<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_04_1620225</id>
	<title>Anti-Piracy Dog Uncovers Huge Cache of Discs</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244104680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:saintium@yah\%5B\%5Dcom\%5B'oo.'ingap\%5D" rel="nofollow">sgt scrub</a> writes <i>"I've never thought about sniffing my CDs before buying them but that is all about to change.  According to this Yahoo! news article, dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates. From the article, 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090603/wl\_asia\_afp/malaysiacrimecounterfeitfilmanimaloffbeat\_20090603122643">uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses</a>, many destined for export to Singapore, industry officials said on Wednesday. Paddy was given to Malaysia by the MPA to help close down piracy syndicates, which churn out vast quantities of illegal DVDs. The dog is specially trained to detect chemicals in the discs.'"</i> We ran a story about <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/18/218248&amp;tid=123">anti-piracy dogs being trained in Ireland</a> a few years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>sgt scrub writes " I 've never thought about sniffing my CDs before buying them but that is all about to change .
According to this Yahoo !
news article , dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates .
From the article , 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses , many destined for export to Singapore , industry officials said on Wednesday .
Paddy was given to Malaysia by the MPA to help close down piracy syndicates , which churn out vast quantities of illegal DVDs .
The dog is specially trained to detect chemicals in the discs .
' " We ran a story about anti-piracy dogs being trained in Ireland a few years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sgt scrub writes "I've never thought about sniffing my CDs before buying them but that is all about to change.
According to this Yahoo!
news article, dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates.
From the article, 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses, many destined for export to Singapore, industry officials said on Wednesday.
Paddy was given to Malaysia by the MPA to help close down piracy syndicates, which churn out vast quantities of illegal DVDs.
The dog is specially trained to detect chemicals in the discs.
'" We ran a story about anti-piracy dogs being trained in Ireland a few years ago.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216033</id>
	<title>"Anti-Piracy Dog"</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1244115480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds like a name of a mascot/fake\_superhero the MPAA uses to explain copyright to children.</p><p>Jimmy: "Have you seen the new OMG Ponies movie?"<br>Jane: "No.  Hey, let's download it!"<br>Jimmy: "Yeah!"<br>[Whooshing noise]<br>Jimmy and Jane in unison: "Anti-Piracy Dog!"<br>Anti-Piracy Dog: "Hi kids.  You were about to download a movie.  Every time you do that, a pirate throws a puppy into a wood-chipper."<br>Jimmy: "Is it the cute kind of puppy?"<br>Jane (nearly in tears): "That's the only kind of puppy there is!  Oh no!  I don't want cute puppies to die! What are we going to do?"<br>Jimmy (gravely): "We'll have to buy our movies, and only from authorized resellers."<br>Anti-Piracy Dog: "That's right, kids.  So remember, don't pirate those movies."<br>Jane and Jimmy in unison, overflowing with cheer: "Thanks, Anti-Piracy Dog!"<br>Anti-Piracy Dog: "Up, up, and away!"<br>[Whooshing noise]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds like a name of a mascot/fake \ _superhero the MPAA uses to explain copyright to children.Jimmy : " Have you seen the new OMG Ponies movie ?
" Jane : " No .
Hey , let 's download it !
" Jimmy : " Yeah !
" [ Whooshing noise ] Jimmy and Jane in unison : " Anti-Piracy Dog !
" Anti-Piracy Dog : " Hi kids .
You were about to download a movie .
Every time you do that , a pirate throws a puppy into a wood-chipper .
" Jimmy : " Is it the cute kind of puppy ?
" Jane ( nearly in tears ) : " That 's the only kind of puppy there is !
Oh no !
I do n't want cute puppies to die !
What are we going to do ?
" Jimmy ( gravely ) : " We 'll have to buy our movies , and only from authorized resellers .
" Anti-Piracy Dog : " That 's right , kids .
So remember , do n't pirate those movies .
" Jane and Jimmy in unison , overflowing with cheer : " Thanks , Anti-Piracy Dog !
" Anti-Piracy Dog : " Up , up , and away !
" [ Whooshing noise ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds like a name of a mascot/fake\_superhero the MPAA uses to explain copyright to children.Jimmy: "Have you seen the new OMG Ponies movie?
"Jane: "No.
Hey, let's download it!
"Jimmy: "Yeah!
"[Whooshing noise]Jimmy and Jane in unison: "Anti-Piracy Dog!
"Anti-Piracy Dog: "Hi kids.
You were about to download a movie.
Every time you do that, a pirate throws a puppy into a wood-chipper.
"Jimmy: "Is it the cute kind of puppy?
"Jane (nearly in tears): "That's the only kind of puppy there is!
Oh no!
I don't want cute puppies to die!
What are we going to do?
"Jimmy (gravely): "We'll have to buy our movies, and only from authorized resellers.
"Anti-Piracy Dog: "That's right, kids.
So remember, don't pirate those movies.
"Jane and Jimmy in unison, overflowing with cheer: "Thanks, Anti-Piracy Dog!
"Anti-Piracy Dog: "Up, up, and away!
"[Whooshing noise]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>False dilemma. We can do both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>False dilemma .
We can do both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>False dilemma.
We can do both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214787</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1244109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks?</p><p>How about just data only disks with no movies on them?</p></div></blockquote><p>It wouldn't surprise me that "burned" DVD-R have a slightly different smell than a normal one, something that a dog can detect.</p><p>OTOH, I would think big time pirate would just professionally "press" a dvd rather than burning them?  No clue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks ? How about just data only disks with no movies on them ? It would n't surprise me that " burned " DVD-R have a slightly different smell than a normal one , something that a dog can detect.OTOH , I would think big time pirate would just professionally " press " a dvd rather than burning them ?
No clue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks?How about just data only disks with no movies on them?It wouldn't surprise me that "burned" DVD-R have a slightly different smell than a normal one, something that a dog can detect.OTOH, I would think big time pirate would just professionally "press" a dvd rather than burning them?
No clue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220605</id>
	<title>Are we supposed to believe this shit?</title>
	<author>Tyr.1358</author>
	<datestamp>1244207160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates"</p><p>Are you fucking kidding me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates " Are you fucking kidding me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates"Are you fucking kidding me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216795</id>
	<title>The roll of the dice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244119860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>FIX YOUR FUCKIN' CODE</i> </p><p>I can't get Slashdot to display pages consistently in a single <b>session.</b> </p><p>It's definitely a downer.</p><p> The geekiest - most FOSS and standards-obsessed site on the web - can't do plain text against a colored background and get it right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FIX YOUR FUCKIN ' CODE I ca n't get Slashdot to display pages consistently in a single session .
It 's definitely a downer .
The geekiest - most FOSS and standards-obsessed site on the web - ca n't do plain text against a colored background and get it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FIX YOUR FUCKIN' CODE I can't get Slashdot to display pages consistently in a single session.
It's definitely a downer.
The geekiest - most FOSS and standards-obsessed site on the web - can't do plain text against a colored background and get it right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215625</id>
	<title>Encryption?</title>
	<author>omuls are tasty</author>
	<datestamp>1244113140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But can they smell it if you encrypt the contents? HA!</htmltext>
<tokenext>But can they smell it if you encrypt the contents ?
HA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But can they smell it if you encrypt the contents?
HA!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224465</id>
	<title>Re:"Anti-Piracy Dog"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wish i hadn't wasted my mod points...  This is hilarious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wish i had n't wasted my mod points... This is hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wish i hadn't wasted my mod points...  This is hilarious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216439</id>
	<title>Re:DVD-R is not even an issue.</title>
	<author>KronosReaver</author>
	<datestamp>1244117940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when does idiocy get modded interesting?</p><p>They dogs are not sniffing out DVD-R discs, they are sniffing out Pirated DVD's... mass produced in nearly the same way as legit DVD's, with the intent of being sold to large numbers of end consumers, either as a cheaper alternative, or because the real thing is not available in that region yet, often because they are new theater releases.</p><p>So you can put away the tin foil, your "Pirated", and then burnt to DVD-R copy of The Hannah Montana Movie is safe from the dogs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when does idiocy get modded interesting ? They dogs are not sniffing out DVD-R discs , they are sniffing out Pirated DVD 's... mass produced in nearly the same way as legit DVD 's , with the intent of being sold to large numbers of end consumers , either as a cheaper alternative , or because the real thing is not available in that region yet , often because they are new theater releases.So you can put away the tin foil , your " Pirated " , and then burnt to DVD-R copy of The Hannah Montana Movie is safe from the dogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when does idiocy get modded interesting?They dogs are not sniffing out DVD-R discs, they are sniffing out Pirated DVD's... mass produced in nearly the same way as legit DVD's, with the intent of being sold to large numbers of end consumers, either as a cheaper alternative, or because the real thing is not available in that region yet, often because they are new theater releases.So you can put away the tin foil, your "Pirated", and then burnt to DVD-R copy of The Hannah Montana Movie is safe from the dogs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221017</id>
	<title>Good for them!</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1244210220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good for them, its about time , we should only download and burn ourselves, and not let China in on our piracy movement or help us with it, because that actually does hurt us more then the actual downloading of a movie. If i download a movie, it means I might not really have bought it, for cash, so technically, there is no loss of revenue. If i buy a pirated dvd from China, not knowing it was from China, I was buying that dvd, which it in itself is real lost cash for the movie companies. I applaud there effort.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for them , its about time , we should only download and burn ourselves , and not let China in on our piracy movement or help us with it , because that actually does hurt us more then the actual downloading of a movie .
If i download a movie , it means I might not really have bought it , for cash , so technically , there is no loss of revenue .
If i buy a pirated dvd from China , not knowing it was from China , I was buying that dvd , which it in itself is real lost cash for the movie companies .
I applaud there effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for them, its about time , we should only download and burn ourselves, and not let China in on our piracy movement or help us with it, because that actually does hurt us more then the actual downloading of a movie.
If i download a movie, it means I might not really have bought it, for cash, so technically, there is no loss of revenue.
If i buy a pirated dvd from China, not knowing it was from China, I was buying that dvd, which it in itself is real lost cash for the movie companies.
I applaud there effort.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218103</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1244132880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another reason for police dogs to bark at my car.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason for police dogs to bark at my car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason for police dogs to bark at my car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222679</id>
	<title>Re:Steak.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244217840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought a pirated DVD years ago. The night before I saw "Vandetta" and then at lunch the day next (a Mex taqueria on Lafayette St in Santa Clara) there it was!, on sale for $9 from the little lady who sold DVDs on the sidewalk! So I bought one. It was crap. So maybe THAT's what the dog smelled. Or else infused with the odors of aroz and chili verde the DVDs were returned at some point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought a pirated DVD years ago .
The night before I saw " Vandetta " and then at lunch the day next ( a Mex taqueria on Lafayette St in Santa Clara ) there it was ! , on sale for $ 9 from the little lady who sold DVDs on the sidewalk !
So I bought one .
It was crap .
So maybe THAT 's what the dog smelled .
Or else infused with the odors of aroz and chili verde the DVDs were returned at some point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought a pirated DVD years ago.
The night before I saw "Vandetta" and then at lunch the day next (a Mex taqueria on Lafayette St in Santa Clara) there it was!, on sale for $9 from the little lady who sold DVDs on the sidewalk!
So I bought one.
It was crap.
So maybe THAT's what the dog smelled.
Or else infused with the odors of aroz and chili verde the DVDs were returned at some point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Moryath</author>
	<datestamp>1244110260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As opposed to me buying a shipment of, say, 500 Taiyo Yuden DVD+r's so that I'm set for my monthly backup regimen?</p><p>Please.</p><p>"We got a dog that smells something that we usually associate with the smell of something that might be in some way be used to commit a crime."</p><p>Bullshit. You got the same quality dog as the fucking "drug sniffing" dog that tore apart my luggage in O'Hare because I'd packed (nicely sealed up and everything) a box of frozen bratwurst with a 24-hour gelpack block to bring home as a gift to my roommate. I suppose I COULD be meaning to bludgeon him to death with frozen bratwurst, but I really doubt it.</p><p>This sort of "search" crap is beyond stupid. Either search something, or don't, but don't pretend that your "search dog", who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia, is justification for doing so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to me buying a shipment of , say , 500 Taiyo Yuden DVD + r 's so that I 'm set for my monthly backup regimen ? Please .
" We got a dog that smells something that we usually associate with the smell of something that might be in some way be used to commit a crime. " Bullshit .
You got the same quality dog as the fucking " drug sniffing " dog that tore apart my luggage in O'Hare because I 'd packed ( nicely sealed up and everything ) a box of frozen bratwurst with a 24-hour gelpack block to bring home as a gift to my roommate .
I suppose I COULD be meaning to bludgeon him to death with frozen bratwurst , but I really doubt it.This sort of " search " crap is beyond stupid .
Either search something , or do n't , but do n't pretend that your " search dog " , who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia , is justification for doing so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to me buying a shipment of, say, 500 Taiyo Yuden DVD+r's so that I'm set for my monthly backup regimen?Please.
"We got a dog that smells something that we usually associate with the smell of something that might be in some way be used to commit a crime."Bullshit.
You got the same quality dog as the fucking "drug sniffing" dog that tore apart my luggage in O'Hare because I'd packed (nicely sealed up and everything) a box of frozen bratwurst with a 24-hour gelpack block to bring home as a gift to my roommate.
I suppose I COULD be meaning to bludgeon him to death with frozen bratwurst, but I really doubt it.This sort of "search" crap is beyond stupid.
Either search something, or don't, but don't pretend that your "search dog", who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia, is justification for doing so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219225</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1244232780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is anyone else besides me beginning to get the feeling that someone has figured out that if you teach a dog to go to where you direct it, with subtle, barely perceptible signals only noticeable by a dog, and just pretend that the dog did it on their own, that nobody ever questions that?</p><p>Is this just another way around a search warrant?</p><p>IANAL (obviously!), so can someone that IS please clue us in? Does a DOG need a search warrant, and if not, WHY not? How is evidence that is found by a dog, but not under a search warrant, viewed by courts? Is it admissible?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone else besides me beginning to get the feeling that someone has figured out that if you teach a dog to go to where you direct it , with subtle , barely perceptible signals only noticeable by a dog , and just pretend that the dog did it on their own , that nobody ever questions that ? Is this just another way around a search warrant ? IANAL ( obviously !
) , so can someone that IS please clue us in ?
Does a DOG need a search warrant , and if not , WHY not ?
How is evidence that is found by a dog , but not under a search warrant , viewed by courts ?
Is it admissible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone else besides me beginning to get the feeling that someone has figured out that if you teach a dog to go to where you direct it, with subtle, barely perceptible signals only noticeable by a dog, and just pretend that the dog did it on their own, that nobody ever questions that?Is this just another way around a search warrant?IANAL (obviously!
), so can someone that IS please clue us in?
Does a DOG need a search warrant, and if not, WHY not?
How is evidence that is found by a dog, but not under a search warrant, viewed by courts?
Is it admissible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215515</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>bitt3n</author>
	<datestamp>1244112720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've heard that cocaine traffickers screw with drug dogs using capsicum powder. maybe the same thing would work here using copies of Gigli.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've heard that cocaine traffickers screw with drug dogs using capsicum powder .
maybe the same thing would work here using copies of Gigli .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've heard that cocaine traffickers screw with drug dogs using capsicum powder.
maybe the same thing would work here using copies of Gigli.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215501</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>bitt3n</author>
	<datestamp>1244112660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he's absolutely right. why are we needlessly giving these jobs to dogs when we could be employing the blind?</htmltext>
<tokenext>he 's absolutely right .
why are we needlessly giving these jobs to dogs when we could be employing the blind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he's absolutely right.
why are we needlessly giving these jobs to dogs when we could be employing the blind?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220407</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>eastlight\_jim</author>
	<datestamp>1244205660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know exactly what you mean.  There's a certain smell to burned media after the drive's got warm burning a few disks.  It's quite a unique smell and certainly unique enough to train a dog on.

I do take the point made by a sibling about the scale of professional piracy and the liklehood of stamped media but in the case of 35,000 disks, this could be done on 10 10-disk duplicators in a month at 5 minutes a disk. Maybe possible...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know exactly what you mean .
There 's a certain smell to burned media after the drive 's got warm burning a few disks .
It 's quite a unique smell and certainly unique enough to train a dog on .
I do take the point made by a sibling about the scale of professional piracy and the liklehood of stamped media but in the case of 35,000 disks , this could be done on 10 10-disk duplicators in a month at 5 minutes a disk .
Maybe possible.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know exactly what you mean.
There's a certain smell to burned media after the drive's got warm burning a few disks.
It's quite a unique smell and certainly unique enough to train a dog on.
I do take the point made by a sibling about the scale of professional piracy and the liklehood of stamped media but in the case of 35,000 disks, this could be done on 10 10-disk duplicators in a month at 5 minutes a disk.
Maybe possible...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222099</id>
	<title>Actual Losses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244215500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:</p><p><i>The MPA said its member companies lost 6.1 billion dollars to worldwide piracy in 2005. Of that lost revenue, about 1.2 billion dollars came from piracy in the Asian region.</i> </p><p>I just hate when they try to make up stats for this.</p><p>There's a big difference between pirated movies purchased and actual financial losses.</p><p>In a lot of cases, people are only buying the movie BECAUSE it's being sold for $1.00.</p><p>If it wasn't being sold for dirt cheap by the pirates in these poor countries, it's not like these people would all of a sudden rush to amazon.com and go pay full price for the DVD.  It's nearly impossible to tell how many DVDs you would have sold if piracy didn't exist.</p><p>I'm not defending the piracy in these countries, but I can guarantee you that the MPA grossly overstates their losses to make their situation look even worse.</p><p>I bet they're going to have to go bankrupt or ask for a bailout soon!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : The MPA said its member companies lost 6.1 billion dollars to worldwide piracy in 2005 .
Of that lost revenue , about 1.2 billion dollars came from piracy in the Asian region .
I just hate when they try to make up stats for this.There 's a big difference between pirated movies purchased and actual financial losses.In a lot of cases , people are only buying the movie BECAUSE it 's being sold for $ 1.00.If it was n't being sold for dirt cheap by the pirates in these poor countries , it 's not like these people would all of a sudden rush to amazon.com and go pay full price for the DVD .
It 's nearly impossible to tell how many DVDs you would have sold if piracy did n't exist.I 'm not defending the piracy in these countries , but I can guarantee you that the MPA grossly overstates their losses to make their situation look even worse.I bet they 're going to have to go bankrupt or ask for a bailout soon ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:The MPA said its member companies lost 6.1 billion dollars to worldwide piracy in 2005.
Of that lost revenue, about 1.2 billion dollars came from piracy in the Asian region.
I just hate when they try to make up stats for this.There's a big difference between pirated movies purchased and actual financial losses.In a lot of cases, people are only buying the movie BECAUSE it's being sold for $1.00.If it wasn't being sold for dirt cheap by the pirates in these poor countries, it's not like these people would all of a sudden rush to amazon.com and go pay full price for the DVD.
It's nearly impossible to tell how many DVDs you would have sold if piracy didn't exist.I'm not defending the piracy in these countries, but I can guarantee you that the MPA grossly overstates their losses to make their situation look even worse.I bet they're going to have to go bankrupt or ask for a bailout soon!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214823</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>CastrTroy</author>
	<datestamp>1244109180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not saying I don't have any illegitimate copies of software/movies/music, but I also don't try to pretend that having these objects is completely ok.    If you don't like the way their business model is run, the only right way to protest it is to not consume the media in any way.  If you pirate it, you are basically saying that the product is worth something to you, but that you don't want to pay the price they are asking for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not saying I do n't have any illegitimate copies of software/movies/music , but I also do n't try to pretend that having these objects is completely ok. If you do n't like the way their business model is run , the only right way to protest it is to not consume the media in any way .
If you pirate it , you are basically saying that the product is worth something to you , but that you do n't want to pay the price they are asking for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not saying I don't have any illegitimate copies of software/movies/music, but I also don't try to pretend that having these objects is completely ok.    If you don't like the way their business model is run, the only right way to protest it is to not consume the media in any way.
If you pirate it, you are basically saying that the product is worth something to you, but that you don't want to pay the price they are asking for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215927</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244114880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You got the same quality dog as the fucking "drug sniffing" dog that tore apart my luggage in O'Hare</p></div></blockquote><p>If the dog doesn't bark nothing happens.  If the dog barks and there is something, he gets a reward.  If the dog barks and there isn't something, he doesn't get his bastard balls hit repeatedly with a bamboo stick.</p><p>You don't have to be John Nash to predict what muttley's going to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You got the same quality dog as the fucking " drug sniffing " dog that tore apart my luggage in O'HareIf the dog does n't bark nothing happens .
If the dog barks and there is something , he gets a reward .
If the dog barks and there is n't something , he does n't get his bastard balls hit repeatedly with a bamboo stick.You do n't have to be John Nash to predict what muttley 's going to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got the same quality dog as the fucking "drug sniffing" dog that tore apart my luggage in O'HareIf the dog doesn't bark nothing happens.
If the dog barks and there is something, he gets a reward.
If the dog barks and there isn't something, he doesn't get his bastard balls hit repeatedly with a bamboo stick.You don't have to be John Nash to predict what muttley's going to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215031</id>
	<title>It's because pirates stink, duh!</title>
	<author>socz</author>
	<datestamp>1244110320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason the dogs can tell the difference is because pressed and burnt dvd's aren't made the same. Pressed uses less layers and different materials. Burnable uses inks that is what probably gives them away as "pirated."
<br> <br>
That and being a pirate/biker myself (pirate by blood, my great grandfather was a Spanish pirate in Campeche!) we stink. So apparently we need to improve our hygiene!  BTW have you seen Anakata lately? Now do you believe me about hygiene...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason the dogs can tell the difference is because pressed and burnt dvd 's are n't made the same .
Pressed uses less layers and different materials .
Burnable uses inks that is what probably gives them away as " pirated .
" That and being a pirate/biker myself ( pirate by blood , my great grandfather was a Spanish pirate in Campeche !
) we stink .
So apparently we need to improve our hygiene !
BTW have you seen Anakata lately ?
Now do you believe me about hygiene... : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason the dogs can tell the difference is because pressed and burnt dvd's aren't made the same.
Pressed uses less layers and different materials.
Burnable uses inks that is what probably gives them away as "pirated.
"
 
That and being a pirate/biker myself (pirate by blood, my great grandfather was a Spanish pirate in Campeche!
) we stink.
So apparently we need to improve our hygiene!
BTW have you seen Anakata lately?
Now do you believe me about hygiene... :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215589</id>
	<title>Easy solution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just rub your cd's in cannabis to cover the smell...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just rub your cd 's in cannabis to cover the smell.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just rub your cd's in cannabis to cover the smell...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218785</id>
	<title>Re:THAT is piracy</title>
	<author>Vainglorious Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1244140320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me...The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE. These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent.</p></div></blockquote><p>I still don't think it's a good idea to describe these disks as "pirated" - the terms <b> <i>counterfeit</i> </b> or <b> <i>bootleg</i> </b> are far more appropriate.  Let's reserve the pejorative "piracy" for what goes on off the coast of Somalia</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me...The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE .
These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent.I still do n't think it 's a good idea to describe these disks as " pirated " - the terms counterfeit or bootleg are far more appropriate .
Let 's reserve the pejorative " piracy " for what goes on off the coast of Somalia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me...The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE.
These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent.I still don't think it's a good idea to describe these disks as "pirated" - the terms  counterfeit  or  bootleg  are far more appropriate.
Let's reserve the pejorative "piracy" for what goes on off the coast of Somalia
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216219</id>
	<title>True, but if you believe in copyright at all...</title>
	<author>weston</author>
	<datestamp>1244116560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music. </i></p><p>This may be more or less true (the RIAA itself certainly can't/doesn't produce anything, and the record labels are more or less businesses that hire talent, not producers themselves), but it doesn't say anything about the relative merits of piracy-sniffing dogs.</p><p>Selling unauthorized reproductions of a given work is an action on a completely different order from passing a recording on to a friend or two, and there's even ready distinctions between it and sticking a recording out onto a filesharing network. I'm not particularly sympathetic to the RIAA and labels when it comes to the later, but I don't have any problem with them nailing mass pirates to the wall when they're essentially selling bootleg knock-offs of a real product on a large scale. It makes sense if you believe in copyright at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music .
This may be more or less true ( the RIAA itself certainly ca n't/does n't produce anything , and the record labels are more or less businesses that hire talent , not producers themselves ) , but it does n't say anything about the relative merits of piracy-sniffing dogs.Selling unauthorized reproductions of a given work is an action on a completely different order from passing a recording on to a friend or two , and there 's even ready distinctions between it and sticking a recording out onto a filesharing network .
I 'm not particularly sympathetic to the RIAA and labels when it comes to the later , but I do n't have any problem with them nailing mass pirates to the wall when they 're essentially selling bootleg knock-offs of a real product on a large scale .
It makes sense if you believe in copyright at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music.
This may be more or less true (the RIAA itself certainly can't/doesn't produce anything, and the record labels are more or less businesses that hire talent, not producers themselves), but it doesn't say anything about the relative merits of piracy-sniffing dogs.Selling unauthorized reproductions of a given work is an action on a completely different order from passing a recording on to a friend or two, and there's even ready distinctions between it and sticking a recording out onto a filesharing network.
I'm not particularly sympathetic to the RIAA and labels when it comes to the later, but I don't have any problem with them nailing mass pirates to the wall when they're essentially selling bootleg knock-offs of a real product on a large scale.
It makes sense if you believe in copyright at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216025</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244115420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.</p><p>Way to go, humanity!</p></div><p>And some people use dogs as just a pet. What a waste!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...There's a lot of dogs in the world. There's enough to go around to be trained for many useful things.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>just great , instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people , they use them for useless stuff like this.Way to go , humanity ! And some people use dogs as just a pet .
What a waste !
...There 's a lot of dogs in the world .
There 's enough to go around to be trained for many useful things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.Way to go, humanity!And some people use dogs as just a pet.
What a waste!
...There's a lot of dogs in the world.
There's enough to go around to be trained for many useful things.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859</id>
	<title>Let Me Guess . . .</title>
	<author>StefanJ</author>
	<datestamp>1244109360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>25,000 copies of BOLT.</p><p>7,500 copies of Lady and the Tramp</p><p>2,500 copies of Reservoir Dogs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>25,000 copies of BOLT.7,500 copies of Lady and the Tramp2,500 copies of Reservoir Dogs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>25,000 copies of BOLT.7,500 copies of Lady and the Tramp2,500 copies of Reservoir Dogs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216363</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1244117460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The dog probably won't sniff DVD-Rs - for larger scale copying you would injection mold the foil and encase it with  polycarbonate plastic. According to this: <a href="http://www.replication.com/cd-dvd-copying.php" title="replication.com">http://www.replication.com/cd-dvd-copying.php</a> [replication.com] it would become more economical to do that once you reach 500 or more copies. The glue probably smells differently, and that's likely what the dog reacts to.
<p>
They could let the dog check various shipments, and when it finds one which smells like DVDs - but doesn't declare that on the shipping papers, they would have a closer look.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dog probably wo n't sniff DVD-Rs - for larger scale copying you would injection mold the foil and encase it with polycarbonate plastic .
According to this : http : //www.replication.com/cd-dvd-copying.php [ replication.com ] it would become more economical to do that once you reach 500 or more copies .
The glue probably smells differently , and that 's likely what the dog reacts to .
They could let the dog check various shipments , and when it finds one which smells like DVDs - but does n't declare that on the shipping papers , they would have a closer look .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dog probably won't sniff DVD-Rs - for larger scale copying you would injection mold the foil and encase it with  polycarbonate plastic.
According to this: http://www.replication.com/cd-dvd-copying.php [replication.com] it would become more economical to do that once you reach 500 or more copies.
The glue probably smells differently, and that's likely what the dog reacts to.
They could let the dog check various shipments, and when it finds one which smells like DVDs - but doesn't declare that on the shipping papers, they would have a closer look.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214779</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone is profiting from selling 35,000 copies of something you put together to sell youself, how is it abuse of the legal system to try to stop them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone is profiting from selling 35,000 copies of something you put together to sell youself , how is it abuse of the legal system to try to stop them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone is profiting from selling 35,000 copies of something you put together to sell youself, how is it abuse of the legal system to try to stop them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</id>
	<title>So....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music. They can bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs. You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music .
They can bribe judges , hire lawyers , buy congress , complain , make commercials and now train dogs .
You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music.
They can bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs.
You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218339</id>
	<title>Easy duty</title>
	<author>emaname</author>
	<datestamp>1244135460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sniffing for DVDs sure beats sniffing for explosives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sniffing for DVDs sure beats sniffing for explosives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sniffing for DVDs sure beats sniffing for explosives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215051</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244110440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music.</p></div><p>In your opinion...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>They can bribe judges,</p></div><p>[Citation needed]</p><p><div class="quote"><p>hire lawyers,</p></div><p> <i>Anyone</i> can hire lawyers.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>buy congress,</p></div><p>You must be new here (to the United States).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>complain,</p></div><p>Anyone can complain. You're doing it now!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>make commercials</p></div><p>Uh...OK...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and now train dogs.</p></div><p>Yeah, so?  It worked, didn't it?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.</p></div><p>How did you go from "trained dog" to "legal system abused"?</p><p>With how much ranting about music goes on around here, you would think they were taking away your food or something else that's actually important instead...</p><p>Get a grip. Don't buy their product if you don't want it (or don't like the strings attached). Simple as that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music.In your opinion...They can bribe judges , [ Citation needed ] hire lawyers , Anyone can hire lawyers.buy congress,You must be new here ( to the United States ) .complain,Anyone can complain .
You 're doing it now ! make commercialsUh...OK...and now train dogs.Yeah , so ?
It worked , did n't it ? You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.How did you go from " trained dog " to " legal system abused " ? With how much ranting about music goes on around here , you would think they were taking away your food or something else that 's actually important instead...Get a grip .
Do n't buy their product if you do n't want it ( or do n't like the strings attached ) .
Simple as that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So apparently recording agencies are able to do anything except record good music.In your opinion...They can bribe judges,[Citation needed]hire lawyers, Anyone can hire lawyers.buy congress,You must be new here (to the United States).complain,Anyone can complain.
You're doing it now!make commercialsUh...OK...and now train dogs.Yeah, so?
It worked, didn't it?You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.How did you go from "trained dog" to "legal system abused"?With how much ranting about music goes on around here, you would think they were taking away your food or something else that's actually important instead...Get a grip.
Don't buy their product if you don't want it (or don't like the strings attached).
Simple as that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220573</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Slashdot,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244206920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WFM (Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP SP3).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WFM ( Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP SP3 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WFM (Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP SP3).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215089</id>
	<title>i know that smell</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1244110620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>must be the smell of rum</htmltext>
<tokenext>must be the smell of rum</tokentext>
<sentencetext>must be the smell of rum</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216477</id>
	<title>Tell me why....</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1244118060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.<br>Way to go, humanity!</i> </p><p>Tell me why the geek thinks that no one but a geek can multi-task.</p><p> Hasn't the skill.</p><p> Hasn't the resources.</p><p>Service animals have been performing jobs like these for ten thousand years.</p><p> The nomad tracking game. The canary in the mine.</p><p> What has changed is our appreciation of the animal's senses.</p><p> His intelligence.</p><p>But the truth, of course, is that the geek only trots out this argument when the nose points towards him.</p><p>The nose knows.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just great , instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people , they use them for useless stuff like this.Way to go , humanity !
Tell me why the geek thinks that no one but a geek can multi-task .
Has n't the skill .
Has n't the resources.Service animals have been performing jobs like these for ten thousand years .
The nomad tracking game .
The canary in the mine .
What has changed is our appreciation of the animal 's senses .
His intelligence.But the truth , of course , is that the geek only trots out this argument when the nose points towards him.The nose knows .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.Way to go, humanity!
Tell me why the geek thinks that no one but a geek can multi-task.
Hasn't the skill.
Hasn't the resources.Service animals have been performing jobs like these for ten thousand years.
The nomad tracking game.
The canary in the mine.
What has changed is our appreciation of the animal's senses.
His intelligence.But the truth, of course, is that the geek only trots out this argument when the nose points towards him.The nose knows.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215223</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1244111160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about that. Perhaps the dog's just trained to smell permanent marker. Some of those fake DVDs aren't all that high quality<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about that .
Perhaps the dog 's just trained to smell permanent marker .
Some of those fake DVDs are n't all that high quality ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about that.
Perhaps the dog's just trained to smell permanent marker.
Some of those fake DVDs aren't all that high quality ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214943</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Farmer Tim</author>
	<datestamp>1244109840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My guess is that it isn't the polycarbonate (which is common enough that the dogs would be in a constant frenzy), but rather the chemicals used in the dyes in burnable media (cyanide compounds, IIRC) which are aren't present in stamped media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess is that it is n't the polycarbonate ( which is common enough that the dogs would be in a constant frenzy ) , but rather the chemicals used in the dyes in burnable media ( cyanide compounds , IIRC ) which are are n't present in stamped media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess is that it isn't the polycarbonate (which is common enough that the dogs would be in a constant frenzy), but rather the chemicals used in the dyes in burnable media (cyanide compounds, IIRC) which are aren't present in stamped media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215851</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>dank zappingly</author>
	<datestamp>1244114520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can whoever the hell modded this comment as insightful explain the following to me:<p>

How is this insightful?  Even if the article was about music and the abuse of the legal system, wouldn't the fact that someone pirated music tend to support the idea that someone else finds value in it?</p><p>

How does this comment(which seems to assume that the RIAA trained these dogs to sniff out pirated CD's) relate to an article about trained Malaysian dogs sniffing out pirated DVD's?</p><p>

I understand that these views are valued highly here on slashdot, but they don't relate to the article or the discussion.  I'm surprised I haven't seen any "insightful" comments complaining about Sony's rootkits yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can whoever the hell modded this comment as insightful explain the following to me : How is this insightful ?
Even if the article was about music and the abuse of the legal system , would n't the fact that someone pirated music tend to support the idea that someone else finds value in it ?
How does this comment ( which seems to assume that the RIAA trained these dogs to sniff out pirated CD 's ) relate to an article about trained Malaysian dogs sniffing out pirated DVD 's ?
I understand that these views are valued highly here on slashdot , but they do n't relate to the article or the discussion .
I 'm surprised I have n't seen any " insightful " comments complaining about Sony 's rootkits yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can whoever the hell modded this comment as insightful explain the following to me:

How is this insightful?
Even if the article was about music and the abuse of the legal system, wouldn't the fact that someone pirated music tend to support the idea that someone else finds value in it?
How does this comment(which seems to assume that the RIAA trained these dogs to sniff out pirated CD's) relate to an article about trained Malaysian dogs sniffing out pirated DVD's?
I understand that these views are valued highly here on slashdot, but they don't relate to the article or the discussion.
I'm surprised I haven't seen any "insightful" comments complaining about Sony's rootkits yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215099</id>
	<title>Not exactly</title>
	<author>Weezul</author>
	<datestamp>1244110680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Commercial music is designed for easy marketability, like most other consumer products.  Examples :</p><p>(1) Apples exist in numerous different varieties all over the wold.  We don't eat the best tasting ones, not by far, we eat the ones that still look red after being shipped.</p><p>(2) Potato chip companies made chips without added sugar for years because taste tests shows people preferred potato chips without sugar.  But then some clever bastard noticed that people eat more chips if they add sugar.  So now they ignore the taste tests, make bad tasting chips, and trust the people to buy 2x more chips.</p><p>Why should commercial music be any different?  I mean, they just only care if you buy it, so they make what successfully gets people to buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Commercial music is designed for easy marketability , like most other consumer products .
Examples : ( 1 ) Apples exist in numerous different varieties all over the wold .
We do n't eat the best tasting ones , not by far , we eat the ones that still look red after being shipped .
( 2 ) Potato chip companies made chips without added sugar for years because taste tests shows people preferred potato chips without sugar .
But then some clever bastard noticed that people eat more chips if they add sugar .
So now they ignore the taste tests , make bad tasting chips , and trust the people to buy 2x more chips.Why should commercial music be any different ?
I mean , they just only care if you buy it , so they make what successfully gets people to buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Commercial music is designed for easy marketability, like most other consumer products.
Examples :(1) Apples exist in numerous different varieties all over the wold.
We don't eat the best tasting ones, not by far, we eat the ones that still look red after being shipped.
(2) Potato chip companies made chips without added sugar for years because taste tests shows people preferred potato chips without sugar.
But then some clever bastard noticed that people eat more chips if they add sugar.
So now they ignore the taste tests, make bad tasting chips, and trust the people to buy 2x more chips.Why should commercial music be any different?
I mean, they just only care if you buy it, so they make what successfully gets people to buy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217649</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244127600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's <b>McGrift</b>, the Anti-Piracy Dog!</p><p>"Help take a byte out of piracy!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's McGrift , the Anti-Piracy Dog !
" Help take a byte out of piracy !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's McGrift, the Anti-Piracy Dog!
"Help take a byte out of piracy!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214875</id>
	<title>Wrong way</title>
	<author>greyline</author>
	<datestamp>1244109420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the MPA is just barking up the wrong tree here</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the MPA is just barking up the wrong tree here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the MPA is just barking up the wrong tree here</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215017</id>
	<title>Re:Let Me Guess . . .</title>
	<author>fluffernutter</author>
	<datestamp>1244110260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..or maybe 101 * 35,000 = 3,535,000 Dalmatians?</htmltext>
<tokenext>..or maybe 101 * 35,000 = 3,535,000 Dalmatians ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..or maybe 101 * 35,000 = 3,535,000 Dalmatians?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214861</id>
	<title>time to pack discs in coffee grounds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess it's time to pack discs in coffee grounds.</p><p>And for the pirates....to buy shitloads of blanks and place them all over to throw the sniffing dogs off their trail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it 's time to pack discs in coffee grounds.And for the pirates....to buy shitloads of blanks and place them all over to throw the sniffing dogs off their trail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it's time to pack discs in coffee grounds.And for the pirates....to buy shitloads of blanks and place them all over to throw the sniffing dogs off their trail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214807</id>
	<title>Misleading summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dogs don't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out "Pirate!" or "Legit.".  The dogs smell out optical discs and thats it.  Then they take the dogs and go to a shipment/warehouse/whatever that isn't supposed to have any discs in it, and let the dog loose.  If they find discs, chances are the discs are illegal in some way.  And it turns out that people who smuggle pirated copies don't have them clearly marked on their manifest.</p><p>So yeah, the dogs find discs.  Officials check to see if there are supposed to be discs here.  If not, they probably just sniffed out illegal discs.  You know, because if they were legal discs, you'd just put them on the manifest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dogs do n't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out " Pirate !
" or " Legit. " .
The dogs smell out optical discs and thats it .
Then they take the dogs and go to a shipment/warehouse/whatever that is n't supposed to have any discs in it , and let the dog loose .
If they find discs , chances are the discs are illegal in some way .
And it turns out that people who smuggle pirated copies do n't have them clearly marked on their manifest.So yeah , the dogs find discs .
Officials check to see if there are supposed to be discs here .
If not , they probably just sniffed out illegal discs .
You know , because if they were legal discs , you 'd just put them on the manifest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dogs don't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out "Pirate!
" or "Legit.".
The dogs smell out optical discs and thats it.
Then they take the dogs and go to a shipment/warehouse/whatever that isn't supposed to have any discs in it, and let the dog loose.
If they find discs, chances are the discs are illegal in some way.
And it turns out that people who smuggle pirated copies don't have them clearly marked on their manifest.So yeah, the dogs find discs.
Officials check to see if there are supposed to be discs here.
If not, they probably just sniffed out illegal discs.
You know, because if they were legal discs, you'd just put them on the manifest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones....  Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.  If they smell a trace of polycarbonate, e.g. a dozen DVDs, that's not suspicious.  If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse isn't a disc manufacturing company, a computer company, or a computer/movie/music store, such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt there 's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones.... Chances are , they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place .
If they smell a trace of polycarbonate , e.g .
a dozen DVDs , that 's not suspicious .
If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse is n't a disc manufacturing company , a computer company , or a computer/movie/music store , such a high concentration of media in one place screams " professional pirates " ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones....  Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.
If they smell a trace of polycarbonate, e.g.
a dozen DVDs, that's not suspicious.
If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse isn't a disc manufacturing company, a computer company, or a computer/movie/music store, such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214977</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1244109960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are Irish Labrador good seeing eye dogs?<br>So breeds aren't very good at the job</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are Irish Labrador good seeing eye dogs ? So breeds are n't very good at the job</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are Irish Labrador good seeing eye dogs?So breeds aren't very good at the job</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214885</id>
	<title>Not from the onion?</title>
	<author>Jasper\_\_unique\_dammi</author>
	<datestamp>1244109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, the dog cannot smell the difference between copyright infringement, and regular baked CDs. (Often mistaken with piracy, despite the lack of taking ships with the use of force and the lack of raping.)

This looks like they just made a premise to allow them police to search any house which happens to have written to rw cds/dvds, however, the bbc story implies that these dogs are for searching for more mass-production of cd/dvd writing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the dog can not smell the difference between copyright infringement , and regular baked CDs .
( Often mistaken with piracy , despite the lack of taking ships with the use of force and the lack of raping .
) This looks like they just made a premise to allow them police to search any house which happens to have written to rw cds/dvds , however , the bbc story implies that these dogs are for searching for more mass-production of cd/dvd writing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the dog cannot smell the difference between copyright infringement, and regular baked CDs.
(Often mistaken with piracy, despite the lack of taking ships with the use of force and the lack of raping.
)

This looks like they just made a premise to allow them police to search any house which happens to have written to rw cds/dvds, however, the bbc story implies that these dogs are for searching for more mass-production of cd/dvd writing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215621</id>
	<title>I have a question,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do burned ones smell different than blank ones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do burned ones smell different than blank ones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do burned ones smell different than blank ones?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28226877</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r "R"rrrrrr</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1244235480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the death threat against the dogs that outed a cache of discs in CHina last year? (or 2007?)</p><p>Well, i'm surprised that we haven't news reports that fake caches filled with cyanide burned out Woofie's nose...</p><p>OTOH, why bother with CN... that could get the global authorities REALLY pissed off. Instead, put dogphrodesiacs in the boxes, and give "man's best friend" a case of the woodies...  Stiff, leaking dogs won't look good in public, and they'll leave stains on packages and the delivery agents will have to wear gloves and keep the boxes off their uniforms...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the death threat against the dogs that outed a cache of discs in CHina last year ?
( or 2007 ?
) Well , i 'm surprised that we have n't news reports that fake caches filled with cyanide burned out Woofie 's nose...OTOH , why bother with CN... that could get the global authorities REALLY pissed off .
Instead , put dogphrodesiacs in the boxes , and give " man 's best friend " a case of the woodies... Stiff , leaking dogs wo n't look good in public , and they 'll leave stains on packages and the delivery agents will have to wear gloves and keep the boxes off their uniforms.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the death threat against the dogs that outed a cache of discs in CHina last year?
(or 2007?
)Well, i'm surprised that we haven't news reports that fake caches filled with cyanide burned out Woofie's nose...OTOH, why bother with CN... that could get the global authorities REALLY pissed off.
Instead, put dogphrodesiacs in the boxes, and give "man's best friend" a case of the woodies...  Stiff, leaking dogs won't look good in public, and they'll leave stains on packages and the delivery agents will have to wear gloves and keep the boxes off their uniforms...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214793</id>
	<title>More reason to support piracy!</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1244109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If everyone stops buying and producing pirated DVDs, the dogs will no longer be useful and MPA will kill them to save on dog food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone stops buying and producing pirated DVDs , the dogs will no longer be useful and MPA will kill them to save on dog food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone stops buying and producing pirated DVDs, the dogs will no longer be useful and MPA will kill them to save on dog food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215037</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1244110380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are trained to smell Sharpie pen ink. So don't label your DVD rips!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are trained to smell Sharpie pen ink .
So do n't label your DVD rips !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are trained to smell Sharpie pen ink.
So don't label your DVD rips!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220383</id>
	<title>Re:Mod me down, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244205360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well yeah, but it's easier for people to rant about "civil liberties", "fuck tha MPAA", "I burn DVDs so imma criminal omg wtf lol?"</p><p>Welcome to Slashdot, where crime is OK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well yeah , but it 's easier for people to rant about " civil liberties " , " fuck tha MPAA " , " I burn DVDs so imma criminal omg wtf lol ?
" Welcome to Slashdot , where crime is OK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well yeah, but it's easier for people to rant about "civil liberties", "fuck tha MPAA", "I burn DVDs so imma criminal omg wtf lol?
"Welcome to Slashdot, where crime is OK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225057</id>
	<title>Re:35,000 is not "huge"</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1244226720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must live in a different space than me.  3x6x5 inches for me comes out to 90 <b>cubic</b> inches.  But thanks for visiting our plane of existence!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must live in a different space than me .
3x6x5 inches for me comes out to 90 cubic inches .
But thanks for visiting our plane of existence !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must live in a different space than me.
3x6x5 inches for me comes out to 90 cubic inches.
But thanks for visiting our plane of existence!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224861</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Slashdot,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244226000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's OK that they use their entire userbase as beta(alpha?)testers. We're coders after all, we can handle being on bleeding edge. But then they should be prepared to revert to stable as soon as it breaks browsing, and they clearly aren't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's OK that they use their entire userbase as beta ( alpha ? ) testers .
We 're coders after all , we can handle being on bleeding edge .
But then they should be prepared to revert to stable as soon as it breaks browsing , and they clearly are n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's OK that they use their entire userbase as beta(alpha?)testers.
We're coders after all, we can handle being on bleeding edge.
But then they should be prepared to revert to stable as soon as it breaks browsing, and they clearly aren't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215353</id>
	<title>Well,</title>
	<author>James Skarzinskas</author>
	<datestamp>1244111820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's funny, because my dog's trained to sniff out bullshit.  She's getting really yappy right about now, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's funny , because my dog 's trained to sniff out bullshit .
She 's getting really yappy right about now , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's funny, because my dog's trained to sniff out bullshit.
She's getting really yappy right about now, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218147</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>ctmurray</author>
	<datestamp>1244133480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that bratwurst is doggie cocaine (at least judging my dog's response and your post).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that bratwurst is doggie cocaine ( at least judging my dog 's response and your post ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that bratwurst is doggie cocaine (at least judging my dog's response and your post).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215599</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many cd's the dog got wrong . I bet the dog is just a bullshit tactic that has no merit..<br>just my opinion<br>just bring the dog to a suspects warehouse and let him bark<br>gotcha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many cd 's the dog got wrong .
I bet the dog is just a bullshit tactic that has no merit..just my opinionjust bring the dog to a suspects warehouse and let him barkgotcha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many cd's the dog got wrong .
I bet the dog is just a bullshit tactic that has no merit..just my opinionjust bring the dog to a suspects warehouse and let him barkgotcha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216389</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1244117640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With piracy as abundant as it is, a working business model to sell ice to eskimos is understandably hard to develop.  If your competition was stealing your customers with illegal tactics, would you A) lower your prices and take the loss, B) close up shop and work at McDonald's, or C) rat the bastards out.</p><p>And the last thing MAFIAA-bashers should complain about is how they treat pirates that press and resell illegitimate media copies!  That is absolutely undeniable theft that benefits nobody except the thieves.</p><p>Sure they've crossed the line on many occasions, but that's how all corporations fight competition on a routine basis.  Cry about it all you want, neither their unscrupulous legal practices nor their ensuing unpopularity compromises their copyrights.  Sooner or later you won't be able to pirate anything with any reasonable ease.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With piracy as abundant as it is , a working business model to sell ice to eskimos is understandably hard to develop .
If your competition was stealing your customers with illegal tactics , would you A ) lower your prices and take the loss , B ) close up shop and work at McDonald 's , or C ) rat the bastards out.And the last thing MAFIAA-bashers should complain about is how they treat pirates that press and resell illegitimate media copies !
That is absolutely undeniable theft that benefits nobody except the thieves.Sure they 've crossed the line on many occasions , but that 's how all corporations fight competition on a routine basis .
Cry about it all you want , neither their unscrupulous legal practices nor their ensuing unpopularity compromises their copyrights .
Sooner or later you wo n't be able to pirate anything with any reasonable ease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With piracy as abundant as it is, a working business model to sell ice to eskimos is understandably hard to develop.
If your competition was stealing your customers with illegal tactics, would you A) lower your prices and take the loss, B) close up shop and work at McDonald's, or C) rat the bastards out.And the last thing MAFIAA-bashers should complain about is how they treat pirates that press and resell illegitimate media copies!
That is absolutely undeniable theft that benefits nobody except the thieves.Sure they've crossed the line on many occasions, but that's how all corporations fight competition on a routine basis.
Cry about it all you want, neither their unscrupulous legal practices nor their ensuing unpopularity compromises their copyrights.
Sooner or later you won't be able to pirate anything with any reasonable ease.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673</id>
	<title>Steak.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I plan to coat all of my real DVD's in steak, that should distract 'em!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I plan to coat all of my real DVD 's in steak , that should distract 'em !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I plan to coat all of my real DVD's in steak, that should distract 'em!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215707</id>
	<title>Just goes to show...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...dogs like to smell excrement.  How fitting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...dogs like to smell excrement .
How fitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...dogs like to smell excrement.
How fitting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216059</id>
	<title>Note to myself: keep pepper-spray ...</title>
	<author>porky\_pig\_jr</author>
	<datestamp>1244115600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>next to my vast DVD collection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>next to my vast DVD collection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>next to my vast DVD collection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215685</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, they smell different! Try it!</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1244113440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure CD-Rs and pressed CDs would smell different...  but I was under the impression that the large-scale piracy operations pressed their disks just like the legitimate ones.  The article doesn't say either way.  But if it's true that they were pressed, them I'm betting the other slashdotters were right who said that the dog simply sniffed out large quantities of optical media, and once found check to see if it belongs there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure CD-Rs and pressed CDs would smell different... but I was under the impression that the large-scale piracy operations pressed their disks just like the legitimate ones .
The article does n't say either way .
But if it 's true that they were pressed , them I 'm betting the other slashdotters were right who said that the dog simply sniffed out large quantities of optical media , and once found check to see if it belongs there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure CD-Rs and pressed CDs would smell different...  but I was under the impression that the large-scale piracy operations pressed their disks just like the legitimate ones.
The article doesn't say either way.
But if it's true that they were pressed, them I'm betting the other slashdotters were right who said that the dog simply sniffed out large quantities of optical media, and once found check to see if it belongs there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225107</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, they smell different! Try it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course blank/burned and pressed discs have different smells. That wasn't the claim. The claim was that "dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates". Are you suggesting that all DVD&#xb1;Rs are pirated?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course blank/burned and pressed discs have different smells .
That was n't the claim .
The claim was that " dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates " .
Are you suggesting that all DVD   Rs are pirated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course blank/burned and pressed discs have different smells.
That wasn't the claim.
The claim was that "dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates".
Are you suggesting that all DVD±Rs are pirated?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216909</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>pembo13</author>
	<datestamp>1244120580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating it</p></div><p>Yes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating itYes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating itYes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214697</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, because clearly if the police didn't train them for this, they'd be out training dogs for the handicapped. Society obviously works this way. As a species we're incapable of doing two things at once. Troll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , because clearly if the police did n't train them for this , they 'd be out training dogs for the handicapped .
Society obviously works this way .
As a species we 're incapable of doing two things at once .
Troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, because clearly if the police didn't train them for this, they'd be out training dogs for the handicapped.
Society obviously works this way.
As a species we're incapable of doing two things at once.
Troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222121</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Slashdot,</title>
	<author>jra</author>
	<datestamp>1244215620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could you vague that up for us?</p><p>(Or would I understand if I hung out here more, to the exclusion of an actual life?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could you vague that up for us ?
( Or would I understand if I hung out here more , to the exclusion of an actual life ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could you vague that up for us?
(Or would I understand if I hung out here more, to the exclusion of an actual life?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217991</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>apostrophesemicolon</author>
	<datestamp>1244131680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>in related news,<br>a blind person was killed Tuesday night with two bullet wounds on his head.  Watts Witham, 32, was found dead near a suspected pirated CD factory.  His guide dog, Serpico, apparently was guiding him for an evening stroll when it sniffed the pirated CD chemicals emanating out of the factory.  Unbeknownst to Mr. Witham, Serpico followed the scent and as the pirates found out of Mr. Witham's presence, they murdered him and dumped his body nearby.<br><br>This was the second incident after an Anonymous Coward suggested on an internet forum that "we can do both" train dogs as sniffing agents and guide dogs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>in related news,a blind person was killed Tuesday night with two bullet wounds on his head .
Watts Witham , 32 , was found dead near a suspected pirated CD factory .
His guide dog , Serpico , apparently was guiding him for an evening stroll when it sniffed the pirated CD chemicals emanating out of the factory .
Unbeknownst to Mr. Witham , Serpico followed the scent and as the pirates found out of Mr. Witham 's presence , they murdered him and dumped his body nearby.This was the second incident after an Anonymous Coward suggested on an internet forum that " we can do both " train dogs as sniffing agents and guide dogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in related news,a blind person was killed Tuesday night with two bullet wounds on his head.
Watts Witham, 32, was found dead near a suspected pirated CD factory.
His guide dog, Serpico, apparently was guiding him for an evening stroll when it sniffed the pirated CD chemicals emanating out of the factory.
Unbeknownst to Mr. Witham, Serpico followed the scent and as the pirates found out of Mr. Witham's presence, they murdered him and dumped his body nearby.This was the second incident after an Anonymous Coward suggested on an internet forum that "we can do both" train dogs as sniffing agents and guide dogs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327</id>
	<title>Yes, they smell different! Try it!</title>
	<author>jriskin</author>
	<datestamp>1244111640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just opened a spool of CD-R's, DVD-Rs, and compared them to Pressed DVD/CD's. The burned disks are QUITE STRONG in oder and its EASY to tell the difference even between CD-R and DVD-R at least with the disks I'm smelling. While they may have trained the dogs to smell for all of it, the dogs nose is WAY more sensitive than mine and I can easily distinguish after smelling a few.</p><p>Dogs would have ZERO problem telling them apart. It should be fairly trivial to give dogs a sampling of various burned media and then have them sniff them out.</p><p>I'm surprised people even think this is even far fetched. Sound pretty straight forward to me. But, then again i'm practical and the first thing I tried was smelling a bunch of media...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just opened a spool of CD-R 's , DVD-Rs , and compared them to Pressed DVD/CD 's .
The burned disks are QUITE STRONG in oder and its EASY to tell the difference even between CD-R and DVD-R at least with the disks I 'm smelling .
While they may have trained the dogs to smell for all of it , the dogs nose is WAY more sensitive than mine and I can easily distinguish after smelling a few.Dogs would have ZERO problem telling them apart .
It should be fairly trivial to give dogs a sampling of various burned media and then have them sniff them out.I 'm surprised people even think this is even far fetched .
Sound pretty straight forward to me .
But , then again i 'm practical and the first thing I tried was smelling a bunch of media.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just opened a spool of CD-R's, DVD-Rs, and compared them to Pressed DVD/CD's.
The burned disks are QUITE STRONG in oder and its EASY to tell the difference even between CD-R and DVD-R at least with the disks I'm smelling.
While they may have trained the dogs to smell for all of it, the dogs nose is WAY more sensitive than mine and I can easily distinguish after smelling a few.Dogs would have ZERO problem telling them apart.
It should be fairly trivial to give dogs a sampling of various burned media and then have them sniff them out.I'm surprised people even think this is even far fetched.
Sound pretty straight forward to me.
But, then again i'm practical and the first thing I tried was smelling a bunch of media...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217945</id>
	<title>The new NIPPER</title>
	<author>zazenation</author>
	<datestamp>1244131020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PADDY is the MPAA's twisted version of the RCA dog, NIPPER.<br>Have an image with Paddy inquisitively staring at a huge pallet of authentic MPAA DVDs with the logo:<br>"His Master's Profit"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PADDY is the MPAA 's twisted version of the RCA dog , NIPPER.Have an image with Paddy inquisitively staring at a huge pallet of authentic MPAA DVDs with the logo : " His Master 's Profit "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PADDY is the MPAA's twisted version of the RCA dog, NIPPER.Have an image with Paddy inquisitively staring at a huge pallet of authentic MPAA DVDs with the logo:"His Master's Profit"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214799</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>i kan reed</author>
	<datestamp>1244109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating it.  That is the worst possible justification of piracy ever.  Besides these are people selling fraudulent copies.  Real album covers, real stores, real money.  Their goal is to make money off of work they did not create.  It's slimy and evil, and they have no sympathy from me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating it .
That is the worst possible justification of piracy ever .
Besides these are people selling fraudulent copies .
Real album covers , real stores , real money .
Their goal is to make money off of work they did not create .
It 's slimy and evil , and they have no sympathy from me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the problem were seriously bad music would be people be pirating it.
That is the worst possible justification of piracy ever.
Besides these are people selling fraudulent copies.
Real album covers, real stores, real money.
Their goal is to make money off of work they did not create.
It's slimy and evil, and they have no sympathy from me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217805</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244129640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dogs can smell the distinct odor of the bits of an MKV header obviously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dogs can smell the distinct odor of the bits of an MKV header obviously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dogs can smell the distinct odor of the bits of an MKV header obviously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217907</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1244130780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know of 2 drug dogs the USAF had that were 'retired' because of false positives.<br> <br>

One was a chocoholic and would alert on anything that had chocolate.<br> <br>

The other was a lunchgut that would alert on anything with food when he got hungry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know of 2 drug dogs the USAF had that were 'retired ' because of false positives .
One was a chocoholic and would alert on anything that had chocolate .
The other was a lunchgut that would alert on anything with food when he got hungry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know of 2 drug dogs the USAF had that were 'retired' because of false positives.
One was a chocoholic and would alert on anything that had chocolate.
The other was a lunchgut that would alert on anything with food when he got hungry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</id>
	<title>Dear Slashdot,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>+----------+<br>| FIX YOUR |<br>|&nbsp; FUCKIN' |<br>|&nbsp; &nbsp;CODE&nbsp; &nbsp;|<br>+----------+<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; |&nbsp; |<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; |&nbsp; |<br>&nbsp;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.\|.||/.. </tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ ---------- + | FIX YOUR | |   FUCKIN ' | |     CODE     | + ---------- +     |   |     |   |   . \ | . | | /. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+----------+| FIX YOUR ||  FUCKIN' ||   CODE   |+----------+    |  |    |  |  .\|.||/.. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28223569</id>
	<title>Pirated Vista DVD?</title>
	<author>motherpusbucket</author>
	<datestamp>1244221140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt a dog could be trained to smell the difference between an original Vista DVD and a pirated one.  The stench of that OS would overcome any media chemical differences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt a dog could be trained to smell the difference between an original Vista DVD and a pirated one .
The stench of that OS would overcome any media chemical differences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt a dog could be trained to smell the difference between an original Vista DVD and a pirated one.
The stench of that OS would overcome any media chemical differences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217621</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Slashdot,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244127120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/8475/slashfail.png" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">SlashFail!</a> [imageshack.us]</p><p>Firefox 3.5b4</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SlashFail !
[ imageshack.us ] Firefox 3.5b4</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SlashFail!
[imageshack.us]Firefox 3.5b4</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220671</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244207760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, I personally don't think copying a movie or a song is a problem. The problem is these little monkey fuckers that do it to make money. They don't deserve the the money...they should work like real people. Whatever you do, don't buy pirated bullshit. Copy that shit from a friend or off the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I personally do n't think copying a movie or a song is a problem .
The problem is these little monkey fuckers that do it to make money .
They do n't deserve the the money...they should work like real people .
Whatever you do , do n't buy pirated bullshit .
Copy that shit from a friend or off the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I personally don't think copying a movie or a song is a problem.
The problem is these little monkey fuckers that do it to make money.
They don't deserve the the money...they should work like real people.
Whatever you do, don't buy pirated bullshit.
Copy that shit from a friend or off the Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215909</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244114820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when a big time counterfeiter presses his DVD (they do) and the dog can sniff out DVD-Rs, who is the target of that operations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when a big time counterfeiter presses his DVD ( they do ) and the dog can sniff out DVD-Rs , who is the target of that operations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when a big time counterfeiter presses his DVD (they do) and the dog can sniff out DVD-Rs, who is the target of that operations?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1244137560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's only a false dilemma if training dogs takes zero resources. The resources to train this DVD-sniffing dog *could* have been used to train this dog to do something benificial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only a false dilemma if training dogs takes zero resources .
The resources to train this DVD-sniffing dog * could * have been used to train this dog to do something benificial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only a false dilemma if training dogs takes zero resources.
The resources to train this DVD-sniffing dog *could* have been used to train this dog to do something benificial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217631</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244127360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The dogs don't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out "Pirate!" or "Legit.".</p></div><p>But how will the dogs determine the difference with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code\_smell" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Microsoft products</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dogs do n't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out " Pirate !
" or " Legit .
" .But how will the dogs determine the difference with Microsoft products [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dogs don't smell the bits on the discs and determine if they spell out "Pirate!
" or "Legit.
".But how will the dogs determine the difference with Microsoft products [wikipedia.org]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217111</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1244122260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dunno, dogs have been trained to <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/01/0112\_060112\_dog\_cancer.html" title="nationalgeographic.com">smell cancer</a> [nationalgeographic.com]. They might be able to smell the difference in the plastic of the disc or the printing if you gave them enough training. My guess is they gave the dogs plenty of examples of the legit discs and pirate discs they were trying to distinguish between. Who knows which smell they used to distinguish between them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , dogs have been trained to smell cancer [ nationalgeographic.com ] .
They might be able to smell the difference in the plastic of the disc or the printing if you gave them enough training .
My guess is they gave the dogs plenty of examples of the legit discs and pirate discs they were trying to distinguish between .
Who knows which smell they used to distinguish between them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, dogs have been trained to smell cancer [nationalgeographic.com].
They might be able to smell the difference in the plastic of the disc or the printing if you gave them enough training.
My guess is they gave the dogs plenty of examples of the legit discs and pirate discs they were trying to distinguish between.
Who knows which smell they used to distinguish between them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219821</id>
	<title>Re:35,000 is not "huge"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244198640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would seem you have "cubic" confused with "square".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would seem you have " cubic " confused with " square " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would seem you have "cubic" confused with "square".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215801</id>
	<title>Grey shift</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244114160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones...</p></div></blockquote><p>They're probably even pressed in the same factories.</p><p>Yeah, of course we only run the lines eight hours a day, our workers need to rest!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt there 's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones...They 're probably even pressed in the same factories.Yeah , of course we only run the lines eight hours a day , our workers need to rest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones...They're probably even pressed in the same factories.Yeah, of course we only run the lines eight hours a day, our workers need to rest!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215345</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>Jartan</author>
	<datestamp>1244111760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can hardly blame them for trying to stop people making actual physical copies for illegal resale.  I'm all for bashing them for their evils but training a dog to sniff out optical media isn't exactly something from the Dr Evil pet tricks handbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can hardly blame them for trying to stop people making actual physical copies for illegal resale .
I 'm all for bashing them for their evils but training a dog to sniff out optical media is n't exactly something from the Dr Evil pet tricks handbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can hardly blame them for trying to stop people making actual physical copies for illegal resale.
I'm all for bashing them for their evils but training a dog to sniff out optical media isn't exactly something from the Dr Evil pet tricks handbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214881</id>
	<title>sex with a 7agorz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>playing so it's IT WIIL BE AMONG if desired, we Towels on the floor</htmltext>
<tokenext>playing so it 's IT WIIL BE AMONG if desired , we Towels on the floor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>playing so it's IT WIIL BE AMONG if desired, we Towels on the floor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214913</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>gstoddart</author>
	<datestamp>1244109600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why would they?</p><p>As you observed, they can already "bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs" -- why change your business model when you can do all of that to prop up the one you have?</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.Why would they ? As you observed , they can already " bribe judges , hire lawyers , buy congress , complain , make commercials and now train dogs " -- why change your business model when you can do all of that to prop up the one you have ? Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.Why would they?As you observed, they can already "bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs" -- why change your business model when you can do all of that to prop up the one you have?Cheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</id>
	<title>So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks?</p><p>How about just data only disks with no movies on them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks ? How about just data only disks with no movies on them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the dog go off on any dvd-r so it will go off even on blank disks?How about just data only disks with no movies on them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214665</id>
	<title>Help! Help! My iPhone 3G is stuck in my butt!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone from Slashdot be kind enough to help me extricate my iPhone 3G from the inside of my anus? Rob Malda shoved it up there and I can't get it to come back out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone from Slashdot be kind enough to help me extricate my iPhone 3G from the inside of my anus ?
Rob Malda shoved it up there and I ca n't get it to come back out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone from Slashdot be kind enough to help me extricate my iPhone 3G from the inside of my anus?
Rob Malda shoved it up there and I can't get it to come back out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28223137</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1244219520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>...or trained to sniff and bark at anybody, in response to a subtle command, that their handler fancied searching.
</p><p>Hey, its what <i>I'd</i> do!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chances are , they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place .
...or trained to sniff and bark at anybody , in response to a subtle command , that their handler fancied searching .
Hey , its what I 'd do !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.
...or trained to sniff and bark at anybody, in response to a subtle command, that their handler fancied searching.
Hey, its what I'd do!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101</id>
	<title>Mod me down, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244110680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...aren't these the guys we \_want\_ the MPAA/RIAA to go after? These are the commercial infringers who are operating outside of the law for profit. I'll be happy to argue with you guys (i.e. - on your side) all day about personal use not being an infringing act, but this - imho - is exactly what the copyright laws are written for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...are n't these the guys we \ _want \ _ the MPAA/RIAA to go after ?
These are the commercial infringers who are operating outside of the law for profit .
I 'll be happy to argue with you guys ( i.e .
- on your side ) all day about personal use not being an infringing act , but this - imho - is exactly what the copyright laws are written for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...aren't these the guys we \_want\_ the MPAA/RIAA to go after?
These are the commercial infringers who are operating outside of the law for profit.
I'll be happy to argue with you guys (i.e.
- on your side) all day about personal use not being an infringing act, but this - imho - is exactly what the copyright laws are written for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214947</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you ever buy a stack of 50-100 DVDs, take the plastic off, and smell the roll......damn its potent...I would be wondering if the chemicals are hazardous for the beast. They sure burnt my sense of smell for a few minutes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ever buy a stack of 50-100 DVDs , take the plastic off , and smell the roll......damn its potent...I would be wondering if the chemicals are hazardous for the beast .
They sure burnt my sense of smell for a few minutes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you ever buy a stack of 50-100 DVDs, take the plastic off, and smell the roll......damn its potent...I would be wondering if the chemicals are hazardous for the beast.
They sure burnt my sense of smell for a few minutes...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217153</id>
	<title>Now they have "proof" in court for citizens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244122620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You guys don't get it. The dog probably can only smell out optical discs and that's it. Once they've nailed a few buildings and established that the dog can indeed sniff out a disc (yet conveniently not prove that it can actually tell the difference between legit and pirated), they move on to the next step.</p><p>All this does is solve that pesky problem of not having a legitimate reason to search a premises.</p><p>The next step is to use these dogs for homes. All they have to do is illegally get the information behind an IP address, which is obviously not usable in court, then bring one of these magical dogs around the house. It'll be pretty easy to trigger the damn thing to start barking at one thing or another, then voila! Warrant!</p><p>It's a play in the bigger game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You guys do n't get it .
The dog probably can only smell out optical discs and that 's it .
Once they 've nailed a few buildings and established that the dog can indeed sniff out a disc ( yet conveniently not prove that it can actually tell the difference between legit and pirated ) , they move on to the next step.All this does is solve that pesky problem of not having a legitimate reason to search a premises.The next step is to use these dogs for homes .
All they have to do is illegally get the information behind an IP address , which is obviously not usable in court , then bring one of these magical dogs around the house .
It 'll be pretty easy to trigger the damn thing to start barking at one thing or another , then voila !
Warrant ! It 's a play in the bigger game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You guys don't get it.
The dog probably can only smell out optical discs and that's it.
Once they've nailed a few buildings and established that the dog can indeed sniff out a disc (yet conveniently not prove that it can actually tell the difference between legit and pirated), they move on to the next step.All this does is solve that pesky problem of not having a legitimate reason to search a premises.The next step is to use these dogs for homes.
All they have to do is illegally get the information behind an IP address, which is obviously not usable in court, then bring one of these magical dogs around the house.
It'll be pretty easy to trigger the damn thing to start barking at one thing or another, then voila!
Warrant!It's a play in the bigger game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215465</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>TheP4st</author>
	<datestamp>1244112480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes, because clearly if the police didn't train them for this, they'd be out training dogs for the handicapped.</p></div><p>The money spent on training the dog to sniff for pirated CD's <i>could</i> have been used for something more useful like, training a dog for a blind person. So yes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , because clearly if the police did n't train them for this , they 'd be out training dogs for the handicapped.The money spent on training the dog to sniff for pirated CD 's could have been used for something more useful like , training a dog for a blind person .
So yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, because clearly if the police didn't train them for this, they'd be out training dogs for the handicapped.The money spent on training the dog to sniff for pirated CD's could have been used for something more useful like, training a dog for a blind person.
So yes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218633</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, they smell different! Try it!</title>
	<author>drizek</author>
	<datestamp>1244138460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the smell goes away after a while, but as I understand it, it is part of some sort of preservative and prevents disc decay. You are supposed to keep the spools closed and wrapped until you are going to actually start burning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the smell goes away after a while , but as I understand it , it is part of some sort of preservative and prevents disc decay .
You are supposed to keep the spools closed and wrapped until you are going to actually start burning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the smell goes away after a while, but as I understand it, it is part of some sort of preservative and prevents disc decay.
You are supposed to keep the spools closed and wrapped until you are going to actually start burning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221429</id>
	<title>akram's razor</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1244212380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"...dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates. From the article, 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses"</p></div><p>Q: How do you teach a dog to detect pirated DVD's in Malaysia?<br>A: Teach dog to bark continuously. Take dog to Malaysia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates .
From the article , 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses " Q : How do you teach a dog to detect pirated DVD 's in Malaysia ? A : Teach dog to bark continuously .
Take dog to Malaysia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...dogs can be trained to tell the difference between a legit copy of a DVD and one from those pesky pirates.
From the article, 'A DVD-sniffing anti-piracy dog named Paddy has uncovered a huge cache of 35,000 discs in Malaysian warehouses"Q: How do you teach a dog to detect pirated DVD's in Malaysia?A: Teach dog to bark continuously.
Take dog to Malaysia.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225017</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>kaatochacha</author>
	<datestamp>1244226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's the MPAAs money. And they probably aren't in business to help the blind.
That's like saying "The money spent by the rich guy on his yacht could have been better spent on helping the poor".
Yes, that might be true.
But odds are, that rich guy isn't going to spend it on the poor if he doesn't buy the yacht.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's the MPAAs money .
And they probably are n't in business to help the blind .
That 's like saying " The money spent by the rich guy on his yacht could have been better spent on helping the poor " .
Yes , that might be true .
But odds are , that rich guy is n't going to spend it on the poor if he does n't buy the yacht .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's the MPAAs money.
And they probably aren't in business to help the blind.
That's like saying "The money spent by the rich guy on his yacht could have been better spent on helping the poor".
Yes, that might be true.
But odds are, that rich guy isn't going to spend it on the poor if he doesn't buy the yacht.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218825</id>
	<title>Re:Steak.</title>
	<author>Fotograf</author>
	<datestamp>1244140920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I plan to coat all of my real DVD's in steak, that should attract 'em! Oh wait. Nvm.


here fixed for ya</htmltext>
<tokenext>I plan to coat all of my real DVD 's in steak , that should attract 'em !
Oh wait .
Nvm . here fixed for ya</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I plan to coat all of my real DVD's in steak, that should attract 'em!
Oh wait.
Nvm.


here fixed for ya</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216069</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1244115660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This sort of "search" crap is beyond stupid. Either search something, or don't, but don't pretend that your "search dog", who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia, is justification for doing so.</i></p><p>Look I get what you're saying and I agree with your point, but that's no reason to hate on some perfectly fine hobbies.  They aren't my hobbies, though they would be if I was more flexible.  And if the police officer who conducted the search with a legitimate warrant happens to have an auto-fellatio hobby, well, I just don't see how that affects their ability to perform their job!  If anything they'd be less uptight...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sort of " search " crap is beyond stupid .
Either search something , or do n't , but do n't pretend that your " search dog " , who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia , is justification for doing so.Look I get what you 're saying and I agree with your point , but that 's no reason to hate on some perfectly fine hobbies .
They are n't my hobbies , though they would be if I was more flexible .
And if the police officer who conducted the search with a legitimate warrant happens to have an auto-fellatio hobby , well , I just do n't see how that affects their ability to perform their job !
If anything they 'd be less uptight.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sort of "search" crap is beyond stupid.
Either search something, or don't, but don't pretend that your "search dog", who in his/her downtime has hobbies that include sniffing and licking his/her own genitalia, is justification for doing so.Look I get what you're saying and I agree with your point, but that's no reason to hate on some perfectly fine hobbies.
They aren't my hobbies, though they would be if I was more flexible.
And if the police officer who conducted the search with a legitimate warrant happens to have an auto-fellatio hobby, well, I just don't see how that affects their ability to perform their job!
If anything they'd be less uptight...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219049</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244143860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the dye that they are probably smelling, not the poly.  Dye has a smell.  It goes to the outer hub.  Replicates are pressed/stamped and do not have any of the various dye-type smells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the dye that they are probably smelling , not the poly .
Dye has a smell .
It goes to the outer hub .
Replicates are pressed/stamped and do not have any of the various dye-type smells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the dye that they are probably smelling, not the poly.
Dye has a smell.
It goes to the outer hub.
Replicates are pressed/stamped and do not have any of the various dye-type smells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214887</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>MoonBuggy</author>
	<datestamp>1244109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds like the most plausible option. If you read the BBC article from the older story it's very clear that they couldn't tell the difference between burned and pressed discs (which I found a little surprising, actually, with all the chemicals in the dye of DVD-Rs) and even if they have improved on their training since then, I wouldn't expect 35,000 discs to be burned anyway.</p><p>Like you said, I'm assuming they went sniffing around the warehouse marked "Completely Legal Food Co." and found that the crates of bananas smelled like a whole lot of polycarbonate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds like the most plausible option .
If you read the BBC article from the older story it 's very clear that they could n't tell the difference between burned and pressed discs ( which I found a little surprising , actually , with all the chemicals in the dye of DVD-Rs ) and even if they have improved on their training since then , I would n't expect 35,000 discs to be burned anyway.Like you said , I 'm assuming they went sniffing around the warehouse marked " Completely Legal Food Co. " and found that the crates of bananas smelled like a whole lot of polycarbonate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds like the most plausible option.
If you read the BBC article from the older story it's very clear that they couldn't tell the difference between burned and pressed discs (which I found a little surprising, actually, with all the chemicals in the dye of DVD-Rs) and even if they have improved on their training since then, I wouldn't expect 35,000 discs to be burned anyway.Like you said, I'm assuming they went sniffing around the warehouse marked "Completely Legal Food Co." and found that the crates of bananas smelled like a whole lot of polycarbonate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214647</id>
	<title>First post</title>
	<author>nomorecwrd</author>
	<datestamp>1244108460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I smell a first post.<br>
Sorry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I smell a first post .
Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smell a first post.
Sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28233301</id>
	<title>While you are at it ... fix the subject lines too!</title>
	<author>freaker\_TuC</author>
	<datestamp>1244305440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just like the post button has a big butt; other posts subject lines show <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1252973&amp;cid=28179177" title="slashdot.org">white text on a white</a> [slashdot.org] background... <p>

<b>Not very readable for most of us!</b> </p><p>

Or do we need to hack every browser in order to read Slashdot?...
<br>
Thank you for your understanding<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

</p><p>---<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. citizen 7632, posted on Firefox (newest stable edition).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like the post button has a big butt ; other posts subject lines show white text on a white [ slashdot.org ] background.. . Not very readable for most of us !
Or do we need to hack every browser in order to read Slashdot ? .. .
Thank you for your understanding ; ) --- / .
citizen 7632 , posted on Firefox ( newest stable edition ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like the post button has a big butt; other posts subject lines show white text on a white [slashdot.org] background... 

Not very readable for most of us!
Or do we need to hack every browser in order to read Slashdot?...
Thank you for your understanding ;)

--- /.
citizen 7632, posted on Firefox (newest stable edition).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216337</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1244117220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, dogs are used to sniffing around huge piles of shit anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , dogs are used to sniffing around huge piles of shit anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, dogs are used to sniffing around huge piles of shit anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215633</id>
	<title>Re:Misconception</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bingo - that's exactly what they do. The BBC has been covering these dogs for a few years now.</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern\_ireland/7275060.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern\_ireland/7275060.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk] </p><blockquote><div><p>They are trained to sniff out a chemical used in disc production, but cannot distinguish between real and the pirated DVDs. What they can do is point officers in their raids to hidden caches of discs.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hit the "See Also" section on the right for earlier stories and more details.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo - that 's exactly what they do .
The BBC has been covering these dogs for a few years now.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern \ _ireland/7275060.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] They are trained to sniff out a chemical used in disc production , but can not distinguish between real and the pirated DVDs .
What they can do is point officers in their raids to hidden caches of discs.Hit the " See Also " section on the right for earlier stories and more details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo - that's exactly what they do.
The BBC has been covering these dogs for a few years now.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern\_ireland/7275060.stm [bbc.co.uk] They are trained to sniff out a chemical used in disc production, but cannot distinguish between real and the pirated DVDs.
What they can do is point officers in their raids to hidden caches of discs.Hit the "See Also" section on the right for earlier stories and more details.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216165</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>siloko</author>
	<datestamp>1244116260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The dogs aren't stolen from the guide dog pool they are just narco grunts set loose on suspicios warehouses because as we know Intellectual Propery Theives are in cahoots with drug dealers, murderers and terrorists . . . and probably Somalian Pirates too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dogs are n't stolen from the guide dog pool they are just narco grunts set loose on suspicios warehouses because as we know Intellectual Propery Theives are in cahoots with drug dealers , murderers and terrorists .
. .
and probably Somalian Pirates too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dogs aren't stolen from the guide dog pool they are just narco grunts set loose on suspicios warehouses because as we know Intellectual Propery Theives are in cahoots with drug dealers, murderers and terrorists .
. .
and probably Somalian Pirates too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214735</id>
	<title>works in countries</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1244108820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>that hop into bed with the RIAA and MPAA, but i dont see china or other countries allowing this anytime soon.
<br> <br>
we're also assuming there is readable evidence on the disks which is not, say, encrypted by GPG.
<br> <br>
i thought we all used torrents these days anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>that hop into bed with the RIAA and MPAA , but i dont see china or other countries allowing this anytime soon .
we 're also assuming there is readable evidence on the disks which is not , say , encrypted by GPG .
i thought we all used torrents these days anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that hop into bed with the RIAA and MPAA, but i dont see china or other countries allowing this anytime soon.
we're also assuming there is readable evidence on the disks which is not, say, encrypted by GPG.
i thought we all used torrents these days anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220729</id>
	<title>Hey!</title>
	<author>De-Jean7777</author>
	<datestamp>1244208240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can hear the dogs outside...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can hear the dogs outside.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can hear the dogs outside...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215059</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244110500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, so if it's an anti-piracy dog, can it go "Arrrf"?<br> <br>Does it like sniffing arrrses like most dogs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , so if it 's an anti-piracy dog , can it go " Arrrf " ?
Does it like sniffing arrrses like most dogs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, so if it's an anti-piracy dog, can it go "Arrrf"?
Does it like sniffing arrrses like most dogs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216073</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244115660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all we need to do is to train dogs to sniff data packets on the network and piracy will be gone!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need to do is to train dogs to sniff data packets on the network and piracy will be gone !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need to do is to train dogs to sniff data packets on the network and piracy will be gone!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217145</id>
	<title>Seal and Wash</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1244122500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just get yourself a vacuum bag sealer, then wash the bags in a washing machine with bleach for 30 minutes. Dogs wont smell shit even if put right up to their nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just get yourself a vacuum bag sealer , then wash the bags in a washing machine with bleach for 30 minutes .
Dogs wont smell shit even if put right up to their nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just get yourself a vacuum bag sealer, then wash the bags in a washing machine with bleach for 30 minutes.
Dogs wont smell shit even if put right up to their nose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215939</id>
	<title>Re:More reason to support piracy!</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244115000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of the doggies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the doggies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the doggies!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216097</id>
	<title>BAWWWWW they don't want us stealing</title>
	<author>johncandale</author>
	<datestamp>1244115840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because we should be able to reprint books, movies cd's and stock pile 35,000 discs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because we should be able to reprint books , movies cd 's and stock pile 35,000 discs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because we should be able to reprint books, movies cd's and stock pile 35,000 discs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216083</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, they smell different! Try it!</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1244115780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These dogs are apparantly able to tell the difference between 'pirate' disks and legit ones.  I'm sure a legit CDR smells much like a CDR containing 'pirate' music files.</p><p>I imagine what's actually happening is that to sort of badly-disguise the fact that the 'pirate' disks have been seized via illegal email/phone tapping or tip-offs from disgruntled/rival criminals, the authorities have come up with this horseshit story, which some people appear to be taking seriously...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These dogs are apparantly able to tell the difference between 'pirate ' disks and legit ones .
I 'm sure a legit CDR smells much like a CDR containing 'pirate ' music files.I imagine what 's actually happening is that to sort of badly-disguise the fact that the 'pirate ' disks have been seized via illegal email/phone tapping or tip-offs from disgruntled/rival criminals , the authorities have come up with this horseshit story , which some people appear to be taking seriously.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These dogs are apparantly able to tell the difference between 'pirate' disks and legit ones.
I'm sure a legit CDR smells much like a CDR containing 'pirate' music files.I imagine what's actually happening is that to sort of badly-disguise the fact that the 'pirate' disks have been seized via illegal email/phone tapping or tip-offs from disgruntled/rival criminals, the authorities have come up with this horseshit story, which some people appear to be taking seriously...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218963</id>
	<title>Re:Smells like a made up story...</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1244142600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I laughed my ass off.  Piracy does not have a smell.  The only thing that dog could be smelling is the difference between a recordable CD/DVD and a "pressed" CD/DVD.  Maybe the labels.  That's it.  All of which is perfectly legal, and has many, many, many legal instances of its use.</p><p>There is no chemical associated with Piracy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>That dog would just as easily start barking at a Fry's electronics, as it would a couple that put their baby pictures onto DVD, and just as it would some evil pirate burning his illicit stash of "stolen" 1's and 0's.</p><p>But hey, let's throw logic and common sense out the window!!</p><p>The MPAA has Digital Pirate Booty sniffing dogs!  Don't get through the airports now with your illegally obtained MP3's burned to CD's!  The Jig is UP!</p><p>LOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I laughed my ass off .
Piracy does not have a smell .
The only thing that dog could be smelling is the difference between a recordable CD/DVD and a " pressed " CD/DVD .
Maybe the labels .
That 's it .
All of which is perfectly legal , and has many , many , many legal instances of its use.There is no chemical associated with Piracy : ) That dog would just as easily start barking at a Fry 's electronics , as it would a couple that put their baby pictures onto DVD , and just as it would some evil pirate burning his illicit stash of " stolen " 1 's and 0 's.But hey , let 's throw logic and common sense out the window !
! The MPAA has Digital Pirate Booty sniffing dogs !
Do n't get through the airports now with your illegally obtained MP3 's burned to CD 's !
The Jig is UP ! LOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I laughed my ass off.
Piracy does not have a smell.
The only thing that dog could be smelling is the difference between a recordable CD/DVD and a "pressed" CD/DVD.
Maybe the labels.
That's it.
All of which is perfectly legal, and has many, many, many legal instances of its use.There is no chemical associated with Piracy :)That dog would just as easily start barking at a Fry's electronics, as it would a couple that put their baby pictures onto DVD, and just as it would some evil pirate burning his illicit stash of "stolen" 1's and 0's.But hey, let's throw logic and common sense out the window!
!The MPAA has Digital Pirate Booty sniffing dogs!
Don't get through the airports now with your illegally obtained MP3's burned to CD's!
The Jig is UP!LOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221871</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>SoulRider</author>
	<datestamp>1244214360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the problem, the fact that the people who run the industry have turned it into a business model.  Its not about the love of music anymore or trying to bring music to the masses, its all become an MBAs wet dream.  The whole industry has become a heartless, soulless and mindless money making ponzi scheme.  That is why it is incapable of producing anything of merit anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the problem , the fact that the people who run the industry have turned it into a business model .
Its not about the love of music anymore or trying to bring music to the masses , its all become an MBAs wet dream .
The whole industry has become a heartless , soulless and mindless money making ponzi scheme .
That is why it is incapable of producing anything of merit anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the problem, the fact that the people who run the industry have turned it into a business model.
Its not about the love of music anymore or trying to bring music to the masses, its all become an MBAs wet dream.
The whole industry has become a heartless, soulless and mindless money making ponzi scheme.
That is why it is incapable of producing anything of merit anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215283</id>
	<title>What about the real pirates</title>
	<author>penguin\_dance</author>
	<datestamp>1244111460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't they train these dogs to hunt down some REAL pirates.</p><p>Oh, I forgot, <a href="http://www.nation.co.ke/News/africa/-/1066/606788/-/139ybxuz/-/" title="nation.co.ke">THOSE</a> [nation.co.ke] they just capture, then release!</p><p>Damn, governments are stupid....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't they train these dogs to hunt down some REAL pirates.Oh , I forgot , THOSE [ nation.co.ke ] they just capture , then release ! Damn , governments are stupid... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't they train these dogs to hunt down some REAL pirates.Oh, I forgot, THOSE [nation.co.ke] they just capture, then release!Damn, governments are stupid....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214675</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Farmer Tim</author>
	<datestamp>1244108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people</i></p><p>They are; the heads of organisations like the MPA clearly have learning difficulties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped peopleThey are ; the heads of organisations like the MPA clearly have learning difficulties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped peopleThey are; the heads of organisations like the MPA clearly have learning difficulties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221579</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>legojenn</author>
	<datestamp>1244213040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If these dogs are like my dogs, they would be drooling at the thought of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If these dogs are like my dogs , they would be drooling at the thought of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If these dogs are like my dogs, they would be drooling at the thought of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217581</id>
	<title>F*CK negative slashdot commenters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244126580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The MPA did something clever here. They deserve props not only for not targeting your 72 year old aunt for "making available" or some such idiocy, but for using a clever way to find the actual, honest to goodness and real pirates.

jeez.
Any organization that slashdot commenters just don't like are damned if they do, or damned if they don't. If Microsoft open sourced their entire software catalog, slashdot commenters would still find reasons to pull their hair out over it. Have you even heard of intellectual honesty?

So, respectfully, and ignoring any 5 digit or less commenter, fuck you goddamn Digg rejects. Go twitter yourselves, assholes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The MPA did something clever here .
They deserve props not only for not targeting your 72 year old aunt for " making available " or some such idiocy , but for using a clever way to find the actual , honest to goodness and real pirates .
jeez . Any organization that slashdot commenters just do n't like are damned if they do , or damned if they do n't .
If Microsoft open sourced their entire software catalog , slashdot commenters would still find reasons to pull their hair out over it .
Have you even heard of intellectual honesty ?
So , respectfully , and ignoring any 5 digit or less commenter , fuck you goddamn Digg rejects .
Go twitter yourselves , assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The MPA did something clever here.
They deserve props not only for not targeting your 72 year old aunt for "making available" or some such idiocy, but for using a clever way to find the actual, honest to goodness and real pirates.
jeez.
Any organization that slashdot commenters just don't like are damned if they do, or damned if they don't.
If Microsoft open sourced their entire software catalog, slashdot commenters would still find reasons to pull their hair out over it.
Have you even heard of intellectual honesty?
So, respectfully, and ignoring any 5 digit or less commenter, fuck you goddamn Digg rejects.
Go twitter yourselves, assholes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218383</id>
	<title>the pending lawsuit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, let's see...</p><p>35,000 discs by...<br>150,000 dollars maximum damages per infringement equals...</p><p>$5,250,000,000 the movie studios could potentially have lost if this ONE SHIPMENT made it to its destination!  That's almost as much damage as devastating hurricanes in major urban areas!  Wow, I sure am glad they arrested these hoodlums before they could do real damage.  I'll be waiting to follow the details of the lawsuit once they're extradited to the USA and their feet held to the fire.</p><p>What's that you say?  The MPAA and RIAA only pursue maximum damages for outrageous awards in cases against helpless individuals responsible for a few downloads?  Oh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , let 's see...35,000 discs by...150,000 dollars maximum damages per infringement equals... $ 5,250,000,000 the movie studios could potentially have lost if this ONE SHIPMENT made it to its destination !
That 's almost as much damage as devastating hurricanes in major urban areas !
Wow , I sure am glad they arrested these hoodlums before they could do real damage .
I 'll be waiting to follow the details of the lawsuit once they 're extradited to the USA and their feet held to the fire.What 's that you say ?
The MPAA and RIAA only pursue maximum damages for outrageous awards in cases against helpless individuals responsible for a few downloads ?
Oh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, let's see...35,000 discs by...150,000 dollars maximum damages per infringement equals...$5,250,000,000 the movie studios could potentially have lost if this ONE SHIPMENT made it to its destination!
That's almost as much damage as devastating hurricanes in major urban areas!
Wow, I sure am glad they arrested these hoodlums before they could do real damage.
I'll be waiting to follow the details of the lawsuit once they're extradited to the USA and their feet held to the fire.What's that you say?
The MPAA and RIAA only pursue maximum damages for outrageous awards in cases against helpless individuals responsible for a few downloads?
Oh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216047</id>
	<title>Beagles</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1244115540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My beagles ate a DVD once.  They also apparently like Python, as they ate the cover off of "Programming Python".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My beagles ate a DVD once .
They also apparently like Python , as they ate the cover off of " Programming Python " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My beagles ate a DVD once.
They also apparently like Python, as they ate the cover off of "Programming Python".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214685</id>
	<title>Smells like a made up story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to scare the kids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to scare the kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to scare the kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217279</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>tacarat</author>
	<datestamp>1244123640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They can bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs. You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.</p></div><p>

Strangely enough, the dog training is probably the best ROI they've had.  A bit of training, lifetime supply of Alpo and a handler that'll take it home at the end of the day probably worked out cheaper than a week's worth of lawyer fees.  Given that they're actually stopping for-profit-piracy, as opposed to just alienating their customers, it seems like they need to look this over and reallocate their funding.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can bribe judges , hire lawyers , buy congress , complain , make commercials and now train dogs .
You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system .
Strangely enough , the dog training is probably the best ROI they 've had .
A bit of training , lifetime supply of Alpo and a handler that 'll take it home at the end of the day probably worked out cheaper than a week 's worth of lawyer fees .
Given that they 're actually stopping for-profit-piracy , as opposed to just alienating their customers , it seems like they need to look this over and reallocate their funding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can bribe judges, hire lawyers, buy congress, complain, make commercials and now train dogs.
You would think that with all this money they could come up with a working business model other then abusing the legal system.
Strangely enough, the dog training is probably the best ROI they've had.
A bit of training, lifetime supply of Alpo and a handler that'll take it home at the end of the day probably worked out cheaper than a week's worth of lawyer fees.
Given that they're actually stopping for-profit-piracy, as opposed to just alienating their customers, it seems like they need to look this over and reallocate their funding.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218997</id>
	<title>Re:Mod me down, but...</title>
	<author>Co0Ps</author>
	<datestamp>1244142900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. And I will from now on always use a "Mod me down, but...." expression in the title or beginning of my comments as reverse psychology apparently works on the mods.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
And I will from now on always use a " Mod me down , but.... " expression in the title or beginning of my comments as reverse psychology apparently works on the mods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
And I will from now on always use a "Mod me down, but...." expression in the title or beginning of my comments as reverse psychology apparently works on the mods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216559</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>arose</author>
	<datestamp>1244118600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones.... Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Chances are they are just providing an excuse for a warrant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt there 's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones.... Chances are , they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place .
Chances are they are just providing an excuse for a warrant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt there's any difference in the type of polycarbonate used for pirated DVDs versus legitimate ones.... Chances are, they are trained to smell a significant concentration of any optical media in a single place.
Chances are they are just providing an excuse for a warrant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218913</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1244142180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> If they can train a dog to find DVDs in Malaysia that AREN'T pirated, give me a call. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they can train a dog to find DVDs in Malaysia that ARE N'T pirated , give me a call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If they can train a dog to find DVDs in Malaysia that AREN'T pirated, give me a call. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218811</id>
	<title>Re:35,000 is not "huge"</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1244140800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline.</p></div><p>Well, I hope the dog reads<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline.Well , I hope the dog reads / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline.Well, I hope the dog reads /.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215087</id>
	<title>Black Sharpie</title>
	<author>iFiLa</author>
	<datestamp>1244110620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All you need is a black Sharpie marker and it throws the dogs off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All you need is a black Sharpie marker and it throws the dogs off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All you need is a black Sharpie marker and it throws the dogs off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216157</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>hurfy</author>
	<datestamp>1244116200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sigh</p><p>"such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"...."</p><p>That and the fact that at least some of the titles are not even out on DVD yet might be another clue....</p><p>And despite our summary (if jumping to conclusions was an olympic sport...every country would be trying to recruit us...) the Yahoo article does not indicate if the dog can tell a burned DVD from a pressed one. Look at the shipping papers... go from there. Not exactly complicated at that point even for a lowly cop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sigh " such a high concentration of media in one place screams " professional pirates " .... " That and the fact that at least some of the titles are not even out on DVD yet might be another clue....And despite our summary ( if jumping to conclusions was an olympic sport...every country would be trying to recruit us... ) the Yahoo article does not indicate if the dog can tell a burned DVD from a pressed one .
Look at the shipping papers... go from there .
Not exactly complicated at that point even for a lowly cop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sigh"such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"...."That and the fact that at least some of the titles are not even out on DVD yet might be another clue....And despite our summary (if jumping to conclusions was an olympic sport...every country would be trying to recruit us...) the Yahoo article does not indicate if the dog can tell a burned DVD from a pressed one.
Look at the shipping papers... go from there.
Not exactly complicated at that point even for a lowly cop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219881</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244199360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's the parrot crap they smell. It has nothing to do with the actual disks. They just don't want the pirates to know, so that they won't de-parrot the disks.</p></div><p>The discs wont work without the parrot-y bits.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the parrot crap they smell .
It has nothing to do with the actual disks .
They just do n't want the pirates to know , so that they wo n't de-parrot the disks.The discs wont work without the parrot-y bits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the parrot crap they smell.
It has nothing to do with the actual disks.
They just don't want the pirates to know, so that they won't de-parrot the disks.The discs wont work without the parrot-y bits.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215141</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220673</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>PixetaledPikachu</author>
	<datestamp>1244207760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.



Way to go, humanity!</p></div><p>How is it useless?
Pirating copyrighted material is a crime, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>just great , instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people , they use them for useless stuff like this .
Way to go , humanity ! How is it useless ?
Pirating copyrighted material is a crime , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.
Way to go, humanity!How is it useless?
Pirating copyrighted material is a crime, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215141</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1244110860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the parrot crap they smell. It has nothing to do with the actual disks. They just don't want the pirates to know, so that they won't de-parrot the disks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the parrot crap they smell .
It has nothing to do with the actual disks .
They just do n't want the pirates to know , so that they wo n't de-parrot the disks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the parrot crap they smell.
It has nothing to do with the actual disks.
They just don't want the pirates to know, so that they won't de-parrot the disks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218175</id>
	<title>Better idea...</title>
	<author>jerrydel</author>
	<datestamp>1244133720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if they just trained a dog to howl <i>on-key</i>?  By expanding their catalog that way they'd probably make more money, although it might take the public awhile to get reacquainted with what that sounds like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if they just trained a dog to howl on-key ?
By expanding their catalog that way they 'd probably make more money , although it might take the public awhile to get reacquainted with what that sounds like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if they just trained a dog to howl on-key?
By expanding their catalog that way they'd probably make more money, although it might take the public awhile to get reacquainted with what that sounds like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216723</id>
	<title>Re:35,000 is not "huge"</title>
	<author>rtb61</author>
	<datestamp>1244119440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> The piracy is obviously detected by the eyes of the handler and the nose of the dog. The dog detects the odour of the disc manufacturing process and the handler inspect the packages, if they are labelled as DVD coming from a expected source and going to and expected source, fin. However if they are labelled as something other than DVD coming from a questionable source and going to a questionable source then there is a problem. </p><p> So pirates (often also the legal low cost producer) simply needs to camouflage their pirate DVDs as legal DVDs and not as something else. In the rare case they are DVDRs simply identify them as a legal shipment of blank DVDRs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The piracy is obviously detected by the eyes of the handler and the nose of the dog .
The dog detects the odour of the disc manufacturing process and the handler inspect the packages , if they are labelled as DVD coming from a expected source and going to and expected source , fin .
However if they are labelled as something other than DVD coming from a questionable source and going to a questionable source then there is a problem .
So pirates ( often also the legal low cost producer ) simply needs to camouflage their pirate DVDs as legal DVDs and not as something else .
In the rare case they are DVDRs simply identify them as a legal shipment of blank DVDRs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The piracy is obviously detected by the eyes of the handler and the nose of the dog.
The dog detects the odour of the disc manufacturing process and the handler inspect the packages, if they are labelled as DVD coming from a expected source and going to and expected source, fin.
However if they are labelled as something other than DVD coming from a questionable source and going to a questionable source then there is a problem.
So pirates (often also the legal low cost producer) simply needs to camouflage their pirate DVDs as legal DVDs and not as something else.
In the rare case they are DVDRs simply identify them as a legal shipment of blank DVDRs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979</id>
	<title>35,000 is not "huge"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244115120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Well, the title says "Anti-Piracy Dog" so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk</i>
<br> <br>
That's not the only thing misleading about the title - 35,000 is not exactly a "huge" number of discs.<br> <br>
According to Amazon, a 10-pack of slim-line discs measures 3x6x5 inches. That's 90sqin, or 9sqin per disk. Multiply by 35,000, and you get 315,000sqin. Sounds like a lot, but that's only 180 square feet. The entire stash would sit neatly on two pallets (stacked 6.5' high) or in 1/15 of a standard shipping container.<br> <br>
The same number of disks stored on 100-pack spindles would fit in a 4'x4'x3' stack, or slightly more than the cargo area of a Yaris. So, kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the title says " Anti-Piracy Dog " so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk That 's not the only thing misleading about the title - 35,000 is not exactly a " huge " number of discs .
According to Amazon , a 10-pack of slim-line discs measures 3x6x5 inches .
That 's 90sqin , or 9sqin per disk .
Multiply by 35,000 , and you get 315,000sqin .
Sounds like a lot , but that 's only 180 square feet .
The entire stash would sit neatly on two pallets ( stacked 6.5 ' high ) or in 1/15 of a standard shipping container .
The same number of disks stored on 100-pack spindles would fit in a 4'x4'x3 ' stack , or slightly more than the cargo area of a Yaris .
So , kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the title says "Anti-Piracy Dog" so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk
 
That's not the only thing misleading about the title - 35,000 is not exactly a "huge" number of discs.
According to Amazon, a 10-pack of slim-line discs measures 3x6x5 inches.
That's 90sqin, or 9sqin per disk.
Multiply by 35,000, and you get 315,000sqin.
Sounds like a lot, but that's only 180 square feet.
The entire stash would sit neatly on two pallets (stacked 6.5' high) or in 1/15 of a standard shipping container.
The same number of disks stored on 100-pack spindles would fit in a 4'x4'x3' stack, or slightly more than the cargo area of a Yaris.
So, kudos to the dog for finding such a small target but deduct points for the overly-enthusiastic headline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220137</id>
	<title>Great idea!</title>
	<author>metacell</author>
	<datestamp>1244202180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you train them to find bugs too?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you train them to find bugs too ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you train them to find bugs too?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218433</id>
	<title>how about sniffing for cancer/disease?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>they have dogs that do better than dr.'s
that would actually do some good for all people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they have dogs that do better than dr. 's that would actually do some good for all people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they have dogs that do better than dr.'s
that would actually do some good for all people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221449</id>
	<title>I seldom see pirated DVDs in Singapore nowadays</title>
	<author>troll8901</author>
	<datestamp>1244212440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seldom see pirated DVDs in Singapore nowadays.  If I see anyone selling bootleg DVDs, it's always a surprise to me.</p><p>I think most of us who get pirated movies, do it via P2P.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seldom see pirated DVDs in Singapore nowadays .
If I see anyone selling bootleg DVDs , it 's always a surprise to me.I think most of us who get pirated movies , do it via P2P .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seldom see pirated DVDs in Singapore nowadays.
If I see anyone selling bootleg DVDs, it's always a surprise to me.I think most of us who get pirated movies, do it via P2P.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</id>
	<title>And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244108400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.
<br> <br>
Way to go, humanity!</htmltext>
<tokenext>just great , instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people , they use them for useless stuff like this .
Way to go , humanity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just great, instead of training dogs to help guide handicapped people, they use them for useless stuff like this.
Way to go, humanity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214781</id>
	<title>Never mind DVD sniffing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244109000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they train a dog to sniff out <b>Bittorrent packets</b>, I'll be truly impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they train a dog to sniff out Bittorrent packets , I 'll be truly impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they train a dog to sniff out Bittorrent packets, I'll be truly impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216089</id>
	<title>Thats fine</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1244115780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is fine because I burn my cd's with curry powder and paprika.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is fine because I burn my cd 's with curry powder and paprika .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is fine because I burn my cd's with curry powder and paprika.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214975</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>nabsltd</author>
	<datestamp>1244109960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse isn't a disc manufacturing company, a computer company, or a computer/movie/music store, such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"</p></div><p>The last place I worked, we had an 8-tray DVD duplicator/printer, and bought blank disks in palette loads, and we weren't any of the types of companies that you listed, although we did use computers a lot (as do most places these days).</p><p>We used them entirely for distributing content that either we had personally created or that clients gave us the rights to duplicate for them.  Some of the content was commecials that you've probably seen on TV, and some was computer programs written in-house.</p><p>Maybe today we'd go with a commercial duplicator, but back then you could get a 100 copy run at all (or at least not for less than extortionate prices).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse is n't a disc manufacturing company , a computer company , or a computer/movie/music store , such a high concentration of media in one place screams " professional pirates " The last place I worked , we had an 8-tray DVD duplicator/printer , and bought blank disks in palette loads , and we were n't any of the types of companies that you listed , although we did use computers a lot ( as do most places these days ) .We used them entirely for distributing content that either we had personally created or that clients gave us the rights to duplicate for them .
Some of the content was commecials that you 've probably seen on TV , and some was computer programs written in-house.Maybe today we 'd go with a commercial duplicator , but back then you could get a 100 copy run at all ( or at least not for less than extortionate prices ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they smell 35,000 of the things and the warehouse isn't a disc manufacturing company, a computer company, or a computer/movie/music store, such a high concentration of media in one place screams "professional pirates"The last place I worked, we had an 8-tray DVD duplicator/printer, and bought blank disks in palette loads, and we weren't any of the types of companies that you listed, although we did use computers a lot (as do most places these days).We used them entirely for distributing content that either we had personally created or that clients gave us the rights to duplicate for them.
Some of the content was commecials that you've probably seen on TV, and some was computer programs written in-house.Maybe today we'd go with a commercial duplicator, but back then you could get a 100 copy run at all (or at least not for less than extortionate prices).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220147</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Ginger Unicorn</author>
	<datestamp>1244202360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False\_dichotomy" title="wikipedia.org">That's incorrect</a> [wikipedia.org]. To qualify as a false dilemma, the argument simply needs to assume there are only two options when there are in fact more. In this case a third option, doing both, is still arguably possible. The fact that both endeavours require non-zero resources does not necessarily constrain the solution to only doing one of them. It is only if the amount of resources required to do both of them is larger than the amount of available resources that the choice becomes constrained. Until you can demonstrate that this is the case, restricting the argument to doing one or the other is a false dilemma.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's incorrect [ wikipedia.org ] .
To qualify as a false dilemma , the argument simply needs to assume there are only two options when there are in fact more .
In this case a third option , doing both , is still arguably possible .
The fact that both endeavours require non-zero resources does not necessarily constrain the solution to only doing one of them .
It is only if the amount of resources required to do both of them is larger than the amount of available resources that the choice becomes constrained .
Until you can demonstrate that this is the case , restricting the argument to doing one or the other is a false dilemma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's incorrect [wikipedia.org].
To qualify as a false dilemma, the argument simply needs to assume there are only two options when there are in fact more.
In this case a third option, doing both, is still arguably possible.
The fact that both endeavours require non-zero resources does not necessarily constrain the solution to only doing one of them.
It is only if the amount of resources required to do both of them is larger than the amount of available resources that the choice becomes constrained.
Until you can demonstrate that this is the case, restricting the argument to doing one or the other is a false dilemma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215035</id>
	<title>wish I was a dog</title>
	<author>fluffernutter</author>
	<datestamp>1244110320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah I guess chasing down pesky armed robbers, rapists, and wife beaters was too hard.. Man even todays generation of DOGS has it easy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I guess chasing down pesky armed robbers , rapists , and wife beaters was too hard.. Man even todays generation of DOGS has it easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I guess chasing down pesky armed robbers, rapists, and wife beaters was too hard.. Man even todays generation of DOGS has it easy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28229755</id>
	<title>Coasters</title>
	<author>Kaiwen</author>
	<datestamp>1244217180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>35,000 is a "<i>huge</i>" cache?! Puh-LEESE! Here in Shanghai, DVD factories churn out ten times that number before breakfast. In economic terms, it'd be like running down to the police station to report my pocket change missing.

China is a movie watcher's paradise. 5rmb'll get you anything. The new Star Trek hit the streets four days before it hit theatres.

<p>Lee Kaiwen, Shanghai</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>35,000 is a " huge " cache ? !
Puh-LEESE ! Here in Shanghai , DVD factories churn out ten times that number before breakfast .
In economic terms , it 'd be like running down to the police station to report my pocket change missing .
China is a movie watcher 's paradise .
5rmb 'll get you anything .
The new Star Trek hit the streets four days before it hit theatres .
Lee Kaiwen , Shanghai</tokentext>
<sentencetext>35,000 is a "huge" cache?!
Puh-LEESE! Here in Shanghai, DVD factories churn out ten times that number before breakfast.
In economic terms, it'd be like running down to the police station to report my pocket change missing.
China is a movie watcher's paradise.
5rmb'll get you anything.
The new Star Trek hit the streets four days before it hit theatres.
Lee Kaiwen, Shanghai</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214791</id>
	<title>Animal Cruelty!</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1244109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of the movies made recently reek so bad I would worry about them permanently damaging the poor dogs nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the movies made recently reek so bad I would worry about them permanently damaging the poor dogs nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the movies made recently reek so bad I would worry about them permanently damaging the poor dogs nose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221443</id>
	<title>Re:Let Me Guess . . .</title>
	<author>JoeMerchant</author>
	<datestamp>1244212440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No Lassie?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Lassie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Lassie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214849</id>
	<title>THAT is piracy</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1244109300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me.  If you think it is, you're wrong and the law backs up the "slashdot accepted definition" perfectly.  The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE.  These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent.  These are the same illegal copies that never needed the DMCA.</p><p>This story illustrates precisely what piracy is when it comes to copyrighted media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me .
If you think it is , you 're wrong and the law backs up the " slashdot accepted definition " perfectly .
The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE .
These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent .
These are the same illegal copies that never needed the DMCA.This story illustrates precisely what piracy is when it comes to copyrighted media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I hear of copyright infringement being called theft or piracy it just bugs me.
If you think it is, you're wrong and the law backs up the "slashdot accepted definition" perfectly.
The piracy that is most targetted are illegal copies FOR SALE.
These are the same illegal copies that the DVD CSS does not prevent.
These are the same illegal copies that never needed the DMCA.This story illustrates precisely what piracy is when it comes to copyrighted media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215185</id>
	<title>Those aren't pirate DVDs</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1244110980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're just local <em>cache</em> for TPB!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're just local cache for TPB !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're just local cache for TPB!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215117</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244110740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ey, so why are you wasting time on Slashdot when you could be helping the blind or something equally useful?</p><p>Also, I hope you're posting from a library computer or something because if you bought your own instead of buying one for a school or something then you're going to hell!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ey , so why are you wasting time on Slashdot when you could be helping the blind or something equally useful ? Also , I hope you 're posting from a library computer or something because if you bought your own instead of buying one for a school or something then you 're going to hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ey, so why are you wasting time on Slashdot when you could be helping the blind or something equally useful?Also, I hope you're posting from a library computer or something because if you bought your own instead of buying one for a school or something then you're going to hell!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731</id>
	<title>Re:So the dog go off on any dvd-r</title>
	<author>cjfs</author>
	<datestamp>1244108820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How about just data only disks with no movies on them?</p></div><p>Well, the title says "Anti-Piracy Dog" so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk. Given most movies lately, I don't envy it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about just data only disks with no movies on them ? Well , the title says " Anti-Piracy Dog " so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk .
Given most movies lately , I do n't envy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about just data only disks with no movies on them?Well, the title says "Anti-Piracy Dog" so it must have a means of smelling the contents of the disk.
Given most movies lately, I don't envy it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225619</id>
	<title>Hey dogs.</title>
	<author>FreeFull</author>
	<datestamp>1244229240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do the dogs distinguish between a pirated movie a Linux disc? I'm afraid the police will stop my Linux distribution network. Better use something to cover up the smell from the warehouses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the dogs distinguish between a pirated movie a Linux disc ?
I 'm afraid the police will stop my Linux distribution network .
Better use something to cover up the smell from the warehouses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the dogs distinguish between a pirated movie a Linux disc?
I'm afraid the police will stop my Linux distribution network.
Better use something to cover up the smell from the warehouses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214831</id>
	<title>Re:So....</title>
	<author>kaiser423</author>
	<datestamp>1244109240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>who says that abusing the legal system isn't a viable business model?  Lots do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>who says that abusing the legal system is n't a viable business model ?
Lots do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who says that abusing the legal system isn't a viable business model?
Lots do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220325</id>
	<title>Re:And the blind?</title>
	<author>AlecC</author>
	<datestamp>1244204820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does it actually displace dogs trained for the blind? Is there a shortage of appropriate dogs or trainers that would stop both kinds of dogs being trained, if the money was available? Because otherwise, it is not displacing dogs for the blind any more than any other kind of spending would. In fact, there might be economies of scale in dog training establishments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it actually displace dogs trained for the blind ?
Is there a shortage of appropriate dogs or trainers that would stop both kinds of dogs being trained , if the money was available ?
Because otherwise , it is not displacing dogs for the blind any more than any other kind of spending would .
In fact , there might be economies of scale in dog training establishments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it actually displace dogs trained for the blind?
Is there a shortage of appropriate dogs or trainers that would stop both kinds of dogs being trained, if the money was available?
Because otherwise, it is not displacing dogs for the blind any more than any other kind of spending would.
In fact, there might be economies of scale in dog training establishments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217753</id>
	<title>Re:Misconception</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People are assuming it is the disc itself they are finding.  But most of these pirate DVDs have a very distinctive smell.  They use WAY too much ink on the cover/disk and on the paper for the cover.  Some of the are downright gooie.  I am not surprised that they can tell the difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People are assuming it is the disc itself they are finding .
But most of these pirate DVDs have a very distinctive smell .
They use WAY too much ink on the cover/disk and on the paper for the cover .
Some of the are downright gooie .
I am not surprised that they can tell the difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are assuming it is the disc itself they are finding.
But most of these pirate DVDs have a very distinctive smell.
They use WAY too much ink on the cover/disk and on the paper for the cover.
Some of the are downright gooie.
I am not surprised that they can tell the difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227</id>
	<title>Misconception</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1244111220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story doesn't say the dogs can tell the difference between a legit DVD and an illegal copy. I'd guess the dogs are trained to find DVDs, period. If said DVDs are in crates stacked in some warehouse where they shouldn't be, then the dog has found some pirated DVDs.</p><p>But really, what legitimate reason do you guys have for disliking this - other than a general hatred of the MPA? Unlike many/most of the tactics used by that organization and its spawn, this seems reasonable. But so far in this discussion I've seen a lot of silliness and/or venom being contributed, but very little intelligent thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story does n't say the dogs can tell the difference between a legit DVD and an illegal copy .
I 'd guess the dogs are trained to find DVDs , period .
If said DVDs are in crates stacked in some warehouse where they should n't be , then the dog has found some pirated DVDs.But really , what legitimate reason do you guys have for disliking this - other than a general hatred of the MPA ?
Unlike many/most of the tactics used by that organization and its spawn , this seems reasonable .
But so far in this discussion I 've seen a lot of silliness and/or venom being contributed , but very little intelligent thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story doesn't say the dogs can tell the difference between a legit DVD and an illegal copy.
I'd guess the dogs are trained to find DVDs, period.
If said DVDs are in crates stacked in some warehouse where they shouldn't be, then the dog has found some pirated DVDs.But really, what legitimate reason do you guys have for disliking this - other than a general hatred of the MPA?
Unlike many/most of the tactics used by that organization and its spawn, this seems reasonable.
But so far in this discussion I've seen a lot of silliness and/or venom being contributed, but very little intelligent thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214779
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216389
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28233301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28223137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215801
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28226877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218147
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225107
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1620225_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214731
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215979
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225057
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218811
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216723
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219821
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215625
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215059
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217649
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216337
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28226877
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214787
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214783
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216157
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219049
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28223137
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217111
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215025
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217907
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216069
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215927
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218147
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215801
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214943
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220407
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215141
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28219881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28233301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214781
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28224465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28222679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218825
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215035
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218785
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214799
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28221871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216219
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215589
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215633
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215465
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28225017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214671
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218571
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220147
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220671
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214675
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28216097
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28217145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28218997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28220383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1620225.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28214793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1620225.28215939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
