<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_10_1331258</id>
	<title>Comedy Central Confirms 26 New Futurama Episodes</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244643720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://e9thampspeakeasynet/" rel="nofollow">e9th</a> was one of several readers to write with an update to the <a href="//entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/09/017249&amp;tid=214">Futurama rumors</a> we discussed earlier this week:
<i>"TVWeek reports that 20th Century Fox Television and Comedy Central have officially <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/tvbizwire/2009/06/the-futurama-is-now-comedy-cen.php">confirmed a deal for 26 new episodes of Futurama</a>, due to the strong ratings of its reruns and feature-length specials. Matt Groening is quoted as saying, 'We're thrilled Futurama is coming back. We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000.' According to the press release, <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/press/press\_releases/2009/061009\_futurama\_returns.jhtml">the episodes will begin to come out in mid-2010</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>e9th was one of several readers to write with an update to the Futurama rumors we discussed earlier this week : " TVWeek reports that 20th Century Fox Television and Comedy Central have officially confirmed a deal for 26 new episodes of Futurama , due to the strong ratings of its reruns and feature-length specials .
Matt Groening is quoted as saying , 'We 're thrilled Futurama is coming back .
We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000 .
' According to the press release , the episodes will begin to come out in mid-2010 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>e9th was one of several readers to write with an update to the Futurama rumors we discussed earlier this week:
"TVWeek reports that 20th Century Fox Television and Comedy Central have officially confirmed a deal for 26 new episodes of Futurama, due to the strong ratings of its reruns and feature-length specials.
Matt Groening is quoted as saying, 'We're thrilled Futurama is coming back.
We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000.
' According to the press release, the episodes will begin to come out in mid-2010.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283281</id>
	<title>Re:No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244663700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hard to know if you're just some sort of messed up troll or what. Looking at your previous comments there's certainly a lot of dark humor there at the very least. Anyway, as someone who has been mildly depressed himself (spontaneous blubering, I feel so hopeless blah blah) if you've seen this coming for the last 15 years you don't sound so bad. Take some time off, figure out what's really depressing you (assuming it is external factors) and have a go at fixing them, or reevaluating their significance at least. You can always put yourself out of our misery next year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard to know if you 're just some sort of messed up troll or what .
Looking at your previous comments there 's certainly a lot of dark humor there at the very least .
Anyway , as someone who has been mildly depressed himself ( spontaneous blubering , I feel so hopeless blah blah ) if you 've seen this coming for the last 15 years you do n't sound so bad .
Take some time off , figure out what 's really depressing you ( assuming it is external factors ) and have a go at fixing them , or reevaluating their significance at least .
You can always put yourself out of our misery next year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard to know if you're just some sort of messed up troll or what.
Looking at your previous comments there's certainly a lot of dark humor there at the very least.
Anyway, as someone who has been mildly depressed himself (spontaneous blubering, I feel so hopeless blah blah) if you've seen this coming for the last 15 years you don't sound so bad.
Take some time off, figure out what's really depressing you (assuming it is external factors) and have a go at fixing them, or reevaluating their significance at least.
You can always put yourself out of our misery next year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279825</id>
	<title>Sounds like</title>
	<author>atomicthumbs</author>
	<datestamp>1244649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Huzzahs are in order!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Huzzahs are in order !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huzzahs are in order!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282349</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>n4f</author>
	<datestamp>1244659620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who really cares about what is or is not canon in Futurama?  It's a comedy show, and the writers have already admitted that when it comes to contradicting their "universe" for the sake of a good joke, they will indeed do so.  Just watch the show, don't think about it too much, and enjoy.</p><p>The writers have never ceased to amuse me with their subtlety.  The don't reference the whole dark matter issue the entire Green Yonder movie, until that one-liner right at the end that had me spitting my beer out.  You have to trust that these writers have the plots play out the way they do for a reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who really cares about what is or is not canon in Futurama ?
It 's a comedy show , and the writers have already admitted that when it comes to contradicting their " universe " for the sake of a good joke , they will indeed do so .
Just watch the show , do n't think about it too much , and enjoy.The writers have never ceased to amuse me with their subtlety .
The do n't reference the whole dark matter issue the entire Green Yonder movie , until that one-liner right at the end that had me spitting my beer out .
You have to trust that these writers have the plots play out the way they do for a reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who really cares about what is or is not canon in Futurama?
It's a comedy show, and the writers have already admitted that when it comes to contradicting their "universe" for the sake of a good joke, they will indeed do so.
Just watch the show, don't think about it too much, and enjoy.The writers have never ceased to amuse me with their subtlety.
The don't reference the whole dark matter issue the entire Green Yonder movie, until that one-liner right at the end that had me spitting my beer out.
You have to trust that these writers have the plots play out the way they do for a reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282559</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>nabsltd</author>
	<datestamp>1244660460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thinking like this is what saved <i>Dollhouse.</i></p> </div><p>No, the fire-sale slashing of the price that the Fox network had to pay for the next season saved it.</p><p>Basically, at a low enough price point, a network will show anything..."reality" shows are proof of that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thinking like this is what saved Dollhouse .
No , the fire-sale slashing of the price that the Fox network had to pay for the next season saved it.Basically , at a low enough price point , a network will show anything... " reality " shows are proof of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thinking like this is what saved Dollhouse.
No, the fire-sale slashing of the price that the Fox network had to pay for the next season saved it.Basically, at a low enough price point, a network will show anything..."reality" shows are proof of that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282811</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Tamran</author>
	<datestamp>1244661480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Correct.<br>Dollhouse is shit.</p></div><p>Agree!  I tried to give it a chance but after watch 4 episodes, it just felt like a weak re-hashing of the Buffy formula (which was juvenile at best).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Firefly is also shit.  It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.  It's just so bad.</p></div><p>(partially) Disagree! The series really had no "ending" it just stopped.  The series IMHO was definitely a contender for the best Sci-Fi show on TV ever (in that category would be the new BSG and STNG).  I've re-watched the series with friends and family and consistently they are impressed.  The movie was not so good for a movie and did fuck up a few things I agree.  The "reaver history" card seemed like a card that was supposed to be pulled out in a 3rd or 4th season but was forced in the movie.  That said, Fox messed up the series far more than the movie did.</p><p>If Firefly was re-introduced to TV I'd watch it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct.Dollhouse is shit.Agree !
I tried to give it a chance but after watch 4 episodes , it just felt like a weak re-hashing of the Buffy formula ( which was juvenile at best ) .Firefly is also shit .
It was good the first time through , but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I ca n't go and rewatch it .
It 's just so bad .
( partially ) Disagree !
The series really had no " ending " it just stopped .
The series IMHO was definitely a contender for the best Sci-Fi show on TV ever ( in that category would be the new BSG and STNG ) .
I 've re-watched the series with friends and family and consistently they are impressed .
The movie was not so good for a movie and did fuck up a few things I agree .
The " reaver history " card seemed like a card that was supposed to be pulled out in a 3rd or 4th season but was forced in the movie .
That said , Fox messed up the series far more than the movie did.If Firefly was re-introduced to TV I 'd watch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct.Dollhouse is shit.Agree!
I tried to give it a chance but after watch 4 episodes, it just felt like a weak re-hashing of the Buffy formula (which was juvenile at best).Firefly is also shit.
It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.
It's just so bad.
(partially) Disagree!
The series really had no "ending" it just stopped.
The series IMHO was definitely a contender for the best Sci-Fi show on TV ever (in that category would be the new BSG and STNG).
I've re-watched the series with friends and family and consistently they are impressed.
The movie was not so good for a movie and did fuck up a few things I agree.
The "reaver history" card seemed like a card that was supposed to be pulled out in a 3rd or 4th season but was forced in the movie.
That said, Fox messed up the series far more than the movie did.If Firefly was re-introduced to TV I'd watch it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282301</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>moderatorrater</author>
	<datestamp>1244659440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll have to disagree with you there. In my opinion the final half of the season was easily some of the best Whedon I've ever seen. The first half was crap, but it was worth it to get to the second half.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll have to disagree with you there .
In my opinion the final half of the season was easily some of the best Whedon I 've ever seen .
The first half was crap , but it was worth it to get to the second half .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll have to disagree with you there.
In my opinion the final half of the season was easily some of the best Whedon I've ever seen.
The first half was crap, but it was worth it to get to the second half.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282661</id>
	<title>Re:reboot</title>
	<author>Stavr0</author>
	<datestamp>1244660880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also, Zoidberg's home planet gets sucked into a black hole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , Zoidberg 's home planet gets sucked into a black hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, Zoidberg's home planet gets sucked into a black hole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280669</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>evilkasper</author>
	<datestamp>1244653200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because they dabble in croakamancy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they dabble in croakamancy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they dabble in croakamancy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373</id>
	<title>Huh wha...?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244647500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes, yes. We all know Comedy Central executive of extremely intelligent and deserve a huge raise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes , yes .
We all know Comedy Central executive of extremely intelligent and deserve a huge raise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes, yes.
We all know Comedy Central executive of extremely intelligent and deserve a huge raise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282077</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>soupforare</author>
	<datestamp>1244658480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.</p></div></blockquote><p>Family Guy is more like the MASH of our generation.  Will Seth get a horrible science telezine in his elder years?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.Family Guy is more like the MASH of our generation .
Will Seth get a horrible science telezine in his elder years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.Family Guy is more like the MASH of our generation.
Will Seth get a horrible science telezine in his elder years?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282437</id>
	<title>Re:It's too late</title>
	<author>naoursla</author>
	<datestamp>1244659980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be hilarious if the first episode of the relaunch had all of the characters drawn as if they were many years old trying to play the part of their younger counterparts. Also, maybe there would be a new kid who was added to freshen things up. He would supposedly be around Fry's age, but the 'actor' would be 30 years younger. Their mission would end up restoring the glory days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be hilarious if the first episode of the relaunch had all of the characters drawn as if they were many years old trying to play the part of their younger counterparts .
Also , maybe there would be a new kid who was added to freshen things up .
He would supposedly be around Fry 's age , but the 'actor ' would be 30 years younger .
Their mission would end up restoring the glory days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be hilarious if the first episode of the relaunch had all of the characters drawn as if they were many years old trying to play the part of their younger counterparts.
Also, maybe there would be a new kid who was added to freshen things up.
He would supposedly be around Fry's age, but the 'actor' would be 30 years younger.
Their mission would end up restoring the glory days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280681</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244653200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GAME SHOWS ARE BACK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GAME SHOWS ARE BACK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GAME SHOWS ARE BACK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</id>
	<title>More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244647620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>

I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.  The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea.  I don't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama.  <br> <br>

The show had a great format.  You had a mechanism for sending the crew anywhere where Professor Farnsworth would walk in saying "Good news everyone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you're going to planet X to deliver package Y" with optional information about said planet.  From there, they could go anywhere.  Using a mechanism like this was a lot like Star Trek (although better than just Trek's "for the sake of discovery" in my opinion but I know that's a monkey shit fight I can't win).  And Star Trek (or some form of it) is still going strong on that same idea.  Hell, I'll bet there's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an uncountable number of planets so there's an uncountable number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed.  <br> <br>

And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI.  <br> <br>

I think the writers did a good job of keeping multiple plot arcs up and concentrating on them every now and then to keep the fans happy.  I think the first movie (<i>Bender's Big Score</i>) was a clear indication of how much they value development in plot arcs and connections between episodes.<br> <br>

To compare it to a show far past it's prime and in a similar format: The Simpsons.  The Simpsons has explored every possible crevice and building in Springfield to center on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... from the town sundial to the quarry to the statue of Jedediah Springfield to Springfield Gorge to the old folks home to the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... they have stretched that town out so badly that recent episodes seem to seep more into neighboring towns for a desperate change of pace.  You wouldn't have this problem with Futurama.  <br> <br>

Sure, Futurama could jump the shark.  But I bet it will last a lot longer than other series if given the chance.  Sure, Futurama <i>could</i> end up worse than before the break--much like Family Guy.  But I think Family Guy depended too much on edgy questionable humor and when it came back and still had that humor it just wasn't as shocking.  And the gimmicks and long digresses got old and tedious.  I don't think Futurama relies on these as much as Family Guy.  <br> <br>

Anyways, that's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was <i>canceled</i>.  That's the only show I can say that about.  The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows.  Here's to hoping it's just as good as when it left off Season Four!  <br> <br>

For the record normally I would complain about lack of originality in a situation like this but after watching some new shows on TV I don't care.  Who ever is pitching/accepting these shows like <i>The War at Home</i> and <i>'til Death</i> should be shot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power .
The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea .
I do n't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama .
The show had a great format .
You had a mechanism for sending the crew anywhere where Professor Farnsworth would walk in saying " Good news everyone ... you 're going to planet X to deliver package Y " with optional information about said planet .
From there , they could go anywhere .
Using a mechanism like this was a lot like Star Trek ( although better than just Trek 's " for the sake of discovery " in my opinion but I know that 's a monkey shit fight I ca n't win ) .
And Star Trek ( or some form of it ) is still going strong on that same idea .
Hell , I 'll bet there 's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an uncountable number of planets so there 's an uncountable number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed .
And Futurama is animated so you 're not limited by budgets and CGI .
I think the writers did a good job of keeping multiple plot arcs up and concentrating on them every now and then to keep the fans happy .
I think the first movie ( Bender 's Big Score ) was a clear indication of how much they value development in plot arcs and connections between episodes .
To compare it to a show far past it 's prime and in a similar format : The Simpsons .
The Simpsons has explored every possible crevice and building in Springfield to center on ... from the town sundial to the quarry to the statue of Jedediah Springfield to Springfield Gorge to the old folks home to the ... they have stretched that town out so badly that recent episodes seem to seep more into neighboring towns for a desperate change of pace .
You would n't have this problem with Futurama .
Sure , Futurama could jump the shark .
But I bet it will last a lot longer than other series if given the chance .
Sure , Futurama could end up worse than before the break--much like Family Guy .
But I think Family Guy depended too much on edgy questionable humor and when it came back and still had that humor it just was n't as shocking .
And the gimmicks and long digresses got old and tedious .
I do n't think Futurama relies on these as much as Family Guy .
Anyways , that 's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was canceled .
That 's the only show I can say that about .
The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows .
Here 's to hoping it 's just as good as when it left off Season Four !
For the record normally I would complain about lack of originality in a situation like this but after watching some new shows on TV I do n't care .
Who ever is pitching/accepting these shows like The War at Home and 'til Death should be shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.
The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea.
I don't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama.
The show had a great format.
You had a mechanism for sending the crew anywhere where Professor Farnsworth would walk in saying "Good news everyone ... you're going to planet X to deliver package Y" with optional information about said planet.
From there, they could go anywhere.
Using a mechanism like this was a lot like Star Trek (although better than just Trek's "for the sake of discovery" in my opinion but I know that's a monkey shit fight I can't win).
And Star Trek (or some form of it) is still going strong on that same idea.
Hell, I'll bet there's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an uncountable number of planets so there's an uncountable number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed.
And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI.
I think the writers did a good job of keeping multiple plot arcs up and concentrating on them every now and then to keep the fans happy.
I think the first movie (Bender's Big Score) was a clear indication of how much they value development in plot arcs and connections between episodes.
To compare it to a show far past it's prime and in a similar format: The Simpsons.
The Simpsons has explored every possible crevice and building in Springfield to center on ... from the town sundial to the quarry to the statue of Jedediah Springfield to Springfield Gorge to the old folks home to the ... they have stretched that town out so badly that recent episodes seem to seep more into neighboring towns for a desperate change of pace.
You wouldn't have this problem with Futurama.
Sure, Futurama could jump the shark.
But I bet it will last a lot longer than other series if given the chance.
Sure, Futurama could end up worse than before the break--much like Family Guy.
But I think Family Guy depended too much on edgy questionable humor and when it came back and still had that humor it just wasn't as shocking.
And the gimmicks and long digresses got old and tedious.
I don't think Futurama relies on these as much as Family Guy.
Anyways, that's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was canceled.
That's the only show I can say that about.
The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows.
Here's to hoping it's just as good as when it left off Season Four!
For the record normally I would complain about lack of originality in a situation like this but after watching some new shows on TV I don't care.
Who ever is pitching/accepting these shows like The War at Home and 'til Death should be shot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281481</id>
	<title>Re:No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1244656260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1, Sad</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 , Sad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1, Sad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281015</id>
	<title>Re:Huh wha...?</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1244654520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least they're not Fox.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>By the way: Am I the only one who sees things like this:</p><p><i>Matt Groening is quoted as saying, 'We're thrilled Futurama is coming back. We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000.'</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and automatically pictures Groening's voice as Professor Farnsworth's?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least they 're not Fox .
; ) By the way : Am I the only one who sees things like this : Matt Groening is quoted as saying , 'We 're thrilled Futurama is coming back .
We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000 .
' ... and automatically pictures Groening 's voice as Professor Farnsworth 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least they're not Fox.
;)By the way: Am I the only one who sees things like this:Matt Groening is quoted as saying, 'We're thrilled Futurama is coming back.
We now have only 25,766 episodes to make before we catch up with Bender and Fry in the year 3000.
' ... and automatically pictures Groening's voice as Professor Farnsworth's?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290765</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>dword</author>
	<datestamp>1244715180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to Slashdot. I mean... What the fuck? You may say Dollhouse is crap (and I can't disagree, because I haven't seen it) but you get modded Insightful for such a comment? You should either got modded as Interesting. This is your own personal opinion - and maybe most Slashdotters have the same opinion, but it's an opinion. I can prove that Dollhouse was not crap because it was a movie. If it were a crap, it would have been in the toilet, literally and you would have gotten modded Informative. I know this is completely off-topic, but come on, mods, what the fuck? The parent was more like a Troll comment, but because Slashdot agrees with it doesn't make it Insightful. This has everything to do with personal taste and nothing to do with objectivity. It even bashes the show judging it by personal taste and forgets that someone actually liked it and believed in it. Unless it's common sense to say that the show completely sucked and there wasn't one rational person to find it worth watching, this was a bad mod day for Slashdot and a bad mood day for me.</p><p>Bye-bye, karma!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to Slashdot .
I mean... What the fuck ?
You may say Dollhouse is crap ( and I ca n't disagree , because I have n't seen it ) but you get modded Insightful for such a comment ?
You should either got modded as Interesting .
This is your own personal opinion - and maybe most Slashdotters have the same opinion , but it 's an opinion .
I can prove that Dollhouse was not crap because it was a movie .
If it were a crap , it would have been in the toilet , literally and you would have gotten modded Informative .
I know this is completely off-topic , but come on , mods , what the fuck ?
The parent was more like a Troll comment , but because Slashdot agrees with it does n't make it Insightful .
This has everything to do with personal taste and nothing to do with objectivity .
It even bashes the show judging it by personal taste and forgets that someone actually liked it and believed in it .
Unless it 's common sense to say that the show completely sucked and there was n't one rational person to find it worth watching , this was a bad mod day for Slashdot and a bad mood day for me.Bye-bye , karma !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to Slashdot.
I mean... What the fuck?
You may say Dollhouse is crap (and I can't disagree, because I haven't seen it) but you get modded Insightful for such a comment?
You should either got modded as Interesting.
This is your own personal opinion - and maybe most Slashdotters have the same opinion, but it's an opinion.
I can prove that Dollhouse was not crap because it was a movie.
If it were a crap, it would have been in the toilet, literally and you would have gotten modded Informative.
I know this is completely off-topic, but come on, mods, what the fuck?
The parent was more like a Troll comment, but because Slashdot agrees with it doesn't make it Insightful.
This has everything to do with personal taste and nothing to do with objectivity.
It even bashes the show judging it by personal taste and forgets that someone actually liked it and believed in it.
Unless it's common sense to say that the show completely sucked and there wasn't one rational person to find it worth watching, this was a bad mod day for Slashdot and a bad mood day for me.Bye-bye, karma!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279781</id>
	<title>Now, if only they'd establish a track record...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1244649060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... for not <b>giving up on everything else</b>...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... for not giving up on everything else... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for not giving up on everything else...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280677</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1244653200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can't take the sky from me...</p></div><p>But the Feds most definitely can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't take the sky from me...But the Feds most definitely can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't take the sky from me...But the Feds most definitely can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244652480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct.<br>Dollhouse is shit.</p><p>Firefly is also shit.  It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.  It's just so bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct.Dollhouse is shit.Firefly is also shit .
It was good the first time through , but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I ca n't go and rewatch it .
It 's just so bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct.Dollhouse is shit.Firefly is also shit.
It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.
It's just so bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28292939</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1244732100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firefly was crap.  Dollhouse on the other hand.... (you missed a dot)</p><p>See, i can express subjective opinions as if they were scientific facts too!</p><p>What else do you like that i can shit on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefly was crap .
Dollhouse on the other hand.... ( you missed a dot ) See , i can express subjective opinions as if they were scientific facts too ! What else do you like that i can shit on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefly was crap.
Dollhouse on the other hand.... (you missed a dot)See, i can express subjective opinions as if they were scientific facts too!What else do you like that i can shit on?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395</id>
	<title>Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Phoenix666</author>
	<datestamp>1244647620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the two movies that followed the series felt like the writers and voice actors were out of practice.  That said, this is Good News! indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the two movies that followed the series felt like the writers and voice actors were out of practice .
That said , this is Good News !
indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the two movies that followed the series felt like the writers and voice actors were out of practice.
That said, this is Good News!
indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280725</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world. New Futurama is always welcome.</p></div><p>The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/SPOILER, with just the ship and crew.<br>They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.</p></div><p>Oh please, if you're not seeing the "Zomg, the planet express crew is trapped in 2009 Old New York!" twist they're planning... well...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , if they can just treat the movies as non-canon , all will be right with the world .
New Futurama is always welcome.The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe /SPOILER , with just the ship and crew.They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.Oh please , if you 're not seeing the " Zomg , the planet express crew is trapped in 2009 Old New York !
" twist they 're planning... well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world.
New Futurama is always welcome.The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe /SPOILER, with just the ship and crew.They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.Oh please, if you're not seeing the "Zomg, the planet express crew is trapped in 2009 Old New York!
" twist they're planning... well...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281487</id>
	<title>Re:reboot</title>
	<author>Whyzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1244656320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This will be a reboot of Futurama<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... </i></p><p>Really? I wanna see that! Lets get Dot to play Leela. Phong will play the professor (Imagine the professor with a chinese accent and speaking in riddles). Bob will have to be Fry I suppose, with like a -100 intelligence. Matrix can play Bender, AndrAIa should be Amy Wong. I think it would be fun to make Megabyte play Zapp Brannigan, and of course Hexidecimal is MoM. SCSI can be Nibbler. And just for kicks we'll have Turbo play Kiff. Lets make lil' Enzo play Kiff's &amp; Amy's offspring...</p><p>Of course, this is plenty open to changes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be a reboot of Futurama ... Really ? I wan na see that !
Lets get Dot to play Leela .
Phong will play the professor ( Imagine the professor with a chinese accent and speaking in riddles ) .
Bob will have to be Fry I suppose , with like a -100 intelligence .
Matrix can play Bender , AndrAIa should be Amy Wong .
I think it would be fun to make Megabyte play Zapp Brannigan , and of course Hexidecimal is MoM .
SCSI can be Nibbler .
And just for kicks we 'll have Turbo play Kiff .
Lets make lil ' Enzo play Kiff 's &amp; Amy 's offspring...Of course , this is plenty open to changes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be a reboot of Futurama ... Really? I wanna see that!
Lets get Dot to play Leela.
Phong will play the professor (Imagine the professor with a chinese accent and speaking in riddles).
Bob will have to be Fry I suppose, with like a -100 intelligence.
Matrix can play Bender, AndrAIa should be Amy Wong.
I think it would be fun to make Megabyte play Zapp Brannigan, and of course Hexidecimal is MoM.
SCSI can be Nibbler.
And just for kicks we'll have Turbo play Kiff.
Lets make lil' Enzo play Kiff's &amp; Amy's offspring...Of course, this is plenty open to changes...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279505</id>
	<title>Can Futurama unjump the shark?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The important question is, who have they got down to write these new episodes?  The funny, sharp writers who made the show so good in seasons 1 and 2?  Or will they resort again to the lazy dimwits who made series 3 and 4 a disappointment?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The important question is , who have they got down to write these new episodes ?
The funny , sharp writers who made the show so good in seasons 1 and 2 ?
Or will they resort again to the lazy dimwits who made series 3 and 4 a disappointment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The important question is, who have they got down to write these new episodes?
The funny, sharp writers who made the show so good in seasons 1 and 2?
Or will they resort again to the lazy dimwits who made series 3 and 4 a disappointment?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279673</id>
	<title>Front Page News?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280701</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1244653320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?</p></div><p>Does it smell funny?



Maybe they could re-animate politics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows ? Does it smell funny ?
Maybe they could re-animate politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?Does it smell funny?
Maybe they could re-animate politics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290053</id>
	<title>Re:Let it die.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you're really saying is that you think that the show belongs to your child hood. Watching new episodes of Futurama reminds you of happier days in your life, which you feel has been lost forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you 're really saying is that you think that the show belongs to your child hood .
Watching new episodes of Futurama reminds you of happier days in your life , which you feel has been lost forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you're really saying is that you think that the show belongs to your child hood.
Watching new episodes of Futurama reminds you of happier days in your life, which you feel has been lost forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282897</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1244662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Firefly is also shit.  It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.  It's just so bad.</p></div><p>What ending? I haven't watched through the DVD's repeatedly, but I don't recall an ending, especially considering the show was canceled rather abruptly. I thought Serenity was really good, though it was a bit of a fuck-you to the people who were hoping for a series revival.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Firefly is also shit .
It was good the first time through , but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I ca n't go and rewatch it .
It 's just so bad.What ending ?
I have n't watched through the DVD 's repeatedly , but I do n't recall an ending , especially considering the show was canceled rather abruptly .
I thought Serenity was really good , though it was a bit of a fuck-you to the people who were hoping for a series revival .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firefly is also shit.
It was good the first time through, but the ending and the movie completely fucked it over so much that I can't go and rewatch it.
It's just so bad.What ending?
I haven't watched through the DVD's repeatedly, but I don't recall an ending, especially considering the show was canceled rather abruptly.
I thought Serenity was really good, though it was a bit of a fuck-you to the people who were hoping for a series revival.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415</id>
	<title>Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1244647680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been said before and is worth repeating: The movies were 45 minutes of material crammed into 90 minutes of airtime. The 22 minute format is the best way for the series to continue.</p><p>Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world. New Futurama is always welcome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been said before and is worth repeating : The movies were 45 minutes of material crammed into 90 minutes of airtime .
The 22 minute format is the best way for the series to continue.Now , if they can just treat the movies as non-canon , all will be right with the world .
New Futurama is always welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been said before and is worth repeating: The movies were 45 minutes of material crammed into 90 minutes of airtime.
The 22 minute format is the best way for the series to continue.Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world.
New Futurama is always welcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282571</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>TheoMurpse</author>
	<datestamp>1244660520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the Fox execs would revive shows.......but they are already in their pajamas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the Fox execs would revive shows.......but they are already in their pajamas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the Fox execs would revive shows.......but they are already in their pajamas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280715</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, you dn't like it, don't watch. Lots of people don't like it, they jsut don't have sucj a huge egoas to think anyone cares.</p><p>In Hollywood, it's 1 to 5. You can make 5 'paycheck' movies and long as you then do at least one 'good' one.</p><p>Or it used to be, but with Adam Sandler and Will Farrell still making bank, that rule might have been suspended~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , you d n't like it , do n't watch .
Lots of people do n't like it , they jsut do n't have sucj a huge egoas to think anyone cares.In Hollywood , it 's 1 to 5 .
You can make 5 'paycheck ' movies and long as you then do at least one 'good ' one.Or it used to be , but with Adam Sandler and Will Farrell still making bank , that rule might have been suspended ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, you dn't like it, don't watch.
Lots of people don't like it, they jsut don't have sucj a huge egoas to think anyone cares.In Hollywood, it's 1 to 5.
You can make 5 'paycheck' movies and long as you then do at least one 'good' one.Or it used to be, but with Adam Sandler and Will Farrell still making bank, that rule might have been suspended~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283015</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>nabsltd</author>
	<datestamp>1244662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.</p></div><p>Actually, it was entirely within the power of the <i>Futurama</i> creators (namely Matt Groening) to give Fox what they wanted to keep it on the air.</p><p>At the time <i>Futurama</i> was created, Groening had much more negotiating power (based on the success of <i>The Simpsons</i>), and kept a bigger cut of the merchandising for him and the production company.  This was the primary reason that Fox treated the show the way it did (scheduling, pre-empting, etc.).</p><p>Because Fox wasn't making as much money, it wasn't worth as much to them for the show to succeed.  This is still a pretty bitter point of contention bewteen the two sides.  You'll note that unlike <i>Family Guy</i>, <i>Futurama</i> isn't airing new episodes on Fox.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.Actually , it was entirely within the power of the Futurama creators ( namely Matt Groening ) to give Fox what they wanted to keep it on the air.At the time Futurama was created , Groening had much more negotiating power ( based on the success of The Simpsons ) , and kept a bigger cut of the merchandising for him and the production company .
This was the primary reason that Fox treated the show the way it did ( scheduling , pre-empting , etc .
) .Because Fox was n't making as much money , it was n't worth as much to them for the show to succeed .
This is still a pretty bitter point of contention bewteen the two sides .
You 'll note that unlike Family Guy , Futurama is n't airing new episodes on Fox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.Actually, it was entirely within the power of the Futurama creators (namely Matt Groening) to give Fox what they wanted to keep it on the air.At the time Futurama was created, Groening had much more negotiating power (based on the success of The Simpsons), and kept a bigger cut of the merchandising for him and the production company.
This was the primary reason that Fox treated the show the way it did (scheduling, pre-empting, etc.
).Because Fox wasn't making as much money, it wasn't worth as much to them for the show to succeed.
This is still a pretty bitter point of contention bewteen the two sides.
You'll note that unlike Family Guy, Futurama isn't airing new episodes on Fox.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28289119</id>
	<title>I can't wait!</title>
	<author>rehtonAesoohC</author>
	<datestamp>1244653200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, I bet they used some Torgo Executive Powder on the ratings people...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I bet they used some Torgo Executive Powder on the ratings people.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I bet they used some Torgo Executive Powder on the ratings people...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281013</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1244654520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it wasn't ratings. They just read my NSFW slashdot journals and found out that they got it all wrong. Leila's my daughter - first, they spelled her name wrong. Second, they got the wrong daughter; it isn't Leila but Patty. Third, it isn't that Patty has only one eye, she has both of them. It's her kidney that's missing.</p><p>And my robot does NOT say "bite my shiny metal ass." It's the cat, she says "GTFO my tail!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it was n't ratings .
They just read my NSFW slashdot journals and found out that they got it all wrong .
Leila 's my daughter - first , they spelled her name wrong .
Second , they got the wrong daughter ; it is n't Leila but Patty .
Third , it is n't that Patty has only one eye , she has both of them .
It 's her kidney that 's missing.And my robot does NOT say " bite my shiny metal ass .
" It 's the cat , she says " GTFO my tail !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it wasn't ratings.
They just read my NSFW slashdot journals and found out that they got it all wrong.
Leila's my daughter - first, they spelled her name wrong.
Second, they got the wrong daughter; it isn't Leila but Patty.
Third, it isn't that Patty has only one eye, she has both of them.
It's her kidney that's missing.And my robot does NOT say "bite my shiny metal ass.
" It's the cat, she says "GTFO my tail!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280199</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1244651100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Basically since Cartoon Network and DVD sales demonstrated that there was great profit in reanimating corpses.

One of the nice things about the trend to releasing TV shows via DVD is that if enough people buy them, the networks start to see dollar signs and are more apt to uncancel them. Admittedly it has to be fairly quick and it doesn't ensure that the show is any good after coming back, but it does give fans at least some hope of getting the show back.

Plus, they're zombie shows, and kids like zombies, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically since Cartoon Network and DVD sales demonstrated that there was great profit in reanimating corpses .
One of the nice things about the trend to releasing TV shows via DVD is that if enough people buy them , the networks start to see dollar signs and are more apt to uncancel them .
Admittedly it has to be fairly quick and it does n't ensure that the show is any good after coming back , but it does give fans at least some hope of getting the show back .
Plus , they 're zombie shows , and kids like zombies , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically since Cartoon Network and DVD sales demonstrated that there was great profit in reanimating corpses.
One of the nice things about the trend to releasing TV shows via DVD is that if enough people buy them, the networks start to see dollar signs and are more apt to uncancel them.
Admittedly it has to be fairly quick and it doesn't ensure that the show is any good after coming back, but it does give fans at least some hope of getting the show back.
Plus, they're zombie shows, and kids like zombies, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281697</id>
	<title>Re:Let it die.</title>
	<author>freakshowsam</author>
	<datestamp>1244657040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about all the gambling, booze, and hooker jokes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about all the gambling , booze , and hooker jokes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about all the gambling, booze, and hooker jokes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279691</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Captain Spam</author>
	<datestamp>1244648760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI.</p></div><p>I'm certain all the artists they have animating the show would be happy to hear that they're all working for free, since they're obviously not included in your budget plan.</p><p>And Futurama DOES use a lot of CGI effects (i.e. the New New York skyline shots).  They're just not too obvious and they fit in with the hand-drawn stuff.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And Futurama is animated so you 're not limited by budgets and CGI.I 'm certain all the artists they have animating the show would be happy to hear that they 're all working for free , since they 're obviously not included in your budget plan.And Futurama DOES use a lot of CGI effects ( i.e .
the New New York skyline shots ) .
They 're just not too obvious and they fit in with the hand-drawn stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI.I'm certain all the artists they have animating the show would be happy to hear that they're all working for free, since they're obviously not included in your budget plan.And Futurama DOES use a lot of CGI effects (i.e.
the New New York skyline shots).
They're just not too obvious and they fit in with the hand-drawn stuff.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491</id>
	<title>It's too late</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1244647980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too much time has passed.</p><p>The professor's probably dead by now, the kids will be all late teenagers, etc.</p><p>In Bender's case you can always put another guy in the costume but come on! Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too much time has passed.The professor 's probably dead by now , the kids will be all late teenagers , etc.In Bender 's case you can always put another guy in the costume but come on !
Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too much time has passed.The professor's probably dead by now, the kids will be all late teenagers, etc.In Bender's case you can always put another guy in the costume but come on!
Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280489</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>relguj9</author>
	<datestamp>1244652540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyways, that's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was canceled. That's the only show I can say that about. The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows. Here's to hoping it's just as good as when it left off Season Four!</p></div><p>I agree completely!  I watched this for the first time on Cartoon Network and got hooked and watched every episode that aired religiously until I had seen them all several times.<br> <br>

At the end of the day, Cartoon Network deserves a lot of credit for (yet again) resurrecting a once, but clearly undeservedly and prematurely, dead comedy cartoon.  I'm more excited about Futurama than I was about Family Guy though!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyways , that 's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was canceled .
That 's the only show I can say that about .
The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows .
Here 's to hoping it 's just as good as when it left off Season Four ! I agree completely !
I watched this for the first time on Cartoon Network and got hooked and watched every episode that aired religiously until I had seen them all several times .
At the end of the day , Cartoon Network deserves a lot of credit for ( yet again ) resurrecting a once , but clearly undeservedly and prematurely , dead comedy cartoon .
I 'm more excited about Futurama than I was about Family Guy though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyways, that's my largely opinionated two cents about a show I knew nothing about when it was airing and found it immensely enjoyable years after it was canceled.
That's the only show I can say that about.
The movies were ok but nothing like the TV formatted shows.
Here's to hoping it's just as good as when it left off Season Four!I agree completely!
I watched this for the first time on Cartoon Network and got hooked and watched every episode that aired religiously until I had seen them all several times.
At the end of the day, Cartoon Network deserves a lot of credit for (yet again) resurrecting a once, but clearly undeservedly and prematurely, dead comedy cartoon.
I'm more excited about Futurama than I was about Family Guy though!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288117</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244644440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>SCENE: Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.</p></div><p>This is where you lose all credibility. Family Guy doesn't have writers, it has manatees. Everybody knows that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>SCENE : Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.This is where you lose all credibility .
Family Guy does n't have writers , it has manatees .
Everybody knows that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SCENE: Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.This is where you lose all credibility.
Family Guy doesn't have writers, it has manatees.
Everybody knows that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141</id>
	<title>Let it die.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244650860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really like Futurama; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies. However, I think this series should rest in peace. It's over.</p><p>The series was great and got progressively better as time went on. However, if the movies are any indication the revived series will be crap. Each movie was worse than the last. They weren't particularly creative with the stories and overall the writing overwrought and not compelling. There was so much untapped potential in the series but instead the movies degraded into pathetic, poorly executed fan service. Some jokes were quite funny but otherwise I felt like they were trying too hard to recreate Family Guy and Adult Swim's brand of humor. And probably the most obnoxious part was the constant environmentalist proselytizing. Some episodes used Al Gore and that theme to great effect but Bender's Game, in particular, was about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the crotch.</p><p>However, I am a sucker for Futurama, so I'll definitely watch. But if it ends up being the same kind of crap I saw in the movies I wont be watching for long.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like Futurama ; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies .
However , I think this series should rest in peace .
It 's over.The series was great and got progressively better as time went on .
However , if the movies are any indication the revived series will be crap .
Each movie was worse than the last .
They were n't particularly creative with the stories and overall the writing overwrought and not compelling .
There was so much untapped potential in the series but instead the movies degraded into pathetic , poorly executed fan service .
Some jokes were quite funny but otherwise I felt like they were trying too hard to recreate Family Guy and Adult Swim 's brand of humor .
And probably the most obnoxious part was the constant environmentalist proselytizing .
Some episodes used Al Gore and that theme to great effect but Bender 's Game , in particular , was about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the crotch.However , I am a sucker for Futurama , so I 'll definitely watch .
But if it ends up being the same kind of crap I saw in the movies I wont be watching for long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like Futurama; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies.
However, I think this series should rest in peace.
It's over.The series was great and got progressively better as time went on.
However, if the movies are any indication the revived series will be crap.
Each movie was worse than the last.
They weren't particularly creative with the stories and overall the writing overwrought and not compelling.
There was so much untapped potential in the series but instead the movies degraded into pathetic, poorly executed fan service.
Some jokes were quite funny but otherwise I felt like they were trying too hard to recreate Family Guy and Adult Swim's brand of humor.
And probably the most obnoxious part was the constant environmentalist proselytizing.
Some episodes used Al Gore and that theme to great effect but Bender's Game, in particular, was about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the crotch.However, I am a sucker for Futurama, so I'll definitely watch.
But if it ends up being the same kind of crap I saw in the movies I wont be watching for long.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280269</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244651400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You say that like that doesn't apply to every single show that is on for more than a single season.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You say that like that does n't apply to every single show that is on for more than a single season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You say that like that doesn't apply to every single show that is on for more than a single season.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244651100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it's selective perception to protect the mind.</p><p>After all, there has been <i>only one</i> Star Wars trilogy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's selective perception to protect the mind.After all , there has been only one Star Wars trilogy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's selective perception to protect the mind.After all, there has been only one Star Wars trilogy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28289297</id>
	<title>Why Futurama is different (and better)</title>
	<author>xx01dk</author>
	<datestamp>1244655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the nerd humor. My all time fav is the one where it starts out with Nibbler drinking an entire swimming pool and then burping out the resultant chlorine gas. Everyone drops to the ground, knocked out by the poison gas, and Bender is left there laughing at the plight of the "meatbags" until he goes (with classic comic timing): "Oh wait, chlorine..." and then is nearly immediately covered in rust and succumbs as well.

Oh wait, found it!

<a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/65768/futurama-chlorine" title="hulu.com">http://www.hulu.com/watch/65768/futurama-chlorine</a> [hulu.com]

The best, imho. Followed closely by the Asteroids episode. *chuckle*</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the nerd humor .
My all time fav is the one where it starts out with Nibbler drinking an entire swimming pool and then burping out the resultant chlorine gas .
Everyone drops to the ground , knocked out by the poison gas , and Bender is left there laughing at the plight of the " meatbags " until he goes ( with classic comic timing ) : " Oh wait , chlorine... " and then is nearly immediately covered in rust and succumbs as well .
Oh wait , found it !
http : //www.hulu.com/watch/65768/futurama-chlorine [ hulu.com ] The best , imho .
Followed closely by the Asteroids episode .
* chuckle *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the nerd humor.
My all time fav is the one where it starts out with Nibbler drinking an entire swimming pool and then burping out the resultant chlorine gas.
Everyone drops to the ground, knocked out by the poison gas, and Bender is left there laughing at the plight of the "meatbags" until he goes (with classic comic timing): "Oh wait, chlorine..." and then is nearly immediately covered in rust and succumbs as well.
Oh wait, found it!
http://www.hulu.com/watch/65768/futurama-chlorine [hulu.com]

The best, imho.
Followed closely by the Asteroids episode.
*chuckle*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28286025</id>
	<title>Hope they're better than the movies....</title>
	<author>otis wildflower</author>
	<datestamp>1244631120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having seen at least 2 of the movies (Bender's Big Score and the Beast with a Billion Backs), I'd say that any 4 random classic Futurama episodes put together gave me more laughs and pleasure than the movies did.  Perhaps Futurama doesn't scale, so I've got hopes that these eps represent a return to classic form...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having seen at least 2 of the movies ( Bender 's Big Score and the Beast with a Billion Backs ) , I 'd say that any 4 random classic Futurama episodes put together gave me more laughs and pleasure than the movies did .
Perhaps Futurama does n't scale , so I 've got hopes that these eps represent a return to classic form.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having seen at least 2 of the movies (Bender's Big Score and the Beast with a Billion Backs), I'd say that any 4 random classic Futurama episodes put together gave me more laughs and pleasure than the movies did.
Perhaps Futurama doesn't scale, so I've got hopes that these eps represent a return to classic form...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279671</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Palshife</author>
	<datestamp>1244648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3. 3. HTML ordered lists already number themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3 .
3. HTML ordered lists already number themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3.
3. HTML ordered lists already number themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280781</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244653620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like Dollhouse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like Dollhouse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like Dollhouse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280581</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1244652900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Frank Herbert wrote all 6 Dune books!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Frank Herbert wrote all 6 Dune books !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Frank Herbert wrote all 6 Dune books!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283467</id>
	<title>More quotes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Huh. Did everything just taste purple for a second?"<br>- Fry, Futurama</p><p>"Why am I sticky and naked? Did I miss something fun?"<br>- Fry, Futurama</p><p>"Now that's a wave of destruction that's easy on the eyes!"<br>- Zapp Brannigan, Futurama</p><p>"I am the man with no name. Zap Brannigan at your service."<br>- Zapp Brannigan, Futurama</p><p>More here:<br><a href="http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama" title="quoteaddict.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama</a> [quoteaddict.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Huh .
Did everything just taste purple for a second ?
" - Fry , Futurama " Why am I sticky and naked ?
Did I miss something fun ?
" - Fry , Futurama " Now that 's a wave of destruction that 's easy on the eyes !
" - Zapp Brannigan , Futurama " I am the man with no name .
Zap Brannigan at your service .
" - Zapp Brannigan , FuturamaMore here : http : //www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php ? search = futurama [ quoteaddict.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Huh.
Did everything just taste purple for a second?
"- Fry, Futurama"Why am I sticky and naked?
Did I miss something fun?
"- Fry, Futurama"Now that's a wave of destruction that's easy on the eyes!
"- Zapp Brannigan, Futurama"I am the man with no name.
Zap Brannigan at your service.
"- Zapp Brannigan, FuturamaMore here:http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama [quoteaddict.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28286957</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1244636220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, ratings do matter. All that matters is ratings, but you cant keep pre-empting the show with football and who knows what else. Pre-tivo people needed a set time to tune in. They didnt get it often enough with futurama and Fox pretty much pissed away its potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , ratings do matter .
All that matters is ratings , but you cant keep pre-empting the show with football and who knows what else .
Pre-tivo people needed a set time to tune in .
They didnt get it often enough with futurama and Fox pretty much pissed away its potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, ratings do matter.
All that matters is ratings, but you cant keep pre-empting the show with football and who knows what else.
Pre-tivo people needed a set time to tune in.
They didnt get it often enough with futurama and Fox pretty much pissed away its potential.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279427</id>
	<title>Dear Mr. Groening</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244647800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please don't turn Futurama into the politically correct fiasco that The Simpsons has become. I honestly fear for this show after seeing the current The Simpsons season.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do n't turn Futurama into the politically correct fiasco that The Simpsons has become .
I honestly fear for this show after seeing the current The Simpsons season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please don't turn Futurama into the politically correct fiasco that The Simpsons has become.
I honestly fear for this show after seeing the current The Simpsons season.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281393</id>
	<title>You have selected "Slow and Horrible"</title>
	<author>Slightly Askew</author>
	<datestamp>1244655900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281533</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>socrplayr813</author>
	<datestamp>1244656500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does it for me is that Futurama utilizes some fairly intelligent humor, without going so far as to set itself above or beyond its audience.  It also successfully mixes in small amounts of shock and surprise humor (ala Family Guy, but usually more subtle).  I think they've also got just the right number/mix of characters.  It lets them change things up without constantly introducing new people or wearing out and overextending their main characters.  Their use of stereotypes and cliches helps them keep things familiar, but with enough surprises added in to keep it from getting overly stale.</p><p>Like a lot of people, I was barely aware of its existence when it was still running, but I picked it up late in the game and kept watching after it was canceled.  For a long time, I watched 1-2 reruns a night before bed.  They've gotten tedious now, but for me to be able to rewatch them so much says something.  There are very few shows that I can do that with.  I can almost recite some episodes.</p><p>The only complaints I've heard consistently are:<br>1. That it's based in the future/in space, but some people just have a bias against that kind of thing.  Nothing to be done about it.<br>2. "It's just like the Simpsons/Family Guy/American Dad."  That, of course, is a joke, with the exception of them all being [young?] adult-oriented cartoons.  I find it especially funny because Futurama was already well into production by the time Family Guy was out and American Dad didn't exist at all.</p><p>Sometimes I wish I knew what was going on in execs' heads so that I could understand why they cancel shows like Futurama, Firefly, etc.  I tend to assume it's because they're considered by many to be science fiction (true or not, that's often the perception), but I don't know...  Anyway, then I come to my senses and realize that I'm insane enough without adding Fox network exec thoughts to my overly-active brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it for me is that Futurama utilizes some fairly intelligent humor , without going so far as to set itself above or beyond its audience .
It also successfully mixes in small amounts of shock and surprise humor ( ala Family Guy , but usually more subtle ) .
I think they 've also got just the right number/mix of characters .
It lets them change things up without constantly introducing new people or wearing out and overextending their main characters .
Their use of stereotypes and cliches helps them keep things familiar , but with enough surprises added in to keep it from getting overly stale.Like a lot of people , I was barely aware of its existence when it was still running , but I picked it up late in the game and kept watching after it was canceled .
For a long time , I watched 1-2 reruns a night before bed .
They 've gotten tedious now , but for me to be able to rewatch them so much says something .
There are very few shows that I can do that with .
I can almost recite some episodes.The only complaints I 've heard consistently are : 1 .
That it 's based in the future/in space , but some people just have a bias against that kind of thing .
Nothing to be done about it.2 .
" It 's just like the Simpsons/Family Guy/American Dad .
" That , of course , is a joke , with the exception of them all being [ young ?
] adult-oriented cartoons .
I find it especially funny because Futurama was already well into production by the time Family Guy was out and American Dad did n't exist at all.Sometimes I wish I knew what was going on in execs ' heads so that I could understand why they cancel shows like Futurama , Firefly , etc .
I tend to assume it 's because they 're considered by many to be science fiction ( true or not , that 's often the perception ) , but I do n't know... Anyway , then I come to my senses and realize that I 'm insane enough without adding Fox network exec thoughts to my overly-active brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it for me is that Futurama utilizes some fairly intelligent humor, without going so far as to set itself above or beyond its audience.
It also successfully mixes in small amounts of shock and surprise humor (ala Family Guy, but usually more subtle).
I think they've also got just the right number/mix of characters.
It lets them change things up without constantly introducing new people or wearing out and overextending their main characters.
Their use of stereotypes and cliches helps them keep things familiar, but with enough surprises added in to keep it from getting overly stale.Like a lot of people, I was barely aware of its existence when it was still running, but I picked it up late in the game and kept watching after it was canceled.
For a long time, I watched 1-2 reruns a night before bed.
They've gotten tedious now, but for me to be able to rewatch them so much says something.
There are very few shows that I can do that with.
I can almost recite some episodes.The only complaints I've heard consistently are:1.
That it's based in the future/in space, but some people just have a bias against that kind of thing.
Nothing to be done about it.2.
"It's just like the Simpsons/Family Guy/American Dad.
"  That, of course, is a joke, with the exception of them all being [young?
] adult-oriented cartoons.
I find it especially funny because Futurama was already well into production by the time Family Guy was out and American Dad didn't exist at all.Sometimes I wish I knew what was going on in execs' heads so that I could understand why they cancel shows like Futurama, Firefly, etc.
I tend to assume it's because they're considered by many to be science fiction (true or not, that's often the perception), but I don't know...  Anyway, then I come to my senses and realize that I'm insane enough without adding Fox network exec thoughts to my overly-active brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281065</id>
	<title>Rough Draft Studios Rocks!</title>
	<author>billybob\_jcv</author>
	<datestamp>1244654640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big fan of Scott &amp; Greg Vanzo, Peter Avanzino, Claudia Katz and the rest of the crew!  <a href="http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/" title="roughdraftstudios.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/</a> [roughdraftstudios.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big fan of Scott &amp; Greg Vanzo , Peter Avanzino , Claudia Katz and the rest of the crew !
http : //www.roughdraftstudios.com/ [ roughdraftstudios.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big fan of Scott &amp; Greg Vanzo, Peter Avanzino, Claudia Katz and the rest of the crew!
http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/ [roughdraftstudios.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1244650380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two movies?  Try four:</p><p>Bender's Big Score<br>The Beast With A Billion Backs<br>Bender's Big Game<br>Into The Wild Green Yonder</p><p>And I wouldn't say the writers were out of practice, so much as they weren't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece (the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie).  Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments.  It'll be nice to see them return to that format.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two movies ?
Try four : Bender 's Big ScoreThe Beast With A Billion BacksBender 's Big GameInto The Wild Green YonderAnd I would n't say the writers were out of practice , so much as they were n't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece ( the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie ) .
Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments .
It 'll be nice to see them return to that format .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two movies?
Try four:Bender's Big ScoreThe Beast With A Billion BacksBender's Big GameInto The Wild Green YonderAnd I wouldn't say the writers were out of practice, so much as they weren't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece (the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie).
Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments.
It'll be nice to see them return to that format.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282111</id>
	<title>BENDER SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED ON TELEVISION (n/t)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>blah blah blah.  and furthermore blah blah.

Blah?  Nah.  Blah blah dah bah pah rah tah.</htmltext>
<tokenext>blah blah blah .
and furthermore blah blah .
Blah ? Nah .
Blah blah dah bah pah rah tah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blah blah blah.
and furthermore blah blah.
Blah?  Nah.
Blah blah dah bah pah rah tah.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282093</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem there is that Dollhouse <b>sucks</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem there is that Dollhouse sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem there is that Dollhouse sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279805</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>PoliticalGamer</author>
	<datestamp>1244649180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that mean Firefly will be back?
*looks wistfully into the distance*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean Firefly will be back ?
* looks wistfully into the distance *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean Firefly will be back?
*looks wistfully into the distance*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Drakkenmensch</author>
	<datestamp>1244648400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The morons who cancelled us not only got fired, but also got beaten! <i>Badly!</i>"</p></div><p>The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule. Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit, he'd just move it around, keeping prime slots for his own pet projects. Fast forward six months, change execs again, repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options. Good shows get lost in the cracks.</p><p>
"This is executive Alpha, programmed to like things he's seen before." <br>
"Hey hey hey!"<br>
"This is executive Beta, programmed to underestimate the audience."<br>
"It's funny, but how will it go with farmers?"<br>
"And this is executive Gamma, programmed to roll dice to determine the schedule."<br>
*rolls dice* "MORE REALITY SHOWS!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The morons who cancelled us not only got fired , but also got beaten !
Badly ! " The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule .
Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit , he 'd just move it around , keeping prime slots for his own pet projects .
Fast forward six months , change execs again , repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options .
Good shows get lost in the cracks .
" This is executive Alpha , programmed to like things he 's seen before .
" " Hey hey hey !
" " This is executive Beta , programmed to underestimate the audience .
" " It 's funny , but how will it go with farmers ?
" " And this is executive Gamma , programmed to roll dice to determine the schedule .
" * rolls dice * " MORE REALITY SHOWS !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The morons who cancelled us not only got fired, but also got beaten!
Badly!"The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule.
Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit, he'd just move it around, keeping prime slots for his own pet projects.
Fast forward six months, change execs again, repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options.
Good shows get lost in the cracks.
"This is executive Alpha, programmed to like things he's seen before.
" 
"Hey hey hey!
"
"This is executive Beta, programmed to underestimate the audience.
"
"It's funny, but how will it go with farmers?
"
"And this is executive Gamma, programmed to roll dice to determine the schedule.
"
*rolls dice* "MORE REALITY SHOWS!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, Dollhouse is crap. Firefly, on the other hand...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , Dollhouse is crap .
Firefly , on the other hand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, Dollhouse is crap.
Firefly, on the other hand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281895</id>
	<title>Best news I've read all day...</title>
	<author>WagonWheelsRX8</author>
	<datestamp>1244657820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah that's pretty much it...seen a lot of junk and to read a show that I still enjoy watching is going to get a few extra seasons makes for a good day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah that 's pretty much it...seen a lot of junk and to read a show that I still enjoy watching is going to get a few extra seasons makes for a good day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah that's pretty much it...seen a lot of junk and to read a show that I still enjoy watching is going to get a few extra seasons makes for a good day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279545</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244648220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI...</p><p>Actually most animation is now computer driven so it is actually CGI but considerably cheaper then the old animation methods. 2-D CGI is still CGI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...And Futurama is animated so you 're not limited by budgets and CGI...Actually most animation is now computer driven so it is actually CGI but considerably cheaper then the old animation methods .
2-D CGI is still CGI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And Futurama is animated so you're not limited by budgets and CGI...Actually most animation is now computer driven so it is actually CGI but considerably cheaper then the old animation methods.
2-D CGI is still CGI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283033</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>necromancers on retainer. the other networks have to pay big premiums because they don't keep them on retainer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>necromancers on retainer .
the other networks have to pay big premiums because they do n't keep them on retainer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>necromancers on retainer.
the other networks have to pay big premiums because they don't keep them on retainer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281439</id>
	<title>Re:No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1244656080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make sure you try drugs, travel, a cult or two, and organized crime before you decide to step once more into the suicide booth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make sure you try drugs , travel , a cult or two , and organized crime before you decide to step once more into the suicide booth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make sure you try drugs, travel, a cult or two, and organized crime before you decide to step once more into the suicide booth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281601</id>
	<title>Re:Let it die.</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1244656740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really like Futurama; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies. However, I think this series should rest in peace. It's over.</p></div><p>Look, if you don't want to watch it, don't watch it. For example, I haven't seen the H2G2 movie because I don't want it to spoil the way I remember H2G2.</p><p>But don't deprive the rest of us from seeing what we want to see. It might turn out to be really good, and I think that's a good chance to take.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like Futurama ; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies .
However , I think this series should rest in peace .
It 's over.Look , if you do n't want to watch it , do n't watch it .
For example , I have n't seen the H2G2 movie because I do n't want it to spoil the way I remember H2G2.But do n't deprive the rest of us from seeing what we want to see .
It might turn out to be really good , and I think that 's a good chance to take.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like Futurama; I have all four DVD sets and the four movies.
However, I think this series should rest in peace.
It's over.Look, if you don't want to watch it, don't watch it.
For example, I haven't seen the H2G2 movie because I don't want it to spoil the way I remember H2G2.But don't deprive the rest of us from seeing what we want to see.
It might turn out to be really good, and I think that's a good chance to take.- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280721</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1244653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>"The morons who cancelled us not only got fired, but also got beaten! Badly!"</p></div></blockquote><p>The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule. Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit, he'd just move it around, keeping prime slots for his own pet projects. Fast forward six months, change execs again, repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options. Good shows get lost in the cracks.</p></div></blockquote><p>The other issue is that sports often pre-empted Futurama (and many other shows), or in some timezones, extended over it. So even if you knew when Futurama was supposed to be on (<strong>that week</strong>), there's a good chance it would get pre-empted anyhow. This often led to seasons being cut short because not only did the timeslot move constantly, but the show would be aired erratically.</p><p>It's not like Fox doesn't have uh, Fox <strong>Sports</strong> to show that stuff on... those not interested catch it close to live, those who want to watch sports (always live) can use their DVRs or VCRs to record the programming as normal.</p><p>The Fox network is probably why people need DVRs to keep track of the constant schedule shifts, and have those DVRs check almost hourly to ensure shows are still going to be aired and not pre-empted by something else. And Fox will then still screw it up.</p><p>For those not blessed with DVRs (they were fairly new and unusual nearly a decade ago), it was trivially easy to miss a new episode of Futurama thinking spotrs would be on, or trying to catch Futurama and catching the end of football or something. At least there were several enterprising people back then putting up episodes for download...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The morons who cancelled us not only got fired , but also got beaten !
Badly ! " The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule .
Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit , he 'd just move it around , keeping prime slots for his own pet projects .
Fast forward six months , change execs again , repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options .
Good shows get lost in the cracks.The other issue is that sports often pre-empted Futurama ( and many other shows ) , or in some timezones , extended over it .
So even if you knew when Futurama was supposed to be on ( that week ) , there 's a good chance it would get pre-empted anyhow .
This often led to seasons being cut short because not only did the timeslot move constantly , but the show would be aired erratically.It 's not like Fox does n't have uh , Fox Sports to show that stuff on... those not interested catch it close to live , those who want to watch sports ( always live ) can use their DVRs or VCRs to record the programming as normal.The Fox network is probably why people need DVRs to keep track of the constant schedule shifts , and have those DVRs check almost hourly to ensure shows are still going to be aired and not pre-empted by something else .
And Fox will then still screw it up.For those not blessed with DVRs ( they were fairly new and unusual nearly a decade ago ) , it was trivially easy to miss a new episode of Futurama thinking spotrs would be on , or trying to catch Futurama and catching the end of football or something .
At least there were several enterprising people back then putting up episodes for download.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The morons who cancelled us not only got fired, but also got beaten!
Badly!"The biggest problem plaguing Fox was the constant shuffling of executives in charge of the schedule.
Because the new guy in place feared that a succesful show implemented by its predecessor would not give HIM credit, he'd just move it around, keeping prime slots for his own pet projects.
Fast forward six months, change execs again, repeat until your schedule is a stinker parade surrounding a few scant barely palatable options.
Good shows get lost in the cracks.The other issue is that sports often pre-empted Futurama (and many other shows), or in some timezones, extended over it.
So even if you knew when Futurama was supposed to be on (that week), there's a good chance it would get pre-empted anyhow.
This often led to seasons being cut short because not only did the timeslot move constantly, but the show would be aired erratically.It's not like Fox doesn't have uh, Fox Sports to show that stuff on... those not interested catch it close to live, those who want to watch sports (always live) can use their DVRs or VCRs to record the programming as normal.The Fox network is probably why people need DVRs to keep track of the constant schedule shifts, and have those DVRs check almost hourly to ensure shows are still going to be aired and not pre-empted by something else.
And Fox will then still screw it up.For those not blessed with DVRs (they were fairly new and unusual nearly a decade ago), it was trivially easy to miss a new episode of Futurama thinking spotrs would be on, or trying to catch Futurama and catching the end of football or something.
At least there were several enterprising people back then putting up episodes for download...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</id>
	<title>Awesome...</title>
	<author>GigaHurtsMyRobot</author>
	<datestamp>1244647500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281789</id>
	<title>Kinda forgot about CC...</title>
	<author>IlluminatedOne</author>
	<datestamp>1244657460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the only show they offer that I know and/or care about seeing is South Park and I watch that online cuz the wife HATES it, I kinda forgot about Comedy Central. I think the main reason really is that they are not offered in HD around here (FIOS). Do many of you have it available in HD? I very rarely scan through the non-HD offerings...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the only show they offer that I know and/or care about seeing is South Park and I watch that online cuz the wife HATES it , I kinda forgot about Comedy Central .
I think the main reason really is that they are not offered in HD around here ( FIOS ) .
Do many of you have it available in HD ?
I very rarely scan through the non-HD offerings.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the only show they offer that I know and/or care about seeing is South Park and I watch that online cuz the wife HATES it, I kinda forgot about Comedy Central.
I think the main reason really is that they are not offered in HD around here (FIOS).
Do many of you have it available in HD?
I very rarely scan through the non-HD offerings...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281483</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>xonar</author>
	<datestamp>1244656260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I usually assume this for many series'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I usually assume this for many series' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I usually assume this for many series'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280079</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244650560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which "two"?  The first two?  The last two?  Numbers 1 and 4?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which " two " ?
The first two ?
The last two ?
Numbers 1 and 4 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which "two"?
The first two?
The last two?
Numbers 1 and 4?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282893</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And thank goodness there were no sequels to The Matrix.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And thank goodness there were no sequels to The Matrix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And thank goodness there were no sequels to The Matrix.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279829</id>
	<title>Yes, this show is awesome</title>
	<author>Murdoch5</author>
	<datestamp>1244649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who cares why it's coming back, the point is it is coming back!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares why it 's coming back , the point is it is coming back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares why it's coming back, the point is it is coming back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283253</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1244663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Family Guy writers are just a bunch of manatees with a tank of word balls. What more do you expect?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Family Guy writers are just a bunch of manatees with a tank of word balls .
What more do you expect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Family Guy writers are just a bunch of manatees with a tank of word balls.
What more do you expect?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279387</id>
	<title>Good news, everyone!</title>
	<author>cheezitman2001</author>
	<datestamp>1244647560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tomorrow, you'll all be making a delivery to Ebola 9, the virus planet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tomorrow , you 'll all be making a delivery to Ebola 9 , the virus planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tomorrow, you'll all be making a delivery to Ebola 9, the virus planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280891</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244653980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.  The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea.  I don't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama.</p></div><p>They do this to any decent show with a primarily "cult" following. If they can't move it to 1am on a Sunday (AKA Firefly) and maintain "decent" ratings then apparently the following just isn't big enough for them. They have done this (or similar) with Firefly, Futurama, Angel, and more recently Dollhouse and Sarah Connor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power .
The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea .
I do n't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama.They do this to any decent show with a primarily " cult " following .
If they ca n't move it to 1am on a Sunday ( AKA Firefly ) and maintain " decent " ratings then apparently the following just is n't big enough for them .
They have done this ( or similar ) with Firefly , Futurama , Angel , and more recently Dollhouse and Sarah Connor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm convinced Futurama was not canceled for any reason within its power.
The powers that be at Fox seemed to think that moving its time slot around so no one knew when it was on was a great idea.
I don't know how the politics work there within the scheduling and piloting areas of Fox but someone must have had a problem with Futurama.They do this to any decent show with a primarily "cult" following.
If they can't move it to 1am on a Sunday (AKA Firefly) and maintain "decent" ratings then apparently the following just isn't big enough for them.
They have done this (or similar) with Firefly, Futurama, Angel, and more recently Dollhouse and Sarah Connor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279767</id>
	<title>Dammit!</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1244649060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just finished watching every episode of that show, and thought I was done.  You mean to tell me there's going to be MOAR?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just finished watching every episode of that show , and thought I was done .
You mean to tell me there 's going to be MOAR ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just finished watching every episode of that show, and thought I was done.
You mean to tell me there's going to be MOAR?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280149</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1244650860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Family Guy" is the Denzel Washington of animated series. At one point, it was fresh and original.</p><p>But then it became huge. Now everyone loves it because it's "Family Guy." Stewie's gonna say something gay, there's gonna be thirty "like that time I was..." jokes that are sorta mildly amusing. Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh (Blue Harvest), but then it's back into the routine. Or the 'new' just gets recycled into the routine (like the Shawshank parody.)</p><p>Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor. He's played "Morally right guy that the establishment doesn't like / believe / trust" in like twenty movies now. Every once in a while he steps out and it's fantastic (Training Day), but then he turns around and makes "Man on Fire" three more times for the paychecks.</p></div><p>I think that FG's parodies, best exemplified in "Blue Harvest," suffer from the writing staff's lack of experience writing scenes other than "like that time I was..." jokes.  Compare Blue Harvest with the Robot Chicken Star Wars special and you see FG following the original plot and dialog with occasional slight tweaks.  When they digress heavily, and they only do it a handful of times, they end up doing rather unsuccessful versions of their normal non sequiturs.  Robot Chicken, on the other hand, showed a great deal of creativity.  It actually came up with new ideas in the setting of Star Wars, where FG mostly just drew the original Star Wars movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Family Guy " is the Denzel Washington of animated series .
At one point , it was fresh and original.But then it became huge .
Now everyone loves it because it 's " Family Guy .
" Stewie 's gon na say something gay , there 's gon na be thirty " like that time I was... " jokes that are sorta mildly amusing .
Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh ( Blue Harvest ) , but then it 's back into the routine .
Or the 'new ' just gets recycled into the routine ( like the Shawshank parody .
) Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor .
He 's played " Morally right guy that the establishment does n't like / believe / trust " in like twenty movies now .
Every once in a while he steps out and it 's fantastic ( Training Day ) , but then he turns around and makes " Man on Fire " three more times for the paychecks.I think that FG 's parodies , best exemplified in " Blue Harvest , " suffer from the writing staff 's lack of experience writing scenes other than " like that time I was... " jokes .
Compare Blue Harvest with the Robot Chicken Star Wars special and you see FG following the original plot and dialog with occasional slight tweaks .
When they digress heavily , and they only do it a handful of times , they end up doing rather unsuccessful versions of their normal non sequiturs .
Robot Chicken , on the other hand , showed a great deal of creativity .
It actually came up with new ideas in the setting of Star Wars , where FG mostly just drew the original Star Wars movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Family Guy" is the Denzel Washington of animated series.
At one point, it was fresh and original.But then it became huge.
Now everyone loves it because it's "Family Guy.
" Stewie's gonna say something gay, there's gonna be thirty "like that time I was..." jokes that are sorta mildly amusing.
Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh (Blue Harvest), but then it's back into the routine.
Or the 'new' just gets recycled into the routine (like the Shawshank parody.
)Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor.
He's played "Morally right guy that the establishment doesn't like / believe / trust" in like twenty movies now.
Every once in a while he steps out and it's fantastic (Training Day), but then he turns around and makes "Man on Fire" three more times for the paychecks.I think that FG's parodies, best exemplified in "Blue Harvest," suffer from the writing staff's lack of experience writing scenes other than "like that time I was..." jokes.
Compare Blue Harvest with the Robot Chicken Star Wars special and you see FG following the original plot and dialog with occasional slight tweaks.
When they digress heavily, and they only do it a handful of times, they end up doing rather unsuccessful versions of their normal non sequiturs.
Robot Chicken, on the other hand, showed a great deal of creativity.
It actually came up with new ideas in the setting of Star Wars, where FG mostly just drew the original Star Wars movie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281127</id>
	<title>Re:Can Futurama unjump the shark?</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1244654880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lest ye forget "Where No Fan Has Gone Before"
<br> <br>
Robots don't say "ye"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lest ye forget " Where No Fan Has Gone Before " Robots do n't say " ye "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lest ye forget "Where No Fan Has Gone Before"
 
Robots don't say "ye"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279377</id>
	<title>Futurama sucks more than Linux</title>
	<author>linustorvaldsisaturd</author>
	<datestamp>1244647560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux just isn't ready for the desktop yet. It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average computer user isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere. The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing me my OS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux just is n't ready for the desktop yet .
It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web , but the average computer user is n't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with , especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation , as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother 's basement somewhere .
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf ( haha ) providing me my OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux just isn't ready for the desktop yet.
It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average computer user isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere.
The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing me my OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281647</id>
	<title>Re:Hope they warm up before starting</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1244656920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And I wouldn't say the writers were out of practice, so much as they weren't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece (the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie).  Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments.  It'll be nice to see them return to that format.</p></div><p>I totally agree. The movies weren't horrible, by any means - but it seemed that writing much longer stories than they're used to, combined with the directive that somehow they should also be able to chop these longer stories into half-hour segments, did not work all that well. There were plenty of reminders of why it was a great show, but what makes Futurama work just doesn't translate well to feature-length stories.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I would n't say the writers were out of practice , so much as they were n't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece ( the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie ) .
Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments .
It 'll be nice to see them return to that format.I totally agree .
The movies were n't horrible , by any means - but it seemed that writing much longer stories than they 're used to , combined with the directive that somehow they should also be able to chop these longer stories into half-hour segments , did not work all that well .
There were plenty of reminders of why it was a great show , but what makes Futurama work just does n't translate well to feature-length stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I wouldn't say the writers were out of practice, so much as they weren't used to writing a 90-minute feature-length piece (the same problem is evident in the Simpsons movie).
Futurama excelled in 22-minute installments.
It'll be nice to see them return to that format.I totally agree.
The movies weren't horrible, by any means - but it seemed that writing much longer stories than they're used to, combined with the directive that somehow they should also be able to chop these longer stories into half-hour segments, did not work all that well.
There were plenty of reminders of why it was a great show, but what makes Futurama work just doesn't translate well to feature-length stories.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288587</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1244648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.</p></div><p>Actually, I believe it's been established that he is an alien who likes to suck your goobrain, and that's just how they roll.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.Actually , I believe it 's been established that he is an alien who likes to suck your goobrain , and that 's just how they roll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.Actually, I believe it's been established that he is an alien who likes to suck your goobrain, and that's just how they roll.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281239</id>
	<title>Re:No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1244655300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're 15? Even if not, guess what pal, that's what life <i>IS</i>, a series of setbacks out of your control.  If you're not funky enough to be a Globetrotter, deal with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're 15 ?
Even if not , guess what pal , that 's what life IS , a series of setbacks out of your control .
If you 're not funky enough to be a Globetrotter , deal with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're 15?
Even if not, guess what pal, that's what life IS, a series of setbacks out of your control.
If you're not funky enough to be a Globetrotter, deal with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282409</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hell, I'll bet there's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an <b>uncountable</b> number of planets so there's an <b>uncountable</b> number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed.<br>
&nbsp;</p> </div><p>I do not think that word means what you think it means...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , I 'll bet there 's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an uncountable number of planets so there 's an uncountable number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed .
  I do not think that word means what you think it means.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, I'll bet there's some pulp sci-fi series in nickel paperback form long ago that used the idea that the universe has an uncountable number of planets so there's an uncountable number of plot lines to keep my readers entertained and me employed.
  I do not think that word means what you think it means...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282417</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1244659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the show isn't coming back to Fox. Comedy Central ordered the episodes. 20th Television, although owned by News Corp, is a separate entity from the Fox broadcast network, and they also produce content for NBC, ABC, and CBS, among others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the show is n't coming back to Fox .
Comedy Central ordered the episodes .
20th Television , although owned by News Corp , is a separate entity from the Fox broadcast network , and they also produce content for NBC , ABC , and CBS , among others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the show isn't coming back to Fox.
Comedy Central ordered the episodes.
20th Television, although owned by News Corp, is a separate entity from the Fox broadcast network, and they also produce content for NBC, ABC, and CBS, among others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280789</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1244653620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By the way, am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of "Dollhouse"?  In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku's entire season.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By the way , am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of " Dollhouse " ?
In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku 's entire season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the way, am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of "Dollhouse"?
In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku's entire season.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281215</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>uberjack</author>
	<datestamp>1244655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to reference another show altogether, but BEST. NEWS. EVER.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to reference another show altogether , but BEST .
NEWS. EVER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to reference another show altogether, but BEST.
NEWS. EVER.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28289167</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1244653800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or they could resolve that plot in about 5 seconds and return to earth. It's not that big a deal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or they could resolve that plot in about 5 seconds and return to earth .
It 's not that big a deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or they could resolve that plot in about 5 seconds and return to earth.
It's not that big a deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281291</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome...</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1244655540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?</p></div><p>It's easier in this case, because they just have to reanimate the head and put it in a jar.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows ? It 's easier in this case , because they just have to reanimate the head and put it in a jar.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it take Comedy Central to re-animate the corpses of great shows?It's easier in this case, because they just have to reanimate the head and put it in a jar.- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282501</id>
	<title>Great news everyone!</title>
	<author>yoshi\_mon</author>
	<datestamp>1244660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the things that was cool about Futurama was it broke the Simpsons 'family animated sitcom' mold.  Giving it a different feel and of course many different options for the writers.</p><p>Since there is always the comparison to Family Guy keep in mind that Family Guy was just another family animated sitcom.  In fact many people have gone far out of their way to point this out as if other non-animated sitcoms have not been doing the same thing for many years.  We just had virtually no other points of reference when looking at prime time animation.</p><p>As an example look at American Dad.  It's a family animated sitcom but it changes up the:  dad is fat and does wacky stuff all the time, mom is very well intentioned and ignores all the flaws of her dysfunctional family, kids do stuff, blah blah.  Instead, due to some...suggestions...from Fox they made the dad a wacky wing-nut, the mother a blond ditz wing-nut enabler, and the kids who do stuff with the added fact that like the Simpsons the girl is the token left wing voice.  (And I don't want to get into the politics of American Dad but there is plenty more to be said about it's dynamic but that is beyond the scope of what I'm trying to say here.  Suffice to say I find it hilarious how they have left politics alone in S4.)</p><p>The uniqueness of Futurama's sitcom environment made it very open and different than the other 3 prime time family centered ones.  We can all only hope that the writers working on it's return will embrace that as well as the original ones did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the things that was cool about Futurama was it broke the Simpsons 'family animated sitcom ' mold .
Giving it a different feel and of course many different options for the writers.Since there is always the comparison to Family Guy keep in mind that Family Guy was just another family animated sitcom .
In fact many people have gone far out of their way to point this out as if other non-animated sitcoms have not been doing the same thing for many years .
We just had virtually no other points of reference when looking at prime time animation.As an example look at American Dad .
It 's a family animated sitcom but it changes up the : dad is fat and does wacky stuff all the time , mom is very well intentioned and ignores all the flaws of her dysfunctional family , kids do stuff , blah blah .
Instead , due to some...suggestions...from Fox they made the dad a wacky wing-nut , the mother a blond ditz wing-nut enabler , and the kids who do stuff with the added fact that like the Simpsons the girl is the token left wing voice .
( And I do n't want to get into the politics of American Dad but there is plenty more to be said about it 's dynamic but that is beyond the scope of what I 'm trying to say here .
Suffice to say I find it hilarious how they have left politics alone in S4 .
) The uniqueness of Futurama 's sitcom environment made it very open and different than the other 3 prime time family centered ones .
We can all only hope that the writers working on it 's return will embrace that as well as the original ones did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the things that was cool about Futurama was it broke the Simpsons 'family animated sitcom' mold.
Giving it a different feel and of course many different options for the writers.Since there is always the comparison to Family Guy keep in mind that Family Guy was just another family animated sitcom.
In fact many people have gone far out of their way to point this out as if other non-animated sitcoms have not been doing the same thing for many years.
We just had virtually no other points of reference when looking at prime time animation.As an example look at American Dad.
It's a family animated sitcom but it changes up the:  dad is fat and does wacky stuff all the time, mom is very well intentioned and ignores all the flaws of her dysfunctional family, kids do stuff, blah blah.
Instead, due to some...suggestions...from Fox they made the dad a wacky wing-nut, the mother a blond ditz wing-nut enabler, and the kids who do stuff with the added fact that like the Simpsons the girl is the token left wing voice.
(And I don't want to get into the politics of American Dad but there is plenty more to be said about it's dynamic but that is beyond the scope of what I'm trying to say here.
Suffice to say I find it hilarious how they have left politics alone in S4.
)The uniqueness of Futurama's sitcom environment made it very open and different than the other 3 prime time family centered ones.
We can all only hope that the writers working on it's return will embrace that as well as the original ones did.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281767</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1244657340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The shuffling schedule was bad enough.  When that didn't kill Futurama, though, they put it on right after football.  So anytime the football game ran long, they'd cancel the Futurama airing.  It got to be that you didn't know when it would be on because you could never predict when the football game would end.  They aired so few episodes one season that they were able to use the unaired episodes as a completely separate season.  Then, with production shut down for a year, they claimed it would cost too much to start back up and make new episodes and besides the ratings were horrible anyway.  (Duh.  If people don't know *if* an episode is going to air, chances are they won't stick around to see if it actually does air!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The shuffling schedule was bad enough .
When that did n't kill Futurama , though , they put it on right after football .
So anytime the football game ran long , they 'd cancel the Futurama airing .
It got to be that you did n't know when it would be on because you could never predict when the football game would end .
They aired so few episodes one season that they were able to use the unaired episodes as a completely separate season .
Then , with production shut down for a year , they claimed it would cost too much to start back up and make new episodes and besides the ratings were horrible anyway .
( Duh. If people do n't know * if * an episode is going to air , chances are they wo n't stick around to see if it actually does air !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The shuffling schedule was bad enough.
When that didn't kill Futurama, though, they put it on right after football.
So anytime the football game ran long, they'd cancel the Futurama airing.
It got to be that you didn't know when it would be on because you could never predict when the football game would end.
They aired so few episodes one season that they were able to use the unaired episodes as a completely separate season.
Then, with production shut down for a year, they claimed it would cost too much to start back up and make new episodes and besides the ratings were horrible anyway.
(Duh.  If people don't know *if* an episode is going to air, chances are they won't stick around to see if it actually does air!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280881</id>
	<title>Re:Huh wha...?</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1244653920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you give executives a raise Obama's gonna be PISSED!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you give executives a raise Obama 's gon na be PISSED !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you give executives a raise Obama's gonna be PISSED!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244654220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blue Harvest was shit, actually.</p><p>Family Guy's references are so fucking dialed-in that they actually offend me.<br>They copy scenes from movies so often, with nothing added, and for no reason other than to fill time that I don't see how anyone could consider them a reference, tribute, or homage.  It's fucking plagiarism.</p><p>They drag out "jokes" so long and so often that "dragging out a joke way too long" has BECOME their new joke, and they've dragged THAT joke out way too long.</p><p>And internet memes?  Really?</p><p>And taking pot shots at the Simpsons?  Stealing Chuck Mangione and Feels So Good from King of the Hill (AND not referring to Chuck Mangione by name at all, AND calling the instrument a trumpet when it's NOT a fucking trumpet!)?</p><p>Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.  We'll have three shows by him soon.</p><p>Here's how it goes.</p><p>SCENE:  <i>Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.</i></p><p>Writer 1: "Hey you remember &lt;thing from the 80s&gt;?  That was so cool!"</p><p>Writer 2: "Yeah, lol!"</p><p>Writer 3: "What?  I don't remember that."</p><p>Writer 1: "You don't know &lt;thing&gt;?  OMG it was the best!  It had &lt;thing&gt; and &lt;thing&gt;!"</p><p>Writer 2: "Here look I found it on the internet!"</p><p>Writer 3: "Oh yeah, I vaguely remember this.  But it didn't have &lt;thing&gt; and it was actually just a &lt;thing&gt;."</p><p>Writer 2 (reading Wikipedia): "Oh yeah, I guess you 're right.  BUT OMG WE SHOULD SO USE THIS FOR THE SHOW!"</p><p>Writer 1: "YEAH!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue Harvest was shit , actually.Family Guy 's references are so fucking dialed-in that they actually offend me.They copy scenes from movies so often , with nothing added , and for no reason other than to fill time that I do n't see how anyone could consider them a reference , tribute , or homage .
It 's fucking plagiarism.They drag out " jokes " so long and so often that " dragging out a joke way too long " has BECOME their new joke , and they 've dragged THAT joke out way too long.And internet memes ?
Really ? And taking pot shots at the Simpsons ?
Stealing Chuck Mangione and Feels So Good from King of the Hill ( AND not referring to Chuck Mangione by name at all , AND calling the instrument a trumpet when it 's NOT a fucking trumpet !
) ? Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice .
We 'll have three shows by him soon.Here 's how it goes.SCENE : Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.Writer 1 : " Hey you remember ?
That was so cool !
" Writer 2 : " Yeah , lol !
" Writer 3 : " What ?
I do n't remember that .
" Writer 1 : " You do n't know ?
OMG it was the best !
It had and !
" Writer 2 : " Here look I found it on the internet !
" Writer 3 : " Oh yeah , I vaguely remember this .
But it did n't have and it was actually just a .
" Writer 2 ( reading Wikipedia ) : " Oh yeah , I guess you 're right .
BUT OMG WE SHOULD SO USE THIS FOR THE SHOW !
" Writer 1 : " YEAH ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue Harvest was shit, actually.Family Guy's references are so fucking dialed-in that they actually offend me.They copy scenes from movies so often, with nothing added, and for no reason other than to fill time that I don't see how anyone could consider them a reference, tribute, or homage.
It's fucking plagiarism.They drag out "jokes" so long and so often that "dragging out a joke way too long" has BECOME their new joke, and they've dragged THAT joke out way too long.And internet memes?
Really?And taking pot shots at the Simpsons?
Stealing Chuck Mangione and Feels So Good from King of the Hill (AND not referring to Chuck Mangione by name at all, AND calling the instrument a trumpet when it's NOT a fucking trumpet!
)?Seth McFarlane is a fucking hack who talks just to hear the sound of his own voice.
We'll have three shows by him soon.Here's how it goes.SCENE:  Writers sitting around a table talking about the 80s.Writer 1: "Hey you remember ?
That was so cool!
"Writer 2: "Yeah, lol!
"Writer 3: "What?
I don't remember that.
"Writer 1: "You don't know ?
OMG it was the best!
It had  and !
"Writer 2: "Here look I found it on the internet!
"Writer 3: "Oh yeah, I vaguely remember this.
But it didn't have  and it was actually just a .
"Writer 2 (reading Wikipedia): "Oh yeah, I guess you 're right.
BUT OMG WE SHOULD SO USE THIS FOR THE SHOW!
"Writer 1: "YEAH!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282613</id>
	<title>Re:reboot</title>
	<author>lucifig</author>
	<datestamp>1244660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Budweiser Classic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Budweiser Classic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Budweiser Classic!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244649180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world. New Futurama is always welcome.</p></div><p>The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/SPOILER, with just the ship and crew.<br>They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , if they can just treat the movies as non-canon , all will be right with the world .
New Futurama is always welcome.The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe /SPOILER , with just the ship and crew.They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, if they can just treat the movies as non-canon, all will be right with the world.
New Futurama is always welcome.The end of Green Yonder has them SPOILER move into another universe /SPOILER, with just the ship and crew.They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290997</id>
	<title>Re:Hot Diggity Daffodil!</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1244719140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.</p></div><p>Uh, do you remember the episode where earth was invaded - probably the lawyer show - and it ended with the city shot to all hell and Fry commented how the trick to TV shows was that "at the end of the day, everything is back to normal". Great meta-joke, where they obviously next episode it was if it never happened.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.Uh , do you remember the episode where earth was invaded - probably the lawyer show - and it ended with the city shot to all hell and Fry commented how the trick to TV shows was that " at the end of the day , everything is back to normal " .
Great meta-joke , where they obviously next episode it was if it never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can therefore ignore pretty much everything done before.Uh, do you remember the episode where earth was invaded - probably the lawyer show - and it ended with the city shot to all hell and Fry commented how the trick to TV shows was that "at the end of the day, everything is back to normal".
Great meta-joke, where they obviously next episode it was if it never happened.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281655</id>
	<title>Re:It's too late</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1244656920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation?</p></div></blockquote><p>What they oughta do is find a good actress with two eyes, then poke one out.  That'd be a timesaver.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation ? What they oughta do is find a good actress with two eyes , then poke one out .
That 'd be a timesaver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where do they expect to find another actress with the eye mutation?What they oughta do is find a good actress with two eyes, then poke one out.
That'd be a timesaver.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282929</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1244662080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>By the way, am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of "Dollhouse"?  In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku's entire season.</p></div><p>You watch Dollhouse for the acting?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>By the way , am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of " Dollhouse " ?
In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku 's entire season.You watch Dollhouse for the acting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the way, am I the only person who thinks that Alan Tudyk deserves to be the real star of "Dollhouse"?
In two episodes he out-acted Eliza Dushku's entire season.You watch Dollhouse for the acting?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282351</id>
	<title>Great now just re-animate</title>
	<author>JimboFBX</author>
	<datestamp>1244659620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mystery Science Theater 3000<br> <br>

Except do it in the form of ICWXP (www.icwxp.com). I can't say I've been happy with the quality of rifftrax lately and I doubt the old writing team and rifftrax are going to join forces... At least ICWXP has their act together.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mystery Science Theater 3000 Except do it in the form of ICWXP ( www.icwxp.com ) .
I ca n't say I 've been happy with the quality of rifftrax lately and I doubt the old writing team and rifftrax are going to join forces... At least ICWXP has their act together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mystery Science Theater 3000 

Except do it in the form of ICWXP (www.icwxp.com).
I can't say I've been happy with the quality of rifftrax lately and I doubt the old writing team and rifftrax are going to join forces... At least ICWXP has their act together.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859</id>
	<title>Re:Can Futurama unjump the shark?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244649540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Series four gave us The Farnsworth Parabox, The Sting, 300 Big Boys and The Devils Hands are Idle Playthings, all of which were awesome.</p><p>Also, more importantly, which writers dropped off the show in seasons three and four that you think were funny and sharp?  Given the writers credits in Wikipedia suggest that almost all contributors in the first two seasons wrote episodes in three and four I'm not really sure who you're referring to:</p><p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_futurama\_episodes" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">List of Futurama episodes with writers</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Series four gave us The Farnsworth Parabox , The Sting , 300 Big Boys and The Devils Hands are Idle Playthings , all of which were awesome.Also , more importantly , which writers dropped off the show in seasons three and four that you think were funny and sharp ?
Given the writers credits in Wikipedia suggest that almost all contributors in the first two seasons wrote episodes in three and four I 'm not really sure who you 're referring to : List of Futurama episodes with writers [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Series four gave us The Farnsworth Parabox, The Sting, 300 Big Boys and The Devils Hands are Idle Playthings, all of which were awesome.Also, more importantly, which writers dropped off the show in seasons three and four that you think were funny and sharp?
Given the writers credits in Wikipedia suggest that almost all contributors in the first two seasons wrote episodes in three and four I'm not really sure who you're referring to:
List of Futurama episodes with writers [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281421</id>
	<title>Re:reboot</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1244656020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast, and more action (and sex) to excite a younger more modern audience. The Planet Express spaceship's bridge will look like the Apple Store, Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender. It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam. And there will be lots of lens flare...</p></div><p>You forgot the blackjack and hookers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast , and more action ( and sex ) to excite a younger more modern audience .
The Planet Express spaceship 's bridge will look like the Apple Store , Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender .
It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam .
And there will be lots of lens flare...You forgot the blackjack and hookers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast, and more action (and sex) to excite a younger more modern audience.
The Planet Express spaceship's bridge will look like the Apple Store, Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender.
It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam.
And there will be lots of lens flare...You forgot the blackjack and hookers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</id>
	<title>Sounds like Fox has finally got its act together.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244647560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lessons learned:</p><ol><li>1. Ratings are not the end-all be-all.</li><li>2. DVD sales matter.</li></ol><p>Thinking like this is what saved <i>Dollhouse.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lessons learned : 1 .
Ratings are not the end-all be-all.2 .
DVD sales matter.Thinking like this is what saved Dollhouse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lessons learned:1.
Ratings are not the end-all be-all.2.
DVD sales matter.Thinking like this is what saved Dollhouse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281913</id>
	<title>Re:No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244657880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going to commit suicide, try for a two-fer with the quarter tied to your finger.  You'll also want slow and painful, and probably want to upgrade to gouge out your eyes too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to commit suicide , try for a two-fer with the quarter tied to your finger .
You 'll also want slow and painful , and probably want to upgrade to gouge out your eyes too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to commit suicide, try for a two-fer with the quarter tied to your finger.
You'll also want slow and painful, and probably want to upgrade to gouge out your eyes too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1244648640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Family Guy" is the Denzel Washington of animated series. At one point, it was fresh and original.</p><p>But then it became huge. Now everyone loves it because it's "Family Guy." Stewie's gonna say something gay, there's gonna be thirty "like that time I was..." jokes that are sorta mildly amusing. Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh (Blue Harvest), but then it's back into the routine. Or the 'new' just gets recycled into the routine (like the Shawshank parody.)</p><p>Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor. He's played "Morally right guy that the establishment doesn't like / believe / trust" in like twenty movies now. Every once in a while he steps out and it's fantastic (Training Day), but then he turns around and makes "Man on Fire" three more times for the paychecks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Family Guy " is the Denzel Washington of animated series .
At one point , it was fresh and original.But then it became huge .
Now everyone loves it because it 's " Family Guy .
" Stewie 's gon na say something gay , there 's gon na be thirty " like that time I was... " jokes that are sorta mildly amusing .
Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh ( Blue Harvest ) , but then it 's back into the routine .
Or the 'new ' just gets recycled into the routine ( like the Shawshank parody .
) Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor .
He 's played " Morally right guy that the establishment does n't like / believe / trust " in like twenty movies now .
Every once in a while he steps out and it 's fantastic ( Training Day ) , but then he turns around and makes " Man on Fire " three more times for the paychecks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Family Guy" is the Denzel Washington of animated series.
At one point, it was fresh and original.But then it became huge.
Now everyone loves it because it's "Family Guy.
" Stewie's gonna say something gay, there's gonna be thirty "like that time I was..." jokes that are sorta mildly amusing.
Every once it a while it steps out and does something fresh (Blue Harvest), but then it's back into the routine.
Or the 'new' just gets recycled into the routine (like the Shawshank parody.
)Denzel Washington does the same thing as an actor.
He's played "Morally right guy that the establishment doesn't like / believe / trust" in like twenty movies now.
Every once in a while he steps out and it's fantastic (Training Day), but then he turns around and makes "Man on Fire" three more times for the paychecks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281213</id>
	<title>Has to be done...</title>
	<author>scratchpaper</author>
	<datestamp>1244655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good News Everyone!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good News Everyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good News Everyone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282187</id>
	<title>Re:reboot</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1244658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, as long as there's lens flare I guess it'll be alright</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , as long as there 's lens flare I guess it 'll be alright</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, as long as there's lens flare I guess it'll be alright</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283667</id>
	<title>This is news?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1244665200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this is news worthy because.....?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this is news worthy because..... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this is news worthy because.....?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283141</id>
	<title>I have always wondered...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244662920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the chick with one eye have an extra hole to make up for it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the chick with one eye have an extra hole to make up for it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the chick with one eye have an extra hole to make up for it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403</id>
	<title>No more suicide for me.</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1244652180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Over the past 15 years I've watched as my life become harder to live due to a series of set backs that are out of my control. I sat down and reasoned out suicide as being the best solution to my permanent problems.

Now that Futurama is coming back on TV I figured that I should just sit around until it goes off the air again. I hope it's as good as it used to be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Over the past 15 years I 've watched as my life become harder to live due to a series of set backs that are out of my control .
I sat down and reasoned out suicide as being the best solution to my permanent problems .
Now that Futurama is coming back on TV I figured that I should just sit around until it goes off the air again .
I hope it 's as good as it used to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over the past 15 years I've watched as my life become harder to live due to a series of set backs that are out of my control.
I sat down and reasoned out suicide as being the best solution to my permanent problems.
Now that Futurama is coming back on TV I figured that I should just sit around until it goes off the air again.
I hope it's as good as it used to be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280899</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like Fox has finally got its act togethe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244653980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ratings may not be the end-all-be-all, but the viewing audience still IS the end-all-be-all of tv shows.  People are still not going to sit their butts on the sofa and sit through this show during the CC airing.  Unless they decide to scrap prime time showings and go direct to DVD this is doomed to fail yet again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ratings may not be the end-all-be-all , but the viewing audience still IS the end-all-be-all of tv shows .
People are still not going to sit their butts on the sofa and sit through this show during the CC airing .
Unless they decide to scrap prime time showings and go direct to DVD this is doomed to fail yet again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ratings may not be the end-all-be-all, but the viewing audience still IS the end-all-be-all of tv shows.
People are still not going to sit their butts on the sofa and sit through this show during the CC airing.
Unless they decide to scrap prime time showings and go direct to DVD this is doomed to fail yet again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281715</id>
	<title>Re:More Than Deserves a Second Chance</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1244657160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not just recent episodes of The Simpsons in which they have left Springfield. Simpsons travel episodes happen so many times it would be difficult to count them all.</p><p>Heres a list of places off the top of my head, and I'm starting a 1 minute timer while create it:</p><p>England, China, Japan, Toronto, Mexico, Shelbyville, Vegas, New York City, The Super Bowl, India, Australia, Washington DC, Machu Pichu, a safari, Brazil, Italy, Alaska, France, Branson, Capitol City, Cuba, Hollywood, Florida, New Orleans, the South Pacific Islands.</p><p>I'm sure this list doubles if I take the time to think about it.</p><p>The comparative for Futurama, however, is that they travel through time, not space, as space travel is rendered obsolete (it isnt a point of interest to see different parts of the world in the year 3001, or whatever year its supposed to be now, due to the melting pot of multiple universes, we no longer care about what country or even planet the show is located).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not just recent episodes of The Simpsons in which they have left Springfield .
Simpsons travel episodes happen so many times it would be difficult to count them all.Heres a list of places off the top of my head , and I 'm starting a 1 minute timer while create it : England , China , Japan , Toronto , Mexico , Shelbyville , Vegas , New York City , The Super Bowl , India , Australia , Washington DC , Machu Pichu , a safari , Brazil , Italy , Alaska , France , Branson , Capitol City , Cuba , Hollywood , Florida , New Orleans , the South Pacific Islands.I 'm sure this list doubles if I take the time to think about it.The comparative for Futurama , however , is that they travel through time , not space , as space travel is rendered obsolete ( it isnt a point of interest to see different parts of the world in the year 3001 , or whatever year its supposed to be now , due to the melting pot of multiple universes , we no longer care about what country or even planet the show is located ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not just recent episodes of The Simpsons in which they have left Springfield.
Simpsons travel episodes happen so many times it would be difficult to count them all.Heres a list of places off the top of my head, and I'm starting a 1 minute timer while create it:England, China, Japan, Toronto, Mexico, Shelbyville, Vegas, New York City, The Super Bowl, India, Australia, Washington DC, Machu Pichu, a safari, Brazil, Italy, Alaska, France, Branson, Capitol City, Cuba, Hollywood, Florida, New Orleans, the South Pacific Islands.I'm sure this list doubles if I take the time to think about it.The comparative for Futurama, however, is that they travel through time, not space, as space travel is rendered obsolete (it isnt a point of interest to see different parts of the world in the year 3001, or whatever year its supposed to be now, due to the melting pot of multiple universes, we no longer care about what country or even planet the show is located).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280731</id>
	<title>Re:Let it die.</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1244653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bender's Game wasn't about environmentalism, it just used non-renewable fuels as a plot device.  Into the Wild Green Yonder, on the other hand, was definitely anvilicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bender 's Game was n't about environmentalism , it just used non-renewable fuels as a plot device .
Into the Wild Green Yonder , on the other hand , was definitely anvilicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bender's Game wasn't about environmentalism, it just used non-renewable fuels as a plot device.
Into the Wild Green Yonder, on the other hand, was definitely anvilicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761</id>
	<title>reboot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244649000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast, and more action (and sex) to excite a younger more modern audience. The Planet Express spaceship's bridge will look like the Apple Store, Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender.  It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam. And there will be lots of lens flare...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast , and more action ( and sex ) to excite a younger more modern audience .
The Planet Express spaceship 's bridge will look like the Apple Store , Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender .
It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam .
And there will be lots of lens flare.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be a reboot of Futurama with a new cast, and more action (and sex) to excite a younger more modern audience.
The Planet Express spaceship's bridge will look like the Apple Store, Leela will be having a secret affair with Bender.
It will be shot in realistic shakey-cam.
And there will be lots of lens flare...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28292939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28286957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28289167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_10_1331258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279653
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280269
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280961
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288587
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282077
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28288117
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280721
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280681
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280047
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281647
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280209
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280581
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280079
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28286025
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279387
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279801
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28289167
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280725
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279859
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282111
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281127
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280789
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28286957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279669
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28292939
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28290765
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282301
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280477
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282897
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282811
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282093
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28279359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28282571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_10_1331258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28280403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28283281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_10_1331258.28281913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
