<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_1650226</id>
	<title>Microsoft Rebrands Live Search As "Bing"</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243530060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://jacob.steelsmith.org/" rel="nofollow">JacobSteelsmith</a> writes <i>"Microsoft is attempting to re-brand its Live Search, also known as Kumo. Bing, as it's known, is another attempt by Microsoft to lure consumers away from Internet search leaders such as Google. Microsoft has posted a quarterly loss in its online advertising business, compared to Google's sales, $4.7 billion in the first quarter. According to the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2009/05/28/the-sound-of-found-bing.aspx">Live Search blog</a>, Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results. It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions. It is <a href="http://www.decisionengine.com/Default.html">being touted as a 'decision engine.'</a>"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>JacobSteelsmith writes " Microsoft is attempting to re-brand its Live Search , also known as Kumo .
Bing , as it 's known , is another attempt by Microsoft to lure consumers away from Internet search leaders such as Google .
Microsoft has posted a quarterly loss in its online advertising business , compared to Google 's sales , $ 4.7 billion in the first quarter .
According to the Live Search blog , Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster , more informed decisions ' by combining a 'great search engine ' with organized results .
It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions .
It is being touted as a 'decision engine .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JacobSteelsmith writes "Microsoft is attempting to re-brand its Live Search, also known as Kumo.
Bing, as it's known, is another attempt by Microsoft to lure consumers away from Internet search leaders such as Google.
Microsoft has posted a quarterly loss in its online advertising business, compared to Google's sales, $4.7 billion in the first quarter.
According to the Live Search blog, Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results.
It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions.
It is being touted as a 'decision engine.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129609</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>The Angry Mick</author>
	<datestamp>1243502760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Because one company has done something really well, nobody else should try?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Agreed. Before Google, there was Yahoo; before Microsoft, there was IBM; before Slashdot, "Bored and confused geeks would scribble 'First Post' in the sand".  All progress stems from prior art.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because one company has done something really well , nobody else should try ?
Agreed. Before Google , there was Yahoo ; before Microsoft , there was IBM ; before Slashdot , " Bored and confused geeks would scribble 'First Post ' in the sand " .
All progress stems from prior art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Because one company has done something really well, nobody else should try?
Agreed. Before Google, there was Yahoo; before Microsoft, there was IBM; before Slashdot, "Bored and confused geeks would scribble 'First Post' in the sand".
All progress stems from prior art.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125809</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>Capt.DrumkenBum</author>
	<datestamp>1243534320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft wastes more time and effort on an Internet product almost no one will use. They really should just give up on trying to make money from the Internet. They just don't understand what people want.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft wastes more time and effort on an Internet product almost no one will use .
They really should just give up on trying to make money from the Internet .
They just do n't understand what people want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft wastes more time and effort on an Internet product almost no one will use.
They really should just give up on trying to make money from the Internet.
They just don't understand what people want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128793</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>ATL\_gadget\_grrl</author>
	<datestamp>1243543260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BING = "Big Idea: Nick Google!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>BING = " Big Idea : Nick Google !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BING = "Big Idea: Nick Google!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129689</id>
	<title>But, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to fucking KILL Gooogle!</p><p>Steve Ballmer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to fucking KILL Gooogle ! Steve Ballmer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to fucking KILL Gooogle!Steve Ballmer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126503</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>milas</author>
	<datestamp>1243536780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).</p></div><p>Microsoft bought www.farecast.com a while ago, so I imagine they're just integrating Farecast into Live/Bing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool ( though pretty easy to clone ) .Microsoft bought www.farecast.com a while ago , so I imagine they 're just integrating Farecast into Live/Bing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).Microsoft bought www.farecast.com a while ago, so I imagine they're just integrating Farecast into Live/Bing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133033</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>professorflipwig</author>
	<datestamp>1243518900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is an engine Microsoft uses to make decisions for you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is an engine Microsoft uses to make decisions for you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is an engine Microsoft uses to make decisions for you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819</id>
	<title>Terminology</title>
	<author>mmkkbb</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft may have posted a quarterly loss, but comparing that with 4.7 billion dollars of gross revenue doesn't even make sense. Did Google make a profit on that 4.7 billion and how much? That's the important question, and none of the press releases linked here have an answer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft may have posted a quarterly loss , but comparing that with 4.7 billion dollars of gross revenue does n't even make sense .
Did Google make a profit on that 4.7 billion and how much ?
That 's the important question , and none of the press releases linked here have an answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft may have posted a quarterly loss, but comparing that with 4.7 billion dollars of gross revenue doesn't even make sense.
Did Google make a profit on that 4.7 billion and how much?
That's the important question, and none of the press releases linked here have an answer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129891</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>tedgyz</author>
	<datestamp>1243504080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bing Is Not Google</p></div><p>How about BINGOOGLE?</p><p>Should I register bingoogle.com?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing Is Not GoogleHow about BINGOOGLE ? Should I register bingoogle.com ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing Is Not GoogleHow about BINGOOGLE?Should I register bingoogle.com?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126261</id>
	<title>Rebranding -- that's what's needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only they'd called "Microsoft Bob" something else...</p><p>"Steaming Pile of Shit" would have been a bestseller!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only they 'd called " Microsoft Bob " something else... " Steaming Pile of Shit " would have been a bestseller !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only they'd called "Microsoft Bob" something else..."Steaming Pile of Shit" would have been a bestseller!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126333</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...which inspired this:<br><a href="http://bingnedryerson.ytmnd.com/" title="ytmnd.com" rel="nofollow">http://bingnedryerson.ytmnd.com/</a> [ytmnd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which inspired this : http : //bingnedryerson.ytmnd.com/ [ ytmnd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which inspired this:http://bingnedryerson.ytmnd.com/ [ytmnd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126603</id>
	<title>All that money into marketing ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many millions (billions?!) do they spend on marketing and branding. If I paid that much, and all they came up with was Zune, Squirt and Bing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. I'd be pissed and would want a refund.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many millions ( billions ? !
) do they spend on marketing and branding .
If I paid that much , and all they came up with was Zune , Squirt and Bing .. I 'd be pissed and would want a refund .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many millions (billions?!
) do they spend on marketing and branding.
If I paid that much, and all they came up with was Zune, Squirt and Bing .. I'd be pissed and would want a refund.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127617</id>
	<title>They need new marketing advice</title>
	<author>oDDmON oUT</author>
	<datestamp>1243540020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't they say much the same things about <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/windowsvista/default.mspx" title="microsoft.com">Vista</a> [microsoft.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they say much the same things about Vista [ microsoft.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they say much the same things about Vista [microsoft.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134975</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>SlashWombat</author>
	<datestamp>1243534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about "Let me BONG that for you?  (What were they smoking?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " Let me BONG that for you ?
( What were they smoking ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "Let me BONG that for you?
(What were they smoking?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126271</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>AlphaZeta</author>
	<datestamp>1243536060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But Indeed No Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Indeed No Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Indeed No Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135129</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>true, true, but it's nearly google, better in network grokking, and blithely ignores naming glitches....<br>I mean, really? Scottish mine tailings : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing\_(mining)<br>Isn't this UNIX tool going to cause confusion? http://fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing\_src-readme.shtml</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>true , true , but it 's nearly google , better in network grokking , and blithely ignores naming glitches....I mean , really ?
Scottish mine tailings : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing \ _ ( mining ) Is n't this UNIX tool going to cause confusion ?
http : //fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing \ _src-readme.shtml</tokentext>
<sentencetext>true, true, but it's nearly google, better in network grokking, and blithely ignores naming glitches....I mean, really?
Scottish mine tailings : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing\_(mining)Isn't this UNIX tool going to cause confusion?
http://fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing\_src-readme.shtml</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131783</id>
	<title>Read It As...</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1243512540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the headline as "Microsoft rebrands Live Search with 'bling'", which will likely prove closer to the truth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the headline as " Microsoft rebrands Live Search with 'bling ' " , which will likely prove closer to the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the headline as "Microsoft rebrands Live Search with 'bling'", which will likely prove closer to the truth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126797</id>
	<title>CROSBY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not the town in North Dakota.<br>For my generation Bing is followed by Crosby.</p><p>I am sure the people at MSFT are to young to have that association,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not the town in North Dakota.For my generation Bing is followed by Crosby.I am sure the people at MSFT are to young to have that association,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not the town in North Dakota.For my generation Bing is followed by Crosby.I am sure the people at MSFT are to young to have that association,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129163</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1243501320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're saying that Microsoft is so desperate for cash that they're looking for VC funding?  And am I the only one that freaked out and Googled ZigZagZoodilyDoo because I had never heard of it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying that Microsoft is so desperate for cash that they 're looking for VC funding ?
And am I the only one that freaked out and Googled ZigZagZoodilyDoo because I had never heard of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying that Microsoft is so desperate for cash that they're looking for VC funding?
And am I the only one that freaked out and Googled ZigZagZoodilyDoo because I had never heard of it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126295</id>
	<title>Re:organized results</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1243536060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could their results <i>be</i> any more organised?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could their results be any more organised ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could their results be any more organised?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126443</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>sure but how is Microsoft going to "fucking kill" Google unless they compete head to head?
<p>
Ballmer has promises to keep and i don't think he's focused on dollars and sense[sic]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sure but how is Microsoft going to " fucking kill " Google unless they compete head to head ?
Ballmer has promises to keep and i do n't think he 's focused on dollars and sense [ sic ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sure but how is Microsoft going to "fucking kill" Google unless they compete head to head?
Ballmer has promises to keep and i don't think he's focused on dollars and sense[sic]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126535</id>
	<title>pluses and minuses</title>
	<author>tubeguy</author>
	<datestamp>1243536840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Plus- it's easier to say than "Google"
Minus- it's not Google</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus- it 's easier to say than " Google " Minus- it 's not Google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus- it's easier to say than "Google"
Minus- it's not Google</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129039</id>
	<title>Reminds me of an old Dylan song...</title>
	<author>crovira</author>
	<datestamp>1243544100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many roads must a man walk down..."</p><p>before they "bing" him in the head with a brick.</p><p>Microsoft, living examples of the principle of:</p><p>
&nbsp; "You might be an idiot if you do something over and over again,<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; and you keep expecting different outcomes,<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; and are genuinely surprised when you step in the same shit again."</p><p>This time, its not working.</p><p>There are now anti-trust regulations and Microsoft can't try the old "buy out, or out spend, the opposition."</p><p>They were to late to the party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many roads must a man walk down... " before they " bing " him in the head with a brick.Microsoft , living examples of the principle of :   " You might be an idiot if you do something over and over again ,     and you keep expecting different outcomes ,     and are genuinely surprised when you step in the same shit again .
" This time , its not working.There are now anti-trust regulations and Microsoft ca n't try the old " buy out , or out spend , the opposition .
" They were to late to the party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many roads must a man walk down..."before they "bing" him in the head with a brick.Microsoft, living examples of the principle of:
  "You might be an idiot if you do something over and over again,
    and you keep expecting different outcomes,
    and are genuinely surprised when you step in the same shit again.
"This time, its not working.There are now anti-trust regulations and Microsoft can't try the old "buy out, or out spend, the opposition.
"They were to late to the party.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28159851</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1243797720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quit giving them ideas, nitwit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quit giving them ideas , nitwit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quit giving them ideas, nitwit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</id>
	<title>Bing?  Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?  Bong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129173</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Alinabi</author>
	<datestamp>1243501320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the way Microsoft behaves, it's probably gonna be Bada Bing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the way Microsoft behaves , it 's probably gon na be Bada Bing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the way Microsoft behaves, it's probably gonna be Bada Bing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126723</id>
	<title>binger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hahaha... You would think that MS would google their own product...  It seems pron-stars also like the name "Bing" just Google: "bing sucks"</p><p>Tee hee<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hahaha... You would think that MS would google their own product... It seems pron-stars also like the name " Bing " just Google : " bing sucks " Tee hee ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hahaha... You would think that MS would google their own product...  It seems pron-stars also like the name "Bing" just Google: "bing sucks"Tee hee ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127241</id>
	<title>Yaaawwwnnnnn</title>
	<author>QuietLagoon</author>
	<datestamp>1243539000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet another lame attempt by Microsoft to be a wanted part of people's online experiences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another lame attempt by Microsoft to be a wanted part of people 's online experiences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another lame attempt by Microsoft to be a wanted part of people's online experiences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129853</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>BronsCon</author>
	<datestamp>1243503840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, I happen to like the KDE beatboxing app... KRap</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I happen to like the KDE beatboxing app... KRap</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I happen to like the KDE beatboxing app... KRap</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125741</id>
	<title>Re:We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>Kaki Nix Sain</author>
	<datestamp>1243534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is the link for you.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arCITMfxvEc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arCITMfxvEc</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the link for you .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = arCITMfxvEc [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the link for you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arCITMfxvEc [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28146687</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243613040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No its more along the lines of "Bing back the Bling"

this is just a money train on a crash course.

<a href="http://pics.livejournal.com/bingbackdabling/pic/000011se" title="livejournal.com" rel="nofollow">http://pics.livejournal.com/bingbackdabling/pic/000011se</a> [livejournal.com]

Hilarious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No its more along the lines of " Bing back the Bling " this is just a money train on a crash course .
http : //pics.livejournal.com/bingbackdabling/pic/000011se [ livejournal.com ] Hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No its more along the lines of "Bing back the Bling"

this is just a money train on a crash course.
http://pics.livejournal.com/bingbackdabling/pic/000011se [livejournal.com]

Hilarious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129113</id>
	<title>Damn I just Bing'ed in my pants</title>
	<author>Latinhypercube</author>
	<datestamp>1243544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jeez that turd is totally bing'in, it's making me gag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeez that turd is totally bing'in , it 's making me gag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeez that turd is totally bing'in, it's making me gag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126247</id>
	<title>Synergy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right or wrong, I always suspect that MS search is designed with the purpose of pointing me preferentially towards MS owned content while Google is more neutral.  It is just too easy to imagine the meeting where some aspiring young MBA presents their power-point slides showing how a search portal that secretly directs people towards other company assets will leverage the synergistic potential, or some other BS like that.  I just don't trust MS to create a product that puts my interests (neutral indexing of internet content) ahead of their own (market share and stock price).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right or wrong , I always suspect that MS search is designed with the purpose of pointing me preferentially towards MS owned content while Google is more neutral .
It is just too easy to imagine the meeting where some aspiring young MBA presents their power-point slides showing how a search portal that secretly directs people towards other company assets will leverage the synergistic potential , or some other BS like that .
I just do n't trust MS to create a product that puts my interests ( neutral indexing of internet content ) ahead of their own ( market share and stock price ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right or wrong, I always suspect that MS search is designed with the purpose of pointing me preferentially towards MS owned content while Google is more neutral.
It is just too easy to imagine the meeting where some aspiring young MBA presents their power-point slides showing how a search portal that secretly directs people towards other company assets will leverage the synergistic potential, or some other BS like that.
I just don't trust MS to create a product that puts my interests (neutral indexing of internet content) ahead of their own (market share and stock price).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128403</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ya, and no one said that about Google..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ya , and no one said that about Google. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ya, and no one said that about Google..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127209</id>
	<title>Still more buzzsh*t</title>
	<author>DigitalContradiction</author>
	<datestamp>1243538940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A "decision engine" that goes "beyond the traditional search engines" ? Doesn't it sound just like a cheap try to surf on the hype wave from Wolfram|Alpha ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A " decision engine " that goes " beyond the traditional search engines " ?
Does n't it sound just like a cheap try to surf on the hype wave from Wolfram | Alpha ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A "decision engine" that goes "beyond the traditional search engines" ?
Doesn't it sound just like a cheap try to surf on the hype wave from Wolfram|Alpha ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126167</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1243535640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>They're trying to improve their profit, not their search engine. More users = more eyeballs = more advertising income.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS should seriously just stop trying to " improve " search engines .
They 're trying to improve their profit , not their search engine .
More users = more eyeballs = more advertising income .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines.
They're trying to improve their profit, not their search engine.
More users = more eyeballs = more advertising income.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126655</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recursive phrase! Must tear mind away!</p><p>BING is not Google is not Google is not Google...</p><p>Though notice as BING approaches infinity, BING is reduced and the phrase approaches an infinite "is not Google"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recursive phrase !
Must tear mind away ! BING is not Google is not Google is not Google...Though notice as BING approaches infinity , BING is reduced and the phrase approaches an infinite " is not Google " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recursive phrase!
Must tear mind away!BING is not Google is not Google is not Google...Though notice as BING approaches infinity, BING is reduced and the phrase approaches an infinite "is not Google"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28148561</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>suffe</author>
	<datestamp>1243687920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't that be Chanandler Bong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't that be Chanandler Bong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't that be Chanandler Bong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129499</id>
	<title>I hear...</title>
	<author>mrCasual</author>
	<datestamp>1243502460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... it beats its kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it beats its kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it beats its kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126301</id>
	<title>Bing! You're hypnotized!</title>
	<author>KritonK</author>
	<datestamp>1243536120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of the Donald Duck story <a href="http://coa.inducks.org/story.php?c=W+WDC+145-01" title="inducks.org" rel="nofollow">The Hypno-Gun</a> [inducks.org], where Donald's nephews had a gun with a spinning disk in front, that they would point at each other shouting "Bing! You're hypnotized!" and pretend that they had been hypnotized. Of course the gun was just a toy, only working on Donald, with the expected hilarious results.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the Donald Duck story The Hypno-Gun [ inducks.org ] , where Donald 's nephews had a gun with a spinning disk in front , that they would point at each other shouting " Bing !
You 're hypnotized !
" and pretend that they had been hypnotized .
Of course the gun was just a toy , only working on Donald , with the expected hilarious results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the Donald Duck story The Hypno-Gun [inducks.org], where Donald's nephews had a gun with a spinning disk in front, that they would point at each other shouting "Bing!
You're hypnotized!
" and pretend that they had been hypnotized.
Of course the gun was just a toy, only working on Donald, with the expected hilarious results.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125921</id>
	<title>Bing - the sound of being ricocheted all over MSN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bing" huh, it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think that using Microsoft's search is going to return results that'll bounce you all over the place and most likely, only to MS partners. After all, the most effective ricochets are those in confined spaces.  Maybe the internal name is really "Bing bing bing, bing, bing bing, bing." Followed by a bunch of "$" signs.</p><p>LoB</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bing " huh , it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think that using Microsoft 's search is going to return results that 'll bounce you all over the place and most likely , only to MS partners .
After all , the most effective ricochets are those in confined spaces .
Maybe the internal name is really " Bing bing bing , bing , bing bing , bing .
" Followed by a bunch of " $ " signs.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bing" huh, it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think that using Microsoft's search is going to return results that'll bounce you all over the place and most likely, only to MS partners.
After all, the most effective ricochets are those in confined spaces.
Maybe the internal name is really "Bing bing bing, bing, bing bing, bing.
" Followed by a bunch of "$" signs.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130397</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4. Government bailout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4 .
Government bailout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4.
Government bailout.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</id>
	<title>They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1243537320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already another tech company, Terabyte Unlimited, using that moniker as shorthand for their boot manager product, BootIt Next Generation.  If they've trademarked the abbreviation as well as the full name, they might wind up suing Microsoft over their use of it.</p><p>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already another tech company , Terabyte Unlimited , using that moniker as shorthand for their boot manager product , BootIt Next Generation .
If they 've trademarked the abbreviation as well as the full name , they might wind up suing Microsoft over their use of it.It 's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already another tech company, Terabyte Unlimited, using that moniker as shorthand for their boot manager product, BootIt Next Generation.
If they've trademarked the abbreviation as well as the full name, they might wind up suing Microsoft over their use of it.It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125959</id>
	<title>Re:We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>ausekilis</author>
	<datestamp>1243534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And give MS more publicity? NEVER!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And give MS more publicity ?
NEVER !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And give MS more publicity?
NEVER!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126253</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>cant\_get\_a\_good\_nick</author>
	<datestamp>1243536000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly this is the first thing I thought of.  The scary thing is, you can kind of tell this is trying to be a verb.</p><p>That and "can I <b>be</b> any more Chandler"</p><p>Can I <b>be</b> any more hopeless trying to catch google?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly this is the first thing I thought of .
The scary thing is , you can kind of tell this is trying to be a verb.That and " can I be any more Chandler " Can I be any more hopeless trying to catch google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly this is the first thing I thought of.
The scary thing is, you can kind of tell this is trying to be a verb.That and "can I be any more Chandler"Can I be any more hopeless trying to catch google?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126325</id>
	<title>That'll fix it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The root cause of their search woes is not due to deficient search results.  Obviously, the issue is the the lack of a Web 2.0-ey name.  Duh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The root cause of their search woes is not due to deficient search results .
Obviously , the issue is the the lack of a Web 2.0-ey name .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The root cause of their search woes is not due to deficient search results.
Obviously, the issue is the the lack of a Web 2.0-ey name.
Duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131939</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>zuperduperman</author>
	<datestamp>1243513260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;  But giving money back on "great products?" Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick? Smells faintly like desperation, that does</p><p>No, it smells like MS selling your search details and privacy to advertisers for a quick buck.  I'm actually open minded enough to try a search engine from MS if they really turn a new leaf with it, but that statement had me running for the hills.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; But giving money back on " great products ?
" Is that like discounts on MS software , or some other silly gimmick ?
Smells faintly like desperation , that doesNo , it smells like MS selling your search details and privacy to advertisers for a quick buck .
I 'm actually open minded enough to try a search engine from MS if they really turn a new leaf with it , but that statement had me running for the hills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;  But giving money back on "great products?
" Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick?
Smells faintly like desperation, that doesNo, it smells like MS selling your search details and privacy to advertisers for a quick buck.
I'm actually open minded enough to try a search engine from MS if they really turn a new leaf with it, but that statement had me running for the hills.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129589</id>
	<title>Re:GooglePLEX(tm)</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1243502700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would MS go after a trademark on the name of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googleplex" title="wikipedia.org">Google's headquarters</a> [wikipedia.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would MS go after a trademark on the name of Google 's headquarters [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would MS go after a trademark on the name of Google's headquarters [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129575</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Mr Europe</author>
	<datestamp>1243502700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft's trying seems so pathetic. It is hard to thibk any way the old dinosaur MS could anyway create anything better search engine than google and (soon ready) Wolfram Alpha. There is no space between.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's trying seems so pathetic .
It is hard to thibk any way the old dinosaur MS could anyway create anything better search engine than google and ( soon ready ) Wolfram Alpha .
There is no space between .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's trying seems so pathetic.
It is hard to thibk any way the old dinosaur MS could anyway create anything better search engine than google and (soon ready) Wolfram Alpha.
There is no space between.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135733</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Bing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243629300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft Blob?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Blob ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Blob?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128289</id>
	<title>Chandler Bing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if <a href="http://chandlerproject.org/" title="chandlerproject.org" rel="nofollow">Chandler</a> [chandlerproject.org] will have a plugin for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if Chandler [ chandlerproject.org ] will have a plugin for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if Chandler [chandlerproject.org] will have a plugin for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129077</id>
	<title>Re:organized results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243544220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, like Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , like Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, like Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633</id>
	<title>I think they might have someone</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243533780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>starting to think. It's a great name, too bad the momentum has been lost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>starting to think .
It 's a great name , too bad the momentum has been lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>starting to think.
It's a great name, too bad the momentum has been lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28139919</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>wastedlife</author>
	<datestamp>1243617660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>- Thunderbird</p></div><p>Vaguely similar in theme to Firefox, also the name of a car</p></div><p>I'm pretty sure the name thunderbird came before firefox. Originally it was called Minotaur when Firefox was called Phoenix. The Phoenix BIOS people complained of trademark violation, so Mozilla started calling it Mozilla Phoenix. Phoenix Technologies was still pissed so they renamed it Firebird. The Firebird database people then complained about the name. Again, Mozilla tried "Mozilla Firebird" before changing to Firefox. Thunderbird was named in reference to Firebird, but I'm not 100\% sure if that move was before or after the switch to Firefox.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- ThunderbirdVaguely similar in theme to Firefox , also the name of a carI 'm pretty sure the name thunderbird came before firefox .
Originally it was called Minotaur when Firefox was called Phoenix .
The Phoenix BIOS people complained of trademark violation , so Mozilla started calling it Mozilla Phoenix .
Phoenix Technologies was still pissed so they renamed it Firebird .
The Firebird database people then complained about the name .
Again , Mozilla tried " Mozilla Firebird " before changing to Firefox .
Thunderbird was named in reference to Firebird , but I 'm not 100 \ % sure if that move was before or after the switch to Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- ThunderbirdVaguely similar in theme to Firefox, also the name of a carI'm pretty sure the name thunderbird came before firefox.
Originally it was called Minotaur when Firefox was called Phoenix.
The Phoenix BIOS people complained of trademark violation, so Mozilla started calling it Mozilla Phoenix.
Phoenix Technologies was still pissed so they renamed it Firebird.
The Firebird database people then complained about the name.
Again, Mozilla tried "Mozilla Firebird" before changing to Firefox.
Thunderbird was named in reference to Firebird, but I'm not 100\% sure if that move was before or after the switch to Firefox.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128961</id>
	<title>Because it's badder.</title>
	<author>chrisbtoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243543800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Badda bing!
<br> <br>
Sorry if it's been done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Badda bing !
Sorry if it 's been done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Badda bing!
Sorry if it's been done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126023</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like live.com has today? Live has a big image loaded async after the page loads. It's always been snappy for me (it's been in production for quite a while, so I'm assuming it's "up to capacity", whatever that means). Since it's an async op, it doesn't stop you from going ahead and searching before the load is complete.</p><p>Oh, sorry, forgot it's slashdot... you probably haven't actually tried anything but the crowd-recommended solution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like live.com has today ?
Live has a big image loaded async after the page loads .
It 's always been snappy for me ( it 's been in production for quite a while , so I 'm assuming it 's " up to capacity " , whatever that means ) .
Since it 's an async op , it does n't stop you from going ahead and searching before the load is complete.Oh , sorry , forgot it 's slashdot... you probably have n't actually tried anything but the crowd-recommended solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like live.com has today?
Live has a big image loaded async after the page loads.
It's always been snappy for me (it's been in production for quite a while, so I'm assuming it's "up to capacity", whatever that means).
Since it's an async op, it doesn't stop you from going ahead and searching before the load is complete.Oh, sorry, forgot it's slashdot... you probably haven't actually tried anything but the crowd-recommended solution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130599</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And "google" is so descriptive, isn't it?  If you're going to go MS-bashing, at least borrow a brain cell from somewhere first.  Fuckwit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And " google " is so descriptive , is n't it ?
If you 're going to go MS-bashing , at least borrow a brain cell from somewhere first .
Fuckwit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And "google" is so descriptive, isn't it?
If you're going to go MS-bashing, at least borrow a brain cell from somewhere first.
Fuckwit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128837</id>
	<title>Yeesh.</title>
	<author>neiras</author>
	<datestamp>1243543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet another search engine?</p><p>Redundant. Redundant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another search engine ? Redundant .
Redundant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another search engine?Redundant.
Redundant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125797</id>
	<title>Well, good luck with that.</title>
	<author>tedgyz</author>
	<datestamp>1243534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The name has been changed to protect the guilty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The name has been changed to protect the guilty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The name has been changed to protect the guilty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125657</id>
	<title>Otto</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cherry site, Dude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cherry site , Dude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cherry site, Dude.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131467</id>
	<title>Re:We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>thane777</author>
	<datestamp>1243510980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who knew the machine the goes "Bing!" came from Microsoft?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who knew the machine the goes " Bing !
" came from Microsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who knew the machine the goes "Bing!
" came from Microsoft?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126729</id>
	<title>Hotels in Dublin</title>
	<author>TheNinjaroach</author>
	<datestamp>1243537560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course I didn't RTFA, but I did visit bing.com to watch a promotional video - which surprising enough <i>wasn't</i> done in Silverlight.  Two things about this promotional video really stuck out about how bad Microsoft really wants to be Google.<br> <br>The first thing that struck me was the name.  Over time Google's name has become a verb,  you can "Google It" (tm) for yourself.  So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by scheduling a series of marketing meetings for their droids to come up with a name that out-verbs the competition.  "Bing" there you have it, an uninspired and pathetic attempt to squeeze a brand name into our common vernacular.<br> <br>The second thing that really caught my attention in the video was the first search they show.  While the narrator goes on about revolutionary new ways to search the internet, he pulls up Bing to search for "Hotels in Dublin" - a natural way to search for hotels near Dublin that Google implemented into their mapping engine years ago.  Just as the search itself was ripped off from Google, so are the results.  A map of Dublin pops up with a number of icons, each representing a hotel exactly as Google did... years ago.<br> <br>Bing's marketing narrator continues on about these "new ways to search" that feel so familiar, and well, old.  I'm not convinced they have anything new to offer, but maybe if they keep saying "Bing" enough they will at least convince themselves.  I think the only people who will "Bing" anything in the near future are the same ones who have always used Live Search simply because it was available by default.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course I did n't RTFA , but I did visit bing.com to watch a promotional video - which surprising enough was n't done in Silverlight .
Two things about this promotional video really stuck out about how bad Microsoft really wants to be Google .
The first thing that struck me was the name .
Over time Google 's name has become a verb , you can " Google It " ( tm ) for yourself .
So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by scheduling a series of marketing meetings for their droids to come up with a name that out-verbs the competition .
" Bing " there you have it , an uninspired and pathetic attempt to squeeze a brand name into our common vernacular .
The second thing that really caught my attention in the video was the first search they show .
While the narrator goes on about revolutionary new ways to search the internet , he pulls up Bing to search for " Hotels in Dublin " - a natural way to search for hotels near Dublin that Google implemented into their mapping engine years ago .
Just as the search itself was ripped off from Google , so are the results .
A map of Dublin pops up with a number of icons , each representing a hotel exactly as Google did... years ago .
Bing 's marketing narrator continues on about these " new ways to search " that feel so familiar , and well , old .
I 'm not convinced they have anything new to offer , but maybe if they keep saying " Bing " enough they will at least convince themselves .
I think the only people who will " Bing " anything in the near future are the same ones who have always used Live Search simply because it was available by default .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course I didn't RTFA, but I did visit bing.com to watch a promotional video - which surprising enough wasn't done in Silverlight.
Two things about this promotional video really stuck out about how bad Microsoft really wants to be Google.
The first thing that struck me was the name.
Over time Google's name has become a verb,  you can "Google It" (tm) for yourself.
So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by scheduling a series of marketing meetings for their droids to come up with a name that out-verbs the competition.
"Bing" there you have it, an uninspired and pathetic attempt to squeeze a brand name into our common vernacular.
The second thing that really caught my attention in the video was the first search they show.
While the narrator goes on about revolutionary new ways to search the internet, he pulls up Bing to search for "Hotels in Dublin" - a natural way to search for hotels near Dublin that Google implemented into their mapping engine years ago.
Just as the search itself was ripped off from Google, so are the results.
A map of Dublin pops up with a number of icons, each representing a hotel exactly as Google did... years ago.
Bing's marketing narrator continues on about these "new ways to search" that feel so familiar, and well, old.
I'm not convinced they have anything new to offer, but maybe if they keep saying "Bing" enough they will at least convince themselves.
I think the only people who will "Bing" anything in the near future are the same ones who have always used Live Search simply because it was available by default.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135859</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>s1lverl0rd</author>
	<datestamp>1243630680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that it's utterly stupid, but Google isn't very descriptive for people that don't know it either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that it 's utterly stupid , but Google is n't very descriptive for people that do n't know it either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that it's utterly stupid, but Google isn't very descriptive for people that don't know it either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126215</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>harryandthehenderson</author>
	<datestamp>1243535820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well to be fair it's not really that much worse than <i>squirting</i> someone a song from your Zune.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well to be fair it 's not really that much worse than squirting someone a song from your Zune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well to be fair it's not really that much worse than squirting someone a song from your Zune.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</id>
	<title>Give up</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1243534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines. Its not profitable, labels you as a "Google clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle, you won't end up capturing any marketshare. Sure, there are some things that you could do with searching, such as desktop searches that aren't painfully slow that require tons of indexing, perhaps using algorithms to "guess" where files are placed? All that would be better for MS, but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine, how many do they have now? MSN, Live, and now Bing? Seriously, stop trying to be Google, you aren't and unless you happen to be really really good at what you do (and from past experiences in trying to be Google you aren't good at it) you won't get any marketshare despite how many ads you run and how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS should seriously just stop trying to " improve " search engines .
Its not profitable , labels you as a " Google clone " , and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle , you wo n't end up capturing any marketshare .
Sure , there are some things that you could do with searching , such as desktop searches that are n't painfully slow that require tons of indexing , perhaps using algorithms to " guess " where files are placed ?
All that would be better for MS , but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine , how many do they have now ?
MSN , Live , and now Bing ?
Seriously , stop trying to be Google , you are n't and unless you happen to be really really good at what you do ( and from past experiences in trying to be Google you are n't good at it ) you wo n't get any marketshare despite how many ads you run and how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines.
Its not profitable, labels you as a "Google clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle, you won't end up capturing any marketshare.
Sure, there are some things that you could do with searching, such as desktop searches that aren't painfully slow that require tons of indexing, perhaps using algorithms to "guess" where files are placed?
All that would be better for MS, but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine, how many do they have now?
MSN, Live, and now Bing?
Seriously, stop trying to be Google, you aren't and unless you happen to be really really good at what you do (and from past experiences in trying to be Google you aren't good at it) you won't get any marketshare despite how many ads you run and how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126365</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Un pobre guey</author>
	<datestamp>1243536300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is absolutely horrible. If I were a Microsoft Bing marketing drone, I would suddenly have gotten a disagreeable spurt of adrenaline into my abdominal circulation, goosebumps, the sudden urge to urinate, cold cold  sweat, an incipient migraine, and the urge to run. Run anywhere. Run far away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is absolutely horrible .
If I were a Microsoft Bing marketing drone , I would suddenly have gotten a disagreeable spurt of adrenaline into my abdominal circulation , goosebumps , the sudden urge to urinate , cold cold sweat , an incipient migraine , and the urge to run .
Run anywhere .
Run far away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is absolutely horrible.
If I were a Microsoft Bing marketing drone, I would suddenly have gotten a disagreeable spurt of adrenaline into my abdominal circulation, goosebumps, the sudden urge to urinate, cold cold  sweat, an incipient migraine, and the urge to run.
Run anywhere.
Run far away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198275</id>
	<title>Re:Bing!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244053920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://msbing.atspace.com/" title="atspace.com" rel="nofollow">Graphical Version</a> [atspace.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Graphical Version [ atspace.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Graphical Version [atspace.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125825</id>
	<title>BING stands for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But It's Not Google.</p><p>I guess M$ is tired of people saying "But it's not Microsoft" so they are turning the tables.</p><p>Maybe someday they will try turning the tables with better products.</p><p>HAHAHAHA.. like that would ever happen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But It 's Not Google.I guess M $ is tired of people saying " But it 's not Microsoft " so they are turning the tables.Maybe someday they will try turning the tables with better products.HAHAHAHA.. like that would ever happen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But It's Not Google.I guess M$ is tired of people saying "But it's not Microsoft" so they are turning the tables.Maybe someday they will try turning the tables with better products.HAHAHAHA.. like that would ever happen!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125907</id>
	<title>Dear MS. Bing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q: I'm feeling lonely, down and out, what will make me feel better? Please help me decide.</p><p>A: Easy. Upgrade to Vista Ultimate, then Windows 7 ultimate.  If that doesn't work buy a Zune, an X-Box 360, and a Surface.  <b>Bing-OOOO!</b> Problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : I 'm feeling lonely , down and out , what will make me feel better ?
Please help me decide.A : Easy .
Upgrade to Vista Ultimate , then Windows 7 ultimate .
If that does n't work buy a Zune , an X-Box 360 , and a Surface .
Bing-OOOO ! Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: I'm feeling lonely, down and out, what will make me feel better?
Please help me decide.A: Easy.
Upgrade to Vista Ultimate, then Windows 7 ultimate.
If that doesn't work buy a Zune, an X-Box 360, and a Surface.
Bing-OOOO! Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134201</id>
	<title>CA - Computer Associates - Could Learn From This</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Among Microsoft's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years. This is an incredibly wasteful policy.</p></div></blockquote><p>CA have renamed their products several times in the last few years which has resulted in great confusion and annoyance.</p><p>The overhaul of their website doesn't help either. I *STILL* can't find pages that I have bookmarked in the past. To be more specific, some pages are still there.. I just can't figure how to get to them using the menu.</p><p>It is lovely reporting to management that the procurement is for CA's 'SCM' software.<br>Oh, what's that?<br>"Software" "Change" "Manager"<br># Right. Ok. I got that we need software for change management and that CA has something we can use.<br>&gt; yes. It's called CA Software Change Manager<br># Okay. Right. So, this works for everything?<br>&gt; No. Just midrange. For mainframe it is "Software Change Manager for Mainframe"<br># Isn't that what you just said?<br>&gt; No. "Software" "Change" "Manager" is for midrange. "Software Change Manager for Mainframe" is for mainframe.<br># Okay. Right. Thank you for clearning that up...<br>&gt; *sigh* Listen. CA have two products. One is called "Harvest". It is for software change management on midrange. They also have a product called "Endevor". This is for software change managemenr for mainframe.<br># Why didn't you just say so?<br>&gt; *sigh* Because CA rebranded Harvest to 'SCM' and Endevor to 'SCM for Mainframe'.<br># That is confusion.<br>&gt; No. Really?</p><p>I've had this conversation at least 10 times now in meetings. There is a very good reason why you pick a NAME for your software - to identify it what it is, what it does, how it is used, who should use it.. etc. Giving it a bland generic name can be really annoying when it isn't used by everyone on the planet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Among Microsoft 's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years .
This is an incredibly wasteful policy.CA have renamed their products several times in the last few years which has resulted in great confusion and annoyance.The overhaul of their website does n't help either .
I * STILL * ca n't find pages that I have bookmarked in the past .
To be more specific , some pages are still there.. I just ca n't figure how to get to them using the menu.It is lovely reporting to management that the procurement is for CA 's 'SCM ' software.Oh , what 's that ?
" Software " " Change " " Manager " # Right .
Ok. I got that we need software for change management and that CA has something we can use. &gt; yes .
It 's called CA Software Change Manager # Okay .
Right. So , this works for everything ? &gt; No .
Just midrange .
For mainframe it is " Software Change Manager for Mainframe " # Is n't that what you just said ? &gt; No .
" Software " " Change " " Manager " is for midrange .
" Software Change Manager for Mainframe " is for mainframe. # Okay .
Right. Thank you for clearning that up... &gt; * sigh * Listen .
CA have two products .
One is called " Harvest " .
It is for software change management on midrange .
They also have a product called " Endevor " .
This is for software change managemenr for mainframe. # Why did n't you just say so ? &gt; * sigh * Because CA rebranded Harvest to 'SCM ' and Endevor to 'SCM for Mainframe'. # That is confusion. &gt; No .
Really ? I 've had this conversation at least 10 times now in meetings .
There is a very good reason why you pick a NAME for your software - to identify it what it is , what it does , how it is used , who should use it.. etc. Giving it a bland generic name can be really annoying when it is n't used by everyone on the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among Microsoft's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years.
This is an incredibly wasteful policy.CA have renamed their products several times in the last few years which has resulted in great confusion and annoyance.The overhaul of their website doesn't help either.
I *STILL* can't find pages that I have bookmarked in the past.
To be more specific, some pages are still there.. I just can't figure how to get to them using the menu.It is lovely reporting to management that the procurement is for CA's 'SCM' software.Oh, what's that?
"Software" "Change" "Manager"# Right.
Ok. I got that we need software for change management and that CA has something we can use.&gt; yes.
It's called CA Software Change Manager# Okay.
Right. So, this works for everything?&gt; No.
Just midrange.
For mainframe it is "Software Change Manager for Mainframe"# Isn't that what you just said?&gt; No.
"Software" "Change" "Manager" is for midrange.
"Software Change Manager for Mainframe" is for mainframe.# Okay.
Right. Thank you for clearning that up...&gt; *sigh* Listen.
CA have two products.
One is called "Harvest".
It is for software change management on midrange.
They also have a product called "Endevor".
This is for software change managemenr for mainframe.# Why didn't you just say so?&gt; *sigh* Because CA rebranded Harvest to 'SCM' and Endevor to 'SCM for Mainframe'.# That is confusion.&gt; No.
Really?I've had this conversation at least 10 times now in meetings.
There is a very good reason why you pick a NAME for your software - to identify it what it is, what it does, how it is used, who should use it.. etc. Giving it a bland generic name can be really annoying when it isn't used by everyone on the planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135263</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hum...Let' see..</p><ul><li>1 - Make crappy search engine.</li><li>2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine</li><li>3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look</li><li>4 - ??????</li><li>5 - PROFIT!!</li></ul><p>It's just that (4) isn't clear.</p></div><p>4 - GoTo 2</p><p>Crappy programming, I know. But hey, it's Microsoft! And then they are left wondering why they never reach the Profit-part...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hum...Let ' see..1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - ? ? ? ? ?
? 5 - PROFIT !
! It 's just that ( 4 ) is n't clear.4 - GoTo 2Crappy programming , I know .
But hey , it 's Microsoft !
And then they are left wondering why they never reach the Profit-part.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hum...Let' see..1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - ?????
?5 - PROFIT!
!It's just that (4) isn't clear.4 - GoTo 2Crappy programming, I know.
But hey, it's Microsoft!
And then they are left wondering why they never reach the Profit-part...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126871</id>
	<title>Chandler?</title>
	<author>tikram</author>
	<datestamp>1243537920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did they name it after Chandler "not gay" Bing?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they name it after Chandler " not gay " Bing ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they name it after Chandler "not gay" Bing?
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134541</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1243530060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bada Bing!" is what you proclaim when you actually find something on But It No Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bada Bing !
" is what you proclaim when you actually find something on But It No Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bada Bing!
" is what you proclaim when you actually find something on But It No Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135125</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>hawkingradiation</author>
	<datestamp>1243535700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>4. is the same as 1, 2 and 3 ad nauseum: doing "something" but will never result in 5. Time for an organizational shuffle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>4. is the same as 1 , 2 and 3 ad nauseum : doing " something " but will never result in 5 .
Time for an organizational shuffle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4. is the same as 1, 2 and 3 ad nauseum: doing "something" but will never result in 5.
Time for an organizational shuffle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130277</id>
	<title>The sound of "found": Bob Hope</title>
	<author>David Gerard</author>
	<datestamp>1243505460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This morning, our dear leader Steve Ballmer is unveiling our completely new search service, unrelated to anything we at Microsoft have ever done before: Bob Hope.

</p><p>We spent lots of time listening to you, except when you told us how much MSN Search^W Live Search^W Kumo sucked &rsquo;cause you're just <i>wrong</i> about that, to learn which buzzwordy Web 2.0 thingies you use search for today. Finding a webpage that has anything to do with the search terms you entered is so <i>pass&eacute;</i>, dahling.

</p><p>So today we're introducing a new kind of search, that goes beyond traditional search engines that do tedious things like find stuff, to <i>instead</i> help you make faster, more informed decisions. (Windows 7 is <i>peachy keen</i>, by the way.) We think of Bob Hope as a <i>Decision Engine</i>. We've sued Stephen Wolfram into atomic dust using our patents on FAT and Mono, co-opted the Wolfram Alpha engine and swapped Mathematica for Visual Basic and Wolfram's brain for the exhumed corpse of Bob Hope.

</p><p>So why did we pick Bob Hope as the new brand name? We needed a brand that was as fresh and new as our approach. It needed to be like the product: optimized for the Internet. A name that was memorable, short, easy to spell, and that would function well as a URL around the world.

</p><p>And just look at these results!

</p><p> <i>What do we want?</i> <br> <b>Braaains.</b> <br> <i>When do we want them?</i> <br> <b>Braaains.</b> <br> <i>What do I need to run Windows 7?</i> <br> <b>Braaains.</b> <br> <i>What's Bill Gates got that means you should buy everything you can from the company he founded?</i> <br> <b>Braaains.</b> <br> <i>What's the final proof of Steve Ballmer's equal genius to Steve Jobs?</i> <br> <b>Vistaaa.</b>

</p><p>This is something new, something improved! You need to try it! It'll give so much more betterer results than that other search engine we can't name because Steve will wedge another chair up our butts! Please, come and try our new and improved service! FOR GOD'S SAKE TRY THE DAMN SERVICE. <b>OR THE PUPPY GETS IT.</b> We're Microsoft. We're <i>serious as a heart attack</i> on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This morning , our dear leader Steve Ballmer is unveiling our completely new search service , unrelated to anything we at Microsoft have ever done before : Bob Hope .
We spent lots of time listening to you , except when you told us how much MSN Search ^ W Live Search ^ W Kumo sucked    cause you 're just wrong about that , to learn which buzzwordy Web 2.0 thingies you use search for today .
Finding a webpage that has anything to do with the search terms you entered is so pass   , dahling .
So today we 're introducing a new kind of search , that goes beyond traditional search engines that do tedious things like find stuff , to instead help you make faster , more informed decisions .
( Windows 7 is peachy keen , by the way .
) We think of Bob Hope as a Decision Engine .
We 've sued Stephen Wolfram into atomic dust using our patents on FAT and Mono , co-opted the Wolfram Alpha engine and swapped Mathematica for Visual Basic and Wolfram 's brain for the exhumed corpse of Bob Hope .
So why did we pick Bob Hope as the new brand name ?
We needed a brand that was as fresh and new as our approach .
It needed to be like the product : optimized for the Internet .
A name that was memorable , short , easy to spell , and that would function well as a URL around the world .
And just look at these results !
What do we want ?
Braaains. When do we want them ?
Braaains. What do I need to run Windows 7 ?
Braaains. What 's Bill Gates got that means you should buy everything you can from the company he founded ?
Braaains. What 's the final proof of Steve Ballmer 's equal genius to Steve Jobs ?
Vistaaa . This is something new , something improved !
You need to try it !
It 'll give so much more betterer results than that other search engine we ca n't name because Steve will wedge another chair up our butts !
Please , come and try our new and improved service !
FOR GOD 'S SAKE TRY THE DAMN SERVICE .
OR THE PUPPY GETS IT .
We 're Microsoft .
We 're serious as a heart attack on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This morning, our dear leader Steve Ballmer is unveiling our completely new search service, unrelated to anything we at Microsoft have ever done before: Bob Hope.
We spent lots of time listening to you, except when you told us how much MSN Search^W Live Search^W Kumo sucked ’cause you're just wrong about that, to learn which buzzwordy Web 2.0 thingies you use search for today.
Finding a webpage that has anything to do with the search terms you entered is so passé, dahling.
So today we're introducing a new kind of search, that goes beyond traditional search engines that do tedious things like find stuff, to instead help you make faster, more informed decisions.
(Windows 7 is peachy keen, by the way.
) We think of Bob Hope as a Decision Engine.
We've sued Stephen Wolfram into atomic dust using our patents on FAT and Mono, co-opted the Wolfram Alpha engine and swapped Mathematica for Visual Basic and Wolfram's brain for the exhumed corpse of Bob Hope.
So why did we pick Bob Hope as the new brand name?
We needed a brand that was as fresh and new as our approach.
It needed to be like the product: optimized for the Internet.
A name that was memorable, short, easy to spell, and that would function well as a URL around the world.
And just look at these results!
What do we want?
Braaains.  When do we want them?
Braaains.  What do I need to run Windows 7?
Braaains.  What's Bill Gates got that means you should buy everything you can from the company he founded?
Braaains.  What's the final proof of Steve Ballmer's equal genius to Steve Jobs?
Vistaaa.

This is something new, something improved!
You need to try it!
It'll give so much more betterer results than that other search engine we can't name because Steve will wedge another chair up our butts!
Please, come and try our new and improved service!
FOR GOD'S SAKE TRY THE DAMN SERVICE.
OR THE PUPPY GETS IT.
We're Microsoft.
We're serious as a heart attack on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130511</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll give you google has a clean, no-nonsense interface, but actually try Live/Bing before you decide it's slow.</p><p>The background image is loaded asynchronously after the page is complete and accepting input. It's actually kind of slick.</p><p>Maybe you like or dislike the appearance, but it is quite snappy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll give you google has a clean , no-nonsense interface , but actually try Live/Bing before you decide it 's slow.The background image is loaded asynchronously after the page is complete and accepting input .
It 's actually kind of slick.Maybe you like or dislike the appearance , but it is quite snappy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll give you google has a clean, no-nonsense interface, but actually try Live/Bing before you decide it's slow.The background image is loaded asynchronously after the page is complete and accepting input.
It's actually kind of slick.Maybe you like or dislike the appearance, but it is quite snappy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132243</id>
	<title>We finally know what phase 2 is!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243514880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phase 1: Collect Underpants<br>Phase 2: Bing<br>Phase 3: Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phase 1 : Collect UnderpantsPhase 2 : BingPhase 3 : Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phase 1: Collect UnderpantsPhase 2: BingPhase 3: Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130797</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Arterion</author>
	<datestamp>1243507740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Bing Bong Brothers?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4iiyRv\_NrQ" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4iiyRv\_NrQ</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>Yeah, I don't really like that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Bing Bong Brothers ? http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = z4iiyRv \ _NrQ [ youtube.com ] Yeah , I do n't really like that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Bing Bong Brothers?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4iiyRv\_NrQ [youtube.com]Yeah, I don't really like that one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28137623</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1243606260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actualy it's:</p><ul> <li>1 - Make crappy search engine.</li><li>2 - DO </li><li>3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look</li><li>4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look</li><li>5 - ???</li><li>6 - while (Fail) </li><li>7 - PROFIT!!</li></ul><p>They're still in step 3.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></div><p>I think it is more like that...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actualy it 's : 1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - DO 3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look5 - ? ?
? 6 - while ( Fail ) 7 - PROFIT !
! They 're still in step 3 .
        -dZ.I think it is more like that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actualy it's: 1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - DO 3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look5 - ??
?6 - while (Fail) 7 - PROFIT!
!They're still in step 3.
        -dZ.I think it is more like that...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127105</id>
	<title>BBC</title>
	<author>damona</author>
	<datestamp>1243538640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8070790.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">BBC article</a> [bbc.co.uk] has some pretty interesting comments from Paul Stoddart, Microsoft UK search lead.<p><div class="quote"><p>"Google haven't been able to innovate a lot of the UI"</p></div><p>Huh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The BBC article [ bbc.co.uk ] has some pretty interesting comments from Paul Stoddart , Microsoft UK search lead .
" Google have n't been able to innovate a lot of the UI " Huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BBC article [bbc.co.uk] has some pretty interesting comments from Paul Stoddart, Microsoft UK search lead.
"Google haven't been able to innovate a lot of the UI"Huh?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135293</id>
	<title>When?</title>
	<author>mathman47</author>
	<datestamp>1243537260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody know when Bing will be released?  So far I haven't able to Bing (or Google) that info.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody know when Bing will be released ?
So far I have n't able to Bing ( or Google ) that info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody know when Bing will be released?
So far I haven't able to Bing (or Google) that info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28142211</id>
	<title>Me too!</title>
	<author>clevergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1243627860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's the same sound I make every time I come to a conclusion...
This may be the search engine for me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the same sound I make every time I come to a conclusion.. . This may be the search engine for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the same sound I make every time I come to a conclusion...
This may be the search engine for me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28143521</id>
	<title>oblig</title>
	<author>RexDevious</author>
	<datestamp>1243590240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bing!"</p><p>That means your business model is <i>still alive</i>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bing !
" That means your business model is still alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bing!
"That means your business model is still alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</id>
	<title>Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>skrolle2</author>
	<datestamp>1243533720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Here, let me bing that for you."</p><p>Hmmmm... No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Here , let me bing that for you. " Hmmmm.. .
No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Here, let me bing that for you."Hmmmm...
No.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132619</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1243516740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bing! from the company that brought <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/108908.asp" title="seattlepi.com">squirting</a> [seattlepi.com] to the masses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing !
from the company that brought squirting [ seattlepi.com ] to the masses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing!
from the company that brought squirting [seattlepi.com] to the masses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127749</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bling!</p><p>The net seems to be down, here let me ping Bing, er<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,Bling...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bling ! The net seems to be down , here let me ping Bing , er ,Bling.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bling!The net seems to be down, here let me ping Bing, er ,Bling...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128447</id>
	<title>Re:The name is nto their problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come now, it's a search engine. How hard can it be to change search engines? All Microsoft needs to do is get it to show up by default in IE (or OEM installations of other browsers) and they're golden.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come now , it 's a search engine .
How hard can it be to change search engines ?
All Microsoft needs to do is get it to show up by default in IE ( or OEM installations of other browsers ) and they 're golden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come now, it's a search engine.
How hard can it be to change search engines?
All Microsoft needs to do is get it to show up by default in IE (or OEM installations of other browsers) and they're golden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125715</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That said it's a marked improvement on Kumo.</p><p>"Here, let me kumo that for you."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That said it 's a marked improvement on Kumo .
" Here , let me kumo that for you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That said it's a marked improvement on Kumo.
"Here, let me kumo that for you.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128217</id>
	<title>Named after Bing Crosby?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From Wikipedia:</p><p>"After Crosby's death, his eldest son, Gary, wrote a highly critical memoir, <i>Going My Own Way</i>, <b>depicting [Bing] as cold, remote, and both physically and psychologically abusive.</b>"</p><p>I think it's a good name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From Wikipedia : " After Crosby 's death , his eldest son , Gary , wrote a highly critical memoir , Going My Own Way , depicting [ Bing ] as cold , remote , and both physically and psychologically abusive .
" I think it 's a good name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Wikipedia:"After Crosby's death, his eldest son, Gary, wrote a highly critical memoir, Going My Own Way, depicting [Bing] as cold, remote, and both physically and psychologically abusive.
"I think it's a good name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130009</id>
	<title>Re:Bing - the sound of being ricocheted all over M</title>
	<author>rts008</author>
	<datestamp>1243504500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Bing" huh, it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think...</p></div><p>[my mental image completed this sentence as...]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricochet\_Rabbit" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Ricochet Rabbit and Droop-a-long Coyote.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><b> <i>"Bing, bing, BING!, Ricochet Rabbit!"</i> </b></p><p>IMHO, Microsoft is not anywhere near as cool as Ricochet Rabbit!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bing " huh , it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think... [ my mental image completed this sentence as... ] ...of Ricochet Rabbit and Droop-a-long Coyote .
[ wikipedia.org ] " Bing , bing , BING ! , Ricochet Rabbit !
" IMHO , Microsoft is not anywhere near as cool as Ricochet Rabbit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bing" huh, it reminds me of the sound of a ricochet and than makes me think...[my mental image completed this sentence as...] ...of Ricochet Rabbit and Droop-a-long Coyote.
[wikipedia.org] "Bing, bing, BING!, Ricochet Rabbit!
" IMHO, Microsoft is not anywhere near as cool as Ricochet Rabbit!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130461</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1243506120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails? Bong?</p></div></blockquote><p>
&lt;sound="Game show fail"&gt;Bing bow?&lt;/sound&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ? Bing bow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong?
Bing bow?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28176627</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243867680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or simply, Bing Is Not Good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or simply , Bing Is Not Good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or simply, Bing Is Not Good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335</id>
	<title>Long-term pattern</title>
	<author>psydeshow</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Among Microsoft's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years. This is  an incredibly wasteful policy. Every time they enact one of these name changes they:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - throw out years' worth of marketing effort<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - break documentation and references throughout their website<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - break third-party web resources, including howtos, forum advice, and other forms of community support<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - force everyone who has to support the product to change all of their references, documentation, marketing, etc.</p><p>Why MS shareholders and partners don't see name churn as having a real, damaging impact on the company's long-term success is beyond me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Among Microsoft 's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years .
This is an incredibly wasteful policy .
Every time they enact one of these name changes they :     - throw out years ' worth of marketing effort     - break documentation and references throughout their website     - break third-party web resources , including howtos , forum advice , and other forms of community support     - force everyone who has to support the product to change all of their references , documentation , marketing , etc.Why MS shareholders and partners do n't see name churn as having a real , damaging impact on the company 's long-term success is beyond me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among Microsoft's many problems as a company is that they seem to systematically change the names of their products every few years.
This is  an incredibly wasteful policy.
Every time they enact one of these name changes they:
    - throw out years' worth of marketing effort
    - break documentation and references throughout their website
    - break third-party web resources, including howtos, forum advice, and other forms of community support
    - force everyone who has to support the product to change all of their references, documentation, marketing, etc.Why MS shareholders and partners don't see name churn as having a real, damaging impact on the company's long-term success is beyond me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130769</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1243507680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A more apt name from Steve would have been "Fling"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'm thinking chairs here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A more apt name from Steve would have been " Fling " ... I 'm thinking chairs here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A more apt name from Steve would have been "Fling" ... I'm thinking chairs here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125955</id>
	<title>Obviously they didn't research the name...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing = Swedish slang for "Dumb"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing = Swedish slang for " Dumb "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing = Swedish slang for "Dumb"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126321</id>
	<title>Scribblings on the wall?</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It's a great name, too bad the momentum has been lost.</i> <br> <br>And there lies the rub. Sure, there are plenty of us who still harbour deep suspicicions about Google and its motives, but those reservations pale by comparison to those surrounding Microsoft. <br> <br>Once all the hype about MSN search and Windows 7 has died down, I wonder if Microsoft might be forced into a position where its most secure bastion is MSOffice. Whatever we might think of MS, the latter is still probably the only one of their products that really qualifies as a "killer".<br> <br>Disclaimer: my personal preference is for OpenOffice or NeoOffice, dependent on platform.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a great name , too bad the momentum has been lost .
And there lies the rub .
Sure , there are plenty of us who still harbour deep suspicicions about Google and its motives , but those reservations pale by comparison to those surrounding Microsoft .
Once all the hype about MSN search and Windows 7 has died down , I wonder if Microsoft might be forced into a position where its most secure bastion is MSOffice .
Whatever we might think of MS , the latter is still probably the only one of their products that really qualifies as a " killer " .
Disclaimer : my personal preference is for OpenOffice or NeoOffice , dependent on platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a great name, too bad the momentum has been lost.
And there lies the rub.
Sure, there are plenty of us who still harbour deep suspicicions about Google and its motives, but those reservations pale by comparison to those surrounding Microsoft.
Once all the hype about MSN search and Windows 7 has died down, I wonder if Microsoft might be forced into a position where its most secure bastion is MSOffice.
Whatever we might think of MS, the latter is still probably the only one of their products that really qualifies as a "killer".
Disclaimer: my personal preference is for OpenOffice or NeoOffice, dependent on platform.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127333</id>
	<title>Re:Bing!</title>
	<author>Kozz</author>
	<datestamp>1243539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And let's not forget...</p><p>Phil:  Listen, Ned, I don't know what you're doing later, but I've got a hotel room, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And let 's not forget...Phil : Listen , Ned , I do n't know what you 're doing later , but I 've got a hotel room , and .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let's not forget...Phil:  Listen, Ned, I don't know what you're doing later, but I've got a hotel room, and ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130061</id>
	<title>Bing?</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1243504740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is the the sound a flying chair makes when it hit a developer's skull when Ballmer throws a fit about being owned online?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the the sound a flying chair makes when it hit a developer 's skull when Ballmer throws a fit about being owned online ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the the sound a flying chair makes when it hit a developer's skull when Ballmer throws a fit about being owned online?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132603</id>
	<title>I'll guess it makes a sound more like...</title>
	<author>pbrooks100</author>
	<datestamp>1243516620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>thud.  Google FTW!</htmltext>
<tokenext>thud .
Google FTW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thud.
Google FTW!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126331</id>
	<title>Name it Bling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have named it <b>Bling</b>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p Yeah, they definitely need more Bling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have named it Bling... : p Yeah , they definitely need more Bling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have named it Bling... :p Yeah, they definitely need more Bling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136341</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1243593840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bong: Searches for sure."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bong : Searches for sure .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bong: Searches for sure.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130641</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1243506960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>All that would be better for MS, but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine, how many do they have now? MSN, Live, and now Bing?</i></p><p>You forgot Wolfram | Alpha.  Since I started using it, I've never needed anything else - a true Google killer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All that would be better for MS , but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine , how many do they have now ?
MSN , Live , and now Bing ? You forgot Wolfram | Alpha .
Since I started using it , I 've never needed anything else - a true Google killer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All that would be better for MS, but instead they go into the already saturated market with yet another search engine, how many do they have now?
MSN, Live, and now Bing?You forgot Wolfram | Alpha.
Since I started using it, I've never needed anything else - a true Google killer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128069</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We could apply the same logic 10 years ago.<p><div class="quote"><p>Google should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines. Its not profitable, labels you as a "Yahoo! clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Yahoo! and My Yahoo!, you won't end up capturing any marketshare.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could apply the same logic 10 years ago.Google should seriously just stop trying to " improve " search engines .
Its not profitable , labels you as a " Yahoo !
clone " , and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Yahoo !
and My Yahoo ! , you wo n't end up capturing any marketshare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could apply the same logic 10 years ago.Google should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines.
Its not profitable, labels you as a "Yahoo!
clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Yahoo!
and My Yahoo!, you won't end up capturing any marketshare.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125783</id>
	<title>Bing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could this BE any lamer a name?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this BE any lamer a name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this BE any lamer a name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126341</id>
	<title>what's in a name? this time, truth:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing\_(mining)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing\_(mining)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing \ _ ( mining ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing\_(mining) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126115</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>ILikeRed</author>
	<datestamp>1243535460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Punxsutawney Phil! Thank you, I was racking my brain for a reference I knew I was missing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Punxsutawney Phil !
Thank you , I was racking my brain for a reference I knew I was missing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Punxsutawney Phil!
Thank you, I was racking my brain for a reference I knew I was missing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129671</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Speare</author>
	<datestamp>1243503000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer "binge," but "bung" beats "bling."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer " binge , " but " bung " beats " bling .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer "binge," but "bung" beats "bling.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129151</id>
	<title>Wii</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243501260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the Slashdot crowd's reaction to a new brand has any predictive power, then Bing is going to be a big hit.</p><p><a href="http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/27/1625208" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/27/1625208</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the Slashdot crowd 's reaction to a new brand has any predictive power , then Bing is going to be a big hit.http : //games.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 06/04/27/1625208 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the Slashdot crowd's reaction to a new brand has any predictive power, then Bing is going to be a big hit.http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/27/1625208 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128833</id>
	<title>What does Wolfram Alpha know about Bing?</title>
	<author>anderesa</author>
	<datestamp>1243543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q : What computational answer does Wolfram Alpha return about Bing as input?<br>A : Language spoken by 1200 people in Papua New Guinea.</p><p>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=bing&amp;t=igg01</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : What computational answer does Wolfram Alpha return about Bing as input ? A : Language spoken by 1200 people in Papua New Guinea.http : //www.wolframalpha.com/input/ ? i = bing&amp;t = igg01</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q : What computational answer does Wolfram Alpha return about Bing as input?A : Language spoken by 1200 people in Papua New Guinea.http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=bing&amp;t=igg01</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128925</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>geobeck</author>
	<datestamp>1243543680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Steve-o was the one naming it, it would be called the "FuckingKill" search engine.</p><p>Well, the search action would be a lot more catchy than "Make sure you bing that company before buying anything from them."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Steve-o was the one naming it , it would be called the " FuckingKill " search engine.Well , the search action would be a lot more catchy than " Make sure you bing that company before buying anything from them .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Steve-o was the one naming it, it would be called the "FuckingKill" search engine.Well, the search action would be a lot more catchy than "Make sure you bing that company before buying anything from them.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127947</id>
	<title>MS who decides?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its the MS "Random Word Monkey's" fault<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,Better not make it mad or it will Squirt you with Its Zune,or just throw a chair at you</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its the MS " Random Word Monkey 's " fault ,Better not make it mad or it will Squirt you with Its Zune,or just throw a chair at you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its the MS "Random Word Monkey's" fault ,Better not make it mad or it will Squirt you with Its Zune,or just throw a chair at you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127467</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>SaDan</author>
	<datestamp>1243539660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cash back stuff is tied affiliate marketing/advertising, which is what MS is trying to tie in to their search results.  I see mention of <a href="http://farecast.com/" title="farecast.com" rel="nofollow">http://farecast.com/</a> [farecast.com] in other comments, but I believe most of their "tech" for the cash back program was pulled out of <a href="http://jellyfish.com/" title="jellyfish.com" rel="nofollow">http://jellyfish.com/</a> [jellyfish.com] .  MS purchased jellyfish.com a while back, sucked all the goodness out of them, and tossed the carcass aside recently during layoffs.</p><p>There are still plenty of really good sites for finding deals, and <a href="http://fatwallet.com/" title="fatwallet.com" rel="nofollow">http://fatwallet.com/</a> [fatwallet.com] offers a competitive cash back program as well.  Why wade through all the meaningless search results when trying to shop online, when you could go some place that ONLY has good deals?  This is why MS's search will fail as a revenue generating product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cash back stuff is tied affiliate marketing/advertising , which is what MS is trying to tie in to their search results .
I see mention of http : //farecast.com/ [ farecast.com ] in other comments , but I believe most of their " tech " for the cash back program was pulled out of http : //jellyfish.com/ [ jellyfish.com ] .
MS purchased jellyfish.com a while back , sucked all the goodness out of them , and tossed the carcass aside recently during layoffs.There are still plenty of really good sites for finding deals , and http : //fatwallet.com/ [ fatwallet.com ] offers a competitive cash back program as well .
Why wade through all the meaningless search results when trying to shop online , when you could go some place that ONLY has good deals ?
This is why MS 's search will fail as a revenue generating product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cash back stuff is tied affiliate marketing/advertising, which is what MS is trying to tie in to their search results.
I see mention of http://farecast.com/ [farecast.com] in other comments, but I believe most of their "tech" for the cash back program was pulled out of http://jellyfish.com/ [jellyfish.com] .
MS purchased jellyfish.com a while back, sucked all the goodness out of them, and tossed the carcass aside recently during layoffs.There are still plenty of really good sites for finding deals, and http://fatwallet.com/ [fatwallet.com] offers a competitive cash back program as well.
Why wade through all the meaningless search results when trying to shop online, when you could go some place that ONLY has good deals?
This is why MS's search will fail as a revenue generating product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128949</id>
	<title>BING-O?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like Micro$oft is one letter short again...</p><p>Or is that pronounced like "binge" - as in "I was on a searching binge all night trying to find a real search engine".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like Micro $ oft is one letter short again...Or is that pronounced like " binge " - as in " I was on a searching binge all night trying to find a real search engine " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like Micro$oft is one letter short again...Or is that pronounced like "binge" - as in "I was on a searching binge all night trying to find a real search engine".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130195</id>
	<title>You can cover a piece of poop in gold....</title>
	<author>JasonWM</author>
	<datestamp>1243505220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but all you have is a gold plated piece of poop</htmltext>
<tokenext>but all you have is a gold plated piece of poop</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but all you have is a gold plated piece of poop</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, on a web site focused on FOSS the readership will now complain about the name selected by Microsoft for their search engine.</p><p>Some examples of the naming accumen of the FOSS crowd:<br>- Ogg Vorbis<br>- Gimp<br>- Apache<br>- IceWeasel<br>- Thunderbird<br>- X<br>- Gnome<br>- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with K<br>- Gnu<br>- A thousand other recursive acronyms<br>- etc etc etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , on a web site focused on FOSS the readership will now complain about the name selected by Microsoft for their search engine.Some examples of the naming accumen of the FOSS crowd : - Ogg Vorbis- Gimp- Apache- IceWeasel- Thunderbird- X- Gnome- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with K- Gnu- A thousand other recursive acronyms- etc etc etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, on a web site focused on FOSS the readership will now complain about the name selected by Microsoft for their search engine.Some examples of the naming accumen of the FOSS crowd:- Ogg Vorbis- Gimp- Apache- IceWeasel- Thunderbird- X- Gnome- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with K- Gnu- A thousand other recursive acronyms- etc etc etc</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125677</id>
	<title>quarterly loss versus sales?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in one sentence, you attempted to compare Microsoft's posting a loss on search with Google's 4.6B in 'sales'.</p><p>you're comparing apples and oranges, aren't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in one sentence , you attempted to compare Microsoft 's posting a loss on search with Google 's 4.6B in 'sales'.you 're comparing apples and oranges , are n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in one sentence, you attempted to compare Microsoft's posting a loss on search with Google's 4.6B in 'sales'.you're comparing apples and oranges, aren't you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126225</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and the worse of all</p><p>- Microsoft</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and the worse of all- Microsoft</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the worse of all- Microsoft</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126749</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they still need a theme song for their upcoming marketing campaign.</p><p>perhaps "My Bing-a-Ling"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they still need a theme song for their upcoming marketing campaign.perhaps " My Bing-a-Ling "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they still need a theme song for their upcoming marketing campaign.perhaps "My Bing-a-Ling"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130435</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1243506060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice loop unrolling!  Does that make it go faster?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice loop unrolling !
Does that make it go faster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice loop unrolling!
Does that make it go faster?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28139109</id>
	<title>Faulty financual comparison, 5 yard penalty.</title>
	<author>dj\_segfault</author>
	<datestamp>1243613340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shame on the author for comparing MSFT's net profit/loss to Google's gross sales.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shame on the author for comparing MSFT 's net profit/loss to Google 's gross sales .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shame on the author for comparing MSFT's net profit/loss to Google's gross sales.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129477</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>seandiggity</author>
	<datestamp>1243502400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</p></div><p>I'm no M$ fanboi, but I'm gonna have to let them off the hook for the name choice.  Yahoo! and Google are also utterly stupid and non-descriptive names for search engines.  Microsoft is trying to create buzz and picked a word that people might actually use as a verb, like Google.  I don't think that'll happen, but I guess one never knows.  I can think of worse names; at least they didn't use a <a href="http://www.dotomator.com/" title="dotomator.com" rel="nofollow">Web 2.0 name generator</a> [dotomator.com] for this...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine , anyway.I 'm no M $ fanboi , but I 'm gon na have to let them off the hook for the name choice .
Yahoo ! and Google are also utterly stupid and non-descriptive names for search engines .
Microsoft is trying to create buzz and picked a word that people might actually use as a verb , like Google .
I do n't think that 'll happen , but I guess one never knows .
I can think of worse names ; at least they did n't use a Web 2.0 name generator [ dotomator.com ] for this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.I'm no M$ fanboi, but I'm gonna have to let them off the hook for the name choice.
Yahoo! and Google are also utterly stupid and non-descriptive names for search engines.
Microsoft is trying to create buzz and picked a word that people might actually use as a verb, like Google.
I don't think that'll happen, but I guess one never knows.
I can think of worse names; at least they didn't use a Web 2.0 name generator [dotomator.com] for this...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126399</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1243536420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>But giving money back on "great products?" Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick? Smells faintly like desperation, that does. I guess we'll see.</i> <br>
<br>
It's called Live Search Cashback at the moment. That's the only time I've used Live Search. Last fall I bought $1600 bucks worth of stuff for $1200 thanks to 25\% cashback on eBay "buy it now" purchases. If MS wants to help me buy expensive stuff, then more power to them. But yeah, it absolutely reeks of desperation on their part.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But giving money back on " great products ?
" Is that like discounts on MS software , or some other silly gimmick ?
Smells faintly like desperation , that does .
I guess we 'll see .
It 's called Live Search Cashback at the moment .
That 's the only time I 've used Live Search .
Last fall I bought $ 1600 bucks worth of stuff for $ 1200 thanks to 25 \ % cashback on eBay " buy it now " purchases .
If MS wants to help me buy expensive stuff , then more power to them .
But yeah , it absolutely reeks of desperation on their part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But giving money back on "great products?
" Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick?
Smells faintly like desperation, that does.
I guess we'll see.
It's called Live Search Cashback at the moment.
That's the only time I've used Live Search.
Last fall I bought $1600 bucks worth of stuff for $1200 thanks to 25\% cashback on eBay "buy it now" purchases.
If MS wants to help me buy expensive stuff, then more power to them.
But yeah, it absolutely reeks of desperation on their part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125983</id>
	<title>Re:We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>DiscountBorg(TM)</author>
	<datestamp>1243534920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*covers ears*  Don't say that word!  Suffice to say, is one of the words the Knights of Ni cannot hear!</htmltext>
<tokenext>* covers ears * Do n't say that word !
Suffice to say , is one of the words the Knights of Ni can not hear !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*covers ears*  Don't say that word!
Suffice to say, is one of the words the Knights of Ni cannot hear!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130783</id>
	<title>Hey Chandler</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1243507740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey Chandler, Chandler, Chandler Bing.</p><p>I'm sorry but these guys at Microsoft just need to give up software and sell XBOXes and Zunes and leave the rest of the world to clean up their mess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey Chandler , Chandler , Chandler Bing.I 'm sorry but these guys at Microsoft just need to give up software and sell XBOXes and Zunes and leave the rest of the world to clean up their mess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey Chandler, Chandler, Chandler Bing.I'm sorry but these guys at Microsoft just need to give up software and sell XBOXes and Zunes and leave the rest of the world to clean up their mess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235</id>
	<title>The name is nto their problem</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1243535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think about it.  If there was no "Google" already, and Microsoft choose that as a name, we would all be saying how dorky it was.  Same goes for "yahoo" or "skype" or any number of web company names you could pick from a hat.</p><p> Their problem is that they really have to come up with something that is a few orders of magnitude better than Google or its not worth switching.  It can't be "as good" or even "a little better."  Its got to be way way better than google (just like how google was way better than everyone else when they first showed up).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about it .
If there was no " Google " already , and Microsoft choose that as a name , we would all be saying how dorky it was .
Same goes for " yahoo " or " skype " or any number of web company names you could pick from a hat .
Their problem is that they really have to come up with something that is a few orders of magnitude better than Google or its not worth switching .
It ca n't be " as good " or even " a little better .
" Its got to be way way better than google ( just like how google was way better than everyone else when they first showed up ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about it.
If there was no "Google" already, and Microsoft choose that as a name, we would all be saying how dorky it was.
Same goes for "yahoo" or "skype" or any number of web company names you could pick from a hat.
Their problem is that they really have to come up with something that is a few orders of magnitude better than Google or its not worth switching.
It can't be "as good" or even "a little better.
"  Its got to be way way better than google (just like how google was way better than everyone else when they first showed up).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127773</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1243540500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Microsoft <strong>staggers in the general direction of</strong> where the money is.</p></div></blockquote><p>

There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft staggers in the general direction of where the money is .
There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft staggers in the general direction of where the money is.
There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28137713</id>
	<title>To hell with karma</title>
	<author>'Tractor' Barry</author>
	<datestamp>1243606800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly all this did was remind me of a (very) poor joke (which should really be said in a Scottish accent).</p><p>Q: What's the difference between Bing Crosby and Walt Disney ?<br>A: Bing sings and Walt disnae.</p><p>Sorry about that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly all this did was remind me of a ( very ) poor joke ( which should really be said in a Scottish accent ) .Q : What 's the difference between Bing Crosby and Walt Disney ? A : Bing sings and Walt disnae.Sorry about that : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly all this did was remind me of a (very) poor joke (which should really be said in a Scottish accent).Q: What's the difference between Bing Crosby and Walt Disney ?A: Bing sings and Walt disnae.Sorry about that :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125869</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot 'Ubuntu'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot 'Ubuntu'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot 'Ubuntu'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127161</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243538820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</p></div><p>Is Google any more descriptive?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine , anyway.Is Google any more descriptive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.Is Google any more descriptive?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129703</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid name</title>
	<author>tedgyz</author>
	<datestamp>1243503120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably feel as motivated as the Zune team.</p><p>What's that?  You want me to beat my head against the wall?  What?  I should lookup futile in the dictionary?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably feel as motivated as the Zune team.What 's that ?
You want me to beat my head against the wall ?
What ? I should lookup futile in the dictionary ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably feel as motivated as the Zune team.What's that?
You want me to beat my head against the wall?
What?  I should lookup futile in the dictionary?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127797</id>
	<title>Competition is good for everyone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so, everyone saying for M$ to give it up, I say keep going. We need competition and if everyone had the same attitide most have on this post, we would not have any. I personally never use Live Search, but thankfully they are there to ensure Google does not have a clear road to do whatever they want. It was M$ who stopped the Google/Yahoo ad debacle.<br>So, keep it up M$ we need competition. Good or bad....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so , everyone saying for M $ to give it up , I say keep going .
We need competition and if everyone had the same attitide most have on this post , we would not have any .
I personally never use Live Search , but thankfully they are there to ensure Google does not have a clear road to do whatever they want .
It was M $ who stopped the Google/Yahoo ad debacle.So , keep it up M $ we need competition .
Good or bad... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so, everyone saying for M$ to give it up, I say keep going.
We need competition and if everyone had the same attitide most have on this post, we would not have any.
I personally never use Live Search, but thankfully they are there to ensure Google does not have a clear road to do whatever they want.
It was M$ who stopped the Google/Yahoo ad debacle.So, keep it up M$ we need competition.
Good or bad....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125993</id>
	<title>I'll squirt you that page I binged for</title>
	<author>a09bdb811a</author>
	<datestamp>1243535040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Chi so ha, bing do wa!"</p><p>Translation: I use Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Chi so ha , bing do wa !
" Translation : I use Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Chi so ha, bing do wa!
"Translation: I use Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126939</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243538100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The background image (including the "hotspots" that link to searches related to the image) is loaded asynchronously after the page (including the search box) is rendered, so the image itself should not slow down a user.</p><p>http://blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2008/07/30/new-home-page-aims-to-help-you-explore-more-on-the-web.aspx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The background image ( including the " hotspots " that link to searches related to the image ) is loaded asynchronously after the page ( including the search box ) is rendered , so the image itself should not slow down a user.http : //blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2008/07/30/new-home-page-aims-to-help-you-explore-more-on-the-web.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The background image (including the "hotspots" that link to searches related to the image) is loaded asynchronously after the page (including the search box) is rendered, so the image itself should not slow down a user.http://blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2008/07/30/new-home-page-aims-to-help-you-explore-more-on-the-web.aspx</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126643</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1243537200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage.</p></div><p>I bet the most searched word on Bing will be "Google", since clueless users search for their search engine, rather than configure correctly their IE browser.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage.I bet the most searched word on Bing will be " Google " , since clueless users search for their search engine , rather than configure correctly their IE browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how many OEMs you bribe to set as the default homepage.I bet the most searched word on Bing will be "Google", since clueless users search for their search engine, rather than configure correctly their IE browser.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127873</id>
	<title>Sopranos?</title>
	<author>highfidelitychris</author>
	<datestamp>1243540860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just like in the Sopranos, you go to the Bing to see naked ladies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like in the Sopranos , you go to the Bing to see naked ladies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like in the Sopranos, you go to the Bing to see naked ladies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131759</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1243512360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's just that (4) isn't clear.</p></div><p>Congrats on figuring out the meme.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just that ( 4 ) is n't clear.Congrats on figuring out the meme .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just that (4) isn't clear.Congrats on figuring out the meme.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126061</id>
	<title>Ah, I see you have the machine that goes ...</title>
	<author>mr\_death</author>
	<datestamp>1243535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Biinnngg!" (with apologies to M. Python).</p><p>Or, Bing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... o! It is certainly true that your search results are a gamble when you use Microsoft search.</p><p>When will Ballmer and company stop throwing billions down this rathole and acknowledge that Google has soundly kicked their ass?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Biinnngg !
" ( with apologies to M. Python ) .Or , Bing ... o ! It is certainly true that your search results are a gamble when you use Microsoft search.When will Ballmer and company stop throwing billions down this rathole and acknowledge that Google has soundly kicked their ass ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Biinnngg!
" (with apologies to M. Python).Or, Bing ... o! It is certainly true that your search results are a gamble when you use Microsoft search.When will Ballmer and company stop throwing billions down this rathole and acknowledge that Google has soundly kicked their ass?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126327</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Groundhog's Day, one of my all time fave movies!</p><p>And remember: "Don't drive angry!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Groundhog 's Day , one of my all time fave movies ! And remember : " Do n't drive angry !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Groundhog's Day, one of my all time fave movies!And remember: "Don't drive angry!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130531</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since the new engine isn't available to the public and most people weren't aware that it was going to be called Kumo, this rebranding is a complete non-story.</p></div><p>Headline says they're rebranding *Live Search* as Bing, not Kumo... so, its still a rebranding (and not a non-issue).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the new engine is n't available to the public and most people were n't aware that it was going to be called Kumo , this rebranding is a complete non-story.Headline says they 're rebranding * Live Search * as Bing , not Kumo... so , its still a rebranding ( and not a non-issue ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the new engine isn't available to the public and most people weren't aware that it was going to be called Kumo, this rebranding is a complete non-story.Headline says they're rebranding *Live Search* as Bing, not Kumo... so, its still a rebranding (and not a non-issue).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129727</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>recursive acronyms are not allowed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>recursive acronyms are not allowed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>recursive acronyms are not allowed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126949</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>theun4gven</author>
	<datestamp>1243538160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The price predictor thing is just <a href="http://www.farecast.com/" title="farecast.com" rel="nofollow">farecast.com</a> [farecast.com]. It's a fairly useful site despite the bloat and slowdown since Microsoft bought it out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The price predictor thing is just farecast.com [ farecast.com ] .
It 's a fairly useful site despite the bloat and slowdown since Microsoft bought it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price predictor thing is just farecast.com [farecast.com].
It's a fairly useful site despite the bloat and slowdown since Microsoft bought it out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133127</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243519260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hum...Let' see..</p><ul>
<li>1 - Make crappy search engine.</li><li>2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine</li><li>3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look</li><li>4 - <b>GOTO step 2</b> </li><li>5 - PROFIT!!</li></ul></div><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hum...Let ' see. . 1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - GOTO step 2 5 - PROFIT !
! There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hum...Let' see..
1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - GOTO step 2 5 - PROFIT!
!There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128161</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1243541580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chandler: From now on, I have no first name.<br>
Joey: So - you're just Bing?<br>
Chandler: I have no name.<br>
Phoebe: All right, so what are we supposed to call you?<br>
Chandler: Okay, for now, temporarily, you can call me... Clint.<br>
Joey: No way are you cool enough to pull off Clint.<br>
Chandler: Okay, so what name am I cool enough to pull off?<br>
Phoebe: Um... Gene.<br>
Chandler: It's Clint. It's Clint.<br>
Joey: See ya later, Gene.<br>
Phoebe: Bye, Gene.<br>
Chandler: It's Clint. Clint.<br>
Joey: What's up with Microsoft?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chandler : From now on , I have no first name .
Joey : So - you 're just Bing ?
Chandler : I have no name .
Phoebe : All right , so what are we supposed to call you ?
Chandler : Okay , for now , temporarily , you can call me... Clint . Joey : No way are you cool enough to pull off Clint .
Chandler : Okay , so what name am I cool enough to pull off ?
Phoebe : Um... Gene . Chandler : It 's Clint .
It 's Clint .
Joey : See ya later , Gene .
Phoebe : Bye , Gene .
Chandler : It 's Clint .
Clint . Joey : What 's up with Microsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chandler: From now on, I have no first name.
Joey: So - you're just Bing?
Chandler: I have no name.
Phoebe: All right, so what are we supposed to call you?
Chandler: Okay, for now, temporarily, you can call me... Clint.
Joey: No way are you cool enough to pull off Clint.
Chandler: Okay, so what name am I cool enough to pull off?
Phoebe: Um... Gene.
Chandler: It's Clint.
It's Clint.
Joey: See ya later, Gene.
Phoebe: Bye, Gene.
Chandler: It's Clint.
Clint.
Joey: What's up with Microsoft?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125933</id>
	<title>BUNG!</title>
	<author>ScooterComputer</author>
	<datestamp>1243534740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this new 'decision engine' wasn't consulted about its own name, otherwise it should be avoided given the quality of its decision-making.</p><p>What a joke. Begin with the proctological comments...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this new 'decision engine ' was n't consulted about its own name , otherwise it should be avoided given the quality of its decision-making.What a joke .
Begin with the proctological comments.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this new 'decision engine' wasn't consulted about its own name, otherwise it should be avoided given the quality of its decision-making.What a joke.
Begin with the proctological comments...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136015</id>
	<title>Re:Some got style, some don't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243589580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the iSeries?</p><p>I'm sure with enough marketing and brand reputation, iFrame could be a perfectly legitimate-sounding name. People are biased towards familiar names.</p><p>If you think about it, a lot of well-known brands have names that sound kind of silly if you think about it. Costco? Burger King?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the iSeries ? I 'm sure with enough marketing and brand reputation , iFrame could be a perfectly legitimate-sounding name .
People are biased towards familiar names.If you think about it , a lot of well-known brands have names that sound kind of silly if you think about it .
Costco ? Burger King ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the iSeries?I'm sure with enough marketing and brand reputation, iFrame could be a perfectly legitimate-sounding name.
People are biased towards familiar names.If you think about it, a lot of well-known brands have names that sound kind of silly if you think about it.
Costco? Burger King?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132123</id>
	<title>Re:Some got style, some don't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243514160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't, but apple fanboys sure would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't , but apple fanboys sure would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't, but apple fanboys sure would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129653</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>TheUser0x58</author>
	<datestamp>1243502940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The difference is that someone (or more likely a team of people) was paid to come up with "Bing".  Not so for the majority of what you've mentioned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is that someone ( or more likely a team of people ) was paid to come up with " Bing " .
Not so for the majority of what you 've mentioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is that someone (or more likely a team of people) was paid to come up with "Bing".
Not so for the majority of what you've mentioned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126177</id>
	<title>Superficial criticism</title>
	<author>Jamamala</author>
	<datestamp>1243535640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good god the introductory video is annoying. 95\% of it consists of an actual video recording a screen and looks horrible: why on earth didn't they use a screen-capturing program? The other 5\% is made up of a woman frowning at said screen to tell the viewer what's bad about all other search engines.<br> <br>The page design is strange; no overt MS branding anywhere. It's almost as if they don't want you to know...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good god the introductory video is annoying .
95 \ % of it consists of an actual video recording a screen and looks horrible : why on earth did n't they use a screen-capturing program ?
The other 5 \ % is made up of a woman frowning at said screen to tell the viewer what 's bad about all other search engines .
The page design is strange ; no overt MS branding anywhere .
It 's almost as if they do n't want you to know.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good god the introductory video is annoying.
95\% of it consists of an actual video recording a screen and looks horrible: why on earth didn't they use a screen-capturing program?
The other 5\% is made up of a woman frowning at said screen to tell the viewer what's bad about all other search engines.
The page design is strange; no overt MS branding anywhere.
It's almost as if they don't want you to know...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130569</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1243506600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kumbing, the new internet pass time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kumbing , the new internet pass time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kumbing, the new internet pass time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I gotta ask. What new technology is behind this "Bing" search?</p><p>I mean, I, like everyone on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./, can think of a thousand pun-related variations off of the word "Bing", but what exactly is a "Decision engine"? It feels like more rebranding of the old stuff, less on the new technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got ta ask .
What new technology is behind this " Bing " search ? I mean , I , like everyone on ./ , can think of a thousand pun-related variations off of the word " Bing " , but what exactly is a " Decision engine " ?
It feels like more rebranding of the old stuff , less on the new technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I gotta ask.
What new technology is behind this "Bing" search?I mean, I, like everyone on ./, can think of a thousand pun-related variations off of the word "Bing", but what exactly is a "Decision engine"?
It feels like more rebranding of the old stuff, less on the new technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>flibuste</author>
	<datestamp>1243535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hum...Let' see..<ul>
<li>1 - Make crappy search engine.</li><li>2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine</li><li>3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look</li><li>4 - ??????</li><li>5 - PROFIT!!</li></ul><p>
It's just that (4) isn't clear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hum...Let ' see. . 1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - ? ? ? ? ?
? 5 - PROFIT ! !
It 's just that ( 4 ) is n't clear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hum...Let' see..
1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - ?????
?5 - PROFIT!!
It's just that (4) isn't clear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28193199</id>
	<title>Bing Is Not Google</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1244023800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amazing nobody has mentioned this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing nobody has mentioned this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing nobody has mentioned this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001</id>
	<title>What's going on</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1243535040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a little confused, but as best I can figure out:</p><p>Microsoft is developing a new search engine that will replace Live Search.  The new engine was going to be called Kumo, but they've decided to call it Bing instead.  It's still in development and not yet available to the public, but eventually it will be online at bing.com.  Presumably, once Bing launches, live.com will redirect there.  The search field on msn.com (which most IE users have set as their home page) will redirect there too.</p><p>Since the new engine isn't available to the public and most people weren't aware that it was going to be called Kumo, this rebranding is a complete non-story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a little confused , but as best I can figure out : Microsoft is developing a new search engine that will replace Live Search .
The new engine was going to be called Kumo , but they 've decided to call it Bing instead .
It 's still in development and not yet available to the public , but eventually it will be online at bing.com .
Presumably , once Bing launches , live.com will redirect there .
The search field on msn.com ( which most IE users have set as their home page ) will redirect there too.Since the new engine is n't available to the public and most people were n't aware that it was going to be called Kumo , this rebranding is a complete non-story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a little confused, but as best I can figure out:Microsoft is developing a new search engine that will replace Live Search.
The new engine was going to be called Kumo, but they've decided to call it Bing instead.
It's still in development and not yet available to the public, but eventually it will be online at bing.com.
Presumably, once Bing launches, live.com will redirect there.
The search field on msn.com (which most IE users have set as their home page) will redirect there too.Since the new engine isn't available to the public and most people weren't aware that it was going to be called Kumo, this rebranding is a complete non-story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789</id>
	<title>Stupid name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the meetings that result in this kind of dumb naming. Someone goes through the trouble of creating really nice presentations, hyping up how he has this new ideas and then forces us to attend at 9am Monday morning. 30mins later the uncreative bastards forced to sit through it all agree how awesome it is but somewhere in their dull brains are going "he is serious with this crap?". It eventually gets marketed to world and nobody buys it, sigh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the meetings that result in this kind of dumb naming .
Someone goes through the trouble of creating really nice presentations , hyping up how he has this new ideas and then forces us to attend at 9am Monday morning .
30mins later the uncreative bastards forced to sit through it all agree how awesome it is but somewhere in their dull brains are going " he is serious with this crap ? " .
It eventually gets marketed to world and nobody buys it , sigh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the meetings that result in this kind of dumb naming.
Someone goes through the trouble of creating really nice presentations, hyping up how he has this new ideas and then forces us to attend at 9am Monday morning.
30mins later the uncreative bastards forced to sit through it all agree how awesome it is but somewhere in their dull brains are going "he is serious with this crap?".
It eventually gets marketed to world and nobody buys it, sigh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126413</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1243536480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails? Bong?</p></div><p>Chandler.</p><p>That guy hasn't had much work recently, he's probably available to promote it too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ? Chandler.That guy has n't had much work recently , he 's probably available to promote it too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong?Chandler.That guy hasn't had much work recently, he's probably available to promote it too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127271</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1243539060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails? Bong?</p></div><p>Well, it does explain what the marketing people were smoking during the brainstorming sessions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ? Well , it does explain what the marketing people were smoking during the brainstorming sessions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong?Well, it does explain what the marketing people were smoking during the brainstorming sessions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136793</id>
	<title>Favicon</title>
	<author>Tronks</author>
	<datestamp>1243600080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The <a href="http://www.bing.com/" title="bing.com" rel="nofollow">web's</a> [bing.com] favicon looks suspiciously similar to <a href="http://www.ebuddy.com/" title="ebuddy.com" rel="nofollow">ebuddy's logo</a> [ebuddy.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The web 's [ bing.com ] favicon looks suspiciously similar to ebuddy 's logo [ ebuddy.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The web's [bing.com] favicon looks suspiciously similar to ebuddy's logo [ebuddy.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126437</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>bigngamer92</author>
	<datestamp>1243536540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just won the Comment Section.
<br> <br>
Not only is it an acronym but it actually makes sense.  Microsoft really wishes that it can somehow win a victory over Google.  They should be able to since they have the greater resources but considering the current situation it seems like they have failed.  Maybe they should emphasize the web services that are working?  Like Sky Drive, or that Microsoft Office Live thing (Has that gone the way of DNF?).  I doubt Wolfram alpha will even make a dent in Google's marketshare although it may at least bury Google Squared.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just won the Comment Section .
Not only is it an acronym but it actually makes sense .
Microsoft really wishes that it can somehow win a victory over Google .
They should be able to since they have the greater resources but considering the current situation it seems like they have failed .
Maybe they should emphasize the web services that are working ?
Like Sky Drive , or that Microsoft Office Live thing ( Has that gone the way of DNF ? ) .
I doubt Wolfram alpha will even make a dent in Google 's marketshare although it may at least bury Google Squared .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just won the Comment Section.
Not only is it an acronym but it actually makes sense.
Microsoft really wishes that it can somehow win a victory over Google.
They should be able to since they have the greater resources but considering the current situation it seems like they have failed.
Maybe they should emphasize the web services that are working?
Like Sky Drive, or that Microsoft Office Live thing (Has that gone the way of DNF?).
I doubt Wolfram alpha will even make a dent in Google's marketshare although it may at least bury Google Squared.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529</id>
	<title>Some got style, some don't</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1243536840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take an decent blouse of mine, it still looks like crap on me. Put it on my gf... oh alright my sister, and she looks absolutely hot in it. As Terry Pratchett once noted in a book, for the truly cool, anything they wear looks good.
</p><p>MS is not cool, it is about as far from cool as you can get with burning yourself. It shouldn't try to be cool. It is like Balmer doing the monkey-dance, it don't fit. He is a boring man and if he tries to be hip, he just end up looking more foolish then he ever could just being boring.
</p><p>MS search. THAT is a PERFECT name for an MS search engine. It says what it does and who it belongs to. JUST as Micrsoft Word, Internet Explorer and such are great names for a boring company.
</p><p>stick with your image, it works far better then going against it. Just ask any politician who tried to rap.
</p><p>Google got away with its name because it was new. MS isn't. Would you buy a IBM mainframe called the iFrame?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take an decent blouse of mine , it still looks like crap on me .
Put it on my gf... oh alright my sister , and she looks absolutely hot in it .
As Terry Pratchett once noted in a book , for the truly cool , anything they wear looks good .
MS is not cool , it is about as far from cool as you can get with burning yourself .
It should n't try to be cool .
It is like Balmer doing the monkey-dance , it do n't fit .
He is a boring man and if he tries to be hip , he just end up looking more foolish then he ever could just being boring .
MS search .
THAT is a PERFECT name for an MS search engine .
It says what it does and who it belongs to .
JUST as Micrsoft Word , Internet Explorer and such are great names for a boring company .
stick with your image , it works far better then going against it .
Just ask any politician who tried to rap .
Google got away with its name because it was new .
MS is n't .
Would you buy a IBM mainframe called the iFrame ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take an decent blouse of mine, it still looks like crap on me.
Put it on my gf... oh alright my sister, and she looks absolutely hot in it.
As Terry Pratchett once noted in a book, for the truly cool, anything they wear looks good.
MS is not cool, it is about as far from cool as you can get with burning yourself.
It shouldn't try to be cool.
It is like Balmer doing the monkey-dance, it don't fit.
He is a boring man and if he tries to be hip, he just end up looking more foolish then he ever could just being boring.
MS search.
THAT is a PERFECT name for an MS search engine.
It says what it does and who it belongs to.
JUST as Micrsoft Word, Internet Explorer and such are great names for a boring company.
stick with your image, it works far better then going against it.
Just ask any politician who tried to rap.
Google got away with its name because it was new.
MS isn't.
Would you buy a IBM mainframe called the iFrame?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126011</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Amazing Quantum Man</author>
	<datestamp>1243535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&lt;VOICE type="Chandler Bing"&gt;<br>Could this branding be any more lame?<br>&lt;/VOICE&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this branding be any more lame ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this branding be any more lame?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</id>
	<title>B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing Is Not Google</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing Is Not Google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing Is Not Google</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</id>
	<title>We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has Monty Python written all over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has Monty Python written all over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has Monty Python written all over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126347</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>jd2112</author>
	<datestamp>1243536240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails? Bong?</p> </div><p>Well, it would be popular with the stoner crowd..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ? Well , it would be popular with the stoner crowd. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong? Well, it would be popular with the stoner crowd..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127281</id>
	<title>Two letters wrong</title>
	<author>Ed Avis</author>
	<datestamp>1243539120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly 'bing' is a mistake - it was intended to be 'billg'.  The original plan was for a little cartoon Bill Gates (think <a href="http://www.marcelgagne.com/images/cwl2004/xbill.jpg" title="marcelgagne.com">xbill</a> [marcelgagne.com]) to pop up and explain answers to you - 640 kilobytes should be enough, and so on.  That would have been cool (and certainly more useful than Wolfram Alpha) but the marketing guys made a mistake somewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly 'bing ' is a mistake - it was intended to be 'billg' .
The original plan was for a little cartoon Bill Gates ( think xbill [ marcelgagne.com ] ) to pop up and explain answers to you - 640 kilobytes should be enough , and so on .
That would have been cool ( and certainly more useful than Wolfram Alpha ) but the marketing guys made a mistake somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly 'bing' is a mistake - it was intended to be 'billg'.
The original plan was for a little cartoon Bill Gates (think xbill [marcelgagne.com]) to pop up and explain answers to you - 640 kilobytes should be enough, and so on.
That would have been cool (and certainly more useful than Wolfram Alpha) but the marketing guys made a mistake somewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125817</id>
	<title>Bing 'cause you need a Bong to use it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Noscript Firefox plugin seems to disable the entire functionality of 'Bing'..<br>Now if someone could please pass me the Bong 'cause I reckon it will help me make faster decisions than this shitty website..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Noscript Firefox plugin seems to disable the entire functionality of 'Bing'..Now if someone could please pass me the Bong 'cause I reckon it will help me make faster decisions than this shitty website. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Noscript Firefox plugin seems to disable the entire functionality of 'Bing'..Now if someone could please pass me the Bong 'cause I reckon it will help me make faster decisions than this shitty website..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130991</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft tries... fails.</p><p>Microsoft tries... fails.</p><p>Microsoft tries... momentum.</p><p>Microsoft tries.. market dominance.</p><p>Say what you will, but we've seen this happen before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft tries... fails.Microsoft tries... fails.Microsoft tries... momentum.Microsoft tries.. market dominance.Say what you will , but we 've seen this happen before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft tries... fails.Microsoft tries... fails.Microsoft tries... momentum.Microsoft tries.. market dominance.Say what you will, but we've seen this happen before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136365</id>
	<title>Re:Hotels in Dublin</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1243594200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The first thing that struck me was the name...So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by...</p></div></blockquote><p>stealing an already used name?</p><p><tt>$ apt-cache show bing<br>Package: bing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>Description: Empirical stochastic bandwidth tester<br>
&nbsp; Bing is a point-to-point bandwidth measurement tool (hence the 'b'),<br>
&nbsp; based on ping.<br>
&nbsp; .<br>
&nbsp; Bing determines the real (raw, as opposed to available or average)<br>
&nbsp; throughput on a link by measuring ICMP echo requests' round trip times<br>
&nbsp; for different packet sizes at each end of the link.<br>Homepage: <a href="http://fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing\_src-readme-1st.shtml" title="fgouget.free.fr">http://fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing\_src-readme-1st.shtml</a> [fgouget.free.fr]<br></tt></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing that struck me was the name...So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by...stealing an already used name ? $ apt-cache show bingPackage : bing ...Description : Empirical stochastic bandwidth tester   Bing is a point-to-point bandwidth measurement tool ( hence the 'b ' ) ,   based on ping .
  .
  Bing determines the real ( raw , as opposed to available or average )   throughput on a link by measuring ICMP echo requests ' round trip times   for different packet sizes at each end of the link.Homepage : http : //fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing \ _src-readme-1st.shtml [ fgouget.free.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing that struck me was the name...So Microsoft innovates the only way they know how by...stealing an already used name?$ apt-cache show bingPackage: bing ...Description: Empirical stochastic bandwidth tester
  Bing is a point-to-point bandwidth measurement tool (hence the 'b'),
  based on ping.
  .
  Bing determines the real (raw, as opposed to available or average)
  throughput on a link by measuring ICMP echo requests' round trip times
  for different packet sizes at each end of the link.Homepage: http://fgouget.free.fr/bing/bing\_src-readme-1st.shtml [fgouget.free.fr]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126729</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198115</id>
	<title>Re:My first thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244053320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ned Ryersonized Search Portal:</p><p>http://msbing.atspace.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ned Ryersonized Search Portal : http : //msbing.atspace.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ned Ryersonized Search Portal:http://msbing.atspace.com/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125735</id>
	<title>Feed me your data.</title>
	<author>DiscountBorg(TM)</author>
	<datestamp>1243534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks Microsoft, but as I value my online privacy, I'll stick with <a href="http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm" title="scroogle.org" rel="nofollow">Scroogle</a> [scroogle.org] instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks Microsoft , but as I value my online privacy , I 'll stick with Scroogle [ scroogle.org ] instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks Microsoft, but as I value my online privacy, I'll stick with Scroogle [scroogle.org] instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126671</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Chazerizer</author>
	<datestamp>1243537260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is going to be designed for people who are actually clueless.  I give you a direct quote from the page on the site.

"While more searchable information is cool, nearly half of all searches don't result in the answer that people are seeking."

I don't know about you, but I only fail to get the information I want if I'm looking for something really esoteric or poorly defined, like what the name of the bar is next door to where Fuddruckers used to be on the North Shore, or the name of the guy who invented the Eton Wall Game.  You can't get that information on the web because it doesn't exist there (and may not exist anywhere).

The problem with most of these comments is who they come from.  Slashdotters (like myself), typically don't have a ton of problems with the internet.  This isn't designed around us.  It's designed for people who really have no idea how the whole thing works.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is going to be designed for people who are actually clueless .
I give you a direct quote from the page on the site .
" While more searchable information is cool , nearly half of all searches do n't result in the answer that people are seeking .
" I do n't know about you , but I only fail to get the information I want if I 'm looking for something really esoteric or poorly defined , like what the name of the bar is next door to where Fuddruckers used to be on the North Shore , or the name of the guy who invented the Eton Wall Game .
You ca n't get that information on the web because it does n't exist there ( and may not exist anywhere ) .
The problem with most of these comments is who they come from .
Slashdotters ( like myself ) , typically do n't have a ton of problems with the internet .
This is n't designed around us .
It 's designed for people who really have no idea how the whole thing works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is going to be designed for people who are actually clueless.
I give you a direct quote from the page on the site.
"While more searchable information is cool, nearly half of all searches don't result in the answer that people are seeking.
"

I don't know about you, but I only fail to get the information I want if I'm looking for something really esoteric or poorly defined, like what the name of the bar is next door to where Fuddruckers used to be on the North Shore, or the name of the guy who invented the Eton Wall Game.
You can't get that information on the web because it doesn't exist there (and may not exist anywhere).
The problem with most of these comments is who they come from.
Slashdotters (like myself), typically don't have a ton of problems with the internet.
This isn't designed around us.
It's designed for people who really have no idea how the whole thing works.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</id>
	<title>cashback?</title>
	<author>Reality Master 201</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the <a href="http://www.decisionengine.com/Letter.html" title="decisionengine.com">Why Bing</a> [decisionengine.com] page:</p><blockquote><div><p>And features like cashback, where we actually give you money back on great products, and<br>Price Predictor, which actually tells you when to buy an airline ticket in order to help get you<br>the best price -- help you make smarter decisions, and put money back in your pocket.</p></div></blockquote><p>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).</p><p>But giving money back on "great products?"  Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick?  Smells faintly like desperation, that does.  I guess we'll see.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the Why Bing [ decisionengine.com ] page : And features like cashback , where we actually give you money back on great products , andPrice Predictor , which actually tells you when to buy an airline ticket in order to help get youthe best price -- help you make smarter decisions , and put money back in your pocket.The price predictor thing sound kinda cool ( though pretty easy to clone ) .But giving money back on " great products ?
" Is that like discounts on MS software , or some other silly gimmick ?
Smells faintly like desperation , that does .
I guess we 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the Why Bing [decisionengine.com] page:And features like cashback, where we actually give you money back on great products, andPrice Predictor, which actually tells you when to buy an airline ticket in order to help get youthe best price -- help you make smarter decisions, and put money back in your pocket.The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).But giving money back on "great products?
"  Is that like discounts on MS software, or some other silly gimmick?
Smells faintly like desperation, that does.
I guess we'll see.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136599</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1243597200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes it is somewhat of a non-story. But then you aren't thinking like Business School Product. By making an Announcement, they get to make an Announcement. This is considered an achievement for Business School Product. Another feature is that if you succeed by a great advertising campaign, that's all well and good for your organization, but what does it do for you, the Bog Standard Business School Product? Not much. If, on the other hand, you can introduce into the mindless waste that is "the buzz" a new Official Buzz Word (voted Most Likely to Make it on Buzz Word Bingo), then you as Business School Product have achieved the highest pinnacle of success. And if your new Buzz Word becomes an Official Buzz Verb, then you will go down in Business School Product as one of the greatest artistes of pop culture. You have finally made the big time, able to get into trendy nightclubs with but a wave of your Jedi marketing hand, "I'm Big Business School Product, don't look behind my curtain".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it is somewhat of a non-story .
But then you are n't thinking like Business School Product .
By making an Announcement , they get to make an Announcement .
This is considered an achievement for Business School Product .
Another feature is that if you succeed by a great advertising campaign , that 's all well and good for your organization , but what does it do for you , the Bog Standard Business School Product ?
Not much .
If , on the other hand , you can introduce into the mindless waste that is " the buzz " a new Official Buzz Word ( voted Most Likely to Make it on Buzz Word Bingo ) , then you as Business School Product have achieved the highest pinnacle of success .
And if your new Buzz Word becomes an Official Buzz Verb , then you will go down in Business School Product as one of the greatest artistes of pop culture .
You have finally made the big time , able to get into trendy nightclubs with but a wave of your Jedi marketing hand , " I 'm Big Business School Product , do n't look behind my curtain " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it is somewhat of a non-story.
But then you aren't thinking like Business School Product.
By making an Announcement, they get to make an Announcement.
This is considered an achievement for Business School Product.
Another feature is that if you succeed by a great advertising campaign, that's all well and good for your organization, but what does it do for you, the Bog Standard Business School Product?
Not much.
If, on the other hand, you can introduce into the mindless waste that is "the buzz" a new Official Buzz Word (voted Most Likely to Make it on Buzz Word Bingo), then you as Business School Product have achieved the highest pinnacle of success.
And if your new Buzz Word becomes an Official Buzz Verb, then you will go down in Business School Product as one of the greatest artistes of pop culture.
You have finally made the big time, able to get into trendy nightclubs with but a wave of your Jedi marketing hand, "I'm Big Business School Product, don't look behind my curtain".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1243537980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Here, let me bing that for you."</p><p>Hmmmm... No.</p></div><p>You joke, but that's probably exactly what they're going for. I'm sure Steve Ballmer "fucking hates" the fact that people use "google" as a verb meaning "to search on the web". His last attempt to create hip new lingo ("squirt") was a dud (even though I've found the product itself to be actually quite good). Now he's trying it again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Here , let me bing that for you. " Hmmmm.. .
No.You joke , but that 's probably exactly what they 're going for .
I 'm sure Steve Ballmer " fucking hates " the fact that people use " google " as a verb meaning " to search on the web " .
His last attempt to create hip new lingo ( " squirt " ) was a dud ( even though I 've found the product itself to be actually quite good ) .
Now he 's trying it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Here, let me bing that for you."Hmmmm...
No.You joke, but that's probably exactly what they're going for.
I'm sure Steve Ballmer "fucking hates" the fact that people use "google" as a verb meaning "to search on the web".
His last attempt to create hip new lingo ("squirt") was a dud (even though I've found the product itself to be actually quite good).
Now he's trying it again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127601</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apache, X, and Thunderbird are perfectly good names.</p><p>And not all recursive-acronym names are bad.  Wine is perfectly good, for example.</p><p>I'll give you Gnome, K*, and Gnu, though.  IceWeasel is rubbish, but it's not the name given by the product's actual developers, so doesn't count.</p><p>And Gimp is undeniably the <b>worst name ever</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apache , X , and Thunderbird are perfectly good names.And not all recursive-acronym names are bad .
Wine is perfectly good , for example.I 'll give you Gnome , K * , and Gnu , though .
IceWeasel is rubbish , but it 's not the name given by the product 's actual developers , so does n't count.And Gimp is undeniably the worst name ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apache, X, and Thunderbird are perfectly good names.And not all recursive-acronym names are bad.
Wine is perfectly good, for example.I'll give you Gnome, K*, and Gnu, though.
IceWeasel is rubbish, but it's not the name given by the product's actual developers, so doesn't count.And Gimp is undeniably the worst name ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127009</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>ClayJar</author>
	<datestamp>1243538340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bad Internet! No Google!</p><p>I'll refrain from making any comments about Bing <em>cherry-picking</em> the Net for results.  I certainly won't claim that Bing is Microsoft <em>crooning</em> over their search engine.  In fact, I don't think I'll even go the onomatopoeic route and say that Bing is the signal to stick a fork in them and see if they're done.  Heck, with the number of things I'm not saying, I may as well not go into wordplay, either, although by analogy with sing/song...</p><p>Bing me a bong I bang when I was young, one we all have bung before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bad Internet !
No Google ! I 'll refrain from making any comments about Bing cherry-picking the Net for results .
I certainly wo n't claim that Bing is Microsoft crooning over their search engine .
In fact , I do n't think I 'll even go the onomatopoeic route and say that Bing is the signal to stick a fork in them and see if they 're done .
Heck , with the number of things I 'm not saying , I may as well not go into wordplay , either , although by analogy with sing/song...Bing me a bong I bang when I was young , one we all have bung before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bad Internet!
No Google!I'll refrain from making any comments about Bing cherry-picking the Net for results.
I certainly won't claim that Bing is Microsoft crooning over their search engine.
In fact, I don't think I'll even go the onomatopoeic route and say that Bing is the signal to stick a fork in them and see if they're done.
Heck, with the number of things I'm not saying, I may as well not go into wordplay, either, although by analogy with sing/song...Bing me a bong I bang when I was young, one we all have bung before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>joe\_cot</author>
	<datestamp>1243536060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Makes sense to me.

Microsoft sees other companies making truckloads full of money (read: mostly VC funding) with their cool Web 2.0 names (Digg, Twitter, ZigZagZoodilyDoo). Microsoft goes where the money is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes sense to me .
Microsoft sees other companies making truckloads full of money ( read : mostly VC funding ) with their cool Web 2.0 names ( Digg , Twitter , ZigZagZoodilyDoo ) .
Microsoft goes where the money is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes sense to me.
Microsoft sees other companies making truckloads full of money (read: mostly VC funding) with their cool Web 2.0 names (Digg, Twitter, ZigZagZoodilyDoo).
Microsoft goes where the money is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28216367</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244117460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, step 5 is simply, "GOTO 3"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , step 5 is simply , " GOTO 3 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, step 5 is simply, "GOTO 3"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129549</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the problem</title>
	<author>Dr.Dubious DDQ</author>
	<datestamp>1243502580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't really surprising.
<p>After all,  We're talking about the company that named its "cloud computing" platform after the color of a cloudless sky...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't really surprising .
After all , We 're talking about the company that named its " cloud computing " platform after the color of a cloudless sky.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't really surprising.
After all,  We're talking about the company that named its "cloud computing" platform after the color of a cloudless sky...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127353</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1243539300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmm, that's <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=ZigZagZoodilyDoo" title="google.com">peculiar</a> [google.com].<p><div class="quote"><p>Your search - ZigZagZoodilyDoo - did not match any documents.
<br>
<br>Suggestions:

</p><ul>
<li>Make sure all words are spelled correctly.</li>
<li>Try different keywords.</li>
<li>Try more general keywords.</li></ul></div><p>Personally, I think ZigZagZoodilyDoo is a heckuva lot better than "Bing!" Better hurry up and register it before Microsoft does!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , that 's peculiar [ google.com ] .Your search - ZigZagZoodilyDoo - did not match any documents .
Suggestions : Make sure all words are spelled correctly .
Try different keywords .
Try more general keywords.Personally , I think ZigZagZoodilyDoo is a heckuva lot better than " Bing !
" Better hurry up and register it before Microsoft does !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, that's peculiar [google.com].Your search - ZigZagZoodilyDoo - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:


Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
Try different keywords.
Try more general keywords.Personally, I think ZigZagZoodilyDoo is a heckuva lot better than "Bing!
" Better hurry up and register it before Microsoft does!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905</id>
	<title>Bing!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ned: Phil? Hey, Phil? Phil! Phil Connors? Phil Connors, I thought that was you!<br>Phil: Hi, how you doing? Thanks for watching.<br>[Starts to walk away]<br>Ned: Hey, hey! Now, don't you tell me you don't remember me because I sure as heckfire remember you.<br>Phil: Not a chance.<br>Ned: Ned... Ryerson. "Needlenose Ned"? "Ned the Head"? C'mon, buddy. Case Western High. Ned Ryerson: I did the whistling belly-button trick at the high school talent show? Bing! Ned Ryerson: got the shingles real bad senior year, almost didn't graduate? Bing, again. Ned Ryerson: I dated your sister Mary Pat a couple times until you told me not to anymore? Well?<br>Phil: Ned Ryerson?<br>Ned: Bing!<br>Phil: Bing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ned : Phil ?
Hey , Phil ?
Phil ! Phil Connors ?
Phil Connors , I thought that was you ! Phil : Hi , how you doing ?
Thanks for watching .
[ Starts to walk away ] Ned : Hey , hey !
Now , do n't you tell me you do n't remember me because I sure as heckfire remember you.Phil : Not a chance.Ned : Ned... Ryerson. " Needlenose Ned " ?
" Ned the Head " ?
C'mon , buddy .
Case Western High .
Ned Ryerson : I did the whistling belly-button trick at the high school talent show ?
Bing ! Ned Ryerson : got the shingles real bad senior year , almost did n't graduate ?
Bing , again .
Ned Ryerson : I dated your sister Mary Pat a couple times until you told me not to anymore ?
Well ? Phil : Ned Ryerson ? Ned : Bing ! Phil : Bing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ned: Phil?
Hey, Phil?
Phil! Phil Connors?
Phil Connors, I thought that was you!Phil: Hi, how you doing?
Thanks for watching.
[Starts to walk away]Ned: Hey, hey!
Now, don't you tell me you don't remember me because I sure as heckfire remember you.Phil: Not a chance.Ned: Ned... Ryerson. "Needlenose Ned"?
"Ned the Head"?
C'mon, buddy.
Case Western High.
Ned Ryerson: I did the whistling belly-button trick at the high school talent show?
Bing! Ned Ryerson: got the shingles real bad senior year, almost didn't graduate?
Bing, again.
Ned Ryerson: I dated your sister Mary Pat a couple times until you told me not to anymore?
Well?Phil: Ned Ryerson?Ned: Bing!Phil: Bing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126625</id>
	<title>Re:Terminology</title>
	<author>mmkkbb</author>
	<datestamp>1243537080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right, of course, but the comparison is off. You cannot meaningfully compare sales of one party with profit of another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , of course , but the comparison is off .
You can not meaningfully compare sales of one party with profit of another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, of course, but the comparison is off.
You cannot meaningfully compare sales of one party with profit of another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127639</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Total page size for Google is 33kb, Bing/Kumo is 111kb.  (Unless you have Google custom home on.  Then google is much larger).  Takes about 150ms longer for me to load Bing/Kumo.  Not really a big deal as long has MS has the servers to back up the extra load.<br>
&nbsp; <br>What it will really come down to is which service gives the results you want more easily.  The time you spend analysing the SERP dwarfs the load time in both cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Total page size for Google is 33kb , Bing/Kumo is 111kb .
( Unless you have Google custom home on .
Then google is much larger ) .
Takes about 150ms longer for me to load Bing/Kumo .
Not really a big deal as long has MS has the servers to back up the extra load .
  What it will really come down to is which service gives the results you want more easily .
The time you spend analysing the SERP dwarfs the load time in both cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Total page size for Google is 33kb, Bing/Kumo is 111kb.
(Unless you have Google custom home on.
Then google is much larger).
Takes about 150ms longer for me to load Bing/Kumo.
Not really a big deal as long has MS has the servers to back up the extra load.
  What it will really come down to is which service gives the results you want more easily.
The time you spend analysing the SERP dwarfs the load time in both cases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132623</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243516740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</p></div><p>Google, you mean?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine , anyway.Google , you mean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.Google, you mean?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127625</id>
	<title>Re:Terminology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me Bing that for you and get back to you with an answer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me Bing that for you and get back to you with an answer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me Bing that for you and get back to you with an answer!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132633</id>
	<title>Re:Long-term pattern</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243516800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They also prevent people from associating the old train-wreck of a product with the shiny new rebadged product.  I'd say it's a net plus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They also prevent people from associating the old train-wreck of a product with the shiny new rebadged product .
I 'd say it 's a net plus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also prevent people from associating the old train-wreck of a product with the shiny new rebadged product.
I'd say it's a net plus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126897</id>
	<title>Re:As in Chandler "Bing"?</title>
	<author>MosX</author>
	<datestamp>1243537980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Opinion != Fact</htmltext>
<tokenext>Opinion ! = Fact</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opinion != Fact</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126319</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126191</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Dystopian Rebel</author>
	<datestamp>1243535760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know someone who works for Redmond's marketing team. If "Bing" fails, the next name will be "Squirt". It will be introduced by an expensive advertising campaign featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld. We'll see the "fun" side of Bill and the unfunny side of Jerry. At the end of each segment, Ballmer will burst through a wall, his face painted purple, screaming "OH YEAH!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know someone who works for Redmond 's marketing team .
If " Bing " fails , the next name will be " Squirt " .
It will be introduced by an expensive advertising campaign featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld .
We 'll see the " fun " side of Bill and the unfunny side of Jerry .
At the end of each segment , Ballmer will burst through a wall , his face painted purple , screaming " OH YEAH !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know someone who works for Redmond's marketing team.
If "Bing" fails, the next name will be "Squirt".
It will be introduced by an expensive advertising campaign featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld.
We'll see the "fun" side of Bill and the unfunny side of Jerry.
At the end of each segment, Ballmer will burst through a wall, his face painted purple, screaming "OH YEAH!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133449</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1243521660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>- Ogg Vorbis</p></div><p>Ogg: Named after a game tactic akin to a single-unit zerg rush<br>
Vorbis: book character<br>
Theora: TV character<br>
Xiph (foundation developing ogg): a fish</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- Apache</p></div><p>Indians, by military helicopters are cooler.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- IceWeasel</p></div><p>Pun on 'Firefox'</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- Thunderbird</p></div><p>Vaguely similar in theme to Firefox, also the name of a car</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- X</p></div><p>It's Unix predecessor was 'W', I believe.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with K</p></div><p>Why not?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- Ogg VorbisOgg : Named after a game tactic akin to a single-unit zerg rush Vorbis : book character Theora : TV character Xiph ( foundation developing ogg ) : a fish- ApacheIndians , by military helicopters are cooler.- IceWeaselPun on 'Firefox'- ThunderbirdVaguely similar in theme to Firefox , also the name of a car- XIt 's Unix predecessor was 'W ' , I believe.- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with KWhy not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Ogg VorbisOgg: Named after a game tactic akin to a single-unit zerg rush
Vorbis: book character
Theora: TV character
Xiph (foundation developing ogg): a fish- ApacheIndians, by military helicopters are cooler.- IceWeaselPun on 'Firefox'- ThunderbirdVaguely similar in theme to Firefox, also the name of a car- XIt's Unix predecessor was 'W', I believe.- Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with KWhy not?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127153</id>
	<title>Re:Terminology</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243538760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's the important question, and none of the press releases linked here have an answer.</i></p><p>Try <i>bing</i>ing it...</p><p>sorry,</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the important question , and none of the press releases linked here have an answer.Try binging it...sorry ,         -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the important question, and none of the press releases linked here have an answer.Try binging it...sorry,
        -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128019</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>tabdelgawad</author>
	<datestamp>1243541220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a ridiculous position!  Everybody on Slashdot who's not a Google employee should be rooting for Microsoft to succeed.  Competition is good, people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a ridiculous position !
Everybody on Slashdot who 's not a Google employee should be rooting for Microsoft to succeed .
Competition is good , people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a ridiculous position!
Everybody on Slashdot who's not a Google employee should be rooting for Microsoft to succeed.
Competition is good, people!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130537</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243506480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next, they could go after the Cherry growers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next , they could go after the Cherry growers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next, they could go after the Cherry growers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130877</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid name</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1243508100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No kidding. Microsoft is so good at making effective marketing presentations, they must have been suckered in by their own bull sh|t. Haha.</p><p>LoB</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding .
Microsoft is so good at making effective marketing presentations , they must have been suckered in by their own bull sh | t .
Haha.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding.
Microsoft is so good at making effective marketing presentations, they must have been suckered in by their own bull sh|t.
Haha.LoB</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128291</id>
	<title>But is proprietary software any better?</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1243541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But is proprietary software any better at coming up with names?<p><div class="quote"><p>Ogg Vorbis</p></div><p>MPEG layer 3</p><p><div class="quote"><p>IceWeasel</p></div><p>Opera</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Thunderbird</p></div><p>LookOut, I mean Outlook</p><p><div class="quote"><p>X</p></div><p>DirectX</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Prefacing thousands of KDE apps with K</p></div><p>Win prefix</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But is proprietary software any better at coming up with names ? Ogg VorbisMPEG layer 3IceWeaselOperaThunderbirdLookOut , I mean OutlookXDirectXPrefacing thousands of KDE apps with KWin prefix</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But is proprietary software any better at coming up with names?Ogg VorbisMPEG layer 3IceWeaselOperaThunderbirdLookOut, I mean OutlookXDirectXPrefacing thousands of KDE apps with KWin prefix
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28137159</id>
	<title>I'm immature...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243603560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The video froze on me for some reason near the beginning, leaving me with the image of someone searching for "world's largest rod"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The video froze on me for some reason near the beginning , leaving me with the image of someone searching for " world 's largest rod " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video froze on me for some reason near the beginning, leaving me with the image of someone searching for "world's largest rod"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130863</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Arterion</author>
	<datestamp>1243508100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely beautiful!</p><p>Some people spew a lot of vitriol at AC's in general, and then one posts a beautiful gem like this.</p><p>Likely just because they don't want to harm their karma with the way Funny mods work.  +5 Funny and +2 Overrated-MS-Fanboi is a bing on your karma.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely beautiful ! Some people spew a lot of vitriol at AC 's in general , and then one posts a beautiful gem like this.Likely just because they do n't want to harm their karma with the way Funny mods work .
+ 5 Funny and + 2 Overrated-MS-Fanboi is a bing on your karma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely beautiful!Some people spew a lot of vitriol at AC's in general, and then one posts a beautiful gem like this.Likely just because they don't want to harm their karma with the way Funny mods work.
+5 Funny and +2 Overrated-MS-Fanboi is a bing on your karma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135809</id>
	<title>Re:I think they might have someone</title>
	<author>bigblackcar</author>
	<datestamp>1243630200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bing? Like Chandler Bing?

Another unlucky comedian connection for MS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing ?
Like Chandler Bing ?
Another unlucky comedian connection for MS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing?
Like Chandler Bing?
Another unlucky comedian connection for MS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134141</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243526640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they would like into the 'hip' crowd, maybe they could call it "Coolgle"?<br> <br>I think the Fonz would approve.  Heyyyy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they would like into the 'hip ' crowd , maybe they could call it " Coolgle " ?
I think the Fonz would approve .
Heyyyy : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they would like into the 'hip' crowd, maybe they could call it "Coolgle"?
I think the Fonz would approve.
Heyyyy :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135451</id>
	<title>Never name things without research</title>
	<author>coffeechica</author>
	<datestamp>1243539840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dubious product qualities aside, 1.3 billion Chinese won't want to touch it. "Bing" (pronounced like non-Chinese people are likely to) means "illness" or "plague". It's a really common word.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dubious product qualities aside , 1.3 billion Chinese wo n't want to touch it .
" Bing " ( pronounced like non-Chinese people are likely to ) means " illness " or " plague " .
It 's a really common word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dubious product qualities aside, 1.3 billion Chinese won't want to touch it.
"Bing" (pronounced like non-Chinese people are likely to) means "illness" or "plague".
It's a really common word.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128679</id>
	<title>I am dubious at best</title>
	<author>tim1602</author>
	<datestamp>1243542900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions"

Well as long as we can have the Government and Microsoft helping us make "important decisions" we should be fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions " Well as long as we can have the Government and Microsoft helping us make " important decisions " we should be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It also adds unique tools to help the user make important decisions"

Well as long as we can have the Government and Microsoft helping us make "important decisions" we should be fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683</id>
	<title>organized results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results.</p></div><p>Organized Results as in "higher rating the more you pay us"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster , more informed decisions ' by combining a 'great search engine ' with organized results.Organized Results as in " higher rating the more you pay us " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results.Organized Results as in "higher rating the more you pay us"?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127329</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1243539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132379</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1243515480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh, I don't have to look, because somewhere 20 pages deep it states that this is US or US + Canada (and maybe the 51st state) only. The other few billion people are of course freshly out of luck.</p><p>Or am I guessing wrong this time around? I would be utterly amazed if I was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh , I do n't have to look , because somewhere 20 pages deep it states that this is US or US + Canada ( and maybe the 51st state ) only .
The other few billion people are of course freshly out of luck.Or am I guessing wrong this time around ?
I would be utterly amazed if I was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh, I don't have to look, because somewhere 20 pages deep it states that this is US or US + Canada (and maybe the 51st state) only.
The other few billion people are of course freshly out of luck.Or am I guessing wrong this time around?
I would be utterly amazed if I was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129415</id>
	<title>Bring me a shrubbery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243502160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or I'll say Bing!<br>Bing!<br>Bing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or I 'll say Bing ! Bing ! Bing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or I'll say Bing!Bing!Bing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125947</id>
	<title>BING Is Not Google</title>
	<author>A12m0v</author>
	<datestamp>1243534800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BING Is Not Google</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BING Is Not Google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BING Is Not Google</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126507</id>
	<title>Re:I think they might have someone</title>
	<author>UltraAyla</author>
	<datestamp>1243536780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really do think that this summary was pretty unfair to it. This really doesn't seem to be a rebranding, but actually a pretty solid rewrite of the features. I read a WIRED article on it earlier today and it sounded interesting - a little like the offspring of Wolfram|Alpha and Google. See <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/microsofts-bing-hides-its-best-features/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/microsofts-bing-hides-its-best-features/</a> [wired.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do think that this summary was pretty unfair to it .
This really does n't seem to be a rebranding , but actually a pretty solid rewrite of the features .
I read a WIRED article on it earlier today and it sounded interesting - a little like the offspring of Wolfram | Alpha and Google .
See http : //www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/microsofts-bing-hides-its-best-features/ [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really do think that this summary was pretty unfair to it.
This really doesn't seem to be a rebranding, but actually a pretty solid rewrite of the features.
I read a WIRED article on it earlier today and it sounded interesting - a little like the offspring of Wolfram|Alpha and Google.
See http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/microsofts-bing-hides-its-best-features/ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126313</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717</id>
	<title>Here's the problem</title>
	<author>rob1980</author>
	<datestamp>1243534020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results.</i> <br> <br>
They change the search engine's name in an effort to draw a crowd, then they fuck it up by weighing it down with language that's awful damn close to the infinitely-scalable enterprise class web 2.0 productivity enhancement solution corporatespeak that makes people roll their eyes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster , more informed decisions ' by combining a 'great search engine ' with organized results .
They change the search engine 's name in an effort to draw a crowd , then they fuck it up by weighing it down with language that 's awful damn close to the infinitely-scalable enterprise class web 2.0 productivity enhancement solution corporatespeak that makes people roll their eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing goes 'beyond the traditional search engines to help you make faster, more informed decisions' by combining a 'great search engine' with organized results.
They change the search engine's name in an effort to draw a crowd, then they fuck it up by weighing it down with language that's awful damn close to the infinitely-scalable enterprise class web 2.0 productivity enhancement solution corporatespeak that makes people roll their eyes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125841</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?  Bong?</p></div><p>Nah, I think it's going to be "Bang" so that sentences like this happen: <br> <br>

"I couldn't find the answer in my textbook so I Banged it."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the new branding going to be after this one fails ?
Bong ? Nah , I think it 's going to be " Bang " so that sentences like this happen : " I could n't find the answer in my textbook so I Banged it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the new branding going to be after this one fails?
Bong?Nah, I think it's going to be "Bang" so that sentences like this happen:  

"I couldn't find the answer in my textbook so I Banged it.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129895</id>
	<title>Re:B.I.N.G.?</title>
	<author>jbacon</author>
	<datestamp>1243504080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/thread</p><p>That's it folks, game over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/threadThat 's it folks , game over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/threadThat's it folks, game over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128597</id>
	<title>Shoulda called it the Soprano</title>
	<author>axl917</author>
	<datestamp>1243542660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bada Bing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bada Bing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bada Bing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126337</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243536240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines. Its not profitable, labels you as a "Google clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle, you won't end up capturing any marketshare.</p></div><p>This same attitude showed up in the Zune HD story. I find it an idiotic viewpoint. Because one company has done something really well, nobody else should try? Do you seriously want people to stop trying to compete and trying to one-up other companies, just because the existing product or service seems to be all you could ever want?</p><p>You want things to stagnate?</p><p>Granted, we know MS will fail. But suggesting that they shouldn't try seems positively idiotic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS should seriously just stop trying to " improve " search engines .
Its not profitable , labels you as a " Google clone " , and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle , you wo n't end up capturing any marketshare.This same attitude showed up in the Zune HD story .
I find it an idiotic viewpoint .
Because one company has done something really well , nobody else should try ?
Do you seriously want people to stop trying to compete and trying to one-up other companies , just because the existing product or service seems to be all you could ever want ? You want things to stagnate ? Granted , we know MS will fail .
But suggesting that they should n't try seems positively idiotic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS should seriously just stop trying to "improve" search engines.
Its not profitable, labels you as a "Google clone", and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google and iGoogle, you won't end up capturing any marketshare.This same attitude showed up in the Zune HD story.
I find it an idiotic viewpoint.
Because one company has done something really well, nobody else should try?
Do you seriously want people to stop trying to compete and trying to one-up other companies, just because the existing product or service seems to be all you could ever want?You want things to stagnate?Granted, we know MS will fail.
But suggesting that they shouldn't try seems positively idiotic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127033</id>
	<title>Kayak.com Copied</title>
	<author>Game\_Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1243538400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There flight search is a direct rip off of <a href="http://www.kayak.com/" title="kayak.com" rel="nofollow">kayak.com</a> [kayak.com].  Its so blatant that I have to assume they are licensing the tech from that site directly.  If not its just another use of Redmond's photocopiers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There flight search is a direct rip off of kayak.com [ kayak.com ] .
Its so blatant that I have to assume they are licensing the tech from that site directly .
If not its just another use of Redmond 's photocopiers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There flight search is a direct rip off of kayak.com [kayak.com].
Its so blatant that I have to assume they are licensing the tech from that site directly.
If not its just another use of Redmond's photocopiers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125957</id>
	<title>Chameleon is a much better name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like one search thing like http://www.elookinto.com. Don't know if it will include the 'Chameleon' as a choice</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like one search thing like http : //www.elookinto.com .
Do n't know if it will include the 'Chameleon ' as a choice</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like one search thing like http://www.elookinto.com.
Don't know if it will include the 'Chameleon' as a choice</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127239</id>
	<title>What ever you do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont search google for: "Bing sucks"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont search google for : " Bing sucks "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont search google for: "Bing sucks"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126299</id>
	<title>Re:Terminology</title>
	<author>diegocgteleline.es</author>
	<datestamp>1243536120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, Google has profits. Microsoft's online division, in the other hand, has been losing money for \_years\_. They don't make many money with the xbox division either. Windows, Office and server tools - those are the wash cows from where all their money comes from</p><p>The only way microsoft has succeeded in xbox and MSN/live is by using money from their cash cows to cover the loses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , Google has profits .
Microsoft 's online division , in the other hand , has been losing money for \ _years \ _ .
They do n't make many money with the xbox division either .
Windows , Office and server tools - those are the wash cows from where all their money comes fromThe only way microsoft has succeeded in xbox and MSN/live is by using money from their cash cows to cover the loses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, Google has profits.
Microsoft's online division, in the other hand, has been losing money for \_years\_.
They don't make many money with the xbox division either.
Windows, Office and server tools - those are the wash cows from where all their money comes fromThe only way microsoft has succeeded in xbox and MSN/live is by using money from their cash cows to cover the loses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126103</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1243535400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's much more trivial than that.</p><p>"Live Search" was a sucky name, because you can't make a decent verb out of it. You google stuff, but you don't "lively search" it, or whatever. But you can bing it for sure...</p><p>Then, of course, the fact that Bing Is Not Google is hardly a coincidence, either.</p><p>Still, I'm not particularly fond of the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's much more trivial than that .
" Live Search " was a sucky name , because you ca n't make a decent verb out of it .
You google stuff , but you do n't " lively search " it , or whatever .
But you can bing it for sure...Then , of course , the fact that Bing Is Not Google is hardly a coincidence , either.Still , I 'm not particularly fond of the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's much more trivial than that.
"Live Search" was a sucky name, because you can't make a decent verb out of it.
You google stuff, but you don't "lively search" it, or whatever.
But you can bing it for sure...Then, of course, the fact that Bing Is Not Google is hardly a coincidence, either.Still, I'm not particularly fond of the name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126091</id>
	<title>Chameleon should be the name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know if something http://elookinto.com will include 'Bing', the chameleon. Maybe not since it is not a 'search engine'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know if something http : //elookinto.com will include 'Bing ' , the chameleon .
Maybe not since it is not a 'search engine' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know if something http://elookinto.com will include 'Bing', the chameleon.
Maybe not since it is not a 'search engine'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130103</id>
	<title>Re:Long-term pattern</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1243504920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>throw out years' worth of marketing effort</p></div><p>"Zune".  Any other questions?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>throw out years ' worth of marketing effort " Zune " .
Any other questions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>throw out years' worth of marketing effort"Zune".
Any other questions?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132153</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>SilverHatHacker</author>
	<datestamp>1243514460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>-iWork <br>
-iTunes <br>
-iMovie <br>
-iPod <br>
-iPhone <br>
-iMac <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...is Apple any better? I sometimes flinch when I talk about Oggs or the GIMP, but Apple's names sound pretty cheesy too. I think any name for software is going to strike the wrong nerve with someone, because everyone has their own personal tastes. Even the GNOME apps with names like 'Web Browser', and 'Text Editor' (not their real names, but what the environment - and by extension, the user - refers to them as) are boring and ordinary. Your name can be the stupidest thing in the world, but at least people will remember it, which is all that counts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>-iWork -iTunes -iMovie -iPod -iPhone -iMac ...is Apple any better ?
I sometimes flinch when I talk about Oggs or the GIMP , but Apple 's names sound pretty cheesy too .
I think any name for software is going to strike the wrong nerve with someone , because everyone has their own personal tastes .
Even the GNOME apps with names like 'Web Browser ' , and 'Text Editor ' ( not their real names , but what the environment - and by extension , the user - refers to them as ) are boring and ordinary .
Your name can be the stupidest thing in the world , but at least people will remember it , which is all that counts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-iWork 
-iTunes 
-iMovie 
-iPod 
-iPhone 
-iMac  ...is Apple any better?
I sometimes flinch when I talk about Oggs or the GIMP, but Apple's names sound pretty cheesy too.
I think any name for software is going to strike the wrong nerve with someone, because everyone has their own personal tastes.
Even the GNOME apps with names like 'Web Browser', and 'Text Editor' (not their real names, but what the environment - and by extension, the user - refers to them as) are boring and ordinary.
Your name can be the stupidest thing in the world, but at least people will remember it, which is all that counts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135947</id>
	<title>Not so good in Scotland either ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243588740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... where a bing is one of those large heaps of unwanted stuff that is dug out of a coal mine - a slagheap in other words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... where a bing is one of those large heaps of unwanted stuff that is dug out of a coal mine - a slagheap in other words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... where a bing is one of those large heaps of unwanted stuff that is dug out of a coal mine - a slagheap in other words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125721</id>
	<title>Would you wear this?</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1243534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was "bling" but the cool factor was lost on me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was " bling " but the cool factor was lost on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was "bling" but the cool factor was lost on me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129857</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>whistlingtony</author>
	<datestamp>1243503840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen!</p><p>The no nonsense google home page is what lured me there in the first place. I was still using a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... modem.... at the time. Not loading crappy pictures was a feature to me, and still is. Go Google!</p><p>That, and I don't want to see ads. When I'm shopping, I do want to see them, and lo, there they are. The rest of the time they should get the hell out of my way.</p><p>-T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen ! The no nonsense google home page is what lured me there in the first place .
I was still using a ... modem.... at the time .
Not loading crappy pictures was a feature to me , and still is .
Go Google ! That , and I do n't want to see ads .
When I 'm shopping , I do want to see them , and lo , there they are .
The rest of the time they should get the hell out of my way.-T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen!The no nonsense google home page is what lured me there in the first place.
I was still using a ... modem.... at the time.
Not loading crappy pictures was a feature to me, and still is.
Go Google!That, and I don't want to see ads.
When I'm shopping, I do want to see them, and lo, there they are.
The rest of the time they should get the hell out of my way.-T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130127</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, this isn't a scam, it actually works. All they ask you to do is search for and go to the product website/page through live.com. Many large websites participate (ebay, newegg etc). A percentage of what you spend is then given back to you in 60 days. Percentages range from 1\% to 25\% depending on the website.</p><p>I really don't see the point in it though. I go through live.com, buy the product and go back to Google to do my searches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this is n't a scam , it actually works .
All they ask you to do is search for and go to the product website/page through live.com .
Many large websites participate ( ebay , newegg etc ) .
A percentage of what you spend is then given back to you in 60 days .
Percentages range from 1 \ % to 25 \ % depending on the website.I really do n't see the point in it though .
I go through live.com , buy the product and go back to Google to do my searches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this isn't a scam, it actually works.
All they ask you to do is search for and go to the product website/page through live.com.
Many large websites participate (ebay, newegg etc).
A percentage of what you spend is then given back to you in 60 days.
Percentages range from 1\% to 25\% depending on the website.I really don't see the point in it though.
I go through live.com, buy the product and go back to Google to do my searches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126227</id>
	<title>Shakespeare</title>
	<author>PeeShootr</author>
	<datestamp>1243535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"A turd by any other name still stinks really badly"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" A turd by any other name still stinks really badly "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A turd by any other name still stinks really badly"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127231</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, they're going to need a name that sounds professional if they want to take on Google.</p><p>Wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they 're going to need a name that sounds professional if they want to take on Google.Wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they're going to need a name that sounds professional if they want to take on Google.Wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731</id>
	<title>My first thought...</title>
	<author>jav1231</author>
	<datestamp>1243534080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ned: "Guess who!" <br>
Phil: "Ned? Ned Ryerson?"<br>
Ned: "BING!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ned : " Guess who !
" Phil : " Ned ?
Ned Ryerson ?
" Ned : " BING !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ned: "Guess who!
" 
Phil: "Ned?
Ned Ryerson?
"
Ned: "BING!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837</id>
	<title>As in Chandler "Bing"?</title>
	<author>freedom\_india</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...those who used to watch FRIENDS every Thursday night will get this joke. Others, you don't what fund you missed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...those who used to watch FRIENDS every Thursday night will get this joke .
Others , you do n't what fund you missed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...those who used to watch FRIENDS every Thursday night will get this joke.
Others, you don't what fund you missed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127073</id>
	<title>Re:They're asking to be sued over that moniker</title>
	<author>Phurd Phlegm</author>
	<datestamp>1243538520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's [Bing is] an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Not meaningful like "Google" or "Yahoo?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's [ Bing is ] an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine , anyway .
Not meaningful like " Google " or " Yahoo ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's [Bing is] an utterly stupid and non-descriptive name for a search engine, anyway.
Not meaningful like "Google" or "Yahoo?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125823</id>
	<title>Marketing BINGe?</title>
	<author>Celeste R</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been said that good marketers sell products, products don't sell themselves...  but I think this is an exception to that rule.

A product has to be able to sell itself to the minds of people taking a second look at something new.  To me, name like "Bing" is...  well, we'll say that it's about as inspired as a rock in a cave.  Yes, there was Bing Crosby, but I always knew him as Crosby, Bing was hardly in my vocabulary.

What I use and show others reflects on me and my businesses.  I'm not going to print off a page off that engine, just so that I can get snarky comments about me trying to bring back the old shows.  I'll stick with Google, TYVM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been said that good marketers sell products , products do n't sell themselves... but I think this is an exception to that rule .
A product has to be able to sell itself to the minds of people taking a second look at something new .
To me , name like " Bing " is... well , we 'll say that it 's about as inspired as a rock in a cave .
Yes , there was Bing Crosby , but I always knew him as Crosby , Bing was hardly in my vocabulary .
What I use and show others reflects on me and my businesses .
I 'm not going to print off a page off that engine , just so that I can get snarky comments about me trying to bring back the old shows .
I 'll stick with Google , TYVM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been said that good marketers sell products, products don't sell themselves...  but I think this is an exception to that rule.
A product has to be able to sell itself to the minds of people taking a second look at something new.
To me, name like "Bing" is...  well, we'll say that it's about as inspired as a rock in a cave.
Yes, there was Bing Crosby, but I always knew him as Crosby, Bing was hardly in my vocabulary.
What I use and show others reflects on me and my businesses.
I'm not going to print off a page off that engine, just so that I can get snarky comments about me trying to bring back the old shows.
I'll stick with Google, TYVM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126883</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>arminw</author>
	<datestamp>1243537920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Here, let me bing that for you...</p><p>Here, let me eat those bing cherries for you. Microsoft has a real cherry here!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Here , let me bing that for you...Here , let me eat those bing cherries for you .
Microsoft has a real cherry here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Here, let me bing that for you...Here, let me eat those bing cherries for you.
Microsoft has a real cherry here!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755</id>
	<title>I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>DavidR1991</author>
	<datestamp>1243534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because the video shows a big image/background at the top. That's great, but part of the other reason Google is the leader (other than the results it produces) is the fact the page is a no-nonsense zone - sure, you've got the Google logo, but other than that, the page consists nearly entirely of blank space, or text/links. No stupid pointless pictures, no needless button images. It's fast, and it works. Once 'Bing' gets up to capacity though, I reckon it'll be dog slow, because it has useless decor. The search engine isn't the destination: So why the pointless crap?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because the video shows a big image/background at the top .
That 's great , but part of the other reason Google is the leader ( other than the results it produces ) is the fact the page is a no-nonsense zone - sure , you 've got the Google logo , but other than that , the page consists nearly entirely of blank space , or text/links .
No stupid pointless pictures , no needless button images .
It 's fast , and it works .
Once 'Bing ' gets up to capacity though , I reckon it 'll be dog slow , because it has useless decor .
The search engine is n't the destination : So why the pointless crap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because the video shows a big image/background at the top.
That's great, but part of the other reason Google is the leader (other than the results it produces) is the fact the page is a no-nonsense zone - sure, you've got the Google logo, but other than that, the page consists nearly entirely of blank space, or text/links.
No stupid pointless pictures, no needless button images.
It's fast, and it works.
Once 'Bing' gets up to capacity though, I reckon it'll be dog slow, because it has useless decor.
The search engine isn't the destination: So why the pointless crap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127015</id>
	<title>Fire your marketing staff</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1243538340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing, Live, MSN, Kumo... what the hell is the difference?</p><p>How about you fire your marketing department and use names people can understand, like:<br>Microsoft Web Search<br>Microsoft Webmail<br>Microsoft Product Search<br>Microsoft News Portal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...etc</p><p>Would save money and leave the users a lot less confused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing , Live , MSN , Kumo... what the hell is the difference ? How about you fire your marketing department and use names people can understand , like : Microsoft Web SearchMicrosoft WebmailMicrosoft Product SearchMicrosoft News Portal ...etcWould save money and leave the users a lot less confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing, Live, MSN, Kumo... what the hell is the difference?How about you fire your marketing department and use names people can understand, like:Microsoft Web SearchMicrosoft WebmailMicrosoft Product SearchMicrosoft News Portal ...etcWould save money and leave the users a lot less confused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126319</id>
	<title>Re:As in Chandler "Bing"?</title>
	<author>swordgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah yes. The most resolutely mediocre and unentertaining show on television.</p><p>There are shows that were less funny by means of offense or tasteless, but I don't know if anything has managed to surpass it in terms of utterly bland, unfunny gags propped up by excessive laugh track use.</p><p>Hated that show with a passion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah yes .
The most resolutely mediocre and unentertaining show on television.There are shows that were less funny by means of offense or tasteless , but I do n't know if anything has managed to surpass it in terms of utterly bland , unfunny gags propped up by excessive laugh track use.Hated that show with a passion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah yes.
The most resolutely mediocre and unentertaining show on television.There are shows that were less funny by means of offense or tasteless, but I don't know if anything has managed to surpass it in terms of utterly bland, unfunny gags propped up by excessive laugh track use.Hated that show with a passion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126233</id>
	<title>GooglePLEX(tm)</title>
	<author>relguj9</author>
	<datestamp>1243535880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>trademark pending</htmltext>
<tokenext>trademark pending</tokentext>
<sentencetext>trademark pending</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125847</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>MeanMF</author>
	<datestamp>1243534380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you just disrespect the Bing?  I would keep an eye out for Tony Soprano if I were you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you just disrespect the Bing ?
I would keep an eye out for Tony Soprano if I were you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you just disrespect the Bing?
I would keep an eye out for Tony Soprano if I were you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127163</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243538820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let them try to compete if they want. There's only upside (at least, for those of us who don't work for Google -- and, maybe even for those that do).</p><p>I mean, seriously, I see this type of statement all the time about MSFT's search efforts: give up, give up, give up.</p><p>Presumably, the authors of these opinions hate Microsoft because they monopolized a market and that lead to things it always does for consumers: slower innovation, higher prices, customer indifference, arrogance, etc.</p><p>The irony, and my point, is that the argument being put forth ("give up, submit to Google's dominance) will lead to exactly the environment that lead to the hate that lead them to write the argument.</p><p>It's bizarre. Even if you believe Google will never "do evil", at the very least, let Microsoft keep trying so that you can make fun of them, so that they have fewer resources to dominate other areas, etc.  As Napoleon said, "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let them try to compete if they want .
There 's only upside ( at least , for those of us who do n't work for Google -- and , maybe even for those that do ) .I mean , seriously , I see this type of statement all the time about MSFT 's search efforts : give up , give up , give up.Presumably , the authors of these opinions hate Microsoft because they monopolized a market and that lead to things it always does for consumers : slower innovation , higher prices , customer indifference , arrogance , etc.The irony , and my point , is that the argument being put forth ( " give up , submit to Google 's dominance ) will lead to exactly the environment that lead to the hate that lead them to write the argument.It 's bizarre .
Even if you believe Google will never " do evil " , at the very least , let Microsoft keep trying so that you can make fun of them , so that they have fewer resources to dominate other areas , etc .
As Napoleon said , " Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let them try to compete if they want.
There's only upside (at least, for those of us who don't work for Google -- and, maybe even for those that do).I mean, seriously, I see this type of statement all the time about MSFT's search efforts: give up, give up, give up.Presumably, the authors of these opinions hate Microsoft because they monopolized a market and that lead to things it always does for consumers: slower innovation, higher prices, customer indifference, arrogance, etc.The irony, and my point, is that the argument being put forth ("give up, submit to Google's dominance) will lead to exactly the environment that lead to the hate that lead them to write the argument.It's bizarre.
Even if you believe Google will never "do evil", at the very least, let Microsoft keep trying so that you can make fun of them, so that they have fewer resources to dominate other areas, etc.
As Napoleon said, "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126811</id>
	<title>Doesn't work for me</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1243537740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I clicked on the link, and then on the "Why Bing" button.  Nothing.  Is it because I'm using Firefox?  I can't find any way to actually search on the bing homepage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I clicked on the link , and then on the " Why Bing " button .
Nothing. Is it because I 'm using Firefox ?
I ca n't find any way to actually search on the bing homepage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I clicked on the link, and then on the "Why Bing" button.
Nothing.  Is it because I'm using Firefox?
I can't find any way to actually search on the bing homepage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126893</id>
	<title>Ned Ryerson's search engine?</title>
	<author>LeedsSideStreets</author>
	<datestamp>1243537980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's impossible for me to think of anything other than <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0YLD\_9lRGU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Groundhog Day</a> [youtube.com] upon hearing this name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's impossible for me to think of anything other than Groundhog Day [ youtube.com ] upon hearing this name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's impossible for me to think of anything other than Groundhog Day [youtube.com] upon hearing this name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130045</id>
	<title>Apologies to John Sladek</title>
	<author>Orgasmatron</author>
	<datestamp>1243504680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Tik-Tok, like you to meet Neeta Hup, the President's Special Advisor on<br>Communications; what was it?"<br>She laughed. "Special Advisor on Leisure Communications, Media<br>Aesthetics and Bong."<br>"Bong?" I asked, as Hornby drifted away again.<br>"I felt the word \_Art\_ didn't belong on the end of a string of syllables<br>like that, so I changed it to \_Bong\_," she said. "The President was furious,<br>but so far no one else official has noticed. Maybe I'll try introducing bong<br>into the language. People are tired of art, give them bong."<br>"For bong's sake," I murmured. "\_How\_ do you advise?"<br>"I buy, I make acquisitions for the President's collection. He wants to<br>be the biggest bong collector since Goering. He's heard what a good investment<br>it is, isn't that pathetic?"<br>"Oh, I don't know. Money is real, money endures. All the noblest<br>sentiments can be beautifully expressed in money. If everyone showered artists<br>with money whenever they saw them, wouldn't this be a finer world?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Tik-Tok , like you to meet Neeta Hup , the President 's Special Advisor onCommunications ; what was it ?
" She laughed .
" Special Advisor on Leisure Communications , MediaAesthetics and Bong. " " Bong ?
" I asked , as Hornby drifted away again .
" I felt the word \ _Art \ _ did n't belong on the end of a string of syllableslike that , so I changed it to \ _Bong \ _ , " she said .
" The President was furious,but so far no one else official has noticed .
Maybe I 'll try introducing bonginto the language .
People are tired of art , give them bong .
" " For bong 's sake , " I murmured .
" \ _How \ _ do you advise ?
" " I buy , I make acquisitions for the President 's collection .
He wants tobe the biggest bong collector since Goering .
He 's heard what a good investmentit is , is n't that pathetic ?
" " Oh , I do n't know .
Money is real , money endures .
All the noblestsentiments can be beautifully expressed in money .
If everyone showered artistswith money whenever they saw them , would n't this be a finer world ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Tik-Tok, like you to meet Neeta Hup, the President's Special Advisor onCommunications; what was it?
"She laughed.
"Special Advisor on Leisure Communications, MediaAesthetics and Bong.""Bong?
" I asked, as Hornby drifted away again.
"I felt the word \_Art\_ didn't belong on the end of a string of syllableslike that, so I changed it to \_Bong\_," she said.
"The President was furious,but so far no one else official has noticed.
Maybe I'll try introducing bonginto the language.
People are tired of art, give them bong.
""For bong's sake," I murmured.
"\_How\_ do you advise?
""I buy, I make acquisitions for the President's collection.
He wants tobe the biggest bong collector since Goering.
He's heard what a good investmentit is, isn't that pathetic?
""Oh, I don't know.
Money is real, money endures.
All the noblestsentiments can be beautifully expressed in money.
If everyone showered artistswith money whenever they saw them, wouldn't this be a finer world?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129705</id>
	<title>B.I.N.G</title>
	<author>CptnQuixar</author>
	<datestamp>1243503120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ballmer Is Not Gates</p><p>Ballmer's Ideas Never Gel</p><p>Ballmer's Into Negating Google</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ballmer Is Not GatesBallmer 's Ideas Never GelBallmer 's Into Negating Google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ballmer Is Not GatesBallmer's Ideas Never GelBallmer's Into Negating Google</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127117</id>
	<title>Bing? Bing?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1243538700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy mother of marketing. They'd do better calling it "Microsoft Bling", at least it'd sound like something someone might actually want to use. This may be the worst product name since Bob.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy mother of marketing .
They 'd do better calling it " Microsoft Bling " , at least it 'd sound like something someone might actually want to use .
This may be the worst product name since Bob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy mother of marketing.
They'd do better calling it "Microsoft Bling", at least it'd sound like something someone might actually want to use.
This may be the worst product name since Bob.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126063</id>
	<title>A Microsoft Travel Aggregator?</title>
	<author>stoicfaux</author>
	<datestamp>1243535280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the examples in the video was searching for a flight/hotel/etc..  Is Bing trying to compete with existing travel sites?  Can a general search/decision engine outperform a dedicated travel site?  Is Bing going to be a threat to travel sites?
</p><p>Who decides how the decision engine decides?  How are the result categories created?  Are there a lot of MS employees creating categories based on typical search queries?  Will users be able to create or suggest categories?
</p><p>Will there be Bing specific HTML tags that sites can use to suggest what categories their site should belong to?
</p><p>Are they trying to be the Mac of search engines?
</p><p>Are there technical details on how Bing works?  It's still vaporware unless you're a MS employee.  Google and Live Search do not appear to have any technical details (or my search-fu is lacking.)
</p><p>Given the lack of details and the lack of a product, I'm not inclined to take this "decision engine" effort seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the examples in the video was searching for a flight/hotel/etc.. Is Bing trying to compete with existing travel sites ?
Can a general search/decision engine outperform a dedicated travel site ?
Is Bing going to be a threat to travel sites ?
Who decides how the decision engine decides ?
How are the result categories created ?
Are there a lot of MS employees creating categories based on typical search queries ?
Will users be able to create or suggest categories ?
Will there be Bing specific HTML tags that sites can use to suggest what categories their site should belong to ?
Are they trying to be the Mac of search engines ?
Are there technical details on how Bing works ?
It 's still vaporware unless you 're a MS employee .
Google and Live Search do not appear to have any technical details ( or my search-fu is lacking .
) Given the lack of details and the lack of a product , I 'm not inclined to take this " decision engine " effort seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the examples in the video was searching for a flight/hotel/etc..  Is Bing trying to compete with existing travel sites?
Can a general search/decision engine outperform a dedicated travel site?
Is Bing going to be a threat to travel sites?
Who decides how the decision engine decides?
How are the result categories created?
Are there a lot of MS employees creating categories based on typical search queries?
Will users be able to create or suggest categories?
Will there be Bing specific HTML tags that sites can use to suggest what categories their site should belong to?
Are they trying to be the Mac of search engines?
Are there technical details on how Bing works?
It's still vaporware unless you're a MS employee.
Google and Live Search do not appear to have any technical details (or my search-fu is lacking.
)
Given the lack of details and the lack of a product, I'm not inclined to take this "decision engine" effort seriously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128311</id>
	<title>neoneoneoconservativism</title>
	<author>karl3</author>
	<datestamp>1243541940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wow, "so you can feel confident you're not taking the advice of say a 13-year-old boy".

do we officially have neoneoneoconservativism!?
they even had to use the number 13...</htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , " so you can feel confident you 're not taking the advice of say a 13-year-old boy " .
do we officially have neoneoneoconservativism ! ?
they even had to use the number 13.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, "so you can feel confident you're not taking the advice of say a 13-year-old boy".
do we officially have neoneoneoconservativism!?
they even had to use the number 13...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126329</id>
	<title>Re:We use the search engine that goes bing!</title>
	<author>hoooocheymomma</author>
	<datestamp>1243536180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if you can use it to search for Holy Grails?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you can use it to search for Holy Grails ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you can use it to search for Holy Grails?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126007</id>
	<title>Re:cashback?</title>
	<author>harryandthehenderson</author>
	<datestamp>1243535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).</p></div><p>Yes, as in they have cloned the functionality of sites like Priceline.com.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool ( though pretty easy to clone ) .Yes , as in they have cloned the functionality of sites like Priceline.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price predictor thing sound kinda cool (though pretty easy to clone).Yes, as in they have cloned the functionality of sites like Priceline.com.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126179</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>BabyDuckHat</author>
	<datestamp>1243535700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh wait, nevermind. I already squirted it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait , nevermind .
I already squirted it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait, nevermind.
I already squirted it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243538460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actualy it's:</p><ul><li>1 - Make crappy search engine.</li><li>2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine</li><li>3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look</li><li>4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look</li><li>5 - Repeat step 3 at least twice</li><li>6 - ???</li><li>7 - PROFIT!!</li></ul><p>They're still in step 3.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actualy it 's : 1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look5 - Repeat step 3 at least twice6 - ? ?
? 7 - PROFIT !
! They 're still in step 3 .
        -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actualy it's:1 - Make crappy search engine.2 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine3 - Rebrand crappy search engine with new look4 - Fail at taking over the world with crappy search engine with new look5 - Repeat step 3 at least twice6 - ??
?7 - PROFIT!
!They're still in step 3.
        -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127885</id>
	<title>Re:Here's the problem</title>
	<author>kjart</author>
	<datestamp>1243540860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Informed decisions" and "organized results" are somehow corporatespeak? I think you are trying to find something that isn't actually there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Informed decisions " and " organized results " are somehow corporatespeak ?
I think you are trying to find something that is n't actually there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Informed decisions" and "organized results" are somehow corporatespeak?
I think you are trying to find something that isn't actually there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132547</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1243516440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Decision engine" = cheap clone of Wolfram|Alpha = experiment that might or might not be better than Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Decision engine " = cheap clone of Wolfram | Alpha = experiment that might or might not be better than Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Decision engine" = cheap clone of Wolfram|Alpha = experiment that might or might not be better than Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126109</id>
	<title>So many search engines lately</title>
	<author>merc</author>
	<datestamp>1243535400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really google serves all my needs pretty well and I can't imagine using anything else everyday.  There is a new search engine called topsy.com and it seems pretty cool but it seems more directed towards tweets, blogs, forums, etc..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really google serves all my needs pretty well and I ca n't imagine using anything else everyday .
There is a new search engine called topsy.com and it seems pretty cool but it seems more directed towards tweets , blogs , forums , etc. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really google serves all my needs pretty well and I can't imagine using anything else everyday.
There is a new search engine called topsy.com and it seems pretty cool but it seems more directed towards tweets, blogs, forums, etc..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127301</id>
	<title>Re:Give up</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1243539180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google...</p></div><p>That's exactly the point.  They believe they DO have some pretty neat features that can beat Google.  Or they will (Bing is still in development and not yet available to the public).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google...That 's exactly the point .
They believe they DO have some pretty neat features that can beat Google .
Or they will ( Bing is still in development and not yet available to the public ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...and unless you have some pretty neat features that can beat Google...That's exactly the point.
They believe they DO have some pretty neat features that can beat Google.
Or they will (Bing is still in development and not yet available to the public).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126017</id>
	<title>Re:Bing? Seriously?</title>
	<author>ILikeRed</author>
	<datestamp>1243535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but I predict people will start pronouncing it as "Bung". As in:<br> <br>
I went to google the answer, but this damn computer has the wrong search installed and my question went down the bung hole!
<br> <br>I love how the live desktop search tells you everything install chronologically after it is going to stop functioning if you remove the MS search. Well, maybe bung will finally let you find answers to technical issues <i>half</i> as well as google search - then MS might be able to bribe some more people to play with it's bung.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but I predict people will start pronouncing it as " Bung " .
As in : I went to google the answer , but this damn computer has the wrong search installed and my question went down the bung hole !
I love how the live desktop search tells you everything install chronologically after it is going to stop functioning if you remove the MS search .
Well , maybe bung will finally let you find answers to technical issues half as well as google search - then MS might be able to bribe some more people to play with it 's bung .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but I predict people will start pronouncing it as "Bung".
As in: 
I went to google the answer, but this damn computer has the wrong search installed and my question went down the bung hole!
I love how the live desktop search tells you everything install chronologically after it is going to stop functioning if you remove the MS search.
Well, maybe bung will finally let you find answers to technical issues half as well as google search - then MS might be able to bribe some more people to play with it's bung.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126097</id>
	<title>Bob's cousin Bing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243535400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, Bob's cousin Bing is finally getting out into public? I'm sure they'll spend a lot of time together, wherever Bob is now...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Bob 's cousin Bing is finally getting out into public ?
I 'm sure they 'll spend a lot of time together , wherever Bob is now... : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Bob's cousin Bing is finally getting out into public?
I'm sure they'll spend a lot of time together, wherever Bob is now... :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127575</id>
	<title>"Bing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bing" as in "Crosby"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bing " as in " Crosby " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bing" as in "Crosby"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131981</id>
	<title>In other news, the Crosby estate...</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1243513500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, the Crosby estate sues Microsoft for violation of trade dress in re: "Bing's Greatest Hits" volumes 1 through 94.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , the Crosby estate sues Microsoft for violation of trade dress in re : " Bing 's Greatest Hits " volumes 1 through 94 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, the Crosby estate sues Microsoft for violation of trade dress in re: "Bing's Greatest Hits" volumes 1 through 94.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130407</id>
	<title>Re:As in Chandler "Bing"?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243505940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126573</id>
	<title>Re:I can already tell it's going to suck...</title>
	<author>Mia'cova</author>
	<datestamp>1243536960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going to try this, you also need to set your country to United States. Just click the link along the top for the list of choices. I don't know which other countries, if any, the daily background image works for. Today's shot is a nice one of the Rio Grande..</p><p><a href="http://www.live.com/hps/RioGrande\_EN-US822195324.jpg" title="live.com">http://www.live.com/hps/RioGrande\_EN-US822195324.jpg</a> [live.com]</p><p>People archive the backgrounds so you can search for past ones too if desired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to try this , you also need to set your country to United States .
Just click the link along the top for the list of choices .
I do n't know which other countries , if any , the daily background image works for .
Today 's shot is a nice one of the Rio Grande..http : //www.live.com/hps/RioGrande \ _EN-US822195324.jpg [ live.com ] People archive the backgrounds so you can search for past ones too if desired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to try this, you also need to set your country to United States.
Just click the link along the top for the list of choices.
I don't know which other countries, if any, the daily background image works for.
Today's shot is a nice one of the Rio Grande..http://www.live.com/hps/RioGrande\_EN-US822195324.jpg [live.com]People archive the backgrounds so you can search for past ones too if desired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127217</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1243538940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do all of these VCs actually plan to monetize their investments in those cool Web 2.0 names? Do those social networking sites actually make any substantial non-advertising money? In an age when the American consumer is broke and the national credit card is maxed out how can money continue to pour into advertising? Besides, even if the social networking web 2.0 sites do start doing advertising or requiring subscriptions then someone will start up ZigZagZoodilyDoo with no Ads (at least to start) and pull away all of those fickle customers who don't have anything to spend anyway. The whole thing seems almost completely stupid to me. Who can possibly have 1,000+ "friends"? It doesn't make sense ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do all of these VCs actually plan to monetize their investments in those cool Web 2.0 names ?
Do those social networking sites actually make any substantial non-advertising money ?
In an age when the American consumer is broke and the national credit card is maxed out how can money continue to pour into advertising ?
Besides , even if the social networking web 2.0 sites do start doing advertising or requiring subscriptions then someone will start up ZigZagZoodilyDoo with no Ads ( at least to start ) and pull away all of those fickle customers who do n't have anything to spend anyway .
The whole thing seems almost completely stupid to me .
Who can possibly have 1,000 + " friends " ?
It does n't make sense ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury !
If Chewbacca lives on Endor , you must acquit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do all of these VCs actually plan to monetize their investments in those cool Web 2.0 names?
Do those social networking sites actually make any substantial non-advertising money?
In an age when the American consumer is broke and the national credit card is maxed out how can money continue to pour into advertising?
Besides, even if the social networking web 2.0 sites do start doing advertising or requiring subscriptions then someone will start up ZigZagZoodilyDoo with no Ads (at least to start) and pull away all of those fickle customers who don't have anything to spend anyway.
The whole thing seems almost completely stupid to me.
Who can possibly have 1,000+ "friends"?
It doesn't make sense ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury!
If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130315</id>
	<title>Re:Long-term pattern</title>
	<author>Archimonde</author>
	<datestamp>1243505580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is almost a common practice between mobile operators here in croatia. Every couple of months or less they introduce "new" services, which are nothing but reshuffled old ones. They will introduce "more flexible" pricing when in fact that is just another word for raising the current ones. And every month or so you will get some "special offers" which expire in a month leaving you with old pricing.</p><p>Similar to this, but more infuriating for business users was constant rebranding of our national mobile and land operator after the acquisition by t-com. iirc it went from HT, to T-HT to T-Com, (cronet-&gt;t-mobile etc) but worst of all, e-mail addresses went from @xx.tel.hr to @xx.hinet.hr to @xx.t-com.hr. That was great news for business users who had to change business cards every year or less. I'm even sure I missed a change or two in the mail addresses, and that easily explains why many people went with web based mail.</p><p>So this was not really a case of bad service (live.com comes to mind) but just changing name for the sake of looking fresh even though fundamentally nothing changes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is almost a common practice between mobile operators here in croatia .
Every couple of months or less they introduce " new " services , which are nothing but reshuffled old ones .
They will introduce " more flexible " pricing when in fact that is just another word for raising the current ones .
And every month or so you will get some " special offers " which expire in a month leaving you with old pricing.Similar to this , but more infuriating for business users was constant rebranding of our national mobile and land operator after the acquisition by t-com .
iirc it went from HT , to T-HT to T-Com , ( cronet- &gt; t-mobile etc ) but worst of all , e-mail addresses went from @ xx.tel.hr to @ xx.hinet.hr to @ xx.t-com.hr .
That was great news for business users who had to change business cards every year or less .
I 'm even sure I missed a change or two in the mail addresses , and that easily explains why many people went with web based mail.So this was not really a case of bad service ( live.com comes to mind ) but just changing name for the sake of looking fresh even though fundamentally nothing changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is almost a common practice between mobile operators here in croatia.
Every couple of months or less they introduce "new" services, which are nothing but reshuffled old ones.
They will introduce "more flexible" pricing when in fact that is just another word for raising the current ones.
And every month or so you will get some "special offers" which expire in a month leaving you with old pricing.Similar to this, but more infuriating for business users was constant rebranding of our national mobile and land operator after the acquisition by t-com.
iirc it went from HT, to T-HT to T-Com, (cronet-&gt;t-mobile etc) but worst of all, e-mail addresses went from @xx.tel.hr to @xx.hinet.hr to @xx.t-com.hr.
That was great news for business users who had to change business cards every year or less.
I'm even sure I missed a change or two in the mail addresses, and that easily explains why many people went with web based mail.So this was not really a case of bad service (live.com comes to mind) but just changing name for the sake of looking fresh even though fundamentally nothing changes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28148561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131759
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28176627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28159851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128019
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28216367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126625
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_139</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127301
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_140</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28137623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126253
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28146687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28139919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129853
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128447
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1650226_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129589
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126529
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126337
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126603
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125825
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127667
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127773
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127353
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130769
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28146687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125955
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126011
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28148561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28159851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126071
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130397
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127049
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28216367
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130435
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28137623
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125811
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129853
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129653
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132153
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126225
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28133449
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28139919
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128291
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28176627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28131939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130127
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126319
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126897
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130009
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28135859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28128403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127073
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28129703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28136365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28198275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127333
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28132633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28134201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28130103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28127625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126299
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28125657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1650226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1650226.28126331
</commentlist>
</conversation>
