<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_15_232211</id>
	<title>Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers Busted</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1245080700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ectotherm writes <i>"The nice people behind the recorded phone messages stating 'By now you should have received your written note regarding your vehicle warranty expiring...' &mdash; the ones who instantly hang up when you ask for the name of the company &mdash; <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526357,00.html?mrp">have been busted</a>. Fox News did a little background digging on the four people charged."</i> Don't know about you, but I received three or four postcards in the mail from these scammers, as well as uncountable robocalls. The FTC says they cleared $10M since 2007.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ectotherm writes " The nice people behind the recorded phone messages stating 'By now you should have received your written note regarding your vehicle warranty expiring... '    the ones who instantly hang up when you ask for the name of the company    have been busted .
Fox News did a little background digging on the four people charged .
" Do n't know about you , but I received three or four postcards in the mail from these scammers , as well as uncountable robocalls .
The FTC says they cleared $ 10M since 2007 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ectotherm writes "The nice people behind the recorded phone messages stating 'By now you should have received your written note regarding your vehicle warranty expiring...' — the ones who instantly hang up when you ask for the name of the company — have been busted.
Fox News did a little background digging on the four people charged.
" Don't know about you, but I received three or four postcards in the mail from these scammers, as well as uncountable robocalls.
The FTC says they cleared $10M since 2007.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345027</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245182460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft's operating systems don't crash at *every* trade show, either. They both still suck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's operating systems do n't crash at * every * trade show , either .
They both still suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's operating systems don't crash at *every* trade show, either.
They both still suck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344091</id>
	<title>Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn....</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1245084660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>....to never run the same scam over and over? Oh right, because they are greedy crooks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....to never run the same scam over and over ?
Oh right , because they are greedy crooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....to never run the same scam over and over?
Oh right, because they are greedy crooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345323</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of their people are nuts, but they do have Shepherd Smith who can be pretty cool sometimes (even if he does have a creepy face):</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEtFMj6ZiHM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">When a commentator next to him said that waterboarding was helping intelligence efforts, he got so angry that he yelled that, "he didn't give a rats ass if it helps" and that, "We are America! We do not FUCKING torture!" (followed by a quiet "oops" a little later).</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6Ygek3xV4Y" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Here he is mocking Glenn Beck on air.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of their people are nuts , but they do have Shepherd Smith who can be pretty cool sometimes ( even if he does have a creepy face ) : When a commentator next to him said that waterboarding was helping intelligence efforts , he got so angry that he yelled that , " he did n't give a rats ass if it helps " and that , " We are America !
We do not FUCKING torture !
" ( followed by a quiet " oops " a little later ) .
[ youtube.com ] Here he is mocking Glenn Beck on air .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of their people are nuts, but they do have Shepherd Smith who can be pretty cool sometimes (even if he does have a creepy face):When a commentator next to him said that waterboarding was helping intelligence efforts, he got so angry that he yelled that, "he didn't give a rats ass if it helps" and that, "We are America!
We do not FUCKING torture!
" (followed by a quiet "oops" a little later).
[youtube.com]Here he is mocking Glenn Beck on air.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28369027</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>ectotherm</author>
	<datestamp>1245253680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is what I did:

Sales Rep:  Hi, did you call to extend your automobile warranty?

Ectotherm:  Yes, I did !!!!

Sales Rep:  Great!!  What is the make, model, and year your car was manufactured?

Ectotherm:  Well, since you called me, shouldn't you know?  After all, if you are telling me that my warranty is expiring, shouldn't you already know that information?

Sales Rep:  Well, your auto company called US and let US know to make you the offer.

Ectotherm:  Really?  Hmmmmmm... Which auto company called you?

Sales Rep:  YOUR auto company called US and told US to contact YOU because your warranty is almost up.

Ectotherm:  But my car is only six months old!  Is the 3 year/36K mile warranty up already?

Sales Rep:  &gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is what I did : Sales Rep : Hi , did you call to extend your automobile warranty ?
Ectotherm : Yes , I did ! ! ! !
Sales Rep : Great ! !
What is the make , model , and year your car was manufactured ?
Ectotherm : Well , since you called me , should n't you know ?
After all , if you are telling me that my warranty is expiring , should n't you already know that information ?
Sales Rep : Well , your auto company called US and let US know to make you the offer .
Ectotherm : Really ?
Hmmmmmm... Which auto company called you ?
Sales Rep : YOUR auto company called US and told US to contact YOU because your warranty is almost up .
Ectotherm : But my car is only six months old !
Is the 3 year/36K mile warranty up already ?
Sales Rep : &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is what I did:

Sales Rep:  Hi, did you call to extend your automobile warranty?
Ectotherm:  Yes, I did !!!!
Sales Rep:  Great!!
What is the make, model, and year your car was manufactured?
Ectotherm:  Well, since you called me, shouldn't you know?
After all, if you are telling me that my warranty is expiring, shouldn't you already know that information?
Sales Rep:  Well, your auto company called US and let US know to make you the offer.
Ectotherm:  Really?
Hmmmmmm... Which auto company called you?
Sales Rep:  YOUR auto company called US and told US to contact YOU because your warranty is almost up.
Ectotherm:  But my car is only six months old!
Is the 3 year/36K mile warranty up already?
Sales Rep:  &gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347105</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>phud</author>
	<datestamp>1245164520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even a blind nut finds a squirrel now and then</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even a blind nut finds a squirrel now and then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even a blind nut finds a squirrel now and then</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346679</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>cyphergirl</author>
	<datestamp>1245161760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They sent me a card for a 2004 Honda, but I've never owned a Honda in my life.  I called the number on the card and demanded to know where they got their info.  The guy I talked to kept telling me that they got it from Honda and the DMV, then tried to get info out of me about what car I do own so he could sell me a warranty.  We went back and forth for almost 15 minutes (I can't believe I kept him on the hook that long) when I threatened to sue him *personally* for identity theft.  Poor dumb guy was so scared (seriously.. how would I know who he was to sue him?!) he gave up the company he was calling for:  US Fidelis.  I still get pissed when I see their commercials now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They sent me a card for a 2004 Honda , but I 've never owned a Honda in my life .
I called the number on the card and demanded to know where they got their info .
The guy I talked to kept telling me that they got it from Honda and the DMV , then tried to get info out of me about what car I do own so he could sell me a warranty .
We went back and forth for almost 15 minutes ( I ca n't believe I kept him on the hook that long ) when I threatened to sue him * personally * for identity theft .
Poor dumb guy was so scared ( seriously.. how would I know who he was to sue him ? !
) he gave up the company he was calling for : US Fidelis .
I still get pissed when I see their commercials now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They sent me a card for a 2004 Honda, but I've never owned a Honda in my life.
I called the number on the card and demanded to know where they got their info.
The guy I talked to kept telling me that they got it from Honda and the DMV, then tried to get info out of me about what car I do own so he could sell me a warranty.
We went back and forth for almost 15 minutes (I can't believe I kept him on the hook that long) when I threatened to sue him *personally* for identity theft.
Poor dumb guy was so scared (seriously.. how would I know who he was to sue him?!
) he gave up the company he was calling for:  US Fidelis.
I still get pissed when I see their commercials now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28414143</id>
	<title>Auto Warranty scammers</title>
	<author>StewBaby2005</author>
	<datestamp>1245583500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They were trying to sell an extended warranty to the elevator
at my work last spring... for real..</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were trying to sell an extended warranty to the elevator at my work last spring... for real. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were trying to sell an extended warranty to the elevator
at my work last spring... for real..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350273</id>
	<title>I just ...</title>
	<author>SlashDev</author>
	<datestamp>1245177360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. can't comprehend how people really believe they can get away with these types of scams; I'm beginning to think that the population is even dumber than I thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. ca n't comprehend how people really believe they can get away with these types of scams ; I 'm beginning to think that the population is even dumber than I thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. can't comprehend how people really believe they can get away with these types of scams; I'm beginning to think that the population is even dumber than I thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344885</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>z0idberg</author>
	<datestamp>1245093900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you ever notice the "blinker fluid" seemed to need replacing just when their new car sales were falling below target?</p><p>It's only a matter of time from *right now* that everything starts breaking down on your car, whether you have had your "blinker fluid" replaced or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ever notice the " blinker fluid " seemed to need replacing just when their new car sales were falling below target ? It 's only a matter of time from * right now * that everything starts breaking down on your car , whether you have had your " blinker fluid " replaced or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ever notice the "blinker fluid" seemed to need replacing just when their new car sales were falling below target?It's only a matter of time from *right now* that everything starts breaking down on your car, whether you have had your "blinker fluid" replaced or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350705</id>
	<title>Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment.</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1245178620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should have asked if you could decline one of the free magazine subscriptions (a $12.95 value!) to pay for the $12.95 processing fee. "Er, well, it's a $12.95 value, but it only costs us $1.95."</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should have asked if you could decline one of the free magazine subscriptions ( a $ 12.95 value !
) to pay for the $ 12.95 processing fee .
" Er , well , it 's a $ 12.95 value , but it only costs us $ 1.95 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should have asked if you could decline one of the free magazine subscriptions (a $12.95 value!
) to pay for the $12.95 processing fee.
"Er, well, it's a $12.95 value, but it only costs us $1.95.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347859</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1245168720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, now I kind of wish I HAD gotten a call from them, so I could mess with them this way... Let's see them try to discuss the warranty on my '74 Dodge Dart<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , now I kind of wish I HAD gotten a call from them , so I could mess with them this way... Let 's see them try to discuss the warranty on my '74 Dodge Dart : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, now I kind of wish I HAD gotten a call from them, so I could mess with them this way... Let's see them try to discuss the warranty on my '74 Dodge Dart :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344505</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1245089400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.<br>I don't have a car.</i></p><p>Okay, smartypants, if you don't have a car, how do you know when its warranty expires?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.I do n't have a car.Okay , smartypants , if you do n't have a car , how do you know when its warranty expires ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.I don't have a car.Okay, smartypants, if you don't have a car, how do you know when its warranty expires?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344895</id>
	<title>They call, they call, they call</title>
	<author>Gary W. Longsine</author>
	<datestamp>1245094020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would you like to buy a "y" or two?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you like to buy a " y " or two ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you like to buy a "y" or two?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354071</id>
	<title>Re:And the new scam de jour....</title>
	<author>Single GNU Theory</author>
	<datestamp>1245148620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got that one today, too.  Dammit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got that one today , too .
Dammit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got that one today, too.
Dammit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344481</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245089160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same here, and I thought it highly amusing since I still had over 40k miles and 4 years left on my super-duper Hyundai warranty. But yeah, good point... they must have had information pertaining to the sale dates and stuff (I'd have been right on the mark on a standard warranty). I wonder how this information is made available?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here , and I thought it highly amusing since I still had over 40k miles and 4 years left on my super-duper Hyundai warranty .
But yeah , good point... they must have had information pertaining to the sale dates and stuff ( I 'd have been right on the mark on a standard warranty ) .
I wonder how this information is made available ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here, and I thought it highly amusing since I still had over 40k miles and 4 years left on my super-duper Hyundai warranty.
But yeah, good point... they must have had information pertaining to the sale dates and stuff (I'd have been right on the mark on a standard warranty).
I wonder how this information is made available?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344321</id>
	<title>Knew it was a scam...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245087180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was crazy, I received a couple of phone calls on my VoIP phone at around 3am Japan time telling me that my warranty was about to expire blah blah blah, I don't even live in the states right now since I'm stationed in Japan.  Right away I knew the calls were bogus.  I usually hung up on them but they called several other times, still at ungodly times of the night since we're about 15 hrs or so ahead of the US.  I hope they catch every single one of the bastards...!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was crazy , I received a couple of phone calls on my VoIP phone at around 3am Japan time telling me that my warranty was about to expire blah blah blah , I do n't even live in the states right now since I 'm stationed in Japan .
Right away I knew the calls were bogus .
I usually hung up on them but they called several other times , still at ungodly times of the night since we 're about 15 hrs or so ahead of the US .
I hope they catch every single one of the bastards... !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was crazy, I received a couple of phone calls on my VoIP phone at around 3am Japan time telling me that my warranty was about to expire blah blah blah, I don't even live in the states right now since I'm stationed in Japan.
Right away I knew the calls were bogus.
I usually hung up on them but they called several other times, still at ungodly times of the night since we're about 15 hrs or so ahead of the US.
I hope they catch every single one of the bastards...!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344913</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245094260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm so conflicted...</p></div><p>Liberal media will do that to a person.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?</p></div><p>Feels good doesn't it? What a relief it is for you, I imagine, not to be lied to by the liberal media you've been watching. Good to know you've seen the light by paying attention to a reliable news source like Fox. There is hope for you yet.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know how to feel!</p></div><p>Relief. Relief that you know you can get news without horrible liberal lies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so conflicted...Liberal media will do that to a person.Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way ? Feels good does n't it ?
What a relief it is for you , I imagine , not to be lied to by the liberal media you 've been watching .
Good to know you 've seen the light by paying attention to a reliable news source like Fox .
There is hope for you yet.I do n't know how to feel ! Relief .
Relief that you know you can get news without horrible liberal lies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so conflicted...Liberal media will do that to a person.Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?Feels good doesn't it?
What a relief it is for you, I imagine, not to be lied to by the liberal media you've been watching.
Good to know you've seen the light by paying attention to a reliable news source like Fox.
There is hope for you yet.I don't know how to feel!Relief.
Relief that you know you can get news without horrible liberal lies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347313</id>
	<title>where is the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1245165840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I kept getting these scam calls on my cell phone, and I complained to the FCC but get I kept getting more scam calls. The FCC should have been on the ball about this long ago as they already have strict laws against automated dialing:<br>
"(a) No person or entity may: (1) <b>Initiate any telephone call</b> (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party)<b>using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice;</b>"<br>
"To any telephone number assigned to a paging service, <b>cellular telephone service</b>, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call."
<br>
<a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=47&amp;PART=64&amp;SECTION=1200&amp;TYPE=TEXT" title="gpo.gov">Title 47</a> [gpo.gov]
<br>
<br>
When a tiny glimpse of a nipple showed up on TV they were on it instantly even though almost everyone already has one pair of nipples and seeing a third one on TV isn't going to harm anyone. Then there's shit like this where people run telemarketing scam and yank millions of dollars while the FCC just sits there with head in ass doing nothing about it. Perhaps they should change the name from Federal Communications Commission to <b>Federal Censorship Commission</b> because obviously they care about nothing other than preventing people from saying fuck on TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I kept getting these scam calls on my cell phone , and I complained to the FCC but get I kept getting more scam calls .
The FCC should have been on the ball about this long ago as they already have strict laws against automated dialing : " ( a ) No person or entity may : ( 1 ) Initiate any telephone call ( other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party ) using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice ; " " To any telephone number assigned to a paging service , cellular telephone service , specialized mobile radio service , or other radio common carrier service , or any service for which the called party is charged for the call .
" Title 47 [ gpo.gov ] When a tiny glimpse of a nipple showed up on TV they were on it instantly even though almost everyone already has one pair of nipples and seeing a third one on TV is n't going to harm anyone .
Then there 's shit like this where people run telemarketing scam and yank millions of dollars while the FCC just sits there with head in ass doing nothing about it .
Perhaps they should change the name from Federal Communications Commission to Federal Censorship Commission because obviously they care about nothing other than preventing people from saying fuck on TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kept getting these scam calls on my cell phone, and I complained to the FCC but get I kept getting more scam calls.
The FCC should have been on the ball about this long ago as they already have strict laws against automated dialing:
"(a) No person or entity may: (1) Initiate any telephone call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party)using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice;"
"To any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call.
"

Title 47 [gpo.gov]


When a tiny glimpse of a nipple showed up on TV they were on it instantly even though almost everyone already has one pair of nipples and seeing a third one on TV isn't going to harm anyone.
Then there's shit like this where people run telemarketing scam and yank millions of dollars while the FCC just sits there with head in ass doing nothing about it.
Perhaps they should change the name from Federal Communications Commission to Federal Censorship Commission because obviously they care about nothing other than preventing people from saying fuck on TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346387</id>
	<title>Typical of Government</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245159420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is typical government work when conflation is involved.  Government is just not established to be involved with the private sector.  See bailouts, government healthcare, Do Not Call Lists, digital transition mandate... the list goes on.  Anything the government touches in the private sector will wither and die a fabulous death, guaranteed.  (Take note how the FTC did nothing, as it took a Schumer's personal vendetta to get anything done.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is typical government work when conflation is involved .
Government is just not established to be involved with the private sector .
See bailouts , government healthcare , Do Not Call Lists , digital transition mandate... the list goes on .
Anything the government touches in the private sector will wither and die a fabulous death , guaranteed .
( Take note how the FTC did nothing , as it took a Schumer 's personal vendetta to get anything done .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is typical government work when conflation is involved.
Government is just not established to be involved with the private sector.
See bailouts, government healthcare, Do Not Call Lists, digital transition mandate... the list goes on.
Anything the government touches in the private sector will wither and die a fabulous death, guaranteed.
(Take note how the FTC did nothing, as it took a Schumer's personal vendetta to get anything done.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344421</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245088440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is all the FOX news bashing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is all the FOX news bashing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is all the FOX news bashing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344209</id>
	<title>From TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245085860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Damian P. Kohlfeld, 35, of Valparaiso, Ind., is the owner of Network Foundations, which is based in Chicago. Kohlfeld allegedly supplied the technical know-how for the alleged telemarketing scheme employed by all three companies. The <strong>Arizona State University</strong> graduate has more than a decade of experience writing software and building computer networks. His latest hit, according to the FTC, was a "spoofing" device that tricked caller ID systems.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Woo!  Go Sun Devils!
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damian P. Kohlfeld , 35 , of Valparaiso , Ind. , is the owner of Network Foundations , which is based in Chicago .
Kohlfeld allegedly supplied the technical know-how for the alleged telemarketing scheme employed by all three companies .
The Arizona State University graduate has more than a decade of experience writing software and building computer networks .
His latest hit , according to the FTC , was a " spoofing " device that tricked caller ID systems .
Woo ! Go Sun Devils !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damian P. Kohlfeld, 35, of Valparaiso, Ind., is the owner of Network Foundations, which is based in Chicago.
Kohlfeld allegedly supplied the technical know-how for the alleged telemarketing scheme employed by all three companies.
The Arizona State University graduate has more than a decade of experience writing software and building computer networks.
His latest hit, according to the FTC, was a "spoofing" device that tricked caller ID systems.
Woo!  Go Sun Devils!

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347071</id>
	<title>Other telemarketing scams?</title>
	<author>avtchillsboro</author>
	<datestamp>1245164340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone else get the calls offering $1000 cash for "debt reversal?  Often times several robocalls per day, several different voices (male &amp; female); the script never varies:<br> <br>

(paraphrasing)<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."Hello...this is (caller's first name here) at (scamming institution's name here, e.g "Financial Associates") I'm calling because we've talked before..." (untrue) "...You qualify for Financial Associates's Debt Reversal program--for up to $1000 cash.  Now...we've talked before, and maybe at that time Debt Reversal Associates's program wasn't right for you...but I'm looooking oooover yourrrrr fiiiiile, and you definitely qualify. So give me at 866-blah-blah and I will make sure your file gets priority treatment..."   (end of call)<br> <br>

Not sure what their angle is--I've never taken the bait.<br>
My assumption is that they want to "verify" all my personal info to facilitate identity theft; or at the very least, my checking account # so that they can (ahem) direct deposit that $1000!<br> <br>

Do any<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.s have experience w/these creeps?  OTOH--I doubt that many<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.s are gullible enough to fall for this scam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else get the calls offering $ 1000 cash for " debt reversal ?
Often times several robocalls per day , several different voices ( male &amp; female ) ; the script never varies : ( paraphrasing ) ... " Hello...this is ( caller 's first name here ) at ( scamming institution 's name here , e.g " Financial Associates " ) I 'm calling because we 've talked before... " ( untrue ) " ...You qualify for Financial Associates 's Debt Reversal program--for up to $ 1000 cash .
Now...we 've talked before , and maybe at that time Debt Reversal Associates 's program was n't right for you...but I 'm looooking oooover yourrrrr fiiiiile , and you definitely qualify .
So give me at 866-blah-blah and I will make sure your file gets priority treatment... " ( end of call ) Not sure what their angle is--I 've never taken the bait .
My assumption is that they want to " verify " all my personal info to facilitate identity theft ; or at the very least , my checking account # so that they can ( ahem ) direct deposit that $ 1000 !
Do any /.s have experience w/these creeps ?
OTOH--I doubt that many /.s are gullible enough to fall for this scam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else get the calls offering $1000 cash for "debt reversal?
Often times several robocalls per day, several different voices (male &amp; female); the script never varies: 

(paraphrasing)  ..."Hello...this is (caller's first name here) at (scamming institution's name here, e.g "Financial Associates") I'm calling because we've talked before..." (untrue) "...You qualify for Financial Associates's Debt Reversal program--for up to $1000 cash.
Now...we've talked before, and maybe at that time Debt Reversal Associates's program wasn't right for you...but I'm looooking oooover yourrrrr fiiiiile, and you definitely qualify.
So give me at 866-blah-blah and I will make sure your file gets priority treatment..."   (end of call) 

Not sure what their angle is--I've never taken the bait.
My assumption is that they want to "verify" all my personal info to facilitate identity theft; or at the very least, my checking account # so that they can (ahem) direct deposit that $1000!
Do any /.s have experience w/these creeps?
OTOH--I doubt that many /.s are gullible enough to fall for this scam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349535</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>harl</author>
	<datestamp>1245174960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!!</p></div><p>I don't think that word means what you think it means.</p><p>How can digging through public records be an invasion of privacy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations .
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me !
! I do n't think that word means what you think it means.How can digging through public records be an invasion of privacy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations.
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!
!I don't think that word means what you think it means.How can digging through public records be an invasion of privacy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245089580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup.  I even reported a handful of calls to the FTC (using their website) just a few weeks before Chuck Schumer declared war on these guys.</p><p>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".  I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said.  But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.</p><p>This should be considered a major FAIL for the FTC and the Do Not Call list.  Which is a shame, too, because the DNC has been a great success with this exception.</p><p>It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.</p><p>I hope that after these criminals are tried, a second investigation starts to find out why the FTC had their head up their ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup .
I even reported a handful of calls to the FTC ( using their website ) just a few weeks before Chuck Schumer declared war on these guys.I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they could n't do anything because " I did n't provide them enough information " .
I gave them the time of day , the CID , and what the robo greeting said .
But I guess because I did n't talk to a human , it did n't count.This should be considered a major FAIL for the FTC and the Do Not Call list .
Which is a shame , too , because the DNC has been a great success with this exception.It 's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them , and to add insult to injury , it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.I hope that after these criminals are tried , a second investigation starts to find out why the FTC had their head up their ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup.
I even reported a handful of calls to the FTC (using their website) just a few weeks before Chuck Schumer declared war on these guys.I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".
I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said.
But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.This should be considered a major FAIL for the FTC and the Do Not Call list.
Which is a shame, too, because the DNC has been a great success with this exception.It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.I hope that after these criminals are tried, a second investigation starts to find out why the FTC had their head up their ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346049</id>
	<title>Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245155040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?"</p><p>They were free as in free speech, not as in free beer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $ 12.95 ?
" They were free as in free speech , not as in free beer : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?
"They were free as in free speech, not as in free beer :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</id>
	<title>I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1245089700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always take my car in for service at the dealership. I just trade for a new car when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the blinker fluid. The mechanics let me in on the auto industry secret that once that happens, it's only a matter of time before everything starts breaking down. It's saved me a lotta hassle. Sure, it's more expensive, but this is one of those instances where you get what you pay for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always take my car in for service at the dealership .
I just trade for a new car when the mechanics there tell me it 's time to replace the blinker fluid .
The mechanics let me in on the auto industry secret that once that happens , it 's only a matter of time before everything starts breaking down .
It 's saved me a lotta hassle .
Sure , it 's more expensive , but this is one of those instances where you get what you pay for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always take my car in for service at the dealership.
I just trade for a new car when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the blinker fluid.
The mechanics let me in on the auto industry secret that once that happens, it's only a matter of time before everything starts breaking down.
It's saved me a lotta hassle.
Sure, it's more expensive, but this is one of those instances where you get what you pay for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346035</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1245154860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mine went like...<br>
<br>
<i>press 1</i> <br>
<br>
me: Uhh...  my car is 1 year old and a company owned lease<br>
<br>
them: *click*<br>
<br>
And that was on my cell phone.  The lady I sit next to at work got called on her home, cell AND work phone.  I guess I got lucky by only getting called on my cell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mine went like.. . press 1 me : Uhh... my car is 1 year old and a company owned lease them : * click * And that was on my cell phone .
The lady I sit next to at work got called on her home , cell AND work phone .
I guess I got lucky by only getting called on my cell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mine went like...

press 1 

me: Uhh...  my car is 1 year old and a company owned lease

them: *click*

And that was on my cell phone.
The lady I sit next to at work got called on her home, cell AND work phone.
I guess I got lucky by only getting called on my cell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229</id>
	<title>Busted only when they bothered someone "important"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245085980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What really bugs me about all this is that despite what were probably thousands of reports to the gov't, nothing was done and nobody really brought it up in the media until they accidentally bothered NY senator Chuck Schumer.
Had they not stumbled onto his number, one wonders if they would still be in business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What really bugs me about all this is that despite what were probably thousands of reports to the gov't , nothing was done and nobody really brought it up in the media until they accidentally bothered NY senator Chuck Schumer .
Had they not stumbled onto his number , one wonders if they would still be in business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What really bugs me about all this is that despite what were probably thousands of reports to the gov't, nothing was done and nobody really brought it up in the media until they accidentally bothered NY senator Chuck Schumer.
Had they not stumbled onto his number, one wonders if they would still be in business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344603</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>Tanktalus</author>
	<datestamp>1245090300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>fry their brains.</p></div><p>Really?  I'm not entirely sure there'd be much pleasure in it.  Certainly, not enough pleasure anyway...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>fry their brains.Really ?
I 'm not entirely sure there 'd be much pleasure in it .
Certainly , not enough pleasure anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fry their brains.Really?
I'm not entirely sure there'd be much pleasure in it.
Certainly, not enough pleasure anyway...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344297</id>
	<title>so many calls</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1245086880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have so many of these on my vonage voicemail. Any time I did press '1' it would just hang up, I guess they were too busy to bother scamming me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have so many of these on my vonage voicemail .
Any time I did press '1 ' it would just hang up , I guess they were too busy to bother scamming me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have so many of these on my vonage voicemail.
Any time I did press '1' it would just hang up, I guess they were too busy to bother scamming me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344285</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>Faerunner</author>
	<datestamp>1245086640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure you never tried asking them "So who do I make this check out to?".

<br> <br>I got these calls on my cell phone as well. What always got me was how it was the 2nd notice, when I had yet to get a first one, and the one time I answered the phone they asked me about the make and model of my car. I totaled the last car registered to me in 2005. Nice job, guys!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure you never tried asking them " So who do I make this check out to ? " .
I got these calls on my cell phone as well .
What always got me was how it was the 2nd notice , when I had yet to get a first one , and the one time I answered the phone they asked me about the make and model of my car .
I totaled the last car registered to me in 2005 .
Nice job , guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure you never tried asking them "So who do I make this check out to?".
I got these calls on my cell phone as well.
What always got me was how it was the 2nd notice, when I had yet to get a first one, and the one time I answered the phone they asked me about the make and model of my car.
I totaled the last car registered to me in 2005.
Nice job, guys!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344787</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245092460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the <b>blinker fluid</b></p></div> </blockquote><p>What does your car use for blinkers?  Fireflies?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... when the mechanics there tell me it 's time to replace the blinker fluid What does your car use for blinkers ?
Fireflies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when the mechanics there tell me it's time to replace the blinker fluid What does your car use for blinkers?
Fireflies?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345093</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Macman408</author>
	<datestamp>1245183360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But the action you must take is clear: under no circumstances are you to follow the link, or read the article. This is Slashdot! And that is Fox News! TWO reasons!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the action you must take is clear : under no circumstances are you to follow the link , or read the article .
This is Slashdot !
And that is Fox News !
TWO reasons ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the action you must take is clear: under no circumstances are you to follow the link, or read the article.
This is Slashdot!
And that is Fox News!
TWO reasons!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344941</id>
	<title>"The FTC says they cleared $10M"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245094680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF?  Seriously: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?</p><p>It was *so* obviously a scam - who on earth would give them a single penny?  They knew nothing whatsoever about the car whose warranty allegedly expired, and they hung up as soon as you asked them a single question about anything at all.  Anything I ever said to them got me disconnected.</p><p>How in the name of all that is holy did they collect a cent from anyone, if anything you say or ask makes them hang up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Seriously : Whiskey Tango Foxtrot ? It was * so * obviously a scam - who on earth would give them a single penny ?
They knew nothing whatsoever about the car whose warranty allegedly expired , and they hung up as soon as you asked them a single question about anything at all .
Anything I ever said to them got me disconnected.How in the name of all that is holy did they collect a cent from anyone , if anything you say or ask makes them hang up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Seriously: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?It was *so* obviously a scam - who on earth would give them a single penny?
They knew nothing whatsoever about the car whose warranty allegedly expired, and they hung up as soon as you asked them a single question about anything at all.
Anything I ever said to them got me disconnected.How in the name of all that is holy did they collect a cent from anyone, if anything you say or ask makes them hang up?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344329</id>
	<title>Have fun with them!</title>
	<author>squiggly12</author>
	<datestamp>1245087300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love to mess with them.
<p>When they call, be very attentive to what they are saying. When they ask what type of vehicle and what not, just say 57 Chevy with oh about 500.000 miles. I can guarantee 6 out of 10 times you will get the automatic hang up.
</p><p>Try to be as insistent as possible before they hang up that you really, really need warranty. Listen to them stutter, lol.
</p><p>Yes, I'm an ass. My vehicle is a 1995 Chevy with 210k miles. PLEASE GIVE ME WARRANTY NAO!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love to mess with them .
When they call , be very attentive to what they are saying .
When they ask what type of vehicle and what not , just say 57 Chevy with oh about 500.000 miles .
I can guarantee 6 out of 10 times you will get the automatic hang up .
Try to be as insistent as possible before they hang up that you really , really need warranty .
Listen to them stutter , lol .
Yes , I 'm an ass .
My vehicle is a 1995 Chevy with 210k miles .
PLEASE GIVE ME WARRANTY NAO !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love to mess with them.
When they call, be very attentive to what they are saying.
When they ask what type of vehicle and what not, just say 57 Chevy with oh about 500.000 miles.
I can guarantee 6 out of 10 times you will get the automatic hang up.
Try to be as insistent as possible before they hang up that you really, really need warranty.
Listen to them stutter, lol.
Yes, I'm an ass.
My vehicle is a 1995 Chevy with 210k miles.
PLEASE GIVE ME WARRANTY NAO!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347839</id>
	<title>Re:Anybody ever press #2 at the menu?</title>
	<author>green1</author>
	<datestamp>1245168600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I press 2 when it gives me the option... I did notice on one though, if you press 2, and then wait, about 30 seconds to a minute later a voice said "you will now be removed, please stand by" another 30 seconds or so "you have now been removed from our list"<br>I suspect they were betting that people will just press 2 and hang up and not wait to be removed.</p><p>either way though, it doesn't seem to have reduced the number of these scam calls...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I press 2 when it gives me the option... I did notice on one though , if you press 2 , and then wait , about 30 seconds to a minute later a voice said " you will now be removed , please stand by " another 30 seconds or so " you have now been removed from our list " I suspect they were betting that people will just press 2 and hang up and not wait to be removed.either way though , it does n't seem to have reduced the number of these scam calls.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I press 2 when it gives me the option... I did notice on one though, if you press 2, and then wait, about 30 seconds to a minute later a voice said "you will now be removed, please stand by" another 30 seconds or so "you have now been removed from our list"I suspect they were betting that people will just press 2 and hang up and not wait to be removed.either way though, it doesn't seem to have reduced the number of these scam calls...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344771</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245092340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>unless they win</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>unless they win</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless they win</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344979</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245095160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never received any post cards or phone calls on my land line or cell phone.  I suspect it is because I always buy my cars from a private party and I always pay cash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never received any post cards or phone calls on my land line or cell phone .
I suspect it is because I always buy my cars from a private party and I always pay cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never received any post cards or phone calls on my land line or cell phone.
I suspect it is because I always buy my cars from a private party and I always pay cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346911</id>
	<title>VISA &amp; MasterCard robocalling?</title>
	<author>DudeTheMath</author>
	<datestamp>1245163380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got a call a couple of days ago from "Visa and MasterCard" offering to help lower my rates. I said, "Which card?"
</p><p>They said, "Either VISA or MasterCard."
</p><p>"Which issuing bank? CitiBank? Chase?"
</p><p>"Either, as long as it's a VISA or MasterCard."
</p><p>"This phone number is on the Do Not Call registry."
</p><p>*click*
</p><p>Has anyone else heard of this yet? Is it a new scam, or did I piss off a legitimate phonesalesthug?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a call a couple of days ago from " Visa and MasterCard " offering to help lower my rates .
I said , " Which card ?
" They said , " Either VISA or MasterCard .
" " Which issuing bank ?
CitiBank ? Chase ?
" " Either , as long as it 's a VISA or MasterCard .
" " This phone number is on the Do Not Call registry .
" * click * Has anyone else heard of this yet ?
Is it a new scam , or did I piss off a legitimate phonesalesthug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a call a couple of days ago from "Visa and MasterCard" offering to help lower my rates.
I said, "Which card?
"
They said, "Either VISA or MasterCard.
"
"Which issuing bank?
CitiBank? Chase?
"
"Either, as long as it's a VISA or MasterCard.
"
"This phone number is on the Do Not Call registry.
"
*click*
Has anyone else heard of this yet?
Is it a new scam, or did I piss off a legitimate phonesalesthug?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345263</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1245185460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?"</p><p>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"</p><p>*click*</p></div><p>That's better treatment than I got! The one time they called that I wasn't too busy to just hang up, all I got (after sitting through the message and waiting for the "sales rep") was a bored</p><p>"Hello?*click*"</p><p>They hung up on me before I said anything, before they even made any type of pitch.  They just KNEW I wasn't going to send them money.</p><p>Another time I was in a seminar class, only 5 people and the professor.  We were waiting for one of the other students to show up, when a phone on the wall of the classroom, previously unnoticed, rang.  We all looked at each other, then the professor, who looked back at us, just as confused.  Thinking there was a greater than zero chance it was something like an emergency announcement or something important, I answered the phone...</p><p>Yes, the classroom's auto factory warranty had run out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hello , what 's the make of your vehicle ?
" " May I ask who I 'm speaking to ?
" * click * That 's better treatment than I got !
The one time they called that I was n't too busy to just hang up , all I got ( after sitting through the message and waiting for the " sales rep " ) was a bored " Hello ?
* click * " They hung up on me before I said anything , before they even made any type of pitch .
They just KNEW I was n't going to send them money.Another time I was in a seminar class , only 5 people and the professor .
We were waiting for one of the other students to show up , when a phone on the wall of the classroom , previously unnoticed , rang .
We all looked at each other , then the professor , who looked back at us , just as confused .
Thinking there was a greater than zero chance it was something like an emergency announcement or something important , I answered the phone...Yes , the classroom 's auto factory warranty had run out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?
""May I ask who I'm speaking to?
"*click*That's better treatment than I got!
The one time they called that I wasn't too busy to just hang up, all I got (after sitting through the message and waiting for the "sales rep") was a bored"Hello?
*click*"They hung up on me before I said anything, before they even made any type of pitch.
They just KNEW I wasn't going to send them money.Another time I was in a seminar class, only 5 people and the professor.
We were waiting for one of the other students to show up, when a phone on the wall of the classroom, previously unnoticed, rang.
We all looked at each other, then the professor, who looked back at us, just as confused.
Thinking there was a greater than zero chance it was something like an emergency announcement or something important, I answered the phone...Yes, the classroom's auto factory warranty had run out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149</id>
	<title>stop them in less than 2 years next time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245085200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know I personally received several hundred calls from these guys.  I had numerous people tell me they had received the same types of calls.  The FTC can stop patting themselves on the back, the fact that it took this long is embarrassing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I personally received several hundred calls from these guys .
I had numerous people tell me they had received the same types of calls .
The FTC can stop patting themselves on the back , the fact that it took this long is embarrassing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I personally received several hundred calls from these guys.
I had numerous people tell me they had received the same types of calls.
The FTC can stop patting themselves on the back, the fact that it took this long is embarrassing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348619</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245172020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sheesh.  You were getting ripped off!  Everybody knows <a href="http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main\_page=product\_info&amp;products\_id=6" title="kalecoauto.com" rel="nofollow">blinker fluid is cheap to replace</a> [kalecoauto.com].  And there are plenty of other parts with reasonable replacement costs, such as <a href="http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main\_page=product\_info&amp;products\_id=9" title="kalecoauto.com" rel="nofollow">Kuhneutson valves</a> [kalecoauto.com], <a href="http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main\_page=product\_info&amp;cPath=3&amp;products\_id=10" title="kalecoauto.com" rel="nofollow">muffler bearings</a> [kalecoauto.com], and <a href="http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main\_page=product\_info&amp;cPath=3&amp;products\_id=27" title="kalecoauto.com" rel="nofollow">piston springs</a> [kalecoauto.com].  You don't have to pay the dealer prices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sheesh .
You were getting ripped off !
Everybody knows blinker fluid is cheap to replace [ kalecoauto.com ] .
And there are plenty of other parts with reasonable replacement costs , such as Kuhneutson valves [ kalecoauto.com ] , muffler bearings [ kalecoauto.com ] , and piston springs [ kalecoauto.com ] .
You do n't have to pay the dealer prices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sheesh.
You were getting ripped off!
Everybody knows blinker fluid is cheap to replace [kalecoauto.com].
And there are plenty of other parts with reasonable replacement costs, such as Kuhneutson valves [kalecoauto.com], muffler bearings [kalecoauto.com], and piston springs [kalecoauto.com].
You don't have to pay the dealer prices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346571</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1245160920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else now getting spam emails about auto warranties?  They seem to have just moved online..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else now getting spam emails about auto warranties ?
They seem to have just moved online. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else now getting spam emails about auto warranties?
They seem to have just moved online..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347399</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>jekewa</author>
	<datestamp>1245166380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly! I don't own a car, just a couple of motorcycles.
</p><p>
I ignored the calls (usually ignore calls from "unknown number" or even just numbers I don't know) at first, but they came twice a day...to an office desk phone...to which I had no actual (e.g., phone directory) relationship.
</p><p>
I eventually answered one, receiving the expected robot. I pressed the number as instructed, intending to tell them to remove the number, knowing it probably wouldn't matter. The kind gentlemen asked me about my car, you know, to be sure we were on the same page. I replied with a "do you mean my 1980 Yamaha, or my 1989 Honda?" He chuckled and said "it must be the Honda; what model is that?" I replied honestly with "the 1500cc Valkyrie Tourer."
</p><p>
Then he hung up.
</p><p>
I repeated the exercise during a period of boredom, but this time just kindly told the woman who asked me about my car that I didn't own a car and wasn't planning to buy one, and asked if she'd remove me from their list. She apologized, said it was a done deal and politely hung up. The calls stopped, but only for the rest of the week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
I do n't own a car , just a couple of motorcycles .
I ignored the calls ( usually ignore calls from " unknown number " or even just numbers I do n't know ) at first , but they came twice a day...to an office desk phone...to which I had no actual ( e.g. , phone directory ) relationship .
I eventually answered one , receiving the expected robot .
I pressed the number as instructed , intending to tell them to remove the number , knowing it probably would n't matter .
The kind gentlemen asked me about my car , you know , to be sure we were on the same page .
I replied with a " do you mean my 1980 Yamaha , or my 1989 Honda ?
" He chuckled and said " it must be the Honda ; what model is that ?
" I replied honestly with " the 1500cc Valkyrie Tourer .
" Then he hung up .
I repeated the exercise during a period of boredom , but this time just kindly told the woman who asked me about my car that I did n't own a car and was n't planning to buy one , and asked if she 'd remove me from their list .
She apologized , said it was a done deal and politely hung up .
The calls stopped , but only for the rest of the week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
I don't own a car, just a couple of motorcycles.
I ignored the calls (usually ignore calls from "unknown number" or even just numbers I don't know) at first, but they came twice a day...to an office desk phone...to which I had no actual (e.g., phone directory) relationship.
I eventually answered one, receiving the expected robot.
I pressed the number as instructed, intending to tell them to remove the number, knowing it probably wouldn't matter.
The kind gentlemen asked me about my car, you know, to be sure we were on the same page.
I replied with a "do you mean my 1980 Yamaha, or my 1989 Honda?
" He chuckled and said "it must be the Honda; what model is that?
" I replied honestly with "the 1500cc Valkyrie Tourer.
"

Then he hung up.
I repeated the exercise during a period of boredom, but this time just kindly told the woman who asked me about my car that I didn't own a car and wasn't planning to buy one, and asked if she'd remove me from their list.
She apologized, said it was a done deal and politely hung up.
The calls stopped, but only for the rest of the week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345749</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245149940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the hell is this guy doing when he posts?

His post takes a large amount of grey space and his text is jammed over to the right. Like it is formatted in some cockeyed way.

Stop it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell is this guy doing when he posts ?
His post takes a large amount of grey space and his text is jammed over to the right .
Like it is formatted in some cockeyed way .
Stop it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell is this guy doing when he posts?
His post takes a large amount of grey space and his text is jammed over to the right.
Like it is formatted in some cockeyed way.
Stop it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345125</id>
	<title>Great news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These bastards called me on my cell while I was in Montenegro! It probably cost me $12 just to hang up on them immediately! I am sooooo psyched that they are busted!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These bastards called me on my cell while I was in Montenegro !
It probably cost me $ 12 just to hang up on them immediately !
I am sooooo psyched that they are busted !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These bastards called me on my cell while I was in Montenegro!
It probably cost me $12 just to hang up on them immediately!
I am sooooo psyched that they are busted!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352341</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realize the whole Fox News thing is a running joke, but the joke is a retarded one.  It implies that Fox is somehow different than all the others based on its political bias.  That statement is almost entirely incorrect.  Fox News is no different from every other main stream media source with the exception that some of those other media sources may not agree with Fox News's particular flavor of political bias.</p><p>The implication of your statement is that other news sources are not politically biased.  You are not only wrong, you are staggeringly, mind numbingly, unbelievable wrong.  It just shows that you are unable to separate your political views from reality and the greater good.  It does not bother me that you can not separate your political views, that is what makes us human.  What bothers me is that you seem to utterly fail to understand that just because other news sources give you a version thats been tailored to only show you the thinks about your team that you like, it doesn't mean your team doesn't fuck up all the same.  What bothers me is the fact that you can not over come the 'its my team' mentality long enough to form an objective opinion about the subject matter at hand.  You are unable to be objective.  When people like you vote, it is not a wasted vote, it is a bought vote.  Perhaps not bought with currency that can be used but with the currency of your emotions through the use of not only flat out lies, but deception  and more commonly simple omission of details that actually do matter.  Fox News does this, no argument there.  What might be enlightening for you to one day learn is that so do the others.</p><p>If you belief that, you don't deserve the right to vote, and possibly don't deserve the right to make decisions for yourself since having such a belief makes you clearly a complete fucking idiot.</p><p>You don't have to believe Fox News ever.  You don't have to agree with them or their stories.  As with our right as Americans to free speech there is a responsibility of each citizen to not be a fucking idiot and blindly belief everything someone tells us, regardless of what tv channel, newspaper or retarded blog it comes from.  Stop being such a douchebag and being so blinded by your political blinders for long enough to realize 'your guys' are feeding you a bunch of bullshit half stories most of the time as well, or if you don't want to do that, at least stop pretending to have a clue.</p><p>The rest of us get tired of seeing the same retarded statement over and over again, years after the reason it came into being has been forgotten by the people who keep spewing it.  It just makes it obvious you're a pretentious trendy asshole without a clue, I personally find it more rewarding if its not so easy for me to figure you out by a single line post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realize the whole Fox News thing is a running joke , but the joke is a retarded one .
It implies that Fox is somehow different than all the others based on its political bias .
That statement is almost entirely incorrect .
Fox News is no different from every other main stream media source with the exception that some of those other media sources may not agree with Fox News 's particular flavor of political bias.The implication of your statement is that other news sources are not politically biased .
You are not only wrong , you are staggeringly , mind numbingly , unbelievable wrong .
It just shows that you are unable to separate your political views from reality and the greater good .
It does not bother me that you can not separate your political views , that is what makes us human .
What bothers me is that you seem to utterly fail to understand that just because other news sources give you a version thats been tailored to only show you the thinks about your team that you like , it does n't mean your team does n't fuck up all the same .
What bothers me is the fact that you can not over come the 'its my team ' mentality long enough to form an objective opinion about the subject matter at hand .
You are unable to be objective .
When people like you vote , it is not a wasted vote , it is a bought vote .
Perhaps not bought with currency that can be used but with the currency of your emotions through the use of not only flat out lies , but deception and more commonly simple omission of details that actually do matter .
Fox News does this , no argument there .
What might be enlightening for you to one day learn is that so do the others.If you belief that , you do n't deserve the right to vote , and possibly do n't deserve the right to make decisions for yourself since having such a belief makes you clearly a complete fucking idiot.You do n't have to believe Fox News ever .
You do n't have to agree with them or their stories .
As with our right as Americans to free speech there is a responsibility of each citizen to not be a fucking idiot and blindly belief everything someone tells us , regardless of what tv channel , newspaper or retarded blog it comes from .
Stop being such a douchebag and being so blinded by your political blinders for long enough to realize 'your guys ' are feeding you a bunch of bullshit half stories most of the time as well , or if you do n't want to do that , at least stop pretending to have a clue.The rest of us get tired of seeing the same retarded statement over and over again , years after the reason it came into being has been forgotten by the people who keep spewing it .
It just makes it obvious you 're a pretentious trendy asshole without a clue , I personally find it more rewarding if its not so easy for me to figure you out by a single line post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realize the whole Fox News thing is a running joke, but the joke is a retarded one.
It implies that Fox is somehow different than all the others based on its political bias.
That statement is almost entirely incorrect.
Fox News is no different from every other main stream media source with the exception that some of those other media sources may not agree with Fox News's particular flavor of political bias.The implication of your statement is that other news sources are not politically biased.
You are not only wrong, you are staggeringly, mind numbingly, unbelievable wrong.
It just shows that you are unable to separate your political views from reality and the greater good.
It does not bother me that you can not separate your political views, that is what makes us human.
What bothers me is that you seem to utterly fail to understand that just because other news sources give you a version thats been tailored to only show you the thinks about your team that you like, it doesn't mean your team doesn't fuck up all the same.
What bothers me is the fact that you can not over come the 'its my team' mentality long enough to form an objective opinion about the subject matter at hand.
You are unable to be objective.
When people like you vote, it is not a wasted vote, it is a bought vote.
Perhaps not bought with currency that can be used but with the currency of your emotions through the use of not only flat out lies, but deception  and more commonly simple omission of details that actually do matter.
Fox News does this, no argument there.
What might be enlightening for you to one day learn is that so do the others.If you belief that, you don't deserve the right to vote, and possibly don't deserve the right to make decisions for yourself since having such a belief makes you clearly a complete fucking idiot.You don't have to believe Fox News ever.
You don't have to agree with them or their stories.
As with our right as Americans to free speech there is a responsibility of each citizen to not be a fucking idiot and blindly belief everything someone tells us, regardless of what tv channel, newspaper or retarded blog it comes from.
Stop being such a douchebag and being so blinded by your political blinders for long enough to realize 'your guys' are feeding you a bunch of bullshit half stories most of the time as well, or if you don't want to do that, at least stop pretending to have a clue.The rest of us get tired of seeing the same retarded statement over and over again, years after the reason it came into being has been forgotten by the people who keep spewing it.
It just makes it obvious you're a pretentious trendy asshole without a clue, I personally find it more rewarding if its not so easy for me to figure you out by a single line post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346125</id>
	<title>This wouldn't have taken so long to crack...</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1245155880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it wasn't for the asinine toll-free registration process here.  Being as toll-free numbers are registered through "Responsible Organizations (RespOrgs)" - which is an oxymoron to be kind - rather than anything resembling a centralized registry, it is insanely difficult to find out who is actually behind a given toll-free number.  RespOrgs have no obligation - indeed they often say they are not allowed - to disclose even a company name or mailing address behind a toll-free number.  And with the absurd number of RespOrgs for the toll-free system, by the time someone is able to file a complaint with a RespOrg regarding a toll-free number the company has already changed numbers and RespOrgs (at which point the first RespOrg might not even <i>have the data</i> for the first number anymore).<br> <br>
Why on earth this is acceptable - especially when traditional numbers are registered and traceable - is beyond me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was n't for the asinine toll-free registration process here .
Being as toll-free numbers are registered through " Responsible Organizations ( RespOrgs ) " - which is an oxymoron to be kind - rather than anything resembling a centralized registry , it is insanely difficult to find out who is actually behind a given toll-free number .
RespOrgs have no obligation - indeed they often say they are not allowed - to disclose even a company name or mailing address behind a toll-free number .
And with the absurd number of RespOrgs for the toll-free system , by the time someone is able to file a complaint with a RespOrg regarding a toll-free number the company has already changed numbers and RespOrgs ( at which point the first RespOrg might not even have the data for the first number anymore ) .
Why on earth this is acceptable - especially when traditional numbers are registered and traceable - is beyond me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it wasn't for the asinine toll-free registration process here.
Being as toll-free numbers are registered through "Responsible Organizations (RespOrgs)" - which is an oxymoron to be kind - rather than anything resembling a centralized registry, it is insanely difficult to find out who is actually behind a given toll-free number.
RespOrgs have no obligation - indeed they often say they are not allowed - to disclose even a company name or mailing address behind a toll-free number.
And with the absurd number of RespOrgs for the toll-free system, by the time someone is able to file a complaint with a RespOrg regarding a toll-free number the company has already changed numbers and RespOrgs (at which point the first RespOrg might not even have the data for the first number anymore).
Why on earth this is acceptable - especially when traditional numbers are registered and traceable - is beyond me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345149</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245184320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You Americans amaze me - you let everyone see your Bush but totally freak out when a nipple is exposed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You Americans amaze me - you let everyone see your Bush but totally freak out when a nipple is exposed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You Americans amaze me - you let everyone see your Bush but totally freak out when a nipple is exposed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>pitterpatter</author>
	<datestamp>1245086520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.
I don't have a car.</p></div><p> That's fun.</p><p>It was obvious to me for the exact opposite reason.  I had five cars.  And the youngest of them had been out of warranty for at least 5 years.  When I gave them the VIN for the '56 Ford (after thoroughly harassing them for not knowing the VIN on the warranty they were calling about) they wouldn't accept it - not enough characters.  They hung up when I said it was a '56.  On the next call, they hung up when I gave them a motorcycle VIN.  Then they flooded my line with calls - well, 3-5/day - and hung up whenever I tried to connect with a person.  Then I started screening calls, and they finally went away. </p><p> I understand that this is an over-reaction, but if they were sentenced to death and I were an executioner I think I would cheerfully pull the switch to fry their brains.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon .
I do n't have a car .
That 's fun.It was obvious to me for the exact opposite reason .
I had five cars .
And the youngest of them had been out of warranty for at least 5 years .
When I gave them the VIN for the '56 Ford ( after thoroughly harassing them for not knowing the VIN on the warranty they were calling about ) they would n't accept it - not enough characters .
They hung up when I said it was a '56 .
On the next call , they hung up when I gave them a motorcycle VIN .
Then they flooded my line with calls - well , 3-5/day - and hung up whenever I tried to connect with a person .
Then I started screening calls , and they finally went away .
I understand that this is an over-reaction , but if they were sentenced to death and I were an executioner I think I would cheerfully pull the switch to fry their brains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.
I don't have a car.
That's fun.It was obvious to me for the exact opposite reason.
I had five cars.
And the youngest of them had been out of warranty for at least 5 years.
When I gave them the VIN for the '56 Ford (after thoroughly harassing them for not knowing the VIN on the warranty they were calling about) they wouldn't accept it - not enough characters.
They hung up when I said it was a '56.
On the next call, they hung up when I gave them a motorcycle VIN.
Then they flooded my line with calls - well, 3-5/day - and hung up whenever I tried to connect with a person.
Then I started screening calls, and they finally went away.
I understand that this is an over-reaction, but if they were sentenced to death and I were an executioner I think I would cheerfully pull the switch to fry their brains.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345477</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>sdnoob</author>
	<datestamp>1245145320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>same here...  no car. haven't had one in over a decade, either. but still multiple calls *and texts* to cell phones, as well as postcards in the mail advising me that my warranty was expiring.</p><p>odd, that not only have i not had a car in the last 12 years, but i've never paid more than $500 for one either... $300-500 cars don't come with warranties.</p><p>so, my standard reply to these guys has been "I seem to have misplaced my car. If you can find it and get it back to me, I'd be more than happy to carry a warranty on it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>same here... no car .
have n't had one in over a decade , either .
but still multiple calls * and texts * to cell phones , as well as postcards in the mail advising me that my warranty was expiring.odd , that not only have i not had a car in the last 12 years , but i 've never paid more than $ 500 for one either... $ 300-500 cars do n't come with warranties.so , my standard reply to these guys has been " I seem to have misplaced my car .
If you can find it and get it back to me , I 'd be more than happy to carry a warranty on it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>same here...  no car.
haven't had one in over a decade, either.
but still multiple calls *and texts* to cell phones, as well as postcards in the mail advising me that my warranty was expiring.odd, that not only have i not had a car in the last 12 years, but i've never paid more than $500 for one either... $300-500 cars don't come with warranties.so, my standard reply to these guys has been "I seem to have misplaced my car.
If you can find it and get it back to me, I'd be more than happy to carry a warranty on it.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344677</id>
	<title>So helpful!</title>
	<author>seebs</author>
	<datestamp>1245091080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, this means no money for the people who got the illegal calls, even though they owe us all probably $1,500 a pop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , this means no money for the people who got the illegal calls , even though they owe us all probably $ 1,500 a pop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, this means no money for the people who got the illegal calls, even though they owe us all probably $1,500 a pop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344253</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't the greedy crooks ever learn....</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1245086340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, because it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , because it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, because it works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346191</id>
	<title>Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Bluesman</author>
	<datestamp>1245157320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone needs to compile a list of these companies, their owners, and their owners' phone numbers.  There are a few things I'd like to try to sell to Christopher Cowart, and I'm sure I'm not alone.</p><p>"Good morning, Mr. Cowart.  This morning I have a beautiful jogging stroller for sale that has fallen into disuse since my children have gotten older.  No?  Ok, talk to you this afternoon!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone needs to compile a list of these companies , their owners , and their owners ' phone numbers .
There are a few things I 'd like to try to sell to Christopher Cowart , and I 'm sure I 'm not alone .
" Good morning , Mr. Cowart. This morning I have a beautiful jogging stroller for sale that has fallen into disuse since my children have gotten older .
No ? Ok , talk to you this afternoon !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone needs to compile a list of these companies, their owners, and their owners' phone numbers.
There are a few things I'd like to try to sell to Christopher Cowart, and I'm sure I'm not alone.
"Good morning, Mr. Cowart.  This morning I have a beautiful jogging stroller for sale that has fallen into disuse since my children have gotten older.
No?  Ok, talk to you this afternoon!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345839</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>SL Baur</author>
	<datestamp>1245151620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information". I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said. But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.</p></div><p>They're shitting you.  I didn't have valid caller id from their call.  I'm not sure how I could have identified the voice I ended up talking to.  Gee, it sounds female, that eliminates 50\%<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>The police wouldn't followup when an eyewitness had 6 of 7 digits of the license of the driver who hit &amp; runned me and totaled my first new car. Make/model/location out of 10 possible vehicles should mean something, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they could n't do anything because " I did n't provide them enough information " .
I gave them the time of day , the CID , and what the robo greeting said .
But I guess because I did n't talk to a human , it did n't count.They 're shitting you .
I did n't have valid caller id from their call .
I 'm not sure how I could have identified the voice I ended up talking to .
Gee , it sounds female , that eliminates 50 \ % ...The police would n't followup when an eyewitness had 6 of 7 digits of the license of the driver who hit &amp; runned me and totaled my first new car .
Make/model/location out of 10 possible vehicles should mean something , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".
I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said.
But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.They're shitting you.
I didn't have valid caller id from their call.
I'm not sure how I could have identified the voice I ended up talking to.
Gee, it sounds female, that eliminates 50\% ...The police wouldn't followup when an eyewitness had 6 of 7 digits of the license of the driver who hit &amp; runned me and totaled my first new car.
Make/model/location out of 10 possible vehicles should mean something, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346489</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245160320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"</p><p>*click*</p></div><p>Damn!  They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" May I ask who I 'm speaking to ? " * click * Damn !
They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"*click*Damn!
They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344073</id>
	<title>What a deal</title>
	<author>pitterpatter</author>
	<datestamp>1245084480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't happen to a more deserving bunch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28357091</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245167580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cause they are already on the line with other suckers and even more suckers will be robocalled in a few secs, your call is pretty worthless, whether you are genuinely interested or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cause they are already on the line with other suckers and even more suckers will be robocalled in a few secs , your call is pretty worthless , whether you are genuinely interested or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cause they are already on the line with other suckers and even more suckers will be robocalled in a few secs, your call is pretty worthless, whether you are genuinely interested or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173</id>
	<title>I never got it...</title>
	<author>Zakabog</author>
	<datestamp>1245085440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never understood how these scams work, they hang up on you once you ask anything, but don't you need to know where to send your money? If you just give them credit card info won't they need an address for their merchant account or whatever credit card processing system they have? Why does it take so long to catch these people, isn't it possible to just follow the money to the scammers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood how these scams work , they hang up on you once you ask anything , but do n't you need to know where to send your money ?
If you just give them credit card info wo n't they need an address for their merchant account or whatever credit card processing system they have ?
Why does it take so long to catch these people , is n't it possible to just follow the money to the scammers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood how these scams work, they hang up on you once you ask anything, but don't you need to know where to send your money?
If you just give them credit card info won't they need an address for their merchant account or whatever credit card processing system they have?
Why does it take so long to catch these people, isn't it possible to just follow the money to the scammers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345085</id>
	<title>Scrap metal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245183180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I keep trying to tell you! I don't want to extend the warranty on my 1984 Ford Tempo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep trying to tell you !
I do n't want to extend the warranty on my 1984 Ford Tempo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep trying to tell you!
I don't want to extend the warranty on my 1984 Ford Tempo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351117</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245180240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bought a cheap pre-paid phone, walked out of the store and immediately got my car warranty call. Damn they're good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bought a cheap pre-paid phone , walked out of the store and immediately got my car warranty call .
Damn they 're good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bought a cheap pre-paid phone, walked out of the store and immediately got my car warranty call.
Damn they're good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344763</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>HeronBlademaster</author>
	<datestamp>1245092160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They didn't know, they just guessed.</p><p>For example, I got these calls when I had a 2002 Civic, but the car wasn't under my name; I kept getting the calls after I returned the car to my parents and bought myself a 2009 Civic Hybrid... there's no way that's out of warranty already<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)  I tried getting someone on the line (to mess with them) after that, but all I got was a perpetually ringing line.  Nobody ever answered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't know , they just guessed.For example , I got these calls when I had a 2002 Civic , but the car was n't under my name ; I kept getting the calls after I returned the car to my parents and bought myself a 2009 Civic Hybrid... there 's no way that 's out of warranty already ; ) I tried getting someone on the line ( to mess with them ) after that , but all I got was a perpetually ringing line .
Nobody ever answered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't know, they just guessed.For example, I got these calls when I had a 2002 Civic, but the car wasn't under my name; I kept getting the calls after I returned the car to my parents and bought myself a 2009 Civic Hybrid... there's no way that's out of warranty already ;)  I tried getting someone on the line (to mess with them) after that, but all I got was a perpetually ringing line.
Nobody ever answered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347713</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245167940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>so I can only guess somehow they been digging through <b>public records</b> about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete <b>invasion of privacy</b> to me!!</p></div><p>Do you even read what you type? I boldfaced the relevant items for whoever modded you insightful...</p><p>And they didn't know much, if anything, about your car. They sent me a postcard saying the factory warranty on my car was about to expire. Well, the factory warranty on that car expired about 12 years or 150,000 miles ago, which they could have known simply by checking the year/model they had on the freaking postcard. And I never owned it new, I had bought it used, so it didn't have any warranty, and had actually been totalled out by a drunk driver about 6 months before they started bugging me.</p><p>Sometimes they dig up public records like vehicle registration, then they send a form letter to everyone with a GM car, a slightly different one to everyone with a Honda, etc. Other times they just send a blanket "your car warranty has expired" letter, like the one they sent to my 3 year old nephew.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations .
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me !
! Do you even read what you type ?
I boldfaced the relevant items for whoever modded you insightful...And they did n't know much , if anything , about your car .
They sent me a postcard saying the factory warranty on my car was about to expire .
Well , the factory warranty on that car expired about 12 years or 150,000 miles ago , which they could have known simply by checking the year/model they had on the freaking postcard .
And I never owned it new , I had bought it used , so it did n't have any warranty , and had actually been totalled out by a drunk driver about 6 months before they started bugging me.Sometimes they dig up public records like vehicle registration , then they send a form letter to everyone with a GM car , a slightly different one to everyone with a Honda , etc .
Other times they just send a blanket " your car warranty has expired " letter , like the one they sent to my 3 year old nephew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations.
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!
!Do you even read what you type?
I boldfaced the relevant items for whoever modded you insightful...And they didn't know much, if anything, about your car.
They sent me a postcard saying the factory warranty on my car was about to expire.
Well, the factory warranty on that car expired about 12 years or 150,000 miles ago, which they could have known simply by checking the year/model they had on the freaking postcard.
And I never owned it new, I had bought it used, so it didn't have any warranty, and had actually been totalled out by a drunk driver about 6 months before they started bugging me.Sometimes they dig up public records like vehicle registration, then they send a form letter to everyone with a GM car, a slightly different one to everyone with a Honda, etc.
Other times they just send a blanket "your car warranty has expired" letter, like the one they sent to my 3 year old nephew.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350255</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1245177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate ta take the wind out of your sails, but...</p><p>Pigs find truffles by smell; I can't imagine that they couldn't do much the same with acorns.</p><p>And a broken digital watch doesn't tell the correct time - or any time - without batteries.</p><p>You might take up Quantum Mechanics Analogies, intstead:  Due to quantum fluctuations, a Fox News article from an alternate reality got posted<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate ta take the wind out of your sails , but...Pigs find truffles by smell ; I ca n't imagine that they could n't do much the same with acorns.And a broken digital watch does n't tell the correct time - or any time - without batteries.You might take up Quantum Mechanics Analogies , intstead : Due to quantum fluctuations , a Fox News article from an alternate reality got posted ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate ta take the wind out of your sails, but...Pigs find truffles by smell; I can't imagine that they couldn't do much the same with acorns.And a broken digital watch doesn't tell the correct time - or any time - without batteries.You might take up Quantum Mechanics Analogies, intstead:  Due to quantum fluctuations, a Fox News article from an alternate reality got posted ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352805</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Feel proud. This might be your first baby step on the path to becoming a free thinking individual.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Feel proud .
This might be your first baby step on the path to becoming a free thinking individual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feel proud.
This might be your first baby step on the path to becoming a free thinking individual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347035</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1245164100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They actually do that all the time.  You just don't know about it because you don't get your news about fox news from fox news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They actually do that all the time .
You just do n't know about it because you do n't get your news about fox news from fox news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They actually do that all the time.
You just don't know about it because you don't get your news about fox news from fox news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344627</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Solandri</author>
	<datestamp>1245090600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't know.  My warranty expired 2 years ago and I get the cards and calls too.  They seem to be mailing/calling people based on year model of the car and normal manufacturer's warranty, then continuing the mailings for several more years in case you got an extended warranty.  People figure, "wow, they know when my warranty is up, so they must have gotten some "inside" info from the manufacturer, so they must be legit."  It's just a variant of the <a href="http://www.skepdic.com/perfectprediction.html" title="skepdic.com">perfect prediction scam</a> [skepdic.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't know .
My warranty expired 2 years ago and I get the cards and calls too .
They seem to be mailing/calling people based on year model of the car and normal manufacturer 's warranty , then continuing the mailings for several more years in case you got an extended warranty .
People figure , " wow , they know when my warranty is up , so they must have gotten some " inside " info from the manufacturer , so they must be legit .
" It 's just a variant of the perfect prediction scam [ skepdic.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't know.
My warranty expired 2 years ago and I get the cards and calls too.
They seem to be mailing/calling people based on year model of the car and normal manufacturer's warranty, then continuing the mailings for several more years in case you got an extended warranty.
People figure, "wow, they know when my warranty is up, so they must have gotten some "inside" info from the manufacturer, so they must be legit.
"  It's just a variant of the perfect prediction scam [skepdic.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345959</id>
	<title>Get them to pay you?</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1245153540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Yes, I have a car like that, and unfortunately it spontaneously combusted/disintegrated/got eaten by rust ten minutes ago. I'd like to make use of my warranty (you just said that it \_was about to\_ expire, right, so I still have it right now)?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Yes , I have a car like that , and unfortunately it spontaneously combusted/disintegrated/got eaten by rust ten minutes ago .
I 'd like to make use of my warranty ( you just said that it \ _was about to \ _ expire , right , so I still have it right now ) ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Yes, I have a car like that, and unfortunately it spontaneously combusted/disintegrated/got eaten by rust ten minutes ago.
I'd like to make use of my warranty (you just said that it \_was about to\_ expire, right, so I still have it right now)?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346347</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>muttsnutman</author>
	<datestamp>1245159060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the good old days, I just used to change my car when the ashtray was full, but now nobody is smoking.
Is the filling rate the same for cigarette butts versus gum wrappers and if not does anyone know the conversion factor?  I mean I really don't want my warranty to expire...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the good old days , I just used to change my car when the ashtray was full , but now nobody is smoking .
Is the filling rate the same for cigarette butts versus gum wrappers and if not does anyone know the conversion factor ?
I mean I really do n't want my warranty to expire.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the good old days, I just used to change my car when the ashtray was full, but now nobody is smoking.
Is the filling rate the same for cigarette butts versus gum wrappers and if not does anyone know the conversion factor?
I mean I really don't want my warranty to expire...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346563</id>
	<title>Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245160860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in the UK and I get regular calls from scammers in Florida telling me I've won a free holiday.  My current ploy is to see how long I can keep them on the line with a combination of heavy breathing and confused grunting (Scooby Doo style).  The current record is 163 seconds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in the UK and I get regular calls from scammers in Florida telling me I 've won a free holiday .
My current ploy is to see how long I can keep them on the line with a combination of heavy breathing and confused grunting ( Scooby Doo style ) .
The current record is 163 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in the UK and I get regular calls from scammers in Florida telling me I've won a free holiday.
My current ploy is to see how long I can keep them on the line with a combination of heavy breathing and confused grunting (Scooby Doo style).
The current record is 163 seconds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354323</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245149940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.</p></div><p>Another point for representation by lottery rather than representation by rich enough to afford becoming a politician but not smart or ambitious enough to do something useful with your life.</p><p>(I'm only half serious, but...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them , and to add insult to injury , it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.Another point for representation by lottery rather than representation by rich enough to afford becoming a politician but not smart or ambitious enough to do something useful with your life .
( I 'm only half serious , but... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.Another point for representation by lottery rather than representation by rich enough to afford becoming a politician but not smart or ambitious enough to do something useful with your life.
(I'm only half serious, but...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344373</id>
	<title>Seems easy to draw an evidence trail here...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245087960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about an Android/iPhone app to report that the last call you received smelled seriously fishy?  You could note down what it entailed, when enough keywords match enough other reports the FTC starts prodding the phone company.</p><p>Another possibility would be a way to get a fake credit card number which would come back declined, but would also flag the account as possibly fraudulent.  Might help with spam and phishing, as well as this kind of fraud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about an Android/iPhone app to report that the last call you received smelled seriously fishy ?
You could note down what it entailed , when enough keywords match enough other reports the FTC starts prodding the phone company.Another possibility would be a way to get a fake credit card number which would come back declined , but would also flag the account as possibly fraudulent .
Might help with spam and phishing , as well as this kind of fraud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about an Android/iPhone app to report that the last call you received smelled seriously fishy?
You could note down what it entailed, when enough keywords match enough other reports the FTC starts prodding the phone company.Another possibility would be a way to get a fake credit card number which would come back declined, but would also flag the account as possibly fraudulent.
Might help with spam and phishing, as well as this kind of fraud.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344281</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245086640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better idea.</p><p>Dumbasses who actually got conned by this were all Republicans. These guys had to have a few people be dumb enough to fall for this, otherwise they wouldn't be so big.</p><p>This news is relevant to 98\% of their viewership.</p><p>"cum hoc ergo propter hoc"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better idea.Dumbasses who actually got conned by this were all Republicans .
These guys had to have a few people be dumb enough to fall for this , otherwise they would n't be so big.This news is relevant to 98 \ % of their viewership .
" cum hoc ergo propter hoc " ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better idea.Dumbasses who actually got conned by this were all Republicans.
These guys had to have a few people be dumb enough to fall for this, otherwise they wouldn't be so big.This news is relevant to 98\% of their viewership.
"cum hoc ergo propter hoc" ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344691</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245091200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>... dumb enough<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</i></p><p><i>"cum hoc ergo propter hoc"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</i> </p><p>Or, properly, "<b>post</b> hoc ergo propter hoc"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... dumb enough .... " cum hoc ergo propter hoc " ; ) Or , properly , " post hoc ergo propter hoc "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... dumb enough ...."cum hoc ergo propter hoc" ;) Or, properly, "post hoc ergo propter hoc"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346421</id>
	<title>Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1245159720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly!  They should be ashamed that ANY scam of this nature still exists.  I mean, by the very basic model of the system there has to be a link between the scammer and the scamee for money to flow, so why can't the authorities just follow the money to its destination?  Its like a bank robber who leaves his calling card at the scene of every crime.  Would this type of thing work door-to-door?  No!  Why should virtual scams and thievery be any more tolerated?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
They should be ashamed that ANY scam of this nature still exists .
I mean , by the very basic model of the system there has to be a link between the scammer and the scamee for money to flow , so why ca n't the authorities just follow the money to its destination ?
Its like a bank robber who leaves his calling card at the scene of every crime .
Would this type of thing work door-to-door ?
No ! Why should virtual scams and thievery be any more tolerated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
They should be ashamed that ANY scam of this nature still exists.
I mean, by the very basic model of the system there has to be a link between the scammer and the scamee for money to flow, so why can't the authorities just follow the money to its destination?
Its like a bank robber who leaves his calling card at the scene of every crime.
Would this type of thing work door-to-door?
No!  Why should virtual scams and thievery be any more tolerated?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</id>
	<title>My call...</title>
	<author>AKAImBatman</author>
	<datestamp>1245084420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...went something like this.</p><p>"WTH is this? Scammers?"</p><p>*Press 1*</p><p><i>"Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?"</i></p><p>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"</p><p>*click*</p><p>--</p><p>After receiving (and hanging up on) a few more of these calls, I can't say I'm sorry to see their asses getting handed to them in court.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...went something like this .
" WTH is this ?
Scammers ? " * Press 1 * " Hello , what 's the make of your vehicle ?
" " May I ask who I 'm speaking to ?
" * click * --After receiving ( and hanging up on ) a few more of these calls , I ca n't say I 'm sorry to see their asses getting handed to them in court .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...went something like this.
"WTH is this?
Scammers?"*Press 1*"Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?
""May I ask who I'm speaking to?
"*click*--After receiving (and hanging up on) a few more of these calls, I can't say I'm sorry to see their asses getting handed to them in court.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348275</id>
	<title>Re:Amazing that Chuck Schumer was the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245170640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why did it take this long to put a stop to this?</i></p><p>It required effort.  Mystery solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did it take this long to put a stop to this ? It required effort .
Mystery solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did it take this long to put a stop to this?It required effort.
Mystery solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344259</id>
	<title>My scathing email to the FTC...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245086400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I happen to work, as a contractor, for a VERY high-level (think: one step from the POTUSA) office and I was receiving these calls on my gov issued cell phone. I wrote a nice letter to the FTC about 1.5 months ago. They never even got back to me and I left them my full address. Is there anybody out there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I happen to work , as a contractor , for a VERY high-level ( think : one step from the POTUSA ) office and I was receiving these calls on my gov issued cell phone .
I wrote a nice letter to the FTC about 1.5 months ago .
They never even got back to me and I left them my full address .
Is there anybody out there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I happen to work, as a contractor, for a VERY high-level (think: one step from the POTUSA) office and I was receiving these calls on my gov issued cell phone.
I wrote a nice letter to the FTC about 1.5 months ago.
They never even got back to me and I left them my full address.
Is there anybody out there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345309</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1245142920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526182,00.html" title="foxnews.com">Best Jammie Thomas re-trial coverage in the media</a> [foxnews.com] This report ticks all the boxes:<br>- What happened on the original trial<br>- Why there is a retrial<br>- What MediaSentry did<br>- The dirty things the RIAA did (finally someone in the mass media pointing this out!)<br>- Camara's new strategy</p><p>and more.</p><p>The writer of this article did his homework thoroughly. The RIAA gets a good bludgeoning here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best Jammie Thomas re-trial coverage in the media [ foxnews.com ] This report ticks all the boxes : - What happened on the original trial- Why there is a retrial- What MediaSentry did- The dirty things the RIAA did ( finally someone in the mass media pointing this out !
) - Camara 's new strategyand more.The writer of this article did his homework thoroughly .
The RIAA gets a good bludgeoning here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best Jammie Thomas re-trial coverage in the media [foxnews.com] This report ticks all the boxes:- What happened on the original trial- Why there is a retrial- What MediaSentry did- The dirty things the RIAA did (finally someone in the mass media pointing this out!
)- Camara's new strategyand more.The writer of this article did his homework thoroughly.
The RIAA gets a good bludgeoning here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346537</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245160740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, reporting these guys is usually useless.  They spoof the caller ID info (this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped) and the associates, if you get one, are well trained in not telling you anything that would be useful on a report.  Full name?  Nope.  Company name? Nope.  Address? Hell no.  Return number?  Nope.</p><p>In reality, if they were taking it seriously all the FTC would need is your phone number, the time of the call, and your provider.  Then they could get records from the provider (ie. AT&amp;T) and know where the call came from, who it's registered to, and so on.  The phone companies make damn sure to have that info, because otherwise they couldn't get paid.</p><p>Which, of course, is why the FTC were able to move so fast once Senatorman got called.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , reporting these guys is usually useless .
They spoof the caller ID info ( this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped ) and the associates , if you get one , are well trained in not telling you anything that would be useful on a report .
Full name ?
Nope. Company name ?
Nope. Address ?
Hell no .
Return number ?
Nope.In reality , if they were taking it seriously all the FTC would need is your phone number , the time of the call , and your provider .
Then they could get records from the provider ( ie .
AT&amp;T ) and know where the call came from , who it 's registered to , and so on .
The phone companies make damn sure to have that info , because otherwise they could n't get paid.Which , of course , is why the FTC were able to move so fast once Senatorman got called .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, reporting these guys is usually useless.
They spoof the caller ID info (this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped) and the associates, if you get one, are well trained in not telling you anything that would be useful on a report.
Full name?
Nope.  Company name?
Nope.  Address?
Hell no.
Return number?
Nope.In reality, if they were taking it seriously all the FTC would need is your phone number, the time of the call, and your provider.
Then they could get records from the provider (ie.
AT&amp;T) and know where the call came from, who it's registered to, and so on.
The phone companies make damn sure to have that info, because otherwise they couldn't get paid.Which, of course, is why the FTC were able to move so fast once Senatorman got called.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345795</id>
	<title>Withheld</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1245150600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And now the number withheld calls begin... Mostly calling at 2:00AM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And now the number withheld calls begin... Mostly calling at 2 : 00AM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And now the number withheld calls begin... Mostly calling at 2:00AM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344483</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>ouachiski</author>
	<datestamp>1245089160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew it was a scam when I asked them if they could insure my 10 yr old truck with 175k miles and a blown cylinder and they said they could...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it was a scam when I asked them if they could insure my 10 yr old truck with 175k miles and a blown cylinder and they said they could.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it was a scam when I asked them if they could insure my 10 yr old truck with 175k miles and a blown cylinder and they said they could...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079</id>
	<title>The only robot call I got</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245084480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asked if I had seen a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. Sandra O'Connor... or something like that.  I forget.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asked if I had seen a .. Sandra O'Connor... or something like that .
I forget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asked if I had seen a .. Sandra O'Connor... or something like that.
I forget.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346777</id>
	<title>Self Help Script.....</title>
	<author>SomeoneGotMyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1245162480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Feel free to embellish on this script when you have a little time to play with their minds. Most of the dialog is paraphrased.</p><p>Caller: Hello, Mr. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_. Our records show your auto warranty is soon to expire.<br>You: I wasn't aware of that.<br>Caller: Would you like to renew your warranty now?<br>You: I suppose I should if it's going to expire soon. What do you need, the VIN number?<br>Caller: Yes sir.<br>You: Hold on. The car is in the garage. I need to go there.<br>Caller: OK sir.<br>(wait about one or two minutes, or until they wonder where you are)<br>You: OK, I got my shoes on, now I can go out to the garage. It's a detached garage.<br>Caller: Great, sir.<br>(wait another one or two minutes, or until they get concerned again)<br>Caller: Sir?<br>You: Hold on, I'm unlocking the door to the garage now.<br>(Wait 15 to 30 seconds. Idle chat with them to keep them on the line)<br>You: Shoot. This is the shed key. It looks the same as the garage key. I always get them mixed up. Let me go get the garage key. I really want this warranty.<br>Caller: Very well, sir.<br>(Wait one to three minutes. Idle chat to keep on the line. Maybe pretend to talk about issues with your lawn, etc. as you "walk back" to get your key)<br>You: OK. That was the right key this time. I'm at the car.<br>(At this point you can try, but you may be pushing their patience, to say "The car key is in the house. Let me get it.")<br>You: OK. I can read the VIN at the windshield.<br>Caller: Go ahead, sir.<br>You: 1... W... G... K... N or M...<br>Caller: Which one is it sir, N or M?<br>You: It's tough to see in here. Let me go get a flashlight.<br>(You decide if your flashlight is near you in the garage or WAYYYY back in the house)<br>You: M... 3... 4... H... J... 4... 2... 6... 8... 2... 0....<br>You: Can you repeat that back for me?<br>Caller: That's OK sir. I can't find your vehicle. What is it?<br>You: It's a 1974 VW Super Beetle<br>Caller: Don't you have any newer cars?<br>You: Nope. This is my first car and it still runs great for me. (You may even want to say it's been handed down to you as your first car and it still runs well for you.)<br>Caller: I'm sorry sir, we can't help you at this time. We'll take you off our call list.<br>You: OK. Sorry about that.<br>Caller: **Click**, or "Have a good day sir."</p><p>I did the last six lines for one of them once and I never received another call from any auto warranty company. They apparently took me off their list when I convinced them I only had the Beetle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Feel free to embellish on this script when you have a little time to play with their minds .
Most of the dialog is paraphrased.Caller : Hello , Mr. \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _. Our records show your auto warranty is soon to expire.You : I was n't aware of that.Caller : Would you like to renew your warranty now ? You : I suppose I should if it 's going to expire soon .
What do you need , the VIN number ? Caller : Yes sir.You : Hold on .
The car is in the garage .
I need to go there.Caller : OK sir .
( wait about one or two minutes , or until they wonder where you are ) You : OK , I got my shoes on , now I can go out to the garage .
It 's a detached garage.Caller : Great , sir .
( wait another one or two minutes , or until they get concerned again ) Caller : Sir ? You : Hold on , I 'm unlocking the door to the garage now .
( Wait 15 to 30 seconds .
Idle chat with them to keep them on the line ) You : Shoot .
This is the shed key .
It looks the same as the garage key .
I always get them mixed up .
Let me go get the garage key .
I really want this warranty.Caller : Very well , sir .
( Wait one to three minutes .
Idle chat to keep on the line .
Maybe pretend to talk about issues with your lawn , etc .
as you " walk back " to get your key ) You : OK. That was the right key this time .
I 'm at the car .
( At this point you can try , but you may be pushing their patience , to say " The car key is in the house .
Let me get it .
" ) You : OK. I can read the VIN at the windshield.Caller : Go ahead , sir.You : 1... W... G... K... N or M...Caller : Which one is it sir , N or M ? You : It 's tough to see in here .
Let me go get a flashlight .
( You decide if your flashlight is near you in the garage or WAYYYY back in the house ) You : M... 3... 4... H... J... 4... 2... 6... 8... 2... 0....You : Can you repeat that back for me ? Caller : That 's OK sir .
I ca n't find your vehicle .
What is it ? You : It 's a 1974 VW Super BeetleCaller : Do n't you have any newer cars ? You : Nope .
This is my first car and it still runs great for me .
( You may even want to say it 's been handed down to you as your first car and it still runs well for you .
) Caller : I 'm sorry sir , we ca n't help you at this time .
We 'll take you off our call list.You : OK. Sorry about that.Caller : * * Click * * , or " Have a good day sir .
" I did the last six lines for one of them once and I never received another call from any auto warranty company .
They apparently took me off their list when I convinced them I only had the Beetle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Feel free to embellish on this script when you have a little time to play with their minds.
Most of the dialog is paraphrased.Caller: Hello, Mr. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_. Our records show your auto warranty is soon to expire.You: I wasn't aware of that.Caller: Would you like to renew your warranty now?You: I suppose I should if it's going to expire soon.
What do you need, the VIN number?Caller: Yes sir.You: Hold on.
The car is in the garage.
I need to go there.Caller: OK sir.
(wait about one or two minutes, or until they wonder where you are)You: OK, I got my shoes on, now I can go out to the garage.
It's a detached garage.Caller: Great, sir.
(wait another one or two minutes, or until they get concerned again)Caller: Sir?You: Hold on, I'm unlocking the door to the garage now.
(Wait 15 to 30 seconds.
Idle chat with them to keep them on the line)You: Shoot.
This is the shed key.
It looks the same as the garage key.
I always get them mixed up.
Let me go get the garage key.
I really want this warranty.Caller: Very well, sir.
(Wait one to three minutes.
Idle chat to keep on the line.
Maybe pretend to talk about issues with your lawn, etc.
as you "walk back" to get your key)You: OK. That was the right key this time.
I'm at the car.
(At this point you can try, but you may be pushing their patience, to say "The car key is in the house.
Let me get it.
")You: OK. I can read the VIN at the windshield.Caller: Go ahead, sir.You: 1... W... G... K... N or M...Caller: Which one is it sir, N or M?You: It's tough to see in here.
Let me go get a flashlight.
(You decide if your flashlight is near you in the garage or WAYYYY back in the house)You: M... 3... 4... H... J... 4... 2... 6... 8... 2... 0....You: Can you repeat that back for me?Caller: That's OK sir.
I can't find your vehicle.
What is it?You: It's a 1974 VW Super BeetleCaller: Don't you have any newer cars?You: Nope.
This is my first car and it still runs great for me.
(You may even want to say it's been handed down to you as your first car and it still runs well for you.
)Caller: I'm sorry sir, we can't help you at this time.
We'll take you off our call list.You: OK. Sorry about that.Caller: **Click**, or "Have a good day sir.
"I did the last six lines for one of them once and I never received another call from any auto warranty company.
They apparently took me off their list when I convinced them I only had the Beetle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344179</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245085560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to pay for every incoming call even if they just leave a message and these assholes would call several times a day.</p><p>Burn these fuckers at the stake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to pay for every incoming call even if they just leave a message and these assholes would call several times a day.Burn these fuckers at the stake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to pay for every incoming call even if they just leave a message and these assholes would call several times a day.Burn these fuckers at the stake!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344901</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>fatalwall</author>
	<datestamp>1245094080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they were sending me things in the mail for over and over saying my warranty was about to expire when i had just purchased the car three months earlier and it still had 5 years left on the manufacturers warranty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they were sending me things in the mail for over and over saying my warranty was about to expire when i had just purchased the car three months earlier and it still had 5 years left on the manufacturers warranty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they were sending me things in the mail for over and over saying my warranty was about to expire when i had just purchased the car three months earlier and it still had 5 years left on the manufacturers warranty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358655</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245271020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation. (Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.)</i> </p><p>You're forgetting they should add on federal, state and any local tax at the maximum allowable rate. Even if they've already paid tax on it.</p><p>Hah! captcha = bleeder</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation .
( Note " gross income " before expenses and payroll and the like .
) You 're forgetting they should add on federal , state and any local tax at the maximum allowable rate .
Even if they 've already paid tax on it.Hah !
captcha = bleeder</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation.
(Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.
) You're forgetting they should add on federal, state and any local tax at the maximum allowable rate.
Even if they've already paid tax on it.Hah!
captcha = bleeder</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245093060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is really odd. I am assuming d*** is a censored damn, but if you're so concerned about damn, why did you not censor hell?</p><p>I mean Jesus fucking Christ!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is really odd .
I am assuming d * * * is a censored damn , but if you 're so concerned about damn , why did you not censor hell ? I mean Jesus fucking Christ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is really odd.
I am assuming d*** is a censored damn, but if you're so concerned about damn, why did you not censor hell?I mean Jesus fucking Christ!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351723</id>
	<title>then there is the whole...</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1245182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...fact that aftermarket warranties themselves are a big scam even when they are "legitimate".<br>You are better off figuring out how much one of these things are, and putting the same amount money monthly in an interest bearing account to save for a rainy day. If you never need it, at least you still have your money<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) If you pay them it's gone. If your car breaks you are no worse off since you have the money.</p><p>Remember they only do this because it's a money maker. It's not to help you avoid repair bills. With these guys you are still paying the repair bill whether or not your car breaks.</p><p>-Viz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...fact that aftermarket warranties themselves are a big scam even when they are " legitimate " .You are better off figuring out how much one of these things are , and putting the same amount money monthly in an interest bearing account to save for a rainy day .
If you never need it , at least you still have your money ; ) If you pay them it 's gone .
If your car breaks you are no worse off since you have the money.Remember they only do this because it 's a money maker .
It 's not to help you avoid repair bills .
With these guys you are still paying the repair bill whether or not your car breaks.-Viz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...fact that aftermarket warranties themselves are a big scam even when they are "legitimate".You are better off figuring out how much one of these things are, and putting the same amount money monthly in an interest bearing account to save for a rainy day.
If you never need it, at least you still have your money ;) If you pay them it's gone.
If your car breaks you are no worse off since you have the money.Remember they only do this because it's a money maker.
It's not to help you avoid repair bills.
With these guys you are still paying the repair bill whether or not your car breaks.-Viz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344709</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1245091380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>

My favorite was the guy who said I needed wiper blades replaced to go with the brakes dragging.


When Czars are outlawed, only outlaws will have Czars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite was the guy who said I needed wiper blades replaced to go with the brakes dragging .
When Czars are outlawed , only outlaws will have Czars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

My favorite was the guy who said I needed wiper blades replaced to go with the brakes dragging.
When Czars are outlawed, only outlaws will have Czars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344217</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>dmomo</author>
	<datestamp>1245085920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually led them on for quite a while by asking dumb naive questions.  I was trying to go so far as to find out where to send the check.  I think they wanted a credit card number.  I did get a company name at one point, but it was something generic.  It didn't come up when I later googled it. I write the name down but must have tossed the paper.</p><p>I wasted a little of their time, and had fun doing it.  Does that count for anything?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually led them on for quite a while by asking dumb naive questions .
I was trying to go so far as to find out where to send the check .
I think they wanted a credit card number .
I did get a company name at one point , but it was something generic .
It did n't come up when I later googled it .
I write the name down but must have tossed the paper.I wasted a little of their time , and had fun doing it .
Does that count for anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually led them on for quite a while by asking dumb naive questions.
I was trying to go so far as to find out where to send the check.
I think they wanted a credit card number.
I did get a company name at one point, but it was something generic.
It didn't come up when I later googled it.
I write the name down but must have tossed the paper.I wasted a little of their time, and had fun doing it.
Does that count for anything?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299</id>
	<title>Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss?</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1245086940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are all rather familiar with the notion of "cost of doing business" when it comes to fines associated with illegal and/or unlawful activities in business.  Quite often, the fines and other punishment are so small and insignificant that it is not a deterrent but is instead factored into the cost of doing business.</p><p>This warranty scam activity was very VERY obvious that it would be shut down at some point.  The fact that it went on for as long as it did was pretty amazing all by itself.  Who was responsible for the slow response on this?  Further, the engineers of this scam made a LOT of money from this.  When compared against the fines and other punishments so far, was there a net gain or loss for these perpetrators?</p><p>My point here is that if there was a significant net gain, then the perpetrators won.  It doesn't matter that they were shut down.  That was a matter of time.  It took long enough that they somehow managed to pull in a LOT of money.  How much of it did they get to keep?  Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation.  (Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.)  And they need to extract this money directly from the perpetrators.  If there are any legal prohibitions that will prevent the government from issuing such punitive measures, then you can see very clearly and plainly what is wrong with U.S. laws governing business.  (It would be an effective license to commit fraud and be shielded from punishment.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are all rather familiar with the notion of " cost of doing business " when it comes to fines associated with illegal and/or unlawful activities in business .
Quite often , the fines and other punishment are so small and insignificant that it is not a deterrent but is instead factored into the cost of doing business.This warranty scam activity was very VERY obvious that it would be shut down at some point .
The fact that it went on for as long as it did was pretty amazing all by itself .
Who was responsible for the slow response on this ?
Further , the engineers of this scam made a LOT of money from this .
When compared against the fines and other punishments so far , was there a net gain or loss for these perpetrators ? My point here is that if there was a significant net gain , then the perpetrators won .
It does n't matter that they were shut down .
That was a matter of time .
It took long enough that they somehow managed to pull in a LOT of money .
How much of it did they get to keep ?
Frankly , I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation .
( Note " gross income " before expenses and payroll and the like .
) And they need to extract this money directly from the perpetrators .
If there are any legal prohibitions that will prevent the government from issuing such punitive measures , then you can see very clearly and plainly what is wrong with U.S. laws governing business .
( It would be an effective license to commit fraud and be shielded from punishment .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are all rather familiar with the notion of "cost of doing business" when it comes to fines associated with illegal and/or unlawful activities in business.
Quite often, the fines and other punishment are so small and insignificant that it is not a deterrent but is instead factored into the cost of doing business.This warranty scam activity was very VERY obvious that it would be shut down at some point.
The fact that it went on for as long as it did was pretty amazing all by itself.
Who was responsible for the slow response on this?
Further, the engineers of this scam made a LOT of money from this.
When compared against the fines and other punishments so far, was there a net gain or loss for these perpetrators?My point here is that if there was a significant net gain, then the perpetrators won.
It doesn't matter that they were shut down.
That was a matter of time.
It took long enough that they somehow managed to pull in a LOT of money.
How much of it did they get to keep?
Frankly, I think the government needs to take ALL gross income from the operation.
(Note "gross income" before expenses and payroll and the like.
)  And they need to extract this money directly from the perpetrators.
If there are any legal prohibitions that will prevent the government from issuing such punitive measures, then you can see very clearly and plainly what is wrong with U.S. laws governing business.
(It would be an effective license to commit fraud and be shielded from punishment.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345589</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Asclepius99</author>
	<datestamp>1245147540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only problem I have with your theory is that I've gotten many calls from them and I don't own a car (nor have I in the past).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem I have with your theory is that I 've gotten many calls from them and I do n't own a car ( nor have I in the past ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem I have with your theory is that I've gotten many calls from them and I don't own a car (nor have I in the past).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348257</id>
	<title>Re:They call, they call, they call</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1245170580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't have to buy "Y's" you fool... Pat Sajak gives them away for free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have to buy " Y 's " you fool... Pat Sajak gives them away for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have to buy "Y's" you fool... Pat Sajak gives them away for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28353639</id>
	<title>Old cars</title>
	<author>gsmraxe</author>
	<datestamp>1245146700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was getting these 3x a week...One day, I figured I'd play along.  My 3 cars consist of:</p><p>1968 Ford Mustang<br>1966 Ford Mustang<br>1968 Chevy Suburban</p><p>I told them the make and models, several of them hung up...One asshole, started an argument that I didn't have cars that old...He eventually told me to fuck off and hung up.  I laughed for days about that.</p><p>Now if I could only get rid of the carpet cleaning ad, as I have no carpets, ripped them all out and tiled the entire house...But they call when I'm not at home and don't leave a number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was getting these 3x a week...One day , I figured I 'd play along .
My 3 cars consist of : 1968 Ford Mustang1966 Ford Mustang1968 Chevy SuburbanI told them the make and models , several of them hung up...One asshole , started an argument that I did n't have cars that old...He eventually told me to fuck off and hung up .
I laughed for days about that.Now if I could only get rid of the carpet cleaning ad , as I have no carpets , ripped them all out and tiled the entire house...But they call when I 'm not at home and do n't leave a number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was getting these 3x a week...One day, I figured I'd play along.
My 3 cars consist of:1968 Ford Mustang1966 Ford Mustang1968 Chevy SuburbanI told them the make and models, several of them hung up...One asshole, started an argument that I didn't have cars that old...He eventually told me to fuck off and hung up.
I laughed for days about that.Now if I could only get rid of the carpet cleaning ad, as I have no carpets, ripped them all out and tiled the entire house...But they call when I'm not at home and don't leave a number.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</id>
	<title>Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245084900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.<br>I don't have a car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.I do n't have a car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was kinda obvious to me that this was a scam when they told me my warranty for the car was due to expire soon.I don't have a car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344967</id>
	<title>Hang 'em</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245095040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only way to ever put a stop to sub-human scum like these people are public executions.  Oh, and make sure the drop isn't more than a few inches, wouldn't want the rope to break their neck and let them off easy.  Pure scum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to ever put a stop to sub-human scum like these people are public executions .
Oh , and make sure the drop is n't more than a few inches , would n't want the rope to break their neck and let them off easy .
Pure scum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to ever put a stop to sub-human scum like these people are public executions.
Oh, and make sure the drop isn't more than a few inches, wouldn't want the rope to break their neck and let them off easy.
Pure scum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348343</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>qengho</author>
	<datestamp>1245171000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"</p><p>*click*</p></div><p>Damn!  They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?</p></div><p>No, it was because he used "who" instead of "whom."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" May I ask who I 'm speaking to ? " * click * Damn !
They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition ? No , it was because he used " who " instead of " whom .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"*click*Damn!
They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?No, it was because he used "who" instead of "whom.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345887</id>
	<title>Re:The only robot call I got</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1245152460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck you, asshole!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you , asshole !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you, asshole!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348965</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1245173040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL! <br> <br>
Well honestly I didn't even know I wrote hell until you pointed it out.<br> <br>
Sometimes I randomly choose to censor my profanity and sometimes I don't.  Just depends on my mood I guess.<br> <br>
KRUNK!</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL !
Well honestly I did n't even know I wrote hell until you pointed it out .
Sometimes I randomly choose to censor my profanity and sometimes I do n't .
Just depends on my mood I guess .
KRUNK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!
Well honestly I didn't even know I wrote hell until you pointed it out.
Sometimes I randomly choose to censor my profanity and sometimes I don't.
Just depends on my mood I guess.
KRUNK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349519</id>
	<title>Re:stop them in less than 2 years next time</title>
	<author>Workaphobia</author>
	<datestamp>1245174900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, this has just embarrassed the government beyond reason. We might as well have no telemarketing restrictions or FTC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this has just embarrassed the government beyond reason .
We might as well have no telemarketing restrictions or FTC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this has just embarrassed the government beyond reason.
We might as well have no telemarketing restrictions or FTC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344415</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245088440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>obvious to me that this was a scam</p></div></blockquote><p>Unfortunately, not obvious to my grandmother.  I wanted to fucking kill these people.  6 years ago, I had my grandmother co-sign on a truck to help me get affordable payments.  Everything went very well, was perfect on the payments, and eventually sold the truck.</p><p>I would get yelled at ALL THE TIME about these people that kept calling my grandmother about the "truck" and trying to sell her a warranty.  It was MY responsibility to get them to stop calling and update their records to get rid of her phone number.</p><p>Of course that was impossible.  Could I even explain it to her so that she would understand it was a scam?  No.  She would forget about that within a week, just in time for the next phone call.</p><p>The only possible way these people could be more annoying is to annoy somebody else that I CAN'T ignore to the point she would drive me batshit crazy.</p><p>I hope they publish this pendeho's address in the court documents.  I feel like a road trip.......</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>obvious to me that this was a scamUnfortunately , not obvious to my grandmother .
I wanted to fucking kill these people .
6 years ago , I had my grandmother co-sign on a truck to help me get affordable payments .
Everything went very well , was perfect on the payments , and eventually sold the truck.I would get yelled at ALL THE TIME about these people that kept calling my grandmother about the " truck " and trying to sell her a warranty .
It was MY responsibility to get them to stop calling and update their records to get rid of her phone number.Of course that was impossible .
Could I even explain it to her so that she would understand it was a scam ?
No. She would forget about that within a week , just in time for the next phone call.The only possible way these people could be more annoying is to annoy somebody else that I CA N'T ignore to the point she would drive me batshit crazy.I hope they publish this pendeho 's address in the court documents .
I feel like a road trip...... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>obvious to me that this was a scamUnfortunately, not obvious to my grandmother.
I wanted to fucking kill these people.
6 years ago, I had my grandmother co-sign on a truck to help me get affordable payments.
Everything went very well, was perfect on the payments, and eventually sold the truck.I would get yelled at ALL THE TIME about these people that kept calling my grandmother about the "truck" and trying to sell her a warranty.
It was MY responsibility to get them to stop calling and update their records to get rid of her phone number.Of course that was impossible.
Could I even explain it to her so that she would understand it was a scam?
No.  She would forget about that within a week, just in time for the next phone call.The only possible way these people could be more annoying is to annoy somebody else that I CAN'T ignore to the point she would drive me batshit crazy.I hope they publish this pendeho's address in the court documents.
I feel like a road trip.......
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344961</id>
	<title>Public Execution</title>
	<author>n3v</author>
	<datestamp>1245094920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did we ever get rid of those anyways??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did we ever get rid of those anyways ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did we ever get rid of those anyways?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245090060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They didn't know a thing about your warranty.  Or your car.  The call folks all the time who either have no cars, or ancient cars that haven't had warranties of any kind for years and years and tell them 'your warranty is about to expire'.</p><p>They are cold calls.  They haven't done any research. Some of the better ones use the same cold reading techniques that psychics do to trick you into thinking they know what they are talking about.  They are hoping you are dumb enough to provide the information to them when the call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't know a thing about your warranty .
Or your car .
The call folks all the time who either have no cars , or ancient cars that have n't had warranties of any kind for years and years and tell them 'your warranty is about to expire'.They are cold calls .
They have n't done any research .
Some of the better ones use the same cold reading techniques that psychics do to trick you into thinking they know what they are talking about .
They are hoping you are dumb enough to provide the information to them when the call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't know a thing about your warranty.
Or your car.
The call folks all the time who either have no cars, or ancient cars that haven't had warranties of any kind for years and years and tell them 'your warranty is about to expire'.They are cold calls.
They haven't done any research.
Some of the better ones use the same cold reading techniques that psychics do to trick you into thinking they know what they are talking about.
They are hoping you are dumb enough to provide the information to them when the call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344985</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>JimboFBX</author>
	<datestamp>1245095280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everyone who says they guessed is dead wrong. They dont guess they just spam out the cards. I've gotten a couple of these cards in the mail starting from when my car is less than a year old and I have a 10 year power train warranty.<br> <br>

The crooks are the ones giving them this information. They should be thrown in jail because obviously they give out my personal contact information without discretion to if I care or not. If a man was passing out your address and the location of all the locks in your house to hobos who walked by him who would you arrest? The hobos or the man?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone who says they guessed is dead wrong .
They dont guess they just spam out the cards .
I 've gotten a couple of these cards in the mail starting from when my car is less than a year old and I have a 10 year power train warranty .
The crooks are the ones giving them this information .
They should be thrown in jail because obviously they give out my personal contact information without discretion to if I care or not .
If a man was passing out your address and the location of all the locks in your house to hobos who walked by him who would you arrest ?
The hobos or the man ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone who says they guessed is dead wrong.
They dont guess they just spam out the cards.
I've gotten a couple of these cards in the mail starting from when my car is less than a year old and I have a 10 year power train warranty.
The crooks are the ones giving them this information.
They should be thrown in jail because obviously they give out my personal contact information without discretion to if I care or not.
If a man was passing out your address and the location of all the locks in your house to hobos who walked by him who would you arrest?
The hobos or the man?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28353669</id>
	<title>I wouldn't mind the calls...</title>
	<author>hachikyu</author>
	<datestamp>1245146820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if I owned a car. I am curious how many others are in the same boat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if I owned a car .
I am curious how many others are in the same boat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if I owned a car.
I am curious how many others are in the same boat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344893</id>
	<title>Call them back if you like</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245094020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Network Foundations LLC.
33 North LaSalle, Suite 2110
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel: 	(312) 235-2400
Fax: 	(312) 276-8780
Email: 	sales@networkfoundations.com

Florida Profit Corporation
VOICE TOUCH, INC.
Filing Information
Document Number	P07000116212
FEI/EIN Number	261281522
Date Filed	10/23/2007
State	FL
Status	ACTIVE
Effective Date	10/23/2007
Principal Address
22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW
DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US
Mailing Address
22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW
DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US

M Dunne
1209 Sunland Rd
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
(386) 253-7131


Cant really confirm the last number.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Network Foundations LLC .
33 North LaSalle , Suite 2110 Chicago , IL 60602 Tel : ( 312 ) 235-2400 Fax : ( 312 ) 276-8780 Email : sales @ networkfoundations.com Florida Profit Corporation VOICE TOUCH , INC . Filing Information Document Number P07000116212 FEI/EIN Number 261281522 Date Filed 10/23/2007 State FL Status ACTIVE Effective Date 10/23/2007 Principal Address 22 PROMENADE AT LION 'S PAW DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US Mailing Address 22 PROMENADE AT LION 'S PAW DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US M Dunne 1209 Sunland Rd Daytona Beach , FL 32114 ( 386 ) 253-7131 Cant really confirm the last number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Network Foundations LLC.
33 North LaSalle, Suite 2110
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel: 	(312) 235-2400
Fax: 	(312) 276-8780
Email: 	sales@networkfoundations.com

Florida Profit Corporation
VOICE TOUCH, INC.
Filing Information
Document Number	P07000116212
FEI/EIN Number	261281522
Date Filed	10/23/2007
State	FL
Status	ACTIVE
Effective Date	10/23/2007
Principal Address
22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW
DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US
Mailing Address
22 PROMENADE AT LION'S PAW
DAYTONA BEACH FL 32124 US

M Dunne
1209 Sunland Rd
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
(386) 253-7131


Cant really confirm the last number.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345803</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245150780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because its robodial.<br>they have a few operators, but they call hundreds of lines  at once.<br>they never have enough operators(i wonder why, not enough demoralized crackheads locally?), so you get disconnected usually upon tryin to connect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because its robodial.they have a few operators , but they call hundreds of lines at once.they never have enough operators ( i wonder why , not enough demoralized crackheads locally ?
) , so you get disconnected usually upon tryin to connect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because its robodial.they have a few operators, but they call hundreds of lines  at once.they never have enough operators(i wonder why, not enough demoralized crackheads locally?
), so you get disconnected usually upon tryin to connect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351945</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, it's done, but what was the net gain/loss</title>
	<author>HenryKoren</author>
	<datestamp>1245183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These criminals were actively wasting millions of peoples time, even if they did not succumb to getting charged by them, the time it takes to deal with this is significant.</p><p>I received nearly 50 calls from these criminals.  I spent a lot of time reporting them to donotcall.  This time could have been much better spent elsewhere.</p><p>Last time they called, I baited them by starting to read a bogus credit card to them, but asked for them and managed to speak to a manager of some sort, who refused to identify the company.  I managed to hurl as many insults at them as possible before the click.  That was satisfying, but nowhere near as satisfying as seeing justice happen.</p><p>I'm overjoyed they have been caught, I had become very cynical about all the time I spent reporting them.  Hopefully my reports will help to bolster the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These criminals were actively wasting millions of peoples time , even if they did not succumb to getting charged by them , the time it takes to deal with this is significant.I received nearly 50 calls from these criminals .
I spent a lot of time reporting them to donotcall .
This time could have been much better spent elsewhere.Last time they called , I baited them by starting to read a bogus credit card to them , but asked for them and managed to speak to a manager of some sort , who refused to identify the company .
I managed to hurl as many insults at them as possible before the click .
That was satisfying , but nowhere near as satisfying as seeing justice happen.I 'm overjoyed they have been caught , I had become very cynical about all the time I spent reporting them .
Hopefully my reports will help to bolster the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These criminals were actively wasting millions of peoples time, even if they did not succumb to getting charged by them, the time it takes to deal with this is significant.I received nearly 50 calls from these criminals.
I spent a lot of time reporting them to donotcall.
This time could have been much better spent elsewhere.Last time they called, I baited them by starting to read a bogus credit card to them, but asked for them and managed to speak to a manager of some sort, who refused to identify the company.
I managed to hurl as many insults at them as possible before the click.
That was satisfying, but nowhere near as satisfying as seeing justice happen.I'm overjoyed they have been caught, I had become very cynical about all the time I spent reporting them.
Hopefully my reports will help to bolster the case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</id>
	<title>Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245084960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm so conflicted...  Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?  I don't know how to feel!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so conflicted... Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way ?
I do n't know how to feel !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so conflicted...  Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?
I don't know how to feel!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344089</id>
	<title>I have an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245084660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sentence them to be raped in the ass by Elephants until such time as they have worked off their scam "earnings"... at minimum wage... for Utah strippers... and they shall hope and pray the Elephants are heavy tippers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sentence them to be raped in the ass by Elephants until such time as they have worked off their scam " earnings " ... at minimum wage... for Utah strippers... and they shall hope and pray the Elephants are heavy tippers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sentence them to be raped in the ass by Elephants until such time as they have worked off their scam "earnings"... at minimum wage... for Utah strippers... and they shall hope and pray the Elephants are heavy tippers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155</id>
	<title>And the new scam de jour....</title>
	<author>timpdx</author>
	<datestamp>1245085260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff. On my cell, on the do not call list. So it begins again.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its funny , as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month , I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff .
On my cell , on the do not call list .
So it begins again.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its funny, as soon as the car warranty scammers stopped calling last month, I now get robocalls for some cheapo health care ripoff.
On my cell, on the do not call list.
So it begins again.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354863</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245153120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I wonder how this information is made available?</i> </p><p>Must be registration stuff. I got a card for the '87 truck I got inn California) from a guy in Oklahoma. How extended do these warranties get?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how this information is made available ?
Must be registration stuff .
I got a card for the '87 truck I got inn California ) from a guy in Oklahoma .
How extended do these warranties get ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how this information is made available?
Must be registration stuff.
I got a card for the '87 truck I got inn California) from a guy in Oklahoma.
How extended do these warranties get?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1245085500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's some potential explanations:</p><p>Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.<br>Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's some potential explanations : Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.Even a stopped clock is right twice a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's some potential explanations:Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099</id>
	<title>I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Darkk</author>
	<datestamp>1245084660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get the stupid post cards too.. Makes me wonder how they know my Honda warranty is going to expire? Despite the fact I purchased the extended manufactor 2 year warranty? The knew about the first year but didn't know about the extended warranty so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations. Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!!</p><p>However, I never recieved one phone call from folks like that... Hmmm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get the stupid post cards too.. Makes me wonder how they know my Honda warranty is going to expire ?
Despite the fact I purchased the extended manufactor 2 year warranty ?
The knew about the first year but did n't know about the extended warranty so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations .
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me !
! However , I never recieved one phone call from folks like that... Hmmm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get the stupid post cards too.. Makes me wonder how they know my Honda warranty is going to expire?
Despite the fact I purchased the extended manufactor 2 year warranty?
The knew about the first year but didn't know about the extended warranty so I can only guess somehow they been digging through public records about car purchases or ca registurations.
Sounds like complete invasion of privacy to me!
!However, I never recieved one phone call from folks like that... Hmmm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345371</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245143820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm so conflicted...  Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?  I don't know how to feel!</p></div><p>Well, Fox News does this quite often. You see, some weasels on the net as well as some of their TV competition (who they are destroying in the ratings mind you) don't like Fox. As such, they smear them. Then disingenuous folks like you pretend to have watched Fox News, even though you haven't, and bitch about them. This is sometimes due to ignorance, other times due to ideology. At which point, you repeat things "you have read about" or "heard about" from various sources with no credibility, or in the case of some outlets, just making stuff up works too. Fox News is by far the most accurate (whether you like the style of some of their commentators or not, yeah, I hate Hannity, too). The one thing that gets me more than anything is Fox will do corrections on those rare occasions when they get something wrong, and get bashed for being honest enough to correct it. All news media makes the occasional mistake (some more than others). Is Fox the only one we are going to piss on about it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so conflicted... Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way ?
I do n't know how to feel ! Well , Fox News does this quite often .
You see , some weasels on the net as well as some of their TV competition ( who they are destroying in the ratings mind you ) do n't like Fox .
As such , they smear them .
Then disingenuous folks like you pretend to have watched Fox News , even though you have n't , and bitch about them .
This is sometimes due to ignorance , other times due to ideology .
At which point , you repeat things " you have read about " or " heard about " from various sources with no credibility , or in the case of some outlets , just making stuff up works too .
Fox News is by far the most accurate ( whether you like the style of some of their commentators or not , yeah , I hate Hannity , too ) .
The one thing that gets me more than anything is Fox will do corrections on those rare occasions when they get something wrong , and get bashed for being honest enough to correct it .
All news media makes the occasional mistake ( some more than others ) .
Is Fox the only one we are going to piss on about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so conflicted...  Fox News actually reporting something that affects me in a positive way?
I don't know how to feel!Well, Fox News does this quite often.
You see, some weasels on the net as well as some of their TV competition (who they are destroying in the ratings mind you) don't like Fox.
As such, they smear them.
Then disingenuous folks like you pretend to have watched Fox News, even though you haven't, and bitch about them.
This is sometimes due to ignorance, other times due to ideology.
At which point, you repeat things "you have read about" or "heard about" from various sources with no credibility, or in the case of some outlets, just making stuff up works too.
Fox News is by far the most accurate (whether you like the style of some of their commentators or not, yeah, I hate Hannity, too).
The one thing that gets me more than anything is Fox will do corrections on those rare occasions when they get something wrong, and get bashed for being honest enough to correct it.
All news media makes the occasional mistake (some more than others).
Is Fox the only one we are going to piss on about it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344779</id>
	<title>Re:Fox news?!</title>
	<author>discorob3</author>
	<datestamp>1245092400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you hit the nail on the head with that one! I am conflicted as well... Those fuckers used to call me and leave voicemail on my expensive as fuck ripoff AT and T prepaid cell phone...</htmltext>
<tokenext>you hit the nail on the head with that one !
I am conflicted as well... Those fuckers used to call me and leave voicemail on my expensive as fuck ripoff AT and T prepaid cell phone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you hit the nail on the head with that one!
I am conflicted as well... Those fuckers used to call me and leave voicemail on my expensive as fuck ripoff AT and T prepaid cell phone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345901</id>
	<title>Better than Do Not Call List</title>
	<author>Ada\_Rules</author>
	<datestamp>1245152880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some of these places clearly do not respect a do not call list policy as they call even when you are on the national list and/or call  back even after repeated requests to go on their own do not call list. <p>
However, they do appear to maintain a crazy list. Drag the call out. Speak slowly and say lots of things that don't make sense. You get to have a little fun and and up on their do not call list...Well, that or the democrats elect you speaker of the house. Either way you win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of these places clearly do not respect a do not call list policy as they call even when you are on the national list and/or call back even after repeated requests to go on their own do not call list .
However , they do appear to maintain a crazy list .
Drag the call out .
Speak slowly and say lots of things that do n't make sense .
You get to have a little fun and and up on their do not call list...Well , that or the democrats elect you speaker of the house .
Either way you win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of these places clearly do not respect a do not call list policy as they call even when you are on the national list and/or call  back even after repeated requests to go on their own do not call list.
However, they do appear to maintain a crazy list.
Drag the call out.
Speak slowly and say lots of things that don't make sense.
You get to have a little fun and and up on their do not call list...Well, that or the democrats elect you speaker of the house.
Either way you win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28362797</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>jhsiao</author>
	<datestamp>1245259920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want to keep these jokers on the line, just sound old and confused.<p>
Their scam targets the elderly. You might have sounded too young so they just hung up. But if you pretend you're over 65, hard of hearing, and confused how your 2007 Buick Regal's warranty is expiring, they'll be all over you.</p><p>
And that's when you string them along for hours...once they do find out that you're not actually old, their fury at being strung along for so long would be delicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to keep these jokers on the line , just sound old and confused .
Their scam targets the elderly .
You might have sounded too young so they just hung up .
But if you pretend you 're over 65 , hard of hearing , and confused how your 2007 Buick Regal 's warranty is expiring , they 'll be all over you .
And that 's when you string them along for hours...once they do find out that you 're not actually old , their fury at being strung along for so long would be delicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to keep these jokers on the line, just sound old and confused.
Their scam targets the elderly.
You might have sounded too young so they just hung up.
But if you pretend you're over 65, hard of hearing, and confused how your 2007 Buick Regal's warranty is expiring, they'll be all over you.
And that's when you string them along for hours...once they do find out that you're not actually old, their fury at being strung along for so long would be delicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344199</id>
	<title>While waiting for the FTC to do anything...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245085740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdwC8vG4eY&amp;feature=channel\_page" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">This was a fun way to deal with them.</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was a fun way to deal with them .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was a fun way to deal with them.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350575</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1245178260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".</p></div><p>Clearly from the story here, the missing information was telling them you're a US senator or someone important enough to get their asses fired.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they could n't do anything because " I did n't provide them enough information " .Clearly from the story here , the missing information was telling them you 're a US senator or someone important enough to get their asses fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information".Clearly from the story here, the missing information was telling them you're a US senator or someone important enough to get their asses fired.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344865</id>
	<title>Re:I love scammers..they're so much entertainment.</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1245093720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Worse:</p><p>"We'll send you your free USB powered Turnip Twaddler as soon as you say yes to the following:<br>*generic disclaimer, obviously recorded, speeding up to quadruple <i>billyourcompanyphone50permonth</i> chipmunk mutterings about applicable states* Are you cool with that?"</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/eyes glazed over.</p><p>"That was hard to hear, but it didn't sound like it matt... Hang on, did you say something about billing my company? I'm not authoriz"</p><p><b>*click*</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Worse : " We 'll send you your free USB powered Turnip Twaddler as soon as you say yes to the following : * generic disclaimer , obviously recorded , speeding up to quadruple billyourcompanyphone50permonth chipmunk mutterings about applicable states * Are you cool with that ?
" /eyes glazed over .
" That was hard to hear , but it did n't sound like it matt... Hang on , did you say something about billing my company ?
I 'm not authoriz " * click *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worse:"We'll send you your free USB powered Turnip Twaddler as soon as you say yes to the following:*generic disclaimer, obviously recorded, speeding up to quadruple billyourcompanyphone50permonth chipmunk mutterings about applicable states* Are you cool with that?
" /eyes glazed over.
"That was hard to hear, but it didn't sound like it matt... Hang on, did you say something about billing my company?
I'm not authoriz"*click*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344933</id>
	<title>Amazing that Chuck Schumer was the only one</title>
	<author>Gary W. Longsine</author>
	<datestamp>1245094440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>These people robo dialed the hell out of the 202 area code, starting well over a year ago, and not ending until they were busted.  I sat in rooms in DC where I'd get this call, and a few minutes later someone else in the room got it, more than once.  There were, undoubtedly, many influential federal government employees, Congresspersons, Senators, an White House staffers also victimized by these calls to their cell phones, both government and private.  Why did it take this long to put a stop to this?  The world may never know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These people robo dialed the hell out of the 202 area code , starting well over a year ago , and not ending until they were busted .
I sat in rooms in DC where I 'd get this call , and a few minutes later someone else in the room got it , more than once .
There were , undoubtedly , many influential federal government employees , Congresspersons , Senators , an White House staffers also victimized by these calls to their cell phones , both government and private .
Why did it take this long to put a stop to this ?
The world may never know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These people robo dialed the hell out of the 202 area code, starting well over a year ago, and not ending until they were busted.
I sat in rooms in DC where I'd get this call, and a few minutes later someone else in the room got it, more than once.
There were, undoubtedly, many influential federal government employees, Congresspersons, Senators, an White House staffers also victimized by these calls to their cell phones, both government and private.
Why did it take this long to put a stop to this?
The world may never know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346155</id>
	<title>Anybody ever press  #2 at the menu?</title>
	<author>dfenstrate</author>
	<datestamp>1245156660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These guys called me several times. First couple of times I hung up on them.</p><p>Then I told an operator to never call me back, and she said she'd put me on the do not call list.</p><p>Then another guy called, I demanded "What's the name of your company?" immediately, and he said he'd put me on the do not call list and hung up.</p><p>Finally, I listened to the idiotic robo-message in it's entirety, and at the end it said press #2 to be removed from our calling list. So I did.</p><p>I haven't gotten a call from them since.</p><p>It seems their telemarketers are penalized for putting people on the do-not-call list, because they never did. Once I told the auto-dialer to do so, I never got a call back.</p><p>Does anyone else have a similar experience?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These guys called me several times .
First couple of times I hung up on them.Then I told an operator to never call me back , and she said she 'd put me on the do not call list.Then another guy called , I demanded " What 's the name of your company ?
" immediately , and he said he 'd put me on the do not call list and hung up.Finally , I listened to the idiotic robo-message in it 's entirety , and at the end it said press # 2 to be removed from our calling list .
So I did.I have n't gotten a call from them since.It seems their telemarketers are penalized for putting people on the do-not-call list , because they never did .
Once I told the auto-dialer to do so , I never got a call back.Does anyone else have a similar experience ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These guys called me several times.
First couple of times I hung up on them.Then I told an operator to never call me back, and she said she'd put me on the do not call list.Then another guy called, I demanded "What's the name of your company?
" immediately, and he said he'd put me on the do not call list and hung up.Finally, I listened to the idiotic robo-message in it's entirety, and at the end it said press #2 to be removed from our calling list.
So I did.I haven't gotten a call from them since.It seems their telemarketers are penalized for putting people on the do-not-call list, because they never did.
Once I told the auto-dialer to do so, I never got a call back.Does anyone else have a similar experience?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346893</id>
	<title>Yay!!!</title>
	<author>stuntpope</author>
	<datestamp>1245163200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've gotten several of the postcards and some phone calls back when I had a 2000 model car whose warranty was long-expired, and I understood straight away that it was a 3rd party company trying (deceptively, IMO) to get my business. When we purchased a new vehicle in 2008, and my wife got one of their phone calls 2 months later saying our warranty was going to expire that day unless she took action to extend it, she was understandably confused, especially since the caller claimed they were with Mazda. When she told the caller that she didn't know the VIN and she asked some questions, the caller hung up.</p><p>I'm really glad someone went after these scum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've gotten several of the postcards and some phone calls back when I had a 2000 model car whose warranty was long-expired , and I understood straight away that it was a 3rd party company trying ( deceptively , IMO ) to get my business .
When we purchased a new vehicle in 2008 , and my wife got one of their phone calls 2 months later saying our warranty was going to expire that day unless she took action to extend it , she was understandably confused , especially since the caller claimed they were with Mazda .
When she told the caller that she did n't know the VIN and she asked some questions , the caller hung up.I 'm really glad someone went after these scum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've gotten several of the postcards and some phone calls back when I had a 2000 model car whose warranty was long-expired, and I understood straight away that it was a 3rd party company trying (deceptively, IMO) to get my business.
When we purchased a new vehicle in 2008, and my wife got one of their phone calls 2 months later saying our warranty was going to expire that day unless she took action to extend it, she was understandably confused, especially since the caller claimed they were with Mazda.
When she told the caller that she didn't know the VIN and she asked some questions, the caller hung up.I'm really glad someone went after these scum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28353819</id>
	<title>Re:And the new scam de jour....</title>
	<author>infinite9</author>
	<datestamp>1245147480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I keep getting robocalls in spanish.  I speak french and japanese, but not spanish.  Can anyone tell me what these are?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep getting robocalls in spanish .
I speak french and japanese , but not spanish .
Can anyone tell me what these are ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep getting robocalls in spanish.
I speak french and japanese, but not spanish.
Can anyone tell me what these are?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346847</id>
	<title>Re:I get the stupid post cards too</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1245162840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't the auto warranty scam, but one of those calls was scarily accurate.  My wife had just got off the phone with me telling me that our fridge was leaking water and needed to be replaced.  (Came with the house and was quite old so it wasn't completely unexpected.)  Literally seconds after I hung up, my work phone rang.  "If you own your own home, you need to protect against major appliance failure..."  The scammers are spying on me!!!! (Do I need to wrap my phone in tin foil?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)  )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't the auto warranty scam , but one of those calls was scarily accurate .
My wife had just got off the phone with me telling me that our fridge was leaking water and needed to be replaced .
( Came with the house and was quite old so it was n't completely unexpected .
) Literally seconds after I hung up , my work phone rang .
" If you own your own home , you need to protect against major appliance failure... " The scammers are spying on me ! ! ! !
( Do I need to wrap my phone in tin foil ?
; - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't the auto warranty scam, but one of those calls was scarily accurate.
My wife had just got off the phone with me telling me that our fridge was leaking water and needed to be replaced.
(Came with the house and was quite old so it wasn't completely unexpected.
)  Literally seconds after I hung up, my work phone rang.
"If you own your own home, you need to protect against major appliance failure..."  The scammers are spying on me!!!!
(Do I need to wrap my phone in tin foil?
;-)  )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358361</id>
	<title>Does this happen in countries where telecom is....</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1245181620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a national service?</p><p>IIRC, Germany just has 'teh phone system'.  Would a public/state utility be as susceptible to this sort of abuse?  Would the gov't be more able to do something about it?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/non-rhetorical question</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a national service ? IIRC , Germany just has 'teh phone system' .
Would a public/state utility be as susceptible to this sort of abuse ?
Would the gov't be more able to do something about it ?
/non-rhetorical question</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a national service?IIRC, Germany just has 'teh phone system'.
Would a public/state utility be as susceptible to this sort of abuse?
Would the gov't be more able to do something about it?
/non-rhetorical question</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399</id>
	<title>Re:I never got it...</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1245088260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had an even stranger experience in the fifteen kabillion calls I've received from these douches (I work from home).  I get the call, I press '9' to be connected to an operator, and then I am instantly disconnected.  This happens over and over upon every call.  EXTREMELY frustrating...  <br> <br>
If you're gonna scam people why the hell don't you connect the d*** call?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had an even stranger experience in the fifteen kabillion calls I 've received from these douches ( I work from home ) .
I get the call , I press '9 ' to be connected to an operator , and then I am instantly disconnected .
This happens over and over upon every call .
EXTREMELY frustrating.. . If you 're gon na scam people why the hell do n't you connect the d * * * call ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had an even stranger experience in the fifteen kabillion calls I've received from these douches (I work from home).
I get the call, I press '9' to be connected to an operator, and then I am instantly disconnected.
This happens over and over upon every call.
EXTREMELY frustrating...   
If you're gonna scam people why the hell don't you connect the d*** call?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28355029</id>
	<title>Hell's Bells.</title>
	<author>Neanderthal Ninny</author>
	<datestamp>1245153960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best punishment for these people is have a thousand phones ringing all day, all night for a several years that they can't answer.<br>I have been suffering from these phone calls even though all my phones (including all my work phones) are on the "Do Not Call" list. Dying is too good for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best punishment for these people is have a thousand phones ringing all day , all night for a several years that they ca n't answer.I have been suffering from these phone calls even though all my phones ( including all my work phones ) are on the " Do Not Call " list .
Dying is too good for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best punishment for these people is have a thousand phones ringing all day, all night for a several years that they can't answer.I have been suffering from these phone calls even though all my phones (including all my work phones) are on the "Do Not Call" list.
Dying is too good for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344315</id>
	<title>These people should be killed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245087060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who needs a trial?  Let's kill them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs a trial ?
Let 's kill them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs a trial?
Let's kill them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346265</id>
	<title>Their Punishment Should Be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245158280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.PeopleAreRude.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.PeopleAreRude.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.PeopleAreRude.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344817</id>
	<title>For the record, I...</title>
	<author>dosh8er</author>
	<datestamp>1245093000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>answered the phone once after getting this call<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... yeah, guy said i had a 95... sucker... too bad i have a 94... he hung up on me promptly ("have a nice day." I think he said).

if we could find the person who's texting me by the name of "candy", i'd be a happy man...</htmltext>
<tokenext>answered the phone once after getting this call ... yeah , guy said i had a 95... sucker... too bad i have a 94... he hung up on me promptly ( " have a nice day .
" I think he said ) .
if we could find the person who 's texting me by the name of " candy " , i 'd be a happy man.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>answered the phone once after getting this call ... yeah, guy said i had a 95... sucker... too bad i have a 94... he hung up on me promptly ("have a nice day.
" I think he said).
if we could find the person who's texting me by the name of "candy", i'd be a happy man...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344485</id>
	<title>Re:The only robot call I got</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245089220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a <b>day</b> that was!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a day that was !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a day that was!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346205</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>rock\_climbing\_guy</author>
	<datestamp>1245157380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in my college dorm days, they used to call me at the dorms ( which had their own separate contiguous block of phone numbers ) to refinance my house.  No kidding!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in my college dorm days , they used to call me at the dorms ( which had their own separate contiguous block of phone numbers ) to refinance my house .
No kidding !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in my college dorm days, they used to call me at the dorms ( which had their own separate contiguous block of phone numbers ) to refinance my house.
No kidding!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345299</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>gTsiros</author>
	<datestamp>1245142800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be silly! You can replace the blinker fluids yourself and avoid all problems associated with it! Few people know about it so it won't be in the first results from google. Keep searching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be silly !
You can replace the blinker fluids yourself and avoid all problems associated with it !
Few people know about it so it wo n't be in the first results from google .
Keep searching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be silly!
You can replace the blinker fluids yourself and avoid all problems associated with it!
Few people know about it so it won't be in the first results from google.
Keep searching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347779</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245168300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, what we need to do is find out which number belongs to Chuck Schumer so we can put it down as an extra alternative contact number on job applications or when filling out forms on the web. Someone calling about whether you want a job or doing other business is likely to hit the first two numbers and be done. But when running into somebody who's just using that data only to sell it, all those numbers will get used. And those annoying robocalls are getting their numbers from somewhere (If you get hit by one, soon there will be many more.)</p><p>Since the FTC is doing a craptastic bureaucratic job of it, perhaps we should all start putting private numbers of political office holders or corporate bigwigs as number 3 or 4 in our alternate contact methods list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , what we need to do is find out which number belongs to Chuck Schumer so we can put it down as an extra alternative contact number on job applications or when filling out forms on the web .
Someone calling about whether you want a job or doing other business is likely to hit the first two numbers and be done .
But when running into somebody who 's just using that data only to sell it , all those numbers will get used .
And those annoying robocalls are getting their numbers from somewhere ( If you get hit by one , soon there will be many more .
) Since the FTC is doing a craptastic bureaucratic job of it , perhaps we should all start putting private numbers of political office holders or corporate bigwigs as number 3 or 4 in our alternate contact methods list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, what we need to do is find out which number belongs to Chuck Schumer so we can put it down as an extra alternative contact number on job applications or when filling out forms on the web.
Someone calling about whether you want a job or doing other business is likely to hit the first two numbers and be done.
But when running into somebody who's just using that data only to sell it, all those numbers will get used.
And those annoying robocalls are getting their numbers from somewhere (If you get hit by one, soon there will be many more.
)Since the FTC is doing a craptastic bureaucratic job of it, perhaps we should all start putting private numbers of political office holders or corporate bigwigs as number 3 or 4 in our alternate contact methods list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349085</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>atomicdoggy</author>
	<datestamp>1245173520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got hung up on after I told the lady I wasn't wearing any pants, and was rubbing peanut butter on my, umm, self... so that I can make a reeses peanut butter cup when I shove it in her hershey highway....</p><p>I thought that was rude... I was just getting started.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got hung up on after I told the lady I was n't wearing any pants , and was rubbing peanut butter on my , umm , self... so that I can make a reeses peanut butter cup when I shove it in her hershey highway....I thought that was rude... I was just getting started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got hung up on after I told the lady I wasn't wearing any pants, and was rubbing peanut butter on my, umm, self... so that I can make a reeses peanut butter cup when I shove it in her hershey highway....I thought that was rude... I was just getting started.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358743</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>lanner</author>
	<datestamp>1245272220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ultimately, this is a failure of the general public of the United States, not of government.  The people are foolish and afraid of government, yet there is no proverbial or literal blood of the do-nothing tax-milking government workers.  Those employed by the government will do whatever they can get away with, but it's the lack of participation by the general populous that allows them to continue doing nothing and get paid for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ultimately , this is a failure of the general public of the United States , not of government .
The people are foolish and afraid of government , yet there is no proverbial or literal blood of the do-nothing tax-milking government workers .
Those employed by the government will do whatever they can get away with , but it 's the lack of participation by the general populous that allows them to continue doing nothing and get paid for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ultimately, this is a failure of the general public of the United States, not of government.
The people are foolish and afraid of government, yet there is no proverbial or literal blood of the do-nothing tax-milking government workers.
Those employed by the government will do whatever they can get away with, but it's the lack of participation by the general populous that allows them to continue doing nothing and get paid for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343</id>
	<title>I love scammers..they're so much entertainment.</title>
	<author>Like2Byte</author>
	<datestamp>1245087480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this one company rep call me about how I had won 12 free magazine subscriptions for free - yes, that's right! FREE!. Made some 10 minute spiel about how wonderful it all was. All I needed to do was send $12.95 for some processing fee and I'd get my free, yes FREE! magazines.</p><p>I asked her, "If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?"</p><p>To her credit, she replied, "Because they're free!" (Can't blame a girl for trying.)</p><p>Soooo, I reiterated my question a few more times until she hung up on me.</p><p>It feels good when I frustrate scammers at their own game.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this one company rep call me about how I had won 12 free magazine subscriptions for free - yes , that 's right !
FREE ! . Made some 10 minute spiel about how wonderful it all was .
All I needed to do was send $ 12.95 for some processing fee and I 'd get my free , yes FREE !
magazines.I asked her , " If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $ 12.95 ?
" To her credit , she replied , " Because they 're free !
" ( Ca n't blame a girl for trying .
) Soooo , I reiterated my question a few more times until she hung up on me.It feels good when I frustrate scammers at their own game .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this one company rep call me about how I had won 12 free magazine subscriptions for free - yes, that's right!
FREE!. Made some 10 minute spiel about how wonderful it all was.
All I needed to do was send $12.95 for some processing fee and I'd get my free, yes FREE!
magazines.I asked her, "If I won and my subscriptions are free why do I have to pay $12.95?
"To her credit, she replied, "Because they're free!
" (Can't blame a girl for trying.
)Soooo, I reiterated my question a few more times until she hung up on me.It feels good when I frustrate scammers at their own game.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345461</id>
	<title>Re:I don't worry about warranties on my cars...</title>
	<author>Frogbert</author>
	<datestamp>1245145140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me guess, you're typing that on a Mac?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me guess , you 're typing that on a Mac ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me guess, you're typing that on a Mac?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28382935</id>
	<title>About damn time</title>
	<author>iq in binary</author>
	<datestamp>1245329400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At first I just harassed these guys. I had asked them not once, not twice, but 20+ time to remove me from their list. Their numbers changed constantly, and I often get called from out of state customers, thus I would have to answer the phone just to be sure it wasn't a customer.</p><p>When I figured out who it was and I had time, I would give them the impression that I was a wet dream of a sale. Several cars just out of warranty, BMW, Jeep, even a Range Rover; then I would tell them that I wanted to warranty all of them.......and that I'd be paying for it all right now with my credit card. I'd give them accurate VIN numbers (I've got several high-end cars parked up and down the street, and my neighbors would give me a beer for giving these guys hell), and spend at least 45 minutes on the phone with these guys just keeping them on the line with tales about how great these cars are. Then would come the credit card numbers.......which would all be canceled or expired cards that I kept around JUST for the occasion these guys called. This would of course be followed by at least ANOTHER 45 minutes of trying 1 number, ensuring it's correct, then trying another card, ensuring THAT number is correct, getting VISA customer service on the phone, etc.. After I hit the 90 minute mark:</p><p>Me: "How does it feel to have your time wasted?"<br>Salesman: "What do you mean, sir?"<br>Me: "How much trouble are you going to be in if you've been un-productive for the past hour and a half?"<br>Salesman: "Well, yeah I'd be in trouble, but we can make this work, don't worry."<br>Me: "You don't like being yelled at by the boss, do you?<br>Salesman: "No, I don't, but who does?"<br>Me: "*evil cackle* I'll tell you what, I LOVE it when guys like YOU get the proverbial boot to their ass."<br>Salesman: "I'm sorry, could you repeat that?"<br>Me: "You've just been punked, remove me from your list or I will keep getting reprobate fuckheads like you fired for wasting too much time."<br>*click*</p><p>I did that 6 times before I thought they got the impression. Except they didn't stop calling. I think they intentionally put me in every robocaller they had and set it to hang up every time I picked up. They're lucky the FCC got to them first, because last week I got called 54 times in the same day. Yes, that's right, 54 times. I called the number back after the 20th time and left them a message threatening legal action, and was interrupted by them calling me....again. I have long weekends and expendable income, if I found out where these guys were I was going to fly there and take a baseball bat to every piece of electronic equipment in sight, and Miguel if I found out who he was because I'm certain he's the one that put me on every machine. Come to think of it, these guys are lucky they didn't pull that stunt on a much more distemperate guy than me.....people could have been killed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At first I just harassed these guys .
I had asked them not once , not twice , but 20 + time to remove me from their list .
Their numbers changed constantly , and I often get called from out of state customers , thus I would have to answer the phone just to be sure it was n't a customer.When I figured out who it was and I had time , I would give them the impression that I was a wet dream of a sale .
Several cars just out of warranty , BMW , Jeep , even a Range Rover ; then I would tell them that I wanted to warranty all of them.......and that I 'd be paying for it all right now with my credit card .
I 'd give them accurate VIN numbers ( I 've got several high-end cars parked up and down the street , and my neighbors would give me a beer for giving these guys hell ) , and spend at least 45 minutes on the phone with these guys just keeping them on the line with tales about how great these cars are .
Then would come the credit card numbers.......which would all be canceled or expired cards that I kept around JUST for the occasion these guys called .
This would of course be followed by at least ANOTHER 45 minutes of trying 1 number , ensuring it 's correct , then trying another card , ensuring THAT number is correct , getting VISA customer service on the phone , etc.. After I hit the 90 minute mark : Me : " How does it feel to have your time wasted ?
" Salesman : " What do you mean , sir ?
" Me : " How much trouble are you going to be in if you 've been un-productive for the past hour and a half ?
" Salesman : " Well , yeah I 'd be in trouble , but we can make this work , do n't worry .
" Me : " You do n't like being yelled at by the boss , do you ? Salesman : " No , I do n't , but who does ?
" Me : " * evil cackle * I 'll tell you what , I LOVE it when guys like YOU get the proverbial boot to their ass .
" Salesman : " I 'm sorry , could you repeat that ?
" Me : " You 've just been punked , remove me from your list or I will keep getting reprobate fuckheads like you fired for wasting too much time .
" * click * I did that 6 times before I thought they got the impression .
Except they did n't stop calling .
I think they intentionally put me in every robocaller they had and set it to hang up every time I picked up .
They 're lucky the FCC got to them first , because last week I got called 54 times in the same day .
Yes , that 's right , 54 times .
I called the number back after the 20th time and left them a message threatening legal action , and was interrupted by them calling me....again .
I have long weekends and expendable income , if I found out where these guys were I was going to fly there and take a baseball bat to every piece of electronic equipment in sight , and Miguel if I found out who he was because I 'm certain he 's the one that put me on every machine .
Come to think of it , these guys are lucky they did n't pull that stunt on a much more distemperate guy than me.....people could have been killed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first I just harassed these guys.
I had asked them not once, not twice, but 20+ time to remove me from their list.
Their numbers changed constantly, and I often get called from out of state customers, thus I would have to answer the phone just to be sure it wasn't a customer.When I figured out who it was and I had time, I would give them the impression that I was a wet dream of a sale.
Several cars just out of warranty, BMW, Jeep, even a Range Rover; then I would tell them that I wanted to warranty all of them.......and that I'd be paying for it all right now with my credit card.
I'd give them accurate VIN numbers (I've got several high-end cars parked up and down the street, and my neighbors would give me a beer for giving these guys hell), and spend at least 45 minutes on the phone with these guys just keeping them on the line with tales about how great these cars are.
Then would come the credit card numbers.......which would all be canceled or expired cards that I kept around JUST for the occasion these guys called.
This would of course be followed by at least ANOTHER 45 minutes of trying 1 number, ensuring it's correct, then trying another card, ensuring THAT number is correct, getting VISA customer service on the phone, etc.. After I hit the 90 minute mark:Me: "How does it feel to have your time wasted?
"Salesman: "What do you mean, sir?
"Me: "How much trouble are you going to be in if you've been un-productive for the past hour and a half?
"Salesman: "Well, yeah I'd be in trouble, but we can make this work, don't worry.
"Me: "You don't like being yelled at by the boss, do you?Salesman: "No, I don't, but who does?
"Me: "*evil cackle* I'll tell you what, I LOVE it when guys like YOU get the proverbial boot to their ass.
"Salesman: "I'm sorry, could you repeat that?
"Me: "You've just been punked, remove me from your list or I will keep getting reprobate fuckheads like you fired for wasting too much time.
"*click*I did that 6 times before I thought they got the impression.
Except they didn't stop calling.
I think they intentionally put me in every robocaller they had and set it to hang up every time I picked up.
They're lucky the FCC got to them first, because last week I got called 54 times in the same day.
Yes, that's right, 54 times.
I called the number back after the 20th time and left them a message threatening legal action, and was interrupted by them calling me....again.
I have long weekends and expendable income, if I found out where these guys were I was going to fly there and take a baseball bat to every piece of electronic equipment in sight, and Miguel if I found out who he was because I'm certain he's the one that put me on every machine.
Come to think of it, these guys are lucky they didn't pull that stunt on a much more distemperate guy than me.....people could have been killed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344289</id>
	<title>Re:Knew it was a scam very quickly</title>
	<author>DreamsAreOkToo</author>
	<datestamp>1245086760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haha, that's pretty good.  I had a similar experience.  My car is 11 years old and has over 200k miles on it. (Honda Accord)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha , that 's pretty good .
I had a similar experience .
My car is 11 years old and has over 200k miles on it .
( Honda Accord )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha, that's pretty good.
I had a similar experience.
My car is 11 years old and has over 200k miles on it.
(Honda Accord)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347267</id>
	<title>Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa</title>
	<author>swb</author>
	<datestamp>1245165600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had dinner with a guy who had his company's merger (in an obscure concrete-related industry) with a larger entity get reviewed by the FTC and turned down (all during Bush Jr's second term).  He was understandably annoyed with the FTC, but his description of the FTC's operation was pretty stunning.  Apparently they're pretty autonomous and aren't really accountable at all.  He even had the backing of a household name Republican Senator with Bush connections and didn't get ANY traction.</p><p>My guess is that the FTC doesn't really give a shit about consumers and has their own agenda.  There's probably legitimate reason to provide them insulation from political pressure, but probably not reason enough to prevent accountability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had dinner with a guy who had his company 's merger ( in an obscure concrete-related industry ) with a larger entity get reviewed by the FTC and turned down ( all during Bush Jr 's second term ) .
He was understandably annoyed with the FTC , but his description of the FTC 's operation was pretty stunning .
Apparently they 're pretty autonomous and are n't really accountable at all .
He even had the backing of a household name Republican Senator with Bush connections and did n't get ANY traction.My guess is that the FTC does n't really give a shit about consumers and has their own agenda .
There 's probably legitimate reason to provide them insulation from political pressure , but probably not reason enough to prevent accountability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had dinner with a guy who had his company's merger (in an obscure concrete-related industry) with a larger entity get reviewed by the FTC and turned down (all during Bush Jr's second term).
He was understandably annoyed with the FTC, but his description of the FTC's operation was pretty stunning.
Apparently they're pretty autonomous and aren't really accountable at all.
He even had the backing of a household name Republican Senator with Bush connections and didn't get ANY traction.My guess is that the FTC doesn't really give a shit about consumers and has their own agenda.
There's probably legitimate reason to provide them insulation from political pressure, but probably not reason enough to prevent accountability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349285</id>
	<title>Re:My call...</title>
	<author>mcmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1245174180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...went something like this.</p><p>"I don't recognize that number on the caller ID"</p><p>If I don't know you, or your number is hidden to caller ID, I don't answer the phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...went something like this .
" I do n't recognize that number on the caller ID " If I do n't know you , or your number is hidden to caller ID , I do n't answer the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...went something like this.
"I don't recognize that number on the caller ID"If I don't know you, or your number is hidden to caller ID, I don't answer the phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28357091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349519
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28369027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344865
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28353819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28362797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347713
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_15_232211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344253
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344399
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28357091
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344831
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348965
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344267
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28362797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28369027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349085
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346777
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28351945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344577
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344895
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347399
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344979
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344481
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344627
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28349519
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358361
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28353819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28352805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344281
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344933
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28348275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28358743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344523
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28354323
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28350575
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346387
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347267
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28346537
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28347779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_15_232211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28345887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_15_232211.28344485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
