<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_12_0112244</id>
	<title>Could Betelgeuse Go Boom?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244816520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The answer is No.  In space, nobody can hear you scream. However, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17282-betelgeuse-the-incredible-shrinking-star.html">it might go supernova</a> in the near future, if it hasn't already. I wanna see that, even if it would permanently disfigure Orion.  Ka freaking bam!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The answer is No .
In space , nobody can hear you scream .
However , it might go supernova in the near future , if it has n't already .
I wan na see that , even if it would permanently disfigure Orion .
Ka freaking bam !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The answer is No.
In space, nobody can hear you scream.
However, it might go supernova in the near future, if it hasn't already.
I wanna see that, even if it would permanently disfigure Orion.
Ka freaking bam!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304547</id>
	<title>Gamma ray burst</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1244744040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From what I understand, a grb from less than 3500 light years away would destroy the ozone layer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I understand , a grb from less than 3500 light years away would destroy the ozone layer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I understand, a grb from less than 3500 light years away would destroy the ozone layer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305219</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1244797500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter</i></p><p>And if it weren't, we'd be in serious trouble anyway, as it's radius is around 1,000 solar radii == about 47AU == about 4 times the maximum distance between Earth and Jupiter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Admittedly , Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than JupiterAnd if it were n't , we 'd be in serious trouble anyway , as it 's radius is around 1,000 solar radii = = about 47AU = = about 4 times the maximum distance between Earth and Jupiter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than JupiterAnd if it weren't, we'd be in serious trouble anyway, as it's radius is around 1,000 solar radii == about 47AU == about 4 times the maximum distance between Earth and Jupiter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303575</id>
	<title>Betelgeuse Betelgeuse Betelgeuse</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1244734200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its showtime</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its showtime</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its showtime</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308393</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1244822280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate this feature, it has nothing to do on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is a site for nerds, and wow is way too mainstream to be define as a game for nerds. This kind of features can only attract pseudo-geeks who will whine about very non-game stories.</p><p>That, and my server is not in the list (Sinstralis - EU).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate this feature , it has nothing to do on / .
/. is a site for nerds , and wow is way too mainstream to be define as a game for nerds .
This kind of features can only attract pseudo-geeks who will whine about very non-game stories.That , and my server is not in the list ( Sinstralis - EU ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate this feature, it has nothing to do on /.
/. is a site for nerds, and wow is way too mainstream to be define as a game for nerds.
This kind of features can only attract pseudo-geeks who will whine about very non-game stories.That, and my server is not in the list (Sinstralis - EU).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304137</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1244738700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Does anyone else have any suggestions"
<br> <br>
1.Lay down on the floor and throw a tantrum.
<br> <br>
2.Start your own SlashNot site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Does anyone else have any suggestions " 1.Lay down on the floor and throw a tantrum .
2.Start your own SlashNot site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Does anyone else have any suggestions"
 
1.Lay down on the floor and throw a tantrum.
2.Start your own SlashNot site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304041</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>Xaoswolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244737620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, we better hope it happens during the day when the stars aren't out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , we better hope it happens during the day when the stars are n't out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, we better hope it happens during the day when the stars aren't out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304985</id>
	<title>I don't think the submitter read TFA</title>
	<author>kwerle</author>
	<datestamp>1244837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, I read the article.  It says that the star has been shrinking and mentions a few hypothesis.</p><p>None of them say anything about nova - super or otherwise.</p><p>Some of the comments on the article do.</p><p>Could we fire the editor?  Please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , I read the article .
It says that the star has been shrinking and mentions a few hypothesis.None of them say anything about nova - super or otherwise.Some of the comments on the article do.Could we fire the editor ?
Please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, I read the article.
It says that the star has been shrinking and mentions a few hypothesis.None of them say anything about nova - super or otherwise.Some of the comments on the article do.Could we fire the editor?
Please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Viadd</author>
	<datestamp>1244737020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter.  Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through, but there are a LOT of neutrinos: about 0.05 solar masses of them.</p><p>Furthermore, they are the first things that escape from the core (apart from gravitational waves) since they move at near-lightspeed and have very little chance of interacting with the envelope of the star.  The big flashy special effects are driven by the shockwave from the core reaching the surface, and that takes hours.  So if you <em>were</em> at the distance of Jupiter, you would have time to die from neutrino effects before the blast hit you.</p><p>Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter, and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists.  But both Jupiter and Betelgeuse are much closer than 99.9999999999999999999\% of the Universe, and much further away than everyone you've ever met, so the distance scales aren't that different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter .
Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through , but there are a LOT of neutrinos : about 0.05 solar masses of them.Furthermore , they are the first things that escape from the core ( apart from gravitational waves ) since they move at near-lightspeed and have very little chance of interacting with the envelope of the star .
The big flashy special effects are driven by the shockwave from the core reaching the surface , and that takes hours .
So if you were at the distance of Jupiter , you would have time to die from neutrino effects before the blast hit you.Admittedly , Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter , and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists .
But both Jupiter and Betelgeuse are much closer than 99.9999999999999999999 \ % of the Universe , and much further away than everyone you 've ever met , so the distance scales are n't that different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter.
Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through, but there are a LOT of neutrinos: about 0.05 solar masses of them.Furthermore, they are the first things that escape from the core (apart from gravitational waves) since they move at near-lightspeed and have very little chance of interacting with the envelope of the star.
The big flashy special effects are driven by the shockwave from the core reaching the surface, and that takes hours.
So if you were at the distance of Jupiter, you would have time to die from neutrino effects before the blast hit you.Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter, and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists.
But both Jupiter and Betelgeuse are much closer than 99.9999999999999999999\% of the Universe, and much further away than everyone you've ever met, so the distance scales aren't that different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305229</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter. Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through, but there are a LOT of neutrinos: about 0.05 solar masses of them.</i></p><p>You are correct (I would've said Saturn instead of Jupiter, but there is a bit of variation).  What is sad is that you only received a score 4 informative, while the person who posted incorrect information (that neutrinos wouldn't affect anything) got a 5.  So much for the benefit of moderation...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter .
Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through , but there are a LOT of neutrinos : about 0.05 solar masses of them.You are correct ( I would 've said Saturn instead of Jupiter , but there is a bit of variation ) .
What is sad is that you only received a score 4 informative , while the person who posted incorrect information ( that neutrinos would n't affect anything ) got a 5 .
So much for the benefit of moderation.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter.
Any given neutrino has very little chance of hitting interacting with normal density matter it passes through, but there are a LOT of neutrinos: about 0.05 solar masses of them.You are correct (I would've said Saturn instead of Jupiter, but there is a bit of variation).
What is sad is that you only received a score 4 informative, while the person who posted incorrect information (that neutrinos wouldn't affect anything) got a 5.
So much for the benefit of moderation...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304397</id>
	<title>640 lightyears away you say?</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1244741400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 light years?  That ought to be enough for anybody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 light years ?
That ought to be enough for anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 light years?
That ought to be enough for anybody.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310199</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1244829420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, TFA is at least an interesting read.<br> <br>I'd like to point out, however, that not <b>once</b> in the article are the words "supernova", "nova", "explode", "boom", etc. ever mentioned.  One sentence from the article reads as follows: <p><div class="quote"><p>This could be a sign of a long-term oscillation in its size or the star's first death knells.</p></div><p>after which the rest of the article goes on to discuss much less spectacular but no less interesting causes of the change in luminosity (pulsations, instabilities, a potato-shaped star that is turning such that the narrow axis is perpendicular to our line of sight, etc.).  <br> <br> A tad sensationalist of a headline for what is a perfectly cromulent NewScientist article.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , TFA is at least an interesting read .
I 'd like to point out , however , that not once in the article are the words " supernova " , " nova " , " explode " , " boom " , etc .
ever mentioned .
One sentence from the article reads as follows : This could be a sign of a long-term oscillation in its size or the star 's first death knells.after which the rest of the article goes on to discuss much less spectacular but no less interesting causes of the change in luminosity ( pulsations , instabilities , a potato-shaped star that is turning such that the narrow axis is perpendicular to our line of sight , etc. ) .
A tad sensationalist of a headline for what is a perfectly cromulent NewScientist article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, TFA is at least an interesting read.
I'd like to point out, however, that not once in the article are the words "supernova", "nova", "explode", "boom", etc.
ever mentioned.
One sentence from the article reads as follows: This could be a sign of a long-term oscillation in its size or the star's first death knells.after which the rest of the article goes on to discuss much less spectacular but no less interesting causes of the change in luminosity (pulsations, instabilities, a potato-shaped star that is turning such that the narrow axis is perpendicular to our line of sight, etc.).
A tad sensationalist of a headline for what is a perfectly cromulent NewScientist article.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304065</id>
	<title>New Sensationalist</title>
	<author>Charles Dodgeson</author>
	<datestamp>1244737980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody ought to go through back issues of the <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/" title="newscientist.com">New Sensationalist</a> [newscientist.com] and look at all of their predictions or reports of great inventions or processes "that will be commercialized in two or three years" to see what their track record is.  I wonder if they can live up to the standards set by astrologers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody ought to go through back issues of the New Sensationalist [ newscientist.com ] and look at all of their predictions or reports of great inventions or processes " that will be commercialized in two or three years " to see what their track record is .
I wonder if they can live up to the standards set by astrologers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody ought to go through back issues of the New Sensationalist [newscientist.com] and look at all of their predictions or reports of great inventions or processes "that will be commercialized in two or three years" to see what their track record is.
I wonder if they can live up to the standards set by astrologers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306225</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>muzicman</author>
	<datestamp>1244810160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That should be enough for anyone...

Sorry!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That should be enough for anyone.. . Sorry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should be enough for anyone...

Sorry!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304329</id>
	<title>I can't wait</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1244740560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never got to see a bright supernova but I do lament the loss of Orion. I chose Orion as part of my business name, and the logo even includes the three central stars:  Mintaka, Al Nilam and Al Nitak. Got to love the old Arabic names of things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never got to see a bright supernova but I do lament the loss of Orion .
I chose Orion as part of my business name , and the logo even includes the three central stars : Mintaka , Al Nilam and Al Nitak .
Got to love the old Arabic names of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never got to see a bright supernova but I do lament the loss of Orion.
I chose Orion as part of my business name, and the logo even includes the three central stars:  Mintaka, Al Nilam and Al Nitak.
Got to love the old Arabic names of things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304893</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that.</p></div><p>

(tinfoil hat on)<br>
It takes just a little logic to show that this is the natural result of any advertisement supported media.<br> <br>

First: consider who the customer is.  Traditionally, the customer is the person or entity who pays for goods and services.  In the case of advertising supported media, it is the advertisers who pay, so they are the customer.<br> <br>

Second: consider what the product being sold is.  The product being sold is that which the customers pay for.  The advertisers are not paying for the media content, they are paying for the viewers' or readers' attention.  Therefore, the audience of advertising supported media is actually the product, the media being offered is more akin to the capital used to create the product, such as machinery in a factory.<br> <br>

Third: Consider what the goals of the media providers should be.  The goal of any company is to increase revenue.  In a free market this is traditionally done by offering a product that balances high quality with low price.  Since the product is the attention of the audience, the goal will be to produce an audience that best fits the advertiser's needs.<br> <br>

Fourth: Consider what the advertiser's needs entail.  The advertiser wishes to purchase the attention of an audience that will be most likely to purchase goods and services based on the advertising.  Therefore, the best audience from the advertiser's perspective is a gullible audience.<br> <br>

Fifth: Consider how media companies could go about creating the ideal product.  Since the best product is a gullible audience, then the media companies would be best served by creating capital that attracts and retains a gullible audience, with the "ideal" scenario being that the media itself maintains the gullibility of the audience.  The advertiser pays media industry has a very unique position: Creating media that attracts and caters to gullible audiences is actually far cheaper to do than creating media that stimulates the viewers intellect.<br> <br>

Conclusion: Since the primary motive of most corporations, especially publicly traded ones, in a capitalist free market is and theoretically should be to increase profits, it follows logically that creating sensationalist poorly written tripe is actually the responsible course of action for advertiser supported media organizations to take.<br> <br>

(tinfoil hat off.)  Uhoh... It appears that my wearing of the <a href="http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/" title="mit.edu" rel="nofollow">tinfoil hat</a> [mit.edu] may be just what THEY want me to do... does that mean that my theory is what THEY want us to believe???</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that .
( tinfoil hat on ) It takes just a little logic to show that this is the natural result of any advertisement supported media .
First : consider who the customer is .
Traditionally , the customer is the person or entity who pays for goods and services .
In the case of advertising supported media , it is the advertisers who pay , so they are the customer .
Second : consider what the product being sold is .
The product being sold is that which the customers pay for .
The advertisers are not paying for the media content , they are paying for the viewers ' or readers ' attention .
Therefore , the audience of advertising supported media is actually the product , the media being offered is more akin to the capital used to create the product , such as machinery in a factory .
Third : Consider what the goals of the media providers should be .
The goal of any company is to increase revenue .
In a free market this is traditionally done by offering a product that balances high quality with low price .
Since the product is the attention of the audience , the goal will be to produce an audience that best fits the advertiser 's needs .
Fourth : Consider what the advertiser 's needs entail .
The advertiser wishes to purchase the attention of an audience that will be most likely to purchase goods and services based on the advertising .
Therefore , the best audience from the advertiser 's perspective is a gullible audience .
Fifth : Consider how media companies could go about creating the ideal product .
Since the best product is a gullible audience , then the media companies would be best served by creating capital that attracts and retains a gullible audience , with the " ideal " scenario being that the media itself maintains the gullibility of the audience .
The advertiser pays media industry has a very unique position : Creating media that attracts and caters to gullible audiences is actually far cheaper to do than creating media that stimulates the viewers intellect .
Conclusion : Since the primary motive of most corporations , especially publicly traded ones , in a capitalist free market is and theoretically should be to increase profits , it follows logically that creating sensationalist poorly written tripe is actually the responsible course of action for advertiser supported media organizations to take .
( tinfoil hat off .
) Uhoh... It appears that my wearing of the tinfoil hat [ mit.edu ] may be just what THEY want me to do... does that mean that my theory is what THEY want us to believe ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that.
(tinfoil hat on)
It takes just a little logic to show that this is the natural result of any advertisement supported media.
First: consider who the customer is.
Traditionally, the customer is the person or entity who pays for goods and services.
In the case of advertising supported media, it is the advertisers who pay, so they are the customer.
Second: consider what the product being sold is.
The product being sold is that which the customers pay for.
The advertisers are not paying for the media content, they are paying for the viewers' or readers' attention.
Therefore, the audience of advertising supported media is actually the product, the media being offered is more akin to the capital used to create the product, such as machinery in a factory.
Third: Consider what the goals of the media providers should be.
The goal of any company is to increase revenue.
In a free market this is traditionally done by offering a product that balances high quality with low price.
Since the product is the attention of the audience, the goal will be to produce an audience that best fits the advertiser's needs.
Fourth: Consider what the advertiser's needs entail.
The advertiser wishes to purchase the attention of an audience that will be most likely to purchase goods and services based on the advertising.
Therefore, the best audience from the advertiser's perspective is a gullible audience.
Fifth: Consider how media companies could go about creating the ideal product.
Since the best product is a gullible audience, then the media companies would be best served by creating capital that attracts and retains a gullible audience, with the "ideal" scenario being that the media itself maintains the gullibility of the audience.
The advertiser pays media industry has a very unique position: Creating media that attracts and caters to gullible audiences is actually far cheaper to do than creating media that stimulates the viewers intellect.
Conclusion: Since the primary motive of most corporations, especially publicly traded ones, in a capitalist free market is and theoretically should be to increase profits, it follows logically that creating sensationalist poorly written tripe is actually the responsible course of action for advertiser supported media organizations to take.
(tinfoil hat off.
)  Uhoh... It appears that my wearing of the tinfoil hat [mit.edu] may be just what THEY want me to do... does that mean that my theory is what THEY want us to believe??
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308601</id>
	<title>It wont matter</title>
	<author>up2ng</author>
	<datestamp>1244823060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever we see happened 600 years ago, so it may have happened already.
<br>Betelgeuse is 600 Light Years away</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever we see happened 600 years ago , so it may have happened already .
Betelgeuse is 600 Light Years away</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever we see happened 600 years ago, so it may have happened already.
Betelgeuse is 600 Light Years away</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307329</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1244817960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Star go boom! Big word scary! Chemicals are mean! Vroom vroom car!</p></div><p>Yes?  Yes?  Go on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Star go boom !
Big word scary !
Chemicals are mean !
Vroom vroom car ! Yes ?
Yes ? Go on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star go boom!
Big word scary!
Chemicals are mean!
Vroom vroom car!Yes?
Yes?  Go on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304089</id>
	<title>And boom goes the Betelgeuse</title>
	<author>FMZ</author>
	<datestamp>1244738220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nt</htmltext>
<tokenext>nt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307783</id>
	<title>distance</title>
	<author>kel-tor</author>
	<datestamp>1244820060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The distance to Betelgeuse is not known with precision but if this is assumed to be 640 light years- wikipedia</p><p>In 1369 AD there was still a star where betelgeuse is susposed to be, but it may go nova before Columbus heads of for Haiti in the next century (verb tense: future past imperfect).<br>Rigel is 700-900 light years away (years ago)<br>Epsilon Orionis 1300 ly<br>Gamma Orionis 250 ly</p><p>All are part of orions belt, and looking up at the sky I see them all at the same time, but its an illusion.  Like one of those pictures where perspective makes it look like a person is taller than a building, or holding up the moon.  Whatever happened to Betelgeuse in 1400 is shown in the same view of Orion next to an image of Gamma Orionis from 1759, and a picture of Epsilon Orionis from the 700's and without using photoshop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The distance to Betelgeuse is not known with precision but if this is assumed to be 640 light years- wikipediaIn 1369 AD there was still a star where betelgeuse is susposed to be , but it may go nova before Columbus heads of for Haiti in the next century ( verb tense : future past imperfect ) .Rigel is 700-900 light years away ( years ago ) Epsilon Orionis 1300 lyGamma Orionis 250 lyAll are part of orions belt , and looking up at the sky I see them all at the same time , but its an illusion .
Like one of those pictures where perspective makes it look like a person is taller than a building , or holding up the moon .
Whatever happened to Betelgeuse in 1400 is shown in the same view of Orion next to an image of Gamma Orionis from 1759 , and a picture of Epsilon Orionis from the 700 's and without using photoshop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The distance to Betelgeuse is not known with precision but if this is assumed to be 640 light years- wikipediaIn 1369 AD there was still a star where betelgeuse is susposed to be, but it may go nova before Columbus heads of for Haiti in the next century (verb tense: future past imperfect).Rigel is 700-900 light years away (years ago)Epsilon Orionis 1300 lyGamma Orionis 250 lyAll are part of orions belt, and looking up at the sky I see them all at the same time, but its an illusion.
Like one of those pictures where perspective makes it look like a person is taller than a building, or holding up the moon.
Whatever happened to Betelgeuse in 1400 is shown in the same view of Orion next to an image of Gamma Orionis from 1759, and a picture of Epsilon Orionis from the 700's and without using photoshop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304075</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1244738100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 light years should be enough for anyone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 light years should be enough for anyone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 light years should be enough for anyone</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304291</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>Schemat1c</author>
	<datestamp>1244740140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Betelgeuse , Betelgeuse , Betelgeuse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304221</id>
	<title>quivering ejecta</title>
	<author>epine</author>
	<datestamp>1244739420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's likely that sound can be detected in space with the use of laser microphones.  The sound won't be conducted through space, but that doesn't mean the ejecta isn't quivering, or that the quivering can't be neurologically assimilated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's likely that sound can be detected in space with the use of laser microphones .
The sound wo n't be conducted through space , but that does n't mean the ejecta is n't quivering , or that the quivering ca n't be neurologically assimilated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's likely that sound can be detected in space with the use of laser microphones.
The sound won't be conducted through space, but that doesn't mean the ejecta isn't quivering, or that the quivering can't be neurologically assimilated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303605</id>
	<title>Where's the kaboom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308103</id>
	<title>Who cares if it could</title>
	<author>sunking2</author>
	<datestamp>1244821140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real question is has it already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question is has it already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question is has it already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307611</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1244819400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well for one thing the star would actually go boom. Since a Supernova throws off a lot of it's mass it would no longer be in a vacuum and there would be shock wave and there would be a boom if you where close enough.<br>I have to admit that Slashdot does seem to be getting less geeky and political all the time. Pay to many stories that are clearly politics are being listed as News or other things. Helpful hint if the summary has the words Demarcate, Republican, Green Party, Congressman, or Congress woman in it then it is politics.<br>I think part of the problem is that Slashdot is hard to make money on. What precentage of users are running ad blocking? 80\% maybe?<br>So if the get more of the masses they will make more money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well for one thing the star would actually go boom .
Since a Supernova throws off a lot of it 's mass it would no longer be in a vacuum and there would be shock wave and there would be a boom if you where close enough.I have to admit that Slashdot does seem to be getting less geeky and political all the time .
Pay to many stories that are clearly politics are being listed as News or other things .
Helpful hint if the summary has the words Demarcate , Republican , Green Party , Congressman , or Congress woman in it then it is politics.I think part of the problem is that Slashdot is hard to make money on .
What precentage of users are running ad blocking ?
80 \ % maybe ? So if the get more of the masses they will make more money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well for one thing the star would actually go boom.
Since a Supernova throws off a lot of it's mass it would no longer be in a vacuum and there would be shock wave and there would be a boom if you where close enough.I have to admit that Slashdot does seem to be getting less geeky and political all the time.
Pay to many stories that are clearly politics are being listed as News or other things.
Helpful hint if the summary has the words Demarcate, Republican, Green Party, Congressman, or Congress woman in it then it is politics.I think part of the problem is that Slashdot is hard to make money on.
What precentage of users are running ad blocking?
80\% maybe?So if the get more of the masses they will make more money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305829</id>
	<title>Never ascribe to malice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244805960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom! Big word scary! Chemicals are mean! Vroom vroom car!) or 2) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that. That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked, adding new features that don't, and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it's worth.</p><p>Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information? It's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging', but lately it's just gotten noticibly worse.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/2308" title="quotedb.com" rel="nofollow">Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence.</a> [quotedb.com]</p><p>- Napolean Bonaparte</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1 ) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator ( Star go boom !
Big word scary !
Chemicals are mean !
Vroom vroom car !
) or 2 ) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that .
That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features ' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked , adding new features that do n't , and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it 's worth.Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information ?
It 's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging ' , but lately it 's just gotten noticibly worse .
Never ascribe to malice , that which can be explained by incompetence .
[ quotedb.com ] - Napolean Bonaparte</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom!
Big word scary!
Chemicals are mean!
Vroom vroom car!
) or 2) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that.
That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked, adding new features that don't, and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it's worth.Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information?
It's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging', but lately it's just gotten noticibly worse.
Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence.
[quotedb.com]- Napolean Bonaparte
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537</id>
	<title>Nova Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244733900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boom!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boom !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boom!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304427</id>
	<title>Near future?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1244741880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are speaking in galactic terms? How much it takes a star (of size/class/whatever) of Betelgeuse to go from whenever is now (from our point of view, at least), to supernova? This month? this year? this century? or the next millenium? All seems to be waiting to hit us tomorrow, and mankind could be extinct for long by when that star explodes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are speaking in galactic terms ?
How much it takes a star ( of size/class/whatever ) of Betelgeuse to go from whenever is now ( from our point of view , at least ) , to supernova ?
This month ?
this year ?
this century ?
or the next millenium ?
All seems to be waiting to hit us tomorrow , and mankind could be extinct for long by when that star explodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are speaking in galactic terms?
How much it takes a star (of size/class/whatever) of Betelgeuse to go from whenever is now (from our point of view, at least), to supernova?
This month?
this year?
this century?
or the next millenium?
All seems to be waiting to hit us tomorrow, and mankind could be extinct for long by when that star explodes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303687</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244735040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely, but it might be distant enough, hopefully.</p></div><p>But there aren't any aliens around. I wonder if they know something we don't? What we need is a ringworld with the rotation axis at 90 degrees to the direction of Betelgeuse.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely , but it might be distant enough , hopefully.But there are n't any aliens around .
I wonder if they know something we do n't ?
What we need is a ringworld with the rotation axis at 90 degrees to the direction of Betelgeuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely, but it might be distant enough, hopefully.But there aren't any aliens around.
I wonder if they know something we don't?
What we need is a ringworld with the rotation axis at 90 degrees to the direction of Betelgeuse.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28313645</id>
	<title>Orion's belt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be a shame if one of those stars on Orion's belt burned out, because Orion's pants would fall down!</p><p>-Fozzie Bear</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be a shame if one of those stars on Orion 's belt burned out , because Orion 's pants would fall down ! -Fozzie Bear</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be a shame if one of those stars on Orion's belt burned out, because Orion's pants would fall down!-Fozzie Bear</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304023</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1244737440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes.  A Neutrino is a zero without a rim.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
A Neutrino is a zero without a rim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
A Neutrino is a zero without a rim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308975</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244824800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom! Big word scary! Chemicals are mean! Vroom vroom car!)</p></div><p>Or maybe its just you getting too old for this kind of talk. Grandad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator ( Star go boom !
Big word scary !
Chemicals are mean !
Vroom vroom car !
) Or maybe its just you getting too old for this kind of talk .
Grandad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom!
Big word scary!
Chemicals are mean!
Vroom vroom car!
)Or maybe its just you getting too old for this kind of talk.
Grandad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308999</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244824860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 light years should be enough for anyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 light years should be enough for anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 light years should be enough for anyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>Spacezilla</author>
	<datestamp>1244839320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this insightful?</p><p>What you're saying today is:<br>"It definitely hasn't happened yet."<br>And tomorrow:<br>"It definitely hasn't happened yet."<br>And the day after, if we just happen to see it:<br>"It definitely happened 600 years ago."</p><p>It doesn't matter whether we have observed it or not, it might have happened already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this insightful ? What you 're saying today is : " It definitely has n't happened yet .
" And tomorrow : " It definitely has n't happened yet .
" And the day after , if we just happen to see it : " It definitely happened 600 years ago .
" It does n't matter whether we have observed it or not , it might have happened already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this insightful?What you're saying today is:"It definitely hasn't happened yet.
"And tomorrow:"It definitely hasn't happened yet.
"And the day after, if we just happen to see it:"It definitely happened 600 years ago.
"It doesn't matter whether we have observed it or not, it might have happened already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305199</id>
	<title>Re:Heart of Gold</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1244797200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Let's hope Zaphod or Ford weren't visiting relatives at the time.</i></p><p>600 years ago. We're probably just now seeing light from the <a href="http://www.hhgproject.org/entries/collapsinghrungdisaster.html" title="hhgproject.org">collapsing hrung disaster of Betelgeuse 7</a> [hhgproject.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope Zaphod or Ford were n't visiting relatives at the time.600 years ago .
We 're probably just now seeing light from the collapsing hrung disaster of Betelgeuse 7 [ hhgproject.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope Zaphod or Ford weren't visiting relatives at the time.600 years ago.
We're probably just now seeing light from the collapsing hrung disaster of Betelgeuse 7 [hhgproject.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304979</id>
	<title>It's a new look</title>
	<author>ScottBob</author>
	<datestamp>1244837280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Voodoo priest sprinkles dust on Beetle Juice's head, and it starts shrinking. "Whoa. WHOA. WHOOOOOOOA! Hey, it's a new look for me."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Voodoo priest sprinkles dust on Beetle Juice 's head , and it starts shrinking .
" Whoa. WHOA .
WHOOOOOOOA ! Hey , it 's a new look for me .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Voodoo priest sprinkles dust on Beetle Juice's head, and it starts shrinking.
"Whoa. WHOA.
WHOOOOOOOA! Hey, it's a new look for me.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579</id>
	<title>Yes</title>
	<author>MaskedSlacker</author>
	<datestamp>1244734260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The anonymous reader is wrong.  A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star, and a large amount of pressure waves.  There would be no sound, in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena, but they would still happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The anonymous reader is wrong .
A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star , and a large amount of pressure waves .
There would be no sound , in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena , but they would still happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The anonymous reader is wrong.
A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star, and a large amount of pressure waves.
There would be no sound, in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena, but they would still happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305251</id>
	<title>Boom!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Head shot!</p><p>*TOENGGG*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Head shot !
* TOENGGG *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Head shot!
*TOENGGG*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303825</id>
	<title>Obligitory Hitchhiker's reference</title>
	<author>gbarules2999</author>
	<datestamp>1244735820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Ford Prefect would have his home planet's neighbour explode, too? (He comes from a planet somewhere around Betelgeuse) Pity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Ford Prefect would have his home planet 's neighbour explode , too ?
( He comes from a planet somewhere around Betelgeuse ) Pity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Ford Prefect would have his home planet's neighbour explode, too?
(He comes from a planet somewhere around Betelgeuse) Pity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303721</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That is one heck of a summary. I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.



Is it THAT slow of a news day, or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter?</p></div><p>or you could just lighten up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one heck of a summary .
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days .
Is it THAT slow of a news day , or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter ? or you could just lighten up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one heck of a summary.
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.
Is it THAT slow of a news day, or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter?or you could just lighten up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305855</id>
	<title>Calculating God</title>
	<author>vix86</author>
	<datestamp>1244806140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*Obligatory Spoiler Warning*<br>
<br>
Upon reading the summary, I was immediately reminded of the book <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating\_God" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Calculating God</a> [wikipedia.org]. In it, the star Betelgeuse goes supernova and starts an end of the world scenario here on Earth. Where in, us and a few other alien races in the this sector of the Milky Way are saved by "god."</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Obligatory Spoiler Warning * Upon reading the summary , I was immediately reminded of the book Calculating God [ wikipedia.org ] .
In it , the star Betelgeuse goes supernova and starts an end of the world scenario here on Earth .
Where in , us and a few other alien races in the this sector of the Milky Way are saved by " god .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Obligatory Spoiler Warning*

Upon reading the summary, I was immediately reminded of the book Calculating God [wikipedia.org].
In it, the star Betelgeuse goes supernova and starts an end of the world scenario here on Earth.
Where in, us and a few other alien races in the this sector of the Milky Way are saved by "god.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</id>
	<title>New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>nesfreak64</author>
	<datestamp>1244734260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's 640 light years away (give or take).

Would the neutrinos affect us at all?  Is this another doomsday scenario?

I would imagine that it'd be hellishly bright in the night sky.

What does science say about it?  I'm rusty on my astronomy, but it'd be awesome to see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 640 light years away ( give or take ) .
Would the neutrinos affect us at all ?
Is this another doomsday scenario ?
I would imagine that it 'd be hellishly bright in the night sky .
What does science say about it ?
I 'm rusty on my astronomy , but it 'd be awesome to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 640 light years away (give or take).
Would the neutrinos affect us at all?
Is this another doomsday scenario?
I would imagine that it'd be hellishly bright in the night sky.
What does science say about it?
I'm rusty on my astronomy, but it'd be awesome to see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307549</id>
	<title>Beetle Juice (1988)</title>
	<author>myspace-cn</author>
	<datestamp>1244819040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was a dyslexic Beetle Juice going to go boom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was a dyslexic Beetle Juice going to go boom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was a dyslexic Beetle Juice going to go boom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312643</id>
	<title>Re:Probable cause?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Global warming.</p></div><p>I guess the SUVs went there at night...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Global warming.I guess the SUVs went there at night.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global warming.I guess the SUVs went there at night...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</id>
	<title>Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1244734200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is one heck of a summary. I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.<br> <br>

Is it THAT slow of a news day, or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one heck of a summary .
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days .
Is it THAT slow of a news day , or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one heck of a summary.
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.
Is it THAT slow of a news day, or could no one else possibly outdo this clown of a submitter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305807</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>krenshala</author>
	<datestamp>1244805600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, if nobody looks it will never go nova?  Hmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... now we just need to find a way to make sure nobody ever observes it so we can "save the earth"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , if nobody looks it will never go nova ?
Hmm ... now we just need to find a way to make sure nobody ever observes it so we can " save the earth " ... ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, if nobody looks it will never go nova?
Hmm ... now we just need to find a way to make sure nobody ever observes it so we can "save the earth" ... ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</id>
	<title>Relitivity</title>
	<author>vikstar</author>
	<datestamp>1244742420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, it might go supernova in the near future, if it hasn't already</p></div><p>It hasn't already, because we haven't seen it go boom yet. Even if it is half a millennium away in terms of light travel time, from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , it might go supernova in the near future , if it has n't alreadyIt has n't already , because we have n't seen it go boom yet .
Even if it is half a millennium away in terms of light travel time , from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, it might go supernova in the near future, if it hasn't alreadyIt hasn't already, because we haven't seen it go boom yet.
Even if it is half a millennium away in terms of light travel time, from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304393</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>mtm\_king</author>
	<datestamp>1244741400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My two bits on this thread is - there is nothing we can do about it - things change - especially the good things - IMO<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is still cool - but like I said - things change...

Love you guys (and that girl that was here once)</htmltext>
<tokenext>My two bits on this thread is - there is nothing we can do about it - things change - especially the good things - IMO / .
is still cool - but like I said - things change.. . Love you guys ( and that girl that was here once )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My two bits on this thread is - there is nothing we can do about it - things change - especially the good things - IMO /.
is still cool - but like I said - things change...

Love you guys (and that girl that was here once)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308559</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Cheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1244822940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would be bright, not a doomsday scenario:</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse#Betelgeuse.27s\_fate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be bright , not a doomsday scenario : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse # Betelgeuse.27s \ _fate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be bright, not a doomsday scenario:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse#Betelgeuse.27s\_fate</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306221</id>
	<title>Oblig Star Control</title>
	<author>improfane</author>
	<datestamp>1244810160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope not because the Syreen live there and you know, what's not to love about scantily clad blue space women?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope not because the Syreen live there and you know , what 's not to love about scantily clad blue space women ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope not because the Syreen live there and you know, what's not to love about scantily clad blue space women?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306785</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>powerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1244815020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</p></div></blockquote><p>There is always a Boom Tomorrow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Boom Today , Boom TomorrowThere is always a Boom Tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Boom Today, Boom TomorrowThere is always a Boom Tomorrow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305635</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>dgbrownnt</author>
	<datestamp>1244803560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You may want to cover your eyes and ears.  Some of us are going to leave your frame of reference for a moment, and do not wish accidentally reveal any spoilers...

<br> <br>Put differently, Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve is broadcast in Seattle three hours after it is recorded in New York.  You can deny that Dick Clark has yelled Happy New Year because, in your frame of reference, you have yet to observe this.  However, you would be wrong.  You are free to only acknowledge events that are observed from your frame of reference, but everyone else is also free to speculate as to what may have already happened from a different frame of reference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may want to cover your eyes and ears .
Some of us are going to leave your frame of reference for a moment , and do not wish accidentally reveal any spoilers.. . Put differently , Dick Clark 's New Year 's Rockin ' Eve is broadcast in Seattle three hours after it is recorded in New York .
You can deny that Dick Clark has yelled Happy New Year because , in your frame of reference , you have yet to observe this .
However , you would be wrong .
You are free to only acknowledge events that are observed from your frame of reference , but everyone else is also free to speculate as to what may have already happened from a different frame of reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may want to cover your eyes and ears.
Some of us are going to leave your frame of reference for a moment, and do not wish accidentally reveal any spoilers...

 Put differently, Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve is broadcast in Seattle three hours after it is recorded in New York.
You can deny that Dick Clark has yelled Happy New Year because, in your frame of reference, you have yet to observe this.
However, you would be wrong.
You are free to only acknowledge events that are observed from your frame of reference, but everyone else is also free to speculate as to what may have already happened from a different frame of reference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306521</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>JrOldPhart</author>
	<datestamp>1244813160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong mod: This is FUNNY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong mod : This is FUNNY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong mod: This is FUNNY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307907</id>
	<title>Hopefully :)</title>
	<author>ZeRu</author>
	<datestamp>1244820480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope it will, I want to see a supernova explosion within my lifetime. I suspect it would be even more spectacular than the supernova from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN\_1006" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">1006</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it will , I want to see a supernova explosion within my lifetime .
I suspect it would be even more spectacular than the supernova from 1006 [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it will, I want to see a supernova explosion within my lifetime.
I suspect it would be even more spectacular than the supernova from 1006 [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28313917</id>
	<title>Re:Insensitive Clod</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244800080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What if it happened to you're solar system.</p></div><p>No, you're solar system. What if it to, punk?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if it happened to you 're solar system.No , you 're solar system .
What if it to , punk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if it happened to you're solar system.No, you're solar system.
What if it to, punk?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303587</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304629</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1244745600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That is one heck of a summary. I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.</p></div><p>That's what you call your <i>executive</i> summary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one heck of a summary .
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.That 's what you call your executive summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one heck of a summary.
I really like how a line and a half of text is qualifying as a story these days.That's what you call your executive summary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303601</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For all of us so far its part of a sight that has never changed as much as the naked eye could tell, and yet to have it possibly change... it would be cool to see, but disappointing at the same time. What I'm wondering now is not how this will affect us, but how it would affect the potential life forms out in that area of the universe, if any at all... to someone or something out there is this the end of all life as they know it? the start of a new change if the ability to move civilizations has become a reality for them? or will this be just a dot in everyone's night sky that goes out, only to be recorded in history, but never having too much of an effect on anything major?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For all of us so far its part of a sight that has never changed as much as the naked eye could tell , and yet to have it possibly change... it would be cool to see , but disappointing at the same time .
What I 'm wondering now is not how this will affect us , but how it would affect the potential life forms out in that area of the universe , if any at all... to someone or something out there is this the end of all life as they know it ?
the start of a new change if the ability to move civilizations has become a reality for them ?
or will this be just a dot in everyone 's night sky that goes out , only to be recorded in history , but never having too much of an effect on anything major ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all of us so far its part of a sight that has never changed as much as the naked eye could tell, and yet to have it possibly change... it would be cool to see, but disappointing at the same time.
What I'm wondering now is not how this will affect us, but how it would affect the potential life forms out in that area of the universe, if any at all... to someone or something out there is this the end of all life as they know it?
the start of a new change if the ability to move civilizations has become a reality for them?
or will this be just a dot in everyone's night sky that goes out, only to be recorded in history, but never having too much of an effect on anything major?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305257</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe, but it's even hundreds of light years away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe , but it 's even hundreds of light years away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe, but it's even hundreds of light years away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306355</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Ginnungagap42</author>
	<datestamp>1244811720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Betelgeuse is approximately 50 dozen light years away. We should be fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Betelgeuse is approximately 50 dozen light years away .
We should be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Betelgeuse is approximately 50 dozen light years away.
We should be fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306341</id>
	<title>The Internet Meme is you!</title>
	<author>gadlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1244811600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Internet Meme of which you are referring is the meme of the wailing site member whining that this site or that site is going downhill - going to he'll in a handbasket or that the quality of submissions has fallen. - It's user submissions! Submit Brother!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet Meme of which you are referring is the meme of the wailing site member whining that this site or that site is going downhill - going to he 'll in a handbasket or that the quality of submissions has fallen .
- It 's user submissions !
Submit Brother !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet Meme of which you are referring is the meme of the wailing site member whining that this site or that site is going downhill - going to he'll in a handbasket or that the quality of submissions has fallen.
- It's user submissions!
Submit Brother!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304539</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Jedis are gonna feel this one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Jedis are gon na feel this one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Jedis are gonna feel this one...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</id>
	<title>No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244738220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's going to go boom, expect the signs of it to arrive in 2012 to coincide with other endings predicted for that year.  And expect this to be a total insult to the Egyptian Pharaohs who seemed to revere that star above just about all else.
<br> <br>
Are we really sure we're far enough away to be safe?  I've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's going to go boom , expect the signs of it to arrive in 2012 to coincide with other endings predicted for that year .
And expect this to be a total insult to the Egyptian Pharaohs who seemed to revere that star above just about all else .
Are we really sure we 're far enough away to be safe ?
I 've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's going to go boom, expect the signs of it to arrive in 2012 to coincide with other endings predicted for that year.
And expect this to be a total insult to the Egyptian Pharaohs who seemed to revere that star above just about all else.
Are we really sure we're far enough away to be safe?
I've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</id>
	<title>Probable cause?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Global warming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Global warming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global warming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom! Big word scary! Chemicals are mean! Vroom vroom car!) or 2) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that. That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked, adding new features that don't, and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it's worth.</p><p>Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information? It's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging', but lately it's just gotten noticibly worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1 ) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator ( Star go boom !
Big word scary !
Chemicals are mean !
Vroom vroom car !
) or 2 ) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that .
That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features ' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked , adding new features that do n't , and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it 's worth.Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information ?
It 's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging ' , but lately it 's just gotten noticibly worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the editors or owners of Slashdot are either 1) Trying to increase viewership by appealing to a lowest denominator (Star go boom!
Big word scary!
Chemicals are mean!
Vroom vroom car!
) or 2) Trying to deliberately weaken the readership for purposes I can only speculate that.
That second theory is bolstered by the clumsy rolling out of 'features' during the past few weeks - breaking things that once worked, adding new features that don't, and in general doing their best to make the site almost more trouble to read than it's worth.Does anyone else have any suggestions or inside information?
It's almost a meme now that 'Slashdot is self-sabotauging', but lately it's just gotten noticibly worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306127</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244808960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a plot for a good movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a plot for a good movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a plot for a good movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305431</id>
	<title>There would be sound</title>
	<author>abigsmurf</author>
	<datestamp>1244800380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For one thing, Space isn't a total vacuum, but explosions like this would send huge amounts of gas shooting out in every direction. When this gas hits something, you'd get the sound of the explosion through the vibrations.</p><p>You'd see the explosion, then, depending on the distance, a few minutes later when you get hit by the shockwave, you'd hear the sound. I've only ever seen one Scifi show/film which dealt with space explosions in this way; Starship Operators (they destroy a ship in a battle then get hit by the shockwave where they hear explosion and also the screams of all the people being killed in it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For one thing , Space is n't a total vacuum , but explosions like this would send huge amounts of gas shooting out in every direction .
When this gas hits something , you 'd get the sound of the explosion through the vibrations.You 'd see the explosion , then , depending on the distance , a few minutes later when you get hit by the shockwave , you 'd hear the sound .
I 've only ever seen one Scifi show/film which dealt with space explosions in this way ; Starship Operators ( they destroy a ship in a battle then get hit by the shockwave where they hear explosion and also the screams of all the people being killed in it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For one thing, Space isn't a total vacuum, but explosions like this would send huge amounts of gas shooting out in every direction.
When this gas hits something, you'd get the sound of the explosion through the vibrations.You'd see the explosion, then, depending on the distance, a few minutes later when you get hit by the shockwave, you'd hear the sound.
I've only ever seen one Scifi show/film which dealt with space explosions in this way; Starship Operators (they destroy a ship in a battle then get hit by the shockwave where they hear explosion and also the screams of all the people being killed in it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28490625</id>
	<title>Night sky?</title>
	<author>relaxinparadise</author>
	<datestamp>1246027980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being that it's relatively close, would it affect the night sky by making it bright as day for some time? Also, any guesses as to what color would it be?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being that it 's relatively close , would it affect the night sky by making it bright as day for some time ?
Also , any guesses as to what color would it be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being that it's relatively close, would it affect the night sky by making it bright as day for some time?
Also, any guesses as to what color would it be?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304067</id>
	<title>This isn't exactly news.</title>
	<author>AbsoluteXyro</author>
	<datestamp>1244737980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've known for some time now that Betelgeuse is a red supergiant, and we have also known that the red supergiant phase of a star's life only lasts roughly one million years, tops.  Being that Betelgeuse is a few million years old, we can deduce that it may be well into it's red supergiant phase, and given that it is 600 light-years away, it is possible that the star has already gone super-nova (type II) and the resulting light from the blast has not yet reached us.  Now I understand that the article is saying the star appears to be shrinking, however the star (like any red supergiant) has a history of expanding and contracting.  Per the article, it could be any number of things.  I really don't think it is anything to get worked up about.  Not that sensationalism isn't fun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've known for some time now that Betelgeuse is a red supergiant , and we have also known that the red supergiant phase of a star 's life only lasts roughly one million years , tops .
Being that Betelgeuse is a few million years old , we can deduce that it may be well into it 's red supergiant phase , and given that it is 600 light-years away , it is possible that the star has already gone super-nova ( type II ) and the resulting light from the blast has not yet reached us .
Now I understand that the article is saying the star appears to be shrinking , however the star ( like any red supergiant ) has a history of expanding and contracting .
Per the article , it could be any number of things .
I really do n't think it is anything to get worked up about .
Not that sensationalism is n't fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've known for some time now that Betelgeuse is a red supergiant, and we have also known that the red supergiant phase of a star's life only lasts roughly one million years, tops.
Being that Betelgeuse is a few million years old, we can deduce that it may be well into it's red supergiant phase, and given that it is 600 light-years away, it is possible that the star has already gone super-nova (type II) and the resulting light from the blast has not yet reached us.
Now I understand that the article is saying the star appears to be shrinking, however the star (like any red supergiant) has a history of expanding and contracting.
Per the article, it could be any number of things.
I really don't think it is anything to get worked up about.
Not that sensationalism isn't fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305309</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1244798580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter, and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists.</p></div><p>So... what is the excitation energy of an astrophysicist and how do they manage to couple so strongly with neutrinos?</p><p>I suppose the leading theory might be to have them somehow emanate a variant Weak Force, which would make them be not really of this universe. Going by the few I've met - who were tending to be at least not of this world - the evidence seems to be stacking up...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Admittedly , Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter , and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists.So... what is the excitation energy of an astrophysicist and how do they manage to couple so strongly with neutrinos ? I suppose the leading theory might be to have them somehow emanate a variant Weak Force , which would make them be not really of this universe .
Going by the few I 've met - who were tending to be at least not of this world - the evidence seems to be stacking up.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Admittedly, Betelgeuse is somewhat further away than Jupiter, and the only neutrino effects are likely to be a lot of very excited astrophysicists.So... what is the excitation energy of an astrophysicist and how do they manage to couple so strongly with neutrinos?I suppose the leading theory might be to have them somehow emanate a variant Weak Force, which would make them be not really of this universe.
Going by the few I've met - who were tending to be at least not of this world - the evidence seems to be stacking up...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Show us your Warcraft main".</p><p>Your case is proven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Show us your Warcraft main " .Your case is proven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Show us your Warcraft main".Your case is proven.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304077</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>bogeuh</author>
	<datestamp>1244738100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>slashdot doesnt make stories, its just nerds linking to nerdy stories they StumbleUpon.

now they can summarise the story and link to it
or they can attempt a funny and link to it</htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdot doesnt make stories , its just nerds linking to nerdy stories they StumbleUpon .
now they can summarise the story and link to it or they can attempt a funny and link to it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdot doesnt make stories, its just nerds linking to nerdy stories they StumbleUpon.
now they can summarise the story and link to it
or they can attempt a funny and link to it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310733</id>
	<title>Re:What a show if it does...</title>
	<author>Cedric Tsui</author>
	<datestamp>1244831640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If it happened this month, most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated.  Any time from August through April, though, it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic.  And yes, I'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this.</p></div><p>I don't think you're grasping the timescales here. Article says:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Over a span of 15 years, the star's diameter seems to have declined from 11.2 to 9.6 AU</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it happened this month , most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated .
Any time from August through April , though , it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic .
And yes , I 'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this.I do n't think you 're grasping the timescales here .
Article says : Over a span of 15 years , the star 's diameter seems to have declined from 11.2 to 9.6 AU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it happened this month, most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated.
Any time from August through April, though, it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic.
And yes, I'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this.I don't think you're grasping the timescales here.
Article says:Over a span of 15 years, the star's diameter seems to have declined from 11.2 to 9.6 AU
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304913</id>
	<title>Re:Probable cause?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Manbearpig.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Manbearpig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Manbearpig.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309823</id>
	<title>Re:when it will happen</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1244827980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah, if Betelgeuse was going to supernova, it would have happened hundreds of years ago!</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah , if Betelgeuse was going to supernova , it would have happened hundreds of years ago ! - RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah, if Betelgeuse was going to supernova, it would have happened hundreds of years ago!- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307147</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1244816940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The anonymous reader is wrong.  A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star, and a large amount of pressure waves.  There would be no sound, in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena, but they would still happen.</p></div><p>So if a star explodes in the constellation and there's no women on Slashdot to hear about it, is the original poster still wrong?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The anonymous reader is wrong .
A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star , and a large amount of pressure waves .
There would be no sound , in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena , but they would still happen.So if a star explodes in the constellation and there 's no women on Slashdot to hear about it , is the original poster still wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The anonymous reader is wrong.
A supernova would be accompanied by a large amount of shockwaves through the star, and a large amount of pressure waves.
There would be no sound, in the sense that there would be no neurological interpretations of these phenomena, but they would still happen.So if a star explodes in the constellation and there's no women on Slashdot to hear about it, is the original poster still wrong?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307795</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't exactly news.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244820060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To answer your question, Yes, if it went supernova, we wouldn't know about it for 600 years. So if we see it blow up tomorrow, that means it happened 600 years ago. Talk about being behind the curve...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To answer your question , Yes , if it went supernova , we would n't know about it for 600 years .
So if we see it blow up tomorrow , that means it happened 600 years ago .
Talk about being behind the curve.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To answer your question, Yes, if it went supernova, we wouldn't know about it for 600 years.
So if we see it blow up tomorrow, that means it happened 600 years ago.
Talk about being behind the curve...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305097</id>
	<title>Re:Probable cause?</title>
	<author>Waccoon</author>
	<datestamp>1244839260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm... but isn't is a red giant?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm... but is n't is a red giant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm... but isn't is a red giant?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305419</id>
	<title>Don't Worry ...</title>
	<author>carlc75</author>
	<datestamp>1244800140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... its a love nebula! Plus, we're just the right distance<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>... its a love nebula !
Plus , we 're just the right distance ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... its a love nebula!
Plus, we're just the right distance ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>RsG</author>
	<datestamp>1244734800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Would the neutrinos affect us at all?  Is this another doomsday scenario?</p></div><p>Please, please tell me this was a joke.  Please tell me you actually understood what a neutrino is, and were intentionally posting something absurd.</p><p>In the off-chance you were serious, a neutrino doesn't interact with matter enough to do any damage.  This is not a matter of any uncertainty.  A single neutrino would have a chance of passing through several light years of solid lead without interacting with a single atom.  Neutrinos are sleeting through your body right now from the centre of the sun; they pass through the suns outer layers unimpeded, and if the sun isn't overhead wherever you are right now, then they've also passed through the innards of the earth.</p><p>Neutrinos can't affect us.  Or the earth, or much of anything, really.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would the neutrinos affect us at all ?
Is this another doomsday scenario ? Please , please tell me this was a joke .
Please tell me you actually understood what a neutrino is , and were intentionally posting something absurd.In the off-chance you were serious , a neutrino does n't interact with matter enough to do any damage .
This is not a matter of any uncertainty .
A single neutrino would have a chance of passing through several light years of solid lead without interacting with a single atom .
Neutrinos are sleeting through your body right now from the centre of the sun ; they pass through the suns outer layers unimpeded , and if the sun is n't overhead wherever you are right now , then they 've also passed through the innards of the earth.Neutrinos ca n't affect us .
Or the earth , or much of anything , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would the neutrinos affect us at all?
Is this another doomsday scenario?Please, please tell me this was a joke.
Please tell me you actually understood what a neutrino is, and were intentionally posting something absurd.In the off-chance you were serious, a neutrino doesn't interact with matter enough to do any damage.
This is not a matter of any uncertainty.
A single neutrino would have a chance of passing through several light years of solid lead without interacting with a single atom.
Neutrinos are sleeting through your body right now from the centre of the sun; they pass through the suns outer layers unimpeded, and if the sun isn't overhead wherever you are right now, then they've also passed through the innards of the earth.Neutrinos can't affect us.
Or the earth, or much of anything, really.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305817</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244805780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish I could mod this up. I think that popular science claiming that "things have already happened and it's just the light taking time to get to us" is a chief cause of people's misconceptions about space travel. If people understood even just that basic notion of relativity, that in addition to the light catching up to us, the instant of time when it explodes has also just caught up with us, since they travel together; then it would make a lot of relativity much more intuitive. People wouldn't think that we'll eventually discover an instantaneous form of communication that we could use to call Betelgeuse and ask how their star is "now", since there is no such thing as "now".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I could mod this up .
I think that popular science claiming that " things have already happened and it 's just the light taking time to get to us " is a chief cause of people 's misconceptions about space travel .
If people understood even just that basic notion of relativity , that in addition to the light catching up to us , the instant of time when it explodes has also just caught up with us , since they travel together ; then it would make a lot of relativity much more intuitive .
People would n't think that we 'll eventually discover an instantaneous form of communication that we could use to call Betelgeuse and ask how their star is " now " , since there is no such thing as " now " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I could mod this up.
I think that popular science claiming that "things have already happened and it's just the light taking time to get to us" is a chief cause of people's misconceptions about space travel.
If people understood even just that basic notion of relativity, that in addition to the light catching up to us, the instant of time when it explodes has also just caught up with us, since they travel together; then it would make a lot of relativity much more intuitive.
People wouldn't think that we'll eventually discover an instantaneous form of communication that we could use to call Betelgeuse and ask how their star is "now", since there is no such thing as "now".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305301</id>
	<title>Re:Oh no!</title>
	<author>PhetusPolice</author>
	<datestamp>1244798520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uhhh, have you ever seen a supernova??? They're a LOT prettier than just a star. Given, you won't see a twinkle in the sky, but with a telescope, you'd see something fantastic, even hundreds of years after it exploded</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhhh , have you ever seen a supernova ? ? ?
They 're a LOT prettier than just a star .
Given , you wo n't see a twinkle in the sky , but with a telescope , you 'd see something fantastic , even hundreds of years after it exploded</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhhh, have you ever seen a supernova???
They're a LOT prettier than just a star.
Given, you won't see a twinkle in the sky, but with a telescope, you'd see something fantastic, even hundreds of years after it exploded</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306535</id>
	<title>BAYXPLOSIONS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244813400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could be a great Michael Bay movie!</p><p>BA BLA BLOOOOOM!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be a great Michael Bay movie ! BA BLA BLOOOOOM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be a great Michael Bay movie!BA BLA BLOOOOOM!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303661</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>mark\_hill97</author>
	<datestamp>1244734860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will be bright enough to read by at night when it does go. The neutrinos may cause an increase in cancer rates, but humanity would survive just as we always have. Depending on how long it lasts we will likely see some climate change. But again, life will go on</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be bright enough to read by at night when it does go .
The neutrinos may cause an increase in cancer rates , but humanity would survive just as we always have .
Depending on how long it lasts we will likely see some climate change .
But again , life will go on</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be bright enough to read by at night when it does go.
The neutrinos may cause an increase in cancer rates, but humanity would survive just as we always have.
Depending on how long it lasts we will likely see some climate change.
But again, life will go on</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312051</id>
	<title>Is this how little we know about astrophysics?</title>
	<author>rbrander</author>
	<datestamp>1244836500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have thought, with all the decades of observations, all the heavy-duty models we have of stellar evolution, that there would soon (or already) be figures for:</p><p>* The odds of this being a mild variability vs the odds on it being a stellar collapse as it switches fuels to one further up the periodic table;</p><p>* If it is undergoing a collapse, the odds on it being the "Last collapse" when it's already burned down to iron.</p><p>Cumulating in some distinguished-looking talking head saying "unfortunately, it's only 3\% likely that we'll see it supernova in the next 50 years".  Or whatever the number is.</p><p>I mean, the whole *galaxy* (~2x10^13 cu.ly) supposedly only gets one of these shows every century, and we're just inside a sphere of 10^7 cu.ly in volume around Betelgeuse, that's one two-millionth of the galaxy.  The last Big One on record was the Crab Nebula (observed 1054 AD), ten times further away.  We probably miss half of them that are on the other side of the galactic centre.</p><p>What I'm saying is, the odds against us getting this good a show are, well...I won't say the "A" word.  So I don't want to get my hopes up.</p><p>Funny story, I read an article on supernovas once, which pointed out that if a star as close as mere dozens of ly were to blow, we'd all be fried.  It actually ended with "The perfect candidate would be the red giant Betelgeuse, 600 ly away, far enough to be completely safe, while close enough to put on a mind-boggling show bright enough to read by."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have thought , with all the decades of observations , all the heavy-duty models we have of stellar evolution , that there would soon ( or already ) be figures for : * The odds of this being a mild variability vs the odds on it being a stellar collapse as it switches fuels to one further up the periodic table ; * If it is undergoing a collapse , the odds on it being the " Last collapse " when it 's already burned down to iron.Cumulating in some distinguished-looking talking head saying " unfortunately , it 's only 3 \ % likely that we 'll see it supernova in the next 50 years " .
Or whatever the number is.I mean , the whole * galaxy * ( ~ 2x10 ^ 13 cu.ly ) supposedly only gets one of these shows every century , and we 're just inside a sphere of 10 ^ 7 cu.ly in volume around Betelgeuse , that 's one two-millionth of the galaxy .
The last Big One on record was the Crab Nebula ( observed 1054 AD ) , ten times further away .
We probably miss half of them that are on the other side of the galactic centre.What I 'm saying is , the odds against us getting this good a show are , well...I wo n't say the " A " word .
So I do n't want to get my hopes up.Funny story , I read an article on supernovas once , which pointed out that if a star as close as mere dozens of ly were to blow , we 'd all be fried .
It actually ended with " The perfect candidate would be the red giant Betelgeuse , 600 ly away , far enough to be completely safe , while close enough to put on a mind-boggling show bright enough to read by .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have thought, with all the decades of observations, all the heavy-duty models we have of stellar evolution, that there would soon (or already) be figures for:* The odds of this being a mild variability vs the odds on it being a stellar collapse as it switches fuels to one further up the periodic table;* If it is undergoing a collapse, the odds on it being the "Last collapse" when it's already burned down to iron.Cumulating in some distinguished-looking talking head saying "unfortunately, it's only 3\% likely that we'll see it supernova in the next 50 years".
Or whatever the number is.I mean, the whole *galaxy* (~2x10^13 cu.ly) supposedly only gets one of these shows every century, and we're just inside a sphere of 10^7 cu.ly in volume around Betelgeuse, that's one two-millionth of the galaxy.
The last Big One on record was the Crab Nebula (observed 1054 AD), ten times further away.
We probably miss half of them that are on the other side of the galactic centre.What I'm saying is, the odds against us getting this good a show are, well...I won't say the "A" word.
So I don't want to get my hopes up.Funny story, I read an article on supernovas once, which pointed out that if a star as close as mere dozens of ly were to blow, we'd all be fried.
It actually ended with "The perfect candidate would be the red giant Betelgeuse, 600 ly away, far enough to be completely safe, while close enough to put on a mind-boggling show bright enough to read by.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305167</id>
	<title>The great Hrung collapse</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1244839980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should have paid more attention to that hrung. What is a hrung anyway? And why does it have to collapse on Betelgeuse?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should have paid more attention to that hrung .
What is a hrung anyway ?
And why does it have to collapse on Betelgeuse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should have paid more attention to that hrung.
What is a hrung anyway?
And why does it have to collapse on Betelgeuse?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306659</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244814240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe, except this one is 640 lightyears away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe , except this one is 640 lightyears away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe, except this one is 640 lightyears away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306491</id>
	<title>Call me old fashioned ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244812980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I am interested in the ramifications in regards to astrology, specifically Egypt and the Pyramids. The end is near<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I am interested in the ramifications in regards to astrology , specifically Egypt and the Pyramids .
The end is near .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I am interested in the ramifications in regards to astrology, specifically Egypt and the Pyramids.
The end is near ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303771</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>shird</author>
	<datestamp>1244735520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 light years should be far enough for everybody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 light years should be far enough for everybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 light years should be far enough for everybody.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304059</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>iris-n</author>
	<datestamp>1244737800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are some jokes in the Hitchhiker's trilogy that are hard to get, but this one from the Restaurant took me the longest:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Did you know," interrupting the ghostly figure, fixing Zaphod with a stern look, "that Betelgeuse Five has developed a very slight eccentricy in its orbit?"</p><p>So DNA was just joking about the impeding nova, giving a clue in the disturbances it would cause in its planets' orbits.</p><p>Shit, I feel dumb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some jokes in the Hitchhiker 's trilogy that are hard to get , but this one from the Restaurant took me the longest :         " Did you know , " interrupting the ghostly figure , fixing Zaphod with a stern look , " that Betelgeuse Five has developed a very slight eccentricy in its orbit ?
" So DNA was just joking about the impeding nova , giving a clue in the disturbances it would cause in its planets ' orbits.Shit , I feel dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some jokes in the Hitchhiker's trilogy that are hard to get, but this one from the Restaurant took me the longest:
        "Did you know," interrupting the ghostly figure, fixing Zaphod with a stern look, "that Betelgeuse Five has developed a very slight eccentricy in its orbit?
"So DNA was just joking about the impeding nova, giving a clue in the disturbances it would cause in its planets' orbits.Shit, I feel dumb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303635</id>
	<title>Good, No one liked that movie anyway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good, No one liked that movie anyway.</p><p>"That's BeetleJuice not Betelgeuse you Anonymous Bastard!"</p><p>Oh, well I stand corrected.  Carry on. Nothing to see here.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good , No one liked that movie anyway .
" That 's BeetleJuice not Betelgeuse you Anonymous Bastard !
" Oh , well I stand corrected .
Carry on .
Nothing to see here .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good, No one liked that movie anyway.
"That's BeetleJuice not Betelgeuse you Anonymous Bastard!
"Oh, well I stand corrected.
Carry on.
Nothing to see here.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310241</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244829540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the Pharaohs, perhaps they knew something we didn't.</p><p>He who can destroy a thing (Earth), controls a thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the Pharaohs , perhaps they knew something we did n't.He who can destroy a thing ( Earth ) , controls a thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the Pharaohs, perhaps they knew something we didn't.He who can destroy a thing (Earth), controls a thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304633</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's nothing.  I read a study once that found everyone who has ever survived a tragic event has at a later date died.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's nothing .
I read a study once that found everyone who has ever survived a tragic event has at a later date died .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's nothing.
I read a study once that found everyone who has ever survived a tragic event has at a later date died.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309055</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244825100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I deal with the new Slashdot "features" by installing/writing Greasemonkey scripts to counter them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I deal with the new Slashdot " features " by installing/writing Greasemonkey scripts to counter them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I deal with the new Slashdot "features" by installing/writing Greasemonkey scripts to counter them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309249</id>
	<title>Re:Oh noes!</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1244826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mr. Potato Star?   Comes with attachments for hats, mustaches and gamma ray bursts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Potato Star ?
Comes with attachments for hats , mustaches and gamma ray bursts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Potato Star?
Comes with attachments for hats, mustaches and gamma ray bursts!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303609</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303587</id>
	<title>Insensitive Clod</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Things will DIE!!!!</p><p>What if it happened to you're solar system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Things will DIE ! ! !
! What if it happened to you 're solar system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Things will DIE!!!
!What if it happened to you're solar system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1244734680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When that happens we'll just have to say..Shit happens?<br> <br>

I just read a story today about a lady who missed the Air France flight that killed everyone on board and then today died in a car wreck.<br> <br>

I'm not ruling anything out anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When that happens we 'll just have to say..Shit happens ?
I just read a story today about a lady who missed the Air France flight that killed everyone on board and then today died in a car wreck .
I 'm not ruling anything out anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When that happens we'll just have to say..Shit happens?
I just read a story today about a lady who missed the Air France flight that killed everyone on board and then today died in a car wreck.
I'm not ruling anything out anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244800980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is Cowardon a new particle?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Cowardon a new particle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Cowardon a new particle?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310207</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>kindbud</author>
	<datestamp>1244829420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's 640 light years away (give or take). Would the neutrinos affect us at all?</i></p><p>I doubt it. 640 light years should be enough for anybody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 640 light years away ( give or take ) .
Would the neutrinos affect us at all ? I doubt it .
640 light years should be enough for anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 640 light years away (give or take).
Would the neutrinos affect us at all?I doubt it.
640 light years should be enough for anybody.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305017</id>
	<title>Way to go, Editors.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244838180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Headline:</b>  <i>Could Betelgeuse Go Boom?</i> <br>
<b>First line of summary:</b>  <i>The answer is No.</i> <br>
<br>
Seriously, why would I need to read beyond that first sentence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Headline : Could Betelgeuse Go Boom ?
First line of summary : The answer is No .
Seriously , why would I need to read beyond that first sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headline:  Could Betelgeuse Go Boom?
First line of summary:  The answer is No.
Seriously, why would I need to read beyond that first sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28339809</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245056820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your post:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth.</p></div><p>The wikipedia:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>a semiregular variable star located approximately 640 light-years away from Earth</p></div><p>and to further illustrate...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It is possible that Betelgeuse will become a supernova, which will be the brightest ever recorded, outshining the Moon in the night sky. Considering its size and age of 8.5 million years, old for its size class, it may explode within the next thousand years. Since its rotational axis is not toward the Earth, Betelgeuse's supernova would not cause a gamma ray burst in the direction of Earth large enough to damage its ecosystem, and also because of its 640 light years distance.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your post : I 've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth.The wikipedia : a semiregular variable star located approximately 640 light-years away from Earthand to further illustrate...It is possible that Betelgeuse will become a supernova , which will be the brightest ever recorded , outshining the Moon in the night sky .
Considering its size and age of 8.5 million years , old for its size class , it may explode within the next thousand years .
Since its rotational axis is not toward the Earth , Betelgeuse 's supernova would not cause a gamma ray burst in the direction of Earth large enough to damage its ecosystem , and also because of its 640 light years distance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your post:I've heard before that a supernova even dozens of lightyears away would be a very bad thing for Earth.The wikipedia:a semiregular variable star located approximately 640 light-years away from Earthand to further illustrate...It is possible that Betelgeuse will become a supernova, which will be the brightest ever recorded, outshining the Moon in the night sky.
Considering its size and age of 8.5 million years, old for its size class, it may explode within the next thousand years.
Since its rotational axis is not toward the Earth, Betelgeuse's supernova would not cause a gamma ray burst in the direction of Earth large enough to damage its ecosystem, and also because of its 640 light years distance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597</id>
	<title>Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely, but it might be distant enough, hopefully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely , but it might be distant enough , hopefully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The yield of such a gamma ray blast might x-ray and bake us pretty nicely, but it might be distant enough, hopefully.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304395</id>
	<title>Great Collapsing Hrung Disaster</title>
	<author>Antony T Curtis</author>
	<datestamp>1244741400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Douglas Adams recorded a brief history of this catastrophe... It is only now in the near future that the light will reach Earth and that we may observe with our antiquated electromagnetic telescopes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Douglas Adams recorded a brief history of this catastrophe... It is only now in the near future that the light will reach Earth and that we may observe with our antiquated electromagnetic telescopes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Douglas Adams recorded a brief history of this catastrophe... It is only now in the near future that the light will reach Earth and that we may observe with our antiquated electromagnetic telescopes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304847</id>
	<title>Wait a sec</title>
	<author>eclectro</author>
	<datestamp>1244748660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In your calculations you forgot the small factoid that it may be another thousand years before it goes supernova. It has brightened considerably in the past only to dim back down. It was Fox news (fair and balanced) that mentions it going supernova, not the paper presented at the meeting that merely states a 15\% shrinkage and nothing else.</p><p>So,you might would have to drag/dig yourself out of the ground to see the Betelgeuse supernova. And most zombies I know about are more interested in brains than astronomy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In your calculations you forgot the small factoid that it may be another thousand years before it goes supernova .
It has brightened considerably in the past only to dim back down .
It was Fox news ( fair and balanced ) that mentions it going supernova , not the paper presented at the meeting that merely states a 15 \ % shrinkage and nothing else.So,you might would have to drag/dig yourself out of the ground to see the Betelgeuse supernova .
And most zombies I know about are more interested in brains than astronomy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In your calculations you forgot the small factoid that it may be another thousand years before it goes supernova.
It has brightened considerably in the past only to dim back down.
It was Fox news (fair and balanced) that mentions it going supernova, not the paper presented at the meeting that merely states a 15\% shrinkage and nothing else.So,you might would have to drag/dig yourself out of the ground to see the Betelgeuse supernova.
And most zombies I know about are more interested in brains than astronomy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309099</id>
	<title>Tharg Is Snacking</title>
	<author>meehawl</author>
	<datestamp>1244825340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tharg\_the\_Mighty" title="wikipedia.org">Polystyrene no longer sufficient</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Polystyrene no longer sufficient [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Polystyrene no longer sufficient [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304821</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Guitarsenal</author>
	<datestamp>1244748060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Still at least 2X the IQ of DIGG, though...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still at least 2X the IQ of DIGG , though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still at least 2X the IQ of DIGG, though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307913</id>
	<title>How is novva formed?</title>
	<author>autophile</author>
	<datestamp>1244820480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is novva formed? How star get expladed?

</p><p>They need to do way instain journalists&gt; who kill thier starrs. becuse these starrs cant frigth back it was on the news this mroing a journalist in fox who had kill her three braincells . they are taking the three braincells back to new york too jon stewart to rest my pary are with the Orion who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is novva formed ?
How star get expladed ?
They need to do way instain journalists &gt; who kill thier starrs .
becuse these starrs cant frigth back it was on the news this mroing a journalist in fox who had kill her three braincells .
they are taking the three braincells back to new york too jon stewart to rest my pary are with the Orion who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is novva formed?
How star get expladed?
They need to do way instain journalists&gt; who kill thier starrs.
becuse these starrs cant frigth back it was on the news this mroing a journalist in fox who had kill her three braincells .
they are taking the three braincells back to new york too jon stewart to rest my pary are with the Orion who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073</id>
	<title>Oh no!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244738100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Betelgeuse is awesome and very, very pretty - I'd hate for it to turn into another colour or vanish altogether. Isn't there someone we could petition to stop this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Betelgeuse is awesome and very , very pretty - I 'd hate for it to turn into another colour or vanish altogether .
Is n't there someone we could petition to stop this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Betelgeuse is awesome and very, very pretty - I'd hate for it to turn into another colour or vanish altogether.
Isn't there someone we could petition to stop this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304179</id>
	<title>Hey!</title>
	<author>WSOGMM</author>
	<datestamp>1244739000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't Ford's planet already blown up or something?  Now his star system is going down the drain... that guy must have both the worst and best luck in a fictional universe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't Ford 's planet already blown up or something ?
Now his star system is going down the drain... that guy must have both the worst and best luck in a fictional universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't Ford's planet already blown up or something?
Now his star system is going down the drain... that guy must have both the worst and best luck in a fictional universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304165</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>s-orbital</author>
	<datestamp>1244738880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>640 light years ought to be enough for anyone!</htmltext>
<tokenext>640 light years ought to be enough for anyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 light years ought to be enough for anyone!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303947</id>
	<title>Heart of Gold</title>
	<author>Black Sabbath</author>
	<datestamp>1244736660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's hope Zaphod or Ford weren't visiting relatives at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope Zaphod or Ford were n't visiting relatives at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope Zaphod or Ford weren't visiting relatives at the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933</id>
	<title>What a show if it does...</title>
	<author>jeffb (2.718)</author>
	<datestamp>1244736540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...rippling bands across the ground from atmospheric turbulence, razor-sharp shadows everywhere, with prominent diffraction rings around the ones from faraway objects.  And a flaming rainbow streak, blue at the top, shading down through green to red, as it rises or sets in a clear sky.</p><p>If my calculations are right, it <b>won't</b> burn your eyes; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser, not nearly strong enough to be dangerous.  A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam, bright enough to see passing through the air, if only it were <i>dark</i> outside.  The Palomar reflector would collect closer to 2 watts, enough to start fires and such.</p><p>If it happened this month, most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated.  Any time from August through April, though, it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic.  And yes, I'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...rippling bands across the ground from atmospheric turbulence , razor-sharp shadows everywhere , with prominent diffraction rings around the ones from faraway objects .
And a flaming rainbow streak , blue at the top , shading down through green to red , as it rises or sets in a clear sky.If my calculations are right , it wo n't burn your eyes ; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser , not nearly strong enough to be dangerous .
A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam , bright enough to see passing through the air , if only it were dark outside .
The Palomar reflector would collect closer to 2 watts , enough to start fires and such.If it happened this month , most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated .
Any time from August through April , though , it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic .
And yes , I 'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...rippling bands across the ground from atmospheric turbulence, razor-sharp shadows everywhere, with prominent diffraction rings around the ones from faraway objects.
And a flaming rainbow streak, blue at the top, shading down through green to red, as it rises or sets in a clear sky.If my calculations are right, it won't burn your eyes; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser, not nearly strong enough to be dangerous.
A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam, bright enough to see passing through the air, if only it were dark outside.
The Palomar reflector would collect closer to 2 watts, enough to start fires and such.If it happened this month, most everybody north of the Antarctic Circle would be cruelly cheated.
Any time from August through April, though, it should be visible in the night sky from just about anywhere but that same Antarctic.
And yes, I'd be willing to drag myself out of bed pre-dawn for this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307711</id>
	<title>Show us!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244819760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Show us ur warcraft main's tits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Show us ur warcraft main 's tits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Show us ur warcraft main's tits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306333</id>
	<title>Re:Probable cause?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244811540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naw, it's Bush's fault...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naw , it 's Bush 's fault.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naw, it's Bush's fault...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28318677</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>bruthasj</author>
	<datestamp>1244892600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should move slashdot to twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should move slashdot to twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should move slashdot to twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305245</id>
	<title>i wished i could</title>
	<author>markringen</author>
	<datestamp>1244797800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i wished i could see our sun go supernova<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(
i mean once we are all gone, and we could say a final goodbye to this place.

when that day comes when i am long gone into dust, but that day i would be truly happy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P
as my molecules will always live on, i hope my molecules enjoy the ride<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D (what an absurd thing to say, but we are immortal trough our mortality).</htmltext>
<tokenext>i wished i could see our sun go supernova : ( i mean once we are all gone , and we could say a final goodbye to this place .
when that day comes when i am long gone into dust , but that day i would be truly happy : P as my molecules will always live on , i hope my molecules enjoy the ride : D ( what an absurd thing to say , but we are immortal trough our mortality ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i wished i could see our sun go supernova :(
i mean once we are all gone, and we could say a final goodbye to this place.
when that day comes when i am long gone into dust, but that day i would be truly happy :P
as my molecules will always live on, i hope my molecules enjoy the ride :D (what an absurd thing to say, but we are immortal trough our mortality).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304685</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>lordholm</author>
	<datestamp>1244746200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry about the neutrinos, I have foreseen this and will start selling a cream that you can smear on your skin. This cream will cancel all the negative effects that you will suffer from the huge amounts of neutrino radiation that will embed the Earth when the star goes supernova.</p><p>I happy that it will be sold at only $500 per jar, I would say a cheap price compared to the alternative of being exposed to huge amounts of neutrino radiation. Buy now, while the supplies last, better safe than sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry about the neutrinos , I have foreseen this and will start selling a cream that you can smear on your skin .
This cream will cancel all the negative effects that you will suffer from the huge amounts of neutrino radiation that will embed the Earth when the star goes supernova.I happy that it will be sold at only $ 500 per jar , I would say a cheap price compared to the alternative of being exposed to huge amounts of neutrino radiation .
Buy now , while the supplies last , better safe than sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry about the neutrinos, I have foreseen this and will start selling a cream that you can smear on your skin.
This cream will cancel all the negative effects that you will suffer from the huge amounts of neutrino radiation that will embed the Earth when the star goes supernova.I happy that it will be sold at only $500 per jar, I would say a cheap price compared to the alternative of being exposed to huge amounts of neutrino radiation.
Buy now, while the supplies last, better safe than sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304527</id>
	<title>Near future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[Betelgeuse] might go supernova in the near future</p></div><p>Might blow in the near future? Or might have blown a few million years ago and we could find out soon?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Betelgeuse ] might go supernova in the near futureMight blow in the near future ?
Or might have blown a few million years ago and we could find out soon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Betelgeuse] might go supernova in the near futureMight blow in the near future?
Or might have blown a few million years ago and we could find out soon?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306161</id>
	<title>How do we prepare?</title>
	<author>Pagey123</author>
	<datestamp>1244809320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one of those times where I am reminded that the vast amount of time and distance involved in any event like this make it most difficult to prepare for.  Assume for the sake of argument that we know some event like this could truly destroy the human race (or at the very least do something very malicious to the vast majority of us and our environment).  Now, how do we, as a species, go about preparing?  If the star has already exploded, we'll have no way of knowing until the light has traveled X number of light years.  Thus any preparations we might make could very well be in vain and terribly incomplete.  Also let us assume we had some way of knowing that the star had not yet exploded.  Do we begin the massive (and we'll assume expensive) task of putting some sort of elaborate emergency procedures in place?  Assuming we did, who's to say that in 600 years our descendants would be able to take advantage of such countermeasures?  Hell, they may have wiped themselves our 200 years earlier because they decided it was finally a good idea to start lobbing nukes at one another!  Just another remind (to me) that we're pretty small, insignificant dots floating around at the complete mercy of forces we are just beginning to understand and appreciate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of those times where I am reminded that the vast amount of time and distance involved in any event like this make it most difficult to prepare for .
Assume for the sake of argument that we know some event like this could truly destroy the human race ( or at the very least do something very malicious to the vast majority of us and our environment ) .
Now , how do we , as a species , go about preparing ?
If the star has already exploded , we 'll have no way of knowing until the light has traveled X number of light years .
Thus any preparations we might make could very well be in vain and terribly incomplete .
Also let us assume we had some way of knowing that the star had not yet exploded .
Do we begin the massive ( and we 'll assume expensive ) task of putting some sort of elaborate emergency procedures in place ?
Assuming we did , who 's to say that in 600 years our descendants would be able to take advantage of such countermeasures ?
Hell , they may have wiped themselves our 200 years earlier because they decided it was finally a good idea to start lobbing nukes at one another !
Just another remind ( to me ) that we 're pretty small , insignificant dots floating around at the complete mercy of forces we are just beginning to understand and appreciate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of those times where I am reminded that the vast amount of time and distance involved in any event like this make it most difficult to prepare for.
Assume for the sake of argument that we know some event like this could truly destroy the human race (or at the very least do something very malicious to the vast majority of us and our environment).
Now, how do we, as a species, go about preparing?
If the star has already exploded, we'll have no way of knowing until the light has traveled X number of light years.
Thus any preparations we might make could very well be in vain and terribly incomplete.
Also let us assume we had some way of knowing that the star had not yet exploded.
Do we begin the massive (and we'll assume expensive) task of putting some sort of elaborate emergency procedures in place?
Assuming we did, who's to say that in 600 years our descendants would be able to take advantage of such countermeasures?
Hell, they may have wiped themselves our 200 years earlier because they decided it was finally a good idea to start lobbing nukes at one another!
Just another remind (to me) that we're pretty small, insignificant dots floating around at the complete mercy of forces we are just beginning to understand and appreciate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28311925</id>
	<title>Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse, Betelgeuse...</title>
	<author>khelms</author>
	<datestamp>1244836140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's showtime!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's showtime !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's showtime!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303799</id>
	<title>Re:Poof</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In some countries the statement "Poof would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure" would suggest you liked to watch Gay Porn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In some countries the statement " Poof would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure " would suggest you liked to watch Gay Porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In some countries the statement "Poof would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure" would suggest you liked to watch Gay Porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555</id>
	<title>when it will happen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably gonna blow the next time Lydia yells Betelgeuse 3 times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably gon na blow the next time Lydia yells Betelgeuse 3 times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably gonna blow the next time Lydia yells Betelgeuse 3 times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309761</id>
	<title>According to J.J. Abrams....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244827800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are all doomed, since in the new Star Trek movie we learn that supernovas are capable of destroying the entire Milky Way galaxy and must be stopped by time traveling aliens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are all doomed , since in the new Star Trek movie we learn that supernovas are capable of destroying the entire Milky Way galaxy and must be stopped by time traveling aliens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are all doomed, since in the new Star Trek movie we learn that supernovas are capable of destroying the entire Milky Way galaxy and must be stopped by time traveling aliens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312705</id>
	<title>But I like Orion</title>
	<author>Tybalt\_Capulet</author>
	<datestamp>1244838780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, seriously, the Pyramids of Giza won't line up to anything anymore, neither will those Aztec ones, and that's not the only problem, the stars are cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , seriously , the Pyramids of Giza wo n't line up to anything anymore , neither will those Aztec ones , and that 's not the only problem , the stars are cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, seriously, the Pyramids of Giza won't line up to anything anymore, neither will those Aztec ones, and that's not the only problem, the stars are cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307117</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1244816880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it's a pseudo-particle which arises from quantizing cowardness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it 's a pseudo-particle which arises from quantizing cowardness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it's a pseudo-particle which arises from quantizing cowardness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304217</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>Nakor BlueRider</author>
	<datestamp>1244739360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Headshot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Headshot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headshot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305663</id>
	<title>Re:i wished i could</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244803980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our Sun is not massive enough to go Supernova.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Sun is not massive enough to go Supernova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Sun is not massive enough to go Supernova.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305245</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309211</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>tnk1</author>
	<datestamp>1244825820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.  In Relativity, there is only one time, and it is always Too Late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
In Relativity , there is only one time , and it is always Too Late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
In Relativity, there is only one time, and it is always Too Late.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303609</id>
	<title>Oh noes!</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1244734440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, sorry, not likely to be a in death throes, TFA states it is a potato shaped star that rotates every 18 years, thus it's likely an illusion.
<br> <br> Not big enough and close enough to be a hazard to us?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is it??</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , sorry , not likely to be a in death throes , TFA states it is a potato shaped star that rotates every 18 years , thus it 's likely an illusion .
Not big enough and close enough to be a hazard to us ?
... is it ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, sorry, not likely to be a in death throes, TFA states it is a potato shaped star that rotates every 18 years, thus it's likely an illusion.
Not big enough and close enough to be a hazard to us?
... is it?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307615</id>
	<title>For those that say sound can't travel in space:</title>
	<author>BigGar'</author>
	<datestamp>1244819400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It apparently can; if its low enough * &amp; loud enough:<br>
<a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/09sep\_blackholesounds.htm" title="nasa.gov">http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/09sep\_blackholesounds.htm</a> [nasa.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It apparently can ; if its low enough * &amp; loud enough : http : //science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/09sep \ _blackholesounds.htm [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It apparently can; if its low enough * &amp; loud enough:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/09sep\_blackholesounds.htm [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303679</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>GrpA</author>
	<datestamp>1244734980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More of note.</p><p>If it's 640 light years away, then it probably went boom 640 years ago.</p><p>Which only makes sense, since after all, 640 years should be enough for anyone.</p><p>GrpA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More of note.If it 's 640 light years away , then it probably went boom 640 years ago.Which only makes sense , since after all , 640 years should be enough for anyone.GrpA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More of note.If it's 640 light years away, then it probably went boom 640 years ago.Which only makes sense, since after all, 640 years should be enough for anyone.GrpA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304901</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1244749500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously - If it goes supernova we should be a bit worried because it's close enough to drown us with radiation.</p><p>If that happens all our petty bickering on this planet will seem insignificant.</p><p>Of course - it's not certain that the radiation will be strong enough to kill off all life, but things will probably change a lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously - If it goes supernova we should be a bit worried because it 's close enough to drown us with radiation.If that happens all our petty bickering on this planet will seem insignificant.Of course - it 's not certain that the radiation will be strong enough to kill off all life , but things will probably change a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously - If it goes supernova we should be a bit worried because it's close enough to drown us with radiation.If that happens all our petty bickering on this planet will seem insignificant.Of course - it's not certain that the radiation will be strong enough to kill off all life, but things will probably change a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305085</id>
	<title>Re:Aliens better shield us with something..</title>
	<author>PakProtector</author>
	<datestamp>1244839200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scrith would only block 40\% of the Neutrinos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scrith would only block 40 \ % of the Neutrinos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scrith would only block 40\% of the Neutrinos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304417</id>
	<title>Re:No Boom Today, Boom Tomorrow</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1244741760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fortunately Betelgeuse is more than dozens of lightyears away.</p><p>I'm hoping you were joking about 2012, but who modded your post interesting?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately Betelgeuse is more than dozens of lightyears away.I 'm hoping you were joking about 2012 , but who modded your post interesting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately Betelgeuse is more than dozens of lightyears away.I'm hoping you were joking about 2012, but who modded your post interesting?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304325</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Errtu76</author>
	<datestamp>1244740500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Continuing to be OT, why did the scrolling through comments become so horribly slow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Continuing to be OT , why did the scrolling through comments become so horribly slow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Continuing to be OT, why did the scrolling through comments become so horribly slow?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305793</id>
	<title>Could Slashdot Go Gaga?</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1244805540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The answer is No. In slashdot, nobody reads TFA. However, it might go gaga in the near future, if it hasn't already. I wanna see that, even if it would permanently disfigure the Internets. Ka freaking bla!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The answer is No .
In slashdot , nobody reads TFA .
However , it might go gaga in the near future , if it has n't already .
I wan na see that , even if it would permanently disfigure the Internets .
Ka freaking bla !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The answer is No.
In slashdot, nobody reads TFA.
However, it might go gaga in the near future, if it hasn't already.
I wanna see that, even if it would permanently disfigure the Internets.
Ka freaking bla!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304993</id>
	<title>Space Oddity</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1244837580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Townes and his team are excited because it gives a chance to look at a real supernova rockstar, or it's progression at least; if it happens at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Townes and his team are excited because it gives a chance to look at a real supernova rockstar , or it 's progression at least ; if it happens at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Townes and his team are excited because it gives a chance to look at a real supernova rockstar, or it's progression at least; if it happens at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303663</id>
	<title>Winona</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would not be impressed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would not be impressed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would not be impressed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305327</id>
	<title>Re:What a show if it does...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244798940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...If my calculations are right, it <b>won't</b> burn your eyes; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser, not nearly strong enough to be dangerous.  A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam, bright enough to see passing through the air, if only it were <i>dark</i> outside.</p></div><p>A show on the Discovery Channel tonight claimed that it would be bright enough for us to see during the day...no mention of any risks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...If my calculations are right , it wo n't burn your eyes ; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser , not nearly strong enough to be dangerous .
A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam , bright enough to see passing through the air , if only it were dark outside.A show on the Discovery Channel tonight claimed that it would be bright enough for us to see during the day...no mention of any risks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...If my calculations are right, it won't burn your eyes; it would be roughly equivalent to looking into a 4-microwatt laser, not nearly strong enough to be dangerous.
A 10-inch telescope could collimate it into a 5-mW beam, bright enough to see passing through the air, if only it were dark outside.A show on the Discovery Channel tonight claimed that it would be bright enough for us to see during the day...no mention of any risks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304027</id>
	<title>Nearby Supergiant stars</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1244737500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...are candidates</p><p>You get a lot of talk about how spectacular Eta Carinae would be if it went up. There's already been a Supernova "imposter" event...<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae</a> [wikipedia.org]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..and here's some analysis of whether it's a danger.<br><a href="http://stupendous.rit.edu/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt" title="rit.edu">http://stupendous.rit.edu/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt</a> [rit.edu]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...or has done so already<br><a href="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/246576/files/th-6805-93.ps.gz" title="cdsweb.cern.ch">http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/246576/files/th-6805-93.ps.gz</a> [cdsweb.cern.ch]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...are candidatesYou get a lot of talk about how spectacular Eta Carinae would be if it went up .
There 's already been a Supernova " imposter " event...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta \ _Carinae [ wikipedia.org ] ..and here 's some analysis of whether it 's a danger.http : //stupendous.rit.edu/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt [ rit.edu ] ...or has done so alreadyhttp : //cdsweb.cern.ch/record/246576/files/th-6805-93.ps.gz [ cdsweb.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...are candidatesYou get a lot of talk about how spectacular Eta Carinae would be if it went up.
There's already been a Supernova "imposter" event...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta\_Carinae [wikipedia.org] ..and here's some analysis of whether it's a danger.http://stupendous.rit.edu/richmond/answers/snrisks.txt [rit.edu] ...or has done so alreadyhttp://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/246576/files/th-6805-93.ps.gz [cdsweb.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306083</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1244808600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How is this insightful?</p><p>What you're saying today is:<br>"It definitely hasn't happened yet."<br>And tomorrow:<br>"It definitely hasn't happened yet."<br>And the day after, if we just happen to see it:<br>"It definitely happened 600 years ago."</p><p>It doesn't matter whether we have observed it or not, it might have happened already.</p></div><p>You might want to read a bit about light cones. An event is considered to have happened in a frame of reference when information regarding the event can reach that frame of reference. So if we see it go boom at 12:00 tomorrow, then in our frame of reference it went boom at 12:00 2009-06-13. Not 640 years ago, even though it took the information regarding the event that long to reach us.</p><p>Relativity is cool like that. It is \_not\_ intuitive!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this insightful ? What you 're saying today is : " It definitely has n't happened yet .
" And tomorrow : " It definitely has n't happened yet .
" And the day after , if we just happen to see it : " It definitely happened 600 years ago .
" It does n't matter whether we have observed it or not , it might have happened already.You might want to read a bit about light cones .
An event is considered to have happened in a frame of reference when information regarding the event can reach that frame of reference .
So if we see it go boom at 12 : 00 tomorrow , then in our frame of reference it went boom at 12 : 00 2009-06-13 .
Not 640 years ago , even though it took the information regarding the event that long to reach us.Relativity is cool like that .
It is \ _not \ _ intuitive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this insightful?What you're saying today is:"It definitely hasn't happened yet.
"And tomorrow:"It definitely hasn't happened yet.
"And the day after, if we just happen to see it:"It definitely happened 600 years ago.
"It doesn't matter whether we have observed it or not, it might have happened already.You might want to read a bit about light cones.
An event is considered to have happened in a frame of reference when information regarding the event can reach that frame of reference.
So if we see it go boom at 12:00 tomorrow, then in our frame of reference it went boom at 12:00 2009-06-13.
Not 640 years ago, even though it took the information regarding the event that long to reach us.Relativity is cool like that.
It is \_not\_ intuitive!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303559</id>
	<title>Permanent?</title>
	<author>Cor-cor</author>
	<datestamp>1244734080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How could it permanently disfigure Orion?  Can't you just say its name three times and have it pop right back?</p><p>Well, time to duck now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How could it permanently disfigure Orion ?
Ca n't you just say its name three times and have it pop right back ? Well , time to duck now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could it permanently disfigure Orion?
Can't you just say its name three times and have it pop right back?Well, time to duck now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304037</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 800 pixels wide it's 7 lines of text.</p><p>Not that it makes it any longer. And on a 30" it must be like half a line. Just saying...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 800 pixels wide it 's 7 lines of text.Not that it makes it any longer .
And on a 30 " it must be like half a line .
Just saying.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 800 pixels wide it's 7 lines of text.Not that it makes it any longer.
And on a 30" it must be like half a line.
Just saying...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308305</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Thoughts from Englan</author>
	<datestamp>1244821920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's 640 light years away (give or take).

Would the neutrinos affect us at all?  Is this another doomsday scenario?

I would imagine that it'd be hellishly bright in the night sky.

What does science say about it?  I'm rusty on my astronomy, but it'd be awesome to see.</p></div><p>meh - 640 light years ought to be enough for anyone</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 640 light years away ( give or take ) .
Would the neutrinos affect us at all ?
Is this another doomsday scenario ?
I would imagine that it 'd be hellishly bright in the night sky .
What does science say about it ?
I 'm rusty on my astronomy , but it 'd be awesome to see.meh - 640 light years ought to be enough for anyone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 640 light years away (give or take).
Would the neutrinos affect us at all?
Is this another doomsday scenario?
I would imagine that it'd be hellishly bright in the night sky.
What does science say about it?
I'm rusty on my astronomy, but it'd be awesome to see.meh - 640 light years ought to be enough for anyone
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308791</id>
	<title>Re:Nova Post!</title>
	<author>BUTT-H34D</author>
	<datestamp>1244823840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh huh.  You said 'hard on'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh huh .
You said 'hard on' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh huh.
You said 'hard on'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305255</id>
	<title>Re:New doomsday scenario?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter.</i> </p><p>I think if you're that close to a supernova, you've got much, much bigger problems than neutrinos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter .
I think if you 're that close to a supernova , you 've got much , much bigger problems than neutrinos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The neutrinos from a core collapse supernova would be lethal to humans at the distance of Jupiter.
I think if you're that close to a supernova, you've got much, much bigger problems than neutrinos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303637</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244734680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The question for me is <b>how long does the bad stuff last?</b>. If the answer if less than 12 hours then I will be hoping it happens just after Betelgeuse drops below the horizon at 144 degrees east.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question for me is how long does the bad stuff last ? .
If the answer if less than 12 hours then I will be hoping it happens just after Betelgeuse drops below the horizon at 144 degrees east .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question for me is how long does the bad stuff last?.
If the answer if less than 12 hours then I will be hoping it happens just after Betelgeuse drops below the horizon at 144 degrees east.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28314829</id>
	<title>Re:Oh no!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244804640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just join the "100.000 against destruction of Betelgeuse" group on Facebook, and we should all be fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just join the " 100.000 against destruction of Betelgeuse " group on Facebook , and we should all be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just join the "100.000 against destruction of Betelgeuse" group on Facebook, and we should all be fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312029</id>
	<title>Re:when it will happen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244836440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's probably gonna yell the next time Lydia blows Betelgeuse 3 times.</p></div><p>Fixed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably gon na yell the next time Lydia blows Betelgeuse 3 times.Fixed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably gonna yell the next time Lydia blows Betelgeuse 3 times.Fixed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303829</id>
	<title>Re:Probable cause?</title>
	<author>jmorris42</author>
	<datestamp>1244735820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, even the Gorebots wouldn't go there.... but we can be certain it is Bush's fault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , even the Gorebots would n't go there.... but we can be certain it is Bush 's fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, even the Gorebots wouldn't go there.... but we can be certain it is Bush's fault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305597</id>
	<title>Re:Relitivity</title>
	<author>junglee\_iitk</author>
	<datestamp>1244803020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to.</p></div></blockquote><p>What happens when we close our eyes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to.What happens when we close our eyes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... from our frame of reference it will only go boom when we observe it to.What happens when we close our eyes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304537</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Great Summary</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1244743860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The twitter generation is among us. Everything that can fit to print in 140 characters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The twitter generation is among us .
Everything that can fit to print in 140 characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The twitter generation is among us.
Everything that can fit to print in 140 characters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305341</id>
	<title>Re:when it will happen</title>
	<author>kyriosdelis</author>
	<datestamp>1244799120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's probably gonna blow the next time <b>Lydia</b> yells Betelgeuse 3 times.</p></div><p>Lydia the Tattooed Lady? <br> <br>
Oh Lydia, oh Lydia, say, have you met Lydia? <br>
Lydia the Tattooed Lady.<br>
She has eyes that folks adore so, and a torso even more so.<br>
Lydia, oh Lydia, that encyclopedia. <br>
Oh Lydia the queen of tattoo. On her back is The Battle of Waterloo.<br>
Beside it, The Wreck of the Hesperus, too. <br>
And proudly above waves the red, white, and blue.<br>
You can learn a lot from Lydia! <br>
La-la-la...la-la-la. La-la-la...la-la-la.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/ducks</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably gon na blow the next time Lydia yells Betelgeuse 3 times.Lydia the Tattooed Lady ?
Oh Lydia , oh Lydia , say , have you met Lydia ?
Lydia the Tattooed Lady .
She has eyes that folks adore so , and a torso even more so .
Lydia , oh Lydia , that encyclopedia .
Oh Lydia the queen of tattoo .
On her back is The Battle of Waterloo .
Beside it , The Wreck of the Hesperus , too .
And proudly above waves the red , white , and blue .
You can learn a lot from Lydia !
La-la-la...la-la-la. La-la-la...la-la-la .
/ducks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably gonna blow the next time Lydia yells Betelgeuse 3 times.Lydia the Tattooed Lady?
Oh Lydia, oh Lydia, say, have you met Lydia?
Lydia the Tattooed Lady.
She has eyes that folks adore so, and a torso even more so.
Lydia, oh Lydia, that encyclopedia.
Oh Lydia the queen of tattoo.
On her back is The Battle of Waterloo.
Beside it, The Wreck of the Hesperus, too.
And proudly above waves the red, white, and blue.
You can learn a lot from Lydia!
La-la-la...la-la-la. La-la-la...la-la-la.
/ducks
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303621</id>
	<title>Poof</title>
	<author>C18H27NO3 </author>
	<datestamp>1244734560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure.<br>
My understanding is that the axis on which it spins would not force any gamma rays towards Earth's direction so it would amount to a light show and the loss of a landmark star, without danger to us.<br>
A supernova that close would probably afford us a great deal of insight into things we aren't sure about hopefully in this generation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure .
My understanding is that the axis on which it spins would not force any gamma rays towards Earth 's direction so it would amount to a light show and the loss of a landmark star , without danger to us .
A supernova that close would probably afford us a great deal of insight into things we are n't sure about hopefully in this generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be a very interesting sight to see to be sure.
My understanding is that the axis on which it spins would not force any gamma rays towards Earth's direction so it would amount to a light show and the loss of a landmark star, without danger to us.
A supernova that close would probably afford us a great deal of insight into things we aren't sure about hopefully in this generation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28339809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303609
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28318677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28313917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28314829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_12_0112244_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28339809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305469
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306083
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303601
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28314829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309249
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303651
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303983
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305309
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305229
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305219
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303643
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305663
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28318677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303701
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304821
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308975
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304137
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304893
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305829
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303927
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307711
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28308393
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307611
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306341
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304393
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28307329
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28309055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303825
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28310733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303605
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28304913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28306333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28305097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28312643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_12_0112244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28303587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_12_0112244.28313917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
