<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_06_2338233</id>
	<title>Microsoft's Bing Refuses Search Term "Sex" In India</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244290320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Apparently Microsoft is censoring search results for Bing in India and other countries.  If you try to search for the term 'sex,' along with lots of variations, from India using Microsoft's new search engine, an error message is returned that says, '<a href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html">the search sex may return sexually explicit content</a>. To get results, change your search terms.'  There's no preference setting or toggle-on-or-off choice; you simply cannot search for the term 'sex' in India if you are using Bing.  While a user still can change their country and try the non-Indian version of Bing, this seems like an unnecessary step and unnecessary censorship on the part of Microsoft.  Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Apparently Microsoft is censoring search results for Bing in India and other countries .
If you try to search for the term 'sex, ' along with lots of variations , from India using Microsoft 's new search engine , an error message is returned that says , 'the search sex may return sexually explicit content .
To get results , change your search terms .
' There 's no preference setting or toggle-on-or-off choice ; you simply can not search for the term 'sex ' in India if you are using Bing .
While a user still can change their country and try the non-Indian version of Bing , this seems like an unnecessary step and unnecessary censorship on the part of Microsoft .
Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Apparently Microsoft is censoring search results for Bing in India and other countries.
If you try to search for the term 'sex,' along with lots of variations, from India using Microsoft's new search engine, an error message is returned that says, 'the search sex may return sexually explicit content.
To get results, change your search terms.
'  There's no preference setting or toggle-on-or-off choice; you simply cannot search for the term 'sex' in India if you are using Bing.
While a user still can change their country and try the non-Indian version of Bing, this seems like an unnecessary step and unnecessary censorship on the part of Microsoft.
Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244299860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if you are German, or want to find German sites containing information on the number six (sex)?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you are German , or want to find German sites containing information on the number six ( sex ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you are German, or want to find German sites containing information on the number six (sex)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28279419</id>
	<title>Bing changes now gives results</title>
	<author>star99</author>
	<datestamp>1244647680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now the search results in bing site for sex does return results ( guys in Bing )
 Read Slashdot

thats great !!!!!!!!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now the search results in bing site for sex does return results ( guys in Bing ) Read Slashdot thats great ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now the search results in bing site for sex does return results ( guys in Bing )
 Read Slashdot

thats great !!!!!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241087</id>
	<title>Re:Pointing out the obvious...</title>
	<author>UziBeatle</author>
	<datestamp>1244387460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah , humbuggery.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama\_sutra" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama\_sutra</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>
&nbsp; That is the source of all true knowledge. If lord Wiki says thus, it is thus.</p><p>
&nbsp; Anyway, on subject and despite being beat to the punch.</p><p>
&nbsp; This blatant censorship is an outrage of the highest irony, considering India is the birth place<br>of the Kama Sutra papers.</p><p>
&nbsp; I smell a conspiracy of the deepest sort, perhaps one relating to the New World Order Revolutionary Army (TM Soros Group), to foment discontent and malfusion** among the masses and further their diabolical plans.</p><p>(** TM The Colbert Group)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah , humbuggery.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama \ _sutra [ wikipedia.org ]   That is the source of all true knowledge .
If lord Wiki says thus , it is thus .
  Anyway , on subject and despite being beat to the punch .
  This blatant censorship is an outrage of the highest irony , considering India is the birth placeof the Kama Sutra papers .
  I smell a conspiracy of the deepest sort , perhaps one relating to the New World Order Revolutionary Army ( TM Soros Group ) , to foment discontent and malfusion * * among the masses and further their diabolical plans .
( * * TM The Colbert Group )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah , humbuggery.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama\_sutra [wikipedia.org]
  That is the source of all true knowledge.
If lord Wiki says thus, it is thus.
  Anyway, on subject and despite being beat to the punch.
  This blatant censorship is an outrage of the highest irony, considering India is the birth placeof the Kama Sutra papers.
  I smell a conspiracy of the deepest sort, perhaps one relating to the New World Order Revolutionary Army (TM Soros Group), to foment discontent and malfusion** among the masses and further their diabolical plans.
(** TM The Colbert Group)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28244527</id>
	<title>Re:Any single female indian girls?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244372400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of Indian's WHAT seem to be posting?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of Indian 's WHAT seem to be posting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of Indian's WHAT seem to be posting?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239119</id>
	<title>Re:Foot, meet gun</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1244310240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People who do not want offensive content will just leave Google's default "moderate safe search" filter on.</p><p>I would also guess that the heavy internet users are not likely to be the most conservative people. Take a look at the Alexa list of the most popular sites in India. There are a good many porn sites in the <a href="http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/IN" title="alexa.com">top 100</a> [alexa.com]</p><p>If they are trying to avoid legal problems, it is a pretty poor attempt. You can still get sexually explicit content through more imaginative searches, and play the videos on the Bing site itself.</p><p>I wonder what your religious users will make of that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People who do not want offensive content will just leave Google 's default " moderate safe search " filter on.I would also guess that the heavy internet users are not likely to be the most conservative people .
Take a look at the Alexa list of the most popular sites in India .
There are a good many porn sites in the top 100 [ alexa.com ] If they are trying to avoid legal problems , it is a pretty poor attempt .
You can still get sexually explicit content through more imaginative searches , and play the videos on the Bing site itself.I wonder what your religious users will make of that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People who do not want offensive content will just leave Google's default "moderate safe search" filter on.I would also guess that the heavy internet users are not likely to be the most conservative people.
Take a look at the Alexa list of the most popular sites in India.
There are a good many porn sites in the top 100 [alexa.com]If they are trying to avoid legal problems, it is a pretty poor attempt.
You can still get sexually explicit content through more imaginative searches, and play the videos on the Bing site itself.I wonder what your religious users will make of that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28243645</id>
	<title>Here's the problem..</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1244365200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your suppose to use BLING to search for sex.. not bing.. sheesh !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your suppose to use BLING to search for sex.. not bing.. sheesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your suppose to use BLING to search for sex.. not bing.. sheesh !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238725</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244305020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well. Let's see... There are:</p><p>pornotube<br>youporn<br>keezmovies<br>tube8<br>redtube<br>etc, etc, etc.</p><p>I know them. Someone I know from the UAE knows them. You know them.</p><p>What's your point again? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well .
Let 's see... There are : pornotubeyoupornkeezmoviestube8redtubeetc , etc , etc.I know them .
Someone I know from the UAE knows them .
You know them.What 's your point again ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well.
Let's see... There are:pornotubeyoupornkeezmoviestube8redtubeetc, etc, etc.I know them.
Someone I know from the UAE knows them.
You know them.What's your point again?
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238557</id>
	<title>Isn't that, what the term...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244303220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XXX was invented for?</p><p>Seriously. Who searches for "sex"?</p><p>"two goats on fire, one cup"? Sure. "somethingsomething sex"? Yawn.</p><p>Give them a week, and they can't go back to Playboy level anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XXX was invented for ? Seriously .
Who searches for " sex " ?
" two goats on fire , one cup " ?
Sure. " somethingsomething sex " ?
Yawn.Give them a week , and they ca n't go back to Playboy level anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XXX was invented for?Seriously.
Who searches for "sex"?
"two goats on fire, one cup"?
Sure. "somethingsomething sex"?
Yawn.Give them a week, and they can't go back to Playboy level anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238051</id>
	<title>Re:Can someone in India please try this link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244297580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because otherwise TPB would sue MS? Its a lot easier to say "we don't filter anything" on the rare occasions that someone might find something totally objectionable but a lot harder to justify "Oh we blocked this, this, this, and this because they might be illegal" because thats just inviting lawsuits. Its hard enough for Google to have adwords let alone filtering of searches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because otherwise TPB would sue MS ?
Its a lot easier to say " we do n't filter anything " on the rare occasions that someone might find something totally objectionable but a lot harder to justify " Oh we blocked this , this , this , and this because they might be illegal " because thats just inviting lawsuits .
Its hard enough for Google to have adwords let alone filtering of searches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because otherwise TPB would sue MS?
Its a lot easier to say "we don't filter anything" on the rare occasions that someone might find something totally objectionable but a lot harder to justify "Oh we blocked this, this, this, and this because they might be illegal" because thats just inviting lawsuits.
Its hard enough for Google to have adwords let alone filtering of searches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28252033</id>
	<title>Re:They're afraid that people will...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244481300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They wrote TFM.  With an emphasis on F.</p><p>Kama Sutra, anybody?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They wrote TFM .
With an emphasis on F.Kama Sutra , anybody ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wrote TFM.
With an emphasis on F.Kama Sutra, anybody?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246469</id>
	<title>Re:Google definitely has no problem with it...</title>
	<author>stdarg</author>
	<datestamp>1244389320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always wondered about those weird stats. How could more internet users (proportionally, I assume) in India be searching for sex than in the US?</p><p>It's interesting that strict religious countries dominate the results for the generic terms. When you start looking at trends for more specific fare, the list changes.</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=lesbian+asian+teens&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=1" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/trends?q=lesbian+asian+teens&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=1</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=horse+porn&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/trends?q=horse+porn&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=college+coeds&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/trends?q=college+coeds&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0</a> [google.com]</p><p>It's sad in a way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered about those weird stats .
How could more internet users ( proportionally , I assume ) in India be searching for sex than in the US ? It 's interesting that strict religious countries dominate the results for the generic terms .
When you start looking at trends for more specific fare , the list changes.http : //www.google.com/trends ? q = lesbian + asian + teens&amp;ctab = 0&amp;geo = all&amp;date = all&amp;sort = 1 [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/trends ? q = horse + porn&amp;ctab = 0&amp;geo = all&amp;date = all&amp;sort = 0 [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/trends ? q = college + coeds&amp;ctab = 0&amp;geo = all&amp;date = all&amp;sort = 0 [ google.com ] It 's sad in a way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered about those weird stats.
How could more internet users (proportionally, I assume) in India be searching for sex than in the US?It's interesting that strict religious countries dominate the results for the generic terms.
When you start looking at trends for more specific fare, the list changes.http://www.google.com/trends?q=lesbian+asian+teens&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=1 [google.com]http://www.google.com/trends?q=horse+porn&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0 [google.com]http://www.google.com/trends?q=college+coeds&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0 [google.com]It's sad in a way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238553</id>
	<title>Marketing Hoax.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244303160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I predict that within less than 10 days these restrictions will be lifted. Why? Because there's reason to believe that this is a big (rather desperate) Marketing Hoax.</p><p>Why? Because<br>a) they block countries at random,<br>b) there's no excuse,<br>c) no link to terms of service etc<br>d) they are blocking keywords at random (goatse???)</p><p>Possibly they take back these limits even gradually, to make the big crowd and their media even more excited about bing (tm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict that within less than 10 days these restrictions will be lifted .
Why ? Because there 's reason to believe that this is a big ( rather desperate ) Marketing Hoax.Why ?
Becausea ) they block countries at random,b ) there 's no excuse,c ) no link to terms of service etcd ) they are blocking keywords at random ( goatse ? ? ?
) Possibly they take back these limits even gradually , to make the big crowd and their media even more excited about bing ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict that within less than 10 days these restrictions will be lifted.
Why? Because there's reason to believe that this is a big (rather desperate) Marketing Hoax.Why?
Becausea) they block countries at random,b) there's no excuse,c) no link to terms of service etcd) they are blocking keywords at random (goatse???
)Possibly they take back these limits even gradually, to make the big crowd and their media even more excited about bing (tm).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242039</id>
	<title>Don't they have Google in India, then?</title>
	<author>Archtech</author>
	<datestamp>1244396460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why on earth would anyone use bang in India anyway? (Or anywhere else for that matter).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth would anyone use bang in India anyway ?
( Or anywhere else for that matter ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth would anyone use bang in India anyway?
(Or anywhere else for that matter).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240571</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244380320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparantly the rules for which words "may return sexually explicit content" are rather odd in general. For instance in the German version: if you try to search for "Strumpfhose" ("tights", singular) it refuses to do so.<br>However "Strumpfhosen" (plural) is perfectly okay, and bing even suggests - amongst other terms - "Frauen in Strumpfhosen" and "M&#228;nner in Strumpfhosen" (women / men in tights) as related searches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparantly the rules for which words " may return sexually explicit content " are rather odd in general .
For instance in the German version : if you try to search for " Strumpfhose " ( " tights " , singular ) it refuses to do so.However " Strumpfhosen " ( plural ) is perfectly okay , and bing even suggests - amongst other terms - " Frauen in Strumpfhosen " and " M   nner in Strumpfhosen " ( women / men in tights ) as related searches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparantly the rules for which words "may return sexually explicit content" are rather odd in general.
For instance in the German version: if you try to search for "Strumpfhose" ("tights", singular) it refuses to do so.However "Strumpfhosen" (plural) is perfectly okay, and bing even suggests - amongst other terms - "Frauen in Strumpfhosen" and "Männer in Strumpfhosen" (women / men in tights) as related searches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238303</id>
	<title>Why bing?</title>
	<author>grikdog</author>
	<datestamp>1244300280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aside from a few obvious cultural hooks (bing cherries, Bing Crosby, bing bang bong, etc.) from Advertising Psychology 101, I can't see the attraction.  To be honest, I haven't even tried it.  More net worth in Google, which is <i>my</i> librarian in the intertubes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from a few obvious cultural hooks ( bing cherries , Bing Crosby , bing bang bong , etc .
) from Advertising Psychology 101 , I ca n't see the attraction .
To be honest , I have n't even tried it .
More net worth in Google , which is my librarian in the intertubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from a few obvious cultural hooks (bing cherries, Bing Crosby, bing bang bong, etc.
) from Advertising Psychology 101, I can't see the attraction.
To be honest, I haven't even tried it.
More net worth in Google, which is my librarian in the intertubes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239047</id>
	<title>Changing countries</title>
	<author>Ernesto Alvarez</author>
	<datestamp>1244308740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In TFA (yes, I'm a heretic, I read TFA) it says that you can see how it works by changing your country to "India" in the preferences. Maybe this censorship mechanism can be avoided just by cleverly setting the preferences.</p><p>Has anyone tried in India tried to change it to something else (like, belgium)? I'd like to know if it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In TFA ( yes , I 'm a heretic , I read TFA ) it says that you can see how it works by changing your country to " India " in the preferences .
Maybe this censorship mechanism can be avoided just by cleverly setting the preferences.Has anyone tried in India tried to change it to something else ( like , belgium ) ?
I 'd like to know if it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In TFA (yes, I'm a heretic, I read TFA) it says that you can see how it works by changing your country to "India" in the preferences.
Maybe this censorship mechanism can be avoided just by cleverly setting the preferences.Has anyone tried in India tried to change it to something else (like, belgium)?
I'd like to know if it works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237781</id>
	<title>How About 'Kama Sutra' ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Rajesh says: "The INDIAN sex book"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Rajesh says : " The INDIAN sex book " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Rajesh says: "The INDIAN sex book"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238327</id>
	<title>if then</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244300640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if the internet is for porn, then what is a search engine that doesnt give you search results for porn good for?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if the internet is for porn , then what is a search engine that doesnt give you search results for porn good for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if the internet is for porn, then what is a search engine that doesnt give you search results for porn good for?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240709</id>
	<title>Re:Thank Goodness!</title>
	<author>msh104</author>
	<datestamp>1244382180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well... i have to grant you that without sex all of these things would indeed not exist..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... i have to grant you that without sex all of these things would indeed not exist.. : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... i have to grant you that without sex all of these things would indeed not exist.. :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238641</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244304120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, <b>including germany</b>:</p><p>China<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Well, in fact in China Bing doesn't return anything at all, so I guess you mean pretending to be from China. As of today it's still blocked, probably because their filters weren't good enough.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message , including germany : China ...Well , in fact in China Bing does n't return anything at all , so I guess you mean pretending to be from China .
As of today it 's still blocked , probably because their filters were n't good enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, including germany:China ...Well, in fact in China Bing doesn't return anything at all, so I guess you mean pretending to be from China.
As of today it's still blocked, probably because their filters weren't good enough.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240139</id>
	<title>Ironic</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1244372220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ironically, a search for "bing" brings up nothing but porn sites. "Horny young vixen gets a hard binging".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , a search for " bing " brings up nothing but porn sites .
" Horny young vixen gets a hard binging " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, a search for "bing" brings up nothing but porn sites.
"Horny young vixen gets a hard binging".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238071</id>
	<title>With the Kama Sutra ...</title>
	<author>bkaul</author>
	<datestamp>1244297700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... maybe Microsoft just figured it'd be redundant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... maybe Microsoft just figured it 'd be redundant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... maybe Microsoft just figured it'd be redundant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238277</id>
	<title>asdf</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244299980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you bing bing you will break the internet</p><p>(shameless IT crowd plug)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you bing bing you will break the internet ( shameless IT crowd plug )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you bing bing you will break the internet(shameless IT crowd plug)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347</id>
	<title>Any single female indian girls?</title>
	<author>DiSKiLLeR</author>
	<datestamp>1244300880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of Indian's seem to be posting here, sooo.... any single Indian females by any chance?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>(Yup, I'm gonna be modded down to hell, I just know it, but you can't blame a guy for trying !)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of Indian 's seem to be posting here , sooo.... any single Indian females by any chance ?
: ) ( Yup , I 'm gon na be modded down to hell , I just know it , but you ca n't blame a guy for trying !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of Indian's seem to be posting here, sooo.... any single Indian females by any chance?
:)(Yup, I'm gonna be modded down to hell, I just know it, but you can't blame a guy for trying !
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240021</id>
	<title>in Germany...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244370180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... blocked too (same error message but in German Language)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... blocked too ( same error message but in German Language )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... blocked too (same error message but in German Language)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big Brother knows what's best for us. Now, sit down, shut up, and consume consume consume, work work work, buy buy buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big Brother knows what 's best for us .
Now , sit down , shut up , and consume consume consume , work work work , buy buy buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big Brother knows what's best for us.
Now, sit down, shut up, and consume consume consume, work work work, buy buy buy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238357</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244301000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Big Brother knows what's best for us.</p></div><p>Don't you mean "bing" brother?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big Brother knows what 's best for us.Do n't you mean " bing " brother ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big Brother knows what's best for us.Don't you mean "bing" brother?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239449</id>
	<title>Even worse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244315520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Germany, Bing refuses to search for "Strumpfhose", which is the German word for tights/pantyhose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Germany , Bing refuses to search for " Strumpfhose " , which is the German word for tights/pantyhose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Germany, Bing refuses to search for "Strumpfhose", which is the German word for tights/pantyhose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237769</id>
	<title>how about bing?</title>
	<author>youn</author>
	<datestamp>1244295120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it could be argued that there is a song about sex, "she bings"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "she bings, she bings... I like the way she movze"... or something like that"</p><p>pardhon mye spehling,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it could be argued that there is a song about sex , " she bings " ... " she bings , she bings... I like the way she movze " ... or something like that " pardhon mye spehling,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it could be argued that there is a song about sex, "she bings" ... "she bings, she bings... I like the way she movze"... or something like that"pardhon mye spehling,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197</id>
	<title>Google definitely has no problem with it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244298900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex.'</p></div></blockquote><p>

From <a href="http://www.google.com/trends" title="google.com">google trends</a> [google.com] searching for <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=sex" title="google.com">Sex</a> [google.com]:</p><blockquote><div><p>Regions:
</p><ol>
<li> <b>India</b> </li><li>Egypt</li><li>Indonesia</li><li>Morocco</li><li>Turkey</li></ol><p>

Cities:
</p><ol>
<li> <b>Delhi, India</b> </li><li>Chennai, India</li>
<li>Jakarta, Indonesia</li><li>Mumbai, India</li><li>Rabat, Morocco</li></ol></div>
</blockquote><p>

Yeah I'd say google has absolutely no problem with people in India searching for "sex".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex .
' From google trends [ google.com ] searching for Sex [ google.com ] : Regions : India EgyptIndonesiaMoroccoTurkey Cities : Delhi , India Chennai , India Jakarta , IndonesiaMumbai , IndiaRabat , Morocco Yeah I 'd say google has absolutely no problem with people in India searching for " sex " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently Google has no problem with Indians searching for the term 'sex.
'

From google trends [google.com] searching for Sex [google.com]:Regions:

 India EgyptIndonesiaMoroccoTurkey

Cities:

 Delhi, India Chennai, India
Jakarta, IndonesiaMumbai, IndiaRabat, Morocco


Yeah I'd say google has absolutely no problem with people in India searching for "sex".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239769</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>arth1</author>
	<datestamp>1244407440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Duh. If you wanted to search for something that wasn't explicit, you wouldn't plug in the term "sex", would you?</p></div></blockquote><p>I can think of quite a few sex queries that aren't explicit:<br>"How to sex finches"<br>"sex organs in fungi"<br>"sex based discrimination"<br>"1950s sex symbols"<br>"Miranda Sex Garden"<br>"Iam sex et totidem luces"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh .
If you wanted to search for something that was n't explicit , you would n't plug in the term " sex " , would you ? I can think of quite a few sex queries that are n't explicit : " How to sex finches " " sex organs in fungi " " sex based discrimination " " 1950s sex symbols " " Miranda Sex Garden " " Iam sex et totidem luces "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh.
If you wanted to search for something that wasn't explicit, you wouldn't plug in the term "sex", would you?I can think of quite a few sex queries that aren't explicit:"How to sex finches""sex organs in fungi""sex based discrimination""1950s sex symbols""Miranda Sex Garden""Iam sex et totidem luces"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238227</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>ydrol</author>
	<datestamp>1244299320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To Paraphrase Russell Peters,</p><p>"India is the second largest population in the world. Somebody's fucking..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To Paraphrase Russell Peters , " India is the second largest population in the world .
Somebody 's fucking... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Paraphrase Russell Peters,"India is the second largest population in the world.
Somebody's fucking..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239243</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244312040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is sooo scary!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is sooo scary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is sooo scary!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28281945</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>thexile</author>
	<datestamp>1244658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Singapore as well. What a fuck up place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Singapore as well .
What a fuck up place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Singapore as well.
What a fuck up place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240901</id>
	<title>Re:who needs sex education in india</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1244385300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, but even here in the US there are plenty of idiots who know better but still get knocked up. Plenty of children being born to unfit parents, plenty of people who can't afford all the kids they've spawned because they can't keep their legs together. Education helps a little, but it's no magic cure-all for this one, unfortunately. People being forced to be personally responsible for their actions... maybe. But below a certain intelligence/awareness level, base urges override sensibility a majority of the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , but even here in the US there are plenty of idiots who know better but still get knocked up .
Plenty of children being born to unfit parents , plenty of people who ca n't afford all the kids they 've spawned because they ca n't keep their legs together .
Education helps a little , but it 's no magic cure-all for this one , unfortunately .
People being forced to be personally responsible for their actions... maybe. But below a certain intelligence/awareness level , base urges override sensibility a majority of the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, but even here in the US there are plenty of idiots who know better but still get knocked up.
Plenty of children being born to unfit parents, plenty of people who can't afford all the kids they've spawned because they can't keep their legs together.
Education helps a little, but it's no magic cure-all for this one, unfortunately.
People being forced to be personally responsible for their actions... maybe. But below a certain intelligence/awareness level, base urges override sensibility a majority of the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238701</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244304840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lookin' for love in all the wrong places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lookin ' for love in all the wrong places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lookin' for love in all the wrong places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238259</id>
	<title>Re:Tested and confirmed but...</title>
	<author>wild\_quinine</author>
	<datestamp>1244299680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However you can search for:

allah is gay
gay
nigger
make bombs
bombing building
bme pain olympics
2 girls 1 cup</p></div><p>... And since Microsoft has blocked the things it disapproves of, we can only assume that they're in favour of all of the above, especially the bottom one.</p><p>

Somebody who isn't a shit-eating, racist, lesbian, terrorist ought to sue the pants off them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However you can search for : allah is gay gay nigger make bombs bombing building bme pain olympics 2 girls 1 cup... And since Microsoft has blocked the things it disapproves of , we can only assume that they 're in favour of all of the above , especially the bottom one .
Somebody who is n't a shit-eating , racist , lesbian , terrorist ought to sue the pants off them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However you can search for:

allah is gay
gay
nigger
make bombs
bombing building
bme pain olympics
2 girls 1 cup... And since Microsoft has blocked the things it disapproves of, we can only assume that they're in favour of all of the above, especially the bottom one.
Somebody who isn't a shit-eating, racist, lesbian, terrorist ought to sue the pants off them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240519</id>
	<title>Bing Germany also blocks certain search terms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244379360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You cannot search for the German word of "pantyhose" (Strumpfhose).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can not search for the German word of " pantyhose " ( Strumpfhose ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You cannot search for the German word of "pantyhose" (Strumpfhose).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239273</id>
	<title>Re:Pointing out the obvious...</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1244312640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me equally obviously point out the fact that the Kama Sutra is not what you think it is.   Please stop this blatant misrepresentation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me equally obviously point out the fact that the Kama Sutra is not what you think it is .
Please stop this blatant misrepresentation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me equally obviously point out the fact that the Kama Sutra is not what you think it is.
Please stop this blatant misrepresentation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237809</id>
	<title>Re:Can someone in India please try this link</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1244295540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It works on the India site and even comes up in the search suggestions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It works on the India site and even comes up in the search suggestions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works on the India site and even comes up in the search suggestions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238269</id>
	<title>Re:Tested and confirmed but...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1244299860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However you can search for:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...2 girls 1 cup</p></div><p>Who needs sex when you have 2 chicks 1 cup?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However you can search for : ...2 girls 1 cupWho needs sex when you have 2 chicks 1 cup ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However you can search for: ...2 girls 1 cupWho needs sex when you have 2 chicks 1 cup?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240335</id>
	<title>Re:Any single female indian girls?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244376300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot just became an Indian singles site.</p><p>Now we know Slashdot has jumped the shark.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot just became an Indian singles site.Now we know Slashdot has jumped the shark .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot just became an Indian singles site.Now we know Slashdot has jumped the shark.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246619</id>
	<title>Re:In all fairness to Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244390880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Talking about sex in public is a taboo in India.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Talking about sex in public is a taboo in India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talking about sex in public is a taboo in India.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237863</id>
	<title>Re:Thank Goodness!</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1244295960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately, the general population is actually that stupid.  Please be less subtle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , the general population is actually that stupid .
Please be less subtle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, the general population is actually that stupid.
Please be less subtle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238669</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1244304360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's sechs... of "Gruppe Sechs" GTAIII securicar fame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sechs... of " Gruppe Sechs " GTAIII securicar fame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sechs... of "Gruppe Sechs" GTAIII securicar fame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237819</id>
	<title>The ironing is delicious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kind of ironic, since India is the home of the Kama Sutra and all. . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of ironic , since India is the home of the Kama Sutra and all .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of ironic, since India is the home of the Kama Sutra and all.
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28243503</id>
	<title>Microsoft and authority</title>
	<author>kabloom</author>
	<datestamp>1244407260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft's strategy lately has been to create a product, with the expectation that it will succeed big, but undermine it by using their product as a way to enforce the will of some authority (rightly or not) against the consumer's will.</p><p>Remember the Zune and "Music the way it wants to be", which would enforce DRM on even freely downloaded songs when sharing them with other users? They never did figure out that "music the way you want it to be" would be a better selling point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's strategy lately has been to create a product , with the expectation that it will succeed big , but undermine it by using their product as a way to enforce the will of some authority ( rightly or not ) against the consumer 's will.Remember the Zune and " Music the way it wants to be " , which would enforce DRM on even freely downloaded songs when sharing them with other users ?
They never did figure out that " music the way you want it to be " would be a better selling point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's strategy lately has been to create a product, with the expectation that it will succeed big, but undermine it by using their product as a way to enforce the will of some authority (rightly or not) against the consumer's will.Remember the Zune and "Music the way it wants to be", which would enforce DRM on even freely downloaded songs when sharing them with other users?
They never did figure out that "music the way you want it to be" would be a better selling point.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28249209</id>
	<title>Horse, bolt and stable door?</title>
	<author>ColonelClaw</author>
	<datestamp>1244464020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With a population of 1.15 billion and rising, I'm guessing Indians may know a thing or two about sex already</htmltext>
<tokenext>With a population of 1.15 billion and rising , I 'm guessing Indians may know a thing or two about sex already</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With a population of 1.15 billion and rising, I'm guessing Indians may know a thing or two about sex already</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237659</id>
	<title>Hm.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now what are all their tech support guys gonna do all day?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now what are all their tech support guys gon na do all day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now what are all their tech support guys gonna do all day?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238481</id>
	<title>Re:Tested and confirmed but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244302200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and now you're on every FBI, CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security watchlist all in one go. Congrats! Have fun in Guantanamo...</p><p>Ugh, I hate this place... Too bad we don't have that constitution thing to protect us anymore...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and now you 're on every FBI , CIA , NSA , and Homeland Security watchlist all in one go .
Congrats ! Have fun in Guantanamo...Ugh , I hate this place... Too bad we do n't have that constitution thing to protect us anymore.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and now you're on every FBI, CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security watchlist all in one go.
Congrats! Have fun in Guantanamo...Ugh, I hate this place... Too bad we don't have that constitution thing to protect us anymore...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025</id>
	<title>Re:In all fairness to Microsoft</title>
	<author>Sc4Freak</author>
	<datestamp>1244297340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't a government demand, but Microsoft voluntarily banned these search terms in order to comply with local laws in various countries.</p><p>An article on <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/06/bing-blocks-sexual-content-in-20-percent-of-regions.ars" title="arstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">Ars Technica</a> [arstechnica.com] found that 20\% of regions had sexual content blocked.</p><p>The article states, "Microsoft says it determined this list of regions by looking at their local laws. The company is not taking action in response to specific government demands or regulations; it is simply playing it safe."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't a government demand , but Microsoft voluntarily banned these search terms in order to comply with local laws in various countries.An article on Ars Technica [ arstechnica.com ] found that 20 \ % of regions had sexual content blocked.The article states , " Microsoft says it determined this list of regions by looking at their local laws .
The company is not taking action in response to specific government demands or regulations ; it is simply playing it safe .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't a government demand, but Microsoft voluntarily banned these search terms in order to comply with local laws in various countries.An article on Ars Technica [arstechnica.com] found that 20\% of regions had sexual content blocked.The article states, "Microsoft says it determined this list of regions by looking at their local laws.
The company is not taking action in response to specific government demands or regulations; it is simply playing it safe.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239159</id>
	<title>Albert</title>
	<author>AlbertF</author>
	<datestamp>1244310660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a reason as to why Bing does such actions, and it is probably due to pornography being illegal in India and it not wanting to make any cases on it while Bing is still new.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a reason as to why Bing does such actions , and it is probably due to pornography being illegal in India and it not wanting to make any cases on it while Bing is still new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a reason as to why Bing does such actions, and it is probably due to pornography being illegal in India and it not wanting to make any cases on it while Bing is still new.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240431</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244377980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there is a large but growing Muslim population there in Germany.</p><p>A lot of the Sharia Laws like to get pushed around by these religious idiots, but unfortunately everyone feels bad for the Muslims these days and nobody wants to call them out on their problems of intollerance.</p><p>Also I don't think MS has anything to do with this and rather it is the Indian government, Googles servers are probably just not located in their borders maybe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there is a large but growing Muslim population there in Germany.A lot of the Sharia Laws like to get pushed around by these religious idiots , but unfortunately everyone feels bad for the Muslims these days and nobody wants to call them out on their problems of intollerance.Also I do n't think MS has anything to do with this and rather it is the Indian government , Googles servers are probably just not located in their borders maybe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there is a large but growing Muslim population there in Germany.A lot of the Sharia Laws like to get pushed around by these religious idiots, but unfortunately everyone feels bad for the Muslims these days and nobody wants to call them out on their problems of intollerance.Also I don't think MS has anything to do with this and rather it is the Indian government, Googles servers are probably just not located in their borders maybe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239429</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244315220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Bing Bang!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Bing Bang !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Bing Bang!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237839</id>
	<title>In all fairness to Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Indian government might have demanded it.. stranger things have happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Indian government might have demanded it.. stranger things have happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Indian government might have demanded it.. stranger things have happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239077</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1244309580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thailand? Sex is so under wraps there.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thailand ?
Sex is so under wraps there.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thailand?
Sex is so under wraps there.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238091</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously</title>
	<author>Looce</author>
	<datestamp>1244297940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>China has a very oppressive government; India doesn't, as far as I know. It would be interesting to see whether Bing works <b>at all</b> in China... or if it's "restricted" in China like Google Search is.</p><p>However, compare <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet\_censorship\_in\_the\_People's\_Republic\_of\_China&amp;oldid=294813953#Enforcement" title="wikipedia.org">Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China</a> [wikipedia.org] (<i>"new regulations to be enforced by the ministry that inflict fines for 'defaming government agencies,' 'splitting the nation,' and leaking "state secrets.""</i>)</p><p>and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Censorship\_in\_India&amp;oldid=289636477#Obscenity\_law" title="wikipedia.org">Censorship in India</a> [wikipedia.org], which is also applied to the Internet (<i>"Some media dealing with sex are frequently banned. Films, television shows and music videos are especially prone, however if any literature is banned, it is not usually for pornographic reasons."</i>)</p><p>It would also be interesting to know whether Microsoft blocked 'sex' on Bing/India by request. or of its own volition to prevent <i>possible</i> repercussions. The law is enforced more heavily in China than in India, that's for sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>China has a very oppressive government ; India does n't , as far as I know .
It would be interesting to see whether Bing works at all in China... or if it 's " restricted " in China like Google Search is.However , compare Internet censorship in the People 's Republic of China [ wikipedia.org ] ( " new regulations to be enforced by the ministry that inflict fines for 'defaming government agencies, ' 'splitting the nation, ' and leaking " state secrets .
" " ) and Censorship in India [ wikipedia.org ] , which is also applied to the Internet ( " Some media dealing with sex are frequently banned .
Films , television shows and music videos are especially prone , however if any literature is banned , it is not usually for pornographic reasons .
" ) It would also be interesting to know whether Microsoft blocked 'sex ' on Bing/India by request .
or of its own volition to prevent possible repercussions .
The law is enforced more heavily in China than in India , that 's for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China has a very oppressive government; India doesn't, as far as I know.
It would be interesting to see whether Bing works at all in China... or if it's "restricted" in China like Google Search is.However, compare Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China [wikipedia.org] ("new regulations to be enforced by the ministry that inflict fines for 'defaming government agencies,' 'splitting the nation,' and leaking "state secrets.
"")and Censorship in India [wikipedia.org], which is also applied to the Internet ("Some media dealing with sex are frequently banned.
Films, television shows and music videos are especially prone, however if any literature is banned, it is not usually for pornographic reasons.
")It would also be interesting to know whether Microsoft blocked 'sex' on Bing/India by request.
or of its own volition to prevent possible repercussions.
The law is enforced more heavily in China than in India, that's for sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240145</id>
	<title>Maybe they don't have enough population yet?</title>
	<author>Seth Kriticos</author>
	<datestamp>1244372520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If people could actually acquire porn and jack of at home, they would fuck much less. This way they can't satisfy them self with jerking of the net porn and have to fuck everything with 2 legs. I derive, that they plan on taking over the world by sheer number.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If people could actually acquire porn and jack of at home , they would fuck much less .
This way they ca n't satisfy them self with jerking of the net porn and have to fuck everything with 2 legs .
I derive , that they plan on taking over the world by sheer number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If people could actually acquire porn and jack of at home, they would fuck much less.
This way they can't satisfy them self with jerking of the net porn and have to fuck everything with 2 legs.
I derive, that they plan on taking over the world by sheer number.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779</id>
	<title>Tested and confirmed but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It does stop you form searching for sex. Guess what, goatse gives the same result too! However you can search for:
<br> <br>
allah is gay<br>
gay<br>
nigger<br>
make bombs<br>
bombing building<br>
bme pain olympics<br>
2 girls 1 cup</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does stop you form searching for sex .
Guess what , goatse gives the same result too !
However you can search for : allah is gay gay nigger make bombs bombing building bme pain olympics 2 girls 1 cup</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does stop you form searching for sex.
Guess what, goatse gives the same result too!
However you can search for:
 
allah is gay
gay
nigger
make bombs
bombing building
bme pain olympics
2 girls 1 cup</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</id>
	<title>Duh.</title>
	<author>orngjce223</author>
	<datestamp>1244294220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A search for "sex" would return sexually explicit content?  Duh.  If you wanted to search for something that wasn't explicit, you wouldn't plug in the term "sex", would you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A search for " sex " would return sexually explicit content ?
Duh. If you wanted to search for something that was n't explicit , you would n't plug in the term " sex " , would you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A search for "sex" would return sexually explicit content?
Duh.  If you wanted to search for something that wasn't explicit, you wouldn't plug in the term "sex", would you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28249013</id>
	<title>Re:Google definitely has no problem with it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Incidentally, Delhi is the Indian capitol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Incidentally , Delhi is the Indian capitol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incidentally, Delhi is the Indian capitol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239911</id>
	<title>Re:Traditional newspapers</title>
	<author>blackest\_k</author>
	<datestamp>1244367780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is Google, most people would say a search engine but is it?<br>Googles income comes from providing links to adverts that relate to a particular search provided of course people searching with Google click on the ads.</p><p>If a particular search results in you clicking on to a search result rather than an advert google hasn't earned anything. Some of these ads cost a sizable amount for that click.</p><p>If you wanted to improve google as a search engine then making it easy to filter out particular sites could dramatically improve the front page results. Also to limit the area's in which search results come from is another obvious choice. For example if your looking for a restaurant you might want to limit your search to restaurants within say 20 miles of your location.</p><p>user preferences should be able to hold a list of unwanted sites, ebay and wikipedia seem obvious choices along with sites which seem to think when you look for one thing that you want another thing instead.</p><p>Some of these things like searching for stuff within a geographical location might sound hard to implement but google allows advertisers to target ads to city level.</p><p>So really when you search with google <b>you</b> are the product google is selling to its advertisers.</p><p>Google may be best for search but its not as good as it could be, unfortunately becoming a better search engine could be detrimental to their bottom line as less ads get clicked.</p><p>This pretty much goes for any search engine not just google but if your competing with google, localising search and allowing users to filter out sites and types of sites would give an edge over google. Perhaps there would need to be a why search option (looking to buy something would filter different results compared to say technical information)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is Google , most people would say a search engine but is it ? Googles income comes from providing links to adverts that relate to a particular search provided of course people searching with Google click on the ads.If a particular search results in you clicking on to a search result rather than an advert google has n't earned anything .
Some of these ads cost a sizable amount for that click.If you wanted to improve google as a search engine then making it easy to filter out particular sites could dramatically improve the front page results .
Also to limit the area 's in which search results come from is another obvious choice .
For example if your looking for a restaurant you might want to limit your search to restaurants within say 20 miles of your location.user preferences should be able to hold a list of unwanted sites , ebay and wikipedia seem obvious choices along with sites which seem to think when you look for one thing that you want another thing instead.Some of these things like searching for stuff within a geographical location might sound hard to implement but google allows advertisers to target ads to city level.So really when you search with google you are the product google is selling to its advertisers.Google may be best for search but its not as good as it could be , unfortunately becoming a better search engine could be detrimental to their bottom line as less ads get clicked.This pretty much goes for any search engine not just google but if your competing with google , localising search and allowing users to filter out sites and types of sites would give an edge over google .
Perhaps there would need to be a why search option ( looking to buy something would filter different results compared to say technical information )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is Google, most people would say a search engine but is it?Googles income comes from providing links to adverts that relate to a particular search provided of course people searching with Google click on the ads.If a particular search results in you clicking on to a search result rather than an advert google hasn't earned anything.
Some of these ads cost a sizable amount for that click.If you wanted to improve google as a search engine then making it easy to filter out particular sites could dramatically improve the front page results.
Also to limit the area's in which search results come from is another obvious choice.
For example if your looking for a restaurant you might want to limit your search to restaurants within say 20 miles of your location.user preferences should be able to hold a list of unwanted sites, ebay and wikipedia seem obvious choices along with sites which seem to think when you look for one thing that you want another thing instead.Some of these things like searching for stuff within a geographical location might sound hard to implement but google allows advertisers to target ads to city level.So really when you search with google you are the product google is selling to its advertisers.Google may be best for search but its not as good as it could be, unfortunately becoming a better search engine could be detrimental to their bottom line as less ads get clicked.This pretty much goes for any search engine not just google but if your competing with google, localising search and allowing users to filter out sites and types of sites would give an edge over google.
Perhaps there would need to be a why search option (looking to buy something would filter different results compared to say technical information)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238727</id>
	<title>Re:Foot, meet gun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244305020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India, once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice.</p></div><p>Dunno, the Indians do seem to <a href="http://google.com/trends?q=sex" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">search for it</a> [google.com] a lot.</p><p>India Ranked number 1 for searching for "sex".<br>Top 10 cities searching for "sex" include: 1 Delhi, 2 Chennai, 4 Mumbai</p><p>India Ranked number 7 <a href="http://google.com/trends?q=porn" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">searching for</a> [google.com] "porn" (Way to go Ireland Number 1!). With Delhi at number 6.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India , once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice.Dunno , the Indians do seem to search for it [ google.com ] a lot.India Ranked number 1 for searching for " sex " .Top 10 cities searching for " sex " include : 1 Delhi , 2 Chennai , 4 MumbaiIndia Ranked number 7 searching for [ google.com ] " porn " ( Way to go Ireland Number 1 ! ) .
With Delhi at number 6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India, once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice.Dunno, the Indians do seem to search for it [google.com] a lot.India Ranked number 1 for searching for "sex".Top 10 cities searching for "sex" include: 1 Delhi, 2 Chennai, 4 MumbaiIndia Ranked number 7 searching for [google.com] "porn" (Way to go Ireland Number 1!).
With Delhi at number 6.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053</id>
	<title>Re:Foot, meet gun</title>
	<author>networkzombie</author>
	<datestamp>1244297580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India, once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India , once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to the religious nature of the vast majority of peoples in India, once they hear that it blocks offensive content it may become the search engine of choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238131</id>
	<title>Population Control</title>
	<author>CougMerrik</author>
	<datestamp>1244298240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's how many people in India?  Over a billion?  Maybe it should just redirect to "Did you mean to search for <b>Birth Control</b>?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's how many people in India ?
Over a billion ?
Maybe it should just redirect to " Did you mean to search for Birth Control ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's how many people in India?
Over a billion?
Maybe it should just redirect to "Did you mean to search for Birth Control?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237867</id>
	<title>Traditional newspapers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244296020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just last week reps from many dead-tree newspaper publishing companies in America got together at a conference to explore ways they could remain profitable in the face of blogs and other online news sources.  The conclusions and statements they agreed on in the end prove out this fact: they are no longer interested in "journalism" (investigative reporting is almost completely dead).  No, their main goal is 30\% profit margins to ensure "shareholder value".</p><p>I suggest that the big search engines - all of them, you know who they are - are also intereted in maximizing profits, not providing "quality search results".  That's why MS is censoring searches for "sex" in India, Google caved into the demands of the Chinese government a year ago (or more), possibly they all restrict searching for "Nazi" or "Hitler" in Europe.</p><p>They have to be politically the equivalent of non-offensive and milquetoast, or risk the loss of revenue and profits.</p><p>There's nothing inherently wrong or evil with those policies.  I think it's important to realize what's going on, however, and the last thing these companies will ever do is admit to the truth.  The truth goes against what they claim as their mission.  At least with Microsoft, everyone on the face of the planet who deals with computers or programming to make a living knows they're a great big lying sack of shit.  The masses do not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just last week reps from many dead-tree newspaper publishing companies in America got together at a conference to explore ways they could remain profitable in the face of blogs and other online news sources .
The conclusions and statements they agreed on in the end prove out this fact : they are no longer interested in " journalism " ( investigative reporting is almost completely dead ) .
No , their main goal is 30 \ % profit margins to ensure " shareholder value " .I suggest that the big search engines - all of them , you know who they are - are also intereted in maximizing profits , not providing " quality search results " .
That 's why MS is censoring searches for " sex " in India , Google caved into the demands of the Chinese government a year ago ( or more ) , possibly they all restrict searching for " Nazi " or " Hitler " in Europe.They have to be politically the equivalent of non-offensive and milquetoast , or risk the loss of revenue and profits.There 's nothing inherently wrong or evil with those policies .
I think it 's important to realize what 's going on , however , and the last thing these companies will ever do is admit to the truth .
The truth goes against what they claim as their mission .
At least with Microsoft , everyone on the face of the planet who deals with computers or programming to make a living knows they 're a great big lying sack of shit .
The masses do not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just last week reps from many dead-tree newspaper publishing companies in America got together at a conference to explore ways they could remain profitable in the face of blogs and other online news sources.
The conclusions and statements they agreed on in the end prove out this fact: they are no longer interested in "journalism" (investigative reporting is almost completely dead).
No, their main goal is 30\% profit margins to ensure "shareholder value".I suggest that the big search engines - all of them, you know who they are - are also intereted in maximizing profits, not providing "quality search results".
That's why MS is censoring searches for "sex" in India, Google caved into the demands of the Chinese government a year ago (or more), possibly they all restrict searching for "Nazi" or "Hitler" in Europe.They have to be politically the equivalent of non-offensive and milquetoast, or risk the loss of revenue and profits.There's nothing inherently wrong or evil with those policies.
I think it's important to realize what's going on, however, and the last thing these companies will ever do is admit to the truth.
The truth goes against what they claim as their mission.
At least with Microsoft, everyone on the face of the planet who deals with computers or programming to make a living knows they're a great big lying sack of shit.
The masses do not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239725</id>
	<title>this is MS's idea of a competitive edge:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244406660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.<br>Google for "General Audiences."</p><p>F**k Bill Gates. Google that.<br>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.Google for " General Audiences .
" F * * k Bill Gates .
Google that. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.Google for "General Audiences.
"F**k Bill Gates.
Google that..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238179</id>
	<title>What about...</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1244298720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"sexually transmitted diseases"?<br>"sexual abuse support groups"?<br>"sexual harassment statistics"?<br>"sex discrimination"?<br>"sex education"?<br>"safe sex"?</p><p>All blocked?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" sexually transmitted diseases " ?
" sexual abuse support groups " ?
" sexual harassment statistics " ?
" sex discrimination " ?
" sex education " ?
" safe sex " ? All blocked ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"sexually transmitted diseases"?
"sexual abuse support groups"?
"sexual harassment statistics"?
"sex discrimination"?
"sex education"?
"safe sex"?All blocked?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238325</id>
	<title>Hasnt the time come yet ?</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1244300580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>considering all the flops they have made in the last 3 years, when will it be politically correct to rename them moronsoft ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>considering all the flops they have made in the last 3 years , when will it be politically correct to rename them moronsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>considering all the flops they have made in the last 3 years, when will it be politically correct to rename them moronsoft ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242095</id>
	<title>Re:Any single female indian girls?</title>
	<author>superdana</author>
	<datestamp>1244396820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>you can't blame a guy for trying !</i> <br>
<br>
Yes you can.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you ca n't blame a guy for trying !
Yes you can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can't blame a guy for trying !
Yes you can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239111</id>
	<title>sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244310120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; If you try to search for the term 'sex,' along with lots of variations,<br>&gt; from India using Microsoft's new search engine, an error message<br>&gt; is returned...</p><p>It's comforting to know the standards police are cutting straight to the point and prioritizing the most important functionality first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; If you try to search for the term 'sex, ' along with lots of variations , &gt; from India using Microsoft 's new search engine , an error message &gt; is returned...It 's comforting to know the standards police are cutting straight to the point and prioritizing the most important functionality first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; If you try to search for the term 'sex,' along with lots of variations,&gt; from India using Microsoft's new search engine, an error message&gt; is returned...It's comforting to know the standards police are cutting straight to the point and prioritizing the most important functionality first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238109</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>IRWolfie-</author>
	<datestamp>1244298060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is deliberate discrimination against sextons everywhere!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is deliberate discrimination against sextons everywhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is deliberate discrimination against sextons everywhere!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238507</id>
	<title>Very interesting.</title>
	<author>drolli</author>
	<datestamp>1244302560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they don't like explicit content, then should filter the content, not the searches. I think it is possible to return informative web pages about sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do n't like explicit content , then should filter the content , not the searches .
I think it is possible to return informative web pages about sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they don't like explicit content, then should filter the content, not the searches.
I think it is possible to return informative web pages about sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238809</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>orangeplanet64</author>
	<datestamp>1244305800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, including germany:

China
Hong Kong
Indonesia</p></div><p>what message?.. i'm searching sex with the bing.com from indonesia, and it returned results. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">wikipedia page</a> [wikipedia.org] is the first result.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message , including germany : China Hong Kong Indonesiawhat message ? . .
i 'm searching sex with the bing.com from indonesia , and it returned results .
wikipedia page [ wikipedia.org ] is the first result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, including germany:

China
Hong Kong
Indonesiawhat message?..
i'm searching sex with the bing.com from indonesia, and it returned results.
wikipedia page [wikipedia.org] is the first result.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238349</id>
	<title>irrelevant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244300880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bing is irrelevant, microsoft is irrelevant, google is irrelevant.  we are all going to die soon, the end is upon us!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bing is irrelevant , microsoft is irrelevant , google is irrelevant .
we are all going to die soon , the end is upon us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bing is irrelevant, microsoft is irrelevant, google is irrelevant.
we are all going to die soon, the end is upon us!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238265</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1244299740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No!  If people from India can't search for sex, they might not know how to do it!  Think of what that would do to their population!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No !
If people from India ca n't search for sex , they might not know how to do it !
Think of what that would do to their population !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No!
If people from India can't search for sex, they might not know how to do it!
Think of what that would do to their population!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28248121</id>
	<title>Good ...</title>
	<author>KingBenny</author>
	<datestamp>1244494680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>and with these words, Bing was moved to the realm of wannabings and the extinct</htmltext>
<tokenext>and with these words , Bing was moved to the realm of wannabings and the extinct</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and with these words, Bing was moved to the realm of wannabings and the extinct</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238909</id>
	<title>Re:Foot, meet gun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244307120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kind of an invalid statement, most people in India are Hindu, Buddhist, or Sikh, not conservative Christians. Ever heard of the Kama Sutra, tantra, or my personal favorite,  Bhang?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of an invalid statement , most people in India are Hindu , Buddhist , or Sikh , not conservative Christians .
Ever heard of the Kama Sutra , tantra , or my personal favorite , Bhang ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of an invalid statement, most people in India are Hindu, Buddhist, or Sikh, not conservative Christians.
Ever heard of the Kama Sutra, tantra, or my personal favorite,  Bhang?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721</id>
	<title>Thank Goodness!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone cares about morals and propriety. The internet is no place for sex, especially Indian sex. If I was in charge no-one would be allowed to have sex or talk about sex or read about sex because sex is dirty and immoral and leads to crime, drug use, malfeasance, insouciance, laziness, ugliness, and general badness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone cares about morals and propriety .
The internet is no place for sex , especially Indian sex .
If I was in charge no-one would be allowed to have sex or talk about sex or read about sex because sex is dirty and immoral and leads to crime , drug use , malfeasance , insouciance , laziness , ugliness , and general badness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone cares about morals and propriety.
The internet is no place for sex, especially Indian sex.
If I was in charge no-one would be allowed to have sex or talk about sex or read about sex because sex is dirty and immoral and leads to crime, drug use, malfeasance, insouciance, laziness, ugliness, and general badness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237815</id>
	<title>Bling is banned</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1244295600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By several providers of 'content filter devices'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By several providers of 'content filter devices' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By several providers of 'content filter devices'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242443</id>
	<title>I don't know why, but this made me think:</title>
	<author>Tokerat</author>
	<datestamp>1244399340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft Bing: 60\% of the time, it works every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Bing : 60 \ % of the time , it works every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Bing: 60\% of the time, it works every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238011</id>
	<title>Another Microsoft foolish move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244297220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there is no sex in India, why are there so many people?

<br> <br>Is Bing the Zune of search services?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there is no sex in India , why are there so many people ?
Is Bing the Zune of search services ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there is no sex in India, why are there so many people?
Is Bing the Zune of search services?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237975</id>
	<title>And Bing is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244296800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...dead on arrival.
<br> <br>
Really, does Microsoft completely miss the point of search engines? I mean, I know they missed the point of operating systems and web browsers, but this is ridiculous. You spend millions on advertising, and then blow a good portion of your target market (Indians searching for sex and geeks who will object to this blatant censorship) right off the bat.
<br> <br>
I will never cease to be amazed by this company.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...dead on arrival .
Really , does Microsoft completely miss the point of search engines ?
I mean , I know they missed the point of operating systems and web browsers , but this is ridiculous .
You spend millions on advertising , and then blow a good portion of your target market ( Indians searching for sex and geeks who will object to this blatant censorship ) right off the bat .
I will never cease to be amazed by this company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...dead on arrival.
Really, does Microsoft completely miss the point of search engines?
I mean, I know they missed the point of operating systems and web browsers, but this is ridiculous.
You spend millions on advertising, and then blow a good portion of your target market (Indians searching for sex and geeks who will object to this blatant censorship) right off the bat.
I will never cease to be amazed by this company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28248973</id>
	<title>Re:Population Control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think allowing half a billion men to jerk off to pr0n would be a form of birth control.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think allowing half a billion men to jerk off to pr0n would be a form of birth control .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think allowing half a billion men to jerk off to pr0n would be a form of birth control.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239245</id>
	<title>Outsourcing</title>
	<author>Joebert</author>
	<datestamp>1244312040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well duhh. Microsoft's moving their workforce to India.<br> <br>

Microsoft learned their lesson with American employees browsing porn at work all day, they're just nipping the problem in the bud over in India.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well duhh .
Microsoft 's moving their workforce to India .
Microsoft learned their lesson with American employees browsing porn at work all day , they 're just nipping the problem in the bud over in India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well duhh.
Microsoft's moving their workforce to India.
Microsoft learned their lesson with American employees browsing porn at work all day, they're just nipping the problem in the bud over in India.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238183</id>
	<title>Happens in Thailand</title>
	<author>nisboy</author>
	<datestamp>1244298720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same thing happens when you search from within Thailand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same thing happens when you search from within Thailand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same thing happens when you search from within Thailand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237985</id>
	<title>Re:So search for sex,the natural way</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244296920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waitasec... porn stars have names?</p><p>While we're at it... porn stars have faces?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waitasec... porn stars have names ? While we 're at it... porn stars have faces ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waitasec... porn stars have names?While we're at it... porn stars have faces?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239017</id>
	<title>Is this a strategy</title>
	<author>jpate</author>
	<datestamp>1244308500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to make bing the "google that's safe for kids"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>to make bing the " google that 's safe for kids " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to make bing the "google that's safe for kids"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238763</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>guyminuslife</author>
	<datestamp>1244305440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I'm unfamiliar with the concept, and would like to find out what it's all about. I was looking for the Wikipedia page.</p><p>I have recently become interested in producing flying robots, and since I'm aware that sex has to do with birds and bees, I assume that it has to do with aerodynamics. This would be most useful for my robots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I 'm unfamiliar with the concept , and would like to find out what it 's all about .
I was looking for the Wikipedia page.I have recently become interested in producing flying robots , and since I 'm aware that sex has to do with birds and bees , I assume that it has to do with aerodynamics .
This would be most useful for my robots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I'm unfamiliar with the concept, and would like to find out what it's all about.
I was looking for the Wikipedia page.I have recently become interested in producing flying robots, and since I'm aware that sex has to do with birds and bees, I assume that it has to do with aerodynamics.
This would be most useful for my robots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239707</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244406420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not just India they have restored this to , includes almost whole of Asia , and so called countries that honour traditional values</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not just India they have restored this to , includes almost whole of Asia , and so called countries that honour traditional values</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not just India they have restored this to , includes almost whole of Asia , and so called countries that honour traditional values</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237661</id>
	<title>'sex may return sexually explicit content'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No shit, Sherlock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No shit , Sherlock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shit, Sherlock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238293</id>
	<title>They're afraid that people will...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244300160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>RTFM. With the emphasis on the F.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFM .
With the emphasis on the F .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFM.
With the emphasis on the F.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237685</id>
	<title>So search for sex,the natural way</title>
	<author>Gi0</author>
	<datestamp>1244294340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&#206;'m i the only one who's searching for pron starts with the actual names of the pron stars?:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>  'm i the only one who 's searching for pron starts with the actual names of the pron stars ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Î'm i the only one who's searching for pron starts with the actual names of the pron stars?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240075</id>
	<title>it is obvious</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1244371080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If their population, and the Kama Sutra, are any indication, the cat is definitely out of the bag! Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me...</p></div><p>Well, they heard about how Apple had banned that app with the Kama Sutra on the iphone.  So Microsoft, as usual, is just copying Apple once again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If their population , and the Kama Sutra , are any indication , the cat is definitely out of the bag !
Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me...Well , they heard about how Apple had banned that app with the Kama Sutra on the iphone .
So Microsoft , as usual , is just copying Apple once again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If their population, and the Kama Sutra, are any indication, the cat is definitely out of the bag!
Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me...Well, they heard about how Apple had banned that app with the Kama Sutra on the iphone.
So Microsoft, as usual, is just copying Apple once again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239921</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244367900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reasoning behind the choice of blocked words in Germany escapes me, if there is any.<br>For example: searching for "Strumpfhose" gives the above warning about sex sites, too.<br>However, searching for the english translation "pantyhose" works just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reasoning behind the choice of blocked words in Germany escapes me , if there is any.For example : searching for " Strumpfhose " gives the above warning about sex sites , too.However , searching for the english translation " pantyhose " works just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reasoning behind the choice of blocked words in Germany escapes me, if there is any.For example: searching for "Strumpfhose" gives the above warning about sex sites, too.However, searching for the english translation "pantyhose" works just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28251781</id>
	<title>Seriously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do Indians really NEED to search for 'sex'?  One would think with such a large population...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do Indians really NEED to search for 'sex ' ?
One would think with such a large population.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do Indians really NEED to search for 'sex'?
One would think with such a large population...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240587</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Blankw</author>
	<datestamp>1244380440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Is that you Mr Prime Minister?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Is that you Mr Prime Minister ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Is that you Mr Prime Minister?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240869</id>
	<title>I know why now:</title>
	<author>vchoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244384760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No 'karma' for 'sutra'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No 'karma ' for 'sutra'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No 'karma' for 'sutra'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240189</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244373480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>... there is no sex in India's champagne room.</i> </p><p>Or maybe the government, seeing a population of 1.17 billion (July, '09 estimate) just figured that people in India knew quite all they needed to know about sex.</p><p>Hmmm, captcha = strategy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... there is no sex in India 's champagne room .
Or maybe the government , seeing a population of 1.17 billion ( July , '09 estimate ) just figured that people in India knew quite all they needed to know about sex.Hmmm , captcha = strategy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... there is no sex in India's champagne room.
Or maybe the government, seeing a population of 1.17 billion (July, '09 estimate) just figured that people in India knew quite all they needed to know about sex.Hmmm, captcha = strategy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240265</id>
	<title>Re:Any single female indian girls?</title>
	<author>chrisarn</author>
	<datestamp>1244375160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Haha, you are quite right girls are like domain names:

All the good ones are taken, but you can always find one in a foreign country...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha , you are quite right girls are like domain names : All the good ones are taken , but you can always find one in a foreign country.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha, you are quite right girls are like domain names:

All the good ones are taken, but you can always find one in a foreign country...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241195</id>
	<title>to comply with local laws</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1244388600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So indirectly the indian government did demand it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So indirectly the indian government did demand it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So indirectly the indian government did demand it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238551</id>
	<title>Misspelling gets around it</title>
	<author>Nakor BlueRider</author>
	<datestamp>1244303160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did a search for:</p><p>se x</p><p>And got all the results for 'sex'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did a search for : se xAnd got all the results for 'sex'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did a search for:se xAnd got all the results for 'sex'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238017</id>
	<title>What happens if you type "zzzz"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244297280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does "zzzz" get you sex?
</p><p> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1998/09/21/business/compressed-data-microsoft-word-as-pundit-software-maker-says-it-isn-t-so.html" title="nytimes.com">Microsoft</a> [nytimes.com] <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3683" title="linuxjournal.com">Spell Check</a> [linuxjournal.com] <a href="http://www.eeggs.com/items/1730.html" title="eeggs.com">Easter Eggs.</a> [eeggs.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does " zzzz " get you sex ?
Microsoft [ nytimes.com ] Spell Check [ linuxjournal.com ] Easter Eggs .
[ eeggs.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does "zzzz" get you sex?
Microsoft [nytimes.com] Spell Check [linuxjournal.com] Easter Eggs.
[eeggs.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238165</id>
	<title>I guess it's taboo..but..</title>
	<author>grasshoppa</author>
	<datestamp>1244298540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have we considered that the Indian government forced this requirement on MS?  MS isn't exactly known for sticking to their morals..on pretty much anyway, so why do we automatically assume it's their fault?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have we considered that the Indian government forced this requirement on MS ?
MS is n't exactly known for sticking to their morals..on pretty much anyway , so why do we automatically assume it 's their fault ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have we considered that the Indian government forced this requirement on MS?
MS isn't exactly known for sticking to their morals..on pretty much anyway, so why do we automatically assume it's their fault?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239031</id>
	<title>On the plus side</title>
	<author>Com2Kid</author>
	<datestamp>1244308620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the US, their video search does pr0n a lot better than Google's does..</p><p>You win some you lose some.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the US , their video search does pr0n a lot better than Google 's does..You win some you lose some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the US, their video search does pr0n a lot better than Google's does..You win some you lose some.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238189</id>
	<title>Perhaps this is part of their push for acceptance</title>
	<author>PotatoHead</author>
	<datestamp>1244298840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they sign on with all the entities that people don't like and don't trust.</p><p>Governments, big media, big corporate, you name it.</p><p>Give them all the nice terms they need to get what they get done, and in return they "prefer" the Microsoft solution.  Stir in some clever bundling of products and services and you've got a base for windows leverage yet again.</p><p>Reeks of the same kind of thing that Vista is full of.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and I could just be ranting too.  Maybe they are stupid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they sign on with all the entities that people do n't like and do n't trust.Governments , big media , big corporate , you name it.Give them all the nice terms they need to get what they get done , and in return they " prefer " the Microsoft solution .
Stir in some clever bundling of products and services and you 've got a base for windows leverage yet again.Reeks of the same kind of thing that Vista is full of .
...and I could just be ranting too .
Maybe they are stupid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they sign on with all the entities that people don't like and don't trust.Governments, big media, big corporate, you name it.Give them all the nice terms they need to get what they get done, and in return they "prefer" the Microsoft solution.
Stir in some clever bundling of products and services and you've got a base for windows leverage yet again.Reeks of the same kind of thing that Vista is full of.
...and I could just be ranting too.
Maybe they are stupid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238175</id>
	<title>Re:'sex may return sexually explicit content'</title>
	<author>Concerned Onlooker</author>
	<datestamp>1244298660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm guessing that even <a href="http://www.apple.com/lae/sherlock/" title="apple.com">Sherlock</a> [apple.com] wouldn't have blocked that request.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing that even Sherlock [ apple.com ] would n't have blocked that request .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing that even Sherlock [apple.com] wouldn't have blocked that request.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239417</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1244315040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, I don't think Big Brother cares if you do the consume part, as long as you still don't slow down on the buy part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , I do n't think Big Brother cares if you do the consume part , as long as you still do n't slow down on the buy part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, I don't think Big Brother cares if you do the consume part, as long as you still don't slow down on the buy part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237951</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1244296620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should move to the US, I hear they don't have that problem.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should move to the US , I hear they do n't have that problem .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should move to the US, I hear they don't have that problem.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237653</id>
	<title>and then...</title>
	<author>SinShiva</author>
	<datestamp>1244294100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>there was pron.</htmltext>
<tokenext>there was pron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there was pron.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28266839</id>
	<title>Re:No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>stoned\_hamster</author>
	<datestamp>1244566860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>then they wont have the second largest population
<br> <br>
but really, there are all of those old people to teach them.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>then they wont have the second largest population but really , there are all of those old people to teach them.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then they wont have the second largest population
 
but really, there are all of those old people to teach them.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238435</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>dcollins117</author>
	<datestamp>1244301780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A search for "sex" would return sexually explicit content? Duh.</p></div><p>
Well I should certainly hope so. Otherwise it's not much of a search engine is it. What's really interesting is how Microsoft expects to compete with Google with shenanigans like this. Why would anyone choose a search engine that does not, by design, return results for the topic you search for?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A search for " sex " would return sexually explicit content ?
Duh . Well I should certainly hope so .
Otherwise it 's not much of a search engine is it .
What 's really interesting is how Microsoft expects to compete with Google with shenanigans like this .
Why would anyone choose a search engine that does not , by design , return results for the topic you search for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A search for "sex" would return sexually explicit content?
Duh.
Well I should certainly hope so.
Otherwise it's not much of a search engine is it.
What's really interesting is how Microsoft expects to compete with Google with shenanigans like this.
Why would anyone choose a search engine that does not, by design, return results for the topic you search for?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238501</id>
	<title>Bing, like the AppStore, is run in India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244302440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Basically you could call this reverse cultural imperialism, courtesy of the a multi-national's office in India. Which one? Pick one.</p><p>Last time it was Apple, now it's Microsoft.</p><p>That's why you can't search for sex on Bing.de, or buy an app that can search for the Kama Sutra.</p><p>Because doing so would violate the laws of {corp.name}'s India 'Research Office'. Which is where the servers are.</p><p>It's not like this hasn't happened before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically you could call this reverse cultural imperialism , courtesy of the a multi-national 's office in India .
Which one ?
Pick one.Last time it was Apple , now it 's Microsoft.That 's why you ca n't search for sex on Bing.de , or buy an app that can search for the Kama Sutra.Because doing so would violate the laws of { corp.name } 's India 'Research Office' .
Which is where the servers are.It 's not like this has n't happened before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically you could call this reverse cultural imperialism, courtesy of the a multi-national's office in India.
Which one?
Pick one.Last time it was Apple, now it's Microsoft.That's why you can't search for sex on Bing.de, or buy an app that can search for the Kama Sutra.Because doing so would violate the laws of {corp.name}'s India 'Research Office'.
Which is where the servers are.It's not like this hasn't happened before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239607</id>
	<title>new form of birth control ?</title>
	<author>parallel\_prankster</author>
	<datestamp>1244317920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe with a population of 1 billion and more, we dont need to search for sex. Infact, we should stop thinking about sex and start thinking about food and other things!!
Or is this a new way of birth control for us ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe with a population of 1 billion and more , we dont need to search for sex .
Infact , we should stop thinking about sex and start thinking about food and other things ! !
Or is this a new way of birth control for us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe with a population of 1 billion and more, we dont need to search for sex.
Infact, we should stop thinking about sex and start thinking about food and other things!!
Or is this a new way of birth control for us ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238525</id>
	<title>Remind me again who's evil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244302800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But but but but you told us Google censored results in China, so they fit your worldview by being evil, thus deliciously ironic!  But now Google isn't censoring things somewhere?</p><p>I am confused!  Please, internet hipster douchebags!  Please tell me who's evil and who isn't!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But but but but you told us Google censored results in China , so they fit your worldview by being evil , thus deliciously ironic !
But now Google is n't censoring things somewhere ? I am confused !
Please , internet hipster douchebags !
Please tell me who 's evil and who is n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But but but but you told us Google censored results in China, so they fit your worldview by being evil, thus deliciously ironic!
But now Google isn't censoring things somewhere?I am confused!
Please, internet hipster douchebags!
Please tell me who's evil and who isn't!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238309</id>
	<title>Also blocked in South Korea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244300340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google has some interesting stats on the term "sex"</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sex&amp;cmpt=q" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sex&amp;cmpt=q</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has some interesting stats on the term " sex " http : //www.google.com/insights/search/ # q = sex&amp;cmpt = q [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has some interesting stats on the term "sex"http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sex&amp;cmpt=q [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242767</id>
	<title>Re:Work-related?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244401740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I worked for MSFT tech support. The IIS and Media Server support groups have windowless offices that techs use when assisting customers who run sexually explicit websites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I worked for MSFT tech support .
The IIS and Media Server support groups have windowless offices that techs use when assisting customers who run sexually explicit websites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I worked for MSFT tech support.
The IIS and Media Server support groups have windowless offices that techs use when assisting customers who run sexually explicit websites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28247915</id>
	<title>Re:Pointing out the obvious...</title>
	<author>vidnet</author>
	<datestamp>1244492640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can't beat Google on results, so perhaps they want to talk schools and libraries into setting Microsoft Bing as their search page?</p><p>India is a huge source of new IT users with no existing search engine relationship. If Microsoft can make Bing their first exposure to web searches by playing the morality card, they could win a significant amount of users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ca n't beat Google on results , so perhaps they want to talk schools and libraries into setting Microsoft Bing as their search page ? India is a huge source of new IT users with no existing search engine relationship .
If Microsoft can make Bing their first exposure to web searches by playing the morality card , they could win a significant amount of users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can't beat Google on results, so perhaps they want to talk schools and libraries into setting Microsoft Bing as their search page?India is a huge source of new IT users with no existing search engine relationship.
If Microsoft can make Bing their first exposure to web searches by playing the morality card, they could win a significant amount of users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28245135</id>
	<title>indian law</title>
	<author>dredtech</author>
	<datestamp>1244377020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As much as i'm normally all for microshaft bashing.
In this case from what i've read, the problem is that under Indian law if bing returns anything even broadly suggestive, then MS gets sued and charged for "purveying or enabling". Bloody ridiculous I know, but not their fault. Easier to simply obey the laws of the country in question for them then to court MORE negative publicity or being blacklisted by the indian government, which is going to hurt market share one way or another.
Besides, different culture, different rules.
I'd be interested to hear what the Indian on the street thinks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as i 'm normally all for microshaft bashing .
In this case from what i 've read , the problem is that under Indian law if bing returns anything even broadly suggestive , then MS gets sued and charged for " purveying or enabling " .
Bloody ridiculous I know , but not their fault .
Easier to simply obey the laws of the country in question for them then to court MORE negative publicity or being blacklisted by the indian government , which is going to hurt market share one way or another .
Besides , different culture , different rules .
I 'd be interested to hear what the Indian on the street thinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as i'm normally all for microshaft bashing.
In this case from what i've read, the problem is that under Indian law if bing returns anything even broadly suggestive, then MS gets sued and charged for "purveying or enabling".
Bloody ridiculous I know, but not their fault.
Easier to simply obey the laws of the country in question for them then to court MORE negative publicity or being blacklisted by the indian government, which is going to hurt market share one way or another.
Besides, different culture, different rules.
I'd be interested to hear what the Indian on the street thinks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238997</id>
	<title>tor + indian sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244308260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tor in India only runs on Hurd... sex? BING!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tor in India only runs on Hurd... sex ? BING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tor in India only runs on Hurd... sex? BING!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238465</id>
	<title>who needs sex education in india</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244302080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its not like its a highly overpopulated, poor country, right?</p><p>better to keep indians ignorant of sex, in case they were to learn it might not be a good idea to bring yet another mouth to feed into the world</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its not like its a highly overpopulated , poor country , right ? better to keep indians ignorant of sex , in case they were to learn it might not be a good idea to bring yet another mouth to feed into the world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its not like its a highly overpopulated, poor country, right?better to keep indians ignorant of sex, in case they were to learn it might not be a good idea to bring yet another mouth to feed into the world</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238041</id>
	<title>Also, because we aren't having any</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244297460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing other people have sex or talk about it is depressing. Depression is a serious illness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing other people have sex or talk about it is depressing .
Depression is a serious illness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing other people have sex or talk about it is depressing.
Depression is a serious illness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237845</id>
	<title>Re:Can someone in India please try this link</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1244295840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is TPB in <i>Microsoft</i>'s index?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is TPB in Microsoft 's index ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is TPB in Microsoft's index?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238387</id>
	<title>considering that 'sex' is most searched term</title>
	<author>postmortem</author>
	<datestamp>1244301240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... this is very dumb on Microsoft's side.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... this is very dumb on Microsoft 's side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... this is very dumb on Microsoft's side.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242665</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244401080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must have missed the recent political developments in Germany. We have state censorship now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must have missed the recent political developments in Germany .
We have state censorship now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must have missed the recent political developments in Germany.
We have state censorship now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237855</id>
	<title>Excellent marketing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing's different content-filter policies are making the news everywhere. Sex sells and Bing seems to be an excellent porn search engine, with the easy video previews and Web 2.0 image search.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing 's different content-filter policies are making the news everywhere .
Sex sells and Bing seems to be an excellent porn search engine , with the easy video previews and Web 2.0 image search .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing's different content-filter policies are making the news everywhere.
Sex sells and Bing seems to be an excellent porn search engine, with the easy video previews and Web 2.0 image search.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715</id>
	<title>Can someone in India please try this link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=win+xp+serial&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH" title="bing.com">http://www.bing.com/search?q=win+xp+serial&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH</a> [bing.com]</p><p>It works great in the U.S.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.bing.com/search ? q = win + xp + serial&amp;go = &amp;form = QBLH [ bing.com ] It works great in the U.S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.bing.com/search?q=win+xp+serial&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH [bing.com]It works great in the U.S.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237701</id>
	<title>Work-related?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps Microsoft doesn't want it's tech support searching for certain things while on the job?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Microsoft does n't want it 's tech support searching for certain things while on the job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Microsoft doesn't want it's tech support searching for certain things while on the job?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241205</id>
	<title>Kamasutra is blocked!</title>
	<author>ashyanbhog</author>
	<datestamp>1244388660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing blocks Kamasutra in the land it was written in! Ballmer is losing it fast</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing blocks Kamasutra in the land it was written in !
Ballmer is losing it fast</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing blocks Kamasutra in the land it was written in!
Ballmer is losing it fast</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739</id>
	<title>Seriously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google blocks searches for "Freedom" "Liberty" and other similar terms in China.</p><p>You Google fanboys really need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid(TM), Google is no better than Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google blocks searches for " Freedom " " Liberty " and other similar terms in China.You Google fanboys really need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid ( TM ) , Google is no better than Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google blocks searches for "Freedom" "Liberty" and other similar terms in China.You Google fanboys really need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid(TM), Google is no better than Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725</id>
	<title>Pointing out the obvious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If their population, and the Kama Sutra, are any indication, the cat is definitely out of the bag! Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If their population , and the Kama Sutra , are any indication , the cat is definitely out of the bag !
Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If their population, and the Kama Sutra, are any indication, the cat is definitely out of the bag!
Why Microsoft would choose to limit this information is beyond me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239271</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just India...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244312640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Germany is really strict on Internet Porn.  I know parts of Flickr are blocked in Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Germany is really strict on Internet Porn .
I know parts of Flickr are blocked in Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germany is really strict on Internet Porn.
I know parts of Flickr are blocked in Germany.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807</id>
	<title>Foot, meet gun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations, Microsoft. You have just blocked one of the most popular topics on the internet, forcing people to use an other search engine. Google will love this decision<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , Microsoft .
You have just blocked one of the most popular topics on the internet , forcing people to use an other search engine .
Google will love this decision ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, Microsoft.
You have just blocked one of the most popular topics on the internet, forcing people to use an other search engine.
Google will love this decision ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238853</id>
	<title>What About the Kama Sutra?</title>
	<author>lag10</author>
	<datestamp>1244306460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some might say it's both pornographic and a significant piece of India's history.</p><p>Isn't India disrespecting a culturally relevant artifact by Microsoft disallowing such a search?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some might say it 's both pornographic and a significant piece of India 's history.Is n't India disrespecting a culturally relevant artifact by Microsoft disallowing such a search ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some might say it's both pornographic and a significant piece of India's history.Isn't India disrespecting a culturally relevant artifact by Microsoft disallowing such a search?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239805</id>
	<title>Competition</title>
	<author>bytesex</author>
	<datestamp>1244408040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is how companies undercut each other in countries that are ever so slightly inclined to mandate certain types of internet use.  Now, India's government has every excuse (I'm not saying that they will, I'm just saying that they might be tempted to try) to mandate 'bing' over 'google' as a matter of law.  Australia's recent history shows that this is not too over the top, and more than a billion people as your exclusive advertising audience is nothing the sneeze at.  Just tempt the people in power.  Ever so slightly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is how companies undercut each other in countries that are ever so slightly inclined to mandate certain types of internet use .
Now , India 's government has every excuse ( I 'm not saying that they will , I 'm just saying that they might be tempted to try ) to mandate 'bing ' over 'google ' as a matter of law .
Australia 's recent history shows that this is not too over the top , and more than a billion people as your exclusive advertising audience is nothing the sneeze at .
Just tempt the people in power .
Ever so slightly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is how companies undercut each other in countries that are ever so slightly inclined to mandate certain types of internet use.
Now, India's government has every excuse (I'm not saying that they will, I'm just saying that they might be tempted to try) to mandate 'bing' over 'google' as a matter of law.
Australia's recent history shows that this is not too over the top, and more than a billion people as your exclusive advertising audience is nothing the sneeze at.
Just tempt the people in power.
Ever so slightly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237965</id>
	<title>Phimsex and Sexviet</title>
	<author>Greg Hullender</author>
	<datestamp>1244296740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never mind India -- notice that when you do a US search for "sex" Bing suggests you also search for "phimsex" and "sexviet".  Neither of these terms is in the Urban dictionary, but (based on the search results) I think they're both synonyms for "spam".
<p>
--Greg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind India -- notice that when you do a US search for " sex " Bing suggests you also search for " phimsex " and " sexviet " .
Neither of these terms is in the Urban dictionary , but ( based on the search results ) I think they 're both synonyms for " spam " .
--Greg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind India -- notice that when you do a US search for "sex" Bing suggests you also search for "phimsex" and "sexviet".
Neither of these terms is in the Urban dictionary, but (based on the search results) I think they're both synonyms for "spam".
--Greg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645</id>
	<title>No matter what the search engine says,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244293980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... there is no sex in India's champagne room.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... there is no sex in India 's champagne room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... there is no sex in India's champagne room.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238401</id>
	<title>Isn't it obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244301360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't it obvious!? They don't want their employees in tech support looking at porn all day!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it obvious ! ?
They do n't want their employees in tech support looking at porn all day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it obvious!?
They don't want their employees in tech support looking at porn all day!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237657</id>
	<title>Do a search for 'young sex' or 'teen sex'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244294100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the USA, they are censoring your searches too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the USA , they are censoring your searches too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the USA, they are censoring your searches too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240353</id>
	<title>Re:Duh.</title>
	<author>Zontar The Mindless</author>
	<datestamp>1244376720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What if you are German, or want to find German sites containing information on the number six (sex)?</p></div><p> <tt>s/German/Swedish/g</tt></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you are German , or want to find German sites containing information on the number six ( sex ) ?
s/German/Swedish/g</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you are German, or want to find German sites containing information on the number six (sex)?
s/German/Swedish/g
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238161</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244298420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But there are a few differences. One, we have no evidence that the Indian government (which isn't as totalitarian as China's) asked MS to remove this term like in China. Two, Google has a responsibility to its shareholders to make the most profit. If Google got themselves banned from one of the largest developing economies with the most population and a captive audience, shareholders wouldn't be happy. Three, even though MS has this responsibility, there is no evidence they would be kicked out of India or India banning its citizens from accessing Bing like China would have done to Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But there are a few differences .
One , we have no evidence that the Indian government ( which is n't as totalitarian as China 's ) asked MS to remove this term like in China .
Two , Google has a responsibility to its shareholders to make the most profit .
If Google got themselves banned from one of the largest developing economies with the most population and a captive audience , shareholders would n't be happy .
Three , even though MS has this responsibility , there is no evidence they would be kicked out of India or India banning its citizens from accessing Bing like China would have done to Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there are a few differences.
One, we have no evidence that the Indian government (which isn't as totalitarian as China's) asked MS to remove this term like in China.
Two, Google has a responsibility to its shareholders to make the most profit.
If Google got themselves banned from one of the largest developing economies with the most population and a captive audience, shareholders wouldn't be happy.
Three, even though MS has this responsibility, there is no evidence they would be kicked out of India or India banning its citizens from accessing Bing like China would have done to Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237917</id>
	<title>Bing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244296380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People use Bing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People use Bing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People use Bing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246223</id>
	<title>Now we know the meaning of the word 'Bing"</title>
	<author>okmijnuhb</author>
	<datestamp>1244387040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As in; I was searching for 'microsoft sucks" and got "Binged"</htmltext>
<tokenext>As in ; I was searching for 'microsoft sucks " and got " Binged "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As in; I was searching for 'microsoft sucks" and got "Binged"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185</id>
	<title>It's not just India...</title>
	<author>ElKry</author>
	<datestamp>1244298780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, <b>including germany</b>:
<br> <br>
China<br>
Hong Kong<br>
Indonesia<br>
Malaysia<br>
Thailand<br>
Turkey<br>
And a lot of middle-east places, actually.<br> <br>

A lots of those I can see how this could make some warped sense for religious/political reasons, but can someone clarify why Germany? What makes it special?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message , including germany : China Hong Kong Indonesia Malaysia Thailand Turkey And a lot of middle-east places , actually .
A lots of those I can see how this could make some warped sense for religious/political reasons , but can someone clarify why Germany ?
What makes it special ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an entire list of countries where the search returns that message, including germany:
 
China
Hong Kong
Indonesia
Malaysia
Thailand
Turkey
And a lot of middle-east places, actually.
A lots of those I can see how this could make some warped sense for religious/political reasons, but can someone clarify why Germany?
What makes it special?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28252033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28244527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28248973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238269
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28281945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28247915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28266839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28249013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240587
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2338233_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28266839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28244527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238025
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28252033
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238017
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28247915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239273
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28241087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238271
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240353
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238669
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28249013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28246469
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28248973
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28240431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28281945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239271
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238175
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238053
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238909
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239119
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28239911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28238303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2338233.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28237701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2338233.28242767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
