<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_10_1614227</id>
	<title>Online Vigilantes, Or "Crowdsourced Justice"</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244654040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.destinyland.org/" rel="nofollow">destinyland</a> writes <i>"The Chinese credit the 'human flesh search engine' for <a href="http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/politics/search-and-destroy-engines">successfully locating 'the kitten killer of Hangzhou'</a> from clues in her online video. But in February, the same force identified a teenage cat-abuser in Oklahoma &mdash; within 24 hours of his video's appearance on YouTube. 'Netizens are the new Jack Bauer,' argues one science writer, and with three billion potential detectives, 'attempts to hide will only add thrill to the chase.' But China's vigilantes ultimately turned their attention to China's Internet Propaganda Office, <a href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/01/internet-censor-official-targeted-by-chinese-netizens/">bypassing censorship</a> of a director's personal information using
social networks, including Twitter. The author suggests there's a new principle emerging in the online world: 'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " The Chinese credit the 'human flesh search engine ' for successfully locating 'the kitten killer of Hangzhou ' from clues in her online video .
But in February , the same force identified a teenage cat-abuser in Oklahoma    within 24 hours of his video 's appearance on YouTube .
'Netizens are the new Jack Bauer, ' argues one science writer , and with three billion potential detectives , 'attempts to hide will only add thrill to the chase .
' But China 's vigilantes ultimately turned their attention to China 's Internet Propaganda Office , bypassing censorship of a director 's personal information using social networks , including Twitter .
The author suggests there 's a new principle emerging in the online world : 'The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever. ' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "The Chinese credit the 'human flesh search engine' for successfully locating 'the kitten killer of Hangzhou' from clues in her online video.
But in February, the same force identified a teenage cat-abuser in Oklahoma — within 24 hours of his video's appearance on YouTube.
'Netizens are the new Jack Bauer,' argues one science writer, and with three billion potential detectives, 'attempts to hide will only add thrill to the chase.
' But China's vigilantes ultimately turned their attention to China's Internet Propaganda Office, bypassing censorship of a director's personal information using
social networks, including Twitter.
The author suggests there's a new principle emerging in the online world: 'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever.'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1244660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?</p><p><a href="http://www.northcountrygazette.org/2009/05/20/viriginia\_rape/" title="northcountrygazette.org" rel="nofollow">DNA Testing Clears Virginia Man Of 1984 Rape</a> [northcountrygazette.org]<br><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-wrongly-convicted-rapemay27,0,6172355.story" title="chicagotribune.com" rel="nofollow">Chicago man sues Chicago, police over wrongful conviction</a> [chicagotribune.com]<br><a href="http://wcco.com/wireapnewsfwi/Milwaukee.County.district.2.1033200.html" title="wcco.com" rel="nofollow">Milwaukee DA Drops Charge In 1995 Murder Case</a> [wcco.com]<br><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jczef\_PwC9ELgd9jdYC8WvtUsTdQD98E8NGG0" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Tests prove innocence of 23-year prisoner in Texas</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://www.kxxv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10467431" title="kxxv.com" rel="nofollow">New arson analysis may free convicted murderer</a> [kxxv.com]<br><a href="http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june032009/texas\_innocence\_5-30-09.php" title="salem-news.com" rel="nofollow">Texas Enacts 'Innocence Committee' Over Excessive Wrongful Convictions</a> [salem-news.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake ? DNA Testing Clears Virginia Man Of 1984 Rape [ northcountrygazette.org ] Chicago man sues Chicago , police over wrongful conviction [ chicagotribune.com ] Milwaukee DA Drops Charge In 1995 Murder Case [ wcco.com ] Tests prove innocence of 23-year prisoner in Texas [ google.com ] New arson analysis may free convicted murderer [ kxxv.com ] Texas Enacts 'Innocence Committee ' Over Excessive Wrongful Convictions [ salem-news.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?DNA Testing Clears Virginia Man Of 1984 Rape [northcountrygazette.org]Chicago man sues Chicago, police over wrongful conviction [chicagotribune.com]Milwaukee DA Drops Charge In 1995 Murder Case [wcco.com]Tests prove innocence of 23-year prisoner in Texas [google.com]New arson analysis may free convicted murderer [kxxv.com]Texas Enacts 'Innocence Committee' Over Excessive Wrongful Convictions [salem-news.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282463</id>
	<title>Did the author just watch The Terminator?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1244660040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like he just watched The Terminator... </p><p><div class="quote"><p>'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever.'</p></div><p>From the movie..</p><blockquote><div><p>That Terminator is out there.<br>It can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with.<br>It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear<br>and it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like he just watched The Terminator... 'The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever.'From the movie..That Terminator is out there.It ca n't be bargained with , it ca n't be reasoned with.It does n't feel pity or remorse or fearand it absolutely will not stop , ever , until you are dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like he just watched The Terminator... 'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever.'From the movie..That Terminator is out there.It can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with.It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fearand it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284995</id>
	<title>I am currently being unjustly harassed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244627100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am currently being unjustly harassed by one of these idiot vigilantes. We squared off over a financial transaction that was ultimately settled but the emotions were not settled on either side. He has brought his vigilante network to bear on harassing me regularly. I can prove I am being harassed. I cannot prove who is doing it...I'm not that good at network forensics. The damage is very minimal, just psychological warfare at this point, although it is escalating lately. I am not a get-even kinda person, below a very high threshold anyway.</p><p>I am appalled that anyone would condone this end run around the law enforcement and judicial system, based only on suspicion and hearsay. Some law enforcement agencies are even encouraging this behavior.</p><p>Wanna get rid of your boss? Just tell one of the more zealous of these jerks that he's a cat torturer, they'll take care of the rest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am currently being unjustly harassed by one of these idiot vigilantes .
We squared off over a financial transaction that was ultimately settled but the emotions were not settled on either side .
He has brought his vigilante network to bear on harassing me regularly .
I can prove I am being harassed .
I can not prove who is doing it...I 'm not that good at network forensics .
The damage is very minimal , just psychological warfare at this point , although it is escalating lately .
I am not a get-even kinda person , below a very high threshold anyway.I am appalled that anyone would condone this end run around the law enforcement and judicial system , based only on suspicion and hearsay .
Some law enforcement agencies are even encouraging this behavior.Wan na get rid of your boss ?
Just tell one of the more zealous of these jerks that he 's a cat torturer , they 'll take care of the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am currently being unjustly harassed by one of these idiot vigilantes.
We squared off over a financial transaction that was ultimately settled but the emotions were not settled on either side.
He has brought his vigilante network to bear on harassing me regularly.
I can prove I am being harassed.
I cannot prove who is doing it...I'm not that good at network forensics.
The damage is very minimal, just psychological warfare at this point, although it is escalating lately.
I am not a get-even kinda person, below a very high threshold anyway.I am appalled that anyone would condone this end run around the law enforcement and judicial system, based only on suspicion and hearsay.
Some law enforcement agencies are even encouraging this behavior.Wanna get rid of your boss?
Just tell one of the more zealous of these jerks that he's a cat torturer, they'll take care of the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The author of the article doesn't get it  </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Fortunately, human flesh search engines don't end the lives of their victims, like the witch-hunts or lynching of the past.</p></div><p>No, they just make it impossible to ever live a normal life ever again.  They ruin your career and alienate your friends and family.  They force you to live through humiliation and shaming every day, often for weeks or months at a time.</p><p>All based on a single, often easily fabricated, piece of evidence.  That isn't justice, it's just a mob being a mob and harrassing other people for the fun of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The author of the article does n't get it Fortunately , human flesh search engines do n't end the lives of their victims , like the witch-hunts or lynching of the past.No , they just make it impossible to ever live a normal life ever again .
They ruin your career and alienate your friends and family .
They force you to live through humiliation and shaming every day , often for weeks or months at a time.All based on a single , often easily fabricated , piece of evidence .
That is n't justice , it 's just a mob being a mob and harrassing other people for the fun of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The author of the article doesn't get it  Fortunately, human flesh search engines don't end the lives of their victims, like the witch-hunts or lynching of the past.No, they just make it impossible to ever live a normal life ever again.
They ruin your career and alienate your friends and family.
They force you to live through humiliation and shaming every day, often for weeks or months at a time.All based on a single, often easily fabricated, piece of evidence.
That isn't justice, it's just a mob being a mob and harrassing other people for the fun of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281959</id>
	<title>Yay for Anon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So are you saying that we should embrace 4chan and Anon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So are you saying that we should embrace 4chan and Anon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So are you saying that we should embrace 4chan and Anon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288973</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244651880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Animal torturers deserve nothing less than death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Animal torturers deserve nothing less than death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Animal torturers deserve nothing less than death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283649</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244665080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I will not finish that meme.</p><p>"The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever."</p><p>And it's incredibly stupid and totally uninformed, just like every other lynch mob since long before the kristallnacht and the witch-hunt.</p><p>What could possibly go wrong...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I will not finish that meme .
" The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever. " And it 's incredibly stupid and totally uninformed , just like every other lynch mob since long before the kristallnacht and the witch-hunt.What could possibly go wrong... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I will not finish that meme.
"The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever."And it's incredibly stupid and totally uninformed, just like every other lynch mob since long before the kristallnacht and the witch-hunt.What could possibly go wrong...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284607</id>
	<title>Re:Democracy vs a Republic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244625660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But before you look at history, look at the post I've quoted and check for spelling mistakes. </p><p>Then decide if it is worth looking at the history this character talks about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But before you look at history , look at the post I 've quoted and check for spelling mistakes .
Then decide if it is worth looking at the history this character talks about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But before you look at history, look at the post I've quoted and check for spelling mistakes.
Then decide if it is worth looking at the history this character talks about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282365</id>
	<title>Re:The Author</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it sounds a lot like Anonymous to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it sounds a lot like Anonymous to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it sounds a lot like Anonymous to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284179</id>
	<title>Re:NSFW link.</title>
	<author>Thaelon</author>
	<datestamp>1244667180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought it was a communist version of youtube!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought it was a communist version of youtube !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought it was a communist version of youtube!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281993</id>
	<title>Netizens are the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1244658120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except online vigilantes go after the softest of soft targets.</p><p>And why cats? Sounds like the Chinese version of btards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except online vigilantes go after the softest of soft targets.And why cats ?
Sounds like the Chinese version of btards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except online vigilantes go after the softest of soft targets.And why cats?
Sounds like the Chinese version of btards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287221</id>
	<title>Re:NSFW link.</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1244638020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>RedTube is basically YouTube for Porn</p></div></blockquote><p>Copyright violations and all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>RedTube is basically YouTube for PornCopyright violations and all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RedTube is basically YouTube for PornCopyright violations and all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282883</id>
	<title>"Crowdsourced Justice"?!</title>
	<author>Gravis Zero</author>
	<datestamp>1244661900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Crowdsourced Justice" is just a pretty name for mob justice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Crowdsourced Justice " is just a pretty name for mob justice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Crowdsourced Justice" is just a pretty name for mob justice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285007</id>
	<title>Re:Democracy vs a Republic</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1244627160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean a representative democracy, a republic is only defined as not having a monarch and can be anything from a fascist dictatorship to a direct democracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean a representative democracy , a republic is only defined as not having a monarch and can be anything from a fascist dictatorship to a direct democracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean a representative democracy, a republic is only defined as not having a monarch and can be anything from a fascist dictatorship to a direct democracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293973</id>
	<title>Re:NSFW link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>More generally, <a href="http://www.ovguide.com/" title="ovguide.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ovguide.com/</a> [ovguide.com]  (NSFW after you click the adult button at the bottom of the list on the left) links to many more redtube like sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More generally , http : //www.ovguide.com/ [ ovguide.com ] ( NSFW after you click the adult button at the bottom of the list on the left ) links to many more redtube like sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More generally, http://www.ovguide.com/ [ovguide.com]  (NSFW after you click the adult button at the bottom of the list on the left) links to many more redtube like sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283021</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1244662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?</p></div><p>The police and the rest of the criminal justice system are bound by rules designed to at least <i>attempt</i> to "get it right". The crowd is not. The crowd <i>will</i> make more serious mistakes more frequently than the criminal justice system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake ? The police and the rest of the criminal justice system are bound by rules designed to at least attempt to " get it right " .
The crowd is not .
The crowd will make more serious mistakes more frequently than the criminal justice system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?The police and the rest of the criminal justice system are bound by rules designed to at least attempt to "get it right".
The crowd is not.
The crowd will make more serious mistakes more frequently than the criminal justice system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282173</id>
	<title>china and cats... too bad they do not protest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the Olympics in China and how they rounded up stray cats to be used for<br>meat or sent to death camps on the edge of the cities? Where was the internet justice<br>mob in China to protest that enmasse? Oh... It was the government and therefore too<br>hard a target to take on. Yet a girl kills a cat in China and is hunted down by this mob<br>of internet citizens.</p><p>(I am a proud person owned by a Siamese cat named Salem).</p><p>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-528694/Olympics-clean-Chinese-style-Inside-Beijings-shocking-death-camp-cats.html<br>http://www.zootoo.com/petnews/chinakillsthousandsofcatsasoly-497</p><p>"BEIJING &#226;" In an attempt to clean-up one of the world's most populous cities before thousands of foreigners flock there for the 2008 Olympic Summer Games, China has begun carrying out the round-up, and extermination of thousands of cats.</p><p>UK newspaper Daily Mail reported that the animals are being brought to government &#226;oedeath camps&#226; where without food, water or health care they die of starvation and disease.</p><p>According to the reports, a Chinese government campaign has told Beijing residents to beware of stray and feral cats, as they may carry disease &#226;" even attributing the spread of SARS in 2003 partially to the animals.</p><p>One result of the campaign has been mild hysteria, in one case two concerned kindergarten teachers were so afraid of potential illness reaching their students that they killed six stray felines by beating them to death with sticks."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the Olympics in China and how they rounded up stray cats to be used formeat or sent to death camps on the edge of the cities ?
Where was the internet justicemob in China to protest that enmasse ?
Oh... It was the government and therefore toohard a target to take on .
Yet a girl kills a cat in China and is hunted down by this mobof internet citizens .
( I am a proud person owned by a Siamese cat named Salem ) .http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-528694/Olympics-clean-Chinese-style-Inside-Beijings-shocking-death-camp-cats.htmlhttp : //www.zootoo.com/petnews/chinakillsthousandsofcatsasoly-497 " BEIJING   " In an attempt to clean-up one of the world 's most populous cities before thousands of foreigners flock there for the 2008 Olympic Summer Games , China has begun carrying out the round-up , and extermination of thousands of cats.UK newspaper Daily Mail reported that the animals are being brought to government   oedeath camps   where without food , water or health care they die of starvation and disease.According to the reports , a Chinese government campaign has told Beijing residents to beware of stray and feral cats , as they may carry disease   " even attributing the spread of SARS in 2003 partially to the animals.One result of the campaign has been mild hysteria , in one case two concerned kindergarten teachers were so afraid of potential illness reaching their students that they killed six stray felines by beating them to death with sticks .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the Olympics in China and how they rounded up stray cats to be used formeat or sent to death camps on the edge of the cities?
Where was the internet justicemob in China to protest that enmasse?
Oh... It was the government and therefore toohard a target to take on.
Yet a girl kills a cat in China and is hunted down by this mobof internet citizens.
(I am a proud person owned by a Siamese cat named Salem).http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-528694/Olympics-clean-Chinese-style-Inside-Beijings-shocking-death-camp-cats.htmlhttp://www.zootoo.com/petnews/chinakillsthousandsofcatsasoly-497"BEIJING â" In an attempt to clean-up one of the world's most populous cities before thousands of foreigners flock there for the 2008 Olympic Summer Games, China has begun carrying out the round-up, and extermination of thousands of cats.UK newspaper Daily Mail reported that the animals are being brought to government âoedeath campsâ where without food, water or health care they die of starvation and disease.According to the reports, a Chinese government campaign has told Beijing residents to beware of stray and feral cats, as they may carry disease â" even attributing the spread of SARS in 2003 partially to the animals.One result of the campaign has been mild hysteria, in one case two concerned kindergarten teachers were so afraid of potential illness reaching their students that they killed six stray felines by beating them to death with sticks.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282813</id>
	<title>Anonymous</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1244661540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever.'"</p></div></blockquote><p>That line isn't exactly new...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever. ' " That line is n't exactly new... : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever.'"That line isn't exactly new... :P
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why can't it be both? The criminals are indeed stupid for shooting a video of their crime, and even more stupid for posting it on the internet for the world to see. But does their stupidity mean that the faceless masses on the internet can harass them until they lose their jobs or scrawl death threats on their doors? Those stories are nothing more than a return to anarchy and lawlessness dressed up as something noble by the article. The only story with redeeming qualities is when they found the name of an official that was bragging about his ability to censor the internet, but you'll notice the end result of that story wasn't anywhere near as dramatic as the others.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't it be both ?
The criminals are indeed stupid for shooting a video of their crime , and even more stupid for posting it on the internet for the world to see .
But does their stupidity mean that the faceless masses on the internet can harass them until they lose their jobs or scrawl death threats on their doors ?
Those stories are nothing more than a return to anarchy and lawlessness dressed up as something noble by the article .
The only story with redeeming qualities is when they found the name of an official that was bragging about his ability to censor the internet , but you 'll notice the end result of that story was n't anywhere near as dramatic as the others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't it be both?
The criminals are indeed stupid for shooting a video of their crime, and even more stupid for posting it on the internet for the world to see.
But does their stupidity mean that the faceless masses on the internet can harass them until they lose their jobs or scrawl death threats on their doors?
Those stories are nothing more than a return to anarchy and lawlessness dressed up as something noble by the article.
The only story with redeeming qualities is when they found the name of an official that was bragging about his ability to censor the internet, but you'll notice the end result of that story wasn't anywhere near as dramatic as the others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282771</id>
	<title>but...</title>
	<author>n30na</author>
	<datestamp>1244661300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't we already know about anonymous?  This is just the different face of the same thing.<br> <br>

People already have tendencies for this sort of thing, the internet just lets them work together.  You don't need a very large portion of the internet fighting for your cause to have a force to be reckoned with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't we already know about anonymous ?
This is just the different face of the same thing .
People already have tendencies for this sort of thing , the internet just lets them work together .
You do n't need a very large portion of the internet fighting for your cause to have a force to be reckoned with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't we already know about anonymous?
This is just the different face of the same thing.
People already have tendencies for this sort of thing, the internet just lets them work together.
You don't need a very large portion of the internet fighting for your cause to have a force to be reckoned with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289817</id>
	<title>Re:Did the author just watch The Terminator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just watched The Terminator! I'm not the author, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just watched The Terminator !
I 'm not the author , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just watched The Terminator!
I'm not the author, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288439</id>
	<title>Think it through...</title>
	<author>joebagodonuts</author>
	<datestamp>1244646960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system.</p></div><p>That applies to ANY system, including the traditional legal ones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system.That applies to ANY system , including the traditional legal ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system.That applies to ANY system, including the traditional legal ones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867</id>
	<title>So the Internet is like....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244657760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...the Terminator of electronic communication tools?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the Terminator of electronic communication tools ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the Terminator of electronic communication tools?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284215</id>
	<title>Re:Mob Mentality and Internet Rabble-Rousing</title>
	<author>jafiwam</author>
	<datestamp>1244667360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[Tongue In Cheek]<br><br>Please stop with the christian bashing.<br><br>[/Tongue In Cheek]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Tongue In Cheek ] Please stop with the christian bashing .
[ /Tongue In Cheek ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Tongue In Cheek]Please stop with the christian bashing.
[/Tongue In Cheek]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282505</id>
	<title>Please Detain This Dangerous Person +1, True</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for <a href="http://whitehouse.georgewbush.org/administration/dick.asp" title="georgewbush.org" rel="nofollow">un-American activities</a> [georgewbush.org]</p><p>Yours In Peace,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for un-American activities [ georgewbush.org ] Yours In Peace,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for un-American activities [georgewbush.org]Yours In Peace,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283255</id>
	<title>Re:Grace Wang</title>
	<author>Zontar\_Thing\_From\_Ve</author>
	<datestamp>1244663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>it is not a good thing.</i></p><p><i>
I'm sure <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/17student.html" title="nytimes.com">Grace Wang</a> [nytimes.com] would agree with you. </i> <br> <br>

Thank you for posting this.  This is a perfect example of how Chinese groupthink works.  <br> <br>

I don't have a link, but I remember reading an article where an angry ex-wife put some false allegations about her ex-husband online (this was also in China) and the guy ended up being constantly harassed until the government stepped in and protected him and put the ex-wife in jail for lying.  I've heard of similar stories happening with "online justice" in South Korea where people just believe whatever horrible thing someone says online about another person. <br> <br>

What really bothers me about China is that many young people there seem to have this patriotic fervor that's based in nothing more than believing what the government tells them.  I would be shocked if someone asked Chinese students why they are so angry about Taiwanese independence or Tibetan independence (or even autonomy) and that had anything to say beyond "They are now and always have been part of China".  I've been to Taiwan and except for a few crazy pro-independence nut jobs, most people there just want to be left alone by China and nothing more than that.  They don't wish any ill on China, they just want to be left alone.  It seems to me that the Chinese government actually likes to encourage this irrational "Everything we say and do is right" attitude.  It makes the population easier to control when they are incapable of independent thought.  <br> <br>

Finally I read the original article and I found some aspects troubling.  First of all, some people figured out where the kitten killing in China occurred by recognizing things in the video.  No problem them.  But then it says that someone recognized the shoes the girl wore and knew they were ordered online.  OK, maybe these shoes are only available online and someone knew that.  Fine.  But then it says that they figured out who ordered them and went after her.  Hmm... serious lack of privacy here.  So it's not the government asking the business to see who did this but just an angry mob and the company apparently gave them the info.  What?  Was there only one woman who ordered the shoes?  So how on earth from this paltry information did they figure out who did it?  I don't know.  It sounds kind of fishy to me but if true, I guess it says a lot about China that all you have to do is get an angry mob and businesses will give out all your personal info to them.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is not a good thing .
I 'm sure Grace Wang [ nytimes.com ] would agree with you .
Thank you for posting this .
This is a perfect example of how Chinese groupthink works .
I do n't have a link , but I remember reading an article where an angry ex-wife put some false allegations about her ex-husband online ( this was also in China ) and the guy ended up being constantly harassed until the government stepped in and protected him and put the ex-wife in jail for lying .
I 've heard of similar stories happening with " online justice " in South Korea where people just believe whatever horrible thing someone says online about another person .
What really bothers me about China is that many young people there seem to have this patriotic fervor that 's based in nothing more than believing what the government tells them .
I would be shocked if someone asked Chinese students why they are so angry about Taiwanese independence or Tibetan independence ( or even autonomy ) and that had anything to say beyond " They are now and always have been part of China " .
I 've been to Taiwan and except for a few crazy pro-independence nut jobs , most people there just want to be left alone by China and nothing more than that .
They do n't wish any ill on China , they just want to be left alone .
It seems to me that the Chinese government actually likes to encourage this irrational " Everything we say and do is right " attitude .
It makes the population easier to control when they are incapable of independent thought .
Finally I read the original article and I found some aspects troubling .
First of all , some people figured out where the kitten killing in China occurred by recognizing things in the video .
No problem them .
But then it says that someone recognized the shoes the girl wore and knew they were ordered online .
OK , maybe these shoes are only available online and someone knew that .
Fine. But then it says that they figured out who ordered them and went after her .
Hmm... serious lack of privacy here .
So it 's not the government asking the business to see who did this but just an angry mob and the company apparently gave them the info .
What ? Was there only one woman who ordered the shoes ?
So how on earth from this paltry information did they figure out who did it ?
I do n't know .
It sounds kind of fishy to me but if true , I guess it says a lot about China that all you have to do is get an angry mob and businesses will give out all your personal info to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> it is not a good thing.
I'm sure Grace Wang [nytimes.com] would agree with you.
Thank you for posting this.
This is a perfect example of how Chinese groupthink works.
I don't have a link, but I remember reading an article where an angry ex-wife put some false allegations about her ex-husband online (this was also in China) and the guy ended up being constantly harassed until the government stepped in and protected him and put the ex-wife in jail for lying.
I've heard of similar stories happening with "online justice" in South Korea where people just believe whatever horrible thing someone says online about another person.
What really bothers me about China is that many young people there seem to have this patriotic fervor that's based in nothing more than believing what the government tells them.
I would be shocked if someone asked Chinese students why they are so angry about Taiwanese independence or Tibetan independence (or even autonomy) and that had anything to say beyond "They are now and always have been part of China".
I've been to Taiwan and except for a few crazy pro-independence nut jobs, most people there just want to be left alone by China and nothing more than that.
They don't wish any ill on China, they just want to be left alone.
It seems to me that the Chinese government actually likes to encourage this irrational "Everything we say and do is right" attitude.
It makes the population easier to control when they are incapable of independent thought.
Finally I read the original article and I found some aspects troubling.
First of all, some people figured out where the kitten killing in China occurred by recognizing things in the video.
No problem them.
But then it says that someone recognized the shoes the girl wore and knew they were ordered online.
OK, maybe these shoes are only available online and someone knew that.
Fine.  But then it says that they figured out who ordered them and went after her.
Hmm... serious lack of privacy here.
So it's not the government asking the business to see who did this but just an angry mob and the company apparently gave them the info.
What?  Was there only one woman who ordered the shoes?
So how on earth from this paltry information did they figure out who did it?
I don't know.
It sounds kind of fishy to me but if true, I guess it says a lot about China that all you have to do is get an angry mob and businesses will give out all your personal info to them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289283</id>
	<title>I was the guy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244655060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was the (Anonymous Coward) that updated the wikipedia article on the salt pit (the CIA secret prision in Iraq).  My mere contribution was<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....the exact location -longitude and latitude.  Prior to this, there was a satellite photo, but no location given.  It took a bit of searching in google earth, but I found it and posted.  Suddenly the world knew (it was never edited back out).  Since then I've seen hundreds of *touchy* wikipedia articles that have juicy information with lat and long.  And you can find the location in Google earth.  Chinese submarines, Korean rockets, you name it.  I'm not the only one finding and posting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was the ( Anonymous Coward ) that updated the wikipedia article on the salt pit ( the CIA secret prision in Iraq ) .
My mere contribution was ....the exact location -longitude and latitude .
Prior to this , there was a satellite photo , but no location given .
It took a bit of searching in google earth , but I found it and posted .
Suddenly the world knew ( it was never edited back out ) .
Since then I 've seen hundreds of * touchy * wikipedia articles that have juicy information with lat and long .
And you can find the location in Google earth .
Chinese submarines , Korean rockets , you name it .
I 'm not the only one finding and posting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was the (Anonymous Coward) that updated the wikipedia article on the salt pit (the CIA secret prision in Iraq).
My mere contribution was ....the exact location -longitude and latitude.
Prior to this, there was a satellite photo, but no location given.
It took a bit of searching in google earth, but I found it and posted.
Suddenly the world knew (it was never edited back out).
Since then I've seen hundreds of *touchy* wikipedia articles that have juicy information with lat and long.
And you can find the location in Google earth.
Chinese submarines, Korean rockets, you name it.
I'm not the only one finding and posting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</id>
	<title>The Author</title>
	<author>Niris</author>
	<datestamp>1244657880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The author suggests there's a new principle emerging in the online world: 'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever.'""<br> <br>
So the author came up with that? Seriously? Pretty sure that's been a main line (well, at least a version of it) for the groups for a long while.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The author suggests there 's a new principle emerging in the online world : 'The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever. ' " " So the author came up with that ?
Seriously ? Pretty sure that 's been a main line ( well , at least a version of it ) for the groups for a long while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The author suggests there's a new principle emerging in the online world: 'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever.'"" 
So the author came up with that?
Seriously? Pretty sure that's been a main line (well, at least a version of it) for the groups for a long while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283857</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244665920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the lulz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the lulz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the lulz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</id>
	<title>It's great!  ...until...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The crowd makes a mistake and some random dude gets beaten down for something his lookalike neighbour did.<br>Do a news.google.com search for: vilgilante mistake<br>read<br>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1357909/Man-beaten-to-death-by-mistake.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The crowd makes a mistake and some random dude gets beaten down for something his lookalike neighbour did.Do a news.google.com search for : vilgilante mistakereadhttp : //www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1357909/Man-beaten-to-death-by-mistake.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The crowd makes a mistake and some random dude gets beaten down for something his lookalike neighbour did.Do a news.google.com search for: vilgilante mistakereadhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1357909/Man-beaten-to-death-by-mistake.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282625</id>
	<title>Justice according to Wikipedia and Slashdot</title>
	<author>bzzfzz</author>
	<datestamp>1244660760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The outcome ultimately is justice through online voting and consensus systems, like the moderation system here, or the various systems of community sanctions over at Wikipedia.  The problem is not that these systems are unfair, since they are arguably no worse than traditional legal systems (whose track record is far from perfect).  The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The outcome ultimately is justice through online voting and consensus systems , like the moderation system here , or the various systems of community sanctions over at Wikipedia .
The problem is not that these systems are unfair , since they are arguably no worse than traditional legal systems ( whose track record is far from perfect ) .
The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The outcome ultimately is justice through online voting and consensus systems, like the moderation system here, or the various systems of community sanctions over at Wikipedia.
The problem is not that these systems are unfair, since they are arguably no worse than traditional legal systems (whose track record is far from perfect).
The problem is that they are open to manipulation by people who have the willingness and the knowhow to game the system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282849</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244661720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget about also posting to MySpace. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023\_3-10251862-93.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget about also posting to MySpace .
http : //news.cnet.com/8301-1023 \ _3-10251862-93.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget about also posting to MySpace.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023\_3-10251862-93.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282993</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agree.  And the justice system make mistake too, but with due process, hopefully, the number is mistake is reduce.  The due process is just not there with a crowd.  No one want to listen to the person who said "stop hitting him, we got the wrong guy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agree .
And the justice system make mistake too , but with due process , hopefully , the number is mistake is reduce .
The due process is just not there with a crowd .
No one want to listen to the person who said " stop hitting him , we got the wrong guy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agree.
And the justice system make mistake too, but with due process, hopefully, the number is mistake is reduce.
The due process is just not there with a crowd.
No one want to listen to the person who said "stop hitting him, we got the wrong guy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289243</id>
	<title>Re:Not really the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244654640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The internet" is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics. They just picket different targets. Sure, today it's kitten killers and the Co$. But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to?</p></div><p>Any group I would belong to would be <i>far</i> more defensible than "people who tape themselves torturing animals to death."  As such, I'm utterly unworried about being targeted "by the internet."</p><p>How about you?  Are you honestly worried?  What are you doing that's so sensational that a significant portion of "the internet" would peel themselves away from WoW and Facebook to punish you for?  Unless you're directly and graphically ruining lives, I doubt anyone gives a shit.  (And if you are, you deserve to be targeted.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The internet " is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics .
They just picket different targets .
Sure , today it 's kitten killers and the Co $ .
But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to ? Any group I would belong to would be far more defensible than " people who tape themselves torturing animals to death .
" As such , I 'm utterly unworried about being targeted " by the internet .
" How about you ?
Are you honestly worried ?
What are you doing that 's so sensational that a significant portion of " the internet " would peel themselves away from WoW and Facebook to punish you for ?
Unless you 're directly and graphically ruining lives , I doubt anyone gives a shit .
( And if you are , you deserve to be targeted .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The internet" is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics.
They just picket different targets.
Sure, today it's kitten killers and the Co$.
But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to?Any group I would belong to would be far more defensible than "people who tape themselves torturing animals to death.
"  As such, I'm utterly unworried about being targeted "by the internet.
"How about you?
Are you honestly worried?
What are you doing that's so sensational that a significant portion of "the internet" would peel themselves away from WoW and Facebook to punish you for?
Unless you're directly and graphically ruining lives, I doubt anyone gives a shit.
(And if you are, you deserve to be targeted.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288165</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>Capsaicin</author>
	<datestamp>1244644920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes. Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube.</i> </p><p>Isn't there an issue here that many of these "crimes" are committed explicitly for the purpose of posting a video of it on youtube?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes .
Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube .
Is n't there an issue here that many of these " crimes " are committed explicitly for the purpose of posting a video of it on youtube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes.
Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube.
Isn't there an issue here that many of these "crimes" are committed explicitly for the purpose of posting a video of it on youtube?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282581</id>
	<title>Re:Not really the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>mrex</author>
	<datestamp>1244660580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Internet vigilantes", the kinds who do care about issues like cults and animal abuse, seem little more than pawns for the sociopathic trolls who enjoy nothing more than exerting power over their peers, particularly in ways that elevate their in-group status and justify their innate desire to inflict suffering on those peers.</p><p>"Cult like mentality" is an apt description.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Internet vigilantes " , the kinds who do care about issues like cults and animal abuse , seem little more than pawns for the sociopathic trolls who enjoy nothing more than exerting power over their peers , particularly in ways that elevate their in-group status and justify their innate desire to inflict suffering on those peers .
" Cult like mentality " is an apt description .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Internet vigilantes", the kinds who do care about issues like cults and animal abuse, seem little more than pawns for the sociopathic trolls who enjoy nothing more than exerting power over their peers, particularly in ways that elevate their in-group status and justify their innate desire to inflict suffering on those peers.
"Cult like mentality" is an apt description.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281955</id>
	<title>Ooops.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, this is why you can't trust free speech and open information. One minute it's saving kittens, and then next minute it's BITING YOU IN THE ASS! I can has truth plz? kthnxbye!</p><p>Always nice to see the Chinese circumventing the Great Firewall. There is no way you'll get good information if all you get is government information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , this is why you ca n't trust free speech and open information .
One minute it 's saving kittens , and then next minute it 's BITING YOU IN THE ASS !
I can has truth plz ?
kthnxbye ! Always nice to see the Chinese circumventing the Great Firewall .
There is no way you 'll get good information if all you get is government information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, this is why you can't trust free speech and open information.
One minute it's saving kittens, and then next minute it's BITING YOU IN THE ASS!
I can has truth plz?
kthnxbye!Always nice to see the Chinese circumventing the Great Firewall.
There is no way you'll get good information if all you get is government information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737</id>
	<title>No surprise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't this predicted years ago by Bruce Sterling in <a href="http://tqft.net/wiki/Maneki\_Neko" title="tqft.net" rel="nofollow">Makeki Neko</a> [tqft.net]? Use of the 'net to commit "death by a thousand paper cuts", or harassment by many, many small acts, each of which individually wouldn't be considered unlawful, but in aggregate become overwhelming? I'm not sure whether it is a good thing or a bad thing, but it almost certainly is going to happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this predicted years ago by Bruce Sterling in Makeki Neko [ tqft.net ] ?
Use of the 'net to commit " death by a thousand paper cuts " , or harassment by many , many small acts , each of which individually would n't be considered unlawful , but in aggregate become overwhelming ?
I 'm not sure whether it is a good thing or a bad thing , but it almost certainly is going to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this predicted years ago by Bruce Sterling in Makeki Neko [tqft.net]?
Use of the 'net to commit "death by a thousand paper cuts", or harassment by many, many small acts, each of which individually wouldn't be considered unlawful, but in aggregate become overwhelming?
I'm not sure whether it is a good thing or a bad thing, but it almost certainly is going to happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282703</id>
	<title>Re:So the Internet is like....</title>
	<author>Stealth Captain</author>
	<datestamp>1244661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, <a href="http://www.rackmountparts.com/production/Parts\_PN/bnc\_te.jpg" title="rackmountparts.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [rackmountparts.com] is the terminator of electronic communication tools.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this [ rackmountparts.com ] is the terminator of electronic communication tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this [rackmountparts.com] is the terminator of electronic communication tools.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283085</id>
	<title>Why does that remind me of abortions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, yes, because the same mob-thinking is at work when addresses of clinics, doctors and nurses who do abortions (legally!) get posted to public internet sites and these people get harrassed by lunatics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , yes , because the same mob-thinking is at work when addresses of clinics , doctors and nurses who do abortions ( legally !
) get posted to public internet sites and these people get harrassed by lunatics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, yes, because the same mob-thinking is at work when addresses of clinics, doctors and nurses who do abortions (legally!
) get posted to public internet sites and these people get harrassed by lunatics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282973</id>
	<title>scary</title>
	<author>n30na</author>
	<datestamp>1244662260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If two versus one is rarely a fair fight, what can be said for two million verses one?  It's a scary reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If two versus one is rarely a fair fight , what can be said for two million verses one ?
It 's a scary reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If two versus one is rarely a fair fight, what can be said for two million verses one?
It's a scary reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283217</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1244663340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Easily fabricated? Surely you jest. They recognized backgrounds and shoe styles, then traced it to online accounts to find the kitten killer woman. How in the hell is that in any way "easily fabricated"? The Internet justice movement may be a bunch of vigilantes, but it's very fucking well-informed vigilantes. If something doesn't smell right, someone will say so and there will be a huge discussion of it. I'm much less afraid of Internet vigilantes fabricating shit than I am of my government fabricating evidence of, say, WMDs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Easily fabricated ?
Surely you jest .
They recognized backgrounds and shoe styles , then traced it to online accounts to find the kitten killer woman .
How in the hell is that in any way " easily fabricated " ?
The Internet justice movement may be a bunch of vigilantes , but it 's very fucking well-informed vigilantes .
If something does n't smell right , someone will say so and there will be a huge discussion of it .
I 'm much less afraid of Internet vigilantes fabricating shit than I am of my government fabricating evidence of , say , WMDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easily fabricated?
Surely you jest.
They recognized backgrounds and shoe styles, then traced it to online accounts to find the kitten killer woman.
How in the hell is that in any way "easily fabricated"?
The Internet justice movement may be a bunch of vigilantes, but it's very fucking well-informed vigilantes.
If something doesn't smell right, someone will say so and there will be a huge discussion of it.
I'm much less afraid of Internet vigilantes fabricating shit than I am of my government fabricating evidence of, say, WMDs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241</id>
	<title>Not really the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More like the new mob. It's fine if you fit in, if you agree with whatever "the internet" agrees on. It's utter hell if you don't.</p><p>"The internet" is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics. They just picket different targets. Sure, today it's kitten killers and the Co$. But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to? Will it take a lot to jump from hunting down criminals to hunting down people that dare to be different, that refuse to fit in, that did nothing really wrong but made someone feel "uneasy" thinking of what he does?</p><p>And I'm not even talking about sexual fetishes that make me (and probably a few other people) cringe.</p><p>It's a small step from vigilantism to harassment. From fighting a crime that the justice system ignores to beating people you just don't simply like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More like the new mob .
It 's fine if you fit in , if you agree with whatever " the internet " agrees on .
It 's utter hell if you do n't .
" The internet " is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics .
They just picket different targets .
Sure , today it 's kitten killers and the Co $ .
But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to ?
Will it take a lot to jump from hunting down criminals to hunting down people that dare to be different , that refuse to fit in , that did nothing really wrong but made someone feel " uneasy " thinking of what he does ? And I 'm not even talking about sexual fetishes that make me ( and probably a few other people ) cringe.It 's a small step from vigilantism to harassment .
From fighting a crime that the justice system ignores to beating people you just do n't simply like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like the new mob.
It's fine if you fit in, if you agree with whatever "the internet" agrees on.
It's utter hell if you don't.
"The internet" is not much better than the average religious nutjobs picketing abortion clinics.
They just picket different targets.
Sure, today it's kitten killers and the Co$.
But how long 'til the next groupthink target is a group you belong to?
Will it take a lot to jump from hunting down criminals to hunting down people that dare to be different, that refuse to fit in, that did nothing really wrong but made someone feel "uneasy" thinking of what he does?And I'm not even talking about sexual fetishes that make me (and probably a few other people) cringe.It's a small step from vigilantism to harassment.
From fighting a crime that the justice system ignores to beating people you just don't simply like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283571</id>
	<title>If only...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they would do the same to their government, and make it pay, instead of only complaining in blogs. ^^</p><p>I guess it must be the imagination that many millions of people could not fight some thousands of people, because they would be protected by an army of those very same millions of people.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they would do the same to their government , and make it pay , instead of only complaining in blogs .
^ ^ I guess it must be the imagination that many millions of people could not fight some thousands of people , because they would be protected by an army of those very same millions of people .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they would do the same to their government, and make it pay, instead of only complaining in blogs.
^^I guess it must be the imagination that many millions of people could not fight some thousands of people, because they would be protected by an army of those very same millions of people.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909</id>
	<title>urm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244657820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><br> <i> 'human flesh search engine' </i> <br> <br> <a href="http://www.redtube.com/" title="redtube.com" rel="nofollow">RedTube?</a> [redtube.com]<br> <br>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>'human flesh search engine ' RedTube ?
[ redtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  'human flesh search engine'    RedTube?
[redtube.com] .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283261</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>parlancex</author>
	<datestamp>1244663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vigilante justice is wrong and it isn't hard to prove that, but the instances cited in TFA aren't really about vigilante justice as the summary would suggest. The crowd didn't find these people and punish them, it just found them. They will be subject to the same due process as anybody else accused of a crime (though I can't speak for in China). The trend worth discussing here is more akin to internet detective-work, not internet justice, and I think we can agree that internet detective-work has a stronger case than vigilante justice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vigilante justice is wrong and it is n't hard to prove that , but the instances cited in TFA are n't really about vigilante justice as the summary would suggest .
The crowd did n't find these people and punish them , it just found them .
They will be subject to the same due process as anybody else accused of a crime ( though I ca n't speak for in China ) .
The trend worth discussing here is more akin to internet detective-work , not internet justice , and I think we can agree that internet detective-work has a stronger case than vigilante justice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vigilante justice is wrong and it isn't hard to prove that, but the instances cited in TFA aren't really about vigilante justice as the summary would suggest.
The crowd didn't find these people and punish them, it just found them.
They will be subject to the same due process as anybody else accused of a crime (though I can't speak for in China).
The trend worth discussing here is more akin to internet detective-work, not internet justice, and I think we can agree that internet detective-work has a stronger case than vigilante justice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283435</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1244664180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?</p></div><p>Right of appeal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake ? Right of appeal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?Right of appeal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283029</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>strength\_of\_10\_men</author>
	<datestamp>1244662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?</p></div><p>A Trial and some accountability</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake ? A Trial and some accountability</tokentext>
<sentencetext> So what's the difference between the crowd making a mistale and the police making a mistake?A Trial and some accountability
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28304347</id>
	<title>Re:So the Internet is like....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244740740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The Internet does not forget or forgive and cannot be stopped."  Thats the new fascism right there. Fuck that crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Internet does not forget or forgive and can not be stopped .
" Thats the new fascism right there .
Fuck that crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Internet does not forget or forgive and cannot be stopped.
"  Thats the new fascism right there.
Fuck that crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289139</id>
	<title>Re:Nonsense</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244653440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses (think "Amber alert"), but it is still in control of the investigation.</i></p><p>Amber alerts can lead to the same thing.  A mob can attack a person who's with someone in an Amber Alert as easily as they can someone like this person who stomped on the kitten.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses ( think " Amber alert " ) , but it is still in control of the investigation.Amber alerts can lead to the same thing .
A mob can attack a person who 's with someone in an Amber Alert as easily as they can someone like this person who stomped on the kitten .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses (think "Amber alert"), but it is still in control of the investigation.Amber alerts can lead to the same thing.
A mob can attack a person who's with someone in an Amber Alert as easily as they can someone like this person who stomped on the kitten.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283019</id>
	<title>Yet they do nothing aainst those in true power.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Notice who the victims of justice are: people who have no power. Notice that for all of China's vigilante "might", they are powerless against the people who wield true power, the ruling Communist party. It's one thing to gang up on some weak female, but try doing that against those who control not only tanks, but the very weapon the vigilantes use: the Internet. The vigilante's sword comes with chains attached, not strings.</p><p>This is just the weak mob ganging up on the peasant. They dare not do that to the Emperor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Notice who the victims of justice are : people who have no power .
Notice that for all of China 's vigilante " might " , they are powerless against the people who wield true power , the ruling Communist party .
It 's one thing to gang up on some weak female , but try doing that against those who control not only tanks , but the very weapon the vigilantes use : the Internet .
The vigilante 's sword comes with chains attached , not strings.This is just the weak mob ganging up on the peasant .
They dare not do that to the Emperor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notice who the victims of justice are: people who have no power.
Notice that for all of China's vigilante "might", they are powerless against the people who wield true power, the ruling Communist party.
It's one thing to gang up on some weak female, but try doing that against those who control not only tanks, but the very weapon the vigilantes use: the Internet.
The vigilante's sword comes with chains attached, not strings.This is just the weak mob ganging up on the peasant.
They dare not do that to the Emperor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288333</id>
	<title>China did it first?</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1244645940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It has been suggested that this recent rise in online vigilantism was unique to China</p></div></blockquote><p>
Not at all.</p><blockquote><div><p>China may again have generated a civilization-wide advance in governance.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Again, not at all. Take a look at Encyclopedia Dramatica for numerous stories of online vigilantism, especially in the US. This is definitely not something that started in China or which is unique to China. The story authors are clearly somewhat ignorant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has been suggested that this recent rise in online vigilantism was unique to China Not at all.China may again have generated a civilization-wide advance in governance .
Again , not at all .
Take a look at Encyclopedia Dramatica for numerous stories of online vigilantism , especially in the US .
This is definitely not something that started in China or which is unique to China .
The story authors are clearly somewhat ignorant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has been suggested that this recent rise in online vigilantism was unique to China
Not at all.China may again have generated a civilization-wide advance in governance.
Again, not at all.
Take a look at Encyclopedia Dramatica for numerous stories of online vigilantism, especially in the US.
This is definitely not something that started in China or which is unique to China.
The story authors are clearly somewhat ignorant.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288965</id>
	<title>Nazis did that kind of stuff in the 1930s</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244651820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The NAZIs just played on an undercurrent of antisemitism.  For centuries Jews were discriminated against and harassed.  And they weren't the only ones.  Agnostics, Muslims, Wiccans and other Pagans were as well.  As queen of Castile <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella\_I\_of\_Castile" title="wikipedia.org">Isabella</a> [wikipedia.org], who created a united Spain, demanded that either non-Christians convert to Christianity or leave Spain.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sephardim" title="wikipedia.org">Sephardim</a> [wikipedia.org] or Spanish Jews and Spanish Moors left en mass.  Others such as <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090610131933AAibrzS" title="yahoo.com">Agnostic Christians</a> [yahoo.com] were persecuted or massacred.</p><p>Also it was not the NAZIs' goal to exterminate all Jews, what they wanted was for all Jews to leave Europe, ie the "Final Solution" of the Holocaust when some Jews would not leave.  In 1932-3 the NAZis negotiated with Jewish leaders in Europe wherein those Jews who wanted to leave would be helped by the NAZIs.  The SS and Gestapo even trained Jews.  As part of the negotiations there were two agreements made between Jews and NAZIs, the <a href="http://www.codoh.com/incon/inconhaa.html" title="codoh.com">Haavara Agreement</a> [codoh.com] or Transfer Agreement and the Rublee-Wohlthat-Abkommen.  The first one was an agreement for Jewish emigration to Palestine and the second was to anywhere outside of Europe.  Now with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British\_Mandate\_of\_Palestine" title="wikipedia.org">British Mandate of Palestine</a> [wikipedia.org] the British barred Jews from immigrating to Palestine, thus the NAZI's training of Jews.  Today it's Palestinians who are called terrorists but through the 1930s until the independence of Israel in 1948 it was Jews who were the terrorists.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The NAZIs just played on an undercurrent of antisemitism .
For centuries Jews were discriminated against and harassed .
And they were n't the only ones .
Agnostics , Muslims , Wiccans and other Pagans were as well .
As queen of Castile Isabella [ wikipedia.org ] , who created a united Spain , demanded that either non-Christians convert to Christianity or leave Spain .
Sephardim [ wikipedia.org ] or Spanish Jews and Spanish Moors left en mass .
Others such as Agnostic Christians [ yahoo.com ] were persecuted or massacred.Also it was not the NAZIs ' goal to exterminate all Jews , what they wanted was for all Jews to leave Europe , ie the " Final Solution " of the Holocaust when some Jews would not leave .
In 1932-3 the NAZis negotiated with Jewish leaders in Europe wherein those Jews who wanted to leave would be helped by the NAZIs .
The SS and Gestapo even trained Jews .
As part of the negotiations there were two agreements made between Jews and NAZIs , the Haavara Agreement [ codoh.com ] or Transfer Agreement and the Rublee-Wohlthat-Abkommen .
The first one was an agreement for Jewish emigration to Palestine and the second was to anywhere outside of Europe .
Now with the British Mandate of Palestine [ wikipedia.org ] the British barred Jews from immigrating to Palestine , thus the NAZI 's training of Jews .
Today it 's Palestinians who are called terrorists but through the 1930s until the independence of Israel in 1948 it was Jews who were the terrorists .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NAZIs just played on an undercurrent of antisemitism.
For centuries Jews were discriminated against and harassed.
And they weren't the only ones.
Agnostics, Muslims, Wiccans and other Pagans were as well.
As queen of Castile Isabella [wikipedia.org], who created a united Spain, demanded that either non-Christians convert to Christianity or leave Spain.
Sephardim [wikipedia.org] or Spanish Jews and Spanish Moors left en mass.
Others such as Agnostic Christians [yahoo.com] were persecuted or massacred.Also it was not the NAZIs' goal to exterminate all Jews, what they wanted was for all Jews to leave Europe, ie the "Final Solution" of the Holocaust when some Jews would not leave.
In 1932-3 the NAZis negotiated with Jewish leaders in Europe wherein those Jews who wanted to leave would be helped by the NAZIs.
The SS and Gestapo even trained Jews.
As part of the negotiations there were two agreements made between Jews and NAZIs, the Haavara Agreement [codoh.com] or Transfer Agreement and the Rublee-Wohlthat-Abkommen.
The first one was an agreement for Jewish emigration to Palestine and the second was to anywhere outside of Europe.
Now with the British Mandate of Palestine [wikipedia.org] the British barred Jews from immigrating to Palestine, thus the NAZI's training of Jews.
Today it's Palestinians who are called terrorists but through the 1930s until the independence of Israel in 1948 it was Jews who were the terrorists.
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282105</id>
	<title>Umm...</title>
	<author>SlshSuxs</author>
	<datestamp>1244658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...cannot be stopped"

Unplug it?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but then people may be forced to go outside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...can not be stopped " Unplug it ?
... but then people may be forced to go outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...cannot be stopped"

Unplug it?
... but then people may be forced to go outside.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282623</id>
	<title>Yes, its 4chan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244660760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its called<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its called /b/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its called /b/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283953</id>
	<title>Re:Democracy vs a Republic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244666460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>republics functioned beter then pure democracy</p></div><p>Pure democracy was only ever tried in Greek city-states, and even there the concept was, by modern standards, pretty mangled. Moreover, most people who identify as democrats don't push for "pure democracy", that's just a strawman.</p><p>Trying to juxtapose democracies and republics is arguing apples and oranges. Many if not most republics <i>are</i> democratic. Take the <i>Republic of</i> Finland; a fine welfare state, keeping with (absolutely speaking) rather a democratic system and with a formidable socialist streak.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>republics functioned beter then pure democracyPure democracy was only ever tried in Greek city-states , and even there the concept was , by modern standards , pretty mangled .
Moreover , most people who identify as democrats do n't push for " pure democracy " , that 's just a strawman.Trying to juxtapose democracies and republics is arguing apples and oranges .
Many if not most republics are democratic .
Take the Republic of Finland ; a fine welfare state , keeping with ( absolutely speaking ) rather a democratic system and with a formidable socialist streak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>republics functioned beter then pure democracyPure democracy was only ever tried in Greek city-states, and even there the concept was, by modern standards, pretty mangled.
Moreover, most people who identify as democrats don't push for "pure democracy", that's just a strawman.Trying to juxtapose democracies and republics is arguing apples and oranges.
Many if not most republics are democratic.
Take the Republic of Finland; a fine welfare state, keeping with (absolutely speaking) rather a democratic system and with a formidable socialist streak.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283153</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244663040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's okay.  We'll hunt all those bastards down and MAKE THEM PAY FOR WHAT THEY DID!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's okay .
We 'll hunt all those bastards down and MAKE THEM PAY FOR WHAT THEY DID !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's okay.
We'll hunt all those bastards down and MAKE THEM PAY FOR WHAT THEY DID!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285017</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>sckeener</author>
	<datestamp>1244627160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you forgot the classic documentary:

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Thin\_Blue\_Line\_(documentary)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Thin\_Blue\_Line\_(documentary)</a> [wikipedia.org]<blockquote><div><p>The film concerns the November 28, 1976 murder of Dallas police officer, Robert W. Wood, during a traffic stop. The Dallas Police Department was unable to make an arrest until they learned of information given by a 16-year-old resident of Vidor, Texas who had told friends that he was responsible for the crime.[2] The juvenile, David Ray Harris, led police to the car driven from the scene of the crime, as well as a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.22 caliber revolver he identified as the murder weapon. He subsequently identified 28-year-old Ohio resident Randall Dale Adams as the murderer. Adams had been living in a motel in Dallas with his brother. The film presents a series of interviews about the investigation and reenactments of the shooting, based on the testimony and recollections of Adams, Harris, and various witnesses and detectives. Two attorneys who represented Adams at the trial where he was convicted of capital murder also appear: they suggest that Adams was charged with the crime despite the better evidence against Harris because, as Harris was a juvenile, Adams alone of the two could be sentenced to death under Texas law.

The film's title comes from the prosecutor's comment during his closing argument, paraphrasing Rudyard Kipling's Tommy, that the police are the "thin blue line" separating society from anarchy.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you forgot the classic documentary : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Thin \ _Blue \ _Line \ _ ( documentary ) [ wikipedia.org ] The film concerns the November 28 , 1976 murder of Dallas police officer , Robert W. Wood , during a traffic stop .
The Dallas Police Department was unable to make an arrest until they learned of information given by a 16-year-old resident of Vidor , Texas who had told friends that he was responsible for the crime .
[ 2 ] The juvenile , David Ray Harris , led police to the car driven from the scene of the crime , as well as a .22 caliber revolver he identified as the murder weapon .
He subsequently identified 28-year-old Ohio resident Randall Dale Adams as the murderer .
Adams had been living in a motel in Dallas with his brother .
The film presents a series of interviews about the investigation and reenactments of the shooting , based on the testimony and recollections of Adams , Harris , and various witnesses and detectives .
Two attorneys who represented Adams at the trial where he was convicted of capital murder also appear : they suggest that Adams was charged with the crime despite the better evidence against Harris because , as Harris was a juvenile , Adams alone of the two could be sentenced to death under Texas law .
The film 's title comes from the prosecutor 's comment during his closing argument , paraphrasing Rudyard Kipling 's Tommy , that the police are the " thin blue line " separating society from anarchy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you forgot the classic documentary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Thin\_Blue\_Line\_(documentary) [wikipedia.org]The film concerns the November 28, 1976 murder of Dallas police officer, Robert W. Wood, during a traffic stop.
The Dallas Police Department was unable to make an arrest until they learned of information given by a 16-year-old resident of Vidor, Texas who had told friends that he was responsible for the crime.
[2] The juvenile, David Ray Harris, led police to the car driven from the scene of the crime, as well as a .22 caliber revolver he identified as the murder weapon.
He subsequently identified 28-year-old Ohio resident Randall Dale Adams as the murderer.
Adams had been living in a motel in Dallas with his brother.
The film presents a series of interviews about the investigation and reenactments of the shooting, based on the testimony and recollections of Adams, Harris, and various witnesses and detectives.
Two attorneys who represented Adams at the trial where he was convicted of capital murder also appear: they suggest that Adams was charged with the crime despite the better evidence against Harris because, as Harris was a juvenile, Adams alone of the two could be sentenced to death under Texas law.
The film's title comes from the prosecutor's comment during his closing argument, paraphrasing Rudyard Kipling's Tommy, that the police are the "thin blue line" separating society from anarchy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288373</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>virgil\_disgr4ce</author>
	<datestamp>1244646300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You need to flex your imagination.

A kid fabricates a video implicating his enemy in some crime that would appeal to the barely restrained hatred of internet trolls, a hatred always ready to manifest itself.  He recreates the target's bedroom, posters, etc., and makes sure the video finds its way into just the right hands, then riles his audience to a fever pitch.  That kid wouldn't even have to be particularly malicious, just ignorant; he probably wouldn't even imagine it ending as badly as it could.

Look, this is no different than any other kind of fraud, except that the apparent solution&#226;""internet justice"&#226;"is being lauded instead of being more aptly compared to a crowd of pitchfork-wielding racists (for instance; replace with any non-internet, real-life trolls).</htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to flex your imagination .
A kid fabricates a video implicating his enemy in some crime that would appeal to the barely restrained hatred of internet trolls , a hatred always ready to manifest itself .
He recreates the target 's bedroom , posters , etc. , and makes sure the video finds its way into just the right hands , then riles his audience to a fever pitch .
That kid would n't even have to be particularly malicious , just ignorant ; he probably would n't even imagine it ending as badly as it could .
Look , this is no different than any other kind of fraud , except that the apparent solution   " " internet justice "   " is being lauded instead of being more aptly compared to a crowd of pitchfork-wielding racists ( for instance ; replace with any non-internet , real-life trolls ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to flex your imagination.
A kid fabricates a video implicating his enemy in some crime that would appeal to the barely restrained hatred of internet trolls, a hatred always ready to manifest itself.
He recreates the target's bedroom, posters, etc., and makes sure the video finds its way into just the right hands, then riles his audience to a fever pitch.
That kid wouldn't even have to be particularly malicious, just ignorant; he probably wouldn't even imagine it ending as badly as it could.
Look, this is no different than any other kind of fraud, except that the apparent solutionâ""internet justice"â"is being lauded instead of being more aptly compared to a crowd of pitchfork-wielding racists (for instance; replace with any non-internet, real-life trolls).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282823</id>
	<title>Re:Mob Mentality and Internet Rabble-Rousing</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1244661600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their own</i></p><p>Hmmm... do you have a link? I've seen all sorts of violence advocated on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. against scumbag organizations trying to destroy people's lives using illegal and unethical tactics in the name of copyright enforcement, but never for just a different view.</p><p>Spammers on the other hand must die horribly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their ownHmmm... do you have a link ?
I 've seen all sorts of violence advocated on / .
against scumbag organizations trying to destroy people 's lives using illegal and unethical tactics in the name of copyright enforcement , but never for just a different view.Spammers on the other hand must die horribly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their ownHmmm... do you have a link?
I've seen all sorts of violence advocated on /.
against scumbag organizations trying to destroy people's lives using illegal and unethical tactics in the name of copyright enforcement, but never for just a different view.Spammers on the other hand must die horribly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721</id>
	<title>Grace Wang</title>
	<author>xplenumx</author>
	<datestamp>1244661120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>it is not a good thing.</i><p>
I'm sure <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/17student.html" title="nytimes.com">Grace Wang</a> [nytimes.com] would agree with you.</p><p>
In brief, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89803198" title="npr.org">Grace Wang</a> [npr.org] was an international student at Duke and dared to try an initiate a discussion between the pro-Tibet and pro-Chinese sides of a protest.  After being attacked on forums such as mitbbs.com "Online Vigilantes" decided to bring these attacks to the real world by posting her personal information (her student visa application) and providing maps to her parents' house (which was defaced, causing her parents to go into hiding).</p><p>
Defending kittens are one thing, but as with "think of the children", it rarely stops there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is not a good thing .
I 'm sure Grace Wang [ nytimes.com ] would agree with you .
In brief , Grace Wang [ npr.org ] was an international student at Duke and dared to try an initiate a discussion between the pro-Tibet and pro-Chinese sides of a protest .
After being attacked on forums such as mitbbs.com " Online Vigilantes " decided to bring these attacks to the real world by posting her personal information ( her student visa application ) and providing maps to her parents ' house ( which was defaced , causing her parents to go into hiding ) .
Defending kittens are one thing , but as with " think of the children " , it rarely stops there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is not a good thing.
I'm sure Grace Wang [nytimes.com] would agree with you.
In brief, Grace Wang [npr.org] was an international student at Duke and dared to try an initiate a discussion between the pro-Tibet and pro-Chinese sides of a protest.
After being attacked on forums such as mitbbs.com "Online Vigilantes" decided to bring these attacks to the real world by posting her personal information (her student visa application) and providing maps to her parents' house (which was defaced, causing her parents to go into hiding).
Defending kittens are one thing, but as with "think of the children", it rarely stops there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285747</id>
	<title>Except...</title>
	<author>TopperMcNabb</author>
	<datestamp>1244630220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Except you don't get to decide if it's murder or not. That's the lawmakers' job. Otherwise, you're committing the same action: deciding you know better than the law.</i>


I would not so easily place my faith in the law as I would anything else. Every aspect of this world has shown an insatiable desire to be corrupted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except you do n't get to decide if it 's murder or not .
That 's the lawmakers ' job .
Otherwise , you 're committing the same action : deciding you know better than the law .
I would not so easily place my faith in the law as I would anything else .
Every aspect of this world has shown an insatiable desire to be corrupted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except you don't get to decide if it's murder or not.
That's the lawmakers' job.
Otherwise, you're committing the same action: deciding you know better than the law.
I would not so easily place my faith in the law as I would anything else.
Every aspect of this world has shown an insatiable desire to be corrupted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282235</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>panthroman</author>
	<datestamp>1244659200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The internet-justice connection is also about making information easily accessible to the public.  And sometimes the public know what the police don't.</p><p>Ted Kaczynsky was identified by his brother somewhat due to his reversed (though also correct) use of the phrase <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Have\_one's\_cake\_and\_eat\_it\_too#Unabomber\_Reversal" title="wikipedia.org">'you can't eat your cake and have it too.'</a> [wikipedia.org]  I imagine many aspects of a crime could be identified through that kind of esoteric data, if only the right people saw it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet-justice connection is also about making information easily accessible to the public .
And sometimes the public know what the police do n't.Ted Kaczynsky was identified by his brother somewhat due to his reversed ( though also correct ) use of the phrase 'you ca n't eat your cake and have it too .
' [ wikipedia.org ] I imagine many aspects of a crime could be identified through that kind of esoteric data , if only the right people saw it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet-justice connection is also about making information easily accessible to the public.
And sometimes the public know what the police don't.Ted Kaczynsky was identified by his brother somewhat due to his reversed (though also correct) use of the phrase 'you can't eat your cake and have it too.
' [wikipedia.org]  I imagine many aspects of a crime could be identified through that kind of esoteric data, if only the right people saw it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283471</id>
	<title>better things to do</title>
	<author>burris</author>
	<datestamp>1244664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe these people should stop worrying about cats and direct their energies to the tens of millions of human beings suffering under brutal oppression, man-made famine, religious and gender persecution, torture, and unlawful detention.</p><p>Then again, what else should I expect from a culture that demonizes and imprisons someone for arranging dog fights while former leaders and government officials who ordered the torture of humans are given a platform for their disgusting rationalizations and don't even face a trial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe these people should stop worrying about cats and direct their energies to the tens of millions of human beings suffering under brutal oppression , man-made famine , religious and gender persecution , torture , and unlawful detention.Then again , what else should I expect from a culture that demonizes and imprisons someone for arranging dog fights while former leaders and government officials who ordered the torture of humans are given a platform for their disgusting rationalizations and do n't even face a trial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe these people should stop worrying about cats and direct their energies to the tens of millions of human beings suffering under brutal oppression, man-made famine, religious and gender persecution, torture, and unlawful detention.Then again, what else should I expect from a culture that demonizes and imprisons someone for arranging dog fights while former leaders and government officials who ordered the torture of humans are given a platform for their disgusting rationalizations and don't even face a trial.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283083</id>
	<title>Give me a break</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1244662680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever.'</p></div><p>I call BS.  The Internet is a gaping global case of Attention Deficit Disorder.  Show it a cute LOLCAT image, or a video of someone getting hit in the balls, and totally forgets about flavor-of-the-month investigation project.</p><p>.</p><p>Richard Kimble: I DIDN'T KILL MY WIFE!!</p><p>4chan.org/b/: I DON'T CARE!.....Ooo look guys, new cam-whore!  lulz, she's ugly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever.'I call BS .
The Internet is a gaping global case of Attention Deficit Disorder .
Show it a cute LOLCAT image , or a video of someone getting hit in the balls , and totally forgets about flavor-of-the-month investigation project..Richard Kimble : I DID N'T KILL MY WIFE !
! 4chan.org/b/ : I DO N'T CARE ! .....Ooo look guys , new cam-whore !
lulz , she 's ugly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever.'I call BS.
The Internet is a gaping global case of Attention Deficit Disorder.
Show it a cute LOLCAT image, or a video of someone getting hit in the balls, and totally forgets about flavor-of-the-month investigation project..Richard Kimble: I DIDN'T KILL MY WIFE!
!4chan.org/b/: I DON'T CARE!.....Ooo look guys, new cam-whore!
lulz, she's ugly.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282211</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1244659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A STREET vigilante was jailed for six years...</i></p><p>Six years? For what should have been murder? Six years is even light for manslaughter.</p><p>Sheesh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A STREET vigilante was jailed for six years...Six years ?
For what should have been murder ?
Six years is even light for manslaughter.Sheesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A STREET vigilante was jailed for six years...Six years?
For what should have been murder?
Six years is even light for manslaughter.Sheesh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284197</id>
	<title>Cyber-lynch mob</title>
	<author>hessian</author>
	<datestamp>1244667300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait until they make their first mistake and crush the first innocent person.</p><p>Wait until you see this being used to hound, ostracize and impoverish political dissidents.</p><p>If a lynch mob is a bad idea, a cyber lynch-mob is a bad idea.</p><p>And even more poignant: for every one cat killed by a Chinese psycho, probably 100,000 are euthanized in animal shelters across America.</p><p>Dying in pain or not, dead is still dead, and those cats are dead.</p><p>The Crowd wants to deny its real problems, which are systematic and institutional cruelty to animals and people, by beating up on a few scapegoats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until they make their first mistake and crush the first innocent person.Wait until you see this being used to hound , ostracize and impoverish political dissidents.If a lynch mob is a bad idea , a cyber lynch-mob is a bad idea.And even more poignant : for every one cat killed by a Chinese psycho , probably 100,000 are euthanized in animal shelters across America.Dying in pain or not , dead is still dead , and those cats are dead.The Crowd wants to deny its real problems , which are systematic and institutional cruelty to animals and people , by beating up on a few scapegoats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until they make their first mistake and crush the first innocent person.Wait until you see this being used to hound, ostracize and impoverish political dissidents.If a lynch mob is a bad idea, a cyber lynch-mob is a bad idea.And even more poignant: for every one cat killed by a Chinese psycho, probably 100,000 are euthanized in animal shelters across America.Dying in pain or not, dead is still dead, and those cats are dead.The Crowd wants to deny its real problems, which are systematic and institutional cruelty to animals and people, by beating up on a few scapegoats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283097</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1244662740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the victim here wasn't all that random. He was an Indian immigrant. Funny how racial minorities tend to be victims of "mistaken identity" more than the rest of us. Which leads us to a <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=strange\%20fruit\%20lynching" title="google.com">completely different reason</a> [google.com] to despise vigilante "justice".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the victim here was n't all that random .
He was an Indian immigrant .
Funny how racial minorities tend to be victims of " mistaken identity " more than the rest of us .
Which leads us to a completely different reason [ google.com ] to despise vigilante " justice " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the victim here wasn't all that random.
He was an Indian immigrant.
Funny how racial minorities tend to be victims of "mistaken identity" more than the rest of us.
Which leads us to a completely different reason [google.com] to despise vigilante "justice".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282129</id>
	<title>OK, Now if they can find...</title>
	<author>meburke</author>
	<datestamp>1244658660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obama's real Birth certificate...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obama 's real Birth certificate.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obama's real Birth certificate...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282043</id>
	<title>FAIL at quoting Anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We do not forgive. We do not forget." (and they have over 9000 penises that are all raping children! Just ask Oprah!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We do not forgive .
We do not forget .
" ( and they have over 9000 penises that are all raping children !
Just ask Oprah !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
" (and they have over 9000 penises that are all raping children!
Just ask Oprah!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281965</id>
	<title>the intertubes - my new favs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped. Ever." that's why I'm adding the internet to my Fav5.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Internet does not forget , does not forgive and can not be stopped .
Ever. " that 's why I 'm adding the internet to my Fav5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Internet does not forget, does not forgive and cannot be stopped.
Ever." that's why I'm adding the internet to my Fav5.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285921</id>
	<title>Re:Not really the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>CantGetAUserName</author>
	<datestamp>1244630820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you considered how effective this could be if a certain cult that prefers attack to defence (or, indeed, anyone with anything to hide) can figure out how to work this to their advantage. If this keeps up I'm thinking it won't be too long before prying too deeply into some cults results in accusations of kitten-stomping or worse, because if you're busy cleaning the graffitti from your front door you won't be pursuing the cult in question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you considered how effective this could be if a certain cult that prefers attack to defence ( or , indeed , anyone with anything to hide ) can figure out how to work this to their advantage .
If this keeps up I 'm thinking it wo n't be too long before prying too deeply into some cults results in accusations of kitten-stomping or worse , because if you 're busy cleaning the graffitti from your front door you wo n't be pursuing the cult in question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you considered how effective this could be if a certain cult that prefers attack to defence (or, indeed, anyone with anything to hide) can figure out how to work this to their advantage.
If this keeps up I'm thinking it won't be too long before prying too deeply into some cults results in accusations of kitten-stomping or worse, because if you're busy cleaning the graffitti from your front door you won't be pursuing the cult in question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283559</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>billcopc</author>
	<datestamp>1244664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one specific problem, but the GLOBAL problem with vigilante justice is it has no defined endpoint.</p><p>If the vigilante response exceeds what is considered "fair", and it usually does, the instinctive reaction by the accused is to retaliate.  It's not a criminal mind type thing, it's human nature.  If I call you names and you punch me in the balls, I will knock you with a baseball bat, and you will shoot me in the ass, and I will burn down your house with your family trapped inside, etc etc etc... the rage continues to snowball without any sort of control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one specific problem , but the GLOBAL problem with vigilante justice is it has no defined endpoint.If the vigilante response exceeds what is considered " fair " , and it usually does , the instinctive reaction by the accused is to retaliate .
It 's not a criminal mind type thing , it 's human nature .
If I call you names and you punch me in the balls , I will knock you with a baseball bat , and you will shoot me in the ass , and I will burn down your house with your family trapped inside , etc etc etc... the rage continues to snowball without any sort of control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one specific problem, but the GLOBAL problem with vigilante justice is it has no defined endpoint.If the vigilante response exceeds what is considered "fair", and it usually does, the instinctive reaction by the accused is to retaliate.
It's not a criminal mind type thing, it's human nature.
If I call you names and you punch me in the balls, I will knock you with a baseball bat, and you will shoot me in the ass, and I will burn down your house with your family trapped inside, etc etc etc... the rage continues to snowball without any sort of control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282609</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I'm not too thrilled about people taking the law into their own hands, lets try to keep some perspective. How many innocent people have been jailed or executed by our 'proper' systems of justice? More than a few, I'll bet. Judges and juries are prone to making mistakes just like the rest of us. Most of these internet vigilante cases so far have ended in personal information being made public, threats against the suspects and evidence being sent to local authorities who take it from there (unless the person didn't actually commit a crime in his country). I'm hoping the internet gives some sense of separation from the issue that keeps people from doing anything too rash, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'm not too thrilled about people taking the law into their own hands , lets try to keep some perspective .
How many innocent people have been jailed or executed by our 'proper ' systems of justice ?
More than a few , I 'll bet .
Judges and juries are prone to making mistakes just like the rest of us .
Most of these internet vigilante cases so far have ended in personal information being made public , threats against the suspects and evidence being sent to local authorities who take it from there ( unless the person did n't actually commit a crime in his country ) .
I 'm hoping the internet gives some sense of separation from the issue that keeps people from doing anything too rash , but I guess we 'll have to wait and see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'm not too thrilled about people taking the law into their own hands, lets try to keep some perspective.
How many innocent people have been jailed or executed by our 'proper' systems of justice?
More than a few, I'll bet.
Judges and juries are prone to making mistakes just like the rest of us.
Most of these internet vigilante cases so far have ended in personal information being made public, threats against the suspects and evidence being sent to local authorities who take it from there (unless the person didn't actually commit a crime in his country).
I'm hoping the internet gives some sense of separation from the issue that keeps people from doing anything too rash, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287329</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244639040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for sharing that. It was an interesting read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for sharing that .
It was an interesting read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for sharing that.
It was an interesting read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282645</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>Random2</author>
	<datestamp>1244660820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Welcome to the American legal justice system?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the American legal justice system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the American legal justice system?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109</id>
	<title>NSFW link.</title>
	<author>SatanicPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1244658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just in case someone <em>here</em>...by some freak chance...doesn't know that RedTube is basically YouTube for Porn, don't clicky the linky if you're at work...y.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in case someone here...by some freak chance...does n't know that RedTube is basically YouTube for Porn , do n't clicky the linky if you 're at work...y .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in case someone here...by some freak chance...doesn't know that RedTube is basically YouTube for Porn, don't clicky the linky if you're at work...y.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283535</id>
	<title>I'm GLAD, you hear me? GLAD!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244664660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was subjected to a video of someone drowning a cat today and it made me sick. Yes; subjected. I went to a site where I didn't expect such things to appear. It took me a few seconds to realize what I was seeing. Then I promptly close the window. But the damage to my psyche was done. I wished there was someway I could reach into the internet and smash the person who tortured that cat.</p><p>I now feel better knowing that some people are punished for such deeds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was subjected to a video of someone drowning a cat today and it made me sick .
Yes ; subjected .
I went to a site where I did n't expect such things to appear .
It took me a few seconds to realize what I was seeing .
Then I promptly close the window .
But the damage to my psyche was done .
I wished there was someway I could reach into the internet and smash the person who tortured that cat.I now feel better knowing that some people are punished for such deeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was subjected to a video of someone drowning a cat today and it made me sick.
Yes; subjected.
I went to a site where I didn't expect such things to appear.
It took me a few seconds to realize what I was seeing.
Then I promptly close the window.
But the damage to my psyche was done.
I wished there was someway I could reach into the internet and smash the person who tortured that cat.I now feel better knowing that some people are punished for such deeds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282467</id>
	<title>I did it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244660040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the lulz!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the lulz !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the lulz!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282131</id>
	<title>Re:The Author</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think its somewhere in  <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Anonymous#The\_Sekrit\_Code\_of\_Anonymous" title="encycloped...matica.com" rel="nofollow">the ebaums code</a> [encycloped...matica.com]:
<br> <br>Anonymous is Legion. <br>
Anonymous does not forgive. <br>
Anonymous does not forget.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think its somewhere in the ebaums code [ encycloped...matica.com ] : Anonymous is Legion .
Anonymous does not forgive .
Anonymous does not forget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think its somewhere in  the ebaums code [encycloped...matica.com]:
 Anonymous is Legion.
Anonymous does not forgive.
Anonymous does not forget.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282621</id>
	<title>ED</title>
	<author>Grithok</author>
	<datestamp>1244660760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basically this is a post about encyclopedia dramatica?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically this is a post about encyclopedia dramatica ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically this is a post about encyclopedia dramatica?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288977</id>
	<title>Re:Grace Wang</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244651940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowing her, I would the NYTimes piece is very biased (in a good way, naturally, towards human rights).  But the girl is an attention-whoring slut, and deserves what she got and more.  Those pieces are her side of the story only- if you ask her roommate, you'll know what kind of "person" she really is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing her , I would the NYTimes piece is very biased ( in a good way , naturally , towards human rights ) .
But the girl is an attention-whoring slut , and deserves what she got and more .
Those pieces are her side of the story only- if you ask her roommate , you 'll know what kind of " person " she really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing her, I would the NYTimes piece is very biased (in a good way, naturally, towards human rights).
But the girl is an attention-whoring slut, and deserves what she got and more.
Those pieces are her side of the story only- if you ask her roommate, you'll know what kind of "person" she really is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249</id>
	<title>Mob Mentality and Internet Rabble-Rousing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many people will SAY anything.  I've seen people on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their own.  Extreme positions get amplified on the internet because extreme people can easily interact with other like-minded extreme people.  That's all fine and dandy, so long as it's just idiots saying stupid stuff.  Freedom of speech, whatever.</p><p>The problem for me is that there is a very small minority of people who can be triggered to act by the incitement of others.  These people will reach out and HURT people with little or no factual support.  Unless stopped, people like this exert an evil influence all out of proportion to their otherwise insignificant place in society.  Nazis did that kind of stuff in the 1930s and it really chilled the behavior of other law-abiding Germans.  A real turd-Kultur was created there. That kind of history ought best not be repeated.</p><p>If people alter their behavior because they are afraid of being tormented by Internet-spawned wrongful "meat world" attacks, then they are not free.  Balancing protection from such acts with the right to freely interact on the internet is a serious legal and moral challenge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many people will SAY anything .
I 've seen people on / .
advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their own .
Extreme positions get amplified on the internet because extreme people can easily interact with other like-minded extreme people .
That 's all fine and dandy , so long as it 's just idiots saying stupid stuff .
Freedom of speech , whatever.The problem for me is that there is a very small minority of people who can be triggered to act by the incitement of others .
These people will reach out and HURT people with little or no factual support .
Unless stopped , people like this exert an evil influence all out of proportion to their otherwise insignificant place in society .
Nazis did that kind of stuff in the 1930s and it really chilled the behavior of other law-abiding Germans .
A real turd-Kultur was created there .
That kind of history ought best not be repeated.If people alter their behavior because they are afraid of being tormented by Internet-spawned wrongful " meat world " attacks , then they are not free .
Balancing protection from such acts with the right to freely interact on the internet is a serious legal and moral challenge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many people will SAY anything.
I've seen people on /.
advocate the murder of people who hold views of copyright different from their own.
Extreme positions get amplified on the internet because extreme people can easily interact with other like-minded extreme people.
That's all fine and dandy, so long as it's just idiots saying stupid stuff.
Freedom of speech, whatever.The problem for me is that there is a very small minority of people who can be triggered to act by the incitement of others.
These people will reach out and HURT people with little or no factual support.
Unless stopped, people like this exert an evil influence all out of proportion to their otherwise insignificant place in society.
Nazis did that kind of stuff in the 1930s and it really chilled the behavior of other law-abiding Germans.
A real turd-Kultur was created there.
That kind of history ought best not be repeated.If people alter their behavior because they are afraid of being tormented by Internet-spawned wrongful "meat world" attacks, then they are not free.
Balancing protection from such acts with the right to freely interact on the internet is a serious legal and moral challenge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286321</id>
	<title>Re:Cyber-lynch mob</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244632620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every living thing dies at some point... what's your point? Most people would prefer to be quietly euthanized than stomped to death by a woman in stiletto heals. And for those of you who prefer being stomped on by stilettos, I'm sure they have porn for that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every living thing dies at some point... what 's your point ?
Most people would prefer to be quietly euthanized than stomped to death by a woman in stiletto heals .
And for those of you who prefer being stomped on by stilettos , I 'm sure they have porn for that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every living thing dies at some point... what's your point?
Most people would prefer to be quietly euthanized than stomped to death by a woman in stiletto heals.
And for those of you who prefer being stomped on by stilettos, I'm sure they have porn for that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281899</id>
	<title>Internet? Or Terminator..?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244657820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds about the same...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds about the same.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds about the same...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283493</id>
	<title>Re:NSFW link.</title>
	<author>MarkGriz</author>
	<datestamp>1244664480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you happen to work in the porn industry</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you happen to work in the porn industry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you happen to work in the porn industry</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951</id>
	<title>I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1244658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>it is not a good thing,</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is not a good thing,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is not a good thing,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282097</id>
	<title>Re:The Author</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Simpsons said it more eloquently, I believe:</p><p>"We've given the word 'mob' a bad name!"<br>- Dr. Hibbert</p><p>This is really just mob justice but 'On the Internet' (tm).  Sometimes mob justice is right... sometimes it's wrong.  But either way it's powerful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Simpsons said it more eloquently , I believe : " We 've given the word 'mob ' a bad name !
" - Dr. HibbertThis is really just mob justice but 'On the Internet ' ( tm ) .
Sometimes mob justice is right... sometimes it 's wrong .
But either way it 's powerful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Simpsons said it more eloquently, I believe:"We've given the word 'mob' a bad name!
"- Dr. HibbertThis is really just mob justice but 'On the Internet' (tm).
Sometimes mob justice is right... sometimes it's wrong.
But either way it's powerful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282499</id>
	<title>My Hyperbole Detector...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...just exploded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...just exploded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...just exploded.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281987</id>
	<title>Hell yeah...</title>
	<author>geminidomino</author>
	<datestamp>1244658120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad the pricks from Oklahoma are going down.</p><p>Hope the vigilantes take it offline against that Chinese cunt though, or she's gonna walk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad the pricks from Oklahoma are going down.Hope the vigilantes take it offline against that Chinese cunt though , or she 's gon na walk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad the pricks from Oklahoma are going down.Hope the vigilantes take it offline against that Chinese cunt though, or she's gonna walk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282041</id>
	<title>Dickwad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you're a cum-guzzling bitch..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're a cum-guzzling bitch. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're a cum-guzzling bitch..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293391</id>
	<title>Re:Democracy vs a Republic</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244733540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>drat the political science major has outed me! (hides) Correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>drat the political science major has outed me !
( hides ) Correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drat the political science major has outed me!
(hides) Correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283567</id>
	<title>Re:Netizens are the new Jack Bauer</title>
	<author>qengho</author>
	<datestamp>1244664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And why cats?</p></div><p>Quite. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28292558" title="msn.com">The Chinese <i>eat</i> cats.</a> [msn.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And why cats ? Quite .
The Chinese eat cats .
[ msn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why cats?Quite.
The Chinese eat cats.
[msn.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283543</id>
	<title>Nonsense</title>
	<author>darthwader</author>
	<datestamp>1244664720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "cannot be stopped" part of the summary is complete nonsense.  All you need to do to stop the internet is show it something shiny.  Public opinion and passion is notoriously fickle.</p><p>If there are a thousand crimes committed, the police will make a real effort to investigate all of them, allocating their resources reasonably according to the severity of the crime and the likelyhood of a successful investigation.  They will work on an investigation for days, weeks, months or years as required.</p><p>The internet "angry mob", on the other hand, will only investigate the single most exciting, dramatic, attention-getting crime.  They will devote 100\% of their effort to finding a scapegoat for that crime, until they get bored or something more exciting comes along.</p><p>A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses (think "Amber alert"), but it is still in control of the investigation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " can not be stopped " part of the summary is complete nonsense .
All you need to do to stop the internet is show it something shiny .
Public opinion and passion is notoriously fickle.If there are a thousand crimes committed , the police will make a real effort to investigate all of them , allocating their resources reasonably according to the severity of the crime and the likelyhood of a successful investigation .
They will work on an investigation for days , weeks , months or years as required.The internet " angry mob " , on the other hand , will only investigate the single most exciting , dramatic , attention-getting crime .
They will devote 100 \ % of their effort to finding a scapegoat for that crime , until they get bored or something more exciting comes along.A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses ( think " Amber alert " ) , but it is still in control of the investigation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "cannot be stopped" part of the summary is complete nonsense.
All you need to do to stop the internet is show it something shiny.
Public opinion and passion is notoriously fickle.If there are a thousand crimes committed, the police will make a real effort to investigate all of them, allocating their resources reasonably according to the severity of the crime and the likelyhood of a successful investigation.
They will work on an investigation for days, weeks, months or years as required.The internet "angry mob", on the other hand, will only investigate the single most exciting, dramatic, attention-getting crime.
They will devote 100\% of their effort to finding a scapegoat for that crime, until they get bored or something more exciting comes along.A smart police force can and will use the power of the masses (think "Amber alert"), but it is still in control of the investigation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282451</id>
	<title>I, for one...</title>
	<author>SlovakWakko</author>
	<datestamp>1244659980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...welcome our new YouTube watching overlords!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...welcome our new YouTube watching overlords !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...welcome our new YouTube watching overlords!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283137</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1244662920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext> I disagree. This is no different than laws designed to deter individuals from performing unacceptable acts. Peer pressure can be a socially acceptable conditioning tool. The end result is the same. If these online vigilantes help capture said criminals then it harms no one. If the go beyond that and in turn break the laws, then they should be dealt with accordingly. That doesn't mean that all vigilante acts are inherently wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
This is no different than laws designed to deter individuals from performing unacceptable acts .
Peer pressure can be a socially acceptable conditioning tool .
The end result is the same .
If these online vigilantes help capture said criminals then it harms no one .
If the go beyond that and in turn break the laws , then they should be dealt with accordingly .
That does n't mean that all vigilante acts are inherently wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I disagree.
This is no different than laws designed to deter individuals from performing unacceptable acts.
Peer pressure can be a socially acceptable conditioning tool.
The end result is the same.
If these online vigilantes help capture said criminals then it harms no one.
If the go beyond that and in turn break the laws, then they should be dealt with accordingly.
That doesn't mean that all vigilante acts are inherently wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107</id>
	<title>Democracy vs a Republic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I offer this:</p><p>Look at history, and political science and take a hard look at why republics functioned beter then pure democracy. The Internet runs the same risk.</p><p>Take heed and good luck, crowd sourcing has a hidden downside people are forgetting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I offer this : Look at history , and political science and take a hard look at why republics functioned beter then pure democracy .
The Internet runs the same risk.Take heed and good luck , crowd sourcing has a hidden downside people are forgetting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I offer this:Look at history, and political science and take a hard look at why republics functioned beter then pure democracy.
The Internet runs the same risk.Take heed and good luck, crowd sourcing has a hidden downside people are forgetting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282905</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You obviously haven't been to law school, through a corrections course, or seen what happens to people who have ever been convicted of a crime. There's a reason we have higher recidivism rates than nearly any other country on earth. We destroy the lives of our convicts, often off of shreds of evidence that are flamboyantly paraded by charismatic lawyers while denying evidence that could change the verdict because of legal technicalities. Good luck getting a job if you've been convicted.<div><p>
These groups only really pursue people who do one of two things - 1) try to make information that is free unfree (the antithesis of the internet), and 2) do things so abhorrant that they rouse the majority to action against them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You obviously have n't been to law school , through a corrections course , or seen what happens to people who have ever been convicted of a crime .
There 's a reason we have higher recidivism rates than nearly any other country on earth .
We destroy the lives of our convicts , often off of shreds of evidence that are flamboyantly paraded by charismatic lawyers while denying evidence that could change the verdict because of legal technicalities .
Good luck getting a job if you 've been convicted .
These groups only really pursue people who do one of two things - 1 ) try to make information that is free unfree ( the antithesis of the internet ) , and 2 ) do things so abhorrant that they rouse the majority to action against them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You obviously haven't been to law school, through a corrections course, or seen what happens to people who have ever been convicted of a crime.
There's a reason we have higher recidivism rates than nearly any other country on earth.
We destroy the lives of our convicts, often off of shreds of evidence that are flamboyantly paraded by charismatic lawyers while denying evidence that could change the verdict because of legal technicalities.
Good luck getting a job if you've been convicted.
These groups only really pursue people who do one of two things - 1) try to make information that is free unfree (the antithesis of the internet), and 2) do things so abhorrant that they rouse the majority to action against them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282765</id>
	<title>...and justice for all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244661300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The government isn't going to waste time and money going after these people and thus far it sure seems like these are some fuckers who really deserve whatever the government can do to them. People who participate in hunting these people are just filling a void.<br>It sounds like nothing illegal was done by those participating in the hunt, at least nothing obvious. It's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them, they just all want to express their opinion at the same time to that person and make sure that everyone who knows them is aware of what they have done. Is it really a lynch mob if the noose is nothing more than information?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The government is n't going to waste time and money going after these people and thus far it sure seems like these are some fuckers who really deserve whatever the government can do to them .
People who participate in hunting these people are just filling a void.It sounds like nothing illegal was done by those participating in the hunt , at least nothing obvious .
It 's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them , they just all want to express their opinion at the same time to that person and make sure that everyone who knows them is aware of what they have done .
Is it really a lynch mob if the noose is nothing more than information ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The government isn't going to waste time and money going after these people and thus far it sure seems like these are some fuckers who really deserve whatever the government can do to them.
People who participate in hunting these people are just filling a void.It sounds like nothing illegal was done by those participating in the hunt, at least nothing obvious.
It's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them, they just all want to express their opinion at the same time to that person and make sure that everyone who knows them is aware of what they have done.
Is it really a lynch mob if the noose is nothing more than information?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283697</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>TomRK1089</author>
	<datestamp>1244665260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did such an obvious troll get +4 Informative? Because obviously the justice system with checks and balances is inferior to beating the snot out of someone on what amounts to hearsay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did such an obvious troll get + 4 Informative ?
Because obviously the justice system with checks and balances is inferior to beating the snot out of someone on what amounts to hearsay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did such an obvious troll get +4 Informative?
Because obviously the justice system with checks and balances is inferior to beating the snot out of someone on what amounts to hearsay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282843</id>
	<title>Re:It's great! ...until...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244661720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, right. Like the police never make a mistake and beat down some innocent man. (They beat and kill deaf people for "not obeying our commands" all the time. Google it.) And the courts never make a mistake and convict an innocent man. But crowds, they can't be trusted, because they make mistakes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , right .
Like the police never make a mistake and beat down some innocent man .
( They beat and kill deaf people for " not obeying our commands " all the time .
Google it .
) And the courts never make a mistake and convict an innocent man .
But crowds , they ca n't be trusted , because they make mistakes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, right.
Like the police never make a mistake and beat down some innocent man.
(They beat and kill deaf people for "not obeying our commands" all the time.
Google it.
) And the courts never make a mistake and convict an innocent man.
But crowds, they can't be trusted, because they make mistakes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287883</id>
	<title>angry mob 2.0</title>
	<author>spandex\_panda</author>
	<datestamp>1244642700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>HAHA! A new meme! Those kitten killers need to feel the wrath of angry mob 2.0! Instead of burning torches and pitchforks, we the angry mob 2.0 can wield flickr, twitter, youtube and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. at the naughty witching minorities!</htmltext>
<tokenext>HAHA !
A new meme !
Those kitten killers need to feel the wrath of angry mob 2.0 !
Instead of burning torches and pitchforks , we the angry mob 2.0 can wield flickr , twitter , youtube and / .
at the naughty witching minorities !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HAHA!
A new meme!
Those kitten killers need to feel the wrath of angry mob 2.0!
Instead of burning torches and pitchforks, we the angry mob 2.0 can wield flickr, twitter, youtube and /.
at the naughty witching minorities!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286113</id>
	<title>Re:The Author</title>
	<author>Requiem18th</author>
	<datestamp>1244631420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure he did <b>expect us</b> to notice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure he did expect us to notice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure he did expect us to notice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281883</id>
	<title>Beware</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244657820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The interwebs cannot be trusted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The interwebs can not be trusted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The interwebs cannot be trusted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287723</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244641680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Best short story I've read in almost a year.</p><p>Anonymous delivers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best short story I 've read in almost a year.Anonymous delivers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best short story I've read in almost a year.Anonymous delivers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282567</id>
	<title>Re:The Author</title>
	<author>Goaway</author>
	<datestamp>1244660520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, the internet forgets in about a week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , the internet forgets in about a week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, the internet forgets in about a week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283761</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very bad feeling about this</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1244665500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus just because there haven't yet been "netizens" who get offended enough to actually commit murder, doesn't mean it won't happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus just because there have n't yet been " netizens " who get offended enough to actually commit murder , does n't mean it wo n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus just because there haven't yet been "netizens" who get offended enough to actually commit murder, doesn't mean it won't happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282343</id>
	<title>Re:urm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pornotube.com</p><p>SFW</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pornotube.comSFW</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pornotube.comSFW</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283211</id>
	<title>Re:hidden downside</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244663340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where is/was this pure democracy you speak of? With other myths like communism?</p><p>But of course here goes my argument to support yours. Direct democracy is like a rule of the mob. Mob is ruthless, violent, mindless and murderous. Being ruthless, violent, mindless and murderous is bad. So direct democracy is bad. There! </p><p>Isn't there a special fallacy for this? False analogy was it?</p><p>Direct democracy never existed. Despotic anarchy is hardly a valid historic example for deducting its "hidden downsides".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where is/was this pure democracy you speak of ?
With other myths like communism ? But of course here goes my argument to support yours .
Direct democracy is like a rule of the mob .
Mob is ruthless , violent , mindless and murderous .
Being ruthless , violent , mindless and murderous is bad .
So direct democracy is bad .
There ! Is n't there a special fallacy for this ?
False analogy was it ? Direct democracy never existed .
Despotic anarchy is hardly a valid historic example for deducting its " hidden downsides " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where is/was this pure democracy you speak of?
With other myths like communism?But of course here goes my argument to support yours.
Direct democracy is like a rule of the mob.
Mob is ruthless, violent, mindless and murderous.
Being ruthless, violent, mindless and murderous is bad.
So direct democracy is bad.
There! Isn't there a special fallacy for this?
False analogy was it?Direct democracy never existed.
Despotic anarchy is hardly a valid historic example for deducting its "hidden downsides".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28326899</id>
	<title>Re:Cats [Teen arrested in Fla. cat mutilations]</title>
	<author>Reservoir Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1244998980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090614/ap\_on\_re\_us/us\_cats\_mutilated" title="yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090614/ap\_on\_re\_us/us\_cats\_mutilated</a> [yahoo.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090614/ap \ _on \ _re \ _us/us \ _cats \ _mutilated [ yahoo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090614/ap\_on\_re\_us/us\_cats\_mutilated [yahoo.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28290609</id>
	<title>Re:Cats</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244712540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe the internet can catch <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZDCdN3Okj3MFxUnnvgzL4DJD38QD98NP3UG0" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">this guy</a> [google.com]. I hope so, and am glad he doesn't live here.</p></div><p>Oh, so it's a *guy* is it?  I've done a similar amount of investigation, and have determined (well, *guessed*) that he's white, aged 13-20, and has a mullet.  Hope that helps!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the internet can catch this guy [ google.com ] .
I hope so , and am glad he does n't live here.Oh , so it 's a * guy * is it ?
I 've done a similar amount of investigation , and have determined ( well , * guessed * ) that he 's white , aged 13-20 , and has a mullet .
Hope that helps !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the internet can catch this guy [google.com].
I hope so, and am glad he doesn't live here.Oh, so it's a *guy* is it?
I've done a similar amount of investigation, and have determined (well, *guessed*) that he's white, aged 13-20, and has a mullet.
Hope that helps!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1244657820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is less about the vigilantism of the Crowd, and more about the utter stupidity of [some] criminal/deviants.</p><p>Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes. Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is less about the vigilantism of the Crowd , and more about the utter stupidity of [ some ] criminal/deviants.Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes .
Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is less about the vigilantism of the Crowd, and more about the utter stupidity of [some] criminal/deviants.Stupid criminals shoot video of their crimes.
Incredibly fucking stupid criminals put the video on youtube.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283333</id>
	<title>Re:...and justice for all</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1244663880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them...</p></div><p>...yet.</p><p>And how long until they go after an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/wales/901723.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">innocent</a> [bbc.co.uk] <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/17student.html" title="nytimes.com">person</a> [nytimes.com]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them......yet.And how long until they go after an innocent [ bbc.co.uk ] person [ nytimes.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not like they are hunting the person down in order to physically assault them......yet.And how long until they go after an innocent [bbc.co.uk] person [nytimes.com]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281985</id>
	<title>Re:urm...</title>
	<author>Smidge207</author>
	<datestamp>1244658120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps. But maybe more like Stile project?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>=Smidge=</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps .
But maybe more like Stile project ?
; - ) = Smidge =</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps.
But maybe more like Stile project?
;-)=Smidge=</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282175</id>
	<title>Which is Worse?</title>
	<author>mdmkolbe</author>
	<datestamp>1244658900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is worse, the internet developing an emergent technology based sentience (e.g. skynet) or the internet developing an emergent crowed based sentience like in these examples?</p><p>Personally I'm not sure which would scare me more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is worse , the internet developing an emergent technology based sentience ( e.g .
skynet ) or the internet developing an emergent crowed based sentience like in these examples ? Personally I 'm not sure which would scare me more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is worse, the internet developing an emergent technology based sentience (e.g.
skynet) or the internet developing an emergent crowed based sentience like in these examples?Personally I'm not sure which would scare me more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961</id>
	<title>Cats</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1244658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the internet can catch <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZDCdN3Okj3MFxUnnvgzL4DJD38QD98NP3UG0" title="google.com">this guy</a> [google.com]. I hope so, and am glad he doesn't live here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the internet can catch this guy [ google.com ] .
I hope so , and am glad he does n't live here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the internet can catch this guy [google.com].
I hope so, and am glad he doesn't live here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28290609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28304347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283021
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28326899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1614227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282765
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283333
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28326899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28290609
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283021
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283435
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285017
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283097
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289817
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282721
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282291
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283761
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283857
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283217
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288373
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282905
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282645
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283085
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28285007
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28286321
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28289139
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28304347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282109
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287221
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28293973
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283493
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28284215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28283019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28287329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28288973
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28282173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1614227.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1614227.28281955
</commentlist>
</conversation>
