<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_11_1349247</id>
	<title>Periodic Table Gets a New, Unnamed Element</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244731020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>koavf writes <i>"More than a decade after experiments first produced a single atom of 'super-heavy' element 112, a team of German scientists has been credited with its discovery, but it <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/2/hi/science/nature/8093374.stm">has yet to be named</a>. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has temporarily named the element ununbium, as 'ununbi' means 'one one two' in Latin; but the team now has the task of proposing its official name."</i>  Slashdotium?  Taconium?  Man, I shoulda gone into science so I could have named something sweet that kids have to memorize in classes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>koavf writes " More than a decade after experiments first produced a single atom of 'super-heavy ' element 112 , a team of German scientists has been credited with its discovery , but it has yet to be named .
The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has temporarily named the element ununbium , as 'ununbi ' means 'one one two ' in Latin ; but the team now has the task of proposing its official name .
" Slashdotium ?
Taconium ? Man , I shoulda gone into science so I could have named something sweet that kids have to memorize in classes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>koavf writes "More than a decade after experiments first produced a single atom of 'super-heavy' element 112, a team of German scientists has been credited with its discovery, but it has yet to be named.
The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry has temporarily named the element ununbium, as 'ununbi' means 'one one two' in Latin; but the team now has the task of proposing its official name.
"  Slashdotium?
Taconium?  Man, I shoulda gone into science so I could have named something sweet that kids have to memorize in classes.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294215</id>
	<title>Once the news reaches Harvard...</title>
	<author>W2IRT</author>
	<datestamp>1244736720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lehrerium!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lehrerium !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lehrerium!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300285</id>
	<title>Gentoo</title>
	<author>lannocc</author>
	<datestamp>1244714820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>In Europe, the general emergency call number is 112. I also like Gentoo.</i> </p><p>I like Gentoo as well, but I don't get the reference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Europe , the general emergency call number is 112 .
I also like Gentoo .
I like Gentoo as well , but I do n't get the reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> In Europe, the general emergency call number is 112.
I also like Gentoo.
I like Gentoo as well, but I don't get the reference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841</id>
	<title>Serious Question:  Why do Germans outperform?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a serious question.  Looking at the history of human technical achievement, why are Germans overrepresented among technical achievers?  The Germans produced the first car (beating Henry Ford to the punch), co-invented calculus (with an Englishman), developed part of the foundation of quantum physics, etc.
<p>
By contrast, I see almost nothing from any African state.  Africans contributed almost nothing to human technical achievement.
</p><p>
Does anyone know why the Germans outperform?  I define "German" to include "German Jews".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a serious question .
Looking at the history of human technical achievement , why are Germans overrepresented among technical achievers ?
The Germans produced the first car ( beating Henry Ford to the punch ) , co-invented calculus ( with an Englishman ) , developed part of the foundation of quantum physics , etc .
By contrast , I see almost nothing from any African state .
Africans contributed almost nothing to human technical achievement .
Does anyone know why the Germans outperform ?
I define " German " to include " German Jews " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a serious question.
Looking at the history of human technical achievement, why are Germans overrepresented among technical achievers?
The Germans produced the first car (beating Henry Ford to the punch), co-invented calculus (with an Englishman), developed part of the foundation of quantum physics, etc.
By contrast, I see almost nothing from any African state.
Africans contributed almost nothing to human technical achievement.
Does anyone know why the Germans outperform?
I define "German" to include "German Jews".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643</id>
	<title>It's so obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Colbertium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Colbertium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Colbertium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304497</id>
	<title>You've got . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . Constipatium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
Constipatium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
Constipatium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295715</id>
	<title>Re:assuming a trend</title>
	<author>revealingheart</author>
	<datestamp>1244742060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, 112 should be Additium. Then, 113 would be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy\_one\_get\_one\_free" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Bogofnium</a> [wikipedia.org], and 114 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nontotient" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Nontotientum</a> [wikipedia.org]!</p><p>(Who thought <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/114\_(number)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">114</a> [wikipedia.org] could be such a boring number? That'll keep the namers busy.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , 112 should be Additium .
Then , 113 would be Bogofnium [ wikipedia.org ] , and 114 Nontotientum [ wikipedia.org ] !
( Who thought 114 [ wikipedia.org ] could be such a boring number ?
That 'll keep the namers busy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, 112 should be Additium.
Then, 113 would be Bogofnium [wikipedia.org], and 114 Nontotientum [wikipedia.org]!
(Who thought 114 [wikipedia.org] could be such a boring number?
That'll keep the namers busy.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294315</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1244737200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Technetium, element 43, has no stable isotopes. Do you want to forbid people from referring to it as an element? That would be kind of silly. Chemists can do reactions with technetium, form compounds with it, etc.
</p><p>
Or if you want to arbitrarily pick some minimum half-life, what is that half-life going to be?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technetium , element 43 , has no stable isotopes .
Do you want to forbid people from referring to it as an element ?
That would be kind of silly .
Chemists can do reactions with technetium , form compounds with it , etc .
Or if you want to arbitrarily pick some minimum half-life , what is that half-life going to be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Technetium, element 43, has no stable isotopes.
Do you want to forbid people from referring to it as an element?
That would be kind of silly.
Chemists can do reactions with technetium, form compounds with it, etc.
Or if you want to arbitrarily pick some minimum half-life, what is that half-life going to be?
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149</id>
	<title>I hate whoever renamed unununium</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1244736420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unununium was such an awesome name, why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium? What does that mean anyway? Does it mean it creates rodents?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unununium was such an awesome name , why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium ?
What does that mean anyway ?
Does it mean it creates rodents ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unununium was such an awesome name, why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium?
What does that mean anyway?
Does it mean it creates rodents?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294963</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>ricosalomar</author>
	<datestamp>1244739540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Algebra?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Algebra ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Algebra?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</id>
	<title>What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>bigdaisy</author>
	<datestamp>1244737440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apart from BEER, humanity itself, controlled fire, language (probably), sterilisation of food and water, the world's tallest building (a pyramid) until recently, the roots of most modern popular music genres, airmail (by homing pigeon), the pendulum, the tunnel boring machine, stone tools, knives, pigments, burial, housing, bread, plywood, cement, river boats, sutures, the aqueduct, candles, glass, the water clock, toothpaste, metal block printing, coffee, the astrolabe, the ventilator, explosive gunpowder, the cannon, handguns, cartridges, heart transplants, the CAT scanner,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>You mean, apart for all that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apart from BEER , humanity itself , controlled fire , language ( probably ) , sterilisation of food and water , the world 's tallest building ( a pyramid ) until recently , the roots of most modern popular music genres , airmail ( by homing pigeon ) , the pendulum , the tunnel boring machine , stone tools , knives , pigments , burial , housing , bread , plywood , cement , river boats , sutures , the aqueduct , candles , glass , the water clock , toothpaste , metal block printing , coffee , the astrolabe , the ventilator , explosive gunpowder , the cannon , handguns , cartridges , heart transplants , the CAT scanner , ....You mean , apart for all that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apart from BEER, humanity itself, controlled fire, language (probably), sterilisation of food and water, the world's tallest building (a pyramid) until recently, the roots of most modern popular music genres, airmail (by homing pigeon), the pendulum, the tunnel boring machine, stone tools, knives, pigments, burial, housing, bread, plywood, cement, river boats, sutures, the aqueduct, candles, glass, the water clock, toothpaste, metal block printing, coffee, the astrolabe, the ventilator, explosive gunpowder, the cannon, handguns, cartridges, heart transplants, the CAT scanner, ....You mean, apart for all that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302257</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244723520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brought Peace?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brought Peace ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brought Peace?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295375</id>
	<title>Chemistry Major</title>
	<author>Psychotic\_Wrath</author>
	<datestamp>1244740740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am a senior in chemistry. I have taken all the chemistry courses, including inorganic chemistry. With Inorganic chemistry the lowest elements on the periodic table e used were the 2nd row, occasionally a third row element. We by no means have to memorize them. I do know some teachers of gen. chem. that require students to memorize the first 16. Some may even want the first 36. Asking to memorize the entire periodic table is kind of crazy, since most of the higher elements nobody will ever use unless they decide to work for CERN or some other extremely specialized field of chemistry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a senior in chemistry .
I have taken all the chemistry courses , including inorganic chemistry .
With Inorganic chemistry the lowest elements on the periodic table e used were the 2nd row , occasionally a third row element .
We by no means have to memorize them .
I do know some teachers of gen. chem. that require students to memorize the first 16 .
Some may even want the first 36 .
Asking to memorize the entire periodic table is kind of crazy , since most of the higher elements nobody will ever use unless they decide to work for CERN or some other extremely specialized field of chemistry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a senior in chemistry.
I have taken all the chemistry courses, including inorganic chemistry.
With Inorganic chemistry the lowest elements on the periodic table e used were the 2nd row, occasionally a third row element.
We by no means have to memorize them.
I do know some teachers of gen. chem. that require students to memorize the first 16.
Some may even want the first 36.
Asking to memorize the entire periodic table is kind of crazy, since most of the higher elements nobody will ever use unless they decide to work for CERN or some other extremely specialized field of chemistry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304895</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Einstein was born in Ulm, which, at the time of his birth, was in Germany.</p><p>Hitler was from Austria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Einstein was born in Ulm , which , at the time of his birth , was in Germany.Hitler was from Austria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Einstein was born in Ulm, which, at the time of his birth, was in Germany.Hitler was from Austria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300931</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>RancidPeanutOil</author>
	<datestamp>1244717160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think he means, what have they done for us <em>lately</em> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he means , what have they done for us lately</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he means, what have they done for us lately </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303167</id>
	<title>Re:Just give up</title>
	<author>Beerdood</author>
	<datestamp>1244730240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too long.  Maybe something shorter and catchier, like McElement.

Would also consider Cokium or Walmartium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too long .
Maybe something shorter and catchier , like McElement .
Would also consider Cokium or Walmartium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too long.
Maybe something shorter and catchier, like McElement.
Would also consider Cokium or Walmartium</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294493</id>
	<title>Missing Option!</title>
	<author>Fred.cpp</author>
	<datestamp>1244737800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>CowboyNealium (I'ts a heavy element, right?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>CowboyNealium ( I'ts a heavy element , right ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CowboyNealium (I'ts a heavy element, right?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305331</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1244799000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about....</p><p>Pedantium?</p><p>Or</p><p>Uselessinium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about....Pedantium ? OrUselessinium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about....Pedantium?OrUselessinium?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301237</id>
	<title>Asshatium</title>
	<author>n4djs</author>
	<datestamp>1244718300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since there isn't anything quite as dense as an asshat....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since there is n't anything quite as dense as an asshat... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since there isn't anything quite as dense as an asshat....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294503</id>
	<title>A Horrible suggestion...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wonderflonium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonderflonium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonderflonium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301781</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>XchristX</author>
	<datestamp>1244720760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't coffee from South America?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't coffee from South America ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't coffee from South America?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297015</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Brimmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244746620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who's to say that this element, that's not stable on our planet, be stable on another planet?  We know there are more elements but that haven't lasted long enough for us to classify them as elements.  I'm sure somewhere in the universe they exist in nature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's to say that this element , that 's not stable on our planet , be stable on another planet ?
We know there are more elements but that have n't lasted long enough for us to classify them as elements .
I 'm sure somewhere in the universe they exist in nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's to say that this element, that's not stable on our planet, be stable on another planet?
We know there are more elements but that haven't lasted long enough for us to classify them as elements.
I'm sure somewhere in the universe they exist in nature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298045</id>
	<title>Does this exist in the wild?</title>
	<author>Xaoswolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244750100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article states that they have made four atoms of this stuff.  Can you find it anywhere else?  Is it something that we would only find in the hearts of stars or deep in clouds of dark matter?  And if it only lasts for a few milliseconds, what can we do with it?<p> <i>But he is now setting his sights higher. "We tried the same experiment to get to element 120. We've not seen it yet, but we believe the element exists and, with a long enough beam time, it could be produced," he said.</i> </p><p>Exists where?  "Exists" and "we can make" are two different things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article states that they have made four atoms of this stuff .
Can you find it anywhere else ?
Is it something that we would only find in the hearts of stars or deep in clouds of dark matter ?
And if it only lasts for a few milliseconds , what can we do with it ?
But he is now setting his sights higher .
" We tried the same experiment to get to element 120 .
We 've not seen it yet , but we believe the element exists and , with a long enough beam time , it could be produced , " he said .
Exists where ?
" Exists " and " we can make " are two different things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article states that they have made four atoms of this stuff.
Can you find it anywhere else?
Is it something that we would only find in the hearts of stars or deep in clouds of dark matter?
And if it only lasts for a few milliseconds, what can we do with it?
But he is now setting his sights higher.
"We tried the same experiment to get to element 120.
We've not seen it yet, but we believe the element exists and, with a long enough beam time, it could be produced," he said.
Exists where?
"Exists" and "we can make" are two different things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294949</id>
	<title>Re:I hate whoever renamed unununium</title>
	<author>Nyvhek</author>
	<datestamp>1244739420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm\_Conrad\_R\%C3\%B6ntgen" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm\_Conrad\_R\%C3\%B6ntgen</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm \ _Conrad \ _R \ % C3 \ % B6ntgen [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm\_Conrad\_R\%C3\%B6ntgen [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294277</id>
	<title>ALL HAIL THE HYPNOTOAD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Name it Hypnotodium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Name it Hypnotodium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Name it Hypnotodium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296541</id>
	<title>We already have Helium, so...</title>
	<author>Plumber, Programmer,</author>
	<datestamp>1244745000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about Shelium?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Shelium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Shelium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299047</id>
	<title>Illuminotum</title>
	<author>Lepton68</author>
	<datestamp>1244753580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Illuminotum</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Illuminotum</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Illuminotum</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295097</id>
	<title>Since the Germans discovered it....</title>
	<author>macdaddy357</author>
	<datestamp>1244740020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Germans discovered it, so it will be called Nazium.

I keed! I keed!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Germans discovered it , so it will be called Nazium .
I keed !
I keed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germans discovered it, so it will be called Nazium.
I keed!
I keed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294107</id>
	<title>They flunked Latin...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bi" comes from "bis", which is Latin for "twice". "Un" by itself doesn't really mean anything, but can be used as a prefix as in "undeviginti", meaning nineteen. "One" is "unus", "una" or "unum", depending on the gender. I suppose "centesimusduodecimium" would be a bit too complicated? (from "centesimus duodecimus", meaning "the hundred and twelfth")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bi " comes from " bis " , which is Latin for " twice " .
" Un " by itself does n't really mean anything , but can be used as a prefix as in " undeviginti " , meaning nineteen .
" One " is " unus " , " una " or " unum " , depending on the gender .
I suppose " centesimusduodecimium " would be a bit too complicated ?
( from " centesimus duodecimus " , meaning " the hundred and twelfth " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bi" comes from "bis", which is Latin for "twice".
"Un" by itself doesn't really mean anything, but can be used as a prefix as in "undeviginti", meaning nineteen.
"One" is "unus", "una" or "unum", depending on the gender.
I suppose "centesimusduodecimium" would be a bit too complicated?
(from "centesimus duodecimus", meaning "the hundred and twelfth")</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294001</id>
	<title>all hail....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>hypnotoadium</htmltext>
<tokenext>hypnotoadium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hypnotoadium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</id>
	<title>So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1244741280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your list of German achievements is not really that impressive in the scope of history.  Lets break it down:<br> <br>
  <b>The first car.</b>  I think a frenchman was actually the first, but the real innovation was Henry Ford's mass production assembly line, not the automobile itself.<br> <br>
  <b>Calculus.</b> Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway. Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians.  The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing (and innovative) with it.<br> <br>
  <b>Quantum physics.</b>  As you say 'developed part of the foundation.'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.  It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.  Einstein was from Austria by the way.<br> <br>
So all your examples are sort of 'me too' or 'i helped out' innovations.  You would be better off to look at the French (Curie, Pasteur, or even  Descartes).  Or the English (Darwin, Newton).  Or the Italians (Galileo, Marconi, etc.).  And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe (since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad).<br> <br>
And lets not forget the Americans.  There is no ethnic identity associated with being American, but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything.<br> <br>
So to bring it down to your level, what have the Germans really innovated, uniquely and on their own?  How to start (and loose) two world wars?  How to best gas Jewish people?<br> <br>  But seriously, the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology.  That can not be ignored.  But not more than many other nations.  They are about par for the course.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your list of German achievements is not really that impressive in the scope of history .
Lets break it down : The first car .
I think a frenchman was actually the first , but the real innovation was Henry Ford 's mass production assembly line , not the automobile itself .
Calculus. Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway .
Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians .
The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing ( and innovative ) with it .
Quantum physics .
As you say 'developed part of the foundation .
' Quantum theory developed gradually , with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places .
It was not like Einstein 's theory of relativity , which was a real breakthrough ( although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell ( an Englishman ) and other past theories .
Einstein was from Austria by the way .
So all your examples are sort of 'me too ' or 'i helped out ' innovations .
You would be better off to look at the French ( Curie , Pasteur , or even Descartes ) .
Or the English ( Darwin , Newton ) .
Or the Italians ( Galileo , Marconi , etc. ) .
And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe ( since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad ) .
And lets not forget the Americans .
There is no ethnic identity associated with being American , but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything .
So to bring it down to your level , what have the Germans really innovated , uniquely and on their own ?
How to start ( and loose ) two world wars ?
How to best gas Jewish people ?
But seriously , the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology .
That can not be ignored .
But not more than many other nations .
They are about par for the course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your list of German achievements is not really that impressive in the scope of history.
Lets break it down: 
  The first car.
I think a frenchman was actually the first, but the real innovation was Henry Ford's mass production assembly line, not the automobile itself.
Calculus. Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway.
Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians.
The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing (and innovative) with it.
Quantum physics.
As you say 'developed part of the foundation.
'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.
It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.
Einstein was from Austria by the way.
So all your examples are sort of 'me too' or 'i helped out' innovations.
You would be better off to look at the French (Curie, Pasteur, or even  Descartes).
Or the English (Darwin, Newton).
Or the Italians (Galileo, Marconi, etc.).
And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe (since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad).
And lets not forget the Americans.
There is no ethnic identity associated with being American, but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything.
So to bring it down to your level, what have the Germans really innovated, uniquely and on their own?
How to start (and loose) two world wars?
How to best gas Jewish people?
But seriously, the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology.
That can not be ignored.
But not more than many other nations.
They are about par for the course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295173</id>
	<title>time to use chinese symbols in western science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244740200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can fit a lot of information into a little space with chinese writing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can fit a lot of information into a little space with chinese writing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can fit a lot of information into a little space with chinese writing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297623</id>
	<title>Mcidasium</title>
	<author>Zorlon</author>
	<datestamp>1244748600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mcidasium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mcidasium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mcidasium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299871</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244713440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have nothing against Africa, but your post is full of lies.</p><blockquote><div><p>beer</p></div></blockquote><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_beer" title="wikipedia.org">earliest beer</a> [wikipedia.org] comes from Mesopotamia and Egypt (which doesn't count, as it's culturally part of the Middle East).</p><blockquote><div><p>world's tallest building</p></div></blockquote><p>Egypt doesn't count.</p><blockquote><div><p>the roots of most modern popular music genres</p></div></blockquote><p>Dubious at best. The truth is that we have no idea what music sounded like before <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical\_notation#History" title="wikipedia.org">accurate musical notation came into widespread use during the Middle Ages</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><blockquote><div><p>airmail (by homing pigeon)</p></div></blockquote><p>The use of homing pigeons for communication was invented by several civilizations independently.</p><blockquote><div><p>the pendulum</p></div></blockquote><p>The Chinese were the first to employ the pendulum, and Galileo Galilei was the first to study their properties mathematically.</p><blockquote><div><p>the tunnel boring machine</p></div></blockquote><p>Have a source for this one? It's rather difficult to create a tunnel boring machine without at least a steam engine.</p><blockquote><div><p>the aqueduct</p></div></blockquote><p>The Nile doesn't count.</p><blockquote><div><p>candles, glass, the water clock</p></div></blockquote><p>Again, Egypt doesn't count. Alexandria counts even less, given its Hellenic character.</p><blockquote><div><p>metal block printing</p></div></blockquote><p>Everyone knows Gutenberg invented movable type.</p><blockquote><div><p>the ventilator</p></div></blockquote><p>You mean bellows? Invented independently by every civilization that discovered metallurgy.</p><blockquote><div><p>explosive gunpowder, the cannon</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_firearms" title="wikipedia.org">Err, no.</a> [wikipedia.org]. The closest you could get would be the early use of firearms against the Byzantines, but the people involved were not African.</p><blockquote><div><p>CAT scanner</p></div></blockquote><p>Post-colonial South Africa doesn't count either, as it's culturally mostly European.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have nothing against Africa , but your post is full of lies.beerThe earliest beer [ wikipedia.org ] comes from Mesopotamia and Egypt ( which does n't count , as it 's culturally part of the Middle East ) .world 's tallest buildingEgypt does n't count.the roots of most modern popular music genresDubious at best .
The truth is that we have no idea what music sounded like before accurate musical notation came into widespread use during the Middle Ages [ wikipedia.org ] .airmail ( by homing pigeon ) The use of homing pigeons for communication was invented by several civilizations independently.the pendulumThe Chinese were the first to employ the pendulum , and Galileo Galilei was the first to study their properties mathematically.the tunnel boring machineHave a source for this one ?
It 's rather difficult to create a tunnel boring machine without at least a steam engine.the aqueductThe Nile does n't count.candles , glass , the water clockAgain , Egypt does n't count .
Alexandria counts even less , given its Hellenic character.metal block printingEveryone knows Gutenberg invented movable type.the ventilatorYou mean bellows ?
Invented independently by every civilization that discovered metallurgy.explosive gunpowder , the cannon Err , no .
[ wikipedia.org ] . The closest you could get would be the early use of firearms against the Byzantines , but the people involved were not African.CAT scannerPost-colonial South Africa does n't count either , as it 's culturally mostly European .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have nothing against Africa, but your post is full of lies.beerThe earliest beer [wikipedia.org] comes from Mesopotamia and Egypt (which doesn't count, as it's culturally part of the Middle East).world's tallest buildingEgypt doesn't count.the roots of most modern popular music genresDubious at best.
The truth is that we have no idea what music sounded like before accurate musical notation came into widespread use during the Middle Ages [wikipedia.org].airmail (by homing pigeon)The use of homing pigeons for communication was invented by several civilizations independently.the pendulumThe Chinese were the first to employ the pendulum, and Galileo Galilei was the first to study their properties mathematically.the tunnel boring machineHave a source for this one?
It's rather difficult to create a tunnel boring machine without at least a steam engine.the aqueductThe Nile doesn't count.candles, glass, the water clockAgain, Egypt doesn't count.
Alexandria counts even less, given its Hellenic character.metal block printingEveryone knows Gutenberg invented movable type.the ventilatorYou mean bellows?
Invented independently by every civilization that discovered metallurgy.explosive gunpowder, the cannon Err, no.
[wikipedia.org]. The closest you could get would be the early use of firearms against the Byzantines, but the people involved were not African.CAT scannerPost-colonial South Africa doesn't count either, as it's culturally mostly European.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305315</id>
	<title>Re:assuming a trend</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1244798700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That has some potential...</p><p>How about....</p><p>Rushnium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That has some potential...How about....Rushnium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That has some potential...How about....Rushnium?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294025</id>
	<title>The</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1244736060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Element formerly known as ununb"i. And give it some funky symbol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Element formerly known as ununb " i. And give it some funky symbol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Element formerly known as ununb"i. And give it some funky symbol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296519</id>
	<title>Re:I vote for Stuff.`</title>
	<author>An ominous Cow art</author>
	<datestamp>1244744940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it tastes good, it should be called 'Yumium'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it tastes good , it should be called 'Yumium' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it tastes good, it should be called 'Yumium'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296643</id>
	<title>Adamantium?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>somebody had to say it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>somebody had to say it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>somebody had to say it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303215</id>
	<title>Re:all hail....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244730600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All Glory to the hypnotoadium...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All Glory to the hypnotoadium.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All Glory to the hypnotoadium...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296311</id>
	<title>Re:Just give up</title>
	<author>tim\_darklighter</author>
	<datestamp>1244744160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, they'd change Am to BankofAmericium before that, and then make Barium become Bm so that they could have Ba.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they 'd change Am to BankofAmericium before that , and then make Barium become Bm so that they could have Ba .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they'd change Am to BankofAmericium before that, and then make Barium become Bm so that they could have Ba.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298987</id>
	<title>Re:Just give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244753400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has been modded funny, but if I were a betting man, I'd put my money on it being named after a corporation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been modded funny , but if I were a betting man , I 'd put my money on it being named after a corporation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been modded funny, but if I were a betting man, I'd put my money on it being named after a corporation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299389</id>
	<title>Re:Emergentium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244711640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Britain is not really Europe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Britain is not really Europe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Britain is not really Europe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296667</id>
	<title>Re:They flunked Latin...</title>
	<author>Phreakiture</author>
	<datestamp>1244745360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a standardized set of modules that are used for temporarily naming heavy elements, which modules are all one-syllable, and have been carefully selected from Latin and Greek both, with the purpose being to make sure that taking the first letter of each module will provide a unique mnemonic for the element.  Hence, element 112 gets the mnemonic Uub, just as Hydrogen gets H and Helium gets He.  The Latin-language correctness or incorrectness is not at all part of the consideration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a standardized set of modules that are used for temporarily naming heavy elements , which modules are all one-syllable , and have been carefully selected from Latin and Greek both , with the purpose being to make sure that taking the first letter of each module will provide a unique mnemonic for the element .
Hence , element 112 gets the mnemonic Uub , just as Hydrogen gets H and Helium gets He .
The Latin-language correctness or incorrectness is not at all part of the consideration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a standardized set of modules that are used for temporarily naming heavy elements, which modules are all one-syllable, and have been carefully selected from Latin and Greek both, with the purpose being to make sure that taking the first letter of each module will provide a unique mnemonic for the element.
Hence, element 112 gets the mnemonic Uub, just as Hydrogen gets H and Helium gets He.
The Latin-language correctness or incorrectness is not at all part of the consideration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296055</id>
	<title>Wildridium</title>
	<author>wylderide</author>
	<datestamp>1244743260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, just because it's got nothing to do with me is no reason they shouldn't name it after me, is it?  Well, they should do it anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , just because it 's got nothing to do with me is no reason they should n't name it after me , is it ?
Well , they should do it anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, just because it's got nothing to do with me is no reason they shouldn't name it after me, is it?
Well, they should do it anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701</id>
	<title>Re:Emergentium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244738520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No it's 0118 999 881 999 119 7253</htmltext>
<tokenext>No it 's 0118 999 881 999 119 7253</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it's 0118 999 881 999 119 7253</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295817</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1244742360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Protons, electrons, and sub-atomic particles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Protons , electrons , and sub-atomic particles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Protons, electrons, and sub-atomic particles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295979</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically, coffee and beer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically , coffee and beer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically, coffee and beer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296079</id>
	<title>Unobtainium</title>
	<author>iplayfast</author>
	<datestamp>1244743380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This stuff is so useful, that it can be used with any experiment to obtain the results you want.</p><p>So let's call 112 UnObtainium so we can finally do all those experiments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This stuff is so useful , that it can be used with any experiment to obtain the results you want.So let 's call 112 UnObtainium so we can finally do all those experiments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This stuff is so useful, that it can be used with any experiment to obtain the results you want.So let's call 112 UnObtainium so we can finally do all those experiments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297973</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>realnrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244749860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just like the rest of life, it boils down to the eternal question: "What have you done for me lately?" And 'lately' is a variable set by the question's asker defined as 'since the last time you did something for me.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like the rest of life , it boils down to the eternal question : " What have you done for me lately ?
" And 'lately ' is a variable set by the question 's asker defined as 'since the last time you did something for me .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like the rest of life, it boils down to the eternal question: "What have you done for me lately?
" And 'lately' is a variable set by the question's asker defined as 'since the last time you did something for me.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295965</id>
	<title>Yourmomium</title>
	<author>mcshiggits</author>
	<datestamp>1244742900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel very strongly that the heaviest element should always be known as yourmomium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel very strongly that the heaviest element should always be known as yourmomium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel very strongly that the heaviest element should always be known as yourmomium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296459</id>
	<title>Elerium-113</title>
	<author>IronDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1244744700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..one step closer to plasma cannons and antigravity engines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..one step closer to plasma cannons and antigravity engines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..one step closer to plasma cannons and antigravity engines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296857</id>
	<title>Next Question&#226;"What would you do with said el</title>
	<author>cdpage</author>
	<datestamp>1244746080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what reacts with zinc or lead that might explode?</htmltext>
<tokenext>what reacts with zinc or lead that might explode ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what reacts with zinc or lead that might explode?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293819</id>
	<title>Re:It's so obvious</title>
	<author>Hinhule</author>
	<datestamp>1244735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Made a post on the colbertnation boards about it yesterday, apparently I now have Hero status.</p><p><a href="http://forum.colbertnation.com/tcr/board/message?board.id=Stephen&amp;thread.id=3108" title="colbertnation.com" rel="nofollow">http://forum.colbertnation.com/tcr/board/message?board.id=Stephen&amp;thread.id=3108</a> [colbertnation.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Made a post on the colbertnation boards about it yesterday , apparently I now have Hero status.http : //forum.colbertnation.com/tcr/board/message ? board.id = Stephen&amp;thread.id = 3108 [ colbertnation.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Made a post on the colbertnation boards about it yesterday, apparently I now have Hero status.http://forum.colbertnation.com/tcr/board/message?board.id=Stephen&amp;thread.id=3108 [colbertnation.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297983</id>
	<title>You could always</title>
	<author>PoolOfThought</author>
	<datestamp>1244749920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>do just about anything really significant (shady or otherwise) if you want the kids to remember you in class.  Then if you are just wanting to complicate matters say something oddballish (Eurika!) immediately following your significant act. Then they'll have to remember the who and the what and the when of the act. But that won't be enough. They'll have to remember what magic word you said immediately afterwards... "TacoNealium!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>do just about anything really significant ( shady or otherwise ) if you want the kids to remember you in class .
Then if you are just wanting to complicate matters say something oddballish ( Eurika !
) immediately following your significant act .
Then they 'll have to remember the who and the what and the when of the act .
But that wo n't be enough .
They 'll have to remember what magic word you said immediately afterwards.. .
" TacoNealium ! "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do just about anything really significant (shady or otherwise) if you want the kids to remember you in class.
Then if you are just wanting to complicate matters say something oddballish (Eurika!
) immediately following your significant act.
Then they'll have to remember the who and the what and the when of the act.
But that won't be enough.
They'll have to remember what magic word you said immediately afterwards...
"TacoNealium!"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300809</id>
	<title>Periodic Table of Celebrities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244716620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LandoCalrissium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LandoCalrissium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LandoCalrissium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801</id>
	<title>Bushonium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In honor of the U.S. President who did so much to advance our respect for science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In honor of the U.S. President who did so much to advance our respect for science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In honor of the U.S. President who did so much to advance our respect for science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295569</id>
	<title>Re:assuming a trend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244741520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the best suggestion I've read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the best suggestion I 've read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the best suggestion I've read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300941</id>
	<title>Re:Just give up</title>
	<author>snookums</author>
	<datestamp>1244717160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless they open it to Internet voting. In which case it will be Nevergonnagiveyouupium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless they open it to Internet voting .
In which case it will be Nevergonnagiveyouupium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless they open it to Internet voting.
In which case it will be Nevergonnagiveyouupium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179</id>
	<title>Re:Bushonium</title>
	<author>Experiment 626</author>
	<datestamp>1244736600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>During Bush's administration, I would have taken that as sarcasm.  But after Obama's gutting the space budget, honoring Bush's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During Bush 's administration , I would have taken that as sarcasm .
But after Obama 's gutting the space budget , honoring Bush 's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During Bush's administration, I would have taken that as sarcasm.
But after Obama's gutting the space budget, honoring Bush's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295891</id>
	<title>Logical Proposal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244742660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they allow the public to weigh in on it's naming they should call it Gnutonium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they allow the public to weigh in on it 's naming they should call it Gnutonium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they allow the public to weigh in on it's naming they should call it Gnutonium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294435</id>
	<title>Ubuntium?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...since it's heavy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...since it 's heavy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...since it's heavy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294165</id>
	<title>I'd say...</title>
	<author>El\_Servas</author>
	<datestamp>1244736480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Servasium...</p><p>Damn.. there goes my karma. T\_T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Servasium...Damn.. there goes my karma .
T \ _T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Servasium...Damn.. there goes my karma.
T\_T</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295845</id>
	<title>anamyous coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244742480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Voldamortium - for the element that could not be named.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Voldamortium - for the element that could not be named .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Voldamortium - for the element that could not be named.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302647</id>
	<title>Considering its half-life</title>
	<author>SteveFoerster</author>
	<datestamp>1244726100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about "pandemonium"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " pandemonium " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "pandemonium"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28327625</id>
	<title>Let's see.  New and short lived...</title>
	<author>cryoknight</author>
	<datestamp>1245005520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Noobium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Noobium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Noobium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296801</id>
	<title>ok so only 4 atom have been observed...</title>
	<author>cdpage</author>
	<datestamp>1244745900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but can some one tell me, is this something that can possibly naturally occur? and if so, if were in abundance, would it still decay as rapidly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but can some one tell me , is this something that can possibly naturally occur ?
and if so , if were in abundance , would it still decay as rapidly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but can some one tell me, is this something that can possibly naturally occur?
and if so, if were in abundance, would it still decay as rapidly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299647</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244712600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you left one out...cotton-picking</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you left one out...cotton-picking</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you left one out...cotton-picking</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28337587</id>
	<title>suggest</title>
	<author>bruceslog</author>
	<datestamp>1245091260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BackToTheFutureum<br>heavy stuff.</p><p>Or maybe TripleStuffedTaconium.</p><p>TakesADecadeToNameium.</p><p>I have more !</p><p>This could be fun.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BackToTheFutureumheavy stuff.Or maybe TripleStuffedTaconium.TakesADecadeToNameium.I have more ! This could be fun .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BackToTheFutureumheavy stuff.Or maybe TripleStuffedTaconium.TakesADecadeToNameium.I have more !This could be fun.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295425</id>
	<title>Is it me or does this read like an Onion headline?</title>
	<author>lemurosity</author>
	<datestamp>1244740920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can see the sub-story: "US schools requiring bailout to support printing of new periodic tables."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see the sub-story : " US schools requiring bailout to support printing of new periodic tables .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see the sub-story: "US schools requiring bailout to support printing of new periodic tables.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294945</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Attlanttizz</author>
	<datestamp>1244739420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the other hand it is possible that this element is produced in some heavy mass stars, and even though it has a short life it is produced enough to call it an existing element.</p><p>I for one am surprised for instance that free standing neutrons have only a half-life of 15 minutes, even though it is stable when bound in a nucleus.</p><p>Perhaps element 112 could be stable when chemically bound to other elements? Not that I am any expert on this matter, just thinking out aloud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand it is possible that this element is produced in some heavy mass stars , and even though it has a short life it is produced enough to call it an existing element.I for one am surprised for instance that free standing neutrons have only a half-life of 15 minutes , even though it is stable when bound in a nucleus.Perhaps element 112 could be stable when chemically bound to other elements ?
Not that I am any expert on this matter , just thinking out aloud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand it is possible that this element is produced in some heavy mass stars, and even though it has a short life it is produced enough to call it an existing element.I for one am surprised for instance that free standing neutrons have only a half-life of 15 minutes, even though it is stable when bound in a nucleus.Perhaps element 112 could be stable when chemically bound to other elements?
Not that I am any expert on this matter, just thinking out aloud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295777</id>
	<title>Flubber?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244742180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flubber.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flubber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flubber.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295171</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244740200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Helium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Helium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Helium</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103</id>
	<title>Emergentium</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1244736300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Europe, the general emergency call number is 112. I also like Gentoo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Europe , the general emergency call number is 112 .
I also like Gentoo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Europe, the general emergency call number is 112.
I also like Gentoo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297343</id>
	<title>eleventytwosium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244747580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>c'mon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>c'mon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>c'mon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294011</id>
	<title>Unobtainium</title>
	<author>gigowiz</author>
	<datestamp>1244736000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not available anywhere!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not available anywhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not available anywhere!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294183</id>
	<title>guantuelv</title>
	<author>surkum</author>
	<datestamp>1244736600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about <b>guantuelv</b>, easy to remember<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about guantuelv , easy to remember : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about guantuelv, easy to remember :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302397</id>
	<title>After one of the greatest science fiction writers-</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244724360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buttheadium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buttheadium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buttheadium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295501</id>
	<title>Re:Good News Everyone!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244741280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that some sort of word play on Jim Bunion or did The Onion put you up to this ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that some sort of word play on Jim Bunion or did The Onion put you up to this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that some sort of word play on Jim Bunion or did The Onion put you up to this ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293873</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294127</id>
	<title>Trajanium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trajanium :</p><p>As in 112 A.D. the emperor of Rome was Trajan.<br>And under his rule, Roman Empire reached his maximum extent (113 A.D.)<br>Or will this be more suited for the next element (113), the ununtrium ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trajanium : As in 112 A.D. the emperor of Rome was Trajan.And under his rule , Roman Empire reached his maximum extent ( 113 A.D. ) Or will this be more suited for the next element ( 113 ) , the ununtrium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trajanium :As in 112 A.D. the emperor of Rome was Trajan.And under his rule, Roman Empire reached his maximum extent (113 A.D.)Or will this be more suited for the next element (113), the ununtrium ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</id>
	<title>assuming a trend</title>
	<author>spyrochaete</author>
	<datestamp>1244735160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Due to the atomic number 112 I recommend Fibonaccium, after the Fibonacci sequence which adds the 2 preceding numbers to find the next in sequence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to the atomic number 112 I recommend Fibonaccium , after the Fibonacci sequence which adds the 2 preceding numbers to find the next in sequence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to the atomic number 112 I recommend Fibonaccium, after the Fibonacci sequence which adds the 2 preceding numbers to find the next in sequence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28308895</id>
	<title>'Taconium' is Perfect</title>
	<author>airship</author>
	<datestamp>1244824320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think 'Taconium' is the perfect name. After all, it IS the heaviest of all the elements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think 'Taconium ' is the perfect name .
After all , it IS the heaviest of all the elements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think 'Taconium' is the perfect name.
After all, it IS the heaviest of all the elements.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296529</id>
	<title>Name Element 112 Auction</title>
	<author>intjgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244745000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would like the right to name the element to goto the highest bidder and all proceeds of the auction to goto charity.

See the auction at
<a href="http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=220432828283" title="cgi.ebay.ca" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=220432828283</a> [cgi.ebay.ca]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like the right to name the element to goto the highest bidder and all proceeds of the auction to goto charity .
See the auction at http : //cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ? ViewItem&amp;item = 220432828283 [ cgi.ebay.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like the right to name the element to goto the highest bidder and all proceeds of the auction to goto charity.
See the auction at
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=220432828283 [cgi.ebay.ca]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294371</id>
	<title>elem 112</title>
	<author>Mysund</author>
	<datestamp>1244737380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hundredandtwelvium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hundredandtwelvium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hundredandtwelvium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302911</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244727900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  <b>Quantum physics.</b>  As you say 'developed part of the foundation.'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.  It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.  Einstein was from Austria by the way.</p></div><p>James Clerk Maxwell was from Scotland by the way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quantum physics .
As you say 'developed part of the foundation .
' Quantum theory developed gradually , with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places .
It was not like Einstein 's theory of relativity , which was a real breakthrough ( although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell ( an Englishman ) and other past theories .
Einstein was from Austria by the way.James Clerk Maxwell was from Scotland by the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Quantum physics.
As you say 'developed part of the foundation.
'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.
It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.
Einstein was from Austria by the way.James Clerk Maxwell was from Scotland by the way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So whats the time?<br>Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.<br>Is it a millisecond? a full second? a year? million years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So whats the time ? Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.Is it a millisecond ?
a full second ?
a year ?
million years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So whats the time?Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.Is it a millisecond?
a full second?
a year?
million years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296265</id>
	<title>can someone clarify?</title>
	<author>Neotrantor</author>
	<datestamp>1244744040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do i remember the periodic table going up to 112 in the 90s?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do i remember the periodic table going up to 112 in the 90s ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do i remember the periodic table going up to 112 in the 90s?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301969</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who modded this redundant?  I submitted it less than a minute after the original.  So, it should be pretty obvious that the original wasn't there when I clicked "reply."</p><p>Sit ubu, sit.  Bad mod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who modded this redundant ?
I submitted it less than a minute after the original .
So , it should be pretty obvious that the original was n't there when I clicked " reply .
" Sit ubu , sit .
Bad mod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who modded this redundant?
I submitted it less than a minute after the original.
So, it should be pretty obvious that the original wasn't there when I clicked "reply.
"Sit ubu, sit.
Bad mod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305041</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>ailnlv</author>
	<datestamp>1244838660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Germans didn't start WW1, that was an Austrian invention. Germany was just dragged into the war because of a treaty, just like the rest of europe and russia. Hitler was Austrian too btw, and by 1939 Austria was part of Germany. So the whole starting and losing two world wars is mainly an Austrian invention.</p><p>Oh, hey! Godwin's law!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Germans did n't start WW1 , that was an Austrian invention .
Germany was just dragged into the war because of a treaty , just like the rest of europe and russia .
Hitler was Austrian too btw , and by 1939 Austria was part of Germany .
So the whole starting and losing two world wars is mainly an Austrian invention.Oh , hey !
Godwin 's law !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germans didn't start WW1, that was an Austrian invention.
Germany was just dragged into the war because of a treaty, just like the rest of europe and russia.
Hitler was Austrian too btw, and by 1939 Austria was part of Germany.
So the whole starting and losing two world wars is mainly an Austrian invention.Oh, hey!
Godwin's law!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295205</id>
	<title>wonderflonium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244740260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wonderflonium - it's the logical choice... (do not bounce)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wonderflonium - it 's the logical choice... ( do not bounce )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wonderflonium - it's the logical choice... (do not bounce)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295625</id>
	<title>Re:I hate whoever renamed unununium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244741700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays, and was awarded the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for that discovery. The element 111 was named after him in order to honor him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays , and was awarded the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for that discovery .
The element 111 was named after him in order to honor him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays, and was awarded the first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for that discovery.
The element 111 was named after him in order to honor him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296341</id>
	<title>Dammit</title>
	<author>wurp</author>
	<datestamp>1244744280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yesterday I had mod points.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yesterday I had mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yesterday I had mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297053</id>
	<title>Futurama reference...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244746740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you guys kidding me?</p><p>That's Dolemite, baby!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you guys kidding me ? That 's Dolemite , baby !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you guys kidding me?That's Dolemite, baby!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295229</id>
	<title>Re:Cardboardium.</title>
	<author>jeffshoaf</author>
	<datestamp>1244740320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The most useful element.</p></div><p>
Nope - that would be ducttapeium.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most useful element .
Nope - that would be ducttapeium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most useful element.
Nope - that would be ducttapeium.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302719</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244726460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While such lists are always senseless. Your argument is it too, because on one hand you say (correctly) that many inventions developed gradually, and on the other hand you want to discredit the list by pointing out other people have done something similar before.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>  <b>The first car.</b></p><p>Carl Benz and Gottlieb Daimler developed automobiles based on gasoline driven engines. However, the idea of machine powered vehicles came up with steam engines. Therefore many attempts have been made to create a steam driven vehicle. Later Rudolf Diesel developed the diesel engine which is a derivate of the gasoline based engines. So who did the most important invention? Those persons thinking about a engine-driven vehicle or those who developed engines which allowed to create working implementations of this idea.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> I think a frenchman was actually the first, but the real innovation was Henry Ford's mass production assembly line, not the automobile itself.</p></div><p>The idea of an assembly line was long known and used in manufactories. Ford used the concept on cars. This was a great idea, but on what basis could you say that invention was more important than the other. When all these car developers which developed cars before Henry Ford didn't improve the concept of a car, Henry wouldn't had the chance to develop cheap cars. The same is about human flight. Many people tried it. They tested various ideas. Lilienthal was on of the first to fly or glide with an apparatus . And the Wright brothers were one of the first to make a motor flight.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>  <b>Calculus.</b> Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway. Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians.  The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing (and innovative) with it.</p></div><p>Hello? While Newton developed the same stuff as Leibniz, he made something truly amazing, while the other guy didn't? So either both found interesting things in mathematics or both just assembled pieces created by others or they did something of both.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>  <b>Quantum physics.</b>  As you say 'developed part of the foundation.'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.  It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.  Einstein was from Austria by the way.</p></div><p>Beside the point, that a lot of people contributed to this field and there were many Germans involved in it. And also Einstein's wife. And he developed the idea in Switzerland. And no: Einstein was born in Ulm, Germany which belonged to the German Empire at that time.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>So all your examples are sort of 'me too' or 'i helped out' innovations.  You would be better off to look at the French (Curie, Pasteur, or even  Descartes).  Or the English (Darwin, Newton).  Or the Italians (Galileo, Marconi, etc.).  And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe (since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad).</p></div><p>Yes Galileo, the man behind the Copernican Change? Who had help from Johannes Kepler? And if you dig deeper in this subject, you will find other great minds had discovered the same thing in India and China. Oh and they all didn't know each other.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>And lets not forget the Americans.  There is no ethnic identity associated with being American, but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything.</p></div><p>Blah, blah. On the same bases you could say, that the heterogeneity of Europe allows scientists different views to a subject and therefor they were so innovative in the past centuries.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>So to bring it down to your level, what have the Germans really innovated, uniquely and on their own?  How to start (and loose) two world wars?  How to best gas Jewish people?</p></div><p>This sounds like a phrase from Monty Python's "The Life of Brian": What have the Romans ever done for us?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>  But seriously, the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology.  That can not be ignored.  But not more than many other nations.  They are about par for the course.</p></div><p>This is definitely true. However, you never know how great the contribution of anyone is, because that perception of that might chance over time. Also I would not attach these achievements to nations, because when Einstein came up with his theory, his fellow Germans did not contribute to it. And you cannot thank Einstein for it alone, because other people helped him with the math, all the work before him etc.</p><p>But to come back to the subject of the article: They should call it Relaxium.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While such lists are always senseless .
Your argument is it too , because on one hand you say ( correctly ) that many inventions developed gradually , and on the other hand you want to discredit the list by pointing out other people have done something similar before .
The first car.Carl Benz and Gottlieb Daimler developed automobiles based on gasoline driven engines .
However , the idea of machine powered vehicles came up with steam engines .
Therefore many attempts have been made to create a steam driven vehicle .
Later Rudolf Diesel developed the diesel engine which is a derivate of the gasoline based engines .
So who did the most important invention ?
Those persons thinking about a engine-driven vehicle or those who developed engines which allowed to create working implementations of this idea .
I think a frenchman was actually the first , but the real innovation was Henry Ford 's mass production assembly line , not the automobile itself.The idea of an assembly line was long known and used in manufactories .
Ford used the concept on cars .
This was a great idea , but on what basis could you say that invention was more important than the other .
When all these car developers which developed cars before Henry Ford did n't improve the concept of a car , Henry would n't had the chance to develop cheap cars .
The same is about human flight .
Many people tried it .
They tested various ideas .
Lilienthal was on of the first to fly or glide with an apparatus .
And the Wright brothers were one of the first to make a motor flight .
Calculus. Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway .
Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians .
The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing ( and innovative ) with it.Hello ?
While Newton developed the same stuff as Leibniz , he made something truly amazing , while the other guy did n't ?
So either both found interesting things in mathematics or both just assembled pieces created by others or they did something of both .
Quantum physics .
As you say 'developed part of the foundation .
' Quantum theory developed gradually , with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places .
It was not like Einstein 's theory of relativity , which was a real breakthrough ( although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell ( an Englishman ) and other past theories .
Einstein was from Austria by the way.Beside the point , that a lot of people contributed to this field and there were many Germans involved in it .
And also Einstein 's wife .
And he developed the idea in Switzerland .
And no : Einstein was born in Ulm , Germany which belonged to the German Empire at that time.So all your examples are sort of 'me too ' or 'i helped out ' innovations .
You would be better off to look at the French ( Curie , Pasteur , or even Descartes ) .
Or the English ( Darwin , Newton ) .
Or the Italians ( Galileo , Marconi , etc. ) .
And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe ( since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad ) .Yes Galileo , the man behind the Copernican Change ?
Who had help from Johannes Kepler ?
And if you dig deeper in this subject , you will find other great minds had discovered the same thing in India and China .
Oh and they all did n't know each other.And lets not forget the Americans .
There is no ethnic identity associated with being American , but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything.Blah , blah .
On the same bases you could say , that the heterogeneity of Europe allows scientists different views to a subject and therefor they were so innovative in the past centuries.So to bring it down to your level , what have the Germans really innovated , uniquely and on their own ?
How to start ( and loose ) two world wars ?
How to best gas Jewish people ? This sounds like a phrase from Monty Python 's " The Life of Brian " : What have the Romans ever done for us ?
But seriously , the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology .
That can not be ignored .
But not more than many other nations .
They are about par for the course.This is definitely true .
However , you never know how great the contribution of anyone is , because that perception of that might chance over time .
Also I would not attach these achievements to nations , because when Einstein came up with his theory , his fellow Germans did not contribute to it .
And you can not thank Einstein for it alone , because other people helped him with the math , all the work before him etc.But to come back to the subject of the article : They should call it Relaxium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While such lists are always senseless.
Your argument is it too, because on one hand you say (correctly) that many inventions developed gradually, and on the other hand you want to discredit the list by pointing out other people have done something similar before.
The first car.Carl Benz and Gottlieb Daimler developed automobiles based on gasoline driven engines.
However, the idea of machine powered vehicles came up with steam engines.
Therefore many attempts have been made to create a steam driven vehicle.
Later Rudolf Diesel developed the diesel engine which is a derivate of the gasoline based engines.
So who did the most important invention?
Those persons thinking about a engine-driven vehicle or those who developed engines which allowed to create working implementations of this idea.
I think a frenchman was actually the first, but the real innovation was Henry Ford's mass production assembly line, not the automobile itself.The idea of an assembly line was long known and used in manufactories.
Ford used the concept on cars.
This was a great idea, but on what basis could you say that invention was more important than the other.
When all these car developers which developed cars before Henry Ford didn't improve the concept of a car, Henry wouldn't had the chance to develop cheap cars.
The same is about human flight.
Many people tried it.
They tested various ideas.
Lilienthal was on of the first to fly or glide with an apparatus .
And the Wright brothers were one of the first to make a motor flight.
Calculus. Leibniz and Newton are not co-inventors - not really anyway.
Basically they both built on work done by others including al-Haythem and other decidedly non-German mathematicians.
The difference is that Newton did something truly amazing (and innovative) with it.Hello?
While Newton developed the same stuff as Leibniz, he made something truly amazing, while the other guy didn't?
So either both found interesting things in mathematics or both just assembled pieces created by others or they did something of both.
Quantum physics.
As you say 'developed part of the foundation.
'  Quantum theory developed gradually, with contributions of a lot of people from a lot of places.
It was not like Einstein's theory of relativity, which was a real breakthrough (although it too relied on the field equations of Maxwell (an Englishman) and other past theories.
Einstein was from Austria by the way.Beside the point, that a lot of people contributed to this field and there were many Germans involved in it.
And also Einstein's wife.
And he developed the idea in Switzerland.
And no: Einstein was born in Ulm, Germany which belonged to the German Empire at that time.So all your examples are sort of 'me too' or 'i helped out' innovations.
You would be better off to look at the French (Curie, Pasteur, or even  Descartes).
Or the English (Darwin, Newton).
Or the Italians (Galileo, Marconi, etc.).
And I am just picking a few of the bigs from Europe (since I am not readily familiar with the history of science outside the western world - my bad).Yes Galileo, the man behind the Copernican Change?
Who had help from Johannes Kepler?
And if you dig deeper in this subject, you will find other great minds had discovered the same thing in India and China.
Oh and they all didn't know each other.And lets not forget the Americans.
There is no ethnic identity associated with being American, but one could argue that is their strength - the mixing together of scientists who hail from all parts of the world with different cultural backgrounds and ways of thinking about life the universe and everything.Blah, blah.
On the same bases you could say, that the heterogeneity of Europe allows scientists different views to a subject and therefor they were so innovative in the past centuries.So to bring it down to your level, what have the Germans really innovated, uniquely and on their own?
How to start (and loose) two world wars?
How to best gas Jewish people?This sounds like a phrase from Monty Python's "The Life of Brian": What have the Romans ever done for us?
But seriously, the Germans have made great contributions to science and technology.
That can not be ignored.
But not more than many other nations.
They are about par for the course.This is definitely true.
However, you never know how great the contribution of anyone is, because that perception of that might chance over time.
Also I would not attach these achievements to nations, because when Einstein came up with his theory, his fellow Germans did not contribute to it.
And you cannot thank Einstein for it alone, because other people helped him with the math, all the work before him etc.But to come back to the subject of the article: They should call it Relaxium.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296167</id>
	<title>Re:elem 112</title>
	<author>Celeste R</author>
	<datestamp>1244743680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eleventytwodium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eleventytwodium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eleventytwodium</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294371</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298933</id>
	<title>It obviously should be called ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244753160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It obviously should be called <a href="http://www.made-in-china.com/image/2f0j00YMSaHRJBJQfoM/24inch-Potted-Geranium.jpg" title="made-in-china.com" rel="nofollow">Geranium</a> [made-in-china.com], since it is a trans-uranic element discovered in Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It obviously should be called Geranium [ made-in-china.com ] , since it is a trans-uranic element discovered in Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It obviously should be called Geranium [made-in-china.com], since it is a trans-uranic element discovered in Germany.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303415</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244732340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe anybody has said adamantium....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe anybody has said adamantium... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe anybody has said adamantium....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296177</id>
	<title>Priorities...</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1244743740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In light of the amount of suffering taking place in the world : Thiswasmoreimportantium</htmltext>
<tokenext>In light of the amount of suffering taking place in the world : Thiswasmoreimportantium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In light of the amount of suffering taking place in the world : Thiswasmoreimportantium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293825</id>
	<title>I vote for Stuff.`</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1244735280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe etherium.<br>uberium.<br>
&nbsp; SteveJobbsium.<br>Linuxium<br>novaium<br>or just stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe etherium.uberium .
  SteveJobbsium.Linuxiumnovaiumor just stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe etherium.uberium.
  SteveJobbsium.Linuxiumnovaiumor just stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294515</id>
	<title>Re:I hate whoever renamed unununium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unununium was such an awesome name, why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium? What does that mean anyway? Does it mean it creates rodents?</p></div><p>ouch.  Just.... ouch.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm\_Conrad\_R\%C3\%B6ntgen</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unununium was such an awesome name , why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium ?
What does that mean anyway ?
Does it mean it creates rodents ? ouch .
Just.... ouch.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm \ _Conrad \ _R \ % C3 \ % B6ntgen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unununium was such an awesome name, why did they have to rename it something stupid like roentgenium?
What does that mean anyway?
Does it mean it creates rodents?ouch.
Just.... ouch.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm\_Conrad\_R\%C3\%B6ntgen
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1244736840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.</p></div></blockquote><p>As in it will decay into something else?</p><p>And what exactly will hydrogen decay into?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.As in it will decay into something else ? And what exactly will hydrogen decay into ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything on the periodic tables will fade after a time.As in it will decay into something else?And what exactly will hydrogen decay into?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299867</id>
	<title>Isn't it obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244713380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GoldenPalace.comium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GoldenPalace.comium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GoldenPalace.comium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293839</id>
	<title>Bolognium</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1244735340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Such a crappy element.</p><p>Or maybe how about Moronium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Such a crappy element.Or maybe how about Moronium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such a crappy element.Or maybe how about Moronium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295487</id>
	<title>So the name for now is...</title>
	<author>roskoff</author>
	<datestamp>1244741220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. a conundrium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. a conundrium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. a conundrium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997</id>
	<title>Cardboardium.</title>
	<author>Franklin Brauner</author>
	<datestamp>1244735940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most useful element.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most useful element .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most useful element.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297257</id>
	<title>Well Since they are German. . .</title>
	<author>XiX36</author>
	<datestamp>1244747400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's got to have a really long name made out of a string of words something that might look like:

<p>Atomare-Struktur-Mit-Hundertzw&#195;lf-Protonen-Und- Elektronen-Die-Zeigt-dass-Deutschland-Ist-Wissenschaftlich-Besser-Als-Alle-Anderen-Nationen-Der-Welt,-Nehmen-Sie-Sich-Also-Dass Francium!</p><p>(Nuclear-Structure With 112 protons &amp; electrons That showsthat Germany Is Scientifically better than any other nation in the world, so take that Francium!
note: quite probably just gibberish in German, as it has been babelfished<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's got to have a really long name made out of a string of words something that might look like : Atomare-Struktur-Mit-Hundertzw   lf-Protonen-Und- Elektronen-Die-Zeigt-dass-Deutschland-Ist-Wissenschaftlich-Besser-Als-Alle-Anderen-Nationen-Der-Welt,-Nehmen-Sie-Sich-Also-Dass Francium !
( Nuclear-Structure With 112 protons &amp; electrons That showsthat Germany Is Scientifically better than any other nation in the world , so take that Francium !
note : quite probably just gibberish in German , as it has been babelfished ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's got to have a really long name made out of a string of words something that might look like:

Atomare-Struktur-Mit-HundertzwÃlf-Protonen-Und- Elektronen-Die-Zeigt-dass-Deutschland-Ist-Wissenschaftlich-Besser-Als-Alle-Anderen-Nationen-Der-Welt,-Nehmen-Sie-Sich-Also-Dass Francium!
(Nuclear-Structure With 112 protons &amp; electrons That showsthat Germany Is Scientifically better than any other nation in the world, so take that Francium!
note: quite probably just gibberish in German, as it has been babelfished ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297879</id>
	<title>Debianium?</title>
	<author>Big\_Monkey\_Bird</author>
	<datestamp>1244749560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Debianium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Debianium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Debianium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301517</id>
	<title>Goodie</title>
	<author>Martin Spamer</author>
	<datestamp>1244719500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should be called the Goodie, because it's dense, unstable and has a short life span.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be called the Goodie , because it 's dense , unstable and has a short life span .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be called the Goodie, because it's dense, unstable and has a short life span.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294189</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Deadstick</author>
	<datestamp>1244736660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But be careful to keep Jumbonium off the tracks.</p><p>rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But be careful to keep Jumbonium off the tracks.rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But be careful to keep Jumbonium off the tracks.rj</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304609</id>
	<title>Re:It's so obvious</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1244745120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...</p></div><p>First you get your mod points spent</p><p>Then you name the element</p><p>Which the trolls will then lament</p><p>Then you rant then you rant then you rant</p><p>Then for real fun</p><p>Use a good pun</p><p>Give it real class! Name it TommyLeherium!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...First you get your mod points spentThen you name the elementWhich the trolls will then lamentThen you rant then you rant then you rantThen for real funUse a good punGive it real class !
Name it TommyLeherium !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...First you get your mod points spentThen you name the elementWhich the trolls will then lamentThen you rant then you rant then you rantThen for real funUse a good punGive it real class!
Name it TommyLeherium!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296115</id>
	<title>used for?</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1244743440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All jokes aside now... what on earth is the use of such a super-heavy element? And why did they strive to create it - just to prove they could?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All jokes aside now... what on earth is the use of such a super-heavy element ?
And why did they strive to create it - just to prove they could ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All jokes aside now... what on earth is the use of such a super-heavy element?
And why did they strive to create it - just to prove they could?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294855</id>
	<title>yes but to a relativistic fly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244739060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>think about time dilation of one of these elements as it enters some fantastically acceleration, such as near a black hole. the element's "wall clock" half life would be drastically expanded, and you would see it quite well, perhaps as seconds, or hours, or days...</p><p>also think about a fly. to them time passes differently than for you and me.</p><p>so just in case you are ever transformed into a fly, and you are sitting next to a black hole in a magic bubble looking at someone drop huge blobs of super-elements into it, remember... you want to have names for all those things. not just silly numbers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>think about time dilation of one of these elements as it enters some fantastically acceleration , such as near a black hole .
the element 's " wall clock " half life would be drastically expanded , and you would see it quite well , perhaps as seconds , or hours , or days...also think about a fly .
to them time passes differently than for you and me.so just in case you are ever transformed into a fly , and you are sitting next to a black hole in a magic bubble looking at someone drop huge blobs of super-elements into it , remember... you want to have names for all those things .
not just silly numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>think about time dilation of one of these elements as it enters some fantastically acceleration, such as near a black hole.
the element's "wall clock" half life would be drastically expanded, and you would see it quite well, perhaps as seconds, or hours, or days...also think about a fly.
to them time passes differently than for you and me.so just in case you are ever transformed into a fly, and you are sitting next to a black hole in a magic bubble looking at someone drop huge blobs of super-elements into it, remember... you want to have names for all those things.
not just silly numbers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294523</id>
	<title>How about ...</title>
	<author>Sukhbir</author>
	<datestamp>1244737920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ubuntium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299355</id>
	<title>Whatever they name it</title>
	<author>Gryle</author>
	<datestamp>1244711580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The chemical should be "T", so that I can finally write Tungsten $ELEMENTNAME Flourine when I'm frustrated with lab results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The chemical should be " T " , so that I can finally write Tungsten $ ELEMENTNAME Flourine when I 'm frustrated with lab results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chemical should be "T", so that I can finally write Tungsten $ELEMENTNAME Flourine when I'm frustrated with lab results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294161</id>
	<title>ignotium</title>
	<author>elrick\_the\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1244736480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the root Latin word:</p><p>ignotus : unknown, obscure, ignorant, ignoble</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the root Latin word : ignotus : unknown , obscure , ignorant , ignoble</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the root Latin word:ignotus : unknown, obscure, ignorant, ignoble</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295855</id>
	<title>Ubuntium? :)</title>
	<author>tomweeks</author>
	<datestamp>1244742540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then  you can tell people that running Linux is an elemental experience.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Tweeks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you can tell people that running Linux is an elemental experience .
: ) Tweeks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then  you can tell people that running Linux is an elemental experience.
:)Tweeks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301061</id>
	<title>www.goldenpalace.comium</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1244717580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>er or something. Take 2 pentium and call me in the morning</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>er or something .
Take 2 pentium and call me in the morning</tokentext>
<sentencetext>er or something.
Take 2 pentium and call me in the morning</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304857</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244748780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many of these are pre-history or not African at all.  The remainder are largely Ancient Egyptian.</p><p>You could be more careful... there <i>are</i> examples worth raising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of these are pre-history or not African at all .
The remainder are largely Ancient Egyptian.You could be more careful... there are examples worth raising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of these are pre-history or not African at all.
The remainder are largely Ancient Egyptian.You could be more careful... there are examples worth raising.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295335</id>
	<title>Sub ubi</title>
	<author>Tickety-boo</author>
	<datestamp>1244740680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about <i>Semperubisububium</i>
<br> <br>
Always wear under wear</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Semperubisububium Always wear under wear</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Semperubisububium
 
Always wear under wear</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294059</id>
	<title>Take a page from hollywood</title>
	<author>somecreepyoldguy</author>
	<datestamp>1244736120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>make it a sequel
how about

Oxygen2
Silicon 2.0
Plutonium 4: This Time its Personal</htmltext>
<tokenext>make it a sequel how about Oxygen2 Silicon 2.0 Plutonium 4 : This Time its Personal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>make it a sequel
how about

Oxygen2
Silicon 2.0
Plutonium 4: This Time its Personal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300753</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1244716380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, IAAP</p></div><p>What's a pemist?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , IAAPWhat 's a pemist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, IAAPWhat's a pemist?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297377</id>
	<title>hmm</title>
	<author>CrazyJim1</author>
	<datestamp>1244747700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stadium?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stadium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stadium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301909</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>shermo</author>
	<datestamp>1244721300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So essentially what you're saying is that they all stole the ideas from someone else and then improved on them?</p><p>Thankfully, modern copyright laws are putting an end to this despicable practice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So essentially what you 're saying is that they all stole the ideas from someone else and then improved on them ? Thankfully , modern copyright laws are putting an end to this despicable practice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So essentially what you're saying is that they all stole the ideas from someone else and then improved on them?Thankfully, modern copyright laws are putting an end to this despicable practice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296617</id>
	<title>Obvious</title>
	<author>He who knows</author>
	<datestamp>1244745240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nevergonagiveyouupium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nevergonagiveyouupium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nevergonagiveyouupium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293873</id>
	<title>Good News Everyone!</title>
	<author>Bob Loblaw</author>
	<datestamp>1244735520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new element will be named Jumbonion, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new element will be named Jumbonion , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new element will be named Jumbonion, of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293783</id>
	<title>Good News Everyone!</title>
	<author>strength\_of\_10\_men</author>
	<datestamp>1244735160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've found the Jumbonium that I've misplaced!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've found the Jumbonium that I 've misplaced !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've found the Jumbonium that I've misplaced!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294089</id>
	<title>Geekoidium</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244736240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or maybe Farnsworthium? Herbertium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or maybe Farnsworthium ?
Herbertium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or maybe Farnsworthium?
Herbertium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297673</id>
	<title>Re:Cardboardium.</title>
	<author>dodobh</author>
	<datestamp>1244748840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ductapium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ductapium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ductapium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294529</id>
	<title>island of stability</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1244737920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's interesting about this kind of thing is that it's getting very close to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island\_of\_stability" title="wikipedia.org">island of stability</a> [wikipedia.org], which is a predicted set of heavy elements that would be stable with respect to fission. What they made is Z=112 (number of protons) and N=165 (number of neutrons), which is a little on the neutron-deficient side of the island in the WP article's chart. If you want to go nuts with far-future scientific extrapolation, it's conceivable that if you could make the isotopes on the actual island of stability, you could actually have macroscopic quantities of the stuff. It would probably be extremely susceptible to neutron-induced fission, so you could probably make a nuclear bomb the size of a pencil eraser. Arms control would get really tough! So maybe it's fortunate that there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island\_of\_stability#Synthesis\_problems" title="wikipedia.org">extremely difficult technical problems</a> [wikipedia.org] to be solved before we can get there.
</p><p> To a nuclear physicist, what's  more interesting about this kind of thing is that it's a sensitive test of models of nuclear forces and models of the many-body problem. The strong nuclear force isn't like gravity and electromagnetism, which are simple 1/r^2 forces; it doesn't have simple mathematical behavior, and all we have are approximations to its behavior. Also, many-body problems -- even classical many-body problems -- are really tough. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's interesting about this kind of thing is that it 's getting very close to the island of stability [ wikipedia.org ] , which is a predicted set of heavy elements that would be stable with respect to fission .
What they made is Z = 112 ( number of protons ) and N = 165 ( number of neutrons ) , which is a little on the neutron-deficient side of the island in the WP article 's chart .
If you want to go nuts with far-future scientific extrapolation , it 's conceivable that if you could make the isotopes on the actual island of stability , you could actually have macroscopic quantities of the stuff .
It would probably be extremely susceptible to neutron-induced fission , so you could probably make a nuclear bomb the size of a pencil eraser .
Arms control would get really tough !
So maybe it 's fortunate that there are extremely difficult technical problems [ wikipedia.org ] to be solved before we can get there .
To a nuclear physicist , what 's more interesting about this kind of thing is that it 's a sensitive test of models of nuclear forces and models of the many-body problem .
The strong nuclear force is n't like gravity and electromagnetism , which are simple 1/r ^ 2 forces ; it does n't have simple mathematical behavior , and all we have are approximations to its behavior .
Also , many-body problems -- even classical many-body problems -- are really tough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's interesting about this kind of thing is that it's getting very close to the island of stability [wikipedia.org], which is a predicted set of heavy elements that would be stable with respect to fission.
What they made is Z=112 (number of protons) and N=165 (number of neutrons), which is a little on the neutron-deficient side of the island in the WP article's chart.
If you want to go nuts with far-future scientific extrapolation, it's conceivable that if you could make the isotopes on the actual island of stability, you could actually have macroscopic quantities of the stuff.
It would probably be extremely susceptible to neutron-induced fission, so you could probably make a nuclear bomb the size of a pencil eraser.
Arms control would get really tough!
So maybe it's fortunate that there are extremely difficult technical problems [wikipedia.org] to be solved before we can get there.
To a nuclear physicist, what's  more interesting about this kind of thing is that it's a sensitive test of models of nuclear forces and models of the many-body problem.
The strong nuclear force isn't like gravity and electromagnetism, which are simple 1/r^2 forces; it doesn't have simple mathematical behavior, and all we have are approximations to its behavior.
Also, many-body problems -- even classical many-body problems -- are really tough. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294167</id>
	<title>unnameium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it is unnamed, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it is unnamed , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it is unnamed, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28310863</id>
	<title>For the Linux crowd...</title>
	<author>thexile</author>
	<datestamp>1244832060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ubuntunium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntunium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntunium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28312307</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maxwell was not English.  He was Scottish. You are from America?  So I will say you are from Mexico.  Its not rocket science to get the basic facts correct</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maxwell was not English .
He was Scottish .
You are from America ?
So I will say you are from Mexico .
Its not rocket science to get the basic facts correct</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maxwell was not English.
He was Scottish.
You are from America?
So I will say you are from Mexico.
Its not rocket science to get the basic facts correct</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303289</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>beav007</author>
	<datestamp>1244731140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>By this logic we can extrapolate that the USA has never invented more than the Teepee and peace pipe, as the majority of the population are not native.<br>
<br>
Egypt is geographically African, and that's enough.<blockquote><div class="quote"><p>the aqueduct</p></div><div><p>The Nile doesn't count.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Who said anything about the Nile? The Egyptians had sophisticated <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueducts#Ancient\_aqueducts" title="wikipedia.org">irrigation systems.</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
<br>
Another thing we can credit to Egyptians, and thus to Africa, is antibiotics:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Antibiotics are compounds produced by bacteria and fungi which are capable of killing, or inhibiting, competing microbial species. This phenomenon has long been known; it may explain why the ancient Egyptians had the practice of applying a poultice of moldy bread to infected wounds.</p></div><p> <a href="http://acswebcontent.acs.org/landmarks/landmarks/penicillin/discover.html" title="acs.org">http://acswebcontent.acs.org/landmarks/landmarks/penicillin/discover.html</a> [acs.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>By this logic we can extrapolate that the USA has never invented more than the Teepee and peace pipe , as the majority of the population are not native .
Egypt is geographically African , and that 's enough.the aqueductThe Nile does n't count .
Who said anything about the Nile ?
The Egyptians had sophisticated irrigation systems .
[ wikipedia.org ] Another thing we can credit to Egyptians , and thus to Africa , is antibiotics : Antibiotics are compounds produced by bacteria and fungi which are capable of killing , or inhibiting , competing microbial species .
This phenomenon has long been known ; it may explain why the ancient Egyptians had the practice of applying a poultice of moldy bread to infected wounds .
http : //acswebcontent.acs.org/landmarks/landmarks/penicillin/discover.html [ acs.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By this logic we can extrapolate that the USA has never invented more than the Teepee and peace pipe, as the majority of the population are not native.
Egypt is geographically African, and that's enough.the aqueductThe Nile doesn't count.
Who said anything about the Nile?
The Egyptians had sophisticated irrigation systems.
[wikipedia.org] 

Another thing we can credit to Egyptians, and thus to Africa, is antibiotics:Antibiotics are compounds produced by bacteria and fungi which are capable of killing, or inhibiting, competing microbial species.
This phenomenon has long been known; it may explain why the ancient Egyptians had the practice of applying a poultice of moldy bread to infected wounds.
http://acswebcontent.acs.org/landmarks/landmarks/penicillin/discover.html [acs.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294511</id>
	<title>How about...</title>
	<author>Drone69</author>
	<datestamp>1244737860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Element Formerly Known as Ununbium

?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Element Formerly Known as Ununbium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Element Formerly Known as Ununbium

?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294219</id>
	<title>In light of its size</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1244736780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lipidium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lipidium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lipidium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298043</id>
	<title>Re:Bushonium</title>
	<author>realnrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244750100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More accurate would be Dumdum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More accurate would be Dumdum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More accurate would be Dumdum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295741</id>
	<title>Slashdotium</title>
	<author>Petersko</author>
	<datestamp>1244742120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdotium is a terrible idea. Most scientists studying it won't even bother to take measurements. They'll just assume they know what the results will be and they'll write pages and pages of opinions on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotium is a terrible idea .
Most scientists studying it wo n't even bother to take measurements .
They 'll just assume they know what the results will be and they 'll write pages and pages of opinions on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotium is a terrible idea.
Most scientists studying it won't even bother to take measurements.
They'll just assume they know what the results will be and they'll write pages and pages of opinions on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296989</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>XcepticZP</author>
	<datestamp>1244746560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No that happened in the middle east.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No that happened in the middle east .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No that happened in the middle east.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298133</id>
	<title>Phlebotinum</title>
	<author>realnrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244750340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe Rebelscum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe Rebelscum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe Rebelscum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294719</id>
	<title>Re:Just give up</title>
	<author>WWWWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244738580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's going to be something like: BankofAmericaElementium</p></div><p>Bah, if the corporate interests get to name it, then it's obviously going to be Aureipalatium or something, because <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callicebus\_aureipalatii" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">some companies just love to do that sort of things</a> [wikipedia.org] and have previous experience on the practice. =)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going to be something like : BankofAmericaElementiumBah , if the corporate interests get to name it , then it 's obviously going to be Aureipalatium or something , because some companies just love to do that sort of things [ wikipedia.org ] and have previous experience on the practice .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going to be something like: BankofAmericaElementiumBah, if the corporate interests get to name it, then it's obviously going to be Aureipalatium or something, because some companies just love to do that sort of things [wikipedia.org] and have previous experience on the practice.
=)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293831</id>
	<title>Old school.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Upsidaisium.

Or wonderflonium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Upsidaisium .
Or wonderflonium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Upsidaisium.
Or wonderflonium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296507</id>
	<title>Expensive. Unstable. Vistaonium</title>
	<author>wowbagger</author>
	<datestamp>1244744880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a very expensive to create, very unstable material. Obviously, it should be called Vistaonium.</p><p>The beauty is that we have a natural way to refer to isotopes of it: Vistaonium-home, Vistaonium-business, Vistaonium-premium, Vistaonium-lite, etc.</p><p>When we start hitting the island of stability and get stuff that will hang together, we can name it Gnuonium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a very expensive to create , very unstable material .
Obviously , it should be called Vistaonium.The beauty is that we have a natural way to refer to isotopes of it : Vistaonium-home , Vistaonium-business , Vistaonium-premium , Vistaonium-lite , etc.When we start hitting the island of stability and get stuff that will hang together , we can name it Gnuonium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a very expensive to create, very unstable material.
Obviously, it should be called Vistaonium.The beauty is that we have a natural way to refer to isotopes of it: Vistaonium-home, Vistaonium-business, Vistaonium-premium, Vistaonium-lite, etc.When we start hitting the island of stability and get stuff that will hang together, we can name it Gnuonium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294309</id>
	<title>It's about time...</title>
	<author>sagematt</author>
	<datestamp>1244737200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Goatsecxium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goatsecxium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goatsecxium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295083</id>
	<title>Tylium</title>
	<author>ManWithIceCream</author>
	<datestamp>1244739960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should call it Tylium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should call it Tylium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should call it Tylium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296587</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Wrath0fb0b</author>
	<datestamp>1244745120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the nuclei of elements below (and including) lead are infinitely stable* ** -- you would have to input energy to break those nuclei apart. Be grateful for this -- this allows the sun to generate energy from 4H-&gt;He -- that reaction is downhill in energy, albeit with a huge activation barrier.</p><p>If all elements decayed into hydrogen, nuclear fusion would be impossible and the universe would be a colder, darker place than it already is.</p><p>* That is, there exists at least one infinitely-stable isotope for that element, for those that want to quibble.</p><p>** According to all proven physics (e.g. the Standard Model -- you don't get a name like that without being pretty well hashed out). String theory suggests the decay of the proton, which might change this. On the other hand, string theory suggests all kinds of wacky and sometime contradictory (there are lots of implementations) things that need to be sorted out by experiment before we start quoting them like fact.</p><p>Further Reading:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable\_isotope" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable\_isotope</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_elements\_by\_nuclear\_stability" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_elements\_by\_nuclear\_stability</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton\_decay" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton\_decay</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the nuclei of elements below ( and including ) lead are infinitely stable * * * -- you would have to input energy to break those nuclei apart .
Be grateful for this -- this allows the sun to generate energy from 4H- &gt; He -- that reaction is downhill in energy , albeit with a huge activation barrier.If all elements decayed into hydrogen , nuclear fusion would be impossible and the universe would be a colder , darker place than it already is .
* That is , there exists at least one infinitely-stable isotope for that element , for those that want to quibble .
* * According to all proven physics ( e.g .
the Standard Model -- you do n't get a name like that without being pretty well hashed out ) .
String theory suggests the decay of the proton , which might change this .
On the other hand , string theory suggests all kinds of wacky and sometime contradictory ( there are lots of implementations ) things that need to be sorted out by experiment before we start quoting them like fact.Further Reading : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable \ _isotope [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List \ _of \ _elements \ _by \ _nuclear \ _stability [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton \ _decay [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the nuclei of elements below (and including) lead are infinitely stable* ** -- you would have to input energy to break those nuclei apart.
Be grateful for this -- this allows the sun to generate energy from 4H-&gt;He -- that reaction is downhill in energy, albeit with a huge activation barrier.If all elements decayed into hydrogen, nuclear fusion would be impossible and the universe would be a colder, darker place than it already is.
* That is, there exists at least one infinitely-stable isotope for that element, for those that want to quibble.
** According to all proven physics (e.g.
the Standard Model -- you don't get a name like that without being pretty well hashed out).
String theory suggests the decay of the proton, which might change this.
On the other hand, string theory suggests all kinds of wacky and sometime contradictory (there are lots of implementations) things that need to be sorted out by experiment before we start quoting them like fact.Further Reading:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable\_isotope [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_elements\_by\_nuclear\_stability [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton\_decay [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300367</id>
	<title>Re:Bushonium</title>
	<author>niktemadur</author>
	<datestamp>1244715060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>After Obama's gutting the space budget, honoring Bush's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea.</i></p><p>Oh boy, here I go on an offtopic rant, but:<br>Stem cell research, anyone?  I don't mean to be facetious and there's nothing I love more than space research and exploration, but there's no comparison here.</p><p>Whereas Bush pulled the plug on much scientific activity due to a misguided sense of faith, Obama is trying to be pragmatic about it while being handed an ideology-driven mess of historic proportions.  I can't wrap my head around trying to balance the national budget as corrupt and incompetent crony corporations are collapsing and being bailed out, the inherited foreign policy is a bottomless money pit and economists like Paul Krugman are warning that the economic stimulus is <i>too small</i>.</p><p>Look at this <a href="http://awesome.goodmagazine.com/transparency/web/0906/trans0609largestbankruptcies.html" title="goodmagazine.com">fucked up graph</a> [goodmagazine.com] and ask yourself where does the money come from.  This is not Obama doing things that displease me on a gut level, this is Obama dealing with a clusterfuck many of us witnessed with horror during eight eternal years.  Add to this the current weak-spined Democrat-led Congress (where much of the national budget is formulated) caving in to demands of a loud minority of ignorant Republicans left over from the electoral massacre of 2008... it doesn't look good, does it, doctor?</p><p>Things were FUBAR long before Obama arrived on the scene, give the man time.  The silver lining for the NASA debacle (let's face it, a broken system since the waning days of the Apollo project) is that it may rise from the ashes as a faster, leaner and meaner entity, or a new one altogether!  Birthing pains, phasing out the bloated old political Space Shuttle (lots of employees, alas), making circumstances flexible enough (finally!) for a flotilla of smaller and cheaper spaceships able to take off and land horizontally, with technology that exists on the shelves (scramjet, etc).  Once the painful transition is made, the industry (and employment) will bloom into levels never before seen.</p><p>To wrap my rant in a nutshell, I deeply hope that besides pragmatism, Obama also has long term vision here, as opposed to giving priority to the social/political bottom line on a trimester by trimester basis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After Obama 's gutting the space budget , honoring Bush 's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea.Oh boy , here I go on an offtopic rant , but : Stem cell research , anyone ?
I do n't mean to be facetious and there 's nothing I love more than space research and exploration , but there 's no comparison here.Whereas Bush pulled the plug on much scientific activity due to a misguided sense of faith , Obama is trying to be pragmatic about it while being handed an ideology-driven mess of historic proportions .
I ca n't wrap my head around trying to balance the national budget as corrupt and incompetent crony corporations are collapsing and being bailed out , the inherited foreign policy is a bottomless money pit and economists like Paul Krugman are warning that the economic stimulus is too small.Look at this fucked up graph [ goodmagazine.com ] and ask yourself where does the money come from .
This is not Obama doing things that displease me on a gut level , this is Obama dealing with a clusterfuck many of us witnessed with horror during eight eternal years .
Add to this the current weak-spined Democrat-led Congress ( where much of the national budget is formulated ) caving in to demands of a loud minority of ignorant Republicans left over from the electoral massacre of 2008... it does n't look good , does it , doctor ? Things were FUBAR long before Obama arrived on the scene , give the man time .
The silver lining for the NASA debacle ( let 's face it , a broken system since the waning days of the Apollo project ) is that it may rise from the ashes as a faster , leaner and meaner entity , or a new one altogether !
Birthing pains , phasing out the bloated old political Space Shuttle ( lots of employees , alas ) , making circumstances flexible enough ( finally !
) for a flotilla of smaller and cheaper spaceships able to take off and land horizontally , with technology that exists on the shelves ( scramjet , etc ) .
Once the painful transition is made , the industry ( and employment ) will bloom into levels never before seen.To wrap my rant in a nutshell , I deeply hope that besides pragmatism , Obama also has long term vision here , as opposed to giving priority to the social/political bottom line on a trimester by trimester basis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After Obama's gutting the space budget, honoring Bush's scientific enlightenment is starting to sound like a good idea.Oh boy, here I go on an offtopic rant, but:Stem cell research, anyone?
I don't mean to be facetious and there's nothing I love more than space research and exploration, but there's no comparison here.Whereas Bush pulled the plug on much scientific activity due to a misguided sense of faith, Obama is trying to be pragmatic about it while being handed an ideology-driven mess of historic proportions.
I can't wrap my head around trying to balance the national budget as corrupt and incompetent crony corporations are collapsing and being bailed out, the inherited foreign policy is a bottomless money pit and economists like Paul Krugman are warning that the economic stimulus is too small.Look at this fucked up graph [goodmagazine.com] and ask yourself where does the money come from.
This is not Obama doing things that displease me on a gut level, this is Obama dealing with a clusterfuck many of us witnessed with horror during eight eternal years.
Add to this the current weak-spined Democrat-led Congress (where much of the national budget is formulated) caving in to demands of a loud minority of ignorant Republicans left over from the electoral massacre of 2008... it doesn't look good, does it, doctor?Things were FUBAR long before Obama arrived on the scene, give the man time.
The silver lining for the NASA debacle (let's face it, a broken system since the waning days of the Apollo project) is that it may rise from the ashes as a faster, leaner and meaner entity, or a new one altogether!
Birthing pains, phasing out the bloated old political Space Shuttle (lots of employees, alas), making circumstances flexible enough (finally!
) for a flotilla of smaller and cheaper spaceships able to take off and land horizontally, with technology that exists on the shelves (scramjet, etc).
Once the painful transition is made, the industry (and employment) will bloom into levels never before seen.To wrap my rant in a nutshell, I deeply hope that besides pragmatism, Obama also has long term vision here, as opposed to giving priority to the social/political bottom line on a trimester by trimester basis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295503</id>
	<title>Come on...</title>
	<author>Amazing Quantum Man</author>
	<datestamp>1244741280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone knows that the most useful element is Ducttapium!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows that the most useful element is Ducttapium !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows that the most useful element is Ducttapium!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294129</id>
	<title>How about "Frank"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, just imagine: "...Meitnerium, Darmstadtium, Roentgerium and... Frank"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , just imagine : " ...Meitnerium , Darmstadtium , Roentgerium and... Frank "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, just imagine: "...Meitnerium, Darmstadtium, Roentgerium and... Frank"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295851</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Celeste R</author>
	<datestamp>1244742480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An atom with a half-life can still bind with other atoms, and an atom with a common half-life doesn't necessarily have to have a half-life at all.  The fact that each atom binds to other atoms differently is important, and that's why it's catalogued in the Periodic Table.</p><p>As has been observed in the past, an isotope can actually be stable, where the more common variant isn't.</p><p>You, sir, are misinformed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An atom with a half-life can still bind with other atoms , and an atom with a common half-life does n't necessarily have to have a half-life at all .
The fact that each atom binds to other atoms differently is important , and that 's why it 's catalogued in the Periodic Table.As has been observed in the past , an isotope can actually be stable , where the more common variant is n't.You , sir , are misinformed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An atom with a half-life can still bind with other atoms, and an atom with a common half-life doesn't necessarily have to have a half-life at all.
The fact that each atom binds to other atoms differently is important, and that's why it's catalogued in the Periodic Table.As has been observed in the past, an isotope can actually be stable, where the more common variant isn't.You, sir, are misinformed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294091</id>
	<title>the discovery was announced at a meeting</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1244736240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in a large hall previously devoted to gymnastics</p><p>so i propose gymnasium, auditorium, or symposium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in a large hall previously devoted to gymnasticsso i propose gymnasium , auditorium , or symposium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in a large hall previously devoted to gymnasticsso i propose gymnasium, auditorium, or symposium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294477</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how do you define an element? Half-life of one minute? What natural distinction does that represent? If you put the right nucleons together and the strong force grabs them, I'd say it quacks like an element.</p><p>rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how do you define an element ?
Half-life of one minute ?
What natural distinction does that represent ?
If you put the right nucleons together and the strong force grabs them , I 'd say it quacks like an element.rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how do you define an element?
Half-life of one minute?
What natural distinction does that represent?
If you put the right nucleons together and the strong force grabs them, I'd say it quacks like an element.rj</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294875</id>
	<title>Re:Serious Question: Why do Germans outperform?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244739120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't answer the "Germans vs everyone else" question, but as for Africa, it's theorized that the closer to the equator a country is, the less innovative it is. Maybe that hot sun makes people want to sleep through the day and not invent stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't answer the " Germans vs everyone else " question , but as for Africa , it 's theorized that the closer to the equator a country is , the less innovative it is .
Maybe that hot sun makes people want to sleep through the day and not invent stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't answer the "Germans vs everyone else" question, but as for Africa, it's theorized that the closer to the equator a country is, the less innovative it is.
Maybe that hot sun makes people want to sleep through the day and not invent stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295057</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244739840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If proton decay is real, then perhaps hydrogen will decay into a positron and a neutral pion and a free electron. The neutral pion quickly decays into two photons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If proton decay is real , then perhaps hydrogen will decay into a positron and a neutral pion and a free electron .
The neutral pion quickly decays into two photons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If proton decay is real, then perhaps hydrogen will decay into a positron and a neutral pion and a free electron.
The neutral pion quickly decays into two photons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293717</id>
	<title>Re:It's so obvious</title>
	<author>Fast Thick Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1244734860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rhymes with Barium?  That'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rhymes with Barium ?
That 'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rhymes with Barium?
That'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28309115</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244825400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Germans invented the Shamwow...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Germans invented the Shamwow.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Germans invented the Shamwow...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294909</id>
	<title>New school.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1244739300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Goatsecxium.</p><p>No good? OK, how about happyfunium? Do not taunt happyfunium!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goatsecxium.No good ?
OK , how about happyfunium ?
Do not taunt happyfunium !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goatsecxium.No good?
OK, how about happyfunium?
Do not taunt happyfunium!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305321</id>
	<title>Re:Bushonium</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1244798760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ohhh</p><p>How about</p><p>Sarcasium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OhhhHow aboutSarcasium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OhhhHow aboutSarcasium?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28306281</id>
	<title>Since nobody can spell it anyway</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244810880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adnausium</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adnausium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adnausium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298935</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>ricosalomar</author>
	<datestamp>1244753160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304897</id>
	<title>Fibonacci</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you very much for defining the Fibonacci sequence on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you very much for defining the Fibonacci sequence on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you very much for defining the Fibonacci sequence on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303633</id>
	<title>Just do half the world a favor...</title>
	<author>RogueWarrior65</author>
	<datestamp>1244734620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And don't name it Obamium or AlGorium.  GAH!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And do n't name it Obamium or AlGorium .
GAH ! ! ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And don't name it Obamium or AlGorium.
GAH!!!!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300249</id>
	<title>How about Onlyexistsfortwomillisecondsium</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1244714700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about Onlyexistsfortwomillisecondsium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Onlyexistsfortwomillisecondsium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Onlyexistsfortwomillisecondsium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294823</id>
	<title>Re:assuming a trend</title>
	<author>MoldySpore</author>
	<datestamp>1244739000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But then what will they name Element 123?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But then what will they name Element 123 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But then what will they name Element 123?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</id>
	<title>A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A nucleus with a half-life measured in milliseconds or smaller doesn't seem to qualify, at least in my sort of language-to-thought translator, as really as an "element". That word carries with it the connotation of actual material existence which seems incompatible with its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale.</p><p>I freely admit this is a quibble, but this sort of thing bugs me. Yes, IAAP and this rant has no bearing whatsoever on the scientific merits of the research (not my field, so I'll pass on that) and is just about the naming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A nucleus with a half-life measured in milliseconds or smaller does n't seem to qualify , at least in my sort of language-to-thought translator , as really as an " element " .
That word carries with it the connotation of actual material existence which seems incompatible with its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale.I freely admit this is a quibble , but this sort of thing bugs me .
Yes , IAAP and this rant has no bearing whatsoever on the scientific merits of the research ( not my field , so I 'll pass on that ) and is just about the naming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A nucleus with a half-life measured in milliseconds or smaller doesn't seem to qualify, at least in my sort of language-to-thought translator, as really as an "element".
That word carries with it the connotation of actual material existence which seems incompatible with its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale.I freely admit this is a quibble, but this sort of thing bugs me.
Yes, IAAP and this rant has no bearing whatsoever on the scientific merits of the research (not my field, so I'll pass on that) and is just about the naming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961</id>
	<title>Just give up</title>
	<author>dmomo</author>
	<datestamp>1244735820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's going to be something like: BankofAmericaElementium</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going to be something like : BankofAmericaElementium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going to be something like: BankofAmericaElementium</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793</id>
	<title>Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We could name it Jumbonium!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We could name it Jumbonium !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could name it Jumbonium!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294333</id>
	<title>Ununbium</title>
	<author>mr\_stark</author>
	<datestamp>1244737260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the heavy unstable elements already have names derived from their atomic mass, so 112 would be Ununbium</p><p>Its also slap bang in the middle of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island\_of\_stability" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">island of stability</a> [wikipedia.org] most heavy elements are too unstable to last before they decay into smaller elements. 112 Has a half life of 29 seconds, which isnt too bad considering 115 has a half life of 88ms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the heavy unstable elements already have names derived from their atomic mass , so 112 would be UnunbiumIts also slap bang in the middle of the island of stability [ wikipedia.org ] most heavy elements are too unstable to last before they decay into smaller elements .
112 Has a half life of 29 seconds , which isnt too bad considering 115 has a half life of 88ms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the heavy unstable elements already have names derived from their atomic mass, so 112 would be UnunbiumIts also slap bang in the middle of the island of stability [wikipedia.org] most heavy elements are too unstable to last before they decay into smaller elements.
112 Has a half life of 29 seconds, which isnt too bad considering 115 has a half life of 88ms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301721</id>
	<title>Re:assuming a trend</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1244720460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yourmomspasswordium</htmltext>
<tokenext>yourmomspasswordium</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yourmomspasswordium</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296623</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And during that 1 millisecond that the atom existed for, your computer executed 3 million instructions (maybe more if it happens to be a quad-core).</p><p>Why should we limit ourselves to the time dimension though?<br>A single atom of anything is too small for you to measure.  So, since you can't see hydrogen or oxygen atoms, does that mean they don't exist?<br>Clearly, they are too small to qualify as an "element" since that word carries the connotation of a building block (like a brick, for instance).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And during that 1 millisecond that the atom existed for , your computer executed 3 million instructions ( maybe more if it happens to be a quad-core ) .Why should we limit ourselves to the time dimension though ? A single atom of anything is too small for you to measure .
So , since you ca n't see hydrogen or oxygen atoms , does that mean they do n't exist ? Clearly , they are too small to qualify as an " element " since that word carries the connotation of a building block ( like a brick , for instance ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And during that 1 millisecond that the atom existed for, your computer executed 3 million instructions (maybe more if it happens to be a quad-core).Why should we limit ourselves to the time dimension though?A single atom of anything is too small for you to measure.
So, since you can't see hydrogen or oxygen atoms, does that mean they don't exist?Clearly, they are too small to qualify as an "element" since that word carries the connotation of a building block (like a brick, for instance).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300011</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>rbrausse</author>
	<datestamp>1244713920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Einstein was from Austria by the way</p><p>Switzerland btw<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Einstein was from Austria by the waySwitzerland btw : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Einstein was from Austria by the waySwitzerland btw :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28402211</id>
	<title>Re:So your obviously a racist troll, but anyway...</title>
	<author>Shoe Puppet</author>
	<datestamp>1245515940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Einstein was from Austria by the way.</p></div><p>He was from Germany, only later he moved to switzerland.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Einstein was from Austria by the way.He was from Germany , only later he moved to switzerland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Einstein was from Austria by the way.He was from Germany, only later he moved to switzerland.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296785</id>
	<title>Keep it in theme</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1244745900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After they named one element they discovered -Hassium- after the state where they are, and another -Darmstadtium- after their city, why not another after a castle nearby -Frankensteinium-</htmltext>
<tokenext>After they named one element they discovered -Hassium- after the state where they are , and another -Darmstadtium- after their city , why not another after a castle nearby -Frankensteinium-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After they named one element they discovered -Hassium- after the state where they are, and another -Darmstadtium- after their city, why not another after a castle nearby -Frankensteinium-</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294525</id>
	<title>Re:A semantic quibble about these things (rant?)</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1244737920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale</i>
<br> <br>
That makes no sense, why would it need to exist on the "human scale" to actually exist? Most of physics doesn't work on the human scale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale That makes no sense , why would it need to exist on the " human scale " to actually exist ?
Most of physics does n't work on the human scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its inability to actually exist for any period of time on the human scale
 
That makes no sense, why would it need to exist on the "human scale" to actually exist?
Most of physics doesn't work on the human scale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302781</id>
	<title>Re:Emergentium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244726940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but only in the UK since they privatized their emergency system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but only in the UK since they privatized their emergency system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but only in the UK since they privatized their emergency system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294163</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1244736480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good News Everyone! (Score:1)<br>by strength\_of\_10\_men (967050) on Thursday June 11, <b>@09:46AM</b> (#28293783)<br>They've found the Jumbonium that I've misplaced!</p><p>---</p><p>Good news everybody! (Score:2)<br>by Bozzio (183974) on Thursday June 11, <b>@09:46AM</b> (#28293793)<br>We could name it Jumbonium!</p><p>---</p><p>Scary...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good News Everyone !
( Score : 1 ) by strength \ _of \ _10 \ _men ( 967050 ) on Thursday June 11 , @ 09 : 46AM ( # 28293783 ) They 've found the Jumbonium that I 've misplaced ! ---Good news everybody !
( Score : 2 ) by Bozzio ( 183974 ) on Thursday June 11 , @ 09 : 46AM ( # 28293793 ) We could name it Jumbonium ! ---Scary.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good News Everyone!
(Score:1)by strength\_of\_10\_men (967050) on Thursday June 11, @09:46AM (#28293783)They've found the Jumbonium that I've misplaced!---Good news everybody!
(Score:2)by Bozzio (183974) on Thursday June 11, @09:46AM (#28293793)We could name it Jumbonium!---Scary...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294287</id>
	<title>Has nobody considered...</title>
	<author>NetRanger</author>
	<datestamp>1244737080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cowboynealium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cowboynealium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cowboynealium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297175</id>
	<title>Re:What have the Africans ever done for us?</title>
	<author>XcepticZP</author>
	<datestamp>1244747160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh boy you made me chuckle with that post. I'm not sure if you're trying to be sarcastic with that post or not. Some of those are pretty far fetched.
<br> <br>
Post a citation for your funky post when you wake up from lala land, buddy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh boy you made me chuckle with that post .
I 'm not sure if you 're trying to be sarcastic with that post or not .
Some of those are pretty far fetched .
Post a citation for your funky post when you wake up from lala land , buddy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh boy you made me chuckle with that post.
I'm not sure if you're trying to be sarcastic with that post or not.
Some of those are pretty far fetched.
Post a citation for your funky post when you wake up from lala land, buddy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299389
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296519
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28402211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28312307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28309115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1349247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296519
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294823
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301721
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295503
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296667
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294949
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294701
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302781
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299389
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294179
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298043
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296785
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293783
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294251
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295171
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295817
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295057
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295851
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294333
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28293841
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294393
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304857
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301781
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296341
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297973
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300931
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28297175
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295979
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299647
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28299871
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28303289
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302257
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294963
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296989
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28298935
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28295505
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28300011
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28312307
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28301909
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28402211
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28305041
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28304895
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302719
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28309115
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28302911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28294875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1349247.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1349247.28296115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
