<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_16_1556254</id>
	<title>NASA To Trigger Massive Explosion On the Moon In Search of Ice</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1245168780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"NASA is preparing to launch the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, which will fly a Centaur rocket booster into the moon, <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci\_12590357">triggering a six-mile-high explosion</a> that scientists hope will confirm whether water is frozen in the perpetual darkness of craters near the moon's south pole.  If the spacecraft launches on schedule at 12:51 p.m. Wednesday, it will hit the moon in the early morning hours of October 8 after an <a href="http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/targeting.htm">86-day Lunar Gravity-Assist, Lunar Return Orbit</a> that will allow the spacecraft time to complete its two-month commissioning phase and conduct nearly a month of science data collection of polar crater measurements before colliding with the moon just 10 minutes behind the Centaur."</i> (Continues, below.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " NASA is preparing to launch the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite , which will fly a Centaur rocket booster into the moon , triggering a six-mile-high explosion that scientists hope will confirm whether water is frozen in the perpetual darkness of craters near the moon 's south pole .
If the spacecraft launches on schedule at 12 : 51 p.m. Wednesday , it will hit the moon in the early morning hours of October 8 after an 86-day Lunar Gravity-Assist , Lunar Return Orbit that will allow the spacecraft time to complete its two-month commissioning phase and conduct nearly a month of science data collection of polar crater measurements before colliding with the moon just 10 minutes behind the Centaur .
" ( Continues , below .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "NASA is preparing to launch the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, which will fly a Centaur rocket booster into the moon, triggering a six-mile-high explosion that scientists hope will confirm whether water is frozen in the perpetual darkness of craters near the moon's south pole.
If the spacecraft launches on schedule at 12:51 p.m. Wednesday, it will hit the moon in the early morning hours of October 8 after an 86-day Lunar Gravity-Assist, Lunar Return Orbit that will allow the spacecraft time to complete its two-month commissioning phase and conduct nearly a month of science data collection of polar crater measurements before colliding with the moon just 10 minutes behind the Centaur.
" (Continues, below.
)</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351297</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder ...</title>
	<author>zifferent</author>
	<datestamp>1245180960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust, how long will it take for dust to settle? </i><br>Gravitational acceleration on the moon is 1.6 m/s2, and the dust is going up roughly 10 km. At the dust's apogee the dust's velocity is zero. It will take almost two minutes for the dust to settle</p><p><i>Will dust escape out of the lunar surface into space?</i><br>Yes, undoubtedly. Dust will be flung off the surface of the moon and into space. It will then proceed to fall back towards the moon. If it's going fast enough and at an steep enough angle it might go into orbit, but more than likely fall back to the moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust , how long will it take for dust to settle ?
Gravitational acceleration on the moon is 1.6 m/s2 , and the dust is going up roughly 10 km .
At the dust 's apogee the dust 's velocity is zero .
It will take almost two minutes for the dust to settleWill dust escape out of the lunar surface into space ? Yes , undoubtedly .
Dust will be flung off the surface of the moon and into space .
It will then proceed to fall back towards the moon .
If it 's going fast enough and at an steep enough angle it might go into orbit , but more than likely fall back to the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust, how long will it take for dust to settle?
Gravitational acceleration on the moon is 1.6 m/s2, and the dust is going up roughly 10 km.
At the dust's apogee the dust's velocity is zero.
It will take almost two minutes for the dust to settleWill dust escape out of the lunar surface into space?Yes, undoubtedly.
Dust will be flung off the surface of the moon and into space.
It will then proceed to fall back towards the moon.
If it's going fast enough and at an steep enough angle it might go into orbit, but more than likely fall back to the moon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>No2Gates</author>
	<datestamp>1245172680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon? There's plenty on this planet. I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in a financial crisis , and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon ?
There 's plenty on this planet .
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon?
There's plenty on this planet.
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350055</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Knuckler</author>
	<datestamp>1245176640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It isn't enough for us to destroy to the Earth. We have to destroy the moon, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't enough for us to destroy to the Earth .
We have to destroy the moon , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't enough for us to destroy to the Earth.
We have to destroy the moon, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353849</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245147600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much information do you have on this? and where are you getting your stats?</p><p>AFAIK: it COSTS about $1000 to take a gallon of water into space. most of the rest of the "money" is spent on the displaced cargo that you "could have been taking and making money on"</p><p>most of the cost is a set of licenses that are only deposits that go out for the removal of material from the earth. as long as the water comes back, they get most of the money back.</p><p>why do you think NASA dumps so much money into the recycling of urine? saves money all around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much information do you have on this ?
and where are you getting your stats ? AFAIK : it COSTS about $ 1000 to take a gallon of water into space .
most of the rest of the " money " is spent on the displaced cargo that you " could have been taking and making money on " most of the cost is a set of licenses that are only deposits that go out for the removal of material from the earth .
as long as the water comes back , they get most of the money back.why do you think NASA dumps so much money into the recycling of urine ?
saves money all around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much information do you have on this?
and where are you getting your stats?AFAIK: it COSTS about $1000 to take a gallon of water into space.
most of the rest of the "money" is spent on the displaced cargo that you "could have been taking and making money on"most of the cost is a set of licenses that are only deposits that go out for the removal of material from the earth.
as long as the water comes back, they get most of the money back.why do you think NASA dumps so much money into the recycling of urine?
saves money all around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349909</id>
	<title>Cheap ploy</title>
	<author>hcdejong</author>
	<datestamp>1245176160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, the LCOSS is <i>intended</i> to crash, but I bet NASA will announce eventually that the probe missed, made a soft landing instead and is now sending data from the surface. Way to lower expectations, guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , the LCOSS is intended to crash , but I bet NASA will announce eventually that the probe missed , made a soft landing instead and is now sending data from the surface .
Way to lower expectations , guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, the LCOSS is intended to crash, but I bet NASA will announce eventually that the probe missed, made a soft landing instead and is now sending data from the surface.
Way to lower expectations, guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349617</id>
	<title>Cue Ookla the Mok...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one look forward to our future of savagery, sorcery and super science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one look forward to our future of savagery , sorcery and super science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one look forward to our future of savagery, sorcery and super science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349491</id>
	<title>Well, there WAS ice!</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1245174840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(AP)  NASA announces that they have discovered that there were in fact trace amounts of ice on the moon.</p><p>"We detected a modest amount of water by blowing up a small part of the moon, but is not really sufficient to allow for future use."</p><p>Critics argue that NASA may have destroyed the precious lunar water, damaging the lunar system irreparably.</p><p>"They blew it up, I tell you.  This is a travesty.  It's all just testosterone, blowing things up. We thought we were changing away from this white male blowing up the moon business. Now, future life will not be able to evolve on the moon without water.", said the head of the leftist Environmental Action Front.</p><p>Other critics disagreed.  "Drill, baby, drill", argued the head of the Chamber of Christian Commerce.  "There's probably plenty more water on the moon.  NASA couldn't have blown it up. It's the moon for Pete's sake...besides, there's no such thing as evolution anyways... "</p><p>President Obama's press secretary forgot where he was for a moment, then blamed the launch of the space craft on George Bush.</p><p>Dick Cheney replied that blowing up part of the moon was for national security but regretted that there will not be sufficient water to waterboard alien terrorists with.</p><p>Aliens from Alpha Centauri expressed their outrage through their ambassadors at Area 51.  Ambassador Xwillxiahch told human reporters "First, you shot down our spaceship, after we showed you how to make pyramids, and now you do this.  You humans are far too aggressive. We could have told you that there was water on the moon".  Are you going to go killed the fish on Europa to see if they are there...oh, there's fish on Europa...didn't know that, did you HUMANS.."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( AP ) NASA announces that they have discovered that there were in fact trace amounts of ice on the moon .
" We detected a modest amount of water by blowing up a small part of the moon , but is not really sufficient to allow for future use .
" Critics argue that NASA may have destroyed the precious lunar water , damaging the lunar system irreparably .
" They blew it up , I tell you .
This is a travesty .
It 's all just testosterone , blowing things up .
We thought we were changing away from this white male blowing up the moon business .
Now , future life will not be able to evolve on the moon without water .
" , said the head of the leftist Environmental Action Front.Other critics disagreed .
" Drill , baby , drill " , argued the head of the Chamber of Christian Commerce .
" There 's probably plenty more water on the moon .
NASA could n't have blown it up .
It 's the moon for Pete 's sake...besides , there 's no such thing as evolution anyways... " President Obama 's press secretary forgot where he was for a moment , then blamed the launch of the space craft on George Bush.Dick Cheney replied that blowing up part of the moon was for national security but regretted that there will not be sufficient water to waterboard alien terrorists with.Aliens from Alpha Centauri expressed their outrage through their ambassadors at Area 51 .
Ambassador Xwillxiahch told human reporters " First , you shot down our spaceship , after we showed you how to make pyramids , and now you do this .
You humans are far too aggressive .
We could have told you that there was water on the moon " .
Are you going to go killed the fish on Europa to see if they are there...oh , there 's fish on Europa...did n't know that , did you HUMANS.. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(AP)  NASA announces that they have discovered that there were in fact trace amounts of ice on the moon.
"We detected a modest amount of water by blowing up a small part of the moon, but is not really sufficient to allow for future use.
"Critics argue that NASA may have destroyed the precious lunar water, damaging the lunar system irreparably.
"They blew it up, I tell you.
This is a travesty.
It's all just testosterone, blowing things up.
We thought we were changing away from this white male blowing up the moon business.
Now, future life will not be able to evolve on the moon without water.
", said the head of the leftist Environmental Action Front.Other critics disagreed.
"Drill, baby, drill", argued the head of the Chamber of Christian Commerce.
"There's probably plenty more water on the moon.
NASA couldn't have blown it up.
It's the moon for Pete's sake...besides, there's no such thing as evolution anyways... "President Obama's press secretary forgot where he was for a moment, then blamed the launch of the space craft on George Bush.Dick Cheney replied that blowing up part of the moon was for national security but regretted that there will not be sufficient water to waterboard alien terrorists with.Aliens from Alpha Centauri expressed their outrage through their ambassadors at Area 51.
Ambassador Xwillxiahch told human reporters "First, you shot down our spaceship, after we showed you how to make pyramids, and now you do this.
You humans are far too aggressive.
We could have told you that there was water on the moon".
Are you going to go killed the fish on Europa to see if they are there...oh, there's fish on Europa...didn't know that, did you HUMANS.."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351237</id>
	<title>Japan just did this last week</title>
	<author>Bretski</author>
	<datestamp>1245180720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do we really need to do it again?</p><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090610/sc\_space/japaneseprobetoslamintomoontoday" title="yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090610/sc\_space/japaneseprobetoslamintomoontoday</a> [yahoo.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we really need to do it again ? http : //news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090610/sc \ _space/japaneseprobetoslamintomoontoday [ yahoo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we really need to do it again?http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090610/sc\_space/japaneseprobetoslamintomoontoday [yahoo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351295</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245180960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was a great series. Only two season were produced, the first one is excellent while the second is total crap.<br>If only they dropped those awfully looking uniforms in both seasons that would have made it perfect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a great series .
Only two season were produced , the first one is excellent while the second is total crap.If only they dropped those awfully looking uniforms in both seasons that would have made it perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a great series.
Only two season were produced, the first one is excellent while the second is total crap.If only they dropped those awfully looking uniforms in both seasons that would have made it perfect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352511</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if they are -responsible- for the moon's current orbit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if they are -responsible- for the moon 's current orbit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if they are -responsible- for the moon's current orbit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349459</id>
	<title>Thundarr the Barbarian ring a bell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.thundarr.com/images/21.jpg" title="thundarr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thundarr.com/images/21.jpg</a> [thundarr.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.thundarr.com/images/21.jpg [ thundarr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.thundarr.com/images/21.jpg [thundarr.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349445</id>
	<title>Bad story description</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should have read "America declares war on the moon"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should have read " America declares war on the moon "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should have read "America declares war on the moon"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139</id>
	<title>I hope everyone is learning an important lesson</title>
	<author>monoqlith</author>
	<datestamp>1245173700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if "there is water there."</p><p>For instance, I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there.' It was moist, leading me to believe that there is, in fact, water in there. Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not, in fact, "water in there." As I suspected, there wasn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if " there is water there .
" For instance , I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there .
' It was moist , leading me to believe that there is , in fact , water in there .
Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not , in fact , " water in there .
" As I suspected , there was n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if "there is water there.
"For instance, I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there.
' It was moist, leading me to believe that there is, in fact, water in there.
Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not, in fact, "water in there.
" As I suspected, there wasn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349705</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1245175620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...</p></div><p>And the problem is...?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>SO , NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...And the problem is... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...And the problem is...?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835</id>
	<title>Shock and Awe...</title>
	<author>olsmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1245172740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD's on the moon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD 's on the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD's on the moon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349191</id>
	<title>Re:Queue all the anti-war nutjobs</title>
	<author>bcong</author>
	<datestamp>1245173880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well Ohio did call <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva,\_Ohio#Declaration\_of\_Lunar\_Ownership" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">dibs</a> [wikipedia.org] and they've got the <a href="http://www.geocities.com/moonsayles/geneva\_moon\_owner.jpg" title="geocities.com" rel="nofollow">documentation</a> [geocities.com] to prove it</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Ohio did call dibs [ wikipedia.org ] and they 've got the documentation [ geocities.com ] to prove it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Ohio did call dibs [wikipedia.org] and they've got the documentation [geocities.com] to prove it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351731</id>
	<title>Bumped</title>
	<author>Mike Rice</author>
	<datestamp>1245182400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I am not mistaken, this launch was 'bumped' to allow the shuttle to take off Wednesday morning, 2009-06-16 at about 5:40 hours US Eastern DST</p><p>The LCROSS is now scheduled to lift off on Thursday, 2009-06-18 at 17:12 hours US Eastern DST.</p><p>This has been in the news for like all day and most of last night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I am not mistaken , this launch was 'bumped ' to allow the shuttle to take off Wednesday morning , 2009-06-16 at about 5 : 40 hours US Eastern DSTThe LCROSS is now scheduled to lift off on Thursday , 2009-06-18 at 17 : 12 hours US Eastern DST.This has been in the news for like all day and most of last night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I am not mistaken, this launch was 'bumped' to allow the shuttle to take off Wednesday morning, 2009-06-16 at about 5:40 hours US Eastern DSTThe LCROSS is now scheduled to lift off on Thursday, 2009-06-18 at 17:12 hours US Eastern DST.This has been in the news for like all day and most of last night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349821</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>2gravey</author>
	<datestamp>1245175920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've often wondered why Mythbusters producers didn't aim to give the show some credibility by hiring someone with at least a tiny bit of scientific training, or someone who went to college even.  But then I remember, its an entertainment endeavor not a scientific endeavor, hence the special effects "experts".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've often wondered why Mythbusters producers did n't aim to give the show some credibility by hiring someone with at least a tiny bit of scientific training , or someone who went to college even .
But then I remember , its an entertainment endeavor not a scientific endeavor , hence the special effects " experts " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've often wondered why Mythbusters producers didn't aim to give the show some credibility by hiring someone with at least a tiny bit of scientific training, or someone who went to college even.
But then I remember, its an entertainment endeavor not a scientific endeavor, hence the special effects "experts".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845</id>
	<title>Queue all the anti-war nutjobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like, this is part of a military plot to demonstrate to the Chinese (and others) that the moon is U.S. territory....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like , this is part of a military plot to demonstrate to the Chinese ( and others ) that the moon is U.S. territory... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like, this is part of a military plot to demonstrate to the Chinese (and others) that the moon is U.S. territory....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360691</id>
	<title>do not explode the moon</title>
	<author>Max\_W</author>
	<datestamp>1245249240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We know by now that nature is vulnerable. Moon is relatively small. Why make a big explosion on it? One can use drilling for research.
<br> <br>
The system Earth-Moon can be destabilized by such explosions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We know by now that nature is vulnerable .
Moon is relatively small .
Why make a big explosion on it ?
One can use drilling for research .
The system Earth-Moon can be destabilized by such explosions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know by now that nature is vulnerable.
Moon is relatively small.
Why make a big explosion on it?
One can use drilling for research.
The system Earth-Moon can be destabilized by such explosions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350177</id>
	<title>I wonder ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245177000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... how high the debris fallout will be, since gravity on the moon is very low. The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust, how long will it take for dust to settle? Will dust escape out of the lunar surface into space?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... how high the debris fallout will be , since gravity on the moon is very low .
The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust , how long will it take for dust to settle ?
Will dust escape out of the lunar surface into space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... how high the debris fallout will be, since gravity on the moon is very low.
The lunar surface is made up of very fine dust, how long will it take for dust to settle?
Will dust escape out of the lunar surface into space?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28355357</id>
	<title>Okay..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245155700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So who says it's okay for NASA to blow up part of the moon? I mean, for one, are they freakin stupid? Altering the mass of the moon (even if slightly)? Come on now.</p><p>Here we go again, with the U.S. thinking they own the world; and now the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So who says it 's okay for NASA to blow up part of the moon ?
I mean , for one , are they freakin stupid ?
Altering the mass of the moon ( even if slightly ) ?
Come on now.Here we go again , with the U.S. thinking they own the world ; and now the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So who says it's okay for NASA to blow up part of the moon?
I mean, for one, are they freakin stupid?
Altering the mass of the moon (even if slightly)?
Come on now.Here we go again, with the U.S. thinking they own the world; and now the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351821</id>
	<title>What time will it happen?</title>
	<author>asdef</author>
	<datestamp>1245182760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else notice that while all the articles provided the time that the impact would happen, none provided a time zone reference so that those who want to plan to watch it know what time they need to be outside with their telescope?  Just my 2 cents on the reporting.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else notice that while all the articles provided the time that the impact would happen , none provided a time zone reference so that those who want to plan to watch it know what time they need to be outside with their telescope ?
Just my 2 cents on the reporting.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else notice that while all the articles provided the time that the impact would happen, none provided a time zone reference so that those who want to plan to watch it know what time they need to be outside with their telescope?
Just my 2 cents on the reporting.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>pzs</author>
	<datestamp>1245172860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To anybody who doesn't get this, it's a reference to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Tick\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org">The Tick</a> [wikipedia.org], a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation. In one of the episodes, a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon. For some reason. I seem to remember that later in the series, you can still see the partially written word "Chairface" in the moon.</p><p>My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot. He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal. Nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To anybody who does n't get this , it 's a reference to The Tick [ wikipedia.org ] , a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation .
In one of the episodes , a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon .
For some reason .
I seem to remember that later in the series , you can still see the partially written word " Chairface " in the moon.My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and , for some reason , has to fight a version of himself made out of snot .
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal .
Nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To anybody who doesn't get this, it's a reference to The Tick [wikipedia.org], a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation.
In one of the episodes, a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon.
For some reason.
I seem to remember that later in the series, you can still see the partially written word "Chairface" in the moon.My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot.
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal.
Nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356255</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245161400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lolwut? Cuba? dude...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lolwut ?
Cuba ? dude.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lolwut?
Cuba? dude...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353187</id>
	<title>Lou Reed was right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245145020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I was up in the morning with the TV blarin'<br>brush my teeth sittin' watchin' the news<br>All the beaches were closed the ocean was a Red Sea<br>but there was no one there to part in two<br>There was no fresh salad because there's hypos in the cabbage<br>Staten Island disappeared at noon<br>And they say the midwest is in great distress<br>and NASA blew up the moon"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I was up in the morning with the TV blarin'brush my teeth sittin ' watchin ' the newsAll the beaches were closed the ocean was a Red Seabut there was no one there to part in twoThere was no fresh salad because there 's hypos in the cabbageStaten Island disappeared at noonAnd they say the midwest is in great distressand NASA blew up the moon "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I was up in the morning with the TV blarin'brush my teeth sittin' watchin' the newsAll the beaches were closed the ocean was a Red Seabut there was no one there to part in twoThere was no fresh salad because there's hypos in the cabbageStaten Island disappeared at noonAnd they say the midwest is in great distressand NASA blew up the moon"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349079</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>synth7</author>
	<datestamp>1245173520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<i>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon? There's plenty on this planet. I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.</i>
</p><p>
Why do you hate science?  And, no, I'm not being facetious.  Humanity is reaching a potential ceiling on this planet's resources, and you deride efforts to determine whether we can ever get off this rock and sustain ourselves?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in a financial crisis , and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon ?
There 's plenty on this planet .
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars .
Why do you hate science ?
And , no , I 'm not being facetious .
Humanity is reaching a potential ceiling on this planet 's resources , and you deride efforts to determine whether we can ever get off this rock and sustain ourselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon?
There's plenty on this planet.
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.
Why do you hate science?
And, no, I'm not being facetious.
Humanity is reaching a potential ceiling on this planet's resources, and you deride efforts to determine whether we can ever get off this rock and sustain ourselves?
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349657</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, the moon is still REALLY pissed about us landing on it 40 years ago and not asking for its permission- that whole planting the flag in the surface... that hurt!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the moon is still REALLY pissed about us landing on it 40 years ago and not asking for its permission- that whole planting the flag in the surface... that hurt !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the moon is still REALLY pissed about us landing on it 40 years ago and not asking for its permission- that whole planting the flag in the surface... that hurt!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352781</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1245143520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nonsense. Many of the various scientific fields are highly dogmatic and, even today, still reject obviously factual material which would wreak havoc with the prevailing world view. They're rejected as being poorly researched, overlooked as ooparts, and a myriad of reasons.</p><p>Take, for instance, the stubborn insistence of contemporary 'evolutionary darwinists' that there is no plausible way that anything other than slow gradual change (or punctuated equilibrium) could've resulted in change within our universe. They apply the damn theory (which has some pretty serious global-application sticking points!) to anything and everything. Why, oh why, do you need a unified theory? Isn't it possible that something else might apply?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nonsense .
Many of the various scientific fields are highly dogmatic and , even today , still reject obviously factual material which would wreak havoc with the prevailing world view .
They 're rejected as being poorly researched , overlooked as ooparts , and a myriad of reasons.Take , for instance , the stubborn insistence of contemporary 'evolutionary darwinists ' that there is no plausible way that anything other than slow gradual change ( or punctuated equilibrium ) could 've resulted in change within our universe .
They apply the damn theory ( which has some pretty serious global-application sticking points !
) to anything and everything .
Why , oh why , do you need a unified theory ?
Is n't it possible that something else might apply ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nonsense.
Many of the various scientific fields are highly dogmatic and, even today, still reject obviously factual material which would wreak havoc with the prevailing world view.
They're rejected as being poorly researched, overlooked as ooparts, and a myriad of reasons.Take, for instance, the stubborn insistence of contemporary 'evolutionary darwinists' that there is no plausible way that anything other than slow gradual change (or punctuated equilibrium) could've resulted in change within our universe.
They apply the damn theory (which has some pretty serious global-application sticking points!
) to anything and everything.
Why, oh why, do you need a unified theory?
Isn't it possible that something else might apply?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349643</id>
	<title>Um, no. Actually...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After LRO decouples, the launch vehicle has to be set down on the moon anyway so it doesn't become orbital space junk. LCROSS will get science out of what would otherwise just be housekeeping.</p><p>The impact will be visible from some places on Earth if you have a good scope- &gt;10". There's a google group to co-ordinate amateur observations with the pros: http://groups.google.com/group/lcross\_observation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After LRO decouples , the launch vehicle has to be set down on the moon anyway so it does n't become orbital space junk .
LCROSS will get science out of what would otherwise just be housekeeping.The impact will be visible from some places on Earth if you have a good scope- &gt; 10 " .
There 's a google group to co-ordinate amateur observations with the pros : http : //groups.google.com/group/lcross \ _observation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After LRO decouples, the launch vehicle has to be set down on the moon anyway so it doesn't become orbital space junk.
LCROSS will get science out of what would otherwise just be housekeeping.The impact will be visible from some places on Earth if you have a good scope- &gt;10".
There's a google group to co-ordinate amateur observations with the pros: http://groups.google.com/group/lcross\_observation</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350363</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spooooooon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spooooooon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spooooooon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349143</id>
	<title>It's all part of the conspiracy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the release of new more powerful orbital telescopes, and with the impending arrival on the moon of other nations (india, or china, for example), NASA had to cover it's tracks in the moon landing hoax... They will detonate this explosive then later reveal they mistakenly blew up the Apollo landing site! This will abdicate any obligation to prove we ever landed!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the release of new more powerful orbital telescopes , and with the impending arrival on the moon of other nations ( india , or china , for example ) , NASA had to cover it 's tracks in the moon landing hoax... They will detonate this explosive then later reveal they mistakenly blew up the Apollo landing site !
This will abdicate any obligation to prove we ever landed !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the release of new more powerful orbital telescopes, and with the impending arrival on the moon of other nations (india, or china, for example), NASA had to cover it's tracks in the moon landing hoax... They will detonate this explosive then later reveal they mistakenly blew up the Apollo landing site!
This will abdicate any obligation to prove we ever landed!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356077</id>
	<title>6 miles - non SI</title>
	<author>Tired and Emotional</author>
	<datestamp>1245160080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is NASA using non-SI units again? Didn't they learn that lesson from the last time it caused a screw up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is NASA using non-SI units again ?
Did n't they learn that lesson from the last time it caused a screw up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is NASA using non-SI units again?
Didn't they learn that lesson from the last time it caused a screw up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since Satya Harvey is listed as the "SF Astrology Examiner" I think it is likely that she <i>is</i> serious.  She also posted a <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-12038-SF-Astrology-Examiner~y2009m6d12-Response-to-comments-about-the-lunar-orbiter-article" title="examiner.com">follow up</a> [examiner.com].
<br> <br>
In her follow-up, she explains that she does not think that science is the only way that knowledge is revealed to people.  She is entitled to her opinion, of course, but that does not mean that we have to agree with or respect it.  The beauty of science is that it is something of an amorphous blob.  If it turns out that astrology <i>does</i> reveal things about the universe that current science cannot observe, science will hungrily scoop it up and make it a part of itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Satya Harvey is listed as the " SF Astrology Examiner " I think it is likely that she is serious .
She also posted a follow up [ examiner.com ] .
In her follow-up , she explains that she does not think that science is the only way that knowledge is revealed to people .
She is entitled to her opinion , of course , but that does not mean that we have to agree with or respect it .
The beauty of science is that it is something of an amorphous blob .
If it turns out that astrology does reveal things about the universe that current science can not observe , science will hungrily scoop it up and make it a part of itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Satya Harvey is listed as the "SF Astrology Examiner" I think it is likely that she is serious.
She also posted a follow up [examiner.com].
In her follow-up, she explains that she does not think that science is the only way that knowledge is revealed to people.
She is entitled to her opinion, of course, but that does not mean that we have to agree with or respect it.
The beauty of science is that it is something of an amorphous blob.
If it turns out that astrology does reveal things about the universe that current science cannot observe, science will hungrily scoop it up and make it a part of itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019</id>
	<title>Cheese?</title>
	<author>bryan1945</author>
	<datestamp>1245173280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will they also integrate a cheese flavor detector?  How many thousands of years has human kind been wondering what flavor of cheese the moon is?</p><p>My hope is a nice sharp cheddar, but with all those holes you can see on the surface I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will they also integrate a cheese flavor detector ?
How many thousands of years has human kind been wondering what flavor of cheese the moon is ? My hope is a nice sharp cheddar , but with all those holes you can see on the surface I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will they also integrate a cheese flavor detector?
How many thousands of years has human kind been wondering what flavor of cheese the moon is?My hope is a nice sharp cheddar, but with all those holes you can see on the surface I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349565</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>bencoder</author>
	<datestamp>1245175080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF105-The\_Schlorbians\_Strike\_Again.jpg" title="pbfcomics.com">Just make sure they spell it right.</a> [pbfcomics.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just make sure they spell it right .
[ pbfcomics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just make sure they spell it right.
[pbfcomics.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352473</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of a crappy film...</title>
	<author>spydabyte</author>
	<datestamp>1245185340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah that was just in the film version. Read the book, it's much better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah that was just in the film version .
Read the book , it 's much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah that was just in the film version.
Read the book, it's much better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353129</id>
	<title>holy crap!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245144720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one who's reminded of the brilliant Mr. Show skit?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who 's reminded of the brilliant Mr. Show skit ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Csj7vMKy4EI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who's reminded of the brilliant Mr. Show skit?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349589</id>
	<title>Japan is going to be...</title>
	<author>zamfield</author>
	<datestamp>1245175140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pissed that all their maps will be wrong after this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pissed that all their maps will be wrong after this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pissed that all their maps will be wrong after this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353661</id>
	<title>Re:I hope everyone is learning an important lesson</title>
	<author>eigenstates</author>
	<datestamp>1245146760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Pinto must have had water left over in the engine block or radiator...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Pinto must have had water left over in the engine block or radiator.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Pinto must have had water left over in the engine block or radiator...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350301</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>cowscows</author>
	<datestamp>1245177420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have the technology. The time is now. Science can wait no longer. Children are our future. American can, should, must, and will blow up the moon.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdT2HqoV198" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdT2HqoV198</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have the technology .
The time is now .
Science can wait no longer .
Children are our future .
American can , should , must , and will blow up the moon.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = VdT2HqoV198 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have the technology.
The time is now.
Science can wait no longer.
Children are our future.
American can, should, must, and will blow up the moon.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdT2HqoV198 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28361031</id>
	<title>To the Moon!</title>
	<author>AgentSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1245251040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To the Moon! Alice! TO THE MOON!</p><p>Actually this reminds me more of the Pave The Earth movement.<br><a href="http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/pave.html" title="geocities.com">http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/pave.html</a> [geocities.com]</p><p>Which actually ties in with CHROME THE MOON!<br><a href="http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/crmoon.html" title="geocities.com">http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/crmoon.html</a> [geocities.com]</p><p>Shooting a projectile into the moon is minor. Meh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To the Moon !
Alice ! TO THE MOON ! Actually this reminds me more of the Pave The Earth movement.http : //www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/pave.html [ geocities.com ] Which actually ties in with CHROME THE MOON ! http : //www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/crmoon.html [ geocities.com ] Shooting a projectile into the moon is minor .
Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the Moon!
Alice! TO THE MOON!Actually this reminds me more of the Pave The Earth movement.http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/pave.html [geocities.com]Which actually ties in with CHROME THE MOON!http://www.geocities.com/southbeach/1380/crmoon.html [geocities.com]Shooting a projectile into the moon is minor.
Meh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351717</id>
	<title>Re:The One Minute Case for Designer Babies</title>
	<author>GreedyCapitalist</author>
	<datestamp>1245182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ooops, I got my Slashdot threads mixed up.  I blame Firefox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooops , I got my Slashdot threads mixed up .
I blame Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooops, I got my Slashdot threads mixed up.
I blame Firefox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349177</id>
	<title>Visibility?</title>
	<author>gehrehmee</author>
	<datestamp>1245173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big explosion. What are the odds this would be visible from earth? Naked eye? Or With a decent telescope?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big explosion .
What are the odds this would be visible from earth ?
Naked eye ?
Or With a decent telescope ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big explosion.
What are the odds this would be visible from earth?
Naked eye?
Or With a decent telescope?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349393</id>
	<title>On behalf of Whalers...</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1245174480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... this means WAR!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... this means WAR ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... this means WAR!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349941</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Thraxen</author>
	<datestamp>1245176280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mission will supposedly cost $78 million.  A lot of money to the average person... but a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions we're wasting on needless wars and bailing out failed banks and automotive companies.  Guess which I think is being better spent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mission will supposedly cost $ 78 million .
A lot of money to the average person... but a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions we 're wasting on needless wars and bailing out failed banks and automotive companies .
Guess which I think is being better spent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mission will supposedly cost $78 million.
A lot of money to the average person... but a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions we're wasting on needless wars and bailing out failed banks and automotive companies.
Guess which I think is being better spent?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349173</id>
	<title>Look out moon, America's gonna get you</title>
	<author>Wannabe Code Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1245173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have the technology... the time is now... science can wait no longer... children are our future. America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon!</p><p>

&lt;stolen&gt;<a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1c81d0df12/mr-show-america-blows-up-the-moon-from-thaffner" title="funnyordie.com">http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1c81d0df12/mr-show-america-blows-up-the-moon-from-thaffner</a> [funnyordie.com]&lt;/stolen&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have the technology... the time is now... science can wait no longer... children are our future .
America can , should , must , and will blow up the moon !
http : //www.funnyordie.com/videos/1c81d0df12/mr-show-america-blows-up-the-moon-from-thaffner [ funnyordie.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have the technology... the time is now... science can wait no longer... children are our future.
America can, should, must, and will blow up the moon!
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1c81d0df12/mr-show-america-blows-up-the-moon-from-thaffner [funnyordie.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350031</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1245176520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, everyone knows that it takes a <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/15/if-i-watch-this-i-hope-the-moon-will-hit-the-earth/" title="discovermagazine.com">brown dwarf chunk to radically change the gravitational pull of the moon.</a> [discovermagazine.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , everyone knows that it takes a brown dwarf chunk to radically change the gravitational pull of the moon .
[ discovermagazine.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, everyone knows that it takes a brown dwarf chunk to radically change the gravitational pull of the moon.
[discovermagazine.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348895</id>
	<title>Armageddon!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This people is nuts. They'll cause a slight shift in the moon's orbit with disastrous consequences for gravity and weather on planet Earth. It will be the end of life as we know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This people is nuts .
They 'll cause a slight shift in the moon 's orbit with disastrous consequences for gravity and weather on planet Earth .
It will be the end of life as we know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This people is nuts.
They'll cause a slight shift in the moon's orbit with disastrous consequences for gravity and weather on planet Earth.
It will be the end of life as we know it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349263</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone with a little basic physics knowledge please show this idiot the mass of the moon is more than significant to deal with the minor event that will occur when this explosion takes place?  While I can't do it of the top of my head, I at least have enough common sense to know such a thing (knocked off orbit) won't happen.  I really hope you were trolling and not that stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone with a little basic physics knowledge please show this idiot the mass of the moon is more than significant to deal with the minor event that will occur when this explosion takes place ?
While I ca n't do it of the top of my head , I at least have enough common sense to know such a thing ( knocked off orbit ) wo n't happen .
I really hope you were trolling and not that stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone with a little basic physics knowledge please show this idiot the mass of the moon is more than significant to deal with the minor event that will occur when this explosion takes place?
While I can't do it of the top of my head, I at least have enough common sense to know such a thing (knocked off orbit) won't happen.
I really hope you were trolling and not that stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350349</id>
	<title>Big Mistake</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will inevitably be viewed by the inhabitants of the moon as an act of war! Their retribution will be swift and deadly, as they retaliate by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Moon\_Is\_a\_Harsh\_Mistress" title="wikipedia.org">throwing rocks at us</a> [wikipedia.org]. Our days are numbered!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will inevitably be viewed by the inhabitants of the moon as an act of war !
Their retribution will be swift and deadly , as they retaliate by throwing rocks at us [ wikipedia.org ] .
Our days are numbered !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will inevitably be viewed by the inhabitants of the moon as an act of war!
Their retribution will be swift and deadly, as they retaliate by throwing rocks at us [wikipedia.org].
Our days are numbered!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350905</id>
	<title>Translations through Tin-foil hats...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245179340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. The US is actually blowing up China's secret base on the moon.<br>2. The US is actually blowing up a secret alien base on the moon.<br>3. The US is actually blowing up a secret Saddam Hussein base on the moon in order to steal it's oil reserves.<br>4. The US is blowing up a secret Amazon Women base in order to steal their water reserves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
The US is actually blowing up China 's secret base on the moon.2 .
The US is actually blowing up a secret alien base on the moon.3 .
The US is actually blowing up a secret Saddam Hussein base on the moon in order to steal it 's oil reserves.4 .
The US is blowing up a secret Amazon Women base in order to steal their water reserves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
The US is actually blowing up China's secret base on the moon.2.
The US is actually blowing up a secret alien base on the moon.3.
The US is actually blowing up a secret Saddam Hussein base on the moon in order to steal it's oil reserves.4.
The US is blowing up a secret Amazon Women base in order to steal their water reserves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350987</id>
	<title>Re:NASA to blow up the moon</title>
	<author>Sabathius</author>
	<datestamp>1245179640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're Earthlings. Let's blow-up Earth things!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're Earthlings .
Let 's blow-up Earth things !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're Earthlings.
Let's blow-up Earth things!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349735</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1245175680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the analogy is apropos - after all, we have NASA (predominantly composed of men) sending a "probe" consisting of a long, thin tube with a payload at it's head, to slam into a crater (i.e. hole) on the Moon.</p><p>Of course Nasa should ask first - isn't it rape otherwise?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the analogy is apropos - after all , we have NASA ( predominantly composed of men ) sending a " probe " consisting of a long , thin tube with a payload at it 's head , to slam into a crater ( i.e .
hole ) on the Moon.Of course Nasa should ask first - is n't it rape otherwise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the analogy is apropos - after all, we have NASA (predominantly composed of men) sending a "probe" consisting of a long, thin tube with a payload at it's head, to slam into a crater (i.e.
hole) on the Moon.Of course Nasa should ask first - isn't it rape otherwise?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353069</id>
	<title>EX(MICHAEL BAY)SPLOSIONS!!!  !!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245144540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>EX(MICHAEL BAY)SPLOSIONS!!!  !!!

<p>(Yes, Filter, I know it's like yelling.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>EX ( MICHAEL BAY ) SPLOSIONS ! ! !
! ! ! ( Yes , Filter , I know it 's like yelling .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EX(MICHAEL BAY)SPLOSIONS!!!
!!!

(Yes, Filter, I know it's like yelling.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350259</id>
	<title>Quad laser of retribution</title>
	<author>evilkasper</author>
	<datestamp>1245177300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is gonna seriously tick off Ignignokt and Err. They're from the moon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is gon na seriously tick off Ignignokt and Err .
They 're from the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is gonna seriously tick off Ignignokt and Err.
They're from the moon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</id>
	<title>Raping the moon</title>
	<author>pzs</author>
	<datestamp>1245172620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really can't tell if <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-12038-SF-Astrology-Examiner~y2009m6d10-Orbiter-crashing-into-the-moon" title="examiner.com">this article</a> [examiner.com] is serious or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really ca n't tell if this article [ examiner.com ] is serious or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really can't tell if this article [examiner.com] is serious or not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350929</id>
	<title>Re:Use inflammatory language much?</title>
	<author>dontPanik</author>
	<datestamp>1245179460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think there will be an explosion period, because my understanding of explosions tells me that an explosion needs oxygen and of course there would be none on the moon.<br>
<br>
So I'm lead to believe they mean six mile high dust plume (which reportidly will be visible to amatuer astronomers).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think there will be an explosion period , because my understanding of explosions tells me that an explosion needs oxygen and of course there would be none on the moon .
So I 'm lead to believe they mean six mile high dust plume ( which reportidly will be visible to amatuer astronomers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think there will be an explosion period, because my understanding of explosions tells me that an explosion needs oxygen and of course there would be none on the moon.
So I'm lead to believe they mean six mile high dust plume (which reportidly will be visible to amatuer astronomers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349671</id>
	<title>Re:One sixth the gravity</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1245175440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not quite, since you're forgetting the atmosphere's effects.</htmltext>
<tokenext>not quite , since you 're forgetting the atmosphere 's effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not quite, since you're forgetting the atmosphere's effects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349215</id>
	<title>What will the Martians think?</title>
	<author>joeflies</author>
	<datestamp>1245173940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the US nearly went to war because of the nuclear arms being shipped to Cuba, what will the Martians think about a demonstration of military power on an uninhabited moon? Without proper diplomatic relationships between Mars &amp; Earth, I doubt that diplomacy will be able to calm their frayed nerves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the US nearly went to war because of the nuclear arms being shipped to Cuba , what will the Martians think about a demonstration of military power on an uninhabited moon ?
Without proper diplomatic relationships between Mars &amp; Earth , I doubt that diplomacy will be able to calm their frayed nerves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the US nearly went to war because of the nuclear arms being shipped to Cuba, what will the Martians think about a demonstration of military power on an uninhabited moon?
Without proper diplomatic relationships between Mars &amp; Earth, I doubt that diplomacy will be able to calm their frayed nerves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>tb3</author>
	<datestamp>1245173340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sept 13, 1999. Ten years and a few days late. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space:1999" title="wikipedia.org">Space:1999</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sept 13 , 1999 .
Ten years and a few days late .
Space : 1999 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sept 13, 1999.
Ten years and a few days late.
Space:1999 [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349149</id>
	<title>Beginning of the end?</title>
	<author>arizwebfoot</author>
	<datestamp>1245173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>December 21st, 2012?</htmltext>
<tokenext>December 21st , 2012 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>December 21st, 2012?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350369</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>MooseTick</author>
	<datestamp>1245177600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The last I heard, the moon is still affected by gravity. Therefore, even if the moon split in 2, it would still be held together and its orbit would not deviate. So, how would this event potentially be "radically changing the gravitational pull, disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The last I heard , the moon is still affected by gravity .
Therefore , even if the moon split in 2 , it would still be held together and its orbit would not deviate .
So , how would this event potentially be " radically changing the gravitational pull , disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last I heard, the moon is still affected by gravity.
Therefore, even if the moon split in 2, it would still be held together and its orbit would not deviate.
So, how would this event potentially be "radically changing the gravitational pull, disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350527</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>Paxton</author>
	<datestamp>1245178080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, take it seriously.  The URL has "astrology" in it.  Definitely take it seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , take it seriously .
The URL has " astrology " in it .
Definitely take it seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, take it seriously.
The URL has "astrology" in it.
Definitely take it seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352851</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1245143820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you take a <a href="http://www.thunderbolts.info/webnews/120707electriccraters.htm" title="thunderbolts.info">closer look</a> [thunderbolts.info] at those "craters" on the moon. You sure they were made by <i>asteroids</i> or might there be a mechanism which is more consistent with the available evidence (contemporary scientific stasis be damned)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you take a closer look [ thunderbolts.info ] at those " craters " on the moon .
You sure they were made by asteroids or might there be a mechanism which is more consistent with the available evidence ( contemporary scientific stasis be damned ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you take a closer look [thunderbolts.info] at those "craters" on the moon.
You sure they were made by asteroids or might there be a mechanism which is more consistent with the available evidence (contemporary scientific stasis be damned)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352809</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Ragzouken</author>
	<datestamp>1245143700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You didn't wait at all! You just continued to talk before he had a chance to look at a picture of the moon. Not cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You did n't wait at all !
You just continued to talk before he had a chance to look at a picture of the moon .
Not cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You didn't wait at all!
You just continued to talk before he had a chance to look at a picture of the moon.
Not cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351995</id>
	<title>What about preserving history?</title>
	<author>Auxis</author>
	<datestamp>1245183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if they accidentally blow up the first bootprints on the moon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if they accidentally blow up the first bootprints on the moon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if they accidentally blow up the first bootprints on the moon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357093</id>
	<title>This could be interpreted as an act of war</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245167580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are so going to get mooned</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are so going to get mooned</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are so going to get mooned</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350523</id>
	<title>Christ, you people are ignorant.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Several S-IVB stages from Saturn V rockets impacted the moon in the 1960s and '70s.  All of them were more massive than the little Centaur.</p><p>At least one Apollo mission left seismic sensors on the moon, which recorded the effects of S-IVB impacts on later flights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several S-IVB stages from Saturn V rockets impacted the moon in the 1960s and '70s .
All of them were more massive than the little Centaur.At least one Apollo mission left seismic sensors on the moon , which recorded the effects of S-IVB impacts on later flights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several S-IVB stages from Saturn V rockets impacted the moon in the 1960s and '70s.
All of them were more massive than the little Centaur.At least one Apollo mission left seismic sensors on the moon, which recorded the effects of S-IVB impacts on later flights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359653</id>
	<title>"I wonder when they're going to Destroy your face"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245240840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess Canned Heat finally has their answer.<br>http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/c/cannedheat12183/poormoon446466.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Canned Heat finally has their answer.http : //www.stlyrics.com/songs/c/cannedheat12183/poormoon446466.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Canned Heat finally has their answer.http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/c/cannedheat12183/poormoon446466.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351461</id>
	<title>Two guys you need to call in such a case:</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1245181500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0491764/" title="imdb.com">Stephen Baldwin and Dirk Benedict.</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stephen Baldwin and Dirk Benedict .
[ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stephen Baldwin and Dirk Benedict.
[imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349465</id>
	<title>Nuke it from space</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say we take off and nuke the entire site from space...<br>It's the only way to be sure...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we take off and nuke the entire site from space...It 's the only way to be sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we take off and nuke the entire site from space...It's the only way to be sure...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348775</id>
	<title>All i can say..</title>
	<author>Mitsoid</author>
	<datestamp>1245172560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I can say.. is HOT!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I can say.. is HOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I can say.. is HOT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, why not waste some more tax payer money you dolts! Good thing our economy is falling apart while these goofballs play with their toy rockets. I'm frankly puzzled that nobody else seems to be thinking about this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , why not waste some more tax payer money you dolts !
Good thing our economy is falling apart while these goofballs play with their toy rockets .
I 'm frankly puzzled that nobody else seems to be thinking about this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, why not waste some more tax payer money you dolts!
Good thing our economy is falling apart while these goofballs play with their toy rockets.
I'm frankly puzzled that nobody else seems to be thinking about this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350763</id>
	<title>The most accurate weather forcast ever.</title>
	<author>Innova</author>
	<datestamp>1245178860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can guarantee that it will be very cloudy at my house (or wherever I try to move my telescope to) during the early morning hours of October 8.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can guarantee that it will be very cloudy at my house ( or wherever I try to move my telescope to ) during the early morning hours of October 8 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can guarantee that it will be very cloudy at my house (or wherever I try to move my telescope to) during the early morning hours of October 8.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352771</id>
	<title>Re:Look out moon, America's gonna get you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>blow up the moon!! blow up the moon!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>blow up the moon ! !
blow up the moon !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blow up the moon!!
blow up the moon!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350533</id>
	<title>NOES, DON BLOW 0P TH3 M00N!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OGM U'LL KEEL US ALL!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OGM U 'LL KEEL US ALL ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OGM U'LL KEEL US ALL!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350307</id>
	<title>The One Minute Case for Designer Babies</title>
	<author>GreedyCapitalist</author>
	<datestamp>1245177420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From <a href="http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/designer\%20babies/" title="rationalmind.net" rel="nofollow">http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/designer\%20babies/</a> [rationalmind.net]
<br> <br>
Genetic screening via sexual selection has been practiced since the dawn of life itself.  No one suggests that we should pick a mate entirely at random, so the objection to genetic screening and engineering is due to the element of technology. Their objections are not to "designer babies" as such, but to the use of technology to improve the lives of human beings. They apply equally to a child whose genes are altered after birth, or to an adult. The logical conclusion of this neo-luddism is the opposition of all man-made improvements to human life as &#226;oeunnatural.&#226;</htmltext>
<tokenext>From http : //oneminute.rationalmind.net/designer \ % 20babies/ [ rationalmind.net ] Genetic screening via sexual selection has been practiced since the dawn of life itself .
No one suggests that we should pick a mate entirely at random , so the objection to genetic screening and engineering is due to the element of technology .
Their objections are not to " designer babies " as such , but to the use of technology to improve the lives of human beings .
They apply equally to a child whose genes are altered after birth , or to an adult .
The logical conclusion of this neo-luddism is the opposition of all man-made improvements to human life as   oeunnatural.  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>From http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/designer\%20babies/ [rationalmind.net]
 
Genetic screening via sexual selection has been practiced since the dawn of life itself.
No one suggests that we should pick a mate entirely at random, so the objection to genetic screening and engineering is due to the element of technology.
Their objections are not to "designer babies" as such, but to the use of technology to improve the lives of human beings.
They apply equally to a child whose genes are altered after birth, or to an adult.
The logical conclusion of this neo-luddism is the opposition of all man-made improvements to human life as âoeunnatural.â</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353561</id>
	<title>Dr Evil Hit</title>
	<author>georgenh16</author>
	<datestamp>1245146400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The President: Jiminy Jumpin' Jesus, I can't believe we're gonna pay that madman. I got nukes out the ying-yang. Just let me launch one, for God's sake.<br>
Commander Gilmour: Sir. Are you suggesting that we blow up the moon?<br>...<br>
The President: Would you miss it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The President : Jiminy Jumpin ' Jesus , I ca n't believe we 're gon na pay that madman .
I got nukes out the ying-yang .
Just let me launch one , for God 's sake .
Commander Gilmour : Sir .
Are you suggesting that we blow up the moon ? .. .
The President : Would you miss it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The President: Jiminy Jumpin' Jesus, I can't believe we're gonna pay that madman.
I got nukes out the ying-yang.
Just let me launch one, for God's sake.
Commander Gilmour: Sir.
Are you suggesting that we blow up the moon?...
The President: Would you miss it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349991</id>
	<title>Re:One sixth the gravity</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1245176400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming this means the height of the debris (and not the fireball/whatever):</p><p>Doubtful.<br>Gravity is a force and thus affects the acceleration of mass, which runs on time squared.</p><p>Displacement runs flat with respect to velocity and time.</p><p>Add in some wiggle room due to the lack of atmosphere to slow shit down.</p><p>The "I'm lazy" estimate says this is more like a 800 foot explosion on earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming this means the height of the debris ( and not the fireball/whatever ) : Doubtful.Gravity is a force and thus affects the acceleration of mass , which runs on time squared.Displacement runs flat with respect to velocity and time.Add in some wiggle room due to the lack of atmosphere to slow shit down.The " I 'm lazy " estimate says this is more like a 800 foot explosion on earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming this means the height of the debris (and not the fireball/whatever):Doubtful.Gravity is a force and thus affects the acceleration of mass, which runs on time squared.Displacement runs flat with respect to velocity and time.Add in some wiggle room due to the lack of atmosphere to slow shit down.The "I'm lazy" estimate says this is more like a 800 foot explosion on earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351189</id>
	<title>Re: Queue all the anti-war nutjobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245180480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, as your post has ably demonstrated, it's the pro-war faction who are the nut-jobs. Congratulations, dumbass!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , as your post has ably demonstrated , it 's the pro-war faction who are the nut-jobs .
Congratulations , dumbass !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, as your post has ably demonstrated, it's the pro-war faction who are the nut-jobs.
Congratulations, dumbass!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351709</id>
	<title>Magical Weak Spot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but guidance systems these days are all about homing in on the magical weak spot.  It is likely that eddy currents in the accretion layers of the moon will repel striae in quadrature from the fissure, resulting in a large drogue which is eventually caught by the earth and dragged in a horrific obvious parody of the space elevator meme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but guidance systems these days are all about homing in on the magical weak spot .
It is likely that eddy currents in the accretion layers of the moon will repel striae in quadrature from the fissure , resulting in a large drogue which is eventually caught by the earth and dragged in a horrific obvious parody of the space elevator meme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but guidance systems these days are all about homing in on the magical weak spot.
It is likely that eddy currents in the accretion layers of the moon will repel striae in quadrature from the fissure, resulting in a large drogue which is eventually caught by the earth and dragged in a horrific obvious parody of the space elevator meme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349339</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1245174360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it was the second episode.  Chairface got as far as "CHA" (with rousing cheers from his henchmen in true cheerleader style: "Gimme a C!!") before The Tick's sidekick, Arthur, disabled the device by (iirc) unscrewing the flashlight that powered the laser (new batteries even!).  In the rest of the episodes of the season, whenever the moon was visible, you could clearly see "CHA" written on it.  In the second season, The Tick was set to the moon to fix it by setting explosives to fill in the craters that formed the letters.  He got the "C" cleaned up pretty easily before the world devourer, Galactus -- er, I mean, Omnipotus, shows up and causes trouble.  The Tick eventually convinces Omnipotus to leave, but allows the cosmic giant to take a bite out of the moon to tide him over until he can find another planet to eat.  Thus, for the rest of season 2 (and sadly, the series), the moon can be seen in the background with the letters "HA" and a big bite out of its side.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it was the second episode .
Chairface got as far as " CHA " ( with rousing cheers from his henchmen in true cheerleader style : " Gim me a C ! !
" ) before The Tick 's sidekick , Arthur , disabled the device by ( iirc ) unscrewing the flashlight that powered the laser ( new batteries even ! ) .
In the rest of the episodes of the season , whenever the moon was visible , you could clearly see " CHA " written on it .
In the second season , The Tick was set to the moon to fix it by setting explosives to fill in the craters that formed the letters .
He got the " C " cleaned up pretty easily before the world devourer , Galactus -- er , I mean , Omnipotus , shows up and causes trouble .
The Tick eventually convinces Omnipotus to leave , but allows the cosmic giant to take a bite out of the moon to tide him over until he can find another planet to eat .
Thus , for the rest of season 2 ( and sadly , the series ) , the moon can be seen in the background with the letters " HA " and a big bite out of its side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it was the second episode.
Chairface got as far as "CHA" (with rousing cheers from his henchmen in true cheerleader style: "Gimme a C!!
") before The Tick's sidekick, Arthur, disabled the device by (iirc) unscrewing the flashlight that powered the laser (new batteries even!).
In the rest of the episodes of the season, whenever the moon was visible, you could clearly see "CHA" written on it.
In the second season, The Tick was set to the moon to fix it by setting explosives to fill in the craters that formed the letters.
He got the "C" cleaned up pretty easily before the world devourer, Galactus -- er, I mean, Omnipotus, shows up and causes trouble.
The Tick eventually convinces Omnipotus to leave, but allows the cosmic giant to take a bite out of the moon to tide him over until he can find another planet to eat.
Thus, for the rest of season 2 (and sadly, the series), the moon can be seen in the background with the letters "HA" and a big bite out of its side.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350183</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1245177060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because very few real-world scientists have the kind of generalized skills needed to be on the show. Most scientists and engineers are pretty specialized. Good luck with finding a physicist who can also put together a circuit board, weld, and handle explosives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because very few real-world scientists have the kind of generalized skills needed to be on the show .
Most scientists and engineers are pretty specialized .
Good luck with finding a physicist who can also put together a circuit board , weld , and handle explosives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because very few real-world scientists have the kind of generalized skills needed to be on the show.
Most scientists and engineers are pretty specialized.
Good luck with finding a physicist who can also put together a circuit board, weld, and handle explosives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28361989</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Demiansmark</author>
	<datestamp>1245255960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah! Was hoping I'd find this here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah !
Was hoping I 'd find this here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah!
Was hoping I'd find this here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350647</id>
	<title>Old idea.  60 years, to be precise.</title>
	<author>DutchUncle</author>
	<datestamp>1245178500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Denied, prior art.  Robert Heinlein wrote advertising on the moon in 1949 in "The Man who Sold the Moon".  (Or maybe the publication counts as 1950?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Denied , prior art .
Robert Heinlein wrote advertising on the moon in 1949 in " The Man who Sold the Moon " .
( Or maybe the publication counts as 1950 ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Denied, prior art.
Robert Heinlein wrote advertising on the moon in 1949 in "The Man who Sold the Moon".
(Or maybe the publication counts as 1950?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348809</id>
	<title>Reminds me of a crappy film...</title>
	<author>jadedoto</author>
	<datestamp>1245172620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yea, remember that 2002 or whatever make of The Time Machine? With the fragmented moon? Lets just hope this time it doesn't come crashing down on Earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yea , remember that 2002 or whatever make of The Time Machine ?
With the fragmented moon ?
Lets just hope this time it does n't come crashing down on Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yea, remember that 2002 or whatever make of The Time Machine?
With the fragmented moon?
Lets just hope this time it doesn't come crashing down on Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350797</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>LingNoi</author>
	<datestamp>1245178980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"SF Astrology Examiner" as in someone who predicts your future from looking at star charts. In other words a woo woo magician.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" SF Astrology Examiner " as in someone who predicts your future from looking at star charts .
In other words a woo woo magician .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"SF Astrology Examiner" as in someone who predicts your future from looking at star charts.
In other words a woo woo magician.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</id>
	<title>Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>VAXcat</author>
	<datestamp>1245172920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...</htmltext>
<tokenext>SO , NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349119</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>sigxcpu</author>
	<datestamp>1245173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one will say "I told you so" when the guys on the moon will bomb us back!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one will say " I told you so " when the guys on the moon will bomb us back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one will say "I told you so" when the guys on the moon will bomb us back!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350953</id>
	<title>Where will the Americans stop???</title>
	<author>orignal</author>
	<datestamp>1245179520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Foreign countries are not good enough to bomb anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Foreign countries are not good enough to bomb anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Foreign countries are not good enough to bomb anymore?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351445</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first post is a Tick ref?</p><p>I salute you, sir or madam or other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first post is a Tick ref ? I salute you , sir or madam or other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first post is a Tick ref?I salute you, sir or madam or other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349561</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>actionbastard</author>
	<datestamp>1245175080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would, at least, take a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboy\_Bebop#Setting" title="wikipedia.org">Hyperspace Phased Gate</a> [wikipedia.org] explosion to damage the Moon in the fashion that you suggest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would , at least , take a Hyperspace Phased Gate [ wikipedia.org ] explosion to damage the Moon in the fashion that you suggest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would, at least, take a Hyperspace Phased Gate [wikipedia.org] explosion to damage the Moon in the fashion that you suggest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</id>
	<title>Nonsense</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1245172500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are using explosives to write NASA in the moon for all people to see. You won't succeed where Chairface failed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are using explosives to write NASA in the moon for all people to see .
You wo n't succeed where Chairface failed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are using explosives to write NASA in the moon for all people to see.
You won't succeed where Chairface failed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28371661</id>
	<title>Death Star</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245325020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That&#194;s not a moon... it&#194;s a space station..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That   s not a moon... it   s a space station... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"ThatÂs not a moon... itÂs a space station..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349039</id>
	<title>everything old is new again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wasn't this the excuse they gave when they wanted to nuke the moon instead of land a man on it to show up the ruskies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was n't this the excuse they gave when they wanted to nuke the moon instead of land a man on it to show up the ruskies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wasn't this the excuse they gave when they wanted to nuke the moon instead of land a man on it to show up the ruskies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357473</id>
	<title>If North Korea had a Space Program.</title>
	<author>bronney</author>
	<datestamp>1245171240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just can't help but imagine if NK has a space program and decided to send astronauts to the moon, what would USA, or the world think?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't help but imagine if NK has a space program and decided to send astronauts to the moon , what would USA , or the world think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't help but imagine if NK has a space program and decided to send astronauts to the moon, what would USA, or the world think?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349571</id>
	<title>Sir. Are you suggesting that we blow up the moon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would you miss it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you miss it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you miss it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356239</id>
	<title>So finally...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245161220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we're nuking something from orbit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we 're nuking something from orbit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we're nuking something from orbit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358419</id>
	<title>*sigh*</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1245182100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the only way we have to determine if there's water on a planet (or moon, in this case) is to blow part of it up, then maybe we shouldn't be going out there, yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the only way we have to determine if there 's water on a planet ( or moon , in this case ) is to blow part of it up , then maybe we should n't be going out there , yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the only way we have to determine if there's water on a planet (or moon, in this case) is to blow part of it up, then maybe we shouldn't be going out there, yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357257</id>
	<title>Re:Fiscally responsible?</title>
	<author>RedWizzard</author>
	<datestamp>1245169140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.</i> </p><p>Really?  Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do?  How about about not littering the moon's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water?  Oh, wait that will cost more money.</p></div><p>You do understand what "fiscally responsible" means, right? If doing the research another way would cost more money then crashing the spacecraft clearly is the fiscally responsible thing to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do .
Really ? Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do ?
How about about not littering the moon 's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water ?
Oh , wait that will cost more money.You do understand what " fiscally responsible " means , right ?
If doing the research another way would cost more money then crashing the spacecraft clearly is the fiscally responsible thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.
Really?  Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do?
How about about not littering the moon's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water?
Oh, wait that will cost more money.You do understand what "fiscally responsible" means, right?
If doing the research another way would cost more money then crashing the spacecraft clearly is the fiscally responsible thing to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349511</id>
	<title>Re:One sixth the gravity</title>
	<author>aardwolf64</author>
	<datestamp>1245174900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a 1 mile high explosion on Earth is your idea of a firecracker, I'd advise you to keep your firecrackers away from my house, sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a 1 mile high explosion on Earth is your idea of a firecracker , I 'd advise you to keep your firecrackers away from my house , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a 1 mile high explosion on Earth is your idea of a firecracker, I'd advise you to keep your firecrackers away from my house, sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349961</id>
	<title>Life</title>
	<author>pradeepsekar</author>
	<datestamp>1245176340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there is a chance for water there, there may also be a chance for life. Hitting that area in this manner may just reduce that probability to zero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is a chance for water there , there may also be a chance for life .
Hitting that area in this manner may just reduce that probability to zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is a chance for water there, there may also be a chance for life.
Hitting that area in this manner may just reduce that probability to zero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349273</id>
	<title>Watch out for...</title>
	<author>Higaran</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the morlocks, if your live past the impending ice age that will happen after this.  Come on I love NASA, but they have on occasion miscalculated things, this makes me worry.  Then again if it all goes wrong, it could be the best thing to happen for humanity.  It would pretty much be the end of all wars on the planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the morlocks , if your live past the impending ice age that will happen after this .
Come on I love NASA , but they have on occasion miscalculated things , this makes me worry .
Then again if it all goes wrong , it could be the best thing to happen for humanity .
It would pretty much be the end of all wars on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the morlocks, if your live past the impending ice age that will happen after this.
Come on I love NASA, but they have on occasion miscalculated things, this makes me worry.
Then again if it all goes wrong, it could be the best thing to happen for humanity.
It would pretty much be the end of all wars on the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350699</id>
	<title>That's no moon, its a space sta-BOOOOOM!!</title>
	<author>Papatoast</author>
	<datestamp>1245178620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, maybe it WAS a moon....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , maybe it WAS a moon... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, maybe it WAS a moon....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350231</id>
	<title>Military action disguised as an experiment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245177180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this the same area where the Chinese sent lunar probes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the same area where the Chinese sent lunar probes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the same area where the Chinese sent lunar probes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352353</id>
	<title>Re:Use inflammatory language much?</title>
	<author>u8i9o0</author>
	<datestamp>1245184860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inflammatory?  You mean like:</p><blockquote><div><p>ZOMG!!!! A <b>massive</b> explosion!!! A <b>six mile high</b> explosion!!!!<br>Or would that actually be a very, very modest explosion (especially in astronomical terms) triggering a six mile high debris plume?</p></div></blockquote><p>Right, astronomical terms.  On that scale, one could argue that Earth occupies an infinitesimally small volume so destroying it should be of only minor consequence as well.</p><p>How about we limit destructive tests to things that we have in multiple quantities?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Inflammatory ?
You mean like : ZOMG ! ! ! !
A massive explosion ! ! !
A six mile high explosion ! ! !
! Or would that actually be a very , very modest explosion ( especially in astronomical terms ) triggering a six mile high debris plume ? Right , astronomical terms .
On that scale , one could argue that Earth occupies an infinitesimally small volume so destroying it should be of only minor consequence as well.How about we limit destructive tests to things that we have in multiple quantities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inflammatory?
You mean like:ZOMG!!!!
A massive explosion!!!
A six mile high explosion!!!
!Or would that actually be a very, very modest explosion (especially in astronomical terms) triggering a six mile high debris plume?Right, astronomical terms.
On that scale, one could argue that Earth occupies an infinitesimally small volume so destroying it should be of only minor consequence as well.How about we limit destructive tests to things that we have in multiple quantities?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349695</id>
	<title>Re:Shock and Awe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fools... this will create far more terrorists than it will kill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fools... this will create far more terrorists than it will kill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fools... this will create far more terrorists than it will kill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359985</id>
	<title>My dad always said...</title>
	<author>thegermanpolice</author>
	<datestamp>1245244200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Dad always said "If you aim for the moon, you'll probably miss."<br> <br>
Shows you what he knew...<br> <br>Assuming they didn't mess up on the metric&gt;feet&gt;metric conversions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Dad always said " If you aim for the moon , you 'll probably miss .
" Shows you what he knew... Assuming they did n't mess up on the metric &gt; feet &gt; metric conversions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Dad always said "If you aim for the moon, you'll probably miss.
" 
Shows you what he knew... Assuming they didn't mess up on the metric&gt;feet&gt;metric conversions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351303</id>
	<title>They better hit the nazi base this time.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say no to space nazis!</p><p>(Obligatory Iron Sky teaser)<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KEueJnsu80</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Say no to space nazis !
( Obligatory Iron Sky teaser ) http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 4KEueJnsu80</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say no to space nazis!
(Obligatory Iron Sky teaser)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KEueJnsu80</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356233</id>
	<title>A cross on the moon, not LCROSS</title>
	<author>twosat</author>
	<datestamp>1245161160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some fundamentalist Christians would like to create a large cross shape on the moon using something like a lunar bulldozer or grader.  Not only would the whole world see the symbol of Christianity, but it would demoralize Muslims to have their religious symbol defaced by infidels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some fundamentalist Christians would like to create a large cross shape on the moon using something like a lunar bulldozer or grader .
Not only would the whole world see the symbol of Christianity , but it would demoralize Muslims to have their religious symbol defaced by infidels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some fundamentalist Christians would like to create a large cross shape on the moon using something like a lunar bulldozer or grader.
Not only would the whole world see the symbol of Christianity, but it would demoralize Muslims to have their religious symbol defaced by infidels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350355</id>
	<title>Too many questions...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1245177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they even have the right to just blast away at anything they want....what do other nations think of possibly crippling the moon should the explosion be too big.</p><p>What about this supposed crash into the earth, is this why they are really trying to nudge the moon off its course...</p><p>What if they had discovered something up on the moon, and wanted to destroy it (such as aliens) before we found out about it, or any other country (China) were to set foot on the moon, maybe there was an agreement with an alien life form to not divulge its existence to humankind.</p><p>What if this is really a ploy to hide the fact that we never went up to the moon, and by somehow disturbing or destroying the moons surface enough, to change any markers (footprints) left behind by our astronauts (supposedly), they would never prove otherwise<br>that we never REALLY set foot on the moon, and that the whole thing was staged.</p><p>What if this back fires, and destroys the moon in half, and changes our whole magnetic field caused by the moon's pull, could we see a chaotic future with anarchy running a muck?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they even have the right to just blast away at anything they want....what do other nations think of possibly crippling the moon should the explosion be too big.What about this supposed crash into the earth , is this why they are really trying to nudge the moon off its course...What if they had discovered something up on the moon , and wanted to destroy it ( such as aliens ) before we found out about it , or any other country ( China ) were to set foot on the moon , maybe there was an agreement with an alien life form to not divulge its existence to humankind.What if this is really a ploy to hide the fact that we never went up to the moon , and by somehow disturbing or destroying the moons surface enough , to change any markers ( footprints ) left behind by our astronauts ( supposedly ) , they would never prove otherwisethat we never REALLY set foot on the moon , and that the whole thing was staged.What if this back fires , and destroys the moon in half , and changes our whole magnetic field caused by the moon 's pull , could we see a chaotic future with anarchy running a muck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they even have the right to just blast away at anything they want....what do other nations think of possibly crippling the moon should the explosion be too big.What about this supposed crash into the earth, is this why they are really trying to nudge the moon off its course...What if they had discovered something up on the moon, and wanted to destroy it (such as aliens) before we found out about it, or any other country (China) were to set foot on the moon, maybe there was an agreement with an alien life form to not divulge its existence to humankind.What if this is really a ploy to hide the fact that we never went up to the moon, and by somehow disturbing or destroying the moons surface enough, to change any markers (footprints) left behind by our astronauts (supposedly), they would never prove otherwisethat we never REALLY set foot on the moon, and that the whole thing was staged.What if this back fires, and destroys the moon in half, and changes our whole magnetic field caused by the moon's pull, could we see a chaotic future with anarchy running a muck?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349635</id>
	<title>Global warming</title>
	<author>electrosoccertux</author>
	<datestamp>1245175380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon? There's plenty on this planet. I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.</p></div><p>Making ice on earth wastes energy and causes global warming, you insensitive clod!!! We need to put some weight behind sustainability in ice creation. We can't afford to keep spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to fuel our frivolous, wasteful American consumption! Better to get it from somewhere else! I have gone without ice for as long as I can remember, and you should, too, in fact I'm going to pass a law that says you have to live like me and give up your wasteful ice consuming habits!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in a financial crisis , and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon ?
There 's plenty on this planet .
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.Making ice on earth wastes energy and causes global warming , you insensitive clod ! ! !
We need to put some weight behind sustainability in ice creation .
We ca n't afford to keep spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to fuel our frivolous , wasteful American consumption !
Better to get it from somewhere else !
I have gone without ice for as long as I can remember , and you should , too , in fact I 'm going to pass a law that says you have to live like me and give up your wasteful ice consuming habits !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon?
There's plenty on this planet.
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.Making ice on earth wastes energy and causes global warming, you insensitive clod!!!
We need to put some weight behind sustainability in ice creation.
We can't afford to keep spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to fuel our frivolous, wasteful American consumption!
Better to get it from somewhere else!
I have gone without ice for as long as I can remember, and you should, too, in fact I'm going to pass a law that says you have to live like me and give up your wasteful ice consuming habits!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348857</id>
	<title>Mythbusters in Space</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1245172860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA should recruit them.  They'd be the experts on triggering massive explosions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA should recruit them .
They 'd be the experts on triggering massive explosions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA should recruit them.
They'd be the experts on triggering massive explosions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351847</id>
	<title>Fiscally responsible?</title>
	<author>SilverJets</author>
	<datestamp>1245182820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.</i></p><p>Really?  Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do?  How about about not littering the moon's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water?  Oh, wait that will cost more money.   Hmmm....looks like history is repeating itself here and we are going to litter and pollute everywhere we go simply because it is cheaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.Really ?
Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do ?
How about about not littering the moon 's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water ?
Oh , wait that will cost more money .
Hmmm....looks like history is repeating itself here and we are going to litter and pollute everywhere we go simply because it is cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.Really?
Slamming garbage into the surface of the moon is the fiscally responsible thing to do?
How about about not littering the moon's surface with debris and send a probe to search for water?
Oh, wait that will cost more money.
Hmmm....looks like history is repeating itself here and we are going to litter and pollute everywhere we go simply because it is cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349121</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1245173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11aug\_lcross.htm</p><p>Equivalent to 2000 pounds of TNT. That's less than a bunker buster bomb carried by an F15. The moons been hit by stuff a lot more powerful, like the enormous asteroids that made the 1000-mile craters you can see without a telescope.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11aug \ _lcross.htmEquivalent to 2000 pounds of TNT .
That 's less than a bunker buster bomb carried by an F15 .
The moons been hit by stuff a lot more powerful , like the enormous asteroids that made the 1000-mile craters you can see without a telescope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11aug\_lcross.htmEquivalent to 2000 pounds of TNT.
That's less than a bunker buster bomb carried by an F15.
The moons been hit by stuff a lot more powerful, like the enormous asteroids that made the 1000-mile craters you can see without a telescope.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351925</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245183180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's nothing, in Jack Vance's "The Face" a villain tries to blow away parts of a moon in such a way that the end result will resemble his face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing , in Jack Vance 's " The Face " a villain tries to blow away parts of a moon in such a way that the end result will resemble his face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing, in Jack Vance's "The Face" a villain tries to blow away parts of a moon in such a way that the end result will resemble his face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349067</id>
	<title>Can it be viewed through a telescope?</title>
	<author>kalpol</author>
	<datestamp>1245173460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it be possible to watch through binoculars or a telescope?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it be possible to watch through binoculars or a telescope ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it be possible to watch through binoculars or a telescope?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351003</id>
	<title>Solution to global warming?</title>
	<author>californication</author>
	<datestamp>1245179700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1)  Find ice on the moon.<br>
2)  Harvest so-called ice as giant cubes.<br>
3)  Parody popular animated sci-fi comedy show.<br>
4)  ?????<br>
5)  Profit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Find ice on the moon .
2 ) Harvest so-called ice as giant cubes .
3 ) Parody popular animated sci-fi comedy show .
4 ) ? ? ? ? ?
5 ) Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1)  Find ice on the moon.
2)  Harvest so-called ice as giant cubes.
3)  Parody popular animated sci-fi comedy show.
4)  ?????
5)  Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351393</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245181260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, if sending water is so expensive, why not just make them drink their own pee?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , if sending water is so expensive , why not just make them drink their own pee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, if sending water is so expensive, why not just make them drink their own pee?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353589</id>
	<title>Re:I hope everyone is learning an important lesson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wait... the pinto didn't blow up on its own?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wait... the pinto did n't blow up on its own ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wait... the pinto didn't blow up on its own?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349053</id>
	<title>um really?</title>
	<author>greymond</author>
	<datestamp>1245173400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they are going to blow the moon up... this... this just seems like a bad idea and something I read in a book...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they are going to blow the moon up... this... this just seems like a bad idea and something I read in a book.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they are going to blow the moon up... this... this just seems like a bad idea and something I read in a book...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349949</id>
	<title>The Time Machine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245176340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't anyone read HG Wells? This is how trouble starts!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't anyone read HG Wells ?
This is how trouble starts !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't anyone read HG Wells?
This is how trouble starts!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349131</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Emb3rz</author>
	<datestamp>1245173700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't think much thought has been put in this by NASA.</p></div><p>Lol.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think much thought has been put in this by NASA.Lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think much thought has been put in this by NASA.Lol.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349935</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1245176220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up *here* before we start blowing everything up elsewhere?</p></div><p>Hell no!  There's a whole lot more elsewhere than there is here.  I say we ban all explosions on the earth until we have blown the rest of the Universe up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up * here * before we start blowing everything up elsewhere ? Hell no !
There 's a whole lot more elsewhere than there is here .
I say we ban all explosions on the earth until we have blown the rest of the Universe up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up *here* before we start blowing everything up elsewhere?Hell no!
There's a whole lot more elsewhere than there is here.
I say we ban all explosions on the earth until we have blown the rest of the Universe up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352383</id>
	<title>WAR!</title>
	<author>airship</author>
	<datestamp>1245185040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great! Now we have to prepare for retaliation by Moon Nazis!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Now we have to prepare for retaliation by Moon Nazis !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Now we have to prepare for retaliation by Moon Nazis!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349169</id>
	<title>This means war</title>
	<author>CustomDesigned</author>
	<datestamp>1245173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfiortunately, the advanced civilization living peaceably beneath the surface for millennia, will suddenly begin arming for war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfiortunately , the advanced civilization living peaceably beneath the surface for millennia , will suddenly begin arming for war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfiortunately, the advanced civilization living peaceably beneath the surface for millennia, will suddenly begin arming for war.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349155</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me you are joking. The moon is *NOT* a light object in any scale NASA can significantly affect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me you are joking .
The moon is * NOT * a light object in any scale NASA can significantly affect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me you are joking.
The moon is *NOT* a light object in any scale NASA can significantly affect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348863</id>
	<title>Visible</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1245172860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoa, will this be visble from Earth? That would rock!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoa , will this be visble from Earth ?
That would rock !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoa, will this be visble from Earth?
That would rock!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352217</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>Ecuador</author>
	<datestamp>1245184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Best title theme ever. Alternating between a dithyrambic classical score and the funkiest 70's dance beat. I was too young to appreciate it when I was watching the show in my early teens, I am not to old to appreciate the rest...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best title theme ever .
Alternating between a dithyrambic classical score and the funkiest 70 's dance beat .
I was too young to appreciate it when I was watching the show in my early teens , I am not to old to appreciate the rest... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best title theme ever.
Alternating between a dithyrambic classical score and the funkiest 70's dance beat.
I was too young to appreciate it when I was watching the show in my early teens, I am not to old to appreciate the rest... ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350035</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>mdsharpe</author>
	<datestamp>1245176520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's just hope the Moon isn't *actually* made of cheese</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just hope the Moon is n't * actually * made of cheese</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just hope the Moon isn't *actually* made of cheese</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350717</id>
	<title>Take that Japan</title>
	<author>ezwip</author>
	<datestamp>1245178680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have no doubt that we faked the moon landing. Blowing a chunk out of it is just our way of telling others to back off. That's just how we roll in America. If your nation wants to land there first we're gonna blow you up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no doubt that we faked the moon landing .
Blowing a chunk out of it is just our way of telling others to back off .
That 's just how we roll in America .
If your nation wants to land there first we 're gon na blow you up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no doubt that we faked the moon landing.
Blowing a chunk out of it is just our way of telling others to back off.
That's just how we roll in America.
If your nation wants to land there first we're gonna blow you up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350113</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>TypoNAM</author>
	<datestamp>1245176820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcm-J7lQT3w" title="youtube.com">Spoon!</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoon !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoon!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349577</id>
	<title>Re:Visible</title>
	<author>sentientbeing</author>
	<datestamp>1245175140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes its that big shiny disk thingy with the face that you can sometimes at night.<br> <br>Oh. You mean the <i>explosion</i>?<br> <br>Dunno.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes its that big shiny disk thingy with the face that you can sometimes at night .
Oh. You mean the explosion ?
Dunno .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes its that big shiny disk thingy with the face that you can sometimes at night.
Oh. You mean the explosion?
Dunno.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354983</id>
	<title>Actually 6.214 miles?</title>
	<author>vikstar</author>
	<datestamp>1245153720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm willing to be that they are attempting a 6.214 mile high explosion. Why? Because that is 10km. Good to see NASA using a civilized measurement system, too bad the press/media doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm willing to be that they are attempting a 6.214 mile high explosion .
Why ? Because that is 10km .
Good to see NASA using a civilized measurement system , too bad the press/media does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm willing to be that they are attempting a 6.214 mile high explosion.
Why? Because that is 10km.
Good to see NASA using a civilized measurement system, too bad the press/media doesn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349179</id>
	<title>Re:Queue all the anti-war nutjobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think we've just run out of places on earth to look for Osama Bin Laden</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we 've just run out of places on earth to look for Osama Bin Laden</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we've just run out of places on earth to look for Osama Bin Laden</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354859</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245153060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To anybody who doesn't get this, it's a reference to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Tick\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">The Tick</a> [wikipedia.org], a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation. In one of the episodes, a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon. For some reason. I seem to remember that later in the series, you can still see the partially written word "Chairface" in the moon.</p><p>My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot. He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal. Nice.</p></div><p>Wrong, it's from Mr. Show with Bob and David.  It's a direct quote from that sketch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To anybody who does n't get this , it 's a reference to The Tick [ wikipedia.org ] , a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation .
In one of the episodes , a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon .
For some reason .
I seem to remember that later in the series , you can still see the partially written word " Chairface " in the moon.My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and , for some reason , has to fight a version of himself made out of snot .
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal .
Nice.Wrong , it 's from Mr. Show with Bob and David .
It 's a direct quote from that sketch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To anybody who doesn't get this, it's a reference to The Tick [wikipedia.org], a brilliant super-hero/spoof TV animation.
In one of the episodes, a super-villain called Chairface Chippendale tries to write his name on the moon.
For some reason.
I seem to remember that later in the series, you can still see the partially written word "Chairface" in the moon.My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot.
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal.
Nice.Wrong, it's from Mr. Show with Bob and David.
It's a direct quote from that sketch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353193</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245145020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well..</p><p>The mission has already been paid for. Canceling it now to "save money" would be monumentally stupid, and would the best way to insure that all the money was wasted...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well..The mission has already been paid for .
Canceling it now to " save money " would be monumentally stupid , and would the best way to insure that all the money was wasted.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well..The mission has already been paid for.
Canceling it now to "save money" would be monumentally stupid, and would the best way to insure that all the money was wasted...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349279</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>TrevorB</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Susan?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Susan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Susan?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359627</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Stud McPeckChest</author>
	<datestamp>1245240600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot. He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal. Nice.</p></div></blockquote><p>

The Tick had to fight a clone of himself that Thrakkorzog made out of a tissue sample. Since the Tick is nigh-invulnerable Thrakkorzog had to obtain that tissue sample from one of Tick's actual discarded tissues. He eventually beat the clone mucous version of himself by inhaling it.
</p><p>
That was a brilliant cartoon. I remember that as one of the first episodes I watched. The Tick had to run an extension cord up to the roof to power the device to send Thrakkorzog back to his own universe. I remember watching it and thinking "This would be the greatest cartoon ever if the plan failed because he needed a three-pronged adapter." Sure enough, it was the greatest cartoon ever.
</p><p>
I like cartoons too much
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and , for some reason , has to fight a version of himself made out of snot .
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal .
Nice . The Tick had to fight a clone of himself that Thrakkorzog made out of a tissue sample .
Since the Tick is nigh-invulnerable Thrakkorzog had to obtain that tissue sample from one of Tick 's actual discarded tissues .
He eventually beat the clone mucous version of himself by inhaling it .
That was a brilliant cartoon .
I remember that as one of the first episodes I watched .
The Tick had to run an extension cord up to the roof to power the device to send Thrakkorzog back to his own universe .
I remember watching it and thinking " This would be the greatest cartoon ever if the plan failed because he needed a three-pronged adapter .
" Sure enough , it was the greatest cartoon ever .
I like cartoons too much</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favourite Tick episode is where he gets flu and, for some reason, has to fight a version of himself made out of snot.
He wins by snorting it into himself and sneezing it into a dimensional portal.
Nice.

The Tick had to fight a clone of himself that Thrakkorzog made out of a tissue sample.
Since the Tick is nigh-invulnerable Thrakkorzog had to obtain that tissue sample from one of Tick's actual discarded tissues.
He eventually beat the clone mucous version of himself by inhaling it.
That was a brilliant cartoon.
I remember that as one of the first episodes I watched.
The Tick had to run an extension cord up to the roof to power the device to send Thrakkorzog back to his own universe.
I remember watching it and thinking "This would be the greatest cartoon ever if the plan failed because he needed a three-pronged adapter.
" Sure enough, it was the greatest cartoon ever.
I like cartoons too much

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360265</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245246420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, I learn a lot more from Mythbusters than I do from Nasa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I learn a lot more from Mythbusters than I do from Nasa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I learn a lot more from Mythbusters than I do from Nasa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350653</id>
	<title>Um, wasn't this done already?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1245178500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seem to remember that the Chinese or some other nationality already did this? If I remember correctly they made a spacecraft or probe that was specially designed to smash into surface of the moon, penetrate as deep as possible and eject material so that it could be analyzed for content...specifically for ice.</p><p>So what is NASA's twist? Just a big rocket?</p><p>I say, go to the next level, the US has plenty of high tech conventional explosive ordinance just hanging around, lets try something special. Heck for extra points, launch a mini-nuke, and set it off on impact.</p><p>I guess the concern here would be if the rocket failed you may have it go down over something important on earth like a city or something, which could cause some complications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to remember that the Chinese or some other nationality already did this ?
If I remember correctly they made a spacecraft or probe that was specially designed to smash into surface of the moon , penetrate as deep as possible and eject material so that it could be analyzed for content...specifically for ice.So what is NASA 's twist ?
Just a big rocket ? I say , go to the next level , the US has plenty of high tech conventional explosive ordinance just hanging around , lets try something special .
Heck for extra points , launch a mini-nuke , and set it off on impact.I guess the concern here would be if the rocket failed you may have it go down over something important on earth like a city or something , which could cause some complications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to remember that the Chinese or some other nationality already did this?
If I remember correctly they made a spacecraft or probe that was specially designed to smash into surface of the moon, penetrate as deep as possible and eject material so that it could be analyzed for content...specifically for ice.So what is NASA's twist?
Just a big rocket?I say, go to the next level, the US has plenty of high tech conventional explosive ordinance just hanging around, lets try something special.
Heck for extra points, launch a mini-nuke, and set it off on impact.I guess the concern here would be if the rocket failed you may have it go down over something important on earth like a city or something, which could cause some complications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28355327</id>
	<title>where do they come up with this crap!?</title>
	<author>jisou</author>
	<datestamp>1245155520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>how did they even begin to think about this? a couple of NASA scientists where sitting around at a board meting then all of a sudden say "hey we've got a couple extra billions lets check the moon for water!" "but how do we do that?" "uh....with an explosion<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D".</htmltext>
<tokenext>how did they even begin to think about this ?
a couple of NASA scientists where sitting around at a board meting then all of a sudden say " hey we 've got a couple extra billions lets check the moon for water !
" " but how do we do that ?
" " uh....with an explosion : D " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how did they even begin to think about this?
a couple of NASA scientists where sitting around at a board meting then all of a sudden say "hey we've got a couple extra billions lets check the moon for water!
" "but how do we do that?
" "uh....with an explosion :D".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349687</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1245175500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sept 13, 1999. Ten years and a few days late. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space:1999" title="wikipedia.org">Space:1999</a> [wikipedia.org]</p> </div><p>Ah, beat me to it! I was going to speculate regarding the whereabouts of Martin Landau and Barbara Bain during all this...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sept 13 , 1999 .
Ten years and a few days late .
Space : 1999 [ wikipedia.org ] Ah , beat me to it !
I was going to speculate regarding the whereabouts of Martin Landau and Barbara Bain during all this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sept 13, 1999.
Ten years and a few days late.
Space:1999 [wikipedia.org] Ah, beat me to it!
I was going to speculate regarding the whereabouts of Martin Landau and Barbara Bain during all this...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</id>
	<title>Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um.. what if they knock the moon off orbit or do something stupid like alter the tides on Earth by the massive amount of surface area missing.  I don't think much though has been put in this by NASA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um.. what if they knock the moon off orbit or do something stupid like alter the tides on Earth by the massive amount of surface area missing .
I do n't think much though has been put in this by NASA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.. what if they knock the moon off orbit or do something stupid like alter the tides on Earth by the massive amount of surface area missing.
I don't think much though has been put in this by NASA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28363767</id>
	<title>Re:Shock and Awe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245264300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD's on the moon.</p></div><p>Actually they <i>told us</i> they have WMDs on the moon, but now won't show them to us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD 's on the moon.Actually they told us they have WMDs on the moon , but now wo n't show them to us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our intelligence is that they are storing WMD's on the moon.Actually they told us they have WMDs on the moon, but now won't show them to us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352459</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>No2Gates</author>
	<datestamp>1245185280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, it was for Lunar Leisure Living, a colony on the moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , it was for Lunar Leisure Living , a colony on the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, it was for Lunar Leisure Living, a colony on the moon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349091</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245173580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are preparing, apparently, for when we have blown everything up here and need somewhere else to go. But actually I think this is part of NASA's 'constant contact' plan, like the election, when McCain kept saying outrageous stuff just to keep himself in the news. I have been leery of NASA since they did their horrendously offensive dog-and-pony show about the Martian meteorite/life on Mars thing. Does the moon belong to us? Do we have the right to blow it up? It seems like an expensive schoolboy stunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are preparing , apparently , for when we have blown everything up here and need somewhere else to go .
But actually I think this is part of NASA 's 'constant contact ' plan , like the election , when McCain kept saying outrageous stuff just to keep himself in the news .
I have been leery of NASA since they did their horrendously offensive dog-and-pony show about the Martian meteorite/life on Mars thing .
Does the moon belong to us ?
Do we have the right to blow it up ?
It seems like an expensive schoolboy stunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are preparing, apparently, for when we have blown everything up here and need somewhere else to go.
But actually I think this is part of NASA's 'constant contact' plan, like the election, when McCain kept saying outrageous stuff just to keep himself in the news.
I have been leery of NASA since they did their horrendously offensive dog-and-pony show about the Martian meteorite/life on Mars thing.
Does the moon belong to us?
Do we have the right to blow it up?
It seems like an expensive schoolboy stunt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359309</id>
	<title>Re:I hope everyone is learning an important lesson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245236220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was the radiator broken?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was the radiator broken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was the radiator broken?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28363415</id>
	<title>Sadly...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245262920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Today NASA discovered life on the moon!!  In a revelation to scientists, the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite detected signs of life that doesn't depend on an atmosphere.  This discovery was heralded as the single most important discovery in man's history.  The discovery allows for possibility of life anywhere water is found, no matter the temperature or atmospheric conditions and opens up the possibility of a universe teeming with life.</p><p>Sadly, all traces of the life form were vaporized 0.0005s after mission cameras first caught glimpse of the revelation.  Mission scientists are now busy planning to blow up Mars to see if life exists there as well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today NASA discovered life on the moon ! !
In a revelation to scientists , the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite detected signs of life that does n't depend on an atmosphere .
This discovery was heralded as the single most important discovery in man 's history .
The discovery allows for possibility of life anywhere water is found , no matter the temperature or atmospheric conditions and opens up the possibility of a universe teeming with life.Sadly , all traces of the life form were vaporized 0.0005s after mission cameras first caught glimpse of the revelation .
Mission scientists are now busy planning to blow up Mars to see if life exists there as well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today NASA discovered life on the moon!!
In a revelation to scientists, the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite detected signs of life that doesn't depend on an atmosphere.
This discovery was heralded as the single most important discovery in man's history.
The discovery allows for possibility of life anywhere water is found, no matter the temperature or atmospheric conditions and opens up the possibility of a universe teeming with life.Sadly, all traces of the life form were vaporized 0.0005s after mission cameras first caught glimpse of the revelation.
Mission scientists are now busy planning to blow up Mars to see if life exists there as well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350501</id>
	<title>Moon is moving away from Earth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Moon is moving away from Earth about 1cm per year.  Perhaps they could nudge it a little to lesson the escape?</p><p>When the moon leaves Earth, tides will stop and many, many life forms will have trouble.  Heck, women cycle every 28 days because of the moon.  We are physical creatures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Moon is moving away from Earth about 1cm per year .
Perhaps they could nudge it a little to lesson the escape ? When the moon leaves Earth , tides will stop and many , many life forms will have trouble .
Heck , women cycle every 28 days because of the moon .
We are physical creatures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Moon is moving away from Earth about 1cm per year.
Perhaps they could nudge it a little to lesson the escape?When the moon leaves Earth, tides will stop and many, many life forms will have trouble.
Heck, women cycle every 28 days because of the moon.
We are physical creatures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mythbusters was NEVER devoted to scientific inquiry. Using the terms 'control group' and 'data' twenty times an episode does not a scientist make. Infotainment at best.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mythbusters was NEVER devoted to scientific inquiry .
Using the terms 'control group ' and 'data ' twenty times an episode does not a scientist make .
Infotainment at best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mythbusters was NEVER devoted to scientific inquiry.
Using the terms 'control group' and 'data' twenty times an episode does not a scientist make.
Infotainment at best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351293</id>
	<title>blew moon</title>
	<author>mallmall</author>
	<datestamp>1245180960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just hope they do it during a full moon - so they make sure and get it all.</p><p><a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1c81d0df12/mr-show-america-blows-up-the-moon-from-thaffner" title="funnyordie.com" rel="nofollow">Mr. Show - America Blows Up The Moon</a> [funnyordie.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope they do it during a full moon - so they make sure and get it all.Mr .
Show - America Blows Up The Moon [ funnyordie.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope they do it during a full moon - so they make sure and get it all.Mr.
Show - America Blows Up The Moon [funnyordie.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350447</id>
	<title>That's no moon</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1245177900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's no moon, it's a target.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's no moon , it 's a target .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's no moon, it's a target.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28361843</id>
	<title>Ask v Apologize</title>
	<author>PMuse</author>
	<datestamp>1245255240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Out of curiosity, has anyone outside the States offered an opinion on what the U.S.N.A.S.A. is doing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of curiosity , has anyone outside the States offered an opinion on what the U.S.N.A.S.A .
is doing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of curiosity, has anyone outside the States offered an opinion on what the U.S.N.A.S.A.
is doing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348939</id>
	<title>Might have to send along a few Playboy issues...</title>
	<author>olsmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1245173040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA, "For Kimberly Ennico, the LCROSS payload scientist, those worries are focused on a critical moment less than two hours into the mission, when controllers will signal the spacecraft to turn itself on."</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA , " For Kimberly Ennico , the LCROSS payload scientist , those worries are focused on a critical moment less than two hours into the mission , when controllers will signal the spacecraft to turn itself on .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA, "For Kimberly Ennico, the LCROSS payload scientist, those worries are focused on a critical moment less than two hours into the mission, when controllers will signal the spacecraft to turn itself on.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351475</id>
	<title>Sure hope they do it on the far side</title>
	<author>gringofrijolero</author>
	<datestamp>1245181560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might slow down the speed at which it is <a href="http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;id=2195" title="astronomy.com" rel="nofollow">moving away</a> [astronomy.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might slow down the speed at which it is moving away [ astronomy.com ] : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might slow down the speed at which it is moving away [astronomy.com] :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348925</id>
	<title>Just great!</title>
	<author>Hitman\_Frost</author>
	<datestamp>1245172980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait to hear what the crackpots over on Youtube are going to make of *that* experiment.</p><p>Will it be "NASA attacks alien city on the Moon"?</p><p>Or some nonsense about reptilians / greys / 2012 / Planet-X / NWO / Morgellons / HAARP / chemtrails, etc, etc.</p><p>Only time will tell. All we really know is that it will be unbelievably stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to hear what the crackpots over on Youtube are going to make of * that * experiment.Will it be " NASA attacks alien city on the Moon " ? Or some nonsense about reptilians / greys / 2012 / Planet-X / NWO / Morgellons / HAARP / chemtrails , etc , etc.Only time will tell .
All we really know is that it will be unbelievably stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to hear what the crackpots over on Youtube are going to make of *that* experiment.Will it be "NASA attacks alien city on the Moon"?Or some nonsense about reptilians / greys / 2012 / Planet-X / NWO / Morgellons / HAARP / chemtrails, etc, etc.Only time will tell.
All we really know is that it will be unbelievably stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</id>
	<title>Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up *here* before we start blowing everything up elsewhere?</htmltext>
<tokenext>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up * here * before we start blowing everything up elsewhere ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>am I the only one who thinks we should blow everything up *here* before we start blowing everything up elsewhere?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356917</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1245166140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget, Cobra Commander tried it too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget , Cobra Commander tried it too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget, Cobra Commander tried it too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349521</id>
	<title>Re:I hope everyone is learning an important lesson</title>
	<author>Sabz5150</author>
	<datestamp>1245174900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if "there is water there."</p><p>For instance, I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there.' It was moist, leading me to believe that there is, in fact, water in there. Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not, in fact, "water in there." As I suspected, there wasn't.</p></div><p>You blew up the wrong Pinto.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if " there is water there .
" For instance , I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there .
' It was moist , leading me to believe that there is , in fact , water in there .
Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not , in fact , " water in there .
" As I suspected , there was n't.You blew up the wrong Pinto .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's ok to blow things up if you just want to know if "there is water there.
"For instance, I just blew up a watermelon 'to see if there was water in there.
' It was moist, leading me to believe that there is, in fact, water in there.
Then I blew up a junk yard Ford Pinto so I could verify that there was not, in fact, "water in there.
" As I suspected, there wasn't.You blew up the wrong Pinto.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349891</id>
	<title>Re:Cheese?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1245176160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, bu t the video of the impact will be edited for a new Cheez-It commercial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , bu t the video of the impact will be edited for a new Cheez-It commercial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, bu t the video of the impact will be edited for a new Cheez-It commercial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358571</id>
	<title>Usual Suspect</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245270120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>America's answer to everything<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... blow the fucker up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</htmltext>
<tokenext>America 's answer to everything ... blow the fucker up : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America's answer to everything ... blow the fucker up :-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350341</id>
	<title>I'm bored let's blow something up.</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1245177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel like this is at the end of a episode of Myth Busters where they can't get something to work so they just blow it up. We can't find water on the Moon so let's just blow some of it up instead. Waste of money when the economy is in the tank...I'm glad we have our priorities in the right place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel like this is at the end of a episode of Myth Busters where they ca n't get something to work so they just blow it up .
We ca n't find water on the Moon so let 's just blow some of it up instead .
Waste of money when the economy is in the tank...I 'm glad we have our priorities in the right place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel like this is at the end of a episode of Myth Busters where they can't get something to work so they just blow it up.
We can't find water on the Moon so let's just blow some of it up instead.
Waste of money when the economy is in the tank...I'm glad we have our priorities in the right place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350601</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>brock bitumen</author>
	<datestamp>1245178320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>calm down.
<p>
These things don't run on short term timescales.  This project completed it's <i>design review phase</i> (suggesting many months of <i>design</i> prior to that) in February '06, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCROSS" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">see the citations on the project's wikipedia page</a> [wikipedia.org]
</p><p>
The economy was doing just fine, in fact very well, until about halloween of 2008.  We're not just going to dump this mission b/c the banks are having a rough spot.  The money is spent, the project has inertia too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>calm down .
These things do n't run on short term timescales .
This project completed it 's design review phase ( suggesting many months of design prior to that ) in February '06 , see the citations on the project 's wikipedia page [ wikipedia.org ] The economy was doing just fine , in fact very well , until about halloween of 2008 .
We 're not just going to dump this mission b/c the banks are having a rough spot .
The money is spent , the project has inertia too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>calm down.
These things don't run on short term timescales.
This project completed it's design review phase (suggesting many months of design prior to that) in February '06, see the citations on the project's wikipedia page [wikipedia.org]

The economy was doing just fine, in fact very well, until about halloween of 2008.
We're not just going to dump this mission b/c the banks are having a rough spot.
The money is spent, the project has inertia too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349545</id>
	<title>Re:One sixth the gravity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Less atmosphere too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Less atmosphere too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Less atmosphere too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353789</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>nospam007</author>
	<datestamp>1245147360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you know, the Moon is a harsh mistress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you know , the Moon is a harsh mistress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you know, the Moon is a harsh mistress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349305</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>blow everything up</p></div><p>That opening scene in 2001 with the apes smashing the cr*p out of everything is just so apropos to the human 'being'...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>blow everything upThat opening scene in 2001 with the apes smashing the cr * p out of everything is just so apropos to the human 'being'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blow everything upThat opening scene in 2001 with the apes smashing the cr*p out of everything is just so apropos to the human 'being'...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349247</id>
	<title>Delayed</title>
	<author>GweeDo</author>
	<datestamp>1245174060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The launch has been delayed since Endeavor wasn't able to launch on Saturday as planned.  Endeavor is currently slated to launch tomorrow to ISS and a new date hasn't been picked for this mission.<br>
<a href="http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/090616-sts127-launch-preview.html" title="space.com">Story here</a> [space.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The launch has been delayed since Endeavor was n't able to launch on Saturday as planned .
Endeavor is currently slated to launch tomorrow to ISS and a new date has n't been picked for this mission .
Story here [ space.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The launch has been delayed since Endeavor wasn't able to launch on Saturday as planned.
Endeavor is currently slated to launch tomorrow to ISS and a new date hasn't been picked for this mission.
Story here [space.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358765</id>
	<title>Re:Cheese?</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1245272340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure it's something closely resembling Wensleydale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure it 's something closely resembling Wensleydale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure it's something closely resembling Wensleydale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354961</id>
	<title>Re:Shock and Awe...</title>
	<author>Mick R</author>
	<datestamp>1245153660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You made me snort out loud!

Seriously though, they did check that this isn't going to degrade the moon's orbit and drop it to Earth in 20 years?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You made me snort out loud !
Seriously though , they did check that this is n't going to degrade the moon 's orbit and drop it to Earth in 20 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You made me snort out loud!
Seriously though, they did check that this isn't going to degrade the moon's orbit and drop it to Earth in 20 years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353575</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>wgoodman</author>
	<datestamp>1245146520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i <a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=1522#comic" title="smbc-comics.com" rel="nofollow">knew</a> [smbc-comics.com] it was going to happen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i knew [ smbc-comics.com ] it was going to happen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i knew [smbc-comics.com] it was going to happen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349315</id>
	<title>Nuke it from orbit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's the only way to be sure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354929</id>
	<title>Visible from North America</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245153420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So no one else will be able to see the plume then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So no one else will be able to see the plume then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So no one else will be able to see the plume then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357387</id>
	<title>Mr. Show</title>
	<author>strags</author>
	<datestamp>1245170280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>"Lookout Moon, America's gonna getcha -<br>gonna go kaboom - was nice to have met ya -<br>'cos ya don't mess around with God's America!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Csj7vMKy4EI [ youtube.com ] " Lookout Moon , America 's gon na getcha -gon na go kaboom - was nice to have met ya -'cos ya do n't mess around with God 's America !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI [youtube.com]"Lookout Moon, America's gonna getcha -gonna go kaboom - was nice to have met ya -'cos ya don't mess around with God's America!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349231</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>H0p313ss</author>
	<datestamp>1245174000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...</p></div><p>What mythbusters proves is that being curious can be fun... especially if you have a budget and an explosives license.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>SO , NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...What mythbusters proves is that being curious can be fun... especially if you have a budget and an explosives license .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> SO, NASA is going the way of Mythbusters - from an organization devoted to scientific inquiry into one that just blows things up for kicks...What mythbusters proves is that being curious can be fun... especially if you have a budget and an explosives license.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356017</id>
	<title>What in the fuck?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245159600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this fails and costs thousands of lives at Nasa.</p><p>6 Mile High Explosion?</p><p>I can't wait for human fucking extinction.</p><p>Stupid fucking morons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this fails and costs thousands of lives at Nasa.6 Mile High Explosion ? I ca n't wait for human fucking extinction.Stupid fucking morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this fails and costs thousands of lives at Nasa.6 Mile High Explosion?I can't wait for human fucking extinction.Stupid fucking morons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350285</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>jamstar7</author>
	<datestamp>1245177360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finding ice on the Moon is a step closer to colonisation.  There's a lot of materials on the Moon, but utilising them would take a colony. You can only do so much with teleoperated machines due to the communications lag. Sure, it's spending money <b>now</b> for a payoff <b>later</b>, but think of the tax money rakeoffs from colonial products, and think of the money saved by <b>not</b> having to lift every gram off Earth at a cost of thousands of dollars per pound.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finding ice on the Moon is a step closer to colonisation .
There 's a lot of materials on the Moon , but utilising them would take a colony .
You can only do so much with teleoperated machines due to the communications lag .
Sure , it 's spending money now for a payoff later , but think of the tax money rakeoffs from colonial products , and think of the money saved by not having to lift every gram off Earth at a cost of thousands of dollars per pound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finding ice on the Moon is a step closer to colonisation.
There's a lot of materials on the Moon, but utilising them would take a colony.
You can only do so much with teleoperated machines due to the communications lag.
Sure, it's spending money now for a payoff later, but think of the tax money rakeoffs from colonial products, and think of the money saved by not having to lift every gram off Earth at a cost of thousands of dollars per pound.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359449</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Shadowmist</author>
	<datestamp>1245238560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could still see it because the  animated show  had an uncommon feature of continuity.  Months later the Tick was sent to the Moon to fill in those letters.  He only got one of them done before  Ominus  (not sure of the spelling), a Galactus  spoof showed up to have Earth for dinner.  While the Tick got him to leave, he compromised by letting him have one bite of the Moon "for the road".

Episodes after that showed the moon now having  "Chi" and a bitemark out of the corner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could still see it because the animated show had an uncommon feature of continuity .
Months later the Tick was sent to the Moon to fill in those letters .
He only got one of them done before Ominus ( not sure of the spelling ) , a Galactus spoof showed up to have Earth for dinner .
While the Tick got him to leave , he compromised by letting him have one bite of the Moon " for the road " .
Episodes after that showed the moon now having " Chi " and a bitemark out of the corner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could still see it because the  animated show  had an uncommon feature of continuity.
Months later the Tick was sent to the Moon to fill in those letters.
He only got one of them done before  Ominus  (not sure of the spelling), a Galactus  spoof showed up to have Earth for dinner.
While the Tick got him to leave, he compromised by letting him have one bite of the Moon "for the road".
Episodes after that showed the moon now having  "Chi" and a bitemark out of the corner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358697</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>1stvamp</author>
	<datestamp>1245271620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI it was a comic book series before they made the animated adaptation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI it was a comic book series before they made the animated adaptation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI it was a comic book series before they made the animated adaptation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349097</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1245173580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go check out her <a href="http://www.oldsoulwakeupcalls.com/" title="oldsoulwakeupcalls.com">website</a> [oldsoulwakeupcalls.com] if you want a clue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go check out her website [ oldsoulwakeupcalls.com ] if you want a clue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go check out her website [oldsoulwakeupcalls.com] if you want a clue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351183</id>
	<title>First the moon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245180480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... then Uranus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... then Uranus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... then Uranus</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165</id>
	<title>One sixth the gravity</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the Moon has about 1/6 the gravity of Earth, this 6 mile high explosion would be about, what, 1 mile high on Earth? So that's the equivalent of a firecracker in Denver. Meh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the Moon has about 1/6 the gravity of Earth , this 6 mile high explosion would be about , what , 1 mile high on Earth ?
So that 's the equivalent of a firecracker in Denver .
Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the Moon has about 1/6 the gravity of Earth, this 6 mile high explosion would be about, what, 1 mile high on Earth?
So that's the equivalent of a firecracker in Denver.
Meh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350577</id>
	<title>Meanwhile, at the other end of the solar system...</title>
	<author>loufoque</author>
	<datestamp>1245178320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meanwhile, at the other end of the solar system, aliens prepare a missile to launch at earth to see whether there is any carbon-based life there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , at the other end of the solar system , aliens prepare a missile to launch at earth to see whether there is any carbon-based life there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, at the other end of the solar system, aliens prepare a missile to launch at earth to see whether there is any carbon-based life there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349161</id>
	<title>Massive explosion</title>
	<author>nomorecwrd</author>
	<datestamp>1245173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cosmos 2009?...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cosmos 2009 ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cosmos 2009?...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360449</id>
	<title>Uhh</title>
	<author>Canapial</author>
	<datestamp>1245247560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pbfcomics.com/archive\_b/PBF105-The\_Schlorbians\_Strike\_Again.jpg" title="pbfcomics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbfcomics.com/archive\_b/PBF105-The\_Schlorbians\_Strike\_Again.jpg</a> [pbfcomics.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.pbfcomics.com/archive \ _b/PBF105-The \ _Schlorbians \ _Strike \ _Again.jpg [ pbfcomics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.pbfcomics.com/archive\_b/PBF105-The\_Schlorbians\_Strike\_Again.jpg [pbfcomics.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349481</id>
	<title>Re:um really?</title>
	<author>ivan256</author>
	<datestamp>1245174840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of a cover I saw on one of my great-grandmother's Weekly World News tabloids when I was much younger...</p><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=wvQDAAAAMBAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=gbs\_summary\_r&amp;cad=0\_2" title="google.com">Scientists Plan To Blow Up Moon</a> [google.com].</p><p>Turns out they were right!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of a cover I saw on one of my great-grandmother 's Weekly World News tabloids when I was much younger...Scientists Plan To Blow Up Moon [ google.com ] .Turns out they were right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of a cover I saw on one of my great-grandmother's Weekly World News tabloids when I was much younger...Scientists Plan To Blow Up Moon [google.com].Turns out they were right!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28533453</id>
	<title>what if?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1246394040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what if there is really life on the moon hiding from us?<br>if we blow up their home will they return the attack<br>what if another country has astronauts up there at the time<br>what if the missle cant break through the atmosphere and returns to blow us up<br>what if they program coowarinants wrong and blow up russia! end of the world russias nuclear supply will go of with a force enough to blow up earth and the moon AND mars!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what if there is really life on the moon hiding from us ? if we blow up their home will they return the attackwhat if another country has astronauts up there at the timewhat if the missle cant break through the atmosphere and returns to blow us upwhat if they program coowarinants wrong and blow up russia !
end of the world russias nuclear supply will go of with a force enough to blow up earth and the moon AND mars !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what if there is really life on the moon hiding from us?if we blow up their home will they return the attackwhat if another country has astronauts up there at the timewhat if the missle cant break through the atmosphere and returns to blow us upwhat if they program coowarinants wrong and blow up russia!
end of the world russias nuclear supply will go of with a force enough to blow up earth and the moon AND mars!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348975</id>
	<title>Delayed</title>
	<author>JonahsDad</author>
	<datestamp>1245173100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The shuttle delay has caused this to be delayed as well. If it doesn't launch by Saturday, it'll have to wait a while.<br>
Here's a reuters article about it.<br>
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSN0313466120090615" title="reuters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSN0313466120090615</a> [reuters.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The shuttle delay has caused this to be delayed as well .
If it does n't launch by Saturday , it 'll have to wait a while .
Here 's a reuters article about it .
http : //www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSN0313466120090615 [ reuters.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The shuttle delay has caused this to be delayed as well.
If it doesn't launch by Saturday, it'll have to wait a while.
Here's a reuters article about it.
http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSN0313466120090615 [reuters.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351781</id>
	<title>Myth Buster Special?</title>
	<author>rickkw</author>
	<datestamp>1245182520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It feels like a special episode of Myth Buster that every end of episode ends with a big explosion in the name of science.  Does science and research have to be destructive?  What are the potential consequence of the explosion?

Who owns the moon?  Who gives the right to NASA to blow up a rocket in the moon?  What if North Korea wants to performance the same scientific experiment?  Will that be acceptable?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It feels like a special episode of Myth Buster that every end of episode ends with a big explosion in the name of science .
Does science and research have to be destructive ?
What are the potential consequence of the explosion ?
Who owns the moon ?
Who gives the right to NASA to blow up a rocket in the moon ?
What if North Korea wants to performance the same scientific experiment ?
Will that be acceptable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It feels like a special episode of Myth Buster that every end of episode ends with a big explosion in the name of science.
Does science and research have to be destructive?
What are the potential consequence of the explosion?
Who owns the moon?
Who gives the right to NASA to blow up a rocket in the moon?
What if North Korea wants to performance the same scientific experiment?
Will that be acceptable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352447</id>
	<title>Mooninites</title>
	<author>Kenshin</author>
	<datestamp>1245185220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might not be a good idea to anger the Mooninites. Their Quad Laser is quite an effective weapon, you know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might not be a good idea to anger the Mooninites .
Their Quad Laser is quite an effective weapon , you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might not be a good idea to anger the Mooninites.
Their Quad Laser is quite an effective weapon, you know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359263</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>MariusBoo</author>
	<datestamp>1245235560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean do we have the right? it's a very large piece of rock. If there's any use in blowing it up of course we have the right. There's no ecosystem, no nothing up there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean do we have the right ?
it 's a very large piece of rock .
If there 's any use in blowing it up of course we have the right .
There 's no ecosystem , no nothing up there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean do we have the right?
it's a very large piece of rock.
If there's any use in blowing it up of course we have the right.
There's no ecosystem, no nothing up there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350495</id>
	<title>Legal rammifications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>heck if you own one of these</p><p>http://www.lunarembassy.com/lunar/shops.lasso?-database=aa654s5677556pr&amp;-layout=US$\_pr9981\_en&amp;-response=index\_e.lasso&amp;-NoResultsError=index\_e.lasso&amp;-token.affindex=&amp;-token.trackindex=1656620&amp;-token.rn=31325830&amp;-token.cs=US$&amp;-token.rs29=33&amp;-token.rscd=LE&amp;-token.firstlogin=&amp;-token.skip=&amp;-show</p><p>you may have legal recourse for destruction of property .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>heck if you own one of thesehttp : //www.lunarembassy.com/lunar/shops.lasso ? -database = aa654s5677556pr&amp;-layout = US $ \ _pr9981 \ _en&amp;-response = index \ _e.lasso&amp;-NoResultsError = index \ _e.lasso&amp;-token.affindex = &amp;-token.trackindex = 1656620&amp;-token.rn = 31325830&amp;-token.cs = US $ &amp;-token.rs29 = 33&amp;-token.rscd = LE&amp;-token.firstlogin = &amp;-token.skip = &amp;-showyou may have legal recourse for destruction of property .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heck if you own one of thesehttp://www.lunarembassy.com/lunar/shops.lasso?-database=aa654s5677556pr&amp;-layout=US$\_pr9981\_en&amp;-response=index\_e.lasso&amp;-NoResultsError=index\_e.lasso&amp;-token.affindex=&amp;-token.trackindex=1656620&amp;-token.rn=31325830&amp;-token.cs=US$&amp;-token.rs29=33&amp;-token.rscd=LE&amp;-token.firstlogin=&amp;-token.skip=&amp;-showyou may have legal recourse for destruction of property .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349963</id>
	<title>Nostalgia.</title>
	<author>senorpoco</author>
	<datestamp>1245176340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many years from now I will fondly tell my grandchildren of the great moon in the night's sky, illuminating the earth with its pale beauty, right about where the great meteorite belt now drifts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many years from now I will fondly tell my grandchildren of the great moon in the night 's sky , illuminating the earth with its pale beauty , right about where the great meteorite belt now drifts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many years from now I will fondly tell my grandchildren of the great moon in the night's sky, illuminating the earth with its pale beauty, right about where the great meteorite belt now drifts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348893</id>
	<title>Ladies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and Gentlemen. Today, America, will blow up the Moon.</p><p>- Random clip from AMV hell 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and Gentlemen .
Today , America , will blow up the Moon.- Random clip from AMV hell 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and Gentlemen.
Today, America, will blow up the Moon.- Random clip from AMV hell 3.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353635</id>
	<title>Bombing the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245146700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The true reason is to prevent those mooners from developing WMD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The true reason is to prevent those mooners from developing WMD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The true reason is to prevent those mooners from developing WMD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349261</id>
	<title>Time Machine...</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know we aren't blasting to make way for new condos on the moon... but it sounds strangely similar to the Time Machine movie's plot in the "near" future, where we split the moon accidentally and cause mass destruction here on Earth as a result... at least I won't have to be an Eloi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know we are n't blasting to make way for new condos on the moon... but it sounds strangely similar to the Time Machine movie 's plot in the " near " future , where we split the moon accidentally and cause mass destruction here on Earth as a result... at least I wo n't have to be an Eloi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know we aren't blasting to make way for new condos on the moon... but it sounds strangely similar to the Time Machine movie's plot in the "near" future, where we split the moon accidentally and cause mass destruction here on Earth as a result... at least I won't have to be an Eloi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349817</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>Trent Hawkins</author>
	<datestamp>1245175920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't this how the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268695/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Time Machine</a> [imdb.com] movie started?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this how the Time Machine [ imdb.com ] movie started ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this how the Time Machine [imdb.com] movie started?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349683</id>
	<title>Re:Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>Khan</author>
	<datestamp>1245175440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great! Now the moon's going to be hurled out of Earth's orbit and we're going to be SCREWED as the tidal waves and earthquakes destroy our world. Did anyone at NASA even bother to watch Space:1999??!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Now the moon 's going to be hurled out of Earth 's orbit and we 're going to be SCREWED as the tidal waves and earthquakes destroy our world .
Did anyone at NASA even bother to watch Space : 1999 ? ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Now the moon's going to be hurled out of Earth's orbit and we're going to be SCREWED as the tidal waves and earthquakes destroy our world.
Did anyone at NASA even bother to watch Space:1999??
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352933</id>
	<title>Didn't Japan just do this?</title>
	<author>jcasman</author>
	<datestamp>1245144120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the difference is that they didn't create a monster explosion, but...  Japan just crash landed their "Kaguya" (SELENE) lunar orbiter into the Moon.  The Kaguya had been orbiting the Moon for 17 months since its launch in September 2007.  Strangely (to me) they are not released pictures until this November.</p><p><a href="http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2009/06/20090611\_kaguya\_e.html" title="www.jaxa.jp" rel="nofollow">http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2009/06/20090611\_kaguya\_e.html</a> [www.jaxa.jp]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the difference is that they did n't create a monster explosion , but... Japan just crash landed their " Kaguya " ( SELENE ) lunar orbiter into the Moon .
The Kaguya had been orbiting the Moon for 17 months since its launch in September 2007 .
Strangely ( to me ) they are not released pictures until this November.http : //www.jaxa.jp/press/2009/06/20090611 \ _kaguya \ _e.html [ www.jaxa.jp ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the difference is that they didn't create a monster explosion, but...  Japan just crash landed their "Kaguya" (SELENE) lunar orbiter into the Moon.
The Kaguya had been orbiting the Moon for 17 months since its launch in September 2007.
Strangely (to me) they are not released pictures until this November.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2009/06/20090611\_kaguya\_e.html [www.jaxa.jp]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825</id>
	<title>Massive lunar explosion splits moon in half</title>
	<author>ekimminau</author>
	<datestamp>1245172680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"'We're going to see something, but I don't know what to expect. I know on the night of the impact, I'll be running on adrenaline.'"
<br> <br>

And when the "massive explosion" identifies an undiscovered fault and splits the moon in half, radically changing the gravitational pull, disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern, knowing whether there is water on the moon would be deemed inconsequential.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" 'We 're going to see something , but I do n't know what to expect .
I know on the night of the impact , I 'll be running on adrenaline .
' " And when the " massive explosion " identifies an undiscovered fault and splits the moon in half , radically changing the gravitational pull , disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern , knowing whether there is water on the moon would be deemed inconsequential .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"'We're going to see something, but I don't know what to expect.
I know on the night of the impact, I'll be running on adrenaline.
'"
 

And when the "massive explosion" identifies an undiscovered fault and splits the moon in half, radically changing the gravitational pull, disrupting global tidal patterns and forever altering the global weather pattern, knowing whether there is water on the moon would be deemed inconsequential.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351825</id>
	<title>Lunar Warming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great.  Now that NASA is investing more in climate science, they're investigating lunar warming, too.  Must be the emissions from that darned lunar rover.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
Now that NASA is investing more in climate science , they 're investigating lunar warming , too .
Must be the emissions from that darned lunar rover .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
Now that NASA is investing more in climate science, they're investigating lunar warming, too.
Must be the emissions from that darned lunar rover.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349757</id>
	<title>explosion......In Search of Ice</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1245175740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody got a number for NASA?<br>
I thought I'd call and let them know that they can get ice around the corner at the quick shop for 90cents a bag.<br>
I'm just sayin'........</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody got a number for NASA ?
I thought I 'd call and let them know that they can get ice around the corner at the quick shop for 90cents a bag .
I 'm just sayin'....... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody got a number for NASA?
I thought I'd call and let them know that they can get ice around the corner at the quick shop for 90cents a bag.
I'm just sayin'........</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349281</id>
	<title>You're only supposed...</title>
	<author>plut4rch</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...to blow the bloody doors off!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to blow the bloody doors off !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to blow the bloody doors off!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354805</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245152760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hey... ouch. we were protecting democracy you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hey... ouch. we were protecting democracy you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hey... ouch. we were protecting democracy you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354193</id>
	<title>Nameplates</title>
	<author>Johnny Mnemonic</author>
	<datestamp>1245149280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have sold donor nameplates for the "lander".  Or likenesses.</p><p>I would have paid a nice dinner's worth of money to be able to send select pictures of my associates crashing into the moon, at sufficient velocity to create a 6 mile high plume.</p><p>Will this plume be visible from Earth with the naked eye?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have sold donor nameplates for the " lander " .
Or likenesses.I would have paid a nice dinner 's worth of money to be able to send select pictures of my associates crashing into the moon , at sufficient velocity to create a 6 mile high plume.Will this plume be visible from Earth with the naked eye ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have sold donor nameplates for the "lander".
Or likenesses.I would have paid a nice dinner's worth of money to be able to send select pictures of my associates crashing into the moon, at sufficient velocity to create a 6 mile high plume.Will this plume be visible from Earth with the naked eye?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349731</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>fiendy</author>
	<datestamp>1245175680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon? There's plenty on this planet. I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.</p></div><p>

Except that the government is injecting $78 million (if a subsequent poster is accurate) into the economy by funding this mission. Which would partially go to salaries of rocket builders, launch personnel etc. Which would come back into the economy through consumption of other goods. Governments around the world are clamouring for more stimulus funding to kick-start the global economy.<br> <br>
Now if you don't think the $78 million is going to get the best return on investment or the most efficient use of funds, that's another matter.<br> <br>
Yes I realize its a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. faux-pas to reply to a funny comment seriously, but 90\% of all posts are just posters trying to be funny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in a financial crisis , and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon ?
There 's plenty on this planet .
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars .
Except that the government is injecting $ 78 million ( if a subsequent poster is accurate ) into the economy by funding this mission .
Which would partially go to salaries of rocket builders , launch personnel etc .
Which would come back into the economy through consumption of other goods .
Governments around the world are clamouring for more stimulus funding to kick-start the global economy .
Now if you do n't think the $ 78 million is going to get the best return on investment or the most efficient use of funds , that 's another matter .
Yes I realize its a / .
faux-pas to reply to a funny comment seriously , but 90 \ % of all posts are just posters trying to be funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are in a financial crisis, and the government wants to see if there is ice on the moon?
There's plenty on this planet.
I can make some for you in my freezer and you can save 20 billion dollars.
Except that the government is injecting $78 million (if a subsequent poster is accurate) into the economy by funding this mission.
Which would partially go to salaries of rocket builders, launch personnel etc.
Which would come back into the economy through consumption of other goods.
Governments around the world are clamouring for more stimulus funding to kick-start the global economy.
Now if you don't think the $78 million is going to get the best return on investment or the most efficient use of funds, that's another matter.
Yes I realize its a /.
faux-pas to reply to a funny comment seriously, but 90\% of all posts are just posters trying to be funny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123</id>
	<title>Use inflammatory language much?</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1245173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ZOMG!!!! A <b>massive</b> explosion!!! A <b>six mile high</b> explosion!!!!</p><p>
Or would that actually be a very, very modest explosion (especially in astronomical terms) triggering a six mile high debris plume?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ZOMG ! ! ! !
A massive explosion ! ! !
A six mile high explosion ! ! ! !
Or would that actually be a very , very modest explosion ( especially in astronomical terms ) triggering a six mile high debris plume ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ZOMG!!!!
A massive explosion!!!
A six mile high explosion!!!!
Or would that actually be a very, very modest explosion (especially in astronomical terms) triggering a six mile high debris plume?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350937</id>
	<title>Re:NASA to blow up the moon</title>
	<author>Joe Snipe</author>
	<datestamp>1245179460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2YqGciFOmM" title="youtube.com">theme song</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the theme song [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the theme song [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349069</id>
	<title>Where did NASA</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1245173460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>come up with an Illudium PU-36 payload for that Atlas?</p><p>I hope it's a fairly small charge; I wouldn't want a Moon-shattering KABOOM!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>come up with an Illudium PU-36 payload for that Atlas ? I hope it 's a fairly small charge ; I would n't want a Moon-shattering KABOOM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>come up with an Illudium PU-36 payload for that Atlas?I hope it's a fairly small charge; I wouldn't want a Moon-shattering KABOOM!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237</id>
	<title>NASA to blow up the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Csj7vMKy4EI [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349453</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>tizan</author>
	<datestamp>1245174720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The world is always in a crisis<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...you do realize that most of the world is in poverty<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....so did that stop us from doing science, plays, movies, theaters, art, sports

So why stop now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...because a few people made stupid investments in companies run by more stupid people ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The world is always in a crisis ...you do realize that most of the world is in poverty ....so did that stop us from doing science , plays , movies , theaters , art , sports So why stop now ...because a few people made stupid investments in companies run by more stupid people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The world is always in a crisis ...you do realize that most of the world is in poverty ....so did that stop us from doing science, plays, movies, theaters, art, sports

So why stop now ...because a few people made stupid investments in companies run by more stupid people ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356985</id>
	<title>7Up already tried this...</title>
	<author>Petekill</author>
	<datestamp>1245166680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and it didn't go so well...

<a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/561211/7upp/" title="metacafe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.metacafe.com/watch/561211/7upp/</a> [metacafe.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>and it did n't go so well.. . http : //www.metacafe.com/watch/561211/7upp/ [ metacafe.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and it didn't go so well...

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/561211/7upp/ [metacafe.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349055</id>
	<title>Obligitory Quotes</title>
	<author>russlar</author>
	<datestamp>1245173400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I can confirm the location of the Moon, but I cannot confirm the <i>existence</i> of the Moon"<br> <br> <br>"That's no Moon... at least, not anymore!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I can confirm the location of the Moon , but I can not confirm the existence of the Moon " " That 's no Moon... at least , not anymore !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I can confirm the location of the Moon, but I cannot confirm the existence of the Moon"  "That's no Moon... at least, not anymore!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353969</id>
	<title>Re:Cheese?</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1245148260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss.</i></p><p>Don't be silly.  Everyone knows that it's <a href="http://wallaceandgromit.wikia.com/wiki/Wensleydale" title="wikia.com">Wensleydale</a> [wikia.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss.Do n't be silly .
Everyone knows that it 's Wensleydale [ wikia.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a sinking feeling that it will probably be Swiss.Don't be silly.
Everyone knows that it's Wensleydale [wikia.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357033</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245167100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obligatory</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatoryhttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Csj7vMKy4EI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatoryhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245175080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, to start with the mission is costing $78 million, not $20 billion.  Second, it costs $100,000 to launch one (1) gallon of water on the Shuttle.  Probably closer to $10,000 per gallon on other vehicles; but, we all know the Shuttle is expensive to operate.  Even at $10k/gal, that's still a lot of money.  So, <i>if</i> we are going to put people on the Moon, it makes no sense, economically, to send them water from Earth.  Even in high orbit of Earth, it's likely to be more cost effective, in the long run, to lift water out of the Moon's gravity well than it is to lift water out of the Earth's gravity well.  It is <i>clearly</i> the fiscally responsible thing to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , to start with the mission is costing $ 78 million , not $ 20 billion .
Second , it costs $ 100,000 to launch one ( 1 ) gallon of water on the Shuttle .
Probably closer to $ 10,000 per gallon on other vehicles ; but , we all know the Shuttle is expensive to operate .
Even at $ 10k/gal , that 's still a lot of money .
So , if we are going to put people on the Moon , it makes no sense , economically , to send them water from Earth .
Even in high orbit of Earth , it 's likely to be more cost effective , in the long run , to lift water out of the Moon 's gravity well than it is to lift water out of the Earth 's gravity well .
It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, to start with the mission is costing $78 million, not $20 billion.
Second, it costs $100,000 to launch one (1) gallon of water on the Shuttle.
Probably closer to $10,000 per gallon on other vehicles; but, we all know the Shuttle is expensive to operate.
Even at $10k/gal, that's still a lot of money.
So, if we are going to put people on the Moon, it makes no sense, economically, to send them water from Earth.
Even in high orbit of Earth, it's likely to be more cost effective, in the long run, to lift water out of the Moon's gravity well than it is to lift water out of the Earth's gravity well.
It is clearly the fiscally responsible thing to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349387</id>
	<title>Re:Raping the moon</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1245174480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the link:<p><div class="quote"><p> <b>In many traditions, including astrology, the moon represents the feminine.</b> It is the yin, the intuitive, the emotions. Women are connected to the moon by their menstrual cycles while they are fertile, and all beings, including <b>the earth herself</b>, are affected by the pull of the tides.</p></div><p>I prefer to call both Moon and Earth 'it'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the link : In many traditions , including astrology , the moon represents the feminine .
It is the yin , the intuitive , the emotions .
Women are connected to the moon by their menstrual cycles while they are fertile , and all beings , including the earth herself , are affected by the pull of the tides.I prefer to call both Moon and Earth 'it' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the link: In many traditions, including astrology, the moon represents the feminine.
It is the yin, the intuitive, the emotions.
Women are connected to the moon by their menstrual cycles while they are fertile, and all beings, including the earth herself, are affected by the pull of the tides.I prefer to call both Moon and Earth 'it'.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357215</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245168780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>George Bush is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>George Bush is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>George Bush is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356447</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>IonOtter</author>
	<datestamp>1245162780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That episode is also the only cartoon where I was both laughing hysterically and trying not to hurl my Cherrios.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That episode is also the only cartoon where I was both laughing hysterically and trying not to hurl my Cherrios .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That episode is also the only cartoon where I was both laughing hysterically and trying not to hurl my Cherrios.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360321</id>
	<title>yeeehaaawww</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245246840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fucking redneck yanks - is it not enough that you think you own the earth and go around ruining whatever beauty is left and blowing the crap out of anyone you disagree with but now you want start blowing holes in the moon?!?!?!  Did you ask any other country for permission??? No, of course not, that would be 'unamerican' (re: polite, neighbourly and decent) - for fucks sake it's not yours!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fucking redneck yanks - is it not enough that you think you own the earth and go around ruining whatever beauty is left and blowing the crap out of anyone you disagree with but now you want start blowing holes in the moon ? ! ? ! ? !
Did you ask any other country for permission ? ? ?
No , of course not , that would be 'unamerican ' ( re : polite , neighbourly and decent ) - for fucks sake it 's not yours ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fucking redneck yanks - is it not enough that you think you own the earth and go around ruining whatever beauty is left and blowing the crap out of anyone you disagree with but now you want start blowing holes in the moon?!?!?!
Did you ask any other country for permission???
No, of course not, that would be 'unamerican' (re: polite, neighbourly and decent) - for fucks sake it's not yours!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350531</id>
	<title>Re:NASA to blow up the moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxsULGo24qI</p><p>The moon aliens won't take kindly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = LxsULGo24qIThe moon aliens wo n't take kindly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxsULGo24qIThe moon aliens won't take kindly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28366903</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>CommanderIsm</author>
	<datestamp>1245236220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>so typically fucking american
blow things up

fucking idiots</htmltext>
<tokenext>so typically fucking american blow things up fucking idiots</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so typically fucking american
blow things up

fucking idiots</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350023</id>
	<title>Obligitory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245176520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://xkcd.com/397/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/397/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/397/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/397/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349301</id>
	<title>Re:Just like Mythbusters....</title>
	<author>TrevorB</author>
	<datestamp>1245174240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mythbusters wouldn't perform spectography on the resulting explosion...</p><p>(Although they are getting more clever as the years go on.  I wouldn't be surprised if Adam becomes the new Mr. Wizard in the 2020's...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mythbusters would n't perform spectography on the resulting explosion... ( Although they are getting more clever as the years go on .
I would n't be surprised if Adam becomes the new Mr. Wizard in the 2020 's... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mythbusters wouldn't perform spectography on the resulting explosion...(Although they are getting more clever as the years go on.
I wouldn't be surprised if Adam becomes the new Mr. Wizard in the 2020's...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351187</id>
	<title>Shortsighted</title>
	<author>mozzis</author>
	<datestamp>1245180480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much of the available water will be permanently dispersed by this experiment? What will be the effects of a 6-mile-high explosion on any water-bearing subsurface features? It seems to me that NASA is making establishing a permanent human presence on the moon harder by this rather sophomoric stunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much of the available water will be permanently dispersed by this experiment ?
What will be the effects of a 6-mile-high explosion on any water-bearing subsurface features ?
It seems to me that NASA is making establishing a permanent human presence on the moon harder by this rather sophomoric stunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much of the available water will be permanently dispersed by this experiment?
What will be the effects of a 6-mile-high explosion on any water-bearing subsurface features?
It seems to me that NASA is making establishing a permanent human presence on the moon harder by this rather sophomoric stunt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349853</id>
	<title>I'm surprised...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245176040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that this hasn't been tagged as <tt>shootthemoon</tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that this has n't been tagged as shootthemoon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that this hasn't been tagged as shootthemoon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349257</id>
	<title>an explosion on the moon?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1245174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>has anyone studied the dynamics of explosions in cheese? you shouldn't just be willy nilly setting off massive explosions in large chunks of cheese until you study all the possible ramifications</p><p>i mean it could trigger a horrible cheesequake</p><p>even just a little preliminary search by myself on google reveals that a cheesequake has become a large area devoid of human habitation!:</p><p><a href="http://www.stateparks.com/cheesequake.html" title="stateparks.com">http://www.stateparks.com/cheesequake.html</a> [stateparks.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has anyone studied the dynamics of explosions in cheese ?
you should n't just be willy nilly setting off massive explosions in large chunks of cheese until you study all the possible ramificationsi mean it could trigger a horrible cheesequakeeven just a little preliminary search by myself on google reveals that a cheesequake has become a large area devoid of human habitation !
: http : //www.stateparks.com/cheesequake.html [ stateparks.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has anyone studied the dynamics of explosions in cheese?
you shouldn't just be willy nilly setting off massive explosions in large chunks of cheese until you study all the possible ramificationsi mean it could trigger a horrible cheesequakeeven just a little preliminary search by myself on google reveals that a cheesequake has become a large area devoid of human habitation!
:http://www.stateparks.com/cheesequake.html [stateparks.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356779</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245164940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No ones seen the newer "The Time Machine" movie at NASA huh.secret plan to start building hotels and Walmarts.. Glad to see the American space agency is looking towards the future of mankinds demise..But at least we did it first!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No ones seen the newer " The Time Machine " movie at NASA huh.secret plan to start building hotels and Walmarts.. Glad to see the American space agency is looking towards the future of mankinds demise..But at least we did it first !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No ones seen the newer "The Time Machine" movie at NASA huh.secret plan to start building hotels and Walmarts.. Glad to see the American space agency is looking towards the future of mankinds demise..But at least we did it first!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350139</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1245176880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I miss the Tick. He was always there with a heaping spoonful of kick-ass to help the justice go down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I miss the Tick .
He was always there with a heaping spoonful of kick-ass to help the justice go down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I miss the Tick.
He was always there with a heaping spoonful of kick-ass to help the justice go down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349243</id>
	<title>Has anyone watched the Time Machine?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guy Pierce saw Orlando Jones blow up the moon, or something. It will happen, it's the future!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guy Pierce saw Orlando Jones blow up the moon , or something .
It will happen , it 's the future !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guy Pierce saw Orlando Jones blow up the moon, or something.
It will happen, it's the future!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350631</id>
	<title>Famous last words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245178440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We're certainly going to be making a big splash," Ennico said. "We're going to see something, but I don't know what to expect. I know on the night of the impact, I'll be running on adrenaline."</p><p>The adrenalin levels will really spike if it happens that the booster drops onto an outpost of an alien civilization that began when the solar system was young and has a level of technology sufficient to extinguish the human race in the blink of an eye, but has been totally invisible to us because they have been uninterested in anything above the surface of the moon for 500,000 years.</p><p>Until 2009-10-08.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We 're certainly going to be making a big splash , " Ennico said .
" We 're going to see something , but I do n't know what to expect .
I know on the night of the impact , I 'll be running on adrenaline .
" The adrenalin levels will really spike if it happens that the booster drops onto an outpost of an alien civilization that began when the solar system was young and has a level of technology sufficient to extinguish the human race in the blink of an eye , but has been totally invisible to us because they have been uninterested in anything above the surface of the moon for 500,000 years.Until 2009-10-08 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We're certainly going to be making a big splash," Ennico said.
"We're going to see something, but I don't know what to expect.
I know on the night of the impact, I'll be running on adrenaline.
"The adrenalin levels will really spike if it happens that the booster drops onto an outpost of an alien civilization that began when the solar system was young and has a level of technology sufficient to extinguish the human race in the blink of an eye, but has been totally invisible to us because they have been uninterested in anything above the surface of the moon for 500,000 years.Until 2009-10-08.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325</id>
	<title>Re:Not really thinking????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245174360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at a picture of the moon. Go on I'll wait.
<br>
OK, did you see the craters covering the surface? Look again if you want.<br>
Those are quite big no? In fact, they're bigger than the rocket booster - about half a million of them have diameters bigger than 1km (according to wikipedia). Since not one of those 500,000 (some of which are fairly recent) has had any significant effect on the moons orbit I'd say we're safe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at a picture of the moon .
Go on I 'll wait .
OK , did you see the craters covering the surface ?
Look again if you want .
Those are quite big no ?
In fact , they 're bigger than the rocket booster - about half a million of them have diameters bigger than 1km ( according to wikipedia ) .
Since not one of those 500,000 ( some of which are fairly recent ) has had any significant effect on the moons orbit I 'd say we 're safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at a picture of the moon.
Go on I'll wait.
OK, did you see the craters covering the surface?
Look again if you want.
Those are quite big no?
In fact, they're bigger than the rocket booster - about half a million of them have diameters bigger than 1km (according to wikipedia).
Since not one of those 500,000 (some of which are fairly recent) has had any significant effect on the moons orbit I'd say we're safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351807</id>
	<title>Didn't they try that on Sept 13, 1999?</title>
	<author>itsybitsy</author>
	<datestamp>1245182700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, they did! While it was good for the first 24 episodes the second "series" really sucked more as if that's possible.</p><p>Of course, it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space\_1999" title="wikipedia.org">Sept 13, 1999</a> [wikipedia.org] all over again if they try it!</p><p>Here is the TRUE evidence of what happened that fateful day: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npaRNpjV5IE" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npaRNpjV5IE</a> [youtube.com] .</p><p>They don't want you to know! The Truth is Out there somewhere... who the heck knows... someone does and they are not telling!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they did !
While it was good for the first 24 episodes the second " series " really sucked more as if that 's possible.Of course , it 's Sept 13 , 1999 [ wikipedia.org ] all over again if they try it ! Here is the TRUE evidence of what happened that fateful day : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = npaRNpjV5IE [ youtube.com ] .They do n't want you to know !
The Truth is Out there somewhere... who the heck knows... someone does and they are not telling ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they did!
While it was good for the first 24 episodes the second "series" really sucked more as if that's possible.Of course, it's Sept 13, 1999 [wikipedia.org] all over again if they try it!Here is the TRUE evidence of what happened that fateful day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npaRNpjV5IE [youtube.com] .They don't want you to know!
The Truth is Out there somewhere... who the heck knows... someone does and they are not telling!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they are just looking for someplace the US can bomb without getting their Yankee asses kicked (again). Iran and N Korea seem like bad ideas. Afghanistan and Iraq were bad ideas all along. Vietnam and Cuba didn't exactly work out either.<br>Lets hope there aren't little green men because they'd probably kick your ass too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they are just looking for someplace the US can bomb without getting their Yankee asses kicked ( again ) .
Iran and N Korea seem like bad ideas .
Afghanistan and Iraq were bad ideas all along .
Vietnam and Cuba did n't exactly work out either.Lets hope there are n't little green men because they 'd probably kick your ass too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they are just looking for someplace the US can bomb without getting their Yankee asses kicked (again).
Iran and N Korea seem like bad ideas.
Afghanistan and Iraq were bad ideas all along.
Vietnam and Cuba didn't exactly work out either.Lets hope there aren't little green men because they'd probably kick your ass too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350339</id>
	<title>contamination</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245177480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>won't the chemical debris of the explosion contaminate any water ice it mixes with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wo n't the chemical debris of the explosion contaminate any water ice it mixes with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>won't the chemical debris of the explosion contaminate any water ice it mixes with?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350369
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28363767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28366903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28361989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_16_1556254_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352511
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356779
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349155
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349491
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28355357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353069
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349459
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350239
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354805
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349091
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350301
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28361989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28363767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354961
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352781
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351297
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349555
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351847
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28357257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353849
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349817
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28366903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356917
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359449
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359627
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28354859
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350647
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28358697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349279
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351925
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349577
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350937
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349149
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28356077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28359309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28353589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349521
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349481
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28360265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349821
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350035
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351295
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349683
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349121
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28350031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28352473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28349545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28351293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_16_1556254.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_16_1556254.28348857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
