<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_12_1651244</id>
	<title>14-Year-Old Boy Smote By Meteorite</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244831940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"Winning the lottery requires incredible luck and one in a million odds.  So does getting hit by a falling space rock.  A 14-year-old German boy was granted <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/space/5511619/14-year-old-hit-by-30000-mph-space-meteorite.html">a three-inch scar by the gods</a>.  A pea-sized meteorite smote young Gerrit Blank's hand before leaving a foot-sized crater on the road.  The boy's account: 'At first I just saw a large ball of light, and then I suddenly felt a pain in my hand.  Then a split second after that there was an enormous bang like a crash of thunder.  The noise that came after the flash of light was so loud that my ears were ringing for hours afterwards.  When it hit me it knocked me flying and then was still going fast enough to bury itself into the road.'  Curiously, the rock was magnetic, and tests were done to verify it is extraterrestrial.  The Telegraph notes the only other recorded event of a meteorite striking a person was 'in November 1954 when a grapefruit-sized fragment crashed through the roof of a house, bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.'  Space.com lists <a href="http://www.space.com/news/090612-boy-hit-by-meteorite.html">a few more anomalies</a> and we <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/05/1419247&amp;tid=270">discussed the probability of these things downing aircraft</a> recently."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " Winning the lottery requires incredible luck and one in a million odds .
So does getting hit by a falling space rock .
A 14-year-old German boy was granted a three-inch scar by the gods .
A pea-sized meteorite smote young Gerrit Blank 's hand before leaving a foot-sized crater on the road .
The boy 's account : 'At first I just saw a large ball of light , and then I suddenly felt a pain in my hand .
Then a split second after that there was an enormous bang like a crash of thunder .
The noise that came after the flash of light was so loud that my ears were ringing for hours afterwards .
When it hit me it knocked me flying and then was still going fast enough to bury itself into the road .
' Curiously , the rock was magnetic , and tests were done to verify it is extraterrestrial .
The Telegraph notes the only other recorded event of a meteorite striking a person was 'in November 1954 when a grapefruit-sized fragment crashed through the roof of a house , bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman .
' Space.com lists a few more anomalies and we discussed the probability of these things downing aircraft recently .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "Winning the lottery requires incredible luck and one in a million odds.
So does getting hit by a falling space rock.
A 14-year-old German boy was granted a three-inch scar by the gods.
A pea-sized meteorite smote young Gerrit Blank's hand before leaving a foot-sized crater on the road.
The boy's account: 'At first I just saw a large ball of light, and then I suddenly felt a pain in my hand.
Then a split second after that there was an enormous bang like a crash of thunder.
The noise that came after the flash of light was so loud that my ears were ringing for hours afterwards.
When it hit me it knocked me flying and then was still going fast enough to bury itself into the road.
'  Curiously, the rock was magnetic, and tests were done to verify it is extraterrestrial.
The Telegraph notes the only other recorded event of a meteorite striking a person was 'in November 1954 when a grapefruit-sized fragment crashed through the roof of a house, bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.
'  Space.com lists a few more anomalies and we discussed the probability of these things downing aircraft recently.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</id>
	<title>Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy now automatically wins all bar scar-comparing competitions (when he's allowed to go in a bar, that is).</p><p>See this?  My cat attacked me, gashed my wrist all the way to the bone.</p><p>That's nothing.  Look here, rabid racoon, I had to be quarantined for days.</p><p>Child's play.  Look at this, shot myself with a nail gun, stumbled back and stepped on a rake.</p><p>Oh yeah?  Well God shot me with a meteorite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy now automatically wins all bar scar-comparing competitions ( when he 's allowed to go in a bar , that is ) .See this ?
My cat attacked me , gashed my wrist all the way to the bone.That 's nothing .
Look here , rabid racoon , I had to be quarantined for days.Child 's play .
Look at this , shot myself with a nail gun , stumbled back and stepped on a rake.Oh yeah ?
Well God shot me with a meteorite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy now automatically wins all bar scar-comparing competitions (when he's allowed to go in a bar, that is).See this?
My cat attacked me, gashed my wrist all the way to the bone.That's nothing.
Look here, rabid racoon, I had to be quarantined for days.Child's play.
Look at this, shot myself with a nail gun, stumbled back and stepped on a rake.Oh yeah?
Well God shot me with a meteorite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313735</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>B1oodAnge1</author>
	<datestamp>1244799300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I certainly missed the part of the article where they supported that claim...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I certainly missed the part of the article where they supported that claim.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I certainly missed the part of the article where they supported that claim...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315189</id>
	<title>imperialunits</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1244807040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>talking about that quote, when did germany start using imperial units ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>talking about that quote , when did germany start using imperial units ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>talking about that quote, when did germany start using imperial units ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313257</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently you missed the part of the article mentioning astronomers and scientists having actually tested the rock and verified that rock is from outer space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently you missed the part of the article mentioning astronomers and scientists having actually tested the rock and verified that rock is from outer space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently you missed the part of the article mentioning astronomers and scientists having actually tested the rock and verified that rock is from outer space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311819</id>
	<title>What's this picture for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not a picture of his hand?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not a picture of his hand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not a picture of his hand?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313529</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>WebmasterNeal</author>
	<datestamp>1244798520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds a bit like that Seinfeld episode where Krammer gets spit on and it miraculously turns around in mid air hitting Newmen as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds a bit like that Seinfeld episode where Krammer gets spit on and it miraculously turns around in mid air hitting Newmen as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds a bit like that Seinfeld episode where Krammer gets spit on and it miraculously turns around in mid air hitting Newmen as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322307</id>
	<title>Evel Kneivel once said;</title>
	<author>Flash13</author>
	<datestamp>1244886540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bones heal, chicks dig scars, pain is temporary, glory is forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bones heal , chicks dig scars , pain is temporary , glory is forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bones heal, chicks dig scars, pain is temporary, glory is forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311825</id>
	<title>ouch</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1244835720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wouldn't want one of those going up you know where while snoozing at the beach. no siree.</htmltext>
<tokenext>would n't want one of those going up you know where while snoozing at the beach .
no siree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wouldn't want one of those going up you know where while snoozing at the beach.
no siree.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314249</id>
	<title>Who gets it?</title>
	<author>guspasho</author>
	<datestamp>1244801820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope the kid gets to keep the meteorite. I mean, if it struck him before it hit the earth, how can it not be his property?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope the kid gets to keep the meteorite .
I mean , if it struck him before it hit the earth , how can it not be his property ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope the kid gets to keep the meteorite.
I mean, if it struck him before it hit the earth, how can it not be his property?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312049</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Petrini</author>
	<datestamp>1244836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I interpreted that sentence to mean there is only one chance in a million of surviving being hit by a meteorite, not that the chance of being hit at all was so small.  I would guess the odds of being struck at any second are far less than one in a million, or we'd be splattered all over the place.  Similarly, it seems like the odds of surviving are much higher than one in a million, unless, in addition to our two survivors, there are 1,999,998 smoten people we haven't heard much about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I interpreted that sentence to mean there is only one chance in a million of surviving being hit by a meteorite , not that the chance of being hit at all was so small .
I would guess the odds of being struck at any second are far less than one in a million , or we 'd be splattered all over the place .
Similarly , it seems like the odds of surviving are much higher than one in a million , unless , in addition to our two survivors , there are 1,999,998 smoten people we have n't heard much about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I interpreted that sentence to mean there is only one chance in a million of surviving being hit by a meteorite, not that the chance of being hit at all was so small.
I would guess the odds of being struck at any second are far less than one in a million, or we'd be splattered all over the place.
Similarly, it seems like the odds of surviving are much higher than one in a million, unless, in addition to our two survivors, there are 1,999,998 smoten people we haven't heard much about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313007</id>
	<title>Re:Points for creativity</title>
	<author>Tuidjy</author>
	<datestamp>1244839800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the high probability that their entered Earth's<br>atmosphere at a different angle and/or speed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the high probability that their entered Earth'satmosphere at a different angle and/or speed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the high probability that their entered Earth'satmosphere at a different angle and/or speed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929</id>
	<title>What is more...</title>
	<author>a whoabot</author>
	<datestamp>1244836140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German.  I didn't think these things existed anymore;  I thought all Germans were over 40 by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German .
I did n't think these things existed anymore ; I thought all Germans were over 40 by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German.
I didn't think these things existed anymore;  I thought all Germans were over 40 by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313173</id>
	<title>So he must be...</title>
	<author>Tailsfan</author>
	<datestamp>1244797200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So he must be the second person recorded to be struck with such an object.  I better watch mah head.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So he must be the second person recorded to be struck with such an object .
I better watch mah head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So he must be the second person recorded to be struck with such an object.
I better watch mah head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312645</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1244838600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5\_myths\_020903-5.html" title="space.com">http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5\_myths\_020903-5.html</a> [space.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5 \ _myths \ _020903-5.html [ space.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5\_myths\_020903-5.html [space.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312747</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ablation brings heat away from the meteorite.  Some heat shields and rocket nozzles exhaust heat with the same process.</p><p>That's why it's the size of a pea when it "hits" a little German boy, which I'm honestly not convinced of for the same reasons other people here aren't.  If it buries itself in a road, it doesn't bounce off skin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ablation brings heat away from the meteorite .
Some heat shields and rocket nozzles exhaust heat with the same process.That 's why it 's the size of a pea when it " hits " a little German boy , which I 'm honestly not convinced of for the same reasons other people here are n't .
If it buries itself in a road , it does n't bounce off skin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ablation brings heat away from the meteorite.
Some heat shields and rocket nozzles exhaust heat with the same process.That's why it's the size of a pea when it "hits" a little German boy, which I'm honestly not convinced of for the same reasons other people here aren't.
If it buries itself in a road, it doesn't bounce off skin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28320811</id>
	<title>No more luck?</title>
	<author>awarrenfells</author>
	<datestamp>1244916600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess this kid has no hope of winning the lottery any time soon.  I think we are only allowed a single "one in a million card" per person.  ^\_^</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess this kid has no hope of winning the lottery any time soon .
I think we are only allowed a single " one in a million card " per person .
^ \ _ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess this kid has no hope of winning the lottery any time soon.
I think we are only allowed a single "one in a million card" per person.
^\_^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</id>
	<title>ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1244836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: "A red hot, pea-sized piece of rock then hit his hand before bouncing off and causing a foot wide crater in the ground."
<br> <br>
First, meteors aren't hot.  Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand.  It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.  Was the kid's hand blown off?  No?  Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.  How about some photographs?  Oh, there are none?  Hmmm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " A red hot , pea-sized piece of rock then hit his hand before bouncing off and causing a foot wide crater in the ground .
" First , meteors are n't hot .
Second , if a " pea-sized piece of rock " is going fast enough to make " a foot wide crater in the ground , " it 's not going to be " bouncing off " shit , least of all this kid 's hand .
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug .
Was the kid 's hand blown off ?
No ? Then it did n't leave a fucking crater in the ground either .
How about some photographs ?
Oh , there are none ?
Hmmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: "A red hot, pea-sized piece of rock then hit his hand before bouncing off and causing a foot wide crater in the ground.
"
 
First, meteors aren't hot.
Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand.
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.
Was the kid's hand blown off?
No?  Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.
How about some photographs?
Oh, there are none?
Hmmm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313933</id>
	<title>Re:Queue the jokes</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1244800140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Queue the jokes... About self-gratification. This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. after all.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div><p>Why, do you think there will be enough of them that we need to form a orderly line for them?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue the jokes... About self-gratification .
This is / .
after all .
; ) Why , do you think there will be enough of them that we need to form a orderly line for them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue the jokes... About self-gratification.
This is /.
after all.
;)Why, do you think there will be enough of them that we need to form a orderly line for them?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315147</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1244806800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He said "since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?" - i.e., the population matters, because he's also using the information we have about the number of people who have been hit. But yes, yours would be another way of working it out (though you'd have to account for the amount of time spent outdoors).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He said " since there 's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences ?
" - i.e. , the population matters , because he 's also using the information we have about the number of people who have been hit .
But yes , yours would be another way of working it out ( though you 'd have to account for the amount of time spent outdoors ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He said "since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?
" - i.e., the population matters, because he's also using the information we have about the number of people who have been hit.
But yes, yours would be another way of working it out (though you'd have to account for the amount of time spent outdoors).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314663</id>
	<title>Re:More likely shrapnel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244803800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's called ejaculate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's called ejaculate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's called ejaculate</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312609</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244838420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1 out of a million chances happen 9 out of 10 times.<br>- Terry Pratchett.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 out of a million chances happen 9 out of 10 times.- Terry Pratchett .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 out of a million chances happen 9 out of 10 times.- Terry Pratchett.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313717</id>
	<title>Re:Red flags</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1244799240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you just claim that no meteors travel faster than bullets? What, is there some astrological traffic cop out in space regulating their speeds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you just claim that no meteors travel faster than bullets ?
What , is there some astrological traffic cop out in space regulating their speeds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you just claim that no meteors travel faster than bullets?
What, is there some astrological traffic cop out in space regulating their speeds?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312765</id>
	<title>if you look closely at the picture</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1244839020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it seems the meteorite has made him grow to 4-5 times the size of cars next to him</p><p>i saw this in a 1950s science documentary involving a woman who grew 50 feet tall and deranged from this sort of tragic accident</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it seems the meteorite has made him grow to 4-5 times the size of cars next to himi saw this in a 1950s science documentary involving a woman who grew 50 feet tall and deranged from this sort of tragic accident</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it seems the meteorite has made him grow to 4-5 times the size of cars next to himi saw this in a 1950s science documentary involving a woman who grew 50 feet tall and deranged from this sort of tragic accident</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316623</id>
	<title>looks like...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244819040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he looks like a girl...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he looks like a girl.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he looks like a girl...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312661</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>First, meteors aren't hot.</p></div></blockquote><p>wtf? and this gets modded up to 5?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , meteors are n't hot.wtf ?
and this gets modded up to 5 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, meteors aren't hot.wtf?
and this gets modded up to 5?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311853</id>
	<title>God is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God is back... and he's <i>pissed</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God is back... and he 's pissed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God is back... and he's pissed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313871</id>
	<title>Re:"Smitten", not "smote"</title>
	<author>mkettler</author>
	<datestamp>1244799900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, the average American believes the only use for the word "smitten" is as a synonym for lovestruck, and you expect<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. to get the grammar right?</p><p>Good luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , the average American believes the only use for the word " smitten " is as a synonym for lovestruck , and you expect / .
to get the grammar right ? Good luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, the average American believes the only use for the word "smitten" is as a synonym for lovestruck, and you expect /.
to get the grammar right?Good luck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312809</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244839200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well that heat would be applied quickly and only really heat up the outer most layer. That layer being the one extremely windswept carrying away heat.  The hot part is the part that is falling off. Don't forget the entire center of it is damn near absolute zero from floating in space. I bet it only feels warm for a moment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that heat would be applied quickly and only really heat up the outer most layer .
That layer being the one extremely windswept carrying away heat .
The hot part is the part that is falling off .
Do n't forget the entire center of it is damn near absolute zero from floating in space .
I bet it only feels warm for a moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that heat would be applied quickly and only really heat up the outer most layer.
That layer being the one extremely windswept carrying away heat.
The hot part is the part that is falling off.
Don't forget the entire center of it is damn near absolute zero from floating in space.
I bet it only feels warm for a moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314057</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>jbsouthe</author>
	<datestamp>1244800800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million?  Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?</p></div><p>well the only other time it happened, in recorded history was 1954, how many people were on the planet then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million ?
Is n't it closer to one in a few billion , since there 's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences ? well the only other time it happened , in recorded history was 1954 , how many people were on the planet then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million?
Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?well the only other time it happened, in recorded history was 1954, how many people were on the planet then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315937</id>
	<title>Re:More likely shrapnel</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244812680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people get the order of event sin the situations wrong.<br>Seriously, most the stuff you remember is wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people get the order of event sin the situations wrong.Seriously , most the stuff you remember is wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people get the order of event sin the situations wrong.Seriously, most the stuff you remember is wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322093</id>
	<title>Re:six out of every seven of them land in water</title>
	<author>Archimboldo</author>
	<datestamp>1244884380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has been 25 years since working with anything astronomical, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>I googled for the Leonid meteor shower and found that most of the objects in that shower enter from around RA=153 , DECL=+22.</p><p>Coming from the north (22 degrees), a meteor has a greater chance of hitting land as most of the land masses are in the northern hemisphere.</p><p>Orionids also enter from higher DECs.  I'm too lazy to check other meteor showers, but there's an hypothesis for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has been 25 years since working with anything astronomical , but ...I googled for the Leonid meteor shower and found that most of the objects in that shower enter from around RA = 153 , DECL = + 22.Coming from the north ( 22 degrees ) , a meteor has a greater chance of hitting land as most of the land masses are in the northern hemisphere.Orionids also enter from higher DECs .
I 'm too lazy to check other meteor showers , but there 's an hypothesis for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has been 25 years since working with anything astronomical, but ...I googled for the Leonid meteor shower and found that most of the objects in that shower enter from around RA=153 , DECL=+22.Coming from the north (22 degrees), a meteor has a greater chance of hitting land as most of the land masses are in the northern hemisphere.Orionids also enter from higher DECs.
I'm too lazy to check other meteor showers, but there's an hypothesis for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311907</id>
	<title>Queue the jokes</title>
	<author>plopez</author>
	<datestamp>1244836020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About self-gratification. This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. after all.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About self-gratification .
This is / .
after all .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About self-gratification.
This is /.
after all.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312573</id>
	<title>Because every event gets reported?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't count with population of 6 billion. About 1.3 of that live in India. Have you ever been to the country's poor areas (=which is nearly all of it). I've only traveled once through the country and most of that time in a train but I feel confident to say that if someone gets hit by a small meteor there, it won't get reported and confirmed.</p><p>Same is true for chine which also has over a billion people. And the poor parts of Africa... And I would guess that the same stands even for a lot of South America and Mexico...</p><p>Hell, the amount of people among which such events would likely be reported is probably closer to a billion. And even among them, only those identified as meteor strikes. I wouldn't be surprised if a few would just go "Where the hell did that come from?! WHICH ONE OF YOU FUCKERS THREW A ROCK AT ME?!"</p><p>Yeah, one in a million sounds still way of but 2 reported incidents in six billion is far, far away from two incidents in six billion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't count with population of 6 billion .
About 1.3 of that live in India .
Have you ever been to the country 's poor areas ( = which is nearly all of it ) .
I 've only traveled once through the country and most of that time in a train but I feel confident to say that if someone gets hit by a small meteor there , it wo n't get reported and confirmed.Same is true for chine which also has over a billion people .
And the poor parts of Africa... And I would guess that the same stands even for a lot of South America and Mexico...Hell , the amount of people among which such events would likely be reported is probably closer to a billion .
And even among them , only those identified as meteor strikes .
I would n't be surprised if a few would just go " Where the hell did that come from ? !
WHICH ONE OF YOU FUCKERS THREW A ROCK AT ME ? !
" Yeah , one in a million sounds still way of but 2 reported incidents in six billion is far , far away from two incidents in six billion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't count with population of 6 billion.
About 1.3 of that live in India.
Have you ever been to the country's poor areas (=which is nearly all of it).
I've only traveled once through the country and most of that time in a train but I feel confident to say that if someone gets hit by a small meteor there, it won't get reported and confirmed.Same is true for chine which also has over a billion people.
And the poor parts of Africa... And I would guess that the same stands even for a lot of South America and Mexico...Hell, the amount of people among which such events would likely be reported is probably closer to a billion.
And even among them, only those identified as meteor strikes.
I wouldn't be surprised if a few would just go "Where the hell did that come from?!
WHICH ONE OF YOU FUCKERS THREW A ROCK AT ME?!
"Yeah, one in a million sounds still way of but 2 reported incidents in six billion is far, far away from two incidents in six billion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311987</id>
	<title>Count me a skeptic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No photos of any wound, but fast enough to bury in the ground or leave a foot long mark on the ground?  Loud noise?  Many small meteors are traveling quite slowly by time they reach the surface.  Small meteorites are quite easy to obtain.  Apparently <a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Boy-Hit-On-Arm-By-White-Hot-Meteorite-From-Outer-Space-Travelling-At-30000mph/Article/200906215302251?lpos=World\_News\_First\_Strange\_News\_\_Article\_Teaser\_Region\_\_0&amp;lid=ARTICLE\_15302251\_Boy\_Hit\_On\_Arm\_By\_White-Hot" title="sky.com">this</a> [sky.com] is a photo of the rock.  Is that the 3-inch scar?  Just dunno...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No photos of any wound , but fast enough to bury in the ground or leave a foot long mark on the ground ?
Loud noise ?
Many small meteors are traveling quite slowly by time they reach the surface .
Small meteorites are quite easy to obtain .
Apparently this [ sky.com ] is a photo of the rock .
Is that the 3-inch scar ?
Just dunno.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No photos of any wound, but fast enough to bury in the ground or leave a foot long mark on the ground?
Loud noise?
Many small meteors are traveling quite slowly by time they reach the surface.
Small meteorites are quite easy to obtain.
Apparently this [sky.com] is a photo of the rock.
Is that the 3-inch scar?
Just dunno...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313745</id>
	<title>Re:Watch out chilluns</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1244799300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only children are hit because only children are outside. Adults spend their days in fabric-covered boxes staring at computer monitors, with roofing protecting them from strikes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only children are hit because only children are outside .
Adults spend their days in fabric-covered boxes staring at computer monitors , with roofing protecting them from strikes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only children are hit because only children are outside.
Adults spend their days in fabric-covered boxes staring at computer monitors, with roofing protecting them from strikes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314975</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244805840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In regards to the 'not hot' comment... perhaps the air around it was higher temperature.  I'm not a scientist, so I have no clue if that'd be the case or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In regards to the 'not hot ' comment... perhaps the air around it was higher temperature .
I 'm not a scientist , so I have no clue if that 'd be the case or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In regards to the 'not hot' comment... perhaps the air around it was higher temperature.
I'm not a scientist, so I have no clue if that'd be the case or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318027</id>
	<title>"Wired" article on the subject</title>
	<author>clarkie.mg</author>
	<datestamp>1244924580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting article on "Wired" on the subject : <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/boy-survives-being-struck-by-a-meteorite/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/boy-survives-being-struck-by-a-meteorite/</a> [wired.com]<br>with a photo of a car hit and these numbers :</p><p>"A broad 1991 study of meteorite strikes on structures and near humans found that they are relatively common. The authors tabulated 69 strikes on human infrastructure since 1790, including 57 in the 20th century. They also counted 25 near misses of human beings."</p><p>Will this case be classified as a near miss or direct hit ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting article on " Wired " on the subject : http : //www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/boy-survives-being-struck-by-a-meteorite/ [ wired.com ] with a photo of a car hit and these numbers : " A broad 1991 study of meteorite strikes on structures and near humans found that they are relatively common .
The authors tabulated 69 strikes on human infrastructure since 1790 , including 57 in the 20th century .
They also counted 25 near misses of human beings .
" Will this case be classified as a near miss or direct hit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting article on "Wired" on the subject : http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/boy-survives-being-struck-by-a-meteorite/ [wired.com]with a photo of a car hit and these numbers :"A broad 1991 study of meteorite strikes on structures and near humans found that they are relatively common.
The authors tabulated 69 strikes on human infrastructure since 1790, including 57 in the 20th century.
They also counted 25 near misses of human beings.
"Will this case be classified as a near miss or direct hit ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315229</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>TBoon</author>
	<datestamp>1244807340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And in china, if you're one in a million, there is a thousand people just like yo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And in china , if you 're one in a million , there is a thousand people just like yo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in china, if you're one in a million, there is a thousand people just like yo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312961</id>
	<title>Re:echte grammar nazi</title>
	<author>ArieKremen</author>
	<datestamp>1244839620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sentences start with capital letters.  Proper nouns should be capitalized in English as well.<br><br>Sechs, setzen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sentences start with capital letters .
Proper nouns should be capitalized in English as well.Sechs , setzen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sentences start with capital letters.
Proper nouns should be capitalized in English as well.Sechs, setzen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913</id>
	<title>yikes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid, maybe we should take the hint and finish him off</htmltext>
<tokenext>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid , maybe we should take the hint and finish him off</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid, maybe we should take the hint and finish him off</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312209</id>
	<title>Re:yikes</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1244837100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Similar Final Destination moment:</p><p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/06/12/air-france-ganthaler598.html" title="www.cbc.ca">Woman who missed the downed Air France flight dies in a car crash</a> [www.cbc.ca]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar Final Destination moment : Woman who missed the downed Air France flight dies in a car crash [ www.cbc.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar Final Destination moment:Woman who missed the downed Air France flight dies in a car crash [www.cbc.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313001</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>juanergie</author>
	<datestamp>1244839740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how many people consider asteroids a real threat to humankind? Granted, two human occurrences of extraterrestrial pebbles are not cause for concern but, what about when the pebble turns out to be a 200m rock?</p><p>It won't be Aphophis, most likely, but it will happen one day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how many people consider asteroids a real threat to humankind ?
Granted , two human occurrences of extraterrestrial pebbles are not cause for concern but , what about when the pebble turns out to be a 200m rock ? It wo n't be Aphophis , most likely , but it will happen one day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how many people consider asteroids a real threat to humankind?
Granted, two human occurrences of extraterrestrial pebbles are not cause for concern but, what about when the pebble turns out to be a 200m rock?It won't be Aphophis, most likely, but it will happen one day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am not a statistician, but isn't it a little more difficult than simply counting the current population size and dividing that by the total number of occurrences?  I mean, shouldn't we also factor in everyone who lived between 1954 and now (for the sake of argument, lets say time began with the first strike), and also somehow factor in time since many of those people may be dead today and thus should not count as being hit by a space object?<br>
<br>
Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not a statistician , but is n't it a little more difficult than simply counting the current population size and dividing that by the total number of occurrences ?
I mean , should n't we also factor in everyone who lived between 1954 and now ( for the sake of argument , lets say time began with the first strike ) , and also somehow factor in time since many of those people may be dead today and thus should not count as being hit by a space object ?
Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not a statistician, but isn't it a little more difficult than simply counting the current population size and dividing that by the total number of occurrences?
I mean, shouldn't we also factor in everyone who lived between 1954 and now (for the sake of argument, lets say time began with the first strike), and also somehow factor in time since many of those people may be dead today and thus should not count as being hit by a space object?
Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313163</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1244797200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes it would have gone straight through without causing that much damage, but the story says it bounced off, not passed through.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it would have gone straight through without causing that much damage , but the story says it bounced off , not passed through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it would have gone straight through without causing that much damage, but the story says it bounced off, not passed through.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316169</id>
	<title>Smite me!  oh mighty smiter!</title>
	<author>NoBozo99</author>
	<datestamp>1244814660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure the kids name isn't Bruce?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure the kids name is n't Bruce ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure the kids name isn't Bruce?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313025</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244839860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thoughts exactly.  Something's fishy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly .
Something 's fishy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.
Something's fishy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313559</id>
	<title>Re:Points for creativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's something about this boy's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that doesn't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.</p></div><p>I understand you have information about the speed of both meteorites?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's something about this boy 's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that does n't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.I understand you have information about the speed of both meteorites ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's something about this boy's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that doesn't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.I understand you have information about the speed of both meteorites?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316071</id>
	<title>This is a message to the sinner.</title>
	<author>thermal\_7</author>
	<datestamp>1244813880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That will teach him to masturbate.

<br>
<br>
*slowly closes porn windows*</htmltext>
<tokenext>That will teach him to masturbate .
* slowly closes porn windows *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That will teach him to masturbate.
*slowly closes porn windows*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28370933</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245317100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Luxury!  When I was young, God couldn't be bothered to shoot us with pea-sized meteorites.  We had to take turns throwing one pea-sized-meteorite-sized pea at each other!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Luxury !
When I was young , God could n't be bothered to shoot us with pea-sized meteorites .
We had to take turns throwing one pea-sized-meteorite-sized pea at each other !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luxury!
When I was young, God couldn't be bothered to shoot us with pea-sized meteorites.
We had to take turns throwing one pea-sized-meteorite-sized pea at each other!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313441</id>
	<title>Re:Well, sucks to be him</title>
	<author>geekgirlandrea</author>
	<datestamp>1244798220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, the meteor strike is evidence that this kid is a reverse <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teela\_Brown" title="wikipedia.org">Teela Brown</a> [wikipedia.org], so he can look forward to a lifetime of car accidents, lightning strikes, zombie infestations and the occasional glyptodont attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the meteor strike is evidence that this kid is a reverse Teela Brown [ wikipedia.org ] , so he can look forward to a lifetime of car accidents , lightning strikes , zombie infestations and the occasional glyptodont attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the meteor strike is evidence that this kid is a reverse Teela Brown [wikipedia.org], so he can look forward to a lifetime of car accidents, lightning strikes, zombie infestations and the occasional glyptodont attack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281</id>
	<title>Watch out chilluns</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1244837340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Curiously, a British girl was <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2218755.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">hit in the foot</a> [bbc.co.uk] by a meteorite a few years ago. Is this tit for tat in a new grudge war between the two rivals?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Curiously , a British girl was hit in the foot [ bbc.co.uk ] by a meteorite a few years ago .
Is this tit for tat in a new grudge war between the two rivals ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Curiously, a British girl was hit in the foot [bbc.co.uk] by a meteorite a few years ago.
Is this tit for tat in a new grudge war between the two rivals?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314279</id>
	<title>Re:Watch out chilluns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244801940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"tit for tat?"</p><p>I thought you said she was hit in the foot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" tit for tat ?
" I thought you said she was hit in the foot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"tit for tat?
"I thought you said she was hit in the foot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312555</id>
	<title>Re:More likely shrapnel</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1244838240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how exactly do you presume that debris managed to strike him before the meteor reached the ground?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how exactly do you presume that debris managed to strike him before the meteor reached the ground ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how exactly do you presume that debris managed to strike him before the meteor reached the ground?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311969</id>
	<title>Re:yikes</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1244836260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid, maybe we should take the hint and finish him off</p></div><p>He survived geting hit ny a meteor. <br>
He's too powerful for us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid , maybe we should take the hint and finish him offHe survived geting hit ny a meteor .
He 's too powerful for us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the gods or whatever clearly hate this kid, maybe we should take the hint and finish him offHe survived geting hit ny a meteor.
He's too powerful for us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319047</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244899080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He is 14 and he lives in Germany.  He could go to a bar today if he wanted to.  I went to bars pretty regularly when I was 13, although I was 15 before I started drinking alcoholic beverages while there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is 14 and he lives in Germany .
He could go to a bar today if he wanted to .
I went to bars pretty regularly when I was 13 , although I was 15 before I started drinking alcoholic beverages while there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is 14 and he lives in Germany.
He could go to a bar today if he wanted to.
I went to bars pretty regularly when I was 13, although I was 15 before I started drinking alcoholic beverages while there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315903</id>
	<title>Re:BWAHAHAHAHA BULLSHIT</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1244812380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've seen peas the size of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 caliber rounds...And I doubt 30,000MPH. Maybe 250 at best.</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory\_gunfire#Falling-bullet\_injuries" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory\_gunfire#Falling-bullet\_injuries</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Firearms expert Julian Hatcher studied falling bullets and found that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.30 caliber rounds reach velocities of 300 feet per second (90 m/s) and larger<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 caliber bullets have a velocity of 500 feet per second (150 m/s)</p></div><p>500 f/s ~ 340 m/h</p><p>You may resume "bwahaha"ing now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen peas the size of .50 caliber rounds...And I doubt 30,000MPH .
Maybe 250 at best .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory \ _gunfire # Falling-bullet \ _injuries [ wikipedia.org ] Firearms expert Julian Hatcher studied falling bullets and found that .30 caliber rounds reach velocities of 300 feet per second ( 90 m/s ) and larger .50 caliber bullets have a velocity of 500 feet per second ( 150 m/s ) 500 f/s ~ 340 m/hYou may resume " bwahaha " ing now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen peas the size of .50 caliber rounds...And I doubt 30,000MPH.
Maybe 250 at best.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory\_gunfire#Falling-bullet\_injuries [wikipedia.org] Firearms expert Julian Hatcher studied falling bullets and found that .30 caliber rounds reach velocities of 300 feet per second (90 m/s) and larger .50 caliber bullets have a velocity of 500 feet per second (150 m/s)500 f/s ~ 340 m/hYou may resume "bwahaha"ing now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312933</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>Goffee71</author>
	<datestamp>1244839560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>He gets his own movie, Gerite Point Blank</htmltext>
<tokenext>He gets his own movie , Gerite Point Blank</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He gets his own movie, Gerite Point Blank</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312167</id>
	<title>..hit by 30,000 mph.. really?</title>
	<author>Seth Kriticos</author>
	<datestamp>1244836920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article states that "14-year-old hit by 30,000 mph space meteorite", which sounds like he would have been hit by it with this velocity. Now if he would have been, then he and his near surrounding would be dust. It's true, that meteorites get this speeds when they enter atmosphere, but in the final phase before impact they are slowed down to only a few mph because of the air resistance.<br><br>Only really huge fucking cataclysmic asteroids reach ground with devastating speeds (the much bigger ones that create lake size craters).<br><br>Also the chance to get hit by an asteroid are astronomically small for an individual, true, but what do you expect when 8 billion people are jumping around all day? Of course it hits someone sometimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article states that " 14-year-old hit by 30,000 mph space meteorite " , which sounds like he would have been hit by it with this velocity .
Now if he would have been , then he and his near surrounding would be dust .
It 's true , that meteorites get this speeds when they enter atmosphere , but in the final phase before impact they are slowed down to only a few mph because of the air resistance.Only really huge fucking cataclysmic asteroids reach ground with devastating speeds ( the much bigger ones that create lake size craters ) .Also the chance to get hit by an asteroid are astronomically small for an individual , true , but what do you expect when 8 billion people are jumping around all day ?
Of course it hits someone sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article states that "14-year-old hit by 30,000 mph space meteorite", which sounds like he would have been hit by it with this velocity.
Now if he would have been, then he and his near surrounding would be dust.
It's true, that meteorites get this speeds when they enter atmosphere, but in the final phase before impact they are slowed down to only a few mph because of the air resistance.Only really huge fucking cataclysmic asteroids reach ground with devastating speeds (the much bigger ones that create lake size craters).Also the chance to get hit by an asteroid are astronomically small for an individual, true, but what do you expect when 8 billion people are jumping around all day?
Of course it hits someone sometimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312291</id>
	<title>I want to know...</title>
	<author>PortHaven</author>
	<datestamp>1244837400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What kind of super-powers he developed afterwards.</p><p>***</p><p>My guess, he did not get hit by the meteorite that made the 1ft crater. Rather, he probably got hit by a small granual fragment that had broken off of the meteorite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of super-powers he developed afterwards .
* * * My guess , he did not get hit by the meteorite that made the 1ft crater .
Rather , he probably got hit by a small granual fragment that had broken off of the meteorite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of super-powers he developed afterwards.
***My guess, he did not get hit by the meteorite that made the 1ft crater.
Rather, he probably got hit by a small granual fragment that had broken off of the meteorite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311851</id>
	<title>movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does that mean this kid will become stinking rich with movie royalties?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does that mean this kid will become stinking rich with movie royalties ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does that mean this kid will become stinking rich with movie royalties?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315067</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>broggyr</author>
	<datestamp>1244806380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Build a bridge out of 'im!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Build a bridge out of 'im !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Build a bridge out of 'im!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314799</id>
	<title>Occam's Razor</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244804400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The probability of somebody lying about a meteor strike is much, much higher than the probability of somebody actually being struck by a meteor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The probability of somebody lying about a meteor strike is much , much higher than the probability of somebody actually being struck by a meteor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The probability of somebody lying about a meteor strike is much, much higher than the probability of somebody actually being struck by a meteor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313633</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1244798940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have to take into account the occasional earth-killer meteor. It skews the stats quite a bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to take into account the occasional earth-killer meteor .
It skews the stats quite a bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to take into account the occasional earth-killer meteor.
It skews the stats quite a bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318743</id>
	<title>Re:What is more...</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1244894160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German.  I didn't think these things existed anymore;  I thought all Germans were over 40 by now.</p></div><p>Maybe he is a 41-year-old dyslexic German.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German .
I did n't think these things existed anymore ; I thought all Germans were over 40 by now.Maybe he is a 41-year-old dyslexic German .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is more amazing is that it struck a 14-year-old German.
I didn't think these things existed anymore;  I thought all Germans were over 40 by now.Maybe he is a 41-year-old dyslexic German.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313041</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Nikker</author>
	<datestamp>1244839920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like these 'News Jockeys' are still stuck in this mentality from the early 1900's where a million of anything was a fascinating concept.  This 'stat' seems to infer that with each asteroid that makes it past the atmosphere there is a 1 in 1 mil chance of it hitting a person.  That would mean that each asteroid would definitely hit someone somewhere, and that just isn't happening.  So I guess we chalk it up to "lies, dammed lies, and statistics".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like these 'News Jockeys ' are still stuck in this mentality from the early 1900 's where a million of anything was a fascinating concept .
This 'stat ' seems to infer that with each asteroid that makes it past the atmosphere there is a 1 in 1 mil chance of it hitting a person .
That would mean that each asteroid would definitely hit someone somewhere , and that just is n't happening .
So I guess we chalk it up to " lies , dammed lies , and statistics " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like these 'News Jockeys' are still stuck in this mentality from the early 1900's where a million of anything was a fascinating concept.
This 'stat' seems to infer that with each asteroid that makes it past the atmosphere there is a 1 in 1 mil chance of it hitting a person.
That would mean that each asteroid would definitely hit someone somewhere, and that just isn't happening.
So I guess we chalk it up to "lies, dammed lies, and statistics".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313121</id>
	<title>Are you sure that's a boy???</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1244840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geez.  Get hair cut you sissy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez .
Get hair cut you sissy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez.
Get hair cut you sissy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312429</id>
	<title>Back in my days</title>
	<author>jsveiga</author>
	<datestamp>1244837880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...the dog ate my homework was good enough!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the dog ate my homework was good enough !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the dog ate my homework was good enough!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316735</id>
	<title>Re:Count me a skeptic</title>
	<author>Daemonax</author>
	<datestamp>1244820000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/picturesoftheday/5513461/Pictures-of-the-day-12-June-2009.html" title="telegraph.co.uk">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/picturesoftheday/5513461/Pictures-of-the-day-12-June-2009.html</a> [telegraph.co.uk]
<br>
There you go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/picturesoftheday/5513461/Pictures-of-the-day-12-June-2009.html [ telegraph.co.uk ] There you go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/picturesoftheday/5513461/Pictures-of-the-day-12-June-2009.html [telegraph.co.uk]

There you go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314043</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244800740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shame on you - no mention of a burn mark from a failed overclocking attempt?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shame on you - no mention of a burn mark from a failed overclocking attempt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shame on you - no mention of a burn mark from a failed overclocking attempt?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314649</id>
	<title>Too many people?</title>
	<author>Sperbels</author>
	<datestamp>1244803740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, that's twice in one century.  Maybe there's too many people on the planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , that 's twice in one century .
Maybe there 's too many people on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, that's twice in one century.
Maybe there's too many people on the planet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>dodobh</author>
	<datestamp>1244837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>However, it is a well known fact that one in a million chances happen 9 times out of 10.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>However , it is a well known fact that one in a million chances happen 9 times out of 10 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, it is a well known fact that one in a million chances happen 9 times out of 10.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312681</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1244838720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Friction due to deceleration, all that heat is in the air around the meteor, not the meteor itself.  Someone further up the thread posted a link explaining this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Friction due to deceleration , all that heat is in the air around the meteor , not the meteor itself .
Someone further up the thread posted a link explaining this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Friction due to deceleration, all that heat is in the air around the meteor, not the meteor itself.
Someone further up the thread posted a link explaining this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817</id>
	<title>Points for creativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great story to tell your parents after you've burned yourself with the crack pipe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great story to tell your parents after you 've burned yourself with the crack pipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great story to tell your parents after you've burned yourself with the crack pipe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315923</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1244812560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>First, meteors aren't hot.</p></div></blockquote><p>Any object travelling through the atmosphere at substantial speed is going to be hot (at least on its surface; once it hits, a meteor is going to cool off pretty quickly, since it doesn't spend a lot of time in the atmosphere, and the heating is just at the surface, which is why meteorites recovered just <i>after</i> they have landed tend not to be hot.)</p><blockquote><div><p>Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand. It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.</p></div></blockquote><p>Assuming it hit perpendicularly, rather than grazing. ("Bouncing" isn't quite accurate for a graze, but its near enough to be typically imprecise speech from a normal human describing the situation, rather than a lie.)</p><blockquote><div><p>Was the kid's hand blown off? No? Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.</p></div></blockquote><p>This assumes that its angle to the ground was the same as its angle with respect to the hand, which is an unwarranted assumption.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , meteors are n't hot.Any object travelling through the atmosphere at substantial speed is going to be hot ( at least on its surface ; once it hits , a meteor is going to cool off pretty quickly , since it does n't spend a lot of time in the atmosphere , and the heating is just at the surface , which is why meteorites recovered just after they have landed tend not to be hot .
) Second , if a " pea-sized piece of rock " is going fast enough to make " a foot wide crater in the ground , " it 's not going to be " bouncing off " shit , least of all this kid 's hand .
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.Assuming it hit perpendicularly , rather than grazing .
( " Bouncing " is n't quite accurate for a graze , but its near enough to be typically imprecise speech from a normal human describing the situation , rather than a lie .
) Was the kid 's hand blown off ?
No ? Then it did n't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.This assumes that its angle to the ground was the same as its angle with respect to the hand , which is an unwarranted assumption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, meteors aren't hot.Any object travelling through the atmosphere at substantial speed is going to be hot (at least on its surface; once it hits, a meteor is going to cool off pretty quickly, since it doesn't spend a lot of time in the atmosphere, and the heating is just at the surface, which is why meteorites recovered just after they have landed tend not to be hot.
)Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand.
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.Assuming it hit perpendicularly, rather than grazing.
("Bouncing" isn't quite accurate for a graze, but its near enough to be typically imprecise speech from a normal human describing the situation, rather than a lie.
)Was the kid's hand blown off?
No? Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.This assumes that its angle to the ground was the same as its angle with respect to the hand, which is an unwarranted assumption.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28320727</id>
	<title>Sawesome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244915940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is sad, yet also awesome:</p><p>It is totally <a href="http://www.qwantz.com/archive/001242.html" title="qwantz.com" rel="nofollow">sawesome</a> [qwantz.com]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is sad , yet also awesome : It is totally sawesome [ qwantz.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is sad, yet also awesome:It is totally sawesome [qwantz.com]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322203</id>
	<title>God Takes Potshot at Kid, Misses</title>
	<author>Spiralis Fractus</author>
	<datestamp>1244885340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...That should have been the title of the article, considering that the high-speed pea-sized ferromagnetic meteorite was basically a bullet from the heavens.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...And God apparently has lousy aim.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...That should have been the title of the article , considering that the high-speed pea-sized ferromagnetic meteorite was basically a bullet from the heavens .
...And God apparently has lousy aim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...That should have been the title of the article, considering that the high-speed pea-sized ferromagnetic meteorite was basically a bullet from the heavens.
...And God apparently has lousy aim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315287</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>manoelhc</author>
	<datestamp>1244807760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe he couldn't have a superpower, but if this rock is a kryptonite fragment...  Hey Clark, get way for germany!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he could n't have a superpower , but if this rock is a kryptonite fragment... Hey Clark , get way for germany !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he couldn't have a superpower, but if this rock is a kryptonite fragment...  Hey Clark, get way for germany!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314009</id>
	<title>be careful wlth archaic language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244800500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you do not treat archaic language with respect, it will smite you.</p><p>(The meteorite smote the boy.  He was smitten.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do not treat archaic language with respect , it will smite you .
( The meteorite smote the boy .
He was smitten .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you do not treat archaic language with respect, it will smite you.
(The meteorite smote the boy.
He was smitten.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312171</id>
	<title>Creepy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a nightmare about this just a couple of days ago!</p><p>I was in some icy place like the arctic or something, looking at the Aurora Borealis, which was beautiful, and then i saw one point get really bright and then in an instant i realized it was a meteorite and it was coming right for me. It landed about 5 feet from me and I had only enough time to be incredibly frightened and then try to turn to run, but it hit before i could even turn, and then rather than just ending, the dream sort of froze, and I had this terrible feeling that everything was over and I hadn't been able to do anything about it.</p><p>I woke up with chills, it was really fucking creepy. I almost never have nightmares either, and I've never had one like that. It was so real and just really impressed the helplessness we have when something like that is happening.</p><p>It's even weirder that it happened in real life. I don't really believe in premonitions but that is weird.<br>-Taylor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a nightmare about this just a couple of days ago ! I was in some icy place like the arctic or something , looking at the Aurora Borealis , which was beautiful , and then i saw one point get really bright and then in an instant i realized it was a meteorite and it was coming right for me .
It landed about 5 feet from me and I had only enough time to be incredibly frightened and then try to turn to run , but it hit before i could even turn , and then rather than just ending , the dream sort of froze , and I had this terrible feeling that everything was over and I had n't been able to do anything about it.I woke up with chills , it was really fucking creepy .
I almost never have nightmares either , and I 've never had one like that .
It was so real and just really impressed the helplessness we have when something like that is happening.It 's even weirder that it happened in real life .
I do n't really believe in premonitions but that is weird.-Taylor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a nightmare about this just a couple of days ago!I was in some icy place like the arctic or something, looking at the Aurora Borealis, which was beautiful, and then i saw one point get really bright and then in an instant i realized it was a meteorite and it was coming right for me.
It landed about 5 feet from me and I had only enough time to be incredibly frightened and then try to turn to run, but it hit before i could even turn, and then rather than just ending, the dream sort of froze, and I had this terrible feeling that everything was over and I hadn't been able to do anything about it.I woke up with chills, it was really fucking creepy.
I almost never have nightmares either, and I've never had one like that.
It was so real and just really impressed the helplessness we have when something like that is happening.It's even weirder that it happened in real life.
I don't really believe in premonitions but that is weird.-Taylor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312047</id>
	<title>I bet</title>
	<author>koan</author>
	<datestamp>1244836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet he has super powers now, which frankly, is just as likely as getting hit by a meteorite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet he has super powers now , which frankly , is just as likely as getting hit by a meteorite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet he has super powers now, which frankly, is just as likely as getting hit by a meteorite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127</id>
	<title>Re:Points for creativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's something about this boy's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that doesn't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.</p><p>--Newall</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's something about this boy 's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that does n't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.--Newall</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's something about this boy's pea-sized meteorite leaving a one-foot hole in the road that doesn't fit with the 1954 grapefruit-sized fragment that merely bounced off furniture and landed on a sleeping woman.--Newall</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312101</id>
	<title>Bad Astronomy Post on This</title>
	<author>CheshireCatCO</author>
	<datestamp>1244836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/12/a-boy-claims-he-was-hit-by-a-meteorite/" title="discovermagazine.com">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/12/a-boy-claims-he-was-hit-by-a-meteorite/</a> [discovermagazine.com]</p><p>Short story is that it's possible (although not as presented in the media right now), but be skeptical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/12/a-boy-claims-he-was-hit-by-a-meteorite/ [ discovermagazine.com ] Short story is that it 's possible ( although not as presented in the media right now ) , but be skeptical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/12/a-boy-claims-he-was-hit-by-a-meteorite/ [discovermagazine.com]Short story is that it's possible (although not as presented in the media right now), but be skeptical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312115</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1244836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he is, he'll be able to stop further meteorites from hitting him. But only metallic ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he is , he 'll be able to stop further meteorites from hitting him .
But only metallic ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he is, he'll be able to stop further meteorites from hitting him.
But only metallic ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313109</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1244840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting but I don't think it applies.  How big of a gun with what kind of ammo would you need to blow a foot-wide hole in a road?  Most typical rounds would just bury, or bounce.  Though I think the real problem here is just the article's lack of any kind of logic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting but I do n't think it applies .
How big of a gun with what kind of ammo would you need to blow a foot-wide hole in a road ?
Most typical rounds would just bury , or bounce .
Though I think the real problem here is just the article 's lack of any kind of logic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting but I don't think it applies.
How big of a gun with what kind of ammo would you need to blow a foot-wide hole in a road?
Most typical rounds would just bury, or bounce.
Though I think the real problem here is just the article's lack of any kind of logic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313833</id>
	<title>Re:Are you sure that's a boy???</title>
	<author>springbox</author>
	<datestamp>1244799660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-1, Meteorite</htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 , Meteorite</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1, Meteorite</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313121</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314555</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>phallstrom</author>
	<datestamp>1244803200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Probably a witch anyway.</p></div><p>Does he float?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably a witch anyway.Does he float ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably a witch anyway.Does he float?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314551</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244803200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting.</p><p>Im really sick of this "didja know the ak47 is the best weapon evar" attitude. The M16 certainly kills. A hole in your head, liver, lungs, etc can be made with either weapon. I dont care how "drug crazed" you are, that is going to take you down and most likely kill you.</p><p>Sure, the AK is a larger round, but its also a lot more inaccurate and its a heavy weapon. If we gave AKs to our Marines we'd be hearing from the "didja know the ak47 is the most inaccurate weapon" crowd and its attendant conspiracy theories.</p><p>The M16 is good enough for modern combat, drug fueled enemies or not. The M16's muzzle velocity plus its round size/weight is more than enough to cause hydrostatic shock. The round will tumble through the body just as well as the AK round.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting.Im really sick of this " didja know the ak47 is the best weapon evar " attitude .
The M16 certainly kills .
A hole in your head , liver , lungs , etc can be made with either weapon .
I dont care how " drug crazed " you are , that is going to take you down and most likely kill you.Sure , the AK is a larger round , but its also a lot more inaccurate and its a heavy weapon .
If we gave AKs to our Marines we 'd be hearing from the " didja know the ak47 is the most inaccurate weapon " crowd and its attendant conspiracy theories.The M16 is good enough for modern combat , drug fueled enemies or not .
The M16 's muzzle velocity plus its round size/weight is more than enough to cause hydrostatic shock .
The round will tumble through the body just as well as the AK round .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting.Im really sick of this "didja know the ak47 is the best weapon evar" attitude.
The M16 certainly kills.
A hole in your head, liver, lungs, etc can be made with either weapon.
I dont care how "drug crazed" you are, that is going to take you down and most likely kill you.Sure, the AK is a larger round, but its also a lot more inaccurate and its a heavy weapon.
If we gave AKs to our Marines we'd be hearing from the "didja know the ak47 is the most inaccurate weapon" crowd and its attendant conspiracy theories.The M16 is good enough for modern combat, drug fueled enemies or not.
The M16's muzzle velocity plus its round size/weight is more than enough to cause hydrostatic shock.
The round will tumble through the body just as well as the AK round.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322371</id>
	<title>Re:Watch out chilluns</title>
	<author>Flash13</author>
	<datestamp>1244887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder if the Germans are routing their meteors through Poland still?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if the Germans are routing their meteors through Poland still ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if the Germans are routing their meteors through Poland still?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312355</id>
	<title>uh-oh</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1244837640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now what? random genetic mutations? Green Skin? Red Laser Shooting Eyes?
<br>
Or maybe something cool like a sex hungry space alien ala Species?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now what ?
random genetic mutations ?
Green Skin ?
Red Laser Shooting Eyes ?
Or maybe something cool like a sex hungry space alien ala Species ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now what?
random genetic mutations?
Green Skin?
Red Laser Shooting Eyes?
Or maybe something cool like a sex hungry space alien ala Species?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312125</id>
	<title>Well, sucks to be him</title>
	<author>lanceran</author>
	<datestamp>1244836800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now this boy is never gonna win an actual lottery or get anything remotely exciting happen to him. I mean, what are the odds of getting hit by an asteroid AND seeing a leprechaun?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now this boy is never gon na win an actual lottery or get anything remotely exciting happen to him .
I mean , what are the odds of getting hit by an asteroid AND seeing a leprechaun ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now this boy is never gonna win an actual lottery or get anything remotely exciting happen to him.
I mean, what are the odds of getting hit by an asteroid AND seeing a leprechaun?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314579</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244803320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, and when someone gets shot with a  gun, we will call you.</p><p>In the mean time, lets stick with actual science dealing with falling rocks, mmmmK?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , and when someone gets shot with a gun , we will call you.In the mean time , lets stick with actual science dealing with falling rocks , mmmmK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, and when someone gets shot with a  gun, we will call you.In the mean time, lets stick with actual science dealing with falling rocks, mmmmK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318197</id>
	<title>six out of every seven of them land in water</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1244883960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ansgar Kortem director of Germany's Walter Hohmann Observatory: <i>six out of every seven of them land in water</i></p><p>The earth's surface is 70.8\% water and 29.2\% land. That means almost exactly five out of seven should be striking water and two should be hitting land.</p><p>Either there's something very very hinky going on that meteors are actively avoiding the land, or the observatory director is atrociously bad at math, or he's from some other planet with only half as much land surface compared to earth.</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ansgar Kortem director of Germany 's Walter Hohmann Observatory : six out of every seven of them land in waterThe earth 's surface is 70.8 \ % water and 29.2 \ % land .
That means almost exactly five out of seven should be striking water and two should be hitting land.Either there 's something very very hinky going on that meteors are actively avoiding the land , or the observatory director is atrociously bad at math , or he 's from some other planet with only half as much land surface compared to earth.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ansgar Kortem director of Germany's Walter Hohmann Observatory: six out of every seven of them land in waterThe earth's surface is 70.8\% water and 29.2\% land.
That means almost exactly five out of seven should be striking water and two should be hitting land.Either there's something very very hinky going on that meteors are actively avoiding the land, or the observatory director is atrociously bad at math, or he's from some other planet with only half as much land surface compared to earth.-</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314483</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244802900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you try some physics?</p><p>Some things you might want to think about:<br>1) F=M*A<br>2) It's pea sized<br>3) It's been moving through the atmosphere<br>4) It's decelerating.<br>5) The kids wasn't standing at the edge of the atmosphere</p><p>I am assuming you can count to 5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you try some physics ? Some things you might want to think about : 1 ) F = M * A2 ) It 's pea sized3 ) It 's been moving through the atmosphere4 ) It 's decelerating.5 ) The kids was n't standing at the edge of the atmosphereI am assuming you can count to 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you try some physics?Some things you might want to think about:1) F=M*A2) It's pea sized3) It's been moving through the atmosphere4) It's decelerating.5) The kids wasn't standing at the edge of the atmosphereI am assuming you can count to 5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312767</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1244839020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly he is some sort of Cylon or Terminator as the magnetic rock was attracted to him...</p><p>Curiously it his his hand, which means either Luke Skywalker or a certain state alchemist...</p><p>So I am a bit torn as to if we should mob him or not. Better burn him just to be sure. Probably a witch anyway.</p><p>Also if he was like Magneto, he would probably make the meteor not hit him I would guess. Which would make him sort sort of Anti-Magneto, his arch nemesis. Which ironically are quite common and Magneto doesn't really like them either. Unless you are in a alternative universe, in which case the opposite would be true.</p><p>Its Friday and I am ready to go home now...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly he is some sort of Cylon or Terminator as the magnetic rock was attracted to him...Curiously it his his hand , which means either Luke Skywalker or a certain state alchemist...So I am a bit torn as to if we should mob him or not .
Better burn him just to be sure .
Probably a witch anyway.Also if he was like Magneto , he would probably make the meteor not hit him I would guess .
Which would make him sort sort of Anti-Magneto , his arch nemesis .
Which ironically are quite common and Magneto does n't really like them either .
Unless you are in a alternative universe , in which case the opposite would be true.Its Friday and I am ready to go home now... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly he is some sort of Cylon or Terminator as the magnetic rock was attracted to him...Curiously it his his hand, which means either Luke Skywalker or a certain state alchemist...So I am a bit torn as to if we should mob him or not.
Better burn him just to be sure.
Probably a witch anyway.Also if he was like Magneto, he would probably make the meteor not hit him I would guess.
Which would make him sort sort of Anti-Magneto, his arch nemesis.
Which ironically are quite common and Magneto doesn't really like them either.
Unless you are in a alternative universe, in which case the opposite would be true.Its Friday and I am ready to go home now... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314165</id>
	<title>Death From Above</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244801400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred.</p></div><p>How do you know that no one got hit before that point? We've barely been keeping good records that long.</p><p>And what about the possibility of someone getting hit and killed with no witnesses around?</p><p>We really just don't have enough information. The sample size is laughably small to be able to extrapolate useful statistics.</p><p>Of course, I've never met a statistic that <b>wasn't</b> based on a laughably small sample size, but that's another topic.</p><p>P.S. How in the fuck do I make Slashdot make a line break? The "enter" key used to work just fine but now it doesn't. The line spacing looks right in the editor until I hit the preview button, then it magically disappears. I've tried double spacing, html tags... nothing seems to work. Am I just stupid?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred.How do you know that no one got hit before that point ?
We 've barely been keeping good records that long.And what about the possibility of someone getting hit and killed with no witnesses around ? We really just do n't have enough information .
The sample size is laughably small to be able to extrapolate useful statistics.Of course , I 've never met a statistic that was n't based on a laughably small sample size , but that 's another topic.P.S .
How in the fuck do I make Slashdot make a line break ?
The " enter " key used to work just fine but now it does n't .
The line spacing looks right in the editor until I hit the preview button , then it magically disappears .
I 've tried double spacing , html tags... nothing seems to work .
Am I just stupid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two instances of such an event in less than 60 years does not automatically invalidate the thousands of years prior where such an event had not occurred.How do you know that no one got hit before that point?
We've barely been keeping good records that long.And what about the possibility of someone getting hit and killed with no witnesses around?We really just don't have enough information.
The sample size is laughably small to be able to extrapolate useful statistics.Of course, I've never met a statistic that wasn't based on a laughably small sample size, but that's another topic.P.S.
How in the fuck do I make Slashdot make a line break?
The "enter" key used to work just fine but now it doesn't.
The line spacing looks right in the editor until I hit the preview button, then it magically disappears.
I've tried double spacing, html tags... nothing seems to work.
Am I just stupid?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313021</id>
	<title>What the meteor really is..</title>
	<author>keenanvito</author>
	<datestamp>1244839860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The meteor shown in the picture is actually a tiny piece of the Allspark.  Which would explain why he survived and the cars are all tiny in the photo.  We'll just wait for the first Decepticon Jetta to attack the driver.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The meteor shown in the picture is actually a tiny piece of the Allspark .
Which would explain why he survived and the cars are all tiny in the photo .
We 'll just wait for the first Decepticon Jetta to attack the driver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The meteor shown in the picture is actually a tiny piece of the Allspark.
Which would explain why he survived and the cars are all tiny in the photo.
We'll just wait for the first Decepticon Jetta to attack the driver.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317917</id>
	<title>1-in-bignumber being hit,1-in-million surviving it</title>
	<author>CyberNigma</author>
	<datestamp>1244836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah probably 1 in a big-assed-number chance of getting hit by a meteorite, but once someone gets hit, then they probably means there's a 1 in a million chance of that person surviving said hit...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah probably 1 in a big-assed-number chance of getting hit by a meteorite , but once someone gets hit , then they probably means there 's a 1 in a million chance of that person surviving said hit.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah probably 1 in a big-assed-number chance of getting hit by a meteorite, but once someone gets hit, then they probably means there's a 1 in a million chance of that person surviving said hit...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312385</id>
	<title>Re:More likely shrapnel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand.</p></div><p>I guess that would drop the charges against the meteor from attempted murder to criminal negligence. Although I am not a lawyer. Or a meteor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand.I guess that would drop the charges against the meteor from attempted murder to criminal negligence .
Although I am not a lawyer .
Or a meteor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand.I guess that would drop the charges against the meteor from attempted murder to criminal negligence.
Although I am not a lawyer.
Or a meteor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315323</id>
	<title>Re:yikes</title>
	<author>WoRLoKKeD</author>
	<datestamp>1244808060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. Hit by a meteorite, late for school AND ginger?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
Hit by a meteorite , late for school AND ginger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
Hit by a meteorite, late for school AND ginger?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314331</id>
	<title>Interesting Probability</title>
	<author>PleaseFearMe</author>
	<datestamp>1244802240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would actually be more than 6 billion because you'll have to account for all the people that lived at least after 1954, when the previous occurrence happened.  How you thought about the probability is very interesting.  Instead of treating it as the proportion of the earth surface that is covered with a human body part, you calculated the probability in relation to the number of people actually hit.  I think this is sort of like changing a function from the time domain to the frequency domain.  Same function, but different way of looking at it.  Very nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would actually be more than 6 billion because you 'll have to account for all the people that lived at least after 1954 , when the previous occurrence happened .
How you thought about the probability is very interesting .
Instead of treating it as the proportion of the earth surface that is covered with a human body part , you calculated the probability in relation to the number of people actually hit .
I think this is sort of like changing a function from the time domain to the frequency domain .
Same function , but different way of looking at it .
Very nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would actually be more than 6 billion because you'll have to account for all the people that lived at least after 1954, when the previous occurrence happened.
How you thought about the probability is very interesting.
Instead of treating it as the proportion of the earth surface that is covered with a human body part, you calculated the probability in relation to the number of people actually hit.
I think this is sort of like changing a function from the time domain to the frequency domain.
Same function, but different way of looking at it.
Very nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313137</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244840280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>superman that ho!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>superman that ho !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>superman that ho!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319377</id>
	<title>Re:I'm calling BS on this one.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244903460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not the meteor that bounces off his hand. It is his hand that is bounced by the meteor.</p><p>Wait until 2012 and everyone will win that lottery! Nimbiru is coming!</p><p>Why don't they show a picture of the crater ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not the meteor that bounces off his hand .
It is his hand that is bounced by the meteor.Wait until 2012 and everyone will win that lottery !
Nimbiru is coming ! Why do n't they show a picture of the crater ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not the meteor that bounces off his hand.
It is his hand that is bounced by the meteor.Wait until 2012 and everyone will win that lottery!
Nimbiru is coming!Why don't they show a picture of the crater ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313501</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1244838120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you really just say meteors aren't hot? They <b>burn up in our atmosphere how wouldn't they be hot. Heat is cause when anything enters the atmosphere at high speeds it is the same reason that all space crafts have special heat resistant tiles on their underbodies for when they reenter the atmosphere.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you really just say meteors are n't hot ?
They burn up in our atmosphere how would n't they be hot .
Heat is cause when anything enters the atmosphere at high speeds it is the same reason that all space crafts have special heat resistant tiles on their underbodies for when they reenter the atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you really just say meteors aren't hot?
They burn up in our atmosphere how wouldn't they be hot.
Heat is cause when anything enters the atmosphere at high speeds it is the same reason that all space crafts have special heat resistant tiles on their underbodies for when they reenter the atmosphere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316117</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1244814180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and what's more, the proper past participle of "smite" is "smitten", not "smote".</p><p>On top of that, I SERIOUSLY doubt the German kid said what they claim.  He probably said something more like, "Zuerst hab' ich einen grossen Lichtball gesehen, und dann fuehlt ich ploetzlich Handschmerz." Und so weiter...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and what 's more , the proper past participle of " smite " is " smitten " , not " smote " .On top of that , I SERIOUSLY doubt the German kid said what they claim .
He probably said something more like , " Zuerst hab ' ich einen grossen Lichtball gesehen , und dann fuehlt ich ploetzlich Handschmerz .
" Und so weiter.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and what's more, the proper past participle of "smite" is "smitten", not "smote".On top of that, I SERIOUSLY doubt the German kid said what they claim.
He probably said something more like, "Zuerst hab' ich einen grossen Lichtball gesehen, und dann fuehlt ich ploetzlich Handschmerz.
" Und so weiter...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312697</id>
	<title>Phil Plait (The Bad Astronomer)'s take on it</title>
	<author>Arkan\_Wolfshade</author>
	<datestamp>1244838780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/" title="discovermagazine.com" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/</a> [discovermagazine.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/ [ discovermagazine.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/ [discovermagazine.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313471</id>
	<title>Re:Pic of hand, pea-meteorite and impact</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a bunch of bullshit.  30000 MPH after traveling through the atmosphere?  LOL, right.</p><p>What a poor picture of the "crater" too.  That doesn't even "sort of" look like an impact crater.  Not even close.  It's just a regular road pothole.</p><p>Anyway, even at 30000 MPH that pebble would not make a 1 foot crater in rock + asphalt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a bunch of bullshit .
30000 MPH after traveling through the atmosphere ?
LOL , right.What a poor picture of the " crater " too .
That does n't even " sort of " look like an impact crater .
Not even close .
It 's just a regular road pothole.Anyway , even at 30000 MPH that pebble would not make a 1 foot crater in rock + asphalt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a bunch of bullshit.
30000 MPH after traveling through the atmosphere?
LOL, right.What a poor picture of the "crater" too.
That doesn't even "sort of" look like an impact crater.
Not even close.
It's just a regular road pothole.Anyway, even at 30000 MPH that pebble would not make a 1 foot crater in rock + asphalt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312221</id>
	<title>Lightning shaped scar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>For everyone who can't see it because the image was cropped, I can confirm that the scar is indeed shaped exactly like a lightning bolt. In line with the prophecy from 1979 that states that "the boy who lived" with "lightning in his hand" may one day confront and defeat the terrifying Asteroid menace, I believe we have finally found our champion, the one who finally end the Asteroid threat to all of Earth once and for all. But we'll have to work hard to keep more Asteroids from hitting him in the meantime... are we up to it? I believe so. It is - <i>he</i> is... perhaps our greatest hope.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For everyone who ca n't see it because the image was cropped , I can confirm that the scar is indeed shaped exactly like a lightning bolt .
In line with the prophecy from 1979 that states that " the boy who lived " with " lightning in his hand " may one day confront and defeat the terrifying Asteroid menace , I believe we have finally found our champion , the one who finally end the Asteroid threat to all of Earth once and for all .
But we 'll have to work hard to keep more Asteroids from hitting him in the meantime... are we up to it ?
I believe so .
It is - he is... perhaps our greatest hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For everyone who can't see it because the image was cropped, I can confirm that the scar is indeed shaped exactly like a lightning bolt.
In line with the prophecy from 1979 that states that "the boy who lived" with "lightning in his hand" may one day confront and defeat the terrifying Asteroid menace, I believe we have finally found our champion, the one who finally end the Asteroid threat to all of Earth once and for all.
But we'll have to work hard to keep more Asteroids from hitting him in the meantime... are we up to it?
I believe so.
It is - he is... perhaps our greatest hope.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313235</id>
	<title>Aiming shot</title>
	<author>RichMan</author>
	<datestamp>1244797500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see the aliens have successfully tested their aiming mechanism.</p><p>We should expect the full barrage any time now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see the aliens have successfully tested their aiming mechanism.We should expect the full barrage any time now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see the aliens have successfully tested their aiming mechanism.We should expect the full barrage any time now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312601</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1244838420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes it is true that some burn off all of the layers and become in covered in ice, but some don't. Meteors have been found both still hot and covered in ice. and I hit submit when I went to hit edit, which is why I'm responding to myself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it is true that some burn off all of the layers and become in covered in ice , but some do n't .
Meteors have been found both still hot and covered in ice .
and I hit submit when I went to hit edit , which is why I 'm responding to myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it is true that some burn off all of the layers and become in covered in ice, but some don't.
Meteors have been found both still hot and covered in ice.
and I hit submit when I went to hit edit, which is why I'm responding to myself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312071</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?</p></div><p>I'm not good with statistics, but since it was 2 people, over a period of 55 years, wouldn't it be higher than 1:3 billion?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it closer to one in a few billion , since there 's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences ? I 'm not good with statistics , but since it was 2 people , over a period of 55 years , would n't it be higher than 1 : 3 billion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?I'm not good with statistics, but since it was 2 people, over a period of 55 years, wouldn't it be higher than 1:3 billion?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312349</id>
	<title>odds</title>
	<author>paulpach</author>
	<datestamp>1244837640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
2 people hit out of 6 billion in the world, so odds are 1 in 3 billion or the PDOOMA 1 in 1 million FTA
</p><p>
what are the odds that either the androgynous boy or some reporter made the whole thing up?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 people hit out of 6 billion in the world , so odds are 1 in 3 billion or the PDOOMA 1 in 1 million FTA what are the odds that either the androgynous boy or some reporter made the whole thing up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
2 people hit out of 6 billion in the world, so odds are 1 in 3 billion or the PDOOMA 1 in 1 million FTA

what are the odds that either the androgynous boy or some reporter made the whole thing up?
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315187</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Joe Snipe</author>
	<datestamp>1244807040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See this one? <a href="http://nedroidcomics.livejournal.com/213128.html" title="livejournal.com">Decapitation, 1993</a> [livejournal.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See this one ?
Decapitation , 1993 [ livejournal.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See this one?
Decapitation, 1993 [livejournal.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321165</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244919300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YAY Terry Pratchet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YAY Terry Pratchet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YAY Terry Pratchet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311883</id>
	<title>skeptical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the oldest article on google news is from 16 hours ago, and is from the Sun.  How reputable a source is this?  When did this happen?  I wanted to go tell everyone how interesting this was-- now I am unsure of for what reason is it interesting</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the oldest article on google news is from 16 hours ago , and is from the Sun .
How reputable a source is this ?
When did this happen ?
I wanted to go tell everyone how interesting this was-- now I am unsure of for what reason is it interesting</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the oldest article on google news is from 16 hours ago, and is from the Sun.
How reputable a source is this?
When did this happen?
I wanted to go tell everyone how interesting this was-- now I am unsure of for what reason is it interesting</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425</id>
	<title>Pic of hand, pea-meteorite and impact</title>
	<author>EEDAm</author>
	<datestamp>1244837880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Much better; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192503/Close-encounter-rock-kind-Schoolboy-survives-direct-hit-meteorite-travelling-30-000mph.html/" title="dailymail.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192503/Close-encounter-rock-kind-Schoolboy-survives-direct-hit-meteorite-travelling-30-000mph.html/</a> [dailymail.co.uk]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Much better ; http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192503/Close-encounter-rock-kind-Schoolboy-survives-direct-hit-meteorite-travelling-30-000mph.html/ [ dailymail.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much better; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192503/Close-encounter-rock-kind-Schoolboy-survives-direct-hit-meteorite-travelling-30-000mph.html/ [dailymail.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317181</id>
	<title>Smote?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244825280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, smote?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , smote ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, smote?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314239</id>
	<title>Original Source</title>
	<author>tenco</author>
	<datestamp>1244801760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/9/news-122286237/detail.html" title="derwesten.de">http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/9/news-122286237/detail.html</a> [derwesten.de]
<p>
Well, and I don't know where the details in TFA here posted came from. Actually, the german article states some facts differently (I'll try a translation, umlauts were replaced by me, because<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. sucks at Unicode):</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Erst habe ich nur einen grossen, weissen Lichtkegel gesehen. Meine Hand hat weh getan, dann hat es geknallt."</p></div><p>"First I saw only a big, white cone of light. My hand hurt, then there was a bang."</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Nachdem ich das weisse Licht gesehen habe, habe ich an meiner Hand etwas gespuert. Ich denke, dass mich der Meteorit gestreift hat. Vielleicht war es aber auch nur die Hitze", berichtet er und zeigt den Ruecken seiner linken Hand. Die rund zehn Zentimeter lange Brandwunde ueberdeckt bereits eine Kruste. "Das Geraeusch, das folgte, klang wie das Reissen einer Steinplatte und war ziemlich laut", erinnert sich Gerrit und deutet auf den kleinen Kreis aufgeplatzten Asphalts zu seinen Fuessen.</p></div><p>"After I saw the white light, I felt something at my hand. I think, the meteorite streaked me. But maybe it was only the heat." he reported and shows the back of his left hand. A brand around 10 centimeters long is already covered by an eschar. "The sound that followed, sounded like a paver being ripped apart and it was pretty loud", he comemorates and points to a small circle of burst open bitumen by his feet.</p><p>END OF TRANSLATION</p><p>There's also a picture where one can see the "crater" in front:
<a href="http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/10/news-122286237/imageshow.html?resourceId=picture23923142" title="derwesten.de">http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/10/news-122286237/imageshow.html?resourceId=picture23923142</a> [derwesten.de] (the caption reads: "Gerrit Blank shows his brand and the meteorite that streaked him, while it was falling, near the "crater".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/9/news-122286237/detail.html [ derwesten.de ] Well , and I do n't know where the details in TFA here posted came from .
Actually , the german article states some facts differently ( I 'll try a translation , umlauts were replaced by me , because / .
sucks at Unicode ) : " Erst habe ich nur einen grossen , weissen Lichtkegel gesehen .
Meine Hand hat weh getan , dann hat es geknallt .
" " First I saw only a big , white cone of light .
My hand hurt , then there was a bang .
" " Nachdem ich das weisse Licht gesehen habe , habe ich an meiner Hand etwas gespuert .
Ich denke , dass mich der Meteorit gestreift hat .
Vielleicht war es aber auch nur die Hitze " , berichtet er und zeigt den Ruecken seiner linken Hand .
Die rund zehn Zentimeter lange Brandwunde ueberdeckt bereits eine Kruste .
" Das Geraeusch , das folgte , klang wie das Reissen einer Steinplatte und war ziemlich laut " , erinnert sich Gerrit und deutet auf den kleinen Kreis aufgeplatzten Asphalts zu seinen Fuessen .
" After I saw the white light , I felt something at my hand .
I think , the meteorite streaked me .
But maybe it was only the heat .
" he reported and shows the back of his left hand .
A brand around 10 centimeters long is already covered by an eschar .
" The sound that followed , sounded like a paver being ripped apart and it was pretty loud " , he comemorates and points to a small circle of burst open bitumen by his feet.END OF TRANSLATIONThere 's also a picture where one can see the " crater " in front : http : //www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/10/news-122286237/imageshow.html ? resourceId = picture23923142 [ derwesten.de ] ( the caption reads : " Gerrit Blank shows his brand and the meteorite that streaked him , while it was falling , near the " crater " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/9/news-122286237/detail.html [derwesten.de]

Well, and I don't know where the details in TFA here posted came from.
Actually, the german article states some facts differently (I'll try a translation, umlauts were replaced by me, because /.
sucks at Unicode):"Erst habe ich nur einen grossen, weissen Lichtkegel gesehen.
Meine Hand hat weh getan, dann hat es geknallt.
""First I saw only a big, white cone of light.
My hand hurt, then there was a bang.
""Nachdem ich das weisse Licht gesehen habe, habe ich an meiner Hand etwas gespuert.
Ich denke, dass mich der Meteorit gestreift hat.
Vielleicht war es aber auch nur die Hitze", berichtet er und zeigt den Ruecken seiner linken Hand.
Die rund zehn Zentimeter lange Brandwunde ueberdeckt bereits eine Kruste.
"Das Geraeusch, das folgte, klang wie das Reissen einer Steinplatte und war ziemlich laut", erinnert sich Gerrit und deutet auf den kleinen Kreis aufgeplatzten Asphalts zu seinen Fuessen.
"After I saw the white light, I felt something at my hand.
I think, the meteorite streaked me.
But maybe it was only the heat.
" he reported and shows the back of his left hand.
A brand around 10 centimeters long is already covered by an eschar.
"The sound that followed, sounded like a paver being ripped apart and it was pretty loud", he comemorates and points to a small circle of burst open bitumen by his feet.END OF TRANSLATIONThere's also a picture where one can see the "crater" in front:
http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/staedte/essen/2009/6/10/news-122286237/imageshow.html?resourceId=picture23923142 [derwesten.de] (the caption reads: "Gerrit Blank shows his brand and the meteorite that streaked him, while it was falling, near the "crater".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315671</id>
	<title>Re:Creepy...</title>
	<author>shadowofwind</author>
	<datestamp>1244810400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe your premonition.  I think for you it wasn't about the boy, it was about something else, and the boy's experience was just the same kind of image but not in a dream.</p><p>I don't think premonitions can be trusted to tell you what to do - they don't point in the direction of right and wrong.  And desiring them is generally unhealthy and dangerous, so its just as well for them to be rare and for people to be skeptical.  But it might be a useful warning if you do the right thing with it.</p><p>Yeah I know I'm likely to get modded crazy by people who don't know WTF I'm talking about, and for being unwilling to publicly post more supporting data.  I've already heard all the arguments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe your premonition .
I think for you it was n't about the boy , it was about something else , and the boy 's experience was just the same kind of image but not in a dream.I do n't think premonitions can be trusted to tell you what to do - they do n't point in the direction of right and wrong .
And desiring them is generally unhealthy and dangerous , so its just as well for them to be rare and for people to be skeptical .
But it might be a useful warning if you do the right thing with it.Yeah I know I 'm likely to get modded crazy by people who do n't know WTF I 'm talking about , and for being unwilling to publicly post more supporting data .
I 've already heard all the arguments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe your premonition.
I think for you it wasn't about the boy, it was about something else, and the boy's experience was just the same kind of image but not in a dream.I don't think premonitions can be trusted to tell you what to do - they don't point in the direction of right and wrong.
And desiring them is generally unhealthy and dangerous, so its just as well for them to be rare and for people to be skeptical.
But it might be a useful warning if you do the right thing with it.Yeah I know I'm likely to get modded crazy by people who don't know WTF I'm talking about, and for being unwilling to publicly post more supporting data.
I've already heard all the arguments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314007</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>Zantetsuken</author>
	<datestamp>1244800500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it's obviously the power to remember things backwards! Granted it's completely useless since he can't remember things that haven't happened yet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's obviously the power to remember things backwards !
Granted it 's completely useless since he ca n't remember things that have n't happened yet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's obviously the power to remember things backwards!
Granted it's completely useless since he can't remember things that haven't happened yet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312827</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244839200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only if you count his uniqueness as a member of society. If you're counting the actual odds of a meteorite entering the atmosphere and hitting a person, surely the odds are incredibly low. Most don't even reach the ground!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you count his uniqueness as a member of society .
If you 're counting the actual odds of a meteorite entering the atmosphere and hitting a person , surely the odds are incredibly low .
Most do n't even reach the ground !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you count his uniqueness as a member of society.
If you're counting the actual odds of a meteorite entering the atmosphere and hitting a person, surely the odds are incredibly low.
Most don't even reach the ground!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315777</id>
	<title>Isaac Newton could have told you this kid's a liar</title>
	<author>Michael G. Kaplan</author>
	<datestamp>1244811300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newton already figured out that a high velocity object will stop once it transfers its momentum into the medium it is penetrating.  This concept is known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact\_depth" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">
Impact Depth and Wikipedia has an article on it</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>From the article: "An iron meteorite with a length of 1.3 m would punch through the atmosphere, a smaller one would be stopped in the air and drop down by the gravitational pull."</p><p>So this pea sized meteorite would have been stopped high up in the atmosphere and then it would have fallen at terminal velocity until it hit the ground.  It is absolutely impossible for a meteor that size to have blasted a crater into asphalt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newton already figured out that a high velocity object will stop once it transfers its momentum into the medium it is penetrating .
This concept is known as Impact Depth and Wikipedia has an article on it [ wikipedia.org ] .From the article : " An iron meteorite with a length of 1.3 m would punch through the atmosphere , a smaller one would be stopped in the air and drop down by the gravitational pull .
" So this pea sized meteorite would have been stopped high up in the atmosphere and then it would have fallen at terminal velocity until it hit the ground .
It is absolutely impossible for a meteor that size to have blasted a crater into asphalt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newton already figured out that a high velocity object will stop once it transfers its momentum into the medium it is penetrating.
This concept is known as 
Impact Depth and Wikipedia has an article on it [wikipedia.org].From the article: "An iron meteorite with a length of 1.3 m would punch through the atmosphere, a smaller one would be stopped in the air and drop down by the gravitational pull.
"So this pea sized meteorite would have been stopped high up in the atmosphere and then it would have fallen at terminal velocity until it hit the ground.
It is absolutely impossible for a meteor that size to have blasted a crater into asphalt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312793</id>
	<title>Are we sure he's still alive?</title>
	<author>sunking2</author>
	<datestamp>1244839140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only pictures I see seem to be of his sister.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only pictures I see seem to be of his sister .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only pictures I see seem to be of his sister.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312275</id>
	<title>Can he keep it?</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1244837340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you get hit by a valuable space rock and survive, can you keep it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you get hit by a valuable space rock and survive , can you keep it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you get hit by a valuable space rock and survive, can you keep it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313831</id>
	<title>Re:Can he keep it?</title>
	<author>lavacano201014</author>
	<datestamp>1244799660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe after the scientists verify it's a space rock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe after the scientists verify it 's a space rock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe after the scientists verify it's a space rock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316063</id>
	<title>Google News oddity - or not</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1244813820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the German Google News <a href="http://news.google.de/news?pz=1&amp;ned=de&amp;hl=de&amp;q=vom+meteorit+getroffen" title="google.de">http://news.google.de/news?pz=1&amp;ned=de&amp;hl=de&amp;q=vom+meteorit+getroffen</a> [google.de]there are 5 articles in German about this. One of course by infamous Bild.de - "Space attack on Gerrit". The meteorite sure hasn't hit the news here... Do I see some skeptic editors?</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the German Google News http : //news.google.de/news ? pz = 1&amp;ned = de&amp;hl = de&amp;q = vom + meteorit + getroffen [ google.de ] there are 5 articles in German about this .
One of course by infamous Bild.de - " Space attack on Gerrit " .
The meteorite sure has n't hit the news here... Do I see some skeptic editors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the German Google News http://news.google.de/news?pz=1&amp;ned=de&amp;hl=de&amp;q=vom+meteorit+getroffen [google.de]there are 5 articles in German about this.
One of course by infamous Bild.de - "Space attack on Gerrit".
The meteorite sure hasn't hit the news here... Do I see some skeptic editors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314937</id>
	<title>...becomes master fapper...</title>
	<author>goga\_russian</author>
	<datestamp>1244805540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>will be showing his new skillz at 7.

does he get to keep or at least name it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>will be showing his new skillz at 7 . does he get to keep or at least name it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will be showing his new skillz at 7.

does he get to keep or at least name it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316969</id>
	<title>not bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244822400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She's cute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She 's cute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She's cute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312667</id>
	<title>Re:yikes</title>
	<author>billius</author>
	<datestamp>1244838660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, it's the only way <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Lottery" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">to ensure a good harvest</a> [wikipedia.org]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , it 's the only way to ensure a good harvest [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, it's the only way to ensure a good harvest [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321203</id>
	<title>Re:BWAHAHAHAHA BULLSHIT</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1244919540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did it occur to you that it may have grazed his hand, rather than striking it directly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did it occur to you that it may have grazed his hand , rather than striking it directly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did it occur to you that it may have grazed his hand, rather than striking it directly?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317221</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244825640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be the same odds as a commodore 64 running as a webserver on the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be the same odds as a commodore 64 running as a webserver on the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be the same odds as a commodore 64 running as a webserver on the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314413</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244802600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's in Germany.  He could technically be in a bar (and even drink).</p><p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal\_drinking\_age" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><blockquote><div><p>Possession or consumption of alcohol by minors is not outlawed, but it is illegal to sell them alcohol or let them drink in public below the respective drinking age. "Normal" alcoholic beverages (not distilled beverages) may be consumed by minors in public when in presence of a legal guardian; drinking in private is not controlled. The restrictions on distilled beverages apply also to mixed drinks containing them.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's in Germany .
He could technically be in a bar ( and even drink ) .From Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] : Possession or consumption of alcohol by minors is not outlawed , but it is illegal to sell them alcohol or let them drink in public below the respective drinking age .
" Normal " alcoholic beverages ( not distilled beverages ) may be consumed by minors in public when in presence of a legal guardian ; drinking in private is not controlled .
The restrictions on distilled beverages apply also to mixed drinks containing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's in Germany.
He could technically be in a bar (and even drink).From Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]:Possession or consumption of alcohol by minors is not outlawed, but it is illegal to sell them alcohol or let them drink in public below the respective drinking age.
"Normal" alcoholic beverages (not distilled beverages) may be consumed by minors in public when in presence of a legal guardian; drinking in private is not controlled.
The restrictions on distilled beverages apply also to mixed drinks containing them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314517</id>
	<title>Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244803080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a hoax.<br>It's the same boy who claimed Nasa had made errors last year and was found to be a hoax.</p><p>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13723-no-truth-to-claims-that-13yearold-found-nasa-error.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a hoax.It 's the same boy who claimed Nasa had made errors last year and was found to be a hoax.http : //www.newscientist.com/article/dn13723-no-truth-to-claims-that-13yearold-found-nasa-error.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a hoax.It's the same boy who claimed Nasa had made errors last year and was found to be a hoax.http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13723-no-truth-to-claims-that-13yearold-found-nasa-error.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313467</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>sulliwan</author>
	<datestamp>1244798280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being directly struck, yes, the odds are considerably lower than one in a million. However, chances of being killed as a result of a bolide impact are significantly higher, since when a really big one hits, the deathtoll can be in the millions or even billions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being directly struck , yes , the odds are considerably lower than one in a million .
However , chances of being killed as a result of a bolide impact are significantly higher , since when a really big one hits , the deathtoll can be in the millions or even billions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being directly struck, yes, the odds are considerably lower than one in a million.
However, chances of being killed as a result of a bolide impact are significantly higher, since when a really big one hits, the deathtoll can be in the millions or even billions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317245</id>
	<title>Re:God is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that going to make randy, like Zeus?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that going to make randy , like Zeus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that going to make randy, like Zeus?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312935</id>
	<title>Re:yikes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244839560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on, he's only german. If the entire world teams up on him we -might- have a chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , he 's only german .
If the entire world teams up on him we -might- have a chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, he's only german.
If the entire world teams up on him we -might- have a chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315657</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244810340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually feel bad for the 3rd guy, not this kid.<br>A nail gun THEN stepping on a rake?  Oh hell no, that's just plain nasty man, getting hit with rakes is just not nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually feel bad for the 3rd guy , not this kid.A nail gun THEN stepping on a rake ?
Oh hell no , that 's just plain nasty man , getting hit with rakes is just not nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually feel bad for the 3rd guy, not this kid.A nail gun THEN stepping on a rake?
Oh hell no, that's just plain nasty man, getting hit with rakes is just not nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313</id>
	<title>"Smitten", not "smote"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... unless the boy as doing the smiting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... unless the boy as doing the smiting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... unless the boy as doing the smiting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314285</id>
	<title>Mythbusters?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244801940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone submit this to be tested.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone submit this to be tested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone submit this to be tested.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311829</id>
	<title>Today...</title>
	<author>Joe Snipe</author>
	<datestamp>1244835720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FML.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FML .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FML.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313913</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>richmaine</author>
	<datestamp>1244800080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, it's the Telegraph. You expect maybe accurate reporting or decent writing? If so, I have some waterfront land in Florida to sell you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , it 's the Telegraph .
You expect maybe accurate reporting or decent writing ?
If so , I have some waterfront land in Florida to sell you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, it's the Telegraph.
You expect maybe accurate reporting or decent writing?
If so, I have some waterfront land in Florida to sell you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312491</id>
	<title>echte grammar nazi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hier ist meine chance ein "grammar nazi" zu sein!</p><p>eine minute, bitte.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hier ist meine chance ein " grammar nazi " zu sein ! eine minute , bitte .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hier ist meine chance ein "grammar nazi" zu sein!eine minute, bitte.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315353</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>dotgain</author>
	<datestamp>1244808300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>IANARS anyway, but to take issue with your points in order:
<ol>
<li>That's implicit in the measurement of previous strikes.  If we already know how many make it to the ground in a given time period, the amount that break up in the atmosphere and don't make it is irrelevant.</li>
<li>Wouldn't matter - assuming a uniform distribution of strikes across the planet (which probably isn't correct, but that's not the point here), your chances would not vary no matter where you went (ignoring buildings, where the strength of the roof would complicate the equation).</li>
<li>You're talking about the protection afforded by a roof over one's head.  I guess you could attempt to average the amount of time people spend outside, and assume that any roof will withstand any meteor strike (or factor roof quality in, complicating things even further).  You do raise a good point, and it's beyond me to elaborate further.</li>
<li>Should be implicit in the question.  We're either interested in the probability being hit over a time period of the average life expectancy, or some arbitrary period, like 1 in x billion per year per capita.  Without specifying a timeframe the question would be void.  e.g. "What's the chances of winning (a given) lottery?".  It would depend on whether you only play it exactly once, or whether you played it x number of times.<p>
Risking being hit by a meteor is analogous buying a lottery ticket with an extreme probability of not-winning for every second of your life.  I say analogous, because I over-simplify the 'every second' bit.  An extremely unfortunate person <i>could</i> be hit by two different meteorites in the same second.</p><p>
But then, someone so unlucky would already have been killed by something else, right<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>
Again, not claiming any sort of authority here, maybe someone who IARS will be along soon to hand me my shiny metal ass on a plate, just engaging your point.</p></li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANARS anyway , but to take issue with your points in order : That 's implicit in the measurement of previous strikes .
If we already know how many make it to the ground in a given time period , the amount that break up in the atmosphere and do n't make it is irrelevant .
Would n't matter - assuming a uniform distribution of strikes across the planet ( which probably is n't correct , but that 's not the point here ) , your chances would not vary no matter where you went ( ignoring buildings , where the strength of the roof would complicate the equation ) .
You 're talking about the protection afforded by a roof over one 's head .
I guess you could attempt to average the amount of time people spend outside , and assume that any roof will withstand any meteor strike ( or factor roof quality in , complicating things even further ) .
You do raise a good point , and it 's beyond me to elaborate further .
Should be implicit in the question .
We 're either interested in the probability being hit over a time period of the average life expectancy , or some arbitrary period , like 1 in x billion per year per capita .
Without specifying a timeframe the question would be void .
e.g. " What 's the chances of winning ( a given ) lottery ? " .
It would depend on whether you only play it exactly once , or whether you played it x number of times .
Risking being hit by a meteor is analogous buying a lottery ticket with an extreme probability of not-winning for every second of your life .
I say analogous , because I over-simplify the 'every second ' bit .
An extremely unfortunate person could be hit by two different meteorites in the same second .
But then , someone so unlucky would already have been killed by something else , right ; ) Again , not claiming any sort of authority here , maybe someone who IARS will be along soon to hand me my shiny metal ass on a plate , just engaging your point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANARS anyway, but to take issue with your points in order:

That's implicit in the measurement of previous strikes.
If we already know how many make it to the ground in a given time period, the amount that break up in the atmosphere and don't make it is irrelevant.
Wouldn't matter - assuming a uniform distribution of strikes across the planet (which probably isn't correct, but that's not the point here), your chances would not vary no matter where you went (ignoring buildings, where the strength of the roof would complicate the equation).
You're talking about the protection afforded by a roof over one's head.
I guess you could attempt to average the amount of time people spend outside, and assume that any roof will withstand any meteor strike (or factor roof quality in, complicating things even further).
You do raise a good point, and it's beyond me to elaborate further.
Should be implicit in the question.
We're either interested in the probability being hit over a time period of the average life expectancy, or some arbitrary period, like 1 in x billion per year per capita.
Without specifying a timeframe the question would be void.
e.g. "What's the chances of winning (a given) lottery?".
It would depend on whether you only play it exactly once, or whether you played it x number of times.
Risking being hit by a meteor is analogous buying a lottery ticket with an extreme probability of not-winning for every second of your life.
I say analogous, because I over-simplify the 'every second' bit.
An extremely unfortunate person could be hit by two different meteorites in the same second.
But then, someone so unlucky would already have been killed by something else, right ;)
Again, not claiming any sort of authority here, maybe someone who IARS will be along soon to hand me my shiny metal ass on a plate, just engaging your point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312423</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no frigging way that tiny thing made a foot wide hole in the ground or pierce through skin, no frigging way!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no frigging way that tiny thing made a foot wide hole in the ground or pierce through skin , no frigging way !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no frigging way that tiny thing made a foot wide hole in the ground or pierce through skin, no frigging way!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312129</id>
	<title>Not a likely story</title>
	<author>reginaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1244836800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is no way that a meteor would only scar the boy's hand, and then leave a 'foot sized crater' in the road.

The only alternative I can see is that the meteor bounced off the road and then hit the boy's hand, but that is equally as implausible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way that a meteor would only scar the boy 's hand , and then leave a 'foot sized crater ' in the road .
The only alternative I can see is that the meteor bounced off the road and then hit the boy 's hand , but that is equally as implausible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way that a meteor would only scar the boy's hand, and then leave a 'foot sized crater' in the road.
The only alternative I can see is that the meteor bounced off the road and then hit the boy's hand, but that is equally as implausible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314721</id>
	<title>Someone has to say it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244804040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Germany, you smite the meteors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Germany , you smite the meteors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Germany, you smite the meteors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313501</id>
	<title>I'm calling BS on this one.</title>
	<author>davidbrit2</author>
	<datestamp>1244798460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So let me get this straight: a meteor strikes a boy's hand, <i>bounces off</i>, and then impacts the ground with enough force to make a 1 ft crater in the ground, and a noise loud enough to leave his ears ringing for hours.</p><p>Somehow, I think any object with enough kinetic energy to do that kind of damage to the road would have completely obliterated a soft, fleshy hand, or at least blown clear through it. But just leaving a 3 inch scar and bouncing off, yet packing enough force to knock him to the ground? No way. Not unless this kid is Iron Man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this straight : a meteor strikes a boy 's hand , bounces off , and then impacts the ground with enough force to make a 1 ft crater in the ground , and a noise loud enough to leave his ears ringing for hours.Somehow , I think any object with enough kinetic energy to do that kind of damage to the road would have completely obliterated a soft , fleshy hand , or at least blown clear through it .
But just leaving a 3 inch scar and bouncing off , yet packing enough force to knock him to the ground ?
No way .
Not unless this kid is Iron Man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this straight: a meteor strikes a boy's hand, bounces off, and then impacts the ground with enough force to make a 1 ft crater in the ground, and a noise loud enough to leave his ears ringing for hours.Somehow, I think any object with enough kinetic energy to do that kind of damage to the road would have completely obliterated a soft, fleshy hand, or at least blown clear through it.
But just leaving a 3 inch scar and bouncing off, yet packing enough force to knock him to the ground?
No way.
Not unless this kid is Iron Man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317611</id>
	<title>Re:Watch out chilluns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244831580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe they'll end up like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0511123/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">the couple in this story</a> [imdb.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe they 'll end up like the couple in this story [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe they'll end up like the couple in this story [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316007</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Barny</author>
	<datestamp>1244813340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hrmm, accidental Pratchett quote or did you just finish reading Guards! Guards! as well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hrmm , accidental Pratchett quote or did you just finish reading Guards !
Guards ! as well : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hrmm, accidental Pratchett quote or did you just finish reading Guards!
Guards! as well :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895</id>
	<title>BWAHAHAHAHA BULLSHIT</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1244839440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pea-sized? That's about 9mm or even larger depending upon the cultivar. I've seen peas the size of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 caliber rounds (about 12.7mm) and at the 30,000mph in TFAHL that would not only rip the boy's hand off but probably break the bones up to his elbow from the shock. Even at 400mph it would do way more than that. Also, to be pea-sized and make a crater that large, it would have to have more mass than it should have since it's supposedly composed of primarily ferrous material.</p><p>And I doubt 30,000MPH. Maybe 250 at best.</p><p>But this *IS* the Telegraph. Not exactly a reliable source of news. I'm surprised this actually made it here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pea-sized ?
That 's about 9mm or even larger depending upon the cultivar .
I 've seen peas the size of .50 caliber rounds ( about 12.7mm ) and at the 30,000mph in TFAHL that would not only rip the boy 's hand off but probably break the bones up to his elbow from the shock .
Even at 400mph it would do way more than that .
Also , to be pea-sized and make a crater that large , it would have to have more mass than it should have since it 's supposedly composed of primarily ferrous material.And I doubt 30,000MPH .
Maybe 250 at best.But this * IS * the Telegraph .
Not exactly a reliable source of news .
I 'm surprised this actually made it here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pea-sized?
That's about 9mm or even larger depending upon the cultivar.
I've seen peas the size of .50 caliber rounds (about 12.7mm) and at the 30,000mph in TFAHL that would not only rip the boy's hand off but probably break the bones up to his elbow from the shock.
Even at 400mph it would do way more than that.
Also, to be pea-sized and make a crater that large, it would have to have more mass than it should have since it's supposedly composed of primarily ferrous material.And I doubt 30,000MPH.
Maybe 250 at best.But this *IS* the Telegraph.
Not exactly a reliable source of news.
I'm surprised this actually made it here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312059</id>
	<title>Very Very Valuable</title>
	<author>u8i9o0</author>
	<datestamp>1244836560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the meteorite marketplace, any that have hit a man-made object are significantly more valuable, given the rarity of such an occurrence.</p><p>A meteorite known to have hit a person would be even more so.</p><p>But anyone in such a position would be considered lucky if it doesn't kill them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the meteorite marketplace , any that have hit a man-made object are significantly more valuable , given the rarity of such an occurrence.A meteorite known to have hit a person would be even more so.But anyone in such a position would be considered lucky if it does n't kill them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the meteorite marketplace, any that have hit a man-made object are significantly more valuable, given the rarity of such an occurrence.A meteorite known to have hit a person would be even more so.But anyone in such a position would be considered lucky if it doesn't kill them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314461</id>
	<title>Re:Red flags</title>
	<author>ChrisLambrou</author>
	<datestamp>1244802780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Terminal velocity is somewhat of a red-herring here. If you were to drop a meteorite from a standing start from a high enough point (lets say you're in a hot air balloon), then terminal velocity is the asymptotic speed that the meteorite would approach as the acceleration due to gravity is cancelled out by air-resistance. But an actual meteorite doesn't hit the ground from a standing start. It could have been travelling at many times the speed of sound when it entered the atmosphere. Sure, its trip through the atmosphere would have slowed it down a little, but there's no guarantee that it would have dropped to terminal velocity before striking the ground.

I'm sure there are plenty of examples of meteorites leaving impact craters that are many times their size. I'm no expert, but I presume that they would also have had to have been travelling faster than terminal velocity in order to leave such marks on the ground. (Hmm, it's late - anyone know what tense I used in my last sentence? I sure don't!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Terminal velocity is somewhat of a red-herring here .
If you were to drop a meteorite from a standing start from a high enough point ( lets say you 're in a hot air balloon ) , then terminal velocity is the asymptotic speed that the meteorite would approach as the acceleration due to gravity is cancelled out by air-resistance .
But an actual meteorite does n't hit the ground from a standing start .
It could have been travelling at many times the speed of sound when it entered the atmosphere .
Sure , its trip through the atmosphere would have slowed it down a little , but there 's no guarantee that it would have dropped to terminal velocity before striking the ground .
I 'm sure there are plenty of examples of meteorites leaving impact craters that are many times their size .
I 'm no expert , but I presume that they would also have had to have been travelling faster than terminal velocity in order to leave such marks on the ground .
( Hmm , it 's late - anyone know what tense I used in my last sentence ?
I sure do n't !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terminal velocity is somewhat of a red-herring here.
If you were to drop a meteorite from a standing start from a high enough point (lets say you're in a hot air balloon), then terminal velocity is the asymptotic speed that the meteorite would approach as the acceleration due to gravity is cancelled out by air-resistance.
But an actual meteorite doesn't hit the ground from a standing start.
It could have been travelling at many times the speed of sound when it entered the atmosphere.
Sure, its trip through the atmosphere would have slowed it down a little, but there's no guarantee that it would have dropped to terminal velocity before striking the ground.
I'm sure there are plenty of examples of meteorites leaving impact craters that are many times their size.
I'm no expert, but I presume that they would also have had to have been travelling faster than terminal velocity in order to leave such marks on the ground.
(Hmm, it's late - anyone know what tense I used in my last sentence?
I sure don't!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312261</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>forkazoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244837280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>First, meteors aren't hot. Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand. It would tear through him like a shotgun slug. Was the kid's hand blown off? No? Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either. How about some photographs? Oh, there are none? Hmmm.</p></div></blockquote><p>The only way I can read this is that "foot wide crater" must mean something more like "hit a pile of dust and pebbles, and scattered things as far as a foot."  Then it starts to make more sense.  Still, AFAICT, this claim is unproven.  Which means that jumping through hoops in the reading may not be worth the effort.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , meteors are n't hot .
Second , if a " pea-sized piece of rock " is going fast enough to make " a foot wide crater in the ground , " it 's not going to be " bouncing off " shit , least of all this kid 's hand .
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug .
Was the kid 's hand blown off ?
No ? Then it did n't leave a fucking crater in the ground either .
How about some photographs ?
Oh , there are none ?
Hmmm.The only way I can read this is that " foot wide crater " must mean something more like " hit a pile of dust and pebbles , and scattered things as far as a foot .
" Then it starts to make more sense .
Still , AFAICT , this claim is unproven .
Which means that jumping through hoops in the reading may not be worth the effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, meteors aren't hot.
Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand.
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.
Was the kid's hand blown off?
No? Then it didn't leave a fucking crater in the ground either.
How about some photographs?
Oh, there are none?
Hmmm.The only way I can read this is that "foot wide crater" must mean something more like "hit a pile of dust and pebbles, and scattered things as far as a foot.
"  Then it starts to make more sense.
Still, AFAICT, this claim is unproven.
Which means that jumping through hoops in the reading may not be worth the effort.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313777</id>
	<title>Re:What is more...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244799480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He has a very Dutch sounding name. Perhaps he moved there from the Netherlands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He has a very Dutch sounding name .
Perhaps he moved there from the Netherlands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He has a very Dutch sounding name.
Perhaps he moved there from the Netherlands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833</id>
	<title>What kind of superpowers does he have now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is he like Magneto?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he like Magneto ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he like Magneto?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316773</id>
	<title>Meteor!</title>
	<author>catmistake</author>
	<datestamp>1244820300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't see any pointing out this technicality... but if it really hit him first before striking the ground, then he was struck by a meteor, not a meteorite...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't see any pointing out this technicality... but if it really hit him first before striking the ground , then he was struck by a meteor , not a meteorite.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't see any pointing out this technicality... but if it really hit him first before striking the ground, then he was struck by a meteor, not a meteorite...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313161</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1244797200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to check up on the DiskWorld series about million to one chances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to check up on the DiskWorld series about million to one chances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to check up on the DiskWorld series about million to one chances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313547</id>
	<title>now he SHOULD play the lottery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest playing the number 4 8 15 16 23 42.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest playing the number 4 8 15 16 23 42 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest playing the number 4 8 15 16 23 42.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316439</id>
	<title>What about the trajectory?</title>
	<author>tgrockhead</author>
	<datestamp>1244817180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wasn't there and I'm no ballistics/cosmology/neogeewhizalogy expert, so I can't speak for what really happened.  But it seems to me that the supposed hypervelocity pea could have created a crater and small blast to knock the kid over. No one said, or in my lazy skimming, I missed where anyone mentioned the initial trajectory possibilities.  An object entering perpendicular to the atmosphere would experience far less drag than an object entering at an oblique angle.    I think NASA knows a thing or two about that.

Is it simply that the 1950's meteor was an oblique angle trajectory while the smoting (had to use that word again) meteor was closer to perpendicular?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't there and I 'm no ballistics/cosmology/neogeewhizalogy expert , so I ca n't speak for what really happened .
But it seems to me that the supposed hypervelocity pea could have created a crater and small blast to knock the kid over .
No one said , or in my lazy skimming , I missed where anyone mentioned the initial trajectory possibilities .
An object entering perpendicular to the atmosphere would experience far less drag than an object entering at an oblique angle .
I think NASA knows a thing or two about that .
Is it simply that the 1950 's meteor was an oblique angle trajectory while the smoting ( had to use that word again ) meteor was closer to perpendicular ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't there and I'm no ballistics/cosmology/neogeewhizalogy expert, so I can't speak for what really happened.
But it seems to me that the supposed hypervelocity pea could have created a crater and small blast to knock the kid over.
No one said, or in my lazy skimming, I missed where anyone mentioned the initial trajectory possibilities.
An object entering perpendicular to the atmosphere would experience far less drag than an object entering at an oblique angle.
I think NASA knows a thing or two about that.
Is it simply that the 1950's meteor was an oblique angle trajectory while the smoting (had to use that word again) meteor was closer to perpendicular?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313521</id>
	<title>All I can say is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I can say is...</p><p>Totally cool real life superhero origin story!</p><p>Okay, I'll stop geeking out now.</p><p>--Pathway</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I can say is...Totally cool real life superhero origin story ! Okay , I 'll stop geeking out now.--Pathway</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I can say is...Totally cool real life superhero origin story!Okay, I'll stop geeking out now.--Pathway</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315873</id>
	<title>Re:Pic of hand, pea-meteorite and impact</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1244812080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like how they also include an actual photograph of the meteoroid traveling through space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how they also include an actual photograph of the meteoroid traveling through space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how they also include an actual photograph of the meteoroid traveling through space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</id>
	<title>quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244835780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"The teenager survived the strike, the chances of which are just 1 in a million - but with a nasty three-inch long scar on his hand."</i> <br> <br>

Wow, there was a 99.9999\% of it killing him!<br> <br>

Seriously, surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million?  Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The teenager survived the strike , the chances of which are just 1 in a million - but with a nasty three-inch long scar on his hand .
" Wow , there was a 99.9999 \ % of it killing him !
Seriously , surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million ?
Is n't it closer to one in a few billion , since there 's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The teenager survived the strike, the chances of which are just 1 in a million - but with a nasty three-inch long scar on his hand.
"  

Wow, there was a 99.9999\% of it killing him!
Seriously, surely the odds of being struck are much smaller than one in a million?
Isn't it closer to one in a few billion, since there's a population of 6 billion and only 2 occurrences?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317801</id>
	<title>Re:Bar conversations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244834220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Checkmate!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Checkmate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Checkmate!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857</id>
	<title>Re:ein minuten bitte</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1244839320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand. It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.</i></p><p>I responded to this question on dig and I have simple answer because the same thing happens with full metal jackets ammunition on soft targets.</p><p>First the idea that bullets or any objects that pierce flesh will cause blow back is <a href="http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/mpmain.html#glass" title="intuitor.com">false</a> [intuitor.com].</p><p>Secondly, the US forces in Mogadishu (you know Black Hawk down) discovered that the their current model of M16s had no stopping power on drug crazed militia men who felt no pain. Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting. The bullet would simply pass through the attacker without mushrooming or fragmenting and does not knock them down.</p><p>The AK-47 on the other hand does not have this problem and causes massive flesh damage as it not only mushrooms but also spirals through the human body.</p><p>You might have trouble punching through Kevlar though...</p><p>So if we assume that the meteor burnt off any material that would have "mushroomed" like a hallow point bullet it is safe to assume that it would have pierced the flesh and went on through at that high of a speed without affecting the surrounding hand.</p><p>Had it of course hit something harder than bone then it might have shattered and caused more damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Second , if a " pea-sized piece of rock " is going fast enough to make " a foot wide crater in the ground , " it 's not going to be " bouncing off " shit , least of all this kid 's hand .
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.I responded to this question on dig and I have simple answer because the same thing happens with full metal jackets ammunition on soft targets.First the idea that bullets or any objects that pierce flesh will cause blow back is false [ intuitor.com ] .Secondly , the US forces in Mogadishu ( you know Black Hawk down ) discovered that the their current model of M16s had no stopping power on drug crazed militia men who felt no pain .
Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting .
The bullet would simply pass through the attacker without mushrooming or fragmenting and does not knock them down.The AK-47 on the other hand does not have this problem and causes massive flesh damage as it not only mushrooms but also spirals through the human body.You might have trouble punching through Kevlar though...So if we assume that the meteor burnt off any material that would have " mushroomed " like a hallow point bullet it is safe to assume that it would have pierced the flesh and went on through at that high of a speed without affecting the surrounding hand.Had it of course hit something harder than bone then it might have shattered and caused more damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Second, if a "pea-sized piece of rock" is going fast enough to make "a foot wide crater in the ground," it's not going to be "bouncing off" shit, least of all this kid's hand.
It would tear through him like a shotgun slug.I responded to this question on dig and I have simple answer because the same thing happens with full metal jackets ammunition on soft targets.First the idea that bullets or any objects that pierce flesh will cause blow back is false [intuitor.com].Secondly, the US forces in Mogadishu (you know Black Hawk down) discovered that the their current model of M16s had no stopping power on drug crazed militia men who felt no pain.
Their bullets were designed to pierce armored targets and would basically go through the attackers without causing much to the attacker who kept fighting.
The bullet would simply pass through the attacker without mushrooming or fragmenting and does not knock them down.The AK-47 on the other hand does not have this problem and causes massive flesh damage as it not only mushrooms but also spirals through the human body.You might have trouble punching through Kevlar though...So if we assume that the meteor burnt off any material that would have "mushroomed" like a hallow point bullet it is safe to assume that it would have pierced the flesh and went on through at that high of a speed without affecting the surrounding hand.Had it of course hit something harder than bone then it might have shattered and caused more damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311867</id>
	<title>Getting smacked around by space rocks?</title>
	<author>Cathbadh</author>
	<datestamp>1244835900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly, this kid is all set to gain numerous super-powers from his encounter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , this kid is all set to gain numerous super-powers from his encounter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, this kid is all set to gain numerous super-powers from his encounter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312155</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1244836860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considerably less than that.  There have been no reported hits since the '50s.  There were fewer people back then, but still more than a billion.  So the per year chance of being hit by a meteorite must be more like 1 in a few hundred billion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considerably less than that .
There have been no reported hits since the '50s .
There were fewer people back then , but still more than a billion .
So the per year chance of being hit by a meteorite must be more like 1 in a few hundred billion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considerably less than that.
There have been no reported hits since the '50s.
There were fewer people back then, but still more than a billion.
So the per year chance of being hit by a meteorite must be more like 1 in a few hundred billion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314423</id>
	<title>Should make a good comic book origin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244802600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sounds like a good beginning to a comic book...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sounds like a good beginning to a comic book.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sounds like a good beginning to a comic book...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319031</id>
	<title>Not Meteor but a Black Hole Singularity Strike</title>
	<author>ImitationEnergy</author>
	<datestamp>1244898960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You guys need reading glasses. It was so small because it wasn't a meteor: it was <b>a nugget-sized black hole</b> that hit the boy =&gt; <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/12/1651244" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/12/1651244</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You guys need reading glasses .
It was so small because it was n't a meteor : it was a nugget-sized black hole that hit the boy = &gt; http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/06/12/1651244 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You guys need reading glasses.
It was so small because it wasn't a meteor: it was a nugget-sized black hole that hit the boy =&gt; http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/12/1651244 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315747</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1244811120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Size of a pea, made of metal, making a foot-wide crater.</p><p>OK, compare that to a 9MM handgun round. That won't make a foot wide crater (maybe in sand?), so this pea-sized object must have been moving much faster than a bullet. (problematic)</p><p>And we're expected to believe that such an object bounced off his hand before making that crater?</p><p>Bullshit. The story is wrong, or the reporter is wrong, or the translator is wrong. Something is wacky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Size of a pea , made of metal , making a foot-wide crater.OK , compare that to a 9MM handgun round .
That wo n't make a foot wide crater ( maybe in sand ?
) , so this pea-sized object must have been moving much faster than a bullet .
( problematic ) And we 're expected to believe that such an object bounced off his hand before making that crater ? Bullshit .
The story is wrong , or the reporter is wrong , or the translator is wrong .
Something is wacky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Size of a pea, made of metal, making a foot-wide crater.OK, compare that to a 9MM handgun round.
That won't make a foot wide crater (maybe in sand?
), so this pea-sized object must have been moving much faster than a bullet.
(problematic)And we're expected to believe that such an object bounced off his hand before making that crater?Bullshit.
The story is wrong, or the reporter is wrong, or the translator is wrong.
Something is wacky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313649</id>
	<title>Vengeance of the Gods</title>
	<author>afabbro</author>
	<datestamp>1244798940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm told on good authority that a few moments before he was struck by this meteorite, he said "EMACS is the best editor and may God strike me down if it isn't!"</p><p>Let us all take note.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm told on good authority that a few moments before he was struck by this meteorite , he said " EMACS is the best editor and may God strike me down if it is n't !
" Let us all take note .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm told on good authority that a few moments before he was struck by this meteorite, he said "EMACS is the best editor and may God strike me down if it isn't!
"Let us all take note.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315517</id>
	<title>Re:BWAHAHAHAHA BULLSHIT</title>
	<author>spydum</author>
	<datestamp>1244809440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm trying to figure out how he found the pea-sized rock that hit him. If it hit hard enough to leave a one-foot hole, how did it possibly survive? That rock would have smashed to pieces I would think. Why are there no photos of the impact crater?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm trying to figure out how he found the pea-sized rock that hit him .
If it hit hard enough to leave a one-foot hole , how did it possibly survive ?
That rock would have smashed to pieces I would think .
Why are there no photos of the impact crater ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm trying to figure out how he found the pea-sized rock that hit him.
If it hit hard enough to leave a one-foot hole, how did it possibly survive?
That rock would have smashed to pieces I would think.
Why are there no photos of the impact crater?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073</id>
	<title>More likely shrapnel</title>
	<author>rminsk</author>
	<datestamp>1244836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The injury was more likely from the debris kicked up from the impact of the meteor on the ground than the meteor directly striking him on the hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165</id>
	<title>Red flags</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ON<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;picture<br>No reference<br>A pea sized Meteorite wouldn't have been traveling fast enough to leave a " foot sized crater on the road. "</p><p>If something the size of a pea falling from space could leave a foot sized crater, then building would have a tough time of it becasue we are bombarded with things this size hitting the ground all the time.</p><p>Another example, shoot a bullet straight up* and when it falls and hits the ground it will be traveling about as fast as a meteorite.<br>Hell shot a bullet into the ground and you still wont have a foot sized crater, and that is traveling many, many, times vaster then the terminal velocity of the meteor</p><p>*don't shoot a bullet straight up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ON ; pictureNo referenceA pea sized Meteorite would n't have been traveling fast enough to leave a " foot sized crater on the road .
" If something the size of a pea falling from space could leave a foot sized crater , then building would have a tough time of it becasue we are bombarded with things this size hitting the ground all the time.Another example , shoot a bullet straight up * and when it falls and hits the ground it will be traveling about as fast as a meteorite.Hell shot a bullet into the ground and you still wont have a foot sized crater , and that is traveling many , many , times vaster then the terminal velocity of the meteor * do n't shoot a bullet straight up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ON ;pictureNo referenceA pea sized Meteorite wouldn't have been traveling fast enough to leave a " foot sized crater on the road.
"If something the size of a pea falling from space could leave a foot sized crater, then building would have a tough time of it becasue we are bombarded with things this size hitting the ground all the time.Another example, shoot a bullet straight up* and when it falls and hits the ground it will be traveling about as fast as a meteorite.Hell shot a bullet into the ground and you still wont have a foot sized crater, and that is traveling many, many, times vaster then the terminal velocity of the meteor*don't shoot a bullet straight up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28326069</id>
	<title>Re:Points for creativity</title>
	<author>Joebert</author>
	<datestamp>1244988780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Great story to tell your parents after you've burned yourself with the crack pipe.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Unless it's the hand you masturbate with and your parents are religious freaks.<br> <br>

"We tried to warn you Bobby, God doesn't like it when you touch yourself."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great story to tell your parents after you 've burned yourself with the crack pipe .
Unless it 's the hand you masturbate with and your parents are religious freaks .
" We tried to warn you Bobby , God does n't like it when you touch yourself .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great story to tell your parents after you've burned yourself with the crack pipe.
Unless it's the hand you masturbate with and your parents are religious freaks.
"We tried to warn you Bobby, God doesn't like it when you touch yourself.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315985</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244813160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read this not as his chances of being struck, but his chances of survival assuming he was hit.  It's ambiguous that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this not as his chances of being struck , but his chances of survival assuming he was hit .
It 's ambiguous that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this not as his chances of being struck, but his chances of survival assuming he was hit.
It's ambiguous that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313405</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't matter how many people there are. It's how many meteors reach the earth's surface, the total surface area of our little globe, and how much space on it you take up.</p><p>More people just means a higher chance that \_someone\_ will get hit. Doesn't affect your chances at all. Unless meteors are actively looking for someone to strike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter how many people there are .
It 's how many meteors reach the earth 's surface , the total surface area of our little globe , and how much space on it you take up.More people just means a higher chance that \ _someone \ _ will get hit .
Does n't affect your chances at all .
Unless meteors are actively looking for someone to strike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter how many people there are.
It's how many meteors reach the earth's surface, the total surface area of our little globe, and how much space on it you take up.More people just means a higher chance that \_someone\_ will get hit.
Doesn't affect your chances at all.
Unless meteors are actively looking for someone to strike.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313749</id>
	<title>Re:quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244799360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Off the top of my head I can think of at least a few more things what would need to be considered than the worlds population and the number of previous documented incidents. Among them are:</p><p>-The likelihood of a meteorite actually reaching ground level intact. (Most meteorites burn up in the atmosphere if I'm not mistaken.)<br>-The sheer number of possible strike locations. (Most people live on land, not at sea and the majority of the earth is covered by water.)<br>-Time of day. (Fewer people are out of doors during the night.)<br>-The period of time in which we're predicting the chances of an occurrence for.</p><p>Maybe a real statistician can tell me if I'm off to a good start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Off the top of my head I can think of at least a few more things what would need to be considered than the worlds population and the number of previous documented incidents .
Among them are : -The likelihood of a meteorite actually reaching ground level intact .
( Most meteorites burn up in the atmosphere if I 'm not mistaken .
) -The sheer number of possible strike locations .
( Most people live on land , not at sea and the majority of the earth is covered by water .
) -Time of day .
( Fewer people are out of doors during the night .
) -The period of time in which we 're predicting the chances of an occurrence for.Maybe a real statistician can tell me if I 'm off to a good start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Off the top of my head I can think of at least a few more things what would need to be considered than the worlds population and the number of previous documented incidents.
Among them are:-The likelihood of a meteorite actually reaching ground level intact.
(Most meteorites burn up in the atmosphere if I'm not mistaken.
)-The sheer number of possible strike locations.
(Most people live on land, not at sea and the majority of the earth is covered by water.
)-Time of day.
(Fewer people are out of doors during the night.
)-The period of time in which we're predicting the chances of an occurrence for.Maybe a real statistician can tell me if I'm off to a good start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313833
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28326069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28370933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_1651244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312059
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312555
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314663
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312385
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313521
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313547
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312767
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314555
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315287
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312507
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312747
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312681
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314483
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312809
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312491
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312857
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314551
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311825
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311969
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313871
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28318197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322093
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311867
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28322371
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312311
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315229
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28316007
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312273
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314165
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313749
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313405
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28311817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28326069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313007
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28321203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28313501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_1651244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28312097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28317801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28315657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28314043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28370933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_1651244.28319047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
