<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_09_017249</id>
	<title>Futurama Rumored To Return On Comedy Central</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244539560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>avajcovec points out a brief note on Collider.com that Comedy Central has ordered <a href="http://www.collider.com/2009/06/07/exclusive-comedy-central-goes-back-to-the-futurama/">13 new episodes of Futurama</a>. Quoting: <i>"Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward. This should be a welcome surprise to fans of the show who have already gone through the series' cancellation and resurrection as direct-to-DVD movies."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>avajcovec points out a brief note on Collider.com that Comedy Central has ordered 13 new episodes of Futurama .
Quoting : " Though still technically a rumor at this point , word is that 'Futurama ' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward .
This should be a welcome surprise to fans of the show who have already gone through the series ' cancellation and resurrection as direct-to-DVD movies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>avajcovec points out a brief note on Collider.com that Comedy Central has ordered 13 new episodes of Futurama.
Quoting: "Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.
This should be a welcome surprise to fans of the show who have already gone through the series' cancellation and resurrection as direct-to-DVD movies.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268551</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1244573160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).</p></div><p>So, to follow Family Guy... Mila Kunis as Leela, then?</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic , either ( to paraphrase Family Guy ) .So , to follow Family Guy... Mila Kunis as Leela , then ? - RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).So, to follow Family Guy... Mila Kunis as Leela, then?- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28273693</id>
	<title>Summary and TFA get it (partly) wrong</title>
	<author>LionMage</author>
	<datestamp>1244555160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fortunately, there's an update at the same site with <a href="http://www.collider.com/2009/06/09/futurama-picked-up-for-26-episodes/" title="collider.com">the real dope</a> [collider.com]: It's 26 episodes, not 13!  So, we get a full season.  I know my fiancee and I are going to celebrate...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , there 's an update at the same site with the real dope [ collider.com ] : It 's 26 episodes , not 13 !
So , we get a full season .
I know my fiancee and I are going to celebrate.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, there's an update at the same site with the real dope [collider.com]: It's 26 episodes, not 13!
So, we get a full season.
I know my fiancee and I are going to celebrate...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271461</id>
	<title>can wait</title>
	<author>OrangeMonkey11</author>
	<datestamp>1244541300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>got my stocks of Clagnars Human Rinds ready to go

It's a buncha, muncha, cruncha human</htmltext>
<tokenext>got my stocks of Clagnars Human Rinds ready to go It 's a buncha , muncha , cruncha human</tokentext>
<sentencetext>got my stocks of Clagnars Human Rinds ready to go

It's a buncha, muncha, cruncha human</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263779</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>thhamm</author>
	<datestamp>1244552040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>All glory to the hypnotoad!</i> <br> <br>
This show is going downhill since season 3!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All glory to the hypnotoad !
This show is going downhill since season 3 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All glory to the hypnotoad!
This show is going downhill since season 3!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</id>
	<title>Casting</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1244543940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.</p></div><p>Let's hope it's all the original cast. Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though still technically a rumor at this point , word is that 'Futurama ' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.Let 's hope it 's all the original cast .
Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic , either ( to paraphrase Family Guy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.Let's hope it's all the original cast.
Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265531</id>
	<title>Ahead of Time</title>
	<author>evan\_arrrr!</author>
	<datestamp>1244561760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's just hope that Futurama remains ahead of it's time. When the show originally aired back in 1999, it was far ahead of the pack as far as comedy goes, and it still remains my favorite show of all time. I dare say, it's even better than the Simpsons (and I have friends who back me up on this point).

Anyway, it's been six years since we've gotten any new material (other than the movies, which I haven't seen). Does anyone really think the writers will be able to top what was once so profound (yes, I am calling Futurama profound)? The social commentary was biting and harsh, but still hilarious. Does anyone really think they can bring back the same feeling?

I guess I'm just hoping the show doesn't just devolve into another Family Guy. I'm also afraid that my favorite show will be ruined by these new episodes, if they do indeed start the show up again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just hope that Futurama remains ahead of it 's time .
When the show originally aired back in 1999 , it was far ahead of the pack as far as comedy goes , and it still remains my favorite show of all time .
I dare say , it 's even better than the Simpsons ( and I have friends who back me up on this point ) .
Anyway , it 's been six years since we 've gotten any new material ( other than the movies , which I have n't seen ) .
Does anyone really think the writers will be able to top what was once so profound ( yes , I am calling Futurama profound ) ?
The social commentary was biting and harsh , but still hilarious .
Does anyone really think they can bring back the same feeling ?
I guess I 'm just hoping the show does n't just devolve into another Family Guy .
I 'm also afraid that my favorite show will be ruined by these new episodes , if they do indeed start the show up again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just hope that Futurama remains ahead of it's time.
When the show originally aired back in 1999, it was far ahead of the pack as far as comedy goes, and it still remains my favorite show of all time.
I dare say, it's even better than the Simpsons (and I have friends who back me up on this point).
Anyway, it's been six years since we've gotten any new material (other than the movies, which I haven't seen).
Does anyone really think the writers will be able to top what was once so profound (yes, I am calling Futurama profound)?
The social commentary was biting and harsh, but still hilarious.
Does anyone really think they can bring back the same feeling?
I guess I'm just hoping the show doesn't just devolve into another Family Guy.
I'm also afraid that my favorite show will be ruined by these new episodes, if they do indeed start the show up again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264937</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>boeroboy</author>
	<datestamp>1244559060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Careful!  Remember John Goodman voiced the original Santa in their first Christmas special.  He wasn't available so John di Maggio did it.  It was seamless.  You almost couldn't tell until the DVD commentary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Careful !
Remember John Goodman voiced the original Santa in their first Christmas special .
He was n't available so John di Maggio did it .
It was seamless .
You almost could n't tell until the DVD commentary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Careful!
Remember John Goodman voiced the original Santa in their first Christmas special.
He wasn't available so John di Maggio did it.
It was seamless.
You almost couldn't tell until the DVD commentary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265569</id>
	<title>Re:The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1244562000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only were they missing a bunch of their better writers, but they were trying to do feature length movies, which Futurama just isn't well-suited for. It was almost as bad as the Aqua Teen Hungerforce movie (great in 15 minutes chunks, torture for a full 90 minutes).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only were they missing a bunch of their better writers , but they were trying to do feature length movies , which Futurama just is n't well-suited for .
It was almost as bad as the Aqua Teen Hungerforce movie ( great in 15 minutes chunks , torture for a full 90 minutes ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only were they missing a bunch of their better writers, but they were trying to do feature length movies, which Futurama just isn't well-suited for.
It was almost as bad as the Aqua Teen Hungerforce movie (great in 15 minutes chunks, torture for a full 90 minutes).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267077</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Capt.DrumkenBum</author>
	<datestamp>1244567580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Suddenly my sig in on topic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suddenly my sig in on topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suddenly my sig in on topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264689</id>
	<title>All hail The Merciful Lord Obama!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244558100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who else could get a pass from the world press when one day he's telling Muslims that the war in Iraq was illegal (despite Saddam's continual provocation and flaunting of UN resolutions), and the next day he's telling US soldiers in Iraq what a great job they're doing?  I ask you, would George Bush have been allowed to get away with spinning continuing job losses positively by using an unmeasurable metric like "jobs saved or created?"  Attention Associated Propaganda machine: "fun-employment," as you've so cutely named being laid off from your job, is only an option for single yuppies or grown-ups who never grew up and are still mooching off their parents.  The world press has about as much credibility in matters regarding Obama as Pravda during the Cold War.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who else could get a pass from the world press when one day he 's telling Muslims that the war in Iraq was illegal ( despite Saddam 's continual provocation and flaunting of UN resolutions ) , and the next day he 's telling US soldiers in Iraq what a great job they 're doing ?
I ask you , would George Bush have been allowed to get away with spinning continuing job losses positively by using an unmeasurable metric like " jobs saved or created ?
" Attention Associated Propaganda machine : " fun-employment , " as you 've so cutely named being laid off from your job , is only an option for single yuppies or grown-ups who never grew up and are still mooching off their parents .
The world press has about as much credibility in matters regarding Obama as Pravda during the Cold War .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who else could get a pass from the world press when one day he's telling Muslims that the war in Iraq was illegal (despite Saddam's continual provocation and flaunting of UN resolutions), and the next day he's telling US soldiers in Iraq what a great job they're doing?
I ask you, would George Bush have been allowed to get away with spinning continuing job losses positively by using an unmeasurable metric like "jobs saved or created?
"  Attention Associated Propaganda machine: "fun-employment," as you've so cutely named being laid off from your job, is only an option for single yuppies or grown-ups who never grew up and are still mooching off their parents.
The world press has about as much credibility in matters regarding Obama as Pravda during the Cold War.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28272965</id>
	<title>Lets stop bashing Bender's Big Score.</title>
	<author>Chris Tucker</author>
	<datestamp>1244549700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was done to stop the hate mail from everyone who saw "Jurassic Bark".</p><p>It is obvious to the most casual of observers that BBS is a retcon of the climax of "Jurassic Bark".</p><p>All that other stuff was just there to pad it out and little bit.</p><p>After all, they couldn't really call it, "OK! Enough Already With The Hate Mail! Look, see, we're fixing it. Seymour had a long happy life with Fry."</p><p>If for no other reason than that long title wouldn't fit on the box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was done to stop the hate mail from everyone who saw " Jurassic Bark " .It is obvious to the most casual of observers that BBS is a retcon of the climax of " Jurassic Bark " .All that other stuff was just there to pad it out and little bit.After all , they could n't really call it , " OK !
Enough Already With The Hate Mail !
Look , see , we 're fixing it .
Seymour had a long happy life with Fry .
" If for no other reason than that long title would n't fit on the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was done to stop the hate mail from everyone who saw "Jurassic Bark".It is obvious to the most casual of observers that BBS is a retcon of the climax of "Jurassic Bark".All that other stuff was just there to pad it out and little bit.After all, they couldn't really call it, "OK!
Enough Already With The Hate Mail!
Look, see, we're fixing it.
Seymour had a long happy life with Fry.
"If for no other reason than that long title wouldn't fit on the box.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263147</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1244544000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NEWS DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NEWS DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NEWS DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263205</id>
	<title>Who gives a fsck...</title>
	<author>tyroneking</author>
	<datestamp>1244544720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... can't we have something new instead? Endless goofy humour is cool for a while but isnt Groening over that now? We need and should expect more from him.</p><p>We recently had mention of Stanislaw Lem here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. so how about Groening does some animation based on his stories instead. A proper animated remake of Solaris maybe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Or hell, a p***-take of Solaris.</p><p>Maybe I don't understand why the short-lived  humour of Robot Chicken and Futurama are still dominating cartoons and then the wonderful and surreal days of Kricfalusi are long past us...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... ca n't we have something new instead ?
Endless goofy humour is cool for a while but isnt Groening over that now ?
We need and should expect more from him.We recently had mention of Stanislaw Lem here on / .
so how about Groening does some animation based on his stories instead .
A proper animated remake of Solaris maybe ... Or hell , a p * * * -take of Solaris.Maybe I do n't understand why the short-lived humour of Robot Chicken and Futurama are still dominating cartoons and then the wonderful and surreal days of Kricfalusi are long past us.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... can't we have something new instead?
Endless goofy humour is cool for a while but isnt Groening over that now?
We need and should expect more from him.We recently had mention of Stanislaw Lem here on /.
so how about Groening does some animation based on his stories instead.
A proper animated remake of Solaris maybe ... Or hell, a p***-take of Solaris.Maybe I don't understand why the short-lived  humour of Robot Chicken and Futurama are still dominating cartoons and then the wonderful and surreal days of Kricfalusi are long past us...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263353</id>
	<title>Slashdotted</title>
	<author>Brama</author>
	<datestamp>1244546940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's another link: http://tv.ign.com/articles/992/992321p1.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's another link : http : //tv.ign.com/articles/992/992321p1.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's another link: http://tv.ign.com/articles/992/992321p1.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265873</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>ca111a</author>
	<datestamp>1244563260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>one has to suffer to create a masterpiece</htmltext>
<tokenext>one has to suffer to create a masterpiece</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one has to suffer to create a masterpiece</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265653</id>
	<title>Re:"Have you ever tried just turning off the TV</title>
	<author>ConceptJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1244562420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MST3K was at least able to continue on the (so-called) Sci-Fi channel.  Of course, they cancelled MST3K* around 1999, but these days, all the principals of that classic show are doing what they do best in other formats:  Rifftrax, The Film Crew and especially Cinematic Titanic.</p><p>We get the riffs we love and they are no longer beholden to that evolutionary cul-de-sac known as network executives.</p><p>* Probably needed more room on the schedule for no-budget horror films.  Yes, the Sci-Fi channel has been involved in some great material (e.g., Dune, BSG) but mostly it is a dumping ground for stuff that was too bad even for the USA Network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MST3K was at least able to continue on the ( so-called ) Sci-Fi channel .
Of course , they cancelled MST3K * around 1999 , but these days , all the principals of that classic show are doing what they do best in other formats : Rifftrax , The Film Crew and especially Cinematic Titanic.We get the riffs we love and they are no longer beholden to that evolutionary cul-de-sac known as network executives .
* Probably needed more room on the schedule for no-budget horror films .
Yes , the Sci-Fi channel has been involved in some great material ( e.g. , Dune , BSG ) but mostly it is a dumping ground for stuff that was too bad even for the USA Network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MST3K was at least able to continue on the (so-called) Sci-Fi channel.
Of course, they cancelled MST3K* around 1999, but these days, all the principals of that classic show are doing what they do best in other formats:  Rifftrax, The Film Crew and especially Cinematic Titanic.We get the riffs we love and they are no longer beholden to that evolutionary cul-de-sac known as network executives.
* Probably needed more room on the schedule for no-budget horror films.
Yes, the Sci-Fi channel has been involved in some great material (e.g., Dune, BSG) but mostly it is a dumping ground for stuff that was too bad even for the USA Network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393</id>
	<title>For fuck sake...</title>
	<author>GeorgeStone22</author>
	<datestamp>1244547360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kill the simpsons already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kill the simpsons already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kill the simpsons already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263803</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>OtoFX</author>
	<datestamp>1244552220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wooohooo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wooohooo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wooohooo!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263199</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244544660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long did it take them to get a clue?</p><p>More than 6 years?</p><p>And it's still only a rumor that they now have a clue...   LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long did it take them to get a clue ? More than 6 years ? And it 's still only a rumor that they now have a clue... LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long did it take them to get a clue?More than 6 years?And it's still only a rumor that they now have a clue...   LOL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263877</id>
	<title>Re:"Have you ever tried just turning off the TV</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1244553000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how about hitting the programming team at Comedy Central?</p><p>They still deserve several dozen whacks to the back of the head for cancellation of MST3k to put on dreck like Craig Kilborn's version of The Daily Show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how about hitting the programming team at Comedy Central ? They still deserve several dozen whacks to the back of the head for cancellation of MST3k to put on dreck like Craig Kilborn 's version of The Daily Show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about hitting the programming team at Comedy Central?They still deserve several dozen whacks to the back of the head for cancellation of MST3k to put on dreck like Craig Kilborn's version of The Daily Show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263163</id>
	<title>Cut and Paste</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1244544360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a feeling that after a few days we will be able to cut and paste entire scripts from episodes from all the posts...  Just a weird feeling...</p><p>P.S - Casting?  Uhhhh, that's been done.  Long time ago.  If they change the voices, that would be a bit too much.  They did not change the voices for the movie, why the hell start now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a feeling that after a few days we will be able to cut and paste entire scripts from episodes from all the posts... Just a weird feeling...P.S - Casting ?
Uhhhh , that 's been done .
Long time ago .
If they change the voices , that would be a bit too much .
They did not change the voices for the movie , why the hell start now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a feeling that after a few days we will be able to cut and paste entire scripts from episodes from all the posts...  Just a weird feeling...P.S - Casting?
Uhhhh, that's been done.
Long time ago.
If they change the voices, that would be a bit too much.
They did not change the voices for the movie, why the hell start now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265835</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>CritterUXH</author>
	<datestamp>1244563080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ride the Walrus!!</p><p>This message brought to by Fishy Joes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ride the Walrus !
! This message brought to by Fishy Joes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ride the Walrus!
!This message brought to by Fishy Joes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271493</id>
	<title>Re:The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244541420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are exactly the person Comic book guy was created to make fun of.</p><p>Think on that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are exactly the person Comic book guy was created to make fun of.Think on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are exactly the person Comic book guy was created to make fun of.Think on that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28270435</id>
	<title>Why is this noteworthy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244580000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great job slashdot!  I came here specifically to absorb television advertisements.  Stay classy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great job slashdot !
I came here specifically to absorb television advertisements .
Stay classy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great job slashdot!
I came here specifically to absorb television advertisements.
Stay classy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271447</id>
	<title>Re:For fuck sake...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244541240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for secondary reply, but I am curious:<br>How old were you when you started watching and hold were you when you decided it wasn't any good to you anymore?</p><p>I wonder if people who started watching it in there teens, or earlier, stopped enjoying it in the twenties as opposed to people that started watching it when they were older.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for secondary reply , but I am curious : How old were you when you started watching and hold were you when you decided it was n't any good to you anymore ? I wonder if people who started watching it in there teens , or earlier , stopped enjoying it in the twenties as opposed to people that started watching it when they were older .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for secondary reply, but I am curious:How old were you when you started watching and hold were you when you decided it wasn't any good to you anymore?I wonder if people who started watching it in there teens, or earlier, stopped enjoying it in the twenties as opposed to people that started watching it when they were older.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28275133</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>onemorechip</author>
	<datestamp>1244568000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the <a href="http://r33b.net/" title="r33b.net">link</a> [r33b.net].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the link [ r33b.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the link [r33b.net].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269937</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>Citizen of Earth</author>
	<datestamp>1244578140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Balls thoroughly licked!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Balls thoroughly licked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Balls thoroughly licked!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263145</id>
	<title>mmmbbbrrrBbrbrrbrbrmmmbbbmmrr</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1244544000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All hail the hypnotoad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail the hypnotoad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail the hypnotoad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269515</id>
	<title>Let's hope they can keep the original quality</title>
	<author>noewun</author>
	<datestamp>1244576340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because the movies mostly sucked. And I say that as someone with a Bender action figure on his desk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the movies mostly sucked .
And I say that as someone with a Bender action figure on his desk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the movies mostly sucked.
And I say that as someone with a Bender action figure on his desk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264407</id>
	<title>Re:Into the Wild Green Yonder</title>
	<author>TheThiefMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1244556720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap I missed that one!</p><p>Hope it's better than "beast with a billion backs".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap I missed that one ! Hope it 's better than " beast with a billion backs " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap I missed that one!Hope it's better than "beast with a billion backs".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264219</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244555580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it was YOU who coveted my ice creme bar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it was YOU who coveted my ice creme bar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was YOU who coveted my ice creme bar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265931</id>
	<title>Quotes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244563440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The present may stink, but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday."<br>- Fry, Futurama</p><p>"Why am I sticky and naked? Did I miss something fun?"<br>- Fry, Futurama</p><p>"That's so plausible I can't believe it!"<br>- Leela, Futurama</p><p>"I saved the space-time continuum, and 40\% of your rectum."<br>- Nibbler, Futurama</p><p>More here:<br><a href="http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama" title="quoteaddict.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama</a> [quoteaddict.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The present may stink , but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday .
" - Fry , Futurama " Why am I sticky and naked ?
Did I miss something fun ?
" - Fry , Futurama " That 's so plausible I ca n't believe it !
" - Leela , Futurama " I saved the space-time continuum , and 40 \ % of your rectum .
" - Nibbler , FuturamaMore here : http : //www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php ? search = futurama [ quoteaddict.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The present may stink, but at least now we can look forward to a better yesterday.
"- Fry, Futurama"Why am I sticky and naked?
Did I miss something fun?
"- Fry, Futurama"That's so plausible I can't believe it!
"- Leela, Futurama"I saved the space-time continuum, and 40\% of your rectum.
"- Nibbler, FuturamaMore here:http://www.quoteaddict.com/quotes.php?search=futurama [quoteaddict.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263303</id>
	<title>TV series = movies redone...?</title>
	<author>ufoolme</author>
	<datestamp>1244546280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I understand it this was always part of the plan, the movies were to be remade into a full tv series for the comedy chan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it this was always part of the plan , the movies were to be remade into a full tv series for the comedy chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it this was always part of the plan, the movies were to be remade into a full tv series for the comedy chan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244544480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am looking forw<b>All glory to the hypnotoad!</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am looking forwAll glory to the hypnotoad !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am looking forwAll glory to the hypnotoad!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263653</id>
	<title>Re:The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1244550660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens.</i></p><p>I'll agree that Family Guy was a shadow of its former self, once it returned from cancellation.</p><p>It took some time, but the show *has* returned to something like it's former levels of comedy though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens.I 'll agree that Family Guy was a shadow of its former self , once it returned from cancellation.It took some time , but the show * has * returned to something like it 's former levels of comedy though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens.I'll agree that Family Guy was a shadow of its former self, once it returned from cancellation.It took some time, but the show *has* returned to something like it's former levels of comedy though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244543280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good news everyone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news everyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news everyone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264321</id>
	<title>This Article Brought To You By Lightspeed Briefs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244556180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lightspeed fits today's active lifestyle.</p><p>Whether you're on the job<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or trolling Slashdot while on the job.</p><p>Lightspeed briefs, style and comfort for the discriminating crotch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lightspeed fits today 's active lifestyle.Whether you 're on the job ... ... or trolling Slashdot while on the job.Lightspeed briefs , style and comfort for the discriminating crotch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lightspeed fits today's active lifestyle.Whether you're on the job ... ... or trolling Slashdot while on the job.Lightspeed briefs, style and comfort for the discriminating crotch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264891</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244558880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It depends entirely on who you're using. Real actors tend to be absolutely terrible at voice acting - they have exactly one voice, or at best a couple that sound a lot like their real voice. Good voice actors are usually capable of coming up with any number of original voices, none of which sound anything like their real voice, and are usually very good at mimicking other voices.</p><p>On Futurama's cast, Billy West and Maurice LaMarche are pretty good voice actors (have a peek at their Wikipedia pages - the number of different characters they've voiced is insane, and I'd never have identified most of them), and John DiMaggio seems to be pretty prolific as well (although I've either never heard or can't remember any of his other roles in anything). Certainly in Futurama, you wouldn't be able to notice how many roles these three voice, almost all of whom sound completely different. Same goes for the Simpsons - between them, Dan Castellaneta, Hank Azaria and Harry Shearer voice most of the characters, and you'd never be able to pick out who does what character.</p><p>That's why I always find in puzzling that developers of video games or animated films (particularly Dreamworks) tend to use TV or film actors to do voice-over work. They just aren't very good at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends entirely on who you 're using .
Real actors tend to be absolutely terrible at voice acting - they have exactly one voice , or at best a couple that sound a lot like their real voice .
Good voice actors are usually capable of coming up with any number of original voices , none of which sound anything like their real voice , and are usually very good at mimicking other voices.On Futurama 's cast , Billy West and Maurice LaMarche are pretty good voice actors ( have a peek at their Wikipedia pages - the number of different characters they 've voiced is insane , and I 'd never have identified most of them ) , and John DiMaggio seems to be pretty prolific as well ( although I 've either never heard or ca n't remember any of his other roles in anything ) .
Certainly in Futurama , you would n't be able to notice how many roles these three voice , almost all of whom sound completely different .
Same goes for the Simpsons - between them , Dan Castellaneta , Hank Azaria and Harry Shearer voice most of the characters , and you 'd never be able to pick out who does what character.That 's why I always find in puzzling that developers of video games or animated films ( particularly Dreamworks ) tend to use TV or film actors to do voice-over work .
They just are n't very good at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends entirely on who you're using.
Real actors tend to be absolutely terrible at voice acting - they have exactly one voice, or at best a couple that sound a lot like their real voice.
Good voice actors are usually capable of coming up with any number of original voices, none of which sound anything like their real voice, and are usually very good at mimicking other voices.On Futurama's cast, Billy West and Maurice LaMarche are pretty good voice actors (have a peek at their Wikipedia pages - the number of different characters they've voiced is insane, and I'd never have identified most of them), and John DiMaggio seems to be pretty prolific as well (although I've either never heard or can't remember any of his other roles in anything).
Certainly in Futurama, you wouldn't be able to notice how many roles these three voice, almost all of whom sound completely different.
Same goes for the Simpsons - between them, Dan Castellaneta, Hank Azaria and Harry Shearer voice most of the characters, and you'd never be able to pick out who does what character.That's why I always find in puzzling that developers of video games or animated films (particularly Dreamworks) tend to use TV or film actors to do voice-over work.
They just aren't very good at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266333</id>
	<title>FuturaWHO?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244565120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would much rather watch Space Pilot 3000.Now that was a show.Frozen pizza boy and a one eyed chick,some robot that bends metal.....</p><p>Anyone who likes this futurama thing can "bite my shiny metal ass."</p><p>As long as you don't make me smell Uranus. To prevent 'Your anus' jokes we renamed it. . . Urectum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would much rather watch Space Pilot 3000.Now that was a show.Frozen pizza boy and a one eyed chick,some robot that bends metal.....Anyone who likes this futurama thing can " bite my shiny metal ass .
" As long as you do n't make me smell Uranus .
To prevent 'Your anus ' jokes we renamed it .
. .
Urectum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would much rather watch Space Pilot 3000.Now that was a show.Frozen pizza boy and a one eyed chick,some robot that bends metal.....Anyone who likes this futurama thing can "bite my shiny metal ass.
"As long as you don't make me smell Uranus.
To prevent 'Your anus' jokes we renamed it.
. .
Urectum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264343</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1244556360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That works for some characters, but Futurama is unlikely to be anything close to as good without a few of the key voice actors.  It's not just the voices, it's the five completed seasons of being in character for all those characters that they cover.  Each one of them has perfected those voices, which is not a quick task even for the best voice actors you can find (arguably, a list starting out with four or five members of the Futurama cast).</htmltext>
<tokenext>That works for some characters , but Futurama is unlikely to be anything close to as good without a few of the key voice actors .
It 's not just the voices , it 's the five completed seasons of being in character for all those characters that they cover .
Each one of them has perfected those voices , which is not a quick task even for the best voice actors you can find ( arguably , a list starting out with four or five members of the Futurama cast ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That works for some characters, but Futurama is unlikely to be anything close to as good without a few of the key voice actors.
It's not just the voices, it's the five completed seasons of being in character for all those characters that they cover.
Each one of them has perfected those voices, which is not a quick task even for the best voice actors you can find (arguably, a list starting out with four or five members of the Futurama cast).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263193</id>
	<title>bonk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244544660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GEILOZACK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GEILOZACK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GEILOZACK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268093</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>jazzmans</author>
	<datestamp>1244571480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good News, Everyone!</p><p>It was obvious to me when goodman wasn't santa in the second Xmas special, looking up the credits just proved it.<br>AFAIK, all the original voice actors will be in the new series.</p><p>The second greatest Tv series ever! (south park is the king)</p><p>Now I can't wait to get my own torgo's executive powder.</p><p>jaz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good News , Everyone ! It was obvious to me when goodman was n't santa in the second Xmas special , looking up the credits just proved it.AFAIK , all the original voice actors will be in the new series.The second greatest Tv series ever !
( south park is the king ) Now I ca n't wait to get my own torgo 's executive powder.jaz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good News, Everyone!It was obvious to me when goodman wasn't santa in the second Xmas special, looking up the credits just proved it.AFAIK, all the original voice actors will be in the new series.The second greatest Tv series ever!
(south park is the king)Now I can't wait to get my own torgo's executive powder.jaz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28274355</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>uberjack</author>
	<datestamp>1244560980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're a horse's butt?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're a horse 's butt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're a horse's butt?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265701</id>
	<title>Re:For fuck sake...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244562600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps an online petition would do the trick?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps an online petition would do the trick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps an online petition would do the trick?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239</id>
	<title>Into the Wild Green Yonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244545080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if it will continue from where <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Into\_the\_Wild\_Green\_Yonder" title="wikipedia.org">Into the Wild Green Yonder</a> [wikipedia.org] left off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if it will continue from where Into the Wild Green Yonder [ wikipedia.org ] left off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if it will continue from where Into the Wild Green Yonder [wikipedia.org] left off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265183</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>Gabbermatt</author>
	<datestamp>1244560260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one likes Meg, so she doesn't matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one likes Meg , so she does n't matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one likes Meg, so she doesn't matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269675</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>nofx\_3</author>
	<datestamp>1244576940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fry and Zoidberg are both voiced by the same person (Billy West), who I can all but guarantee would return for any additional shows (he always speaks very highly of the project).  Leela's voice is basically just Katey Segals voice (Peg Bundy from Married with Children) would be extremely difficult to replace if she did not return.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fry and Zoidberg are both voiced by the same person ( Billy West ) , who I can all but guarantee would return for any additional shows ( he always speaks very highly of the project ) .
Leela 's voice is basically just Katey Segals voice ( Peg Bundy from Married with Children ) would be extremely difficult to replace if she did not return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fry and Zoidberg are both voiced by the same person (Billy West), who I can all but guarantee would return for any additional shows (he always speaks very highly of the project).
Leela's voice is basically just Katey Segals voice (Peg Bundy from Married with Children) would be extremely difficult to replace if she did not return.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215</id>
	<title>I hope it's funny!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244544840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Futurama isn't funny. That's why it was cancelled. It's like watching an animated sitcom - everyone gets their line. That actress who does the voice of the one-eyed girl is so incredibly annoying - other than Married with Children, everything she's in is crap.
<p>
I know no-one on Slashdot agrees with me. I'm sure it's because you're sucked in by the old "haha, that's a nerdy reference I understand, this is funny" trick. (see xkcd , although xkcd is sometimes funny).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Futurama is n't funny .
That 's why it was cancelled .
It 's like watching an animated sitcom - everyone gets their line .
That actress who does the voice of the one-eyed girl is so incredibly annoying - other than Married with Children , everything she 's in is crap .
I know no-one on Slashdot agrees with me .
I 'm sure it 's because you 're sucked in by the old " haha , that 's a nerdy reference I understand , this is funny " trick .
( see xkcd , although xkcd is sometimes funny ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Futurama isn't funny.
That's why it was cancelled.
It's like watching an animated sitcom - everyone gets their line.
That actress who does the voice of the one-eyed girl is so incredibly annoying - other than Married with Children, everything she's in is crap.
I know no-one on Slashdot agrees with me.
I'm sure it's because you're sucked in by the old "haha, that's a nerdy reference I understand, this is funny" trick.
(see xkcd , although xkcd is sometimes funny).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263545</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1244549220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And as long as the quality returns to that of the series, and doesn't stay at the level of the (later, at least) movies...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And as long as the quality returns to that of the series , and does n't stay at the level of the ( later , at least ) movies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And as long as the quality returns to that of the series, and doesn't stay at the level of the (later, at least) movies...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28272803</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>wgoodman</author>
	<datestamp>1244548620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's
<a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41357" title="aintitcool.com" rel="nofollow">Official-er!</a> [aintitcool.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's Official-er !
[ aintitcool.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's
Official-er!
[aintitcool.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263873</id>
	<title>Waste</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1244552940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TV is such a waste.  I would rather spend my time playing with linux or playing on the piano or learning about Jesus.  All these things will advance me in life.  Watching stuff like this will hold me back in life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TV is such a waste .
I would rather spend my time playing with linux or playing on the piano or learning about Jesus .
All these things will advance me in life .
Watching stuff like this will hold me back in life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TV is such a waste.
I would rather spend my time playing with linux or playing on the piano or learning about Jesus.
All these things will advance me in life.
Watching stuff like this will hold me back in life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263617</id>
	<title>Re:Cut and Paste</title>
	<author>Svippy</author>
	<datestamp>1244550180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Incidentally, if you watch the first season (production season, obviously) again, you will notice (in particular Hermes, but this also continues into season 2 for him) that several, if not all the characters' voices sound a lot different than they do later on, in season 3 and 4.</p><p>In my opinion, I can slightly feel that the actors were slightly rusty when they began voicing the films, but you quickly get over it, that, or they started to get a grip of their characters' voices.  But since casting is probably not for the main characters, but rather for guest characters, I don't think you should put that much into it.  Alternatively; it may just be a technicality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Incidentally , if you watch the first season ( production season , obviously ) again , you will notice ( in particular Hermes , but this also continues into season 2 for him ) that several , if not all the characters ' voices sound a lot different than they do later on , in season 3 and 4.In my opinion , I can slightly feel that the actors were slightly rusty when they began voicing the films , but you quickly get over it , that , or they started to get a grip of their characters ' voices .
But since casting is probably not for the main characters , but rather for guest characters , I do n't think you should put that much into it .
Alternatively ; it may just be a technicality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incidentally, if you watch the first season (production season, obviously) again, you will notice (in particular Hermes, but this also continues into season 2 for him) that several, if not all the characters' voices sound a lot different than they do later on, in season 3 and 4.In my opinion, I can slightly feel that the actors were slightly rusty when they began voicing the films, but you quickly get over it, that, or they started to get a grip of their characters' voices.
But since casting is probably not for the main characters, but rather for guest characters, I don't think you should put that much into it.
Alternatively; it may just be a technicality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266997</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>thebigbadme</author>
	<datestamp>1244567340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, well, in Soviet Russia...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , well , in Soviet Russia.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, well, in Soviet Russia...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263095</id>
	<title>Good news</title>
	<author>illumastorm</author>
	<datestamp>1244543400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good news, everyone!  The site is already not loading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news , everyone !
The site is already not loading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news, everyone!
The site is already not loading.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263085</id>
	<title>Brought to you by:</title>
	<author>derGoldstein</author>
	<datestamp>1244543340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brought to you by: <i>Torgo's Executive Powder! "a million and one uses!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brought to you by : Torgo 's Executive Powder !
" a million and one uses !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brought to you by: Torgo's Executive Powder!
"a million and one uses!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</id>
	<title>The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>abigsmurf</author>
	<datestamp>1244545980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the first film they seemed to get progressively worse, both in terms of story and in terms of jokes. I know they had fewer writers working on them but the jokes weren't as snappy the plots didn't flow properly (Benders Game was the worst for that) and they relied too much on references to previous jokes and stories, one of the worst things about post season 10 Simpsons was how insular the humour became.</p><p>If it was because they struggled to fill the running time than a new series could be brilliant. If it's because the current writers aren't a patch on the original team, it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the first film they seemed to get progressively worse , both in terms of story and in terms of jokes .
I know they had fewer writers working on them but the jokes were n't as snappy the plots did n't flow properly ( Benders Game was the worst for that ) and they relied too much on references to previous jokes and stories , one of the worst things about post season 10 Simpsons was how insular the humour became.If it was because they struggled to fill the running time than a new series could be brilliant .
If it 's because the current writers are n't a patch on the original team , it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the first film they seemed to get progressively worse, both in terms of story and in terms of jokes.
I know they had fewer writers working on them but the jokes weren't as snappy the plots didn't flow properly (Benders Game was the worst for that) and they relied too much on references to previous jokes and stories, one of the worst things about post season 10 Simpsons was how insular the humour became.If it was because they struggled to fill the running time than a new series could be brilliant.
If it's because the current writers aren't a patch on the original team, it could go the family guy route of being stale almost immediately after it returned to screens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28270803</id>
	<title>That will teach those inepts executives</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244538420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at BOX network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at BOX network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at BOX network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266719</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1244566500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Comedy Central doesn't seem to censor South Park too badly.  I mean, maybe they do, but that show still gets away with an awful lot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comedy Central does n't seem to censor South Park too badly .
I mean , maybe they do , but that show still gets away with an awful lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comedy Central doesn't seem to censor South Park too badly.
I mean, maybe they do, but that show still gets away with an awful lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264089</id>
	<title>I won't watch it on Comedy Central</title>
	<author>AMSmith42</author>
	<datestamp>1244554560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comedy Central took Futurama away from Adult Swim who faithfully aired it for years in syndication. Adult Swim fans were the sole reason Futurama was revived. Adult Swim doesn't seem to get one bit of gratitude from Comedy Central or Fox. I love Futurama, but I'm not going to turn my back on Adult Swim and reward Comedy Central by watching it anymore. If I get withdrawals, I'll just Netflix it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comedy Central took Futurama away from Adult Swim who faithfully aired it for years in syndication .
Adult Swim fans were the sole reason Futurama was revived .
Adult Swim does n't seem to get one bit of gratitude from Comedy Central or Fox .
I love Futurama , but I 'm not going to turn my back on Adult Swim and reward Comedy Central by watching it anymore .
If I get withdrawals , I 'll just Netflix it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comedy Central took Futurama away from Adult Swim who faithfully aired it for years in syndication.
Adult Swim fans were the sole reason Futurama was revived.
Adult Swim doesn't seem to get one bit of gratitude from Comedy Central or Fox.
I love Futurama, but I'm not going to turn my back on Adult Swim and reward Comedy Central by watching it anymore.
If I get withdrawals, I'll just Netflix it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263271</id>
	<title>Re:I hope it's funny!</title>
	<author>daniel\_mcl</author>
	<datestamp>1244545680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that the reason that nobody on Slashdot agrees with you has more than a little to do with the fact that you're a "Married with Children" fan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that the reason that nobody on Slashdot agrees with you has more than a little to do with the fact that you 're a " Married with Children " fan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that the reason that nobody on Slashdot agrees with you has more than a little to do with the fact that you're a "Married with Children" fan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265401</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244561160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think Family Guy sucks but you enjoy Ren and Stimpy?</p><p>Go piss on an electric fence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think Family Guy sucks but you enjoy Ren and Stimpy ? Go piss on an electric fence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think Family Guy sucks but you enjoy Ren and Stimpy?Go piss on an electric fence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264207</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>CaseCrash</author>
	<datestamp>1244555460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The episodes I've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck.</p> </div><p>Watch the old ones, not the new ones</p><p><div class="quote"><p>And WTF is "The Life and Times of Tim" ? If that is a "hit US comedy", then they missed an S in the summary. Furthermore, if that's a hit, I would really hate to see the misses.</p></div><p>I'm an american who watches cable tv everyday and I've never heard of it. Don't believe the internet as to what's a "Hit"</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Bring back Ren and Stimpy !</p></div><p>I second this motion (except they fucked up with the "new" ren &amp; stimpy episodes they made a couple years ago *shudder*)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The episodes I 've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck .
Watch the old ones , not the new onesAnd WTF is " The Life and Times of Tim " ?
If that is a " hit US comedy " , then they missed an S in the summary .
Furthermore , if that 's a hit , I would really hate to see the misses.I 'm an american who watches cable tv everyday and I 've never heard of it .
Do n't believe the internet as to what 's a " Hit " Bring back Ren and Stimpy ! I second this motion ( except they fucked up with the " new " ren &amp; stimpy episodes they made a couple years ago * shudder * )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The episodes I've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck.
Watch the old ones, not the new onesAnd WTF is "The Life and Times of Tim" ?
If that is a "hit US comedy", then they missed an S in the summary.
Furthermore, if that's a hit, I would really hate to see the misses.I'm an american who watches cable tv everyday and I've never heard of it.
Don't believe the internet as to what's a "Hit"Bring back Ren and Stimpy !I second this motion (except they fucked up with the "new" ren &amp; stimpy episodes they made a couple years ago *shudder*)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266859</id>
	<title>Please, be real!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244566860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love Futurama, I'm willing that information is true</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love Futurama , I 'm willing that information is true</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love Futurama, I'm willing that information is true</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28277789</id>
	<title>Casting?</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1244638920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There casting??? What happened to the original cast?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There casting ? ? ?
What happened to the original cast ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There casting???
What happened to the original cast?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266063</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>evilned</author>
	<datestamp>1244563920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy a few years ago. It sucked.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren\_\%26\_Stimpy\_\%22Adult\_Party\_Cartoon\%22" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren\_\%26\_Stimpy\_\%22Adult\_Party\_Cartoon\%22</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy a few years ago .
It sucked.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren \ _ \ % 26 \ _Stimpy \ _ \ % 22Adult \ _Party \ _Cartoon \ % 22 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy a few years ago.
It sucked.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren\_\%26\_Stimpy\_\%22Adult\_Party\_Cartoon\%22 [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265037</id>
	<title>Re:The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244559600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I really liked Bender's Big Score, and Into the Wild Green Yonder. They had actual plots, and they both felt like single, longer episodes of Futurama. They did contain slightly too much filler, and they might have been better if they'd trimmed it a bit. Instead of having each one being three episodes long, maybe two would have worked better.</p><p>Bender's Game was OK, but it basically felt like a series of jokes and D&amp;D references strung together. The parts were kind of funny in places (although I'd have got nothing out of it had I known nothing about D&amp;D), but as a whole it didn't really work. No plot as such, and kind of dodgy pacing.</p><p>As for The Beast with a Billion Backs... The less said about that, the better. While it wasn't bad - it was certainly better than any Simpsons episode produced this century - it just didn't work.</p><p>Futurama doesn't really work in such a long format. I think the time limit was helpful here - the writers were forced to cut out parts that didn't work, to streamline the script, and make every line count. Much the same problem happened in the Simpsons movie - there was just so much stuff in there that didn't really work, and would have been cut if they hadn't had an entire movie to fill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I really liked Bender 's Big Score , and Into the Wild Green Yonder .
They had actual plots , and they both felt like single , longer episodes of Futurama .
They did contain slightly too much filler , and they might have been better if they 'd trimmed it a bit .
Instead of having each one being three episodes long , maybe two would have worked better.Bender 's Game was OK , but it basically felt like a series of jokes and D&amp;D references strung together .
The parts were kind of funny in places ( although I 'd have got nothing out of it had I known nothing about D&amp;D ) , but as a whole it did n't really work .
No plot as such , and kind of dodgy pacing.As for The Beast with a Billion Backs... The less said about that , the better .
While it was n't bad - it was certainly better than any Simpsons episode produced this century - it just did n't work.Futurama does n't really work in such a long format .
I think the time limit was helpful here - the writers were forced to cut out parts that did n't work , to streamline the script , and make every line count .
Much the same problem happened in the Simpsons movie - there was just so much stuff in there that did n't really work , and would have been cut if they had n't had an entire movie to fill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I really liked Bender's Big Score, and Into the Wild Green Yonder.
They had actual plots, and they both felt like single, longer episodes of Futurama.
They did contain slightly too much filler, and they might have been better if they'd trimmed it a bit.
Instead of having each one being three episodes long, maybe two would have worked better.Bender's Game was OK, but it basically felt like a series of jokes and D&amp;D references strung together.
The parts were kind of funny in places (although I'd have got nothing out of it had I known nothing about D&amp;D), but as a whole it didn't really work.
No plot as such, and kind of dodgy pacing.As for The Beast with a Billion Backs... The less said about that, the better.
While it wasn't bad - it was certainly better than any Simpsons episode produced this century - it just didn't work.Futurama doesn't really work in such a long format.
I think the time limit was helpful here - the writers were forced to cut out parts that didn't work, to streamline the script, and make every line count.
Much the same problem happened in the Simpsons movie - there was just so much stuff in there that didn't really work, and would have been cut if they hadn't had an entire movie to fill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265827</id>
	<title>Re:Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244563080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy in a much less censored version geared more towards adults awhile back, although I can't remember exactly who and when (Google it) I thought it would be good, watched one episode and saw Ren pounding Stimpy in the ass, which was basically akin to my childhood being buttraped... Some shows should never come back. Others should have, like Family Guy and Futurama, both great shows that were prematurely killed off by the idiots at FOX.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy in a much less censored version geared more towards adults awhile back , although I ca n't remember exactly who and when ( Google it ) I thought it would be good , watched one episode and saw Ren pounding Stimpy in the ass , which was basically akin to my childhood being buttraped... Some shows should never come back .
Others should have , like Family Guy and Futurama , both great shows that were prematurely killed off by the idiots at FOX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did bring back Ren and Stimpy in a much less censored version geared more towards adults awhile back, although I can't remember exactly who and when (Google it) I thought it would be good, watched one episode and saw Ren pounding Stimpy in the ass, which was basically akin to my childhood being buttraped... Some shows should never come back.
Others should have, like Family Guy and Futurama, both great shows that were prematurely killed off by the idiots at FOX.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263191</id>
	<title>Let's hope the Family Guy effect holds true</title>
	<author>meist3r</author>
	<datestamp>1244544600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you get cancelled, voted back on petitions, re-released as direct-to-dvd and get back on TV you can stay no matter how crap most of your episodes are. I truly love Seth MacFarlane's shows but some of it is just: meh (and that's a gross overstatement). Even more so after they got back on the air. The Futurama movies were twice as long as they should have been. I would have liked 45min episodes much better.<br> <br>

Blackjack and Hookers or we are all doomed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... DOOOOOOMED.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you get cancelled , voted back on petitions , re-released as direct-to-dvd and get back on TV you can stay no matter how crap most of your episodes are .
I truly love Seth MacFarlane 's shows but some of it is just : meh ( and that 's a gross overstatement ) .
Even more so after they got back on the air .
The Futurama movies were twice as long as they should have been .
I would have liked 45min episodes much better .
Blackjack and Hookers or we are all doomed ... DOOOOOOMED .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you get cancelled, voted back on petitions, re-released as direct-to-dvd and get back on TV you can stay no matter how crap most of your episodes are.
I truly love Seth MacFarlane's shows but some of it is just: meh (and that's a gross overstatement).
Even more so after they got back on the air.
The Futurama movies were twice as long as they should have been.
I would have liked 45min episodes much better.
Blackjack and Hookers or we are all doomed ... DOOOOOOMED.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267615</id>
	<title>Don't re-hash the movies, please!</title>
	<author>Vrallis</author>
	<datestamp>1244569500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just hope that their return isn't like Family Guy and Tripping the Rift, where they just start out by hacking up a movie into half a season worth of episodes (and call it a full season, too).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope that their return is n't like Family Guy and Tripping the Rift , where they just start out by hacking up a movie into half a season worth of episodes ( and call it a full season , too ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope that their return isn't like Family Guy and Tripping the Rift, where they just start out by hacking up a movie into half a season worth of episodes (and call it a full season, too).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264221</id>
	<title>Good news, everyone? NOT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244555580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG, that show fucking sucked.  Is Comedy Central trying to follow in the steps of the Sci Fi channel?  You know, replacing all of their good programs with 3rd rate crap until all you're left with is crappy CGI dinosaurs 24/7 365?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG , that show fucking sucked .
Is Comedy Central trying to follow in the steps of the Sci Fi channel ?
You know , replacing all of their good programs with 3rd rate crap until all you 're left with is crappy CGI dinosaurs 24/7 365 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG, that show fucking sucked.
Is Comedy Central trying to follow in the steps of the Sci Fi channel?
You know, replacing all of their good programs with 3rd rate crap until all you're left with is crappy CGI dinosaurs 24/7 365?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28270305</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>SwordsmanLuke</author>
	<datestamp>1244579460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the reason for this is that it's easy to be (at least marginally) funny when you're allowed to be crude.  Look at the million and a half "Teen Movie" films.  They're not great, but they get a lot of mileage out of quick bawdy gags.<br> <br>While I'm not a fan of censorship, I do feel that the pressure it provides to avoid the easy but bawdy gags forces writers to think a little longer and the result is a better (if cleaner) joke.  I'm no prude, I love the odd dirty joke, but that's not the tone of Futurama.  It's at its best when its jokes are geeky, not dirty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the reason for this is that it 's easy to be ( at least marginally ) funny when you 're allowed to be crude .
Look at the million and a half " Teen Movie " films .
They 're not great , but they get a lot of mileage out of quick bawdy gags .
While I 'm not a fan of censorship , I do feel that the pressure it provides to avoid the easy but bawdy gags forces writers to think a little longer and the result is a better ( if cleaner ) joke .
I 'm no prude , I love the odd dirty joke , but that 's not the tone of Futurama .
It 's at its best when its jokes are geeky , not dirty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the reason for this is that it's easy to be (at least marginally) funny when you're allowed to be crude.
Look at the million and a half "Teen Movie" films.
They're not great, but they get a lot of mileage out of quick bawdy gags.
While I'm not a fan of censorship, I do feel that the pressure it provides to avoid the easy but bawdy gags forces writers to think a little longer and the result is a better (if cleaner) joke.
I'm no prude, I love the odd dirty joke, but that's not the tone of Futurama.
It's at its best when its jokes are geeky, not dirty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264239</id>
	<title>Re:Bite my shiny metal ass!!</title>
	<author>tuxicle</author>
	<datestamp>1244555700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Antique-ing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Antique-ing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Antique-ing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263993</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244553900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm old enough to remember when they replaced the Flintstone's character "Barney"s voice-actor in the 1960s<br>It always sounded weird to me... I can't imagine Fry or Lela or Dr. Zoidberg having different voices<br>Amy could probably be replaced and the rastafarian guy, but most of the others cannot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm old enough to remember when they replaced the Flintstone 's character " Barney " s voice-actor in the 1960sIt always sounded weird to me... I ca n't imagine Fry or Lela or Dr. Zoidberg having different voicesAmy could probably be replaced and the rastafarian guy , but most of the others can not</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm old enough to remember when they replaced the Flintstone's character "Barney"s voice-actor in the 1960sIt always sounded weird to me... I can't imagine Fry or Lela or Dr. Zoidberg having different voicesAmy could probably be replaced and the rastafarian guy, but most of the others cannot</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1244554440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.</p></div><p>Let's hope it's all the original cast. Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).</p></div><p>Of course, Meg Griffin has been voiced by three different actresses (not counting the ones used for singing), so it wouldn't necessarily be the kiss of death for the show.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though still technically a rumor at this point , word is that 'Futurama ' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.Let 's hope it 's all the original cast .
Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic , either ( to paraphrase Family Guy ) .Of course , Meg Griffin has been voiced by three different actresses ( not counting the ones used for singing ) , so it would n't necessarily be the kiss of death for the show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though still technically a rumor at this point, word is that 'Futurama' production offices have already opened and that casting is about to move forward.Let's hope it's all the original cast.
Wrong-sounding Muppets where no picnic, either (to paraphrase Family Guy).Of course, Meg Griffin has been voiced by three different actresses (not counting the ones used for singing), so it wouldn't necessarily be the kiss of death for the show.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083</id>
	<title>"Have you ever tried just turning off the TV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244543280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>sitting down with your children<br> <br>

and hitting them?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>sitting down with your children and hitting them ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sitting down with your children 

and hitting them?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271419</id>
	<title>Re:For fuck sake...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244541060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no, Like the Simpsons, and I have watched since the beginning..yes THAT beginning.</p><p>I still enjoy there witty commentary on modern culture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no , Like the Simpsons , and I have watched since the beginning..yes THAT beginning.I still enjoy there witty commentary on modern culture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, Like the Simpsons, and I have watched since the beginning..yes THAT beginning.I still enjoy there witty commentary on modern culture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264669</id>
	<title>Re:Bite my shiny metal ass!!</title>
	<author>TheTrollToll</author>
	<datestamp>1244557980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As every good commander knows, one of the most important tactics in army is the element of surprise...
SURPRISE!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>As every good commander knows , one of the most important tactics in army is the element of surprise.. .
SURPRISE ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As every good commander knows, one of the most important tactics in army is the element of surprise...
SURPRISE!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263209</id>
	<title>Direct-to-DVD "movies"</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1244544840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They may have been "Direct-to-DVD", but I don't think it took them long to then go "and onwards to Sky TV as multi-part episodes". I know there aren't many Futurama episodes, but Sky seem to have played the "Direct to DVD" ones more than normal!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They may have been " Direct-to-DVD " , but I do n't think it took them long to then go " and onwards to Sky TV as multi-part episodes " .
I know there are n't many Futurama episodes , but Sky seem to have played the " Direct to DVD " ones more than normal !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may have been "Direct-to-DVD", but I don't think it took them long to then go "and onwards to Sky TV as multi-part episodes".
I know there aren't many Futurama episodes, but Sky seem to have played the "Direct to DVD" ones more than normal!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263867</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244552880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Family Guy, the show that replaces Lacey Chabert with Mila Kunas in Season 2?  People deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Family Guy , the show that replaces Lacey Chabert with Mila Kunas in Season 2 ?
People deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Family Guy, the show that replaces Lacey Chabert with Mila Kunas in Season 2?
People deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264463</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Coraon</author>
	<datestamp>1244556960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this show has more lives then zombie Jesus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this show has more lives then zombie Jesus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this show has more lives then zombie Jesus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264645</id>
	<title>Thanks, Slashdot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244557800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Add some Futurma ascii to your cowsay folder and this to your bash aliases:<blockquote><div><p> <tt>function futurama() { wee=$(curl -Is slashdot.org | egrep '^X-(F|B|L)' | sed 's/^..//'); if [[ $wee = "Fry"* ]]; then cowsay -f fry $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Fry:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//'); fi; if [[ $wee = "Ben"* ]]; then cowsay -f bender $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Bender:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//'); fi; if [[ $wee = "Lee"* ]]; then cowsay -f leela $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Leela:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//'); fi; }</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Add some Futurma ascii to your cowsay folder and this to your bash aliases : function futurama ( ) { wee = $ ( curl -Is slashdot.org | egrep ' ^ X- ( F | B | L ) ' | sed 's/ ^ ..// ' ) ; if [ [ $ wee = " Fry " * ] ] ; then cowsay -f fry $ ( echo $ wee | sed 's/ ^ Fry : // ' ) ; fi ; if [ [ $ wee = " Ben " * ] ] ; then cowsay -f bender $ ( echo $ wee | sed 's/ ^ Bender : // ' ) ; fi ; if [ [ $ wee = " Lee " * ] ] ; then cowsay -f leela $ ( echo $ wee | sed 's/ ^ Leela : // ' ) ; fi ; }</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add some Futurma ascii to your cowsay folder and this to your bash aliases: function futurama() { wee=$(curl -Is slashdot.org | egrep '^X-(F|B|L)' | sed 's/^..//'); if [[ $wee = "Fry"* ]]; then cowsay -f fry $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Fry: //'); fi; if [[ $wee = "Ben"* ]]; then cowsay -f bender $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Bender: //'); fi; if [[ $wee = "Lee"* ]]; then cowsay -f leela $(echo $wee | sed 's/^Leela: //'); fi; } 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266565</id>
	<title>Re:I won't watch it on Comedy Central</title>
	<author>whiledo</author>
	<datestamp>1244566080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, what?  Did you not listen to the commentary on the Futurama DVDs?  It's an <i>incredibly</i> expensive show to make - the most expensive animated show of all time.  It takes <b>nine months</b> to make an episode.  That's nine months of labor, plus all the cost for doing all the 3d effects they do.  We're talking about in the ballpark of a <b>million dollars per episode.</b></p><p>Now, Adult Swim was great in playing all the reruns of Futurama.  But they paid 10 million dollars to rerun the hell out of 72 episodes.  That's chump change compared to how much it costs to actually make <i>original</i> episodes.  Do you think Cartoon Network was willing to shell out the kind of money that they need to even just cover costs?</p><p>Not bloody likely.  That's not in the profit model of Cartoon Network.  Yes, they are a business just like all the other channels.</p><p>So if you want to support <b>Futurama</b>, then be realistic and realize that this has nothing to do with not showing gratitude to Adult Swim.  Having Comedy Central shell out for new episodes of Futurama will actually help Adult Swim, as now they'll be able to buy the reruns for those.  It's win-win!  Turning your back on Comedy Central in effect is also screwing over Adult Swim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , what ?
Did you not listen to the commentary on the Futurama DVDs ?
It 's an incredibly expensive show to make - the most expensive animated show of all time .
It takes nine months to make an episode .
That 's nine months of labor , plus all the cost for doing all the 3d effects they do .
We 're talking about in the ballpark of a million dollars per episode.Now , Adult Swim was great in playing all the reruns of Futurama .
But they paid 10 million dollars to rerun the hell out of 72 episodes .
That 's chump change compared to how much it costs to actually make original episodes .
Do you think Cartoon Network was willing to shell out the kind of money that they need to even just cover costs ? Not bloody likely .
That 's not in the profit model of Cartoon Network .
Yes , they are a business just like all the other channels.So if you want to support Futurama , then be realistic and realize that this has nothing to do with not showing gratitude to Adult Swim .
Having Comedy Central shell out for new episodes of Futurama will actually help Adult Swim , as now they 'll be able to buy the reruns for those .
It 's win-win !
Turning your back on Comedy Central in effect is also screwing over Adult Swim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, what?
Did you not listen to the commentary on the Futurama DVDs?
It's an incredibly expensive show to make - the most expensive animated show of all time.
It takes nine months to make an episode.
That's nine months of labor, plus all the cost for doing all the 3d effects they do.
We're talking about in the ballpark of a million dollars per episode.Now, Adult Swim was great in playing all the reruns of Futurama.
But they paid 10 million dollars to rerun the hell out of 72 episodes.
That's chump change compared to how much it costs to actually make original episodes.
Do you think Cartoon Network was willing to shell out the kind of money that they need to even just cover costs?Not bloody likely.
That's not in the profit model of Cartoon Network.
Yes, they are a business just like all the other channels.So if you want to support Futurama, then be realistic and realize that this has nothing to do with not showing gratitude to Adult Swim.
Having Comedy Central shell out for new episodes of Futurama will actually help Adult Swim, as now they'll be able to buy the reruns for those.
It's win-win!
Turning your back on Comedy Central in effect is also screwing over Adult Swim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244549100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The episodes I've seen of Futurama have been good. I've not seen many, as I don't subscribe to pay tv. The episodes I've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck. And WTF is "The Life and Times of Tim" ? If that is a "hit US comedy", then they missed an S in the summary. Furthermore, if that's a hit, I would really hate to see the misses.<br>Bring back Ren and Stimpy !</htmltext>
<tokenext>The episodes I 've seen of Futurama have been good .
I 've not seen many , as I do n't subscribe to pay tv .
The episodes I 've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck .
And WTF is " The Life and Times of Tim " ?
If that is a " hit US comedy " , then they missed an S in the summary .
Furthermore , if that 's a hit , I would really hate to see the misses.Bring back Ren and Stimpy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The episodes I've seen of Futurama have been good.
I've not seen many, as I don't subscribe to pay tv.
The episodes I've seen of Family Guy uniformly suck.
And WTF is "The Life and Times of Tim" ?
If that is a "hit US comedy", then they missed an S in the summary.
Furthermore, if that's a hit, I would really hate to see the misses.Bring back Ren and Stimpy !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264193</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1244555400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All problems are communication problems   All glory to the hypnotoad!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All problems are communication problems All glory to the hypnotoad !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All problems are communication problems   All glory to the hypnotoad!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263907</id>
	<title>Morbo mocks your foolish comedy!</title>
	<author>Drakkenmensch</author>
	<datestamp>1244553300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It shall be obliterated when the invasion fleet reduces your puny civilization to ashes! Now let's go to entertainment news.

*Mary Heart look-alike laughs vapidly*</htmltext>
<tokenext>It shall be obliterated when the invasion fleet reduces your puny civilization to ashes !
Now let 's go to entertainment news .
* Mary Heart look-alike laughs vapidly *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It shall be obliterated when the invasion fleet reduces your puny civilization to ashes!
Now let's go to entertainment news.
*Mary Heart look-alike laughs vapidly*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263857</id>
	<title>Re:"Have you ever tried just turning off the TV</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1244552760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bender should not be allowed on television, according to Fathers Against Rude Television (FART).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bender should not be allowed on television , according to Fathers Against Rude Television ( FART ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bender should not be allowed on television, according to Fathers Against Rude Television (FART).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159</id>
	<title>Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244544240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as they get the original cast and no restrictions imposed on the show with regards to somebody thinking about "the children"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they get the original cast and no restrictions imposed on the show with regards to somebody thinking about " the children " : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they get the original cast and no restrictions imposed on the show with regards to somebody thinking about "the children" :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263791</id>
	<title>Too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244552100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many years has it been?  By now, all the actors will be older and they won't look the part.  It will be worse than Harry Potter or Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many years has it been ?
By now , all the actors will be older and they wo n't look the part .
It will be worse than Harry Potter or Bill and Ted 's Bogus Journey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many years has it been?
By now, all the actors will be older and they won't look the part.
It will be worse than Harry Potter or Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263091</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244543340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264871</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1244558820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read this in Farnsworth's voice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this in Farnsworth 's voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this in Farnsworth's voice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264537</id>
	<title>Re:For fuck sake...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244557320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We tried.  But they won't stay dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We tried .
But they wo n't stay dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We tried.
But they won't stay dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28273035</id>
	<title>Now confirmed</title>
	<author>zygotic mitosis</author>
	<datestamp>1244550120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Entertainment Weekly confirms it...

<a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/06/its-official-futurama-returns.html" title="ew.com" rel="nofollow">Futurama is not dying</a> [ew.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Entertainment Weekly confirms it.. . Futurama is not dying [ ew.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Entertainment Weekly confirms it...

Futurama is not dying [ew.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945</id>
	<title>Bite my shiny metal ass!!</title>
	<author>murphyd311</author>
	<datestamp>1244553600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>10. Chump<br>
9. Chumpette<br>
8. Yours<br>
7. Up<br>
6. Pimpmobile<br>
5. Bite<br>
4. My <br>
3. Shiny<br>
2. Daffodil<br>
1. Ass</htmltext>
<tokenext>10 .
Chump 9 .
Chumpette 8 .
Yours 7 .
Up 6 .
Pimpmobile 5 .
Bite 4 .
My 3 .
Shiny 2 .
Daffodil 1 .
Ass</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10.
Chump
9.
Chumpette
8.
Yours
7.
Up
6.
Pimpmobile
5.
Bite
4.
My 
3.
Shiny
2.
Daffodil
1.
Ass</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266267</id>
	<title>Re:Casting</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1244564760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you don't like some of the characters just watch for the ad in Variety and tell your favorite cartoon characters to go to the casting call.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't like some of the characters just watch for the ad in Variety and tell your favorite cartoon characters to go to the casting call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't like some of the characters just watch for the ad in Variety and tell your favorite cartoon characters to go to the casting call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264017</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244554140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's a suppository!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's a suppository !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's a suppository!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28277911</id>
	<title>Re:I hope it's funny!</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1244639940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now that I think about it, I nearly busted a gut laughing at Galaxy Quest [wikipedia.org], so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op.</p></div><p>Wow. I certainly would never admitted to knowing what that was like. You are very brave.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that I think about it , I nearly busted a gut laughing at Galaxy Quest [ wikipedia.org ] , so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op.Wow .
I certainly would never admitted to knowing what that was like .
You are very brave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that I think about it, I nearly busted a gut laughing at Galaxy Quest [wikipedia.org], so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op.Wow.
I certainly would never admitted to knowing what that was like.
You are very brave.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267663</id>
	<title>Re:The movies didn't work</title>
	<author>prestomation</author>
	<datestamp>1244569680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.  I thought Bender's Big Score was brilliant, but the other movies just seemed a little drawn out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I thought Bender 's Big Score was brilliant , but the other movies just seemed a little drawn out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I thought Bender's Big Score was brilliant, but the other movies just seemed a little drawn out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263415</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244547540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here, put on this hat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here , put on this hat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here, put on this hat</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263243</id>
	<title>Re:I hope it's funny!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244545080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yup. It's worse than Family Guy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup .
It 's worse than Family Guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup.
It's worse than Family Guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271539</id>
	<title>Still no Firefly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244541600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why must you torture us so. Not saying that Futurama is bad...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why must you torture us so .
Not saying that Futurama is bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why must you torture us so.
Not saying that Futurama is bad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865</id>
	<title>Re:Absolutely wonderful</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244552820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of the best jokes in the show were only there because of the censors forcing re-writes. What do we get the moment they have some wiggle-room? Bender's Big Score. I may hate censorship, but these writers don't seem to work well without it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the best jokes in the show were only there because of the censors forcing re-writes .
What do we get the moment they have some wiggle-room ?
Bender 's Big Score .
I may hate censorship , but these writers do n't seem to work well without it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the best jokes in the show were only there because of the censors forcing re-writes.
What do we get the moment they have some wiggle-room?
Bender's Big Score.
I may hate censorship, but these writers don't seem to work well without it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265619</id>
	<title>Re:Into the Wild Green Yonder</title>
	<author>Moebius Loop</author>
	<datestamp>1244562240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&lt;spoilers&gt;</p><p>I would think so. That was the whole point of that ending, to give them either a final conclusion (the crew is dead, or basically gone from our universe), or an easy way to back out of that conclusion.</p><p>Remember, they went through a wormhole earlier in the plot (the final hole of the golf course), and it only took them a "short" distance away, so they can pretty much pop up anywhere and go back to business as usual. There's no need (as someone else mentioned above) to 'reboot', or have them in a different universe, or anything like that.</p><p>&lt;/spoilers&gt;</p><p>One of the best things about Futurama is the characterization of the universe in the future. Basically anything can happen anytime anywhere, so there's never any need to use major plot devices to 'reboot' the plot.</p><p>OTOH, Futurama, unlike the Simpsons, is far more willing to make major continuity events, like the Fry and Leela situation. I'll be interested to see how they handle that; I'm embarrassed to say I knew enough about the show Friends that I wouldn't want to see the "Ross and Rachel" debacle take place on Futurama.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think so .
That was the whole point of that ending , to give them either a final conclusion ( the crew is dead , or basically gone from our universe ) , or an easy way to back out of that conclusion.Remember , they went through a wormhole earlier in the plot ( the final hole of the golf course ) , and it only took them a " short " distance away , so they can pretty much pop up anywhere and go back to business as usual .
There 's no need ( as someone else mentioned above ) to 'reboot ' , or have them in a different universe , or anything like that.One of the best things about Futurama is the characterization of the universe in the future .
Basically anything can happen anytime anywhere , so there 's never any need to use major plot devices to 'reboot ' the plot.OTOH , Futurama , unlike the Simpsons , is far more willing to make major continuity events , like the Fry and Leela situation .
I 'll be interested to see how they handle that ; I 'm embarrassed to say I knew enough about the show Friends that I would n't want to see the " Ross and Rachel " debacle take place on Futurama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think so.
That was the whole point of that ending, to give them either a final conclusion (the crew is dead, or basically gone from our universe), or an easy way to back out of that conclusion.Remember, they went through a wormhole earlier in the plot (the final hole of the golf course), and it only took them a "short" distance away, so they can pretty much pop up anywhere and go back to business as usual.
There's no need (as someone else mentioned above) to 'reboot', or have them in a different universe, or anything like that.One of the best things about Futurama is the characterization of the universe in the future.
Basically anything can happen anytime anywhere, so there's never any need to use major plot devices to 'reboot' the plot.OTOH, Futurama, unlike the Simpsons, is far more willing to make major continuity events, like the Fry and Leela situation.
I'll be interested to see how they handle that; I'm embarrassed to say I knew enough about the show Friends that I wouldn't want to see the "Ross and Rachel" debacle take place on Futurama.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266541</id>
	<title>uniU</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244565960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on universe, you big, mostly empty wuss. Give me all the juice you got.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on universe , you big , mostly empty wuss .
Give me all the juice you got .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on universe, you big, mostly empty wuss.
Give me all the juice you got.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263265</id>
	<title>Re:I hope it's funny!</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1244545620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that you explain it that way, it seems so obvious: I just <em>think</em> it's funny because I enjoy watching it and it makes me laugh by respectfully parodying beloved memes.  But since <em>you</em> don't get it, it must be objectively un-amusing, therefore I'm obviously just mired in cognitive dissonance.

</p><p>Now that I think about it, I nearly busted a gut laughing at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy\_Quest" title="wikipedia.org">Galaxy Quest</a> [wikipedia.org], so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that you explain it that way , it seems so obvious : I just think it 's funny because I enjoy watching it and it makes me laugh by respectfully parodying beloved memes .
But since you do n't get it , it must be objectively un-amusing , therefore I 'm obviously just mired in cognitive dissonance .
Now that I think about it , I nearly busted a gut laughing at Galaxy Quest [ wikipedia.org ] , so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that you explain it that way, it seems so obvious: I just think it's funny because I enjoy watching it and it makes me laugh by respectfully parodying beloved memes.
But since you don't get it, it must be objectively un-amusing, therefore I'm obviously just mired in cognitive dissonance.
Now that I think about it, I nearly busted a gut laughing at Galaxy Quest [wikipedia.org], so I guess by your measure that must suck harder than a Thai ladyboy trying to fund her final op.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266867</id>
	<title>Re:All hail The Merciful Lord Obama!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244566920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you like to stick your head in the proverbial sand when you look at the Iraq war, but the rest of us can see what a collosal and immoral mistake it was.</p><p>But, yeah, you go ahead and side with the "pro life" Republitards that killed thousands of innocent people for access to Iraq's oil.</p><p>Fucking murderous thieves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you like to stick your head in the proverbial sand when you look at the Iraq war , but the rest of us can see what a collosal and immoral mistake it was.But , yeah , you go ahead and side with the " pro life " Republitards that killed thousands of innocent people for access to Iraq 's oil.Fucking murderous thieves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you like to stick your head in the proverbial sand when you look at the Iraq war, but the rest of us can see what a collosal and immoral mistake it was.But, yeah, you go ahead and side with the "pro life" Republitards that killed thousands of innocent people for access to Iraq's oil.Fucking murderous thieves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271819</id>
	<title>Good...</title>
	<author>Alonzo Meatman</author>
	<datestamp>1244543100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe these will be funnier than the (mostly-disappointing) movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe these will be funnier than the ( mostly-disappointing ) movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe these will be funnier than the (mostly-disappointing) movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263345</id>
	<title>Good News (possibly)</title>
	<author>Apple Acolyte</author>
	<datestamp>1244546700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A new season of the show could represent good news, assuming that the writers still have sufficient material not yet exhausted. The movies had a lot of potential but just seemed not to translate to movie length well. Part of the problem with having movie length episodes was that it constrained the writers to working with overarching plots. Less comedic punch, under utilized, diluted characters and greater reliance on cheap gimmicks. The show just works better in 23 minutes. On the downside, the last season of the show had some really poor episodes (bordering close to average Family Guy episode on the crap scale), so if it turns out that those kinds of episodes are the best the creators can do, count me only reluctantly and perhaps inconsistently in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A new season of the show could represent good news , assuming that the writers still have sufficient material not yet exhausted .
The movies had a lot of potential but just seemed not to translate to movie length well .
Part of the problem with having movie length episodes was that it constrained the writers to working with overarching plots .
Less comedic punch , under utilized , diluted characters and greater reliance on cheap gimmicks .
The show just works better in 23 minutes .
On the downside , the last season of the show had some really poor episodes ( bordering close to average Family Guy episode on the crap scale ) , so if it turns out that those kinds of episodes are the best the creators can do , count me only reluctantly and perhaps inconsistently in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A new season of the show could represent good news, assuming that the writers still have sufficient material not yet exhausted.
The movies had a lot of potential but just seemed not to translate to movie length well.
Part of the problem with having movie length episodes was that it constrained the writers to working with overarching plots.
Less comedic punch, under utilized, diluted characters and greater reliance on cheap gimmicks.
The show just works better in 23 minutes.
On the downside, the last season of the show had some really poor episodes (bordering close to average Family Guy episode on the crap scale), so if it turns out that those kinds of episodes are the best the creators can do, count me only reluctantly and perhaps inconsistently in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263667</id>
	<title>I liked movie 2 &amp; 4,</title>
	<author>unami</author>
	<datestamp>1244550780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they were a different style than 1 &amp; 3 (more story, jokes less shallow).
but i absolutely agree with you, that "Benders Game" was worst.
Lame story &amp; the same joke repeated over 2 hours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they were a different style than 1 &amp; 3 ( more story , jokes less shallow ) .
but i absolutely agree with you , that " Benders Game " was worst .
Lame story &amp; the same joke repeated over 2 hours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they were a different style than 1 &amp; 3 (more story, jokes less shallow).
but i absolutely agree with you, that "Benders Game" was worst.
Lame story &amp; the same joke repeated over 2 hours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267297</id>
	<title>That's why Arrested Development failed</title>
	<author>BitterAndDrunk</author>
	<datestamp>1244568240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The jokes built on each other to the point that anyone following AD through season 2 thought it was brilliant, while newbies couldn't get what the fuss was about.<p>
It was also the best show on television for a time despite that failing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The jokes built on each other to the point that anyone following AD through season 2 thought it was brilliant , while newbies could n't get what the fuss was about .
It was also the best show on television for a time despite that failing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The jokes built on each other to the point that anyone following AD through season 2 thought it was brilliant, while newbies couldn't get what the fuss was about.
It was also the best show on television for a time despite that failing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266209</id>
	<title>Am I too late...</title>
	<author>KarlIsNotMyName</author>
	<datestamp>1244564460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to get karma from quoting Futurama?</htmltext>
<tokenext>to get karma from quoting Futurama ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to get karma from quoting Futurama?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28274355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28272803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266267
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28277911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267663
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28270305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263803
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268093
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_017249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28275133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263205
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28273035
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28270305
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265931
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263877
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28268551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264891
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265183
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263993
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28269675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266267
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28277911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267663
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28271493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_017249.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28274355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28265835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264871
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28266997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263177
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263779
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264193
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28275133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28267077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28263147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28272803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_017249.28264221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
