<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_1617225</id>
	<title>Cancer Patient Held At Airport For Missing Fingerprints</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1243537080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>A 62-year-old man visiting his relatives in the US was held for four hours by immigration officials after <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE54Q42P20090527?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=oddlyEnoughNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true">they could not detect his fingerprints because of a cancer drug</a> he was taking. The man was prescribed capecitabine, a drug used to treat cancers in the head, neck, breast, and stomach. Some of the drug's side-effects include chronic inflammation of the palms or soles of the feet, which can cause the skin to peel or bleed. "This can give rise to eradication of fingerprints with time," explained Tan Eng Huat, senior consultant in the medical oncology department at Singapore's National Cancer Center. "Theoretically, if you stop the drug, it will grow back, but details are scanty. No one knows the frequency of this occurrence among patients taking this drug and nobody knows how long a person must be on this drug before the loss of fingerprints," he added.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 62-year-old man visiting his relatives in the US was held for four hours by immigration officials after they could not detect his fingerprints because of a cancer drug he was taking .
The man was prescribed capecitabine , a drug used to treat cancers in the head , neck , breast , and stomach .
Some of the drug 's side-effects include chronic inflammation of the palms or soles of the feet , which can cause the skin to peel or bleed .
" This can give rise to eradication of fingerprints with time , " explained Tan Eng Huat , senior consultant in the medical oncology department at Singapore 's National Cancer Center .
" Theoretically , if you stop the drug , it will grow back , but details are scanty .
No one knows the frequency of this occurrence among patients taking this drug and nobody knows how long a person must be on this drug before the loss of fingerprints , " he added .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 62-year-old man visiting his relatives in the US was held for four hours by immigration officials after they could not detect his fingerprints because of a cancer drug he was taking.
The man was prescribed capecitabine, a drug used to treat cancers in the head, neck, breast, and stomach.
Some of the drug's side-effects include chronic inflammation of the palms or soles of the feet, which can cause the skin to peel or bleed.
"This can give rise to eradication of fingerprints with time," explained Tan Eng Huat, senior consultant in the medical oncology department at Singapore's National Cancer Center.
"Theoretically, if you stop the drug, it will grow back, but details are scanty.
No one knows the frequency of this occurrence among patients taking this drug and nobody knows how long a person must be on this drug before the loss of fingerprints," he added.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128869</id>
	<title>Re:Well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Jav,

Why don't you contract cancer and then travel overseas to visit relatives perhaps one last time and then spend 4 hours out of your precious few at the airport while some nitwit scrutinizes you to no end?!? Then come back here and tell us "it ended well."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It ended well so this is hardly a controversy .
Jav , Why do n't you contract cancer and then travel overseas to visit relatives perhaps one last time and then spend 4 hours out of your precious few at the airport while some nitwit scrutinizes you to no end ? ! ?
Then come back here and tell us " it ended well .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.
Jav,

Why don't you contract cancer and then travel overseas to visit relatives perhaps one last time and then spend 4 hours out of your precious few at the airport while some nitwit scrutinizes you to no end?!?
Then come back here and tell us "it ended well.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128499</id>
	<title>Cancer Drugs? Not for him!</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1243542420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He should have said that the drugs were for his Goat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He should have said that the drugs were for his Goat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should have said that the drugs were for his Goat!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131723</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243512240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope you repeat this to the firefighters, police, paramedics and other government employees who do wonderful service and save lives every day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope you repeat this to the firefighters , police , paramedics and other government employees who do wonderful service and save lives every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope you repeat this to the firefighters, police, paramedics and other government employees who do wonderful service and save lives every day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132087</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243514040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's their job all right. They just don't do it very well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's their job all right .
They just do n't do it very well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's their job all right.
They just don't do it very well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035</id>
	<title>Headline on Fox News tonight:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</id>
	<title>This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From a medical and oncological perspective, this is very interesting stuff.</p><p>From a DHS/security/evil overlord angle, it's absolutely nothing at all.</p><p>The guy was screened routinely. He failed the screening for an extraordinary reason, and was kept for four measly hours, until they could parse and process the exception.</p><p>That's it. They didn't strip-search him, they didn't tase him, they didn't abuse him or violate his rights. They came across an exception, dealt with it, and moved on.</p><p>Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like, "Police do their job. Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From a medical and oncological perspective , this is very interesting stuff.From a DHS/security/evil overlord angle , it 's absolutely nothing at all.The guy was screened routinely .
He failed the screening for an extraordinary reason , and was kept for four measly hours , until they could parse and process the exception.That 's it .
They did n't strip-search him , they did n't tase him , they did n't abuse him or violate his rights .
They came across an exception , dealt with it , and moved on.Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like , " Police do their job .
Bring in suspect for questioning , and then release him after innocence proven .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From a medical and oncological perspective, this is very interesting stuff.From a DHS/security/evil overlord angle, it's absolutely nothing at all.The guy was screened routinely.
He failed the screening for an extraordinary reason, and was kept for four measly hours, until they could parse and process the exception.That's it.
They didn't strip-search him, they didn't tase him, they didn't abuse him or violate his rights.
They came across an exception, dealt with it, and moved on.Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like, "Police do their job.
Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130547</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1243506540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had 8 hour delays because the FAA grounded my plane because the airline "forgot" schedule routine service for it. Needless to say I won't use that airline again, if my time and safety doesn't mean anything to them. I think we all have airline horror stories about delays and abuse from incompetence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had 8 hour delays because the FAA grounded my plane because the airline " forgot " schedule routine service for it .
Needless to say I wo n't use that airline again , if my time and safety does n't mean anything to them .
I think we all have airline horror stories about delays and abuse from incompetence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had 8 hour delays because the FAA grounded my plane because the airline "forgot" schedule routine service for it.
Needless to say I won't use that airline again, if my time and safety doesn't mean anything to them.
I think we all have airline horror stories about delays and abuse from incompetence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129831</id>
	<title>Re:Cancer Patient might be an alien...</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1243503720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just when you think you've got that atrocity erased from your mind...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just when you think you 've got that atrocity erased from your mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just when you think you've got that atrocity erased from your mind...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128509</id>
	<title>Where does that image come from?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heck, where does the fingerprint image come from? I am pretty sure it was an image from the results section of my master dissertation!! I was not aware that somebody beyond me read it, much less one of the images would end in Slashdot!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , where does the fingerprint image come from ?
I am pretty sure it was an image from the results section of my master dissertation ! !
I was not aware that somebody beyond me read it , much less one of the images would end in Slashdot !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, where does the fingerprint image come from?
I am pretty sure it was an image from the results section of my master dissertation!!
I was not aware that somebody beyond me read it, much less one of the images would end in Slashdot!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129363</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>nasor</author>
	<datestamp>1243501980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So did they subject your wife to some sort of extraordinary, non-fingerprint-related background check? Or do they just shrug and exempt people from the requirement if the person doesn't have fingerprints?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So did they subject your wife to some sort of extraordinary , non-fingerprint-related background check ?
Or do they just shrug and exempt people from the requirement if the person does n't have fingerprints ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So did they subject your wife to some sort of extraordinary, non-fingerprint-related background check?
Or do they just shrug and exempt people from the requirement if the person doesn't have fingerprints?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133243</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1243519980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My dad has no useful fingerprints on his hand.  His skin is so dry on his hands that the entire gripping surface is more like one giant callus, worn smooth from manual labor, than actual living skin cells.  I've seen him use his bare hands to sand a piece of wood.</p><p>That fingerprints are useful and unique, does not make them universal.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My dad has no useful fingerprints on his hand .
His skin is so dry on his hands that the entire gripping surface is more like one giant callus , worn smooth from manual labor , than actual living skin cells .
I 've seen him use his bare hands to sand a piece of wood.That fingerprints are useful and unique , does not make them universal .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My dad has no useful fingerprints on his hand.
His skin is so dry on his hands that the entire gripping surface is more like one giant callus, worn smooth from manual labor, than actual living skin cells.
I've seen him use his bare hands to sand a piece of wood.That fingerprints are useful and unique, does not make them universal.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133383</id>
	<title>Re:This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243521060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because you shouldn't have to prove your innocence?</p><p>(Just kidding, I know that last bit was simply a slip of the fingers/toungue, and I agree with your analysis - the situation was handled fine.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because you should n't have to prove your innocence ?
( Just kidding , I know that last bit was simply a slip of the fingers/toungue , and I agree with your analysis - the situation was handled fine .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because you shouldn't have to prove your innocence?
(Just kidding, I know that last bit was simply a slip of the fingers/toungue, and I agree with your analysis - the situation was handled fine.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133333</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1243520640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your wife has a history of violence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your wife has a history of violence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your wife has a history of violence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130739</id>
	<title>Re:Headline on Fox News tonight:</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1243507560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's at least one other,  more common, case, where someone who's lost the use of their hands no longer touches things enough to rub off the dead skin which erodes away to leave the ridges and grooves of your fingerprints.</p><p>I saw it on TV, it's totally true.</p><p>Also, I would have guessed you were the one frying your brains out via bong, judging from the severe paranoia you seem to suffer from ('OMG NO FINGERPRINTS HE MUST BE UP TO NO GOOD CAUSE THE BAD GUYS IN MOVIES USED ACID ON THEIR FINGERS TO BE SNEAKY OMG').</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's at least one other , more common , case , where someone who 's lost the use of their hands no longer touches things enough to rub off the dead skin which erodes away to leave the ridges and grooves of your fingerprints.I saw it on TV , it 's totally true.Also , I would have guessed you were the one frying your brains out via bong , judging from the severe paranoia you seem to suffer from ( 'OMG NO FINGERPRINTS HE MUST BE UP TO NO GOOD CAUSE THE BAD GUYS IN MOVIES USED ACID ON THEIR FINGERS TO BE SNEAKY OMG ' ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's at least one other,  more common, case, where someone who's lost the use of their hands no longer touches things enough to rub off the dead skin which erodes away to leave the ridges and grooves of your fingerprints.I saw it on TV, it's totally true.Also, I would have guessed you were the one frying your brains out via bong, judging from the severe paranoia you seem to suffer from ('OMG NO FINGERPRINTS HE MUST BE UP TO NO GOOD CAUSE THE BAD GUYS IN MOVIES USED ACID ON THEIR FINGERS TO BE SNEAKY OMG').</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136439</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>tygerstripes</author>
	<datestamp>1243595460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree entirely. This is the system working as it should.
</p><p>Given that - on a busy day - you can already spend more than an hour getting through customs, passport control and so on, being detained for four hours doesn't sound so exceptional.
</p><p>I think any sensible, intelligent person in the border-guards' position would have taken about as long to clear this guy. He had no fingerprints, which is cause for some concern and suspicion when this is a requirement for border-entry. Personally, I would have taken all his details, interviewed him to find his explanation - possibly requiring the services of a translator - tracked down a medical or pharmaceutical professional with knowledge of the drug, obtained written confirmation of the side-effects, and finally documented the whole damned thing.
</p><p>Given that the article was very light on detail about the detention itself, and focussed more on the medical issues around the drug, people have been very quick to rattle their sabres and beat their chests about how dumb and unreasonable the security procedure was.
</p><p>Four hours sounds more than reasonable in the circumstances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree entirely .
This is the system working as it should .
Given that - on a busy day - you can already spend more than an hour getting through customs , passport control and so on , being detained for four hours does n't sound so exceptional .
I think any sensible , intelligent person in the border-guards ' position would have taken about as long to clear this guy .
He had no fingerprints , which is cause for some concern and suspicion when this is a requirement for border-entry .
Personally , I would have taken all his details , interviewed him to find his explanation - possibly requiring the services of a translator - tracked down a medical or pharmaceutical professional with knowledge of the drug , obtained written confirmation of the side-effects , and finally documented the whole damned thing .
Given that the article was very light on detail about the detention itself , and focussed more on the medical issues around the drug , people have been very quick to rattle their sabres and beat their chests about how dumb and unreasonable the security procedure was .
Four hours sounds more than reasonable in the circumstances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree entirely.
This is the system working as it should.
Given that - on a busy day - you can already spend more than an hour getting through customs, passport control and so on, being detained for four hours doesn't sound so exceptional.
I think any sensible, intelligent person in the border-guards' position would have taken about as long to clear this guy.
He had no fingerprints, which is cause for some concern and suspicion when this is a requirement for border-entry.
Personally, I would have taken all his details, interviewed him to find his explanation - possibly requiring the services of a translator - tracked down a medical or pharmaceutical professional with knowledge of the drug, obtained written confirmation of the side-effects, and finally documented the whole damned thing.
Given that the article was very light on detail about the detention itself, and focussed more on the medical issues around the drug, people have been very quick to rattle their sabres and beat their chests about how dumb and unreasonable the security procedure was.
Four hours sounds more than reasonable in the circumstances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243504980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When government officials detain you for whatever they want, and nobody thinks its a big deal, then truly, the terrorists have won.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When government officials detain you for whatever they want , and nobody thinks its a big deal , then truly , the terrorists have won .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When government officials detain you for whatever they want, and nobody thinks its a big deal, then truly, the terrorists have won.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>internerdj</author>
	<datestamp>1243541340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had a friend in high school whose family owned a catfish restaurant.  He had been helping out at the restaurant for many years and by the time he was 17-18 had no discernible fingerprints either.  It most certainly cannot be the first case where someone passed through without fingerprints.  It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he couldn't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a friend in high school whose family owned a catfish restaurant .
He had been helping out at the restaurant for many years and by the time he was 17-18 had no discernible fingerprints either .
It most certainly can not be the first case where someone passed through without fingerprints .
It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he could n't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a friend in high school whose family owned a catfish restaurant.
He had been helping out at the restaurant for many years and by the time he was 17-18 had no discernible fingerprints either.
It most certainly cannot be the first case where someone passed through without fingerprints.
It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he couldn't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130097</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>pcolaman</author>
	<datestamp>1243504920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's nothing.  I had my fingerprints removed so that I could become a terrorist...wait, there's a knock at the door, I'll be right</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing .
I had my fingerprints removed so that I could become a terrorist...wait , there 's a knock at the door , I 'll be right</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing.
I had my fingerprints removed so that I could become a terrorist...wait, there's a knock at the door, I'll be right</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130209</id>
	<title>Re:4 hours?</title>
	<author>pcolaman</author>
	<datestamp>1243505280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or perhaps there isn't a drive-thru for thorough background checks.  They'd call it McScreenalds</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or perhaps there is n't a drive-thru for thorough background checks .
They 'd call it McScreenalds</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or perhaps there isn't a drive-thru for thorough background checks.
They'd call it McScreenalds</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128279</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134239</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some people have faint ridges.  I had to give six sets of fingerprints when I got a job at a bank and when i once wanted to be a police officer i spent 30 minutes with a detective and a high tech fingerprinting machine before he could get a good print.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some people have faint ridges .
I had to give six sets of fingerprints when I got a job at a bank and when i once wanted to be a police officer i spent 30 minutes with a detective and a high tech fingerprinting machine before he could get a good print .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some people have faint ridges.
I had to give six sets of fingerprints when I got a job at a bank and when i once wanted to be a police officer i spent 30 minutes with a detective and a high tech fingerprinting machine before he could get a good print.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131043</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Nick Ives</author>
	<datestamp>1243508820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course the real genius behind this is that by detaining this guy they've drawn more attention to the existence of drugs that can remove your fingerprints. Now terrorists and other criminals can safely travel by claiming they've recently had cancer, no more suspicious acid burns on your fingertips!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course the real genius behind this is that by detaining this guy they 've drawn more attention to the existence of drugs that can remove your fingerprints .
Now terrorists and other criminals can safely travel by claiming they 've recently had cancer , no more suspicious acid burns on your fingertips !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course the real genius behind this is that by detaining this guy they've drawn more attention to the existence of drugs that can remove your fingerprints.
Now terrorists and other criminals can safely travel by claiming they've recently had cancer, no more suspicious acid burns on your fingertips!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130941</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone?</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, yes:</p><p>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html [nwsource.com]</p></div><p>And if you read that article, the frisking and undressing, and all the elaborate procedures failed to detect this guy. What it came down to was simple, old-fashioned gut instinct on the part of a human. He asked questions, noticed the guy behaving strangely, and they were going to proceed to the searching stage when the guy ran. So as a detection measure all the other security failed, and the original posters question still stands- when have all the elaborate security procedures netted a terrorist?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone ? Actually , yes : http : //seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html [ nwsource.com ] And if you read that article , the frisking and undressing , and all the elaborate procedures failed to detect this guy .
What it came down to was simple , old-fashioned gut instinct on the part of a human .
He asked questions , noticed the guy behaving strangely , and they were going to proceed to the searching stage when the guy ran .
So as a detection measure all the other security failed , and the original posters question still stands- when have all the elaborate security procedures netted a terrorist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone?Actually, yes:http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html [nwsource.com]And if you read that article, the frisking and undressing, and all the elaborate procedures failed to detect this guy.
What it came down to was simple, old-fashioned gut instinct on the part of a human.
He asked questions, noticed the guy behaving strangely, and they were going to proceed to the searching stage when the guy ran.
So as a detection measure all the other security failed, and the original posters question still stands- when have all the elaborate security procedures netted a terrorist?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129167</id>
	<title>Re:Headline on Fox News tonight:</title>
	<author>x\_IamSpartacus\_x</author>
	<datestamp>1243501320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are Tyrannosauruses and we must listen to their phone calls!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are Tyrannosauruses and we must listen to their phone calls !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are Tyrannosauruses and we must listen to their phone calls!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28144685</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously</title>
	<author>Jorgandar</author>
	<datestamp>1243595700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why cant we just ban cancer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why cant we just ban cancer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why cant we just ban cancer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130367</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for a cancer patient, four hours wasted is a huge deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for a cancer patient , four hours wasted is a huge deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for a cancer patient, four hours wasted is a huge deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145</id>
	<title>Obviously</title>
	<author>TibbonZero</author>
	<datestamp>1243541520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We must ban anti-cancer drugs. The terrorists might use them. Terrorists could hurt children. Think of the children!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We must ban anti-cancer drugs .
The terrorists might use them .
Terrorists could hurt children .
Think of the children !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We must ban anti-cancer drugs.
The terrorists might use them.
Terrorists could hurt children.
Think of the children!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129311</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243501800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you should stop her shoving her fingers up your ass?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should stop her shoving her fingers up your ass ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should stop her shoving her fingers up your ass?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128439</id>
	<title>This is appalling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having just lost my father to pancreatic cancer, and seeing him suffer so much from the chemo and other drugs he was taking, I can't believe that something like this would happen in an airport.  It's hard enough having to deal with the cancer and the side effects of the treatement without having getting held at an airport because of your side effects!  Airports might want to start treating their customers like HUMAN beings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having just lost my father to pancreatic cancer , and seeing him suffer so much from the chemo and other drugs he was taking , I ca n't believe that something like this would happen in an airport .
It 's hard enough having to deal with the cancer and the side effects of the treatement without having getting held at an airport because of your side effects !
Airports might want to start treating their customers like HUMAN beings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having just lost my father to pancreatic cancer, and seeing him suffer so much from the chemo and other drugs he was taking, I can't believe that something like this would happen in an airport.
It's hard enough having to deal with the cancer and the side effects of the treatement without having getting held at an airport because of your side effects!
Airports might want to start treating their customers like HUMAN beings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128841</id>
	<title>Re:Well</title>
	<author>legirons</author>
	<datestamp>1243543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What choice do they have? It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug. It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.</p></div><p>How many flights have you arrived for where a 4-hour delay wouldn't have caused huge problems for you?</p><p>Most airlines I know, you lose your flight if you don't get through security on time, and if you can't pay for a much more expensive ticket on the next flight then you might lose your entire holiday</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What choice do they have ?
It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug .
It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.How many flights have you arrived for where a 4-hour delay would n't have caused huge problems for you ? Most airlines I know , you lose your flight if you do n't get through security on time , and if you ca n't pay for a much more expensive ticket on the next flight then you might lose your entire holiday</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What choice do they have?
It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug.
It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.How many flights have you arrived for where a 4-hour delay wouldn't have caused huge problems for you?Most airlines I know, you lose your flight if you don't get through security on time, and if you can't pay for a much more expensive ticket on the next flight then you might lose your entire holiday
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131987</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1243513560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole reason we have this law is to keep all Arab chronic masturbators out of our country!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole reason we have this law is to keep all Arab chronic masturbators out of our country !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole reason we have this law is to keep all Arab chronic masturbators out of our country!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130649</id>
	<title>Re:This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243507020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven."</p></div><p>In the United States, the burden of proof is on finding guilt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bring in suspect for questioning , and then release him after innocence proven .
" In the United States , the burden of proof is on finding guilt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven.
"In the United States, the burden of proof is on finding guilt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136211</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243591980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A few years ago I would have laughed. In a future near you it might just happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A few years ago I would have laughed .
In a future near you it might just happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few years ago I would have laughed.
In a future near you it might just happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133759</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1243524120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fact that your comment got modded informative is proof that your sig is correct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that your comment got modded informative is proof that your sig is correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that your comment got modded informative is proof that your sig is correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130825</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1243507860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cuz, you know...it's not like a terrorist or some wanted felon would think to try and sneak on a plane by taking a drug that masked his fingerprints.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and I'm sure no one would be at all outraged if he managed to get into the cockpit and fly the plane into crash it into something.<br>I'm sure you'd give the guy taking the fingerprints a pass on his failure to follow the protocol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cuz , you know...it 's not like a terrorist or some wanted felon would think to try and sneak on a plane by taking a drug that masked his fingerprints .
...and I 'm sure no one would be at all outraged if he managed to get into the cockpit and fly the plane into crash it into something.I 'm sure you 'd give the guy taking the fingerprints a pass on his failure to follow the protocol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cuz, you know...it's not like a terrorist or some wanted felon would think to try and sneak on a plane by taking a drug that masked his fingerprints.
...and I'm sure no one would be at all outraged if he managed to get into the cockpit and fly the plane into crash it into something.I'm sure you'd give the guy taking the fingerprints a pass on his failure to follow the protocol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131201</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1243509540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno, I'm <i>stumped</i>.<br>(ducks)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , I 'm stumped .
( ducks )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, I'm stumped.
(ducks)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130693</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243507260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No

When your mothers and daughters are wearing a hijab, and you aren't allowed to drink beer or eat pork, then the terrorists have one.

It's not their goal to just take our freedoms away, that is an effect of the real goal, of implementing the totalitarian rule of Islam world wide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No When your mothers and daughters are wearing a hijab , and you are n't allowed to drink beer or eat pork , then the terrorists have one .
It 's not their goal to just take our freedoms away , that is an effect of the real goal , of implementing the totalitarian rule of Islam world wide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No

When your mothers and daughters are wearing a hijab, and you aren't allowed to drink beer or eat pork, then the terrorists have one.
It's not their goal to just take our freedoms away, that is an effect of the real goal, of implementing the totalitarian rule of Islam world wide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128129</id>
	<title>Oh, piff</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1243541460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is all just minutiae, people!<br> <br>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutiae" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutiae</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is all just minutiae , people !
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutiae [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is all just minutiae, people!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutiae [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129917</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>darthwader</author>
	<datestamp>1243504140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not do both?  Protocol is: get fingerprint.  If you cannot get a fingerprint, then you should use your discretion and initiative, e.g.:<br>- carefully and thoroughly interview the visitor.<br>- understand and verify the person's reason for not having a fingerprint.<br>- understand why the person is visiting the country.<br>- determine whether this person is likely to be a risk or not.<br>- decide if the person should be allowed into the country despite the lack of fingerprints.</p><p>If the border guards didn't want to think, they would have just deported him right away.  They were willing to think.  They did think.  They interviewed him, thought about what he said,possibly spent some time verifying what he said, maybe consulted other people, and in the end they decided he was an acceptable risk.  The process took 4 hours.  It seems reasonable to me.</p><p>I think this shows a system working perfectly.  The normal case (over 99\% of the time, I would guess) is a few seconds for a fingerprint.  The exceptions are dealt with on a case-by-case basis, with a thorough interview and careful consideration (not a stupid snap judgment).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not do both ?
Protocol is : get fingerprint .
If you can not get a fingerprint , then you should use your discretion and initiative , e.g .
: - carefully and thoroughly interview the visitor.- understand and verify the person 's reason for not having a fingerprint.- understand why the person is visiting the country.- determine whether this person is likely to be a risk or not.- decide if the person should be allowed into the country despite the lack of fingerprints.If the border guards did n't want to think , they would have just deported him right away .
They were willing to think .
They did think .
They interviewed him , thought about what he said,possibly spent some time verifying what he said , maybe consulted other people , and in the end they decided he was an acceptable risk .
The process took 4 hours .
It seems reasonable to me.I think this shows a system working perfectly .
The normal case ( over 99 \ % of the time , I would guess ) is a few seconds for a fingerprint .
The exceptions are dealt with on a case-by-case basis , with a thorough interview and careful consideration ( not a stupid snap judgment ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not do both?
Protocol is: get fingerprint.
If you cannot get a fingerprint, then you should use your discretion and initiative, e.g.
:- carefully and thoroughly interview the visitor.- understand and verify the person's reason for not having a fingerprint.- understand why the person is visiting the country.- determine whether this person is likely to be a risk or not.- decide if the person should be allowed into the country despite the lack of fingerprints.If the border guards didn't want to think, they would have just deported him right away.
They were willing to think.
They did think.
They interviewed him, thought about what he said,possibly spent some time verifying what he said, maybe consulted other people, and in the end they decided he was an acceptable risk.
The process took 4 hours.
It seems reasonable to me.I think this shows a system working perfectly.
The normal case (over 99\% of the time, I would guess) is a few seconds for a fingerprint.
The exceptions are dealt with on a case-by-case basis, with a thorough interview and careful consideration (not a stupid snap judgment).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130905</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who has won when citizens think they have a "right" to totally unrestricted air travel. In which article of the Constitution is that hidden?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who has won when citizens think they have a " right " to totally unrestricted air travel .
In which article of the Constitution is that hidden ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who has won when citizens think they have a "right" to totally unrestricted air travel.
In which article of the Constitution is that hidden?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134643</id>
	<title>Re:Headline on Fox News tonight:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Headline on Countdown with Keith Olbermann tonight:</p><p>Airport detention Bush's fault.  Border officials worse than terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Headline on Countdown with Keith Olbermann tonight : Airport detention Bush 's fault .
Border officials worse than terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headline on Countdown with Keith Olbermann tonight:Airport detention Bush's fault.
Border officials worse than terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137381</id>
	<title>Re:This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>Alioth</author>
	<datestamp>1243604760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like, "Police do their job. Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven."</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, that would be shocking. The burden of proof is not on the suspect, but on the accusers. You don't get to prove your innocence, the law has to prove your guilt. A system of innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like , " Police do their job .
Bring in suspect for questioning , and then release him after innocence proven .
" Actually , that would be shocking .
The burden of proof is not on the suspect , but on the accusers .
You do n't get to prove your innocence , the law has to prove your guilt .
A system of innocent until proven guilty , not guilty until proven innocent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or would you rather spend all day making up SHOCKING headlines for articles like, "Police do their job.
Bring in suspect for questioning, and then release him after innocence proven.
"Actually, that would be shocking.
The burden of proof is not on the suspect, but on the accusers.
You don't get to prove your innocence, the law has to prove your guilt.
A system of innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128435</id>
	<title>4 hours</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's 4 hours of his life he will never get back, and that's saying something for a cancer patient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's 4 hours of his life he will never get back , and that 's saying something for a cancer patient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's 4 hours of his life he will never get back, and that's saying something for a cancer patient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129259</id>
	<title>Eradication of fingerprints?</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1243501620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Usually, you don't want to take anticancer drugs unless you have cancer.<p>
If you want to get rid of your fingerprints, there's always pineapple juice. Much less poisonous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually , you do n't want to take anticancer drugs unless you have cancer .
If you want to get rid of your fingerprints , there 's always pineapple juice .
Much less poisonous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually, you don't want to take anticancer drugs unless you have cancer.
If you want to get rid of your fingerprints, there's always pineapple juice.
Much less poisonous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129053</id>
	<title>Re:Off topic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243544160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to be related to using NoScript and not allowing fsdn.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to be related to using NoScript and not allowing fsdn.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to be related to using NoScript and not allowing fsdn.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132647</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243516800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, then she should stop complaining when he forgets their anniversary.  It's her fault for zapping his memory so often.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , then she should stop complaining when he forgets their anniversary .
It 's her fault for zapping his memory so often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, then she should stop complaining when he forgets their anniversary.
It's her fault for zapping his memory so often.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131311</id>
	<title>You think like a ReThuglican Jew</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think like a ReThuglican Jew</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think like a ReThuglican Jew</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think like a ReThuglican Jew</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130561</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would have still found this stuff out with the old not-pinapple-up-your-ass techniques.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would have still found this stuff out with the old not-pinapple-up-your-ass techniques .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would have still found this stuff out with the old not-pinapple-up-your-ass techniques.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1243505280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What... you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?  Wow.  Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What... you 'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security ?
Wow. Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government 's job is to protect the borders.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What... you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?
Wow.  Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134633</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullcrap.  For one thing, they didn't detain him for "whatever they wanted".  He was detained because they couldn't scan his fingerprints.  For another thing, he is a foreigner.  For foreigners, entering the United States is a privilege.  They have no right to be here.  If they want to enter this country, they have to abide by our laws.  If they don't like it, don't come here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullcrap .
For one thing , they did n't detain him for " whatever they wanted " .
He was detained because they could n't scan his fingerprints .
For another thing , he is a foreigner .
For foreigners , entering the United States is a privilege .
They have no right to be here .
If they want to enter this country , they have to abide by our laws .
If they do n't like it , do n't come here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullcrap.
For one thing, they didn't detain him for "whatever they wanted".
He was detained because they couldn't scan his fingerprints.
For another thing, he is a foreigner.
For foreigners, entering the United States is a privilege.
They have no right to be here.
If they want to enter this country, they have to abide by our laws.
If they don't like it, don't come here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129973</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Chabil Ha'</author>
	<datestamp>1243504380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simply because they're not paid to think.  They're drones.  If they started showing signs of unique thought and it turned out to be 'the wrong thing', then they'd be out of a job, replaced by another drone.  Following protocol is greater assurance of continued employment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simply because they 're not paid to think .
They 're drones .
If they started showing signs of unique thought and it turned out to be 'the wrong thing ' , then they 'd be out of a job , replaced by another drone .
Following protocol is greater assurance of continued employment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simply because they're not paid to think.
They're drones.
If they started showing signs of unique thought and it turned out to be 'the wrong thing', then they'd be out of a job, replaced by another drone.
Following protocol is greater assurance of continued employment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129651</id>
	<title>My sister was held back too!</title>
	<author>KreAture</author>
	<datestamp>1243502940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My sister has Nethertons Syndrome. It's relevant implication for this case is that her skin is replaced faster than normal. This causes her to have weak if any fingerprints.</p><p>When visiting Florida for christmas last year my entire family was held back for about half an hour.  Only after the "security person" had consulted his superior, and that superior had consulted yet another superior, were this 16 year old obvious thread to national security allowed to pass into America. They also tried to wipe her fingertips with alcohol.  Very pleasant on what you can compare to a first to second degree burn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My sister has Nethertons Syndrome .
It 's relevant implication for this case is that her skin is replaced faster than normal .
This causes her to have weak if any fingerprints.When visiting Florida for christmas last year my entire family was held back for about half an hour .
Only after the " security person " had consulted his superior , and that superior had consulted yet another superior , were this 16 year old obvious thread to national security allowed to pass into America .
They also tried to wipe her fingertips with alcohol .
Very pleasant on what you can compare to a first to second degree burn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My sister has Nethertons Syndrome.
It's relevant implication for this case is that her skin is replaced faster than normal.
This causes her to have weak if any fingerprints.When visiting Florida for christmas last year my entire family was held back for about half an hour.
Only after the "security person" had consulted his superior, and that superior had consulted yet another superior, were this 16 year old obvious thread to national security allowed to pass into America.
They also tried to wipe her fingertips with alcohol.
Very pleasant on what you can compare to a first to second degree burn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129515</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1243502520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We're from the government, and we're here to help you!</p></div><p>Uh, what's that got to do with anything?  When would that have been said during this exchange?  I mean, customs officials don't say "we're from the government" and they DEFINITELY don't say "We're here to help you."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're from the government , and we 're here to help you ! Uh , what 's that got to do with anything ?
When would that have been said during this exchange ?
I mean , customs officials do n't say " we 're from the government " and they DEFINITELY do n't say " We 're here to help you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're from the government, and we're here to help you!Uh, what's that got to do with anything?
When would that have been said during this exchange?
I mean, customs officials don't say "we're from the government" and they DEFINITELY don't say "We're here to help you.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131491</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1243511040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your post doesn't make any sense.</p><p>Are you saying that the government ought *not* be involved in aviation security?   Or that we just have to live with this kind of thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your post does n't make any sense.Are you saying that the government ought * not * be involved in aviation security ?
Or that we just have to live with this kind of thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your post doesn't make any sense.Are you saying that the government ought *not* be involved in aviation security?
Or that we just have to live with this kind of thing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128529</id>
	<title>Bunch of idiots!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A fingerprint is an image of the fingers (duh!).</p><p>If the authorities don't like this guy's fingers and the images of his fingers, the problem is with the authorities.</p><p>The real problem is that a person's fingerprints is not a definitive unique permanent identifier, even though most people treat them that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A fingerprint is an image of the fingers ( duh !
) .If the authorities do n't like this guy 's fingers and the images of his fingers , the problem is with the authorities.The real problem is that a person 's fingerprints is not a definitive unique permanent identifier , even though most people treat them that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A fingerprint is an image of the fingers (duh!
).If the authorities don't like this guy's fingers and the images of his fingers, the problem is with the authorities.The real problem is that a person's fingerprints is not a definitive unique permanent identifier, even though most people treat them that way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136065</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>timlyg</author>
	<datestamp>1243590180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This immigration thing by Americans is just getting more and more funny.</p><p>First of all, how can a country be so rich while its neighbors so poor? American Embassies walls just keep growing higher and higher.<br>Secondly, you really think you are that worth it? Don't forget, each of you have a large sum of national debt...even your every child and baby. What is it now, $40,000 per head?<br>Thirdly, now you have to create money out of no where to keep your ways of living. That's pathetic...You simply just cannot perverse the natural order of things.</p><p>Go ahead now, get yourself detained at airports by your own people, for the sake of illegal immigrants, yea, sure. They take your jobs, blame all the terrorism and crimes on them while you lay satisfyingly in the detainee office and say "thank you uncle sam, we did it!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This immigration thing by Americans is just getting more and more funny.First of all , how can a country be so rich while its neighbors so poor ?
American Embassies walls just keep growing higher and higher.Secondly , you really think you are that worth it ?
Do n't forget , each of you have a large sum of national debt...even your every child and baby .
What is it now , $ 40,000 per head ? Thirdly , now you have to create money out of no where to keep your ways of living .
That 's pathetic...You simply just can not perverse the natural order of things.Go ahead now , get yourself detained at airports by your own people , for the sake of illegal immigrants , yea , sure .
They take your jobs , blame all the terrorism and crimes on them while you lay satisfyingly in the detainee office and say " thank you uncle sam , we did it !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This immigration thing by Americans is just getting more and more funny.First of all, how can a country be so rich while its neighbors so poor?
American Embassies walls just keep growing higher and higher.Secondly, you really think you are that worth it?
Don't forget, each of you have a large sum of national debt...even your every child and baby.
What is it now, $40,000 per head?Thirdly, now you have to create money out of no where to keep your ways of living.
That's pathetic...You simply just cannot perverse the natural order of things.Go ahead now, get yourself detained at airports by your own people, for the sake of illegal immigrants, yea, sure.
They take your jobs, blame all the terrorism and crimes on them while you lay satisfyingly in the detainee office and say "thank you uncle sam, we did it!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131035</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1243508760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he couldn't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning.</i></p><p>You mean the drones who said, "no fingerprints, no entry" and turned him away?</p><p>Or the responsible employees who checked out his story and then let him thru?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he could n't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning.You mean the drones who said , " no fingerprints , no entry " and turned him away ? Or the responsible employees who checked out his story and then let him thru ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is news because there was a single idiot working at that location and he couldn't be bothered to actually do any critical reasoning.You mean the drones who said, "no fingerprints, no entry" and turned him away?Or the responsible employees who checked out his story and then let him thru?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130823</id>
	<title>My mom took something like this</title>
	<author>BigGar'</author>
	<datestamp>1243507860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Capecitbine after a few passes through the liver becomes 5-Fluorouracil or 5-FU, which is the drug she took.<br>It played hell on her hands &amp; feet and for several years she had no prints on her hands or feet.<br>It really sucks your hands &amp; feet are very raw/chapped all the time, just moving them could cause bleeding cracks to form; its just miserable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Capecitbine after a few passes through the liver becomes 5-Fluorouracil or 5-FU , which is the drug she took.It played hell on her hands &amp; feet and for several years she had no prints on her hands or feet.It really sucks your hands &amp; feet are very raw/chapped all the time , just moving them could cause bleeding cracks to form ; its just miserable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Capecitbine after a few passes through the liver becomes 5-Fluorouracil or 5-FU, which is the drug she took.It played hell on her hands &amp; feet and for several years she had no prints on her hands or feet.It really sucks your hands &amp; feet are very raw/chapped all the time, just moving them could cause bleeding cracks to form; its just miserable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136079</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243590420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What... you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?  Wow.  Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...</p></div><p>That doesn't make much sense. Most right wingers in your Americanadian political spectrum are all for "border protection": it is the left who want to eliminate borders.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What... you 'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security ?
Wow. Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government 's job is to protect the borders...That does n't make much sense .
Most right wingers in your Americanadian political spectrum are all for " border protection " : it is the left who want to eliminate borders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What... you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?
Wow.  Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...That doesn't make much sense.
Most right wingers in your Americanadian political spectrum are all for "border protection": it is the left who want to eliminate borders.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137053</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Alioth</author>
	<datestamp>1243602720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it's "Hi, we're from the Government, and we're not happy till you're not happy!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's " Hi , we 're from the Government , and we 're not happy till you 're not happy !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's "Hi, we're from the Government, and we're not happy till you're not happy!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797</id>
	<title>Re:That's Nothin'</title>
	<author>legirons</author>
	<datestamp>1243543260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it possible to get surgery or laser-work which just replaces your fingerprints with abusive messages directed towards anyone scanning them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible to get surgery or laser-work which just replaces your fingerprints with abusive messages directed towards anyone scanning them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible to get surgery or laser-work which just replaces your fingerprints with abusive messages directed towards anyone scanning them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134607</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243530780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?"</p><p>Emphatically yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" you 'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security ?
" Emphatically yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"you'd rather the US government got out of the business of border security?
"Emphatically yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131139</id>
	<title>So What....</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1243509240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the government does realize that alcohol does something of the same thing to your fingerprints. Your fingerprints become less pronounced and thus appear different when you are intoxicated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the government does realize that alcohol does something of the same thing to your fingerprints .
Your fingerprints become less pronounced and thus appear different when you are intoxicated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the government does realize that alcohol does something of the same thing to your fingerprints.
Your fingerprints become less pronounced and thus appear different when you are intoxicated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129071</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243544220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You, sir, are a fucking idiot.  Fortunately for you, Federal authorities will continue their work so fools like you can continue to keep bitching about how pointless their work is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You , sir , are a fucking idiot .
Fortunately for you , Federal authorities will continue their work so fools like you can continue to keep bitching about how pointless their work is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, sir, are a fucking idiot.
Fortunately for you, Federal authorities will continue their work so fools like you can continue to keep bitching about how pointless their work is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</id>
	<title>just doing their job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why think when you can follow protocol?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why think when you can follow protocol ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why think when you can follow protocol?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130813</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1243507800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wash my hands constantly (from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands, not for any job requirement) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day, and my fingerprints are still intact. Maybe she washes her hands even more than that, but I'm going to call bullshit on this one.</p></div><p>Lava Soap.  The power of pumice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wash my hands constantly ( from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands , not for any job requirement ) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day , and my fingerprints are still intact .
Maybe she washes her hands even more than that , but I 'm going to call bullshit on this one.Lava Soap .
The power of pumice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wash my hands constantly (from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands, not for any job requirement) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day, and my fingerprints are still intact.
Maybe she washes her hands even more than that, but I'm going to call bullshit on this one.Lava Soap.
The power of pumice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130515</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1243506360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the scariest words are "I'm just following orders."<br>Usually said right before you get pushed into a giant oven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the scariest words are " I 'm just following orders .
" Usually said right before you get pushed into a giant oven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the scariest words are "I'm just following orders.
"Usually said right before you get pushed into a giant oven.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131451</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job: So Was  Adolph Eichmann</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Was  Adolph Eichmann, and he got hanged. Perhaps we should start hanging the idiots who work for TSA and customs/immigration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Was Adolph Eichmann , and he got hanged .
Perhaps we should start hanging the idiots who work for TSA and customs/immigration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Was  Adolph Eichmann, and he got hanged.
Perhaps we should start hanging the idiots who work for TSA and customs/immigration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</id>
	<title>The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1243540860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're from the government, and we're here to help you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're from the government , and we 're here to help you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're from the government, and we're here to help you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28142303</id>
	<title>Re:The Penguin (not the Linux kind) tried this</title>
	<author>\_Ludwig</author>
	<datestamp>1243628160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's from the Batman movie.  The fingerprints thing was a ploy by the Penguin to get himself taken into the Batcave secretly carrying his dehydrated thugs, whom he accidentally reconstitutes with heavy water due to his umbrella handle snagging on the water fountain lever, moving it from "light" to "heavy."  As a result, the thugs turn back to dust at the slightest impact, foiling the Penguin's infiltration.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's from the Batman movie .
The fingerprints thing was a ploy by the Penguin to get himself taken into the Batcave secretly carrying his dehydrated thugs , whom he accidentally reconstitutes with heavy water due to his umbrella handle snagging on the water fountain lever , moving it from " light " to " heavy .
" As a result , the thugs turn back to dust at the slightest impact , foiling the Penguin 's infiltration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's from the Batman movie.
The fingerprints thing was a ploy by the Penguin to get himself taken into the Batcave secretly carrying his dehydrated thugs, whom he accidentally reconstitutes with heavy water due to his umbrella handle snagging on the water fountain lever, moving it from "light" to "heavy.
"  As a result, the thugs turn back to dust at the slightest impact, foiling the Penguin's infiltration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129971</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1243504380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt they held the plane for him; they might not even be willing to buy him a ticket on the next one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt they held the plane for him ; they might not even be willing to buy him a ticket on the next one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt they held the plane for him; they might not even be willing to buy him a ticket on the next one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28147951</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243674960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm the craziest right-wing loony, and I admit no such thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government 's job is to protect the borders...I 'm the craziest right-wing loony , and I admit no such thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even the craziest right-wing loonies admit that the government's job is to protect the borders...I'm the craziest right-wing loony, and I admit no such thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131417</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe, just maybe, she isn't using normal soap.  Keep in mind, biotech firm.  They tend to use rather nastier cleaning chemicals to be sure that all of the tools (including people's hands) don't carry things between samples.  Can't very well stick a lab tech's hands in an autoclave.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe , just maybe , she is n't using normal soap .
Keep in mind , biotech firm .
They tend to use rather nastier cleaning chemicals to be sure that all of the tools ( including people 's hands ) do n't carry things between samples .
Ca n't very well stick a lab tech 's hands in an autoclave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe, just maybe, she isn't using normal soap.
Keep in mind, biotech firm.
They tend to use rather nastier cleaning chemicals to be sure that all of the tools (including people's hands) don't carry things between samples.
Can't very well stick a lab tech's hands in an autoclave.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130141</id>
	<title>4 hours!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He must have been in the fast lane!
<p>

<i>Please try the buffet, yadda yadda yadda...</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He must have been in the fast lane !
Please try the buffet , yadda yadda yadda.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He must have been in the fast lane!
Please try the buffet, yadda yadda yadda...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1243543020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your sig is right on.<br>Why is four hours a huge deal? I've waited longer than that due to weather, airlines overbooking, and other reasons. As long as they treated him decently for the four hours this should not be a big issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your sig is right on.Why is four hours a huge deal ?
I 've waited longer than that due to weather , airlines overbooking , and other reasons .
As long as they treated him decently for the four hours this should not be a big issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your sig is right on.Why is four hours a huge deal?
I've waited longer than that due to weather, airlines overbooking, and other reasons.
As long as they treated him decently for the four hours this should not be a big issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131033</id>
	<title>Yeah, securiy theatre</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get the feeling that we are going to see more and more of this security theatre crap.  From what I understand there is no independent scientific evidence that fingerprints are a unique identifying feature, no mater how much the government wishes it was.  I recall several attempts by law enforcement to create "infailable methods" (the only one I can remember at the moment is "gait ID", something to do with how people walk) to identify people but eventually all of them were proven to be nothing more than an inpetus for convicting/harassing people on little to no evidence.  Even the DNA methods used by the FBI have been proven to be imperfect, being vastly less accurate than the FBI claimed.  Law enforcement/government/security needs to get over the falacy that there is some magical perfect ID method for finding "the bad people". (forgive my spelling errors, some moron removed OO from the PC)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get the feeling that we are going to see more and more of this security theatre crap .
From what I understand there is no independent scientific evidence that fingerprints are a unique identifying feature , no mater how much the government wishes it was .
I recall several attempts by law enforcement to create " infailable methods " ( the only one I can remember at the moment is " gait ID " , something to do with how people walk ) to identify people but eventually all of them were proven to be nothing more than an inpetus for convicting/harassing people on little to no evidence .
Even the DNA methods used by the FBI have been proven to be imperfect , being vastly less accurate than the FBI claimed .
Law enforcement/government/security needs to get over the falacy that there is some magical perfect ID method for finding " the bad people " .
( forgive my spelling errors , some moron removed OO from the PC )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get the feeling that we are going to see more and more of this security theatre crap.
From what I understand there is no independent scientific evidence that fingerprints are a unique identifying feature, no mater how much the government wishes it was.
I recall several attempts by law enforcement to create "infailable methods" (the only one I can remember at the moment is "gait ID", something to do with how people walk) to identify people but eventually all of them were proven to be nothing more than an inpetus for convicting/harassing people on little to no evidence.
Even the DNA methods used by the FBI have been proven to be imperfect, being vastly less accurate than the FBI claimed.
Law enforcement/government/security needs to get over the falacy that there is some magical perfect ID method for finding "the bad people".
(forgive my spelling errors, some moron removed OO from the PC)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131001</id>
	<title>Re:This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>and then release him after innocence proven."</i></p><p>Except this is the United States, and it is one's guilt that must be proven.  As long as the bumbling masses do not understand the difference, the decline of our society will continue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and then release him after innocence proven .
" Except this is the United States , and it is one 's guilt that must be proven .
As long as the bumbling masses do not understand the difference , the decline of our society will continue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and then release him after innocence proven.
"Except this is the United States, and it is one's guilt that must be proven.
As long as the bumbling masses do not understand the difference, the decline of our society will continue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971</id>
	<title>Best country in the world</title>
	<author>mofag</author>
	<datestamp>1243541100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always feel so welcome entering the US<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Seriously though, how often do border guards ever catch anyone? All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone? I feel certain that if they ever did, it would be all over the media. As evidenced here, this pointless pompous nonsense reaches the pinacle of its expression on the way into the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always feel so welcome entering the US : ) Seriously though , how often do border guards ever catch anyone ?
All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone ?
I feel certain that if they ever did , it would be all over the media .
As evidenced here , this pointless pompous nonsense reaches the pinacle of its expression on the way into the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always feel so welcome entering the US :)Seriously though, how often do border guards ever catch anyone?
All that frisking and undressing and do they EVER catch anyone?
I feel certain that if they ever did, it would be all over the media.
As evidenced here, this pointless pompous nonsense reaches the pinacle of its expression on the way into the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</id>
	<title>Can't be the first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243541040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>joebok</author>
	<datestamp>1243541820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, yes:</p><p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html" title="nwsource.com">http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html</a> [nwsource.com]</p><p>An alert border guard caught a guy trying to get across the border with a bunch of bomb stuff.  This case with the finger prints doesn't sound like a case of anybody being "alert" - but for my money, training people to detect and investigate is far better than the ridiculous security theater we usually see - taking off shoes and having jars of plum jam confiscated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , yes : http : //seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html [ nwsource.com ] An alert border guard caught a guy trying to get across the border with a bunch of bomb stuff .
This case with the finger prints does n't sound like a case of anybody being " alert " - but for my money , training people to detect and investigate is far better than the ridiculous security theater we usually see - taking off shoes and having jars of plum jam confiscated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, yes:http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2001/1125/cover.html [nwsource.com]An alert border guard caught a guy trying to get across the border with a bunch of bomb stuff.
This case with the finger prints doesn't sound like a case of anybody being "alert" - but for my money, training people to detect and investigate is far better than the ridiculous security theater we usually see - taking off shoes and having jars of plum jam confiscated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137343</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>MrNemesis</author>
	<datestamp>1243604520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When government officials can detain you whenever they want, they're the terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When government officials can detain you whenever they want , they 're the terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When government officials can detain you whenever they want, they're the terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130167</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1243505160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, there is a huge section of the population that have worn down fingerprints.</p><p>Nurses! You see anybody who has to constantly wash their hands in the medical field will have no prints after awhile, this is notorious amongst nurses/surgeons/mechanics/laborers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there is a huge section of the population that have worn down fingerprints.Nurses !
You see anybody who has to constantly wash their hands in the medical field will have no prints after awhile , this is notorious amongst nurses/surgeons/mechanics/laborers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there is a huge section of the population that have worn down fingerprints.Nurses!
You see anybody who has to constantly wash their hands in the medical field will have no prints after awhile, this is notorious amongst nurses/surgeons/mechanics/laborers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243501380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She secretly works for the MIB. They remove your fingerprints when they join. Every time you discover this, however, she gets you with her little memory-zapper-thingy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She secretly works for the MIB .
They remove your fingerprints when they join .
Every time you discover this , however , she gets you with her little memory-zapper-thingy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She secretly works for the MIB.
They remove your fingerprints when they join.
Every time you discover this, however, she gets you with her little memory-zapper-thingy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127985</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>harryandthehenderson</author>
	<datestamp>1243541100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grease up and slide through the air vents?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grease up and slide through the air vents ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grease up and slide through the air vents?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130635</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would think he might get a card to show the TSA when he flies. My Grandma has one for her hip replacement surgery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think he might get a card to show the TSA when he flies .
My Grandma has one for her hip replacement surgery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think he might get a card to show the TSA when he flies.
My Grandma has one for her hip replacement surgery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128383</id>
	<title>The Penguin (not the Linux kind) tried this</title>
	<author>RobertB-DC</author>
	<datestamp>1243542120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In an episode of the original Adam West "Batman" series, the caped crusader was performing a high-tech fingerprint scan on all the citizens leaving some sort of event.  Along comes a long-nosed fellow -- obviously The Penguin, since his disguise was about as effective as Superman's "Clark Kent" cover.  Batman attempts the fingerprint scan, but the man has no fingerprints.</p><p>"Holy Nonsequitur, Batman!" the intrepid Robin exclaims, "it's plastic!"</p><p>"Yes, I believe that's what the surgeon used," replies the ersatz innocent civilian.</p><p>Batman lets him go, but confides to Robin that he knows it's the Penguin -- but now that the dastardly enemy thinks he's slipped the trap, he will now lead them to the bad guys' secret lair.</p><p>Obviously, the TSA should have done the same with this guy.  Then, they could have found the entire Al Qaida leadership, probably meeting in a rakishly tilted room, behind the one-way mirror in a seedy magic shop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In an episode of the original Adam West " Batman " series , the caped crusader was performing a high-tech fingerprint scan on all the citizens leaving some sort of event .
Along comes a long-nosed fellow -- obviously The Penguin , since his disguise was about as effective as Superman 's " Clark Kent " cover .
Batman attempts the fingerprint scan , but the man has no fingerprints .
" Holy Nonsequitur , Batman !
" the intrepid Robin exclaims , " it 's plastic !
" " Yes , I believe that 's what the surgeon used , " replies the ersatz innocent civilian.Batman lets him go , but confides to Robin that he knows it 's the Penguin -- but now that the dastardly enemy thinks he 's slipped the trap , he will now lead them to the bad guys ' secret lair.Obviously , the TSA should have done the same with this guy .
Then , they could have found the entire Al Qaida leadership , probably meeting in a rakishly tilted room , behind the one-way mirror in a seedy magic shop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In an episode of the original Adam West "Batman" series, the caped crusader was performing a high-tech fingerprint scan on all the citizens leaving some sort of event.
Along comes a long-nosed fellow -- obviously The Penguin, since his disguise was about as effective as Superman's "Clark Kent" cover.
Batman attempts the fingerprint scan, but the man has no fingerprints.
"Holy Nonsequitur, Batman!
" the intrepid Robin exclaims, "it's plastic!
""Yes, I believe that's what the surgeon used," replies the ersatz innocent civilian.Batman lets him go, but confides to Robin that he knows it's the Penguin -- but now that the dastardly enemy thinks he's slipped the trap, he will now lead them to the bad guys' secret lair.Obviously, the TSA should have done the same with this guy.
Then, they could have found the entire Al Qaida leadership, probably meeting in a rakishly tilted room, behind the one-way mirror in a seedy magic shop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128351</id>
	<title>Re:That's Nothin'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Saw it last week. The movie is <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095107/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Ernest Saves Christmas</a> [imdb.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Saw it last week .
The movie is Ernest Saves Christmas [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saw it last week.
The movie is Ernest Saves Christmas [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130611</id>
	<title>Not just anti-cancer drugs</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1243506780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My skin routinely gets dry and flaky in the winter and during those times my fingerprints become unreadable. This confused the poor lady at the Driver's license office for a bit but she had me try different fingers until we found one that worked. I'm pretty sure this is not the correct process for that...
<p>
You would be amazed by how much grip those little ridges provide -- when my hands are like that I drop things a lot more and have to be careful when carrying glasses of water and stuff like that. I'd say the mutant power of someone with that condition is to NOT stick to things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My skin routinely gets dry and flaky in the winter and during those times my fingerprints become unreadable .
This confused the poor lady at the Driver 's license office for a bit but she had me try different fingers until we found one that worked .
I 'm pretty sure this is not the correct process for that.. . You would be amazed by how much grip those little ridges provide -- when my hands are like that I drop things a lot more and have to be careful when carrying glasses of water and stuff like that .
I 'd say the mutant power of someone with that condition is to NOT stick to things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My skin routinely gets dry and flaky in the winter and during those times my fingerprints become unreadable.
This confused the poor lady at the Driver's license office for a bit but she had me try different fingers until we found one that worked.
I'm pretty sure this is not the correct process for that...

You would be amazed by how much grip those little ridges provide -- when my hands are like that I drop things a lot more and have to be careful when carrying glasses of water and stuff like that.
I'd say the mutant power of someone with that condition is to NOT stick to things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655</id>
	<title>Been there, done that...</title>
	<author>Calibax</author>
	<datestamp>1243542840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was diagnosed with colon cancer in 2005, and after surgery I did the chemotherapy thing.  One of my drugs was Xeloda, which is the marketing name for capecitabine, the drug this guy is taking.</p><p>The problem mentioned in TFA is Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS) or palmer-palmer erythrodysesthesia.  Capecitabine causes redness, swelling, a rash, and burning pain in the hands and feet - and sometimes elsewhere such as joints and genitals.  In bad cases the skin peels and you get blisters, ulcers and sores in the affected areas.  This is because some of the drug leaks out of the capillaries and damages the surrounding tissues, and you have a lot of capillaries close to the surface in the hands and feet.</p><p>There are drugs (Vitamin B6, corticosteroids, dimethyl sulfoxide) that can help sometimes - but they didn't for me.  Walking became extremely painful, and my hands were constantly hot and painful, although I didn't lose my fingerprints as far as I know.  Everything returned to normal some months after chemotherapy completed.</p><p>I really sympathize with this guy.  Dealing with immigration headaches while having bad hand-foot syndrome would have been a total hassle for me.  Even standing up for a few minutes was torture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was diagnosed with colon cancer in 2005 , and after surgery I did the chemotherapy thing .
One of my drugs was Xeloda , which is the marketing name for capecitabine , the drug this guy is taking.The problem mentioned in TFA is Hand-Foot Syndrome ( HFS ) or palmer-palmer erythrodysesthesia .
Capecitabine causes redness , swelling , a rash , and burning pain in the hands and feet - and sometimes elsewhere such as joints and genitals .
In bad cases the skin peels and you get blisters , ulcers and sores in the affected areas .
This is because some of the drug leaks out of the capillaries and damages the surrounding tissues , and you have a lot of capillaries close to the surface in the hands and feet.There are drugs ( Vitamin B6 , corticosteroids , dimethyl sulfoxide ) that can help sometimes - but they did n't for me .
Walking became extremely painful , and my hands were constantly hot and painful , although I did n't lose my fingerprints as far as I know .
Everything returned to normal some months after chemotherapy completed.I really sympathize with this guy .
Dealing with immigration headaches while having bad hand-foot syndrome would have been a total hassle for me .
Even standing up for a few minutes was torture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was diagnosed with colon cancer in 2005, and after surgery I did the chemotherapy thing.
One of my drugs was Xeloda, which is the marketing name for capecitabine, the drug this guy is taking.The problem mentioned in TFA is Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS) or palmer-palmer erythrodysesthesia.
Capecitabine causes redness, swelling, a rash, and burning pain in the hands and feet - and sometimes elsewhere such as joints and genitals.
In bad cases the skin peels and you get blisters, ulcers and sores in the affected areas.
This is because some of the drug leaks out of the capillaries and damages the surrounding tissues, and you have a lot of capillaries close to the surface in the hands and feet.There are drugs (Vitamin B6, corticosteroids, dimethyl sulfoxide) that can help sometimes - but they didn't for me.
Walking became extremely painful, and my hands were constantly hot and painful, although I didn't lose my fingerprints as far as I know.
Everything returned to normal some months after chemotherapy completed.I really sympathize with this guy.
Dealing with immigration headaches while having bad hand-foot syndrome would have been a total hassle for me.
Even standing up for a few minutes was torture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015</id>
	<title>That's Nothin'</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1243541220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once I saw this movie, and some policemen caught Santa Claus, and he had <em>snowflake</em> fingerprints.  Seriously.  You should see it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once I saw this movie , and some policemen caught Santa Claus , and he had snowflake fingerprints .
Seriously. You should see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once I saw this movie, and some policemen caught Santa Claus, and he had snowflake fingerprints.
Seriously.  You should see it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131217</id>
	<title>Gasp!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1243509600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it could have been weaponized cancer! Ha! Didn't think of that one, did you!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it could have been weaponized cancer !
Ha ! Did n't think of that one , did you !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it could have been weaponized cancer!
Ha! Didn't think of that one, did you!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130091</id>
	<title>Re:That's Nothin'</title>
	<author>Morphine007</author>
	<datestamp>1243504860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sense a new market just <i>waiting to be tapped into!</i>...<br> <br> <br>... or maybe it's just gas</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sense a new market just waiting to be tapped into ! .. .
... or maybe it 's just gas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sense a new market just waiting to be tapped into!...
... or maybe it's just gas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131299</id>
	<title>The non-story</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1243510080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The incident happened in <b>December 2008.</b> </p><p><i>The loss of fingerprints is not described in the packaging of the drug...It is uncertain when the onset of fingerprint loss will take place in susceptible patients.</i> </p><p>It's a side effect of long term use. It isn't well documented. It doesn't always happen. It isn't well-understood.</p><p>---and if you are on this drug your long term survival prospects aren't particularly good. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capecitabine" title="wikipedia.org">Capecitabine</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>The letter in the <i>Annuals of Oncology</i> appeared online <b>today.</b> <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/05/27/fingerprints-may-vanish-with-cancer-drug.html" title="usnews.com">Fingerprints May Vanish With Cancer Drug</a> [usnews.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The incident happened in December 2008 .
The loss of fingerprints is not described in the packaging of the drug...It is uncertain when the onset of fingerprint loss will take place in susceptible patients .
It 's a side effect of long term use .
It is n't well documented .
It does n't always happen .
It is n't well-understood.---and if you are on this drug your long term survival prospects are n't particularly good .
Capecitabine [ wikipedia.org ] The letter in the Annuals of Oncology appeared online today .
Fingerprints May Vanish With Cancer Drug [ usnews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The incident happened in December 2008.
The loss of fingerprints is not described in the packaging of the drug...It is uncertain when the onset of fingerprint loss will take place in susceptible patients.
It's a side effect of long term use.
It isn't well documented.
It doesn't always happen.
It isn't well-understood.---and if you are on this drug your long term survival prospects aren't particularly good.
Capecitabine [wikipedia.org] The letter in the Annuals of Oncology appeared online today.
Fingerprints May Vanish With Cancer Drug [usnews.com] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132197</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1243514640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do they remove their fingerprints when YOU join? Are you really THAT important?</p><p>You're not making any sense, mate!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do they remove their fingerprints when YOU join ?
Are you really THAT important ? You 're not making any sense , mate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do they remove their fingerprints when YOU join?
Are you really THAT important?You're not making any sense, mate!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130677</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243507200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That might not be entirely fair.  I mean, it's their JOB to be suspicious, and to look for potential trouble.  They get a guy with no fingerprints, they have to wonder about it.  How would slashdot resolve the issue?  Just take the guy's word that he has no fingerprints, because he has cancer?  I don't think I would.  Accept his prescription as evidence?  Nahhh, terrorists have access to doctors and drugs after all.  I think that I would want to view his medical record, or call the hospital that has been treating him.  If he has no medical record, and if I can't call the hospital, I would DEFINITELY call a supervisor in to decide.</p><p>His appearance might help persuade me, but people go to great lengths, including plastic surgery, to disguise themselves.</p><p>The guy cleared customs in 4 hours?  I'll admit, it was a hassle.  One he could have probably avoided with a little forethought.  NOTE TO SELF: If I become a physical wreck, I should have it well documented before trying to cross any border checks anywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That might not be entirely fair .
I mean , it 's their JOB to be suspicious , and to look for potential trouble .
They get a guy with no fingerprints , they have to wonder about it .
How would slashdot resolve the issue ?
Just take the guy 's word that he has no fingerprints , because he has cancer ?
I do n't think I would .
Accept his prescription as evidence ?
Nahhh , terrorists have access to doctors and drugs after all .
I think that I would want to view his medical record , or call the hospital that has been treating him .
If he has no medical record , and if I ca n't call the hospital , I would DEFINITELY call a supervisor in to decide.His appearance might help persuade me , but people go to great lengths , including plastic surgery , to disguise themselves.The guy cleared customs in 4 hours ?
I 'll admit , it was a hassle .
One he could have probably avoided with a little forethought .
NOTE TO SELF : If I become a physical wreck , I should have it well documented before trying to cross any border checks anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That might not be entirely fair.
I mean, it's their JOB to be suspicious, and to look for potential trouble.
They get a guy with no fingerprints, they have to wonder about it.
How would slashdot resolve the issue?
Just take the guy's word that he has no fingerprints, because he has cancer?
I don't think I would.
Accept his prescription as evidence?
Nahhh, terrorists have access to doctors and drugs after all.
I think that I would want to view his medical record, or call the hospital that has been treating him.
If he has no medical record, and if I can't call the hospital, I would DEFINITELY call a supervisor in to decide.His appearance might help persuade me, but people go to great lengths, including plastic surgery, to disguise themselves.The guy cleared customs in 4 hours?
I'll admit, it was a hassle.
One he could have probably avoided with a little forethought.
NOTE TO SELF: If I become a physical wreck, I should have it well documented before trying to cross any border checks anywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</id>
	<title>some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>alphaFlight</author>
	<datestamp>1243541400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife had to get a special exemption to sit for the bar exam because the state police couldn't take her fingerprints, which were necessary for conducting the required criminal background check.  She has no idea why her fingerprints are virtually nonexistent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife had to get a special exemption to sit for the bar exam because the state police could n't take her fingerprints , which were necessary for conducting the required criminal background check .
She has no idea why her fingerprints are virtually nonexistent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife had to get a special exemption to sit for the bar exam because the state police couldn't take her fingerprints, which were necessary for conducting the required criminal background check.
She has no idea why her fingerprints are virtually nonexistent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128759</id>
	<title>Re:Headline on Fox News tonight:</title>
	<author>jmorris42</author>
	<datestamp>1243543140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror.</p><p>I know that stuff like the above passes for fall down funny amongst the Daily Show/Colbert/Kos set but really, you guys need to stop hitting the bong so hard it fries yer brains out.</p><p>Just how common do you thing people with no fingerprints are?  Don't you WANT something that odd to raise a red flag?  If this sort of thing isn't supposed to raise a flag, just what in your bizarro world would?</p><p>While TFA says the Dr. recommends patients carry a letter explaining this odd side effect it doesn't make clear whether the patient in question was carrying such documentation or even if it was this incident that lead to the recommendation.  As someone who has who has made a habit of reading news copy with a jaundiced eye, especially Reuters, one gets the impression this omission and the misleading way the article was written was deliberate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror.I know that stuff like the above passes for fall down funny amongst the Daily Show/Colbert/Kos set but really , you guys need to stop hitting the bong so hard it fries yer brains out.Just how common do you thing people with no fingerprints are ?
Do n't you WANT something that odd to raise a red flag ?
If this sort of thing is n't supposed to raise a flag , just what in your bizarro world would ? While TFA says the Dr. recommends patients carry a letter explaining this odd side effect it does n't make clear whether the patient in question was carrying such documentation or even if it was this incident that lead to the recommendation .
As someone who has who has made a habit of reading news copy with a jaundiced eye , especially Reuters , one gets the impression this omission and the misleading way the article was written was deliberate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Terrible New Terrorism Drug Helps Terrorists Evade Identification And Cause More Terrible Terror.I know that stuff like the above passes for fall down funny amongst the Daily Show/Colbert/Kos set but really, you guys need to stop hitting the bong so hard it fries yer brains out.Just how common do you thing people with no fingerprints are?
Don't you WANT something that odd to raise a red flag?
If this sort of thing isn't supposed to raise a flag, just what in your bizarro world would?While TFA says the Dr. recommends patients carry a letter explaining this odd side effect it doesn't make clear whether the patient in question was carrying such documentation or even if it was this incident that lead to the recommendation.
As someone who has who has made a habit of reading news copy with a jaundiced eye, especially Reuters, one gets the impression this omission and the misleading way the article was written was deliberate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28138239</id>
	<title>What are they doing with all of these fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243609140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they just cross referencing them and then dumping them?<br>Or are they building a database?<br>Seems like if they are building a database it would get pretty inefficient quickly considering the accuracy of fingerprints;<br>if they are adding them to an existing database seems like it would increase dilution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they just cross referencing them and then dumping them ? Or are they building a database ? Seems like if they are building a database it would get pretty inefficient quickly considering the accuracy of fingerprints ; if they are adding them to an existing database seems like it would increase dilution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they just cross referencing them and then dumping them?Or are they building a database?Seems like if they are building a database it would get pretty inefficient quickly considering the accuracy of fingerprints;if they are adding them to an existing database seems like it would increase dilution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128177</id>
	<title>Maybe they'll use the cancer drug on Flourosapien</title>
	<author>davidsyes</author>
	<datestamp>1243541640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>subjects?</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8070252.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8070252.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>subjects ? http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8070252.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>subjects?http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8070252.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28135231</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Mr. Slippery</author>
	<datestamp>1243536600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>These are low-wage worker bees.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>If security is important, you don't put it in the hands of low-wage worker bees. You put it in the charge of highly paid, highly skilled, creative and independent thinkers.

</p><p>If you want the illusion of security, though, drones will do fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These are low-wage worker bees .
If security is important , you do n't put it in the hands of low-wage worker bees .
You put it in the charge of highly paid , highly skilled , creative and independent thinkers .
If you want the illusion of security , though , drones will do fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> These are low-wage worker bees.
If security is important, you don't put it in the hands of low-wage worker bees.
You put it in the charge of highly paid, highly skilled, creative and independent thinkers.
If you want the illusion of security, though, drones will do fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129887</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit.</p><p>The scariest words in the English language are "I'm just doing my job." That doesn't sound so good in German either.</p><p>Besides, immigration officials aren't there to help anyone. Just ask the tourists who don't come to the US anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit.The scariest words in the English language are " I 'm just doing my job .
" That does n't sound so good in German either.Besides , immigration officials are n't there to help anyone .
Just ask the tourists who do n't come to the US anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.The scariest words in the English language are "I'm just doing my job.
" That doesn't sound so good in German either.Besides, immigration officials aren't there to help anyone.
Just ask the tourists who don't come to the US anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293</id>
	<title>Well</title>
	<author>jav1231</author>
	<datestamp>1243541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What choice do they have? It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug. It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What choice do they have ?
It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug .
It ended well so this is hardly a controversy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What choice do they have?
It could take 4hrs to verify someone is on such a drug.
It ended well so this is hardly a controversy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130607</id>
	<title>Re:Been there, done that...</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1243506780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad you are still around, and good of you to chime in. It's very important to know that this is not just one standalone case. Out of second hand experience, I know that this kind of trouble is the last thing you need when traveling. My parents did quite a lot of traveling when they were sick with cancer even though it was sometimes pretty hard. In their (and my) opinion, it's better to take a chance and make your life worthwhile.</p><p>That said, there's no need to make that (even) harder than it should be. Countries with these kind of restrictions or bad health care (or both) are easy to remove from the list of holiday destinations, unless - as with this case - there are additional reasons for visiting that country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad you are still around , and good of you to chime in .
It 's very important to know that this is not just one standalone case .
Out of second hand experience , I know that this kind of trouble is the last thing you need when traveling .
My parents did quite a lot of traveling when they were sick with cancer even though it was sometimes pretty hard .
In their ( and my ) opinion , it 's better to take a chance and make your life worthwhile.That said , there 's no need to make that ( even ) harder than it should be .
Countries with these kind of restrictions or bad health care ( or both ) are easy to remove from the list of holiday destinations , unless - as with this case - there are additional reasons for visiting that country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad you are still around, and good of you to chime in.
It's very important to know that this is not just one standalone case.
Out of second hand experience, I know that this kind of trouble is the last thing you need when traveling.
My parents did quite a lot of traveling when they were sick with cancer even though it was sometimes pretty hard.
In their (and my) opinion, it's better to take a chance and make your life worthwhile.That said, there's no need to make that (even) harder than it should be.
Countries with these kind of restrictions or bad health care (or both) are easy to remove from the list of holiday destinations, unless - as with this case - there are additional reasons for visiting that country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128247</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>evil\_aar0n</author>
	<datestamp>1243541820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the same thing, but there \_were\_ those "mental giants" that recently tried to blow up a temple in NYC, and shoot down a military plane with a rocket launcher.  Thing is, these geniuses didn't realize that they were being scammed by the Feds the entire time: the "C4" wasn't real, nor was the "rocket."</p><p>Ok, they had intent, and their motive was certainly questionable.  But their means were non-existent, and they weren't even smart enough to realize that.  At best, these punks should be called "unsocial retards," because they don't quite reach the bar for serious criminals.</p><p>Didn't matter: the papers were all full of chest pounding Feds congratulating themselves on catching these "terrorists."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the same thing , but there \ _were \ _ those " mental giants " that recently tried to blow up a temple in NYC , and shoot down a military plane with a rocket launcher .
Thing is , these geniuses did n't realize that they were being scammed by the Feds the entire time : the " C4 " was n't real , nor was the " rocket .
" Ok , they had intent , and their motive was certainly questionable .
But their means were non-existent , and they were n't even smart enough to realize that .
At best , these punks should be called " unsocial retards , " because they do n't quite reach the bar for serious criminals.Did n't matter : the papers were all full of chest pounding Feds congratulating themselves on catching these " terrorists .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the same thing, but there \_were\_ those "mental giants" that recently tried to blow up a temple in NYC, and shoot down a military plane with a rocket launcher.
Thing is, these geniuses didn't realize that they were being scammed by the Feds the entire time: the "C4" wasn't real, nor was the "rocket.
"Ok, they had intent, and their motive was certainly questionable.
But their means were non-existent, and they weren't even smart enough to realize that.
At best, these punks should be called "unsocial retards," because they don't quite reach the bar for serious criminals.Didn't matter: the papers were all full of chest pounding Feds congratulating themselves on catching these "terrorists.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129279</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1243501740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why get paid when you can think?</p><p>I'm guessing that you've never had the fun of working a menial job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why get paid when you can think ? I 'm guessing that you 've never had the fun of working a menial job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why get paid when you can think?I'm guessing that you've never had the fun of working a menial job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28150601</id>
	<title>Perfectly understandable</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1243708920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I'm saying is, if somebody had stolen *my* fingerprints, I'd want them to be held at an airport, cancer patient or no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I 'm saying is , if somebody had stolen * my * fingerprints , I 'd want them to be held at an airport , cancer patient or no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I'm saying is, if somebody had stolen *my* fingerprints, I'd want them to be held at an airport, cancer patient or no.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128381</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1243542120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport?</p></div><p>There's probably some procedure in place for people without fingers. However, the security droids' gears ground to a halt when confronted by a person with fingers but without fingerPRINTs. Didn't compute, so something shorted out and the error trapping routine kicked in. Sadly, the error trapping routine consists entirely of "ZOMG! PROBABLE TERRORIST!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport ? There 's probably some procedure in place for people without fingers .
However , the security droids ' gears ground to a halt when confronted by a person with fingers but without fingerPRINTs .
Did n't compute , so something shorted out and the error trapping routine kicked in .
Sadly , the error trapping routine consists entirely of " ZOMG !
PROBABLE TERRORIST !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does someone with their extremities amputated get through an airport?There's probably some procedure in place for people without fingers.
However, the security droids' gears ground to a halt when confronted by a person with fingers but without fingerPRINTs.
Didn't compute, so something shorted out and the error trapping routine kicked in.
Sadly, the error trapping routine consists entirely of "ZOMG!
PROBABLE TERRORIST!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130969</id>
	<title>Re:Off topic</title>
	<author>innocent\_white\_lamb</author>
	<datestamp>1243508520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to either tell noscript to allow fsdn.com, as others have said, or go to your user preferences and turn on the "classic index" (or words to that effect).  Either one works, but the "classic index" solution seems to work better -- I was missing the subject line bars over each message until I switched to the "classic index".  (You don't need to allow fsdn.com if you have the "classic index" switched on.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to either tell noscript to allow fsdn.com , as others have said , or go to your user preferences and turn on the " classic index " ( or words to that effect ) .
Either one works , but the " classic index " solution seems to work better -- I was missing the subject line bars over each message until I switched to the " classic index " .
( You do n't need to allow fsdn.com if you have the " classic index " switched on .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to either tell noscript to allow fsdn.com, as others have said, or go to your user preferences and turn on the "classic index" (or words to that effect).
Either one works, but the "classic index" solution seems to work better -- I was missing the subject line bars over each message until I switched to the "classic index".
(You don't need to allow fsdn.com if you have the "classic index" switched on.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128979</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>ivan256</author>
	<datestamp>1243543860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife worked at a biotech company. She had to wash her hands constantly for her job, and her fingerprints just washed off eventually.... But their security system to gain access to the building involved a fingerprint scanner and PIN.</p><p>She had to get a security exception to get into the building every single day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife worked at a biotech company .
She had to wash her hands constantly for her job , and her fingerprints just washed off eventually.... But their security system to gain access to the building involved a fingerprint scanner and PIN.She had to get a security exception to get into the building every single day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife worked at a biotech company.
She had to wash her hands constantly for her job, and her fingerprints just washed off eventually.... But their security system to gain access to the building involved a fingerprint scanner and PIN.She had to get a security exception to get into the building every single day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128627</id>
	<title>Cancer Patient might be an alien...</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1243542720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of an old episode of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlestar\_Galactica\_1980" title="wikipedia.org">Battlestar Galactica 1980</a> [wikipedia.org] where the young heroes got busted by the sheriff and accused of filing away their fingerprints to avoid identification.  The flying motorcycles were cool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of an old episode of Battlestar Galactica 1980 [ wikipedia.org ] where the young heroes got busted by the sheriff and accused of filing away their fingerprints to avoid identification .
The flying motorcycles were cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of an old episode of Battlestar Galactica 1980 [wikipedia.org] where the young heroes got busted by the sheriff and accused of filing away their fingerprints to avoid identification.
The flying motorcycles were cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130235</id>
	<title>Re:This is utterly non-news!</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243505340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The guy was screened routinely. "</p><p>THAT'S the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The guy was screened routinely .
" THAT 'S the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The guy was screened routinely.
"THAT'S the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131715</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243512180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this is (Score:4, Informative).  I love slashdot 3</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this is ( Score : 4 , Informative ) .
I love slashdot 3</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this is (Score:4, Informative).
I love slashdot 3</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137505</id>
	<title>Put these on in the mean time...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1243605600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sir, please put these fake gloves containing fake fingerprint, don't worry they are still unique, this way should you rob a bank or something, we will be able to trace you no matter where you go....oh and btw, if you do rob a bank, don't put gloves on top of these gloves please, it makes our jobs harder.</p><p>thank you , come again</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; O\_O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sir , please put these fake gloves containing fake fingerprint , do n't worry they are still unique , this way should you rob a bank or something , we will be able to trace you no matter where you go....oh and btw , if you do rob a bank , do n't put gloves on top of these gloves please , it makes our jobs harder.thank you , come again     O \ _O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sir, please put these fake gloves containing fake fingerprint, don't worry they are still unique, this way should you rob a bank or something, we will be able to trace you no matter where you go....oh and btw, if you do rob a bank, don't put gloves on top of these gloves please, it makes our jobs harder.thank you , come again
    O\_O</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130025</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>pcolaman</author>
	<datestamp>1243504560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hell, I wait longer than four hours to receive medical care at my typical ER.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , I wait longer than four hours to receive medical care at my typical ER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, I wait longer than four hours to receive medical care at my typical ER.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131831</id>
	<title>Re:The scariest words in the English language</title>
	<author>alxkit</author>
	<datestamp>1243512780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>whose government?</htmltext>
<tokenext>whose government ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whose government?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128279</id>
	<title>4 hours?</title>
	<author>anonieuweling</author>
	<datestamp>1243541880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As if the prints would return this quick?<br>
How stupid can you be if such a specific case takes 4 hours?<br>
DHS senior personnel thinks that they NEED fingerprints to let someone enter? [fascist state proof #1]<br>
DHS is unsure if they can send him back because there are no prints. <br> [cluelessness proof #1]
Etc.<br>
Of course the man didn't tell them he was taking medicine etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As if the prints would return this quick ?
How stupid can you be if such a specific case takes 4 hours ?
DHS senior personnel thinks that they NEED fingerprints to let someone enter ?
[ fascist state proof # 1 ] DHS is unsure if they can send him back because there are no prints .
[ cluelessness proof # 1 ] Etc .
Of course the man did n't tell them he was taking medicine etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As if the prints would return this quick?
How stupid can you be if such a specific case takes 4 hours?
DHS senior personnel thinks that they NEED fingerprints to let someone enter?
[fascist state proof #1]
DHS is unsure if they can send him back because there are no prints.
[cluelessness proof #1]
Etc.
Of course the man didn't tell them he was taking medicine etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130039</id>
	<title>Re:Can't be the first</title>
	<author>CraftyJack</author>
	<datestamp>1243504680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In that case, it's pretty obvious to a naive observer why no fingerprints are available.  I would imagine that if you have some less obvious medical condition that makes it difficult/painful to take fingerprints, then carrying some sort of a doctor's note would make your trip a whole lot easier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case , it 's pretty obvious to a naive observer why no fingerprints are available .
I would imagine that if you have some less obvious medical condition that makes it difficult/painful to take fingerprints , then carrying some sort of a doctor 's note would make your trip a whole lot easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case, it's pretty obvious to a naive observer why no fingerprints are available.
I would imagine that if you have some less obvious medical condition that makes it difficult/painful to take fingerprints, then carrying some sort of a doctor's note would make your trip a whole lot easier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161</id>
	<title>Re:some people just don't have fingerprints</title>
	<author>pcolaman</author>
	<datestamp>1243505100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wash my hands constantly (from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands, not for any job requirement) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day, and my fingerprints are still intact.  Maybe she washes her hands even more than that, but I'm going to call bullshit on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wash my hands constantly ( from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands , not for any job requirement ) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day , and my fingerprints are still intact .
Maybe she washes her hands even more than that , but I 'm going to call bullshit on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wash my hands constantly (from my irrational distaste for having unclean hands, not for any job requirement) on the measure of about 30-40 times a day every day, and my fingerprints are still intact.
Maybe she washes her hands even more than that, but I'm going to call bullshit on this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128765</id>
	<title>Do they fingerprint everyone?!</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1243543140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... entering the country.  What nonsense!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... entering the country .
What nonsense !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... entering the country.
What nonsense!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132185</id>
	<title>Confused...</title>
	<author>Chuq</author>
	<datestamp>1243514580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least at first, this showed up in my RSS reader as "Cancer Patient Held At Airport For Missing Finger..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least at first , this showed up in my RSS reader as " Cancer Patient Held At Airport For Missing Finger... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least at first, this showed up in my RSS reader as "Cancer Patient Held At Airport For Missing Finger..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128669</id>
	<title>Invasive procedure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did immigration started fingerprinting visitors in to the US?
This person was "visiting relatives" and wouldn't need a green card or work visa, why were they fingerprinting him?

Oh, yeah! because they can (invade our privacy).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did immigration started fingerprinting visitors in to the US ?
This person was " visiting relatives " and would n't need a green card or work visa , why were they fingerprinting him ?
Oh , yeah !
because they can ( invade our privacy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did immigration started fingerprinting visitors in to the US?
This person was "visiting relatives" and wouldn't need a green card or work visa, why were they fingerprinting him?
Oh, yeah!
because they can (invade our privacy).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929</id>
	<title>Off topic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for the off topic post does anyone else get this when clicking "Read more" on every article?</p><p>Connection Interrupted<br>The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.<br>The network link was interrupted while negotiating a connection. Please try again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the off topic post does anyone else get this when clicking " Read more " on every article ? Connection InterruptedThe connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.The network link was interrupted while negotiating a connection .
Please try again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the off topic post does anyone else get this when clicking "Read more" on every article?Connection InterruptedThe connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.The network link was interrupted while negotiating a connection.
Please try again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131549</id>
	<title>Re:Best country in the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243511280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>9 Years ago when this actually happened the US wasn't taking biometric data from everybody who wanted to visit US. Yeah they caught a terrorist at the border, but don't for a moment believe that any of these modern "security measures" had anything to do with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>9 Years ago when this actually happened the US was n't taking biometric data from everybody who wanted to visit US .
Yeah they caught a terrorist at the border , but do n't for a moment believe that any of these modern " security measures " had anything to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>9 Years ago when this actually happened the US wasn't taking biometric data from everybody who wanted to visit US.
Yeah they caught a terrorist at the border, but don't for a moment believe that any of these modern "security measures" had anything to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129263</id>
	<title>Re:That's Nothin'</title>
	<author>TheRealMindChild</author>
	<datestamp>1243501620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Laser? Just get a razor blade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Laser ?
Just get a razor blade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laser?
Just get a razor blade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130619</id>
	<title>Sense of touch</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1243506780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I wrote about this in <a href="http://soayacs.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com">my cancer blog</a> [blogspot.com] a few months back:</i> </p><p>I lost some feeling in my hands and feet due to the various chemotherapy drugs I've taken over the past five years. I also lost my fingerprints thanks to Xeloda, which irritates the palms and soles in a reaction called <a href="http://www.chemocare.com/managing/handfoot\_syndrome.asp" title="chemocare.com">hand-foot syndrome</a> [chemocare.com].</p><p>When I went to Disney World in 2007 I found that the entry gates use fingerprint scanners to ensure that the person using an electronic ticket is the same one who registered it. The scanner choked when I tried to register and an attendant had to override it. I bet that enough of the population has similar issues that it's in their training manual. I suppose it also means that people like me are a headache for anyone else trying to use fingerprints for identification.</p><p>Some of the numbness is nerve damage, particularly from the platinum-based drugs. The nerves do slowly heal, so I am getting some feeling back. In fact, now that I've been off of systemic chemo for four months I have enough feeling to realize that I lost more than I appreciated. Except for a period after a massive dose in 2005, the numbness hasn't been enough to interfere with tasks like holding a pen or buttoning a shirt. It's just been a dullness of sensation.</p><p>Today I learned that there's another explanation. According to <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/323/5914/572b" title="sciencemag.org">research published in Science</a> [sciencemag.org], fingerprints enhance the sense of touch. The ridges vibrate as they encounter bumps on a surface and transmit stronger signals to the nerve endings. So part of my numbness to texture is not just the nerve damage but the lack of fingerprints. I wonder if they, too, will regrow over time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wrote about this in my cancer blog [ blogspot.com ] a few months back : I lost some feeling in my hands and feet due to the various chemotherapy drugs I 've taken over the past five years .
I also lost my fingerprints thanks to Xeloda , which irritates the palms and soles in a reaction called hand-foot syndrome [ chemocare.com ] .When I went to Disney World in 2007 I found that the entry gates use fingerprint scanners to ensure that the person using an electronic ticket is the same one who registered it .
The scanner choked when I tried to register and an attendant had to override it .
I bet that enough of the population has similar issues that it 's in their training manual .
I suppose it also means that people like me are a headache for anyone else trying to use fingerprints for identification.Some of the numbness is nerve damage , particularly from the platinum-based drugs .
The nerves do slowly heal , so I am getting some feeling back .
In fact , now that I 've been off of systemic chemo for four months I have enough feeling to realize that I lost more than I appreciated .
Except for a period after a massive dose in 2005 , the numbness has n't been enough to interfere with tasks like holding a pen or buttoning a shirt .
It 's just been a dullness of sensation.Today I learned that there 's another explanation .
According to research published in Science [ sciencemag.org ] , fingerprints enhance the sense of touch .
The ridges vibrate as they encounter bumps on a surface and transmit stronger signals to the nerve endings .
So part of my numbness to texture is not just the nerve damage but the lack of fingerprints .
I wonder if they , too , will regrow over time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I wrote about this in my cancer blog [blogspot.com] a few months back: I lost some feeling in my hands and feet due to the various chemotherapy drugs I've taken over the past five years.
I also lost my fingerprints thanks to Xeloda, which irritates the palms and soles in a reaction called hand-foot syndrome [chemocare.com].When I went to Disney World in 2007 I found that the entry gates use fingerprint scanners to ensure that the person using an electronic ticket is the same one who registered it.
The scanner choked when I tried to register and an attendant had to override it.
I bet that enough of the population has similar issues that it's in their training manual.
I suppose it also means that people like me are a headache for anyone else trying to use fingerprints for identification.Some of the numbness is nerve damage, particularly from the platinum-based drugs.
The nerves do slowly heal, so I am getting some feeling back.
In fact, now that I've been off of systemic chemo for four months I have enough feeling to realize that I lost more than I appreciated.
Except for a period after a massive dose in 2005, the numbness hasn't been enough to interfere with tasks like holding a pen or buttoning a shirt.
It's just been a dullness of sensation.Today I learned that there's another explanation.
According to research published in Science [sciencemag.org], fingerprints enhance the sense of touch.
The ridges vibrate as they encounter bumps on a surface and transmit stronger signals to the nerve endings.
So part of my numbness to texture is not just the nerve damage but the lack of fingerprints.
I wonder if they, too, will regrow over time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131353</id>
	<title>America: A Dialogue</title>
	<author>QuoteMstr</author>
	<datestamp>1243510380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Based on a true story and submitted for your critical evaluation, dear reader, I present "America: A Dialogue".</p><p><b>Alice</b>: I can't believe people want to bring the 9/11 terrorists into the US.</p><p><b>Bob</b>: Well, it's the right thing to do. We need to stop torturing them and give them fair trials.</p><p><b>Alice</b>: But not here. They're too dangerous to bring into the country.</p><p><b>Bob:</b>: If our prisons can hold Timothy McVeigh, they can hold anyone. And they're being tortured over there.</p><p><b>Alice</b>: McVeigh is one thing, but if we hold Al Qaeda terrorists, their supporters will come down through Canada and bail them out of Fort Leavenworth. I think they're just too dangerous to keep here, and an island is much more secure anyway.</p><p><b>Bob</b>: But our soldiers are behaving like monsters and torturing these people.</p><p><b>Alice</b>: They deserve it anyway. They attacked us on 9/11. And the real monsters are on top*. Don't criticize our troops who are just trying to do their job. It must hard dealing with those people.</p><p><b>Bob</b>: We don't know they've done anything. They've never been tried. And our troops are responsible for what they do. Didn't we decide that at Nuremberg?</p><p><b>Alice</b>: We know they attacked us. These things happen during war. They happen all the time. My friend's father told me of some nasty stuff that happened in Korea. This is no big deal.</p><p><b>Bob</b>: <i>[dramatic facepalm, exit stage left]</i> </p><p><i>[Curtain drops, <b>Alice</b> appears from behind it]</i> </p><p><b>Alice</b>: I'm so glad we elected someone who can rehabilitate our image in the world.</p><p><i>[House lights]</i></p><p>* Note the slight improvement over the past few years</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on a true story and submitted for your critical evaluation , dear reader , I present " America : A Dialogue " .Alice : I ca n't believe people want to bring the 9/11 terrorists into the US.Bob : Well , it 's the right thing to do .
We need to stop torturing them and give them fair trials.Alice : But not here .
They 're too dangerous to bring into the country.Bob : : If our prisons can hold Timothy McVeigh , they can hold anyone .
And they 're being tortured over there.Alice : McVeigh is one thing , but if we hold Al Qaeda terrorists , their supporters will come down through Canada and bail them out of Fort Leavenworth .
I think they 're just too dangerous to keep here , and an island is much more secure anyway.Bob : But our soldiers are behaving like monsters and torturing these people.Alice : They deserve it anyway .
They attacked us on 9/11 .
And the real monsters are on top * .
Do n't criticize our troops who are just trying to do their job .
It must hard dealing with those people.Bob : We do n't know they 've done anything .
They 've never been tried .
And our troops are responsible for what they do .
Did n't we decide that at Nuremberg ? Alice : We know they attacked us .
These things happen during war .
They happen all the time .
My friend 's father told me of some nasty stuff that happened in Korea .
This is no big deal.Bob : [ dramatic facepalm , exit stage left ] [ Curtain drops , Alice appears from behind it ] Alice : I 'm so glad we elected someone who can rehabilitate our image in the world .
[ House lights ] * Note the slight improvement over the past few years</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on a true story and submitted for your critical evaluation, dear reader, I present "America: A Dialogue".Alice: I can't believe people want to bring the 9/11 terrorists into the US.Bob: Well, it's the right thing to do.
We need to stop torturing them and give them fair trials.Alice: But not here.
They're too dangerous to bring into the country.Bob:: If our prisons can hold Timothy McVeigh, they can hold anyone.
And they're being tortured over there.Alice: McVeigh is one thing, but if we hold Al Qaeda terrorists, their supporters will come down through Canada and bail them out of Fort Leavenworth.
I think they're just too dangerous to keep here, and an island is much more secure anyway.Bob: But our soldiers are behaving like monsters and torturing these people.Alice: They deserve it anyway.
They attacked us on 9/11.
And the real monsters are on top*.
Don't criticize our troops who are just trying to do their job.
It must hard dealing with those people.Bob: We don't know they've done anything.
They've never been tried.
And our troops are responsible for what they do.
Didn't we decide that at Nuremberg?Alice: We know they attacked us.
These things happen during war.
They happen all the time.
My friend's father told me of some nasty stuff that happened in Korea.
This is no big deal.Bob: [dramatic facepalm, exit stage left] [Curtain drops, Alice appears from behind it] Alice: I'm so glad we elected someone who can rehabilitate our image in the world.
[House lights]* Note the slight improvement over the past few years</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129007</id>
	<title>Re:just doing their job</title>
	<author>Frequency Domain</author>
	<datestamp>1243543920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why think when you can follow protocol?</p></div><p>These are low-wage worker bees.  The one thing they know for sure is that they won't get into trouble if they follow protocol.  Do you really expect them to think?  I'm not saying I like the result, but it's clear to me that if a TSA worker has a choice between your discomfort resulting from following protocol, and his if he breaks protocol and the outcome catches somebody's attention, he'll stick with protocol every time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why think when you can follow protocol ? These are low-wage worker bees .
The one thing they know for sure is that they wo n't get into trouble if they follow protocol .
Do you really expect them to think ?
I 'm not saying I like the result , but it 's clear to me that if a TSA worker has a choice between your discomfort resulting from following protocol , and his if he breaks protocol and the outcome catches somebody 's attention , he 'll stick with protocol every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why think when you can follow protocol?These are low-wage worker bees.
The one thing they know for sure is that they won't get into trouble if they follow protocol.
Do you really expect them to think?
I'm not saying I like the result, but it's clear to me that if a TSA worker has a choice between your discomfort resulting from following protocol, and his if he breaks protocol and the outcome catches somebody's attention, he'll stick with protocol every time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133759
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28135231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28144685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130039
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28147951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128351
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28142303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1617225_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130207
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28147951
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132087
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128249
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131549
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130561
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128247
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28142303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128129
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128765
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128979
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130161
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131417
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28132647
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129311
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129917
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128723
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129971
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130547
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130025
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130125
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134633
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130905
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130693
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28137343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129007
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28135231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131043
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128669
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128797
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130091
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128085
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131035
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28133243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130039
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28131201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28134643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130739
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28127929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28129053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28130969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1617225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28128145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28136211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1617225.28144685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
