Fitz</author>
	<datestamp>1245352740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad I don't live in Montana...  I am absolutely shocked that they're requesting passwords.  I'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun doesn't shine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad I do n't live in Montana... I am absolutely shocked that they 're requesting passwords .
I 'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun does n't shine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad I don't live in Montana...  I am absolutely shocked that they're requesting passwords.
I'd tell them to go to hell and shove the application where the sun doesn't shine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007</id>
	<title>You know what to do</title>
	<author>stbill79</author>
	<datestamp>1245357420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I've just contacted the Montana ACLU <a href="http://www.aclumontana.org/index.php?option=com\_contact&amp;view=contact&amp;id=1\%3Acontact-us&amp;catid=4\%3Acontact-us&amp;Itemid=48" title="aclumontana.org" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [aclumontana.org]
</p><p>

The article links to a video interview with Greg Sullivan Bozeman City Attorney <a href="http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=10551414" title="montanasnewsstation.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [montanasnewsstation.com] (right side of page), who defends the policy.
</p><p>
His Contact info:
</p><p>
<i>
City Attorney
Greg Sullivan
gsullivan@bozeman.net
406-582-2309
</i>

</p><p>What I just emailed off to Mr. Sullivan</p><p>
Greg Sullivan
</p><p>
Your city's requirement for job applicants to provide a list of all personal internet memberships, logins, and passwords has recently come to my attention. I have just requested that the Montana ACLU investigate this policy as it seems a severe invasion of privacy. I have always appreciated the state of Montana's noble defense of the Constitution, exemplified with recent decisions by the state to support 2nd amendment rights. Your city's applicant policy is the exact opposite of what I'd expect from the state of Montana, and I would urge you to seriously reconsider this requirement.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've just contacted the Montana ACLU Here [ aclumontana.org ] The article links to a video interview with Greg Sullivan Bozeman City Attorney here [ montanasnewsstation.com ] ( right side of page ) , who defends the policy .
His Contact info : City Attorney Greg Sullivan gsullivan @ bozeman.net 406-582-2309 What I just emailed off to Mr. Sullivan Greg Sullivan Your city 's requirement for job applicants to provide a list of all personal internet memberships , logins , and passwords has recently come to my attention .
I have just requested that the Montana ACLU investigate this policy as it seems a severe invasion of privacy .
I have always appreciated the state of Montana 's noble defense of the Constitution , exemplified with recent decisions by the state to support 2nd amendment rights .
Your city 's applicant policy is the exact opposite of what I 'd expect from the state of Montana , and I would urge you to seriously reconsider this requirement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I've just contacted the Montana ACLU Here [aclumontana.org]


The article links to a video interview with Greg Sullivan Bozeman City Attorney here [montanasnewsstation.com] (right side of page), who defends the policy.
His Contact info:


City Attorney
Greg Sullivan
gsullivan@bozeman.net
406-582-2309


What I just emailed off to Mr. Sullivan
Greg Sullivan

Your city's requirement for job applicants to provide a list of all personal internet memberships, logins, and passwords has recently come to my attention.
I have just requested that the Montana ACLU investigate this policy as it seems a severe invasion of privacy.
I have always appreciated the state of Montana's noble defense of the Constitution, exemplified with recent decisions by the state to support 2nd amendment rights.
Your city's applicant policy is the exact opposite of what I'd expect from the state of Montana, and I would urge you to seriously reconsider this requirement.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378111</id>
	<title>They only want hires who don't use the internets</title>
	<author>flibbidyfloo</author>
	<datestamp>1245354960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's pretty obvious that they are looking for employees that don't waste their time on the internet logging into chat rooms and social networking sites.</p><p>Or liars. Maybe they are looking for lots and lots of liars. It is the government, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's pretty obvious that they are looking for employees that do n't waste their time on the internet logging into chat rooms and social networking sites.Or liars .
Maybe they are looking for lots and lots of liars .
It is the government , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's pretty obvious that they are looking for employees that don't waste their time on the internet logging into chat rooms and social networking sites.Or liars.
Maybe they are looking for lots and lots of liars.
It is the government, after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377689</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, pretty sure that's breaking the law</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1245353880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So everyone that has applied for that job, could sue the city for discrimination because the application form broke the law, and for all you know it was the information that you may or may not have supplied there that decided it?</p><p>Of course, has your point actually been pointed out to the nosy busybody middlemanager that thought this would be a good idea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So everyone that has applied for that job , could sue the city for discrimination because the application form broke the law , and for all you know it was the information that you may or may not have supplied there that decided it ? Of course , has your point actually been pointed out to the nosy busybody middlemanager that thought this would be a good idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So everyone that has applied for that job, could sue the city for discrimination because the application form broke the law, and for all you know it was the information that you may or may not have supplied there that decided it?Of course, has your point actually been pointed out to the nosy busybody middlemanager that thought this would be a good idea?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396987</id>
	<title>Calm down, everyone.</title>
	<author>Bozewoman</author>
	<datestamp>1245411780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're not asking for passwords anymore. As of an hour and 43 minutes ago, anyway.

<a href="http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/06/19/breaking\_news/70cityletter.txt" title="bozemandai...onicle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/06/19/breaking\_news/70cityletter.txt</a> [bozemandai...onicle.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not asking for passwords anymore .
As of an hour and 43 minutes ago , anyway .
http : //www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/06/19/breaking \ _news/70cityletter.txt [ bozemandai...onicle.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not asking for passwords anymore.
As of an hour and 43 minutes ago, anyway.
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/06/19/breaking\_news/70cityletter.txt [bozemandai...onicle.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380741</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>scot4875</author>
	<datestamp>1245319920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In an age when employers are held liable for everything, it's hard to blame them...</p></div></blockquote><p>Wait<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what?  The last two states I've worked in are both "Right to Work" states, which essentially means that my employer could fire me at any time for any (or no) reason.  In fact, it's better that they have no reason because then I couldn't sue for discrimination, if that were the case.  Sure, I get the right to quit at any time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but I already had that right to begin with.</p><p>So it's difficult for me to feel much sympathy for the "poor employers" when they already hold all the cards.</p><p>--Jeremy</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In an age when employers are held liable for everything , it 's hard to blame them...Wait ... what ? The last two states I 've worked in are both " Right to Work " states , which essentially means that my employer could fire me at any time for any ( or no ) reason .
In fact , it 's better that they have no reason because then I could n't sue for discrimination , if that were the case .
Sure , I get the right to quit at any time ... but I already had that right to begin with.So it 's difficult for me to feel much sympathy for the " poor employers " when they already hold all the cards.--Jeremy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In an age when employers are held liable for everything, it's hard to blame them...Wait ... what?  The last two states I've worked in are both "Right to Work" states, which essentially means that my employer could fire me at any time for any (or no) reason.
In fact, it's better that they have no reason because then I couldn't sue for discrimination, if that were the case.
Sure, I get the right to quit at any time ... but I already had that right to begin with.So it's difficult for me to feel much sympathy for the "poor employers" when they already hold all the cards.--Jeremy
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392217</id>
	<title>Re:You know what to do</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1245436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might also contact the Montana legislature (or if the session is out, whatever agency in Helena is taking names for future butt-kicking). Remember that Bozeman just tried to force an amendment to let them keep their redlight cameras in the face of new state law banning same... which indicates to me that Bozeman thinks it is above the law, and may be bordering on corruption. Bozeman may be just the example needed to demonstrate state privacy laws, or need for same.</p><p>[I grew up in MT, and used to live in Bozeman... the fact that it's becoming Bozangeles is probably a great deal of the problem.]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might also contact the Montana legislature ( or if the session is out , whatever agency in Helena is taking names for future butt-kicking ) .
Remember that Bozeman just tried to force an amendment to let them keep their redlight cameras in the face of new state law banning same... which indicates to me that Bozeman thinks it is above the law , and may be bordering on corruption .
Bozeman may be just the example needed to demonstrate state privacy laws , or need for same .
[ I grew up in MT , and used to live in Bozeman... the fact that it 's becoming Bozangeles is probably a great deal of the problem .
]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might also contact the Montana legislature (or if the session is out, whatever agency in Helena is taking names for future butt-kicking).
Remember that Bozeman just tried to force an amendment to let them keep their redlight cameras in the face of new state law banning same... which indicates to me that Bozeman thinks it is above the law, and may be bordering on corruption.
Bozeman may be just the example needed to demonstrate state privacy laws, or need for same.
[I grew up in MT, and used to live in Bozeman... the fact that it's becoming Bozangeles is probably a great deal of the problem.
]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378147</id>
	<title>Re:What else?</title>
	<author>cpotoso</author>
	<datestamp>1245355020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

This is SLASHDOT... I doubt you have a wife<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife ?
This is SLASHDOT... I doubt you have a wife : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe a beaver shot of my wife?
This is SLASHDOT... I doubt you have a wife :-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385939</id>
	<title>I Thought We Were Bad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245352380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn... Just when it looked like Billings was going to get to keep it's "Montana's Litigation Magnet" tiara for another year... Bozeman just has to try to out do us...</p><p>-J</p><p>http://policepay.blogspot.com/2009/01/billings-mt-police-officers-sue-city.html<br>http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/07/17/news/local/21-feuerstein.txt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn... Just when it looked like Billings was going to get to keep it 's " Montana 's Litigation Magnet " tiara for another year... Bozeman just has to try to out do us...-Jhttp : //policepay.blogspot.com/2009/01/billings-mt-police-officers-sue-city.htmlhttp : //www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/07/17/news/local/21-feuerstein.txt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn... Just when it looked like Billings was going to get to keep it's "Montana's Litigation Magnet" tiara for another year... Bozeman just has to try to out do us...-Jhttp://policepay.blogspot.com/2009/01/billings-mt-police-officers-sue-city.htmlhttp://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/07/17/news/local/21-feuerstein.txt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369</id>
	<title>Sorry, we are going to have to let you go.</title>
	<author>Tilzs</author>
	<datestamp>1245353040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has come to our attention that you lied or omitted information on your employment application. We have found out that you neglected to mention that you registered at creative.com 8 years ago to download some drivers and 3 years ago at dvorak.org/blog when you posted "get of my lawn".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has come to our attention that you lied or omitted information on your employment application .
We have found out that you neglected to mention that you registered at creative.com 8 years ago to download some drivers and 3 years ago at dvorak.org/blog when you posted " get of my lawn " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has come to our attention that you lied or omitted information on your employment application.
We have found out that you neglected to mention that you registered at creative.com 8 years ago to download some drivers and 3 years ago at dvorak.org/blog when you posted "get of my lawn".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378995</id>
	<title>Priceless typo "Green Card"="Greed Card"</title>
	<author>alextheseal</author>
	<datestamp>1245357360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Priceless typo on their page "Employment Process Policy"  <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/processPolicy.aspx" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/processPolicy.aspx</a> [bozeman.net], "Alien Registration Receipt Card (Greed Card)"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Priceless typo on their page " Employment Process Policy " http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/processPolicy.aspx [ bozeman.net ] , " Alien Registration Receipt Card ( Greed Card ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Priceless typo on their page "Employment Process Policy"  http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/processPolicy.aspx [bozeman.net], "Alien Registration Receipt Card (Greed Card)"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377627</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>e9th</author>
	<datestamp>1245353760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ad is actually for positions in their sister city, Bozeman, Nigeria.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ad is actually for positions in their sister city , Bozeman , Nigeria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ad is actually for positions in their sister city, Bozeman, Nigeria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381575</id>
	<title>Internet Usage Policy</title>
	<author>freakshowsam</author>
	<datestamp>1245323340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They have an equally idiotic internet usage policy...

<a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/employment" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/employment</a> [bozeman.net] policy/Admin\_\_Order\_IT\_Use\_Policy\_6\_2007.pdf</htmltext>
<tokenext>They have an equally idiotic internet usage policy.. . http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/employment [ bozeman.net ] policy/Admin \ _ \ _Order \ _IT \ _Use \ _Policy \ _6 \ _2007.pdf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have an equally idiotic internet usage policy...

http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/employment [bozeman.net] policy/Admin\_\_Order\_IT\_Use\_Policy\_6\_2007.pdf</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377379</id>
	<title>Bank accounts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully banks do not have any forums or chat rooms on their pages.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully banks do not have any forums or chat rooms on their pages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully banks do not have any forums or chat rooms on their pages.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380583</id>
	<title>Re:City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Jawn98685</author>
	<datestamp>1245319320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are  volunteer fire departments that are indeed 100\% private, and which survive on donations or "subscriptions", but those are <i>extremely</i> rare. So rare are they, that I would bet money that the parent is  mistaken about the exact nature of his local VFD. But that's neither here nor there. The "efficiency" of a fire department is a slippery term indeed. If nothing burns  in my community with an assessed valuation of 650 million dollars, is my fire department more efficient than the one that let 100 million dollars of property burn in a city with an assessed valuation of 6.5 billion? You get the idea. More to the point, simply comparing budgets is folly. I know of a few VFD's that despite extremely limited budgets, have an exemplary level of readiness and expertise. Their apparatus may be a decade or two old, and it might not shine like some, but it is well maintained and is wielded with the highest proficiency by a well trained group of dedicated men and women. Looking a little deeper, you notice that the crews' safety gear, turnouts, helmets, gloves, etc., is markedly newer in appearance. The hoses, nozzles, SCBA's, and hand tools obviously receive a disproportionate amount of attention (and probably funds).  Down the road might be another volunteer department. None of their vehicles are more than 10 years old. Their immaculate paint and extensive gold leaf work are kept spotless and shiny. And the crew are a bunch of undisciplined laggards, who spend more time applying wax, playing pool and drinking beer than they do training with and maintaining the tools that will actually stand between them and the flame. Which department do you want protecting you? Does it matter where their funds come from?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are volunteer fire departments that are indeed 100 \ % private , and which survive on donations or " subscriptions " , but those are extremely rare .
So rare are they , that I would bet money that the parent is mistaken about the exact nature of his local VFD .
But that 's neither here nor there .
The " efficiency " of a fire department is a slippery term indeed .
If nothing burns in my community with an assessed valuation of 650 million dollars , is my fire department more efficient than the one that let 100 million dollars of property burn in a city with an assessed valuation of 6.5 billion ?
You get the idea .
More to the point , simply comparing budgets is folly .
I know of a few VFD 's that despite extremely limited budgets , have an exemplary level of readiness and expertise .
Their apparatus may be a decade or two old , and it might not shine like some , but it is well maintained and is wielded with the highest proficiency by a well trained group of dedicated men and women .
Looking a little deeper , you notice that the crews ' safety gear , turnouts , helmets , gloves , etc. , is markedly newer in appearance .
The hoses , nozzles , SCBA 's , and hand tools obviously receive a disproportionate amount of attention ( and probably funds ) .
Down the road might be another volunteer department .
None of their vehicles are more than 10 years old .
Their immaculate paint and extensive gold leaf work are kept spotless and shiny .
And the crew are a bunch of undisciplined laggards , who spend more time applying wax , playing pool and drinking beer than they do training with and maintaining the tools that will actually stand between them and the flame .
Which department do you want protecting you ?
Does it matter where their funds come from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are  volunteer fire departments that are indeed 100\% private, and which survive on donations or "subscriptions", but those are extremely rare.
So rare are they, that I would bet money that the parent is  mistaken about the exact nature of his local VFD.
But that's neither here nor there.
The "efficiency" of a fire department is a slippery term indeed.
If nothing burns  in my community with an assessed valuation of 650 million dollars, is my fire department more efficient than the one that let 100 million dollars of property burn in a city with an assessed valuation of 6.5 billion?
You get the idea.
More to the point, simply comparing budgets is folly.
I know of a few VFD's that despite extremely limited budgets, have an exemplary level of readiness and expertise.
Their apparatus may be a decade or two old, and it might not shine like some, but it is well maintained and is wielded with the highest proficiency by a well trained group of dedicated men and women.
Looking a little deeper, you notice that the crews' safety gear, turnouts, helmets, gloves, etc., is markedly newer in appearance.
The hoses, nozzles, SCBA's, and hand tools obviously receive a disproportionate amount of attention (and probably funds).
Down the road might be another volunteer department.
None of their vehicles are more than 10 years old.
Their immaculate paint and extensive gold leaf work are kept spotless and shiny.
And the crew are a bunch of undisciplined laggards, who spend more time applying wax, playing pool and drinking beer than they do training with and maintaining the tools that will actually stand between them and the flame.
Which department do you want protecting you?
Does it matter where their funds come from?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386467</id>
	<title>Email them!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245443700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So everyone should email them and let them know how asking for account credentials is incredibly ignorant and probably illegal.  Try the two HR people, <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/contacts.aspx" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/contacts.aspx</a> [bozeman.net] and lawyers <a href="http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/Default.aspx" title="bozeman.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/Default.aspx</a> [bozeman.net] .  Perhaps also cc the news site that is covering this: <a href="http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=1740803&amp;nav=menu227\_1\_3\_7" title="montanasnewsstation.com" rel="nofollow">http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=1740803&amp;nav=menu227\_1\_3\_7</a> [montanasnewsstation.com] .  They either need to be educated or shamed into realizing that this is way out of line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So everyone should email them and let them know how asking for account credentials is incredibly ignorant and probably illegal .
Try the two HR people , http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/contacts.aspx [ bozeman.net ] and lawyers http : //www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/Default.aspx [ bozeman.net ] .
Perhaps also cc the news site that is covering this : http : //montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp ? S = 1740803&amp;nav = menu227 \ _1 \ _3 \ _7 [ montanasnewsstation.com ] .
They either need to be educated or shamed into realizing that this is way out of line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So everyone should email them and let them know how asking for account credentials is incredibly ignorant and probably illegal.
Try the two HR people, http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/humanResource/contacts.aspx [bozeman.net] and lawyers http://www.bozeman.net/bozeman/legal/Default.aspx [bozeman.net] .
Perhaps also cc the news site that is covering this: http://montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=1740803&amp;nav=menu227\_1\_3\_7 [montanasnewsstation.com] .
They either need to be educated or shamed into realizing that this is way out of line.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379443</id>
	<title>Re:They really understand what they are asking for</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1245358680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What's next, asking for your login for your banking information, so they can see how you spend your personal money?</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't get your panties in a twist, that information is already available for a couple of dollars online to anyone.</p><p>No, the next logical step is to ask for all your email account and password account information. It's pretty obvious they're asking for passwords because you've had the gall to make your facebook page private, and you've had the gall to communicate with your family and friends privately. And private communications between individuals, that sounds like some kind of communist idea! I certainly don't think the people of Montana are ready for this kind of responsibility. Think of the resulting anarchy that will almost certainly ensue. Think of the children for Christ's sake! </p><p>Also, the people who give you their password, at least you know they're going to be loyal to you. It's an ultimate act of surrender. It's just like the <a href="http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/background/story/529275.html" title="adn.com">resignation letters</a> [adn.com] Sarah Palin asked city employees to sign as a form of loyalty test. She only tried firing the people who wouldn't sign it, the people who did sign -- they had nothing to worry about.   </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's next , asking for your login for your banking information , so they can see how you spend your personal money ? Do n't get your panties in a twist , that information is already available for a couple of dollars online to anyone.No , the next logical step is to ask for all your email account and password account information .
It 's pretty obvious they 're asking for passwords because you 've had the gall to make your facebook page private , and you 've had the gall to communicate with your family and friends privately .
And private communications between individuals , that sounds like some kind of communist idea !
I certainly do n't think the people of Montana are ready for this kind of responsibility .
Think of the resulting anarchy that will almost certainly ensue .
Think of the children for Christ 's sake !
Also , the people who give you their password , at least you know they 're going to be loyal to you .
It 's an ultimate act of surrender .
It 's just like the resignation letters [ adn.com ] Sarah Palin asked city employees to sign as a form of loyalty test .
She only tried firing the people who would n't sign it , the people who did sign -- they had nothing to worry about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's next, asking for your login for your banking information, so they can see how you spend your personal money?Don't get your panties in a twist, that information is already available for a couple of dollars online to anyone.No, the next logical step is to ask for all your email account and password account information.
It's pretty obvious they're asking for passwords because you've had the gall to make your facebook page private, and you've had the gall to communicate with your family and friends privately.
And private communications between individuals, that sounds like some kind of communist idea!
I certainly don't think the people of Montana are ready for this kind of responsibility.
Think of the resulting anarchy that will almost certainly ensue.
Think of the children for Christ's sake!
Also, the people who give you their password, at least you know they're going to be loyal to you.
It's an ultimate act of surrender.
It's just like the resignation letters [adn.com] Sarah Palin asked city employees to sign as a form of loyalty test.
She only tried firing the people who wouldn't sign it, the people who did sign -- they had nothing to worry about.   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377763</id>
	<title>Re:They really understand what they are asking for</title>
	<author>gujo-odori</author>
	<datestamp>1245354120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Judging by TFA, it was apparently vetted by their city attorney. Maybe even written by him.</p><p>Oh, wait. Anyone with a clue. Never mind. Nothing to see here, folks. Move along, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by TFA , it was apparently vetted by their city attorney .
Maybe even written by him.Oh , wait .
Anyone with a clue .
Never mind .
Nothing to see here , folks .
Move along , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by TFA, it was apparently vetted by their city attorney.
Maybe even written by him.Oh, wait.
Anyone with a clue.
Never mind.
Nothing to see here, folks.
Move along, move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479</id>
	<title>City jobs are a bad thing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245353340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there any level at which collective action (otherwise known as 'government') is a good thing? What is wrong with city jobs? Would you have the private sector take over all functions of government, on all levels? I would think, at the very least you would be in favor of a public police force to protect your property. No matter how many guns you have, someone has more, and is more willing to use them than you are. Fire departments are nice, too. As are public roads. In fact, I can't think of many things that city governments currently do that the private sector could do better. The private sector exists to give you as little value for your dollar as you can be convinced to accept. The government is an agent working on your behalf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any level at which collective action ( otherwise known as 'government ' ) is a good thing ?
What is wrong with city jobs ?
Would you have the private sector take over all functions of government , on all levels ?
I would think , at the very least you would be in favor of a public police force to protect your property .
No matter how many guns you have , someone has more , and is more willing to use them than you are .
Fire departments are nice , too .
As are public roads .
In fact , I ca n't think of many things that city governments currently do that the private sector could do better .
The private sector exists to give you as little value for your dollar as you can be convinced to accept .
The government is an agent working on your behalf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any level at which collective action (otherwise known as 'government') is a good thing?
What is wrong with city jobs?
Would you have the private sector take over all functions of government, on all levels?
I would think, at the very least you would be in favor of a public police force to protect your property.
No matter how many guns you have, someone has more, and is more willing to use them than you are.
Fire departments are nice, too.
As are public roads.
In fact, I can't think of many things that city governments currently do that the private sector could do better.
The private sector exists to give you as little value for your dollar as you can be convinced to accept.
The government is an agent working on your behalf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378281</id>
	<title>Re:Biased towards people who violate rules</title>
	<author>Zarhan</author>
	<datestamp>1245355320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting is that Facebook, linkedin and whatnot ask you to give them your hotmail/gmail/etc account info so they could import your contacts...Not sure if these mail services have similar TOS though, but google account is lot more than just mail, so is MS Live ID.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting is that Facebook , linkedin and whatnot ask you to give them your hotmail/gmail/etc account info so they could import your contacts...Not sure if these mail services have similar TOS though , but google account is lot more than just mail , so is MS Live ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting is that Facebook, linkedin and whatnot ask you to give them your hotmail/gmail/etc account info so they could import your contacts...Not sure if these mail services have similar TOS though, but google account is lot more than just mail, so is MS Live ID.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379299</id>
	<title>Re:Passwords?</title>
	<author>alzoron</author>
	<datestamp>1245358260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only would the applicants be breaking the terms of service but the City of Bozeman would be guilty of all the "Unlawful Access of a Computer" laws we have all over the place.  Since most of these online sites are hosted somewhere outside of Montana they would be guilty on a Federal level.  The City of Bozeman should be prepared for all the lawsuits they're about to receive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only would the applicants be breaking the terms of service but the City of Bozeman would be guilty of all the " Unlawful Access of a Computer " laws we have all over the place .
Since most of these online sites are hosted somewhere outside of Montana they would be guilty on a Federal level .
The City of Bozeman should be prepared for all the lawsuits they 're about to receive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only would the applicants be breaking the terms of service but the City of Bozeman would be guilty of all the "Unlawful Access of a Computer" laws we have all over the place.
Since most of these online sites are hosted somewhere outside of Montana they would be guilty on a Federal level.
The City of Bozeman should be prepared for all the lawsuits they're about to receive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383089</id>
	<title>Re:WTF</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1245329940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Or one could just ask them to write down all ATM card numbers, all Debit and Credit card numbers, expiration dates, and 'security code on the back', with secret PIN number to the right?
</p><p>
In the name of "background investigation" for applicant who may have money/accounting-related duties.
</p><p>
I'm afraid these days, people are naive enough to actually do it...
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or one could just ask them to write down all ATM card numbers , all Debit and Credit card numbers , expiration dates , and 'security code on the back ' , with secret PIN number to the right ?
In the name of " background investigation " for applicant who may have money/accounting-related duties .
I 'm afraid these days , people are naive enough to actually do it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Or one could just ask them to write down all ATM card numbers, all Debit and Credit card numbers, expiration dates, and 'security code on the back', with secret PIN number to the right?
In the name of "background investigation" for applicant who may have money/accounting-related duties.
I'm afraid these days, people are naive enough to actually do it...
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378051</id>
	<title>Re:wait, Bozeman Montana...</title>
	<author>Chaos Incarnate</author>
	<datestamp>1245354720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yup. It's also the hometown of Brannon Braga.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup .
It 's also the hometown of Brannon Braga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup.
It's also the hometown of Brannon Braga.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377645</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28390417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28395053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28402293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28446337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380495
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28387027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386495
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_18_1736257_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377501
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377519
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380705
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380037
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377483
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379299
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378023
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378811
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378153
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28387027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28395053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378281
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28402293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379497
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377811
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379605
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380233
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381767
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378709
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383387
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377983
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378197
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379507
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379335
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381977
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380525
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386193
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382547
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379395
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381295
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380495
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379389
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377987
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379815
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384379
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384929
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379153
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28385847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386495
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28384951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28395743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378443
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28389341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378413
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396663
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28396707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28391893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28390417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377977
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377479
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377789
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388095
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28382985
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378013
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379405
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392883
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28388601
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392315
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386987
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379783
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379141
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377795
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378067
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28393863
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379029
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381449
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386001
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379875
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381239
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386835
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379279
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378779
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28383995
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28386723
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28392141
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28446337
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381727
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28380583
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379437
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378887
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377399
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28378169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28381813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_18_1736257.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28377851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_18_1736257.28379659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
